No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300221014986982) r x^ P � ti,fit t'1 ly r f 18516 Cottonwood& Ida ; PUDP 615 E Cottonwood Street& 7.20 N Ida Ave Bangtail Partners, LLC 10/31/2018 b wr S' K � I Jr1 1 0t A i w it r -1. From: Alice Flynn To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood and Ida PUD Application 18516 Date: Monday,March 25,2019 11:25:45 AM Importance: High Alice Flynn 431 N 4th Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 March 25, 2019 City Commission, Brian Krueger PO Box 1230 Bozeman MT 59771-1230 agenda la-bozeman.net Re: Cottonwood and Ida PUD Application 18516 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing as a home owner on the North Side and the Business Manager of Radiant Design & Supply, Inc., 501 E Peach St. I have lived in Bozeman since 1970. As I've watched our city grow, I have had the same concerns as other residents regarding affordable housing, historic preservation, and preserving the qualities of Bozeman that make this city our choice for home. Because I have lived my entire life in Montana, I have seen 67 winters and the snow conditions that affect traffic and parking. I have concerns about any new development or street construction that does not plan for the harshest winter conditions. Even for good weather, I am concerned about what I see in the number of residents and employees projected in the plan for Cottonwood and Ida, PUD 18516. The standards Bozeman has for parking, setbacks, apartment buildings, and other requirements, exist for good reasons. If the development is allowed to be built with the variances the developers have outlined, there will be a negative impact on the neighborhood where I work. The large flatbeds and semi-trucks that require access in and out of our business at 501.E Peach Street will have even more difficulty with increased traffic and parking. The parking required for our employees and customers can be difficult to find and hazardous when snow narrows the streets. I hope you take into consideration my concerns about a development that, in my view, is not appropriate for this neighborhood. Sincerely, • • Alice Flynn Business &Marketing Manager Radiant Design & Supply Inc Formerly Radiant Engineering Inc 501 E Peach St Suite A Bozeman, MT 59715 From: Noah&Leona Poritz To: Agenda Subject: [SENDER UNVERIFIED]Cottonwood and Ida PUD Date: Monday,March 25,2019 11:37:27 AM Greetings Honorable City Commissioners. As a property owner in the NE Bozeman neighborhood, we object to all eleven of the applicants requests to relax Bozeman Municipal Code zoning regulations. We especially object to the applicant's requested alteration of maximum building height and front setbacks. We also especially object to applicants proposed reduction of required parking requirements. We feel that this proposed PUD is satisfactory without the applicant's requests to relax the Code. Sincerely, Noah and Leona Poritz 0 • From: Brodev Simkins To: Anenda Subject: Cottonwood and Ida Preliminary PUD Date: Monday,March 25,2019 2:48:07 AM To whom it may concern, At Simkins-Hallin we are keen to support public and private development that improves the community of Bozeman and the Gallatin Valley. We understand that thoughtful and responsible developers, like your partnership has proven to be, are paramount to realizing the community's potential. The East Cottonwood project you have planned is one that our company supports. It provides a unique opportunity to diversifying Bozeman's North Side. It adds needed livable units in a desirable neighborhood. The project also furthers the creative distinction in design that our community values, by utilizing architectural function and design appeal. Like others in the community we desire to see the inevitable changes in Bozeman be carried out responsibly. Proper foresight and steadfast planning are the only approach when calculating improvements. We hope that together with the City of Bozeman and related parties to the project that the East Cottonwood structures can become a reality under these principals. Please accept this message as an endorsement of our company to the planning and execution of the East Cottonwood housing and retail project. Best regards, Brodey Simkins Vice President Simkins-Hallin inc. 406,581,5494 Sent from my iPhone From: bioski2@)bresnan.net To: Agenda Subject: [SENDER UNVERIFIED]Cottonwood Ida PUD Date: Sunday,March 24,201910:07:59 AM Hi, In regard to Application#185161 would like to make a few comments. My main concern is the size, scope, density, and height of this project. It appears that the developers have asked for relaxations, increases, and exemptions for any items that would increase height, square footage, more density, and less parking etc. Why does the city try to have guidelines to keep growth reasonable,just to have the developers come in and ask for an easy ticket to increase their own profits at the expense of everyone who lives in the vicinity or visits there. I don't know if you have tried to drive on N. Wallace after the other recent developments lately, but it is becoming dangerous for all the bikers,joggers,walkers. and drivers.N. Wallace can not handle any increase in traffic, especially with the impact and scope of this proposal. And then there is the parking issue. I have seen and heard a trend lately of parking spaces being allotted to denser housing developments, only to be used for storage of boats, campers, skis, lawn mowers etc. and the residents proceed to park on the street. COB, please stand up for the majority and keep the developers in check and help preserve the integrity and livability of our neighborhoods. I believe the developers would still proceed with their plans without any of the relaxations. Thank you for listening and considering the majority, not the entitled. Steve Barber PS Love what you guys do and know you try to do right. From: Rob Pertzborn To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD(#18516) Date: Saturday,March 23,2019 9:17:12 AM Greetings All— I have reviewed the Cottonwood and Ida proposed PUD documents and site. I find the overall project to be extraordinary and believe that when it is completed, it will be an exceptional addition to the neighborhood and an asset to our community. Thanks for your careful review, and hopeful support, of the project. Sincerely, RJ P Robert J. Pertzborn,AIA Principal I Architect intrinsik architecture, inc. 111 north tracy avenue bozeman, montana 59715 t.406.582.8988 x209 From: Peter Bronken To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Project Date: Saturday,March 23,2019 6:20:36 PM Bozeman City Commissioners:Would like to voice my support for the Cottonwood&Ida project.As a 40+year property owner in the Northeast Neighborhood,I feel this is a long overdue concept that will provide for a variety of needs from residential to commercial applications.I think it will also help set the tone going forward in the rapidly developing NE sector of Bozeman.We are lucky to have people in our midst that have the vision and fortitude to . pursue such a worthwhile endeavor. Sincerely,Peter Bronken Sent from my iPad Dale Pickard Radiant Design&Supply Business 501 E. Peach Residence 527 North Montana r Bozeman MT 59715 March 17, 2019 Brian Kreuger and City Commission PO Box 1230 Bozeman MT 59771-1230 agenda@bozeman.net Re: Cottonwood and Ida PUD Application 18516 To those concerned, I own and operate a business located in the Trades Guild building at 501 East Peach. I am also an owner in the commercial building complex itself. This building complex is located on the corner of East Peach and North Church, in close proximity-within 2 blocks of the development under review, (PUD 18516). I own my home located at 527 North Montana and I have walked, biked and driven to work at my business and property on East Peach Street since 1988. I have admired much of the development in our neighborhood, especially the small homes that replaced the grain bins on Cottonwood. Even the larger building developments seem not to have violated standards in such a way as to adversely affect our neighborhood, especially with respect to traffic and parking. However, I find this proposed development, (PUD 18516) untenable in several respects and must recommend against allowing the several variances that will undoubtedly prove inimical to our neighborhood. The requested variances include restrictions against apartment buildings, parking, building setbacks, height restrictions, maximum restaurant area, alteration of street construction to accommodate the development, and other "Form and Intensity"standards regarding lot lines restrictions, lot coverage, storefront and landscape block frontage etc. With respect to the parking issue, it's apparent that the developers over-designed occupancy for the lot and then compensated for lost parking by reducing the parking • 0 standards. A third of the remaining unaccounted for parking requirement is to be provided off site in a nebulous future development of the brewery site. The proposal sacrifices building setbacks, sidewalks and the "adopted designs for local streets" along that block of Cottonwood in favor of "back out angled parking". This appears again to be a belated attempt to accommodate the excess number of vehicles the development expects to draw to the area. I prefer that apartment buildings not be permitted as an allowable use in the area as per existing standards. Adhering to the existing standard would reduce the parking and traffic conflicts associated with the site commensurately. I also prefer that existing standards requiring building setbacks, building heights, landscaping, and maximum restaurant size be adhered to. I have not studied the plans in detail but there needs to be some allowance for snow removal made that is associated with the overall required parking area. My concern is that allowing these variances will producee-a building development of a scale and density that will necessarily produce conflicts with the existing neighborhood- especially over parking, traffic congestion, and truck access to existing neighborhood businesses. It's clear that important design standards were ignored to maximize the occupancy of that block at the expense of others in the neighborhood. A development of this intensity and magnitude will necessarily negatively impact the ability to walk and bike in the neighborhood. By insisting on these several variances to the norm of existing standards without reason, the developers burden the neighborhood with an argument that we would prefer not to have. Other developments that do not intentionally violate standards would not require this kind'of expensive correction and input on the part of the local neighborhood. We would have preferred to have been approached with a design that met rattier than changed standards. Sincerely, Dale Pickard From: Samuel Thompson To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD#18516 Date: Wednesday,March 20,2019 10:43:06 AM March 20, 2019 RE: Cottonwood & Ida Preliminary PUD #18516 Dear City Commission, My name is Shaw Thompson and I reside in the grain elevator at 700 N. Wallace Ave. on the west side of the proposed project. This is the second letter I've written about the proposed project. My feelings have changed slightly. While I still feel that this project is generally well designed, I do not feel that the relaxation of the height restriction should be granted. The height of the proposed buildings will already be massive. And those height restrictions were put into place with good reason. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Shaw Thompson i • From: Sky Sterry To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD,Application#18516 Date: Monday,March 18,2019 1:32:41 PM 3/18/19 Re: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD,Application#18516 Dear City Commission, My name is Sky Sterry. I have lived in the Northeast neighborhood at 626 East Peach street for 22 years,I own two houses in the neighborhood. I also have a business a couple blocks away at 412 North Broadway ave. I have had the chance to review the plans for the above PUD,and wile I generally support and like the concept,I have the following concerns. I do not see anything addressing infrastructure concerns,specifically the effects of increased traffic in the neighborhood. The only way to get to the development would be N Ida,N Wallace,and E Tamarack. Traffic in the neighborhood is already a problem. In the winter,Wallace north of Peach is reduced to single lane, you have to pull over to let oncoming traffic through.Peach at the intersection of Wallace is also reduced to one lane in the winter. Tamarack is the best option to access the development,but it is inevitable that there would be a considerable increase in traffic on both Ida and Wallace. Has the city addressed traffic concerns with the development? Thanks for your time. Sky Sterry Wookey Design Studio,406-551-2000 412 North Broadway Ave,Bozeman MT 59715 www.wookey.net s • Ellen Herlant 517 East Cottonwood Street Bozeman MT, 59715 PAft*1 March 12, 2019 -��— City of Bozeman Department of Community Development Attn. Brian Krueger PUD Application 18516 Hello, I am a resident of the 500 East block Cottonwood Street in Bozeman, living in the same home for over 17 years. Our area has seen a lot of change and growth over the last two decades. Many houses have been renovated, some old structures torn down and a new building built in place. The neighborhood has mostly retained its character, mixed use with individual buildings with their own unique character. Many homes in this area are small compared to contemporary standards, building styles and materials are varied, and the overall character of the neighborhood is quaint and slightly funky or artistic. The PUD application#18516 is looking to place a large development on a small parcel on the edge of the current residential area in the Northeast neighborhood. The developers of the Cottonwood and Ida PUD are proposing a mixed use development. This does mirror the current character of the neighborhood. I presume that the proposed very many apartment units (over 100)are in line with the City of Bozeman's desire to increase population density within the city limits. I do not agree with the density of the proposed development and I do not think that this development should be granted the "RELAXATIONS" to the current standard that the City of Bozeman has decided is appropriate for this district. As a lay person not working in development, construction, or architectural fields it is overwhelming deciphering the building codes but I think I clearly understand The City of Bozeman Unified Development Code stated intent and purpose for the existing codes. (The following italic print is directly from the City of Bozeman website). Article 1; Sec.38.100.040-Intent and purpose of chapter.(38.01.040) A.The intent of this unfied development chapter is to protect the public health,safety and general welfare;to recognize and balance the various rights and responsibilities relating to land ownership, use,and development identified in the United States and State of Montana constitutions,and statutory and common law;to implement the city's adopted growth policy;and to tneet the requirements of state law. B.It is the purpose of these regulations to promote the public health,safety and general welfare by:preventing the creation of private or public nuisances caused by noncompliance with the standards and procedures of this chapter;regulating the subdivision,development and use of land;preventing the overcrowding of land;lessening congestion in the streets and highways;being in accord with the growth policy;providing adequate light,air,water supply,sewage disposal,parks and recreation areas,ingress and egress,and other public improvements;requiring development in harmony with the natural environment;promoting preservation of open space;promoting development approaches that minimize costs to local citizens and that promote the effective and efficient provision of public services, securing safety from fire,panic,and other dangers;protecting the rights of property owners;requiring uniform monumentation of land subdivisions and transferring interests in real property by reference to a plat or certificate of survey(MCA 76-3-102).It is further the purpose of these regulations to:,consider the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses,conserving the value of buildings,and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area(MCA 76-2-304). The proposed Cottonwood and Ida PUD 18516 is asking for "RELAXATIONS" or NEGATIONS of the current City of Bozeman Standards. I address some of these in the following paragraphs. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. Why should they be allowed to put an apartment building in an area that is zoned to NOT ALLOW apartment buildings. The above section from the Unified Development Code clearly states that the purpose of its regulations is to"prevent overcrowding of land". Building over 100 units of apartments on a 2 acre parcel is completely out of character for this neighborhood and probably for Bozeman in general, and it will be incredibly overcrowded both for the future residents and current residents of the area. 0 0 BMC 38.540.050.A.1 and BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Why should this PUD proposal be allowed to reduce BOTH the Residential Parking Standards and the Non-Residential Parking Standards in a neighborhood that already has major parking issues because of its com- mercial mixed use character. Adding 100 apartment units plus additional commercial space while requesting a reduction of the City of Bozeman's Standard Parking Requirements is going to increase the chaos of the already chaotic parking situation on the Wallace Avenue corridor. I am concerned about the proposed parking garage, I know that there is an underground stream bed below some houses on Broadway Avenue. This underground water has created challenges with some construction proj- ects in the neighborhood when the maps were not properly examined before a proposal was approved. I am wondering about the feasibility of building a parking garage in this proposed PUD, located just down the street from the existing stream bed. I feel it is important to call attention to this matter so that the developers and the City throughly examine existing mapping and do whatever necessary to be 100% confident that such a garage is possible to build in this location. If it hasn't been investigated and water is found to be located below this property after the plan has been ap- proved, how does this affect the amount of parking in the area or the proposed height of the buildings? BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards The request to increase the maximum lot coverage to 45% from the current City Code of 40% also should be questioned, Bozeman City Code explicitly says that the purpose of the current standard is to prevent overcrowd- ing of land and provide adequate light, parks and recreation, etc. Where are all these new residents of this apart- ment complex going to be able to enjoy a slice of Montana sunshine? And of course they want to increase the allowable height by 9 feet, Again the obvious question is WHY should the City of Bozeman grant these RELAXATIONS to the following standards. Is this a way to preserve the char- acter of the neighborhood? Is this development honoring the character of the neighborhood? Is this relaxation honoring the rights of other nearby property owners? BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards This PUD requests zero lot line conditions? How does this affect the neighborhood character, driving conditions (can you see around the edge of buildings built right on the corner?), the neighbors property values and aes- thetics of the community? If I lived next door, are my rights as a landowner being honored by allowing a RE- LAXATION of current code to allow a 9 foot increase of currently deemed appropriate building height to be built even closer to my property than the City of Bozeman currently recommends. This PUD also proposes to decrease the front setback from 20 feet to 8 feet. This is a reduction of more than 50 percent in open space around the front of the buildings. Again, the standards exist with the intention to "prevent overcrowding, provide adequate light.....and recreation areas...". Who does this benefit? How is this PUD working within the standards deemed appropriate by the City of Boze- man? Let me clearly repeat, these STANDARDS have been adopted by the City of Bozeman with the intended pur- pose; "to promote public health....general welfare; preventing overcrowding of land, ...lessening congestion in the streets...., requiring development in harmony with the natural environment; promoting preservation of open space...... The proposed PUD 18516 asks for many "RELAXATIONS" of the City Code. Requesting to build an apartment building is a request for a permission to do what is not currently a standard that the City of Bozeman approves of for this neighborhood. The City of Bozeman CANNOT in good conscience approve this currently proposed development. I respect the land owners right to build and develop and make a profit from their investment but I propose and request that the City of Bozeman guide them and require them to build in ACCORDANCE with the STANDARDS that the City of Bozeman, itself, has created in order to protect the integrity and beauty of our community. Thank you for reading and considering my comments. Sincerely, Ellen Herlant From: Paul House To: Aaenda Subject: Cottonwood Ida PUD Date: Sunday,March 17,2019 6:18:42 PM March 17, 2019 Re: Cottonwood & Ida Preliminary PUD, Application #18516 Dear City Commission, I write to you as a northeast neighborhood resident and homeowner since 1989. 1 would like to formally express my support for the Cottonwood & Ida PUD application. I feel that this project, as proposed, embodies a number of qualities that are exceptional: - Creative design with public open space and multiple structures; - Interesting architecture; - Underground parking to maintain as much ground surface car-free as possible; - Permeable landscaping to promote water infiltration and minimize runoff; - Energy efficient construction; - LEED certification, in fact the first LEED certified PUD to be proposed in Bozeman; - And an overall effort to listen to the neighborhood through the Rudat design process. Growth and development is inevitable and I feel the neighborhood is lucky to be offered something unique that is not merely reverse engineered for maximum financial gain. Sincerely, Paul House 510 N Church Bozeman, MT 0 • From: Jeffrey Welles To: Agenda Subject: 'Application 18516 Date: Friday,March 15,2019 10:00:42 AM Dear Members of the Department of Community Development, I am writing to express my opposition to the Cottonwood and Ida Preliminary Planned Development Application 18516.The application requests the city to relax 11 standards affecting such issues as permissible building heights, setbacks,lot line provisions,lot coverage,residential and commercial transparency,parking standards,etc.I live adjacent to the proposed development in a recently completed condominium.That project complied to the letter of the law with every city standard and requirement with no variances or"relaxation".I'm sure that the Department of Community Development has well established and thoughtful requirements for development that are consistent with the Bozeman Community Plan and Municipal Code.I don't understand why those standards and requirements should be"relaxed"for a developer to build a more imposing,visible,and denser project.If your mission is to balance the interests of economic development,the community,and developers,the preliminary plan seems to overly accommodate a developer at the expense of the community and your own standards and requirements.Thank you for considering my opposition and,if possible,I would request that you acknowledge receipt of my comments.I also will plan to attend the City Commission public hearing on March 25th to register my opinions. Best Regards, Jeffrey Welles 620 E.Cottonwood unit 201 Bozeman,MT 59715 1 Dear Honorable Mayor and Comp Sion members. March 18, 2019 Ida and Cottonwood application 18516 I own and work within the public notice perimeter for the above project. As such I generally support and welcome the improvements a project of this nature will bring to the neighborhood. Because of the very distinct and unique nature of this area I know each of you will give your careful consideration to several quantitative issues that are in the new Bozeman Community Plan. GOAL C-1: Human Scale and Compatibility- Create a communityposed of neighborhoods designed for the human scale and compatibility in which the streets and buildings are properly sized within their context services and amenities are convenient, visually pleasing, and properly integrated. "human scale and compatibility in which the streets and buildings are properly sized within their Context" The project lacks human scale, and the buildings are not sized within their context. The project is out of compliance with these standards and the majority of the relaxations are addressing these shortcomings. Specifically, BMC 38.310.040.c oversized restaurant, BMC 38.320.050 smaller set back, BMC 38.320.050 taller building, BMC 38.320.050 greater lot coverage, BMC 38.510.030.c and BMC 38.510.030.b reduced transparency, OBJECTIVE C-5.2: Encourage inclusion of plazas and other urban design features as public areas within developments. There is a court yard for the residents, but the design and placement do not invite the public. It is on the wrong, side of the building and will be a cold underutilized space. If it were open to Ida street and the southern exposure it would fulfill this requirement. Northeast Historic Mixed-Use District - Intent and Purpose. NEHMU The majority of relaxations are a result of this project not meeting the established zoning for the area. The sponsored study, RUDAT is also in conflict with the project as it forever removes "special Bridger mountain views" from this unique community. Specifically, the height of the northwest building, forty-five feet is high for this area and equipment and mechanical can already extend higher The project designates a parking field (sheet AS.100 1/21/2019) that is far larger than anything within the HMU zone. This oversized, generic parking field further diminishes the historic, human, and unique character of the neighborhood. This parking field appears to be significantly under designed compared to the rest of the application and yet may have the largest impact on the community. While I support the project intent of enhancing the community, I find the relaxations and parking field in direct opposition to that intent. I encourage you to consider the number of and nature of the relaxations against the carefully crafted Bozeman Community Plan, zoning and the community at large. This is a good project that is too big for the site or is simply in the wrong place. Thank you for your time, consideration and service. Engaged citizen. C 0 �1. N { Tracey Downing 509 East Cottonwood Street Bozeman MT,59715 March 14,2019 City of Bozeman Department of Community Development Attn.Brian Krueger PUD Application 18516 Hello,my name is Tracey Downing. I was born on 701 North Wallace Avenue over 60 years ago. I currently live a few houses down the street on Cottonwood Street where I have lived for 22 years. I think that the City of Bozeman should enforc-its own standards and codes. This PUD#18516 is asking for many rules and codes to be broken or changed. I think the developers are asking for too much. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. I don't like that they are requesting to build apartment buildings in this neighborhood. It isn't zoned for apartment build- ings. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 and BMC 38.540.050.A.2 One main concern is the traffic and parking in this neighborhood. There is no way that there will be enough parking for each place. No family or couple has just one car. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards If built as proposed,every bit of green space in that area will be gone. I value green space. It contributes to my health and to the health of the community. If it gets much taller than allowed standards ALL views in this area will be blocked. I am concerned this project will not fit in to the character of the neighborhood. It takes away from the charm of the area and it isn't fair to the neighbors. Thank you for your time. �' c Tracey Downing �`f _(9 3/13/19 Re: Cottonwood & Ida Preliminary PUD, Application #18516 Dear City Commission, It is my pleasure to submit a letter of support on behalf of the proposed Cottonwood and Ida PUD,Application 18516. I currently co-own the 600 North Wallace building and also own the 705 East Mendenhall building. I have an office in the 705 building and spend a lot of my time in this neighborhood. The north -east neighborhood is a vibrant and changing part of our town and I feel that the proposed development will be a great addition to the area. I am particularly excited to see that the project includes affordable housing and that it will also be a LEED designated building. Healthy buildings that limit the impact on the environment and are not only obtainable by those with financial resources need to be the standard and not the exception in our growing city. In addition,this project is a fine example of in fill development. Lastly,the developers listened to members of the community in the planning phase and incorporated their comments and sentiments into their design. In appreciation-chris Chris Bunting 13624 Kelly Canyon Rd. Bozeman, MT 59715 � s Robin Crough From: Deejay Newell <deejay@treelinecoffee.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 1:20 PM To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood & Ida Preliminary PUD, Application#18516 Categories: Public Comment Date: 3/12/2019 Re: Cottonwood & Ida Preliminary PUD, Application#18516 Dear City Commission, My name is Danielle (Deejay)Newell and am the co-owner Treeline Coffee Roasters located in the North East Side Neighborhood of Bozeman at 624 N. Wallace. My business partner and I have been following the Cottonwood& Ida project closely as it will directly affect our business with its close proximity to the cafe. I believe the project will be an excellent addition to the neighborhood as it will continue to instill a sense of community in the Northside. Right now, our neighborhood lacks affordable housing for the growing demographic of young professionals in Bozeman. I believe this project will open up opportunities for these individuals working in Bozeman and making Bozeman wages to live comfortably and sustainably in a neighborhood surrounded by a wide variety of businesses to cater to their daily needs. After reviewing the plans, I also believe that this project will enhance the aesthetic quality of the neighborhood. Right now, the space is not being utilized in an efficient way and by adding housing, parking and room for more business - we will continue to see the Northside grow in a sustainable and manageable way. This project has my support the for the reasons listed above as well as others not mentioned. I believe this project will benefit Bozeman and be an excellent addition to our community. Best, DEEJAY NEWELL BEAN AMBASSADOR P: 530-263-6752 E:DEEJAY an.TREELINECOFFEE.COM 1 0 0 From: Debra De Bode To: Agenda Subject: Comments on Cottonwood and Ida PUD,Application# 18516 Date: Sunday,March 10,2019 12:59:59 PM To: City of Bozeman Department of Community Development, Attn: Brian Krueger and City Commissioners I am writing as an owner of commercial property located two blocks from the proposed development, as well as a resident of the Northeast Neighborhood. I have attended several presentations/listening sessions about this property. I support the concept of in-fill -- to a point, but think that new developments should be planned to fit into existing neighborhoods, rather than impose an entirely different format on them. The immediate area currently consists almost exclusively of single-family homes and small shops and businesses -- no large apartment buildings or office buildings. I think that the developers are trying to do too much with a small parcel of land in a part of Bozeman that has a deficient set of roads to handle current traffic. Peach and Wallace streets have both recently undergone improvements and, other than the Rouse project, no other local road improvements are planned. I do not support the project as proposed. Specific to the variances that are being requested: 1) Apartments are needed in Bozeman, but the addition of 76 units along with an office building, workshops and a restaurant adds an unreasonable amount of activity to this location. If apartments are to become an allowable use in this district, the number of units need to be scaled back and/or some of the rest of the project needs to be denied. 2) The required front setback should be maintained for any allowed apartment building or residence. If a building is commercial in nature, having it more closely border the sidewalk may be acceptable. A question: What are the developer's plans for snow storage and removal? As the past two, snowy winters have demonstrated, this is a serious issue that affects parking, mobility and visibility for drivers and pedestrians. Any allowance of reduced setbacks should be tied to a plan to deal with snow on the property. 3) The allowable height should be maintained at 45 feet. Mountain views are an amenity for everyone that should not be compromised. 4) Landscape and Block Frontage requirements should be maintained as set forth in code. Bozeman prides itself on being a "tree city," "green," etc. -- not overly urban. 5)Neither Residential Parking Standards nor Non-residential Parking Standards should be reduced AT ALL. Maintaining these standards is key to preventing an unbearable amount of street congestion in the area. 6) The proposal to lease a significant amount of required parking on the land of the former Lehrkind Brewery is unacceptable in that it is obviously a temporary fix for a permanent problem. Future development of that parcel will occur and must be considered. Thank you, Debra De Bode MT Hop Dogs, LLC 527 N Montana Ave. Bozeman debradeboden.gma From: Samuel Thompson To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD#18516 Date: Friday,March 08,2019 2:08:59 PM March 8, 2019 RE: Cottonwood & Ida Preliminary PUD #18516 Dear City Commission, My name is Shaw Thompson and I reside in the historic grain elevator located at 700 N. Wallace Ave. - the neighboring property to the west of the proposed project. My family and I have restored this old building over the past 18 years and we are happy to live in it, and feel grateful to have a successful business, operating as the Misco Mill Gallery, in the building as well. I wish to voice my support for this project in this letter. I like the way the project has been presented to the neighborhood; asking for input from everyone. It seems that the project has listened to that input. Further, I feel the design is extremely thoughtful from the details of the buildings all the way to the landscaping. I like the mix of open public space with the higher density community. Also, the proposed construction methods are appealing for an environmentally conscious end result. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Shaw Thompson From: Gustav Dose To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD,Application#18516 Date: Thursday,March 07,2019 12:15:45 PM Attachments: PastedGraohic-2.tiff Dear City Commission, My name is Gustav Dose, I am the owner of Mountains Walking Brewery and live at 414 N Plum. I support the Cottonwood and Ida Project. After looking at the plans I think it will at a nice community feel and I really like the density and walkability factors. I think the area needs what this project provides in affordable housing. Thank you for considering my thoughts, With gratitude, Gustav Dose From:. Jessica Rounds To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD,Application#18516 Date: Tuesday,March 05,2019 10:42:39 AM Date: March 5, 2019 Re: Cottonwood& Ida Preliminary PUD,Application#18516 Dear City Commission, My name is Jessica Rounds and I have been renting 415 N Church Ave for the last 3 years. I have lived in a few different places around town for the last 6 years but northside area of Bozeman has captured my heart. I support this project because I love the idea of affordable housing that is eco-friendly and community focused. The design is beautiful and would only serve to continue elevating the northside aesthetic. My best, Jessica Rounds 415 N Church Ave Bozeman MT 59715 • 0 From: Peter MacFadven To: Agenda Subject: Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD,Application#18516 Date: Monday,March 04,2019 7:48:56 PM Attachments: Pete MacFadven Cottonwood&Ida Preliminary PUD.Application#18516.odf To whom it may concern, Please find attached my letter in support of the Cottonwood and Ida project. Pete Pete MacFadyen Founder & Executive Director Big Sky Youth Empowerment 406.539.0399 1 B. YEP ro g • • 3/4/2019 Re: Cottonwood & Ida Preliminary PUD, Application #18516 Dear City Commission, My name is Pete MacFadyen and I have lived at 314 North Wallace for over 15 years now. I'm so proud of the city for the excellent work that was completed on our street two summers ago now with the traffic circles and general calming measures. I hear lots of folks complain but at the end of the day as a resident the calming measures are working. Today I am writing to express my support for the Cottonwood & Ida project. Undoubtedly it will bring more traffic both cars and humans to our street but I must say being part of a community far outweighs the impact of increased traffic. I've looked at the plans and love that it offers 'affordable & attainable' housing to members of our community. The design is also very attractive (at least to my eye) and I believe it will serve to bring people together. With the addition of the Wild Crumb and Treeline Coffee my family and I have seen nothing but increased vitality in our neighborhood. There is something great about people on foot walking to pick up a loaf of bread or to grab a cup of coffee. In general this means that people look up and say hello which, of course, is one thing everyone loves about Bozeman. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have questions about my comments. But I wanted to let you all know that I think it's a great idea and I look forward to watching our community continue to transform in positive and well thought out ways. Sincerely, Pete MacFadyen From: Bob Bayley To: Acienda Subject: Development at E.Cottonwood and Ida Ave.App#18516 Date: Monday,March 04,2019 9:59:46 PM Dear City Commission, I am writing to strongly support the mixed use development proposed for my NE Bozeman neighborhood at the intersection of E Cottonwood and Ida Ave.My wife and I live at 104 N Church which is about one half mile south of the development.Although we have only lived in Bozeman for four years we were strongly attracted to the NE Bozeman neighborhood for its mixed use and dynamic,energetic urban character. Aspects of this development which deserve high praise and city approval include: -Mixed use and modest scaled buildings which mesh nicely with the surrounding community -Major affordable housing component -Generous open space which filters throughout the development and offers easy access to occupants and the community -Natural,creative landscaping which will serve as an example to the city,residents and developers on how to conserve water resources -Energy conserving -Ample parking,much of which will be below ground which will save valuable street level space for people, landscaping and buildings Sincerely, Bob Bayley 104 N Church,Unit I B 406-570-3643 ,i 'a ,dlr;' J� 1 ' ` `` r f _ 1 a .� *`s., � � �� t� - . /'' . `,#� � ' �z'��; O ,9 �. z ;x. I . �` � ti � � � 6 �; �, . . . . �,. :1 i r .' `�,, �� � f `�. i t.— 18516 City Commission Findings of Fact for the Cottonwood and Ida (PUD) Preliminary Plan Date: City Commission Public Hearing March 25, 2019 City Commission Room, Bozeman City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Project Description: A Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) application to allow a mixed residential and commercial development with relaxations to zoning regulations requested for apartment building use, building height parking, street design, restaurant design,transparency, front setbacks and a request for concurrent construction. Project Location: 615 East Cottonwood Street and 720 North Ida Avenue. The parcels are legally described as Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with conditions and code provisions Motion: "Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 18516 and move to approve the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions." Action Date: March 25, 2019 Staff Contact: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Executive Summary The property owner and applicant submitted an application to develop an existing underutilized site in the Northeast Historic Mixed Use District, NEHMU. The site is accessed from a future extension of East Aspen Street and from East Cottonwood Street. The development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings, an office building, a mixed use building including artisan manufacturing and a restaurant building. The proposal include four buildings. The largest building includes apartments, 64 units, and offices, 29,700 sq. ft., separated horizontally over an underground parking structure consisting of 96 parking spaces. The other buildings on site include a 12 unit apartment building, a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400 sq. ft. with 16 units mixed into the building and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building. The application includes the concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cottonwood Street. The subject property is zoned Northeast Historic Mixed Use District. The site is 2.06 acres in size. The north half of the property includes four multi use storage and warehouse buildings constructed beginning in 1960. All buildings on the north half of 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 2 of 38 the property are proposed for demolition. The south half of the site includes a grain warehouse building constructed in 1930. The grain warehouse is proposed to remain and be adaptively reused through the site development process for use as a restaurant/community building. Eleven relaxations to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) zoning regulations are proposed with the application: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. S. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10.BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11.BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. Concurrent construction of the adjacent streets, site infrastructure and buildings is proposed. The criteria for granting a PUD are found in BMC 38.430.090. A PUD is a discretionary approval and the review authority must find that the overall development is superior to that offered by the basic existing zoning standards as required in BMC 38.20.030.A.4.The intent of a PUD is to promote maximum flexibility and 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 3 of 38 innovation in development proposals within the City. The applicants can request relaxations from the code in exchange for a higher quality of design.The obligation to show a superior outcome is the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant asserts that the overall outcome of the proposal is superior to what would be obtained from the application of the default NEHMU district. The Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the application. Based on its evaluation of the application against the criteria, the DRC found the application adequate for continued review. The DRC supports the granting of concurrent construction for this project with the satisfaction of all code requirements related to concurrent construction with the final planned unit development application. The Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the application on February 27, 2019. The Design Review Board is the design review advisory body to the City Commission on this application. The DRB recommended approval of the project with the conditions and code provisions outlined in this staff report. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Committee reviewed the application on March 8, 2019 and recommended approval of the applicant's proposal to utilize cash in lieu of parkland for the parkland requirement for the development. The Community Affordable Housing Board reviewed the-application on March 13, 2019 and recommended approval of the applicant's proposal to utilize affordable housing in order to meet PUD performance points. The City Commission held a public hearing on the application on March 25, 2019. After the City Commission reviewed and considered the application materials, staff report, advisory review board recommendations, public comment, and all the information presented, they made individual findings and voted 5:0 to approve the motion to approve the application. The Commission agreed that the application met the criteria established by the Bozeman Municipal Code. Therefore, the application was approved with conditions and applicable code provisions outlined in these findings. The City Commission's review, deliberation and findings may be found under the linked minutes and recorded video of the meetings located at this web page filed under the date 3/25/19: https://www.bozeman.net/services/city-tv-and-streaming-audio The City received public comment on the application. Twenty public comments were submitted in writing prior to the public hearing and five public comments were received at the public hearing. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 4 of 38 Unresolved Issues There are no unresolved issues with the application. TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................. 1 UnresolvedIssues............................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 -MAP SERIES .:.................................................................................................. 5 SECTION 2 -RELAXATIONS ............................................................................................. 14 SECTION 3 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL..................................................................... 14 SECTION 4- REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS...................................................................... 17 SECTION 5 -ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ........................................................................20 SECTION 6 -FINDINGS OF FACT, ORDER AND APPEAL PROVISIONS ................... 34 APPENDIX A-PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY................................ 36 APPENDIX B-OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF........................... 36 .APPENDIX C-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT........................................... 37 ATTACHMENTS................................................................................................................... 38 v 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 5 of 38 SECTION 1 -MAP SERIES e E 61riRA(iK *[ A 7 i .' ®Mill]®�[_f I ..�..._ E 1SPEr ST -1 E A'SP! S'1' iris, h 1' t ra i t uu _ E CUT'I'U:V UD ST � t H I <I Legend 13 Planning Projects saleclbn !�� -:�.+:u.-:' �yF.� � IE PE, C11 ST _ i; LA Patois Roads �tt Limits k r e A PannninglPrrojects ' , �z• �. Zoning Classification 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 6 of 38 sc� n,�tnRnci<<�I� Dr,nSPE\(STD ' A:,Jr�PENnST a L rY .00010 Legend 0 Planning Projects selection Parcels Roads Alleys # �` City Llmito QPtanning Projects C Community Plan Future Land Use 't Residential Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Suburban Residential Regional Commercial and Services O Community Coto Community Commercial Mixed Use ! Business Pork Mixed Use Ei'PEACH'ST ❑Industrial -- Public.Institutions l ]Parks.Open Space and Ruueatlonaf Lands d Other Public Lands Gull Course Present Rural J C Aezui Growth policy designation • • 1 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 7 of 38 V. ETA _RACK ST • k •a'r�- e � E ASPEN SI ' A k E ASPEN ST `1�r Legend Planting Projects solection r City Limits(iNl18) r U Mixed Use f ReslauranllBar �P0NNOb6,+ST ® Conxnercial Retell Soles,Services,banks - —__ r' Ho --4W � Connmaiciaxnorcial Auto • Administrativ,a7rofesslonal Light Manufaluring + 3 Golf Course r Park or Open Space sJ C]Conservation Easement > ©Church Public Facility A I SchooftEducational Facility -+ [�Single-Household Residenbal [ ; DupleATriplex Residential (] Multi-Household Residential Mobile Home%Alobile Park CD Right-ol-Way, 1qT CD Undeveloped E PEACH ST s , [�vacant — C Parcels Roads ±a Alleys ti City Limits t w k O Planning Projects I j l _ �_ ——Ci I Sozemanj Current Land Use 131- Y--- T_ ' cg ilt s_ 7 • � 1 I � I $ o , 17-1 'bLz .I I I I I III rfuNKrvm � 1 , a NTI"�. I m1Y11iMaYaILL(� � , !.� I �t Oil 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 � 1' 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 9 of 38 Nome i I I FLE 1 T c � I 1 I 1 � 11 ; -r 1 J— ®;® LT- I UH iT 0 I i. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 10 of 38 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ARTISAN MFR. COMMUNITY y 5 � 2 S T I ,,,, 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 11 of 38 JI[Jr-r' ems. ' . A � _ - oL— (ID ® 4 B 11, p A , sear— CO 4yr.��, I \\z .m..� r �70 , all C''. ©� 00 1. .® t - 11I h �+ Eli _ n + F. _1 I I n �I1Wvf�Me_4oIlOAuOOD ,I sM e�v.,nx.soun rtonoxw000i Y••>rt•M•~ 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 12 of 38 <DO! rco. 2=3 M n119, 1WffM ni UP _ I i FfWACEAK � i 11 C R .�. r a=_ r—A irk a i i f 1 Py 11 1W3AR AK 14o•d<YONYt I.f,L uRN.am a Rom RAW K ili-J-�f %-�� IIC? ftli�ll,�� I 1L100 1] o I rr- I Tj I 1I- m :ILI T T- IDD co E.i --fa] FIT, If� I1'u III all =I11 Fri t' t&_Jj `iil— [9 o a iII n — 1 I I� Ig- I�- ;-el 7' jli I[➢ ldL e 1= Tu. I g -p- IILI ts b 71,1 (M, j:T�ll i I o -- _AV — s; Ed V - n 5-3 ' aF all T- in 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 14 of 38 SECTION 2 -RELAXA TIONS 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. S. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.B Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10.BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11.BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. The relaxations may be granted with a Planned Unit Development(PUD).The criteria for granting PUD relaxations are included in BMC 38.430.030.A.4:c. Staff has reviewed the criteria and finds that they are met for all eleven relaxations with the adoption of the staff analysis and findings below for justification. SECTION 3 - CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 15 of 38 2. The final planned unit development plan must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to the approval of any subsequent site plan. 3. The requested relaxations to the following sections are granted as proposed in the application materials and must be reflected in the final planned unit development plan, design guidelines and associated property owners' association documents as approved: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses.The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45'to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40%to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15%to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60%to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards.The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design.The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. 4. Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana must be aggregated and/or the common boundaries of said lots must be reconfigured through the applicable subdivision review process to accommodate the project prior to final planned unit development plan approval. S. Ten foot front setback utility easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans either through individual recordable documents or thorough the subdivision exemption review process prior to final 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 16 of 38 planned unit development plan approval. 6. Public access easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans for all publicly accessible open space areas prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 7. No property may be removed from the covenants without written approval of the City of Bozeman. 8. The City of Bozeman has relied upon the overall design and design standards required as part of the planned unit development application.The design and design standards may not be altered without consent of the City. 9. A notice prepared by the City must be filed concurrently with the amended plat so that it will appear on title reports. It must read substantially as follows The Amended Plat of Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana known as the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development (PUD) are subject to specific design standards, unique building setbacks and heights, parking requirements and uses. These standards may be found in .[insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development and are in place of the general development standards of the same subject of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Cottonwood and Ida PUD approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process.Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. 10. The applicant must execute at the Gallatin County Clerk&Recorder's Office prior to approval of the final Planned Unit Development, a waiver of right-to-protest creation of a City-wide special district for parks and trail,which would provide a mechanism for the fair and equitable assessment of costs for City parks and trails. 11.The offsite parking agreement must be for a minimum term of 25 years and must be completed, executed and filed prior to subsequent site plan approval. 12.The offsite parking agreement must be incorporated into the property owners' association documents as a required responsibility of the association along with the requirement to assess for and pay any required fees to satisfy the long term offsite parking agreement. 13. Prior to planned unit development final plan approval the applicant must provide the following modified historic property record documentation for the demolition of the existing structure at 620 E. Cottonwood Street: Property address, legal location, architectural description, digital interior and exterior elevation photographs, site map, and a quadrangle map.A modified completion of the Montana Historic Property 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 17 of 38 Record is a documentation of the current structure conditions and not an analysis of the historic integrity of property. The modified property card will be housed permanently online on the City's Architecture Inventory Map. 14.A deed restriction requiring affordable housing in the applicable amount proposed for planned unit development performance per the definition in BMC 38.700.020 must be placed on Lot A, underlying buildings 1, 2,and 6. 15.If not already filed for the subject site, the applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Street improvements to East Aspen Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk,and storm drainage b. Street improvements to Ida Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage c. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage d. Street improvements to East Tamarack Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk,and storm drainage e. Street improvements to East Peach Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk,and storm drainage f. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage g. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Tamarack Street h. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Peach Street i. Intersection improvements to Front Street and East Aspen Street j. Intersection improvements to Front Street and Ida Avenue The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to final PUD approval. 16.The intersections of East Aspen Street and Front Street and Ida Street and Front Street must be reconfigured to meet the City's minimum design standard. The intersections must be improved with the first phase of development. The City's Engineering Department may approve an alternative design incorporating the existing park provided the City Community Development Department and Parks Department support the alternative design.An alternative design must be approved prior to final PUD approval. SECTION 4-REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS 1. BMC 38.220.050.A final approved weed control plan must be submitted prior to planned unit development final plan approval. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 18 of 38 2. BMC 220.080. Irrigation water. Clarify proposed water demand for irrigation system. Clarify the nature of the existing well and water right to support the new demand. Provide letter from DNRC confirming water right or intent to issue right to support the project prior to approval of the planned unit development final plan. 3. BMC 38.220.300 and 310.The property owners' association documents must include the requirements of Section 38.220.300 and 320.The proposed documents must be finalized and recorded with the planned unit development final plan. 4. BMC 38.230.020.A and C.a subsequent site plan application is required to be reviewed and approved for all phases of this development prior to building permit issuance. S. BMC 38.270.030.D For concurrent construction provide a full response to the required items in Section 38.270.030.1) BMC.The concurrent construction response was provided,but not in accordance with the required section. Provide response to PUD concurrent construction and finalize all of the required code elements prior to the approval of the planned unit development final plan,approval of concurrent construction and prior to building permit issuance. 6. BMC 38.410.060.B.4 Encroachments proposed in required ten foot private utility easement areas required along all streets. No written approval from all utility companies is provided as required.The current and entire list of utility companies operating in Montana can be attained from the Montana Public Service Commission. Provide approval for encroachment prior to approval of planned unit development final plan. 7. BMC 38.420.030 Cash in lieu of land dedication for parkland. Cash in lieu of . parkland has not been paid.The cash in lieu amount due is required to be paid prior to subsequent site plan approval. 8. BMC 38.430.040.A.3 outlines the review and approval process for the planned unit development final plan. Final plan review and approval.The final plan must be in compliance with the approved preliminary plan and/or development guidelines. Upon approval or conditional approval of a preliminary plan and the completion of any conditions imposed in connection with that approval,an application for final plan approval may be submitted. For approval to be granted,the final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan.This means that all conditions imposed by the city commission as part of its approval of the preliminary plan have been met and: The final plan does not change the general use or character of the development; The final plan does not increase the amount of improved gross leasable non- residential floor space by more than five percent, does not increase the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent and does not exceed the amount of any density bonus approved with the preliminary plan; The final plan does not decrease the open space and/or affordable housing provided; The final plan does not contain changes that do not conform to the requirements of this chapter, excluding properly granted deviations,the applicable objectives and criteria of section 38.430.100, or other objectives or criteria of this chapter.The final plan must not contain any changes which would allow increased 0* . • 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 19 of 38 deviation/relaxation of the requirements of this chapter; and the final plat, if applicable, does not create any additional lots which were not reviewed as part of the preliminary plan submittal. Final plan approval.The final plan may be approved if it conforms to the approved preliminary plan in the manner described above. Prior to final plan approval, the review authority may request a recommendation from the DRB, DRC,ADR staff, or other entity regarding any part of a proposed final plan. 9. BMC 38.520.070 Location and design of service areas. No detailed service areas identified for gas and electric entrance locations into the buildings or proposed methods to separate and mitigate impacts as required.Show gas and electric locations with the true size and extent of all proposed meters as required per SP1 on entire site and the proposed locations for private utility entrance locations into the buildings. Planned unit development final plan must provide clear information on utility entrances into each building and demonstrate compliance with this code section with the subsequent site plan. 10.BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Provide site plan for offsite parking that demonstrates the proposed lot meets all requirements of the BMC and the off-site parking code section. Clarify the uses proposed to utilize the offsite parking and provide exhibit showing compliance with distance requirements per use. Provide draft long term parking agreement or draft deed restriction in order to demonstrate compliance with BMC 38.540.070.6 with planned unit development final plan. 11. BMC 38.55O.O5O.I. Irrigation plans are required to be submitted with the PUD open space landscape plan with the subsequent site plan application. 12.BMC 38.550.O6O.A.1.The PUD open space landscape plan must meet the requirements of 23 performance points and be finalized and completed with the subsequent site plan application. 13.BMC 38.4OO.O5O.A1.The property owner's association must maintain the proposed on street angled parking allowed on East Cottonwood Street including snow plowing and maintenance of the parking surfaces.The property owners' association documents must include language to this effect and be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval. 14.BMC 38.400.O10.A.8 The existing satellite dish encroaching into the emergency access route must be removed prior to final PUD approval to ensure emergency services are not inhibited. 15.BMC 38.400.O90.D.2 The applicant has indicated that the emergency vehicle access road will only be utilized by emergency service,as such the City's access standards do not apply provided the following are met: . a. The property owners association documents continue language describing the accesses may only be utilized be emergency services.The language must be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 20 of 38 b. City approved barricades are placed at both the north and south access points c. The street vision triangles for the north and south access points be removed from the final PUD submittal 16.BMC 38.400.100.0 Street vision triangles shown on the preliminary PUD submittal exceed the City's requirements. The final PUD submittal must correctly show the City's street vision triangles prior to approval. 17.BMC 38.410.060.A An amended plat must be completed prior to final PUD approval for the proposed changes to the lots. a. The public utility easements along the property street frontages must be provided using the City's standard language prior to final PUD approval. No encroachments may be permitted without the approval from the utility companies registered with the Montana Public Service Commission. b. The public access easements for required public sidewalks located outside of the right-of-way must be provided using the City's standard language prior to final PUD approval. c. A public drainage easement must be provided for the drainage infrastructure supporting the public right-of-way which is located inside of the property. The easement must be provided,reviewed,and approved by the City prior to final PUD approval. 18.BMC 38.410.070.A.1 Certified water and sewer design reports must be provided prior to final PUD approval. 19.BMC 38.410.080.A A certified drainage report for the public right-of-way drainage must be reviewed and approved by the City prior final PUD approval. a. The applicant must submit a stormwater maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater infrastructure for review and approval prior to final PUD approval.The approved maintenance plan be included within the property owner's associate document prior to final PUD approval. 20.BMC 38.430.070.A a.All public infrastructure,both on and offsite, must be installed with the first phase of development. SECTION 5 -ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 21 of 38 Applicable Plan Review Criteria,Section 38.230.100,BMC. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not in any way create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. In considering applications for plan approval under this title,the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy Yes.The property has a future land use designation of Industrial and is zoned NEHMU, Northeast Historic Mixed Use.The proposed residential units, office and restaurant uses and artisan manufacturing uses increase the intensity of commercial uses and the density of residential uses beyond the existing development pattern. The change in intensity is anticipated by the growth policy in areas of the city with adequate infrastructure. The project is in conformance to and consistent with the City's adopted growth policy,the Bozeman Community Plan,including the following goals and objectives: Goal LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City,efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work,and minimizes sprawl. The NEHMU district has a distinct sense of place,this project contributes to an existing and expanding mixed use area and allows people to live in close proximity to work, public and private basic services and minimizes sprawl. Objective LU-1.4 Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it.Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design. This project provides additional density of residential and commercial use while respecting the context of the mixed use area.The change in scale is allowable with the design presented as it has human scale and is compatible with the district with building sized within their context and integrated into the neighborhood. Objective LU-2.3: Encourage redevelopment and intensification,especially with mixed uses,of brownfields and underutilized property within the City consistent with the City's adopted standards. This project includes mixed uses and increase residential density and is proposed on underutilized property in an ongoing and developing mixed use district. Objective E-4.2: Promulgate efficient land use practices. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 22 of 38 This project promulgates efficient land use practices and provides a high net residential density and FAR with office, manufacturing and restaurant uses,while adding a significant amount of usable open space area that can be used by the entire community. Objective C-2.5 Explore and encourage innovative parking solutions for both residential and commercial projects including parking best practices,expanding parking districts,cash in lieu of parking and design guidelines for structured parking. This project proposes a parking reduction,structured parking integrated into the building design and offsite parking that will allow the project to provide an intensity of use today while having the ability to adapt to the changing transportation infrastructure in town including autonomous vehicles, ridesharing, car sharing,and increased transit service. Goal H-1: Promote an adequate supply of safe, quality housing that is diverse in type, density,cost,and location with an emphasis on maintaining neighborhood character and stability. This project provides additional quality housing at high density in an area that has historically included smaller residential low density uses. More recent infill projects in this neighborhood have included apartment uses over mixed commercial uses.This project will add to the neighborhood character and the stability of this area. Residential uses provide additional eyes on the street and have a twenty four hour presence that will make the district safer and enhance the overall neighborhood. For more information on the growth policy designation please see Appendix AA. 2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations Yes.The project, if approved,will conform to the Bozeman Municipal Code other than the requested relaxations.There are no known documented violations of the BMC for this property. Code provisions are provided related to final planned unit development plan approval and subsequent site plan approval. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws,ordinances,and regulations Yes.The proposed uses of the site are consistent with the allowed uses of the NEHMU district with the additional of the apartment building use. No specific conflicts have been identified.Additional steps will be required including but not limited to final payment for cash in lieu of water rights, approval of the final planned unit development, subdivision exemption to realign and aggregate the underlying lots, dedication of the utility easements,construction of infrastructure, PUD final plan documents and application, site plan approval and building permits.The Building Division of the Department of Community Development will review the requirements of the 0 • 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 23 of 38 International Building Code for compliance at the time of building permit application. Conditions of approval and code provisions are provided related to these issues. Condition of approval 1 requires full compliance with all applicable code requirements. 4. Conformance with special review criteria for applicable permit type as specified in article 2 Yes.The CUP and PUD criteria are reviewed below.The project meets the requirements and criteria as presented. 5.Conformance with the zoning provisions of article 3, including permitted uses, form and intensity standards and requirements,applicable supplemental use criteria,and wireless facilities and/or affordable housing provisions if applicable Yes.The uses are permitted in the NEHMU district with the addition of apartment building uses requested through relaxation. Form and intensity standards are met with the proposal other than the proposed relaxations for the front setback and zero lot line conditions,lot coverage and building heights.Affordable housing is proposed in compliance with the PUD performance standards and will be confirmed through the planned unit development final plan process. Condition of approval 14 requires a deed restriction to assure the applicability of the affordable housing long term is proposed. The north half of the property includes four multi use storage and warehouse buildings constructed beginning in 1960.All buildings on the north half of the property are proposed for demolition.The south half of the site includes a grain warehouse building constructed in 1930.The grain warehouse is proposed to remain and be adaptively reused through the site development process for use as a restaurant/community building.Condition of approval 13 is related to documentation of the grain warehouse prior to modifications to the building. 6. Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4,including transportation facilities and access,community design and element provisions, and park and recreational requirements Yes.The proposed streets meet standards with the proposed relaxations. East Aspen Street, East Cottonwood Street and North Ida Avenue are required to be improved with this project. The proposed parking is to be met with reductions allowed through relaxation of the parking requirements. Pedestrian access is provided from the street directly through and into the project. The primary entrances into each building are connected to the City's sidewalk system. Perimeter street frontage sidewalks are provided on every perimeter street in conformance to standards.The lots and block meet standards,water and sewer is provided to each lot through mains within the city owned rights of way. The applicant will be constructing water mains to support the site. Site surface drainage generally meets standards at this level in the design for the streets 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 24 of 38 and development. Cash in lieu of water rights is proposed and will be paid with the final site plan for site development. The applicant proposes to pay cash in lieu of parkland in conformance with standards, capped at twelve dwelling units per acre.The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Committee supports the use of cash in lieu for this project and recommends approval. Small encroachments are proposed into the required front setback utility easements. Condition of approval S requires the establishment of utility easements to serve the property and the surrounding utility grid. Code provision 6 requires approval of the utility holders prior to final approval of the encroachments. Concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, East Cottonwood Street and North Ida Avenue and the associated sewer and water mains is proposed. The Development Review Committee reviewed the request for concurrent construction with the understanding that the applicant agrees to standards and to complete the requirements in BMC 38.270.030.D with the planned unit development final plan and prior to building permit issuance.The Development Review Committee recommends concurrent construction be approved with all the required code elements. 7. Conformance with the project design provisions of article 5,including compatibility with,and sensitivity to,the immediate environment of the site and adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development; design and arrangement of the elements of the plan;landscaping; open space;lighting, signage; The development is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to, building mass and height,landscaping,orientation of parking and building placement on the site.The buildings comply with permanence in building materials,building quality,architectural integration,neighborhood identity,and orientation of parking and service areas.The general approach to landscaping meets standards. The design of the plan is consistent with the existing natural topography.The site will be raised to allow the inclusion of underground parking.There are no water bodies or significant existing vegetation on site. A general comprehensive signage is proposed in conformance with standards. Parking is proposed to be reduced via a relaxation for both residential and commercial uses. 96 parking spaces are proposed in an underground parking structure and 72 parking spaces are proposed offsite for the non-residential uses. 32 on street spaces are proposed for residential use. Prior to reductions the project would have required 2S5.3 parking spaces,with reductions the required parking is proposed at 166.1 parking • A 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 25 of 38 spaces. 200 parking spaces are proposed to be provided through a combination of onsite, offsite and on street as outlined above.The offsite parking must have a long term lease established prior to final approval of the site plan and.be integrated into the property owners association documents as a required element per conditions of approval 11 and 12. 8. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives set forth in articles 4-6,including the enhancement of the natural environment, watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats;and if the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area,have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area Yes. Pervious pavers are proposed to treat stormwater from the development.This is in compliance with best practices for Low Impact Development.The approach to the stormwater system meets code standards.The final review of the stormwater system will occur with the site plan review.The development is adjacent to a small public park and climbing boulder. No significant impact to-the park is anticipated from this development. 9.Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of article 4 and article 6 Yes.No streams,floodplains, critical plant communities or wetlands exist on site. 10.Other related matters,including relevant comment from affected parties Public comment has been received on this application.As of the writing of this report there were eight public comments received. Seven were in favor of the application and • 0 . 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 26 of 38 one was not in favor of the application citing.reduced setbacks,parking reductions and increased building height. 11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b.The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming The property must be configured through the applicable subdivision review process to relocate and aggregate common lot boundaries prior to the approval of the final PUD plan. Condition 4 is related to this issue. 12.Phasing of development The project is proposed to be constructed in one phase. Concurrent construction of East Aspen Street,East Cottonwood Street and North Ida Avenue and the associated sewer and water mains is proposed.The Development Review Committee reviewed the request for concurrent construction with the understanding that the applicant agrees to standards and to complete the requirements in BMC 38.270.030.D with the planned unit development final plan and prior to building permit issuance. The Development Review Committee recommends concurrent construction be approved with all the required code elements. Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria,Section 38.230.110,BMC. E. In addition to the review criteria of section 38.230.100,the review authority shall,in approving a conditional use permit, determine favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity; The site is adequate.The proposed buildings,site design,pedestrian connectivity,open space and mix of uses will enhance the neighborhood. Landscaped areas are coordinated with adjoining properties and within the proposed development. The landscape design will improve the street frontages of the site.The reduced setbacks proposed through relaxation relate well to the historic building placements within the vicinity.All parking is proposed either in an underground structure or offsite which 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 27 of 38 provides for an uninterrupted streetscape for pedestrians and the addition of on street parking. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof, No adverse impacts to abutting properties have been identified.The construction of East Aspen Street and the reconstruction and completion of North Ida Avenue and East Cottonwood Street will improve safety for vehicles,cyclists, and pedestrians which promotes public health and safety. General welfare will be promoted through a variety of apartment types which will provide a variety of housing options for area.residents. The provision of additional office, manufacturing and restaurant uses to the districts promotes general welfare by providing an expansion and additional density to the mixed of uses in the NEHMU.The development serviced by the existing municipal sanitary sewer and water systems promotes public health by protecting groundwater from degradation associated with on-site septic systems and domestic wells. Stormwater will be managed in pervious pavers and other retention facilities to filter out sediment and treat runoff. 3.That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare.Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use; b.Special yards,spaces and buffers; c.Special fences,solid fences and walls; d.Surfacing of parking areas; e. Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g.Regulation of signs; h.Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise,vibrations and odors; j.Regulation of hours for certain activities; k.Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; 1. Duration of use; m. Requiring the dedication of access rights;and 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 28 of 38 n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner. The requirements of the DRC review and the proposed conditions outlined in this report,the future covenants,the maintenance plans and project design guidelines associated with the project will address these areas. F.In addition to all other conditions,the following general requirements apply to every conditional use permit granted: 1.That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure; and 2.That all of the conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use,shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing,and shall be recorded as such with the county clerk and recorder's office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits,final plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. The necessary recording of documents will be addressed as part of the final PUD plan process. Conditions 3, 7, 8,and 9 are related to this issue. Planned Unit Development Review Criteria,Section 38.430.090.E,BMC. The application presents the applicant's response to these criteria. 2. In addition to the criteria for all site plan and conditional use reviews,the following criteria will be used in evaluating all planned unit development applications. a.All development.All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against,and comply with,the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory"all development"group. (1)Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply, trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigation companies,fire protection, electricity,flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone,storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Yes, except for those standards proposed for relaxation the application conforms and in some areas exceeds standards. (2)Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Yes.The site has been substantially disturbed by development and previous land uses and does not include significant natural vegetation.There will be substantial placement 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 29 of 38 of new vegetation within the site open spaces and perimeter street frontage.A code provision requires a final weed control plan with the planned unit development and further landscaping must be provided in accordance with code requirements with the subsequent site plan application. (3)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.)designed and arranged to produce an efficient,functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes.The proposal is cohesive and has a variety of coordinating elements ranging from efficient circulation, underground structured parking, integrated architecture between buildings, presentations of building fronts to the streets,private residential open spaces, open spaces available to the public,and multiple landscape configurations. Condition of approval 6 requires the recordation of public access easement in order to finalize all publicly accessible plaza and circulation areas as presented in the preliminary plans. (4)Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks;selection and placement of landscape materials;and/or use of renewable energy sources;etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Yes.The project proposes to construct to a LEED ND designation. LEED for Neighborhood Development(LEED-ND),where "LEED" stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a United States-based rating system that integrates the principles of smart growth,urbanism and green building into a national system for neighborhood design. LEED certification provides independent,third-party verification that a development's location and design meet accepted high levels of environmentally responsible,sustainable development.The LEED-ND system is a collaboration between the United States Green Building Council,the Congress for the New Urbanism and the Natural Resources Defense Council.A reduction in parking will require alternative modes of transportation be utilized by residents, employees,and customers of the developments. This will encourage enhanced transit to the area. (5)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.)designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Yes.The project is design to allow a diversity of residential types and configurations, many ground floor units have access to outdoor spaces for their own use which provide a public private separation for their units.Along the perimeter streets the residential units along the frontages are raised up above the sidewalk level to a varying degree to provide a transitional space between the public street and the private units.The 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 30 of 38 development complies with the interior special residential block frontage for all units. Landscaping is provided along the streetscape and within the development that will provide additional privacy.All vehicular access to the site is via the underground parking structure that will generally only be used by the residents, city services and their private service providers. (6)Park land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by section 38.420.020? Yes. Parkland is provided per code requirements via cash in lieu of dedication. Open space is provided for each residential building in compliance with standards. Conditions of approval 10 requires that a parks and trails district waiver be provided with the planned unit development final plan in accordance with BMC 38.420.100. (7)Performance.All PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points. Yes.With a PUD, Section 38.430.090.E.2.a.7 requires at least 20 performance points for the subject property.There are 11 options provided in the UDC to meet this requirement. Points can be met using any combination of on-site and off--site open space or other options listed in the code. The Preliminary PUD must specify how the performance points are being met. Open space provisions for phased PUD developments: If a project is to be built in phases, each phase shall include an appropriate share of the proposed recreational, open space, affordable housing and other site and building amenities of the entire development used to meet the requirements of section 38.430.090.E.2.The appropriate share of the amenities for each phase shall be determined for each specific project at the time of preliminary approval and shall not be based solely upon a proportional or equal share for the entire site. The PUD is proposing to satisfy the performance requirements with credits for affordable housing (21),additional open space with public access (9.37), underutilized and brownfield sites (6.67), LEED-ND (15) and low impact development plan (6).The tabulation is under the common open space section of the application narrative on page 25.The application satisfies the requirement with 58 performance points.The development exceeds standards. Conditions of approval, 6 and 14 are provided related to this issue in order to provide public access as proposed and to assure affordable housing is provided as required to achieve the performance points. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 31 of 38 (8)Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad"to adjoining development? Yes the project will create new connections to the neighborhood around it with the construction of additional streets sidewalks and open spaces. c. Mixed Use.Planned unit developments in mixed-use areas (REMU,UMU, and NEHMU zoning districts) may include commercial,light industrial,residential and mixes of various primary and accessory uses.The particular types or combination of uses are determined based upon its merits,benefits,potential impact upon adjacent land uses and the intensity of development. (1)Is the project substantially consistent with the intent and purpose statements for the underlying zoning district? Yes.This neighborhood includes commercial uses,offices, manufacturing and housing. The intent of the northeast historic mixed-use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements.The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses.This PUD provides a creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses. This PUD proposes appropriate use of the land with a broad range of nonresidential and residential uses. (Z)Is the project located adjacent or within proximity to an arterial or collector street that provides adequate access to the site? Yes.The project is located 300 feet from Peach Street,a collector street and 300 feet from Tamarack Street a collector street with both streets feeding into Rouse Avenue to the west the closest.arterial street to the project. (3) Is the project on at least two acres of land? Yes,the site is 2.01 acres of land. (4)Do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD,pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities, streetscape, etc.? Yes,the overall site layout and design guidelines provide a comprehensive design that coordinates pedestrian and vehicular circulation,architectural design and the utilization of open space and facilities. 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 32 of 38 (5)Does the overall project achieve or exceed the FAR 'floor area ratios"envisioned for the underlying district? Yes.There is no designated FAR required in the NEHMU.The proposed total FAR of the development is 1.8 with 46 dwelling units to the acre. (6)Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? Yes.This development will contribute to the mixed use character in this area and the eclectic residential and nonresidential uses located in this neighborhood. (7)Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas which contain more than ten spaces? Yes.All parking spaces are accesses through the underground parking structure.The offsite parking proposed at the northwest corner of Wallace Avenue and East Aspen Street is within the distance requirements for off-site parking.. CB)Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the city growth policy? Yes.This project is an infill project on an underutilized site. (9)Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas(such as urban plazas, courtyards, landscaped areas, open spaces, or urban trails)for the use and enjoyment of those living in, working in or visiting the development? Yes. Private residential and publicly accessible open space are proposed for those living, working in or visiting the development. (10)Does the project provide for private outdoor areas(e.g.,private setbacks, patios and/or balconies, etc.)for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light,sun, ventilation,privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Yes. Outdoor balconies and patios are proposed for many of the individual dwelling units. Shared green roof deck opens space is provided for the apartment residents in Buildings 1-2. Commercial open space is provided for the office use. (11)Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? Yes. Private and publicly accessible open space are proposed.The project is very close to the mountains to main street trail system. (12)Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and provide efficient public services and facilities? 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 33 of 38 Yes. Enhancements to this underutilized site and connection to city services will allow a high density residential development in close proximity to services,transit, recreation and employment opportunities.The project is being designed as a LEED-ND neighborhood. (13)If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing.types and urban styles designed to address community-wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? Yes,Affordable housing a variety of housing types and urban styles are proposed.A deed restriction is required in order to provide long term availability. (14)Residential density bonus. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus(30 percent maximum)above the residential density of the zoning district or building type within which the project is located and which is set forth in division 38.310 of this chapter, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards(such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.)and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development?The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus is determined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation must be provided within the project. Those dwellings subject to division 38.380 must be excluded from the base density upon which the density bonus is calculated. Not applicable. No formal density bonus is proposed. 18516 Findings of fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 34 of 38 SECTION 6 -FINDINGS OF FACT, ORDER AND APPEAL PROVISIONS A) PURSUANT to Chapter 38, Divisions 38.230, 38.430, BMC, and other applicable sections of Chapter 38, BMC, public notice was given, opportunity to submit comment was provided to affected parties,and a review of the preliminary plan for the planned unit development described in this findings of fact was conducted. The applicant presented to the City a proposed preliminary plan for a planned unit development to allow a mixed residential and commercial development with relaxations to zoning regulations.The development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings,an office building,a mixed use building including artisan manufacturing and a restaurant building. The proposal include four buildings.The largest building includes apartments, 64 units,and offices, 29,700 sq.ft., separated horizontally over an underground parking structure consisting of 96 parking spaces.The other buildings on site include a 12 unit apartment building, a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400 sq. ft.with 16 units mixed into the building and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building.The application includes the concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cottonwood Street. Eleven relaxations to City standards were proposed.The purposes of the preliminary plan review were to consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety,.welfare,and the other purposes of Chapter 38, BMC;to evaluate the proposal against the criteria and standards of Chapter 38 BMC; and to determine whether the plat should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. B) It appeared to the City Commission that all parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed preliminary plan and offer comment were given the opportunity to do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory bodies and considering all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment period defined by Chapter 38, BMC,the City Commission has found that the proposed preliminary plan of the P,UI)would comply with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code if certain conditions were imposed.Therefore,being fully advised of all matters having come before them regarding this application,the City Commission makes the following decision. C) The preliminary plan has been found to meet the criteria of Chapter 38, BMC,and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listed in Section 3 of this report and the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the Chapter including those identified in Section 4 of this report. The evidence contained in the submittal materials, advisory body review,public testimony, and this report,justify the conditions imposed on this development to ensure that the final site plan and 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 35 of 38 subsequent construction complies with all applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Chapter 38, BMC. D) This City Commission order may be appealed by bringing an action in the Eighteenth District Court of Gallatin County. The preliminary approval of this planned unit development shall be effective for one (1) year from the date of the signed Findings of Fact and Order approval. At the end of this period the City may,at the request of the developer,grant individual extensions to its approval by the Community Development Director for a period of not more than six months at a time consistent with the requirements of Section 38.230. DATED this 6t"day of May, 2019. r' BOZ'EMAN Y COMMISSION CYNTH .A DRUS Mayo ATTEST: J`n $C2 '7 • •• ROBIN CROUGH * _ City Clerk APPR VED AS TO FORM: GREG LLIVAN City Attorney 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 36 of 38 APPENDIX A -PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses; The property is zoned NEHMU, Northeast Historic Mixed Use The intent of the northeast historic mixed-use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses.Standards for buffering between different land uses are deliberately not as high as standards elsewhere in the community as it is assumed that persons choosing to locate in this area are aware of the variety of possible adjacent land uses and have accepted ' such possibilities as both acceptable and desirable. It is expected that the lots within this district will continue to develop under a variety of uses which may increase or decrease in scope in any given portion of the district.The clear intent of this district is to support a mix and variety of non-residential and residential uses. Nothing in division 38.300 of this article shall be interpreted to be discouraging or prejudicial to any listed use except as set forth as principal and conditional uses. Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property`is r designated as Industrial in the Bozeman Community Plan. This classification provides areas for the uses which support an urban environment such as manufacturing, warehousing;. and transportation hubs. Development within these areas is intensive and.is.connected to significant transportation corridors. In order to protect the economic base and.'necessary services represented by industrial uses, uses which would be detrimentally impacted by industrial activities are discouraged. Although use in these areas is intensive,these areas are part of the larger community and shall meet basic standards for landscaping and other site design issues and be integrated with the larger community. In some circumstances, uses other than those typically considered industrial have been historically present in areas which were given an industrial designation in this growth policy. Careful consideration must be given to public policies to allow these mixed uses to coexist in harmony. APPENDIX B - OWNER INFORMATIONAND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Bangtail Partners LLC 1189 Tennessee Street,Unit 103,San Francisco, CA 94107 Applicant: Imperial Development LLC 33 North Black Avenue, Bozeman,MT 59715 Representatives:Thinktank Design Group Inc.33 North Black Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715 Report By: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 37 of 38 APPENDIX C-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 38.430.010. Intent. A. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development (PUD) concept, to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and general welfare, it shall be the intent of this chapter to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: 1. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with the city's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies; 2. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the city area; 3. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities; 4. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks; S. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage, water quality and reduction of flood damage; 6. To encourage patterns of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation,thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; 7. To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation; 8. To reduce energy consumption and demand; 9. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography; 10.To improve the design, quality and character of new development; 11.To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas; 12.To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of incompatible developments; 13.To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer, the neighborhood and the community as a whole; 14.To.promote the efficient use of land resources,full use of urban services, mixed uses, I transportation options,and detailed and human-scale design; and 15.To meet the purposes established in section 38.01.040. i 18516 Findings of Fact Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 38 of 38 ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. r • BOZ E MAN MT Planning March 27, 2019 Thinktank Design Group, Inc. 33 North Black Ave. Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Cottonwood and Ida Preliminary Planned Unite Development Application 18516- Preliminary Approval Dear Sirs and Madams, On March 25,2019,the Bozeman City Commission met to consider your application for a preliminary planned unit development application to allow a mixed residential and commercial development with relaxations to zoning regulations requested for apartment building use, building height, parking, street design, restaurant design, transparency, front setbacks and a request for concurrent construction. After the City Commission reviewed and considered the application materials, staff report, advisory review board recommendations, public comment, and all the information presented, they made individual findings and voted to approve the motion to approve the application. The Commission agreed that the application met the criteria established by the Bozeman Municipal Code. Therefore, the application was approved with conditions and applicable code provisions. The City Commission's review,deliberation and findings may be found under the linked minutes and recorded video of the meetings located at this web page filed under the date 3/25/19: https://www.bozeman.neUservices/city-tv-and-streaming-audio The following conditions of approval and code provisions are required for this application: Conditions of approval: 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. The final planned unit development plan must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to the approval of any subsequent site plan. 3. The requested relaxations to the following sections are granted as proposed in the application materials and must be reflected in the final planned unit development plan, design guidelines and associated property owners' association documents as approved: Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. 1 \ BOZEMAN MT Planning 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45'to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15%to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.E Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60%to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. 4. Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06,T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana must be aggregated and/or the common boundaries of said lots must be reconfigured through the applicable subdivision review process to accommodate the project prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 5. Ten foot front setback utility easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary Bozeman, • 1 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. J BOZEMAN MT Planning planned unit development plans either through individual recordable documents or thorough the subdivision exemption review process prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 6. Public access easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans for all publicly accessible open space areas prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 7. No property may be removed from the covenants without written approval of the City of Bozeman. 8. The City of Bozeman has relied upon the overall design and design standards required as part of the planned unit development application. The design and design standards may not be altered without consent of the City. 9. A notice prepared by the City must be filed concurrently with the amended plat so that it will appear on title reports. It must read substantially as follows The Amended Plat of Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana known as the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development (PUD) are subject to specific design standards,unique building setbacks and heights,parking requirements and uses. These standards may be found in [insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development and are in place of the general.development standards of the same subject of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Cottonwood and Ida PUD approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process.Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. 10. The applicant must execute at the Gallatin County Clerk& Recorder's Office prior to approval of the final Planned Unit Development, a waiver of right-to-protest creation of a City-wide special district for parks and trail, which would provide a mechanism for the fair and equitable assessment of costs for City parks and trails. 11. The offsite parking agreement must be for a minimum term of 25 years and must be completed, executed and filed prior to subsequent site plan approval. 12. The offsite parking agreement must be incorporated into the property owners' association documents as a required responsibility of the association along with the requirement to assess Bozeman, 1 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZ MAN MT Planning for and pay any required fees to satisfy the long term offsite parking agreement. 13. Prior to planned unit development final plan approval the applicant must provide the following modified historic property record documentation for the demolition of the existing structure at 620 E. Cottonwood Street: Property address, legal location, architectural description, digital interior and exterior elevation photographs, site map, and a quadrangle map. A modified completion of the Montana Historic Property Record is a documentation of the current structure conditions and not an analysis of the historic integrity of property. The modified property card will be housed permanently online on the City's Architecture Inventory Map. 14. A deed restriction requiring affordable housing in the applicable amount proposed for planned unit development performance per the definition in BMC 38.700.020 must be placed on Lot A, underlying buildings 1, 2, and 6. 15. If not already filed for the subject site, the applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Street improvements to East Aspen Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage b. Street improvements to Ida Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage c. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage d. Street improvements to East Tamarack Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage e. Street improvements to East Peach Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage f. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage g. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Tamarack Street h. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Peach Street i. Intersection improvements to Front Street and East Aspen Street j. Intersection improvements to Front Street and Ida Avenue The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. B ®Z E MAN MT Planning waiver prior to final PUD approval. 16. The intersections of East Aspen Street and Front Street and Ida Street and Front Street must be reconfigured to meet the City's minimum design standard. The intersections must be improved with the first phase of development. The City's Engineering Department may approve an alternative design incorporating the existing park provided the City Community Development Department and Parks Department support the alternative design. An alternative design must be approved prior to final PUD approval. Code Provisions 1. BMC 38.220.050.A final approved weed control plan must be submitted prior to planned unit development final plan approval. 2. BMC 220.080. Irrigation water. Clarify proposed water demand for irrigation system. Clarify the nature of the existing well and water right to support the new demand. Provide letter from DNRC confirming water right or intent to issue right to support the project prior to approval of the planned unit development final plan. 3. BMC 38.220.300 and 310. The property owners' association documents must include the requirements of Section 38.220.300 and 320. The proposed documents must be finalized and recorded with the planned unit development final plan. 4. BMC 38.230.020.A and C. a subsequent site plan application is required to be reviewed and approved for all phases of this development prior to building permit issuance. 5. BMC 38.270.030.D For concurrent construction provide a full response to the required items in Section 38.270.030.D BMC.The concurrent construction response was provided, but not in accordance with the required section. Provide response to PUD concurrent construction and finalize all of.the required code elements prior to the approval of the planned unit development final plan, approval of concurrent construction and prior to building permit issuance. 6. BMC 38.410.060.B.4 Encroachments proposed in required ten foot private utility easement areas required along all streets. No written approval from all utility companies is provided as required. The current and entire list of utility companies operating in Montana can be attained from the Montana Public Service Commission. Provide approval for encroachment prior to approval of planned unit development final plan. 7. BMC 38.420.030 Cash in lieu of land dedication for parkland. Cash in lieu of parkland has not been paid. The cash in lieu amount due is required to be paid prior to subsequent site plan approval. Bozeman, • 1 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. 1 BOZ E MAN MT Planning 8. BMC 38.430.040.A.3 outlines the review and approval process for the planned unit development final plan. Final plan review and approval. The final plan must be in compliance with the approved preliminary plan and/or development guidelines. Upon approval or conditional approval of a preliminary plan and the completion of any conditions imposed in connection with that approval, an application for final plan approval may be submitted. For approval to be granted, the final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. This means that all conditions imposed by the city commission as part of its approval of the preliminary plan have been met and; The final plan does not change the general use or character of the development; The final plan does not increase the amount of improved gross leasable non-residential floor space by more than five percent, does not increase the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent and does not exceed the amount of any density bonus approved with the preliminary plan; The final plan does not decrease the open space and/or affordable housing provided;The final plan does not contain changes that do not conform to the requirements of this chapter,excluding properly granted deviations,the applicable objectives and criteria of section 38.430.100, or other objectives or criteria of this chapter. The final plan must not contain any changes which would allow increased deviation/relaxation of the requirements of this chapter; and the final plat, if applicable, does not create any additional lots which were not reviewed as part of the preliminary plan submittal. Final plan approval. The final plan may be approved if it conforms to the approved preliminary plan in the manner described above. Prior to final plan approval, the review authority may request a recommendation from the DRB, DRC, ADR staff, or other entity regarding any part of a proposed final plan. 9. BMC 38.520.070 Location and design of service areas. No detailed service areas identified for gas and electric entrance locations into the buildings or proposed methods to separate and mitigate impacts as required. Show gas and electric locations with the true size and extent of all proposed meters as required per SP1 on entire site and the proposed locations for private utility entrance locations into the buildings. Planned unit development final plan must provide clear information on utility entrances into each building and demonstrate compliance with this code section with the subsequent site plan. 10. BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Provide site plan for offsite parking that demonstrates the proposed lot meets all requirements of the BMC and the off-site parking code section. Clarify the uses proposed to utilize the offsite parking and provide exhibit showing compliance with distance requirements per use. Provide draft long term parking agreement or draft deed restriction in order to demonstrate compliance with BMC 38.540.070.6 with planned unit development final plan. Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. r B®Z E MAN MT Planning 11. BMC 38.550.050.1. Irrigation plans are required to be submitted with the PUD open space landscape plan with the subsequent site plan application. 12. BMC 38.550.060.A.1. The PUD open space landscape plan must meet the requirements of 23 performance points and be finalized and completed with the subsequent site plan application. 13. BMC 38.400.050.A1. The property owner's association must maintain the proposed on street angled parking allowed on East Cottonwood Street including snow plowing and maintenance of the parking surfaces. The property owners' association documents must include language to this effect and be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval. 14. BMC 38.400.010.A.8 The existing satellite dish encroaching into the emergency access route must be removed prior to final PUD approval to ensure emergency services are not inhibited. 15. BMC 38.400.090.D.2 The applicant has indicated that the emergency vehicle access road will only be utilized by emergency service, as such the City's access standards do not apply provided the following are met: a. The property owners association documents continue language describing the accesses may only be utilized be emergency services. The language must be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval. b. City approved barricades are placed at both the north and south access points c. The street vision triangles for the north and south access points be removed from the final PUD submittal 16. BMC 38.400.100.0 Street vision triangles shown on the preliminary PUD submittal exceed the City's requirements. The final PUD submittal must correctly show the City's street vision triangles prior to approval. 17. BMC 38.410.060.A An amended plat must be completed prior to final PUD approval for the proposed changes to the lots. a. The public utility easements along the property street frontages must be provided using the City's standard language prior to final PUD approval. No encroachments may be permitted without the approval from the utility companies registered with the Montana Public Service Commission. b. The public access easements for required public sidewalks located outside of the right-of-way must be provided using the City's standard language prior to final PUD approval. Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. ti 4 BOZEMAN MT Planning c. A public drainage easement must be provided for the drainage infrastructure supporting the public right-of-way which is located inside of the property. The easement must be provided, reviewed, and approved by the City prior to final PUD approval. 18. BMC 38.410.070.A.1 Certified water and sewer design reports must be provided prior to final PUD approval. 19. BMC 38.410.080.A A certified drainage report for the public right-of-way drainage must be reviewed and approved by the City prior final PUD approval. a. The applicant must submit a stormwater maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater infrastructure for review and approval prior to final PUD approval. The approved maintenance plan be included.within the property owner's associate document prior to final PUD approval. 20. BMC 38.430.070.A a.All public infrastructure, both on and offsite, must be installed with the first phase of development. This City Commission decision may be appealed according to the provisions of BMC 38.250,090. An aggrieved person may present to the court of record a petition, duly verified;setting forth that such decision is illegal in whole or part and specifying the grounds of illegality. Such petition shall be presented to the court within the timeframe established by state law. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 582-2259 or bkrueger .bozeman.net. Respectfully, 7 Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager C: Bangtail Partners, LLC PO Box 10195 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Imperial Development LLC 33 North Black Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 20 East Otive Street O P.O. :. TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. 18516 City Commission Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida (PUD) Preliminary Plan Date: City Commission Public Hearing March 25, 2019 City Commission Room, Bozeman City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Project Description: A Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) application to allow a mixed residential and commercial development with relaxations to zoning regulations requested for apartment building use, building height parking, street design, restaurant design, transparency, front setbacks and a request for concurrent construction. Project Location: 615 East Cottonwood Street and 720 North Ida Avenue. The parcels are legally described as Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with conditions and code provisions Motion: "Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 18516 and move to approve the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions." Report Date: March 13, 2019 Staff Contact: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Executive Summary The property owner and applicant submitted an application to develop an existing underutilized site in the Northeast Historic Mixed Use District, NEHMU. The site is accessed from a future extension of East Aspen Street and from East Cottonwood Street. The development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings, an office building, a mixed use building including artisan manufacturing and a restaurant building. The proposal include four buildings. The largest building includes apartments, 64 units, and offices, 29,700 sq. ft., separated horizontally over an underground parking structure consisting of 96 parking spaces. The other buildings on site include a 12 unit apartment building, a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400 sq. ft. with 16 units mixed into the building and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building. The application includes the concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cottonwood Street. The subject property is zoned Northeast Historic Mixed Use District. The site is 2.06 acres in size. The north half of the property includes four multi use storage and warehouse buildings constructed beginning in 1960. All buildings on the north half of 546 18516 Staff Report for thet ttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develpment PUD Page 2 of 35 the property are proposed for demolition. The south half of the site includes a grain warehouse building constructed in 1930. The grain warehouse is proposed to remain and be adaptively reused through the site development process for use as a restaurant/community building. Eleven relaxations to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) zoning regulations are proposed with the application: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10.BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11.BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. Concurrent construction of the adjacent streets, site infrastructure and buildings is proposed. The criteria for granting a PUD are found in BMC 38.430.090. A PUD is a discretionary approval and the review authority must find that the overall development is superior to that offered by the basic existing zoning standards as required in BMC 38.20.030.A.4. The intent of a PUD is to promote maximum flexibility and 547 18516 Staff Report for thettonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deve^ent PUD Page 3 of 35 innovation in development proposals within the City.The applicants can request relaxations from the code in exchange for a higher quality of design.The obligation to show a superior outcome is the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant asserts that the overall outcome of the proposal is superior to what would be obtained from the application of the default NEHMU district. The Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the application. Based on its evaluation of the application against the criteria, the DRC found the application adequate for continued review. The DRC supports the granting of concurrent construction for this project with the satisfaction of all code requirements related to concurrent construction with the final planned unit development application. The Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the application on February 27, 2019. The Design Review Board is the design review advisory body to the City Commission on this application. The DRB recommended approval of the project with the conditions and code provisions outlined in this staff report. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Committee reviewed the application on March 8, 2019 and recommended approval of the applicant's proposal to utilize cash in lieu of parkland for the parkland requirement for the development. The Community Affordable Housing Board reviewed the application on March 13, 2019 and recommended approval of the applicant's proposal to utilize affordable housing in order to meet PUD performance points. Public comment has been received on this application. As of the writing of this report there were eight public comments received. Seven were in favor of the application and one was not in favor of the application citing reduced setbacks, parking reductions and increased building height. Unresolved Issues There are no unresolved issues with the application. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions and report findings; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended conditions and modifications to the report findings; 3. Deny the application based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the review on the application with the concurrence of the applicant, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 548 18516 Staff Report for the9ottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deveipment PUD Page 4 of 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................::...................1 UnresolvedIssues.....................................................................................................................................3 Alternatives................................................................................................................................................3 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES............................................................................................................................5 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION / DEVIATIONS /VARIANCES................................ 14 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL..................................................... 14 SECTION 4- REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS................................................................................... 17 SECTION 5 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS............................................................................... 17 APPENDIX A-PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY.................................................33 APPENDIX B - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF..........................................34 APPENDIX C -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT...........................................................34 ATTACHMENTS...........................................................................................................................................35 549 18516 Staff Report for thettonwood and Ida Planned Unit Devepment PUD Page 5 of 35 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES lot r - 4 _..�.. ..�.,�_ E TAMARACK tiT i RNA � L►LJ Q: Alm Lei OrMOF a m t. -mop' 171 JON OW � �,♦ �_► it c �.�-� { ; Y, '�"'*—'err �► -� �,- _ .