Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300220700246207) -- Zoning Preliminary Flan. YUb." r - -- 5371 Baxter Lane C&H Engineering and Surveying a June 4, 2003 IV ICD W N L , 0 FILE.REVIEW SHEET ZONING PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD File Name: 6 �File No.: Reference Files: 0acq 0aDZ 1�_ DATE DATE DONE DUE DONE BY DRC initial week review (p at{ (p DRC second week review DRC final week review `� 7 DRB Staff Report due 17 -7( DRB Meeting Notice to paper (not <15 or >45 days prior to CC) /I 1 I -7 Notice to Adjoiners (not <10 days prior to final DRC) ('Ool Post notice (not <10 days prior to final DRC) <o Staff Report to City Commission City Commission work session �--� City Commission hearing "l t I4K m Approval letter mailed to Applicant Improvements Agreement mailed to Applicant approved approved w/ conds denied date DRC Action 5+0 O �?LF CC Action C . 00 671 DRB Action N`o 0-x-,-DnW,- /1 Final Site Plan due by: Improvements Agreement returned: Final Site Plan approved on: Financial Guarantee received on: Financial Guarantee released on: Date of Temporary Occupancy: Date of Final Occupancy: PROJECT ACTIVITY LOG CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COINIMUNITY DEVELOPNIENT PROJECT NAIME: ILE NO.: - a DATE ACTIVITY STAFF ST_UF CUI.WUL. PERSON I HOURS ( HOURS A --v ILA !� 'El' D —. \14a s �5 f\p ' 4 q. Igo no C-c�, rn ' 1 a i I i 1 FILE REVIEW FOR COMPLETENESS B IF COMPLETE, GIVE TO CAROL F FILE. IF- INCOMPLETE, WRITE/CONTACT APPLICANT AND EXPLAIN WHY BY: To DRC: G2 7 1 S To DRB: DRB Report due: �3 To Planning Board: Planning Board Report due: r' To Zoning Conunission: Zoning Commission Report due: To City Commission: City Commission packet due:_ /3 City Commission Work Session: Notice to Paper /7 for 7 W publication Notice to Adjoiners/Post: 07_ SURVEY REQUESTED OWNERS PLA T ®F CREATE 99 TOWNHOUSE SINGLE LOTS, 1 SINGLE FAMILY LOT AND 2 8-PLEX LOTS. OWNERS: CAW, L.L.C. BAXTER SQUARE P.U.D. SUBDIVISION BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS, L.L.C. LOCATED IN THE E 112, SW 114 AND THE W 112, SE 114 OF SECTION 35, T. 1 S., R. 5 E. E o J Z OF P.M.M.z_-_GALLA TIN COUNT', -MONTANA -- a � cD 0..vim c ChEr:=T'D Ro.ao ,a c--E M Z it?,. - - - - - 0 _ fn Q 0."�z 9 s37 BRACT A o 4 N m 20, Zr- : =3 "nos No. 500 a I, m : ', Q �.lRlld W. Goworskino y O � CD O M. Goworski 3 fn 1 (0 -ti 64 Fm 269 3 R . 7 O� CD Ma "O [N89-18'00"E] n < 0 oasrye'oa" +I 10, Utility Easement 330.89(R) W _. ea1.7a 330.89(R) C S ACE �; SW 1 4, Sec. 35_ _ _ ____ __ _...- -- - ---- - - - -- - - -- - -- - �'0�p 3A33 line o -- 60.00 45.75 35.00 135.00 I� 35.00 31.00 26.00 31.00 31.00 r6.00 77.51 �T- f-1 T \ c OPEN" -q�-_-I - G StrP�et��- , is LOT 1 201 30 .48-089i7'2 V�� N N rr1 W N I^ O o1 tD o N Q Y g $^ y N y v; N 10' Utility Easement ' b, a^b,I,�DI 391•Sv 5 1 0 o�T�3 v L 35_.0 0N 8 22.e0N.,0.i i1I aaq 1 l _B..r_u-ce W. Campbell _e_l_l o � n rt N 8L 203 Fm 33270T33,465.F. 16943 sq it $ LO89.4 18 8 8 oPS N3 INPHA� 8?'1 8 '6 146.00 3.e93i.o0 46 30 --775 [17-Do of J j. TI - �'r.•o.,. : . od; m m ai m va 0o r�. o LO ,/ � ' n'� N� N � � �I� NI "' y; ;T, 3.627 sq it 3,129 S.F. r "; r r f r ! x '^ z o .. .� � i v� � 11 117.00$"17 I j $ LOT 5 89. r r I r- ',d Y� � I o � 3042 sq -+-10' Utilil Easement dre Z'�' °Dro °a °oaD N r. Andrew Van Crden a N J OI J e7 O J N 7,J - $ I LOT 1Debbie L. van .Crden e,"J`j _ r-I-n -a e sq75 Fm 656 3,128 F StretI (FU IIURE)I nLOT 9 1 . 5.00 35.00 22.00 35.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 26.00!, 77.51 7 I 3.627 sq it TRACT C-t LOT 7 8M7$ > -39527-099'18.00'-- w -]-- - -- _ _-- - -- -7 3,128 S.F.89.35M1 e ------ BLOCK: 3 0 g I 3,LOT 8 ft17.00 Q- i I I COS NO. 1827 8 LOT 8-r8 m Nn / n sq SO 45' wide Private Road and C g LOT 7 117.00 1,965 S.F.89 33 �- Public Utility Easement (Typ.) o LOT o- ,� 3,042 sq it _N LOT i 10' Utility Easement- 1,964 S.R. \ �$ o b PUBLIC PARK 1 1 01 8 LOT 6 117.00 is Y4 M ui 3,042 s ft a. Andrew Von Orden LOT 10. \� I � 98,409 sq it I�-y"r, r`+ _..q_ Elizabeth Hager q"� 2.2592 acres 1 $ LOT 5 117.00�, 159 Fm 1588 LOT 1186.24T7r•N Na a Wetland Area: 22,380 Sq Ft I�n 3,627 sq ft 2,958 S.F. I DN n� Private Rood Easement: 9,465 Sq Ft $ LOT 4 1n.ao �o tO m Storm Water Drainage: 2,690 Sq Ft a I 3,627 s it �i -"- --- "'- T-�- o &I LOT 12`52. a 8 /` N ^_ q 1,798 S.F.h? $ LOT 3 117.60 hl �----- z i $ L0 �cN ,�� I N 13,042 sq it ,612,39I S.F.30.07� 0 1 N/ $ OT 2 117.00 _p=0418 a 45' wide Private Road and M e 3,042 sq ft iD 'fin r°'v LOT 4 j 7 .08 08917'2 a---- ��', Public Utility Easement(Typ.) N) _- ^ o LOT 14 Mo zs.s$ LOT 1 117.0 ESOP Richard L. Miner I I I a,7LO s it $ Larilyn L. Miller W. 4,425 S.F. . or) N� LO' wide Utilit Easement�Typ�- - L_ q 34 Fm 1575 �7 1n o L- -------- < ---- w. v 'ten ,�6' --- 4�530--- 7- -------- --{-- o 4, 9.00 269-17.O9" n 269.17-OT 522.50 _ $ o Sartain Street - $1 a (Dedicated this plat) $ _- 300.43 089'17'09" 301.03 089'i7'09" - - 94.93 _-�20 7� M.7� �0,0 1.00 1Ao 26A�56.03 .y -1�•�- Ronald K. Lewis 7 n JS' Utility Easement �- 0 1 0 0 _ 1 LOT 5 ... Janice E. Lewis PU LIC o LOT 22 n LOT 1 ,ab, °' n 1 17 Fm 724 PPA 2 "tea / 6,336 sGy it I ,+ 4,738 sq ft 60 lord °' °'., ino` I Larilyn L. Millar I'eJ 121.03 26917'09" 90.71 269'17'0�" oW m^_ ny oo H rn H 1 H. Gwendolyn Swonby F+ a I ���3 Y 1 LOT 21 LOT 2 y, 1, �n$ ov r r oo�0 0 o I' 8-PLEX 10 93 Fm 36as 3 m e 126.8 2,770 s ft "' "' =° a J6, o< o a of N I a 4 LOT 11 o I I I m FI 2,022 s it 1 „jv - -+m J a vi n o ,ii ri a' : 17.198 sq it LOT 20 N 93.14 LOT 3 5 >„001 � I ��? 1�f3I92 3,452 sq ft Jo r^y 2,555 sq ft n 4U00- �O 1'00 b0 56.Od `- -- - --. ._ v to N z n 1 LOT 19 // N 96.t 1 LOT 4 �1 g i,= L '- CiK} 10' Utility Eosemerlt I n o U h 4,561 sq ft rr1 n a� ,� C rn I n N to cQ �+ J 1 M 3.431 s ft 131.70 q N a �r f? �"P• 1 O � ��tr I � 117.0o zss'17•os" _ �, ro��8to LOT 18 0 99.97 LOT 5 r °n c o; o d-P�" of$ I LOT 12 o LO b i I I 1 xm 4�4,025 sq it n 3,005 sq it �_ ^� 0„1 3,627 sq it �i James D. Secor a rp1' ' I o Bonnie L. Secor I aTJ da 30 636.19`OT 17 0100.39 LOT 6 te "6` '^ r 16 .+� oo LOT 13 117.00 4 Fm 777 I Ld (p 4 a 1 °T?�yB. 4,107 sq it n 3,018 sq fi q - = - -55.97 N 1 3,042 sq it [° M 13 .98 t00.81 ��� 040.00 1.00 31.00 26.00 n 48.26 $ 1117.00 269'17'0" ro LOT 16 o LOT 7 135.71 `114po�l�.� N 4.751 sq it M101.5�'S39 sq ft m �$24,43E1L S P.Et- _ 'cJ LOT 14 a - 8O ft cn 1�1�1113-�4.32 e w LOT 8 3S Q N v "�- 33' wide Private Road and n 111 - 4714 q ft I 3,533 sq do°J ��1 �1 it doh LOT 15 289 8?00' 10 Utility Easement Public Utility Easement v 135.04 100.68o k 10,098 sq it Ml c [589ry6'o0"W] S LOT 14 3 LOT 9d,0r152 089-16'OO" 130.88 v 21 2,976 sq it 2220 s ft 4 AN vp 22.25 LOT 16 S LOT 7 ��LOT 13 $tot.z5 4e Jo l n,o ?0 5a1T33'00 2,842 5 it N Brenda L. Burden 0 4.074 sq ft $ 3,066 s0it °6>r o t$rn o T2.43 ,11• LOT 17127.31 c w' I 2024132 $ •o -0-Q .OT34 2,752s ft > 5 o^ 1136.12 26717'09' I 103.15 269'17'%9.19 p \• 122.72o a- I 2• 2\1 LOT18 I LOT 12 I LOT 11 0302�4 -'� �o� u. A � � 3,228 sq It m N I 91992 sq it I 1 '� 7,888 sq 114$ \A SLOT 19116.55� r N89-17.09-E 1+ °S` rn 13 ti5 a L[ )- -----�6• Nv tl OS\ 3.523s ft ^' a q ; q 133 Fm 130 x 01.4769N 11104 269'17'09'?� mw w,h? \ OT 20111.07p j LJ 80.85 Y 168.82 v .,a ro A Ox403 843 sq It WN QU -� "P zro ^`6� OB bi OT 21107.836 o_ N Hoover Street >o 39 o ^ O o p 07 2,775 sq It m Q4 J _ N[ o o, LOT 22 iO5.B2Bka W w N m e m6i I o- i s 3,263 sq It a a0 cn N d o �°o_" o LOT 23 105.019 n Y 2 w Se- rn 3,255 sq ft r `� 7 tN <�b pI f �� a- m `�' S LOT 24 t 5 of A a m 'o to ,--• `�''. N 2,730 sq it Y C2on N s rI o0i 2 S LOT 25 10.01$ p J o �-' a t✓ �u, N 2,730 sq It bb M C m �� c �§ 105.01 d I , S LOT 26 --L� Bozeman Conyreyution o1 N R " LOT 23 E . J 3,255 sq it 10' Utility Easement 0 d n v M ri m Jehovah's Witnesses 1 m = n 57,120 sq It v 1 N o o " 200 Fm 4463 I m o- n 1.3113 Acres w I LOT 27 105.01 N1 c n 3,255 sq it n < a LOT 28 105.1l x 'I a v c1OJ Z730 sq ft LOT 29 105.01 2,730 sq fi David Osteer, Sr. vim,¢3 Ru'h Gsteen J� tos.ol crs1s'o 21212 I I, 60 LOT 30 Fern 17,✓P. 1595 Proi L J1 I F 5,3 5 sq it 120 i 30 - R -----177.52 330.80 08916'od' 105.01 08T16'00" J ii -------------------I- - --------- _____ ------ --- ---------- fi t i - - 7 O $ n Baxter Lane 1' No Access Strip r0i 165.26 _ 330.52 rn A - -"- - -/r'._o_fSW - 495.78 S 1/4 Car. Sec. 35� - - -- -- -"- 495.78 C 0 269'16'00" 0 269ry M M M 1/4, Sec. 35 ]Y Existing 60' wide County Road Right of Way Easement. LEGEND (R) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH (M) MEASURED DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH • FOUND 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H #9518ES) AREA TAB U LATI O N O SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH Scale /n Feet PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H #9518ES) AREA OF LOTS - 470,461 SQ FT 10.8003 ACRES ea 0 60 AREA OF PARK = 92,961 SO FT 2.1341 ACRES Ifi 0 18 x�CX� WETLANDS AREA OF OPEN SPACE = 88,364 SO FT 2.0285 ACRES Scale /n Meters AREA OF DEDICATED STREETS = 137.555 SO FT 3.1578 ACRES WETLAND CREATION AREA TOTAL AREA = 789,341 SO FT 18.1207 ACRES DISTURBED WETLANDS r BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH: X Engineering and Surveying Inc. [N4500'00"E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM AZIMUTH SHOWN 205 roell Crlve,Bozeman,Monona 6B7rB Phone 1,105151217-11 115.11,14asl 5117a1118 SHEET 1 O F 2 02395 M J wwwtchengineen.cam•into®chenglneere,com [ Y SURVEY REQUESTED OWNERS FINAL PLAN OF CREATE 99 TOWNHOUSE SINGLE LOTS, 1 SINGLE FAMILY LOT AND 2 8-PLEX LOTS. OWNERS: CAVD, L.L.C. SAX TER SQUARE Pt.U.D. SUBDIVISION BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS, L.L.C. LOCATED IN THE E 112, SW 114 AND THE W 112, SE 114 OF SECTION 35, T. 1 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA LEGEND -SS---- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. —'W PROPOSED WATER MAIN t PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED WATER VALVE RACT d 0° PROPOSED STOP AND/OR STREET NAME SIGN - CU5 N0. 500 - 1_—_ _---- --�` PHASE LINE — --- -- --- -- - -- - ----_. '�- PROPERTY LINE DEDICATED ROAD I LZ�C��d EXISTING WETLANDS V i I WETLAND CREATION AREA �1 TRACT A g E DISTURBED WETLANDS COS No, 500 0 2 1 David W. Gaworski I I M. Carol Gawbrski ZONED AS d= ZONED RS BUILDING SETBACK LINE F 269 (County) — —— — EASEMENT LINE 10' 1I tility Easement 330.89(R) N line of SE 1/A, SW 1 4. Sec- 35 -- FENCE 330.89(R) t C rPEO Nr*SPACEflfl 5: LOT 1 6 [� o a U I Bruce W. Campbell 10' Utility Easement LOT 1 a N N °' � i $ 203 Fm 3322 �� o 0 0 _ o EDGE�, qR� O J I I III S11rucl ROAD BER1q(TO 81'RF M0�0� 1_O7 2 TRACT IIC-1 —�` LOT o o 0 0 0 0 „ COS NO. )827 Et?G L —10' Utility Easement LOT 2 aBc ( P P, Andrew On Orden Eq LOT 10 I Debbie L. `Jon Orden _ _ _ 75 Fm 656 Y w�` LO L RAGE L LOT 8 ®T o LOT 8 w e Privdl a W u t seme Typ.) LOT 7 Y Z& LOT 9 3 , i . i,w LOT 3 10' ility Easeme k / i _ UB F K _ 6 O -1.Andrew Van Orden LOT 1Q � � � �i� �I /�,-�`" _ r" Elizabeth Hager 159 Fm 1588 -PH14 ® LOT 5 0 0 0 LOT 1 LOT 4 —_ �•._ o` -o VV - 0 20" SET rl/ 1 I 45' id mate Road and - - w 1 1 I _0 12 t� , W Public lility Easement{TyP LOT 13 I �1i 1 j Z LOT 2 I --1 4 18.5' S ACK LOT 1 UW Richard L. Miller LOT 4 I SNOW RAGE — —— 26 I Lo4yn L. Miller L — -j I L10' wide Utility Eas—ant (Tyg W-STORA rgggCyt t 34 Fnl ts76 6`A -- - T - Ronald K. Lewis 1 ' ility ' SET F K F o p as wide Rood and �� Janice E. Lewis .P. LC o ° ° ua q Bo.a.nt LOT rj 17 F PA m 724 �� I LOT 22 �i� LOT 1 - I�g /, K 2 } z s M1t o � o o �,5• c I Lorilyn L. Miller r _ C rn H. Gwendolyn Swanby =g T 21 I L01 2 OT 1 3 Fm 3646 ei LOT 20 W �. Y f7 Easemell Z 5 LOT 19 LOT 4 13 Ef K LOT 18 � LOT LOT 6 James D. Secor K Bonnie L. Secor LG 1 Go LOT ( O OT 1 74 Fm 777 1 LO 16 N LOT 7 - P - `) LO 4 I+1 ILbI us el n 10' Utility sement 33'wide Private Road and � 8 Y LOT 1 v � Public Utility Easement I I L 15 U I `o LOT LOT 9 o c LOT 7 LOT 10 LOT 16 In Brenda L. Burden 133 Fm 43D _ LOT ao a? o i 2024132 LOT 17 w 3T wide Private Road and I ; �NED 'RS LOT 12 I L 11 LO I m unt) o I a ter- - - - Public Utility Easement LOT 19 n a' / Ld - - LOT 20 U < NOW ST GE Hoover Strcc�i I - L C BO LOT 22 N GUY WP E IP, ONED R— Y N ri (City) LOT 23 a cc 2 I� EHOUSE^ I ILK LOT 25 OUSE Si m �- ;.OT 26 Bozeman C. gregation LOT 23 E 10' U lity E e t I� H Jehov 's Witnesses Scale In Feet ° O' _ I Fm 4463 60 0 60 `` t GARAGEAP= LOT 27 Y a 18 0 18 I �t� „ - LOT 28 WELL Scale In Meters l DElE na"POND yy ' 24'ff MID DEPTH).1.5'PDEEP - S:1 SIDE SLOPE ^p L DOvi GSte 5 T.D.P.',"-4"I00 R th teen B.o P.ELEV=4G99' + _ LOT 30 I = Film 17 1021 7595 Plot ' • c TS � REFLECTORIZED FLEXIBLE DELI EATORS(TYP.) LE t 55 �REFLECTORIZED FLEXIBLE DELINEAlORS(ttP.) BACK -I / U POWER MLEI ANo \ _ fi5.26 � • --U G GAS• / ,�2� 1 � EDGE OF E!(IS11NC PAVEMEM REPLACE EXIST 36'CSP as§y L=OF 36 RCPw rE s Existing 60' wide County Road Right of Way Easement S line of SW 1/4, Sec. 35 U Q cV C�a--_m I Engineeer?ng and Surveying Inc. 205 Edehveias 0*0•Bozeman.Montane 59718 - Prune(40Ej 5B74 15•F-t4D61597•B7B9 www.chengtna m.mm•irdo@chengineem-cam DATE PREPARED: 1 1 30 04 T e� CA W M 0 Z 1 5 :✓r^,hR's 1 d s.:dT"'sz>E'' 'T,. IW _ Ch Zy o' O LINE OF 50'57REAn SETBACK- __ - �_ A5 A i IS III ny II _ III IIII I T TII � IIII Sr III H"r QQ _ —� ` --� �—�aw°°`� --_:— LC r S'T T iS LEVARD /' 5 51D.WALK b 13' l aI! DETENTION FIND � .le L . 1 ,' �.°.�1 � � � j�'�� —�,,.' + - II I. L I I � .•\w wy*w c = r - �¢ AAi 0 4'SIDEWdLK-, r I I� Ig EaSEn T / � � p �ry3 Ili III I + (I I I I i.. `COVERED PICNIC AR4 I 1 \ III ;. I III II.I�I I- IIII t OT14 TABLES AND 2 � j - II V SIDEWALK lj S>h II i'Il fn BOULEVARD BUCIZRAKE AVENUE -T- I . I — _ ,11 � 1 I I � � � I M ' L . . ' ,u •,� , I LL W� 4 SIDEWAL H eoe / LINE I SETBACK J 9'tirP� /� \ � -EaVE LINE TYP rwlc------L�/ �-PROPERTY LME TTP. EUILDLMG LME TYP. BEi eacK rr. --PATIO/DECK TYP. j� IRUSS\ELL STREET a's1oeWALK I t I I ' N��I �L � ° I� I III s r� ' II• 'p i q#.t' i' IIII t- + II 9 = �:y'�1 l g B� I 14 LANDSCAPE LEGEND LANDSCAPE LEGEND //7T I 1</ a6 BOTANICAL PLANTED MATURE BOTANICAL PLANTED MATURE -- _ _ _ _ - { �' _ �_ "# y -I L _ — _ _ _ _ SYM. QTY. COMMON NAME NAME HEIGHT HEIGHT BTM' QTY. COMMON NAME NAME HEIGHT NE KaH7 1—.15 AMERICANA 1-IR"O.8181 1 I-IR"C.(B+BI 33 AMERICAN ASN 'PATMCRE' 12' 60'_TO w 9 AMUR CHCKECHERRT PRWUS MAACKI 12 WERCUS MALROCARPA 1-0"C.(B1B) FRAXINUS PEWSYLVANICA 1.1.'G BIB) 12 BUR OAK 12, 40'-60' 10 GREEN A- VAR.LANGEOLATA p1 50'•60' IB HONEY LOCUST GLEDESTIA TMACM7406 II C.(BIB) 36, f Y 4 6 AMl1R MAPLE ACER GNNALA (BIB) 20, INERMI5'5KYLINE:' 12' �IV,>�`f S' WEST PIP I-IR"G BIB) LWIPERUS 6ABINa �7 I T E I—L AN 7,1 76 EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH SOREI AUCUPARIA 40' 25 BIIFPALO JUNIPER 5 GAL 3'-5'SPREAD 12' BUFFALO" SOUTH NORTH Ij %A1` 5 COL-0 PICEA PUNCaENb -I 6�_0�� 60�-�� tiS a�lf 14 CURR4Ni RIBE6 ALPINUM 12" V-5' r 1F� BLUE SPRUCE LANDSCAPE NOTES- E45T L^u1 15 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA SPIREA I PONICA 2 GAL 2' I.PROVIDE SOD FOR SITE EXCLUDNG PARKING,SIDEWALKS AND PLANTERS.PROVIDE - 55 QUAKING AS°'EN POPULUS TREMULOIDES -IR"C. 35'-40' "LITTLE PRINCESS" I6-20.0 FERTILIZER AT 10 CBS.PER 1000.11 FEET. `) 2' 26 FROEBEL SPIREA SPIRAEA X II "'MD IS"IB" 3'-5' 2.ALL PLANTS AND LAWN TO BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR(I WINTER). -FROEBELII" fJ� T O HIGHLAND POPLAR P'OPIILUS"HIGHLAND" - 1-IR"C. 45' 15 GOLDFLAME 6PIREA 5PIRAEA X EUIMALDA I GAL 3' 3.PROVIDE ALL FINISH GRADING WITH 6"MIN.TOPSOIL THROYaNOUT. I�.e-YAI qq N 12' "GOLDFLAME" kp _ 4.PROVIDE UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC 5PRIWCLER SYSTEM TIAROUGHOUT Z �W I LOT OWNER PROVIDED-CURRENT LANDSCAPING N LOT AREAS (EXCLUDING PRIVATE LOT AREAS)WITH DRIP SYSTEM AT PLANING AREAS. Na FOR DE56N PURPOSES ONLY '"1 PIP A Alf PA W M N � O O a e*c* �. ;r kf4 P ' �° •. .3$°.�fit° n.�.�r. �r°, :. � � ��•�:�..�:,� . . - - - r O \ LINE OF 50,STREAM SEiBAG:�t" • _- � �..' OVER I r��r ��� I �- . r P �.r�7- �--�`� CST T � - ---- - � ❑+ - _ _ lam I i II I l' 1]•— �wl�l �II�I�iF III tl' W <. �❑ .-__ 3-��, - k K O • , ��.r- III I; � '! >. ' 1 111 w - i -a 1 W OL SS N W x -W A mO �--�. rl I i, II,� ij� 11�1;: t I I� 'i' j��� }I I � •'\ iw _ .I ���i I 1 II �I - I N51GN TRIANGLE i y i a w i J Ljl1 ENUE - µ � _� — :_- — - ----•; _ ,, ?! � \-- � _ IIIII�� I �� �,� '� , W BUCKRAR AV_- — I 94 Ile, IL:III 'll : ••, ����y/1I 1r - � ; � �!�; � ; L 1. 1 :1 �� l I I I I L_l_ I. �. -11 — PAR<ING LEGEND PAR<ING LEGEND �_'. — 1 ��' — I C� CLUSTER -OFF STREET OFF STREET CLUSTER GFF STREET OFF STREET (•; ._ ._.— _. _ T RUSSELL STRTET� _ UNIT PARKING REQUIRED PARKNG PROVIDED UNIT I PARKING REWIRED PARKING PROVIDED �. I I 17 17 73 17 U 7 12 17 7A 10 10 I . \, I I✓ 1 I l! I I.: l ^...7 + r„ 3 2 12 75 12 17 4 9 II 76 Id 14 i'k/ � I r — � - � 'nh � i r I i �� N I 4.:� � ✓ 5 6 6 71 a a III �I,11 _ M 11 � � 11 III I �V t 1111I'11 ;1 E II II I. 6 9 5 75 a 9 Ir _ a' S -.._❑ ❑ ❑ •� II ,III j- II I 8 9 9 3m 16 16 I �•I - t � I� t�J III..�{� � � I.I'� «I I '�A.:I I - - - - -J L �- - �- 9 9 9 31 14 14 (1 ; NA �+ 10 Ib Ib 37 a d '�� I. I. I. ••\ -� I. I I� Ir i 11 12 17 33 14 14 •'7 17 17 17 TOTAL OFF STREET 13 17 17 PARKNG REQUIRED 35d 14 16 16 TOTAL OFF STREET 360 15 a 10 PARKING PROVIDED WEST 16 a to TOTAL ON STREET - n 5 5 PARKING PROVIDED 131 f=AFZKINCz/LIC-xI—{TINC= PL,4N SOUTH NORTH A to 9 9 TOTAL STREET - — 19 I0 10 TOTALPAWIW.AT PARK 57 SGALC: I"=Sm'-E9" 20 10 m 21 a a EAST < LA 77 0 8 - </ �• I Z N N PA �� e'o W M LA Z S00 __-___ __-_____--_ "A EXISTING LOCATION OF WETLAND5 LANDSCAPE LECnEND \ ITANICALMATURE GYM. QTY. AGOMMON G cKEc ERRrE Pus NAME AAcal € _ _ 1 .p -_. ... _-. TD Vd 20 25 \ \ \ "LITTLE PRINCESS" I" _ r C. 1zC N 2 LIT';,E PRINCESS SPIRE4 6PIREA JAPONICA S"'O 12" 2 U Z 2 FROEBEL$PIRE4 9PIRdFRCEB5UALDA H"TO 15" 3' � 2 GOLDFLAMf SPIRfA 9PIRdEA k 6!L'7ALDA II TO 15" 3' 1LJ 2 "GCLDFLAME" bi 1`ND ST TLAND6 `--4b30 50.IT,NEW __ GLEDIi51A TRIAOANiH06 I-I/!"C.BIB) HONEY!OGUSi p p WETLAND CREATION T '-ICNEYLOCUST' p' H \ I QJERCU$MAOROC4RPA .�.. b BUR OAK p, 40'•60' 50.FT NEW -V2'C. 401 MOUNTAIN WETLAND CREATION -� \ \ \ _ C_,_ � 11 fUROPEAVMOUNTAINASH 60R5U6 AUGIP4RIA LAY AREAGRGNJD I �-11 1 BLUE SPRUCE DO PICE4 PJNGENS COL Y 1�yM1rP�/ ._.1 w •\\ r � � � /I I � 20 Lh!AKMG ASPEN POPULUS TREMULOIDEB '-I!1"C. 'F w LAND SGAPE NOTES: ` \ \.\,\` .,I-� II Ago®A`Irc�TOZafG' LL I PROP D E-D FOR SITE ExCLVDING PARKING,SIDEWALKa AND RANTERS,PROVIDE 1 \ T 10 LES.PER IOOO—ARE FEET. 2. JARANTEEC FOR ONE YEAR(I WINTER) 4 \ p f` :, •� I ? pROVlpb ALL FINISH GRADING WITH b MIN.TOPSOIL THFOWW(.iJT. 4.PROVIDE WDEWiROUND AUTOMATIC SPRNKLER SYSTEM THROLIGHdIT (EXCLUDING PRIVATE LOT AREAS)WITH DRIP SYSTEM AT PLANTING AREAS. gg \ ' � `•\ \\ .�\` 5.pLANT9'WILL BE MULCHED WITH 4"SHREDDED CEDAR O ' SEEDIN(S NOTES: 1 IRRIGATED LAUN SEED MIX NON-IRRIGATED GRASS SEED MIX 21%PGRK BLUEGRASS 20&SLENDER WHEATGRA56 COVERED PICNIC AREA \ Q� WITH TABLES AND BENCHES .\ 26b COMMON KE D FEBT BLUEGRASS 40+.ASTERN WHE41GRA56 'H`/ 5k CREEPING RED FE5CUE `%THICK SPIKE WHEATGRA55 II 2TY.NELPORT BLUEGRASS 10.SLEEP FESCUE IT+.PERENNIAL RYEGEA55 10%SHER`1AN BIG BLUESTEM MOUNTAIN 5ROME �y i_ Ll I -- i--I ..i - r .... UIETLANDS ry; 1 ` .�- - T EXISTING WETLANDS:SO F FT.NEW IL'ETLANCS:14,124 60.FT,, WETLANDS LANDSCAF-.-AND GRASS SEEDING TO COMPLY WITH US AR Y CORPS OF EN'GINEER5 I ry COMPREHENSIVE ILETLAND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS. lJ NORTH Q SITE LOCATION WEST EAST SCALE: 7 � 0 50U7✓a � N z a /T, BAXTER LANE NORTH S� � LA � I LA WE5T EAST `� N MAR 2 4 2005 G �` L .. _-J N H S 17� LOC,4T I ON souTN _ � � A - 1 A M 7 � 0`b 3 e P Z rA m WNS L/i p e b y oSt a c*., III r.: - ...r ,�. ., , h is ."a'1-_€ •PF.t� zs �'t,°,7 RETENTIaV I r .:..,.. ..... .. .. ...,... .�,7 .. .. ;� ... 4.. '. ;�.... .r �. rJ Ya r :mod, �� . d i II 1`n Ie, LA � a 4) ,•,s� Q la ry .{ t a is ° - �x'c 5. 1) �- ls'Ati X E`w,e,.j-✓ --- a ..LINE Gr 50 STREAM SETBACK c A° " 00 �z 4W1 LPL W — — — � — _ - _ kA S f4f4 PA 4 WEST i SOUT+-4 P��K PL 41V r I _ SOUTH NORTH 40'-60'EAST LANDSGdPE LEGEND FL4NDSG,4f-E LEGEND BOTANICAL PLANTED MATURE BOTANICAL PLANTED MATURE SYM. QTY. COMMON NAME NAME HEIGHT HEIGHT SYM. QTY, COMMON NAME NAME HEIGHT HEIGHT I"TO I-I/4" C. FRAXINUS NIGRA 5 dMUR CHOKECHERRY ?ANUS MAACKII 20'-25, 0 1 FALL GOLD ASH 'FALL GOLD' 12, FRAXINUS PENN5YLVANICA 1-1/2"C. 111r-15 MACROCARPA 1-1/1"C. 40'-60' 10 HONEYLCCUSi HI40'-60' j BUR OGK I1' 6 AMR MAFLE ACER GINNALA CG_C ADOSPRUCE PICEA PJNGENS B'-10' 20 5 BLUE SPRUCE 11 BUFFALO JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SABIN4 5 GAL 5'SPREAD 40 QUAKING ASPEN POPULUS TREMULOIDES !-12"C. 35'_4V "BUFFALO" 16"HIGH lS a>'3S 14 I-I CURRANT RIBES ALPINUM 12"-IS" 5' O II BROOKS POPLAR PORILU9'BROOKS" /1"C. AS' �r 15 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA SPIREA JAPONICA 9"TO 12" 1' '. 517E LOCATION `LITTLE PRINCESS" 20 FROEBEL SPIREA SPIRAFR BUIALDA 11"TO 15" 3' CO "FRI o I OEBELII" _ J /LryH11 15 GOLDFLAME SPIREA SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 12"TO 15" j' F1 rn "GOLDFLAM-' V � o SEEDING NOTES: Q °Z IMWATED LAWN SEED MIX NON-IRRIGATED GRA55 5EED MIX LANDSCAPE NOTES: 2T% RK B PALUEGRASS 10%5_ENDER WHEATGRA55 26%COMM CN KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 40?.WESIERN WNEdTGRA55 08%CREEPING RED FESCUE 10%THICK SPIKE WHEATGRA55 I. PROVIDE SEED FOR 517E EXCLUDING PARKING,SIDEWALKS AND PLANTERS. PROVIDE 21%NEWPORT BLUEGRA55 ID%SLEEP FESCUE I6-20-0 FERTILIZER AT 10 LEE.PER 1000 50UAFc-FEET. FI.PERENNIAL RYEGRA55 10%SHER-1AN SIG BLUESTEM 2, ALL PLANTS TO BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR(1 WINTER). 10%MOUNTAIN BROME BAXTER LANE NORTH 3. PROVIDE ALL FINISH GRADING WITH 6"MIN.TOPSOIL THROUGHOUT, 4. PLATS WILL BE MULCHED WITH*'SHREDDED CEDAR WEST EAST WEIL4ND5 � A EXISTINGLETLANW, SOFT W NE LETLgN95:I1-160.5 fi I` �I LLETLAND5 LgNDxAPNG Atp GRA558EEDNG TO COHPLY WI'N U5 AR•IY CL�OF ENGINEERS W SOUTH GO1•IP HATE IYE LL ATM LII WII IA B RBORI�I•IEMS. - L�J LA GOORDNATE DELNEAtION LINES WI1H BARBARA VgWNJ _ � � zkwN Nj H O o A D4 T N Oa V m LA 22'-0• 22'-0;; 22'-0;; I , s ,I. --II r-' I , -��-- OL �o __ I --- ,7� 10 ""^ e. ---- G k� fi I o f ( o�a K t Y Ai � Z ; 4W 90.FT.LIVABLE —— -- -——- Ipb2 60.FT,LIVABLE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 22' UNIT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR FLAN 26' UNIT "A" SGALE.--.-- 1/9".I'-0" 9CALEe-----'-- -- I/8"•I'-ra" ---....._.__..... __ BB-0 ..__ 27.0" 27'-0' 22'-0• 22 0 26'.0 2V.0 W-0" \� _ she r.. - ` ✓ n_Inle� �I�d lkJ I dW/ o j ] x r ; D—i o PIP � o IJ i 45 5 'FT.LIVABLE 2 .-.1 o Q 4l bQ.FT.GARAGE '- r - 622 SQ.FT.LIVABLE - - 562 SO.FT.LIVABLE W W 463 50.FT.GARAGE 420$0,FT.GARAGE N $a 1"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 22' UNIT M,41N LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 26' UNIT "A" O so Q PA 3 b Y� le'-0' Z Co G` W M N 76-0" pb-0. 00 4 ZZ : 1 o du t G' I �� t_to - - ® • e � a v o l .I W W enar.sulr� *.rar-enru a t�G15 Ip62 SQ.FT.LIVABLE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 26' UNIT "B" 104'-0" : I ✓ z - _ J 0 IL r 'I c � I o — LA I I 11 � II I J N 627$0.FT.LIVABLE 453 SQ.FT.GARAGE MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 26' UNIT "B" m N ,8 RSCALE: A A nunul ��„ n■� .■, IIII ■ml' A LA r� • � � '�nnnul " r�rE ..',�'. ' • ' ■ , ; xio ■dam �'r''L r �a� Iiil■jl �j ■'tll� 'm Ir■rll�H■.. �7,� 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m 11$anlg 1 I 1 n1 In 1 la. '•' L' LI I I LI L' IN r.n I■ I.nli �irnTiu�lri'� 11, �• ;rl��ll..�..�•.�..,..,..�.. a/IHII 11111 I NIHII II®Ir. ... rl ■ ul 11 I l l n I mar .. ::. .y .JL'L�LI � �i631Vti7iIIm4S�C�APLIN 1A67Y34; �-,nAll�` jin.:�r■IIII ... �.�.{ I. r , 1 � ��I�•��nn`. �,—,—�—,—,-1—,—,—,� ■1�1lliiiiiiiiiilil�l■ e•e� r1i, � @SEE 0. �R� Ii, 5:: ,I ila11111 IIIII I I IIIIf , , .. �■ ; _ ■ E �� �n _ ■a■ I■ ■■ !®� _ ■W. ■ ■1■1� ili■ xxxn� _ ® , _ - 1 _ I� = -_==3- — �, 1 — = 1111111 1.... D�IIIIIIIIIlk ICI .■' ., � i.� ICI � � j,+ T:,� = 7 iYi 4ST;ST �TriIi.TL. ■S .�Iflllll►. W� . . 4:e•ir:r. ..fs.. r r : fir N `,��g 1 y, it .. ti LS.r S =.�....� � ■y.■� �} Y� IIII■1 b .. , " . . . �•■1'fiil■fwiir'r"if ui'i i .&i". •:=•r`'=•i• r '�' • � .ice� ■;.; . .. a r ... ai, - . ' . ::a• •', . . , fy; ■ •S � �'� 1 41 . :Z... 5 1 ��.ZriZ�.9Nx1V}i'! :'�:a...:6� .r .�.■__:: �� � r fr nr a f f f ' iS• - '�'�i ■ a. , .■ f . .■ �a a ■i . ■no ■ . h®p .fd�f�lw. .� �I.� ��► j t ..:■7 v��fiS ■ .: ai � T 4 . '�' L7i{� .'i'..�'i'YL.�'.1i}�'� 4'�}!L{�4�=rr'° � � ■ a�Y� ra � '�I� n . u a.rrfar•!rr n br . ,� ■ ,�i�i:a•s . tiu�. . � alri'1-'-_ ___�.!SMR4lldtt�t'i �r, �.:fiT'_ ■_ f .iL jy. �•■•. p . .. °IN.����■■��r�r�� ��3 .r '. ,�°' s �I� f� ar��ilaall�l �'IIa • • ■ ■ a•�� f of f . u a . r ■I�1.. '�' ' ■ ' a�1_LT.l1_IR�V).S!!Ildl9lRr LI 3 ' • _�Zd�E4L_� ■!'� . . ' ■ r — ice■ :�. � r�� . s� l,:�+ ' `- ...�q°1�1�� . �1111 n.._ �..�+f' _ �r:r.� .�1�, �•. vr: T .. .. -- -- I - — — -- ' __ ■_�_�_. .� '::ti .Ta'isizTwO's:i' °`,s:i::r''Inar•�..gdr�s? � sc' ri������� ._ ■■I ■ ■■ III ■Irl■■ ■�■� R■■>w I ■;■� � 'f®■■- ■I■1■� ��I'I� ■11�I■ � ����� I ��'�I', ■ 161�� • �, ICI N■ � I■ ■ ® 3 ■N� ■ � I ■ � I _� ��:-__----- � � — 94@I��E�191l9vs1 �_ l� �em as � ■ 1 - - - _ ..._,� NNNN �IIII�I■I����..�������II�Il16 I�iaf i-i�i'raZ:�ii�i�i��}i�i�liiir�irii��®���II��I�I���������.������i�.�����Z ����...��Z��7���1�����������������i: ''�1:::�r.:�.'..�:i::.�' ..4r::'�'r�i:�L51NS4K T . �'I� '�. .j�j�..�,.�.���'r mom ILf.SV:!�SSSy�Jt:.��5'�'.5ST.16"AAt71M.71.'iL'l�rz.� — —L'.�.�1�:'�2.'{�::2��1�T."�i�i�R■r'�■L�lrr?i1 � iiilY�ii3�i'�i"y�i��xl�.n ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 n �■■� ■■■� ■ III 1�1 � ��® . ■ :■ „ ! - ■ Ifl Ifllfll�Ifll 181fl � : . � ■ O-N! LA ■ I I■ 1111111111111111111111LA - �, i� u ----�� _ �- — i■�■■"lipIN Hui un�uiiu�nnunxn�runn■■m�u ���`� ■ pq 0 • Li 0 i7�Riiil7�n�'i�u�17�i•- L�i 17i17r■ 17�Y7�17i,7�■Yrur,Si•-'.u�■7i,7�n�■7�■u■S�■7�u�i i■ ,7�, ■7i17�.i�F" ■ --�,imilmi7�,7i■m logo IIi i:i�:-:�u:::r:i:.■�ilr� ' �'1 i:r:::��i�::::::u:iu�.:ni:'�� , `!'r:r::.�:■�.:L:u::::i:::::':iu:�un'::�■:::..::��.:�i::Z�' I vLi::sr::'i�rri... i�iN • ., • 11,.:1.11.11_O■11_11/ I \1■■ �r1rw1,.11r1,r11.■1■1.' I -�rOw11_11r■1_11r off .11 „_11w,1.„--■Lr......al.� n.:uu.lunw.r I' n_ururu_u.u.• (' r n_u_n_n_■uu_n.u.n_uru_no•- I mvu-,.■■.Y• `,■u■■uurruu.u.. .■...uu.■.o-.1r_nrruuolyuo• wu■n■Y�uno c• ���:�I:�ilil'I'I'I I (I I ��■:'�u��i�,:�,r' /'I'I' I I ���i,:iY� ■�i,� :�u�,in► I ■i:rilii■�■:i ' �, nun.nr ' `:un.�1'rrr� ' �`r■■.n.■..■u.'_.1_ju.■1■n■n.- 'I'lll' .1■L�u.u. ' . • .. io—■ur- / •.�j,u■v _ �nn.. ■■,uu .rr■■--.r• .■uu■i wu_r' v■�- un.• ���.• �ur1.n.■un.n_u■no• rn.m IIIIIII ���illl Ills���♦ ; IIIIII ; 4��illl II II II 1 .,•� ����� 1 � 1 (I�I ' � 1 III ' � 1 I_ ,1 , '-'—r 1111111111111_ 1111111111111 +,_;;,_;;;;;,_;;;;; ICI■I■I■I■I■I ������- , �1 1_,1.11_11.11.1, �11�1��11�11_r1�1 I 101, II,1/III'11111����i ri iu�i ii �iiLr•II1� i��i��i���ii ii��. i1i'i �iumol"Mi.����r���i i����i■�i■i�11111 i I Ad u-I 1 -Ia 1 1 i - i 1 t e.®i dr ■.■ it l-I I-ICI l a ■-■ l a A l a ■.■ a 1� �. � o a I. .. _ I I _. ICI l a �I a a l a i a1� � •• • • � � ®0 ♦ . ; ♦� ♦� III ♦ 9r 57 p I ®�a Ca®ice - - w®iC ■ I,mo:.....1®�ir - "_.'........._".■..1'_O_.,_.'..■.■'_1, O_■,_p '........Ow.'..'_'■.11r■,_1._■,_■1_'...............__.'1 O ■"■..■......_....■..._■r_■,_O_.■_.._Rrr'_".u_„_■r_.,_O_....'_.'_p■p__.■..■'_,,.".■,_,rrp.r_....r_....'_._._O_".■'■ • • i■■uu■■1■■un.noun■uouu■nr■urZnnr..r■T..'■.'.■'..■..1.■'..'.....'■.'..'..'..'.L'..,.■1■L'..,..1■r':■'fi■1�i-■un■u■r1■u.■uurruu■.u111111 ■u.n■Y'■n■■ulIu..un.n■u■r,..'■n ur■u�uu_■,■nru n■ur■1■ru.'.1■■r ..,■■■■...r..■..■■ .■.■■.■1■ .. ■,.�� ..■_._■■.■,.■_■■.■■.■1r■■-...■_■■.■_■_■--■--.1.■■..■ ■n■..■1.■O.,■■■..■■■urn■■-■■-■■.■■■■1-.■.......r.-....■-.....-■■-■...■-■■. ■.■■.■uW-■■.:■../. •■u■■v�uu:n■nrr..n■■un o..�-o■.n.■ 111_11rO.I1w11_I'.:1_I'.■_,:., 1.. . `,r1■_1■.11.s■_I■_,1r11w11.,1_O_O_:1_1'.1,.■1.Or11_1,of Ira urnwururn.0_11_Or1,r,1_11■ 1.1,_,1.11_:1_11r11_■1r11■11_11.11_Or,:r 1,_11■p_11r11 r ■ '�11_■'■11_11_11.„r1tr,1_ur11.11_11r11. i:,�i,�.'L'i A ��r�rr,ri,�/MalI ��i'�:1�1:1�i,:■:,,:i :u��i1i1��,:1�i,�i■:L�u��:■.�ommimm ��:■:u s A�.�::�:�'�Y:�ui,���i■�:.i.L�.i'�:, r:n=1iiliri,�L��:'�■- i'� `,�M� "�11��:1�ir�i1:u p:.m�,m�l: �.� . ����-- I ,I •�-�:1:::.1,.,:�:.1:.1:.�r�:.� :�-- , ` .1: ■I�I��I:�r�l■r/,i.YYii1:�.�.,��,:�,:���r►. , ..71���� .�.��r�:SI:■::��..�1�:�� ' .: �1:�.:�:�.:.� is:�.:':.ni:::i■::.�:::i:�i I 'II ':.n��i+i:�.:uv::::n�n::1�r I `r�i�::1:i.::�■"::'■loo r:riiu�■:n::.NI:: I v....:�-:u:n�.:::�::ui�.:i-i�r• II I i:rEn::::i-:�uL::�t■:f�� 1■,_1,■,1.1,.1,w,,.r_11.u. I�I, I \,1r,■r.r,1.,,_■'_u.�1.pr� I�I 'rrw7r:■rn__ru�„rn.ur■uu_n.u�.r� -a_■.rn....n�ur�._u_u_- I -■uu_mimimm u��i,w■uw _-u-u.lrur.■.nr■1■nr vruu.r,rnr.u.'■■unn �rn■u■■1ou■ _rur■■ ■.,..Ir V' -„■.,..,■.1■■■.u.uuv ',1■■,.■1■■1_■1■ 1■■1■■1■■� ■�1��1��.i:.■:.':.uii�• ��:�n.1:.1:.n.■uj�• �:ii�lun.il:::.i'iiwiu�.,:i� —+ ���,:.uii,::::ii■D:�r �—■ un.il+::.n�i1■r ��:�i::uu..r■,.. III11 Ill'lll `..iu..ou.-ur IIIIIMal IIIII I'I'I'I 'III 1�i'rn..'rn c. - i; I'I�II■III■_ I �_—�I �■III■IIIII i= u..,.u.u.■.ru�i IIIII■■— i=n■.'�� S II■■IIIII �=.u-un■ Wi MINIM .:.-::.-�::: IIIIIII �::::::::.:::::.::.�: ::::i. ':r:::': I'I .,:. .::.-.� i,...1 ,'.�.. ......■, 1111111�I�1�I 1......... .,...,_1 I�1111111�I�I IIIIIIIIIIIII 1.11 .1. a..1..1. I�I�I�11 I-�III L■,.11. .1.......,, • _■uu■�1. ,... .um��.. a::�:i:.'YSii:. ••u.L.� .... nrr.a .mn■.u.■.n..,.u.-u u1r ■� .�r. .u-uu....■■.■■..um nu.u� .,.. .u...n.■ uum■ +.■■■ - - - - _ -ri.■..■.- .■.■■ _- _ _ - .�a-::::un ,r.n■n■um■n■u. _ - ..■Iu:L .■n■u■u■u■u■1 .u_ . - _._r■uv �.■■.■-r� w .�I■III��- nru_n�u�171iuiuin�uinrururn.:1_1,�,��. _.�■IIIII. .�rj:i■1ii, ■1iw�u�r�'■�i■r11.11r.r'jrur■uuw�lr■Iwll w�■I�w�i7�ll�u••- r• .AI■I■11.. ww �I�::S........• .•�nm� -.....0 .1 rr1./\ w L r rt1�11r11'rl/\illwllw■1'wO �11w11�11�1i�1i�■IL�1 r..r..I N op.\�..ua ....rc_...uo■u._ ..nouor■u■uu.■—uu..-u■u.u_..u.c_.u--..T�r._.u.v...ur...uo'r.uu ■,rn.u.r, ..r.un...ouuou u■v.uuo.o.....ruL..._.o.iuiu►_..u....�.r■u. _rr.rrr ANo ■.*'�,r 1i i � i - - a o•�y� �� - -.. i � -- - -- - � �� - . yid i i� - a � i i1 1! � iii ■� (IIIIIII■IIIIIII.111--11111■— ■ , .Q��I, .of � � C ■� ��—�—�� � �����_�� �'6 ■.■ ri' , �i � �___��_� � i ■■■_ � � �� � I I_I,I �I� _ ��I,��,`. .■� 4 C I -- ■1■I .,,I�I�I I I❑I I I sin �f�1 1 e,7 i I I ■ I—I—I �ro� ® CI ®'Oi I I -I�I—I �I I I 6♦�.e ® o� I—I— ■ �ii, �v► �I,II � •111111111■ ■ M � � � ,a , '■+� . '.'I �f 1' � � ■ ■11y1�IIIIIII W I—I—I- moo id�Iu F!it �i I—I �I I ° _ - s .a9....:p�m► �I—I—I� ■ - �iliiil p�®� ��� (�:a®ce.:nn � r �f® to-®ee ael® I I®•� � 1 c iii1i..17i1ii1i..,iilii■i.' i ' i�n'i17�■i�17�,�L■i�,7i17�■7i.i�■7�1III1 is as of IN slooiMOON�■+r',7m,im■imllml i i,4�■7�1i�1Y■4i1i�■7�1i'ii�.7�17�,7�1Trr.%' ' ■iiiumumlfmlmml iii�■i�liiin�:ia. 'ii�lii.Vii�■i�■i' Ill:ili 7�u�17ii7�u�1i�17�1Tr'r � n ':�.��n�iuiu�r• � 'am■'war:,� i■mi'm:'m:uim lmi■mim:1si1�i'i lmmosommenmar �L1��wi�i■:i�i'i':ui���i':�i�:'�:'iiu il�iil�:u:'� I�L��i1 ■ _ �i:1�i1�a1� ��� ��- �■i■i i�ii■�:'�u�iui■L:'1�11 N �1:::■::i:.■:i�� ' °ti�Nf.'ri:.': m�i■���m�meu�:�.'i�iui.i�• I�� 1i.n.■ iu��u.■:.■i.ilii��� ( ���i1:u mmo-..::N����1-u Iw1:L:i�,:■:i.iuil.il.n r�� u`umno -.■■..■.■■..■.■■.■■■■■..un..■■..■.v I) • mo.■■r.murn..u--■um■ o► I I r .—uon I IN' 'r- 1 vmu u—omn■■—um.0 u u_nrr— �uruLluluu_u.u_u_1—u_u■• I I �1uu_lauuru_nrlunwurn.' I , 'nrlulum„er I •rnLuru_,un_u_n_u.nr„� ,I ■n..ur �i1i111 `n■�'ouuo'u1.u■w■n■ur , 't� `�■■.■.✓f,u■u■u■u■-un..un�r• / I .u-uu._.— .I'Itl' -vuu.nuuur.uur-u u u1u1v -pu.■o■■.■■■■—n.n.no� �■uuo-.u.■u--■.r■■ur� -■u■nr ■..n■n.n.u■n.u■n■w ,ru.r.uw..u_u_u■r• vu.n.uw1—u.uwn_s" vu� -.'.n.n.uwn.uouu_r ru= •�.uurrur'Y'u■nrn IIIII�I (III I'I �♦•■,ou.uuru■■—.'" I'�I I III I'I'I v voun.u.-uuour-t u IIIII��IIIII .n.r �� ■n■n 'I i / ' i IIIII■C IIIII n■u■u.■r■u■n■w �nruwn.nwuw 1 ,. v._u.u_1un.' . 1 _uru_n_uru_uru rl- I1�11 �I01� I01 I1 ■ 'I �®I' I1®11 II o�I 1-� 0� � !I=, �I�'ll I� I►�I II I ■I■I■I■I■I■I o :i■::i.1':.i.::i::.a IIIIIII :::.:.::.:::.•:.:v / 1 ..—:r.:.::::::�::.—:� 1.'1.1,.• I�I�I�I�I�I�I 1.11.11.. .,..,.1,. I�III�I�I�I�I �:w:�.. ,,.1...1.1■.II �umu :i'm�i�:ii:i--■m���i �ONO i:ni oii o' ::�.•�I,•-��i�i�i�i :iiii:iiTii7iiiiiiiiriiiiiTiirii:::-.• •_ iTiiiiiiiiiiiiii7iii:i7ii` 1i_urn_urururu.luurnrnrururlund v- .•�I,•_ wnwm - ■--.u■u■:i-rl.rl.rl.rl.�u■,■■-- u■1■■I-.■��.■,■■1.L.r1■.\ .'■rur,..,...........u.u.u..■.p.u..r..rL.r.'..ur\�.u....u.......--.1..... II�1/III'11111\ `1■-■.-Ii...r...-..-.r.W-.■-L-■r...■'..IL_. r.\:....rl �101=1�1-1�1- �o iii I ♦I�I1��� � ������� = ' ■■� ��I,I:�/ ���I �������I - - I�I I _ 6 - - r 9r 6 � —I— /�_ ��a _ _ alil� —I � ■ ! All ato �t Lr.r■1'>1a fa.ILh':I a®.r eo IMW_��I--�I--�I . I •gg dIy.19s l �I°/lm'i1``I�I—IIME _ _ OEM �'o1�:�� _I I ���i.v10!�,.ea�a I I�_I�! ■_■ _ _S r■■l'Iilli.lni1 ililuililliili Q • �a� �:o a � ■ ■ o • '- I�I�I an �,�� E � z.,� vt�s1 - -- �'s$,� ■.� _� �!a�..>...,.�.��.oa� --- - ,.. ear _o�, Am o� = N Lj U IJ 6 zapd� w �1�om o a� E -- - —- - - — � � f�17 d 0 f Il1 0 U DINING Z U E<t LIVING ROOM 9'x III KITCHEN O O t dl m 12'X 14' DINING LIVING ROOM DINING DM 1 10'X11' O 0 ry 9'X 916" 12'x 14' s'X 9'e, f0 E Q 0 0 u LIVING ROOM Q c 16'X 14' o I�Y�3 ULJ 3 MUD ROOM o 8'X 5' 0 O ® KITCHEN Q O O ® KITCHEN E 12'8"X 916' 0 p O ; 3 3 12 0 15 I I k� IO 9 a _ 6h 15 8.. O 4 - 1 ENTRY +3 gp$ $ GARAGE 1 GARAGE 6'X 16' 5 - 6 III12'X 1 s's^ 1 12'X 19W a� GARAGE - -i x a E b - - 23'X 226^ - 7 -- 3 4 4 t 6' 3 lu ENTRY U ENTRY - - Val X 4' 8'6"X IV w 0 y3 wE 9h 6 m = v N u ©2004 IMPACT Drafting and Design,Inc. O L 74 CL � m 0 N N I In N BEDROOM D MASTER BEDROOM Ou MASTER BEDROOM O O 13'x 12'6" 14'x 12 14'x 12' BEDROOM Bids' �l 14'x 196" MASTER S H MASTER ATH ® UI 7'x 18' 8'8"x L W I 00 I OD LAUNDRY a N MASTER CLOSET I I I 1a'x 10'6" 10'x 6'6" ,MASTER CLOSET O 12 13i 14i IS LAUNDRY LAUNDRY ER CLOSE IS CLOSEx L 7'x 8' 6'6"x 6' to O ----- a 56"x0' 1 5'8"x8' O �} I I � 4s .0 X B WWWLJ4 0 = 4 MASTER BATH �U 15'x 14' 9 MASTERLROOM Drawn Date: 1 15'x 12' - 9 2 GHAS 12 MoW 03 BEDROOM - -- Revlsaa - Date: a BEDROOM a 12'x We" . GHA5 10 Ma 04 GHAS OB Jul 04 _ .2 - I— R.Ltlrr 14 Oe 04 _I_ --- - Q 2005 IMPAGT - DraRmg t Design,Inc, ©2004 IMPACT Drafting and Design,Inc. .cr Lj a ° ° LJ 6 z E: � oma o �l o in N W " dam o Q p 0 c fV E I V1 0.OFU L 1 C O� IJLJ W I�LJ z '2 V£O •_ DINING O DINING DINING DINING cry B'z 11' DM KITCHEN 8'x 11' D M KITCHEN KITCHEN I MG 8'z 11' KITCHEN MQ B'x 11' '.'E 8'x11' 0 O 9'x11' 00 8'x11' Q N p LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM 121x 14' 12'x14' 1 T x 14' 12'x 14' D Le 5 a ® MU6'X5OM � MUD ROOM MU6 ROOM G MU6'X6'OM ® £ o QO o QO OQ o O co) N N U1 i lP / 9 9 e ENTRY a ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY 5'8"x 16 V x 16 6'x 15' 5'8"x 15, GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE L"p x 5 191 x 22'6" 5 19 x 22'8" 18'x 2T6" 19'x 22'6" -+' L o r 4 4 _ I W U E z p = fy t1 m ©2005 IMPACT Drafting and Drsign.Inc. ((a 0 I 6 O BEDROOM �O BEDROOM BEDROOM O BEDROOM OII 0 11'x 12'G 1 T z 12.6" 11'x 12'8" 7T x 12'6" (J j BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM 11'6"x 10'6" ® 12'x 10'6" ® ® 1Y x 10'6" ® 11'6"x 10'6' n�W, V n1 LAUNDRY O LAUNDRY D OI 78NX& T6"X6' (� N, T6"X6' --- TB X6' ''nVn O VI L AST x CLOSET TER CLOSET MASTER V6" MASTER CLOSE W 7'x B'8" 7'x 6'6" 7'x fi'6" O 7'x 8'8" 4 10 I O to I O O 0 I I X � i 5-- -- ® 5_ _ ® ® - > MASTER BATH MASTER BATH MASTER BATH MASTER BATH Drar+n bu: Dake: 7'6"x16' T6"z16' T6"x16' TV'xi6' lEDROOM 2 O& MASTER BIJDROOM MASTER IIEDROOM MASTER RCVI56G7 Dote: 3 MASTER BEDROOM 3 u 11'x 18'6" 11'x 16'6" 1 P z T 6'6^ I 11'x 16'6" GHAS 10 tM4 04, ' © © GHAS I2 k'r JV 04 R.Gt 14 BG 04 ©2005 IMPACT ED - DraFLing Q D0s1gn,Inc. G 2005 IMPACT Drafting and Design,inc. I i u 0 L 6 6 0� � a01r• o a mNry i Q m�uj 6 N � �} a oltN I�JLJ L� o, £o O Q DINING 00 DINING O DINING Z N N KITCHEN /'1Q 9'x IT KITCHEN I MQ � 71XIV O 10 x 11' O O 9'x 11' 8'x 11' KITCHEN MQ luu DINING LIVING ROOM O O 10'x11' 9'x 9'6" 12'x 14' LL O N E Q N 0 LIVING ROOM LINING ROOM _ T LIVING ROOM 12'x 14' 12'x 14' Q 16'x 14' a MUD ROOM (3 MUD ROOM MUD ROOM ° /// a 6'x 5' 6'x 5' Cc)`l O O KITCHEN U Oa O OO 00 126"x96^ O p s a FAI) I I VII II I II '1 4 GARAGE "_1+ 19'x 22'8" ENTRY x w ENTRY 5 ENTRY '� 6 T 5'6"x 14'6' 6 B'x1S - 6'x15' J - 6 GARAGE 5 GARAGE - 5 GARAGE --1=�= 5 i. 6 23'x 22'6" a 19'X 22'8" __ � ��Yf -�-' L 9� _a 86 xA _ Ic e t O V Lu # r"`a 3K 117 ,94- 4 3 m dg 1f1 y -- __ — ENTRY 0 — 88 x4 1 o m E z p = N N II 6 V 9 N ®2005IMPACT Orafling and Design,ina R O m m Iy I � m — — — — — — c BEDROOM O BEDROOM O �O 3 13'x 12'8" 11'x 12'6" BEDROOM O n BEDROOM BEDROOM MASTER BEDROOM ® 14'x 10'6" ® 12'x We" 14'x 14'8" BEDROOM M TER BATH '8"x 18' u' LAUNDRY �I LAUNDRY O 916"z6' .IILJI T6"x6' 1 LAUNDRY MASTER CLOSET 10'x 6'6" T6"x e' � 6 O _ . -- mal, _ m� _ _ -- -1- - - -I- —I - ® [] 1 0 — I II — I II —._-- -- — II —4-1 L HI8 CLOS H R CLOSET MASTER CLOG LAUNDRY MASTER CO' Il\ O 5'8"x8' 5'6"z6' _ TxB'S. x W O O 0 tB'x to O O rx6'B _ I Ic 15 f1 _ ® — 14 ® 6 �V ^` 5 _5 W 5 5 12 MASTER BATH I a a -- a w 8'x 14' MASTER BEDROOM � q ® 15'x 14'S" 1 - e MASTER BATH 1 Drown Dole: _1 MASTER BATH MASTER B DROOM 1 7 8'x 16' - GHAS I2 Ma 03 11'x i6'6" MASTER BEDROOM ry_ n BEDROOM 5 � 11 x 18'8" n' Re"56d , Date, 12'x 12.6" 4 GHAS 10 May 04 3 GHAS 01 JWY 04 © 2 © R1,121,04 ©2005 �Mf Ar T I Drafting n P-19n,Inc. — ierc9^r��iK W�"aala o, eueuprca n.woe tIT d"n a aairy,arc. 0 2005 IMPACT Drafting and Design,Inc. ���111111 Jill 2182555 III����� 0312012WS 10:24A Sheller Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 24.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FORA CONDMONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BAXTER SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAXTER LANE WEST OF THE THOMAS DRIVE AND BAXTER LANE INTERSECTION, BOZEMAN,MONTANA WHEREAS,the undersigned properly owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified architectural and landscape plan for 101 townhouse units and 2 multi-household buildings with the relaxation of Section 18.20.020"Permitted Uses"to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the"R 3"zoning district,Section 18.20.030"Lot Area and Width"to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet, Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback and Section 18.50.110.K"No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards"to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback WHEREAS,the subject property is legally described as Elk WA SE1/SWl/+,Section 35, T1S,R5E,Gallatin County,Montana;and WHEREAS,the Conditional Use Pennit is subject to the following tweet)-one(21) conditions and code provisions: Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under anyconditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to bythe owner of the land,successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions,corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. Baxter Square Zoning PUD NZ-03132 PAGE I 2182555 ' II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 10/2812US 1 08 0:24A Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc HT MtSC 24.00 CONDMONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDPPIONAL USE PERMIT 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,including excavation and footing preparation,but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required,on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of securityequal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of securityshall be valid for a period of not less than twelve(12)months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan,building pertnits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C3"Preparation of a Landscape Plan",landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience,or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0"Parking Lot Landscaping,"which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet,with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A 13. Awatercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared bya qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g"Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops,an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15.Per Section 18.50.1101.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces",parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required$100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed"Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing,as defined in Chapter 18.04,if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided,and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 2 I I{I I{I 182555 I�IIII`till IIN�II�II1�IIII IIIII�III�I III�IIII III 08120/200of 4 8 10:24A Shallay Vanoe-Gallatin Co MT MISC 24.00 CONDMONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDPIMONAL USE PERMrr 17.Section 18.54.060.C4.d"Open Space Maintenance Plan,"requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces,recreational areas,communally owned facilities,and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city,the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines,including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers,with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2 "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements". The City of Bozeman shall be third partyto anychanges or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved bythe Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of anysignage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 20.Adequate snow storage area must be designated on the final site plan identifying areas to store snow off of the streets and sidewalks and outside the street vision triangles. 21. The property owner shall provide screening along the east propertyline adjacent to the 8-plexes that complies with the zoning ordinance and is acceptable to the property owner,adjacent property owners and the City of Bozeman. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted twenty-one (21)conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property,my successors or assigns,as long as the subject property is being used as a residential Planned Unit Development. DATED THIS DAY OF �Q/�G�, ,20f Baxter S uarc Zoning PUD#Z-03132 PAGE 3 2182555 IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIIIII IIIII IIIIII IIIIII I III IIII 0Page: 4 of 4 3/20/2005 10:24A Shelley Vanes-Gallatin Co MT MISC 24.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDMONAL USE PERMU LANDOWNER A4 Ar!Grant Baxter Square,L.L.C. STATE OF MONTANA ) :SS County of Gallatin ) On this!,, day of /40.mz — ,2005,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared ' Grant known to me to be the Mem be r of Baxter Square,L.L.G,the companythat executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for and on behalf of said company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed myNomrial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Tinted Name NotaryPublic f e State of Montana Residing at ,Mo a 7Oob r' My Commission Expires LANDOWNER Evert Wlerda CAW,LL.0 STATE OF MONTANA ) :SS County of Gallatin ) On this 10t dayof 12005,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Pupblic for the State of Montana, personally appeared Evert Wierda, known to me to be the ;71'7!,ViW (print title here) of CAW, L.L.C., the company that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) PPoJns�N"" 141, qT.�0SARIqj .f' ' (Printed Narrid Here) • �r.A�� _ Notary Public for the State of Montana *•• Sr+�`, Q� Residing at�,Montana LIN,4 My Commission Expires J.,3,to2oD7 Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 4 so CITY CW OZEMAN 'y DEPAR NT OF PLANNING AND, COMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Vti 9x Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 co �o�'� Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net June 4, 2003 Baxter Square Partners, LLC ATTN: Voss Bowman 20 1 S- C�f�o ✓ � .� y �� 8289-IJtiif �Lane 5 q 7(Y o�n, MT ovek ATTN: Evert Wierda - '3.17-Sanders-Avenue _Bozem n MT,5971 8 Re: 'Baxter Square Zoning PUD Preliminary Plan Application #Z-03132 and MaSub Preliminary Plat Application #P-03020 Dear Sirs: The applications for the above referenced Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat and PUD Preliminary Plan have been received and assigned to Assistant Planner Jami Morris. The applications were reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklists and appear to meet the submittal requirements. However, please understand that during the course of review there may be items or issues identified which need to be addressed. Should that occur, Planner Morris will contact you. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will discuss the applications on three consecutive Tuesdays, June 24, July 1, and 8, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. The Design Review Board (DRB) will discuss the Zoning PUD Preliminary Plan Application on Tuesday, July 8, 2003 at 3:30 p.m. All DRC and DRB meetings are held in the basement Conference Room, Alfred M. Stiff Professional Office Building, at 20 East Olive Street. The City Planning Board will discuss the MaSub Preliminary Plat Application on Monday, August 4, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. and the City Commission will conduct a public hearing on both proposals at 7:00 p.m. Monday, August 18, 2003, in the Commission Meeting Room at City Hall, 411 East Main Street. You and your representative(s) are encouraged to attend the last two DRC, the DRB, the Planning Board, and City Commission meetings to answer any questions that may arise. You and your representative(s) will be sent information prior to each meeting. planning• zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination Please feel free to contact Planner Morris at 582-2260 if you have any questions regarding the application or the review process in general. Si�cerely, . � 1 Tara Hastie Planning Secretary TH/th cc: C&H Engineering and Surveying, 205 Edelweiss Dr., Bozeman, MT 59718 JKG and Assoc., 285 Frontier Dr., Bozeman, MT 59718 AOL 26807 City of Bozeman Receipt $ Bozeman, Montana , 20 Received of the sum of Dollars for 94, y7lig By 1 CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT J ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING- 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P. 0. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-1230 (406) 582-2260, FAX (406) 582-2263 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN P.U.D. --------=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may, under certain circumstances,be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This review will also include a review for Certificate of Appropriateness, if applicable. Deviations and/or variances will be processed concurrently. Additional submittal materials apply. