Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300220370618726) ' P�04009 West Winds MaSub 't eliminary Plat t of Davis Ln, S of Ba-ter Ln, F of Oak St. W of 27th Ave, N `{ Quest West, LLC n March 5, 2004 ,.. ` Y 1 Y tt' T\rat t,,.i o �•k�L - {'x .)v , e t'':'r . a 77ffYY , VI lo t �Y.F,, ' T,� +'��.`�;` ,� yda,,,,��M i�t�?S' +r *�+1 ,Y � i �.a, ,�.�,yy,,.. •t �J 'L `I a � '. +ia r� }.v' ti}t��,r�, k. '.,r •�d`�'1� r�a, �r Y I i ���r�I +tt.> � `� �`. �xn �.� . + Ir �,� n ) v'r'.v � ;y� o'+ . � . t 14 rr"' O I I ::'::::5^J... ._.-.,_:":r✓ iC•i E A--VV -- W fi 4i A C-5 4 Z I 3�4 L I 3zi I LANE (MINOR ARTERIAL) 2 r . . . . . . .T-f '> r, I� -.,�L_L_1J__LJ_J � 1.1__L_i_L_1 � __� � ( I, I 71--F 1 7 - 'F-1-7-1—T—T ---- -7-7 -14- L -L--L-i-J, L-J-J---L-J L T -1—F-7-T 7-1-7-1--r-17,1 Eq +- +- itIrl 1 - II I -—- -—-—-—- -7177- IL -717- i j : ��', 1 _ E31114 -------V&nut.PAFWK--- rF---------I it ' , P�V P _ - -- _�---J---_. _ Q I PN I IT---I 4 y , I 1 I � i I E r. I I - ------------------------------- ----------------------- -- - ------------ ---- ------ -------- - -------- ------------------------------------OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL ARTERIALJ---------------------- --- ------------------------------- T----- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------—---- i. T CREEA' r�?T I I•PLj,{l.Vly ... CENT R OF S. 2- LEGEND WEST WiNDS COMMUNITY PROPOSED ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED TRAL SMU NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. -------------- PROPOSED PROPOSED LOT UNE EASE14ENT GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PROPOSED ROAD CENTERUNE -N- r--= PROPOSED PARKS WKM Engineering Inc. DOSTING WETILMOS PROJECT PHA SING WicChemeyftfeskixil Bldg. 601 NWw Dr.,Suffe 2 DIA GRA M BoiemomMT59715 (46)586.M 200 0 200 FIGURE 2.4 FAX(406)586-1730 acd# fat DATE-- FEB.27.2004 PROEU NO.04SO67.il0 C4p)rlot 0 2004 HKW Enginewing b'&.AN RIghte Resuved. CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT W Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 � 20 East Olive Street fox 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net June 2,2004 Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Drive, Suite 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 Re: #Z-04050 West Winds PUD #P-04009 West Winds MaSub On Monday, May 24, 2004 the City Commission conditionally approved the Planned Unit Development and Major Subdivision applications for the unified development plan of a 161.30 acre subdivision for the development of 213 single-household, 92 townhouse, 5 multi-household and 8 senior assisted living lots with the following requested relaxations from the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance: a) Section 18.50.020 "Park Requirements" to allow the area requirement to be based on 11%net buildable area instead of 0.03 acres per dwelling unit for the affordable housing lots; b) Section 18.16.020.B "Authorized Uses" to allow'assisted living/elderly care facilities and apartments within the "R-3" zoning district; c) Section 18.42.030.0"Double/Through and Reverse Frontage" to allow double frontage lots adjacent to the arterial and collector streets; d) 18.42.040.B "Block Length" to allow the block lengths to exceed 400 feet; e) Section 18.42.040.0 "Block Width" to allow the minimum block length to be less than 200 feet for the blocks with Restricted Size Lots; f) Section 18.42.180.0 "Number of Restricted Size Lots Required" to allow the townhouse Restricted Size Lots to be less than 3,000 square feet and more than 3,000 for corner townhouse lots; and g) Section 18.44.090.D.3 "Spacing Standards for Drive Accesses" to allow residential lots that front on Hunter's Way and Buckrake and back onto the linear park to access local streets within 150 feet of an intersection with an arterial street and to allow the proposed access separation distance between the proposed local streets onto Oak Street, an arterial street,to be separated less than 660 feet. In addition,the City Commission conditionally approved the subdivision of 31.05 acres, as Phase 1A and 1B of the 161.30 acre parcel, into 46 single-household, 40 townhouse and 2 multi-household lots and a 129.25 acre remainder. The property is legally described as NWl/4, Section 2, T2S,R5E, Gallatin County,Montana, and located between Baxter Lane, Oak Street, 27t'Avenue and Fowler Avenue. The proposal was evaluated against the review criteria and requirements of the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The City Commission's decision was based on the fact that, with conditions, the proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance and the adopted Growth Policy. The decision of the City Commission is final. The conditions of approval are as follows: planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination Planned Unit Development: 1. A trail shall be constructed connecting from 27' Avenue to Davis Lane away from streets and in addition to the sidewalk to provide a future connection between Rose Park and the Regional Park. 2. Mid-block trail crossing along Oak Street will not be permitted 3. Hunters Way (from Baxter Lane to Oak Street) shall include a Signed Bike Route since this will be an extension of an existing Signed Bike Route on Hunters Way. 4. The Home Owners Association shall be responsible for maintenance of Park, park fixtures, trails, etc.,until such time that a Park Maintenance District, or similar form of funding,is established. 5. A park master plan shall be submitted for approval by the City Parks Division with the Phase I Final Plat and/or Final Site Plan,whichever comes first. 6. The Final Site Plan, including a Final Park Plan, shall be subject to review by the Design Review Board and final approval by the City Commission. 7. The Final Site Plan shall include elaborated architectural guidelines with streetscape and entry details. 8. . A building configuration plan shall be submitted for townhouse lots with subsequent subdivision phases. 9. The Covenants and Design Guidelines must state the means in which building orientation will be mitigated along the arterial and collector streets. The lots shall provide a front porch or false facade, a sidewalk connection to each building, and the covenants shall prohibit the construction of fences unless constructed less than 4 feet tall with a coordinated design for all of the lots backing up to Oak Street, Baxter Lane,27'Avenue and Davis Lane. 10. The declaration of covenants for the subdivision must be included and recorded with the Final Plat. The City of Bozeman shall be party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. The covenants shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. The storm water detention ponds shall be designed in a more organic form and landscaped as a water feature with 6" river rock and wet root tolerant plant types. 12. A one foot "no access" easement shall be provided along Baxter Lane, Oak Street, 27`''Avenue and Davis Lane. 13. No lots shall be platted within the watercourse and wetland setback. 14. The 0.07 acre isolated wetland in the southeast corner of the subdivision may be filled in exchange for the existing vegetation being transplanted, as reasonably feasible, from the filled wetland to the Cattail Creek wetlands,under the direct supervision of the wetland consultant. 15. At least 70% of the park perimeter shall be adjacent to a public street to allow for accessibility to the park. Page 2 16. The applicant shall provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office an executed Waiver of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Signalization of the intersection of W Oak Street and North 27`h Avenue. b. Signalization of the intersection of W Oak Street and Fowler Avenue. c. Signalization of the intersection of Baxter Lane and North 27`h Avenue. d. Signalization of the intersection of Baxter Lane and Fowler Avenue. e. Fowler Avenue trunk sewer main improvements. The document filed shall specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property,taxable valuation of the property,traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. 17. As a part of the infrastructure plans submittal, 100-year flood elevations shall be computed for the Section-Line Ditch and the center irrigation lateral (stream defined as Cattail Creek by the Conservation District and as Harmon Ditch from Harvest Creek), and the limits of flooding identified Lots shall not be platted within the 100 year flood plain. Hydraulic calculations and the water surface profile of the ditches shall take into account the upstream and downstream culvert capacities as well as the fact the ditch company may use the ditch as a blow-off at any time and without notice. 18. Additional information is needed prior to approval of the Phase I improvements. The Traffic Study Report shall include an analysis of possible warrants at all the proposed intersections with Oak Street. The Traffic Study Report shall also address pedestrian crossing issues at the intersection of Oak Street and N 27"Avenue and make recommendations for approval. 19. The applicant is advised that Baxter Road, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development,to one half of a minor arterial standard as shown in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update and shall match the section built by Baxter Meadows. West Oak Street, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development,to one half of a principal arterial standard and shall match the section built by Harvest Creek. North 27"h Avenue, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development, to one half of a collector standard and shall match the section built by Harvest Creek. Fowler Avenue, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development, to one half of a minor arterial standard.Where one half of a standard collector or arterial is being built 12 feet of pavement for the opposing lane of travel shall be provided. City standard curb and gutter, and 6 foot wide sidewalk will be required in the standard location on the development's side of the street. Detailed review of the street and intersection design, and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. 20. Tschache Lane shall align with the road in Baxter Meadows west of Fowler Avenue. 21. Parking will not be allowed on W.Oak Street,North 27`s Avenue, Baxter Lane, and Fowler Avenue. 22. The Section Line Ditch shall not be piped The "riparian" corridor shall be maintained within the median planned for Fowler Avenue. Page 3 r 23. No existing mature vegetation within the watercourse setback,wetlands,park and along the Section Line Ditch shall be removed from the site unless approved by the City of Bozeman Planning Office. The Final Landscape Plan shall depict existing and proposed vegetation as well as proposed vegetation to be removed. 24. Buildings proposed for construction with crawl spaces or basements shall include Engineer Certification regarding depth of ground water and soil conditions and proposed mitigation methods to be submitted with each Building Permit. 25. The 60 footwide trail area, along Tschache Lane, shall be extended along the north side of Tschache Lane to the Whisper Avenue intersection. 26. The 9 lots on the west side of Whisper Avenue that are directly adjacent to the park shall be removed 27. The Section 42 Affordable Housing and the Assisted Living, as depicted in the plan, shall remain in the PUD plan. 28. More detailed Development Guidelines shall be provided with the Final PUD Plan. 29. The subdivision shall provide for a better mix of housing types throughout the subdivision and shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board and a final approval by the City Commision. 30. The mandatory 25 foot trail easement for the transportation pathways will not count towards the dedicated parkland. Any additional width provided along the trail easement can be counted towards the dedicated parkland requirement. 31. The City of Bozeman will accept the 11% calculation for parkland dedication for the affordable Section 42 housing lots so long as it includes some very low income housing. 32. The parkland shall be configured to provide adequate space for soccer fields along Whisper Avenue and Buckrake Avenue. 33. The applicant shall reconsider the arterial treatment on Baxter Lane. The City Commission des not support the la7 areas of open space along the arterial strew 34. A density cap shall be applied to the build out of the subdivision. The cap will be based on the total number of acres of dedicated parkland provided. 35. The interconnectivity of streets on the eastern part of the neighborhood shall reflect the interconnectivity shown on the western portion of the subdivision. Identified Code Provisions • The bollard lights that are required at the intersection of pathways with streets must meet the City's specifications. • A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development Page 4 or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in 18.42.100. • A proportionate amount of parkland, open space and restricted size lots, to meet the general standards and the PUD regulations, shall be noted with each Final Plat and Final Plan. • Plans and Specifications for the trail will need to be reviewed by the Parks Department prior to construction. • Baxter Lane (from Fowler Avenue to N. 27' Avenue) should include a Bike Lane in accordance with the Bike Route Network (Figure 6-4) in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan,which calls for a Bike Lane for the entire extent of Baxter Lane. • Fowler Avenue (from Baxter Lane to Oak Street) should include a Bike Lane in accordance with the ' Bike Route Network (Figure 6-4) in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan,which calls for a Bike Lane for the entire extent of Davis Lane. • North 27`h Avenue (from Baxter Lane to Oak Street) should include a Bike Lane to provide connectivity to other planned Bicycle Facilities in the area. The Board feels that this connection will be a vital alternative to travel on 19' once it is completed. • The Board also recommends that the proposed park land include a ten foot Bike Path (shared-use path). The Path will be an extension of an existing trail to the south and will provide a vital connection to the trial system. The Board suggests the construction material be consistent with what the development wants (i.e., paved OR dirt) in order to be consistent with the surrounding park land. • The subdivider shall be responsible for installing sod, boulevard trees and an irrigation system in the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external subdivision.streets and adjacent to subdivision parks or other open space areas. • A trail shall be constructed connecting both North and South ends of the subdivision via the streambed and through the Park. • All park and trail design and construction shall be approved by the City Parks Division and shall meet City standards. • All trail corridors are to be 25 feet in width, as stated in the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, chapter 18.50, section 18.50.070. All Park and Trail plans and construction shall be approved by the City Parks Division. • Each lot shall meet the minimum lot area standards, including the multi-household lots, for an "R- 3" zoned lot unless an alternative zoning designation is approved through a Zone Map Amendment. Page 5 • Construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Home Owners Association Architectural Committee prior to submitting a site plan application or a building permit application, whichever comes first. The plans shall include a stamp of approval from the Architectural Committee prior to City review. This language shall be incorporated into the Covenants for the subdivision. • A Comprehensive Sign Plan for the entire subdivision shall be provided with the final site plan. There should be a general theme to the style of signs permitted within the PUD and shall include information regarding the materials, colors and illumination. • Storm water ponds shall not exceed 1/3 of the area of the front yard setback adjacent to the external streets. • Storm water cannot be discharged into an active ditch. Storm water discharged into a stream requires the necessary permitting. • If Concurrent Construction is requested with other phases of the subdivision then it must be explicitly requested in the narrative submitted with the Preliminary Plat application. • The Improvements Agreement with a financial guarantee, the Hold Harmless and the Conditional Use Permit shall be signed, notarized and recorded with the Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to installation of required infrastructure. • Proposed phasing shall be depicted on the final plan. The full extent of all proposed infrastructure improvements required for each phase shall also be clearly indicated on the final plan submittal.No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Chapters 18.36 and 18.74 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Phases shall be numbered in the order in which they are to be built. • A Stormwater Master Plan for the PUD for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general storm drainage and grading concept has been reviewed, the submitted data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. • The maximum water depth and basin depth shown in the Storm water report does not meet the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and will need to be modified. Detailed review of the final grading and drainage plan and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. • While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm water retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the final site plan for each lot and/or phase. • The applicant shall obtain and provide evidence of permission from the appropriate ditch companies to discharge storm runoff into the ditches, and for any relocation or abandonment of the ditches. Page 6 • In locations where Baxter Lane and Fowler Avenue are being improved, the various irrigation ditches and/or streams shall be either relocated outside the right-of-way, accommodated in an approved center median,or placed in a pipe. • A comprehensive utilities design report for water and sewer main extensions, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general utilities design concept has been reviewed, the submitted data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. • At a number of locations, the manhole spacing shown exceeds the maximum manhole spacing, per the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. The manhole barrel size is 60" for a 20" sanitary sewer pipe, per the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. Use of the 10" main to allow a flatter slope does not meet DEQ requirements and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. • All water main extensions of more than 500 feet required for any phase of the development shall be fully looped Water and sewer mains shall be extended to the property lines to adequately accommodate future extensions and/or looping. • Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions for each proposed phase, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Sewer and Water plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Chapters 18.36 and 18.74 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. • All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of-way and provisions for bicyclists shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Crater Boza m Area Transportation An 2001 Update, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. While the typical sections and calming strategies included in this submittal provide an acceptable general framework for the development, detailed review and approval of street, sidewalk and associated storm drainage infrastructure will be part of the plan and specification review process for each phase. • Plans and Specifications for streets and storm drainage facilities for each phase, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Page 7 Commission under the provisions of Chapters 18.36 and 18.74 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. • All street names shall be reviewed and approved by the Gallatin County Road Office and City Engineering Office. • The following locations shall be modified to meet the access standards in Section 090.D.3 of Chapter 18.44 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance: a. On Oak Street, the separation between Windward Avenue and Hunter's Way meets the criteria for partial access but does not provide the 660' minimum for full access; b. The following locations provide less than the 150' minimum for an access from an intersection with an arterial: (1) the location of Spring View Court from Fowler Avenue; and(2) a proposed access on east side of Buckrake Avenue from Baxter Lane; c. On Fowler Avenue, the separation between the streets meets the criteria for partial access but does not provide the 660' minimum for full access. On Baxter Lane, the separation between Windward Avenue and Hunter's Way meets the criteria for partial access but does not provide the 660' minimum for full access. The Traffic Impact Study shall address the left turn movement onto the subdivision streets from Fowler Avenue and Baxter Lane. • Detailed review and approval of the concurrent construction plans will be part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. Building permits may not be issued until each plan is approved • The Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks, SCS,Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310,404,Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained • Building Permits will be issued incrementally dependent upon the status of installation of infrastructure improvements. • The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. • The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within one year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. • A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. Page 8 The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Major Subdivision Plat: 1. Phase 1A and 1B of the West Winds Subdivision shall comply with the approved Planned Unit Development. 2. The final plat shall include a notation that due to high ground water conditions full or partial basements are not recommended 3. Cash-in-lieu of Water Rights, as calculated by the Director of Public Service, shall be paid at the time the Final Plat is submitted. 4. The property owner has proposed that Lot 7 of Phase 1A will be developed with an affordable housing project in order to meet the Performance Points for a Planned Unit Development. The final plat shall note that Lot 7 is reserved for affordable housing. The plat shall also note that in the event the lot does not get developed with affordable housing that the property owner shall provide an alternative means to meet the Planned Unit Performance standards. 5. The final plat shall contain a note prohibiting direct access from single family or duplex lots to Oak Street and N.27`h Avenue. 6. The west half of N 27' Avenue, from Oak Street to Breeze Lane, and the north half of Oak Street, from N 27�' Avenue to Hunters Way must be constructed and accepted by the City prior to filing the Final Plat for Phase 1A. The west half of N 27' Avenue, from Tschache Lane to Breeze Lane must be constructed and accepted by the City prior to filing the Final Plat for Phase 1B. The overall design of Oak Street shall include a detailed assessment of traffic needs and design solutions for the phasing. The timing of the development of Harvest Creek shall be taken into account as well. The Phase 1A infrastructure improvements shall include improvements to the intersection of Oak Street and N 27' Avenue to provide a transition between the existing and the future roadway. Design of the intersection is also to accommodate the existing overhead power lines. The intersection design will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Office as a part of the infrastructure improvements review process. 7. There is a discrepancy between Traffic Impact Studies provided for the North 19'' Avenue and Durston Road intersection regarding the Level of Service. If it is confirmed the intersection operates below Level of Service D, then the Final Plat for Phase 1 may not be filed until the improvements necessary to raise the Level of Service at the intersection of North 19`h Avenue and Durston Road to Level of Service C are installed and accepted by the City of Bozeman. Identified Code Provisions • The Restricted Size Lots shall be noted on the Final Plat. • As recommended by the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO), a professional cultural resource inventory of the site shall be conducted by a qualified archeologist. The results of said survey must be provided to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of any infrastructure plans and specifications. Page 9 • Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds and a copy provided to the Planning Department. • If approved for Concurrent Construction the property owner shall comply with items 1-12 of Section 18.74.030.D. • Conditional approval of the preliminary plat shall be in force for not more than three calendar years, as provided by state statute. Prior to that expiration date, the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. • If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply.the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. • The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required certificates. The final plat application shall include four (4) signed reproducible copies on a stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 31h-inch floppy disk or compact disk; and five (5) paper prints. • Storm Water Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general storm drainage and grading concept has been reviewed, the submitted data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. • Stormwater generated by the proposed subdivision which discharges to any privately owned ditch must have the written permission of the ditch owner. • The Developer's engineer has provided a comprehensive Design Report evaluating existing capacity of water and sewer utilities for the entire West Winds P.U.D... Detailed review and approval of the Design Report will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review and approval process. • The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and all easements shall be clearly and accurately depicted on the plans and specs, as well as all nearby fire hydrants and proposed fire hydrants. • Any easements needed for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width.While the final location of the water and sewer mains will be determined once the final street Page 10 widths are approved, in no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of the easement All necessary easements shall be provided prior to final plat approval and shall be shown on the plat. Wherever water and/or sewer mains are not located under or accessed from improved streets, a 12 foot wide all weather access drive shall be constructed above the utilities to provide necessary access. • Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Water and sewer plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless approved for concurrent construction. • Any street rights of way which are within the boundaries of this subdivision and for which easements were provided with the XL Limited Partnership Annexation Agreement shall be dedicated to the City on the Final Plat for this subdivision. • A detailed Traffic Study Report for the entire West Winds Development has been provided to and reviewed by the City Engineer's office. Additional information is needed prior to approval of the Phase I improvements. The Traffic Study Report shall include an analysis of possible warrants at all the proposed intersections with Oak Street. The Traffic Study Report shall also address pedestrian crossing issues at the intersection of Oak Street and N 27`h Avenue and make recommendations for approval. The need for any traffic impact analysis updates will be identified at the time of Pre-Application submittal for each subsequent phase. • Street names must be approved by the City Engineer and county road office. • City standard curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be provided along all streets in the subdivision. Per Chapter 18.44.080 of the Unified Development Ordinance, sidewalks will be installed prior to occupancy of any individual lots. • The applicant is advised that the installation of any traffic calming devices will be considered in detail and approved if appropriate during the infrastructure plan and specification review process. • All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of-way and provisions for bicyclists shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the GwierBoze nan Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update,unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. • Plans and Specifications for streets and storm drainage facilities, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted No building permits shall be issued prior to City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless approved for concurrent construction. Page 11 • Project phasing shall be clearly defined on the infrastructure plans and specifications including installation of infrastructure. • The location of mailboxes shall be coordinated with the City Engineering Department prior to their installation. • The Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks, SCS,Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to plan and specification approval. • If construction activities related to the project result in the disturbance of more than 1 acre of natural ground, an erosion/sediment control plan may be required. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality may need to be contacted by the Applicant to determine if a Stormwater Discharge Permit is necessary. If a permit is required by the State, the Developer shall demonstrate to the City full permit compliance. The final plat shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance unless granted a relaxation through the Planned Unit Development process. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. FYI: The City Commission indicated interest in having the covenants identify a better park boundary delineation through the use of vegetation as a buffer and barrier for the lots that back up to the park. The applicant should work with the Parks Department to determine the most suitable vegetation for this purpose. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the conditions, code provisions, or the final site plan approval process. Respectfully, Jami Morris Associate Planner JM/jm Enclosure cc: HKM Engineering Inc., 601 Nikles Drive, Suite 2,Bozeman,MT 59715 Page 12 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR WEST WINDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOUND BY BAXTER LANE, OAK STREET,27TH AVENUE AND FOWLER AVENUE, BOZEMAN,MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the Cityof Bozeman to establish a unified development plan of a 161.30 acre subdivision for the development of 213 single-household,92 townhouse,5 multi-household and 8 senior assisted living lots with the following requested relaxations from the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance: a) Section 18.50.020 "Park Requirements" to allow the area requirement to be based on 11% net buildable area instead of 0.03 acres per dwelling unit for the affordable housing lots; b) Section 18.16.0203 "Authorized Uses" to allow assisted living/elderly care facilities and apartments within the "R 3" zoning district; c) Section 18.42.030.0"Double/Through and Reverse Frontage" to allow double frontage lots adjacent to the arterial and collector streets; d) 18.42.040.B `Block Length" to allow the block lengths to. exceed 400 feet;e) Section 18.42.040.0"Block Width" to-allow the minimum block length to be less than 200 feet for the blocks with Restricted Size Lots;f) Section 18.42.180.0"Number of Restricted Size Lots Required" to allow the townhouse Restricted Size Lots to be less than 3,000 square feet and more than 3,000 for corner townhouse lots;and g) Section 18.44.090.D.3 "Spacing Standards for Drive Accesses"to allow residential lots that fronton Hunter's Way and Buckrake and back onto the linear park to access local streets within 150 feet of an intersection with an arterial street and to allow the proposed access separation distance between the proposed local streets onto Oak Street,an arterial street,to be separated less than 660 feet. WHEREAS,the subject property is legally described as the NWl/, Section 2, T2S,R5E, Gallatin County,Montana; and West Winds PUD #Z-04050 PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure and shall constitute restrictions running with the land. WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following thirty-five (35) conditions: 1. A trail shall be constructed connecting from 27th Avenue to Davis Lane away from streets and in addition to the sidewalk to provide a future connection between Rose Park and the Regional Park. 2. Mid-block trail crossing along Oak Street will not be permitted. 3. Hunters Way(from Baxter Lane to Oak Street)shall include a Signed Bike Route since this will be an extension of an existing Signed Bike Route on Hunters Way. 4. The Home Owners Association shall be responsible for maintenance of Park,park fixtures,trails, etc., until such time that a Park Maintenance District, or similar form of funding, is established. 5. A park master plan shall be submitted for approval by the City Parks Division with the Phase I Final Plat and/or Final Site Plan, whichever comes first. 6. The Final Site Plan, including a Final Park Plan, shall be subject to review by the Design Review Board and final approval by the City Commission. 7. The Final Site Plan shall include elaborated architectural guidelines with streetscape and entry details. 8. A building configuration plan shall be submitted for townhouse lots with subsequent subdivision phases. 9. The Covenants and Design Guidelines must state the means in which building orientation will be mitigated along the arterial and collector streets. The lots shall provide a front porch or false fagade,a sidewalk connection to each building,and the covenants shall prohibit the construction of fences unless constructed less than 4 feet tall with a coordinated design for all of the lots backing up to Oak Street,Baxter Lane, 27th Avenue and Davis Lane. 10. The declaration of covenants for the subdivision must be included and recorded with the Final Plat. The City of Bozeman shall be parry to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. The covenants shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. West Winds PUD #Z-04050 PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11. The storm water detention ponds shall be designed in a more organic form and landscaped as a water feature with 6" river rock and wet root tolerant plant types. 12. A one foot"no access" easement shall be provided along Baxter Lane,Oak Street,27th Avenue and Davis Lane. 13. No lots shall be platted within the watercourse and wetland setback. 14. The 0.07 acre isolated wetland in the southeast corner of the subdivision maybe filled in exchange for the existing vegetation being transplanted,as reasonably feasible,fromthe filled wetland to the Cattail Creek wetlands, under the direct supervision of the wetland consultant. 15. At least 70% of the park perimeter shall be adjacent to a public street to allow for accessibility to the park 16. The applicant shall provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office an executed Waiver of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Signalization of the intersection of W Oak Street and North 27th Avenue. b. Signalization of the intersection of W Oak Street and Fowler Avenue. c. Signalization of the intersection of Baxter Lane and North 27th Avenue. d. Signalization of the intersection of Baxter Lane and Fowler Avenue. e. Fowler Avenue trunk sewer main improvements. The document filed shall specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property,taxable valuation of the property,traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. 17. As a part of the infrastructure plans submitta1, 100-year flood elevations shall be computed for the Section-Line Ditch and the center irrigation lateral (stream defined as Cattail Creek by the Conservation District and as Harmon Ditch from Harvest Creek), and the limits of flooding identified.Lots shall not be platted within the 100 year flood plain. Hydraulic calculations and the water surface profile of the ditches shall take into account the upstream and downstream culvert capacities as well as the fact the ditch company may use the ditch as a blow-off at anytime and without notice. 18. Additional information is needed prior to approval of the Phase I improvements.The Traffic Study Report shall include an analysis of possible warrants at all the proposed intersections with Oak Street.The Traffic Study Report shall also address pedestrian crossing issues at the intersection of Oak Street and N 27th Avenue and make recommendations for approval. West Winds PUD #Z-04050 PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 19. The applicant is advised that Baxter Road,along the property boundary,shall be improved,as part. of this development, to one half of a minor arterial standard as shown in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update and shall match the section built by Baxter Meadows.West Oak Street, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development,to one half of a principal arterial standard and shall match the section built by Harvest Creek North 27th Avenue,along the property boundary,shall be improved,as part of this development,to one half of a collector standard and shall match the section built by Harvest Creek Fowler Avenue,along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development, to one half of a minor arterial standard. Where one half of a standard collector or arterial is being built 12 feet of pavement for the opposing lane of travel shall be provided. City standard curb and gutter, and 6 foot wide sidewalk will be required in the standard location on the development's side of the street. Detailed review of the street and intersection design, and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. 20. Tschache Lane shall align with the road in Baxter Meadows west of Fowler Avenue. 21. Parking will not be allowed on W. Oak Street, North 27th Avenue, Baxter Lane, and Fowler Avenue. 22. The Section Line Ditch shall not be piped. The "riparian" corridor shall be maintained within the median planned for Fowler Avenue. 23. No existing mature vegetation within the watercourse setback,wetlands,park and along the Section Line Ditch shall be removed from the site unless approved by the City of Bozeman Planning Office. The Final Landscape Plan shall depict existing and proposed vegetation as well as proposed vegetation to be removed. 24. Buildings proposed for construction with crawl spaces or basements shall include Engineer Certification regarding depth of ground water and soil conditions and proposed mitigation methods to be submitted with each Building Permit. 25. The 60 foot wide trail area, along Tschache Lane, shall be extended along the north side of Tschache Lane to the Whisper Avenue intersection. 26. The 9 lots on the west side of Whisper Avenue that are directly adjacent to the park shall be removed. 27. The Section 42 Affordable Housing and the Assisted Living,as depicted in the plan,shall remain in the PUD plan. 28. More detailed Development Guidelines shall be provided with the Final PUD Plan. 29. The subdivision shall provide for a better mix of housing types throughout the subdivision and shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board and a final approval by the City Commision. West Winds PUD #Z-04050 PAGE 4 N CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 30. The mandatory 25 foot trail easement for the transportation pathways will not count towards the dedicated parkland. Any additional width provided along the trail easement can be counted towards the dedicated parkland requirement. 31. The City of Bozeman will accept the 11% calculation for parkland dedication for the affordable Section 42 housing lots so long as it includes some very low income housing. 32. The parkland shall be configured to provide adequate space for soccer fields along Whisper Avenue and Buckrake Avenue. 33. The applicant shall reconsider the arterial treatment on Baxter Lane. The City Con rission chef not support the lade areas of open space along the arsenal stets. 34. A density cap shall be applied to the build out of the subdivision. The cap will be based on the total number of acres of dedicated parkland provided. 35. The interconnectivity of streets on the eastern part of the neighborhood shall reflect the interconnectivity shown on the western portion of the subdivision. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted thirty-five (35) conditions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me,the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is developed under the terms and conditions established by the City Commission in their approval of the West Winds Planned Unit Development. DATED THIS DAY OF , 20 West Winds PUD #Z-04050 PAGE 5 r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDOWNER QUEST WEST, L.L.C. by John Dunlap Managing Member STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of ,2004, before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared John Dunlap, known to me to be the Manag_in Member of Quest West,L.L.C,the company that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged tome that he executed the same for and on behalf of said company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Printed Name Notary Public for State of Montana Residing at: Bozeman,Montana Commission Expires: (Use 4 digits for expiration year) West Winds PUD #Z-04050 PAGE 6 CITY OF BOZEMAN `" DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net June 2, 2004 Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Drive, Suite 4 Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: #Z-04050 West Winds PUD #P-04009 West Winds MaSub On Monday, May 24, 2004 the City Commission conditionally approved the Planned Unit Development and Major Subdivision applications for the unified development plan of a 161.30 acre subdivision for the development of 213 single-household, 92 townhouse, 5 multi-household and 8 senior assisted living lots with the following requested relaxations from the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance: a) Section 18.50.020 "Park Requirements" to allow the area requirement to be based on 11% net buildable area instead of 0.03 acres per dwelling unit for the affordable housing lots; b) Section 18.16.020.B "Authorized Uses" to allow assisted living/elderly care facilities and apartments within the "R-3" zoning district; c) Section 18.42.030.0 "Double/Through and Reverse Frontage" to allow double frontage lots adjacent to the arterial and collector streets; d) 18.42.040.B "Block Length" to allow the block lengths to exceed 400 feet; e) Section 18.42.040.0 "Block Width" to allow the minimum block length to be less than 200 feet for the blocks with Restricted Size Lots; f) Section 18.42.180.0 "Number of Restricted Size Lots Required" to allow the townhouse Restricted Size Lots to be less than 3,000 square feet and more than 3,000 for corner townhouse lots; and g) Section 18.44.090.D.3 "Spacing Standards for Drive accesses" to allow residential lots that front on Hunter's Way and Buckrake and back onto the linear park to access local streets within 150 feet of an intersection with an arterial street and to allow the proposed access separation distance between the proposed local streets onto Oak Street, an arterial street, to be separated less than 660 feet. I In addition, the City Commission condi6,.onally approved the subdivision of 31.05 acres, as Phase 1A and 1B of the 160.30 acre parcel, into 46 single-household, 40 townhouse and 2 multi-household lots and a 129.25 acre remainder. The property is legally described as NW'/a, Section 2,T2S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana, and located between Baxter Lane, Oak Street, 27`h Avenue and Davis Lane. The proposal was evaluated against the review criteria and requirements of the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The City Commission's decision was based on the fact that, with conditions, the proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance and the adopted Growth Policy. The decision of the City Commission is final. The conditions of approval are as follows: planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination Planned Unit Development: 1. A trail shall be constructed connecting from 27`' Avenue to Davis Lane away from streets and in addition to the sidewalk to provide a future connection between Rose Park and the Regional Park 2. No mid-block trail crossings shall be permitted. 3. Hunters Way(from Baxter Lane to Oak Street) shall include a Signed Bike Route since this will be an extension of an existing Signed Bike Route on Hunters Way. 4. The Home Owners Association shall be responsible for maintenance of Park, park fixtures, trails, etc.,until such time that a Park Maintenance District, or similar form of funding,is established. 5. A park master plan shall be submitted for approval by the City Parks Division with the Phase I Final Plat and/or Final Site Plan,whichever comes first. 6. The Final Site Plan, including a Final Park Plan, shall be subject to review by the Design Review Board prior to City Commission review and approval. 7. The Final Site Plan shall include elaborated architectural guidelines with streetscape and entry details. 8. A building configuration plan shall be submitted for townhouse lots with subsequent subdivision phases. 9. The Covenants and Design Guidelines must state the means in which building orientation will be mitigated along the arterial and collector streets. The lots shall provide a front porch or false fagade, a sidewalk connection to each building, and the covenants shall prohibit the construction of fences unless constructed less than 4 feet tall with a coordinated design for all of the lots backing up to Oak Street,Baxter Lane,27`h Avenue and Davis Lane. 10. The declaration of covenants for the subdivision must be included and recorded with the Final Plat. The City of Bozeman shall be party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. The covenants shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. The storm water detention ponds shall be designed in a more organic form and landscaped as a water feature with 6" river rock and wet root tolerant plant types. 12. A one foot "no access" easement shall be provided along Baxter Lane, Oak Street, 27`h Avenue and Davis Lane. 13. No lots shall be platted within the watercourse and wetland setback 14. The 0.07 acre isolated wetland in the southeast corner of the subdivision may be filled in exchange for the existing vegetation being transplanted, as reasonably feasible, from the filled wetland to the Cattail Creek wetlands, under the direct supervision of the wetland consultant. 15. At least 70% of the park perimeter shall be adjacent to a public street to allow for accessibility to the park Page 2 16. The applicant shall provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office an executed Waiver of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) for the following: a. Signalization of the intersection of W Oak Street and North 27`'Avenue. b. Signalization of the intersection of W Oak Street and Fowler Avenue. c. Signalization of the intersection of Baxter Lane and North 27`'Avenue. d. Signalization of the intersection of Baxter Lane and Fowler Avenue. e. Fowler Avenue trunk sewer main improvements. The document filed shall specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. 17. As a part of the infrastructure plans submittal, 100-year flood elevations shall be computed for the Section-Line Ditch and the center irrigation lateral (stream defined as Cattail Creek by the Conservation District and as Harmon Ditch from Harvest Creek), and the limits of flooding identified. Lots shall not be platted within the 100 year flood plain. Hydraulic calculations and the water surface profile of the ditches shall take into account the upstream and downstream culvert capacities as well as the fact the ditch company may use the ditch as a blow-off at any time and without notice. 18. Additional information is needed prior to approval of the Phase I improvements. The Traffic Study Report shall include an analysis of possible warrants at all the proposed intersections with Oak Street. The Traffic Study Report shall also address pedestrian crossing issues at the intersection of Oak Street and N 27`h Avenue and make recommendations for approval. 19. The applicant is advised that Baxter Road, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development,to one half of a minor arterial standard as shown in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update and shall match the section built by Baxter Meadows. West Oak Street, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development, to one half of a principal arterial standard and shall match the section built by Harvest Creek North 27`h Avenue, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development, to one half of a collector standard and shall match the section built by Harvest Creek Fowler Avenue, along the property boundary, shall be improved, as part of this development, to one half of a minor arterial standard. Where one half of a standard collector or arterial is being built 12 feet of pavement for the opposing lane of travel shall be provided. City standard curb and gutter, and 6 foot wide sidewalk will be required in the standard location on the development's side of the street. Detailed review of the street and intersection design, and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. 20. Tschache Lane shall align with the road in Baxter Meadows west of Fowler Avenue. 21. Parking will not be allowed on W. Oak Street,North 27`h Avenue,Baxter Lane, and Fowler Avenue. 22. The Section Line Ditch shall not be piped. The "riparian" corridor shall be maintained within the median planned for Fowler Avenue. Page 3 23. No existing mature vegetation within the watercourse setback, wetlands, park and along the Section Line Ditch shall be removed from the site unless approved by the City of Bozeman Planning Office. The Final Landscape Plan shall depict existing and proposed vegetation as well as proposed vegetation to be removed. 24. Buildings proposed for construction with crawl spaces or basements shall include Engineer Certification regarding depth of ground water and soil conditions and proposed mitigation methods to be submitted with each Building Perinit. 25. The lots on the west side of Whisper Avenue that are directly adjacent to the park shall be removed. 26. The 60 foot wide trail area, along Tschache Lane, shall be extended along the north side of Tschache Lane to the Whisper Avenue intersection. 27. The mandatory 25 foot trail easement for the transportation pathways will not count towards the dedicated parkland. Any additional width provided along the trail easement can be counted towards the dedicated parkland requirement. 28. The subdivision shall provide for a mix of housing types throughout the subdivision. 29. The Section 42 Affordable Housing and the Senior Living areas shall remain in the PUD plan. 30. More detailed Development Guidelines shall be provided with the Final PUD Plan. 31. The subdivision shall be designed to allow adequate space for soccer fields to be constructed. 32. The City of Bozeman will accept the 11% parkland dedication for the affordable housing lots as long as they have provisions for very low income housing. 33. A subdivision redesign shall provide for better arterial treatment in regards to the depicted open space along the external streets. The City Commission expressed concern over the potential lack of maintenance of the large swaths of open space between the lots and external streets. 34. A density cap shall be applied to the build out of the subdivision. The cap will be based on the total number of acres of dedicated parkland provided. 35. The east half of the property shall provide greater interconnectivity and grid pattern. Identified Code Provisions • The bollard lights that are required at the intersection of pathways with streets must meet the City's specifications. • A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in 18.42.100. • A proportionate amount of parkland, open space and restricted size lots, to meet the general standards and the PUD regulations, shall be noted with each Final Plat and Final Plan. Page 4 • Plans and Specifications for the trail will need to be reviewed by the Parks Department prior to construction. • Baxter Lane (from Fowler Avenue to N. 27`h Avenue) should include a Bike Lane in accordance with the Bike Route Network(Figure 6-4) in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan,which calls for a Bike Lane for the entire extent of Baxter Lane. • Fowler Avenue (from Baxter Lane to Oak Street) should include a Bike Lane in accordance with the Bike Route Network(Figure 6-4) in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, which calls for a Bike Lane for the entire extent of Davis Lane. • North 27`h Avenue (from Baxter Lane to Oak Street) should include a Bike Lane to provide connectivity to other planned Bicycle Facilities in the area. The Board feels that this connection will be a vital alternative to travel on 19`h once it is completed. • The Board also recommends that the proposed park land include a ten foot Bike Path (shared-use path). The Path will be an extension of an existing trail to the south and will provide a vital connection to the trial system The Board suggests the construction material be consistent with what the development wants (i.e., paved OR dirt) in order to be consistent with the surrounding parkland. • The subdivider shall be responsible for installing sod, boulevard trees and an irrigation system in the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external subdivision streets and adjacent to subdivision parks or other open space areas. • A trail shall be constructed connecting both North and South ends of the subdivision via the streambed and through the Park. • All park and trail design and construction shall be approved by the City Parks Division and shall meet City standards. • All trail corridors are to be 25 feet in width, as stated in the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, chapter 18.50, section 18.50.070. All Park and Trail plans and construction shall be approved by the City Parks Division. • Each lot shall meet the minimum lot area standards, including the multi-household lots, for an "R 3" zoned lot unless an alternative zoning designation is approved through a Zone Map Amendment. • Construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Home Owners Association Architectural Committee prior to submitting a site plan application or a building permit application, whichever comes first. The plans shall include a stamp of approval from the Architectural Committee prior to City review. This language shall be incorporated into the Covenants for the subdivision. Page 5 • A Comprehensive Sign Plan for the entire subdivision shall be provided with the final site plan. There should be a general theme to the style of signs permitted within the PUD and shall include information regarding the materials,colors and illumination. • Storm water ponds shall not exceed 1/3 of the area of the front yard setback adjacent to the external streets. • Storm water cannot be discharged into an active ditch. Storm water discharged into a stream requires the necessary permitting. • If Concurrent Construction is requested with other phases of the subdivision then it must be explicitly requested in the narrative submitted with the Preliminary Plat application. • The Improvements Agreement with a financial guarantee, the Hold Harmless and the Conditional Use Permit shall be signed, notarized and recorded with the Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to installation of required infrastructure. • Proposed phasing shall be depicted on the final plan. The full extent of all proposed infrastructure improvements required for each phase shall also be clearly indicated on the final plan submittal. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Chapters 18.36 and 18.74 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Phases shall be numbered in the order in which they are to be built. • A Stormwater Master Plan for the PUD for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general storm drainage and grading concept has been reviewed, the submitted data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. • The maximum water depth and basin depth shown in the Storm water report does not meet the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and will need to be modified. Detailed review of the final grading and drainage plan and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. • While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm water retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the final site plan for each lot and/or phase. • The applicant shall obtain and provide evidence of permission from the appropriate ditch companies to discharge storm runoff into the ditches, and for any relocation or abandonment of the ditches. • In locations where Baxter Lane and Fowler Avenue are being improved, the various irrigation ditches and/or streams shall be either relocated outside the right-of-way, accommodated in an approved center median,or placed in a pipe. Page 6 • A comprehensive utilities design report for water and sewer main extensions, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general utilities design concept has been reviewed, the submitted data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. • At a number of locations, the manhole spacing shown exceeds the maximum manhole spacing, per the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. The manhole barrel size is 60" for a 20" sanitary sewer pipe, per the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. Use of the 10" main to allow a flatter slope does not meet DEQ requirements and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. • All water main extensions of more than 500 feet required for any phase of the development shall be fully looped. Water and sewer mains shall be extended to the property lines to adequately accommodate future extensions and/or looping. • Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions for each proposed phase,prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Sewer and Water plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Chapters 18.36 and 18.74 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. • All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of-way and provisions for bicyclists shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Gwer Boze nn A ma Transportation Plary 2001 Update, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. While the typical sections and calming strategies included in this submittal provide an acceptable general framework for the development, detailed review and approval of street, sidewalk and associated storm drainage infrastructure will be part of the plan and specification review process for each phase. • Plans and Specifications for streets and storm drainage facilities for each phase, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Chapters 18.36 and 18.74 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. • All street names shall be reviewed and approved by the Gallatin County Road Office and City Engineering Office. Page 7 • The following locations shall be modified to meet the access standards in Section 090.D.3 of Chapter 18.44 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance: a. On Oak Street, the separation between Windward Avenue and Hunter's Way meets the criteria for partial access but does not provide the 660' minimum for full access; b. The following locations provide less than the 150' minimum for an access from an intersection with an arterial: (1) the location of Spring View Court from Fowler Avenue; and (2) a proposed access on east side of Buckrake Avenue from Baxter Lane; c. On Fowler Avenue, the separation between the streets meets the criteria for partial access but does not provide the 660' minimum for full access. On Baxter Lane, the separation between Windward Avenue and Hunter's Way meets the criteria for partial access but does not provide the 660' minimum for full access. The Traffic Impact Study shall address the left turn movement onto the subdivision streets from Fowler Avenue and Baxter Lane. • Detailed review and approval of the concurrent construction plans will be part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. Building pernuits may not be issued until each plan is approved. • The Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks, SCS,Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e.,310,404, Turbidity exemption,etc.) shall be obtained. • Building Permits will be issued incrementally dependent upon the status of installation of infrastructure improvements. • The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. • The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within one year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. • A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAYBE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Page 8 Major Subdivision Plat 1. Phase 1A and 1B of the West Winds Subdivision shall comply with the approved Planned Unit Development. 2. The final plat shall include a notation that due to high ground water conditions full or partial basements are not recommended. 3. Cash-in-lieu of Water Rights, as calculated by the Director of Public Service, shall be paid at the time the Final Plat is submitted. 4. The property owner has proposed that Lot 7 of Phase 1A will be developed with an affordable housing project in order to meet the Performance Points for a Planned Unit Development. The final plat shall note that Lot 7 is reserved for affordable housing. The plat shall also note that in the event the lot does not get developed with affordable housing that the property owner shall provide an alternative means to meet the Planned Unit Performance standards. 5. The final plat shall contain a note prohibiting direct access from single family or duplex lots to Oak Street and N. 27" Avenue. 6. The west half of N 27`h Avenue, from Oak Street to Breeze Lane, and the north half of Oak Street, from N 27`h Avenue to Hunters Way must be constructed and accepted by the City prior to filing the Final Plat for Phase 1A. The west half of N 27`h Avenue, from Tschache Lane to Breeze Lane must be constructed and accepted by the City prior to filing the Final Plat for Phase 1B. The overall design of Oak Street shall include a detailed assessment of traffic needs and design solutions for the phasing. The timing of the development of Harvest Creek shall be taken into account as well. The Phase 1A infrastructure improvements shall include improvements to the intersection of Oak Street and N 27`h Avenue to provide a transition between the existing and the future roadway. Design of the intersection is also to accommodate the existing overhead power lines. The intersection design will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Office as a part of the infrastructure improvements review process. 7. There is a discrepancy between Traffic Impact Studies provided for the North 19`h Avenue and Durston Road intersection regarding the Level of Service. If it is confirmed the intersection operates below Level of Service D, then the Final Plat for Phase 1 may not be filed until the improvements necessary to raise the Level of Service at the intersection of North 19`h Avenue and Durston Road to Level of Service C are installed and accepted by the City of Bozeman. Identified Code Provisions • The Restricted Size Lots shall be noted on the Final Plat. • As recommended by the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO), a professional cultural resource inventory of the site shall be conducted by a qualified archeologist. The results of said survey must be provided to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of any infrastructure plans and specifications. Page 9 • Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds and a copy provided to the Planning Department. • If approved for Concurrent Construction the property owner shall comply with items 1-12 of Section 18.74.030.D. • Conditional approval of the preliminary plat shall be in force for not more than three calendar years, as provided by state statute. Prior to that expiration date, the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. • If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. • The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required certificates. The final plat application shall include four (4) signed reproducible copies on a stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 3'/z-inch floppy disk or compact disk, and five (5) paper prints. • Storm Water Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general storm drainage and grading concept has been reviewed, the submitted data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. • Stormwater generated by the proposed subdivision which discharges to any privately owned ditch must have the written permission of the ditch owner. • The Developer's engineer has provided a comprehensive Design Report evaluating existing capacity of water and sewer utilities for the entire West Winds P.U.D... Detailed review and approval of the Design Report will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review and approval process. • The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and all easements shall be clearly and accurately depicted on the plans and specs, as well as all nearby fire hydrants and proposed fire hydrants. • Any easements needed for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width. While the final location of the water and sewer mains will be determined once the final street widths are approved, in no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of the easement All necessary easements shall be provided prior to final plat approval and shall be shown on the plat. Page 10 Wherever water and/or sewer mains are not located under or accessed from improved streets, a 12 foot wide all weather access drive shall be constructed above the utilities to provide necessary access. • Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions,prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Water and sewer plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless approved for concurrent construction. • Any street rights of way which are within the boundaries of this subdivision and for which easements were provided with the XL Limited Partnership Annexation Agreement shall be dedicated to the City on the Final Plat for this subdivision. • A detailed Traffic Study Report for the entire West Winds Development has been provided to and reviewed by the City Engineer's office. Additional information is needed prior to approval of the Phase I improvements. The Traffic Study Report shall include an analysis of possible warrants at all the proposed intersections with Oak Street. The Traffic Study Report shall also address pedestrian crossing issues at the intersection of Oak Street and N 27`h Avenue and make recommendations for approval. The need for any traffic impact analysis updates will be identified at the time of Pre-Application submittal for each subsequent phase. • Street names must be approved by the City Engineer and county road office. • City standard curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be provided along all streets in the subdivision. Per Chapter 18.44.080 of the Unified Development Ordinance, sidewalks will be installed prior to occupancy of any individual lots. • The applicant is advised that the installation of any traffic calming devices will be considered in detail and approved if appropriate during the infrastructure plan and specification review process. • All typical street sections,including sidewalk location within the right-of-way and provisions for bicyclists shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the G eaterBozermn A rea Transportation Plan, 2001 Update,unless otherwise approved by the City Commission,or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. • Plans and Specifications for streets and storm drainage facilities, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer(PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless approved for concurrent construction. Page 11 3 • Project phasing shall be clearly defined on the infrastructure plans and specifications including installation of infrastructure. • The location of mailboxes shall be coordinated with the City Engineering Department prior to their installation. • The Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks, SCS,Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc) shall be obtained prior to plan and specification approval. • If construction activities related to the project result in the disturbance of more than 1 acre of natural ground, an erosion/sediment control plan may be required. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality may need to be contacted by the Applicant to determine if a Stormwater Discharge Permit is necessary. If a permit is required by the State, the Developer shall demonstrate to the Cityfull permit compliance. The final plat shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance unless granted a relaxation through the Planned Unit Development process. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. FYI: The City Commission indicated interest in having the covenants identify a better park boundary delineation through the use of vegetation as a buffer and barrier for the lots that back up to the park The applicant should work with the Parks Department to determine the most suitable vegetation for this purpose. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the conditions, code provisions, or the final site plan approval process. Respectfully, Jami Morris Associate Planner JM/jm Enclosure cc: HKM Engineering Inc., 601 Nikles Drive, Suite 2,Bozeman,MT 59715 Page 12 HUNTERS WAY (FUTURE DEVELOPMENT) II (.40 1 fj) l tp EP'II\ I I�iII!.I III{II I E f4IiII II]i(•.II C 1I T .,./.,. L�a^NoY to �w rn cn / bo Ln it 141 ,!N\�• OD^j/tO`NtOND° ---- �avf // ��--' �R'�b - - ---- m — — ucp� it orn --------aa-- — -- ----- --------- — C���oa^$'�!IIIIflI I IiIII °,.bO®C-���I I III 1 I�I'I I IE�II�d:IjIjIji�Y jI:1 I I�.';�!I�II�nI"`Ih�P�{1 I r,I\\.1\,li!IlIIitI�'II�iI•Il�iI.I���I i I\\..\ �\gS4z/N_vSS$� '.n;\.�.,''.-`\'.`.:'x�`90;'°`^r-0r�-^-�-..�.,u,�e-.z,e"ean...eea.oae,�oo�n�'•--..-+�^lII�`y€6a`'��I\'�:\�nO—°pc\.\0I::��J'\•I I``L�r a8Mp�0•II•°° a'l3_(�,"'Reoa.s_./,„i:)�r mN�Irf'�e.m �\'IiIilII\•\'.F�\e\....!�(•\�./'^�a\a�•�`�■.\.-,�e`�§"a0/�.N�`q.��'.,��gi�\Jp d°/0:..,.'.�s.-.'.�.i.'`.r.,ha�-.\J.>:.r°�—\°n e m tifi.0 h:g-.._'•;a-,y...'\.�...�..-.�--.i cnM.-�.�$,/e�a_'a�-r'o{}o-?/;�-�-././• L�'I-�m,�wm/;e�R.al-��ao r._.�/•s.a`re-.n';.�'M f �ie eere�e.��w�.m.,o���o—-�IIji.?iI-IiIrI.-�J_ ,. ;N'I.•ri�I'III�r ti-�a\a-ni��a�-xa-a.a m.�m:O.-.�'_l\�3I' .o 60.00' N01.47'3 "Ei o9 356.80 I1 � BUCKRAKE AVENUE BUCKRAKE AVENUEI LO 77 till --^ ------1 600' 5g mBUCA�AK AVENUE - -- - ----- - r OD CD Fo ' 6o.uo' CHINOOK COUR? �HINOOK COURT (}I r 7II .�.Z A�8 � '_^ o2O LOT SIP2 9ft. V ------ -- - -y-- 1CCCv' 1 III iiI�.:'. IIlIIIiI IiII cWn IiIIiI {1I\ s�om4 88' �. �Sw,ze.ao ;•:ll11 66B yO�" sEps l Il^ag�Oa �Rr$°S L^Q�x.grc"I.s'- pi s�a_a N-o r�"�-�^_o-.5-i a8-AW�g0i.-g$;��g^�ma0�g-�-em�$�a .0oa P t�,, g xp p\O'\�•p•^er O III \ � ' Il u-.e, „--f' --d x CIO 0 o � NOK c' 0W O ii 4 rs � �a g � 1 '5y I N Lo w it OC r - - --- + 9 terg„ s 6 8I - m0 V/ \ \•\ \I�V_ N0,-mr Ar m6Sj0 c � 8 � � �\ N°8� 8rySa�t 0�g80.60 8 0 '�-pe m0.ZC<m�AImnI D0D 2rnmN�1 > Z mw \ co S Tr GARDEN COURT C OURT CD z rn -- - ---- --- -- ------- W 00 . D (no F lv n----- ---- •o2'`R f�iog y���I II'6601 1 d L_ I 11 a \� , fv5yy4/q L<U�—�' -------4`36�-3 -.—_- --- II U D��✓?p�._�.9-.-._. .-PSlP- _. ; CmTaVl rn1 „ 2 — o m - 7-11 PW� 7th AVENUE (COLLECTOR)z - -- —'po 0. NORTH 27th AVkNE (CLLECT—) W ZONED R-J HP P �ZN£D R-3, 411, I 90 W U l COS 3 i a -tSCH14CHE LANE p 3 e L PPP 0. 3 � � �OP3� LLW ` ♦♦♦♦ '� LLP O ♦ ` �� ,♦ ♦♦ iJ L,2 3 3 y (��a 2 AUTUMN PROVO STREET LLPT"' P,z♦,, q,3 �♦♦ �S��� �ARu,p `♦ LLW Ow, �✓ $GJ,3 0 ♦♦ ASP,3 • ♦♦♦♦ DRAWN BY: GRB 2 9 COS,3, ♦♦ i �LWI ; `ems"2�y `e CHECKED BY: GAM RIR _„_ _ MCHACHE L14NE JOB ND: 0�2 LLP i1 v -------•,----- -- ------------- -- — - ---'--- PLOT SCALE: 1--W G22 �+. pLG At 3, iJ W _%J,2 ♦ 1 WINTER PARK STREET • (Y � W aRH 3 LLP A a O a ; ® 1 PGA 1- LLW fv �A ,3 'LON 1 =1, 3 ---� OR %L,2 COIN1, •� > 3 U U O Y ` E In zA BREEZE LA 3 ,�FLG //qq�� /i^� ♦eSGJ PGAS�" \ Z •4 1 \\ ey Cos# caA 3 1 jCCN"2 Z a BREEZE LAWNS t�`c9�'�4 U I 1% L,2 6 ARM,3� 1 . 8yn q"J common Name BOWnicel Dlme Blza Plmning else C0513 1 heae. hem: Tram: Trees: Tr_:Tram• hem: nJ e 3 B 1 3 AME 35 Amalcan Elm IIMoe amalwne 50'-60' 15°ral N AM41 A-1l I-Mal- T1111.am 1,_ 40'-50' 18"ul '�fL. r11� AW bl Aapm pop.h.W.Va. 30'-40' I°-15°cal ------ 1 V COB 36 Colorado epluce PI_punpex 50'-60' 6.10' Q LC V FLC 6 .3 000ing Qeb Mena e_ 20'-30' 125"cal Z_ 2 e LLP 10 Lanralmr Poplar Pcpuk x trumlrala 50'-60' LV mI 3 F LLW IS Laurel Lmr 011— Ball.P-w-dra 40'-50' 15"cal e LC r MR52 Ea O e ak Gk maccearpa 40'-&0' 1511.1 � , bP4a AZ 4 M PW l6 N...C—Ash R--[—pa,eyWentca'petm—Goal' 40'-50' 15"or l"eel 3 1 �, eLLL ,3 POP 33 Palda a Plne plow po draee d) 9huba: Strube: Shube: SFruba: strobe: Strube: (1/ ARM 54 A—lde R� LmTi tamricamo'Alde Red' 1k B' IB-21°III gje•L LLW; w A Moreynudde 1 \ LC, /� CCN 36 peycocarpn apJllPoliva e'z 10' I0-11° , 1 Cmon Nlneberk �m"a��. heilely iRm 33 co—ballyl e'x 9' 1-3' 1 1.ARt1, COBBLESTONE Ct. o o Red Twggeg Dogmaod 0.•A, 3 8G1 36 Jmipaua di—m.-us Crew 51x e' 5 gel ! 1 • Qa O Sea creel JWpm %ASP,9 ,0 COS, he All Set tram plmaad Two.the raa mill be ohl..W cal. 1 ,4 3 I 1 All LaMaup i arms dmlgrwted seeded and Irrigated will reaeve irrigation by metro or MA eubmetic urxiargraung maw— MA �j QPO F C 3 ARM,:i• i FLGOB POP O � o 9 e C13 ARM S ..-------�, li, e� BUR 3 PGA_2 L,2 PGA 2. A 2 R 3 R 3 A 2 ,yh1 FGA 2 3 R 3 A AML A, BUR,3 BUR 3 P A AML PGA AML BUR 3 OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL. A1RtER114L) 1 _ -------------------------------- ----------- ---------- -- - -- -------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------- --------- ------------- ---------- ----------------- --------- --II ,------—-----------_----- ----- ------------------ i J J JI , 4-12-04 Landempa Plan Provided ey: Caddie Deelgn '— Dramn%.. Eric MJameted rc 406-5BI-3360 P14RtI14L L14NDSCr4PE PL14N Li 2-28-03 a ErIC FFJamelad L.� I"=Imm" ___ U a; L— I �9 w BAXTER LANE (MINOR ARTERIAL) L,3 1 R A R A,.1 AML,3 .3 PGA &1R 2 A _ _ _ 137 A.2 R 1 A,1 E, I.cl P'p MR- S:J •4 ARH 3 ""PLC 'SPEC • R!F '• `a"1 O O AR11,2a 9 LP r • FiC��`waLC, Ar 5 (� FLC ee , �OP,3� %LC,4 - CYT C'2 �"OP'�3 LLW°I� • i �t3 3FLC —C ppP,3 COS,2 Se?FLC tARN,3 5 4ARIa,3 5 e ,�p5,3 LC CON 3 • Pr ' ARN e V �._ � 1 O orr—FLC ®oe_LP — ,1 ♦. • ASH,3 Sp • TRADE WIND LANE •o ,2R I 3 DRAWN BY: GRB R FL CHECKED BY: GAM 1 1 F'GA,3 0 (D .JOB NO:. 03052 1 ® ® TAM 9 PLOT SCALE 1=10d ....., RTD,4 s TRADE WIND LANE B11,2 I B ASP, 1 N.A CON QQ a a 6 pop ® E 9 I LfJ� ,2 ° 1 e 1 ASPEN GROVE STREET ; LLW PGA,4�) LLW 1 I I .2 1 0•tOpN, SP'6 ® I 9 3 STD, �0 EC�:1 O O LLP U � z 3 1° 1 x[ g COS 3 TSCHACHE LANE F3 w 1 - ------- -- --------------------------------------- -- -------------------------- --- -------------- 1 3 1 • 1 3`• LW ♦♦♦ 2 ♦ 1 ♦♦ i LLP ♦♦♦♦ 2 1 t��yr Y.US,3 \ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ P. L,2. i STD,3 O 3 PLC,4�c� ♦♦♦♦ po(�`♦ ♦♦ ems/ 1 AUTUMN GROVE StREEt LLP ♦P,� �J'3 °��� T ._ LLW� j�. �R1D ♦♦b ��ARIi,� ♦♦ ♦ r_. .. F -O re SGJ,3 • ♦♦♦ ASP,3 • ♦♦♦ CAS,3 ♦♦ BI7 2 O &LW° 6 -ARH,1 LLP ,♦♦♦♦♦ I u --- TSCHACHE LANE -- ------------- -- o d 3 � a 3 r� AS 6 O 0 FLC, N Q,6r r 1 .� rrrrrr II dSGJ 2 3 LLW� j O WINTER PARK STREET LLP i l ARC 3 ^/ 3 - I I IIIT 1 Landeca Plen R�Ided I � ' cpaadiaDaai9n �` IL= � � i� 4-12-04 Drawn By: Enc l4j r l d " J�1 PARTIAL LANDSCAPE PLAN l �z - L2 Eric Hsm Ja�ad 1 I%\04\S067110-TSK-3024\PUD_APP_PRELIM\FlgM-1_Vest-Vvds-Park-Plan.dw 02/29/2004 02106123 PM MST ti cp 0 Cr Z h1 , j\ CJI W o co a a Q m i M /I �/i -U � MD Z (M/NOR AR_TER L) cJ, Z cno \�/i\�/i\\/i DD � � CmrOC� Z � - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - - -T - - - t FOWLER — .o c O r r - Z - - cA3 �I � � /\//\//\/I � Omv XD 67Z - - O CD /\/\/\ I Z -O �l m O 2 v --- -r---i r r--r-- ' - v, o �\\//\\//\\ I O m m too ao u) I t I I I I 1�-1 TI I I �- - — W N p� Z /\/\/ I vN aiZ = pr Z I I I 1 1 1 ( ' r �- - -r r- m O• y\\/\\/\ I m - -i z z o ( I 1 1 1 I I 1 , I 1 I 1 I 1 1 V1 � D - v :i) • mx � Q Z / = D r' Z O O v _�--'----L-'--�—I--I_-1,--I_-r—+ I °O a = D o x m � cn ciz = � DOX t �- - - _ �- _L _J J_ 1 jZ Z _ -p O O to ' _-.-_� __ -- _ - -_ cp ` Z (� j/�\\/�\\/\ m O �� Z � ZD yZ � + f T � IT1 0 //\\//\\// ,94 Z v -n D O rr- z ■ `♦ /\\// I m O C7 -1 Z7 W ■ n ,. rn Z I --) I ----�--- I I---� . ■ Cl) / \\/\\ 2 D v D '� - --�I I ---r-----1 I I 1 I , 1 I I I --- ----I I-- L�J\ Li -� O Dt O j/jam/� 1 U) D �I D r- I I 1 11 _J-___—) ' rn \/\/\ rn z r o -I D , 1 - -------I -- I -- I I I I I I CD W Z In t/1 A'fl \\ \\ \\ � v D W I ' ' � 8 A r---�--- ---t I W v Q v \\�\\/\\j� p rZ = p v � > � O > . ^� /j/j/\/\ Z o W D I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 t -ioao \ \ \ \ v II I � Omo /i\/i\//\//\ ,,, = O � 1 , v j�\/\\jam\jam\ � Zm Dn 1 D rn m O \\\\\\\\\ r r c� rn D '�L - - - - - I- - - y o c > 0 v o r m ///\///\//// o ;< 1 _— �IVINBWi�RB - r I 60 '"O ZMMOM %\\/%\\/%\\/%\ I t I 1 Q Q I i ' I 1 I ' 1 ' ► , 1 1 1 \\ \ \ H -- 1 '�-z co _. IM N En it �,_ �. ♦ , r 1 - � L .. r f• O ftft. 30=a i v ----- ' ` ' I : '`` ►1 /, ~T-' t`f T—T`T T� a gp rr. — __ I ' U 13 ['■ 8CCCER PRACTICE ` ` \ � 9 ;,:, rrr FIELD I I 1 • `` '� ` \ -- ' 1 1 ' ' I I I 1 r 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I{Yi I i j .