�1[J� '"'�i_ E CnT'I'UNWOOD ST y �-I M, wn U �� MCI Is At I Legend i Planning Projects selection +M�sir E PE ZE" ST Roads1� ANeys � City Limits C BZoning Districts Plarming Projects . Zoning Classification 550 18516 Staff Report for Attonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deve@Vment PUD Page 6 of 35 E TAMARACK ST s� [,ASPENS ST E ASPEN\ ST { � a E C(INTO-'1V006',S� w Legend Planning Projects selection Parcels Alleys a ' City Limits 0 Planning Projects Community Plan Putwe Land Use � Residential — t Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Suburban Residential Regional Commercial and Services C] Community Coro Community Commercial Mired Use Busirross Perk Mixed Use ;E,rPEACH ST' [] Industrial Public Institutions ;u C] Parks,Open Space and Recreational Lands Other Pubic Lands Goll Course u Present Rural f it A. Growth policy designation 551 18516 Staff Report for thettonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develpnent PUD Page 7 of 35 E TAAIA.RACK ST 1 •` i F, ASPEN ST II E;ASPEN ST � J Legend I 1...1 Planning Prolacts selection r City Llmils(111118) 0 Mixed Use Q Restauranit8az • � C0'1.TOlYWUUll ST 0 Commercial Retail Sales,Services,Banks _ — HoteltMotei Q Commercial Auto �1' r AdministrativelProfessianal 1 Light Manufacturing Q God Course� Pgik or Open Space Q Conservation Easement <w „ (] Church Public Facility SchoaEducational Facility Q Single-Household Residential Q Ou*-MTdplox ResWential � ;;w J t Q Multi-Household Residential �� ® Mobile HomelMobile Park k r Q Right-ol-Way k� fi • ••F Q undeveloped E PEACH ST w Vacant - _ Parcels Roads � i Alleys 'Q' l City Limits Planning Projects C J Current Land Use 552 -- ------ --�--------�—�— � __ _ I alw3nrY61u>rai II --, —1— T� 9 � • �� 1� r! �/i • I f I � IT I` I Is i L I :1, r 110 r v&-wi YYrm,., , f I > r • f 1 I l I Lem � � 1 o df 3� ! •� I.. �� I , ®lYUU11fA1 OJEO[� 1 't / I _____-__-_-_ ..-- 1 � 18516 Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 9 of 35 R 1 1 1 � I M r y H�E WJWW Tf L7 ' I. I I 1 h I bR 1 I [r r I _ . to a - • I - s NO - (V•If'It'.!II'1������9?..fir � ``� 554 18516 StafjF'Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 10 of 35 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ARTISAN MFR. COMMUNITY a � 1 ' S �ti t � 555 18516 Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 11 of 35 .y(AAW. tYtafl WWC�Ka wiYL .Rm AYl T1fAf JF77 all- YYwM)4 YY/. I Y.yY.YY/IxA r ,Y.ARKV KA Ytl Yf �YMYMVd !�' Tp�YWAV,IBx. )n .r-fAY.M aOta, rPC.tOt11YgIYlf[. NY•r.>YXYlNAY. p.Y6.A0Y40Y�M.'S PV7mM1Y fW I[IJO YY Nl.uWf ItAiri ILY1 �uwY.uw �y� i raufors I -�—«�om �� 1- .. f •1 a a faYY..f �i'[b0[RAYr•A.f.CY ��pff ifYATfgi- �C-I' �J�t.fOY.1.lPfR.M R!.O®vv11O uI.a MORK.O:�si�A m.11Ort Yf - N�i�wIfYAYYA Wyli YWwilf Aln. .HYYYtaYYM,K♦ YY1¢FYWaI. nPRO1W..dc. a. Ya)Rd1wrlY.xi •w .�.ApN1eA.1 WQaiY YpYYW V nrOR� ��FAY fOK yp �Ys ' iTn Am Q q an Q e a m a Ih m a B [III rn� t r w:o ..Yx..,..,.r,.Y�A. Yam... ..,.,. .. �IRO�RJ.O COROM/O00 ���aLYA/OlI.IOV�ICOTIOM000I Yv.xrt,.-.m 556 18516 Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 12 of 35 tT 1 z i IT, ,fY1AI�AtE t A4�.E65 _ h nYnttA.Ya .Y�w.c wttw.a .ay _ ' CA AM wAp Rcrt{pAW t FY��t:�.ew�tzurx OIOO, I BDOI SIM= RDO, F ,awl mco srao f vrnnYvr wa wr, _ I� 7 r f as f� ewe[ ,aoo meo Fm ova tAW./ gAAYE n hVa � Q � tAs� YrW 1no 1 RAUAQAM t fNM6N..0 n�na,�or.rt mwo•oerm a� r..w�ra.�.e• f .am aent�vww =rY�t. _�Mi 557 18516 Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 13 of 35 .,m, YL61 �� ..ate ...v ��. AOIf)•H. O �� •O �� O - r �/� 1 -1 ~-i'- r+i, .J+/ Ir •• T I COrtpMf0003T. �t�llasg�lw'las�oarvlxaooct VIA LEl _ _ MDOt tt 1171 1l' 141 t TO,?. . q I� !r:11�.�AmLL.-,•�.i "�'.1- _�P_ I�.....,.F ;.�}- � IT��- �=1 tJ 1 �1�— s_1 t�p��i�. '�i ��.11—• �f F= Ilr� —„i,F1;.F4�==1 —j� Il^�{— f—��.,��I .� � •1--+1 F"—�_—i F'T,Ld.: +--�; rJ_�],Eit f LL06, 8=4 1 1I-F �ipll I 1 F , ((pp ::!R•"" �•� a=1 � -�I .. � � I _ 16:i t 1 �� 1 iF1+F� IiJ�f— �.lf��f—I`FI'` I 1��sEawlr.r,s�anca noc 558 17232 Staff Report for the'gridger Vale Planned Unit Developmen'PUD) Page 14 of 35 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATIONS 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10.BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11.BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. The relaxations may be granted with a Planned Unit Development (PUD).The criteria for granting PUD relaxations are included in BMC 38.430.030.A.4.c. Staff has reviewed the criteria and finds that they are met for all eleven relaxations with the adoption of the staff analysis and findings below for justification. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 559 18516 Staff Report for theOttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Devetnent Page 15 of 35 2. The final planned unit development plan must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to the approval of any subsequent site plan. 3. The requested relaxations to the following sections are granted as proposed in the application materials and must be reflected in the final planned unit development plan, design guidelines and associated property owners' association documents as approved: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45'to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40%to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15%to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design.The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. 4. Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana must be aggregated and/or the common boundaries of said lots must be reconfigured through the applicable subdivision review process to accommodate the project prior to final planned unit development plan approval. S. Ten foot front setback utility easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans either through individual recordable documents or thorough the subdivision exemption review process prior to final 560 18516 Staff Report for the'L"ottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develtment Page 16 of 35 planned unit development plan approval. 6. Public access easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans for all publicly accessible open space areas prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 7. No property may be removed from the covenants without written approval of the City of Bozeman. 8. The City of Bozeman has relied upon the overall design and design standards required as part of the planned unit development application.The design and design standards may not be altered without consent of the City. 9. A notice prepared by the City must be filed concurrently with the amended plat so that it will appear on title reports. It must read substantially as follows The Amended Plat of Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana known as the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development (PUD) are subject to specific design standards, unique building setbacks and heights, parking requirements and uses. These standards may be found in [insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development and are in place of the general development standards of the same subject of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Cottonwood and Ida PUD approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process.Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. 10. The applicant must execute at the Gallatin County Clerk&Recorder's Office prior to approval of the final Planned Unit Development, a waiver of right-to-protest creation of a City-wide special district for parks and trail, which would provide a mechanism for the fair and equitable assessment of costs for City parks and trails. 11.The offsite parking agreement must be for a minimum term of 25 years and must be completed, executed and filed prior to subsequent site plan approval. 12.The offsite parking agreement must be incorporated into the property owners' association documents as a required responsibility of the association along with the requirement to assess for and pay any required fees to satisfy the long term offsite parking agreement. 13. Prior to planned unit development final plan approval the applicant must provide the following modified historic property record documentation for the demolition of the existing structure at 620 E. Cottonwood Street: Property address, legal location, architectural description, digital interior and exterior elevation photographs, site map,and a quadrangle map.A modified completion of the Montana Historic Property 561 18516 Staf f Report for thOotton wood and Ida Planned Unit Deveoment Page 17 of 35 Record is a documentation of the current structure conditions and not an analysis of the historic integrity of property. The modified property card will be housed permanently online on the City's Architecture Inventory Map. 14.A deed restriction requiring affordable housing in the applicable amount proposed for planned unit development performance per the definition in BMC 38.700.020 must be placed on Lot A, underlying buildings 1, 2, and 6. 15. If not already filed for the subject site, the applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Street improvements to East Aspen Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage b. Street improvements to Ida Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage c. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage d. Street improvements to East Tamarack Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage e. Street improvements to East Peach Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage f. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage g. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Tamarack Street h. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Peach Street i. Intersection improvements to Front Street and East Aspen Street j. Intersection improvements to Front Street and Ida Avenue The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to final PUD approval. 16.The intersections of East Aspen Street and Front Street and Ida Street and Front Street must be reconfigured to meet the City's minimum design standard. The intersections must be improved with the first phase of development. The City's Engineering Department may approve an alternative design incorporating the existing park provided the City Community Development Department and Parks Department support the alternative design. An alternative design must be approved prior to final PUD approval. SECTION 4-REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS 1. BMC 38.220.050.A final approved weed control plan must be submitted prior to planned unit development final plan approval. 562 18516 Staff Report for thA ttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develpment Page 18 of 35 2. BMC 220.080. Irrigation water. Clarify proposed water demand for irrigation system. Clarify the nature of the existing well and water right to support the new demand. Provide letter from DNRC confirming water right or intent to issue right to support the project prior to approval of the planned unit development final plan. 3. BMC 38.220.300 and 310.The property owners' association documents must include the requirements of Section 38.220.300 and 320.The proposed documents must be finalized and recorded with the planned unit development final plan. 4. BMC 38.230.020.A and C. a subsequent site plan application is required to be reviewed and approved for all phases of this development prior to building permit issuance. 5. BMC 38.270.030.D For concurrent construction provide a full response to the required items in Section 38.270.030.D BMC. The concurrent construction response was provided, but not in accordance with the required section. Provide response to PUD concurrent construction and finalize all of the required code elements prior to the approval of the planned unit development final plan, approval of concurrent construction and prior to building permit issuance. 6. BMC 38.410.060.B.4 Encroachments proposed in required ten foot private utility easement areas required along all streets. No written approval from all utility companies is provided as required. The current and entire list of utility companies operating in Montana can be attained from the Montana Public Service Commission. Provide approval for encroachment prior to approval of planned unit development final plan. 7. BMC 38.420.030 Cash in lieu of land dedication for parkland. Cash in lieu of parkland has not been paid. The cash in lieu amount due is required to be paid prior to subsequent site plan approval. B. BMC 38.430.040.A.3 outlines the review and approval process for the planned unit development final plan. Final plan review and approval. The final plan must be in compliance with the approved preliminary plan and/or development guidelines. Upon approval or conditional approval of a preliminary plan and the completion of any conditions imposed in connection with that approval, an application for final plan approval may be submitted. For approval to be granted, the final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. This means that all conditions imposed by the city commission as part of its approval of the preliminary plan have been met and: The final plan does not change the general use or character of the development; The final plan does not increase the amount of improved gross leasable non- residential floor space by more than five percent, does not increase the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent and does not exceed the amount of any density bonus approved with the preliminary plan; The final plan does not decrease the open space and/or affordable housing provided; The final plan does not contain changes that do not conform to the requirements of this chapter, excluding properly granted deviations, the applicable objectives and criteria of section 38.430.100, or other objectives or criteria of this chapter.The final plan must not contain any changes which would allow increased 563 18516 Staff Report for thottonwood and Ida Planned Unit DeveAent Page 19 of 35 deviation/relaxation of the requirements of this chapter; and the final plat, if applicable, does not create any additional lots which were not reviewed as part of the preliminary plan submittal. Final plan approval.The final plan may be approved if it conforms to the approved preliminary plan in the manner described above. Prior to final plan approval,the review authority may request a recommendation from the DRB, DRC,ADR staff, or other entity regarding any part of a proposed final plan. 9. BMC 38.520.070 Location and design of service areas. No detailed service areas identified for gas and electric entrance locations into the buildings or proposed methods to separate and mitigate impacts as required. Show gas and electric locations with the true size and extent of all proposed meters as required per SP1 on entire site and the proposed locations for private utility entrance locations into the buildings. Planned unit development final plan must provide clear information on utility entrances into each building and demonstrate compliance with this code section with the subsequent site plan. 10. BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Provide site plan for offsite parking that demonstrates the proposed lot meets all requirements of the BMC and the off-site parking code section. Clarify the uses proposed to utilize the offsite parking and provide exhibit showing-compliance with distance requirements per use. Provide draft long term parking agreement or draft deed restriction in order to demonstrate compliance with BMC 38.540.070.6 with planned unit development final plan. 11. BMC 38.550.050.I. Irrigation plans are required to be submitted with the PUD open space landscape plan with the subsequent site plan application. 12.BMC 38.550.060.A.1.The PUD open space landscape plan must meet the requirements of 23 performance points and be finalized and completed with the subsequent site plan application. 13.BMC 38.400.050.A1.The property owner's association must maintain the proposed on street angled parking allowed on East Cottonwood Street including snow plowing and maintenance of the parking surfaces. The property owners' association documents must include language to this effect and be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval. 14.BMC 38.400.010.A.8 The existing satellite dish encroaching into the emergency access route must be removed prior to final PUD approval to ensure emergency services are not inhibited. 15. BMC 38.400.090.D.2 The applicant has indicated that the emergency vehicle access road will only be utilized by emergency service, as such the City's access standards do not apply provided the following are met: a. The property owners association documents continue language describing the accesses may only be utilized be emergency services.The language must be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval. 564 18516 Staff Report for thet ttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develtment Page 20 of 35 b. City approved barricades are placed at both the north and south access points c. The street vision triangles for the north and south access points be removed from the final PUD submittal 16. BMC 38.400.100.0 Street vision triangles shown on the preliminary PUD submittal exceed the City's requirements.The final PUD submittal must correctly show the City's street vision triangles prior to approval. 17.BMC 38.410.060.A An amended plat must be completed prior to final PUD approval for the proposed changes to the lots. a. The public utility easements along the property street frontages must be provided using the City's standard language prior to final PUD approval. No encroachments may be permitted without the approval from the utility companies registered with the Montana Public Service Commission. b. The public access easements for required public sidewalks located outside.of the right-of-way must be provided using the City's standard language prior to final PUD approval. c. A public drainage easement must be provided for the drainage infrastructure supporting the public right-of-way which is located inside of the property. The easement must be provided, reviewed, and approved by the City prior to final PUD approval. 18.BMC 38.410.070.A.1 Certified water and sewer design reports must be provided prior to final PUD approval. 19.BMC 38.410.080.A A certified drainage report for the public right-of-way drainage must be reviewed and approved by the City prior final PUD approval. a. The applicant must submit a stormwater maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater infrastructure for review and approval prior to final PUD approval. The approved maintenance plan be included within the property owner's associate document prior to final PUD approval. 20.BMC 38.430.070.A a.All public infrastructure,both on and offsite,must be installed with the first phase of development. SECTION 5 -STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. 565 18516 Staff Report for thattonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develoment Page 21 of 35 Applicable Plan Review Criteria,Section 38.230.100,BMC. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not in any way create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. In considering applications for plan approval under this title,the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy Yes. The property has a future land use designation of Industrial and is zoned NEHMU, Northeast Historic Mixed Use. The proposed residential units, office and restaurant uses and artisan manufacturing uses increase the intensity of commercial uses and the density of residential uses beyond the existing development pattern.The change in intensity is anticipated by the growth policy in areas of the city with adequate infrastructure.The project is in conformance to and consistent with the City's adopted growth policy, the Bozeman Community Plan, including the following goals and objectives: Goal LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City, efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work,and minimizes sprawl. The NEHMU district has a distinct sense of place,this project contributes to an existing and expanding mixed use area and allows people to live in close proximity to work, public and private basic services and minimizes sprawl. Objective LU-1.4 Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design. This project provides additional density of residential and commercial use while respecting the context of the mixed use area.The change in scale is allowable with the design presented as it has human scale and is compatible with the district with building sized within their context and integrated into the neighborhood. Objective LU-2.3: Encourage redevelopment and intensification,especially with mixed uses, of brownfields and underutilized property within the City consistent with the City's adopted standards. This project includes mixed uses and increase residential density and is proposed on underutilized property in an ongoing and developing mixed use district. Objective E-4.2: Promulgate efficient land use practices. 566 18516 Staff Report for thettonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develt ent Page 22 of 35 This project promulgates efficient land use practices and provides a high net residential density and FAR with office, manufacturing and restaurant uses, while adding a significant amount of usable open space area that can be used by the entire community. Objective C-2.S Explore and encourage innovative parking solutions for both residential and commercial projects including parking best practices, expanding parking districts,cash in lieu of parking and design guidelines for structured parking. This project proposes a parking reduction, structured parking integrated into the building design and offsite parking that will allow the project to provide an intensity of use today while having the ability to adapt to the changing transportation infrastructure in town including autonomous vehicles, ridesharing, car sharing, and increased transit service. Goal H-1: Promote an adequate supply of safe, quality housing that is diverse in type,density,cost,and location with an emphasis on maintaining neighborhood character and stability. This project provides additional quality housing at high density in an area that has historically included smaller residential low density uses. More recent infill projects in this neighborhood have included apartment uses over mixed commercial uses. This project will add to the neighborhood character and the stability of this area. Residential uses provide additional eyes on the street and have a twenty four hour presence that will make the district safer and enhance the overall neighborhood. For more information on the growth policy designation please see Appendix A. 2.Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations Yes. The project, if approved,will conform to the Bozeman Municipal Code other than the requested relaxations.There are no known documented violations of the BMC for this property. Code provisions are provided related to final planned unit development plan approval and subsequent site plan approval. 3.Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances,and regulations Yes. The proposed uses of the site are consistent with the allowed uses of the NEHMU district with the additional of the apartment building use. No specific conflicts have been identified.Additional steps will be required including but not limited to final payment for cash in lieu of water rights, approval of the final planned unit development, subdivision exemption to realign and aggregate the underlying lots, dedication of the utility easements, construction of infrastructure, PUD final plan documents and application, site plan approval and building permits.The Building Division of the Department of Community Development will review the requirements of the 567 18516 Staff Report for theOtton wood and Ida Planned Unit Devef)ment Page 23 of 35 International Building Code for compliance at the time of building permit application. Conditions of approval and code provisions are provided related to these issues. Condition of approval 1 requires full compliance with all applicable code requirements. 4.Conformance with special review criteria for applicable permit type as specified in article 2 Yes. The CUP and PUD criteria are reviewed below. The project meets the requirements and criteria as presented. S.Conformance with the zoning provisions of article 3, including permitted uses, form and intensity standards and requirements,applicable supplemental use criteria,and wireless facilities and/or affordable housing provisions if applicable Yes. The uses are permitted in the NEHMU district with the addition of apartment building uses requested through relaxation. Form and intensity standards are met with the proposal other than the proposed relaxations for the front setback and zero lot line conditions,lot coverage and building heights.Affordable housing is proposed in compliance with the PUD performance standards and will be confirmed through the planned unit development final plan process. Condition of approval 14 requires a deed restriction to assure the applicability of the affordable housing long term is proposed. The north half of the property includes four multi use storage and warehouse buildings constructed beginning in 1960.All buildings on the north half of the property are proposed for demolition. The south half of the site includes a grain warehouse building constructed in 1930.The grain warehouse is proposed to remain and be adaptively reused through the site development process for use as a restaurant/community building.Condition of approval 13 is related to documentation of the grain warehouse prior to modifications to the building. 6. Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4, including transportation facilities and access, community design and element provisions, and park and recreational requirements Yes. The proposed streets meet standards with the proposed relaxations. East Aspen Street, East Cottonwood Street and North Ida Avenue are required to be improved with this project. The proposed parking is to be met with reductions allowed through relaxation of the parking requirements. Pedestrian access is provided from the street directly through and into the project.The primary entrances into each building are connected to the City's sidewalk system. Perimeter street frontage sidewalks are provided on every perimeter street in conformance to standards. The lots and block meet standards,water and sewer is provided to each lot through mains within the city owned rights of way. The applicant will be constructing water mains to support the site. Site surface drainage generally meets standards at this level in the design for the streets 568 18516 Staff Report for thettonwood and Ida Planned Unit Devel*ent Page 24 of 35 and development. Cash in lieu of water rights is proposed and will be paid with the final site plan for site development. The applicant proposes to pay cash in lieu of parkland in conformance with standards, capped at twelve dwelling units per acre.The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Committee supports the use of cash in lieu for this project and recommends approval. Small encroachments are proposed into the required front setback utility easements. Condition of approval 5 requires the establishment of utility easements to serve the property and the surrounding utility grid. Code provision 6 requires approval of the utility holders prior to final approval of the encroachments. Concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, East Cottonwood Street and North Ida Avenue and the associated sewer and water mains is proposed.The Development Review Committee reviewed the request for concurrent construction with the understanding that the applicant agrees to standards and to complete the requirements in BMC 38.270.030.D with the planned unit development final plan and prior to building permit issuance.The Development Review Committee recommends concurrent construction be approved with all the required code elements. 7.Conformance with the project design provisions of article 5, including compatibility with, and sensitivity to,the immediate environment of the site and adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development; design and arrangement of the elements of the plan; landscaping; open space; lighting, signage; The development is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to, building mass and height, landscaping, orientation of parking and building placement on the site. The buildings comply with permanence in building materials,building quality, architectural integration, neighborhood identity, and orientation of parking and service areas. The general approach to landscaping meets standards. The design of the plan is consistent with the existing natural topography. The site will be raised to allow the inclusion of underground parking. There are no water bodies or significant existing vegetation on site. A general comprehensive signage is proposed in conformance with standards. Parking is proposed to be reduced via a relaxation for both residential and commercial uses. 96 parking spaces are proposed in an underground parking structure and 72 parking spaces are proposed offsite for the non-residential uses. 32 on street spaces are proposed for residential use. Prior to reductions the project would have required 255.3 parking spaces,with reductions the required parking is proposed at 166.1 parking 569 18516 Staff Report for theettonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develpment Page 25 of 35 spaces. 200 parking spaces are proposed to be provided through a combination of onsite, offsite and on street as outlined above.The offsite parking must have a long term lease established prior to final approval of the site plan and be integrated into the property owners association documents as a required element per conditions of approval 11 and 12. 8. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives set forth in articles 4-6, including the enhancement of the natural environment, watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats; and if the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area Yes. Pervious pavers are proposed to treat stormwater from the development. This is in compliance with best practices for Low Impact Development.The approach to the stormwater system meets code standards.The final review of the stormwater system will occur with the site plan review. The development is adjacent to a small public park and climbing boulder. No significant impact to the park is anticipated from this development. 9.Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of article 4 and article 6 Yes. No streams, floodplains, critical plant communities or wetlands exist on site. 10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties Public comment has been received on this application.As of the writing of this report there were eight public comments received. Seven were in favor of the application and 570 18516 Staff Report for theOttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develipment Page 26 of 35 one was not in favor of the application citing reduced setbacks, parking reductions and increased building height. 11.If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b.The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming The property must be configured through the applicable subdivision review process to relocate and aggregate common lot boundaries prior to the approval of the final PUD plan. Condition 4 is related to this issue. 12. Phasing of development The project is proposed to be constructed in one phase. Concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, East Cottonwood Street and North Ida Avenue and the associated sewer and water mains is proposed. The Development Review Committee reviewed the request for concurrent construction with the understanding that the applicant agrees to standards and to complete the requirements in BMC 38.270.030.1)with the planned unit development final plan and prior to building permit issuance. The Development Review Committee recommends concurrent construction be approved with all the required code elements. Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria, Section 38.230.110,BMC, E. In addition to the review criteria of section 38.230.100, the review authority shall, in approving a conditional use permit, determine favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards, spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity; The site is adequate. The proposed buildings, site design, pedestrian connectivity, open space and mix of uses will enhance the neighborhood. Landscaped areas are coordinated with adjoining properties and within the proposed development. The landscape design will improve the street frontages of the site.The reduced setbacks proposed through relaxation relate well to the historic building placements within the vicinity.All parking is proposed either in an underground structure or offsite which 571 18516 Staff Report for theOttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deveoment Page 27 of 35 provides for an uninterrupted streetscape for pedestrians and the addition of on street parking. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof, No adverse impacts to abutting properties have been identified. The construction of East Aspen Street and the reconstruction and completion of North Ida Avenue and East Cottonwood Street will improve safety for vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians which promotes public health and safety. General welfare will be promoted through a variety of apartment types which will provide a variety of housing options for area residents. The provision of additional office, manufacturing and restaurant uses to the districts promotes general welfare by providing an expansion and additional density to the mixed of uses in the NEHMU.The development serviced by the existing municipal sanitary sewer and water systems promotes public health by protecting groundwater from degradation associated with on-site septic systems and domestic wells. Stormwater will be managed in pervious pavers and other retention facilities to filter out sediment and treat runoff. 3.That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use; b.Special yards,spaces and buffers; c.Special fences, solid fences and walls; d.Surfacing of parking areas; e. Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f.Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g. Regulation of signs; h.Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise,vibrations and odors; j. Regulation of hours for certain activities; k.Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; 1. Duration of use; m. Requiring the dedication of access rights; and 572 18516 Staff Report for thetttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Devetment Page 28 of 35 n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner. The requirements of the DRC review and the proposed conditions outlined in this report,the future covenants,the maintenance plans and project design guidelines associated with the project will address these areas. F. In addition to all other conditions,the following general requirements apply to every conditional use permit granted: 1.That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure; and 2.That all of the conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use,shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing,and shall be recorded as such with the county clerk and recorder's office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits,final plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. The necessary recording of documents will be addressed as part of the final PUD plan process. Conditions 3, 7, 8, and 9 are related to this issue. Planned Unit Development Review Criteria,Section 38.430.090.E,BMC. The application presents the applicant's response to these criteria. 2. In addition to the criteria for all site plan and conditional use reviews,the following criteria will be used in evaluating all planned unit development applications. a.All development.All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against,and comply with,the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory"all development" group. (1)Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigation companies,fire protection, electricity,flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Yes, except for those standards proposed for relaxation the application conforms and in some areas exceeds standards. (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Yes. The site has been substantially disturbed by development and previous land uses and does not include significant natural vegetation.There will be substantial placement 573 18516 Staff Report for thet ttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deve*ent Page 29 of 35 of new vegetation within the site open spaces and perimeter street frontage.A code provision requires a final weed control plan with the planned unit development and further landscaping must be provided in accordance with code requirements with the subsequent site plan application. (3)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient,functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes. The proposal is cohesive and has a variety of coordinating elements ranging from efficient circulation, underground structured parking, integrated architecture between buildings, presentations of building fronts to the streets, private residential open spaces, open spaces available to the public,and multiple landscape configurations. Condition of approval 6 requires the recordation of public access easement in order to finalize all publicly accessible plaza and circulation areas as presented in the preliminary plans. (4)Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks;selection and placement of landscape materials;and/or use of renewable energy sources;etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Yes. The project proposes to construct to a LEED ND designation. LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND),where "LEED" stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a United States-based rating system that integrates the principles of smart growth, urbanism and green building into a national system for neighborhood design. LEED certification provides independent, third-party verification that a development's location and design meet accepted high levels of environmentally responsible, sustainable development.The LEED-ND system is a collaboration between the United States Green Building Council,the Congress for the New Urbanism and the Natural Resources Defense Council.A reduction in parking will require alternative modes of transportation be utilized by residents, employees, and customers of the developments. This will encourage enhanced transit to the area. (S)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Yes. The project is design to allow a diversity of residential types and configurations, many ground floor units have access to outdoor spaces for their own use which provide a public private separation for their units.Along the perimeter streets the residential units along the frontages are raised up above the sidewalk level to a varying degree to provide a transitional space between the public street and the private units. The 574 18516 Staff Report for thetttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deveoment Page 30 of 35 development complies with the interior special residential block frontage for all units. Landscaping is provided along the streetscape and within the development that will provide additional privacy.All vehicular access to the site is via the underground parking structure that will generally only be used by the residents, city services and their private service providers. (6)Park land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by section 38.420.020? Yes. Parkland is provided per code requirements via cash in lieu of dedication. Open space is provided for each residential building in compliance with standards. Conditions of approval 10 requires that a parks and trails district waiver be provided with the planned unit development final plan in accordance with BMC 38.420.100. (7)Performance.All PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points. Yes.With a PUD, Section 38.430.090.E.2.a.7 requires at least 20 performance points for the subject property.There are 11 options provided in the UDC to meet this requirement. Points can be met using any combination of on-site and off-site open space or other options listed in the code. The Preliminary PUD must specify how the performance points are being met. Open space provisions for phased PUD developments: If a project is to be built in phases, each phase shall include an appropriate share of the proposed recreational, open space, affordable housing and other site and building amenities of the entire development used to meet the requirements of section 38.430.090.E.2.The appropriate share of the amenities for each phase shall be determined for each specific project at the time of preliminary approval and shall not be based solely upon a proportional or equal share for the entire site. The PUD is proposing to satisfy the performance requirements with credits for affordable housing (21), additional open space with public access (9.37), underutilized and Brownfield sites (6.67), LEED-ND (15) and low impact development plan (6).The tabulation is under the common open space section of the application narrative on page 25. The application satisfies the requirement with 58 performance points.The development exceeds standards. Conditions of approval, 6 and 14 are provided related to this issue in order to provide public access as proposed and to assure affordable housing is provided as required to achieve the performance points. 575 18516 Staff Report for thottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deve*ent Page 31 of 35 (8)Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad"to adjoining development? Yes the project will create new connections to the neighborhood around it with the construction of additional streets sidewalks and open spaces. c. Mixed Use. Planned unit developments in mixed-use areas (REMU, UMU, and NEHMU zoning districts) may include commercial, light industrial, residential and mixes of various primary and accessory uses.The particular types or combination of uses are determined based upon its merits,benefits,potential impact upon adjacent land uses and the intensity of development. (1)Is the project substantially consistent with the intent and purpose statements for the underlying zoning district? Yes. This neighborhood includes commercial uses, offices, manufacturing and housing. The intent of the northeast historic mixed-use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses. This PUD provides a creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses. This PUD proposes appropriate use of the land with a broad range of nonresidential and residential uses. (2)Is the project located adjacent or within proximity to an arterial or collector street that provides adequate access to the site? Yes. The project is located 300 feet from Peach Street, a collector street and 300 feet from Tamarack Street a collector street with both streets feeding into Rouse Avenue to the west the closest arterial street to the project. (3) Is the projection at least two acres of land? Yes, the site is 2.01 acres of land. (4) Do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD,pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities,streetscape, etc.? Yes, the overall site layout and design guidelines provide a comprehensive design that coordinates pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design and the utilization of open space and facilities. 576 18516 Staff Report for thefttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develpment Page 32 of 35 (5) Does the overall project achieve or exceed the FAR 'floor area ratios"envisioned for the underlying district? Yes. There is no designated FAR required in the NEHMU.The proposed total FAR of the development is 1.8 with 46 dwelling units to the acre. (6)Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? Yes. This development will contribute to the mixed use character in this area and the eclectic residential and nonresidential uses located in this neighborhood. (7) Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas which contain more than ten spaces? Yes.All parking spaces are accesses through the underground parking structure. The offsite parking proposed at the northwest corner of Wallace Avenue and East Aspen Street is within the distance requirements for off-site parking.. (8)Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the city growth policy? Yes.This project is an infill project on an underutilized site. (9) Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas(such as urban plazas, courtyards, landscaped areas, open spaces, or urban trails)for the use and enjoyment of those living in, working in or visiting the development? Yes. Private residential and publicly accessible open space are proposed for those living, working in or visiting the development. (10) Does the project provide for private outdoor areas(e.g.,private setbacks, patios and/or balconies, etc.)for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light,sun, ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Yes. Outdoor balconies and patios are proposed for many of the individual dwelling units. Shared green roof deck opens space is provided for the apartment residents in Buildings 1-2. Commercial open space is provided for the office use. (11) Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? Yes. Private and publicly accessible open space are proposed. The project is very close to the mountains to main street trail system. (12) Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and provide efficient public services and facilities? 577 18516 Staff Report for thefittonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deve#nent Page 33 of 35 Yes. Enhancements to this underutilized site and connection to city services will allow a high density residential development in close proximity to services, transit, recreation and employment opportunities. The project is being designed as a LEED-ND neighborhood. (13)If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and urban styles designed to address community-wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? Yes,Affordable housing a variety of housing types and urban styles are proposed.A deed restriction is required in order to provide long term availability. (14)Residential density bonus. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus(30 percent maximum) above the residential density of the zoning district or building type within which the project is located and which is set forth in division 38.310 of this chapter, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards(such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development?The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus is determined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation must be provided within the project. Those dwellings subject to division 38.380 must be excluded from the base density upon which the density bonus is calculated. Not applicable. No formal density bonus is proposed. APPENDIX A —PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The property is zoned NEHMU, Northeast Historic Mixed Use The intent of the northeast historic mixed-use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses.Standards for buffering between different land uses are deliberately not as high as standards elsewhere in the community as it is assumed that persons choosing to locate in this area are aware of the variety of possible adjacent land uses and have accepted such possibilities as both acceptable and desirable. It is expected that the lots within this district will continue to develop under a variety of uses which may increase or decrease in scope in any given portion of the district. The clear intent of this district is to support a mix and variety of non-residential and residential uses. Nothing in division 38.300 of this article 578 18516 Staff Report for thetttonwood and Ida Planned Unit Develliment Page 34 of 35 shall be interpreted to be discouraging or prejudicial to any listed use except as set forth as principal and conditional uses. Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as Industrial in the Bozeman Community Plan. This classification provides areas for the uses which support an urban environment such as manufacturing, warehousing, and transportation hubs. Development within these areas is intensive and is connected to significant transportation corridors. In order to protect the economic base and necessary services represented by industrial uses, uses which would be detrimentally impacted by industrial activities are discouraged. Although use in these areas is intensive, these areas are part of the larger community and shall meet basic standards for landscaping and other site design issues and be integrated with the larger community. In some circumstances, uses other than those typically considered industrial have been historically present in areas which were given an industrial designation in this growth policy. Careful consideration must be given to public policies to allow these mixed uses to coexist in harmony. APPENDIX B- OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Bangtail Partners LLC 1189 Tennessee Street, Unit 103, San Francisco, CA 94107 Applicant: Imperial Development LLC 33 North Black Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representatives:Thinktank Design Group Inc.33 North Black Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715 Report By: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager APPENDIX C-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 38.430.010. Intent. A. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development (PUD) concept, to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and general welfare, it shall be the intent of this chapter to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: 1. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with the city's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies; 2. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the city area; 3. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities; 579 ent Page 35 of 35 18516 Staff Report for thettonwood and Ida Planned Unit Deven r 4. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks; 5. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage, water quality and reduction of flood damage; 6. To, encourage patterns of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation, thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; 7. To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation; '8. To reduce energy consumption and demand; 9. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography; 10.To improve the design, quality and character of new development; 11.To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas; 12.To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of incompatible developments; 13.To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer, the neighborhood and the community as a whole; 14.To promote the efficient use of land resources, full use of urban services, mixed uses, transportation options,and detailed and human-scale design; and 15.To meet the purposes established in section 38.01.040. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Public Comment The Design Review Board (DRB) minutes February 27, 2019. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Committee email March 8, 2019. The Community Affordable Housing Board minutes March 13, 2019 Application 580 NOTICE OF A PUBCIC HEARING FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION S The City of Bozeman Depart- ment of Community Develop- ment is reviewing a Prelimi- nary Planned Unit Develop- ment (PUD) application re- questing permission to grant relaxations for a planned unit development and to develop existing lots, consisting of 2.06 acres within the NEHMU zoning district. The subject property is ad- -dressed as 615 East Cotton- wood Street and 720 North. Ida Avenue.The site is legal- ly described as Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addi- tion to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County,Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the Cottonwood and Ida Prelimi- nary Planned Unit Develop- ment Application 18516. The s development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings,an office building,a mixed use building including '.,artisan manufacturing and a restaurant,`buuaing.—i ne`pro:' posal includes four buildings. The largest building includes ' apartments, 64 units, and of- fices, 29,700 sq. ft., separat- ed horizontally over an under- ground,parking,structure con- sisting of 96 parking spaces. The other buildings on site in- clude a 12 unit apartment building, a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400•sq. ft. with 26 units above and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building:.The application in- cludes the concurrent con- struction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cotton- wood Street. The application .requests, that the city grant relax- ations to the following stan- dards: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application re- quests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application re- quests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. _ 3.'BMC 38.320.050 Foam and Intensity Standards. The ap- plication proposes to de- crease the required front set- back from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The ap- plication proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity.Standards. The ap- plication proposes to increase { the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45'to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The ap- plication proposes to increase ` the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40%to'45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Land- scape Block Frontage. The , application proposes to de- crease the required residen- tial transparency from a mini- mum 15%to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.E Store- front Block Frontage. The ap- plication proposes to de- crease the required commer- cial transparency from 60%to. 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Resi- dential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for ef- ficiency units from 1.25 spaces-per'unit`to'1 space- per unit. The application pro poses to reduce the require- ments for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Stan- dards. The application pro- poses to reduce all nonresi- dential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC.38.400.050.A.1 / Street Design. The applica- tion proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted ,designns,for,,local streets and instead construct ? East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. All reviews and processes are pursuant to Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). The City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the planned unit development on Monday, March 25, 2019 in the Commission Meeting Room in Bozeman City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman,MT at 6:00 p.m. The City Invites the public ' to comment in writing and to attend the public hearing (s). Written comments may f be directed to: City of Boze- man Department of Commu- nity Development, ATTN: Bri- an Krueger, PC Box. 1230, , Bozeman;MT 59771'1230,of emailed to agenda@boze- man.net. Summary data on this application kare available at www.bozeman.neVplan- ning. Select 'Project Docu- ments' and navigate to appli- cations 17231 and 17232. The full applications may be reviewed in the City of Boze- man Department of Commu- nity Development, Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accom- modations for disabilities, please contact the ADA Coor- dinator Mike Gray, at 582- 3232 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). Please reference Application 18516 In any I-correspondence. _ _ j t 13A LP cufumad 1DP Pvpi_ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 364571 1874491 STATE OF MONTANA ) )SS. CITY OF BOZEMAN_ROBIN CROUGH County of Gallatin ) PO BOX 1230 BOZEMAN MT 59771-1230 fI � il being duly sworn, deposes and says; that he/she is legal ad clerk of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and that the notice here unto annexed #102424 - HEARING PLANNED NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARIN has been correctly published in the regular and entire issues of every number of said paper for 2 insertions. Said notice was published on: 03/03/2019 03/10/2019 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of March , 2019 Notary Public or the;tana of Montana Residing at Belgrade, KESSLY LOVEC ss•• °� . . -,,, Notary Public 1AFI/,4 :for the State of Montana Residing at: AL., Belgrade, Montana s My Commission Expires: >•'_�`� MpC�. January 31,2023 I I • z D D n N Cn N O �O i ■ nw o and Ida PreHmoonaryPUD Planning C���� �o�l 717 • Proposed mixed use , residential/commercial Planned Unit " • Development ° �� I1 •° ;r `�� 2 acre site east of North Wallace Avenue, bound by East Aspen, Ida CID _ ,t ,PF. .T � Avenue and East Cottonwood Street. '� [r�IlNtiI1�1—:III IIt711 � .. r, • Zoned NEHMU, Neighborhood . n n Conservation Overlay District iig,, f:au •ro���Yin sT �"��V � T ,I� • Bozeman Community Plan map designation-Industrial 9 y1 r T •� (�a �. .f �r�� t3 • Demolition of most structures on site O O F� � Q CoNonwood and Wo PreHomhary PUD Planning 1111t 46 • 4 buildings a - 64 apartment units/29,700 sq. ft office over parking structure, 96 parking spaces • 12 unit apartment building, artisan , . - ��'`�' `" " mixed use building 26 units with ._� a+w. �4" 5,400 sq. ft commerical • 2, 150 sq. ft restaurant buildingF: .<��. .,,H� It f -�w"b 4 DMPq.cb-I.clbn .,P40da L.. is ZWAV h..w O O B (a m Planning E TAMARACK ST _ � ----I. ®ASPF rj E C09T0\\\'OOD ST • leprne O PMMIrg ProJ.cts el.etkn Parcels Roads y Cit yf ' 'City Limns p Pw-v Projrcb Community Plan Fulwe land Use _7 Residential Resider"Emo mis Mixed Use Suburban R*3wwttl Repknd Cammercial and Service* CommuM y c*m Caemuniry Cammarcial Mbad Use Business Park Mbod Use �^ � �lnaustrw �E ZPEACHl�ST Public 1mtRvlions p Parks.Open Space and Recreational Laws !� Other Public labs presents Rural j — — C� O o� Z7= � Planning r E TAMAR,CK S'f E ASPEN ST*� E ASPE\ ST ' r Legend EIP Pf*m selection Cky Urrift(1fl/18) x - CD Mixed Use �► -� - � �� RestsuranINSar 41E CUgITp\\\'C)tlU S7 • Canrnerciel R*W Sales.Serocee.Bank6 HoterOA&.d Q Commor"Auto • .Adn*kt*WmV rofessionel K= LipM Manufaclur4p O Cw Course Pax or abo ww n Space Q Conaervetion Ennt 15 0 Church Pubk Faddy 1 SdrodtEducetbnat Fack4y Skgb-Household ReddenfW - UD QrpleAThplex Residential - I C3 MuWHmmehold Reeldarrtial F, M HomsWobi a Hark �in 0 obile s ?Undewbped E PE,Ct( ST • 0 vacant }r. Parcels Roods AVoys . City l.knds Plerrrp PraNas - �� MT BOZ E MAN Planning j LUMBER DISTRIBUTOR T AI HISTORIC DEPOT NORTHERN PACIFIC FORMER + •" RAILWAY • TECH ' BREWERY OFFICES SITE / FFICES'& = INDUSTRIAL , �l -STUDIOS _ POCKET •� _ _ , PARK E ASPEN �} `•�;r ARTISAN i - BED& MFR.,' BREAKFAST z - tt w». ARTISAN SINGLE-FAMILY SINGLE-FAMILY FR.� ; MI MILL j i « HRESIDENCES RESIDENCES' 1 C� + E.COTTONWOOD ST. All SINGLE-FAM ul ILY, :RESIDENCES - CAFE MULTI-FAMILY• i -, a RESIDENTIALLIJ EER&17VW 3 _ ISTRIBUTOR r 1 OFFlCES&� BIKE - STUDIOS SHOP " BAKERY .OFFICES& I, I i - SSTUDIOS. [_.,. E.PEACH ST. _ ,. _ TO DOWNTOWN _ ! SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES OR COMMERCIAL ® BUS DEPOT Tw ';; MT BOZEMAN Planning °� " "" i °°���. °� i—i �,•"M'^� 4 buildings M N•fH�[im i /, t� 64 apartment ' 0• "` units/29 700 sq. ft 0 . ; office over parking structure, r - M 6 nuk= -----_--- ,�,. 6M - �,,,:,' • - -;--- 96 parking spaces 12 unit apartment building, mixed use building 16 units and 5,400 Tfin i• sq. ft. commercial• FOOTPIM&MVi -----, � 2, 150 sq. ft a restaurant building 72 parking spaces offsite, 32 ' — - on street BOZEMAN MT Planning - FH �_rujm ° °°° ! tj - - - ----------- -----------------�;up., nof f rrawc� N�f � ❑ �� V - '� 'i _Ll 1 ------------ ---------------------------- I F]E]�D �� ❑ CID BOZEMAN MT Planning wl!0 OWN rf 1 sw -730 I e n I [�-LE 1 I !1 a-- �i BOZEMAN MT 17 Planning RESMEWIAL COMMERCIAL ARTISAN MFR. COMMUNITY _ 8 i , • i CIO • "" .•ns •••w ati.�e�nss.f, �� r � �m v o. � •e.o.�i>+�a�r� T wwi• 77 . m ml ! '3 L L`' -I C jju FL JUL , g` �.a L L4 6UIUUBld IM 1;/ H El ��z (a a Planning I , Id N7.:,ZONTAE AN3 CCRF,.::a,EL: (`� `" 1` -- n ! ' KstALRC I* vLRP^_A-`—,N METAL :NG ANJf:,N� :..HACh1 - - l fill, ., . � � r = n _ � _ fit • t f7 ' l v — BOZEMAN MT Planning • Im t 4 �.. _ 1 Ct �1 { �'� 5 ` rill WAUNX AK FM ra � wa~d rF�R �m�a w I 1 rwo t A I WAK - I oo. Y001lOwN A[,FO�TOOI O00 laMNAhYtO MO�QN�INM 1 Lpr[i¢Cnow f-w�fdnM 1 ■DOA I +�� �tD01 SFACt 8=3 _ _ I .� �- ..R�.. � �.,. • 1 ---- � 1 —1 ICR N'ALALLAK + IACU.SS I �N OnN 10��t I A00 Owta• Ij`, MOO MOO 1 pAAK • — �. •. - 1 '�I � ww'osra t uaNsa+N . !'ao�m�at l9Mi NNmYtO N3!•.i OR4Rr tl W.kYCIgM•EM�NORM • • I p t ! — 4�" _ -� _ o 0 0 _cam -� ,i si 3 of o 0 a - 17 Ye i J I 'M y- -,OIL M V r 1 — , f i � f } Y� T 3 BOZEMAN MT Cottonwood and Ida PUD Relaxations Planning 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the • allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38:320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase I the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. i 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. t 8. . BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. i 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. MT BOZ E MAN Cottonwood and Ida PUD Planning 18516 { 4 Public Comment • Project was publicly noticed twice in Bozeman Daily Chronicle, posted on- site and mailed to property owners within 200 feet. ' • 20 public comments have been received. • 11 in favor, 9 not in favor Positive comments: infill, compliant with city policies, affordable housing, ' density, character of the neighborhood i • Negative comments: parking, inadequate streets, snow storage, character of the neighborhood, relaxations too great-apartments, parking, setbacks, height BOZEMAN MT Cottonwood and Ida PUD planning 18516 . i Review Criteria -Q I • Application meets criteria-Performance met through affordable housing, open space, LID, LEED-ND, brownfield development, 58/20 required pts. i Recommendation • DRB recommends approval • CAHAB recommends approval of affordable housing performance • RPAB recommends cash in lieu of parkland for the project • Overall recommendation is for conditional approval with applicable code provisions O I� 1 IL • . SL O MT BOZ E-.M AN Planning 4 buildings r� -,-� � ; ,,�-���.�_��� � ,. -" --F�-�• «��-- ' p 64 apartment u n its/29 700 s B '�-' ---- q ft '` ' i [ office over JC ; parking structure, ---------- -;---�' 96 parking + w?A . ImIIK AP , roonv�mwa rooiwen:i �r --- I spaces '.UwI I 12 unit apartment building, artisan c mixed use �- "" - V -- -- - --- § ' ; building 16 units LJ I' _Bann I • i � -i ; over 5,400 sq. ft roornmrr:L=u I_ - pq �• ' restaurant building . 72 parking spaces offsite, 32 - - on street CITY OF BOZEMAN .. 5}� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �' � '� O •► 20 EAST OLIVE STREET .,._ . . : P.O. BOX 1230 USA BOZEMIAN, MT 59771 p 4 CANDLELIGI'T^�BOZEMAN. 5.51 f E :i Y IVL11 D�L1V�1cti6f_r AS ADDRESSED i T�W9 SC: 59771.323030 "2335 -18578- @�#- i1Z _ e St ±1±�tl•tli'tiittl}1t1,11Hliit%,llit tjitit{t�1 Jii i j33��{ s i 80Z E 'dlr= MMT Community Development Noticing: Public Comment Newspaper Legal Ad Site Post Adjacent Owners Mailed Period 3/3/19 and 3/10/19 3/3/19 3/1/19 3/3/19 to 3 25 19 Decision: Authority and Decision The City Commission public hearing and decision is scheduled for Monday, March 25, 2019 in the Commission Meeting Room in Bozeman City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue, at 6:00 p.m. This application is evaluated against the Preliminary PUD criteria of sections 38.430 of the municipal code and associated standards.Approval or conditional approval may be granted if the decision maker determines all criteria are met. The public may comment orally at the public hearing or in writing at or prior to the public hearing regarding compliance of this application with the required criteria. Comments should identify the specific criteria of concern along with facts in support of the comment. During the notice period the City will continue review for compliance with applicable regulations. Written comments may be directed to: City of Bozeman Department of Community Development,ATTN: Brian Krueger, PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, or emailed to agenda@bozeman.net. Summary data on this application are available at www.bozeman.net/planning. Select'Project Documents' and navigate to application 17231 and 17232. The full application may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Community Development,Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, 582- 2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact the ADA Coordinator Mike Gray, at 582-3232 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). Please reference Application 18516 in any correspondence. - ::w � .'1'111i I11\1IIN111.1 - � _ej 4 f fffrrr "4101 r w.'s rr.. Z7J-`E I rt�i Ili}I, '-6. wh:'tom Page 1 of 2 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC NEARING FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Project Name: Cottonwood and Ida PUD Application: 18516 Summary: The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the Cottonwood and Ida Preliminary Planned Unit Development Application 18516. The development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings, an office building, a mixed use building including artisan manufacturing and a restaurant building. The proposal includes four buildings. The largest building includes apartments, 64 units, and offices, 29,700 sq. ft., separated horizontally over an underground parking structure consisting of 96 parking spaces. The other buildings on site include a 12 unit apartment building,a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400 sq. ft. with 26 units above and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building. The application includes the concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cottonwood Street. The application requests that the city grant relaxations to the following standards: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40%to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage.The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. Parcel size: 2.06 acres Location: 615 East Cottonwood Street and 720 North Ida Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Legal Description: Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. • w Brian Krueger From: Mitchell Overton Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 3:47 PM To: Brian Krueger Cc: 'Richard Shanahan'; 'Brian Close'; 'Katie Bills-Walsh' Subject: RE:Two PUD's for Parkland Review Brian: RPAB Sub Review motion, comments, and condition below. RPAB: please review for anything missing. 1) Cottonwood and Ida PUD 18516 request cash in lieu of parkland for.73 acres at the City's adopted per sq.ft. rate. a. Improvements/installation of parking area for Depot Park appropriate and aligns with future Front Street Path development and provides walkable access to Story Mill Spur and Story Mill Community Park. b. Open public movement through development site encouraged and inviting. c. .73 acres Developer proposed cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication at$1.50/sq.ft. =$47,6982 deemed acceptable. i. Motion passed for above three items 2. Bridger Vale PUD 17232 and subdivision 17231 request dedication of parkland with relaxations to park frontage and park frontage loss mitigation. a. Park entrance improvements with on street parking. b. Development of open space aggregated to Glen Lake Rotary Park. c. Dedicated parkland found acceptable with alley eliminating encroachment issues, property aggregated to Glen Lake Rotary Park, trail connecting into Glen Lake Rotary Park trail system, and condition of installation of pet waste station. i. Motion to approve park plan and parking relaxation approved with condition of installation of pet waste station in dedicated parkland. Mitchell J. Overton, MS, CPRP Director, Parks and Recreation Department City of Bozeman, MT (o)406-582-3222 (c)406-595-7020 www.bozeman.net BOZ E H1ANMT Rocks&Recreation From: Mitchell Overton Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:59 PM To: Richard Shanahan<rchard@shanahanarchitects.com>; 'Brian Close' <taxatty123@gmail.com>; Katie Bills-Walsh <katie.j.bills@gmail.com> Subject: FW:Two PUD's for Parkland Review 1 Brian Krueger From: Brian Krueger Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 4:12 PM To: Erik Nelson; 'Brian Caldwell' Subject: Cottonwood and Ida PUD advisory body continued review Hello, The City's Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Sub Committee will review your proposed cash in lieu for this project at its next meeting on Friday March 8, 2019 at the Professional Building Basement conference room at 2pm. The City's Community Affordable Housing Board will review your proposed project and affordable housing proposal at its next meeting on Wed. March 13, 2019 at City Hall in the Commission room at Sam. You are welcome to attend and present at these meetings. Brian Krueger I Development Review Manager,Community Development City of Bozeman 120 East Olive St.I P.O.Box 1230 1 Bozeman,MT 59771 406.582.2259 bkrueger@bozeman.net 1 www.bozeman.net 1 h0 • BOZEMAN Planning FROM: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: COTTONWOOD AND IDA PRELIMINARY PUD APPLICATION 18516 DATE: FEBRUARY 27,2019 Project Description:A Preliminary Planned Unit Development(PUD)application to allow a mixed residential and commercial development with relaxations to zoning regulations requested for apartment building use, building height, parking, street design, restaurant design, transparency, front setbacks and a request for concurrent construction. The site is located at 615 East Cottonwood Street and 720 North Ida Avenue. Recommendation:Staff has found that the project complies with requirements of Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code with conditions and code provisions to be satisfied with the final plan and is deeming the application adequate for further review. Section 2-RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report.These conditions are specific to the development. 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. The final planned unit development plan must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to the approval of any subsequent site plan. 3. The requested relaxations to the following sections are granted as proposed in the application materials and must be reflected in the final planned unit development plan, design guidelines and associated property owners' association documents as approved: a. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. b. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses.The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. c. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. d. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards.The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. e. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45'to 54'. Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TOD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZEMAN 10 Planning f. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40%to 45%. g. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15%to 8%. In. BMC 38.510.030.E Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60%to 30%. i. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards.The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. j. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards.The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. k. BMC.38.400.050.A.1 Street Design.The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. 4. Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana must be aggregated and/or the common boundaries of said lots must be reconfigured through the applicable subdivision review process to accommodate the project prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 5. Ten foot front setback utility easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans either through individual recordable documents or thorough the subdivision exemption review process prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 6. Public access easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans for all publicly accessible open space areas prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 7. No property may be removed from the covenants without written approval of the City of Bozeman. 8. The City of Bozeman has relied upon the overall design and design standards required as part of the planned unit development application.The design and design standards may not be altered without consent of the City. 9. A notice prepared by the City must be filed concurrently with the amended plat so that it will appear on title reports. It must read substantially as follows The Amended Plat of Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06,T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana known as the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development(PUD)are subject to specific design standards, unique building setbacks P.O. Box 1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZEMAN Planning and heights, parking requirements and uses.These standards may be found in [insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development and are in place of the general development standards of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Cottonwood and Ida PUD approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process. Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. 10. A signed and recorded waiver of right to protest a city-wide park maintenance district must be provided with the final planned unit development plan. 11. The offsite parking agreement must be for a minimum term of 25 years and must be completed, executed and filed prior to subsequent site plan approval. 12. The offsite parking agreement must be incorporated into the property owners' association documents as a required responsibility of the association along with the requirement to assess for and pay any required fees to satisfy the long term offsite parking agreement. 13. Prior to planned unit development final plan approval the applicant must provide the following modified historic property record documentation for the demolition of the existing structure at 620 E. Cottonwood Street: Property address, legal location, architectural description, digital interior and exterior elevation photographs, site map, and a quadrangle map. A modified completion of the Montana Historic Property Record is a documentation of the current structure conditions and not an analysis of the historic integrity of property. The modified property card will be housed permanently online on the City's Architecture Inventory Map. Section 3—REQUIRED CODE CORRECTIONS All references are to the Bozeman Municipal Code. Planning Division, Brian Krueger, bkrueger@bozeman.net, 582-2259 1. BMC 38.220.050.A final approved weed control plan must be submitted prior to planned unit development final plan approval. 2. BMC 220.080. Irrigation water. Clarify proposed water demand for irrigation system. Clarify the nature of the existing well and water right to support the new demand. Provide letter from DNRC confirming water right or intent to issue right to support the project prior to approval of the planned unit development final plan. 3. BMC 38.220.300 and 310.The property owners' association documents must include the requirements of Section 38.220.300 and 320.The proposed documents must be finalized and recorded with the planned unit development final plan. TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. h� • BOZEMAN Planning 4. BMC 38.230.020.A and C.a subsequent site plan application is required to be reviewed and approved for all phases of this development prior to building permit issuance. 5. BMC 38.270.030.11) For concurrent construction provide a full response to the required items in Section 38.270.030.D BMC.The concurrent construction response was provided, but not in accordance with the required section. Provide response to PUD concurrent construction and finalize all of the required code elements prior to the approval of the planned unit development concurrent construction and prior to building permit issuance. 6. BMC 38.410.060.B.4 Encroachments proposed in required ten foot private utility easement areas required along all streets. No written approval from all utility companies is provided as required.The current and entire list of utility companies operating in Montana can be attained from the Montana Public Service Commission. Provide approval for encroachment prior to approval of planned unit development final plan. 7. BMC 38.420.030 Cash in lieu of land dedication for parkland. Cash in lieu of parkland has not been paid.The cash in lieu amount due is required to be paid prior to subsequent site plan approval. 8. BMC 38.430.040.A.3 outlines the review and approval process for the planned unit development final plan. Final plan review and approval.The final plan must be in compliance with the approved preliminary plan and/or development guidelines. Upon approval or conditional approval of a preliminary plan and the completion of any conditions imposed in connection with that approval, an application for final plan approval may be submitted. For approval to be granted,the final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. This means that all conditions imposed by the city commission as part of its approval of the preliminary plan have been met and:The final plan does not change the general use or character of the development;The final plan does not increase the amount of improved gross leasable non-residential floor space by more than five percent, does not increase the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent and does not exceed the amount of any density bonus approved with the preliminary plan;The final plan does not decrease the open space and/or affordable housing provided;The final plan does not contain changes that do not conform to the requirements of this chapter, excluding properly granted deviations,the applicable objectives and criteria of section 38.430.100, or other objectives or criteria of this chapter.The final plan must not contain any changes which would allow increased deviation/relaxation of the requirements of this chapter; and the final plat, if applicable, does not create any additional lots which were not reviewed as part of the preliminary plan submittal. Final plan approval.The final plan may be approved if it conforms to the approved preliminary plan in the manner described above. Prior to final plan approval, the review authority may request a recommendation from the DRB, DRC,ADR staff, or other entity regarding any part of a proposed final plan. TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZEMAN Planning 9. BMC 38.520.070 Location and design of service areas. No detailed service areas identified for gas and electric entrance locations into the buildings or proposed methods to separate and mitigate impacts as required. Show gas and electric locations with the true size and extent of all proposed meters as required per SP1 on entire site and the proposed locations for private utility entrance locations into the buildings. Planned unit development final plan must provide clear information on utility entrances into each building and demonstrate compliance with this code section with the subsequent site plan. 10. BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Provide site plan for offsite parking that demonstrates the proposed lot meets all requirements of the BMC and the off-site parking code section. Clarify the uses proposed to utilize the offsite parking and provide exhibit showing compliance with distance requirements per use. Provide draft long term parking agreement or draft deed restriction in order to demonstrate compliance with BMC 38.540.070.6 with planned unit development final plan. 11. BMC 38.550.050.1. Irrigation plans are required to be submitted with the PUD open space landscape plan with the subsequent site plan application. 12. BMC 38.550.060.A.1.The PUD open space landscape plan must meet the requirements of 23 performance points and be finalized and completed with the subsequent site plan application. Engineering Division Comments,Griffin Nielsen,gnielsen@bozeman.net.582-2279 1. Final Engineering comments are pending. Fire Department;Scott Mueller smueller@bozeman.net 406-582-2353 1. "Fire Lane" signage must be installed on both side of the west side fire access drive in accordance with code section 2012 IFC D103.6. 2. Provide gates in lieu of bollards for west side fire access. Contact Fire Department for coordination. Solid Waste Division; Russ Ward rward@bozeman.net 406-582-3236 1. Provide final sanitation plan to solid waste for approval prior to planned unit development final plan submittal. 2. BMC 38.520.070.E Location and design of service areas. Service areas for trash service are not approved by the Sanitation Division.Service areas for all buildings must include staging areas and.safe and accessible locations for trash dumpster pick up. Clarify individuals responsible for moving the trash dumpsters to pickup area. Provide documentation in supplementary document noting this requirement(POA documents). NorthWestern Energy;Cammie Dooley;cammie.doolev@northwestern.com 1. Provide utility easements in coordination with site utility plan. P.O. Box 1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZEMAN Planning 2. Provide adequate space on each building to locate electric and gas meters with appropriate clearances. 3. Provide adequate clearance for all transformers. 4. Coordinate with NWE on final utility plan to be submitted with the planned unit development final plan. Reviewers: 1. Planning Division, Brian Krueger, bkrueger@bozeman.net, 582-2259 2. Engineering Division,Griffin Nielsen,gnielsen@bozeman.net,582-2279 3. Building Division; Bob Risk brisk@bozeman.net 406-582-2377 4. Parks and Recreation;Thom White;twhite@bozeman.net 406-582-3224 S. Sustainability Division;Natalie Meyer nmever@bozeman.net 406-582-2317 6. Solid Waste Division; Russ Ward rward@bozeman.net 406-582-3236 7. Water Conservation;Jessica Ahlstrom iahlstrom@bozeman.net 406-582-2265 8. Stormwater Division; Kyle Mehrens ikmehrens@bozeman.net 406-582-2270 9. Fire Department;Scott Mueller smueller@bozeman.net 406-582-2353 10. Water and Sewer Division;John Alston ialston@bozeman.net 406-582-3200 11. Forestry Division;Alex Nordquest;anordauest@bozeman.net 406-582-3205 12. Parking Division; Ed Meece;emeece@bozeman.net 406-582-2903 13. NorthWestern Energy; Cammie Dooley;cammie.doolev@northwestern.com Future Impact Fees- Please note that future building permit applications will require payment of the required transportation, water, sewer and fire impact fees according to the City of Bozeman adopted impact fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance. If you desire an estimate of the required impact fees according to current rates please contact the Department of Community Development and/or visit. Note: During preparation of the staff report for future applications, additional conditions of approval may be recommended based on comments and recommendations provided by other applicable review agencies involved with the review of the project. Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Page 1 of 2 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Project Name: Cottonwood and Ida PUD Application: 18516 Summary: The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the Cottonwood and Ida Preliminary Planned Unit Development Application 18516.The development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings, an office building, a mixed use building including artisan manufacturing and a restaurant building. The proposal includes four buildings. The largest building includes apartments, 64 units, and offices, 29,700 sq. ft., separated horizontally over an underground parking structure consisting of 96 parking spaces. The other buildings on site include a 12 unit apartment building, a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400 sq. ft. with 26 units above and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building. The application includes the concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cottonwood Street. The application requests that the city grant relaxations to the following standards: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage.The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15%to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60%to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards.The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. Parcel size: 2.06 acres Location: 615 East Cottonwood Street and 720 North Ida Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Legal Description: Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. BO6EMAUC1MT Community Development Noticing: Public Comment Newspaper Legal Ad Site Post Adjacent Owners Mailed Period 3/3/19 and 3/10/19 3/3/19 3/1/19 3/3/19 to 3 25 19 Decision: Authority and Decision The City Commission public hearing and decision is scheduled for Monday, March 25, 2019 in the Commission Meeting Room in Bozeman City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue, at 6:00 p.m. This application is evaluated against the Preliminary PUD criteria of sections 38.430 of the municipal code and associated standards.Approval or conditional approval may be granted if the decision maker determines all criteria are met. The public may comment orally at the public hearing or in writing at or prior to the public hearing regarding compliance of this application with the required criteria. Comments should identify the specific criteria of concern along with facts in support of the comment. During the notice period the City will continue review for compliance with applicable regulations. Written comments may be directed to: City of Bozeman Department of Community Development,ATTN: Brian Krueger, PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, or emailed to agenda@bozeman.net. Summary data on this application are available at www.bozeman.net/planning. Select'Project Documents' and navigate to application 17231 and 17232. The full application may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Community Development,Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, 582- 2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact the ADA Coordinator Mike Gray, at 582-3232 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). Please reference Application 18516 in any correspondence. 7- 7'T'T } f'�► r /'�11N tA i M( --�f �• w r �• AtltlA r k, t ..L,1 in w.auuu: M r}. :a. " IA Tr 4 ,epw Arc NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION The City of Bozeman Department of Community Development is reviewing a Preliminary Planned Unit Development(PUD) application requesting permission to grant relaxations for a planned unit development and to develop existing lots consisting of 2.06 acres within the NEHMU zoning district. The subject property is addressed as 615 East Cottonwood Street and 720 North Ida Avenue. The site is legally described as Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the Cottonwood and Ida Preliminary Planned Unit Development Application 18516. The development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings, an office building, a mixed use building including artisan manufacturing and a restaurant building. The proposal includes four buildings. The largest building includes apartments,64 units,and offices,29,700 sq.ft.,separated horizontally over an underground parking structure consisting of 96 parking spaces. The other buildings on site include a 12 unit apartment building, a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400 sq. ft. with 26 units above and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building. The application includes the concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cottonwood Street. The application requests that the city grant relaxations to the following standards: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards.The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10.BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11.BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. All reviews and processes are pursuant to Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). The City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the planned unit development on Monday, March 25, 2019 in the Commission Meeting Room in Bozeman City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, MT at 6:00 p.m. The City invites the public to comment in writing and to attend the public hearing(s). Written comments may be directed to: City of Bozeman Department of Community Development,ATTN: Brian Krueger, PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, or emailed to agenda@bozeman.net. Summary data on this application are available at www.bozeman.net/planning. Select'Project Documents' and navigate to applications 17231 and 17232. The full applications may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Community Development,Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact the ADA Coordinator Mike Gray, at 582-3232 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). Please reference Application 18516 in any correspondence. SUBMITTED THURSDAY212812019 FOR SUNDAYS, 31312019 and 311012019, LEGAL AD PUBLICATIONS. PLEASE PRINT BOLD WHERE INDICATED. PLEASE SEND AFFIDAVIT TO BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. MT BOZ E MAN WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2019 Cottonwood and Ida PreHominary PUD Design Review Board 18516 • Proposed mixed use �I residential/commercial Planned Unit , M-1 t Development �;': , • 2 acres site east of North Wallace Avenue, bound by East Aspen, Ida ®�eF9!1 E ASPEN ST Avenue and East Cottonwood Street. y • ; �• ice, 4 • Design Review Board required step in H M U �!� •� �' '�/ �� , ' RL ' �, P U D process Pill ?: r •; Zoned NEHMU, Neighborhood 1 � + ;�� Conservation Overlay District Is Bozeman Community Plan map designation-I ndustrialFMft -P2- • Demolition of most structures on site BM""�p"'°' 0 0 CoHonwood and Wa PUDPrOo 1mlonary Design Review Board 18516 • 4 buildings _------ _ -+' F TA\t A1G\CH ST TT • 64 apartment units/29 700 sq. ft office over parking structure, 96 parking P 9 p g spaces L^f'4` .' •—. r�` I. "�rat � ♦ 4'. • 12 unit apartment building, artisan , ^� r + ' ' mixed use building 26 units over & � C _ • _: • o 5,400 sq. ft �1 Irl • 2, 150 sq. ft restaurant building E('OTPO\\\'OGP ST - • _ ��y A BP�■a P� r 0 0 BOZEMAN Design Review Board E T 1�IARACK ST I i IN% E ASPS\ ST E ASPEN ST I ra r-� E CO'ITON 'OQU,ST Lepand OPT Idedion Parcels Roads OP-.*v Projects -- - Community Plan Future Land Use [ Residential Residential Emgmsis Mbsd Use _ Subutban Residatlal 0 Repional Commercial w4 Services O Community care rre.a� -;Community Commercial Milord Use Susinsss Park MbadUse E PEACH'STi Q Industrial Public Insiitubans r-3 Parks.Open Space and Recreational Lands Other Pubic LaWs Golf Course C7 Present Rural O 0 r• mu" OZ E MAN m7 -- - -- -- Design Review Board E 7o1ilL�1L�N S'f E .sPeN .rr E SPE\-ST Legend 8 Planning Pro(ects Saloom , City Limits(Ifilla) O Mixed use CO Ras4tmPBar CO'ITON 1000 ST Commercial Retai Sobs.Services.Banks _ - Hotemotel O CammardalAuto .Adn**traWewrdaaaional -•1.191%Manufacturing f OGoof Course Park or Cpan Space .t , Conservation F_asarnmt M Church ••, - /fy Public Faddty 1 SchoohEdu Wianat FadBty — yy (_]SiglrMousehold Raddontid OupleATripbx Rosideit l Q I.iAti.Household Residential Mobile HomeWobile Park Right-d-Way L]undevalePad E PEACIt ST QJ vacant Parcels ; RoedsAftp (� ; City UrAS -annin \ 9 Profs `ice I Bon+nwn{ Design Review Board LUMBER F__,a7__DTlS_TRIBUTOR lr s U STORIC TRAIN IDEPOT C,ra Pill NORTHERN PACIFIC COFFICES FORMERRAILWAY BREWERY SITEjF _t „ e fff & INDUSTRIAL S fT POCKET PARK E.ASPEN ST ARTISAN t BREAKFAST MFR. f `� ARTISAN SINGLE-FAMILY L MISCO . 4�. SINGLE-FAMILY - MFR. r RESIDENCES *: MILL 7 RESIDENCES I + �- • y �E.COTTONWOOD ST. SINGLE-FAMILY �� RESIDENCES k,uj CAFE L v MULTI-FAMB[Y cam, ;t� w + �, RESIDENTIAL ` 0 W ER&WINE f" Q•1,' .3 z 7 W- F,.. !? .#� 4 DISTRIBUTOR r t OFFICES& t BIKE I,Z,1 y OFFICES& r �~ STUDIOS SHOP BAKERY 11, STUDIOS E.PEACH ST. L44 TO KI 'd,� r ' DOWNTOWN i- SINGLE-FAMILY ` "� �%€;,' r .sy RESIDENCES ,e p NOR COMMERCIAL . 0 L.AkJPAi BUS DEPOT �^: .` `.�, ' �:�_ , • �. •7 0 BOZ E MAN MT Design Review Board 1 ra 1 1 �Oo�Mm'b�tw�i.aw, , 1 4 buildings -, 64 apartment , I � 1 units/29,700 sq. ft AAWV[ - f office over _ ; parking structure, ' I O=RL, LI --------- - ,u - ---� 96 parking �K I spaces 12 unit apartment <=•� =� " ; `• 1 ; "�°` building, artisan t� ; mixed use 'moo' I ` ���_ building 26 units over 5,400 sq. ft 2, 150 sq. ft restaurant building 72 parking spaces offsite, 32 on street BOZ E MAN MT Design Review Board m i - ; p ! ffTIT- I P 000 L ------------------------------- Ejl- EN LLJ TAC ❑ ❑ Li i v, f ti i - _ i ------------- - ---------------- ❑ ❑ �"'� �' ❑ ❑ ❑ i F-I= i o � I(1 BOZ E MAN MT Design Review Board Z- 7 TT j ll� ''i'1 l i BOZ E MAN MT Design Review Board RESIDENTIAL. COMMERCIAL ARTISAN MFR. COMMUNITY 8 .. 1 • i Design Review Board l i '� � .,..... go ur.unrw•eo naere.rrr rum ..r.•.�erw.na wc.�r.�msrrn u:�wv w•mew.iea. .w wnms wa nw .eimat uc.aw w.a.e o�m.. �u�ios p� `.00e.or �rrm-- go . __ — • a ID i fr�e+no•e• tt.ay nyr•,w•usreei r uu... .•sr.rp�w.aa..�xp.....w..�.- ..rn.or .ca+u*aovm...w •ow ��r pew an..� ooiws.*a .,r�ao1M c 7 ya h y r. .�_,y,r N0 oofia�000 �lartt_ftV•gon•wrtniwriw..oaw a � a m Design Review Board — ff 1 1 �y � _ g d r WOODS:(X,,* PANELSVN3 STAND:NGSEAM HORI20NTALAND CORRUGATED s. METAL ROOF SJG VERTLAL SUN METAL 5<:'�NG ANOSD.NG SHADES • G� � � it �� _ s 74 r AP IA RIB � �, "4 ��• - MT BOZEMAN ! Design Review Board I WWK. rmS amA anoi i' ♦UJAa AM AccessEl uno�oww Roo.oeva pf� .rasv�aiow`�.w� �L MIMfKI •Cw�tOVl>t Ems 1 wool so= aoo2 1 ('^ ty ,1 of 11 KALLKAK I WM MOiPrt Ti FUAMW Ado I` pA AYY. YLWI>MK tlKM�00 Wf I 1 I MT BOZEMAN Design Review Board o u)aa. e r�orur 'fir_ A- C� A I,IC j I.�L 11 ■L0� ■D6� n�am ten. w r i r -�; �� T Ti �..{ 1 a •� t i � j ry BOZ E MAN MT Bridger Vale Preliminary PUD Design Review Board 17232 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. E 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the • allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease 4 the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. i 4. BMC 38.320.-050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow i zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. S. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. ' 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10. BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11. BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. BOZEMAN MT Design Review Board Bridger Vale Preliminary PUD i i 17232 • Application meets criteria-Performance met through affordable housing, open space, LID • Recommendation is for conditional approval • No additional design conditions are recommended i Design Review Board sit 0 0 MT BOZ E MAN Design Review Board EWASMMM �. 4 buildings f L'. - _ - 64 apartment units/29,700 sq. ft 91 office over 0 h i - - F I parking structure, I � ---------- OFM ,ea, 06M �.. - :,U. 96 parking 1 spaces W� R 4tQ.P � lifAn�wO � . _ 12 unit apartment building, artisan v I u - ; mixed use ` building 26 units • — — as,s I -- 0� over 5,400 sq. ft 13 2, 150 sq. ftL! ; ;. restaurant r--I _ ��.� �� ► �;- - ,�� ,, ��' ; building I I -----------------------r----------------- ---- 72 parking spaces offsite, 32 on street 18516 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida (PUD) Preliminary Plan Date: Design Review Board, February 27, 2019, at 5:30 pm. Project Description: A Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) application to allow a mixed residential and commercial development with relaxations to zoning regulations requested for apartment building use, building height parking, street design, restaurant design, transparency, front setbacks and a request for concurrent construction. Project Location: 615 East Cottonwood Street and 720 North Ida Avenue. The parcels are legally described as Lots 5-16, Block 106 including a vacated alley and Lots 17-28, Block 105 including a vacated alley in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman located in S06, T02 S, R06 E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with conditions and code provisions Motion: "Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 18516 and move to recommend approval of the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions." Report Date: February 19, 2019 Staff Contact: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Executive Summary The property owner and applicant submitted an application to develop an existing underutilized site in the Northeast Historic Mixed Use District, NEHMU. The site is accessed from a future extension of East Aspen Street and from East Cottonwood Street. The development proposes a mix of uses including apartment buildings, an office building, a mixed use building including artisan manufacturing and a restaurant building. The proposal include four buildings. The largest building includes apartments, 64 units, and offices, 29,700 sq. ft., separated horizontally over an underground parking structure consisting of 96 parking spaces. The other buildings on site include a 12 unit apartment building, a mixed use building with artisan manufacturing, 5,400 sq. ft. with 26 units above and one 2,150 square foot commercial restaurant building. The application includes the concurrent construction of East Aspen Street, North Ida Avenue and the north half of East Cottonwood Street. The subject property is zoned Northeast Historic Mixed Use District. The site is 2.06 acres in size. The north half of the property includes four multi use storage and warehouse buildings constructed beginning in 1960. All buildings on the north half of 0 - 0 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 2 of 28 the property are proposed for demolition. The south half of the site includes a grain warehouse building constructed in 1930. The grain warehouse is proposed to remain and be adaptively reused through the site development process for use as a restaurant/community building. Eleven relaxations to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) zoning regulations are proposed with the application: 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. S. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10.BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11.BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. The criteria for granting a PUD are found in BMC 38.430.090. A PUD is a discretionary approval and the review authority must find that the overall development is superior to that offered by the basic existing zoning standards as required in BMC 38.20.030.A.4. The intent of a PUD is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in development proposals within the City.The applicants can request relaxations from the code in exchange for a higher quality of design.The obligation to show • 0 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 3 of 28 a superior outcome is the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant asserts that the overall outcome of the proposal is superior to what would be obtained from the application of the default NEHMU district. The Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the application. Based on its evaluation of the application against the criteria, the Development Review Committee (DRC) found the application adequate for continued review. The application is complete for design review purposes. The Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to review the application on February 27, 2019. The Design Review Board is the design review advisory body to the City Commission on this application. The DRB is required to make a recommendation to the City Commission on this application. Unresolved Issues There are no unresolved issues with the application. Code corrections have been provided by the DRC. Alternatives 1. Recommend Approval of the application with the recommended conditions and report findings; 2. Recommend Approval of the application with modifications to the recommended conditions and modifications to the report findings; 3. Recommend Denial the application based on the Design Review Board's findings of non- compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the review on the application with the concurrence of the applicant, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary.................................................................................................................................1 UnresolvedIssues.....................................................................................................................................3 Alternatives................................................................................................................................................3 SECTION1 - MAP SERIES............................................................................................................................5 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION / DEVIATIONS /VARIANCES................................ 14 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL..................................................... 14 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 4 of 28 SECTION 4— REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS................................................................................... 15 SECTION 5 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS............................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A—PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY.................................................26 APPENDIX B — OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF..........................................27 APPENDIX C —PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT...........................................................27 ATTACHMENTS...........................................................................................................................................28 0 • 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 5 of 28 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES In �. `' � � — � j���� �� ' I ''°� �� ► E Crl K ST � 1 ri jr lb r,l 1 1 � LJ �I' I fi _ i` 1� r .: L J . . IZNW: OD 1 out ,, six Liogend Planning Projects selection 0 F PEACH ST A �� Parcels Roads AIICys tit City Limits "�. ►' C /�` BPlanning Projects y AT ' Zoning Classification 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 6 of 28 E TA-N7ARACK S'I� I E ASPEN ST E ASPEN ST I I 'E CO•I.TONW0 D� T ! � Legend Planning Projects seledion Parcels Roads f` Alleys ity Limits l� iL ---' I 0 Planning.Projects -Community Plan future Land Use Residential Residential Emphasis Mixed Use i Suburban Residential C] Regional Commercial and Services C] Community Core %-J"f AL-1 Community Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Mixed Use T V EPEP ACH ST C7 Industrial t_ Public Institutions d Parks,Open Space and Recreational Lands 1y�7 © Other Public Lands �Q Goff Course Present Rural A� Growth policy designation 0 0 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 7 of 28 IN E TAMARACK S') i Tl 1' g jr -i--E ASPS EN ST i� 1,*, + el T II ? . - 3 - 04 '` ~ } a Legend Planning Projects selection ' City Limits(111118) ? F U Mixed Use —-- -- — 'r. i� RestauranllBar �_�r cn j:roiv�voc�v sT ❑Commercial Retail Sales,Sorvices,Banks HotellMotel O Commercial Auto V Ad ministrative%Profess Tonal Light Manu(acturing Golf Course d Park or Open Space i? Conservation Easement - Church Public Facility ®SchooAEducational Facir-ty Singl"ousehold Residential C i DupleATriplex Residential Multi-Household Residential Mobile HomeUNobile Ptak Lj Right-of-Way - Ci Undeveloped " r E PEACH ST f C7 vacant _ _'' --dWY. s s Paroels F Roads a Alleys Q i City Limms Q Planrgng Projects lip J Bozeman Current Land Use T , 1 �q I L IH d t Fwwmurea, T-- ' ;— MDMDAAVE"I — — — r---------r-- ------ — 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 9 of 28 SA a � , i n • I 1 f-WIE-1 J I _FH I I l >< a I R NO .y_,•S 1 � i , I it . , _'►_.== � �-�-���; �!'�-�'-�-�s-�#�_.�g-.es�.� .:mac�� +�, -' I -, 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 10 of 28 r—, L RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ARTISAN MFR. COMMUNITY •'t 5 7 z • 1 \ 46r 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 11 of 28 wxcio+.rw�ao .w nrw.e...wnwo- ,. i srnwneni, ns�...rwne.mr.. "P 1 •..c..a+,..samn Y.w.w - - -- -- .m`auv."wr a r� tI �ws, L.®a.. �����,�-m...x/.. ►�mx `.m.,aa ��RF,DCRWr•AS.[Y 'iR.GNAID.•!lO.MI .ore H,Y.T..,.V x•r M.aYY ��...lK aCxnPi.[f mi0@rtwlo .,.wtWYC.KOA.�,bi�R.rVf®swlm r .Yam M.,111LC xA..V.,u ram.uY ' -M[ lf 'MCI* TIM E 11 TI y! In] 11 .LL.DI.,. k RA➢... 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 12 of 28 .was .no. wno. �1 ,T 4�,t rii Cis+ ►1 5 HAUAW AIE AQ S1 r•- R ^i�1w¢ r �.OiMi .wi1VKt Ww n , L1A\'E • ��.�twf� rs ,oat.x.x us• �LrECEfinN.ow�rMM 7�iI may nao\ awae nm: o�.v n..r o.e,wv mwn , Iv roAl4LE Arc 4 PmAccC � ! I r ��33 i'A�E RCrPY:4�,lua,Jg_ _ • 18516 DRB Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development PUD Page 13 of 28 r—i sreus,. � _ TT4r i 1 '. �•-1 r c � � , i, � �� carrarmaoosr. _ _ I � ..m+ara wwreo., Q..noo, ..mrua.�, bs+a. yoao�• I_ ....,..� Ham" �, am. _ __ rn 11 T T' �)`�T�i������)�}; mom.�. •� ���pn� 1 ,tr.u.,. in n n I Q d4r $M SECT".KS aAPARTWRSOQ am' SLW4 i_-! H AWN SI � •0�tl10..� Wf1�MMlt' �: COT,0.ST Ht ,Ecnw_,cs."Mae r v.:♦ 0 • 17232 DRB Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Planned Unit Development(PUD) Page 14 of 28 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION/DEVIATIONS/VARIANCES 1. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests for to add apartment buildings as an allowable use in the NEHMU district. 2. BMC 38.310.040.0 Table of Uses. The application requests to increase the size of the allowable restaurant use in NEHMU from 1,500 to 2,200 square feet. 3. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to decrease the required front setback from 20 to 8 feet. 4. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to allow zero lot line conditions in the NEHMU. 5. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the allowable maximum height to be increased from 45' to 54'. 6. BMC 38.320.050 Form and Intensity Standards. The application proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage in NEHMU from 40% to 45%. 7. BMC 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required residential transparency from a minimum 15% to 8%. 8. BMC 38.510.030.13 Storefront Block Frontage. The application proposes to decrease the required commercial transparency from 60% to 30%. 9. BMC 38.540.050.A.1 Residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce the requirement for efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. The application proposes to reduce the requirements for one bedroom units from 1.5 spaces per unit to 1.25 spaces per unit. 10.BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Parking Standards. The application proposes to reduce all nonresidential parking standards by 40%. 11.BMC. 38.400.050.A.1 Street Design. The application proposes to not construct the street according to the adopted designs for local streets and instead construct East Cottonwood Street with back out angled parking. The relaxations may be granted with a Planned Unit Development (PUD).The criteria for granting PUD relaxations are included in BMC 38.430.030.A.4.c. Staff has reviewed the criteria and finds that they are met for all eleven relaxations with the adoption of the staff analysis and findings below for justification. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. • • 18516 DRB Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 15 of 28 SECTION 4 - REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS 1. All required code corrections are provided through the DRC review. SECTION 5 -STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Applicable Plan Review Criteria,Section 38.230.100,BMC. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not in any way create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. In considering applications for plan approval under this title,the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy Yes. The property has a future land use designation of Industrial and is zoned NEHMU, Northeast Historic Mixed Use. The proposed residential units, office and restaurant uses and artisan manufacturing uses increase the intensity of commercial uses and the density of residential uses beyond the existing development pattern. The change in intensity is anticipated by the growth policy in areas of the city with adequate infrastructure. The project is in conformance to and consistent with the City's adopted growth policy, the Bozeman Community Plan, including the following goals and objectives: Goal LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City,efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work,and minimizes sprawl. The NEHMU district has a distinct sense of place,this project contributes to an existing and expanding mixed use area and allows people to live in close proximity to work, public and private basic services and minimizes sprawl. Objective LU-1.4 Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design. This project provides additional density of residential and commercial use while respecting the context of the mixed use area.The change in scale is allowable with the 0 • 18516 DRB Staff Report for the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development Page 16 of 28 design presented as it has human scale and is compatible with the district with building sized within their context and integrated into the neighborhood. Objective LU-2.3: Encourage redevelopment and intensification, especially with mixed uses, of brownfields and underutilized property within the City consistent with the City's adopted standards. This project includes mixed uses and increase residential density and is proposed on underutilized property in an ongoing and developing mixed use district. Objective E-4.2: Promulgate efficient land use practices. This project promulgates efficient land use practices and provides a high net residential density and FAR with office, manufacturing and restaurant uses,while adding a significant amount of usable open space area that can be used by the entire community. Objective C-2.5 Explore and encourage innovative parking solutions for both residential and commercial projects including parking best practices,expanding parking districts, cash in lieu of parking and design guidelines for structured parking. This project proposes a parking reduction, structured parking integrated into the building design and offsite parking that will allow the project to provide an intensity of use today while having the ability to adapt to the changing transportation infrastructure in town including autonomous vehicles, ridesharing, car sharing, and increased transit service. Goal H-1: Promote an adequate supply of safe,quality housing that is diverse in type,density,cost,and location with an emphasis on maintaining neighborhood character and stability. This project provides additional quality housing at high density in an area that has historically included smaller residential low density uses. More recent infill projects in this neighborhood have included apartment uses over mixed commercial uses.This project will add to the neighborhood character and the stability of this area. Residential uses provide additional eyes on the street and have a twenty four hour presence that will make the district safer and enhance the overall neighborhood. For more information on the growth policy designation please see Appendix A. 2.Conformance to this chapter,including the cessation of any current violations Yes. The project, if approved,will conform to the Bozeman Municipal Code other than the requested relaxations. There are no known documented violations of the BMC for this property. 18516 DRB Staff Report foOe Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Alopment Page 17 of 28 3.Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances,and regulations Yes. The proposed uses of the site are consistent with the allowed uses of the NEHMU district with the additional of the apartment building use. No specific conflicts have been identified.Additional steps will be required including but not limited to final payment for cash in lieu of water rights, approval of the final planned unit development, subdivision exemption to realign and aggregate the underlying lots, dedication of the utility easements, construction of infrastructure, PUD final plan documents and application, site plan approval and building permits. The Building Division of the Department of Community Development will review the requirements of the International Building Code for compliance at the time of building permit application. Condition of approval 1 requires full compliance with all applicable code requirements. 4. Conformance with special review criteria for applicable permit type as specified in article 2 Yes. The CUP and PUD criteria are reviewed below.The project meets the requirements and criteria as presented. 5. Conformance with the zoning provisions of article 3, including permitted uses, form and intensity standards and requirements,applicable supplemental use criteria,and wireless facilities and/or affordable housing provisions if applicable Yes. The uses are permitted in the NEHMU district with the addition of apartment building uses requested through relaxation. Form and intensity standards are met with the proposal other than the proposed relaxations for the front setback and zero lot line conditions, lot coverage and building heights.Affordable housing is proposed in compliance with the PUD performance standards and will be confirmed through the final PUD process. 6. Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4, including transportation facilities and access,community design and element provisions, and park and recreational requirements Yes. The proposed streets meet standards with the proposed relaxations. East Aspen Street, East Cottonwood Street and North Ida Avenue are required to be improved with this project. The proposed parking is to be met with reductions allowed through relaxation of the parking requirements. Pedestrian access is provided from the street directly through and into the project. The primary entrances into each building are connected to the City's sidewalk system. Perimeter street frontage sidewalks are provided on every perimeter street in conformance to standards. The lots and block meet standards,water and sewer is provided to each lot through mains within the city owned rights of way. The applicant will be constructing water mains to support the site. Site surface drainage generally meets standards at this level in the design for the streets 18516 DRB Staff Report fo*e Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Selopment Page 18 of 28 and development. Cash in lieu of water rights is proposed and will be paid with the final site plan for site development. The applicant proposes to pay cash in lieu of parkland in conformance with standards, capped at twelve dwelling units per acre. 7.Conformance with the project design provisions of article 5, including compatibility with,and sensitivity to,the immediate environment of the site and adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development; design and arrangement of the elements of the plan; landscaping; open space; lighting, signage; The development is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to, building mass and height, landscaping, orientation of parking and building placement on the site. The buildings comply with permanence in building materials, building quality, architectural integration, neighborhood identity, and orientation of parking and service areas. The general approach to landscaping meets standards. The design of the plan is consistent with the existing natural topography. The site will be raised to allow the inclusion of underground parking.There are no water bodies or significant existing vegetation on site. A general comprehensive signage is proposed in conformance with standards. Parking is proposed to be reduced via a relaxation for both residential and commercial uses. 96 parking spaces are proposed in an underground parking structure and 72 parking spaces are proposed offsite for the non residential uses. 32 on street spaces are proposed for residential use. Prior to reductions the project would have required 255.3 parking spaces,with reductions the required parking is proposed at 166.1 parking spaces. 200 parking spaces are proposed to be provided through a combination of onsite, offsite and on street as outlined above. 8. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives set forth in articles 4-6, including the enhancement of the natural environment, watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats; and if the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area,have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area Yes. Pervious pavers are proposed to treat stormwater from the development. This is in compliance with best practices for Low Impact Development.The approach to the stormwater system meets code standards.The final review of the stormwater system will occur with the site plan review. The development is adjacent to a small public park 18516 DRB Staff Report folle Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Melopment Page 19 of 28 and climbing boulder. No significant impact to the park is anticipated from this development. 9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of article 4 and article 6 Yes. No streams, floodplains, critical plant communities or wetlands exist on site. 10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties No public comment has been received to date. Public comment will commence once the project can be scheduled for a public hearing. 11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b.The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming The property must be configured through the applicable subdivision review process to relocate and aggregate common lot boundaries prior to the approval of the final PUD plan. 12. Phasing of development Not applicable. The project is proposed to be constructed in one phase. Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria,Section 38.230.110, BMC, E. In addition to the review criteria of section 38.230.100,the review authority shall, in approving a conditional use permit, determine favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity; The site is adequate.The proposed buildings, site design, pedestrian connectivity, open space and mix of uses will enhance the neighborhood. Landscaped areas are coordinated with adjoining properties and within the proposed development.The landscape design will improve the street frontages of the site.The reduced setbacks proposed through relaxation relate well to the historic building placements within the 18516 DRB Staff Report fooe Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Melopment Page 20 of 28 vicinity.All parking is proposed either in an underground structure or offsite which provides for an uninterrupted streetscape for pedestrians and the addition of on street parking. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof; No adverse impacts to abutting properties have been identified. The construction of East Aspen Street and the reconstruction and completion of North Ida Avenue and East Cottonwood Street will improve safety for vehicles, cyclists,and pedestrians which promotes public health and safety. General welfare will be promoted through a variety of apartment types which will provide a variety of housing options for area residents. The provision of additional office, manufacturing and restaurant uses to the districts promotes general welfare by providing an expansion and additional density to the mixed of uses in the NEHMU.The development serviced by the existing municipal sanitary sewer and water systems promotes public health by protecting groundwater from degradation associated with on-site septic systems and domestic wells. Stormwater will be managed in pervious pavers and other retention facilities to filter out sediment and treat runoff. . 3.That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare.Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use; b.Special yards, spaces and buffers; c.Special fences,solid fences and walls; d. Surfacing of parking areas; e. Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g. Regulation of signs; h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise,vibrations and odors; j. Regulation of hours for certain activities; k.Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; 1. Duration of use; 18516 DRB Staff Report fooe Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Oelopment Page 21 of 28 m. Requiring the dedication of access rights; and n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner. The requirements of DRC review and the proposed covenants, maintenance plans and design guidelines associated with the project will address these areas. F. In addition to all other conditions,the following general requirements apply to every conditional use permit granted: 1.That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure; and 2.That all of the conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the county clerk and recorder's office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits,final plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. The necessary recording of documents will be addressed as part of the final PUD plan process. Planned Unit Development Review Criteria,Section 38.430.090.& BMC. The application presents the applicant's response to these criteria. 2. In addition to the criteria for all site plan and conditional use reviews, the following criteria will be used in evaluating all planned unit development applications. a.All development.All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against,and comply with,the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory"all development"group. (1) Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigation companies,fire protection, electricity,flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Yes, except for those standards proposed for relaxation the application conforms and in some areas exceeds standards. 18516 DRB Staff Report forte Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Allopment Page 22 of 28 (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Yes. The site has been substantially disturbed by development and previous land uses and does not include significant natural vegetation. There will be substantial placement of new vegetation within the site open spaces and perimeter street frontage. (3)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient,functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes. The proposal is cohesive and has a variety of coordinating elements ranging from efficient circulation, underground structured parking, integrated architecture between buildings, presentations of building fronts to the streets, private residential open spaces, open spaces available to the public,and multiple landscape configurations. (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks;selection and placement of landscape materials,and/or use of renewable energy sources;etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Yes. The project proposes to construct to a LEED ND designation. LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND),where "LEED" stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a United States-based rating system that integrates the principles of smart growth, urbanism and green building into a national system for neighborhood design. LEED certification provides independent,third-party verification that a development's location and design meet accepted high levels of environmentally responsible, sustainable development. The LEED-ND system is a collaboration between the United States Green Building Council,the Congress for the New Urbanism and the Natural Resources Defense Council. (5)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Yes.The project is design to allow a diversity of residential types and configurations, many ground floor units have access to outdoor spaces for their own use which provide a public private separation for their units.Along the perimeter streets the residential units along the frontages are raised up above the sidewalk level to a varying degree to provide a transitional space between the public street and the private units.The development complies with the interior special residential block frontage for all units. Landscaping is provided along the streetscape and within the development that will provide additional privacy.All vehicular access to the site is via the underground parking structure that will generally only be used by the residents, city services and their private service providers. 