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: ter S uare Partners L.L.C. 8289 Huffine Lane, Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone:—(406)586-6207 Name and mailing address of property owner: DAK L.L.C. • 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: - 481 2. Name and mailing address of applicant: C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc. 205 Edelweiss, Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406)587-1115 3. Name and mailing address of representative: _C&H Engineering & Surve��, Inc. 205 Edelweiss, Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406)587-1115 4. Name and mailing address of Engineer/Architect/Planner: JKG and Associates 285 Frontier Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone:(406)388-6973 5. Name of project/development:—Baxter Square PUD Subdivision 6. Address of proposed development:�5371 Baxter Lane, Bozeman, MT 59718 7. Legal description:_E %2 OF SW '/4 &W %2 OF SE '/4, Sec 35, T2S, R5E_ 8. Current Zoning R-3 Land Area: 789,341 sq.ft. or 18.1207 acres 9. Describe the proposed development (use additional sheets if necessary): 101 townhouse lots, 2 8- • plex lots and 1 single family lot 10. Review Fee: $660.00 plus $6.00 per residential unit and/or$4.00 per 1,000 sf gross leasable PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 1 non-residential floor area This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and twenty(20) copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8%2"x 11" or larger than 24"x 36 folded in individual sets not smaller than 8%"x I1"or larger than 8%"x 14"in size. Application deadlines vary. This application must be signed and dated by each applicant and property owner(if different) before the submittal will be accepted. I(We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our) knowledge. Date: saw Date: Applicant's Signature Prop5d.y wner's ature fzs1Q3 PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 2 I CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING- 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230,BOZEMAN, MT 59711-1230 (406) 582-2360 FAX (406) 582-2363 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-------------------------- Applicant Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C. &DAK L.L.C. Date: 5/27/03 Residential PUD Project Baxter Square PUD Subdivison Coinmercial PUD The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items listed for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked"NO" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Upon submittal, staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete. If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review • Board (DRB) agendas, followed by a City Planning Board review. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. 1. Document Requirements YES NO N/A The following information shall be presented in an 8Y x 11"vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and will be organized in the following order: A. Application forms; �1 B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the PUD; C. Legal description of the site; D. Adjacent property owners: 1 A copy of the list of the names and addresses of record of real property within 400' of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the PUD is proposed, exclusive of public r/w; / 2 The original list shall be included in the document; i PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 3 3 Names and addresses shall be included on plain(no return_address), / #10 (4-1/8" x 9-1/2"), stamped envelopes; E. A statement of planning objectives, including: (1) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan; (2) Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and applicant's intentions with regard to future / ownership of all or portions of the PUD; (3) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and industrial uses; (4) Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; (5) The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100, documentation pursuant to these regulations • for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; (6) Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated; (7) Statements of design methods to reduce.energy consumption, (e.g. -home/business, utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling); . Z F. A development schedule indicating the approximate.date when construction of the PUD, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public y improvements and recreational and common space areas; G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and / graphic illustrations at 8%x 11" or 11" x 17" size. • PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 4 • • 2. Site Plan Requirements - YES NO N/A dek, The site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale not greater than 14W,. 1" = 40' or less than 1" = 100'; and composed of one (1) or more sheets not larger than 24'x 36", showing the following information: A. Name of project/development; B. Location of project/development by street address; C. Location map; including area within one(1) mile of site; D. Name and mailing address of developer/owner; E. Name and mailing address of engineer/architect; F. Date of plan preparation; G. North point indicator; H. Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; f/ I. Listing of specific land uses being proposed; • J. Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; K. Total number, type, and density per type of dwelling units; L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel; M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot-size (Floor Area Ratio, FAR), with a breakdown by land use; N. Proposed coverage of buildings and structures for parcel(s) and total site, including the following: (1) Percentage and square footage of building coverage; (2) Percentage and square footage of driveway and parking; (3) Percentage and square footage of public street r/w; V • PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 5 • • (4) Percentage and square footage of open space and/or YES° NO N/A landscaped area; (5) Percentage and square footage of Active recreational use area; 0. Number and location of off-street parking, including guest, handicapped, bicycle and motorcycle parking, with typical dimensions of each; P.. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; Q. Watercourses, water bodies and irrigation ditches; R. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; S. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs,having a diameter greater than 2%, by species; T. Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; • U. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active recreational use; V. Location and acreage of common open areas and all public and semi-public land uses, including public parks,recreational areas, school sites, and similar uses; W. Location of existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; X. Maximum building height of all structures; Y. The existing and proposed circulation system of arterial, collector and local streets, including off-street parking areas; service areas; loading zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the development; notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included where appropriate; Z. Existing zoning; AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD, including materials • and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls, and other landscaping; PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 6 BB. g Proposed si a e, with locations and illustrative examples; r/ p � CC. Adjacent site information: Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200' of the proposal, exclusive of public r/w at the same scale as the proposal j and including the following: t/ (1) Land uses and location of principle structures; (2) Densities of residential uses; (3) Existing trees and major features of landscape; (4) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; (5) Traffic Circulation System; DD. Supplemental vicinity map: Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one (1) mile showing: (1) Zoning districts; (2) Location of municipal boundary lines; (3) Traffic circulation system; (4) Major public facilities including schools, parks, trails, etc.; EE. Attorney's or owner's(s') certification of ownership; r/ FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the City Planning Board and Zoning Commission certification of approval of the site plan, including a statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100; GG. Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on the site plan; • 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 7 NM, A. Architectural elevations: Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey / the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements; B. Landscape treatment: A general landscaping plan indicating: (1) Treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces; t/ (2) All existing vegetation with identification of trees by sizes of / species; (3) Specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after construction; (4) The scale shown on plant materials; C. Utility plans: The existing and proposed utility systems'and proposed utility systems, including: (1) Sanitary sewers; (2) Storm sewers; (3) Water; (4) Electric; r� (5) Gas; (6) Telephone lines; (7) Fire hydrants; (8) Trash collection areas; D. Street cross sections if different from City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including the proposed width, treatment of curbs and gutters, sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and'standards • of the City are proposed; PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 8 E. Physiograpluc data, including the following: (1) A description of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and ` proposed landscaping; (2) A map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch showing the 100' year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City; (3) A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table, fluctuations, and a statement of site suitability for Z intended construction and proposed landscaping; F. Drainage plan: Preliminary drainage report and calculations and/or plan, including: (1) All watercourses on the property or which are located within 200' of the property, must be shown; in addition, the floodways and/or / flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated; • (2) All drainage, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc., which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated; (3) All irrigation ditches, laterals, and structures shall be shown; (4) All required on-site detention areas, including notes indicating the approximate area and volume of the facility; (5) All plans shall indicate the proposed outlet for the storm drainage from the property, including the name of the drainage-way (where appropriate), the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage-ways, etc.), and any downstream restrictions; (6) Existing and/or proposed grading plan; G. Temporary facilities plan: A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 9 N91k( H. Preliminary subdivision plat: If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; I. Traffic impact analysis: At the discretion of the Public Service Director a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, and upon surrounding land uses; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: (1) Land use and trip generation- a table of each type of land use, the number of units or square footage, as appropriate, the trip rates used(daily and peak hour) and resulting trip generation; (2) Traffic graphics showing: (a) AM peak hour site traffic; (b) PM peak hour site traffic; (c) AM peak hour total traffic; (d) PM peak hour total traffic (e) Total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately); (3) AM and PM capacity analysis: An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial, collector-collector, and arterial-collector intersections within one (1) mile of the site or as directed by the Director of Public Service; (4) Report format shall be as follows: (a) Trip generation- using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual; (b) Trip distribution; (c) Traffic assignment; • (d) Capacityanalysis; a PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 10 (e) Evaluation; (f) Recommended access plan, including access points, modifications and any mitigation techniques; (5) Additional Analysis Criteria: Appropriate clearance intervals shall be provided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian movements must be provided for each cycle and pedestrian overpasses shall not be at intersections; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be 4'per second with a minimum "WALK"time of seven seconds; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three(3) through lanes in each direction, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount importance; consequently, all potential intersections with signals will be placed on 3 mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. Intersection Level of Service "C"shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service "D"be accepted for site operations; arterial intersections and turning operations shall • operate at Level of Service"C"; if Level of Service "E"is the result. of the study, then alternatives of providing Level of Service "D" shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; generally, the design year will be approximately fifteen(15) years following construction. (6) Summary analysis explaining: (a) The proposed access points for the project, their location and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation; (b) Future off-site road improvements for access, which roads they will be, the projected time frame for their completion and who is responsible for their completion; (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets; (d) How traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the PUD; (e) Describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the development, if used; • J. Additional studies and plans: PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION.AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 l 1 f I The City Planning Board and Zoning Commission or City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as it is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed PUD; particularly if the development's compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; 4. Reproducible Copy Requirements In addition to the above document, Site plan and Supplemental Plan requirements the applicant shall submit the following for review purposes: * Reference to 18.54.060 A Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements@ of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance (7/02/90) Fee: $660.00 plus $6.00 per residential unit and/or$4.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable industrial or commercial (includes professional business offices) floor area. Minimum fee after refund: $500.00 CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I, L �r�� , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, TO THE • BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ATTACHED NAME AND ADDRESS LIST OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT �3` I 6aX4e Z4Ae , IS TRUE AND ACCURATE LIST FROM THE LAST DECLARED GALLATIN COUNTY TAX RECORDS. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT AN INACCURATE LIST MAY DELAY REVIEW OF THE PROJECT. SI NATURE PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ September 2002 12 BAXTER SQUARE SUBDIVISION BOZEMAN, MONTANA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION Prepared By: C&H Engineering and Surveying,Inc. 205 Edelweiss Drive Bozeman,MT 59718 (406) 587-1115 Y Project: 02395 May 2003 Owner&Developer: DAK,L.L.C. BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS,L.L.C. 317 Sanders Avenue 8289 Huffine Lane Bozeman,MT 59718 Bozeman,MT 59718 Building Clusters • Cluster Lot Area(ft2) Cluster Area Excluding Building %Building Driveway % Driveway Lots per Average Liveable Private Street Easement Area(ft2) Coverage Area(ft2) Cluster Lot Size Space(ft2) FAR Cluster 1 13,545 13,545 4,397 32.5% 1,215 9.0% 4 3,386 6,736 0.50 Cluster 11,970 11,970 4,407 36.8% 1,175 9.8% 4 2,993 6,736 0.56 Cluster 3 12,349 12,349 4,401 35.6% 1,197 9.7% 4 3,087 6,736 0.55 Cluster4 19,363 16,921 4,569 27.0% 1,590 9.4% 4 4,230 4,874 0.29 .Cluster 5 8,307 7,029 2,210 31.4% 603 8.6% 2 3,515 3,368 0.48 Cluster 6 13,336 9,502 3,297 34.7% 896 9.4% 3 3,167 5,052 0.53 Cluster 7 6,368 6,368 2,207 34.7% 559 8.8% 2 3,184 3,368 0.53 Cluster 8 10,717 9,025 3,296 36.5% 868 9.6% 3 3,008 5,052 0.56 Cluster 9 12,388 10,026 3,294 32.9% 1,036 10.3% 3 3,342 5,052 6.50 Cluster 10 17,051 14,413 3,300 22.9% 4,396 30.5% 1 14,413 6,872 0.48 Cluster 11 14,384 12,152 4,401 36.2% 1,261 10.4% 4 3,038 6,736 0.55 Cluster 12 13,224 11,172 4,407 39.4% 1,261 11.3% 4 2,793 6,736 0.60 Cluster 13 13,224 11,172 4,407 39.4% 1,261 11.3% 4 2,793 6,736 0.60 Cluster 14 16,798 14,182 3,300 23.3% 4,720 33.3% 1 14,182 6,872 0.48 Cluster 15 17,015 10,544 4,897 46.4% 1,064 10.1% 3 3,515 4,472 0.42 Cluster 16 16,477 10,427 3,800 36.4% 1,197 11.5% 3 3,476 4,472 0.43 Cluster 17 11,131 7,963 3,296 41.4% 937 11.8% 3 2,654 5,052 0.63 Cluster 18 10,779 7,891 3,295 41.8% 900 11.4% 3 2,630 - 5,052 0.64 Cluster 19 11,637 8,325 3,012 36.2% 1,050 12.6% 3 2,775 4,382 0.53 Cluster 20 11,269 8,325 3,012 36.2% 919 11.0% 3 2,775 4,382 0.53 Cluster 21 10,216 7,307 2,194 30.00/. 442 6.0% 2 3,654 3,106 0.43 Cluster 22 9,893 7,307 2,194 30.0% 739 10.1% 2 3,654 3,106 0.43 Cluster23 9,406 9,406 3,285 34.9% 1,204 12.8% 3 3,135 4,659 0.50 Cluster 24 8,316 8,316 3,012 36.2% 1,037 12.5% 3 2,772 4,382 0.53 Cluster 25 10,242 10,242 2,736 26.7% 1,376 13.4% 4 2,561 5,658 0.55 Cluster 26 11,714 11,714 4,284 36.6% 1,496 12.8% 4 2,929 -6,099 0.52 Cluster27 12,656 9,393 2,820 30.0% 1,014 10.8% 3 3,131 4,269 0.45 Cluster28 9,315 9,315 2,820 30.3% 0.0% 3 3,105 4,269 0.46 Cluster 29 12,993 12,993 4,385 33.7% 1,448 11.1% 4 3,248 6,212 0.48 Cluster 30 17,314 13,112 4,384 33.4% 1,775. 13.5% 4 3,278 -6,212 0.47 Cluster 31 21,597 14,589 4,284 29.4% 1,316 9.0% 4 3,647 6,099 0.42 Cluster 32 8,524 7,099 2,192 30.9% 660 9.3% 2 3,550 31106 0.44 Cluster 33 16,707 14,703 4,283 29.1% 1,420 9.7% 4 3,676 6,099 0.41 Averages= 12,734 10,570 3,518 33.7% 1,274 11.5% 3,857 0.50 Baxter Square Subdivision • • Area Tabulations Individual Lots Lot Lot Area(ft2) Lot Area Excluding Building %Building Driveway % Driveway Liveable Private Street Easement Area(ft2) Coverage Area(ft2) Space(ft2) FAR Lot 1 6,667• 3,859 1,092 28.3% 254 6.6% 1,684 0.44 Lot 3,042 2,574 1,100 42.7% 324 12.6% 1,684 0.65 Lot 3 3,627 3,069 1,105 36.0% 318 10.4% 1,684 0.55 Lot 4 3,627 3,069 1,105 36.0% 335 10.9% 1,684 0.55 Lot 5 4,680 3,960 1,105 27.9% 268 6.8% 1,684 0.43 Lot 6 3,454 3,454 1,102 31.9% 314 9.1% 1,684 0.49 Lot 7 2,914 2,914 1,105 37.9% 245 8.4% 1,684 0.58 Lot 8 2,914 2,914 1,102 37.8% 300 10.3% 1,684 0.58 Lot 9 2,444 2,444 1,102 45.1% 318 13.0% 1,684 0.69 Lot 10 5,359 3,667 1,092 29.8% 250 6.8% 1,684 0.46 Lot 11 17,051 14,413 3,300 22.9% 4,396 30.5% 6,872 0.48 Lot 12 3,596 3,038 1,090 35.9% 253 8.3% 1,684 0.55 Lot 13 3,016 2,548 1,102 43.2% 325 12.8% 1,684 0.66 Lot 14 5,776 4,440 1,102 24.8% 488 11.0% 1,684 0.38 Lot 15' 10,093 7,651 1,588 20.8% 374 4.9% 1,104 0.14 Lot 16 2,838 2,838 939 33.1% 470 16.6% 1,043 0.37 Lot 17 2,747 2,747 938 34.1% 420 15.3% 1,043 0.38 Lot 18 3,685 3,685 1,105 30.0% 326 8.8% 1,684 0.46 Lot 19 3,497 3,497 1,105 31.6% 310 8.9% 1,684 0.48 " Lot 20 2.,827 2,827 1,102 39.0% 345 12.2% 1,684 0.60 Lot 21 2,765 2,765 1,102 39.9% 309 11.2% 1,684 0.61 Lot 22 3,260 3,260 1,092 33.5% 233 7.1% 1,684 0.52 Lot 23' 3,255 3,255 1,105 33.9% 250 7.7% 1,684 0.52 Lot 24 2,730 2,730 1,105 40.5% 335 12.3% 1,684 0.62 Lot 25 2,730 2,730 1,105 40.5% 320 11.7% 1,684 0.62 Lot 26 3,255 3,255 1,092 33.5% 270 8.3% 1,684 0.52 Lot 27' 3,255 3,255 1,105 33.9% 254 7.8% 1,684 0.52 Lot 28 2,730 2,730 1,100 40.3% 341 12.5% 1,684 0.62 Lot 29 2,730 2,730 1,100 40.3% 345 12.6% 1,684 0.62 Lot 30 4,830 4,830 1,092 22.6% 275 5.7% 1,684 0.35 Lot 31 57,120 54,057 3,650 6.8% 2,284 4.2% Lot 32 7,888 5,884 1,272 21.6% 355 6.0% 1,684 0.29 Lot 33 3,066 3,066 1,096 35.7% 428 14.0% 1,684 0.55 Lot 34 2,220 2,220 820 36.9% 259 11.7% 1,043 0.47 Lot 35 3,533 3,533 1,095 31.0% 378 10.7% 1,684 0.48 Lot 36 3,539 3,539 1,095 30.9% 362 10.2% 1,684 0.48 Lot 37 3,018 3,018 1,096 36.3% 362 12.0% 1,684 0.56 Lot 38 3,005 3,005 1,096 36.5% 362 12.0% 1,684 0.56 Lot 39 3,431 3,431 1,098 32.0% 362 10.6% 1,684 0.49 Lot40 2,555 2,555 820 32.1% 225 8.8% 1,684 0.66 Lot 41 2,022 2,022 820 40.6% 225 11.1% 1,043 0.52 Lot42 4,738 4,738 1,180 24.9% 324 6.8% 1,684 0.36 Lot 43 6,581 4,819 1,180 24.5% 324 6.7% 1,717 0.36 Lot 44 2,650 2,030 820 40.4% 340 16.7% 1,276 0.63 Lot 45 3,425 2,544 820 32.2% 350 13.8% 1,276 0.50 Lot 46 4,526 3,384 1,096 32.4% 534 15.8% 1,553 0.46 Lot47 3,995 3,019 1,096 36.3% 428 14.2% 1,553 0.51 Lot 48 4,077 3,115 1,096 35.2% 490 15.7% 1,553 0.50 Lot 49 4,716 3,594 1,096 30.5% 323 9.0% 1,553 0.43 Lot 50 4,679 3,557 1,096 30.8% 395 11.1% 1,553 0.44 Lot 51 2,954 2,249 820 36.5% 226 10.0% 1,276 0.57 Lot 52 4,044 3,083 1,096 35.5% 335 10.9% 1,553 0.50 Lot 53 9,920 5,700 1,272 22.3% 360 6.3% 1,717 0.30 Lot 54 4,423 3,695 1,066 28.8% 360 9.7% 1,553, 0.42 Lot 55 4,101 3,404 1,126 33.1% 300 8.8% 1,553 0.46 Lot 56 4,756 4,018 1,092 27.2% 292 7.3% 1,684 0.42 Lot 57 3,016 2,548 1,102 43.2% 342 13.4% 1,684 0.66 Lot 58 3,016 2,548 1,102 43.2% 358 14.1% 1,684 0.66 Lot 59 3,596 3,038 1,105 36.4% 269 8.9% 1,684 0.55 Lot 60 3,596 _3,038 1,092 35.9% 292 9.6% 1,684 0.55 Lot 61 3,016 8 1,105 43.4% 342 13.$ 1,684 0.66 Lot 62 3,016 48 1,105 43.4% 358 14.1 1,684 0.66 !Lot 63 3,596 3,038 1,105 36.4% 269 8.9% . 1,684 0.55 Lot 64 3,596 3,038 1,092 35.9% 292 9.6% 1,684 0.55 Lot 65 3,016 2,548 1,105 43.4% 342 13.4% 1,684 0.66 Lot 66 3,016 2,548 1,105 43.4% 358 14.1% 1,684 0.66 Lot 67 3,596 3,038 1,105 36.4% 269 8.9% 1,684 0.55 Lot 68 16,798 14,182 3,300 23.3% 4,720 33.3% 6,872 0.48 Lot 69 9,495 5,326 1,587 29.8% 423 7.9% 1,104 0.21 Lot 70 3,185 2,327 1,105 47.5% 387 16.6% 1,684 0.72 Lot 71 3,797 2,774 1,108 39.9% 387 14.0% 1,684 0.61 Lot 72 3,797 2,774 1,092 39.4% 260 9.4% 1,684 0.61 Lot 73 3,185 2,327 1,104 47.4% 320 13.8% 1,684 0.72 Lot 74 3,797 2,790 1,099 39.4% 320 11.5% 1,684 0.60 Lot 75 4,287 3,167 1,096 34.6% 325 10.3% 1,553 0.49 Lot 76 2,695 1,991 820 41.2% 200 10.0% 1,276 0.64 Lot 77 4,287 3,167 1,096 . 34.6% 394 12.4% 1,553 0.49 Lot 78 4,288 3,167 1,100 34.7% 381 12.0% 1,553 0.49 Lot 79 5,605 4,140 1,094 26.4% 358 8.6% 1,553 0.38 Lot80 5,788 4,140 1,098 26.5% 442 10.7% 1,553 0.38 Lot 81 4,428 31167 1,096 34.6% 409 12.9% 1,553 0.49 Lot 82 4,427 3,167 1,096 34.6% 422 13.3% 1,553 0.49 Lot 83 2,783 1,991 820 41.2% 268 13.5% 1,276 0.64 Lot 84 4,427 3,167 1,096 34.6% 360 11.4% 1,553 0.49 Lot 85 3,921 2,805 1,102 39.3% 290 10.3% 1,684 0.60 Lot 86 3,289 2,353 1,102 46.8% 392 16.7% 1,684 0.72 Lot 87 3,921 2,805 1,092 38.9% 255 9.1% 1,684 0.60 Lot88 3,921 2,805 1,111 39.6% 255 9.1% 1,684 0.60 Lot 89 3,289 2,353 1,102 46.8% 400 17.0% 1,684 0.72 Lot 90 9,805 5,386 1,587 29.5% 409 7.6% 1,104 0.20 Lot91 3,528 3,528 1,097 31.1% 417 11.8% 1,553 0.44 Lot 92 2,713 2,713 1,095 40.4% 400 14.7% 1,553 0.57 Lot 93 3,165 3,165 1,096 34.6% 387 12.2% 1,553 0.49 Lot 94 3,164 3,164 1,096 34.6% 417 13.2% 1,553 0.49 Lot 95 1,989 1,989 820 41.2% 240 12.1% 1,276 0.64 Lot 96 3,163 3,163 1,096 34.7% 380 12.0% 1,553 0.49 Lot 97 3,162 3,162 1,096 34.7% 436 13.8% 1,553 0.49 Lot 98 1,987 1,987 820 41.3% 270 13.6% 1,276 0.64 Lot 99 1,985 1,985 820 41.3% 300 15.1% 1,276 0.64 Lot 100 3,108 3,108 1,096 35.3% 370 11.9% 1,553 0.50 Lot 101 2,993 2,993 1,096 36.6% 473 15.8% 1,553 0.52 Lot 102 1,820 1,820 820 45.1% 293 16.1% 1,276 0.70 Lot 103 2,420 2,420 1,096 45.3% 358 14.8% 1,553 0.64 Lot 104 4,481 4,481 1,272 28.4% 372 8.3% 1,717 0.38 Averages= 3,685 2,950 1,067 37.4% 351 12.3% 0.55 to BUILT FOR B218IN S 2305 Cetran St 1 Bozeman.Mf 58718� l � 1.408.982.4985 OC W y2 S EI lq s�yq S 3s s M .... .................------------._._...................... ..................� q :.........................:........................................................................._.._.._ _■�fr r1Pop re ry ! --- ' B wz R-3 C BO ICF BOZEMAN D TMENT OF PLANNING AND OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT V � z: Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2260 Cl 20 East Olive Street ct 83 �° Fax: (406) 582-2263 CO. 0 Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public meetings before the CITY OF BOZEMAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE on Tuesday,July 8,2003,at 10:00 a.m. and the CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD on Tuesday, July 8, 2003 at 3:30 p.m., to discuss a Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development. Both meetings are to be held in the Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, 20 East Olive Street, Bozeman, Montana. Further notice is given of a public meeting before the CITY OF BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD on Tuesday, August 5, 2003, to discuss a Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat application. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, August 11, 2003, to consider both the Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development application and the Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat application for Baxter Square Planned Unit Development to be held at 7:00 p.m., in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana The applications would allow the property owners Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, Montana 59741 and Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, Montana 59718 represented by C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59718, to subdivide18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots and one single household residential lot and to establish a unified development plan with requested relaxations from the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The property owners are also requesting concurrent construction of buildings and the subdivision infrastructure as outlined for Planned Unit Developments in Section 16.22.030 "Completion of Improvements" of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and Section 18.50.030.D "Water and Sanitary Sewer System Requirements" in the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The subject property is legally described as the E'h W'h SEA SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana, and generally located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. The property is preliminarily approved for "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) zoning. Approval of the Subdivision Planned Unit Development application would allow a relaxation of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations Section 16.16.080 "Paving Requirements" to allow construction of the private streets to less than the adopted city standards for the driving/parking lane and sidewalk widths and the for a sidewalk system to be constructed without a boulevard. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development application would allow the relaxation of the following sections of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district; b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,006 square feet; c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty foot front yard setback; d)Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback; e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks"to allow the townhouses to eneroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback; f) 18.50.110.13 "Stall,Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet; and g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side B-2 Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to -- -- - seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot --- side yard setback. Sub ect ert — at I t'F Public testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written Pro p Y BP E comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 3 59771-1230. Data pertaining to the application may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, .r R- R-1 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA '"`' Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-03132 Baxter Square Zoning Preliminary Plan PUD R-3 #P-03020 Baxter Square MaSub Preliminary Plat PUD 4°4 BOZO CI�a OF BOZEMAN DVkRTMENT OF PLANNING AND WMUNITY DEVELOPMENT V � ' Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406)582-2260 20 East Olive Street e Fax: (406)582-2263 t�r�H co.� � Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public meetings before the CITY OF BOZEMAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE on Tuesday, July 8,2003,at 10:00 a.m. and the CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD on Tuesday, July 8, 1003 at 3:30 p.m., to discuss a Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development. Both meetings are to be held in the Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, 20 East Olive Street, Bozeman, Montana. Further notice is given of a public meeting before the CITY OF BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD on Tuesday, August 5, 2003, to discuss a Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat application. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, August 11, 2003, to consider both the Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development application and the Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat application for Baxter Square Planned Unit Development to be held at 7:00 p.m., in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana The applications would allow the property owners Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, Montana 59741 and Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, Montana 59718 represented by C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59718, to subdivide18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots and one single household residential lot and to establish a unified development plan with requested relaxations from the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The property owners are also requesting concurrent construction of buildings and the subdivision infrastructure as outlined for Planned Unit Developments in Section 16.22.030 "Completion of Improvements" of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and Section 18.50.030.D "Water and Sanitary Sewer System Requirements" in the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The subject property is legally described as the E'/: W'/z SE'/4 SW/, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana, and generally located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. The property is preliminarily approved for "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) zoning. Approval of the Subdivision Planned Unit Development application would allow a relaxation of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations Section 16.16.080 "Paving Requirements" to allow construction of the private streets to less than the adopted city standards for the driving/parking lane and sidewalk widths and the for a sidewalk system to be constructed without a boulevard. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development application would allow the relaxation of the following sections of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district; b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty foot front yard setback; d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback; e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback; f) 18.50.110.13 "Stall,Aisle and Driveway Design"to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway ��� - stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet; and g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side - =-- B-2 Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to ----------------- seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot ----- side yard setback. Pro rt BP Public testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written P� Y comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT R --- 59771-1230. Data pertaining to the application may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, R- R-1 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). �,..,..._._.. #Z-03132 Baxter Square Zoning Preliminary Plan PUD R-3 #P-03020 Baxter Square MaSub Preliminary Plat PUD Bo2�, CI&Y OF BOZEMAN IWARTMENT OF PLANNING AND MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT U 'Z. * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406)582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 coo�� Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public meetings before the CITY OF BOZEMAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE on Tuesday,July 8,2003,at 10:00 a.m. and the CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD on Tuesday, July 8, 2003 at 3:30 p.m., to discuss a Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development. Both meetings are to be held in the Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, 20 East Olive Street, Bozeman, Montana. Further notice is given of a public meeting before the CITY OF BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD on Tuesday, August 5, 2003, to discuss a Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat application. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, August 11, 2003, to consider both the Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development application and the Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat application for Baxter Square Planned Unit Development to be held at 7:00 p.m., in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana The applications would allow the property owners Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, Montana 59741 and Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, Montana 59718 represented by C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59718, to subdivide18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots and one single household residential lot and to establish a unified development plan with requested relaxations from the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The property owners are also requesting concurrent construction of buildings and the subdivision infrastructure as outlined for Planned Unit Developments in Section 16.22.030 "Completion of Improvements" of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and Section 18.50.030.1) "Water and Sanitary Sewer System Requirements" in the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The subject property is legally described as the E'/Z W'/2 SE'/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana, and generally located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. The property is preliminarily approved for "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) zoning. Approval of the Subdivision Planned Unit Development application would allow a relaxation of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations Section 16.16.080 "Paving Requirements" to allow construction of the private streets to less than the adopted city standards for the driving/parking lane and sidewalk widths and the for a sidewalk system to be constructed without a boulevard. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development application would allow the relaxation of the following sections of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district; b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty foot front yard setback; d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback; e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback; f) 18.50.110.B "Stall,Aisle and Driveway Design"to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet; and g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side --- -- B-2 o Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up toF7:- ,.+ seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side and setback. y Sub ect " _� Pr ert BP Public testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written p y comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT R 3 II` 59771-1230. Data pertaining to the application may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, R R-1 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of .Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). iY #Z-03132 Baxter Square Zoning Preliminary Plan PUD R-3 #P-03020 Baxter Square MaSub Preliminary Plat PUD I . F®ITNDA.TION REPORT 1 1 Townhouses & 8-Plexes; Baxter Square Subdivision Phase I (Lots 1-30), Phase 3 (Lots 56-74 and 85-90) 1 � Section 35, TIS, R5E Gallatin County, MT . I For: 1 Baxter Square Partners Attn: Ami Grant & Voss Bowman 3 .7 Sanders Avenue Bozeman, MT 59718 I1 �I Prepared By: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. II 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 (406) 587-1115 f February 7, 2004 Project No. 0.2395.2 �i i February 5, 2004 Baxter Square Partners Ami Grant &Voss Bowman 317 Sanders Avenue Bozeman, MT 59718 tl RE: Geotechnical Engineering-Townhouses&8-Plexes;Baxter Square Subdivision,Phase I(Lots 1-30), Phase 3 (Lots 56-74 and 85-90) (02395.1) Dear Ami &Voss, The general scope of this project was as for C&H Engineering to make foundation design P P J b recommendations for the residential home sites referenced above. Geotechnical services have been performed as requested in the proposal for engineering services dated January 15, 2004. C&H Engineering arrived on site at 9:00 a.m.on January 31,2004 to observe,record,sample and test the sub-grade soils excavated. A total of seven test holes were excavated. The Test Hole Log(s)and '! the Test Hole Location Map can be found in Appendix C. The site is a valley meadow with an old railroad grade,running east-west,which bisects the property. This is the most significant visible land feature along with the wetland areas. Delineated wetlands will be incorporated into the open space and park areas of the project and should be minimally impacted. The following description utilizes the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS)visual '! classification t identify the oils found, which are given in parentheses. Furthermore after f n system to d rfy soils f n , � analyzing field data, test result and correlating them to the Natural Resources and Conservation i Service(NRCS)data it has been determined that the site consists primarily of three major horizor_s. The following paragraph is a general overview of the subsurface soils and conditions across_the site which was derived from the Test Pit Logs. ' It is estimated that at the time of excavation the frost depth was approximately 1 inch thick. The upper P PP Y PP horizon of the soil profile consisted of topsoil which was found to be 12 inches thick on the southerly end of the prof ect and increasing to 30 inches on the north side. The topsoil is a dark silt loam(M ) with no gravels observed. The root density was highest in the upper 5 inches and diminished with depth usually ending an inch or two beyond the topsoil layer. Underlying the topsoil a horizon of ' silt/clay loam(ML-CL)was observed. The silty clay soil was approximately 4 feet thick on the south side of the project increasing to 6 1/2 feet on the north and north easterly end. Under the silt/clay horizon"pit run"sandy/gravel with some cobbles (GP)soils was found. Depth of the pit run soils ' was not determined due to groundwater however from past experience it is assumed to be a significant depth. The pit run was tightly packed and difficult to excavate. The largest cobbles observed had-a 6 inch diameter. The ground water is confined by the silt/clay loam (ML-CL) horizon. The clay mineral content in the soil decreases slightly P with depth. Ground water levels are expected to p fluctuate seasonally. End of excavation was due to increased difficulty excavating through the gravels and groundwater. The soil profile matches well with the data obtained from the United States Natural Resources and Conservation Services (MRCS). The MRCS soil mapping units and names are 510B, 50B, Meadowcreek and Blackdog Loam respectively. The NRCS soils map and engineering index properties for the site are attached. Comparing the MRCS's Physical Properties of the soils data with the Test Hole Logs, it is accurate to assume that silt/clay soils make up the majority of the soil constituents in the upper 5 feet across the site. Blackdog Loam dominates the site and has the higher percentage of clay then the Meadowcreek. The percentage of clay in Blackdog Loam from 0 - 60 '! inches below grade(as given by the MRCS and observed in the field),can vary from 20%-35%. The Blackdog Loam soils have a low moderate shrink-swell potential,therefore with the recommended subgrade improvements settlement is expected to be within tolerable limits for the proposed load (estimated of< %inch). Based on the test pit information and utilizing the-2000 International Building Code(IBC),the soil ' profile type required would be classified as D,providing that all footings bear on properly compacted stiff subsurface soils as a minimum. Because of the proximity of the creek and wetlands to the proposed building sites and the presence of groundwater in the test holes, a sump pump/pit is recommended to de-water the site during t' construction (as needed). The results of this study indicate that the proposed structure may be supported by conventional spread and continuous wall foundations. Suitable load bearing,native gravelly soils were found 5 and 8 feet below grade on the south and north sides of the site respectively. The desired footing elevation can be achieved by bringing up the grade with 3/4 inch washed rock or approved,compacted engineered fill. The exterior footings should be protected from frost action and the normal depth of frost protection is 4 feet. A.moderately large, ride behind, sheeps foot compactor is the preferred piece of compaction equipment to be used for the conditions and soils observed. Under no circumstances should footings or floor slabs be established on non-engineered fill or on top-soils. Placed fill must rest on properly prepared(compacted)native soils in the footing and floor slab areas. The engineered fill can be 3/4 inch minus washed rock as mentioned above(no compaction needed) or well graded, 3 inch minus pit run with no more then 20%consisting of non plastic fines(compact-smooth drum ' vibratory compactor). It is recommended that all foundation sub-surfaces be observed by the Engineer prior to the placement of foundation forms. Because groundwater is typically present at the footing ' depth, it is recommended that a internal sump pump be installed to keep crawl spaces dry. It is assumed that a sump pump,perimeter drain system may have better results then j ust a perimeter drain given the site conditions. The sump pump should be designed so to function year round and be easily accessible. The recommended allowable soil bearing pressure is 2,500 lbs/fe for all footings bearing on properly ' prepared (compacted) native soils, overlain with the recommended washed rock or compacted engineered fill. Typical strip footings for this proj ect should have a minimum width of 18 inches and column footings should have a minimum width of 3 0 inches.S ee Typical Foundation Detail Attached. I If you require further engineering services or have any questions please feel free to give me a call. 1 Thank you. Sincerely, Andy V. Pilskalns, P.E. ' Geotechnical Engineer Enc. Appendixes G-.\c&t'.02\02395\02395.2\foundation letter.wpd 11 1� 1 1� 1� 1� 1 - 1 1 6.0 REFERENCES INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2000,By INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. Copyright©2000, Publication Date: March 2000, Chapter 16, Section 1615 Earthquake Loads - ' Site Ground Motion UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM, 1986. VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS, ' Manual No. 5, Amster K. Howard, Bureau of Reclamation Engineering and Research Center AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM).ASTM,, D1557, D4318, ' Standard Test Methods for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils and Soil Aggregate. Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Platicity Index of Soils, respectively. DESIGN FOR FROST- PROTECTION SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT, NAHB Research Center, Upper Marlboro, MD '! PRINCIPLES OF FOUNDATION ENGINEERING Second Edition © 1990 b PWS-KEN > Y Publishing Company-Braja M. Das GENERAL GEOLOGY FOR ENGINEERS, © 1.998 by Prentice-Hall Inc.,Alan E. Kehew ! CIVIL ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL, Seventh Edition, Michael R. Lindeburg, Copyright© 1999 Professional Publications Inc. , SOIL SURVEY OF THE GALLATIN COUNTY AREA , MONTANA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, USDA,NATURAL RESO URCES AND CONSER VATION SERVICE, NRCS MONTANA GROUND-WATER INFORMATION CENTER, GWIC,Montana Bureau of Mines & Geology, Montana Tech University of Montana, 1300 West Park Street, Main Hall 322, Bute Montana, 59701-8997 i i ' NOTES: �i �1 'i 'i i l APPENDIX LIST 1 1 Appendix A 2000, IBC Spectral Response Map(s), Appendix B Site Location Map(s) i Appendix C Test Dole Log(s) Soil Test Result(s) i Appendix D Foundation Detail(s) 'I Appendix E MRCS Soil Information �f Appendix F C & H Responsibility Clause 1 1 1 1 1 1 � APPENDIX A ' 2000 IBC Spectral Response b4ap(5) Baxter Square Sub., Phase 1 3 GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA TABLE 1615.1.1 SITE CLASS DEFINITIONS _ —0.PROPEnT1E0 tN TOP 100 N.L AS Pan SECTION 1.1a.1.a `1 r L `•- 39TE SOIL PBOfILE Sell"'*1' 51arMard gn.brtbn Boll Pndnln.d LA CBB N AME rNoclry,r.,(Nr) r..lr Nnea,ll tMar slrwlp0.,y,fP.O A Hard-rock v,>5,000 Na applicable Not,ppllcablc .