Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About638300220658280964) Z-02004 WALTON HOMESTEAD :u'?'r y.= CONCEPT PUD 1503 Durston Road Oakway, LLCF_r;L January 3, 2002 a° z a S r O 71 O PROJECT ACTIVITY LOG CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NAME: FILE NO.: Z -O apnV DATE ACTIVITY STAFF STAFF CUVIUL. PERSON HOURS HOURS -r -o a 5 �� { I 1 1 , y � i FOR DATE 2 TIME 2 P.M. M OF cCI PHONED .le.. O ❑FAX RETURNED PHONE YOUR YOUR CALL 'p�//ARE CODE NUMBER EXTENSION M ES SAGE• V U PLEASE CALL WILL CALL vu- I S VV AGAIN CAME TO I ou�d 202 nb+ O sEEou , WANTS TO _ SEE YOU SIGNED FORM 4003' • �� • Wall-ton Homestead �� • P . U . D . }k} III'• - 1 Concept P1an .S.ubmittal • s� Durston Development Corp. Bozeman, Montana h C - ' T A Y L O R H A N S O N K A N . E A R C H I T E C T S III`.• y. A • i i • • T A Y L O R HANSON KA N E • A R C I T E C T S • • Decernber 26,2001 • Mr. Andy Er ple, Director • Bozeman Planning Office • City of Bozeman Bozeman,Montana 59715 • RE: Walton Homestead P.U.D. -Concept Plan Subrru_tal • • Dear Andy, i� We are pleased to submit--he attached conceptual information for the Walton Homestead P.U.D. Since we last met, we have more fully developed he site plan and better defined he • types of occupancies included in the project. We believe the current conceptual plan provides an excellent mix of residential and commercial uses and,as an urban infill project, conforms to the new'20/20`plan. We look forward to the review process, and hope to find Nays to improve the project. As you know,we consider the conceptual review process an opportunity to fully explore all i• possibilities for the project and address planning concerns identified by staff and the Design • Review Board. Working together we will develop a successful project for our client and the I 10 Bozeman community. 1• Sincerely, William A. Hanson, A IA Enclosures 0 WAH/wah Cc: Mr.Gene Cook Mr.Jim McClean • • 101 E.MAIN—STUMOONE • BOZEMAr., HT 59715 • PHN:406/586/.702C Fe X:A06/586/847,0 WWW.—HK-ARCHI—E CTS.COM ,I ,• i;M� • �� jpjp • �'+1f`[� !pj • ��k � �i � � � �r '� a ' — . � , ,, • �� - � � �� ,x, _ � �, _ a� _ � �` � � . . ,� - �. . . . �� - �� • '"� � ' � ..� . � •. � , � • • . � • • • �• �! �S • • TAY L O R H A N SON ■ KA N E • A R C H I T E C T S • Walto-i !Homestead P.U.D. Concept Plan! Submittal • • The following outline gives a brief description of the proposed Walton Homestead project. It'is our intent to keep the information on a conceptual level and only discuss key aspects of the project. Where the proposed design differs frcm current Bozeman Zoning Code requirements, • we will identify the differences and explain how our design satisfies the requirements. 1. Project Description: Walton Homestead is c mixed-use Planned Unit Development located within Bozeman city 11mit3. The project inclides multi-family condos, multi-family • apartments, commercial ofice,and commercial retail. Due to its location, the project will become a transitior f-om the predominantly resider:tial development along Durston Road, • the southern boundary, to the commercial character along West Oak Street, the northern boundary. The pro"ect design emphasizes this transition. (See attached site plan) • 2. Site Design: • a. Description of existing lard uses and charcc-eristics: The projec� encompasses a little over 35 acres. The site is bounded on the South by Durston and on the North- by Oak Street. To the East along Durston is. the Gallatin County Nursing Home.. • To the West along Dursto-i are single-family homes and the entry to an existing trailer park, which extends to Oak Street. North of the Gallatin County Nursing • Home is open land, which is currently used for agricultural purposes. Along the South boundary three single-family residences currently occupy the property. Twc of the existing properies will become part of the project. One structure will be removed; one will be relocated on the property and renovated. • The third, w~lich also operates a day care center, will remain. The majority of the property is currently open land used for agrici tural purposes. The land slopes gently from the South to the North with one existirg drainage • ditch that series as overflow storm drainage. This drainage ditch will be re-routed as part of the project. • The only significant ve5etation on the site is a series of mature pine trees along the South property boundary. .A number of these trees are dead or dying and will be removed. W'Inere possible the healthy trees will be maintained and become part of the landscape buffer along Durston Street. • (Please see site photographs and site survey drawing attached). • 101 E.MAIN STUDIO ONE • BOZEMAN. MT 59715 �11:436/P 86/7020 • FA 406/586/8470 • WWW.-HK-ARCHITECTS COM • • t '�� ,,� {i ,. - �. �{ • �? !, • �' • �• �,� '� • 4 • �� • l�" � • f '� • ia� `� �� i^1 •. �, ` '' �� 1M:� ;, y� . i',i{ '� � • n .� , '� ' .i", u�} r • • • • �� • • • '• � y • • • f b. Description of adjacent land uses: To the South of the subject property is primarily • residential neighborhoods. Bozeman Senior High School and Chief Joseph • Middle School are within on-half mile of the site to the Southeast. Directly to the West is an existing mobile home development. This facility extends • from Durston to Oak Street. North 191h is within one-half mile to the West. East of the project site is currently open land currently used for agricultural production. The Gallatin County Nursing Home is adjacent to the property on the • South boundary. Further East is a multi-family housing development. North 71h is within one-half mile to the East. i North of the project site is currently open land currently used for agricultural production. To the Northwest is the Bridger Peaks commercial center. To the Northeast is a commercial office complex currently under construction. • (Please see site photographs attached) • s _ • Baxter Rd. Griffin Dr. 1 -y Af-1 • Project Area R-3 8-2 8-2 • Oak St. L� • 5 wGoo 11� [10 -� s R-3 2 ❑ Tamarac • R � R_3� AS �• B-f ❑L D R 2 � ❑ • Dursto Rd �8❑ ❑ Q R 3 R 2 � 3 all ❑ 0 o -o ❑R 4 ❑�❑ 0 PU O❑ OCR❑ • i g-Q ❑❑ Men enh II s W. Main St. i 0000E1E❑11 • r— ULA o k St.®1❑ OF E-710000=E-K] Walton Homestead P.U.D • Page 2 of 6 ,y� �t �� .j �, • �' � �� r '� � y \'� ��,� �k • -� �� • `: . . • ,� � . ,� • • . . • • ;� • • �� • • c. Site Design Concepts: • i. Organization: The project has been designed as a transition between the residential neighborhoods South of Durston and the commercial development along Oak Street. The residential uses are comprised of • multi-family condominiums and apartments. The condominium element of • the project is located closer to the residential neighborhoods. The apartment units are the transitional element between the condominiums and commercial uses. We are also proposing a limited number of loft type • living units integrated into the commercial component. At this time it has not been determined if these will be rentals or condo units purchased by individuals with businesses in the complex. • The site is organized to maximize useable outdoor space. The residential units are arranged to enclose associated parking and create outdoor spaces between "pods" of units with common outdoor areas. This design • extends to the commercial zone with a central public access corridor extending from Oak Street to the center of the project. . • The project provides three public park areas. These parks are linked with pedestrian walks extending from Durston and Oak Street to the main public park near the center of the property. • ii. Types of Uses Anticipated: As mentioned above the development will be comprised of multi-family residential units and a commercial component. • The residential component will include condominium units and apartments. The current design includes 96 apartment units and 87 condominium units. While the exact unit mix has not been determined • most apartments will be two bedroom units. The condominiums will include a mix of one and two bedroom units. The commercial component will be largely commercial office space. In • addition a small portion of the complex will be retail uses. The current design includes approximately 85,000 sf of commercial office space and 10,000 sf of retail space. At this time it is anticipated these retail uses will • include copy center, mailing center, coffee shop / deli, etc. The retail component will be located toward the center of the development to serve both the office uses and the residential uses. • iii. Phasinq: The project will be developed in three phases. (Please see attached phasing plan) • Walton Homestead P.U.D . Page 3 of 6 • �h • r • It • 3 • • • • • • • • a iv. Street Design: Four new streets will be constructed as part of the project. North 15" Street will be extended from its current termination at Durston to • Oak Street. North 14" Street will be constructed as local access road from • West Oak to Juniper Street. Juniper Street will be constructed across the project site from its connection to North 141h to its intersection with North 15". Walton Way will be constructed as a private street serving the • condominium complex. North 15'h Street, North 141h Street and Juniper Street will be constructed to • City of Bozeman standards. North 15'h will have a pavement section 42 • feet wide with a total R.O.W. width of 65 feet. North 14'h and Juniper Streets will have pavement 38 feet wide with a R.O.W. width of 60 feet. • As a private access road, Walton Way will not be constructed to City of Bozeman standards. The pavement width will be 33 feet. • It is anticipated all public access roadways will have cn-street parking on both sides. Walton way will have parking on one side only. • Access to private parking for a number of condominium units will be from a private access alley. This alley is designed to be 20 feet wide with a 20- foot setback to the garage entries. This alley way will be paved and privately maintained. v. Parking Philosophy: Throughout the complex parking areas have been located to the interior wherever feasible. This allows the structures to • create the streetscape and character of the neighborhood. It also allows the landscaping to better become a usable and visible amenity along the streetscape. • For parking calculations we have adhered to current City of Bozeman standards. The only area where we propose to reduce the parking ratio is with the residential component. Currently, three parking spaces are • required for each two-bedroom unit. We are proposing one parking stall \1s per bedroom with a 10% buffer provided on-site. Additional parking will C be provided using on-street stalls. • With implementation of the new '20/20' plan the City of Bozeman is proposing to modify the parking criteria in the zoning code. Our proposal will be very close to these modified numbers. We have calculated a total of approximately 230 on-street parking stalls. We assume occupants of this project could utilize 25% of these stalls without negatively affecting access by visitors to the project site. (Please see attached site plan drawings). • Walton Homestead P.U.D • Page 4of6 I • �� !�i � S� } �, � $ � i � . . � .. . �� t. • ;� � � .� , • � .. (i i • f �� • ' � • .. Y � � . � � i a •m. • �+• ; 1 • N • �.. • • _3 • • • • �� r, `�i • t�' • vi. Site Utilities: Water and sewer services will be tied to City of Bozeman • infrastructure. The main water and sewer lines will be routed in the North • 15'h R.O.W. All services will be designed and installed per City of Bozeman requirements. • The utility design is very preliminary in nature, and final layout and sizing • will be developed before final submittal. (Please see attached conceptual utility drawing). e I Architectural Concepts: • a. Residential Components: The residential components of the project are intended to be affordable in nature. The units will be small, typically two bedroom units averaging 850 sf per unit. The condominiums are targeted at first time . homeowners, single parent families, or elderly individuals looking to clownsize. The apartment structures will also be smaller; typically two bedroom units. The • target rental rates will be commensurate with typical Bozeman rents. The final size • and min: of units has not been determined at this time. The structures have been arranged to create usable outdoor spaces between and • behind the units. The parking areas have been located to the interior, allowing the structures to address the streets, creating a residential streetscape and neighborhood aesthetic. The residential clusters are connected with pedestrian • walkways, which wind between units and through parkways. The parkways • become the central theme of the complex. The structures will be a maximum of two stories in height. The architectural character will be of human scale and incorporate detail to emphasize the pedestrian character. Character sketches will be included with the formal P.U.D. submittal. b. Commercial Components: Commercial structures will primarily address West Oak Street. Commercial office space will comprise approximately 85% of the • developed square footage with the remainder being retail uses. The:structures are arranged to address the streets and surround the associated . parking areas. Open spaces are created between units for buffer landscaping • and pedestrian circulation through the complex. The character of the structures will be appropriate for the area, and will complement existing commercial construction along West Oak Street. Sloped • roofs Will not be required, allowing variation in building form and a more commercial aesthetic. Materials will emphasize commercial materials and include brick, stone, exposed steel, synthetic stucco, etc. Character sketches will be • included with the formal P.U.D. submittal. (Please see attached site drawings). S • Walton Homestead P.U.D • Page 5 of 6 it Q i h • r 1 • • • • • a 4. Landscape Concepts: • a. Pedestrian Access: The site organization allows for interior circulation pathways through the complex linking the commercial and residential uses. The pathways are routed from both Oak Street and Durston to the central public park. The • residential access from the South is routed through a linear parkway extending to • Durston. The commercial access is routed through open spaces between structures to the central park. • b. Open Space Organization: Open spaces are located between and behind structures to provide usable open areas and emphasize the streetscape. Landscaping is uses as a buffer between adjacent uses within the complex and abutting uses on adjacent properties. c. Landscape Design Philosophy: Landscaping will utilize indigenous materials in a natural way. Residential landscaping will be arranged in an informal way creating i a flow along the pedestrian walkways and buffers between buildings. Commercial landscaping will be somewhat more structured, but will retain the natural character of the landscape areas. d. Street Trees: Street trees will be installed per City of Bozeman standards. e. Public Parks: The project will include three public parks. The central park will encompass slightly over one acre. The current design for this park includes the R.O.W. for the West portion of Juniper Street, which will not be constructed until Juniper Street is extended to the West. This park will be developed as open landscape area with one small structured play area. A linear parkway will extend from Durston through the Southern portion of the condominium complex. This linear park will be a public access to the site, from the South, and links to other walks leading to the central park. At the North end of the linear park is a small public access park. This will be developed as a small gathering space of a more intimate nature than the central • park. It will be served by eight public parking spaces. o� The total dedicated park area will be 1.63 acres. 15' 6 `° • 3 • (Please see attached site plan drawings). 35 • Walton Homestead P.U.D • Page 6of6 pop P •JM �! (. � �� -' Y ��'--- - a � 1. r �-�.'p•� .c,�' f" y0 t1`t"z � H,7G!!? Ifii }} �� }H Y F f5 7• -4 �y�`�(q...ry �f �K� fy•.j�'+]-' �C i Yi pia:'i,,' Aw ►'1 Oil -- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r ;r I • �i • s r. . )1 - ' ,1, . :,^• - Egg: ' C "'nip Photos2 0 00000900 Photo Key Plan Walton Homestead P.U.D Site • • 'A� • ��f • +�# � �� • + �. ,�, °' •�, "� •H� �� ; �r • �l • �� .r � • �� • i�� • f, • • _ • I -- P I 'r y '��' g��n��'t'„�',:J,�K1 � I`+��` `t,• � '�j,�J,�ff}}�S ` �'� G�� ` ,6.� ` ,: \1?"{,�� ,� .r�9 arc�[ 'i�b.,a..�,o.:'' �', ��". �.`^"r9' - �`, •+ r `I �'��-cam -� ,, ' .yam'! • 4l _ -_ ..:.-- .._ .- -��—._ _ _.._\tom'=•ti..-�" .. - � _ 6 c Y Qo', _ '�' �✓• �� a•I �� ,�•r � •� � _ ''�� =_` ':-` � 1�•� � •--- i` — '�• t 1 .yam S,R�S ti 1• " i1E. ...:..MwMe�OG•!y91�.v._-,�._ -. _ -- _ .o-. .wJ�Il:AV�+JM.i. CI�' � .+1r � - - ter._.. �- '.� ■ �� # •,fir ,_ �, �J •� `l�,t��;� • e �. i • � � • • • • • ,� • • ,� ' . � __�, • � � � • �' • �� • 4 I� • :} �� •�h �f • it • itr l • n • o • fj {� • �� • —• �� ... • oats diro P f Y s 3 4 t. i. I Mi • r r , I rb _ <�(�\�: � � . | ,. ( � . . � �� . , . /�� : �� e3 . l �a { \� � . � .� . : � � : . �� + ^ � : �� . 1 �> 2� , � \ . . � X � � , �} %� 2� � { , . . . � ;. <��'\�/./\ _ƒ � . . . / / . � �.�« � � , & � ; > . % y . \ M. IlOMF:O ,�a, .O ""O e a� � O'1 or■ ��O i �f y, u ` O ,ate' � _ �' ,O � �a ■ - —t- � `/T— �\�41: -$�� I�I�"�.II 3 #— _•� —�--off /0 1 .. o• 1 7 o LMMMM � i�i"ii�� - II _ _ _ �� I� � M ,� �. , I�, ' ",ra ' �i i- .jY i�1 � ' w .f it i� d �� {i i I� ' ,�I p I� II � �p 7 _. I� �., it i� . I �i y li . ii ti �i i I� i� ' ii �� `� {} IP{ i 7 � , a- a _ _ 1�� ' �uuf I. if I u ,I I�� it �� , 1� . 'f 1 �, 1� u i� I' 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 F 12/19/2001 03:58:34 PM,Lucille2 I_5rI I�zl I m O I OPEN COMMERCIAL LAND 1 �I OAK STREET I I oa I o I I 0 0 0 0 O A�DDO�DJ � m 3 Al D O D_ m A z �I i _ aD n rD- m OrDDDU, 0mA m m 7� 0 II m � � SD�I l/�. �p�00�;D1� � ' DDr N crAL m it O d DA to r mDm�DCD1 (p iZm 0 III O r v (A D m z v " al D m N r Dm0 AmoA ftt II I I D �D I nD -D J U, ADD �N miDD O r N m ® P� A _ 77pp D — DN 1pA it D W 7C A 1z0� m 0 A II IT I. cDi N m J�A N y TIT 1 0 1 I _ (n y I ] a 70Na I m _ L I r 7 DN (" 0 " A N kpI m ; �� o 0 A e r G� (n O O N o I \ DN c I ,p o o II I p 0 0 o it 1 N 0rn A I � II O F ��m I o .II APARTMENT APARTMENT I c o I. mDc � g �1�1 -DDDD N -?f � . -j OD m A��D —1 cmm ]D c V —Ap I wF02fSLNRE ` AP I z p D M 3 p A m m m T p 0 �MPER STREET DT. \�MFM N " p LN X m A -( m z Z � � � _ � i �APARTME 1 l� E; - N m D p Z D mcD 1> D 13 v T� Z 6 m O ,mgy m v I APARTMENT NNA @z�+v ��E� z (OIZy M �'pm c� N V• z m r I N m N 1 APgR(MF(�„A A l —'I �, I I Po TVi APARTMEM IS • 0 z m N j v'm (J) DD e' r 1I ° I 3 (�LLL� D ITT P N m I .- 9 I � I I ; I ITT (1 m _ UIIIIU Otp it � APARTMENT APARTMENT APARTMENT I (P OII CONDOS CONDOS CONDOS I x II I O z _ LJ II CONDOS v I / Oz / O O EI. 8 g n I IICONDOS z O I I g $ pD 1 II CONDOS O / O z z I g g n o A; (p FDA 9oN�O zZT1> 2 O � I "o zpD (PITT m 3Nmm � p Z 14_ [� II g ° o I Nu D�m00 mzA ( z s < I z n u (p rr-E 3:D (p L� @ D Til (, 0 N I I g 1 8 z i n�N NOx�m A =O 1 n 1 (n — 1 $ mcD �m�`zD b m m m m II I �n zvc E m z N m, y I o - I t„m -EczL n E (n 710, J+ I-I Nm(n 1N N Z m D N m O 1 g mm 1S A N N N m -D N I I CONDOS Z I y y L�D m rl m ` 71 m A Z I $ _ (n N N O m m 0 --I- -{------- I c c N c m W z �) N z I I TDl 1 i m G� I =zs z m m o I I I � s (P — m N — . DURSTON EXISTING RESIDENTIAL A 1 T, E C T S DRAWING:. CONCEPT P.U.D PLAN D • , y Z O W N E R: GENE COOK & JIM McLEAN o O PROJECT O WALTON HOMESTEAD - P.U.D CONCEPT NUMBERDRAWING FILE: 0116 PESENTnTION d.+g PRINT DATE: NOv.T,ZOOt 0l 1 nozi.,-+N,"T • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 12/27/2001 11:19:19 AM,Lucllle2 OAK STREET 11 - I I 1 I mcnNN I I N --I1 1 D I I 1 - fNfl ICI I 1 D � -� R00 0 0 0� ,1 " O0 � Z I Ny I + I I (p � r o -n A I I 1 O -u I I I of s II I I A I. cz (, m o I �.r 1 ° N � z I � I ;\ I rnrn 1I A 11 0 01 �1 =391 -111111) � o III I I 1 111 Z. Z. D o ' rn N .o I z m 0 0 0 O N ctnrClO E ' I � z D I TEE z p D o II 0A D E D � 111 I II z A U' - -1 I I I 1 II I. I 'I I I I II 1 II o $ $ D I m p cn m i 1 m _ 11 a 0 0 � �II II nn I 3 � z m mD I I z A m m N A I r I 111 z 11 1 m �. I�--I -------+ I' D ri � I ° F Z Z I I 0 1 n = o m A ? DURSTON IT! r� I -1 Imo-, �I ro F-1 TAYLOR HANSON DRAWING: PHASING PLAN 1� N D J n OWNER: GENE COOK & JIM McLEAN 0 • PROJECT WALTON HOMESTEAD - P.U.D CONCEPT NUMBER BOZE—N,MT DRAWING FILE: 01 16 PESENTwnON.dwR PRINT DATE: oEG.]0,ZOOt 0116 B-z Js-z Gas— — — — - - —Gas=— — — — — — — — —Gas City Limits S 89'31'37" E _.._ ... _. _. ... ................... ... City Limits 2782.27' ier, Sec. 1 I � 1 I of I I R-3 it I I O I I; I. I I R1eyt y�y�. I 0 0 III \ 0 0 0 � � of 0 1 J vni er _ tit 1B i rBg _ ��"t1 R-3- - - - - - - - II � v, I. « City Limits IOd II II I I / � I. g °00 ,I 8 S II. 11 � R-3 V." _ I R-31 0 i. f I 0 II m� I II II Z I II o - I '{--� -� ------- A I I E I 1 ❑a `59 � Nest Corner, Sec. 1 N89'11'28"W _ 1234.01' — Cit Limits — — — — — N88°58'577W FR 'IR F3 — h 2 TAYLOR • N a'; DRAWING: UTILITY PLAN D OWNER: GENE COOK & JIM McLEAN O PROJECT N WALTON HOMESTEAD - P.U.D CONCEPT NUMBER MT B02EMwN, DRAWING FILE: on65T UTIL.dwp PRINT DATE: DEC.31.2001 01.16 B-z B-2 CL West Oak Street _em� — >� -,»5- / I\ o R-3 R—3 \� 1'_1-2—nS/Acres t d0_0 \ / l�1\/' R-0 \ \ l l N 1 \ N 8�9' W 61�.9�'/ p / O z \ / ^RJ 3 1 / \ coop — R-3— tz 62.654 4cres � "� t III r ul C 10 R-31 NO CA 183.20I cpL` True Point of Beginning I I �5 cV \ Ld W l a jai R-3 II R-3 L N Z A R H I T I C T S DRAWING: SITE SURVEY 0 n OWNER: GENE COOK & JIM McLEAN 0`\ PROJECT WALTON HOMESTEAD - P.U.D CONCEPT NUMBER BOZEMAN.MT DRAWING FILE: RME862-I.0wG PRINT DATE: DEC.31,2001 0116 t , I 1 . 1 © 0 © 4 A © O 0 A, EXIS NURSING HOME kkgg'' I (. 4 OPEN FARMLAND� OPEN FARMLAND� NURSING HOME � � � , P EXIST. aag a E NORTH 14TH.STREET F"1151 r (A)APa (A)AM �` OFFICE/RETAIL Q ZI LLr +a — IWALTON WAY — — I I .\ \ POCKET PARK POCKET PARK I - I / POCKET PARK OFFICE RETAIL Z 0 NORTH I5TH.STREET I Q I _ - _ NORTH I5TH.STREET— — j 1 / / i PUBLIC PARK — — --F-'I- — — `- / / Lu ———-- • APPRO_C ,.,ACR -POC�Kff PARK�-�-—_/ /�— �I�1�II�•�EH'• �—�I� �LE�- y7IJ ^ OFFICE --------- — _-- �_ J OO O E 0 0 0 a Zw � EXSTINOMILEHOMEPARK� U YO< Qoa i o a U UZ k EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK 0 0 p p 7F O 0 L UI Lu SITE CONCEPT PLAN z \ZE51 SCALE: 1•.100'-0" NORTN UJ IL. Q Z z � 3 0 0 OFFICE SITE CONCEPTS: APARTMENT SITE CONCEPTS: SINGLE 4 TOWNHOME SITE CONCEPTS: a -BUILDING ADDRESS STREETS -BUILDING ADDRESS STREETS -SINGLE AND TOWNHOME UNITS - PRIVATE LAND OWNERSHIP -PARKING INTERNAL -PARKING INTERNAL -BUILDINGS ADDRESS STREETS -PEDESTRIAN LINK TO DIFF.AREAS -CREATE ADJOINING OPEN SPACES -IMPROVE STREETSCAPE BY USING n a -CAMPUS LAYOUT -PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PARK ALLEY ACCESS WHERE FEASIBLE -BUFFER BETWEEN UNITS 4 OFFICE -BUFFER BETWEEN UNITS 4 COUNTY Ia -APPROX.30 EFF.UNITS INC. IN OFFICE STRUCTURES NURSING HOME O II -MINIMIZE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ON 15TH STREET Q SITE STATISTICS: SITE STATISTICS: SITE STATISTICS: oIei s GENERAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL GROUND FLOOR APARTMENT UNITS TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS - 51 UNITS OFFICE - APPROXIMATE 15,000 GROSS 50.FT. APPROX.56 TWO BED UNITS TOTAL DUPLEX/FOURPLEX UNITS - 10 UNITS 55,000 GROSS So.FT. APPROX.30 SINGLE BED EFF. IN OFFICE STRUCTURES ALL UNITS TWO AND THREE BEDROOM _ v, ASSUMING I PARKING STALL TWO STALLS /UNIT PLUS VISITOR PARKING ON r PER BED W/1091 BUFFER STREET «Las � ~ -AREA -AREA -AREA E a -GROSS AREA -RATIO -RATIO - 'U V) -AREA OF BUILDING FOOT PRINT -OPEN SPACE _ -OPEN SPACE _ W4 -AREA OF PAVED/PARKING = -TOTAL OPEN AREA = F -RATIO OF OPEN AREA = O Z� OVERALL SITE: I;. 4 O� -TOTAL AREA = 35.31 ACRES -TOTAL ON-STREET PARKING = 230 STALLS 0 -TOTAL OPEN AREA - 16.31 ACRES(4626 ) -DEDICATED PARK AREA = 1.63 ACRES(4.696) PRELIMINARY_ DESIGN p [ (� E WE JUN •5 2 0W2D SD 1 .0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O © © © © © © 0 _LAFARMIANU EXIST.URSIN IHCOUNTY OPEN OPEN FARMLAND� NURSING HOME E7D� NORTH 14TH.STREET c . T—�i- �— r Tr E``��R�E'—�J —r—ILA- --r - ��JJJJJJII — - - � O (4I APTS. pi,1 �J !� �1 M.� Lr;�F� ell � u S. • �+ c: E:) - a I I i.. WALTON W AV ,_ -- OI.... POCKET PARK POCKET PARK POCKET PARK J _ EXIST. � HOUSE I ID s OFFICE/RETAIL T_U Gm I I � � Z aZ o NORM 15 H.STREET I Q -NORTH I PUBLIC PARK - �T / / W 5TH.STREET ---_ � / - / APPRO% �'�_ / / SV - a 1.1 ACRE I '�----- ------- — PARK__ — J - � I ' — _ —1--1P°cKET _ _I�— J _ -(4J APT5. IAP15. - ------ II ' - L�� _--_OFFICE --- - �- --T--- J J�+� - 0 00 r / W W F MISTING MOBILE HOME PARK J � U Y Q 0O 0 0 Z Z p 0 o< C� U o UZ � 00 0 O � EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK 0 Q W' O 0 0 ul 0 Z � 00� 0 � o � IWI^^� d V m 5 O � N n n o SITE CONCEPT PLAN Z bPID SCALE: I":IID0'-0" NORTu — w M Q Z z 3 0 0 0 OFFICE SITE CONCEPTS- AFAfRT-LENT SITE CONCEPTS: SINGLE 4 TOWNHOME SITE CONCEPTS: II -BUILDING ADDRESS STREETS -BUILDING ADDRESS STREETS -SINGLE AND TOWNHOME UNITS - PRIVATE LAND OWNERSHIP -PARKING INTERNAL -PARKING INTERNAL -BUILDINGS ADDRESS STREETS -PEDESTRIAN LINK TO DIFF.AREAS -CREATE ADJOINING OPEN SPACES -IMPROVE STREETSCAPE BY USING u -CAMPUS LAYOUT -PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PARK ALLEY ACCESS WHERE FEASIBLE -BUFFER BETWEEN UNITS 4 OFFICE -BUFFER BETWEEN UNITS 4 COUNTY tr -APPROX.30 EFF.UNITS INC. IN OFFICE STRUCTURES NURSING HOME 4 -MINIMIZE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ON 15TH STREET N) SITE STATISTICS: SITE STATISTICS: SITE STATISTICS: r GENERAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL GROUND FLOOR APARTMENT UNITS TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS - 51 UNITS F is TOTAL DUPLEX/FOURPLEX UNITS - -10 UNITS OFFICE - APPROXIMATE 15,000 GROSS$0.FT. APPROX.56 TWO BED UNITS 95,000 GROSS 60.FT. APPROX.30 SINGLE BED EFF. IN OFFICE STRUCTURES ALL UNITS TWO AND THREE BEDROOM ASSUMING I PARKING STALL TWO STALLS/UNIT PLUS VISITOR PARKING ON Q PER BED W/ 10% BUFFER STREET F W -AREA = -AREA -AREA - a I �., -GROSS AREA -RATIO -RATIO = U to -AREA OF BUILDING FOOT PRINT = -OPEN SPACE _ -OPEN SPACE _ _ W1 -AREA OF PAVED/PARKING = is G -TOTAL OPEN AREA = O -RATIO OF OPEN AREA = C � z tl zz OVERALL SITE: � �z FA -TOTAL AREA = 35.31 ACRES -TOTAL ON-STREET PARKING 230 STALLS , -TOTAL OPEN AREA = 16.31 ACRES(46259) m -DEDICATED PARK AREA - 1.63 ACRES(4.6 e) PRELIMINARY DESIGN JUN 5 2IX12 C D I .O DEPARTMENT OFPLANNING `•J AND COMMUNItt DEVELDPMENT ■ p O O O O O O - ERl f � oz PoteMti aQ 6ricl Plcw�, (Vlci- pYo �po�-ed) `OPEN FARMUNO \ EIBST.G TIN COUNTY `OPEN FARMLVJD NURSING HOME,-law �. EUS. ARAG - - - - - I - I-7--7-1—r-T—r C-� �—-—�-I- -r�j �- � --i I •�- - - - - - OFFICE/RETAIL �—y �- --j I I I I I I I Lr�j �- I -� � �-------I----r-T-T 0 PUBLIC PAR% AFFFOX in i i i ii i iLLf-- I I i i I I I I — — ------R � I i i i I n Amy .I APROil J——% ----------—!=— —L—�—- —-�—J I LT L �———i I / I — I -- -------�-----—� 0 JW° III ---OwF F_C—E —• --- — \oz \ OFFICE RETAIL 0 1I - 11 I- —_T_ — ——a -- I E i w zIli 0 7j r IXET OFFICE W 0H15TH.STREET m3 OO O E%ISTING MOBILE XOME PARK J W IL CL ZLu z 0 00 � Y a a 0 r A APARTMENTS-B UNITS 13]TOTAL O O z O APARFMENTSIN COMMERCIAL-TSSSUMEI-TAL ( 1 u F 6 EIBSfING MOBILE HOME PMK FOURPLE%TOYMNOMES-B UNITS=3]TOTAL v DUPLE%HOYMHOMES TS UNITS=1.TOTAL Q Z O � SINGLE HOMES-11 UNITS Q EjE � O TOTAL UNITS.IyD Z Z V O STREET PAYING-3I4,B32 SF. � W o a Um s n nSITE CONCEPT PLAN j D WALE, I .IOrD'•m• - u NORTH LU Q z z 3 O 0 a G+ O-sj 207 3, LQI)A ovr •r{` Q W 4, Ln W I��Iy �1 P Z OF ■■ 3m PRELIMINARY DESIGN SDI .0 J � loz Poi e�hti aQ GA6 6 Plav� �Ylok pwpozzd� T I OPEN FARMLAND \ Ems.GAWTIN COUNTY `OPEN FARMLAND NUMNG NOME ! . ARAG j I - • - - LL - - - IIi III i - I ITJS -'1 II1 !1 II II�II� jii I tii •--LrI 1❑I -lI_.L-I ❑.J--1iIi I Ii!III - -- _- -I�! -] - IIi -- Il - EI 105JF-. ,Il - I I I I j - OFFICE/RETAL •—_—_ - I I . , I l UBUCPW I I I0 APPROX I -I-�1..S ACRE ------ 1 ❑i< As ilo DID iI LI —k - - - - - - D - I HOUSE •JO u. • WO I I II! -d NI APR II� // �--+� II II II�II 1II LII II1 IOFFICE RAL L r I�I I II �- pzF E`1 OFFCE UIIIIIIIU \�•\\.\ \ �\ ---—_ —JiI III—ILi —_— _ I I —I —iI I — —ILL - - /NOM i OFFICE II I i_.__ � ----- I I , -L1-T-rI I g CL CL Lu LLJ<I OE%ISTING AIOBILF HOME PNO(J � E 1 " O Z 0 z ao o asa O EASnN OO ` NI A N TS B UNITS- 32 TO TA o� O AATMENTSINCOAwECLL (ASSUMEI-70UNITS 0MBLE HOME PW FC1R1E%TOW0AE5B UNITS:]]TOTAL DUPLEX TO ES•I]UNIR ]•TOTA O SINGLE 42UNIR 0TA NI ! Z zF ol1 Z U O O STREET PAMNG-31••B32 S.F. w a o a (D n n � nSITE CONCEPT PLAN m Z ;� 9DIID SCALE, 1•.100'•0• - LL NoaTH W Z z 3 0 0 0 } pSj ) coo s 2,07 - ' rye °-pefl Fp Gt'Ce. 0 w w 0 x Zz O0 Ji 3m PRELIMINARY ' DESIGN 1 SD 1 .0 PRE-APPLICATION PLAT WA TON HOMESTEAD SUBDI VISION Q BEING TRACTS 1-4 OF C.O.S. No. 2085 AND THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 144, PAGE 373 LOCATED IN THE SW1/ OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, P.M.M, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA Existing 30'RCP B-2 18'RCP�t\l � I _ — $ —• G a s — — — — — —Gass— — — — — — —Gas _ Q _ Wes Culver _ ak _ I Street City Limits — — — - — —Owners �L ee sNoy ..