18516 DRB Staff Report fo$e Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Alopment Page 23 of 28 (6)Park land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by section 38.420.020? Yes. Parkland is provided per code requirements via cash in lieu of dedication. Open space is provided for each residential building in compliance with standards. (7) Performance.All PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points. Yes.With a PUD, Section 38.430.090.E.2.a.7 requires at least 20 performance points for the subject property. There are 11 options provided in the UDC to meet this requirement. Points can be met using any combination of on-site and off-site open space or other options listed in the code.The Preliminary PUD must specify how the performance points are being met. Open space provisions for phased PUD developments: If a project is to be built in phases, each phase shall include an appropriate share of the proposed recreational, open space, affordable housing and other site and building amenities of the entire development used to meet the requirements of section 38.430.090.E.2.The appropriate share of the amenities for each phase shall be determined for each specific project at the time of preliminary approval and shall not be based solely upon a proportional or equal share for the entire site. The PUD is proposing to satisfy the performance requirements with credits for affordable housing (21), additional open space (9.37), underutilized and Brownfield sites (6.67), LEED-ND (15) and low impact development plan (6). The tabulation is under the common open space section of the application narrative on page 25. The application satisfies the requirement with 58 performance points. The development exceeds standards. (8) Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad"to adjoining development? Yes the project will create new connections to the neighborhood around it with the construction of additional streets sidewalks and open spaces. c. Mixed Use. Planned unit developments in mixed-use areas (REMU, UMU, and NEHMU zoning districts) may include commercial, light industrial, residential and mixes of various primary and accessory uses.The particular types or combination of uses are determined based upon its merits,benefits,potential impact upon adjacent land uses and the intensity of development. 18516 DRB Staff Report fo a Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Alopment Page 24 of 28 (1)Is the project substantially consistent with the intent and purpose statements for the underlying zoning district? Yes.This neighborhood includes commercial uses, offices, manufacturing and housing. The intent of the northeast historic mixed-use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses.This PUD provides a creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses. This PUD proposes appropriate use of the land with a broad range of nonresidential and residential uses. (2)Is the project located adjacent or within proximity to an arterial or collector street that provides adequate access to the site? Yes. The project is located 300 feet from Peach Street, a collector street and 300 feet from Tamarack Street a collector street with both streets feeding into Rouse Avenue to the west the closest arterial street to the project. (3) Is the project on at least two acres of land? Yes, the site is 2.01 acres of land. (4) Do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD,pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities,streetscape, etc.? Yes,the overall site layout and design guidelines provide a comprehensive design that coordinates pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design and the utilization of open space and facilities. (5) Does the overall project achieve or exceed the FAR 'floor area ratios"envisioned for the underlying district? Yes. There is no designated FAR required in the NEHMU.The proposed total FAR of the development is 1.8 with 46 dwelling units to the acre. (6)Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? Yes. This development will contribute to the mixed use character in this area and the eclectic residential and nonresidential uses located in this neighborhood. 18516 DRB Staff Report forlJfe Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Alopment Page 25 of 28 (7)Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas which contain more than ten spaces? Yes.All parking spaces are accesses through the underground parking structure.The offsite parking proposed at the northwest corner of Wallace Avenue and East Aspen Street is within the distance requirements for off-site parking.. (8) Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the city growth policy? Yes.This project is an infill project on an underutilized site. (9) Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas(such as urban plazas, courtyards, landscaped areas, open spaces, or urban trails)for the use and enjoyment of those living in, working in or visiting the development? Yes. Private residential and publicly accessible open space are proposed for those living, working in or visiting the development. (10) Does the project provide for private outdoor areas(e.g.,private setbacks,patios and/or balconies, etc.)for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light, sun, ventilation,privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Yes. Outdoor balconies and patios are proposed for many of the individual dwelling units. Shared green roof deck opens space is provided for the apartment residents in Buildings 1-2. Commercial open space is provided for the office use. (11) Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? Yes. Private and publicly accessible open space are proposed. The project is very close to the mountains to main street trail system. (12) Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and provide efficient public services and facilities? Yes. Enhancements to this underutilized site and connection to city services will allow a high density residential development in close proximity to services, transit, recreation and employment opportunities.The project is being designed as a LEED-ND neighborhood. (13) If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and urban styles designed to address community-wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? Yes,Affordable housing a variety of housing types and urban styles are proposed. 18516 DRB Staff Report foGe Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit tolopment Page 26 of 28 (14) Residential density bonus. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus(30 percent maximum) above the residential density of the zoning district or building type within which the project is located and which is set forth in division 38.310 of this chapter, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards(such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development?The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus is determined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation must be provided within the project. Those dwellings subject to division 38.380 must be excluded from the base density upon which the density bonus is calculated. Not applicable. No formal density bonus is proposed. APPENDIX A -PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The property is zoned NEHMU, Northeast Historic Mixed Use The intent of the northeast historic mixed-use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses.Standards for buffering between different land uses are deliberately not as high as standards elsewhere in the community as it is assumed that persons choosing to locate in this area are aware of the variety of possible adjacent land uses and have accepted such possibilities as both acceptable and desirable. It is expected that the lots within this district will continue to develop under a variety of uses which may increase or decrease in scope in any given portion of the district. The clear intent of this district is to support a mix and variety of non-residential and residential uses. Nothing in division 38.300 of this article shall be interpreted to be discouraging or prejudicial to any listed use except as set forth as principal and conditional uses. Adopted Growth Policy Desi nq ation: The property is designated as Industrial in the Bozeman Community Plan. This classification provides areas for the uses which support an urban environment such as manufacturing, warehousing, and transportation hubs. Development within these areas is intensive and is connected to significant transportation corridors. In order to protect the economic base and necessary services represented by industrial uses, uses which would be detrimentally impacted by industrial activities are discouraged. Although use in these areas is intensive, these areas are part of the larger community and shall meet basic standards for landscaping and other site design issues and 18516 DRB Staff Report fort Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit De9opment Page 27 of 28 be integrated with the larger community. In some circumstances, uses other than those typically considered industrial have been historically present in areas which were given an industrial designation in this growth policy. Careful consideration must be given to public policies to allow these mixed uses to coexist in harmony. APPENDIX B- OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Bangtail Partners LLC 1189 Tennessee Street, Unit 103, San Francisco, CA 94107 Applicant: Imperial Development LLC 33 North Black Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representatives:Thinktank Design Group Inc.33 North Black Avenue, Bozeman,MT 59715 Report By: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager APPENDIX C-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 38.430.010. Intent. A. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development (PUD) concept, to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and general welfare, it shall be the intent of this chapter to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: 1. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with the city's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies; 2. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the city area; 3. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities; 4. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks; S. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage, water quality and reduction of flood damage; 6. To encourage patterns of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation,thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; 7. To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation; 8. To reduce energy consumption and demand; 9. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography; 18516 DRB a 28 of 28 Sta Re ort or Uie Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit De4�lo ment Pa ff p f p g 10.To improve the design, quality and character of new development; 11.To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas; 12.To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of incompatible developments; 13.To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer, the neighborhood and the community as a whole; 14.To promote the efficient use of land resources, full use of urban services, mixed uses, transportation options, and detailed and human-scale design; and 15.To meet the purposes established in section 38.01.040. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. .0 • Design Review Board Wednesday, February 27th, 2019 at 5:30 pm City Hall, Commission Room 121 N. Rouse Ave. A. Call meeting to order and Roll Call B. Changes to the Agenda C. Minutes • 2.13.19 Minutes (PDF) • 2.13.19 Video D. Public Comment Please state your name and address in an audible tone of voice for the record. This is the time for individuals to comment on matters falling within the purview of the Committee. There will also be an opportunity in conjunction with each action item for comments pertaining to that item. Please limit your comments to three minutes. E. Action Items 1. 18516 Cottonwood&Ida PUDP (Krueger) A Preliminary Planned Unit Development(PUD) application to allow a mixed residential and commercial development with relaxations to zoning regulations requested for apartment building use, building height parking,street design, restaurant design, transparency,front setbacks and a request for concurrent construction. • 18516 Staff Report • 18516 Application Materials • 18516 Plans 2. Election of Design Review Board Officers F. FYI/Discussion 1. Future Agenda Items G. Adjournment For more information please contact Brian Krueger at bkrueaer@bozeman.net This board generally meets the second and fourth Wednesday of the month at 5:30pm Committee meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and require assistance, please contact our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray at 406-582-3232 (TDD 582-2301). BOZ E MAN MT Engineering Division MEMORANDUM -------------------------7---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: BRIAN KRUEGER, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MANAGER FROM: GRIFFIN NIELSEN, ENGINEER I RE: COTTONWOOD AND IDA PRELIMINARY PUD REVIEW APPLICATION No. 18516 DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2018 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENGINEERING COMMENTS: 1. Bozeman Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 38.400.010.A. states: All streets must comply with the adopted growth policy and/or transportation plan. The arrangement, type, extent, width,grade and location of all streets must be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographical conditions, to public convenience and safety, and to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such streets. The design standards contained in these regulations apply to all construction, reconstruction and paving of streets. Review authority for exceptions or modifications to this section is specified in division 38.220. a. The traffic impact study must provide according to UDC section 38.220.060.A.12. and 38.400.060., the following updates are required prior to preliminary PUD approval: i. The report must be stamped by a professional engineering registered in the state of Montana. ii. The report should include the existing and projects traffic counts on North Wallace Ave within the study. iii. The study must include the 15 year projection for the intersection of the City's arterial and collector streets within the study area. 2. UDC Section 38.400.050.A.1 states: All streets and roads providing access to, and within, the proposed development shall meet the following standards: 1. Right-of-way width and construction standards contained in this chapter, the most recently adopted long range transportation plan, the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy, and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications shall apply. a. The back out angled parking proposed along East Cottonwood is non-standard and must be requested with the PUD. The property owner's association will be required to maintain the proposed parking including snow plowing and maintenance of the parking surfaces. The property Bozeman, 1 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZ E MAN A Engineering Division owner's association documents must include language to this effect and be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval b. City standard delineators must be installed at the ends of the parking stall islands along East Cottonwood. c. The proposed drive access bulb-out on East Aspen Street is non-standard and must be removed. 3. UDC Section 38.400.010.A.8.: Second or emergency access. To facilitate traffic movement, the provision of emergency services and the placement of utility easements, all developments must be provided with a second means of access. If, in the judgment of the development review committee (DRC), a second dedicated right-of-way cannot be provided for reasons of topography or other physical conditions, the developer must provide an emergency access, built to the standards detailed in these regulations. a. The applicant must provide emergency service vehicle turning diagrams to ensure that emergency service vehicles can reasonable access the site prior to preliminary PUD approval and clarify the following: i. Sheet AS.302 shows an encroachment from the Misco Mill on to the property line and emergency vehicle access road, this is inconsistent with the plan view sheets provided.The applicant must verify that the Misco Mill does not encroach into the emergency vehicle access road at any point. ii. Sheet AS.101 shows an encroachment from the Building 5 on to the emergency vehicle access road. 4. UDC Section 38.400.090.D.2 states: These standards apply to the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and intersections, and the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and other public and/or private accesses. a. The proposed drive accesses on to East Aspen Street do not meet the access do not meet the City's access separation requirements. The site must separation requirements or receive a deviation prior to preliminary PUD approval. b. The proposed emergency vehicle access is with the 20 foot required separation from the adjacent property to the west. 5. UDC Section 38.400.100.0 states: Drive aisles and alleys. At the intersection of each driveway or alley with a street, no fence, wall or planting in excess of 30 inches above the street centerline grade is permitted within a triangular area where corners are defined by two points on the right-of-way line, 15 feet on each side of the centerline of the driveway or alley and a point on centerline ten feet outside the right-of-way. Any driveway or alley wider than 30 feet curb to curb at the right- of-way line must use the vision triangle standard for local streets when intersecting local, collector, or arterial streets. a. Street vision triangles must be shown on the landscaping plans. The vision triangle may not be impeded by landscaping including boulevard trees. The Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZ E MAN MT Engineering Division proposed tree shown on the landscaping plan appear to impeded the vision triangle b. The street vision triangle for the emergency vehicle access on East Aspen street, shown on sheet C1.00, is impeded by the building to the west. c. The street vision triangle for the access to the underground parking area is incorrectly shown on sheet C 1.00. 6. UDC Section 38.410.060.A states: Where determined to be necessary, public and/or private easements shall be provided for private and public utilities, drainage, vehicular or pedestrian access, etc. a. The applicant must provide an overall plan clearly denoting the locations of the existing and proposed right-of-way, property lines, and easements prior to preliminary PUD approval. b. An amended plat must be completed prior to final PUD approval for any change in lot lines. c. Public utility easements are required along each street the property fronts on as per UDC Section 38.410.060.B.2.a. No encroachment may be permitted with the approval from all utility companies. d. The applicant must provide a public access easements for required public sidewalks located outside of the public right-of-way. 7. UDC 38.410.070.A.1 states: The developer must install complete municipal water and sanitary sewer system facilities, or a system allowed by section 38.350.030.D, and may be required by the city to install municipal storm sewer system facilities. These systems must be installed in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city, and must conform with any applicable facilities plan. The city's requirements are contained in the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications, and by this reference these standards are incorporated into and made a part of these regulations. The developer must submit plans and specifications for the proposed facilities to the city and to the state department of environmental quality and must obtain their approvals prior to commencing construction of any municipal water, sanitary sewer or storm sewer system facilities. a. Per City of Bozeman Design Standards and specifications Policy Manual Section V.D.2.c water main are required to perpendicularly cross sanitary sewer mains. b. The water and sewer design report must be stamped by a professional engineer register in the state of Montana and include the following additional information prior to final PUD approval: i. The residual pressures and velocity with in the surrounding distribution system while the fire flow plus max hour demand is provided for the development. 8. UDC Section 38.410.080.A. states: The developer must install complete drainage facilities in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city, and must conform to any applicable facilities plan and the terms Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZ E MAN MT 0 • Engineering Dd' i* Wapproved site specific stormwater control plan. The city's requirements are contained in the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications, and by this reference these standards are incorporated into and made a part of these regulations. The developer must submit plans and specifications to the city and to the state department of environmental quality (if applicable), and must obtain their approvals prior to commencing construction of any drainage system facilities. a. The applicant must submit a stormwater drainage report, certified by a professional engineering within the state of Montana, for the onsite and public right-of-way drainage and have the reports reviewed and approved prior to preliminary PUD approval. b. The geotechnical report notes the presents of groundwater at approximate depth of 7-8 feet with the possibility this elevation increasing. In addition the reports note this is of significant concern for the proposed subsurface parking area and provides a number of design recommendations. The application is unclear as to if any of the recommendation will be implemented. As a number of the recommendation may affect areas outside of the project the applicant must provide details of how the groundwater will be addressed on site with the engineer certified drainage report prior to preliminary PUD approval. The applicant is advised that the City do not permit sump pumps to discharge into the City infrastructure. c. The drainage infrastructure proposed on East Aspen is non-standard and should be located onsite within a public drainage easement. The proposed location may only be approved as a PUD relaxation and will require an encroachment permit. The system will must be maintained by the property owner's association. d. The applicant must submit a stormwater maintenance plan for the proposed onsite stormwater system prior to preliminary PUD approval. The approved maintenance plan be included within the property owner's associate document prior to final PUD approval. e. The minimum City's stormwater main is 15" and must be located a minimum of 5 feet from a sanitary sewer main, this must be addressed prior to preliminary PUD approval. f. The applicant must demonstrate that the existing stormwater system in Wallace Aveune has sufficient capacity to accept the flow from the new main in East Aspen, prior to final PUD approval. 9. UDC Section 38.410.130.A states: Prior to a final approval of all development reviewed as a site plan, conditional use permit, planned unit development, or subdivision and prior to an annexation of any land,one of the following must occur: Payment must be made to the city of a payment-in-lieu of water rights, calculated based on the annual demand for volume of water the development will require multiplied by the most current annual unit price; a. The applicant must pay cash-in-lieu of water rights prior to final PUD approval. P.O. Box 1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. IW r BOZ E MAN Engineering Division 10. UDC Section 38.430.070.A..: Applications for phased planned unit developments. If a planned unit development is intended to be developed over time in two or more separate phases, application for approval of a phased planned unit development must follow procedures established for pre-application review as outlined in this division 38.430. After pre-application review is completed, phased PUDs may be proposed in accordance with one of the following procedures: a. The proposed phasing plan does not provide sufficient information to determine is the each phase meets UDC. The applicant must clarify when the onsite infrastructure will be constructed including stormwater, trash/recycling facilities, pedestrian access, emergency service access, etc. The applicant should reference advisory comment No. 1 11. If not already filed for the subject site, the applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Street improvements to North Wallace Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage b. Street improvements to East Tamarack Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage c. Street improvements to East Peach Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage d. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage e. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Tamarack Street f. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Peach Street The document filed must.specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID,waiver prior to final PUD approval. CONDITION(S) OF APPROVAL: 12. The intersection of East Aspen Street and the Front Street and Ida Street and Front Street must be reconfigured to meet the City's intersection standards. The intersection must be improved with the first phase of development. Any changes to the City Park at the intersection will require the approval from the Parks Department prior to final PUD approval. Bozeman, NIT 59771-1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZEMANM Engineering Division ADVISORY COMMENTS: 1. Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions, streets, and storm water improvements, prepared and signed by a professional engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Water and sewer plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The applicant shall also provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications' have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. Building permits will not be issued prior to City acceptance of the infrastructure improvements unless all provisions set forth in Section 38.270.030.0 of the Bozeman Municipal Code are met to allow for concurrent construction. P.O. Box 1230 O 1 East Olive Street ® Bozeman, • 1 O 416 : :1 O 416 : • bo TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZ E MAN MT Community Development FROM: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: COTTONWOOD AND IDA PRELIMINARY PUD,APPLICATION 18516 DATE: NOVEMBER 28,2018 Section 1—PROJECT GENERAL Project Description: Preliminary Planned Unit Development(PPUD)application for a multi building mixed use development at 615 E. Cottonwood/702 N. Ida. Recommendation:Staff has found that the project does not comply with the requirements of Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code and is deeming the application inadequate for further review. Clarifications must be provided and code corrections must be satisfied prior to continued review and a recommendation for approval. All references are to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC), primarily Chapter 38. Section 2-RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. These conditions are specific to the development. 1. None at this time.Additional information is required prior to adequacy and continued review. PLANNING COMMENTS Planning Division, Brian Krueger,bkrueeer@bozeman.net.406-582-2259 Section 3—REQUIRED CODE CORRECTIONS All references are to the Bozeman Municipal Code. Planning Division, Brian Krueger, bkrueger@bozeman.net, 582-2259 1. BMC 38.220.010.Update form Al project information.Update block frontage to frontage designated on the Community Development Block Frontage Map. The map shows all frontages as mixed block frontage. Many internal pathways include residential units that face the pathways those areas are subject to the special residential block frontage standards. All block frontages must additionally be noted on the site plan. 2. BMC 38.220.010. Update form Al number 5. To provide the title and position of the individuals signing on behalf of the LLC's. The new Al submitted does not show the title and position of individuals who have signed the application form. 3. BMC 38.220.010 38.220.080 At a minimum one site plan exhibit must have the majority of the required data and detailing and annotations required by the SP1 form. No one exhibit shows the required information. O 1 East Otive Street © Box 1230 O 41. .1 Q 41. Bozeman, 1 T 11 IY An/ 1 AA /tan, T1 i t hA^C T 1 1%1 An 1 r MI n rr Page 2 of 7 BOZ E MAN MT Community Development 4. BMC 38.220.010 and 38.220.080. The other specific site plan sheets that demonstrate specific elements of the plan must have the relevant data related to what is being shown. For example the parking sheet AS.105 does not include site vision triangles which are relevant to on street parking allowances. The parking sheet is not annotated with parking dimensions for spaces nor does it provide the angle of the on-street parking proposed on East Cottonwood. Another example, the open space plan does not provide dimensions for all open space areas,does not clearly allocate open space per building, does not show a proposed easement area to allow public access and clearly differentiate between onsite residential open space, usable commercial open space and PUD open space for points purposes.All detailed plans must be updated to provide the relevant information. 5. BMC 38.220.010 the Plans and Specifications (Form PLS) requirements are not met throughout the application materials and plans. Annotations and measured dimensions are not thorough and are not provided consistently on plans per requirements, Cover sheet data not provided as required: no parking calculations, area schedules, dwelling unit types, FAR, net residential density open space calculations, parkland calculations, etc. and other required site data are provided on coversheet, a parkland tracking table is not provided, etc. Site plan index sheet must include date of preparation of all sheets to control versioning through the review per PLS. 6. BMC 38.220.010 Digital files of PUD documents not separated as required in PLS form. Name each document separately per digital naming protocol in PLS document. 7. BMC 38.220.010 update coversheet of the PUD document to reflect the current owners of the property, Bangtai) Partners, LLC per the title report.The coversheet submitted shows the owners as Imperial Development, LLC, not the owner of the property per the title report. 8. BMC 38.220.050 Weed control plan not approved by Weed Control District as required. 9. BMC 38.220.300 and 38.220.080 Supplementary Documents. The proposed ownership of the development is a condominium, as such per requirements draft supplementary documents must be submitted with the preliminary plan. Provide draft documents as required for 38.220.310 and 38.220.320 10. BMC 38.220.010 Utilities and utility rights of way and proposed utility easements for gas, electric and communications not provided per code and SP1. 11. BMC 38.220.080.A.2.g requires PUD plans to provide detailed topography, transportation, street, traffic and utility information to a distance of 200 feet from the exterior perimeter of a PUD site.This information is not provided. 12. BMC 38.220.080 Phased site plan information is incomplete. See sub.A.2.q. 13. BMC 38.220.080 provide information of any proposed separate building occupancy phasing and how the required parking and open space will be provided in concurrent amounts for all buildings proposed for phasing. 14. BMC 38.220.080 Irrigation water. Clarify proposed water demand for irrigation system. Clarify the nature of the existing well and water right to support the new demand. 15. BMC 38.220.120.A.2.a(4).The phasing plan indicates PUD concurrent construction of buildings and on and offsite infrastructure is desired. Clarify if PUD concurrent construction is proposed. If so provide the request along with a concurrent construction plan and respond to the criteria and provide all information for the requirements of PUD concurrent construction in BMC 38.270.030.D. O 1 East Olive Street © P.O. Box 1230 O 416 : •1 O 416 : • // / Bozeman, • 1 rnn. AAA_snQ_')ani T4.IC AAnrT I I\/ARI C DI Ar-C Page 3 of 7 BOZ E MAN MT Community Development 16. BMC 38.320.050.0 Table of Form and Intensity Standards Minimum setbacks required for the NEHMU district. The project does not meet setback requirements with the underlying lot configurations. The lots must be aggregated or otherwise configured through the applicable subdivision exemption review process in order to meet requirements. The final signed mylars have been provided to our office to satisfy this code requirement. The amended plat must be filed prior to final PUD approval. 17. BMC 38.320.050.0 Table of Form and Intensity Standards Minimum setbacks required for the NEHMU district. The proposed lot configuration includes a zero lot line configuration between proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3.The code does not authorize the use of a zero lot line configuration in the form and intensity standards for NEHMU.A relaxation must be requested to allow this condition. 18. BMC 38.400.010.A.8 Second or emergency access. Clarify the right of way proposed for secondary emergency access. Is the proposed a dedicated right of way to city, access easement, public access easement, or other? Provide dimensions and total extent of proposed secondary and emergency access areas noted as fire lane on plan sets. 19. BMC 38.400.090.C.3.c Drive accesses for multiple tenant commercial building or complexes/centers, or industrial drive accesses must be set back a minimum of 20 feet from adjacent properties unless such drive access is approved as a shared drive access. Clarify access shown as fire lane and how it complies with standards. No shared access to properties to the west is proposed. 20. BMC 38.400.100 and 38.220.080 Street vision triangles not shown on plans. Clarify locations and compliance with standards for all street intersections and drive way intersections take into account all retaining walls, landscape berms and clarify site vision at structured parking entrance. 21. BMC 38.410.060.13 and 38.220.080 Private utility easements not shown or proposed. 22. BMC 38.410.060.8.3 No private utility plan provided as required with preliminary plan when concurrent construction is proposed. 23. BMC 38.410.060.B.4 Encroachments proposed in required ten foot private utility easement areas required along all streets. No written approval from all utility companies is provided as required.The current and entire list of utility companies operating in Montana can be attained from the Montana Public Service Commission. Clarify and update C1.00 and A51.01 as they show encroachments differently. 24. BMC 38.410.120 Mail Delivery. Clarify location of mail delivery area on site plan, proposed detail submitted too general to analyze any impacts to pedestrian circulation, utility easements and services. Provide footprint and size dimensions of cluster box and required pad,proposed access and other details to clarify. 25. BMC 38.430.020. A planned unit development may not be applied to development that does not have one or more principal uses or structures on contiguous parcels. No entitlement or relaxations may be granted for the offsite parking lot through this application process. 26. BMC 38.430.030.A.4.b Relaxations (deviations) Item 1 applicant must clarify specific code section and requested relaxation from code standard. The application must also request a deviation for apartment building use. 27. BMC 38.430.030..A.4.b Relaxations (deviations) Item 2 separate relaxation from front setback in form and intensity table and requested modifications to block frontage standards.Clarify relaxations requested. Each code section to be modified must be identified specifically. O 1 © P.O. :� 1 O 416 : •1 © 416 : • b• Bozeman, • 1 Mr). n01_1Zao_9101 TLJC AAr1CT I MART C DI Arc Page 4 of 7 BOZ E MAN MT Community Development 28. BMC 38.430.030.A.4.b Relaxations(deviations) Item 3 We recommend that instead of modifying the side setback as requested that the relaxation state that zero lot line conditions are allowed as per the other zones identified in BMC 38.320.050.0 Table of Form and Intensity Standards. Add allowance for zero lot line to minimum setbacks required for the NEHMU district. 29. BMC 38.430.030.A.4.b Relaxations(deviations) Item 5. Clarify last statement in that section that the application requests a relaxation of 20%to all nonresidential parking requirements consistent with code language. Eliminate reference to commercial parking. 30. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(a) PUD performance. Not eligible for affordable housing performance points as the proposed units do not meet the definition of affordable housing in 38.700.020. PUD affordable housing is defined separately from the requirements of BMC 38.380. 31. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(b) PUD performance. Not eligible for this performance unless a specific public access easement is proposed and the area is defined. Provide clarifications. 32. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(d) PUD performance. This site is eligible to claim credit for brownfield and underutilized sites with the appropriate calculations provided. 33. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(e) PUD performance. Not eligible for the designed to meet LEED-ND performance points as the project is not conditionally approved nor does it have precertification per requirements. 34. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(i) PUD performance. Not eligible,the recycling transfer station referenced in the code is a community level transfer station similar in size and scale to those provided by the Gallatin Solid Waste Management District and not recycling collection for site residents and guests. 35. BMC 38.520.060.E On-site residential open space. Provide clarification of proposed residential open space by building. Clarify which open space credit and allotment per building. Provide calculation and percentage of common space that applies to each building. Provide dimensions on the plans for all open space areas per SP1 and PLS documents.Clearly separate onsite residential open space and required PUD performance open space and usable commercial open space in calculations and exhibits and provide code references to clearly differentiate the required spaces. Show how the proposed public access will be achieved. 36. BMC 38.520.060.0 No usable commercial open space designated or provided as required. 37. BMC 38.520.070 Location and design of service areas. No service areas identified for gas and electric entrance locations into the buildings or proposed methods to separate and mitigate impacts as required. Show gas and electric locations as required per SP1 on entire site and general proposed locations for private utility entrance locations into the buildings. 38. BMC 38.520.070.E Location and design of service areas. Service areas for trash service are not approved by the Sanitation Division.Service areas for Building 1 and Building 4 do not include ramps or a safe and accessible locations for trash dumpster pick up. Clarify individuals responsible for moving the trash dumpsters to pickup area. Provide documentation in supplementary document noting this requirement (POA documents). Trash service is being proposed on street frontages not in accordance with Section 38.520.070.B.1 as alley access (fire lane) is present. 39. BMC 38.540.050 Number of parking spaces required. Provide parking calculations that show how the parking demand is generated without relaxations. Provide parking calculations with proposed relaxations implemented separate from base calculations without relaxations. Clarify parking Tnn. A0A_cuo_1)1401 TUG AAOrT I MARI G DI Arc Page 5 of 7 BOZEMAN M T Community Development calculation as commercial parking demand must utilize floor area as defined in this section and not gross floor area provided in table. Provide parking calculations of plan set coversheet per PLS form. 40. BMC 38.540.030 Structured parking facility development standards.The proposed NE corner of the site does not comply with structured parking requirements or block frontage transparency requirements per BMC for landscaped frontage. The application and design must propose compliance.with one or the other or proposed relaxations to the standards.See comment related to grade definition in 38.700.080. 41. BMC 38.540.050.A.2.c(6)Clarify proposed reductions for bicycle parking and shower facilities as they apply to each building with those facilities. 42. BMC 38.540.050:A.1.b(3)provide information on car share as required in Administrative Policy 2017- 1. Clarify car share reduction in parking calculation for residential uses only. 43. BMC 38.540.050.A.4 provide bicycle parking requirement calculation in parking calculations. Provide bicycle parking locations for all buildings per SP1 and to show compliance with standards. 44. BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Provide site plan for offsite parking that demonstrates the proposed lot meets all requirements of the BMC and the off-site parking code section. Clarify the uses proposed to utilize the offsite parking and provide exhibit showing compliance with distance requirements per use. Provide draft long term parking agreement or draft deed restriction in order to demonstrate compliance with BMC 38.540.070.6. 45. BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Clarify proposed ownership, timing for entitlement and construction of proposed offsite parking lot. Clarify proposed use of the balance of the property at the time'of construction of off-site parking lot. 46. BMC 38.550.030 and 38.220.080. Landscape plan does not match civil plan or architectural site plan and does not reflect proposed buildings 47. BMC 38.550.050.E Project proposes maximum slope and grade that exceeds standards. Clarify landscaping along north and east property boundaries. Clarify proposed slopes along Aspen Street and Ida Street. 48. BMC 38.560.030 Prohibited signs.The proposed sign on building 5(community building) attached to the mechanical equipment is not a wall sign. It is a roof sign which is prohibited.A relaxation may be proposed to allow a roof sign on the community building. Provide clarification on proposed sign proposal for this building. 49. BMC 38.560.060.A Non Residential Sign Standards. Provide building frontage dimensions and sign calculations for all nonresidential buildings (4,5,6) and add to comprehensive sign plan. 50. BMC 38.700.080. Grade definition. Provide more detailed exhibits of the north and east street frontages of the site that demonstrate the relationship of the parking garage and the overall building heights proposed in relation to the finished grade which is the lowest point of elevation of the finished surface of the ground between the exterior wall of a building and a point five feet distance from the building.The site sections in AS.301 and AS.302 need additional clarity along Aspen Street and Ida Street. Clarify finished grade in relation to the proposed gabion retaining walls and the proposed sidewalk along these elevations.Show relationship of accurate finished grade to proposed parking garage structure with accurate floor to ceiling heights shown at garage level. Parking garage shown with 9'floor to ceiling height on those exhibits, clarify if this is accurate. Bozeman, NIT 59771-1230 rnn. nnA_rQ1)_1)101 TWr AA(1CT I 1\/AQI C of ArC Page 6 of 7 BOZ E MAN MT Community Development ENGINEERING COMMENTS Engineering Division,Griffin Nielsen.,gnielsen@bozeman.net,406-582-2279 1. Engineering comments are pending. ADDITIONAL DIVISION COMMENTS Building Division; Bob Risk brisk@bozeman.net 406-582-2377 1. Handicap accessible parking required for all uses.An accessible path to an accessible building entrance from all the parking areas must be provided. 2. Accessible pathways between all buildings is required. Fire Department;Scott Mueller smueller@bozeman.net 406-582-2386 1. Fire accesses must be noted and maintained during construction phases. Stormwater Division; Kyle Mehrens ikmehrens@bozeman.net 406-582-2270 Water and Sewer Division;John Alston ialston@bozeman.net 406-582-3200 Forestry Division;Alex Nordquest; anordguest@bozeman.net 406-582-3205 1. Coordinate with the Forestry Division on tree pit design and tree species selection for street trees. Special species selection is required for planting under power lines. 2. Provide sleeves/conduit for irrigation lines for all tree pits. NorthWestern Energy; Cammy Dooley;cammy.doolev@northwestern.com 1. Overhead power lines may require additional building setback in order to provide clearances. 2. A ten foot front setback utility easement is required on all street frontages. 3. Coordinate for any interior ten foot utility easements that maybe required. 4. Utility plan is required for this site with the preliminary PUD submittal. Parks and Recreation;Thom White twhite@bozeman.net 1. The City's current adopted parkland cash in lieu valuation is$1.50 per square foot per City resolution 4938. 2. Provide parkland calculation and table on plan sheet cover page. Solid Waste Division; Russ Ward rward@bozeman.net 406-582-3238 1. Clarifications to proposed solid waste plan are required. 2. BMC 38.520.070.E Location and design of service areas. Service areas for trash service are not approved by the Sanitation Division. Service areas for Building 1 and Building 4 do not include ramps or a safe and accessible locations for trash dumpster pick up.Clarify individuals responsible for moving the trash dumpsters to pickup area. Provide documentation in supplementary document noting this requirement(POA documents).Trash service is being proposed on street frontages not in accordance with Section 38.520.070.B.1 as alley access (fire lane) is present. Future Impact Fees: Please note that future building permit applications will require payment of the required transportation, water, sewer and fire impact fees according to the City of Bozeman adopted impact fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance. If you desire an estimate of the O © P.O. :oBozem� 1 11 416861 � 1• i • �� • 1 O O Mr). TUC: AAr)rT I IVnRI C DI Arl: Page 7 of 7 BOZEMANmT Community Development required impact fees according to current rates please contact the Department of Community Development and/or visit www.bozeman.net. Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 mn. TUG AAOrT i ivnRi G Di nrG 40? BOZEMAW" Planning November 7, 2018 • Thinktank Design Group, Inc. 33 North Black Ave. Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Cottonwood and Ida Preliminary PUD 18516 Dear Sirs and Madams, Your application for a Preliminary Planned Unit Development(PPUD)has been received and is under review. Comments from the Development Review Committee will be issued on or after November 29, 2018. The preliminary PUD plan requires review by the Design Review Board (DRB). The DRB is scheduled following DRC review and any required revisions that may be necessary to your PUD prior to continued review. If you have any questions, contact me at 582-2259 or bkrueQer(CDbozeman.net. Respectfully, Brian Krueger Development Review Manager C: Bangtail Partners, LLC PO Box 10195 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Imperial Development LLC 33 North Black Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. a MT �1 B 0 Z E M MOP Community Development ~` RC REVISION AND CORRECTION SUBMITTAL FORM ADDITIONAL OR REVISED PLANS OR DOCUMENTS FOR AN ACTIVE PROJECT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS COMPLETED FORM. MAILED RE-SUBMITTALS THAT DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM OR THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE CORRECT NUMBER OF COPIES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. FEES ARE REQUIRED FOR THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS +, All revisions / correction submittals must contain the following: R A completed RC revision/correction submittal form. ❑■ The same number of copies and sizes and formats (including digital) as required for the initial application. Plans and documents, including digital files must meet plans, specifications and naming protocols. See form PLS. 0 Revised drawings must be updated with a new current date on each revised sheet.Title sheet table of contents/plan schedule must be updated with new dates for each sheet modified. If complete plans sets are updated, retain the original date on sheets that have not been updated or revised. ❑ A written narrative that shows an itemized summary of your submittal and description of each change or revision in detail or document. Changes to plans sheets must include sheet and detail numbers. ❑■ All changes must be clouded or highlighted on each plan set. ■❑ Legal documents, studies, letters or other documentation must have a clear date of revision on the front page. ❑ Fees are required for a third and subse : aiQ° =rs, 4o rected materials. The fee is 1/a of the total original application fee. On Re-submittal of plans must be comple spy ,if ' iy� of I ` s are modified. No individual sheets will be accepted. l� 261 ■❑ RC form must be the first item in all re ubmit�lPtis.1�';r;. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Application 18516 Application PPUD file #: type: Project Name: Cottonwood and Ida Mixed Use Contact Name: Thinktank Design Group Inc. ( Erik Nelson) Phone: 406-539-1176 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com Revision and Correction RC Page 1 of 2 Revision Date 3-20-18 Required Forms: PLS 0 SUBMITTAL TYPE NEW CHANGE: A revision or change that the applicant has made to a plan that is currently under review that is new and has not been reviewed before. CORRECTION: A correction to the plans that is an applicant response to a correction letter written by the City to the applicant. If both types are being submitted, the written narrative required above listing itemized changes must clearly differentiate between changes and corrections and each must be clearly labeled. Changes to preliminarily approved plans or approved plans are processed under the modification application process, use form MOD for those changes. Re-submittal of plans must be complete plan sets if individual sheets are modified. No individual sheets will be accepted. CITY USE ONLY Date Checked and a R received: � '0-1 �hb ( -1 received by: j Number of sets Includes digital submitted: copy Y/N:: 11 I Superion , , updated? Planner/Engineer: Y/N: DRC Required? Date routed to Y N. Engineer: 0i12 / 8iLbO, If no DRC, date comments du to planner. 10 working days from submittal date typical: CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406-582-2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Revision and Correction RC Page 2 of 2 Revision Date 3-20-18 Required Forms: PLS it To: Brian Krueger City of Bozeman Planning Department Re: Cottonwood and Ida Mixed Use project PPUD Resubmittal Plan file#18516 Date: 1-24-19 Dear Brian, We are providing this Revision and Corrections submittal to address both planning and engineering comments provided. We felt that there were enough clarifications to the project that it warranted submitting an entirely new Preliminary PUD document set. This includes all the original documents required by the PPUD checklist. We have also provided the comment resolutions letters attached to this for easy reference in finding where we have documented the corrections. We look forward to the moving through the review process and brining this project to the community as soon as possible to get their feedback on the high-level items. Please don't hesitate to contact us should you have some initial thoughts or clarifications needed with this extensive submittal. Sincerely, Erik Nelson _._., Thinktank Design Group Inc. r ,AN 28 2019 �j!r p�4'Al l COMMUNITY U !'I'�FN Page li T H I N K TA N K D E S I G N 33 N.BLACK AVE BOZEMAN MONTANA 59715 406.587.3628 thin ktankarchitects.com info@thinktankarchitects.com Response to Comments From: Development Review Committee Re: Cottonwood And Ida Preliminary PUD, Application 18516 Date: November 28, 2018 PLANNING COMMENTS Planning Division, Brian Krueger, bkrueger@bozeman.net, 406-582-2259 Section 3 - REQUIRED CODE CORRECTIONS All references are to the Bozeman Municipal Code. 1. BMC 38.220.010. Update form Al project information. Update block frontage to frontage designated on the Community Development Block Frontage Map. The map shows all frontages as mixed block frontage. Many internal pathways include residential units that face the pathways those areas are subject to the special residential block frontage standards. All block frontages must additionally be noted on the site plan. Sheet AS.111 titled 'Overall Floor Plan - Level l' identifies block frontage along internal pathways in compliance with Bozeman Municipal Code section 38.510.030.j for special residential block frontage. 2. BMC 38.220.010. Update form Al number 5. To provide the title and position of the individuals signing on behalf of the LLC's. The new Al submitted does not show the title and position of individuals who have signed the application form. Al form has been updated in the revised documents in Section 1 3. BMC 38.220.010 38.220.080 At a minimum one site plan exhibit must have the majority of the required data and detailing and annotations required by the SP1 form. No one exhibit shows the required information. Sheet AS.101 titled 'Architectural Site Plan'contains a majority of required data, detailing, and annotations available on 24x36"sheet.All additional detailed information is available on sheets ASA10-111 titled 'Overall Floor Plan: 4. BMC 38.220.010 and 38.220.080. The other specific site plan sheets that demonstrate specific elements of the plan must have the relevant data related to what is being shown. For example the parking sheet AS.105 does not include site vision triangles which are relevant to on street parking allowances. The parking sheet is not annotated with parking dimensions for spaces nor does it provide the angle of the on-street parking proposed on East Cottonwood. Another example, the open space plan does not provide dimensions for all open space areas, does not clearly allocate open space per building, does not show a proposed easement area to allow public access and clearly differentiate between onsite residential open space, usable commercial open space and PUD open space for points purposes. All detailed plans must be updated to provide the relevant information. Sheet AS.101 titled 'Architectural Site Plan' has been revised to contain comprehensive, aggregated information that references separate detailed 'Overall Floor Plan'sheets. Sheet AS.110 titled 'Overall Floor Plan - Level 0' contains detailed parking information including garage, on-street, & off-site parking calculations. In addition, site triangles, parking dimensions, angle of on-street parking proposed on East Cottonwood. Sheet AS.102 titled 'Site Usage Information' provides dimensions for all open space areas, clearly allocates open space per building, and shows a proposed easement area to allow public access and clearly differentiate between onsite residential open space, usable commercial open space and PUD open space for points purposes. 5. BMC 38.220.010 the Plans and Specifications (Form PLS) requirements are not met throughout the application materials and plans. Annotations and measured dimensions are not thorough and are not provided consistently on plans per requirements, Cover sheet data not provided as required: no parking calculations, area schedules, dwelling unit types, FAR, net residential density open space calculations, parkland calculations, etc. and other required site data are provided on cover sheet, a parkland tracking table is not provided, etc. Site plan index sheet must include date of preparation of all sheets to control versioning through the review per PLS. Sheets ASA 10 thru ASA 14 titled 'Overall Floor Plans' include annotations and measured dimensions consistently. Sheet AS.000 titled 'Title Sheet' includes date of preparation of all sheets. Parking calculations, area schedules, dwelling unit types, FAR, net residential density open space calculations, parkland calculations, and other required site data are provide on sheets AS.101 titled 'Architectural Site Plan'and AS.102 titled 'Site Usage Information.' 6. BMC 38.220.010 Digital files of PUD documents not separated as required in PLS form. Name each document separately per digital naming protocol in PLS document. Correct digital files have been provided with this RC form 7. BMC 38.220.010 update cover sheet of the PUD document to reflect the current owners of the property, Bangtail Partners, LLC per the title report. The cover sheet submitted shows the owners as Imperial Development, LLC, not the owner of the property per the title report. Sheet AS.000 has been updated to reflect current owners of the property, Bangtail Partners, LLC per the title report. 8. BMC 38.220.050 Weed control plan not approved by Weed Control District as required. This projects weed control plan has been submitted to the County Weed Control district.We anticipate approval of this plan, and will have this complete prior to the Final PUD. We would like this to continue as a condition of approval. 9. BMC 38.220.300 and 38.220.080 Supplementary Documents. The proposed ownership of the development is a condominium, as such per requirements draft supplementary documents must be submitted with the preliminary plan. Provide draft documents as required for 38.220.310 and 38.220.320. Section 3.08 provides a high level outline and diagram of the proposed ownership and Appendix L provides the full draft of the Condominium documents. 10. BMC 38.220.010 Utilities and utility rights of way and proposed utility easements for gas, electric, and communications not provided per code and SP1. An additional sheet (CM) has been included in this submittal to show the utility easements for gas, electric and communications 11. BMC 38.220.080.A.2.g requires PUD plans to provide detailed topography, transportation, street, traffic and utility information to a distance of 200 feet from the exterior perimeter of a PUD site. This information is not provided. Additional topographic survey of the surrounding roadways/areas has been provided on shee C2.0. 12. BMC 38.220.080 Phased site plan information is incomplete. See sub. A.2.q. The proposal no longer intends to have any phasing. 13. BMC 38.220.080 provide information of any proposed separate building occupancy phasing and how the required parking and open space will be provided in concurrent amounts for all buildings proposed for phasing. See comment on 12 above 14. BMC 38.220.080 Irrigation water. Clarify proposed water demand for irrigation system. Clarify the nature of the existing well and water right to support the new demand. City Engineering has provided estimates for water consumption we have provided these for the irrigation.We have provided communication from the DNRC for the potential use of an existing well on site and are expecting that we will be able to do so.We would like to have this as a condition of approval and will complete the exempt well water paperwork prior. 15. BMC 38.220.120.A.2.a(4).The phasing plan indicates PUD concurrent construction of buildings and on and offsite infrastructure is desired. Clarify if PUD concurrent construction is proposed. If so provide the request along with a concurrent construction plan and respond to the criteria and provide all information for the requirements of PUD concurrent construction in BMC 38.270.030.D. We have provided a narrative in Section 5 outlining how we intend to complete the concurrent construction.And will comply will all of the PUD concurrent construction requirements listed in BMC.38.270.030.11) as part of the plan. 16. BMC 38.320.050.0 Table of Form and Intensity Standards Minimum setbacks required for the NEHMU district. The project does not meet setback requirements with the underlying lot configurations. The lots must be aggregated or otherwise configured through the applicable subdivision exemption review process in order to meet requirements.The final signed mylars have been provided to our office to satisfy this code requirement. The amended plat must be filed prior to final PUD approval. An additional sheet (C1.1) has been included in this submittal to show sight triangles, proposed (reconfiguration of) lot lines, and public access easements. The requirement to provide final signed mylars and approved amended plat is noted and will be filed prior to final PUD approval but not provided at this time. 17. BMC 38.320.050.0 Table of Form and Intensity Standards Minimum setbacks required for the NEHMU district. The proposed lot configuration includes a zero lot line configuration between proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3. The code does not authorize the use of a zero lot line configuration in the form and intensity standards for NEHMU.A relaxation must be requested to allow this condition. A relaxation has been requested for this item see SEction 3, Relaxation #4 18. BMC 38.400.010.A.8 Second or emergency access. Clarify the right of way proposed for secondary emergency access. Is the proposed a dedicated right of way to city, access easement, public access easement, or other? Provide dimensions and total extent of proposed secondary and emergency access areas noted as fire lane on plan sets. 0 0 Sheets AS.101 titled 'Architectural Site Plan'and AS.111 titled 'Overall Floor Plan - Level Vindicate dimensions and extent of emergency access areas, including removable bollards.This is also shown on plan sheet CM. 19. BMC 38.400.090.C.3.c Drive accesses for multiple tenant commercial building or complexes/centers, or industrial drive accesses must be set back a minimum of 20 feet from adjacent properties unless such drive access is approved as a shared drive access. Clarify access shown as fire lane and how it complies with standards. No shared access to properties to the west is proposed. Given the access is only for emergency vehicles we have had discussions with Engineering and they have indicated that this will be acceptable with the limited use of the access. 20. BMC 38.400.100 and 38.220.080 Street vision triangles not shown on plans. Clarify locations and compliance with standards for all street intersections and drive way intersections take into account all retaining walls, landscape berms and clarify site vision at structured parking entrance. Sheet AS.101 titled 'Architectural Site Plan' includes street vision triangles that comply with standards for all street and driveway intersections. These are shown on C1.1 and the Landscape plans for clarification of concerns with retaining walls, landscape berms, etc. 21. BMC 38.410.060.13 and 38.220.080 Private utility easements not shown or proposed. An Additional Sheet C1.1 has been included in this submittal to show the utility easements for gas, electric, and communications. 22. BMC 38.410.060.B.3 No private utility plan provided as required with preliminary plan when concurrent construction is proposed. We have provided an initial concurrent construction plan and will add more detail as this project proceeds through planning and will most certainly be complete prior to Final PUD.We would like to carry this as a condition of approval moving forward. 23. BMC 38.410.060.B.4 Encroachments proposed in required ten foot private utility easement areas required along all streets. No written approval from all utility companies is provided as required. The current and entire list of utility companies operating in Montana can be attained from the Montana Public Service Commission. Clarify and update C1.00 and AS1.01 as they show encroachments differently. We have proposed minor architectural encroachments well at heights 15'to 20'above grade and only 2' out.We are waiting on a letter(s)from the utility companies.We anticipate that these will be accepted and would like to hold this as a conditional of approval given the minor nature of the encroachments. 24. BMC 38.410.120 Mail Delivery. Clarify location of mail delivery area on site plan, proposed detail submitted too general to analyze any impacts to pedestrian 'circulation, utility easements and services. Provide footprint and size dimensions of cluster box and required pad, proposed access, and other details to clarify. Sheet AS.111 titled 'Overall Floor Plan - Level 1' identifies location of mail delivery areas and sheet AS.104 titled 'Site Details' includes details of proposed mailboxes. 25. BMC 38.430.020.A planned unit development may not be applied to development that does not have one or more principal uses or structures on contiguous parcels. No entitlement or relaxations may be granted for the offsite parking lot through this application process. All parcels are contiguous as part of this proposal.We intend to lease parking from as separate project that will adhere to all Site Plan criteria. 26. BMC 38.430.030.A.4.b Relaxations (deviations) Item 1 applicant must clarify specific code section and requested relaxation from code standard. The application must also request a deviation for apartment building use. See updated list of Relaxations in Section 3 41 0 27. BMC 38.430.030..A.4.b Relaxations (deviations) Item 2 separate relaxation from front setback in form and intensity table and requested modifications to block frontage standards. Clarify relaxations requested. Each code section to be modified must be identified specifically. See updated list of Relaxations in Section 3 28. BMC 38.430.030.A.4.b Relaxations (deviations) Item 3 We recommend that instead of modifying the side setback as requested that the relaxation state that zero lot line conditions are allowed as per the other zones identified in BMC 38.320.050.0 Table of Form and Intensity Standards. Add allowance for zero lot line to minimum setbacks required for the NEHMU district. See updated list of Relaxations in Section 3 29. BMC 38.430.030.A.4.b Relaxations (deviations) Item 5. Clarify last statement in that section that the application requests a relaxation of 20%to all non-residential parking requirements consistent with code language. Eliminate reference to commercial parking. See updated list of Relaxations in Section 3 30. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(a) PUD performance. Not eligible for affordable housing performance points as the proposed units do not meet the definition of affordable housing in 38.700.020. PUD affordable housing is defined separately from the requirements of BMC 38.380. See updated PUD performance points.We are going to provide affordable rental units at 65%AMI or below and through coordination with HRDC. 31. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(b) PUD performance. Not eligible for this performance unless a specific public access easement is proposed and the area is defined. Provide clarifications. We have provided public access easements for public use of the plaza. See updated list of PUD performance points as well as plan sheet C1.1 32. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(d) PUD performance. This site is eligible to claim credit for brownfield and underutilized sites with the appropriate calculations provided. We have provided the calculations for this point, see updated list of PUD performance points in Section 3 33. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(e) PUD performance. Not eligible for the designed to meet LEED-ND performance points as the project is not conditionally approved nor does it have precertification per requirements. See updated list of PUD performance points along with Appendix K for documentation from our LEED consultant regarding precertification. 34. BMC 38.430.080.E.2(7)(i) PUD performance. Not eligible, the recycling transfer station referenced in the code is a community level transfer station similar in size and scale to those provided by the Gallatin Solid Waste Management District and not recycling collection for site residents and guests. We have removed this from our performance point list. See updated list in Section 3 35. BMC 38.520.060.E On-site residential open space. Provide clarification of proposed residential open space by building. Clarify which open space credit and allotment per building. Provide calculation and percentage of common space that applies to each building. Provide dimensions on the plans for all open space areas per SP1 and PLS documents. Clearly separate onsite residential open space and required PUD performance open space and usable commercial open space in calculations and exhibits and provide code references to clearly differentiate the required spaces. Show how the proposed public access will be achieved. Sheet AS.102 titled 'Site Usage Information' provides clarification, allotment, calculations and percentages, dimensions, exhibits, and code references for open space. 36. BMC 38.520.060.0 No usable commercial open space designated or provided as required. Sheet AS.102 titled 'Site Usage Information' provides calculation and location of usable commercial open space. 37. BMC 38.520.070 Location and design of service areas. No service areas identified for gas and electric entrance locations into the buildings or proposed methods to separate and mitigate impacts as required. Show gas and electric locations as required per SP1 on entire site and general proposed locations for private utility entrance locations into the buildings. Sheet AS.101 titled 'Architectural Site Plan' includes locations of gas and electric entrance locations. 38. BMC 38.520.070.B Location and design of service areas. Service areas for trash service are not approved by the Sanitation Division. Service areas for Building 1 and Building 4 do not include ramps or a safe and accessible locations for trash dumpster pick up. Clarify individuals responsible for moving the trash dumpsters to pickup area. Provide documentation in supplementary document noting this requirement(POA documents). Trash service is being proposed on street frontages not in accordance with Section 38.520.070.B.1 as alley access (fire lane) is present. See section 5 for our proposed solid waste plan along with the plan sheets C2.1 39. BMC 38.540.050 Number of parking spaces required. Provide parking calculations that show how the parking demand is generated without relaxations. Provide parking calculations with proposed relaxations implemented separate from base calculations without relaxations. Clarify parking calculation as commercial parking demand must utilize floor area as defined in this section and not gross floor area provided in table. Provide parking calculations of plan set cover sheet per PLS form. See plan sheet ASA 10 for clarification to the parking calculations. 40. BMC 38.540.030 Structured parking facility development standards. The proposed NE corner of the site does not comply with structured parking requirements or block frontage transparency requirements per BMC for landscaped frontage. The application and design must propose compliance with one or the other or proposed relaxations to the standards. See comment related to grade definition in 38.700.080. See updated elevations AS.201 for transparency calculations and AS.303 for clarification of this. 41. BMC 38.540.050.A.2.c(6) Clarify proposed reductions for bicycle parking and shower facilities as they apply to each building with those facilities. See plan sheet AS.110 for clarification to the parking calculations. 42. BMC 38.540.050.A.1.b(3) provide information on car share as required in Administrative Policy 2017-1. Clarify car share reduction in parking calculation for residential uses only. The project is no longer utilizing car share in the parking calculations. 43. BMC 38.540.050.A.4 provide bicycle parking requirement calculation in parking calculations. Provide bicycle parking locations for all buildings per SP1 and to show compliance with standards. See plan sheet ASA10 for clarification to the parking calculations 44. BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Provide site plan for offsite parking that demonstrates the proposed lot meets all requirements of the BMC and the off-site parking code section. Clarify the uses proposed to utilize the offsite parking and provide exhibit showing compliance with distance requirements per use. Provide draft long term parking agreement or draft deed restriction in order to demonstrate compliance with BMC 38.540.070.6. See sheet AS.100 and AS.110 for clarification on this. 45. BMC 38.540.070 Off-site parking. Clarify proposed ownership,timing for entitlement and construction of proposed offsite parking lot. Clarify proposed use of the balance of the property at the time of construction of off-site parking lot. The off site parking will be owned separately from this project and the spaces will be leased by this project.The construction will be concurrent with the construction of this project. There is an application in the Planning department outlining the design and layout of this off-site lot. See plan file # 18534 0 0 46. BMC 38.550.030 and 38.220.080. Landscape plan does not match civil plan or architectural site plan and does not reflect proposed buildings. Sheets AS.101 titled 'Architectural Site Plan,' C2.1 titled 'Site Plan,'and L1.00 titled 'Material Plan'are coordinated and consistently reflect proposed buildings. 47. BMC 38.550.050.E Project proposes maximum slope and grade that exceeds standards. Clarify landscaping along north and east property boundaries. Clarify proposed slopes along Aspen Street and Ida Street. Sheets AS.303 titled 'Street Cross Sections,'C3.0 titled 'Grading Plan; L1.00 titled 'Materials Plan,'and 4.00 titled 'Grading Plan'show slope,grading, and landscaping along Aspen and Ida streets. 48. BMC 38.560.030 Prohibited signs. The proposed sign on building 5 (community building) attached to the mechanical equipment is not a wall sign. It is a roof sign which is prohibited. A relaxation may be proposed to allow a roof sign on the community building. Provide clarification on proposed sign proposal for this building. See revised sign plan Section 8 49. BMC 38.560.060.A Non Residential Sign Standards. Provide building frontage dimensions and sign calculations for all nonresidential buildings (4,5,6) and add to comprehensive sign plan. Sheet AS.111 titled 'Overall Floor Plan - Level 1' provides block frontage dimensions and sheet AS.201 titled 'Street Elevations' provides signage locations and calculations . 50. BMC 38.700.080. Grade definition. Provide more detailed exhibits of the north and east street frontages of the site that demonstrate the relationship of the parking garage and the overall building heights proposed in relation to the finished grade which is the lowest point of elevation of the finished surface of the ground between the exterior wall of a building and a point five feet distance from the building. The site sections in AS.301 and AS.302 need additional clarity along Aspen Street and Ida Street. Clarify finished grade in relation to the proposed gabion retaining walls and the proposed sidewalk along these elevations. Show relationship of accurate finished grade to proposed parking garage structure with accurate floor to ceiling heights shown at garage level. Parking garage shown with 9'floor to ceiling height on those exhibits, clarify if this is accurate. Sheets AS. 201 titled 'Street Elevations'and AS.303 titled 'Street Cross Sections' provide detailed exhibits of the north and east street frontages. ADDITIONAL DIVISION COMMENTS Building Division; Bob Risk brisk@bozeman.net 406-582-2377 1. Handicap accessible parking required for all uses.An accessible path to an accessible building entrance from all the parking areas must be provided. Sheet ASA10 titled 'Overall Floor Plan - Level 0' identifies accessible paths from accessible parking spaces to accessible building entrances. 2. Accessible pathways between all buildings is required. Sheet ASA11 titled 'Overall Floor Plan - Level 1' identifies accessible paths from public sidewalk to accessible building entrances. Fire Department; Scott Mueller smueller@bozeman.net 406-582-2386 1. Fire accesses must be noted and maintained during construction phases. Forestry Division; Alex Nordquest; anordquest@bozeman.net 406-582-3205 1. Coordinate with the Forestry Division on tree pit design and tree species selection for street trees. Special species selection is required for planting under power lines. Landscape design has been reviewed and coordinated with Forestry Division. 2. Provide sleeves/conduit for irrigation lines for all tree pits. Building specifications requires sleeves/conduit for irrigation lines for all tree pits. NorthWestern Energy; Cammy Dooley; cammy.dooley@northwestern.com 1. Overhead power lines may require additional building setback in order to provide clearances. After meeting on-site with Derek Westveer, we are hoping to have power lines buried as they front the proposed buildings. The lines would go aerial at the northeast, southeast, and southwest corners of the site. 2. A ten foot front setback utility easement is required on all street frontages. Acknowledged 3. Coordinate for any interior ten foot utility easements that may be required. Utility easements are now shown in the CM sheet. 4. Utility plan is required for this site with the preliminary PUD submittal. See sheet C5.0 Parks and Recreation; Thom White twhite@bozeman.net 1. The City's current adopted parkland cash in lieu valuation is $1.50 per square foot per City resolution 4938. Acknowledged- see appendix H for communications with Parks Department 2. Provide parkland calculation and table on plan sheet cover page. See sheet AS.102 for parkland tracking table Solid Waste Division; Russ Ward rward@bozeman.net 406-582-3238 1. Clarifications to proposed solid waste plan are required. See updated solid waste plan in Section S. 2. BMC 38.520.070.13 Location and design of service areas. Service areas for trash service are not approved by the Sanitation Division. Service areas for Building 1 and Building 4 do not include ramps or a safe and accessible locations for trash dumpster pick up. Clarify individuals responsible for moving the trash dumpsters to pickup area. Provide documentation in supplementary document noting this requirement(POA documents). Trash service is being proposed on street frontages not in accordance with Section 38.520.070.B.1 as alley access (fire lane) is present. Sheet AS.111 titied 'Overall Floor Plan - Level 1' identifies trash service area locations. These locations are also noted on plan sheet C2.0. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: 1. Bozeman Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 38.400.010.A.states:All streets must comply with the adopted growth policy and/or transportation plan.The arrangement, type,extent,width,grade and location of all streets must be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets,to topographical conditions,to public convenience and safety, and to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such streets.The design standards contained in these regulations apply to all construction,reconstruction and paving of streets. Review authority for exceptions or modifications to this section is specified in division 38.220. a. The traffic impact study must provide according to UDC section 38.220.060.A.12. and 38.400.060.,the following updates are required prior to preliminary PUD approval: i. The report must be stamped by a professional engineering registered in the state of Montana. The final traffic report has been stamped by the author who is both a Montana Professional Engineer as well as a Professional Traffic Operations Engineer. ii. The report should include the existing and projects traffic counts on North Wallace Ave within the study. Per UDC Section 38.220.060.A.12.f.2.c, North Wallace Avenue was not included in our analysis as the site does not have a drive way access directly onto North Wallace Avenue and is only classified as a Local Street by the Bozeman Transportation Master Plan. The proposed development is expected to add 24/27 trips on North Wallace Avenue in the AM/PM peak hours. iii. The study must include the 15 year projection for the intersection of the City's arterial and collector streets within the study area. In prior discussions with the City Engineer,a 15-year future horizon with a constant yearly AGR is unrealistic in certain situations where vacant land is at a minimum,connectivity to major arterials is limited,and major intersections (collector/arterials)are fully built-out. Additionally,the Transportation and Land Development Manual by ITE • i states the suggested horizon year analysis for a small development size (<500 peak hour trips) is opening year of full development buildout. Therefore,the most appropriate horizon year of future analysis is 2020 when full buildout and occupancy is expected as reported in the traffic study. 2. UDC Section 38.400.050.A.1 states:All streets and roads providing access to,and within, the proposed development shall meet the following standards: 1. Right-of-way width and construction standards contained in this chapter,the most recently adopted long range transportation plan,the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy,and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications shall apply. Street sections have been attached and included as part of the PUD submittal package—meeting all of the requirements of UDC Section 38.400.050.A.1 above will not be possible as the existing ROW width along Ida Ave.is only 45'in width and a Bozeman street typical section for this ROW width does not exist. Additionally,the south half of the Cottonwood Street roadway section is atypical and existing from the recently-constructed improvements to the south. Therefore,we have proposed street sections incorporating previous feedback from Bozeman City Engineering and Planning Staff. a. The back out angled parking proposed along East Cottonwood is non-standard and must be requested with the PUD.The property owner's association will be required to maintain the proposed parking including snow plowing and maintenance of the parking surfaces.The property owner's association documents must include language to this effect and be reviewed and approved prior to final PUD approval. The back-out angled parking has been included and requested in the PUD document. The required snow plowing,maintenance,etc.is acknowledged. Property owner's association documents will include such language and be approved prior to final PUD approval. b. City standard delineators must be installed at the ends of the parking stall islands along East Cottonwood. City standard delineators are now called out on sheet C2.0 (and other sheets.) c. The proposed drive access bulb-out on East Aspen Street is non-standard and must be removed. The previously-proposed bulb-out on East Aspen has been removed and is no longer proposed. See sheet C2.0 (and other sheets.) 3. UDC Section 38.400.010.A.8.:Second or emergency access.To facilitate traffic movement, the provision of emergency services and the placement of utility easements,all developments must be provided with a second means of access. If,in the judgment of the development review committee (DRC),a second dedicated right-of-way cannot be provided for reasons of topography or other physical conditions,the developer must provide an emergency access,built to the standards detailed in these regulations. a. The applicant must provide emergency service vehicle turning diagrams to ensure that emergency service vehicles can reasonable access the site prior to preliminary PUD approval and clarify the following: 0 0 A vehicle turning movement has been included on the new sheet C1.1, illustrating emergency vehicular access into the emergency vehicle access/fire lane. i. Sheet AS.302 shows an encroachment from the Misco Mill on to the property line and emergency vehicle access road,this is inconsistent with the plan view sheets provided.The applicant must verify that the Misco Mill does not encroach into the emergency vehicle access road at any point. There is an existing satellite dish that encroaches into the emergency vehicle access approximately mid-way along the western property line. This has been verbally discussed with the adjacent property owner and will be removed from the emergency vehicle access/fire lane. ii. Sheet AS.101 shows an encroachment from the Building 5 on to the emergency vehicle access road. Yes,there is an encroachment from Building 5 on to the emergency vehicle access. This has been discussed with Deputy Fire Chief Scott Mueller and he has approved the fire lane width at the location of this encroachment. A screenshot of his e-mail to this effect,written on 10/17/2018 is included,below: Erik Nelson From: Scott Mueller<SMueller@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent: Wednesday,October 17,2018 3:08 PM To: Erik Nelson Subject: RE:erik@thinktankarchitects.com Erik, To formalize my comments on the emergency access regarding the Cottonwood and Ida project,I would support the slight relaxation of the required 20 foot wide road rule diminished to 17'6"on a portion of the road. If access is designed with vehicular traffic barriers,those would be operational in all weather conditions by the fire department. We suggest gates. Also the access road would be maintained year-round. Please contact me if you require further. Thanks Scott Mueller Deputy Fire Chief-Prevention-Fire Marshal Bozeman Fire Department 34 N.Rouse Ave Bozeman,MT.59771 Office (406)582.2353 Mobile(406)589.6271 smuellergDbozeman.net www.bozemanfore.com "F Afce acd, fi9ivt�" BOZEMANMT FIRE 01PARTMENT 4. UDC Section 38.400.090.D.2 states:These standards apply to the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and intersections,and the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and other public and/or private accesses. a. The proposed drive accesses on to East Aspen Street do not meet the access do not meet the City's access separation requirements.The site must separation requirements or receive a deviation prior to preliminary PUD approval. 0 • The proposed"drive access,"for the emergency vehicle access ought not to be considered a drive access but rather a drivable surface in the event of an emergency. The emergency vehicle access drive/fire lane will be protected with removable bollards or gate system and will not be used for deliveries, pedestrian drop-off,etc. This applies to both the north and south end of the emergency vehicle access. Therefore,we only propose one drive access into the site (specifically,into the parking garage) along Aspen Street. No drive accesses are proposed along Ida Avenue nor Cottonwood Street. b. The proposed emergency vehicle access is with the 20 foot required separation from the adjacent property to the west. The proposed"drive access,"for the emergency vehicle access ought not to be considered a drive access but rather a drivable surface in the event of an emergency. The emergency vehicle access drive/fire lane will be protected with removable bollards or gate system and will not be used for deliveries, pedestrian drop-off,etc. This applies to both the north and south end of the emergency vehicle access. Therefore,we only propose one drive access into the site(specifically,into the parking garage) along Aspen Street. No drive accesses are proposed along Ida Avenue nor Cottonwood Street. 5. UDC Section 38.400.100.0 states: Drive aisles and alleys.At the intersection of each driveway or alley with a street,no fence,wall or planting in excess of 30 inches above the street centerline grade is permitted within a triangular area where corners are defined by two points on the right-of-way line, 15 feet on each side of the centerline of the driveway or alley and a point on centerline ten feet outside the right-of-way.Any driveway or alley wider than 30 feet curb to curb at the right-of-way line must use the vision triangle standard for local streets when intersecting local, collector,or arterial streets. Note:We do not propose a driveway or alley wider than 30 feet curb-to-curb at the right-of-way line. a. Street vision triangles must be shown on the landscaping plans.The vision triangle may not be impeded by landscaping including boulevard trees.The proposed tree shown on the landscaping plan appear to impeded the vision triangle. Street vision triangles are now shown/included in landscaping plans. b. The street vision triangle for the emergency vehicle access on East Aspen street, shown on sheet C1.00,is impeded by the building to the west. Acknowledged. We do not propose the demolition or relocation of neighboring property/buildings. Please see our responses to comment#4, above. The emergency vehicle access will not act as a driveway access or access to the site but rather used only in case of emergency. c. The street vision triangle for the access to the underground parking area is incorrectly shown on sheet C1.00. The street vision triangle has been drawn and shown with a point 10-feet off of the property line with 15-foot offsets on each side of centerline as indicated in the comment#5,above. 6. UDC Section 38.410.060.A states:Where determined to be necessary,public and/or private easements shall be provided for private and public utilities,drainage,vehicular or pedestrian access,etc. An additional Sheet(C1.1) is included with this PUDP submittal package. This sheet illustrates easements pertinent to this project as well as lot line changes,and existing ROW. a. The applicant must provide an overall plan clearly denoting the locations of the existing and proposed right-of-way,property lines,and easements prior to preliminary PUD approval. An additional Sheet(C1.1) is included with this PUDP submittal package. This sheet illustrates easements pertinent to this project as well as lot line changes, and existing ROW. b. An amended plat must be completed prior to final PUD approval for any change in lot lines. Acknowledged. c. Public utility easements are required along each street the property fronts on as per UDC Section 38.410.060.B.2.a. No encroachment may be permitted with the approval from all utility companies. Acknowledged. d. The applicant must provide a public access easements for required public sidewalks located outside of the public right-of-way. Sheet C1.1 illustrates public pedestrian access easements for public sidewalks located outside of the public ROW. 7. UDC 38.410.070.A.1 states:The developer must install complete municipal water and sanitary sewer system facilities,or a system allowed by section 38.350.030.D,and may be required by the city to install municipal storm sewer system facilities.These systems must be installed in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city,and must conform with any applicable facilities plan.The city's requirements are contained in the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications,and by this reference these standards are incorporated into and made a part of these regulations.The developer must submit plans and specifications for the proposed facilities to the city and to the state department of environmental quality and must obtain their approvals prior to commencing construction of any municipal water,sanitary sewer or storm sewer system facilities. Acknowledged. Public infrastructure plans in conjunction with this PUD are forthcoming. a. Per City of Bozeman Design Standards and specifications Policy Manual Section V.D.2.c water main are required to perpendicularly cross sanitary sewer mains. Acknowledged. Any deviation required due to existing conditions would be submitted through the appropriate DEQ deviation process. b. The water and sewer design report must be stamped by a professional engineer register in the state of Montana and include the following additional information prior to final PUD approval: i. The residual pressures and velocity with in the surrounding distribution system while the fire flow plus max hour demand is provided for the development. The water and sewer design report,along with any updates based on PUD submittal process,will be stamped by a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Montana and will include residual pressures/velocities as specified prior to final PUD approval. 8. UDC Section 38.410.080.A.states:The developer must install complete drainage facilities in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city,and must conform to any applicable facilities plan and the terms of any approved site specific stormwater control plan.The city's requirements are contained in the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications,and by this reference these standards are incorporated into and made a part of these regulations.The developer must submit plans and specifications to the city and to the state department of environmental quality(if applicable),and must obtain their approvals prior to commencing construction of any drainage system facilities. Acknowledged. a. The applicant must submit a stormwater drainage report,certified by a professional engineering within the state of Montana,for the onsite and public right-of-way drainage and have the reports reviewed and approved prior to preliminary PUD approval. Acknowledged. The stormwater drainage report,along with any updates based on PUD submittal process,will be stamped by a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Montana. b. The geotechnical report notes the presents of groundwater at approximate depth of 7-8 feet with the possibility this elevation increasing. In addition the reports note this is of significant concern for the proposed subsurface parking area and provides a number of design recommendations.The application is unclear as to if any of the recommendation will be implemented.As a number of the recommendation may affect areas outside of the project the applicant must provide details of how the groundwater will be addressed on site with the engineer certified drainage report prior to preliminary PUD approval. The applicant is advised that the City do not permit sump pumps to discharge into the City infrastructure. Since the original PUDP submittal to the City,the proposed parking garage has been raised significantly. The current proposed finished slab elevation of the parking garage is 4768.00. This proposed slab elevation is approximately 5' below existing grade. The shallowest groundwater measured within the monitoring wells in the geotechnical report was 7.77'below existing grade. The date of this measurement was 4/30/2018. During monitoring, measurements ranged from 7.77'below existing grades to 10.00'below existing grades. c. The drainage infrastructure proposed on East Aspen is non-standard and should be located onsite within a public drainage easement.The proposed location may only be approved as a PUD relaxation and will require an encroachment permit.The system will must be maintained by the property owner's association. To clarify,the drainage infrastructure proposed is to facilitate drainage of public right-of-way storm drainage. As there is no regional stormwater facility,a drainage facility within the ROW would only serve to attenuate stormwater runoff from the public ROW. The proposed on-site stormwater detention facilities would be located on private property and would presumably not require any easements in favor of the City. 0 • d. The applicant must submit a stormwater maintenance plan for the proposed onsite stormwater system prior to preliminary PUD approval.The approved maintenance plan be included within the property owner's associate document prior to final PUD approval. Acknowledged. This documentation will be provided prior to final PUD approval. e. The minimum City's stormwater main is 15" and must be located a minimum of 5 feet from a sanitary sewer main,this must be addressed prior to preliminary PUD approval. Acknowledged. Design and submittal of off-site public infrastructure is forthcoming. f. The applicant must demonstrate that the existing stormwater system in Wallace Aveune has sufficient capacity to accept the flow from the new main in East Aspen, prior to final PUD approval. Acknowledged. 9. UDC Section 38.410.130.A states: Prior to a final approval of all development reviewed as a site plan,conditional use permit,planned unit development,or subdivision and prior to an annexation of any land,one of the following must occur: Payment must be made to the city of a payment-in-lieu of water rights,calculated based on the annual demand for volume of water the development will require multiplied by the most current annual unit price; a. The applicant must pay cash-in-lieu of water rights prior to final PUD approval. Acknowledged. We have been coordinating cash-in-lieu payment with Brian Heaston. 10. UDC Section 38.430.070.A..:Applications for phased planned unit developments. If a planned unit development is intended to be developed over time in two or more separate phases,application for approval of a phased planned unit development must follow procedures established for pre-application review as outlined in this division 38.430.After pre-application review is completed,phased PUDs may be proposed in accordance with one of the following procedures: a. The proposed phasing plan does not provide sufficient information to determine is the each phase meets UDC.The applicant must clarify when the onsite infrastructure will be constructed including stormwater,trash/recycling facilities,pedestrian access,emergency service access,etc.The applicant should reference advisory comment No. 1 At this time,our intent is to permit the build-out of the PUD as one site plan (SP1) application rather than a master site plan(MSP) application. 11. If not already filed for the subject site,the applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Street improvements to North Wallace Avenue including paving,curb/gutter, sidewalk,and storm drainage Acknowledged b. Street improvements to East Tamarack Street including paving,curb/gutter, sidewalk,and storm drainage Acknowledged 0 • c. Street improvements to East Peach Street including paving,curb/gutter,sidewalk, and storm drainage Acknowledged d. Street improvements to Front Street including paving, curb/gutter,sidewalk,and storm drainage Acknowledged e. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Tamarack Street Acknowledged f. Intersection improvements to North Wallace Avenue and East Peach Street Acknowledged The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to final PUD approval. Acknowledged CONDITION(S)OF APPROVAL: 12. The intersection of East Aspen Street and the Front Street and Ida Street and Front Street must be reconfigured to meet the City's intersection standards.The intersection must be improved with the first phase of development.Any changes to the City Park at the intersection will require the approval from the Parks Department prior to final PUD approval. Based on various conversations with personnel within the Engineering,Planning, Parks,and Economic Development departments(as well as with stakeholders within the neighborhood and project vicinity),we have proposed a configuration that improves the curve along Ida Avenue,turning into Front Street as well as parking facilities to serve the boulder park patrons with leasable parking stalls within the Front Street public ROW. ADVISORY COMMENTS: 1. Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions,streets,and storm water improvements,prepared and signed by a professional engineer(PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer.Water and sewer plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality.The applicant shall also provide professional engineering services for construction inspection,post- construction certification,and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. Building permits will not be issued prior to City acceptance of the infrastructure improvements unless all provisions set forth in Section 38.270.030.0 of the Bozeman Municipal Code are met to allow for concurrent construction. The need to coordinate concurrent construction of the public infrastructure improvements and other off-site improvements and the on-site construction of proposed buildings and appurtenant site improvements is acknowledged. The Developer acknowledges the need to comply with exceptions specified in subsection D of the UDC section 38.270.030 for planned unit developments. Therein,it notes that"a building permit may be allowed prior to completion of the public infrastructure,provided that[criteria#1-13] are met..." These criteria are listed below for ease of reference: 1.The subject property must be developed under the provisions of division 38.430 of this chapter; 2.The subdivider or other developer must enter into an improvements agreement to ensure the installation of required infrastructure and other applicable improvements,to be secured by a financial guarantee in an amount to be determined by the city,with said guarantee to be in the name of the city; 3.Approval of the final engineering design,including location and grade,for the infrastructure project must be obtained from the engineering department,and the state department of environmental quality when applicable, prior to issuance of any building permit for the development; 4.Building permits may be issued incrementally,dependent upon the status of installation of the infrastructure improvements.All building construction within the PUD must cease until required phases of infrastructure improvements as described in the PUD have been completed,and inspected and accepted by the city; S. The subdivider must provide and maintain fire hazard and liability insurance which must name the city as an additional insured and such issuance must not be cancelled without at least 45 days prior notice to the city.The subdivider must furnish evidence,satisfactory to the city,of all such policies and the effective dates thereof, 6.The subdivider must recognize,acknowledge and assume the increased risk of loss because certain public services do not exist at the site; 7.The subdivider must enter into an agreement with the city which provides for predetermined infrastructure funding options; 8.No occupancy of any structures or commencement of any use constructed or proposed within the boundaries of the PUD will be allowed until required infrastructure improvements have been completed,and inspected and accepted by the city,and a certificate of occupancy has been issued; a.No occupancy of structures or commencement of any use must occur when such action would constitute a safety hazard in the opinion of the city; 9.The subdivider must enter into an agreement with the city to address the provision of any services on an interim basis during construction,if deemed appropriate; 10.The subdivider must execute a hold harmless and indemnification agreement indemnifying,defending and holding harmless the city,its employees,agents and assigns from and against any and all liabilities,loss,claims, causes of action,judgments and damages resulting from or arising out of the issuance of a building permit under this section; 11.The subdivider must pay for any extraordinary costs associated with the project which the city may identify, including,but not limited to,additional staff hours to oversee the planning,engineering and construction of the project and infrastructure improvements,inspection of the infrastructure improvements and any extraordinary administrative costs; 12.The development must be under the control of a single developer and all work must be under the supervision of a single general contractor.The developer and general contractor must agree that there must be no third-party builders until required infrastructure improvements have been completed,and inspected and accepted by the city; and 13.Subsequent to preliminary plat or plan approval,a concurrent construction plan,addressing all requirements of this section,must be submitted for review and approval of the review authority with a recommendation from the development review committee. r) r 1 'a 1; Oper: PROFCAgI Type: EP Drawer: 1 Date: 10/31/18 01 Tzipt no: 65006 Year",. limber Amount I 2018 ' 516 PZ ' " PLANING &ZONING $19577.86 COTTONaDOD AND IDA PUDP Tender detail Cif Clt( 14312 $19677.86 Total tendered $19577.86 Total partnent $19677.85 Trans date: 10/31/18 Time: 12:49:2B i Tw YOU! BOZIEMtwo 0 Al Community Development DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION o ROJECTIMAG_E o r PROJECT INFORMATION VICINITY MAP_ Project name: Cottonwood and Ida T Project type(s): Planned Unit Development/Site Plan Description: Mixed Use project with a broad range of housing units and commercial office/artist spaces Street address: 615 East Cottonwood Street&720 N Ida Ave Zip code: 59715 Zoning: NEHMU Gross lot area: 90,013 SF l' , . u Block frontage: 300 LF Cottonwood, 300 LF Ida, 300 LF Aspen � • - --� , LLL Number of buildings: six ` IN Type and Number of dwellings: 92 t! '`i'"' Ct,� Non-residential building size(s):30,000 SF Non-residential building height(s): 3 stories i `-} ?`_'. 18 ' 120 (in stories) OCT 3 w ' f : Number of parking spaces: 201 -'•-_.. .,,,,,"„�, . ,��•� Yes DEPARI MENT OF � I Affordable housing(YEN): COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN(� Cash in lieu of parkland(Y/N): Yes 1 i CITY USE ONLY Q Submittal date: Planner: { J Application file number: j—5' DRC required(Y/N): Revision Date: Development Review Application Al Page 1 of 3 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type,PLS * DEVELOPMENT RE9I EW APPLICATION 1. PROPERTYOWNER Name: Bangtail Partners LLC Full address(with zip code): PO Box 10195, Palo Alto CA 94303-0995 Phone: 406-587-3628 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com 2. APPLICANT Name: Imperial Development LLC Full address(with zip code): 33 N Black Ave Bozeman,MT 59715 Phone: 406-587-3628 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com 3. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Thinktank Design Group Inc(Erik Nelson) Full address(with zip code): 33 N Black Ave,Bozeman,MT 59715 Phone: 406-587-3628 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com 4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Overlay District: ❑x Neighborhood Conservation ❑ None Urban Renewal District: ❑Downtown ❑ North 7th Avenue ❑x Northeast ❑North Park ❑None 5. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if different)for all application types before the submittal will be accepted.The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s)only. As indicated by the signature(s)below,the applicant(s)and property owner(s)submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative's access to the subject site during the course of the review process(Section 38.34.050, BMC). I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Certification of Completion and Compliance—I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan—I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. continued on next page Development Review Application Al Page 2 of 3 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type,PLS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Signatu Printed Name: ��lK- oN Owner Signature: ,�j Printed Name: G re*dC)r Y !'v 14 Owner Signature: Printed Name: If signing as a corporation or LLC,please provide the title and position of the individual signing on behalf of the corporation/LLC. Attach separate sheets for additional owner signatures. 6. APPLICATION TYPES -� Check all that apply,use noted forms. FORM FORM ❑ 1. Pre-application Consultation None ❑ 17. Informal Review INF ❑ 2. Master Site Plan MSP 1118. Zoning Deviation/Departure None ❑ 3. Site Plan SP ❑ 19. Zoning or Subdivision Variance Z/SVAR ❑ 4. Subdivision pre-application PA 1120. Conditional Use Permit CUP ❑ S. Subdivision preliminary plan PP ❑21. Special Temporary Use Permit STUP ❑ 6. Subdivision final plan FP ❑22. Special Use Permit SUP ❑ 7. Subdivision exemption SE 1323. Regulated Activities in Wetlands WR ❑ S. Condominium Review CR 1124. Zone Map Amendment(non-Annexation) ZMA ❑ 9. PUD concept plan PUDC ❑ 25. UDC Text Amendment ZTA 310. PUD preliminary plan PUDP ❑ 26. Growth Policy Amendment GPA ❑ 11. PUD final plan PUDFP 1327. Modification/Plan Amendment MOD ❑ 12. Annexation and Initial Zoning ANNX 1328. Extension of Approved Plan EXT ❑ 13. Administrative Interpretation Appeal AIA 1129. Reasonable Accommodation RA ❑ 14. Administrative Project Decision Appeal APA ❑ 30. Comprehensive Sign Plan CSP ❑ 15. Commercial Non-residential COA CCOA ❑ 16. Historic Neighborhood NCOA 1131. Other: Conservation Overlay COA CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406.582.2260 20 East Olive Street 59715(FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406.582.2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Development Review Application Al �r Page 3 of 3 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type,PLS BOZ E MAN MT 01 Community Development PUDP PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIRED MATERIALS APPLICATION SETS 3 total sets are required that include 1 copy of every item below bound or folded into 81h x 11 or 81h x 14 sets. ® Complete and signed development review application form Al. ® Complete materials required by the SP1 checklist. ® Materials and plans that include all the required items listed in the preliminary PUD plan checklist below. Standard application sets 2 sets that include full size 1 set that include 11 x 17 inch plans required plan sizes: 24 x 36 inch plans ❑x 2-digital versions of all materials (JPEG or PDF) on separate CD-ROM's or USB drives. Individual files must be provided at 5MB or less in size. Files shall be named according to naming protocol. All plans must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81h x 11 inches or larger than 24 x 36 Notes: inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Plans that are rolled or not bound into sets will not be accepted. NOTICING MATERIALS ® Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form Nland materials APPLICATION FEE [� Base fee $1,666 If includes dwellings add: $94 per dwelling unit If includes nonresidential uses add: $292 per 1000 i square feet of nonresident g g pial gross building space. n PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST A Planned United Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan review is the second step in the PUD entitlement process. When a subdivision is proposed in conjunction with a zoning PUD the subdivision review shall be coordinated with the zoning review and a subdivision preliminary plat application shall also be submitted concurrent with this application. 1• Overall project narrative providing a thorough and extensive description of the overall project including design intent, project goals, project timeframe, proposed uses, site improvements and buildings. 2• A complete list of proposed relaxations to the BMC listed by individual section and reason for the relaxation. 3. Name, mailing address and full contact information for project team including: owner, developer, architect, civil engineer, landscape architect/designer and electrical engineer. 4• A title report for subdivision or proposed subdivision guarantee with all current property ownership. 5. Data regarding site conditions, land characteristics, available community facilities and utilities and other related general information about proposed uses, adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land both existing and proposed.This shall be in narrative and/or table formats.Provide the following supporting maps: existing land use map,community plan land use Planned unit Development Preliminary PUDP I Page 1 of 3 Revision Date 01-26-18 Required Forms: I Al, SP1 I Recommended Forms: designation map, city zoning map, neighborhood and entryway overlay map for property showing conditions within 200 feet of the project boundaries. 6. Overall land use ratios for: a. existing footprints of existing buildings and structures b. proposed buildings and structures c. driveways and parking areas d. streets, roads and alleys with areas of rights of way identified separately e. private open spaces for residential uses f. landscape areas g. city parkland 7. Overall project floor area ratio (FAR) and net residential density. 8. Development Schedule. If phasing is proposed, provide narrative clearly describing project phasing with the proposed phasing of all infrastructure, buildings, driveways and parking and landscaping. 9. Phasing Plan exhibit clearly showing all site and infrastructure improvement with phase boundaries including detailed limits of construction and approaches to mitigate any conflicts with phase boundaries and site safety and function. 10. Phasing table that shows phase area and data for each phase including: area in acres and square feet, lot area in acres and square feet, building foot print square feet, building floor area, FAR, street right of way, common opens space, landscaped area, PUD open space square feet and percentage of total, PUD performance points by type and parking space requirements. 11. Table of proposed buildings include phase information, footprint, gross square footage, stories, whether building is existing or proposed, and building use designations by building floor. 12. Colored aerial vicinity map within one-half mile of the site with project site and other significant community facilities, streets, trails, watercourses, railways, highways and other applicable features identified by name. 13. Overall site illustration in color showing all building foot prints, landscaped areas, site circulation including vehicular, bike, and pedestrian facilities. 14. Statements of objectives and conformance to city policy and plans: a.Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Community Plan, provide specific land use goals and objectives in the Community Plan that are furthered by the proposed PUD; b. Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD; c. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and industrial uses; d. Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; e.The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 38.20.090.E, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; f. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated; g. Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g. - home/business, utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling). 15. If not provided by subdivision application materials, physiographic data and summaries for: landforms and geology and soils; hydrology;vegetation; noxious weeds; wildlife and viewsheds. If the project is a brown field site, provide site history, data and copies of any environmental site Planned Unit Development Preliminary PUDP I Page 2 of 3 Revision Date 01-26-18 Required Forms: Al, SP1 Recommended Forms: assessments that have been completed. An approved noxious weed management plan must be submitted. 16. Narrative descriptions of site access and overall utilities including an overview, parking, existing and proposed condition of the streets providing access to the site, proposed accesses to the site and utilities including water, sewer, storm drainage, solid waste, gas, electric and shallow franchise facilities. 17. Development and Design Guidelines per Section 38.20.070.D.2 BMC. 18. Comprehensive Signage Plan, if applicable. CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406-582-2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Planned Unit Development Preliminary PUDP Page 3 of 3 Revision Date 01-26-18 Required Forms: I Al, SP1 Recommended Forms: A SP1 BOZEMAN Community Development SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS ALL INFORMATION AND ITEMS BELOW MUST BE ON SITE PLAN SHEETS AND NOT PRESENTED ON SEPARATE ATTACHMENTS EXCEPT 1, 47, 77, 78, 79, 82, 83 AND STORMWATER, SEWER, WATER AND WETLAND REPORTS, IF PROVIDED. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project narrative describing the project type,proposed use scope,size(dwellings,building size(s),building height(s),number of ❑X buildings,number of total parking spaces)intent,and phasing,if applicable.The narrative must include a response to the City's conceptual review comments. 2. Name of project/development. XD 3. Name and mailing address of developer and owner. ❑X 4. Name and mailing address of engineer,architect,landscape architect,planner,etc. ❑X 5. Location of project/development by street address/legal description. QX 6. Location/vicinity map,including area within one-half mile of the site. ❑X 7. A construction route map showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site. ❑X 8. Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage of the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures. QX b. Driveway circulation and parking areas. ❑X c. Landscaped areas. ❑X d. Private open space,provide boundary/ies and dimensions of each space provided(if residential requirement)on plans or Q separate exhibit.Provide a summary total types of dwelling units and total open space required and provided. e. City Parks. ❑X f. Other public lands(school sites,public access greenway corridors,trail corridors). ❑X SITE PLAN GENERAL - 9. Boundary line of property with dimensions. ❑X 10. Date of plan preparation and changes. ❑X 11. North point indicator. x 12. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet. Q 13. Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet. Q 14. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size(floor area ratio,FAR),with a breakdown by land use. Q 15. Total number(with number of bedrooms),type and density per type of dwellings,and total new and gross residential ❑X density and density per residential parcel.The density per parcel must be presented as net residential density per Section 38.700.130 BMC. Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 1 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITE PLAN DETAILS THE LOCATION, IDENTIFICATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE FOLLOWING EXISTING AND PROPOSED DATA, ONSITE AND TO A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET(200 FEET FOR PUD'S)OUTSIDE THE SITE BOUNDARY, EXCLUSIVE OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 16. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determined by the Director. X❑ 17. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning Jurisdiction,within or near QX the development. 18. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site. 0 19. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to major arterial streets where the X❑ distances shall be 200 feet.The full width of the street including curb,gutter,sidewalk,drive approaches,intersections and street lighting must be shown for both sides of the street. 20. Block frontages. 21. On site streets and rights-of-way. Including curb gutter,sidewalks,and street lights. OX 22. Ingress and egress points. ❑X 23. Traffic flow on site. 24. Traffic flow off site. ❑X 25. All parking facilities,including circulation aisles,access drives,covered and uncovered bicycle parking and bicycle rack type Q and detail,compact spaces,ADA accessible spaces and motorcycle parking,on-street parking(delineated by a 24'long under interrupted space(s)directly adjacent to the project site outside of site vision triangles and hydrant locations),number of employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each. 26. Setbacks,building footprint and any proposed encroachments.Any setback or property line encroachments must be clearly ❑X shown and be noted with encroachment type e.g.awning,weather protection,cantilever,lighting,eave,etc. 27. Utilities and utility rights of way and easements existing and proposed,including: a. Electric. ❑X b. Natural Gas. ❑X c. Telephone,cable and similar utilities. OX d. Water. ❑X e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm). OX 28. Surface water,including: a. Ponds,streams and irrigation ditches(include classifications be based upon a determination of the Gallatin Conservation District; XQ note classification of each feature on plans). b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands(include classifications based upon a determination of the Gallatin Conservation District, ❑X Army Corps of Engineers,or Wetland Delineation Report;note classification of each feature on plans). c. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be identified as lying within a 100 year 0 floodplain through additional floodplain delineation,engineering analysis,topographic survey or other objective and factual basis. d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Article. QX 29. Grading and drainage plan,including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality improvement facilities as VN required by the Engineering Division,or in compliance with B.M.C.Section 14 storm drainage ordinance and best management practices manual adopted by the City.All surface stormwater facilities must demonstrate compliance with Section 38.410.080 BMC including providing cross sections for each facility. Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 2 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N 1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 30. All drainageways,streets,arroyos,dry gullies,diversion ditches,spillways,reservoirs,etc.which maybe incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate). ❑X b. The downstream conditions(developed available drainageways,etc.). ❑X c. Any downstream restrictions. ❑X 31. Significant rock outcroppings,slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic features. ❑X 32. Sidewalks,walkways,driveways,crosswalks,loading areas and docks,bikeways,including typical details and ❑X interrelationships with vehicular circulation system,indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict. 33. Provision for handicapped accessibility,including but not limited to,wheelchair ramps,parking spaces,handrails and curb cuts, X❑ including signage and construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance.A certification block must be provided on the plan sheets. 34. Fences,walls,railings and handrails,including typical details. ❑X 35. Permanent trash enclosure and refuse collection areas,including typical details and elevations. ❑X 36. Construction management plan include exterior construction period material staging,spoils location and construction trash Q enclosure location(s).A trash container type must be provided and detailed(40 yard roll off,fenced enclosure,etc.). If spoils storage is proposed a timeline for removal must be provided. 37. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details. XQ 38. Location and extent of snow storage areas. X❑ 39. Location and extent of street vision triangles extended to center of right of way including adjacent street intersections and X❑ all alley and driveway access points. 40. Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees and shrubs having a diameter 0 greater than 2.5 inches,by species. 41. Historic,cultural and archaeological resources,describe and map any designated historic structures or districts, OX and archaeological or cultural sites. 42. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,shared use pathways,trails,etc.within a distance of 200 feet. ❑X PARKLAND AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING 43. If residential,provide the required parkland for the development,including calculations per Section 38.420 BMC(Park and 0 Recreation Requirements)in a table format,see table format in the PLS document. 44. If cash in lieu is proposed,a thorough calculation including the base requirement and any net based upon maximum density, ❑X narrative addressing the findings the City must make to grant cash in lieu,and the appraisal must be provided to make the request per Section 38.420.030 BMC,unless using city valuation. 45. If parkland is proposed a park plan shall be submitted consistent with Section 38.220.060.A.16 BMC. ❑ 46. Source and amount of parkland credit to be used if previously provided. If from a subdivision confirm amount provided and ❑ detailed phase information as required in table format outlined in the PLS document. 47. Describe how the site plan will satisfy any requirements of Section 38.380, BMC(Affordable Housing)which have either been ❑ established for that lot(s)through the subdivision process or if no subdivision has previously occurred are applicable to a site plan.The description shall be of adequate detail to clearly identify those lots and dwellings designated as subject to the section's compliance requirements and to make the obligations placed on the affected lots and dwellings readily understandable. If affordable housing is not being provided place that statement on the site plan sheets with the site data in item 8. 48. If affordable housing is provided,or cash in lieu is proposed use form AH. ❑ Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 3 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N 1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST LIGHTING DETAILS 49. Lighting plan and electrical site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances,traffic areas(both vehicular ❑ and pedestrian),vegetation that might interfere with lighting,and adjacent uses,containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. 50. A photometric lighting plan that contains a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type and extends the photometric ❑ information to the property boundaries and rights of way. For fueling canopies a second photometric plan is required to specifically analyze the light output underneath the drip line of the fuel canopy. 51. Details for all proposed exterior fixtures that are keyed to the fixtures noted in the lighting electrical plan and the photometric ❑ lighting plan.The detail must demonstrate compliance with full cut-off requirements in Section 38.570 BMC and be located on the lighting plan sheets. BUILDING DESIGN AND SIGNAGE 52. Front,rear and side elevations of all buildings,structures,fences and walls with height dimensions and roof pitches. X❑ Show open stairways,exterior lighting,weather protection,awnings and other projections from exterior building walls. Building elevations must include proposed exterior building materials,windows and doors including a color and material palette for all proposed features keyed to the building elevations. 53. Provide transparency calculations for any elevation that faces a street and is a block frontage. Provide minimum and maximum X❑ height of transparency from grade.Provide area of transparency and percentage in relation to total facade. 54. Provide elevations and details of all ground mounted and rooftop mechanical screening. ❑X 55. Floorplans that include all floors and roof plan.Annotate/designate uses for all rooms and areas.Seating/serving area ❑X layout required for all restaurants. 