�� � � � � `, �- � ' � , , , , r / ,q 1 t I I I ,� •mot:' I , I I I C:• ,• wbb - o ---------- ANE -L� � Lill I ---- Ili \ _ - - - � ,� 1 I i,) C Z C N M l ---- 1 �� I I � ,.. I - 1 _ p ^:,+I r 1 4 I 1 ; �-(J�-�'!' 171 :-" •r: I - --� Q O 1 i I I ' ; j I I i I I I I I C I I I �ai-�-L�__I__�_ J=LL _LLLJ�' ' I' ' ► 1 �'' 1 it Lj-.LJ O • O -�'I I 1 � i w 1 1 I , 1 1 i , L• �. '- vl rn _- - -1E- - - - _ - - _--=L- - - W_ N. 27M) A VENUE (COLLECit T Try_ - - _ f I I Phase 1 A Phase 1 B • Total I Single Household 25 21 ' 4,6 Townhouse 28 12 40 Multi-household _ 1. . 1 2 Total 54 34 88 a r i Park Master Plan For i West Winds Planned Community i . i i s Prepared By. HKM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 E N G I N E E R I N G Revised April 22, 2005 • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 � • Park Master Plan For West Winds Planned Community ' & Phase I Subdivision Prepared For: Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 Prepared By: B KM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 ' Revised April 22, 2005 04S067.110 I Table of Contents ' Page ' Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 ParkElements ................................................................................................................................. 1 ' Active Areas.................................................................................................................................... 1 Passive & Sensitive Areas .............................................................................................................. 3 Irrigation ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Ownership &Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 7 Figures ' Figure 1 - Park Use Areas...............................................................................................................2 Figure2 - West Winds Park............................................................................................................4 Figure3 -Proposed Bollard Light.................................................................................................. 5 Appendices Appendix A- Specifications &Playground Equipment and Amenities ' Appendix B -Phase 1/Park Master Plan t ' Page i E N G INE ER IN� 1 � • West Winds—Park Master Plan March 2005 Introduction ' The West Winds Park is a component of the West Winds Planned Community located within the Northwest %4 of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, PMM, Bozeman, MT. The park is 1 proposed to be a neighborhood park providing both passive and active recreational activities. The intent of this plan is to provide a detailed design of the Phase I & B Park Master Plan and establish Design Guidelines for the remaining Phases. ' The Park design has emphasized preservation of an intermittent watercourse that bisects the property from south to north. The watercourse has fostered the growth of wetland species ' creating a jurisdictional wetland corridor through the property. This wetland corridor has intrinsic aesthetic and passive recreational value. The watercourse runs down the center of West Winds Park and is buffered by a 50 ft. watercourse set back. An extensive trail system will ' parallel the wetland system allowing residents to view the flora and fauna associated with the wetlands. The trail system will connect the West Winds Park and the remainder of the West Winds Community to adjacent neighborhoods, commercial areas (Baxter Meadows), and ' regional parks (Rose Park and the 100-acre Regional Park). West Winds Park is intended to servelbenefit a wide range of people (young families through seniors) within the West Winds and surrounding neighborhoods by offering both active and passive recreational areas. This will be achieved by the preservation of a wetland corridor, trail installation and tot playground area. Additionally, a portion of the active recreational area will ' be graded and seeded such that the area can also serve as youth soccer fields. Park Elements i1 Mary Keck of Garden Creations designed the landscaping in West Winds Park and the surrounding boulevard areas, in compliance with all applicable design standards. The top 10-inches of existing soil, over the entire West Winds Park area, must be amended, as specified by the City Parks Foreman and described in the Appendices. 1 Active Areas The West Winds Park will include active areas designed to provide a wide assortment of ' recreational opportunities to the neighborhood residents. These areas will include the installation of a tot lot and general purpose playfields. 1 Passive Areas Passive Areas, as shown in Figure 1, are areas where residents can relax and enjoy West Winds ' Park's natural offerings. Benches and other amenities will be placed at locations throughout the Park. ' Sensitive Areas The West Winds Park will also included sensitive areas in the form of jurisdictional wetlands and the associated watercourse setbacks. These areas will be maintained in their natural state ' with additional landscaping as outlined in the Watercourse Setback Planting Plan. ' Page 1 of 8 ENGINEERING WILUM R. P-ErERSON Lor 'I , ,'• I S�������•� I I I I I l i ji. MEOW I I ■ ,1'ii•.''� Ili I 1. ��I I !1 I "•♦l.li :l 1 i j %i i•:•: � I _ I �'i I I/OoiO I / ♦ ��. �„•�+4,++!r 1 na ga II• 1♦ •1 1 • I \ \ I "P : oo��. lklL •o Qa�01 r•i0•o:0•i�: I ` WEST WINDS COMMUNITY GALLATIN ,1 �;.0! .•✓✓•"Joss i?so•..•0/, _ ____ AO' .•Ia000••00.00/ i 1 , r 1 , 1 • - ✓ n 1 COUNTY, • WEST WINDS PARK 601 Res Dr.,SuRe 2 USE AREAS FAX 1. 58&17W West Winds—Park Master Plan March 2005 Active Areas ' General Purpose Playfields Approximately 53% of the parkland will be dedicated to general-purpose playfields, or active use ' areas. These playfields would support a wide array of activities. These areas would also be graded and seeded such that the areas can be used as youth soccer practice fields. The playfield areas would be irrigated via a well system and will be mowed. Lawn areas within West Winds Park shall consist primarily of regularly maintained, manicured lawns, meeting the City of Bozeman Parks Division specifications and requirements. ' A complete specification for the installation and maintenance of the turf at West Winds Park is located at the end of this document, in Appendix A. ' Trails Trail installation will be in conformance with the City of Bozeman's 2020 Master Plan and will ' meet Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) specifications for recreational facilities. The trail system will achieve the desired north/south and east/west connectivity by linking Rose Park, located to the east of the West Winds Community to the 100-acre Regional Park to the West. It ' will also connect Harvest Creek Subdivision, located to the south, with the Baxter Creek Subdivision to the north via a trail system constructed adjacent to the wetlands streambed and through the park. The North/South trail system will be classified as a Class I trail system, and ' will be installed within Zone 2 of the Watercourse Setback,which is described below in greater detail. The East/West trail system will be classified as a Class II trail system, and will be installed in a 60-ft. wide trail corridor, as shown in Figure 2. Trail bollard lights will also be ' installed per UDO Section 18.42.150.C.6 at all intersections of trails and streets, located within the West Winds Subdivision and along existing streets abutting the development. Currently, the City of Bozeman Parks and Recreation Department is looking into several options for the trail ' bollard lights. It is proposed that the City's standard trail marker be modified such that low energy consumptive LED lights could be attached to illuminate the trailhead. A schematic drawing of the proposed bollard light is shown in Figure 3. An 8-foot wide bike path(shared-use path) will be constructed to provide an extension of the existing Harvest Creek trail to the south. The bike path will be constructed with an approved ' natural fines design mix to be consistent with the natural surroundings. This path will provide a vital connection to the City of Bozeman 2020 Master Plan trail system. Tot Lots A youth"tot lot"playground will be installed as part of the West Winds Park active area, as ' shown on Figure 2. Play equipment such as slides, swings, etc. will be located here to provide recreational opportunities for the preschool to early grade school age children in the neighborhood. The playground equipment, catalogue sheets of which can be found in Appendix ' A of this report,will be placed within wood-chipped areas contained by landscape timbers, as shown in the Park Master Plan. ' Page 3 of 8 E.N�ER IE RI N� ' I DIANHE PETERSON I RR PRR I Q fOWARO 61 S I WiLIAN R. PETERSOH L 0• LOT B SEC 35 4 0 I yf4 4 4 11�— — :3ff39 ACS— — UNPLATTED — — RpkSER III I +L 1+ SUAI/T ~0 — 35 BAXTER LANE IN/NOR ARTERIAL) 1 1 ---3 2 - ------------�----------- -- --------- --- -- - ---_-- -- -- I 1 PRACACL FM LA �--'---------- I I - 000� I I �rT"T'l�"T"ice � - _ FUTURE BARTER c'ADOKS UBOIY/SIONI ; -~-_ - ' I ii "�, I I I - I_ ' I -180HA6FE+kE --i-------- I I i �---� 1 I I` I 1 I I 1 � 11) 11 , ---J I '• t:AA� -_ o I —�----�YIIiB►rAAEeRI�T--�---�- �\ � I TRAIL i I Il IC I ' y I III (TYPI III I i WATER COURSE `�\ \\\ L---i ' III I I ICAIE HOUADARY SI I I�1 I � \I I I �—'----- --------- - ii II 1• I -- I 111�P` -___--___--- ` ----_------------------OAK 8 _ _ I _ I------------_----- -----_--_-_-_----- - 1 I I UNPLATTED I HARVEST CREEK WILLMH H. d I ' HSUBDISVSIGNCREEK II III I SUBDIVISION �Ot PL5 (0 I BETT)'ANNE I P n I +48 HASE 10 A 11 I SIPPLE TRUST I I I — — — I I I III "� 18NT8R OF S. 2 I � II ) III I I I LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUN/T Y �'" "ONAL RE'O NW 114 SECTION Z,O�ea,>En,�R�AnoH AR>:A T.2.5., R.6.E., P.N.M. o BMW VIATM DETIMM FAMW GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA -N- ' HKM Enylneerft Inc. —® Pt�M TRAIL CROSSNO MCChesney Professional Bldg. # WEST WINDS PARK 601 Nudes Dr.,Suffe 2 g Bozeman,,MMTT59715 — ---°d wA1°I°0 o FIGURE 2 FAX(406)51,11730 ano o aoo iiiiiiiia {� CAM APR 24 ON PRQECr N°.oua�.110 Cwy*t 0 4°°ti HO So~q kw.N Rgfb Rsswo& r g_1/q^ 1 9_1/q^Xg_1/q^ TREATED POST i!� llt%i GARDCO 952 LED EXTERNAL WALL LIGHT EACH SIDE !' PARALLEL TO TRAIL (I 11 I ALIGNMENT 60" INTERNAL JUNCTION BOX 16" TYP. ; 30" i N%ffll 7_CONDUIT TO POWER SOURCE 18"0 CONCRETE BASE s s a a ro TRAIL BOLLARD DETAIL N SCALE : NONE a `M Q Y N 7 1 s e a WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ENGINEERING HKM Engineering Inc. McChesney Professional Bldg. TRAIL BOLLARD DETAIL 601 NiMes Dr.,Suite 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)586-8834 FIGURE 3 1 s FAX(406)586-1730 DATe MAR 17.2005 PROJECT NO.015087.110 Copyright 0 2005 HKM Engineering Ina.AD Rights Resoved. 1 • • West Winds—Park Master Plan March 2005 . 1 Once installed, the playground equipment will be audited by a Certified Playground Safety Inspector, and meet ASTM F1387-01, CPSC and ADA guidelines and specifications. The HOA ' must coordinate a regular inspection schedule with the City Parks Department. ' Amenities Due to the wide population age range of the West Winds Subdivision, additional amenities, such as benches and other appurtenances, will be located throughout the Park to allow for the viewing ' and enjoyment of the native flora and fauna. Catalogue sheets of the proposed amenities are provided within Appendix A of this report. ' Passive & Sensitive Areas Wetlands - ' The jurisdictional wetland areas will be maintained in their natural state, with limited improvements as specified within the Watercourse Setback Planting Plan, which has been provided with this Final P.U.D. submittal. Bridges will be constructed to allow continuity of the ' trail system that runs east-west across the West Winds Subdivision. Watercourse ' The watercourse areas of West Winds Park will remain in their natural state with the exception of minor streambed improvements and additional tree and shrub planting, as detailed in the Watercourse Setback Planting Plan. ' Watercourse Setback The passive and sensitive areas within West Winds Park will be set up with the intent of preserving the existing wetland areas, along with the associated flora and fauna. The watercourse setback has been broken down into two zones. Zone 1 reaches 30 feet from the edge of the wetlands, or flowline of the watercourse. Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet outward. ' The lineal trail system portion that bisects the subdivision from south to north will lie within the Zone 2 setback. ' The landscaping will provide for the planting of native, drought tolerant tree and shrub species. Additionally, the passive areas delineated outside of the watercourse setback will be landscaped such that the character of the wetlands are will be maintained. The passive areas will be seeded ' with a drought-tolerant seed mixture that will not require additional irrigation or mowing. Landscaping within the watercourse setback will satisfy the UDO point system and is described in greater detail in the Watercourse Setback Planting Plan. Irrigation ' As designed, the active areas within West Winds Park are intended to be fully irrigated. The source of this irrigation water will be a series of dedicated wells, located in the park site at areas ' approved by the City of Bozeman Parks Division. All indicated areas shall be watered with permanent, underground irrigation systems, operated by ' means of an automatic time controller. This controller, along with all pump relays,breakers and ' Page 6 of 8 ENGINEERING • • West Winds—Park Master Plan March 2005 1 meters, shall be located in a single, vandal-resistant, lockable steel pedestal enclosure, having separate compartments appropriate to this equipment. All irrigation equipment shall be supplied, ' installed, and operated in full compliance with City of Bozeman Parks Division's requirements and specifications. , rA complete specification for the installation of the irrigation system at West Winds Park is located at the end of this document, in Appendix A. ' The subdivider shall be responsible for irrigating the park area until development of the subdivision reaches 50%, after which time the Homeowner's Association shall maintain and ' irrigate the publicly dedicated portions of the park. Wells will be used to irrigate the park area. A well system will be developed in which none of the proposed wells- which would not be manifolded together—would pump at a rate greater than 35 gallons per minute. By staying ' below the aforementioned pumping rate, it is not necessary to acquire water rights. Ownership & Maintenance tInitial Construction&Maintenance The subdivider of any specific phase of the West Winds Planned Community shall be responsible for improving his or her specific park area. The improvements shall include leveling any park areas, amending the soil, seeding disturbed areas to allow mowing with turf type mowers, installing trail systems, installing any ancillary items (benches,play equipment, etc.) ' and installing an underground irrigation system in compliance with the City of Bozeman's standards and specifications. The park shall be seeded with a drought tolerant grass seed. Prior to beginning any construction activities in the Park areas, a pre-construction meeting will be held with all concerned parties in attendance. The purpose of this meeting will be to review and approve all proposed construction materials and methods. The Developer will initially be responsible for ownership and maintenance of West Winds Park until such time when the subdivision has reached 50% of development. At this time, the West ' Winds Homeowner's Association(HOA) will be responsible for ownership and maintenance of the West Winds Park. The HOA shall retain ownership until a Park Maintenance District or similar funding source is established. West Winds Park will be dedicated to the City of ' Bozeman for ownership and maintenance in accordance of Section 18.50.070 of the BMC, which stated parks that provide recreation pathways should be dedicated to the City. The developer will initially be responsible for the maintenance of the proposed park lands until such a point that fifty percent of the subdivisions lots have been sold, as required by the City of ' Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinances. The landscaping will be maintained in a healthy, growing state during this period. Trash removal will be carried out on a weekly basis and be performed by park maintenance personnel. The West Winds HOA will be responsible for snow t removal from sidewalks that are adjacent to the park and open-space areas. The HOA, or their representative will be responsible for snow removal from these areas within 24 hours of snowfall. ' Page 7 of 8 ENGINEERING West Winds—Park Master Plan March 2005 The parkland will be turned over to the Homeowner's Association, who will then become ! responsible to carry out the maintenance duties until such a time when the parkland will be turned over to the City's Parks and Recreation Department. ' Weed Management A weed management plan will be set in place to discourage the establishment of noxious weeds in the West Winds Park areas. The noxious weeds,which are easily spread by traffic within park areas and trail corridors, could have negative effects on the park areas including increased soil erosion, diminished water quality, and unpleasant aesthetic impacts. Fundm The developer of any portion of the West Winds Planned Community would be initially responsible for developing their required share of the parkland areas. Upon build-out of the specific phase, the Homeowner's Association would be responsible for park irrigation and maintenance. t ' Page 8 of 8 EN�ERIN� � CITY OF BOZEMAN - PARKS DESIGN GUIDELINES � PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ' AND AMENITIES October 31, 2003 ' Design Guidelines for City of Bozeman, Parks: * New Phrk construction must be approved by the Parks Division and the Recreation and Parks ' Advisory Board, and must comply with the master plan, if applicable. Any changes must be approved and/or amended in the master plan. ' * Soils must meet specifications set by the City of Bozeman, Parks Division. Soil tests should be performed prior to planting to determine soil type and nutrient deficiencies. Once soils meet specifications, ground will be tilled at a depth of ten (10) to twelve (12) inches, and all rock in ' excess of 1 inch in diameter shall be removed. If soils do not meet specifications, soil must be amended. Amendments may vary depending on existing soils, but will generally consist of 60% ' course sand (generally concrete sand),20% organics (C:N ratio below 30) and 20% approved native soil. Soils will be mixed, prior to installation, with a screener/mixer machine, or applied in layers on site and mixed thoroughly with a deep rototiller. Depth of amended soil will be a ' minimum of ten(10) inches. There will be no compaction following the grading process. Fertilizer, and the rate at which it will be applied, should be dictated by the soil test report. Seeding ratios and mixes will be approved by the City of Bozeman Parks Division. Seeding will be applied with a slit-type or drill-type seeder to insure good soil to seed contact. Before seeding, the soil shall be loosened to a minimum depth of six inches in order to improve initial root ' development. The soil will not be compacted in any manner. Sufficient compaction is readily achieved through the grading process and normal rainfall. Fertilizer should be applied prior to planting to insure healthy plant development. Generally, a seed mix combination of Bluegrasses ' and Rye are used in formally maintained Parks. Some low maintenance Kentucky bluegrasses that perform well are: Kenblue, Park, Plush, Vantage, Victa, Vanessa,Barblue, Parade and S-21. Perennial ryegrass will be used opposed to annual ryegrass. Athletic fields will be planted with ' new-improved Kentucky bluegrass types and new cultivars of perennial rye. Examples of some of the new, aggressive types of KBG's are as follows: Award, Total Eclipse, Midnight,Nustar, Ram I, Limousine and Touchdown. Lower maintenance parkland may require different seed ' mixes, and will be specified by the Parks Division. ' * Irrigation systems will be compatible with Maxicom systems. All water lines shall be schedule 40 PVC. Black Poly pipe is unacceptable. Pipe shall be installed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches, main lines at eighteen inch minimum depth. If this depth is unachievable, the ' Parks Division must be consulted. Four(4) inches of sand shall be placed beneath pipe, and four (4) inches of sand above the pipe, to prevent compaction and settling. Sprinkler heads will be installed on manufactured swing joints (schedule 80 w/o-rings). Heads to be installed must be ' approved by the Parks Division and shall be gear driven,with interchangeable nozzle sizes, unless noted otherwise, and shall be capable of producing the specified gpm and coverage area and shall be set to manufacturers' specifications. Electrical locate tape shall be installed along all ' lines. Upon completion of installation, all warranty and maintenance information, as well as well logs and pump warranties and information, if applicable, and an"as-built"map shall be supplied to the City of Bozeman Parks Division. i ' * Playgrounds must be installed on property managed by the City of Bozeman. All playgrounds ' must be approved by a Certified Playground Safety Inspector(CPSI) and meet ASTM F1487-01, CPSC and ADA guidelines and specifications. Playgrounds shall be age appropriate, for area served, and be signed accordingly. There must be an adequate use zone area around equipment, ' approved material in use zone, which meets impact attenuation criteria as specified in ASTM 1292, and adequate drainage. All installation plans, materials list, construction guidelines, maintenance information and manufacturer's name must be supplied to the City of Bozeman's ' Parks Division, upon completion of playground installation. All work will be overseen and approved by a CPSI. No wooden structures will be approved. ' * Fencing shall be constructed with 9 gauge, commercial grade, chain link fabric. All posts and top rails shall be schedule 80 galvanized pipe. Corner post will be 2 and 3/8 ", line post will be 1 ' 7/8", top and bottom rails will be 1 1/4". All post are to be set in concrete, spaced at 10 foot intervals, and a concrete pad, 12" in width and 4" in depth shall be installed beneath the fence line, along the entire length. A bottom rail will be installed between all sections of fence for the ' purpose of tying the fabric down as well as maintaining the strength and integrity of the fabric. ' * Trails shall be a minimum of 72 inches in width for Class 1 and for Class 2 trails. Trail bed must be excavated 4 to 6 inches deep, prior to installation of tread mix. Tread mix shall be 3/8th inch minus gravel (natural fines) with a minimum content of 20%clay binder. If tread mix does ' not contain enough clay binder, additional clay must be mixed in. Alternative soil stabilizer products are acceptable, but must be approved by the City of Bozeman Parks Division. Trail bed must be filled up to original surface along both edges with a gentle crown reaching a height of 4 ' inches, above edges, at the center of the trail. Tread mix must be rolled and compacted after installation, maintaining 4 inch crown (If moisture content is not adequate for compaction, water should be added prior to rolling and compacting). Where terrain allows, slope of trail should not ' exceed 12:1 with a cross slope no greater than 20:1 (5%) to provide for ADA accessibility. All damage to surrounding features and/or vegetation shall be reclaimed immediately. Encroaching ' weeds, due to trail construction, shall be treated and controlled for a minimum of 2 years after trail section is completed. Minimum overhead clearance shall be 96" for pedestrian and bike traffic, and 120" for equestrian traffic. * Bridges shall have a minimum width of 36 inches, when 20 feet or less in length. Bridges exceeding 20 feet in length shall have a minimum width of 72 inches, to allow wheelchair turn ' around and passing. Height of bridge is measured from bridge deck to bottom of stream or river. If deck is more than 30 inches high, a protective rail is required. Rails are to be 42 inches high, with at least one midrail at 34 inches, to be used as a handrail. All bridges to be installed on ' public lands must be certified by a civil or structural engineer. If bridge does not require a rail, it must have a 4 inch high curb on, both sides, along entire length of bridge. Deck should be ' constructed of slip-resistant material. Deck of bridge shall not exceed a 12 to 1 slope along any part of it's length. Deck, and ends of bridge, must have no abrupt change in surface level greater than %2 inch. Cross slope shall not exceed 3% t * Hillside Grades shall be no steeper than 5:1,with 7:1 being preferred, to allow fir maintenance equipment access and to minimize water runoff. 1 1 1 SECTION 02905 -LANDSCAPING PART 1 - GENERAL ' 1.01 RELATED DOCUMENTS Drawings and general provisions of each Contract, including General Conditions, ' Supplementary Conditions, apply to work of this section. 1 1.02 DESCRIPTION A. See plans for extent of landscaping. B. Provide topsoil for all shrub and tree planting beds. 1.03 RELATED WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE A. Section 2200 - Earthwork B. Section 2215 -Earthwork for Surface Restoration ' C. Section 2760 -Irrigation System D. Section 2935 - Lawns and Grasses ' 1.04 QUALITY ASSURANCE ' A. Comply with applicable Federal, state and county regulations governing landscape materials and work. B. ENGINEER reserves right to review and reject materials at growing site and as delivered to site. ' C. Observation at growing site does not preclude right of rejection at job site. Remove rejected materials from site immediately. D. Personnel: Employ only qualified personnel familiar with required work. 1.05 REFERENCED STANDARDS A. American Standard for Nursery Stock, Edition approved 1985 by American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ZGO.1) -plant materials. B. Hortus Third, 1976 - Cornell University-plant nomenclature. ' C. ASTM: American Standard Testing Material- sharp sand. ' LANDSCAPING 02905 - 1 D. Tree Pruning, by Alex Shigo. 1.06 SUBMITTALS A. Submit three representative samples of each variety of ornamental trees, ' shrubs, and groundcover plants for ENGINEER'S approval. When approved, tag, install, and maintain as representative samples for final installed plant materials. ' B. File Certificates of Inspection of plant material by State, County and Federal authorities with ENGINEER, if required. ' C. Submit within 30 days after award of contract, complete list of materials to be furnished under this section and confirmed sources for materials. ' D. Provide and pay for material testing. Submit the following materials certification and text report. ' 1. Topsoil (on-site or imported): ' a. pH factor b. Mechanical analysis c. Percentage of organic content ' d. Recommendations on type and quantity of additives required to establish satisfactory pH factor and supply of nutrients to bring topsoil to satisfactory level for planting e. Identif source location of topsoil proposed for use on the Y P p P project if imported from off-site. ' 2. Peat Moss ' a. Loss of weight by ignition b. Moisture absorption capacity c. Percentage of organic matter id. pH factor ' 02905 - 2 LANDSCAPING ' E. Submit the following material samples: 1. Mulch 2. Erosion control fabric Filter fabric 4. Drainage matting 5. Edging ' 1.07 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING A. Preparation 1. Balled and Burlapped (B&B) Plants: Dig and prepare shipment in a manner that will not damage roots, branches, shape, and future development. 2. Container Grown Plants: Deliver plants in container sufficiently rigid to hold ball shape and protect root mass. ' B. Delivery 1. Deliver packaged materials in sealed containers showing weight, ' analysis, and name of manufacturer. Protect materials from deterioration during delivery and while stored at site. 2. Deliver only plant materials that can be planted in one day unless adequate storage and watering facilities are available on job site. ' 3. Protect root balls by heeling in with sawdust if not planted within 24 hours of delivery. 4. Protect during delivery to prevent damage to roots at all tirr_es. Cover all materials during transport. 5. Notify ENGINEER of delivery schedule 48 hours in advance so plant material may be observed upon arrival at job site. 6. Remove rejected plant material immediately from site. 7. Do not lift, move, adjust to plumb, or otherwise manipulate plants by trunk or stems. Avoid damage or stress by proper handling. ' LANDSCAPING 02905 - 3 • Plant material dropped on the ground, rather than gently placed into the storage area or planting bed, will be rejected. 1.08 JOB CONDITIONS A. Site Work Restrictions ' 1. Care must be exercised to minimize disturbance or compaction of areas adjacent to any project. In the vicinity of deciduous trees,this ' includes an area of a radius from the trunk equal to twice the height of the tree. In the vicinity of coniferous trees, this includes an area of a radius from the trunk equal to one-half(2) the height of the tree. Such preservation areas must be fenced off using four- foot wood slat snow fence supported by five foot steel tee posts at ten(10) foot intervals. ' 2. In order to prevent excessive soil compaction and destruction of soil structure, no site work will be performed in cases where equipment or traffic must pass over wet soils or if wet soils must be handled or manipulated in order for the work to progress. Wet soil is defined as any soil within 90% of field capacity(saturation). 3. Do not move equipment over existing landscape or newly placed structures without approval of ENGINEER and General ' CONTRACTOR. 4. Provide board roading as required to protect paving. Protect other improvements from damage, with protection boards, ramps, and protective sheeting. B. Planting Restrictions 1. Perform actual planting only when temperatures are between 32°and 85°F., in calm to moderate winds, and less than moderate precipitation. Soil moisture conditions must be less than 90% field capacity(saturation). 2. OWNER must approve all bedding plants and ground covers. 3. A buffer zone of turf grass, pavers or other solid, anchored material of at least five (5) feet in width must exist between sidewalk margins and any planting bed. Paved walks or service drives wider than eight feet must have buffer zones of ten feet, minimum. ' 02905-4 LANDSCAPING • 4. Plant materials must be installed with spacing that allows, at maturity, a maximum of 30% canopy overlap or interfingering. This does not apply to species of widely disparate mature sizes, such as between a large tree and understory shrubs, because their ' canopies do not grow together. 5. Trees that are medium and small at maturity must be planted no ' closer than fifteen feet to any building, sidewalk, or paved surface. Trees that are large at maturity cannot be placed closer than twenty ' feet to any building, sidewalk, or paved surface. OWNER must approve exceptions to these requirements. ' C. Utilities 1. See Division 1 for Utility Locates. ' 2. Coordinate work with MSU - Bozeman irrigation specialist to prevent damage to underground sprinkler system. 1.09 WARRANTY ' A. Warranty plants and trees for one year after final acceptance. Replace dead or dying materials not in vigorous, thriving condition as soon as weather permits and on notification by ENGINEER. Replace plants, including ' trees, which in opinion of ENGINEER have partially died thereby damaging shape, size, or symmetry. B. Replace plants and trees with same kind and size as originally planted, at no cost to OWNER. Provide one-year warranty on replacement plants. Trees should be replaced at start of next planting or digging season. In ' such cases, remove dead trees immediately. Protect irrigation system and other piping conduit or other work during replacement. Repair damage immediately. ' C. Warrant excludes replacement of plants after final acceptance because of Y P p p injury by storm, drought, drowning, hail, freeze, insects, or diseases. ' Materials damaged by "Acts of God" prior to final acceptance are responsibility of CONTRACTOR. ' D. At end of warranty period, remove staking and guying materials from the site. 1.10 MAINTENANCE ' A. Water will be available on site. Provide necessary hoses and other watering equipment required to complete work. LANDSCAPING 02905-5 t • • B. Maintain plantings and trees by watering, cultivating, weeding, spraying, ' cleaning and replacing as necessary to keep landscape in a vigorous, healthy condition and rake bed areas as required until final acceptance. C. Coordinate watering schedules with irrigation CONTRACTOR during installation and until final acceptance. Provide deep root watering to newly installed trees. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 PLANTS ' A. General Plant quality shall be equal to well-formed No. 1 grade nursery stock. Listed plant heights are from tops of root balls to nominal tops of plants. Plants shall be specimen quality, typical of their species or variety. ' B. Shrubs and Ground Covers Plants shall be nursery grown, healthy, vigorous, of normal habit of ' growth for species, free from disease, insect eggs, and larvae. Specified sizes are before pruning and measured with branches in normal position. Plants shall be well rooted and established in the container. ' C. Ornamental and Shade Trees ' Trees shall be healthy, vigorous, full-branched, well shaped, trunk diameter and height requirements as specified. Balls shall be firm, neat, slightly tapered and well burlapped. Trees with loose or broken balls at ' time of planting shall be rejected. ENGINEER will individually approve trees. Root balls shall be nine inches in diameter for each inch caliper, measured twelve inches above root ball. Trees shall be free of physical damage such as scrapes,bark abrasions, or split branches. D. Special Requirements ' Shade trees are to be procured a minimum of 30 days prior to scheduled p Y installations. Trees are to be healed in at job site or at CONTRACTOR's ' holding facility and maintained until site is ready. ENGINEER will review trees at holding area prior to planting. E. Collected Trees Spray field grown trees immediately prior to digging with anti-desiccant. ' Insure adequate coverage to trunks, branches, and foliage. ' 02905-6 LANDSCAPING 1 • 1 1 F. Acceptable Plant Palette 1. Large Deciduous Trees 1 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 1 A. saccarnum Silver Maple A. saccharum Sugar Maple Betula nigra River Birch 1 B.papyrifera Paper Birch B.pendula Weeping Birch Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 1 Elaeagnus angustifolia Russian Olive Fraxinus pennsylvanica, `Patmore' Patmore Ash Gleditsia tricanthos,var.inermis Thornless Common Honeylocust 1 Juglans cinerea Butternut J. nigra Black Walnut Populus acuminata Lanceleaf Cottonwood 1 P. tremula, `Erecta' Swedish Tower Aspen P. tremuloides Quaking Aspen Quercus macrocarpa Burr Oak 1 Tilia americana American Basswood T. americana, `Redmond` Redmond Linden T. cordata Littleleaf Linden 1 Ulnus americana, `Cathedral' Cathedral Elm 2. Medium Deciduous Trees 1 Acer innala Amur Maple g P Aesculus glabra Ohio Buckeye 1 Craetagus succulenta, `Toba' Toba Hawthorne Malus spp. Crabapple `Dolgo' Dolgo Crabapple 1 `Red Splendor' Red Splendor Crabapple `Spring Snow' Spring Snow Crabapple `Thunderchild' Thunderchild Crabapple Prunus maackii Amur Chokecherry P. virginiana Common Chokecherry P. virginiana, `Shuberts' Shubert's Chokecherry 1 Sorbus aucuparia European Mountain Ash S. decora Showy Mountain Ash 1 S. thuringiaca Oak-leaf Mountain Ash Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac 3. Large Coniferous Trees 1 LANDSCAPING 02905 -7 Abies concolor Concolor or White Fir A. lasiocarpa Subalpine Fir Larix decidua European Larch Picea glauca densata Black Hills Spruce ' P.pungens Colorado Spruce P.pungens, var. glauca Blue Spruce Pinus contorta latifolia Lodgepole Pine ' P.flexilis Limber Pine P. nigra var. nigra Austrian Pine ' P.ponderosa Ponderosa Pine P. sylvestris Scotch Pine Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 4. Medium Coniferous Trees ' Juniperus scopulorum (Rocky Mountain Juniper) `Blue Haven' Blue Haven Juniper `Cologreen' Cologreen Juniper ' `Welchii' Welchi Juniper `Wichita Blue' Wichita Blue Juniper Pinus aristata Bristlecone Pine 5. Large Deciduous Shrubs ' Acer ginnala Amur Maple A. tatarica Tatarian Maple Amelanchier alnifolia Saskatoon Serviceberry ' Amelanchier alnifolia, `Regent' Regent Serviceberry Cornus sericea Redtwig Dogwood C.flavimera Yellowtwig Dogwood Cotoneaster lucidus Hedge Cotoneaster C. acutifolius Peking Cotoneaster Euonymus alatus Winged Euonymus ' Lonicera tatarica, `Arnold's Red' Arnold's Red Honeysuckle Rhus typhina Staghorn Sumac R. typhina, `Laciniata' Laceleaf Sumac ' Physocarpus opulufolius Common Ninebark Prunus tomentosa Nanking Cherry P. triloba var. multiplex Rose Tree of China P. virginia Common Chokecherry P. virginia, `Shubert' Shubert's Chokecherry Spirea x vanhouttei Van Houtte's Spirea ' Syringa villosa Late Lilac S. vulgaris Common Lilac ' Viburnum dentatum Arrowwood Viburnum V. lantana Wayfaringtree Viburnum ' 02905 - 8 LANDSCAPING V. lantana, `Mohican' Mohican Wayfaringtree V. lentago Nannyberry V. opulus European Cranberrybush V. trilobum American Cranberrybush 6. Medium Deciduous Shrubs Aronia melanocarpa Black Chokeberry Caragana pygmaea Pygmy Caragana Cornus sericea Redtwig Dogwood C. sericea, Isanti Isanti Dogwood C. sericea, `Elegantissima' Variegated Dogwood Euonymus alatus Winged Euonymus E. alatus, `Compacta' Dwarf Euonymus Potentilla fruticosa, (Bush Cinquefoil) `Abbotswood' Abbotswood Potentilla `Coronation Triumph' Coronation Triumph Potentilla `Goldfinger' Goldfinger Potentilla `Katherine Dykes' Katherine Dyke Potentilla `Sunset' Sunset Potentilla `Tangerine' Tangerine Potentilla Lonicera claveyi, `Nana' Clavey's Dwarf Honeysuckle Prunus besseyi Western Sandcherry Rhus aromatica Skunkbrush Sumac ' Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant Rosa rugosa Rugosa Rose varieties Spirea x bumalda, `Anthony Waterer' Anthony Waterer Spirea Spirea x bumalda, `Gold Flame' Gold Flame Spirea Spirea japonica, `Little Princess' Little Princess Spirea Syringa meyerii Meyer Lilac LViburnum trilobum, `Compacta' Compact Cranberrybush 7. Large Coniferous Shrubs ' Juni erous chinensis Chinese Juniper) P � J P ) `Gold Coast' Gold Coast Juniper `Hetzii' Hetzii Juniper `Wintergreen' Wintergreen Juniper J. communis Common Juniper J. sabina Savin Juniper J. scopulorum, `Tabletop' Tabletop Juniper Pinus mugo Swiss Mountain Pine ' Thuja occidentalis, `Techny' Techny Arborvitae LANDSCAPING 02905- 9 ' 8. Medium and Small Coniferous Shrubs Juniperus chinensis `Mint Julep' Mint Julep Juniper J. horizontalis (Creeping Juniper) `Blue Chip' Blue Chip Juniper `Emerald Spreader' Emerald Spreader Juniper `Hughes' Hughes Juniper `Prince of Wales' Prince of Wales Juniper `Wiltomi' Wilton's Juniper J. sabina, (Savin Juniper) `Arcadia' Arcadia Juniper `Buffalo' Buffalo Juniper `Skandia' Skandia Juniper var. tamariscifolia Tam Juniper Picea abies nidiformis Bird's Nest Spruce Taxus cuspidata Japanese Yew 9. Turf Grass Species Festuca arundinaceaa Tall Fescue F. rubra rubra Creeping Red Fescue Lolium multiflorum Annual Ryegrass L.perenne Perennial Ryegrass 1 Poa pratensis Kentucky Bluegrass 2.02 SOIL PREPARATION MATERIALS A. Soil amendments Soil amendments are not to be used unless approved by OWNER. B. Topsoil t 1. Friable, fertile, dark, loamy soil, free of clay lumps, stones and other extraneous material and reasonably free of weeds and foreign grasses,with pH of 5.0 to 8.0. 2. Organic matter shall be 4-12%total dry weight. 3. Provide tests for certification. C. Sharp Sand Sharp sand shall be clean, washed, fine aggregate-ASTM C-33. 02905 - 10 LANDSCAPING E. Peat Moss Peat m a e moss shall b commercially produced, sterilized, reed-sedge peat, equivalent to Martins Peat, Big Fork, MT. Peat must have a pH between five and seven and an organic matter content not less than 90 percent. E. Fertilizer 1. Type A- as recommended by testing agency. I' 2. Type B - Jirdon Nitrofonn Nitro at 12-9-14, 20 pounds per cubic yard. 2.03 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS A. Ed in Provide edging by Black Diamond, 6 inches, vinyl (or approved equal). B. Mulch 1. Shredded, medium grade, Douglas fir bark with a chip size of 1 Y? to 2%2" average, free of wood chips and sawdust, as manufactured by Model Log Homes, 75777 Gallatin Rd., Gallatin Gateway, MT 59730 (or approved equal). 2. l%Z" round, native, washed, river rock. 1 3. ENGINEER approved equivalent. C. Landscape Fabric Heavy grade, spun-bonded nylon landscape fabric with six inch anchoring pins. Woven fabric is unacceptable. D. Anti-Desiccant 1. Protective film emulsion providing a protective film over plant surfaces; permeable to permit transpiration, as manufactured by Wilt Pruf, Inc. P.O. Box 4280, Greenwich, CT 06830. Mixed and applied in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. ' 2. ENGINEER approved equivalent. 1 LANDSCAPING 02905 - 11 E. Staking and Gu ijng Materials 1. Tie Wire: 12 gauge, galvanized wire 2. Metal stakes: 24 inch T-stakes 3. Metal posts: 8'-0" T-stakes 4. Nylon strap: 3" wide 12" long white nylon strap with (1) %2" brass grommet in each end or ENGINEER approved equivalent. F. Drainage Fill Drainage fill shall be 3/8"-3/4" native crushed stone. IPART 3 -EXECUTION 3.01 INSPECTION Examine sub grade and verify conditions under which work is to be performed. Notify General CONTRACTOR and ENGINEER of unsatisfactory conditions. 3.02 BED PREPARATION Preserve and retain excavated native soil for reuse. Remove any debris and rocks larger than I". ' 3.03 SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING Place plants in a position on bed areas before cans have been removed. Obtain approval from ENGINEER. ENGINEER reserves right to interchange or shift locations of plants prior to planting. Remove burlap from upper % of ball on BB plants. Plant where located, setting plants with tops of balls even with tops of beds. Backfill with native soil and compact soil carefully around each plant ball. Water thoroughly to eliminate air pockets. Carefully prune plants to remove dead or broken branches and hand-rake bed areas to smooth even surfaces. 3.04 TREE L P ANTING A. Ornamental Trees and Shrubs 1. Stake locations for approval by ENGINEER. 2. Plant in pits 12 inches larger than ball for small to medium trees and shrubs, 24 inches larger than ball for large trees and shrubs or to edge of tree leave-outs in paved areas. 02 05 - 2 LAND 9 1 SOAPING 1 1 3. Fill material should be the native soil removed from the hole. No planting mix or soil amendments should be used. 4. Glazed sides of mechanically dug holes should be roughened or scarified to allow root penetration. 5. Carefully settle by watering to prevent pockets. B. Root Balls Root balls shall be properly located in relationship to adjacent soil as required by referenced standards. 1. Planting holes must be dug to allow root balls to be completely I underground, leaving stem-root transition zones at finished grade level. 2. Balls set too deep or too shallow shall be carefully removed and replanted as required by the ENGINEER. 1 3.05 PERENNIAL PLANTING A. Prepare planting beds as indicated on drawings. Provide two feet of thoroughly mixed and prepared soil as follows: 1. 1/3 sandy loam topsoil, (mix one part sand with three parts topsoil). ' 2. 1/3 ground aspen flakes. 3. 1/3 peat moss. 4. 20 lbs. Jirdon Nitroform nitrogen 12-9-14 per cubic yard. B. Replace existing soil with planting mix. P g p g C. Space plants as indicated on drawings. Obtain approval of plant layout of ENGINEER before planting. ENGINEER reserves right to interchange locations of plants prior to planting. Dig hole in plant mix, set plants and 1 water in thoroughly to settle,but do not compact. 3.06 LANDSCAPE FABRIC After planting has been completed and approved by the ENGINEER, install landscape fabric across any planting bed. Sheets of fabric should have a six-inch overlap minimum. At the bed margins, fabric should be installed under the bottom ' LANDSCAPING 02905 - 13 of the plastic edging. Fabric lapping outside the edging should be trimmed to ' below grade and buried when the edging is backfilled. Fabric should be well anchored with 6 stakes pounded flush with the grade. Plant openings must be large enough to allow for future growth. 3.07 TOP DRESSING After landscape fabric has been installed and accepted by the ENGINEER, top dress bed areas with bark or rock mulch, three inches deep. Fabric must not be exposed or protrude above the mulch or edging. 3.08 TREE WRAPPING Wrapped trees will not be accepted. 3.09 PRUNING OF NEW TREES A. Do not cut back terminal branches. Remove sucker growth and broken or badly bruised branches. Thin native trees more heavily than nursery grown plants. ' B. Follow referenced standards and prune material as directed. 3.10 TREE SAUCERS Form a four-inch high saucer around each new tree for deep watering. . CONTRACTOR is responsible for deep watering until final acceptance. Tree saucers are not required for trees with drip irrigation system installation. 3.11 TREE GUYING AND STAKING A. Stake and trees immediate) following planting guy y g p g operation. Take precautions during guying operation to prevent damage or injury to branches and roots. Orient all stakes within each cluster or row of trees in the same direction or as directed by ENGINEER. 1 B. Trees of over 1" caliper should be staked with woven nylon straps and wire. Tension on ties should be adequate to support tree, but slack enough to permit movement and the development of reaction wood. Ties cannot be fastened tightly to trunks: free movement or slack equal to at least twice the caliper must be allowed. 3.12 PLANTING BED EDGING Install vinyl edging at interface of planted areas and lawn areas unless indicated otherwise on Drawings. Anchor securely with stakes provided with each length 1 02905- 14 LANDSCAPING • of edging at even intervals. Set edging as indicated in true lines as designed with top of edging one inch above finish grade. 3.13 CLEANUP Keep premises neat and orderly including organization of storage areas. Remove trash and debris from excavated planting areas,preparing beds, or planting plants from site daily as work progresses. Keep paved areas clean by sweeping or hosing. End of Section 02905 1 LANDSCAPING 02905 - 15 i � PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT � AMENITIES 1 i 1 1 .:ice`•'•' _ �: ..-.-_.:::ii`�r.t-:+::5' • ' 'S�:1::;;w4.;—S�L':1 r � "j � iy.j 1.•:r r.p:;!.:4,''• C: ''.,;(- ��, fir: ,-u�:.:a!c=.•^:_�.{ +'.'' �'��;;:. �.} �y-";2j^ r,ri °S :+ny;.,k• �[' T ,', is !�:. L'cnvr t—. LY n,�iJ . is it 5 1 7:`Ilj �. .. .. a';rk^rw" iTeMiq 4 WITH A STRONG COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE FUTURE 1E b OF OUR ENVIRON- MENT--.EPS -. •-4 . ........ . s c0 ns an y - improving upon:-: product a .: its own persist`ent:'' strive for excellence:,in:'e;n is ' ■ Ir.::; •!a1C>Nc�.,gii:v,a,,:.: ::�,.,,._.,MC.^L:?'Yi'u�,d.� �" ..q•.1t1`l�� '•1.-:'1�. J.° .13" �':•r.PY•"r�"'':°'::�u�°al::,:....u� , �:;hTH,'.2'�'i ui^ ':A .J4 ;q!^'i ,...Y�NL+rJli�.•• ..q- ':.:�:!:...l.' ..... .. Ott C�,� Y. - - '•fir,• ,'�+: i I t^���: .L,• I d:� m'anufac.turin •1 .c - ,�... a� ::�°*C'J•q-Pig �''%7; ^,S?t:� r...,. �.. .,.. ..d>. :y.;�:,,• � 4 j { ::��!g:. - •G•a . �t r:. V! f !I�•P ^, -J, y ems , .. � .•h CaTI today to ! ea.a R u ote fort a= :ridi y. ■■/My■■ o00, u ct. : C,: �.:STy: °-G.•�' Yh�-°,ra:{�i :¢.n;_.. i;f' ( � � Ce':�:1'r 'i..1 1 •P:. Ji .:4C. C.,a>. �rr� �- P•29,(..�:.;":v.�� '•h' �f-,!''GS.iJfd�,.;]!.r•:, ,:;,"[� ';hs°� .a �' r3.t, T}"tFYf^l.'. �xi,•(!...�f; ".1;'_ ,•:12 � i +.'�I[:f '• '�l,ttt.�Y� ;�.v.� 1't •�'��J ei�':f.•`:F.;'^. ?r,G fi !y;'i•�'•:..g��:r;i'�.`:':;'.: 77l• :V., J, - ;���,,d,.a �� ru. ^!ii:Z�:u�.q�,e:�-;:'`�^'e.•'i~'+;::+,.:.::!�_,,.. 5,1• :�,' ::+>' ::r I,.. ;t �tti R.:e•`[:7°�:r:::4'::!.'.:'., f 4 N qe' ;i• m .i� •r..• +� ,,-'�'a'� ;?�1i55�',d;..,7;:-.,,,.-;":t � s is t�.Sti;� `�C+&•G'P:: F.iE4+.�: ::i>!i.,J �ao:•d;t..•T'' � 7 '� x '.�,{:f, kry .i�t,�,4A1f6?.. ,E� �.eNEob��,gt �i �;;Sw .� �•`.cli<3:': '•Ji i�rrY9,'.:'s<;i ,'��de �"v�' {e• �'�'r•' a•t .willWe man ears 3of fUn : •�'t "y. n'r,` •'•;..,yr:.., :• :Ii:A��:4:TL�X=T,_Il:::_.:.:.. ii..� •:u -a•: ,r'r..-I { .p5' ":'y�Y.., 6� :aP%.>. i.:7f iLr `tn,M,,,-vk y.i,.., ,•,n., 0-11 05 I C ���5e" d! u e, uc:a t is o n a`n d: r e s iai a :�:'11-..�, "'� ti•';{Y J;x'b'�',C*°}',:� <:ih. :ig:-'• jlii� ,:�"�° :!�' :��p� r.:V r�. eiFv;•;, w..e..r. - '+di f�G�'id..(E1r��',y 'R..w;`:• .� �ijt'�• ,•J� �4� 8 >^L':^ .1:,:. J.J. ,i:•. .V! i•F.'w .n• .5g �? `:.f..:E, _S r1:�m7_.,It`� Cha__� 'N7 J � •�«5; �� up :lj y •1 .f. L- ii:r• `� b. •.lu• G.. 'ice L r: �s •+c �rJ. �sia:3x ( :•�s. •1 •aJ ia(`l• :�:� �l.r '+'.n y./:trir'.'i i;S`:'' = 4' - ._'r. G.. iV::�'Of�.,I.T'd• rA34C':) - . j :in .r 1��Y4'�,: ..-1","?`;i., = ,,fi5:.,1"�.•',^':e ..r ..�,y,_u,. '.e£'.a tti.�•M!hi•r�+•..iyl,; /...�ryr-''-.':,� 1,.�'�•..'"��' ,(�+9P,�,i:: .,"J,oL,: .7Sq:q�,�'1;'Ar,N,..t ,,;,�.,. g7'lit_� y 'T' �p ,.�� ..f�,:,,E7a��4 y#._.: ..yz'3. .'ir's.; '"- .'il^.,p.l.:, [W.4�;'.4.f.•:'�''.°.'�,1=+9°'g4 P.:Y.W, rw'Iai �' .:,,� ry .t,i a ''�h r �•t-�f�.y,G.r �'� q: ,.I•:' �>,� n,. :4' -P �.:r ••r.: b iee L7 Qa 50 8586 ...:. .,..••.-:(ids• r� ;'..ri•• •�.. �'�. of,w :bnGj.r•, ,��y. `,1+., - .:i"r,:.,' '»i 4ky>r�� •,d„t, .y;`' 'r..... .,'jai ,:h�. •} .,� .1:-.90' -6.7�.4 ESA: -7�52 Mw 1,a^ zr•• - 4 _ x. •1`�90�Fa ..4 - 9 -+J%:. .4"!' ,l•.� •.(-.. npiti,:E••:.:%1... ..T::L.. C.;t.ar. _ . ....n. ...�.'�°.�...- 4 ri.,..�.e}ta.. -.Y:: ...,"•�'••'-'e} :i:'i,.,�- Jl l m '�j,:..: .?J.✓r-%r .` 011l! ''y• N':,?.:' s:i6, .:? .:_: .�.„J, .. ..�.:..r ....._::. .. .. „I..,..a'.T�...:. �_ ...•,:^:YEN.:" - ...t,_•.vy- l�^ -,R' „s!•R'.FC'rl�•g•� •J"5;'•.;'-• ._pM:=?9�':�aJ'. [.: .- . .•v�•w,.C'�'•� .�:::. R �' •�ar• ::T;`� !��: :•3[: ;:�:lii,m "�"�•-. �. .,-.-"r�,•�''.b...�M:F. r•:•e !�:: ':J' .:a X'. <N. .,uM+ .,!: _,.�w;,, ,�:s:a:3��': .:c.�,},_�,u. - ..�y,' .i:.',,c:r�yY:, W.r,-r.,:+_<,. P,,.t,! •�,. ,xr°�:b'• :;,r..:'�;,,_. ,r .: :�+:. ,•;:v '1. '•+,., '� +Jr ,^::r' :.1'ibrp'jl:. .•eN'I��i.�"'�! a•�. 'n,�.+:^ :u�!.•1• -::A%e.yT�.". ..pri• ..".%'.'7'r'•i..�V,i_�� yr��ay. j ::5:: r.r :7•: - ;i •,rJ:..•' r''uy.t' j';- .n'T P. /�,, ��•• 'p r ::,•n}�•c. '.Irv- .Y, �^V �./7 �'id'^".ta•+ .i!"'� '.'b. :•l([,'`•{,. �:a. w �x'9'y -,c'.' ,+»}•�,.[i.G f+.� al ,tv _ _.w � ,'the.y� .•^,,v+:'...... { :. .r�7}.:"-;'::•" ': ..'... .'{:�l`..1°r.". .•..:`;n° ... �•yn4 .,r.. „y,,:r�r.': }G:a. :.t::' .u.T"r :7.n � i .r••:', "oY.:i :u� ..� ,,a.�.r'' `';t•9 '.i�^ 6.:, t ;�?y,..��a:,�;!,....y 4.. .,. .,.. ° llyF,r.^5.:.,: 4;,p<,a*I'..J.I �^L..r:.°.-r[ _ :: :'•.. S:rrA^: ':r. �.r::x� - .2i:•Y.,w ... .. ,. ° ,:er: :. .:ti'�':'<�:' ... •,r.'..:;'r._••.:a';:' �•::Jv.'�-'=J':�•►,'6i�i3.iG�:Ct:Y*id'+a�'$ko-+••yW:.�:..�'-'+::i;_r �<° . . . .-...a,••�'l_<,:._w.b'f`.Wit_.__._..rv...•a..:w•...... : .... .:.�..,:.....r': � �.__..<.s�'�B•a.,Jl�._.. .�..:...x .wi"rY':::' ......... .._ - - Y .777 7 7q 7-'! {417i ,�.,'�i"r(`lrn.' . �•'' { 7 Ii.•v� '' psyN`� .L, ' rb .r r 9• � t f e , � `� n ,r �� I 4 t 'r ylt•,i tii r,r rr xrr Ili .L. al'rl+*��,,�+.s,,�/,,•��;�F><S-, ` n Yy ti.. , ,d}�•.v!',�'1 r a jW;5 t„} rv�j ''' d R'a'!9 r is � r � �{, $ r Lw,yr'��.• nw�a J ,�.� .- � � #4 c•M �,' }, ! , fY►. '� r ! y Y r" �� '�� n Id:�r ; PHA r i* �1 � ��y�e`-:.Y t• ..� � s �•' 4 i + 1£ r �: r" tr ,;{, � t t rn r# :,,rtiG`�C_ �'Y� �:``1,+; 1 11r i r.. c L' i ti Fes' .t C. -•��.. .� ,.! r, .�. r � .r � �,,. �r,vs. 1 tik' ••Y r!4 ! � y�is • �y , 'rY V' � r.c•� �� �� }�� -.all �L/�• RI ,. f y3i la...au-w k:'*it r�}R' Y �.tb 7 :'�,.G.i• ',Zr'' t 4l' ;'b7�'' n.. !t .�.i'i? �,y' M .� 4 }J i.,.Y {C .,' 4 t (t(+�',f t 'd. �.4 ,a F r �r' ;•�r �' lt,� a #c� rij. r .���f � � � ',�, . •� :C, a e N�r� `• �'.. ,si 4 4 'r ('ar2{r " '!> P�,, it}y I� .+��, �, i��` � �• ��„ a _ - ,K .r-4-444 h Y 4 �'"Y �y�; 1 ;, ��:.•� �' off. ��.� > t.h • '' 1'•� . ,' � ,r K ' ,L�� •t. • �� � � Y� � 1 S "int and ! � r Q ' I ; M ca� he re `o.+ed °1 y easily from EnviroPlayTM l�y Required Space:33' x 44' Systems surfaces.. � 1 �O _O . O {� L �> CD Lo O L N 1 ' O :<r •:�;u...�-,��t��c`e'�„r+r Illy 0. cc y 'Yf4�r ' 1r w .yl�rit ' ; •r �r W • .. W coo �'s ' '. • mil ( 4 w. r Q uld ca t • 2 •. r�' /, it .I �� � �•'i'7.V �,' ,a 4 � { ON E H � • , ' . . ::...:.. `... .' :_, ' :: 1 EnviroPlaySystems sF i E5 General Series: For complete specifications and parts list for any product seen in this catalog please call:Toll Free USA 1-800-250-8586 or 1-909-674-7529 (PLAY). Basic Series:This is a simple, less complex version of the "G" series.This series fills the general playground system needs but with a tighter budget in mind. eq�-SCHOO< • sF t E S Pre-School Series: This series is designed for the pre-school or daycare, meeting the needs for 2-5 year olds. ��ENITjF� EnviroPlaySystems sF i ES Amenities Series:This series is designed for accessorizing parks, playgrounds, camping facilities and more. Call for our latest brochure. 0 17 �� ES Sports Series:This series is for the sports related activities at playgrounds, schools, apartment complexes and more. For n7 re in ' rniation i r' listed above or more details on the o fo o r m} of the product series !s c o prodhrcts foeu7d in this catalog please contact EPS or yocu- local distrihutoi. 1 Environmental ' PlaySystems CorpTM Toll Free USA 1-800-250-8586 - 1-909-674-7529 (PLAY) - Fax 1-909-674-5949 PO Box 599 Lake Elsinore, CA 92531 USA - www.enviroplay.com l A Comp?ete set of Sita., Furnishings 1 Designed for Children! �j KID PICNIC TABLE; A' 'long - cell- I?•"sear he;gh . KID TRASH RECEPTACLE: 2; call -holds kicch en size crass can.. �j /Sl�oi bn i viii7�, ' .e?f olcil KID BENCH: `''lonc se I(heicVlTable �. Kid 6 V ❑ YJY i�-`� S r= � ?r KidTrash i . Kid Bench ' I _ �i i 11 I I . }r°' r:'� ..'••,`•:•RI IlttlJll/ll tllil 1 1 p'):r:n;�,;�.. -a__ ardy' �i''•..n:1A1H1,.:,.. ':�t, 4,.%'+ .f�i4r4v;•4i^r::1.::y�,�;., ir�6,,;y jy ,; :„7:w°J. ff .. .t., '•r. ''i`�4i±+,�:ii: ,a•.ii:ahy:1.6,,ai;• �kyfr :S O- m :.':•':•L '"�?v .a,, i. � 1,i<1,;''.y;:.::::. ''ri:lies•�tiSx i!+;y! gem IL 1 !q � ....ti:,!'r'h"l;d.;[A;•,d�':::"Fplf:(l:;t''' �-,;-',�••.„_��: dal,.;, y,,,_a,.)., .: ,r=a'-' _ )'��;�{ ,I 4PI J 1A,•:,••. 7 .. y�, t ��''•�' CYJ!'Yr - 4 . . f �b3✓• °.[" •'dam ! 4�:°�#,.%�' y'sk.: stihi Y .,.�.G'.�!'� ?' .�.r. ✓d '?''i'`r•�!:'' ,+�,9 ..,�ii ,' �:y:;.,. :P_51.... .p +4' ':c.��':+]5y,.jd r..h•,a,• r:..t"' iG- '•t, :?yt'i".c,. .. �,Ly c.lnijl 1'(,::.a..•n,�7J",` t%':?'F !31 ti•,�,:,.,,,L'tl'�:.�'.lil.,! �,,:.. �,,,i,)., yIIV,� 'i ,r,• '•�i•',:; `ur,y-'y:5d. :,p,:4A' v,',dw.' ��•.�;'.•.id; .,) hl hr, '��! SIr.�.U..�rJ:;;',:'}•f° ..Y.:,,.1'::;��1`9.rf�4",, t�,.1,:,. ... :.�SII;,�•;1!yi�,'r Y.' ..r _hi .i�„x..•wJ,' I� -rc,A:!+•�%dt. :.L,,,:.rrl ,„fir.:.,.;:Y;t;•' f:;{g:h'., '6y(:'y,:,!1.s + ':;, !n. tr!„d. _.;, �'i��=;'�.''i:;n.,r Fl:..r..:f•I ,!.<o„),.t�• �-� 4rL, ,� F !�s•�'� h is �- tit',,:' (l ra., •1'.'.;�. 7i. .. Cn_.. - '1.. .'1i.'S',f'''el1'! '`'1,.1al..9 ) ",1';,f;,.9•!r r,-rr a .�!•rf ra. Ir �.qc 1:: I �:J:r,""�(.',..�a,?• .,'j. it'p.. •.4' :4 ,I !r-.�i. �1' �11 � ':�r 1 t111�::::'�:.tL:J,�A'i•c'.t�ln,,.4' ..,7:',:.'r'.1'+.. •�:i..: `` '1�!i ,A It' l.,}:t''''•�r: I •v ,°•+hN r !•+� ;i.'!•�rr� i;.,;:. .:•„�•:;:i l i,;:'.; :r•r•:.'''•IY ;•01.;' 1.,. •H� "'i•". 2 •�d-:1 Ir _•t:i:;' .-... , `�^,Y x, 7n�*NAy,u��'� !i.. ^.il•'r'''p.•,`� �S\�i� Yil.�•- 1 � ppp IJ"(-t M �•�� .t I r•. � :tt 1 '1-�',:(N�:jG y:i:' ti?h}�•:M1 1 .�'1.„ :tt:'�� - r:l'. �'t� .�. ti'•.R, ' ,, .�nr ......::::..: +:.,.....,.._ :� :Y.�•• ems.^. .. AA 3•'•. ]� t} r I_ mot: r :.i'•�rrf," .yc '�t�• y .fl1 �( •.F rK II ,A:i• r; :r p�� ,y n '9 r ti ��. �r a 15•' •i;" r• ., r' 4 CC i - L i: 1:. yy I 1•(V V L „y d7. `.;. vN•:" Vgp,i jj '-ice 7"x` ���•• - a r:. iE I 1 1.6 t 'V ?•1, :1�' �'�., yl:;::,,'�..�-;�L C+ C-i:�i, w� '.f�.,s 3.'s'TrJ.�.- �`' t ;p,,.,r: ..,+ .t Z..i:i.<':.Vi"-'.isa•zri' �•D• ii- . ,:. �.rt+ �^•,I• .•YCi.'1 1, s•� i �tits';ril7p.�p ,!. 1 *— tJ t•i' _ 1 .. tai U•a is - .�1 d 'iicl� _ i e:i P �ead Y ;'�qui tii�nt uiil!ship ist fo' •.,., tined:':• pp ;W2�ks or 1esSaroin th cel tis. fth¢:oi'der:' . . r. .`� :.,..�::'t•-;.:... ..Y...: •.•,.,..,t,. .��.• :,, . .�� e .�. m t'is;m�' '•l.. rr ;,-_ _ ::y:;.,;,,''' C,�y:a`>t>:4•r.�-_, ..-r . .:'�1ilt �?. i�de'fmm' } pterf 4�C •, IIo. 4' \ •M , i f "•r 1- T:�j -Y S 1 1. c „ i t 1 h((� err 1 �\ a r .3 t c •'7, i:'Y' itA,f9�,• 9`1•)%••' ,j..11r: r'.' `r �h..• r•rL• 'Y ?:: .: .. .. ..Lr,':r:i'�,i•1 .'l.,j..?;.'.j;,,.7,: t, dl.,. it t6i.alydf`1it.l:n':. � la �\., ' i:`'Ity :�' :' •: 1' .y�"��'��jV•`,f ! ... . n,,i.,, :r.::^'ni: •.Xl:'•i.7�1:1 t�tt rod •! 1', .��., lf1 1, J .. _ .. : j;:;:(^ Y '::7�j!I,, •.:7 :i. 1 y,"'I r?•,y j''t� Lft3 •'//` -.i ,.!"°°.'.i:�l 4,,e.:�, ,j,.:•''"•�':,;, •'�li:1nq • ,�fi .��: ,.� la-� (: .y i''?,L :y `�?}(•. i',':I•: s`. 11!:t•"�'i,/!• .�••3.�1y1f �: �� .,.r.' "_ '.J I- '� 1:-:::,'!.��;..'. 1:'�.,::,!J;•�� t.•I(,Iq,�,t.,64+!!.t �'�4;reik: t�ka: :• �! ` i;•tl' 4 rt:,�ndC:;r� fI�{q�„7;� {qyL^ {.+� H•!'-�_ .i :I:\:ems � •a._ :,'.�.';:. I'r'•„ 'wti•I ':1 F):7�:�. •�:•. gJ"gl!:.r :Il• i::.::.^.,,•.. %.�i•' 1!d:);,a•'�j'L•'1.' 'r.,Ll�:i 1�:�:i:+' j. ... I .. .. 'jS'•;',..i 7'yi'"f•,.�I rd,:..l11`,:,1 •1 t;'• rionmental Envi ..t,r - 7 r.Via' _ 'i:',:•� � .1 x+7 l yn a° �:.v.,•,...1 ,ter,F{I: .l',. ,;Luw J:;w,'"SS'. .•t:'Ir%.�irl'' `iI I,.•:u-c ,' 7:r T5 _ M Or toPYS ast �it e....� ,75,'"'•.r - r •1 ..'r. .7 ry ,Y a:.• yr: +1.,, ,d•,;,, ;e'; ',., e'S,7 r4 (cr)r. ,,r'4r. y,;r:�,... ., :,1.•,,.,:r "•4t '�`'!•.'4 - :;r� 'i'` �.�::r:.'Ln:.r6•.. C�4:°n;e.r✓•1.(7,,:. rJ.,:, 1::::' i ,.••,liln't.� �,,.., k: • •A Q • • _ uv:'iS::.1.:xn•..iLL4cw'it.11"J,:IJ:..G:'tu.,;_,4i ;'1.:: • 0 • '�';i.:�::):'TY+i:(', '1;7;ti,��j•3i;;^,}'yh;i;t;,nti)i.'t, 1 • • A P P � `PHASE 1/PARK MASTER v PLAN L N D I X B I m I c 0 0 m 1 - - - - - - - - - r' f - - _ _ _ I I g m j ! _� 2 m LEGEND V) ' BaBter Lane I __-_- - -- ---- ---.-.. _ _ (CBS) COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE - 7 0 _ �i� CBS cLi Z - �- F (PGA) PRAIRIE SPIRE GREEN ASH - 18 3 Z^ �� u (ELM) BP.ANDON AMERICAN ELM 4 Y o �z�z r-------------------- ''^• I I pp59 p, 'C.`'1 (SHL) SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST - 6 `o, -- j(SHL) I IpPRK r y�0p��' I--------------- j SOCCER j ' e'� f' .{. j .' ', (NWM) NORTHWOODS MAPLE - 6 0 ( ) 1 PRACTICE 1 CLASS TYP) ' Y:- sHL i FIELD i = NORTHERN HACKBERRY- 7 Q y (HAK)- I I ( a raC ) 1 I RTD I---------------- s ( SHL I Q f •tr 4 _ WETLANDS i c ' I (NWM) (Cl-) (NWM) (ELM) A �ytl� (7YP) __—__— (OMA) OAKLEAF MOUNTAIN ASH - 5 : O _ � tll� � COMA) - ( ) I______________ ` ; Q ~ Z v Trade Wind Lane (R ��WL) ~i I (PSP) PRARIE SKY POPLAR - 9 W Q a Z Q 0 Ir O I i j Q ' (HAK) HAK " ! -------- - (GWL) GOLDEN WALLOW - 1 J W U 1 ( ) (HAK) + (HAK) } (HAK) r-(Rro) i---------------- Q Z COd. (HAK) � (SBe) SILVER BUFFALO BERRY- 5 c ' CC (ELM) (HAK) - I c• (OMA) YT F (RTD) REDTWIG DOGWOOD - 9 • W O (OMA) Lu Trade Wind Lane Z G Q Qt (OMA) ! W O 1 � (CBS) ' u r------------� (PGA) I----------- o_ CLASS I TRAIL 1 I ------ a (8' WADE TYP) j (PGA) i — I I ' (PSP) I SOCCER 1 =-------------- - I. PRACTICE j(PGA) — — — �� 1 FIELD I — — 33yy NOTE: " I I I CITY OF BOZEMAN PARKS 44 DEPARTMENT.TO APPROVE TRAM. MATERIAL PRIOR 7p I I(PCA) --—--— ____----------_ INSTALLATION. O O U C O C C O O to N - 00 I(PGA) .� I - •C >.0 aa°O LO o --�---ir ,�i•�pi�0'' I I ---------- ---• O C �O ' R .Q I [ I 0) CO 91 1 I ro O CTD) SOCCER - -- W Z `n v PRACTICE I(PGA) -------------- � ,., ox (SBB) FIELD i _ � '0 m u- Tschache Lane (CBS) i i(PGA) — ,t — — ' 3 Ta (ELM) ---------- SHL) I 1 I -r.. --------------J(PGA) 5 ,. (OMA) t" ---- DESIGN BY.• Z j (SHL) -— -- - — — - N- MARY KECK 1-0, 4 ' ( ) .. CREATIONSiy ' ELM GARDEN(SHL) NWM):. I _ FEB. 2005 W --------------- CNWM) (NWM)., G ' , (ASH) Y•+,+ ?' / -_ ` (ASH) 3 60 0 60 120 Sheet No. somle lest P-1 ' NORTH PARK AREA 6 I t Copyright 0 2005 HKM Engineering Inc.. All Rights Reserved. I m I c O a m O T AMIN� go 6 eJ I (SBB) ': ; FIELD i I • N q•,A + — e Tschache Lane �°y (CBS) LEGEND :(PGA)- a I I m o i (ELM) ISHL) I I I (CBS) COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE - 3 Z (OMA) ^�' j-------------1(PGA) ' w H. I - — — - ~- (SHL - _ _ ---- ------ (PSP) RARIE SKY POPLAR - 5 3- - !I 1 ( ) :' (SHL) (NWM) J �✓ O �`C �W¢o w M) 1 • a �zr 2 ., (NWM)5 (SBB) SILVER BUFFALO BERRY - 6 (ASH) •-` H)' S •� ` ' +g�--_----- , (ASH) ��_ / �� ��� 1 '%6 (RTD) REOTWIG DOGWOOD - 5 rn (ASH) y,4, • 1 ,�•�., ^ -�S (ELM) BRANDON AMERICAN ELM - 4 0 H ., (EU). (ASH) / / -. (NWM) NORTHWOODS MAPLE - 5 a Z ♦c WETLANDS - `,� sacs Q W (TYP) d Q � TYP _ (ASH) (YTD) YELLOW TwIG�DOGWOOD - s 0 0 } _ CLASS I TRAIL • � t � o Q • U f- / o v (8' WIDE TYP) � +a, (ASH) Q s o_L <'`�`� (CCH) COMMON CHOKECHERRY CLUMP - 4 W W a �,; CLASS 11 TRAIL-7 ` }'• -—i (PSP) (6' WIDE TYP) (TCA) PARK SIGN a Z Q O Q (CBS) t i�I "�SH) (ASH) < (ASH) NORTHERN TREASURE ASH - 11 c OJ.N Cl) CC I` Y 0 C Q Q a Q. TOT LOT / �. m Z 'I�. •(N ) (TCA) (EOM) EMERALD QUEEN MAPLE - 3JQ (SBB). 3 ~ ! _ ( � (RTD) i{•,l- (CBS) `� _ (EQM)' .t y'= (OAK) BUR OAK - 2 0 W W (CCH) EOM - (TCA) THUNDERCHILDD! CRABAPPLE - 3 0 xn 1.. ' '�0?�' (OAK) 1 Q 1 - - - I , CLASS 11 TRAIL (EOM): •y ' (6' WIDE TYP) •�:,, (RTD) - P ' r-------------i •.i, ' i NOTE: ti CITY BOZ N PARKS(OMA) YD) B) DEPARTMENT TO APPROVE 1 I TRAIL MATERIAL PRIOR TO -----------�-- INSTALLATION. 'O CL$%SS I TRAIL !(ASHf m -�'•, �(8� WIDE TYP) I tJ C3 CV \ i SOCCER i :.: A .o = ^ o a ' (nD) i FIELD PRACTICE (ASH ------ —_I— c o N Lo � � (D o 0)0-4 �� � o0O0 `m �3 \ ' ' I ppASFi ._ 01 ay a o ' n , -` CCH I Uo N o X v O Q (YTD) L--------------1 '0 C33 �li n (NWM (ASH) (ELM) (ELM) I 4 \ (ELM) 3.v(ELM) L9 —rt DESIGN BY z MARY `DW) �(SBS) - N GARDENECK CREATIONS us ;fly (CCH) FEB. 2005 LLJ i e Lane 's`� .; ELM I - '� 2 ree'l �' (SBS) (PSP) I 60 0 60 120 Sheet No. g scale feet' P_/'�CENTRAL PARK AREA L ti Copyright ®2005 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. �1 M r = = = = = = = r r Q\04\SOE7110\PUD-FINAL\dig\WM-Windrintend-Pmkdwg 3/14/2005 1:56:05 PM MST I I I Ib I l i II , I 1 1� ' a Cb Hunters Way 1 1 rt I l \ % lT I ` �co �fccTCC I sr o o k (I�CC l L �N I JTL O A"'-- PARK ` D A4R�Ssi 00 I JTL},' PARK AREA�� ,� q� y j JTL}' . z RF by JTL} (A v , kcc It cc i cc own v _ 0— -•I c'mac (Ac � I I t 0 t (TC l ICI} _ � - Tc I a I naapd i j j j j". , I I I g I I I JT� I I _ Gale Court b --- ------------, ( S R % l (P I I n - , s ( S I I I i j j I ----------------- i ! 4 Y i �� ® .�. }:•'y a. {��:+. ;".'bay 1�` � �'.y N O ��o S2 Z _ A O + �o g l g v m v >0 r� N N m ON � I In � I � I ON c rn 0D I ¢ a I u o N N V A II III N 0 0 N �C'm ozrn rn rn 00 n l D p I J u m m m FL n •Project: 045067.110•West-Winds-Internol-Park.dwg•Date MARCH 2O05 •Designed MK •Drawn SE •Checked DS •Approved — t No. Revision By Date HKM Engineering Inc. WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY WARNING .� m McChesney Professional Bldg. BOZEMAN, MT Dom' ' 0 601 Nikles Dr.,Suite 2 II.THIS BAR DOES w Bozeman,MT 59715 NOT MEASURE'; (406)586-8834 WEST WINDS COMMUNITY PARK THEN DRAWING IS SOUTH PARK AREA (PHASE 1) NOT To SCALE 1 ENGINEERING FAX(406) 586-1730 r � � � � � �■ � ii r � w� � � � � r■ � � w s • • rr r rr r rr rr rr rr r rr rr r rr rr rr rr �r rr rr ¢\04\SO07110\am-FDM\pro\Wnt-W*d�int.ne-Pa&dwg 3/14/2005 1:5e:05 PM MST Buckrake Avenue _� .----------------- .ti --- -_----------------- I j a j Davis Lane D —�— __ I ' Z 1 I 1 1 j I Springview Court Cale Court M ; ' A- > ir 1 - ' �--- -� .III•t^s � 1I ]� , I ►� Tempest Court m_ 1 , aAke- . 1 8 tog 1 AVjr thyA6p7i D c� n z� � l� � Windward Avenue ti� — ---- -------------- Cb IPT' m 1 ' 1 1 a 1 •� 1 1 O D O i; Mm \ rn rn o o 1 IQ Z z T I x ii� way Z i Hinters Z ' 0 �� _ m rf ^, i i;%�'•' ��� ,ram•}�; 1 p m s Z ` A A C Z Z O O g 6 Z o a . 9 I g s n ,r A 0 Z�04=O C 2A � C b 9 D O No O p < am pa m z Z N I P;<yiQi I I x gz-� 4a o u In o I , (A rn O V) A �A<<� O 4. 0 OmLA I �— —2n!!M— D O< y of z 4nm C g y 8 2 a O 7m Z 3 V) ~ O n •Project: 045067.110•West—Winds—Internal—Park.dwg•Date MARCH 2O05 •Designed MK •Drawn SE Checked DS •Approved _ HKM Engineering Inc. WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY WARNING No. Revision eY Date McChesney Professional Bldg. BOZEMAN, MT Dom' 0 601 Nikles Dr.,Suite 2 IF THIS BAR DOES Bozeman,MT 59715 WEST WINDS COMMUNITY PARK NOT MEASURE 1 THEN ORA Nc Is (406) 586-8834 w1 EAST & WEST TRAIL - PARK AREA EXTENSIONS NOT TO SCALE ENGINEERING FAX (406)586-1730 DECIE JAN 2 4 l DEPARTMENT Of AND COMMUNITY DDt:Lu1-- , FEB 16 1007 DEPA9 TMENT Or'_A?M'MG AND COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT 1 'Subdivision Phase la & b i Condominiums Final Site Plan January 2007 ' Prepared By: ENGINEERING .- 601 Nikles Dr. Suite 2 'Bozeman, MT 59715 Job No. 04S067.120 . . _ . t _ � - � �. �� . , L , : � . , , . _ , a . f _f� . . d � � 1 r s �< F. , � � _ ,� �� i ' ._ ,. � � � � � / �_ �. � �• �� i .. . . . ,1 i _ i .� - y � ' .. � _ Y i _ �, � , , � � � � � _ _ , � - �i � 1 i � i ,, � _ f � ) d � � ,_ � - _. - � ', .. ., �, ,. � �. -( l � � _ f � � � /. ._ _ � � .. � � .. �i. � � � t � .. , ENGINEERING January 16, 2007 McChesney Professional Building H:\04\S067120\Final site plan letter.doc 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Mr. Martin Knight Phone: 406.586.8834 Fax: 406.586.1730 City of Bozeman, Planner www.hkminc.com 20 E. Olive P.O. Box 1230 ' Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 ' RE: West Winds Phase 1 Condos Final Site Plan Dear Knight: The following is in response to the City of Bozeman Planning Directors Staff Report dated October 10,2006. Below is narrative for both code provisions and recommendations for approval provided in the staff report. CODE PROVISIONS o Section 18.34.100.0 requires the applicant must submit seven(7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, ' corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. Enclosed o Section 18.34.130 requires that a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation,but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED.Noted o Section 18.34.130 states that the applicant upon submitting the Final Site Plan for Pp p g approval by the Planning Director, and prior to the issuance of a building permit, will also submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval and code provisions have been satisfied or met.Noted o Section 18.38.050.F requires all mechanical equipment to be screened. Rooftop equipment should be incorporated into the roof form and ground mounted equipment shall be screened with walls, fencing or plant materials.Mechanical equipment will be located between the units and screened from the public roads with the use of planted landscaping, as shown on sheet L-1. o Section 18.40.090A&B states that a condominium association shall be established for each condominium development. The developer shall prepare bylaws for the condominium association, as well as covenants, conditions and restrictions for the ' BILLINGS,MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN,WYOMING LANDER,WYOMING 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 406.234.6666 307.672.9006 307.332.3285 0 West Winds Condominiums December 2006 Final Site Plan Submittal ' condominium development, in compliance with Chapter 18.72 of this title. The bylaws, covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the granting of final site plan approval. The proposed project will be under covenants set forth by West Winds Subdivision. A separate set of covenants for the condominiums was provided in the preliminary site plan review and are enclosed. Once the Planning Department has given their approval they will be filed with the Clerk and Recorders Office. o Section 18.42.170 states the size of the trash receptacle shall be appropriately sized for the use and approved by the City Sanitation Department. Accommodations for recyclables must also be considered. All receptacles shall be located inside of an ' approved trash enclosure. A copy of the site plan, indicating the location of the trash enclosure, dimensions of the receptacle and enclosure and details of the materials used, shall be sent to and approved by the City Sanitation Division(phone: 586-3258) prior to final site plan approval. All trash receptacles will be wheeled curb pickup containers. o Section 18.42.170 states that a permanent enclosure for temporary storage of garbage, refuse, and other solid waste shall be provided for every use, other than single- household dwellings, duplexes, individually owned townhouse or condominium units, unless other arrangements are made. A narrative detail as to the garbage receptacle arrangements shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. There will not be permanent trash receptacles on-site. All units will have rollaway curb containers. i o Section 18.42.170 requires a lighting plan for all on-site lighting, including wall- mounted lights on the building, must be included in the submittal for final approval. The only proposed on-site lighting is residential lighting. Residential lighting will consist of recessed can lighting on the patios and wall mounted shielded lantern lights (see enclosed for detail). Sheet C-3 shows existing street lighting within West Winds Subdivision. o Section 18.48.2140 defines open space as a land or water area devoid of buildings and other physical structures except where accessory to the provision of recreation, including but not limited to benches, picnic tables and interpretive signage. Section 18.34.090A.8.e states that a minimum of 150 square feet landscaped area per dwelling unit suitable for active recreational activities be provided on the site for residences. Section 18.50.020.A.1 explains that an additional .03 acres per dwelling unit of land dedication or cash in lieu of land dedication shall be provided for condominium developments. Each block has a minimum of 150 square feet of open .space per unit. These calculation and areas are defined on sheets OV-2 and IND-1 to IND-3. Section 18.50.020.A.1 Park Area Requirements have been accounted for in West Winds PUD (see chapters 2 and 6), 1.86 acres of park land have been set aside for these three approve multi family lots. o Section 18.44.010.E states that dead-end streets shall comply with City design specifications and standards, and with any City-adopted Uniform Fire Code. No dead- end streets longer than 150 feet shall be permitted without an approved turnaround. HAMS067120\Final site plan letter.doc 2 E N G I N E E R I N G 0 West Winds Condominiums• December 2006 Final Site Plan Submittal The southern most entrance to Block 3 lot 4 (phase]) has been eliminated from the design, so this street is now a dead end street. The street does abide to the Cities standards and fire code with the uses of a hammerhead turnaround. o Sections 18.48.050.C, 18.48050.E, and 18.78.100.0 states that the final landscape plan must meet all of the minimum landscape standards, fulfill the necessary points (23 points are required) and be signed and certified by a landscape professional. The location of"landscaped yards" and"parking lot landscaping" shall be specifically noted on the Landscaping Plan for Final Site Plan submittal. All landscaping is shown on sheet L-1, designed by a professional landscaper. o Section 18.52.060 states that a Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any on- site signage. The only proposed on-site signing are "No Parking"signs on the drive aisle. If the developer wants a sign at a later date he will fill out a Sign Permit Application and submit to the Planning Office. o Section 18.64.100 states that a building permit shall be obtained within one year of approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Prior to the lapse of one year, the applicant may seek an extension of one additional year from the Planning Director.Direction Noted o Section 18.64.110 states that no permit or license shall be issued unless the use, arrangement and construction has been set forth in such approved plans and applications. Comment Noted Engineering Provisions: r1) The Final Site Plan shall be adequately dimensioned. A complete legend of all line types used shall also be provided. Plans are dimensioned and a legend shown on sheet G-2. 2) A Storm Water Drainage/Treatment Grading Plan and Maintenance Plan for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan must demonstrate adequate site drainage (including sufficient spot elevations), storm water ' detention/retention basin details (including basin sizing and discharge calculations, and discharge structure details), storm water discharge destination, and a storm water maintenance plan. Please refer to the approved Stormwater Investigation for West Winds Planned Community Phase 1A &B Subdivision dated(12116104). Phase ]A &B of West Winds Subdivision stormwater system was designed with adequate capacity for these developed areas. Stormwater runoff from the proposed site will be conveyed to the existing stormwater system via the road network. 1 H:\04\S067120\Final site plan letter.doc 3 ENGINEERING 0 West Winds Condominiums• December 2006 Final Site Plan Submittal 3) Plans and specifications for any water, sewer and/or storm sewer main extensions, and Public or Private Streets (including curb, gutter& sidewalks)prepared by a Professional Engineer(PE) shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Water and sewer plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Specific comments regarding the existing and proposed infrastructure shall be provided at that time. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. No building permits will be issued prior to ' City acceptance of the infrastructure improvements.Drawings and specifications for sewer and water main extensions will be submitted to both the City and MDEQ for approval following Final Site Plan approval. No construction of sewer and water mains will take place prior to approvals and a pre-construction meeting. The developer will be required by both the city and DEQ to hire a Professional Engineer for inspection services. 4) Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from edge of easement. A 35'easement for the sewer and water mains has been established to provide a 10'between mains and the edge of the easements. 5) Sewer and water services shall be shown on the FSP and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman applications for service shall be completed by the applicant. Sewer and water services are shown on the final site plan, after the final site plan is approved it will be sent to COB Engineering Department for their approval before construction. 6) All trees must be at least 10 feet from any public utilities or service lines. Public utilities and services lines must be shown on the Final Landscaping plan.All trees are shown on the final Site plan being a minimum of 10'away from public service lines and utilities. ' 7) The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted, as well as nearby fire hydrants. Proposed main extensions shall be labeled "proposed". Noted on Plans. 8) The alleyway drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard alleyway approach (i.e., concrete apron, sidewalk section and drop-curb) and shown as such on the FSP. A City Curb Cut and Sidewalk Permit shall be obtained prior to FSP approval. Driveway approaches will be in accordance to ' COB Standard Drawing 02529-7A Boulevard Ally Approach Detail. H:\04\S067120\Final site plan letter.doc 4 E N G I N E E R I N G • M West Winds Condominiu December 2006 Final Site Plan Submittal 9) City standard sidewalk shall be installed and properly depicted at the standard location(i.e., 1 foot off property line) along the street(s) frontage. Any deviation ' to the standard alignment or location must be approved by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be installed and are shown to city standards. 10)Typical curb details (i.e., raised and/or drop curbs) and typical asphalt paving section detail shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Concrete curbing shall be provided around the entire new parking lot perimeter and adequately identified on the FSP. There is no curbing proposed on this site. The typical road section is provided on sheet D-1, and will be sent to COB Engineering after Final Site Plan approval. 11 The Montana Department of Fish Wildlife&Parks SCS Montana Department P p of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to FSP approval. Please refer to West Winds Subdivision PUD for all above letters. 12 All existing utility and other easements must be shown on FSP. Noted on Final Site Plans, also see Appendix F for coordination with Northwestern Energy. 13)The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineers office to provide addresses for all individual units in the development. Comment noted 14)Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the sight triangles, but on the subject property(unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off r the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's office). Snow storage is as noted on the Final Site Plan. In events where the designated areas are full snow will be removed from the site by contracted company. 15)Drive approach and public street intersection sight triangles shall be free of plantings, which at mature growth will obscure vision within the sight triangle. Sight triangles are clear of landscaping as shown on the landscape plan, L-1. 1 16)If construction activities related to the project result in the disturbance of more that 1 acre of natural ground, an erosion/sediment control plan may be required. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Bureau, shall be contacted by the Applicant to determine if a Storm Water Discharge Permit is necessary. If required by the WQB, an erosion/sediment control plan shall be prepared for disturbed areas of 1 acre or less if the point of discharge is less than 100'from State Waters. A contractor and construction date has not been determined for this proposed development. Once the above have been determined, the contractor will obtain need to obtain appropriates Stormwater Permits from Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Bureau. r H:\04\S067120\Final site plan letter.doc 5 E N G IN E E R I N G West Winds Condominium December 2006 Final Site Plan Submittal 17)Project phasing shall be clearly defined on the Final Site Plan and infrastructure plans and specifications including installation of infrastructure. Any proposed ' phasing of public infrastructure must be reviewed and approved by the City engineering office. The phasing of the project is shown on sheets 0V-1, IND-1 through IND-3. Phasing will begin with the southern most block (Block 3, Lot 4) and continue build out to the north. 18)The southern most alley access on Tempest Court does not meet the minimum spacing requirements for drive accesses and intersections. Tempest Court makes a 90-degree turn, which by code is considered an intersection. Any drive accesses must be a minimum of 40-feet from any intersection, or otherwise approved at the discretion of the City Engineer(See UDO section 18.44.090.H for further information about the Deviations from Property Access Standards.) This access to the development has been eliminated from the design. Eliminating the access made a dead-end road. The dead-end road does meet city and fire standards as a hammerhead turnaround. M19)The applicant shall submit a construction route map dictating how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site in accordance with section 18.74.020.A.I of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall be submitted as part of the final site plan for site developments, or with the infrastructure plans for subdivisions. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the construction traffic follows the approved routes. A map showing the construction route to the sites is enclosed. 20)All construction activities shall comply with section 18.74.020.A.2. of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. Comment Noted RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based on the following analysis, Planning Staff, and the Development Review Committee (DRC), find that the application, with conditions, is in general compliance with the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The following conditions of approval are recommended: 1. Drive accesses, as measured from the curb cut, may not be located closer than 5 feet to any side property line. A shared drive access with the adjoining property owner may be utilized, as approved by the City Engineer. The driveway on the southeast end off of Tempest Court has been eliminated. This Block meets the HAMS067120\Final site plan letter.doc 6E N G IN E E R ING West Winds Condominiums• December 2006 Final Site Plan Submittal City's requirements for dead end streets as the southern most street in block 3 acts a hammerhead. 2. Drive aisle width shall be a minimum of 26 feet. Signage indicating"No Parking" shall be installed along each drive aisle. The location of these signs shall be accurately depicted on the Final Site Plan. The driveway aisle has been increased to 26. ' "No Parking"signs have been proposed on each side of the aisle accurately shown on sheet C-3 of the construction drawings. 3. Porches covered terraces and covered decks occupy no m that occ t re than one-third 0 of the length of the building wall may encroach not more than 5 feet into the required front yard. Proposed decks do not encroaching more than five (5)feet on the setbacks. 4. Per UDO Section 18.34.090.A.8 150 square feet of open space per unit must be provided. Open space must provide recreational area suitably located and accessible to the residential units it is intended to serve, and,must be adequately tscreened to ensure privacy and quiet for neighboring residences. The required 150 square feet of open space per unit has been meet on the final site plan. See sheet I7VD-1 through IND-3 for an accurate depiction of proposed open space and calculations for each block. 5. A greater diversity of species for the boulevard plantings shall be provided. Applicant shall obtain the necessary boulevard tree permits from the Forestry Division. Ryan Stover, at the City of Bozeman Forestry Department, shall be contacted with questions. Comment noted 6. Additional plantings shall be incorporated into the proposed open space areas. These plantings shall aid in screening these areas from adjacent residences and RAV. These plantings shall be accurately depicted on the landscaping plan for Final Site Plan submittal. The utility landscape screening is shown on the landscape plan sheet L-1 7. A phasing plan shall be submitted for review prior to Final Site Plan approval. All infrastructure shall be installed prior to occupancy of any buildings. Phasing of the development can bee seen on sheet OV-1. The development will start with the southern most block, block 3, Lot 4 and continue to the north. Phasing is shown on sheets 0V--2 and IND-1 through IND-3. 8. All mechanical equipment shall be screened in accordance with UDO Section 18.38.050. This shall include, but not limited too, air conditioners and electric panels. All mechanical equipment and screening shall be depicted on the landscaping plan for Final Site Plan submittal. All mechanical equipment will be located between the buildings and screen with landscaping. H:\04\S067120\Final site plan letter.doc 7 E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Condominium December 2006 0 Final Site Plan Submittal 9. Covenants shall be drafted and provided to the Planning Office for review. The approved covenants shall be recorded with the Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. The covenants shall include reference to sidewalk, landscaping, storm water pond, open space and parking maintenance. The proposed development is within West Winds Subdivision and will abide to its covenants. Enclosed is a copy of the Declaration of Covenants for West Wind Condominiums for the Planning Department approval and will be filed with the Clerk and Recorders Office. 10. A mutual access easement for each drive aisle shall be filed with the Clerk and Recorders Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. Evidence of this shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. A copy of the mutual access easement is enclosed. 11. A 30' public access and utility easement shall be provided along the proposed drive aisle. This easement shall be accurately depicted on all plans for Final Site Plan submittal. The 35'public access and utility easement is shown on the Final Site Plan. The 35'easement has been proposed so no utility is nearer than 10'to the edge of the easement. 1 12. All utilities lines and easements shall be shown on both the Landscaping _ and Site Plan for Final Site Plan submittal. Proposed extensions shall be labeled"proposed."Shown on Final Site Plan, also see Appendix F for tcoordination with Northwestern Energy on power and gas services. 13. Per UDO landscaping requirements, a minimum of 23 points shall be provided. The breakdown of how points were obtained shall be clearly depicted on the landscaping plan for Final Site Plan submittal. Breakdown of landscape points are shown on the Landscape Plan, L-1, in accordance to UDO Section 18.48.060. 14. The location of signage shall be accurately depicted on the Final Site Plan. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any on-site signage. The only proposed signs on-site are "No Parking"sign depicted on sheet C-3. If the developer decides that additional signs are need in the future all propped sign will be submitted to the planning office with a sign permit application. ' 15. Lighting detail shall be provided for all exterior lighting. The location of parking lot and/or wall-mounted lighting shall be accurately depicted on the Final Site Plan submittal materials. The only proposed on-site lighting is residential lighting. Residential lighting will consist of recessed can lighting on the patios and wall-mounted shielded lantern lighting in the driveways (see enclosed for typical detail). Existing street lighting is shown on sheet C-3 of the Final Site Plans. H:\04\S067120\Final site plan letter.doc 8 E N mic E R I N G West Winds Condominiums• December 2006 Final Site Plan Submittal If you have an questions or need additional information lease do not hesitate to call our Y any p office. Sincerely, Y P Paul Yakawich, E.I. Enclosure CC: Ridge Investments LLC Cascade Development LLC File r r �c r . H:\04\S067120\Final site plan letter.doc 9 E N GIN E E R I N G West Winds Subdivision Condominiums January 2007 Final Site Plan Table of Contents Appendix A-------Final Site Plan Application Appendix B -------Covenants Appendix C -------Lighting Cut Sheet rAppendix D------- Construction Route Appendix E-------Easement Agreement rAppendix F-----Miscellaneous Letters AM r r r r r r H:\04\S067120\cover_toc_doc P I N E E R I N GAM M ! ! West Winds Subdivision Condominiums January 2007 Final Site Plan FINAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAOCS0671201CAVef_tOc Am PIN I N E E R I N G 9 • CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net FINAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION I.Name of Project/Development: West Winds Condominiums 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Ridge Investment LLC E-mail Address: Mailing Address: PO Box 11077,Bozeman MT 59719 Phone: 406-581-7572 FAX: 3.Applicant Information: Name: Same as above E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: F.Legal Description: NW 1/4,Section2,T2S,R5E-Block 3 Lot 4;Block 4 Lot 1;Block 7 Lot 1 F5. Street Address: 1428,1546,and 1652 Termpest Court 6.Project Type: 0 Site Plan ❑ Site Plan/COA ❑CUP ❑CUP/COA ❑PUD ❑ Other: 7.Project Description: A development within West Wind Subdivision Phase 1 of 69 condominium units 8.For condominiums: Is a digital copy of the layout attached? ✓ Yes No Certification of Completion and Compliance—I understand the conditions of approval and the submitted final site plan or master site plan have complied with any conditions of approval or corrections to comply with code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Site Plan— I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final site plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: ! Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: (Final Site Plan Application—Prepared 12/10/03;revised 01/05/05) J :�f. '•q'`'�',-'�j�_ �; acT��'Y.z�-^�f• ..a; •��..'5.;:'�N•3.- � ,:f ^1�;�^ >•- 1`7 �r*..s.fl fi � rq.-� y ,`d!.7r.�.« •,,1 ',iu�� 'T * �"R#, pvK'�..}� 4x�,.�.�"Lµ�r'x`C*G -,y tt• 3, ' � �Mr.�`er. tb ".: '.5:- y-x^�` g ` � k' ma� f 3Y a�+{S _..,#•�"r.-.:p r. gs .;r. 4 .••r 'S .,Tlp,,.,.,r v°f' t' °�°•�;ht � FARG a s ✓ �. ,.. .fi,,,,` ?r ��y � AY.. h t 'C. h L^5: �L`l. ' eC R.dr•.Zx. 3�•:" Y3,:y f R. 'C Gwv:P s . 1 43�. 4< y> m :ir'1b:• 9n7 raWELLSFAHGO}BANIC'.MONT "`a �Sa:i 17 s�<,1<2(�Qr E ti ANA N A - J°CJ✓6 h"^' x , t ?x�-`: e ;'i ' 9 ji xT i s 'ASCAD #s ;x_ �:n:b ziayw Maln;Stree t '�,_ ' E#HOMESINCz' t 4 1, :' p :r R , x .:, a tkt y.s' .. .>, >•» ,a. 110 ai'^ c f.' -;�.t3;•�.•' a Bozeman MT-59715'°' �� � ,�'�!� r ,w..•<<=?-, ��t` c 1637iMA,I�N S E7'` #223_ey, .y ' `'' .�[i. av-.r ,y �`n _�Rs fW �r .�.•tR ? C " ` A < A' cz t r g �9„ r i iA" Y�a.` T4 yy f, 3=527 29'e' v: wtYa Via.. �� '• :iu x`{ d` r -' .<3.1x`'i+,�ek *` _ af .a ..sm ratf+ y, �z^ +�.,;.d�^d. ,<.+�. F5'. t .-.,�re;,. •3"r- {k' P F f' �.w •1:>+ a •.l.l"'Y%r��y^ �ej*'�;c3{.; N•ir ` y, y�''c,�pth. oy'•ra. sue,,t. a a,,a t �-r3, � I 's y � x, . . � �,✓aYh`. ^',,. r .i n..'Tv" +1'�' t `x } r.A 2' N.,h'-,'�Z,' cy� "'r�• ',��. M1 f q •Y .;PTO THE sv k. �z.. F � .7u y� �fF r v Crt(;.of Bozgman �r� E s t�� a K ,;fit s_. a � � .,. q ORDER:OF. " . °0iM -, �'; g y, k+t,►Mr*+rrr* s r LJ n+' :o : t aN('SC �S <y R• �r"�93;+'Y'a �s ?, `�`,�3°6a2 Q. .r.4 iA�y'" ;irfj;,•, 50�.,00�5•``E�F '�r x r 6 r :t •« e C v'�k Y 4 a � 5r L Z x Wi t cn r ll��7k, ss � s ,. `u. �a ttu °'�vz- �``.lf ' a^ � ..* 'e✓$r,' Arm �r�*w�Zc... s.�TsA. X.,,x' � „�x"'tr,A' . -y�x :EX4CTLhYa'FNFHUNDRED DOLLARS s. �a. `.`� r aphs � a :a 't � i• �aa i K?'E,tah".f'" w� 'a. v ,3�, ''Vj; "'AV x �#`3. r'�..i CM:?E•.i 3 '..r,a.a�. #tNO {'�. r,';.: '`�'4�,.�'y§, s7,�`,`..x Z hxr,,�•. �- •y eP'✓" s`C. c .;' `1. et" ,«a'.i; -.tom ,µ�r a •'Lr ti` .-b s r, 1 "t�'.'�+Y`'e#< � �' ,1''. 's si #. `s r 'rFM a3 ? , 1 � �N ` �� , z r € yaa. .x DOLLf1RSt ' A ' Ci xof$BoZe �s t � 1 a (� r✓fi"rzs "f Wit:a� #C73 `e v s �,. .K„ E �A manrx `{ F p :sr 'PTA. ` <( _ - t 14..+`S '. t �.. y'SV" t *� �. �a' ire PO,B.ox�123A� ' > f �• _ Tr 3F. p dt z 3 ;° ai •s'�S"t»C 1S "�,.' F'# ray, r{• r" ry t k�b.°t' "a,� - ;`vim` i i? .:. '.`;;,t�Y'Jy'� „r rH if( '�.. .si ,1§r Jy' c'»�.,r :�,°.�'3, " :,•m ,trc > '� .Y r, '3'"''G<„t•°Y ' P_.�,,.;4 a 4r ,r. wa'Y r r Bozeman MT�59.T71=1=230`a', �6� r `�} � :g <'<�.' Y ��' ,s�, T. _ ��t �• �.Y 'r:KS '..'�4 ! w - iZ. i ra+yy�i ::f'.';-ro�" _�ii�9 .''f`i.;ZiJyza•�c?�'a.p .4b,,�tr, Y.�tSpr.-,i ,# ..w � C• .' •°s�rf,>r .:u...4 �< .cy- "Y�"• .•t',(- :ys'd � y"',yt�+• `•j�,., L"�� +'fir. y ..2r.. n+sr afix•.;.yr. `i x ;^ L+wrs�•Yis + ,.;• A r6�' "� "`s 2 ..f• r c�s '' t_ ; •" " r °: R�".+�a. > K V pY9 'r''`,;a. 1 Q y ^.final�pl•at {�• �;'��� � 1t� -.:� � � .,,,� s��-£� t'•3 'w. .'>*"' f� �`#&s Z ��� """ '� a � g hP �{''�`s � e�`I. -s�"st��2 y,� »f�a`� -?� ? si= fir„ s F z �- �+� '� .y ,t���r '� • •. a �... ,� �rN �o c.J�;,i 'X�-.'i�iR�x�i;�:4:'.�� �x�: Y.. rS��� .r xt�s aa.�.��;�t S"�} �-,y�,'r i �b xa��3-,'Y['f�."`i '�� 5 ��'�,n 1 �i'4' fp� .�%��SEi :••# ,.�?iw., :.4;..::.�'t�.'Ly� tA�'�mc}`^�si.�c��.'S tin'F`.'shl•u��l+'3'��< '73^ '�, � s�"?f:,.S, ,,�•� 'S` � A''rr•a?iL"r r f,: •r n�, ';'"���r 1180129891l •��:09 290 5 2 781:09255093Saul CASCADE HOMES,INC. Bozeman,MT 59715 12989 Record#, 317 Ch'eck#: . 1298,9' Date 01F1'6/2007 Descrnptwn': .. final,plat `: Vendor# Payee City, UBozeman ndaress �Po Box 1230 �Bozem w l 59771 1230 t "yl` i'�-7 '`nJ<,.'�j y ' gnu ' y,3 y1 k<.1 �y7r.S'{✓yi_ ., a �L V,y? I ' Y 1 , "'1"` 1 r r: �• x r e .� \t� yaf� ca`z=>1 .w3y .n _J,. s 'i•-X., J S; c- f#v'f-. 'Y' �••1" � �"�{F7 ';•.'.7.' b "',4'-1) J/Y r ��ry "�, xlr,vti g� ^:sue•-7"i t, `� 2�,�y, # s:k% 7'p:5at, ' r ., ,;t, ° .rc%.al :r<d• r.:,=ri•. > 'S .=C,=7h, a.x F'+. 'sS. ^z. ,iY•.•;•g.'s-�:'. R: .;r,S'�;< s ,;.s �."a `�x' •.r ';.,ra r• » s..�. a` ,.�_ 1p:: 1.�F:;n:ah��v E.gytvj.c �k Lra" EA,}i� r c�_ x:e: ,.rL: f�'.�r,'�'^' .,•�YP:x :z: �?+��,�:. .c�«.:�.. ,�, t h..<...,y�,4✓..yy;,..�, ,� m ..c'�- a7:m ;,, �Fi '' ":Y't.a. �?+... x.., k}r�a{' •F`.F...�: ''�; -t. • ;. is"< :>v:k'4^"' '� «•�. ;," i��' •:� �°="2,:fvT l�'�s' �!,e�:. -`�-,�c'b.::r�:�-`''u.xr,r e..�V:,:.i:�'?��`' ��`'•'�.. +'fi;�:;,.e'�•,s;.:�''x7' .;r n ,�, i ::c,•L'r'. -;?a': .h,° �+ �•�.,. s .Ff1. �c;'2',,:w �r+:s .� a„ � ;'�u.:�`" tii.....;•r,�"'�� +�6:cti' i�'„�". :s.t�,,.2 ..pet. �• ��"`• � =d�F�n.� �s' 't'�. ,�_,�f .*'ru �r � F �• �a x 2 s :�S ^��i $s'-,3. ;'�ft�.,ry+k�''"�: 'S2�S•" .r,�' u'".�• ���-Yrt.:�•�'^,;}2,w.`.� .�t�?• =r,.#�.t '..�f ;?�'a:i d>7:•-_.s r^t,�.'�f'.:s�?.;'�•�< .u? •:,ram;, v.`�'v ,�:^'.� ;;:�"».x......t�,?.,,,4 i „�'.rax•' .'T�'. "`'6xJ':.^i.,":W. �T,r .'`+�'' r.•�(.,..4*R� ✓'+sn b � �91' 1� :.°)C �"I? •C2 �,:t5%,.:' .."k Ley, �@��s p <t'f .� � �! re �'t}'.;'-' ti, a«rt �,� '�i'-''•`wr'.i, ~ •:r'2Ytwt:g e .�+ e�."`�t '�, ..•.�u .��':. .{!:. ;GN:t�3'`-�t:+?��, i.. �'"�a'"�q t•^z r e>,�.,,..;� gar i�,. .Y*s;:=,-fix ae.'�::�t.nr'�F' �i. -�L e I �4,. .�. + �{� �� .�iy:,�,Crr�;'�+q�� ,�.� ssx-�;� ��?'.,�, „��y�,,._�. '' :,T. .r,�¢•;+�:�a.v�< ..r,�X�,s� d,r ,�.�s�z `'"���T�`'�...�tr�' {.� � v :la 'X T������F""�� �",,r�. ���.- x w11.- '� #''1s }� .,.. '...c:. �`r - ` b e.�y�,��' -lc�.� r•. 1 •.Pr� .,rya ?"�a, v ?'y', ��� ,��;°'t1� �'�:`r^ �35r � '€•�,'.5;;- �� ,��r��„n x�'_d 'Xr�'���.i? ��:ar ��",.-i°a�{,��' -��� r- �^.'s.. . �;��°` ,ctck,`�'_.. �'�t- �;k ;,C> 4i3 '"'�� ,r a � ,pr n. A6+• �.:< % y� w<r4+C's��,ar `'S '-&' �� ���, �S< F��'f-;.L� , I e r 0 West Winds Subdivision Condominiums January 2007 Final Site Plan r r r r COVENANTS r r �r r r T H:\04\S0671201Cover_toc_doc E N G*!E E R I N G DECLARATION OF COVENANTS FOR WEST WINDS CONDOMINIUMS !j This Declaration is made this 26th day of June, 2006, by Ridge Investments, L.L.C., of P.O. Box 11077 Bozeman Montana 59719,hereinafter referred to as"Declarant." ' RECITALS 1. That the Declarant is the owner in fee simple of that real property described as follows: Lot 4 Block 3, Lot 1 Block 4, Lot 1 Block 7 of West Winds Subdivision Phase 1, Gallatin County, Montana 2. That the Declarant desires to erect Condominium clusters upon the property described above, which shall be subject to the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for West Winds Major Subdivision,as well as this Declaration. NOW THEREFORE, the Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, declare, publish and impose upon the premises, the following covenants, conditions and restrictions, which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit and value of all persons claiming under them, their successors, and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, architectural design, use and development of the premises. These covenants, conditions and restrictions shall apply to the entire premises and all improvements placed or erected thereon, unless the context of these covenants, conditions and restrictions implies otherwise, and shall be in existence and full force and effect for as long as condominiums upon the above described property, or until such time as these covenants are modified by agreement of all of the owners of the property affected hereby. The covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be as follows: 1. That the property described in this Declaration is a part of the West Winds' Subdivision and shall be subject to the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for West Winds Subdivision, recorded as Document No. 2202936,records of Gallatin County, Montana. As such, each owner of a Condominium upon the above-described property shall automatically become a member of the West Winds Owners' Association and shall be subject to the Bylaws of that organization. He or she shall also be obligated to pay those assessments levied by the Association. 2. That in addition, the Declarant shall form a separate Owners' Association for the West Winds Condominiums, in order to provide a mechanism for maintenance of the condominiums and their surroundings. In that regard the Association created to manage the affairs of the condominium cluster shall be authorized to levy assessments upon the owners of the ' 0 condominiums in order to pay for snow removal upon the sidewalks, lawn care for front yards and the maintenance of the buildings. The West Winds Condominium Association shall maintain the roofs and siding of the buildings, but the individual owners shall be responsible for ' replacement and repair of windows and doors and any additions that may be made to the buildings, such as satellite dishes. The Association shall be organized in the same manner as the West Winds Owners' Association and shall have the same powers to levy assessments and place liens upon the condominiums as the West Winds Owners' Association, but shall be subordinate to the West Winds Owners' Association with respect to any powers and duties set forth in the Declaration recorded as Document No. 2202936, records of Gallatin County, Montana. ' Specifically, the power to levy assessments shall be as follows: a. The Declarant, for each unit owned within the subdivision, hereby covenants, ' and each owner of any unit by acceptance of a deed therefore, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association all annual assessments or charges, or special assessments for capital improvements, such assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments, together with interest, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees, shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each assessment is made. Each assessment, together with interest, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees, shall be the personal obligation of the person who is the owner of such property at the time such assessment becomes due. b. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively for the purposes set forth above. c. The amount of the annual assessments shall be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Association and no annual assessments shall be made until the election to do so is made by the Board of Directors. The maximum assessment per unit which may be made by the Association in every calendar year shall not substantially exceed the actual and reasonable cost incurred by the Association in carrying out the purposes herein set forth. d. In addition to the annual assessments authorized above, the Association may levy, in any assessment year, a special assessment applicable to that year only for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement of capital improvements on the property, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, provided that any such assessment shall have the assent of sixty-six and two thirds percent (66 2/3%) or more of all of the votes of membership who are present in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for that purpose. ' • 0 e. Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under these covenants shall be sent to all members not less than ten (10)days nor more than forty (40) days in advance of the meeting. At the first ' such meeting called for a particular purpose, the presence of members or proxies entitled to cast fifty percent (50%) of all the votes of members shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called ' subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meeting shall be forty percent (40%) of the membership. No such subsequent meeting shall be held more than sixty(60)days following the originally scheduled tmeeting. f. Both annual and special assessments for the members must be fixed on a per unit basis, unless another basis shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Association, utilizing objective criteria to establish the alternate basis. The Board may set different assessments for improved and unimproved units, provided that all units within a class are assessed uniformly. g. Except as herein provided, the annual and special assessments shall commence as to all units on the date determined by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall fix the amount of the annual assessments against each unit at least thirty (30) days in advance of the due date of each annual assessment and ninety (90) days in advance of a special assessment. Written notice of the annual tassessments shall be sent to each owner or member subject thereto. The due date of the annual assessments shall be established by the Board of Directors. h. Any assessment not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date shall bear interest from the past due date at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum, which is the maximum amount allowed by §31-1-107, MCA, at the time of ' creation of this Declaration. In the event that the maximum amount allowed by §31-1-107, MCA should be raised or lowered by the legislature, the maximum amount that may be charged on past due assessments shall be raised or lowered ' accordingly. Any past due assessment on any unit may be recorded at the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana and, from the date of recording, shall be notice of the lien of the assessment to all third parties. The ' Association may bring an action at law against the owners personally obligated to pay the same or foreclose the lien against the property. No owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by nonuse or ' abandonment of the unit. i. No sale, transfer or encumbrance of any unit shall affect.the personal liability of the owner, or the assessment lien if recorded in the records of Gallatin County, except to the extent extinguished by Montana law pertaining to liens, mortgages 0 ' and trust indentures. No sale or transfer to a third party with actual or constructive knowledge of an assessment shall relieve such unit from the liability for any outstanding assessments or from any assessments thereafter becoming due or from the recorded lien thereof. 3. That the Declarant is the owner of the property described above and intends to erect condominiums upon the property. Party walls and the foundations for party walls shall be placed between the units located on the property and the units, while separately owned, shall share common exteriors,which will be governed by these covenants. 4. Each unit owner, during his or her ownership of one of the condominium units that are the subject of this Declaration, shall enjoy the right, privilege or easement to use the party wall(s) and foundation(s) of his or her unit(s) for as long as the same remain standing, subject to the provisions of this Declaration. ' 5. Should the buildings on the properties described above be so constructed that the foundation or party walls for any of the condominiums extends over the boundary of the unit for that condominium and onto the unit of an adjoining condominium, the foundation and party wall ' of such condominium so extended shall remain as situated and shall be construed and deemed to be a party wall between such properties, so that in the event an encroachment exists, neither party shall be compelled to take down or remove such party wall, for so long as the same shall remain standing. Such encroachment shall be deemed permissive, with no adverse or prescriptive rights created on the property which shall suffer the encroachment. Furthermore, other applicable easements are shown on the plat for Lot 4 Block 3, Lot 1 Block 4,Lot 1 Block 7 and shall apply to the owners as their interests appear. 6. This Declaration shall continue in effect from and after the date of the execution of this Declaration and for so long as the foundations and party walls, or any of them, shall stand and shall constitute an easement and covenant of record running with the land, for the mutual use and benefit of each condominium affected by this Agreement. 7. No owner shall engage in any construction, repair, remodeling or replacement which in any way affects the structural integrity or bearing capacity of a party wall, without the consent of the owner(s) of the contiguous building located on the adjoining unit. No owner may engage ' in any construction, remodeling or replacement of the exterior of his or her building without the consent of the Architectural Committee. ' 8. Each wall which is built as a part of the original construction of the building upon the properties and placed on the dividing line between the units shall constitute a party wall, and, to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the general rules of law regarding party walls and liability for property damage due to negligence or willful acts or omissions shall apply. 9. The cost of reasonable repair and maintenance of a party wall shall be equally shared by the owners who make use of the wall in proportion to such use. 10. That portion of the exterior of each of the buildings which constitutes the party wall ' shall be maintained in its original condition, unless all of the owners of the properties affected by this Agreement unanimously agree otherwise. 1 11. Each owner of any building affected by this Agreement shall be responsible for the care and maintenance of his or her individual building or buildings located upon such unit, including doors, windows, siding roofing, etc., pertaining to that portion of the building located on his or her unit, and the adjoining patio(s). All repairs and maintenance shall be effected in such a manner that the portion of the building on the adjoining unit shall not be adversely affected. In that regard, all maintenance and repairs shall be carved out in a manner that will restore the building as close as possible to its original condition, including colors. All replacement parts shall be exact duplicates of the original parts, if possible, unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Committee. The Association shall provide for maintenance of the ' lawns and landscaping features within the condominiums and each owner shall be assessed for his or her pro-rata share of such expenses, including the cost of operating and maintaining the sprinkler system for the complex. ' 12. Fences of any kind shall be prohibited, other than privacy screening around individual patios, which shall be no more than 4 feet in height. This provision may only be modified upon an affirmative vote of all of the owners in West Winds Condominiums and the City of Bozeman, regardless of any other provision setting forth a lesser percentage for other matters. Other than patio areas allowed to be enclosed with privacy fences, all other exterior areas within the property described above shall be maintained as open areas for the benefit of all of the owners. Reciprocal easements are hereby established for all open areas for the benefit of all other owners and the Association, allowing for the use of all open areas for the purposes of traversing properties, maintenance, recreation, and all other uses of the property that do no constitute an abuse of the property or a nuisance to the owner of such property. In the event that any owner, or the owner's guests or invitees abuse the privilege, or conduct activities upon the property of another in a manner that such activities are abusive or constitute a nuisance, the aggrieved party, or the Association, may seek appropriate relief from the judicial system to prohibit the conduct of such activities, or to enjoin the offending party from utilizing the property of that owner. 13. Exterior storage of personal property shall be prohibited, except that owners may store barbeque grills, picnic tables and lawn chairs upon their patios. No other goods may be stored outside, regardless of whether the same is stored upon a patio. 14. If a party wall is destroyed or damaged by fire or other casualty, any owner who has used the wall may restore it, and if the other owners thereafter make use of the wall, they shall contribute to the cost of restoration thereof in proportion to such use. Such restoration shall be without prejudice, however, to the right of any such owners to call for a larger contribution from ' the others under any rule of law regarding liability for negligent or willful acts or omissions. 15. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, an owner who, by his or her negligent or willful act, causes the party wall to be exposed to the elements shall bear the ' whole cost of furnishing the necessary protection against such elements. 16. The rights of an owner to be established under this Agreement shall be appurtenant ' to the land and shall pass to such owner's successors in title. 17. Modification of this Declaration shall be in the same manner as modification of the West Winds Declaration and shall be subject to the same limitation that no modification of a condition of subdivision approval may take place without the approval of the Bozeman City Commission. ' 18. In the event of any dispute concerning a party wall, or any other provisions of this Agreement, the Board of Directors of the West Winds Condominiums shall conduct a hearing and render a decision, which shall be binding upon the parties except upon a clear and convincing showing of error. In conducting the hearing, the Board may retain the services of an attorney to preside at such hearing and to advise the Board as to issues of law. In such case, the parties to the dispute shall be assessed the fees for such attorney, as the Board deems appropriate. ' In determining whether to assess fees, the Board shall apply the same standards as those employed by the court system in awarding fees to a successful litigant. In the event that the Board declines to become involved in any controversy arising under this Declaration, a party may seek the appropriate relief in the courts of Gallatin County, Montana and the successful litigant shall be entitled to recover his or her reasonable court costs and attorney fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has executed this instrument the day and year ' first above written. ' RIDGE INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. ' ROBERT DAVIDSON Managing Member of Ridge Investments, L.L.C. 1 i 1 STATE OF MONTANA ) ' :ss County of Gallatin ) 1 This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of June, 2006, ' Robert Davidson, Managing Member of Ridge Investments, L.L.C. 1 Notary Public for the State of Montana ' Printed Name Residing at ,Montana My Commission expires 120_ 1 1 r 1 1 1 r r r r r ' West Winds Subdivision Condominiums January 2007 Final Site Plan LIGHTING CUT SHEET t 1 ' HAMS06712ftovef toG_ m E N G I N E E R I N G Thomas Lighting :: Details • Page 1 of 1 Tt OMASLIG ITIF`tG.COM - — -- 0close i 4 r E i 1 � t r I M 3` Collection/Family: Description: Brentwood One-light, Matte Black finish outdoor wall bracket with clear be- glass panels. Catalog Number: SL9242-7 Suggested Retail Price: $72.00 ADDITIONAL PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS: UPC Number 020389144645 Width 7" ' Body Height 13 1/4" Overall Length No.Lights 1 Max Watt 100w Extends 6 3/4" HCO` 41/2" http://www.thomaslighting.com/catalog/proddetall pn*nt.asp.cno=SL9242-7 11/21/2006 ' Thomas Lighting :: Details Page 1 of 1 ' T �/l � l.�h� t '�, �Yi close t-1 9 i � Collection/Family: Description: Dark Sky Ordinance. Dark Skies sleeve. Directs all light down. ' Requirements for 100% light cut off. Use with SL9242 or any fi.catalog Number:DS 1.00-4 designed for single lamp base up applications. Suggested Retail Price: ' $23.40 ADDITIONAL PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS: UPC Number 020389161161 ' Width 31/8" -Body Height 51/2" Overall Length No.Lights 1 Max Watt 50w R 20 lamp Extends HCO' http://www.thomaslighting.com/catalog/proddetail pn*nt.asp.cno DS100-4 11/21/2006 West Winds Subdivision Condominiums January 2007 Final Site Plan CONSTRUCTION ROUTE 1 1 ' HAWS067120\cover_toc_doc E N G I N E E R I N G 1 Q _ LRO t t r. 4: CONDO �'s tpYAI{ SST" 1 GA1,LA MTRLOW At.�ou _j iwlmiEER DR; Ii+iAPLB _ 10 'S' ' — n Al a �' \ 1flLD {?Ty 4LN `'ZZ !� . d E 1 -- �1 t 3t'fNs Sf a -- �� g — ` ial LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY CONS TRl1CT/ON A, NW 1/4 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.S.E., P.M.M. 1 r ENC3INEERIN ROUTE •GALLTIN COUNTY, MONTANA -N- HKM Englneedng Inc. McChesney Professional Bldg. CORNS TRUC TION ROUTE 601 Nildes Dr.,Suite 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 H (406(586MU aoo o aoo soo ATTACHMENT C FAX(406(586-1730 Scale feet DATE JUL"2005 PROJECT N0.04SOti7d'] �6 copyright 2005 HKM Engineering Inc,All Rights Reeen�ed West Winds Subdivisi•Condominiums • January 2007 Final Site Plan 1 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 1 t 1 ' HAWS067120\cover_toc_doc E N G I N E E R I N G A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT Ridge Investment LLC; PO Box 11077, Bozeman MT 59719, GRANTOR(S), in consideration ' of$ 1.00 and for other and valuable considerations, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to The City of Bozeman, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Montana,with offices at ' 411 East Main, Bozeman, Montana 59715, GRANTEE, a public access easement for a driveway and parking area for the use of the public in, through, and across a 35 feet wide strip of land situated in Gallatin County,Montana, which is located on the following described property: ' NW 1/4, Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East P.M.M. West Winds Subdivision Phase 1a& lb Block 3,Lot 4 (1428 Tempest Court) Commencing at a point that is the Northeast comer of Block 3, Lot 4 of West Winds Major ' Subdivision Phase lA and the South Right-of-Way of Cobblestone Place at the intersection of the West Right-of-Way of North 27`h Avenue, Thence North 88°12'21"West, 85.03 feet, along the South Right-of-Way of Cobblestone Place to the Point of Beginning(P.O.B.). Thence, South 01°47'39" West, 235.59 feet; Thence, South 89°57'41"East, 73.05 feet, to a point on the West side of an existing utility easement; Thence, South 01°47'38" West, 35.02 feet, along existing utility easement; Thence,North 89058'37"West, 201.64 feet; ' Thence,North 00°00'00" East, 24.45 feet, to a point on the South side of an existing utility easement; Thence,North 89°42'52"East, 26.32 feet, along existing utility easement; tThence,North 01°47'39" East, 10.42 feet, along existing utility easement; Thence, South 89°59'45" East, 68.03 feet; Thence, North 01°47'39"East, 236.66 feet, to a point on the South Right-of-Way of Cobblestone Place; Thence, South 88°12'21" East, 35.00 feet, along the South Right-of-Way of Cobblestone Place ' to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.346 acres. Block 4,Lot 1 (1546 Tempest Court) ' Commencing at a point that is the Northeast corner of Block 4, Lot 1 of West Winds Major Subdivision Phase lA and the South Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane at the intersection of the West Right-of-Way of North 27th Avenue, Thence North 88°12'21"West, 85.00 feet, along the South-Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane to the Point of Beginning(V.O.B.). Thence, South 01°47'39"West, 359.15 feet, to a point on the North Right-of-Way of Cobblestone Place; Thence,North 88°12'21" West, 35.00 feet, along the North Right-of-Way of Cobblestone Place; Thence,North 01°47'39" East, 359.15 feet, to a point on the South Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane; Thence, South 88°12'21" East, 35.00 feet, along the South Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.289 acres. Block 7,Lot 1 (1652 Tempest Court) Commencing at a point that is the Southeast corner of Block 7, Lot 1 of West Winds Major Subdivision Phase 1B and the North Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane at the intersection of the West Right-of-Way of North 27`h Avenue,Thence North 88012'21" West, 85.06 feet, along the North Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane to the Point of Beginning (P.O.B.). ' Thence,North 01°47'39" East, 247.21 feet; Thence,North 90°00'00" East, 73.11 feet, to a point on the West side of an existing utility easement; ' Thence,North 01047'54" East, 35.02 feet, along existing utility easement; Thence, North 90°00'00" West, 188.17 feet, to a point on the East Right-of-Way of Tempest Court; Thence, South 01047'39" West,35.02 feet, along the East Right-of-Way of Tempest Court; Thence,North 90°00'00" East, 80.04 feet; Thence, South 01047'39" West,246.11 feet, to a point on the North Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane; Thence, South 88012'21"East, 35.00 feet, along the North Right-of-Way of Breeze Lane to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.349 acres. The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A which by this reference is ' made a part hereof. ' The GRANTOR(S) agrees: t (1) To construct and maintain the driveway and parking area at their own expense in accordance with relevant City Ordinances, including,but not limited to, snow removal ' and all major and minor repair work. (2) To allow the City to make any and all inspections of the driveway and parking area and land appurtenant thereto as the City reasonably deems necessary. ' The GRANTOR(S)warrant that they are lawfullyseized and possessed of the real ' property described above, that they have a lawful right to convey the property, or any part of it, and that they will forever defend the title to this property against the claims of all persons. The GRANTOR(S) further agrees that the GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and privileges herein granted without any interruption by the GRANTORS. The terms, covenants and provisions of this easement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, ' executors, administrators,personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. DATED this IT day of 30'uaff q, 20.E _ • _•, ;� � Grantor-Ridge Investment LLC ):ss County o Gallatin ) 1 ' On this_W7day of GVvwvv�.� 20 ,before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, per nallytv., peared 6 ��,t,;[��sl'� , known to M me to be ey)ctl a-e of C. Vand the person whose name is subscribed to ' the within instrument and acknowledged P6 me that he executed the within instrument for and on behalf of —41g kA rIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and Yv �in3liove written. \\X ���,1N L I NQ 1 NOTARY N�. LPL ... NQrary Public for the State of Montana ' (Printed Name Residing at My Commission expires /�/20J_L r 7 iACCEPTED: ' CITY OF BOZEMAN by . City Manager 1 ATTEST: 1 City Clerk ' STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. ' County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2_, before me, a Notary Public for ' the State of Montana,personally appeared CHRIS KUKULSKI and BRIT T. FONTENOT, known to me to be the City Manager and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Bozeman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that ' they executed the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman. 1 r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for the State of Montana (Printed Name) Residing at My Commission Expires / /20 EXHIBIT" A PORTION OF FINAL PLAT OF THE ' WEST WINDS MAJOR SUBDIVISION PHASE 1A SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. ' GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ' I COBBLESTONE PLA CE I ' I N88'12'21'W 85.03, \.�\ P.0.B. I I '\\ \ (n - I Y \ \ N < 0 0 -4 I I I I \ - — — — — S89"S9'4S' 88.0' `� \\A 93T4' 3 0' r`l N89'42'S2'E 01. y9 10.4' N O C \ \ \ \ \ \ Z N89'58'37'W 201.64' I via ' I I � I LOT 3B i - - --- --- - -- - -- -- - -- - - - - - OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL) O � —N— NOT TO SCALE WEST WINDS PHASE 1A EXHIBIT A BLOCK 3, LOT 4 ACCESS EASEMENT a m 10�E RNO_ 04SO67.120 FDEC 2006 Copyright 0 2006 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. EASEMENT.DWG 1 . EXHIBIT A ' PORTION OF FINAL PLAT OF THE WEST WINDS MAJOR SUBDIVISION PHASE 1A SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T2S, RSE, P.M.M. ' GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA BREEZE LANE ---- .....-----.....__._.__. _._..-...._..._..._.._..._....._._..__..-.--._........_.....- _..._..._...--- ' 35.00' — 5881221 E 7 ,7p. 88'12'21'W 85.00' 0.B. t I 1 I I \\ I I I I I I I I � 05 O \\ ° � I �t 0�9 �,1 J CIL, Z I I I - -- i I N8812 21 W 33.00 COBBLESTONE PLACE i -N - NOT TO SCALE WEST WINDS PHASE 1A EXHIBIT A BLOCK 4, LOT 1 ACCESS EASEMENT -- 04SO67.120 TDEC 2006 Copyright 0 2006 HKM Engineering Inc.. All Rights Reserved. EASEMENT.DWG EXHIBIT A PORTION OF FINAL PLAT OF THE ' WEST WINDS MAJOR SUBDIVISION PHASE 1B SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T2S, RSE, P.M.M. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA 1 ..... _....... _......... _.... ..... _....... _...... _..... TSCHA CHE LANE ...�__...._.......- .._......____._...._..--....-------- -_- --- -� ,-- --- -- - - -- ---------� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I N90'00'00'W 168.17' \)♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ ♦ �\ ♦ \ W g� \110ox t I N90100'00'E\80.04' `\ ♦`♦ N90'00'00'E 73.11' r ` P) I \\ \ 1 I I \\♦�\\ \ N I I I � �`♦ Aga I � \ ` I �\ 4 oo \ ` O J \= I I ►y� i I \ \ \ I I 0, I I I �♦ \\ —— — — -� �__ -- P.O.B. I ♦ N8812'21'W 85.06' S881921 E _...__....1 BREEZE LANE ._..__._.- _--- -N - NOT TO SCALE WEST WINDS PHASE 1B EXHIBIT A BLOCK 7, LOT 1 ACCESS EASEMENT L67.120 DEC 2006 Copyright 0 2006 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. EASEMENT.DWG West Winds Subdivision Condominiums January 2007 Final Site Plan 1 MISCELLANEOUS LETTERS HAWS067120 ovef_toC_doC E N G I N E E R I N G 1 Ande Buffington N Bozeman Division ' vr v�►ffiWeste 1 1.�,j Telephone: (406)582-4631 Ene Fax:(406)585-9634 andrea.buffingion@northivestern.com ' January 11, 2007 Paul Yakawich HKM Engineering 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 rPaul,- Thank you for providing NorthWestem Energy the opportunity to review the proposed utility trench location for the condominium complex in West Winds Phase I and 1B. At this time, the proposed utility trench locations appear to be acceptable for providing gas ' and electric utility to the condominiums. One additional trench may be required on the south side of Breeze Lane between tempest Court and North 27th Avenue. Please let me know if you have any questions or require any further information. ' Thanks, ,s rti And Buffington 1 1 r 1 1 1 r , � e r ._ �. � .. � � � _. A.� ... ., .,_ _ ' ` ~ / � - � r a ... � .. _ �- e - J �. . l - ` � ✓ • � � � '� � .. l / - r .. w.. � � � �. A � ` � - � � -' � � / � .> - __ � a i \ ` � Y f } � t 1 � � � - � o � - � � .. v i � ` �. .. � � 7� V / v O i �.�AR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING mn COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DC� o (0mmmT7 F /+ PART I—WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 —INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 1-2 a. Executive Summary.............................................................................................................. 1-2 b. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).............................................................................. 1-4 c. Entitlements Requested ........................................................................................................ 1-5 d. Ownership Statement for Future Development of Site......................................................... 1-5 CHAPTER 2—BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW..........................................................2-1 a. Legal Description..................................................................................................................2-1 b. Project Description................................................................................................................ 2-1 Location........................................................................................:................................2-1 Primary Plan Elements...............................................................:. ......2-1 ............................ SeniorLiving.......................................................................................................... 2-1 Residential/Multi-Family...................................................................................... 2-4 c. Infrastructure.........................................................................................................................2-4 Roads..............................................................................................................................2-4 Waterand Sewer............................................................................................................ 2-5 StormDrainage .............................................................................................................2-6 Other Services ..................... 2-6 �. Irrigation .... ................................................................................................................. 2-7 d. Adjacent Zoning/Land Use................................................................................................. 2-7 Zoning ...........................................................................................................................2-7 LandUse........................................................................................................................ 2-7 e. Land Use and Density........................................................................................................2-10 f. Development Phasing.........................................................................................................2-10 CHAPTER 3—UDO DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS .....................................................3-1 a. Application Forms................................................................................................................. 3-1 b. Ownership............................................................................................................................. 3-1 c. Statement of Planning Objectives......................................................................................... 3-1 d. UDO Compliance.................................................................................................................. 3-2 AllDevelopment ........................................................................................................... 3-2 Residential...................................................................................................................... 3-9 e. Affordable Housing Compliance........................................................................................3-11. f. Growth Policy Compliance .................................................................................................3-12 g. Statement of Proposed Ownership of Open Space.............................................................3-14 h. Statement of Future Ownership of PUD.............................................................................3-14 i. Description of Rational Behind Assumptions and Choices.................................................3-15 j. Requested Relaxations form UDO ......................................................................................3-15 k. Land Use Conflict Mitigation.............................................................................................3-17 1. Statement of Design to Reduce Energy Consumption.........................................................3-17 ?� m. Development Schedule 3-17 n. Site Plan 3-17 .............................................................................................................................. Page i ENGINEERING PART I—WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT'D Page CHAPTER 4—DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ...............................................................4-1 a. Description of Submittal Requirements................................................................................4-1 b. Description of Coordination with applicable Review Procedures........................................4.1 c. Complete List of Proposed or Potential Land Use................................................................4-1 d. Sign Guidelines.....................................................................................................................4-1 e. Perimeter Buffering.....................<.........................................................................................4-1 f. Landscaping Guidelines ........................................................................................................4-2 g. Design Guidelines for Outdoor Storage................................................................................4-2 h. Protective Covenants ............................................................................................................4-2 i. Parking...................................................................................................................................4-2 J. Dimensional Requirements....................................................................................................4-2 k. Lighting .................................................................................................................................4-2 1. Architectural Guidelines........................................................................................................4-2 m. Provisions for Utilities ........................................................................................................4-2 n. Guidelines for Noise.............................................................................................................4-2 o. Improvements Schedule........................................................................................................4-2 CHAPTER 5—MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT..........................................5-1 a. Landforms, Slope, and Topography...................................................................................... 5-1 Development Guidelines and Standards b. Geology................................................................................................................................. 5-3 Development Guidelines and Standards........................................................................ 5-3 c. Hydrology............................................................................................................................. 5-4 IrrigationDitches .......................................................................................................... 5-4 Development Guidelines and Standards........................................................................ 5-6 Storm and Melt Water Drainage ................................................................................... 5-6 Development Guidelines and Standards........................................................................ 5-6 FloodHazard Evaluation............................................................................................... 5-7 Wetlands ........................................................................................................................ 5-7 Development Guidelines and Standards........................................................................ 5-7 Groundwater .................................................................................................................. 5-7 Development Guidelines and Standards........................................................................ 5-8 d. Soils....................................................................................................................................... 5-8 e. Vegetation...........................................................................................................................5-10 Development Guidelines and Standards......................................................................5-10 f. Noxious Weed Management and Re-vegetation Plan.........................................................5-10 g. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat.............................................................................................5-12 h. Historical ............................................................................................................................5-14 i. View Shed............................................................................................................................5-14 CHAPTER 6—COMMUNITY FACILITIES, UTILITIES AND PARKS........................6-1 a. Water Supply......................................................................................................................... 6-2 Background.................................................................................................................... 6-2 Page ii i Nf.INE E 0.1N� PART I—WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT'D Page ProjectArea Water Supply............................................................................................ 6-2 Phasing........................................................................................................................... 6-2 Mitigation....................................................................................................................... 6-5 b. Wastewater Collection and Treatment.................................................................................. 6-5 Project Area Wastewater Collection and Treatment...................................................... 6-5 Phasing..............................................:............................................................................. 6-5 Mitigation....................................................................................................................... 6-6 c. Storm Drainage ..................................................................................................................... 6-6 Background.................................................................................................................... 6-6 Collection, Storage, and Release ................................................................................... 6-6 Phasing........................................................................................................................... 6-7 Impacts and Mitigation Measures.................................................................................. 6-7 d. Roads..................................................................................................................................... 6-7 Background.................................................................................................................... 6-7 RoadImprovements ....................................................................................................6-10 Phasing.........................................................................................................................6-12 e. Parks....................................................................................................................................6-12 • Background..................................................................................................................6-12 On-Site Park Facilities.................................................................................................6-12 ParkStatistics...............................................................................................................6-17 f. Public Safety........................................................................................................................6-17 Background..................................................................................................................6-17 Planning Area Public Safety........................................................................................6-18 g. Historic or Archeological Resources..................................................................................6-18 h. Schools...............................................................................................................................6-18 Background..................................................................................................................6-18 Phasing..:......................................................................................................................6-19 i. Telephone Service................................................................................................................6-19 Background..................................................................................................................6-19 Preliminary Planning Area Telephone Service Information.......................................6-19 Projected Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Including Phasing.................................6-19 j. Electrical Service.................................................................................................................6-19 Background..................................................................................................................6-19 Preliminary Planning Area Electrical Service Information ........................................6-19 Phasing.........................................................................................................................6-20 Projected Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Including Phasing.................................6-20 Page iii F.NG 1N EE RI N PART I-WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FIGURES, TABLES, AND APPENDICES FIGURES Figure1.1 -Vicinity Map.......................................................................................................... 1-1 Figure1.2 -Master Plan............................................................................................................ 1-3 Figure2.1 - Land Use Diagram .................................................................................................2-2 Figure 2.2-Adjoining Land Use Map......................................................................................2-8 Figure2.3 -City Zoning Map ................................................................................................... 2-9 Figure 2.4-Project Phasing Diagram.....................................................................................2-11 Figure3.1 -Parcelization Map.................................................................................................. 3-8 Figure 5.1 -USGS Site Topography Map...............................................:................................. 5-2 Figure5.2 -- Water Features....................................................................................................... 5-5 Figure5.3 -NRCS Soils Map ................................................................................................... 5-9 Figure5.4-Vegetation Map...................................................................................................5-11 Figure 5.5 -Wildlife Use Areas .............................................................................................5-13 Figure6.1 -Water System Plan ................................................................................................ 6-3 Figure 6.2-Sanitary Sewer Plan............................................................................................... 6-4 Figure6.3 -Storm Water Plan .................................................................................................. 6-8 Figure 6.3a-Storm Water Plan Section A:A............................................................................. 6-9 Figure6.4-Road Plan.............................................................................................................6-11 Figure6.5 -Regional Park Plan..............................................................................................6-14 Figure6.6-Park/Trail Plan...................................................................................................6-15 Figure 6.7-Regional Trail Plan..............................................................................................6-16 TABLES Table 2.1 -Off-Site Connecting Roadways Page 2-4...............................................................2-5 Table 2.2-Existing Water and Sewer Mains............................................................................2-6 Table 2.3 -Service Providers ...................................................................................................2-6 Table2.4-Project Density......................................................................................................2-10 Table3.1 -Park Area Required................................................................................................. 3-5 Table3.2-Park Area Provided................................................................................................. 3-5 Table 3.3 -Performance Points ................................................................................................ 3-7 Table 3.4-Affordable Housing Area......................................................................................3-11 Table 5.1 - West Winds Community noxious weed summary................................................5-12 Table6.1 -Build-Out Summary................................................................................................ 6-1 Table 6.2-Existing Water and Sewer Mains............................................................................ 6-2 Table 6.3 "Off--Site Connecting Roadways............................................................................6-10 Table6.4-Park Area Provided...............................................................................................6-17 Table6.5 -Park Area Required...............................................................................................6-17 Table 6.6-District Estimated Additional Students.................................................................6-18 Table 6.7-District Estimated Available Spaces.....................................................................6-18 Tale 6.8 - Anticipated Students (Adjusted)............................................................................6-19 Page iv ENGINEE 0.IN� • 0 PART I—WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FIGURES, TABLES,AND APPENDICES CONT'D APPENDIXES Appendix A Service Provider Letters Part I Letters Sent Part II Letters Received Appendix B PUD and Subdivision Application Appendix C Site Plan Appendix C.1 Illustrative Plan Appendix D Geotechnical Investigation Report Appendix E Stormwater Investigation Report Appendix F Wetlands Delineation Report Appendix G Groundwater Investigation Appendix H Noxious Weed Management and Re-Vegetation Plan Appendix I Road Sections Appendix J Water System Report Appendix K Sanitary Sewer System Report • Appendix L Traffic Report Appendix M Park Plan Appendix N Neighborhood Center Plan Appendix 0 Existing Easements Page v E N G -- - -- 1 u u i •. I i . w ----- ; IM I - —-- I t�� _ ■ lad - - r—� IL KF IL .�II I / 14 •/= -fLF LJr L� 0 IF PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY ^ 777777 1 r PARK LAND OPEN SPACE �f TOWNHOME LOTS CONCEPTUAL BUILDINGS WETLANDS I DITCH FEATURES 7-7 son r , r _k /i \ J - �" lSTREETS AND DRIVES milml Lm 71 a• - .3" •- _ _ - -.. �'•. 6` 0 � m � o0 Z � 1 ORVQLe{WAY 't pA ffi I W S T WINDS F 2 C MMUNI T Y BAXTER LN �o WI¢lY011 DGRIMF-13 0 oDQ -� N W OAK ST uaais,sn y�f,07 t -c . �• IQ) A - Z � - C F1 FIE—+ DURS TON RD JEA c ©6�R® e' R I �,' W MAINS El 'Ell E`J E[11� o I W BA BLOCK S T. ABcx_an. e f ,Liai: srr W.EI _ �',.tl n EU 0 El El w,9Q IF U Egl' :< v mY �• ( '� 'et 1�,� yak Liaao001 LEGEND WES T WINDS COMMUNI T Y W Roads NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA �NOIN��tINOCity Limits _N_ HKM Engineedng InC. Parks VICINITY MAP N McChesney Professlonal Bldg. 601 Hides Dr„SUlfe 2 _Trails Bozeman,MT 59715 o (406)586M ONO Bike Path 1000 0 1000 FIGURE 1.1 FAX(406)586.1730 j Schools oeolo loot OATS FEB.27,2004 PROJECT NO.045087.110 b Copyj0t a 2004 H101 EnginoorLng Ina,AB Rights RotrwE. �t • ,� i� �. �� �E ,� �r l �f �� �� �.. �� • • West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • Chapter 1 -- Introduction a. Executive Summary The West Winds Planned Community is located within the Northwest'/a of Section 2,Township 2 South, Range 5 East, PMM, Bozeman, Montana(See Figure 1.1 —Vicinity Map). West Winds is a planned mixed use residential community providing housing opportunities for a diverse group of residents, including: • Seniors housing,ranging from skilled nursing care to independent living; • Single-family lots ranging from 9,000 to 5,000 SF affordable housing lots to smaller townhouse lots offering the opportunity for first-time home buyers; and • Multi-residential units allowing individuals to live close toawork and utilize the adjacent and surrounding recreational amenities. The pre-application submittal of West Winds included Neighborhood Business District(B-1) land use. Based on Planning Staff and City Commission comments, the proposed B-1 area has been changed to residential land use. However, dependent on adjoining development trends and market pressures, the applicant reserves the right to request a modification to the PUD approval to permit B-1 land use at the northeast and northwest corners of the property. It is understood that any such modification to the PUD would be processed per current UDO requirements. The centerpiece of the West Winds Community is an expansive north/south linear park(West . Winds Park)providing active and passive recreational opportunities and a Neighborhood Community Center. The community center will be a gathering place for all residents to enjoy such things as a neighborhood barbecues, share in a game of volleyball, provide youth soccer practice fields, or host a neighborhood meeting. To allow for future mass-transit systems within Bozeman,West Winds has incorporated transit stops throughout this master planned community. The transit stops' will allow residents from other areas of Bozeman the ability and ease to come and enjoy West Winds Park, visit residents of the Skilled Nursing Facility and participate in events at the community center. Within the West Winds development itself, the transit stops will provide the residents easy access to a future citywide transit system. The road, lot,open space and park configuration of the community has emphasized preservation of an abandoned irrigation ditch corridor(lateral Farmers Canal Ditch Company) that bisects the property south to north. Though man-made, over the years the ditch lateral has fostered the growth of wetland species creating a jurisdictional wetland corridor through the property. This wetland corridor has intrinsic aesthetic and passive recreational value.The irrigation lateral runs down the center of West Winds Park that will serve to buffer the wetlands area from adjoining residential lots and streets. An extensive recreational trail system will parallel the wetland system allowing residents to view the flora and fauna associated with the wetlands. The trail system will connect the West Winds Park and the remainder of the West • 1 Transit stops are planned at the Neighborhood Center and Skilled Nursing Facility. Page 1-2 E NOINEEIING • • • •.. •' I' ' � � � I I '� j 7lr `I t • • f i '� +�I �I ,I� i �I 1 - i �, ._ - � 1 0 • West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • Winds Community to adjacent neighborhoods, commercial areas (Baxter Meadows), and regional parks (Rose Park and the 100-acre Regional Park). West Winds Park with Wetland Area • Senior living is a major component of the project. The senior independent and assisted living comprises approximately 1/a of the net residential area (see Figure 1.2—Master Plan). The intent of the senior facilities is to provide diverse living opportunities for the senior portion of the community ranging from independent living to a skilled nursing facility. The senior living facilities will be divided into two primary areas; assisted and independent living. The Assisted Living Facility will consist of a primary care facility that will accommodate 150 to 200 residents, plus individual cottages. The Assisted Living Facility will provide food service, skilled nursing services, medical and medication management, laundry and other miscellaneous services. The senior independent living areas are the three remaining larger block areas in the senior designated portion of the project. At the hub of the independent living area will be a Senior Neighborhood Center intended to provide social and recreation activities to the senior community. b.Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) In November 2003, the Bozeman City Commission adopted the Unified Development Ordinance (effective 1-1-04). "The intent of the UDO is to protect the public health, safety and public welfare; to recognize and balance the various rights and responsibilities relating to land ownership, use and development identified in the United States and State of Montana constitutions, and statutory and common law; to implement the City's adopted growth policy; and to meet the requirements of the state law."This Planned Unit Development and subsequent subdivision applications will be prepared per the guidelines set forth in the UDO. • Page 1-4 E NGINEE EI NG i • • • '� 1� �I �'� � � ;� � � � 4 � � 1 ��I '� . ,.• i '� ti I ; . West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • c..Entitlements Requested The following entitlements are specifically requested under this PUD application: • Approval of the overall Master Plan as the basis for future subdivision applications; • Approval of land use types and densities; • Approval of generalized circulation system including internal and perimeter roadways and the internal pedestrian trail system; • Approval of the generalized water, wastewater and storm water systems; and • Approvals of the generalized open space and park system, specifically to the.total quantity of open space and parks, and phasing of the parks. d. Ownership Statement for Future Development of Site The West Winds Community is proposed to be a phased project being built-out over a 5 to 12 year period dependent on market conditions. The means of phasing will be by multiple subdivisions. With each subsequent subdivision the remainder parcel will stay in Quest West LLC (or their assigns) ownership. The individual subdivision lots and parcels will be sold to individuals and/or builders for development. Parks and open space.will.be either dedicated to the City,or transferred to the homeowners associations for management and maintenance. • Page 1-5 ENGINEERING West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Chapter 2 - Background & Overview a. Legal Description The legal description of the West Winds Planned Community is as follows: NW1/4 of Section 2,Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County,Montana(Deed Reference: Film 174,page 751). b. Project Description Location The West Winds Planned Community is located in Bozeman,Montana within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M.,Bozeman,Montana. The Community is physically identified as the 161.3-acre (Gross Area)parcel bounded by Oak Street(south), Baxter Lane(north), 27th Street projected (east) and Davis Lane projected (west) (see Figure 1.1 —Vicinity Map). Primary Plan Elements There are three primary elements or area types within the West Winds Community(see Figure 2.2—Land Use Diagram): • Senior Living; • Residential; and • Multi-family Senior Living The Senior Living area can be further broken down into the following sub-areas: • Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF); • Assisted Living Cottages; • Independent Residential; • Senior Neighborhood Center; and E • Parks and Open Space �� - - . .. i� i�i ` �,� • The SNF will be the primary care '! giving facility providing 24-hour on-site supervision, skilled nursing services,medical and medication management, food service, laundry, housekeeping, and local •�' transportation. Using similar Example Skilled Nursing Facility—Portland Oregon Page 2-1 ENGINEERING Q , LANDUSE p , S ► crav►�1 PY+n9►� PP West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • facilities as a guide, it is anticipated that the main structure will be comprised of one and two bedroom apartments, common kitchen and dining room areas, exercise and physical therapy facilities,workshops, gift shop,banking facility, administrative office and a limited number of Class `B"Beds for short term acute illness convalescence. The SNF will be located at the very southwest corner of the West Winds Community and will accommodate 150 to 200 residents. To facilitate the efficient and economic utilization of the skilled nursing and food service functions, the senior facilities have been grouped surrounding the SNF. Directly to the east of the SNF and within short walking distance are the Assisted Living Cottages. The cottages are intended for more independent seniors not requiring 24-hour on-site supervision but who wish to utilize elements of the SNF, such as the food service, nursing, and laundry services. The independent senior residential areas are contained within the three blocks surrounding the SNF and cottages. -These residential units are intended for independent seniors who have minimal reliance (if any) on the services provided by the SNF. The independent senior residential areas will consist of multi-family condominiums, townhouses and apartments accessed by private roads with off-street parking. In planning a senior community, it is important to consider the health of both persons in a senior couple. At any given time one spouse may require a variety of skilled nursing services ranging from weekly home visits for medication management to • short-term convalescence for an acute illness. While the other spouse may be totally independent and actively participating in a variety of activities ranging from socializing at the Senior Neighborhood Center to fly- fishing on the Madison River. The proposed Senior Neighborhood Center will be located near the center of the Example Senior Neighborhood Center senior independent area. The Senior Neighborhood Center is intended to be a meeting place for the senior community,providing meeting rooms, a kitchen for events, game room, craft room and workshop facilities. Surrounding the Senior Neighborhood Center will be open/park space. • Page 2-3 IL ENGINEERING 01111111111111 ;I i • � i I � f . i ; ' f • �,� 0 0 West Winds—PreliminaryPlanned Unit Development March 2004 opme 5, • Residential/Multi-Family The residential/multi-family areas can be further broken down into the following sub-areas: • Single Family; • Town Houses; • Multi-Family; • Apartments; • Neighborhood Center; and • Parks and Open Space The residential area will be similar in nature to the adjoining residential land use. Single-family lots will range from '/a to 1/8-acre lots with access provided by 33' to 40' wide public streets with sidewalk and boulevard strip. The multi-family and apartments will be comprised of duplexes, four-plexes, townhouses and multi-unit apartment structures. Lot configuration will be fee simple townhouse lots, condominiums, or large parcel for apartment rental units. Access to the multi-family and apartments will typically be by private roads with connections to the public street grid. Garage and off-street parking will be provided. c. Infrastructure The West Winds Community is located within the City Limits of Bozeman, Montana. The • project proposes to utilize City of Bozeman and other public utility infrastructures to provide required services to the community. Below is a brief summary of service suppliers and availability(see appendix A for utility provider letters); detailed evaluation of infrastructure is provided in subsequent chapters of this li appati c ion. ,r ' Roads Connection to the existing C ity transportation network will be by existing and proposed ' arterials, collectors, and local streets. Table 2.1 summarizes =_ off-site roads that will connect West Winds to the transportation network. Oak Street-South Boundary of West Winds • Page 2-4 E NOINEERIN6 West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • Table 2.1 —Off-Site Connecting Roadways' Street Standard Status/Improvements Oak Street Principal Existing: Fully constructed to east of West Winds, constructed Arterial to '/z road standard along south boundary of West winds. Improvements: West Winds to construct remaining north %2 of road section along south boundary of community. Tschache Local Existing: Fully constructed adjacent to Home Depot. Lane Street Improvements: West Winds will construct to a 40' width local street standard with 5' bike lane within the project. Baxter Lane Minor Existing: Constructed to rural standard. Arterial Improvements: West Winds to up-grade south '/z of roadway adjacent to project. Davis Lane Minor Existin : Constructed to rural gravel standard north of West Arterial Winds. Improvements: West Winds to construct east %i adjacent to ro'ect. North 271 Collector Existing: Constructed to south of West Winds. Avenue Street Improvements: West Winds to construct west '/z adjacent to proj ect. Buckrake Local Existin : Constructed to south of West Winds. Avenue Street Improvements: West Winds will construct to local street • standard within project. Hunters Local Existin : Constructed to south of West Winds. Way Street Improvements: West Winds will construct to local street standard within project. The West Winds Community is bounded to all sides by arterials and collector standard streets. Section 18.44.090 of the UDO limits residential access to arterials and collectors. Therefore, access to the individual lots and homes within the community will be by internal public local standard and private standard streets. Appendix I contain the proposed road section for the internal and perimeter roads associated with West Winds. Water and Sewer Water and sanitary sewer service is proposed to be supplied by the City municipal systems. Water and sewer mains are currently adjacent to, or bi-sect the project. Table 2.2 below summarizes existing mains. • See Appendix I fo_Road Sections 2 Road improvements will be phased based on subdivision phasing. Page 2-5 ENGINEERING West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Table 2.2—Existing.Water and Sewer Mains • Water Sewer Street Main Main Comment Oak Street _10'/12" "20 Sewer main SID 621 Baxter Lane 241.' SID 621 . North 27` Avenue .10 Water main within projected alignment of N. V along east.boundary of project. Davis Lane 12" Water main within projected alignment of .. .... Davis Lane along.west boundary of project... Buckrake Street 20" SID:621 ro'ected) For internal distribution and collection water and sewer mains will be constructed within the proposed public road R/W or utility easements. The project also has reserve sewer capacity Pursuant the XL Limited Partnership Annexation Agreement dated 12/1/1997...Within the annexation agreement the property has reserve truck main sewer(S'ID 621) capacity.of 307,200 gallons per average daily flow, or 960 residential dwelling units. Storm Drainage Storm water co llection and management will be conducted in accordance with City standards: Storm water will be.collected by curb & gutter,and routedao detention ponds:by catch basin and storm pipe. Storm water will be released from :he project at or below 10-year pre-development rates. r Other Services Table 2.3 below summarizes other infrastructure/life safety service vendors thatmill be utilized by the community(see appendix A) Table 2.3—Service Providers Service Com an Power Northwest Energy r Natural Gas Northwest Energy .Cable Television .. Bresnan Police City of.Bozeman Fire. . City of Bozeman ' Ambulance AMR Hospital Bozeman Deaconess Public School Bozeman School.District No..7 Mail Service U.S.P.S. Page 2-6 ■.