(. (L r A�a�1 aEtarTn COS 2085, Tract 1-3, —J 1-1 I J SIN �. Deed Bk.144-Pg.373: Oakway,LLC, 1800 West Koch, Suite 5, Bozeman,MT 59715 1 I I 1 1 1 8 I , I I' COS 2085, Tract 4: Gallatin County, 311 W. Main St., Bozeman, MT 59715-4594 __ L Li I I i I I Existing 18"CMP 7 r II I Subdivision Area 1 1 Block 1: 9.906 Acres J LJ 11-'11 �I 4• oil / I Block 2: 4.901 Acres II. r .....`- Block 3: 4.389 Acres Block 4: 11.223 Acres — L_ 75 Streets: 4.956 Acres I I — I-- h ,I I I Total: 35.375 Acres Nate: t. 1 I 2 R—O \ i Phase One- Blocks 2 and 3. r• J I Phase Two- Block 1. L Phose Three- Block 4. gip°Cy 81o°d°1`iq I u I A I = s moo r 11J,leed Vl `--� , Exi tin9 24... 2 ott UNo�e50 W e o C__� L=-J ��LoN-t S� I Z3 N —� �I� I.A yl C=� C x n L--J u n PIII — V n n II C__]u ;LJ u Is i n C__165 n fl n • I I I I I I I I n r--� =seeo. �Qa LJ U LJ u u _ ex. % 4\,/ Q �,3 ✓4ry�p9 Se 1s Z4' 20 i a I 1 r Sire - - °tY 1t0ct y�IIItl1�1w v' r ^ ,II / — - G°tto18 09 (N ER_ Isltl Eawmw tT - U ,mod t 1 2— s:- coot t6///� � i I\Exi / r el -- / 12L__J I I .1 \ / �3i Gpeg15`e50. r-it�r 7 1 �f 4 h 23 — I -LTA w r �1Oct No L_ 3 as I I I I a III lo`c ` R-3 Eiiisting Well r R-3 r--> I \ r ,Existing Garage J r--, !r _ '��,� Block 1 �- I r--� I -- --- (� I _J r-n 'I °g 1 MP G°J� WBB}5837 1831 � �- �Existin 24 CMP 0 PoI t of Seg{nn/ng L- 6. I% E/ Ir —1 n t3 L J I It2 11 DurstonI= 11 = r o mad — - NBB'S8'B,�=Wy"c-- 83-3P' -6rty-L-imi/1---%✓�B\T4..`.W+�f 0 50 100 200 I SCALE: 1"=100' - R-3 Existing 36"RCP R-3 Prepared By. PEECEiVEttD BY Rocky Mountain Engineers,P.LLc. Civil Engineering 8 Lend Surveying JAN 0 3 2002 »0o West Koch Street,Suite 7 Bozeman.Montana 59715 (406)586-4859 CITY PLANNING Drawing File Name: 882—Dev.dwg 012/12/01 PRE-APPLICATION PLAT WA L TON HOMES TEA D SUBDI VISION ®, BEING TRACTS 1-4 OF C.O.S. No. 2085 AND THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 144, PAGE 373 LOCATED IN THE SWX OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, P.M.M, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA Existing 30"RCP B-2 B-2 18"RCP -" Gas—`- - - _ - -Gas_ - - - - - - -Gas Q _�- _ West alert _ Oak Street City Limits _ _© 12— Owners 1 4 DETENTION-l1 I'D ENTI01�1� DE1EN11 `1-1 I Any — &N 1 J 6 COS 2085. Tract -3, - I I n II I" 8' 7`-=�' — 'L Deed Bk.144-Pg.373: Oakway, LLC, 1800 West Koch, Suite 5, Bozeman, MT 59715 COS 2085, Tract 4: Gallatin County,311 W. Main St., Bozeman, MT 59715-4594 - LJ Li dd I I / / ll:.I.tln, CMPn is"—� i Subdivision Block 1: 9.906 Acres J L J r-I III' I Block 2: 4.901 Acres Block 3: 4.389 Acres - -r Block 4: 11.223 Acres -J Streets: 4.956 Acres �`= I `\ �•�., '� `' I Total: 35.375 Acres � I I=� � Note: �� y'. I I— I 2 R—O II _ ✓ / Phase One - Blocks 2 and 3. Phase Two- Block 1. IL ''1 Phase Three- Block 4. '_1 _1 R-3 �J°otadk 12 I I I _ Saba°+Q°* u _ 0aoppeoPlot 5t?eted --� :I. /P 'Ekt t'"g 24 P I „o0, c°°50, \ice o t° C°__ r'--1 I�I t� � \ , / -_ `• / t$ 10ge5t,Fsa.. C--I Clf C--] C--:1 \1 r 0 ETE FbW J C= 1 Li n !II II u — r--� .. _ ... ri. n n °° r l l I I II 1 11 1 L__J U L Li - zdl a�l W �I`✓�g �� °"pe. ler.zr-Sa Ia a• e 0 a 011°1g=k1 n e•z4'e ITL ^ ExI C I IS t t I / J DE ON'/l p L -JSTact/�; I I - h o110i'µam 50, Itoct J �I g R�j �sc.. { I I I � i .•. — N ZT — AliI In W r --, i ° �l n llal 10�_ ul_ I l i t R-3 2 I � Ekisting Well i�Ezlsting Garage L--J I I I J t ` L_—J �- Bloch i I J L--J L�I Al ) 'III L_-J I i - \;'�� E ting 1p, Pi I II i 1 r L-J t-- �E., In 24 CMP 4 y True POW or BeginnMg I I L I I"m ' � � t3 I L J J ter— Durston ' __ — — - —__ -- - NsaRcacT 10 0 50 100 200 SCALE: 1"=100' R-3 I I Existing 36"RCP R-3 Prepared 9y. MCFIVEO BY Rocky Mountain Engineers,P.L.L.C. Civil Engineering 8 Lend Surveying JAN 0 3 2002 Suit.7 B°zemon,Mont-59715�t.(406)586-4859 CITY PLANNING Drawing File Name: 882-Dev.dwg 012/12/01 so2� CITY OF BOZEMAN U 9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 � 83==-�� 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 1 CO moo? Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 World wide web: www.bozeman.net June 17, 2002 Mr.Gene Cook Oakway, LLC 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 201 Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Walton Homestead Concept Informal Review, Files#Z-02004 and #P-02001 Dear Gene, The City Commission has informally reviewed your revised site plan for "Walton Homestead," and as a result, offer the following comments for your consideration. Please note that these comments are based on my notes. The official minutes from the June 10, 2002 meeting will be available online within the coming weeks at www.bozeman.net. Commissioners Brown commented that there are significant improvements from the last plan. He liked the mixture of housing types and did not like the layout of the grid. He commented that the proposed North 141" Street may detract from the potential new jail site. The Commissioner stated that he recognized the difficulties of the site and that the new site plan has addressed most of his concerns. Commissioner Hietala agreed that the new site plan was an improvement. He liked the larger public park and also understands the constraints of the site. Commissioner Cetrero commented that the new scheme works better than the previous layout. Mayor Kirchhoff was unable to attend the informal review but has provided the attached written comments. Please feel free to contact the Planning Office if you wish to discuss the above comments or any other issues in general. Good luck with the project. espectfully, Sus K. Kozub Assistant Planner CC: Durston Development Corporation, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suitea0l, Bozeman,MT 59715 Taylor, Hanson, Kane Architects, 101 East Main Street, Studio One, Bozeman, MT 59715 Rocky Mountain Engineers, 1700 West Koch Street, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59715 bliol�i -CC CDuv� s.=Wa��, SSK� seQ, c„+1 a*uA rv -een-1� . IQA Of cv-AdW--NU- &lktn(q I�Pax_apg �fCM s - �or�w_o.�-eP" G` I il-i es bra:; s F—M)V-- 3A-A v e w G—Uj a cAa- �V� 0-\M- -A I- it/vm YA '500 0, S HAS) CAb A Z4 a-3-o-Is-� �I93L" �=U�� w fl Y_��W 0 /Ylo� q*e� - c,orn��.�::h -(--�P��° L`' • � � t f ♦'r f a r� s r 1 r - • r , t 1�=_ ,i�i ^y� $�` t� � - r ', '' tL:• y � 1 ..i f 1 ..a+ ii�• ' r ! ? i � , � , `.J � f` • f•• $ f' ' -�a.. i� ` � i 't �' �j ''"' i r. �` v , 1. 4 • VV -a- u I'R�- v V "a ce_ 0 r b��.r .a- ��o_��_mvr� s2a�si�i e, to (�, �bors — rVi o YIe pow ) • I"'` � ice` - ♦ ,'r• ,"t•� / - '� ! ` r� .. � ' � I-t r � .n t r • i f r .��}r r •�1 4 t. f � MAX--a tJ qo, — coo v)C�� WVnX c��ra+'Ir1 A—�2Ks &k16-J-7�4 q-ok (1k Afes a* nl nv5*1 vovat. ac+vc 4- --eq.1c� J-aun,+ ro Goo( . mdd solioi . w�' 1 , 1 � � 1 e. • . - � .. ` i 14 -- � � w / J •� ' � .r` I t1�.la, iI`t y.f.' � ! 'j rt { � } i r + � ' ' • `-i - � M tip. � _ 1 • 5..� tia `• I - , t '� ♦ ♦ Ire t, ` r + � "� .` • ��r�� 1 a . BOZ��r 0 V 9� CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT cc 188 CO.µ0 Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2360 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2363 Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1240 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net CC OUTLINE 6/10/02 Bill Hanson of Taylor, Hanson, & Kane Architects, representing Gene Cook, has requested a second "informal review"by the Bozeman City Commission of the Walton Homestead concept PUD. The applicant proposes to develop approximately,35.47(acres of-agricultural-land into a mixed-use �residential;'professiorial-office, arid.retail/commercial�planned.unif.developmeiit. Th_e_proposal includes r86 apartments, 70 duplex to fourplex_units, 51 single family�units, approximately 95,000_square,feet of,w commercial office space arid.15,000 square-feet of retail space. Based on comments from the DRC, DRB, and the City Commission, the applicants have reworked the site plan. The purpose of the City Commission reviewing this project a second time is to discuss some of the major changes to the proposal including: 1. Parkland-/_open.space;The revised site plan shows a larger public park (1.1 acres) and several designated pocket parks throughout the development. 2. Sttr of layout:;The revised site plan shows more connected streets and alleys south of Juniper Street. The street network north of Juniper has not changed significantly. 3. f Nilding- ayoil The buildings along Oak better address the streetscape. 4. 'Mixing_of`densities-and uses?The revised plan shows a greater mix of densities including single household condominium units up to 4-plexes. The applicants have also indicated that apartments are planned above offices in the northern part of the site. Does-the Commission supp r-t`"these_changes_and..are-there-any_otlier�major 'is-sues-that-should be addressed:prior;to.preliminary plat-and prEliminary plan,submittal? FILE REVIEW FOR COMPLETENESS BY IF COMPLETE, GIVE TO CAROL FO FILE. IF INCOMPLETE, WRITE/CONTACT APPLICANT ' t AND EXPLAIN WHY BY: ToDRC- To DRB: �— DRB Report due: ' -1 To Planning Board: 4_ Planning Board Report due: To Zoning Commission: Zoning Commission Report due: -� To City Commission: City Coirunission packet due: City Commission Work Session: Notice to Paper -- for publication Notice to Adjoiners/Post: r----- • • 6/7/02 Mayor Kirchhoff s Comments Regarding Walton Homestead PUD: In all essentials, my comments are the same as last time. While there are some fine elements here, as in the single family and townhome schemes, overall the plan needs significant revision. First and foremost, the street layout doesn't help to make a neighborhood--coming off McMahon's presentation, one might say the streets don't help to make a "place." The seemingly arbitrary dispersal of buildings across the development isn't made any better by the gradual curve of 15th Avenue, which 'loosens the stitches' you might say--the regular rhythm of building fronts--that contribute to making good streets. The tacked-on feeling of the Public Park at mid-develpment (not bounded on four sides by public right-of-way!) doesn't do what a good park should do, anchor a place. The park doesn't terminate a vista or achieve the levels of accessibility that it could and should. Moreover, I can find no discernible quality of life consideration in the open space scheme. It looks like wasted space, not open space. Why not consolidate the open space in two developed public parks, instead of construing side yards and unwanted back lots as pocket parks. Along 15th in general there is little coherence, little pattern--owing in part to the factors I mentioned already and also to the no-rhyme no-reason block divisions. What is triggering the block divisions? The interaction of building envelopes with parking and subdivision requirements--or an urban design concept? I would say the former. (Actually there aren't traditional blocks at all.) To the north, the edges of North 15th are perforated by weird vistas into parking lots, strange angular presentations of the sides of buildings, and the like. In short, the streets are not framing anything, and not holding up the "walls" of the community living space. To simplify everything by saying the development needs a grid is not quite on the mark. The real crux is, the design lacks character-defining elements. What makes this place attractive? What makes it coherent, like a home should be? Name a design feature that contributes to livability. I have named many negative elements, now can you or the applicant name the positive ones, that negate or out-weigh the disappointment that I am trying to convey? To argue that the development "isn't that bad," and is far from "the worst junk ever seen" in Bozeman or elsewhere, isn't much of an argument. Everything could be worse. What I want to point out is where things could be improved, and why I think they need to be improved before I can make a positive vote. To re-state, the streets are failing in their principal job: to frame the neighborhood and to knit together the fabric of this new buildout. Streets should be hemmed by hard strictures, by rythmical patterns of building fronts that shape the neighborhood's public space. They need to define the character of the neighborhood by serving up the architecture in an unobtrusive and helpful way. They need to provide an atmosphere that is congenial to walking and biking and talking to other people. That's what the classic 300-foot block length has achieved for happy residents of pre-WWII neighborhood across the country. The streets here are little more than access drives that provide entrance and exit to disappointing, disconnected, unrelated destinations. The north end of 15th is fronted by parking lots--ouch! The housing types are separated from each other and that's not very interesting condition to live in. And the office park is,well, an office park--and that's enough said. Please name a favorite neighborhood in Bozeman that separates uses and building types the way this plan does. I don't think you can. The design could be improved by re-thinking its street layout. More connections should be made, especially to the west and east, where future buildouts will be aided by a finer-grained street network than what is currently proposed by the applicant. A major failure of post-WWII development in 0 Bozeman is the failure of streets to disperse auto traffic. We should not continue to approve a buildout pattern we know to be deficient. The design could be improved by a finer-grained mixing of uses and types. It's a PUD after all, and there's no sense in doing a PUD unless you're trying to do something better than standard code allows. Is this a PUD for purposes of achieving spot zoning? That's not the best use of a PUD. There is no mixed- use here. There are different uses in the same vicinity, but not in the same structure. Even putting different uses on the same block would be a boost to this plan (I know the residential has different housing types across the street from each other). Why not mix uses under the same roof? There is too much office space, and the office park, like all office parks, looks like a parking lot with cubicles around it. Again--we should ask, even of the offices: what makes them a place rather than merely an address? The design needs to make sense to those who are going to inhabit it. This subdivision is simply a collection of units. I encourage the creation of real public parks bordered by streets, real blocks, regular rhythms of buildings, conscious design for people on foot and on bicycles, and less parking overall. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. .........._.........._.........................._................._................_............_......._..._......_..._...............-.....----....._.......... Page 2 Doz CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT V 9x * * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2360 20 East Olive Street o? Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406)582-2363 co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION FROM: SUSAN K.KOZUB,ASSISTANT PLANNER RE: WALTON HOMESTEAD CONCEPT PUD&PRE-APPLICATION PLAN REVIEW DATE: JUNE 5,2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At the recommendation of Staff, Bill Hanson of Taylor, Hanson, &Kane Architects, representing Gene Cook, has requested a second "informal review" by the Bozeman City Commission of the Walton Homestead concept PUD. Based on comments from the DRC, DRB, and the City Commission, the applicants have reworked the site plan. The purpose of the City Commission reviewing this project a second time is to discuss some of the major changes to the proposal including parkland, open space, and street layout prior to the applicant proceeding with preparation of the preliminary plan and plat applications. Attached please find a revised version of the site plan for the Walton Homestead development proposal. The applicant proposes to develop approximately 35.47 acres of agricultural land into a mixed-use residential, professional office, and retail/commercial planned unit development. The proposal includes 86 apartments, 70 duplex to fourplex units, 51 single family units, approximately 95,000 square feet of commercial office space and 15,000 square feet of retail space. The three-phased mixed-use planned unit development is located in the West Oak Street entryway corridor overlay district along its north boundary and is bound on the south by the collector street, Durston Road. Gallatin County lands and the County Rest Home are to the east and a mix of residential housing types in Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park and Homesites Subdivision are to the west. The south two-thirds of the property is zoned "R-3," Residential Medium Density, and the northern one-third is zoned "R-0," Residential Office. "R-3" allows for the development of one to five- unit residential structures providing for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of families of different size, age, and character, while reducing the adverse effects of nonresidential uses. Conditional uses permitted in the district range from bed and breakfast homes and churches to golf courses, day cares and lodging houses. "R-O" provides for and encourages the development of professional offices, business headquarters, and compatible multi-household and apartment development that would blend well with adjacent uses. Conditional uses that may be considered in the "R-O" district are similar to that listed in the "R-3." One of the principal points of discussion with the Planning Office, Design Review Board, and the City Commission involved open space and dedicated parkland. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board has recommended that the developer provide dedicated parkland situated at a single location within the property, in-lieu of offering a number of smaller areas of common open space dispersed throughout the mixed-use development. The revised site plan shows a larger public park (1.1 acres) and several designated pocket parks throughout the development. The Commission also discussed the desirability of a more grid-like street network. The revised site plan shows more connected streets and alleys south of Juniper Street. Planning Staff will be present during the meeting of the City Commission to discuss any technical aspects of the proposal, agency review comments, and/or general questions of the Commission. Please contact the Planning Office (Susan Kozub) if members of the Commission have any questions on this proposal prior to the Monday meeting. SKK/skk Attachments: Applicant's Written Request Applicant's Submittal Materials CC: Durston Development Corporation, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 201, Bozeman, MT 59715 Oakway, LLC, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 101, Bozeman, MT 59715 Taylor, Hanson, Kane Architects, 101 East Main Street, Studio One, Bozeman, MT 59715 Rocky Mountain Engineers, 1700 West Koch Street, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59715 -----..._._..__._..._...._............_.............-...-...................._..._..._..._..._...-............-.............-...._._ Page 2 Susan Kozub From: Steve Kirchhoff Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:47 PM To: Susan Kozub Subject: walton homestead Suzie, Please feel free to reproduce these comments in the way you see fit; some of these remarks are really directed to you, pursuant to our brief conversation at the MOR yesterday. Thank you! In all essentials, my comments are the same as last time. While there are some fine elements- here, as in the single family and townhome schemes, overall the plan needs significant revision. First and foremost, the street layout doesn't help to make a neighborhood--coming off McMahon's presentation, one might say the streets don't help to make a "place. " The seemingly arbitrary dispersal of buildings across the development isn't made any better by the gradual curve of 15th Avenue, which 'loosens the stitches' you might say--the regular rhythm of building fronts--that contribute to making good streets. The tacked-on feeling of the Public Park at mid-develpment (not bounded on four sides by public right-of-way! ) doesn't do what a good park should do, anchor a place. The park doesn't terminate a vista or achieve the levels of accessibility that it `'7 should. Moreover, I can find no discernible quality of life c a ion in the open hej�.�7 space scheme. It looks like wasted space, not open sp by not consolidate the open A� ,' ilb6 space in two developed public parks, instead of construing side yards and unwanted back 1 _� chi lots as pocket parks. Along 15th in general there is little coherence, little pattern-- Qr`� owing in part to the factors I mentioned already and also to the no-rhyme no-reason block,,� ,- e6 divisions. What is triggering the block divisions? The interaction of building envelopes with parking and subdivision requirements--or an urban design concept? I would say the cl ` former. (Actually there aren't traditional blocks at all . ) To the north, the edges of ��' North 15th are perforated by weird vistas into parking lots, strange angular presentations e of the sides of buildings, and the like. In short, the streets are not framing anything, and not holding up the "walls" of the community living space. To simplify everything by saying the development needs a grid is not quite on the mark. J.� The real crux is, the design lacks character-defining elements. what makes this place attractive? What makes it coherent, like a home should be? Name a design feature that e contributes to livability. I have named many negative elements, now can you or the It \\ pplicant name the positive ones, that negate or out-weigh. the disappointment that I am yp \1 rying to cgqn�v� ey? ��(M yes 1SS � ` t'4 ail. P,(�— 1Vl ,�aC �'jl�v d a � `)seen" X (� G'�Vl YvU�S t/�1.d— 'bad, ' `l Ntl.Ar Pd 1�ir�� / h,�VY i t W��►^e f o (0 To argue that the-development "isn't that bad, " and is far from "the worst junk ever seen" in Bozeman or elsewhere, isn't much of an argument. Everything could be worse. What I want to point out is where things could be improved, and why I think they need to be improved before I can make a positive vote. To re-state, the streets are failing in their principal job: to frame the neighborhood aSlr� ye to knit together the fabric of this new buildout. Streets should be hemmed by hard structures, by rythmical patterns of building fronts that shape the neighborhood's publi space. They need to define the character of the neighborhood by serving up the �7 architecture in an unobtrusive and helpful way. They need to provide an atmosphere that 6 �re congenial to walking and biking and talking to other people. That's what the classic 300foot block length has achieved for happy residents of pre-WWII neighborhood across thecountry. The streets here are little more than access drives that provide entrance andexit to disappointing, disconnected, unrelated destinations. The north en 15th isry lX y� r - using types are separa from each othe and that's of very intere i condition to A e o ice park is, well, an office park- � and that's enough said. Please name a favorite neighborhood in Bozeman that separates uses and building types the way this plan does. I don't think you can. �' .o 'J` The design could be improved by re-thinking its street layout. More connections should be! o,Y made, especially to the west and east, where future buildouts will be aided by a finer- rF grained street network than what is currently proposed by the applicant. A major failure i C of post-WWII development in L—eman is the failure of streets disperse auto traffic. We should not continue to approve a buildout pattern we know to be deficient. The design could be improved by a finer-grained mixing of uses and types. It's a PUD after all, and there's no sense in doing a PUD unless you're trying to do something better than standard code allows. Is this a PUD for purposes of achieving spot zoning? That's not the best use of a PUD. There is no mixed-use here. There are different uses in the same —_, vicinity, but not in the same structure. Even putting different uses on the same block would be alt=st to this plan I know tne residential has different housing types across�X , the street from each other) . why not mix uses under the same roof? There is too much office space, and the office park, like all office parks, looks like a parking lot with cubicles around it. Again--we should ask, even of the offices: what makes them a place rather than merely an address? The design needs to make sense to those who are going to inhabit it. This subdivision is simply a collection of units. I encourage the creation of 'j� C real public parks bordered by streets, real blocks, regular rhythms of buildings, conscious design for people on foot and on icycles, an3 e-I ss par in�rall. Thanks for the opportunity to comment, Steve K 2 v S a-CA - w �/L� ---n CA- P/w ti n uto, - G{J i w 911LI b& (o ti e-uT TAYLOR HANSON KANE ARCHITE S P.C. 101 E. Main St., Studio 1 ' BOZEMAN, MONTANA W LJ (406) 586-7020 DATE / • O 2 JOB NO. FAX (406) 586-8470 ATTENTION Su s� TO G/ OF j90 a Gy6'7/T/v RE: � �. i WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under se:arate cover via ��L((/�/L- the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES* NO. DESCFfiPTION to '� 'a2 ��'�� • /L�9-r�v;N�C' l7� I i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comrr:Bnt ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMA S v S'a vx " )`Y' N9% Se 6'1 /77 ,E 7V R-ie CXtey OPT s P /L T yr9�-r o�r s �¢►2�.¢S C� i? (�a✓Tic1c�i -v 7717� r 1X1Fv&a41f-�av--j m kou y 7?1E laevt]' oG COPY TO �Ge- VWY SIGNED: If enclosures.ore not as noted,kindly notify us at once. TJL • . EXIST.GAL NTY COU OPEN FARMlANO� �pPEN fARMIANO� � NURSINGNG HONE EwSf. O ,�I APIS. ,.,APIS 0 ° I I POCKET PART( POCKET PARK �- POCKET PARK j O 0 OFFICE/RETNL - - Q1, - p W � — — ,—r—r — — � — _ AM! I ~ NORTH ISTM.)IREET I Q NORM I STH.SMEET - - PUBLIC PARK - _ Y _ - / / W 5� I i in [) 6E 1)!� � Z i i lil i i I i i i I 4 OFFICE NI APIs. (4I APIs.. _I-1J - �-4- L W _ _ o ca �� a OO O U E%ISiING MOBILE HOME PARK U Y 0 Z Oa 0< `-EIMIG M09I1E HOME PARK j O U 0 Q W F O O a Z u � 0 n n SITE CONCEPT PLAN m z 9DIA SCALE. P•00'-0' NORTN W LL Q Z Z I � 3 I! o O o !I I i� I I� f Q W FK W • 0 Zz a 0� ■� 3m PRELIMINARY DESIGN a SDI .0 � � o 0 � � -� � � � -Z r � r,� � � � ' � � � � � � � � s � � � � � � ; � &- � �- 3 � ��- � f T A Y L O R ■ HANSON KA N E A R C H I T E C T S May 30,2002 Susan Kozub, Assistant Planner City of Bozeman Department of Planning&Community DevelopmEnt 20 East Olive St. Bozeman,Montanz-59771-1240 RE: Walton HomestEad P.U.D. . File #Z-02004 &P-02001 Susan: As recommended in our recent meeting we would like to request a second informal presentation before the City Commission. The purpose of our presentation will be to discuss modifications to the plan. . Please review e.e Commission's schedule and let us know when we can present our project to them. If you have any cuestions, or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, h William A. Hanson, AID. WAH/bjd 101 E.MAIN-STUDIO ONE • BOZEMAN, MT 59715 • PHN:406/586/70:2'0 ■ FAX:406/586/8470 • \J'NW.THK-ARCHITECTS.COM soz CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT V 9x Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406)582-2360 =: Z 20 East Olive Street 'le 1883- �° Fax: (406) 582-2363 co moo? Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net March 14, 2002 Mr.Gene Cook Oakway, LLC 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 30a, Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Walton Homestead Concept PUD and Major Subdivision Pre-application Plan Review File#Z-02004 and P-02001 Dear Gene, The Bozeman Development Review Committee, the Design Review Committee, and the City Commission have reviewed your concept PUD and subdivision pre-application plan to develop 35+ acres into 4 residential and commercial lots known as "Walton Homestead," and as a result, offer the following comments for your consideration. In addition to the written summary-review provided below, also find copies of the written comments provided by members of the applicable review agencies attached to this letter. 2020 Community Plan.