56. Exterior signs if applicable.Include building frontage dimension(s)and maximum sign area calculation,provide sign dimensions ❑X and square footage of each. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for sign area compliance with Section 38.560 BMC(Signs).A sign permit must be obtained from the Building Division prior to erection of any and all signs,addition design guidelines apply for signs within zoning Overlay Districts. LANDSCAPE PLAN A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION UNLESS THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE INFORMATION CAN BE INCLUDED IN A CLEAR AND UNCLUTTERED MANNER ON A SITE PLAN WITH A SCALE WHERE ONE INCH EQUALS 20 FEET.ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ON PLAN SHEETS. 57. Project name,street address,and lot and block description. ❑X 58. Date,scale,north arrow,and the names,addresses,and telephone numbers of both the property owner and the person preparing ❑X the plan. Plan preparer shall be a state registered landscape architect;an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience in the state;or an individual with a degree in a related field(horticulture,botany, plant science,etc.)and at least five years of professional landscape design experience,of which two years have been in the state. 59. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot. ❑X 60. Existing and proposed grade that complies with maximum allowable slope and grade. ❑X 61. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses,required watercourse setbacks,and the location of any 100-year floodplain; ❑X the approximate location of significant drainage features;and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot. 62. Location of all pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters. Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 4 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 63. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage control including proposed ❑X landscaping and seeding as required by Section 38.410.080.1-1 BMC. 64. Location and extent of snow storage areas. 0 65. Location and extent of street vision triangles,extended to the center of right of way. 0 66. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan,including typical symbols, 0 names(common and botanical name),locations,quantities,container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing and identification of drought tolerant and/or native and adapted species.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated. 67. Size of planting at the time of installation and at maturity. ❑X 68. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and loading areas,including ❑X information as to the amount(in square feet)of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces. 69. Street frontage landscaping,including boulevard details and tree grate details as applicable based upon block frontage. 70. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer zones demonstrating compliance with watercourse setback planting plan requirements per Section 38.410.100.A.2.F BMC unless previously provided during subdivision review. 71. Location,height and material of proposed landscape screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated by one foot contours). X❑ 72. An indication of how existing healthy trees(if any)are to be retained and protected from damage during construction. ❑X 73. ' Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water features. 0 74. A description of proposed watering methods including any use of high efficiency irrigation technologies and best practice, ❑X source of irrigation water and estimated amount of water consumption broken down by vegetation type(e.g.turf,shrubs,trees) and total estimated water consumption. 75. Areas to be irrigated and type of proposed irrigation and the irrigation system design plan. ❑X 76. Tabulation of performance points earned by the plan per Section 38.550.060 BMC. 0 STREETS AND TRAFFIC 77. Traffic study.Street,traffic,and access information required in Section 38.220.060.A.12 BMC or that the requirement ❑X is waived in writing by the Engineering Division prior to application submittal. WATER AND WATER RIGHTS 78. Water rights information. If cash in lieu is proposed a cash in lieu of water rights calculation and payment amount certified by the Engineering Division. 79. If water wells are proposed,a letter from the Department of Natural Resources confirming their intent to issue a permit Q or exemption. DEVIATIONS 80. Either through the site plan requirement above or separate exhibit clearly show any proposed deviations related to site ❑ requirements such as yards/setbacks,lot coverage,parking or other applicable standards. 81. Either through the building elevation requirement above or separate exhibit clearly show any proposed deviations related to ❑ building construction such as height,second story additions,or other applicable standards. Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 5 of 6 1 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 82. For deviations in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay a deviation narrative shall be provided stating which Section(s) of the Bozeman Municipal Code are proposed for deviation,to what extent and include a response to the following: a. How the modification is more historically appropriate for the building and site in question and the adjacent properties,as determined ❑ in Section 38.340.050 BMC than would be achieved under a literal enforcement of this chapter(Chapter 38,BMC); b. How the modifications will have minimal adverse effect on abutting properties or the permitted uses thereof;and c. How the modifications will assure the protection of the public health,safety and general welfare. ❑ d. How the requested deviation will encourage restoration and rehabilitation activity that will contribute to the overall historic character of the community. If more than one deviation,a response to the criteria shall be provided for each deviation. DEPARTURES 83. For departures,a departure narrative must be provided stating which Section(s)of the Bozeman Municipal Code are proposed for departure,the scope and extent of the plan proposed for departure and a response to the required departure criteria. If more than one departure,a summary and response to the criteria must be provided for each departure. ' CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406.582.2260 20 East Olive Street 59715(FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406.582.2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 6 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) BOZ E MAN MT Community Development N1 NOTICING MATERIALS Notice is required for certain projects in order for citizens to participate in decision making which affects their interests and provides opportunity to receive information pertinent to an application that would not otherwise be available to the decision maker. SITE PLAN, MASTER SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,VARIANCE, DEVIATION, FIRST MINOR SUBDIVISON AND SIMILAR REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS ✓❑ Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. 0 Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project site,attached to this checklist. ✓❑ Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. MAJOR AND SUBSEQUENT MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS ❑ Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project ❑ site and not physically contiguous (touching a boundary) to the subdivision,attached to this checklist.Clearly label list ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS. ❑ Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners physically contiguous (touching ❑ a boundary) including recorded purchasers under contract for deed to be sent certified mail attached to this checklist. Clearly label list CONTIGUOUS. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and ❑ addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed. ❑ Two sets additional mailing labels with the names and addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed attached. NOTICE Current property owners of record can be found at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office in the Gallatin County Courthouse 311 West Main Street Bozeman, Montana. CERTIFICATION 1, Erik R Nelson,Thinktank Design Group Inc. hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all condominium owners, within 200 feet of the property located at 615Eastcononwood . is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. Erik Nelson W"��°"�`�� � Wie;10410101]0])C6W Signature CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406-582-2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Noticing Materials Page 1 of 1 Revision Date 1-05.16 Required Forms: N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms: PROPOSED PUD POINTS PERFORMANCE POINTS SEC 38.430.090 E.2.7 A minimum of 20 points need to be achieved;we are expecting to achieve between 43 and 62 points. AFFORDABLE HOUSING density calculations would be 16 units) 21 POINTS 50%increase factor=8 Three points for each percent of dwellings to be constructed in Proposed number of dwelling units=92 the residential development which are provided by long term contractual obligation to an affordable housing agency, for a Number of units increased over base density=92-16= period not less than 20 years, with a written plan assuring on- 76 net increase going affordability pricing and eligibility monitoring, and annual Net increase divided by the 50%increase factor= re-certification. points=76/8=9.5 Per UDO 38.700.020 Environmentally contaminated land(does not apply) Affordable housing. Housing for persons earning less than 65 Points reached=4.77(commercial increase)+9.5 percent of the area's annual median income for rental housing (residential increase)=14.27 and 100 percent of the area's annual median income for purchased housing.Further,affordable housing does not require Maximum allowable(1/3) total of 6.67 greater than 33 percent of the household gross annual median DESIGNED TO MEET LEED-ND income for housing. Annual median income is defined by the 15 POINTS Department of Housing and Urban Development The project design is based on LEED ND criteria. We intend on Points achieved = 21 (7 rental units ( 7.6%] will be provided at keeping the design to this standard and hope to achieve these rental rates at a maximum of 65%AMI points. The project has been registered and certified under ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE D1-L U current LEED version 4.The project is on track to achieve LEED 9.37 POINTS Neighborhood Development Plan certification and possibly LEED Silver.See the LEED information provided in the appendix for the One and '/c point for each percentage of the project area that is certification requirements and a breakdown of the LEED points provided as publicly accessible open space. Project land area = expected to be achieved. 90,000 sf Publicly accessible plaza area = 6750 sf/7.5% of the project total.See Sheet AS.102 Land Dedication Table.These are INCLUSION OF LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN the public plazas indicated as Aspen Yard and Mill Yard. 6 POINTS UNDERUTILIZED AND BROWNFIELD SITES The use of low impact development standards is a project goal 6.67 POINTS and we hope to achieve these points by treating on-site storm water exceeding chapter 40 requirements, incorporating a The site is 2 acres and the south acre previously had a scale integrated snow storage management plan,select plant species hobby train located on the site. The north half of the site has that meet drought tolerant standards,inclusion of weather based been occupied by an industrial warehouse. Accounting for the irrigation systems and limit the amount and type of sod. underutilized south portion a minimum of one point will be achieved. Per(d) BUILDING HEIGHTS p PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED ARE p ENHANCED STREETSCAPE Underutilized and brownfield sites.One point for each 50 percent AVERAGE ROOF increase in the total square footage of commercial and/or HEIGHT ABOVE THE * WAYFINDING FEATURES industrial floor area on underutilized sites; one point for each PARKING GARAGE RECYCLING STATION 50 percent increase in the total number of dwelling units on underutilized sites; one point for each acre developed of the environmentally contaminated land; up to a total of one-third of j the performance points required to be earned. Existing industrial/commercial floor area= 10,488 �i 48' SF 49' ` 50%increase factor=5.244 SF 31' Proposed commercial floor area=35,521 SF 35' ] Amount of increased SF=35,521 -10,488=25,033 SF 46' Number of 50%increase factors/points=25,033/ 10 % F 5.244=4.77 One point for each 50%increase in total=4.77 �. 5 t \% Existing number of dwelling units=0(using base COTTONWOOD ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 page 44 1 � no 3) gjMTg MOO D D AVIBRANT DIVERSE ATlA1NABLECOMMUNITI'1NTHECOREOFTHENORTHEASTERNNEIGHBORHQOD ................ MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 11 BOZEMAN, MT t`! . r �'`I j , °.,.,gyp. 4•■rr.l ��R v`. r � +� • ,� .. _ ' • DESIGN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTICN 1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION page 3 1 53 INTRODUCTION STATEMENT 1 O1 SITE VICINITY MAP& DIAGRAM 1 Q FRCPOSED USES&COMPILED DATA 1 03 FRCJECT TEAM Lila CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP SECTION 2 APPLICATION FORMS&CHECKLISTS page 13 2 O] DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS 201 FUCP CHECKLIST 2.02 SP1 CHECKLIST SECTICN.3 PROJECT OVERVIEW page 36 3 O] FRCJECT OVERVIEW&GOALS 301 EXISTING CONDITIONS& HISTORY 3,02 SITE ZONING& LAND USES 3:03 GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION 3.05 FRCPOSED PUD POINTS 3.03 PRGPOSED RELAXATIONS 3.05 ALICNMENT OF GOALS WITH DISTRICT PLANS AND VISICN NE GOALS 3.07 FUC COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES 3.08 PROPOSED OWNERSHIP 3.09 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES FOR BUSINESSES, RES'ONSIBILITY FOR IMPACT MITIGATION& DESIGN METHODS T--FEDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION 3A RAT;ONALE FOR CHOICES MADE BY THE APPLICANT 3."1 GENERAL SITE DATA SECTION 4 LAND USE page 64 4.00 CITYLAND USE POLICIES&OBJECTIVES ACHIEVED 4.01 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION 4.02 ALIGNMENT OF GOALS WITH NORTHEAST URBAN RENEWA_PLAN 4.C3 ALIGNMENT OF GOALS FROM VISION NE/RUDAT REPOR- SECTION 5 INFRASTRUCTURE page 70 5.f!0 INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES&SUMMARIES 5.01 WATER RIGHTS&CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN SECTION 6 BUILDING&DESIGN page 77 6.00 BUILDING DESIGN OBJECTIVES 6.0 BUILDING STRATEGIES 6.{2 BUILDING MATERIALS 6.0 DES GN VIGNETTES SECTION 7 SIGNAGE page 84 7.00 GOtvPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN SECTION 8 APPENDICES page 90 COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL 11 11 JANUARY 2019 SECTION 1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 1.00 INTRODUCTION STATEMENT 1.31 SITE VICINITY MAP & DIAGRAM 1.32 PROPOSED USES & COMPILED DATA 1.03 PROJECT TEAM 1.04 CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP COTTONWOOD ¢ IDS, RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 3 1t EXCERPT FROM THE NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD R/UDAT REPORT "Today,the Northeast Neighborhood is strategically located and can support the housing shortage,and teve-age existing infrastructure,encouraging a contemporary form of multimcdal transportation due its proximity to downtown,the university and access to adjacent natural amenities.The question will be how the Northeast Neighborhood can be strategic withoLt destroying its character and the attributes that make it unique. The chat_enge will be.accommodating new housing and commercial development with appropriate policies and design standards to maintain the integrity and quality of life for residents and business owners in the existing area.Design must also honor the past and the historical significance of the location.New policies should regulate new construction so that it fits within the neighborhood and focuses on quality context-sensitive design. As Bozeman continues to grow,a focus on great public spaces,walkability,and opportunities to ca-er to active lifestyles will continue to enhance Bozeman as a place and reinforce its great quality of life and economy of choice for knowledged workers and talented professiona.s. One fear of additiora.development in the Northeast Neighborhood is gentrification of the area anc increasec values in an already price sensitive market.The City should explore a regional:policy to make housing more attainable to the region as a whole.However, certain cevelopment;could implement a portion of housing that is below market rates in exchange for other concessions.For example,public property could be made available to those developers that conscientiously address some levels of affordable housing. Design shculd be u-iigue and reflect the existing character distinguishable from other parts of:he neighborhood." _he Cottonwood anG Ida Neighborhood Development addresses these challenges by providing nevv housing at reasonable prices,while maintaining the integrity of the existing community - honoring the past and accommodating the future. 0 • INTRODUCTION) STATENEWT The site is in t-)e N_,--heast par of B>>eman and carries a Ile unique Xx unique zoning desiaiation found only in this part cf town the Nortreast Historic Mixed-lJ=_e District INEHMUI• The r� , Unified Derelooment Code IUBC) describes this District as * • s follows, The intent of the Northeas: His-oric Mixed Use District is to reco provide ni-ion of an a-ea that has P 9 devel:)?ed with a alend of uses not commonly seen IN • • under typical zoning requ►ramerts. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a p. -• ,�,` place of'ering additional oppertun ties for creative id..:: i. integration of land uses." This project propose= an integration cf a broad ra-)ge of 4 housing a-id comr-ercial activ tv along with thoughtful public plaza spaces to connect to the existing fabric of the neighborhood. The project will exceec _EED Neighborhood Design Stardards, i7icorporate low impact development approaches, and -rost impor-antly provide affordable PROJECT SITE housing options. I _,_ _�_,� is ... :�:' •1 ,+. � � - Iry tn eLDG 1 BLDG 24-1 r Masco AL L BL DG BLDG d RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 5 '•1 l l I r - % � �r 1 • _ •'i' L 1 I I• 1 1 111 S•� I � -_}= , •. III � ..�,,�, . led 11.. "- ?+ _at Ar 1 � 1• 1 1 111 1 1+ If 7 T LII le) INTRODUCTION STATEMENT CONTINUED r4 r DILL C-.� r _ _YJF AERIAL VIEW A APARTMENT- 10%AFFORDABLE E EXISTING REHABILITATED BUILDING FOR CAFE USE-OPEN PAVILLION B TOWNHOUSE STYLE APARTMENTS-SALE CONDOS F OFFICE BUILDING C GROUND FLOOR-ARTISAN MANUFACTURING G OFF-SITE PARKING -SALE CONDOS H PUBLIC PLAZA D SECOND-THIRD FLOOR RESIDENTIAL LOFTS -SALE CONDOS C0770mt9®®® ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 7 11 �► i • i 1� � � i • i ►1 7 . ``ter _ w .. C • i` ,- j E OAK ST ENO 'BIRCHSF ` ,r ��" yy�/ ► y '� �5;: IL �, � -,•. t"';r•� �' � 1 ;,ICE•�, `�`. 1 • . _� F _ � #!`�:-v r� :,1 r � �•, • poi; •max �' .1, E;TAMARACKtST •per, ;• ;,�jy1' E .•r 90 ;. .. •s rtrIllb IP m .• _ E'COTTO 5 l .ni!l •.-r. r.' .i• M t• a 1p t�jJ' . , -, i . , r, '1 �t�';,•A awl. ~:' '� �a-1tVJ �•`� +�*�'•'1 lj`',.\ ` t 1r♦ �\R { y%i►� ~�... � � � � •3 �['� :��!I � '� •.���� F`IDLEY 5�����„�i5�• :� ,`'• "�.t ti?►�.� f - 5• �•t - tti .:i ti► ,:t,`•' �=t j DAVIS'STo •'9v 'ST , • f t < .• yam: 7.:=] } ff ', Y.?):! tr+�,+■�t� { r y( �.�. .. \ , - - - • Al l+ a .+y�'� ;. .1• 6 -'^N/• a • .Z -• f . .."• i _a r♦ • .*� iw I .f•' Ji•i 1• ..M1.{�:. _• 1.'•1Q�;,. •, ��� - C - - t • ` • E L'AMMEiST DENH/CII:ST ._ Cho PROPOSED USES A APARTMENT- 10%AFFOREAELE B TOWNHOUSE STYLE APARTMENTS - SALE CONDOS C GROUND FLOOR -ARTISAN MANUFACTURING - SALE coNDos D SECOND - THIRD FLOOR H RESIDENTIAL LOFTS - SALE ,\, . I A CONDOS E EXISTING REHABILITATED \c BUILDING FOR CAFE USE - OPEN PAVILLIOPJ a ,a/ F OFFICE BUILDING ✓ �. G OFF-SITE PARKING H PUBLIC PLAZA COMPILED DATA a miom BLDG 1 RESIDES TIAL 40.072 GSF 34,061 SF 11,631 SF 46 UNITS BLDG 2 RESIDENTIAL 10,791 GSF 9.172 SF 3,558 SF 18 UNITS BLDG 3 RESIDENTIAL 15,908 GSF 13,522 SF 5,192 SF 12 UNITS BLDG 4 REEIDENTIAL 26,645 GSF 22,648 SF 8,359 SF 16 UNITS ;AFTISAN BLDG 5 RESTAURANT/ 2,156 GSF 1,833 SF 2,156 SF COMM-:RCIAL BLDG 6 CF=ICE/ 29,650 GSF 25,203 SF 9,538 SF CONMER'IAL PUBLIC PLAZA 6,750 SF OPENSPACE 11,650 SF RESIDENTIAL PARKING UNDEF'3POUND 39,395 GSF 33,486 SF 36.998 SF 96 SPACES GARAGE TOTAL PROJECT PARKING 200 SPACES TOTAL BUILDING SF 125,216 GSF 106,434 SF 39,422 SF TOTAL SITE SF 90,013 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO(F.A.R.I 1.4 COTT'OMWOOD ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 9 PROJECT TEAM OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER Bangtail Partners LLC. Sanderson Stewart 1189 Tennessee Street,Urit 103 Contact:Mike Russell San Francisco,CA 94107 10t.East Eabcock Street Bo:en-an,MT 55715 DEVELOPER 855-654-5255 Imperial Development,Ltc. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Contact:Jon Evans 33 North Black Ave. Ni=_hkia--Monks Bozeman,MT 59715 Contact:Tf Mons 406-451-1470 10E WEEi Bar-ock S reet Bo:errtn,MT 59713 40E-587--9901 ARCHITECTS Tm3nk3,al`Ilsl-klar.-)m Openscope Studio,Inc. Contact:Ian Dunn/Mark Hogan MEP ENGINEER 1776 18th Street Emera d City Engineers,Inc. San Francisco,CA 94107 415-891-0954 Contact Aram French,P.E. 21705 High vay 99 IandunnfdOpenscopestudic.cDm Mointlake Terra:e,WA 98043 MarkhoganfdOpenscopestudio.com 425-741-1200 ThinkTank Design Group ACOUSTICAL Contact:Erik Nelson/Brian Caldwell. 33 North Black Ave. Charles M.Salter Associate_,Inc. Bozeman,MT 59715 Cortac: E[han Sate-, PE,LEED AP 406-587-3628 130 Sutter Street,Floor 5 Sar Francisco,CA 5t 104 Fernau& Hartman Archite--ts 415-39°-0442 Contact: Richard Fernau,FAIA 506 Mites Stree. BUILDING ENVELOPE Clyde Park,MT 59018 406-686-9193 Simpscr Gunpe-tz&Heger Cortaa:Gregory Doelp GENERAL CONTRACT OP, 100 Pine Sweet,Suite 1600 San Franci-sco,CA 9011 Langlas&Associates 415-495-3700 Contact:Loren Cantrell 1019 East Main,Ste 101 LEED iSUSTAINABIL.ITY Bozeman,MT 59715 406-585-3420 Kat i W L a—IS+Associates Contact: �atl- JVi.lians LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PO Bo: 191 Bozema-i, WT 59771 Fletcher Studio 406.58t-3175 Contact:David Fletcher KathfdKE,hen.hams.com 2325 3rd Street,#413 San Francisco,CA 94107 415-431-7878 DftetcherfdFtetcherstudio.con COTTOMWOO® ¢ H®A RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 10 CHICAGO TITLE • INSURANCE COMPANY Policy No. : 7170-1-1-109058-2018.72156-215267676 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, herein called the Company, guarantees the Assured against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY THE LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS AND THE SPECIFIC ASSURANCES AFFORDED BY THIS GUARANTEE. IF YOU WISH ADDITIONAL LIABILITY, OR ASSURANCES OTHER THAN AS CONTAINED HEREIN, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMPANY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AS TO THE AVAILABILITY AND COST. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Countersigned: {� ► k- By. By: a� Authorized Officer or Agent u' Bradley C. Stratton American Land Title Company of Montana 1800 W Koch St President Bozeman, MT 59715 Tel:406-587-5563 Fax:406-587-8038 Attest: Secretary Note: This endorsement shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized signatory. 72156 72156 Miscellaneous Guarantee Face Page 00_156 Page i of 1 SCHEDULE A Policy Number: 7170-1-1-109058-2018.;211 6-215267676 Order No. 1-109058 (Bangtail Partners,LLC) Liability: $200.00 Fee: $160.00 Dated: October 17,2018 at 8:00 A.M. Assured: The County of Gallatin and in the City of Bozeman in Montana. The assurances referred to on the face page are: That, according to those public records which,under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters relative to the following described real property: Parcel A: Lots 5 through 16, inclusive, all in Brock 105 of The Norther: Pacific Addition to The City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Together with the vacated alley,adjacent and contiguous thereto,pursuant to Ordinance No 628,recorded July 29, 199' in film 117,page 1328„according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County,Montana. [Plat No. C-23] Parcel B: Lots 17 through 28,Inclusive, all in Block 105 of The Northern Facific Addition to the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County,Montana Together with the vacated alley adjacent and contiguous thereto,pursuant to Ordinance No. 628,recorded July 29, 1991 iiI Film 117,page 1328, according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in ftl-cff ce of the County Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County,Mo:itar-a. [Plat No. C-23] Title to said real property is vested in: Bangtail Partners,LLC, a California limited liabililty company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions,which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 • • SECTION 2 APPLICATION FORMS AND CHECKLISTS 2:00 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW!APPLICATIONS Al APPLICATION PUDP APPLICATION SP1 APPLICATION N1 APPLICATION 2.01 PUDP CHECKLIST 2.02 SP1 CHECKLIST r,oY OC`lUDOD ¢ l©Q RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 13 BOZ E MAN MT • • Al Community Development DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT IMAGE PROJECT INFORMATION 1 VICINITY MAP Project name: Cottonwood and Ida^ Project type(s): Planned Unit Development/Site Plan Description: Mixed Use project with a broad range of housing units and commercial office/artist spaces Street address: 615 East Cottonwood Street&720 N Ida Ave Zip code: 59715 _ __ Zoning: NEHMU Gross lot area: 90,013 SF_ I Block frontage: Cottonwood:Mixed,Ida: Mixed,Aspen:Mixed Number of buildings: six Type and Number of dwellings: 92 i i Non-residential building size(s): 30,000 SF Non-residential building height(s): 3 stories (in stories) Number of parking spaces:200 Affordabl=housing(Y/N): Yes Cash in lieu of parkland(Y/N): Yes I J1AN 28 2019 CITY USE ONLY J " � Submittal date: Planner: COMMA NI Application file nimber: DRC required(Y/N): Revision Date: Develop went Review Application Al Page 1 of 3 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS & EVELOPMENT RE\W-W APPLICATION 1. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Bangtail Partners LLC Full address(with zip code): 1189 Tennessee Street,Unit 103,San Francisco,CA 94107 Phone: 406-587-3628 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com 2. APPLICANT Name: Imperial Development LLC Full address(with zip code): 33 N Black Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 406-587-3628 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com 3. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Thinktank Design Group Inc(Erik Nelson) Full address(with zip code): 33 N Black Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 406-587-3628 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com 4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Overlay District: ❑x Neighborhood Conservation ❑ None Urban Renewal District: ❑ Downtown ❑ North 7th Avenue ❑x Northeast ❑ North Park ❑None 5. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if different)for all application types before the submittal will be accepted.The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s)only. As indicated by the signature(s)below,the applicant(s)and property owner(s)submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative's access to the subject site during the course of the review process(Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our) knowledge. Certification of Completion and Compliance-I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan-I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. continued on next page Development Review Application Al Page 2 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS cl � • Imperialo Development,LLC. Applicant Signatu Printed Name: F �e4—$oN Managing Member Owner Signature: Printed Name: G rQ,j*dc)✓' Av f 6 Bangtail Partners,LLC.,Managing Member Owner Signature: Printed Name: If signing as a corporation or LLC,please provide the title and position of the individual signing on behalf of the corporation/LLC. Attach separate sheets for additional owner signatures. 6. APPLICATION TYPES Check all that apply,use noted forms. FORM FORM ❑ 1. Pre-application Consultation None ❑ 17. Informal Review INF ❑ 2. Master Site Plan MSP ❑ 18. Zoning Deviation/Departure None ❑ 3. Site Plan SIP 1119. Zoning or Subdivision Variance Z/SVAR ❑ 4. Subdivision pre-application PA ❑20. Conditional Use Permit CUP ❑ 5. Subdivision preliminary plan PP ❑21. Special Temporary Use Permit STUP ❑ 6. Subdivision final plan FP 1322. Special Use Permit SUP ❑ 7. Subdivision exemption SE ❑ 23. Regulated Activities in Wetlands WR ❑ S. Condominium Review CR 1124. Zone Map Amendment(non-Annexation) ZMA ❑ 9. PUD concept plan PUDC ❑ 25. UDC Text Amendment ZTA 10. PUD preliminary plan PUDP ❑ 26. Growth wooli=y Amendment GPA ❑ 11. PUD final plan PUDFP 1127. Modification/Plan Amendment MOD ❑ 12. Annexation and Initial Zoning ANNX ❑ 28. Extension o=Approved Plan EXT ❑ 13. Administrative Interpretation Appeal AIA ❑ 29. Reasonable Accommodation RA ❑ 14. Administrative Project Decision Appeal APA ❑ 30. Comprenen3ive Sign Plan CSP ❑ 15. Commercial Non-residential COA CCOA ❑ 16. Historic Neighborhood NCOA 1131, Other: Conservation Overlay COA CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406.582.2260 20 East Olive Street 59715(FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406.582.2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Development Review Application Al T Page 3 of 3 -� Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type,PLS ST BOZEMAN Community Development PUDP PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIRED MATERIALS APPLICATION SETS - 3 total sets are required that include 1 copy of every item below bound or folded into 8Y2 x 11 or 8Y2 x 14 sets. ® Complete and signed development review application form Al. ® Complete materials required by the SP1 checklist. ® Materials and plans that include all the required items listed in the preliminary PUD plan checklist below. Standard application sets 2 sets that include full size 1 set that include 11 x 17 inch plans required plan sizes: 24 x 36 inch plans 0 2-digital versions of all materials (JPEG or PDF) on separate CD-ROM's or USB drives. Individual files must be provided at 5MB or less in size. Files shall be named according to naming protocol. All plans must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8Y2 x 11 inches or larger than 24 x 36 Notes: inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Plans that are rolled or not bound into sets will not be accepted. NOTICING MATERIALS ® Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form Nland materials APPLICATION FEE Base fee $1,666 If includes dwellings add: $94 per dwelling unit If includes nonresidential $292 per 1000 square feet of nonresidential gross building space. uses add: PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST A Planned United Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan review is the second step in the PUD entitlement process. When a subdivision is proposed in conjunction with a zoning PUD the subdivision review shall be coordinated with the zoning review and a subdivision preliminary plat application shall also be submitted concurrent with this application. 1• Overall project narrative providing a thorough and extensive description of the overall project including design intent, project goals, project timeframe, proposed uses, site improvements and buildings. 2• A complete list of proposed relaxations to the BMC listed by individual section and reason for the relaxation. 3. Name, mailing address and full contact information for project team including: owner, developer, architect, civil engineer, landscape architect/designer and electrical engineer. 4• A title report for subdivision or proposed subdivision guarantee with all current property ownership. S. Data regarding site conditions, land characteristics, available community facilities and utilities and other related general information about proposed uses, adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land both existing and proposed.This shall be in narrative and/or table formats. Provide the following supporting maps: existing land use map, community plan land use Planned Unit Development Preliminary PUDP I Page 1 of 3 Revision Date 01-26-18 Required Forms: I Al, SP1 I Recommended Forms: designation map, city zoning map, neighborhood and entryway overlay .nap for property showing conditions within 200 feet of the project boundaries. 6. Overall land use ratios for: a. existing footprints of existing buildings and structures b. proposed buildings and structures c. driveways and parking areas d. streets, roads and alleys with areas of rights of way identified separately e. private open spaces for residential uses f. landscape areas g. city parkland 7. Overall project floor area ratio (FAR) and net residential density. 8. Development Schedule. If phasing is proposed, provide narrative clearly describing project phasing with the proposed phasing of all infrastructure, buildings, driveways and parking and landscaping. 9. Phasing Plan exhibit clearly showing all site and infrastructure irr_prcvement with phase boundaries including detailed limits of construction and approaches to miti;;ate any conflicts with phase boundaries and site safety and function. 10. Phasing table that shows phase area and data for each phase including: area in acres and square feet, lot area in acres and square feet, building foot print square feet, building f.00r area, FAR, street right of way, common opens space, landscaped area, PUD open space squa-e feet and pe-centage of total, PUD performance points by type and parking space requirements. 11. Table of proposed buildings include phase information, fcotpri.nt, gross square footage, stories, whether building is existing or proposed, and building use designations by building floor. 12• Colored aerial vicinity map within one-half mile of the site with project site and other significant community facilities, streets, trails, watercourses, railways, highways and other applicable features identified by name. 13. Overall site illustration in color showing all building foot prints, landscaped areas, site circulation including vehicular, bike, and pedestrian facilities. 14. Statements of objectives and conformance to city policy and plans: a. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Community Plan, provide specific land use goals and objectives in the Community Plan that are furthered by the proposed PUD; b. Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD; c. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and industrial uses; d. Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; e.The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 38.20.090.E, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; f. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being axiaidec. or mitigated; g. Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption:, (e.g. - home/business, utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling). 15. If not provided by subdivision application materials, physic rap-'hic data and summaries for: landforms and geology and soils; hydrology; vegetation; noxious weeds; wildlife and viewsheds. If the project is a brown field site, provide site history, data and copies of any environmental site Planned Unit Development Preliminary PUDP I Page 2 of 3 Revision Date 01-26-18 Required Forms: I Al, SP1 I Recommended Forms: assessments that have been completed. An approved noxious weed management plan must be submitted. 16. Narrative descriptions of site access and overall utilities including an overview, parking, existing and proposed condition of the streets providing access to the site, proposed accesses to the site and utilities including water, sewer, storm drainage, solid waste, gas, electric and shallow franchise facilities. 17. Development and Design Guidelines per Section 38.20.070.D.2 BMC. 18. Comprehensive Signage Plan, if applicable. CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406-582-2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Planned Unit Development Preliminary PUDP Page 3 of 3 Revision Date 01-26-18 Required Forms: Al, SP1 Recommended Forms: MT SP1 BOZ E MAN Community Development SITE PLAN CHECKLIST _ SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS___ �_ ALL INFORMATION AND ITEMS BELOW MUST BE ON SITE PLAN SHEETS AND NOT PRESENTED ON SEPARATE ATTACHMENTS EXCEPT 1, 47, 77, 78, 79, 82, 83 AND STORMWATER, SEWER, WATER AND WETLAND REPORTS, IF PROVIDED. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project narrative describing the project type,proposed use scope,size(dwellings,building size(s),building height(s), number of ❑X buildings,number of total parking spaces)intent,and phasing,if applicable.The narrative must include a response to the City's conceptual review comments. 2. Name of project/development. ❑X 3. Name and mailing address of developer and owner. ❑X 4. Name and mailing address of engineer,architect, landscape architect, planner,etc. ❑X S. Location of project/development by street address/legal description. ❑X 6. Location/vicinity map, including area within one-half mile of the site. QX 7. A construction route map showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site. QX 8. Location, percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage of the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and'structures. ❑X b. Driveway circulation and parking areas. ❑X c. Landscaped areas. ❑X d. Private open space,provide boundary/ies and dimensions of each space provided(if residential requirement)on plans or ❑X separate exhibit.Provide a summary total types of dwelling units and total open space required and provided. e. City Parks. QX f. Other public lands(school sites,public access greenway corridors,trail corridors). ❑X l SITE PLAN GENERAL 9. Boundary line of property with dimensions. 10. Date of plan preparation and changes. ❑X 11. North point indicator. ❑X 12. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet, but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet. ❑X 13. Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet. ❑X 14. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size(floor area ratio, FAR),with a breakdown by land use. ❑X 15. Total number(with number of bedrooms),type and density per type of dwellings,and total new and gross residential ❑X density and density per residential parcel.The density per parcel must be presented as net residential density per Section 38.700.130 BMC. Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 1 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP, N 1,PLS, DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) • SITLOPLAN CHECKLIST SITE PLAN DETAILS THE LOCATION, IDENTIFICATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE FOLLOWING EXISTING AND PROPOSED DATA, ONSITE AND TO A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET(200 FEET FOR PUD'S) OUTSIDE THE SITE BOUNDARY, EXCLUSIVE OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 16. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determined by the Director. ❑X 17. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning Jurisdiction,within or near XO the development. 18. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site. XQ 19. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to major arterial streets where the XO distances shall be 200 feet.The full width of the street including curb,gutter,sidewalk,drive approaches,intersections and street lighting must be shown for both sides of the street. 20. Block frontages. XO 21. On site streets and rights-of-way. Including curb gutter,sidewalks,and street lights. ❑X 22. Ingress and egress points. X❑ 23. Traffic flow on site. OX 24. Traffic flow off site. ❑X 25. All parking facilities, including circulation aisles,access drives,covered and uncovered bicycle parking and bicycle rack type ❑X and detail,compact spaces,ADA accessible spaces and motorcycle parking,on-street parking(delineated by a 24'long under interrupted space(s)directly adjacent to the project site outside of site vision triangles and hydrant locations), number of employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each. 26. Setbacks, building footprint and any proposed encroachments.Any setback or property line encroachments must be clearly ❑X shown and be noted with encroachment type e.g.awning,weather protection,cantilever, lighting,eave,etc. 27. Utilities and utility rights of way and easements existing and proposed,including: a. Electric. ❑X b. Natural Gas. ❑X c. Telephone,cable and similar utilities. ❑X d. Water. ❑X e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm). ❑X 28. Surface water, including: a. Ponds,streams and irrigation ditches(include classifications be based upon a determination of the Gallatin Conservation District; ❑X note classification of each feature on plans). b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands(include classifications based upon a determination of the Gallatin Conservation District, ❑X Army Corps of Engineers,or Wetland Delineation Report;note classification of each feature on plans). c. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be identified as lying within a 100 year ❑X floodplain through additional floodplain delineation,engineering analysis,topographic survey or other objective and factual basis. d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Article. ❑X 29. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality improvement facilities as ❑X required by the Engineering Division,or in compliance with B.M.C.Section 14 storm drainage ordinance and best management practices manual adopted by the City.All surface stormwater facilities must demonstrate compliance with Section 38.410.080 BMC including providing cross sections for each facility. Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 2 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N 1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) 0 SITOPLAN CHECKLIST 30. All drainageways,streets,arroyos,dry gullies,diversion ditches,spillways, reservoirs,etc.which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate). ❑X b. The downstream conditions(developed available drainageways,etc.). ❑X c. Any downstream restrictions. ❑X 31. Significant rock outcroppings,slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic features. ❑X 32. Sidewalks,walkways,driveways,crosswalks, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details and 0 interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict. 33. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to,wheelchair ramps, parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including signage and construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance.A certification block must be provided on the plan sheets. 34. Fences,walls, railings and handrails,including typical details. 35. Permanent trash enclosure and refuse collection areas, including typical details and elevations. ❑X 36. Construction management plan include exterior construction period material staging.spoils location and construction trash ❑X enclosure location(s).A trash container type must be provided and detailed(40 yard roll off,fenced enclosure,etc.). If spoils storage is proposed a timeline for removal must be provided. 37. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details. ❑X 38. Location and extent of snow storage areas. 0 39. Location and extent of street vision triangles extended to center of right of way including adjacent street intersections and 0 all alley and driveway access points. 40. Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs having a diameter ❑X greater than 2.5 inches, by species. 41. Historic,cultural and archaeological resources,describe and map any designated historic structures or districts, 0 and archaeological or cultural sites. 42. Major public facilities, including schools, parks,shared use pathways,trails,etc.within a distance of 200 feet. 0 PARKLAND AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING 43. If residential, provide the required parkland for the development, including calculatio-is per Section 38.420 BMC(Park and 0 Recreation Requirements) in a table format,see table format in the PLS document. 44. If cash in lieu is proposed,a thorough calculation including the base requirement and any net based upon maximum density, LIN narrative addressing the findings the City must make to grant cash in lieu,and the appraisal must be provided to make the request per Section 38.420.030 BMC, unless using city valuation. 45. If parkland is proposed a park plan shall be submitted consistent with Section 38.220.060.A.16 BMC. ❑ 46. Source and amount of parkland credit to be used if previously provided. If from a subdivision confirm arrount provided and ❑ detailed phase information as required in table format outlined in the PLS document. 47. Describe how the site plan will satisfy any requirements of Section 38.380, BMC(Affordable Housing)which have either been ❑ established for that lot(s)through the subdivision process or if no subdivision has previously occurred are applicable to a site plan.The description shay be of adequate detail to clearly identify those lots and dwellings designated as subject to the section's compliance requirements and to make the obligations placed on the.affected lots and dwellings readily understandable. If affordable housing is not being provided place that statement on the site plan sheets with the site data in item 8. 48. If affordable housing is provided,or cash in lieu is proposed use form AH. ,a Zola ElJA ()C, fi,, ;V _ �,, MEN _J Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 3 of 6 '""" Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N1, PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if aFordable housing) SIT.PLAN CHECKLIST LIGHTING DETAILS 49. Lighting plan and electrical site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances,traffic areas(both vehicular ❑ and pedestrian),vegetation that might interfere with lighting,and adjacent uses,containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. 50. A photometric lighting plan that contains a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type and extends the photometric ❑ information to the property boundaries and rights of way. For fueling canopies a second photometric plan is required to specifically analyze the light output underneath the drip line of the fuel canopy. 51. Details for all proposed exterior fixtures that are keyed to the fixtures noted in the lighting electrical plan and the photometric ❑ lighting plan.The detail must demonstrate compliance with full cut-off requirements in Section 38.570 BMC and be located on the lighting plan sheets. BUILDING'DESIGN AND SIGNAGE i 52. Front, rear and side elevations of all buildings,structures,fences and walls with height dimensions and roof pitches. ❑X Show open stairways,exterior lighting,weather protection,awnings and other projections from exterior building walls. Building elevations must include proposed exterior building materials,windows and doors including a color and material palette for all proposed features keyed to the building elevations. 53. Provide transparency calculations for any elevation that faces a street and is a block frontage. Provide minimum and maximum ❑X height of transparency from grade. Provide area of transparency and percentage in relation to total facade. 54. Provide elevations and details of all ground mounted and rooftop mechanical screening. ❑X 55. Floorplans that include all floors and roof plan.Annotate/designate uses for all rooms and areas.Seating/serving area ❑X layout required for all restaurants. 56. Exterior signs if applicable.Include building frontage dimension(s)and maximum sign area calculation,provide sign dimensions and square footage of each. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for sign area compliance with Section 38.560 BMC(Signs).A sign permit must be obtained from the Building Division prior to erection of any and all signs,addition design guidelines apply for signs within zoning Overlay Districts. LANDSCAPE PLAN��� A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION UNLESS THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE INFORMATION CAN BE INCLUDED IN A CLEAR AND UNCLUTTERED MANNER ON A SITE PLAN WITH A SCALE WHERE ONE INCH EQUALS 20 FEET. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ON PLAN SHEETS. 57. Project name,street address,and lot and block description. ❑X 58. Date,scale,north arrow,and the names,addresses,and telephone numbers of both the property owner and the person preparing X❑ the plan. Plan preparer shall be a state registered landscape architect;an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience in the state;or an individual with a degree in a related field(horticulture, botany, plant science,etc.)and at least five years of professional landscape design experience,of which two years have been in the state. 59. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot. ❑X 60. Existing and proposed grade that complies with maximum allowable slope and grade. ❑X 61. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks,and the location of any 100-year floodplain; ❑X the approximate location of significant drainage features;and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot. 62. Location of all pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters. ❑X Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 4 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) 0 SIT PLAN KLI HE T C C S 63. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage control including proposed 0 landscaping and seeding as required by Section 38.410.080.H BMC. 64. Location and extent of snow storage areas. r ❑X 65. Location and extent of street vision triangles,extended to the center of right of way. ❑X 66. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan,including typical symbols, ❑X names(common and botanical name),locations,quantities,container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing and identification of drought tolerant and/or native and adapted species.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated. 67. Size of planting at the time of installation and at maturity. ❑X 68. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and loading areas, including ❑X information as to the amount(in square feet)of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces. 69. Street frontage landscaping,including boulevard details and tree grate details as applicable based upon block frontage. 70. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips, including watercourse buffer zones demonstrating compliance 0 with watercourse setback planting plan requirements per Section 38.410.100.A.2.F BMC unless previously provided during subdivision review. 71. Location, height and material of proposed landscape screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated by one foot contours). ❑X 72. An indication of how existing healthy trees(if any)are to be retained and protected from damage during construction. ❑X 73. Size, height, location and material of proposed seating, lighting, planters,sculptures,and water features. ❑X 74. A description of proposed watering methods including any use of high efficiency irrigation technologies and best practice, ❑X source of irrigation water and estimated amount of water consumption broken down by vegetation type(e.g.turf,shrubs,trees) and total estimated water consumption. 75. Areas to be irrigated and type of proposed irrigation and the irrigation system design plan. ❑X 76. Tabulation of performance points earned by the plan per Section 38.550.060 BMC. ❑X STREETS AND TRAFFIC 77. Traffic study.Street,traffic,and access information required in Section 38.220.060.A.12 BMC or that the requirement ❑X is waived in writing by the Engineering Division prior,to application submittal. WATER AND WATER RIGHTS ] 78. Water rights information. If cash in lieu is proposed a cash in lieu of water rights calculation and payment amount certified by ❑X the Engineering Division. 79. If water wells are proposed,a letter from the Department of Natural Resources confirming their intent to issue a permit ❑X or exemption. r DEVIATIONS -- -- - -- -- -- - - - - - -- - -- --- - -- 80. Either through the site plan requirement above or separate exhibit clearly show any proposed deviations related to site ❑ requirements such as yards/setbacks, lot coverage, parking or other applicable standards. 81. Either through the building elevation requirement above or separate exhibit clearly show any proposed deviations related to ❑ building construction such as height,second story additions,or other applicable standards. Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 5 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N1,PLS, DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) 0 " . SITOPLAN CHECKLIST 82. For deviations in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay a deviation narrative shall be provided stating which Section(s) of the Bozeman Municipal Code are proposed for deviation,to what extent and include a response to the following: a. How the modification is more historically appropriate for the building and site in question and the adjacent properties,as determined in Section 38.340.050 BMC than would be achieved under a literal enforcement of this chapter(Chapter 38, BMC); b. How the modifications will have minimal adverse effect on abutting properties or the permitted uses thereof;and c. How the modifications will assure the protection of the public health,safety and general welfare. ❑ d. How the requested deviation will encourage restoration and rehabilitation activity that will contribute to the overall historic character of the community. If more than one deviation,a response to the criteria shall be provided for each deviation. DEPARTURES 83. For departures,a departure narrative must be provided stating which Section(s)of the Bozeman Municipal Code are proposed for departure,the scope and extent of the plan proposed for departure and a response to the required departure criteria. If more than one departure,a summary and response to the criteria must be provided for each departure. r CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406.582.2260 20 East Olive Street 59715(FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406.582.2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Site Plan Checklist SP1 Page 6 of 6 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Al,SP,N 1,PLS,DEM(if demolition),WR(if wetlands),AH(if affordable housing) I T • BOZ E MAN Community Development N1 NOTICING MATERIALS Notice is required for certain projects in order for citizens to participate in decision making which affects their interests and provides opportunity to receive information pertinent to an application that would not otherwise be available to the decision maker. SITE PLAN, MASTER SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE, DEVIATION, FIRST MINOR SUBDIVISON AND SIMILAR REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS ✓❑ Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. ✓❑ Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project site,attached to this checklist. ✓❑ Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. MAJOR AND SUBSEQUENT MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS ❑ Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project ❑ site and not physically contiguous (touching a boundary) to the subdivision, attached to this checklist. Clearly label list ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS. ❑ Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners physically contiguous (touching ❑ a boundary) including recorded purchasers under contract for deed to be sent certified mail attached to this checklist. Clearly label list CONTIGUOUS. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and ❑ addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed. ❑ Two sets additional mailing labels with the names and addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed attached. NOTICE Current property owners of record can be found at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office in the Gallatin County Courthouse 311 West Main Street Bozeman, Montana. CERTIFICATION - I Erik R Nelson,Thinktank Design Group Inc. hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all condominium owners, within 200 feet of the property located at 615 East Cottonwood is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. 1 , f4gIuM�DnN EYfrl4 Erik Nelson , fi1W 4d kuSDOnDD 4au. _ fr,c.:roie.io2e a:ss,asm , — -------------- Signature • 1 JAN-�8-L1t19---�------ CONTACT US _ Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building "t ho-ne 406-582-2260 LoMMUNITY 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) �6;581r;21263 -_f PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Noticing Materials Page 1 of 1 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms: PUDP CHECKLIST A Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan Review is the seccnd step in the PUD entitlement process. When a subdivision is proposed in conjunction with a zoning PUD the subdivision review shall be coordinated with the zoning review and a subdivision preliminary plat application shall also be submitted concurrent with this application. 1 Overall project narrative providing a thorough and extensive descripti)n of the page 36 overall project including design intent,project goals,project timeframe,proposed uses,site improvements and buildings. 2 A complete list of proposed relaxations to the BMC listed by individual section and page 46 reason for the relaxation. 3 Name,mailing address and full contact information for project team ircluding: page 10 owner,developer,architect,civil engineer,landscape architect/designer and electrical engineer. 4 A title report for subdivision or proposed subdivision guarantee with all current page 90 property ownership. 5 Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities page 3,36 and utilities and other related general information about proposed uses,adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land both existing and proposed.This shalt be in narrative and/or table formats.Provide the following supporting maps:existing land use map,community ptar land use designation map,city zoning map,neighborhood and entryway overlay map for property showing conditions within 200 feet of the project boundaries. 6 Overall land use ratios for: page 36,64 A. Existing footprints of existing buildings and structures B. Proposed buildings and structures C. Driveways and parking areas D. Streets,roads and alleys with areas of rights of way identified separately E. Private open spaces for residential uses F. Landscape areas G. City parkland 7 Overall project Floor Area Ratio(FAR)and Net Residential Density. page 9 8 Development Schedule.If phasing is proposed,provide narrative clear y describing project phasing with the proposed phasing of all infrastructure.buildings, driveways and parking and landscaping, 9 Phasing Plan exhibit clearly showing all site and infrastructure improvement with phase boundaries including detailed limits of construction and approaches to mitigate any conflicts with phase boundaries and site safety and function. 10 Phasing table that shows phase area and data for each phase includinc:area in acres and square feet,lot area in acres and square feet,building footprint square feet,building floor area.FAR,street right of way,common opens space, landscaped area.PUD open space square feet and percentage of total,PUD performance points by type and parking space requirements. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 27 • • PUDP CHECKLIST CONTINUED 11 Table of proposed buildings include phase information,footprint,gross square page 9,43 footage,stories,whether building is existing or proposed,and building use designations by building floor. 12 Colored aerial vicinity map within one-half mile of the site with project site and page 8 other significant community facilities,streets,trails,watercourses,railways, highways and other applicable features identified by name. 13 Overall site illustration in color showing all building footprints,landscaped areas, page 8 site circulation including vehicular,bike,and pedestrian facilities. 14 Statements of objectives and conformance to city policy and plans: A. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved page 65 by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Community Plan,provide specific land use goals and objectives in the Community Plan that are furthered by the proposed PUD; B. Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space page 57 areas and applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD; C. Estimate of number of employees for business,commercial,and page 60 industrial uses; D. Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the page 61 applicant; E. The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 38.20.090.E Inew code reference 38.430.090.E),documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use;the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the cbjective or criterion;the Director may require,or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section;any variance from the criterion shall be described; F. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being page 65,66 avoided or mitigated; G. Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption,(e.g. page 60 home/business,utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling). 15 If not provided by subdivision application materials,physiographic data and page 38 summaries for:landforms and geology and soils;hydrology;vegetation;noxious weeds;wildlife and viewsheds.If the project is a brownfietd site,provide site history,data and copies of any environmental site assessments that have been completed.An approved noxious weed management plan must be submitted. 16 Narrative descriptions of site access and overall utilities_including an overview, parking,existing and proposed condition of the streets providing access to the site, proposed accesses to the site and utilities including water,sewer,storm drainage, solid waste,gas,electric and shallow franchise facilities. 17 Development and Design Guidelines per Section 38.20.070.D.2 BMC. page 4 18 Comprehensive Signage Plan,if applicable. page 84 COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 28 i • SP1 CHECKLIST SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS All information and items below must be on site plan sheets and tot presented on separate attachments except narratives, legal documents,traffic studies,stormwater,sewer,water and wetland reports,if provided. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1 Project narrative describing the project type,proposed use scope,size(dwellings, sheet AS.000 building size(sl,building height(s),number of buildings,number of tota.parking spaces)intent,and phasing,if applicable.The narrative must include a response to the City's conceptual review comments. 2 Name of project/development. sheet AS.000 3 Name and mailing address of developer and owner. sheet AS.000 4 Name and mailing address of engineer,architect,landscape architect,planner,etc. sheet AS.000 5 Location of protect/development by street address/legal description. sheet AS.000 6 Location/vicinity map,including area within one-half mile of the site. sheet AS.000 7 A construction-oute map showing how materials and heavy equipmen•wilt travel to sheet AS.100 and from the sire out to one-half mile. SITE PLAN DATA 8 Boundary line cf property with dimensions. sheet AS.102 9 Date of plan preparation and changes. sheet AS.100 10 Nortl-point indicator. sheet ASA00-102, 110-114 11 Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet sheet AS.101 12 Parcel size(s)it gross acres and square feet. sheet AS.101 13 Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size Ifloor area sheet AS.101 ratio,FAR),with a breakdown by land use. 14 Location,percentage of parcel(sl and total site,and square footage of the following: sheet AS.102 A. Existing and proposed buildings and structures. B. Driveway circulation and parking areas. C. Landscaped areas. D. Private open space,provide boundary/ies and dimensions of each space provided[if residential requirement)on plans or separate exhibit.Provide a summary total types of dwelling units and total open space required and provided. E. City parks. F. Other public lands(school sites,public access greenway corridors,trail corridors,etc.). 15 Total-)umber(with number of bedrooms],type and density per type of cwellings, sheet AS.102 and total new and gross residential density and density per residential parcel. The density per parcel must be presented as net residential density peG section 38.700.130 Bmc. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 29 SM CHECKLIST CONTINUED SITE PLAN DETAILS The location, identification and dimensions of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet 1200 feet for PUD's) outside the site boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way unless otherwise stated. 16 Topocraphic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determines by the sheet C3.0 director. 17 Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Eozeman Area sheet AS.100 Zoning Jurisdiction,within or near the development. 18 Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site. sheet AS.100 19 Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for s tes sheet C1.1,2.0,2.1 adjacent to major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet-The fu-t width of the street including curb,gutter,sidewalk,drive approaches,iltersec:ions and street lighting must be shown for both sides of the street. 20 Block frontages. sheet AS.111,201-203 21 On site streets and rights-of-way.Including curb gutter,sidewalks,anc street sheet C2.1 lights. 22 Ingress and egress points vehicular& pedestrian. sheet AS.101,110,111 23 Traffic flow on site. see PUDP Appendix E 24 Traffic flow off site. see PUDP Appendix E 25 All parking facilities,including circulation aisles,access drives,covered and sheet AS.100,AS.110 uncovered bicycle parking and bicycle rack type and detail,compact spaces,ADA accessible spaces and motorcycle parking,on-street parking Idelineat?d by a 24' tong under interrupted spaces)directly adjacent to the project site outside of site vision triangles and hydrant locations),number of employee and non-e-npto,/ee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each. 26 Setbacks,building footprint and any proposed encroachments.Any setoack sheet AS.101 or property line encroachments must be clearly shown and be noted w;th encroachment type e.g.Awning,weather protection,cantilever,lighting,eave etc. 27 Utilities and utility rights of way and easements existing and proposed,including: sheet C2.0,2.1.4.0. A. Electric 5.0.6.0 B. Natural gas C. Telephone,cable and similar utilities D. Water E. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) 28 Surface water,including: C3.0,4.0,6.0 A. Ponds,streams and irrigation ditches(include classificationE be based upon a determination of the Gallatin Conservation District;no'e classification of each feature on plans). B. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands(include classifica ions based upon a determination of the Gallatin Conservation District,A-my Corps of Engineers,orwetland delineation report;note classificaticn of each feature on plans). COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 20119 page 30 SP1 CHECKLIST CONTINUED SITE PLAN DETAILS C. Floodplains as designated on the federal insurance rate map or that may otherwise be identified as lying within a 100 year f(oodplain through additional ftoodplain delineation,engineering analys s, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis. D. A f loodptain analysis report in compliance with Section 38.31 BMC. 29 Grading and drainage plan,including provisions for on-site retention/detention sheet C3.0,4.0 and water quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineerinc Division,or in compliance with BMC Section 14 storm drainage ordinance and best management practices manual adopted by the City.All surfac= stormwater facilities must demonstrate compliance with Section 38.41).080 BMC including providing cross sections for each facility. 30 All drainageways,streets,arroyos,dry gullies,diversion ditches,spillways, sheet C3.0,4.0 reservoirs,etc.Which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: A. The name of the drainageway[where appropriate). B. The downstream conditions(developed available drainageways,etc.+. C. Any downstream restrictions. 31 Significant rock outcroppings,slopes of greater than 15 percent or other sheet L4.00,L1.0 significant topographic features. 32 Sidewalks,walkways,driveways,crosswalks,loading areas and docks, sheet AS.101 bikeways,including typical details and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system,indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict. 33 Provision for disabled accessibility,including but not limited to,wheetc.iair sheet AS.103,104 ramps,parking spaces,handrails and curb cuts,including signage and construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance.A certification block must be provided on the plan sheets. 34 Fences,walls,railings and handrails,including typical details. sheet AS.104 35 Permanent trash enclosure and refuse collection areas,including typical sheet ASA11 details and elevations. 36 Construction management plan include exterior construction period material sheet AS.111 staging,spoits location and construction trash enclosure locationlsl.A:rash container type must be provided and detailed(40 yard roll off,fenced erclosur etc.l.If spoils storage is proposed a timeline for removal must be provided. 37 Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details. sheet AS.111 38 Location and extent of snow storage areas. sheet L5.00 39 Location and extent of street vision triangles extended to center of right of way sheet C2.1 including adjacent street intersections and all alley and driveway access points. 40 Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetat ve cover, sheet L2.00,L2.01 including existing trees and shrubs having a diameter greate-than 2.5 Inches, by species. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 31 • SP1 CHECKLIST CONTINUED 41 Historic,cultural and archaeological resources,describe and map an-,designated sheet C1.0 historic structures or districts,and archaeological or cultural sites. 42 Major public facilities,including schools,parks,shared use pathways trails,etc. sheet AS.000 Within a distance of 200 feet. PARKLAND AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING 43 If residential,provide the required parkland for the development,including sheet AS.102 calculations per Section 38.420 BMC(park and recreation requiremerts)in a table format,see table format in the PLS document. 44 If cash in lieu is proposed,a thorough calculation including the base requirement see PUDP Appendix H and any net based upon maximum density,narrative addressing the findings the Commission must make to grant cash in lieu,and the appraisal must oe provided to make the request per Section 38.420.030 BMC,unless using City va.tuation. 45 If parkland is proposed a park plan shall be submitted consistent with Section 38.220.060.A.16 BMC. 46 Source and amount of parkland credit to be used if previously providec.If from a subdivision confirm amount provided and detailed phase information as required in table format outlined in the PLS document. 47 Describe how the site plan will satisfy any requirements of Section 38.380,BMC (affordable housing]which have either been established for that lolls]through the subdivision process or if no subdivision has previously occurred are applicable to a site plan.The description shall be of adequate detail to clearly identi'y those tots and dwellings designated as subject to the section's compliance requirements and to make the obligations placed on the affected lots and dwellings readily understandable.If affordable housing is not being provided place that statement on the site plan sheets with the site data in item 8. 48 If affordable housing is provided,or cash in lieu is proposed use form AH. LIGHTING DETAILS 49 Lighting plan and electrical site plan,complete with all structures,pa-king sheet E1.0 spaces,building entrances,traffic areas(both vehicular and pedestrian). vegetation that might interfere with lighting,and adjacent uses,contai-iing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. 50 A photometric lighting plan that contains a layout of all proposed fixtbres by sheetE1.01• . location and type and extends the photometric information to the property boundaries and rights of way.For fueling canopies a second photomet-ic p required to specifically analyze the light output underneath the ,rjp lire o(7150 8 2u19 fuel canopy. 51 Details for all proposed exterior fixtures that are keyed to the fi. Y the lighting electrical plan and the photometric lighting plan.The deta l must demonstrate compliance with full cut-off requirements in Section 38.E70 BMC and be located on the lighting plan sheets. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 32 SP1 CHECKLIST CONTINUED BUILDING DESIGN AND SIGNAGE 52 Front,rear and side elevations of all buildings,structures,fences and walls sheet AS.201 - with height dimensions and roof pitches.Show open stairways,exterior AS.204 lighting,weather protection,awnings and other projections from exterior building walls.Building elevations must include proposed exterior building materials,windows and doors including a color and material palette for all proposed features keyed to the building elevations. 53 Provide transparency calculations for any elevation that faces a street and is a sheet AS.201 - block frontage.Provide minimum and maximum height of transparency from AS.204 grade.Provide area of transparency and percentage in relation to total facade. 54 Provide elevations and details of all ground mounted and rooftop mechanical sheet AS.104 screening. 55 Floor plans that include atl floors and roof plan.Annotate/designate uses for all sheet ASA 10- rooms and areas.Seating/serving area layout required for all restaurants. AS.114 56 Exterior signs if applicable.Include building frontage dimension(s)and sheet AS.201 - maximum sign area calculation,provide sign dimensions and square footage AS.204 of each.Note—the review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for sign area compliance with Section 38.560 BMC Isigns).A sign permit must be obtained from the building division prior to erection of any and all signs,addition design guidelines apply for signs within zoning overlay districts. LANDSCAPE PLAN A separate landscape plan shall be submitted as part of the site plan application unless the required landscape information can be included in a clear and uncluttered manner on a site plan with a scale where one inch equals 20 feet. All information must be on plan sheets. 57 Project name,street address,and lot and block description. sheet AS.000 58 Date,scale,north arrow,and the names,addresses,and telephone numbers sheet AS.000 of both the property owner and the person preparing the plan.Plan preparer shall be a state registered landscape architect;an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience in the state;or an individual with a degree in a related field Ihorticulture,botany, plant science,etc.)And at least five years of professional landscape design experience,of which two years have been in the state. 59 Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot. sheet AS.101 60 Existing and proposed grade that complies with maximum allowable slope and sheet C3.0 grade. 61 Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses,required watercourse sheet C3.0,4.0 setbacks,and the location of any 100-year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features;and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys,utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot. COTTOMWOO® ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 33 • • SM CHECKLIST CONTINUED 62 Location of all pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters. sheet C2.1 63 Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used sheet C4.0, for drainage control including proposed landscaping and seeding as required by sheet L4.01 Section 38.410.080.H BMC. 64 Location and extent of snow storage areas. sheet L5.0 65 Location and extent of street vision triangles,extended to the center of right of way. sheet C2.1 66 Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the sheet L2.00,L2.01 plan,including typical symbols,names Icommon and botanical name),locations, quantities,container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing and identification of drought tolerant and/or native and adapted species.The location and type of all existing trees on the tot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated. 67 Size of planting at the time of installation and at maturity. sheet L2.00,L2.01 68 Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off- sheet L2.00,L2.01 street parking and loading areas,including information as to the amount lin square feet)of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces. 69 Street frontage landscaping,including boulevard details and tree grate details as sheet L2.00,L2.01 applicable based upon block frontage. 70 Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including sheet L3.00 watercourse buffer zones demonstrating compliance with watercourse setback planting plan requirements per Section 38.410.100.A.2.F BMC unless previously provided during subdivision review. 71 Location,height and material of proposed landscape screening and fencing Iwith sheet L2.00,L2.01 berms to be delineated by one foot contoursl. 72 An indication of how existing healthy trees lif any)are to be retained and protected sheet L2.00,L2.01 from damage during construction. 73 Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters, sheet L2.00,L2.01 sculptures,and water features. 74 A description of proposed watering methods including any use of high efficiency sheet L3.00 irrigation technologies and best practice,source of irrigation water and estimated amount of water consumption broken down by vegetation type(e.g.Turf,shrubs, trees]and total estimated water consumption. 75 Areas to be irrigated and type of proposed irrigation and the irrigation system sheet L3.00 design plan. 76 Tabulation of performance points earned by the plan per Section 38.550.060 BMC. sheet L7.00 STREETS AND TRAFFIC 77 Traffic study.Street,traffic,and access information required in Section see PUDP Appendix E 38.220.060.A.12 BMC or that the requirement is waived in writing by the engineering division prior to application submittal. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 page 34 SP1 CHECKLIST CONTINUED WATER AND WATER RIGHTS 78 Water rights information.If cash in lieu is proposed a cash in lieu of water rights see PUDP page 74 calculation and payment amount certified by the engineering division. 79 If water wells are proposed,a letter from the department of natural resour=es confirming their intent to issue a permit or exemption. DEVIATIONS 80 Either through the site plan requirement above or separate exhibit clearly slow sheet AS.101 any proposed deviations related to site requirements such as yards/setacfs, lot coverage,parkir•g or other applicable standards. 81 Either through the building elevation requirement above or separate exh,bit sheet AS.201 - clearly show any proposed deviations related to building construction such as AS.204 height,second slor+additions,or other applicable standards. 82 For deviations in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay a deviation narralive see PUDP page shall be provided stating which Section(s)of the Bozeman Municipal Cede a-e 38-41 proposed for deviat on,to what extent and include a response to the following: A. How the modification is more historically appropriate fo-the bjilcing and site in question and the adjacent properties,as determired in Sectior 38.340.050 BMC than would be achieved under a t teral enforcement of this Chapter(Chapter 38,BMC1; B. How the modifications will have minimal adverse effect pn abutting properties or the permitted uses thereof;and C. How the modifications will assure the protection of the publi-heath, safety and general welfare. D. How the requested deviation will encourage restoration and rehabilitation activity that will contribute to the overall historic character of the community. If mere than one deviation,a response to the criteria shall be provided for each deviation. DEPARTURES 83 For departures,a departure narrative must be provided stating which Sect on(s)of the Bozeman Municipal Code are proposed for departure,the scope and extent of the plan proposed for departure and a response to the required departure criteria. If more than one departure,a summary and response to the criteria must l:e prov ded for each d aparture. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 35 • • SECTION 3 PROJECT OVERVIEW 3.00 PROJECT OVERVIEW & GOALS 3.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS & HISTORY 3.02 SITE ZONING & LAND USES 3.03 GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION 3.04 PROPOSED PUD POINTS 3.05 PROPOSED RELAXATIONS 3.06 ALIGNMENT OF GOALS WITH DISTRICT PLANS AND VISION NE GOALS 3.07 PUD COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES 3.08 PROPOSED OWNERSHIP 3.09 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES FOR BUSINESSES, RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPACT MITIGATION & DESIGN METHODS TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION 3.10 RATIONALE FOR CHOICES MADE BY THE APPLICANT 3.11 GENERAL SITE DATA COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 36 • 0 PROJECT OVERVIEW GOALS OF THE PROJECT 1. PROVIDE FOR DIVERSE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2. THOUGHTFULLY INTEGRATE INTO THE EXISTING COMMUNITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD 3. PROMOTE BY EXAMPLE SUPERIOR URBAN DESIGN STRATEGIES PROJECT VISION Cottonwood + Ida will create a vibrant and diverse community on a 2-acre underutilized mixed use site, providing a diverse range of housing types to meet the needs of Bozeman. The 92 dwelling units are designed to be attainable bymiddle-income residents. In order to respond to the variety of building uses and sizes in the surrounding neighborhood, the development is organized into four residential buildings providing a broad set of housing types: affordable and market-rate apartments, townhouses, live- work units, and urban lofts. While 15% of the rental units 17 of the 46 rental units) will be set aside for those earning less than 65% AMI to help achieve the goals established in the city's affordable housing ord.;aance, one of the guiding principles of the development is a focus or creating units that are affordable-by-design; with modest unit sizes, reduced parking demand, shared open space, and attractive common amenit es; all in a walkable and bike-friendly neighborhood. The 29,700 SF office building will attract mid-size commercial tenants looking for new or expanded space near the downtown district. The project supports the community's desire for a local arts culture, and acknowledges the neighborhood's industrial past by including 5,400 SF of artisan manufacturing workshops. Located primarily along the ground floor on Cottonwood Street, the workshops will activate the project's caen spaces, and encourage pedestrian activity along the street edge. A Public Mill Yard will occupy the center of the site, framed by the distinctive facade of the adjacent Misco Mill, and lined with commercial and residential uses to provide day and evEning, weekday and weekend activation. We will be renovating the existing grain building (building 51 to provide for a small scale restaurant/ cafe that will activate the Mill Yard throughout the day. We are pursuing site-wide certification under the LEER Neighborhood Development program. The specific sustainability and certification goals for individual buildings are still being researched and coordinated. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANIJARY 2019 page 37 • • EXISTING CONDITIONS & HISTORY The property does not have a registered historic value;however,the project is attempting to preserve the existing structure on the Southwest corner of the site that is believed to have predated 1937 based on aerial images from that era. A search through Polk Directories dating back to 1935 did not turn up any commercial listing at this site. It is believed that the Misco Mill on the adjacent property was constructed at the height of the dEpression in 1934 and the grain bin storage shortly after that. Below are the old ariel photographs along with current pictures of the property. 1 Site Location I n Uo f fg' a 1,* � .t« +� A o f f 1 00 C26J (t'I O C O 9 i t P_ D 0 Figure 2 1937 Aerial Photograph 605 East Cottonwood Street Bozeman.Montana Resource Technologies NOT TO SCALE 0 Inc. C (D7yGC�C'U®00 ¢ 0A RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL it II JANUARY 2019 page 38 • • EXISTING CONDITIONS & HISTORY CONTINUED A-NORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY IASPEN AND IDA) C r 1 B-NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY(ASPEN AND WALLACE) C-SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY(COTTONWOOD AND WALLACE) r 74PPM-- D-SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY(COTTONWOOD AND IDA) COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 39 EXISTING0 0 CONDITIONS & HIST1 CONTINUED BUILDINGEXISTING I BE REHABILITATED I PLAZA MILLION (BUILDING ' r SOUTH EAST Tw R- 1 r .r 1i► NORTH RESPONSE& JANUARY2019 EXISTING0 0 1N1 1N 1 • CONTINUED EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REHABILITATED - INTO PLAZA MILLION (BUILDING 5) 1 � P PRESERVE-ELEVATOR INTERIOR-ELEVATOR PRESERVE-CRIB CONSTRUCTION INTERIOR COTTONWOOD 1 RESPONSE& . SITE ZONIMG LAM® USES •r t ZONING 1 2 MILE ., _ K.P_ •� •�� •=� ❑ R-S (RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN) 1 r•. ❑ R-0 (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE) ❑ R-MH (RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME) °'`Ar. r � = ,. R-5 (RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE HIGH DENSITY) ' = ; L•L�0 El R-4 (RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY) ❑ R-3 (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY) ' �:{_n e. t� ;� R-2 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-HOUSEHOLD, MEDIUM DENSITY) •t'�} w' ❑ B-3 (CENTRAL BUSINESS) ;,-� ��`,r.tom, y: ,� ry � S 1.,•y .�s� � .. ❑ B-2 (COMMUNITY BUSINESS) - r {' i- ►+ i =` "` M-2 (MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL) • iYy t. :1 +� Y t r .1 r' y ❑ M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) 1• ; <y, ; #�io { '�''l` >` Q �.; ,.. '. ❑ HMU (HISTORIC MIXED USE) ❑ PLI (PUBLIC LANDS/INSTITUTIONS) �' I -T;� _r ' tf `�. o ��• � ' �„ ` ,� :. r r.r ' ,�1�:''�; rr — �Y y�i S ii - •�i .,ta �, -��"�1' i��y.��'J. y �• � Q�l ,v,•. LAND USES (1/2 MILE) ❑ MIXED USE IL RESTAURANT/BAR �►� - :-�- �� ❑ COMMERCIAL RETAIL SALES, SERVICES, BANKS #' HOTEL/MOTEL 1 � `" � •�� s �1 r : J,�t {: ❑ COMMERCIAL AUTO ADMINISTRATIVE/ 0 PR F ESSIONAL i - F�'` i %�: LIGHT MANUFACTURING f9 .Ll SK ❑ PARK OR OPEN SPACE CHURCH ❑ PUBLIC FACILITY �4 N' it � I � `, � !'!��! !�!_'.r�'2 `ytd�?c��L• ,`� ,. �4 ..�r�r ``�/ �� ❑ SCHOOL/EDUCATIONAL FACILITY C -� F It SINGLE-HOUSEHOLD RESIDENTIAL . ❑ MULTI-HOUSEHOLD RESIDENTIAL I,. , _� „a: l 'M *+ ❑ MOBILE HOME/MOBILE PARK UNDEVELOPED MOM VACANT ( NORTHJt C�GT7 Co LC'JCo�Col© CDQ a r RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II JANUARY 2019 page 42 j :-AN 2'8-2019 , AN 28 109 - IQOMr-. I'NITY DEVELOPMENT GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION BUILDINGS AND OTHER ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS RESIDENTIAL The development consists of 6 distinct buildings, providing 92 residential units, COMMERCIAL 29.700 SF of office space, 5,41JU 5f- of artisan manufacturing workshop spaces, a 96 - space below-grade parking garage, and community space: ARTISAN MFR. 1 APARTMENT BUILDING COMMUNITY Three and four stories over basement parking garage 22 Studio apartments r,f � r,__-�.r_—�1 ����� 24 1-Bedroom flats 46 Units total 2 APARTMENT BUILDING ' Throo clorioc over bosement parking garage 10 Sludius Willi Cunimon Spaces 18 Units Total ` 3 TOWNHOUSE-STYLE APARTMENTS 6 Thrpp stnrips nvpr gradf, d �� rT 6 1-Bedroom Flats �� y✓'� 6 2-Bedroom Townhouse-Style Apartments 12 Units Total _ - 4 LOFT APARTMENT BUILDING , 1 Three stories over grade y 4Sp 4 1-Bedroom Live Work Apartments 5 2 FN p �,\ \. S 12 2-Bedroom Loft-Style Apartments 16 Units Total \' Artisan manufacturing(4A) Approximately 5,400 GSF 14,59n npt SF)of ground floor workshop space to provide an active, prdrntrinn oriented street edge along Cottonwood Ave. 5 EXISTING REHABILITATED BUILDING Renovated open air pavillion to provide an opportunity for a cafe on the plaza,as well as accossory program for the adjocent open spaces(bike parking,storage,etc.). / Y / / /• 3 6 OFFICE BUILDING Approximately 29.7nn W;F P5,203, net SF)of open-plan office space 7 BELOW-GRADE PARKING GARAGE Approximately 96 spaces 8 LEASED OFF SITE PARKING LOT �1 f UNIT COUNT 40 34 18 92 PERCENTAGE 43% 37% 20% I 1 1,\*�/ "I x RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 / page 43 PROPOSED PUD POINTS PERFORMANCE POINTS SEC 38.430.090 E.2.7 A minimum of 20 points need to be achieved;we are expecting to achieve between 43 and 62 points. AFFORDABLE HOUSING density cal:ulaticns would be 16 units) 21 POINTS 50%increase factor=8 Three points for each percent of dwellings to be constructed in Proposed number of dwelling units=92 the residential development which are provided by long term contractual obligation to an affordable housing agency, for a Number of units iureased over base density=92-16= period not less than 20 years, with a written plan assuring on- 76 net increase going affordability pricing and eligibility monitoring, and annual Net increase divided by the 50%increase factor= re-certification. points=76/8=9.5 Per UDO 38.700.020 Environmentally contaminated land(does not apply) Affordable housing. Housing for persons earning less than 65 Points reached=4.77(commercial increase)+9.5 percent of the area's annua. median income for rental housing (residential increase)=14.27 and 100 percent of the area's annual median income for purchased housing.Further,affordable housing does not require Maximum allowable(1/3) total of 6.67 greater than 33 percent of the household gross annual median DESIGNED TO MEET LEED-ND income for housing. Annuat median income is defined by the 15 POINTS Department of Housing and Lrban Development The project design s based on LEED ND criteria. We intend on Points achieved = 21 (7 rental units [ 7.6%) will be provided at keeping the design to this standard and hope to achieve these rental rates at a maximum of 65%AMI points. The project has,been registered and certified under ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE current LEED version 4.Tie project is on track to achieve LEED 9.37 POINTS Neighborhood Development Plan certification and possibly LEED Silver.See the LEED information provided in the appendix for the One and '/a point for each percentage of the project area that is certification requirements and abreakdown of the LEED points provided as publicly accessible open space. Project land area = expected be achieved. 90,000 sf Publicly accessible p;aza area = 6750 sf/7.5% of the - project total.See Sheet AS.102 _and Dedication Table.These are INCLUSION OF LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN the public plazas indicated as Aspen Yard and Mill Yard. 6 POINTS UNDERUTILIZED AND BROWNFIELD SITES The use of tow impact development standards is a project goat 6.67 POINTS and we hope to achieve these points by treating on-site storm water exceeding chapter 40 requirements, incorporating a The site is 2 acres and the south acre previously had a scale integrated snow storace management plan,select plant species hobby train located on the site. The north half of the site has that meet drought tolerant standards,inclusion of weather based been occupied by an industrial Narehouse. Accounting for the irrigation systems and Jmit the amount and type of sod. underutilized south portion a minimum of one point will be achieved. Per(d) BUILDING NEIGH 1 0 PUBLIC OPO4 SPACE PROVIDED ARE [] ENHANCED STREETSCA?E Underutilized and brownfield sites.One point for each 50 percent. AVERAGE ROOF increase in the total square footage of commercial and/or HEIGHT ABOVE THE >k WAYFINDING FEATURES industrial floor area on underutilized sites; one point for each PARKING GARAGE _ 3F RECYCLING STATION 50 percent increase in the total number of dwelling units on underutilized sites; one point for each acre developed of the t t� environmentally contaminated land; up to a total of one-third of the performance points required to be earned. t # Existing industrial/commercial floor area=10,488 48 SF _ 49 50%increase factor=5,244 SF 31 Proposed commercial floor area=35.521 SF 35, Amount of increased SF=35,521 -10.488=25.033 SF Number of 50%increase factors/points=25,033/ l 5,244=4.77 One point for each 50%increase in total=4.77 Existing number of dwelling units=0 I using base L � _ COTTONWOOD ¢ IDS, RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 20+9 pEge 44 • • PROPOSED PUB POINTS CONTINUED AFFORDABLE HOUSING 7.6% OF THE UNITS OFFERED AT 65%AMI 21 ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE PROJECT PROVIDES ADDITIONAL PUBLIC OPEN 9.37 SPACE OF 6,750 SF OR 7.5% OF THE PROJECT TOTAL NOT USED- HOWEVER WE ARE PROPOSING ADAPTIVE REUSE OF BUILDING TO REUSE THE GRAIN DEPOT BUILDING AS A 0 COMMUNITY CENTER UNDERUTILIZED BROWNFIELD SOUTH 1 ACRE IS CURRENTLY UNDERUTILIZED AND 6.67 SITE COULD BE CLASSIFIED AS A BROWNFIELD SITE DESIGNED TO MEET LEED-ND FOLLOWING LEED-ND CRITERIA FOR TOTAL 15 DEVELOPMENT INCLUSION OF LOW-IMPACT GREEN PRACTICES FOR STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT, LIMITED USE OF SOD, DROUGHT 6 TOLERANT PLANTS, ETC. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND NOT USED - HOWEVER ALL BUILDINGS WILL CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATE BEST PRACTICES FOR SUSTAINABLE 0 DESIGN NOT USED - HOWEVER THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE INTEGRATED WAYFINDING USE INTEGRATED WAYFINDING MEASURES FOR 0 MEASURES PARKING, PLAZAS, OFF SITE LOCATIONS,AND RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITIES ON SITE RECYCLING NOT USED - HOWEVER THE PROJECT WILL INCLUDE TRANSFER STATION RECYCLING FACILITIES FOR BOTH COMMERCIAL 0 AND RESIDENTIAL USES NOT USED - HOWEVER ENHANCED STREETSCAPES STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG COTTONWOOD,ASPEN 0 AND IDA TOTAL POINTS NEEDED REQUIRED POINTS TO MEET PUD CRITERIA 20 TOTAL POINTS ANTICIPATED POINTS THE PROJECT IS EXPECTED TO MEET 58 C 8770MA20® ¢ FDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 45 9 • PROPOSED RELAXATIONS REQUESTED RELAXATIONS FROM APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF THE UDC CHAPTER 38 Based on the underlying zoning of NEHMU we are requesting relaxations relative to the PUD for consideration. The goal of the project is to create a development that responds to the unique character of the district and provides for the needs of the community at large. The NEHMU is a unique district characterized by a broad spectrum of uses from residential to industrial. In many ways, this district was the first mixed use neighborhood in Bozeman. Our proFosal includes a mix of both residential and commercial activity that responds well to the variety of uses. Over time the neighborhood has evolved to include more service-oriented businesses and is now host to cafes and coffeeshops along with a strong pattern of residential uses. We are requesting a total of eight relaxations to achieve the project which are outlined below. RELAXATION 1: APARTMENT BUILDINGS AS AN ALLOWABLE USE • CODE PROVISION: 38.310.040 Authorized uses - Commercial, mixed-use and industrial • TABLE 38.310.040.C: Permitted residential uses in commercial, mixed-use, and industrial zoning districts We are requesting that apartment buildings be included in the allowable uses for this project. In an effort provide more affordable rental housing for the City of Bozeman we are looking to provide apartments as a primary use type within the NEHMU. Rationale:The need for market rate and affordable rentals in walkable neighborhoods is key to the future success and livability of Bozeman. The current zoning typE (NEHMU)was developed long ago as a bridge between residential uses and industrial uses. Overtime the neighborhood has evolved to become more of a residential enclave hosting many homes, cafes and artist3 while keeping the unique manufacturing vibe. Our project hopes to build on these trends and provide more opportunities and variety for housing. The additional housing will make the opportunity for residents to work and live in the same neighborhood. The added housing will create the possibility to provide both affordable units as well as market rate options. • The current zoning allows for apartments as an accessory use and is permitted on the second floors of commercial uses. We feel that our approach will make a better connection to the street by allowing residences to occur on the ground floor, as well as the second and subsequent floors. Residential uses are permitted on the ground floor in other portions of the code for this district and thus this would be consistent with that. RELAXATION 2: SMALL SCALE RESTAURANTS INCREASE IN SIZE FROM 1500 TO 2200 SF • CODE PROVISION: 38.310.040 Authorized uses - Commercial, mixed-use and industrial • TABLE 38.310.040.C: Permitted residential uses in commercial, mixed-use, and industrial zoning districts We are requesting an increase in the area of small-scale restaurants allowed in the NEHMM from 1500 SF as noted in Table 38.310.040 from 1500 SF to 2200 SF13,000 SF if outdoor seating space is included). Rationale:The current code provides for a maximum of 1500 SF for restaurant service area in the NEHMU. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL It II JANUARY 2019 page 46 PROPOSED RELUNIONS CONTINUED We are redeveloping an existing historic grain building into a possible restaurant space and would like to utilize the entire building for a future restaurant. The building area is 2,175 SF and we have planned to have interior service area of 1200 SF and outdoor service area of uo to 900 SF. While the space in the interior meets the current code limits, we would like to provide outdoor seating for patrons to enjoy the generous public plaza (Mill Yard) being created. It is understood that the outdoor seating would mostly be activated seasonally and concurrently with a greater amount of pedestrian / bike traffic. An objective of the Growth Policy is to provide for and support infill development that respects context of the existing development surrounding it. By preserving and reusing this historic building and completing the plaza space with a restaurant use it will attain many of the goals of the Growth Policy, and will produce a better outcome than the current code would have otherwise provided. RELAXATION 3: REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK • CODE PROVISION: 38.320.050 Form and Intensity standards - Non-residential and other mixed use districts • TABLE 38.320.050: zone type NEHMU - Front Setback The current zoning front setback requirement is listed as 20'and the project seeks to allow for a 10'setback around the entire site at grade. The project seeks a setback of 8'along Aspen Street above the clearance requirements Of underground utility easements. This front setback is larger than the 10' in many cases as the project has created public through ways into the site to access an internal public plaza space. Rationale: The intent of the project is first and foremost to create a vibrant street edge that responds to the conditions in the neighborhood. The neighborhood is marked by several historic homes and argi- industrial structures that were built long before setbacks were dictated in the zoning code. Because of this there is a tremendous variation of setbacks from the street edge it the neighborhood. Our mixed-use project is looking to develop at a pattern more consistent with urban standards to be more efficient with land use as well as create a stronger pedestrian experience. We are seeking the front yard setbacks be 10' rather than the required 20' at grade. The 20' setbacks certainly set a more suburban standard and would not convey the same sense of pedestrian experience.Additionally, the properties along both Aspen 131 and Cottonwood 110'1 currently have setbacks around this 10' dimension or less and we feel that the street edge pattern would be better served to match these relationships. The requested 8'setback for buildings I and building 6 along Aspen Street occurs above the clearance requirements for underground utility easements provided along the front property boundty.This request provides shade and cover along entrances as required by the frontage requirements. RELAXATION 4: REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK TO ALLOW FOR ZERO LOT LINE CONDITION • CODE PROVISION: 38.320.050 Form and Intensity standards - Non-residential and other mixed- use districts • TABLE 38.320.050: zone type NEHMU - Side Setback The current zoning side setback requirement is listed as 3'and we are requesting that zero lot line conditions are allowed per other zones identified in the BMC 38.320.050.0 Table of Form and Intensity Standards.Adding allowance for zero lot lines to the NEHMU minimum setbacks required for the NEHMU for this PUD. Rationale: The setback reduction provides for the creation of separate lots on this unique mixed-use project.This separation only occurs between lots A and B for Building 3. It will appear to all passersby that COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II I) JANUARY 2019 page 47 PROPOSED RELAXATIONS CONTINUED there is in fact a 20' separation between Building 2 on Lot A and Building 3 on Lot B. This is because the only portions of the buildings that exhibit the zero lot line condition are below grade at the parking garage level. All the appropriate easements and accesses will be reflected in the final lot boundary alignment RELAXATION 5: INCREASE IN BUILDING HEIGHT • CODE PROVISION: 38.320.050 Form and Intensity standards - Non-residential and other mixeJ- use districts • TABLE 38.320.050: zone type NEHMU - Maximum building height The current building height in the district is 45']exclusive of elevator penthouses and parapets]. Whi'e there sra several historic buildings in the district that exceed this height limitation, it is our intent tG acnieve a building height only marginally higher than the 45'and are requesting a maximum building height as described by cote of 54'. Rationale: The project proposes a cluster of 3-story buildings on the perimeter of the 2-acre site anc create landscaped podium level with parking hidden underneath. The e-fective buitcing heigh` from the podium level is near to or at 45' for all buildings. These additional heights are needed to 3cccmmod3.e the parking level below the podium. The primary reason for this was to keep the parking structure ou- of the seasonal high-water table which is at 8' below grade.The site natura'ly drops 4' from the Scuth to R,e North which provides a way to diminish the effects the below grade parking has. Bui.ding .ieights range throughout the project from 25' to 54' measured from the sidewalk level, with most of the street faces having approximately a 47' height. RELAXATION 6: SEEKING AN INCREASE IN LOT COVERAGE FROM 40%TO 45% • CODE PROVISION: 38.320.050 Form and Intensity standards - Non-residential and othei mixec- use districts • TABLE 38.320.050: zone type NEHMU - Lot Coverage The current zoning Maximum lot coverage 138.320.020.A1 is 40% for primarily residential uses and 100% for primarily nonresidential uses. The project would be classified as primarily residential given that the bulk of th.e use square footage is programmed as residential. Specifically, 72%is resider,tial and 26% ;s commercial use. The project is a requesting an increase in lot coverage from 40% to 45%. Rationale: The projec-. has been thoughtfully designed to provide for a mix of uses on tie site. Given thy. portions of the site are in fact commercial we feel that this additional lot coverage is minimal and any loss to the perceived open area that might have come with 5% less in lot coverage is more thar made up for in the positive attributes of the design. The current site design is 41.4% lot coverage, however there may be some adjustments needed through the final design, thus the request of 45%. Additional:y, a consiJerable amount of our site area is being dedicated for public access for the community to enjoy. RELAXATION 7: SEEKING A DECREASE IN BLOCK FRONTAGE TRANSPARENCY REQUIRENEN—S FOR PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT • CODE PROVISION: 38.510.030.0 Landscape Block frontage standards COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL it II JANUARY 2019 page 48 • • PROPOSED RELAXATIONS CONTINUED The blockfrontage standards state that a "Landscaped" frontag: adjacent for residential have a minimum transparency(percentage of glass)of 15%. We are requesting a re!9yation to this for Building 2[along the East face, Ida frontage]and Building 3 (on the North, facing the private residential plaza and on the South, facing the Cottonwood frontage). In all of these cases we are able to meet a 8% transparency requirement. We are requesting that the facade transparency requirement be 8%for these locations Rationale:The project has been thoughtfully designed to providg-for privacy,views and quality pedestrian experience along the street and sidewalk edge. These buildings all contain residential uses and have allocated windows for views and privacy. Given the space planning requirements for the individual residential units, windows have been placed to correspond v,ith floors plans and to maintain energy efficiencies. The well thoughtout landscape plan and site circL.ation has provided a quality pedestrian experience for the guest to the site, along with the residents. These reductions in transparency will produce a superior quality design for this project than would otherwise be sound in the strict enforcement of the code. REQUESTED RELAXATIONS OR DEPARTURES FROM OTHER PORTIONS OF THE CODE RELAXATION 8: SEEKING A DECREASE IN BLOCK FRONTAGE TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT • CODE PROVISION: 38.510.030.B Storefront Block frontage standards The block frontage standards state in table 38.510.030.B that at least 60% of the ground floor area between 30"and 10'above the sidewalk on primary facades be transparent,%glazed. Ale are requesting a reduction to this such that a minimum of 30%is allowed. The project contains a ceuale of instances of this Building 4 along Cottonwood Street. Rationale: The project is designated as a mixed block front stard3rd and as such we have addressed portions of the project as landscaped frontages and portions tha: more closely resemble storefront. In all cases, the very best design effort has been applied to ensure -tat the invent of the code is being met. In the case of Storefront standards the various buildings that this applies tc are Building 4, and Building 5. Building 4 is intended to be for small 'makers studio spaces" w�i..e other use may Le appropriate this is the intent and to enhance these artist studios feet we have provided generous 8' wide glass garage doors along with full glass entry doors for each of the studios. We feel that this approach will enhance the character of the district by encouraging artist appropriate spaces whicl- are not necessarily spaces that have full glass across the front because much of the work it the process might not want to be on display. Building 4 provides 48% of the required transparency. The other irstance where this occurs in on Building 5 which is quasi-historic grain building that has existing :rib corstructed watts on the North, West, and South. The North face in the one that faces the street an-- given the desire to preserve as much of these existing wood watts we needed to limit the amount of glass on this facade:The intended use for this building is that of a small cafe while having a larger percentac? of glass along Cottonwood might be beneficial in this case the building also enjoys three other elevat cns that face Aubh ace(thaat afford the needed transparency for the building's occupants. Additionally,.o) .pe x nee u Inot be sacrificed with the reduction in lass due in art the well-desi +fr�.p it fthi c in as well 9 P 9I jhi�j 4 , g 1 ,COMMUNITY DEVELCPc���Erl, l COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 49 • • PROPOSED RELAXATIONS CONTINUED as the abundance of pedestrian plaza space that surround this building and project. This relaxation will produce a superior design and experiential outcome than would have otherwise been afforded with the strict interpretation of the code as can be seen from the well thought out and unique designs of all of the buildings. RELAXATION 9: PARKING CALCULATION FOR RESIDENTIAL USES SPECIFICALLY FOR EFFICIENCY AND ONE-BEDROOM UNITS Division 38.540 Parking 38.540.050 Number of parking spaces required A. 1. Residential uses • CODE PROVISION: Table 38.540.050-1 EFFICIENCY DWELLING UNITS The current code utilizes a calculation for efficiency units at a rate of 1.25 parking spaces per efficiency unit. We are requesting a relaxation to this that is similar to other zoning districts in our community of 1 parking space per efficiency unit. ONE BEDROOM UNITS The code calculates the number of parking spaces fora one-bedroom unit at 1.5 parking spaces for each one- bedroom unit. We are requesting that a rate of 1.25 parking spaces for each one-bedroom unit which is also applied to other zoning districts in our community. Rationale: The mix and types of housing provide an opportunity to more critically study the parking allowances for this project. The project is mostly composed of 1 bedroom and efficiency units that range in size from as low as 315 SF up to 600 SF 1 bedroom units. These smaller units provide efficiency as well as a greater likely hood of a single occupant in most cases. The parking standards used elsewhere in the country and even within the City of Bozeman Standards allow for efficiency units to be counted at a factor of 1 and for one-bedroom units factored at 1.25. The location of this property within walking distance to many basic services, transit availability, car share and well-developed bike facilities will promote the use of alternate means of transportation other than a car. Additionatty, creating other opportunities for commercial activities on site will allow for some residents to walk to work and not find the need for a car. The project is taking a progressive approach to design and planning that considers modern trends in housing and in car ownership. A recent study from Stanford University economist Tony Seba found that private car ownership will drop 80% by 2030. While this is a bit of a stretch for rural Montana, statistics are showing a general decline in car ownership and an increase in multimodal transportation options. RELAXATION 10: PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES ADJUSTMENTS TO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS • CODE PROVISION: 38.540.050 Number of parking spaces required,A. 2. Non-residential uses • CODE PROVISION: Table 38.540.050-3 COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 50 The current code provides for adjustments to minimum standards for parking in commercial zone types and provides a genera;percentage reduction based on the type of uses and whether or not it is in a mixed-use neighborhood. These reductions range from 10% to 50%. We are requesting a reduction to our nonresidential parking demand of 40%. Rationale: The current zoning district was the first mixed use designation for the City and one of the smallest. While it holds this distinction, it is also one of the most overlooked districts as changes and modifications have occurred elsewhere in the code to support mixed use neighborhoods. This d strict matches what a small-scale community commercial mixed-use district looks and performs like, hosting a variety of services, employment opportunities and housing. We are looking to apply the same standards that are found elsewhere in the code and a similar redcction found in the ITE standards for mixed use projects. These standards provide for a contemplated redaction in parking for nonresidential use in a mixed use neighborhood since many of the patrons and employees would likely live within walking distance and would not require as many parking spaces to accommodate them. Additionally, access to other forms of transportation including, car share, transit, and welt- developed bike faci.ities will further promote the non- reliance on the automobile. Another practical application of this that is applied in the ITE is based on the actual hours of use based on each use type in a mixed use project. For instance ITE calculations show that the average wee'%day parking demand at its highest at 4:00 pm when both residential and nonresidential uses overlap 44% and 90% respectively. This would still only require a total of 124 spaces for the project, where we cave collectively provided 200 spaces. This is a logical use of parking reductions that will provide greater opportunity for a successful mixed-use neighborhood. RELAXATION 11: PROVIDE FOR BACK OUT ANGLED PARKING ALONG THE COTTONWOOD STREET FRONTAGE • CODE PROVISION: UDC 38.400.050.A.1 The current code states that all streets shall meet the City of Bozeman current design standards and specifications policy and that the City of Bozeman Modifications of the Montana Public Works Standards Specifications shall apply. These standards do not provide for back out angled parking along a local street. We are requesting that back out angled parking be allowed given that this will,match the full existing full street section along Cottonwood. The owner's association for the project will be responsible for snow removal for this portion of the street. Rationale: The existing street section along Cottonwood has back out angled parking along the South curb line.We are proposing to continue this condition along the North curb line in front of our project The cohesiveness of the s-.reet section will be better served by having matching conditions along both sides of the street. Additionally, Cottonwood is not a through street in the sense that this portion of Cottonwood only runs for three blocks in the NEHMU. The street will function more as a parking street than a through street in this instance and will produce a superior design outcome than would otherwise be had with tie strict enforcement of the code. All other conditions of street drainage and design specifications will De met with the final engineering design.As mentioned above the owner's association will be responsible for the maintenance of the proposed parking area this will include the snow removal and maintenance of the parking surface area. This is noted in draft condominium documents. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 51 1 ALIGNMENT OF GOALS WITH DISTRICT PLANS AND VISION NE GOALS Oil HONOR/ENHANCE UNIOUE CHARACTER THROUGH MASSING SCALE,AND PLACEMENT OF BUILDINGS ON THE SITE THE PROJECT HONORS THE SCALE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.ADDITIONALLY, PROGRAM OF PLACE OF THE DISTRICT AND FOSTER A SENSE ,�/�J �/�/ `CJ/J ,�/A `C//J ELEMENTS SUCH AS ARTISTS, MAKERS ETC. HELP FOSTER A SENSE OF PLACE. SUPPORT INFILL DEVELOPMENT THAT / / / / THE LOCATION OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDING EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE CREATED A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR INFILL IN ITS TRUEST SENSE.THE MASSING AND PROVIDES ADDITIONAL DENSITY AND SCALE OF THE BUILDINGS GO FURTHER TO RESPECT THE UNIQUE CONTEXT OF THE SITE BY MAINTAINING 3 STORIES WHILE STILL ADDING THE NEEDED DENSITY TO RESPECTS CONTEXT ACHIEVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS AND REDUCE THE IMPACTS OF SPRAWL ON OUR COMMUNITY. PROMOTE ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND / / / THE PROJECT MEETS LEED NO STANDARDS AND INCORPORATES SEVERAL SUSTAINABLE DESIGN TECHNIQUES.THE USE OF UNDERGROUND PARKING, CLOSE PROXIMITY BUILDING&PLANNING TECHNIOUES �v/J `/J ,`'/�J TO SERVICES,ADDITIONAL BIKE AND MULTI -MODAL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS AND GREENROOFS ALL ADD TO THE BEST PRACTICES OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND DESIGN AND PLANNING. PROVIDE SAFE,HEALTHY PUBLIC / / / THROUGH THE CREATION OF ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAZAS AND WALKS A HEALTHIER NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND _�/�J `�'/� `e'/� THROUGH THIS PROJECT.ADDITIONALLY THE NATURE OF THIS INFI LL DEVELOPMENT WILL DECREASE THE NEED FOR AUTOMOBILES AND WILL CONTRIBUTE TO A MORE INFRASTRUCTURE WALKABLE COMMUNITY. SUPPORT ARTISTS AND PROVIDE / / PROVIDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ARTIST RESIDENCES AND STUDIO SPACES AND INCORPORATING PUBLIC ART IN THE PLAZA SPACES WILL HELP TO SUPPORT LOCAL OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC ART �`!/J �% ARTISTS AND OVERALL IMPACT OF ART IN OUR COMMUNITY. RECOGNIZE IMPORTANCE OF BRIDGER / BY KEEPING THE BUILDINGS ON THE PERIMETER TO A MAXIMUM OF 3 STORIES AND BREAKING UP THE BUILDINGS INTO SEVERAL SMALLER BUILDINGS RATHER THAN ONE VIEW SHED AND NEIGHBORHOOD `�fA `�J/� `C//� LARGE ONE TO MAINTAIN VIEW ANGLES THROUGH THE SITE. IMPACTS PROMOTE SECURE PUBLIC OPENSPACES, / / / / / THE PROJECT HAS OVER 20,000 SF OF PUBLIC PLAZA SPACES AND NEARLY A 1/4 MILE OF PEDESTRIAN WALKS THAT WILL BE IMPROVED WITH THIS PROJECT. POCKET PARKS,URBAN ROOMS,PLAZAS ADDITIONALLY THE THROUGH CONNECTIONS ON SITE WILL INCREASE THE WALKABLITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND PUBLIC GATHERING SPACES ENCOURAGE THE INCLUSION OF / / / THE PROJECT PROVIDES 7.6%OF THE UNITS AT AFFORDABLE RATES AND THE BALANCE OF UNITS ARE INTENDED TO BE ATTAINABLE AT 65%AMI.THE GOAL OF BOTH AFFORDABLE HOUSING !`/J �VJ `V�J AFFORDABLE AND ATTAINABLE HOUSING IS AT THE CENTER OF THIS PROJECT AND WILL GO A LONG WAY TOWARDS PROVIDING THE NEEDED HOUSING STOCK FOR BOZEMAN. CREATE A BROAD RANGE OF HOUSING / / / THE PROJECT INCLUDES A RANGE OF HOUSING TYPES AND SIZES, FROM 2 BEDROOM TOWNHOUSE FL ATS,AS WELL AS 2 BEDROOM, 1 BEDROOM,STUDIO AND EFFICIENCY TYPES �v/J �/J �/J APARTMENT UNITS.THIS RANGE WILL MEET THE NEEDS OF A VERY BROAD DEMOGRAPHIC AND KEEP THE NEIGHBORHOOD VIBRANT. NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN AND HUMAN / / / THE PROJECT FINDS THE RIGHT BALANCE OF THE NEED FOR DEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE HOUSING, OFFICES.AND ARTIST SPACES WHILE KEEP THE SCALE OF THE SCALE �`,/J `�//J `�//J OVERALL DEVELOPMENT COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND PROVIDES A HUMAN SCALE.THIS IS DONE BY KEEPING BUILDING HEIGHTS TO THREE STORIES, PLACING PARKING UNDERGROUND,AND BREAKING THE BUILDINGS INTO SMALL CLUSTERS THAT WILL PROVIDE THE HUMAN SCALE. STRATEGICALLY INVEST IN URBAN / / / THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE CENTER OF THE NORTHEAST URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT AND THROUGH THIS DEVELOPMENT SEVERAL OF THE CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT AND RENEWAL `CJ/J `CJ/J ,�/�J THE MUCH NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE COMPLETED.THIS WILL PROMOTE THE LONG TERM GOALS OF THE DISTRICT AND CONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANTLY TO THE OVERALL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDS OF THE CITY. RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 page 52 • • PUD COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES PUDP Checklist 14 E. Explanation for each of the Community Design Objectives and criteria in -De--tiDI 38.430.090.E SECTION 38.430.090.E DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND PUD CRITERIA A.ALL DEVELOPMENT 1. Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply,trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigations companies, fire protections, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas,telephone,storm drainage,cable television,and streets? Yes - all services and systems conform to the latest building codes adopted by the City cf Bozeman Building Department. Standard services including water, sanitary supply, fire protection meet the current standards and codes issued by the City of Bozeman. Tra,ls, walkways and bikeways have been provided both onsite as wEll as logical connections to the surrounding neighborhood networks. 2. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? N/A - there are not significant existing natural vegetation features to be preserved. The current site conditions have about 45% of the site covered with building or paved surface and the unpaved areas have unmaintained weeds and bushes. The project will have less_ solid surface lot coverage and will have extensive landscaping. These are 6 trees that will need to be removed to accommodate the podium construction. Over 30 new trees will be planted. on site with this project. 3. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. Buildings, circulation,open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes - the layout of the buildings and placement of the plaza provide for open and direct connections across the site, and efficient circulation for both the residents and the public. 4. Does the arrangement of elements of the site plan(e.g.Building construction,orientation, and placement;transportation networks;selection and placement of landscape materials; and/ or use of renewable energy sources; etc.) Contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Yes - this infill project contributes to the overall reduction of energy, as does the walk3b [it/ of the site plan and street edges. These have further been reinforced through the LEED Neighborhood Design Status we will achieve through this development. 5. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. Buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize privacy of the residents of the project? Yes - special consideration has been given to the various types of dwelling units to provide both privacy and accessibility. Ground level units will incorporate private outdoor spaces that will function as a privacy screen from other at grade activities. The second and third. floo- COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 )age 53 • • PUD COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES CONTINUED units afford privacy due to their placement above grade. Each building is designed to maximize privacy while encouraging interaction with the other residents and community members through plaza spaces and shared roof decks. 6. Parkland - Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration and has the area of parkland or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by Section 38.420.020? Yes - we have provided all the open space and parkland required by the code. The primary organizing factor and key design goal was to create common public Spaces that invite activity for residents, office users and neighborhood denizens to enjoy. We have accomplished this through the thoughtful arrangements of buildings - creating open spaces that vary in scale and character across the site. These include public plazas, private residential plazas, private personal outdoor spaces and balconies, and shared roof decks. 7. Performance-All PUDs must earn at least 20 performance points. Yes - we have achieved 58 points for the project. For specifics, see Section 3.04, page 44-45 of this document. 8. Is the development being properly integrated into the development and circulation patters of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad"to adjoining development? Yes - the project will create new connections to the neighborhood through the construction of upgraded street networks and sidewalks. The public plaza spaces will afford access and views through the site further connecting the project to the neighborhood. SECTION 38.430.090.E DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND PUD CRITERIA A. MIXED USE Planned unit developments in mixed-use areas IREMU, UMU, and NEHMU Zoning Districts) may include commercial, light industrial, residential and mixes of various primary and F-ccessory uses. The types or combination of the uses are determined based upon its merits, benefits, potential impact upon adjacent land uses and intensity of development. 1. Is the project substantially consistent with the intent and purpose statements for the underlying zoning district? Yes - The underlying zoning is NEHMU, the 'intent of this area is to allow private and case-by- case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses." Additionally, "The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 54 • • PUD COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES CONTINUED elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses." This project is very consistent with this intent. We include a range of housing types, and a range - and type - of commercial activity consistent with the zoning. 2. Is the project located adjacent or within proximity to an arterial or collector street that provides access to the site? Yes -The property is located 300 feet from Peach Street(Collector)and 300 feet from Tamarack Street (Collector) and 900+/- feet from Rouse Ave which is designated as a Principal Arterial in the City street network. 