�� ENOINEEYIN6 �; ,; , �: 'i �� ;� Y •I� l{I` 5 1 • • West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • Irrigation The West Winds Community currently has three irrigation ditches that flow through or adjacent to the property(see Figure 5.2 - Water Features Map). 1. The center ditch is an abandoned lateral of the Farmer Canal and lies within the linear park. No changes are proposed for this ditch. 2. The east ditch, also a Farmers Canal lateral,was dug approximately 20 years ago to replace the center ditch. This irrigation ditch flows south to north through the east 1/4 of the property. Based on correspondence withw --- -� -- - Bob Davis, President of the Farmers Canal Ditch Company, this ditch can be abandoned 3. The Section Line ditch lies along the west boundary of the project. This ditch will be slightly relocated to • align within the proposed center median On-Site IrrigationDitches of Davis Lane. d.Adjacent Zoning/Land Use Zoning The West Winds Community is currently zoned R-3, adjoined zoning is primarily residential with the exception of B-1 zoning to the northwest of the project(see Figure 2.3 —City Zoning Map). Land Use West Winds is surrounded by a variety of land use that can be generalized as residential mixed use (See,Figure 2.2—Adjoining Land Use Map). To the south of the community the land use is multi-family(Castlebar Apartments) and single-family(Harvest Creek Subdivision). To the west is the 100-acre Regional Park and Baxter Meadows. To the north are larger rural tract(1 acre and larger)properties with the exception of Baxter Square Subdivision that recently received preliminary plat approval. Baxter Square Subdivision is a 104-lot townhouse project with 3000 SF lots. Lastly,to the east lay two larger vacant parcels (10 and 20 acres); Rose Park, • the High Gate Project (45-50 unit senior project) and Home Depot fronting onto North 19th Avenue. The mixed use and density proposed by the West Winds Community is consistent with the existing adjacent land use. Page 2-7 ENOINEERINO • ti • i �� i .I �k r • i'r-h V 1J V f:.lAIl41�y t P-•r o f .; .. .. SI��jt v n _ IL cl •• • u a t W WEST WINDS COMMUN I T Y NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. Q GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA tNOlNtttlNO � _N_ KKMb&=ftkm ADJOINING L A iND 601 Mdw Dr Wte2 USE PLAN Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)586.M FIGURE 2.2 00 FAX(406)586-1780 1000 o toI '+ scds twtCATE, FM 27.2004 PRC.ECT VG 015067.110 6 Ca idtt 0 2004 HN EnOww nq Yic.AN Rights Rni • • �\ :� E �. {� 1 ` ' �44I � I1 11 1VVV� l��I� 1� ■I � I ilk I,1 ' `l I i�I � � • � ` 1 i °WES T WINDS COMMUNITY _ ' OC7 t � --- .1 6 \•M.t 11 n 1 I iyl•,��� -, l � ! i •I t i - W LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y WtIa PIMuWUN Du1gn,Uon NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. ❑AP., p 0m,,,,,,1—,,,,,,a, p,,,,,,,,,,,, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA /NOIN///INO p rd co... C]suwom w>b.nr HKM Engineedny Inc. McChesney Professional Bldg. p„,�,, ,,,�,,,.t,,, o�� CITY ZONING MAP 601 Res Dr.,Suite2 a,WNftLanb Bozeman,lr';T59715 pa,.o,,s„�;LewQ.�.1�, cswrsa.u\\rwn . F�nzd(4o6 t73o M"'°L"wAw- Nam" t000 0 1000 FIGURE 2.3 m � �"""tl11 in05iNo� wds tat OATS FEE.27.2004 _ PROJECT NO.04S0/7.i10 m Cogy$ght 0 20L4 HM Engineering Ina.An Right.R\nrv,d. -- � ! � ;� �; . ., . y �� �i , I• 1 it �� � � i l�i i�i ��!. it I i i il� {� I�' i ' IIfIf f i _ � DENSITY 4 West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 e. Land Use and Density Proposed land use is shown on Figure 2.1 —Land Use Diagram. Table 2.4—Project Density- below provides anticipated residential unit density ranges within specific land use categories. Within the multi-family areas,precise unit counts are unknown until specific projects are designed and submitted for the areas. Table 2.4—Project Density Land Use �z , �, ,� r �,._•, ,, ,r. , w L et f' e ensi per' t i . nits Y Senior Residential Multi-Family 21.85 '11.26; 246 Skilled Nursing Facility 6.53 W-"'22.9.8 150 Subtotal 28.38 ,;'_ 13.95 396 Residential ``; ' Single-Family 35.63 5.98 213 Town-House 8.31 11.07 92 Multi-Family 16.22 12.15 197 Apartment 4.75 13.05 62 Subtotal 64.91 8.69 564 Total 93.28 10.29 1960 Table Notes: 1. Dwelling unit counts for multi-family family, SNF and apartments estimated based on maximum density. 2. Net land area excludes road R/W and parks. f. Development Phasing The West Winds Community is proposed to be a"Phased Planned Unit Development,"permitted in compliance with Section 18.36.070(A)(2.) of the UDO. Said section is for"Application for Approval if Initial Phase of the PUD —With subsequent Phases Master Planned and Subject to Development Guidelines". The project will be phased by Site Plan and subdivision applications with infrastructure improvements being constructed per phase. Figure 2.4—Project Phasing Diagram;presents the projected phasing of the project. With a project of this magnitude, it is not practical to precisely forecast the build-out of a project. As the project matures with the construction of subsequent phases, it may be necessary to amend the phasing boundaries to reflect market forces and trends. Therefore, the Project Phasing diagram is intended to be a dynamic document to be revised as the project builds out. Page 2-10 EN GIWNG West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Chapter 3 —UDO Document Requireme'nts a. Application Forms Pursuant to Section 18.78.120(B.)(1.)(a.), Attached in Appendix B is the application form for the Planned Unit Development. b. Ownership As required by Section 18.78.120(B.)(1.)(b.)below is owner and applicant information. The property is owned by, and the PUD applicant is: Quest West L.L.C. Managing Member: John Dunlap 3825 Valley Commons Drive, Suite 4 Bozeman,Montana 585-9230 c.Statement of Planning Objectives The planning objectives of West Winds Community is to create a livable community. In order to • create a livable community, it must contain identity, innovation, affordability, variety, excitement, and convenience. Every residential neighborhood is related to and a part of a larger community, in this case Bozeman. While West Winds is part of a larger whole, the development should have its own identity or distinction to set it apart from all others. Innovation is obtained by creatively design-ing a residential community around unique natural features (i.e. linear park with wetlands) and incorporating inventive features into the neighborhood design (i.e. community center, senior community center, transit stops, senior living neighborhood, etc.) West Winds has incorporated a variety of housing types and sizes to build "affordability" into the neighborhood. Affordability is the ability to purchase a home and the things that go along with it at a reasonable cost. With smaller single-family lots and townhouse lots, West Winds will be able to reach a variety of people within Bozeman's . housing market. West Winds Park—Passive and Active Recreation Page 3-1 . ENGINEERING PUD RESPONSES West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Variety within a residential community is essential for the health of its residents. Variety within the West Winds is achieved by several means: • Varying sizes of lots and square footage of residential units; • An extensive park complex with passive and active facilities along with the unique community center and its recreational opportunities; • Varying housing types from a full-range of senior housing options to multi-family and single-family developments. Convenience and excitement are obtained at West Winds by offering transit stops to an extensive recreational trail system and community center that will offer interesting social events and offer interesting recreational opportunities for the residents and guests alike creates even more excitement. d. UDO Compliance The West Winds Community has been designed in accordance with the Unified Development Ordinance. The following is an item-by-item response to Section 18.36.090(E) of the UDO. The UDO requirement is set forth in standard font, West Wind development responses are italicized. All Development 1. Does the development comply with all City design standards,requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways, sanitary supply, irrigation companies,fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? o Water Supply: Water mains are present on three sides of the property, all water system improvements will be designed and constructed in conformance with City standards. During DRC review of the Concept Plan there was no immediate concerns from the Engineering or Public Works Department regarding water supply(see appendix J— Water System Report). o Trails/WalksBike Ways: The West Winds Community is in compliance with City Trail and Bike Path Master Plans supplying connections to the north-south and east-west trail corridors. A trail system-is proposed within West Winds Park that bisects the project north to south connecting the Harvest Creek trail to Baxter Lane. In addition, an east— west connection is made to Rose Park and the 100-acre Regional Park through the combination of natural fines trails and the roadside sidewalks. The Bicycle Advisory Board had no objections to the project. Bike lanes are proposed for Tschache, Davis and Baxter Lanes, North 27`h Avenue and Oak Street adjacent to the project (see appendix M —Park Plan). o Sanitary Supply: A 20" diameter sewer main bisects the property. Under the XL Limited Partnership Annexation, the property has reserved truck sewer capacity of 960 dwelling units. All sewer main improvements will be designed and constructed in conformance with City standards. During DRC review of the Concept Plan there was no immediate Page 3-2 EN,INEEZING West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5,2004 • concern from the Engineering or Public Works Department regarding sanitary sewer supply (see Appendix K—Sanitary Sewer System Report). o 1irrigation Companies: Three irrigation ditches(2 active, 1 abandoned) cross or are adjacent to the project. The Farmers Canal Ditch Company has been contacted and has agreed to the modification of these ditches. o Fire Protection: During the DRC review for the concept plan and pre-application, there were no immediate concerns from the fire department or emergency services. Improvements will adhere to City Fire Code requirements. o Electricity: A copy of the Master Plan with summary narrative has been sent to Northwestern Energy for service comment. Northwestern Energy will provide electrical service. o Flood Hazard Areas: The project is not in a flood hazard area. o Natural Gas: A copy of the Master Plan has been sent to Northwestern Energy for service comment. Northwestern Energy will provide natural gas service. o Telephone: A copy of the Master Plan has been sent to Qwest for service comment. Qwest will provide natural telephone service. o Storm Drainage: A storm drainage report and management plan has been prepared per Engineering Department Concept Plan comments. Storm drainage improvements will be designed and constructed to City of Bozeman Standards (see Appendix E—Stormwater • Investigation Report). o Cable Television: A copy of the Master Plan and summary narrative has been sent to Bresnan communications for service comment. Bresnan Communications will provide cable television service. o Streets: The West Winds development has proposed a variety of north/south streets to offer connectivity to existing subdivisions and has proposed east/west streets that align themselves with the future extension of Tschache Lane and the streets within the Baxter Meadows development(south of Baxter Lane)and the 100-acre Regional Park. Street improvements will be designed and constructed to City of Bozeman standards (see Appendix 1—Road Sections). Please note the requested relaxations for access standards. 2. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? There is an existing natural vegetation corridor along the abandoned irrigation ditch which will be preserved by the area being incorporated into the park/open space/trail system of the West Winds Development (see Appendices;M—Park Plan and F- Wetland Report). 3. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g.,buildings, circulation, open space, and landscaping,etc.)designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development?Since the concept plan and pre-application submittals, additional north/south and east/west streets have been added to further enhance connectivity to the adjacent and surrounding properties. A traditional grid system development is not the best option for this property due to its existing wetlands and sensitive areas. Therefore, a "distressed grid system" was utilized,preserving the Page 3-3 fN61NEElIN� BLDG ORIENT. 4 1 West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 natural vegetation and wetland areas, but creating many north/south and east/west street alignments. 4. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? West Winds is a very energy-conscious development. Proposed throughout the development are natural trails and city standard sidewalks creating an extensive trail system. In addition, bike lanes on Tschache and the perimeter arterials and collector are proposed to offer a north/south and east/west connection.All these non-motorized transportation/recreation pathways contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project.As the Baxter Meadows commercial areas develop, these areas will be located in close proximity of walking and biking to/from West Winds. Additionally, West Winds proposes to incorporate transit stops within its development that may connect to some future city transit system. 5. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? The West Winds development is unique in itself since it offers, in one large planned community, a variety of housing types and amenities. All residents will enjoy their private spaces as well as the common park/open spaces like the trail system and community center. There will be well landscaped boulevards alon&the main roads:North 27th Avenue, Baxter Lane, Fowler Avenue, and Oak Street. Since the City does not allow multiple individual drive accesses on any of these streets, the home's rear facades will be oriented towards the stree]tTo "create ownership of the boulevard", these rear facades willbe architecturally to arpor_ate small porches and meandering concrete sidewalks to connect to the boulevard sidewalk system. This will give a similar. - appearance to th_ e�ont—of die homes. No rear yard fencing_will be allowed on these homes. 6. Park Land: Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by Chapter 18.50.020, BMC? The required amount of park space has been supplied. For the single- family and townhouse areas where lot count is known, 0.03 acres/unit will be dedicated to public park(18.50.020(A.)(1.),for multifamily/apartment areas where the final built- out density is unknown, 11% of net area will be dedicated to parks. Tables 3.1 and 3.2 below summarize park area required and provided. Page 3-4 ENGINEERING A111111111 PARK CALL. West Winds-Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Table 3.1 -Park Area Re wired Senior Residential Multi-Family 21.85 11.26 2.40 Skilled Nursing Facility 6.53 22.98 0.72 Residential Single-Family 35.63 5.98 213 6.39 Town-House 8.31 11.07 92 2.76 Multi-Family 16.22 12.15 1.78 Apartment 4.75 13.05 0.52 otal 93.28 14.58 Table Notes: 1. Park area required based on 0.03 Ac./DU for Single Family and Townhouses 2. Park area required based on 11% of net area for multi-family and apartments Table 3.2-Park Area Provided Gross West Winds Park Area (Linear Park) (Includes Neighborhood Center Parcel) 21.14 Less Wetlands 1.94 Less Stormwater Retention Areas 0.65 Net West Winds Park Area 18.55 Senior Neighborhood Center Park Area otal Net Park Area Provided 19.55 7. Performance: All PUDs shall earn at least twenty performance points. Non-residential developments within the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street corridor shall earn thirty points. Points may be earned in any combination of the following.The applicant shall select the combination of methods but the City may require documentation of performance, modifications to the configuration of open space, or other assurances that the options selected shall perform adequately. Page 3-5 ENGINEEEIN� PUD POINTS . ro West Winds-Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Table 3.3--Performance Points Given Parks Area Provided(Net: excludes, storm and 19.55 Ac. wetlands) (Includes Neighborhood and Senior Community Centers)= Park Area Required= 14.58 Ac. Excess Park Area Provided= 4.97 Ac. PUD Point Calculation Points Req'd= 20 Points Calculate 1%of Net Project Area Gross Area= 161.30 Ac. Less Park Area Required= _1 -5S-Ac:- 62 Less Permiter Roads= 12.53 Ac. Less Internal Roads= 30.34 Ac. Less Public Open Space(Park Storm Retention) OiS .c. Subtotal -- -103.20 Ac. C' 1%Net Project Area= 1.03 Ac. Calculate Performance Points Excess Park Provided 4.97 4.82 71.25Pts/ 1%774.46 1.00 0 en Space Provided 9.93 9.62 %Additional Common Open 4 4.4 11.00 Pts/ 1 Total Performance Points 20.10 Distribute Additional Open Space Area S-1 6.53 13% 0.61 9% S-2 1.88 4% 0.17 9% S-3 2.04 4% 0.19 9% S-4 3.73 8% 0.35 9% S-5 3.90 8% 0.36 9% S-6 2.81 6% 0.26 9% S-7 3.73 8% 0.35 9% S-8 3.77 8% 0.35 9% E-MF-1 3.66 7% 0.34 9% E-MF-2 1.86 4% 0.17 9% E-MF-6 6.29 13010 0.59 9% E-MF-7 4.41 9% 0.41 9% E-APT-1 4.75 10% 0.44 9% 49.35 4.59 Page 3-7 E NG1 NE Et ING AN! 0, West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 a) Provision of affordable housing: Two points for each percent of constructed dwellings in the residential development which are provided by donation or long term contractual obligation (20 year minimum)with or donation to an affordable housing agency, or other similar means; OR—One point for each constructed dwelling or lot donated to the City for affordable housing provided for by a non-residential development with appropriate assurances of its qualifying affordable status; b) Additional open space: One point for each percent of the project area that is provided as non-public open space; or one and one-quarter points for each percent of the project area that is provided as publicly accessible open space. The portion of the project to be considered in determining the size of area to be provided for open space shall be the gross projea area less areas dedicated and�txansf red to the pu ic, an orused s=pace t the parklands requirements 06) above. The area pro d for open be exc usive of yard setbacks on individually owned lots and interior parking lot landscaping, and subject to the performance standards of Chapter 18.50, BMC. West Winds has increased the amount of parks and open space to account for the required twenty(20)performance points. Table 3.3 below provides performance point calculations. The bottom figure of Table 3.3 specifies additional open space requirements to meet performance point criteria. Future site plan submittals for these parcels shall supply, at a minimum, the open space area calculated at the bottom of Table 3.3. Figure 3.1 -Parcelization Map provides the location of parcels for the distribution of required additional open space calculated by Table 3.3. Page 3-6 ENGINEERING Lor -kql I I1000 S_- --U D� mae I,03`f UAA,JS f�055;�U, .3o y 3rll�- 0.\04\S067110-TSK-. .PP -PREIIM\FI 3-1_P--.(I..*11I lup.dr 02/26/2004 09,33-30 AM MST :r C: :ii h;ttr•r� �•'}y i tF -'1 C`'f9. `�.w is U.,. . L:pH•- ��<.<•t� �`•d� c j. Y o O n z c?r c�.. I J> I �. ;r7r .�U:'i,'o-! `'a• .' y P Z A 0 `O•` / !-`etc�ti nj _ •Y _ I .._, g�3 s m•� z _''�"T' _ _ _ DAVIS LANE (M/N_OR AR_TER _A V < � ---- I -- ----_-------�--- — ------ --------------- ---------- ----- ----- � _ -_ =�•-�- r_ _ ��'--- �•' N m �'T--�-�--� , j , �WiTM-1 TI �/ -��N'Ir�'W� III- S` ^'o r•. �-i? I t l l I t r ' 9. 23�s LM L�_t_ 53� J�i •� t i I X�r , rL :t: •�t• 1 `}- p1 rr- g 8 $ RI I °'::�4 ::I � I �u ; cr'' ; ; O1 � , r—__-r-__--� �-__-�___�dj'----r-__-, ;-__•-I t , -_-_-_-- I tJi r'• #. —S ---- y "or 'A sit '`y ICI I , o t -� I ,---__• , , t-__-ti �-s �I ; r mr ;1',•� � �.�I__- I .--- _ _� I __ � I � I ICI 'ZI t I bs_'gs? ?'_.L!_' T-r -1��� IRII i ------� MMf$iBiMAlr—_-- / -3 r r 7iS Wr rr 1T-� ' '. \`\'-- CROSS AREA- 3.42 O Aa > I yl gr,SF, =�- 'fit-�\ , m /' �' STORM WATER AREA- 0.00 Ac. sL 3". F.T. jm E-6F� AREA- 5.60 Atz t r o o ---- P>r m / 33 391'SO.'FT.' o> I�ro•• > EA- o. I P A Ll_�_l�_ > I p a i._ sod i� I y t �•>�. ij "t f� (—j"-I--1 _ ` ' I 1 I T .- �T'�- { j -_�1_L - -—-— _ --- L2 ErdeKfVJ AVE I x``• C n O n7Z0 J :r,'•.=�:''1-t;II II t II•-j-�J_, �' ��-i, pC-r-THgf�-JrE�4-.--�i�_•'2t,—J_�ri-L-�rai•_--rr--r-�� Itr1-r i-I--E g9 3r iIrrS-7H Fr3�-1'SS-f0rt. mt:� 3_�i- r i 7 J _i. I m' I I I `e•>J •y`s` �' L - s Z o + �tn r N. 27th A VENUE (COLLECT R1 T94�P - - - - I TRniiT C_1.3 c � f• c.. r6o.acs -acs us. West Winds—PreliminaryPlanned Unit Development • March 5 2004 P & Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? West Winds has been proposed so that it connects to adjacent neighborhoods and subdivisions and offers similar yet diverse housing types. West Winds proposes the extension of the north/south linear park north of Oak Street to Baxter Lane. Unlike adjoining subdivisions West Wind Design Guidelines have specified that residential units backing onto the perimeter arterials and collector streets have rear facades that are architecturally designed to incorporate features giving the appearance of the front of the homes. The internal road grid of West Winds has been designed to connect with the adjoining road system. Specifically, Hunters Way and Buckrack connect to Harvest Creek Subdivision to the south, two streets on the west boundary connect to Baxter Meadows, Tschache Lane to east and Baxter Square to the north. Residential Planned unit developments in residential areas (R-S,R-1,R-2,R-3,R-4,RMH and R-O zoning districts)may include a variety of housing types designed to enhance the natural environmental, conserve energy, recognize, and to the maximum extent possible,preserve and promote the unique character of the neighborhoods, with provisions for a mix of limited commercial development.For purposes of this section, "limited commercial development"means uses listed in the B-1 neighborhood service district(Chapter 18.18,BMC), within the parameters set forth • below. All uses within the PUD must be sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood. The West Winds development is designed to include a variety of housing types enhancing the natural environment while conserving energy and promoting the unique character of neighborhoods. 1. On a net acreage basis,is the average residential density in the project (calculated for residential portion of the site only) consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the Bozeman growth policy? West Winds is anticipated to have a net area density of approximately 10.3 units per acre. The average density is similar to what would be found south of Oak Street with the Harvest Creek subdivision and Rose Apartments, the senior development, Highgate House to the east along Oak Street, Baxter Square to the north of Baxter Lane. 2. Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g.,private yards, patios and balconies, etc.) for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light, sun, ventilation,privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? There will be private outdoor areas for the residents as well as large landscape boulevard areas that will offer a feeling of openness along the busier perimeter streets. 3. Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? West Winds Park will be . extended through the West Winds development offering a passive recreational Page 3-9 E NO 1N EE E I N0 West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • opportunity and additionally, there will be active parks created near the proposed community center and transit stop. 4. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? West Winds does not propose a density bonus since the R-3 zoning district does not have a "cap"or maximum on number of residential units as long as code requirements are met. West Winds proposes a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability(lot size and unit size restriction)and diversity of housing stock(single family to townhouses to multi family structures). S. Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment,conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities?Proposed throughout the development are natural trails and city standard sidewalks creating an extensive trail system. In addition, bike lanes on Tschache Lane and along perimeter arterials and collector streets are proposed to offer north/south and east/west connections.All these non-motorized transportation/recreation pathways contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project. As the Baxter Meadows commercial areas develop, these areas will be located in close proximity of walking and biking to/from West Winds.Additionally, West Winds proposes to incorporate transit stops within its development that may connect to some future city transit system. • 6. Residential Density Bonus: If the project is proposing a residential density bonus (30 percent maximum) above the residential density of the zoning district within which the project is located and which is set forth in Chapter 18.16,BMC, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards (such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development? The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus shall be deter- mined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation shall be provided within the project. West Winds is not proposing a residential density bonus since the R-3 zoning district does not have a maximum number of units allowed as long as code requirements can be met. 7. Limited Commercial: If limited commercial development, as defined above,is proposed within the project, is less than 20 percent of the gross area of the PUD designated to be used for offices or neighborhood service activities not ordinarily allowed in the particular residential zoning district? Currently, the West Winds development does not propose any B-1 type uses within the subdivision. Logically, any future neighborhood commercial would be best located in the northeast and northwest corners of the property. With the future unknown for the success of the Baxter Meadows commercial development, the West Winds development does not currently propose any B-1 type uses, but does reserve the right to come back in the future before the necessary governing body to request a • Master Plan Amendment, Zone Map Amendment, and/or West Winds Preliminary Plan amendment as deemed necessary. Page 3-10 ENGINEEEINO West Winds—PreliminaryPlanned Unit Development • March 5, 2004 P • a) If neighborhood service activities are proposed within the project,is a market analysis provided demonstrating that less than 50 percent of the market required to support proposed neighborhood service activities is located outside the immediate area of the PUD and are the neighborhood services of a nature that does not require drive-in facilities or justification for through traffic? If the project contains limited commercial development, as defined above, is the project located at the intersection of arterial streets,or arterial and collector streets? b) If the project contains limited commercial development, as defined above, has the project been sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood and have the commercial activities been developed at a scale compatible with residential development? 8. Does the overall PUD recognize and,to the maximum extent possible,preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area?West Winds is a unique development not offered in Bozeman and would be a great asset to the overall community and surrounding neighborhoods in the area. e. Affordable Housing Compliance The West Winds Community has been designed to comply with Section 18.42.180 "Provision of • Affordable Housing". West Winds plans to meet the affordable housing requirements through the combination of RSLs and a multi-family housing parcel (18.42.180.C.1 &5). Parcel ENT-1 shown on Figure 3.1 Parcelization Map is identified as a multi-household affordable housing tract with 72 affordable housing units. In addition, single-family detached and multifamily attached affordable housing units are designated for parcels E-TH-4,E-TH-5,E-SF-2 and E-SF- 4. Table 3.4 below summarizes the affordable areas provided. Table 3.4--Affordable Housing Areas Area (See Figure 3.1—Parcelization Map) I Area (Ac.) E-MF-1 3.66 E-SF-2 0.64 E-SF-4 0.84 E-TH-2 1.58 E-TH-3 0.67 E-TH-4 1.64 E-TH-5 0.84 Total Affordable Housing Area Provided Net Development Area= 93.28 Required Affordable Housing Area(10%)= 9.33 Page 3-11 ENGINEERING GROWTH POLICY Y West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 L Growth Policy Compliance One of the primary goals of a PUD (18.36.010(A) is "To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with City's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies". Generally, there are six basic ideas, which form a foundation for many of the land use-policies of the 2020 plan. These six ideas are: • Centers • Neighborhoods • Sense of Place Integration of Action • Natural Amenities • Urban Density The first idea of centers is for a renewal of a pattern of community development which is oriented on centers rather than along corridors. Another principle that goes along with centers is the idea of compact development. This enables greater convenience for people with shorter travel distances to a wide range of businesses and services. West Winds accomplishes this theory by creating a compact residential development close to area services and businesses, accessed by integrated trails systems and street layout. In addition, the residential development itself has its own center for the enjoyment of area residents. Within the West Winds neighborhood, West Winds will provide the sense of familiarity and intimacy that is lacking in larger communities. The neighborhood activity center and local parks will provide opportunities to casually interact with other nearby residents. A sense of place is what Bozeman is about. Bozeman has a distinct character that distinguishes itself from everywhere else. Provisions for new parks and community centers, in new developments, will help to extend the sense of place as Bozeman grows. The West Winds development has a unique sense of place itself, offering a wide variety of housing types and styles and parks and open space, both passive and active areas. Neighborhoods should be reasonably compact and serve a variety of housing needs. West Winds does exactly that by offering senior housing to single-family homes to multi-family structures. Open spaces, including parks, trails, and other gathering places should be in a convenient place. West Winds has been designed to centrally locate an active park area with community center along a linear park/open space trail system. Mixed is defined in the Bozeman 2020 as a pattern or method of development that incorporates, in a mutually supportive manner, more than one land use, density or type of housing, or development character. West Winds accomplishes this by offering a diverse array of housing types for various market levels for the community of Bozeman. Goal 6.6.1 — Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City, efficiently provide public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work, and Page 3-12 ENOINEEEING OPEN SPACE West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 system within West Winds Park and the city standard sidewalks along all streets and pedestrian access areas allowing residents to gain access to open space/parks through mid blocks. g. Statement of Proposed Ownership of Open Space There are three types of open space within the West Winds Community; • Publicly accessible open space (park); • Perimeter non-public open space; and • Internal non-public open space. Publicly accessible open space will be the Parks and Neighborhood Centers. West Winds Park shall be dedicated to the City of Bozeman by the phased subdivision plats. The Neighborhood Center within West Winds Park will be sited within a separate parcel that initially will be owned and maintained by Quest West L.L.C. until dwelling unit occupancy reaches a level specified by the CCR's that triggers transfer of the Center to the Master Homeowners Association (entire West Winds Community) for ownership, operation and maintenance. The Senior Park and Center'will also be initially owned and maintained by Quest West L.L.C. until build-out within the senior portion of the project has reached a CCR specified level, at which time it will be dedicated to the Senior Homeowners Association. Perimeter non-public open space are the areas around the perimeter of the West Winds Community that are intended to serve as buffer areas. These areas are primarily located on large multifamily and senior living parcels with buffer easements to facilitate the improvement and maintenance of the buffer elements. Initially as a subdivision phase is developed this open space will remain under the management of Quest West L.L.C. for improvement and maintenance. As a specific plat or Site Plan phase becomes occupied the perimeter open space maintenance will transferred to the appropriate Home Owners Association for landscape and irrigation maintenance. Interior non-public open spaces are the areas within multi-family and apartment parcels intended for resident open space use. The ownership of these areas is dependant on the type of use. For apartment rental use the open space will be owned and maintained by the specific property owner. For condominium type ownership the open space will be owned and maintained by the condominium homeowner association. h. Statement of Future Ownership of PUD Quest West LLC intends to retain ownership of the PUD. As specific subdivision phases are filed, the remainder parcel will remain in Quest West LLC ownership. There are currently no plans to sell the project beyond the phased subdivision process. However, Quest West reserves the right to sell the project and the associated entitlements earned through the PUD approval process. Page 3-14 E NO.IN EE t IN 0 West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5,2004 • minimize sprawl. West Winds accomplishes this goal by offering a diverse residential development in close proximity to existing services(North 10 Avenue)and future services/businesses(Baxter Meadows commercial development). Goal 6.6.4—Objective 3 —Encourage the creation of well-defined residential neighborhoods. Each neighborhood should have a clear focal point, such as a park, school, other open space,or community facility, and shall be designed to promote pedestrian convenience.Bordered on all sides by main arterial and collector streets, West Winds will be a well-defined residential community unlike other area subdivisions. It will have a central park with a community center, active and passive parks and open space, and a trails system and bicycle infrastructure that will encourage area residents to use multi-modal forms of transportation. In addition, transit stops have been incorporated into the design of the West Winds development. Promote the construction of a wide variety of housing types to meet the wide range of residential needs of Bozeman residents. West Winds will offer an entire senior area'With independent living structures to a central assisted/skilled nursing living facility.Additionally, there will be multi- family structures, townhouses, and single-family homes offered with restricted lot sizes and restricted unit sizes to bring more affordability to Bozeman residents. Protect important wildlife habitats and natural areas. West Winds wishes to preserve the natural vegetation and wetlands that are associated with the existing abandoned irrigation ditch traversing the property from the south to the north. West Winds has designed a trail system • along this natural corridor for the enjoyment and use of residents and guests as well. Goal 9.9—Provide for accessible, desirable, and maintained public parks, active and passive open spaces, trails systems, and recreational facilities for residents of the community. West Winds accomplishes this goal with the 22.14 acres(gross)of parkland(gross area, includes senior park)and a minimum of 14.53 acres of open space. Within the dedicated parks, there will be areas for active recreational use such a ball or soccer field, or volleyball court, etc. Within the linear park, there will be natural fines trail system constructed adding to the amenities provided to the residents of West Winds and the surrounding area. Goal 10.8.3—Encourage transportation options that reduce resource consumption, increase social interaction, support sage neighborhoods, and increase the ability of the existing transportation facilities to accommodate a growing city. West Winds has designed the street layout to best connect to surrounding existing subdivisions to the extent possible allowed by code requirements. West Winds Park has been extended from the south within the Harvest Creek subdivision through the West Winds development. The future extension of Tschache Lane will line up with proposed Tschache Lane within the West Winds development. In addition, there will be bike lanes on Tschache Lane and the perimeter arterial and collector streets to create both north/south and east/west bike lane connections for bicyclists. Goal 10.8.4 Pathways—establish and maintain an integrated system of transportation and recreational pathways, including bicycle and pedestrian trails,neighborhood parks, green belts • and open space. West Winds is on compliance with the 2020 Trail Plan with an extensive trail Page 3-13 _EN 6 � • " 4RELAXATIM West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 i. Description of Rational Behind Assumptions and Choices The underlying rational behind the assumptions and choices made in planning the West Winds Community are based on creating a quality-planned community with attractive amenities. This will be achieved by preserving existing sensitive area features (wetlands and mature vegetation) within an extension park system. The preservation of sensitive areas combined with a trail system and Neighborhood Center will create a very livable community that helps insure the economic success of the project. j. Requested Relaxations from UDO Chapter 18.16.020.B —Allow assisted living/elderly care facilities within R-3 zoning. The West Winds development would provide a variety of senior housing types from assisted/skilled nurse living within an organized facility to townhouses/condominiums to individual cottages for independent living. Chapter 18.16.020.B — Allow for apartments within the R-3 zoning district. In order to provide the Bozeman community with a well-diversified housing, West Winds proposes housing from single-family to apartment-style housing. Some of these housing types will be located on smaller lots and have limitations as to the size of residential units, which will lead to better affordability within the Bozeman market. Chapter 18.42.030—(Double Frontage)—Allow for double frontage for perimeter lots adjacent to arterial and collector standard streets. This requested relaxation is based on access control requirements for arterial and collector standard streets. Chapter 18.42.040.B — (Block Length) —Allow for maximum block length to be greater than 400' (distances based on R/W to R/W distance). This requested relaxation is based on presence of critical lands and access control. Historically Bozeman has been developed on a grid system for street layouts, because of critical lands and access control a traditional grid system is not a suitable solution for West Winds. West Winds utilized a"distressed grid" that accounts for jurisdictional wetlands within the linear park. To minimize disturbance to critical wetlands, road alignments have been set at specific locations to minimize disturbance to, and/or avoid wetland areas. The West Winds community has arterial standard roads to three sides and a collector standard road on the east side. Arterials and collector standard roads have specific minimum access separation requirements that cause block length to exceed 400 feet. To mitigate block length, mid-block pedestrian corridor will be provided to access the park trail system. Chapter 18.42.040.0— (Block Width) —Allow for minimum block width to be less than 200' for blocks with RSLs (18.42.180.C). This requested relaxation is based on the ability to place a building footprint of a reasonable width on a RSL. RSLs are limited to 5000 SF, using a 200' block width, limits RSL to 50' by 100', with 5' side-yard setbacks,building envelope is limited Page 3-15 E-NWG ENGINEERIN . West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5,2004 to 40'. A typical entry level home (1,200 SF)requires a 45' wide by 35' deep building envelope. By using a 180' block width RSL can be 56' by 90' providing a more functional building footprint envelope. Chapter 18.42.180.0—(RSL Area)—Allow for a maximum RSL size of 5,490 SF(6,006 Corner Lots)for detached single-family unit and a maximum lot size of 3,930 for multi-family attached corner lots. This requested relaxation is based on balancing lot size within a block. Chapter 18.44.090.D.3 (Access)—Allow for minimum access distance separation to be reduced for the following proposed streets (distances based on R/W to R/W distance): Oak Street Connections a) Distance between proposed Buckrake and North 27`h Avenue; UDO distance 660', requested relaxation distance 488'. Reduction required matching existing alignment of Buckrake in Harvest Creek Subdivision. ` b) Distance between proposed Buckrake and Hunters;UDO distance 660',requested relaxation distance 540'. Reduction required matching existing alignment of Hunters Way in Harvest Creek Subdivision. c) Distance between proposed Windward Avenue and Hunters Way:UDO distance 660',requested relaxation distance 536'. Reduction required to balance spacing between existing alignment of Hunters Way and New Holland in Harvest Creek • Subdivision Davis Lane Connections a) Distance between proposed Winter Park Street and Tschache Lane; UDO distance 660',requested relaxation distance 590'. Reduction required matching existing alignment of Baxter Meadows accesses. b) Distances between proposed Breeze Lane and Oak Street; UDO distance 660', requested relaxation distance 580'. Reduction required to balance spacing between existing alignment of Oak Street and Baxter Meadows accesses. c) Distance between proposed Winter Park Street and Breeze Lane:UDO distance 660', requested relaxation distance 429'. Reduction required to align with proposed Baxter Meadows access.. Baxter Lane Connections a) Distance between proposed Buckrake and North 27`h Avenue; LIDO distance 660', requested relaxation distance 584'. Reduction required matching existing alignment of Baxter Square access. b) Distances between proposed Windward Avenue and Davis Lane and Hunters Way; UDO distance 660',requested relaxation distance 633' and 476',respectively. Reduction requested to address City Commission concept plan comment to enhance street connectively to Baxter Lane. Page 3-16 ENGINEERING West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5,2004 • Chapter 18.44.090.D.3,Table 44-3, footnote 3 (Access)—Allow residential lots that front on' Hunters Way and Buckrake and back onto the linear park to access local streets within 150' of intersection with arterial. k. Land Use Conflict Mitigation The West community has been designed to minimize land use conflict with surrounding properties. The surrounding land use (see Figure 2.2—Adjoining Land Use Map)is predominately residential with the exception of the adjoining community parks. West Winds is also residential in nature, which will minimize land use conflict. Specific mitigation is proposed within the Design Guidelines that enhances connectivity to the surrounding neighborhoods. This is achieved by requiring perimeter structures that front onto arterials and collectors to present a front style elevation to the arterial or collector street. 1. Statement of Design Methods to Reduce Energy Consumption West Winds has designed the street layout to best connect to surrounding existing subdivisions to the extent possible allowed by code requirements.The West Winds Park has been extended from the south within the Harvest Creek subdivision through the West Winds development. The future extension of Tschache Lane will line up with proposed Tschache Lane within the West Winds development. In addition, there will be bike lanes on Tschache Lane and the perimeter arterial and collector streets to create both north/south and east/west bike lane connections for bicyclists. • m.Development Schedule West Winds is proposed to be a phased PUD per Section 18.36.070(A.)(2.) Application for Approval of Initial Phase of the PUD—With Subsequent Phases Master Planned and Subject to Development Guidelines. The Phase I Subdivision is proposed for construction summer of 2004, final platting fall of 2004. Dependant on market forces subsequent subdivision phases on an annual or bi-annual basis. n.Site Plan Section 18.78.120(B.)(2.)Requires a Site Plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale of not less than 1"=100' be included in the application. Said Site Plan is attached within Appendix C. Page 3-17 ENGINEERING West Winds • Planned Community Phase I Subdivision Preliminary Plat Submittal Concurrent Construction Pursuant to Section 18.74.030(B.)(1.)(a.), of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, it is requested that the Phase I Subdivision of West Winds Planned Community be allowed concurrent building construction with the infrastructure. Specifically,that building permits be allowed prior to completion of the public infrastructure. • 'w • �� • ![ r C i `� {+ t u� i r DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES • 0 West Winds—Design Guidelines March 5, 2004 • Chapter 4 —Development Guidelines Due to the scale, complexity and multi-residential use characteristics of the West Winds Planned Community, the covenants and design guidelines will have a"layered" format. At the core of the covenants and guidelines will be the"Master Covenants and Guidelines" which will be the base document for subsequent sub-association covenants and guidelines that will be prepared with specific subdivision and site plan phases. Section 18.36.070(D.)(2.)Required Development Guidelines for phased PUDs shall be submitted to the Planning Director as part of the application. The following is a item by item listing of the required elements of the Development Guidelines. A draft copy of the "Master Covenants and Guidelines" for West Winds are attached within Part H of the PUD Application. a. A description of submittal requirements and review procedures for the approval of preliminary and final plans submitted in accordance with the master plan and development guidelines (to be developed with the assistance of staff); Section 5.3 Architectural Committee, of the covenants details the proposed review procedures by the Architectural Committee. b. A description of the coordination with any other applicable review procedures, e.g., subdivision review; Coordination with other review procedures will be dependent on the type and scale of the • project. Single-family and townhouse structures will be initially reviewed by the Architectural Committee prior to submittal for building permit. The Architectural committee will provide a comment letter to be included with the building permit application. For larger subdivision and site plan submittals, the applicant will make advisory and pre-application submittals to the City prior to submittal to the Architectural Committee. The intent is to solicit City input prior to formal submittal to the Architectural committee that should reduce redundant review processes. The Architectural committee will provide a comment letter to be included with the subdivision or site plan application. c. A complete list of proposed or potential land uses; Section 4.1 of the Covenants addresses permitted uses. Permitted uses shall be per the approved P.U.D. and R-3 Zoning. d. Sign guidelines: type(s),location, design, illumination, size and height; Section 4.9 of the Covenants addresses signs. Signs shall be in conformance with a P.U.D. Sign Plan to be submitted in conjunction with the Final P.U.D. submittal and the City Sign Code. e. Perimeter buffering guidelines with specific regard to adjoining land uses; Section 5.2 Landscape Elements of the Covenants addresses perimeter buffering. A Master Buffering/Landscape Plan will be prepared in conjunction with the Final P.U.D. • submittal that will be the basis of perimeter buffering. Page 4-1 FN6INEERIN� West Winds—DesignGuidelines • March arc 5, 2004 . f. Landscaping guidelines,including a description of the landscaping theme in relation to the streetscape, the buildings on site, and any proposed signage, open space treatment, parking and circulation areas, display areas and screening; Section 5.2 Landscape Elements of the Covenants addresses landscape guidelines. A Master Buffering/Landscape Plan will be prepared in conjunction with the Final P.U.D. submittal that will be the basis of perimeter buffering, streetscape, site plan landscape, parking and screening. g. Design guidelines for outdoor storage and/or display; Section 5.1.7 Outbuildings of the Covenants addresses storage buildings. h. Protective covenants which may include requirements, property owners association provisions, provisions for maintenance, ect; Part II of the PUD Application Submittal addresses the following items: • Membership and Voting Rights • Maintenance Assessments • Land Use • Architecture • Association Responsibilities • Enforcement i. Parking: guidelines for design, provision for shared facilities, circulation between lots, coordination with sidewalk system, and service areas; Section 4.8 of the Covenants addresses parking. j. Dimensional requirements: building heights, setbacks (interior and perimeter), open space, etc.; Article V Architecture of the Covenants addresses dimensional requirements. k. Lighting; Section 5.2.3 Exterior Lighting of the covenants addresses lighting. 1. Architectural guidelines; Article V Architecture of the Covenants addresses dimensional requirements. m. Provisions for utilities: communications and refuse; Section 4.11 of the covenants addresses utilities. Section 4.4 of the covenants addresses refuse. n. Guidelines for noise, emissions, glare, hazardous materials, etc.; and Article IV Use of the Covenants addresses noise, emissions, glare, hazardous materials o. Improvements schedule Section 5.3.7 of the covenants addresses improvements schedule Page 4-2 E NO IN N� z n 0 - c rlj z z • H r -ti r ,��I`` 'I ja f t j � r ��^ }+� F i ,. r H f z + � �z w � 0 U I R i 1 1� P 1 I '7 if ,. t {ffi 1 i I � , tk �; ��,. • C � l DO° 0 • • i • I �� j I � f I f 1 i 0 • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY P.U.D. Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana This Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY P.U. D. is made this day of March, 2004, by QUEST WEST, LLC, of 125 West Mendenhall, Bozeman, Montana 59715, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant" . RECITALS 1 . Declarant is the owner of the following described property situated in Gallatin County, Montana: 2 . Declarant intends to develop the property described above into a planned unit development, hereinafter to be known as West Winds Planned Community P. U. D. 3 . Declarant desires to subject all of the real property • described above and the lots thereof to protective and restrictive covenants, conditions, restrictions, and reservations herein set forth and referred to as "covenants, " each and all of which shall be for the benefit of the property and lots and the owners thereof, and shall run with the land, applying to and binding the present owners and all future owners and successors in interest. NOW THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, publish, and impose upon the premises, the following protective and restrictive covenants and development guidelines, which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit of all persons claiming such property, their grantors, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, use, and development of the premises, and all improvements placed or erected thereon, unless otherwise specifically excepted herein, and these covenants shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, lot or division. These covenants are as follows : 1 • ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1 . 1 : "Association" shall mean West Winds Owners ' Association, its successors and assigns, unless the context indicates that such reference is in respect to one of the sub- associations to be created within the development, in which case the term shall refer to such sub-association. The Association, or any of the sub-associations, may be incorporated as a Montana non-profit corporation with its members as the lot owners . 1 . 2 : "Member" shall mean any person or entity owning or purchasing a lot in West Winds Subdivision. Each lot owner shall be a member of the main Association, as well as any sub- associations that may be created, and agrees to abide by and be bound by these covenants, and the Articles of Incorporation, By- Laws, and Resolutions of the Association, if any. 1 . 3 : "Owner" shall mean the legal title holders, or contract purchasers, whether one or more persons or entities, owning or purchasing a fee simple title to any lot or portion of a lot, such as the owner of a condominium unit, but excluding those having an interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation; provided, however, that prior to the first conveyance of any lot for value, owner shall mean Declarant . Prior to such conveyance or contract sale, Declarant shall have the right to retain such rights incidental to ownership hereunder as Declarant may desire in its discretion. 1. 4 "Property" shall mean all of the real property described and platted as West Winds Planned Community P. U. D. , according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana . 1 . 5 : "Board, or Board of Directors" shall mean the Board of Directors of West Winds Owners ' Association, which shall consist of not less than three, nor more than seven lot owners, elected on an annual basis by the Members . The Directors shall act on all matters and shall have such powers as shall be reasonably necessary to carry out the purpose of the Association. The Directors shall act by majority vote. • 2 • ARTICLE II MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS 2 . 1 : Each lot owner, including contract purchasers, shall automatically be a member of the Association, upon acquiring an ownership interest in a lot, and the membership in the Association shall be appurtenant to each lot . Each lot owner shall have one vote per lot and, in the event of ownership by more than one person or entity, the owners shall designate one person to be the agent for receiving notices hereunder, and for the purpose of voting. Each . lot owner shall be responsible for advising the Association in writing of their current address and the person designated to vote. The Association shall be deemed to have complied with notice requirements and these covenants by mailing notice to the address of the designated lot owner which is on file in writing with the Association. Once a person is designated to receive notices and cast votes for a particular lot, he or she shall remain in that capacity for as long as he or she owns an interest in that lot, unless the writing designating another person is signed by the person whose name is to be removed. 2 . 2 : It is the intention of the Declarant to incorporate the Association, under the non-profit corporation laws of Montana. The Declarant, as the initial owner of all of the lots within the P. U. D. , shall adopt Bylaws which will govern the activities of the Association. In the event of any conflict between the Association Bylaws and this Declaration, the terms and conditions set forth herein shall prevail. ARTICLE III MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS 3. 1 : Creation of the Lien and Personal Obligation of Assessments : The Declarant, for each lot owned within the P. U. D. , hereby covenants, and each owner of any lot by acceptance of a deed therefore, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association all annual assessments or charges, or special assessments for capital improvements, such assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments, together with interest, costs, and reasonable attorney' s fees, shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each assessment is made. Each assessment, together with interest, 3 • costs, and reasonable attorney' s fees, shall be the personal obligation of the person who is the owner of such property at the time such assessment becomes due. 3 . 2 : Purpose of Assessments : The assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively to promote the recreation, health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the P. U. D. , including appropriate insurance coverage, payment of taxes for common facilities and for the improvement, repair, and maintenance of internal and perimeter buffer landscaping, sidewalks, parks, common areas, storm water detention ponds and perimeter fences of the P. U. D. , in cooperation with adjoining property owners, if required by Montana law, and to promote the enjoyment and living of the members of the Association. In addition, the Developer has initiated the process to form a special improvement lighting district to maintain the street lights within the- P. U. D. . In the event that such a lighting district is not created, the owners within the P.U. D. shall be assessed for such costs through the Association and the Association shall be charged with maintaining the street lights within the P. U. D. . 3 . 3 : Annual Assessments: The amount of the annual assessments shall be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Association and no annual assessments shall be made until the election to do so is made by the Board of Directors . The maximum assessment per lot which may be made by the Association in every calendar year shall not substantially exceed the actual and reasonable cost incurred by the Association in carrying out the purposes herein set forth. 3 . 4 : Special Assessments for Capital Improvements : In addition to the annual assessments authorized above, the Association may levy, in any assessment year, a special assessment applicable to that year only for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement of capital improvements on the property, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, provided that any such assessment shall have the assent of sixty-six and two thirds percent (66 2/30) or more of all of the votes of membership who are present in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for that purpose. 4 • 3 . 5 : Notice and Ouorum of any Action Authorized Under Sections 3 and 4 : Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under these covenants shall be sent to all members not less than ten (10) days nor more than forty (40) days in advance of the meeting. At the first such meeting called for a particular purpose, the presence of members or proxies entitled to cast fifty percent (500) of all the votes of members shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meeting shall be forty percent (400 ) of the membership. No such subsequent meeting shall be held more than sixty ( 60) days following the originally scheduled meeting. 3. 6: Uniform Rate of Assessments : Both annual and special assessments for the members must be fixed on a per lot basis, unless another basis shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Association, utilizing objective criteria to establish the alternate basis . The Board may set different assessments for improved and unimproved lots, provided that all lots within a class are assessed uniformly. 3. 7 : Date of Commencement of Annual Assessments--Due Date: Except as herein provided, the annual and special assessments shall commence as to all lots on the date determined by the Board of Directors; provided, however, that assessments shall be made only upon lots within phases incorporated into the development . The Board of Directors may make smaller assessments for lots upon which no buildings have been constructed, provided that all lots similarly situated are assessed in -the same manner. The Board of Directors shall fix the amount of the annual assessments against each lot at least thirty (30) days in advance of the due date of each annual assessment and ninety (90) days in advance of a special assessment . Written notice of the annual assessments shall be sent to each owner or member subject thereto. The due date of the annual assessments shall be established by the Board of Directors . 3 . 8 : Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments; Remedies of the Association: Any assessment not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date shall bear interest from the past due date at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum, which is the maximum amount allowed by §31-1-107, MCA, at the time of creation of this Declaration. In the event that the maximum amount allowed by §31- 5 1-107, MCA should be raised or lowered by the legislature, the maximum amount that may be .charged on past due assessments shall be raised or lowered accordingly. Any past due assessment on any lot may be recorded at the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana and, from the date of recording, shall be notice of the lien of the assessment to all third parties . The Association may bring an action at law against the owners personally obligated to pay the same or foreclose the lien against the property. No owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by nonuse or abandonment of the lot. 3 . 9 : Sale or Transfer of a Lot: No sale, transfer or encumbrance of any lot shall affect the personal liability of the owner, or the assessment lien if recorded in the records of Gallatin County, except to the extent extinguished by Montana law pertaining to liens, mortgages and trust indentures . No sale or transfer to a third party with actual or constructive knowledge of an assessment shall relieve such lot from the liability for any outstanding assessments or from any assessments thereafter becoming due or from the recorded lien thereof. ARTICLE IV USE 4 . 1 : The property shall be used only for those purposes allowed within an R-3 zoning District within the City of Bozeman, Montana, unless the zoning for any portion of the property is amended through the appropriate procedure. No dumps, commercial dog farms, trash, junk or junked - cars' shall be maintained upon the property, nor shall any noxious or offensive activities be permitted to be done on the property which are a nuisance, or might become a nuisance to the owner or owners of any of the described lands . No lot shall be used in any manner or for any purpose which might endanger the health and safety of the residents of any lots within this property. 1 Defined as any vehicle which is not currently registered or which cannot be readily moved under its own power. It shall be presumeg that any vehicle on jacks or blocks, or which has one or more flat tires, is disabled and is therefore a junk vehicle. 6 4 . 2 : All zoning regulations and all other laws, rules and regulations of any governmental body or agency under whose jurisdiction the land lies are considered to be part of and enforceable hereunder and all the owners of the lands shall be bound by such laws, rules and regulations . In the event that any conflict exists between the applicable zoning laws and the standards set forth herein, the more stringent standards shall apply. 4 . 3 : The owner of each lot shall control the weeds and noxious plants on his lot, as .defined by the Gallatin County Weed Control District and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act; provided, however, that he or she shall not use poison harmful to humans or animals, or detrimental to the enjoyment of the occupants of the property. Should an owner ,fail to properly control the weeds, as required by these covenants and county regulations, the Association may do so on behalf of the owner. In such case, the Association may assess the lot owner for the costs thereof, in the same manner as any regular assessment of the Association. The Association shall bear the responsibility for weed control upon any common areas and the Association shall be subject to the same responsibilities and restrictions as are set forth for individual property owners above. 4 . 4 : No junk, garbage, trash, slash, debris, or other waste shall be allowed to permanently accumulate on any lot (any temporary accumulation shall be kept in sanitary containers screened from view by appropriate fencing) , and shall be disposed of regularly. All waste material, except that which may be cleanly and efficiently disposed of through the use of sanitary sewer systems, shall be placed in appropriate receptacles and regularly removed by a regulated trash hauler . 4 . 5 : All dogs, cats and other pets shall be strictly controlled by their owners so as not to annoy or interfere with the use of the area by the other owners and to prevent any interference or harassment of other animals in the P.U. D. or on surrounding or adjacent properties . The keeping of dogs, cats or other pets shall be in strict compliance with any and all applicable rules and regulations adopted by the City of Bozeman, and no more than two dogs may be kept on any lot; except that more than two puppies .may be kept until they are weaned. All dogs must be in a kennel or on a leash at all times, or in a fenced yard. Pets are not allowed to roam free. 7 4 . 6: These restrictions, conditions, and limitations shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the present owners and all subsequent owners of any portion of the area included within the aforesaid plat . The grantee of any portion of the property covenants and agrees by the acceptance of a conveyance, faithfully to observe and comply with the restrictions, conditions, and limitations applicable thereof. 4 . 7 : Any provisions herein may be enforced by any owner of any portion of the area included within the plat, including all phases incorporated after the recording of these Covenants, the Association, or by the developer, either by an action for damages arising out of a violation, or by an action to restrain continuing violation or in any other manner permitted by law. In any action of any kind for the enforcement of these restrictions, if the relief prayed for is granted in whole or in part, the applicant for relief shall be entitled to recover necessary costs of the action, including attorney' s fees . 4 . 8 : A ten (10) foot utility easement is reserved unto Declarant, the Association, and any necessary utility company, as well as their successors and assigns, along either side of any lot line which separates two lots within the P.U . D. , and a twelve (12) foot utility easement is reserved along any lot line which is not common to another lot within the P. U. D. . In addition, should a common driveway or parking area straddle the boundary lines of two lots, each owner sharing such driveway or parking area shall have an easement over and across the property of the other to the boundary of such driveway or parking area. Such easement shall not, however, allow an owner to utilize more of the driveway or parking area than necessary and shall not be construed. to grant to such owner additional parking spaces beyond that which is allotted to him/her. 4 . 9: All signage shall be in conformance the "West Winds Planned Community Sign Plan. " No signs, other than allowed subdivision identification signs, shall be erected upon any residential lot within the P. U. D. , except a discreet "For Sale" sign which shall be allowed upon any lot being sold. All signs appurtenant to residential principal and conditional uses and home occupations shall be in compliance with the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 8 4 . 10 : Lot owners and residents of the P.U. D. are informed that uses of nearby lands may be agricultural . Lot owners accept and are aware that standard agricultural' and farming practices can result in dust, animal odors, flies, burning, smoke, and machinery noise. Standard agricultural practices feature the use of heavy equipment, chemical sprays and the use of machinery early in the morning and sometimes late into the evening. 4 . 11 : Electricity, natural gas, and telephone primary service lines shall be brought to each lot by the developer. Each lot owner is responsible for the cost of bringing electricity, natural gas, and telephone services to his/her residence from the primary line across his/her lot, including any additions to the primary line which may be required by location of the improvements on the lot. All utilities shall be underground. 4 . 12 : As set forth in the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, no buildings may be placed within the required fifty foot (50 ' ) setback from the ordinary high water mark of any watercourse flowing through the property. 4 . 13 : All common areas, including parks not dedicated to the City of Bozeman, shall be perpetually reserved for use by the Association and its individual members upon such reasonable terms and conditions as the Association may impose. ARTICLE V ARCHITECTURE 5 .1 MINIMUM BUILDING STANDARDS 5 . 1 . 1 : General : Only uses allowed within an R-3 zoning district shall be allowed within the property and the Declarant may file amendments with each phase of the development to further define the uses within each phase. 5 . 1 . 2 : Buildinci Size and Height : No structure may be constructed within the P .U. D. which does not comply with the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The Declarant shall, with each phase of the development, prepare and publish design standards for the structures within each phase of the development, which shall include guidelines for size and height of structures within each phase. Approval of size and height 9 shall take into consideration unusual designs, views, and solar effects of existing structures, and variances from the above stated square footage requirements may be granted for innovative designs, but no building shall be allowed which unreasonably blocks the view or light of a neighboring building, nor may any building be constructed that violates City code. 5 . 1 . 3 : New Construction Required: All buildings located upon any lot within the P.U. D. shall be of new construction and no mobile homes or trailer homes, including doublewide mobile homes or modular homes, or like or similar dwellings, shall be allowed upon the property. 5 . 1 . 4 : Siding and Trim: The exterior siding of the structure shall consist of wood, wood look-alikes or wood products, brick, stone, stucco or other manufactured materials of good quality, including insulated metal siding. Sheet or panel metal siding, T-111 siding, plywood sheet siding, and concrete block siding is prohibited. Roof fascia trim on any structure constructed on the property shall extend downward on the roof and be visible for at least six inches . Muted and subdued colors drawn from the surrounding environment, such as the earth tones of summer and fall, should dominate the main body of the building. The trim should accent or contrast the main body, adding visual interest to the predominant neutral tones . 5 . 1 . 5: Roofs : Roof design shall incorporate a pitch of at least 5/12 and should be consistent with building size, shape, and form. Solar collectors and skylights should appear to be part of the overall roof design and must be placed flush with the slope of the roof or integrated into the design of the roof. Flat and domed roofs are prohibited. Roofing materials must meet twenty-five (25) year life architectural design requirements. Standing seam metal roofs and T-lock shingles shall be allowed if of good quality and are visually appealing. Muted and subdued colors should be chosen to harmonize with the surrounding color schemes . 5 . 1 . 6: Fireplaces, Chimneys, and Flues: Only those wood burning devices allowed by law shall be utilized in the development and any such wood burning devices shall be designed to avoi8 smoke and fumes at ground levels during down-slope wind. Chimneys must be clad with natural stone, stucco, brick or wood 10 enclosures . A choice of materials that match the dwelling is encouraged for chimneys that extend more than three (3) feet above the roof surface or line. 5 . 1 . 7 : Outbuildings : All plans for outbuildings, including detached garages that are constructed subsequent to the main dwelling, are subject to review and approval and must conform to the standards set forth in these Covenants, as well as all building and zoning ordinances of the City of Bozeman. Placement on the lot should give consideration to enhancing the appearance of the P. U. D. . 5 . 1 . 8 : Antennas/Satellite Dishes should be positioned in unobtrusive locations with consideration given to local esthetics and views from adjacent properties . Satellite dishes within the P.U. D. shall not exceed eighteen (18) inches in diameter. 5 . 1 . 9: Animal Kennels must be set back at least as far from the lot lines as any building erected on the lot, and shall be placed in an area which is inconspicuous and removed from the direct view of neighbors and the street in front of the house. 5 . 1 . 10 : Architectural Enhancement : All buildings constructed within the P. U. D. shall be designed, located and constructed in such a manner as to create an esthetically pleasing environment . 5.2 : LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 5 . 2 . 1 : General : 5. 2 . 1 . 1 Single-Family / Townhouse Residential General : There shall be a landscape plan submitted and approved for each residence prior to the time that such residence is occupied. The residential landscape plan will be in compliance with the "West Winds Planned Community Master Landscape Plan / Guidelines. " Each landscaping plan shall provide, at a minimum, that graded areas must be smoothed and seeded and any trees required by the City of Bozeman shall be planted. Planting of other trees and shrubs is encouraged, as is construction of an underground sprinkler system for each lot . The landscaping for each residence must be completed within twelve (12) months after the first occupancy of the residential structure (s) . 