- The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan designates the northern third of the property to develop as "Business Park" and the southern two-thirds to develop as "Residential." This project would be in compliance with the Land Use Plan Element of the Growth Policy. The 2020 Plan also supports the idea of developing infill within the existing area of the City rather than developing land that requires expansion of the City's area. Section 4.9.2 calls for new neighborhoods to be pedestrian-oriented, contain a variety of housing types and densities, contain parks and other public spaces, and have a commercial center and defined boundaries. This project meets many of these goals, however more land should be devoted to an aggregated park and other public spaces. Streets: A Traffic Impact Analysis study prepared by a P.E. licensed in the State of Montana and qualified in the area of Traffic Engineering shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer's Office. The analysis shall address existing and projecting traffic volumes on perimeter streets and level of service evaluations at those intersections prescribed by the City Engineer's Office. All required improvements identified in the study must be completed by the applicant. Some other key points regarding streets include the following: - An access permit will need to be obtained from the Montana Department of Transportation for the intersection of Oak and 15'h Avenue. This permit should be verified for 14t"Avenue. t -The developer will be required to install one additional lane, including chip seal, striping, curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the length of the Oak Street frontage. - As a collector street, North 15"' should have a 90' r/w, however the Engineering Department has determined that the 65' r/w is adequate. The City Commission reinforced the requirement of bicycle lanes on 15"' Street. -Note that both the DRC and the City Commission have voiced concern regarding the speed and volume of traffic on the proposed 151h Street. Appropriate traffic calming measures will nee ljto address these concerns. -The Mayor indicated that he would like to see more of a grid pattern in the street layout. =The Commission has also indicated that they would like to see a "hard edge" on Oak Street in terms of building location and retail. Infrastructure: The City Engineer's Office notes that capacities in the existing sewer main will need to be verified as part of the plan submittal for the project. An easement will need to be granted for the existing 18" sewer main as part of this project. The Superintendent of Water/Sewer noted that the existing 10" ductile water main in 1530 Durston Road will require two full pavement cuts as the main is on the south side of Durston. The 14" ductile water main in Oak Street will require one full pavement cut as the main is on the north side of Oak. Also, the "as builts" for Oak Street improvement show an 8" stub from the 14" main in Oak Street on the 14"'alignment. If this stub does not fit the proposed infrastructure, an additional tap in Oak Street will be required. An impact study on the 18" clay tile sewer shown on the preliminary plat should be provided. The water and sanitary sewer sketched on the preliminary plat concept plan application will require some modifications i.e. the location of the sanitary sewer and water main to detention areas, placement of the water main per City of Bozeman standard. Also, if water and sanitary infrastructure installation is scheduled with phasing, design and access must comply with City of Bozeman standards. Parkland and Open Space: According to Section 18.54.100 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, 30% of this project shall be open space. 35.38 acres minus the right-of-way is approximately 30 acres. 30% of the 30 acres is approximately 9 acres. According to the Certificate of Dedication for Park, Tract GL-3, the owner/applicant dedicated 6.159 acres of parkland to the City in 1984. The City has determined that credit will be given for half of this amount, or 3.1 acres, in the Walton Homestead development project. This leaves the total requirement for open space at approximately 6 acres. Attached are the written comments provided by the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board, dated January 28, 2002, responding to the parklands and open space proposed in the concept PUD/ subdivision pre-application plan. With the preliminary plat application submittal you should include in the Environmental Assessment a written narrative as to how the applicant has responded to the recommendations of the Board. Walton Homestead Concept PUD/Subdivision Pre-App Page 2 The City Commission has informally indicated that a significant portion of the 6 acres should be aggregated into a public park. The remainder of the required open space may be distributed into the linear park, "pocket parks"throughout the development, and other open space areas. All parklands should be dedicated to the general public, owned by the City of Bozeman, but maintained by the homeowner's association through a park maintenance district until a City-wide park maintenance district is created, or until such time that the City is in a position to maintain the park lands. Provisions should be addressed in detail with the homeowners/property owner's association documents submitted with the preliminary plat application. The applicant will be required to execute at the Clerk&Recorder's Office a waiver of right-to- protest creation of a City-wide parks maintenance district for maintenance and upkeep of dedicated park lands prior to Final Plat approval. Storm water runoff facilities located in designated areas for open space must be designed to serve as a landscape features that are irregular in form with depths of not more than 1 1/2 to 2 feet and slopes not exceeding 1:4 (vertical fall to horizon). Areas designated to serve as storm water runoff facilities may not be credited towards satisfying required dedicated parkland provisions. Subdivision Design There is a twenty-five (25) foot yard setback along all lots fronting Durston Road since it is an arterial road and a fifty (50) foot yard setback along lots fronting Oak Street. Please note these required yard setbacks in the protective covenants and restrictions, and final plat, along with the one-foot wide "No Access" stripe along Durston Road and Oak Street frontage. The detention basins on Oak Street shall not make up more than 1/3 of the frontage. Environmental Assessment: A full Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement must be submitted with the preliminary plat application as outlined in Chapter 16.18 of the Subdivision Regulations. Preliminary Plat Application: The preliminary plat application must be in conformance with the Bozeman Interim Subdivision Regulations 16.08.030, "Preliminary Plat" and 16.08.040, Preliminary Plat Supplements", and must include a preliminary platting certificate prepared by a Montana title company. All required certificates required on the preliminary plat would need to conform to Chapter 16.32 of the Bozeman Interim Subdivision Regulations. Per section 16.14.140, "Noxious Weeds", and 16.18.040, "Preliminary Plat Supplements", the subdivider must design a Noxious Weed Control and Re-vegetation Plan, to ensure the control of noxious weeds for review and approval by the Gallatin County Weed District. The Plan must be signed by the County Weed Control Office and submitted with the preliminary plat application. The noxious weed control plan must be made part of the by- laws and protective covenants for the property owner's association. A draft copy of the property owner's association documents must be submitted with the supplemental information for the preliminary plat application. General: Attached please find an application for preliminary subdivision plat review. Keep in mind that the comments provided above and attached written comments provided by the members of the DRC, the DRB, the Walton Homestead Concept PUD/Subdivision Pre-App Page 3 �r City Commission, and other applicable review agencies are based on the information and data submitted during PUD concept plan and subdivision pre-application plan review. The comments and advice contained in this correspondence are intended to assist the applicant in preparing the preliminary plat application. However, further comments and/or recommendations on matters not discussed during the pre-application plan review may arise based on the information and supplemental data provided with the preliminary plat application. Please feel free to contact the Planning Office if you wish to discuss the above comments or any other issues in general. Good luck with the project. qRectfully, Susan K. Kozub Assistant Planner SKK/skk Attachments CC: Durston Development Corporation, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite'pl, Bozeman, MT 59715 Taylor, Hanson, Kane Architects, 101 East Main Street, Studio One, Bozeman, MT 59715 Rocky Mountain Engineers, 1700 West Koch Street, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59715 Walton Homestead Concept PUD/Subdivision Pre-App Page 4 II ' If [I I If ' s , [I fIs- Fall ff 1fpin .. WiZ• ,Irm 'MI . . 'E, KIN II Wo fI , 17 . f 0 Ife i 1 '/p .fC _ t�! II f � f a �j Walton Hontstead PUD & Pre-Application Plan l•rmal Review I. Introduction: a. The subject property is located between Durston Road and West Oak Street. It is west of the Gallatin County Nursing Home on Durston and east of the Covered Wagon Mobild Home Park and Homesites Subdivision. b. The project proposes to subdivide approximately 35 acres of agricultural land into.4 lots to be used for a, mixed-use planned unit development consisting of residential apartments and condominiums in the southern part and a transition to professional offices, and some retail / commercial space in the northern part. I'll let the applicant explain the project in more detail. II. Zoning and the 2020 Plan: The southern 2/3 of this project is zoned'R-3,'Residential Medium Density, and is designated as:"Residential" in the 2020 Plan. The northern 1/3 is zoned R-O, Residential Office, and is designated`.`Business Park"in the 2020 Plan. �I R-0 0►- PP III. The purpose of the City Commission reviewing this project at the informal stage is to discuss some of the major issues including parkland/ open space, pedestrian circulation, density, the Oak Street envelope and any other aspects of the project that the Commission or the applicant wishes to discuss. IV. The first topic that I'd like to bring up is the amount and usability of parkland/open space: Total acreage -right-of-way=35.38 -4.9= 30.48 Credit will be given for Mr. Cook's 1983 parkland dedication in the amount of 3.1 acres. 30.48 acres x 30%PUD requirement 9.14 acres 3 GG,(`Q, �aAK 3 acvlo- ra *�' p�,,� - -3.1 acres credit 6� 6 acres total credit The Planning Department has determined that Future Juniper Street cannot count toward open space requirements. How much of the required 6 acres should be aggregated into common usable open space? Note the attached comments from the Parks & Rec advisory board and the Gallatin Valley Land Trust. Both of these agencies both support the idea of a common dedicated park. V. Pedestrian Circulation ...both within the site itself and as a connection from Oak to Durston. The Gallatin Valley Land Trust supports the concept of an unbroken trail corridor along the western boundary of the property to form a strong pedestrian connection from Durston to Oak. VI. Density The DRB has mixed feelings on the overall density of this project. Some members felt that the project seemed too crowded while others felt that this project, as an example of infill, should be more dense. V. Some members of the DRB supported the idea of more interaction along the street envelope on Oak Street through focusing the commercial aspect of the project toward Oak, however the North 19"/ Oak Street Corridor Master Plan calls for the property south of Oak to be Urban Residential`and the property north of Oak to be commercial � aqd k (pt VI. Questions? �In BCC M of BOZO, CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v 9'Z L: a Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street 1 83 0��° Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406)582-2363 co.� Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION FROM: SUSAN K.KOZUB,ASSISTANT PLANNER DAVE SKELTON,SENIOR PLANNER RE: WALTON HOMESTEAD CONCEPT PUD&PRE-APPLICATION PLAN REVIEW DATE: MARCH 6,2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At the recommendation of Planning Staff, Gene Cook, on behalf of Durston Development Corporation, has requested "informal review" by the Bozeman City Commission of the Walton Homestead concept PUD and pre-application plan review. Attached please find the concept PUD plan and subdivision pre-application plan to subdivide approximately 35.47 acres of agricultural land into 4 lots to be used for a mixed-use residential/professional office, and retail/commercial planned unit development consisting of 96 multi- family apartments and 87 condominium dwelling units on the south two-thirds of the property (zoned "R-3"), and approximately 85,000 sq. ft. of commercial office and 10,000 sq. ft. of retail space situated on the north one-third (zoned "R-0") of the site. Also find attached written comments provided by Planning Staff, the Development Review Committee, and applicable review agencies as of this writing. The three-phased mixed-use planned unit development is located in the West Oak Street entryway corridor overlay district along its north boundary and is bound on the south by the collector street, Durston Road. Gallatin County lands and the County Rest Home are to the east and a mix of residential housing types in Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park and Homesites Subdivision are to the west. The placement of mixed land uses within the development focuses on multi-family apartments serving as a transition between multi-family condominiums to the south and mixed-use retail commercial and retail space to the north. The applicant has conceptually discussed limited loft-type residential dwelling units to be integrated into the commercial component of the PUD. The "R-3," Residential Medium Density District, allows for the development of one to five-unit residential structures providing for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of families of different size, age, and character, while reducing the adverse effects of nonresidential uses. Conditional uses permitted in the district range from bed and breakfast homes and churches to golf courses, day cares and lodging houses. The "R-0," Residential Office District, provides for and encourages the development of professional offices, business headquarters, and compatible multi-household and • apartment development that would blend well with adjacent uses. Conditional uses that may be considered in the "R-O" district are similar to that listed in the "R-3." The applicant is proposing the mixed-use development as a zoning PUD in order to incorporate the construction of six-unit, multi-family condominium strictures, which are not listed as a permitted use in the "R-3,"Residential Medium Density District. In addition, the proposal is requesting to include approximately 10,000 sq. ft. of retail space that is not provided for in the "R-O," Residential Office District, unless considered as part of planned unit development. The applicant is proposing the development as a Subdivision PUD in order to have lots larger than 1,200 feet in length and a private street, Walton Way. The 35+ acre mixed-use planned unit development shall be evaluated against Chapter 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" and Chapter 18.43 "Bozeman Entryway Corridor Overlay District" as well as relevant chapters of the Subdivision Regulations. The Development Review Committee provided the following general comments. Please see the attachments for more detailed written comments from the DRC: - Design incorporates an acceptable street alignment for North 15`h Street - Possible fast moving and heavy traffic along North 15`h Street - The need for storm-water retention ponds to be better incorporated into site design - The amount and usability of open space/parkland The Design Review Board discussed the following general concepts. Please see the DRB Staff Report and Minutes for more detail. - The amount and usability of open space/parkland - The need for a stronger north/ south pedestrian connection - The need for unbroken pedestrian circulation within the site - Mixed feelings regarding either increasing or decreasing the overall density - The need for more public spaces and plazas - The need for a more interaction along the street envelope on Oak Street One of the principal points of discussion with the Planning Office and Design Review Board was consideration of the developer providing areas of open space in-lieu of dedicated parkland, or a combination thereof. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board has recommended that the developer provide dedicated parkland situated at a single location within the property, in-lieu of offering a number of smaller areas of common open space dispersed throughout the mixed-use development. Also, the applicant is requesting that the City acknowledge a Parkland Agreement (May 2, 1983) with the developer for credit of parklands provided with other lands in the community. City management and City Staff have informally commented on consideration of granting the developer credit for approximately one-half the 6.16 acres outlined in the expired Parkland agreement with the City. The applicant is requesting to informally discuss this zoning PUD and subdivision pre- application plan with the City Commission on Monday, March 18, 2002. The purpose of the City Commission reviewing this project is to discuss some of the major issues including parkland / open space, density, and pedestrian circulation prior to the applicant proceeding with preparation of the preliminary plan and plat applications. A written summary-review letter will be prepared containing all the comments provided for consideration by the applicant once the City Commission has commented on the project. _...._.__..._ -.__-- Page 2 Planning Staff will be present during the meeting of the City Commission to discuss any technical aspects of the proposal, DRC and agency review comments, and/or general questions of the Commission. Please contact the Planning Office (Dave Skelton or Susan Kozub) if members of the Commission have any questions on this proposal prior to the Monday meeting. SKK &DS /skk Attachments: Applicant's Submittal Materials A. DRB Staff Report B. DRB Minutes C. Planning Comments D. Engineering Comments E. Memo on 2020 Parkland Dedication F. Water/ Sewer Comments G. Public Safety Comments H. Recreation & Parks Advisory Board Comments I. Gallatin Valley Land Trust Comments J. Montana Department of Transportation Comments CC: Durston Development Corporation, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 101, Bozeman, MT 59715 Oakway, LLC, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 101, Bozeman, MT 59715 ; Taylor, Hanson, Kane Architects, 101 East Main Street, Studio One, Bozeman, MT 59715 Rocky Mountain Engineers, 1700 West Koch Street, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59715 _...._--...............................__......_............._...._. Page 3 I I � I I III OPEN FARMLAND i i I OPEN FARMLAND REIST.CO NW I i — — — —::GIRTml44lr STREET — — r II � APARTMEM APARTMENT APARTMENT W OFFICE/RETAIL/UVING F --bVAl�AI-Wi�Y I OFFICE/ li $I 1 I C PARK OFFICE RET coNDos coNDos 7I AL 1 0 �• CONDOS < >II CONDOS I � I O I I i s CONDO$ I �y c CONDO$ I OFFICE0 RETAIL I w m � Z I W I LIVING FWz C fZ B•B595rT wO� ' c \ CONDO$ ► oc Q a Z 0 W I I H lx c. O I I EXIST. III Z Lu Z CONDOS IIQ I D a APARTMENT J / APARTMENT T' V CONDOS I HOME �y j OU I I O I au OFFICE O O I I I OFFICE OFFICE RETAIL i= x CONDOS I ` > CONDO 1 Z S—Al Z ' I I a Y Z 1eREEISTREET I pFITH FUTURE O-- coNDos coNos SINGLE W ( T Z W o OFFICE w E ON LE a a a I e A ITXISTINGTRAILER PARK — — — — — — _ _ _ — _ a j .�II Oo 000aaa o o o �I �''r� • i W��g � � I I � � aILI SITAN Im NORTH ZIx z3 o0 0 0 OFFICE SITE CONCEPTS: APARTMENT SITE CONCEPTS: CONDO SITE CONCEPTS: w U -BUILDING ADDRESS STREETS -BUILDING ADDRESS STREETS -BUILDINGS ADDRESS STREETS Z -PARKING INTERNAL -PARKING INTERNAL -IMPROVE STREETSCAPE BY USING Q -PEDESTRIAN LINK TO DIFF.AREAS -CREATE ADJOINING OPEN SPACES ALLEY ACCESS WHERE FEASIBLE U -CAMPUS LAYOUT -PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PARK -BUFFER BETWEEN UNITS 4 COUNTY Q -BUFFER BETWEEN UNITS 4 OFFICE NURSING HOME • -MINIMIZE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ON 15TH STREET SITE STATISTICS: SITE STATISTICS: SITE STATISTICS: A GENERAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL GROUND FLOOR APARTMENT/CONDOS CONDO AREA- w OFFICE - APPROXIMATE 10,000 GROSS 50.FT. APPROX.96 UNITS APPROX.81 UNITS F 85,000 GROSS SQ.FT. ASSUMING I PARKING STALL ASSUME MIX OF UNIT SIZE PER BED W/ 109 BUFFER CONE 4 TWO BED UNITS) W TWO STALLS/UNIT •-AREA = 85 ACRES -AREA 8.5rc ACRES -AREA 852 ACRES O -GROSS AREA = 448846 SF. -RATIO 112 UNITS PER ACRE -RATIO 102 UNITS PER ACRE Z -AREA OF BUILDING FOOT PRINT = 96844 SF. -OPEN SPACE = 222,293 SF C5.1 ACRES = 59b9) -OPEN SPACE = 245011 SF (5b3 ACRES = 6629) Z. -AREA OF PAVED/PARKING - 105185 SF. -TOTAL OPEN AREA = 246211 SF. Q -RATIO OF OPEN AREA = 559 ..1 i 3 m OVER ALL SITE: -TOTAL AREA = 3531 ACRES -TOTAL ON-STREET PARKING = 230 STALLS -TOTAL OPEN AREA - 1631 ACRES(46.28%) -DEDICATED PARK AREA = Ib3 ACRES (4,99) 27 DEC 01 SD1 . 0 +TT, ', -Cf WALTON HOMESTEAD CONCEPT P.U.D. ZONING FILE NO. Z-02004 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT ITEM: ZONING APPLICATION NO. Z-02004 -- AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT P.U.D. PLAN REVIEW FOR A MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 35.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN WEST OAK STREET AND DURSTON ROAD, ZONED "R-O", RESIDENTIAL OFFICE DISTRICT, AND "R-Y9 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT. APPLICANT: GENE COOK, REPRESENTING DURSTON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1800 WEST KOCH STREET, SUITE 5 BOZEMAN, MT 59715 OWNER: OAKWAY, L.L.C. 1800 WEST KOCH STREET, SUITE 5 BOZEMAN, MT 59715 DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002, AT 3:30 P.M., IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, 20 EAST OLIVE STREET,BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: DAVE SKELTON/SUSAN KOZUB SENIOR PLANNER/ASSISTANT PLANNER ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proiect Description: The subject property is legally described as being Tracts 1-4 of Certificate of Survey No. 2085 and that parcel described in Book 144, Page 373 located in the SW '/4 of Section 1, T1S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and is further identified as property situated between West Oak Street and Durston Road, located immediately west of the Gallatin County Nursing Home on Durston Road, and east of Steven's Subdivision/Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park and Homesites Subdivision. The site is approximately 35.375 acres in size and fronts Durston Road along the south boundary and West Oak Street along the north boundary. Please refer to the vicinity map provided on the following page. Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 1 I'z t i xu�i U,u'�$ ' iM Proposal: The applicant, Mr. Gene Cook on behalf of Oakway L.L.C., has made application for Concept P.U.D. Plan Review of a mixed-use residential, professional office, and retail/commercial planned unit development consisting of 96 multi-family apartments and 87 condominium dwelling units on the south two-thirds of the property (zoned "R-3"), and approximately 85,000 sq. ft. of commercial office and 10,000 sq. ft. of retail space situated on the north one-third (zoned "R-0") of the site. The proposal is also undergoing a concurrent pre-application subdivision plan review of the 35+ acre site as a major subdivision. The three-phased mixed-use planned unit development is located in the West Oak Street entryway corridor overlay district along its north boundary and is bound on the south by the collector street, Durston Road. Gallatin County lands and the County Rest Home are to the east and a mix of residential housing types in Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park and Homesites Subdivision are to the west. The placement of mixed land uses within the development focuses on multi-family apartments serving as a transition between multi-family condominiums to the south and mixed-use retail commercial and retail space to the north. The applicant has conceptually discussed limited loft-type residential dwelling units to be integrated into the commercial component of the P.U.D. The "R-3", Residential Medium Density District, allows for the development of one to five-unit residential structures providing for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of families of different size, age, and character, while reducing the adverse effects of nonresidential uses. Conditional uses permitted in the district range from bed and breakfast homes and churches to golf courses, day cares and lodging houses. The "R-0", Residential Office District, provides for and Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 2 1, encourages the development of professional offices, business headquarters, and compatible multi- household and apartment development that would blend well with adjacent uses. Conditional uses that may be considered in the "R-0" district are similar to that listed in the "R-3". The applicant is proposing the mixed-use development as a zoning P.U.D. in order to incorporate the construction of six-unit, multi-family condominium structures, which are not listed as a permitted use in the "R-3", Residential Medium Density District. In addition, the proposal is requesting to include approximately 10,000 sq. ft. of retail space that is not provided for in the "R-0", Residential Office District, unless considered as part of planned unit development. The 35+-acre mixed-use planned unit development shall be evaluated against Chapter 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" and Chapter 18.43 "Bozeman Entryway Corridor Overlay District". Chapter 18.54—Planned Unit Development The intent of the planned unit development concept is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and welfare, it shall be the intent of this title to promote the city's pursuit of community objectives as outlined in Section 18.54.020 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of the Concept P.U.D. Plan Review is for discussion of the applicant's proposal with the designated review committees in order to identify any requirements and applicable standards and policies, as well as offering the applicant the opportunity to identify major problems that may exist and identify solutions prior to making formal application. Section 18.54.100.E—"All Development Criteria" • Neighborhood Compatibility: The ability of the mixed-use planned unit development to ensure compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site will fall substantially on the aptitude of the applicant to prepare a Development Manual, which will implement the architectural and landscape guidelines for the project. Consideration must be given to scale, mass, neighborhood identity, landscape, orientation of buildings, use of materials, color palette, and specific architectural character-giving features that will define the architectural parameters of the planned unit development. The proposal will have the most immediate and greatest impact on adjoining properties to the west and should have the highest degree of review. Landscape, buffering features, open space, fencing and orientation of buildings adjoining the residential neighborhood must be considered. • Natural Resources: Existing vegetation along the west boundary should be preserved. Walton's Ditch, which runs the length of the property, is limited in use and does not show evidence of any mature vegetation, wetlands, wildlife habitat, or wildlife activity that would justify consideration of the ditch as a potential linear open space corridor in this area. Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 3 • Environmental Standards: Exterior lighting, both along the streetscape of North 15`h Avenue, North 14" Avenue, Juniper Street, and Walton Way, as well as interior off-street parking lots and the wall-mounted fixtures of each structure will play an integral role in implementing a unified theme for the planned unit development. The architectural guidelines should outline a lighting theme that reinforces the innovative design of the mixed-use planned unit development. • Site Design: Open Space — The applicant, because of the concurrent review of both subdivision and zoning P.U.D. applications, has the opportunity to provide either dedicated public parkland through subdivision review, 30% usable open space through zoning P.U.D. review, or a combination thereof. The applicant has elected to focus on the 30% open space provision, exclusive of yard setbacks and parking lot interior landscaping, for use by the residents and their guests as usable open space, and the possible development of approximately 1.63 acres of public park. The issue of usable open space for this mixed-use project is critical to the organizational scheme and cohesiveness of the development proposal. As a result, the purpose and function of usable open space within the confines .'of this development proposal, the immediate neighborhood(s), and the context of the community as a whole should be determined early on in the review process. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has recommended that three smaller public parks are less effective than one larger park located in the interior of the development that could serve a neighborhood(s) in an area of the community which currently contains no public parklands. Furthermore, the advisory body recommends that dedicated parkland should be provided with this project (see attached letter from Recreation and Parks Advisory Board dated January 28, 2002 — Attachment "A"). The applicant comments that the organization of open space areas is designed to provide open areas between and behind structures, buffers between adjacent land uses and adjoining properties, as well as an emphasis on the streetscape. However, based on the anticipated residential population of approximately 440 residents within the mixed-use planned unit development, the applicant's proposal may not provide ample open space provisions for use as usable recreational space. Pedestrian Circulation - Based on the site's location in the community, a hierarchy for pedestrian movement in this area involves: 1) a major link for a future trail system in the North 19`h Area/West Oak Street Sub-Area Plan that focuses on future Rose Park as the hub for pedestrian and bike circulation, 2) development of North 15'h Avenue as a collector street, 3) public streetscape for pedestrian circulation, and 4) private trail system within the interior of the mixed-use development. The Gallatin Valley Land Trust has commented on the desire of the community to implement a trail corridor through the development in proximity to the collector street, North 15' Avenue. A secondary trail system for private use by residents and their quests should connect with the desired north/south trail along South 15`" Avenue and any designated public'park areas within the development (see attached letter from Gary Vodehnal dated February 4, 2002 — Attachment "B" Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 4 The Development Manual for this project will need to identify how the pedestrian circulation system is designed to: 1) assure pedestrians can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties, 2) incorporate design features to enhance convenience, safety, and amenity across parking lots and streets, and 3) integrate the various land uses and avoid isolated pads of development. Treatment of paving patterns, change in grade, landscape, lighting, and street furniture should be incorporated into the design guidelines. Because the pedestrian circulation system will aid in producing an efficient, functionally organized, and cohesive planned unit development, consideration should be given to stronger connections between areas of useable open space and through off-street parking lots, as well as connections with public areas. Fewer accentuated crossings across the collector street, North 15`h Avenue, should be considered to limit the potential conflict between vehicular and pedestrian circulation. A high degree of emphasis on raised walkways, pavers, and landscape features should be given to any pedestrian crossings along North 15`h Avenue. Landscape — At the concept level the application does not delineate the amount and use of landscape intended. However, the written narrative provided with the application does define implementation of a more formal structured arrangement intended in areas of the professional office/retail land uses, informal landscape placements in the residential areas, and an emphasis on the streetscape. With exception to the professional office/retail area along the north one- third of the site, the remaining interior parking lot landscape areas throughout the project seem minimal. Major vehicular and pedestrian entrance points into the development, vehicular/pedestrian connections within the interior, building appearance, and useable open space areas are should provide an emphasis on a variety of landscape types and features that contain both a mix of variety, texture, types and seasonal color. Street furniture and landscape features located at key connections of the pedestrian circulation network and intersections of pedestrian and vehicular movements should be incorporated into the landscape guidelines. Storm water retention/detention ponds in front yards and usable open space areas are not desirable unless they are contributing features to the overall landscape scheme of the project. Section 18.54.100.E—"Residential Criteria" • The anticipated residential density is consistent with the development densities set forth in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. No residential density bonus is requested with this application. • With the preliminary P.U.D. Plan Review, the applicant will need to demonstrate that the mixed-use planned unit development proposal provides ample outdoor areas for use by persons working and residing in the development for both active and passive recreational activities. Chapter 18.43 —Entryway Overlay District The purpose and application of the Design Objectives Plan is to recognize the importance of three guiding principles to guide growth along the community's entryway corridors: flexibility, appropriateness and clarity of direction. Consideration should be given to using a "sliding scale" in applying the Design Objectives Plan guidelines. As a result, they are to be applied with an attitude of flexibility. The greater the degree of change proposed, the greater and more elaborate the degree of Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 5 review. However, the guidelines do set forth a threshold of design expectations and must not be ignored or cast aside by an argument that each project is unique. • Site Development: A stronger physical relationship between buildings and the street envelope of West Oak Street should be encouraged. Areas designated for retail should encourage pedestrian interaction and the ability to enjoy outside seating and public areas. A pubic plaza or public area, in concert with the project, as well as the transit facility proposed near the intersection with North 15th Avenue, would encourage social interaction between patrons, employees, residents, and transit people in the community. • Building Design: The architectural guidelines for this project should exhibit design elements and character- giving features that exhibit a unity of design and compatibility throughout the project, keeping in mind that West Oak Street serves as a demarcation boundary in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan for residential development to the south and commercial development to the north. Treatment of mass, scale, roof forms, materials, fenestration, color palette, and public/private areas should be used to encourage a coordinated development. Standardized "franchise" style architecture is strongly discouraged and should instead reflect regional character, history and climate. Buildings along the corridor should be designed to avoid the back of buildings fronting onto the entryway. • Signage: Signs should be an integral part of the overall architectural design. A common signage program,that specifies location, size, lighting, materials, and unified graphic design for both shared and individual signs should be expected. Low profile signs should be strongly encouraged along West Oak Street and should be limited to only project identification signage. The architectural guidelines should reflect the restricted limitations of signage for property located in the "R-O" district. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal for Concept P.U.D. Plan Review Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Comments—Attachment"A" Gallatin Valley Land Trust Comments—Attachment`B" Mailed To: Oakway, L.L.C., 1800 West Koch, Suite 5, Bozeman, MT 59715 Taylor, Hanson, Kane Architects, 101 E. Main St., Studio One, Bozeman, MT 59715 Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 6 'c DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE The DRB meeting, for February 12, 2002 was called to order at 3:35 p.m. by Chairperson Heriry Sorenson. Jennifer Willerns, the recording secretary, noted the attendance. MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Henry Sorenson Don Grund, Associate Planner Bill Hanson Susan Kozub, Assistant Planner Dan Glenn Karin Caroline, Assistant Planner Joanne Noel Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Dick Pohl Jennifer Willems, Recording Secretary Dawn Smith Nichole Wills Jim Raznoff Visitors Present Tom Simkins Rusty Vandivor Chris Nixon Shaw Thompson Nate Thompson Matthew Killian Mark Chandler Elizabeth Clifford Dick Prugh Gene Cook Susan Swimley David Kautz Dave Guetig Lee Hutahn ITEM 2. MINUTES OF JANUARY 29,2002 Chairperson Henry Sorenson called for additions or changes to the minutes. Mr. Pohl noted a change on page 2. Mr. Pohl moved, Mr. Hanson seconded,to approve the minutes as amended. The agenda was rearranged to place the Home Depot review first. E. Home Depot MaSP/COA/Dev - #Z-02011 - (Caroline) NW corner of North 19" Avenue and Tschache Lane A Major Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness and a deviation to develop a large regional commercial area to include the Home Depot Home Improvement Retail Center and related site improvements on 16+ acres within Phase IV of Stoneridge PUD, which consists of a total of 52.65 acres. Lowell Springer, Dave Kautz, Dave Guetig, and Susan Swimley joined the DRB. Assistant Planner Karin Caroline reviewed the staff report. She stated that MDT has approved right turn in and right turn out only for the North 19' Avenue ingress/egress. She reported there would City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 T� be a signal installed at the intersection of Tschache Lane and North 190'Avenue. She indicated on the site plan where the applicant had addressed recommendations made by the DRB during the informal review. She stated the applicant is requesting a deviation for the height of the main peaked roof entrance. Mr. Springer, applicant's architect and representative, presented a different plan with a modified back area, and he stated it was conceptually the same plan as the one in the submittal. He stated the entire site would consist of the Home Depot structure, with space for two other building pads. He noted he felt the concern of the DRB during the informal review was the building's orientation. He described the back of the building as utilitarian with a private area by the creek for employees. Mr. Kautz stated they have added canopies over the windows and extended the roof line to enhance the elevations due to the requests of the DRB. Mr. Springer suggested one does not see the full width of the box-like building as it is buffered by the 50'greenway corridor. Mr. Springer stated there are several pedestrian access points. He stated they are working with MDT on traffic control and parking. Mr. Kautz stated they have reduced the building size to 95,000 sq ft. with 331 parking spaces with landscaping. He noted Home Depot will share parking with the two future developments with no additional parking to be provided. Planner Caroline stated the project was reviewed under the North 19 1h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. Director Epple stated the applicants would not be required to amend the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. He noted that, following consultation with the legal staff on the need for a Master Plan Amendment, an amendment was not necessary for this application. Therefore, the Master Plan Amendment was withdrawn. Mr. Glenn stated he was concerned with the general idea of the entryway corridor becoming a series of big box stores. He stated the applicant has responded to design concerns. He asked about the top of the columns on the garden center elevation. He noted he would rather see heavy timbers and fieldstone, and not an articulated capital. Mr. Raznoff stated that he sees improvements on pedestrian access and facade development on all elevations of the building. He stated the intersection near Target is hazardous and the intersection looks as if it will be the same. He stated he would like to hear the rest of the Board's comments, then respond. Mr. Pohl stated he liked the way the pedestrian areas are identified. He suggested the south elevation doesn't match the rest of the building even though it is very prominent. He suggested an additional design element on the southeast corner to balance it with the other corner. In response to Mr. Pohl's question, Planner Caroline stated the monument sign is City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12,2002 2 17N ap Jp a shown near the main right in/right out access. Mr. Kautz noted they would welcome suggestions as to where the sign is placed. Mr. Pohl stated the main access will be from Tschache Lane. He noted if the sign is placed near the in/out access, it won't be seen from Tschache Lane. He suggested the sign be placed near the entrance to the lot at Tschache Lane. Mr. Springer stated that Jason Giard of MDT has suggested a sign location which functions from both accesses. Unrelated to the site plan review proceedings, Ms. Smith stated she doesn't feel that regional retail falls under M-1 zoning. She stated that the west side of North 19`h Avenue should serve as a transitional area and not contain retail uses. She stated the amount of parking spaces are over the required number. She stated she does not support the increased number of parking spaces. She noted she had a concern that the landscaping only meets 24 percent of the amount required. Planner Caroline explained the landscaping requirements were addressed in the conditions. In response to Ms. Smith, Planner Caroline stated that snow storage has been talked about and will be relocated. She noted the applicant has met the requirements for buffering the frontage on North 19'Avenue. Planner Caroline stated the garden center is enclosed. She explained the expandable seasonal area. She noted the parking lot lighting meets the City's requirements and mirrors the lighting in other areas of the Stoneridge PUD, though parking lot lighting specifications are not specified in the PUD. She noted the lighting on the west boundary would be a lower light level with no building mounted lights. She noted there is a flag pole light proposed, and some security lighting near the entrances, which shall meet the,code. In response to Mr. Hanson, Planner Caroline stated the water feature would be developed as part of this project, as well as two retention ponds. Mr. Hanson explained the graphic is misleading as the stream does not directly connect with the detention pond. Mr. Hanson suggested integrating the stone into the architecture of the building near the downspout areas. He stated overall he appreciated the applicant's attempt to address DRB's concerns. He stated he preferred Home Depot's parking lot design over Target's and Bob Wards' design. He complimented Planner Caroline on her staff report. He stated he was comfortable with the project. Planner Caroline stated the applicant was comfortable with the conditions as listed in the staff report, he and staff have resolved earlier issues. She stated condition number 22 could be eliminated and explained why. Chairperson Sorenson stated he felt the applicant had addressed the requests of the DRB during the informal review. He suggested placing the roof canopies far enough into the interior of the building to prevent a "stuck on" look. He stated the pedestrian trail along the stream corridor felt like it is struggling to find room on the site and become a part of the project. He suggested the stream looks cut off and not in the appropriate place on the site plan. Planner Caroline stated the path needed to be more natural, and the trail shouldn't be pushed to an area for City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 3 convenience. Chairperson Sorenson noted the pedestrian path within the parking area should have clear ends that tie into the asphalt trail from the north and south. He suggested the addition of a pedestrian area with benches. He stated the applicant has done a nice job of laying out the site. MOTION: Mr. Raznoff moved, Mr. Pohl seconded, to recommend approval of application #Z-02011 with conditions recommended by staff, except condition #22, which is to be deleted. A condition is to be added which alters the southeast corner canopy of the building to develop a stronger architectural element, another condition to incorporate architectural furniture along the trail at the intersections of the pedestrian pathways and asphalt trail, and a third condition to extend the peaked entry canopies fifteen feet into the building so it becomes a more unified element of the building. And the final condition that the garden center canopy element be moved north to the pedestrian canopy area and integrated into the pedestrian canopy. The motion carried 4-2, with Mr. Pohl, Mr. Hanson, Mr. Raznoff, and Chairperson Sorenson voting yes, and Mr. Glenn and Ms. Smith voting in opposition. ITEM 3. PROJECT REVIEW A. Simkins-Hallin Mendenhall Warehouse MaSP/COA/Dev - #Z-01235 (Grund) 609 East Mendenhall Avenue Considerations to modifications to a Major Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness and Deviations to allow the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a 7,500 sf warehouse for building materials and a mechanic shop and related site improvements on property located at 609 East Mendenhall Avenue. Assistant Planner Don Grund stated the Board had initially recommended denial of the project due to the amount of retention on site, the removal of existing trees, concerns about backing from parking spaces into the public right-of-way, and the boulevard landscaping. He stated the applicant has addressed those concerns and the architectural style of the building. Planner Grund stated the applicant has proposed to move the garage door to the west elevation. He reviewed the staff memo. He stated the proposed lighting didn't meet code. Dick Prugh, Mike Chandler, and Elizabeth Clifford, joined the DRB. Mr. Prugh reviewed the changes made, stating they eliminated the garage door on the south side and reviewed the changes proposed for the retention ponds. He stated the existing trees will be saved and six additional trees were proposed. He stated they have changed the lighting and asked DRB to recommend approval of the proposed lighting located over the doors. He displayed samples of the proposed siding. Mr. Hanson asked staff about the previous review. Planner Grund stated the applicant has agreed to install tree grates around the trees in the sidewalk in lieu of a boulevard. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 4 Mr. Hanson stated the.building hasn't changed much, and the site is constrained. He noted that overall he doesn't have problems with the architecture. He stated the site is improved by having the materials stored inside the building. He stated the light in the rear of the building is bright. He stated he is in support of the project. Ms. Smith asked about the outdoor light fixture, stating she was opposed to the projection of the proposed light and suggested a wall mounted light would better meet code requirements. Ms. Smith stated she appreciated the changes made. Mr. Pohl stated he supported the newly submitted plan. He stated hemlock was not a hardy species in this area. He noted he was pleased about the landscaped treatment around the site and is in support of the project. Ms. Wills stated she is in support of the project. She noted she would like to see something brighter and different than what is proposed, but is in support of the project as presented. She suggested adding awnings above the windows. Mr. Raznoff stated that he appreciated the design progress and is in support of the project. Mr. Glenn stated he had no comments, as he was not at-the last meeting. Chairperson Sorenson stated that the structure is very functional and pedestrian. He would have liked to see more architectural design and the elimination of the deviations. He stated the improvements to the site, including saving the trees, have changed his initial opinion of the project. He stated he is comfortable with the architect working with staff on the lighting concerns. MOTION: Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Pohl seconded, to recommend approval of the project with conditions as identified in the staff report. The motion carried 7-0 with Ms. Noel abstaining. B. Triple T Woodworking PUD - #Z-01244 - (Grund) 601 East Cottonwood Street * A Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to allow the use of the existing building for a small retail and woodworking op operation, including three caretaker units on the property located at 601 East Cottonwood Street. Nate and Shaw Thompson joined the DRB. Assistant Planner Don Grund presented the staff report. Mr. Hanson asked the applicants if they concurred with staff's conclusions, to which Shaw City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 5 • 1 J- s; Thompson stated they did. Mr. Hanson stated he liked the project and that the building was being brought back to life. He noted he liked the colors and stated the project was positive. Ms. Noel stated she was in support of the project. Ms. Smith stated she was confused on the locations for parking and trash collection. Planner Grund explained how the parking was calculated. He stated the three residential units are for the owners and the workers, therefore, there was not a need for as many parking spaces. He proposed the elimination of the proposed parking along Wallace Street. Mr. Shaw Thompson stated they will not have a dumpster as all their refuse will be stored inside. Mr. Pohl stated his concern was with the dumpster and the randomness of the landscape design. Ms. Wills noted she appreciated the historical background included in the project review and noted she was in support of the project. She stated she was confused on the materials to be used. Mr. Nate Thompson explained the materials and presented a picture of the siding. Mr. Raznoff stated he was still confused about where the parking would occur. Planner Grund stated the four stalls in the setback along Wallace Street will be eliminated. Mr. Raznoff then stated he was in support of the project. Mr. Glenn asked if the windows depicted were existing. Mr. Nate Thompson stated the windows were existing and were six panes each. He noted the rear of the building was covered by a warehouse and another building. He stated the new windows were on the rear elevation with double panes containing dividers for energy savings. Mr. Shaw Thompson indicated the windows which would be replaced. Chairperson Sorenson stated there were no elevations for the four car garage so he didn't understand how the garage impacted the site. Mr. Shaw Thompson stated it would match the building exactly with the same roof pitch and siding. Chairperson Sorenson stated he was in favor of the project. Mr. Glenn stated the asphalt drive in front of the building would look odd. He stated his main concern was the overall look of the project, including the landscaping around the project, the forefront, and the standard ground scape. He stated he didn't agree with the requirement for asphalt and suggested a gravel driveway. Planner Grund stated the Historic Preservation Planner Jim Jenks had stated the project would be appropriate with the historical aspects of the site and neighborhood. He stated conditions are suggested which would require the site be brought up to modern standards. He stated the City Engineer has additional conditions pertaining to curb and gutter. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12,2002 •`r' � ``�:'i, ''.� It , �,^'y MOTION: Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Raznoff seconded, to approve the project with staff's recommendations and the addition of condition #7 - that the garage match in architectural character and detailing with the existing building, subject to review and approval by the Department of Planning and Community Development. Mr. Glenn stated the gravel drive would treat the building as a historical feature. Mr. Sorenson asked him to fashion an amendment to the motion for an additional condition. Mr. Hanson stated that, even though other projects have been required to pave the parking lot, he concurred with the historic character of the structure. However, he continued, the existing structures were built away from other structures at the time. He noted the town has evolved around them providing a different character. He stated this part of town will be built up with other projects and he would not like to have others follow with gravel surfacing of parking lots. Mr. Glenn stated curb and gutter and asphalt creat a non-porous surface. Ms. Smith stated the building was not being used in its historical capacity, it would be used for manufacturing retail and industrial. She stated that a business with a commercial parking lot is a challenge when surfaced with gravel and suggested large trucks would tear up the gravel. MOTION: Mr. Glenn moved to amend the motion to recommend the applicant replace the asphalt surface with a gravel surface to fit the historical character of the neighborhood. The motion died due to the lack of a second. The original motion carried 7-1 with Mr. Glenn voting against the motion. C. Walton Homestead Subdivision Concept PUD - #Z-02004 - (Kozub) 1503 Durston Road * A Concept PUD Plan Review to develop 35.375 acres into a mixed-use residential, professional offices, and commercial condominium Planned Unit Development. Gene Cook, Bill Hanson, Jerry Taylor, and Kevin Cook joined the DRB. Planner Skelton presented the Staff Report, noting the location is between the mobile home parks to the west and the potential site of the County jail and the Gallatin County Rest Home to the east. He stated the proposal was a PUD because it included 6-plexes and Walton Way as a private street. Bill Hanson gave a slide presentation. He stated there are two key issues, the open space and pedestrian access from south and north of the site. He stated Rose Park is the largest, nearest park to the site. He stated the adjacent area to the east is open agricultural land. He noted the Walton project would continue pedestrian access to the Bridger Peaks Town Center to the City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 7 r Y4 t xT"^ A v northwest. He stated the proposal is for a condo area, apartment, office and mixed-use area at the north end. He noted North 15`h Avenue would bisect the site, and noted they propose a bend in the street to create buildable lots. He stated the applicant proposed the project to be completed in 3 phases, with phase three being the commercial north end of the property. He described the connecting streets to be installed between Durston Road and Oak Street. He indicated the pedestrian access corridor throughout the complex. He described the right-of- way widths. He stated the public park was intended as a private pocket park for use of the residents near Juniper Street. He stated the intent of the meandering walkways is to get to the park. Ms. Noel asked for clarification on the public park shown in Juniper Street. Planner Skelton stated Juniper Street is the only east-west street between Durston Road and Oak Street. Ms. Noel stated overall the concept was strong, and she noted she had a sense that the land was densely packed with buildings. She stated she liked the idea of the central park, the mixed uses, and the way the nodes connect. Ms. Smith stated the project was a good example of infill, however she stated it was too dense. She would like to see one or two larger areas of park land instead of the smaller parks. She stated the applicant should anticipate that Juniper Street would go through from North 7" Avenue to North 11" Avenue. She suggested two one-acre improved parks with smaller parks in between. She noted she was concerned about the access from Durston Road as there were no turn lanes. She stated the trails should continue without passing through a parking lot. She stated she was concerned with the length of the parking lots for safety reasons. Mr. Pohl stated he would prefer a larger consolidated park space. He noted he preferred a stronger sense of neighborhood identity and liked the way the trail cuts through the condo area. He suggested the inclusion of a pedestrian crossing at North 15'Avenue/Durston Road. He noted the nodes and the sense of identity of the neighborhood were well done. He stated the project would be better if it included more park space. He was concerned that the linear pathway system was interrupted. Ms. Wills asked about the existing home site and if it was the only existing homesite. Mr. Hanson stated the existing site shown is not owned by the applicant and would stay, however, he noted two homesites would be removed. He stated one house will be moved and the other destroyed. Ms. Wills asked if the trail system connects to the Gallatin County Rest Home. Mr. Hanson noted it didn't, but could. Ms. Wills asked if the trailer park is integrated with the project. Mr. Hanson stated an existing fence and a ditch provide a barrier. He stated the ditch will be re-routed closer to the property line. Mr. Cook stated the trailer park people have indicated a wooden fence would be a possibility between the trailer park and the site. Ms. Wills asked if North 14`h Avenue will be installed during the third phase even though it is located in the county. She suggested shifting the public park to allow the development of Juniper Street. She suggested locating a pocket park in the other sector. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12,2002 8 ,r Mr. Raznoff stated he would support several parks instead of one big park. He suggested the trails connect the parks with the trails continuing through the park. He stated the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board had suggested a more formal walking trail along the west side of the site. Mr. Hanson stated the reality is that North 15`h Avenue was the main access to and thru the site. He stated the meandering trails on the property are designed to be private, but to get from point A to point B, North 15`h Avenue will be the main street. He suggested landscaped berms be added as a buffer. Mr. Glenn stated he disagreed with members of the Board who have suggested a large dedication of park land. He stated the proposal was for very low suburban density without a suburban typology. He noted as an infill project it should have twice the density. He stated he had a general feeling that the site has too much of what had already been seen, and suggested the project had a high concentration of the same building type. He stated the commercial portion has a suburban feel not urban. He agreed that the lots along Oak Street were good commercial lots. He suggested twisting the buildings to align them with the street and align the commercial structures with Oak Street. Planning Director Epple stated that, according to the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, the south side of Oak Street was intended for residential uses while the north side should have commercial uses. Mr. Glenn suggested the residential uses be located above office or retail uses. Chairperson Sorenson stated there are three cultures in the proposed development. He stated there should be mixing of the developments possibly. He would like to see pocket parks but a couple of larger nodes for parks should be included. He suggested using the ditch as an amenity. Mr. Hanson stated it handles the storm run off from Durston Road. He noted it formerly was an irrigation ditch and has been abandoned. D. StoneRidge Center MaSP/COA - #Z-02001 —(Caroline) 2002, 2040, 2055, 2011 North 22nd Avenue * A Major Site Plan Application to develop 2.27 acres into four single level, multi-tenant office buildings, and necessary site improvements. MOTION: Mr. Pohl moved, Mr. Glenn seconded, to continue the review of application#Z- 02001 to Tuesday, February 19, 2002. The motion carried unanimously. F. Design Objectives Plan Update — (Saunders) * Review Design Objectives Plan Update. To be continued. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 9 G. Zone Code Amendments - (Saunders) 1 of a 2 week review. * Review Zone Code Amendments. To be continued. ITEM 4. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Raznoff seconded to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Henry Sorenson, Jr. Chairperson City of Bozeman Design Review Board City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12,2002 10 ATTACHMENT C dog soz CITY OF BOZEMAN U 9� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street 7e�,r 1883 p?'�° Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406) 582-2363 co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE FROM: SUSAN KOZUB,ASSISTANT PLANNER RE: WALTON HOMESTEAD CONCEPT PUD AND PREAPPLICATION PLAN REVIEW DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 2002 The Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the pre-application plan review for Walton Homestead PUD Subdivision, and as a result offers the following comments for consideration. 1. The applicant shall submit a zoning application for Preliminary PUD Plan Review of this subdivision phase concurrently with the preliminary plat application. The application shall include a Developmental Manual including architectural and landscape guidelines to implement the development of the mixed-use residential/professional office building planned unit development. 2. A full Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement will be required with the preliminary plat application. 3. The issue of compensation for parkland and/or common open space through a previous agreement with the City of Bozeman must be addressed prior to submitting for preliminary plat review of said subdivision. Portions of the Juniper Street right-of-way located to the west of the intersection with North 15"'Avenue may be used for parkland and/or common open space in the interim, but may not be used in satisfying the required parkland/open space calculations, unless the City Commission grants said authorization. The open space requirement for this project shall be approximately: [Total acreage—r/w] multiplied by 30%: [35.38—4.9] * 0.30 30.48 * 0.30 9.14 acres 4. Storm-water retention ponds shall not make up more than 1/3 of the frontage along Oak Street or Durston Road. The landscape guidelines for the PUD shall require all retention ponds located in required yard setbacks and common open space area to be designed as a landscape feature with a slope not exceeding 1:4 or 25%, with a maximum depth of not more than one and one-half(1 %z) feet. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 5. A one (1) foot wide "No Access" stripe for all lots fronting onto Durston Road and Oak Street shall be noted accordingly on the final plat. 6. The setbacks for Blocks 1 through 4 are as follows: 20' front setback along all public streets including 15`h Street, 14`' Street, and Juniper. Note that the required setback for Oak Street is 50' and the required setback for Durston Road is 25'. The east boundary (exclusive of 10' Street) and the west boundary of the subject property shall have rear yard setbacks of 20'. There are no side-yard setbacks according to the current configuration of blocks. 7. Walton Way will require a 30' utility/access easement exclusive of the boulevard and sidewalks. 8. With the preliminary plan, we will require a profile of all street sections showing the placement of streets,boulevards, sidewalks, etc. 9. The drive access (ie Block 1, Phase 2) is required to be 24'. A 30' Utility/Access Easement is required for this drive access. 10. A Traffic Impact Analysis will be required as set forth in the Subdivision Regulations and outlined by the Department of Engineering. 11. Street names shall be verified by the County Road Office. 12. Covenants, restrictions, and articles of incorporation for the creation of Homeowner's/Property Owner's Association documents shall be submitted with the preliminary plat application and shall contain,but not be limited to, provisions for assessment and maintenance, repair and upkeep of roads, sidewalks, emergency access, common areas , parkland / open space areas, trails, snow removal, and other areas common to the association. 13. Street lighting is currently being required with residential subdivisions to ensure adequate street lighting throughout subdivisions. This may, or may not, be an issue with this subdivision during preliminary plat review. 14. During preliminary plan review,the applicant shall specify the number and type of dwelling units. 15. If the applicant is requesting a reduced front yard setback for the moving of the existing home at the corner of Durston and the proposed North 15`h Street, it must be specifically requested in writing with the preliminary plat application. This also includes any request for relaxation of any additional zoning and/or subdivision regulatory standards. FURTHER COMMENTS AND ADVICE MAY BE PROVIDED WITH THE WRITTEN SUMMARY- REVIEW LETTER BASED ON ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PROVIDED BY OTHER APPLICABLE REVIEW AGENCIES. Page 2 • • ATTACHMENT D Boz THE CITY OF BOZEMAN U9� 20 E. OLIVE • P.O. BOX 1230 * BOZEMAN, MONTANA 5977 1-1 230 le ~88 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 9?'jN Co. PHONE: (406) 582-2380 • FAX: (406)582-2363 February 4, 2002 To: Development Review Committee From: Bob Murray, Project Engineer �rLA Re: Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD Pre-Ap - nP-02001 Walton Homestead Subdivision Concept PUD - "Z-02004 The following comments should be incorporated into the preliminary plat application for this subdivision: 1. An access permit will need to be obtained from the Montana Department of Transportation for the intersection of Oak and 15th Avenue, and the permit should be verified for 14th Avenue. 2. This developer will be required to install one additional lane, including chip seal, striping, curb, gutter and sidewalk along the length of the Oak Street frontage. 3. A traffic analysis will need to be prepared to examine the effects of the subdivision on adjoining intersections, and all identified improvements installed as part of this subdivision. 4. Capacities in the existing sewer main will need to be verified as part of the plan submittal for the project. An easement will need to be granted for the existing 18" sewer main as part of this project. 5. The existing irrigation ditch will need to be relocated where it conflicts with the building i envelope on the proposed lots. This carries stormwater runoff from Durston which must be perpetuated. An easement must be granted for the storm drain pipe which comes off of Durston at this location. 6. The preliminary plat application should include a preliminary stromwater plan. cc: ERF Project File HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK • • ATTACHMENT E of BOZO, CITY OF BOZEMAN U 'y� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582 2360 <<1T 1883 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 co. t" Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 worldwide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Andy Epple, Dave Skelton, Susan Kozub FROM: Don Grund DATE: January 23, 2002 RE: Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Direction on Parkland Dedication As requested,I have reviewed the 2020 Plan to see what new.direction regarding parkland dedication is offered. The following analysis is based on this review. The 2020 Plan gives clear direction on parkland acquisitions and evaluation criteria for accepting parkland through the subdivision PUD processes. The 2020 Plan recognizes the need to change the method by which the city provides for the recreational needs of the community. Most of the discussion on parkland dedication is found in Chapter 9, "Parks,Recreation,Pathways; and Open Space." Of particular interest is the discussion on the changes needed in parkland dedication by subdivisions which is found in Section 9.1.6. Parkland Acquisition which states, "Acquisition of land for future park sites is vital to insure the availability of land for park development as the growing community demands new facilities. Parkland dedication in subdivisions should only be accepted when the land is well located, is needed for the overall park and recreation program,*and is physically suited for park and recreation use. Cash-in-lieu payments, land trades, or off-site park dedications should be considered if necessary to obtain centrally located land or land adjacent to existing parks. " (pg 9-9) The 2020 Plan also directs that future dedication of parkland through subdivision should consider the need for usable park areas that accommodate "active recreation". Direction is also given that careful evaluation should be given before accepting land that is not suited for development of facilities associated with active recreation. This discussion is found on page 9-10 and states, "An important factor to consider when approving parkland dedications is the lack of usable active recreation park areas. There is an increasing demand for multipurpose fields of varying kinds, and a corresponding shortage of these facilities. Consideration must be given to the development of These facilities. Therefore, acceptance ofparkland dedications unsuitable for this type of development must be carefully evaluated to ensure adequate supplies of land suitable for active development." More dialogue on parkland dedication can be found in Section 9.2.2. "Parkland Aggregation and Consolidation." This section analyzes past parkland dedication practices and concludes these practices have led to a fragmented park system where many parks are too small to be used for organized recreational activities. The 2020 Plan recommends the restructuring of acquisition procedures so that functional parks are provided.This section also calls for the establishment of evaluation criteria with respect to size, access, location,and so forth,to help decide when a proposed dedication should be accepted.It should be noted that evaluation criteria for acceptable parkland dedications already exist in the 1997 Bozeman Area Recreation, Parks, Open Space and Trails Master Plan in Section 4100. Since the 1997 POST Master Plan was adopted and incorporated as an element of the 2020 Plan,the parkland dedication evaluation criteria of the 1997 Master Plan can be used in current subdivision reviews. The evaluation criteria contained in the 1997 Master Plan emphasizes that the tract of land to be dedicated as parkland will be located in such a way to clearly provide both physical and visible public access, and will be adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed recreational use. The 2020 Plan does not offer evaluation criteria for determining if a trail system should be considered a recreation amenity(thereby satisfying parkland dedication) or a transportation facility.Myview on this issue is that a pedestrian system that transverses a substantial open space or park should be considered a recreational facility. A pedestrian system that simply provides access to and from a parking lot and between buildings should not be considered for parkland dedication. The objectives, and implementation policies related to parkland dedication in the 2020 Plan are listed bellow. Objective 2.Undertake regulatory reform to enable the creation of larger, more functional parks in proximity to population centers. Implementation Policies: 56) Coordinate with landowners to assemble and site community parks, as defined herein, which are centrally located and easily accessible to increase and maximize recreational possibilities. 57) Revise local subdivision regulations to support off-site parkland dedication or other means of aggregating parkland. 75) Prepare and adopt clear criteria to determine when pedestrian and bicycle facilities are primarily transportation improvements or recreational facilities. 76) Prepare and adopt design, construction, and maintenance standards for pedestrian and bicycle transportation improvements versus recreational facilities. • ATTACHMENT F so P.� 814 N. 3CZEMAN AVE. P.O. EOX 1230 BOZEtAAN, MONTANA 597'71-1230 a t PHONE (406) 5+7.2-3200 FA;, (406) 582-3201 C]Tf SHCP COMPLEX ie EIC. E SY To: Don Grund, Urban Designer&Dave Foltz, En 'neer CITY NLM c4ING From: Mike Certalic, Water/Sewer Superintendent Date: January 17, 2002 Re: Walton Homestead Subdivision Concept PUD Pre Approval • The existing 10"ductile water main in 1530 Durston Road will require two full pavement cuts as the main is on the south side of Durston. • The 14" ductile water main in Oak Street will require one full pavement cut as the main is on the north side of Oak. • The as builts for Oak Street improvement show an 8" stub from the 14"main in Oak Street on the 14th alignment. If this stub does not fit the proposed infrastructure an additional tap in Oak Street will.be required. • An impact study on the 18" clay tile sewer shown on the preliminary plat should be provided. . • The water and sanitary sewer sketched on the preliminary plat concept plan application will require some modifications i.e. location of sanitary sewer and water main to detention areas, placement of water main per City of Bozeman standard. • if water and sanitary infrastructure installation is scheduled with phasing design and.access must comply with City of Bozeman standards. • This department will review engineered plans when they are provided. MC/md HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK iATTACHMENT G FFCFIVE'D BY JAN 2 ' 2M FROM: Bill Kayser Assistant Director of Public Safety CITY PLANNING TO: Susan Kozub Assistant Planner DATE: January 21, 2002 RE: Walton Homestead MiSub PUD Pre-Application Plat #P-02001 Dear Susan: The ever-increasing population and land area that is coming under the jurisdiction of the City of Bozeman, and, specifically, the Department of Public Safety, does raise several concerns: 1. The Bozeman Police Department will be able to provide service to this area, but, as with any other area of the City, calls for service will be prioritized as to the type of police response due to resource availability. 2. This development will have an impact on traffic flows at the intersection of 15th. and West Durston and Walton Way and West Durston, namely, increase in the number of traffic units that will be entering and crossing West Durston. There is a strong probability that some type of traffic control device will be needed at 15th. and West Durston to allow safe crossing and turn maneuvers at that location. 3. Fire response time should be adequate, however, with the ever increasing jurisdictional area that is under their protection, their resources, both in equipment and manpower are being stretched to the maximum. 4. Adequate lighting will need to be addressed for the intersections involved, as well as all the pedestrian paths and parking lots. If you need anything else, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bill Kayser Assistant Director of Public Safety ATTACHMENT H To: Dave Skelton Susan Kozub Department of Planning and Community Development From: Anne Banks Subdivision Review Committee, Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Re: Walton Homestead PUD/Subdivision Date: January 28,2002 Dave: Thanks for meeting with us on Friday and clarifying some of the points regarding this PUD/Subdivision. It appears that as a PUD it would have an open space requirement of 30%, while as a subdivision it will have a park dedication requirement of 5.5 acres, based on the number of dwelling units per acre. In view of the density of the development and the lack of usable parkland near it—the nearest park is Kirk Park—the Recreation and Parks Advisory board strongly recommends the dedication of parkland. An area on the southwest side seems most suitable, since it would be close to the housing phases. The future Juniper Street right-of- way should not be considered part of the required 5.5 acres. Since North 15'h will become a major arterial between the high school and the Bridger Peaks Town Center,it is desirable to have a trail as a connector, particularly since a trail along the Walton Creek/Ditch corridor is planned for Bridger Peaks and the Lowe's Home Improvement development immediately to its north. The trail could be used by the. high school cross country runners for training as well as by the rest of the community. For future reference,it would be helpful to have a policy statement defining"usable open space" and requiring that open space dedications be usable. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. ,BAN 2 8 7007 CITY BUZZ, • 10 THE CITY OF BOZEMAN 411 E. MAIN ST. P.O. BOX 640 PHONE (406) 586-3321 * t BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715-0640 co FE� C'N PANNING To' Dave Skelton- Susan Kozub Department of Planning and Community Development From: Anne Banks Subdivision Review Committee, Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Re: Walton Homestead PUD/Subdivision Date: January 28, 2002 Dave: Thanks for meeting with us on Friday and clarifying some of the points regarding this PUD/Subdivision. It appears that as a PUD it would have an open space requirement of 30%, while as a subdivision it will have a park dedication requirement of 5.5 acres, based on the number of dwelling units per acre. In view of the density of the development and the lack of usable parkland near it—the nearest park is Kirk Park—the Recreation and Parks Advisory board strongly recommends the dedication of parkland. An area on the southwest side seems most suitable, since it would be close to the housing phases. The future Juniper Street right-of- way should not be considered part of the required 5.5 acres. Since North 15`' will become a major arterial between the high school and the Bridger Peaks Town Center, it is desirable to have a trail as a connector, particularly since a trail along the Walton Creek/Ditch corridor is planned for Bridger Peaks and the Lowe's Home Improvement development immediately to its north. The trail could be used by the high school cross country runners for training as well as by the rest of the community. For future reference, it would be helpful to have a policy statement defining "usable open space" and requiring that open space dedications be usable. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. • ATTACHMENT I Gallatin Valley Land 'Trust February 4,2002 Dave Skelton and Susan Kozub City of Bozeman, Department of Planning and Community Development 20 E. Olive,P. 0. Box 1230 Bozeman Montana 59771-1230 Re: Walton Homestead P.U.D. t "� Dear Dave and Susan: I have reviewed the Walton Homestead P.U.D. Concept Plan Submittal, and would like to make several suggestions and comments. An unbroken trail corridor should be planned along the project's western boundary from Durston Road to Oak Street. This corridor should be a least 25 feet wide and contain a primary trail at least 5 feet wide. Secondary trails should be planned to connect this primary trail with the Public Park and residential and commercial areas within the project. A primary trail from Durston to Oak Street would provide non-motorized access from Walton Homestead, local schools, and surrounding neighborhoods to commercial developments, existing trails, and planned trails north of Oak Street. The Walton Homestead trail corridor would connect with a planned trail corridor along the Walton Creek/Ditch adjacenf,to the Bridger Peaks Town Center and the Lowe's Home Improvement development. The Walton Creek/Ditch trail corridor begins on the north side of Oak Street adjacent to the northwest corner of Walton Homestead. In addition, an existing paved boulevard trail along Oak Street also begins at the northwest comer of Walton Homestead and ends near the post office at Baxter Lane. + Finally,the dedicated Public Park appears to include the Juniper Street right-of-way. If and when this right-of-way is developed as a paved street,the park will be fragmented and greatly reduced in size. The Public Park should not be located on this right-of-way, and should be moved farther south to be centrally located among the Multi-Family residences. Thank you for ortunity to comment. Sinc ely, ary ode rail Program Coordinator P.O. Box 7o31 ■ Bozeman, ?Montana 59771-7021 0 406-387-8404 ■ Fax =406- 582-4136 s www.plt.org r •arlr:i rri.