3. Is the project on at least two acres of land? Yes - 2.01 acres 4. Do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD, pedestrian and vehicular circulation,architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities, streetscapes etc.? Yes 5. Does the overall project exceed the FAR "floor area ratios" envisioned for the underlying zoning district? N/A - none specified for the NEHMU district. The F.A.R. for this project is 1.8 6. Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? Yes - The character of the surrounding area has a mix of residential and commercial activity. There are two- and four-story mixed-use residential projects, a 70 feet repurposed grain elevator, metal warehouse buildings, historic brick buildings and single-family homes. We strove to develcp a mass and scale that is consistent with this while being able to provide opportunities for more affordable units. The use of materials and unique architecture further reinforces the character of the district. 7. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future offsite parking areas that contain more than 10 spaces? Yes - the project will lease parking spaces on an adjacent site which will have more than 10 spaces (72 spaces). Additionally, given that this project is surrounded on three sides by public streets c-eates direct connections both vehicular and pedestr an with the surrounding neighborhood. 8. Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman Growth Policy? COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 55 • 0 PUD COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES CONTINUED Yes -The project is exemplary of infill, it is taking an underutilized warehouse/brownfield site and redeveloping it to include a mix of both residential uses and commercial act vity that will efficiently use the surrounding infrastructure. 9. Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas (such as urban plazas,,courtyards, landscaped areas,open spaces,or urban trails)for the use and enjoyment of those living in, working in or visiting the development? Yes - The project has provisions for urban plazas, courtyards, landscaped areas, access to off site open spaces and trails. See Landscape. 10. Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g. private setbacks, patios and/or balconies etc.) for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light, sun, ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Yes - per the UDC the project has provided private outdoor spaces, )atios and balconies per code for use by both commercial units and residential units. 11. Does the project provide outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? Yes - The uses contemplated in this project would be more passivE recreation in nature, however the project is located along a trail system that connects to the Story Mil% mark which offers many active recreational opportunities. 12. Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and provide efficient public services and faculties? Yes - The very nature of infill development and specifically this project achievinc LEED ND Standards provides further evidence of the project's commitment to corserving energy and preserving the natural environment. 13. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and urban styles design to address the com:runity-wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? N/A - No density bonuses are proposed - however we meet housing diversity and Effordability metrics. 14. Residential Density bonus. N/A - The project is not proposing any residential density bonuses. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 56 • 0 PROPOSE® OWNERSHIP The project will be orcanized under a condominium regime, see Appendix L for Draft Condominium Documents where each building will pay a proportionate share to the condo master to cover common areas (including public common areas), limited common area, and general maintenance. Each building wilt also have its own condominium owner's association that can manage more building-specific issues such as elevators, stair towers, mail rooms and other common and limited common elements. OWNERSHIP OWNS/MAINTAINS: Parking Lots -• General Common Areas Outside of Bldgs(Landscaping) • • Building#5(Public Use) Land Under Buildings BUILDING 4 BUILDING 6 RESIDENTIAL(SALE)I RESIDENT AIL CIONDO(SALE) RESIDENTIAL CIONDO(APTS) RESIDENT AIL CIONDO(APTS) COMMERCIAL CONDO(RENTAL) COMMERCIAL CONDO 1 CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF UNITOWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNITOWNERS UNIT OWNERS OWNS I MAINTAINS: OWNS/MAINTAINS: OWNS/MAINTAINS: OWNS I MAINTAINS: OWNS/MAINTAINS: LIMITED COMMON AREAS LIMITED COMMON AREAS LIMITED COMMON AREAS LIMITED COMMON AREAS LIMITED COMMON AREAS OUTSIDE OF BLDG 6: OUTSIDE OF BLDG 4: OUTSIDE OF BLDG 3: OUTSIDE OF BLDG 2: OUTSIDE OF BLDG 1: Parking Lot @ Brewery Outside of Bldg(Studs Out) Outside of Bldg(Studs Out) Outside of Bldg(Studs Out) Outside of Bldg(Studs Out) Lease of Parking Lot @ Brewery Exterior Windows Exterior Windows Exterior Windows Exterior Windows Outside of Bldg(Studs Out) Exterior Windows COMMON AREAS INSIDE COMMON AREAS INSIDE COMMON AREAS INSIDE COMMON AREAS INSIDE CONDO CONDO CONDO CONDO COMMON AREAS FOR CONDO: Elevator Assigned Parking In Lot(If Any) Entryway Locker Room I Showers l�u Lr1JrI/ l+P�)�ir lr� Lapp/ OWN I MAINTAINS: OWN/MAINTAINS: OWN I MAINTAINS: OWN I MAINTAINS: OWN/MAINTAINS: Interior Unit(Studs In) Interior 1l Unit(Studs In) Interior Unit(Studs In) Interior Unit(Studs In) Interior Unit(Studs In) �( BUILDING 5 COMMERCIAL CONDO (PUBLIC LSE) 11 See Master„ Owners Assoc. COTTOMWO®® ¢ [®A RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 57 0 GOVERNANCE MASTER OWNERSMembers are all owners within PUD ASSOCIATION BUILDING 6 RESIDENTIAL(SALE)I —LDING 3 BUILDING 2 ANG I COMMERCIAL CONDO JRENTAL) COMMERCIAL CONDO RESIDENTIAL CONDO(SALE� RESIDENTIAL CONDO(APTS) RESIDENTIAL CONDO(APTS� DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR A. N—.On—. 3 #2 #3 CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF CONDO ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS BUILDINGS COMMERCIAL CONDO' MANAGED BY MASTER 3 DIRECTORS PER CONDO ASSOCIATION(Elected By Unit Owners) ONE DIRECTOR PER BUILDING WILL ALSO BE A DIRECTOR OF MASTER OWNERS ASSOCIATION EACH OWNER WILL A MEMBER OF THE CONDO OWNERS ASSOCIATION&MASTERS OWNERS ASSOCIATIOFINANCE MASTER OWNERSMembers are all owners within PUD ASSOCIATION •�� BUILDING 4 BUILDING 6 RESIDENTIAL(SALE)I BUILDING 3 BUILDING 2 )ING 1 COMMERCIAL CONDO RENTAL) COMMERCIALCONDO RESIDENTIAL CONDO(SALE) RESIDENTIAL CONDO(APTS) RESIDENTIAL CONDO JAPTS) BUILDING S COMMERCIAL CONDO (PUBLIC USE) MANAGED BY MASTER ASSOCIATION OF ASSOCIATION OF ASSOCIATION OF ASSOCIATION OF ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT OWNERS UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT OWNERS OWNERS OWNERS OWNERS OWNERS UNIT OWNERS PAY FEE TO OWNERS ASSOC."(%Based On Unit Sq.Ft./Building Sq.) 'This fee includes fee for Master Owners Assoc. RES OWNERS ASSOC. PAY FEE TO MASTER ASSOC.(%Based On Bldg Sq Ft./All Building Sq.) ., RESUBMITAL11 JANUARY2019 ASSOCIATION DUTIES BEYOND MAINTENANCE ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES: MASTER Architectural Review OWNERS Common Parking Maintenance&Rules ASS• • Common Area Rules including but not limited to:Pavilion Use,Snow - Removal on Common Walkways,Signage on General Common, Storm Water Maintenance,Collection from Each Association, Maintenance of Sprinklers&Landscaping. Dispute Resolution Between Building Associations BUILDING 6 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 3 ING 2 BUILDING t (RENTAL) COMMERCIALC CONDO BUILD COMMERCIAL CONDORESIDENTIAL(SALE) CONDO(SALE) RESIDENTIAL CONDO(APTS) RESIDENTIAL CONDO(APTS) ONDO F— CONDO ASSOCIATIONOF rr ASSOCIATION OF • r• r • • • •• • • r•ASSOCIATION OF • • • UNIT OWNERS, ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES Interior Signage Interior Signage Interior Signage Interior Signage Interior Signage Collection From Members Collection From Members Collection From Members Collection From Members Collection From Members Member Dispute Resolution Member Dispute Resolution Member Dispute Resolution Member Dispute Resolution Member Dispute Resolution Parking Lease Exterior of Building 4: Exterior of Building 3: Exterior of Building 2: Exterior of Building is Exterior of Building 6: Landscaping(within X Feet) Landscaping(within X Feet) Landscaping(within X Feet) Landscaping(within X Feet) Landscaping(within X Feet) Clean-up(within X Feet) Cleanup(within X Feet) Clean-up(within X Feet) Clean-up(within X Feet) Clean-up(within X Feet) BUILDING 5 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES COMMERCIAL CONDO MAINTAINS: (PUBLIC USE) Common Areas,Including But Not Limited To: See Master Pavilion Owners Assoc. -• Landscaping Around Buildings • • Parking Garage I Areas(excl Bldg 6 parking) Storm Water Maintenance Common Area Trash Snow Removal From Entryway&Sidewalks BUILDING 4 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL CONDO(RENTAL) COMMERCIAL CONDO BUILDING6 RESIDENTIAL( RESIDENTIAL CONDO(SALE) RESIDENTIAL CONDO(APTS) RESIDENTIAL CONDO(APTS) SHARED DECK • ••ASSOCIATION OF • r•ASSOCIATION OF • ••ASSOCIATION• • •• • •• UNITOWNERS UNITOWNERS • - MAINTAINS BUILDING 6: MAINTAIN BUILDING 4: MAINTAIN BUILDING 3: MAINTAIN BUILDING 2: MAINTAIN BUILDING 1: Interior&Exterior Common Areas Interior&Exterior Common Areas Interior&Exterior Common Areas Interior&Exterior Common Areas Interior&Exterior Common Areas Ind But Not Limited To: Incl But Not Limited To: Ind But Not Limited To: Ind But Not Limited To: Incl But Not Limited To: Elevator Elevator Trash Room(share with Bldg 4) Common Walkway to Bldg 1 Elevator To Parking(share with Entryway Interior Corridor Mechanical Room Elevator To Parking(share with Bldg 1,2,3,4) Hallways Entry Lobbies(2) Elevator To Parking(share with Bldg 1,2,3,4) Trash Room(share with Bldg 2) Locker Room I Showers Trash Room(share with Bldg 3) Bldg 1,2.3,4) Trash Room(share with Bldg 1) Mailroom(share with Bldg 2) Parking Lease Area Mechanical Room Mailroom(share with Bldg 1) Entryway(share with Bldg 2,3,4) Mechanical Room Elevator To Parking(share with Entryway Mechanical Room Bldg 1,2.3,4) Mechanical Room Stairs Roof Top Area(share with Bldg 1) Bike Tuning Area(share with 2) Kitchen&Laundry Areas(limited common expense per Pod) OWNERS IIQW�11111111111111 RESPONSIBLE FOR: RESPONSIBLE FOR: RESPONSIBLE FOR: RESPONSIBLE FOR: RESPONSIBLE FOR: Interiors of Unit Interiors of Unit Interiors of Unit Interiors of Unit Interiors of Unit Patio Snow Removal Patio Snow Removal Patio Snow Removal Patio Snow Removal Patio Snow Removal Contribute Funds to ,?^ Contribute Funds to Contribute Funds to Contribute Funds to Contribute Funds to Association t �- A Association Association Association Association BUILDING 5 COMMERCIAL CONDO R (PUBLIC USE) •j See Master Owners Assoc. RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 59 • 0 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES FOR BUSINESSES The project contains three primary types of commercial spaces. The first is a more traditional office format in Building b, located at the Northwest corner of the site,where there are three levels of open-plan office.These spaces could be divided to host smaller tenants, however the intent is to lease the majority of the building to one or two primary tenants.The second type of commercial space is one we are classifying as 'maker spaces' in Building 4.These would be smaller spaces where creatives could maintain a studio to showcase their work, or where a digital start-up could find an affordable foothold. Third, there is an opportunity for a small scale cafe located in building 5 on the Plaza. This would likely be a place that provides small dining opportunities for the office and makers as well as residents throughout the day. Below is a matrix of spaces and uses, along with estimates of the number of employees. COMMERCIAL OFFICE EMPLOYEES 81 ARTISAN MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEES 6 GENERAL PROPERTY MANAGER 1 SMALL SCALE CAFE b TOTAL lEi RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPACT MITIGATION The Northeast Historic Mixed-Use(NEHMUI is unique within the City-constantly evolving to accommodate a rich variety of uses.The Cottonwood and Ida Mixed-Use project contains the residential and commercial uses currently allowed, and promotes diverse land-uses that remain sensitive to the neighborhood context. While apartment buildings are not specifically permitted in the district, residential units are allowed on the second and subsequent floors above commercial spaces. The zoning code further states that the "standards for buffering between different land uses are deliberately not as high as standards elsewhere in the community as it is assumed that persons choosing to locate in this area are aware of the variety of possible adjacent land uses and have accepted such possibilities as both acceptable and desirable."The project responds to existing conditions by placing denser commercial activity closer to the commercial office and shop spaces on surrounding blocks. Additionally, lower-scale residential units on the site (Building 3 Townhouse-style units) are located across the street from other single-family scaled residences. Other steps have been taken to reduce the overall mass and scale of this project by placing parking underground and, in place of surface parking, providing public open spaces to foster connections to the community. DESIGN METHODS TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION The site planning will be certified by the US Green Building Council as a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Neighborhood Development (LEED NO). The project is being planned, designed, engineered and constructed to yield a development that makes much more efficient use of land and resources than land-use patterns typical for the region - thus reducing overall energy consumption. In addition to the overall site planning, strategies will be employed in the individual buildings to reduce energy consumption and promote long-term sustainable practices across the project - including low- flow plumbing fixtures, high-performance windows, energy efficient appliances, low-voltage lighting, and onsite recycling facilities. COTTOMWOOD ¢ BDfii RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 60 RATIONALE FOR CHOICES MADE BY THE APPLICANT From the early planning stages of the project we insisted that it contribute a solution for the shortage of affordable housing in Bozeman. Traditionally, more affordable housing has been pushed to the newer parts of town, with the older neighborhood becoming more and more gentrified. We see an opportunity to keep affordable housing options in the NEHMU District, taking advantage of the existing infrastructure and established neighborhoods surrounding the site. We also believe that the project needs to accommodate more than one demographic, and have included a broad range of unit types to promote a mix of age and income levels on the site. The project has also very intentionally approached the need to provide commercial uses in this mixed- use neighborhood so that there are opportunities for individuals to live close to where they may work. The hope is that both residents of the site and the surrounding neighborhood will be able to bike or walk to work. We have planned the site and the structures as a distinct micro-urban context, with individual residents living and working on-site, with inviting places for them to gather and enjoy the interactions of daily life. We have provided extensive public open spaces and landscaped courtyards to serve this purpose, and have intentionally created an open and accessible site. The unique aesthetic qualities of this district also compelled the project to respond in a unique manner, exploring architectural styles that respond to both the industrial and residential context. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 61 GENERAL SITE DATA B L� ;t - tJ ERG :.$F - __ ,' �': �' o � -�_��• �•, •.:.� DISTRIBUTOR , ",�• � I he Northeastern Neighborhood is host to d diver se,dctrve set of re5ide�eta, heavily invested in preserving their community's unique identity, and intent on engaging - �" ��*��t -•� HISTORIC �� . L . with projects as they develop in the area. � '.'-• '��". � TRAIL DEPOT ' Al In April 2017, the neighborhood hosted a Regional and Urban Design Assistance -" �. .� , •,x * � = - , Team (R/UDAT) workshop to gather community input on future development in the t NORTHERN Northeastern Neighborhood. The team's report provided a great deal of guidance � : PACIFIC as we established the project goals, developed a site strategy, and formulated the - - FORMER " x= F ' y ` RAILWAY TECH BREWERY =- relationships to the streets and surrounding properties. OFFICE SITE `, r ` t & IIQDlJSTRIALr • , }. Xs�" FROM THE R/UDAT REPORT 8S 1�� e ,R ' . _T- + POCKET '` 4 CHARACTER: "Tlie cuiiiriiuinty Iuld the team that the neighborhood i PARK funky.' The neighbor hood's clidi actor is authentic and unique in the131y c,uiitext of Bozeman It iS a real place. The community also put intense value on the eclectic identity of the area and its mix of uses- a quality that ASP S �, •_ " * :'? �n math is embi deed dnd celebrated The PJorthcost Neighborhood is al_ ,�, _'� r - - :�;, . �._, �• � _� up of ci cdhvc and artistic people who value its divPrsit y and freedom of �h self-expression. The neighborhood was widely described as livahle, hoth � A MF ' c for its adjacency to downtown and the quality of life it provides to the BREAKFAST who work and live here people STREETS: "One of the most widely shared ideas on future improvements �1 concerned the need to better connect existing assets throughout the - ' _ a�, x S neighborhood and make its streets more friendly to pedestrians and SINGLE-FAMILY .� SIRDG E-"NE ILY IF bicyclists." RE ENCE ,�� M r`• E i S DIVERSITY & AFFORDABILITY: **Two manifold interests emerged as • �, - _. i z "x� p ;� �"° N' important The first is the preservation and strengthening of the unique E. COTTONWOOD ST sense of place in the iieiyhborhood and its contributing components. The second characteristic is the accessible and affordable housing Q - _ I ( r - proposition th it has traditionally prevailed in the neighborhood, and the Sll�i LE FALdIL"�(- 1i' n"�wT. .!r ~:- Q� ' ~~ value that df for ddhilily has in producing a diverse ncighboihoorl that ran y S_� _ > CAF MULTI-FAMILY--' 5uppui t 1-1 LatfVC professionals and working fomitics. } �;' . '� W '� RESIDENTIAIt Ln^' LU - �- 5 MINUTE WALK (1/4 MILE) 10 MINUTE WALK (1/2 MILE) _ "I,, J .. 15 & OR • PARK TRAILS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • FAIRGROUNDS BOZEMAN CITY HALL OFFICES& • BIKE r OFiCE $t• BASEBALL FIELD • DOWNTOWN RETAIL DISTRICT STUDIO . SHOP a BAKERY STUDIOS S • CAFES 0 PUBLIC LIBRARY .1 •�_� f lrf r .- `-� - 1' f • BUS STOP 0 LINDLEY PARK E. PEACH ST. ,�. •� - � ,- - • OFFICES 0 BEALL PARK • ARTIST STUDIOS STORY MILL PARK ( *, ,fig• l '' • PUBLIC POOL 13/4 MILE) t T TQ' C:'!ir D�WN7l7WW1`I '{� SINGLE-FAM[l`Y - NOR RESIDE CES� r , ) D®TTOMWO®D 0 ODA - - ' RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 US DECO-T �''`' � page 62 00 a r CQ c7 � _� O FROM THE R/UDAT REPORT "The Core is the central portion of the R/UDAT project area and is an eclectic mix Of light industrial buildings intermingled with small cottages, walking w paths and historic sites The look and feel of the core is central to how the - .�5 _ - resident S see themselves. Developing a strategy for defining and prutecting the Core is essential to maintaining the residents cultural connection to the tir;,THWESTTOGALLATINPEAK %ORTrWESTTOMTBA,DY city s history as well as their neighborhood identity as a funky, creative, and di\,erse place to live, work and play- SITE CONDITIONS �� �— / ' c 00 - oa, The blocks to the East and West of the site are predominantly single-family residential, oo°�° while the blocks to the North and South consist of larger-scale industrial buildings, �� f { � ° r i coo 4 as well as small multi-family development. Immediately to the West of the site is the ` ~i� �t °°00� " C� historic Misco Mill (now housing a high-end furniture maker) and small collection of co �o° industrial buildings - currently being used as a pottery studio. �. ~ t °°° °°°° �� o°°° The East Aspen St. Right of way - to the North of the site - is currently closed to ° 00 o �� °o° ; ��• t traffic, and provides an open green space with benches and a walking trail. There are �°o°°° no sidewalks around the street edges of the site, but there are potential pedestrian �� ��`` •: connections across Cottonwood Street to the nearby cafe and bakery. Downtown is 3/4 of a mile South as well, providing relatively direct pedestrian and biking „• �� - ° &APARTMENTSUILD connections. Outdoor recreation areas to the North and Northeast of Bozeman are " 0 ° ELATE TO ADJACENTCOM also readily accessible. • ' ° &I USTRIAL SC o ° The lower levels of the project will offer views to the Northeast and Southeast. Upper '� Y °o° floors gain views across Bozeman to the Southwest, and up the Gallatin River Valley o° to the Northwest. o°pOOO°°° The site design responds to the variety of scales and land-use on adjacent properties ' by placing smaller-scale townhouse-style units across from the single-family neighbors to the East, while the larger masses of the office building and apartment TOWNH S - U� %/ building sit closer to the large industrial and warehouse buildings to the North. � ' / �t RE LAe ADJACENT` �••� 00 V �IN Buildings along Cottonwood conform to the scale and character of the recent multi- i/ , ', C RED TIALSCi4LE •' •' :� �� i •. falrtily devel0pnT1ents to [lie South of the site. Pedestrian connections and through-block passages occur on the South and / / 0 y Northeastern portions of the site while the vehicle traffic is directed Northwest toCIO * �' •�•• ••' ' Wallace Avenue. �. o° r J N. •••••••••• PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION �, �O - %• � `` % •'• •••••••••• PROPOSED VEHICLE CONNECTION) �r , `� 0 •_ v ••.� '1, i�.• ALLEYWAY ALIGNMENT / i ' • VIEW SHEDS t f s� •+•'•• •••••• � �` ASPEN STREET R.O.W. % • • PRESERVE EXISTING BUILDING �J� 1411 r. 'AERIAL FROM THE SOUTHEAST RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 .00-- ••• �. _ SOS THEAST'0 VT BLAC MORE page 63 SECTION 4 LAND USE 4.00 CITY LAND USE POLICIES & OBJECTIVES ACHIEVED 4.01 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION 4.02 ALIGNMENT OF GOALS WITH NORTHEAST URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT PLAN 4.03 ALIGNMENT OF GOALS .=ROM VISION NE/RUDAT REPORT COTTONWOOD + IDA RE'SPGNSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 04 • • CITY LAND USE POLICIES & OBJECTIVES ACHIEVED This infill, affordable housing, mixed use, urban plaza project exceeds many of the goals and objectives the City has across multiple planning documents from the Community Plan, Design Objectives Plan. Northeast Urban Renewal Plan, and the Economic Development Strategic Plan. Additionally, the design tearr and the developer facilitated an additional series of public meetings and charettes that further reinforced th= goat=_ of the project. (The RUDAT) the following covers the high-level items from the Bozeman Community Plar that are not covered elsewhere in the application. We have also provided a matrix of the basic policies that we are meeting across multiple planning documents. LAND USE - A SENSE OF PLACE BOZEMAN COMMUNITY PLAN GOAL LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the city, efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people Live and work and minimizes sprawl. The Cottonwood and Ida project is best described as a mixed-use infill project providing for places of work and housing within the existing fabric of a neighborhood. By Creating opportunities for multiple demographics and varying the types of housing, this project will successfully combat t-)e pressures of sprawl. It is estimated that if this density of both commercial and residential uses were to develop under traditional greenfield development standards it would be nearly five times as consumptive of land. One of the objectives under this goal is: OBJECTIVE LU-1.4: Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing-development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design. The Cottonwood and Ida project provides this much needed density while respecting the context of the existing neighborhood by placing much of the parking below grade, breakirg up the buildings irto multiple structures that create broad public plazas and intimate courtyards for enjoyment by tl-e resident and t-)P visitor alike. QUALITY COMMUNITY ' GOAL C-1: Human Scale and Compatibility- Create a community composed of neighbcrhoods designed for the human scale and compatibility in which the streets and buildings are properly sized within their context, services and amenities are convenient,visually pleasing,and properly integrated. This project has placed great emphasis on the human scale and as ment oned above by breaking up tn=_ massing of the buildings to more similarly match the context of the neighborhood and creating public spaces has created a visually pleasing and properly integrated quality set of buildings and public spaces. GOAL C-5: Public Landscaping and Architecture- Enhance the urban appearance and environment with architectural excellence, landscaping,trees and open space. — OBJECTIVE C-5.2: Encourage inclusion of plazas and other urban design features as public areas within developments. JAN 28. 2619 rJ The Cottonwood and Ida project provides over 6,750 SF of public plaza sp thaQWlll' �ewice an ul oan pa <. experience unique to this neighborhood. G�OM1VIiJ(VI L ,::�ul COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 65 • • LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION / COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION The project area is designated as"Industrial" in the Community Plan.This classification provides areas for uses which support an urban environment such as manufacturing,warehousing,and transportation hubs. Development within these areas is intensive and is connected to significant transportation corridors. In some circumstances, uses other than those typically considered industrial have been historically present in areas which were given an industrial designation in this growth policy. Careful consideration must be given to public policies to allow these mixed uses to coexist in harmony. The property holds a unique identity within this context given that it is also part of the NEHMU Zoning Classification (see below). This classification has prcvided for a mix of residential uses and commercial/ industrial uses throughout its history. The project is compatible with this and will add to an ever-evolving future of this neighborhood. ZONING DESIGNATION Sec. 38.300.110. -Commercial and Mixed-use Zoning Districts- Intent and Purpose The intent and purposes of the commercial zoning districts are to establish areas within the City that are primarily commercial in character and to set forth certain minimum standards for development within those areas. Northeast Historic Mixed-Use District- Intent and Purpose. NEHMU 1. The intent of the Northeast Historic Mixed-use District is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses.The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses. Standards for buffering between different land uses are deliberately not as high as standards elsewhere in the community as it is assumed that persons choosing to locate in this area are aware of the variety of possible adjacent land uses and have accepted such possibilities as both acceptable and desirable. It is expected that the lots within this district will continue to develop under a variety of uses which may increase or decrease in scope in any given portion of the district. 2. The clear intent of this district is to support a mix and variety of non-residential and residential uses. Nothing in Division 38.300 of this Article shall be interpreted to be discouraging or prejudicial to any listed use except as set forth as principal and conditional uses. As stated above the unique aspects of this zone type make it very suitable for a mixed use commercial and residential project. The project respects this identity both in the planning of uses as well as the scale of the architecture. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 66 • • ALIGNMENT OF GOALS WITH NEURD (NORTHEAST URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT) PLAN THE NORTHEAST URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT MISSION AND VISION: -The plan envisions a mixed-use neighborhood that is user-friendly safe, secure and healthy. While the plan envisions a District with diversity of housing, businesses, and amenities, it intends to maintain the unique ambiance and historic character of the District." NEURD Plan pg. 5 We used this mission statement along with feedback from the RUDAT to develop our plan. We are seeking to create a neighborhood that is user-friendly, offering plaza spaces and good connectivity to the surrounding neighborhood. We are providing a healthy mix of housing, businesses and amenities that respond to the unique ambiance of the district through massing and scale and configuration of buildings. The NEURD plan outlines nine principles along with goals and implementation policies that it seeks to achieve through the creation of our project it addresses many of these principals, goals, and implementation policies aligned in the plan. In fact, our project directly addresses 7 of these principals. Specifically, Principle 1 is to ensure health safety and security of the District by upd2ting outdated or insufficient infrastructure. We intend to make improvements to the surrounding street network and utilities in collaboration with the District. This project also furthers the goal of a land use pattern that facilitates all modes of transportation. We have included substantial underground parking to provide the needed parking while shielding the presence of"parking lots"from the neighborhood viewshed. We have provided plazas and greenways to facilitate public pedestrian uses on the site and Atend to create specific bike garage facilities to accommodate bike parking, storage, and maintenance areas. Principle 2 speaks to the desire to balance commerce and livability in the 3istrict within the mixed-use framework. Our project provides this balance and compatibility through the very best practices of urban design. We achieve this by providing good connections to public spaces for 3I1 that improve quality of life for the residents and business owners alike. Principle 3 is to 'honor the unique character and vitality of the District' We have taken great effort to include opportunities within this project for affordable and attainable housing, unique artist spaces and commercial uses that best fit the emerging character of the District Additionally, our thoughtful consideration of mass and scale, attention to public values, and sustainable building practices will both honor the vitality and show a path forward that the district can truly be proud of. Principle 4 addresses the need for public open space that contributes to the health and appeal of the urban environment. This project creates over 20,000 SF of multiple public open spaces and provides improvements to adjacent greenways. Principle 5 establishes the framework to evaluate the cost of projects and programs weighted against their benefits to the district. This project provides the much-needed benefit of affordable housing and unique artists spaces in a progressive urban design that will enhance and preserve the unique character of the District. The project will also substantially increase the available increment in the District which can be used to achieve additional goals outlined in the plan [continued] COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 page 67 • • ALIGNMENT OF GOALS WITH NEURD PLAN (NORTHEAST URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT) CONTINUED We have estimated this at $100,000 annually, after debt service, that can be used on other projects within the District. This principal exemplifies our project in so far that it will promote the principals and goals of the District and contribute significantly to the underlying value of the District. Principle 6 states the private land shall not be acquired for private use through the eminent domain process. Our project does not use any eminent domain in the redevelopment. We do offer our own private land to the public in the form of public plazas. Principle 7 states that projects shall consider impacts on adjacent neighborhoods. Our project has thoughtfully addressed the surrounding neighborhood by incorpor9ting smaller scale housing next to smaller scale adjacent homes and placed more commercially oriented uses next to existing commercial uses. ESSENTIAL GOALS OF THE 2006 NEURD PLAN ACHIEVED • "Outdated or insufficient infrastructure should be repaired, replaced, or otherwise improved" [Principle 1,pg.5 NEURD Plan) • 'Assure compatibility of land use through appropriate urban design techniques"[Principle 2,pg.6 NEURD Plan) • "Promote sustainable building practice and design within the District"[Principle 3, pg. 7 NEURD Plan] • "Encourage affordable housing"[Principle 2,pg. 6 NEURD Plan] • "Secure public open spaces in locations that will optimize accessibility"(Principle 4, pg.7 NEURD Plan) • "New structures should be designed keeping in mind public values of durability, flexibility, and simplicity. Thoughtful consideration of design, materials, and massing in construction of new private buildings will add strength and character to the built environment. To the degree that private sector can be influenced by a public partner in development, the community ought to strongly encourage excellence in urban design as a basis of partnership."[Principle 3,pg.7 NEURD Plan) • "Harmonize commercial and industrial development with residential quality of life"[Principle 2, pg. 6 NEURD Plan) COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 68 ALIGNMENT OF GOALS FROM THE VISION NE/RUDAT REPORT (NORTHEAST REGIONAL URBAN DESIGN ASSISTANCE TEAM) While not an adopted city policy document the RUDAT provided an opportunity for a broad base of neighborhood and community engagement discussing the future direction of this District and areas surrounding it. The RUDAT came up with a few guiding principles as follows: • Values the neighborhood's unique vibrancy, diversity, artistry, history, commercial / industrial interface, walk- and bike - ability, and special bridger mountain views; • Understand that growth and change in our neighborhood is inevitable; • Embraces the notation that change can be positive, that it can enhance the neighborhood's unique character and vitality and increase opportunities for affordable housing, connectivity and civic participation. The goals of the Cottonwood and Ida project very much align with these as we endeavor to create affordable housing opportunities and embrace the artistry and history of the District while making opportunities for civic participation on site. THE VISION NE/RUDAT FOLLOW-UP COMMITEE SEEKS TO: • Enhance neighborhood character We are looking to enhance the character through unique buildings and public spaces and provide commercial opportunities for artists to continue to contribute to the fabric of place. • Create new pocket parks, urban rooms and public gathering spaces We have incorporated several public plaza spaces and pocket parks within the site to support public gathering and invite the neighborhood to be part of the location as we ask to be part of the neighborhood. • Provide safe transportation through residential neighborhoods The project provides full pedestrian circulation through the site connecting to the existing sidewalk and trail network. Transportation patterns have been considered to keep most of the traffic on existing major roadways. • Support artists and artisans and provide opportunities for public art From the beginning our intent is to support and provide opportunity for the burgeoning artist community to flourish by adding additional artist spaces, as well as affordable places for artists to live and incorporate within the public spaces art. • Expand the trail network and connectivity to downtown Bozeman,the North 7th Corridor,and Story Mill Community Park This project creates a through pathway and can become a hub of connection to the various sub districts. • Consider the area's agricultural and light industrial historical legacy The character of the buildings will incorporate attributes that pay homage to the legacy of the various historical uses. • Provide affordable housing options Lastly- we are providing both affordable housing and attainable housing through a mix of unit types to support the unique character of the neighborhood. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 69 • • SECTION 5 INFRASTRUCTURE 5.00 INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES&SUMMARIES 5.01 WATER RIGHTS CASH-IN-LIEU TABLE WATER WELL PROPOSED FOR I.RRIGATLON CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN COTTOMWOOD ¢ I®A RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 70 • 0 INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES & SUMMARIES CONTINUED SITE ACCESSIBILITY BELOW-GRADE PARKING GARAGE Two of the residential buildings, the office building, and a portion c` the public open space 3re constructed over a parking garage. 96 Parking spaces Entry & exit to the parking garage is from Aspen Street in order to direct traffic to Wa.lace "-✓errue, and reduce traffic impacts on Cottonwood Street and Ida Avenue. EAST ASPEN STREET The entire right-of-way adjacent to the property is currently undevelo:)ec.The proposal is tc,c,,�rstr,-,ct a roadway,with sidewalk and other street improvements along the north and south side of t;e righ=- of-way. In addition to the parking garage entry, the street will accommodate several parallel p3rling spaces, and a loading zone. EAST COTTONWOOD STREET The Northern half of the right-of-way adjacent to the project site will ae improved. The irtention is for the proposed improvements to match the character of recent improvements directly across h= street -with sidewalk, street trees, and diagonal parking. NORTH IDAAVENUE The right-of-way adjacent to the project site will be improved with sidewalk, street tr?rs, curb, and parallel parking. Improvements will continue East across the Id,= right-of-way up t3. Sul -i--t including, the opposite curb. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The 20'fire lane will serve as a through-block pedestrian connection between the active i:_:torwood- Wallace Intersection, and the open green space at Aspen Street. PUBLIC OPEN SPACES The main open space on the site takes advantage of the distinctive Misco Mill and tie -.-IIDv3:ed on-site building to create a plaza suitable for hosting food vendors, farmer's markets, F-ld sim:lar community events; as well as daily informal use by the office tenants, residents, a-d Er6sa-i community. Public services, such as event storage and restrooms will be located in the -=_nI3va.ed building at the Southwest corner of the site. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 20'9 page 71 PARKING The parking demand will be met primarily by the 96 space parking garage located partially below-grade across most of the site. With nearby bus stops, and downtown within easy walking and biking distance,we are able to provide residents and tenants with a community that is less reliant on their cars for daily commuting and errands. With ample on-site bike parking facilities, and a modest investment in carshare services, the reduced demand for parking is crucial to creating a more attainable - and more diverse - set of housing options. There will be accessible path of travel to commercial parking lot at Wallace&Aspen street. @Ua � %� &UM [�, ij)� COUNTS 38 36 18 92 CURRENT CODE RATIO 1.25 1.5 2 137.5 PROPOSED REDUCTION RATIO 1 1.25 2 119.0 BIKE PARKING CODE 14 PROVIDED 100(MIN) BUILDING 4 3,591 PRIMARILY OFFICE 250 14.36 BUILDING 5 1.200 RESTAURANT(INDOOR) 50 24.00 700 RESTAURANT(OUTDOOR) 100 7.00 BUILDING 6 20,127 PRIMARILY OFFICE 250 80.51 16 COVERED BIKE AND -10% 18.051 LOCKERS CURRENT CODE 117.8 PROPOSED PER PUD 40% 70.7 REDUCTION ON SITE PARKING GARAGE 96 PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL OFF SITE LEASE 72 FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL USE WITHIN 800 FEET OF ENTRANCE(S) ON STREET 32 COUNTED TOWARD RESIDENTIAL ONLY COVERED BIKE PARKING 88 ON SITE BIKE PARKING 50 TOTAL BIKE PARKING 138 TOTAL PROVIDED 200 TOTAL PER PUD REQUESTS 190 RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 72 0 0 INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES & SUMMARIES CONTINUED FIRE PROTECTION Buildings 1 and 6 will have floors and/or roof decks at least 30 feet above the adjacent road where fire equipment will have access. We are proposing standpipe systems in the exit stairs at the North end of each of these buildings. All of the buildings and the below-grade parking garage will be fully-sprinklered per NFPA-13, with the exception of the single-story open-air existing building (building 5). The site is surrounded by public right of way on the North, South and East sides. The West side of the site will be maintained as a 20 feet wide fire equipment access route. Each side of the project will have at least one direct and readily accessible access point from the street or on-site fire access route onto the top of the parking garage,which functions as the ground floor for each of the buildings. SOLID WASTE COLLECTION A Trash room A serves the 64 studio and one-bedroom apartments in buildings 1 and 2. The 34 units on the upper floors have access to trash and recycling chutes that terminate in a trash room at street level. The trash chute will have a compactor, while the recycling chute will feed directly into a dumpster. The trash room is 300 sf (18 feet x 17 feet), and can accommodate up to four 4-yard dumpsters, roughly 6 feel x 4 feet each, including the two at the chutes.Building staff will use a pallet jack to move the dumpsters from the trash room to Aspen Street for pick-up, and will place them back in the trash room once they've been emptied. The 18 units on the ground floor will use a separate small trash room with four standard curbside bins. Those b ns will be set out and retrieved by building staff. B Trash room B serves the 28 one- and two-bedroom units in buildings 3 and 4, as well as the commercial spaces in building 4. Residents and commercial tenants will place their trash and recycling into standard curbside bins. The bins wit( be put out and retreived by building staff. The trash room is 290 sf(21 feet x 14 feet) and is able to accommodate two 4-yard dumpsters for the commercial tenants, and six curbside bins for the residential tenants. Building staff will place the dumpsters and bins at Cottonwood Street for collection, and return them to the trash room when they've been emptied. C Trash room C serves the office building (building 61, with up to 90 employees. Janitorial staff will collect trash and recycling from the offices, and place it in dumpsters and/or curbside bins. The dumpsters and/or bins will be put out and retreived by building staff. The trash room is 280 sf (15 feet x 19 feet), and able to accommodate up to four 4-yard dumpsters, roughly 6 feet x 4 feet each. D Trash room D serves building 5 and cafe staff will collect trash and recycling and place it in a dumpster or =urb side bins. The bins/dumpster will be out by staff and retrieved by staff.The trash enclosure is "0 feet x 10 feet and able to accomodate a four yard dumpster and recycling bin. COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 73 WATER RIGHTS CASH-IN-LIEU TABLE ISM APARTMENT UNITS -- 92 -- 0.124 3,717,308 11.31 RESTAURANT 2,175 -- 165.000 -- 358,875 1.10 ARTISAN MANUFACTURING 4,500 165,000 742,500 2.28 (ASSUMED RESTAURANT] OFFICE 28.700 10,000 287,000 0.88 IRRIGATION N/A(EXEMPT WELL FOR IRRIGATION WATER) TOTAL 15.67 LESS CILWR CREDIT FROM 0.00 LESS HISTORICAL ANNUAL AVG METERED USE -0.07 NET VOLUME FOR CILWR 15.60 FINAL CILWR FEE-18516 COTTONWOOD+IDA PUD fd$6,000/AF $93,593.00 WATER WELL PROPOSED FOR IRRIGATION An existing well, located approximately in the Northeast corner of the project area, is proposed to be used for landscaping irrigation. We have had discussions with the department of natural resources and conservation and we understand that, as the project progresses, this use of the existing well is contingent upon providing proof of water rights. RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 74 • • CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN The Cottonwood & Ida project includes the construction of five new buildings and renovation of one existing building with mixed use of commercial, multi-family residential and office/retail. Two of the proposed buildings of which will be built on top of a podium above a parking garage. A courtyard/plaza, interior to the site, will be a publicly-accessible space. These buildings will be constructed in a single phase. Off-site infrastructure improvements will be necessary in conjunction with the aforementioned site improvements. The Developer proposes concurrent construction of off-site infrastructure improvements in order to satisfy the infrastructure needs of the project (water, sewer, storm drain and transportation) while progressing the construction of the on-site parking structure, buildings and appurtenances. It is anticipated that off-site sanitary sewer infrastructure will be the first public infrastructure element to be installed, as it is the deepest utility, on average. Storm drain and water infrastructure will follow, as well as widening the adjacent roads IAspen Street to the north, Ida Avenue to the west,and Cottonwood Street to the south) to the approved roadway sections, including widened travel lanes, parking spaces, curb and gutter, as well as landscaping boulevards and sidewalks. The anticipated construction durations for these off-site infrastructure improvements are as follows: SANITARY SEWER - To be determined following PUDP review STORM DRAIN - To be determined following PUDP review WATER - To be determined following PUDP review ROADWAY - To be determined following PUDP review ESTIMATED OVERALL COMPLETION DATE OF OFF-SITE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS - To be determined following PUDP review COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 page 75 0 • CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN CONTINUED It is also likely that additional parking facilities within the Front Street Right-of-Way will be constructed in conjunction with the proposed Cottonwood & Ida project—this will provide parking stalls within the ROW for the City's purposes adjacent and to the northeast of the existing Boulder Park which lies northeast of the on-site improvements. While the off-site infrastructure improvements are progressing in their installation, it is anticipated that the on-site improvements will be construction,with order and duration roughly as follows: 1. PARKING GARAGE CONSTRUCTION - To be determined following PUDP review 2. BUILDINGS 1 AND 2 - To be determined following PUDP review 3. BUILDING 6 - To be determined following PUDP review 4. BUILDING 3 - To be determined following PUDP review 5. BUILDING 4 - To be determined following PUDP review 6. EXISTING BUILDING 5 RENOVATIONS 7. SITE IMPROVEMENTS, OVERALL COMPLETION DATE OF ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS - To be determined following PUDP review The Developer understands the requirement that off-site infrastructure improvements must be designed, constructed, and installed per Bozeman City standards and specifications, and ultimately approved by the City of Bozeman prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. Additionally the Developer understands and witl comply with all parts of the BMC 38.270.030.D. JAN 2 8 2619 ,1 L Ut_i rtfl,�iiavi U COMMQNITY D_ E MiIAK^�t,lf COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 76 SECTION 6 BUILDING & DESIGN 6.00 BUILDING DESIGN OBJECTIVES 6.01 BUILDING STRATEGIES 6.02 BUILDING MATERIALS 6.03 DESIGN VIGNETTES RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 77 0 0 ��HN �U�� ���N���� ������K���� ���m��o���� ���m���� �����mm��� FROM THE, ..~., . ..� ../~~~~.. REPORT 'The ^xok and (ee| n( the core /s cec|-e( /osdpn4's see ikoxr­_phes and idpnjhwi(h the ne� hho � d D ! �� i b sf/ d nN h � � h i� maintaining /� , mo e`e npsge su eg[ ro nmgan p ec mg ns 'o,cuesser a z t�p ros/denJs* cuduoi connecUcr, to lthe db- �stmryasoeH as the!, neighborhood identity asa '/unky,* cxalxe. and d\veoe place to [^e. work and play." Drawing heavily from community input gathered during the R/UDAT workshop held in apri-, 2017, a number of design priorities have been identified: NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRATION The project wit( be responsive to the existing scale, massing. and Land uses in the surrounding neighborhood,and wiR build upon the eclectic and creative spirit valued bythe Northeast?rn rEighborhood residents. The majority of the parking will be placed in an underground garage to minimize its impact, and in promote a pedestrian oriented and bike-friendly community. DIVERSITY The site must provide a vide range of housing options for the resideois, and must -espect the community's desire to have housing that is affordable and attainable by micdle-income ocat resicents. The development must be truly mixed-use; bringing economic opportunities with new offices and maker spaces, housing options for residents of all walks of Ute, and much'neeced community amenities and open spaces. CHARACTER The design of the site and buildings will enhance the neighborhood; providing a contemporary tawe on materials and forms already present and familiar in nearby homes and bus:nesses. SUSTAINABUU ]TY The site will be developed to be environmentally, economically,and socially sustainable.We 3recurrently pursuing site-wide LEED Neighborhood Development Certification, and are committed |nzradics\ and progressive green building practices. The office space and workshops will offer new a-idexpanded opportunities for local businesses; white the community rooms, open spaces, and overall -tegrat on of residential, produchon, and business usesviU support vibrant, creative, and diverse community for years tocome. RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL11 || JANU/\RY2019 page7O • 0 BUIL®IMGSTRATEGIES NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRATION OUTDOOR ROOMS • Respect the variety of building sizes and forms • Provide outdocr rooms of different sizes to in the neighborhood, and offer a similar variety accommodate 3 variety of uses - from small in the design of the individual buildings, and groups to large-public events portions of building • Screen the edges of the outdoor spaces to • Design the ground floor of all buildings with preserve privacy within the nearby residences a pedestrian scale - residential stoops, main . Respond to the solar orientation of our open street storefronts, sheltered entries, inviting spaces - offer shade in the summer, and sun in lobbies the winter CHARACTER MATERIALS • Design each building to be distinctive while maintaining a coherent and cohesive project • Select materials that evoke the industrial aesthetic heritage of the site, yet are appropriate for residential uses, and result in durable and • Develop individual details that respect the value sustainable structures that the community places on its own eclectic and creative culture NIP 10 74 al ,' .70 ;, -1 15, JN �•� ',K.��• ��.'tr �\k'_ �� i h!f C\ i^��-ate _ AERIAL LOOKING NORTHWEST RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II I I JANUARY 2019 page 79 • • BUILDING MATERIALS Exterior materials have been selected in order to reference the residential and industrial buildings found throughout the Northeastern neighborhood. The materials will be durable, with consideration given to reducing maintenance costs for the residents where feasible. Primary exterior wall surfaces will be faced in panel siding, and both corrugated and standing seam metal siding;while ground floor access points that are protected from the elements - entryways, stoops, storefronts, etc. - Will have wood siding. Railings, sunshades,fences,and similarly scaled items are still being designed but may consist of wood,steel frames, and/or perforated corrugated metal. Exterior materials include the following: • Wood Siding • Panel Siding • Standing Seam Metal Roof and Siding • Horizontal and Vertical Sun Shades • Horizontal and Vertical Corrugated Metal Siding 1 4• v 'M WOOD SIDING PANEL SIDING STANDING SEAM HORIZONTAL AND CORRUGATED METAL ROOFING VERTICAL SUN METAL SIDING AND SIDING SHADES COTTOMWOO® ¢ I®A RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 80 0 DESIGN z � l�l 1� ��ltlu► COTTONWOOD 11 1 THE CENTRAL COURTYARD A � ASPEN STREET ~� r •r r� �• r •��� ���� t , `,.it �� ��� � a T( L r14��1��•�j,' i COTTONWOOD 1 i page 81 • • STREET EDGE DESIGN The perimeter of the site, and the adjacent right-of-way improvements will provide safe, pedestrian routes, landscaped with street trees and sidewalk planting; and activated with workshop spaces, residential stoops, and welcoming lobbies. a ' 'oil 1 i dl� COTTONWOOD STREET r IDA AVE NUE TOWNHOUSE-STYLE UNITS RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 82 LIC R 51. 1C t pwitl of riet So f'the`se a roof o k hop,and dog wash,will be used only by-to esid and the��tive cottonwood frontage will be shared with the surroundin o m iKemufdoorw sible open spaces offer pedestrian paths through the site as well, providing a space for street life to weave its way through the block. A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES In order to serve a diverse group of residents, the project will provide a broad range of housing types. The individual buildings will host specific apartment types that will attract different demographic groups, while the community facilities will provide social _ spaces for them to mix. At the same time, the provision of maker and office spaces will allow for the convenience of a live-work lifestyle. - BUILDING 1 will contain studio and 1-bedroom apartments-. The building will also accommodate , most of the resident amenity spaces: roof deck, package room, bike workshop, dog wash, etc. BUILDING 2 will be dedicated to smaller studios. — These "micro-units" will be provided with generous common kitchens, living rooms, home office spaces, and dining rooms to encourage community. BUILDING 3 will be divided into modest 1-bedroom flats and family-size 2-bedroom townhouse-style units. BUILDING 4 will make up the most urban edge of the project, and consist of ground floor 1-bedroom flats behind the makerspace workshops. The units on level 2 and 3 will be 1- and 2-bedroom townhouse /loft units. r� � o � a1ea'w'73M 4.d , — A COTTONWOOD ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 83 SECTION 7 SIGNAGE 7.00 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN COYYOMWOO® ¢ I®A RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2010 page 84 • 0 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN The following information and accompanying drawings are to provide allowable areas per building along with location of proposed signs to the extent possible given the current extent of building design and possible tenants uses. Permitted sign areas are given for at( buildings. The construction type, graphics and lighting design styles are covered below: GENERAL SIGNAGE GUIDELINES General building and tenant signage limitations are described below and in the attached comprehensive sign plan drawings. The following are general criteria. • Prior to any fabrication of any sign, a sign permit must be obtained by the City of Bozeman. All signs and sign lighting must comply with the City of Bozeman Unified Development Code requirements and with this comprehensive sign plan • The following sign materials are encouraged • Wood Metal • Frosted glass • Acrylic sheet in appropriate colors and limited quantity • Signs are encouraged to be constructed three dimensionally and not solely flat painted surfaces. PERMITTED SIGN TYPES The following sign types are permitted for the Cottonwood and Ida project • Blade signs • Projecting blade signs that address pedestrian users are highly encouraged • Blade signs shalt be integrated into the building facade design both in placement and materiality • Blade sign dimensions are governed by the City Sign Code Internally tit blade signs are not permitted • Wall signs • Wall signs shall have a three-dimensional quality to them with either raised letters or cut-outs providing a reveal from the surface that it is attached to • All fasteners are encouraged to be hidden where possible • Back lit signs are permitted on wall signs • Signs lit from the front face are not permitted • Temporary free-standing signs • Temporary signage may be place outside of the tenant space and at plaza entries during tenant hours and is encouraged • Temporary freestanding signs must be placed as to not impede pedestrian traffic • Signs not permitted In addition to signs not permitted by the City of Bozeman Unified Development Code,the following sign types are not permitted. Exposed or surface mounted box or cabinet style signs • Signs which are not professional in appearance 'n 1-9 COTTONWOOD + °L "'s"`' * I1MUNIIY°EiIEL 'f�(41ChJ f RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY page 85 0 • COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN CONTINUED PROPOSED SIGNS Sign quantities, locations and types are subject to change and the tenant space sign allocations are subject to change. Any adjustment to the sign quantities will not result in signs in excess of the total amount allowed per the building. • General site signs allowed per 38.560.050 signs exempt from permit On premise directional signs not exceeding 4 sf in area and 5 feet in height • Lot 1:4 directional signs per above-location TBD • Lot 2:4 directional signs per above-location TBD • Lot 3:4 directional signs per above-location TBD • Lot 4:4 directional signs per above-location TBD • Building 1 -Residential Building Identifier Total signage allowable 8 sf • Signs proposed: Wall sign 8 sf • Building 2-Residential Building Identifier Total signage allowable 8 sf per frontage • Signs proposed: Wall sign 8 sf-along Ida Avenue Walt sign 8 sf-along Aspen Street • Building 3-Residential Building Identifier Total signage allowab.e 8 sf per street frontage • Signs proposed: Wall sign 4 sf;along Ida Avenue Wall sign 4 sf- along Cottonwood Street • Building 4 • Total signage allowab.e 8 Sf-Residenlia:Building Identifier 250 Sf total-all zommerciat spaces maximum • Signs proposed: Wall sign 8 sf-Residential Identifier along Cottonwood Street General buildi.-ig signage reserved 40 sf allowed/0 proposed Tenant space 50 sf allowed/two 8 sf projection signs proposed Tenant space 2::30 sf allowed/8 sf projection sign proposed Tenant space 3::30 sf allowed/8 sf projection sign proposed Tenant space a:30 sf allowed/8 sf projection sign proposed Tenant space 5::30 sf allowed/8 sf projection sign proposed Tenant space o::30 sf allowed/8 sf projection sign proposed COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 86 • 0 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN CONTINUED PROPOSED SIGNS Sign quantities, locations and types are subject to change and the t=--ant space sign allocation are subject to change. Any adjustment to the sign quantities will not result in signs in excess of the total amount allowed per the building. • Building 5 Total signage allowable 82.5 Sf • Signs propcsed: Wall s gn 72 sf • Building 6 Total signage allowable 159 sf • Signs propcsed: General building wall signs 4 at 10 sf each 140 sf) Tenant roster signs 3 at 16 sf each(48 sf) Level 1 tenant allowance 24 sf Level 2 tenant allowance 24 sf Level 3 tenant allowance 24 sf Total signage proposed with allowances 156 sf COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE&RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 87 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN ELEVATIONS RE S.GE'NT,AL BUILDING 'DENTIFiER8SF RE.SIDENT,Al-Bu!LDitvG IDENTIFIER 4 SF i - t S-ON 36 Sf J � �'�i' LF----L � � CIO' EL, � :I 0 - '_ I• I I PRC iE-T+NG S:GN5 VAX R SF SITE ELEVATION-SOUTH(COTTONWOOD) v1s•=r-0- PROJECTING SIGNS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING MAX 8 SF DE.NTIFIER 8 SF r � a I �_; I -= = 8 11 79 El 9 9 -71 I 7 LT L_ - - SITE ELEVATION-EAST(IDA) vi 6-=r-0° (C0770mvV0013 ¢ ODA RESPONSE& RESUBMIJAL II II JANUAHY 2019 page 88 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN ELEVATIONS CONTINUED 71,.%VP E� GENERAL B'JIL DING AL SC PLACE'-AT ALL F-BL CENTIF ER IJSF EACH ENTRIES SCI. TH EAS' 'ESP FACADE E ACH ACDI'IONA, D, I I IT -7 FTT - _ 4 f I I tC iE N' .. E: .C+rv'• Rt v' A Et. _` N'_ 'iti.a>\,'�,�5'EF aSF SITE ELEVATION-NORTH(ASPEN) ins.=r-o' L ! 5 i I SITE ELEVATION-WEST(MISCO MILL) vas'_�-o• RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 page 89 a SECTION 8 APPENDICES A PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE B TITLE REPORT C GEOTECH REPORT D WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN E TRAFFIC STUDY F SEWER AND WATER FLOW CAPACITIES G WELL LOG REPORTS H AGENCY LETTERS IF ANY I MAILING LIST OFADJOINERS J PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS K LEED DOCUMENTS L CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS 007 0=313 ¢ ROA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 FS ND �1 S A N D E R S 0 N %V7f February 12,2019 S T E W A R T Mr. Erik Nelson Imperial Development LLC 33 N. Black Ave. Bozeman,MT 59715 Memo: Combined Stormwater Detention Facilities—Shared facility,easement, calculations Cottonwood&Ida Mixed-Use Development Bozeman,Montana Dear Erik, The Cottonwood&Ida project proposes to construct a subsurface chamber system that will be vertically situation between above the high groundwater level and beneath the proposed grade of the finished surface. This subsurface chamber system will provide stormwater detention storage volume for both the on-site stormwater runoff as well as the off-site (public right-of-way) stormwater runoff for the Aspen Street roadway located north of the subject site. Based on our meeting with Griffin Nielsen on 2/11/19 in the City offices, I have provided the following calculations as a general overview of the design intent of accommodating both public and private stormwater detention volumes in the proposed stormwater system. This letter supplements the "Private Utilities Plan," sheet C1.2 showing how the communications, fiber, telephone,sewer, water, storm drain,power and gas utilities interface with each other. Public,as well as private,utility easements are also diagrammatically shown on this sheet. Rational Method Stormvater Calculations Stormwater calculations have been performed based on the City of Bozeman design storm/stormwater design manual. These calculations are separated by on-site improvements and off-site (public right-of-way) improvements—that is to say,additional impervious surface as a result of the proposed development. Results of Rational Method Calculations 0 Pre-development conditions were assumed to mean"greenfield" conditions—that is to say,open field/native conditions prior to what currently exists on site (warehouse buildings,pavement, concrete,rooftops,etc. This is a conservative pre-development condition because this site has experienced runoff with the hardscape improvements that are extent throughout the site for several decades. The pre-development runoff under these assumed conditions is: Pre-Development Peak Runoff Flow= 0.17 cfs/acre To Plan and Design Enduring Communities... www.sa n d e rso n stewa rt.co m Mr. Erik Nelson February 7,2019 We compared this pre-development runoff and restricted our allowable discharge from the combined public/private stormwater detention system to this flow. We assigned this conservative pre-development peak runoff flow restriction to both the private (site) stormwater detention as well as the public (off-site public right-of-way) stormwater detention. The resulting necessary detention volumes were thus: Private/site detention volume requirement= 4,615 cubic feet Public/Aspen Street detention volume requirement = 286 cubic feet Combined private/public detention volume requirement = 4,901 cubic feet Designed/programmed detention volume = 7,000 cubic feet(see below) Proposed Stormwater System As this stage of the design is preliminary in nature and this document is being produced in conjunction with the Preliminary Planned Unit Development(PUDP) application,we have conservatively programmed and designed for 7,000 cubic feet of storage volume by utilizing a subsurface chamber system that occupies the area of the Emergency Vehicle Access along the western extents of the site. For purposes of the PUDP submittal, this should satisfy the City's need to adequately plan for the development as well as the adjoining roadway and the corresponding increases of stormwater runoff. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerel , Mike Russell,PE,MBA Project Manager, Senior Engineer mrusseU@sandersonstewart.com Sanderson Stewart Attachments: Stormwater Calculations 2 Project:Cottonwood Ida Mixed Use Development Project 2 S A N D E R S O N % � Date:l/9/2019 2019 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS S T E WA R T Pre-Development Runoff'Volume (for on-site drainage) Design Storm Frequency= 10 years Discharge Rate,d= 0.00 cfs Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Runoff Frequency Calculation Area rea Coefficient Factor Value A [A/:(43W felaae) C Cf C x Cf C' C'x A Surface T e (ft) cres =(C x Q<or=t Acres Gravel 0 0.000 0.7 1 0.70 0.70 0.000 Rooftop 0 0.000 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.000 Concrete 0 0.000 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.000 Open Land(assumed greenfield) 90169 2.070 0.2 1 0.20 0.20 0.414 Asphalt 0 0.000 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.000 Totals 90169 2.07 0.414 Weighted Runoff Coefficient,Cud - SCiAi -- - 0.2000 /�"wd x Cf= 0.20 SA, Cwd x Cf x SAi= 0.41 Where Ci is the adjusted runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j A=rrr2 Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Site Detention Peak Flow Duration,t Intensity,i =C"x SAi x i x t =d x t =RmoQ Vohme-Discharge Volume =Cwd x SAi x i (m'n) (ft'�S) 1 9.16 227.58 0.00 227.58 3.79 5 3.22 399.73 0.00 399.73 1.33 10 2.05 509.48 0.00 509.48 0.85 15 1.58 587.17 0.00 587.17 0.65 20 1.31 649.37 0.00 649.37 0.54 25 1.13 702.12 0.00 702.12 0.47 30 1.00 748.38 0.00 748.38 0.42 35 0.91 789.87 0.00 789.87 0.38 40 0.83 827.66 0.00 827.66 0.34 45 0.77 862.49 0.00 862.49 0.32 50 0.72 894.89 0.00 894.89 0.30 55 0.68 925.25 0.00 925.25 0.28 60 0.64 953.86 0.00 953.86 0.26 75 0.55 1031.34 0.00 1031.34 0.23 90 0.49 1099.30 0.00 1099.30 0.20 105 0.44 1160.24 0.00 1160.24 0.18 120 0.41 1215.75 0.00 1215.75 0.17 150 0.35 1314.50 0.00 1314.50 0.15 180 0.31 1401.12 0.00 1401.12 0.13 360 0.20 1785.81 0.00 1785.81 0.08 720 0.13 2276.13 0.00 2276.13 0.05 1440 0.08 2901.06 0.00 2901.06 1,215.75 f? 0.17 (ft'/s) Project:Cottonwood Ida Mixed Use Development Project 2 S A N D E R S O N 600 Date:l/9/2019 2019 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS S T E WA R T Post-Development Increase in Impervious Cover(for on-site improvements) Design Storm Frequency= 10 years Allowable Discharge Rate,d= 0.17 cfs Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Runoff Frequency Calculation Area Area Coefficient Factor Value A A/(43560 e'/acre) C Cr C x Cr C' C'x A Surface Type (f6 Acres =1C=Q<or=t Acres Gravel 0 0.000 0.7 1 0.70 0.70 0.000 Rooftop 39541 0.933 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.886 Concrete 39541 0.908 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.862 Grass,Landscaping,Field 4000 0.092 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 0.023 Asphalt 6000 0.138 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.131 Totals 89082 2.0700 1.9022 Weighted Runoff Coefficient,(:wd _ SCjAi 0.9189 Cwd x CF= 0.92 SAi Cad x Cf x SAi= 1.90 Where Ci is the adjusted runoff coefficient for surface type j and Ai is the area of surface type j A=m2 Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Site Detention Peak Flow Duration,t Intensity,i =C- a SA_i=t =d x t =Runoff Voh=e-3Discharge Volume =Cwd a SAl a i (min) 1 9.16 1045.66 10.13 1035.53 17.43 5 3.22 1836.67 50.66 1786.01 6.12 10 2.05 2340.94 101.31 2239.63 3.90 15 1.58 2697.88 151.97 2545.91 3.00 20 1.31 2983.67 202.62 2781.05 2.49 25 1.13 3226.04 253.28 2972.76 2.15 30 1.00 3438.61 303.94 3134.67 1.91 35 0.91 3629.23 354.59 3274.64 1.73 40 0.83 3802.87 405.25 3397.62 1.58 45 0.77 3962.92 455.91 3507.01 1.47 50 0.72 4111.78 506.56 3605.22 1.37 55 0.68 4251.26 557.22 3694.04 1.29 60 0.64 4382.72 607.87 3774.84 1.22 75 0.55 4738.73 759.84 3978.89 1.05 90 0.49 5050.98 911.81 4139.17 0.94 105 0.44 5330.98 1063.78 4267.20 0.85 120 0.41 5586.04 1215.75 4370.29 0.78 150 0.35 6039.80 1519.68 4520.11 0.67 180 0.31 6437.78 1823.62 4614.15 0.60 360 0.20 8205.34 3647.24 4558.09 0.38 720 0.13 10458.20 7294.48 3163.71 0.24 1440 0.08 13329.61 14588.97 ----- 0.15 4,614.15 ft3 6.12 (ft3/s) Project:Cottonwood Ida Mixed Use Development Project 0 SANDERSON Date:2/11/2019 19 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS S T E WA R T Aspen Street ROW drainage (at full build-out) Design Storm Frequency= SO years Allowable Discharge Rate,d= 0.17 cfs Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Runoff Frequency Calculation Area Area Coefficient Factor Value A A/(43s60 tt/Iae) C C f C x Cf C' C'x A Surface Type (ft) Acres =(C z Q<or=t Acres Gravel 0 0.000 0.7 1 0.70 0.70 0.000 Rooftop 0 0.000 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.000 Concrete&Asphalt 13500 0.310 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.294 Grass,Landscaping,Field 2500 0.057 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 0.014 Totals 1 16000 0.3673 0.3088 Weighted Runoff Coefficient,Cud - SCA - - - 0.8406 Cud x C f= 0.84 SAi Cud x Cf x SA,= 0.31 Where Ci is the adjusted runoff coefficient for surface type j and Ai is the area of surface type j A=rrr2 Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Site Detention Peak Flow Duration,t Intensity,i =C�z SA z i z t =d x t =Runoff Votume•'.c6 ge Volume =Cwd z SAj z i (min) (in/hr) (ft) (ft� (ft� (ft'/s) 1 9.16 169.73 10.13 159.60 2.83 5 3.22 298.13 50.66 247.47 0.99 10 2.05 379.98 101.31 278.67 0.63 15 1.58 437.92 151.97 285.95 0.49 20 1.31 484.31 202.62 281.69 0.40 25 1.13 523.65 253.28 270.37 0.35 30 1.00 558.16 303.94 254.22 0.31 35 0.91 589.10 354.59 234.51 0.28 40 0.83 617.28 405.25 212.03 0.26 45 0.77 643.26 455.91 187.36 0.24 50 0.72 667.43 506.56 160.87 0.22 55 0.68 690.07 557.22 132.85 0.21 60 0.64 711.40 607.87 103.53 0.20 75 0.55 769.19 759.84 9.35 0.17 90 0.49 819.88 911.81 ----- 0.15 105 0.44 865.33 1063.78 ----- 0.14 120 0.41 906.73 1215.75 ----- 0.13 150 0.35 980.38 1519.68 ----- 0.11 180 0.31 1044.98 1823.62 ----- 0.10 360 0.20 1331.89 3647.24 ----- 0.06 720 0.13 1697.58 7294.48 ----- 0.04 1440 0.08 2163.67 14588.97 ----- 0.03 285.95 ft' 0.49 (ft'/s) BOZ E MA MT Community Development RC REVISION AND CORRECTION SUBMITTAL FORM ADDITIONAL OR REVISED PLANS OR DOCUMENTS FOR AN ACTIVE PROJECT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS COMPLETED FORM. MAILED RE-SUBMITTALS THAT DO NOT INCLUDE THIS FORM OR THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE CORRECT NUMBER OF COPIES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. FEES ARE REQUIRED FOR THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS All revisions / correction submittals must contain the following: :�_- ❑o A completed RC revision/correction submittal form. The same number of copies and sizes and formats (including digital) as required for the initial application. Plans and documents, including digital files must meet plans, specifications and naming protocols. See form PLS. Revised drawings must be updated with a new current date on each revised sheet.Title sheet table of contents/plan schedule must be updated with new dates for each sheet modified. If complete plans sets are updated, retain the original date on sheets that have not been updated or revised. A written narrative that shows an itemized summary of your submittal and description of each change or revision in detail or document. Changes to plans sheets must include sheet and detail numbers. ❑■ All changes must be clouded or highlighted on each plan set. ❑■ Legal documents, studies, letters or other documentation must have a clear date of revision on the front page. ❑■ Fees are required for a third and subsequent submittal of revised/cor4 c'd'ma(teMs.T i,e fee's i/a�off the total original application fee. L�I ❑■ Re-submittal of plans must be complete plan sets if individual sheet ar-e- o' di#'9d @o2§%vi- al beets will be accepted. i 0■ RC form must be the first item in all resubmitted sets. DEPARTPliENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Application #18516 Application P P U D file #: type: Project Name: Cottonwood and Ida Contact Name: Erik Nelson Phone: 406-539-1176 Email: erik@thinktankarchitects.com Revision and Correction RC Page 1 of 2 Revision Date 3-20-18 Required Forms: PLS SUBMITTAL TYPE NEW CHANGE: A revision or change that the applicant has made to a plan that is currently under review that is new and has not been reviewed before. CORRECTION: A correction to the plans that is an applicant response to a correction letter written by the City to the applicant. If both types are being submitted, the written narrative required above listing itemized changes must clearly differentiate between changes and corrections and each must be clearly labeled. Changes to preliminarily approved plans or approved plans are processed under the modification application process, use form MOD for those changes. Re-submittal of plans must be complete plan sets if individual sheets are modified. No individual sheets will be accepted. CITY USE ONLY Date / O Checked and received: a. ( 3 I received by: SJV\ S Number of In digital sets " submitted: copy Y/N:: \/ Superion updated? Planner/Engineer: Y/N: DRC Required? Date routed to Y/N: Engineer: 01 If no DRC, date comments due to planner. 10 working days from submittal date typical: CONTACT US Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406-582-2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Revision and Correction RC Page 2 of 2 Revision Date 3-20-18 Required Forms: FP_Ls E it 9 To: Brian Krueger City of Bozeman Planning Department Re: Cottonwood and Ida Mixed Use project PPUD Resubmittal Plan file#18516 Date: 2-13-19 Dear Brian, Per some discussions with the Planning department we are providing some clarifications to our plans prior to the DRC meeting scheduled for the 20th of this month. The following is the list of information provided with this RC form. • Clarification to Relaxation#10 Nonresidential parking reduction, Section 3.05 PUD RELAXATIONS we have provided the entire section 3.01-3.05, but the modification only exists on page 51 o DOCUMENT:C and I Section 3.01-3.05 Project Overview and PUD information 2-13-19 • Provided Private Utility plan per 38.410.060.B.3 This is a new sheet to be added. We have also provided the Title sheet reflecting the updated drawings and dates o PLANS: 0211-Cottonwood Ida--C1.2-Private Utilities Plan 2019.02.13 • Provided updated information for Stormwater New Appendices Item M o Appendices:Appendix M Stormwater 2-13-19 We look forward to the moving through the review process and bringing this project to the community as soon as possible to get their feedback on the high-level items. Please don't hesitate to contact us should you have some initial thoughts or clarifications needed with these clarifications and additions. Sincerely, Erik Nelson Thinktank Design Group Inc. Page �1 T H I N KTA N K D E S I G N th N.BLACK AVE BO.com lnfo@thinktankarchitects.com Stan 406.587.3628 itectscom thlnktankarchitects.com Info@thlnktankarchltects.com c 00 Ile L I . COTTONWOOD + IDA MIXED-USE � s CONU ?3 f ----- T - ,unaminul�ynn y.cFr: y :�t rr DEVELOPMENT TA AVBRAM,OVERSE,AITAWABIEOO/WMYNTXE CORE OF IHEWORi7EAlTERWABOBOYODOO �.^^F_ • I ) RDETO9EPLEORPTEYD RP LLC OWNER BANGTAI PARTNERS, LLC PROxCTw" L SITE PLAN•SHEET INDEX -•••'� . ,L PROACT TYPE _ '.'i / - 'fJ RAVEDU(T aEVELaPLET7r INCLUDING,DWELLNOLMS,OFFICE BUILDING,ARTISAN MANUFACTURING ARCMECTLRILL DATE ISSUED DEVELOPER CPA ENGINEERST -WART3 f -� WORKSHOP$PUBLIC COURTYARD.RENOVATION OF AN EXISTNGBUtDINGON SITE.ADD UNDERGROUND AS.aB TRUE SlffT 01212ot9 CONTACT N PART TENS,LLC. CONTACT MKE RUSSE �. - AS11B OVERALPROET SITE PUN o,2V2019 33IMT:JON EYAE CONTACT:ABCCK SRE P 1n , a.t� !\-� PROPOSED 77 NORTH BACK AVE 106 EASE BABCOCK STREET nA� AS,11)1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN O1M20,9 BOZEMAN.Mr S97Is D0x91ANA MT ST715 '•� LA•� �.� \\ RESIDENTIAL lI5E AS. SITE USAGE INFORMATION PUN OVIV2019 AP541-1M70 M06922-A717 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL MANUFACIWNG,COLILKNDYSPACE AS.Ra ACCESSIBILITY DIAGRAMS OVAi2019 MRIBSEILaS�UOERSONB'fETVARi.00L1 - � Q } � ! ,IrovE AS,IN SITE DETAILS OVt12019 � � .f', ._ DWELLNGS: oONTACOPE DUNW.NC. BTIDICIUUL BDNEBR V �w `� 1. 92 DWELLINGS 910%TOMEETAFFORDABE HOUSENGORRANCE) AS1'10 OVHWL FLOOR PLAN-LVLO 01/212019 O7616TH SIAN TREET HOCiIN NSi90AN6IONK8 I15 � / �� A STUDIO UiTS /0 AS1'Ii OVERALLR-OOR PLAN•LVL1 0t2120U 17751tfM81REEr CONTACT:TYMOMTS/MATTCLONNG61 - ,���� +7�J_- L�,� `�'.. B. /®ROOM N PAOECT AS.1'Ix OVERALL ROOK PLAN•IVLt OVNROU SAN FRANCISCO, TOO WEST BABCOCK STREET '�'L, µ7' ,YF 7N Rr`- .`�� AS1 3 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN-LVL3 0121/lOt9 115091085M BOffL1AN,MT 59715 sj` +wt_,sf-.y +_� f]7yyr�--,�,'� YU C. 2ffDR00M fe 170E AS11M OVERALFLOORPLAN-ROOF LEVEL 0.2019 MARKNOOAN�OPENSCOPE9TIDIO.GAI 7M«xsgrats,KaxoOM } L,A- � d::.�" JII E.r� .� ♦1�i.1 p BUILDRD/6GHT(5): 52 FOOT MAXIMUM BUILDING 160R COTTONWOOD AS1111 STREET ELEVATIONS 01212019 MLl MENwKCOM 7 �'-�`•'"P"7 t _ r 1, + AS2112 SITE ELEVATIONS OV9Vm,9 TNMRANNDESINIGROIP Qfi `�,' I=._iI 'Ut1l`f Y ` M._Y}•-; NIA6EROFSUALONG3: 6TOTAl(SNEW.IRENOVATED) IDA AS.ZO SITE ELEVATIONS 012t2o19 CONTACT:ERKNELSON/BRIMICALDWBL REP ENGINEER 33 NORM BLACK AVEEMERALD CITY ENGINEERS.NF •1 �'J TOTAL PARKING SPACES:MO AS21H SIZE ELEVATIONS OVit2019 ` , 1. 9O SPACES N UNDERGROUND GARAGE AS711 SIZE SECTIONS NGRTHSOUfH 07/2V2019 BOZEMAN.MT 59715 CONTACT'ADAM FRENCH P.E.I SHAWN DOI ly /f ) +�,• _ 40SJWT-6m 21705HKHWAY99 � r�k �L.1T ;';_- 2. 32 SPACES AT ON87REET LOCATION AS.K12 SITE SECTIONS EAST•N'EST 01/2VlO19 i, - 7: ./, i \', 3. 72 SPACES AT OFF-SE LOCATION ERKOTHINKTAIKARCHIECTS.COM MOU T AKETERRACE.WA9O0D s v . �. /S.313 STREET CROSS SECTIONS OvIll"I9 BRlAMQ7TN(TANKARO(IECTSCOM 425-741-1200 L"'1Y'U!3 /�L. INTENT 15 AFRENCHI@ELERALDCIIYENG.COII �jT-j�.{�/y '� �;�" CO7TONWOOD.IDAMCOEOk5E DEVELOPMENT WILL CREATE AVIBRANT AND DP49M COMMUNITY ON A 2- FERNAU&HARTMAN ARCHITECTS sD01@EMERADarflRaC01A , r '�^•" � 'L'y.. + ACNE UMERUIMRED IDUSTRAL SITE.RlW1aNG THE MOST DIVERSE RANGE OF HOUSING TYPES CONTACT:RICIMRD FERNAIL FNA '~� f CIVIL SMMIESSTREET ACOUSTICAL �I7 r9 AVAaADLEM802aIua COTTI;NWOODBIDA CIA E%L4IING TOPOGRA➢Y AAD DEMO 01272019 CLYDE PARK,MT SWIG CHNRLESM.SALTER ASSOCIATES D9G BOZENAH,Irr 59715 C1.1 PROPOSED LOT BOUNDARY Otramis Mo56eaaf97 CONTACT:EITNN SANER/FEUPE TAVERA CCC��� y RF@FERAAUHARlYUHCOM 130 SUTTER STREET.FLOORS ' � ,�" SAWF7.0442 O,GAN106 PROJECT Lonna 12MIEAREAAROUNDSITE C21, PRIVATE NTIL7TV'PLAN 072Y2019 GENERAL CONTMROR SANFR0MA2 LANOAS O ASSOCIATES E IVULSILLTER@MSALTER.COM M EDGE CLD 57DFW DRAIN PLAN o12vm,v CONTACT:LORENCANTRELL FETIPE.TAVEIU@CALVLLTER.COI VICINITY MAP PROJECT NARRATIVE 02.13-2019 CS URIrY RAN 01272019 1019 E MAN ST,SUITE 101 C5.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 01222019 �5971s LNG ENVELOPE OHEGER SITE PLAN- C7.0 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 0,2220i9 LORENCOLAMOlAELCOM CONTACT MATUEW ELWORSTER 9 1 W PPE STREET,Um ls00 SP1 WOSCAPEARCNTECT SAN FRANCISCO,CA 04111 REVISIONS FLETCHER SROO 415495-3700 LADSW'E CONTACT:DAVD FIETCHER/CHRIS WATKNS MSWORSTER@SGHCOM DATE. U.W ILLUSTRATIVE SITE RAN OV2720,9 23253RD STREET,#Itl L1.00 MATERIALS RAN OVL720,9 SANFRANCISCOCA94107 LLB I SUSTANABIlTY Ox/13R018 LI.Vl TAKEOFF RAN OV112019 41S�31.7878 KATH WILLIAMS-ASSOCIATES L2W PLANT94G PALETTE 0,A2,2019 DFLETCHQt@FlETCHE7L3T1DI4COM CONTACT:KATHWl11PMS 1201 RANTNO RAN 01212019 CWATKNSpfI£rCHERSTUINO.COM P.0.B0K119, flOZEMAKMr59771 13A0 TRRGATION PLAN 0,A212019 GEOTECINCAL ENGINEER 40566"1TS LMAO GRADING PLAN OV272019 ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES KATHWTHWILLIA/SCOM L1.01 97ORMWAIER RAN 012M019 CONI T:IEE EVA" L5.00 SNOW STORAGE RAN 012V?OI9 3209COV Wr DRIVE LIGHTING DESIGN LSAo LIGHTING DIAGRAM DU212ot9 BQZEMAK r59715 OPENSCOPE STUDIO.INC. _ M056520 SAN 221 CONTACT:GEORGIA KRAPF E L7.W PERFORMANCE POINTS 01212019 LEVANSBALLEDENGPEERNG.CON 177011ITHSTREET ASNDIG7® 11 SAN FRANCISCO.CA 920641-6563 STTEUGEnlW GEOR%MUtAPF@OP0=OPESTIDID.COM d EODI LUmLWIE SCHEDULE 012t2019 E1.W SITE UGHTNG Ota2019 HARE OF PROJECT: COTTONWOOD AND RA NLDOIBORHDOD DEVELOPMENT TITLE SHEET EtAt SITE PHOTOOETRICS OVM,2019 3 LOCATION OF PROJECT: COTTONWOOD 6 D/L B07BMAK MT 59715 Mi SHMT9 BLOOD I LOT(S): BLOCK 105/LOTS 5.25 PARCELam(s) 207ACRES(N.013SaFT) eC A AV9000 CONTACTS PROJECT INFORMATION (i �i i IJ CTl LL- LLJ N W W tj } � CD U y O (1 m { D WALLACE AVENUE — GSas 05 as GS as — — I GS SD (CITY R/W) 0 d r U / s I , . $q a \ I lilt a 98 al g Dil n — ,_ D I hr a� � �� � 1 _ I I iIr o ° d I IUt --ramI G C � V P IDA AVE. i - - �( I TY C r-- v i i All min p F A.-I HIM Ril x 3 P. R m 3 S r'F S H. 411 1 p AOZ err `- X O Z Gl 8> 1 8 @@ Z z 0 0AN rn a 9 A> g z� v T l l l l l l l PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW COTTONWOOD 8 IDA ONSITE PNORTHERN PACIFIC ADDITION p S A N D E R S O N 4� BOZEMAN,MONTANA $ IV UTILITIES PLAN s T E WA R T PRIVATE � � www.sanderonstewart.com • 1-- ��� 2i LIJ c� LIJ o >uiLi a-L t=--� V. SECTION 8 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE . Jt JAN 28 2019 COM ALINI1Y JEVEL0.,!"ME\l. no COTTom 000 IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 Cottonwood&Ida Mixed-Use Development m®Preliminary Project Schedule ID Task Name iDuration ,start IFi nish ry l _, May 1 , September 1_.. lanuary_1 _ May 1 September 1_ January 1 May 1 ._ 15eptember 1 J ._.. _�__.. ! ___.__ r 2/_ _! _I 6/2 7/28 L9/22_,.L11/1�1/12�3/8 /3�6/28 8/23_I,10/18_L12/13 2/7 4/4 5/30 _7/25,1 9%19, ,11/14 1 iLANGLAS&ASSOCIATES,INC. 527 days Thu 5/23/19 Fri 5/28/21 LANGLAS&ASSOCIATES,INC. 2 1 Construction 527 days Thu 5/23/19 Fri 5/28/21 Construction 3 1 Early Work Amendments 13 days Thu 5/23/19 Mon 6/10/19 Early Work Amendments 7 Parking Garage 200 days Thu 5/23/19 Wed 2/26/20 1 Parking Garage i 39 � Offsite Improvements 519 days Tue 6/4/19 Fri 5/28/21 ., Offsite Improvements t - 40 Wallace Parking Lot(Use for 56 days Tue 6/4/19 Tue 8/20/19 f- 1 Wallace Parking Lot(Use for Contractor Parking During Construction) Contractor Parking During Construction) I 55 ➢ East Aspen,Ida and East Cottonwood 519 days Tue 6/4/19 Fri 5/28/21 I East Aspen,Ida and East Cottonw Streets i I I 82 Building 6-Office 240 days Thu 10/3/19 Wed 9/2/20 Building 6-Office 154 j Buildings 1&2-Rental Apt's&Studios 265 days Thu 10/10/19 Wed 10/14/20 1 Buildings 1&2-Rental Apt's&Studios j I 226 Building 3&4-Townhouses&Lofts 260 days Thu 1/23/20 Wed 1/20/21 II Building 3&4 To nhouses&Lofts I 302 Building 5-Renovation 120 days Thu 5/14/20 Wed 10128/201 1 Building 5-Renovation r I 306 Substantial Completion 0 days Fri 5/28/21 Fri 5/28/21 Substantial Completion Task Project Summary I Inactive Milestone O Manual Summary Rollup Deadline • Project:Cottonwood&Ida Prelim Split ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, External Tasks aiei5 Inactive Summary i'---------n Manual Summary I Critical Date:Tue 10/2/18 Milestone ♦ External Milestone • Manual Task Start-only C Critical Split ......................... Summary 1 Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only 7 Progress Page 1 t SECTION 8 APPENDIX 0 TITLE REPORT RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL 11 11 JANUARY 2019 CHICAGO TITLE INSUkANCE COMAN ' Policy No. : 7170-1-1-109058-2018.72156-215267676 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, herein called the Company, guarantees the Assured against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY THE LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS.AND THE SPECIFIC ASSURANCES AFFORDED BY THIS GUARANTEE. IF YOU WISH ADDITIONAL LIABILITY, OR ASSURANCES OTHER THAN AS CONTAINED HEREIN, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMPANY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AS TO THE AVAILABILITY AND COST. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Countersigned: (0�By: BY � � 1NSU Authorized Officer or Agent 1�,.... Bradley C. Stratton o 0 o .� American Land Title Company of Montana 1800 W Koch St os SEAL } President Bozeman, MT 59715 Tel:406-587-5563 i,,;« Fax:406-587-8038 Attest: Secretary `!1 Note: This endorsement shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized signatory. �s ah, u; uF Lt �I NJ fA 72156 72156 Miscellaneous Guarantee Face Page 00_156 • Page i of 1 � • SCHEDULE A Policy Number: 7170-1-1-109058-2018.72156-215267676 Order No. 1-109058(Bangtail Partners,LLC) Liability: $200.00 Fee: '3160.00 Dated: October 17,2018 at 8:00 A.M. Assured: The County of Gallatin and in the City of Bozeman in Montana. The assurances referred to on the face page are: That, according to those public records which,under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters relative to the following described real property: Parcel A: Lots 5 through 16, inclusive, all in Block 105 of The Northern Pacific Addition to The Ci v of Bozeman, Gallatin County,Montana. Together with the vacated alley, adjacent and contiguous thereto,pursuant to Ordinance No 628,recorded July 29, 1991 in Film 117,page 328,:ac::ord_ng to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk Inc Recorder of Gallatin County,Montana. [Plat No. C-23] Parcel B: Lots 17 through 28,Inclusive,all in Block 105 of The Northern Pacific Addition t the Ci-� A Bozeman, Gallatin County,Montana. Together with the vacated alley adjacent aril contiguOus thereto,pursuant to Ordinance No. 628,recorded July 29, 1991 in Film 117,page 132.3. according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk.and Recorder of Gallatin County,Montana. [Plat No. C-23] Title to said real property is vested in: Bangtail Partners,LLC,a California limited liabililry company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions,which Exceptions are not reces.saril., shown in the order of their priority. (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 SCHEDULE A Policy Number: 7170-1-1-109058-2018.72156-215267676 Order No. 1-109058(Bangtail Partners,LLC) EXCEPTIONS: PARCEL A: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in.he United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Title to any property beyond the lines of the real property expressly described herein, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways on which such real property abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any other structure or improvement; or any rights or easements therein unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. 4. Taxes for the year 2018 and subsequent years. Taxes for the year 2017 are paid. Taxes for the year 2018 are a lien not yet due or payable. (Parcel No. RGH2O158) 5. Special assessments levied by the City of Bozeman for 2017-2018 under Account No. 33710: First Half: Arterial&Collector. �r District No. 8000 Street Maintenance. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. First Half Amount: Installment paid. Second Half: Arterial& Collector. District No. 8000 Street Maintenance. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. 4 A Second Half Amount: Installment paid. 1, 1 No liability is assumed for any special assessments, snow removal, sewer assessment or garbage assessment not set forth in the Assessment Books.of the City of Bozeman. (Continued) rr 6 ui SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 SCHEDULE A Policy Number: 7170-1-1-109058-2018.72156-215267676 Order No. 1-109058(Bangtail Partners,LLC) 6. Any right,title, or interest in minerals in or under said land including,but not limi-ed to, metals, oil, gas,coal, other hydrocarbons, sand gravel or other common variety materials., stone,mineral rights,mining rights, easement rights,water rights,claims of title tc water c- other matters relating thereto,whether expressed or implied and whether or not shown'-1y t-he public records. PARCEL B: l. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any --axing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records 2. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in the United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights,claims or title to water. 3. Title to any property beyond the lines of the real property expressly described herein, or title to streets,roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways on which such real property ab.zts, c-the r_►en right to maintain therein vaults,tunnels, ramps, or any other structure or improvet; c=any rights or easements therein unless such property, rights or easements are exoressl; anc specifically set forth in said description. 4. Taxes for the year 2018 and subsequent years. Taxes for the year 2017 are paid. Taxes =o- the year 2018 are a lien not yet due or payable. (Parcel No. RGH28111) 5. Special assessments levied by the City of Bozeman for 2017-2018 under Account No. 135880: First Half: Arterial&Collector. District No. 8000 Street Maintenance. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. First Half Amount: Installment paid. (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 SCHEDULE A Policy Number: 7170-1-1-109058-2018.72156-215267676 Order No. 1-109058 (Bangtail Partners,LLQ Second Half: Arterial &Collector. District No. 8000 Street Maintenance. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. Second Half Amount: Installment paid. No liability is assumed for any special assessments, snow removal, sewer assessment or garbage assessment not set forth in the Assessment Books of the City of Bozeman. 6. Any right, title, or interest in minerals in or under said land including,but not limited to, metals, oil,gas,coal,other hydrocarbons, sand gravel or other common variety materials, stone, mineral rights, mining rights, easement rights,water rights, claims of title to water or other matters relating thereto, whether expressed or implied and whether or not shown by the public records. END OF SCHEDULE A SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 • • Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations (12/15/95) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under(1), (2) or(3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this. Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 • • GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 M t. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state; to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. t In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: ! (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. �i (Continued) { i i 1 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 1` • • GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. (Continued) t; SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 • • GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of$1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. (Continued) SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, o-validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and an), statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the numbet of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 1800 West Koch, Bozeman, Montana 59715. f; 6 r SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Reorder Form No. 12421 • • GEOTECH REPORT Part 1 DDDDDCD D 0 ADD RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL 11 11 JANUARY 2019 FCivil Engineering . Geotechnical Engineering . Land Surveying D 32 Discovery Drive ENGfNFE ° Bozeman.Montana 59718 ENGIsxpvlcNEERING Ph: 1406) 582-0221 Fax: (406) 582.5770 �O O��erse pole -+ May 31, 2018 Erik Nelson -- Think Tank Design Group 33 N. Black Ave. Bozeman, MT 59715 i e-mail: erik@thinktankarchitects.com (Issued via email only) r N r_. Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment p Cottonwood+Ida Development—Bozeman, MT c 1r Dear Mr. Nelson: 6 L-- This letter and attachments provide our preliminary geotechnical assessment for the proposed site of the Cottonwood+Ida Development project, located on the northeast side of Bozeman, MT. To date, our work has consisted of the excavation of five on-site test pits and the installation of five PVC wells, the collection of weekly groundwater monitoring data from April 24 through May 29, the review of area soils information from the project site to the south, and the preparation of this preliminary report. Over the next few months, we will continue to monitor groundwater levels and issue this data via email. e Based on the three to four-story heights of the proposed buildings, we do recommend drilling deeper borehole explorations at some point in the future to confirm that dense sandy gravel conditions continue with depth (which we expect they will). The purpose of this initial summary is to describe the site's soil and groundwater conditions, identify any potential issues that we foresee, and present some preliminary geotechnical recommendations that will need to be considered for the development of this property. This letter does not constitute a final geotechnical report with complete recommendations. We recommend preparing a more formal report once the borehole drilling is done. Several exhibits are provided as attachments to this letter. These include a vicinity map, a geology map, and a test pit location map with the depths to native gravel. Also attached are our test pit logs, test pit photos, groundwater monitoring data, and exploration logs from the neighboring project on the south - side of E. Cottonwood St. Please refer to these exhibits while reviewing the report. SITE LOCATION The project site encompasses approximately two acres and is bounded on the south by E. Cottonwood St., on the east by N. Ida Ave., on the north by the future extension of E. Aspen St., and on west by existing buildings that line the east side of N. Wallace Ave. The subject property is comprised of Lots 5 through 28 of Block 105 of the Northern Pacific Addition. Its legal description is the SW1/4, SE1/4 of www.alliedengineering.com • • • • Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Project:18-054 Cottonwood+Ida Development—Bozeman,MT May 31, 2018 Section 6,T2S, R6E, Gallatin County and its latitude and longitudinal coordinates(near the center of site) are 45.6870861 and-111.0272780. See Figure 1 for an aerial map showing the site location. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The project site slopes to the north at grades of one to two percent, similar to most other areas around Bozeman. The south half is largely undeveloped, except for a small old building in the southwest corner. Most recently, this area has been used for staging for the Block 106 building construction project on the south side of E. Cottonwood St. The majority of the north half is covered by concrete or asphalt surfacing and contains three old, single story, metal buildings. We expect most, if not all, of the existing buildings on the site are underlain by slab-on-grade foundations. As we understand it, all of the buildings on the north side of the site will be demolished and removed as part of the project. The small building in the southwest corner will be saved and renovated. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS According to planning documents from November 2017, the proposed project will be a high-density development consisting of five, large, multi-story buildings, along with the renovated, existing building in the southwest corner. The structures will include apartment buildings, townhouse-style apartments, and an office building. Most will be three stories in height, while a portion of one of the apartment buildings will be four stories. The unique feature of the project will be a partially below-grade parking garage that covers most of the site and underlies all of the new buildings and open space areas. There will be no on-site,at-grade parking,expect for a few spots provided along E. Cottonwood St. GEOLOGY According to a geology map for the Bozeman area, an excerpt of which is attached as Figure 2, the mapped geology throughout most of the northeast side of the city consists of Quaternary-aged, alluvial and fluvial deposits (Qal) from the Bozeman Creek and E. Gallatin River drainages. Based on previous geotechnical experience, the dominate material within this formation is shallow cobbly, sandy gravel that typically begins at a depth of three to five feet. The gravels are overlain by an intermediate layer of silt/clay and capped by a thin layer of organic topsoil. In this part of Bozeman, the gravels are expected to extend to a depth of 25 to 50 feet before overlying consolidated beds of Tertiary-aged gravels, sands, silts, and clays,which are generally and locally considered to be "bedrock". AREA SOILS INFORMATION In 2005, we performed the soils investigation for the two properties to the south of the site along the south side of E. Cottonwood St. The eastern property is home to the Mill Lofts building, while the western property is where the Block 106 project is under construction. As part of our work, we drilled 32 Discovery Drive . Bozeman,Montana 59718. Ph:14061582.0221 .Fax:(406)582-S770 .www.alliedengineering.com Page 2 Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Project: 18-054 Cottonwood+Ida Development—Bozeman, MT May 31, 2018 five, deep borings and dug four, shallow test pits. The locations of these explorations as well as the logs are attached. in general, we encountered dense to very dense, clean sandy gravel beginning at depths of 3.0 to 4.0 feet. The sandy gravel formation extended to the bottom of the 30-foot boreholes. EXPLORATIONS,TESTING, AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface Explorations Subsurface conditions were investigated across the site on April 24, 2018 by Lee Evans, a professional geotechnical engineer with Allied Engineering. Five test pits, identified as TP-1 through TP-5, were dug with a tracked excavator provided by Townsend Backhoe. All pits extended to depths of 13 to 14 feet. Pits 1 and 2 were placed in the southwest and southeast corners of the property. Pit 3 was located near the center; and pits 4 and 5 were in the northwest and northeast corners. During backfilling, each of the five pits was outfitted with a 13 to 14-foot deep length of 4-inch, perforated PVC pipe (that extended to the bottom of the pits) for future groundwater monitoring needs. The casing height of the wells (above existing ground) generally ranges from 2.0 to 3.0 feet. The monitoring well numbering system corresponds with the test pits, ie. MW-1 is installed in TP-1, MW-2 in TP-2, and so on. The monitoring well identification is written on the side of the exposed casing as well as on the underside of the PVC well caps. See Figure 3 for the approximate test pit and monitoring well locations. During the explorations, soil and groundwater conditions were visually characterized, measured, and logged. The relative densities of the soils were estimated based on the ease or difficulty of digging and the side wall stability of the test pit excavation. Copies of our test pit logs are attached at the end of this report. Each log provides pertinent field information, such as soil depths, thicknesses, and descriptions, groundwater measurements (at the time of exploration), relative density data, soil sample information, and a sketch of the soil stratigraphy. Please be aware the detail provided on the logs cannot be accurately summarized in a paragraph; therefore, it is very important to review the logs in conjunction with the report. Following completion of the fieldwork, the excavations were backfilled and cleaned up to the best extent possible. Each test pit was staked with a wooden lath that identified it accordingly. To better illustrate the on-site soils, two photos from each test pit are also provided. The first photo of each set shows the sidewall of the excavation, while the second photo is of the excavated spoil pile. All photos have been marked up to call out the soil layers and materials that are described on the logs as well as identifying characteristics. Note: Please be aware that no compaction of test pit backfill soils was done; therefore, these areas will be susceptible to future soil settlement. All test pit locations should be re-excavated to their original depth and properly backfilled and compacted if they will underlie any proposed site improvements, including building foundations, interior slabs, underground utilities, and other hardscape areas. The test pit locations should be easy to identify based on the presence of the groundwater monitoring wells and the soft/loose, intermixed soil backfill conditions. 32 Discovery Drive. Bozeman,Montana 59718 . Ph:(406)S82-0221 .Fax:(406)582-5770.www.alliedengineering.com Page 3 0 0 • 0 Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Project:18-054 Cottonwood+Ida Development-Bozeman, MT May 31, 2018 Laboratory Testing No soil samples were collected, thus no lab testing was completed. The site's gravelly soil conditions did not warrant the need for any such testing. Soil Conditions As expected, the site is underlain by shallow, clean, cobbly, sandy gravels beginning at depths of 4.0 to 4.5 feet. These gravelly materials resemble good pitrun gravel and contain abundant 4" to 6" gravels and scattered 8" to 10" cobbles. The gravel was uniform and consistent to the bottom of the 13 to 14- foot deep, test pits. In some pits and at varying depths, the gravel formation was laced with some sandier pockets and/or thin sandy lenses. In general, the gravel on the south side of the site dug a little harder and was therefore a little denser as opposed to the easier digging and looser gravels in the middle and north parts of the property. Directly overlying the sandy gravel is a 1.0 to 2.0-foot layer of brown to tan, silt/clay. Throughout most of the site, the uppermost 2.5 to 3.0 of soil (in all test pits) is dark brown, silt/clay that is interbedded with thin layers of buried, black topsoil. A thin layer of surface topsoil covers the site to depths of 0.5 to 0.8 feet. All soils that were encountered appeared to be native except for a little bit of gravelly fill in TP-4 and TP-5 below the surface topsoil. The fill in both of these pits was only about 0.5-foot thick. Provided in Table 1 is a summary of the soil conditions that were observed in the test pits. The material descriptions and soil depths in the table match the data shown on the attached test pit logs. Table 1. Summary of Soil Conditions in Test Pits 1-5 NATIVE NATIVE NATIVE TP TP TOPSOIL RANDOM SILT/CLAY TOPSOI? SILT/CLAY SANDY # LOCATION FILL (BURIED LAYER) (DK BROWN) (BROWN) GRAVEL 1 SW Corner 0.0'-0.8' -------- 0.8'-2.0' 2.0'-2.5' 2.5'-4.0' 4.0'-13.0' 2 SE Corner 0.0'-0.5' ----- 0.5'-1.0' 1.0'-1.5' 2.5'-4.0' 1.5'-2.0' 2.0'-2.5' 3 Center 0.0'-0.8' -------- 0.8'-2.0' 2.0'-2.7' 2.7'-4.3' 4.3'-13.3' 4 NW Corner 0.0'-0.5' 0.5'-1.0 1.5'-2.7' 3.0'-4.5' 4.5'-13.5' 2.7'-3.0' 5 NE Corner 0.0'-0.5' 0.5'-1.0' 1.5'-3.0' 1.0'-1.5' 3.0'-4.0' 4.0'-14.0 Notes: 1) All soil measurements are depths below existing ground. 2) The native sandy gravel is identified as the"target"bearing material for all foundation improvements. 32 Discovery Drive. Bozeman.Montana 59718 . Ph:(406)582-0221 .Fax:(406)582-5770.www.alliedengineering.com Page 4 Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Project:18-054 Cottonwood+Ida Development—Bozeman, MT May 31, 2018 Groundwater Conditions The site is underlain by relatively shallow groundwater conditions. During our April 24 explorations, groundwater was generally encountered between the depths of 9 to 10 feet below existing ground. Over the last month, we have been monitoring groundwater levels on a weekly basis and will continue to do so over the coming months. Provided in Table 2 are the shallowest groundwater measurements recorded in the wells to date. For the most part, groundwater has risen to the 8.0 to 8.5-foot depth in most areas. The shallowest groundwater is at the center of the site at a depth of 7.8'. Other than TP-1, which experienced its highest water on May 15, all other wells topped out so far on April 30. Based on previous experience, there is a high probability that seasonal high groundwater on the north side of Bozeman did not occur prior to the April 24 explorations; and therefore, was not missed this year. Table 3. Summary of Groundwater Conditions in Test Pits 1 -5 TP WELL DEPTH CASING HEIGHT SHALLOWEST GW DATE OF TP# LOCATION (BELOW EG) (ABOVE EG) (TO DATE) MEASUREMENT 1 SW Corner 13.0' 31" 7.98' 5/15/18 2 SE Corner 13.0' 36" 8.52' 4/30/18 3 Center 13.3' 27" 7.77' 4/30/18 4 NW Corner 13.5' 28" 8.46' 4/30/18 5 NE Corner 14.0' 22" 8.82' 4/30/18 Notes: 1) All groundwater measurements are depths below existing ground. 2) EG=existing ground. Groundwater throughout the Bozeman area rises and falls on a seasonal basis depending on the time of year. During the winter season, it is near its lowest (deepest) elevation; while at some point in April, May, or early June, it is typically near its seasonal high as a result of runoff from mountain snowmelt and the spring rains. In some areas(primarily on the south and west sides of Bozeman), summer agricultural irrigation practices can cause the groundwater table to rise again in August and early September. Depending on the location, the seasonal groundwater fluctuation (from seasonal low to seasonal high elevations) in Bozeman typically ranges from one to three feet. GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES By far, the biggest issue at the site is shallow groundwater and how it may impact the partially below- grade, parking garage. A related issue is the property is landlocked and there is nowhere to easily discharge either a necessary or precautionary, sub-slab drainage system that was to be installed under the parking garage floor. Other than these, the site really has no other geotechnical concerns. Foundation bearing is a non-issue as the shallow sandy gravel will provide the required support for the three to four-story buildings. As stated earlier, we do recommend completing some deep borehole drilling to confirm that the dense, sandy gravel conditions continue to greater depths below the site. 32 Discovery Drive . Bozeman,Montana S9718. Ph:(406)S82-0221 .Fax:(406)582-S770.www.allieden3ineerin3.com Page 5 is • 0 Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Project: 18-054 Cottonwood+Ida Development—Bozeman, MT May 31,2018 Provided below is some more discussion on the two geotechnical issues that we foresee being the most challenging for this proposed site development, particularly relating to the buried parking garage. • Shallow Groundwater: To date, the highest recorded groundwater levels across the site have ranged from 7.8 to 8.8 feet below existing grades. We will see what groundwater does in the coming months as we continue to monitor. There is good chance that seasonal high water has already occurred this year or will be occurring very soon; and will start to drop as we get into the hotter and drier, summer season. Every year is different with respect to seasonal high water as it depends on snowpack conditions, spring rains, and the timing and duration of runoff. This should be a pretty good year for collecting data given how wet we have been this winter and early spring. With that said however, it should be expected and planned that shallower ground- water conditions could occur in future years. For this reason, garage floor elevations should be set safely and conservatively above the high elevations that are currently documented and/or the garage slab will need to be structurally designed to resist groundwater buoyancy uplift forces and fully water-proofed to make it water-tight. • Lack of Sub-Drain bischorge Area: ItIis a good idea to install a sub-drain system under the parking garage in the event that high water was to rise to the bottom of slab. The problem with this is where do you discharge it? Given that the entire property will be consumed by the parking garage and.buildings, and there are no nearby creeks or drainages, this is a big issue. The site will be bounded by city streets on the north, south, and east, and by existing buildings on the west. The nearest potential discharge point (especially for a high volume of water) is in to Bozeman Creek, which is located 600 to 700 feet west of the site. This would require the construction of a discharge line in the public right-of-way along E. Aspen St. and most likely a lift station to pump the groundwater from below the garage slab grade to the discharge location. Rather than sinking the garage too deep and having to incur the costs for a large drain system and outfall line, the better option may be shallower garage floor depths, increased structural design thickness and rigidity of the slab, and water-proofing. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS .Provided below are some preliminary development recommendations for consideration. This is not an exhaustive list, but only meant to provide some of the more important ones we foresee. Much more in- depth design and construction-related recommendations will be included in a final geotechnical report. Foundation Design ■ Given the dense, sandy gravel conditions at shallow depth, the parking garage and buildings can be supported on shallow conventional foundation systems. There should be no need for deep foundation elements, such as piles. • We anticipate giving an allowable soils bearing pressure of 3,000 to 4,000 psf for the project. 32 Discovery Drive . Bozeman,Montana 59718 .Ph:(406)582-0221 .Fax:(406)582-5770 .www.alliedengineering.com Page 6 Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Project: 18-054 Cottonwood+Ida Development—Bozeman, MT May 31, 2018 Foundation Support • The dense, clean, cobbly, sandy gravel that was encountered at depths of 4.0 to 4.5 feet across the site is the "target" foundation bearing material for all foundations. All perimeter, interior, or exterior footings must bear directly on sandy gravel or on compacted,granular structural fill that in turn bears on the native gravel. No fine-grained silt/clay shall be left in place under footings. • Given the shallow depth of the gravels and the fact that the entire site will be underlain by the partially below-grade parking structure, we expect that most areas will readily bear in the native gravels with a limited need for structural fill. Parking Garage • For this site, we think it makes the most sense to try and limit the depth of the garage as much as possible and keep the garage floor elevation safely and conservatively above the shallowest groundwater level that has been recorded this spring. To date, the shallowest measurement has been 7.8 feet below existing ground at the center of the property. The goal here it to keep the garage space high and dry and essentially eliminate all possibilities of groundwater impacts. • Given the groundwater data we have collected so far this year, which shows the shallowest water at average depths of 8.0 of 8.5 feet, it is hard to believe that groundwater could rise by another 2.0 feet during future years (to a depth of 6.0 to 6.5 feet). Most likely, this would be a pretty safe assumption for how high water could rise. Please be aware this is our opinion only. • The installation of a sub-drain system under the slab is a good idea, but as of right now, there is no place to easily discharge it. We do not recommend pushing the garage elevation into or near the high groundwater table and having to depend on a sub-drain system to keep it dry. This would require the need for off-site infrastructure improvements and possibly some sort of lift station to pump and route the water to a desirable and allowable discharge location. ■ If storm drain improvements will be installed in E. Aspen St. as a result of this project, there is a possibility that a precautionary sub-drain system (which is still a good idea even if garage slab elevations are raised) could be routed to the City system, which may allow for the lowering of the garage a bit more. The idea here is that the system may never be needed to operate, but if water comes up higher during a short period of time, it would be in place to"take the top of the groundwater under the garage" and keep it dry. • Unless the parking garage floor is shallowed considerably to depth of 6 feet to so (to safeguard against the possibility of higher seasonal groundwater in the future), we recommend that the interior slab be thickened and rigidly designed to resist buoyant forces; and a water-proofing membrane be placed under the slab and as well as around the lower part of the walls. Thus, the lower part of the garage would be a water-tight tank that could be submerged in groundwater. 32 Discovery Drive . Bozeman,Montana 59718. Ph:(406)S82-0221 .Fax:(406)582-S770.wwwalliedengineering.com Page 7 is is • • Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Project:18-054 Cottonwood+Ida Development—Bozeman,MT May 31, 2018 LIMITATIONS This letter provides our geotechnical summary for the proposed Cottonwood+Ida Development project, located on the northeast side of Bozeman. Please be advised this document is only applicable for the subject property and shall not be used for other nearby sites. Since geotechnical conditions can change in a short distance, we recommend all project sites be evaluated on a site-specific basis. The recommendations presented herein are based on our observation and evaluation of the project site's subsurface conditions, knowledge of the underlying geology, our previous geotechnical experience in the general project area, on-site groundwater monitoring results from April 24 through May 29, and assumptions on how high groundwater could possibly rise. As stated previously, we do recommend continued groundwater monitoring, deeper borehole drilling, and the preparation of a final geotechnical report before this project goes to final design and construction. If during earthwork and foundation construction, soil and groundwater conditions are found to be inconsistent with those described in the report, we should be advised immediately so that we can analyze the situation and modify our recommendations if need be. All individuals directly associated with this project should consult this report during the planning, design, and construction of the site improvements. It should be made available to other parties for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions such as those interpreted herein. If there are any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Allied Engineering Services, Inc. oNTA Lee S. Evans, PE LEE SCOTT Geotechnical Engineer .• UJ 1442NS : r 31 10 �v enc: Figure 1 — Vicinity Map '••�� •��Egg �N Figure 2 — Geology Map Ir •, S ANAL ,. Figure 3 — Test Pits w/Gravel Depths •••.. Test Pit Logs(TP-1 through TP-5) Test Pit Photos(2 per pit) — Excavation and Spoils Groundwater Monitoring Data from 04.24.18 through 05.29.18 Area Soils Information (Site Map, 5 BH Logs, and 4 TP Logs) Limitations of your Geotechnical Report REFERENCES Slagle, Steven E., May 1995, "Geohydrologic Conditions and Land Use in the Gallatin Valley, Southwestern Montana, 1992-93", U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. 32 Discovery Drive . Bozeman,Montana 59718. Ph:14061582-0221 .Fax:(406)582.5770.wwwzlliedengineering.com Page 8 -� r r-� Y (fl� t �f •l' '4 'i� j,, � `Ar!1 Tr ( In i .g7 WALMART •1 J t, 'R \ L � . 1 ��' _ E TAMARACK 5T ,,] '� ]_ f .I 1�_ � f�•- �L '� r: � � _ a•� �'�` �, ,/� ice, ` I.a n ++ Jr� /... �'.i� •••��iii••'i8 f� �� O a •`47 ' _-• r�r ll V r. • +�• ` ae.a�i _...IL , • � ✓' L i , L:J _�• < ` k '�% PROJECT SITE �+t � PROJECT SITE O COTTONWOOD + IDA .y' +.{}" -• tom# 't COTTONWOOD + IDA :C`�= d, ,°.• -' l•��• .t�l L' :_'�i I _ •� DEVELOPMENT '�~' '�'• ,1 J `•--��- - DEVELOPMENT - EASPEN ST A t �a]` ,r„� � • z ,•:l y�j{J'�ii:�«y�a� ],,, a }� y � ..r • O '' !! v �.y�yl� ��� ? `!•.�F�i 1,- ° �� It .: `1:: 31Q.Iiy DURSTONRD ."""•_ _ aBOZEMAN .tL"' -� ��LC7: ` ..� �i�t` �� �1 ,,rCi 1 3Li, a ►'��pn:� "• HIGH SCHOOLV r \• $ , KY�- '"f z ( iy y a A �� .(. � Jf '�n�'d �� 'is '`' /'�L...+ { l' �►/.�-p�J�j r �1 �`�� Jr Z �'` ��• 1 t ^F"1 �,v�!* tN .Ld `E��p [['�^ ck.'Ta.�' l \� �/ }.: ��!•' �✓ti R r'.�" �`l �-ai- . �' r.+.. r.,� i(Z 'Y ,.t' �' '� a_ r _ a� a � f.: • i!♦.j.` �j'' f- ,» 7 3 �fy ,.,7.,� �,i �� � �,1' �, a' r•I -'(:sW r•ur�y��n _r,• 1• {�� 1 i '� .s�..I• � �L�, ! � C} f' Y`'` �'—' 1 y_�{! � �: I. ,j 1^� `)Mw=' ,y7i•,.,lrn ice:+ -i t yt i• i'• � ,l, - �' .� '.� .�"'� . .iL1 .sii e'.L7�l• F..-• ' -�� ,,'� 'h• �y _ � ✓ i �'.�� -�M ,#•' 5 / r af7• .•fr R— ! MAIN ST ( _ A� �1 ♦s )Tj t - •TAY IS] - ��aT-'� f '�: o. .!a t, •�N; �.i ECOTTONWOOD ST _0 ,,�•. i����,�, :� _ _ I/ 17.l�'„ •'{. '' O ,_c i _ pt •A� •a WILD CRUMB T Kttp:�Jr+� _ 'L • 1Lj' � - �i r F, �a�1 . - BAKERY 1�n-+p r• �y.'�! '�J � 'k `*'ram•'� .�; I •�� � mil BLOCK 106 BUILDING COLLEGE (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) MONTANA STATE 'a '1•.1 ,{,.� , M. ! _ 4{. a.._ �_• .' � 2. 4 4 + I UNIVERSITY 1 A x. f_ ` �> 01`� -►� 1 r _ �� EPEACH S7 i BOZEMAN HEALTH i~�" .• U Z t�7 !'••v� ^� HOSPITAL - • f' l a !' "' .�� `' �j i J i Yr m I! ,+ ^?• erg• �i �r r w•'1WIW l44 � 3lip i• 4- _`,.. ;1"I U'A 'I _ �.a--=•' ��., `. \ Vs.'�p KARST STAGE •T" * 7 ; ^ f F ;- t' 7k A r� yt�i ' (�fa'�` _ w� s [ • �. li till >i 4 OVERVIEW MAP CLOSE-UP MAP BOZEMAN AREA PROTECT SITE AREA ! I s b 0 Ir 2r DDDD o 200 .00 aoo $ salt(E¢r) N scA1t(sEEn N k NO. RENSWS DRAWN BY DALE PROJECT/:18-054 scAlE AS NOTED COTTONWOOD+IDA DEVELOPMENT moLscOVER— Civil Engineering DATE: os/z010 FIGURE VICINITY MAP n�0�NB 1.oe) 1 Geotechn/ca Engineering I nwRE 1.DWc I PRO.ECT ERdNEER:LSE DRAWN BY:LDr A% A D B07.EMAN,MONTANA Land Surveyingc DESONED BY: LSE KE WED BY:LSE AOL revel128 : : I jo k 109 1 o. 0 C QTa .0 1.. Bozeman F(sh Tech QT° PROJECT SITE :A COTTONWOOD + IDA ,-0..: to cb / �' •'�,4;,Mounte n r DEVELOPMENT 00 fipr I r 10.00 1 QTa ►55 � / ••550 SEC. 6, T2S, R6E, 191 GALLATIN COUNTY smw AL Ts Ts/ o b 1 op All 110 167.7 } 101.1 a f 300 1 9y z 165 a i< 000 5150 V3 W r5 A k S P 0ALI _ a _ 0 v LEGEND 0 QTa = ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS N (QUARTERNARY/TERTIARY) 0 C 6000 12000 18000 Qal = FLUVIAL DEPOSITS (QUARTERNARY) 0 Ts = LAC:USTRINE & FLUVIAL DEPOSITS SCALE: 1 INCH = 6000FEET UNDIFFERENTIATED (TERTIARY) a 0 0 m BASE MAP: GEOHYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS & LAND USE IN THE GAL_ATIN VALLEY, s SOUTHWESTERN MONTANA; BY: STEVEN E SLAGLE, 1995 a COTTONWOOD + IDA DEVELOPMENT Civil Engineering '&LI FIGURE 2 Geotechnical Engineering GEOLOGY MAP Land Surveying . DDAT`E: 05/2018FttT 32 DISCOVERY DRIVE 718 PH0 E((406)`..S2.0221 .BFDAX(406)5825770 BOZEMAN MOI�TANA PROJECT g:18-054 f wwwalliedenpincenng.com a�.,,••w,,.•`•• FIGURE 2.DWG t • 4 f Ij PROJECT SITE COTTONWOOD + IDA 14 — DEVELOPMENT :., t . E ASPEN ST 4 . y N S. � � 1' 1 �. a TP-4. TP-5 W g z � > a ; a Z k � I TP-1 TP-2 E COTTONWOOD ST # `. APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY t . L LZ s ��h O• .r..I fir. low 4w O O DEPTH TO NATIVE GRAVEL BELOW EX. GROUND: 01 TP-1 = 4.0' TP-4 = 4.5' 1 TP-2 = 4.0' TP-5 = 4.0' TP-3 = 4.3' LEGEND + 0 0 TEST PIT LOCATION o 0 100 200 300 (APPROXIMATE) o U 0 ro SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEET s N a COTTONWOOD + IDA DEVELOPMENT Civil Engineering CEeNGINING FIGURE 3 Geotechnical Engineering TEST PITS 1YV'/ GRAVEL DEPTH Land Surveying DRAWN BY: GDF 32 DISCOVERY DRIVE BOZEMAN,MT 59718 DATE: 05�2018 PHONE(406)582-0221 F 406)582.5770 PROJECT #18-054 BOZEMAN,M ANA W .alliedengin I..... FIGURE 3.DWG Civil Engineering 32 Discovery Drive w z w TEST PIT DESIGNATION: TP-1 LOCATION: SW Corner of Property Bozeman,MT 59718 AUIED - Geotechnical Engineering Ex- HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (See Figure 3 for Approx. Location) eHorrrremrro Phone:(406)582-0221 ,3 ,� FT CS. ( ) n^ Land Surveying Fax:(406)582-5770 \0 Q 2 4 6 g 10 0 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS O{0.0'-0.8'}: Native Topsoil . Medium stiff, black; organic clayey — Dark brown. Buried topsoil layer. — SILT w/abundant roots; moist. O{0.8'-2.0'}: Native Silt/Clay 2 3 Stiff; dark brown; sandy SILT to sandy lean CLAY; moist. ` ` -`, 4 _-.- - Notes: -Appears to be native. -_- _ - -- _-- -- -Does not look like fill material. 4 0 ~0- 1-13 o O -No intermixed gravels. el o O o o ° o o c "Target" foundation bearing in -Unsuitable bearing material. ° ° ° 00 ° 00 ° sandy GRAVEL below 4.0'depth. 0 0 0 ° O po ° °t 0 0 ° ° o ° o O{2.0'-2.5'1: Native Topsoil (Buried) ° ° [Good « ° 0 0 0 ° ° O° ° ° Stiff-, black; clayey SILT; moist. Q ° ° ° clean cobbly, O ° ° ° ° Q ° 6 ° sandy gravel throughout. 0 ° From 4.0'to 9.0': some Notes: ° ° o 0 0 orangish brown,thin -No roots. ° ° 0 ° ° ° C ° ° ° ° banding(multiple bands). ° ° -Black color suggests it is organic. O Denser gravels than 0 Q° Q ° O O ° -Appears to be buried topsoil layer. o TP-3,TP-4,&TP-5. o o ° 0 ° ° o ° Dug a little harder. 0 ° O{2.5'-4.0'}: Native Silt/Clay Q O V. similar to TP-2. Q O ° ESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(cont.): Medium stiff; brown to tan; sandy 8 ° 0 n ° o° D o O O {4.0'- 13.0'}: Native Sandy Gravel SILT to sandy lean C.;LAY; v. moist. `� o O° ° ° o O ° ° ° O o O� ° ° ° Dense; brown; sandy GRAVEL w/ Notes: ° o Q__Q_Q__q abundant gravels(4"to 6")and scattered 4_40-------o-- -More moist than above. 0 0 o 0 0 ° °O° ° ° o cobbles (8"to 10"); slightly moist to wet.cd 5 -Less stiff than above. ° o Q ° n ° Q ° O -Lower 6"contains scattered gravels '0 10 0 0 ° °O ° Notes: -Unsuitable bearing material. V - Clean sandy gravel. ° Monitoring well installed (MW-1) -Denser gravels than TP-3,TP-4,&TP-5. tv c �. Casing Height=31" above EG o -Density is similar to TP-2. ' CISti Total Depth = 13.0'below EG -From 4.0'to 9.0% Some orangish brown, „ c o ° p 0 ° 0 0 ° o thin banding(multiple bands). "` Z 14 -"Target" bearing material. (n N N SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A BACKHOE TYPE: JCB JS130 Excavator JOB NUMBER: 18-054 TOTAL DEPTH.: 13.0' BACKHOE OPERATOR: Brayden Harris-Townsend Backhoe PROJECT: Cottonwood +Ida GROUNDWATER: 9.0' (on 4/24/18) LOGGED BY: Lee S. Evans-AESI DATE: April 24,2018 Civil Engineering 32 Discovery Drive z „a w TEST PIT DESIGNATION: TP-2 LOCATION: SE Corner of Property ALLIED Ceotechnical Engineering Bozeman,Ml'S9718 ¢ FW- na x (See Figure 3 for Approx. Location) 8 Phone:(406)582-0221 3 z �- HORIZONTAL DISTANCE(FT): a • -- •" Land Surveying Fax:(406)582-5770 0 Q 2 4 6 8 1 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS Dark brown. -- - Buried topsoil layer. 11 10.0'-0.5'}: Native Topsoil - Medium stiff; black; organic clayey 3 SILT w/abundant roots and some - surface gravels; moist. 2 -' __-� Dark brown. �_ --4 Buried topsoil layer. -- 2O{0.5'- 1.0'}: Native Silt/Clay Stiff; dark brown; sandy SILT to - . sandy lean CLAY; moist. -._ Brown to tan.-� � Notes:Appears to be native. q 0- -0- - o -.° ._ .o• o - �_° .- _ -Does not look like fill material. ° 0 ° ° ° ° o ° "Target" foundation bearing In -No intermixed gravels. ° ° ° ° �� ° ° sandy GRAVEL below 4.0'de -Unsuitable bearing material. 0 0 Good clean cobbly, ° ° o ° ° O ° ° sandy gravel throughout. ° ° O ° 0 ° ° o ° 3&1.0'- 1.5'): Native Topsoil(Buried) ° ° O O ° O 0 ° °, DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(coot.): Stiff; black; clayey SILT; moist. 6 Denser gravels than O Notes: ° o ° TP-3,TP-4,&TP-5. °° O° o O Notes: -No roots. O Dug a little harder. ° ° O° - More moist than above. O ° -Less stiff than above. - Black color suggests it is organic. o V. similar to TP-1. o -Appears to be buried topsoil layer. °° ° % 0 ° °o -Lower 6"contains scattered gravels. O ° 0 0 O O - Unsuitable bearing material. 0{1.5'-2.0'}: Native Silt/Clay 8 ° 0 From 5.5'to 7.5% some 0 0 O{4.0'- 13.0'}: Native Sandy Gravel Stiff, dark brown;sandy SILT to ° ° ° orangish brown,thin Dense; brown sandy GRAVEL Gravel sandy lean CLAY; moist. ° banding(multiple bands). ° ' O ° o ° ° (� abundant gravels(4" to 6")and scattered SO{2.0'-2.5'}: Native Topsoil(Buried) ° ° ° O ° O o o °a° O ° cobbles(8" to 10"); slightly moist to wet. Stiff; black; clayey SILT; moist. 0 O ° O ° ° ° Notes �• O 10 -1-- -o- -0---4 o c---a-b-----Q "Clean" sandy gravel. l9 U — a. 6 {2.5'-4.0'}: Native Silt/Clay o - � Medium stiff, brown to tan; sandy ° Monitoring well installed(MW-2) - Denser gravels than TP-3,TP-4,& TP-5. SILT to sandy lean CLAY; v. moist. E ti Casing Height=36"above EG ° -Density is similar to TP-l. cn Total Depth= 13.0'below EG -From 5.5'to 7.5% Some orangish brown, c o thin banding(multiple bands). M Z 14 -"Target" bearing material. SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A BACKHOE TYPE: JCB JS130 Excavator JOB NUMBER: 18-054 TOTAL DEPTH: 13.0' BACKHOE OPERATOR: Brayden Harris-Townsend Backhoe PROJECT: Cottonwood +Ida GROUNDWATER: 10.0' (on 4/24/18) LOGGED BY: Lee S.Evans-AESI DATE: April 24,2018 _ Civil Engineering 32 Discovery Drive w z W w TEST PIT DESIGNATION: TP-3 LOCATION: Near Center of Property iEC Bozeman,MT 59718 E—• "') ALLIED Geolechnical Engineering ¢ �— 0. x (See Figure 3 for Approx. Location) ENOINEFRINo a Phone:(406)582-0221 3 Z AF-, HORIZONTAL DISTANCE(FT): o Land Surveying Pas:(406)582-5770 Q 2 4 6 8 10 0 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS 1Q 10.0'-0.8'}: Native Topsoil Medium stiff; black; organic clayey - - Dark brown. _�,' 2 — Buried topsoil layer. — SILT w/abundant roots; moist. 2 2Q10.8'-2.0'}: Native Silt/Clay 3 Stiff; dark brown; sandy SILT to _ sandy lean CLAY; moist. Notes: _ - _ ---•_ --- _ -- ..--._ -- �:`.� —_4_-_ _ L___, -- `�1 -_.` �- .- `-� 1- Brown to tan. -Appears to be native. -Does not look like fill material. 