11 FENCES 5 . 2 . 1 . 1 Multi-Family Residential General : There shall be a landscape plan submitted and approved for each multi-family area in conjunction with review submittal ' to the Architectural Committee. The multi-family residential landscape plan will be in compliance with the "West Winds Planned Community Master Landscape Plan / Guidelines" Each landscaping plan shall provide, at a minimum, that graded areas must be smoothed and seeded and any trees required by the City of Bozeman shall be planted. Planting of other trees and shrubs is encouraged, as is construction of an underground sprinkler system for each area. The landscaping for each area must be completed within six (6) months after the first occupancy of the residential structure (s) (weather permitting) . 5 . 2 . 2 : Fences/Privacy Screens : Fences may be constructed as allowed by the City of Bozeman, provided that any fence shall be constructed in . a manner that not only provides screening or security, but is also visually appealing. In that regard, wood, wood look-alike materials, brick, stone and wrought iron shall be considered. Natural wood colors and stains for the preservation of fences and screens are recommended. In no event shall fences or privacy screens be constructed of chain link or wire materials . 5 . 2 . 3 : Exterior Lighting: The Developer will install street lighting in accordance with lighting plans to be prepared with each subdivision phase or site plan. Each Owner may install free standing decorative lights, which shall not exceed eight (8 ) feet in height . Incandescent lighting is encouraged and the use of mercury vapor, halogen, and obtrusive flood lighting is prohibited. 5 .3 . ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE: 5 . 3 . 1 : The West Winds Architectural Committee, hereafter referred to as the "Committee" or the "Architectural Committee" shall oversee all construction within the P. U . D. The Committee shall be appointed by the Developer of the P. U . D. and shall initially consist of at least one, but no more than three persons with expertise in building or landscape design or construction practices . The persons comprising the Architectural Committee shall be persons with backgrounds 'in the construction industry, such as` architect or general contractors . All decisions of the Committee shall be by majority vote. At any time after the third 12 phase is incorporated into the development, the Developer may, at the Developer's sole discretion, turn over control of the Architectural Committee to the Association. In the event that control is turned over to the Association, the Association may determine the size of the Architectural Committee and the qualifications of its members, provided that the Committee members continue to adhere to the development standards applicable to each phase. 5 . 3 .2 : The Committee may make such reasonable rules and by- laws and adopt such procedures as it deems necessary to carry out its functions, which rules, by-laws, and procedures may not be inconsistent with the provisions of these covenants. Such rules shall only be effective upon their publication and notice to each owner, and shall not be applied retroactively to affect any previously approved design. 5 . 3 . 3 : No building, construction, reconstruction, alteration, remodeling, landscaping, parking, fence, wall or other improvement shall be placed, constructed, erected, repaired, restored, reconstructed, altered, remodeled, added to or maintained on any lot or tract until building drawings, plans and specifications, and such other information as the Committee may reasonably require, including, but not limited to, colors, building materials and models, have been submitted to, and approved by, a majority of the Committee in writing; nor may the same be commenced until the Committee shall have issued a permit allowing for such improvements . In the event that the Committee fails to act upon any submittal within days of the date that such submittal is made, the plans so submitted shall be deemed approved. 5 . 3 . 3 . 1 : Coordination with other review jurisdictions shall be the responsibility of the applicant. Single-family and townhouse structures will be initially reviewed by the Architectural Committee prior to submittal for building permit . The Architectural Committee will provide a comment/compliance letter to be included by the applicant with building permit application to the City. For subdivision and site plan submittals the applicant will make advisory and pre-application submittals to the City prior to submittal to the Architectural Committee. The Architectural Committee will provide a comment/compliance letter to be included by the applicant with the subdivision or site plan application to the City. 13 • 5 . 3 . 4 : The Committee . shall require all construction to comply with the provisions of the following standard codes or their amendments and owner will be responsible for complying with same: "Uniform Building Code" International Conference of Building Officials "National Plumbing Code" "National Electrical Code" National Fire Protective Association In addition, all construction shall comply with the . building requirements of the City of Bozeman, including setback requirements . 5 . 3 . 5 : The Committee shall have the authority to reject materials, designs and colors submitted with plans or the plans themselves if they are not compatible, or are inappropriate, with the rest of the P.U. D. or the master plan, provided that such rejection is based upon objective criteria, in accordance with • these covenants and any subsequent standards developed by the Committee. 5. 3 . 6: The Committee shall have the authority to grant variances to the provisions contained in these Covenants where, in its discretion, it believes the same to be necessary and where the same will not be injurious to the rest of the properties bound by these covenants : 5 . 3 . 7 : All improvements, construction, reconstruction, alterations, remodeling or any activity requiring the approval of the Committee must be in substantial compliance with the plans and specifications initially approved by the Committee. Upon approval by the Committee, and receipt of all appropriate State, Local and Federal permits, the applicant shall proceed with the timely completion of the project. The project shall be brought to substantially completion including installation of exterior landscaping and hardscape within a schedule typical to industry standard for the type and scale of the project . 14 • 5 . 3 . 8 : The Committee shall have the power, authority, standing and right to enforce these covenants in any court of law or equity when it reasonably believes the same have been violated. 5 . 3 . 9 : The Committee may require reasonable fees to be paid with the filing of plans and specifications and the issuance of building permits to defray its expenses . The Committee shall publish a fee schedule periodically and no fee in excess of the published rate may be charged. The initial fee to be charged shall be $ , but may be increased by the Developer or the Committee upon 15 days notice to the affected owners . For each subsequent review of a design that has been approved once, and is unchanged other than cosmetics, such as color schemes, the fee shall be $ 5 . 3 . 10 : The Committee shall be governed by the following guidelines in its consideration of plans and specifications submitted for its approval : a. It must recognize that all improvements must harmoniously combine, and not be inconsistent with, the development of the entire project so as to maintain a uniformity of value and quality, but this provision shall not be construed to require uniformity of design. b. In considering any plans and specifications, the Committee shall examine the suitability of the same to the site,. including the materials of which it is to be constructed, as well as the relationship of the same to the neighborhood and the adjacent properties . C. No plans or specifications shall be approved which will be so similar or dissimilar to other improvements or structures that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. d. All plans and specifications shall be in full compliance with all of the terms and provisions of these covenants, except for any variances, which may have been granted by the Committee for such plans and specifications . 15 5 . 3 . 11 : The Committee or the individual members thereof may not be held liable by any person for any damages which may result from Committee action . taken pursuant to these covenants, including but not by way of limitation, damages which may result from correction, amendment, change or rejection of plans, the issuance of building permits or any delays associated with such action on the part of the Committee. ARTICLE VI ASSOCIATION RESPONSIBILITIES 6. 1 : The Association shall be responsible for the maintenance, reconstruction, repair, and replacement for all sidewalks within common areas of the P. U. D. over which the Association has responsibility. 6. 2 : The Association shall be responsible for all maintenance of all park areas and other common spaces within the P.U . D. , including trees required to be planted as a condition of P. U. D. approval. 6. 3 : The Association shall be responsible for maintaining any fences owned by the Association bordering lands outside the P. U. D. . 6. 4 : The Association shall be responsible for the maintenance, reconstruction, repair, replacement of any common drainage detention or control areas depicted on the attached drainage plan— The Association shall, either directly, or through employees or contractors, maintain all onsite storm water collection, detention and discharge release facilities shown on the attached drainage plan. The Association shall conduct routine inspections to ensure that debris, yard waste and ice does not impede operation of the detention ponds and discharge structures . These inspections shall take place after each major runoff, but not less than once per quarter, throughout the year. A record of all such inspections shall be made and kept on file and shall be made available, upon request, to regulatory agencies . In addition to monthly inspections, an annual assessment of the detention ponds and release structures shall be made and all deficiencies shall be corrected. Accumulations of sediment and debris in the detention ponds and release structures shall be 16 measured and vandalism and weather damage shall be assessed and repaired. Detention ponds shall be mowed on a regular basis during the growing season so as to remain free of vegetation that might impede their storage capacity. 6. 5 : The Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of the community center, as well as for its management, including the promulgation of rules and regulations for its use. ARTICLE VII DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7 . 1 : The West Winds Planned Community P. U. D. shall be developed in phases, with no set schedule for completion. As each new phase is included in the development, the Developer shall file addenda or amendments to these Covenants, as necessary, provided that such amendments or addenda are consistent with the spirit of these Covenants. Each owner and each holder of a mortgage or trust indenture on any property within the P.U. D. , by acceptance of the deed or security instrument, hereby consents to all such amendments and grants unto the Developer, as well as its • successors and assigns, a limited irrevocable power of attorney, coupled with an interest, to amend this Declaration in accordance with this plan of development . 7 . 2 : That in the event that the zoning for any portion of the P.U. D changes prior to development of that portion of the property, the Developer may include additional provisions for that portion of the property consistent with the change in the zoning designation. ARTICLE VIII TERM, ENFORCEMENT, APPLICABILITY AND CHANGE 8 . 1 : These Restrictive Covenants shall remain in full force and effect until revocation or amendment upon an affirmative vote by at least 750 of the owners within the P.U . D. ; provided, however, that any covenant which is required as a condition of plat approval may not be revoked or amended without the prior written consent of the Bozeman City Commission or any other appropriate governing body charged with the administration or enforcement of such condition. Each owner shall have one vote 17 per lot, and the Covenants and Conditions herein contained are to run with the land, until so revoked. 8 . 2 : Enforcement of these covenants shall be by proceedings either at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant; and the legal proceedings may be either to restrain violation of the covenants or to recover damages, or both. In the event of any action to enforce these covenants, including an action to collect unpaid assessments, through foreclosure or otherwise, the prevailing party shall be entitled - to costs and reasonable attorney' s fees to be set by the court . Any lot owner, Declarant, or the Association may enforce these covenants. 8 . 3 : Any failure by the Declarant hereto, or of any subsequent lot owner, to enforce any Covenant or Restriction contained herein, shall in no event be deemed a waiver or in any way prejudice the rights to enforce that Covenant or any other Covenant thereafter, or to collect damages for any subsequent breach of these covenants. 8 . 4 : Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other covenants • or provisions, all of which shall remain in full force and effect. 8 . 5 : In any conveyance of the above-described real property or of any tract thereon, it shall be sufficient to insert a provision in any deed or conveyance to the effect that the property is subject to the Restrictions and covenants herein contained, without setting forth such restrictions and covenants verbatim or in substance in the deed. All of the above-described real property and lots shall be subject to the restrictions and covenants set forth, whether or not there is a reference to the same in a deed or conveyance. 8 . 6: A breach of any of the foregoing restrictions or covenants shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value upon any tract or portion of the real property or any improvements thereon. However, the said restrictions and covenants shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any subsequent owner whose title thereto was acquired by foreclosure, trustee sale or otherwise. 18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, John Dunlap, the representative of Quest West, L. L.C. charged with the responsibility of creating and recording these Restrictive Covenants, has hereunto set his hand this day of March, 2004 . QUEST WEST, L.L.C. JOHN DUNLAP, Representative STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss County of Gallatin ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of March, 2004, by JOHN DUNLAP, Representative of QUEST WEST, L.L. C. Notary Public for the State of Montana Printed name: Residing at Montana My Commission Expires : 19 ","F F 1 4' 1 ..Y-"y t f ��- _ _ � _ I`- ���;. 4 ' - ��� �. � 1 �' �' �� � ` 1 �� i� , � � �. O 0 ��0 II � ® �� �. 1 i I f i I !1 I I ,' i !�� ', i a i I a I� 1 �:. �� ��i �I 'E ;� ��i �I �! �� q,� • �' ;:� �� i ' ;� ,. ,�,� �i r,� i X �1. q� I III PART III—WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PHASE I SUBDIVISION • PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 18.78.040 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT.................................................1 A. Pre-application Information ......................................................................................................I 1. Sketch Map.....................................................................................................................1 2. Topographic Features....................................................................................................1 3. Utilities...........................................................................................................................I 4. Subdivision Layout ........................... .........................................................................l 5. Development Plan...........................................................................................................1 6. Name and Location........................................................................................................1 7. Notations........................................................................................................................1 8. Variances .......................................................................................................................2 9. Waivers..........................................................................................................................2 B. Subdivision Information ...........................................................................................................2 C. Streets, Roads, and Grades........................................................................................................2 D. Adjoining Subdivisions.............................................................................................................2 E. Adjoining Owners......................................................................................................................2 F. Perimeter Survey........................................................................................................................2 G. Section Corners .........................................................................................................................2 • H. Phased Improvements................................................................................................................2 I. Contours......................................................................................................................................2 J. Waivers.......................................................................................................................................2 K. Request for MDEQ Exemption.................................................................................................2 SECTION 18.78.050 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUPPLEMENTS REQUIRED FOR ALL SUBDIVISIONS............................................................................................................................2 A. Area Map...................................................................................................................................2 B. Subdivision Map .......................................................................................................................2 C. Variances ..................................................................................................................................2 D. Property Owners .......................................................................................................................2 E. Documents and Certificates.......................................................................................................2 F. Street Profiles ............................................................................................................................2 G. Application and Fee...................................................................................................................2 H. Noxious Weed...........................................................................................................................2 SECTION 18.78.060 ADDITIONAL SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT SUPPLEMENTS...........................................................................................................................2 A. Surface Water ...........................................................................................................................2 1. Mapping .........................................................................................................................2 2. Description.....................................................................................................................2 3. Water Body Alteration...................................................................................................2 4. Wetlands.........................................................................................................................2 5. Permits............................................................................................................................3 Page i E NOINEEEIN� PART III—WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PHASE I SUBDIVISION • PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT'D Page B. Floodplains ................................................................................................................................3 C. Groundwater .............................................................................................................................3 D. Geology—Soils—Slopes...........................................................................................................3 1. Geologic Hazards...........................................................................................................3 2. Protective Measures.......................................................................................................3 3. Unusual Features............................................................................................................3 4. Soils Map........................................................................................................................3 5. Cuts &Fills....................................................................................................................3 E. Vegetation..................................................................................................................................3 1. Vegetation Map..............................................................................................................3 2. Protective Measures.......................................................................................................3 F. Wildlife......................................................................................................................................3 1. Species............................................................................................................................3 2. Critical Areas..................................................................................................................3 3. Pets/Human Activity....................................................................................................3 4. Public Access .................................................................................................................3 5. Protective Measures.......................................................................................................3 6. FWP................................................................................................................................3 • G. Historical Features ....................................................................................................................3 1. Affected Areas................................................................................................................3 H. Agriculture..................................................................................................................................4 I. Agricultural Water Use Facilities ...............................................................................................4 J. Water& Sewer ..........................................................................................................................4 K. Stormwater Management..........................................................................................................4 L. Streets,Roads, and Alleys .........................................................................................................4 1. Description.....................................................................................................................4 2. Access to Arterial...........................................................................................................4 3. Modifications of Existing Streets, Roads, and Alleys....................................................4 4. Dust................................................................................................................................4 5. Erosion Control .............................................................................................................4 6. Traffic Generation..........................................................................................................4 7. Capacity .........................................................................................................................4 8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Pathways,Lanes, and Routes ...................................................4 9. Traffic Calming..............................................................................................................4 M. Utilities .....................................................................................................................................4 N. Educational Facilities................................................................................................................4 0. Land Use....................................................................................................................................4 P. Parks and Recreation Facilities..................................................................................................4 Q. Neighborhood Center Plan........................................................................................................4 R. Lighting Plan.............................................................................................................................4 • d. UDO Compliance..................................................................................................................3-2 Page ii E NO IN E E EIN� PART III—WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY PHASE I SUBDIVISION • PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT'D APPENDIXES Appendix SD-1 Preliminary Plat Appendix SD-2 USGS Map Appendix SD-3 Area Map Appendix SD-4 Reduce Plat Map Appendix SD-5 Adjoining Property Owners List Appendix SD-6 Preliminary Plat Certificate Appendix SD-7 Subdivision Application Appendix SD-8 Lighting Plan Appendix SD-9 Request for Concurrent Construction • Page iii L■ ENGINE N� West Winds Planned Community -- Phase I Subdivision • Preliminary Plat Application The following is a detailed listing of the Preliminary Plat Submittal requirements for West Winds Phase I Subdivision per Section 18.78.00 of the UDO. This preliminary plat submittal is made in conjunction with the West Winds Planned Community Planned Unit Development(PUD) submittal. West Winds Phase I Subdivision has been designed in compliance with the environmental/engineering documents, UDO compliance,Covenants and Design Guidelines of the West Winds Planned Community PUD. Section 18.78.040 Subdivision Preliminary Plat The following is a detailed listing of the Preliminary Plat Submittal requirements for West Winds Phase I Subdivision per Section 18.78.00 of the UDO. The intent of the following outline is to direct the review agency to the location of required plat information within the PUD application. A. Pre-application Information per Section 18.78.030 of the UDO. 1. Sketch Map. a. The names of adjoining subdivisions are shown on the Preliminary Plat Map within appendix "SD-1" of this application. b. Road names, locations,easements and adjoining easements are shown on the Preliminary Plat Map. c. No structures are within the Phase I Preliminary Plat boundary. • d. Zoning classifications are shown on the Preliminary Plat Map 2. Topographic Features a. A USGS map of the planning area is included in appendix "SD-2" of this application. b. See the following PUD figures and appendices for specific land feature information: a. Figure 5.2 -- Water Features b. Appendix F—West Winds Community Wetlands Delineation Report c. Figure 5.4—Vegetation Map d. Appendix H—Noxious Weed Management and Re- Vegetation Plan 3. Utilities -- See the following figures. Sections and appendices for utility information: a. Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities b. Figure 6.1 —Water System Plan c. Figure 6.2—Sanitary Sewer Plan d. Figure 6.3 —Storm Water Plan 4. Subdivision Layout—See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". 5. Development Plan—see Figure 2.4—Project Phasing Diagram in PUD application. 6. Name and Location - See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". • 7. Notations --See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". Page 1 of 4 ENGINEEEING West Winds—Phase I Subdition Preliminary Plat Application • March 5, 2004 8. Variances—See PUD Chapter 3, Section j. Requested Relaxations from UDO. • 9. Waivers—NA B. Subdivision Information -- See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". C. Streets,Roads and Grades -- See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". D. Adjoining Subdivisions -- See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". E. Adjoining Owners -- See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". F. Perimeter Survey -- See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". G. Section Corners -- See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". H. Phased Improvements—NA 1. Contours -- See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1". J. Waivers—No waivers requested or granted during pre-application process. K. Request for MDEO Exemption—Exemption will not be requested. Section 18.78.050 Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions A. Area Man -- See appendix "SD-3"for area map. B. Subdivision Man—See appendix "SD-4"for reduced plat map. C. Variances -- See PUD Chapter 3, Section j. Requested Relaxations from UDO. D. Property Owners—See appendix "SD-5"for a certified list of property owners. E. Documents and Certificates 1. See covenants,restrictions, articles of incorporation and design guidelines section of PUD Application. 2. Encroachment Permit or letter not required. Proposed roads will connect to City • streets and will be reviewed by City Engineering Department. 3. No zoning change requested. 4. See Preliminary Plat Map in appendix "SD-1"for plat certificates. 5. See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities and PUD appendix "M— . Park Plan" for maintenance provisions. F. Street Profiles—NA, street grades less than 5% G. Application and Fee—See appendix "SD-7"for application H. Noxious Weed-- See PUD Appendix H—Noxious Weed Management and Re- Vegetation Plan. Section 18.78.060 Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements A. Surface Water 1. Ma in —See PUD Figure 5.2 --Water Features a. No natural water features on site. Existing water features excavated irrigation ditches. b. Irrigation ditches shown on PUD Figure 5.2--Water Features. 2. Description—see PUD Chapter 5—Master Environmental Document, subsection c. Hydrology. 3. Water Body Alteration -- see PUD Chapter 5—Master Environmental Document, subsection c. Hydrology. 4. Wetlands—See PUD Appendix F—West Winds Community Wetlands Delineation • Report. Page 2 of 4 E N G IN E E E IE E E I N� West Winds—Phase I Subcsion Preliminary Plat Application • March 5, 2004 5. Permits -See PUD Appendix F—West Winds Community Wetlands Delineation • Report for COE correspondence. B. Floodplains—No floodplains in close proximity to project. C. Groundwater 1. See PUD Appendix G—Groundwater Investigation Report. 2. See PUD Appendix G—Groundwater Investigation Report. D. Geology—Soils—Slopes 1. Geologic Hazards - See the following documents: a. PUD Appendix D—Geotechnical Investigation Report for West Winds Planned Community. b. Chapter 5 —Master Environmental Document, Section a. Landforms, Slope and Topography c. Chapter 5 —Master Environmental Document, Section b. Geology d. Chapter 5 —Master Environmental Document,Section g. Soils e. PUD Appendix G—Groundwater Investigation Report for West Winds Planned Community 2. Protective Measures—See documents listed directly above. 3. Unusual Features—See PUD Appendix D—Geotechnical Investigation Report for West Winds Planned Community. 4. Soils Man—See PUD Figure 5.3 —NRCS Soils Map. 5. Cuts &Fills—The project site has gentle slopes ranging from 1%-3%. No cuts or fills greater than 3' are anticipated. E. Vegetation. • 1. Vegetation Map—See the following documents: a. See PUD Appendix F—West Winds Community Wetlands Delineation Report. b. PUD Figure 5.4—Vegetation Map c. Chapter 5 —Master Environmental Document, Section f. Vegetation 2. Protective Measures—See items listed directly above. F. Wildlife. 1. Species—See Chapter 5 —Master Environmental Document, Section g. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat. 2. Critical Areas—No wildlife critical areas within planning area, See Chapter 5 — Master Environmental Document, Section g. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat. 3. Pets/Human Activity—Planning area is currently frequented by adjoining neighborhood owners with pets. No impacts to wildlife anticipated, See Chapter 5— Master Environmental Document,Section g.Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat. 4. Public Access—The planning area is currently private property with no public access. West Winds Park will provide extension public access. See PUD Chapter 6— Community Facilities,Utilities and Parks, Section f. Parks. 5. Protective Measures—Wildlife areas are preserved within West Winds Park. See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities, Utilities and Parks, Section f. Parks. 6. FWP—See PUD Appendix A -Service Provider Letters for FWP correspondence. G. Historical Features 1. Affected Areas—No historic features within planning area,See PUD Appendix A - Service Provider Letters. • Page 3 of 4 E E140INEEEIN West Winds—Phase I Subdi4on Preliminary Plat Application • March 5, 2004 H. Agriculture—For items 1 through 6 see Chapter 5 —Master Environmental Document, Section e. Vegetation. 1. Agricultural Water User Facilities --For items 1 through 3 see Chapter 5—Master Environmental Document, Section c. Hydrology. J. Water&Sewer—See PUD Appendices; 1. Appendix J—Water System Report 2. Appendix K—Sanitary.Sewer System Report K. Stormwater Mana eg_ment—Items 1 through 3 see PUD Appendix E—Stormwater Investigation Report for West Winds Planned Community. L. Streets. Roads and Alleys 1. Description - See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section d. Roads and PUD Appendix I—Road Sections. 2. Access to Arterial - See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section d. Roads 3. Modifications of.Existing Streets,roads or Alleys -See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section d. Roads and PUD Appendix I—Road Sections. 4. Dust—No alleys proposed in project. 5. Erosion Control -- See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section d. Roads 6. Traffic Generation—See PUD A Appendix L—Traffic Report 7. Capacity—See PUD A Appendix L—Traffic Report 8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Pathways, Lanes and Routes- See PUD Chapter 6— Community Facilities and Utilities, Section d.Roads, Section f.Parks and PUD • Appendix I—Road Sections. 9. Traffic Calming- See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section d. Roads. M. Utilities—Copies of the proposed planned community has been supplied to utility providers. See PUD Appendix A - Service Provider Letters for correspondence. Also, see PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities N. Educational Facilities—A copy of the proposed planned community was sent to the Bozeman School District. See PUD Appendix A- Service Provider Letters for correspondence. Also, see PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section h. Schools. 0. Land Use—See the following items: 1. PUD Chapter 2—Background and Overview, Section e. Land Use and Density 2. Figure 2.1 Land Use Diagram 3. PUD Chapter 3 —UDO Document Requirements P. Parks and Recreation Facilities -- See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section f. Parks and PUD A Appendix M—Park Plan Q. Neighborhood Center Plan -- See PUD Chapter 6—Community Facilities and Utilities, Section f. Parks and PUD A Appendix N—Neighborhood Center Plan R. Lighting Plan—See Appendix SD-8 Lighting Plan • Page 4 of 4 ENO IN E E R IN�"� o� i Y Q x U) V 1 A P P PRELIM INARY PLAT N D I X S . D • 1 s • �• • a cd 10 • • Baxter Lane _ 1 ._._... _..,._ ✓�. • ', PAP.._ I f�P s 1 m f c f � X o . s I Z ti � a �Durstan Road s ` Iyl a + + •, s s • ` s r Id t a • ' � a + � � 71 ,1 ,=��S • . . WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.S.E., P.M.M. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTA_NA • �NOIN�RRIMO _N_ HKM Engheedng Inc. USGS TOPO GRA PH Y McChesney Professional Bldg. 601 Res Dr.,sine 2 MAP Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)586.8834 500 0 500 FIGURE SO-2 FAX(406)586-1730 b ad$ INt DAM FM.28.20M PROJECT N0.0�5067.1f0 C.X*t 0 2004 1001 Englnwtnq Ina.A0 Rlghb Rewvwd. - • • f 1 I i f I ! I ,ill I I III lil I — ,II I I III III III I i I I ICI �II III I �? III �Ily I c, � I o•y, � - I Z 19y9 — \'�' Q IIF"4:rrr_ irC•:i=-_ �t I I. O 5. .^.4:. 4 QI I I-.F'1'•�..rrCL•tTS"� I � I!I .ti NI I I--— c I I a' I I ^,'pP`tEp I i I ' ,'=i'•''�1 - ::;;,, (I -..-`V_ — •BAXTERLANE IU,N "•v� "i.d: ;OHED _ as R:. �;.. L,Aj. H ! it I! ~ _L-- JJJ_ -- IAL'S'. C/PAL—ARM I 7 --- — — — — --- - ------- -- ------------ CENTER_- -- -=— - - III 1 cexreR oc�.a l ii I� C,yl IIFI � 1 3 a d en d N LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y PR OPOSED Tk rsI ROADa sPo1T Q OF WAY NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.S.E., P.M.M. PROPOSED EASE1ENT GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PROPOSED LOT LNE ENGINEERING ----- PROPOSED ROAD CENTERUNE 0 DOS11NG KTlANDS -N- M Engineering Inc. cChesney Professional Bldg. AREA MAP b 601 Nikles Dr.,Suite 2 a Bozeman,MT 59715 9 (406)586.8834 ,00 D ,00 FIGURE SD-3 ' FAX(406)5861730 [ DATE FEEL?7,2004 PROJECT NM 04SM7.110 Copylot 0 2004 HI01 Engineering Inc,AU Rights Reserved • PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE 0 • WEST WINDS MAJOR SUBDIVISION PHASE IA & IB, SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PURPOSE OF SURVEY: TO CREATE PARCELS FOR FOR PHASE DEVELOPMENT. i (Irr) LOOT LOT B �O T 1 R=269.28 e t (Ra) "e/ IIfIi 1I I 91, L I aI LOT T - _ ---L=110.21 7B5.89 b N '21" -' I YQs3'e 0.T0A0"T nA=23'26'58"i ' t\w I / 83 16' PHASE IA BOUNDARY EASEMEN,TN88122 7916' -N- BREEZE LANE m g 6 , / / i 60 0 60 120 \ 829 / / , , / I I �\ $ r---------_ I � mm nm i scale feet LOT 1 LOT I I , LOT 30 1= r_____________ I \ I\ ?.ioi.o-� I �al..ax I / !I LOT I SCALE Y = 60' \ I I 1\ r.me on. !(RSU / i LOT 28 I zeao.ax. I a I 1 yam I.Rem) \ \ ( I I I LOT 2 I LOrT 17 I 80.00, I / I LOT 28 1 ; I ELECTRICAL LEGEND. gam-11 I 10.00' e.� ofL EASEMENT UTI Iry I I LOT 2 2.aea ox. I I I I (R)RECORD 13EAPoNG AND DISTANCE WEST s\ I EN I—I 9 I—-It I ((a) I� so.00' I I i \ I ,,, 1 1(TYP)„em 1 7 1 ( ) I LOT (M)MEASURED BEAwNc AND DISTANCE \ PARK�x r r I I LOT 3 I (--\ I I // I 4m 1 ;(«i`m IL (RS.)RESTRICTED SIZE LOT \ I LOT tl1 ` I g I I O -1/Z-REBAR AND PLASTIC CAP.SET FOR \, 6 I a,sT,on. I LOT 18 1 r c a.7sa l a LOT 3 I 2.E san. I g I �l,'�" / D;, 6 1 5,.co ox.ICI (Ra) I A I i THIS SURVEY MARKED'J.COEREL 1w531 LS• o II „,m 1 , I O = (Ra) 1'•1 / 1-O.D.IRON PIPE WITH YPC.FOUND MARKED RE DER NOT l 7FND£D \ —— t I „Aa U ,W W�Z6 I gg I // I j ,I / �55.R G ENC..BOZDIAN,MY 7RAN R \ I I g• \1 LOT 4 5 1 ' I/ 1 '°m (Ra) I R 1 // 1 j / 0 -2 1/4•BRA 55 CAP.FOUND MARKED RNERS \ t 1 5.761 m on \ LOT O I 1 g 'Y• 1 LOT 24 I // I •3111 EY Es wEsr, L c , �s: z�\ I s ssi w.x. I f Y o I / < ap \ J o a 1 Lor 2.P9a `.NW I 1 SEC DN 2 725 \\ / I I 60 `\ �.d \ ` /l` (I ,Z„ 1 s..Ro )n. (�) 1 x / 1 I �(� NOTES / 'm 'S". 1 LOT 23 I I 1 j d /� 1.Property ano.m hereon rat onn d to the CRy or Bozemm purwmt to \ R=1099.69 \ \ I I \� ;T a `` LOT ( I U I 2.)It I / 1 I � (/ Mnesallon Agreamml aaeed and recedes m 0.Na_and Commiaalon Resolution No.—receded m Don Na I 2 All lot occesees Moll be bu0t to the standards emtalned h Section =435.33 \ \ t aa,7 L I a LOT 5 LOT 2z 1 ! ti 1a44.oso m the Unified DewJopmmt oralnme or the Ol f Bozeman. I uoo 1 / 1 y° \ =220.55 \\ �. .; +' `\ I `i ( ( j" 1 [v i I 2 a De.eaor�crt or each twtiesa"m,.tia Interfere Ith my agricultural teater \ �4D'S3 I P ,sa I I EASOAEN I C I I Q4 a.Edel.,Zen., R3 \ PHASE IA LOT a / ( 1 (rrP LOT 2t/ I p I 1 j,� r>; 1 3..I so.n. y I terse IL I O I Iea37n yn. O \ BOUNDARY \ r{i � (( I 1 ) 1� V 1 aria,".. •f' F' ti \ a �ti 1a s 0Y B ( 1 1 (ArrmOAaF xousuc> // I I I U LOT 0 I /WET 20 I ,'� 1 (YKR-FAMR,)mfi / I I a.zai on 1§ I ) i q �w < �• (� / / I LOT B 0. i /// I` ! 5: / SITE STATISTICS SU-NDURY \ LOT 7 g 1.. I x,eaoao/L ! PHASE IA / 1 VTO I I T) 1 / I ! I j (�' \ \ � I � a// unuTr LOT 18 1 ,�' I 1 'Z h S� LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1 25,600 SO. FT. 0.588 AC. \ I 41 eLOT w/Lr`� i �\ a" LOT 7 (T p) I ''R�mh. 1 N I � I I a ti 0� LOTS 1-13, BLOCK 2 81,806 SO. FT. 1.878 AG mm I 1 j �0 9 tips` LOTS 1-8. BLOCK 3 49,695 SO. FT. 1.141 AC. \ 9S ^\��1 /•��� ,.ter j 7- Y.�/L I // I j I / ���Q P�/ LOTS 9-30,(RESTRICTED SIZE LOTS-TOWNHOUSE) . FT. 1.638 AC. P Q� LOTS 1-6, BLOCK 4 28,338 SO. FT. 0.651 AC. \ \ LOT 3�` / ice LOT a LOT 1B 1 `/ j 6. N LOT 7, BLOCK 4 159,369 SO FT. 3.659 AC. -� ' 8,400 40•/L ,(�`� p / / 9.429 w.x. I x.8aa R,L \ E. / ♦ ____�� �Rn> ag ,.• - I /1 j (AFFORDABLE HOUSING/MULTI Z I I -------- I t.� PARK AREA 238,622 SO FT. 5.478 AC. I i f>y \ tLor COM erm.alc� 1 e 12.00'` 1 _ / I i I O MON OPEN SPACE 3,898 SO. FT. 0.09 AC. � I 1 ?� STREETS 287.377 SO FT. 6.597 AC. \ o o LOT 4 / b LOT 8 T 14 1 EASEMENT I i 1 ` ?P� GROSS AREA 946,073 SO. FT. 21.719 AC. PI a.4➢o.a.n - 6.292.AIL > a iz erc o,L I a, (TYP) 1 / 1 p5 (Ra) g# # _ tt^- (M) \ \ w / '•G` ( t� 1 1 / • \\\—— v A _ V_•__LOT 13 F\\ Do L \ � \� ( i l \ M I 4r a COBBLESTONE COURT � 7F111 zrraaW ac \ A m sea•43•5rw 2844.aT ns Bss 72S 25s to 12.00• ( i d¢5 sx 9_t'A '15.4M s -LOT .4mT LOT 4 LOT 6 LOT 8 / EA Atu Ery�"'1N7 I 1 • ��E (LP r� t"" 9,^ J w la4se o 4,4m on 4.4m ox 4,4m on 4,4 p on 4zeo.o-n / \ I _ (1w) 9 IL--- `-S Exlsnr4c Q 1 S 1 O SANITARY �./ 1 O 4 // I 1 > I „ - — �,p. PHASE IB 3 tx'ac nu[r N , SEWER\ \ ,CT � I _ _ _ o. EASEMENP\ / J J m e,ar cauuaN aPEN sPAM AND UTIUV EAa ENT n 1 ________ �.y__________J 1 '� i aa,. / / /// aKZ1 11�"a Q 01e to �- __ ( /-� ' 7�-rL-_l _� __ _��_r-___—_r_—y,_ __—__--_—_. _ -. _._._._._ 589'42'S2'W 2839.32' / i ............. _. ._._._. . ._._._._ ^ aGp 032.53 -_/ - Location Map of the --- __ f --- .a 1 �'- ---- WEST WINDS SUBDIVISION �xs>--— ____ —4x�——————_ CHNIBR. SB TION 2 x A—G- — -_—— ——— —-- _ in the NW of Section 2, T2S, RSE, P.M.M. W -- M-_\ J-\_ ---- -•"°----- -OAX�STIfEET(PRINC1PAL ARTER a _ ----- -------- --------- -------------------- ---------------------------------- 80.00' SOU7H 570E OF OAK S7R££T HARVEST LEEK , \E? PREWOUSLY D£D/CA7E0 AND �( ,� SUBD/NSION C\� P \I 1 1 IMPROVED BY HARVEST CREEK v `zA'')EO R-2-A f� P / SUBD/NS/ON PPLAr✓-13154/r HKM Engineering Inc. WEST WINDS 1015 S.Montana St. MAJOR SUBDIVISION P.O.Box 3588 Butte,MT 59702 a.lET1r.QUEST wEsr,LLC DATE MAR 2004 (405)723 8213 LOCATION: NW 1/4 Section 2 T2S.R5E,P.M.Y. 6 E N G I N E ERING FAX(406)723-8328 DRAWN BY:S.OLFRS I SCALE:1*-60' I PLAT Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc,NI Rights Reserved PRO,ECT.04SO67.110 PHI-PRELM-PLATDWG SHEET:I OF 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE • • WEST WINDS MAJOR SUBDIVISION PHASE IA & IB, SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. • GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PURPOSE OF SURVEY: TO CREATE PARCELS FOR FOR PHASE DEVELOPMENT. I ( ( ! I I I I 1 I I I -N- I I I I I I w I iI I i j 60 0 60 120 I i I 1 stole feet SCALE 1' m 60' ! SS9 I o� 1.3 KEST WAHIS ' A 'A6•• F I I PARK AREA��\\ •N^ a I L.EC>E O Y I I Q) I ! I (R)RECORD BEARING AND DISTANCE p moo` R=465.00 I (M)MEASURED BEARING AND gSTANLE L=236.58 (RSL)RESTRICTED SIZE LOT Tan=120.91 A=2909'00" i P0� O -+/2 REBAR AND PLASTIC CAP,SE r FOR � THIS SURVEY MARKED'I GOEBEL 14531 Is Q ' G !' I )I 0 -1"O.D.IRON PIPE WITH YPC,FOUND MARKED R= 30. 0 / /5988'23'05"E 386.99' •S.S.n a ENG.BOZEMAN.Mr L=11 6.2r/ /i Hof 1 \`� R• \Sr01 36'41"W Q -2 1/4-BRASS CAP,FOUND MARKED 0.Tu2.o-IL �3111 FS' A= 8!5 '49" 8 i Q i // TSCHACHE LANE ! - - - / NOTES a a m �l LOT 2 / LOT I G � 00/ 60.00 / 1.Prop i shover,hereon ra nnexed to the City of a---Puraumt to i 6,na.oh. I a3a9 sa.rL I B ' a �m / I nexoert lon Agreement doled and recorded an Doe No._and --- ' Commbeb as n Rdutbn No._recorded on Dx No. R1 I 1 area s4fl q 60'00' r----- ----------- _ 2 All lot acceaeee shall bs bunt to the standards contained In Section I ( I Tf 10 m I a T 1L I qm) I 7 I/// i I taN.090 of the Unified o will not I wfa,oOrdina of the CITY of Bozeman. I LOT 17 I O 3.Devel facility Dorf b"gas tiia.dIt hhae fordo.o-e'dm,N ate u—agriculture! eer SANITARY L 1 a srOT.aK I EASEMENT LOT 1t .I // I 1 ;eaP.o-rL I I I r" 4.Existing Zoning: R3 SEWER , I I ( ) 0.ea3 eo-n. EASEMENT' I 1 /ffff I 10. U u 00' I LOT 19 I I /- 1 I�;BBD sa.IL B I I ! i O TYP / I I $I LOT 4 (/Lo7 19 i 9 Ia T .( ) 1 LOTAS I b.ar3 v}IL I OR W a.e43.13 I rRs<) I 287 s)It. 1 I 1 j w to D y 1 I .aa I on) 1 I I 1 W SITE STATISTICS SiJMMARY PHASE B ") W "gym 1 1 r LOT 1s PHASE 1B BOUND IZY ¢ I _ 11 I g I LO7 9 I ' j" LOTS 1-15. BLOCK 5 105.293 SO. FT. 2.417 AC. v I I I LOT 6_ .. LOT 12 1 O y 1 a (RsLr/ I ', I• / 1 I LOTS 1-6, BLOCK 6 36.457 SO. FT. 0.837 AC. I -as43�o-n. 1 I 1 LOT t9 I O 1 / I I '� RSL LOTS 7-18, BLOCK 6 36,731 SO. FT. 0.843 AC. 0.1W.afL I C) / I 2.—mIL (RESTRICTED SIZE LOTS FOR TOWNHOUSES) "m a I p I I LOT n w I / a., eg11L I i �cT' LOT 1, BLOCK 7 81,174 SO. FT. 1.864 AC. LOT 4 1 3°ns,'" I q c a)_A a"' 1 hS (AFFORDABLE HOUSING/MULTI FAMILY) — i V \ I AiTORDAe E wswc) I E / I LOT O I aeon.o-n. I om I I ruuLn FAMah I I I 0�00 Ok STREETS 150,650 SO FT. 3.458 AC. x W 1 a•ea so- I ) a;°T,n I� I Taa) O LOT n ; I v I i � V S�` ,ti GROSS AREA 410,305 SO. FT. 9.419 AC. ; .�IL I / 1 I f l y ?�Q��� .1,/ 1 Loi �S�wEST WNDS }I� \ $I ��) LOT s 1 ✓I i'�I /'� PARK AREA�� \, O I LOT 7 I LOT O y 1 s.aso.a.n ^I Z \ e.e..T wIL I .eas_IL 1200' I (r+a) i LOTWin. I 1200' EASEMENT 1 EASEMENT / I Aaaoo-f Ig (TYP) I / (rrP) I 1 i QypJ i t LOT e 1 Lo e I I07 e 1 cqm) I d i / 1 I Q0 i I 7,7ss w.h. i 1 s7g,o-IL I e x. a saa x re..n R=269.28 ------�� LOT 7 1 i f I ES.oa s� 35 0 mar ac \' L=110.21 m -� C_---��---� ----__ at '�a"as�n _�`� A' j 94351 w z944.9r ns BSd 5.89 / T am 1 30.00, S6 1r�R58 \ p ) / AMS �B 7�A - .� SAMTARY 9 2 SEWER Y N88'12'21"W I \A=23 26'S8"� p $ ) / 83 .16' PHASE lA BOUNDARY I EASEMENT �fSl•6 3O1 N8812-2}- '�o I / _ J 79 16' fO ( J BREEZE LANE 29 / ------ 1 m-fine.aM 7--f Imen _ ... ! _e�� W a 1111�; N \�p4• g l LOT 1 1 ( LOT� 1 y I , LOT 30 = r_____________ I ep PRASE JB I i i i�-�.ws vein. I },s.a.n. 3 ! f LOT 1 z y xo�rts>'L y 1 ___; j I "S � � PHASE IA sue.z r rise � Ls•w..br.� s 589.42'52'w 2839.37 c.v er ssm,z Y ne wv►.A rrt.w,.d'ss s Location Map of the WEST WINDS SUBDIVISION in the NW y of Section 2, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. HKM Engineering Inc. WEST WINDS 1015 S.Montana St. MAJOR SUBDIVISION P.O.Box 3588 Butte,MT 59702 CLIENT:QUEST WEST,LLC DATE:MAR zoos (406)723-8213 LOCATION: NW 1/4 Section 2,T2S,R5E,P.M.M. bE N G I N E E R I N G FAX(406)723-8328 DRAWN BY:S.E0.ERS I SCALE:1--60' I PLAT Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc,NI Rights Reserwd. PROJECT:04SO67.110 PHI-PRELIM-PLAT.DWG SHEET:2 OF 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE ® • WEST WINDS MAJOR SUBDIVISION PHASE IA & IB, SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. 1� GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PURPOSE OF SURVEY: TO CREATE PARCELS FOR FOR PHASE DEVELOPMENT. CE ITMATE OF DEDICATION I,the undersigned property owner,do hereby certiffyy that I have caused to be_-,ed,eubdl.ded,and platted Into lot0.Dloek0.street.,park arsa0. open spaces and other dMsions and dedications a..hoom by the plot 1 hereunto Included,the following described tract of Iona.to sit- LEGAL DESCEPTKNI f Quest Went, LLC,does hereby certify that they haw caused to be eurwyed,subdivided and platted into lots.bloda.reads,park IC s and open CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR We_as ahown m the accompanying plot hereunto annexed,the following I,James M.Goebel,Lund Surveyor No.14531 LS,do hereby erlify that desarlbed trod of lend In Gallatin County.Montmo,to wit between April 2003 and 2OD4.I eurwyed the West Winds Major SubdMalm,Phase IA d I8.,and platted the some as shown an the That portion o1 the NW 14 of Section 2,T2S,RSE,P.M.M.,Gallatin County, accompanying plat and as dsacrlbaQ In accordance Mmtana subaMdm and Montano and maro particularly described as fallow¢ Platting Act Setif;:76-3-101 through 76-}625 M.C.A,and the Bozrnan Moo Subcg" Ragulalions. P11A.a lA OESO8710N Beghnnq at a pant which Is the Center of ealtl Section 2.T2$RSE,P.M.M., baled this_day of 200_� TAencm deg the north-south half line,North 01'4Y54"East,898.02 feat James M.Cam" Thenck North 8812'21"West,633.18 feet: Thenck South 01YY]9"Punt Montmo Regbtraticn No.14331 L.S 60.00 feet Thene.,North 88�2'21'West 79A6 feet to a point of curvature, Deputy Carl,and Recorder conemw Southeasterly; Therco along said arve to the left hating on arc length of 110.21 rest radius of 259.28 feet centrd angle or 2325'56",and a CERTIFICATE OF DiiECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE chord bearing South 8004'f0"Wast 109.44/set: Thanck South 68R9'36' CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE West 104.90 feat to a Pohl of curwlure,concave Seuthweatedr. Then a Thence. 1,Director of Public Sviek City of Bozeman.Montane,do hereby dong sold wow,hating an me length of 435.33 feet radius of 1099.69 feet certify that the accompanying plat has been duly esomned and has central angle of 2740'53,and a chord bearing South 0973.38"East 2 4349 found the sane to conform to law,opprows it and hereby accepts lest Thencq South 01'4Y39"West 387.46 feet to a point an the east-west the dedication to the City of Bozemon far the public use of my and half line of said.eetlon 2: Thence,long sold hall Iinq North 89'42'52"East .9 lands shown on the plat as being dedicated to such use. 1032.53 feet to the point of beginning,containing 21.719 acres. Dated this day o/ 200_- j�g3jl Dj City or of Public Service y Beginning at a pant on the north-south half line of sold Section 2.from City o1 Do.--.Montona which the Center of add Section 2,bees South 01'4-rW West 898.02 feet 1 sse.90 North t oast of�uutr t r' 1coe�. S-th.North 01*4r3g*East. ostiely, Thencx atoning sold CERTFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANA c,aw to the right having an era length of 23QOD feet radius of 230.00 feet DEPARTME]!T OF ENVRONrEN TAL DUAL iTY REVEYV central angle of 2"749 and a chord bearing North 1616'W East 115,03 feet: Thence,North 30'4W29"East,114.81 feet. Thence.South 5914'05"East The West Winds Major Subeivialon Phase IA h IB..Gallatin County,Montona,is 137.76 feet to a point of curvaturq eon eve Nertheastaly, Thmck along said within the City of Bozeman.Ma tano,a first-class municipality,and within the wow to the left having an arc length of 238.58 feet radius of 465,00 feet planning arm of the Bozeman 2020 Community Nan,a growth policy adapted crntid angle of 29MVOO',and a chord bearing South 73'48'35"East 23k03 Pursuant to Section 76-1-601 at seq.,M.C.A.and be provided with fact: Thence,South 882SW East,386.99 feet to a point o the north-south adequate storm water drainage and adequate municipal fac=! Thereforq half 1n.of sold Section 2: Thmae,ale9 sold north=half lnq South under the prowims of Saaum 76-4-125(2)(d)M.C.A..this subdifalm-1. 0176'41"West 34.95 feel to the center north 1/16 color of sold Section 2: duded from the requirement far Montana Department o1 Environmental Thomak continuing along the north-south hall link South 01'4Y5{"west Quality R.%- 438.23 feet to the point of beginning,containing 9.419 acres, Doted this day or 200- Total aubdMd d area Is 31.138 Acres. Dryater of Public Srsx. City of Bozernm.Montana 4 The drew tracts of land are to be known and d.slgrhaled eran the VIEMontana, weds land,AXIR SUBDIVISION I"it llro 1A antl 1B c1lY of ea:amen. men CERTFICATE OF COMPLETION OF�PROVEMENTS Mantanq one the land.ndueea h all streelk .k pain d cam aegis shown an told plot or. r hereby granted donated.and dedicated Ws.John Dunlap,and I,Clint UUq a registered engineer licensee to practice n to the City of Bozemm far the public use and enjoyment. the State of Montana do hereby certify that the following knprowmenla, requred m a Condition of cppm,W of the West Winds Major SubdlAsldn Phase The undersigned every hereby grants onto each and Person,firmoron m IA h IB haw been bded corporation,whsthr public ar priwtk pro ldng offering to provide telephonic electric,power,ga0.cab tal-W ter ors service to the public,the Smile ry sawn Mohe and S.A_Water Manor d Services. right to the pint use of m ea anent o1 the c-structim,maintenance.repar Street Improwmente,the sidewalks and etmn drainage bnprovament. and remold of that.Ilnea and other fnetllics.In,over,and under and-33 an all atrmta and within the Pubic Park Imda. each as designated on this plat as"Utnity Easement-to haw and hold forever. The subdMder hereby warrants against defects n these Improvements faro period o/ant year from the data o1 I..tallatfon. Thor subdhAder John Dunlap Title grants possession of all public nrostructure ve Improments to the City ion Qunt West LLC of Bozeman,and the City hereby accepts possession of all public Dated this_day of 2004. nft truchurc Improwumentq subject to the above Indicated warranty. by John Dunlap,partner STATE OF MONANA WEST WEST,LLC COUNTY OF GALLATIN Data o.Netory Public�f the Stale of Montana,personally appeared John Dunlap, by aInl UUk PE . known to me to be a parlor of GUEST WEST,o Mantane Limited Liability Manlana Regbtratlan Nw 10788 PE Company.and the person whosa names are subscribed to the within Instrument Data and acknowledged to me that they executed m the sak far and an behalf of J cold Limited Uobllty Company. In within whereat 1 haw hereunto apt hand and affixed my offidd coal the day and year n this certificate first y Ir Drsalor of Public Services above written. City of Bezaman,Mart­ -Iding of Deter my NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA eommbelm eprp CERTMATE OF COUNTY TREASURER I, Treo of Gallatin County,Mmtano.do hacb; Dated this_day of 200� .artily that the occampanying plat has been duly examined and that all real property lases and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided how been paid Doled this_day e/ 200- NEW UTLJTY EA Deputy Traasurer of Ga6atIn County SEMENTS ' ontERSNATs�soGw4ALL STREETS CLERK AND RECORDER JI Carl,and Recorder of Gallatin County.Mmtana Id'*hereby certify that the foregoing Instrument was filed in my CERTMATE OF AEISTRACTOR afnce at_e dock_.M.this_day or A.D..200_-and recorded In Boak_ef plat..Page_ record.o1 the O.rk and, I,as o Title Abatroetor,do hereby certify that.pursuant Recorder,Gallatin County,Montana. le Section 76-3-612(1),M.QA..the following are the irecord d ilenholdaa ar claimants of record Document Number--by., against the land to be subdivided. Deputy Clerk and Records ' OWNERS OF RECORD: WEST WEST,LLC DEED REFERENCE FILM 174.PAGE 751 UENHOLDER(S)OF RECORD: ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK-BOZEMAN , Dated this_day of 20" Signed of � HKM Engineering Inc. WEST WINDS �i 1015 S.Montana St. MAJOR SUBDIVISION P.O.Box 3588 Butte,MT 59702 CLIENT.QUEST WEST,LLC DATE:MAR 2004 (406)723-8213 LOCATION: NW 1/4 section 2,T2S,R5E,P.M.M. 6 ENGINEERING FAX(406)723-8328 DRAWN BY:S.EILERS I SCALE 1--60' 1 RAT Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc.All Rights Reserved. PR cl04SO67.110 PHI-PRELIM-PLAT.DWC SHEET:3 OF 3 a 1 �� �, �' Q. FX• V:/ v • A P P � ADJOINING PROPERTY E OWNERS LIST D I X S D • 5 • CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Ll ale , E , hereby ceru�r that, to the best of my knowledge, die attached name and address list of all adjoining propem, owners within 200 feet of die Nl o `/y 04 S,�:rJ,'cn C9, Town sh,p )�-n2e S �57- property located at G p II r h r, Cn(nl l , Pornfar e is a true and accurate list from die last declared Gallatin County tax records. I f1.lrther understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. - 7 4 i-art,6 PE Lu Signature s��. • . , kit 'S (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List—Prepared 11/20/03) • y - C� +leBar II Limited Partnership Peter& Kay I K--lly . Idaho Street, Suite 201 2719 McCormick Street Boise, ID 83702-6065 Bozeman, MT 59718 George C &Mary Ellen Stewart David 0 Chrest 160 W 66th Street, Apt 25C 415 Buckhorn Trail New York, NY 10023-6559 Bozeman, MT 59718 Ira Martin& Barbara J Bakken Joe &Joyce Albro', 3333 Fieldstone Drive W 2713 Allison Ct. Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59718 Steven M &Deanne L Smith David J &Lavern C Parisi '' Allison Ct. 509 Arbor Drive man, MT 59718 Livingston, MT 59047 David &Adelaide Astrom Anne J Schneider Astrom 1993 Trust 3831 Lincoln Road 2324 Shenandoah Place Santa Barbara, CA 93110-1.533 Davis, CA 95616-6602 David Wallis &Bobbe Ann Kerr Richard J &Nancy K Ojala 14711 Stanbridge Drive 2741 Allison Ct. Houston, TX 77083-5606 Bozeman, MT 59718 Michael P Renaud Gordon &Leesa W Gregory 2803 Allison Ct. 2807 Allison Ct. ) man, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 Dragan B Danevski Ryan A Anderson la V Susak 2813 Allison Ct. 2 Allison Ct. Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 Lloyd G & Lorraine S Jacobsen William E &Kimmer Elise Penniman 2820 Allison Ct. 2812 Allison Ct. Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 Mary. J Christiansen Jay Edwin& Lola Beth Conner 2806 Allison Ct. 1221 Buckrake Ave. Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 Andrew L Cetraro Jason C &Rachelle M Brinkman Buckrake Ave. 1222 Buckrake Ave. man, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 William R Fiedler Jared A&Tracy Rasmussen Lynn MJ Fiedler 1229 Barley Ave. 1228 Buckrake Ave. Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman,MT 59718 Tracy Larimer Nicole Wood 1227 Barley Ave. P.O. Box 134 Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59771 Matthew L & Angela R Jamison Terrance E &Kirsten K Kubat 1229 Hunters Way 1223 Hunters Way *man, MT 59718 Bozeman,MT 59718 Shi-Jie Gary Chen wa Dale Ong Douglas J &Diane F Aita AbH1226 Hunters Way IM Hunters Way Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 Joan Stanley WM R& Dianne Peterson 1234 Hunters Way 5001 Baxter Lane E Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 Ben & Diane Rogers Lawry J &Dorothy,M Brekke 6724 Davis Lane 5131 Baxter Lane E Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 James &Elizabeth Drummond Ronald K &Janice E Lewis P Box 3652 5251 Baxter Lane E .,man, MT 59772 Bozeman, MT 59718 Evert T &Jamee D Wierda Buffalo Land Management, LLC Baxter Square Partners 13707 Camp Creek Road � 317 Sanders Ave Manhattan, MT 59741-8619 Bozeman,MT 59718 Monte Lee Cooper Bozeman Congregation of Jehovahs Witnesses Deborah Lee Berglund 2155 Lomas Drive 1406 Bear Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Gallatin Center Limited Pamership 220 W Lamme Street, Suite 1F > eman, MT 59715 0 Roger H Smith Baxter Meadows 2*land I Smith AD%Baxter Meadows Development W. Durston Rd. 2110 Overland Ave, Suite 127 Bozeman, Mt 59718 Billings, MT 59102 Carl H Vander Molen John Vincent 56 Park Plaza Road Gallatin County Bozeman, MT 59715 311 West Main, Room 306 Bozeman, MT 59715 Homelands Development Co. Homelands Development Co. 11258 Cottonwood Road 11258 Cottonwood Road Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59718 Homelands Development Co. 1 8 Cottonwood Road man, MT 59718 D � n �� � "� y it H ~31 _Q. �• v � r • A P P PRELIMINARY PLAT E CERTIFICATE D I X S D 6 It PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE 27 3391 089 00698 DATED: March 1, 2004 ORDER NO. : 1-76114 TO: HKM Engineering Inc. ATTN: Clint Litle 601 Nickles Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY To the County of Gallatin and the City of Bozeman in Montana CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, with its principal office in the City of Chicago, Illinois, and duly authorized to insure titles in Montana hereby certifies that from its examination of these public records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the real estate described in Schedule A hereof, as of the 25th day of February 492004,at 5 o'clock P.M.,the title to the described real estate was indefeasibly vested in fee = simple of record in: Quest West, LLC subject only to the objections, liens charges,encumbrances and other matters shown under Schedule B hereof. The maximum liability of the undersigned under this certificate is limited to the sum of$ 200.00 f This certificate of title is made in consideration of the payment of the premium by the subdivider of the land and for the use of the County and City above named. e; - Issued by: AMERICAN LAND CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMPANY By: P. 0. Box 396 Boze ontan 59715 �E°," :�,� ✓ � �'< l T ATTES : Pres' ent .............. Authorized Signatory Secretary PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE(MONTANA) Reorder Form No.91 U • Schedule A Page 2 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00698 Order No.: 1-76114 Being the legal description of the real estate covered by this certificate. The following described parcel of real estate: NWti� of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. [Deed Reference: Film 174, page 751] • Schedule A Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) • Schedule B Page 3 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00698 Order No.: 1-76114 Being all of the estates, interests, equities, lawful claims, or demands, defects, or objections whatsoever to title; and all easements, restrictions, liens, charges, taxes (general, special, or inheritance, or assessments of whatever nature), or encumbrances; and all other matters whatsoever affecting said premises, or the estate, right, title or interest of the record owners, which now do exist of record. 1. Except all minerals in or under said land including, but not limited to, metals, oil, gas, coal, stone and mineral rights, mining rights and easement rights or other matters relating thereto, whether expressed or implied. 2. Easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions, and other servitudes that are not subject to the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act are not shown herein. 3. Taxes for the year 2003 and subsequent years. Taxes for the first half of the year 2003 are delinquent plus penalty and interest from date delinquent. Taxes for the second half of the year 2003 are due and payable and will be delinquent if not paid on or before May 31, 2004. • Taxes for the year 2004 are a lien not yet due or payable. Included within the General Taxes are Gallatin Conservation District and Planning District. (Parcel No. RGG8283.) 4. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to Rocky Mountain Bank—Bozeman in the amount of $3,570,000.00, dated April 3, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:00 P.M., as Document No. 2103189. 5. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to Gaylord Simons Trust in the amount of$150,000.00, dated April 2, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:00 P.M., as Document No. 2103190. 6. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to Kenneth P. Williams in the amount of$150,000.00, dated April 2, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:00 P.M., as Document No. 2103191. 7. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to Cascade Homes, Inc. in the amount of$300,000.00, dated April 2, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:00 P.M., as Document No. 2103192. 8. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to Williams Plumbing and Heating, Inc. in the amount of $550,000.00, dated April 2, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:00 P.M., as Document No. 2103193. 9. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to The Vector Group, LLC in the amount of$70,000.00, dated April 2, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:00 P.M., as Document No. 2103194. Oontinued) Schedule B Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) Schedule B Page 4 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00698 Order No.: 1-76114 10. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to Biggerstaff Construction, Inc. in the amount of $200,000.00, dated April 2, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:00 P.M., as Document No. 2103195. 11. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC to Donald Russell and Renee Russell in the amount of $100,000.00, dated July 8, 2003 and recorded July 17, 2003 at 11:15 A.M., as Document No. 2115770. 12. No Search has been made for water rights and unpatented mining claims, and liability thereon is excluded from coverage of this certificate. END OF SCHEDULE B Schedule B Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies'Privacy Statement July 1,2001 We recognize and respect the privacy expectations of today's consumers and'the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"),and to whom it is disclosed,will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve.This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business,we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: ■ From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative; ■ From your transactions with,or from the services being performed by,us,our affiliates,or others; ■ From our internet web sites; ■ From the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities,or from our affiliates or others;and ■ From consumer or other reporting agencies. Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information We maintain physical,electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes. Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates,such as insurance companies,agents,and other real estate settlement service providers. We also may disclose your Personal Information: • to agents,brokers or representatives to provide you:with services you have requested; ■ to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf;and • to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest. In addition,we will disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission,when we are required by law to do so,or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as,for example,when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement,transaction or relationship with you. One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such documents may contain your Personal Information. Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and,under certain circumstances,to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also,certain states afford you the right to request correction,amendment or deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right,where permitted by law,to charge a reasonable fee.to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. All requests must be made in writing to the following address: Privacy Compliance Officer Fidelity National Financial,Inc. 4050 Calle Real,Suite 220 Santa Barbara,CA 93110 Multiple Products or Services If we provide you with more than one financial product or service,you may receive more than one privacy notice from us. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. AMERICAN LAND THLE COMPANY PRIVACY POLICY We collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you,such as your name,address,telephone number, or social security number, • Information about your transactions with us,our affiliates,or others. We receive this information from your lender,attorney,real estate broker, etc; and • Information from public records. We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information,to provide the products and services requested by you or your lender. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with appropriate federal and state regulations. If we provide you with more than one financial product or service,you may receive more than one privacy notice from us. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. s UB APP Appendix SD-7 • � A P P SUBDIVISION APPLICATION E N D I X S D 7 DEVELOPMENWIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANOES application Type: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N . O P Q R SO U V W X Y Z AA B B : ,sts Required: ❑ Wetland Review Checklist ❑ Subdivision Pre-application Checklist ❑ Reuse, Change in Use/Further Development Subdivision Preliminary Plat Checklist ❑ COA Checklist 1 ❑ Subdivision Final Plat Checklist ❑ COA Checklist 2 ❑ Subdivision Exemption Checklist ❑ Site Plan Checklist ❑ Annexation Checklist ❑ Zoning Variance/Appeal Checklist ❑ Text/Map Amendment Checklist ❑ PUD Checklist ❑ Growth Policy Amendment Checklist Adjoiners Certificate Required? Yes ❑ No Number of Sets of Plans Required: Adjoinees Materials Required: ❑ None Standard - List of names and addresses for property owners within 200 feet of the site. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes addressed with the names and addresses of property owners. ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Only - List; two sets of mailing labels; and one set of stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes containing the names and addresses of property owners of-physically contiguous property and all recorded purchasers under contract for deed. Plus; a list and one set of stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes containing the names and addresses of all other.property owners within 200 feet of the site. R wired Fee: 0 P] 03M by �' �t'QU �� �� . . . ` �� j' :I � �� _ OF BOZEMAN • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 OM ,��„ 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 ' "� P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1.Name of Project/Development: Aafe Svw%* Ui 5iOc1 I,JeS� 1,.,,t��S `?1Gnned `2:Property Owner Information: Name: Ouue3 l,Je3l LL,C E-mail Address: JdUrt�Q(� (` GGSCC,deflOm�.0 3895 UAIIeL/ Commcws Dri ue Mailing Address: Su;-fie 3ozFmA m 7- Phone: FAX: yU(D- s o 19 517 3.Applicant Information: Name: Obe—s� k,[OsT L L C. E-mail Address: J dUfl IQ� CGSCC�C�P �U� 'ailing Address: 38a s VAlley Cammc»5 �i Ue ` S�;+e �. t3c�z�nAn, mT 59�r�f-Co43(o hone: ao — SB.S-9a3p FAX: ya(9- SS�P _ 4. Representative Information: NAM �;n enrinc Inc . C 11'�Af ; hAm jnc .C� Name: E-mail Address: Clln� 1-i'41e , ?E. Mailing Address: (ZI N,•k}Ps Drf Je , Su*+ea BozemPn, MT Sq 7/S- Phone: yU - S8(o-C�' ,2 LJ FAX: y019^ 5 lr730 NwYq o S�-1•!on a, Townshp a soL)�, �Anq-P s F�s4, P./n•[n, 5. Legal Description: 0 ( : Irn ; 4 � [6. Street Address: M SC-� Chi (.fO Uwn A S rn� 7. Project Description: 3 j vs'ACf e /Y>>xeol IJS� l�Psi C�En�i,4/ SUbd� v►s�pn w►+E.,� � w►ems ��Gn��a ��,m��,a�, . Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s): C 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Page 1 F . Gross Area: Acres: 31,os Sq e Feet: 12.Net Area: Ac . t,I.g3 Square Feet: pis the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a No,go to question 14 a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor _7 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? Yes ❑ No .M 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑ Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit 15�7 Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑ F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑ H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑ I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z.Zoning Variance L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA. Growth Policy Map Amendment M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24- by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and/or property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I (We)hereby certify that the above informal s true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: MKA Date: 3/1 ledi e Ar Applicant's Signature: Date: 04 LILIA 44" PropertyEOwner's Signature. I� IN a �� L Date:�,Propertyer's Signature: ` Date: O �-roperty Owner's Signature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) SUB*ISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECK* 71-Ase checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No" or"N/A" (not applicable) 0 t be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. Subdivision ❑ Minor Tvp First nor Subdivision from a Tract of Record ❑ First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record with a Variance ❑ Second or Subsequent Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record" Major Subdivision B. Total Number of Lots. 89 C Proposed Uses. Indicate the number of lots (or spaces subdivisions for rent or lease, or units for condominiums) for each of the following uses: Residential,single household Park/Recreation/Open Space a Residential,multi household Manufactured Home Space Planned Unit Development Recreational Vehicle Space Condominium Unit 'Commercial L]O Townhouse Industrial Other D. Preliminary Plat Requirements. The preliminary plat submittal must include the following information.Please refer to §18.78.040,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. iPreliminary Plat Requirements Yes No N/A All information required with the pre-application plan, as outlined in §18.78.030 (Subdivision ❑ ❑ Preapplication Plan),BMC Name and location of the subdivision, scale, scale bar, north arrow, date of preparation, lots and ❑ ❑ blocks (designated by number),the dimensions and area of each lot,and the use of each lot,if other than for single family All streets, roads, alleys, avenues, highways, and easements; the width of the right-of-way, grades, [? ❑ ❑ and curvature of each; existing and proposed road and street names; and proposed location of intersections for any subdivision requiring access to arterial or collector highways The names of adjoining platted subdivisions and numbers of adjoining certificates of survey � ❑ ❑ An approximate survey of the exterior boundaries of the platted tract with bearings, distances, and ❑ ❑ curve data indicated outside of the boundary lines. When the plat is bounded by an irregular shoreline or a body of water,the bearings and distances of a closing meander traverse shall be given The approximate location of all section corners or legal subdivision corners of sections pertinent to ❑ ❑ the subdivision boundary If the improvements required are to be completed in phases after the final plat is filed, the approxi- mate area of each phase shall be shown on the plat Ground contours at?-foot intervals if slope is under 10 percent;5-foot intervals if slope is between ❑ ❑ 10 and 15 percent;and 10-foot intervals if slope is 15 percent or greater i I List of waivers granted from the requirements of §18.78.060 (Additional Subdivision Preliminary I I ❑ I ❑ i Plat Supplements),BMC during the preapplication process W,'I I D .46 U QE �EV i Request for exemption from Montana-Department of Environmental Quality Review as described ❑ i ❑ i [ I 1 in§18.78.040.K(Request for Exemption from MDEQ Review),BMC LAll appropriate certificates (refer to Charter 18.12,BMC) f ❑ ❑ Page 3 (Subdivision Preliminary Plat Checklist-Prepared 11/26/03) E. Preliminary Plat Supplements dbuired for All Subdivisions. The suppl' mtal information shall include the .05 g followin . Please refer to§18.780,BMC for the specific requirements for each ite . Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions Yes No N/A • A map showing all adjacent sections of land,subdivision,certificates of survey,streets and roads S ❑ ❑ Map of entire subdivision on either an 8'h-inch x 11-inch, 8'/z-inch x 14-inch,or 11-inch x 17-inch ® ❑ ❑ sheet A written statement describing any requested subdivision variance(s) and the facts of hardship upon S ❑ ❑ which the request is based. Refer to Chapter 18.66 (Variance,Deviation and Appeal Procedures), BMC Covenants,Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation for the Property Owners'Association N ❑ ❑ Encroachment permits or a letter indicating intention to issue a permit where new streets, ❑ ❑ easements,rights-of way or driveways intersect State,County,or City highways,streets or roads A letter of approval or preliminary approval from the City of Bozeman where a zoning change is ❑ ❑ necessary NO Z I C C h A draft of such other appropriate certificates. N ❑ ❑ Provision for maintenance of all streets (including emergency access), parks, and other required ® ❑ ❑ improvements if not dedicated to the public,or if private Profile sheets for street grades greater than 5 percent S ❑ ❑ 14 If an authorized representative signs on behalf of an owner of record, a copy of the authorization ❑ ❑ shall be provided Owner W j /l 5 Lan A Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District for IR ❑ ❑ control of noxious weeds A preliminary platting certificate,prepared by a Montana title company ® ❑ 1 ❑ F. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements. The following list of preliminary plat application supplements shall also be provided for all subdivisions unless waived by the Development Review Comrnittee during the pre- application process. The developer shall include documentation of any waivers granted by the City after the pre- application meeting or plan review. Please refer to§18.78.060,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Additional Subdivision PreliminaryPlat Supplements Yes No N/A Waived uPP Surface water �K ❑ ❑ ❑ Floodplains ' 11,4 ❑ ❑ [K ❑ Groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ Geology,soils and slope ❑ ❑ ❑ Vegetation ❑ ❑ ❑ Wildlife . ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Historical features ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Agriculture N ❑ ❑ ❑ Agriculture water user facilities ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Water and sewer ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Stormwater management [9 ❑ ❑ I ❑ Streets,roads and alleys ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Utilities ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Educational facilities ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Land use ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks and recreation facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ Neighborhood center plan ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Lighting plan ❑ ❑ ❑ Miscellaneous ❑ ❑ , ❑ ❑ Additional relevant and reasonable information identified during the preapplication j process and required to adequately assess whether the proposed subdivision complies with the Unified Development Ordinance and the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act Page 4 PUD AND SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS DEVELOPt&T REVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTVD FEES Application Type: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O. Q R' S T U V W X Y Z AA B B �cklists Required: ❑ Wetland Review Checklist ❑ Subdivision Pre-application Checklist ❑ Reuse, Change in Use/Further Development ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Checklist ❑ COA Checklist 1 ❑ Subdivision Final Plat Checklist ❑ COA Checklist 2 ❑ Subdivision Exemption Checklist Site Plan Checklist ❑ Annexation Checklist ❑ Zoning Variance/Appeal Checklist ❑ Text/Map Amendment Checklist PUD Checklist ❑ Growth Policy Amendment Checklist Adjoiners Certificate Required? ] Yes ❑ No Number of Sets of Plans Required: oC Adjoiners Materials Required: ❑ None Standard - List of names and addresses for property owners within 200 feet of the site. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) 410 envelopes addressed with the names and addresses of property owners. ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Only - List; two sets of mailing labels; and one set of .:tamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes containing the names and addresses of property owners of physically contiguous property and all recorded purchasers under contract for deed. Plus, a list and one set of stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes containing the names and addresses of all other property owners within 200 feet of the site. Required Fee: 60 f v `F 46r oo , ' �� /PXW aQ& OF BOZEMANll DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montano 59771-1230 www'.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1.Name of Project/Development: � � ; S —�)Q- N n� 2. Property Owner Information: Name: QL)ez'A ��Sj LLC, E-mail Address: Jdun lap Q,mscFadeho#x-coin 38a� Vie I1� �cminm 5 (Jr U e Mailing Address: Soi*p 4 3oz�m�, mT 5�'718-�c13(o Phone: FAX' L-IC XP - SS(P 3.Applicant Information: / Name: `� U(c5-� k)es4- L L C E-mail Address: J d Un IQP 9, o%holor. 3 C9- V A Neq (bmrrx.-")5 Drive `wiling Address: 5U�+e 4 emAn, MT 6te/'718--Loy3(o •none: FAX: 4. Representative Information: OW) Fncfn�nc/ � Znc. Name: C��n� �I�� / � �, E-mail Address: CI���'/� �c' hkminC'. c� Mailing Address: &0/ �J, /SAS Dt•'i Vre, SU bor-emAc�\ WvT 5-P?)5- Phone: O _ 3 FAX: gob- Isp/„ ^ Iq,3D al Description- Nw Y4 O-f S��f`on a , Townshi)o a SUv , l�-An�� S'�`Hsf� p/h•!h g P c F 6. Street Address: LP f ; rae 7. Project Description: l Co/ 3 -Acre 6CO-5s Vn,y � m'red USA f�PSI O�P/� �i�/ l�i�J�/h� G�vPIvpmFn� 8. Zoning Designation(s): _ 9. Current Land Use(s): 10.Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: �SI L►'EJl7�/� I Page 1 11. Gross Area: Acres:�(p�. 3 Square Feet: 12.Net Area: Acres: (73dF Square Feet: ^)Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes, answer question 13a No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? Yes [E] No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑ Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑ S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑ Y.Unified.Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z.Zoning Variance • L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8'/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/2-by 14-inches. If 3—ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and/or property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I (We)hereby certify that the above information true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: d Applicant's Signature: Ada", Date: J , oq Property Owner's Signature: Date: ''roperty Owner's Signature: Date: Oroperty Owner's Signature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No" or"N/A" (not applicable) 0 st be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Does the proposal one or more of the following. Yes No 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ ❑ 30,000 or more square feet of office space,retail commercial space,service commercial space or industrial ❑ ❑ space More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses,permitted retail commercial uses,permitted ❑ ❑ service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ ❑ Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑ ❑ B. General Information. General Information Yes No N/A Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ❑ ❑ ❑ A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel ❑ ❑ ❑ to and from the site. The route shall avoid,where possible,local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety Boundary line of property with dimensions ❑ ❑ ❑ • Date of plan preparation and changes ❑ ❑ ❑ North point indicator ❑ ❑ ❑ Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑ ❑ ❑ Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ❑ ❑ ❑ Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio,FAR),with a ❑ ❑ ❑ breakdown by land use Location,percentage of parcel(s) and total site,and square footage for the following- Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ ❑ Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ ❑ Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ ❑ Total number,type and density per type of dwelling units,and total net and gross residential density ❑ ❑ ❑ and density per residential parcel Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, ❑ ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each The information required by 118.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless such ❑ ❑ ❑ information was previously provided through a subdivision review process,or the provision of such information,was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to. be developed, or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application • Description and mapping of soils existing on the site,accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of ❑ ❑ ❑ such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03) Building design information(on-site): Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the buildings)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ ❑ Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot outfall ❑ ❑ ❑ • when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ ❑ Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes,sales offices and/or ❑ ❑ ❑ construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ ❑ complying with '18.78.0501-L BMC(Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72,BMC(Supplementary ❑ ❑ ❑ Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated:- Site Plan Information Yes No N/A Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determined by the Planning Director ❑ ❑ ❑ Adjacent meets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet, except for sites adjacent.to major ❑ ❑ ❑ arterial meets where the distances shall be 200 feet On-site meets and rights-of-way ❑ ❑ ❑ Ingress and egress points ❑ ❑ ❑ Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ ❑ Traffic flow off-site ❑ ❑ ❑ Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: • Electric ❑ ❑ ❑ Natural gas ❑ ❑ ❑ Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑ ❑ ❑ Water ❑ ❑ ❑ Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ ❑ Surface water,including: Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑ ❑ ❑ Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ❑ ❑ ❑ Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis,topographic survey or other objective and factual basis A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58,BMC(Bozeman Floodplain ❑ ❑ ❑ Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality ❑ ❑ ❑ improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways,reservoirs,etc.which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: The name of the drainageway(where-appropriate) ❑ ❑ ❑ The downstream conditions(developed,available.drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ ❑ Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ ❑ Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic ❑ ❑ ❑ • features Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details and ❑ ❑ ❑ interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict Page 4 Provision for handicapped acclWility, including but not limited to, wheelch ' ps, parking ❑ ❑ ❑ spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ ❑ Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for ❑ ❑ ❑ compliance with Chapter 1852, BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ ❑ A site plan, complete with all structures, parking spaces, building.entrances, traffic areas (both ❑ ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian),vegetation that might interfere with lighting,and adjacent uses,containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in '18.78.0602,BMC (Lighting Plan),if not previously provided Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ ❑ Landscaping - detailed plan showing plantings, equipment, and other appropriate information as ❑ ❑ ❑ required in 118.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required, complete section C below. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and ❑ ❑ ❑ shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ ❑ Location of City limit boundaries, and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ Historic,cultural and archeological resources,describe and map any designated historic structures or ❑ ❑ ❑ districts,and archeological or cultural sites Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: . Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the property ❑ ❑ ❑ owner and the person preparing the plan Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑ ❑ ❑ Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses,required watercourse setbacks,and the location of ❑ ❑ ❑ any 100 year floodplain; the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines, driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ ❑ ❑ ` Location,height and material of proposed screening and fencing (with berms to be delineated by ❑ ❑ ❑ one foot contours) Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer strips ❑ ❑ ❑ Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan,including ❑ ❑ ❑ typical symbols, names (common and botanical name),-locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and ❑ ❑ ❑ loading areas, including information as to the amount (m square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from damage ❑ ❑ ❑ during construction Size, height, location and material of proposed seating, lighting, planters, sculptures, and water ❑ ❑ ❑ features A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 5 Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ ❑ Tabulation of points earned by the plan—see '18.48.060,BMC(Landscape Performance Standards) ❑ ❑ ❑ Designated snow removal storage areas ❑ ❑ ❑ Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑ ❑ ❑ Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage ❑ ❑ ❑ control Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ ❑ Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ ❑ Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ ❑ Planting plan for watercourse buffers, per 118.42.100, BMC (Watercourse Setbacks), if not ❑ ❑ ❑ previously provided through subdivision review Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not otherwise ❑ ❑ ❑ provided by the application.Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls Page 6 PO1NED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHECOT The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as pan of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not Iplicable) most be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. •A. ❑ Planned Unit Development- Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A Data regarding site conditions, land characteristics, available.community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information about adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land Gonceptual (sketch) drawing showing the proposed location of the uses of land, major ❑ ❑ ❑ streets and other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site A computation table showing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and as a ❑ ❑ ❑ percent of total site area B . Planned Unit Development— Preliminary Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yes No N/A The following information shall be presented'man 8'h_- by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order. Application forms 91 ❑ ❑ A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of ❑ ❑ the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the '9 ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas C$ ❑ ❑ Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or IN ❑ ❑ portions of the planned unit development Estimate of number of employees for business,commercial and industrial uses ❑ ❑ Non- Cornwe og 1 APPY04tVn Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the ❑ ❑ applicant Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed,the applicant ❑ ❑ shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of '18.36.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria), BMC The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character are �] ❑ ❑ being avoided or mitigated Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling) A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of ❑ ❑ the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas • One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 8'h-by 11-inches or 11- by 17-inches size Page 3 (PUD Checklist-Prepared 12/2/03) In addition to all of ormation listed on the Site Plan Checklist, llowing information shall be included on the site plan: Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included where IR ❑ ❑ appropriate The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls and I I other landscaping I Attomey's or owner's certification of ownership � ❑ ❑ Viewsheds: i Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site, describe and map ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by i development of the site Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent off-site ❑ I ❑ locations Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: The proposed width ❑ ❑ Treatment of curbs and gutters,of other storm water control system if other than [ J ❑ ❑ curb and gutter is proposed Sidewalk systems ❑ ❑ Bikeway systems, where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the ❑ ❑ City are proposed Physiographic data,including the following: A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table ❑ ❑ fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with ' 18.78.1203.3.c,BMC Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 feet of ❑ ❑ • the site If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the ❑ ❑ requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted Not withstanding the waiver provisions of '18.78.080.B.9,BMC, at the discretion of the ❑ ❑ City Engineer, a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development. The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses. The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in ' 18.78.0501, BMC If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review,that analysis shall meet this requirement If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ under question,the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed planned unit development A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of - 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application C ❑ Planned Unit Development-Final Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Final Plan Information ' Yes No N/A A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the ❑ ❑ ❑ corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development • A final plan site plan shall be submitted on a 24- by 36-inch sheet(s) at the same scale as the approved preliminary plan.If a different scale is requested or required,a copy of the approved preliminary plan shall be submitted that has been enlarged or reduced to equal the scale of the final plan.However,only the scales permitted for the preliminary plans shall be permitted for final plans. The final plan site plan shall show the following information: Page 4 Land use dagRame information as required on the prelimina plan) ❑ i ❑ ❑ Lot lines,easements,public rights-of-way as per subdivision plat ❑ ❑ ❑ AttomeVs or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ❑ Planning Director certification of approval of the site plan and its conformance ❑ ❑ ❑ with the preliminan,plan Owner's certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on ❑ ❑ ❑ the site plan I A final landscape plan consistent with the conditions and restrictions of the approved ❑ ❑ ❑ preliminary plan shall be submitted. It shall also be consistent with the Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping), BMC, except that any stated conditions and restrictions of the preliminary plan approval shall supersede the provisions of Chapter 18.48(Landscaping),BMC An official final subdivision plat of the site must accompany the final planned unit ❑ ❑ ❑ development plan when applicable. City approval of the final subdivision plat shall be required before issuance of building permits Prior to submission of the final plan to the DRC and ADR staff, engineering plans and ❑ ❑ ❑ specifications for sewer,water, street improvements and other public improvements, and an executed improvements agreement in proper form providing for the installation of such improvements,must be submitted to and approved by the City A plan for the maintenance of open space, meeting the requirements of ' 18.72.040 El ❑ ❑ (Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee), BMC, shall be submitted with an application for final plan approval. Open space shown on the approved final plan shall not be used for the construction of any structures not shown on the final plan Page 5 D x' cn �o • A P P LIGHTING PLAN E N D I X S D 8 • Lighting Plan For Phase I Subdivision of West Winds Planned Community Prepared For: Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 Prepared By: B KM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 March 2004 04S067.110 • Phase I Subdivision-West Winds—Lighting Plan March 5,2004 • Table of Contents Page Purpose ...........................................................................................................................................1 Project Overview........................................... 1 .................................................................................. Existing Conditions Summary ........................................................................................................1 Basisof Calculations.......................................................................................................................2 StreetLighting. ...............................................................................................................................2 UDOCompliance.............................................................................................................................3 Maintenance....................................................................................................................................4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................4 Figures FigureLP-1 - Lighting Plan............................................................................................................5 Appendices • Appendix A—Manufacturer Materials and Photometrics • Page i. E N G IN E EE E E INGM • • Phase I Subdivision-West Winds—Lighting Plan March 5,2004 Purpose This Lighting Plan is prepared for Phase I Subdivision of the West Winds Planned Community per the requirements of Section 18.78.060(R.) of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Project Overview Phase I Subdivision is a portion of the greater West Winds Planned Community, which is a 960- unit mixed use residential development located in the northwest 1/a, Section 2,Township 2 South, Range 5 East,bordered by Oak Street on the south,North 270'Avenue on the east, Baxter Lane on the north, and Davis Lane on the west. Phase I Subdivision is specifically a 31-acre, 182-unit mixed residential plat located at the southeast corner of West Winds. Existing Conditions Summary Phase I Subdivision is currently undeveloped with no on-site lighting. Oak Street lying along the south boundary has been constructed to a 1/2 standard by the adjoining Harvest Creek Subdivision. No street lighting was installed on Oak Street with the exception of(2)24' streetlights on the center median of 27 h Avenue at the intersection with Oak Street(see photo below). w Existing Street Light 271' Avenue & Oak Street Page 1 of 5 ENGINEERING � • • • • 1 � i'I�� ,rye '� �� �� ,�� ,� II�� t� �p ,�, i IM� 'I ', I I �� • • • Phase I Subdivision-West Winds—Lighting Plan March 5,2004 . Basis of Calculations The calculations and recommendations within this plan are based on the regulations set forth in Section 18.78.060(R.) of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. HKM Engineering worked directly with Mr. James E. Armstrong and Mr. Tom Craver,both with Northern Rockies Agency' in lighting product selection and lighting calculations. Mr. Armstrong and Mr. Craver are well-known lighting manufacture representatives with in depth knowledge of Bozeman lighting standards. Street Lighting u To select a street lighting configuration,HKM Engineering initially met with Northern Rockies Agency for an overview of product options and a discussion of which products the City of Bozeman had recently reviewed and approved. Based on this initial meeting, example projects were toured and lighting product and configuration were selected. Gullwing G13 and G18 Area Luminaries were selected for street light luminaries. The G13 will be used for the internal local streets and G18 for the perimeter arterial and collector streets. For poles, a 16' RW Round Non-Tapered Steel Pole was selected for the internal local streets, an 18' RW RSP Non-Tapered Steel Pole was selected for the perimeter streets. I Example G13 Gullwing Luminaire with 16'Pole Installation • 'Northern Rockies Agency,2335 Birdie Drive,Bozeman,MT 587-0513 Page 2 of 5 ENOINEERINO � • • • ,I I, �� I ! � � i � i ', II • I �,- Phase I Subdivision-West Winds—Lighting Plan March 5,2004 • The luminaire/.pole configuration shall be base mounted on a concrete "sonotube type" foundation. The light standards shall be sited as shown on attached Figure LP-1. UDO Compliance The following is an item-by-item review of Section 18.78.060(R.)of the UDO. 1. (a.) Isofootcandle plots are included in the appendix of this plan. (c.) Descriptions,cuts sheets ... -- See appendix of this plan. (d.) Lighting Plan—This plan was prepared in close coordination with Northern Rockies Agency, a well known local lighting manufacture representative. (e.) Lighting calculations—NA, no uniformity requirements for subdivision street lighting within UDO. The following is an item-by-item review of Section 18.42.150(C.)of the UDO. 1. General a. The lighting system shall be operated through a lease back program with Northwest Energy. b. Yard lights are not used for street lighting. 2. Street Lights at Intersections. a. Illumination Requirements • i. Single Installations. Gullwing G13 and G18 Luminaires meet maintained lumen requirements per Table 42-2 for local,collector and arterial streets. . ii. Multiple Installations. NA b. Non-Signalized Intersections. —Street lights are proposed at all internal and perimeter intersections. i. NA ii. NA c. Signalized Intersections. NA, no signalized intersection in Phase I area. 3. Spacing of Street Lights. Streetlights have been placed per Table 42-2 for perimeter collector and arterial streets. Internal local streets have streetlights at all intersections and curves. 4. Street Light Locations and Placement of Equipment. a. Streetlights are placed at all intersections. b. Streetlights are placed within the public R/W within the boulevard strip that should not conflict with buried utilities. c. Streetlights on perimeter streets have been placed for uniformity. d. Streetlights are placed on all internal street curves. e. Streetlights have been place on terminal ends of center medians on 27`h Avenue and Oak Street. f. Streetlight wiring shall be underground . g. NA h. Streetlights on 27`h Avenue alternate from each side. Streetlights on Oak Street • are located on the north side. Either Harvest Creek Subdivision or the City is responsible for the streetlights on the south side of Oak Street. Page 3 of 5 ENGINEERING • Phase I Subdivision-West Winds—Lighting Plan March 5,2004 • 5. Streetlight Support Structures. See appendix for.this plan. Poles are per manufactures recommendations. 6. Pathway Intersection Lighting. A streetlight has been proposed for Oak Street at the intersection with the main north/south path through West Winds Park. Maintenance Northwest Energy will maintain the lighting system through the lease program. The Homeowners Association will pay operating costs of the lighting system. Conclusion This plan establishes that the proposed street lighting system for Phase I of west Winds is in compliance with the pertinent sections of the UDO.The system will provide an appropriate level of lighting for a residential subdivision. • • Page 4 of 5 -TENG LIGHT PLAN Y ' z, P, c�HE- --LANE- -� - I,. J ' I +l i i i i i I I i I � •---I i � �' ILILLL LLLLL ID 1 I•• ! I � j � — I I I !j I I� l � I --1-- •--- 1 �I� ~ - � '� 11,4 ri -;- -- - -FREE-ZE----- -L-ANE---- -L----- � 0 01 P"Mil Jill NOTES BY O WS AND POLES ON SIDE AVE OF 27111 BY OTHERS (TYPICAL). 5(TYP CENTER MEOW SHOWN FOR \ / \� \ .\ �' �1 i ----• I I } , UUSTRAnW PORPOSES ONLY. • I �V \\\W\\ i r i I , eBBL:ES�xvE-a:r LFIRZ ' , —A- - -1 - -— - ---- - —_ `— ss > MH 55 Hi OAK STREET (PRINC/PAL ARTERIAL) _ J I w — __._____-_ _-- _ -_..._._._.._ _____________..__ ___._------ - 1 j- }---------•---.........----- � �.. LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y PROP ROPOSED OAD w�WAY NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. �� "' PROPOSED LOT LINE — GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PROPOSED LOT LINE °I !N O 1 N t R 1 N O PROPOSED ROAD CENTERLINE HKM Engtneedng Inc. EOSiWC NEnANDS McChesney Profmlonal Bldg. � T Ct,�RE r LIGHTING PL A N a. 601"s Dr.,Sulte 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 CULLWNG C18 WTH 20' c SUPPORT STRUCTURE H (�)586-M 100 0 100 FIGURE LP-1 FAX(406)586-1730 DATE FEB.28.2004 PROJECT NO.04SC67.1110 0 Owri It 0 2004 HIW Engin—ing Inc„A8 Right.R."d. MANUFACTER MATERIALS AND PHOTMETRICS • GULLWING G13 AND G18 AREA LUMINAIRES GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Gullwing is an area luminaire defined by its sleek profile and rugged construction. Available in two sizes,the housing is one-piece,diecast aluminum and mounts directly to a pole or wall without the need of a separate support arm.The multifaceted arc-image duplicating optical systems provide IES Types I,ll,III,IV and V distributions. The door frame is single-piece diecast aluminum and retains an optically clear tempered flat glass lens.The luminaire is completely sealed and gasketed preventing intrusion from moisture, dust and insects.The Gullwing luminaires are finished with a fade and abrasion resistant TGIC powdercoat. O R D E R I N G PREFIX CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS G18 1 2XL 250HPS 27T BRP PCB G13 1 1 r era"� G18 120 BRP F Single Assembly Type 1,Honzonfal(amp 50MH' 100MHe 250PSMH' 208 BLP LF (G18 pole mounting only. 70MH 150MHe 320PSMH9 G18 2 NIA above 400w) 240 WP PC Twin @ 180' 100 MH 175MH 35OPSMH 277 NP PCR 2XL 150MH 250MH 400PSMHL10 2@90 Type 11,Horizontal Lamp 175MH 400MH2 75OPSMH3•e 347 OC POLY Twin @ 90° 3XL 1000MH''1000PSMH' 480 SC HS 3 Type lll.Horizontal Lamp 50HPS' QS Triple @ 90, 4XL 70HPS 150HPS RPA1 3@120 Type IV Horizontal Lamp ir 100HPS 250HPS RPA2 Triple @ 120' Q 150HPS 400HPS PTF2 4 Type V,Horizontal Lamp .. 600HPSPTF3 Quad Assembly (G18 only.N/A above 400w) MH Metal Halide 750HPS' PSMH Pulse Start Metal Halide PTF4 W HPS" High Pressure Sodium SQPTF Wag Mount Recessed J-Bar 7. Requires SG 1. 120 and 277V only. M100tUPSIUBT37lamp WS 2. Requires ED28 or BT28 reduced jacketed lamp 8.M138 or M153 SQPA Wall Mount Surface Conduit 3. Furnished with sag glass lens only 9. M132 or M154 SPA 4. Requires BT37reduced jacketed lamp 10.M135 orM155 S. Venture mogul base lamps required 11.All G13 optics require 6. M149 only.Requires MS750/PS/BU-HORBT37lamp.medium base lamps. FINISH: OPTIONS: BRP Bronze Paint F Fusing(In Head) RPA2 4"and 5"Round Pole Adapter BLP Black Paint (N/A with 750w and 1000w) (G18 only.Required ror4'-5'OD round poles) WP White Paint LF In-Line/In-Pole Fusing PTF2 Pole Top Fitter-2 3/8"Dia.Tenon NP Natural Aluminum Paint PC ... Photocontrol and Receptacle PTF3 Pole Top Fitter-3-3 1/2"Dia.Tenon OC Optional Color Paint (N/A with 480V.1000w maximum combined PTF4 Pole Top Fitter-3 1/2-4"Dia.Tenon Specify RAL designation as luminaire wattage) SQPTF Square Pole Top Fitter shown in Color Selection Guide. PCR' ''Photocontrol Receptacle only SPA Square Pole Adaptor ex:OC-RAL7024 POLY Polycarbonate Sag Lens (G13 only.Required for straight square poles) SC Special Color Paint (913-100wmax;.G18-250w:max.) (Specify Must supply color chip; HSH-Internal Houseside Shield Q S Quartz_Standby (G13-100w max;G18-400w max) SG Sag Glass Lens(In lieu of eat glass) (Supplied standard with 750w and 1000w) RPA1 3"Round Pole Adapter (G 18 only.Required for 3'OD round or tapered round poles where top OD is less than 4'.) TYPE PREFIX CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro,CA 94577 800/227-0758 51 510/35357-69006900 in California Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of Fax:510/357-3088 the company's continuing product Improvement program.The Gullwing design Is protected by U.S.patent number sitelighting.com DES.391.659.The XL optical system is protected by U.S.patent number 5690422. 0 ©Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001.All Rights Reserved.International Copyright Secured. Genlyte Thomas Group LLC LIGHTING 79115-85/1203 • • • � � I � , I� f 1 � �� �� �I',h • ;'� � i GULLWING G13 AND G18 AREA LUMINAIRES SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Gullwing is an area luminaire OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented optical systems are defined by its sleek profile and rugged construction.The housing is manufactured from homogenous sheet aluminum which has been one-piece, diecast aluminum and mounts directly to a pole or wall electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The without the need of a separate support arm.The multifaceted arc- multifaceted arc image duplicating systems are designed to image duplicating optical systems provide IES Types I, II, III, IV and V produce IES Types 1 (1), II (2XL), III (3XL), IV(4XL),and V(Q). distributions.The door frame is single-piece diecast aluminum and With the 2XL, 3XL and 4XL luminaries, the reflector facets form a retains an optically clear tempered flat glass lens.The luminaire is conical fan around the arc tube with each facet positioned to be completely sealed and gasketed preventing intrusion from moisture, precisely tangent to the top of the arc tube. dust and insects.The Gullwing luminaires are finished with a fade and The lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell. abrasion resistantTGIC powdercoat. Position-oriented mogul base sockets to accept high output HOUSING:A one-piece diecast aluminum housing mounts directly to a horizontal metal halide lamps are supplied standard on G18 units. pole or wall without the need for a support arm.The low profile rounded G13 units feature porcelain medium base lampholders. form reduces the effective projected area of the luminaire to only.8 ft2 ELECTRICAL:All electrical components are UL recognized,factory for the G13 and 1.2 ftz for the G18. tested, and mounted on a unitized plate with quick electrical disconnects. Each high power factor ballast is the separate LENS ASSEMBLY:A single-piece diecast aluminum lens frame hinges component type capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to down from the housing and is secured by a stainless steel lanyard and -20(F). hinge pin. FINISH:Each standard color luminaire receives a fade and abrasion An optically dear,heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass lens is resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured, triglycidal mechanically secured with six(G13)or eight(G18) retainers. The isocyanurate (TGIC)textured polyester powdercoat finish.Standard electrical and optical chambers are thoroughly sealed with a one-piece colors include bronze (BRP), black(BLP),white(WP), and natural memory retentive hollow-core EPDM gasket to prevent intrusion by aluminum(NP).Consult factory for specs on optional or custom colors.. moisture,dust,and insects. LABELS:All fixtures bear UL or CUL(where applicable)Wet Location labels. D I M E N S I O N S A _ < B C D EPA(W) A B C D 1 2 3/4 G13 22 1/2" 13 1/2" 4 3/4" 8 1/2" .8 1.6 2.2 57.25 cm 34.16 cm 12.14 cm 21.54 cm G18 31 1/2" 18" 6 1/2" 11 1/2" 1.2 2.4 3.2 80.01 cm 45.72 cm 16.66 cm 29.21 cm 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro,CA 94577 • 5101357-0758 6900 510/35T-6900 in California Garden Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of Fax:510/357-3088 the company's continuing product Improvement program.The Gullwing design is protected by U.S.patent number sitelighUng.com DES.391.659.The XL optical system is protected by U.S.patent number 5690422. 9 0 Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001.All Rights Reserved.International Copyright Secured. Genlyte Thomas Group LLC LIGHTING 79115.8511203 it • • a i t it `' �� i ` � ` , 1 III I� I • �� � I A i • Page 1 of 2 AM AW AMWe • RSP Round Non-Tapered Steel Poles Pole Shaft The pole shaft is one piece construction, being fabricated from a weldable grade carbon steel structural tubing which has a uniform wall thickness of 11 gauge(0.1195")gauge.The pole shaft material shall conform.to ASTM A-500 Grade C with a minimum yield strength of 50,000 psi.The pole shaft has a full length longitudinal resistance weld and is uniformly cylindrical in cross-section with round sides and excellent torsional properties. Base Plate The anchor base is fabricated from a structural quality hot rolled carbon steel plate that meets or exceeds a minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi.The anchor base telescopes the pole shaft and is circumferentially welded top and bottom.All welds are performed in accordance with the American Welding Society specification AWS D1.1,latest edition. Bolt Circle: 8.00"Sq. Dim. :8.00"Thickness:b.75"Conduit Opening: 3.00" Anchor Bolts Anchor bolts are fabricated from a commercial quality hot rolled carbon steel bar that meets or exceeds a minimum yield strength of 55,000 psi.'Four properly sized anchor bolts,each with two regular hex nuts and washers,are furnished and shipped with all poles unless otherwise specified.Anchor bolts shall have the threaded end galvanized a minimum of 8 inches in accordance with ASTM A-153. Fully galvanized anchor bolts are available upon request. Handhole An oval reinforced gasketed handhole, having a nominal 2"x 4"or 3"x 5" inside opening,located 1'-6" above base, is standard on all poles.A grounding provision is welded inside the handhole ring. ril Job Name: West Winds Planned Community _ j Series:RSP - Round Non-Tapered Steel Poles Nominal Height: 16' Base Diameter: 4.0" Gauge: 11 Finish: COLOR - Type unavailable unavailable Mounting Designation / Options: DM10-BC Drilled fort Luminaire, Base Cover Height Pole Shaft Handhole Anchor Bolt Bolt 80 90 100 Shlp hype (ft.) (in.)x(in.)x(ft.) Gauge Size (in.)x(in.)x Circle MPH MPH MPH WT. (in.) (in.) (in.) (ft. ) 16 4.00x16.0 IE1=1 0.75x17x3 16.5 13.2 10.6 93 RSP16-4.0-11-COLOR-DM10-BC Please type your comment below. (Max. 300 characters) • IC- i httD://www.kwindustries.com/online/SubmitSheet2.asD 2/24/2004 i • • • • 1 { fil I { 1 A �� I �,i � � • I 1 t Page 1 of 2 • RSP Round Non-Tapered Steel Poles Pole Shaft The pole shaft is one piece construction,being fabricated from a weldable grade carbon steel structural tubing which has a uniform wall thickness of it gauge(0.1195")gauge.The pole shaft material shall conform to ASTM A-500 Grade C with a minimum yield strength of 50,000 psi.The pole shaft has a full length longitudinal resistance weld and is uniformly cylindrical in cross-section with round sides and excellent torsional properties. Base Plate The anchor base is fabricated from a structural quality hot rolled carbon steel plate that meets or exceeds a minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi.The anchor base telescopes the pole shaft and is circumferentially welded top and bottom.All welds are performed in accordance with the American Welding Society specification AWS D1.1, latest edition. Bolt Circle:8.00" Sq. Dim. :8.00"Thickness:0.75"Conduit Opening: 3.00" Anchor Bolts Anchor bolts are fabricated from a commercial quality hot rolled carbon steel bar that meets or exceeds a minimum yield strength of 55,000 psi. Four properly sized anchor bolts,each with two regular hex nuts and washers,are furnished and shipped with all poles unless otherwise specified.Anchor bolts shall have the threaded end galvanized a minimum of 8 inches in accordance with ASTM A-153. Fully galvanized anchor bolts are available upon request. • Handhole An oval reinforced gasketed handhole, having a nominal 2"x 4"or 3"x 5" inside opening, located 1'-6" above base, is standard on all poles.A grounding provision is welded inside the handhole ring. RS P Job Name: West Winds Planned Community Series:RSP - Round Non-Tapered Steel Poles Nominal Height: 18' Base Diameter: 4.0" Gauge: 11 Finish: COLOR - Type unavailable unavailable Mounting Designation / Options: DM10-BC Drilled for 1 Luminaire, Base Cover Height Pole Shaft Handhole Anchor Bolt Bolt 80 90E(ft Ship Type (ft.) (In.)x(in.)x(ft.) Gauge Slze (in.)x(In.)x Circle MPH MPH 1AlT. (in.) (In.) (in.) (ft. ) (ft. ) [Ell4.00x18.0 11 2 x 4 0.75x17x3 E 13.7 10.8 8.6 IEEI RSP18-4.0-11-COLOR-DM10-BC Please type your comment below. (Max. 300 characters) i htti)://www.kwindustries.com/online/SubmitSheet2.ast) 2/24/2004 i • • • J I, { iJ: M i �r {� �� ;,� �ht yh �� F i� 1� 0.05 • 0. .2 0. 2 i / I i Photometric File: F:IIES FileslThomas Outdoor IESIGardcoIGuilwing1G33X1H8KoMate: 2/26/2004 The following data comes from the above photometri;fde: Maximum Point: 3.02 fc (Test lumens may be listed below. The Lamp Lumens to the rignt were used in the calcs.) EMounting.Height:=17 ft. IESNA:LM-63-1995 Lamp Lumens:9500 [TEST]99-7992S Light Loss Factor: T.6 [MANUFAC]GARDCO LIGHTING G33X1.HS.IES 07/7./99 [LUMCAT]G13/3XLI1C0W HPS W/H.S.S _� [ScaIi 1"=^1 TF_eei� [LUMINAIRE]STANDARD TYPE III(3X]OPTICS WITH I NTERNAL H.S.S.-STD PROD. - [MORE]CLEAR FLAT TEMPERED GLASS IN STANDARD DOOR FRAME. Fixture Arrangement:Single [MORE] Temp-Life©1997, The ScreenMaker.All rights reserved. • • l • I. ''� ii Ii � � +�� '� ��E � ! II� I� !� +1 I 0.05 0.1 0. 1 C Photometric File: NIES FileslThomas Outdoor IES1GardcolGullwinglGW3X191NIE®te: 2/26/2004 The following data comes from the above photometric fi,'e. Maximum Point: 3.16 fc (Test lumens may be listed below. The Lamp Lumens to tie right were used in the calcs) Mounting Height: 20 ft. IESNA:LM-63-1995 Lamp Lumens: 16000 [TEST]97-6140 Light Loss Factor: 12.8 [MANUFAC]GARDCO LIGHTING GW3X15HS.IES 2/11197 [LUMCATfGULLWINGG1813XL/,150HP.S/HS W/INTERVAL H.S.S. [SC81e: 1"=20 F,eet [LUMINAIRE]STANDARD TYPE III(3XL)OPTICS(18")V'//INTERNA!HOUSE SIDE SHIELD [MORE]CLEAR FLAT TEMPERED GLASS IN GARDCO GULLWING DOOR FRAME Fixture Arrangement: Single [MORE] Temp-Lite©1997, The ScreenMaker.All rights reserved. Chapter 5 MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT West Winds—Preliminary�'lanned Unit Development March 5, 2004 • Chapter 5 —Master Environmental Document The following is a"Master Environmental Document"for the West Winds Planned Community that addresses the following elements. • Landforms; • Geology; • Hydrology; • Soils; • Vegetation; • Noxious Weeds; and • Wildlife This information set forth below is intended for use in permitting the entire West Community including the Phase I subdivision and all subsequent subdivision and site plan phases. The design of the proposed Community is guided by and responsive to the environmental features of the site. This chapter provides a generalized description and assessment of the development implications of the various environmental features of the land included within the project boundary. Development guidelines and standards used in the formulation of the project are also summarized for each environmental factor. Topics addressed are: landforms, slope and topography; geology; hydrology; soils; vegetation; noxious weeds and wildlife habitat. a. Landforms,Slope and Topography p y The proposed West winds Community is located on a relatively flat parcel of land with a consistent slope of 1.2% to the north (see Figure 5.1 —U.S.G.S. Site Topography Map). There is only minor ground topography variation due to existing Farmers Canal irrigation ditches that bisect the site flowing south to north (see Figure 5.2 -- Water Features). • West Winds Project Site with Irrigation Ditches Page 5-1 ENOINEE EE IN� ��fi �i • I' '1 j` i i} �� i' 1f 1� r�, II i; �� �� �� �k ;� �� ���� ��� ,� ��a, n �} I, • �r • 0 • I� i� ' � �� (,14 I` � { 1h i� ��J7+i f`l � I �` � ` � I'' • �� S t 1 1, 0 0 West Win —P Planned Unit Development March 5 2004 Winds Preliminary U t p ent , Development Guidelines and Standards • Maximize preservation of center abandoned Farmers Canal irrigation ditch vegetation corridor within West Winds Park for enjoyment of residents; b. Geology The Gallatin valley is an intermountain basin in the Rocky Mountains bounded by the Bridger and Gallatin Ranges to the East and South. The Gallatin Mountain Range has provided material for vast coalescing alluvial fans deposited upon the valley floor from the South and East valley limits, sloping rather steeply to the North. These alluvial/fluviatile deposits range from Tertiary to Quaternary in age. The project site is located on the Northwest side of Bozeman on Quaternary age alluvial deposits known as the Bozeman Fan:'The alluvial fan deposits typically consist of varying thickness of silty clay and silt overlaying sandy gravel and cobble at depth. The site topography slopes gently to the North with an irrigation ditch bisecting the area and providing drainage to the North. Groundwater levels in this area are driven by cyclical irrigation and range from 2-3 feet below surface in the late spring and summer to 4-9 feet below the surface in late fall and winter. The soil profiles encountered at the site consist of topsoil and lean clay, silt, and silty clay overlaying gravel. Topsoil varies in thickness from 10 to 12 inches. The fine-grained clay and silt deposits extend from 4 to 6 feet in thickness and are typically firm in consistency and high in • natural moisture. Gravel is encountered at depths ranging from 4 to 6 feet. The gravel ranged in visual classification from clayey gravel with sand and cobbles to poorly graded gravel with sand and cobbles. The gravel is generally dense in consistency and high in natural moisture. HKM Engineering conducted a geotechnical investigation of the project site. The recommendations resulting from this investigation are given below. A copy of the report, Geotechnical Investigation Report for West Winds Planned Community, Bozeman Montana, is included in Appendix D. Development Guidelines and Standards • Advise potential buyers of the availability of the Geotechnical Report and depth to groundwater. • Discourage basements due to shallow groundwater. • Footing on native gravel or structural fill • Require dewatering of utility installations. • Specify surfacing sections for public and private streets. • Larger structures such as the skilled nursing facility and apartment to require site-specific geotechnical evaluations. Page 5-3 MLJEA�AS ENOINEEIINO � f • i F �� ,,. +i � f i ,i I � • f I { i West Winds—Preliminarytanned Unit Development • March 5, 2004 • c. Hydrology Irrigation Ditches There are three irrigation ditches within the project area(see figure 5.2—Water Features). Only one of the three irrigation ditches is active and according to Bob Davis, President of the Farmers Canal Ditch Company the remaining two easterly irrigation laterals of the Farmers Canal can be abandoned. The most westerly ditch, known as the Section line ditch, is the only active irrigation lateral and flows along the very west property line of the site. -----f` The Section Line Ditch is proposed to be slightly realigned to lie within the center road median of Davis Lane. %�:..;'� •L huh.ax:`? : d Y On-Site Irrigation Laterals—Section Line Ditch (left), Farmers Canal Ditch Laterals (right) The center irrigation ditch (abandoned lateral of Farmers Canal) has long been abandoned by the ditch company and has grown-up with brushy vegetation and is delineated as a jurisdictional wetland. The easterly ditch (current extension of Harmon ditch through Harvest Creek subdivision)is a waste ditch and does not serve any water rights to the north. This easterly ditch will be abandoned and the waste irrigation flow re-directed into the center cannel. The routing of this flow into the center channel will benefit the wetland vegetation. Page 5-4 E NGINEEEIN0 41 —J BAXTER LANE_ 3� 2 — — — — — — — — — — _ I � BB 1 � 2 I I I I I W-2 I I IRRIGATION CANAL I I (Farmers Canal) , IRRIGATION CANAIJ I (Farmers Canal).— SECTION LINE DITCH I (Farmers Canal) I II 1 BE-2 I ` I I W-2 SP-5 BB AND LAND. ., I I SP-4 COMPLEX 1 I I } -4 I 1313-1 I H SP-3 I 2 i^ I I I W-3 SP-7 ASP F . vw € —2 a`I i I W 1 t, , Sp-1 r NOTE: I , SP-2 WETLAND DEUNEAT(ON I SP-1Q 7 BY LAND AND WATER ' SP-11 a�rairs _ SP- OAK STREET _ r�T CENTER OF S. 2 -� CuL7mff C- I I _ BB-1 r is LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y BED Wt EAWc NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., RX.E., P.M.M. H� eBED.BA a LW 00104M LW W&M 2 GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA lNOlNIllINO w'1 —,.,— KM En&eedny bc. ® —N— W-2 McChesney ProfeWonal WE,. WA TER FEA TURES 601 Res Dr.,Suite 22 Bozeman W 59715 (406)58&M 200 0 200 FIGURE 5.2 FAX(a)586-IM 6 led$ test OATS FEEL 27.2004 PROJECT NO.04S007.110 Csppight 0 2004 WOW EnglenMg Inc..AU Rights Ruarvsd. - . 1 • • • ��. �I IF �k ,� +� p �� �. � � ,� 1 �� • Ip 4� West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5 2004 Development Guidelines and Standards • Covenants and restrictions will preclude use of irrigation ditch water by lot owners; and • Relocation of existing ditch alignments will be coordinated with Farmers Canal Ditch Company and constructed to industry standards. Storm and Melt Water Drainage The project site does not have any perennial watercourse within its boundaries. Pre-development storm and melt water drainage is provided by sheet flow, shallow concentrated and irrigation ditch conveyance. Storm and melt water that does not percolate into the on-site soil is collected by either the abandoned center irrigation ditch or roadside ditches along the south side of Baxter Lane. The collected water is then conveyed away from site by the Farmers Canal irrigation ditch flowing north away from the site (see photo below). • Farmers Canal Irrigation Ditch at Baxter Lane HKM Engineering has prepared a Stormwater Report for the West Winds Community. The recommendations resulting from this investigation are given below. A copy of the report, Stormwater Investigation Report for West Winds Planned Community, Bozeman Montana, is attached in Appendix E. Development Guidelines and Standards • Stormwater release from the site will be limited to a peak flow matching the 10-year pre- development storm; • Storm peak flows shall be controlled by storm water detention ponds; • Page 5-6 ENGINEERING AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII West Winds—Prelimin Planned Unit Development 0 March 5, 2004 �'Y P • Stormwater conveyence facilities shall be sized to handle a 25-year post-development storm; and • Stormwater improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Bozeman,MDEQ and MPW standards. Flood Hazard Evaluation No flood hazards exist within the project limits. The site is not within any known published flood boundaries. Wetlands Land &Water Consulting, Inc. (LWC) conducted a wetland and waters of the U.S. delineation of the West Winds Community project site in July 2003. The delineation was for the entire 161.3- acre West Winds site. A complete Wetland Delineation Report and map is included in Appendix F. Wetland types within the project site are classified as riverine and depression under the Hydrogeomorphic classification system (Smith and others 1995). Under the Cowardin system (Cowardin et. al. 1979), the systems are classified as riverine and palustrine wetlands. Two (2) riverine (BB-1 &2), three depression (W-1, 2, and 3), and a riverine/depression complex (BB/WL-1) were delineated within the subject property. The wetland acreage totals 3.07 acres. The COE has verified the wetland delineation and determined the jurisdictional status of the wetlands; a copy of the COE correspondence is included in Appendix F. One ditch within the property, BB-1, appears to have been constructed in upland, however, it conveys groundwater and is therefore jurisdictional. The Section Line ditch is constructed in upland and is non- jurisdictional. The wetland complex, BB/W-1, is jurisdictional because it is connected to what is now called Cattail Creek, a tributary to the East Gallatin River. Wetlands 1 and 2 are approximately 40 and 20 feet from waters of the U.S (BB-1 and BB/W-1,respectively) and are therefore considered adjacent and jurisdictional. Wetland 3 is 250 feet from a non jurisdiction waterway(BB-2, Section Line ditch), and is therefore non jurisdictional. Development Guidelines and Standards • The jurisdictional wetlands have been preserved within West Winds Park. • Minimize road crossing to reduce filling of jurisdictional wetlands. Groundwater Groundwater in the vicinity of the planning area is primarily found in coarse to fined grained sediments that range in size from boulders to clay. These sediments were deposited in the form of alluvial fans from later Tertiary to early Quaternary time. (Slagle 1995.) • Page 5-7 ENGINEEZING -- GROUND WATER West Winds—Preliminary-Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Within the project site, a series of nine (9) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed on April 8, 2003 (See Figure 1). Construction consisted of placing a 3" diameter PVC perforated sewer pipe in a soils investigation test pit. After installation of the monitoring pipe the test pit was backfilled with native material. A complete Groundwater Report with mapping and Soil logs of each test pit along with a description of each monitoring wells construction are included in Appendix G. • The depth to groundwater ranges from approximately 2 feet below ground surface to 10 feet below ground surface. Groundwater becomes shallower from south to north across the site, and is also shallower in the topographically low-lying areas. • Groundwater levels in the southern and western portions of the site rose during the spring and early summer. The maximum fluctuation observed was approximately 3 feet at MW- 9. This rise and subsequent decline in groundwater levels was in close correlation to the time period that the Baxter Border Irrigation ditch was flowing. • Groundwater levels generally declined in the central and northeast portions of the site during the monitoring period. Development Guidelines and Standards • Foundations should be crawl- space type, basements are discouraged due to depth to groundwater; • Utility install ation.will require de-watering by the utility contractor; d. Soils Soils data for the planning area are excerpted from the Soil Survey of Gallatin County and included in Appendix G (Natural Resources Conservation Service, issued 2002). The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is an agency within the US Department of Agriculture with responsibility for a comprehensive soil mapping and interpretation program. According to NRCS data, there are three soil types within the project area as shown in Figure 5.3 —NRCS Soils Map and classified as follows: • 53B Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes • 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes • 511A Fairway silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Page 5-8 EJEAFMAR E N G IN E E II NG 2 542A i I --I,iIRRssRIIIiiIIIs r-- 57B 510 I I I B � — �►� 509BI it 50B W I I I I ER LANE 34 - - 35 _ _ *- TE AL _ BAX c LANE (MINOR AR—_ I _— ------ -- _—_—_— t 50B 53B� L--------� �J 4 II I 5p7A I e 510BIL-- i . ,41 9) !Ilk 510BI , 1 1 6"R 53B s r — ---- ------ -- OAK RFET (PR lPAL RTER/ALJ------ nl CE ER OF S.2 1�510B i t i i III 45i7A III 50B III I �i A I ► I !i 1111 LEGEND WES T WINDS COMMUNI T Y W OL SM -AMS1BLAC DA SILT L''"" NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. a 5JB -AMSTERDAY 9LT LOAM 3 STRAW LOAM H 578 -TURNER LOAM 64B GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA - ENGINEERING 457A-TURNER LOAM,MODERATELY WET -N- 5098 -ENBAR LOAM HKM Engineering Irc. 5108 -MEADOWCREEX LOAM McChesney Professionol Bldg. 511A -FAIRWAY SILT LOAM MRCS SOIL MAP 601 NiMes Dr.,Suite 2 Bozemon,MT 59715 9 1406)586aU 200 FIGURE 5.3 G FAX(406)586-1730 i sods feet DATE FELL 77,2004 PROJECT NO.045067.110 a Copyright 0 2004 HKM En&eeMg Inc,AN Rights Rsswvo& _ st ` _, REVIEW CRITERIA 4 3 y. b , West Winds—Preliminary Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 In general, these soils can be aggregated into the general landform category of outwash plain. Outwash plain landform deposits are located over the entire project area and consist of relatively flat-lying (0 to 4 percent slopes) soil deposits comprised of silty loam, sand and silty gravel. Silty loam, sand and silty gravel are present throughout the greater Bozeman area and pose no serious limitations on development. e. Vegetation (Agriculture) The property is currently used for agricultural hay cropland. The parcel is highly productive with a shallow ground allowing for a non-irrigated hay crop. The parcel is no longer within a viable farm unit. It is estimated that 80% 161.3 —acre is hay production (129-acres), and 20% is perimeter roads, fence boundaries and irrigation features. The general area has historically been agriculture (hay and livestock) been has seen substantial development pressure over the last decade and has become residential in use. There are no perimeter fences that currently protect adjoining agricultural (livestock) operations. Family pet control will be accomplished by practice typical to incorporated areas within the City Limits. There are several scrub-shrub communities interspersed with mature trees. Emergent wetland species proliferate the drainage bottoms (see Figure 5.4—Vegetation Map). There are three (3) drainages (irrigation laterals) within the property: the unnamed irrigation lateral (eastern most), the central irrigation lateral, and the Section Line ditch along the western property border. The unnamed eastern irrigation lateral and central irrigation lateral are stable systems and convey minor quantities of surface water. The eastern lateral is currently used to convey waste irrigation water and the central lateral has no recent evidence of water conveyance. The Section Line ditch is a major conveyance channel of the Farmers' Canal Ditch Company and is also used for emergency stormwater conveyance. Development Guidelines and Standards • Avoidance and minimization methods were used to minimize impacts to critical plant communities and wetlands within the property. Streets within the West Wind Community were relocated to fit the drainage patterns within the property, i.e. shifted to cross a drainage in an area with vegetation diversity. The central scrub-shrub drainage will be preserved as open space parkland. f. Noxious Weed Management and Re-vegetation Plan A noxious weed survey was conducted on September 24, 2003. Five (5) noxious weed species were identified (Table 5.1). Infestation areas and/or individual plants have been mapped in Appendix H—Noxious Weed Management and Re-Vegetation Plan. Canada thistle was observed most•often throughout the property; the infestation was not concentrated in any particular location but dispersed along and within the ditch and shrub communities. Because Canada thistle occurs fairly consistently throughout the property it was not mapped. Houndstongue was also observed as scattered individual plants and was not mapped; less than twelve (12) houndstongue plants were observed. Page 5-10 E N G I N E E t IE E t I N QI it LGEND------ -- ,. 6AXTER LANE_ S-S - Scrub Shrub FOR - Forested EM - Emergent Wetland I Vegetation II i EM I g UN-NAMED I I IEM/S-S IRRIGATION I I FOR LATERAL SECTION LIFE I I DITCH I I I I S-S EM I I I I I i I I I JI I I I 'III FOR S I 1�4j QI I -S tj EM . , .I I FOR I I I I S—S r IEM/S-S I I u I I S-V7 I � I OAK STREET WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2S., R.5.E., P.M.M. GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA N OINIllINO � -rf- '�"" s `�"9 Inc VEGETA T/ON MAP MCChesney?rofeA6nol Bldg, 601 N&,Dr,.Suffe 2 Bozemar W59115 (4U)586,8 U 200 0 200 FIGURE 5.4 3 FAX(406)W-1730 iiiia ads lal DATE.FEE.27.2004, PRQECT N0.OtSO17.110 6 Cap)dot 0 2M NI01 EnginaAnq Ina,A7 R:ghtb Re„rvmd. .- • 1 Ii i I � II I � C f I � 'I West Winds—Prelimin Planned Unit Development • March 5, 2004 az'Y P Table 5.1. West Winds Community noxious weed summary Species Scientific Name Abbreviation' Category2 Relative Percent — Cove? Canada Thistle Circium arvense CIRARV 1 99 Cynoglossum Houndston ue offininale CYNOFF 1 1 Poison Hemlock Conium maculatum CONMAC IV <1 Spotted Kna weed Centaurea maculosa CENMAC I <1 Musk Thistle Cardus nutans CARNUT IV <1 ' Abbreviations are used on the map (Figure 1)to indicate primary locations. 2 Categories I through III are a State of Montana designation with Category I being the most severe. Category 4 is a Gallatin County designated list. s Relative percent cover is an indication of dominance within the noxious weed vegetation classification on the property,i.e.:Canada thistle is the most dominant noxious weed of the 5 species observed. A Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan has been completed and is included in Appendix H. g. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat' Species. Both mule and white-tailed deer(Odocoileus hemionus and virginianus,respectively) have been observed within the vicinity of the Section Line Ditch. Dens were noted in the embankment of the ditch that are likely a result of red fox (Vulpes vulpes). • Ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) have been observed within the central scrub-shrub drainage area. Migratory bird use, particularly warblers,Pine Siskins (Carduelis pinus), American Robins (Turdus migratorius), and other short-distance migrants such as Downy and Hairy Woodpeckers (Picoides pubescens and villosus,respectively) and Northern Common Flicker(Colaptes auratus), are likely high given the concentration of shrubs and mature cottonwoods along the ditch and drainages. Given the maturity and size of the cottonwoods, Red-tailed(Buteo jamaicensis) and Rough-legged(Buteo lagopus)hawks likely frequent the area. There are no long-term fisheries within the property boundaries. It is possible that individual fish may swim up the Section Line ditch from the Gallatin during the irrigation season,but leave the system as water is gradually decreased in the fall. Critical Areas. The critical wildlife areas include the Section Line Ditch,the central irrigation lateral drainage area, and the three wetland shrub communities. These areas have been highlighted on Figure 5.5 —Wildlife Use Areas. All of these areas are comprised of mature scrub-shrub communities interspersed with mature cottonwoods. The western property boundary is the proposed location for Davis Street, a major thoroughfare for the City of Bozeman; the Section Line Ditch is slated to become the center median of this thoroughfare. It is unknown how much of the vegetation will be preserved along the ditch. The West Winds Community property owner is only responsible for constructing the east side of Davis Street. Once the thoroughfare has been completed, the City of Bozeman may have to consider methods of protecting ungulates from entering this median zone. Page 5-12 ENGINEERING • • z i ail ��I �, I. J`[ I� h �� R I` tl Jai �F. n i 1 i 7:-111 ...... - -.... .. - - - - BAXTER LANE _ III I I UN—NAMED I I ' I ' IRRIGATION I LATERAL 1 SECTION LINE 1' I I DITCH, ! I I II� I v I I I I I2 I ' :•I Iw I � All darkened Areas used by Wildlife a III 5 L� - - - - - - - - - i OAK STREET — WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA �NOIN��lINO � _N_ KMEn s y��oaem n1 slag. WILDLIFE USE AREAS 601 Niles Dr„Suffe2 Bozeman,MT 59715 F�(586-M 2 0 200 FIGURE 5.5 i tads lal OATS FEEL 27,2004 PR=T N0.045067.110 6 Capyiot 9 2004 NI0/EnSInsrinq Ina,At Rights Rasrm& • • i � !4 I �I � f � 1 f, I 1 I •f 1 t West Winds—Preliminary Unit Development • March 5 2004 Y P Pets/Human Activity. The development will cause a decrease in use by ungulates and likely little change in migratory bird use. Game bird densities will likely decrease. Public Access. A public trail system will be incorporated within West Winds Park. There will be public access to the trail system from Oak Street and Baxter Lane, as well as from several points within the development. Protective Measures. The central linear park(West Winds Park)has been designed to contain the jurisdictional wetland which is the prime bird habitat area. Approximately 14% (22.14 acres)of the total 161.3 acres will be parkland and a minimum 9% (14.53 acres) will be open space. J FWP Recommendations. A description of the development has been forward to the MTFWP. Comments are pending. h. Historical No historical elements exist within the planning area. SHPO was sent a copy of the proposal and responded(see Appendix A for SHPO correspondence). If buried historic items are discovered during construction, work will be suspended and SHPO will be contacted. i. View Shed The West Winds Community will have minimal impacts on view shed because of proposed land use and existing topography. Land Use—The proposed land use for West Winds is residential with the exception of the skilled nursing facility. Residential structures typically have minimal impacts on existing view sheds. The multi-family and single-family units will not exceed 2-stories in height. The apartments and skilled nursing facility may be 3-story structures. The exact configuration of the apartments and nursing facilities are unknown at this time. View shed analysis shall be prepared in conjunction with the apartment and nursing facilities Site Plan submittals. Topography—The West Winds planning area and the surrounding area for several miles is essentially flat. This combined with the preservation of the mature vegetation within West Winds Park that will provide natural view shed breaks should effectively mitigate any view shed issue created by the project. • Page 5-14 _EN OINEEMR8 West Winds—PreliminaryPfned Unit Development March 5 2004 P Chapter 6 — Community Facilities, Utilities and Parks • Section 18.78.120.A.1 of the UDO requires that the Applicant provide information on the "available community facilities, utilities and parks'. To provide a complete overview of public service providers,this chapter also includes preliminary information on schools, telephone, and electrical service. Each discussion consists of the following four subsections: Background, including information on the existing capacity and/or level of service; (1) Preliminary information on the infrastructure or services to be provided to the project area, including a preliminary confirmation of the availability of capacity; (2) A preliminary discussion of the phasing of improvements and/or services; and (3) Any projected impacts on infrastructure or services identified by the service provider(s) along with all improvements. Copies of letters obtained from the service providers are contained in Appendix A. The following discussions of infrastructure and services are based on the data shown in Table 6.1,Build-Out Summary. Table 6.1: Build-Out Summary • Lana Use Deudty Estnnatted L' Area-:, Dwelrtng Senior Residential Multi-Family 21.85 11.26 246 Skilled Nursing Facility 6.53 22.98 150 Subtotal 28.38 13.95 396 Residential Single-Family 35.63 5.98 213 Town-House 8.31 11.07 92 Multi-Family 16.22 12.15 197 Apartment 4.75 13.05 62 Subtotal 64.91 8.69 564 Total 93.28 10.29 960 Table Notes: 1.Dwelling unit counts for multi-family family,SNF and apartments estimated based on maximum density. 2.Net land area excludes road R/W and parks. Maximum unit count is used for the discussions of infrastructure and services that follow. The discussions of phasing assume a 12-year build-out. • Page 6-1 E NO IN ER"G � WATER/ SEWER West Winds—Preliminary Pianned Unit Development March 5, 2004 a. Water Supply Backgxound On December 1, 1997 the "XL Limited Partnership Annexation Agreement" annexed the project area into the City of Bozeman. Section 3. "Service Provided" of said annexation agreement states, "The City will, upon annexation, make currently existing and available City services, including water service, sewer service, police protection, and fire protection, available to the XL LEVITTED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXEXATION, as provided by this agreement". Based on this annexation agreement water and sewer service is proposed to be provided by the City of Bozeman municipal systems. The detailed construction plans for the water and wastewater systems for West Winds will be prepared in accordance with the facility plans, and City design standards to assure that the project facilities will be readily integrated into the existing City system. Project Area Water Supply The water supply for West Winds project is proposed to be provided by the City of Bozeman water system. Water mains are currently adjacent to the project. Table 6.2 below summarizes existing mains. Table 6.2—Existing Water and Sewer Mains Street Water Sewer Comment :. �. _ . Main Main Oak Street 1071/12" 20" Sewer main SID 621 Baxter Lane 24" SID 621 North 27th Avenue 10" Water main within projected alignment of N. 27 h along east boundary of project. Davis Lane 12" Water main within projected alignment of Davis Lane along west boundary of project. Buckrake Street 20" SID 621 (Projected) For internal distribution and collection, water and sewer mains will be constructed within the proposed public road R/W or utility easements. Phasin Development of the West Winds project will occur in phases and the water usage will increase according to the amount of residential development in each phase. Sizing of the water main infrastructure for the project Area will be based on a maximum potential development build-out (see Figure 6.1 —Water System Plan). A 12-year build-out is used for purposes of determining infrastructure demands. The 12-year build-out represents a reasonable time frame for build-out of the project and is conservative Page 6-2 E N G I N E E A I N G J 3 3 35 _§AXTER !—ANCFM—INOR ARTERIAL42m ------ ----------------- ............ T 2 pAws 111V AFWA r -24 —7-T-77— _1 _1_j---Li �=p r 01 -4-H++4 4 _j T L---- __j jI _.jA 12'n : j : f4 '7] 11 175M.M. r 4 1 ' ' i �1 I - 1 1 -4 L_4L:�-:i 1 : 1 j Z L-L 1 :t ,4 f —--—-- H-410 —-—-—-—4q— K'i r2 aaww"AAARlL ------ x" PRJrLmw ar# �)X v lam— a -—- -—-—- _77 —-—-—-—-—-— _!!]EFAK TREET (PRINCIPAL A TERIALI d R;j ZTEER TER 12" It 1 1'CENTER OF S'_ 2 LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY DWNC SEWER LINE NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. DOSTING SEWER MANHOLE ---- -- PROPOSED SEWER LINE GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA to G 1 N a a it I G PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE -N- KM Englneeflng Inc. McChesney Professional Bldg. SANITARY SEWER PLAN 601 Nildes Dr.,Suite 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)586aU FIGURE 6.2 200 200 FAX(406)586-1730 PROJECT NO.04SO57AID acde f"t DATE:FEEL 2a.2004 Copyight 0 2DO4 HXM Engln—"It AN Rights Reswwii West Winds—PreliminaryPlanned Unit Development • March 5,2004 P in terms of estimating infrastructure and service demand. This 12-year build-out is equivalent to • an 8.3% straight-line growth. Mitigation Based on the DRC comments from the pre-application submittal review and the Water System Report within Appendix J,the existing City water system has adequate capacity to serve the West Winds project. No off-site system improvements beyond completion of the adjoining perimeter water mains are anticipated for the project. b. Wastewater Collection and Treatment Project Area Wastewater Collection and Treatment Wastewater collection and treatment for the West Winds project will be provided by the City of Bozeman. Sewer mains are currently adjacent to, or bi-sect the project. Table 6.2 above summarizes existing mains. For internal wastewater collection, sewer mains will be built within proposed public road R/W or utility easements. Based on Section 14, "Reserved Sewer Capacity" of the above reference annexation agreement,the project has reserve sewer capacity of 307,200 average daily, a maximum total of 960 residential dwelling units, and an average flow rate of 320 gallons per residential dwelling unit. The 320—gallon/residential dwelling unit/day figure is conservative. • City design standards currently utilize 2.54 persons/dwelling unit and 72 gallons/day/person, or 183 - gallons/day/dwelling unit and 150 gpd/acre for infiltration. Using current standards,West Winds has reserve capacity for 1,548 units. West Winds is currently requesting sanitary sewer service for 960 units. However,West Winds reserves the right to request additional services at a later date, if needed. Phasin Development of the West Winds project will occur in phases and the wastewater generation will increase according to the amount of residential development in each phase. Sizing of the wastewater collection system for the project area will be based on a maximum potential development build-out (see Figure 6.2—Sanitary Sewer Plan). A 12-year build-out is used for purposes of determining infrastructure demands. The 12-year build-out represents a reasonable time frame for build-out of the project and is conservative in terms of estimating infrastructure and service demand.This 12-year build-out is equivalent to an 8.3% straight-line growth. Approximately 100 units, located in the northwest corner of the West Winds Planning area are unable to connect to the"Far West Trunk Main"because of trunk sewer main depth,topography and slope limitations. This will require the northwest corner of West Winds to connect into the future 21" diameter sewer main that will be located within Davis Lane. The City of Bozeman. • Wastewater Facility Plan, dated August 1998,recommends this future 21" diameter Davis Lane trunk main. As mentioned above the XL Annexation Agreement granted service and main capacity for the entire West Winds community into the"Far West Trunk Main". Based on Page 6-5 EN OINEEI W. 9 0 West Winds—PreliminaryPlanner Unit Development March 5, 2004 P preliminary conversations with the City of Bozeman Engineering Department staff and the XL . Agreement, any sewer improvements funded by West Winds,required within Davis lane to service the West Winds project will be eL-gible for impact fee credits. Mitigation Based on the DRC comments from the pre-application submittal review and.the Sewer System Report within Appendix K, the existing City sewer system-has adequate capacity to serve the West Winds project. No off-site system improvements are anticipated for the project assuming the Davis Lane truck main is const_-urted in time for the northwestern phases of the project. c. Storm Drainage Background The project site is currently undeveloped and used for Lay production. The site has no existing underground conveyance or storm water retention facilities. Either the abandoned irrigation lateral that bi-sects the property north to south or the roadside ditch along the south side of Baxter Lane collects existing storm water runoff. The existing storm water exits the property through a culvert beneath Baxter Lane and continues to:flow northerly via the irrigation lateral. Collection, Storage and Release The storm drainage system proposed for the West Win is Community is a combination of subsurface storm drain pipes, detention ponds and continued use of the abandoned irrigation lateral through the property. Figure 6.3 —Storm Water Plan shows the elements and configuration of the storm drainage system for the proj-Ict. The storm water collection and conveyance system will consist of a curb & gutter, catch basins and drainage pipes that will convey the storm water to a series of _ detention ponds located throughout the project �?n"' area. The conveyance system will be design to flow the post- development 25-year storm event. The detention ponds will regulate outflow to a 10-year pre- development rate. The ponds will also • retention time providing for settlement Storm Water Gutfall from West Winds of suspended solids, and biological removal Page 6-b ENOINEE t ING fl • • • � II I 1 �, • I i i West Winds—Preliminary ry P•ned Unit Development • . March 5,2004 of hydrocarbons. The storm water will be released to the abandoned irrigation lateral to exit the • project at the pre-development rate and location. Phasing Phasing of the storm drainage system will be coordinated with the actual development phasing. In order to provide storm drainage for the initial phases of commercial development, construction of at least one of the detention facility cells will occur in the initial phase. Subsequent cells will be added as necessary to provide for adequate detention capacity. Impacts and Mitigation Measures Based on the DRC comments from the pre-application submittal review and the Storm water Report within Appendix L the proposed storm water facilities should effectively mitigate increase storm water flow generated by the project. No off-site system improvements are anticipated for the project. d.Roads Background Arterial and collector standard streets define the perimeter of the West Winds Planned community. Section 18.44.090 of the UDO restricts residential access onto arterial and collector • streets. Therefore, all residential access within West Winds shall be onto internal local streets. Three primary items define the internal local street grid system: • Sensitive Areas—The central irrigation lateral that bisects the project has jurisdictional wetlands (see Appendix F). The Corp of engineers through he 404 Permit process requires minimizing wetland impact. The internal local road system has been design to cross the wetlands at the narrowest points, meeting Corp requirements. • UDO Access—Section 18.44.090 of the UDO requires 660' and 330' access separation onto arterials and collectors,respectively. The internal local street grid has been design to meet these criteria where possible. • Existing Street Alignment—To promote neighborhood connectivity, the internal street system has been designed to match adjoining street alignments. The adjoining streets do not meet UDO access spacing requirements which has caused West Winds to request relaxations in access spacing(see Chapter 3, Subsection h. Requested Relaxations). Page 6-7 ENGINEERING A11111110 i I f wI 100.0' VARIES r`'"w,_ alp r' r.h> f �. ;3 RIGHT—OF—WAY rr :- ;=• � rj . � ,`2�`+;?a 2' MAX. WATER wa: DEPTH '. -1 5 r ----------4.0------- --V------1 r— r LANDSCAPED DETENTION POND SECTION A:A (SEE NOTE 1) • �A� TYPICAL STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITY NOT TO SCALE DETENTION POND NOTES: 1. DETENTION PONDS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED Wl TH TREES ON SLOPES AND SOD. 2. DETENTION PONDS SHALL BE DRY PONDS WITH POS177VE DRAINAGE. J. PONDS SHALL HAVE GRADUAL SLOPE TO FACILITA7E MOWING AND EGRESS. N 1 WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y AM NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. �I GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA 3 ENGINEERING HKM Englneering Inc. S TORM WA TER PL AN # McChesney Professional Bldg. b 601 Nildes Dr.,site 2_ SECTION A:A gBozeman,MT 59715 3 (406)5s6-8&U FIGURE 6.3a FAX 6' � 6 DATE FEEL 27.2004 PROJECT NO.045067.110 Ccppol 11 TOW NIOI EngNem6lq Ina.A0 1001.R--" . West Winds—Preliminary Aned Unit Development • March 5,2004 • Road Improvements Connection to the existing City transportation network will be by existing and proposed arterials, collectors, and local streets. Perimeter streets shall be designed and constructed in compliance with current City Standards and the City Transportation Plan.Table 6.3 summarizes off-site roads that will connect West Winds to the transportation network. Table 6.3—Off-Site Connecting Roadways Street Standard Status/Improvements Oak Street Principal Existing: Fully constructed to east of West Winds, Arterial constructed to 1/2 road standard along south boundary of West winds. Improvements: West Winds to construct remaining north 1/2 of road section along south boundary of community. Tschache Local Existing: Fully constructed adjacent to Home Depot. Lane Street Improvements: West Winds will construct to a local street standard within the project. Baxter Minor Existin : Constructed to rural standard. Lane Arterial. Improvements: West Winds to up-grade south 1/2 of roadway adjacent to project. • Davis Lane Minor Existing: Constructed to rural gravel standard north of Arterial West Winds. Improvements: West Winds to construct east 1/2 adjacent to project. North 27th Collector Existin : Constructed to south of West Winds. Avenue Street Improvements: West Winds to construct west 1/2 adjacent to project. Buckrake Local Existin : Constructed to south of West Winds. Avenue Street Improvements: West Winds will construct to local street standard within project. Hunters Local Existing: Constructed to south of West Winds. Way Street Improvements: West Winds will construct to local street standard within project. Internal lot access will be provided by a local street grid system. Internal public streets will be designed and constructed in compliance with City Standards. The public streets will be either 33', 35' or 40' in width (see Figure 6.4—Road Plan) with curb &gutter and sidewalk. Private streets within multi-family areas shall be 21' wide curb &gutter. During construction, industry standard best management practices (BMP's) will be implemented for erosion and dust control. Typical practices include: liberal use of water trucks for dust control and silt fence and straw bales for erosion control. • Page 6-10 ENGINEEEIN� 0,'.05 Sao. Zc-75 v 10 A. " A -—-—-—-—-—-—-—- —-—-—-—-—-—- --—-—- 3 F- ---T-F--T-T--F-T--T-j- T--T-i—r-7--T � � -- E- I � it J 11 :-4-1-44 4-4, L---- ------- - ----- 77 L--- TIC L---- L $jwH rJ L---- I j j WOVE- II 4-14-1 L I 1 I ( �--- 'I l i i 1 _ -- lij ! L--- 7-::---- ---7-= SS"A�H -------------- ----------------OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL ARTERIALJ --- ---------------------------------- - --- ----------------------------------------------- % :?'AJ-'F F.F5 T CR".'Er. zi.