•r !. ATTACHMENT J Montana Department of Transportation David A.Galt, Director Judy Martz,Governor Bozeman Area Office 907 N Rouse Avenue PO Box 1110 Bozeman,MT 59771-1110 January 24, 2002 CITY PLANNING Carol L. Schott, Administrative Secretary City of Bozeman Plmndng P.O. Box 640 Bozeman,MT 59771-0640 Subject: Walton Homestead MiSub PUD Pre-Application Plat#P-02001 and Zoning PUD Concept Plan#Z-0004 Carol, I received the information on the above mentioned subdivision and offer the following comments. This subdivision does not directly access any MDT routes, so at this time I do not have any issues with the development. I If you need further assistance, feel free to contact me at 586-9562. a i Douglas D. Moeller,Maintenance Chief j Bozeman Maintenance Area I 1 copies: File I i Phone: (406)586-9562 An Equal Opportunity Employer TTY. (800)335-7592 Fax: (406)586-5202 Web Page: www.mdtstate.mt.us SUE S(KIN, PARKS& REC CITY OI *jZEM' AN ADV: Y BOARD': DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND w1VAITZ%l.... V � ' * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 ♦0 Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net CO Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM --- �,� ."d TO: Mike Redburn or Gary Griffith, Bozeman School District Pat Byorth or Kurt Alt, Fish, Wildlife, and Parks 7 Doug Moeller, MDT, Bozeman Division /_;�EIVED lC-� Wendy Williams, Natural Resources Conservation Service ' BY Ann Banks, Parks &Recreation Advisory Board ` ,Sue Harkin, Parks & Recreation Advisory_Board. FEB 0 7 2002 Mark Tymrak, Director of Public Safety CITY PLANNING Ralph Zimmer, Pedestrian &Public Safety Committee, TCC FROM: Carol L. Schott Administrative Secretary RE: Walton Homestead MiSub PUD Pre-Application Plat#P-02001 and Zoning PUD Concept Plan #Z-02004 DATE: January 15, 2002 Attached you will find the pre-application and zoning PUD Concept plan applications for the proposed Minor Subdivision PUD referenced above to develop 35.375 acres into 4 lots for residential and commercial condominium uses. The property is legally described as being Lots 1-4, C.O.S. 2085 and that parcel described in Book 144, Page 373, located in the SW'/4 of Section 1, T12, R5E of PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and is located at 1503 Durston Road. Please review the attached information and provide comments to this office no later than Tuesday, February 4, 2002. The proposed subdivision PUD and concept plan will be discussed by the Development Review Committee on January 29th and February 5th at 10:00 a.m. The proposed zoning Concept PUD will be discussed by the Design Review Board at 3:30 p.m. on February 12th. The meetings will be held in the downstairs Conference Room, Alfred Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street. You are welcome and encouraged to attend these meetings. If you are unable to respond in writing by the above deadline or if you have questions or concerns regarding the application, we ask that you contact Assistant Planner Susan Kozub at 582-2360 Thank you for your cooperation. CLS/cls Attachments planning- zoning - subdivision review -'annexation - historic prefervation - housing - grant administration - neighborhood coordination 0 TAY L O R • HANSON KA N E A R C H I T E C T S February 11, 2002 f EC IVED BY Robin Sullivan FEB 12 2002 Clerk of Commission Bozeman City Hall CITY PLANNING 311 E. Main Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Walton Homestead Concept P.U.D. Dear Robin: We are currently in the concept review phase for the Walton Homestead P.U.D. In discussions with planning staff, it was suggested we make a presentation to the City Commission to provide general information on the project and receive preliminary feedback. Please schedule an appointment for us to present our concept plan to the Commission. We will keep our presentation to 15 minutes, and hope to engage the Commission in discussion about the project. Your help with this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, William A. Hanson, AIA Cc: Susan Kozub, Bozeman Planning Office Gene Cook Kevin Cook Jim McLean 101 E.MAIN-STUDIO ONE • BOZEMAN, MT 59715 • PHN:406/586/7020 - FAX:406/586/8A70 • WWW.THK•ARCHITECTS.COM Message Page 1 of 1 Susan Kozub From: Clark Johnson Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:02 AM To: Ron Brey; Susan Kozub Cc: Tim Cooper Subject: RE: Parkland Credit&Walton Homestead -Yes. yes. -----Original Message----- From: Ron Brey Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:09 PM To: Susan Kozub Cc: Clark Johnson; Tim Cooper Subject: RE: Parkland Credit&Walton Homestead I don't recall that our discussion was as precise as "half' but rather that we would look for a reasonable amount of credit that would acknowledge the value of Gene's dedication without overly compromising the character of the new development. Half is probably as good as anything else. I had also run some statutory language in MCA by Tim that could be thinly construed to make this defensible even though the agreement has expired. Clark? Tim? In sum, fine by me. -----Original Message----- From: Susan Kozub Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:41 PM To: Clark Johnson; Ron Brey Cc: Andy Epple Subject: Parkland Credit&Walton Homestead According to the "Certificate of Dedication for Park,"Tract GL-3, Gene Cook dedicated 6.159 acres to the City for Parkland in 1984. Andy recalls from a conversation a few weeks ago that we are to give him "credit"for half of that dedication (3.1 acres) in light of the Park Land Agreement ending in 1997. Please confirm. Thank you. Susan K. Kozub Assistant Planner qb�@tozeman.net PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 406-582-2360 406-582-2363fax 2/25/02 building exactly with the same roof pitch and siding. Chairperson Sorenson stated he was in favor of the project. Mr. Glenn stated the asphalt drive in front of the building would look odd. He stated his main concern was the overall look of the project, including the landscaping around the project, the forefront, and the standard ground scape. He stated he didn't agree with the requirement for asphalt and suggested a gravel driveway. Planner Grund stated the Historic Preservation Planner Jim Jenks had stated the project would be appropriate with the historical aspects of the site and neighborhood. He stated conditions are suggested which would require the site be brought up to modern standards. He stated the City Engineer has additional conditions pertaining to curb and gutter. MOTION: Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Raznoff seconded, to approve the project with staff's recommendations and the addition of condition #7 - that the garage match in architectural character and detailing with the existing building, subject to review and approval by the Department of Planning and Community Development. Mr. Glenn stated the gravel drive would treat the building as a historical feature. Mr. Sorenson asked him to fashion an amendment to the motion for an additional condition. Mr. Hanson stated that, even though other projects have been required to pave the parking lot, he concurred with the historic character of the structure. However, he continued, the existing structures were built away from other structures at the time. He noted the town has evolved around them providing a different character. He stated this part of town will be built up with other projects and he would not like to have others follow with gravel surfacing of parking lots. Mr. Glenn stated curb and gutter and asphalt creat a non-porous surface. Ms. Smith stated the building was not being used in its historical capacity, it would be used for manufacturing retail and industrial. She stated that a business with a commercial parking lot is a challenge when surfaced with gravel and suggested large trucks would tear up the gravel. MOTION: Mr. Glenn moved to amend the motion to recommend the applicant replace the asphalt surface with a gravel surface to fit the historical character of the neighborhood. The motion died due to the lack of a second. The original motion carried 7-1 with Mr. Glenn voting against the motion. C. Walton Homestead Subdivision Concept PUD - #Z-02004 — (Kozub) lor 1503 Durston Road * A Concept PUD Plan Review to develop 35.375 acres into a mixed-use City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 4 • • residential, professional offices, and commercial condominium Planned Unit Development. Gene Cook, Bill Hanson, Jerry Taylor, and Kevin Cook joined the DRB. Planner Skelton presented the Staff Report, noting the location is between the mobile home parks to the west and the potential site of the County jail and the Gallatin County Rest Home to the east. He stated the proposal was a PUD because it included 6-plexes and Walton Way as a private street. Bill Hanson gave a slide presentation. He stated there are two key issues, the open space and pedestrian access from south and north of the site. He stated Rose Park is the largest, nearest park to the site. He stated the adjacent area to the east is open agricultural land. He noted the Walton project would continue pedestrian access to the Bridger Peaks Town Center to the northwest. He stated the proposal is for a condo area, apartment, office and mixed-use area at the north end. He noted North 15" Avenue would bisect the site, and noted they propose a bend in the street to create buildable lots. He stated the applicant proposed the project to be completed in 3 phases, with phase three being the commercial north end of the property. He described the connecting streets to be installed between Durston Road and Oak Street. He indicated the pedestrian access corridor throughout the complex. He described the right-of- way widths. He stated the public park was intended as a private pocket park for use of the residents near Juniper Street. He stated the intent of the meandering walkways is to get to the park. Ms. Noel asked for clarification on the public park shown in Juniper Street. Planner Skelton stated Juniper Street is the only east-west street between Durston Road and Oak Street. Ms. Noel stated overall the concept was strong, and she noted she had a sense that the land was densely packed with buildings. She stated she liked the idea of the central park, the mixed uses, and the way the nodes connect. Ms. Smith stated the project was a good example of infill, however she stated it was too dense. She would like to see one or two larger areas of park land instead of the smaller parks. She stated the applicant should anticipate that Juniper Street would go through from North 7' Avenue to North 11" Avenue. She suggested two one-acre improved parks with smaller parks in between. She noted she was concerned about the access from Durston Road as there were no turn lanes. She stated the trails should continue without passing through a parking lot. She stated she was concerned with the length of the parking lots for safety reasons. Mr. Pohl stated he would prefer a larger consolidated park space. He noted he preferred a stronger sense of neighborhood identity and liked the way the trail cuts through the condo area. He suggested the inclusion of a pedestrian crossing at North 15'Avenue/Durston Road. He noted the nodes and the sense of identity of the neighborhood were well done. He stated the project would be better if it included more park space. He was concerned that the linear pathway system was interrupted. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12,2002 5 • r Ms. Wills asked about the existing home site and if it was the only existing homesite. Mr. Hanson stated the existing site shown is not owned by the applicant and would stay, however, he noted two homesites would be removed. He stated one house will be moved and the other destroyed. Ms. Wills asked if the trail system connects to the Gallatin County Rest Home. Mr. Hanson noted it didn't, but could. Ms. Wills asked if the trailer park is integrated with the project. Mr. Hanson stated an existing fence and a ditch provide a barrier. He stated the ditch will be re-routed closer to the property line. Mr. Cook stated the trailer park people have indicated a wooden fence would be a possibility between the trailer park and the site. Ms. Wills asked if North 14' Avenue will be installed during the third phase even though it is located in the county. She suggested shifting the public park to allow the development of Juniper Street. She suggested locating a pocket park in the other sector. Mr. Raznoff stated he would support several parks instead of one big park. He suggested the trails connect the parks with the trails continuing through the park. He stated the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board had suggested a more formal walking trail along the west side of the site. Mr. Hanson stated the reality is that North 15`h Avenue was the main access to and thru the site. He stated the meandering trails on the property are designed to be private, but to get from point A to point B, North 15' Avenue will be the main street. He suggested landscaped berms be added as a buffer. Mr. Glenn stated he disagreed with members of the Board who have suggested a large dedication of park land. He stated the proposal was for very low suburban density without a suburban typology. He noted as an infill project it should have twice the density. He stated he had a general feeling that the site has too much of what had already been seen, and suggested the project had a high concentration of the same building type. He stated the commercial portion has a suburban feel not urban. He agreed that the lots along Oak Street were good commercial lots. He suggested twisting the buildings to align them with the street and align the commercial structures with Oak Street. Planning Director Epple stated that, according to the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, the south side of Oak Street was intended for residential uses while the north side should have commercial uses. Mr. Glenn suggested the residential uses be located above office or retail uses. Chairperson Sorenson stated there are three cultures in the proposed development. He stated there should be mixing of the developments possibly. He would like to see pocket parks but a couple of larger nodes for parks should be included. He suggested using the ditch as an amenity. Mr. Hanson stated it handles the storm run off from Durston Road. He noted it formerly was an irrigation ditch and has been abandoned. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12,2002 6 04 soz CITY OF BOZEMAN ti� �rx DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406)582-2360. = = 20 East Olive Street 1883 '�e Fax: (406)582-2363 �r�� o� Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeinan.net co Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net Gene Cook Oakway, LLC 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite101 Bozeman, MT 59715 February 25, 2002 Dear Gene, We have scheduled the Walton Homestead Concept PUD and Subdivision Pre-Application to informally go before the City Commission on Monday, March 11, 2002 at 3 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room. Please call if you have any questions. Th nk you, Susan Kozub CC: Taylor, Hanson, Kane Architects, 101 East Main St., Studio One,Bozeman, MT 59715 Rocky Mountain Engineers, 1700 West Koch Street, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59715 t • •r�s.. 4 �" tti � DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002 MINUTES ITEM I. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE The DRB meeting for February 12, 2002 was called to order at 3:35 p.m. by Chairperson Henry Sorenson. Jennifer Willems, the recording secretary, noted the attendance. MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Henry Sorenson Don Grund, Associate Planner Bill Hanson Susan Kozub, Assistant Planner Dan Glenn Karin Caroline, Assistant Planner Joanne Noel Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Dick Pohl Jennifer Willems, Recording Secretary Dawn Smith Nichole Wills Jim Raznoff Visitors Present Tom Simkins Rusty Vandivor Chris Nixon Shaw Thompson Nate Thompson Matthew Killian Mark Chandler Elizabeth Clifford Dick Prugh Gene Cook Susan Swimley David Kautz Dave Guetig Lee Hutahn ITEM 2. MINUTES OF JANUARY 29, 2002 Chairperson Henry Sorenson called for additions or changes to the minutes. Mr. Pohl noted a change on page 2. Mr. Pohl moved, Mr. Hanson seconded,to approve the minutes as amended.. The agenda was rearranged to place the Home Depot review first. E. Home Depot MaSP/COA/Dev - #Z-02011 - (Caroline) NW corner of North 19' Avenue and Tschache Lane A Major Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness and a deviation to develop a large regional commercial area to include the Home Depot Home Improvement Retail Center and related site improvements on 16+ acres within Phase IV of Stoneridge PUD, which consists of a total of 52.65 acres. Lowell Springer, Dave Kautz, Dave Guetig, and Susan Swimley joined the DRB. Assistant Planner Karin Caroline reviewed the staff report. She stated that MDT has approved right turn in and right turn out only for the North 19' Avenue ingress/egress. She reported there would City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 • • P'^�, q,�y_p �.,`l.� )' :�. bpi � be a signal installed at the intersection of Tschache Lane and North 19"'Avenue. She indicated on the site plan where the applicant had addressed recommendations made by the DRB during the informal review. She stated the applicant is requesting a deviation for the height of the main peaked roof entrance. Mr. Springer, applicant's architect and representative, presented a different plan with a modified back area, and he stated it was conceptually the same plan as the one in the submittal. He stated the entire site would consist of the Home Depot structure, with space for two other building pads. He noted he felt the concern of the DRB during the informal review was the building's orientation. He described the back of the building as utilitarian with a private area by the creek for employees. Mr. Kautz stated they have added canopies over the windows and extended the roof line to enhance the elevations due to the requests of the DRB. Mr. Springer suggested one does not see the full width of the box-like building as it is buffered by the 50'greenway corridor. Mr. Springer stated there are several pedestrian access points. He stated they are working with MDT on traffic control and parking. Mr. Kautz stated they have reduced the building size to 95,000 sq ft. with 331 parking spaces with landscaping. He noted Home Depot will share parking with the two future developments with no additional parking to be provided. Planner Caroline stated the project was reviewed under the North 19" Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. Director Epple stated the applicants would not be required to amend the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. He noted that, following consultation with the legal staff on the need for a Master Plan Amendment, an amendment was not necessary for this application. Therefore, the Master Plan Amendment was withdrawn. Mr. Glenn stated he was concerned with the general idea of the entryway corridor becoming a series of big box stores. He stated the applicant has responded to design concerns. He asked about the top of the columns on the garden center elevation. He noted he would rather see heavy timbers and fieldstone, and not an articulated capital. Mr. Raznoff stated that he sees improvements on pedestrian access and facade development on all elevations of the building. He stated the intersection near Target is hazardous and the intersection looks as if it will be the same. He stated he would like to hear the rest of the Board's comments, then respond. Mr. Pohl stated he liked the way the pedestrian areas are identified. He suggested the south elevation doesn't match the rest of the building even though it is very prominent. He suggested an additional design element on the southeast corner to balance it with the other corner. In response to Mr. Pohl's question, Planner Caroline stated the monument sign is City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 2 �• !;i.', .;•yam .q R..`._ i} _5 f` . �' ��fFiFi Q7�i rn1 Y,�r :il•e�V'•..'. ^•�� j�, V. shown near the main right in/right out access. Mr. Kautz noted they would welcome suggestions as to where the sign is placed. Mr. Pohl stated the main access will be from Tschache Lane. He noted if the sign is placed near the in/out access, it won't be seen from Tschache Lane. He suggested the sign be placed near the entrance to the lot at Tschache Lane. Mr. Springer stated that Jason Giard of MDT has suggested a sign location which functions from both accesses. Unrelated to the site plan review proceedings, Ms. Smith stated she doesn't feel that regional retail falls under M-1 zoning. She stated that the west side of North 19`h Avenue should serve as a transitional area and not contain retail uses. She stated the amount of parking spaces are over the required number. She stated she does not support the increased number of parking spaces. She noted she had a concern that the landscaping only meets 24 percent of the amount required. Planner Caroline explained the landscaping requirements were addressed in the conditions. In response to Ms. Smith, Planner Caroline stated that snow storage has been talked about and will be relocated. She noted the applicant has met the requirements for buffering the frontage on North 191h Avenue. Planner Caroline stated the garden center is enclosed. She explained the expandable seasonal area. She noted the parking lot lighting meets the City's requirements and mirrors the lighting in other areas of the Stoneridge PUD, though parking lot lighting specifications are not specified in the PUD. She noted the lighting on the west boundary would be a lower light level with no building mounted lights. She noted there is a flag pole light proposed, and some security lighting near the entrances, which shall meet the code. In response to Mr. Hanson, Planner Caroline stated the water feature would be developed as part of this project, as well as two retention ponds. Mr. Hanson explained the graphic is misleading as the stream does not directly connect with the detention pond. Mr. Hanson suggested integrating the stone into the architecture of the building near the downspout areas. He stated overall he appreciated the applicant's attempt to address DRB's concerns. He stated he preferred Home Depot's parking lot design over Target's and Bob Wards' design. He complimented Planner Caroline on her staff report. He stated he was comfortable with the project. Planner Caroline stated the applicant was comfortable with the conditions as listed in the staff report, he and staff have resolved earlier issues. She stated condition number 22 could be eliminated and explained why. Chairperson Sorenson stated he felt the applicant had addressed the requests of the DRB during the informal review. He suggested placing the roof canopies far enough into the interior of the building to prevent a "stuck on" look. He stated the pedestrian trail along the stream corridor felt like it is struggling to find room on the site and become a part of the project. He suggested the stream looks cut off and not in the appropriate place on the site plan. Planner Caroline stated the path needed to be more natural, and the trail shouldn't be pushed to an area for City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 3 yFF�" `ate •{:S �,' r,`,� f� . convenience. Chairperson Sorenson noted the pedestrian path within the parking area should have clear ends that tie into the asphalt trail from the north and south. He suggested the addition of a pedestrian area with benches. He stated the applicant has done a nice job of laying out the site. MOTION: Mr. Raznoff moved, Mr. Pohl seconded, to recommend approval of application #Z-02011 with conditions recommended by staff, except condition#22, which is to be deleted. A condition is to be added which alters the southeast corner canopy of the building to develop a stronger architectural element, another condition to incorporate architectural furniture along the trail at the intersections of the pedestrian pathways and asphalt trail, and a third condition to extend the peaked entry canopies fifteen feet into the building so it becomes a more unified element of the building. And the final condition that the garden center canopy element be moved north to the pedestrian canopy area and integrated into the pedestrian canopy. The motion carried 4-2, with Mr. Pohl, Mr. Hanson, Mr. Raznoff, and Chairperson Sorenson voting yes, and Mr. Glenn and Ms. Smith voting in opposition. ITEM 3. PROJECT REVIEW A. Simkins-Hallin Mendenhall Warehouse MaSP/COA/Dev - #Z-01235 (Grunt) 609 East Mendenhall Avenue * Considerations to modifications to a Major Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness and Deviations to allow the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a 7,500 sf warehouse for building materials and a mechanic shop and related site improvements on property located at 609 East Mendenhall Avenue. Assistant Planner Don Grund stated the Board had initially recommended denial of the project due to the amount of retention on site, the removal of existing trees, concerns about backing from parking spaces into the public right-of-way, and the boulevard landscaping. He stated the applicant has addressed those concerns and the architectural style of the building. Planner Grund stated the applicant has proposed to move the garage door to the west elevation. He reviewed the staff memo. He stated the proposed lighting didn't meet code. Dick Prugh, Mike Chandler, and Elizabeth Clifford, joined the DRB. Mr. Prugh reviewed the changes made, stating they eliminated the garage door on the south side and reviewed the changes proposed for the retention ponds. He stated the existing trees will be saved and six additional trees were proposed. He stated they have changed the lighting and asked DRB to recommend approval of the proposed lighting located over the doors. He displayed samples of the proposed siding. Mr. Hanson asked staff about the previous review. Planner Grund stated the applicant has agreed to install tree grates around the trees in the sidewalk in lieu of a boulevard. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 4 Mr. Hanson stated the building hasn't changed much, and the site is constrained. He noted that overall he doesn't have problems with the architecture. He stated the site is improved by having the materials stored inside the building. He stated the light in the rear of the building is bright. He stated he is in support of the project. Ms. Smith asked about the outdoor light fixture, stating she was opposed to the projection of the proposed light and suggested a wall mounted light would better meet code requirements. Ms. Smith stated she appreciated the changes made. Mr. Pohl stated he supported the newly submitted plan. He stated hemlock was not a hardy species in this area. He noted he was pleased about the landscaped treatment around the site and is in support of the project. Ms. Wills stated she is in support of the project. She noted she would like to see something brighter and different than what is proposed, but is in support of the project as presented. She suggested adding awnings above the windows. Mr. Raznoff stated that he appreciated the design progress and is in support of the project. Mr. Glenn stated he had no comments, as he was not at the last meeting. Chairperson Sorenson stated that the structure is very functional and pedestrian. He would have liked to see more architectural design and the elimination of the deviations. He stated the improvements to the site, including saving the trees, have changed his initial opinion of the project. He stated he is comfortable with the architect working with staff on the lighting concerns. MOTION: Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Pohl seconded, to recommend approval of the project with conditions as identified in the staff report. The motion carried 7-0 with Ms. Noel abstaining. B. Triple T Woodworking PUD - #Z-01244 -(Grunt) 601 East Cottonwood Street * A Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to allow the use of the existing building for a small retail and woodworking op operation, including three caretaker units on the property located at 601 East Cottonwood Street. Nate and Shaw Thompson joined the DRB. Assistant Planner Don Grund presented the staff report. Mr. Hanson asked the applicants if they concurred with staff's conclusions, to which Shaw City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 5 i Thompson stated they did. Mr. Hanson stated he liked the project and that the building was being brought back to life. He noted he liked the colors and stated the project was positive. Ms. Noel stated she was in support of the project. Ms. Smith stated she was confused on the locations for parking and trash collection. Planner Grund explained how the parking was calculated. He stated the three residential units are for the owners and the workers, therefore, there was not a need for as many parking spaces. He proposed the elimination of the proposed parking along Wallace Street. Mr. Shaw Thompson stated they will not have a dumpster as all their refuse will be stored inside. Mr. Pohl stated his concern was with the dumpster and the randomness of the landscape design. Ms. Wills noted she appreciated the historical background included in the project review and noted she was in support of the project. She stated she was confused on the materials to be used. Mr. Nate Thompson explained the materials and presented a picture of the siding. Mr. Raznoff stated he was still confused about where the parking would occur. Planner Grund stated the four stalls in the setback along Wallace Street will be eliminated. Mr. Raznoff then stated he was in support of the project. Mr. Glenn asked if the windows depicted were existing. Mr. Nate Thompson stated the windows were existing and were six panes each. He noted the rear of the building was covered by a warehouse and another building. He stated the new windows were on the rear elevation with double panes containing dividers for energy savings. Mr. Shaw Thompson indicated the windows which would be replaced. Chairperson Sorenson stated there were no elevations for the four car garage so he didn't understand how the garage impacted the site. Mr. Shaw Thompson stated it would match the building exactly with the same roof pitch and siding. Chairperson Sorenson stated he was in favor of the project. Mr. Glenn stated the asphalt drive in front of the building would look odd. He stated his main concern was the overall look of the project, including the landscaping around the project, the forefront, and the standard ground scape. He stated he didn't agree with the requirement for asphalt and suggested a gravel driveway. Planner Grund stated the Historic Preservation Planner Jim Jenks had stated the project would be appropriate with the historical aspects of the site and neighborhood. He stated conditions are suggested which would require the site be brought up to modern standards. He stated the City Engineer has additional conditions pertaining to curb and gutter. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 6 MOTION: Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Raznoff seconded, to approve the project with staff's recommendations and the addition of condition #7 - that the garage match in architectural character and detailing with the existing building, subject to review and approval by the Department of Planning and Community Development. Mr. Glenn stated the gravel drive would treat the building as a historical feature. Mr. Sorenson asked him to fashion an amendment to the motion for an additional condition. Mr. Hanson stated that, even though other projects have been required to pave the parking lot, he concurred with the historic character of the structure. However, he continued, the existing structures were built away from other structures at the time. He noted the town has evolved around them providing a different character. He stated this part of town will be built up with other projects and he would not like to have others follow with gravel surfacing of parking lots. Mr. Glenn stated curb and gutter and asphalt creat a non-porous surface. Ms. Smith stated the building was not being used in its historical capacity, it would be used for manufacturing retail and industrial. She stated that a business with a commercial parking lot is a challenge when surfaced with gravel and suggested large trucks would tear up the gravel. MOTION: Mr. Glenn moved to amend the motion to recommend the applicant replace the asphalt surface with a gravel surface to fit the historical character of the neighborhood. The motion died due to the lack of a second. The original motion carried 7-1 with Mr. Glenn voting against the motion. C. Walton Homestead Subdivision Concept PUD - #Z-02004 - (Kozub) 1503 Durston Road * A Concept PUD Plan Review to develop 35.375 acres into a mixed-use residential, professional offices, and commercial condominium Planned Unit Development. Gene Cook, Bill Hanson, Jerry Taylor, and Kevin Cook joined the DRB. Planner Skelton presented the Staff Report, noting the location is between the mobile home parks to the west and the potential site of the County jail and the Gallatin County Rest Home to the east. He stated the proposal was a PUD because it included 6-plexes and Walton Way as a private street. Bill Hanson gave a slide presentation. He stated there are two key issues, the open space and pedestrian access from south and north of the site. He stated Rose Park is the largest, nearest park to the site. He stated the adjacent area to the east is open agricultural land. He noted the Walton project would continue pedestrian access to the Bridger Peaks Town Center to the City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 7 it�iy,-rF ! .