4 -No intermixed gravels. ---_ ,--_ _ __ -- _ ___--o__ __ --___ __ --_,._ __;•-�_ __. -Unsuitable bearing material. ° ° 00 ° 00 ° "Target" foundation bearing in 0 O Good "clean" cobbey, o sandy GRAVEL below 4.3'depth. 3Q(2.0'-2.7'): Native Topsoil (Buried) Q ° ° sandy gravel throughout. ° ° Q , Stiff; black; clayey SILT; moist. ° ° ° O ° ° ° ° 0 ° ° 6 ° ° 0 0 ° �0 ° O From 7.0'to 9.0% some Notes: orangish brown thin 0 0 Looser gravels than o ° o -No roots. banding(multiple bands). TP-1 &TP-2. Dug ° -Black color suggests it is organic. ° a little easier. Similar O° Q °° 0 p o Q °` O o ° -Appears to be buried topsoil layer. , , o o to TP-4&TP-5. 0 ° o 012.7'-4.3'}: Native Silt/Clav Q O � ° o 0, 0 Q O o DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(cont.): Medium stiff; brown to tan; sandy 8 ° ° U ° ° O p ° o ° ° 0 SILT to sandy lean CLAY; v. moist. a o o 0 o a o o 0 ° a o O{4.3'- 13.3'}: Native Sandy Gravel ° 0 O a ° q0 ° ° ° Dense; brown; sandy GRAVEL w/ Notes: O ° 0 ° O� 0 O a Q abundant gravels(4" to 6")and scattered - More moist than above. - _ -a-a-�-v---=------- cobbles(8" to 10"); slightly moist to wet. 011 - Less stiff than above. cd ° ° a ° a O ° - Lower 6"contains scattered gravels '6to ' ° aO O ° O o a Notes: -"Clean"sandy gravel. - Unsuitable bearing material. a. Monitoring well installed (MW-3) -Gravels are not as dense as TP-1 &TP-2. to Casing Height=27" above EG ° -Density is similar to TP-4&TP-5. Total Depth= 13.3'below.EG -From 7.0'to 9.01: Some orangish brown, 8, c ° o ° O O ° o O o thin banding(multiple bands). z -14 "Target" bearing material. (n SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A BACKHOE TYPE: JCB JS130 Excavator JOB NUMBER: 18-054 & o:� TOTAL DEPTH: 13.3' BACKHOE OPERATOR: Brayden Harris -Townsend Backhoe PROJECT: Cottonwood + Ida GROUNDWATER: 9.25' (on 4/24/18) LOGGED BY: Lee S.Evans-AESI DATE: April 24,2018 Civil Engineering 32 Discovery Drive Z w w TEST PIT DESIGNATION: TP-4 LOCATION: NW Corner of Property � Bozeman.MT 59718 (--� LL] a. �t)�tCeotechnical Engineering ¢ °' x (See Figure 3 for Approx. Location) Phone:(406)582-0221 HORIZONTAL DISTANCE(FT): Land Surveying Fax:(406)582-5770 e O U A 2 4 6 g 10 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS K. Gravelly fill material. O2 Buried topsoil layer. O{0.0'-0.5'}: Topsoil Medium stiff; black;organic clayey 3 SILT w/abundant roots; moist. - - _ _- - _ _ - _ - _ _- 2 Dark brown.~ ` q y y Buried topsoil layer. L 2O{0.5'- 1.0'}: Random Fill - - - - - � .—-_ '�_ _ - Medium stiff; dark brown; sandy SILT w/intermixed gravels; moist. b • Notes: OW -0-0-0�:`- _ - It is fill material based on gravels. Brown to tan. .- 6 "Target" foundation bearing in -Not as clean and gravelly as TP-5. 4 _�_ __._ `- w •� _ __� V sandy GRAVEL below 4.5'depth. - -Mostly silt w/some gravels. - - , -Unsuitable bearing material. ° 00 ° ° ° ° 0° O ° Good "clean" cobbly, ° °° ° Q °p° 0 0 ° 00 0° O ° 0 3O{1.0 - 1.5 }. Native Topsoil(Buried) ° sandy gravel throughout. ° ° O o ° Stiff; black;clayey SILT; moist. 00 6 ° ° ° ° ° DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(cont.):cont.Looser gravels than ° Notes: roots. ° ° TP-I &TP-2. Dug °0° 6O Notes: - Black color suggests it is organic. ° ° a little easier. Similar ° ° -More moist than above. ° to TP-3& TP-5. ° - Less stiff than above. -Appears to be buried topsoil layer. 0 - Lower 6"contains scattered gravels. 0{1.5'-2.7'}: Native Silt/Clay ° From 7.0'to 8.0': some o° - Unsuitable bearing material. Stiff; dark brown; sandy SILT to 8 0 orangish brown,thin 0 O sand lean CLAY; moist. banding(multiple bands). 0 O{4.5'- 13.5'}: Native Sandy Gravel y ° ° ° ° ° ° Dense; brown; sandy GRAVEL w/ O{2.7'-3.0'): Native Topsoil(Buried) -- ° -°�n-----�----°n�--------° abundant gravels(4" to 6")and scattered Stiff; black; clayey SILT; moist. Ooo ° ° ° 0 O ° o cobbles (8" to 10"); slightly moist to wet. cyi o 0 0 ° ODO ° �. O{3.0'-4.5'}: Native Silt/Clay U 10 40 O p ° 0 0 ° ° Notes: Medium stiff; brown to tan; sandy h ° ° o ° 00 ° °c ° 0 -"Clean"sandy gravel. to a - Gravels are not as dense as TP-I &TP-2. SILT to sandy lean CLAY; v. moist. a. ° Monitoring well installed(MW-4) - Density is similar to TP-3&TP-5. tio CasingHeight=28" above EG g - From 7.0'to 8.0% Some orangish brown, pi Total Depth = 13.5'below EG thin banding(multiple bands). Fn o Z ° -"Target" bearing material. (A 14 N N SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A BACKHOE TYPE: JCB JS130 Excavator JOB NUMBER: 18-054 TOTAL DEPTH: 13.5' BACKHOE OPERATOR: Brayden Harris-Townsend Backhoe PROJECT: Cottonwood + Ida GROUNDWATER: 9.0' (on 4/24/18) LOGGED BY: Lee S. Evans-AESI DATE: April 24,2018 Civil Engineering 32 Discovery Drive w z w cv TEST PIT DESIGNATION: TP-5 LOCATION: NE Corner of Property C�� @EP Bozeman,MT 59718 [--• f17 J Geolechnical Engineering (See Figure 3 for Approx.Location) Phone:(406)582-0221 3 Z a HORIZONTAL DISTANCE(FT): —� . ''c, Land surveying Fax:(406)582-5770 Q 2 4 6 8 10 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS Gravelly fill material. OZ Buried topsoil layer. O{0.0'-0.5'}: Topsoil Medium stiff, black; organic clayey 3 SILT w/abundant roots; moist. 2 22 (0.5'- 1.0'): Random Fill Medium dense; dark brown to brown; silty sandy GRAVEL; moist. Notes: __ y Brown to tan. - _ __ _ - ,_ -1 - _ - • -It is fill material based on gravels. - More clean and gravelly than TP-4. 4 o�_. o -Sandy gravel w/intermixed silt. 0 0 ° o o ° O O ° °c ° o O "Target" foundation bearing in -Unsuitable bearing material. ° ° ° o Good "clean" cobbey, ° sandy GRAVEL below 4.0'depth. ° ° sandy gravel throughout. ° o ° ° 33Q11.0'- 1.5'}: Native TopsoilNative T°°s°il(Buried) 0 O °° O o0 0 ° 0 ° ° Q o O 0 . oc 0 O ° Stiff; black; clayey SILT; moist. o Fs: 6 Looser gravels than o RIPTION OF MATERIALS cont.): ° ° ° ° ° ° Notes: TP-1 &TP-2. Dug -No roots. o a little easier. Similar °p - Black color suggests it is organic. o to TP-3& TP-4. ° ° o -More moist than above. -Appears to be buried topsoil layer. Q o° O 0 o Q oc ° -Less stiff than above. O o °Q - Lower 6"contains scattered gravels. 011.5'-3.0'}: Native Silt/Clay 0 ° From 8.0'to 9.0': some °o -Unsuitable bearing material. Stiff, dark brown; sandy SILT to 8 O O orangish brown,thin p sandy lean CLAY w/some sand ° 0 banding(multiple bands). O 0 66 14.0'- 14.0'}: Native Sandy Gravel pockets; moist. ° ° ° ° o ° ° ° o Dense; brown; sandy GRAVEL w/ Tol 0 o Q ° 0 0� ° o abundant gravels(4" to 6")and scattered O _ ° O ° c 0 O 0 _� cobbles(8" to 10"); slightly moist to wet. Notes: 0� �_oCk o------e4-------- ° -Very sandy in some spots. = ° O ° ° O° O ° Notes: o ° o ° ° ° U 10 ° O O ° O 013.0'-4.0'}: Native Silt/Clay -"Clean"sandy gravel. n. 0 0 c ° Medium stiff, brown to tan; sandy °' ° -Gravels are not as dense as TP-I &TP-2. tv a ti Monitoring well installed (MWMonitoringwell installed -Density is similar to TP-3&TP-4. SILT to sandy lean CLAY; v. moist. E ti. Casing Height=22" above EG o -From 8.01to 9.01: Some orangish brown, Total Depth= 14.0'below EG o thin banding(multiple bands). M ZQ or 14 ° ° 0 0 ° 0 Q o -"Target" bearing material. SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A BACKHOE TYPE: JCB JS130 Excavator JOB NUMBER: 18-054 TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0' BACKHOE OPERATOR: Brayden Harris-Townsend Backhoe PROJECT: Cottonwood + Ida GROUNDWATER: 9.3' (on 4/24/18) LOGGED BY: Lee S. Evans-AESI DATE: April 24,2018 SECTION 8 APPENDIX GEOTECH REPORT Part 2 RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 • 0 1 J � / I F u , G . U � � •. YAW. �. !}L t.� . � ti.• e J M � `��pt,�ri L ,• r�. •�!:fit a, .►r:i^Y" �� 1 • �+l � '�.�� �rr� 1 .J r•'> � 7 f /K r pp • 'i 'I `t•i'r•f f ' i y M L 1 ro la J S4 V N� i ifs 7 + �•�/ �'•. r 'l 1j1 y� 4= 0 10 Vicl a; A Ilk CP 17.1 ..rIV I� ._`~• ` �•� St•'1•ry•^ 71.tip.. • �•�•.� �1...1^ � '. , , , ,. CA C O � �'•lw 'mil•`L �'. �` .. , + .•'• (/� J Yam`"y. ` `..� + , ��'�, ,, ` `,,•`� �•• ��,, 1 ` V C 61 ` f LA _ � J -ram^+.•� •c,1,a 4, A� Tll' � co fpr It qu Kj `ter;' :.. - 'S� ;� '�,,b'�•'"�•' +, / ) � f:' � � lt •'.,�,� ..•11 i /i �''. -�`�,y `.�{ I` 1 ��'� 1. � ), `. :, { � \ _V •i ' fter•' .l_fy'a: � ' \. ,�r. 'p. � ,•, , .' '� ).R I �, - �'; •y. � _ � .�'_. ���� � ' • z`. .4, E ' J�J f .v 1 / �.�Y'•, '��f•` f-�l � mil.• � ' ,!, '^ Fv' �hY ��r,;,rl _..1 �. � Y •�.1.i•�' ram'�_. , r � yr _ ��^ " fay`_ ' a� '• � � air i C r-• tl `� - R s 4 .3 4-. 13.3 r�� ��„- = .ai,� �� '-T�� � ter. `/..� r`"'• '� 7 _fir:i•:� -.� ♦ ���7R `„ n_+'t+r a. � 'f_ .��_ - �, � � - ! '+ � � � z}� ,� Ill► "� '�!. _�M�,�y ��.�.. . L . �•,.r 1 •• , i � .r��,,,,��,,.j� _ ' , ��" V. �'`�z•C •� y. �•.-.,.P��`.�_�:� l �• ��'� � � ,''4� _r .w•- •..s;_�X `�.�.i- ti' - �' ' •. .'�X"7F, ',-Z' tA 71 \, � (, i >. _�����1���r _�.fit ,���`��-:�'�. Via''`'*,� t'` ��•L�,�y,,s•�.�'�.,... _�;��.;'�+s` ,''�.�� �� i ,� ' i• �- y~ �Z•�'�' },ft..l_ .+,�.S.� '. z�a,. •_t � � '.• .max" r ++LL . `�"" '^ r•i x •tip�;,,. _ 4. kr. IV --Wel0•rL°h•' +� 1 - „ M �r c �y,,�G7' _-r - f '� ti _i - ' ,�`� ... �T�' if f r �i�•' _.• ..•., ✓ .. '41 L� ��7•- tom•.-o _ a ' � .r _��. ,G +�. /I• � ✓. � � �`' ..may, .F � c .r',,«r :�?S.+l.�� a.b -� r ✓'_ - � --- ��; � �, ���'� - ,�� _fir, • I ?� c:, .. •+�7 :'�:.F.,,',��,+,�i, _"�,.-+ :.11^'��A. .. � !; , "'—•�—� ,���> l,y.� .r�c�• of � :■ � r r •- �(q i.ar{. P,"•� 'r���`•0.,;1,"�"!�+�, .i_� '� A, - v J; i .. --�.�aG' �.•.r.`..�» c �i� 'r�4.r �. -c� ,.1. 1�; '��`3�L:.j:�►..x� ��'- �. � _�'�'._ 'O''t` fy -y / r / � 4 i r i• � t IFIle r ` a a It 414 + fit. ?�` ;JI► ) a Y 00 At 40 ,''� • r( t ,, '' r , r � r h t01l .t� Ir 6-1 Jr Ir 10 } t �r rlt�,� � • r •� f tt I: `�(� ..� III,♦� �. f ••r'f • v v �• � j i J/J'7' S / r r '� r �� w .1 1 r ' ? ,,W' , Groundwater Monitoring Data: Summary of Wells Project Name: Cottonwood+Ida J ,'Project Number: 18-054 32 Discovery Drive Location: See Maps i Bozeman, MT 59718 Date Installed:4/24/2018 I ENGINEERING Phone (406) 582-0221 Installed By: AESI seRVrcas,INc. Fax (406) 582-5770 verse Pro} NOTES: 1) MW-1 through MW-5 were installed during test pit explorations on 04/24/2018. 2) MW-1 was installed in TP-1, located at SW corner of property. 3) MW-2 was installed in TP-2, located at SE corner of property. 4) MW-3 was installed in TP-3, located near center of property. 5) MW-4 was installed in TP-4, located at NW corner of property. 6) MW-5 was installed in TP-5, located at NE corner of property. 7) Highest water measurement to date in each well: MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 Date Time Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW below EG below EG below EG below EG below EG (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 4/24/2018 NA 9.00 10.00 9.25 9.00 9.33 4/30/2018 8:45 AM 8.03 8.52 7.77 8.46 8.82 5/7/2018 4:45 PM 8.06 8.68 7.90 8.62 9.01 5/15/2018 8:15 AM 7.98 8.65 7.86 8.56 9.05 5/22/2018 8:15 AM 8.17 8.82 8.06 8.78 9.26 5/29/2018 8:00 AM 8.14 8.79 8.03 8.74 9.26 Groundwater Monitoring Data: Page 1 of 1 PCzo� c.T s-�r� jJIT] . I . J-j COTTONWOOD STREET 94-2 8114i �-a a- g r o P ° D . '�'„ r N D n C t i .. m p 1 z p e t m m �" •�7-' 1 i"•4 p7�o owl CnEm s B6f1G OLE 0 600 1200 1800 YY VEST PIT ' r SCALE.: 1 INCH 600 FEET �xCerP�- �r•� ZOOS r; THINK TANK, FREIGHT BUILDING A :,. FIGURE 4 Civil Engineering 7s DISCOVERY nAlve SITE PLAN Land Surveying sommm'.4739711 CRAW Or CSP PRONE(4%)S 4= DATE: os/=S �,r��T �� 7�7 `F A BL EewD Gcotechnicnl Engineering VAX(4%1$M n7o PROJECT y: 65-°75,1 BOZEl AIN11V O , UGIN E Ine, • ..L��s Ci.it Cn�inrrrinp �2 DSebtt7[�mr . ALLIED R t B MT svta FIELD LOG OF BORING Geirnrrhniral Fsu utrrrin Phone one(4(406))a2-0�I ENGINEERING Land Sur.ry*.tg Fa.(406)sg,%M(l ■Uq.wC:UY .•K PROJECT. Think Tank Freight Building JOB#: 05-075.1 DAJ'E: 5/3/05 BORING: B)1-1 PAGE: I of I Bozeman,MT LOCATION: See-lap ELEVATION: See flap TOTAL DEPTH: 30.2 ft DEPTH TO GW: ll.S ft(+/-) DRILL TYPE: Mobile Drill B-61 CASWGIHAMMFR/SAMPI.ER: 2.0"O.D.Split Spoon Sampler S 140 lb Ham. MUM Steve Malkovich,O'Keefe Drilling FIELD ENGINEER: Craig:Aladson.PE,AESI OTHER FIELD OR DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS y ? v.7 SAMPLE INFORMATION e �'s 10.0,-1.51: iIID5pn"rVA SI-A Arilt!-PiAAloyQtatnt11401; •°• Dense.brown.silly sand%GRAVEL.slightly moist.(Bast Course) @00' 59 3,35: (SSS) 11.5'-2.71): k d`5li 'Medium harddrillingioIlt' Stiff.dark brown,sandy SILT,moist.(Original Topsoil) SI-B 'Smnodt drilling to 2.5% •� @7 2.2' 52 8.3ti •Medium hud drilling from 3.0'to S 0'. 0 (SSS) r 12.7'-30.2'1: Silt„Sgnd L%Cra ,tg$an�.,Gfp+qJ SI-C /1 o bledium dense to very dense,brown.silty sandy GRAVEL iosandy 03.2' So— 3 7!: Y° GRAVEL with cobbles from S-to 10".slighily moist to wet (SSS) K A SI-D Q269, 50• Z7% (SSS) •14otn 90%010.0'„seems of SAND and s(hy SAND 'Shgh(1)caster drill action from SA' to 100' From 9.3'to 9 S'.nted.deost.silty SAND, S I-E 10 'from 9.81 to 10.7 very dense.Sand)GRAVEL. '9 92' S4 4 4% (SSS) •Medium drill action From 10.0'to 14 0'. ° 0 �7- SI•F 0 0 = 11 9' so-: 8.9!'. e ISSS) 0 Q •F(Om 14,0'to 15.0',seams of SAND and silt SAND. S 1-G 'EaSICT drill action from 14.0'to 13.0% From 14 2'to 14,6%some slough.dense.SA;'D q 14.2' S4 MAT.(SSS) .Medium doll anion from I5.0'to270' c •From 14.6'to 13.7':dense.sandy GRAVEL wnh cobbles o SI•H o �PtfS3 C116.9' 30. 21.1•r: ° Set Clround Wait r Monitoring well(2-Schedule SO PVC) (SSS) 4 SI•I 0 o ti 192' 92- w,s•� 20 (SSS) 0 o SI-) ° (2r 210 io- 14 511: c ° ISSS) 0 0 SI-x ,r 24,0' so- 7.3% 0° iSSSI c SI-L It,26 9' 50• IS 9'0 ° (SSS) 'On a cobble from'.7.0'to 2b.0` 0 0 S1:K 0 O fr)`29.V Sp- 02% ?0 ...................BOtt:m o..... ..... .... ...... tsw Renewed Bv: •- (;i.il Engi.."rinF R M3cucen Dme ALLIED one 1.1."�'�71g P FIELD LOG OF BORING , r:tntethnieaf EnLinerrinY Phan!(a061C8:•02?1 ENGINEERING Land Sur,"ing Fav(406)W-s770 PROJECT: Think Tank Freight Building JOB f: 05-075.1 DATE: 513105 BOR1\G: Bfl-2 PAGE:1 of 1 Bozeman,A'I'T LOCATION: See NJap ELLVXrI.0\t: See flap 'TOTAL DEPTH: 30.0 ft DEPTH TO GHr: 12.3 ft DRILLTYI'E: ARobile Drill B-61 CASING/HAWMERISAMPLER: 2.0"O.D.Split Spoon Sampler& 140 II) Ham. DRILLER: Steve 1lalkorich,O'Keefc Drilling FIELD EI\GINEER: Craig Madson,f E,ACSl L OTHER FIELD OR O DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS a n'z SAMPLE INFORMATION a < C Gp L V :Zc LU c • �. � (0.0'-1.0'I: $2nd�Gf3>';) 52•A Riit)1AYAtU9n.9h�en__-_atiJlnJi Medium dense.brown.sandy GRAVEL,moist.(Base Course). �?00- 2S S.0% (SSS) •Medium drilling to 1.5'. -� 11.0'-35'1: 5?nd3ll( S2-B 'Easy dulling from IT to4.0'. Soft to stiff.dark brown toblad..wind)S1L'faith gravel intermixed. 02,0' 1S 16.0% slightly moist to moi$L (SSS) S2•C 'Diedium dell action at 4 0' Some 06 4 0' 52 10.0% Oriding at gravel contact. ° (3S'-29.i'I- SIB.Cantu SirarSl!25ioe1�. [�!S)' (SSS) o Dense to very dense.light broom to dark brown.tihy sandy GRAB"EL to D 31 o sandy GRAVEL with cobbles from 8-to 10".rnoist to wet' rr$I D OS< 3.8!: (SSS) 0 � o S2•E •Hard drill action from 9.0'to l l W. C 10 9,0' SO- 3.0% •Medium drill action from I I W ita ^ fSSSI 20.0'. 0 0 S2•F 0 0 _�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... rr 12 0 48 10 3S: e — (SSS) 0 •Fmm14.0'ro15.5;17.O'toIS.0%19.0'm20.0:22.0'to230% S2•G 27.0'to 30.0%seams of SAID(Alluvium). ,#-t3 0- 65 t3.7!: (SSS) o S2-H Dies: (a 17,0' 63 16.3% Set Ground Water s4onRo»rag Weil(2'Schedule 80 PVC): (SSS) 0 S2.1 q190, 58 16 6% 20 (SSS) •Hard drill action 20.0'. O 0 •:Medium to hard drill action from. ° o ° S2.1 20.0'l0 24 0' Hard cobble contacted e,27r 91, 1S3% 0124.0'. isss) •kiedium drill action fronr24.0'to 30.0'. 52-1: Cin 24 2' $3 t 14 ° isss) a S2•l. OSS) SUM 130uunrofborchvl!(fp 30.U' 1,29.2' 50, 17.OS: 30 ....... . ...............- ....................... ISSS) I 1 7� J Reviewed Bet F�- Gittt VOK."'wing 32 D.scmxq Dmc ALLIED `6) 2-022 FIELD LOG OF BOI.tING <:rotechnien)F,n6innring Vtpnc (aopj Stt.0_2I ENGINEERING (.andSuneytna rJ\ (406)$92.$770 ♦6w N[:l• .rv4 r PROJECT: Think Tank Freight Building JOB 05-075.1 DATE: 5/3/05 BOR1\tG: BH-3 PAGE: I of! Bozeman,NIT LOCATION: See Map ELEVATION: See Map TOTAL DEPT14: 30.0 ft DEPTB TO GW: 11.8 ft DRILLTYPE: While Drill 8-61 CASIN'G/13AMMER/SAMPLER: 2.0"U.D.Split Spoon Sampler& 1401h Ham. DRILLER: S(eve iNlalkovich,O'Keefe Drilling .FIELD ENGINEER: Craig Madson.PE,AESI L • 0= ?7_ OT14ER FIELD OR. C D.ESCRIPTI01' OF 1\1A1'ERIALS ? ✓� SAMPLE I\FORMATfO\ c �6 p0 L CA. xa ;;_U (0.0'•ISI: �qan4-Gans) S3-A P-rAN"tc1c1iaa9�Krrtl�rs .,. Daux.broun,sandy GRAVEL.shghtly moist.(Base Course) n 0.0' 50- 2'"', ISSS) •Medium drilling to I.Y. St!_n.Qf-sill SS a 'F.asydMiingfrom ISto3.0' Medium stiff to stiff.dark bmun,sand\SILT with gratel.moist. 'Grave)contact (Original Topsoil). 020, 36 2.ES6 'Mediuntddllactionlo63% IS551 SS•C Medium drill aetion at 4.0%Some 13.0%30.5'): Sap}f.Cra l C 4 1' 46 3 5!r grinding at gn%el contact. Medium dense to very dense.dark broun,sand%GRAVEL uith cobbles ISSS) from 8"to t0",moist to wet, S3•D @,7,0' 30- 3.6% 'Far,•d6n action from TO'to 7.5* o ISSS) 'Medium drill action to 12.5'. ° S -E 0 q?9.1 65 494.10 10 0 0 (SSS) n 0 S3•F 4 ef 12 0' z0 9 si: •Hard 611 action from 11.S'to 14.0' a o (SSSI •Medium drill action from la 0`to 0 S3•G -'4 01 From4.0'to7.5%14.0'to14-6'iI&Vto19.5%2).0'to22.0%23.5' Ca14.r 4$- 17.3" to 24.5%29.0'to 30 s':seams of SA.N D(.4,1lumm).. (SSS) O o a $3-H o Ca,17.0' So- N0 Rct. o ISSS) . J31 r(A 19-0' 76• I1:-,% 20 (SSS) S3-) 22 0' 50+ 12 2:, a ISSS) S •� ra 2,0' 5D• 12.4% I$S$) n o 'Hwrg up on Cobble at 25.0' t/ a a 0 41 11.3?. 30 i5ss) Bottom o-n fban4iole _.... Net9etsed Bt•: C in>{�� �� Cit it Enpinrerinp 12 Discovery Drive 4 Bozeman,NIT 5n716 ALLIED (eosrehnrrolCnpnetnnq FIELD LOG OF BORING PAMie (411t,)582.02:1 ENGI;:EERING I.anrl$urtryinq Fm (4061M-$,70 .�q•nurs ,w t. PROJECT: 'Chink Tank Freight Building 10B k: 05-075.1 DATE: 5/4105 BORING: BH4 PAGE: 1 of 1 Bozeman. .N1T LOCATION: See Map ELEVATION: Sec Nlap TOTAL DEPTH: 30.0 ft DEPTH TO GW: 12.5 ft DRILLn"PE: Mobile Drill B-61 CASE\'GIHA.,\I,IER/SAMPLER: 2.0"O.D.Split.Spoon Sampler cC 140 lb Ham. DRILLER: Steve 14alkovich,O'Keefe Drilling FIELD ENGNEER: Craig iladson.M AESI tr t v- ~1z. OI'1lER FIELD OR t- DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS < SA.MPLE INFORMATION � Z= %U O.D'•L0' $itl!�R�ly ClAi'C1 S4•A D 1 n 1 t' htc ' Dmtc,brown,silty sandy GRAVEL,slishds mist.(Base Course) C0,00. 40 4 21: (1.0`-L0'1:�rganit Silh�1agTopso (SSSI •\ledium dnlling to 1.0'. Stiff,dark brats n to black.organic silty CLAY topsoil,m0151 S4.8 'Easy diilling from 10' to 3.5' 12.0'•4.0'): SHI SIrtd ro_tiaAdyUJ Lr 2 1• 50 5.8m -Gravel comet at 3.5'. Medium dense,dark brown.silty SAND to sandy SILT with gravel. ISM 0 0 slightly moist. •Harder at 4,0%Some grinding. 4.0 30- 14.7•d .° (SSS) Medium drill action to 5.0'.Some (4.0'•27.0'I: CpndRGr�re( cobbles. Medium dense to dense,brown to dark brown.sandy GRAVEL with cobbles S4.D 'Easy to medium drill action from 5 0' o from S-to 10".slightly moist to wet(Alluvium). r 7.0' 50t 3.5% to 20.0'. o (SSS) ° S4•E y 9.0 so- 3.6% 10 (SSS) n 0 O SI.F ° 0 . . . . . . . .. . ...M. . . . . . . . -( 50 5 6Ye o (SSSjSS{ S4•G •From 6.0'to 7.0':90 w 10 0%13.0'w 15.0%16.0'to 17.5':19.0' !@ 14 1' 30» 11.0% to 19.S':22.0'to 2-1.5%seams of coarse SAND. (SSSI 0 SA-H \Dies:, La ITT' S0- 12.4% Set Ground Water 4loniroring Well(2-Schedule 80 PVCL (SSS{ aa.190, 64 13.2% 20 0 o jSS$) •Medium dnll action from 20 0'to n 220'. 0 0 S-14 ° 6220' 00 2034 a (SSSI 0 544: 0 C F;24 0' SO- 18 1% Cobbles from 24.0'to?6 0` '.SSSI Q o •Easy dnlhng from 27 0'to 29 2• a 127.0'-30.0'1: Saj0j_S7(loAII[q.Sgn0 Mcdiuns deitse to sn0:brown.sandy SILT 10 silty SAND.wet yl•L Ei.29.I' 40 16.91: 130.0'•30.7'l: CjILt_Cr?tely,Cand (SSSI 'Auger ranee out encased in sandy Sll T 30 Medium dense,dart;brown to black,siha gravely SAND wet slid itascneounlered at the boitoni of ..................... __ the borcholr. Botminofbotchoic ji;i0 i Revictted 8y: ONO t:gginreritg 22 Dismer5 Dti.e $971 ALLIED Phw*(4W) .022 FIELD LOG OF BODING Geowcl.niral knrinrerit) Phone(�D6)$Ci•0221 ENGINEERIKG lAndSur.r�ltlg Fa.(406)522.$770 PROJECT: Think Tank Freight Building JOB#: 05-075.1 DATE: 514105 BORING: 13H-5 PAGE: 1 of 1 Bozeman,NIT LOCA11ON: See Map ELEVATION: See Nlap TOTAL DEPTH: 30.0 ft DEPTH TO GW: 13.5 ft y+/-) DRILL WPE: Mobile Drill B-61 CASING(HAMMER/SA.MPLER: 2.0"O.D.Split Spoon Sampler&- 140�b Ham. DRILLER: Steve Malkovich.O'Keefe Drilling FIELD ENGINEER: Craig Nladson,P1E,AESI 0"fNER FIELD OR L o DESCRIPTION OF,\4ATERIAIS z> ✓z SAMPLE INFORMATION �-' L3 '✓�-" z o 5 U {00'-I.0'): Sandy�ta�ct SS-A �illlin�elcl(9nQtns7± ti92T ^ Medium dense,brown,sandy GRAVEL,slighth moist.(Rase Course) 07 00- 42 3.7% 11.0'-2,01): Qr�;alt }h1 a�tq�gnd. 1 (SSS) 'Medium dolling to 10. Stiff,dart,brown,organic silty CLAY to sandy SILT w'/seal gtavd,moist SS•B -Easy dnitin=from 1.0'toa.C'. •Medium dnT(action from_0'to90'. ^^ (2.0'-4.0'): .S,.a�rd ;ilt V120- 33 6V. Stiff,dart brown.sandy SILT with frravvi,moist (SSS) SS-C •Some cobbles encountered Moten £40' SO. 4'N 5 Wand 95'. c (SSS) ° Dense,brown to black,sandy GRAVEL with cobbles as lute as V.moist S5-D ° to wet @ 7.0' 501 23% C (SSS) o SS-E f 90' SO- 5.2! 'Slow advancervent orauget from 9 S' 10 0 0 (SSSI to 12.0'. 0 SS•F ° .T.;c ?12.0' IS$ O ° ° . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. �aZ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (SSSI ° — 55•G O •From 17.0'to 19.0:19.0'to?0.0':22.0'to 23.0'.24 0'to 27' Ef 14 0' SO• 9 613 seams of coarse SAND(Allumm). (SSS) 'Faster auger advaneeme»t front 14.0' to I£.0'bruise of u sd seams 0` ° S5-H �9tSi M 17,0' 63- 11,7,- (SSS) Generally true cobbles than to pre.ious boreholes •Medium to easy auger ad%incrnem ° S5.1 from IS 0'to 20.0' Ginding through 47102' SS• 19.1!e same cobbles 70 (SSS) n 0 0 $54 ° G220' so, 15.$% (SSSI ° 55•I; (SSSI 55.1 rz 270' ° (SSS) 0 ° SS•id 0 it 291' 27 21.61: (SSS) 30 •kasy dn11 action from 3;1Vto 33.0% yledwrrt s:iiT to viIT.brown.sand;SILT wct bottom nfb.rreholt�a 330' Test Pit Designation: TP-1 !��C Cldl►.atineerint �. C 0 `i 9 IMrrman,MT 5n715 tC Q) Q � t':ro,rrAalral►:ntlntrAop� C E .- Horizontal Distance in Feet Location: See Ma ALLIED PM,nr Irro►se2•n221 o CL �' P lNGIYt]:ttlNl+ land Sorvrgiut Fax (NID)192•$770 u (� N . • O 2 4 C S 10 Description Of Materials o `a`'� „; • .�'— l.3' .'•OO•. •.q, QO•_ ..Q� yO.. e.v qv•. - i Tedium dense; brown: sandy n• _ �n GRAVF;L;slightly moist: (Tlase course). 2 2 Stiff; black;organic silty CLAY ; f bf �.�✓.� � f. `' r topsoil; moist; (Original topsoil). � / , f: Stiff; brown;sandy SILT with gn4.0 4 0' ,�' D. gravel; moist. (Nucko p. �. .�. �. O Q Medium dense; reddish brown; <7 O O O d C sandy GRAVEL with rounded CO C:> a.' cobbles up to 4"inches in dia.; G slightly moist to moist(Alluvium). 8 10 -=r a I Surface Elevation: N/A Backhoe Type: John Deere 31OG Job Number: 05-075.1 Total Depth: 6.0' Backhoe Operator: Mike -Townsend Backhoe Project: Think Tank Groundwater: Dry Logged by: CRM Date: 05/16/05 �� CIS:1►.n�Inr�rinR 1011 „^sypc^ 2 a� v Test Pit Designation: TP-2 narrnun.At7 So71S Cfl N Q ALLIED ('ewnChnlcvli:wpin�srSn� �,r 1� %I 5 715 M o F Q Horizontal Distance in Feet Location: see map ILKCi1NF.M.li 11Y(i lend$vrre�lnl! Fa.(4n6)582-SM o V U) 0 ••�• 0 2 4 6 $ 10 Description Of Materials 'n ' -' "- ^ ' ' ° °• '' "'°• =a ' °= , .off•. •.n� - , .off•. •:o�.•O.o`.. •.n>• ' 'OG.• - .;�. 1OU.0`1.3 0.. .0:'0 A; t,:'O �•�;:,:'c� "t�;:d,,:'t� Medium dense; brown; sandy • GRAVEL; slightly moist; 2. (Base course). 2 r r � %• %rr/J�r ;r rir�i r��� �' i r r-- 2 I X- 1.8' Stiff: dark brown to black; organic ' silty CLAY with gravel; moist; • (Originallopsoil). � G � � � O l.t;'_2.8' 4 Q. �. Stiff; brown;sandy STI;t with �' �' (0. gravel and scattered cobbles; moist. a Q a 0 O 2.8 -6.Q_ O Q Mcdium dense. reddish brown; O•d.O.�.G7 sandy CRAVEL wish cobbles up to _ 4" inches in dia.; occasional cobbles up to R•' in din.; slightly moist; (Alluvium). 8 n S 10 tZ Surface Elevation: N/A Backhoe Type: John Deere 31OG Job Number: 05-075.1 Total Depth: 6.0' Backhoe Operator: Mike -Townsend Backhoe Project: Think Tank Groundwater: Dry Logged by: CRM Date: 05/16/05 101 r,Main.Suite � ~-' in Test Pit Designation: TP-3 ,�;�J ,� (-rat Enetoeerinq ALLIED Camct We Fnelr,earinq R o E tZ Horizontal Distance in Feet Location: See Map rVOINF"ING Land Surreylne 1;m (4001582.5770 c (� Iv 1(] Q 2 4 6 8 Description Of Materials °' O1 SGU�l.U• O '�-o.'0 .�� 'C1••o o: o.aon Q^o..�!•:o. '..G.�4D�hh-�°.A. Kedium dense;brown; sandy GRAVI~L; slightly moist; 2 (Rase course). 2, Stiff; black; organic silty CLAD topsoil; moist: i "f �/,� i% /�" i` X. (Original topsoil). p.�.O.�. .Q.O.�.o.<.0 5)-n p O?"3.�3 JSe to;4.0' 4 p .O -O •O•' •O x tnllereo Medium stiff;dark brown;sandy S1121' to sandy CLAY with gravel Q'p'd'4'CZ>•� 4Q,'�'<Z) <Z' and cobbles; moist; o a I (Transition Layer). O 3:5�k2 6 Medium dense; reddish brown; sandy GRAVEL with cobbles up to 4"inches in dia.;scattered cobbles up to 8" in dia.; moist; (Alluvium). 8 i r�• 10 c. Surface Elevation: N/A Backhoe Type: John Deere 31OG Job Number: 05.075.1 Total Depth: 6.01 Backhoe Operator: Mike -Townsend Backhoe Project: Think Tank Groundwater: Dry Logged by: CRM Date: 05/16/05 l Mam.snrltA lot l' a? a Test Pit Designation: TPA cc.il Enpl�arMe C v Fk»!n an.M T c0T1 S (D (t) Q r . �Crrvicchnkal l:n InrrrinR Ah,L1Ei� ^hr,a.,•,�a?.^221 o E Q Horizontal Distance in Feet —� Location: See Map Hraeslra��nl I nn s...ggne Fay 16tY•1 SRZ S7To o C J (n 0 2 4 6 8 10 ILI- Description Of Materials -nn �`�;•• •nC, %•.� - e•`e�• - ego.•. • ;}��. 04.0'7 1.0' C1, •�o:'O ��. 'G.'„-a.'(C� :o- 0,'0 o.'ta:�• -Cl;•�o:'��:.. Medium dense; brown: sandy GRAVEL;slightly moist; 2 (!take course). 2 Q IA' 2.0. �����'O3 Stiff;black; organic silty CLAP � topsoil; moist; - -(Original topsoil). d.o.QG. $a-A • Medium stiff; brown with significant snit deposition;sandy SILT with gravel and scattered cobbles; moist. Medium dense; reddish brown; 6 sandy GRAVEL,with cobbles up to 4" inches in din.;scattered cobbles up to A" in dia.; siltier in uppermost I'of layer; moist. 3 A P r S. G Surface Elevation: N/A Backhoe Type: John Deere 310G Job Number: 05-075.1 Total Depth: 6.0' Backhoe Operator: Mike-Townsend Backhoe Project: Think Tank Groundwater: Dry Logged by: CRM Date: 05/16/05 Y'� P AL�1ED ENGINEERING SERVICES,M. 410i rse Pr LIMITATIONS OF YOUR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS ARE PROJECT AND CLIENT SPECIFIC Geotechnical investigations, analyses, and recommendations are project and client specific. Each project and each client have individual criterion for risk,purpose, and cost of evaluation that are considered in the development of scope of geotechnical investigations, analyses and recommendations. For example, slight changes to building types or use may alter the applicability of a particular foundation type, as can a particular client's aversion or acceptance of risk. Also, additional risk is often created by scope-of- service limitations imposed by the client and a report prepared for a particular client (say a construction contractor) may not be applicable or adequate for another client(say an architect, owner, or developer for example), and vice-versa. No one should apply a geotechnical report for any purpose other than that originally contemplated without first conferring with the consulting geotechnical engineer. Geotechnical reports should be made available to contractors and professionals for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions, such as those interpreted in the exploration logs and discussed in the report. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE Geotechnical conditions may be affected as a result of natural processes or human activity. Geotechnical reports are based on conditions that existed at the time of subsurface exploration. Construction operations such as cuts, fills, or drains in the vicinity of the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations may affect subsurface conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical report. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE The site exploration and sampling process interprets subsurface conditions using drill action, soil sampling, resistance to excavation, and other subjective observations at discrete points on the surface and in the subsurface. The data is then interpreted by the engineer, who applies professional judgment to render an opinion about over-all subsurface conditions. Actual conditions in areas not sampled or observed may differ from those predicted in your report. Retaining your consultant to advise you during the design process, review plans and specifications, and then to observe subsurface construction operations can minimize the risks associated with the uncertainties associated with such interpretations. The conclusions described in your geotechnical report are preliminary because they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploration and sampling are indicative of actual 0 0 • • conditions throughout a site. A more complete view of subsurface conditions is often revealed during earthwork; therefore,you should-etain your consultant to observe earthwork to confirm conditions and/or to provide revised recommendations if necessary. Allied Engineering cannot assume responsibility or liability for the adequacy of the report's recommendations if another party is retained to observe construction. EXPLORATIONS LOGS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE REPORT Final explorations logs developer by the consultant are based upon interpretation of field logs(assembled by site personnel), field test results, and laboratory and/or office evaluation of field samples and data. Only final exploration logs and data are customarily included in geotechnical reports. These final logs should not be redrawn for inclusion in Architectural or other design drawings, because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. To reduce the likelihood of exploration log misinterpretation, contractors should be given ready access to the complete geotechnical report and should be advised of its limitations and purpose. While a contractor may gain important knowledge from a report prepared for another party,the contractor should discuss the report with Allied Engineering and perform the additional or alternative work believed necessary to obtain the data specifically appropriate for construction cost estimating purposes. OWNERSHIP OF RISK AND STANDARD OF CARE Because geotechnical engineering is much less exact than other design disciplines, there is more risk associated with geotechnical parameters than with most other design issues. Given the hidden and variable character of natural soils and geologic hazards, this risk is impossible to eliminate with any amount of study and exploration. Appropriate geotechnical exploration, analysis, and recommendations can identify and lesson these risks. However, assuming an appropriate geotechnical evaluation, the remaining risk of unknown soil conditions and other geo-hazards typically belongs to the owner of a project unless specifically transferred to another party such as, a contractor, insurance company, or engineer. The geotechnical engineer's duty is to provide professional services in accordance with their stated scope and consistent with:he standard of practice at the present time and in the subject geographic area. It is not to provide insurance against geo-hazards or unanticipated soil conditions. The conclusions and recommendations expressed in this repot are opinions based our professional judgment and the project parameters as relayed by the client. The conclusions and recommendations assume that site conditions are not substantially different than those exposed by the explorations. If during construction, subsurface conditions different from those encountered in the explorations are observed or appear to be present, Allied Engineering should be advised at once such that we may review those conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. RETENTION OF SOIL SAMPLES Allied Engineering will typically retain soil samples for one month after issuing the geotechnical report. If you would like to hold fle samples for a longer period of time, you should make specific arrangements to have the samples held longer or arrange to take charge of the samples yourself. Allied Engineering Services,Inc. Page 2 Groundwater Monitoring Data: Summary of Wells Project Name:Cottonwood+Ida Project Number: 18-054 ) "; 32 Discovery Drive Location: See Maps Bozeman, MT 59718 ALLIED Date Installed:4/24/2018 I ENGINEERING Phone (406) 582-0221 Installed By: AESI i DeRV1 ES,'"` '' Fax (406) 582-5770 rse P'0 NOTES: 1) MW-1 through MW-5 were installed during test pit explorations on 04/24/2018. 2) MW-1 was installed in TP-1,located at SW corner of property. 3) MW-2 was installed in TP-2,located at SE corner of property. 4) MW-3 was installed in TP-3,located near center of property. 5) MW-4 was installed in TP-4,located at NW corner of property. 6) MW-5 was installed in TP-5,located at NE corner of property. 7) Highest water measurement to date in each well: MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 Date Time Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW below EG below EG below EG below EG below EG (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 4/24/2018 NA 9.00 10.00 9.25 9.00 9.33 4/30/2018 8:45 AM 8.03 8.52 7.77 8.46 8.82 5/7/2018 4:45 PM 8.06 8.68 7.90 8.62 9.01 5/15/2018 8:15 AM 7.98 8.65 7.86 8.56 9.05 5/22/2018 8:15 AM 8.17 8.82 8.06 8.78 9.26 5/29/2018 8:00 AM 8.14 8.79 8.03 8.74 9.26 6/5/2018 8:15 AM 8.10 8.72 7.98 8.74 9.23 6/12/2018 8:00 AM 8.45 9.05 8.32 9.07 9.56 6/19/2018 3:15 PM 8.31 8.96 8.21 8.95 9.35 6/26/2018 8:15 AM 8.52 9.08 8.38 9.13 9.59 7/3/2018 3:45 PM 8.50 9.04 8.35 9.10 9.52 7/9/2018 8:00 AM 8.83 9.38 8.68 9.45 9.86 7/16/2018 2:00 PM 9.17 9.69 9.02 9.79 10.18 7/24/2018 11:25 AM 9.54 10.03 9.36 10.06 10.48 7/31/2018 11:30 AM 9.89 10.34 9.67 10.37 10.76 n ;r Groundwater Monitoring Data: Page 1 of 1 MUM 0 APPENOM 0 NEED MANAGEMENT PLAN 00Y, VOKI,W000 GO Ca RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL 11 11 JANUAR``2019 SECTION 8 APPENDIX E TRAFFIC STUDY w .s COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL 11 11 JANJUARY 2019 SANDERSON ��•� STEWART �4 i M1 , IN v { i y l a J� Cottonwood & Ida Mixed-Use Development -; TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY a., hnu Project No. 06020.03 NTAiy,� prepared for: rr, b OpenScope Studio Jos1776 181h Street a ST San Francisco, CA 94107 rots ' 8 P prepared by: r7 , Sanderson Stewart 106 East Babcock . '� Bozeman, MT 59715 w; JAN 28 id IJ '1 ,J J D ' .TN : ;F _ January 2019 COMMUM iY OtVt c P{'T i SCAM DERSOMSTEWARICOG�►►1 ,�„-,"`''�.."'..� �-�`'"�` Yes h-•�=-~ �I y 'off N 0 S 3 0 N V S • A � RSO STE ART ' �i S N N W % TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ l SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ................................................................................................................. 1 EXISTINGCONDITIONS......................................................................................................................3 Streets......................................................................................................................................... 3 Intersections ............................................................................................................................... 6 TrafficVolumes........................................................................................................................... 7 CrashHistory .............................................................................................................................. 7 IntersectionCapacity................................................................................................................. 1 1 TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................................... 1 1 TRIPDISTRIBUTION......................................................................................................................... 12 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT..................................................................................................................... 12 TRAFFICIMPACTS........................................................................................................................... 17 TrafficVolumes......................................................................................................................... 17 IntersectionCapacity................................................................................................................. 17 MitigationAlternatives .............................................................................................................. 21 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................22 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 22 Recommendations...................................................................................................................... 22 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX B - CAPACITY CALCULATIONS - EXISTING CONDITIIONS (2018) APPENDIX C - CAPACITY CALCJLATIONS - FULL BUILDOUT (2020) APPENDIX D - TURN-LANE WARRANT WORKSHEETS APPENDIX E - OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT SCHEMATIC APPENDIX F - PARKING ANALYSIS Cottonwood& Ida mixed-use development TIS SANDERSON STEWART �'� LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 : INTERSECTION CRASH FREQUENCY/SEVERITY SUMMARY................................................... 10 TABLE 2: INTERSECTION CRASH COLLISION TYPES........................................................................... 1 1 TABLE 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS (201 8) CAPACITY CALCULATION SUMMARY .................................. 13 TABLE 4: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY............................................................................................ 14 TABLE 5: FUTURE BUILDOUT (2020) CAPACITY CALCULATION SUMMARY ........................................ 20 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE1 : SITE LOCATION................................................................................................................. 2 FIGURE2: SITE LAYOUT..................................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 3A: EXISTING (2018) TRAFFIC VOLUMES................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 313: EXISTING (2018) TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................ 9 FIGURE 4A: TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT.......................................................................... 15 FIGURE 413: TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT........................................................................... 16 FIGURE 5A: FUTURE BUILDOUT (2020) TRAFFIC VOLUMES................................................................ 18 FIGURE 5B: FUTURE BUILDOUT (2020) TRAFFIC VOLUMES................................................................ 19 Cottonwood& Ida mixed-use development TIS S N ARSON 57EW A RY QW44 INTRODUCTION This traffic impact study (I'IS) summarizes the projected impacts associated with the proposed Cottonwood and Ida nused- use development in Bozeman, Montana.The purpose of the study was to assess the traffic-related impacts that the project may have on the surruundin',transportation system and ro provide reca»emendations to miti,Tate any- such impacts.The merhodoh)q and analysis procedures used in this stud-employ the latest technology and nationally accepted standards in the areas of sire development and transportation impact assessment. Recommendations made in this report are based on professional judgment and these principles. SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The Cottonwood and Ida niised-usc development site is located on the northeast corner of the Cottonwood Street and Ida :Avenue intersection in Bozeman, MT. The legal description of the site property is Lors 5-28,Block 105,Northern Pacific _addition. In the immediate vicinin there is a wide varicry of structures,most of,\x-hich are single family homes. although there are also a few commercial businesses.The block to the north of sire contains Theory Hair Salon and other commercial buildings. To the cast of the site, there is Bell Plumbing and I Icatin"alon(y with a fcv\-sirne'le-family homes. 011 the block to the south of the sire there arc restaurants including Trecline Coffec Roasters,Wild Crump,and hink's Delicatessen,along-with other businesses including CS Motorsports, SAV Di""iral I�csi�rn,Live From the Divide,and Stella (foods Bed and Breakfast. To the south and west, the development is mosth residential except for the lArkind Mansion Bed and Breakfast. Figure I on the following page depicts the study area,including key :and the current site conditions for the development. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The site plan for the Cortoriw()od&Ida mixed-use dcvclopmenr proposes the demolitil m of most of the structures that currently reside on the site. ()nce demolition is complete,construction will begin on fire new buildings and the renov arion of the building in the southm-est corner of the property-. There will be one apartment building with twenty-three studio m units. Building rn-n vrill he a a,-lining facility Neirh eighteen studio apartments. aparrments and nvenry-three one-bedroo Building three-rill be a townhome structure consistin-1 of siy unc-hedroofn units ;,nd six rwo-bedroom units. The fourth building_,will consist of four one-bedroom units and m-ch-c t-\>-o-bedroom units. In total there will he four ne"r residential buildin(*s with '92 units.Building fire NN-ill he renovated and Turned into ,a commercial braiding with a ?.1-S square-foot f� orprint. Building six will be c"nsrrucrcd as a 28,681 square-ffi)or office building.The sire will also pr,,ride a 39,-22 uyuare- fuot undcrground parkin; g:aragc\vith ')h rc,r:al space. l'i«ure_' shows the proposed site layuur. .Access to the (:ortoMrood & Ida mixed-u',c dcrclnpnxnt Will 11:11'C one print-,try locsaiun. 'There will be unc <access to the undergr„und parkin,*pinwIe on ncC norrhwcsr side of the proper;\ off aspen Street. ']'here is also dialmmal parking(16 spaces) on the sourh of the propert\-aloriv ('ortonNruud Street and parallci parkinp, '1 G spaces' on the north and cast sides of ncc prol,err\ along.Aspen Street and Ida lrenue,but it a c\pcctcd ahsa mosr trips\rid .access the sire from the,garage. n Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS SANDERSON STEWART47 ao�� k r 4 i - } ,a�. •'` `%� �- �c�'`' � it - `�:i' i' .� '.S rt ��rl Tail t �!i _• -ft :,.���" ! .9 !,1. ' ♦r `���'�! `,. ��•. �:+� �.�...i'-0 0 tip.rlCr. •-. At j a iA At- or ,�' ':��.bx Sri s �.•- ,_. c .r � '' iI s •�. •i1'�� !� �x �• o-- r dor x x r Figure 1:Site Location Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS • R T E A R ''•,SAND SONS W T ASPEN STREET t w _ �,Ci TY R/wy .�. + 4 } 1 y•I�r1 'jM'!tt�+ t.T - ♦, 4 T -+-�•1 • ` w ' '4 {i r i rs � f 1 `-� :- �tea►s+ir.i,a�[... l 1� -Y-♦• YI•w � � �� eam essa••�r.r-fie—. ;'�.-` e. 1< "• e� POIR 3 � .r.,,,� � a'"" a i+..��• ° �+ •` +w+l.�i4 .� ' j ! � Figure 2:Site Layout Streets •I-lie hropOsed of this hr,)jcct site mill hive a direct impact On the adjacent streets and intersections. The f,11(oxin par,>,grahhs describe the exisrin area roadways that are m()st likeh-to be affected by the traffic vohumes ;encrated by this ncNN-cOnstrUctIN1. Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS • 0 SIl juauadolanap asn-paxiva npl pun pooMuovoD LiOUJ.lJljl LjJw,) Lit 1;). 1rn I(, ulna (oxi qnJ \j1:JllliJ .11llll-TI,t)j `{,.,"\rLi r Sl]»Tiq ull'.I\ 'ILI,I]s.\s uUl]l'..11j1S,rl_l J�,l.U, s LIl'•LLM/(,jj jO ml;) ,)III pull Spil! ullis ir[1(,TJJin11 >,J,CII� III()(],•\(I jl'•(ITJLipd lll' pil Lit: ,i: p,)ijisslaJ SI uluj� ,laal�S UIPW 'li(ILLi C-)(i OJ p,),)d,s p:1J,()CI t,ll Si ,lT,lll.i. 'a lll`jll'.(l i�lll'•1l'.CI J»TJs-uO Ju:l]JTL I.)nii pull. sx)pjlll,Ll, i,)m..Ts lj]T.\\ jv.)idL j j,l_Al'.(l lull-t,.w i' S..)tIN)x)q j7l' m )lj] Jl1TJ,�]Llr)T,j)Ili t)J nLIn1LnJIM,J j,ul'•JvTJ(;.\-,)Jp T,j llissm:)T,7J4N' 's")hls lj]l,(i uo Il_Al'Tn LIJI.\\ \1'..\\pr(m jl l.Al:(i T sr,p,)TJ` sl.\l'.Cj IIJT_\A Ur,l]IJST,I]LiT SIT it'. ,In;),) j ,liILTJ.A`' la,I 'Luli1S_\s 11Ol]l',lTjissl'.il J»3J, ,Lll:uylO�j jO.Vl;) .-)qj llllll sjl]1'pullis twut'.ntjls,l'•jl ll'u(I;JJCI?j s j.Cjj� glO(i.\q J,l•7.U5 jlaOj 1'.. St'. jl,7TjlsslljJ Sl ,li1LT,l_A�' I:III anuaAV epl 'Li(ILu c- :1(I()I p.nunssr. )(i ur-)JT Jn(I 'J1LLT1l p,),-) I, l,)],()LI ()tl Si ,,)K)tj jI 'J»T]", 1—wil".Lur.I lIJl.1\ SJJISJl]LTl Jl iiJull ,T,,Iljlll,lls l�.\T U;LIJiA\ pv()T jll\1'(I'Ir iLLU' ,lLll'.j-(,.\1J l'. Si'.1.I1101.1 PUT'.]:»TJ`l,l)O_\\u()]JU,) LIM\uuUJ:15T7Jul ,I] Ir, suUi,)q imp .\1L\1j1rt,T it, 1.101.1s V. si 1X)jJ`]LIOT,I 'LL7,)Js.\11,Ll(Ii r-n4l,sri) S lll'.Lly'ZOR jO.Ul;) )Ili l,ur sj,Tl"pul'J, Ili i111(11J)u114 SJ,CII� LIJO(j.1(j J„Tis ju.)(nT l' sl'p,)jTssl:jJ ST]»TJs Jut IT,j J.90JIS JUOJ4 tjdLU c- -)(i ()I III!.)AT Jll(j'J,),-vJS hUU.1111uJJrY) li(,lr.Jnuil Il;l:1L1s I,.-)J,O(I Ou sl �sllt)�j jU J,J_A\lljJ OJ TJJJlI j,Lll'•(I11):1 Li]I.,\ jlJ_ll'(I usu. smltll]llo))JJJTJ` ymiq;)Jr tij,LiJ I,rw )Ili jT]Iln ism\ pi.m. a1n1,_\1' 'al'jll'1�jlur llllll.,.\�' r.Ilj q y:,Oj(i-1,Tul suT,;,(j �ljr..\v)p!s I»]rT1:(I.,s-j,Tr_yjnO(i N- 'S,)j,Ts LjJ()(j ll().11JJtl pur (jln, Lj]t.\\ jilllll_1J q.)-rlil ) j,Lll'.,,illy_At' 1'I,I Li�.l•\U•l�j 'Ll((1JJ,lS h'.J1LLU hula-r).\1] jll_\l d V. ,,)w(o.)q hrt)T )Lj] )TILT.\\ llpj J1 Iullll]SI'.) ,lljJ (,] s,,)IIUIJIIOJ]I ',T,)jl111Ogs i,7_\rT< Lliu\I,rUT lll_\1 d jrJl(IU ILIIa-li\\] r ,u J,7lTJt Ll n1d I,]l.\\llt)1JJ.l,JI]ili SIT Jr All ICI Jll.uti jluU.i\utUl(Y) 'LLII]s.AS uOut'.11jissl'.i�JLlTJ, s LiI:LLI'VOR jt,.Air) )qi j,til' Sj1Tl'•Illll'.]> IN)UI:JIjTsslal iP,UU;J�LRIj ,.j.Clj� IIJt,CI_AC�JIIT], Iral,j 1' sr si JILut, j,()0_A\V0JJO,) 1.90j)s pooMuojjo) 'LILILLi c- XI M 11JLLT1'ISSI', XI IM-)it Jil(! 'JiLulj j,l)Lls jl)J,l)(I Uu sl Llllj i 's,lllls lll()(j un `ljr.,iv)pIs I]IT.IUUI j,)Jl'.Il'(IIS-I1.111.Aljnt,l{1! (,sIl' `i ITI1j j '7SL\\ pill'. Jsr,) -)Ul 11]0(1 Llt,JIJJa;i{lull (i n.-) llr uT urd jljjiuvd JI.l1J,-l1O,jj1\\l-m. l.1J xw;-O.\\t 1' ,1 tpm\ u()IJ )I Lit SIT )II'.LLTISO.1dLit' TOj LIJToI: s.)nuuu(,J pull JIITJS ,,!q Ii l.v1 Lloll IU SJ:Jl' ,u::?I(1 I,t't)T )LjjL 'ltl)JS A, uuLirxIIsS la:)JiiTJ, ,ul'Ll;llU(j jr,_AJI") ILIJ At JOIX-)IiOD L' pull SPjupuvls LIt,T;I'Jtilti,l'j?1rU((LyLII'_j S..i_(M Atl TUirlll Limp"., -or st' anuan V Aempe l8 l:.l;h jl'.Ul),7jl1sJT t' .\jllluul ,LATI, LL,(I,N' ,ll LILILLI C� )(I uJ j,JilT:1S,l' I(j 1117.) 11 Jgl(I '.mml l»,,)ds IIIJSU(I Otl ,l ).l,7ll i ',Illl, tj]t,(I LIO TIJ]tla j1L11)lLll"ll llllll i L11`lTl'•ll llije]rtl]ILUS 11U MIA\'jl'..litj.\J ,7u1'I-O A\J U lj]l.Al sm-i"Tutl( l jll't,.l IT 'J,I•AA:)u1IlUlJuOJ j1Lll'Illty.A� .1SIlt,�j.,�UI,St).Ll TI]j>;' '�Tllljlll,ll,l.l_Au_li +T.A\ j,i'(,T Ili wd jr.)I I.AJ .ltll'j -t,.\\J l'. sL' 'Illl;l.A`' `>llc)lj I,LTI'• I:1tl,7.A� IJlajl 1(� L;II_lli,l(j�,Oj(j-,llllll "I'l V ,liinJ(j llt)l]l,,s)ll'.U.l Ilj j II Ll�_A�' l�l'lji:1�pill, IT1U.l A\ l:I,j ull.vvJ,1(I].7.1j �II I;�.1j.:JT'•CulCr a;(9(;i' ,jam;IJCI jal.ta `t.j,'Jlt,l;l:(;t),`.^,.ljl,lS;l-j�IXn1i i'.hI :�:;" jlt u,.vvL'OJJt r) I,�sUUuT(l ItIJ all,,1.lI,TOtI aJJOu Ill]a,t1Ol1' >i,l.11'.t.l]; sr glu.l.l. ..1'Itr.� Ij,I,L'J:t,� ,7L'] c Il.;l?: u,Y:'s'g ht r'; �LLT. °,.?1:U� .,I: r). :?j�jl`r etj, ➢,l.At::; t' mill r-Tl'(I gh'.LLIs l: S�]Itl;lal;l iiliTj.A\ .l.lj,jill,lj, I-10li I,I(I:iro I`• Lj,'i.\\jll'•t)J J A't:.11� j➢'y(i.\J �iil'?-r,.A\J l' ,'V \PO(I ,l',➢r).;1,] ,hit,?JSZ jl\]t'J.L,J]ti Jlkl.l.j ljJI.AA lir)TJ11sJ•l;Lil �Jl >Llla l(I q�`.iJ;ll,ld, 'III.JS.A, LU,1Jl'1,j1„l::J �,�'..!> s Ul'.ililct,�j jt,.A s;) .11jJ ;11T1: til,Tl'•j�la'J, Iir,ul:Jij;s,l'.j_l jl'.LlOIJJLIiIj �.j(Ij�, �,tl(,U1'J.iO(slll'T.j,jt,.lullu.1.11'LIJ(j uui'<ur,j� iLIJ ljJt r(j \(I J.l?:JS Il'Jl,j 1' >i'jl�Tjl,slllJ Sl JILU� uILi,�• jaal,is uadsd f 1 VG�A Vic- N ®SN3C1NVS SAND�RSON STE ART STEW ART Through the downtown corridor, M in Street has curb and glitter and sidewalk along) bath sides of the road as well as on- street parking.The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Mendenhall Street 'Mendenhall Street is classified as an urban minor arterial bi,both MDT's functional,_la:,sificadon standards and the City-of Bozeman's street classification sy tem. Mendenhall Street begins at its intersection with Broadway Avenue as a two-lane t\-pical section with on-street parallel parking and curb and gutter on either side.There is also boulevard separated sidewalk on the north side of the road.To the west of Wallace Avenue, the n'pical section rem,-.ins similar,but with the addition of boulevard- separated sidewalk to the south. T1iis typical section continues to Mendenhall Street's ternunus at the intersection with 11 th Avenue. The posted speed lvnir is 25 mph. Oak Street Oak Street is classified by IIDT as a local street except between Rouse Avenue anc 7th Avenue,where it is classified as an urban nunor arterial. The City of Bozeman classifies Oak Street as a principal arreria . ()ak Street begins as a two-lane,paved street with bike lanes on both sides and gravel shoulders. There is also a pared niuld-use path on the south side of the road. This Apical section continues until the Walmart access (025 nines east of 7th Avenue) The road then transitions to a three- lane typical section with a two-way-left-rurn lane in the noddle,curb and gutter and boulevard-separated sidewalk on both sides until the 7th Avenue intersection. To the west of 7th Avenue, Oak Street has a fire-lane typical section with a center two-w-ay left-turn lane. The posted speed lin>it is 35 mph. � Peach Street Peach Street is classified as an urban minor arterial between 7th Avenue and Rouse Avenue and an urban major collector between Rouse Avenue and Plum Avenue b MDT's functional classification standards.The City of Bozeman classifies Peach Street as a collector. Peach Street begins at its intersection with Plum Avenue as a paved, two-lane street with inrermirtenr j stretches of on-street parallel parking,curb and gutter, and boulevard-separated side,,valk until the Rouse Avenue intersection. To the west of Rouse Avenue, the road is a paved, tvo-lane street with bike laces to the north and south, and on-street parallel I parking on the north side of the road.The road also has curb and gYutter with s:dew-alk on both sides. The south side has interniitrent sections of boulevard-separated sidewalk. The posted speed liner is 25 mph. ! Rouse Avenue a Rouse Avenue is classified as an urban nunor arterial by MIDT's functional classificatior_standards. The City of Bozeman classifies Rouse Street as principal arterial. Between Olive Street and '.Main Street,Rouse Avenue has a paved, rw-o-lane n-pical section with parallel parking,curb and gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the stree-. Between Main Street and Lamme Street, Rouse Avenue has a three-lane n.pical section with a T\XZTL, curb and gutter,and sidewalk. There is on-street parallel parking on the east side of the road,and varying parking ern the wesr. Between Lamme Srree,and Cottonwood Street,Rouse Avenue becomes a rwo-lane street with parking,curb and glitter, and sidewalk on the east.T he %rest side of the road has a gravel shoulder with varying sections of guardrail, intermitted parking,curb and gurte_,and sidewalk. North of Cottonwood Street, curb and gutter and sidewalk ends leaving only a gravel shoulder on both sides. The-)o-.ted speed linvt is 25 mph. Tamarack Street Tamarack Street is classified as an urban major collector by both MDT's funcri,)nal classification standards and the City of Bozeman'; street classification system. Benveen Front Street and Wallace_Avenue.Tannarack Street is a pared, rwo-lane street Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS SIl juauadolanap asn-paxlua npl pun pooMuollo3 pl)L'ilJJL'-1LUas si puu,, UL'ld asrgd-o.w aldwis L' tl]l:\\ Salrlado lL'U lS Jl��L'T] aLIZ-a)url n.Ty L'pLil',aurl uTnl-JgnTT/my ;)TL'Llti L: SL'Ll al Jsra aq.L 'curl-nTlp r pur curl ulnl-J}al/n1Lp palrgs L' Srq (laall�uTl.1v 'Slu;)wJ)-\OLU;iunTTIIJ I,aJJtT]JalLlil yi.\\,)uuj ,l tlTs l? sl'•Ll (anUa.\`7_1L'.1\puma)i61 Lp.lou aq.L '1ruc;is- J1}}L'Tl L' q]L\1 pallOJIUOD Sl lall UOT=JaslaJul.\L'.\\-aalq] L' ST allu;).\`' puu JaaTiS L nqL to LioIJJaSlalul :)q j anuaA d APmppoa8 / jaaals uipp/ LTl'.ld asl'.gd-o.AQ )IdLuis L' q)T.A\ aq,7 'Uol1JaTTp la_AL'TJ punogJSa.11 L' g7LV\.%'nx aUo -, TUuj-O.w L' -jo LnuuT�9:aq agl sJ (ixuiJ llrguapuaj�)r?.)l Jsa.\\aq.L'SJu-,)wP-\OLU<uluTn] p;)nj3isaTun qM\ aUrl )j,'iUlS U ST (JaaTJg jlrgtlapuaj�) .`0;)l )sr,) ags.'Purl ulnl-lgilT/nTLp L' pur curl Lum-Jjal pmuunisap r a.\rq yoq asno-d) seal ynos PUT'' LJJJOU aql'lrLlnTs :)jjjuTJ L' yi.vv pallonuoJ Si JrLll I, sl lxwl grqu,)puaj�puu )sno-U)o uor7JaSla]Lll aq L .laaals HPyuapuRH / anuaAV asnod '(]dal puu `nTg1 `JLlii'1l) sluauaa_l w,�UTuam 111' TO} S.AvO1113 al L1Jra LiO aUL'l r-)ui.Tmu;)aqs.'aUrl 91.113TV) pLJU n?UTlalU,) ali,Li1S r J_1L'q Seal 11F' 'S al lsa_vv puu ism ;)y Uo pallol]UOJ -dots sT JL'LlJ Uou N),S.alLll L' Sl (Seal]Sa.A\/lsl;a)1aaT1q q:)rad pur (seal L nos/g]TOu) )nu,)-AV aSilo-d jo UOTnxa-Tz)m)LIJ .1aaals yapad / anuaAV asnod 'Ur..ld asrgd-w,.a )1dwis L'Ll]T.\\ ;a)mlado lL'LTr?Ts JT}4L'll atl_L '(Jail puu `illy `Jgi,TT) SJUaLUa_\OUT iuruJni 11L'JOB s.\\ollr nal gJr.a Llo aL1L%l nLIlTaJUa all, 'SaLTrI nUl]iv) pLll; 3U11a)Lla alnLJTS l:a.\rq sisal 11V '1rLlnls Jl4)L'Tl r Ll7L\\pallOT]LIOJ Sl 7L'LlJ L1011�asTaJLTT.AL'.A\-TilCi� L', Sl (sisal )sa.A\/7Sl�a) laaTl� `1�lL1LLUP..L pLlr (S,`,al gJiloS/g]JOU) allLla.A�7 aSilo�jO LlO1JJaSJalul agL .1aaws >/apapcup1 / anuaA d asnod 'Z)11arT) pur punocl)sra lc)a sluaula.\c)ui 11114 )LlJ pTTLIJ x1i 'sulnJ a.vssnulad q]t.\\asrgd pun()ggxnos/punogy.Tou lua u-'). ()LLT hill L' of Sa UtiLlJ UaLp 11 'drp,).\o U111J-Jg iT pulloy,;ra pur sultu-]Pal pa)Jalold qJL\\ )srgd JLmw.)-ww llllj l: srLl iial 1111-TU5 aq.L 'pa1L'il]JL'-nuas Sl PUE UUld aSL'Lld-aalg] r L1JL\\ SalrTadO lrLliils :)jjjvll aqJ, 'JLlrl q:)v.mddL' aliLTiS L' srq";al lsra )y par, aLTl:l LITJll-11a1/1lTL1J a puu aLlrl LiTTI]-iq,i1T pa]rid'1sap L' sl;ll (JaaTl�>lq))dal 1sa.\\ag L -,)ui l LunJ-Jgi,11/1lTLl] L' PUl' aLiL'l LlTnl Taal pall:Ll 1Sap L' St;ll{,al ynos �)y alrq.\\ (J}p pur`1l1Lll `iq<`)11) 1LiaW,-)A W�iUTUT11) gJl'•l T()4 allrl paJuul iis.)p L' sL'Ll (;)nu;)-lV)snoa) al g1TOU aq j 'lL'LT is :)q.jw1 L' q]l.\\pallojiuoD si hill Uol1DaSTalLIT L' Sl In()pul" asllmd to um1Jaslalur all,l jaaa157 >/pp / anuaA d asnod 'luauJdoj.).vap.vvau aq).iq pv)udun aq.illrn i,)iod lll-\\pur ails luauTdl)l,)_1)p ag] 01 JLiaJL'IpL' aJL']rq1 SL101JJasTa]lil JaaT]S T(,IP.ui iiL111s1\a all] ag1lJSap Sgdl:liiL:Jt',d ii'UT.\l01101 )ql suoilDasaalul 'gdtu c� si=Tuill paads pa1s()d aql •ylr.";)pis paJrlydas-pTr.\alnoq purx)jjni pur qln:) srq Jllq)aaT1s )uv.l-o_\u P.).od L' sr, S:)llL1UU03�lJlul:wrj `mu').\\- tll` pLTl'• ailLla.\�' asllO21 Llaa.\\la�j 'slaplllogs la.\l',Tn sill alUO Pull la1Jn,`,'pM clln:) alp sas()1 ]aall�y�rlrtur._T.`anLa_\� asnc,�l pur. anua.\� »rlll'.1\ uaa.\\Ja�l sapls gJ()q u()Tal]n pur cpn�Lpi.\\ `� AVM31S N0S� 30NVS SAND RSON 57EWAR7 •��.� Ida Avenue / Front Street J he intensection of Ida Aventic (south lcL,; and l,ront Street ;cast,,.west lc;:_>s; is a thi:LC-vvav intersection that;s current:v unc"ntr„lled. All the legs of the intersecrion have unresrr-ictcd rurninr muN-rmenrs. Ida Avenue /Aspen Street 'I le intersection of Ida AN cnue (north/south lc;,,s and Aspen Street (cast 1c,r)is a thrcc-,vay intelsection that is curmnrl_v uncontrolled. AD the lc•tis of the intersection have unrestricted rurning,mo\-emenrs. Front Street /Aspen Street The intersection of l-runt Street !norrh/south legy and .kslen Street (west lei* is a three-wav-intcrscctiori that is cur--ently unconrrolled. .All the lc;;,s of the intersection have unrestricted turnip"rnovc111CUI. Ida Avenue / Cottonwood Street The intersection of Ida Avenue (north,`sourh legs and Cottonwood Street ;east„wc:.r legs,•is a four-\\a\•in-c•rscction -hear is currenriv uncontrolled. .A11 the Icus of the intersection have u:.restrictcd ru nin m-,vements. Traffic Volumes Weekday AM and P.M peak hour turning movement counts were collected for ncC intersections of House .peanut with ()A Street,Tamarack Street,Peach Street,and 'Mendenhall Street, the intersections o:Ida Avenue\\•irh I•rcrit Strevr,Asper >rrcct, and Cottonwood Street, the intersection of Broadvvav Avenue with Main Sneer, tr.d the intersections of I`r.)r.t Street-xith Aspen Street on Thursday,'March 29,dill/. In g,cneral, the\\•eckda\ leak hour p_•rio.is were fount: to occur f_um -:45 to 8:4i AM and -hill to ti:,ill RM. Raw count data was adlusred for seasonal variation using -hc Montana Department of "Transportation's seasonal adjustment factors. Figures 1.1 and 3B S and 9; s.,mtnarize the resulrin;,c:;lculare.l I•:Xisrin,r Conditi„ms(2015) leak hour turning,movemert Volumes for the AM and PM leak hours. Detailed -raffic count data worksheets are included in:kppcndi_X A Crash H story I lisro�rical crash data was obtaincd from MDT for the ;-vcar periud from 1.u1uar.• I. 2012 throuigh Dccc_i:h;r 31• _ l G. The data wa,, anal/c•d for the purposes of calculating,intersect,,On crash and sry centy :a:cs and evahrar n;: collish,n rv-pc rends. 'Tables 1 :and ?illustrate the results of thar analysis. Inrcrstction crash vacs were c.alc-ulared un the s-andarc hasis of crashes per million\-chicle entering, ,\MVI for each intcrscctiun. •t he \I\•I, intuit \\•;as esrirnared based c•n pallid-,rei historical ADT \•oltuncs frO M The MITI \\•chsire. Crash rates for the stud\•:area intersections rangc_1 .'tom 0.04 \I\ ];to 0 ;a1 crashes,MVI•.,while severity rates rangred from 0.04 cravhcs/J VI: to 0.64 era<h_�,°:,I\ I:. In orris ur h:,rli _rcyucncy a-Id ,,everir\, rho>c tarts arc rclati\cl\ a\erase for the current orlon t:1\ir„nme nr hasecM on con\ersatio�s a irll \Il7"1'Saf.n personnel. It should be noted rh tr MITT did not prov;de:!m•crash hisn ir\ at the 11Mrsecti,,ns of 1.1: Avenue m irh 1•ron- Strcct. \slen Street. ,anti Cotton,vood Street and t':;c intersection of l Front S%rcct \vit t Aspen Strec-t.The;C =tyre inrcrs:c:iun. \\-ill not be an:ti\•rcd in tilt'M-minder of-lie crash hisrorY section of this rcporr. Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS SANDERSON STEWART ao°� KEY ,� f r \; f ��, XX — A.M. PEAK HOUR (XX) — P.M. PEAK HOUR 105 248 0 y a 1 ..�.'/ • ' �� i/- - (131)165 0(0) _ t+ X ; ~T._`�J [ Jam=/ •r (3)0 —► t— 1(1) 41 ,1.• ' . .f:L '•0 •' _ eft; i 1 'sr ? f�'., t 110 275 0 ;, :- ..;;.•.., 1 •, ,�`�' � i�'�t r^ rTr •,T + (233)(257) (0) Y•� K Wit: �: n (— ]____(30)(451)(25) I � i (45)39, 46(42) M I`Yr (40)53. -► — 23(58) F y A}+ 12 289 7 (25) (392)(13) (51) 62 (403)(48) '� � 3 •fir- ` Dom(/• ' I . ♦ C f� �ti (27)15 -� �- 42(102) (� G. (88).79 '4 , 1(5) 1i � i r • 31 250 17 r TV (157)(265)(38) 7 A �, .�fjR;�, •� r 112 141 39 �� ,t� (�' � •>� i f '�i C�p�r'�"ir;�(�'1� .df� 566(21 41 r� r .' 42 260 16 4r u ��►"t 6 # ► 1..: - r �•Kf "�K!(`f'� t .� (79) (317) (9) rr web (481 (0) (140) 22 0 100 (94)4' 94(115) .� (647)475 —► t— 581(621 •` $ 9 i� Y.Y tom`;.1. ��w(�. �i'�. rt'Q t 0 0 ,§,Qr� Figure 3A:Existing(2018)Traffic Volumes Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS S A AR T E A o:D N SONS W RT dea, KEY • J` 4 ; r XX — A.M.PEAK HOUR (XX) P.M.PEAK HOUR 1 F ^ �• t � � •\ - . fir. ;f"ti ' >♦ s 6 g .. (4)2 —► 0(4) IP (24)10 o(0) ; ell Or (77) (0) w fir ' '�up s. 7 (24) (0) 10 0 r (17) (0) 8 - � (o)° (0)o 91 (2 (9) (0) a C" (0)2 J" 0(0) 44 (0)0 f- 0(2) _r ►Y� �� (2)3 C' 2 10 0 Figure 38:Existing(2018) Traffic Volumes Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS 51 SANDERSON STEWART '� The anah-sis of collision tope showed that the most common type of collision at aLl intersections was a rear-end collision (45o'o). The second most common collision t-j)e was a left-turn opposite direr tion and fixed object collision (14( o each). Two of the three total fixed object collisions were determined to be by impaired divers.The remainder of the crashes were right angle, sideswipe, and bicycle collisions (all 91 u). When broken down by intersection, the trend continues. The motif common type of collision at the Rouse Avenue with Oak Street/Tamarack Street/beach Street intertiectlons is a rear-end ci)llisi in (1000'0, 100"o, and 50'o, respectively). Both rear-end and side-'swipe collisions represented 5)'i) of total crashes for the ��lain Street and Broadway Avenue intersection,with the remaining 50°o distributed between each other tape of collision. The sideswipe collisions could be due to sudden lane changes made by through vehicles waiting behind left-turning vehicles on ,\lain Street. the intersecrion of Rouse Avenue With Mendenhall Street is the main exception where the most freCluent t}-pe of collision was with a fixed object (5000), but it still had 23o o Lear end collisions. The next highest collision type at the intersection of Rouse Avenue with Peach Street was a left-turn opposite direction collision (33°0). The collision analysis highlii;hts the high rate of rear end crashes throughout the study area.Typically, right-angle and rear end collisions are often the most common collision types at signalized and unsignalized urban intersections. Specifically, at signalized Intersections, there are several contributing circumstances that can cause a high incidence of rear-end collisions, inclucling inadequate yellow change intervals and/or the need for auxiliar\,turn lanes. Another cause could be high speeds and/or downhill grades on an approach, but those conditions are not seen at intersections In this stud\,except for a downhill grade on the east approach at the :\lain Street/Broadway Avenue intersection,which has the lowest proportion of rear end collisions. The second most common type of crash at the study intersections, left-turn opposite-direction collisions,could be caused by a lack of protected left turn phases at signalized intersections. The.Rouse Avenue/Peach Street intersection Ina have more left-turn opposite-direction collisions because the Peach Street(east/west) approaches are skewed and have high delays. It is important to note that these evaluations are speculative, and more detailed information about individual crashes would be needed to deternune exact causes for each collision. In general, the crash rates were quite small so it does not appear that there are any significant crash frequency or severity problems at the stud;-area intersections. Table 1:Intersection Crash Frequency/Severity TDEV1 012-2016 Reported Crash T e Rates (per MVE3 Intersection Crashes2 PDO Injury Fatality Crash Severi Rouse Avenue& Oak Street 14813 1 1 0 0 0.04 0.04 Rouse Avenue&Tamarack Street 13040 3 3 0 0 0.13 0.13 Rouse Avenue&Peach Street 13605 6 1 5 0 0.24 0.64 Rouse Avenue&Mendenhall Street 13250 4 4 0 0 0.17 0.17 Main Street&Broadway Avenue 14691 8 6 2 0 0.30 0.45 i Daily Entering Volume (DEV) estimated from 2012 through 2016 MDT published ADTs. Crashes reported from January 1,2012 to December 31,2016 r 3 Crash and severity rates expressed as crashes per million vehicles entering (MVE) based on MDT severity factors 4F! ri 6; i III„ Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS • SAND RSON STEWART 4®e� Table 2:Intersection Crash Collision Types Collision Type Intersection Rear End RiLyht Anele Sideswi a Left Turn OD Bicycle Fixed Object Total Rouse Avenue& Oak Street 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Rouse Avenue&Tamarack Street 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 Rouse Avenue&Peach Street 3 0 0 1 2 1 0 6 Rouse Avenue&Mendenhall Street 1 1 0 0 0 2 4 Main Street&Broadway Avenue 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 8 TOTALS 1 10 2 2 3 2 3 22 Intersection Capacity Existing Conditions (2018)intersection capacity,calculations were performed for the study area intersections using 5Ynchro, Version 10,which relies on the HighvvaN-Capacin•Manual 6th Edition (HCiNJ) (Transportation Research Board, 201-) methudololries. The J 101 defines level of service (LOS) as "a quality•measure describing operational conditions,,vithin a traffic stream,gencralIN-in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver,traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience." L()S is a qualitative measure of the performance of an intersection\vith values ranging from L()5 A.indicating good operation and loxv vehicle delays, to LOS F,,\vhich indicates congestion and longer vehicle delays. The results of the Existing Conditions (2018) capacity-calculations shoved that all intersections within the soulv-area operate at LOS C or higher during both peak periods except for the inrersection of Rouse avenue and Peach Street,where the east and Nvest legs operate at LOS E and Fin the PM peak hour. For the west leg, the 95th percentile queue is seven vehicles long Nvith an average delay of 86.7 seconds per vehicle. The east leg experiences a four vehicle 93rh percentile queue with an average delay of 3 ? seconds per vehicle. 'Table 3 (page 13) display s the results of the Existing Conditions (2U 18) capacity calculations. Capacity,calculation worksheets for each of the study area intersections can he found in appendix B. The Ciro°of Bozeman has expressed concerns of the safen- and traffic operations of the adjacent intersections to the park comprised of the intersection of_aspen Street,front Street,and Ida Avenue. .Addirionall\% the existing road\viN_sections of lda Avenue and Cottonwood Street adjacent to the sire are not up to Cin srandar&. Finalh•, aspen Street is proposed to connect Ida avenue and Wallace Ave. TRIP GENERATION An accurate estimate of site-generated traffic mint be made to anal\re the impacrs of the new Cottonwood and Ida mired-use development on the surrounding transportation sN-1tun. This studv-utilized Trip Generation, 10rh Edition,published by the Inrirute of Transportation Engineers (1'IT- which is the most widely accepted source for determining trip generation project)ons. 1�or the purposes of rhis stud, trip generation was calculated using various land uses including Multifamily I lowing(Mid-Rise) -Land Use 221,Small ()ffice Building- Land Use -1? ()tialin-Restaurant—Land U- e 931,and General Office Building-Land Use-1().Table 4 ',page 14; illustrire,, the results of the rrip generation calculations for this site. Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS Fil S11 juawdojanap asn-pax!w Op/pun pooMuo.No.D '91 purr1 s-),-id) Ht 1,lll'•\-f :IliLil,1 Lll h,,JP.1Jsil1ll OS1r. -ur, sJ,IOLI jw:)d J�(l },un 1C\• )qj TO) JultUL1 lssn J)gjr,.dJ .,Lll jO sJlntial �L1J.'sjTt>-\\]•,11 .\r..\\hnOT rur,.\}„lJs )LIJ O1 1,JL1?lssr �):[.m\]LI�LLiI!(lj,,.Ll},.,Sil-},�\ALi upl pur },OO,\\UOJJO,) �)Lll .10) SLIt.Tl }I,,JL'T�Lilil-�Jls `LlJr.Ulddl: STLll trls 1 lll1 j( iLld XjJ JIM, lIO1J11(ll11s11,diTJ j,.,ll'j11JIl J ,,LIJ LIO 1,.,sn(j s.1P..\\,,.\lT}, ssx),)r' )Its pur suopT )J)sTliu! 'sllllJs r.,.lr.\I„lis O] )lt: sdi1J )IJn};).1 ll}J St 1U�)WIL41!Ssl .lt��P.11 1N31NNDISSV DIJJVdi •tu�'tsi},Ja�ll�JUOl.I/J�,,1J� Ll.,dsV- �� uOnd�)�iLnsn �pil1s sigi T( ) )iu.)gD1, 1.10pi1(1llJsq) dpl -)qj 1Lms ud 91 pur l j .)d rd It() �l1 lJllx t.l }�lll'. \"l lTne`,t,l ',,Jls IL1J ()1 s,)Jn()T ,-)SOL}J jO.A1IUTTSOTd sit jp.A\ SL' s.,JI1( .1 1.10 sJ1L1111O.A JU)LI.M.AOLU a LlliluilJ Tnoq _jr ld )_AUnpT )ql LIO l,asn(l �)U MLIJS U0!111(ji111;!p dl.Tl )111 '.PINS JU mp llillp, sll.Iowd Jgum i,•LIUsy ,U(maxlsq Idwy u(, put; smm a 1jC11'lu:_1l' sIIOTJr.A JOj -)uT!J l.l_ll:.TJ }O LTOL't:lillll'.J'Sl.)}lOL[I l)LIVLLZ:)p 1.l_AUT1 1,:)7.p.)jndul(,.) SE L1J,lS s1,( LJJ:)LLI jl1l.AJs Llnil-Y)1LJ1 )(I ur,) 11-,lll.AV )3rU:!.0s,)ill: Sl dl1J V' Noiinol2JiSIG dl2li 7U�LlTllO1J_\,,j,.\\,,U Ili �q OJ 1,,,Jns'Old ti•IMIl.l.1 }O.Injunu put)J )Ljl :,JltT,;n111 �t'1 ., la! l lcjl'.l. ij„1Js slLll jO Slsc,dlnd )Ll,1()4 �1(Ite;tla`-)LI u,).\1 sQu -1t1 and Sail 111.1111 l,lll'• iJTlrnh sill.\j110 JL1,)u1LlO!?.\, 1, .\\:,U Na s\' •suopuis s11u 1-)L,r. s1»1TL'Lll 1-111,11I,1.1llUJ 'S;lll'•Tnl'Js•,T sl'• ,)sn purl ;)d.\J 11';.l.L)UI[III .).1(1 .1}TTCL I!Jd mu An .\(1-sed mJ1S Int-1J OJ Ss,)J,,l'J».Ti1,1,JJ4jt,Jr11.) Ur.LiO .1t1 LllSsl'.d,_ )Jn sdl.0 .1(j-Ssr(l 1TU1JP.lIT]5�1, dpi ill'.LUTJd r (11 lll,`,'l.U,jO JlltOd L' uT(,uj .\I,A\ )LIJ 11O sdOJti r �)1,t'LU ).it!JrljJ sdp. , ).in sd1TJ .\(1-Csr(l Illt)Ll >Il'.l(l l�(l .,ilJ llLTnl, 11.,J1'JJI,.,a� '.;'P,lltz., 9 lI1TaJt;., 9 sd,-11 j put, .imj N1,1 Lil.1,l ,,lll'..l�ll�n` .,LiOLi l JT.\\.1l',>1,,.\\•,i}l'.iJ.11" •)Up },.,1Z.11(,Td >l 11 `s�1I11,.,JOTI! :l.i.i i U;s i '�.11lJdl.l 1r.11.L,Ju1 •,[tlUs ,.\na 111.0•,TO�J.1.,tlJ put, s,.;1 IIUI; 1O .,L'.1J StL1J ,I'll.JUJLudo p-\al, rhl }lilt' 1,()(u\11O1J1,: di1J 1r111.,J111 iu •,JLi.I tl IU t:]l(!'u\�, ..,sn hurl 1,11T1`irll.iJunu(„ '1l'UU.,1,IS,T J1,,Ll..\\ sJL1�ll1LlO1�.L,1, )1,11-p1X! I Ul u,1nJO Li:IJJO mum sdlul ;)l sU011l'.J�dO.,li�l'..0 jla1JJ1\.y 110 JJrdl.tll 111' •,.\rl1 JOLI ()1,.61.11 '.iflr.tLt�Jut AID'V) SdIJJ .)l �Jlll� '•,]ls 1,l,l�OJd n OJ u0 sUt h:JU .,.\i'll JO11 Oh 1111.1 Sd!T] ,,s()LIJ .,11' 1�d!.lj :')},, ")I11Jdr.)lrli.MJ1.11 �ll,ttlU .111'.Ll.l';ll'.1(j )p ul sd1Tl 1,t11:"LIT.TJ .1(j-sSnd )111Jdn:) lrlLlJ1U1 JOi JlinOJ?i' ),] .,jll'.LLI .uj LT.,1JO;NIILLI `1t1)LLIJs11!}�r Uls .,L1J OJ 1nLJ.l.la\l s�l�lll.,.\ IMMST)L1, \(l 11)PLU s(h.,JJ.\1�U )O J•l(lL;711u J,)U .,':J �.Jlal]s., OJ T�}l.l(I It! K)\J.\\O}1 •Ju.-)U1dOp-\:)j) l: ,(l I,1110_A\.11'L1J ?Ll!.0)(I.1J(1LL,titl VO U .11ll Y) •l;rlL:ls,,Lll: .,PM),Id sLl)1I1J.,�t 1JCl Uu,Jn3.,lL,i7 Llla l lnr)Ll `l:.�d Jed .')IIJ ''Ln1nh l»Jta�u•, �a�11:.11V� CC ,"(' sd,u1 ,Lu:la(,L >r.JLI JhJ e,-hlpll, ,,,)1:;.,ll.,a '.`IIilJTS.I ( l[1.i�»:L, + t sdUJ 1)?1.11 SLlt.1J .Al'1,�J�-1A 1G ! 1 ! ]\\ I 1 1. `_ ss0.i `(,O lU p'l(1J l: OJ l)J1JJ(1)Jd sl l;l�iud(,:.,.,.,1, a.:1-1,��uu r}l1 liar• l�u,,.(�u(,J.O') .,L11 ']t1O1,1p1(i li'li 1\ U \�V-4M: �3 N0S� 3 ® NVS • SAND•RSON STEWART ' '� Table 3:Existing Conditions(2018)Capacity Calculations Existin (2018) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Approach Avg 95th% Avg 95th% Delay Queue Delay Queue s/veh LOS (ye h s/veh LOS veh Intersection Control Sign ed EB 27.7 C 7 26.8 C 6 Rouse Avenue & WB 25.0 C 1 26.2 C 1 NB 4.9 A 5 5.9 A 4 Oak Street SB 8.6 A 7 11.2 B 11 Intersection 13.5 B -- 12.6 B -- Intersection Control Si nali ed EB 23.8 C 3 23.8 C 4 Rouse Avenue & WB 23.3 C 2 23.6 C 3 NB 2.8 A 4 3.4 A 5 Tamarack Street SB 3.4 A 5 3.8 A 6 Intersection 7.3 A -- 7.7 A -- Intersection Control Two Way Stop Controlled(EV WB) EB 22.3 C 3 86.7 F 7 Rouse Avenue & WB 16.0 C 1 37.2 E 4 NB 0.8 A 1 1.7 A 1 Peach Street SB 1.3 A 1 0.8 A 1 Intersection 5.6 A -- 15.6 C -- Intersection Control Sign " WB 21.5 C 5 27.6 C 8 Rouse Avenue & NB 5.6 A 4 8.7 A 6 Mendenhall Street SB 5.7 A 3 9.1 A 8 Intersection 10.0 A -- 13.5 B -- Intersection Control Si nali�ed EB 16.0 B 6 22.9 C 8 Main Street& WB 17.0 B 7 18.0 B 7 NB 10.2 B 1 13.4 B 1 Broadway Avenue SB 11.5 B 3 16.6 B 5 Intersection 16.1 B -- 20.0 C -- Intersection Control Uncontrolled EB 7.2 A -- 7.1 A -- Ida Avenue & WB 7.2 A -- 7.1 A -- Front Street NB 0.0 A -- 6.4 A -- Intersection 7.2 A -- 7.1 A -- Intersection Control Uncontrolled EB 7.1 A -- 7.1 A -- Ida Avenue & WB 7.2 A -- 7.2 A - Aspen Street NB 0.0 A -- 8.1 A -- Intersection 7.2 A -- 7.2 A -- Intersection Control Uncontrolled EB 0.0 A - 0.0 A -- Front Street& NB 0.0 A -- 7.3 A -- Aspen Street SB 7.8 A -- 7.5 A -- Intersection 7.8 A -- 7.4 A -- Intersection Control Uncontrolled EB 7.6 A -- 6.5 A -- Ida Avenue & WB 7.2 A 7.8 A NB 7.4 A -- 7.2 A -- Cottonwood Street SB 7.2 A 7.2 A Intersection 7.4 A - 7.2 A -- Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS SANDERSON STEWART �!'' Table 4:Trip Generation Summary Inde endent VariableT Average WeekdayAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Intensi Units total enter I exit total enter exit total enter exit 8 uildink#1 Multifamily Housing Pklid-Rise l 46 1 Dwelling Units 250 125 125 17 4 13 20 12 8 Internal Capture Tri s** 8 2 6 0 0 0 3 1 2 General Office Building 2 0.2 T1000 ft'GFA 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal Capture Trips** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net NewE.rternal Personal Vehicle Trips 244 124 120 17 4 13 17 11 6 Buildin #2 Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise 1 18 1 Dwelling Units 98 49 49 G 2 4 8 15 3 Internal Capture Tri s** 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 Net New External Personal Vehicle Trips 95 48 47 6 2 4 6 1 4 2 Building#3 Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise 1 12 Dwelling Units 65 33 32 4 1 3 5 3 2 Internal Ca ture Tri s** 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net New External Personal Vehicle Trips 63 33 30 4 1 3 5 3 2 Buildin #4 iblultifami1v Housing \-Gd-Rise 1 16 IDwellingUaits 87 44 43 G 2 4 7 4 3 Internal Capture Tri s** 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 Small Office Building3 5.2 1000 ft'GI=r\ 84 42 42 10 8 2 13 4 9 Internal Capture Tri s** 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net New External Personal Vehicle Trips 1 162 81 81 16 10 6 19 8 11 Building#5 Quality Restaurant 4 2.2 1000 ft2 GFA 184 92 92 2 2 0 17 11 6 Internal Capture Trips** 21 11 10 0 0 0 3 2 1 Net New External Personal Vehicle Trips 163 81 82 2 2 0 14 9 5 Buildine#6 General Office Building 2 28.7 1000 ft2 GFA 280 140 140 33 28 5 33 5 28 Internal Capture Tri s** 9 7 2 0 0 0 3 2 1 Net New External Personal Vehicle Trips 271 133 138 33 28 5 30 3 27 Total Gross Trips 1050 526 524 78 47 31 103 44 59 Total Internal Capture Trips 52 26 26 0 0 0 12 6 6 Total New External Personal Vehicle 998 500 498 78 47 31 91 38 1 53 (1) Multifamily Housing(Mid-Rise)-Land Use 221* Units=Dwelling Units Average Weekday: Average Rate=5.44 (50%entering/50%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 7 and 9 AM: Average Rate=0.36 (26%entering/74%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 4 and G Pkl: Average Rate=0.44 (61%entering/39%exiting) (2) General Office Building-Land Use 710* Units=1000 ft2 Gross Floor Area(GFA) Average Weekday: Average Rate=9.74 (50%entering/50%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 7 and 9 AM: Average Rate=1.16 (86%entering/14%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 4 and 6 PM: Average Rate=1.15 (16%entering/84%exiting) (3) Small Office Building-hand Use 712* Units=1000 ft2 Gross Floor Area(GFA) Average Weekday: Average Rate=16.19 (50%entering/50%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 7 and 9 AM: Average Rate=1.92 (83%cntering/17%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 4 and 6 PM: Average Rate=2.45 (32%entering/68%exiting) (4) Quality Restaurant-Land Use 931* Units=1000 ft2 Gross Floor Area(GFA) Average Weekday: Average Rate=83.84 (50%entering/50%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 7 and 9 AM: Average Rate=0.73 (80%entering/20%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 4 and 6 PM: Average Rate=7.80 (67%entering/33%exiting) *Trip Generation, 10th Edition,Institute of Transportation Engineers,2017 **Trip Generation Handbook,3rd Edition,Institute of Transportation Engineers,2017 Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS m • SA ARSO TE ART N N S W N •, r ._ _ h KEY - - ;�' p r r XX — A.M.PEAK HOUR �� r (XX) — P.M.PEAK HOUR IM .y XX% — DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE • r� �° ti'•R, 1 (0) (4) (0) l — O 0 5 0 L1 5%: .�.. \ (0)0 0(01 (0)0 0(0) t (6)7 — 0(0) C 4 5 3 0 01, (8) (5) (0) 04 (0) (0) (10) 0 0 12 r . � .5/p, 2 30/�.. of •r• t M� (0)0 s f 0(0) �,-'����' �*•. � ��, /� rr. w �b�•j . k r . +, r J .�- r 3 (0) (0) (0) rr`Y �. . • *C t•e r1��,i i 4*7 XF r \ -—�� (p)5 —► �— 5(5) Ln 70 •:�i i►4 t �r rt� t7 Ark 4 (2) (6) 0 S 001 —� --5'0 D. 5 - 7(5) 44 ' • ` ° o ° Figure 4A: Trip Distribution and Assignment Cotronwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS SANDERSON STEWART as°� KEY XX — A.M. PEAK HOUR (XX) — P.M. PEAK HOUR XX% — DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE ter }•tl� �_ ,�. X\a ca3 } X-1 •�+'� met ; �' E - J, t 1 7 (0) (0) (0) Eli r�185% ® �.. 15% - �: b• _ , OOo 7 r loco o(o) am' ate.• (4)2 —► �— 4(3) - a -room,, (4)2 G WIN,; � . (2) (0) (0) )� •f , 8 (0) (4) (0) vim' t 0 I2 0 (o)0 1. 0(0) r 0 3 0 /46s[ t•auAIAUt j► ° ° 0 0 D - 0cm 8 C Figure 4B: Trip Distribution and Assignment Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS FRI SAN STEW ART ARSONSTE Q) TRAFFIC IMPACTS Traffic Volumes for the purlioscs of this snub-,based on Information from the Client.it was ,issruncd rhat full huildout a.nd occupanc: for the G)ttonwood and Ida mixed-use development\vwould occur by the end of calendar rear 2020. In add:tion to the site-puncrated traffic from the subject development, background traffic voltaanes are also expected ro increase for sady area erects and intersections due to"cneral _,,ro,\vth.To account for that growrli, Sander<on Stewart_evicm-ed recent historical traffic nolumc Mara for the:u ea and determined that an annual hack,,,round rowth rare of?.i percent would he ca)_nsen arivc_`-appropriate for mudeling ambient gro,,N-rh. ligure 5.1 and l'i'aire 5B 'pages IS and 1'), illusrratc the projected and I'M peak h,nir lull Buildout `2 2 I, scenario traffic vt kook projecriums that were calculated for this Study. Intersection Capacity Sanderson Stewart performed intersection capacitN* calculations for the Full Buildout'20-20, scenario Mr -he AM and I'M peak hour traffic vohime projections presented in ITILI cs DA and 5B. The calculations vs ere initially performed based on crostin-kr lane co,nfl,,urarions and traffic control features for off-utc lntersecriom, except for:1 nhilned waffle Sltina: NID l prl)'ect rO be constructed in 2020? ar the Ruusc Avcnuc'Pcach Street interzccriun. Near the •ite,several changes to rho. curr_rt stre:t "vstem are proposed by Sandera,n Stew art based the City's recomnnendarions to rennov'e the sc;"nncnt of I-ro nt�t:ect bctwccn Ida Avenue and aspen Street. Removal of the roadvc:n- su—nnerir is shown in Figure ;B. f'apacity calculati�,ns�t ere performed ba,�cd on this updated configuration.«-hieh includes a rwo-way !cast and west approach) ;top-conrrol at the innrsccrions of .Aspen Street with Isla Avenuc. 'I lie existing intersection on Front Street become free-flowing setimenrs.The sire access intersection was initially assumed to he stop-controlled With no auxiliary turn lanes. Table a Cpa«c ?llj shows, the results of the I'ull Buildout(_'ll?Il) scenario capacity calculations.Thu resat,, shoe that tL-c planned traffic signal at the Rousc Avcnuc,,;Pe:tch Street intersection xvill improve()perarions even with t.ne ad-li-ion of site rraffic and hackLround gro-wth. Thar intersection is predicted to operate at no than I.OS(: fo_ _he casrho=and and -westbound ]c,,,s during .1\I and PM peak hour, AH other intrrsccrions\yill continue ro operate ,it or ahoy e LOB.(- for both 1\I and PM peak hour•. Detailed capacity calculation\yorkshcuts for the Fa 11 BUildour'O2O traffic--)ro ection scenario are included in.Appendix i:. Because the rrtffic signal at the Rouse.Avcnuc with Pcttch tirreet intersccriou is:tlr'All,planned by MI71'_and al_ other study area intersections arc projected to continue ro operate at acceptable levels,no traffic signal��arranrs xyerc ev alua-cd for this deN•clopment. Turn-Lune warntnrs were cyaltutted for the project intersections and are descrihcd in a later section of this report. [ij D �.: . ) )) Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS m SANDERSON STEWART 0o°� de40 KEY' XX A.M. PEAK HOUR �� / ,\� � �''•,� ,�! (XX) — P.M. PEAK HOUR IE Irv \. + w ,l 1 (216)(383) (0) ' 4 110 266 0 Y .f 4 8)173 1,, l ♦ r„� '••i+J •, (165)207 0 0) ;9+' ^� „C'fir r Gl r +, ,tii•► t �f : 121 292 0 y.� .*. c..• t3 ��A _� ' (253)(275) (0) t sr. �1;:•s+i. •�)T +1C1 �r' iy[�' � • , 2 (32)(474)( ) o.31 35 379 48 (47)r41 1 56(57) _ • �. }- _ f C a. (44)58 '26(64)' .�- �o4ti` --fir.♦ �•�� '�:: � t ' ' �,Rl 1 (�/ _ 11 13 7 _ +`rF.L ''N� t•---. � � (zs) (412a12)(1a) - • f'� .� .1� '4��`v:. �'•:>_L�r.�J��-{ 1 �' ISM �A�O a- C' ► +J t ''j F'r V (55)(423)(50) �,+ 1 53 288 65 r. t J. 'rr ,+ `''n •� (28)16 44(107) 7 G + (48)55 29(21) (71)83 603) tj Aw 33 263 25 (82) (338)(t7) :f : (167)(284)(40) + c • • r Z�" 'i ' �p` 119 152 41 1— 175(228 gab 44 280 17 $�r s 71� +' # t J r � A�Ir :`.� �' (83) (339) (9) 77 ` Yw.r �" l•, 4 ' • - L—• �,}ice+ 1��� 5 (50) (0) 055) _ Q . [�j�l T s• 23 0 109 •� 5 (99)49 106(126 + r• ' ~ !� '�`' (688)504 —i .4 — 617(658 � rv. �: • �'�1�tr,r. rra 1 0 0 a f r �2-f� p�'_w (0) (0} Figure SA:Full Buildout(2020)Traffic Volumes M Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS N1 A DIR S N SON STEWART aea, 7KEY :. NM.PEAK HOUR = ' �. (XX) — P.M.PEAK HOUR t r 17 7 (0) (25) (4) iark 0 11 2 - -- •�_T7_• 3 7 0 E -- 2 / 81 2 11 0 .l..a.ata...a - � 1 � 7d (0)2 0(0) • !• r (0)0 0(2) "A 2 11 0 •� " �. 9 Fil (33)40 �Rl �- 7(5) C' .I I � Efi-rb 27 4 •r � , �. (45) (8) C* i C� i n Figure 5B:Full Buildout(2020) Traffic Volumes Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS F% SANDERSON STEWART Q#§5,21f Table 5:Future Buildout(2020)Capacity Calculations Future 2020 + Site AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Approach Avg 95th% Avg 95th% Delay Queue Delay Queue s/veh LOS veh s/veh LOS veh Intersection Control Si nali ed EB 27.6 C 7 26.8 C 7 Rouse Avenue & WB 24.7 C 1 26.3 C 1 NB 5.4 A 5 6.6 A 5 Oak Street SB 9.2 A 7 12.4 B 12 Intersection 13.9 113.4 B -- Intersection Control Si nali ed EB 23.8 C 4 23.7 C 4 Rouse Avenue & WB 23.6 C 2 24.0 C 3 NB 3.0 A 4 3.7 A 6 Tamarack Street SB 3.8 A 6 4.2 A 7 Intersection 7.7 A -- 8.2 A -- Intersection Control Si nali ed EB 28.6 C 3 21.0 C 2 Rouse Avenue& WB 26.4 C 2 21.4 C 2 NB 6.8 A 5 8.1 A 6 Peach Street SB 6.4 A 6 10.9 B 9 Intersection 11.8 B -- 12.3 B -- Intersection Control Si na# ed WB 21.4 C 5 27.6 C 8 Rouse Avenue & NB 6.0 A 5 9.5 A 7 Mendenhall Street SB 6.0 A 4 10.1 B 9 Intersection 10.2 B -- 14.2 B -- Intersection Control Si nali ed EB 16.3 B 6 24.9 C 14 Main Street& WB 17.4 B 7 17.8 B 9 NB 10.2 B 1 14.6 B 1 Broadway Avenue SB 11.7 B 3 18.5 B 6 Intersection 16.4 B -- 1 21.0 C -- Intersection Control Two-Way Stop Controlled B & WIB EB 8.8 A 0 8.9 A 0 Ida Avenue& WB 9.3 A 0 8.9 A 0 NB 2.2 A 0 0.7 A 0 Aspen Street SB 1.1 A 0 1.0 A 0 Intersection 3.5 A -- 2.9 A -- Intersection Control Uncontrolled EB 7.6 A -- 6.5 A -- Ida Avenue & WB 7.2 A -- 7.8 A -- -- -- Cottonwood Street NB 7.4 A 7.2 ASB 7.3 A -- 7.3 A -- Intersection 7.4 A -- 7.2 A -- Intersection Control 0 -Way Stop Controlled B EB 0.0 A 0 0.0 A 0 Site Access& WB 7.3 A 0 7.3 A 0 Aspen Street NB 8.8 A 1 8.8 A 1 Intersection 4.2 5.5 -- Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS m SAND RSON STEWART Mitigation Alternatives Auxiliary Turn Lanes Sanderson Stcwirt performed an auxiliary turn lane warrant anal\its for the study area:ntersectons t, determine if the such improvements would he warranted based on the applicable MDT and .USI 1T() criter a.^'he analysis results sho "ved that southbound auxiliary-left-turn and right-turn lanes should be considered for t17e R:)usc Avenuc/Peach Street intersection with existing traffic volumes while a two-vray stop-controlled inter�section. .lddirionalh-,aux:liary left-Turn and right-turn lanes should also be considered for the Rouse AN-cnue/peach Street intersection with em—mr-A traffic volumes. A copy of the auxiliary lane warrant worksheets for all the applicable project inrcr,�ections are attached in Appendix D. Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities Sanderson Stem-arr completcc an off-site improvements concept schematic (Appendix E) for the area adjacent to the site. The schematic Shows a sidewalk surrounding the site on the north, east, and south pro -)ert,�lines-with intersection ramps and ADA facilities. ()n the north side of Aspen Street,an 8-foot wail is shown to connect adjacent facilities. lnrur<ccrion bulb-ours are sho,wrl to shorten the pedestrian crossing;distances. Roadway Facilities Also Shown in the off-site improvement concept schematic, are roadway desitnn ,< for.aspen Street,Ida Street, and Cottonwood Street. The Aspen Street and Cottonwood Street sections march the Ciro• standarus and include on-street parallel parking;on both sides of Aspen Street and on-street diagonal parking;on both sides of Co:tonwo(:d Street. Ida Avenue has restricted right-of-,vay and therefore the schematic shows a smaller roadway section With on-street parallel parking on the west side only. With the restricted road,,vay secrion,a woonerf design is being considered ,N-here uie roadway becomes a shared space for cars, bicyclists,and pedestrians ,Nith a slower speed limir and traffic calming measures. Site Area Intersections The three inrersecdons and triangle park created by aspen Street,Ida:1vroue,any Fro -it Strerr were noted as a concern by the City of Bozeman as they exist roday. Reviem'Ing traffic turning;moVements through data collection efforts,it was obsen-ed vehicles turning; from 1•ronr Street onto Ida Avenue and aspen Street mancuv_r turns at hi'ghcr than desired speeds due to the intersection gkc-ws. 1 he traffic volumes ar the intersections are low and could he consr.idated into a single intersection. Three options (Option .1,()ptiun B,()ption C,and Option D) have been submitted to the C,fy for reN•ie,,x-. With the extension of aspen Street from Wallace .1 cnue to Ida .\vcnue.it is anticipated the traffic Laving the&N-clopment heading east on .lsprn gill use Ida.��enue and Front Street for destinations ru the�ourh and cast of the site. :'raftic leaving the development with destinations to the north and.rest of the site are anticipated to head Nvc,<t on .aspen Street to then access Wallace �vcnue. Therefore, the segment of Ida Avenue ber-ween .Aspen Srrect 1•ront Street is nor anticipated to be primary route for traffic from the development. Cottonwood and Ida mixed-use development TIS ® SIl Juawdolanap asn-pax.7w opl puo pooMuonoD '(CID1,n]�1) ti3J1A3Q iOT]UOD Ji14LTJ LUlo3Tui*'I.uo 113"LlU 3LI] pLIL' SpTL'pums umL Zog to A]lD yyA% 3JUL'pTOJJL' LIl p3LlSis3p 3d 11L'Lis -,iuPLl13Ao1duii p31L'l3T-LioT]p]1odsue.] iiV - 3]1S 3Li] q)llwy .\llAU:)PULIUJ ui ij]S3p3d]uL'lidwo:)-V QN.7 Lllp]L11L'LLi o1 311s .1]13doTd 3Ll] ]o 3SL']LIoT}SLIoIL'.\]lAi]J3L uw 111,T] p11L`Ii13A\3p1S - LioudO Llr�ls3p L13soq:) u0 p3sL'ci UoT]J3sT3]Lll 3111.13AV LpIp33T1� u,)dsV o 1a311q u3dsV uo (dal Lpnos) ss3JJL 31T� o :suopL'JOI 5ui.mollol -4y 1L' 113iiL]sUl a)q pinoLls (i-CN sWiis awi,,u izxms pUL (I-III) suoiS do]q - 'sau>l3pin5 uxw,,,3p upul3zog to.iii:)SuLmollo4 3nu3AV 3Jelllfll 01 3na3AV UPI WOTJ mclsV 3J3uuoD - •.iI,mpdOJdch, SLl.�ls loT]uOJ :)jjyT] 3]L'pdn PUU UOTIJ3ST3]Lll ]33T1�11.103d/311U I.\V L'pl/]a3T]� U;)dSV 3LI1 4o 31;)uo uopuLgV - :Togmi3 3Lp ]o]L w2 'pn( iLuoiss34old alp pup.ipnls siy LuOJl gns'3T sls.iiL'uL 3LI] Uo p3SL'cl si sL1owpu;)LLTLuoJ3T to iq c ul:\\oli(l 3L1� su0i11?puaww0:)a�j s3ul;I ssaTa�ss3Tuui aluls yum palapow uigiA\nuln3nb iVl_UTLITLU LI1L\\3JLLl3s to i3:\3i 3ICIL]d3JJL'Liu ii'• ..m,T3do o] p3]i3di:)p L Si uoAJ3ST3]Lll ss3JJL' ,ms 3LI,L "I tlpu3ddV Ul p3plAold s1S.\iL'UL'siurjaL'd 3LIoIL'-pums`iLwj(.)j 3Li1 ui p3pL\old sL' ,uoiMInJiLJ[SUPITL'd p3TL'Lis alp sp3aJ\3 q:)iq.m`s3JL'ds&TyTI'•d 133T]s 3JL'l.11s zc pul"`101 33L'1Tns p3SL'3l L: ui S3JL'ds L/ 'S3JL'ds 96 yiA\D&,Iu'S punUlii13p1111 ']l 'Ls GGL`G� L' S3SOclOJ(l ULid 3]1S 3Ll] ']J3Iold IG]�_L' LiSIIOTLI] LK)UJnT1SLioJ Tol p3UUL'ld pUL p3]Lll',TTI?.\\ Sl iL'LIn1S L T3_\3;\\Ol_l 'LIODJ.lsTaltli ]33T1� LiJl:3Cl/311113.\�J 3ti11U21 Jll] ]L p31LIL'TTL':\\3Tti s3lli:1 Li ru-i Sit pLIL'1131 punoclynos put,, punoclll]lou 1Ly puno] ]TL':\\3]S uosT3puv� '.vi,)LLI03n pa.\\,ys 3LI1 _\cl pismn S3Llsi aJ TOl 1J3T1OJ pli oy, L1pl1J3ti.13]Lll 13,111�lIJU-) pLlp 311L13AN? - S,.nw 13Li1 jU LI(iul'.ZTIL'll lS pLlli 1L XUUnl]L'3T 3LIy'i3LiuoST3d ]QI� LI11:\1 Sllol]l:dl3.\L1oJ uo p3SLcl 1LI3 uU0JTAU3 ut,. n 1L13T1113 3Li] 101 p31J3dS3 sr 3cl o1 ptmol 3.13:1\ suol]J3sT3]LIl L'31L'.1pi11S�')unsls3 3y lo] s3]L'1:All-L)A3S pLIL' L)SL'TJ 3Li T •Sd1T] 3]1S pup Lp.\\o.Td punoT _yJLcl to uonippL 3Lp qIM U3:\3 p3A0ldWl 3cl ILIA\�0- os `ii,.Wiis Jll]L'T] L Li]L\\pa]JaTTo,3cl of p3Lml'.id sl ]i1ci sL100TpUOJ VUlIsl\3 3Lp Lil ]L13S31d sl .1--nu)Jl]3p -,iqj_']3:)l1q LIJL';)d �o Ilk)T]J3sT31ui )y m ,-, igm'ojddv. 3idljnw lo] p3111]Li3lll 3T3.\\ suoilluoJ SLilll,)nh pLIL' qo -1 pLIL' s133T]s l'.311?TO] PuEu 3p Jl]ll'.T1 :\\3U to -)Will()-\ imiluilu L'• 3]t'.T3113)ill.\\I:)A01d]U3LUdol3.\3p 3si1-pazl-LLl LpI pul;pOO.\\ll(;]1o1 3Lp]Lip u.\wLls SL'LI sis.ilLL i,,2uyp3J31d 3Lij suoisnl:)uoD SN0liVGN3NA0DTd 'R SNOMIDNOD r• AVM31S NOS� 3ON`dS • •TRAFFIC COUNT DATA v �QQGICaQ4 SAND ERSO N STEWARTICOM i SANDERSON %�:� STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Broadway Ave&Main Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: AM Peak Flour 7:45-8:45 Ate Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Broadway Avenue East/West Street: Main Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Broadway Avenue Broadway Avenue Blain Street Main Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0(1 1 1.00 7:45 AM 4 0 31 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 121 9 0 130 29 154 0 0 183 348 8:00 AM 3 0 15 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 13 0 125 21 142 0 0 163 306 8:15 AM 5 0 28 0 33 0 0 1 0 1 1 132 10 0 143 22 151 0 0 173 350 8:30 AIVI 10 0 26 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 15 0 125 22 134 0 0 15G 317 Grand Total 22 0 100 0 122 0 0 1 0 1 1 475 47 0 523 94 581 0 0 675 1321 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Truck% 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total%1 1.7 0.0 7.6 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 36.0 3.6 0.0 39.6 1 7.1 44.0 0.0 0.0 51.1 100.0 PHF 0.94 Broadway Avenue In Out 122 141 RT TH I LT I U 22 J 0 1 100 1 0 41 y S c, 0 J„ v Total Entering o e 1321 a• c Cn F � � n 0 t~ r c ^ a v O H nl J G x 1 0 1 0 0 U LT TH RT 1 1 Out In Ak Broadway Avenue 1300 North Tianstech Way Billiner tone 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fox 406.656.1* wvnv.sandersonstewart.com SANDERSON t�.►. STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Broadway Ave&Main Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/DDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour(4:30-5:30 PD Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Broadway Avenue East/West Street: Main Street ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Broadway Avenue Broadway Avenue Main Street Main Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Fight Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1 0.98 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4:30 PM 10 0 30 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 21 0 182 28 132 0 0 160 382 4:45 PM 9 0 29 0 38 0 0 1 0 1 1 161 26 0 188 25 146 0 0 171 398 5:00 PM 11 0 53 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 1 165 24 1 191 31 176 0 0 207 462 5:15 PM 18 0 28 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 22 0 182 31 167 0 0 198 426 Grand Total 48 0 140 0 1 188 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 647 93 1 743 115 621 0 0 1 736 J1661 Medium Truck% 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 Heap Truck% 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.1 0.0 0.7 2.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total Truck% 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.1 0.0 0.9 3.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Total%1 2.9 0.0 8.4 0.0 11.3 0.0 1 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 0.1 0.1 38.8 5.6 0.1 44.5 6.9 37.2 0.0 0.0 1 44.1 100.0 PHF 0.90 Broadway Avenue In Out 188 208 RT TH LT IU e48 0 140 0 N x C, 12 J O r w o Total Entering v 1668 r a r M a J O rr W 0 1 0 0 U LT TH RT 2 1 Out In Broadway Avenue 1300 North TtoWech Way Erggs,Monona 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fox 406.656.0967 j www.sandersoWewart.com At, SANDERSON Ra AVW STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Cottonwood Street&Ida Avenue Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/INOT Count Time Period: AM Peak Hour :45-8:45 At\,I) Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottomvood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Ida Avenue East/West Street: Cottonwood Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ida Avenue Ida Avenue Cottonwood Street Cottonwood Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7:45 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8:00 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 8:15AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 AIVI 1 3 E 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 2 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 1 13 Grand Total 2 9 0 0 11 0 10 2 0 12 3 0 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 1 29 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 50.0 11.1 j 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 10.0 5 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 50.0 11.1 i 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 10.0 50.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 6.9 31.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 37.9 0.0 1 34.5 1 6.9 1 0.0 1 41.4 10.3 0.0 3.4 3.4 17.2 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 3.4 100.0 PHF 0.56 Ida Avenue In Out 11 11 RT I =9d 2 L o � � o a Total Entering o C o � o 0 29 0 0 3 0 c °- o V n o O � o x M 1 I 0 1 2 1 10 1 0 U I LT I TH I RT 13 12 Out In Ida Avenue 1300 North Tramutech Way Bar"ontano 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5256 1 Fccc 406.656.f• www.sandersorstewart.com r SANDERSON 4!.v STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Cottonwood Street&Ida Avenue Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/DDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour(4:30-5:30 PI\ Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Ida Avenue East/West Street•. Cottonwood Street eWcle Volumes and Adjustments Ida Avenue Ida Avenue Cottonwood Street Cottonwood Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4:30 PM 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 10 4:45 PM 0 6 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 5:00 PM 0 12 0 0 12 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 5:15 PD1 1 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 Grand Total 2 26 0 0 28 0 15 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 3 IJ Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 50.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 Total Truck% 50.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 Total%1 4.2 1 54.2 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 58.3 1 0.0 31.3 0.0 0.0 31.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 4.2 2.1 0.0 6.3 100.0 PHF 0.67 Ida Avenue In Out 28 15 RT TH I LT U 2 26 0 0 t Total Entering v� o 0 48 a 0 0 C: 0a. o cr F U '� o rfl F o O 7 Fir N 0 1 0 1 15 1 0 U I LT I TH I RT 29 15 Out In Ida Avenue 1300 North Tmnstech Way I Billings,Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 I Fox 406.656.0967 www.sondewrts eNod.com SANDERSON A1730� STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Front Street R Aspen Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: AM Peak Hour(7:45-8:45 AD-I) Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Front Street East/West Street: Aspen Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Front Street Front Street Aspen Street N/A Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thor Left U-turn Total Ri ht Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 AD4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 0.0 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PHF 0.25 Front Street In Out 2 0 RT TH I I U 0 2 0 O o Total Entering a 2 V c n. d � o 4 O ° a 0 l � T 000 U LT TH 2 0 Out In AL Front Street 1300 North Tmmtech Way Billinlertona 59102 I Phone 406.656.5255 I Fox 406.656. wyew.sandersonstewart.com SANDERSON 49A ST EWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Front Street&Aspen Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 Pl\ Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street. Front Street East/West Street: Aspen Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Front Street Front Street Aspen Street N/A Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Ri ht Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:15PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Grand Total 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 4 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 0.0 1 33.3 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 1 44.4 1 22.2 1 0.0 66.7 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 100.0 PHF 0.75 Front Street In Out 3 4 RT TH I IU 0 3 0 � N 0 Total Entering U U 9 C n. � o o a H 0 2 4 U LT TH 3 6 Out In 17 Front Street 1 3100 North Tionstech Way I Vings,Montono 59102 Phone 406.656.5255 I Fox 406.656.0967 www.sondewnstewad.com SANDERSON A17%7 STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Front Street&Ida Avenue Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: A1\4 Peak Hour(7:45-8:45 Al l) Project Number 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mired Use?roject North/South Street: Ida Avenue East/West Street: Front Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments N/A Ida Avenue Front Street Front Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Fight Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 AIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 8:15AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 10 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 19 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 14.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 14.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 36.8 1 0.0 1 36.8 1 52.6 1 10.5 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 63.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PHF 0.79 ~ � T O 0 Total Entering C ^ 19 w :D o O 07 0 U LT RT 10 7 Out In AL Ida Avenue 1300 North Tronsiech Way Billinlerio o 59102 1 Phone 406.656.52551 Fat 406.656.10 www.sandersomtewart.com SANDERSON STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Front Street&Ida Avenue Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 PTD Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Ida Avenue East/West Street: Front Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments N/A Ida Avenue Front Street Front Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 0 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 2 11 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 6 1 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 16 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 11 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 15 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 7 Grand Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 24 3 0 1 1 28 0 4 0 0 4 49 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.7 0.0 34.7 49.6 6.1 0.0 1 2.0 1 57.1 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 8.2 100.0 PHF 0.77 0 N A Z O � Total Entering c 49 0 G N o � w a C N W O M N 0 17 0 U LT RT 24 17 Out In Ida Avenue 1300 North Trotulech Way &.1ings,Montana 59102 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 www.sondersonsfewad.com SANDERSON � STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Ida Avenue&Aspen Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/bIDT Count Time Period: AM Peak Hour 7:45-8:45 AD' Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Ida Avenue East/West Street: Aspen Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ida Avenue Ida Avenue N/A Aspen Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.)0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 H 7:45 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8:15AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Grand Total 0 10 0 0 10 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 0.0 58.8 0.0 0.0 58.8 0.0 41.2 0.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 100.0 PHF ljot-0 Ida Avenue In Out 10 7 TH LT U 10 0 0 o o � o � Total Entering 17 ° 0 o O 71r 0 7 1 0 U TH RT 10 7 Out In Ida Avenue 1300 North Tronstech Way Billimemtano 59102 Phone 406.656.5255 Fox 406.656.1* www.sondersonstewort.com SANDERSON 410 STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Ida Avenue&Aspen Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 P Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Ida Avenue East/west Street: Aspen Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ida Avenue Ida Avenue N/A Aspen Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Fight Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thor Left U-turn Total Fight Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4:45 PM 0 6 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 15 5:00 PM 0 11 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 5:15PM 0 5 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 Grand Total 0 24 0 0 1 24 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 43 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 Total Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 Total%1 0.0 1 55.8 0.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 39.5 0.0 0.0 39.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.7 100.0 PHF 0,72 Ida Avenue In Out 24 17 TH LT U 24 0 0 o %d ti N � IV Total Entering o 43 5 q o O c Fir 0 1 1 17 1 0 U I TH I RT 26 17 Out In Ida Avenue IMO North Tmwech Woy I &"ings,Moremn 59102 Phone 406.656.52551 Fox 406.656.0967 1 www.sondersonsiewod.com AN SANDERSON A�:`� STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue&Mendenhall Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/' IDT Count Time Period: Aid(Peak Hour(7:45-8:45 ADI) Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida D4ixed Use Project North/South Street: Rouse Avenue East/West Street: Mendenhall Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Rouse Avenue Rouse Avenue Mendenhall Street Mendenhall Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7:45 AM 48 33 12 0 93 2 58 13 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 10 34 0 0 44 210 8:00 AM 21 38 7 0 66 6 62 12 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 10 47 3 0 60 206 8:15 AM 23 32 12 0 67 3 80 7 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 18 50 2 0 70 227 8:30 AM 20 38 8 0 66 5 60 10 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 18 35 4 0 57 198 Grand Total 112 141 39 0 292 16 260 42 0 318 0 0 0 0 0 56 166 9 0 231 841 Medium Truck% 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.4 4.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 3.0 Heavy Truck% 0.9 2.8 2.6 0.0 2.1 6.3 1.5 2.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Truck% 3.6 2.8 2.6 0.0 3.1 6.3 1.9 7.1 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.9 Total%1 13.3 1 16.8 4.6 1 0.0 34.7 1 1.9 30.9 5.0 0.0 37.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 19.7 1.1 0.0 27.5 100.0 PHF 0.93 Rouse Avenue In Out 292 316 RT TH LT I U 112 141 39 0 O ~ CCT Ti N O M C1 7 Total Entering C a a 841 8 r s c � -°10 cn c � v c o O � o E� xCD l Fr 0 1 42 1 260 1 16 U I LT I TH I RT 150 318 Out In Ak Rouse Avenue 1300 North Tronstech Way Bitlin'Ontona 59102 I Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.6561* www.sandersonstewart.com SANDERSON STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue&Mendenhall Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 PM) Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Rouse Avenue East/West Street. Mendenhall Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Rouse Avenue Rouse Avenue Mendenhall Street Mendenhall Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Fight Thru Left U-rum Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4:30 PM 49 70 9 0 128 0 78 18 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 14 42 2 0 58 282 4:45 PM 30 68 6 0 104 3 80 22 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 14 46 1 0 61 270 5:00 PM 48 82 10 0 140 5 80 23 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 18 63 3 0 84 332 5:15 PM 30 45 13 0 88 1 79 16 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 13 63 1 0 77 261 Grand Total 157 1 265 38 0 460 9 317 79 0 405 0 0 0 0 0 59 214 7 0 1 280 1145 Medium Truck% 1.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 Heavy Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 14.3 0.0 0.7 Total Truck% 1.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.6 2.5 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 14.3 0.0 1.4 Total% 13.7 23.1 3.3 0.0 40.2 0.8 27.7 6.9 0.0 35.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 5.2 1 18.7 0.6 0.0 1 24.5 100.0 PHF 0.86 Rouse Avenue In Out 460 376 RT TH LT I U 157 265 38 0 � x O A Z 00 [J v b Total Entering j 1145 L y C _ 41 (~ O o J O F I f 0 79 317 9 U LT TH RT 272 405 Out In Rouse Avenue 1300 North Tmnslech Way V.:ngs,Montano 59102 ( Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 I www.sondersonstewatt.com 05111 JF SANDERSON 7 STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue&Oak Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: AM Peak Hour(7:45-8:45 AM) Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Rouse Avenue East/West Street: Oak Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ROGse Avenue Rouse Avenue Oak Street Oak Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Fight Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 1 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7:45 AM 27 55 0 0 82 0 51 23 0 74 70 0 50 0 120 0 1 0 0 1 277 8:00 AM 26 56 0 0 82 0 59 27 0 86 43 0 37 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 248 8:15 AM 26 84 0 0 110 0 74 29 0 103 45 0 37 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 295 8:30 tA�4 26 53 0 0 79 0 91 31 0 122 32 0 41 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 274 Grand Total 105 1 248 0 0 353 0 275 110 0 385 190 0 165 0 355 0 1 0 0 1 1094 Medium Truck% 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.4 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 1.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 2.2 7.3 0.0 3.6 3.2 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 1.9 4.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 2.5 9.1 0.0 4.4 3.7 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 9.6 22.7 0.0 0.0 1 32.3 0.0 25.1 10.1 0.0 1 35.2 1 17.4 0.0 15.1 1 0.0 32.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 100.0 PHF 0.93 Rouse Avenue In Out 353 440 RT I TH I LT fU 105 248 0 0 L o O N � o r Total Entering v O a 1094 O rt D o c O n E-' O O z i 0 1 110 275 0 U I LT TH RT 438 385 Out In Rouse Avenue 1300 North Tmr6tech Way ( Billin"O rtana 59102 I Phone 406.656.5255 I Fac 406.656.fo wvnv.sondersoWexort.corn SANDERSON STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue&Oak Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour(4:30-5:30 PD Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Rouse Avenue East/west Street. Oak Street Vehicle.Volumes and Adjustments Rouse Avenue Rouse Avenue Oak Street Oak Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-tum Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4:30 PM 50 94 0 0 144 0 64 47 0 111 37 0 27 0 64 0 1000300E 1 0 2 321 4:45 PM 48 71 0 0 119 0 69 62 0 131 36 1 35 0 72 0 0 0 322 5:00 PM Gl 118 0 0 179 0 57 65 0 122 33 2 32 0 67 0 0 0 368 5:15 PM 47 78 0 0 125 0 G7 59 0 126 45 0 37 0 82 0 0 0 333 Grand Total 206 361 0 0 567 0 257 233 0 490 151 3 131 0 285 0 1 1 0 2 1344 Medium Truck% 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck% 1.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.3 0.4 0.0 1.4 1.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total%1 15.3 1 26.9 0.0 0.0 42.2 1 0.0 1 19.1 17.3 0.0 36.5 11.2 0.2 9.7 0.0 21.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 100.0 PHF 0.91 Rouse Avenue In Out 567 388 RT TH LT U 206 361 0 0 0 It O Total Entering O y 1344 rZ O rt a o � a p N W �., L. M l 1 F*ir 0 1 233 1 257 1 0 U I LT I TH I RT 513 490 Out In Rouse Avenue 1300 North Tronsiech Way ( Wings,Monlono 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 www.sondersonstewort.com SANDERSON � � STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue&Peach Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: AM Peak Hour(7:45-8:45 AA Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida iblixed Use Project North/South Street: Rouse Avenue East/West Street: Peach Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Rouse Avenue Rouse Avenue Peach Street Peach Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Fight Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 7:45 AM 6 89 11 0 106 5 46 13 0 64 23 12 1 0 36 11 6 0 0 17 223 8:00 AM 11 55 15 0 81 3 51 9 0 63 23 9 4 0 36 7 12 1 0 20 200 8:15 AM 21 77 24 0 122 8 78 7 0 93 14 15 4 0 33 10 5 0 0 15 263 8:30 AM 13 53 12 0 78 1 75 2 0 78 19 12 6 - 37 14 2 0 0 16 209 Grand Total 51 1 274 62 0 387 17 250 31 0 1 298 79 48 15 0 142 42 25 1 0 68 895 Medium Truck% 2.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 5.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck% 0.0 2.9 1.6 0.0 2.3 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.4 8.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 Total Truck% 2.0 3.6 1.6 0.0 3.1 5.9 4.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 5.1 4.2 0.0 0.0 4.2 2.4 8.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 Total%1 5.7 1 30.6 1 6.9 1 0-.0t 43.2 1 1.9 1 27.9 3.5 0.0 1 33.3 8.8 5.4 1.7 0.0 1 15.9 4.7 2.8 0.1 0.0 7.6 r 100.0 PHF 0.85 Rouse Avenue In Out 387 307 RT TH LT I U e5l 274 62 0 A `rb N ...1 r V .T. C, 7 00 7 O � y Total Entering C 895 x Pi � o C1l a C " N O 00 4 7 x 1 I Fir r 0 1 31 1 250 1 17 U I LT I TH I RT 354 298 Out In Rouse Avenue 1300 North Tmrstech Way I Bininertono 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 I fcec 406.656'• voww.sondersonste`artxom SANDERSON STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue&Peach Street Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 PD Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Rouse Avenue East/West Street: Peach Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Rouse Avenue Rouse Avenue Peach Street Peach Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 4:30 PM 14 112 12 0 138 3 79 16 0 98 18 15 6 0 39 18 13 1 0 32 307 4:45 PM 10 80 8 0 98 1 77 14 0 92 19 9 8 0 36 27 9 3 0 39 265 5:00 PM 14 122 18 0 154 3 84 29 0 116 22 5 7 0 34 31 14 1 0 46 350 5:15 PM 14 89 10 0 113 3 82 19 0 104 9 13 6 0 28 26 15 0 0 41 286 Grand Total 52 403 48 0 1 503 10 322 78 0 410 68 42 27 0 137 102 51 5 0 158 1208 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 20.0 0.0 1.3 Heavy Truck% 0.0 0.7 2.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Total Truck% 0.0 1.2 2.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 2.0 20.0 0.0 1.9 Total% 4.3 1 33.4 4.0 0.0 41.6 1 0.8 26.7 6.5 0.0 33.9 5.6 3.5 2.2 0.0 11.3 8.4 4.2 0.4 0.0 13.1 100.0 PHF 0.86 Rouse Avenue In Out 503 451 RT TH LT U 52 403 48 1 0 o � � � o Total Entering e V) 1208 x a a � o r N o C n H � 0 78 322 10 U LT TH RT 476 410 Out In Rouse Avenue 1300 North Tronstech Woy ( &.1ings,Montno 59102 1 Fhone 406.656.5255 1 Fox 406.656.0967 www.soridersonsfewad.com SANDERSON &'-p STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue cC Tamarack Steer Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Count Time Period: AM Peak Hour(7:45-8:45 AN Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street•. Rouse Avenue East/West Street: Tamarack Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Rouse Avenue Rouse Avenue Tamarack Street Tamarack Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 7:45 AM 4 99 13 0 116 2 54 5 0 61 1 16 7 0 24 9 6 3 0 18 219 8:00 Atli 12 75 12 0 99 1 55 2 0 58 5 10 15 0 30 17 5 2 0 24 211 8:15 AM 12 117 4 0 133 2 87 2 0 91 5 10 8 0 23 7 6 1 0 14 261 8:30 AM 5 70 5 0 80 2 93 3 0 98 7 17 9 0 33 13 6 1 0 20 231 Grand Total 33 361 34 0 428 7 289 12 0 308 18 53 39 0 110 46 23 7 0 76 922 Medium Truck% 6.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 11.1 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 HeavyTruck% 0.0 2.5 8.8 0.0 2.8 0.0 1.0 8.3 0.0 1.3 5.6 3.8 7.7 0.0 5.5 4.3 17.4 14.3 0.0 9.2 Total Truck% 6.1 3.0 8.8 0.0 3.7 0.0 1.7 8.3 0.0 1.9 16.7 7.5 7.7 0.0 9.1 4.3 21.7 14.3 0.0 10.5 Total%1 3.6 39.2 3.7 0.0 46.4 0.8 31.3 1.3 1 0.0 1 33.4 1 2.0-1 5.7 1 4.2 1 0.0 1 11.9 t 5.0 2.5 0.8 1 0.0 1 8.2 100.0 PHF 0.88 Rouse Avenue In Out 428 374 RT TH LT U 33 361 34 0 ♦- tJ -i 7 GO W T O V P 7 v Total Entering c V g 1 922 y E R ro � 4 D O n 0 co Fir 0 1 12 1 289 1 7 U I LT I TH I RT 386 308 Out In Rouse Avenue 1300 North hardech Way I Blllin xi0ona 59102 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fox 406.6560 1 www.sandewnslewart.com SANDERSON 49' STEWART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: A.Paull Intersection: Rouse Avenue&Tamarack Steet Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Date Performed: Thursday,March 29,2018jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/DIDT Count Time Period: PNI Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 PD Project Number: 06020.03 Project Description: Cottonwood/Ida Mixed Use Project North/South Street: Rouse Avenue East/West Street: Tamarack Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Rouse Avenue Rouse Avenue Tamarack Street Tamarack Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn To all Right Thru Left U-turn Total Ri ht Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 4:30 PM 5 124 3 0 132 3 85 6 0 94 13 6 16 0 35 9 12 4 0M25286 4:45 PM 10 87 6 0 103 2 108 5 0 115 8 12 7 0 27 13 17 1 0276 5:00 PM 9 138 8 0 155 4 96 8 0 10811 12 11 0 34 11 14 5 0327 5:15 PM 6 102 8 0 116 4 103 6 0 113 10 10 11 0 31 9 15 1 0285 Grand Total 30 451 25 0 506 13 392 25 0 430 42 40 45 0 127 :4.8 58 11 0 111 1174 Medium Truck% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HeavyTruck% 3.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 4.8 0.0 2.2 0.0 2.4 5.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 Total Truck% 3.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 9.5 0.0 2.2 0.0 3.9 5.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 Total% 2.6 38.4 2.1 0.0 43.1 1.1 33.4 2.1 0.0 36.6 3.6 3.4 3.8 0.0 10.8 3.6 4.9 0.9 0.0 9.5 1 W 0 PHF 0.90 Rouse Avenue In Out 506 479 RT TH LT U e30 451 25 0 00 In Total Entering c 1174 v V (1 4 � ECD R F � o 10 FT T-1 E~ � a H o V 7 T Fir 0 25 1 392 1 13 U I LT I TH I RT 504 430 Out In AL Rouse Avenue 1300 North Tmnstech Way Vings,Mon!=59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 www.sandersortmewad.com CAPACITY CALCULATIONS - EXISTING CONDITIONS (2018) • v �34�G7a QQ SAND ERSOONSTEWART.COM HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 05/08/2018 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 T T Traffic Volume(vehlh) 0 0 0 9 166 56 42 260 16 _ 39 __ 141 _ 112 Future Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 9 166 56 42 260 16 39 141 112 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1900 1796 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 10 178 60 45 280 17 42 152 120 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 4 0 7 2 2 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 14 251 85 693 1037 63 696 570 450 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow,veh/h 71 1261 425 1061 1744 106 1070 959 757j Grp Volume(v),veh/h 248 0 0 45 0 297 42 0 272 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1757 0 0 1061 0 1850 1070 0 1715 Q Serve(g_s),s 6.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 3.9 1.0 0.0 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 6.6 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 3.9 4.9 0.0 3.9 Prop In Lane. 0.04 0.24 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.44 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 350 0 0 693 0 1100 696 0 1026 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.27 0.06 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(cga),vehlh 1219 0 0 693 0 1100 696 0 1020 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 18.8 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.0 4.9 6.1 0.0 4.9 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(500/o),veh/In 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.0 1.2' Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.5 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 5.5 6.3 0.0 5. LnGrp LOS C A A A A A A A A Approach Vol,veh/h 248 342 314 Approach Delay,s/veh 21.5 5.6 5.7 Appro LOS C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 8 Phs-Duration(G+Y+Rc),s_ 35.2 35.2 15.2 Change Period(Y+Rc),s "5.2 *5.2 5.2 Max Green Setting.(Gmax),s *30 _*30_ 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 6.9 6.9 8.6 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 2.1 1.9 - 1.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay _ 10.0_ HCM 6th LOS A Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 05/08/2018 "', --0. --* (- *-- � 4\ t �► ♦ -4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations c� _� �, 4+ Traffic Volume veh/h 39 53 18 7 __ 23 46 -_12 _ _28_9_- 7 34 361 33 Future Volume(veh/h) 39 53 18 7 23 46 12 289 7 34 361 33 Initial Q Qb,veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) _ 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 01 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1781 1781 1781 1574 1574 1574 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 44 60 20 8 26 52 ~14 328 8 39 410 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 80 8 Percent Heavy_Veh,% 8 8 8 22 22 22 _2 2 2 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 143 111 32 80 59 103 86 1299 31 125 1142 101 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow,veh/h 443 911 260 65 488 846 24 1774 42 74 1560 138, Grp Volume(v),veh/h 124 0 0 86 0 0 350 0 0 487 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1614 0 0 1399 0 0 1839 0 0 1772 0 0, Q Serve(g_s),s 0.7 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.35 0.16 0.09 0.60 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.08 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 285 0 0 242 0 0 1415 0 0 1369 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c=a),veh/h 1205 0 0 1072 0 0 1415 0 0 1369 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 22.7 0.0 0.0 22.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Vile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.8 0.0 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A C A A A A A A A A p ach Vol,vehlh 124 86 350 487 Approach Delay,s/veh 23.8 23.3 2.8 3.4 Appro OLhca S C C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.0 10.6 44.0 10.6 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 5.4 5.8 7.3 5.1 Green Ext Time(p`c),s 2.5 0.8 3.8 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3 HCM 6th LOS A Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak Street/Birch Street 05/08/2018 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 T + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 165 0 190 0 1 0 110 275 0 0 248 105, Future Volume(veh/h) 165 0 190 0 1 0 110 275 0 0 248 105 Initial Q_(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 _ _0__ _0- _ __0 _ 0 __ -0_ 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No M Sar'-' t Flow,vehlh/In 1900 1900 1841 1900 1900 1900 1767 1856 1856 1900 1841 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 177 0 204 0 1 0 118 296 0 0 267 113 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 3 3 0 4 2 Cap,veh/h 341 0 360 0 319 0 660 1266 0 100 1023 880, Arrive On Green 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.06 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow,veh/h 1435 0 1560 0 1900 0 1682 1856 0 1100 1841 1584; Grp Volume(v),veh/h 177 0 204 0 1 0 118 296 0 0 267 113 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1435 0 1560 0 1900 0 1682 1856 0 1100 1841 1584, Q Serve(g_s),s 8.4 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 4.3 0.0 0.0 5.4 2.5 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 8.4 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 4.3 0.0 0.0 5A 2.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 341 0 360 0 319 0 660 1266 0 100 1023 880 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.13 Avail Cap(cga),veh/h 799 0 856 0 924 0 1139 1266 0 100 1023 880, HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1_00 0.00 1.00 -0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00_ 0.00 1.00 1.00, Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 28.5 0.0 24.5 0.0 25.0 0.0 5.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 8.3 7.7 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.8 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.7 0.0 25.9 0.0 25.0 0.0 5.4 4.8 0.0 0.0 8.9 8.0 LnGrp LOS C A C A C A A A A A A A Approach Vol,veh/h 381 1 414 380 Approach Delay,s/veh 27.7 25.0 4.9 8.6 Appro LOS Lhca OS C C__ A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 54.5 17.5 9.1 45.4 17.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.4 5.4 *4.6 5.4 5.4 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 *25 40.0 - _35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 6.3 10.4 3.9 7.4 2.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 2.0 1.6 0.3 2.2- - 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.5 HCM 6th LOS B Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St 05/08/2018 k_ 4% t 10� �► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 4T 4 4 Traffic Volume(vehlh) 47 475 1 0 581 94 1 0 0 100 0 22 Future Volume(veh/h) 47 475 1 0 581 94 1 0 0 100 0 22 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/hlln 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 50 505 1 0 618 100 1 0 0 106 0 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, evCap,h hlhl 122 1133 2 0 1163 188 760 0 0 630 10 118 Arrive On Green 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 Sat Flow,veh/h 157 3026 6 0 3202 502 1452 0 0 1185 22 262 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 273 0 283 0 359 359 1 0 0 129 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1475 0 1714 0 1805 1803 1452 0 0 1468 0 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.5 0.0 8.3 0.0 10.4 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 10.9 0.0 8.3 0.0 10.4 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.28 1.00 0.00 0.82 0.18 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 616 0 642 0 676 675 760 0 0 758 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c=a),veh/h 835 0 898 0 946 945 760 0 0 758 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 15.3 0.0 15.7 0.0 16.3 16.3 10.2 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 "/vile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 0.0 3.1 0.0 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.8 0.0 16.1 0.0 17.0 17.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 F0, LnGrp LOS B A B A B B B A A B A A Approach Vol,veh/h 556 718 1 129 Approach Delay,s/veh 16.0 17.0 10.2 11.5 Approach LOS B B B B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 35.9 30.9 35.9 30.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 30.0 35.0 30.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 2.0 12.9 5.4 12.4 ,Green Ext Time(p=c),s 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.1 HCM 6th LOS B Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 05/08/2018 4\ t j Lane Group WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 248 45 297 42 272 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.07 0.28 0.07 0.27 Control Delay 22.7 6.4 7.0 6.4 5.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.7 6.4 7.0 6.4 5.7 Queue ue Length 50th(ft) 60_ _ 5_ _39 5_ __ 27 Queue Length 95th(ft) 117 20 92 19 71 Internal Link Dist(ft) 419 417 1833 Turn Bay Length(ft) 50 50 Base Capacity_(vph) 1146 610 1078 621 1019 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback CapCap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.07 0.28 0.07 0.27 Intersection Summary Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 05/08/2018 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 124 86 350 487 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.30 0.26 `0.37 Control Delay ^� � 26.1 13.5 4.1 4.8 Queue D al y 0.0 0.0 0.0_ 0.0 Total Delay 26.1 13.5 4.1 4.8 Queue Length 50th(j) 35 10 34 53 Queue Length 95th(ft) 74 40 76 116 Internal Link Dist(ft) 555 547 989 _ 992_ Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 1020 1052 1367 1304 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.08 0.26 0.37 Intersection Summary Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak StreeUBirch Street 05/08/2018 --0. -,* '~ 4\ t 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 177 204 1 118 296 267 113 u/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 _ _0.00 0.17 0.24 0.29 0.14 Control Delay 42.7 3.6 26.0 5.7 6.2 13.9 5.3 Queu D y _ _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.7 3.6 26.0 5.7 6.2 13.9 5.3 Quer ue Length 50th(ft) 82 0 0 17 49 72 7 Queue Length 95th(ft) 153 38 4 43 104 152 39 Internal Link Dist(ft)=_ 553 170 992 418 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 215 80 Base Capacity(vph)_ 623_ 977 840 853 1622 923 824 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.28 0.21 0.00 0.14 0.18 0.29 0.14 Intersection Summary r Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St 05/08/2018 t 1 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 556 718 1 _129 u/c Ratio 0.50 0.54 0.00 0.20 Control Delay 17.9 17.3 11.0 8.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.9 17.3 11.0 8.9 Queue Length 50th() 89 112 0 20 Queue Length 95th(ft) 132 160 3 51 Internal Link Dist(ft) 3.00 185 172 257 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 1545 1847 569 659 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.39 0.00 0.20 Intersection Summary Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 • a • HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 05/08/2018 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 T+ 1� Traffic Volume_(vehlh) -- - 0 _ 0- 0 7 214 59 79 317 9 38 265 157; Future Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 7 214 59 79 317 9 38 265 157 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1900 1885 1900 1856 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885; Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 8 249 69 92 369 10 44 308 183 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 1 0 3 2 2 0 1 1 Cap,veh/h 10 308 85 501 1079 29 607 657 391, Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Sat Fl6w,veh/h 40 1234 342 897 1811 49 1014 1104 656, Grp Volume(v),veh/h 326 0 0 92 0 379 44 0 491 Grp Sr at Flow(s),veh/h/In 1616 0 0 897 0 1861 1014 0 1759 Q Serve(g_s),s 12.7 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 6.9 1.5 0.0 10.5 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 12.7 0.0 -0.0 14.8 0.0 6.9 8.5 0.0 10.5 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.21 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.37 Lane Grp Cap(c),-veh/h 403 - 0_ 0 501 0 1108 607 0 1048 VIC Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.34 0.07 0.00 0.47 Avai CI Cl ap�=a),veh/h 843 0 0 501 0 1108 607 0 1048 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.7 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 6.9 9.0 0.0 7.6 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50°/o),veh/In 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 3.8, Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.6 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.0 7.7 9.3 0.0 9.1; LnGrp LOS C A A B A A A A A Approach Vol,veh/h - -- _326 - 471 535 Approach Delay,s/veh 27.6 8.7 9.1 Appro hh LOS - C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s _ 45.2 - _ __ 45.2_ 21.9 ) Change Period(Y+Rc),s *5.2 *5.2 5.2 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s *40 _ *40- _ 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 16.8 12.5 14.7 Green Ext Time(pc),s _ _ --__ -3.1 _ - 4.0 2.