- v I A 5 S I I c ENTER OF F— LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY PROPOSED ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED ROAD CENTERLINE NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.8., R.5.E., P.M.M. PRINCIPLE ARTMAL GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA UWOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR -N- HKM EngY*edng Inc. 40'LOCAL STREET McChesney Professional Bldg. 35•LOCAL STREET ROAD PLAN 601 Wider Dr.,Suite 2 V L�OCAL sTREEr Bozeman,MT59715 (406)58&M 200 0 200 FIGURE 6.4 FAX(406)586-1730 DATE:FEEL.27.2004 PROJECT NQ 045057.110 Copyllot 0 2004 HKW EngLiewing Ina.AN Riots Reserved. West Winds—Preliminanned Unit Development 0 March 5 2004 �'Y P Public streets shall be maintained by the City of Bozeman. The Homeowners Association will • maintain private streets. Appendix I contain the proposed road section for the internal and perimeter roads associated with West Winds. Phasing Road improvements will be phased based on subdivision phasing. e. Parks BackgEound The West Winds Community proposes to have an extensive park corridor(hereafter referred to as West Winds Park) that will split the project north to south. West Winds Park will include both passive and active areas, an extensive trail system that is in compliance with the 2020 Trail Plan, soccer practice areas and a Neighborhood Center. The West Winds project is situated between two community park areas; Rose Park(18.5 acres) to the east and the 100-Acre Regional County Park to the west(See Figure 6.5—Regional Park Plan). Both of these parks, when completed, are intended <' to be community facilities serving the greater Bozeman area. Rose Park is currently undeveloped, the 100-Acre Regional Park is under construction and a YMCA facility is proposed for the southeast corner of the park area. On-Site Park Facilities The West Winds Community has two primary park facilities (See Figure 6.6—Park/Trail West Winds Park Vegetation Corridor Plan); West Winds Park and the Senior Park. West Winds Park is the larger of the two and lies north to south through the center of the community, with a gross area of 21.14-acres dedicated for public use. West Winds Park was designed to meet a variety of design requirements, which include (See Appendix M for Park Plan): • Preservation critical lands --The park configuration has empathized preservation of an abandoned irrigation ditch corridor(lateral of Harmon Ditch,Farmers Canal Ditch Company) that bisects the property south to north. Though man-made, over the years the • ditch lateral has fostered the growth of wetland species creating a jurisdictional wetland corridor through the property (See Wetland Study Appendix F). This wetland corridor has intrinsic aesthetic and passive recreational value that has been preserved. Page 6-12 _EN GINEElINO � West Winds—Preliminar Planned Unit Development March 5, 2004 Y P • Preservation of storm run-off canal—The above mentioned irrigation canal also provides for surface water collection and drainage for a substantial area starting at the ditch head- gate just south of the Gallatin Valley Mall, north through the project. • Community trail connectivity-- West Winds Park is directly north of the Harvest Creek Subdivision park and trail system. This allows for direct connectivity to the trail system through Harvest Creek that continues southerly for approximately 2 miles to the Gallatin Valley Mall. The trail system proposed by West Winds is in compliance with the 2020 Trail Map (See figure 6.7 —Regional Trail Plan). • Passive recreation—Portions of the proposed trail system (south end of park) will he adjacent to the wetland areas and the associated mature vegetation. This provides for a natural passive trail environment for the users. J • .Active recreation—The _ .north end of the park is I P — rimarilY open en area. This - = area will be designated as active recreation areas. Intended uses include such activities as youth soccer practice fields. • Central neighborhood • center location --The center portion of the park will contain the Neighborhood Center. The Neighborhood Renter is intended to be a gathering place for all Existing Trail South of West Winds :esidents of the Through Hunters Way Neighborhood community. Typical activities at the center will include enjoying a neighborhood barbecue, a game of volleyball or host a neighborhood meeting. The community center could also be made available for casual events such as wedding receptions, town meetings, etc. • To allow for all residents of Bozeman and use the community center. Within the West Winds development itself, the transit stops will allow residents an additional option to go from place to place other than the extensive trail system. • Maximize public road frontage—Section 18.50.060 of the UDO requires at a minimum 50% road frontage onto public parks. West Winds Park has 70%public road frontage. • Maximize maintenance efficiency—By aggregating the majority of the required park area into the large 21-acre West Winds Park verses numerous small pocket parks, maintenance efficiency will be significantly improved. This is achieved by reducing the mobilization effort required in moving equipment from park to park, and having a single large irrigation system instead of several system with redundant wells and controllers. Page 6-13 ENOINEEtING � PARK MAP • I I �x i `'�',- {�' � :?`�'' '•:pan �. t A i WEST WINDS WEST WINDS- COMMUNITY ' :� PA RK .`•, ••u 100-A CRE , �I UJJ / ,A REGIONAL, PARK ROSE - osE Pi4 RK 1 �w�1 �n •at ''IY� - q NORTH9TH [ T t i 1t JL 4 IaId kal t 1 t '�,•_GREFNWAY r'+ �__ 1 I `rl '•.'� VALL'EYUNrr, j al '•J HIR.D.C. I MAIN:S s { I - ' t - I EROOISSIDE I r I 1 ! � e71 t I [11I t 'ti s I NEm WPSTCO CK B��•OCK�MPADOWS -pc- T,=lr-,r r 2 I WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y An NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. g El GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA INOINIIlINQ1— -N- x McChesney Professloncl Bldg. I REGIONAL PARK PL A N 601 Niles Dr.,Suite 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 g )406)586'8834 FIGURE 6.5 FAX(406)58&1730 loco a i000 3 � f-t DAM FF3 27,2004 PROJECT N0.o4ws7.110 Capy$ot 9 2004 MOI EngL,—I g Inc„AU Right.R.,a d. —TOTAL PARK AREA 22.14 AC (GROSS) I ,,.��•� I BAN I � PERCENT ROAD FRONTAGE-70% `�) WI I _ I I ti'f'�ai•;�%��,I Q� 1 r•`•'__. I I I `° •{ .... ---- A ^c — —L.a:r — ,.;1 I I ,1�. I fl:?:'_.. rF 4i ,,. � I ..a•• c. _... _•• 1l SO �3 _ 34 35 _ BAXTER LANE (M/NOR ARTER/ Ll 2 -------- — � IFI I I t 1 1 1 i I I it I 1 1 I I - P' a I •', I I I I—__ I I 1 1 1 I I ram- /' I - --- ' J. i L_1..J_J_L_J.1J L-JJ__L_J_L_J sewer_•-- -s�-------� � // I 'I I I I I J C 1 -• I`--_— r I I I 1 ��t__ 1 I I L_1..1._J_I__J_1-J L_J-J--J--L -- --� L----J I _ REGo I,A_/'`,A�r1, ' I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I j `� �� 1 _ ---� ' I I I I •'•J II I �__-� I—f_�•� F -F--�—I i �-f-I -�-f I- ' S uN I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I 1 1 I 1 , `\ `•~ ' I j I•' ? •.� ! II----I �1.1_J_L_L_!� j L.l�._Ll_� I-__ � � �'�J� I i t°� II To r W 1 I jI __ j__ I SENIOR -� I I 2 W I I I �JEIQBORHOOD — --" J CENTER �' 1-ACRE 1 „.,,,,;, \�..�. --- -----I I Q [ I,I , > f - , 11 I l I 11 .. 1 1 1 I � I rs�rr,•r, uN -41 _ sgln+ _ _- ------- --- - —ss._ - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - T - - --------------- ------•-----------------------OAK STREET (PR/NC/PAL ARTERIAL)---_ --- ---------_----------------------- - ^ -------------- ---------- ------_ '1"1 1 -- - ------- - I --ir-- j � a'`� 'I I •:r r..... ... � �i;i?Ui!•Y.;iL'id �', i :,:.� i •�• r- I , j eras:. � I ;.. ^;'' I •Si:..:iilCciilri � I 11 8 I �y iir.aid..:• _ 117 s" fr I I I , II ;.• CENTER OF S. 2 , LEGEND WES T WINDS COMMUNI T Y -"--'- PROPOSECI R]AO WOHT OF WAY NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. ¢ PROPOSED TSAIL SYSTEu PROPOSE'E\SEIIENT GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA --'---- PROPOSES-WT LINE a N O I N a a a I N 0 —•--- PROPOSED ROAD CENMALLNE -N- r0 PROPOSEC OPEN SPACE HKM Englneeft Inc. PROPOSEC P WLS PARK / TRAIL PL A N McChesney Professlonal Bldg. � 09STMG WRANDs 601 Wiles Dr.,Suffe 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 FIGURE 6.6 406)586.8834 FAX(406)586.1730 Soo o Soo 6 �otl, fwt GATE:FEB.27,2004 PROJECT N0.045067.110 Copplot 9 2004 HIOI Englnwrinq Ina,AN RW.t4 RswrvW. a a � 3 to • i A7KON ■ t • i P ■ ■ • a h WES T WINDS COMMUNI T Y • A, anVai u A7 a o a VC DR ■ ■ a f ANN z awlx m - �xs p a x A s 64 z M I. P oA • � wiwmotsr a° 'VAMIT w v X � LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y '"""""""' PROPOSED"�TN1NDS 1R"` " NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T 2.S•, R.5.E., P.M.M. COSMG ADJOINING TRAIL SYSTEM GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA ■MOIN{{■IMO � _N_ "K"' I" REGIONAL TRAIL PLAN McChemeyProfesdonolBldg. ,� �;� 601 NO*Dr.,SUNe 2 /1/'•roa.a e..,.a nr PROPOSED 2020 b C .�. p/n.-.eeur"nn.mao..ae..w TRAIL PLAN ® MTS9715 /V n„-wm..an.m.raa x.co.ev (406)S86�M i'".. °"•�"`°"•"• l000 o taoo FIGURE 6.7 FAX(06)S86.1730 6 •ed• f"t DATE FED.27,2004 PR0.4CT NO.0450{7.1f0 CePy*t 0 2004 NO Englnwtng Ina.AS RI{Ab R,wve& West Winds—Preliminary Aned Unit Development March 5,2004 Park Statistics Tables 6.4 and 6.5 below summarize ark area provided and required under Section 18.50.020 of P P 9 the UDO. Table 6.4-Park Area Provided Park Gross Area Wetlands Stormwater Net Area . Active Passive (Ac.) Area(Ac.) Detention (Ac.)(See Area(%)Area(%) Area(Ac.) Note 1.) West Winds Park 21.14 1.94 0.65 18.55 60% 40% Senior Park 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 100% 0% Total 1 22.14 1.94 0.65 19.55 Table Notes: 1.Park area requirment based on net area. Table 6.5-Park Area Required Description Net Area Unit Count Park Area (Ac.) Required (Ac.) • Known Unit Count Areas 43.94 305.00 9.15 Multi-Famly Areas 49.35 5.43 Total 1 93.281 1 14.58 Table Notes: 1.Park area required on Section 18.50.020 UDO 2.Known unit count areas 0.03 Ac./DU 3.Multi-family areas 11% of net area f.Public Safety Back rg ound This subsection includes preliminary discussions of fire protection, police, emergency medical response and emergency road access. Fire protection will be provided by the Bozeman Fire Department. The Fire Department also provides emergency service response. The closest fire station is located on South 191h approximately 2.5 miles from the project area. The Bozeman Fire Department is a municipal department with a paid professional staff. Police protection will be provided by the Bozeman Police Department.The Bozeman Fire Department is also a municipal department with a paid professional staff. Page 6-17 ENGINEERING West Winds—Preliminary Oned Unit Development • March 5, 2004 • Planning Area Public Safety The following fire protection and emergency service response measures for the Planning Area are incorporated into the PUD. Fire hydrants (installed per City Standards)will be provided at strategic locations throughout the planned community. The precise number and locations will be determined by the City Engineering Department. g. Historic or Archeological Resources At the applicant's request, a record search was conducted by the Montana Historic Preservation Office to determine if any sites of historical of archeological importance were located within the project area. According to the Society's records there have been no previously recorded historic or archaeological site in the project area. However, the Society was concerned that no detailed inventory had been conducted in the area and recommended a cultural resource inventory be conducted to insure no cultural resources are impacted. h. Schools Background • The West Winds Community is located within Bozeman School District No. 7. Existing schools in close proximity to the project include Emily Dickinson Elementary School (K-5''), Chief Joseph Middle School (6 —8d) and Bozeman Senior High School (9ffi— 12`h). The Bozeman School District was contacted requesting comment on the proposed West Winds project (letter&project overview). Mr. Gary Griffith, Supervisor Maintenance and Operations responded in writing on December 4, 2003 (see Appendix A). Mr. Griffith provided the following information for estimated student populations. Table 6.6—District Estimated Additional Students fG ade1Lel WN mber ofS udenas K-5 198 6-8 99 9-12 132 Table 6.7—District Estimated Available Sp aces �G'r_adI,eel Nmber offs uderit K-5 66 6-8 150 9-12 49 • Mr. Griffith's response was for a 1,011-unit development and no consideration was given for the senior portion of the project. The current West Winds project is for a 960 units of which Page 6-18 ENO IN E E It NO AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII West Winds—PreliminaryAned Unit Development • March 5 2004 P , approximately 400 units are within the senior areas. The senior portion of the project will not generate students or impact the local school system. Based on the current unit count of non- senior areas, we anticipate the following number of students entering the local public schools at full build-out of the project. Table 6.8-Anticipated Students (Ad'usted) Grade el Nu ber o Situ is K-5 102 6-8 51 9-12 68 Phasing The increase in student enrollments would occur over the time period that would be required to reach full build-out. Using the data cited above and a projected 12-year build-out of the project, the maximum annual average increase in new enrollments would be 18.4 students per year. Facilities necessary to accommodate this enrollment increase would be part of the facilities plan for the School District. Additional school capacity will be needed to accommodate enrollments resulting from all other development in the Bozeman area. i. Telephone Service Background Qwest provides telephone service to the Bozeman area. Preliminary Planning Area Telephone Service Information Assuming 2 service connections for each of the 960 residential units there would be 1920 new connections within the project Area. A 12-year build-out would generate 160 new connections per year. Projected Impacts and Mitigation Measures,Includin Pg hasing Qwest has sufficient capacity to serve the project area.. j. Electrical Service Back ound The Northwest Energy provides electrical service to the Bozeman area. Preliminary Planning Area Electrical Service Information • Assumingone service connection to each of the estimated 810 single and multi-family units, and g Y a single large service to the skilled nursing facility,there would be approximately 811 new Page 6-19 ENGINEERiN� r West Winds—Preliminary Mned Unit Development March 5, 2004 connections within the project area. A 12-year build-out would generate 68 new electrical service connections per year. Phasing The provision of electrical service would occur as a function of the phasing and build-out. Projected Impacts and Mitigation Measures,IncludingPhasing hasing Northwest energy has sufficient capacity to serve the Planning Area as described in this Master PUD. • Page 6-20 E N6INEEEING ti �� i �� � �. K D SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS PART I LETTERS SENT November 21, 2003 • Project No. 04S067.110 E HNGINEERING McChesney Professional Building • 601 Nikles Drive Robert J. Bukvich, Engineer Suite 2Bozeman, MT 59715 Montana Department of Transportation Phone: 406.586.8834 P.O.Box 1110 Fax: 406.586.1730 Bozeman,MT 59715-1110 WWW.hkminc.com Re: West Winds Planned community Development Application Bozeman,Montana Dear Mr. Bukvich: The purpose of this letter is to formally request a letter from your department evaluating the impacts on state roads resulting from implementation of the proposed West Winds Planned Community described in the enclosed materials. West Winds will be a phase development occurring over the following 5 to 10 years dependant on market forces. The property is owned by Quest West LLC and is described as follows: Northwest Quarter(NW V4), Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana (See attached map for physical location). At a minimum, your response to the following items would be greatly appreciated: • 1. Confirm the existing level of service; 2. Confirm the availability of capacity (existing and planned) to serve.the proposed plan; 3. Identify all improvements, including mitigation measures, that will be needed to serve the proposed master plan, including the phasing of such improvements in conjunction with the proposed phasing of the master plan. I have enclosed a brief description of the master plan, a copy of the land use diagram, and a table summarizing the projected development. Per City of Bozeman requirements, we are preparing a Traffic Study for the project and will supply your office a copy upon completion. I would appreciate receiving your comments by December 19, 2003. Thank you for your timely attention to this request and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, HKM Engineering, Inc. • Clint Litle, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures BILLINGS.MONTANA BUTTE.MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY MONTANA SHERIDAN.WYOMING RAPID CITY.SOUTH DAKOTA 406.656.6399 406.723,8213 406.494.1502 406.232.6666 307.672.9006 605.394.6490 November 21, 2003 ENGINEERING McChesney Professional Building Project No. 04S067.110 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Postmaster Phone: 406.586.8834 Bozeman Post Office Fax: 406.586.1730 - www.hkminc.com Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: West Winds Planned Community Development Application Bozeman,MT Dear Postmaster: I write to formally request a letter from your office setting forth any issues related to the .,.provision of postal service for the Proposed West Winds Development described in the enclosed materials.. West Winds will be a phased development occurring over the following 5 to 10 years dependant on market forces. The property is owned by Quest West LLC and is described as follows: Northwest Quarter(NW '/4), Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana. (See attached map for physical location) As a minimum, your response to the following items would be greatly appreciated: • 1. Confirm the existing level of service; 2. Confirm the availability of capacity(existing and planned) to serve the proposed plan; 3. Identify all improvements, including mitigation measures, that will be needed to serve the proposed master plan, including the phasing of such improvements in conjunction with the proposed phasing of the master plan. I have enclosed a brief description of the master plan, a copy of the land use diagram, and a table summarizing the projected development. I would appreciate receiving your comments by December 19, 2003. Thank you for your timely attention to this request and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, PIKM Engineering Inc. • Clint Litle, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures BIWNGS,MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN,WYOMING RAPID CITY,SOUTH DAKOTA 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 .406.232.6666 307.672.9006 605.394.6490 November 21, 2003 ENGINEERING McChesney Professional Buldng Project No. 045067.110 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Scott Riis Phone: 406.586.8834 Bresnan Communications Fax: 406.586.1730www.hkminc.com 511 West Mendenhall Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: West Winds Planned Community Development Application Bozeman,Montana Dear Mr. Riis: I write to formally request a letter from Bresnan Communications setting forth any issues related to the provision of cable television for the Proposed West Winds Development described in the enclosed materials. West Winds will be a phased development occurring over the following 5 to 10 years dependant on market forces. The property is owned by Quest West LLC and is described as follows: Northwest Quarter(NW 114), Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana(See attached map for physical location). • At a minimum, your response to the following items would be greatly appreciated: 1. Confirm the existing level of service; 2. Confirm the availability of capacity (existing and planned) to serve the proposed plan; 3. Identify all improvements, including mitigation measures, that will be needed to serve the proposed master plan, including the phasing of such improvements in conjunction with the proposed phasing of the master plan. I have enclosed a brief description of the master plan, a copy of the land use diagram, and a table summarizing the projected development. I would appreciate receiving your comments by December 19, 2003. Thank you for your timely attention to this request and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, HKM E ineering Inc. • Clint Litle,P.E. Project Manager Enclosures BILLINGS.MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN.WYOMING RAPID CITY SOUTH DAKOTA 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 406.232.6666 307.672.9006 605.394.6490 H E N G I N q11 yl � McChesney Professional Building • 601 Nikles Drive April 30, 1998 Suite 2Bozeman, MT 59715 Project No. 045067.110 Phone: 406.586.8834 Fax: 406.586.1730 www.hkminc.com Phil Melton Montana Historical Society Historic Preservation Office 1410 8 h Avenue P.O.Box 201202 Helena, MT 59620-1202 Re: West Winds Planned Community Development Application Bozeman,Montana Dear Mr. Melton: The purpose of this letter is to request a cultural resource file search regarding any records indicating historic or archeological sites on the Northwest Quarter(NW 1/4), Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana. (See attached • map for physical location) HKM Engineering is currently preparing an environmental assessment for the proposed project described within the attached materials and would appreciate a letter from your agency confirming the findings of your search. For your information, we have enclosed a brief description of the master plan and a copy of the land use diagram. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. I would appreciate receiving your comments by December 19, 2003. Thank you for your timely attention to this request. Sincerely, HKM Engineering, Inc. Clint Litle, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures BILLINGS.MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN,WYOMING RAPID CITY,SOUTH DAKOTA 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 406.232.6666 307.672.9006 605.394.6490 H November 21, 2003 ENGINEERING M� McChesney Professional Building • Project No. 04S067.110 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Josh Homer Phone: 406.586.8834 Qwest Fax:. 406.586.1730 www.hkminc.com 2707 West Main Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: West Winds Planned Community Development Application Bozeman, Montana Dear Mr. Homer: I write to formally request a letter from Qwest setting forth any issues related to the provision of telephone service for the Proposed West Winds Development described in the enclosed materials. West Winds will be a phased development occurring over the following 5 to 10 years dependant on market forces. The property is owned by Quest West LLC and is described as follows: Northwest Quarter(NW'/4), Section 2, Township 2 South,Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana (See attached map for physical location). • At a minimum, your response to the following items would be greatly appreciated: 1. Confirm the existing level of service; 2. Confirm the availability of capacity (existing and planned)to serve the proposed plan; 3. Identify all improvements, including mitigation measures, that will be needed to serve the proposed master plan, including the phasing of such improvements in conjunction with the proposed phasing of the master plan. I have enclosed a brief description of the master plan, a copy of the land use diagram, and a table summarizing the projected development. I would appreciate receiving your comments by December 19, 2003. Thank you for your timely attention to this request and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, HKM Engineering Inc. • Cli itle, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures BILLINGS,MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN,WYOMING RAPID CITY,SOUTH DAKOTA 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 406.232.6666 307.672.9006 605.394.6490 November 21, 2003 I. ENGINEERING McMesney Professional Buddng • Project No. 045067.110 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Michael K. Redburn,Ed.D. Phone: 406.586.8834 Fax: 406.586.1730 Superintendent www.hkminc.com. Bozeman Public Schools PO Box 520 Bozeman, MT 59771 Re: West Winds Planned Community Development Application Bozeman,Montana Dear Mr. Redburn: I=write to formally request a letter from your office evaluating the impacts on the School.District related to the Proposed West Winds Development described in the enclosed materials. West Winds will be a phased development occurring over the following 5 to 10 years dependant on market forces. The property is owned by Quest West LLC and is described as follows: Northwest Quarter(NW V4), Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana (See attached map for physical location). • At a minimum, your response to the following items would be greatly appreciated: 1. Confirm the existing level of service; 2. Confirm the availability of capacity (existing and planned)to serve the proposed plan; 3. Identify all improvements, including mitigation measures, that will be needed to serve the proposed master plan, including the phasing of such improvements in conjunction with the proposed phasing of the master plan. I have enclosed a brief description of the master plan, a copy of the land use diagram, and a table summarizing the projected development. I would appreciate receiving your comments by December 19, 2001 Thank you for your.timely attention to this request and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, HKM gineering Inc. C 'nt Litle, P.E. • Project Manager Enclosures BIWNGS,MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN,WYOMING RAPID CITY,SOUTH DAKOTA 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 406.232.6666 307.672.9006 605.394.6490 - H November 21, 2003 ENGINEERINGA� McChesney PrIessional Building Project No. 04S067.110 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Matt Micklewright Phone: 406.586.8834 Northwest Energy Fax: 406.586.1730 www.hkminc.com Post Office Box 490 Bozeman, MT 59771 Re: West Winds Planned Community Development Application Dear Mr. Micklewright: I write to formally request a letter from Northwest Energy setting forth any issues related to the provision of power and natural gas for the Proposed West Winds Development described in the enclosed materials. West Winds will be a phased development occurring over the following 5 to 10 years dependant on market forces. The property is owned by Quest West LLC and is described as follows: Northwest Quarter(NW'/4), Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana (See attached map for physical location). At a minimum, your response to the following items would be greatly appreciated: • 1. Confirm the existing level of service; 2. Confirm the availability of capacity(existing and planned) to serve the proposed plan; 3. Identify all improvements, including mitigation measures, that will be needed to serve the proposed master plan, including the phasing of such improvements in conjunction with the proposed phasing of the master plan. I have enclosed a brief description of the master plan, a copy of the land use diagram, and a table summarizing the projected development. I would appreciate receiving your comments by December 19, 2003. Thank you for your timely attention to this request and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, HKM Engineering Inc. • Clint Litle, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures BIWNGS,MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN,WYOMING RAPID CITY,SOUTH DAKOTA 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 406.232.6666 307.672.9006 605.394.6490 • January 2, 2004 Pat Flowers Regional Supervisor MT Fish,Wildlife and Parks 1400 S. 19`h Ave. Bozeman,MT 59718 RE: West Winds Planned Community Development FWP Recommendations Dear Pat, Enclosed is a description of the West Winds Planned Community Development. According to the Plan and Plat Information Requirements for the City of Bozeman(Chapter 16.08.050.F.6),we are required to consult with FWP staff regarding impacts to fish and wildlife and recommendations for mitigation: The subdivider shall discuss the impact of the proposed development on fish and wildlife with the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks • (FWP). With the preliminary plat, the subdivider shall provide written documentation from the FWP that 1) verifies that FWP has reviewed the proposed plat, 2) lists and FWP recommendations, and 3) outlines and mitigation planned to overcome any adverse affects. Would you please review the enclosed document that summarizes the preliminary plat(work in progress)and provide us with the above verification and recommendations? Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Please call me if I can be any assistance to you;I would be happy to provide you with more information or visit the site with you if necessary. I may be reached at 586-1411 or 580-6993. Sincerely, Lynn Bacon Wetland Scientist/Biologist Enclosed: Plat Summary West Winds Planned Comity • November 21, 2003 West Winds Planned Community November 21, 2003 1. Introduction The West Winds Planned Community is a planned residential community providing a variety of housing options to the Bozeman Community. The project is located on the Northwest '/a of Section 2,Township 2 South,Range 5 East, and is physically identified as the 160-acre parcel bounded by Oak Street (south), Baxter Lane (north), 27`h Street projected (east) and Davis Lane projected(west). At full build-out, the project is anticipated to contain approximately 1000 residential units comprised of apartment, multi-family, single family and senior living facilities. The project will be a multi-phased development anticipated to be constructed over a 5 to 10 year period dependant on the housing market. 2. Site Characteristics The pre-development site condition of the proposed 160-acre West Winds Community is agricultural with no structures on site. The property is currently being used for hay production, The site is not currently being irrigated, but the property has water rights through the Farmers • Canal Ditch Company. Land characteristics of the West Winds site can be generalized as flat with a consistent slope of approximately 2% from south to north. The parcel has two irrigation ditches; the Baxter-Border Ditch which lies along the west property line, and an unnamed lateral that bisects the parcel from south to north. vl r • Parcel Looking North From Oak Street At 27th Avenue Page 1 of 6 �.•-_-..o JI esl� A , I uep S I L DLINRE PETERSON SEC 35 G I> �E I ° I yQ EDWARD SifUMH k PEMNSON I LDT 8 L`LATTE3 1 � .v ACAS34 — —L�3639 ACS_ I _ _ 6�y�G< I I ��- q� I • �3 ti -� _ .11— _ _ 1 1 SGn'UT 35 BAXTER LANE !M/N_OR_ARTER/AL) -- oil _ _ II �1 ���� 1I 1 I I 1 I 3 Yd 1 / ,/i:%•. 1 --- j l i T1--- T---T---T-T-— --I—T-- -,----r—r- ;I---`,-�� �k'_ ,j''% --- II ----;I----r FUer I I I I BAXTER j ' j- I- MEADOWS I f—T�-- -f�--��- UBRKWON r-- -------nalr,F - ------- Q 1 r—T---T—i- T--7 �--1 I f—r-T-r �---��.,,_. i .y•�,�„ I if �M1, 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' I l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , �-- ,,:•- ..•��;��\'�.\rm -`�I, 1 � I' IQo- �l!it� , 1 I 1 -- L_LL__L1J___LJ_-1 ' L_1_L_l� ' j 0. �I I I I ( \,,, �,:;r'' �'•:."'�f�'�" ;�,jib --�-- -1 1 1, j , j � ,� ,�, ,.�\ ,�,C.' j; III , t ► r � , �' ' j IW 41 I1 t �T I �I I � ' I I ✓ 'i'`'-'??��.jF= ,'i I� �--�---�--I I---T-- ' ' �'--- -:� III w tl Y OF 1 1 1 Ilk- ---------- � _ �✓ _ —�-- OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL ARTER_/ALI��—"—----- — %1�i IF:u P At r7En i ( HARrEST CREEK l.4,h: S HARD'e'ST CREEK I I III Q TTi.4irNE I I Sfic'D/V/S/ON PHASE 2 I y 1 ` S/PPLE T.?UST I f sr1D 37�- I I I I II - 1 6��8 I I I II CENTE LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY —'--'"— PROPosty ROAD f0°R of WAY NW 114 SECTION 2 T.2.S., R.5E., P.M.M. ——— PROKM tRNI snetEE -""---' PROPOEID EASOM GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA ------- PKPOsm LOT uNt PROPOSED ROAD CENTI R M _N_ En Ineedrl Inc. ® PROPosm CM SPAM g s ® PRwosED CONCEPT PLAN ' McChesney Professional Bldg. O Existwo rEnaRos 601 N5des Dr.,Suite 2 REVISE.• 11121103 Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)58"834 20 0 200 FIGURE 1 FAX(406)586-1730 6 ad* fwt DAIS muVW M 11.=3 PRAECf Na 015007.t10 Copy*t 0 40W KIW&4kw"=N NOW Rwn"d West Winds Planned Coty • November 21, 2003 • 3. Community Facilities The West Winds Community is located within the City limits of Bozeman and is readily serviced by existing Community Facilities. Water and sanitary sewer service is proposed to be provided by the City of Bozeman. Primary access to the community will be provided by Oak Street, Baxter Lane and North 27`h Avenue that pursuant to the Greater Bozeman Area . Transportation Plan are classified as principal arterial, minor arterial and collector streets. Utility suppliers currently serving the Bozeman area will provide power, telephone and natural gas. Based on initial contact with the utility venders capacity to serve the site is readily available do to the close proximity of the community to core facilities. Either BFI or the City will provide waste collection. Emergency response services are proposed to be provided by the City Fire and Police Departments. Ambulance service will be provided by AMR. 4. Adjacent Land Use The West Winds Community is surrounded by a variety of land use that can be generalized as residential mixed use(See Figure 2—Adjoining Land Use Map). To the south of the community the land use is multi-family (Castlebar Apartments) and single-family (Harvest Creek Subdivision). To the west is the 100-acre Regional Park and Baxter Meadows To the north lies • larger tract (1 acre and larger) rural properties with the exception of Baxter Square Subdivision that recently received preliminary plat approval. Baxter Square Subdivision is a 104-lot townhouse project with 3000 SF lots. Lastly, to the east lay two vacant larger parcels (10 and 20 acres) Rose Park, the High Gate Project (45-50 unit senior project) and Home Depot fronting onto North 191h Avenue. The mixed use and density proposed by the West Winds Community is consistent with the existing adjacent land use. 5. Land Use Areas The West Winds Community is a mixed use planned development providing a wide range of housing options, senior assisted living, neighborhood commercial and open space (See Figure 3 —Land Use Diagram). Tables 1 and 2 below breaks down the unit count and land use areas for the project. Table 1 — General Land Use Table Gross Area 148.95 Acres Areas of Roads 32.29 Acres Net Area 116.66 Acres Area of Parks 26.27 Acres Area of Open Space 8.18 Acres • Area of Residential/Commercial 82.21 Acres Page 3 of 6 F�w\ West Winds Planned Coity November 21, 2003 • Table 2—Residential/Commercial Land Use Table A .,µ SE'yy m lli, rr� O Single Family 206 Duplex/Four Plex Multi-Family 104 Townhouse 89 Apartment 174 Senior Area Land Use Duplex%Four Plex Multi-Family 202 Assisted Living/Apartment 200 Neighborhood Commercial 36 Total 1011 • Page 4 of 6 -� F�v.A- V 4 0- S '.0 %_213.1 .7� rL ME; "a - -C-�Fi' a' wakrq- :,7' ,Z'J. ov, g_,"wo L 1 'A dMalon + T 4 `H14.......... 10 4, --it" �5' 10 3 IT.14 .7� gona 1%,Z1 ii�dmswio _1Y A�I W I Ir LU % FGA IM, wq, u� r n � •�.- I:t 3J [ 1. ",5f x T Xp W via- -4.?. q. A-� a .4- 46;n A d I. ,wm.lile,�A ILI ■WEST WINDS COMMUNITY NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E, P.M.M. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA t" Ar Ira "M ADJOINING LAND 601 Wdes Dr.,Suit B 2 USE PLAN Bozeman,MT 59715 I. 586-3834 FAX I. 586-1730 DATE.- SEPT.22.2003 PRWECT NO.,043C,67.110 Adak 114111 "J'5v.0 I -41 7 C 5: VT R LANE (MINOR ARTERIAL)9____. Iq T--r--T—Tit —7 V.n• -�i.- ±�F 1 --i--L J, IL +-JF-J - J- J I'— - - 7- -1 q1 __ ) �• �� k-14444- 4-1 14 rt % -M I 7- M 1(J4 —14 4- 'T'L If A oj! v. d; Z; -—-—-— TT 4 OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL A 2— . .......... L F— .......... LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY PROPOSED OPEN SPACE NW 114 SECTION 2, T-2-S., R-5-E., P.M.M.PROPOSED PARKS IL EXIMO%EnOWS GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA GINteRING WGISCRHOOO OWLERM4L -N- TOMMSE A EngfneerIng Inc. SWGUE FATLY cChesney Professional Bldg. DUPM-FOURIA a WUM-FAULY LAND USE PLAN 601 Nildes Dr.,Suite 2 F0=NM=0-W1 APAR14XT REVISE: 11121103 Bozeman, 59715 SEMOR ASSISTED AND UMWAYLY jJg (406)586WN MT 200 0 200 FIGURE 3 FAX(406)586-1730 wds f"t DALE:MUM 11,2003 PRO=N(L 049057.110 Capy*t 9 200]Hxu E.9howing Lm,An R*ts Rww-" PART II LETTERS RECEIVED 3- 4-04; 4:42FM;hAFC. aozeman,MT • 406 535' 96.34 t 1/ t Oman Division r 121'f�SE�,rifn Drive st aoaernan.MT 59715 Tetzphone:446 582=637 Energyj www.northwesternenergy.com March, 4 2004 Clint Litle H1,3fEngineering 601 Nikles Drive, Suite 2 Bozeman, Montana 59715 Dear Clint: Regarding your recent letter, Northwestern Energy will provide electric and natural gas service to the proposed West Winds Development. Yhese services can be provided in accordance with applicable Montana Public Services rules and regulations and the current Northwestern Energy Company tariff f�'schedule. The subdivision will be served by existing facilities near the development. Northwestern Energy will want to determine the locations of all transformers and underground.lines and-equipment to provide for maintenance and installation We.also would require.all appropriate utility-easements along lot lines.and roads in accordance tivitli common subdivision desib i practices. Installation ofgas and electric service to this proposed development-ivill not significantly impact service to existing facilities in this area. Please call me if you have any que'stions or concerns at 582-4671, also, we would appreciate having a copy of the approved plat of this proposed area prior to providing a ..cost.to bring in.these..services. Sincerely, Matt Micklewright Division Engineer Bozeman Division MONTANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 225 North Roberts o. P.O. Box 201201 o Helena, MT 59620-1201 a (406) 444-2694 c. FAX(406) 444-2696 c. www.montanahistoricalsociery.org November 26, 2003 Clint Litle HKM Engineering 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman MT 59715 RE: WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. SHPO Project#: 2003112504 Dear Mr. Litle: I have conducted a cultural resource file search for the above-cited project located in Section 2, T2S, R5E. According to our records there have been no previously recorded historic or archaeological sites within the designated search locale. The absence of cultural properties in the area does not mean that they do not exist but rather may reflect the absence of any previous cultural resource inventory in the area, as our records indicated none. • Based on the lack of previous inventory and the ground disturbance required b this p rY �' q Y undertaking we feel that this project has the potential to impact cultural properties. We, therefore, recommend that a cultural resource inventory be conducted in order to determine whether or not sites exist and if they will be impacted. Thank you for consulting with us. If you have any further questions or comments you may contact me at (406) 444-7767 or by e-mail at dmurdo@state.mt.us. Sincerely, Damon Murdo Cultural Records Manager • File: LOCAL/SUBDIVISIONS/2003 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE � 1410 P Ave D. P.O.Box 201202�Helena,MT 59620-1202 o (406)444-7715 o FAX(406)444-6575 D 0 �r W�- � - *GO �M� emo � 'w- ENGINE' ERI: NG To: John Dunlap From: Clint Litle CC: File Date: 1/13/2004 Re: Farmers Canal—Bob Davis John: I received a telephone call from Bob Davis this morning regarding my January 5, 2004 letter. Bob stated that the only Farmers Canal irrigation ditch that he is concerned with is the Section line ditch within the future right-of-way of Davis Lane. Bob stated that the ditch company has a tentative agreement with the City to put the Section line ditch in a 4' culvert in the Davis Lane R/W. He also stated that the City and the ditch company would have joint maintenance • liability for the installation. He was not concerned with the Harmon Ditch that enters the property from Harvest Creek Subdivision. Bob stated that the ditch company has no need for the ditch laterals once they enter your property and we can abandon the two easterly ditches. Any questions call. Thanks Clint / Clint Litle,P.E. HKM Engineering 601 Nikles Drive,Suite 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 406.586.8834 406.586.1730(fax) clitle@hkminc.com www.hkminc.com • UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Dec. 16, 2003 . Re: West Winds Development HKM Engineering Clint Little, Project Manager 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman Mt 59715 I have reviewed your letter concerning the proposed West Winds Development. The Postal Service will provide delivery to a centralized point within the development.A good location should be established during the early planning stages to provide sufficient space and easy access to the boxes. Please coordinate this effort with a Postal Service delivery supervisor well in advance of beginning construction. Sincerely; im Squyres Postmaster Bozeman Mt FAx: Montana Department of Transportation David A.Galt,Director Judy Martz,Govemor • Bozeman Area Once 907 N Rouse Avenue PO Box 1110 Bozeman,MT59771-1110 Bozeman,MT 59771-1110 December 8, 2003 Clint Litle,P.E. B KM Engineering 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: West Winds Planned Community Development Please be advised that data required to evaluate the above referenced development will :not be available until completion of the Traffic Study. NOT will review that document and may have specific comments at that time. • Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Robert J. Bukvich Montana Department of Transportation cc. Area file Phone: (406)586-9562 An Equal Opportunity Employer TTy (800)335-7592 Fax (406)586-5202 Web Page.- www.mdt.state.mt.us e Maintenance and Operations Gary J. Griffith Supervisor Phone: (406) 522-6009 404 West Main, P.O. Box 520 Fax: (406) 522-6065 Bozeman, Montana 59771-0520 December 4, 2003 B KM Engineering 601 Nikles Drive, Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Subject:. West Winds Community Dear Clint: Please reference your letter of November 21, 2003 concerning the West Winds Community. We would expect that 1011 housing units would generate the following students: ♦ K-5 198 Students ♦ 6-8 99 Students ♦ 9-12 132 Students As of the district's official count dated October 2003 we have the following number of spaces available in our classrooms: ♦ K-5 66 ♦ 6-8 150 ♦ 9-12 49 During the last 24 months we have responded to similar requests for information totaling the following potential numbers of students: ♦ K-5 537 Students ♦ 6-8 269 Students ♦ 9-12 358 Students Our existing bus system can accommodate your additional students. Sin y, G S isor Maintenance and Operations ozeman School District#7 1 RESPONSEAMERICAN MEDICAL Jason Kingsley Operation Manager American Medical Response 2101 Industrial Bozeman, MT 59715 HKM Engineering McChesney Professional Bldg 601 Nikles Dr, Ste 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Dear Mr. Litle, I have reviewed the site map for the.West Winds Planned Community. Currently, American Medical Response provides Advanced Life Support ambulances with a paramedic for the area in question. Approximate response time, barring unexpected circumstances, will typically be between 6 and 10 minutes with a first response by the' appropriate Fire Department. There is no reason to believe this coverage will change in • the foreseeable future. I can see nothing which would adversely affect Emergency Medical Services. As with all new development, I wish to make certain that the buildings are clearly marked so there is no delay in finding an address. Best regards, Jason Kingsley Operation Manager 12-05-03 • Bozeman Deaconess HOSPITAL December 22003 Clinuitie, P.E. Project Manager=' _ HKM Engineering 601 N.ikYes,Drive;-Suite 2 Bozeman, MT �597'15 RE: ..Proposed WFist Winds Plan- Community,Development,'Bozeman, Montana r Dear Mr. Litle: I am not aware/of any negative impact that proposed West Winds Planned ;Community Development would have on our ability to-deliver our services to,,the residents-of Gallatin County. If I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. J Sincerely, John A. Nordwick - President & CEO JAN/cdi _ Tel: 406 585 5000 I•Fax: 406 585.1070 915 Highland Boulevard] Bozeman, MT 59715 www.bozemandeaconess.org BRE5MM • Communications Bresnan Communications 511 West Mendenhall Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Tel:800.823.6766 Fax:406.586.6381 www.bresnan.com 11-26-03 BKM Engineering 601 Nikels Dr. Suite 2 Bozeman MT. 59715 RE: West Winds Community • Bresnan Communications is planning on serving this development.We plan on going in with Northwestern Energy when they serve the subdivision. Scott Riis f Technical erations Supervisor • your link to TOMORROW �dc N O or CL v GEOTECEMCAL INVESTIGATION WEST WINDS SUBDIVISION BOZEMAN, MONTANA Prepared for Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Drive, Suite 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 • Prepared by HKM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Drive, Suite 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 Principal Author:Nathan Peterson, Geologist... , >, Reviewed by: Greg Underhill,P.E. � eeees * GRE • n, . 15 pE t� February2004 �'o,�• s7E��°•'��`,' Project Number 045067.110 ° ' FL �,��� • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION........................ .............I 2. FIELD INVESTIGATION.................................................................................:3 3. LABORATORYANALYSIS...............................................................................9 4. SUBSURFACE CONDTTIONS..................................................................................10 4.1 Local Geologic Setting..............................................................................10 4.2 Soil Profile and Characteristics.......................................................................................10 4.3 Groundwater...................................................................................................................11 5. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................12 5.1 Pavement Section Design ...............................................................................................12 5.1.1 Construction Considerations....................................................................................14 5.2 Pipeline Construction ...............................................................................15 • 5.2.1 General........................................................... ..15 5.2.2 Excavation..........................................................................................15 5.2.3 Trench Dewatering................................................................................15 5.2.4 Trench Wall Stability................................................................................................15 5.2.5 Pipe Bedding and Pipe Zone Backfill......................................................................16 5.2.6 Trench Backfill .........................................................................................................17 5.2.7 Pipe Thrust Restraint................................................................................................18 5.3 Corrosion Protection Considerations..............................................................................19 5.3.1 Protection of Buried Metal.......................................................................................19 5.3.2 Protection of Concrete.............................................................................................20 5.4 Foundation Considerations.............................................................................................21 5.4.1 Proposed Structure Design .......21 5.4.2 Foundation Soil, Groundwater Conditions, General Footing Recommendations....21 5.4.3 Structural Design Parameters...................................................................................23 5.4.4 Structural Fill Placement............................................................:.............................23 5.4.5 Dewatering...............................................................................................................24 5.4.6 Placement of Areal Fills...........................................................................................24 5.4.7 Concrete Floor Slabs................................................................................................25 5.4.8 Seismicity.................................................................................................................26 • 5.5 Site Earthwork................................................................................................................26 5.5.1 General.....................................................................................................................26 i HAWS067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc ENGINEE4ING � • 5.5.2 Fill Placement..............................................................:............................................26 5.5.3 Excavation................................................................................................................27 5.5.4 Surface Drainage......................................................................................................27 6. LIMITATIONS.........................................................................................................................28 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Site Vicinity Map.................................................................................................2 Figure 2: Geotechnical Exploration Hole Locations................................................:.......................5 Figure 3: Generalized Soil Profile...................................................................................................6 Figure 4: Generalized Soil Profile...................................................................................................7 Figure 5: Generalized Soil Profile...................................................................................................8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Groundwater Measurements............................................................................................I I Table 2: Recommended Surfacing Section...................................................................................13 Table 3: Soil Resistivity Measurements.........................................................................................19 • Table 4: Soluble Sulfate Measurements ........................................................................................20 . Table 5: Elevations of Sand and Gravel Bearing Layer................................................................22 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Logs of Exploration Borings and Test Pits Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ii HA04\S067110\Geotech\WWindGTReport.doc ENGINEERING AIIIIIIIIIIIIII • 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION The West Winds Planned Community is a 960-unit mixed use residential development located in the Northwest 1/4, Section 2, Township 2.South, Range 5 East, bordered by Oak Street on the south,North 27th Avenue on the east,Baxter Lane on the north, and Davis Lane on the west. A geotechnical investigation was conducted at the proposed West Winds Subdivision, Bozeman, Montana to determine the subsurface soil and groundwater characteristics. The investigation consisted of field drilling and backhoe test pits, laboratory testing and engineering analysis. Recommendations are provided for road surfacing section design, pipeline construction, and residential unit construction. • HAMS0671 10\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc ENGINEERING \9 1 r I LA rJ � 1 • W S T WINDS 2 C MMUNI T Y BAXTER LN r� o � W Q 2 -- W OAK ST s sT z �maae/ i iawt DURSTON RD S: - - RIM, y r� JIM! • �l i �..®=® E � W MAIN ST MEE - I�✓ BABCOCK ST. s F ®0®®® LAI R., --��- rq u i LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y Roads NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.S.E., P.M.M. < ENGINEERING limits GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA -- City -�;- ,1KM Engineering Inc. y McChesney Professional Bldg. Pam SITE V/C/N/T Y MAP 601 Nildes Dr.,Suite 2 _Trails Bozeman,MT 59715 )406)58"834 Bike Path FIGURE 1 FAX)406)586.1730 low �� Schools ket DATE FEB,1B.2004 PROJECT NO.04SD87.110 0 Ceptrlot O 2004 WM Englnemhg Ina,AN Rights Reamved 2 • 2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION The investigation included a geologic review of the area, a field drilling program,backhoe pit excavations, and laboratory analysis. On April 8 and November 21, 2003, HKM personnel conducted site reconnaissance and monitored subsurface explorations at the locations indicated on Figure 2. A total of nine (9) test pits and nine (9) exploratory boreholes were completed at the locations indicated on Figure 2. The test pit and borehole locations and elevations were determined in the field by HKM licensed survey crews. Groundwater Monitor wells were installed in each of the test pit locations and four (4) of the exploration bore holes. The test pits were excavated to depths ranging from 7 to 11.5 feet. The exploration boreholes were extended to depths ranging from 14 to 16 feet. As the excavation or drilling progressed, groundwater levels were measured and soil samples were taken for field classification. All excavations and drill holes were backfilled with drill cuttings. • Test its were excavated b means of a Cat 416B backhoe operated b Williams Plumbing. p Y P Y g HKM Geologists monitored the excavations and examined and classified soils. Pertinent information recorded included depths, stratigraphy, soil engineering characteristics and groundwater occurrence. Disturbed bulk samples were obtained and returned to the laboratory for further analysis. Boreholes were advanced by Hansen Environmental Drilling of Glasgow, Montana using a CME-55 truck-mounted drill rig. HKM Geologists monitored borehole advancement and examined and classified soils. Pertinent information recorded included depths, stratigraphy, soil engineering characteristics and groundwater occurrence. Standard penetration tests (SPT's, ASTM D 1586) were conducted in each borehole to obtain soil samples and to provide an indication of the relative density or consistency of the soils. Several undisturbed samples were obtained with thin walled shelby tubes. Disturbed bulk soil samples were collected from the drill cuttings as drilling progressed. The undisturbed samples were left in the thin walled tubes and sealed for transportation. The soil samples covered during the exploration drilling were then taken to our laboratory where they were subsequently analyzed. 3 H:\04\S067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc ENGINEERING SPT and bulk samples were placed in plastic bags, sealed to prevent moisture loss and returned to the BKM laboratory for further examination and assignment of laboratory testing. Representative soil samples were classified by the general principles of the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2487 or D 2488): Soil classification descriptions are provided on the "Logs of Exploration Borings and Test Pits" in Appendix A. Stratigraphic contacts shown on the summary logs represent approximate boundaries between soil types. The subsurface conditions are those recorded on the exploration date and may not represent those of other times or locations. Differences in stratification are likely,to occur between boring locations. Continuous logs of the borings and test pits are presented in Appendix A, "Logs of Exploration Borings and Test Pits" • 4 H:\04\S067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc ENGINEERING TEST PITS r r r 3 LANE (MINOR ARTERIAL) 2 _4--------- - T--r-T--f---I 21 1 12"� 7 'i ­4 L _L_1_J_.i__I__j 1,L-J- L-L__L_J -RAZE -LANE-—-—-—-—- ITI. LL IL-_i.j j : ; j H--- I .I L_j__-1 1 Q.4' - �i 'r 77�7 1 T _ �r_ IT III 11 717- T`H 1- TFEEF-—-—- L L !j i GROVE -S_L i Ji L i Mw­6 w. 41 T MW-4 d Y, Z IVI -41 L N Qj _j I . __. .PLC_------- ------------ --------------- =--—-—-—----—-—- ----------------- —--—---------------6 jj MN —---—-------- .--.------.OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL) -------—------- R CENTER OF S. 2 LEGEND WES T WINDS COMMUNITY 8-7- OWE HOLE LOCATION NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. MW-1 0 TEST PIT LocAwH I GALLA TIN COUNTY, A40NTANA -N- i%M Engineering Inc. BORE HOLE AND TEST PIT '.CChesney Professional Bldg. 601 Nildes Dr.,Suite 2 LOCA TION MAP Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)586-8834 2000 200 FIGURE 2 FAX(406)586-1730 04SO57,O. 1110 DATE* FEB.Ia.2004 PROJECT N C4PYight 0 2004 HKM EqI—ig Inc,All Right.R­rve& 5 3 PO - 8 B PO f200 1500 1800 2f00 2400 H-9 MW7 4732.5 4732.5 a •� H 7 i•' 4725 = 4725 t \ �aCe ::-,,4W -s • z � o iz 4717.5 ' 0717.5 2 �X \ -3 Approximate 4710 Ground ater Level on 7/1/03 14710 \ BH-1 \ N \ 4702.5 4702.5 *Water tabl 3 interpolated from actual measurem is on 7/1/03 of we Its labeled MW-X Plan View Strata symbols ® Poorly graded gravel with silt H-13 Topsoil ® Low plasticity 0 Gay HKM ENGINEERING, INC. e0 ® silt T6 Poorly graded gravel GENERALIZED SOIL PROFILE a"r and sand M05 Poorly graded gravel scALe. 1• mao� ' DATE DRAWN •« ® Clayey gravel SCALEV-7.s1 3/2/04 e�7 ® Silty low plasticity West Winds Subdivision Mw-7 clay e I FIGURE NUMBER a09 PROJECT NO. 4S067.110 3 0 1000 2000 3000 4740 4740 14W-9 4732.5 4732.5 \ H-8 4725 4725 \ \\ z �a Vey \\ BH 5 y o a 4717.5 `» 4717.5 H-2 MW-2 \ \ 4710 \ 4710 t \ r •? Approximate 4702.5 - 4706 Level on 7/1/03 "Water table interpolated from actual measu ements on 7/1/03 of wells labeled MW-X Plan View Strata symbols Poorly graded gravel BH-2 MWW-2 Topsoil 0 ® Silty low plasticity Gay HKM ENGINEERING, INC. BH- ® cow plasticity Flay Poorly graded gravel GENERALIZED SOIL PROFILE Mw-e and sand HURZONTAL SCALE r ortio=1 Y DATE DRAWN 0 ® Poorly graded gravel with silt scnLe: r-7.s 3/2/04 BH- ® clayey gravel West Winds Subdivision FIGURE NUMBER MWW-9 PROJECT NO. 4S067.110 4 PRO L i ILE 0 3 0 6110 9110 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 4732.5 4732.E \ BH-6 \ \ J 725 4725 -4 Grou d Surface � y r~ 4717.5 4717.5 Approximate — _ z Groundv ater Level on 7/1/03 \ 4710 \ _j 4710 1 \ .r' Y 4702.5 '� 4702.5 i *Water to le interpolated from actual measureme is on 7/1/03 of wel s labeled MW-X Plin Views Strata symbols Silty sand and gravel mw-1 �` Topsoil Silty gravel HKM ENGINEERING, INC. 9H�-3 ® Low plasticity GENERALIZED SOIL PROFILE clay ;�, Poorly graded gravel AL mw.4 Poorly graded gravel SCALE: r ro onioml DATE DRAWN . SCALE: 1"-7.5' 3/2/04 silltt® 0 with silt West Winds Subdivision BH-8 0 FIGURE NUMBER mew-8 PROJECT NO. 4SO67.110 5 • 3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS Representative field samples were selected for laboratory testing after careful visual examination of the soils and consideration of the design criteria. All index and engineering soils property tests were performed by HKM Engineering Inc. Laboratory tests included: TEst Purpose of Test Natural Moisture Content To determine the natural (in situ) water (ASTM D 2216) content and to correlate the geologic history. Atterberg Limits To provide an indicator of the shear (ASTM D 4318) strength and compressibility of the soil. Particle-Size Distribution To determine the grain sizes of the soils (ASTM D 422) for classification and identification of • physical characteristics. To determine the relationship of water Moisture-Density Curve content to the density of soil during a (ASTM D 698,D 1557) compaction process. To evaluate the relative quality of California Bearing Ratio subgrade, subbase and base soils for (ASTM D 1883) pavements Resistivity/pH To estimate the corrosion potential of soil (ASTM G57) to buried metal All laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with the most recent ASTM or other procedures standard to the industry. A summary of laboratory test results is presented on the Logs of Exploration Holes in Appendix A. Additional data for individual tests are detailed on the summary table and figures in Appendix B. HAOAS0671 10\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 9 ENGINEERING � 0 s • 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4.1 Local Geologic Setting The Gallatin valley is an intermountain basin in the Rocky Mountains bounded by the Bridger and Gallatin Ranges to the East and South. The Gallatin Mountain Range has provided material for vast coalescing alluvial fans deposited upon the valley floor from the South and East valley limits, sloping rather steeply to the North. These alluvial/fluviatile deposits range from Tertiary to Quaternary in age. The project site is located on the Northwest side of Bozeman on Quaternary age alluvial deposits known as the Bozeman Fan. The alluvial fan deposits typically consist of varying thickness of silty clay and silt overlaying sandy gravel with cobbles at depth. The site topography slopes gently to the North with an irrigation ditch bisecting the area and providing drainage to the North. Groundwater levels in this area are driven by cyclical • irrigation and range from 2-3 feet below surface in the late spring and summer to 4-9 feet below the surface in late fall and winter. 4.2 Soil Profile and Characteristics The soil profiles encountered at the site consist of topsoil and lean clay, silt, and silty clay overlaying gravel. Topsoil varies in thickness from 10 to 12 inches. The fine grained clay and silt deposits extend from 3 to 6 feet in thickness and are typically firm in consistency and high in natural moisture. Gravel is encountered at depths ranging from 4 to 7 feet. The gravel ranged in visual classification from clayey gravel with sand and cobbles to poorly graded gravel with sand and cobbles. The gravel is generally dense in consistency and high in natural moisture. • HANSOM I0\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 10 ENGINEERING WATER DEPTH 4.3 Groundwater For each observation well location, groundwater measurements are presented in Table 1 at . the highest elevation recorded for the period of April 9, 2003 through February 4, 2004. TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENTS OBSERVATION DEPTH TO WELL GROUNDWATER (ft) DATE BH-1 5.5 2/4/04 BH-3 10.4 2/4/04 BH-5 6.9 2/4/04 BH-7 7.9 2/4/04 MW-1 5.0 4/24/03 MW-2 3.3 4/9/03 MW-3 1.8 4/9/03 MW-4 1.7 4/24/03 MW-5 2.5 4/24/03 MW-6 2.4 4/24/03 MW-7 7.2 7/l/03 MW-8 5.6 7/1/03 MW-9 6.2 7/l/03 Fluctuations of groundwater occur due to seasonal moisture conditions, irrigation practices, changes in land use and many other factors. Groundwater levels may vary from those shown depending upon the influence of these factors. Monitor wells have been installed in each location displayed in table 1. Seasonal groundwater fluctuations may be recorded utilizing these observation points. HAWS067110\Geotech\WWindGTReport.doc 11 ENGINEERING 5.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS/RECOMI HNDATIONS Geotechnical recommendations pertinent to foundation design and construction of the facility elements are presented in the following sections. 5.1 Pavement Section Design Subgrade soil conditions have been described under Subsurface Conditions. Soft to stiff lean clay is the subgrade soil and governs for design considerations. This material exhibits CBR values ranging from 8.0 (resilient modulus equal to approximately 12,000 psi, R-value approximately 20) to 4.9 (7,350 psi, R-value approximately 12), which are indicative of a poor subgrade material. Based on moisture data obtained from representative samples, the clay subgrade moisture conditions are generally above optimum moisture content. Since the traffic volume determination is estimated, some interpretation and assumptions are • required to determine 18-Kip Equivalent Single Axle Loads required for design based on at least a 20 year performance period traffic volume. Based on our experience and following guidelines provided by Asphalt Institute Design Manual MS-1 and specifications provided by the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations, we have assumed a 20 year design Total Equivalent 18-Kip Single Axle Load of approximately 100,000. This number is twice the minimum standard set by the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations. According to Asphalt Institute, this number also relates to traffic class III (Rural Minor Collector roads: 70,000 to 150,000 heavy trucks over the design period) A pavement design has been completed utilizing the results of the geotechnical investigation conducted at the site, subsequent lab testing, and following AASHTO 1993 pavement design methodology. Design Section: ASSHTO 1993 design methodology has been used assuming the following parameters: H:\04\S067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 12 E NGIN EEEING AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i • • Design =Life 20 years Design R-Value= 12 Initial Serviceability Index=4.2 Serviceability Index=2.0(secondary road) Total Equivalent 18-Kip Single Axle Loads= 100,000 Reliability Level(%)=75 Overall Standard Deviation= .45 Effective Subgrade Resilient Modulus=6,000(reduced value) Design Structural Number=2.5 Structural Component Coefficient(R-Value>70 Per Inch)* Plant Mix Bituminous Surfacing .33 Crushed Base Course(3/4"Minus) .12 • Pit Run(6"Minus) .10 *Structural component coefficient values derived from Montana Department of Transportation, Pavement Design Manual 1991. Based on the assumed traffic, established subgrade conditions,utilization of AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures 1993, and our experience with performance of surfacing sections in the Bozeman vicinity, the following pavement sections are recommended in Table 2: TABLE 2 RECOMMENDED SURFACING SECTION WEST WINDS SUBDIVISION Material Thickness(inches) Hot Plant Mix Surface Course 3 Crushed base(1 inch minus) 3 Pit run sub-base(6 inch minus) 15 H:\04\.5067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 13 ENGINEERING AIIIIIIIIIIIIII s � • In addition to the above pavement section, geotextile stabilization fabric will be required as a separator between the native clays and imported pit run subbase due to weak subgrade strength as well as potentially high water table at the site. The recommended stabilization geotextile fabric is AMOCO 2002 or equivalent and installed as per manufacturer recommendations. 5.1.1 Construction Considerations Prior to fill placement, all topsoil and organic matter should be stripped(approximately 1 foot) to expose the subgrade. The existing subgrade should be scarified to a depth of at least eight inches, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of maximum dry density, at f2 percent of optimum moisture content according to ASTM D 698. Subgrade areas wet of optimum moisture may be encountered. Extreme care must be taken in these areas during construction to avoid excessive rutting prior to placement of geotextile fabric and pit run. If excessive rutting or "pumping" of the soil occurs in • identified wet areas then these areas should be excavated to a minimum depth of one foot and replaced with geotextile stabilization fabric prior to placement of compacted granular fill to grade.,. Drying of the subgrade soils may be required in order to achieve the specified compaction. Prior to placement of subbase the subgrade shall be proof rolled with heavy equipment. Soft or unstable areas should be overexcavated a minimum depth of one foot and stabilized using geotextile fabric and compacted gravel. Base and sub-base materials should be compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density at plus or minus 1.5 percent of optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D 698. HAWS067110\Geotech\WWindGTReport.doc 14 ENGINEERING • 5.2 Pipeline Construction 5.2.1 General Sewer lines may consist of 8 to 15 inch diameter PVC pipe and water lines will consist of 8 inch ductile iron pipe. Burial depth of the sewer and water lines will typically not exceed 9 feet. Engineering considerations associated with construction of the proposed pipelines are excavation, trench dewatering, trench wall stability, pipe bedding and pipe zone backfill, trench backfill,pipe thrust restraint. 5.2.2 Excavation The material to be excavated along the alignment will consist of soft to stiff lean clay, and • moderately dense to dense gravel. These materials may be excavated with conventional equipment utilized for trench excavation. 5.2.3 Trench Dewatering Based on the conditions encountered in the drill holes, dewatering will be necessary for the pipeline excavation. Groundwater may be present at shallow depths of 2 feet or less depending upon the time of year and irrigation practices. 5.2.4 Trench Wall Stability Surface soils along the alignment are generally soft to stiff in consistency and of low shear strength. Gravel soils underlying the clay surface soils are medium dense to dense but saturated. All temporary excavation slopes during construction must be in conformance with OSHA Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR Part 1926.652 Appendix B to Subpart P. HAMS0671 10\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 15 ENGINEERING 0 • Based upon groundwater conditions, soil types encountered, and standard penetration tests at the time of the investigation, the soils within the trench excavations at the boring locations may be classified as Type C soil according to OSHA requirements. Unshored Type C soils require maximum allowable slope angles of 1.5H:1 V(horizontal to vertical). Utilization of trench boxes or shoring will minimize sloping of the trench sidewalls. Trench boxes and shoring methods must be in conformance to OSHA requirements for Type 2 Trenches (Appendix B and OSHA Regulation 1926.652). The stability of the construction excavations and associated worker safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The nature and extent of subsurface variations and groundwater conditions between boring locations may not became evident until construction. Therefore, a knowledgeable • soils engineer should assess soil conditions at the time of construction to ensure compliance to OSHA requirements. 5.2.5 Pipe Bedding and Pipe Zone Backfill Competent pipe bedding and haunching serve to support the pipe and the overlying trench backfill material. They provide protection to the pipe from large rocks or sharp objects during backfilling of the trench. As such, the pipe bedding and haunching should have the following characteristics: • High strength and low compressibility- to minimize pipe deflections from loading by the backfill materials. • Easily placed and compacted- to facilitate placement of the material under the haunches of the pipe where access with compaction equipment is difficult. HANS067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 16 ENGINEEEING � In addition, the bedding and haunching material should have no large stones which could damage the pipe during placement, and should be non-moisture sensitive so that moisture which may be present in the bottom of the trench will not affect the compactability of the bedding. We recommend the bedding and haunching requirements generally follow MPW Section 02221. A minimum of four inches of 3/4-inch minus imported granular bedding material should be placed under the pipe across the entire width of the trench and extend to the springline of the pipe. The bedding and haunching should be workable enough to allow precise setting of the.pipe grade and position. The initial backfill from the spring line to 6 inches over the top of the pipe should consist of select earth free from clods, lumps of frozen material or stones larger than 1-1/2 inches. Pipe joints should be held secure during the initial backfilling to help maintain the desired alignment and integrity of the system. • 5.2.6 Trench Backfill Trench backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density at optimum moisture content according to ASTM D 698 in road shoulders, areas underlying roads,road turnoffs and under all crossings. Trench backfill should be compacted to not less than 92 percent of the maximum dry density according to ASTM D 698 in all other locations to reduce trench surface settlement. It is recommended with the exception of road and turnout areas that the trench backfill surface be mounded slightly to provide positive drainage and help compensate for any settlement that may occur. Soil should be compacted to at least the density of the adjacent undisturbed soil in these areas. Based upon laboratory moisture content determinations, at the time of our investigations, soils in the project area are typically high in natural moisture and are above the optimum • moisture content necessary for proper compaction. However, near surface clay and silt HAMS067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 17 EJEAMM ENGINEERING • materials may be wet or dry of optimum depending upon the time of year construction takes place. A rise in water table could also cause soils within the capillary fringe to become wet of optimum. Material dry of optimum will generally require the addition of water to achieve the proper moisture content for compaction. If wet materials are encountered drying or replacement with suitable backfill material will be required. In areas where compaction is required, cohesive soils (clay) should be compacted at moisture contents within f2 percent of the optimum moisture content utilizing a sheepsfoot type compactor. Cohesionless soils (sand and gravel) soils should be compacted at moisture contents within f1.5 percent of optimum utilizing vibratory rolling equipment. Hand tampers may be utilized for compaction adjacent to the pipe, however, soil lifts should not exceed 4 inches when utilizing hand tamping compaction equipment. 5.2.7 Pipe Thrust Restraint • Pipe thrust can be restrained by bearing against the soil through a thrust block or by friction between the pipe surface and the soil. Thrust restraint may be required for any one of these conditions: • Bends in the vertical plane • Bends in the horizontal plane • Valves • Reducers • Tees In all cases, the design engineer must determine the direction and magnitude of the maximum expected pipe thrust. Horizontal and downward components of the thrust forces must be resisted by the thrust block bearing against the soil. Based on soil types encountered and standard penetration tests taken during the • investigation an allowable soil bearing value of 1000 lbs./sq. I'may be used for design of HANSOM I O\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 18 ENGINEERING AIIIIIIIIIIIIII • thrust blocks placed in the fine grained soils in the area. An allowable soil bearing value of 25001bs./sq. ft. may be utilized in pipelines placed in the alluvial gravels provided the top of the block is located a minimum of 2 feet below the ground surface. Thrust blocks which resist lateral forces should be placed against undisturbed earth or have backfill placed against the thrust block compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM. 5.3 Corrosion Protection Considerations 5.3.1 Protection of Buried Metal Resistivity measurements obtained from soil samples are presented in Table 3. TABLE 3 SOIL RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS • WEST WINDS SUBDIVISION Bore- Depth USCS pH Minimum Resistivi Anticipated Corrosion hole ft Ohm-cm Activity to Metal BH-4 1-5.0' CL 8.0 1770 Severe The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) criteria for anticipated corrosion activity to buried metal are: Under 1,000 ohm-cm Very Severe 1,000-2,000 Severe 2,000-5,000 Moderate 500-10,000 Slight Over 10,000 Non-corrosive Based on test results, the anticipated corrosion activity on buried metal is severe based on USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) criteria. Metal appurtenances and fittings should be stainless steel, epoxy coated or encased in polyethylene wrap. Bolts,nuts,.and washers should be made of stainless steel or bronze or coated with epoxy. HAMS0671 10\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 19 ENGINEERING AIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • . Corrosion protection should also be provided for any metal service connections. If utilities are to be constructed of PVC,pipe corrosion is not a concern. 