�. northwest. He stated the proposal is for a condo area, apartment, office and mixed-use area at the north end. He noted North 15`h Avenue would bisect the site, and noted they propose a bend in the street to create buildable lots. He stated the applicant proposed the project to be completed in 3 phases, with phase three being the commercial north end of the property. He described the connecting streets to be installed between Durston Road and Oak Street. He indicated the pedestrian access corridor throughout the complex. He described the right-of- way widths. He stated the public park was intended as a private pocket park for use of the residents near Juniper Street. He stated the intent of the meandering walkways is to get to the park. Ms. Noel asked for clarification on the public park shown in Juniper Street. Planner Skelton stated Juniper Street is the only east-west street between Durston Road and Oak Street. Ms. Noel stated overall the concept was strong, and she noted she had a sense that the land was densely packed with buildings. She stated she liked the idea of the central park, the mixed uses, and the way the nodes connect. Ms. Smith stated the project was a good example of infill, however she stated it was too dense. She would like to see one or two larger areas of park land instead of the smaller parks. She stated the applicant should anticipate that Juniper Street would go through from North 7`' Avenue to North 11" Avenue. She suggested two one-acre improved parks with smaller parks in between. She noted she was concerned about the access from Durston Road as there were no turn lanes. She stated the trails should continue without passing through a parking lot. She stated she was concerned with the length of the parking lots for safety reasons. Mr. Pohl stated he would prefer a larger consolidated park space. He noted he preferred a stronger sense of neighborhood identity and liked the way the trail cuts through the condo area. He suggested the inclusion of a pedestrian crossing at North 15"Avenue/Durston Road. He noted the nodes and the sense of identity of the neighborhood were well done. He stated the project would be better if it included more park space. He was concerned that the linear pathway system was interrupted. Ms. Wills asked about the existing home site and if it was the only existing homesite. Mr. Hanson stated the existing site shown is not owned by the applicant and would stay, however, he noted two homesites would be removed. He stated one house will be moved and the other destroyed. Ms. Wills asked if the trail system connects to the Gallatin County Rest Home. Mr. Hanson noted it didn't, but could. Ms. Wills asked if the trailer park is integrated with the project. Mr. Hanson stated an existing fence and a ditch provide a barrier. He stated the ditch will be re-routed closer to the property line. Mr. Cook stated the trailer park people have indicated a wooden fence would be a possibility between the trailer park and the site. Ms. Wills asked if North 14" Avenue will be installed during the third phase even though it is located in the county. She suggested shifting the public park to allow the development of Juniper Street. She suggested locating a pocket park in the other sector. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 8 Mr. Raznoff stated he would support several parks instead of one big park. He suggested the '` "4 y trails connect the parks with the trails continuing through the park. He stated the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board had suggested a more formal walking trail along the west side of the site. Mr. Hanson stated the reality is that North 15`h Avenue was the main access to and thru the site. He stated the meandering trails on the property are designed to be private, but to get from point A to point B, North 151h Avenue will be the main street. He suggested landscaped berms be added as a buffer. Mr. Glenn stated he disagreed with members of the Board who have suggested a large dedication of park land. He stated the proposal was for very low suburban density without a suburban typology. He noted as an infill project it should have twice the density. He stated he had a general feeling that the site has too much of what had already been seen, and suggested the project had a high concentration of the same building type. He stated the commercial portion has a suburban feel not urban. He agreed that the lots along Oak Street were good commercial lots. He suggested twisting the buildings to align them with the street and align the commercial structures with Oak Street. Planning Director Epple stated that, according to the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, the south side of Oak Street was intended for residential uses while the north side should have commercial uses. Mr. Glenn suggested the residential uses be located above office or retail uses. Chairperson Sorenson stated there are three cultures in the proposed development. He stated there should be mixing of the developments possibly. He would like to see pocket parks but a couple of larger nodes for parks should be included. He suggested using the ditch as an amenity. Mr. Hanson stated it handles the storm run off from Durston Road. He noted it formerly was an irrigation ditch and has been abandoned. D. StoneRidge Center MaSP/COA - #Z-02001 — (Caroline) 2002, 2040, 2055, 2011 North 22nd Avenue * A Major Site Plan Application to develop 2.27 acres into four single level, multi-tenant office buildings, and necessary site improvements. MOTION: Mr. Pohl moved, Mr. Glenn seconded, to continue the review of application#Z- 02001 to Tuesday, February 19, 2002. The motion carried unanimously. F. Design Objectives Plan Update — (Saunders) * Review Design Objectives Plan Update. To be continued. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 9 q , 7 o G. Zone Code Amendments - (Saunders) 1 of a 2 week review. * Review Zone Code Amendments. To be continued. ITEM 4. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Raznoff seconded to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Henry Sorenson, Jr. Chairperson City of Bozeman Design Review Board City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes—February 12, 2002 10 �,� �=y �,� L��j ►� N�y Cam,--� �_ Vooc.k,� ,dam k,4 _ n ._ - ��-J( . �o� �l-1 (�iV 1 (� '�1��7,J J�•� Vim,� 1� t�A mot, C �-� 1��.�11. ✓.�1J �� '�.� �.,�:_ .._. . '14:51RE ----------- Oanre'� s-ur�rn� �' �Y°Jeck W��5 d6tcA(\ NVA �, Cis V Unb*) o r R�irvu wfbvm li h C�N`e l9�rnPN`'� �InYLQc-`' Ewa. aq, tr) I irnW paw pGwK, aG-('eta I C�- , �` pYiVat-e 213 acme, _ w 1 p � � �api i �afy wce14 C A VV ea�� 0 `(�.s�,s }�,�kzN -foal CflNhk(�i o�v� (VAN U.DED-� 5 Rf1t�QD '' �- �roo mVtGln � Wa�'s `a, \- RtN�2 �U✓�� '`bD YV1_(uvw� .2/vrt'�RM.�,eg_ Ctvo -hvrw+�� -h-aj�,� oVin 4- ckV\A-1 hAkZ -1- Art�' 4 4 0 JOTbwd vv tvwp"� q hAAA4 16 tw_�- N.9 a A/V, 4 tnQ Phi _ _ UYGNq '�a Yvtal�A rvrn i ze �22d . XyY� a-vi I\W pckln .� 1 Go 41'YIQ ' P\k* NtiWv? -rya+ for PP,in. _ I vr4q ra+i a/t -h- . ,.Tr oU Q,ar fw� 0 ou�, �#4� fa� � ro Qal o» rAM-� ,&4t4, Cnhnj (�i rn a� a C c.esS .......... w1n?�s - --- -_-�_� f OWU UIT44 --few /Y1. o pcwk.�_ I O ----- Sp a cz 74 1vv 30 -7, 6 z a Ci-es 6Z oil Z�ZD �I eC _ Bo a,,r b,,e a99 vyq a*ej i n coyvl w h , tO4 � sue, p_ (78 1 J-(Amipe-..,r (�w' +ttrt) a j OKh SpO.CQ re.q wi ewe -. . e,c o �►w�ndc� � � � ° 6�� c c 2 � 9 WALTON HOMESTEAD CONCEPT P.U.D. ZONING FILE NO. Z-02064 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT ITEM: ZONING APPLICATION NO. Z-02004 -- AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT P.U.D. PLAN REVIEW FOR A MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 35.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN WEST OAK STREET AND DURSTON ROAD, ZONED "R-0", RESIDENTIAL OFFICE DISTRICT, AND "R-319, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT. APPLICANT: GENE COOK, REPRESENTING DURSTON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1800 WEST KOCH STREET, SUITE 5 BOZEMAN, MT 59715 OWNER: OAKWAY, L.L.C. �,d 6 6 S+k U K,\ dN\if ,Su4 r�l BOZEMAN, MT 59715 DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002, AT 3:30 P.M., IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, 20 EAST OLIVE STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: DAVE SKELTON/SUSAN KOZUB SENIOR PLANNER/ASSISTANT PLANNER ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proiect Description: The subject property is legally described as being Tracts 1-4 of Certificate of Survey No. 2085 and that parcel described in Book 144, Page 373 located in the SW 1/4 of Section 1, T1S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and is further identified as property situated between West Oak Street and Durston Road, located immediately west of the Gallatin County Nursing Home on Durston Road, and east of Steven's Subdivision/Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park and Homesites Subdivision. The site is approximately 35.375 acres in size and fronts Durston Road along the south boundary and West Oak Street along the north boundary. Please refer to the vicinity map provided on the following page. Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review . 1 _2 Proposal: The applicant, Mr. Gene Cook on behalf of Oakway L.L.C., has made application for Concept P.U.D. Plan Review of a mixed-use residential, professional office, and retail/commercial planned unit development consisting of 96 multi-family apartments and 87 condominium dwelling units on the south two-thirds of the property (zoned "R-3"), and approximately 85,000 sq. ft. of commercial office and 10,000 sq. ft. of retail space situated on the north one-third (zoned "R-0") of the site. The proposal is also undergoing a concurrent pre-application subdivision plan review of the 35+ acre site as a major subdivision. The three-phased mixed-use planned unit development is located in the West Oak Street entryway corridor overlay district along its north boundary and is bound on the south by the collector street, Durston Road. Gallatin County lands and the County Rest Home are to the east and a mix of residential housing types in Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park and Homesites Subdivision are to the west. The placement of mixed land uses within the development focuses on multi-family apartments serving as a transition between multi-family condominiums to the south and mixed-use retail commercial and retail space to the north. The applicant has conceptually discussed limited loft-type residential dwelling units to be integrated into the commercial component of the P.U.D. The "R-3", Residential Medium Density District, allows for the development of one to five-unit residential structures providing for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of families of different size, age, and character, while reducing the adverse effects of nonresidential uses. Conditional uses permitted in the district range from bed and breakfast homes and churches to golf courses, day cares and lodging houses. The "R-0", Residential Office District, provides for and Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 2 encourages the development of professional offices, business headquarters, and compatible multi- household and apartment development that would blend well with adjacent uses. Conditional uses that may be considered in the "R-O" district are similar to that listed in the "R-3". The applicant is proposing the mixed-use development as a zoning P.U.D. in order to incorporate the construction of six-unit, multi-family condominium structures, which are not listed as a permitted use in the "R-3", Residential Medium Density District. In addition, the proposal is requesting to include approximately 10,000 sq. ft. of retail space that is not provided for in the "R-O", Residential Office District, unless considered as part of planned unit development. The 35+-acre mixed-use planned unit development shall be evaluated against Chapter 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" and Chapter 18.43 "Bozeman Entryway Corridor Overlay District". Chapter 18.54—Planned Unit Development The intent of the planned unit development concept is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and welfare, it shall be the intent of this title to promote the city's pursuit of community objectives as outlined in Section 18.54.020 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of the Concept P.U.D. Plan Review is for discussion of the applicant's proposal with the designated review committees in order to identify any requirements and applicable standards and policies, as well as offering the applicant the opportunity to identify major problems that may exist and identify solutions prior to making formal application. Section 18.54.100.E—"All Development Criteria" • Neighborhood Compatibility: The ability of the mixed-use planned unit development to ensure compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site will fall substantially on the aptitude of the applicant to prepare a Development Manual, which will implement the architectural and landscape guidelines for the project. Consideration must be given to scale, mass, neighborhood identity, landscape, orientation of buildings, use of materials, color palette, and specific architectural character-giving features that will define the architectural parameters of the planned unit development. The proposal will have the most immediate and greatest impact on adjoining properties to the west and should have the highest degree of review. Landscape, buffering features, open space, fencing and orientation of buildings adjoining the residential neighborhood must be considered. • Natural Resources: Existing vegetation along the west boundary should be preserved. Walton's Ditch, which runs the length of the property, is limited in use and does not show evidence of any mature vegetation, wetlands, wildlife habitat, or wildlife activity that would justify consideration of the ditch as a potential linear open space corridor in this area. Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 3 • Environmental Standards: Exterior lighting, both along the streetscape of North 15'h Avenue, North 14`h Avenue, Juniper Street, and Walton Way, as well as interior off-street parking lots and the wall-mounted fixtures of each structure will play an integral role in implementing a unified theme for the planned unit development. The architectural guidelines should outline a lighting theme that reinforces the innovative design of the mixed-use planned unit development. • Site Design: Open Space — The applicant, because of the concurrent review of both subdivision and zoning P.U.D. applications, has the opportunity to provide either dedicated public parkland through subdivision review, 30% usable open space through zoning P.U.D. review, or a combination thereof. The applicant has elected to focus on the 30% open space provision, exclusive of yard setbacks and parking lot interior landscaping, for use by the residents and their guests as usable open space, and the possible development of approximately 1.63 acres of public park. The issue of usable open space for this mixed-use project is critical to the organizational scheme and cohesiveness of the development proposal. As a result, the purpose and function of usable open space within the confines of this development proposal, the immediate neighborhood(s), and the context of the community as a whole should be determined early on in the review process. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has recommended that three smaller public parks, are less effective than one larger park located in the interior of the development that could serve a neighborhood(s) in an area of the community which currently contains no public parklands. Furthermore, the advisory body recommends that dedicated parkland should be provided with this project (see attached letter from Recreation and Parks Advisory Board dated January 28, 2002 — Attachment "A"). The applicant comments that the organization of open space areas is designed to provide open areas between and behind structures, buffers between adjacent land uses and adjoining properties, as well as an emphasis on the streetscape. However, based on the anticipated residential population of approximately 440 residents within the mixed-use planned unit development, the applicant's proposal may not provide ample open space provisions for use as usable recreational space. Pedestrian Circulation - Based on the site's location in the community, a hierarchy for pedestrian movement in this area involves: 1) a major link for a future trail system in the North l9`h Area/West Oak Street Sub-Area Plan that focuses on future Rose Park as the hub for pedestrian and bike circulation, 2) development of North 15`h Avenue as a collector street, 3) public streetscape for pedestrian circulation, and 4) private trail system within the interior of the mixed-use development. The Gallatin Valley Land Trust has commented on the desire of the community to implement a trail corridor through the development in proximity to the collector street, North 15` Avenue. A secondary trail system for private use by residents and their quests should connect with the desired north/south trail along South 15th Avenue and any designated public park areas within the development (see attached letter from Gary Vodehnal dated February 4, 2002 —Attachment "B„ Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 4 The Development Manual for this project will need to identify how the pedestrian circulation system is designed to: 1) assure pedestrians can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties, 2) incorporate design features to enhance convenience, safety, and amenity across parking lots and streets, and 3) integrate the various land uses and avoid isolated pads of development. Treatment of paving patterns, change in grade, landscape, lighting, and street furniture should be incorporated into the design guidelines. Because the pedestrian circulation system will aid in producing an efficient, functionally organized, and cohesive planned unit development, consideration should be given to stronger connections between areas of useable open space and through off-street parking lots, as well as connections with public areas. Fewer accentuated crossings across the collector street, North 15`h Avenue, should be considered to limit the potential conflict between vehicular and pedestrian circulation. A high degree of emphasis on raised walkways, pavers, and landscape features should be given to any pedestrian crossings along North 15`h Avenue. Landscape — At the concept level the application does not delineate the amount and use of landscape intended. However, the written narrative provided with the application does define implementation of a more formal structured arrangement intended in areas of the professional office/retail land uses, informal landscape placements in the residential areas, and an emphasis on the streetscape. With exception to the professional office/retail area along the north one- third of the site, the remaining interior parking lot landscape areas throughout the project seem minimal. Major vehicular and pedestrian entrance points into the development, vehicular/pedestrian connections within the interior, building appearance, and useable open space areas are should provide an emphasis on a variety of landscape types and features that contain both a mix of variety, texture, types and seasonal color. Street furniture and landscape features located at key connections of the pedestrian circulation network and intersections of pedestrian and vehicular movements should be incorporated into the landscape guidelines. Storm water retention/detention ponds in front yards and usable open space areas are not desirable unless they are contributing features to the overall landscape scheme of the project. Section 18.5 4.100.E—"Residential Criteria" The anticipated residential density is consistent with the development densities set forth in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. No residential density bonus is requested with this application. • With the preliminary P.U.D. Plan Review, the applicant will need to demonstrate that the mixed-use planned unit development proposal provides ample outdoor areas for use by persons working and residing in the development for both active and passive recreational activities. Chapter 18.43 —Entryway Overlay District The purpose and application of the Design Objectives Plan is to recognize the importance of three guiding principles to guide growth along the community's entryway corridors: flexibility, appropriateness and clarity of direction. Consideration should be given to using a "sliding scale" in applying the Design Objectives Plan guidelines. As a result, they are to be applied with an attitude of flexibility. The greater the degree of change proposed, the greater and more elaborate the degree of Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 5 review. However, the guidelines do set forth a threshold of design expectations and must not be ignored or cast aside by an argument that each project is unique. • Site Development: A stronger physical relationship between buildings and the street envelope of West Oak Street should be encouraged. Areas designated for retail should encourage pedestrian interaction and the ability to enjoy outside seating and public areas. A pubic plaza or public area, in concert with the project, as well as the transit facility proposed near the intersection with North 15`h Avenue, would encourage social interaction between patrons, employees, residents, and transit people in the community. • Building Design: The architectural guidelines for this project should exhibit design elements and character- giving features that exhibit a unity of design and compatibility throughout the project, keeping in mind that West Oak Street serves as a demarcation boundary in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan for residential development to the south and commercial development to the north. Treatment of mass, scale, roof forms, materials, fenestration, color palette, and public/private areas should be used to encourage a coordinated development. Standardized "franchise" style architecture is strongly discouraged and should instead reflect regional character, history and climate. Buildings along the corridor should be designed to avoid the back of buildings fronting onto the entryway. • Signage: Signs should be an integral part of the overall architectural design. A common signage program that specifies location, size, lighting, materials, and unified graphic design for both shared and individual signs should be expected. Low profile signs should be strongly encouraged along West Oak Street and should be limited to only project identification signage. The architectural guidelines should reflect the restricted limitations of signage for property located in the "R-O" district. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal for Concept P.U.D. Plan Review Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Comments—Attachment"A" Gallatin Valley Land Trust Comments—Attachment"B" Mailed To: Oakway, L.L.C., 1800 West Koch, Suite 5, Bozeman, MT 59715 Taylor, Hanson, Kane Architects, 101 E. Main St., Studio One, Bozeman, MT 59715 Walton Homestead P.U.D.—Concept Plan Review 6 L • WACHMENT "A" To: Dave Skelton Susan Kozub Department of Planning and Community Development From: Anne Banks Subdivision Review Committee, Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Re: Walton Homestead PUD/Subdivision Date: January 28,2002 Dave: Thanks for meeting with us on Friday and clarifying some of the points regarding this PUD/Subdivision. It appears that as a PUD it would have an open space requirement of 30%, while as a subdivision it will have a park dedication requirement of 5.5 acres,based on the number of dwelling units per acre. In view of the density of the development and the lack of usable parkland near it—the nearest park is Kirk Park—the Recreation and Parks Advisory board strongly recommends the dedication of parkland. An area on the southwest side seems most suitable, since it would be close to the housing phases. The future Juniper Street right-of- way should not be considered part of the required 5.5 acres. Since North 15`h will become a major arterial between the high school and the Bridger Peaks Town Center,it is desirable to have a trail as a connector, particularly since a trail along the Walton Creek/Ditch corridor is planned for Bridger Peaks and the Lowe's Home Improvement development immediately to its north. The trail could be used by the high school cross country runners for training as well as by the rest of the community. For future reference,it would be helpful to have a policy statement defining "usable open space"and requiring that open space dedications be usable. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. CITY P►1,�•ii ilr.;+; • * ATTACHMENT "B". - cy Gallatin Valley Land Trust February 4, 2002 Dave Skelton and Susan Kozub City of Bozeman,Department of Planning and Community Development 20 E. Olive, P. 0. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 y `' Re: Walton Homestead P.U.D. C!- Y Dear Dave and Susan: I have reviewed the Walton Homestead P.U.D. Concept Plan Submittal, and would like to make several suggestions and comments. An unbroken trail corridor should be planned along the project's western boundary from Durston Road to Oak Street. This corridor should be a least 25 feet wide and contain a primary trail at least 5 feet wide. Secondary trails should be planned to connect this primary trail with the Public Park and residential and commercial areas within the project. A primary trail from Durston to Oak Street would provide non-motorized access from Walton Homestead,local schools, and surrounding neighborhoods to commercial developments, existing trails, and planned trails north of Oak Street. The Walton Homestead trail corridor would connect with a planned trail corridor along the Walton Creek/Ditch adjacent to the Bridger Peaks Town Center and the Lowe's Home Improvement development. The Walton Creek/Ditch trail corridor begins on the north side of Oak Street adjacent to the northwest corner of Walton Homestead. In addition, an existing paved boulevard trail along Oak Street also begins at the northwest , corner of Walton Homestead and ends near the post office at Baxter Lane. Finally,the dedicated Public Park appears to include the Juniper Street right-of-way. If and when this right-of-way is developed as a paved street,the park will be fragmented and greatly reduced in size. The Public Park should not be located on'this'right-of-way, and should be moved farther south to be centrally located among the Multi-Family residences. Than4ely pportunity to comment. Sin c ary rail Program Coordinator P.O. Box 7021 ■ Bozeman, Montana 59771-7021 ■ 406-387-8404 ■ Fax 406- 582-1136 ■ www.gvlt.o.rg CITY OF BOZEMAN dog so2� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406) 582-2360 7�t =: ? 20 East Olive Street 1883 �° Fax: (406) 582-2363 co �o� Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE FROM: SUSAN KOZUB, ASSISTANT PLANNER RE: WALTON HOMESTEAD CONCEPT PUD AND PREAPPLICATION PLAN REVIEW DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 2002 The Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the pre-application plan review for Walton Homestead PUD Subdivision, and as a result offers the following comments for consideration. 