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.5 HCM 6th LOS B Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 05/08/2018 --* --0- ---* 'r *-- *.- ~*\ t �► l 4, Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR, Lane Configurations _ 4) _ _� � 4_ _ Traffic Volume(veh/h) V 45 40 42 11 58 42 25 392 13 25 451 30 Future Volume(veh/h) _ 45 40 42 11 58 42 25 392_ 13 25 451 30 Initial Q Qb ,veh _ __0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 -_0 0_ 0 0 _ 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj__ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 AO_ 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00, Work Zone On Approach No No No __ _ No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In- 1900 1900 1900 1826 18-2 11826 1885 1885 1885 __1885 1885 188$ Adj_Flow Rate,veh/h 50 44 47 12 64 47 28 436 14 28 501 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 0 5 5 5 1 _ 1 _ 1 1 _ 1 1 Cap,veh/h _ 149 83 72 83_ 121 82 103 1255 _39 98 1223 78 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow,veh/h 479 656 568 89 957 647 46 1723 53 40 1680 107� Grp Volume(v),veh/h 141 0 0 123 0 0 _ 478 0 0 562 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1703 0 0 1692_ 0 0 1823 0 0 1827 0 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s _ 4.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0 0, Prop In Lane 0.35 0.33 0.10 0.38 0.06 0.03 0.05 _0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 304 0 0 286 0 0 1396 0 0 1398_ 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 1237 0 0 1273 0 0 1396 0 0 1398 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 22.7 0.0 0.0 22.6 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0, Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.8 0.0 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 3.8 LnGrp LOS C A A C A A A A A A A A - - ------ - -- --- ------ - - - -- --- - - -------------- Approach Vol,veh/h 141 1-23 478- ---5- 62 Approach Delay,s/veh 23.8 23.6 3.4 3.8 Appro LOS C C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.0 11.0 44.0 11.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s _7.1 6.0 8.4 5.7 Green Ext Time(pc),s 3.7 0.9 4.5 0.8 Intersection Summary ,HCM 6th Ctd Delay 7.7 HCM 6th LOS A Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak Street/Birch Street 05/08/2018 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r +T+ T+ I t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 131 3 151 1 1 0 233 257 0 0 361 2M Future Volume(veh/h) 131 3 151 1 1 0 233 257 0 0 361 206 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking B_us,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1900 1885 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 144 3 166 1 1 0 256 282 0 0 397 226 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91i Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 2 Cap,veh/h 303 4 421 110 88 0 594 1281 0 96 1001 841;' Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.09 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Sat Flow,veh/h 1212 25 1588 220 511 0 1810 1870 0 1115 1885 1584 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 147 0 166 2 0 0 256 282 0 0 397 226 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1237 0 1588 731 0 0 1810 1870 0 1115 1885 1584 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 9.4 5.9 Cycle QClear(g c),s 9.1 0.0 6.5 9.1 0.0 0.0 4.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 9.4 5.9 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 307 0 421 197 0 0 594 1281 0 96 1001 841; V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.27 Avail Cl ap c-a),vehlh 729 0 886 635 0 0 1026 1281 0 96 1001 841 HCM Platoon Ratio •1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00_ 1.00_ - 1.00 0.00_ 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 29.6 0.0 22.7 26.2 0.0 0.0 6.6 4.4 0.0 0.0 10.5 9.7 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5_ _0.4- _0.0_ _0.0_ 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /oile_BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.5 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 2.1' Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh ` LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 30.8 0.0 23.3 26.2 0.0 0.0 7.1 4.8 0.0 0.0 11.7 10.5 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A A A A A B B Approach Vol,vehlh 313 2 538 623 Approach Delay,slveh 26.8 26.2 5.9 11.2 Appro LOS Lhac OS C C A B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 ,Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s _--- ----57 O---- - -- - 16.3 11.6 45.4 18.3 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.4 5.4 *4.6 5.4 5.4 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 *25 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 6.2 11.1 6.3 11.4 11.1 Green Ext Time(p=c),s 1.9- _ 1.3_ 0.7 _ _3.6 0.0 - - -_ Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.6 HCM 6th LOS B Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St 05/08/2018 .,,* --V ,(- 4-- t4\ T �► 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41 +TT 4T+ 4 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 94 647 2 0 621 115 1 0 0 140 0 48 Future Volume(veh/h) 94 647 2 0 621 115 1 0 0 140 0 48 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 104 719 2 0 690 128 1 0 0 156 0 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh,% 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap,vehlh 147 1070 3 0 1281 237 684 0 0 535 11 160 Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.43 Sat Flow,veh/h 212 2501 7 0 3090 555 1393 0 0 1072 26 373 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 367 0 458 0 412 406 1 0 0 209 0 0 Grp-Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1006 0 1714 0 1791 1760 1394 0 0 1471 0 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 15.0 0.0 17.1 0.0 14.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle QClear(g c),s 29.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 14.0 14.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0, Prop In Lane 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.32 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.25 Lane-Grp Cap(c),veh/h 487 0 733 0 766 753 684 0 0 706 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(cca),veh/h 563 0 838 0 876 861 684 0 0 706 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter 1)- 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 22.4 0.0 18.3 0.0 17.4 17.4 13.4 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 4.9 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0, Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1$ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 7.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 5.7 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp_Delay(d),s/veh 27.3 0.0 19.5 0.0 18.0 18.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A B A B B B A A B A A Approach Vol,veh/h - 825 818 1 209� Approach Delay,s/veh 22.9 18.0 13.4 16.6 Approach LOS C B B B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 40.9 40.9 40.9 40.9 - Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 35.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 2.0 31.1 9.6 16.0 Green Ext Time-(p c),s 0.0 3.9 1.3 _ _ 5.9_ Intersection Summary ,HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.0 HCM 6th LOS C Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report I Page 4 11 Queues 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 05/08/2018 .— 4\ Lane Group WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 326 92 379 44 491 u/c Ratio 0.71 0.20 0.34 0.08 0.46 Control Delay 30.5 9.2 8.9 7.8 9.5 Queue_Delay_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.5 9.2 8.9 7.8 9.5 ,Queue_Length 50th(ft) _ 115 _ 15_ 69 7 87 Queue Length 95th(ft) 181 45 145 23 187 Internal Link Dist(ft) 419 417 1833 Turn Bay Length(ft) 50 50 Base Capacity_(vph) 945 461 1105 564 1060 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.20 0.34 0.08 0.46 Intersection Summary Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 05/08/2018 T 1 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 141 123 478 562 vlc Ratio _ 0.54 0.41_ 0_.35 0_.41 Control Delay 24.2 18.5 4.6 5.1 Queue Delay_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.2 18.5 4.6 5.1 Queue Length 50th_(ft) 32 24 50 63 Queue Length 95th(ft) 78 63 115 143 Internal Link Dist ft 555 547 989 992 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 1005 1150 1353 1356 _ Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Ratio 0.14 0.11 0.35 0.411 Intersection Summary Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak Street/Birch Street 05/08/2018 t 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 147 166 2 256 282 397 226 v/c� Ratio 0.64 0.26 0.01 0.37 0.22 0.43 0.28 Control Delay 46.1 3.5 29.0 6.3 5.5 17.7 8.7 Queue l y _ _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 46.1 3.5 29.0 6.3 5.5 17.7 8.7 Quer ue Length 50th(it) 71 0 1 38 44 126 30 Queue Length 95th(ft) 142 33 7 84 94 263 95 Internal Link Dist(ft) 553 _170 992 418 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 215 80 Base Capacity(vph) 567 853 720 850 1573 913 810 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.19 0.00 0.30 0.18 0.43 0.28 Intersection Summary Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St 05/08/2018 t 1 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 825 818 1 209 vlc Ratio__ 0.85 _0.56 0.00� 0.33 Control Delay 31.0 18.5 15.0 15.4 _ Queue Delay_ 0.0 0.0 _0.0 _ 0.0 Total Delay �31.0 18.5 15.0 15.4 Queue Length 50th(ft) 191 152 0 56 _ Queue Length 95th(ft) 270 205 4 119 Internal Link Dist(ft) 300 185 172 257 4 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 1149 1733 526 629 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback CapCap Reductn ,_ 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.47 0.00 0.33 Intersection Summary Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Rouse Ave & Peach St 05/08/2018 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 5.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ +T+ 4 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 15 48 79 1 25 42 31 250 17 62 274 51 Future Vol,veh/h 15 48 79 1 25 42 31 250 17 62 274 51 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - Ueh in Median.Storage,#_ _ 0_ 0 - 0 - 0 _- Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor _ _ 85 85 _ 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 4 5 0 8 2 0 4 6 2 4 2 Mvmt Flow 18 56 93 1 29 49 36 294 20 73 322 60 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 913 884 352 949 904 304 382 0 0 314 0 0 498 _ 498 -_ 376 376 - - - - - - - Stage 2 415 386 - 573 528 - - - ,Critical dwy 7.1 6.54 6.25 7.1 _6.58_ 6.22_ 41— -_ 4.12 - _ - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.54 - 6.1 5.58 - - - Critical_Hdvuy St g 2 6.1 5.54 - 6.1 5.58 - - - _ - _ - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4.036 3.345 3.5 4.072 3.318 2.2 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 256 282 685 242 271 736 1188 - -_ 1246 - -_ Stage 558 541 - 649 606 - - - Stage 2 619 607 - 508 518 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked,% M2v_Cap-1_Maneuver 199 251 685 159 241 736 1188 1246 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 199 251 - 159 241 - - - - Stage_1__ 537 500 - _ 625 584 _ - - _ - _ - Stage 2 528 585 - 360 479 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 22.3 16 0.8 1.3 J HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLnlWBLnl _SBL SBT SBR Capaci veh/h — 11.88 - _- 372 407. 1246 _- _ - tY(veh/ ) HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - 0.449 0.197 0.059 - HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 0 - 22.3 16 8.1 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A C C A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 2.2 0.7 0.2 - - Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report • Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Rouse Ave & Peach St 05/08/2018 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 15.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations cl� *T+ +T+ 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 27 42 68 5 51 102 78 322 10 48 403 52 Future Vol,veh/h 27 42 68 5 51 102 78 322 10 48 403 52 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0_ 0 _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - _- 0 _ - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 2 0 20 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 Mvmt Flow 31 49 79 6 59 119 91 374 12 56 469 60 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1262 1179 499 1237 1203 380 529 0 0 .386 0 0 Stage1 611 611 - 562 562 - - - - - - Stage 2 651 568 - 675 641 - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.52 6.2 7.3 6.52 6.21__4.11 _ - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.52 - 6.3 5.52 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.52 - 6.3 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4.018 3.3 3.68 4.018 3.309 2.209 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 148 190 576 140 184 669 1043 - - 1172 - - Stage 1 484 484 - 481 510 - - - Stage 2 461 506 - 416_ 469 - _ __- __ - - - - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1-Maneuver 75 _158_ _576 80 153 669 1043 - - 1172 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 75 158 - 80 153 - - - Stage 1 430 451 - 428 453 - - Stage 2 293 450 - 298 437 - Kpproach EB WB NB SB HCM Confrol Delay,s_-86.7' 37.2 _ _ _ _ 1.7 -.8 - HCM LOS F E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1043 - - 184__288_1172 - - !� HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 - - 0.866 0.638 0.048 - HCM Control Delay(s_) 8.8 0_ - 86.7 37.2 8.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - F E A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 6.3 4 0.1 - i y Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Ida Ave & Cottonwood St 05/08/2018 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 +T* +T+ 41+ Sign Control Yield_ Yield Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 2 0 3 1 0 0 2 10 0 0 9 2 Future Volume(v_ph) 2 0 3 1 0 0 2 10 0 0 9 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Hourly flow rate_(yph) 4 0 5 2 0 0 4 18_ 0 0 16 4.' Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 ,Volume Total(vph) 9_ _2 22 20 Volume Left(vph) 4 2 4 0 ,Volume Right(vph) 5 0 0_ _ 4 Hadj(s) 0.51 0.20 0.33 0.20 Departure Headway(s) 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.1_ Degree Utilization,x 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.02 Capacity_(v-eh/h) 786 _843 _827 860 Control Delay(s) 7.6 7.2 7.4 7.2 Apprr oath Del ay_(§) 7.6 7.2 7.4 7.2 __ Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.4 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) _ 15_ Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 23: Ida Ave & Aspen St 05/08/2018 'r 4.�- t `► l Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y T Sign Control _ Yield Yield _ Yield 4 Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 7 0 0 10� Future Volume(vph) 0 0 7 0 0 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Hourly flow rate(v_ph) 0 _0 10 0 Oi 14 Direction,Lane# WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Total(Volume vph) 0 10 14 ] Volume Left(vph) 0 0 0 Volume Right(vph) 0 0 0 Hadj(s) 0.00 0.24 0.17 Departure Headway_(s) 4.0 4.2 4.1 Degree Utilization,x 0.00 0.01 0.02 Capacity(veh/h) 900 853 877 Control Delay(s) 7.0 7.2 7.1 Approach Delay(s) 0.0 _ 7.2 7.1 Approach LOS A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.2 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 y HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 24: Front St & Aspen St s 05/08/2018 '1 Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT Lane Configurations Y $� Sign Control_ Yield Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 Future Volume(vph) - 0 0 2 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Hourly flow rate(yph) 0 0_ 8 0__ 0 0 Direction,Lane# EB 1 SE 1 NW 1 Volume Total(v_ph) 0 8_ 0 Volume Left(vph) 0 0 0 Volume Right(yph) _ 0 ___ 0_ 0 Hadj(s) 0.00 0.85 0.00 Departure Headway—(s) 3.9 4.8 3.9 Degree Utilization,x 0.00 0.01 0.00 Capacity(vehlh) 912 754 916 Control Delay(s) 6.9 7.8 6.9 Appr�oach`Delay(s) 0.0 7.8_ 0.0 Approach LOS A A A intersection Summary Delay 7.8 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 25: Ida Ave & Front St 05/08/2018 T 1 t Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations` 1� +T Y Sign Control __Yield Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 7 0 2 10 0 0 Future Volume(vph) i__ 7 _0 2 10 _0 _ 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79� 0.79 Hourly flow rate(vph) 9 0 3 13 0 0 Direction,Lane# NB 1 SB 1 NW 1 Volume Total(vph)_- 9 16 0 _ Volume Left(vph) 0 3 0 Volume Right(vph)_ 0 0 0 Hadj(s) 0.24 0.18 0.00 Departure Headway(s) 4.2 4.1 4.0 Degree Utilization,x 0.01 0.02 0.00 Capacity(yehlh) 853 876 900 Control Delay(s) 7.2 7.2 7.0 Approach Delay(s) 7.2 7.2 0.0 Approach LOS A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.2 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period_(min) 15 Existing(2018)AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 • . • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Ida Ave & Cottonwood St 05/08/2018 --* --* --* ' � *-- 4\ t �► 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 +T+ 4 +T+ Sign Control Yield __ Yield Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 15 0 0 26 2 Future Volume(vph) 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 15 0 0 26 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 22 0 0 39 3 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total(vph) 3 4 22 42 3 Volume Left(vph) 0 1 0 0 Volume Right(vph)_ 3 0 0 3 Hadj(s) -0.60 0.69 0.12 0.08 Departure Headway(s) 3.4 4.7 4.1 4.0 Degree Utilization,x 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.05 Capacity(veh/h) 1020 747 868 889 Control Delay(s) 6.5 7.8 7.2 7.2 Appro ch Delay(s) 6.5 7.8 7.2 7.2 Approach LOS A A A A ntersection Summary Delay 7.2 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analyses is Period(min) 15 Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 23: Ida Ave & Aspen St 05/08/2018 4e t t �► 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y T #T Sign Control _ Yield Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 2 0 17 0 0 24 Future Volume(vph) 2 0 17 __0 __ 0 _ _ 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Hourly flow rate(vph) 3 0 24 0 0 33 Direction,Lane# WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total_(v_ph) 3 24 33 Volume Left(vph) 3 0 0 Volume Right(vph) 0 0 0 Hadj(s) 1.05 0.10 0.00 Departure Headway(s) __ 5.1 _ 4.0 3.9 _ Degree Utilization,x 0.00 0.03 0.04 Capacity(veh/h) _ _697 876 909 Control Delay(s) 8.1 7.2 7.1 Approach Delay(s) 8.1 7.2 7.1_ Approach LOS A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.2 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) _ 15 ;a V. fY Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 24: Front St & Aspen St 05/08/2018 Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT Lane Configurations Y T +T Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 3 0 2 4 Future Volume(vph) 0 0 3 0 2 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hourly flow rate(YOL 0 0 4 0 3 5 Direction,Lane# EB 1 SE 1 NW 1 Volume Total(vph) 0 4 _ 8 Volume Left(vph) 0 0 3 Volume Right(vph) __ __0_ 0 _ 0 Hadj(s) 0.00 0.56 0.39 Departure Headway(§)_ _ 3.9 4.5 4.3 Degree Utilization,x 0.00 0.00 0.01 Capacity_(veh/h) 910 801 825 Control Delay(s) 6.9 7.5 7.3 Apprr oach Delay_(§) 0.0 7.5 _ 7.3_ Approach LOS A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.4 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 25: Ida Ave & Front St 05/08/2018 T ♦ f-% ti Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations '+ 4 Y Sign Control Yield_ _ _ Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 17 0 4 24 0 4 Future Volume(vph) 17 0 4 24 0 4 ` Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Hourly flow_rate_(vph) 22 0 5 31 0 5 Direction,Lane# NB 1 SB 1 NW 1 Volume Total(vph)_ _ ___ 22 36 b Volume Left(vph) 0 5 0 Volume Right(vph) 0 0 5 Hadj(s) 0.10 0.03 -0.60 Departure Headway-(s)- 4.0 4.0 3.4 Degree Utilization,x 0.02 0.04 0.00 Capacity(vehlh) 874 903 1027 Control Delay(s) 7.1 7.1 6.4 Approach Delay(s) 7.1 7.1 6.4 Approach LOS A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.1 , Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 u r C Existing(2018)PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 I OPACITY CALCULATIONS - FULL BUILDOUT (2020) v JAN 8 I_ CQ�l1Uil�IVI lY L}tS(L!Ui'�4��_r�_��' HCM 6th TWSC 23: Ida Ave & Aspen St 01/17/2019 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 3.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *T* 4# _ _* _ _ 4+ _ Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 2 2 T 0 4^- 0 3 _7 0 2 T 11 0 Future Vol,veh/h 0 �2 2 0 4 0 3 7 0 2 11 0_ _ Conflicting Peds,Whr 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control _Stop Stop_Stop Stop Stop _Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free_ RT Channelized__ _T- - None - - None --None - None Storage Length - - _ Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - __ _ 0 - = 0 - - -_0 Grade,% _- 0 _ - _ _0 - - 0 - - 0_ - Peak Hour Facto_r _ 71 71 71 -71 71 _ 71 7_1_71 71 71 71 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow _ 0 3 3 0 66 0 4 10 0 3 15 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 42 39 15 42 39 10 15 0. 0 10 0 0 Stage 1 21 21 - 18 18 - - - - - - - Stage 2 21 18 - 24 21 - - - - - Critical Hdwy- 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.1 6.52 6_.22 4.12 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.1 5.52 - - - .Critical SwyHl dd tg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.1 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.5 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 961 853 1065 966 853 1071 1603 - - 1610 - - Stage1 998 878 - 1006 880 - - - - Stage 2 9.98 8.80_ - 999 878 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 952 849 1065 957 849 1071 1603 - - 1610 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 952 849 - 957 849 - - - Stage 995 876 _- 1003 877 - - - - - - Stage 2 989 877 - 991 876 - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s - 8.8 9.3 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLnlWBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1603 - - 945 849 1610 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.006 0.007 0.002 - HCM Control Delay-(s) _7_.3 0 - 8.8 9.3 7.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - - Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 25: Site Access & Aspen St 01/17/2019 !ntersection Int Delay,slveh 4.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ +T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 40- 7_ 0 27 4 Future Vol,vehlh 0 40 7 0 27 4 Conflicting Peds,Whr 0 0 0 0__ 0 _ 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - Ueh in Median Storage,# 0_ - - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 43 8 0 29 4 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 43 0 38 22 Stage 1_-_ - _ - - - 22 - Stage 2 - 16 - Crit Hlcai dwy - ___- 4.12 - _6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2�_- - - _5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1566 _ - -974 1055 Stage 1 - - 1001 - Stage - - 1007 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1566_ _- 969-_1055 ov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 969 - Stage 1 - - - _ _- 1001 - Stage 2 - 1002 r Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 7.3 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity_(veh/h) 979 - - 1566 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.034 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.8 - - 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Ida Ave & Cottonwood St 01/17/2019 --* -10. ---* � � � � t �► l Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBA Lane Configurations + *T+ 44 _ Sign Control '_ � _Yield _ Yield � _!_�__ Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 20 3 1 0 0 2 140 0 11 2 Future Volume(v_ph) ^' 2 0 3 1 0 0 2 14 0 0 "11 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 _0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Hourly flow rate(vph) _4 0 _ 5 _ 2 0 _ 0 4 25� _ 0 0 20 4 Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total(vph) 9 2 29 24 Volume Left(vph) 4 2 4 0 Volume Right(yph) 5 0 _ 0 4 Hadj(s) 0.51 0.20 0.29 0.20 Departure Headway(s) _ 4.5^ 4.2 T 4.2 �4.2 Degree Utilization,x 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.03 Capacity(veh/h) 780 836 833 859 T Control Delay(s) 7.6 7.2 7.4 7.3 Approach Delay_(§) 7.6 7.2 7.4 7.3 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.4 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min)_ 15 Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + T+ T+ Traffic Volume_(veh/h) 0 0 0_ 9 175 _ 59__ 44 280 17 41 152 119, Future Volume(vehlh) 0 0 0 9 175 59 44 280 17 41 152 119 Initial 0(Qb),_veh - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1900 1841 1900 1796 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 10 188 63 47 301 18 44 163 128 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 4 0 7 2 2 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 14 263 88 667 1027 61 668 565 444 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow,veh/h 67 1266 424 1043 1746 104 1048 961 755 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 261 0 0 47 0 319 44 0 291 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 0 0 1043 0 1851 1048 0 1716 Q Serve(g_s),s 7.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 4.4 1.1 0.0 4.3 Cycle Q Clear(g p.,s 7.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 4.4 5.5_ 0.0 _ 4.3 Prop In Lane 0.04 0.24 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.44 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 365 0 0 667 0 1089 668 0 1009 V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.29 0.07 0.00 0.29 Avai p(cCa),veh/h 1206 0 0 667 0 1089 668 0 1009 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 18.8 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 5.2 6.6 0.0 5.2 Incr Delay 02),s/veh 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),y_eh/In 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.0 1.3 Unsig.Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.4 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 5.9 6.8 0.0 5.9 LnGrp LOS C A A A A A A A A - -_ r z- - - - - - - - -- ._---_- -. - --= -- Approach Vol,yeh/h - - 261 366 335 Approach Delay,slveh 21.4 6.0 6.0 Appro� ach LOS C A A (Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s -35.2 35.2 15.8 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *5.2 *5.2 5.2 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s *30_ - *30 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 7.5 7.5 9.0 Green Ext Time =S),s 2.2 - 2.1 1.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay - 10.2 HCM 6th LOS B Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Rouse Ave & Peach St 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r _ t r T+ T Traffic Volume(veh/h) 16 55 83 6 29 44 33 263 25 65 288 - 53 -------- ----------------------------------- -- ------- Future Volume(veh/h) 16 55 83 6 29 44 33 263 25 65 288 53 Initial Q(Qb) veh _ 0____ 0 _-___ 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0-- 0_- 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 __1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 01 0 Work Zone On Approach _ No No No _ No Adj_Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1900 1841 1826 1900 1781 18_70 1900 _1841 -1841 1870 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 19 65 98 7_ 34 52 39 309 29_ 76 339 62 Peak Hour Factor _ __0.85 _ 0.85 0._8.5 _0.85 0_.85__0.85 0.85__ _0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85; Percent Heavy_Veh,% 0 _4 _ 5_ 0 8 2 0 __ 4 4 2 _ 4 4 Cap,veh/h _ 213 178 221 186 173 261 711 1005 94_ _766 _ 951 _4 Arrive On Green _ 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.61 0_.61 0.07 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow,veh/h 1332 1841 1547 1242 1781 1585 1810 1657 156 1781 1514 2771 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 19 65 98 7 34 52 39 0 338 76 0 401 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1332 1841 1547 1242 1781 1585 1810 0 1813 _ 1781 0 1791 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.9 2.2 3.9 0.4 1.2 1.9 0.5 0.0 _6.1 1.0 0.0 7.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 2.1 2.2 3.9 2.6 _ 1.2 1.9 0.5 0.0 6.1 1.0 0.0 7.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 213_ 178 221 186 173_ 261 711 0 1099 766 0 1125 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.36 0.44 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.00 0.31 0.10 0.00 0.36 Av lai Cap(c_a),veh/h 591 701 _660 539 678 710 826 0 1099 868 0 1125, HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 28.9 28.4 26.4 29.6 28.0 24.3 4.4 0.0 6.4 4.0 0.0 6.0 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 0.2 1.2 1.4 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0. Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.0 1.5 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.0 2.2 0.3 0.0 2.5 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.1 29.7 27.8 29.7 28.5 24.6 4.4 0.0 7.1 4.1 0.0 6.9 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C A A A A A A -- -- -- --- - --- - - - - - ----- -- - - - -- - - ----- -- - Approach Vol,veh/h 182 _ 93 377 477- - Approach Delay,s/veh 28.6 26.4 6.8 6.4 Appro Lhac OS C C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 P_hs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 9.1 46.2 11.9 7.7 47.6 11.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4.6 5.4 5.4 *4.6 5.4 5.4 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s *8.4 40.8 25.6 *7.4 41.8 25.6 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.0 8.1 5.9 2.5 9.2 4.6 Green Ext Time(p c),s_ 0.1 2.4 0.7 0.0 2.9 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.8 HCM 6th LOS B Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary , 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 4� +T+ +T+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) 41 58 19 7 26 56 13 304 7 48 379 35 Future Volume(vehlh) 41 58 19 7 26 56 13 304 7 48 379 35 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1574 1574 1574 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 47 66 22 8 30 64 15 345 8 55 431 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh,% 8 8 8 22 22 22 2 2 2 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 144 119 34 77 60 113 86 1287 29 151 1089 96, Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow,veh/h 437 924 265 53 467 876 25 1773 40 109 1500 132 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 135 0 0 102 0 0 368 0 0 526 0 0 Grp Sr at Flow(s),veh/hlln 1626 0 0 1396 0 0 1838 0 0 1742 0 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 4.1 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.0 0.0, Prop In Lane 0.35 0.16 0.08 0.63 0.04 0.02 0.10 0.08 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 297 0 0 250 0 0 1402 0 0 1337 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 Avair I Cap(c a),veh/h 1194 0 0 1063 0 0 1402 0 0 1337 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 22.7 0.0 0.0 22.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 File BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.6 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.8 0.0 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 __3.0_ _ 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A C A A A A A A A A Approach_Vol,veh/h 135 102 368 526 1 Approach Delay,s/veh 23.8 23.6 3.0 3.8 Appro Lhca OS C C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.0 -_ 11.1 44.0 11.1 -T] Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Settingng(Gmax),s 40.0 40.0 40.0_ 40.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 5.7 6.1 8.1 5.7 Green Ext Time(pc),s _2.7 --- 0.9_ _ 4.2 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay _ _ _ __ 7.7 HCM 6th LOS A Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak Street/Birch Street 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBA Lane Configurations *T r 4+ _ ►� >� t r Traffic Volume(vehlh)__ ___173__ 0 207 _0 1 0 121 292 _ 0 0 266 110 Future Volume(veh/h) 173 0 207 0 1 0 121 292 0 0 266 110 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 _0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 __ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06, Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/hlln _ 1900 1900 1841 1900 1900 1900 1767 1856 1856 1900 1841 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 186 0 223 0 1 0 130 314 0 0 286 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93, Percent Heavy Veh,% _ _ 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 3 3 0 4 2 Cap,veh/h _ _ 354 0 377 0 338 _ 0 636 1251 0 99 1008 8671 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00�0.06 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 Sat Flow,veh/h 1435 0 1560 0 1900 0 1682 1856 0 1082 1841 1584, Grp Volume(v),veh/h 186 0 223 0 1 0 130 314 0 0 286 118 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/ln 1435 0 1560 0 1900 0 1682 1856 0 1082 1841 1584 Q Serve(g_s),s 8.9 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 6.1 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 9.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 6.1 _2.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 354 0 377 0 338 0 636 1251 0 99 1008 867� V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.14 Avail c- ,veh/h 787 0 847 0 911 0 1105 1251 0 99 1008 8671 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 28.4 0.0 24.5 0.0 24.7 0.0 5.7 4.7 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.1 Incr Delay d2),s/veh 1.2 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7--( 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.9 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.6 0.0 26.0 0.0 24.7 0.0 5.8 5.1 0.0 0.0 9.6 8.4 LnGrp LOS C A C A C A A A A A A A Approach Vol,veh/h 409 1 444 404 Approach Delay,s/veh 27.6 24.7 5.4 9.2 Approach LOS C C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+'O ;,s 54.6 18.4 9.2 45.4 16-A Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.4 5.4 '4.6 5.4 5.4 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 *25 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 6.8 11.2 4.2 8.1 2.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 2.1 1.8 0.3 2.3 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctd- Delay 13.9 HCM 6th LOS B Notes HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 f . � I HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary y 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St ; 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4T +TT 4 4 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 49 504 1 0 617 106 1 0 0 109 0 23 Future Volume(veh/h) 49 504 1 0 617 106 1 0 0 109 0 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking.Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Say' t Flow,vehlh/ln 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 52 536 1 0 656 113 1 0 0 116 0 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap,veh/h 117 1115 2 0 1151 198 762 0 0 635 9 113 Arrive On Green 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 Sat Flow,veh/h 143 2980 6 0 3169 529 1456 0 0 1194 21 251 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 287 0 302 0 385 384 1 0 0 140 0 0 Grp S at Flow(s),veh/h/In 1414 0 1714 0 1805 1798 1456 0 0 1467 0 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.8 0.0 8.9 0.0 11.3 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 Cycle QClear c),s 12.1 0.0 8.9 0.0� 11.3 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.00 0.00 0.83 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 593 0 642 0 676 673 762 0 0 757 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Avaiill^Cap(cca),veh/h 809 0 898 0 946 942 762 0 0 757 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 15.5 0.0 15.9 0.0 16.6 16.6 10.2 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay_02),s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0, Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /oile_B-ackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.1 0.0 3.4 0.0 4.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.1 0.0 16.4 0.0 17.4 17.4 10.2 0.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A B A B B B A A B A A Approach-Vol,vehlh ---_ ---589 - 769_ 1 140 ) Approach Delay,s/veh 16.3 17.4 10.2 11.7 Approach LOS - B B B B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 35.9 30.9� 35.9- 30.9 } Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Max Green Setting(Grn ),s 30.0 - --- -_ 35.0 _ 30.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 2.0 14.1 5.8 13.4 Green Ext Time(p.c),s 0.0 4.1 0.8 5.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.4 } HCM 6th LOS B Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 01/17/2019 4\ t `* 1 Lane Group WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 261 47 319 44_291 v/c Ratio — 0.62 0.08 0.30 0.07 0.29 Control Delay 22.9 6.7 7.4 6.6 6.1 Queue Delay __0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.9 6.7 _ 7.4 6.6 _6.1 Queue Length 50th(ft) 64 6 44 _5 __30 Queue Length 95th(ft) 123 21 102 20 79 _ Internal Link Dist(ft) 419 _ 417 _ 1833 Turn Bay Length_(ft) 50 50 Base Capacity(vph) 1144 593 1066 601 1007 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 _ Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 _ Reduced vlc Ratio 0.23 0.08 0.30 0.07 0.29 Intersection Summary Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 0 • Queues 2: Rouse Ave & Peach St-. 01/17/2019 --* `� 1 �► 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 19 65 98 7 34 52 39 338 76 401 ulc Ratio 0.12 0.31 0.22 0.05 0.17 0.12 0.05 0.28 0.09 0.34 Control Delay 30.0 33.2 6.1 28.7 30.5 6.7 3.0 8.2 3.1 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.0 33.2 6.1 28.7 30.5 6.7 3.0 8.2 3.1 8.3 Auer' ue Length 50th @)_ __ 8 27_ 0 3 _ _14 0 3 67 7 80 Queue Length 95th(ft) 25 58 27 13 36 21 10 117 17 137 Internal Link Dist(f4)_ 422 423 1833 989 Turn Bay Length(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Base Capacity(v_ph) 512 670 474 498 645 473 794 1192 852 1195 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.10 0.21 0.01 0.05 0.11 0.05 0.28 0.09 0.34 Intersection Summary- Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 01/17/2019 —♦ t 1 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow_(vph) 135_ 102 368 526 _ v/c Ratio _ 0.52 0.33 0.27_ 0.42 _ Control Delay 26.6 13.1 4.3 5.4 Queue Delay _ _ 0.0 _0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.6 13.1 4.3 5.4 _ Queue Length 50th(ft-L 38 11 38 62 Queue Length 95th(ft) 80 44 84 136 Internal Link Dist(ft) 555 547 989 992 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 1004 1060 1353 1266 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 _ Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.10 0.27 0.42 Intersection Summary Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak Street/Birch Street 01/17/2019 Lane Group EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 186 223 1 130 314 286 118 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.31 0.00 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.15 Control Delay 43.3 3.5 26.0 6.0 6.6 14.8 5.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.3 3.5 26.0 6.0 6.6 14.8 5.9 ,Queue-Le ngth 50th(ft) 87 0 0 19 __ 54 80 9 Queue Length 95th(ft) 161 38 4 49 114 170 43 Internal Link Dist(ft) 553 _ 170 992 418 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 215 80 Base Capacity(v_ph) 615 986 828 833 _1600 910_ 813 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.23 0.00 0.16 0.20 0.31 0.15 Intersection Summary r Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St 01/17/2019 t 1 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 589 769 1 140 u/c Ratio 0.54 0.57 0.00 0.22 Control Delay 18.4 17.6 11.0 9.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.4 17.6 11.0 9.5 Queue Length 50th(ft) 96 122 0 23 Queue Length 95th(ft) 142 172 3 59 Internal Link Dist(ft) 300 185 172 257 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(vph) 149_0 183.3 560 6.51 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced We Ratio 0.40 0.42 0.00 0.22 Intersection Summary Future(2020)+Site AM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 23: Ida Ave & Aspen St 01/17/2019 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 +T+ +T+ 4 LTraffic Vol,veh/h 0 4 4 2 3 4 2 18 0 4 25 0 Future Vol,vehlh 0 4 4 2 3 4 2 18 0 4 25 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr_ 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - None Storage Length - - Ueh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 4 4 2 3 4 2 20 0 4 27 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 63 59 27 63 59 20 27 0 0 20 0 0 35 35 - 24 24 - - - - - - - Stage 2 28 24 - 39 35 - - Criticaldwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -_ - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 932 832 1048 932 832 1058 1587 - 1596 - - Stage 1 981 866 - 994 875 - - - - Stage 2 989 875 -_ 976 . 866_ - - - - - - - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 923 829 _1048_ 922_ _829 10581587 _ - 1596 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 923 829 - 922 829 - - - Stage 1 _980 _863 _ _ - _ 993 874 - - Stage 2 980 874 - 964 863 - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 8.9 8.9 0.7 1 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1587 - - 9.26 _941 _1596 - - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.001 - - 0.009 0.01 0.003 - - HCM Control Delay(s)- 7.3 0 - 8.9 8.9 7.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 27: Site Access & Aspen St 01/17/2019 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 5.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations a ;Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 33 5 0 45 8 Future Vol,veh/h 0 33 5 0 45 8 Conflicting Pe_ds,#/hr _0_ 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 Ueh in Median Storage,#_ 0 _- - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 36 5 0 49 9 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 36 0 28 18 Stage 1 - - - - 18 - Stage 2 - - 10 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 6.42 6.22_ Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy 9tg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1-Maneuver - - 1575 - 987 1061_ Stage 1 - - 1005 - Stage 2 - - - -_1013 _ __ - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1575 984 1061 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 984 - Stage 1005 - Stage 2 1010 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 7.3 S 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) -- - 995 - _- - 1575 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay(s) 8.8 _ - _ - 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 - Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Ida Ave & Cottonwood St 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 +T+ 4 4 Sign Control Yield __ Yield _ _ Yield Yield Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 18 0 0 31 2 Future Volume(vph) 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 18 0 0 31 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly flow rate(yph) 0 0_ 3 1_ 3 0 0 27 0 0 46 3, Direction,Lane# EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 -- ---- --- - --- - ------ - - - --- VolumeTotal_(vph) -_ 3 4 27 49 Volume Left(vph) 0 1 0 0 Volume Right(vph) 3 0 0_- -3 Hadj(s) -0.60 0.69 0.12 0.08 Departure Headway_(s) 3.5 4.8 4.1 - 4.0 Degree Utilization,x 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.05 Capacity_(veh/h) 1009 741 866 888 Control Delay(s) 6.5 7.8 7.2 7.3 Approach Deelay_(s) 6.5 7.8 7.2 7.3 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.2 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) - 15 Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 01/17/2019 s __10. - � � � 4\ t ► 1 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations _ _ __�, _ ►� Traffic Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 7 228 62 _ 83 339 9 40 284 167i Future Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 7 _228 62 83 339 9 40 284 167 Initial Q(Qb),veh i_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Ad' 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In _ 1900 1885 1900 1856 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 8 265 72 97 394 10 47 330 194 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 1 0 3 2 2 0 1 1 Cap,veh/h 10 324 88 464 1065 27 574 650 382 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow,veh/h 38 1243 338 870 1815 46 992 1108 652 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 345 0 0 97 0 404 47 0 524 G_rp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1618 0 0 870 0 1861 992 0 1760, Q Serve(g_s),s 13.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 7.8 1.8 0.0 11.9 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 13.7 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 7.8 9.6 0.0 11.9 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.21 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.37 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 422 0 0 464 0 1092 574 0 1033 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.37 0.08 0.00 0.51 Avail Cap(c=a),veh/h 831 0 0 464 0 1092 574 0 1W, HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.7 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 7.4 10.0 0.0 8.3 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 3.0 0.4 0.0 4.4 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.6 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 8.4 10.3 0.0 10.1 LnGrp LOS C A A B A A B A B Approach Vol,veh/h 345 501 571 Approach Delay,s/veh 27.6 9.5 10.1 Approach LOS C A B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 45.2 45.2 23.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *5.2 '5.2 5.2 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s '40 '40 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 19.0 13.9 15.7 Green Ext Time(p=c),s 3.2 4.3 2.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.2 HCM 6th LOS B Notes HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Rouse Ave & Peach St 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR. WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 28 48 71 13 21 107 82 338 17 50 423 55; Future Volume(veh/h) 28 48 71 13 21 107 82 338 17 50 423 55 Initial Q_(Qb),veveh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 1604 1870 1885 1885 1900 1900 1870 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 33 56 83 15 24 124 95 393 20 58 492 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 2 0 20 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 Cap�veh/h 261 214 319 224 214 285 552 969 49 646 852 111 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow,veh/h 1259 1870 1610 1072 1870 1598 1795 1792 91 1781 1634 213, Grp Volume(v),veh/h 33 56 83 15 24 124 95 0 413 58 0 556 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1259 1870 1.610 1072_ 1870_ 1598__ 1795_ 0 1884 1781 0 1847j Q Serve(g_s),s 1.3 1.5 2.4 0.7 0.6 3.8 1.2 0.0 7.1 0.8 0.0 11.3 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 2.0 1.5 2.4 2.2 0.6 3.8 1.2 0.0 7.1 0.8 0.0 11.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 261 214 319 224 214 285 552 0 1019 646 0 963, V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.11 0.43 0.17 0.00 0.41 0.09 0.00 0.58 Avai p(cca),veh/h 691 852 868 590 852 831 598 0 1019 730 0 963 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 22.7 22.2 18.6 23.2 21.8 20.1 5.8 0.0 7.4 5.2 0.0 9.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.0 2.5, Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /wile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.2 0.3 1.4 0.4 0.0 2.6 0.2 0.0 4.4 Unsig.Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 22.9 22.8 19.0 23.3 22.0 21.1 6.0 0.0 8.6 5.3 0.0 113 LnGrp LOS C C B C C C A A A A A B Approach Vol,veh/h 172 163 508 614 Approach Delay,s/veh 21.0 21.4 8.1 10.9 roachL S C C A B Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 8.1 35.1_ - 11.7 9.2 34.0 11.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4.6 5.4 5.4 `4.6 5.4 5.4 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s *6.1 28.5 25.0 *6 28.6 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 2.8 9.1 4.4 3.2 13.3 5.8 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 2.6 0.6- 0.0 3.5 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay- _ 12.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 01/17/2019 -A --. 'e- *-- I--- 4\ t /00. 1. 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations _ #14 _ _ 4+ _ _ 4 +4 Traffic Volume(veh/h) - 47 44 44 12 64 57 26 412 14 _ 36 474 32 Future Volume(vehlh) 47 44 44 12 64 57 �26 412 14 36 474 32 Initial Q(Qb),veh _ 0 0_ 00 0 0 _0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj _ 1.00 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 _1.00 1.00 _1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 01 0 Work Zone On Approach No _ No_ No No Adj SS F,veh/h/In 1900 1 000 1900 1826 1826_ 1826 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885, Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 52 49 49 13 71 63 _29 458 16 40 527 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 0 5 5 _5_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cap,veh/h _ 151 93 76 81 119 97 102 1237 42 113 1119-7 6 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Sat Flow,veh/h 469 691 563 79 881 720 46 1715 58 60 163 05 11 8, Grp Volume(v),vehlh 150 0 0 147 0 0 503 0 0 603 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1723 0 0 1680 0 0 1819_ 0 _ 0 1803 0 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.35 0.33 0.09 0.43 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 320 0 0 297 0 0 1380 0 0 1369 0 Q V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 1224 0 0 1254 0 0 1380 0 0 1369 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 PA Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 22.6 0.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /pile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.7 0.0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A C A A A A A A A A Approach Vol,veh/h 150 147 503 603 Approach Delay,s/veh 23.7 24.0 3.7 4.2 Appro LOS C C A A Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phi;Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.0 11.5 44.0 11.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 7.7 6.3 9.4 6.5 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 4.0 1.0 5.0 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.2 HCM 6th LOS A Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary , 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak Street/Birch Street 01/17/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 41* � T � t r Ira-ffic Volume(vehlh) 138 3 165 1 1 0 253 275 0 0 383 216 Future Volume(veh/h) 138 3 165 1 1 0 253 275 0 0 383 216 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 _0 - 0_- _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj_(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/hlln 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1900 1885 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 152 3 181 1 1 0 278 302 0 0 421 237 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 2 Cap,veh/h 307 4 451 107 86 0 573 1267 0 93 975 819 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.10 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow,veh/h 1175 23 1589 203 469 0 1810 1870 0 1094 1885 1584 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 155 0 181 2 0 0 278 302 0 0 421 237 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1198 0 1589 672 0 0 1810 1870 0 1094 1885 1584 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 10.7 6.6 Cycle QClear c),s 10.3 0.0 7.1 10.3 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 10.7 6.6 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 312 0 451 193 0 0 573 1267 0 93 975 819, V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.29 Avai�l^Cap(cca),veh/h 700 0 880 593 0 0 977 1267 0 93 975 819 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(!) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00, Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 30.0 0.0 22.4 26.3 0.0 0.0 7.4 4.8 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.6 Incr Delay_(d2),s/veh 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 [/oile_BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.7 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 4.6 2.3' Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.2 0.0 23.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 8.1 5.2 0.0 0.0 13.0 11.5 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A A A A A B B Approa_ch Vol,veh/h 336 2 580 658 Approach Delay,s/veh 26.8 26.3 6.6 12.4 Appro LOS C_- C A B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 57.8 19.6 12.4 _ 45.4 19.6 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.4 5.4 *4.6 5.4 5.4 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s _ 40.0 35.0 *25 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 6.8 12.3 7.0 12.7 12.3 Green Ext Time-(p_c),s 2.0 1.4 0.8 3.8 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.4 HCM 6th LOS B Notes *HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St 01/17/2019 -.4 -• 'r '- 4\ t `► ♦ 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4-o4 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 99 688 2 0 658 126 1 0 0 155 0 50 Future Volume(veh/h) 99 _ 688 _ 2 0 _658 126 1 0 0 155 0 50 Initial Q Qb,veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 0 0_ 0 . _ 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00__1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885_ 1900 1900 1900_1900 1900 _ 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 110 764 2 0 731 140 1 0 0 172 0 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.9_0_ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 - 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh,% 1 1 1 __1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap,veh/h _ - _148_ 1097 3 01332 _255 660_ _ 0 0 522 11 149 Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 _0.00 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 Sat Flow,veh/h 208 2451 7 0 3073 570 1391 0 0 1083 25 361 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 382 0 494 0 439 432 1 0 0 228_ 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 952 0 1714 0 1791 - 1758 1391 0 0 1469 0 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 18.2 0.0 18.9 0.0 15.2 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 33.4 0.0 18.9 _ 0.0 15.2 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0 Prop In Lane 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.32 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.25 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h _ 481 0 767 0 801 786 660 0 0 682 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c=a),veh/h 511 0 810 0 846 830 660 0 0 682 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l)_1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.4 0.0 18.2 0.0 17.1 17.1 14.6 0.0 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 8.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0_ 1.3 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),v0/In 8.1 0.0 7.5 0.0 6.2 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.5 0.0 19.8 0.0 17.8 17.8 14.6 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A B A B B B A A B A A Approach Vol,veh/h 876 871 1 228 Approach Delay,s/veh 24.9 17.8 14.6 18.5 Approach LOS _ C B B _ B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 - 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 40.9 43.8 40.9 43.8 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 35.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 2.0 35.4 11.0 17.2 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 _ 2.5 1.4 6.3 _ ^� Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.0 HCM 6th LOS C Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 � i r Queues ' 1: Rouse Ave & Mendenhall St 01/17/2019 4\ T �► 1 Lane Group WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 345 97 404 47 524 u/c Ratio 0.72 0.23 0.37 0.09 0.50 Control Delay 30.8 10.1 9.6 8.3 10.5 Queu lay _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.8 10.1 9.6 8.3 10.5 Queue Length 50th @) _ 124_ 17 __78 __ 8 __ 100 Queue Length 95th(ft) 192 50 162 26 213 Internal Link Dist(ft) 419 417 1833 Turn Bay Length(ft) 50 50 Base Capacity(v_ph) 934 _ 426 1092 534 1048 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback_Cap Reductn 0 0_ 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.23 0.37 0.09 0.50 Intersection Summary Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 2: Rouse Ave & Peach St 01/17/2019 -,* --0. 'r ~ 4\ T Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 33 56 83 15 24 124 95 413 58 556 vlc Ratio 0.14 0.22 0.18 0.08 0.10 0.25 0.15 0.35 0.08 0.48 Control Delay 23.4 24.3 4.9 22.8 22.8 4.7 3.6 9.2 3.3 10.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.4 24.3 4.9 22.8 22.8 4.7 3.6 9.2 3.3 10.6 Queue Length 50th(ft) 10 18 0 _5 7 __ 0 _ _ 8 - 82 5 _ 122 Queue Length 95th(ft) 30 43 21 18 24 26 19 .142 13 206 Internal Link Dist(ft) 422 423 1833 989 Turn Bay Length(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Base Capacity_(vph)_ 816 880 469 680 880 498 622 1177 743 1158 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.06 0.18 0.02 0.03 0.25 0.15 0.35 0.08 0.48 Intersection Summary Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 8: Rouse Ave/Rouse Avenue & Tamarack St 01/17/2019 -• '~ t 1 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 150 147 503 603 u/c R is otis of 0.57 0.47 0.40 0.48 Control Delay 25.4 18.7 5.3 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.4 18.7 5.3 6.1 Que a Length 50th(ft) _ __ _ _36 28 56 73 Queue Length 95th(ft) 84 72 128 167 Internal Link Dist(ft)a 555 547 989 992 Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity(v_ph) 966 1118 1264 1251 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.13 0.40 0.48 intersection Summary JAN 208 ,!J u'D� n n. rL ! E ,�iT� COMMUtiIiY Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 11: Rouse Avenue & Oak Street/Birch Street 01/17/2019 t 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 155 181 2 278 302 421 237 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.27 0.01 0.41 0.23 0.47 0.30 Control Delay 47.4 3.3 29.5 6.9 5.8 19.2 9.7 Queue Delay _0.0 _0.0_ _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.4 3.3 29.5 6.9 5.8 19.2 9.7. Queue Length 50th(ft) 77 0 1 43 49 143 36 Queue Length 95th(ft) . 151 33 7 94 105 296 108 _ Internal Link Dist(ft) 553 170 _ _992 418 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 215 80 Base Capacity(vph) 556 858_ 707 824 1543 895 796 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn- _ 0_ 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.21 0.00 0.34 0.20 0.47 0.30 Intersection Summary Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline rk` Synchro 10 Report 's Page 4 Queues 15: Private Access/Broadway St & Main St 01/17/2019 —► T 1 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 876 871 1 228 u/c Ratio_ _ _ _ 0.90 0.57 0.00 0.37 Control Delay 35.1 18.4 16.0 16.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0_ Total Delay 35.1 18.4 16.0 16.9 Queue Length 50th( ) _ 214 166 0 71 Queue Length 95th(ft) #336 221 4 131 Internal Link Dist(ft)= 300_ _185 _ 172 257_ Turn Bay Length(ft) Base Capacity_(yph) 1079 1678 5_02 610 _ Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 _0 _ 0_ Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 0.52 0.00 0.37 ntersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. 7 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Future(2020)+Site PM Peak Hour 05/07/2018 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 D 0 Fd S133HSMOM 1NV AVM 3Ndl-Mni North Rouse Avenue& East Cottonwood Street& East Aspen Street& East Aspen Street&Front North Ida Avenue& Auxiliary Turn East Peach Street North Ida Avenue North Ida Avenue Street Front Street Lane Warrants AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak NB Right-Turn Yes Yes NO NO NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a Left-Turn NO Yes NO NO n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a SB Right-Turn Yes Yes NO NO n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a Existing(2018) Left-Turn Yes Yes NO NO NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a Volumes EB Right-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a NO NO Left-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a WB Right-Turn n/a n/a NO NO NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a • Left-Turn n/a n/a NO NO NO NO n/a n/a NO NO NB Right-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Left-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a SB Right-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a Future(2020) Left-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Volumes EB Right-Turn n/a n/a NO NO NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a Left-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a WB Right-Turn n/a n/a NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Left-Turn n/a n/a NO NO NO NO n/a n/a n/a n/a Existing Traffic Volumes(2018)-Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on 2-Lane Highways Right-Turn Volume Required Right-Turn Warranted Right- Total DHV During DHV Volume for Turn Lane? Approach Time (veh/hr) (veh/hr,one direction) Warranted Lane (Y/N) Rouse&Peach NB AM weekday 895 17 1 Y PM weekday 1172 10 -36 y Rouse&Peach SB AM weekday 895 52 1 y PM weekday 1172 52 -36 Y Cottonwood&Ida NB AM weekday 29 C 116 N PM weekday 48 C 114 N Cottonwood&Ida 58 AM weekday 29 2 116 N PM weekday 48 2 114 N Cottonwood&Ida EB AM weekday 29 - 116 N PM weekday 48 2 114 N Cottonwood&Ida WB AM weekday 29 C 116 N PM weekday 48 C 114 N Aspen&Ida NB AM weekday 17 C 118 N PM weekday 43 C 114 N Aspen&Ida WB AM weekday 17 G 118 N PM weekday 43 C 114 N Aspen&Front58 AM weekday 2 G 120 N PM weekday 9 G 119 N Ida&Front EB AM weekday 19 30 117 N PM weekday 49 24 113 N • • Future Traffic Volumes(2020)-Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on 2-Lane Highway! Right-Turn Volume Required Right-Turn Warranted Right- Total DHV During DHV Volume for Turn Lane? Approach Time (veh/hr) (veh/hr,one direction) Warranted Lane (Y/N) Cottonwood&Ida NB AM weekday 35 0 115 N PM weekday 53 0 113 N Cottonwood&Ida SB AM weekday 35 2 115 N PM weekday 53 2 113 N Cottonwood&Ida EB AM weekday 35 3 115 N PM weekday 53 2 113 N Cottonwood&Ida WB AM weekday 35 0 115 N PM weekday 53 0 113 N Aspen&Ida EB AM weekday 27 2 116 N PM weekday 55 3 113 N Aspen&Front SB AM weekday 24 11 117 N PM weekday 57 25 112 N Guidelines for Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on 2-Lane Highways (Figure 28.4A) 120 •Future(2020)+Sit •Existing(2018) 100 FVGW TURN LANE MAY BE JUSTIFIED 80 a 0 o � W 3 60 RIGHT TURN LANE MAY NOT BE JUSTIFIED M 40 • 20 0 100 200 300 400 600 600 700 TOTAL DKV VEHICLES PER HOUR.IN ONE DIRECTION f N� NON • • Existing Traffic Volumes(2018)-Left-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on 2-Lane Highways Val=Total left-turn Warranted Left- Va=Total advancing volume in advancing Percent left-turns in Vo=Total opposing Turn Lane? Approach Time traffic volume traffic Va traffic volume (Y/N) Rouse&Peach NB AM weekday 298 31 10.4% 387 N PM weekday 410 78 19.0% 503 Y Rouse&Peach SB AM weekday 387 62 16.0% 298 Y PM weekday 503 48 9.5% 410 Y Cottonwood&Ida NB AM weekday 12 2 16.7% 11 N PM weekday 15 0 0.0% 28 N Cottonwood&Ida 5B AM weekday 11 0 0.0% 12 N PM weekday 28 0 0.0% 15 N Cottonwood&Ida EB AM weekday 5 2 40.0% 1 N PM weekday 2 0 0.0% 3 N Cottonwood&Ida WB AM weekday 1 1 100.0% 5 N PM weekday 3 1 33.3% 2 N AM weekday 10 0 0.0% 7 N Aspen&Ida SB PM weekday 24 0 0.0% 17 N Aspen&Ida WB AM weekday 0 0 MDIV/0! 0 N PM weekday 2 2 100.0% 0 N AM weekday 0 0 NDIV/0! 2 N Aspen&Front NB PM weekday 6 2 33.3% 3 N Ida&Front WB AM weekday 0 0 NDIV/0! 12 N PM weekday 4 0 0.0% 28 N Future Traffic Volumes(2020)-Left-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on 2-Lane Highways Val=Total left-turn Warranted Left- Va=Total advancing volume in advancing Percent left-turns in Vo=Total opposing Turn Lane? Approach Time traffic volume traffic Va traffic volume (Y/N) AM weekday 16 2 12.5% 13 N Cottonwood&Ida NB PM weekday 18 0 0.0% 32 N Cottonwood&Ida SB AM weekday 13 0 0.0% 16 N PM weekday 32 0 0.0% 18 N AM weekday 5 2 40.0% 1 N Cottonwood&Ida EB PM weekday 2 0 0.0% 3 N Cottonwood&Ida WB AM weekday 1 1 100.0% 5 N PM weekday 3 1 33.3% 2 N Aspen&Ida WB AM weekday 13 11 84.6% 4 N PM weekday 29 27 93.1% 6 N Aspen&Front NB AM weekday 2 2 100.0% 13 N PM weekday 8 4 50.0% 28 N 40 mph 800 5�o Left turn treatment 700 should be considered 10% 20% 600 3'0% 0 500 •—E-zisting �---- v • F ture E 400 0 bn 300 N 0 Q OL 0 200 100 Left"turn treatment Jiiiiis.not necessary 0 1 - " -- I I I --- I 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Advancing Volume (Va) . . •uj CL CL 1d3DNOD IDS kWNIWIII�d -----------WAU:AGE-MENU€—�—_ — — — — — — — — — — — ��- } I I I I I I I l o x.0 ofe m . rn r m d9 d9 SIN y to-) --- --- �� -° ----i --- ----- o-------------- -------------- >s I f s I � II I 9 Q 4 I prp Ml A p! 1; gig ' a 39 Q El ��•a PRELIMINARY-FOR REVIEW x eat COTTONWOOD a IDA ONSITE € 8 g e lOT5S78 § sv NOMERPArICA°° ax a SANDERSONo N+ BOZEMAN,KO NA S T E W A R T O OVERAII IMPROVEMENTS PLAN gg Qwww.sondersonstaw°rt.com PARKING STUDY SANDERS&NSTEWART.COM • v 4(' J �34L��aG�4 k. o A S A N D E R S 0 N W STEWART January 18, 2019 Mr. Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager City of Bozeman 20 East Olive Street Bozeman,MT 59771 Reference: Cottonwood&Ida Mixed-Use Development Parking Analysis Project No. 06020.03 Dear Brian: This letter summarizes the findings of a detailed parking analysis that was completed in support of a proposed mixed-use development to be constructed in the northeast side of town, specifically located on a block along the north side of East Cottonwood Street and on the west side of North Ida Avenue in Bozeman,MT. The attached site plan shows the planned location for the development, as well as the locations of parking facilities and site access features for the overall development. The study addresses shared parking allocation for Lots 5-28,Block 105, Northern Pacific Addition. The site will contain a total of 96 on-site:parking spaces in an underground garage, 72 spaces in a leased surface lot (300 feet away from the entrance of Building#1), and 32 on-street spaces after the development. Section 38.540.050 of the Bozeman Unified Development Code (UDC) outlines the number of parking spaces required for residential and non-residential uses.The tables attached to this letter provide a summary of the calculations completed to address the UDC requirements. Table 1 provides a summary of general land use information for each building in the development, code- required parking calculations, and similar calculations based on data from the ITE Parking Generation (4th Edition, 2010)reference manual. The code-required parking demand calculations in Table 1 address the requirements of Section 38.540.050 of the UDC. For residential uses those calculations are based on the number and type of dwelling units, and for commercial uses the calculations are based on 85 percent of the gross floor area (GFA), consistent with Section 38.540.010 of the UDC. Adjustments were made to the code-required parking calculations based on the City's allowable reductions for on-street parking. In total,it was calculated that 260 parking spaces would be required before the on-street parking deduction. Thirty-three (32) on-street spaces are available and with an eight (8) spot reduction for showers/locker rooms the final number of required spaces is 220 based on the UDC requirements. For the ITE Parking Generation-based calculations the number of units and gross floor area were utilized as the independent variables. Land use categories were selected based on the judgement of the author to best represent the residential housing type and the best-known future use of the commercial spaces. A side-by-side comparison of results based on the two calculation methods showed them to be similar. r 'kW To Plan and Design —� ----�-� Enduring Communities... www.sa ndersonstewa rt. com Mr. Brian Krueger January 18, 2019 Page 2 The development is requesting a further reduction in code-required parking. The proposed reduced parking rates would require 160 spaces and include the specific reductions: • Studio/Efficiency Units from 1.25 spaces/unit to 1.0 spaces/unit • 1-Bedroom Units from 1.5 spaces/unit to 1.25 spaces/unit • 2-Bedrrom Units remains at 2.0 spaces/unit • Commercial/Non-residential a 40-percent reduction Table 1 provides a summary of the total number of parking spaces required, but it does not address how the overall demand is affected by the assumed hours of operation for each commercial space or general variations in parking demand throughout the day at a residential location. As shown in Tables 2 and 3, these variations can be estimated by use of the average weekday time-of-day distributions provided in ITE Parking Generation for each land use. Table 2 shows the time-of-day distributions applied to the Code-required parking demand totals for an average weekday. Table 3 shows the time-of-day distributions applied to the proposed reduced Code-required parking demand totals for an average weekday. Table 4 shows the time-of-day distributions applied to the ITE parking demand totals for an average weekday. Based on this analysis, the maximum number of parking spaces needed for the Code-required calculations would be 123 spaces for an average weekday. The maximum number resulting from the proposed reduced Code-required calculations would be 92 spaces for an average weekday. Finally, the maximum number resulting from the ITE calculations would be 125 spaces for an average weekday. Based on this analysis,it is our assessment that the total number of spaces available (200) meets and in fact exceeds the maximum number of parking spaces required on an hourly basis by either the Code-based, proposed code-reduced, or ITE calculation methods. Recommendations provided herein are based on the accuracy of the assumed business hours of operation and provided square footage, as well as the number, type, and occupancy of residential units. Changes or inaccuracies =o any of the provided data may change the analysis and recommendations of this study. Please feel free to call me at 406/922-4306 if you have any questions or would like to discuss these calculations further. Sincerely, Joey Staszcuk,PE, PTOE Project Transportation Engineer JHS Enc. P:06020.03_Cottonwood_Ida_Parking—Letter_011919 ,x Table 1. Parking Demand Summary Code Required Puking Proposed ITE arking Generation # Serving Gross Weekday Residential Total Area or Parking % Puking Floor Weekday Avg Peak Parking Dwelling Commercial Indoor/ 85%of Puking Spaces Puking Reduction Spaces Area Period Puking Spaces Btril Description D-e Type Units SF Hours of Operation Outdoor GFA Rate Required Rate from Code Required ITE Land Use Units (SM Demand Re aired Residential Studio Efficiency Unit 23 n/a 1.25/Unit 28 1.0/Unit 25% 23 Multifamily Housing(Mid-Rise)(221) 23 1.20/Unit 28 1 Residential I-bedroom 23 n/a 1.5/Unit 34 1.25/Unit 17% 28 Multifamily Housing(Mid-Rise)(221) 23 1.20/Unit 28 _ `C_ommereial - Management Offices_ _ 191, 8-_5 klon-Sat Ind— 167 1/250 SP 0 1/350 SP 409% 0 Office Building 01) 196 2.47/1000 SF OI-A 0 Sub-total• 46 1 62 51 46 196 56 ----------------------Y''�---- ` �__... —......... ........_...._.._............ ---------------- -------------------- ..... �.... � ...... 2 _ _Rcsidcntial Studio liffieiene unit 18 _ n/a 1.25/Unit 22 1.0/unit 25% 18 Multifamily Housing(Nlid-Rise 221) 18 1.20/Unit 22 Sub-total, -^—_ �18 _ 22 18 18 22 3 Residential I Bedroom 6-�� n/a 1.5/Unit 9 1.25/Unit 17% 7 Plultifamlly Housing(Plid Rise)(221) 6 1.20/Unit 7 3-Bedroom _-__ l -_ n/a 2.0/12nit 12 2.0/Unit -- 12 Plultifa��How sing(Dlid-Rise)(221) 6 1.20/Unit 7 Sub-total: J T�� 12 21 19 12 14 ----------- ------------------- ------------ ------ ._-___. ........ Residential 1-Bedroom 4 n/a 1.5/Unit 6 1.25/Unit 17% 5 Multifamily Housing(Mid-Rise)(221) 4 1.20/121nit 5 4 Residential 2-Bedroom 12 n/a 2.0/Unit 24 2.0/unit — 24 iMultfamily Housing(Mid-Rise)(221) 12 1.20/Unit 14 _Commercial )ffices 5,207 8-51\lon-Sat Indoor 3.591 I/250SF 14 1/350Sl-. 40% 10 Office Building(701) 5,207 2.47/1000Sl-GI'A 13 Sub-total: - T v� 16 3,591 1 44 39 16 517M32 5 Commercial Restaurant 2,175 II-IOSun-Sat Indoor 1,200 1/50 SP 24 I/90 SF 40% 13 uali Restaurant 931 2,175 I0.60/1000 SIGFA 23 Outdoor 700 1/100SI.- 7 1/I80SF 40% 3 Sub-toml: ��— 1,900 31 16 2175 23 6 Commercial _ Offices 28,681 8-5 Mon-Sat Indoor 20,127 1/250 SI-- 80 1/350 SI- 40% 57 Office Building 201) 28,681 2.47/1000 SI:GI:A 71 L• ��Sub-tota 20127 80 57 28.681 71 Total• 92 36,259 25,785 260 200 92 36,259 —M218 Reduction for Available On-Street Par (1 per 24 LF) 32 32 Reduction for Commercial Bike Rack/Locker Room(101/.) 8 8 djttue Parld Spaces Required =220� A•160� t t Table 2. City Code Parking Demand by Time of Day(Weekday) Average Wee Time of Da Hour Be Business 4 AM 5 AM 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AMI 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PMJ 11 PM 12 PM Residential Percent of Peak Period* 100% 96% 92% 74% 64% - - -- - - - - 44% 59% 69% 66% 75% 77% 92% 94% 100% Parking Demand 103 99 95 76 66 ^- ^- ^- -- -- ^- 45 61 71 68 77 79 95 97 103 Commercial-Office Percent of Peak Period** -- - - 19% 64% 91% 99% 99% 98% 96% 100% 99% 90% 58% - - - Parkin Demand - -- 16 55 78 85 85 84 83 86 85 77 50 Commercial-Restaurant Percent of Peak Period*** - 20% 51% 56% 40% 27% 27% 39% 71% 100% 97% 93% 71% - - Parking Demand - - - 6 16 17 12 8 8 12 22 31 30 29 22 ^- ^- Total Parking Demand: 103 99 95 93 121 78 85 85 84 83 86 85 ■1232 111 71 68 77 79 95 97 103 • "`Used Low/Mid-Rise Apartment(ITE Land Use 221)percentages as distribution data for all Residential units. **Used Office Building(ITE Land Use 701)percentages as distribution data for all office commercial spaces. ***Used Quality Restaurant(ITE Land Use 931)percentages as distribution data for restaurant space. ITE Parking Generation 4th Edition does not provide data for this time period. s Table 3. Proposed Parking Demand by Time of Da (Weekday) Ave a Weekday Time of Da Hour Beginning) Business 4 AM 5 AM 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12PMI 1 PM 2PMI 3PMI 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 PM Residential Percent of Peak Period* 100% 96% 92% 74% 64% ^- -- - - ^- - ^- 44% 59% 69% 66% 75% 77% 92% 94% 100% IParking Demand 85 82 78 63 54 ^- - ^- -- ^- - -- 37 50 59 56 64 65 78 80 85 Commercial-Office Percent of Peak Period** ^- ^- -- 19% 64% 91% 99% 99% 98% 96% 100% 99% 90% 58% jPaxking Demand -- ^- ^- 11 38 54 58 58 58 57 59 58 53 34 Commercial-Restaurant Percent of Peak Period**': -- - - - - - 20% 51 o 56% 40% 27% 27% 39% 71% 100% 97% 93% 71% ^- Parkin Demand ^- ^- ^- ^- ^- 3 8 9 6 4 4 6 11 16 16 15 11 -- -- Total ParkingDemand: 85 82 78 74 M92M 54 58 58 58 57 59 58 91 84 59 56 64 65 78 80 85 T Used Low/bfid-Rise Apartment(ITE Land Use 221)percentages as distribution data for all Residential units. • *"Used Office Building OTE Land Use 701)percentages as distribution data for all office commercial spaces. ***Used Quality Restaurant(ITE Land Use 931)percentages as distribution data for restaurant space. 1TH Parking Generation 4th Edition does not provide data for this time period. • Table 4. ITE Parking Generation Demand by Time of Da (Weekday) Avermage Wee ay Time of Da Hour Be Business 4AMI 5 AM 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM 12 PM Residential Percent of Peak Period'* 100% 96% 92% 74% 64% ^- — — — — — 44% 59% 69% 66% 75% 77% 92% 94% 100% Parkin Demand 111 107 102 82 71 ^- ^- ^- ^- 49 65 77 73 83 85 102 104 111 Commercial-Office PercentofPeak Period— _ 19% 64% 1 91% 99% 99% 98% 96% 100% 99% 90% 58% Parking Demand 16 54 76 83 83 82 81 84 83 76 49 Commercial-Restaurant Percent of Peak Period'*** 20% 51% 56% 40% 27% 27% 39% 71% 100% 97% 93% 71% Parkin Demand — ^- ^- ^- 5 12 13 9 6 6 9 16 23 22 21 16 ^- �-- Total Par Demand: 111 107 102 98 a 17S; 76 83 83 82 81 84 83 124 114 77 73 83 85 102 104 111 • *Used Low/Mid-Rise Apartment(1TE Land Use 221)percentages as distribution data for all Residential units. **Used Office Building(ITE Land Use 701)percentages as distribution data for all office commercial spaces. **Used Quality Restaurant(ITE Land Use 931)percentages as distribution data for restaurant space. ITE Parking Generation 4th Edition does not provide data for this time period. • SECTION 8 APPENDIX F SEWER AND WATER FLOW CAPACITIES COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 8104 SANDERSON %We STEWART April 3, 2018 Project No. 06002.03 WATER AND SEWER PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT FOR COTTONWOOD + IDA MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LOTS 5-28, BLOCK 105, NORTHERN PACIFIC ADDITION, BOZEMAN MT SITE NARRATIVE The following report summarizes the water and sewer design for a mixed-use development located on Lots 5 through 17,Block 105 of the Northern Pacific Addition Subdivision (and portion of vacated alley) in northeast Bozeman, Montana. The project is bound by East Aspen Street to the north,Ida Avenue to the east, East Cottonwood Street to the south and existing commercial parcels to the west that front on North Wallace Avenue. The subject parcel is approximately 2.1 acres of mixed-use consisting of residential apartments,ground floor artisan manufacturing spaces, an office building and renovation of an existing building. Almost all of the development will be built over a new below grade parking garage. WATER Currently the municipal water system adjacent to the site consists of a 6-inch water main in East Cottonwood Street at the south boundary of the site. This main will be replaced with an 8-inch main from the Cottonwood and North Wallace intersection to the East Cottonwood and Ida Avenue intersection. There will also be a new 8-inch water main installed in East Aspen Street from North Wallace to Front Street. There are existing fire hydrants at North Wallace and East Aspen intersection, the North Wallace and East Cottonwood intersection and at the East Cottonwood and Ida intersection. A new hydrant will be set at the East Aspen and Ida intersection giving an east/west spacing of approximately 450 feet and a north/south spacing of approximately 320 feet. The City of Bozeman conducted a fire hydrant flow test at the corner of Ida and Cottonwood on May 12, 2017. The static pressure at the time of the test was 147 psi,with a residual pressure of 110 psi at 1760 gpm. Water for the proposed development will be served by one domestic and one fire service for each of the new individual building. For purposes of sizing the water meter and domestic service, the AWWA M22 fixture unit calculation is used with an assumed pressure of 100 psi. Irrigation flow of 8 gpm is assumed through the service to the existing building at the southwest corner of the site. The total estimated fixture units, peak flow and recommended meter sizes for each building are summarized below: To Plan and Design jo 1__ _..,.­ Enduring Communities... www.sandeoonstewart.com FIXTURE INVENTORY BLDG BUILDING TOILET TOILET RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL KITCHEN SHOWER- NO. 71PE :ANK FLUSH LAVATORY LAVATORY SINK DISHWASHER BATHTUB I Residential 45 45 45 45 45 2 IL-sidential 18 18 18 18 18 3 Residential 12 12 12 12 12 4 ltmdrntial/Comm. 18 2 18 2 18 IS 18 5 Community 2 2 6 Office 16 10 93 20 93 14 93 93 93 TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS BLDG BUILDING TOILET TOILET RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL KITCHEN SHOWER- FIXTURE NO. TYPE TANK FLUSH LAVATORY LAVATORY SINK DISHWASHER BATHTUB UNITS 1 Residential 180 0 67.5 (1 99 90 360 796.5 -2 Residential 72 0 27 0 39.6 36 144 318.E 3 Residential 48 6 I8 0 26.4 24 46 212.4 4 Resdendal/Cann. 72 70 27 3 39.6 36 144 391.6 5 Community _ 0 70 0 3 0 6 Office 0 560 0 13 Il 0 It 575 372 718) 139.3 21 2(W.6 186 74411 RECOMMENDED METER SIZE PEAK MINIMUM SERVICE RECOMMENDED SERVICE BLDG BUILDING FI-KTURE FLOW METER VELOCITY METER VELOCITY NO. 'nTE L\ITS GPM SIZE(IN) rr/SEC SIZE(IN)** FT/SEC 1 Residential 794.5 80 1.3 14.92 1.5 14.52 2 Residential 318.6 51 1 20.83 1.5 9.26 3 Residential 212.4 41 1 16.75 1.5 7.44 ,I RvAcntial/Comm. 391.6 57 1 2328 1.3 I(1.35 Community V 73 70 1.5 12.i1 1.; 12.71 6 Office 375 129 2 13.17 2 13.17 'Includes 81,mai far imgm-on "based on 15 feet Pc strand For water main sizing, the peak hourly flow will be used. The flows are separated to services coming off of the East Cottonwood 8-inch main and the East Aspen 8-inch main. The residential flews are based on the City-of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy; 2.11 people per duelling unit, an average daily usage of 170 gallons per day per person, and a maximum hour to average day ratio of 3:1. The commercial and office flows are more difficult to estimate. Based on the 88 parking spaces for Eie office and artisan manufacturing spaces (prior to reduction),you could assume fcr estimating purposes that each space is an employee. DEQ 4 circular estimates that there is a usage of 13 gallons per day per employee. This peak hourly flow rate to each main are as follows: East Aspen Peak Hourly Domestic Water Demand Average Daily Flow(res) = 63 units x 2.11 persons/unit a 170 gpd/person = 22,598 gal/day Average Daily Flow(comm) = 84 employees x 13 gpd/person = 1,092 gal/day Total Avg Daily Flow = 23,690 gal/day Total A•Jg Daily Flow = 23,690 gal/day / 1440 min/day = 16.5 gal/min Peak:11:)urly Flow Rate = 16.5 gal/min x 3 = 49.5 gal/min Cottonwood Mixed Use V:16020_03_UdLitE,_Design_Re?ort 2 (4/3/18)TRP East Cottonwood Peak Hourly Domestic Water Demand Average Daily Flow(res) = 30 units x 2.11 persons/unit x 170 gpd/person = 10,761 gal/day Average Daily Flow(comm) = 5 employees x 13 gpd/person = 65 gal/day Total Avg Daily Flow = 10,766 gal/day Total Avg Daily Flow = 10,766 gal/day / 1440 min/day = 7.5 gal/min Peak hourly Flow Rate = 7.5 gal/min x 3 = 22.5 gal/min SANITARY SEWER Currently the municipal sanitary sewer system adjacent to the site consists of a 6-inch main in East Cottonwood Street at the south boundary of the site and a 6-inch main in East Aspen Street at the north boundary of the site. Both mains flow to the east. The sanitary sewer in East Cottonwood will be replace with an 8-inch from the manhole at the southwest corner of the site to a point approximately 540 feet to the east where it will tie into an existing manhole at the furthest east end of Cottonwood Street. This existing manhole has a 10-inch main outfall that flows to the north. The sanitary sewer in East Aspen will be replaced with an 8-inch main from the manhole at the northwest corner of the site to a point approximately 480 feet to the east where it will tie into an existing manhole at Front Street. This existing manhole also has a 10-inch main outfall that flows to the north. Sanitary sewer wastewater from each of the proposed buildings will flow to the closest of the new sewer main in either East Cottonwood or East Aspen. The design flow rates calculated below for both the residential and commercial uses to determine the impact to the City of Bozeman municipal sanitary sewer system. The residential flows are based on the City of Bozeman Design Standards using an average daily flow rate of 89 gpd/person using 2.11 persons per unit. The commercial flow rates are calculated the same as they were as describe above in the water section. The flow rates also included is an infiltration rate at 150 gpm/acre infiltration rate. The residential and commercial flows to each of the mains is summarized below: East Aspen Sanitary Sewer Residential Avg Daily Flow = 63 units x 2.11 persons/unit x 89 gpd/person = 11,830 gpd Office Avg Daily Flow = 84 employee x 13 gpd/employee = 1,092 gpd Total Avg Daily Flow (with no infiltration) = 12,922 gpd InfiltrationFlow = 1.05 ac x 150 gpd/ac = 158 gpd Total Avg Daily flow w/ infiltration = 158 gpd + 12,922 gpd = 13,080 gpd Total Avg Daily Flow Rate = 13,080 gpd / 1440 min/day = 9.1 gpm Cottonwood Mixed Use V:16020_03_Udlity_Design_Report 3 (4/3/18)TRP 0 • Peaking Factor = (18+0.133 '-')/ (4+0.133 °5) = 4.21 Peak Hourly Flow Rate = (4.21 x 12,922gpd + 158 gpd)/ 1440min/day) = 37.9 gpm East Cottonwood Sanitary Sewer Residential Avg Daily Flow = 30 units x 2.11 persons/unit x 89 gpd/person = 5,634 gpd Commercial Avg Daily Flow = 5 employee x 13 gpd/employee = 65 gpd Total Avg Daily Flow (with no infiltration) = 5,699 gpd InfiltrationFlow = 1.05 ac x 150 gpd/ac = 158 gpd Total Avg Daily flow w/ infiltration = 158 gpd + 5,699 gpd = 5,857 gpd Total Avg Daily Flow Rate = 5,857 gpd / 1440 min/day = 4.1 gpm Peaking Factor = (18+0.063 1.5)/ (4+0.063 05) = 4.29 Peak Hourly Flow Rate = (4.29 a 5,699gpd + 158 gpd)/ 1440min/day) = 17.1 gpm Sanitaa Sewer Service Line Sizing (maximum flow from building#1 base on 45 units.) Residential Avg Daily Flow = 45 units x 2.11 persons/unit x 89 gpd/person = 8,451 gpd Total Avg Daily Flow Rate = 8,451 gpd / 1440 min/day = 5.9 gpm Peaking Factor = (18+0.095'-')/ (4+0.095 °5) = 4.25 Peak Hourly Flow Rate = 4.25 x 5.9 gal/min = 25.1 gpm The maximum capacity of a 6-inch sanitary sewer service at 2% slope flowing 0.75% full is approximately 287 gpm which is significantly more than the maximum 25.1 gpm flow from the worst case building , therefore, the sanitary sewer services for each building shall be 6- inch. CONCLUSION Upgrading the municipal water system and sanitary sewer system and installing the service sizes as described above is assumed to provide adequate capacity to meet the minimum design standards from the City of Bozeman and the Montana Department of Environmental using the flows rates provided in this report. The new utility improvements and flows will be modeled by the City of Bozeman to confirm the standards are met. Modifications may be required to the assumed utility improvements if said modeling shows any system inadequacies. These changes will be reflected in the final engineering report. Cottonwood Mixed Use V:16020_03_Udbty_Design_Report 4 (4/3/18)TRP SECTION 8 APPENDIX G WELL LOG REPORTS 4 AI COTTONWOOD + IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 bZ� afo� a� bC- ONTANA WELL LOG REPORT Form No.SM R2-99 Well ID# This log reports the activities of a licensed Montana well driller and serves as the offtclal record of work done within the borehole and casing and describes the amount of water encountered. This fom is to be completed by the driller and filed with DNRC within 60 days of completion of the work Acquiring Water Rights Is the well owner's responsibility and Is not accomplished by the filing of this raporL Wall log Information is stored in the Groundwater Information Center at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology(Butte)and water right information Is stored in the Water Rights Bureau records(Helena). For fields that are not applicable,enter NA. Optional Bolds are In italics. Record additional information in the REMARKS section. 1. WELL OWNER: All depth measurements shall be from the top of the we#casing. Name DONNA EDGERLY Time of recovery Is hours/minutes since pumping slopped. Mailing address 306 N.CHURCH Air test' BOZFMAN.IRT WRI IS _20 gpm with driill stem set at 45.,fL for` I tours Time of recovery hrs/min. Recovery water level T It. 2. WELL LOCATION: List%from smallest to largest OR Bailor test' _ SW Y.�E._K Y. Y.,Section 6 gpm with R.of drawdown after hours Township 2S.WS Range County SAr-t ATIN Time of recovery hrahmin. Recovery water level R Lot Tracl0k SubdiWslon Name We/1Address OR Pump WC GPS ClYes O NO Depth pump set for test IL r Latitude Longitude gpm pump rate with—ft.of drawdown after_hm pumping Error as reported by GPS 1wetor(±feet) Time of recovery hrs/min. Recovery water level ft. Hmmlal datum O NAD27 O WGS54 OR Flowing Artesian' 3. PROPOSED USE: M Domestic O Stock I rlaatlan gpm for tours O Public water suoab O Monitodna W ❑Other. Flow controled by •During Me wet feat ft dsdrarge rate shot be es unkbrm as potslbde.This rate may 4. TYPE OF WORK: or may not be ft sustakabb yield of the wM. SustMabb yield does not kmt de the E New WaI O Deeoen exdslina welt 0Abandon eAstlno well reservohof the welt csskv. Method: OCable pRotary O 0ther. 7. WELL LOG: f� 6. WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Depth.Few I Material: Borehole: From To Calmirock and ty aklesaiptor(example:bkrolshaWhwd,or brown Oda. 6 In.from . n ft.to IL pravevvraler,orbroomVur i/heavin Die. in.from (L to R 0 1 TOP SOiL 3 GRAVEL Dia. in.from ft to ti 1 35 SAND 3 GRAVEL Casing: 35 46 CLAY Steel: .250 Wall thickness OThrosded O Welded 46 50 SAND 6 GRAVEL Die. 6 In.from +18' k to 49 R Dia. In.from IL to ft. Plastic: Pressure Rating lbs. OThreaded OWelded Dla. in.from ft.to ft Perforatlons/Slottad Pipe: Type of perforator used Size of perforationsislats fin. no.of perforatlonsislob from ft.to ft no.of perforations/alots from R to ft. Screens: O Yes 10 NO Material Die. Slot size from—ft to ft. Die. Slot size from 11.to fL Gravel Packed: O Yes 13 NO Size of gravel Gravel placed from ft.to ft. Packer. O Yes 13 NO Type Depth(s) Grout: Material used: BENTONITE O ADDRIOXAL SHEETS ATTACHED Depth from fL to fl. OR C Coniinuos Feed a. DATE WELL COMPLETED 1011102 9. REMARKS: 6. WELL TEST DATA: A well teat Is required for all wells.(See detsh on wes bg report cow.) p�,,,�IevN L^ft.below top of casing or 10. OWt.LEWCONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: 13 Close"aftalan oremm psi. All work performed and reported in this well log is in compliance with the How was test flow measured: Montana well construction standards.This report Is true to the best of my b�et/stoowatch.weir,flume,tlowmeter,etc Name,firm,or corporation(print) Yellowstone groundwater cosure area only-Water Temperature OF O AQUIFER TEST DATA FORM ATTACHED Address Test-1 hour minimum Signature Drawdown Is the amount water level Is lowered below stalfc level. Date 10/231D2 Ucenae no. 380 MRMfb TTl a Mnnfmna nmoe,c r► onv •Ir * r joy a r • f L. •► jAV _ . P � lit � N ' " O { �o �.. V. M Groundwater Monitoring Data: Summary of Wells ,Project Name:Cottonwood+Ida Project Number: 18-054 ,5 32 Discovery Drive Location: See Maps Bozeman, MT 59718 ALLIED,Date Installed:4/24/2018 ! ENGINEERING Phone (406) 582-0221 Installed By: AESI 1 SERVIces,�MC. So`° Fax (406) 582-5770 �1eerse vrole��s• NOTES: 1) MW-1 through MW-5 were installed during test pit explorations on 04/24/2018. 2) MW-1 was installed in TP-1,located at SW corner of property. 3) MW-2 was installed in TP-2,located at SE corner of property. 4) MW-3 was installed in TP-3,located near center of property. 5) MW-4 was installed in TP-4,located at NW corner of property. 6) MW-5 was installed in TP-5,located at NE corner of property. 7) Highest water measurement to date in each well: MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 Date Time Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW Depth to GW below EG below EG below EG below EG below EG (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 4/24/2018 NA 9.00 10.00 9.25 9.00 9.33 4/30/2018 8:45 AM 8.03 8.52 7.77 8.46 8.82 5/7/2018 4:45 PM 8.06 8.68 7.90 8.62 9.01 5/15/2018 8:15 AM 7.98 8.65 7.86 8.56 9.05 5/22/2018 8:15 AM 8.17 8.82 8.06 8.78 9.26 5/29/2018 8:00 AM 8.14 8.79 8.03 8.74 9.26 6/5/2018 8:15 AM 8.10 8.72 7.98 8.74 9.23 6/12/2018 8:00 AM 8.45 9.05 8.32 9.07 9.56 6/19/2018 3:15 PM 8.31 8.96 8.21 8.95 9.35 6/26/2018 8:15 AM 8.52 9.08 8.38 9.13 9.59 7/3/2018 3:45 PM 8.50 9.04 8.35 9.10 9.52 7/9/2018 8:00 AM 8.83 9.38 8.68 9.45 9.86 7/16/2018 2:00 PM 9.17 9.69 9.02 9.79 10.18 7/24/2018 11:25 AM 9.54 10.03 9.36 10.06 10.48 7/31/2018 11:30 AM 9.89 10.34 9.67 10.37 10.76 Groundwater Monitoring Data: Page 1 of 1 SECTION 8 APPENDIX H STATE LETTERS IF ANY Jai COTTONWOOD + IOA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 Erik Nelson From: Scott Mueller <SMueller@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 3:08 PM To: Erik Nelson Subject: RE: erik@thinktankarchitects.com Erik, To formalize my comments on the emergency access regarding the Cottonwood and Ida project, I would support the slight relaxation of the required 20 foot wide road rule diminished to 17'6" on a portion of the road. If access is designed with vehicular li dffiL bdi I ierb, those would be operationdl in dII weather conditions by the fire department. We suggest gates. Also the access road would be maintained year-round. • Please contact me if you require further. Thanks Scott Mueller Deputy Fire Chief-Prevention-Fire Marshal Bozeman Fire Department 34 N. Rouse Ave Bozeman, MT. 59771 Office (406) 582-2353 Mobile (406) 589-6271 , smueller@bozeman.net www.bozemanfire.com �f ce���7ce orw/at�wit�,• BOZEMANMT � FIRE DEPARTMENT From: webadmin@bozeman.net<webadmin@bozeman.net> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 10:59 AM To: Scott Mueller<SMueller@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: erik@thinktankarchitects.com i Message submitted from the <City Of Bozeman> website. Site Visitor Name: Erik Nelson Site Visitor Email: erik a,thinktankarchitects.com Scott, We spoke a while back regarding the Cottonwood and Ida mixed use project. Specifically about the width of the fire lane being primarily 20' however at a stretch that has an existing building we would need to diminish it by 2.5' so 17'6" width. As I recall from my notes we reached agreement on this, however i never received a letter as such from you indicating this. We are set to re-submit our application and I am in need of something that best categorizes your thinking on this. Please call me when you can to discuss-406-539-1176 Regards • Erik Nelson - Thinktank Design Group Inc.. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana's Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a "public record" pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City's record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. • 2 Erik Nelson From: Strasheim, Kerri <kstrasheim@mt.gov> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 6:04 PM To: Erik Nelson Cc: Brian Heaston Subject: RE: irrigation well - Cottonwood and Ida Erik - Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the irrigation plans for the 605 E. Cottonwood Project in the City of Bozeman. Groundwater use is specified as lawn and garden irrigation up to 1.25 acre-feet (AF) per year. The rest of the water use will be provided by the City of Bozeman. Since these two lots are becoming one project, the project will fall under the 1987 rule, limiting the entire project to 10 AF of groundwater use. Proposed groundwater use does not exceed 10 AF. No water right permitting is required. Each well used cannot exceed a flow rate of 35 gallons per minute (GPM). Regarding the well log provided, that well log is for the property at 305 N. Church, still owned by the Edgerlys (GWIC ID 199860). I could not find an obvious well log or water right for the property being developed. Standard language: In Clark Fork Coalition, et. al.v. DNRC, et. al., 2016 MT 229, 384 Mont. 503, 380 P.3d 771,the Montana Supreme Court concluded that the definition of"combined appropriation" in Admin. R. Mont. 36.12.101(13)was invalid. The Court reinstated the Department's 1987 Rule defining"combined appropriation" as: "An appropriation of water from the same source aquifer by means of two or more groundwater developments,the purpose of which, in the department's judgment,could have been accomplished by a single appropriation. Groundwater developments need not be physically connected nor have a common distribution system to be considered a "combined appropriation." They can be separate developed springs or wells to separate parts of a project or development. Such wells and springs need not be developed simultaneously. They can be developed gradually or in increments. The amount of water appropriated from the entire project or development from these groundwater developments in the same source aquifer is the "combined appropriation." Under this Rule,the Department interprets subdivisions that are pending before the Department of Environmental Quality for approval on October 17, 2014 or filed after that date to be a single project that can be accomplished by a single appropriation. Consequently, all wells in such a subdivision will be considered a "combined appropriation"for the purposes of Mont. Code Ann. 85-2-306. The only exception to this interpretation is that a subdivision which has received preliminary plat approval prior to October 17, 2014 will not be considered a project under the "combined appropriation" 1987 Rule; individual lots will still be evaluated under the 1987 Rule at the time of an application to the Department. 2015 Mont. Laws§ 1, Ch. 221. This communication does not serve as a pre-approval for a water right. Thank you, Kerri Kerri Strasheim i Regional Manager - Gallatin, Madison, and Park Counties MT DNRC Water Resources 2273 Boot Hill Court, Suite 110 Bozeman, MT 59715 Ph: 406-556-4504 Fax: 406-587-9726 kstrasheim@mt.gov From: Erik Nelson <erik@thinktankarchitects.com> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 10:25 AM To: Strasheim, Kerri <kstrasheim@mt.gov> Subject: irrigation well-Cottonwood and Ida Greetings Kerri, I spoke with one of your team members the other day regarding an existing well on a city lot in Bozeman that we would like to use for our projects domestic irrigation needs.They recommended that I send you an email with the information —however upon reading the inquiry instruction it appears that I will also need to send a copy via mail to your office. Could you please take a look at the outline of information below and provide some advice—to move forward on. Per the inquiry— The location of the project is in the City of Bozeman 605 E Cottonwood—see attached existing conditions site map Attached is the existing well log data from the well located on site that we intend to use for landscape irrigation.The copy I have has the well log ID#cut out hoping you can track it. The project is a mixed use project offering commercial space (30,000 sf) and residential units (90 with 20%affordable) on roughly 2 acres. We intend to landscape above a podium over a parking garage as well on the remaining openspaces. Attached are the landscape plans for the project with building footprints as well as landscape materials and planting strategies provided by the landscape architect. The flow rate required for the project provided by the landscape architect is: •Estimated Flow Rate: 64.5 AF @ 60 PSI static pressure •Purpose: Lawn &Garden •Estimated volume: 0.5 acres of planting area = 1.25 AF/season (Per form 615 from Montana DNRC) We would like to include your approval for the use of the well in our submittals to the City-please advise on the steps needed and any additional information you may require to complete this. Thanks for your time. Regards, Erik t. 2 0 0 PARKLAND DEDICATION MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development- DRC FROM: Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Review Committee CC: Mitch Overton—Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: 1/31/18 SUBJECT: Recommendations for Application No. 17547—Cottonwood & Ida Concept PUD MEETING DATE: 1/18/18 In attendance: Chair Richard Shanahan, Beth Thorsen, Salal Huber-McGee, Katie Walsh Staff present: Carolyn Poissant, Trails Open Space and Parks Design and Dev. Manager(Parks) Proposal Review Comments: • The applicant's proposal for cash in lieu is for cash in lieu of parkland (CILP) dedication for 0.73 acres. At the most recently received appraised value ($1.36), the CILP amount is $42,654. • Recommendation: approval Meeting motion: Moved by Walsh, seconded by Huber-McGee, / hereby move to recommend city commission approve the Cash in lieu of parkland dedication proposal submitted for Application No. 17547— Cottonwood & Idea Concept PUD in the a m o u n t of approxim ately $42,654, subject to approved appraisal. The com mittee would also like to acknowledge that thi3 area of downtown is park poor and recommend additional amenities be included in the development that will make it more publicly inviting. Further, we recommend that Commission explore acquiring additional parkland in this area. Approved 3-0. Note. this recommendation is from the Subdivision Review committee and was not reviewed by the full RPAB. COTTOC:I 000 ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II OCTOBER 2018 page 59 UNfFEDSTATES POSTAL SERVICE 2201 Baxter Lane Bozeman, MT 59718-9998 1-800-275-8777 or 1-406-586-1508 January 15, 2019 Erik Nelson Think Tank Design Group, Inc. 33 North Black Ave. Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: N. Cottonwood St. and N. Ida Ave Project Erik, The Postmaster for Bozeman agrees with your decision for locations of Cluster Box Units and Outside Parcel Lockers for the project. The first location outside and in front of building 6. Second location outside between buildings 2 and 3 near the north end of building 3. Third location outside next to building 4 on the east side of the building. Respectfully, Mike Novotny Maintenance USPS Bozeman MT • • SECTION 8 APPENDIX I MAILING LIST OF ADJOINERS C®TTIOM OOD ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL 11 11 JANUARY 2019 p it COTTONWOOD & IDA PUD - NOTICING DATE: October 17, 2018 l 1 r „k �♦ � ", F7� �Zr t ` . 1__ i• �' �,�•,� �" � a t� �' 4 el, 4L ak i ti 1 e• � 1. � �� �4 �` {' I'aw #Am I i lT MAILING LIST MAP Page 1 T H I N KTA N K D E S I G N th N.BLACK AVE BO.com lnfo@thinktankarchitects.com 5tan 406.587.3628 itects.com • thinktankarchitects.c� info@thinktankarchitects.com ri t Contact Information Property Address: Property Address: 516 E Tamarack St Bozeman, MT 59715 701 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: EMERALD TAMARACK LLC Owner: MADISON MARLYN SUE,HEDGLIN VALERIE 1627 W MAIN ST#248 ANN,PETERSEN DIANA LEE,DOWNING TRACEY LYNN BOZEMAN,MT 59715-4011 220 SACAJAWEA PEAK DR BOZEMAN,MT 59718-9392 Property Address: 716 N Church St Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: EMERALD TAMARACK LLC 707 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 1627 W MAIN ST#248 Owner: WIESE DWIGHT R&JEANNE WESLEY BOZEMAN,MT 59715-4011 707 N WALLACE AVE BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3063 Property Address: 704 N Church St Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: DOEHRING DANIEL J&ANNA 719 N Wallace Ave& Lot 2A, PLAT C-23-A32 704 N CHURCH AVE (behind) Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3054 Owner: OASIS PROPERTIES LLC LEHRKIND MANSION BED&BREAKFAST Property Address: 719 N WALLACE AVE 509 E Cottonwood St Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3063 Owner: MADISON MARLYN SUE,HEDGLIN VALERIE ANN,PETERSEN DIANA LEE,DOWNING TRACEY LYNN Property Address: 220 SACAJAWEA PEAK DR 801 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59718-9392 Owner: SCALA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1137 Property Address: TRUSSVILLE,AL 35173-6100 513 E Cottonwood St Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: BARBER STEVE Property Address: 513 E COTTONWOOD ST 803 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3059 Owner: SCALA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1137 Property Address: TRUSSVILLE,AL 35173-6100 517 E Cottonwood St Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: HERLANT ELLEN A Property Address: 517 E COTTONWOOD ST Non provided on Cadastral BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3059 Legal Description:MINOR SUB 3, S06, T02 S, R06 E, Lot 3, NOR PAC ADD BOZ AMND PLAT C-23-A 18 Owner: SCALA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1137 Page 12 N.BLACK AVE BOZEMAN S 4 .THINKTANKDESIGN thinktankarchitects.com info@thinktankarchitects.com [j td TRUSSVILLE,AL 35173-6100 Property Address: 522 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: OSTERHOLM ERIK&WATERS SHANNON Non provided on Cadastral 522 E COTTONWOOD ST Legal Description:MINOR SUB 3, S06, T02 S, BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3060 R06 E, Lot 2, NOR PAC BOZ AMND PLAT C-23-A18 Property Address: Owner: SCALA PROPERTIES LLC 526 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 PO BOX 1137 Owner: HANSEN DAVID&LEANNE TRUSTEES TRUSSVILLE,AL 35173-6100 526 E COTTONWOOD ST BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3060 Property Address: 502 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: BRYAN VAN K&WALLIS MORGER 530 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 21 W BABCOCK ST Owner: HERR STEVE&JEAN BOZEMAN,MT 59715-4662 530 E COTTONWOOD ST BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3060 Property Address: 506 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: WOOD EDWARD A&SHANA D 611 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 506 E COTTONWOOD Owner: HUSTON STEVE BOZEMAN,MT 59715 3551 CURTIS LN MANHATTAN,MT 59741-8263 Property Address: 510 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: DOYLE MARK 605 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 510 E COTTONWOOD ST Owner: GROTH FLORENCE J BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3060 3300 E GRAF ST UNIT 24 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-7185 Property Address: 514 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: NELSON PETER M&REGAN M 501 E Peach St Bozeman, MT 59715 514 E COTTONWOOD ST Owners: TRADES GUILD CONDO OWNERS BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3060 ASSOCIATION 501 E PEACH ST UNIT D Property Address: BOZEMAN,MT,59717 518 E Cottonwood St Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: DOMENECH JOSE M&ELIZABETH A Unit 1&A 518 E COTTONWOOD ST MT HOP DOGS LLC BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3060 527 N Montana Ave Bozeman,MT,59715 Page 3 N.BLACK AVE BOZEMAN A Stank 406.587.3628THINKTANKDESIGN thinktankarchitects.com lnfo@thinktankarchitects.com F:jFtl Unit 4 Property Address: DAVIS JACK 629 E Peach St Bozeman, MT 59715 PO BOX 5077 Owner: 600 NORTH WALLACE AVENUE LLC BOZEMAN,MT 59717-5077 217 INTERNATIONAL CIRCLE HUNT VALLEY,MD 21030-1332 Unit 5,Unit D,Unit E XREA LLC Property Address: 817 S 3RD AVE 621 E Peach St Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT,59715 Owner: GILLAM CON K REVOCABLE TRUST &GILLAM DAPHNE REVOC TRUST Unit 6,7&Unit F PO BOX 937 JACKSON JOEL DEAN&JACKSON DEBBIE J BOZEMAN,MT 59771-0937 501 EAST PEACH SUITE F BOZEMAN,MT 59715 Property Address: 627 E Peach St Bozeman, MT 59715 Unit 12 Owner: MEDIA STATION INC DAVIS JACK M&SUSAN K 627 E PEACH ST PO BOX 5077BOZEMAN,MT 59717-5077 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3033 Unit B Property Address: RADIANT ENGINEERING INC 630 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 501 E PEACH STREET,SUITE B Owner: RCAR LLC BOZEMAN,MT 59715 PO BOX 161297 BIG SKY,MT 59716-1297 Unit G MANGAS REGAN L Property Address: 5321 E GALLATIN RD 626 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BELGRADE,MT 59714-8527 Owners: MILL STREET LOFT CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION,INC. Unit H c/o Leah Belair,Registered Agent EYORE LCC 626 E.COTTONWOOD AVE PO BOX 6114 BOZEMAN,MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59771-6114 Loft#1 Property Address: JOSEPH PFANKUCH 600 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 626 E COTTONWOOD RD UNIT 1 .1 `, Owner: 600 NORTH WALLACE AVENUE LLC BOZEMAN MT 59715 JAN 28 LU iJ i ! c/o BUNTING MANAGEMENT V'-- % 217 INTERNATIONAL CIRCLE Loft#2 1-Cj0W-11jNllY HUNT VALLEY,MD 21030-1332 LOFT DREAMS LLC 9999 BRIDGER CANYON RD BOZEMAN,MT 59715-8606 Page 14 T H I N KTA N K D E S I G N 33 N.BLACK AVE BOZEMAN MONTANA 59715 406.587.3628 thin ktankarchitects.com info@thinktankarchitects.com PALO ALTO,CA 94303-0995 Loft#3 626 COTTONWOOD LLC Property Address: 19 HOFFMAN DR 615 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN MT 59715 Owner: BANGTAIL PARTNERS LLC PO BOX 10195 Property Address: PALO ALTO,CA 94303-0995 620 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: BLOCK 106 PARTNERS INC Property Address: 618 N WALLACE AVE 529 N Ida Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3042 Owner: SPEAKMAN MIKE 526 N 9TH AVE Property Address: BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3332 618 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: POMEGRANATE LLC Property Address: 3919 RAIN ROPER DR 820 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-0632 Owner: WALLACE NORTH LLC 810 N WALLACE AVE UNIT B Property Address: BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3020 624 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: WACKAMOLEY LLC Property Address: 3919 RAIN ROPER DR 802 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-0632 Owner: WALLACE NORTH LLC 810 N WALLACE AVE UNIT B Property Address: BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3020 601 Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: THOMPSON SAMUEL S III&BEAM TRUSTEE, Property Address: THOMPSON NATHANIEL L,THOMPSON SAMUEL S IV Non provided on Cadastral 712 E ASPEN ST Legal Description:NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3002 S06, T02 S, R06 E, BLOCK 104, Lot 7— 16 Owner: REISTAD CORY S 3919 RAIN ROPER DR Property Address: BOZEMAN,MT 59715-0632 724 N Wallace Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: NORTH WALLACE DESIGN GUILD LLC Property Address: 724 N WALLACE AVE STE 2 N Ida Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3095 Legal Description: NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, S06, T02 S, R06 E, BLOCK 101, Lot 1 —3 Property Address: Owner: GIOVANINI TERRY LEE 720 N Ida Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 720 N IDA AVE Owner: BANGTAIL PARTNERS LLC BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3022 PO BOX 10195 Page 15 33 N.BLACK AVE BOZEMAN MONTANA 59715 406.587.3628 T H I N K TA N K ® E S I G N• thinktankarchitects.com Info@thinktankarchitects.com I it Property Address: 705 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: BIG DOG REAL ESTATE LLC 725 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 8S CANVAS CT COS Owner: 777 LLC BOZEMAN BOZEMAN,MT 59715-0675 PO BOX 13 BOZEMAN,MT 59771-0013 Property Address: 707 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Property Address: Owner: MATHEWS GREGORY Non provided on Cadastral 3261 HARRISON ST Legal Description:NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94110-5212 S06, T02 S, R06 E, BLOCK 101, TRACT 1 PLAT C-23-A27 BEING PART OF LOTS 9, 10 & E17' Property Address: LOT 11 &VAC ST 713 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: SCHLEGEL MICHAEL J Owner: MAGUIRE JOSEPH G 4 CANDLELIGHT DR 713 E COTTONWOOD ST BOZEMAN,MT 59718-7213 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3013 Property Address: Property Address: 720 FRONT ST Bozeman, MT 59715 717 E Cottonwood Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Legal Description: NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, Owner: THOMPSON SAMUEL S&BEAM D S06, T02 S, R06 E, BLOCK 101, TRACT 5 PT 712 E ASPEN ST LOT 9,10& PT E 17' LOT 11 BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3002 Owner: PAVLIC ROBERT&VANDEGRIFT DARVIN 720 FRONT ST Property Address: BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3067 712 E Aspen St Bozeman, MT 59715 Owner: THOMPSON SAMUEL S III&BEAM TRUSTEE, Property Address: THOMPSON NATHANIEL L,THOMPSON SAMUEL S IV Non provided on Cadastral 712 E ASPEN ST Legal Description: NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3002 S06, T02 S, R06 E, BLOCK 102, Lot 1 -3, PLAT C-23 Property Address: Owner: CITY OF BOZEMAN 710 E Aspen St Bozeman, MT 59715 PO BOX 1230 Owner: FISH VICKI BOZEMAN,MT 59771-1230 710 E ASPEN ST BOZEMAN,MT 59715-3002 Property Address: Non provided on Cadastral Property Address: Legal Description: NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, 707 E Peach St Bozeman, MT 59715 S06, T02 S, R06 E, BLOCK 101, Lot 12— 13 Owner: BRONKEN Owner: CITY OF BOZEMAN PO BOX 188 PO BOX 1230 BOZEMAN,MT 59771-01880 BOZEMAN,MT 59771-1230 Pagel 6 T H I N KTA N K D E S I G N th N.BLACK AVE BOZEMAN lnfo@t i Stan 4 itects. 628 com thinktankarchitects.com info@thinktankarchitects.com [Jit Property Address: Property Address: Non provided on Cadastral Non provided on Cadastral Legal Description:NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, Legal Description: NORTHERN PACIFIC ADD, S06, T02 S, R06 E, PT LOT 8 TR A S06, T02 S, R06 E, ACRES 0.28508, TRACT Owner: CITY OF BOZEMAN LYING ADJ BLOCKS 101 & 104, LEASE PO BOX 1230 #500499 BOZEMAN,MT 59771-1230 Owner: MONTANA RAIL LINK INC,PROPERTY MANAGEMENT MRL &TREASURE STATE OIL COMPANY PO BOX 16624 MISSOULA,MT 59808-6624 Page 7 T H I N K TA N K E S I G N 33 N.BLACK AVE BOZEMAN MONTANA 59715 406.587.3628 thinktankarchitects.c0 info@thinktankarchitects.com • • SECTION 8 APPENDIX J PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL 11 11 JANUARY 2019 � 0Z E MAH MT Community Development FROM: DEVLOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: COTTONWOOD AND IDA CONCEPT PUD,APPLICATION 17547 DATE: JANUARY 5, 2018 Project Description: Concept Planned Unit Development (CPUD) application for a multi building mixed use development. Project Location: 615 E. Cottonwood/702 N. Ida Recommendation: Not applicable to a CPUD application. Code provisions must be satisfied with submittal of a formal application. All references are to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC), primarily Chapter 38. PLANNING COMMENTS Planning Division, Brian Krueger, bkrueger0bozeman.net,406-582-2259 Code Provisions 1. The applicant shall submit with the next, formal application for Preliminary PUD Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how they have responded to each of these comments. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 2. The PUD must conform to the requirements of the Unified Development Code criteria. A PUD is a discretionary approval and the review authority must find that the overall development is superior to that offered by the basic existing zoning standards. See Section 38.20.030.A.4, BMC. The obligation to show a superior outcome is the responsibility of the applicant as conveyed by the PUD design guidelines. 3. What is the proposed future underlying legal lot configuration proposed? Individual lots? One large lot? Condominium? 4. How do you proposed to phase the project with a parking structure underlying the entire project site? 5. A site plan is required following PUD approval for each building. In the case of the entire lot being occupied by a parking structure, it complicates the entitlement and TDD: 406-582-2301 • THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Page 2 of 7 COX � `..V� � n� MT Community Development process for a project that would be constructed and occupied over time. We would have to discuss the proposed phasing more before giving definitive direction on site plan entitlement for construction. 6. How do you propose to provide private residential open space for the multi-household residential uses on site per Section 38.27.020.E? Public access open space plazas cannot be counted towards the private residential open space requirements for the residential units. 7. The minimum required front yard setback staff would support on this project is ten feet via a relaxation. A ten foot utility easement is required on all street frontages per Section 38.23.060. 8. Staircases and other architectural elements may not encroach on the 10' front yard utility easement per NorthWestern Energy comments. 9. The proposed apartment and apartment building uses must be identified as such and not as an accessory residential use to M-1 uses. The apartments and apartment buildings may be requested as a proposed use via a relaxation through the PUD. See Section 38.14.020.B.2.b. The code refers to uses approved as part of a PUD as conditional uses. The apartment use is requested as a conditional use/requested via a relaxation through the PUD. 10.The maximum lot coverage in the HMU district may not exceed 40 percent for principally residential use project. This project is a principally residential use project. If the project exceeds 40% lot coverage a relaxation is required to be requested. 11.The proposed relaxation to utilize another zones parking table and have it apply to this zone is not allowable by code. Unlike land uses, the code does not allow cross zone utilization of standards. For the purposed of this PUD individual parking relaxations must be requested for individual uses from table 38.25.040-3. E.g. If a 30% reduction is requested for office uses, request a 30% reduction in the required parking for office. Anticipate future nonresidential uses and propose reductions accordingly. List the relaxations individually, by use in the preliminary PUD. 12. Section 38.23.120 requires a location for mail delivery. The USPS will require multiple cluster box units for a project of this size. A street frontage location will be required with a loading zone. A location for this must be coordinated with the USPS prior to preliminary PUD submittal. 13. Consider providing significant secure covered bike parking. 14. Consider utilizing a greywater or roof drain water capture system for landscape irrigation. TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Page 3 of 7 nO)aOZENAHMT Community Development 15. No on street parking may be eligible to be counted on North Ida Avenue as the right of way is substandard at 45' in width. A final determination on this issue may be made following confirmation of the final design of the full section of North Ida Avenue. The right of way may not be large enough to accommodate drive lanes, pedestrian facilities and on street parking on both sides of the street. 16. Provide draft development design guidelines with the preliminary PUD if phasing is proposed. 17.The proposed design guidelines shall include a section which clearly indicates portions that rely upon approval of the PUD, and identify a summary of items associated with relaxations and PUD performance. The City of Bozeman will rely upon the overall design standards required as part of the planned unit development application. The design standards may not be altered without consent of the City. 18.The preliminary plan submittal shall identify the uses to be allowed in the nonresidential spaces,both as proposed and for potential future allowed uses. Parking must be analyzed based upon those uses. 19. Provide an exhibit with the preliminary PUD that demonstrates the connectivity between each building and the proposed open spaces. There needs to be a system of hard surfaces and ADA accessibility between each building and the open spaces. The open spaces must be clearly delineated with the limits of each area, dimensions, and whether they are proposed as private or public access. PUD open spaces must meet a minimum of 23 landscape performance points.A PUD open space landscape plan is required with the preliminary application. 20.The parking requires commensurate provision of ADA parking stalls. Design of such stalls in the proposed parking structure does not appear to meet current building code. Please consult with the Building Division to establish requirements for meeting accessible space minimums for the project on the whole. For example, the residential portion of the parking garage must also include ADA parking stalls for the residential uses. 21.A notice prepared by the City shall be filed concurrently with the PUD so that it will appear on title reports. It shall read substantially as follows: Lots within the Cottonwood and Ida PUD are subject to specific design standards and restrictions on use. These standards may be found in [insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to Cottonwood and Ida PUD and are in place of the general development standards of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Cottonwood and Ida PUD approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Cottonwood and Ida Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot TDD: 406-582-2301 0 0 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Page 4 of 7 • • MT Community Development owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process.Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. 22. Formal applications for preliminary plan must be submitted within one calendar year of the date of the comment letter. Advisory Comments 1. Next steps for the subject application review: • Design Review Board (DRB) consideration of the CPUD per Sec.38.19.040. on January 10, 2018 • Recreation and Parks Advisory Board consideration of the proposed cash in lieu of parkland January 18, 2018. 2. Next steps following completion of this application review, including opportunities highlighted for recommended concurrent review include: • Complete lot line adjustment (once all parcels are under one ownership) to aggregated all parcels into one lot. • Prepare and submit a PPUD application that clearly outlines all relaxation requests, provides draft guidelines and PUD performance point provisions, and incorporates modifications responsive to CPUD feedback, among other PPUD criteria. • Prepare and submit a FPUD with site plan review with CCOA. May request concurrent construction for infrastructure improvements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Engineering Division, Shawn Kohtz, P.E., skohtzC@bozeman.net.406-582-2288 1. The applicant must provide an estimate of sanitary sewer peak-hour flows from the proposed project, so the City Engineering Division can verify downstream sewer capacity for the proposed project. 2. The applicant must provide a traffic impact study with the preliminary PUD application. 3. The applicant must construct E.Aspen Street to a complete City local street standard between N.Wallace Avenue and Ida Avenue. 4. The applicant must construct Ida Avenue to a complete City local street standard between E. Aspen Street and E. Cottonwood Street. Additionally, the City's TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Page 5 of 7 O- �7 L� Il"IJIr� H MT Community Development Transportation Master Plan indicates a requirement for a bike boulevard in Ida Avenue, which must be incorporated in the street design. 5. The property owners' association will be required to maintain the proposed on-street, angled parking along E. Cottonwood Street including snow plowing and maintenance of the parking surfaces. 6. The applicant must clarify public infrastructure completion in the phasing plan. 7. The 6-inch clay sanitary sewer mains in E. Aspen Street and E. Cottonwood Street are insufficient to accommodate sanitary sewer flows from the proposed project. The applicant must upgrade the 6-inch sanitary sewer mains to a minimum 8-inch PVC main from the manholes near the west property boundary to the locations on E.Aspen Street and E. Cottonwood Street where the existing sewer mains increase to 10-inch mains near Front Street. 8. The applicant proposed townhomes along Ida Avenue. However, there is not currently a sanitary sewer main in Ida Avenue. The applicant proposed a single, sanitary sewer service to connect the townhome complex on Ida Avenue to the sanitary sewer main in E. Cottonwood Street. Building code does not allow this configuration for townhome units. If the applicant keeps the townhome units in the design,the applicant must construct a sanitary sewer main in Ida Avenue from the southern edge of the townhomes and connect that main to the existing sanitary sewer main in E. Aspen Street. Subsequently, the applicant must construct individual sanitary sewer services to each townhome unit. A single sanitary sewer service may be constructed to serve an apartment complex or a condo complex, but building code does not allow a single sewer service to serve a townhome complex. 9. Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) Section 38.23.030.A states: The developer shall install complete drainage facilities in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city, and shall conform to any applicable facilities plan and the terms of any approved site specific stormwater control plan. The city's requirements are contained in the design standards and specifications policy and the city modifications to state public works standard specifications. 10.The applicant must define snow storage for snow plowed from the fire access lane and the accesses to the courtyard. The fire access lane and the courtyard area must be maintained to allow emergency responders to access these areas year-round. The property owner's association will be required to provide the necessary maintenance. P.O.20 East Olive Street :. Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 406-582-2260 TDD: 406-582-2301 • • THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE, Page 6 of 7 • • 051 Z E lvL/�M MT Community Development 11.The applicant must develop solid waste collection locations and coordinate those plans with the Solid Waste Superintendent (Kevin Handelin). 12.The applicant must abandon any existing, unused water services at the main per City Water and Sewer Division requirements. 13.The applicant must abandon any existing, unused sanitary sewer services per City Water and Sewer Division requirements. 14.The applicant must update the existing water meter installation upon renovation of the existing building. The applicant must contact the City Backflow Prevention Specialist (Jubal Whitlock) in the City Water and Sewer Division to inspect the existing water meter installation and provide guidance to upgrade the installation. 