—J II Rock 2,500<v,c 5,000 Not applicable Not applicable C C v d—soil and son mck 1.2oo<v S zso0 A>so i>_2.000 I de 600<v<1,200 is< <so 1000<752000 E Son soil profile 1<600 A<Is a,<1.000 Any profile with more than)0 feel orsoil having the following ehanaaistics: L — 1.Plasticity ind,.Pf>20; - 2,Moisrste content w>_40%,and ) 3.Undraioed she...sogth a <s00, L' Any profile eo., nine soih),.vina ono or mm.of 010 following ehsranterisa": - - 46 oten 1.Soils vulnerable to ptial fvlwe or eollspso underseismle loastiog weh as 13 li0pst'.blc soils,quick and highly aauilirc clays,104.psibls weakly cemented ao(Is. f F — 2.Pew and/or highly organic clays(H>10 feet of peat anNor highly organic clay • where H.rhicle css of soil) 3.Very high plasticity,stays(H>25 feet with plasticity index Pf>75) J d.Very thick soft/enedimn stiff clays(if>120 ft / For 31:1I-3O1.g r-1aqu 1 t-0.0929ro',1 p tur peed e,ape fq1-0.os 79 kPA ) 6 M' 350 2000 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING COD& � ��• , 45' ,S0 20 0 � Z 44P D v _ _ 44a r ' CD 7 . z _ 0 FIGURE '1615(5) 0 MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION FOR v rl a REGION 2 OF 0.2 SEC SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELE11ATION (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING), SITE CLASS B ENGINEERING AND FOR: Am! Grant & Voss Bowrr?an SURVEYING, INC.. Ss = 105 .Civil Engineering Structural Engineering .Land Surveying 205 Edelweiss Drive Bozeman, Montana. 59710 (406)587-1115•Fox:(406)507-9768-info@cliengineers.com ' Sheet 9 of > #02395.2(ln-tern otional) Baxt r- Square SubdMW6n, Phase Y & 3 _ TABLE 1015.1.1 SITE CLASS DEFINITIONS - - - 29 AVERAGE PROPCAlIES IN TOP too r..l Ag PEA SECnON Ia10.1j 2 9 SITE SOIL PROFILE goo ah«r wrr. 0rartd.rd gn,tr.tloq 'Go0 undnlnad 1 '- -• - .:"30 NAME wlod ,v,(Na raal.l.nc.,N -twr-bwt tR L.1P-0 A Hu4•roek v,>5,000 No1 applicable Not oppli able 1 D Rock 2,500<v,<5,000 .Not oppli..ble Not applicable C V< dense mil and soft rock 1,200<v<2,500 R>50 7>2,000 u v 6 mil Profile 600<v51200 155Reso 1000<752000 J E Soil,Gil rot v,<600 R<15 T.c 1.000 Tt,, 1J L Any profile with more than 10 feet of,oil having the following chanaerhtics: 4 1.Plasticity index Pf>20; , is 2.Moismm content w 2:40%,and 2.Uadr,ln,d shear mmgGl F.<100 ,f LMy profile containing soils having one or more of sha following characteristics: v �1~ 1.Soil,-In to poteod.l failure or-lisp.under aci—I.loading.ueh as 1 ; liquefiable soil,,grdek and highly,m.itive clays,collapsible weakly cemented sails. j .i r r`• — 2.Pe.0 and/or highly osg:mip clays(H>10 feet of our anNor highly Omani.clay or o whore It of soil) / \ 5.Very high pludeity eI.ys(Hf 25 fact wish pl.srictty,indca Pf>75) 4,Very ehiek.oNm,dium stiff,lay,(H>120 A) �J ! Fo,SI:1 foe-504.a recto.1 aquae!-0.0929 m',1 pound per pout foot-0.0a79 45 050 2000 INTERNATIONAL 13VILDING COOE'e 1 + 5a- -} 443 34 2 _�— 46 - FIGURE 16.15(6) MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION FOR REGION 2 OF 1.0 SEC SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (5'PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING), SITE CLASS B For: Ami Grant & Voss Bowman GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA r(CeJU E'1VGINE'L7�ING AND '�1 '�,5 SURVEYING, INC. •Civil Engineering a Structural Engineering •nand Surveying 205 Edelweiss Drive Dozeman, Montana 59710 (406)507-1115 a Fax:(406)567-9760 a info@chengineers.com Sheet .1 of #02395.2(In-tern ational) 1 ' APPENDIX B Location Map(s) ■ i i EAXTER SQUARE SUBDIVISION P.UD. ® PHASE I 1 i VICINITY MAP I Briid ileee 'Py i !+ I Bete.Reel � QQ o+e wP B•/n R•ea�� IN (n ri pp� J a ! 'Baxter Cane _ mid 9 � � oe St a.r. F �t 5 SM Sl i �J< — ——— o f .� p a T it 3� o � St i y^e+n�0❑ Tamorack �0 4� 0 ❑o ❑ ate,, < �St — C �1 Durston Rd, " L J L J a ,c,,C�00 0[0]❑El p, L aa� 13120. IIIII I I� UGZ r ''nJ� �0� i l�a .a.aw � l�Lp;L9®Men enh°II 1S��t'��r'L��OOn(�h "" + _ t W. Main St. 9®©[3= ❑OOU❑=LJLJMJ Baficock $t. �OyORanb k S0�������°S S _ L7 I I L" I ❑ d ��l.����C.rae.".s�tJ©❑OC ❑���+a„s,Lg� pqY I e i EIL G _ uu �C 1,9 N ❑❑ono 0000009n.Q00000_00000000-1900000 H � N U.S. 191 W. College St.'ab � L _J ©I—�l_❑��� O❑Cleve and 00 °e Pmd Rd b Ig" n NOT TO SCALE J 5 O ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. Md�ivil Engineering •Structural Engineering •Land Surveying 5 Edelweiss Drive Bozeman, Montana 59718 6)587-1115•Far:(406)587-9768•inloCchen;ineers.com � APPENDIX C Test Hole Map & Logs Soil Test Results I i IbItT LIOLE LOC ION / AP----------I ---------------------------------------------------I 1 BAXTER SQUARE SUBDIV. P.U.D. TOWNHOUSES AND 8 PLEXES TRACT A 212104 I i I es,u ua , � ! I ----------------I- I s LOT 1 I I II II i II i I u I I I I I i i I TRACT!C-1 LOT 2 I I oc 1� i I I � I I � I I TRACT C-1 /� I I I HAS LOT i- "� TO I I I — .; I I ' a � P �� �'�• PAWH > ��r I i I= I I I LOT.4 ;j I I ! I I i I I i I I ! II LOT 5 I I TH n I I TH !3 I I I •- I I LOT aEL n I ! I I � I � I I I N I ------------X-i W T LOT 7 I I n I I 1 I $ I I ! I I i I I I I 1 I ! I TH '1 I n I ! : Scale: 1 —200 II ---------------- I ---------------- L_EG EN D TH j 1 INDICATES APPROX. ENGINEERING AND e TEST HOLE LOCATION if(C(C�H SURVEYING, INC. •Civil Engineering •Structural Engineering •land Surveyuig 205 Edelweiss Drive Bozeman,Montana 59716 (406)587-1115•Paz:(406)587-9768•info@chengineers.com Sheet 1 of 1 #0 2 39 5.2(TH) C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING. INC: TEST HOLE LOG I PROJECT: Baxter Square Sub.Div. PROJECT#: 02395.2 } HOLE: Test Pit# 1 CONFIRMATION#: I LOCATION: Baxter Lane COUNTY: Gallatin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35,T1S,R5E DATE: 03/24/03 RECORDED BY: AVP DRILL METHOD: Case 420 EXCAVATOR: Bill Eddy Excavation TOTAL DEPTH: 6.5 Feet DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION ' -- 0" Dark Brown siltyloam topsoil with very few gravels 5% . Low density,medium plasticity,no dominant P rY gravels,( ) Y� P Y, i structure,soft,very few organics(roots),fine grained-silty organic soil, (OL). 1' 12" Start of tan clay soils with some silt,moderate"in situ"strength,medium to high toughness,dilatancy-slow, high plasticity,very few organics(roots),high cohesive characteristics,medium stiffness,moderate to high adhesive characteristics. Estimated f 90%of material pass No.4 sieve. Moisture content increasing with 2' depth.No cobbles found. No gravels found,USCS-(CL). Soils have low permeability characteristic. ' Estimated that 95%of material passes through No. 200 Sieve. 3' 4' r 5' 60" Soil through depth same as found above except for observed change in moisture content. Ground water ' observed at 5 feet below to of bank. Approximate thickness of clay loam soils are 4.S feet. P PP Y , 6' 72" Same soils as found above with increase in saturation of silts. Start of sandy saturated gravels and cobbles. " o 0 0 0 78 USCS -(GP) 10/o fines,30/o sand,40/o gravels 20/o cobbles. End of Excavation,due to Groundwater. Permeability of gravels high, groundwater rises to 2.5 feet below grade for this time of year. See test hole ' T logs from 01-31-04 to see that during the winter period the groundwater is lower. I I ' 9' I 10, I ' 11' 12 ' G:\c&h\02\02395\02395.2\TESTLOG-1.uPd i C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING. INC: TEST HOLE LOG 2 PROJECT: Baxter Square Sub. Div. PROJECT#: 02395.2 HOLE: Test Pit#2 CONFIRMATION#: ' LOCATION: Baxter Lane COUNTY: Gallatin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35,T1S,R5E DATE: 03/24/03 RECORDED BY: AVP DRILL METHOD: Case 420 �I EXCAVATOR: C&H Engineering TOTAL DEPTH: 6.5 Feet DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION ' -- 0" Topsoil,dark brown in color,with a high quantity of silts and some organic matter. Root density thickest in top 7 inches diminishing with depth. Texture is very smooth, -silty organic soil,USCS (ML). High plasticity,low cohesion,moderately high adhesion. 14" Start of tan silty clay soils,USCS Classification-(ML-CL). Moderate"in situ"bank strength,soils are stiff however the moisture content increases and penetration resistance diminishes with depth. See TH-5 for representative penetration results. No cobbles or gravels found,soils have low permeability characteristic, moderately high plasticity,slow dilatancy, flower smooth texture. 2' 24" End of root zone. 1 3' Y I 4' 48" Moderately slow dilatacy,moderate to high plasticity as seen above. Same silty clayey soils. No gravels or cobbles noticed. Assumed that 95%material can pass the number 200 sieve. ?' 60" Start of gravels,USCS Classification-(GP). Pit run is very stiff. Difficulty digging. 6' 72" Ground water observed. The water level has come up about 4 inches since penetrating into gravels 1 foot dep I. 78" End of excavation. Pit run material very stiff. Water table prohibits further excavation. . Suitablematerial for load bearing. 71 I " 9' I 10' I 11' 1 12' ' G:\c&h\02\02395\02395 2\TESTLOG-2.wpd C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING. INC. TEST HOLE LOG 3 PROJECT: Baxter Square Sub. Div. PROJECT#: 02395.2 HOLE: Test Pit#3 CONFIRMATION#: LOCATION: Baxter Lane COUNTY: Gallatin ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35 TIS R5E DATE: 03/24/03 RECORDED BY: AVP DRILL METHOD: Deere 'I EXCAVATOR: C&H Engineering TOTAL DEPTH: 7 Feet DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION -- As seen in TP-2 topsoil approx. 12" thick, dark brown in color,with a high quantity-of silts and some organic matter.Texture is very smooth,-silty organic soil,USCS (OL). High plasticity,low cohesion,moderately 1' 12" high adhesion. Start of stiff silty clay loam soils,moderate to high bank,strength. No cobbles or gravels ' observed,95% to 100%passing no. 200 sieve,USCS-(ML-CL). I 24" End of root zone. Same soils as seen above. USCS-(ML-CL). Obvious that moisture content is increasing slightly with depth. Decrease in shear and penetration resistance. I 3' 36" Tan silty clay loam. Low cohesion,makes ribbon easily,flour smooth texture. Very similar to material seen on the other test holes. I ' 4' 48" Slow dilatancy,same material as seen above. I ' S' 60" USCS Classification,(ML-CL). It is assumed that the clay content is between 10%- 15%. Soils have weak i cohesive strength,high adhesive strength. ' 6' 72" Start of gravels. Very stiff and excavation is difficult. Again ground water appears about 6 inches into the gravels. USCS Classification,(GP). ' T 84" End of excavation. Pit run material very stiff. Water table prohibits further excavation. Suitable material for load bearing. 8' I 9 I 10, 11' . i 12' ' G:\c&h\02\02395\02395.2\TESTLOG-3.%vpd I 1' C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC: TEST HOLE LOG 4 1 PROJECT: Baxter Square Sub. Div. PROJECT#: 02395.2 I HOLE: Test Pit#4 CONFIRMATION#: i 'I LOCATION': Baxter Lane COUNTY: Gallatin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35,T1S,R5E DATE: 03/24/03 j RECORDED BY: AVP DRILL METHOD: Deere 'I EXCAVATOR: C&H Engineering TOTAL DEPTH: 10 Feet DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION -- 0" Topsoil,top 1 inch maybe frozen. Very little moisture in upper 24 inches of topsoil. Same type of soil j as seen in all the previous test holes. I 1' I � 2' 24" End of topsoil. Start of brown silty clay loam,USCS Classification(ML-CL). 26" End of root zone. ' 3' 36" Same soils as seen above. USCS -(ML-CL). Soils have good bank strength,no embankment failure seen during excavation of any test hole.on site. Soils brown color slowly diminishes into a greyish green brown. ' 4' 4 It is assumed that the clay content has decreased slightly with depth.8 Greenish grey silty clay loam. Moderately high cohesion,makes ribbon,flour smooth texture. i ' 5' 60" Dilatancy is faster then what was observed in the silty clays which is assumed to be due to a higher content of organics within the silts. USCS Classification(ML) 'l 6' 72" USCS Classification,(ML). It is assumed that the clay content is between 7% - 12%. Soils have weak cohesive strength,high adhesive strength. Some rot odor noticed. I 7' 84" 95%passing 200 sieve. Same soils as found above however with slightly more moisture. Reduction of shear and penetration resistance. Soft and easy excavating. Soil is extracted in cohesive bucket size.pieces. ' 8' 96" Start of gravels. Very stiff and excavation is again difficult. Again ground water appears about 6 inches into t � rY b b '�' PP o gravels. USCS Classification,(GP). 9 108 Same gravelly soils as seen above with water mixed in making it difficult to determine the content of fines. i 10' 112" End of excavation. Pit run material very stiff. Water table prohibits further excavation. Suitable material for load bearing. � 11' t I 1' G:\c&h\02\02395\02395.2\TESTLOG-4.wpd 1 C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC: TEST HOLE LOG 5 q 1 PROJECT: Baxter Square Sub. Div. PROJECT#: 02395.2 HOLE: Test Pit#5 CONFIRI'IATION#: ' LOCATION: Baxter Lane COUNTY: Gallatin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec.35,T1S,R5E DATE: 01/31/04 RECORDED BY: AVP DRILL METHOD: John Deere ' EXCAVATOR: C&H Engineering TOTAL DEPTH: 8 Feet DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION 1 -- 0" Dark Brown silty loam topsoil with very few gravels. Moderate low density,medium to high plasticity soft,high volume of organics(root mat),very fine grained-silty organic soil,(ML). Topsoil layer very dry, stiff with depth. Penetration Test at lfo6t depth(PT-1)is 7 tons/ft . .71 yl 30 Start of tan silt,moderate"in situ strength,medium to high toughness,dilatancy-slow,high plasticity significant decrease of organics(roots), medium stiffness,moderate to high adhesiveness,low cohesiveness. Estimated=98%of material pass No.200 sieve. Moisture content increasing with depth,no cobbles found, no gravels found,USCS-(ML). Soils have low permeability characteristic. PT-2 is 7.5 tons/ft2. 3' 36" Same Soils as found above. PT-3 is 8 tons/ft'. 1 . W 48" Same soils as found above with noticeable slight increase in the moisture content. PT-4 is 10=tons/ft'-. 1 i5' 60" Again increase in moisture content however appears to be greater then the optimum. Silty loam with clay,darker grey with small veins of golden brown silt. Approximate thickness of silt clay loam soils are 4.5 feet. Slow dilatancy and PT-5 has reduced to 7.5 tons/ft'. 1 6' 72" Few small gravels starting to appear,silty loam(dark grey)with clay binder. High plasticity,high adhesivenes and it from the penetration test the moisture content has reduced the shear and penetration resistance significantly,PT-6 has reduced to 2.5 tons/ft'. ' 7' 84" Start of gravels,"pit run". Very difficult excavating. Start of ground water,just prior to gravels PT-7 has reduced to 1.8 tons/ft'. I 8' 96" Gravels with sand and some cobbles(GP). End of excavation due to groundwater. Slow permeability. 1� 9 1 10, II 11' l 12' i G:\c&h\02\02395\02395 2\TESTLOG-5.wpd C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING. INC: TEST HOLE LOG 6 PROJECT: Baxter Square Sub. Div. PROJECT#: 02395.2 i HOLE: Test Pit#6 CONFIRMATION#: LOCATION: Baxter Lane COUNTY: Gallatin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35,T1S,R5E DATE: 03/24/03 RECORDED BY: AVP DRILL METHOD: Case 420 EXCAVATOR: Bill Eddy Excavation TOTAL DEPTH: 6.5 Feet DEPTH" SOIL DESCRIPTION -- Dark Brown silty loam topsoil with very few gravels,(2%).Low density,medium plasticity,no dominant ' stiucture;soft,very few organics(roots),fine grained-silty organic soil,(OL). 27 inches thickness. 1 l 1 2, 27" Start of tan clay soils,moderate"in situ"strength,medium to high toughness,dilatancy-slow,high 3' plasticity,very few organics(roots),high cohesive characteristics,medium stiffness,high adhesive characteristics. Estimated±97%of material pass No.200 sieve. Moisture content increasing with 1 depth.. USCS- (CL). Soils have very low permeability characteristic. W 48" Stiffness of soils increasing with depth. 'I 5' 60" Same material as seen above. Soil stiffness increasing with depth. 6' 72" Soils becoming less stiff then seen above as moisture content increases with depth,capillary rise effects. 78" Soils same as found above except for observed change in moisture content. Ground water observe 1 at 5.5 feet below top of bank. Approximate thickness of clay soils are 3 feet. Digging difficulty increase 7' when excavating gravels. Permeability of gravels high. Start of sandy saturated gravels and cobbles. 1 Start of sandy saturated gravels and cobbles. US CS-(GP) l 81 1 91 l I 10, 1 12' G.\c&h\021A2395\0239"�.2\TESTLOG-6.wpd 1 . C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING. INC: TEST HOLE LOG 7 1 l PROJECT: Baxter Square Sub. Div. PROJECT#: 02395.2 HOLE: Test Pit#7 CONFIRMATION#: tLOCATION: Baxter Lane COUNTY: Gallatin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35,T1S,R5E DATE: 03/24/03 RECORDED BY: AVP DRILL METHOD: Deere EXCAVATOR: Bill Eddy Excavation TOTAL DEPTH: 8 Feet DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION t -- Dark Brown silty loam topsoil. (ML-OL). Not that many organics however,moderate high plasticity. Soils not as stiff as other topsoil layers due to it's proximity to creek or abandoned irrigation ditch just to the ' north. Moisture content however below optimum. I1' 12" Same soils as found above. Low moisture content. 2' 24" End of topsoil,start of light soft tan silt with just a bit of clay acting as binder. Very loose,penetration value ' 28"' low-2.5 tons/ft . End of root zone,moisture content slightly higher then what was found in top soil. USCS(ML) 3' 36" Tan silts diminish to grey silt with clay. Low permeability,slow dilatancy,high plasticity. Increase in penetration test results to 4 tons/fe.USCS(NM) 4' 48" Same silty clay soils as seen above. Weep noticed on west end of test pit. High volume of water entering. ' the seep,appears that there is a small veinwhich is confined from above and below that water conducts thr ug . This scenario must be common in this area. 'I 5' 60" Same silty clay soils as seen above. USCS (ML) 6' 72" Start of gravels and cobbles, USCS- (GP) 1' 71 84„ Gravels as seen above. 8' 96" End of Excavation,in gravels. Groundwater ponding at bottom of hole. ' 9' 1 10, 11 i 12' G:\cdch102',02395\02395 \TESTLGG-7.wpd C&H ENGINEERING AIND SURVEYING. INC. 205 Edelweiss Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 ' Phone(406)587-1115 O Fax(406) 587-9768 email: info@chengineers.com I i ,1 Job No: 02395 Project: Baxter Square Sub. t Location Sampled: Phase 1 & 3 Material Type: Silt/clay Tested By: AVP 1 t ?gate Sampled: 01-31-04 r- Weather: Partially clear sky,25' I 1 l MOISTURE CONTENT 1 Tare Name "In Situ" "In Situ" "In Situ" ' TP=2-4'-6" TP-3 -6-0" TP-4-7-6" Total Sample+Tare (wet) 98.68 91.4 89.52 ' Weight of Tarre(grams) 20.68 20.3 22.1 Total Sample+Tare (Dry) 81.9 76.5 75.0 Weight of Dry Soil (grams) 61.22 56.2 52.9 Weight of Water(grams) 16.78 14.9 14.52 Moisture Content% 27.4 26.5 27.4 1 1 office/forms/moisture i C&H ENGINEERING AIND SURVEYING, INC. 205 Edelweiss Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 ' Phone(406)587-1115 0 Fax(406) 587-9768 email: info@chengineers.com i l ' Job No: 02395 Project: Baxter Square Sub. Location Sampled: Phase 1 & 3 Material Type: Silt/clay Tested By: AVP Date Sampled: 01-31-04. Weather: Partially clear sky, 25' I `I 'I MOISTURE CONTENT ' Tarre Name In Situ" 1n Sits:" 4 TP-5 =4'-0" TP-7-6-0" ' Total Sample+Tarre(wet) 75.45 96.92 Weight of Tarre(grams) 22.2 22.22 ' Total Sample+Tarre(Dry) 65.49 75.61 Weight of Dry Soil (grams) 43.29 21.31 Weight of Water (grams) 9.96 53.39 Moisture Content% 23 39 tI office/forms/moisture ( i I CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO Ir Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) 1 � 12.0 - I I 10 0 —+—Bearing Ratio of Soaked _ C Sample(C3R) I 8.0 1 n 6.0 I I I �olnt 4.0 I i I ,D 1 0.0 ! I 85.0 90.0 95.0 1.00.0 105.0 110.0 115.0 Dry Density as Molded(PCF) i 80.0 1 150.0 i--------------------- _ ...............................-----------.-•---..-.---------•----•----..-----••------._------.---•--•--- vi20.G €............. ' =-----------:.._.......-------------•-••----_.......... --•-----------•-•--------- :........................... ................................................ N 90.0 ----••--•--••--•-.---------•--•--:..---••--- ' y V _ 00.0 �................. ............................................................................... 30A C 0.0 U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 o r) o 'r o N :� n c -r C+7 6. o 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 ' ASTM:. D698 Maximum Dry Density: 105.3 Optimum Moisture: 18.5% 1 TEST RESULTS Point!#1 Point T2 Point T3 ATT=RBERG LIMITS j Percent of Maximum Dry Density 94.8/ .'' LIQUID LIMIT'�z f'-u^��,�rrE6 yx.�`ti�.sJ;,Y,•i-^-i:�.'`'k'�i' Dry Density As Molded(pcf) -9.8 `�'- °�-a�,��=� PLASTIC LIMIT � I _.cam==T�9-:��c{s`:'i7..)I_r.F.�S:�x.....rr..c^u`Y — t .Y�-�2•i?t^_'1%$�j.-��:u....,�,f,'tt•'.�„i^'iNi�:a i Dry Density A*ter 96 Hour Soaks cr 99.1 '<? r2"r'7°' ===E PLAS I I'C INDEX ,p �' 1!V:61_1^'�4'...r>'al6;;w?%s .:.s:;1! •r ; !1 � a.. a •.�N.-.ry;'l:tC.:���}�i�✓���c,?n�sC`�:-:r,�'..'�'�"f.'�.^is:'^'!-'•'cW';e�E:j1"''"-�^' i; Moisture Con ent(%): S ,. �>!xv:,w`h°�•,`.;! w�'.�','.n..�:.7n`I"=?:�a�^u;�•=CY�.:e{a';. Before Compaction 18.9% ;� `' "' '""'$ ` CLASS!r=IC TION After Compaction 18.9% 4"q" X ' "`wr` USC.S .Too 1 After Soak 24.3% /-%„SH 10 i Average After Soak 1 22. % 14: wF= '~ r lf :y. °/ li Sw.e!!(% of Initial Height) 0.-r;° �: DE'SCJ!III I ION I 102.? Surcu „rge mount(ps�) Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) 7.1 (\vl I'�arks: �S. 1 PROJECT: C & H�PROJECT NO.: 11A231.101 U,^ B NO.: 183.16 1 LOCATION: Baxter Square SAMPLED BY: Client ' DEPTH: DATE SAMPLED: Rec. 4/1/03 REMARKS: MID - Tested by Client DATE TESTED: 4/3/2003 1 HKIVI ENGINEERING INC . 1 ' 1 � 1� 1� 1' �I 1' 'I APPENDIX D Foundation Detail(s) I TYPICAL FOUNOA, ' ION WI T'H FILL DIF T AIL 1 FLOOR AND WALL FRAMING ®AX SQUARH SUBD®V. PROPOSED GRADE TO SLOPE PHASES I AND 3 AWAY FROM FOUNDATION AT A MINIMUM OF 5% IN THE FIRST 10' IN ALL DIRECTIONS. � f--�6�L MIN i Rl LANDSCAPE—TOPSOIL i ' CRAWL SPACE 4'-0" � (TYP.) j UNDISTURBED ' NATIVE BACKFILL SOIL OR OUT FROM SUMP PUMP IMPORTED FILL j TO RETENTION POND 1 F�a1NING WALL SN 8" (TYP.) BACKFILL 6" MIN. NATIVE SILTY LOAM 0P 3/4" WASHED ROCK 0 SLOTTED PIPE BASIN OR ENGINEERED FILL 1 FL00R UOISTS NTINUOUS RIM JOIST __ === _-_ IN FROM C,0 c==z PERIMETER DRAIN NATIVE GRAVELS F NpATION WALL CIS DEPENDANT ON ELEVATION OF TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL OU G CROSS SECTION i SCALE: NTS OPT 1 REBAR (DOWELS) �O I LO 1 OUTLET �, Q I I SUMP INS .............. WITH LID :..... ... .. �Q' S ULAT 0 ....:::... _:....•....::...... e_ i c._............ �I . r: =- I BR/C O C`aaa .-1....' ... . 1 1 'e::.... "5=--:-vim''•,_-- 00 TINS LL - K °i WASHES ROCD FILL. 1 0 E 3�4 NGINtiERE I N I OR rn N. ATI co VE GRAVELS coCD LO ENGINEERING AND o SURVEYING, INC. ISOMETRIC DETAIL 1 . N -Civil Engineering •SW ctural Engineering •Lend Surveying o SCALE: NTS 1 205 Edelweiss Drive Bozeman, Montana 59718 1 06 (406)587-1115•Fax:(406)587-9768•info@chengineers.com Sheet 1 of 1 #02395.2(FD1 F) 1 L 1 1 1' 1' 1 I � APPENDIX E NRCS Soils) Infomtation I • o 0 N 7 c >- (v Co 9 � r Ln N V tU J ~ } N O O O O A ' ` I ;:�..-`i;Sf? .(;4�s y:.?, _.,� ,c ar.2�^ta-)iNti'�. ;�'.. -,.x':2�r' -�..�� tl:" L...a. _ :...rrv: -,xecx-I .�+.ra�.n, u 7..�, y�', ff-.+'fQIt� =. .w.a }Y'u' .xl•.i.:"^ I 1y: e. `� R••�,r-'�_ �'A�C'Y-�` n°'� IJ.�7F"' �R'•. $���.y,,XiYy^ �6^fi�� "'2,-.�_•A��„��. � ,;p,H'��.(s'.&�e"`u ss� i� ^h��.��' rw- y 615 _ . F'- -"j''1' r, 'fir,;"^" fie. �����'i�.- �•t}"�.t-tt..'•� �m'-<�s�^ 'Y'r ?f t ! - -gar"`• 1 �r�--- 4 � �"'.�-a 1.�'Ar t: 4�i�"'-"t'" T3°-'J �.::_ ��J7a �' G �. '-.a �u�� y 4 .r��•i�,�'til ���,"�"�'ry Ib�L"r.,c�•tw� �w� w ��[ ' j>c. � fr✓':Lr"l�'i�w.�r��r?'`�'��£� Ty�*� 'a�21M�1r r��z1��.n'� '' {a� '� � `�w _ � car" '� t�'"�=,^••f.� �£,� t7 .�-,>` �'.r � .� �' ,a'..e•._. ol::':sai?S-+`�s n .tom... ,'��--."-,�,-� z- 'r -v„_ 5�� .Yfi'.:� csAw!i° da?+� w+ '�?�a-t,�"-"- .'"``1.ti;�r�''",.`.,,;..f.�•� .Lf .• �..w-,Yyyfi=:ti:'...+r�Ps�� .� r�..�..-w�' .<,���:.�-•�,I'�L�;"•2x w,�sh..u. J"rC..-,. �I ^wa .`^-1.'''C''-�•.''--' - _ +." .,�: ,Ta �,t rQj c'$:�:,r`"'y�'^`r,.', '•; L. O �w:l�.� .. !- +ty.�y. ." '.•.^R_"�� �` ." tea._ tln ,� ' -"r tom` e. -� s+.`�' �p�_rca"'�vtyfl�,•+ "Ji'`to.'1ic^'Y `n_."�:,•.•�,:� � �s t.-,� v..r.- #-qEL�>'a hi.�t��'r.''vr��,�'� r-`31��'' � •2a �.. � +fi ,y i 'Tt��� „1• ' n��' ��c."S .Sty+•. � 'riS? �.�.x_�e;�;�•;. +�,y. i�,-"�s'"t;1'�.�'m'� ?�� �'�'`�_'��Y,�'--I�!z� 54'w�•�,^s I '•� }V/-� ff.:st�p>:'L, '4'� ',r��.�+�+�••.,_,,�,,� .....�.t 7 7y;,!'"+�y�i"n• ^ (te '` 3 01 ,•s�"�' �`-.�� � ,�C ��J V' _y� �p' a �r � Y .�f,'.,ilA`%��r�Frh•a`� '° cw• � �-`;.���-f�-° 'II ty�- ;^ �ST1+yFs44 •� LL s`"...+.� .v w •, -L:. ""7��YIk C ¢•Eer+n i�,�.��� �+1- •�y� LZ�" S 'J '�{ Y� _ = Yam. -•��'' ��ry��(b���ty��o,It�,,s"�.ty.-s�.,c'4��ti*��,t.q�c�s, n� l • ��T , A x!"v 'y - t 3� TI''' f`Zy--�-•�•"k 3 I zY � P°`�!' 1 �` //'•�� 1)•.may., ." `��'.ILe- � � � .+* .�''�'�. .' am LLJ V ' -��••.c}."`�y�+' i^ �1 1 „'�""°y;'-eF,�J_��-✓'1�...:%ui `rw«�}i-`�r��a1--qy II � - :t�'�YjXEy�S���,^..'G�Zt�'1i•`.' _•F•.:�ia ,•• �r3"'_;� y-C "6it�?•_;' F-h: t.(R p.M1;�a�!'..Th}�ja h�- '�`•�4ys� /�„'�.._ !?. 'L''Nal'rw.•• -%.^.�:. Wtit'= - 11 "gym T 'ri"ir._:1 � 43fu. iiwei.`d1J�>t E S R 1 A r c Ex p l o r e r 2.0 ---- - -----�-�.- Baxter SgUare g_ a sections --F- Soil Labels (MUSYM) tp� er�t Y -!t �•e f• -sue{. Y; q�.77+ -rtl r_:� v ,,, s J n COUnty 9'•�C� ,y'iN. 1 t� '+Y;! •3-''•�. ;V'fi• �'i �� 1 i 1 'i� �� ��•�iy�li. ;,i�� •'l� '4;{�.I,::'..g.`I +I: y `::x� roads P.. .� , r .v P � i.,,, ' �,qq,,,,,,�f :�. u. fi n'Er A y r +aft. hk e. •j }•r:. ��ie�t h. rt .'�' +2 i x A- ...�J �.r3`" :.c '`• iP`ii. 7 -5n}fF{r;t4 ,� �. � •'•. i :i.r � r, + s streams td` r ,�kIt h iP: 3fa; ! ' `: it� r�t' /^/ �ti •?1 1.. � .J�f j7` � 'i••� ;i • -e. �4v�s' y 4t #. "a- ' I' .i - ;:.= ; `' � i� f :' t IY ` -r=`l:`• szp`�`', :t'y. {•if rt 'ei. �. .�+ �r y ",',��� t ��i' r�1�1� '� ,,,w_ "?�k,tl. 5E�(. � ,( '�!, 2aac4t ,yYyy; v" p. i t a... _ Yy.?S.: "=�1ia'•tt�t� lrtl `r"�Syi. fr�� f ?,#t� '��'' "''�',:e�. J'•: ��[,,r.t,4' _ •r., '..r'_t ... ,��`�..,, .,��. .,-,a }y..C� F2:i# ��?x-C''�s:-�ri� 1:;,�:,�,rf� •t!? y' r7'.7;P :{1" � J. � t{fir,[. ��1 xT�;. 4' t p t3 �1,f,7t, :d�}:�^'.7:. „r _+�.+_5K�, .:4;M;S?I�• .��,s�F �: ta�:cO.g -k."� R�.k.i.:.. r"` ,�Fey, ^rY.$`�l {t.1'1 )t !i'�Y� '�'�.-Y�,F {,''��:',. e t, r '[.. '1 tl. :&r .� n ia �.-•,l-•,l ,.l 'r`S,rl.i' u�. x:: r :. .":y,Y `°d:',tfr r.• "!a1 ,,u ' .t,tsa fiv:T * :}`r.• :;1F {;�. cY p F. _ ;: tya{>,• Q ,./�, 1r i' 2' it � �.� .J•-':il`., .: :. •�� ,45 �.,.:. Y.:firFS 'i" �" '.'-�- - „+ithp_ ' Ilv,4;"i;�ss:hm„�,. "'d . ,�-•.;,+fr ,. '�i�.t � zr ,;.{:. :�4 �•'�s Fw, ,a. . t �.�n,'•A� �:,� ,�' ;ry5" %s'S'+.., :�S �S,• _¢¢.�� a-Yk.. r.r.i'.4.�i1':1 na,,ti-'In�:- .7 .,, ���,, ;3,Y,X.. 'p_�. l'ti5'�-.r1PL- .� ,,99..(('�'��''FF._i+.i� ..t'j' •:•rp��;31. •,r,.:`s;r,4,,, .,-��-,',�„n�;;� r�''.j]!." kl.i�: 1a�''.x U,�+,.t. }, i��. ;n; ^ `rTr'. 4��r,.� �:`''�` :.. l .g';i lr•a,l 'r;��>.(,_y,' ,Ii ;•':d'.1-.r:,:c y. �'+, !': t� ti1� .f l;. �y. +.Yl;i�';'3i•4:r. "�,;c k, 7. P ;•:J; tFfS. t' �,:d ++.. !: "� j: :Spp} a Y s• .u�.;1 " ;p:Y!, �, _ tx"4 rad. ii x1° f ! t 1-'�•I yY.3.r t/4::•t....;P.t• rft, k1 fi' � + ;:v �i' -r.a,Ys�c,x;l �:• `artate:;;a jitl:tl� .• [y _ �: �n-;.+..yam, 't Yf�f,:, r Y ! ^ •f..�. „ t'�'a.0 4 ,,tr3• �, ..f,%*}'.'^,,; r•. 0.�H' },r1x7, , q3 Ys•,.s f,; �F.h t, r .t l u .l i S t a .`b+ ! {l,.r4 Pf R t.a, •. _ ..0 Y.: 4: Y<t F",.,•ry(�: }�5,� Y 1 r tn. 7.. } tt t'}. F FM ,'¢ r f'�.i T` _:t '•.µ fit i5ur a l c. •S'.., ;cT�'. (I F ' ,..fl.. ;;f!',i.;.yfF'1::.v�t itl%,i'4i'�".rs.: ';{:.'�tj_9..!}`:qo '7J.' f:W: t f.Y nit.' �.,�Jp�,!'Si<t p;>�5., [ i' 7 .;x ," 7- 3. �. T' S�PtTs?0'�R.'t r<ir�l. t ),�"sV:•� .}t.(3jt �,,,_ C'•^ F :� t,•.a:-;,"�. .ati}.', ;�",,,f;+-{:4--���•,i�!;.:.,'>r,'. ."M. ,ii !• '��7 .a.1_ }}�j�� >!"`"<, trc6.::1 .'�R'.��"N �• •'K:* _ d s��r '.7':}tcr{ :.<<,:-(; .. (s, R l { c ; Y.r<. x. 13 t l' ik"TE .4 1� `r ,: :1-,,,4-.ti,€.3.•.;�: .>ty '� _ S>,�3. .r. 9,.,dl�.�iy�=r.^.;�� .�...1_ �l� G.,;��y'�1�"fr��..'�ti'�: ?'' fTtw _•x aE�'.� - ai?:L -�- �:�'.1€x4£ �•1�7,7;'"ty,fw'a'-t1'^j'i�^'>' ,.c�. _ •.�,: :ys><in"' �.��,,.,•. .ti,t� �.,I ;�'�><r:,,�t,:�::.':,:�', �'t. "ti<_.-,:.: ;�z'k ri:. •,.:` .a� �.4 4�. i ss•:e.'t�� fib,,fi, .� .r.,.,�_j!..t� ;' >•s. t -� #r f ',i. i ;d'.t^:•b..i.>>, 'S. •T rrz�I ,�':ft.,F• 'y.h:-',d;s:r.•;,,'. ?F.G,i - v��..3iS,.:c 9f,t.+. _ .'i r ,;;I L . r,. '}'-^t a?'f is!fl.. ,.k r�: -<!:r hrY~M:�fiy ��v,f..:;: 1- r i7,=..fiji�. ,.Ir,3t},_.. F��i�t',�' Y:..p '1���,.`��'+.v �:Jt1(J{15:.,; •:{i _.s �r k. 'a];,.L•�, ,�i. tt � i ,�_ •f., ,kC,�lr•� '�iF r .+4.d•9 I .. z: (:..c� '>d`A� v �P��t•�,:v�'PW�hT•2�,,�?r y7 i S��t:� I �..�-�.�. lt�;r•r;� ':;•�kt�•T� "�::� �; t i• '�•'•'t7F�,a�.. ';t�:Jf.: s�1'�c�� ��i',t 1,�,•, 1 � :i -: �:. '���`P�-v�� .tv;2'+.iC,Y;�a"�'6�^j -:�3: ��f 1,�,. 1r•!,�•'.t;; .iL: �i�:K Y::'f�'���;,v.., :s: .Ir'r"t ..T,. 7f"6q� �'�•r'',,t,- 4 �.rro .irit�,.. ,,r, aGi:'�i.:�,:k:e'! r:{3 _t. t'- zY}. ? eY•", �.- r' i'. G � ti•���: �f.� ti S;'' vl, • `�:�N'���-'-` ,t s?';: j.,...x` 1 7•' .�' t;,ltt.t...:�. ��^�r�' F y� •$y',�, ;,- _4 r-{. k1. ,.�d t,r'';- ppt � t. F.�.�3 .: � �� � J,� ': t�, S,.;f�.l 3. rfl f..r.�iWah'y, :`' Kk`�"' YS. P,: �es'id:d'5,. a,d•; fl' � i":' ,�'r t;.' 'ta. �:s r! ";vl'� ?€ •• 7e�a "up VE�gl.7i� m.;,r:�i;1%P �•y r,M s°t ,3. Z• - aA �t ";� ..,. �S i...� v�, r �s:r �, v.•ts H q k ?f�w , k 3 r lfi , •�`vS I, \ v - wf. °'', p .`?'3' 'Vr,i.k i�'} r t. X :[l ' 1+,?.-5,-�,>rq•ty :rK }t,ki i r r �s,.lrh''�'"...5 `,� s �. IIf �°,�, i r:1s.tit_<t.,,� :i!�,•• �p �jPV N. I t��i_;F li 4,ut5=,,.,)a1 'yb`�', " .rkR r• i'r,TJ[t •h..2y s' },CRU?. Yp e .i.yY4 fA' �: -.� %k,�" � �•"lRlt� �° ','+I.c y t :. R f,+y`a•1 k:7; {� '. t (,.ICE- 6'' •rf', .";x j�+'. ,t;_�p � �.' - ��ir�c, - �47'at�e:t'• r r 1. ,y iy stiRtt�.t �r;J,y.:. +-r''• S?t., i�•: �.,''e�. �Ettt J����aa"�:?,�: :j �f�':l�t ><i� ..:,.�t:..,�• .`f;'�i��"r.,::�,..�'.�j,d :T�ANt I. tml: •f '3rS/: .�.,t S:9;tt" kY�l}>:. i'y ;.a{, �.,. :}',.6'u. et}7,`,tl�_ 5 •t,..:t} 71;CI. r4, � .C• "Vt1.. ��'S t. 1 ,�••tt����� - g t {y,I' )`�f 11 '4 ti. 1 J .kf"'•SUrz. i�gR: �; 1�. "1•� � , �lw' � �.a � � r., t s. :'t..'A.,. . ,"E�+3Y ,i.,r �7. v •tzb 5..,•�y�� �I: 1 .� k�' si?�,=br rF a; � .r�M , ,��r t, ..�, art Q` >'rr't t � nib. : '%;F.r.X.r n 'l:a_ �.,2:fSf�}r, h' s r r'ii1',f11;a• 'F 7:' 1 ct 1['-:>;. -. E' -:•n�. v 1'- �i i ri �;t.,.i i 17+'Ya ia}' �yC,t� i >.r„''i'ti'I. y,.+ t .S t Y-a.},,! :':Y't'f��i 'ki�` -"s+'Fl•z ! rhF, c!.}��� �; 4 •t'•Ir ;�;nti`S ,�,'... 1 1 R" t; "•"ili�-t�--, Vu d„ ,L ,,. tdy a a. � �',yyltiij:. `�R n3ir•-. Ali r `-�i'�.-J t � kx.°�.:7.:z:•l!'�"F. ?��''. �i fir.-1�7.,'"• ;67! ".a�• :f i r »`, .. y l�I. a�n!; `t �.z� r h� 't ``F� t ,A lr�, +u•: 96'.�'),� f , 5�"'i.� yy+•, f �r N' t, � 1i _: . y,•: r?'�?�' r'1A 1 .- �f�+r Vs-R;` 3 �+ ram• >1 i., l q. "3 ') 'S1> N. h y r 1 !' k •.;`7: 5 �E'z { > }rk'iP t� .�'�;'s. •'tt '-Ju!3'-t, ,�; 7' .i.• =4_� r a,�I!���.5�.,u 'rL A.;� x•1,,,.: +y: "�' i� d 4a P'!- v ..�G-itiyyjy'.�'t v, � :,� � l s !1 I'a�.a' i ♦1y�i; a.. 4.: 2 �'lfizu- 9 .? 1�Y : ..,yt �\ 1•ram, ,i,?,' J •�rl'� � '�� '� ' gyp' - rr 'I'.i b i i ♦ (} - ..]. y. .(Y"t� -C'• 7'�, Z � i' 7' l ' `r:}�,:a`� _ :t. 1'f��SP.,L�IrY��� „aT.-t ?•(•}�'1' .ii �tr *.fa 't. 1. 9::fr Se` I:_ .., ir a :' •'} :r t�{ i. tdi• K ,r.u`,�-re oM.,°,gr. :rSt t. :�: }} =t*•:,,e _:t t. i,: fi. k I - w i_ `t� f.t fii.• iF, y ��t'.: r4 ;Pi r.'.1,. `c;;{i.. 1•a. r,,rK:§rr- .11 ct �'•' .C�10 Y �t=`'�Zf ]t;"- xl •,P'� '! } - ,al: �� i�l -�lr,st.'s"'1 �'".4s rr:+ ; , '; ,}�,`�t?'i, tt,,..: "3 t :x.�., 7i-'`;;. "�,1'ttt�:• '�' rtFq.`�,t ! 1. :'�... ..•ti .f, �.,i, v:,'rai�`l�ii �� �Y.,,.rU;e: .Se .�....�r,�-Ie .-i.�i, �'v"��k .t's. , "Z,' �'Psr'',tr�-,'.},=' ;•Sr}•��6�'1...t� ,ti`. i�•� t , .� i;y t�"::I•, ¢'l�. , '��: `:�.:t�'. �.?,' :�6 � ;.:� - y s.: i,it +',#.:.f.. �t;,i��!' '.�''1,�tI' 'a9''Pfs 't.?ti";•'A;��:„ ,'^' z r .',j:44 Sl ..'!='Fy:+�.✓E " `t�$ ��Y,'t-1'.! .. ?' F ,,N .7; PY Y1�E u':f.ijYl Sfl57, 1., ak'� '�°.h r.-F-" Dt.r, '1 ;1 rJ 1 'iH M". .,I:F t''; '7 -1. ✓'�1 t 1 ,�+ ,�Ic iv ,v_,k; •q7' a'. •�;� �y 'i� .8F ` ;'.i i 'A t4� ,iW. �;@'St :cl �:ru'� .:bi'.°�t�"/"i +.G x J.,4,"..',r�.a., 1:;; t;J':,*,'�'sZ�f...p�€.,i�.;�R�1t2' ] ,1't•�' l s!1A�">�a','. ;i.".d'r',1,2e'i:: ''f. ��,� .f ,�t �6,{:�A��t'�»F'�`a�.t � Yr���ti-'tom'`' il.�3 "'' }�`'�.".t�.' FI- 7., a �:friP�� i�..ffry:r �t'.J;��:;5,..i,h'n7 w;.;4•,.,.a.�:, :.,,�'�•'.;t.�i71 �'���,2 't 3�'�'�',•Ct.`C'v�-'�: �' ,1.. 4 t`-1�4"":• }'�:J✓ '. .�'" :F.,. ,el? �' �-, '��.'":[n C.µ,�,c ,:�,�, � r,-� `�i:ti ''_# )��: � ��'� �,{:. Y:�3i..-,Ifi �t•.,_i€.t;�;'�.it.� 4 =sd..,�- .?.'� ��'1::.r�p:.,_.�,�f�G�'•.Y =ri�4°-•: 1 r.yitrr .v,� vf... �. �{.,,...e.,cu, y�..'Sh: 'a T?.: I ;R:Y1ak'.i`-.•_�s�y_ `<�,. .u. 'f� g��:u,r�;. '!� :e<..7gr..,.t.• '.#�„r .��•`�5,+'�r_fit,�k:�:s�7�r- ��f. �_�{m } u y- "t•- ,��.'-,.ae.;� :F-u..:,:. §_ . rl.. �r!SC::b�Fr��.,:'i,',;'.v.trt:�SY!i��1.!S:;.ti:tar..�.-.JiaE,'v.'•.,�:..._.1..=}, ..t�:,i:, �•X^.C'...<,rl_ `;� a,_eRti -x•v7.t"_>w E�Y:IP-7r�l�Ii a..:P�..` ;.a'�:"S` '�: �'?`'�� .tA,c'�leP�t:.l r' ;.�r:?y_'Le,`r.' >- - - _ .t., _ >>,..ai�:..i<1.,aif'i:... ,.'fT.i'..r::> 3C,._•,...__.$s:, ;rt^5•>,t. .ts,^ ;��r.rrc ra,- _ .,:�,qa: .,•:trw• "+�,: •i 7. .i:° ..i,ce".w:�; :4p"i' ,ri 'c5;b;5; L°�^ ..�;no..�," ,t? `.:.... .r_ .t'i-. t:•a ,F,.•,.t.ba.{ - :Si'�:3..-,'-' ��': •f :,,td' ��•, :gw.' ^:j,.' �'' :'`t� rt^.:^:+y 3� „ � _n• u'�,. ..•�.i� ,�-� `t'?.}ter '7, rt i,, _•9A"} "'} t. T� �E'a. } ��++].. alit+ r.�»�'t ,7��j� r�et[.�jkEl �'�tg fi}� j�'1'd'. ( •;f4Xt?�:�'1, �s.f� ..`Cy�, ,i�,t„ .'r c�: c: ie:•.�,% ��-,, :i)�,,,' E "i 7��,- ,� .�.�.'��',f.,,r.,.r<F;..�i`i;.: !•.r.i!i.u..cs�l KnJf,�1,..�b�ai3S..!A �;��a,.�ill:�,v,t.,1�.t••R�.,ab�91..��ilh�!'�V.�r:l'S}a.,';};is'�r!" 5`tr Ia...kZt1'::v:,s�!�.F�-i 6�1,i'��"a„u,.� I`vi'�r�i9f�tdtftt�t.-7;rs�.•�3'i :drlF�za 1�:�_•+��"n�''lt-`�':�tTs'+rs,�•� eutr :@543, .S73a'Ki'•�aiS1:.7iF 0.l_12 "' �"—'-- --- - - Tuesday, Mar 4. 2003 Table ENO-1. - Construction Materials Gallatin County Area,Montana The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.00 to 0.99. The greater the value,the greater the likelihood that the bottom layer or thickest layer of the soil is a source of sand or gravel. Potential Source Potential Source Pct of Gravel of Sand Map Symbol of '( and Soil Name Map 11 Unit Rating Class and Rating Class and Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value I 508: 3lackdog 90 Poor Poor ! Bottom layer 0.00 Bottom layer 0.00 3 Thickest layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 'I 53B:` Amsterdam 85 Poor Poor Bottom layer 0.00 Bottom layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 5108: I Meadowcreek 85 Fair Fair Thickest layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 ' Bottom layer 0.38 Bottom layer 0.86 W: Yater 100 Not Rated Not Rated 1' 1 i 1 1 ' USDA Natural Resources �— Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table ENG-2. - Construction Materials 'I Gallatin County Area, Montana 'j -The information in this table indicaies'the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for cnsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.00 to 0.99. The smaller the value,the greater the limitation. Potential Source Potential Source Potential Source Pct: of Reclaimation Material of Roadfill of Topsoil Mao Symbol 1 and Soil Name !'Map�j I Rating Class and Ratino Class and ( Rating Class and Value `Unit Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value Limiting Features 1 50B: Blackdog 90 Fair Good Fair 'I Carbonate content 0.80 Carbonate content 0.80 Low content of 0.88 organic matter No water erosion 0.99 I limitation 53 B: Amsterdam 85 Fair Good Fair Carbonate content 0.68 Carbonate content 0.68 Low content of 0.88 i organic matter t Water erosion 0.90 1 510B: I 'Meadowcreek 85 Fair Fair Poor Low content of 0.13 Depth to saturated 0.98 Hard to reclaim 0.00 organic matter zone Depth to saturated 0.98 Droughty 0.86 zone ,' No water erosion 0.99 No rock fragments >0.99 i limitation W: Water 100 Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated i 1 USDA \atulal Resources �! Cot�serl`ation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table ENG-3. - Building Site Development Gallatin County Area,Montana i 1 The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition,bui does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in this report are limited to the top 5 limitations. Additional limitations may exist. 'i Dwellings without Dwellings with Small Commercial Pct Basements Basements Buildings Map Symbol of and Soil Name Map Unit Rating Class and I I Rating Class and I I Rating Class and f Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value 5OB: Blackdog 90 Not limited Not limited Not limited i 53B: Amsterdam 25 Not limited Not limited Not limited '! 510B: Meadowcreek 85 Not limited Somewhat limited Not limited Depth to saturated 0.99 zone W. Water 100 Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated I , 1 USDA. Natural Resources ' -- Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page i of i Table ENG-4. - Building Site Development Gallatin County Area,Montana The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition, but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in this report'are limited to the top 5 iinitations. Additional limitations may exist. 'i Local Roads Shallow Lawns and Map Symbol Pct and Streets Excavations Landscaping ` of and Soil Name Map l Rating Class and I Rating Class and. Rating Class and Unit Limiting Features I Value Limiting Features I Value I Limiting Features I Value 508: Slackdoo 90 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Not limited Frost action 0.50 Cutbanks cave 0.10 538: ' Amsterdam 85 Somewhat limited $omewhat limited Not limited Frost action 0.50 Cutbanks cave 0.10 5108: Mezdowcreek 85 Very limited Very limited Not limited Frost action 1.00 Cutbanks cave 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.99 ' zone W: Water 100 Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated 1 USDA natural Resources ' Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 I Table ENG-5. - Sanitary Facilities t Gallatin County Area,Montana i The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition,but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value i column range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in this report are limited to the top 5 limitations. Additional limitations may exist. i 4 I Septic Tank Sewage I1 Pct Absorption Fields Lagoons Map Symbol of and Soil Nane Mao Rating Class and I Rating Class and Ii Unit Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value 1 503: Elackdog 90 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Ii Restricted 0.50 Seepage 0.50 permeability Slope <0.01 . 53E: I{ Amsterdam 85 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Restricted 0.50 Seepage 0.50 permeability Slope <0.01 I3 5103: Meadowcreek 85 Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 1.00 Seepage 1.00 zone Depth to saturated 1.00 II Filtering capacity 1.00 zone Restricted 0.50 Slope <0.01 i perrrieability W: I Water 100 Not Rated Not Rated I I ' I USDA. Natural Resources ' mmadaffim�� Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 t ' i Table ENG-6. - Sanitary Facilities Gallatin County Area,Montana 1 t The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition,but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. Limiting leaiuras in-this report are limited to the top 5 limitations. Additional limitations may exist. i ' { T Daily Cover Trench Area Pct Sanitary Sanitary for Landfill Map Symbol of Landfill Landfill and Soil Name Map Rating Class and Rating Class and Rating Class and Unit 1 a Limiting Features Value I Limiting Features Value Limiting Features I Value 508: Blackdog 90 Not limited Not limited Not limited 1 53B: I Amsterdam 85 Not limited Not limited Not limited 1 5106: Meadowcreek 85 Very limited Very.limited Very limited j Depth to saturated 1.00 Depth to saturated 1.00 Too Sandy 1.00 I zone zone Seepage 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Gravel content 0.84 Too Sandy 1.00 II W: 1 Water 100 Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated I . { I 1 1� 1� 1� l 1! t . USDA Natural Resources ' aam — — Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1,122102 Page 1 of 1 Table Ff. - Engineering Index Properties Gallatin Counly Area, Montana Absence of an entry indicates that the clata were not estimated. Classificalion Fragments Percent Passing Sieve Number, Map Symbol Liquid Plasticity and Soil Name Depth USDA Texture >10 3-10 Limit Index Unified AASIiTO. Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 In Pct Pct Pct 5013: Blackdog 0-110 Silt Loam CL-IvIL A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 '10-19 Silly Clay Loam CL A-6 0 0 100 100 95-100 8y-95 30-40 '10-20 19-60 Silt Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 '100 100 95-'100 80-90 25-30 5-10 5313t Amsterdam 0-8 Sill Loarn CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 75-95 25-30 5-10 8-15 Sill'Loam CL A-4 0 0 '100 '100 95-'100 80-95 25-35 5-15 Very Fine Sandy Loam CL-lvIL A-6 Silly Clay Loam 15-42 Sill Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 •100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 Very Fine Sandy Loam 4.2-60 Silt Loam CL-MI_ A-4 0 0 100 '100 95-100 70-90 20-30 NI`-10 Very Fine Sandy Loam ML 5'1013: Meadowcreek 0-11 Loam CL-MI_ A-4 0 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 50-75 20-30 5-110 11-25 Loam C�-ML A-4 0 0 95-100 90-100 70 00 40-75 20-30 -5-10 Sandy Loam SC-SM Sill Loam 25-60 Very Gravelly Loamy Sand GP A-1 --- 0-10 25-4.5 15-35 10-25 0-10 --- NP Very Gravelly Sand GP-GM Extremely Gravelly Sand W: Wafer --- U_SDA N:, unfl. Resources =�~ Colisel-1-16011 suvilca Distribution Generation Dale: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table J1 a. - Physical Properties of the Soils Gallatin County Area, Montana Entries under"Erosion Factors--I"'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibilily Group"and"Wind Erodibilily Index"apply only to the surface layer. AbseAce of an entry indicates that data were not es.linaled. Erosion Factors Will Wind Moist Saturated Available Linear Map Symbol Organic Erodi- Erodi- and Soil Name Depth Sand Silt Clay Bulk Hydraulic Water Extensi- Mauer Kw I<f 7 bilily bilitY Density Conductivity Capacity bilily Group Index In Pct Pcl Pcl g/cc micro m/sec In/In PC( Pcl 500: Blackdog 0-10 -- --- 20-27 1.10-1.30 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-4.0 .32 .32 5 6 18 10-19 --- --- 27-35 1.20-1.40 1.40-4.00 0.16-0.20 3.0-5.9 1.0-3.0 .32 .32 19-60 --- --- 15-25 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37• 53B: Amsterdam 0-8 --- --- 20-27 1.10-1.30 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-4.0 .32 .32 5 6 48 8-15 --- --- 18-30 1.20-1.40 1.40-4.00 0.17-0.20 0.0-2.9 1.0-2.0 .43 .43 15-4.2 --- --- 18-27 '1.25-1.45 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 42-60 --- --- '10-20 1.25-1.50 4.00-14.00 0.17-0.19 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .43 .43 510B: Meadowcreel< 0-11 --- --- 18-25 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-5.0 .37 .37 3 5 56 11-25 --- --- 18-25 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.13-0.15 0.0-2.9 1.0-3.0 .37 .37 25-60 --- --- 0-5 •1.20-1.50 141.00 0.02-0.03 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .05 .20 W: Water --- --- --- - USD- A. N:r(xiral �Zesoul ces �� CU11servat1011 Service Distribution Generation Dale: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 t i � I Table J2. - Chemical Properties o`the Soils !it Gallatin County Area,Montana i i Absence or an entry indicates that data were not estimated. Effective Sodium Cation Calcium Map Symbol Depth Exchange Cation Soil Carbon Gypsym Salinity Adsorp- and Soil Name Capacity Exchange Reaction ate tion Capacity Ratio In meq/100 g meq/100 g pN Pct Pct mmhos/cm ' 50a: alackdog 0-10 15-20 6.6-7.3 0 0 0.0 0 10-19 15-25 --- 6.6-7.8 0 0 0.0 0 ' 19-6.0 10-15 --- 7.9-8.4 15-30 0 0.0 0 53E: Amsterdam G 8 15-20 --- 6.6-7.3 0 ii 8-15 15-20 — 6.6-7.8 0 --- --- --- 15-42 15-20 --- 7.9-8.4 15-35 0 0.0 0 42-60 10-15 --- 7.9-8.4 0 --- 0.0-2.0 -- it 510E: Meadowcreek 0-11 20-25 --- 6.6-8.4 0 --- 0.0-3.0 --- 11-25 15-20 `- 6.6-7.8 0 0.0-3.0' -_- 25-60 1.0-5.0 6.1 -7.8 0 0.0-3.0 W: iWater --- --- --- --- --- USDA -Natural Resources ' Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table K1. - Water Features Gallatin County Area, Montana Depths of layers are in feet. Estimaies of the frequency of ponding and flooding apply to the whole year rather than to individual months. Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern or that data were not estimated. Water Table Ponding Flooding Map Symbol Hydrologic Monthand Soil Name Group upper Lower Surface Duration Frequency Duration FUrequency Limit Limit Depth Ft Ft r-t 50B: f3lackdog t3 Jan-Dec -- --- None --- None 53B: Amsterdam Q Jan-Dec --- --- None --- None 510D: Meadowcreek C April 2.0-3.5 >6.0 --- --- None --- None May 2.0-3.5 >6.0 --- --- None --- None June 2.0-3.5 >6.0 --- --- None --- None W: Water --- Jan-Dec --- --- None --- None USDA Natural Resox1rces _��_ Coltsex-Vatiotl sex vice Distribution Generation Date: 1l22l02 Page 1 of 1 Table.K2. - Soil Features Gallatin County Area, Montana Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern or that data were not estimated. Map Symbol Restrictive Layer Subsidence Potential Risk of Corrosion and Soil Name Depth for Frost Kind t p. Thickness Hardness Initial Total Action Uncoated d to To Concrete In In In In %5013=• 0 --- Moderate High Low 53B:. Amsterdam --- --- --- --- --- --- Moderate High Low .. ..•.......:...... 0 High Moderate Low :Meadoavcr�elr�.� --- --- W: Water --- --- --- USDA, Natural Resources �! Collse]Cval:iioix Service Distribution Generation Dale: 1/22/02 Faye •t of •1 1 1 1 ' ;1 11� 1 �11 a I ! � s 1 1 APPENDIX C &R Engineering Responsibility Clause 1 1 11 . JI 1 l 11 i! 1 1 Job Number 02395 Baxter Square Sub.Phase I &3 For.-Ami Grant&Voss Bowman S :..',-.1..._.:.,v...r;-;.x r.:.•%-..:i,-pp'.^-=...,.,_..t,.s il.•_....:�..-_.�.�„'.a:'fi._?_.:...._-.y:-,Y,h-',•?_,¢.a2_.F,r.o-_:;a2u,4...n.:_'i..:....:�.,,.:^.^.:.s:..:.e�i.,-.,"._,x»_a ..._._„.,_.�.'-Mo.Jf.,, .- ';h`3��iL a�,br�\-�...�.. y.,J,:'•1`., =- J . _ � n - fiF.Y. ..4 i � : C ii- rS- .. yi�ik„: t5:t r y . S =. -. '.,anv evn�=erT:, ,.'`'*.t:.`= -e.I 1 r�m.c:•c�A•'.v.,.a.,Hre,ax=:,£:r.>s_'..e.3.�:..r,:^--.a—n;_'3-`...m.,>:.r...•.>,�..-...i..,..:. .,_,..:..>,,_._t,y s?am.r:..%..:z-;.\i'a.-.^,`....;_tt..:wr:°:�-.:-.„s.c.:':..•�__,�.>-a.+.r".+_..- P.._.-'�"1_`=.;4t'vc..�?..,;-..3..:u.:;'yaa-:t....r�;.vs.....��;,_G:'?.u..-#.1Y:.,:.Y�:e.•.c c....X;2•F::�.-<' y .i_,$.'pR;:._ , 2.5 - ue ' -_.n i..-::•..1i::a"e::'��.Y....r_.'t:G,£'?.;. ._:t n-...;.-.a. ,..».. .].i- _.:_._)_._.r.._.....;i.:-.-'.,:.:..t'.r....rM1 r .-.:e a...•"'C.r-.;.,.,.i..y-Y:K-, yyr.`._�'k�_ ..1:- .�(..:.'` .z.._ , ... l.._..ni."1....__.�.. SR..r. ......_. ... .......r.,..... ..........�, n..tiFnv.. -.I µ.�t�... - - - :�h�.^�•Li.: - - ,y _ Saves rcS,i:n:_•-w'E:�evtnv<_�>5 v.. - F*.'