1. The applicant shall submit a zoning application for Preliminary PUD Plan Review of this subdivision phase concurrently with the preliminary plat application. The application shall include a Developmental Manual including architectural and landscape guidelines to implement the development of the mixed-use residential/professional office building planned unit development. 2. A full Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement will be required with the preliminary plat application. The issue of compensation for parkland and/or common open space through a previous agreement with the City of Bozeman must be addressed prior to submitting for preliminary plat review of said subdivision. Portions of the Juniper Street right-of-way located to the west of the intersection with North 15u'Avenue may be used for parkland and/or common open space in the interim, but may not be used in satisfying the required parkland/open space calculations, unless the City Commission grants said authorization. The open space requirement for this project shall be approximately: [Total acreage—r/w] multiplied by 30%: [35.38—4.9] * 0.30 30.48 * 0.30 9.14 acres 4. Storm-water retention ponds shall not make up more than 1/3 of the frontage along Oak Street or Durston Road. The landscape guidelines for the PUD shall require all retention ponds located in required yard setbacks and common open space area to be designed as a landscape feature with a slope not exceeding 1:4 or 25%, with a maximum depth-of not more than one and one-half(1 '/2) feet. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation historic preservation • housing grant administration • neighborhood coordination • S 5. A one (1) foot wide "No Access" stripe for all lots fronting onto Durston Road and Oak Street shall be noted accordingly on the final plat. 6/ The setbacks for Blocks 1 through 4 are as follows: 20' front setback along all public streets including 15"' Street, 14"' Street, and Juniper. Note that the required setback for Oak Street is 50' and the required setback for Durston Road is 25'. The east boundary (exclusive of 14"' Street) and the west boundary of the subject property shall have rear yard setbacks of 20'. There are no side-yard setbacks according to the current configuration of blocks. 7. Walton Way will require a 30' utility/access easement exclusive of the boulevard and sidewalks. - 8 With the preliminary plan, we will require a profile of all street sections showing the placement of streets,boulevards, sidewalks, etc. 9. The drive access (le Block 1, Phase_ 2) is required to be 24'. A 30' Utility/ Access Easement is required for this drive access. 10. A Traffic Impact Analysis will be required as set forth in the Subdivision Regulations and outlined by the Department of Engineering. 11. Street names shall be verified by the County Road Office. 12. Covenants, restrictions, and articles of incorporation for the creation of Homeowner's/Property Owner's Association documents shall be submitted with the preliminary plat application and shall contain, but not be limited to, provisions for assessment and maintenance, repair and upkeep of roads, sidewalks, emergency access, common areas , parkland / open space areas, trails, snow removal, and other areas common to the association. 13. Street lighting is currently being required with residential subdivisions to ensure adequate street lighting throughout subdivisions. This may, or may not, be an issue with this subdivision during preliminary plat review. 14. During preliminary plan review, the applicant shall specify the number and type of dwelling units. 15. If the applicant is requesting a reduced front yard setback for the moving of the existing home at the corner of Durston and the proposed North 15t" Street, it must be specifically requested in writing with the preliminary plat application. This also includes any request for relaxation of any additional zoning and/or subdivision regulatory standards. FURTHER COMMENTS AND ADVICE MAY BE PROVIDED WITH THE WRITTEN SUMMARY- REVIEW LETTER BASED ON ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PROVIDED BY OTHER APPLICABLE REVIEW AGENCIES. Page 2 802�'.� • THE CITY OF BOZEMAN • Vti 9x 20 E. OLIVE• P.O. BOX 1230 * * BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-1230 Ck� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 9AjN CO. PHONE: (406) 582-2380• FAX: (406)582-2363 February 4, 2002 To: Development Review Committee From: Bob Murray, Project Engineer �rvl Re: Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD Pre-Ap - #P-02001 Walton Homestead Subdivision Concept PUD - #Z-02004 The following comments should be incorporated into the preliminary plat application for this Subdivision: 1. An access permit will need to be obtained from the Montana Department of Transportation for the intersection of Oak and 15th Avenue, and the permit should be verified for 14th Avenue. 2. This developer will be required to install one additional lane, including chip seal, striping, curb, gutter and sidewalk along the length of the Oak Street frontage. 3. A traffic analysis will need to be prepared to examine the effects of the subdivision on adjoining intersections, and all identified improvements installed as part of this subdivision. 4. Capacities in the existing sewer main will need to be verified as part of the plan submittal for the project. An easement will need to be granted for the existing 18" sewer main as part of this project. 5. The existing irrigation ditch will need to be relocated where it conflicts with the building envelope on the proposed lots. This carries stormwater runoff from Durston which must be perpetuated. An easement must be granted for the storm drain pipe which comes off of Durston W at this location. 6. The preliminary plat application should include a preliminary stromwater plan. cc: ERF Project File HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK ;f Development Review Committee (DRC) Meeting Review Sheet ------------- Date: Project Name: W o,Q-6 v, File # _ 6 2 O-0 If Prepared By: �m�g V\ Applicants/Rep Present: DRC Members Present: t—T� ❑ , Project Eng. ❑ Craig Brawner, City Engineer ❑ Mike Certalic, Water Sup. ❑ Debbie Arkall, Public Service NNeil Poulsen, Chief Building Official IMoger Sicz, Streets Superintendent lave Skelton, Senior Planner 0 Greg Megaard, Police & Fire 0 Others ;E(i yyy.o SUMMARY: 06tvt.- oti. �,..�( ox S.�b. UP — pr%vQ-4-e roctot - . W0-0fio W`� I 'fZov.—rh i+ w.f ==6 K-e Waiven,2- C of(Pc-4- oe o 6 -r-i"ri" w/fee bb; �2,'� k "&'M OAK �j + nn G+ �Q CAC c.�M,�.1,�� oak ►ln�e,�S.�.c-1-i oh �-_J��h�-�__�_ - 1�-_��_fir ' .J ? Q 'VMcL s. s C'Oywb 07 7utn i P�.r �oe.S h of Gov�U�+ rirn(nJ -�o Pu b l i c ?Q r K 131AI - .o Woc ko CIO ki�,q c.-r L/,j' ►� -__�ear y a car s ��e-� G Iwov eq( � G CITY OF BOZEMAN U 9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street 1883 '�° Fax: (406)582-2363 8 Mo? Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net To: Members of the DRC From: Susan Kozub, Assistant Planner Date: 1/29/02 Re: Walton Homestead Concept PUD and Sub Pre-Ap Subdivision: * Parkland dedication, refer to Dave * Project should be reviewed as a Major Subdivision based on condominiums, not number of lots znm)ri�:x ; * Open Space, refer to Dave 15`h is a collector which would require a 90' r/w. Ask Bob to confirm that 65' is okay with Director of Public Service and acting City Engineer. A'Oak Street is an entryway corridor We're looking at trail to the North, and sidewalk/boulevard to the South 50' setback off of Oak Detention Ponds shall not make up more than 1/3 of front .. Street Trees are required (1 per 50') for Oak, Durston, 15`h, the west side of 14`h, Juniper, and Walton `*Walton's Ditch (not a stream ditch, but it becomes a stream ditch north of Oak) Parking: not to exceed 100' of continuous parking Questions: * Confirm whether or not there is residential in the R-0 section planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation historic preservation • housing grant administration • neighborhood coordination Development Review Committee (DRC) Meeting Review Sheet �- ga o0y Date: I �� Project Name: Wa File # P-0 3 001 Prepare By:�S V1 Applicants/Rep Present: — DRC Members Present: ❑ $013 , Project Eng. ❑ Craig Brawner, City Engineer ❑ Mike Certalic, Water Sup. ❑ Debbie Arkall, Public Service Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official N Roger Sicz, Streets Superintendent Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Q�-Jreg Megaard, Police & Fire Others awl SUMMARY: - Tn f- -o Am C e PVD C,J - m 1 x off- C OV7 dos Gam`uz , a c1 otrMt4d �-e M,ea a-kCl Z,0"d V) &44" he q 0 0-,�- N C_V C,(ar f� w-kI 00 - try�►' V uot, °� nAp . R 'Cb VJ ut, 1 z 6 S JAts �16(w. P� _ �� i�ci-*t? �u'b�1 c. Palk �s s - Huh i� cit,�,fi s -�hko�c�ti, q�a-rk VO Y Q,Wlk, S " �vlb� r qu, u I ' J oak 15 BOZ CITY OF BOZEMAN U 9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 0 `-_ Phone: (406)582-2360 v --=- 20 East Olive Street <<�r 8 O��e Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406) 582-2363 CO. 0 Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net Walton Homestead PUD Concept Plan and Minor Subdivision Pre-Ap I. Introduction: a. The project proposes to develop 35.375 acres into 4 lots b. The project proposes to have a transitional mix of condos, apartments, professional offices and some retail. c. The property has already been annexed and zoned R-0 to the North and R-3 to the south d. 2020 designates this property as Business Park to the North and Residential to the south. H. Right of Way should be 90' as opposed to the 65' shown as North 15th Street is a designated collector street (Note that Walton Way is shown as a private street) III. With the Annexation, we got waivers of right to protest for improvements to Durston and for a signal at Durston and N. 15th planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination �-3 �a✓�iC,Qa 10�e,+�YO'Clel — -f-a.Q Ci CA-11�1 - ZA a\l fie.i-b a cts — - Q Ir G�-s - _ Z O' F-�-0 tn+ 2,0 ' Ste, , 1 c� � �w►�� l Rtovr\ "a wK — w Q"+ bowl, S Q"J6*v,� par+ o� vPR+ -c. ) s�A&moaXs 4-o eve. 0-�- o\ v, �( S�I'&A�AjLe 61— rQ Ire I-t 10 Adi coed }� �c 0 ' Kud 3 R /W Or f rr a - ct ~Tym* c- 1"a Q,� ' S. Pk a c.k lrv�tl� �S D C r w �o�j �ee3ol�r�.i ,©� 0 0K C rYn Y\ ,ter- 54aMol" ©-t, N o v+ ,t T-C S y C S4e- {' � Na to +s oU-* dj,NAV� - r �V\) SK O C E,owo"t I ark., P ba. G�- r per'? C j rfv ` o 330 by A s-essfylM-� \ .2 .. . . . Feb 20 02 03:OOp Bch eman Comfort Inn 406 587 2423 p• 2 Gene E. Cook 2504 West Main Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)586-0302 Feb 20, 2002 City Planning Office C/o Dave Skelton Attention Dave Skelton: We grant your office an extension to allow more time for City review of the Walton property. Sincerely, Gene E. Cook Feb 20 02 03: 00p Borman Comfort Inn 406 587 2423 p. l facsimile TRANSMITTAL BOZEMAN COMFORT B�TN Name. Organization: Fax: l0 3 — Phone: From: l ` V\-Q... Date: Subject: Pages: Comments: BOZEMAN COMFORT INN 1370 N T'Avenue Phone:406-587-2322 Bozmw!n Montana 59715 Fax:406.587-2423 �04 B0Z�•tf CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582 2360 e 1883 0?�° 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2363 iAr co. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 world wide web: www.bozemar.net Gene Cook Oakway, LLC 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 101 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Walton Homestead Concept PUD / Subdivision Pre-Ap February 14, 2002 Dear Mr. Cook, In light of this project going before the City Commission on March 11,2002 at the conceptual level, Staff respectfully requests an extension in order to provide you with a summary letter that incorporates comments from the DRC,the DRB,and the City Commission. Please send us a written memo granting this extension as soon as possible. Thank you and please call us with any questions. Sincerely, Susan�Kozub CC: Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Bill Hanson, 101 East Main Street, Studio One,Bozeman MT 59715 V 9'Z * - BOZEMAN CITY PLANNING OFFICE << 1883 20 East Olive Street IN co.00 P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, Montana 5 9771-123 0 Phone: (406) 582-2360 Fax: (406) 582-2363 FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE OF Z DATE: - — TO: G-eku 6o 0 FAX NUMBER: S 13 FROM: �- CAM 0-z'w'q RE: yv �f'�'1.2CA& Uel EVA -'y b .. lore MESSAGE: planning zoning subdivision revicu, annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination CITY O(&OZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 s === �� 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 <<��, Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Redburn or Gary Griffith, Bozeman School District No. 7 Pat Byorth or Kurt Alt, Fish, Wildlife, and Parks y Doug Moeller, MDT, Bozeman Division Wendy Williams,Natural Resources Conservation Service Ann Banks, Parks &Recreation Advisory Board Sue Harkin, Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Mark Tymrak, Director of Public Safety Ralph Zimmer, Pedestrian &Public Safety Committee, TCC FROM: Carol L. Schott, Administrative Secretary RE: Walton Homestead MiSub PUD Pre-Application Plat #P-02001 and;Zoning PUD Concept Plan #Z-02004 DATE: January 15, 2002 Attached you will find the pre-application and zoning PUD Concept plan applications for the proposed Minor Subdivision PUD referenced above to develop 35.375 acres into 4 lots for residential and commercial condominium uses. The property is legally described as being Lots 1-4, C.O.S. 2085 and that parcel described in Book 144,Page 373, located in the SW'/4 of Section 1, T12, R5E of PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and is located at 1503 Durston Road. Please review the attached information and provide comments to this office no later than Tuesday, February 4, 2002. The proposed subdivision PUD and concept plan will be discussed by the Development Review Committee on January 291h and February 5th at 10:00 a.m. The proposed zoning Concept PUD will be discussed by the Design Review Board at 3:30 p.m. on February 121h. The meetings will be held in the downstairs Conference Room, Alfred Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street. You are welcome and encouraged to attend these meetings. If you are unable to respond in writing by the above deadline or if you have questions or concerns regarding the application, we ask that you contact Assistant Planner Susan Kozub at 582-2360 Thank you for your cooperation. / Q CLS/cls Attachments planning• zoning • subdivision review •'annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination so CITY *OZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * ' Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 1. 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 o��e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net January 15, 2002 Oakway, LLC 1800 West Koch Street, Suite 5 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD Pre-Ap - #P-02000 & Concept PUD -#Z- 02004 Dear Sirs: The applications referenced above have been received and assigned to Assistant Planners Jami Morris and Susan Kozub. The applications have been reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklist and appear to meet the submittal requirements. However, please understand that during the course of review there may be items identified or issues which need to be addressed. Should that occur,Planners Morris or Kozub will be in contact with you. The Development Review Committee (DRC)will discuss the applications on Tuesday, January 29, 2002, and on Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 10:00 a.m. The Design Review Board (DRB) will discuss the applications on Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at 3:30 p.m. All meetings will be held in the Basement Conference Room in the Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street. It is highly recommended that you and/or your representative attend these meetings. Agendas will be sent to you and your representatives approximately one week before the meetings. Copies of the receipts are enclosed. Please feel free to contact Planner Morris or Planner Kozub at 582-2360 if you have any questions regarding the application or the review process in general. Sincerely, Jen ifer Willems Planning Secretary enc. JLW/jlw cc: Durston Development Company, 1800 West Koch, Suite 5, Bozeman, MT 59715 Rocky Mountain Engineers, 1700 West Koch Street, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59715 planning• zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration 9 neighborhood coordination RFCE��y /VI t in Engineers, P.L.L. FEB ,� ° °°' Rocky oun a �rYP INNING Civil Engineering & Land Surveying 1700 W. Koch St., Suite 7, Bozeman, Montana 59715 (406' 586-4859 February 15, 2001 Mr. Dave Skelton Department of Planning & Community Development 20 East Olive Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Waltor. Annexation Dear Dave, Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Walton Property Zoning Map and the legal descriptions for the entire property, and the individual R-3 and R-0 Zones. Please feel free to call if you should have any questions concerning the attached zoning boundary information. Best Regards, Ray H. Center, P.E., L.S. cc: Robin Sullivan Walton Subdivision Legal Description Five tracts of land located in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian of Montana, Gallatin County, Montana, and being further described as follows: Commencing at the South one-quarter corner of said Section 1. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the South line of said Southwest quarter a distance of 899.47 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the South line of said Southwest one-quarter, a distance of 183.33 feet. Thence North 02°15'36" West along the easterly line of a tract conveyed in Book 139, Page 515, a distance of 195.46 feet. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the northerly line of said tract, a distance of 183.20 feet. Thence South 02°15'36" East along the westerly line of said tract, a distance of 195.46 feet. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the South line of said Southwest one-quarter, a distance of 183.20 feet. Thence along the easterly line of Homesites Subdivision the following two courses: North 0295'36" West, a distance of 195.46 feet, thence North 02°21'56" West, a distance of 1203.65 feet.: Thence North 02°13'08" West along the easterly line of Steven's Subdivision, a distance of 1226.15 feet. Thence South 89*31'37" East along the southerly right-of-way of Oak Street, a distance of 650.48 feet. Thence South 00°05'17" East along the westerly line of the Gallatin County Rest Home property, as shown on the plat in Book 23 Misc., Page 50, a distance of 2627.55 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said tract of land being 35.375 acres along with and subject to any existing easements. Walton Subdivision- R-O Zone - Legal Description A tract of land located in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian of Montana, Gallatin County, Montana, and being further described as follows: Commencing at the South one-quarter corner of said Section 1. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the South line of said Southwest quarter a distance of 899.47 feet to the Southeast corner of the Walton Property. Thence North 00'05'17" West along the westerly line of the Gallatin County Rest Home property, as shown on the plat in Book 23 Misc., Page 50, a distance of 1753.52 feet to the True Point of Beginning, said point being the Southeast corner of the property to be zoned R-0, Residential Office District. Thence North 89°31'37" West, a distance of 617.95 feet. Thence North 02°13'08" West along the easterly line of Steven's Subdivision, a distance of 874.97 feet. Thence South 89*31'37" East along the southerly right-of-way of Oak Street, a distance of 650.48 feet. Thence South 00°05'17" East along the westerly line of the Gallatin County Rest Home property, a distance of 874.04 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said tract of land being 12.7251 acres along with and subject to any existing easements. Walton Subdivision- R-3 Zone - Legal Description A tract of land located in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian of Montana, Gallatin County, Montana, and being further described as follows: Commencing at the South one-quarter corner of said Section 1. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the South line of said Southwest quarter a distance of 899.47 feet to the ' Southeast corner of the Walton Property and the True Point of Beginning, said point being the Southeast corner of the property to be zoned R-3, Residential Medium Density District. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the South line of said Southwest one-quarter, a distance of 183.33 feet. Thence North 02°15'36" West along the easterly line of a tract conveyed in Book 139, Page 515, a distance of 195.46 feet. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the northerly line of said tract, a distance of 183.20 feet. Thence South 02°15'36" East along the westerly line of said tract, a distance of 195.46 feet. Thence North 88°58'57" West along the South line of said Southwest one-quarter, a distance of 183.20 feet. Thence along the easterly line of Homesites Subdivision the following two courses: North 02°15'36" West, a distance of 195.46 feet, thence North 02°21'56" West, a distance of 1203.65 feet. Thence North 02°13'08" West along the easterly line of Steven's Subdivision, a distance of 351.18 feet. Thence South 89°31'37" East, a distance of 617.95 feet. Thence South 00°05'17" East along the westerly line of the Gallatin County Rest Home property, as shown on the plat in Book 23 Misc., Page 50, a distance of 1753.52 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said tract of land being 22.6499 acres along with and subject to any existing easements. City of Bozeman Receipt 1 oa $ �. Bozeman, Montana 4 t1 d('�� '� , 20 _ � ` n Received of - -u� . fi the sum of �� lli''��r� ---` fIr )rd� < o Dollars- for tl jf�nlV- �o"t ( (fir V� r�l�l �•, (l 0 cri n / 2 V L By I i CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MT 59771-1230 (406) 582 2360 FAX(406) 582 2363 ��QV PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT JqN 03 CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION C17-�,, Z��P -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- &N�NG A Concept Plan Review is mandatory for all Planned Unit Development proposals. This is an opportunity for applicants to discuss requirements, standards, and policies that apply to development proposals, and to identify major problems, so that they can be solved before a formal application is made. Upon complete submittal, the application will be placed on the next available Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board (DRB) agendas for review. An incomplete submittal will be returned to the applicant. -------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: Oakway, LLC MOO N. •, '`e-9, Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 587-4426 2066 s+a�,um 'DI-ivg. � S-� •�� - - 2. Name and mailing address of applicant: Durston Development Corporation 1800 W. Koch, Suite' 5, Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 587-4426 3. Name of project/development: Walton Homestead P.U.D. 4. Address of proposed development: 1503 Durston Road, Bozeman, Montana 5. Land Area: sq. ft or 35.375 acres 6. Describe the proposed development (use additional sheets if necessary): Please see attached. 7. Review Fee: $220.00 (Minimum fee after refund: $140.00) This application must be accompanied by the appropriate fee and submittal requirements (see attached list). This application t be signed by both the property owner and applicant i different. Date Date. Property Owner's Signature Applicant's Signature CONCPPTPUD Jan 2000 1 CONCEPT PLAN RE VIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all PUD Concept Plan Applications. This checklist must be completed and returned with the application. Any items checked "NO" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Eighteen (18) copies of this information must be submitted for review by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and the Design Review Board (DRB). YES NO N/A 1. Data regarding: a) Site conditions; X b) Land characteristics; X c) Community facilities; X d) Utilities; X 1 e) General information about adjacent land uses; f) Land uses within 'h mile of the subject parcel ; X 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing showing: a) Proposed location of the uses of the land; X b)Major streets (on and off-site); X c) Significant features on the site; X d) Significant features within one-half mile of the site; X 3. A computation table showing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and as a percent of total site area. X REFERENCE SECTION 18.54.000.A, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCEPT PLANS, BOZEIVIAN ZONING ORDINANCE (PAGE 396-25). CONCEPTPUD Jan 2000 2 Y PAR�K_LAND AGRUMEN'T THIS AGREEMENT , made and entered into this 2nd _ day of. May 1983 , by and between the City of Bozeman, a municipal. corporation and political subdivision of the State of Montana , P.G. Box 640 , Bozeman , Montana 5971.5 ( "the City" ) and GENE E. COOK , whose business address is 611 West Main , Bozeman , Montane 5971.5 ; W I `I' N E S S E T H : WHEREAS , the Montane State Legislature is considering approval of an application for a park project known as Glenlake Park ("the Project" ) which is. located along the northern boundary of the City; and WHEREAS , Mr . Cook is the owner of real property located adjacent to the Project property; and WHEREAS , the City desires to enlarge the amount of real property within the pr.opo�;(-,d Project to include a por. t.ion of Mr . Cook ' s property ; and WHEREAS , Mr . Cook i.::; will-ing to hav(,� a, portion cr real property inclucled within thc- project ; NOW, THEREFORE, in conside.ratior► of` the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained , the pa•r.tiF:s hereto agree as follows : 1 . Mr . Cook will provide a survey which describes from 4 to 6 acres of real property owned by. him and located adjacent to the City-owned property which is a part of the Project . ? . The survey shall include particular real property and establish such lines as are acceptable to the Recreation Ad.visol-v Beard of. the Bozeman--Gallatin County Recrr.,,) -:i do Department . 3 . The survey shall he performed. L:,, a rpq.ister(ed i n,l surveyor . a , .; 4 . Mr. Cook shall convey the surveyed property by Warranty Deed to the City. 5 . The Citv shall credit Mr. Cook for that property which is conveyed to the City. 6 . The credit shall be established as equal to the precise acreage of the property conveyed by Mr. Cook or , in the case of a cash donation in lieu of the dedication of land pursuant to Section 76-3-606 (2) , M.C.A. 1981 , (-qual to 72 cents ner square foot of such conveyance . 7 , Mr. . Cook may use this credit to offset any requirements : for a dedication to the public for parks or playgrounds in accordance with Section 76-3-606 , M.C. A. 1.981 , in future subdivision dr'veloped by Mr . Cook within the City. In the alternative , i4r. Cook may use the credit. to offset any requir,:--ment for such a dedication in accordance with Section 76-3-6306 , M.C .A. 1981 , in future subdivisi()ns developed by hitn outride the city limits , so long as SLICh subdivisions' are located within a three (3) mile radius of the city limits and subject to approval of such a subdivision by Gallatin County. 8 . Mr. Cook may elect to use this credit for any subdivision within the City or its three (3) mile . radius , in which the final subdivision plat is approved on or before the expiration of fifteen (15) years from the date of this ,ic.1roement . 9 . Mr. . Cook may elect to use this credit in whole or in part frOM time. to time during the fifteen (15) year period . 10 . The terms of this agreement shall be enforceable only upon final approval of the Glenlakr, Park Application by the Montana S'taate Log is 1.atu.rn. . -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove written. THE CITY OF BOZEMAN BY 6 Gene E. Cook Its Mayor I 1 d s t - 1 -3- Oak Parkway Easement,,. . �Y 0 WID 00 `p 6 " Easement Trail ao y • Common Greenspace 0 Existing Mobile Home Park o �, o 0 0 0 0 RO Zone Change O Open Farmland z � � fill r Retention Area !! 1 I Retention Area D � o � - 0 lE Sewer Easement 8 a , 00 1' - Building Legend Existing Mobile Retail/office Apartments Home Park a Condominiums r Park Area Gallatin Rest Home Walton Subdivision C Hmx Conceptual Site Durston Development Lf North Taylor Architects P. C. 0 24 120 240 480 101 E.Main Street Studio One Bozeman,MT 59715