15.The applicant is advised that a grease interceptor, conforming to the latest adopted edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code must be installed with any development responsible for food preparation. 16.The applicant must contact the City Engineering Division (Brian Heaston) for an analysis of cash-in-lieu (CIL) of water rights and pay any CIL of water rights due prior to site plan approval. 17.The applicant must analyze vision triangles through the project to ensure pedestrian, bike, and vehicular safety. 18.The applicant must construct a City standard street light at the intersection of E.Aspen Street and Ida Avenue. ADDITIONAL DIVISION COMMENTS Building Division; Bob Risk brisk@bozeman.net 406-582-2377 1. Building permit applications and plans for review are now submitted to the Building Division electronically. To be sure that your plans are corrected formatted and organized, please review the submittal information on our website, http:/Zwww.bozeman.net/Departments/Fire/Building/Apply-for-Building-Permit or contact our Permit Coordinator Ashley Koenig at 406-582-2371) for more information. 2. Handicap accessible parking required for all uses.An accessible path to an accessible building entrance from all the parking areas must be provided. 3. Accessible pathways between all buildings is required. Fire Department; Jack Coburn icoburn@bozenian.net 406-582-2386 1. The Fire Department needs access to the exterior of all buildings within the complex, i.e. be able to fight fire from all sides of all buildings. 2. The Fire Department needs access to the Fire Department Connections for all fire sprinklers and standpipes for the S-2 parking garage and all buildings. 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 TDD: 406-582-2301 THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Page 7 of 7 Mo [E % Z o M G=�1 H M T Community Development 3. There must be a fire hydrant within 100 feet of any dry standpipe connection. Water Conservation; Jessica Ahlstrom jahlstrom@bozeman.net 406-582-2265 Stormwater Division; Kyle Mehrens jkmehrens@bozeman.net 406-582-2270 Water and Sewer Division; John Alston jalston@bozeman.net 406-582-3200 Forestry Division;Alex Nordquest; anordquest@bozeman.net 406-582-3205 1. Coordinate with the Forestry Division on tree pit design and tree species selection for street trees. Special species selection is required for planting under power lines. 2. Provide sleeves/conduit for irrigation lines for all tree pits. NorthWestern Energy; Cammy Dooley; cammy.dooley@northwestern.com 3. Overhead power lines may require additional building setback in order to provide clearances. 4. A ten foot front yard utility easement is required on all street frontages. No stairway encroachments will be permitted. Parks and Recreation; Carolyn Poissant; cpoissant@bozeman.net 406-582-2908 Sustainability Division; Natalie Meyer nmeyer@bozeman.net 406-582-2317 Solid Waste Division; Kevin Handelin khandelin@bozeman.net 406-582-3238 1. A solid waste &recycling plan needs to be provided. Future Impact Fees: Please note that future building permit applications will require payment of the required transportation, water, sewer and fire impact fees according to the City of Bozeman adopted impact fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance. If you desire an estimate of the required impact fees according to current rates please contact the Department of Community Development and/or visit www.bozeman.net. 20 East OLive Street © ' 0 TDD: 406-582-2301 • • THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Page 1 of 12 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept Planned Unit Development Staff Report Date: Design Review Board, January 10, 2018 Project Description: A concept planned unit development for a multi-building, mixed use development. Project Location: The site is located at 615 E. Cottonwood Street/702 N. Ida Avenue. The legal description is Lots 5-28 plus vacated alley, Northern Pacific Addition, Section 6 Township 2S, Range 6E, PMM City of Bozeman, MT. The lots combined contain a total of 2.04 acres. The project is zoned HMU, Historic Mixed Use District. The project does not lie within an Overlay District. Recommendation: Provide comments on concept PUD Report Date: January 4, 2018 Staff Contact: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Executive Summary The planned unit development (PUD) concept review is a pre-application review and discussion with the City's Development Review Committee (DRC), Design Review Board (DRB), other applicable advisory boards and the planning staff of the applicant's proposal and any requirements, standards or policies that may apply. This step represents an opportunity to identify any major problems that may exist and identify solutions to those problems before formal application. The property owner/applicant has made a PUD concept plan application for the construction of a mixed use development on 2 acres bound by a future extension of Aspen Street, Ida Avenue and East Cottonwood Street. The site is presently partially developed with older light industrial buildings. The PUD concept plan is for the development of a single phase project to construct an underground parking structure on the majority of the property, with five buildings placed on top of the parking podium and with one existing building to be renovated as a community center/commons building. The uses are proposed as a mix of residential (72%), office (22%), artisan manufacturing (4%), and the community building (2%). This application is reviewed against the Unified Development Code plan review criteria that apply to all site plan applications, conditional use permit criteria and the criteria of the PUD chapter specific to the proposed nature of the PUD. If relaxations to the zoning standards are requested with the PUD the review authority must find that the 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 2 of 12 deviation will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced by the existing standards of this chapter, and which will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this article, with the adopted goals of the city growth policy and with any relevant adopted design objectives plan. The Design Objectives Plan for the Entryway Corridors 2005 is the relevant adopted design objectives plan at this time. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and provided comments on the application (attached). The Design Review Board will consider the application on January 10, 2018. The Board is required to provide a comments and recommendations to the applicant as to whether the concept plan meets the City's requirements, standards and policies. TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES ...........................................................:........................................ 3 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION/DEVIATIONS /VARIANCES.................... 5 SECTION 3 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS......................................................... 6 APPENDIX A—PUD INTENT STATEMENTS .................................................................. 10 APPENDIX B - PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY ............................... 11 APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................ 12 ATTACHMENTS................................................................................................................... 12 • • 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 3 of 12 SECTION 1 -MAP SERIES i�}Y LUMBER ——r'��''� DISTRIBUTOR " s HISTORIC TRAIN DEPOTi 7.71 . Jt NORTHERN - _ PACIFIC o FORMER ` ' `'� - RAILWAY TECH BREWERY ~` OFFICES SITE OFHCt & -" INDUSTRIAL - STUDIOS �; -- - °�� POCKET' PARK t=-r_._ E.ASPEN ST- w ; .. ARTISAN BED& MFR. %BREAKFAST haw s .�'f✓ .- .. r�4: yr' ;�. 'Y ' J �. j' ARTISAN SINGLE-FAMILY S� r `. SINGLE-FAMILY!f - MFR,` RESIDENCES W. MILL �' RESIDENCES E.COTTONWOOD Sl _ -- SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ��> CAFE - 6 MULTI-FAMILY w +) I RESIDENTIAL r,w fzz F -BEER&WINE~~ - .DISTRIBUTOR %= OFFICES& BIKE " : OFFICES& STUDIOS SHOP +' !f BAKERY STUDIOS '4 E.PEACH ST. TO - ' SINGLE-FAMILY j ( DOWNTOWN •` RESIDENCES, t �' r µ ti NORTH\ i COMMERCIAL { h .y• BUS DEPOT 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 4 of 12 PROPOSED USES A VAR*MENT Bl _01NG 8 TCa,NHOLSE-STYLE APAOTMENT; f C SROuN7 P'J0R ,RT SAM NIANUFA:[JRItJG SPACES .. 0 :?ENDATEJ E<IS 14 EJILING Y l E PALIC OPEN SPAC E F 7E Ct BYWING ` r o � • • 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 5 of 12 EAST ASPEN STREET @174T�ING xIm APARTMENT II fB�tIL6�FiG r ROOF DECK W y I.. 7 a ����',• •i SPAR Ef1i,. I � O - O 2 ` 2 EAST COTTONWOOD STREET SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION I DEVIATIONS/ VARIANCES a. Apartment building use in HMU. This is a proposed new conditional use in the HMU district. b. Reduction to front yard setbacks from 20' to10'. c. Increase in allowable building height from 45' top 48'. d. Reduced parking ratio for the residential uses: studio and efficiency units from 1.25 spaces per unit to one space per unit and a reduction in the ratio for one bedroom units from 1.5 to 1.25 spaces per unit. e. Reduced parking rations for nonresidential uses: reduction of 20% for office uses and 30% reduction for artisan manufacturing and other commercial uses. 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 6 of 12 SECTION 3 -STAFF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The purpose of the Concept PUD is for discussion of the applicant's proposal with the designated review committees in order to identify any requirements and applicable standards and policies, as well as offering the applicant the opportunity to identify major problems that may exist and identify solutions prior to making formal application. Staff has evaluated the project and offers the following comments and questions for the DRB's consideration. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy The project site has a future land use designation of industrial and a zoning designation of NEHMU, Northeast Historic Mixed Use. This project proposes apartment buildings within the NEHMU. While residential uses are allowed in HMU, they are only allowed as accessory to another industrial principal use and configured as no more that 50% of the gross area of a building.This project proposes apartment buildings. 93 dwelling units are proposed. A PUD relaxation is required in order to grant the apartment building use. The industrial land use designation description in the growth policy states "This classification provides areas for the uses which support an urban environment such as manufacturing, warehousing, and transportation hubs. Development within these areas is intensive and is connected to significant transportation corridors. In order to protect the economic base and necessary services represented by industrial uses, uses which would be detrimentally impacted by industrial activities are discouraged. Although use in these areas is intensive, these areas are part of the larger community and shall meet basic standards for landscaping and other site design issues and be integrated with the larger community. In some circumstances, uses other than those typically considered industrial have been historically present in areas which were given an industrial designation in this growth policy. Careful consideration must be given to public policies to allow these mixed uses to coexist in harmony." If the PUD project were approved and constructed, how would this alter the NEHMU district?Would future industrial uses ever locate in the vicinity of this project?Will a significant increase in residential units create future conflicts between the current industrial uses? It is arguable that the district changes substantially if this project is constructed with a stronger likelihood that more residential projects would follow and with an increase of conflicts between residential uses and industrial uses. The NEHMU zoning intent states "The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both nonresidential and residential uses." Is this project a creative integration of land uses or an inappropriate addition of new apartment building uses that were not • • 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 7 of 12 anticipated in this district? Will the unique qualities and nature of the area be detrimentally impacted by the new apartment building uses? The following goals and objectives from the Bozeman Community Plan are included for discussion: Goal LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City, efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work,and minimizes sprawl. The historic northeast mixed use district neighborhood has a distinct sense of place. Does this project contribute to the existing and expanding sense of place in this neighborhood? This is a developing urban center and this project would allow people to live in close proximity to work, public and private basic services and minimizes sprawl. Objective LU-1.4: Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design. This project is infill development and is the redevelopment of an underutilized site that provides additional density of housing and new office space.The NEHMU district has not historically included significant amounts of office space or apartment buildings. Traditionally offices were only included in buildings as accessory to other light industrial uses.These buildings propose residential and office uses at a density not seen previously in the district. Does this larger scale respect the context of the existing development which surrounds it? Will the new uses respect the context of the existing development around it? Goal LU-2: Designate centers for commercial development rather than corridors to encourage cohesive neighborhood development in conjunction with non- motorized transportation options. The project is not along a corridor. This project provides additional housing density and allows residents to access services and recreation with non motorized transportation options. Objective LU-2.3: Encourage redevelopment and intensification, especially with mixed uses, of brownfields and underutilized property within the City consistent with the City's adopted standards. This project includes mixed uses and is proposed on underutilized property. Objective C-1.3: Support compatible infill within the existing area of the City rather than developing land requiring expansion of the City's area. 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 8 of 12 This project is compatible with the B-3 zoning district, the downtown neighborhood and is an infill project within the City. Objective C-5.2 Encourage the inclusion of plazas and other urban design features as public areas within developments. This project includes a public access plaza open space and integrates urban design features into the public areas. Objective H 1.1 - Encourage and support the creation of a broad range of housing types in proximity to services and transportation options. This project provides new apartment housing options for singles or couples that do not exist in the NEHMU.The location is in proximity to services and transportation options. Objective H2.2 -Support infill development and the preservation of existing affordable housing and encourage the inclusion of additional affordable housing in new infill developments. This project proposes long term restricted affordable housing within an infill development. In staffs review, the single largest policy discussion regarding this PUD is around the proposed character and the intensity of uses proposed within a relatively small area in the NEHMU that has not been seen historically or anticipated through the current zoning district regulations. Performance Points:With a PUD, Section 38.20.090.E.2.a.7 requires at least 20 performance points for the subject property. Points can be met using any combination of on-site and off-site open space or other options listed in the code. The Preliminary PUD must specify how the performance points are being met.The concept plan provides an inventory and small discussion of how the PUD performance requirements are to be met onsite. The proposal is to utilize a variety of options to satisfy the PUD performance requirement. Development Guidelines: With a PUD, Section 38.20.070.D.2 BMC requires development guidelines for all phased PUD's. This project is proposed as one phase, as such development guidelines are not required, but each building will be required to be submitted with full design and site plan level materials with the preliminary PUD or subsequent with the final PUD plan review in order that building permits for all portions of the development can be issued simultaneously. The alternative is to submit a phasing plan and development guidelines. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation: The pedestrian circulation system is a strong element of the design. A hierarchy of types of circulation is provided and connections are available both in the north/south and east/west orientations. Bicycle racks are • • 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 9 of 12 required and should covered, numbered and placed near key building entrances or open spaces. Automobile Connections: A two vehicular connections are provided from the primary adjacent streets. Two accesses are proposed from East Aspen Street. One access is proposed to the parking structure, with a second designated fire access along the west property boundary. The DRC discussed the need to provide a stronger secondary surface access to accommodate fire apparatus and sanitation trucks. The fire department noted a need to have better access into the plaza space in order to access the upper floors of the building during a fire event. The parking areas are entirely subgrade. While the code requires a minimum site size of 30 acres in order to institute a wayfinding district, smaller wayfinding signage is recommended for development of this size. Innovative Stormwater: The concept plan proposes performance points for low impact development stormwater design that localizes the treatment and conveyance of stormwater. This type of design is highly supported by staff. Opportunities exist to collect roof water underground for surface landscape irrigation. Landscaping: At the concept level,the application does not delineate in detail the amount of landscape features that are intended. Overall, the landscape plan should provide at least 23 performance points for landscape open space areas. The concept plans shows a mixture of trees, turf, plaza landscaping areas. No surface stormwater areas are shown. Common site furniture and outdoor plaza design should exhibit commonalities of theme and design. Public art is recommended in all plaza areas and near building entrances. Lighting: As with landscape features and site furniture, lighting of open space and major entrances into the development and individual buildings should implement a common theme that supports the concept of this mixed use PUD. A hierarchy of lighting types are recommended to direct pedestrians in the evening hours. A security lighting plan should be developed to provide an adequate level of light after business hours without lighting the entire development. LED lighting is highly recommended in all areas. Signage: Because this project contains multiple tenants,the Preliminary PUD should include a comprehensive signage plan which is required by code. Signs should be an integral part of the overall architectural design and should be part of the Development Guidelines. A common signage program that specifies location, size, lighting, materials, and unified graphic design for both shared and individual signs should be developed. This project is proposed on a singular lot, the code allows a maximum of 250 for the project. 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 10 of 12 Public Areas and Plazas: Consideration should be given to identifying a general theme for the central public outdoor plaza area(s) with landscape furniture, landscape features, public art, and lighting.While the proposed open space plaza in the center of the development is proposed as public it is unlikely to be used as such as designed. A larger street presence for the plaza or other strategies to open it up to the public street spaces in order for the plaza to be utilized as public access performance points. Consideration should be given to shade structures/ elements within the outdoor areas. Landscape features, outdoor furniture, lighting, seating areas, and outdoor vendor areas should also be integral elements of these areas. Building Design:. While a single project the initial building designs read as if the project may have developed organically with each building.This is desirable in this location as the neighborhood context is a diverse mixture of building sizes/types and styles. The initial sketches demonstrate high quality design. The larger outstanding question is whether the dense intensity of uses is in conflict with the environment anticipated in the NEHMU zoning. The NEHMU district was adopted to reflect an existing local community character and did not anticipate a development of this intensity and size. Service and Utility areas: The proposal does not provide adequate circulation for deliveries, trash service, and outdoor storage. Depending on the overall mix of uses that develop within the project, demands for services may vary substantially. Some manufacturers and offices have a much higher demand for deliveries and services than other low intensity uses. Thought should be given to a flexible approach to trash enclosures and loading/delivery areas to service the development. Currently the proposal does not address this element in a way that would satisfy the criteria for the project. APPENDIX A - PUD INTENT STATEMENTS Sec. 38.20.010. Intent. A. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development (PUD) concept, to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically,with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and general welfare, it shall be the intent of this chapter to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: 1. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with the city's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies; • • 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 11 of 12 2. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the city area; 3. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities; 4. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks; S.To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage, water quality and reduction of flood damage; 6.To encourage patterns of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation, thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; 7.To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation; 8.To reduce energy consumption and demand; 9. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography; 10. To improve the design, quality and character of new development; 11. To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas; 12. To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of incompatible developments; 13. To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer,the neighborhood and the community as a whole; 14. To promote the efficient use of land resources, full use of urban services, mixed uses, transportation options, and detailed and human-scale design; and 15. To meet the purposes established in section 38.01.040 BMC (Intent of the Unified Development Code). APPENDIX B- PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Classification The subject property is zoned "NEHMU" (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District). The intent of the northeast historic mixed-use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for 17547 Cottonwood and Ida Concept PUD Staff Report Page 12 of 12 creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by- case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both nonresidential and residential uses. Standards for buffering between different land uses are deliberately not as high as standards elsewhere in the community as it is assumed that persons choosing to locate in this area are aware of the variety of possible adjacent land uses and have accepted such possibilities as both acceptable and desirable. It is expected that the lots within this district will continue to develop under a variety of uses which may increase or decrease in scope in any given portion of the district. The clear intent of this district is to support a mix and variety of nonresidential and residential uses. Adopted Growth Policy Designation The property is designated as "Industrial" in the Bozeman Community Plan. This classification provides areas for the uses which support an urban environment such as manufacturing, warehousing, and transportation hubs. Development within these areas is intensive and is connected to significant transportation corridors. In order to protect the economic base and necessary services represented by industrial uses, uses which would be detrimentally impacted by industrial activities are discouraged.Although use in these areas is intensive, these areas are part of the larger community and shall meet basic standards for landscaping and other site design issues and be integrated with the larger community. In some circumstances, uses other than those typically considered industrial have been historically present in areas which were given an industrial designation in this growth policy. Careful consideration must be given to public policies to allow these mixed uses to coexist in harmony. APPENDIX C- OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Bangtail Partners LLC PO Box 10195 Palo Alto CA 94303 Applicant: Imperial Development LLC 33 N. Black Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Representative: Thinktank Design Group Inc. 33 N. Black Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Report By: Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager ATTACHMENTS PUD Concept Plan Development Review Committee Memorandum January 5, 2018 The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. t SECTION 8 APPENDIX K LEED DOCUMENTS JA N r8t r � dlJ COMM OFJ•�J! ur!yL) '-LUPMENT COTTOMWOOD ¢ 10A RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II 11 JANUARY 2019 LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development Plan Report prepared by Kath Williams, LEED Fellow January 15, 2019 Plans for Sustainable Neighborhoods can now be,registered and certified under current LEED version 4. This replaces the older Neig.tiborhood Development program where there was an option for "precertification. Cottonwood & Ida LEED-ND version 4 Project # TEMPND090 December 24, 2018 (confirmation attached) Registration for LEED v4 ND Plan is available for neighborhood-scale projects in any phase of planning and design with no more than 75% of the project's total floor area constructed. The Version 4 adaptation helps sustainable neighborhood projects market and find support for the project among prospective tenants, financiers, and public officials by affirming the project's intended sustainability strategies. Once the project is fully entitled, the project will submit complete documentation to Green Business Certification Institute (GBCI) for third- party review. After the conventional LEED response to review comment period, the project will pursue recognition as a LEED certified Plan. Once the project is built, the project may pursue certification "as built." Attached is the current LEED-ND scorecard which will grow and be adapted based on upcoming decisions and changes to the Cottonwood & Ida Plan. LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development Plan Project Name: Cottonwood+ Ida Project Checklist Date: 1/16/2019 Yes ? No Yes ? No 10 0 181 Smart Location&Linkage 28 8 8_1 151 Green Infrastructure&Buildings 31 Y Prereq Smart Location Required Y Prereq Certified Green Building Required Y Prereq Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities Required Y Prereq Minimum Building Energy Performance Required Y Prereq Welland and Water Body Conservation Required Y Prereq Indoor Water Use Reduction Required Y Prereq Agricultural Land Conservation Required Y Prereq Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Required Y Prereq Floodplain Avoidance Required 5 Credit Certified Green Buildings 5 5 5 Credit Preferred Locations 10 2 Credit Optimize Building Energy Performance 2 2 Credit Brownfield Remediation 2 1 Credit Indoor Water Use Reduction 1 7 Credit Access to Quality Transit 7 2 Credit Outdoor Water Use Reduction 2 • 2 Credit Bicycle Facilities 2 1 Credit Building Reuse 1 3 Credit Housing and Jobs Proximity 3 2 Credit Historic Resource Preservation and Adaptive Reuse 2 1 Credit Steep Slope Protection 1 1 Credit Minimized Site Disturbance 1 1 Credit Site Design for Habitat or Welland and Water Body Conservation 1 4 Credit Rainwater Management 4 1 Credit Restoration of Habitat or Wetlands and Water Bodies 1 1 Credit Heat Island Reduction 1 1 Credit Long-Term Conservation Management of Habitat or Wetlands and Water 1 1 Credit Solar Orientation 1 Bodies 3 Credit Renewable Energy Production 3 201 4 1171 Neighborhood Pattern&Design 41 2 Credit District Healing and Cooling 2 Y Prereq Walkable Streets Required 2 Credit Infrastructure Energy Efficiency 1 Y Prereq Compact Development Required 1 Credit Wastewater Management 2 Y Prereq Connected and Open Community Required 1 Credit Recycled and Reused Infrastructure 1 2 4 3 Credit Walkable Streets 9 1 Credit Solid Waste Management 1 4 2 Credit Compact Development 6 1 Credit Light Pollution Reduction 1 2 2 Credit Mixed-Use Neighborhoods 4 5 2 Credit Housing Types and Affordability 7 0 5 l 1 1 Innovation&Design Process 6� 1 Credit Reduced Parking Footprint 1 5 Credit Innovation 5 2 Credit Connected and Open Community 2 1 Credit LEED°Accredited Professional 1 • 1 Credit Transit Facilities 1 1 ^1 Credit Transportation Demand Management 2 3 1 0 Regional Priority Credits 4 ---- ------ 1 Credit Access to Civic&Public Space 1 1 Credit Regional Priority Credit:Region Defined 1 1 Credit Access to Recreation Facilities 1 1 credit Regional Priority Credit:Region Defined 1 1 Credit Visitability,and Universal Design 1 1 Credit Regional Priority Credit:Region Defined 1 2 Credit Community Outreach and Involvement 2 1 Credit Regional Priority Credit:Region Defined 1 1 Credit Local Food Production 1 2 Credit Tree-Lined and Shaded Streetscapes 2 41 18 51 PROJECT T• 1 1 Credit Neighborhood Schools 1 Certified: 40-49 points, Silver: 50-59 points, Gold: 60-79 points. Platinum: 80+points SECTION 8 APPENDIX L CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS COTTONWOOD ¢ IDA RESPONSE& RESUBMITAL II II JANUARY 2019 • Return Recorded Document to: Bangtail Partners,LLC P.O.Box 10195 Palo Alto, CA 94303 DECLARATION FOR THE IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM THIS DECLARATION is hereby made and entered into this day of , 2019, by BANGTAIL PARTNERS, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, of P.O. Box 10195, Palo Alto, Ca 94303, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant", whereby the real property hereinafter described are submitted to the provisions of Chapter 23,Title 70,MCA, also known as the"Unit Ownership Act" as a condominium. The property subject to this Declaration shall be known as the IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. The address of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM is Bozeman, Montana, 59715. NOW, THEREFORE,the Declarant hereby declares that the property subject to this Declaration shall be.held, conveyed,mortgaged, encumbered, leastd,rented,used, occupied, sold and improved subject to the Declaration's, limitations, covenants,conditions,restrictions and easements contained in this Declaration, all of which are imposed as equitable servitudes pursuant to a general plan for the development for the purpose of enhancing and protecting the value and attractiveness of the property, and every part of it in accordance with the plan for the improvement of the property and its division into condominiums. All of the limitations, covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements shall constitute covenants that run with the land and are binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, Declarant, the Association and all parties having, or acquiring any right,title or interest in or to any part of the property. This Condominium Declaration is established in accordance with the Montana Unit Ownership Act. The Condominium development shall contain individual units for commercial use, as set forth herein and in the Bylaws, each unit owner shall have an exclusive right to his/her/its unit and shall have an undivided and inseparable right with other unit owners in the common elements as set forth herein. Page 1 of 40 I. DEFINITIONS Unless expressly provided otherwise,the following definitions shall pertain throughout this Declaration and in the interpretation thereof: 1. Association or Association of Unit Owners.shall mean all of the Unit Owners acting as a group and in accordance with duly adopted Bylaws and this Declaration. 2. Board or Board of Directors shall mean the Board of Directors of the Association as more particularly defined in the Bylaws. 3. Building or Buildings shall mean the single unit buildings comprising a part of the property,which may be further subdivided or subjected to further and additional condominium regimes to include additional units as set forth further in this Declaration. 4. Bylaws shall mean the Bylaws promulgated by the Association under this Declaration and the Unit Ownership Act. 5. Common Elements shall mean both General Common Elements and Limited Common Elements. a. General Common Elements include all those elements which are for the use of all Unit Owners, business invitees, and guests of Unit Owners of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. Specifically included are: The foundations, columns, girders, beams, supports, exterior walls, roofs, entrances, and exits of the Buildings; grounds surrounding the buildings, (except those grounds appurtenant to or directly in front of a Unit which shall be limited common elements and further described on Exhibit B), driveways,the land on which the buildings are located,paths,sidewalks and walkways,.storm water facilities, including but not limited to retention ponds and , parking. areas not specifically allocated to a particular Unit, (but not including the parking areas within the Parking Garage Unit which are a limited common element as described below), any irrigation system placed on the property for landscape,maintenance of trees and vegetation, any portions of the Buildings designated on the floor plans as common to all Units. All utilities including electrical (power), gas, heating, telephone, hot and cold water and sewer lines (waste disposal), refrigeration and air conditioning that serve all of the Units, landscaping, plants and other materials and improvements separate from and outside of the Building containing the Unit, and other common facilities in which all of the Unit Owners own an allocated interest therein and in general all Page 2 of 40 apparatus and installations existing for common use; all structures, Common Elements and improvements for amenities, maintenance, storage and other uses which are owned by the Association or for the use of all of the owners, and other elements necessary for the safety, maintenance and existence of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM in which each Unit Owner shall have his designated percentage of interest, as set forth in Section IV below. All exterior windows and monument signage for the Buildings shall be considered General Common Elements. The General Common Elements are further depicted on Exhibit B. b. Limited Common Elements as used in this Declaration shall mean those Common Elements which are reserved for the use of Unit Owners or any subset thereof, or their business invitees, and guests, to the exclusion of other Unit Owners of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM, or their business invitees, and guests. As to any given Unit Owner(s), Limited Common Elements shall mean the Common Elements which are located within or axed to the Building containing the Unit in which the elements are located or situated on the Condominium's real property. Specifically included are: . (i) flues, chimneys, ducts, cables, conduits, public utility lines, water, sewer, electrical, gas, cable television lines, hot and cold water pipes (all such utility pipes and lines that service less than all Units,including connections of all types needed to link General Common Elements to Limited Common Elements, are Limited Common Elements; whereas those serving all Units shall be General Common Elements), balconies,entrances, stoops,furnaces,patios, decks,boilers, hot water tanks, and fixtures, or other portions of the Building servicing only a particular Unit or less than all of the Units. The proportional percentage interest of the Units in the Limited Common Elements shall be computed by determining the number of Units that have use of the Limited Common Elements and taking the percentage of interest of each such Unit and dividing it by the total percentages of interest of the Unit(s) making use of the particular Limited Common Element. The Limited Common Elements are further depicted on Exhibit B; (ii) the first five(5)feet,located directly around each building as shown on Exhibit B; (iii) The Parking Garage and its elevator shall be a Limited Common Element to Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and Unit 6 shall not use the Parking Garage; (iv) The leased parking area (as depicted on Exhibit C) shall be a Limited Common Element for Unit 6 only; Page 3 of 40 (v) The garbage compactor and recycling area in Unit 1 shall be a Limited Common. Element shared with Unit 2; The garbage compactor and recycling area in Unit 4 shall be a Limited Common Element with Unit 3; (vi) The bike turning area, mailroom, rooftop and entryway of Building 1 and walkway/bridge between Units 1 and 2 shall be a Limited Common Element to Units 1 and 2. 6. Common expenses shall mean expenses of administration, maintenance, repair or replacement of General Common Elements, expenses agreed upon as common by the Association of all Unit Owners, and expenses declared common by the Unit Ownership Act. 7. Declaration shall mean this document and all parts attached thereto or incorporated by reference, and subsequent amendments thereto. 8. Declarant means BANGTAIL PARTNERS, LLC,the initial owner of the Property and the entity that subjected the Property to the Unit Ownership Act. 9. Limited Expenses shall mean the expense attributable to the maintenance, repair and replacement of Limited Common Elements, and are expenses only for owners of Units within the respective Building for which the expenses are accrued. 10. Manager shall mean the Manager, the: Board of Directors, management, corporation, or any other person or group of per retained or appointed by the Association of Unit Owners for the purpose of conducting the day-to-day operations of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. 11. PropeM shall mean the land, buildings, improvements and structures thereon, and all easements, rights and appurtenances belonging thereto, which are herewith submitted to the provisions of the Unit Ownership Act. 12. Recording Officer shall mean the county officer charged with the duty of filing and recording deeds, mortgages and all other instruments or documents relating to this Declaration and the Property which is its subject. 13. Sub Units shall mean each Unit may be further subjected to additional condominium regimes and may contain condominium Units of additional condominium regimes. These additional condominium regime Units shall be referred to as "sub-units" and those sub-units shall not be considered Units in IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUMS,but rather shall be a part or portion of an IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUMS Unit. 14. Unit shall be the separate Condominium,Units of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM and is a parcel of real property intended for any type of independent use, and with a direct exit to a public street or highway or to a common area, limited .1„ Page 4 of 40 common area, or areas leading to a public street or highway; at present, each Building on the Property constitutes one Unit. 15. Unit Desi ation shall mean the combination of letters, numbers, or words which identifies each designated Unit separately. 16. Unit Owner or Owner(s) shall mean the person or persons owning a fee simple absolute,or one who is a co-owner in any real estate tenancy relationship that is recognized under the laws of the State of Montana, in one or more Units of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. 17. Voting Interest shall mean the vote of the Unit Owners based on their respective percentile interest of ownership of the common elements as set forth in Section IV unless otherwise set forth herein. II. REAL ESTATE Description The Property which is by this Declaration submitted and subject to the Montana Unit Ownership Act is described in Exhibit"A"attached thereto. The Condominium shall consist of six (6) separate Units designated as Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Each Unit is currently its own Building. The Declarant reserves the right to create Sub-Units in the future should Declarant so choose by subjecting a Unit to an additional Condominium regime. The common element includes an Underground Parking Garage and a Leased Parking Area. The provisions of this Declaration and the Bylaws shall be construed to be covenants running with the land, and shall include every Unit and shall be binding upon all Unit Owners,their heirs, successors,personal representatives and assigns for as long as this IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM Declaration and Bylaws are in effect. Condominium Units Each Unit, together with the appurtenant undivided interest in the Common Elements of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM shall together comprise one Condominium Unit, shall be inseparable, and may be conveyed, leased, rented, devised or encumbered as a Condominium Unit. The Units comprising the Condominium shall be located in six (6) separate Buildings with each Building being its own separate Unit. Any balcony or deck which is accessible from,associated with or joins a Unit shall, without further reference hereto be a Limited Common Element to that Unit. Page 5 of 40 Encroachments If any portion of the General Common Elements or Limited Common Elements encroaches upon a Unit or Units, a valid easement for the encroachment and for the maintenance of the same, so long as it stands, shall'and does exist. If any portion of Unit encroaches upon the General Common Elements,'or Limited Common Elements, or upon an adjoining Unit or Units, a valid easement for the encroachment and for the maintenance of the same, so long as it stands, shall and does exist. Such encroachments and easements shall not be considered or determined to be encumbrances either on the General Common Elements, Limited Common Elements, or on the Units for the purpose of marketability of title. During the construction of the Building(s) any encroachment easement over the Common Elements is reserved and granted unto the Declarant, its contractors, agents, employees, successors and assigns and utility companies for movement and temporary storage of equipment,machinery, construction materials and parking for workers. Parkin Areas There are three (3) separate types of Parking Areas: i (i) Underground Parking Garage. The underground parking garage is located under Units 1, 2 and 6 and shall be a Limited Common Element for Units 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Unit 6 shall not use the Underground Parking Garage, and shall rather use street parking areas or the Leased Parking.Area(as defined below). The rules and regulations for the use of the Underground Parking Garage shall be established by Units 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. The Underground Parking Garage is further depicted on-Exhibit D. (ii) Leased Parking Area. The Leased Parking Area is located at and is further depicted on Exhibit C,and shall be for the exclusive use of Unit 6 and shall be a Limited Common Element of Unit 6. Unit 6 shall establish the rules and regulations regarding the use of the Leased Parking Area. (iii) Street Parking and other unassigned Parking Areas. Any Unit Owner may park on the adjoining streets in accordance with all parking regulations established by the City of Bozeman. Creation of Sub-Units While there will initially be six(6)Units comprising the IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM each Unit shall itself be made'up of several Sub-Units, which will be submitted to their own additional condominium regime within the Unit. Any such subsequent Sub-Unit created will be encumbered with the terms, conditions, restrictions Page 6 of 40 and provisions contained and set forth in this Declaration and these Bylaws and shall for all intent and purposes hereunder be considered a part of the Unit. Declaration and Bylaws for any additional condominium regime shall not conflict with this Declaration or the Bylaws for IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. In event of a conflict, this document shall govern. All Owners and purchasers, their heirs, successors, assigns and mortgagees consent that the Units may be further subject to additional condominium regimes and divided into Sub-Units as set further above by the Owners of such Units,their successors or assigns. In this regard, all Owners,purchasers, their heirs, successors, assigns and mortgagees of any Unit or interest in and to the condominiums created hereunder agree to and do hereby appoint said Owners of such Units or that Owner's successor, assign or designee as having a power of attorney to effectuate the creation of such'Sub-Units in so far as may be required to amend this Declaration and agree to the Amendment of this Declaration as may be needed to reflect changes in the site plan and floor plans of a Unit upon the creation of an additional condominium regime within that Unit and the resulting Sub-Units. Any change made to the right and ability of a Unit Owner to subject their Unit to additional condominium regimes and create Sub-Units as set forth above must receive 100% approval vote from all the Unit Owners. Unit Boundaries Each Unit shall include the entire Building constructed on that portion of the Property depicted as such Unit as shown on the Site Plan, including any exterior walls of such Building and anything attached thereto. III. EASEMENT, COMMON ELEMENT—INTERIOR REMODELING Common Element Easements A nonexclusive right of ingress,egress and support through the Limited Common Elements is appurtenant to each Unit, and all of the General Common Elements are subject to such rights. Except as otherwise limited in this Declaration, each Unit Owner shall have the right to use the Common Elements for all purposes incident to the use of, and occupancy of, the Unit and such other incidental uses permitted by this Declaration, which rights shall be appurtenant to and run with the whole Unit. Easement for Utilities A non-exclusive easement shall exist through, over and across each Unit for inspection, installation, maintenance, replacement and repair of such utility lines and mechanical equipment for the use of all of the Unit Owners. Such inspection, installation, maintenance, replacement or repair of such easement rights shall only be done under the direction and approval and with the Page 7 of 40 i authority of the Association and/or the Manager unless an emergency exists in which event any action may reasonably be taken which is justified under the circumstances to minimize damage which would otherwise occur as a consequence of such emergency. Such lines and/or equipment shall be so installed,maintained,inspected,replaced and repaired in a manner such that it does not unreasonably interfere with or interrupt the use of the Unit by the Owner of the same. The Declarant reserves the right at any time during the development of the Condominium or during the creation of any Sub-Units to grant easements for utilities,including but not limited to power, gas and electric, cable TV and other communications and computer facilities over, under and across the Condominium project to appropriate governmental agencies or public utility companies. Any such easement may be conveyed by Declarant without the consent of any Unit Owner, Mortgagee or other person and shall be evidenced by an appropriate amendment to this Declaration. All of the Unit Owners and Mortgagees of Units and other persons interested or to become interested, in the condominium from time to time shall be deemed to have irrevocably and unanimously consented to such amendment of this Declaration as may be required to effectuate the foregoing grant of easement. i Easement for Maintenance.Repair and Replacement The Declarant,the Association and all public or private utilities shall have easements over, under, across and through the condominium and Property, including all Units and Common Elements, as may be necessary to fulfill any responsibilities of maintenance, repair, replacement, or construction which they, or any of them, are required or permitted to perform under this Declaration or by law. These easements include without any implication of limitation,the right of the Association to obtain access at all times to meters, controls, valves, pipes, conduits and other Common Elements located within or to gain access through any Unit or its appurtenant Limited Common Elements. Such easements shall not unreasonably interfere with or interrupt a Unit Owner's quiet enjoyment of his, her or its Unit. If the Property Owner's Association fails to install or maintain improvements according to plans approved by the City of Bozeman, the City may, at its option, complete construction or improvements and/or maintain improvements. The City's representative, contractors and engineers shall have the right to enter upon the property and perform such work, and the Association must permit and secure any additional costs associated with the installation or maintenance of improvements. The cost of the City to maintain may become a lien against both the Common Elements and the Units in the same way that the Association has the right to lien a Unit Owner for failure to pay its assessments. Interior Remodeling, Exterior Maintenance and Repair Each Unit Owner shall have the exclusive right to paint, repaint, tile, wax, paper, panel, carpet, brick or otherwise maintain, refinish and decorate the inner surfaces of the walls, ceilings, and floors bounding his own Unit, and the interior thereof, so long as such owner does not affect the structural integrity of the Building in which his Unit is located. Each Unit Owner shall have the right to decorate the surface of its exterior windows and exterior doors so long as it complies with the City of Bozeman Sign code and the Unit Owner obtains prior written approval of the Association,which shall not be unreasonably withheld. i Page 8 of 40 Each Unit shall maintain, repair and replace the exterior and roof of its Unit and other Limited and General Common Elements as necessary. If a Unit fails to maintain their Unit, the Association may do so on behalf of the Unit after having first sent a written notice to the Unit Owner stating the repair/maintenance needed and providing the Unit Owner fails to do so after notice,the Association may perform the repair/maintenance and charge the same,plus 10%to the non-complying Unit Owner. The Unit Owner shall first receive written approval from the Association prior to any remodel or change in the exterior of the Building or other Limited Common Elements. IV. OWNERSHIP AND VOTING—EXHIBITS—USE Percentage of Interest Each Unit Owner shall be entitled to the exclusive ownership, use and possession of his Unit. Additionally, each Unit Owner shall have a percentage of undivided interest in the General Common Elements of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. Such percentage represents his ownership interest in the General Common Elements, his liability for Common Expenses, and his voting interest in all matters concerning the Association of Unit Owners and this Declaration. The percentage of interest in the General Common Elements for the respective owners shall be computed by taking the Building square footage of each Unit as set forth below and dividing it by the total Building square footage of all the Units having an interest in the General Common Elements of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. Such percentage of interest owned by each of the initial Units of the Building in IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM shall be according to the percentages set forth below: PERCENTAGE OF BUILDING INTEREST IN UNIT SQUARE GENERAL COMMON NO. FOOTAGE ELEMENTS 1 39,882 32.176% 2 10,592 8.545% 3 15,879 12.811% 4 26,385 21.287% 5 2,175 1.755% 6 29,037 23.426% Total 123,950 100% Page 9 of 40 All Unit Owners and purchasers acknowledge that while initially there has been constructed six(6)Buildings containing six (6) separate Units that the initial percentages set forth are based upon, that at such time as construction is completed, that the percentages of ownership of Common Elements and voting interest may change to adjust to the exact as built square footages upon completion. All Unit Owners and purchasers,their heirs, successors and assigns agree and consent that the real property described on Exhibit A shall be developed with the construction of the Units by Declarant or Declarant's successors or assigns. In this regard, all Owners,mortgagees,purchasers and their heirs, successors and assigns of any Unit or interest into the Condominium created hereunder agree to and do hereby appoint the Declarant or Declarant's successors, assigns or designee as having a Power of Attorney to effectuate the development of this Property, including filing any supplemental Declarations required to adjust the Percentage of Interest in the General Common Elements to reflect the actual square footages once each Unit is built, or as may be necessary to create Sub-Units. The above Agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the Unit Owners of the then existing Units who upon acquiring titles to such Units by this covenant agree and consent to the filing of such Amendment and by this covenant agree to and consent to the appointment of the Declarant as their attorney in fact so that the Declarant may in its discretion simply file the Amendment on its own initiative having been herein given the power and authority to make such Amendments for and on behalf of all subsequent Unit Owners in the Condominium. After the recording of such Supplement all Unit Owners shall have a non-exclusive right and license,subject to the provisions herein to use and enjoy all of the General Common Elements created by such Supplement. In addition, the Unit Owners shall further have the non-exclusive right and license to use and enjoy the Limited Common Elements which are appurtenant to and part of their respective Units which may be added to the Condominium regime which are limited to the use of less than all of the Unit Owners. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Declaration or in Supplemental Declarations, all of the provisions,terms and definitions herein contained shall,upon recording of the same,be deemed expanded to include the additional Sub-Units. Floor Plans and Exhibits IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM will consist of six (6) Buildings located on the Property described in Exhibit "A" which shall contain a total of six (6) separate Units as shown on the proposed site plans. For identification and descriptive purposes, the following Exhibits are attached and by reference hereto incorporated into and made a part of this Declaration: Exhibit A: Legal Description. Exhibit B: Description of Common Elements Exhibit C: Leased Parking Area Exhibit D: Underground Parking Garage Page 10 of 40 Exhibit E: Site Plan showing the proposed location of the Buildings containing IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM Units on the Property. Exhibit F: showing the floor plans which include elevations, area, dimension, and designation for each Unit of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM. The floor plans attached hereto are subject to change upon completion of construction of each Unit as more specifically described below. Exhibit G: showing the Architect's Certificate. Exhibit H: showing the Certificate of Name. Exhibit P showing Storm Water Maintenance Plan Supplemental Plans and Certificate Following_Construction Each Unit Owner must construct and locate his or her Building within the area designated for that particular Unit on the Site Plan. Within thirty (30) days upon completion of the construction of the Building containing the Unit or from the date of the first occupancy of the Unit, whichever occurs first, the Unit Owner shall file a supplement to this Declaration as to that Unit only and setting forth the following information: a. Final floor plans as to such Unit; b. A certificate executed by an architect,land surveyor or engineer certifying that the final floor plans fully and accurately depict the layout of the Unit and the improvements in the Building as constructed and the date that the construction of such Unit and Building was completed; and c. A description of the Building and the materials of which it is constructed; The Owner of the Unit need not obtain the consent of any other Unit Owner or mortgagee when recording a Supplemental Declaration as to his or her Unit, however, the Supplemental Declaration may not alter the boundaries of any other Unit, the General Common Elements, or make any other substantive change to this Declaration without a duly executed Amendment to this Declaration as herein provided. Construction of Unit/Building The Unit Owner constructing his or her Building and Unit shall give all notices and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of any public authority having jurisdiction. When constructing his or her Unit, the Unit Owner shall fully comply with this Declaration,any duly adopted rules and regulations of the Association,and other applicable private covenants and restrictions. The Unit Owner shall be responsible for all safety precautions in connection with the construction of the Unit. Prior to commencement of construction, the Unit Owner shall obtain all building permits, other permits, licenses, inspections and government approvals necessary for construction. The Unit Owner shall insure that the area of construction is cleaned up on a daily basis,including all construction generated debris,drink cans,food wrappers, and/or other trash. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Unit Owner undertaking construction of his or her Unit shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Association, other Unit Owners and their Page l l of 40 representatives, owners, employees, members, managers and agents from all claims, losses, damages and expenses, including attorney's fees arising out of or resulting from the construction of the indemnifying Unit Owner's Unit and Building. During periods of construction of a Unit,the Association may assign and designate certain portions of the General Common Elements as construction staging areas for such Unit. Such assignment shall be fair and non-discriminatory. The Unit Owner shall limit any construction materials to the site of the Unit as asset forth on the Site Plan and any designated construction staging area of the general Common Elements as assigned by the Association. The Unit Owner undertaking construction will keep the Common Elements free and clear of any and all construction liens. In the event the Unit Owner should allow any lien or encumbrance of any type or nature to be placed upon the Common Elements,and in the event such Unit Owner should fail, refuse, or neglect to discharge, satisfy, pay and/or remove any such lien or encumbrance from the Common Elements within thirty(30) days of the filing of the same, the Association may, at the Association's option, elect to pay, discharge, satisfy, and/or remove any said lien or encumbrances, and in the event the Association elects to exercise the Association's option to pay, discharge, satisfy, and/or remove any such lien or encumbrance, any amount of monies paid by the Association in connection with the payment and satisfaction of any lien or Encumbrance shall be due and payable immediately from the Unit Owner to the Association and any such sums shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent(10%)per annum until paid in full and such unpaid amount shall be considered an assessment against the Unit and shall be the basis for the Association filing an assessment lien against the Unit. The Association's remedy to pay, discharge, satisfy, and/or remove any lien or encumbrances placed upon the Common Elements thirty (30) days after the notice of filing in the same is not exclusive, and the Association may exercise any and all remedies available under this Declaration and/or at law or in equity, the cost of which, including reasonable attorney's fees, shall be ch-_atgeable to the Unit Owner. Storm Water Maintenance Plan Attached hereto as Exhibit I is the Storm Water Maintenance Plan that is binding upon the Condominium. The Association shall follow and adhere to such plan. Construction Materials The proposed principal materials of construction of the Units are concrete for the foundations, footings, and slabs. Framing materials shall include structural steel columns and beams, wood beams and dimensional lumber,wood trusses, and wood structural panels(plywood or OSB). Siding and exterior finishes shall include brick, metal panels, and various manufactured cementitious siding products. Interior common area finishes may consist of solid wood or manufactured wood trims, carpet, tile, drywall and paint, acoustical ceiling tiles and/or or others. Roof materials will consist of asphalt shingles on typical sloped roofs and rubber membrane roofing on flat or low slope roof sections. Upon completion of each Unit, if the construction material Varied from what is described herein,the Unit Owner shall include in its Supplement,the building material for that Unit. Page 12 of 40 1 1 Subdivision Provisions: Additional Condominium Regimes and Sub-Units The Owner of each Unit shall have the right to file an additional Condominium Declaration pursuant to the terms of the Montana Unit Ownership Act; Title 70, Section 23, Montana Code Annotated in order to.subdivide his or her Unit and create an additional condominium regime within such Unit. Such right, however, shall be subject to the Unit Owner's obligation to obtain all necessary approvals and permits from the City of Bozeman and any other legal entity with jurisdiction thereof. The rights and interest of any additional condominium regime Unit Owner shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Declaration and the additional Condominium Declaration. Upon the creation of-a within a Unit, the voting interest and all other rights of such Unit provided hereunder shall thereafter be exercised and controlled by the Unit Owners Association of such additional condominium regime and all references set forth herein to "Unit Owner" shall be deemed to apply to the Unit Owners Association of such additional condominium regime. Use The use of Units 1, 2 and 3 in IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM shall be residential use only. The use of Unit 6 shall be commercial only. The use of Unit 4 shall be mixed, with the first floor consisting of mixed residential and commercial uses and all other floors shall be residential. Unit 5 shall be commercial. Nothing shall prohibit a Unit Owner from leasing or renting his Unit to third persons or holding it out for lease`oi rental,or entering into an Agreement or contract with others for the lease or rental of his Unit.The use of the General Common Areas shall be for the use of the Unit Owners, their guests, tenants, lessees, employees and business invitees. The Units and common elements shall be limited as follows: a. No automobile fuel sales or repair shall be allowed. b. No tattoo parlors, marijuana dispensaries (medical or otherwise), vape shops, and laundromats. C. There shall be no obstruction of the Common Elements,nor shall anything be stored in or on the Common Elements without the prior written consent of the Association. Each Owner shall be obligated to maintain and keep in good order and repair the interior of their Unit. d. Nothing shall be done or kept in any Unit or in the Common Elements which will increase the rate of insurance on the Building or contents thereof, without the prior written consent of the Association. No owner shall permit anything to be done or kept in their Unit or in the Common Elements which will result in the cancellation of insurance on the Building,or contents thereof,or which would be in violation of any law. No waste will be permitted on the Common Elements. e. Except for appropriate signs, as discussed under Article III above and Miscellaneous below, Unit Owners shall not cause or permit anything to be hung or displayed on the outside of windows or placed on the outside walls or roof of a building, and no awning, canopy,radio, satellite dish or television antenna shall be Page 13 of 40 affixed to or placed upon the exterior walls or roof of any part thereof, without the prior written consent of the Association. Further all signs must meet the provisions of the City of Bozeman Sign Code. : i f. No nuisances shall be allowed upon the Property nor shall any use or practice be allowed which is a source of annoyance to the Unit Owners or which interferes with the peaceful possession and proper use"of the Property by its residents. No offensive or unlawful use shall be made of the Property nor any part thereof, and all valid laws,zoning ordinances and regulations of all governmental bodies having jurisdiction thereof shall be observed. g. Nothing shall be done in any Unit or in, on or to the Common Elements which will impair the structural integrity of the Building or which would structurally change the Building, except as is otherwise provided herein. h. No animals of any kind shall be raised, bred, or kept in any individual residential unit located within a Unit, except as allowed by each Unit or sub-association and as established by each Units or Sub Unit Association's rules and regulations. The Association may make rules and regulations from time to time should each Unit or sub-association fail to properly manage animals upon the Common or Limited Common Elements. All dogs must be kept on a leash while on the Property. Additionally, Unit Owners, their tenants, and any guests, shall be responsible for the immediate clean-up of any pet waste and the repair of any damage caused by pets to any of the General Common Elements or Limited Common.Elements. Any pet which bites another animal or a human'lupon the premises shall be immediately and permanently removed unless it can be shown by clear and convincing evidence, as determine by the Board, that the animal was unreasonably provoked into such action. For purposes of the foregoing sentence, any animal which is restrained in some reasonable fashion but is approached by another animal or human shall be presumed to be the non-aggressor. Failure to timely remove the pet(s) can result in a fine not to exceed$50.00 per day for each day the pet remains on the Property or in the Unit, which fine shall become part of the assessments for that Unit. Failure to immediately pick up after a Unit Owner's animal or an animal belonging to a tenant of the Unit on the common area swill result in a$50.00 fine for each offense, which shall also become a part of the assessment for the Unit,regardless of whether the offending animal is owned by the Unit:Owner or by a tenant of the Unit or any portion thereof. Failure of an Owner to adhere to pet regulations and requirements shall be grounds for the Association and other Unit Owners to maintain a nuisance action to remove the offending pet(s). The Association shall have the authority to ban certain breeds of dogs or individual dogs from IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM, provided that such actions are based upon objective criteria related to aggressive tendencies of the breed or individual dogs. In the event that an Owner leases his or her Unit to a person who has pets, the Owner of the Unit shall be responsible for the enforcement of the pet restrictions and rules, and any fines imposed shall be a charge against the,Unit, for which the Association may obtain satisfaction in the same manner as-if the Unit Owner failed to pay an assessment imposed against the Unit. The.Association shall have the right to file a lien against the Unit and shall have the right to foreclose said lien in the same manner as provided herein. Page 14 of 40 i. Nothing shall be altered or constructed in or removed from the Common Elements, and no easements, liens or encumbrances placed on the Common Elements, except upon the written consent of one hundred percent (100%) of the Unit Owners affected by such action. j. Unit 1 shall have a trash compactor and recycling located inside the Building,which it shall share with Unit 2. Unit 4 shall have:a trash compactor and recycling in its Building, which it will share with Unit 3. Units 5 and 6 shall each have their own trash compactors and recycling areas located inside their Buildings. k. Campers, trailers, boats and other recreational vehicles may only be brought onto the Property or onto any street bordering the Property for loading and unloading for immediate use. No inoperable vehicles, -and no campers, boats, recreational vehicles, or trailers, shall be left parked in the condominium parking areas or underground garage parking area or on any street bordering the condominium Property for more than two(2)hours at one time. Repeated parking of such vehicles or trailers is also prohibited. No one may reside in any recreational vehicles, trailers, or motor homes upon the Property. Violators of this paragraph are subject to towing and fines levied by the Board in the Board's discretion. 1. Canvassing, solicitation and peddling the Condominium property is prohibited and Unit Owners shall report and otherwise cooperate to prevent the same. . in. No building or structure shall be occupied or open for business until the exterior is completed and the interior of the space open to the public as completed. All applicable government agencies, inspections and permits shall be obtained and followed prior to occupancy. n. All zoning, land use regulations and all other laws, rules and regulations of any government or agency under whose jurisdiction the land lies are considered to be part of and enforceable hereunder,and all of the Owners of said land shall be bound by such laws, rules and regulations. In the event there is a conflict between the covenants and the applicable zoning, the most restrictive provision of either the covenants or the zoning shall control. o. No repair nor maintenance of vehicles is to be done in the Parking Garage or Leased Parking Area. Exclusive Ownership M Each Owner shall be entitled to exclusive ownership and possession of their Unit. Such Owners may use the General and Limited Common Elements in accordance with the purposes for which they are intended and as they may otherwise agree between themselves, so long as they do not hinder or encroach upon the lawful rights of other Unit Owners. V. i THE ASSOCIATION Membership Page 15 of 40 An Owner of a Unit in IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM shall automatically, upon becoming the Owner of said Unit, be a member of the Unit Owners Association (or Association), and shall remain a member of said Association until such time as his membership in said Association shall automatically cease. The membership shall be limited to Unit Owners as defined in this Declaration. The Association may not be voluntarily dissolved without the permission of the commissioners for the City of Bozeman. Function It shall be the function of the Association to: a. Adopt Bylaws for the governance of the Association. i b. Make provisions for the general management and/or repairs and maintenance of IDA AND COTTONWOOD'CONDOMINIUM. C. Levy assessments as provided for in the Declaration, Bylaws and Unit Ownership Act. d. Adopt and implement policies,rules and regulations necessary or desirable for managing the Association's affairs. e. Enter into contracts or hire personnel for the management of the affairs of the Association including the maintenance and repair of common areas. Voting On all matters,unless excluded by this Declaration,to be decided by the Association, each Unit Owner shall have a vote equal to his or her percentage of interest in the General Common Elements. Multiple owners of a single condominium Unit shall collectively have such voting interest. In the event that a "sub-condominium" is declared for any Unit, such Unit's voting interest shall be exercised by the Association of Unit Owners for such condominium. An Owner of a condominium Unit, upon becoming an Owner, shall be a member of the Association and remain a member for the period of his or her Unit ownership. Except as otherwise provided in the Unit Ownership Act, this Declaration or. the Bylaws, a majority of the Unit ownership percentage present at any meeting or by proxy shall be sufficient to act on matters brought before the Unit Owners. Meetings of the Unit Owners shall only be conducted when a quorum is present, as defined in the Association Bylaws. Failure to Comply Each Owner shall comply strictly with the provisions of this Declaration, the Bylaws of the Association, and the rules, regulations, decisions and resolutions of the Association adopted pursuant thereto as the same may be lawfully amended from time to time. Failure to comply with any of the same shall be grounds for an action to recover sums due,for damages or injunctive relief Page 16 of 40 or both, and for reimbursement of all costs, including attorney fees incurred in connection therewith, which action shall be maintainable by the Manager in the name of the Association, on behalf of the Owner, or in the proper case, by an aggrieved"Owner. Enforcement The Association through its Board shall have the power to impose reasonable fines for violation of any duty imposed under the Declaration, Bylaws or any rules and regulations duly adopted hereunder;provided,however,nothing herein shall authorize the Association or the Board of Directors to limit ingress and egress to or from a Unit or to suspend an Owner's right to vote due to nonpayment of assessments. In the event that any occupant of a Unit violates the Declaration, Bylaws or a rule or regulation and a fine is imposed, the fine shall first be assessed against the occupant;provided,however,that if the fine is-not paid by the occupant within the time period set by the Board,the Owner shall pay the fine upon notice from the Association. The failure of the Board to enforce any provision of the Declaration, Bylaws or any rule or regulation shall not be deemed a waiver of the right of the Board to do so thereafter. (a) Notice. Prior to imposition of any sanction, the Board or its delegate shall serve the alleged violator with written notice describing (i) the nature of the alleged violation, (ii)the proposed sanction imposed, (iii) a period of not less than 10 days within which the alleged violator may present a written request to the Board of Directors for s hearing; and(iv) a statement that the proposed sanction shall be imposed as contained in the notice unless a challenge is begun within 10 days of the notice. If a timely challenge is not made, the sanction statCd in the notice shall be imposed. (b) Hearing. If a hearing is requested in a timely manner,the Board shall conduct a hearing affording the alleged violator a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Prior to the effectiveness of any sanction hereunder, proof of proper notice shall be placed in the minutes of the meeting. Such proof shall be deemed adequate if a copy of the notice, together with a statement of the date and manner of delivery, is entered by the officer, Director or agent who delivered such notice. The notice requirement shall be deemed satisfied if the alleged violator appears at the meeting. The minutes of the meeting shall contain a written statement of the results of the hearing and the sanction, if any, imposed. The Board of Directors may, but shall not be obligated to, suspend any proposed sanction if the violation is cured within the 10 day period. Such suspension shall not constitute a waiver of the right to sanction future violations of the same or other provisions and rules by any person. (c) Additional Enforcement Rights. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein contained,the Association, acting through the.Board of Directors,may elect to enforce any provision of the Declaration, the Bylaws or the rules and regulations of the Association by self-help (specifically including, but not limited to, the towing of vehicles that are in violation of parking rules:and regulations) or by suite at law or in equity to enjoin any violation or to recovery monetary damages or both without the necessity of compliance with the procedure set forth above. In any such action, to the maximum extent permissible, the Owner or occupant responsible for the violation of Page 17 of 40 1 which abatement is sought shall pay all costs actually incurred, including reasonable attorney's fees. Payment of Assessments All assessments shall be due thirty(30)days from the date such assessment is placed in the mail following the meeting during which assessments are levied by the Association, and may be payable in monthly installments. The amount of the Common Expenses assessed against each Unit, and the amount of Limited Common Expenses assessed against each Unit, shall be the personal and individual debt of the Owner thereof. No Owner may exempt himself from liability for this contribution toward the common and the Limited Expenses by waiver of the use of enjoyment of any of the General Common Elements or Limited Common Elements or by abandonment of his Unit. All assessments which are not paid within thirty(30)days from the date they are due and payable become delinquent and are subject to any penalty that may be established in the Bylaws for the purpose and the maximum interest charges permitted by law. The Association or Manager shall have the responsibility of taking prompt action to collect any unpaid assessment which becomes delinquent. In the event of delinquency in the payment of the assessment, the Unit Owner shall be obligated to pay interest at the statutory rate provided for under Montana law on the amount of the assessment from the due date thereof, together with all expenses, including attorney fees incurred, together with such penalties as are provided in the Bylaws of the Association. Suit to recover a money judgment for unpaid Common Expenses and Limited Expenses may be maintainable without foreclosing or waiving the lien securing the same. In the event that an additional condominium regime is declared for a Unit as herein provided, the Association of Unit Owners for such additional condominium regime shall be responsible for paying all assessments levied against the Unit and shall be considered the Unit Owner for such purpose. The Association shall retain the right to file a lien against any or all of the sub-association condominium units in the event that the Association of Unit Owners for such sub-condominium fails to make timely payment of its assessment. Leyying Assessments—When Made—Purposes The Association of Unit Owners shall levy assessments upon the Unit Owners in the following manner and for the following reasons: a. Assessments shall be made as a part of the regular business of the Association at any regular or special meeting thereof as provided in the Bylaws of the Association. Notice of the assessment and the purpose for which it is made whether regular or special, shall be served on all Unit Owners. affected by delivering a copy of the same to the Owner personally or by mailing a copy of the notice to the Owners at their addresses of record at least ten (10) days prior to the date for such meeting. An Owner may request notice be sent by email by providing such request to the Association and providing an email address.. Page 18 of 40 b. Assessments shall be made for the repair, replacement, general maintenance, management and administration of Common Elements, fees,costs and expenses of the Manager, taxes for common areas 1 insurance and for the Unit Owner's percentage share of any Special Improvement District Assessments. Assessments shall be based upon and computed by using the percentage of interest that each Unit Owner has in the General Common Elements, unless, however the tax-exempt status of a Unit Owner requires the re-allocation of real property taxes assessed against the Common Elements of the Condominium in another matter to account for this tax-exempt status. C. Assessments may also be made for the payment of Limited Common Element expenses such that the Unit Owners are chargeable only for the expenses relating to their respective units. Unit Owners shall share in the payment for Limited Expenses for the repair, maintenance and replacement of Limited Common Elements for which the assessment is being made. If only one Unit is associated with the Limited Common Elements involved, then the entire cost of such repair, maintenance or replacement shall be borne by that Unit. d. Assessments may also be made for any purpose contemplated by this Declaration and for any purposes set out in the Montana Unit Ownership Act. e. Common expenses and profits, if any, of the Condominiums shall be distributed and charged to, the Unit Owners according to the percentage of undivided interest of each in the General Common Elements. f In a voluntary conveyance of a Unit, the Grantee of the Unit shall be jointly and severally liable with the Grantor for all unpaid assessments by the Association against the latter for his share of the Common Expenses up to the time of the grant or conveyance,without prejudice to the Grantee's right to recover from the Grantor the amount paid by the Grantee therefor. However, any such Grantee shall be entitled to a statement from the or Board of Directors of the Association,as the case may be, setting forth the amount of said unpaid assessments against the Grantor due the Association and such Grantee shall not be liable for, nor shall the Unit conveyed be subject to a lien for, any unpaid assessments made by the Association against the Grantor in excess of the amount therein set forth. g. The monthly assessment for Common Expenses shall be fixed by the Board and shall be based upon the estimate of the actual cost thereof, excluding therefrom any estimated amount for contingencies, reserves or sinking funds. Each Unit Owner shall pay its pro rata share of monthly assessments for Common Expenses based upon its Percentage of Interest as defined in Article IV;provided,however,that for Units owned by Declarant and for which the interior construction is incomplete and the Unit is unoccupied, charges for garbage, sewer and water shall be excluded from the monthly assessments levied against said Unit(s). Such exclusion shall not apply to Units for which the interior construction is complete, and which are temporarily vacant. Page 19 of 40 The Board may also create a reserve budget, into which reserve assessments shall be deposited. If made,reserve assessments shall not apply to Units owned by Declarant for which the interior construction is incomplete until September 1, 2024. After September 1, 2024 reserve assessments shall apply to all Units,regardless of completion. VI. DECLARANT'S RIGHT TO CHANGE The Declarant reserves the right to change the interior design and arrangement of all Units, and alter the boundaries between Units, so long as the Declarant owns the Units so altered. No such change shall increase the number of Units or alter the boundary of the General Common Elements without an amendment of this Declaration. Until the Building and the shell for one hundred percent(100%) of all Units, including the expansion, have been built, Declarant reserves the right to establish easements, reservations, exceptions and exclusions consistent with the Condominium project and this Declaration, as may be needed to facilitate the expansion. Notwithstanding any other provisions expressly or impliedly to the contrary contained in this Declaration,the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Association,Declarant reserves the right to appoint three(3) of the members of the initial Board of Directors of the Association, who shall serve until the first annual meeting of the members of the Association,at which time one (1) of their successors shall be elected by the members. Declarant reserves the right to then appoint two (2) members of the Board of Directors until the date on which 75% of the Units have been occupied or transferred by Declarant to a third party or until September 1,2024,whichever occurs first. V11. AMENDMENT Amendment of this Declaration shall be made in the following manner: At any regular or special meeting of the Association of Unit Owners,such amendment may be proposed as a resolution by any Unit Owner, the Board or Manager. Upon adoption of the resolution by majority of a those present,the amendment shall be made a subject for consideration at the next succeeding meeting of the Association with notice thereof, together with a copy of the amendment,to be furnished to each Owner no later than ten.(10) days in advance of such meeting. At such meeting, the amendment shall be approved upon jeceiving the favorable vote of seventy- five percent (75%) of the total percentage vote of all of the Unit Owners. If so approved, it shall be the responsibility of the Association or its delegate to file the amendment with the Clerk and Recorder's Office of Gallatin County, Montana. Page 20 of 40 • I • Notwithstanding the procedure set forth above,the Declarant may amend this Declaration, or any other project document, prior to any sale or lease of a Unit or interest thereof, and reserves the right at any time to file any supplements necessary to add the Building Expansion in to the Condominium Declaration as further described in Section IV by filing a Supplement hereto without the requirement of holding a meeting. Further, Declarant or its successors or assigns may file a Supplemental Declaration upon completion of each Building or upon the creation of Sub:Units. VIII. MAINTENANCE, CHANGES,REPAIRS AND LIENS Alterations by Unit Owners Association The interior plan of a Unit may be changed by the Owner. The boundaries between Units may be changed only by the Owners of the Units affected. No Units may be subdivided without the approval of seventy-five percent (75%) of the total percentage vote of all of the Unit Owners and compliance with all laws, rules and regulations relating to the same. No change in the boundaries of Units shall encroach upon the boundaries of the Common Elements. Boundary walls must be equal in quality of design and construction to the existing boundary walls. A change in the boundaries between Units shall be set forth in an amendment to this Declaration. In addition to compliance with the provisions of Paragraph VII above, such amendment must further set forth and contain plans for the Units concerned showing the Units after the change in boundaries, which plans shall be drawn by an architect licensed to practice in Montana, and attached to the amendment as exhibits, together with the certificate of architect or engineer required by the Unit Ownership Act. Such 'an amendment shall be signed and acknowledged by the Owners of the Units concerned, as well as those Owners with an interest in any common element affected. The amendment shall also be approved by the Board of Directors of the Association, and signed and acknowledge by all lienors and mortgagees of the Units concerned. Any change in the exterior boundary of a Unit mus= be approved by the City of Bozeman. Maintenance by Unit Owners Each Owner shall maintain and keep in repair the interior and exterior of his own Unit, including the fixtures thereof. All fixtures and equipment installed in the Unit, commencing at a point where the utilities enter the Unit,shall be maintained and kept in repair by the Owner thereof. An Owner shall do no act nor any work that will impair the structural soundness or integrity of the Building or impair any easement. Each Owner shall also keep any entrance area appurtenant to his Unit in a clean and sanitary condition. The right of each Owner to repair,alter,and remodel the interior of their Unit is coupled with the obligation to replace any finishing or other materials removed with similar type or kinds of materials. All exterior window replacement shall be by the same manufacturer with similar Page 21 of 40 quality, shade and design and done by the Association. No act or alteration, repairing or remodeling by any Unit Owner shall impair in any way the integrity of the adjoining Units or the integrity of Limited Common Elements or General Common Elements. Exterior Alterations No Owner may change, alter or remodel the exterior of his Unit without the prior written approval of the Association. Snow Removal and Open Space Maintenance Each Unit shall be responsible for snow removal pursuant to City policy from the sidewalks adjacent to the common areas. The snow removal contractor will also ensure that the inlets and outlets to the storm water detention basins are unobstructed. The Association shall be responsible for snow removal from Common Area walkways and Parking Areas. The Association shall be responsible for following,the regular maintenance program for Common areas, including but not limited to the following: The Association, shall also retain a contractor to maintain the open space as healthy, clean and well kept. Any grass and/or trees located in the common open space shall be trimmed as needed and any law sprinkler system shall be kept in working order. Common Area pathways shall be maintained by the Association and kept and maintained in a safe condition. Any Common Area lighting must be kept in working order by the Association. The Association shall be responsible for following the storm water maintenance plan shown on Exhibit . These responsibilities shall be the responsibility of the Declarant until such rights and responsibilities are turned over to the Association. Liens for Alterations Labor performed and materials furnished and incorporated into a Unit with the consent of or at the request of the Unit Owner, his agent,his contractor or subcontractor shall be the basis for the filing of a lien against the Unit or the Unit Owner consenting to or requesting the same. Each Unit Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless each of the other Owners from and against all liability arising from the claim of any lien against the Unit or any other Owner or against the General or Limited Common Elements for construction performed or for labor,materials, services or other products incorporated in the Owner's Unit at such Owner's request. Liens and Foreclosures All sums assessed but unpaid for the share of general Common Expenses and Limited Common Expenses chargeable to any Unit shall constitute a lien on such Unit superior to all other liens and encumbrances, except only for tax and special assessment liens on the Unit in favor of any assessing authority, and all sums unpaid on a first mortgage, a first trust indenture, or contract for deed, of record. To evidence such lien, the Association shall prepare a written notice of lien Page 22 of 40 assessment setting forth the amount of such unpaid indebtedness, the amount of accrued interest and late charges thereon, the name of the Unit Owner, and a description of the Unit. Such notice shall be signed and verified by one of the officers of the Association or by the Manager, or his authorized agent, and shall be recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. Such lien shall be attached from the date of recording such notice. Such lien may be enforced by the foreclosure of the defaulting Owner's Unit by the Association as provided in the Unit Ownership Act in like manner as foreclosure of a mortgage on real property. In any foreclosure,the Unit Owner shall be required to pay a reasonable rental for the Unit,if so provided- in the Bylaws, and the plaintiff in such foreclosure action shall be entitled to the appointment of a receiver to collect the same. Suit to recover a money judgment for unpaid Common Expenses shall be maintainable without foreclosure or waiving tho -lien securing the same. In any such proceeding the Owner may be required to pay the costs, expenses and attorney's fees incurred in filing a lien, and in the event of foreclosure proceedings, additional costs, expenses and attorney's fees incurred. If a lien becomes effective against two or more Units,the owner of each Unit subject to the lien has the right to have the Owner's Unit released from the lien by payment of the amount of the lien attributable to the Owner's Unit.The amount of the lien attributable to a Unit and the payment required to satisfy a lien, in the absence of agreement, must be determined by application of the percentage established herein. A partial payment, satisfaction, or discharge may not prevent the lienor from proceeding to enforce the lienor's rights against any Unit and the undivided interest in the common element pertaining to a Unit not released by a payment, satisfaction, or discharge. Biddiniz at Foreclosure The Association shall have the power to bid on the Unit at a foreclosure or other legal sale, and to acquire and hold, lease, mortgage and vote the votes appurtenant to, convey or otherwise deal with the same. Any lienholder holding a lien on a Unit may pay, but shall not be required to pay, any unpaid General Common Expenses, or Limited Common Expenses payable with respect to any such Unit, and upon such payment such lienholder shall have a lien on said Unit for the amount paid of the same priority as the lien of his encumbrance without the necessity of having to file a notice or claim of such lien. IX. INSURANCE Purchase All insurance policies upon IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM Property shall be purchased by the Association and shall be issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in Montana. a. Named Insured: The named insured shall be the Association individually and as agent for the Unit Owners without naming them. Such policies shall provide that payments for losses thereunder by the insurer shall be paid to the insurance Trustee Page 23 of 40 hereinafter designated,and all policies and endorsements thereon shall be deposited with the insurance Trustee. Unit Owners may obtain insurance coverage, at their own expense, upon their own personal property and for their personal liability and living expense. b. Copies to Mortgagees: One copy of each insurance policy and of all endorsements thereon shall be furnished by the Association to each mortgagee of a Unit Owner on request. Coverage a. Casualty: All buildings and improvements upon the land shall be insured in an amount equal to the maximum insurable ,replacement value, and all personal property included in the Common Elements shall be fully insured, with all such insurance to be based on current replacement value, as determined annually by the Board of Directors, but subject to such deductible clauses as are required in order to obtain coverage at reasonable costs. ;'Such coverage shall afford protection against: (1) Loss or damage by fire and other hazards covered by a standard extended coverage endorsement; and (2) Such other risks as from time to time shall be customarily covered with respect to buildings similar in construction,location and use as the buildings on the land,including,but not limited to,vandalism and malicious mischief. (3) Errors or Omissions Insurance for the Directors, Officers and Managers if the Association so desires, in amounts to be determined by the Board. The policies shall state whether roof tope equipment, air handling or service equipment should be included or excluded. Each Unit's interior fixtures,finishes and floor coverings shall not be included within the Association's insurance. It shall be the responsibility of each Unit Owner to insure these items under their own insurance. b. Public Liability: In such amounts and with such coverage as shall be required by the Board of Directors of the Association; including, but not limited to, hired automobile and non-owned automobile coverage, if applicable, and with cross- liability endorsement to cover liabilities of the Unit Owners as a group to a Unit Owner. C. Other Insurance: Such other insurance as the Board of Directors of the Association shall determine from time to time to be desirable and as may be required by the Federal and State laws. Premiums Page 24 of 40 Premiums for insurance policies purchased by the Association shall be paid by the Association as a common expense, except that the amount of increase in the premium occasioned by use, misuse, occupancy or abandonment of a Unit or:its appurtenances or of the Common Elements by a Unit Owner shall be assessed against the Owner. Not less than Ten(10) days prior to the date when a premium is due,evidence of such payment shall be furnished by the Association to each mortgagee listed in the roster of mortgagees. Insurance Trustee All insurance policies purchased by the Association shall be for the benefit of the Association and the Unit Owners and their mortgagees as their interests may appear, and shall provide that all proceeds covering Property losses shall be paid to such bank in Montana with trust powers as may be designated as insurance trustee by the Board of Directors of the Association, which trustee is herein referred to as the insurance trustee. The insurance trustee shall not be liable for payment of premiums, nor for the renewal or the sufficiency of policies,nor for the failure to collect any insurance proceeds. The duty of the insurance trustee shall be to receive such proceeds as are paid and hold the same in trust for the purposes elsewhere stated in this instrument and for the benefit of the Unit Owners, and their mortgagees in the following shares, but which shares need not be set forth on the records of the insurance trustee: a. Unit Owners—An undivided share for each Unit Owner,such share being the same as the undivided share in the Common Elements appurtenant to his Unit. b. Mortgagees — In the event a mortgagee endorsement has been issues as to a Unit, the share of the Unit Owner shall be held in trust for the mortgagee and the Unit Owner as their interests may appear; provided, however, that no mortgagee shall have any right to determine or participate in the determination as to whether or not any damaged property shall be reconstructed or repaired, and no mortgagee shall have any right to apply or have applied to the reduction of a mortgage debt any insurance proceeds except distributions thereof made to the Unit Owner and mortgagee pursuant to the provision of this Declaration. Distribution of Proceeds Proceeds of insurance policies received by the insurance trustee shall be distributed to or for the benefit of the beneficial Owners in the following Manner: a. Miscellaneous-Expenses of administration,the insurance trustee,and construction or remodeling supervision shall be considered as part of the cost of construction, replacement or repair. b. Reconstruction or Repair—If the damage for which the proceeds are paid is to be repaired or reconstructed by the Association,the remaining proceeds shall be paid to defray the costs thereof as elsewhere provided. Any proceeds remaining after defraying such costs shall be distributed to the beneficial Owners, remittances to Unit Owners and their mortgagees being payable jointly to them. Page 25 of 40 C. Failure to Reconstruct or Repair — If it is determined in the manner elsewhere provided that the damage for which the proceeds are paid shall not be reconstructed or repaired, the remaining proceeds shall be distributed to the beneficial Owners, remittances to Unit Owners and their mortgagees being payable jointly to them. d. Certificate — In making distribution to Unit Owners and their mortgagees, the insurance trustee may rely upon a certificate from the Association made by its representative or Manager as to the names of the Unit Owners and their respective shares of the distribution. Association as Agent The Association is irrevocably appointed agent for each Unit Owner and for each Owner of a mortgage or other lien upon a Unit and for each-Owner of any other interest in the condominium Property to adjust all claims arising under insurance policies purchased by the Association and to execute and deliver releases upon the payment of claims. Benefit to Mortgagees Certain provisions in this paragraph entitled "Insurance" are for the benefit of mortgagees or trust indenture beneficiaries of condominium parcels, and all such provisions are covenants for the benefit of any mortgagee of a Unit and may be enforced by such mortgagee or beneficiary. Reconstruction A. Repair After Casualty If any part of the condominium property shall be damaged by casualty, whether or not it shall be reconstructed or repaired shall be determined in the following manner: 1. Lesser Damage — If a Unit or Units are found by the Board of Directors of the Association to be tenantable after the casualty, the damaged Property shall be repaired. 2. Greater Damage—If a Unit or Units are found by the Board of Directors to be not tenantable after the casualty,the damaged Property shall be reconstructed or rebuilt. 3. Certificate — The insurance trustee may rely upon a certificate of the Association made by its president and secretary to determine whether or not the damaged Property is to be reconstructed or repaired. B. Plans and Specifications. Any reconstruction or repair must be substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications and the original improvements, or if not, then according to plans and specifications approved by the Board of Directors and by more than Seventy-five percent (75%) of the Unit Page 26 of 40 Owners, including the Owners of all Units the plans for which are to be altered. Any such reconstructions not in accordance with the original plans and specifications must be set forth in an amendment to the Declaration, which amendment shall be prepared and filed of record in accordance with the provisions of such amended filing, more particularly set forth in Paragraph VII and Paragraph VIII, subparagraph 1, hereinabove. C. Responsibility. The responsibility for reconstruction or repair after casualty shall be the same as for maintenance and repair of the Property, and the Association shall work with the insurance trustee to carry out the provisions of this Article. D. Assessments. If the proceeds of insurance are not sufficient to defray the estimated costs of reconstruction or repair for which the Association is responsible, or if at any time during such reconstruction or repair, or upon completion of such reconstructions or repair,the funds for the payment of the costs thereof are insufficient, assessments shall be made against all Unit Owners in sufficient amounts to provide funds to the payment of such costs. Such assessments shall be in proportion to the Owner's percentage of interest in the General Common Elements. E. Construction Funds The funds for payment of costs of reconstruction or repair after casualty, which shall consist of proceeds of insurance held by the insurance trustee and funds collected by the Association from assessments against Unit Owners, shall be disbursed in the sound discretion of the trustee and according to the contract of reconstruction or repair,which contract must have the approval of the Board and Unit Owners involved. F. Surplus. It shall be presumed that the first monies disbursed in payment of costs of reconstruction and repair shall be from the insurance proceeds. If there is a balance in a construction fund after payment of all costs of the reconstruction and repair for which the fund is established,such balance shall be paid to the Association for the use and benefit of the Unit Owners. X. REMOVAL OR PARTITION—SUBDIVISION IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM may only be removed from condominium ownership, and may only be partitioned or sold, upon compliance with each of the conditions hereof: Page 27 of 40 a. The Board of Directors of the Association must approve the plans of removal, partition or sale, including the details of how any partition or sale, and the distribution of Property or funds,shall be accomplished. b. The plan of removal,partition,or sale must be approved as provided in the Montana Unit Ownership Act. Upon obtaining such approval,the Board shall be empowered to implement and carry out the plan of removal,partition, or sale. I : C. No Unit may be divided or subdivided into a smaller Unit, nor a portion thereof sold or otherwise transferred, except as provided above. d. This section shall not apply to the sale of individual Units and shall not be considered as a right of first refusal. e. The Common Elements of IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM shall not be abandoned,partitioned,subdivided, encumbered, sold or transferred without compliance with all of the above requirements. XI. REMEDIES All remedies provided in this Declaration and Bylaws shall not be exclusive of any other remedies which may now be, or are hereafter, available tQ the parties hereto as provided for by law. XII. SEVERABILITY The provisions hereof shall be deemed independent and severable and the invalidity,partial invalidity or unenforceability of any one or more provisions shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision hereof. XIII. INTERPRETATION The provisions of the Declaration and of the Bylaws to be promulgated and recorded herewith, shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purpose of the Declaration and Bylaws and to create a Building or buildings subject to and under the provisions of the Unit Ownership Act. XIV. ADDITIONAL CITY REOUIR.ED COVENANTS A. All County declared noxious weeds will be controlled by the Association. Page 28 of 40 B. Lot Owners and residents of the subdivision are informed that adjacent uses may be agricultural. Lot Owners accept and are aware that standard agricultural and farming practices can result in dust, animal odors and noise, smoke, flies, and machinery noise. Standard agricultural practices feature the use of heavy equipment, chemical sprays and the use of machinery early in the morning and sometimes late into the evening. C. That all fence bordering agricultural lands must be maintained by the Association in accordance with State law. D. That any covenant which is required as a condition of the preliminary plat approval and required by the City Commission may not be amended or revoked without the mutual consent of the Owners in accordance with the amendment procedures in the covenants and the City Commission. E. Open space shown on the approved final plan or plat must not be used for the construction of any structures not shown on the final plan. XV. MISCELLANEOUS Utility Easements In addition to the easements provided for herein; easements are reserved through the condominium Property as may be required for utility services, including heat, air conditioning, water, sewer, power,telephone, natural gas and cable television, in order to serve IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM adequately. However, such easements through the Property or Units shall be only according to the plans and specificAtions for the Unit Building, as set forth in the recorded plat, or as the Building is constructed, unless approved in writing by the Unit Owner. Right of Access The Association shall have the irrevocable right, to be exercised by the Manager or Board of Directors, to have access to each Unit from time to time during reasonable hours as may be necessary for the maintenance, repair or replacement of any of the Limited Common Elements therein or accessible therefrom, or for making emergency repairs therein necessary to prevent damage to the general or Limited Common Elements or to any other Unit. Damage to the interior or any part of the Unit' resulting from maintenance, repair, emergency repair or replacement of any of the general or Limited Common Elements,or as a result of an emergency repair within another Unit at the instance of the Association, shall be designated either Limited or General Common Expenses by the Association and assessed in accordance with such designation. Page 29 of 40 Expenditures No single expenditure or debt in excess Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) may be made or incurred by the Association or Manager without the prior approval or Seventy-five percent (75%) of the Unit Owners, according to their percentile interest. Benefit Except as otherwise provided herein,this Declaration shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Declarant, the Association and each Unit Owner, and the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of each. Service of Process The name and address of the person to receive service of process for IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM until another designation is filed of record shall be: Holly March Summers March Law, P.C. 517 S. 22"d Avenue, Suite 1 Bozeman,MT 59718 Warranties The Declarant expressly makes no warranties or representations concerning the Property, the Units,the Declaration,Bylaws, or deeds of conveyance except as specifically set forth therein, and no one may rely upon such warranty or representation not so specifically expressed therein. Estimates of Common Expenses are deemed accurate, but no warranty or guarantee is made or is intended,nor may one be relied upon. Signs The size, location and placement of all signs, including but not limited to signs on siding, exterior doors and exterior windows must be approved by the Owners Association before installation,which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. All signs must be in conformity with city zoning and sign ordinances then in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused this Declaration to be made and executed according to the provisions of the Montana Unit.Ownership Act, Title 70, Section 23, MCA. Bangtail Partners, LLC Page 30 of 40 By: Member STATE OF ) :ss County of ) On this day of , 20 before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of ,personally appeared ,known to me to be a Member of Bangtail Partners, LLC and the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same pursuant to the authority granted in him. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Residing at: My Commission Expires: Page 31 of 40 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION INSERT LEGAL L Page 32 of 40 EXHIBIT B COMMON ELEMENTS Page 33 of 40 EXHIBIT C LEASED PARKING AREA Page 34 of 40 EXHIBIT D UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE Page 35 of 40 FEYNOTELEGEND AC `inJ lE licl IlD `awJ L .11 R!l AL �uJ�+xJ 10 iJ .a rur 1 I 1 7 7 T I 1 1 1 Y Y 1 I I I I I I I I I III II I I I I 1 I I 1 1 N 1' ;nv' rc'o.� ['ia➢ I I I wu+a I _—" I "'^ II uomr... ' I I 1 1 I I I I a 1 r ' i • ei. meat T . %•G I \ ;-k I' i ; L I j� p ' ' ' I 1 IF i =�.=� �b Q�j a. .�j ...�j a o j, .,�< �j , .�j ,u.� •�ql�j.,.� a.�jo j�l,� �' , . ' ...»..�..,m��,.�,�o� ' I I, -I-�- 1 1 `I``� I, 'I `��'�� I, I I �•I I - ' �� j I BLDG0-FLOOR PLAN-GENERAL NOTESDonomm ml -- ( 1 � I 1 ' FLOOR PLAN-LEGEND \\oam.,I , I n.a ..vq , auuo .ol I wr m r►�o ,,.src�a c. y V. I ! Im• II 1 •», 1 I M� m..l. ce I I , PARKINGlina�. 1 1 - ';•�\\1 ' a I rY 1 1 i I I 1�� t n MIDESIGR 11 \ , 0EVaoPhlEH ' I 1 I I I L 1 ,� j i .a.uY.om.,r.v+vow.no®�ovaarm (��Y CCC999 •mn��va w.sva.nn.�„oa...0 I I I I l i I I I III jl II I I 1 1 u� 1 GARAGE. �@ L FLOOR PIAN ,Iy�o�.uta. � c��"��JJJJ fr' SITENEY PLAN-BLWO AQ.10 HMED tYtlO�ttilaf AY T�r , �1C,'._LII—.•Ij:•;11�Ji...I l.t_I-`I I: 1_L,:11...,;...I1,..:i:_J�I -L-'tl-1.1!'_:'L•• L.:_I:_ •;: : ., - ir1_! ht pl fflc'I?�Jl iIl_�lt' ! r-'.I I JG_dIL 11c!r l r�=11ir ill_.� 1=11�IF 1tEi1 lli-nt_: ifL] - :__li1`...: Ir ffI!-. Il..ill 11=iI�HIH:f-Lf=l�h:!-i =II.) :. 1 1: �� :_ 1;;=IIf- LLII-II"!IIF 'IIF�I .Ii'NJl..:i=-�F II '!_ —:Ir�.I,F!1 3 a 9b taC p -i F: -1 ..:i �1-. Il. f�IHrF 11:�. F= „�,!,-11r_iFi.._n-_I�Jl-['.lk..IL ' f� :_ I.... a r i ... 1 Lt ' I !I„JTrr:�llr�:r_;u-.11 n..rfr=rrr_::. n_: -----------ilL IIII��I ! /, rHiIFT �a SM Ill=JIF1�=I1-- i ? - ! IIL;I�4.�; G �zU _is ,fl if=!i �f� •11T�1 a!JIL_Tl....a lI JW r I ?�lii:!I I i : i�'u1=ITS !•� '� :! � � I TIT i _ u 9 e x ..I]Ecc:.1J"?i i_/ �j:.-J_ -d a": T —�•t �I:F:'I_= —I` IF`-II4'..L':iI'`� Ik ;_] •[E_:[�-��f ='�i l,.vlT.-,.171 't1E:IlE= - k-_:�;�'IIFr-IIG-1il—II 1. f.-":_:� r_•n_-II•-. l: LrmJ. � I'll r l " '� .I•iLi.Frri ° . f L�51 5 01 MM a � 4 )s i Y Nj EXHIBIT E SITE PLAN Page 36 of 40 EXHIBIT F FLOOR PLANS Page 37 of 40 '.-'�'�,'a'l'fAr"�a: cit`l tsl fa 8 ,''+•�' � Q a g G 7 N i i .......... . .. L.:..:�---.:_:`J:.:'.'. _ i ar I , I I I i .I f. .::..:.....:.:.....L,..-,.....,.....L.,,. ........... P I I O'.1 I ij 1 I :! J f' a 'I I I a Hi r : 'J I I: �u •'I .i.. fj _ _.. r,frtttuf3x :•Lr�:,:: ' I•. .: :::::::_;; �;:: , �=r Rj I!I_...-1.. _ �,. ..... . i:: :_•I- ..._..:_,:: t � Ul. : ��d,j,R IT > F- I ! : p ..:..=J�` :.•- ,.. III': I i -- - , :I _ __ C; !I'll, .'ry •I i ,�.. I f i I I I v ,:, ! .. � I I , L_ �r I i : t : A L_ : : I r.�SJ 3 i I 1 r'I: I . •I anarm'uaavux. a�,aa 3 � i ---- � Iiy(Snif,:r. :::.l+ry ai IL I Y LM T T Q Q4 4 1� 4 T. QED Il��, o- '1 • I I I I 1 I � ' • I � I I I G rl7 ' Sol I I � 4 O ' I y , E i • } La TEP I I, I =4• �I� � :Lh'1 4J• dLl� y]A 1 I ��j�' I 'I 1 ����g ° I • 1 I � I 1 � 4 I i I I I I I I 1 1: !I lilt III I ! fill f ilf il!�li l; _—_— i 7,1 TZ I t,,,ti,t,tl•lj�U�"Il,i„+''I••Ip , i ! 1 ll}''i�,�ul}y d`;t li•;hry'!��1.. ::i, ,.•� 1�1`I;tlllti�,';�;tlll'y'y'11~I yl' D „1 !i !t �I t'P •1• 1 t. + t. tt •11 , +, t, t'' I 1 '•1 � Il, I i ::I:; , ,1'!1 '`''i tUl�u;�.l!'•;ylil�,!,1i11',, I Ili,III'+11'``1,1;1 '!!dl�;l''•„lil!`"11 i lyt`!li'`yl t11'•i�l'1'iy+�'�•,1R,1!j�,11����`�, i • .' � " it i i+I I I ' tt ' I I it � I i� .I � I u;l u,•,•,al:'.y,•y�ili.ut�,ll!11!'1;I'���',1�1�`i'• I Innwuuewct muw Irl'�r fm qq P it Rall it 151� '_%lifi{41 a' n FV g Q I � I 4(x'e�Ir:il�G%ixil: o I m 1 o W C I , ED 1 a �lo1i 1 t°r+ 1 -----------_CAI I I I r7 l 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I • 7 I ' rI I t o- L��- -- rt t-- -1-- -�- -- - --- -- -- --- _ 1-1 ---- -;-- - ® o +---I---;I--- --� TT T ED I r I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I � I I I II i I I gyp` ' I 1 I I I I I I ' m¢ao:unwum muad U' V t'JO'1B NVId A3113LS 013AM 10Ma IT, � O � I I 1 . I r wo I I I ® cm 1 EA O-- — ----- - --- O— I I .. IT— _: - -- --- I ---- - —V7 1 I - o - Ll �u a M:_�y=:� oN303131oxA371 a� �, e� r� r11 ail� �• �� �� sF �� � �� ss �- t __ 42 : I I t1-:b F I I 1 I .......... ID J 7 I P pp��YY I: I . . . .. .. :.. _ 1 I I'. "1 -y s�-- :: y F. i'� g 6 }E••' q I �1 Q j q T T' T''•:'i• (•'' 1 I I' I I. 'I 1 I 1 I ' MRLfI,ltNlltRt Q3lG4tl Pim Adlbk ' �3 c _li _.. fi"'fly i rz J_ I��':! •I'i'll� _ •�is- l I -; -_- _j tt i-• r ! Ij N a -- I !;. { Rio; 8 ` • IR r i R I tin bC i�.lR, N�C � FE �31 � i 3 e ev . I 4 3� A�,�� I!� O x e. pF I I$ ? I I I - I II. • i !..�= .. .--- -fl� �K:.�� IyifKiKKi:V+I%T�S✓i� ; — . r.. 01 I ' . : .. F ...I c-� .a—.o- ...... I _ _.I - —•_ _ i•... :•;:' .i.;b;.y �.:__... A:Ltllill`N�!^ •!•I'IO':I ti' "; I- �I' ,t ti Q ..' ;'�. :!,?•.111,E .I....: ::'f�' I +i'I I'I I! F er i I icli I7 — ,I .:5: is � �{' .I;.,: �'-i _ ,I• I Y`I Lill -t—i :_.:._;:.:__._ I .71 "v. I �� :tI:F.If••'.�I �I,'•E'I �I�! ' _I•!.•is —....... •,�1� ,'+�"'ill'!I!� I �I O•I;:'i � ��� .I` _ .GPI,'.• MM • IIVRII:IIIlmlt4l m11Lid Nlbfl[p llPiyl.ltro°9.W 'r , I , o low � oll � J ag° � tl i T p, Ic I r J � Via-'-- ---�--- c� ,� — I•, a 1 4 C C C C C C C � o ® Iva,xa�verue � O m s IN r7P:1:r.1 3ti i�r'•.' W, S a a aQ a a a a 1 Sig 1 •• icy �--- ------I B- ��- I r I- et- d , Q Q Q aa� I I I O i I ? III I I I I ��:• II I I f , t I �7 • i I 1 II a. PWM ,mvnn,,,vn.. Iddilk . Am I I I II 1 1 I i t it l 1 I I I I II 1 i I -- -tom �O ® I m S m � I g ��b,::l,t�;,�;•r�i,, tt. K S,'p S ---- � I: 1 IL --1 . .......... ............. 12 3 - ; r ' ;rlr'rr ili II I I'I �I III��I I I i I I Jill -Q If �ilr�rj!rrr1 r'!'!!ri :l �lush/, , l o-�----- i!�j ri(lr!��+ 7lf',� , will1J ; rl;(I !J I1? , i I+IJ IIj1 llllil I i J' rllr'j� r !jf!ry!jJrf J',!,r!►!'!!�I jr�j��rl�J,),! �J1J!j1,!!I jll I jl�� I;�II;I ,;II '�,II I I --- l1 Ili PWMD Im1DOlt PMw :1 I I .. F L..I -1 -6 41 t•.:.;is-:: ...j... - <d'; �. j I � � I 5 r i_ j5 'cj --,� Fll _ I f •I. ............... t- + I Al I TT - -�- ----�-- j y m I O S I Is Lp 7x 8 �• Fh 'rl�,,,�(, Yff t' KEYROTELEGERD G�vma : �. _.._ • r.'r tort {{'--'--�� ..(• 1 ...... :: �1 . 7. I -L�........... - -' t 1 h. I AtNM�]-GRflF'AId1 • _� �, -..��� -- � 11�.•r .1�1:� 1 i _ ERAR FIKISR satEou�E ExT I: ._.___ �i•:;�27 r.,{i 9 �::. .— _. "a�'-'.:3dFl:•;-= '���i.' l�j-•� 1: 42.tti 31P!i'�I W T HA70 .{ .e:11E11 Qj'lA19Y ._..._—_........._- FDA una°� OPNZNT ........... -= oEYEL ................ ; ------- .'i VV Y 4 I 'l..—._.......---- . ;— .i. ;j:j _L:h cam'I �------�-���.,•..,-•_':-;_; y -- I w - �� '-i»•: �; .._. � of .pt. �! I I .k , BIGG 7 EN Tr _ .. _ ._..-�:..:r.,-�._-___ '-._- � .!•J::n _ _ _ - _ •__ _ ___ -_ -_�'�-';'tom' _ _ �.:.e....�.�-:�-• _- nZrQs � -'"ti��1 EXTERIOR e r - - - EEY0. r ; e. F - t... A tj-a0rP1i*Aan.ml _ I�aOOeiZ.V,,InmAey .____...._....:..... SfIEKEYPIAN-BL000 A3r21 I I I I I I S' I Now p 9- 1:::' JLL I b b o o b o b IED .a anuo - I ---CI JI i 1 � I p 1QP5- E7,7L - h slL 6 vil - C r r ti e ® XO MUAAI[ it F I I I 1 � I I 1 , Nil C -4jr t ll - I I I to I I I } Q O O Q Q Q I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I o-------- -- - -- - --- I ---- 8� I I I I 1 I • 111fLlLll ltOplfR1 Q]IIRN KEYMDTELEGENO I I I I ' I —I I I 1 Ij 1 I I ® — --- -- ----- — i RiiE- conwimm �VA I - ! p a � I I Oar I V I SG%OESIGN , , r 1n1 ( DEYELOPM I ! I I a BLOG3- LEYE17 .F„��,s Irma-vm[cemcunwul ® CC ® SREMYPLAM•BLDG3 A3.13 ''L�iril„', f9:L..sR�� $• ., d'� 5{�i P � � Q lI. IN �1 Mi Q 4 0 0 4 Q q i , I , 6 ....;.....,., 6 5 Fn P■ __ 35i I R i..• FEW- 77 ® -- -- i =7-=' 11=77, ' I I , I I I I i r � I , t 1 In�LInlcVbiLn 4u" r Now L •r:�'_ ' �. 1:...'y� 'Pi 6..1'-"Ci•:"'I -1--- I O .i-I -- -—;---QQ I I 6 x S ---I III I I I I--• " - —Q F LW �_ !- � 77-11 -I; __i _'.� � ��' � -- ! l i I is r� "—�' —•Fy,`' I dT IE I �.. � ! �� i I III ; .;•:�:,..: ;.�\ i -� I =.I.° I � .c.,.�l I 'x I I fl I MR - b F 7 i e 1 I � I , �! o _�,yM CH tit1�%Ri'+fiHI:' L 0-1 L �J4I.7�1'�i f9 i j s+3 a A E g i a � I ll' qaq ED Q QQ Q ® Q QQ Q O '�1 I I I I I �•_� ------------ il4 n _ '' P Y-1 a I —u 1• I I I 11 11 I _— ! I I I 4 1 .......... ' "�-- — � P17 9 •!,1 I � I L 1 II I 1 pl�rn�V' I a I .... I . 1(IfI.fllllloUH![l Q{Ilyd PMM Adilk Adilk —-—-—-—- -—- QD HIP ---L --------- - I M- Salt �e ---------- r--m all-IL—L-JW ------------ ON - a Q O f� jai 1 W, I � 1 FL T T T T° q LET I I I I I Y. I I I ayI Yet, a ! J , I I7 4 I --1- �. e I --- —';� --I- 6 I t � I I I InK I:tt1iELILCI p�.,ye P�6'!!ED uYiMullyr]cw - i O� i Ak --- _...........-------.--. , ........... I ............--... _-- ---- _--- ----- I tia ! N I XEYNOTE LEGEND , i _ -- — 1 _ �a —e _ ,:. — —— •'is .I. J j �•y 2 - A t i ! I i — _ Y I , 1 � 1 - T-. _Its n - — :. — � 1 Hma E%TERIOR FINISH SgiFOUlE HUM I A a:::.. i,�..-,...- `,I::•" n:..r. :,--__,., ..` ••_.�. _ . .44 1 _ .. r if it �• � I :.._.... .� ,::.:.. `- -- �.;. .:I:. :'i �is�i:' , .I'.1_ L.i.: I..:.•r...:�!:.::-� .[:. . ooTmlmvao �-•'a i 1;?: r ��:i.:;;- -_ � _.-:>±�:. DEVELOP _..._ �'+ + pq - 5 +4`l rN- / I --art T , — — _ �Mx. EXTERNM ELEVAMNS : I . I- i;.f ,InooY�neAv tvY _—.-_ 'I ;.���"• SDENEYPUN•DLM4 A4.21 IAVIFD llQNfII,C,C]llll � I I ! ! =11H jll> I:_I.k ICI -.,;;-y -�- ,• � l..'" L,.-..-,III I i I it. I ' :I fl:.;'j'_ - _u -ram- - I , I C I I I S° I II i I 1�jyL � 2 `r; 6 1 I t "... {�J 3 �I rtl I i :u ED Ll ED ED -- f I I I - I i I C� xrm�:u.tww21 v311gw � zY 3a �� x ;�iL_`jR�,1l`r'L`.�,.'•�_�1`'� ?[F.tt�±_�I.13ey'�I`�1!^jj:-7"t±r[���j'-t> j'is �.�. i" _ i I i i i wr ---- DDnDmym .In wner.mw •a, tOilpooma M OCtONtlffHi4 4Ld4 C'4 sox oEs- � I y EX7ERION ELEVATIONS ,Lrs�azv.mw tty_=prs.werr.rtw SRE KEY MAN•BL005 Q5,21 0 -1 di� q 0 � I •` i I 1 i5 s vl 1— ru 4� t ' :11 T ............. .� ' .. IT � I J��{I 0 I f 'LI --6 I I _�._ I I I I ���-� C4 i r ;I -�-- -----�- I ---- Ing- m I e l a l T�J,; I lit I I I li i --------------- I II ,- I. I> I I I I I I I I I 4 Q Q I I 1 1 I I I I I I I - 1 V -- I •�1� y1= �.;.: :`tl i'. - III II , I -------- I I 1 1 4 - r i. l I i o--- - , - - --- - - --- - - --- -,t;,I ----- li s� ! I 1 I ' I• w I I I I I li it I I I I I ! I : I 1 I � I I I I 6 I I I I I I I I ( I I l I I I I I O I I I I Ask ED --—-—- lie IO O •O 10 j I I I I I O• I 1 I I 1 1 13 I i �� � I i I �• I 1 I I o 1 0 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 C C o O 0 Z 2 � m p I Ell ,��FrIF•}itr7 y-' r.: KEYNOiELEGEND i •�g M O ID IE ID 1 -- 4`A -- --- -----�� � =- I I II I i I I , I I I ---- --- — — ----- -- -- - ---'---0 ---- ail-----�--�---- ----�-� - 1 • I + p' _ I O -------7- i I O ------ -- - -- - ---- ----- o --- ' ------ I -----I r •� i Lmo I V SDS DESIGN — � I I I I � I I � DEVELOP I I I I I =nl't•"= ..a I I I a� Q ��- ED SITE KEY PLAN•BM 6 A6.13 KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 I Y Y o ----- - �_: -- -----o comm000 I--''���:: ��;.I:��`:::.��-�, �- : �:��j:'.;� .;:::�:•:;.- •. ;.1, I�rrH l�::•y:::::r.�• EYFIDPY I J I a ... LU ER" f�r::i•�IUR ® �r—� ROOF SGEKV PLAN•GLOG6 A6.14 a F2 e ayti60 t�i mi @ JR I I I i l I --- I — -- >r — . — _ — _....._...__._._..__.._......._.._......._._.....1.. _ ; : f- i _...__...._......__ i .......,_ is � :. ....._._.._... : , i : Id l lii 1 74 I�,,flll 111'lGflAI IIWW[I Q3lWMd Vg11FD tIIf1R.,111.)!IL • II ': I L. i I t ! �• I I I , � -- — ----- ------ '-� L------ - 1 II 1111IF1 g I it .. :. .. lu- c.. Ly .. -• r - - I O ¢ ¢ i 9!4i4-5 f m s I I 1 m • o 7..,hrnNi�. c r 9 413 IN,,]' BI r jya e II a3fi.s1s� EXHIBIT G CERTIFICATE OF ARCHITECT The undersigned, being a duly registered professional architect in the State of Montana, herewith certifies the following: That the floor plans, for the IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM situated according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County,Montana,as duly filed with the Declaration and Bylaws thereof,fully and accurately depict the layout, location, Unit Designation and dimensions as built of the IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM and that such floor plans are an accurate copy of the plans filed with and approved by the officials and officers of the City of Bozeman having jurisdiction to issue building plans. Such floor plans rend-.r hand representation of the actual building. Dated: (Name) Registered Professional Architect Number: Page 38 of 40 EXHIBIT H CERTIFICATE OF NAME The undersigned being the duly authorized agent of the Department of Revenue of the State of Montana within the County of Gallatin,herewith executes the following certificate relating to the IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDIMINIUM situated as follows: INSERT LEGAL 1. That the name IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM is not the same as, similar to or pronounced the same as a word in the name of any other property or subdivision within Gallatin County, except for the word"Condominium", and 2. All taxes and assessments due and payable for the said IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM have been paid to date. Dated: County Assessor Page 39 of 40 EXHIBIT I STORM WATER MAINTENANCE PLAN 9 Ci I ' Page 40 of 40 "' ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF AND FOR IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. A MONTANA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: I, the undersigned, pursuant to Title 35, Chapter 2, Montana Code Annotated, acting as incorporator of a corporation under the Montana Non-Profit Corporation Act, Section 35-2-113 et.seq., MCA, do hereby adopt the.following Articles of Incorporation for such corporation: I. That the name of the corporation is: IDA AND COTTONWOOD CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. II. That the period of its duration is perpetual. III. . That the purposes for which said corporation is formed are as follows, to wit: (a) To carry out and conduct all corporate powers enumerated in the Montana Non-profit Corporation Act, as the same exists from time to time; (b) To carry out and conduct the business of a homeowners association, IV. That the name and address (physical and mailing) of the corporation's initial registered agent is HOLLY MARCH SUMMERS at 517 S. 22"d Avenue, Suite 1, Bozeman, MT 59718. V. That pursuant to §35-2-126, MCA, this corporation shall be designated a mutual benefit corporation. VI. That this corporation shall have members. VI I. That the distribution of assets upon dissolution of this. corporation shall be consistent with the provisions of§35-2-721, MCA. VI II. That the provisions for the regulation of the internal affairs of this corporation are set forth in the By-laws of the corporation, and if not set forth therein, shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Montana, as the same exist from time to time. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and seal this day of , 2019. HOLLY MARCH SUMMERS, Registered-Agent and Incorporator STATE OF MONTANA ) ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2019, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared HOLLY MARCH SUMMERS, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal as of the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana (Seal) Residing at: My Commission Expires: -2. -