�- . ...s .-a__ i •a.,- ,1.j. .F�'x:r :'"?, .•,c:..<.T.;=;4.:'��= ^,.�=r5:: .'s,-. �.__'.y.:i:. . -.,-t �s•�:`�;,�>.- i3, KL"i.- `+ - -::s.F I,,s- >4:�^� .,r.. .•x-.:m.�>�. y�sfi'. �`•�..�'xc"2 ti 'rv.� _ �=F.� �:�,'��' .^,D ,._.:T. .s�' s. �. � '_3?. '_°,'S ^iT• -...a i• - .f.�.. '-u'� - �::,+;.- dvfi,.i.�-a��i�`:. ;:T .a .:,.x.:-...•:i.a�p,'��'�'c. .a`g' S' }} 1 ' :i J:F.. ,..t';: _._.:v1S ..�.....:.�, , .. v- .. .�.is`i ..4.xa_ 'i ?�. ..,'+...x1.:r5=: :ti ?::_,�:%.- :_ai;. .7•:.,} t tY, A It is known that the majority of construction related Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions j issues and problems arise due to subsurface site only at those points where samples are taken. The conditions. To better serve our clients we have data were extrapolated by your geotechnical engineer I outlined the bases of our recommendations so there who then applied judgment to render an opinion about is a clear understanding of the risks involved prior to overall subsurface conditions. The actual interface construction. between materials maybe far more gradual or abrupt than your report indicates. Actual conditions in areas ALL OF C&H ENGINERING AND SURVEYING INC, not sampled may differ from those predicted in your FOUNDATION REPORT'S ARE BASED ON report. While nothing can be done to prevent such FACTORS WHICH ARE SITE SPECIFIC - The situations, you and your geotechnical engineer can foundation report is based on a surface and subsurface worktogetherto help minimize their impact. Retaining investigation consisting of observations and test holes your geotechnical engineer to observe construction (TH's). From the investigation it is apparent thatthere can be particularly beneficial in this respect. are many factors which make each site unique. It is also apparent there is a limit to the services rendered. A REPORT'S RECOMMENDATIONS CAN ONLY BE Some limits are cost,location,size,and utilities to just PRELIMINARY-The construction recommendations name a few. Changing site condition may be costly included in your geotechnical engineer's report are therefore it if important to disclosing all available preliminary, because they must be based on the information to your consulting engineer prior to assumption that conditions revealed through selective finalizing any plans. exploratory sampling are indicative of actual conditions throughout a site. Because actual ' Unless your geotechnical engineer indicates otherwise, subsurface conditions can be discerned only during do not use your geotechnical engineering report: earthwork, you should retain your geotechnical engineer to observe actual conditions and to finalize - When the nature of the proposed structure is recommendations. Only the geotechnical engineer ' changed, for example, if an office building will be who prepared the report is fully familiar with the erected instead of a parking garage, or a refrigerated background information needed to determine whether warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrigerated or not the report's recommendations are valid and '' one, whether or not the contractor is abiding by applicable - When the size, elevation, or configuration of the recommendations. The geotechnical engineer who proposed structure is altered; developed your report cannot assume responsibility when the location or orientation of the proposed or liability for the adequacy of the report's structure is modified; recommendations if another party is retained to ' - When there is a change of ownership; observe construction. - or for application to an adjacent site. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED ' Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND PERSONS problems that may occur if they are not consulted Consulting geotechnical engineers prepare reports to after factors considered in their report's development meetthe specific needs of specific individuals.A report have changed. prepared for a civil engineer may not be adequate for ' a construction contractor or even another civil SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE A engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions geotechnical engineer prepared your report expressly that existed at the time of subsurface exploration. Do for you and expressly for purposes you indicated. No not base construction decisions on a geotechnical one other than you should apply this report for its engineering report whose adequacy may have been intended purpose without first conferring with the affected by time. Speak with your geotechnical geotechnical engineer. No party should apply this consultant to learn if additional tests are advisable report for any purpose other than that originally ' before construction starts. Note too, that additional contemplated without first conferring with the tests may be required when subsurface conditions are geotechnical engineer. affected by construction operations at or adjacent to ' the site, or by natural events such as floods, GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS earthquakes, or ground water fluctuations. Keep your ARE NOT AT ISSUE-Your geotechnical engineering geotechnical consultant apprized of any such events. report is not likely to relate any findings,conclusions, or recommendations ' MOST GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS ARE aboutthe potential forhazardous materials existing at PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENTS the site, The equipment, techniques, and personnel g;\02\c&h\02641\geotech.wpd Job Number 02393 Baxter Square Sub.Phase 1 &3 For: Ami Grant&Voss Bowman used to perform a geoenvironmental exploration differ ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE -Your consulting substantially from those applied in geotechnical geotechnical engineering firms are familiar with a engineering. Contamination can create major risks. if variety of techniques and approaches that can be j I you have no information about the potential for your used to help reduce risks for. all parties to a I j site being contaminated,you are advised to speak with 'construction project. from design through your geotechnical consultant for information relating to construction. Speak with your geotechnical engineer j geoenvironmental issues. not only about geotechnical issues,butothers as well. ') A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION - Costly problems can occur when other design professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a geotechnical engineering report. To help avoid misinterpretations,retain your geotechnical engineerto i work with other project design professionals who are affected by the geotechnical report. Have your + + geotechnical engineer explain report implications to design professionals affected by them,and then review those design professionals' plans and specifications to see how they have incorporated geotechnical factors. Although certain other design professionals may be familiar with geotechnical concerns, none knows as I much about them as a competent geotechnical I engineer. I TEST HOLE LOGS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE REPORT-Geotechnical engineers develop I; final test hole logs based upon their interpretation of the field logs (assembled by site personnel) and i laboratory evaluation of field samples. Geotechnical engineers customarily include only final test hole logs in their reports. Some clients believe that it is unwise or unnecessary to give contractors access to their 1 geotechnical engineering reports because they hold the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability providing the best available information to contractors helps prevent costly construction problems.It also helps reduce the adversarial attitudes ` that can aggravate problems to disproportionate scale. 'I READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY - Because geotechnical engineering is based extensive) 9 9 9 Y on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines.This situation has resulted in wholly I! unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical engineers.To help prevent this problem,geotechnical engineers have developed a number of clauses for.use in their contracts, reports, and other documents. Responsibility clauses are not exculpatory clauses designed to transfer geotechnical engineers'liabilities to other parties. Instead.they are definitive clauses that identify where geotechnical engineers'responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved + recognize their individual responsibilities and take ' appropriate action.Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your geotechnical engineering report. Read them closely.Your geotechnical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank answers to any questions. RELY ON THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR g;\02\c&h\02641\geotech.wpd + 1 � 1 ' �i �I �I 1! �i �i 1� r 1 1 1 1 Tracy, Page 1 of 1 Jami Morris 7 From: Tracy Blain [tblain@hrdc9.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:04 AM To: Jami Morris Subject: RE: Baxter Square Jami— My concern with the 20 year requirement is that neither the City nor the HRDC has the funding to ensure that the units will be affordable to the target population for the next 20 years. If our market continues in the way it has been moving, units sold to qualifying families may not be affordable to a qualifying family in 10 years. I agree that 20 years would be ideal and we would make our best effort, but the HRDC can't guarantee it. The question on number of units should probably be cleared with Voss and Ami—I was under the impression that they were only doing 8 units, but that may just be in the first building. Thanks, Tracy -----Original Message----- From: Jami Morris [ma ilto:JMorris@BOZEMAN.NET] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 12:50 PM To: Tracy Blain Cc: voss@kw.com Subject: Baxter Square Tracy, I spoke to the rest of Planning Staff last week in regards to the affordable housing proposal for Baxter Square. The consensus is that we will need the developer to provide a deed restriction on the two affordable housing lots that requires the condominiums to guarantee affordability for 20 years as specified in the UDO. The City will need to be party to the deed restriction to ensure compliance. Basically the deed restriction will state that in the event the owner of one of the units intends to sell then the unit must be sold to another qualifying household for a period of 20 years. This will require the City to verify that new owners qualify for the purchase of the condominium. The alternative is for the developer to make the units affordable but meet all of the standard parking requirements. PS: I need a little clarification in the proposal letter. Is it only 8 units proposed because the preliminary site plan indicates 2 buildings with 8 units each? Jami Morris,Associate Planner Bozeman Planning & Community Development 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 Imorris@bozeman.net 6/3/2005 • _ _! ; + 32 South Tracy-Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)587-44E6-fax(406)585-3538 (800)332-2796 , , , ,, ,,�, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , MAY 1 6 2005 March 17, 2005 ! + P.O.Box 1530- L=vingston,MT 59047 J (406)222-0896-fax(406)222-1232 Ms. Jami Morris, Associate Planner (800)289-0396 Bozeman Planning and Community Development 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 Dear Ms. Morris: I have been working with Ami Grant and Voss Bowman on the affordable housing requirements of their Baxter Square Development. I would.first like to note how cooperative both Ami and Voss have been with the HRDC; supplying us with vital information regarding the development and pro forma financials. Providing us with pro forma financials not only helped us to evaluate this project, but to better direct our conversations with other area developers working to fulfill affordable housing requirements. Upon review of the project, we have proposed the following to Baxter Square to fulfill their affordability requirements: • Baxter Square will put all units through the FHA approval process; • Baxter Square will contribute$5,000 per affordable unit to the down-payment assistance revolving loan fund to subsidize qualified purchasers; • Each affordable designated unit must be sold to a household earning less`han 100%of the Area Median Income, as certified by the HRDC; • The HRDC must be informed in writing when the unit is available for pre-sale, and the unit must be listed on the Multiple Listing Service; • In the event that a household earning less than 100%AMI is not found to purchase the home within 90 days of informing the HRDC of its availability, the unit may be sold to any qualified buyer, on condition that the HRDC =first be notified and given first right of refusal to purchase the property(the 90 day period begins when the builder notifies the HRDC in writing that the unit is available for pre-sale); + Households earning less than 100% of the A.-Ca Median income maybe eligible for down-payment assistance from the HRDC. I have shared this proposal with Baxter Square Partners, and they have indicated that this is acceptable to them. This proposal does not guarantee affordability for 20 years, a3 was outlined in their requirements. However; it does ensure that the purchasers of the home are members of the City's target affordability group for homeownership and will contribute $40,000 to increase long-term affordable homeownership opportunities. Considering the resources that the City's homeownership program currently has, th- HRDC cannot guarantee that we can keep an ownership unit affordable for 20 years. A 20 year affordability period would either require substantially increased funding from the City or a contribution from the developer that, in the case of Baxter Square, would likely render the project unfeasible. 'TS_- HRDC provides essential services such as:-Affordable Housing -Case 14tanag?mert -Community Develcpment QOC'`-• Emergency Services -Employment Assistance -Energy Assistance and Conservation -Gallatin Valley Food Bank Head Start :;<` Home Health Care Local Transportation Community First Fund Resource Property Management ti. Q �`r�H-•••• � • �Retired and Senior Volunteer Program. _ - A - After working with Baxter.Square Partners, Inc. on the proposed development, it is my opinion that they are making a good faith effort to meet their affordability requirements. The agreement that we have reached will provide additional resources to ensure that affordable homeownership opportunities exist for households wishing to,purchasein the city limits. Additionally, the information supplied by Baxter Square will help the HRDC to,better communicate with developers. Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding.this development. Sincerely, Trac B1ai Community Development Associate Cc: Ami Grant , Landowners for the collection of such sum, including the entry of any judgment. In addition, the City may, at its option, enforce payment of such amount by levying an assessment on the premises. B) Elect any other remedy available to City under the laws of the State of Montana. C) Any waiver by City of any default shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent default. D) It is agreed that it shall be no defense to the enforcement of this provision by the City that impact fees imposed pursuant to Chapter 3.24 of the Bozeman Municipal Code are subsequently voided or declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction. It is the express intention of the parties not to be bound by such a declaration or judgment and, therefore, notwithstanding any judgment either limiting impact fee payments under annexation agreements to specified amounts, or prohibiting any such payment, landowner will pay such amount as specified above. 10.r Affordable�Housing Having recognized the City's concern for affordable housing,the Landowner understands and agrees that prior to such submittal of a preliminary plat application for all or any portion of the subject property,the future developer shall develop an"Affordable Housing Implementation Plan",subject to consideration, review and approval by the City of Bozeman. Should the "Affordable Housing Implementation Plan" be deemed applicable, said Plan shall guarantee that a certain percent of the total number of housing units to be developed shall be managed and maintained as affordable in accordance with guidelines established by the City of Bozeman. D.A.K. ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 8 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,including excavation and footing preparation,but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured bya method of securityequal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of securityshall be valid for a period of not less than twelve(12)months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan,building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3"Preparation of a Landscape Plan",landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience,or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0"Parking Lot Landscaping,"which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibilityon adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. Awatercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops,an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.1101.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required$100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signe "Van Accessible". oo� %�S 16. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.i "Affordable Housing" when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing,as defined in Ch t r 18.04,if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 0 ars and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure comp ice and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided,and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 2 Page 1 of 1 Jami Morris From: Tracy Blain [tblain@hrdc9.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:31 PM To: Jami Morris Subject: RE: West Winds Subdivision Thanks, Jami. I will forward this on to Caren. I have also attached our letter on Baxter Square. You will notice that in the letter I say that we will not be able to guarantee 20 years on the units. We plan to do our best to keep the units affordable for as long as we can,but we can't promise—if the market continues like this that just takes more money than any of us have (for homeownership units—rentals are a different story). It will be your decision as to whether or not our plan meets their requirements— we (HRDC)just found that this was what we could make work while ensuring that the project was still feasible. I have explained to Ami that having plan with HRDC does not obligate the city to approve it. Please let me know if you have any questions on any of this. Thanks for all of your work. Not that I didn't appreciate all of the work of your office before, but attending a Planning Board meeting really heightened my awareness and appreciation for all you do. Tracy -----Original Message----- From: Jami Morris [ma ilto:JMorris@BOZEMAN.NET] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:22 AM To: Tracy Blain Subject: West Winds Subdivision In addition to meeting the PUD criteria for construction of affordable dwelling units the subdivision must also meet the following conditions of approval: #27 The Section 42 Affordable Housing and the Assisted Living, as depicted in the plan,shall remain in the PUD plan. #31 The City of Bozeman will accept the 11% calculation for parkland dedication for the affordable Section 42 housing lots so long as it includes some very low income housing. Thanks for working on this. Let me know if you have any other questions. I'm swamped right now but perhaps we can sit down and discuss this matter further next week. Jami Morris,Associate Planner Bozeman Planning & Community Development 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 imorris@bozeman.net 5/10/2005 May 10, 2005 Ms. Jami Morris, Associate Planner Bozeman Planning and Community Development 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 Dear Ms. Morris: I have been working with Ami Grant and Voss Bowman on the affordable housing requirements of their Baxter Square Development. I would first like to note how cooperative both Ami and Voss have been with the HRDC, supplying us with vital information regarding the development and pro forma financials. Providing us with pro forma financials not only helped us to evaluate this project,but to better direct our conversations with other area developers working to fulfill affordable housing requirements. Upon review of the project, we have proposed the following to Baxter Square to fulfill their affordability requirements: • Baxter Square will put all units through the FHA approval process; • Baxter Square will contribute$5,000 per affordable unit to the down-payment assistance revolving loan fund to subsidize qualified purchasers; • Each affordable designated unit must be sold to a household earning less than 100% of the Area Median Income, as certified by the HRDC; • The HRDC must be informed in writing when the unit is available for pre-sale, and the unit must be listed on the Multiple Listing Service; • In the event that a household earning less than 100%AMI is not found to purchase the home within 90 days of informing the HRDC of its availability, the unit may be sold to any qualified buyer, on condition that the HRDC first be notified and given first right of refusal to purchase the property(the 90 day period begins when the builder notifies the HRDC in writing that the unit is available for pre-sale); • Households earning less than 100% of the Area Median income maybe eligible for down-payment assistance from the HRDC. I have shared this proposal with Baxter Square Partners, and they have indicated that this is acceptable to them. This proposal does not guarantee affordability for 20 years, as was outlined in their requirements. However; it does ensure that the purchasers of the home are members of the City's target affordability group for homeownership and will contribute $40,000 to increase long-term affordable homeownership opportunities. Considering the resources that the City's homeownership program currently has, the HRDC cannot guarantee that we can keep an ownership unit affordable for 20 years. A 20 year affordability period would either require substantially increased funding from the City or a contribution from the developer that, in the case of Baxter Square, would likely render the project unfeasible. After working with Baxter Square Partners, Inc. on the proposed development, it is my opinion that they are making a good faith effort to meet their affordability requirements. The agreement that we have reached will provide additional resources to ensure that affordable homeownership opportunities exist for households wishing to purchase in the city limits. Additionally, the information supplied by Baxter Square will help the HRDC to better communicate with developers. Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this development. Sincerely, Tracy Blain Community Development Associate Cc: Arm Grant i CITJ bF BOZEMAN DEPA TMENT OF PLANNING AND CO MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 ;;•' 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net. April 5, 2005 Baxter Square Partners 317 Sanders Avenue Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Baxter Square PUD Final Plan#Z-031JZunified development of 101-townhouses and related site improvements on property located on the north side of Baxter Lane between Thomas Drive and Davis Lane. On April 5, 2005, the Final Plan for the Planned Unit Development for the unified development of 101- townhouses and related site improvements on property located on the north side of Baxter Lane between Thomas Drive and Davis Lane was approved and signed by the Director of Planning & Community Development based on the fulfillment of conditions and code provisions. Adherence to the conditions of approval and the outlined code provisions is mandatory. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 582-2260. Thank you for your participation in the development review process, and good luck with your project! Respectfully, Jami Morns Associate Planner JM/jm cc: Buffalo Land Management,L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road,Manhattan, MT 59741 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss-Drive,Bozeman, MT 59718 JJKG&Associates, 303 W. Mendenhall Street,Bozeman,MT 59715 planning • zoning •.subdivision review . annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination R, ASSOCIATES, INC. , r v (Transmittal Mq R 2 g ^?5 To: City of Bozeman: Jamie Morris Phone: 406.582:2260 J From: John Sinrud Date: 3/29/2005 Re: Baxter Square Subdivision CC: ❑ Mail ❑ E-mail ❑ CD ❑ Letter X Plans ❑ Other Jamie, below is the landscaper that reviewed and signed off on the Baxter Square Subdivision Park Master Plan. Gallatin Valley Landscape Inc. P.O. Box 6483 Bozeman, MT 59771 Phone:406.580.0570 Fax: 406.585.7445 gallatinlandscape(cD-hotmail.com Jeremy Henriken http://.qallatinvalleyiandscape.com/ Modification to Master Park Plan drop zone around play equipment will consist of landscape wood chips. If you have any questions please call. Thank you, John Sinrud CONFIDENTIAL 303 W. Mendenhall Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 406.556.1311 Fax: 406.556.1307 Email info@jjkginc.com ±: CIAF BOZEMAN • ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE 1 OF 1 DATE: March 22,2005 TO: Voss Bowman FAX NUMBER: 582-0095 FROM:Tami Morris,Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD Plan MESSAGE: I have completed my review of your proposed final plan and the following items have not been adequately addressed on the plans. Please provide the following corrections: 1. I need a complete Master Park Plan. I have supplied a copy of a sample plan for your reference. 2. The landscape plan for the watercourse depicts Juniper plantings. These are not appropriate shrubs for a watercourse setback. Please check with your landscape designer in order to identify more suitable species. All 7 copies of the modified landscape plan need to be signed by a landscape professional. 3. Work on the street tree planting plan. Make sure only large canopy trees are depicted and spread out the Ash trees throughout due to possible threat of Emerald Ash Borer. 4. I need a copy of the signed, notarized and recorded Conditions for a Conditional Use Permit. Either submit a copy of the recorded document with the recording barcode or a copy of a recording receipt as proof that the form was recorded with the Clerk&Recorders Office. 5. Cash in lieu of water rights is due prior to issuance of Final PUD approval. Please check with the Director of Public Service for the amount due. planning 9 zoning • subdivision review • annexation 9 historic preservation • housing 9 grant administration 9 neighborhood coordination LOY OF BOZEMAN • a' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPM Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 " lannin P.O. Box 1230 p g@boieman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE 1 OFJO DATE: February 3, 2005 TO: John Sinrud Seat #29 FAX NUMBER: 444-4825 FROM: Jami Morris, Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Master Park Plan MESSAGE: I have attached a copy of the Harvest Creek Park Plan. This is a good example of what the plan should look like. planning zoning subdivision review annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 02/03/2005 16:26 NAME CITY OF BOZEMAN FAX 4065822263 TEL 4065822280 SER. # BROD3J368594 DATE DIME 02/03 16:09 FAX NO./NAME 9140644448253013 DURATION 00:17:40 PAGE(S) 47 RESULT NG MODE STANDARD ECM NG: POOR LINE CONDITION Message Page 1 of 2 ;i . . • is Jami Morris From: Tim Cooper Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:12 PM To: Jami Morris Subject: RE: General Liability for Real Estate Developers. I appreciate Tyler's willingness to be thorough on the insurance matters, and cautious on contractual matters. The one we need to hear from is the subdivider/developer: is ABV Development willing to record a restriction on transfer and occupancy until the fire system is approved? If so, let's draft such a restriction and get the City named as an additional insured on the fire hazard insurance. We aren't done, however. The ordinance also requires a liability policy. We have to have received them in the past because this isn't the first time we've done concurrent construction. If this guy can't get it, he can't meet the requirements of the code, and he therefore cannot obtain the exception and cannot get the building permit before acceptance of the infrastructure. -----Original Message----- . From: Jami Morris Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:24 PM To: Tim Cooper Subject: RE: General Liability for Real Estate Developers. So Tyler suggests, "A separate agreement prohibiting the transfer of ownership of the structure before the termination of the builders risk policy and prior to the completion of the project or until the fire system has been approved may be appropriate." Is this a viable option that responds to your concern? Jami Morris,Associate Planner Bozeman Planning & Community Development 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 imorris@bozeman.net -----Original Message----- From: Tim Cooper Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:18 PM To: Jami Morris Subject: FW: General Liability for Real Estate Developers. This is the latest. I haven't responded yet -----Original Message----- From: Tyler Delaney [mailto:tdelaney@lstwestinsurance.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 11:39 AM To: Tim Cooper Cc: Susan Howard Subject: General Liability for Real Estate Developers. Dear Tim, Per our conversation, ABV Development Corporation is trying to pull a building permit before final plat has been granted for Baxter Square sub-division. They have come to me for a general liability 3/7/2005 Message Page 2 of 2 policy to satisfy the requirements of the City in order to proceed. Carriers for a policy of that type are not available it appears. I found out through conversations with City Planners and yourself, that the reason for the policy requirement is to hold the City harmless in the event of a fire at a construction site within the sub- division. A fire that the City could not properly fight due to the fire suppression/hydrant systems not being completed. If that is the only exposure the City is concerned about, adding the City of Bozeman on to the builders risk policy as an additional interest may be a suitable alternative to the general liability requirement. A builders risk policy covers a project for labor and materials during the course of construction. Additional interests added to the policy are not subject to subrogation by the builder risk carrier. A separate agreement prohibiting the transfer of ownership of the structure before the termination of the builders risk policy and prior to the completion of the project or until the fire system has been approved may be appropriate. We can offer advice on the insurance side of this issue, and cannot advise on any contractual language. We assume any contractual language would be reviewed by a legal expert. Theoretically it would be difficult for the builders risk carrier to litigate against the City in the event they pay a claim on a structure fire. The policy premium is based, in addition to the completed cost of the structure, on the protection class of the lot and therefore would know if a hydrant system is in place or not at the time they write the policy. Requiring the Contractor to add the City of Bozeman as an additional insured could be considered as an additional option. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely Tyler Delaney Tyler Delaney, CIC tdelanev@1 stwestinsurance.com 406-587-5111 800-606-9378 Fax 406-586-0271 3/7/2005 Page 1 of 1 Jami Morris From: Ryon Stover Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 10:36 AM To: Jami Morris Subject: Baxter Square I have a couple of concerns about the Baxter Square project. With the threat of the Emerald Ash Borer on the horizon the Ash trees should be spread out through the landscape, rather than being planted in groupings. This little bugger is wreaking havoc in a couple of mid-western states, may never get here, but it might. Jon Thompson, the city forester in Great Falls, where they have had a big problem with Dutch Elm Disease is denying any plans with ash trees. I'm not quite ready for such drastic measures yet. And, the plans show a lot of planting in or near sight triangles. And, the first species listed in the legend is American Ash, Fraxinus americana, which is correct. But 'Patmore' is a Green Ash, Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Pretty picky, eh? There is not much difference, and either is ok to plant here, but the ` designer/architect should know the difference. Any questions? Give me a ring. Ryon Stover City Forester City of Bozeman Box1230 Bozeman,Mt. 59771 406-582-3200 2/8/2005 .:: CITI�F BOZEMAN Ci%, �;w rLcir: n alcps 042005, w DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Boz 1230 fax 406-582-2263 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozemon.net www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: .Bob Murray,Project Engineer Neil Poulsen,Chief Building Official John Alston,Water/Sewer Greg Megaard,Fire Marshal John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent John Harper,Recreation&Parks Advisory Board Ryon Stover,City Forester FROM: Jami Morris,Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD#Z-03184 PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February 2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. E E B - 8 2005 o- planning zoning • subdivision review . annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination CI.OF BOZEMAN 0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM j , TO: Bob Murray,Project Engineer Neil Pou& Chief Building Official �1ara5u.,+gi�vr..ti.+...,.,�nw.tiY.Y.awn�eio John Alston,Water/Sewer Greg Megaard,Fire Marshal John Vandelinder,Streets Superintendent FROM: Jami Morris,Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD #Z-03184 PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February 2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project and the list of conditions of approval with the applicant's narrative. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed bythe Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land,shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing grant administration • neighborhood coordination 7. A Building Permit must Atamied prior to the work, and must bAktained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g"Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.1 10.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.1 "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable Page 2 r�r117 V CITOF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 � Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM *0: '1 Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official L (.0 x t' V ra `v i John Alston,-Water/Sewer Greg Megaard,Ti6re Marshal John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent Jami Morris,Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD #Z-03184 F E B PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February 2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project and the list of conditions of approval with the applicant's narrative. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land,shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 7. A Building Permit must ]obtained prior to the work, and must ]obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Budding Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.1103.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.1 "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable Page 2 CITj*F BOZEMAN • • i DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT h.4 Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Murray,Project Engineer Neil Poulsen Chief Building Official Kok , N R P zp1— `? � - 6 John Alston,Water/Sewer Greg Megaard,Fire Marshal John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent FROM: Jami Morris,Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD #Z-03184 FEB ' 4 Z005 PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February 2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project and the list of conditions of approval with the applicant's narrative. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land,shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 1 7. A Building Permit must Jobtamied prior to the work, and must I&btained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9)'months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan, buildirg permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined'in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan",landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.1103.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Pernut Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.1 "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable Page 2 CIAF BOZEMAN y DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a.' Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Murray,Project Engineer Neil Poulsen,Chief Building Official John Alston,Water/Sewer Greg Megaard,Fire Marshal John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent John rearpH ,Recreati6n&Parks Advisory Board— Ryon Stover,City Forester FROM: Jami Morris,Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD#Z-03184 PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February 2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. planning zoning subdivision review annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination RECEIVED FEB 0 3 20051 . CIT*F BOZEMAN Cit"cf Eoz n C�cPs DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CO MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net r MEMORANDUM r— �_ — 7" 07 Bob Murray,Project Engineer Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official �`--- John Alston,Water/Sewer Greg Megaard,Fire Marshal fY,( v=J61jri Varidelirider,Streets-Superintendent "/�J &,u pt� J b051VW Jami Morris;Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD #Z-03184 PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project and the list of conditions of approval with the applicant's narrative. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. Conditions for Approval: L A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land,shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 49, 7. A Building Permit must Obtained prior to the work, and must Obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated'cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.1 10.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.1 "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable Page 2 • CIT*F BOZEMAN • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 ' Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozemon.net MEMORANDUM �1v QF INS Bob Murray,Project Engineer FEB Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official elan F-n Dept. John Alston,Water/Sewer r Greg Megaard,Fire Marshal L ro John Vandelinder,Streets Superintendent I is Jami Morris,Associate Planner FEB — 7 2005 RE: Baxter Square Final PUD #Z-03184 ' PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project and the list of conditions of approval with the applicant's narrative. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land,shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 7. A Building Permit must Obtamied prior to the work, and must Obtained within one year of t. • Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan",landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.1103.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable Page 2 CI*F BOZEMAN • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Murray,Project Engineer Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official John Alston,Water/Sewer Greg Megaard,Fire Marshal John Vandelinder,Streets Superintendent FROM: Jami Morris,Associate Planner RE: Baxter Square Final PUD #Z-03184 PROPOSED FINAL PUD PLAN DATE: February2,2005 Attached you will find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project and the list of conditions of approval with the applicant's narrative. Please review and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. Please keep in mind that this subdivision was approved for concurrent construction through the Planned Unit Development review process. Conditions for Approval: A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. K&( t y&A C,,,,O to" A-4- Ue�( k4, rn clal oe pc te 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land,shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 7. A Building Permit * be obtained prior to the work, and lot be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g"Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.1 10.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.1 "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable Page 2 housing for a minimikeriod of 30 years and the use as afforte housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d "Open Space Maintenance Plan," requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city, the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines, including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers, with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2 "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements". The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 20. Adequate snow storage area must be designated on the final site plan identifying areas to store snow off of the streets and sidewalks and outside the street vision triangles. 21. The property owner shall provide screening along the east property line adjacent to the 8-plexes that complies with the zoning ordinance and is acceptable to the property owner, adjacent property owners and the City of Bozeman. Page 3 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 0 These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Does the proposal one or more of the following: Yes No 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures 9 ❑ 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or industrial ❑ space More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail commercial uses,permitted ❑ service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑ B. General Information. General Information Yes No N/A Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ❑ ❑ A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel ❑ ❑ to and from the site. The route shall avoid,inhere possible,local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety n 1r101tT4lve_ Boundary line of property with dimensions ❑ ❑ Date of plan preparation and changes ❑ ❑ .North point indicator ❑ ❑ Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑ ❑ Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet ❑ ❑ Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio, FAR),with a ❑ ❑ breakdown by land use Location,percentage of parcel(s) and total site,and square footage for the following: Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ Total number, type and density per type of dwelling units, and total net and gross residential density ❑ ❑ and density per residential parcel Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, Er ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each The information required by '18.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless such ❑ ❑ information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the Cft during subdivision review of the land to be developed, or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application Description and mapping of soils existing on the site,accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of ❑ ❑ such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03) <' Building design information on-site): Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s) or structure(s) ❑ ❑ Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot outfall ❑ ❑ when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or ❑ ❑ construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with '18.78 050.H,BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC (Supplementary ❑ ❑ Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: Site Plan Information Yes No N/A Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determined by the Planning Director ❑ ❑ Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet, except for sites adjacent to major ❑ ❑ arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet On-site streets and rights-of-way ❑ ❑ Ingress and egress points ❑ ❑ Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ Traffic flow off-site ❑ ❑ Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: Electric IT ❑ ❑ Natural gas ❑ ❑ Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑ ❑ Water ❑ ❑ Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ Surface water,including: Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑ ❑ Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ❑ ❑ Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58,BMC (Bozeman Floodplain ❑ ❑ Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality ❑ ❑ improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion'ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) ❑ ❑ The downstream conditions (developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ Any downstream restrictions E7, ❑ ❑ Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic ❑ ❑ features Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details and ❑ ❑ interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict Page 4 } 'Ni Provision for handicappe accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelc air ramps, parking ❑ ❑ spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ Exterior signs. Note — The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for 1Z ❑ ❑ compliance with Chapter 18.52, BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ A site plan, complete with all structures, parking spaces, building entrances, traffic areas (both z, ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian),vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in '18.78.060.R,BMC (Lighting Plan),if not previously provided Curb, asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ Landscaping - detailed plan showing plantings, equipment, and other appropriate information as ❑ El- required in '18.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required, complete section C below. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and ❑ ❑ shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species Snow storage areas le ❑ ❑ Location of City limit boundaries, and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ 0 Jurisdiction,within or near the development Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ ❑ Historic, cultural and archeological resources,describe and map any designated historic structures or ❑ ❑ districts,and archeological or cultural sites Major public facilities,including schools,parks, trails,etc. ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required, the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the property ❑ ❑ owner and the person preparing the plan Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot Eir , ❑ ❑ Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses,required watercourse setbacks,and the location of ❑ ❑ any 100-year floodplain; the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines, driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ I ❑ Location, height and material of proposed screening and fencing (with berms to be delineated by ❑ ( ❑ one foot contours) Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer strips. ❑ ❑ Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, including Rr ❑ ❑ typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation, heights, spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and ❑ ❑ loading areas, including information as to the amount (in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from damage ❑ ❑ during construction Size, height, location and material of proposed seating, lighting, planters, sculptures, and water V ❑ ❑ features A description of proposed watering methods OF ❑ ❑ Page 5 "1 Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) low EJ Tabulation of points earned by the plan—see '18.48.060,BMC(Landscape Performance Standards) El Q Designated snow removal storage areas El El Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters 7 '❑ Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage 0 El control Existing and proposed grade Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity Areas to be irrigated Planting• plan for watercourse buffers, per '18.42.100, BMC (Watercourse Setbacks), if not previously provided through subdivision review Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not otherwise 11 ❑ provided by the application.Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls i I i I i Page 6 j I) i 4PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHIE:LIST The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as pan of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explauied in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals mill be returned to the applicant. A. ❑ Planned Unit Development— Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information I Yes I No N/A Data regarding site conditions, land characteristics, available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information about adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land Conceptual (sketch) drawing showing the proposed location of the uses of land, major ❑ ❑ I ❑ streets and other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site A computation table showing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and as a ❑ ❑ ❑ percent of total site area B. ❑ Planned Unit Development— Prelirninan,Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yes No N/A The following information shall be presented in an 8'/2- by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and He flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: Application forms ❑ ❑ I ❑ A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of ❑ ❑ ❑ the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the ❑ ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth Policy Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas ❑ I ❑ ❑. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or ❑ I ❑ ❑ ponions of the planned unit development Estimate of number of employees for business,commercial and industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑ Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the ❑ ❑ ❑ applicant Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the applicant ❑ ❑ ❑ shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of '18.36.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria), BMC. The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character are ❑ ❑ ❑ being avoided or mitigated Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.", ❑ ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recyr-ng) A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public i nprovements and recreational and common space areas One reduced version of all prelimiiary plan and supplemental plan maps and ❑ ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 8'/2- by 11-inches or 11- by 17-inches size Page 3 ; (PUD Checklist-Prepared 12/2/03) J T In addition to uhe information listed on the Site Plan Checklist; e follo�vulg A . information shall be included on the site plan: . Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be uicluded where ❑ I '❑ ❑ appropriate The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, ❑ ❑ I ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screenuzg, fences, walls and other landscaping Attorneys or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ( ❑ Viewsheds: I Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site, describe and map ❑ ❑ I ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent off-siteF El El ❑ locations Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: The proposed width I ❑ ❑ ❑ Treatment of curbs and gutters,or other storm water control system if other than ❑ ❑ ❑ curb and gutter is proposed Sidewallt systems ❑ I ❑ I ❑ Bikeway systems, where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the ❑ ❑ ❑ City are proposed Physiographic data,including the following: A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table ❑ ❑ ❑ fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with ' 18.78.120.B.3.c,BMC Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 feet of I ❑ ❑ ❑ the site If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the ❑ ❑ ❑ requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted Not withstanding the.waiver provisions of ' 18.78.080.B.9, BMC, at the discretion of the ❑ ❑ ❑ Cry Engineer, a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development. The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses. The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in 1 18.78.050.L, BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as pan of a concurrent subdivision review,that analysis shall meet this requirement If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ ❑ under question,the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans .as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed planned unit development A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's ❑ ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of ' 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application C. Planned Unit Development- Final Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Final Plan Information Yes Into N/A A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the ❑ ❑ corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development A final plan site plan shall be submitted on a 24- by 36-inch sheet(s) at the same scale as the approved preliminary plan.If a different scale is requested or required,a copy of the approved preliminary plan shall be submitted that has been enlarged or reduced to equal the scale of the final plan. However, only the scales permitted for the preliminary plans shall be pemnitted for final plans. The final plan site plan shall show the follownrg information: Page 4 • Land use Bata (same infornnation as required on the prelimn u ysite plan) ❑ Lii � I � Lot lines,easements,public rights-of-way as per subdivision plat I I ❑ ❑ Attomey's or owner's certification of ownersh' ❑ I ❑ Planning Director certification of approval of the site clan and its conformance [i D with the preliminary plan Owner s certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth,on I ❑ Lf the site plan A final landscape plan consistent with the conditions and restrictions of the approved ❑ ❑ preliminary plan shall be submitted. It shall also be consistent %ith the Chapter.18.48 (Landscaping), BMC, except that an);stated conditions and restrictions of the preliminary plan approval shall supersede the provisions of Cnapter 18.48 (Landscaping),BMC An official final subdivision plat of the site must accompany the final planned unit '❑ ❑ development plan when applicable. City approval of the final subdivision plat shall be required before issuance of building permits Prior to submission of the final plan to the DRC and ADR staff, engineering plans and ❑ El specifications for sewer, water, street improvements and other public improvements, and an executed improvements agreement in proper form providing for the installation of such improvements,must be submitted to and approved by the City A plan for the maintenance of open space, meeting the requirements of ' 18.72.040 ❑ I ❑ (Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee), BMC, shall be submitted with an application for final plan approval. Open space shown on.the approved final plan shall not be used for the construction of any structures not shown on the final plan t Page 5 r r f Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 205 Edelweiss Drive • Bozeman, Montana 59718 • Phone(406) 587-1115 Fax(406) 587-9768 www.chengineers.com • E-Mail: info@chengineers.com January 25, 2005 - City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Attn: Jami Morris JAN 2 6 2005 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: Baxter Square PUD Subdivision-Final PUD Plan(02395) Dear Jami, The following narrative is provided as supplemental information to the attached Site Plan Checklist and Planned Unit Development Final Plan Checklist Site Plan Checklist 1. General Information: a. A supplemental vicinity map is enclosed showing properties Avithin one-half mile of the site. b. Property Owners: Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C. 317 Sanders Avenue Bozeman,MT 59718 CAVU, L.L.C. 13707 Camp Creek Road Manhattan,MT 59741 c. Construction traffic will travel to and from the site on Baxter Lane. Baxter Lane is classified as a minor arterial roadway. The intersection with North 19'h Avenue,a principal arterial,is located approximately %Z mile to the east. d. The enclosed final plan shows all boundaries with dimensions. e. The enclosed final plan shows the date prepared along with revision dates. f. The enclosed final plan has a north point indicator. g. The enclosed final plan is drawn at a scale of 1"=60'. Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying • h. The enclosed final plan shows parcel sizes in gross acres and square feet. i. Enclosed is a spread sheet with a breakdown of total floor area and floor area ratio for the individual units and the building clusters. j. Square footage and percentages of buildings and driveways are included on the enclosed spread sheet. An area tabulation is shown on the final plan showing parkland,open space and public right- of-way areas. k. This subdivision will have a total of 99 townhouse units, I single family home and 2-8plex units. The overall density of the subdivision will be 6.4 dwelling units per acre. 1. A detailed parking plan is enclosed showing circulation aisles, access drives, compact spaces, handicapped spaces and on-street parking. m. The information required by 18.78.060.L, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys) was previously provided through a subdivision review process. n. A soils report prepared for construction of the residential structures is enclosed. o. Building heights, elevations and floor plans are enclosed. The buildings will not be located in a floodway or floodplain area. p. There are no temporary facilities proposed for the project. q. A noxious weed control plan complying with 18.78.050.H,BMC was previously provided through subdivision review. r. A draft of the Covenants and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowner's Association is enclosed. 2. Site Plan Information: a: Topographic contours at F intervals are shown on the enclosed site plan. b. Adjacent streets and street right-of-ways are shown on the enclosed site plan. c. On-site streets and rights-of-way are shown on the enclosed site plan. d. Ingress and egress points are shown on the enclosed site plan. e. Traffic flow on-site is shown on the enclosed site plan. f. Traffic flow off-site is shown on the enclosed site plan. g. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements are shown on the enclosed site plan. h. Existing and proposed surface water and wetlands are shown on the enclosed site plan. There are no floodplains identified on the Federal Insurance Rate Map within the property. A floodplain analysis report is not required for the subdivision. i. A grading and drainage plan has been submitted to and approved by the City Engineering Department. j. Cattail Creek, the only drainageway on the property, is shown and labeled on the enclosed site plan. k. There are no significant rock outcroppings or slopes greater than 15 percent on site. The only significant land feature is,the abandoned railroad berm shown on the site plan. 1. Sidewalks, trails, driveways and roads are shown on the enclosed site plan. m. Provisions for handicapped accessibility are shown on the enclosed site plan. n. The only fence proposed will be along the eastern perimeter of the subdivision at the north end. The fence will be a privacy fence. o. Any temporary signs used for marketing will require a sign permit from the Department of Planning and Community Development. p. Garbage cans will be hauled out to the street on the appropriate day by the individual homeowners. q. A site plan,parking plan, landscaping plan and lighting plan are enclosed. r. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details are shown on the construction plans that have been approved by the City Engineering Department. s. A landscaping plan is enclosed. t. Any unique natural features are identified on the site plan. The only unique natural features on site include Cattail Creek, the abandoned railroad berm and wetlands. u. Snow storage areas are shown on the enclosed site plan. v. City limits and zoning boundaries are shown on the enclosed PUD Final Plan. w. A cultural resource inventory has been prepared for the subdivision and is enclosed. There are no known archeological or cultural sites of significance on the property. x. Parks and trails are shown on the enclosed site plan. There are no other maj or public facilities on the property. 3. Landscape Plans All items listed are shown on the enclosed landscape plan. 4. Planned Unit Development-Final Plan a. Owners: Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C. Ami Grant Voss Bowman CAVU, L.L.C. Evert Wierda Ed Wierda Steve Nichols b. A final site plan is enclosed showing all items listed. c. A final landscape plan is enclosed showing all items listed. d. A draft of the final subdivision plat is enclosed. The plat will need to be filed prior to occupancy of any structures. e. Engineering plans and specifications for sewer, water, street improvements and other public improvements have been approved for Phases 1 and 2 of the subdivision. An improvements agreement will be submitted if the owners decide to submit for concurrent construction or file the plat prior to completion of all required improvements. f. A plan for the maintenance of the open spaces is included as a part of the Homeowners Association documents. Please review the enclosed applications and submittals and let know if you need anything additional to complete your review. Sincerely, Ma*ewC terman, P.E. Enc. G:\c&h\02\02395\Office\pudfinalplansub.wpd Renewable Technologies, Incorporated 511 Metals Bank Building Butte,Montana 59701 (406)782-0494 Fax:(406)782-3064 January 21, 2004 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 2415 West Main Street, Suite 1 Bozeman, Montana 59718 Reference: Cultural resource inventory of the Baxter Square Subdivision, G4atin Cottiity, Montana f To Whom It May Concern: This letter constitutes the Renewable Technologies, Inc. (RTI) report describing the above- referenced project. Plans have been prepared to develop a residential subdivision on an approximate 18-acre site just to the northwest of the City of Bozeman. The subject property is bounded by Baxter Lane to the south and is west of Thomas Drive. It is located in the southwest quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 5 East. A site map of the location is attached (Figure 1, page 4). As part of the PUD application process associated with this proposed development, a "professional cultural resource inventory of the site" was required to be completed. C&H Engineering and Surveying contracted with RTI to conduct such an inventory, and the site was investigated by RTI staff professional Mark Hufstetler on October 11 and 12, 2003, with a follow-up visit on January 20, 2004. Methodology and results The project area is on nearly-level rural land in the east-central portion of the Gallatin Valley, about a mile southwest of the East Gallatin River. The average elevation of the parcel is about 4,725 feet. The immediate vicinity of the site has seen primarily agricultural use since the 1860s, but urban development is now encroaching into the area. Land both east and west of the property is now occupied by non-historic residential development, and other parcels in the immediate area are also being subdivided. Two overview photographs of the site are attached(Figures 2 and 3, page 5). Although the land is not currently under cultivation, the appearance of the ground indicates that it has been repeatedly plowed over the years. The property is currently vegetated with native and Historic Preservation Consulting: History,Architecture,and Archaeology non-native shortgrasses; small clumps of non-native shrubs also exist in the northern half of the site. Using a map provided by C&H Engineering as a guide, RTI conducted an intensive-level pedestrian inventory of the subject property in October 2003. The perimeter of the property was first examined; a series of east-west transects were then completed, with a transect interval of no more than 15 meters. Visibility in the survey area varied, but averaged about 20%, primarily due to dense grass cover. To compensate for this, scattered areas with higher visibility were inspected more closely. The occupied residential lot located at the southwest corner of the subdivision was not inventoried; the buildings on that parcel are all clearly of recent origin, however. No prehistoric sites were located during the inventory. One historic archaeological site was identified, however: the berm of an abandoned railway grade running in a rough east-west direction across the northern portion of the property (Figure 3). Shallow drainage ditches parallel the berm on both sides; it appears that the berm was created from the material excavated to form the ditches. The segment of railway grade traversing the site is approximately 800 feet long, and the average width of the ground disturbance is about 30 feet. No surface artifacts or other features were located on the berm or adjoining areas. Sire 24GA990: Northern Pacific Railway "Low Line" The railway grade was found to be short segment of previously-recorded site 24GA999-- the former Northern Pacific Railway's alternate main line across the Gallatin Valley, a route known informally as the "Low Line." The "Low Line" was constructed to provide a low-gradient alternative to the railway's original, primary route across the Gallatin Valley. The original Northern Pacific line through the area—part of a St. Paul-Puget Sound main line completed in 1883—crossed the Gallatin Valley with a nearly-straight southeast-northwest alignment between Logan and Bozeman. Eastbound, this line required long gradients of between 0.5 and 1.0 percent, a moderately difficult climb for steam locomotives pulling heavy trains. In the early twentieth century, the Northern Pacific invested in extensive improvements to its primary routes, to increase track capacity and ease traffic bottlenecks. One of the last such projects was completed in 1919: an alternative route known as the "Low Line" between Logan and Bozeman, intended for use by eastbound through freight trains. The Low Line was a 33.3- mile long, S-shaped route across the valley floor, crossing the original main line at an interlocking 2.2 miles east of Belgrade. Between Logan and Bozeman, the new trackage was 9.7 miles longer than the original line, making possible a gentler grade. The Low Line featured a steady 0.4 percent grade, compensated (reduced) on curves. The Low Line remained an important component of the Northern Pacific's transcontinental route as long as steam locomotives continued to pull freight trains. The decade following World War II, however, saw the emergence of the diesel-electric locomotive as the preferred motive power for American railroads. Among the advantages of the diesel was its greater efficiency in pulling heavy trains on uphill grades, such as those on the Northern Pacific's original line through the Gallatin Valley. By the late 1950s, the Northern Pacific had replaced all its steam locomotives with diesel-electric power. This obviated most of the need for the Low Line, and use of the route ended in December 1956. By the end of the following year, the line had been completely dismantled. Results and Evaluation Several previous inventories have determined that, overall, the grade of the Northern Pacific Low Line(site 24GA999) is historically significant as a representation of the extensive improvements the railroad made to its physical plant in the early twentieth century. The observed segment of the former rail right-of-way still retains much of its railway character. While the track is gone, the subgrade rises distinctly above the surrounding land. The flanking borrow pits and right-of-way fences further convey original railway design and use. The integrity of this surveyed segment,however,has been greatly diminished by the fact that modem development to both the east and west has destroyed portions of the grade,leaving only a relatively short length of intact grade at this location. While the observed segment of site 24GA999 contributes to the overall significance of the site, longer stretches of undisturbed right- of-way—more visually characteristic -- still survive in numerous other locations along the Low Line route. The possible loss of this segment will not destroy the eligibility of the site as a whole. Summary RTI conducted a cultural resources inventory for a proposed development in Section 35, Township 1 South,Range 5 East. Only one cultural site was found in the area, an abandoned railroad grade that had been previously recorded as site 24GA999. The proposed development will result in the removal of a small segment of the grade associated with this site,but the resulting impact will not impact the eligibility of site 24GA999 as a whole. No further cultural resource work is recommended. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to provide this report. If there are any questions about its contents, please call me at(406)782-0494. Sincerely, Mark Hufsteder Historian File: 03-013 z-z6s 465\ tfIs i = 966PT Site 24GA999 34 Northern Pacific l 867 S E Railway"Low Line" 35 4700 j nii 1 � 1 s I It 474 • - t 47Z8T • ? I 4725 T i n Project Area 1� I- ' + W.K.• I f i Trailer ( ; a 1 Pa fk I ( ;4768AT aw � i I i rN7, 1 �• � •�( X t ;� ij 0 �tij i• 1 7•;if t �J.Y7,T Q Project Area BAXTER SQUARE SUBDIVISION N GALLATIN COUNTY U.S.G.S.: Bozeman,MT(1987) Section 35,T1 S R5E Figure 1. Location map of the project area. Baxter Square Subdivision page 4 1 / If 1 Figure 2. Baxter Square Subdivision site from Baxter Lane. View to north. Figure 3. Portion of former Northern Pacific Railway grade(24GA999). View to west-northwest. Baxter Square Subdivision page 5 MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING FOR SUBDIVISION PLANNING (FINAL PLAT APPROVAL) Projected date for Final Plat approval 10 03 Date MOU received 144p r; > This Memoranda of Understanding exists between the Gallatin County Weed Control District, hereafter referred to as "District" and DAK L.L.C. (Please Print Full Name) of- 317 Sanders Avenue Bozeman MT 59715. 580-0481 (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) AND Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C. 8289 Huffine Lane, Bozeman, MT 59718 (586-620D hereinafter referred to as "Cooperator", for the purpose of addressing the issues of noxious weeds and the revegetation of disturbed areas on land(s) within Baxter Square Subdivision (Name of Subdivision) al Description S1/2. Section 35 T 1S R . 5E Under this Memoranda, the Cooperator has been informed of, and has agreed to comply with, the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements of the Gallatin County Weed Control District,the Montana County Weed Control Act, and the Gallatin County Weed Control District's Noxious Weed Management Plan as it relates to the above .named property. While as a landowner, the Cooperator will colrnplywith the Noxious Weed Management ent and Revegetation Requirements ents on i a yearly .basis as needed. The Cooperator has also submitted to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office a copy of the Subdivision Covenants that complies with the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. ad Board Chairman/ erviso ooperator A p n ( t�, 2x✓O3 C� Date Date Baxter Square Subdivision • Area Tabulations Individual Lots Lot Lot Area(ft2) Lot Area Excluding `Building %Building Driveway %Driveway Liveable Private Street Easement Area(ft2) Coverage Area(ft2) Space(ft2) FAR Block 1, Lot 1 6,494 3,655 1,092 29.9% 237 6.5% 1,500 0.41 Lot 2 3,016 2,535 1,100 43.4% 309 12.2% 1,721 0.68 Lot 3 3,596 3,022 1,105 36.6% 299 9.9% 1,721 0.57 Lot 4 3,596 3,022 1,105 36.6% 318 10.5% 1,721 0.57 Lot 5 4,640 3,870 1,105 28.6% 252 6.5% 1,721 0.44 Lot 6 3,454 3,454 1,102 31.9% 312 9.0% 1,721 0.50 Lot 7 2,914 2,914 1,106 38.0% 245 8.4% 1,721 0.59 Lot 8 2,914 2,914 1,105 37.9% 300 10.3% 1,721 0.59 Lot 9 2,444 2,444 1,100 45.0% 318 .13.0% 1,721 0.70 Lot 10 5,265 3,526 1,092 31.0% 250 7.1% 1,500 0.43 Lot 11 17,198 14,479 3,160 21.8% 4,439 30.7% 6,736 0.47 Lot 12 3,627 3,053 1,092 35.8% 260 8.5% 1,721 0.56 Lot 13 3,042 2,561 1,088 42.5% 325 12.7% 1,721 0.67 Lot 14 5,832 4,486 1,116 24.9% 373 8.3% 1,721 0.38 Lot 15 10,098 7,588 1,588 20.9% 366 4.8% 1,102 0.15 Lot 16 2,842 2,842 938 33.0% 473 16.6% 1,093 0.38 Lot 17 2,752 2,752 938 34.1% 430 15.6% 1,093 0.40 Lot 18 3,228 3,228 938 29.1% 297 9.2% 1,721 0.53 Lot 19 3,523 3,523 1,105 31.4% 299 8.5% 1,721 0.49 ., Lot 20 2,843 2,843 1,102 38.8% 350 12.3% 1,721 0.61 Lot 21 2,775 2,775 1,102 39.7% 309 11.1% 1,721 0.62 Lot 22 3,263 3,263 1,092 33.5% 234 7.2% 1,721 0.53 Lot 23 3,255 3,255 1,105 33.9% 255 7.8% 1,721 0.53 Lot 24 2,730 2,730 1,105 40.5% 327 12.0% 1,721 0.63 Lot 25 2,730 2,730 1,105 40.5% 331 12.1% 1,721 0.63 Lot 26 3,255 3,255 1,092 33.5% 264 8.1% 1,721 0.53 Lot 27 3,255 3,255 1,105 33.9% 260 8.0% 1,721 0.53 Lot 28 2,730 2,730 1,102 40.4% 332 12.2% 1,721 0.63 Lot 29 2,730 2,730 1,102 40.4% 336 12.3% 1,721 0.63 Lot 30 5,355 5,355 1,092 20.4% 270 5.0% 1,721 0.32 Block 2,Lot 1 4,738 4,738 1,180 24.9% 360 7.6% 1,800 0.38 Lott 2,022 2,022 820 40.6% 224 11.1% 1,401 0.69 Lot 3 2,555 2,555 820 32.1% 221 8.6% 1,401 0.55 Lot 3,431 3,431 1,096 31.9% 382 11.1% 1,637 0.48 Lot 5 3,005 3,005 1,095 36.4% 377 12.5% 1,637 0.54 Lot 6 3,018 3,018 1,097' ` 36.3% 367 12.2% 1,637 0.54 Lot 7 3,539 3,539 1,094 30.9% 362 10.2% 1,637 0.46 Lot 8 3,533 3,533 1,096 31.0% 374 10.6% 1,637 0.46 Lot 9 . 2,220 2,220. 820 36.9% 243 10.9% 1,401 0.63 Lot 10 3,066 3,066 1,096 35.7% 452 14.7% 1,637 0.53 Lot 11 7,888 5,778 1,272 22.0% 349 6.0% 1,800 0.31 Lot 12 9,992 5,648 1,272 22.5% 349 6.2% 1,800 0.32 Lot 13 4,074 3,083 1,096 35.5% 380 12.3% 1,637 0.53 Lot 14 2,976 2,249 820 36.5% 248 11.0% 1.401 0.62 Lot 15 4,714 3,557 1,096 30.8% 424 11.9% 1,637 0.46 Lot 16 4,751 3,594 1,096 30.5% 373 10.4% 1,637 0.46 Lot 17 4,107 3,115 1,096 35.2% 440 14.1% 1,637 0.53 Lot 18 4,025 3,019 1,096 36.3% 429 14.2% 1,637 0.54 Lot 19 4,561 3,383 1,096 32.4% 501 14.8% 1,637 0.48 Lot 20 3,452 3,543 820 23.1% 301 8.5% 1,401 0.40 Lot 21 2,770 2,029 820 40.4% 333 16.4% 1,401 0.69 Lot 22 6,336 4,818 1,180 24.5% 340 7.1% 1,800 0.37 Lot 23 57,120 57,120 4,102 7.2% 1,100 1.9% 3,000 Block 3,Lot 1 4,797 3,054 1,092 35.8% 291 9.5% 1,721 0.56 Lot 2 3,042 2,561 1,102 43.0% 258 10.1% 1,721 0.67 Lot 3 3,042 2,561 1,102 43.0% 353 13.8% 1,721 0.67 Lot 3,627 3,054 1,106 36.2% 283 9.3% 1,721 0.56 Lot 5 3,627 3,054 1,092 35.8% 291 9.5% 1,721 0.56 Lot 6 3,042 2,561 1,102 43.0% 258 10.1% 1,721 0.67 Lot 7 3,042 2,561 1,102 43.0% 353 13.8% 1,721 0.67 Lot 8 3,627 3,340 1,106 33.1% 283 8.5% 1,721 0.52 Lot 9 3,627 3,340 1,092 32.7% 291 8.7% 1,721 0.52 Lot 10 3,042 2,561 1,102 43.0% 358 14.0% 1,721 0.67 Lot 11 3,042 2,561 1,102 43.0% 353 13.8% 1,721 0.67 Lot 12 3,627 03,340 1,106 33.1% 283 /0 1,721 0.52 Lot 13 16,943 14,254 3,160 22.2% 4,793 0.1. 6,736 0.47 Lot 14 9,534 5,311 1,587 29.9% 388 7.3% 1,102 0.21 Lot 15 3,198 2,340 1,102 47.1% 318 13.6% 1,721 0.74 Lot 16 3,813 2,790 1,112 39.9% 318 11.4% 1,721 0.62 Lot 17 3,813 2,790 1,092 39.1% 229 8.2% 1,721 0.62 Lot 18 3,198 2,340 1,103 47.1% 291 12.4% 1,721 0.74 Lot 19 3,813 2,790 1,102 39.5% 300 10.8% 1,721 0.62 Lot 20 4,305 3,150 1,096 34.8% 361 11.5% 1,637 0.52 Lot 21 2,706 1,980 820 41.4% 217 11.0% 1,401 0.71 Lot 22 4,305 3,150 1,096 34.8% 353 11.2% 1,637 0.52 Lot 23 4,305 3,150 1,096 34.8% 397 12.6% 1,637 0.52 Lot 24 5,627 4,118 1,096 26.6% 392 9.5% 1,637 0.40 Lot 25 5,856 4,163 1,096 26.3% 417 10.0% 1,637 0.39 Lot 26 4,480 3,185 1,096 34.4% 412 12.9% 1,637 0.51 Lot 27 4,480 3,185 1,096 34.4% 421 13.2% 1,637 0.51 Lot 28 4,816 2,002 820 41.0% 254 12.7% 1,401 0.70 Lot 29 4,480 3,185 1,096 34.4% 413 13.0% 1,637 0.51 Lot 30 3,968 2,821 1,102 39.1% 328 11.6% 1,721 0.61 Lot 31 3,328 2,366 1,103 46.6% 320 13.5% 1,721 0.73 Lot 32 3,968 2,821 1,092 38.7% 490 17.4% 1,721 0.61 Lot 33 3,968 2,821 1,112 39.4% 412 14.6% 1,721 0.61 Lot 34 3,328 2,366 1,102 46.6% 413 17.5% 1,721 0.73 Lot 35 9,921 5,370 1,587 29.6% 390 7.3% 1,102 0.21 Block4,Lot 1 3,489 3,489 1,096 31.4% 356 10.2% 1,637 0.47 Lot 2 2,683 2,683 1,096 40.8% 352 13.1% 1,637 0.61 Lot 3 3,130 3,130 1,096 35.0% 346 11.1% 1,637 0.52 Lot 4 3,129 3,129 1,096 35.0% 352 11.2% 1,637 0.52 Lot 5 1,967 1,967 820 41.7% 213 10.8% 1,401 0.71 Lot 6 3,128 3,128 1,096 35.0% 344 11.0% 1,637 0.52 Lot 7 3,128 3,128 1,096 35.0% 390 12.5% 1,637 0.52 Lot 8 1,965 1,965 820 41.7% 237 12.1% 1,401 0.71 Lot 1,964 1,964 820 41.8% 231 11.8% 1,401 0.71 Lot 10 3,073 3,073 1,096 35.7% 361 11.7% 1,637 0.53 Lot 11 2,958 2,958 1,096 37.1% 410 13.9% 1,637 0.55 Lot 12 1,798 1,798 820 45.6% 231 12.8% 1,401 0.78 Lot 13 2,391 2,391 1,096 45.8% 334 14.0% 1,637 0.68 Lot 14 4,425 4,425 1,272 28.7% 374 8.5% 1,800 0.41 Averages= 4,626 3,913 1,152 35.1% 423 11.3% 0.54 0 VICINITY MAP' BAXTER SQUARE SUBDIVISION P.U.D. VICINITY MAP y ..t,,zx n •� Riff '` ` ♦/ � rf 1 1 M'1 1 S it R-0v{~ RJ Qfaw.tx"-3T � h1 I 1 / 8.2 Lora a -- — ' i .•��a[.[� r a M t i � 31� .. h R-1 f i � M=1 I 13-2 11 f P. [�.n{naeu B-1 r � l�raciworx i{ R}.1r y / �r1 i R-1 ,e,.i c,i�1 G� 11 - ii q •'tGrit'al N NOT TO SCALE M N t� 3 v to rn cM N O 0 O ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. FIdel1wreiss ering •Structural RugineerW .land Surveying Drive Bozeman Montana 59718 5•Paz:(406)587-me•info@;�engineers.com f , G:\c&h\02\02395\OVERALL.dwg, 11/16/2004 10:26:41 AM, \\SATURN\HP Color LaserJet 5500 PCL 6 �1L C Street cn co �� Buckrake-Avenue F q �. A = L Lovitt Stre t' - Building Clusters Is • Cluster Lot Area(ft2) Cluster Area Excluding Building %Building Driveway %Driveway Lots per Average Liveable Private Street Easement Area(ft2) Coverage Area(ft2) Cluster Lot Size Space(ft2) FAR Cluster-1 14,070 14,070 4,402 31.3% 1,198 8.5% 4 3,518 6,884 0.49 Cluster 11,970 11,970 4,408 36.8% 1,177 9.8% 4 2,993 6,884 0.58 Cluster 3 12,404 12,404 4,402 35.5% 1,192 9.6% 4 3,101 6,884 0.55 Cluster 4 18,920 16,410 4,401 26.8% 1,566 9.5% 4 4,103 5,009 0.31 Cluster 5 8,236 6,892 2,211 32.1% 570 8.3% 2 3,446 3,442 0.50 Cluster 6 13,106 9,212 3,297 35.8% 845 9.2% 3 3,071 4,942 0.54 Cluster 7 6,368 6,368 2,208 34.7% 557 8.7% 2 3,184 3,442 0.54 Cluster 10,623 8,884 3,297 37.1% 868 9.8% 3 2,961 4,942 0.56 Cluster 12,501 10,100 3,297 32.6% 958 9.5% 3 3,367 5,163 0.51 Cluster 10 17,198 14,479 3,160 21.8% 4,439 30.7% 1 14,479 6,736 0.47 Cluster 11 14,508 11,230 4,402 39.2% 1,185 10.6% 4 2,808 6,884 0.61 Cluster 12 13,338 11,516 4,408 38.3% 1,185 10.3% 4 2,879 6,884 0.60 Cluster 13 13,338 11,802 4,408 37.3% 1,285 10.9% 4 2,951 6,884 0.58 Cluster 14 16,943 14,254 3,160 22.2% 4,793 33.6% 1 14,254 6,736 0.47 Cluster 15 17,217 10,557 3,801 36.0% 1,215 11.5% 3 3,519 4,544 0.43 Cluster 16 16,545 10,441 3,801 36.4% 1,024 9.8% 3 3,480 4,544 0.44 Cluster 17 11,264 8,008 3,297 41.2% 1,138 14.2% 3 2,669 5,163 0.64 Cluster 18 10,824 7,920 3,297 41.6% 820 10.4% 3 2,640 5,163 0.65 Cluster 19 13,776 8,372 3,012 36.0% 1,088 13.0% 3 2,791 4,675 0.56 Cluster20 11,316 8,280 3,012 36.4% 931 11.2% 3 2,760 4,675 0.56 Cluster21 10,336 7,348 2,192 29.8% 829 11.3% 2 3,674 3,274 0.45 Cluster 22 9,932 7,268 2,192 30.2% 789 10.9% 2 3,634 3,274 0.45 Cluster23 9,302 9,302 3,288 35.3% 1,054 11.3% 3 3,101 4,911 0.53 Cluster 24 8,224 8,224 3,012 36.6% 909 11.1% 3 2,741 4,675 0.57 Cluster25 10,130 10,130 3,832 37.8% 1,219 12.0% 4 2,533 6,076 0.60 Cluster26 11,572 11,572 4,284 37.0% 1,349 11.7% 4 2,893 6,475 0.56 Cluster27 12,558 10,390 2,820 27.1% 974 9.4% 3 3,463 4,602 0.44 Cluster 28 9,315 9,315 2,820 30.3% 805 8.6% 3 3,105 4,602 0.49 Cluster 29 12,993 12,993 4,384 33.7% 1,488 11.5% 4 3,248 6,548 0.50 Cluster 30 17,444 13,111 4,380 33.4% 1,743 13.3% 4 3,278 6,548 0.50 Cluster 31 21,756 14,537 4,284 29.5% 1,401 9.6% 4 3,634 6,475 0.45 Cluster32 16,707 14,597 4,284 29.3% 1,418 9.7% 2 7,299 6,475 0.44 Averages= 12,960 10,686 3,545 33.7% 1,313 11.9% 3,987 5,450 0.52 City of Bozeman ♦ 3`� Receipt Bozeman, Montana `�- �'� -�� -` (� 20_ Received of AlAblM.L 4 /},142•14 16AP-411 1 .a'li� /t_2 ' � J •" the sum of,v ~-"`-Dollars ' for w09_ t � / CITY OF BOZEMAN • l'i1- ` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406:582-2260 20'East Olive Street ! fax 406-582-22M " P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771 -1230 w.bozeman.net JA N 2005 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1.Name of Project/Development: FDtkA(!c vare PQ-D- _Cx)W1'V1S10r'\, 2. Property Owner Information: Name: 317 SWars Avenue_ 13707 Camp CAT& k0DA Mailing Address: OZP- Q t I\kT 5Pl7I% Fh. 539-5,6q9 f 2A Eh.539-5540 Phone: Fkx'• 512,"ON5 Fox', 2.$2-7917 3.Applicant Information: Name: mwr + E-mail Address: Ir&D @ ckern�neeu coM Mailing Address: 202�W2tS� !�'., �Z2MQI�� MT 50I'71� Phone: 5$7-1 1 IS FAX: SV 7'-g740<3 4. Representative Information: EKG `f aJZS i L .- E-mail Address: J�h� 1\kgt r �M Name: k SOLI 1 p Mailing Address: 2$5 Fror�"r �(lY,�� ant MT 5971' Phone: 551O-1311 FAX: 5�10-I�O7 5. Legal Description: F 4�e UW 1/- e,W' 1 �- �lbpn 35 1. IS i 6. Street Address: 5;2 R` 59 In i r �,�, ` 1 l�,• II I 7. Project Description: Rp,(1nd U 4`�P-velopma4-,Tp '1rx]Je,OR -6w0)Djse. W5, o_"�pl-pu t4s" ; and 1.. 5, I•� ��r"►� - ivl": 1 8. Zoning Designation(s): 3 9. Current Land Use(s): �es� al i 10.Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: 'V'0_5ide4-CL1 Page 1 r• 11. Gross Area: Acres: I�R1W7Square Feet: 1Q�I 12. Net Area: Acres:lo��j Square Feet:�701�(pl 13.-Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes, answer question 13a FrNo,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor 14. Will this application require a deviation(s)? FE?Yes (p-eyjW$J1 ❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ 0.Planned Unit Development-Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑ P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑ B. Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site dQ.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑ R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan _ ❑ D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑ S. Subdivision Pre-application ❑ E. Special Temporary Use Permit ❑ T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑ F. Sketch Plan/COA ❑ U. Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G. Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑ V.'Subdivision Exemption ❑ H. Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑ I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑ K. Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑ Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑ K. Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z. Zoning Variance ❑L. Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA. Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑ M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB. Growth.Policy Text Amendment ❑ N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-.by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than.8/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and.tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different) before the sulimittalwill be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicants) and/or property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I (kyle) hereby certify that the above information is true and.correct to the best.of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature:. i Date: Applicant's Signature: b Date: I Property Owner's Signature: �� Date: AS S— j Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: i Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) i OU28 00S . G:2:M RECEIPT # 118729 G A E £ A T i N C O U N T Y . ' CLERKARDREC0@DEp B 0 Z E M A R ! M T . . » FROM : V053 m1WM7 B : CASH! . . FILE NO.: 210266S # Po 2 4 10:24A. 000: (KC) MIN NEGUS . DOCUMENT FEE: 24.00 TOTAL RECEIPT ----0 2 tam AMOUNT (Check) RECEIVED ----> 24.00 Check N --- q 3242 . . CHANGE %@e ! Check Received , Check: 0 -> CJ3242 Z $24.00 , ** RECEIPT *** CONDITION&OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMTr CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BAXTER SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAXTER LANE WEST OF THE THOMAS DRIVE AND BAXTER LANE INTERSECTION, BOZEMAN,MONTANA WHEREAS,the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified architectural and landscape plan for 101 townhouse units and 2 multi-household buildings with the relaxation of Section 18.20.020"Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R 3" zoning district, Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet, Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback and Section 18.50.110.K"No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards"to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as E'/2 Wl/z SE'/a SW'/a, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County,Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following twenty-one (21) conditions and code provisions: Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,including excavation and footing preparation,but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of securityshall be valid for a period of not less than twelve(12)months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan,building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan",landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience,or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0"Parking Lot Landscaping,"which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibilityon adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A, 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared bya qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as'wheel stops,an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required$100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed"Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing,as defined in Chapter 18.04,if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d"Open Space Maintenance Plan," requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas,communally owned facilities,and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city, the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines,including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers,with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2 "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements". The City of Bozeman shall be third partyto anychanges or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of anysignage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 20. Adequate snow storage area must be designated on the final site plan identifying areas to store snow off of the streets and sidewalks and outside the street vision triangles. 21. The property owner shall provide screening along the east propertyline adjacent to the 8-plexes that complies with the zoning ordinance and is acceptable to the property owner, adjacent property owners and the City of Bozeman. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN, that the above-noted twenty-one (21) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as a residential Planned Unit Development. DATED THIS ,%-o DAY OF Al, 46A , 20 Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDOWNER Arru Grant Baxter Square, L.L.C. STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this 4�- day of Met",-- ,2005,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Ami Grant, known to me to be the A-/it be e— of Baxter Square,L.L.C.,the companythat executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for and on behalf of said company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Arinted Name eLj-z, ,u�, trsU F-- Notary Public f e State of Montana Residing at O7, , `,Mot a My Commission Expires LANDOWNER Evert Wierda CAVU, L.L.0 STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this /G dayof ,2005,before me,the undersigned,a Notary P for the State of Montana, personally appeared Evert Wierda, known to me to be the ;711?1;0VkV (print title here) of CAVU, L.L.C., the company that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) a`��Nan+�i►i�q�ri�., •� *TARIAC (Printed Nam4 Here) ' • _ Notary Public for the State of Montana S , ��', Residing at ,Montana '1P,� . My Commission Expires Fri Baxter Square Zonin .PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 4 Engineering and Surveying Inc. 205 Edelweiss Drive•Bozeman.Montana 59718 AUG Phone(405)587-1115•Fax(406)587-9768 - 6 2004 www.r-hengineers.com•info@chengineers.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL�, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Ty OEVF!OP','ENl' DATE: -August 6, 2004 TO: City of Bozeman Planning Dept. Attn: Jami Morris FROM: Matt Cotterman RE: Baxter Square -request for PUD Plan Approval Extension QTY. DESCRIPTION 1 Letter PURPOSE: As You Requested For Design Revisions For Your Information/Records For Your Signature/return ✓ For Your Approval Other: (See Remarks) U.S. Mail Federal Express ✓ Hand Delivered For Pick Up REMARKS: Copies to: • 19'�7 0 C &-=, Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 205 Edelweiss Drive • Bozeman, Montana 59718 • Phone(406)587-1115 Fax(406) 587-9768 www.chengineers.com •E-Mail: info@chengineers.com 1 August 6, 2004 i City of Bozeman Planning Dept. Hu O - C A4 IJ Attn: Andy Epple, Planning Director 20 E. Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 -' Bozeman,MT 59771-1230 RE: Baxter Square Subdivision PUD, Preliminary Plan Extension Request(02395) Dear Andy, On behalf of Baxter Square Partners and CAVU L.L.C. we formally request a six month extension on the PUD Preliminary Plan approval for Baxter Square Subdivision. Completion of the PUD Final Plan has been delayed by issues with wetlands in the park area. We will be submitting the PUD Final Plan as soon as a formal decision has been made by the City Commission and approval granted by the Army Corps. of Engineers. Please call if you have any comments or questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Ma a an,4rr — cc: Baxter Square Partners CAVU, L.L.C. Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying 08/06/2004 _ 07_39 4065879768 C&H ENGINEERING PAGE 01 0 r Engineering and Surveying Inc. 205 Edelwelss Drive•Bozeman, Montana 59718 Phone(408)587-1115•Fm(4061 587-9788 www.chengineem.aom•infnfoheromers.wm FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: August 6,2004 TO: City of Bozeman Planning Department ATTN: Jami Morris FAX: RE: Banter Square-request for PUD Plan extension SENDER: Matt Cottexnan L u should receive 2 pages(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all a es, please call 406 587-1115 Jami, I will send the original in the mail. Please let me know if you need anything additional. Thanks, Matt cc: Ami Grant(587-5453) Evert Wierda(282-7927) 08/06/2004 07:39 4065879768 C&H ENGINEERING PAGE 02 • • 1 r FC 'm ' Engineering end Surveying,Inc. } 205 Edelweiss Drive• Bozeman, Montane 59719•Phone f4061 587.1115 Fax(406)587-9768 wv�w.chengineers,00m•E-Mail: info@chenginsers,00m ,August 6, 2004 City of Bozeman Planning Dept. Atta: Andy Epple,Planning Director 20 E. Olive Street P.O.Box 1230 Bozeman,MT 59771-1230 RE: Baxter Square Subdivision PUD,Preliminary Plan Extension Request(02395) Dear,Andy, On behalf of Baxter Square Partners and CAVU L.L.C.we formally request a six month extension on the PUD Preliminary Plan approval for Baxter Square Subdivision. Completion of the PUD Final Plan has been delayed by issues with wetlands in the park area, We will be submitting the PUD Final Plan as soon as a formal decision has been made by the City Commission and approval granted by the Army Corps. of Engineers. Please call if you have any comments or questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Ma an cc: Baxter Square Partners CAVU, L.L.C. Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying a CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BAXTER SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAXTER LANE WEST OF THE THOMAS DRIVE AND BAXTER LANE INTERSECTION,BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS,the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified architectural and landscape plan for 101 townhouse units and 2 multi-household buildings with the relaxation of Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district, Section 18.20.030"Lot Area and Width"to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet,Section 18.50.060.A"Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback and Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the.five foot side yard setback. WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as E%2 W%2 SE'/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following twenty-one (21) conditions and code provisions: Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6. The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions,corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12)months;however,the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine(9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan,building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience,or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops,an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces",parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed"Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d"Open Space Maintenance Plan,"requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city,the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines,including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers,with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2"Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements".The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 20. Adequate snow storage area must be designated on the final site plan identifying areas to store snow off of the streets and sidewalks and outside the street vision triangles. 21. The property owner shall provide screening along the east property line adjacent to the 8- plexes that complies with the zoning ordinance and is acceptable to the property owner, adjacent property owners and the City of Bozeman. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted twenty-one (21) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as a commercial Planned Unit Development. DATED THIS DAY OF , 20 Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDOWNER Arm Grant Baxter Square, L.L.C. STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 20 ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Arm Grant, known to me to be the of Baxter Square, L.L.C., the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana My Commission Expires LANDOWNER Evert Wierda STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 20 ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared Evert Wierda,known to be the persons whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 4 j r • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT My Commission Expires LANDOWNER Steve Nicoll Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C. STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 20 ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Steve Nicoll, known to me to be the of Buffalo Land Management,L.L.C.,the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana My Commission Expires Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 5 _ 19 - 39. All lots shall be served by a sewer main extended from the north near Cattail Drive. No direct connection to the Baxter sewer will be allowed. 40. The center east/west public street shall be improved to a full city standard local street from the eastern boundary of this subdivision to North 27th Avenue/Thomas Lane. 41. An additional 0.6 acres of parkland dedication is required. Lots 54 and 55 shall be removed and added to the land adjacent to the park and the remaining required acreage shall be received as cash-in-lieu as written in Condition No. 11. 42. The overhead power line across the park shall be relocated or buried to avoid interference with park use and public safety. 43. The north end of the trail, near the stream/ditch, shall be located so as to continue along the stream/ditch when the property to the west is developed. 44. The covenants shall include a section precluding snow storage on the streets and sidewalks. A copy of an approved snow storage plan shall also be included in the recorded covenants. 45. The applicants are required to provide two additional groundwater test pits during the month of August. The plat shall include restrictive language for construction if determined necessary by the Engineering and Building Departments. Record of the groundwater depth shall be provided on the plat. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Public hearing-Conditional,Use iPermit for Planned Unit Development-C&H Engineering for Evert Wierda, Buffalo Land Management, LLC, and Baxter Square Partners LLC - allow construction of 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit apartment buildings on 18 acres described as the E'/Z WYz,SE% SW'/4, Section 35, T1 S, R5E, MPM, with relaxations from Sections 18.20.020 to allow two 8-plex condominium buildings in R-3 zoning district: 18.20.030,to allow two 8-plex townhouse clusters on average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; 18.20.050 to allow townhouses to encroach up to 1'/2 feet into 20-foot front yard setback; 18.50.060.A.,to allow townhouse patios to encroach up to 10 feet into 20-foot rear yard setback; 18.50.060.C.,to allow townhouses to encroach up to 2 feet into 15-foot corner side yard setback; 18.50.110.B.,to allow up to 8-foot reduction to standard drive aisle width of 26-feet for 8-plex parking lots and to allow townhouse driveway stall length to be reduced from 20 feet to 18 feet; and 18.50.11 OX, to allow parking lots for 8-plexes to encroach up to 7 feet into 20-foot front yard setback and 5 feet into 5-foot side yard setback (along north side of Baxter Lane west of its intersection with Thomas Drive) (Z-03132) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit for the Baxter Square Planned Unit Development,as requested by by C&H Engineering and JKG and Associates for Evert Wierda, Buffalo Land Management, LLC,and Baxter Square Partners,LLC, under Application No.Z-03132, to allow construction of 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit condominium buildings on 18 acres described as the East one-half,West one-half,Southeast one-quarter,Southwest one-quarter of Section 35,Township 1 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian,with relaxations from the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code, as follows: Section 18.20.020,to allow two 8-plex condominium buildings in the R-3 zoning district;Section 18.20.030,to allow two 8-plex condominium clusters on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; Section 18.20.050, to allow townhouses to encroach up to 1'/2 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback;Section 18.50.060.A.,to allow townhouse patios to encroach up to 10 feet into the 20-foot rear yard setback; Section 18.50.060.C., to allow townhouses to encroach up to 2 feet into the 15-foot corner side yard setback; Section 18.50.110.B., to allow up to an 8-foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of 26-feet for 8-plex parking lots and to allow townhouse driveway stall length to be reduced from 20 feet to 18 feet; and Section 18.50.110.K., to allow parking lots for 8-plexes to encroach up to 7 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback and 5 feet into the 5-foot side yard setback. The subject property is located along the north side of Baxter Lane, west of its intersection with Thomas Drive. 08-11-03 Mayor Kirchhoff opened the public hearing. Assistant Planner Jami Morris presented the staff report. She reviewed the numerous relaxations being requested in conjunction with this planned unit development, noting that many of them are based on the input received during informal review of this proposal. She indicated that some of the requested relaxations apply to only a few of the units within the overall development. As a result of reviewing these requested relaxations, staff has found it cannot support the relaxations from Section 18.20.050, to allow townhouses to encroach up to 1'/2 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback; from Section 18.50.060.C., to allow townhouses to encroach up to 2 feet into the 15-foot corner side yard setback; and from Section 18.50.110.B.,to allow up to an 8-foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of 26-feet for 8-plex parking lots and to allow townhouse driveway stall length to be reduced from 20 feet to 18 feet. She cautioned that reducing the setback and stall length can create potential conflicts with pedestrian movements, since vehicles may overhang the sidewalk. She indicated that adequate parking is to be provided with the townhouse units having one space in the garage, one space outside the garage, and a third space on the street. If the 8-plex condominium units are to be affordable units, the parking requirement can be reduced to one space per unit; and that amount of parking is being provided. The Assistant Planner stated that staff has reviewed this application in light of the applicable criteria, and staff's comprehensive findings are contained in the written staff report. Based on those findings, staff has forwarded a recommendation for approval, subject to several conditions. Ms. Voss Bowman, applicant, noted that the 8-plexes are not apartment buildings; rather, they are condominium units that will be sold to individuals. Mr. John Sinrud, designer, addressed how the plan will be adjusted in light of staff's inability to support three of the requested relaxations. He indicated that, for those units where the garage was to encroach into the front yard setback, the garage will be moved back, with the square footage being taken out of the home. He noted that the other two relaxations can be addressed simply by ensuring that the condominium units in the 8-plexes are affordable, since adequate parking is being provided to meet those code requirements. Mr. Bruce Campbell, 1163 Thomas Drive, stated he is opposed to the entire subdivision and development. He raised several questions, including how the main electrical transmission line on the alignment of Thomas Drive and North 27th Avenue will be accommodated. He also expressed concern that the recommended improvements to Baxter Lane will result in pockets of wide and narrow street. He asked for assurance that the irrigation well can be shut down in the event of a drought, to ensure he has adequate domestic water. He concluded by identifying the differences in the addressing systems for the city and the county and asked who is responsible for changing the addresses. Assistant Planner Morris stated that staff identified the 8-plexes as apartments based on the style of the buildings. She then noted the zone code does not differentiate between rentals and owner-occupied units; and ensuring the affordability of those units will be the responsibility of a certifying agency. Mr. Per Hjalmersson, C&H Engineering, addressed the questions regarding the location of the electrical transmission line, noting it will remain in the center of the road, in a configuration similar to North 27th Avenue in Harvest Creek Subdivision. He then indicated that if using a well for irrigation becomes an issue for other wells in the area, City water will be used for irrigation in this development. He further noted that irrigation wells in the county are restricted to 35 gallons per minute. Responding to Commissioner Youngman, Assistant Planner Morris indicated that the zone code states that the requirement for screening can be applied when the units are of differing character. She noted that a 6-foot fence or 8-foot vegetation is typically required. She stated that efforts are generally made to integrate development with the surrounding area; but in this instance, it would be appropriate to add a condition requiring screening in light of the adjacent property owner's concerns. She suggested that the screening be as required under the zone code and acceptable to both parties. Assistant Planner Morris noted that these properties will receive city addressing and, as other properties are annexed, they will also be assigned city addresses. She then noted that the County GIS Manager and City GIS Manager are working together to coordinate those changes. 08-11-03 - 21 Responding to Commissioner Youngman, Mr.Sinrud indicated that Planning staff was great to work with, but he has some concerns about the mixed signals from the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board and the lack of comment on the design and architectural elements of this project by the various reviewing agencies. Mayor Kirchhoff stated his only concerns still revolve around the sidewalks. He voiced his appreciation for the applicants' willingness to pursue affordable housing, providing for future connections outside the development, and the architectural elements and the pleasant streetscape that the design provides. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Kirchhoff closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Cetraro, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the Conditional Use Permit for the Baxter Square Planned Unit Development, as requested by by C&H Engineering and JKG and Associates for Evert Wierda, Buffalo Land Management, LLC,and Baxter Square Partners, LLC, under Application No. Z-03132, to allow construction of 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit condominium buildings on 18 acres described as the East one-half,West one-half, Southeast one-quarter, Southwest one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, be approved and that relaxations from the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code be approved as follows: Section 18.20.020, to allow two 8-plex condominium buildings in the R-3 zoning district; Section 18.20.030, to allow two 8-plex condominium clusters on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; Section 18.50.060.A.,to allow townhouse patios to encroach up to 10 feet into the 20-foot rear yard setback; and Section 18.50.110.K., to allow parking lots for 8-plexes to encroach up to 7 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback and 5 feet into the 5-foot side yard setback, subject to the following conditions: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the final site plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. . Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. -s . 5. All of.the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies of a final site plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 7. A building permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of final site plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of final site plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated 08-11-03 • - 22 - • cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine;(9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3. for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3., "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana landscape architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.C., "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaires and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g., "Setback Planting." 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13., "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3., "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces,"parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine." One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible." 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.i., "Affordable Housing," when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d., "Open Space Maintenance Plan," requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city, the property owner shall file the document with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 08-11-03 • - 23 - • 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines, including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers, with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2., "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements." The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 20. Adequate snow storage area must be designated on the final site plan identifying areas to store snow off the streets and sidewalks and outside the street vision triangles. 21. The property owner shall provide screening along the east property line adjacent to the 8-plexes that complies with the zone code and is acceptable to the property owner, adjacent property owners and the City of Bozeman. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Brown and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Public comment No one from the public submitted any comments under this agenda item. Discussion - FYI Items The following "For Your Information" items were forwarded to the Commission. (1) Letter of resignation from the Local Water Quality District Board, dated August 1, 2003, as submitted by Phillip Butterfield. (2) Copy of a letter from the Senior Citizens' Advisory Board, dated June 10, asking that the Commission budget $500 to help defray the costs of printing and mailing the booklet "The Gallatin Valley Senior Source." (3) Letter from the Historic Preservation Advisory Board, dated August 5, asking the Commission to add a position on the board for a high school or college student under 22 years old. (4) Letter from Resource Technologies, Inc., dated August 4, forwarding air monitoring results for the remediation site for the period June 16 through July 29, 2003. (5) Listing of planning projects to be considered at upcoming meetings,dated August 11, 2003. (6) Information from the Community Affordable Housing Advisory Board regarding questions raised by the Commissioners when reviewing the proposed affordable housing policy at the July 28 meeting. 2003. (7) Minutes from the Community Affordable Housing Advisory Board meeting held on July 10, (8) Newsletter from Headwaters Recycling, announcing that the next meeting will be held on August 11 at Three Forks. (9) Agenda for the School District No. 7 Board of Trustees meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 11, at the Willson School. (10) Agenda and revised agenda for the County Commission meeting to be held at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, August 12, at the Courthouse. 08-11-03 • - 24 - • � ' . (11) Agenda for the County Planning Board meeting to be held at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday,August 12, at the Courthouse. (12) Agenda for the Development Review Committee meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, August 12, at the Professional Building. (13) Agenda for the Design Review Board meeting to be held at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 12, at the Professional Building. (14) Agenda for the joint City Planning Board and Zoning Commission meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 12, at the Bozeman Public Library. (15) Street Superintendent John VanDelinder noted that his staff responded to a report on the "pothole line" to find a 6-foot cavern under Kagy Boulevard that a storm sewer had washed out. He stated the road was closed and the needed repairs made today. (16) City Manager Clark Johnson announced that, as of 6:00 p.m. tonight, the fire in the city's watershed has been declared contained. He noted that two 20-person crews remain and two helicopters are on standby. He then noted that the Mystic Lake area may not be reopened to the public until the nights cool down. Mayor Kirchhoff noted it is important to write a letter of thanks to the Forest Service, particularly in light of their response to the fire. (17) Planning Director Andy Epple submitted the following. (1) Noted that the second of the hearings scheduled on the unified development ordinance will be held tomorrow night. (2)Announced that Ed McMahon will be speaking in Livingston on August 17. (18) The Planning Director noted that about six weeks ago, the Commission heard an informal application from Jerry Locati for a large development that involves relocation of an existing casino. Mayor Kirchhoff was absent from that meeting, and the remaining four Commissioners were split on whether to pursue a zone code amendment to allow that to occur. Mayor Kirchhoff stated he is favorable to the overall plan and does not have a problem with relocating the existing casino in conjunction with a large development held in single ownership. Commissioner Brown voiced his objection to writing the code for one person. (19) Staff Attorney Day-Moore noted that under the zoning planned unit development, it states groundwater measurements must be taken May 15 through September 15. (20) Ms. Erin Everett, reporter for the Bozeman Daily Chronicle announced this is her last meeting; she has accepted another assignment upon return from her honeymoon. (21) Commissioner Brown announced that he met with representatives from the Library Board of Trustees and had an opportunity to review the detailed financial statement. (22) Commissioner Cetraro noted he took pictures of the library at Salt Lake City and will bring them in for the Commissioners to see. (23) Mayor Kirchhoff requested that the Clerk of the Commission advertise for the openings on the various advisory boards, including the Beautification Advisory Board, the Local Water Quality District and the Pedestrian/Traffic Safety Committee. (24) Commissioner Youngman noted the Historic Preservation Advisory Board has requested an additional position for a student and asked that this be placed on an agenda for discussion after Labor Day. (25) Mayor Kirchhoff asked if three Commissioners support using$500 from the monies budgeted for board requests to defray a portion of the costs of publishing the brochure for the senior citizens; three of the Commissioners indicated support for doing so. 08-11-03 - ey OF BOZEMAN 0 ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406=582-2260 •� 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net January 12, 2004 JKG&Associates 284 Frontier Drive Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Baxter Square PUD #Z-03132 & Major Subdivision #P-03020 Dear John: On October 6, 2003 the Mayor signed the Findings of Fact and Order for Baxter Square Major Subdivision. Unfortunately, there was an error in the conditions of approval. The revised Findings of Fact were sent back for scheduling on the City Commission agenda but have not been completed to date. Therefore, I have decided to forward an unofficial working copy for your records. Once the revised version is formally approved I will forward the document to you. Additionally, in my haste to wrap up your project I forwarded an incomplete version of the Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use Permit. Since then the Clerk of Commission has provided a final draft of the minutes from the City Commission hearing and conditions #20 and #21 have been added to the official copy. Please call me if your have any questions regarding this matter. Respectfully, ' ^ �i JaL Morris, Associate Planner Enclosures: Modified Findings of Fact Modified Conditions of Approval cc: Buffalo Land Management,L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan,MT 59741 Baxter Square Partners,L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue,Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive,Bozeman, MT 59718 planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 71113rz 1-1 _ 19 - 39. All lots shall be served by a sewer main extended from the north near Cattail Drive. No direct connection to the Baxter sewer will be allowed. 40. The center east/west public street shall be improved to a full city standard local street from the eastern boundary of this subdivision to North 27th Avenue/Thomas Lane.. 41. An additional 0.6 acres of parkland dedication is required. Lots 54 and 55 shall be removed and added to the land adjacent to h'ePpark and the remaining required acreage shall�`e received as cash-in-lieu to in Condition No. 11. 42. The overhead power line across the park shall be relocated or buried to avoid interference with park use and -ublic safety. 43. The north end of the traf, near the stream/ditch, shall be located so as to continue along the stream�/dutch when the property to the west is developed. 44. The coven ants#shall include a sectio precluding snow storage on the streets and sidewalks. A copy of an approved snow storage plan shall also be included in the recorded covenants. 45. he applicants are required to provide two additional groundwater test pits during the month of August. The plat shall include rest it ctive language for construction if determined necessary by the Engineering and Buil`n,g Departments. Record of the groundwater depth shall be provided on the plat. The motion carried by the following Aye and No'vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Pub_lic_hearing- Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit,Development- C&H Engineering for Evert' IkWierda Buffalo Land Management, LLC, and Baxter Square Partners LLC - allow construction of 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit apartment buildings'on 18 acres describedi as the E% VP/2 SE% SW%, Section 35,71 S. R5E, MPM, with relaxations-from Sections 18.20 020 to allow two 8-plex condominium buildings in R-3 zoning district; 18.20.030,to allow two 8-plex townhouse clusters on average lot area less than 3,000 square feet;.18.20.050, to allow townhouses to encroach up to 1/2 feet into 20-foot front yard setback; 18.50.060.A. to allow townhouse patios to encroach up to 10 feet into 20-foot rear yard setback; 18.50.060.C.,to allow townhouses to encroach up to 2 feet into 15-foot corner side yard setback; 18.50.110.B.,to allow up to 8-foot reduction to standard drive aisle width of 26-feet for.8-plex parking lots and to allow townhouse driveway stall length to be reduced from 20 feet to 18 feet; and 18.50.110.K., to allow parking lots for 8-plexes to encroach-up to 7 feet into 20-foot-front yard setback and 5 feet into 5-foot side yard setback (along north side of Baxter Lane west of its intersection with Thomas Drive) (Z=031a2 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit for the Baxter Square Planned Unit Development,as requested by by C&H Engineering and JKG and Associates for Evert Wierda, Buffalo Land Management, LLC,and Baxter Square Partners, LLC, under Application No.Z-03132, to allow construction of 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit condominium buildings on 18 acres described as the East one-half,West one-half,Southeast one-quarter,Southwest one-quarter of Section 35,Township 1 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian,with relaxations from the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code,as follows: Section 18.20:020,to allow two 8-plex condominium buildings in the R-3 zoning district;Section 18.20.030,,to allow two 8-plex condominium clusters on an average lot area less than 3,000 square'feet; Section 18.20.050, to allow townhouses to encroach up to 1'/2 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback; Section 18.50.060.A.,to allow townhouse patios to encroach up to 10 feet into the 20-foot rear yard setback; Section 18.50.060.C., to allow townhouses to encroach up to 2,feet into the 15-foot corner side yard setback; Section 18.50.110.B., to allow up to an 8-foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of 26-feet for 8-plex parking lots and to allow.townhouse driveway stall length to be reduced from 20 feet to 18 feet; and Section 18,50.110.K., to allow parking lots for 8-plexes to encroach up to 7 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback and 5 feet into the 5-foot side yard setback. The subject property is located along the north side of Baxter Lane, west of its intersection with Thomas Drive. 08-11-03 - 20 - • Mayor Kirchhoff opened the public hearing. Assistant Planner Jami Morris presented the staff report. She reviewed the numerous relaxations being requested in conjunction with this planned unit development, noting that many of them are based on the input received during informal review of this proposal. She indicated that some of the requested relaxations apply to only a few of the units within the overall development. As a result of reviewing these requested relaxations, staff has found it cannot support the relaxations from Section 18.20.050, to allow townhouses to encroach up to 1'/2 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback; from Section 18.50.060.C., to allow townhouses to encroach up to 2 feet into the 15-foot corner side yard setback; and from Section 18.50.110.B.,to allow up to an 8-foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of 26-feet for 8-plex parking lots and to allow townhouse driveway stall length to be reduced from 20 feet to 18 feet. She cautioned that reducing the setback and stall length can create potential conflicts with pedestrian movements, since vehicles may overhang the sidewalk. She indicated that adequate parking is to be provided with the townhouse units having one space in the garage, one space outside the garage, and a third space on the street. If the 8-plex condominium units are to be affordable units, the parking requirement can be reduced to one space per unit; and that amount of parking is being provided. The Assistant Planner stated that staff has reviewed this application in light of the applicable criteria, and staff's comprehensive findings are contained in the written staff report. Based on those findings, staff has forwarded a recommendation for approval, subject to several conditions. Ms. Voss Bowman, applicant, noted that the 8-plexes are not apartment buildings; rather, they are condominium units that will be sold to individuals. Mr. John Sinrud, designer, addressed how the plan will be adjusted in light of staff's inability to support three of the requested relaxations. He indicated that, for those units where the garage was to encroach into the front yard setback, the garage will be moved back, with the square footage being taken out of the home. He noted that the other two relaxations can be addressed simply by ensuring that the condominium units in the 8-plexes are affordable, since adequate parking is being provided to meet those code requirements. Mr. Bruce Campbell, 1163 Thomas Drive, stated he is opposed to the entire subdivision and development. He raised several questions, including how the main electrical transmission line on the alignment of Thomas Drive and North 27th Avenue will be accommodated. He also expressed concern that the recommended improvements to Baxter Lane will result in pockets of wide and narrow street. He asked for assurance that the irrigation well can be shut down in the event of a drought, to ensure he has adequate domestic water. He concluded by identifying the differences in the addressing systems for the city and the county and asked who is responsible for changing the addresses. Assistant Planner Morris stated that staff identified the 8-plexes as apartments based on the style of the buildings. She then noted the zone code does not differentiate between rentals and owner-occupied units; and ensuring the affordability of those units will be the responsibility of a certifying agency. Mr. Per Hjalmersson, C&H Engineering, addressed the questions regarding the location of the electrical transmission line, noting it will remain in the center of the road, in a configuration similar to North 27th Avenue in Harvest Creek Subdivision. He then indicated that if using a well for irrigation becomes an issue for other wells in the area, City water will be used for irrigation in this development. He further noted that irrigation wells in the county are restricted to 35 gallons per minute. Responding to Commissioner Youngman, Assistant Planner Morris indicated that the zone code states that the requirement for screening can be applied when the units are of differing character. She noted that a 6-foot fence or 8-foot vegetation is typically required. She stated that efforts are generally made to integrate development with the surrounding area; but in this instance, it would be appropriate to add a condition requiring screening in light of the adjacent property owner's concerns. She suggested that the screening be as required under the zone code and acceptable to both parties. Assistant Planner Morris noted that these properties will receive city addressing and, as other properties are annexed, they will also be assigned city addresses. She then noted that the County GIS Manager and City GIS Manager are working together to coordinate those changes. 08-11-03 Responding to Commissioner Youngman, Mr. Sinrud indicated that Planning staff was great to work with, but he has some concerns about the mixed signals from the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board and the lack of comment on the design and architectural elements of this project by the various reviewing agencies. Mayor Kirchhoff stated his only concerns still revolve around the sidewalks. He voiced his appreciation for the applicants' willingness to pursue affordable housing, providing for future connections outside the development, and the architectural elements and the pleasant streetscape that the design provides. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Kirchhoff closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Cetraro, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the Conditional Use Permit for the Baxter Square Planned Unit Development, as requested by by C&H Engineering and JKG and Associates for Evert Wierda, Buffalo Land Management, LLC,and Baxter Square Partners, LLC, under Application No. Z-03132, to allow construction of 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit condominium buildings on 18 acres described as the East one-half, West one-half, Southeast one-quarter, Southwest one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, be approved and that relaxations from the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code be approved as follows: Section 18.20.020, to allow two 8-plex condominium buildings in the R-3 zoning district; Section 18.20.030, to allow two 8-plex condominium clusters on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; Section 18.50.060.A.,to allow townhouse patios to encroach up to 10 feet into the 20-foot rear yard setback; and Section 18.50.110.K., to allow parking lots for 8-plexes to encroach up to 7 feet into the 20-foot front yard setback and 5 feet into the 5-foot side yard setback, subject to the following conditions: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the final site plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. . Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies of a final site plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 7. A building permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of final site plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of final site plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated 08-11-03 - 22 - • ' cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3. for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3., "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana landscape architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.C., "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting .shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaires and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g., "Setback Planting." 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13., "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3., "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces,"parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine." One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible." 16. Section 18.50.110.F.1.b.i., "Affordable Housing," when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing,all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided,and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d., "Open Space Maintenance Plan," requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city, the property owner shall file the document with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 08-11-03 _ 23 - 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines, including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers, with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2., "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements." The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 20. Adequate snow storage area must be designated on the final site plan identifying areas to store snow off the streets and sidewalks and outside the street vision triangles. 21. The property owner shall provide screening along the east property line adjacent to the 8-plexes that complies with the zone code and is acceptable to the property owner, adjacent property owners and the City of Bozeman. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Brown and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Public comment No one from the public submitted any comments under this agenda item. Discussion - FYI Items The following "For Your Information" items were forwarded to the Commission. (1) Letter of resignation from the Local Water Quality District Board, dated August 1, 2003, as submitted by Phillip Butterfield. (2) Copy of a letter from the Senior Citizens' Advisory Board, dated June 10, asking that the Commission budget $500 to help defray the costs of printing and mailing the booklet"The Gallatin Valley Senior Source." (3) Letter from the Historic Preservation Advisory Board, dated August 5, asking the Commission to add a position on the board for a high school or college student under 22 years old. (4) Letter from Resource Technologies, Inc., dated August 4, forwarding air monitoring results for the remediation site for the period June 16 through July 29, 2003. (5) Listing of planning projects to be considered at upcoming meetings,dated August 11, 2003. (6) Information from the Community Affordable Housing Advisory Board regarding questions raised by the Commissioners when reviewing the proposed affordable housing policy at the July 28 meeting. (7) Minutes from the Community Affordable Housing Advisory Board meeting held on July 10, 2003. (8) Newsletter from Headwaters Recycling, announcing that the next meeting will be held on August 11 at Three Forks. (9) Agenda for the School District No. 7 Board of Trustees meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 11, at the Willson School. (10) Agenda and revised agenda for the County Commission meeting to be held at 9:00 a.m.on Tuesday, August 12, at the Courthouse. 08-11-03 M - 24 - • (11) Agenda for the County Planning Board meeting to be held at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday,August 12, at the Courthouse. (12) Agenda for the Development Review Committee meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, August 12, at the Professional Building. (13) Agenda for the Design Review Board meeting to be held at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 12, at the Professional Building. (14) Agenda for the joint City Planning Board and Zoning Commission meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 12, at the Bozeman Public Library. (15) Street Superintendent John VanDelinder noted that his staff responded to a report on the of line" to find a 6-foot cavern under Kagy Boulevard that a storm sewer had washed out. He stated the road was closed and the needed repairs made today. (16) City Manager Clark Johnson announced that, as of 6:00 p.m. tonight, the fire in the city's watershed has been declared contained. He noted that two 20-person crews remain and two helicopters are on standby. He then noted that the Mystic Lake area may not be reopened to the public until the nights cool down. Mayor Kirchhoff noted it is important to write a letter of thanks to the Forest Service, particularly in light of their response to the fire. (17) Planning Director Andy Epple submitted the following. (1) Noted that the second of the hearings scheduled on the unified development ordinance will be held tomorrow night. (2)Announced that Ed McMahon will be speaking in Livingston on August 17. (18) The Planning Director noted that about six weeks ago, the Commission heard an informal application from Jerry Locati for a large development that involves relocation of an existing casino. Mayor Kirchhoff was absent from that meeting, and the remaining four Commissioners were split on whether to pursue a zone code amendment to allow that to occur. Mayor Kirchhoff stated he is favorable to the overall plan and does not have a problem with relocating the existing casino in conjunction with a large development held in single ownership. Commissioner Brown voiced his objection to writing the code for one person. (19) Staff Attorney Day-Moore noted that under the zoning planned unit development, it states groundwater measurements must be taken May 15 through September 15. (20) Ms. Erin Everett, reporter for the Bozeman Daily Chronicle announced this is her last meeting; she has accepted another assignment upon return from her honeymoon. (21) Commissioner Brown announced that he met with representatives from the Library Board of Trustees and had an opportunity to review the detailed financial statement. (22) Commissioner Cetraro noted he took pictures of the library at Salt Lake City and will bring them in for the Commissioners to see. (23) Mayor Kirchhoff requested that the Clerk of the Commission advertise for the openings on the various advisory boards, including the Beautification Advisory Board, the Local Water Quality District and the Pedestrian/Traffic Safety Committee. (24) Commissioner Youngman noted the Historic Preservation Advisory Board has requested an additional position for a student and asked that this be placed on an agenda for discussion after Labor Day. (25) Mayor Kirchhoff asked if three Commissioners support using$500 from the monies budgeted for board requests to defray a portion of the costs of publishing the brochure for the senior citizens; three of the Commissioners indicated support for doing so. 08-11-03 BOZ. CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * _ * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 Z� 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 ,e��,,�� 8 �0 Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net c Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net August 27, 2003 XG &Associates 284 Frontier Drive Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Baxter Square PUD #Z-03184 At its August 11, 2003 meeting the Bozeman City Commission voted 4-0 to conditionally approve the Conditional Use Permit application for a Planned Unit Development for the unified development of 101-townhouses and two 8-plex multi-household units in association with the approval for Baxter Square Subdivision PUD. The project was approved for concurrent construction of buildings and the subdivision infrastructure as outlined for Planned Unit Developments in Section 18.50.030.D "Water and Sanitary Sewer System Requirements" in the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The project was also approved for relaxations from: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to. allow two 8- plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district; b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback; and g) Section 18.50.110.K"No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. The proposal was evaluated against the review criteria and requirements of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The Commission's decision was based on the fact that, with conditions, the proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and the Adopted Growth Policy. The decision of the City Commission is final. Seven copies of a final site plan, which shows how all conditions of approval and code provisions have been addressed, must be submitted to the Planning & Community Development Department, within 6 months, by February 11, 2004. A written narrative explaining how all of the conditions of approval have been addressed must accompany the submittal. The conditions for approval are as follows: planning -zoning • subdivision review 9 annexation -historic preservation housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a. registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in Page 2 r landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g"Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.1101.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall riot exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d "Open Space Maintenance Plan," requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city, the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines, including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers, with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2 "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements". The City of Page 3 Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. . Please call me if you have any questions regarding the conditions, code provisions, or the final site plan approval process. Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner - JM/jm cc: Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Page:4! CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS, OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BAXTER SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAXTER LANE WEST OF THE THOMAS DRIVE AND BAXTER LANE INTERSECTION,BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS,the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified architectural and landscape plan for 101 townhouse units and 2 multi-household buildings with the relaxation of Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district, Section 18.20.030"Lot Area and Width"to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet,Section 18.50.060.A"Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback and Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as E%2 W%2 SE'/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T IS, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following nineteen(19) conditions and code provisions: Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. Baxter Square Zoning RUD #Z703132 PAGE.I 0 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6. The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12)months;however,the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine(9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan, building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience,or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops,an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces",parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall Baxter Square Zoning PUD #Z-03132 PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d"Open Space Maintenance Plan,"requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city,the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines,including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers,with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2"Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements".The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN, that the above-noted nineteen(19) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as a commercial Planned Unit Development. DATED THIS DAY OF , 20 Baxter S uare Zonin PUD .#Z-03.132 PAGE 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDOWNER Ami Grant Baxter Square, L.L.C. STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Ami Grant, known to me to be the of Baxter Square, L.L.C., the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana My Commission Expires LANDOWNER Evert Wierda STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared Evert Wierda,known to be the persons whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana My Commission Expires Baxter S uare.Zoniii .P.UD #Z703132. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDOWNER Steve Nicoll Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C. STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Steve Nicoll, known to me to be the of Buffalo Land Management,L.L.C.,the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana My Commission Expires Baxter S uare Zonis PUD,#Z-03.132. ; PAGE 5 CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FILE NO. Z-03132 BAXTER SQUARE CUP/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #Z-03132. A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR A ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 101 TOWNHOUSE UNITS, TWO 8-PLEX APARTMENT BUILDINGS AND ONE EXISTING SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENCE WITH REQUESTED RELAXATIONS FROM THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING ORDINANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE O F B AXTER L ANE W EST OF THE BAXTER LANE AND THOMAS DRIVE INTERSECTION AND ZONED "R-3" (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT). REPRESENTED: C&H ENGINEERING& SURVEYING, INC. 205 EDELWEISS DRIVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 JKG & ASSOCIATES 28#FRONTIER DRIVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 OWNERS: BUFFALO LAND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. 12720 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN, MT 59741 EVERT WIERDA 13707 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN, MT 59741 BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 317 SANDERS AVENUE BOZEMAN,MT 59718 DATE/TIME: BEFORE THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMSSION ON MONDAY, AUGUST 11,20039 AT 7:00 P.M.,IN THE COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: JAMI MORRIS, ASSISTANT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 1 t • • Proiect Location: The subject property is described as E%2 W%2 SE'/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. Please refer to the vicinity map provided. — B-2 FT-� ,--I Sub'ed Property BP R 3 R R-1 N R-3 Recommended Conditions of Approval: The Bozeman Development Review Committee (D.R.C.) and the Design Review Board (D.R.B.) have reviewed the Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development against the criteria set forth in Section 18.52, 18.53 and Section 18.54 of the Zoning Ordinance. Some of the issues have been identified in the subdivision staff report and are not duplicated in this staff report. Based on the evaluation of said criteria and findings by the Planning Staff, staff recommends the following conditions of approval and code provisions to the City Commission: Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 2 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions,corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12)months;however,the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine(9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan,building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience,or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 3 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.1 10.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops,an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.1101.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces",parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed"Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110RI.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d"Open Space Maintenance Plan,"requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city,the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines,including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers,with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2"Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements".The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 4 a Proposal: The Zoning Planned Unit Development application proposes to construct 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit apartment buildings with requested relaxations and proposed improvements. The property is being concurrently reviewed for the subdivision of the property. The development is required to provide 0.03 acres of dedicated parkland per dwelling unit and 30% open space. The open space requirement includes parkland and stream setbacks. The parkland required equates to approximately 3.5 acres and the open space would be 3.1 acres. The site plan indicates a soccer field in the middle of the subdivision and additional parkland being provided adjacent to the 50-foot stream setback. If additional area cannot be provided to meet the total parkland dedication then cash-in-lieu of parkland must be paid. A Class I trail,as noted in the Transportation Plan,is required adjacent to Cattail Creek. The applicant has also depicted benches and associated landscaping for the stream setback and park facilities. The subdivision will be developed primarily with townhouse clusters ranging from two to four units per cluster. However, one of the proposed relaxations is for the allowance for two apartment-style condominium buildings. The"R-3"zoning district permits up to a four-plex or up to a five-unit townhouse cluster. The apartment buildings would provide eight dwelling units per building. The developer is attempting to get the dwelling units certified as affordable housing units. If the units are certified as affordable then the parking requirement for the apartment buildings will be reduced by one space per unit. The subdivision is required to have 218 off-street parking spaces with 117 additional on-street parking spaces permitted. The wider public streets will have parking on both sides and the narrower private streets will provide parking on one side of the street. The development will also have parking adjacent to the public park in the center of the subdivision. Staff does not support all of the requested relaxations from the zoning ordinance. Planning does not support the reduction in drive aisle width and any of the deviations that would reduce the parking stall length. Although the applicant has requested a relaxation to the drive aisle width for the 8-plex buildings it may not be required if half of the off-street parking can be eliminated due to the exception in the code for parking related to affordable housing complexes. If this is the case then the drive aisle reduction will not be necessary. Staff cannot support the relaxation of the stall length for a couple of driveways within the corner side yard setback and front yard setback because of the potential for vehicles to overhang the sidewalk and hinder pedestrian movements. Only compact vehicles would be able to park in the shortened driveways. The Planned Unit Development has been advertised with the following requested relaxations from the Zoning Ordinance in exchange for a unified development and landscape plan. The developers have indicated they may be able to redesign some of the units to address Staff s concerns, which may no longer necessitate the requirement for all of the originally requested relaxations. a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses"to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district. b) )j Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lof area less than 3,000 square feet. Section 18.20.050"Yards"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty-foot front yard setback. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 5 d) Section 18.50.060.A"Permitted Encroachments Into Yards"to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback. Section 18.50.060.0"Special Yard Setbacks"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback. Section 18.50.1103 "Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet. g) Section 18.50.110.K"No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards"to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. Adiacent Land Uses and Zoning: The adjacent land uses and zoning designations in the immediate area of the proposed development are as follows: NORTH: "R-S"—Single Household Residence on unincorporated land. SOUTH: "R-3" —Vacant EAST: "R-S"—Single Household Residence with a janitorial service as a home occupation WEST: "R-S" —Single Household Residence on unincorporated land. . r i � 1 1,3 � cY;� '.nay' s -� -J E;P ry C A� `L r a r= � r Staff Findings: The City of Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the Planned Unit Development application against Sections 18.52, 18.53 and 18.54 of the Zoning Ordinance, and offers the following review comments. The findings outlined in this report include comments and recommended conditions provided by the Development Review Committee (D.R.C.). Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 6 Section 18.52 "Site Plan Review Criteria" Site plan review criteria from section 18.52.030.17 that are not discussed elsewhere follows: A. CONFORMANCE WITHT THE CITY'S ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY. • The property is designated Residential. The Residential land use designation denotes areas where the primary activity is urban density living quarters. • One of the implementing zoning districts in areas designated Residential is"R-3"Residential Medium Density District. The intent of the R-3 district is to provide for the development of one to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city. • Townhouse clusters up to five units per cluster is a permitted principal use in the "R-3" district. Apartment buildings over four dwelling units require approval as a planned unit development. B. CONFORMANCE TO THIS TITLE, I NCLUDING T HE C ESSATION O F A NY CURRENT VIOLATIONS. • Certain code/policy requirements and recommended conditions will ensure compliance with the code.Elements that do not meet code have been noted as conditions of approval and code provisions. C. CONFORMANCE WITH ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS,ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS. • The intent of Section 18.54"Planned Unit Development"is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Per Section 18.54.030.A "a planned unit development may be applied to any development having one or more principle uses or structures on a single parcel of real property or contiguous parcels of real property",as long as the use is consistent with the Bozeman Growth Policy. • The site plan has been reviewed against Sections 18.50, 18.52, 18.53 and 18.54 and staff has found the application in general compliance with the requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Any areas not addressed in the applicant's proposal have been identified as code provisions that shall be addressed on the Final Site Plan. D. RELATIONSHIP OF SITE PLAN ELEMENTS TO CONDITIONS BOTH ON AND OFF THE PROPERTY. • The property is currently developed with a single household residence on the southwest corner of the property. The proposal requests the addition of 101 townhouse units and two, 8-plex condominiums. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 7 • The adjacent properties to the north and northeast have not been incorporated into the city limits. The area is primarily single household residences on parcels ranging from one acre to ten acres in size. • Access to the property will be provided primarily from Baxter Lane,which is identified as a minor arterial street. A local street will be constructed through the subdivision to Thomas Drive/North 27th Avenue, a collector street, in order to provide secondary access. • All lots are required to be platted outside the 50-foot watercourse setback. Landscaping within the setback must follow the guidelines outlined in Section 18.50.060.D.2.g"Setback Planting". E. THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL ON THE EXISTING AND ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONDITIONS. • According to the Traffic Impact Study each single household unit will generate approximately 9.57 average weekday trip ends and the apartment buildings will generate approximately 5.86 average weekday trip ends per unit. This equates to a total of 1,070 weekday trip ends. • The traffic study estimates that the Baxter Meadows development at full buildout will create as many as 23,000 new trips per day. The study concludes that the expected impacts of Baxter Square, at full build out of both Baxter Square and Baxter Meadows, will only account for 12% of the traffic on Baxter Lane. • According to the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update, Baxter Lane is designated as a minor arterial that is expected to support 5,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day and 271h Avenue is designated as a collector street, which will eventually be designed to support 2,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day. • Three parking spaces per two or three bedroom dwelling unit is required. Based on these figures 218 off street parking spaces must be provided and 117 parking spaces must be provided within the subdivision. The private streets have parking on one side of the road and the pubic streets depict parking on both sides of the right of way. • Parking for affordable housing units can be reduced to two spaces per unit,with half of the spaces being provided off-street, based on a new provision in the zoning ordinance. This may alleviate the need for a relaxation of the drive aisle if the applicant is able to eliminate the extra row of parking depicted on the 8-plex site plan. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 8 0 F. THE CONSISTENCY OF THE PROPOSAL WITH RESPECT TO LAND USE REQUIREMENTS. • 6.6.1 Objective 6.Support infill development which respects the context of the existing development which surrounds it. 6.6.2 Objective 3.Support and encourage compatible infill development to avoid sprawl and unnecessary public expense.4.9.1 Objective 6. Develop infill within the existing are of the City rather than developing land requiring expansion of the City's area. The east tract, originally called the Syme-Darvis Annexation, was formally annexed at the end of 2002. The west tract was preliminarily approved for annexation as the D.A.K. Annexation in 2002 but the City Commission has not yet formally adopted the annexation agreement. The proposal for the construction of 117 new dwelling units on the combined parcels will offer high-density urban infill development within the city limits. T he existing single household residences located to the north and northeast of the subject property,outside of the city limits, are mostly on one-acre tracts. The average density of the new subdivision is 11 units per net acre compared to the average one dwelling unit per acre of the neighboring properties. The Bozeman Growth Policy recommends an average of 12 units per acre for medium density zoning districts. The proposed development is higher in density than the neighboring properties but consistent with the densities contemplated for Cattail Creek to the north and future developments to the south. Ultimately,the development will be in harmony with the expected densities for "R-3" zoned properties that encourage urban density infill development. The city limits and city infrastructure extend further west to Baxter Meadows. Additional infrastructure will be required to be constructed in conjunction with the development proposal. G. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS. • Full access will be permitted from Baxter Lane and North 27t"Avenue. • The developers have obtained an easement to allow the construction of the local street across the adjacent county parcels. Aside from the primary north/south street and the east/west street to be constructed within a 60-foot right of way,the remaining streets will be designated as private streets and constructed within a 32-foot public street easement. • Boulevards will not be installed along the private streets. • A pedestrian/bike trail will be constructed along the east side of Cattail Creek as required in the Transportation Plan. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 9 H. BUILDING LOCATION AND HEIGHT. Maximum Allowable Depicted Building Height 38 feet 28 feet Building Length 120 feet 65-120 feet I. LANDSCAPING. • The landscape plan meets the required Landscape Performance Standards. • Additional landscaping is required in the form of zone plantings within the watercourse setback and the apartment building parking lots must be landscaped to meet the mandatory landscaping requirements. I LIGHTING. • The streetlight indicated in the site plan submittal conforms to our zoning standards as long as it is equipped with a cut off lens. K. PROVISIONS FOR UTILITIES. • One of the recommended conditions of approval associated with the subdivision would require the subdivider to install an irrigation well for the watering of residential yards,parks and open space areas. An irrigation well will eliminate the use of treated water for irrigation purposes and is also a cost saving measure for the residents of the development. • The 12" water main in Baxter Lane s hall b e e xtended t o t he w estern b oundary o f t he subdivision to conform to the City's Water Master Plan. The developer further proposes to extend the 8" sewer main located in the south end of Cattail Creek subdivision to the subdivision along Thomas Drive/North 27th Avenue. L. SITE SURFACE DRAINAGE. • Storm water detention ponds are noted for the subdivision to the north of Lot 91,on the west side of the park and along the west side of the trail. • The ponds located within the park cannot be calculated towards meeting the dedicated parkland requirements associated with the subdivision improvements. M. OPEN SPACE. • The Planned Unit Development review criteria require a minimum of 30% open space and under the subdivision review a total of 3% acres of dedicated parkland is required. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 10 • 30% o pens pace has been provided exclusive oft hey and setbacks and the parking lot landscaping but inclusive of the watercourse setback. As discussed in the subdivision staff report the parkland dedication has not been fulfilled. Approximately one acre of parkland must still be accounted for but additional open space is not required. • An open space maintenance plan must be submitted with the final site plan. • The site plan indicates the installation of benches along the trail. N. LOADING AND UNLOADING AREAS. • Not applicable. O. GRADING. • The property will be graded with the subdivision infrastructure to provide adequate drainage to storm water runoff ponds located on the north and west sides of the property. P. SIGNAGE. • A detail for the subdivision sign has been included with the site plan submittal materials. One subdivision identification sign per entrance is permitted under Section 18.65. Each sign cannot exceed sixteen square feet in area or five feet in height. Q. SCREENING. • Staff did not feel that adding screening between the existing and future development would encourage integration of the two neighborhoods. R. SETBACKS. • The"R-3"(Residential Medium Density District)lots have a twenty-foot front and rear yard setback and a five-foot side yard setback requirement. Corner lots with driveways within the corner side yard have a twenty-foot corner side yard setback and a fifteen-foot corner side yard setback if no driveway is present. The property has an additional fifty-foot stream setback adjacent to Cattail Creek. The trail amenities are permitted within the setback as depicted. • The applicant has requested reductions in the setbacks for a few of the lots. Generally,when reviewing a subdivisionPUD we do not restrict the relaxations to just those lots encroaching into the setbacks. Therefore,the relaxations have been advertised and if approved would be permitted for all of the lots within the PUD. Planning Staff does not support the relaxation of the corner side yard setback. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 11 S. OVERLAY DISTRICT PROVISIONS. Not applicable. T. OTHER RELATED MATTERS,INCLUDING EXPRESSED PUBLIC OPINION. • No public comment has been received. Section 18.53 "City Commission Consideration and Findings" In approving a Conditional Use Permit application,the City Commission shall consider the criteria set forth in Section 18.53.030 of the Zoning Ordinance and find as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls,and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. The site is adequate in size to support the proposed uses. The applicant has requested a reduction in yard setbacks but the reduction is not necessary for all of the townhouse clusters. Sufficient parking is depicted on the site plan. The two affordable housing buildings will qualify for a reduction in parking if they can meet the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.110 "Parking Requirements". Staff is concerned with the possible reduction of any of the front yard or corner side yard setbacks in relation to the inadequate stall length that would be provided if approved. If permitted as proposed the bumpers of vehicles will overhang the sidewalk and interfere with pedestrian movements. 2. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. City staff including the fire department believes the streets will be adequate in width if constructed to a minimum width of 28 feet from face of curb to face of curb. This will leave adequate space for two lanes of traffic and space for parking on one side of the street. The Fire Department requires a minimum of 20 feet in width for fire trucks and our local street design allows for on street parking being as narrow as 7 feet. However, the Engineering Department could not support less than 8 feet for on street parking due to the presence of a curbwalk and the lack of a boulevard. The conditions of approval will require improvements to Baxter Lane and Thomas Drive/North 27`" Avenue to bring them up to the standards outlined in the Transportation Plan. 3. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect upon the abutting property. There is no question that the proposal is dissimilar to the existing character of the neighborhood. However, the conditions of approval should ensure that the project has minimal impact on adjacent properties. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 12 4. That the proposed use shall be in conformance with the adopted Growth Policy. The proposal is in conformance with the adopted Growth Policy as discussed in the objectives outlined earlier in the staff report 5. That the conditional use has complied with all conditions stipulated in Chapter 18.50. Section 18.50 establishes general development standards that are intended and designed to assure compatibility of uses;to prevent urban blight,deterioration and decay;and to enhance the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the residents living within the zoning jurisdiction of the City of Bozeman. The proposal satisfies most of the requirements of Section 18.50,"General Building and Development Standards"of the Zoning Ordinance,the Code Provisions listed with the Conditions of Approval will need to be addressed prior to Final Site Plan approval. 6. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a)Regulation of use; b)Special yards,spaces and buffers; c)Special fences, solid fences,and walls;d)Surfacing of parking areas; e)Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds;f)Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g)Regulation of signs; h)Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i) Regulation of noise, vibrations, odors; j) Regulation of hours for certain activities;k)Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed;1)Duration of use; m) Requiring the dedication of access rights; n) Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner. On July 8, 2003, the DRC voted 5 to 0 to forward a favorable recommendation based on compliance with the conditions and code provisions outlined by Staff that identified any of the potential concerns outlined in the Conditional Use Permit criteria. On July 8, 2003 the DRB met to discuss the development proposal. Without a quorum they were unable to forward conditions of approval or a formal recommendation. The board did voice concerns over the possible lack of sufficient parking and the density of the project. The City Commission may conclude that there are other conditions necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Section 18.54 "Planned Unit Development Criteria" In approving a Planned Unit Development,the City Commission is charged with finding that criteria outlined in Section 18.54.100 are adequately addressed and may consider any conditions deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. Planning staff has evaluated the application against the applicable Planned Unit Development review criteria and offers the following summary review comments below. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 13 All Development 1. Is the development compatible with,and sensitive to,the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods relative to architectural design,building bulk and height, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the site and visual integrity? The proposal is for mixed housing types at higher urban densities as expected in the 44R-3" zoning designation. Not only does the proposal meet the objectives of the zoning designation it also meets the goals and objectives of the adopted Growth Policy by providing mixed housing types (2-5 unit townhouse clusters and two apartment buildings) and affordable housing units. The only buildings not consistent with the zoning are the 8-plex condominiums,which the property owners are attempting to get certified as affordable units through HRDC. The design of the townhouse buildings also helps provide more character and break up the fagade by incorporating different colors and materials for each unit to avoid the doldrums of the typical multi-unit townhouse structure. The Commission may want to consider moving the two apartment style buildings into the interior of the subdivision and reducing the overall number of dwelling units adjacent to the existing single household residences. 2. Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply,sanitary supply,fire protection, flood hazard areas, telephone, cable television, trails/walks/bike ways, irrigation companies, electricity, natural gas, storm drainage, streets? The developers have requested concurrent construction of the buildings and the infrastructure. The proposal will have to comply with the requirements outlined for concurrent construction. Conditions of approval have been recommended to address the infrastructure, irrigation, storm drainage and the trail corridor. 3. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? The application proposes to preserve the existing vegetation adjacent to the creek. Otherwise the only existing mature vegetation is in association with the existing single household residence. 4. Have special precautions been taken to preserve existing wildlife habitats, natural wildlife food services, or existing places, or are these areas being preserved? Cattail Creek will not be altered and existing mature vegetation will be preserved within the stream setback. Therefore, wildlife habitat will be maintained especially for birds, small mammals and aquatic life. 'Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 14 5. If the proposed project is located within a locally designated historical district or includes a locally designated landmark structure,is the project in conformance with the city's Historic Preservation Ordinance? Not applicable. 6. Is the exterior lighting, except for warning, emergency or traffic signals, installed in such a manner that the light source is obscured to prevent excessive glare on public streets and walkways or into any residential area? The proposed streetlight that will be installed at road intersections and trail/road intersections complies with the zoning requirements as long as the lens is flush with the fixture. The covenants will ensure general compliance with the zoning ordinance and the desire to maintain a dark sky policy even in a residential subdivision. 7. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) arranged on the site so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community and neighborhood? The site plan has arranged the site plan elements in a manner that provides an integrated development proposal to meet the needs of the neighborhood. The plan gives consideration to producing an interesting streetscape and addressing the new requirements for a center in the subdivision. 8. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized, and cohesive planned unit development? The site plan has been designed with consideration given to the watercourse and functional open space. The dedicated road running north to south jogs slightly to the west where it aligns with one of the private streets. Although conceptually this seems odd it will serve to slow traffic on the wider streets with the T-intersection at the park. 9. Is the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g.,buildings,circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography; natural water bodies and watercourses; existing vegetation? The site plan is in harmony with the natural elements of the property. Each lot will maintain a 50-foot watercourse setback. Based on the Recreation&Parks Advisory comments for the subdivision, the only two lots adjacent to the open space area associated with the stream should be removed. Then the park could be expanded to meet the parkland minimums and would avoid the drawbacks associated with homes being constructed directly adjacent to open space amenities. There is also the possibility of the presence of wetlands on the northwest corner of the property. Fish, Wildlife & Parks has indicated that the head of a spring 1 ies w ithin t his a rea a nd that the vegetation associated with the spring provides significant habitat for birds and wildlife. As a condition of approval the applicant is required Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 15 to determine if the area is characterized by wetlands. If wetlands are present then the 50-foot watercourse setback applies and all lots must be created outside of the setback. 10. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement: t ransportation networks, selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources, etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? The continuing extension of the north/south trail identified in the transportation plan should encourage walking and bike riding. Upon completion of the trail it will extend from the Bozeman Ponds to as far north as the intersection of Hulbert Road and Fowler Lane. 11. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? The site plan has been arranged with all but two buildings to be across the street from the park and open space areas. This should maximize the privacy of the residents. Although elimination of the two lots adjacent to the open space area would be further beneficial and allow the expansion of the park. Expansion of the parkland could be designed in a fashion that would still maintain an adequate buffer between the existing residence and the public park. 12. Open space. Sufficient open space has been provided through the park amenities associated with the subdivision and the extra buffer to the linear park. 13. Is the active recreational area suitably located and accessible to the residential units it is intended to serve and is adequate screening provided to ensure privacy and quiet for neighboring residential uses? The trail runs from Baxter Lane to the intersection with the park that will provide an area for walking and bike riding. The master plan for the park,if approved by the City Commission, is to construct a small playground and a soccer field. 14. Is the pedestrian circulation system designed to assure that pedestrians can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area? Sidewalks will be constructed adjacent to all of the roads. The private streets will not be constructed with boulevards but will provide 5-foot wide curbwalks. The block lengths do not exceed the recommended lengths in the subdivision regulations so additional connections in the middle of the blocks were not recommended with the subdivision improvements. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 16 15. Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? The street layout does take into consideration the existing and future circulation patterns. The supplemental sheet provided by C&H Engineering identifies the major street network of adjacent developments. 16. Does the pedestrian circulation system incorporate design features to enhance convenience, safety and amenity across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to, paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lighting? The applicant has discussed the option for a stop sign and pedestrian crosswalk adjacent to the park. The Engineering Department will have to evaluate whether stop signs are required. 17. Does the pedestrian and bicycle trail system adequately connect to the systems in adjacent developments? As previously stated the trail system will eventually connect as far south as the Bozeman Ponds and as far north as Hulbert Road. 18. Does the landscape plan enhance the appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian areas which contribute to their usage and visual appearance? The landscape plan for the trail corridor and the park will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood. However, the landscape plan for the streets only depicts street trees being constructed within the boulevards. The private streets that lack boulevards note that the lot owners will provide landscaping within the front yards to enhance the streetscape. Planning Staff has suggested that street trees be installed within the front yards if boulevards are not present. 19. Does the landscaping plan enhance the building(s)? The covenants and design guidelines recorded for the PUD will require landscaped yards. Additional landscaping will also be required for the apartment buildings in order to meet the mandatory landscaping requirements. 20, If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area,have provisions been made in the site plan to avoid interfering with public access to that area? No parkland currently exists adjacent to the proposed development. The regional will be located to the west in Baxter Meadows and Rose Park lies to the southeast on Oak Street. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 17 Residential 1. On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project (calculated for residential portion of the site only), consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the Bozeman Growth Policy? The adopted Growth Policy recommends an average of 12 units per acre for Medium Density zoned properties. The proposal is for an average of 11 units per acre. 2. Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g., private yards, patios and balconies, etc.) for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light sun,ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Adequate yard spaces will exist for the benefit of the residents. All of the units will maintain a 20-foot rear yard setback. Only a few of the townhouses actually depict the patio area encroaching more than the 5 feet permitted within the rear yard setback. In addition, the condominiums have been designed in a horseshoe configuration in order to provide a courtyard area for the residents to use for active recreation. 3. Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? The development will have a 2.2 acre park in the center of the subdivision, a linear park and trail on the northwest portion of the property and individual outdoor spaces tied to each privately owned yard. 4. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus, does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? The project does not request a density bonus but does provide a mixture of housing types and affordable housing units. 5. Is the project within two thousand feet of an existing or approved neighborhood service center, public school, day care center, major employment center, or public neighborhood or community park? The project is within two thousand feet of Gallatin Center, which is identified in the adopted Growth Policy as a regional center. The property is within 2,500 feet of Bridger Peaks Town Center and 2,700 feet of the regional park. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 18 6. Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities? The proposal will enhance the natural environment by maintaining the existing stream corridor and providing outdoor amenities for the residents and the public. The bike trail will help conserve energy by encouraging people to utilize the future trails and bike lanes. 7. If the project contains limited commercial developments as defined above, is the project located at the intersection of arterial streets, or arterial and collector streets. Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 8. If limited commercial development as defined above is proposed within the project, is less than twenty percent of the gross area of the PUD designated to be used for offices or neighborhood service activities not ordinarily allowed in the particular residential zoning district? Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 9. If neighborhood service activities are proposed within the project, is a market analysis provided demonstrating that less than fifty percent of the market required to support proposed neighborhood service activities is located outside the immediate area of the PUD and are the neighborhood services of a nature that does not require drive-in facilities or justification for through traffic? Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 10. If the project contains limited commercial developments as defined above, is the project located at the intersection of arterial streets, or arterial and collector streets. Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 11. If the project contains limited commercial development as defined above, has the project been sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood and have the commercial activities been developed at a scale compatible with residential development? Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 12. Does the overall PUD recognize and, to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? The existing neighborhood can be characterized primarily by ranch style single household residences on at least one acre with some homes on lots as large as ten acres. The City of Bozeman has very few examples of residential developments that would mimic the existing densities especially on a property that was approved by the Commission for"R-3"zoning. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 19 Developments such as Sundance Springs on the south end of town do not necessarily promote the objectives of the adopted Growth Policy which touts the need for mixed housing types, affordable housing and smaller lots that discourage sprawl. Conclusion/Recommendation: The Bozeman Development Review Committee(D.R.C.)and Design Review Board(D.R.B.) have reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, and recommend to the City Commission conditional approval of said application with conditions and code provisions outlined at the beginning of the staff report. The Planning Staff has identified various code provisions that are not currently met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. BECAUSE THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT, THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION. THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION MAY BE APPEALED BY AN AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 18.58 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal for a Planned Unit Development Attachment A-Existing &Proposed Major Street Network Attachment B- Design Review Board Staff Report Attachment C- Design Review Board Minutes Mailed To: Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 JKG & Associates, 284 Frontier Drive, Bozeman,.MT 59718 Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 20 ►DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT fflAXTER SQUARE CUP/PUD ZONING FILE NO. Z-03132 i ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #Z-03132. THROUGH THE ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 101 TOWNHOUSE UNITS, TWO 8-PLEX APARTMENT BUILDINGS AND ONE EXISTING SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENCE WITH REQUESTED RELAXATIONS FROM THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING ORDINANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAXTER LANE WEST OF THE BAXTER LANE AND THOMAS DRIVE INTERSECTION AND ZONED "R-3" (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT). REPRESENTED: C&H ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. 205 EDELWEISS DRIVE BOZEMAN,MT 59718 JKG & ASSOCIATES 285 FRONTIER DRIVE BOZEMAN,MT 59718 OWNERS: BUFFALO LAND MANAGEMENT,L.L.C. 12720 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN,MT 59741 EVERT WIERDA 13707 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN, MT 59741 BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 317 SANDERS AVENUE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2003, AT 3:30 P.M., IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, 20 EAST OLIVE STREET,BOZEMAN,MONTANA REPORT BY: JAMI MORRIS ASSISTANT PLANNER RECOMMEND: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Baxter Square CUP/PUD 1 T • 1. Project Description: The subject property is described as E%2 W% SE'/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. Please refer to the vicinity map provided. B-2 Sub�ec# Property BP R3 � R-1 R-3 The Zoning Planned Unit Development application proposes to construct 101 townhouse units and two apartment buildings with requested relaxations and proposed improvements. The property is being concurrently reviewed for the subdivision of the property. The development is required to provide 0.03 acres of dedicated parkland per dwelling unit and 30% open space. The open space requirement includes parkland and stream setbacks. The parkland required equates to approximately 3.5 acres and the open space would be 3.1 acres. The site plan indicates a soccer field in the middle of the subdivision and additional parkland being provided adjacent to the 50- foot stream setback. If additional area cannot be provided to meet the total parkland dedication then cash-in-lieu of parkland must be paid. A Class I trail, as noted in the Transportation Plan, is required adjacent to Cattail Creek. The applicant has also depicted benches and associated landscaping for the stream setback and park facilities. The subdivision will be developed primarily with townhouse clusters ranging from two to four units per cluster. However, one of the proposed relaxations is for the allowance for two apartment-style condominium buildings. The "R-3" zoning district permits up to a fourplex or up to a five-unit townhouse cluster. The apartment buildings would provide eight dwelling units per building. The developer is attempting to get the dwelling units certified as affordable housing units. If the units are certified as affordable then the parking requirement for the apartment buildings will be reduced by one space per unit. The subdivision is required to have 218 off-street parking spaces with 117 additional on-street parking spaces permitted. The wider public streets will have parking on both sides and the narrower private streets will provide parking on one side of the street. The development will also have parking adjacent to the public park in the center of the subdivision. Baxter Square CUP/PUD 2 Staff does not support all of the requested relaxations from the zoning ordinance. Planning does not support the reduction in drive aisle width and any of the deviations that would reduce the parking stall length. Although the applicant has requested a relaxation to the drive aisle width for the 8-plex buildings it may not be required if half of the off-street parking can be eliminated due to the exception in the code for parking related to affordable housing complexes. If this is the case then the drive aisle reduction will not be necessary. Staff cannot support the relaxation of the stall length for a couple of driveways within the corner side yard setback and front yard setback because of the potential for vehicles to overhang the sidewalk and hinder pedestrian movements. Only compact vehicles would be able to park in the shortened driveways. Section 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" requires a recommendation from the Design Review Board either for approval, conditional approval or denial of the preliminary plan to the City Commission. 2. List of Deviations: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R- 3"zoning district. b) b) S ection 18.20.030 "Lot A rea a nd W idth"t o allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet. c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty-foot front yard setback. d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback. e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback. f) Section 18.50.110.11 "Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet. g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. 3. Architectural Review: The D esign R eview B oard r eviewed t he C oncept P Ian a t i is F ebruary 2 5, 2 003 public meeting and made the following comments: a) Aggregation of the driveways would create wider yard spaces and allow for more on- street parking. b) Landscaped boulevards (sod and street trees) should be provided along all sidewalks. Baxter Square CUP/PUD 3 c) The two spur trails on the east half of the property could be eliminated. d) So many driveways are not aesthetically pleasing. Alleys would be preferable. e) Longer driveways should be considered to minimize the stacking of vehicles into the right-of-way and blocking pedestrian use of the sidewalks. f) May need to look at widening the streets and narrowing the lots to allow for more on- street parking. g) The trail system should be located to provide a future link to the regional park. 4. Administrative Design Review Comments: The comments received have been identified as recommended conditions of approval. 5. Public Comment: No written comment has been received to date. 6. Staff Conclusion: The intent of Section 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design o f development projects within the city. The applicant is proposing deviations from the city's standards through the Planned Unit Development process and therefore must demonstrate a plan that will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced under the existing standards. Setbacks- The "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) lots have a twenty-foot front and r ear y and s etback a nd a five-foot side yard setback requirement. Corner lots with driveways within the corner side yard have a twenty-foot corner side yard setback and a fifteen-foot corner side yard setback if no driveway is present. The property has an additional fifty-foot stream setback adjacent to Cattail Creek. The trail amenities are permitted within the setback as depicted. The applicant has requested reductions in the setbacks for a few of the lots. Generally, when reviewing a subdivision PUD we do not restrict the relaxations to just those lots encroaching into the setbacks. Therefore, the relaxations have been advertised and if approved would be permitted for all of the lots within the PUD. Parking- Three parking spaces per two or three bedroom dwelling unit is required. All of the units have been depicted as either two or three bedroom. Out of the three spaces, required per unit, two of the spaces must be provided off the street. Based on these figures 218 off Baxter Square CUP/PUD 4 street parking spaces must be provided and 117 parking spaces must be provided within the subdivision. All of the townhouse units have single car garages. Therefore, they are permitted stacking of parking spaces with one space counted inside the garage and one space counted in the driveway. The plans depict numerous parking spaces on the street. The private streets have parking on one side of the road and the pubic streets depict parking on both sides of the right of way. A parallel space on the street must be twenty-four feet in length and outside of the street vision triangle in order to fulfill the parking requirement. Parking for affordable housing units can be reduced to two spaces per unit, with half of the spaces being provided off-street, based on a new provision in the zoning ordinance. This may alleviate the need for a relaxation of the drive aisle if the applicant is able to eliminate the extra row of parking depicted on the 8-plex site plan. Open Space- Section 18.54.100.E.1.12 "Open Space" requires a minimum of 30% open space exclusive o f y and s etbacks a nd r equired p arking 1 of 1 andscaping b e p rovided for residential projects. Three and a half acres of parkland must be provided and three acres of open space must be set-aside for the benefit of the residences. Detention and retentions ponds are permitted within dedicated parkland but they do not count towards the parkland dedication and they must be incorporated as a design feature. Staff recommends that the ponds be constructed in a more organic shape and incorporate landscaping. The subdivision meets the 3-acre open space requirement with the stream setback, adjacent parkland and the soccer field. Building Height & Footprint- Maximum Allowable Depicted Building Height 38 feet 28 feet Building Footprint 120 ft. length 65-120 ft. length The applicant is requesting a reduction of the lot area requirement in the "R-3" district. The minimum average lot area for a townhouse cluster is 3,000 square feet. The relaxation would be for ten of the thirty-three townhouse clusters with the smallest at 2,630 square feet. Landscape & Buffering- The applicant proposes to preserve a large majority of the existing mature vegetation especially adjacent to Cattail Creek. The landscape plan must also include Zone 1 watercourse plantings within fifteen to thirty feet of the high water mark. A mix of new and existing trees spaced 25-35 feet apart and shrubs planted throughout 5-15 feet apart. Baxter Square CUP/PUD 5 Based on the above summary review, the Planning Office and Administrative Design Review staff recommend to the Design Review Board conditional approval of the Planned Unit Development application with the following conditions: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. NOTE: The Design Review Board and Development Review Committee will forward a formal recommendation to the City Commission on this matter who will in turn consider an action on this application on Monday,August 11, 2003. Attachments: Submittal for Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development Mailed To: Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road,Manhattan,MT 59741 Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 JKG&Associates, 285 Frontier Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 Baxter Square CUP/PUD 6 Mr. Muhlenfeld added that, architecturally, the buildings were of historical type and in keeping with the downtown area. He stated the accesses were from the boulevards and from private alleys. He stated this is the first of three proposed phases. He stated Mr. Hanson was concerned with the length of the fagade at the informal review, and the applicant had provided an elevation of the fagade depicting different heights of entrances and numbers of stairs leading up to them to lessen the impact of the length of it. Mr. Carpenter asked if there was on-street parking on both sides of the streets. Mr. Muhlenfeld stated there was parking access from the front and the rear. Chairperson Smith asked for clarification of what would be developed in the first phase. Mr. Delaney explained the phases of development, noting that the third phase of development was unknown as of yet. Mr. Carpenter stated he appreciated the in-fill in that location, the facades were better than those presented in the Informal review, and the retention ponds were better located in this proposal. Chairperson Smith stated she liked the project and was in favor of recommending approval of the application including Staff conditions and the requested deviations. B. Baxter Square MaSub PUD Prel. Plat#P-03020 (Morris) 5371 Baxter Lane * A Preliminary Plat Application to subdivide 18.12 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two eight-plex lots, and one single family lot with proposed relaxations from the subdivision regulations. Voss Bowman, Evert Wierda, Randy Visser, John Sinrud, Amy Grant, and Per Hjalmarsson joined the DRB. Assistant Planner Jami Morris presented the staff report, noting there was a possibility of the proposal being comprised partially of affordable housing units. She stated Staff s main concern was the request for relaxation for the driveways to be less than twenty feet long, which would cause vehicles parked on the pad in front of the garage to hang over the sidewalks. She noted the original comments made by the DRB during the conceptual plan review of the project had been addressed with the Preliminary Plat proposal. She stated Staff requested a materials board and color pallet be provided before final approval. Mr. Sinrud stated the west portion of the property had some single and some dual car garages and the east side proposed single car garages,back to back, with 2 spaces of on-street parking. He stated the units would be reduced in size to accommodate the required length of the driveways to eliminate the request to reduce the required driveway length. He stated the applicant had tried to make parking arrangements and accesses more user friendly per DRB comments from the Concept Plan review. He stated the plans were to include a functioning park. Chairperson Smith asked if the affordable housing designation would reduce the number of required parking spaces. Mr. Sinrud stated code does require fewer parking spaces for affordable City of Bozeman Design Review Board Notes—July 8,2003 2 housing. He stated the reduction in the number of parking spaces would allow more landscaping as a buffer zone between the condos and the eight-plexes. Planner Morris stated Staff s major concern was the drive aisle width. Mr. Carpenter stated he appreciated the effort the applicant made to address the DRB comments from the initial review and he wished them success in the affordable housing designation. He stated the code should be changed so that parking would not be reduced with affordable housing. He asked the width of the drive aisle. Planner Morris responded that the drive aisle was 26 feet wide. Chairperson Smith stated she had serious concerns regarding the amount of proposed parking. She stated the number of vehicles would not decrease with a designation of affordable housing. She stated she was concerned with vehicular circulation throughout the project and the density may be too much for the area; thus, causing the parking difficulties. She stated she was concerned that vehicles stacked on the driveway would overhang the sidewalks. Mr. Carpenter asked if time limits could be placed on some of the parking spots. Planner Morris stated it could be instituted in the covenants. Mr. Howe stated enforcement of a time limit would be difficult as the subdivision would have to enforce the parking restrictions. He added that many projects reviewed by the DRB did not address parking well. C. Stoneridge Business Park Ph. II B MaSP/COA#Z-03146 (Honatke) Southwest corner of the intersection of North 19t" Avenue and North 22nd Avenue * A Major Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of two, single-story, multi-tenant, 4,700 sq. ft. office buildings; one single-story, multi-tenant, 4,553 sq. ft. office building; and one two-story, 9,618 sq. ft. retail/office building with related site improvements. This project was done second per an arrangement between Urban Designer/Planner Honatke and Planner Morris. Jesse Sobrepena and Dave MacDonald joined the DRB. Urban Designer/Planner Candace Honatke presented the staff report, noting that lots 15 and 16 have met all parking and landscaping requirements, however; lot 14 is deficient in achieving the necessary 23 landscape points. She stated Staff was requiring a color pallet and elevations, and DRC voted to conditionally approve the project earlier in the day. Mr. MacDonald stated he wanted the project to be a known element in the community. He stated choosing the color was difficult and he made the decision to use the same colors as those on the existing buildings on lot 13. Mr. Howe stated the project looked good. Mr. Carpenter stated he supported the project with Staff conditions. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Notes-July 8,2003 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: �j O 3 PROJECT NAME: PREPARED BY: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner FIL -0 3 D?C) APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: 0 DRB MEMBERS PRESENT: � ❑ Carol Asleson IF Randy Carpenter ❑ Bill Hanson WaL * aznoff P-I&lvin Howe Smith Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: I Oa&" Ou-alid u-)/deu a r r UAA.C-V A AAL-J u) ,UJQ,c,�sb0 Week 3of DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: o PROJECT NAME: a Z Z410u PREPARED BY: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner VILE #: Z. — o APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: J DRC MEMBERS PRESENT: � r" � , Er , ProjeEv giee " �hn Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent a Neil Poulsen, Chief Bui ding Official �ave Skelton, Senior Planner [John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent Greg Megaard, Fire arshal Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: p pGC, 4 4 4-U k= 8441,liLlQ A ,QOQ-11d6e AdO Approve enieds�to Z. 802� CITY OF BOZEMAN 9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 s 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 8 o��e Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner Date: July 8, 2003 -Final Week Review Subject: Baxter Square CUP/PUD #Z-03132, Baxter Lane Staff has found the Conditional Use Permit application for the establishment of a unified development plan for 101 townhouse units, two 8-plex apartment buildings and one existing single household residence, with conditions and code provisions, aside from the requested relaxations, complies with the requirements of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and should not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. The applicant has requested the following relaxations of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex-apartment buildings in the "R-3"zoning district. b) b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width"to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet. c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty-foot front yard setback. d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty-foot rear yard setback. e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen-foot corner side yard setback. f) Section 18.50.110.B "Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet. g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. Planning Staff is unable to forward a favorable recommendation regarding the relaxation of the front yard setback, corner side yard setback and the drive aisle width. Reductions of the setbacks will likely lead to parked vehicles overhanging the sidewalk and the reduction of the drive aisle width has too much potential for generating vehicular conflicts within the parking lot. Standard Conditions of Approval: 1. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing 9 grant administration 9 neighborhood coordination 2. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 3. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 4. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 5. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 6. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 7. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 8. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 9. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. Page 2 10. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". l 1. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 12. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 13. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 14. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d "Open Space Maintenance Plan," requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city, the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 15. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines, including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers, with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2 "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements". The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 16. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Page 3 Week vZ of 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING REVIEW SIJEET DATE: --1 I o 3 PROJECT NAME: PREPARED BY: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner F #: a— APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: z D C MEMBERS PRESENT: e(r � , Project Engineer ❑ John Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent ❑Neil Poulsen, Chief Buil ing Official Wave Skelton, Senior Planner ❑ John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent ❑ Greg Megaard, Fire Marshal Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: rto COLLc.dC4 1 $ _ _ QAA c( Approved/Denied to Week of 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: (P I PROJECT NAME: Swajaxt P(&' V�L PREPARED BY: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner ALE #:!� aja-- APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Job DR,Q MEMBERS PRESENT: // , Project Engineer Rave hn Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent ❑ ell Poulsen, Chief B ilding Official Skelton, Senior Planner John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent ❑ Greg Megaard, Fire Marshal Others/Alternates: SUMMARY ICA 0 a o iF s'/Z .� A.L�JZ LaA 4ogo_n nntai69"Ln-44 n co-L '�Do A I�PC s ` iv,6*49-iia �%w -OLWmen I l U r Approved/Denied to AUG-05-2003 TUE 04;03 PM KELLER WILLIAM"' FAX. NO, 141IR5820005 P. 01 68/85/2003 15t49 06 51 AOZEMAN REC DEP7� PAGt eL I Dat January 18,2003 To: lad Morris ' + Depart =t of PlUM4 Ud COMMZity Dovelopmt FVDB Reat'eatioa aid Parks Advisory Board Subt ision Review Co=dttee Re: Meer Squaro &-'4v&I points: • Cattaail Creek c,*nWr is 0¢ stae►t trawl can an bctwem Harvest Creek to south and the CmtaI1 Crwk subdivWon to the wrth, A tmii along it NhDuW be .. im huied M' the pins. • T t park Ibcation is amelkw,wnh sown$rom two stets od In the ceder of the jd1kopownt • ugttwe getIty wise agahl5t cni�lieu of pariclauasi daiication,we would mend it this cue,bath because of the r�saaoab�y sized atad fib'1peated nd and becauw of tbo proposed low-i�me housing.We would consi is rasbr- for tie an amens prklend rcgwm=t if the developer would ruck the cash- wwuat god if the total amount oaa be used for park and treat develop t in aer Square subiivis ion.Installation of korove=nts should be done by the do mlopse. • motllod for dftm1m4v the each-m4icu amuntt must mde emr. Bad plan muA bc presented to the board before Eaml approval, for the y to comet. 01 «` arr� ID EXISTING AND PROPOSED MAJOR STREE N TWORK SURROUNDING BAX TER SQUARE SUB /Vl ON N iv FUTURE DE DMAN'S GULCH w DEDICATED 0' RIGHT'OF WAY Z OR FU Q N N W= J , co w w > Z Scale: 1 "=300' Q > w o Q 2 rn T LL Z F i.:_. BAXTER LANE ' w Z w w Z > Q Q J = > N Q 0 w w H � H w 0 U. OAK STREET 9 �I a • 2 2003 ED WG NEERIN A DSVEYING, INC. DEF1RTMENT OF PLANNING •UYV Engineering •Struct urad Engineering •Lan Surve 1Nn,'•I,i;,+;11I;1TY DEVELOPMENl 205 Edelweiss Drive Bozeman,Montana 5018 ' (406)587-1115•Fax:(406)57-9768•infokhengineers.c m Sheet 1 Of 1 # 2395(D) k Building Clusters • • Cluster Lot Area(ft2) Cluster Area Excluding Building %Building Driveway % Driveway Lots per Average Liveable Private Street Easement Area(ft2) Coverage Area(ft2) Cluster Lot Size Space(ft2) FAR Cluster 1 13,545 13,545 4,397 32.5% 1,215 9.0% 4 3,386 6,736 0.50 Cluster 2 11,970 11,970 4,407 36.8% 1,175 9.8% 4 2,993 6,736 0.56 Cluster 3 12,349 12,349 4,401 35.6% 1,197 9.7% 4 3,087 6,736 0.55 Cluster4 19,363 16,921 4,569 27.0% 1,590 9.4% 4 4,230 4,874 0.29 Cluster 5 8,307 7,029 2,210 31.4% 603 8.6% 2 3,515 3,368 0.48 Cluster 6 13,336 9,502 3,297 34.7% 896 9.4% 3 3,167 5,052 0.53 Cluster 7 6,368 6,368 2,207 34.7% 559 8.8% 2 3,184 3,368 0.53 Cluster 8 10,717 9,025 3,296 36.5% 868 9.6% 3 3,008 5,052 0.56 Cluster 9 12,388 10,026 3,294 32.9% 1,036 10.3% 3 3,342 5,052 0.50 Cluster 10 17,051 14,413 3,,300 22.9% 4,396 30.5% 1 14,413 6,872 0.48 Cluster 11 14,384 12,152 4,401 36.2% 1,261 10.4% 4 3,038 6,736 0.55 Cluster 12 13,224 11,172 4,407 39.4% 1,261 11.3% 4 2,793 6,736 0.60 Cluster 13 13,224 11,172 4,407 39.4% 1,261 11.3% 4 2,793 6,736 0.60 Cluster 14 16,798 14,182 3,300 23.3% 4,720 33.3% 1 14,182 6,872 0.48 Cluster 15 17,015 10,544 4,897 46.4% 1,064 10.1% 3 3,515 4,472 0.42 Cluster 16 16,477 10,427 3,800 36.4% 1,197 11.5% 3 3,476 4,472 0.43 Cluster 17 11,131 7,963 3,296 ' 41.4% 937 11.8% 3 2,654 5,052 0.63 Cluster 18 10,779 7,891 3,295 41.8% 900 11.4% 3 2,630 5,052 0.64 Cluster 19 11,637 8,325 3,012 36.2% 1,050 12.6% 3 2,775 4,382 0.53 Cluster20 11,269 8,325 3,012 36.2% 919 11.0% 3 2,775 4,382 0.53 Cluster 21 10,216 7,307 2,194 30.0% 442 6.0% 2 3,654 3,106 0.43 Cluster22 9,893 7,307 2,194 30.0% 739 10.1% 2 3,654 3,106 0.43 Cluster 23 9,406 9,406 3,285 34.9% 1,204 12.8% 3 3,135 4,659 0.50 Cluster24 8,316 8,316 3,012 36.2% 1,037 12.5% 3 2,772 4,382 0.53 Cluster25 10,242 10,242 2,736 26.7% 1,376 13.4% 4 2,561 5,658 0.55 Cluster26 11,714 11,714 4,284 36.6% 1,496 12.8% 4 2,929 6,099 0.52 Cluster27 12,656 9,393 2,820 30.0% 1,014 10.8% 3 3,131 4,269 0.45 Cluster 28 9,315 9,315 2,820 30.3% 0.0% 3 3,105 4,269 0.46, Cluster 29 12,993 12,993 4,385 33.7% 1,448 11.1% 4 3,248 6,212 0.48 Cluster 30 17,314 13,112 4,384 33.4% 1,775 13.5% 4 3,278 6,212 0.47 Cluster 31 21,597 14,589 4,284 29.4% 1,316 9.0% 4 3,647 6,099 0.42 Cluster 32 8,524 7,099 2,192 30.9% 660 9.3% 2 3,550 3,106 0.44 Cluster33 16,707 14,703 4,283 29.1% 1,420 9.7% 4 3,676 6,099 0.41 Averages= 12,734 10,570 3,518 33.7% 1,274 11.5% 3,857 0.50 Baxter Square Subdivision Area Tabulations Individual Lots Lot Lot Area(ft2) Lot Area Excluding Building %Building Driveway % Driveway Liveable Private Street Easement Area(ft2) Coverage Area(ft2) Space(ft2) FAR Lot 1 6,667 3,859 1,092 28.3% 254 6.6% 1,684 0.44 Lot 2 3,042 2,574 1,100 42.7% 324 12.6% 1,684 0.65 Lot 3 3,627 3,069 1,105 36.0% 318 10.4% 1,684 0.55 Lot 4 3,627 3,069 1,105 36.0% 335 10.9% 1,684 0.55 Lot 5 4,680 3,960 1,105 27.9% 268 6.8% 1,684 0.43 Lot 6 3,454 3,454 1,102 31.9% 314 9.1% 1,684 0.49 Lot 7 2,914 2,914 1,105 37.9% 245 8.4% 1,684 0.58 Lot 8 2,914 2,914 1,102 37.8% 300 10.3% 1,684 0.58 Lot 9 2,444 2,444 1,102 45.1% 318 13.0% 1,684 0.69 Lot 10 5,359 3,667 1,092 29.8% 250 6.8% 1,684 0.46 Lot 11 17,051 14,413 3,300 22.9% 4,396 30.5% 6,872 0.48 Lot 12 3,596 3,038 1,090 35.9% 253 8.3% 1,684 0.55 Lot 13 3,016 2,548 1,102 43.2% 325 12.8% 1,684 0.66 Lot 14 5,776 4,440 1,102 24.8% 488 11.0% 1,684 0.38 Lot 15 10,093 7,651 1,588 20.8% 374 4.9% 1,104 0.14 Lot 16 2,838 2,838 939 33.1% 470 16.6% 1,043 0.37 Lot 17 2,747 2,747 938 34.1% 420 15.3% 1,043 0.38 Lot 18 3,685 3,685 1,105 30.0% 326 8.8% 1,684 0.46 Lot 19 3,497 3,497 1,105 31.6% 310 8.9% 1,684 0.48 Lot 20 2,827 2,827 1,102 39.0% 345 12.2% 1,684 0.60 Lot 21 2,765 2,765 1,102 39.9% 309 11.2% 1,684 0.61 Lot 22 3,260 3,260 1,092 33.5% 233 7.1% 1,684 0.52 Lot 23 3,255, 3,255 1,105 33.9% 250 7.7% 1,684 0.52 Lot 24 2,730 2,730 1,105 40.5% 335 12.3% 1,684 0.62 Lot 25 2,730 2,730 1,105 40.5% 320 11.7% 1,684 0.62 Lot 26 3,255 3,255 1,092 33.5% 270 8.3% 1,684 0.52 Lot 27 3,255 3,255 1,105 33.9% 254 7.8% 1,684 0.52 Lot 28 2,730 2,730 1,100 40.3% 341 12.5% 1,684 0.62 Lot 29 2,730 2,730 1,100 40.3% 345 12.6% 1,684 0.62 Lot 30 4,830 4,830 1,092 22.6% 275 5.7% 1,684 0.35 Lot 31 57,120 54,057 3,650 6.8% 2,284 4.2% Lot 32 7,888 5,884 1,272 21.6% 355 6.0% 1,684 0.29 Lot 33 3,066 3,066 1,096 35.7% 428 14.0% 1,684 0.55 Lot 34 2,220 2,220 820 36.9% 259 11.7% 1,043 0.47 Lot 35 3,533 3,533 1,095 31.0% 378 10.7% 1,684 0.48 Lot 36 3,539 3,539 1,095 30.9% 362 10.2% 1,684 0.48 Lot 37 3,018 3,018 1,096 36.3% 362 12.0% 1,684 0.56 Lot 38 3,005 3,005 1,096 36.5% 362 12.0% 1,684 0.56 Lot 39 3,431 3,431 1,098 32.0% 362 10.6% 1,684 0.49 Lot 40 2,555 2,555 820 32.1% 225 8.8% 1,684 0.66 Lot 41 2,022 2,022 820 40.6% 225 11.1% 1,043 0.52 Lot42 4,738 4,738 1,180 24.9% 324 6.8% 1,684 0.36 Lot 43 6,581 4,819 1,180 24.5% 324 6.7% 1,717 0.36 Lot 44 2,650 2,030 820 40.4% 340 16.7% 1,276 0.63 Lot 45 3,425 2,544 820 32.2% 350 13.8% 1,276 0.50 Lot46 4,526 3,384 1,096 32.4% 534 15.8% 1,553 0.46 Lot 47 3,995 3,019 1,096 36.3% 428 14.2% 1,553 0.51 Lot 48 4,077 3,115 1,096 35.2% 490 15.7% 1,553 0.50 Lot 49 4,716 3,594 1,096 30.5% 323 9.0% 1,553 0.43 Lot 50 4,679 3,557 1,096 30.8% 395 11.1% 1,553 0.44 Lot 51 2,954 2,249 820 36.5% 226 10.0% 1,276 0.57 Lot 52 4,044 3,083 1,096 35.5% 335 10.9% 1,553 0.50 Lot 53 9,920 5,700 1,272 22.3% 360 6.3% 1,717 0.30 Lot 54 4,423 3,695 1,066 28.8% 360 9.7% 1,553 0.42 Lot 55 4,101 3,404 1,126 33.1% 300 8.8% 1,553 0.46 Lot 56 4,756 4,018 1,092 27.2% 292 7.3% 1,684 0.42 Lot 57 3,016 2,548 1,102 43.2% 342 13.4% 1,684 0.66 Lot 58 3,016 2,548 1,102 43.2% 358 14.1% 1,684 0.66 Lot 59 3,596 3,038 1,105 36.4% 269 8.9% 1,684 0.55 Lot 60 3,596 3,038 1,092 35.9% 292 9.6% 1,684 0.55 t Lot 61 3,016 18,548 1,105 43.4% 342 1 1,684 0.66 Lot 62 3,016 ,548 1,105 43.4% 358 14. /0 1,684 0.66 ;Lot 63 3,596 3,038 1,105 36.4% 269 8.9% 1,684 0.55 Lot 64 3,596 3,038 1,092 35.9% 292 9.6% 1,684 0.55 Lot 65 3,016 2,548 1,105 43.4% 342 13.4% 1,684 0.66 Lot 66 3,016 2,548 1,105 43.4% 358 14.1% 1,684 0.66 Lot 67 3,596 3,038 1,105 36.4% 269 8.9% 1,684 0.55 Lot 68 16,798 14,182 3,300 23.3% 4,720 33.3% 6,872 0.48 Lot 69 9,495 5,326 1,587 .29.8% 423 7.9% 1,104 0.21 Lot 70 3,185 2,327 1,105 47.5% 387 16.6% 1,684 0.72 Lot 71 3,797 2,774 1,108 39.9% 387 14.0% 1,684 0.61 Lot 72 3,797 2,774 1,092 39.4% 260 9.4% 1,684 0.61 Lot 73 3,185 2,327 1,104 47.4% 320 13.8% 1,684 0.72 Lot 74 3,797 2,790 1,099 39.4% 320 11.5% 1,684 0.60 Lot 75 4,287 3,167 1,096 34.6% 325 10.3% 1,553 0.49 Lot 76 2,695 1,991 820 41.2% 200 10.0% 1,276 0.64 Lot 77 4,287 3,167 1,096 34.6% 394 12.4% 1,553 0.49 Lot 78 4,288 3,167 1,100 34.7% 381 12.0% 1,553 0.49 Lot 79 5,605 4,140 1,094 26.4% 358 8.6% 1,553 0.38 Lot 80 5,788 4,140 1,098 26.5% 442 10.7% 1,553 0.38 Lot 81 4,428 3,167 1,096 34.6% 409 12.9% 1,553 0.49 Lot 82 4,427 3,167 1,096 34.6% 422 13.3% 1,553 0.49 ''Lot 83 2,783 1,991 820 41.2% 268 13.5% 1,276 0.64 Lot 84 4,427 3,167 1,096 34.6% 360 11.4% 1,553 0.49 Lot 85 3,921 2,805 1,102 39.3% 290 10.3% 1,684 0.60 Lot 86 3,289 2,353 1,102 46.8% 392 16.7% 1,684 0.72 Lot87 3,921 2,805 1,092 38.9% 255 9.1% 1,684 0.60 Lot 88 3,921 2,805 1,111 39.6% 255 9.1% 1,684 0.60 Lot 89 3,289 2,353 1,102 46.8% 400 17.0% 1,684 0.72 Lot 90 9,805 5,386 1,587 29.5% 409 7.6% 1,104 0.20 Lot 91 3,528 3,528 1,097 31.1% 417 11.8% 1,553 0.44 Lot 92 2,713 2,713 1,095 40.4% 400 14.7% 1,553 0.57 Lot 93 3,165 3,165 1,096 34.6% 387 12.2% 1,553 0.49 Lot 94 3,164 3,164 1,096 34.6% 417 13.2% 1,553 0.49 Lot 95 1,989 1,989 820 41.2% 240 12.1% 1,276 0.64 Lot 96 3,163 3,163 1,096 34.7% 380 12.0% 1,553 0.49 Lot 97 3,162 3,162 1,096 34.7% 436 13.8% 1,553 0.49 Lot 98 1,987 1,987 820 41.3% 270 13.6% 1,276 0.64 Lot 99 1,985 1,985 820 41.3% 300 15.1% 1,276 0.64 Lot 100 3,108 3,108 1,096 35.3% 370 11.9% 1,553 0.50 Lot 101 2,993 2,993 1,096 36.6% 473 15.8% 1,553 0.52 Lot 102 1,820 1,820 820 45.1% 293 16.1% 1,276 0.70 Lot 103 2,420 2,420 1,096 45.3% 358 14.8% 1,553 0.64 Lot 104 4,481 4,481 1,272 28.4% 372 8.3% 1,717 0.38 Averages= 3,685 2,950 1,067 37.4% '351 12.3% 0.55 gp2� CITY OF BOZEMAN �t DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT V 9� ' _ * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 World wide web: www.bozeman.net October 1, 2002 Voss Bowman 2015 Charlotte, Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Informal Review of Baxter Square#1-02034 Dear Ms. Bowman: The City of Bozeman Planning Office and Development Review Committee have reviewed the informal application for the subdivision of two lots into a 111-lot subdivision Planned Unit Development. The following summary comments from the September 24, 2002 Design Review Board meeting should be considered when you prepare your pre-application for Major Subdivision PUD: Annexation Terms for Further Development: 1. Connection to municipal water will require extension of the 12"water main at Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane to the west property line of the proposed annexation. 2. Water mains serving this proposed tract must be looped with no dead end mains exceeding 500 feet. This ensures adequate fire protections and water quality. 3. To provide sanitary sewer service to this proposed annexation will require extension of the Cattail Creek outfall sanitary sewer main. 4. Affordable Housing. Having recognized the City's concern for affordable housing, the Landowner understands and agrees that prior to such submittal of a preliminary plat application for all or any portion of the subject property, the future developer shall develop an "Affordable Housing Implementation Plan", subject to consideration, review and approval by the City of Bozeman. Should the "Affordable Housing'Implementation Plan"be deemed applicable, said Plan shall guarantee that a certain percent of the total number of housing units to be developed shall be managed and maintained as affordable in accordance with guidelines established by the City of Bozeman. 5. The City Commission must formally approve the Annexation Agreement before a final plat can be submitted for the proposed subdivision. Considerations: D6. he pre-app should identify all relaxations from the Subdivision Regulations being requested. 7. Minimum lot area for townhouse lots is an average of 3,000 square feet for the cluster. A table with a narrative must be included in the submittal that indexes the square footage by lot and cluster. 8. The block length cannot exceed 400 feet. The blocks on the east and west side of the property To be bisected by the private street. 9. The Adopted Growth Policy indicates a future north to south trail connection,to be constructed through the west half of the property. The trail corridor must be depicted on the plat with a public access easement. Partial parkland credit, for the trail, may be granted. The Planning Office will make a determination on the amount of credit that will be granted during pre-app review. 10. The subdivider must indicate the proposed use of any dedicated parkland and if cash in lieu of parkland is proposed then the items under Section 16.14.090.G "Cash in Lieu of Park Land Donation"must be addressed. 11. Based on the new revisions to the Subdivision Regulations, not yet adopted, the construction of a "center" may be required. The Center would likely have to be 1 to 3 acres in size and be located within 600 feet of the geographic center of the subdivision. Further detail and definition of a center is in the subdivision revisions online. 12. The watercourse, located on the west side of the property, has been previously classified by Fish, Wildlife and Parks as a"stream". Therefore, a fifty-foot setback for all structures will be required. The stream setback should not fall within designated lot lines. 13. There was discussion as to the adequacy of the turning radii for emergency vehicles, especially at the intersections of the private streets. Anything over 150 feet in length from the nearest intersection will require a cul-de-sac. 14. Will there be sufficient parking for townhouse clusters? 15. Street lighting will be required for the subdivision. Please review the proposed amendments to the Subdivision Regulations regarding this item since the requirements will likely be effective by the time you submit for preliminary plat approval. 16. The secondary access, acquired through an easement with the property owner to the east, will need to be developed to a local street standard from the subdivision to Thomas Drive. 17. Thomas Drive will need to be improved to half a collector street standard from Baxter Lane to the secondary access. The power lines will likely remain in what will become a median down the middle of Thomas. 18. Baxter Lane is designated as a Minor Arterial roadway. The property owner will be responsible for the improvement of the east half of Baxter Lane to the arterial standard. Page 2 19. The property is classified as "Residential" in the Adopted Growth Policy. Please evaluate your, project against the criteria identified under the land use classification. There is some discussion in the text relating to a mix of housing types. Be prepared to comment on this issue in regards to how this item is addressed in the PUD. 20. Consideration should be given to an alternative name for the development. Something unique that differentiates this project from Baxter Meadows would be beneficial. 21. In order for Lot 1 with the existing house to be sold prior to completion of all of the subdivision improvements would require financial guarantee of said improvements and the house would have to be hooked up to City water and sewer prior to final plat approval. While the Planning Staff and the D.R.C. try to identify all issues and concerns during informal review, additional comments or concerns may be identified during the formal application review. Prior to submitting the Major Subdivision application, the applicant should review the submittal checklist to ensure that the application is complete. Applications that are incomplete will be returned. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner JM/j m cc: Jay Bentley, P.O. Box 10806, Bozeman, MT 59719 Ken Flikkema, 8289 Huffine Lane, Bozeman, MT 59718 Baxter Square Partners, LLC, 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Page 3 BOZO, CITY OF BOZEMAN `�r9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2260 0 ! 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 <<�r 8 o��e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman, Montana 59771-1240 World wide web: www.bozeman.net December 11, 2002 Voss Bowman 2015 Charlotte, Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Baxter Square Major Subdivision#P-02048 Dear Ms. Bowman: The City of Bozeman Planning Office and Development Review Committee and City Commission have reviewed the pre-application for the subdivision of two lots into a 150-lot Subdivision Planned Unit Development. The following summary comments from the summary comments should be considered when you prepare your pre-application for Major Subdivision PUD: Development Review Committee: 1. None of the lots should be designated within the 50-foot stream setback. 2. The stream setback may not be calculated towards the total parkland dedication but may be calculated towards fulfillment of the open space requirement. 3. The'preliminary plat should depict a 20-foot wide public access easement for the 10-foot wide trail. The applicant is encouraged to meet with the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board to confirm the trail width. 4. The costs of improvement to the trail can be applied towards the cash in lieu of parkland requirement. Further consideration regarding the construction of the trail to the property line and the potential timing of full construction will be determined during preliminary plat review. 5. A determination, in writing, should be provided from Fish, Wildlife and Parks regarding the possibility of an intermittent spur stream from the identified north/south watercourse. `,6 The preliminary plat should identify the clustering of unit footprints (i.e., duplex, triplex, four- `' plex and five-plex). C'�7. The lot area within the designated easement for the private street cannot be calculated towards "'" 1he 3,000 square foot average lot size minimum. A table defining the square footage of each lot/building cluster must be provided with the preliminary plat submittal. 8. Setbacks for lots fronting on a private street must be taken from the edge of the easement. Vomeowners ll private streets shall be identified as "Common Areas" to be owned and maintained by the Association. 010. If,concurrent construction is requested through the Planned Unit Development process then a narrative must accompany the preliminary plat submittal that addresses the review criteria outlined in Section 16.22.030 "Completion of Improvements". The applicant is hereby on notice that the Planning Department may recommend a condition of approval that would limit the number of builders to the number of property owners of record at the time preliminary plat approval. 11. Baxter Lane will be required to be improved to one half a minor arterial standard as shown in the Transportation Plan along the frontage of this subdivision. 12. North 271h/Thomas will be required to be improved to one half a collector standard as shown in the Transportation Plan from the east/west street midway through the subdivision to Baxter Lane. 13. The 12"water main in Baxter Lane will be required to be extended to the western boundary of the subdivision to conform with the City's Water Master Plan. The internal water main must be fully looped. 14. The preliminary plat should include the typical street standards to be used on the project. All interior streets not meeting the minimum city standard width shall be privately owned and maintained unless approved otherwise by the City Commission. 15. The east/west street midway through the subdivision will be required to be extended to North 271h/Thomas. 16. The preliminary plat submittal should include a preliminary storm water plan. City Commission: 17. More variety in the number of bedrooms and the number of units would be preferable. 18. Cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication is not recommended. Adding pocket parks throughout the development is encouraged to not only meet the parkland requirement but to also "punctuate the built environment". The applicant is urged to discuss these options with the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board. 19. The applicant should consider contacting Habitat for Humanity regarding the possibility of construction of some of the units. 20. Exceeding the 120-foot maximum length requirement, outlined in the zoning ordinance, is a viable option given the architectural variety of the units depicted. However, this will require review as a Zoning Planned Unit Development as well. 21. Alleys are strongly suggested due to the confines of the proposal in regards to parking. The addition of common parking lots to the plan may also help alleviate some of the parking burden. Page 2 22. The applicant should consider contacting Gallatin Center to identify any possible east/west road connections that could be extended within this development rather the proposed location, which limits the design options. 23. The established block length and width create the preferred grid pattern. Alternative designs that eliminate the need for the relaxation to the standard are suggested. Annexation Terms for Further Development: 1. Connection to municipal water will require extension of the 12" water main at Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane to the west property line of the proposed annexation. 2. Water mains serving this proposed tract must be looped with no dead end mains exceeding 500 feet. This ensures adequate fire protections and water quality. 3. To provide sanitary sewer service to this proposed annexation will require extension of the Cattail Creek sanitary sewer.main. 4. Affordable Housing. Having recognized the City's concern for affordable housing, the Landowner understands and agrees that prior to such submittal of a preliminary plat application for all or any portion of the subject property, the future developer shall develop an "Affordable Housing Implementation Plan", subject to consideration, review and approval by the City of Bozeman. Should the"Affordable Housing Implementation Plan" be deemed applicable, said Plan shall guarantee that a certain percent of the total number of housing units to be developed shall be managed and maintained as affordable in accordance with guidelines established by the City of Bozeman. 5. The City Commission must formally approve the Annexation Agreement before a final plat can be submitted for the proposed subdivision. While the Planning Staff and the D.R.C. try to identify all issues and concerns during pre-app review, additional comments or concerns may be identified during review of the preliminary plat application. Prior to submitting the Major Subdivision application, the applicant should review the submittal checklist to ensure that the application is complete. Applications that are incomplete will be returned. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner JM/j m cc: Baxter Square Partners, LLC, 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Page 3 so, CITY OF BOZEMAN 9� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * _ ' Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 8 o?�e Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net March 8, 2003 Baxter Square Partners, LLC 8289 Huffine Lane Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Baxter Square Concept PUD #Z-03026 The City of Bozeman Development Review Committee and Design Review Board have reviewed the concept plan for the unified development of 121 townhouse lots and two 8-plex lots for property located at 5371 Baxter Lane. The following summary comments should be considered when you prepare your preliminary plan application for a Planned Unit Development: 'Development Review Committee: 1. The preliminary plan shall outline the relaxations being requested under the Planned Unit Development and demonstrate how the modified standards will create an environment, landscape quality or character superior to that produced by the existing standards. 2. The preliminary plan shall be accompanied with a narrative that addresses the criteria outlined in Section 18.64.100 "All Development" and"Residential PUD". 3. A landscape plan, with a full legend of materials, shall be provided for the park, commonly owned yard spaces, parking lot landscaping and foundation plantings for the apartment buildings and watercourse setback(18.50.060.D.2.g"Setback Planting"). Areas of common open space to be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association shall be noted on the landscape plan. 4. A parking plan shall be provided with the preliminary plan submittal noting the total number of parking spaces required and the method used to meet the parking minimums. Adequate street width will be required in order to utilize on-street parking(parallel spaces must be 9 feet in width and 24 feet in length). 5. The preliminary plan submittal must include a draft of the developmental guidelines. The guidelines should address the architectural design standards for the development that will be utilized to review building permits. Elements that should be addressed include roof pitch, roof height, materials and color palette, fenestration, garage offset and exterior lighting. 6. The Water Department will require Mueller Hydrant Defender Security Devices with locks keyed specifically for the City of Bozeman. Design Review Board: 7. Aggregation of the driveways would create wider yard spaces and allow for more on-street parking. 8. Landscaped boulevards (sod and street trees) should be provided along all sidewalks. 9. The two spur trails on the east half of the property could be eliminated. 10. So many driveways are not aesthetically pleasing. Alleys would be preferable. 11. Longer driveways should be considered to minimize the stacking of vehicles into the right-of- way and blocking pedestrian use of the sidewalks. 12. May need to look at widening the streets and narrowing the lots to allow for more on-street parking. 13. The trail system should be located to provide a future link to the regional park. While the D.R.C. and the D.R.B. try to identify all issues and concerns during concept review, additional comments or concerns may be identified during review of the preliminary plat application. Prior to submitting the preliminary application, the applicant should review the submittal checklist to ensure that the application is complete. Applications that are incomplete will be returned. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jami Morris, Assistant Planner JM/jm cc: DAK, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Rd., Manhattan, MT 59741 John Sinrude, 284 Frontier Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Page 2 S 11 T E JUM 6 2DD3 D �55 ADD PHONE NUHSER P,1RT'IEhR'of?V11 nc w__ - Z9S FRONTfER DRIVE (406)388-6973 `-_ FOZEHAN, MONTANA 59718 (406)S3-9-16S4 BOZEMAN� MONTANA DATE: S-'I y-O3 DWI-4 BY .JMS DWG.NO: SITE PLAN COPYRIGHT JJXG R ASSOCIATES INC. 2003 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED (DO - _ - - - - ce r- - - - I- , A c i ' F lu LANDSCAPE LEGEND LANDSCAPE LEGEND EIOTANIC:AI. PLANTED MATURE BOTANICAL PLANTED MATURE 9YM. QTY. COh9•TON NAME NAME NE KsHT HEIGHT SYM. QTY. COMMON NAME NAME HEKsHT HEICsNT FRAXIWUS AMERICANA I-VN G(B[B) I-y G[BIB) 33 AMERICAN ASH 'PATMORE' 0' 60'-l0' 9 AMUR CHOKECHERRY PRRLB MAACKII 12, 70'-Y9' q P ) V P �•4I OUERLTB MA.CROOARPA 1-IR•c-fB[B) VAR �NNSYLVANICA I-V1•c.[BIB) ® Iii. 17 WR OAK 17, 10 GREEN ASH dR LdiJCEOLdid 0' SG-60 IS HCNET LOCUST GLEDESTI4 TRIA.CANTHUS I-IR"G(BIB) b AMUR MAPLE ACER GRNALA [61B) -'.c fe[e) 15 BUFFALO JUNIPER PERIS SABINA I 'SKYLINE' 9' 18 EUROPEMI MOINTAIN ASH 60RB18 AUGIIPARI4 U. 4®' W I Y JUNI HALO 5 GAL 3'-5'9P�dD COLO'ADO PICEAPUNGENS b'-®" ,[�•r ALPIt.E LANDSCAPE NOTES: 5 BLUE SPR1cE bO-80' i"�JlYS I4 WPoZANT RI_AU_ 1!• 3'•5' L PROVIDE SOD FOR SITE EXCLUDING PARKMG,SIDEWALKS AND PLANTERS.PROVIDE Ib-70•m FERTILIZER AT 10 LBS.PER 1020 SQUARE FEET. POPWUS TIEI-MOIDES 1-UY C. 15 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA SPIREA"LITTLE JAPONICA Z GAL 3' Be LNIAKING ASPEN 0, 35'-40' "LITTLE PRINCESS" 7.ALL PLANTS AND LAWN TO BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR(I WINTER). 76 PROEBEL SPIREA 6PIRAERA E ABELIF LDA IB' TI. 3.PROVIDE ALL FINISH GRADING WITH 6•MIN.TOPSOIL THROUGNOUT. WEST O POPULUS-WI 1-VN C. II HIGHLAND POPLAR I, GOLDFLAME SPIREA BPIRAEA X BUMALDA I GAL 3' A.PROVIDE UNDERSROUI[D AUTOMATIC SPRNKLER SYSTEM THRO"CUT 45' 17' 'GOLIFLM7E^ [EXCLUDING PRIVATE LOT AFEASI WITH DRIP SYSTEM AT PLANTING AREAS. SITE PL,4N LOT OJMER PROVIDED-CURRENT LANDSOAPINS IN LOT AREAS BGAL£. SOUTN NORTH FOR DOW PURPOSES ONLY I EAST