5.3.2 Protection of Concrete Soluble sulfate percentages recorded for tests performed on soil samples are presented in Table 4. TABLE 4 SOLUBLE SULFATE MEASUREMENTS WEST WINDS SUBDIVISION Depth of Soluble Sulfates Anticipated Required Borehole Sample USCS (SO4—percent) Concrete Attack Cement Type feet BH-4 1-5.0' CL Not Detected Ne li 'ble T e II The American Concrete Institute (ACI 202.2R-92) criteria for concrete attack are (Neville, 1996): under 0.10 % SO4 Negligible 0.10 to 0.20% Moderate 0.20 to 2.0 % Severe over 2.0 % Very Severe Based on the test results, the clays encountered in the project areas should exhibit negligible corrosion potential to concrete. Based on sulfate attack potential, as characterized by concentrations of soluble sulfates, the soils at the site could exhibit negligible deleterious potential to concrete. Type II Portland Cement is recommended for all project concrete. All foundations and wall concrete should be designed in accordance with the provisions of the ACI Design Manual, Section 318, Chapter 4. • HANSOM 10\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 20 RJEAMAR ENGINEERING • 5.4 Foundation Considerations Geotechnical recommendations pertinent to foundation design and construction are presented in the following sections. 5.4.1 Proposed Structure Design Proposed structures at the time of this report, for the West Winds Development,will consist of relatively light structures consisting of single-family residences, two story duplexes and townhouses. The structures will generally be constructed with crawl spaces or slab on grade floors with perimeter wall footings and isolated lightly loaded columns. Anticipated loads for these structures are up to 60 kips for column loads and 2 kips per linear foot for perimeter wall loads. Concentrated floor loads are anticipated not to exceed 1000 pounds per square foot. • 5.4.2 Foundation Soil, Groundwater Conditions and General Footing Recommendations As described in Section 4, site soil conditions consist of soft to firm clay soils overlying medium dense to dense sands, gravels and cobbles. The gravels are encountered at depths ranging from two to seven feet. The overlying surficial clay materials are considered low strength, moisture sensitive, and not suitable for footing support. Footings could be placed on either the native gravel or upon structural fill as presented in section 5.4.4. Clay and silt materials at footing grade should be removed to the underlying dense sand and gravel layer or overexcavated to a minimum depth of two (2) footing widths for columns and three (3) footing widths for continuous footings (see section 5.4.4). Based on the site's fluctuating groundwater elevation, only structures designed with a "crawl space" or "slab on grade" style are recommended. Crawl space depths should not exceed two to three feet below ground level to preclude the potential for groundwater to intrude into the crawl space. Perimeter drains could be installed around the exterior of the crawl space, however, these drains would have to be connected to storm drainage systems to be effective. Groundwater may be encountered at approximate excavation depths ranging from 2 to 4 feet depending on the location within the development. Dewatering most likely will be required to facilitate proper • placement of the footings and is discussed in Section 5.4.5. HAMS0671 10\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 21 ENGINEERING 0 • • Care should be taken to not disturb the saturated in-situ sand and gravel or clay soils at the bottom of excavations. Existing soils will be in a moist or saturated condition and disturbance will cause a reduction in shear strength. Should these soils be disturbed, removal to undisturbed layers will be required. The recommendations presented in this section pertain to lightly loaded structures. Larger structures should bear on structural fill placed on the dense gravel stratum. Table 5 presents approximate elevations and depths of the top contact of the sand and gravel bearing layers encountered in the borings. Generalized soil profiles displaying gravel layer depths and groundwater levels are presented in figures 3, 4, and 5. TABLE 5 • ELEVATIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL BEARING LAYER Boring Surface Approximate Depth to Gravel Number Elevation Elevation of Sand and Layer (Feet) Gravel Layer(Feet) (Feet) BH-1 4707.9 4703.4 4.5 BH-2 4712.9 4707.9 5.0 BH-3 4717.9 4712.4 5.5 BH4 4717.2 4711.7 5.5 BH-5 4719.3 4714.8 4.5 BH-6 4729.7 4724.2 5.5 BH-7 4727.9 4723.4 4.5 BH-8 4728.7 4723.2 5.5 BH-9 4736.3 4731.8 4.5 HAMS067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 22 ENGINEERING � • 5.4.3 Structural Design Parameters-Spread Footings on Structural Fill Allowable Bearing Pressure: Footings bearing directly on structural fill or on natural dense sand and gravel designed utilizing a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf(pounds per square foot). Structural fill placement is discussed in section 5.4.3. Total settlement for this footing pressure is estimated to be approximately 1/2 inch with estimated differential settlements less than 1/4 inch. Footing grade should be 3.5 feet below the final exterior grade elevation based on subsurface the subsurface profile and frost considerations Lateral Pressures: Assuming that lean clay will be the predominate material utilized for backfill. The following values may be utilized for estimating resistance to lateral loads: Active(unsaturated).........................................................................45 pcf* . . At Rest(unsaturated).......................................................................60 pcf* Passive ....................................................................................250 psf/ft* Coefficient of friction between concrete and gravel Tan 5=0.45 *These recommendations are based on the assumption that no hydrostatic pressures exist. Neglects the first foot of backfill depth. 5.4.4 Structural Fill Placement The low strength surface clay soils should be overexcavated to a minimum depth of two (2) footing widths for columns and three (3) footing widths for continuous footings and structural fill placed to footing grade. Alternately, the clay materials can be removed down to the dense to medium dense natural gravel layer and structural fill placed to footing grade. Structural fill should extend one foot horizontally beyond the footing for each foot of depth excavated below the footing. • Because of the high groundwater conditions, washed, crushed gravel is HA04\S067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 23 ENGINEERING • recommended for structural fill. This will allow proper compaction to be achieved with minimal disturbance to the underlying saturated subgrade soils. The washed crushed gravel will also provide a stable free draining subgrade for footings, should the groundwater table continue to fluctuate over time. Approved pit run gravel could also be utilized but dewatering would be more critical to allow proper compaction. Structural fill should be compacted to not less than 98 percent of maximum dry density at plus or minus 2 percentage points of optimum moisture content in accordance to ASTM D 698. For a material that does not exhibit a well defined moisture density curve, 75 percent of relative density according to ASTM D 4253 or D 4254 is required. Quality control is essential during fill placement. Frequent compaction testing and consistent placement procedures with properly sized compaction equipment are required to produce a consistent and unyielding subgrade for successful support of the structural elements. • 5.4.5 Dewatering Groundwater monitoring was conducted between the periods of April 9, 2003 and February 4, 2004. Groundwater at it highest point within these wells was encountered at less than 2 feet to as much as 7 feet below the ground surface. Dewatering may be required to facilitate proper placement of the structural footings depending upon the time of year. The extent of dewatering will depend upon groundwater conditions at the time of construction. The soils should be dewatered from one to two feet below the bottom of the excavation. Various dewatering methods may be utilized. Well points, sumps or dewatering trenches may be required to achieve adequate dewatering to allow proper footing placement. 5.4.6 Placement of Areal Fills As discussed previously a layer of firm to soft clay overlays the site the thickness of this layer varies form 4 to 8 feet. Placement of large fills over the clay layer will cause consolidation of the clay and subsequent settlements of the fills. If structures • are placed on or adjacent to the fills, or if fill is placed adjacent to existing structures HAOAS0671 10\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 24 ENGINEERING AIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • the settlements induced by the fills could cause damage to the structures. It is recommended that areal fills greater than 2 feet in height be placed early on to allow 60 to 90 days for any settlement to take place prior to placement of structures or infrastructure. Settlement of the ground underlying the fill areas can be monitored fairly cost effectively to ensure settlement has stopped prior to construction of structures. 5.4.7 Concrete Floor Slabs After the removal of the topsoil and organic layers or overburden, the interior floor subgrade of the structures is expected to consist of lean clay or silt. At the time of excavation, these materials must be assessed for suitability of support for interior concrete slabs. At a minimum, 4 inches of crushed gravel should be placed between the subgrade and floor slab. If soil conditions are excessively wet or soft the material should be overexcavated to a minimum of one foot and replaced with crushed washed gravel to slab grade. Moisture barriers should be placed between the • concrete slab and gravel fill. All interior concrete floor subgrade soil should be evaluated during construction by proof rolling with heavy equipment and compacting as specified. Subgrades should be proof-rolled prior to floor construction. Soft or weak areas should be either compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D 698 or over-excavated and replaced with compacted granular fill. All subgrades should be compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density at plus or minus 2 percentage points of optimum moisture content according to ASTM D 698. Because of shallow groundwater, an impermeable moisture barrier is recommended beneath the floor slabs and over crawl space subgrades. Imported gravel fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density at a moisture content of plus or minus 2 percentage points of optimum according to ASTM D 698. HA04\S067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 25 E NG IN E E It ING 5.4.8 Seismicity The project site is located within Seismic Zone 3 (seismic zone factor of 0.30) on the seismic risk map of the United States as also shown in Figure No. 16-2 of the Uniform Building Code(1997). As presented previously, the soil profile consists of surficial clay deposits varying in thickness from one to seven feet overlying dense gravel. Based on the soil profiles encountered in the borings at depths greater than 4 to 7 feet, the soil profile type is classified as Sd ("stiff'soil profile). The majority of the structures located at the site will be placed on the dense native gravel or imported structural fill. • 5.5 Site Earthwork 5.5.1 General Given the relatively flat site grades, it is anticipated that minimal site grading work will be required. 5.5.2 Fill Placement Prior to fill placement under pavement areas and concrete slab locations, the subgrade should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches and compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density at a water content of plus or minus 2 percentage points of optimum moisture content according to ASTM D 698. Subgrades should be "proof rolled" prior to fill placement. Soft areas should be over-excavated and replaced with structural fill as defined on the next page. • H:\04\S067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 26 ENGINEERING • Under concrete slabs and walkways: Not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density at a water content of plus or minus 2 percentage points of optimum according to ASTM D 698. General site grading oversite fill: Not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density at optimum moisture content according to ASTM D 698. Fill should be placed and compacted in horizontal lifts,using equipment and procedures that will produce uniform moisture contents and densities throughout the lift. Material placement lifts for site grading fill and fill beneath slabs.and pavements should not exceed 8 inches in thickness. Material placement lifts for structural fill should not exceed'6-inches in thickness: 5.5.3 Excavation Excavation of the onsite soils may be achieved using conventional excavation equipment. All temporary excavations must conform to OSHA Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR Part 1926.652 Appendix B to Subpart P. Overburden soils coupled with groundwater conditions at the facility location are indicative of Type C soils according to OSHA classification criteria. Type C soils require excavation slope angles not exceed 1.5H:1 V (Horizontal to Vertical). Soil conditions should be verified at the time of excavation to ensure compliance with OSHA requirements. 5.5.4 Surface Drainage: Surface grading adjacent to all structures should provide positive flow away from the structure. H:\04\5067110\Geotech\W WindGTReport.doc 27 ENGINEERING • 6.0 LEVHTATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report assume that site conditions are not substantially different than those exposed by the explorations. If, during construction, subsurface conditions different from those encountered in the explorations are observed or appear to be present, we should be advised at once so that we can review those conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. If there is a substantial lapse of time between submission of our report and the start of work at the site, and conditions have changed due to natural causes or construction operations at or near the site, it is recommended that this report be reviewed to determine the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations considering the changed conditions. This report was prepared for the use of the Owner and Engineer in the preliminary planning of the development. It should be made available to prospective contractors for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions. • Any conclusions by a construction contractor or bidder relating to construction means,methods, techniques, sequences, or costs based upon the information provided in this report are not the responsibility of the Owner or HKM. The contractors and bidders are encouraged to perform additional investigations necessary to develop subsurface data for construction purposes. • HA04\S067110\Gectech\WWindGTReport.doc ?8 MUNAMM E NG INEEEING APPENDIX A LOGS OF EXPLORATION BORINGS AND TEST PITS Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-1 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER west West LLC PROJECT HKM Engineering E Northwest 4Section Township t t Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS LL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ W W W& PL ��—; ILL ADDITIONAL U O a 8 W a W DATAI z y W U? Gi REMARKS x = a w a 30 2 'o U O N VALUE ❑ BLOWSIFr o Surface Elevation:4707.9 c� w a m z ?? a 10 20 30 40 12"Topsoil and organic matter 4707.5 6 7 7 1 16/18 ❑ 706. 89% Lean clay(CL),stiff to soft,moist to very moist, brown to light brown 2.5 3 Lab Sample#19133@ 4705 2 MC=36.9% 1 2/18 2 11% ❑ • 703.4 2 Lab Sample#19134: 95— Clayey gravel(GC),compact to very dense,very 1 USCS=CL moist to saturated,light brown to brown 702 10 3 13/18 Gravel=15% 72% Sand=17% Fines=68% Liquid Limit-33 Placticity Index=15 MC=23.9% 5 4700 14 10 23 697. 20 4 12118 ❑ 67% 2.5 4695 14 27 24 5 6/18 1 15 33% 692. -15.5 4692.4- Boring terminated at 15.5 feet Groundwater observed at 4 feet on 1/7/04 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, 7.5 sand pack to T, bentonite seal to 4',well stick-up of 1.6'sheathed with 4"PVC protective case. HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 N 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G �■ Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUndertlill Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-2 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER west West LLC HKM Engineering Off.. PROJECT NorthwestSection W t Subdivision SAMPLES I TESTS LL rn MATERIAL DESCRIPTION qo a o z W W PL �T� LL D TAI ADDITIONAL x x a w V) w L)? lz lz REMARKS a.w Surface Elevation:4712.9 K OJ Z z OU N VALUE ❑ BLOWS✓FT o c9 w o m z a 10 20 30 40 ° 10"Topsoil and organic matter :: 712. 3 3 4 1 12/18 ❑ 712.07 Bulk 67% Lab Sample#19138: Lean clay(CL),firm to soft, moist to very moist, USCS=CL brown to light brown Gravel=O% Sand=11% Fines=89% 2 5 Liquid Limit--39 4710 2 Placticity Index=20 1 Max Unit Wt.=103.Opcf 2 2 6/18 ❑ 0 Opt Mosture=19.7% 33% CBR=4.9 MC=23.9% Lab Sample#19139: MC=24.7% 2 1 s 707 Clayey gravel(GC),compact,very moist to 707. 10 3 72%8 saturated,dark brown s 4705 703.4 :. 9 10 Interbedded poorly graded sand and poorly 26 i.4: graded gravel (SP/GP),dense,saturated,brown :�::• 702.5 30 6/18 4 33% y�tlf. 2.5 x "K!: 4700 .A::. •:Yu► 95 J�' 18 15 25 ON 8 .. w . 16. 696. Boring terminated at 16 feet Groundwater observed at 7 feet on 12/19/03 7.5 Cave to 6 feet HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 N 222 North 32nd St. DRILL co. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GLInderhill Project No.:4So67.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-3 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER west West LLC HKM Engineering E PROJECT prthwest 1/4,Section W S Ip 2 South.RanceS iV i0 SAMPLES TESTS 0 to it z U) W.C. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL _V a >W a W PL t �-I LL DATA/ H x Qay W 0 m w 5 Y g REMARKS Ix o Surface Elevation:4717.9 w o tozz z z a N VALUE 2 D DLO W SIFT ° 10"Topsoil and organic matter :: 4717.5 5 9 7 1 12118 717.07 Bulk 67% Lab Sample#19143: Lean clay(CL),stiff,moist,brown uscs=cL Gravel=3% Sand=7% 5 Fines=90% 2.5 2. 715.4 6 Liquid Limit=36 Silt ML ,stiff,slightly moist,light brown 4715 6 2 78% PlasticityWt=1 18 ( ) g y g 78^io Max Unit Wt=103.5pcf Opt Mosture=18.7% CBR=4.9 MC=12.5% Lab Sample#19144: 24/24 MC=11.1% SH1 100% 5 712. 712.4 Silty gravel(GM),very dense,slightly moist to 2a saturated, light brown 30 3 8/18 44% 5 4710 708.4 r . 13 Poorly graded gravel with sand(GP),very dense •�' 22 10 t•'' 35 5/18 to compact,saturated,dark brown 707. 4 28% a 2.5 4705 �a MN 6 .� 13 15 •• 10• 702. 5 18/18 O y: 100% -16.0 4701. Boring terminated at 16 feet Groundwater observed at 9.2 feet on 1M04 41san,, d nitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, pack to T, bentonite seal to 3', well stick-up .4'sheathed with 4"PVC protective case. HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 N 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 � Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck ENGINEE RING OGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GU rh ndeill Fax: (406)656-6398 FL AdIlk Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-4 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER west West LLC PROJECT HKM Engineering 'E SectionNorthwest 1/4. anae East West Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS o h MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 zo a z aw PL l—a 1 LL D TA/ADDITIONAL �> z w w U? aru REMARKS a LLj W p f WO U O N VALUE D BLOWS/Fr o Surface Elevation:4717.2 0 w o m z ?? a Ir 10 20 30 40 ° 11"Topsoil and organic matter 4 5 8 1 14/18 Lab Lean clay(CL),stiff, moist,brown 716 2 Bulk 78°�° USCS=CLIe#19150: Gravel=0% Sand=10% 4715 Fines=90% 2.5 2 Liquid Limit--36 3 Placticity Index=18 Max Unit WL=104.8pcf 4 2 22% D 0 Opt Mosture=18.1% CBR=8.0 MC--28.6%Min Resistivity-- - 1770 Ohm-Cm 712. SH1 100% pH=8.0 5 10% SO4=ND Lab Sample#19151: 711.7 25 MC=25.1% Poorly graded gravel with clay and cobble(GP), 35 Lab Sample#19152: very dense,saturated, brown �'' 27 9/18 2 Unit wt.=96.1pcf .+•• 3 50% Unconfined Strength= 0.64 qu ksf • Unconfined Cohesion= +• 4710 0.32 qW2 ksf .5— MC=26.9% r .• .b• 707.7 : . ' 707. 6 Interbedded poorly graded sand and poorly 1a 10 graded gravel (SP/GP),dense,saturated,brown 22 4 7/1°8 39/0 'w 4705 .r 2.5 ?'s ....lam :z' y :!;`�: 12 y.' 702. 19 9/18 15 y' S 50% b* -15.5 1701.7-` Boring terminated at 15.5 feet Groundwater observed at 5.5 feet on 12/19/03 Cave to 5 feet 7.5 HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 222 North 32nd St. DRILL co. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 P7I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill i I Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-5 Sheet 1 of 2 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Qwest West LLC HKM Engineering 0- PROJECT Northwest Section 2 w hi South. n e 5Eas West Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS 0 lz m W Q lY W.C. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° a a~ ADDITIONAL A L rz WW PL LL DATA/W U O to WW REMARKS a W m 0. 3 Y N VALUE ❑ BLOWSIFT o Surface Elevation:4719.3 0 w o m z i i a 1 10 20 30 0 ° 10"Topsoil and organic matter 3 a 4. 718.47 ��± 5 1 4/18 Lean clay(CL),firm,slightly moist to very moist, brown 4717.Er 2.5 2 Lab Sample#19157, 3 MC=26.7% 2 12/18 2 67% ❑ • 4715 714. 16 Clayey gravel(GC),dense,very moist to 20 5 saturated,dark brown 19 3 13118 72% 712. 5 4710 709. 12 Poorly graded gravel with sand (GP),dense, 1' is • 10 saturated,dark brown p` 17 4 11/18 �. 61% 707. i.� 2.5 .ti. ;,•aL ' 4705 14 19 15 :! 29 5 2118 • . 11% --16.0 4703.3- Boring terminated at 16 feet Groundwater observed at 5.4 feet on 1/7/04 7.5 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, sand pack to T,bentonite seal to the surface,well stick-up of 1.5'sheathed with 4"PVC protective HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 H 222 North 32nd St. DRILL co. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY IN Peterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-6 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER west West LLC HKM Engineering PROJECT u west 1/4,Section owns ' South, 5East WestWinds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS LL m Ir z~ W.C. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONcc cJi 0 a >W n.w PL i I LL DATAI z co w U? Ci Gi REMARKS a w 3 o Surface Elevation:4729.7 m o m z z z o N VALUE D BLOWS/FT 10 20 30 40 D 12"Topsoil and organic matter 7 6 6 1 15/18 1. 728.7 83% Lean clay(CL),firm, moist, brown 727. 2.5--2.5 4727.23 Lab Sample#19162: Silt with scattered gravel(ML),stiff,slightly moist, 5 MC=9.6% light brown 10 2 10/18 D 56% 725. 4725 12 Lab Sample#19163: Poorly graded gravel with silt and sand(GP-GM), 18 USCS=GP-GM 5 dense to very dense,slightly moist to saturated, 23 3 13/18 Gravel=56% light brown 72% Sand=36% Fines=8% Liquid Limit--NP Placticity Index=NP MC=3.7% 722. 5 LZ 4720 14 19 10 22 4 8/18 44% 717. 2.5 14 28 4715 37 5 12/18 5 15 67% 15.5 714. Boring terminated at 15.5 feet Groundwater observed at 9 feet on 12/19/03 Cave to 3.5 feet 7.5 r ' HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 H 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson I APPROVED BY GUnderhill Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-7 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER 0'_E'E PROJECT west West LLC HKM En ineerin orthwest 1/4.Section th e 5Eas WestWinds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS LL W wz~ W.C. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION v zo a Lu w a w PL ��—I LL DATAJ z y w S Z � REMARKS F 0. ¢ w 3 m w0 x2 O N VALUE 0 BLOWS/FT o Surface Elevation:4727.9 w o _5 z ?z a� 0 20 30 40 D 12"Topsoil and organic matter :: 727. 3 4 .3 1 14/18 0 1. 726. 78% Lean clay(CL),firm,moist to very moist,brown 2.5 2 Lab Sample#191684 4725 2 MC=22.7% 5 10/18 2 56% O • 723.4 Poorly graded gravel with sand and cobble(GP), 19 5 compact to very dense,moist to saturated,brown ; 722 25 3 8/18 0 ..•• 44% P • Z:T w 5 .ti• 4720 _ hh ••t `•j 6 �.. 10 717. 13 4 13/•18 0 .S• 72/6 • 10 .L� 12.5- 4715 44 .f ;. s'• .ty�. i•? 23 15 50/ 5 2/11 �• 712. 5• 18% -15.5 4712.4- Boring terminated at 15.5 feet Groundwater observed at 7.1 feet on 1/7/04 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, 7.5 sand pack to 8',bentonite seal to the surface,well stick-up of 1.8'sheathed with 4"PVC protective case. HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 H 222 North 32nd St. DRILL Co. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buc E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 kk Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill Project No.:4So67.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-8 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER 'E west West LLC HKM Engineering PROJECT i)rthwest 1/4,Section w South. Ranae Eas West Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o � it z~ W.C. ADDITIONAL z0 w 0 z a W PL ��� LL DATA/ U z m a. w 0 z REMARKS a a +�+ 3 cow� 1� w -J 0 N VALUE 0 BLOWS/FT o Surface Elevation:4728.7 c� w 0 0 V m 'z ?? a1 to 20 30 ao 12"Topsoil and organic matter 2 3 4 1 14/18 727.7 ..... 727. 78% Lean clay(CL),soft to firm,moist to very moist, brown 2 Lab Sample#19173: 2.5 2 2 8/18 O • MC=33.9% 44% 4725 Lab Sample#19174: USCS=CL Gravel=3% SH1 24/04 Sand=9% 100/o Fines=88% 5 Liquid Limit=32 Placticity Index=11 4723.. 14 MC=29.4% Clayey gravel(GC),dense,saturated, brown 72z 16 y18 Unit Wt.=87.7pcf 3 Unconfined Strength= 11% 0.26 qu ksf Unconfined Cohesion= 0.13 qu/2 ksf 5 4720 719. Poorly graded gravel with sand and cobble(GP), '': is 10 compact to very dense,saturated, brown 14 4 fi/18 s4' '�• 717. • ii. Jjy •ti• 2.5 � t 42 3• 50/ 5 0/9 'j'$' 4715 3• 0% 4. 714.7 ' Boring terminated at 14 feet 15 Groundwater observed at 5.5 feet on 12/19/03 Cave to 5 feet 7.5 • HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 *INNP^ 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill Project No.:4So67.110 .LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-9 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER west West LLC HKM En ineerin E PROJECT NorthwestSection South. es Winds ubd' 'sio SAMPLES TESTS LL m W z~ W.C. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION v zo a. >z Uj a w PL F LL DATA/ _ z cow U a t�ru REMARKS a a a p f it o cYi p N VALUE ❑ BLOWSIFT o Surface Elevation:4736.3 0 w o m z z z °a to 20 30 40 12"Topsoil and organic matter 2 3 4 1 14/18 ❑ 735. 78% Silt(ML),stiff to very stiff,moist, light brown 147 2.5 8 Lab Sample#191787 9 MC=8.5% 16 9/18 2 50% ❑ 4.5 731. 13Poorly graded gravel with sand and cobble(GP), 26 5dense to very dense,slightly moist to saturated, 28 3 8/18 brown `4% yet .ti• 5 �ti..'. 727.. t ;s `,•;; 20 10 •;� 1s 16 4 7/18 • 13 39% •L• 4725 • Mrt. 2.5 t 722. �• 40 •� 50/ 4/12 A. 67. 5 33% 15 5. 721. Boring terminated at 15 feet Groundwater observed at 9.5 feet on 12/19/03 Cave to 3 feet 7.5 HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 "Cnft Billings, MT 59101 ENGINEER I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-1 • PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4709.36 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 6 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Z USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE Y W PCf % DEPTH GRAPHIC j m � 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Moist Many roots. Slightly plastic. 0 1.0 4708 CL- Silty clay to clayey silt. Medium brown with ML slight yellowish brown tint. Moist. Slightly plastic. 2 • oo 4706 oo 5 4704 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 5"minus cobbles. Saturated at 6 feet. 6 4702 8 9.0 4700 Total depth 9.0 feet. . 10 • 4698 Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.13 to 8.87 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-2 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4711.62 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 4.67feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w Uses DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j � pcf �0 m 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Many roots. Slightly plastic. 0 Ao 4710 1.7 2 oo CL-ML Silty clay. Yellowish brown.Moist.Moderately plastic. • 3 CL-ML Silty clay to clay. Lean and moderate to highly plastic. 4708 Some silt lenses and scattered 3"to 6"minus cobbles from 4 5.0 to 7.0 feet. 4706 6 7.0 5 1 -- 119 GP-GM Poorly graded silty clay with cobbles. 4704 8 8.5 Total depth 8.5 feet. 4702 10 • 4700 Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.67 to 8.33 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-3 • PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4712.54 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 5 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y W USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC m P �° 0 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Moist 4712 Many roots. Slightly plastic. 0 1 108.4 16.2 Maximum density and optimum moisture. oo LL-28 PL-11 2 2.1 CL-ML Silty clay. Medium brown to yellowish brown. Moist. • 4710 Many roots.Slightly plastic. o 3.7 4 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 5"minus cobbles and few 8"minus cobbles. Saturated at 5 feet. 4708 6 4706 7.5 Total depth 7.5 feet. 8 4704 10 4702 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -2.52 to 7.48 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-4 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4720.35 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 4 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION PD�ENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j Z m � 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Moist 4720 Many roots. Slightly plastic. M-S 0 Silty sandy gravel with scattered 8"minus cobbles. Medium brown. Moist.Moderate roots.Saturated at 4 2 feet. 4718 • 4 _ 4716 5 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 8"minus cobbles. 6 4714 7.0 Total depth 7.0 feet. 8 4712 10 4710 Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -3.35 to 6.65 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-5 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4721.06 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jun Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 4.0 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j >_ Pd % 0 A ACL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Many roots. Slightly plastic. 0 4720 1.9 2 CL-ML Silty clay. Light yellowish brown.Moist.Moderately XXXI plastic. Moderate roots. lo • 4718 3.3 GP-GM Silty sandy gravel with moderate amount of 5"to 8"minus cobbles. Saturated at 4.0 feet. 4 4716 6 4714 7.5 Total depth 7.5 feet. 8 4712 10 • 4710 Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -2.6 to 7.4 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-6 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Windst 4721.32 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 3.0 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y W USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j >_ pd �0 m o 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Many roots. Slightly plastic. To CL-ML 0 4720 Silty clay. Light gray to yellowish brown.Moist. lo Moderately plastic. Moderate roots. 2 lo • _ 3.0 4718 GP-GM Poorly graded silty sandy gravel with moderate amount of 5"to 8"minus cobbles. Saturated at 3.0 feet. 4 4716 6 7.0 4714 Total depth 7.0 feet. 8 4712 10 • 4710 . Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -3.48 to 6.52 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-7 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Pro erties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4734.68 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 8.5 When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Z USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE Y W Pcf % DEPTH GRAPHIC > >_ m � 0 00 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Many 4734 roots. Slightly plastic. 0 1.3 CL-ML Silty clay. Yellowish brown. Slightly moist to dry. Moderately plastic. Moderate roots. 2 oo oo • 4732 4 4730 5.7 6 GP-GM Poorly graded silty sandy gravel with few to moderate amount of 5"to 8"minus cobbles.Saturated at 8.5 feet. 4728 8 4726 9.25 Total depth 9.25 feet. 10 4724 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -0.79 to 9.21 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-8 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4737.86 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 10.5 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS j=- w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE PCf /. DEPTH GRAPHIC O 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Moist. Many roots. Slightly plastic. 0 1 101.7 20.4 Maximum density and optimum moisture. 4736 CL-ML LL-35 PL-17 2 15 Clayey silt. Medium brown to yellowish brown.Slightly • moist.Many roots to 4 feet.Not plastic. oo oo 4734 4 lo 4732 6 6.0 GP-GM Silty sandy gravel with moderate to few 6"minus cobbles. Saturated at 10.5 feet. 4730 8 4728 10 • 11.5 Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.63 toll.34 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-8 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4737.86 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 10.5 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Z USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE 0 DEPTH GRAPHIC j Z Pcf �° 00 O 4726 12 Total depth 11.5 feet. 4724 14 • 4722 16 4720 18 4718 20 4716 22 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.63 to 11.34 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-9 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4738.57 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 9.0 When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH :GGR:APHIC j >_ PCf % m Of 0 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Moist 4738 Many roots. Slightly plastic. 0 CL-MI 0 107.4 18.0 Clayey silt. Medium brown to yellowish brown.Slightly moist.Many roots to 6.0 feet. Slightly plastic. 2 1 o Maximum density and optimum moisture. • 4736 LL-31 PL-12 I 'o oll ol 4734 5.8 6 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 3"to 6". Few 8"to 10"cobbles.Saturated at 9.0 feet. 4732 8 4730 9.5 Total depth 9.5 feet. 10 4728 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.13 to 8.87 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-1 a • PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4709.36 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 6 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j Z pd �' m � 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Moist Many roots. Slightly plastic. 0 1.0 4708 CL-ML Silty clay to clayey silt. Medium brown with slight yellowish brown tint. Moist. Slightly plastic. 2 • ol el IoS 4706o 4 10 4704 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 5"minus cobbles. Saturated at 6 feet. 6 4702 8 9.0 4700 Total depth 9.0 feet. 10 • 4698 Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.13 to 8.87 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-2a PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE LOCATION Cascade Homes 4/8/03 ELEV. West Winds 4711.62 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 4.67feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y > USCS DESCRIPTION PDEENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j m 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Many roots. Slightly plastic. 000xx 0 4710 1.7 2 CL-ML Silty clay. Yellowish brown.Moist.Moderately plastic. • 3 CL-ML Silty clay to clay. Lean and moderate to highly plastic. 4708 Some silt lenses and scattered 3"to 6"minus cobbles from 4 00 05.0 to 7.0 feet. 4706 6 7.0 GP-GM Poorly graded silty clay with cobbles. 4704 8 8.5 Total depth 8.5 feet. 4702 10 • 4700 Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.67 to 8.33 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. HKM Engineering Inc. • F.XPT.nR ATION LOG LEGEND Qp Unconfined compressive strength(tons/f?)as indicated by pocket penetrometer. N Number of blows required to drive a standard 2-inch O.D.split spoon penetrometer 12 inches into the soil by a 140- pound hammer dropping freely a distance of 30 inches. The blows recorded in the final 12 inches are the"N'value. M Natural soil moisture content N) L.L. Liquid limit(%) P.I. Plasticity index adrnax Maximum dry unit weight pbsA),as determined by ASTM D 698. 6 Angle of internal friction of soil(°) • c Cohesion of soil(lbs./fig) M.C.Opt. Optimum soil moisture content(%) CBR California bearing ratio SO4 Sulphate content(%)—indicates soil corrosivity potential to concrete. pH Indicates acidity or alkalinity of soil. Minimum Indicates soil corrosivity potential to buried metal(ohm-cm). Resistivity *BULK Large Sack or bucket *SSS Split spoon soil sample *SH Shelby tube(undisturbed)soil sample *Labels also coaespond to the figure number in Appendix Bon which additional information is presented. 1 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i cD m cD cD cD cD cD cD cD cD m cD co cD co co LAB NUMBER -1 V -I O O O 0 L 0 0 .0, A W W W W C OD A W Co W N V N " O A W (D OD A W o m rn CO) 4 ...� i Wa) caco AWcocao3 pWWWWWW O 2222222222222222 LOCATION (0OD00 -I0) Otn � � A W W NNii N N W N N A N N A N i N i N i A N C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .n 6(n Ut O Cn (n Cn Ut O (n O 0 0 Cn O U DEPTH RANGE ocnv, 0000inooin0000 N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O Z CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL co OD oco 0 0 (0 CD SMALLER THAN 0.075 mm N SAND NO.200(0.075 mm) C (o 0 TO N0.4(4.76 mm) � GRAVEL NO.4(4.76 mm) D w 0) o w o U, TO 3 IN.(76.2 mm) X O o O O 00 COBBLES 3 IN.(76.2 mm) 0 TO 5 IN.(127 mm) n OVERSIZE LARGER � 3:THAN 5 IN.(127 mm) N N co LIMIT-% D r 0 0 No cn PLASTICITY INDEX-% "a 0 0 0 MAXIMUM DRY UNIT ;' W w WEIGHT(D698}pcf m OD in o X OPTIMUM MOISTURE w co CONTENT m i Gn v N OD UNIT WT.-DRY PCF m m 0 o UNCONFINED-STRENGTH -1 Op qu ksf m N 0 o UNCONFINED-COHESION C W N qu/2 ksf- aD Ln A CALIFORNIA BEARING o � (D RATIO ON CA) NwONNNK) — N) W NW co w N . 0) 0) cn OD i N ? w w rn NATURAL MOISTURE- ? (DPI V O) V (Di -0) cn -1 -l (DCD -1 m � Resistivity(Ohm-Cm) 2 o Natural Moisture Z n ODResistivity(Ohm-Cm) o Saturated < m CO) N � o pH v 0 O A Z z WATER SOLUBLE SO4-% ATTERBERG LIMITS 60 50 40 CH or OH x. w 30 eNo 20 '` • MH or H 10 CL-ML Mi. or OL 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Liquid Limit,% 4S067.110 WEST WINDS SUBDIVISION Particle Size Distribution Report 100 : 7- 80--- 70 UJI M Z u- Z 50 --- IX UJI W 40 30--- 20 10 • 0 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0 15 17 68 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Sandy lean clay with gravel I in. 100 .75 in. 93 .5 in. 91 .375 in. 89 Afterberg Limits #4 85 PL= 18 LL= 33 Pl= 15 #10 82 #20 80 Coefficients #40 78#80 75 D85= 4.75 D60= D50=#100 73 D30= D15= D10= #200 68 CU= CC= Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(8) Remarks Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-12-04 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 19134 Source of Sample: Bore Hole Date: 1-22-04 • Location: BH-1 C ElevJDepth: 4.5-6.0' Client: Quest HKM ENGINEERING, INC.- Project: West Winds Subdivision Project No: 4S067.110 Figure 01 Particle Size Distribution Report • 5 .5 5 g 100 -LI 90 0 70 w w Z ILL Z 50 w LLJ 40--- 11:1 A I II: I I I I (L 30 20 10 • 0 1 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm %COBBLES ;/6 GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0 0 11 89 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Lean clay .375 in. 100 #4 100 #10 99 #20 98 Afterbeng Limits #40 97#80 93 PL= 19 LL= 39 Pl= 20 #100 93 Coefficients #200 89 D85= D60= D56= D30= D15= Dlo=, Cu- cc Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(18) Remarks Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-12-04 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 19138 Source of Sample: Bore Hole Date: 1-23-04 • Location: BH-2 ElevJDepth: 1.0-5.0' Client: Quest West LLC HKM ENGINEERING, INC. Project: West Winds Subdivision Project No:. 4S067.110 Figure 02 Particle Size Distribution Report C! r 0 100 so 80 70 LLI 60 Z LL F- Z 50--- U.J U I MIN I I I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 LU 40 0. 30 - 20--- 10• - O-M 500 .100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0 3 7 90 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Lean clay 1.5 in. 100 I in. 99 .75 in. 98 .5 in. 97 Afterberg Limits .375 in. 97 PL= 18 LL= 36 Pl= 18 #4 97 #.10 97 Coefficients #20 97#40' 96 D85= D60= D50= #80 94 D30= D15= D10= #100 94 CU= CC= #200 90 Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(16) Remarks Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-12-04 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 19143 Source of Sample: Bore Hole Date: 1-23-04 • Location:' BH-3 ElevJDepth: 1.0-5.0' Client: Quest West LLC HKM ENGINEERING, INC. Project: West Winds Subdivision Project No: 4S067.110 Figure 03 Particle Size Distribution Report ci C! S s s gg gg 8 0 8 100 IN III [if I 80 70 W 60 Z ILL Z 50 UJI W 40 --- 1 f I 0. L 30 20 10 • OL 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0 0 10 90 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Lean clay .375 in. 100 #4 100 #10 100 #20 99 Afterbeng Limits #40 98 PL= 18 LL= 36 Pl= 18 #80 95 #100 95 Coefficients #200 90 D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= CU= CC= Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(16) Remarks Sampled by:FKM Engineering Inc. Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-12-04 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 19150 Source of Sample: Bore Hole Date: 1-23-04 • Location: BH-4 Elev./Depth: 1.0-5.0' Client: Quest West LLC HKM ENGINEERING, INC. Project: West Winds Subdivision Project No: 4S067.110 Figure 04 Particle Size Distribution Report • S S 5 C 55 • gg 100 90 80 70 W 60 Z LL Z 50 W N I !Y W 40 OL 30 20 10 • 0 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0 56 36 1 8 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC." PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Poorly graded gravel with silt and sand 1.5 in. 100 1 in. 84 .75 in. 67 5 in. 57 Atterberg Limits. .375 in. 54 PL= NP LL= NP PI= NP #4 44 #10 33 Coefficients #20 24 D 25.9 D 15.5 D 7.04 #40 17 D85 1.51 D60 0.333 D50 0.150 #80 11 #100 10 Cu— c30=103.22 C15 0.99 10 #200 7.6 Classification USCS= GP-GM AASHTO= A-1-a Remarks Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-12-04 (no specification provided) Sample No. 19163 Source of Sample: Bore Hole Date: 1-23-04 • Location: BH-6 ' ElevJDepth: 4.5-6.0' Client: Quest West LLC H KM ENGINEERING, INC. Project: West Winds Subdivision Project No: 4S067.110 Figure 05 Particle Size Distribution Report • d E a 100 90--- 0 70 Z w 60 ILL Z I I f w W 40 (L 30 --- 20 10 • 0[ 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0 3 9 88 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Lean clay .75 in. 100 .5 in. 99 .375 in. 98 #4 97 Afterberg Limits #10 96 PL= 21 LL= 32 Pl= 11 #20 96 #40 95 Coefficients #80 93 D85= D O= D50= #100 92 D30= D 6 D10= #200 88 15= Cu= CC= Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(9) Remarks Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-21-04 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 19174 Source of Sample: Bore Hole Date: 1-23-04 • Location: BH-8 ElevJD6pth: 3.5-5.5' Client: Quest West LLC HKM ENGINEERING, INC Project: West Winds Subdivision Project No: 4S067.110 Figure 06 COMPACTION TEST REPORT • 109.5 107.0 104.5 00 a .N c a� v O 102.0 ZAV for Sp.G._ 2.65 • 99.5 97.0 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure A Standard Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI No.4 No.200 1.0-5.0' CL A-6(16) 28.6 N/T 36 18 0.0 90 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 104.8 pcf Lean clay Optimum moisture= 18.1 % Project No. 4S067.110 Client: Quest WestLLC Remarks: Project: West Winds Subdivision Sample No.: 19150 • Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. • Location:BH4 Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-13-04 COMPACTION TEST REPORT HKM ENGINEERING INC. Figure 03 COMPACTION TEST REPORT • 113 108 4- 103 n .N C N ZAV for Sp.G.= 98 2.65 • 93 88 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure A Standard Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI No.4 No.200 1.0-5.0' CL A-6(18) 33.7 N/T 39 20 0.0 89 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 103.0 pcf Lean clay Optimum moisture= 19.7% Project No. 4S067.110 Client: Quest West LLC Remarks: Project: West Winds Subdivision Sample No.: 19138 • Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. • Location:BH-2 Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-13-04 COMPACTION TEST REPORT HKM ENGINEERING INC. Figure 01 • COMPACTION TEST REPORT • 109.0 106.5 w 104.0 OOF a c . a� v Z 101.5 ZAV for Sp.G._ 2.65 • 99.0 96.5 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure A Standard Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G: LL PI No.4 No.200 1.0-5.0' CL A-6(16) 12.5 NIT 36 '18 3.0 90 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 103.5 pcf Lean clay Optimum moisture= 18.6% Project No. 4S067.110 Client: Quest West LLC Remarks: Project: West Winds Subdivision Sample No.: 19143 Sampled by:HKM Engineering Inc. • Location:BH-3 Date Sampled: 12-19-03 Date Tested: 1-13-04 COMPACTION TEST REPORT HKM ENGINEERING INC. Figure 02 CA&ORNIA BEARING ATIO Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) 10.0 C 8 0 —�Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) R m 2 6.0 C p' 4.0 Point#1 v 2.0 0.0 95.0 96.0 97.0 98.0 99.0 Dry Density as Molded(PCF) 140.0 N a120.0 •-•--•---------•••--------•-•••-----•-•-••--••--••••--••••••-•••••--••••------•-----------••---••••-•••--••--•---•-- ai c1o0.0 ---•-------------•-•-•------•--•--•-••------•-•--•---••••-••---•••---•---•--••-•----•---••----------••--••--•-•-•...-•--........ 80.0 -----------------•-----------•--------------•----------------------•----•--- ••- --•-•----•••-•--••----------••---••-- d 60.0 -•--. ............................................................................. c 40.0 1----------- ---•-•-------------------•-•-----------------••---------------------------------•••-......••-•-----••-•----•. c a� 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 of O vs O to 0 a o a o O O •- r- N N O O O O O O O O O O O Penetration,Inches =ASTM: D698 Maximum Dry Density: 103.0 Optimum Moisture: 19.7% TEST RESULTS Point#1 Point#2 Point#3 ATTERBERG LIMITS Percent of Maximum Dry Density 94.6% 1 `? a < LIQUID LIMIT 39 Dry Density As Molded(pcf) 97.4 ;`ur' PLASTIC LIMIT 19 Dry Density After 96 Hour Soak(pcf) 95.7 ' r `r v PLASTIC INDEX 20 ' .,.:. Moisture Content(%): f. � : �t:' 1 Before Compaction 19.8% _ ,F CLASSIFICATION > w After Compaction 20.5% USCS CL Top 1"After Soak 28.2% —Him D:*`•= -:'1*"""-� AASHTO A-6 18 Average After Soak 22.6% Swell(% of Initial Height) 0.7% r -} DESCRIPTION Surcharge Amount(psf) 102.4 ` j ."as s ,. �. `,, a;.. �� Lean clay Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) 4.9 Remarks: PROJECT: West Winds Subdivision PROJECT NO.: 4S067.110 LAB NO.: 19138 LOCATION: BH-2 SAMPLED BY: NP DEPTH: 1.0-5.0' DATE SAMPLED: 12/19/2003 SAMPLE NO.: Composite DATE TESTED: 1/16/2004 HKM ENGINEERING INC. CA&ORNIA BEARING ATIO • Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) 10.0 c 8.0 t Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) m o 6.0 Point#1 4.0 V 2.0 0.0 96.0 97.0 98.0 99.0 100.0 Dry Density as Molded(PCF) 140.0 a120.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- d c 100.0 --------•--------- y80.0 ---------------•--------------• .................................. . ................................................... 60.0 ----------------------------- •-- -----------------------•--------------------.....---------------I------------------- c A 40.0 .......... -•••-=----•-------•-•-----------------••----------••---------------------------•--------------------------•-.--•-_ c a� 0.0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w o to o w o w o w o O O •- Cl! Cl! C9 Vt 't ' w O O O O O O O O O O O Penetration,Inches ASTM: D698 Maximum Dry Density: 103.5 Optimum Moisture: 18.6% TEST RESULTS Point#1 Point#2 Point#3 ATTERBERG LIMITS Percent of Maximum Dry Density 95.0% v ,, ' SM�; LIQUID LIMIT 36 Dry Density As Molded(pcf) 98.3 <;: ; =° PLASTIC LIMIT 18 Dry Density After 96 Hour Soak(pco 97.0 'n r ?;.PLASTIC INDEX 18 Moisture Content(%): Before Compaction 18.8% ; CLASSIFICATION After Compaction 18.9% ' = +$ 4 USCS CL Top 1"After Soak 25.3% AASHTO A-6 16 Average After Soak 21.6% Swell(% of Initial Height) 0.8% y w DESCRIPTION Surcharge Amount(psf) 102.4 Lean clay Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) 5.4 rt ' Remarks: PROJECT: West Winds Subdivision PROJECT NO.: 4S067.110 LAB NO.: 19143 LOCATION: BH-3 SAMPLED BY: NP DEPTH: 1.0-5.0' DATE SAMPLED: 12/19/2003 SAMPLE NO.: Composite DATE TESTED: 1/16/2004 HKM ENGINEERING INC. CA&ORNIA BEARING ORTIO 10.0 Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) t 8.0 4 Bearing Ratio of Soaked c Sample(CBR) m o 6.04Point#1 E 4.0 0 V 2.0 0.0 97.0 98.0 99.0 100.0 101.0 102.0 Dry Density as Molded(PCF) 200.0 a. 180.0 ---------•-----------------•------------------------------•----------•- ti160.0 -------------------------------•-------------•----•--.....................-----------•....... u 120.0 ---•-•-----••--------- --•................•-••-•--•--------------•----- 100.0 ------------------------------------- - --•-- ..........----••-•-••••••-•••••-••••-•••-••----•-•-•--••--••............---•- 80.0 40.0 -----•---•------------------•-------------•-•----------••-•---•-----•-•-------•-----................---------------- c20.0 ---------------•--------------------••-•--••-•--•----------•-•--.....-•--•--•-•---------•-•••......--••.........---- a 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w o w .0w 0 w 0 w o O O 7 V7 lV Cl! Of M V V w� O O O O O O O O O O O Penetration,Inches ASTM: D698 Maximum Dry Density: 104.8 Optimum Moisture: 18.1% TEST RESULTS Point#1 Point#2 Point#3 ATTERBERG LIMITS Percent of Maximum Dry Density 94.9% �%` y sfl^n LIQUID LIMIT 36 Dry Density As Molded(pco 99.5 PLASTIC LIMIT 18 Dry Density After 96 Hour Soak(pcf) 98.8Fr ; PLASTIC INDEX 18 Moisture Content(%): `"� f, a`%Vyr Before Compaction 18.5% ' `` ;' CLASSIFICATION After Compaction 18.5% , ; �'Y``�, USCS CL _1 Top 1"After Soak 22.9% � AASHTO A-6 16 Average After Soak 22.5% Swell(% of Initial Height) DESCRIPTION Amount Surcharge s (Pr, ` 3 c Lean clay 1Y Bearing Ratio of Soaked Sample(CBR) 8.0ri �, rd Remarks: PROJECT: West Winds Subdivision PROJECT NO.: 4S067.110 LAB NO.: 19150 LOCATION: BH-4 SAMPLED BY: NP • DEPTH: 1.0-5.01, DATE SAMPLED: 12/19/2003 SAMPLE NO.: Composite DATE TESTED: 1/16/2004 HKM ENGINEERING INC. UNCONfNED COMPRESSIO(# TEST SAMPLE UNIT LOAD - KSF 1.00 0.90 0.80 N 0.70 N a -Y 0.60 N N N 0.50 0.40 N ' a 0.30 E 0 V 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.0000 0.0400 10.0800 0.1200 0.1600 0.2000 Vertical Strain -♦-Load Ksf LAB NO.: 19152 TYPE OF BREAK GRADATION ATTERBERG LIMITS SIEVE % PASSING LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTIC INDEX. CLASSIFICATION USCS AASHTO %MOISTURE 26.9 % DESCRIPTION WET UNIT WT. 121.9 PCF j DRY UNIT WT. 96.1 PCF U.C.STRENGTH,qu 0.64 KSF SPECIFIC GRAVITY COHESION (qu/2) 0.32 KSF PROJECT: West Wind Subdivision LAB NO.: 19152 PROJECT NO.: 4S067.110 SAMPLED BY: HKM LOCATION: BH-4 DATE SAMPLED: 12/19/2003 DEPTH: 4-5.5' DATE TESTED: 1/20/2004. SAMPLE NO.: SH-1 PLATE NO.: 01 HKM' ENGINEERING INC. UNCO NED COMPRESSI TEST SAMPLE UNIT LOAD - KSF 1.00 0.90. 0.80 N $ 0.70 N a. Y 0.60 V1 Vf 0.50 (N w .N 0.40 N a 0.30 E 0 v 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 Vertical Strain —+—Load Ksf LAB NO.: 19174 TYPE OF BREAK GRADATION ATTERBERG LIMITS SIEVE % PASSING LIQUID LIMIT 32 0.75 100 PLASTIC LIMIT 21 0.5 99 PLASTIC INDEX 11 0.375 98 #4 97 CLASSIFICATION #10 96 #20 96 USCS CL #40 95 AASHTO A-6 9 #80 93 %MOISTURE 29.5 % #100 92 DESCRIPTION WET UNIT WT. 113.6 PCF #200 88 Lean clay DRY UNIT WT. 87.7 PCF U.C.STRENGTH,qu 0.26 KSF SPECIFIC GRAVITY COHESION (qu/2) 0.13 KSF PROJECT: West Wind Subdivision LAB NO.: 19174 PROJECT NO.: 4S067.110 SAMPLED BY: HKM LOCATION: 131-1-8 DATE SAMPLED: 12/19/2003 DEPTH: 3.5-5.5' DATE TESTED: 1/20/2004 SAMPLE NO.: SH-1 PLATE NO.: 02 HKM ENGINEERING INC. UNCONfiNED COMPRESSIO*TEST 1.00 SAMPLE UNIT LOAD - KSF 0.90 N 0.80 0.70 0.60 aU n 0.50 0.40 N cn 2 0.30 CL E 0 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 Vertical Strain —♦—Load Ksf LAB NO.: 19152 --*—Load Ksf LAB NO.: 19174 Load Ksf LAB NO.: LAB NO.: 19152 LAB NO.: 19174 LAB NO.: SAMPLE NO.: SH-1 SAMPLE NO.: SH-1 SAMPLE NO.: LOCATION: BH-4 LOCATION: BH-8 LOCATION: DEPTH: 4=5.5' DEPTH: 3.5-5.5' DEPTH: DATE TESTED: 01/20/04 DATE TESTED: 01/20/04 DATE TESTED: TYPE OF BREAK TYPE OF BREAK TYPE OF BREAK L> %MOISTURE 26.9 % %MOISTURE 29.5 % %MOISTURE % WET UNIT WT. 121.9 PCF WET UNIT WT. 113.6 PCF WET UNIT WT. PCF DRY UNIT WT. 96.1 PCF DRY UNIT WT. 87.7 PCF DRY UNIT WT. PCF U.C.STRENGTH,qu 0.64 KSF U.C.STRENGTH,qu 0.26 KSF U.C. STRENGTH,qu KSF COHESION (qu/2) 0.32 KSF ICOHESION (qu/2) 0.13 KSF ICOHESION (qu/2) KSF PROJECT: West Wind Subdivision SAMPLED BY: HKM PROJECT NO.: 4S067.110 DATE SAMPLED: 12/19/2003 HKM ENGINEERING INC. Aft Aft GRAIN ME DISTRIBUTION TES REPORT 2 c c jc C e ! !v d v o n n o $ v g f0 A 100 90 ; 80 70 W 60 Z LL ; Z 50 ; U W 40 ll r 30 ; ; 20 ; 0 • 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm %,+3" %GRAVEL %SAND %.FINES CRS. FINE CRS. MEDIUM FINE SILT CLAY 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.2 1.0 8.1 90.1 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Lean clay .75 in. 100.0 .5 in. 99.7 .375 in. 99.6 #4 99.4 AtterberQ Limits #10 99.2 PL= 19 LL= 31 P1= 12 #20 98.9 #40 98.2 Coefficients #1100 94.9 D85= D60= D50= #200 90.1 D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(10) Remarks Sampled By:JPM M/04-08-03 Tested By:STSfiYW04-18-03 F.M=0.06 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 3 Source of Sample: Date: 04-30-03 • Location: MW9 Elev./Depth: I to 3 ft. Client: Cascade Homes HKM ENGINEERING, INC. Project: Oak St.Subdivision Project No: 04s067-169—I(O LAB ID: 1922 MOIS RE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST 110.0 • 107.5 01 105.0 U a cXI I m 0 102.5 • 100.0 ZAV for Sp.G. _ 97.5 2.55 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Water content, % .TBstspecification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure A Standard Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI No.4 No.200 1 to 3 ft. 28.4 31 12 0.6 90.1 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 107.4 pcf Lean Clay Optimum moisture= 18.0% Project No. 04s067.109 Client: Cascade Homes Remarks: Project: Oak St.Subdivision Sampled By:JP/BIW04-08-03 Tested By:JMB/HKM/04-30-03 • Location: MW9 .-MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP-TEST HKM ENGINEERING INC. LAB ID: 1922 MOIST RE-DENSITY RELATIO SHIP TEST 104 • 102 oe- 100 U Q. C a 98 • 96 ZAV for Sp.G. _ 941 2.50 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure A Standard Elev/ Classification Nat. % > %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI No.4 No.200 1 to 3 ft. CL A-6(15) 25.7 35 17 1.5 89.8 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 101.7 pcf Lean clay Optimum moisture=20.4% Project No. 04s067.109 Client: Cascade Homes Remarks: Project: Oak St.Subdivision Sampled By:JP/HKM/04-08-03 Tested By:JM 1HYJ /04-30-03 • Location:MW8 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST HKM ENGINEERING INC. LAB ID: 1921 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST 111 • 109 w 107 U a C (D v 105 • 103 ZAV for Sp.G. _ 2.55 101 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure B Standard Oversize correction applied to final results Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI 3/8 in. No.200 1 to 3 ft. 28 11 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 108.4 pcf Sandy Clay Optimum moisture= 16.2 % Project No. 04067.109 Client: Cascade Homes Remarks: Project: Oak St.Subdivision Ole Location: MW3 MOISTUR&DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST HKM ENGINEERING INC. LAB ID: 1920 T AM, AOL GRAIN TZE DISTRIBUTION TEIT REPORT < � Q � 9! o 000 0 $ 08 • m n t� n C = a a a = _ 100 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 90 Q. .. -- 17, 1 , 80 I 1 I 1 I I 70 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 w 60 Z 1 1 I 1 u- Z 50 ; 1 U � 1 1 w 40 I1 i LL. I I I 1 1 1 30 1 20 1 1 1 10 1 I 1 0 • 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm %+3" %GRAVEL %SAND %FINES CRS. FINE CRS. MEDIUM FINE SILT CLAY 4.7 2.5 3.7 1.7 6.3 16.7 64.4 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Sandy Clay 4 in. 100.0 3 in. 95.3 2 in. 95.3 1.5 in. 94.8 Afterberg Limits 1 in. 93.6 PL= 17 LL= 28 Pl= I 1 .75 in. 92.8 .5 in. 91.4 Coefficients .375 in. 90.6 #4 89.1 D85- D60= D50= #10 87.4 D30= D15= D10= #20 84.8 Cu= Cc= #40 81.1#80 74.0 Classification #100 71.9 USCS= AASHTO= #200 64.4 Remarks Sampled By:JP/HKM/04-08-03 Tested By:STS/HICM/04-17-03 F.M 4.65 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 1 Source of Sample: Date: 04-30-03 Location: MW3 Elev./Depth: 1 to 3 ft. Client: Cascade Homes HKM ENGINEERING, INC. Project: Oak St.Subdivision Project No: 04s067-1.69 O LAB ID: 1920 GRAIN IZE DISTRIBUTION TETr REPORT < < < pp • p A N A 1 A , 100 ' I 90 ; 80 70 W 60 Z Z 50 U W 40 ; 30 20 ; 10 • 0 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm %+3" %GRAVEL %SAND %FINES CRS. FINE CRS. MEDIUM FINE SILT CLAY 0.0 0.4 1.1 0.6 1.6 6.5 89.8 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC." PASS? Soil-Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Lean clay 1 in. 100.0 .75 in. 99.6 .5 in. 99.2 .375 in. 99.0 Atterberg Limits #4 98.5 PL= 18 LL= 35 PI= 17 #10 97.9 #20 97.2 Coefficients #40 96.3 #80 94.0 D85= D60= D50= #100 93.2 D30= D15= D10= #200 89.8 Cu= Cc= Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(15) Remarks Sampled By:JP/HKAV04-08-03 Tested By:STS/HYW04-17-03 F.M=0.10 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 2 Source of Sample: Date: 04-30-03 Location: MW8 Elev./Depth: 1 to3 ft. Client: Cascade Homes HWENGINEERING, INC. Project: Oak St.Subdivision Project No: 04067409— ( 0 LAB ID: 1921 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT D �, �. _: rri STORMWATER INVESTIGATION REPORT Stormwater Investigation For West Winds Planned Community Preliminary PUD Application Phase I Subdivision Prepared For: Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 • Prepared By: BKM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 March 2004 04S067.110 i lol 50 y66 PE cc �Bn • West Winds—Stormwater Investigation March 5, 2004 • Table of Contents Page Purpose ...........................................................................................................................................3 ProjectOverview.............................................................................................................................3 Preliminary Conditions Summary...................................................................................................4 Basisof Calculations........................................................................................................................5 StormwaterDetention .....................................................................................................................5 Stormwater Treatment and Release.................................................................................................9 Farmer's Canal Lateral and Section-Line Ditch............................................................................10 ConveyanceFacilities ...................................................................................................................11 Maintenance..................................................................................................................................12 A. Inspection Program.............................................................................................................12 B. Maintenance Program.........................................................................................................12 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................12 Tables • Table 1 -Residential Unit Distribution...........................................................................................3 Table2 - Area Summary.................................................................................................................4 Table 3 -West Winds Subdivision Stormwater Quantities ............................................................5 Table 4-West Winds Subdivision Stormwater Quantities.............................................................6 Table 5 -West Winds Subdivision Detention Pond Summary.......................................................9 Table 6 -West Winds Subdivision Figures Figure6.3 - Storm Water Plan.......................................................................................................6 Figure 6.3a- Storm Water Plan Section A:A..................................................................................7 Figure 7 -Example Flow Control Manhole.................................................................................10 . Appendices Appendix A -Peak Runoff Rate and Detention Pond Volume Calculations Appendix B - Conveyance Facility Calculations Page 2 of 12 E NOINEEtIN� West Winds—Stormwater Investigation March 5,2004 Purpose This engineer's report is intended to address the stormwater management system for the proposed West Winds Planned Community, and more specifically,the Phase 1 subdivision thereof. This report will determine the recommended sizing of the stormwater detention basins and conveyance facilities within the community. This report was prepared in accordance with the design criteria set forth in the City of Bozeman's Design Standards and Specifications Policy. Proiect Overview The West Winds Planned Community is a 960-unit mixed use residential development located in the northwest'/a, Section 2,Township 2 South,Range 5 East,bordered by Oak Street on the south,North 27d'Avenue on the east,Baxter Lane on the north, and Davis Lane on the west. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the project area and unit distribution. Table 1—Residential Unit Distribution (Table 6.1 PUD Application) • Senior Residential Multi-Family 21.85 . 1�1*26 246 Skilled Nursing Facility 6.53 tM1;�~22.98; 150 Subtotal 28.38 _,4'-13.95 396 Residential Single-Family 35.63 5.98 213 Town-House 8.31 11.07 92 Multi-Family 16.22 12.15 197 Apartment 4.75 13.05 62 Subtotal 64.91 8.69 564 Total 93.28 10.29 960 Table Notes: 1.Dwelling unit counts for multi-family family, SNF and apartments estimated based on maximum density. 2.Net land area excludes road R/W and parks. Page-3 of 12 ENGINEERING West Winds—Stormwater Investigation March 5, 2004 • Table 2—Area Summar Gross Property Area 161.30 Net Residential Area 93.28 Gross Park Area 22.14 Individual Parcel Open space 3.01 Permieter Road Area 12.53 Internal Road Area 30.34 Total 161.30 The subdivision also includes a linear park(West Winds Park) with a trail system alongside existing,jurisdictional wetland areas. Preliminary Conditions Summary The pre-development condition of the proposed 160-acre subdivision is agricultural with no residential structures on site. The property is currently being used for hay production. The site is not currently irrigated, but the property has water rights through the Farmer's Canal Ditch • Company. The current topography of the site can be generalized as flat with a consistent slope of approximately 2% from south to north. The subdivision has three irrigation ditches—the Section-Line Ditch that lies along the west property line, and two Farmers Canal laterals that bisect the parcel from south to north. In conjunction with the development, the most easterly Farmer's Canal Lateral will be filled and abandoned. The center irrigation lateral is a continuation of the Harvest Creek linear park to the south and is within open space on the preliminary plat of Baxter Square Subdivision to the north. This center irrigation lateral includes jurisdictional wetlands and will be preserved within a West Winds Park that will be retained in its natural state. The NRCS Soil Survey has identified three soil types on the property: Amsterdam silt loam (53B); Meadowcreek loam(510B); and Fairway silt loam(511A). These soil types correlate to the SCS Hydrologic Soil Group`B". Soil pits were excavated and groundwater monitors were installed in April 2003 and monitored through September 2003. From these pits, it was determined that the soil horizon is typical of the Bozeman area with approximately 12" of topsoil underlain with a layer of silty-clay,followed by sandy gravel. The groundwater depth varied dependant on elevation and proximity to irrigation channels with a typical minimum depth to water being in the range of 4' to 8' below ground surface within proposed housing areas. Basis of Calculations The calculations and recommendations within this report are based on the regulations set forth in • the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. The Rational Method was used to determine the pre-developed release rate and, in turn,the post-developed minimum Page 4 of 12 ENGINEERING � West Winds—Stormwater Investi ation � March 5, 2004 g • required storage volume. All calculations associated with the release rate and required storage volumes were based on a 10-year, 2-hour storm event. The conveyance facilities,described further in this report, are based on a 25-year, 2-hour storm event. Calculations are provided in Appendix E-1 of this report. Stormwater Detention The site has been divided into nine (9)on-site sub-basins for analysis: sub-basins `B-1"through "B-6D", and into four(4) off-site sub-basins "OS-1"through "OS-4", which are depicted in Figure El. A summary of the pre-developed peak runoff rate and the post-developed required storage is shown below in Table 3. The proposed detention ponds are shown in Figure 6.3. A typical cross-section of the detention facilities is shown in Figure 6.3b. Table 3-West Winds Subdivision Stormwater Quantities Basin Pre-Developed Min. Post-Developed ID Peak Runoff Rate cfs Required Storage cf B1 4.42 9605 B2 4.14 9138 B3 3.94 9068 64 3.32 7520 B5 8.89 22083 • B6-A 2.06 4484 B&B 1.50 3220 B6-C 2.58 5725 B6-D 2.62 5865 'On-parcel detention will be provided for Basins B6-A through B6-D. Water will be released and conveyed via Basin B5 storm drainage network to the B5 detention ponds that have been designed to pass the additional base flow. Sub-basin `B-1"is 19.01 Acres in size and includes residential sites, pavement and landscaping areas. Development of the sub-basin will provide approximately 40 single-family lots, 6 duplex units and 126 low-income,multi-family units. Runoff from this sub-basin flows northwest and will be collected and stored in detention pond 3. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 9605 cf. under developed conditions. Sub-basin `B-2"is 17.99 Acres in size and includes residential sites, pavement and landscaping areas. Development of the sub-basin will provide 27 single-family lots, 54 low-income, multi- family units and a community center. Runoff from this sub-basin flows northwest and will be collected and stored in detention pond 4. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 9138 cf. under developed conditions. Sub-basin `B-3"is 17.59 Acres in size and includes residential sites, pavement and landscaping areas. Development of the sub-basin will provide 89 multi-family units and a 57-unit apartment • complex. Runoff from this sub-basin flows northwest and will be collected and stored in Page 5 of 12 ENGINEERING STORM WATER i Admhk �I Wi Uj 100.0' _ ': 5: .''�; VARIES RIGHT—OF—WAY �4 u y I j � �' 2' MAX DEPTH . WATER �14"C 1,: .f — . 5 LANDSCAPED DETENTION POND SECTION A:A (SEE NOTE 1) TYPICAL STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITY NOT TO SCALE DETENTION POND NOTES: 1. DETENTION PONDS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH TREES ON SLOPES AND SOD. 2. DETENT70N PONDS SHALL BE DRY PONDS WITH POSITIVE DRAINAGE. J. PONDS SHALL HAVE GRADUAL SLOPE TO FACILITATE MOWING AND EGRESS, 0 WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y ' NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. 'A H GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA j ENO INlIRING HKM Engineering Inc. STORM WA TER PL A N McChesney Profes a 01 Niides Dr.,Suite nal Bldg. SECTION A:A Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)586-8834 FIGURE 6.30 3 FAX(406)586-1730 6 DATE FEB.1.1004 PROJECT NO.04SD07.110 Copylghl O 1004 1111M Engt—Ing Inc.,AD R10tR R"wv". 0 0 West Winds—Stormwater Investigation March 5 2004 • detention ponds 5 and 6. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 9068 cf. under developed conditions. Sub-basin `B-4" is 14.67 Acres in size and includes residential sites,pavement and landscaping areas. Development of the sub-basin will provide 18 single-family lots and 22 duplex units. Runoff from this sub-basin flows northwest and will be collected and stored in detention pond 6. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 7520 cf. under developed conditions. Sub-basin `B-5"is 41.71 Acres in size and includes residential sites,pavement and landscaping areas. Development of the sub-basin will provide 132 single-family lots and 30 duplex units. Runoff from this sub-basin flows northeast and will be collected and stored in detention ponds 7 and 8. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 22,083 cf. under developed conditions. Sub-basin `B-6"has been further divided into four sub-basins: "B-6A"through `B-6D". The collective area of these sub-basins is 38.01 Acres in size and includes residential sites, a senior assisted-living center, community center, pavement and landscaping areas. Development of the sub-basin will provide a 150-unit senior assisted-living center and an anticipated 246 additional units—including townhouses and cottages—upon full development of those parcels. Runoff from this sub-basin flows northeast and will be collected and stored in 4 on-site detention ponds. The anticipated minimum,combined storage volume for the four sub-basins is 19,294 cf. under developed conditions. Sufficient detention storage will be provided following development of • the senior/assisted living parcels. Following detention,the stormwater from these four sub- basins will be released into the Basin B5 storm drainage network where it will be conveyed to detention ponds 7 and 8. These ponds have been designed to handle the additional stormwater. In addition to the on-site basins, four(4) off-site basins were identified for analysis. Sub-basins "OS-l" through "OS-4". These off-site basins will handle the stormwater runoff from the development's portion of Oak Street, Baxter Lane, N. 27`h Avenue, and Davis Lane. Table 2 provides a summary of the pre-developed runoff rates and post-developed required storage. Table 4-West Winds Subdivision Stormwater Quantities Basin Pre-Developed Min.Post Developed ID Peak Runoff Rate cfs Required Storage cf OS-1 1.46 1329 OS-2 1.10 1001 OS-3 1.22 1108 OS-4 1.23 1109 Sub-basin "OS-1"is 3.57 Acres in size and includes West Oak Street. Development of this street will include 31 ft. of road width, 12 ft. median, 8 ft. boulevard and 5 ft. sidewalk. Runoff from • this sub-basin flows northeast and will be collected and stored in detention ponds 1 and 2. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 1329 cf. Page 8 of 12 E N 0 ... I W. 0 West Winds—Stormwater Investigation March 5, 2004 • Sub-basin "OS-2"is 2.69 Acres in size and includes North 27t'Avenue. Development of this street will include 24 ft. of road width,7 ft. median, 5.5 ft.boulevard and 5 ft. sidewalk. Runoff from this sub-basin flows north and will be collected and stored in detention ponds 3,4 and 5. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 1001 cf. Sub-basin "OS-3"is 2.98 Acres in size and includes Baxter Lane. Development of this street will include 24 ft. of road width, 19 ft. boulevard and 5 ft. sidewalk. Runoff from this sub-basin flows east and will be collected and stored in detention ponds 6,7 and 8. The anticipated minimum storage volume for this basin is 1108 cf. Sub-basin "OS-4"is 2.99 Acres in size and includes Davis Lane. Development of this street will include 24 ft. of road width, 11 ft. median, 8.5 ft. boulevard and 5 ft. sidewalk. Runoff from this sub-basin flows north and will be collected and stored in detention ponds 7 and 8. Table 5, shown below,provides a summary of the 8 proposed detention ponds including overall capacity and capacity at a water depth of 2 feet. The detention pond volumes were calculated using the prismoidal method and are based on the pond geometry shown in Figure 6.3a. Table 5-West Winds Subdivision Detention Pond Summary Detention Total Volume Provided Storage Required Storage • Pond CF Volume CF Use CF 1 9,456 3,791 532 2 3,029 1,170 400 3 29,764 12,082 10,336 4 27,484 9,870 9,472 5 18,088 7,107 4,868 6 36,877 13,757 12,423 7 104,129 45,629 21,610 8 96,665 39,782 21,610 Stormwater Treatement and Release The stormwater detention ponds have been designed for the removal of solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants. The ponds have been sized to provide adequate volume and detention time to allow the settling of solids, silts and other contaminants. The flow control outlet structures for the detention ponds will be equipped with oil/water separates to retain oil runoff from the parking and roadway surfaces. Stormwater will be released from the detention ponds at a rate equal to that of the 10-year pre- developed storm event. Release will be accomplished through a flow control manhole equipped with a orifice outlet. Orifice sizing is primarily driven by elevation and head, which requires site-specific designs for each detention pond. Detailed orifice sizing calculations will be provided with the stormwater plans for each phase of the PUD. Figure 1 shown below is an • example outlet control manhole. Page 9 of 12 ENOINEEEINO 9 0 West Winds—Stormwater Investigation March 5,2004 am am ww. ro rA eEMEE ME..E , Pain*.ww liio ,r.+rr':err alf '• .tMn. . 70 }F •r i' ,y;- �r l `^�.: "SAC V` 'j CLK%NW w' nllq�at or"a OT ma oft 4AXTV.la S7 IQ IL. • Figure 7—Example Flow Control Manhole Farmer's Canal Lateral and Section-Line Ditch As previously stated, two Farmer's Canal Laterals bisect the subject parcel from south to north. The most easterly ditch will be filled in and abandoned, per correspondence with Bob Davis, President of the Farmers Canal Ditch Company. The filling of this lateral is also addressed under a nationwide permit with the Army Corps. Of Engineers. The center irrigation lateral will be preserved to convey up-stream and on-site storm run-off through the property. Prior to flowing onto the property, the Farmer's Canal center lateral originates approximately three miles to the south of West Winds at a head-gate on the Main Farmers canal ditch and continues in a northerly direction flowing through Babcock Meadows,Westgate, Greenway and Harvest Creek Subdivisions, where it is referred to as Harmon Ditch. According to C&H Engineering's "Design Report for Harmon Ditch in Harvest Creek Subdivision", dated February 1999,the cumulative 100 year discharge, upon entering the subject parcel,is 86.53 cfs. Currently, there is an existing 42"RCP culvert that runs under West Oak Street, which has a design capacity of 83 cfs. This flowrate is inclusive of the cumulative runoff from all upstream developments. Culverts within the West Winds project have been sized to convey the initial flow of 86.53 cfs, in addition to the stormwater that will be released from the on-site detention ponds that outfall into the center irrigation lateral. To size the culverts, the detention pond release rates were added is in succession to the initial flow rate of 86.53 cfs. As the ditch passes under Breeze Lane, a release rate of 4.42 cfs was added for a combined flow of 90.95 cfs. Using a nomograph for Page 10 of 12 ENOINEEEINO West Winds—Stormwater Investigation � March 5 2004 g , • sizing the culverts, with a HW/D ratio of 1.5,it was determined that a 48" diameter CMP culvert was more than adequate to handle the required flow, as.shown in the calculations section of this report. Similarly, a 48" diameter CMP culvert is sufficient to handle the 95.09 cfs flowing under Tschache Lane and the 98.41 cfs flowing under road Trade Wind Lane. The design capacity of the 48" diameter CMP culvert is 118 cfs under the above-described conditions. Presently,the Section-Line Ditch flows alongside the proposed extension of Davis Lane in an unlined open channel. Upon construction of the Davis Lane extension,the ditch will either be piped the entire length of the extension, or the ditch will be left open with culverts placed at the three proposed road crossings, according to Bob Davis, President of the Farmers Canal Ditch Company. The City of Bozeman and Farmer's Canal Ditch Company have an informal agreement that 4-foot diameter equivalent culverts will be placed to convey water along the ditch, and that City personnel will assist in the maintenance of the culverts. Conveyance Facilities Stormwater runoff from this site will be conveyed to stormwater detention ponds by means of curb and gutter,catch basins and pipe. All conveyance facilities on the site have been sized to handle the 25-year, 2-hour storm event as required in the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. Table 6 summarizes the post-developed runoff rates and required pipe diameters. The storm sewer mains are shown graphically on Figure 6.3. • Storm sewer main "Ll", which serves basin`13-1,".will handle a post-developed runoff rate of 7.12 cfs. A nomograph was used to size the storm sewer main with a HW/D ratio of 2:1. It was determined that a 15" diameter Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP)has a design capacity of 8.50 cfs,which is sufficient to handle the calculated flow. Similarly, storm sewer mains "12", 413", "15", and"17" will be composed of 15" diameter RCP and have post-developed runoff rates of 7.75 cfs, 6.72 cfs, 6.23 cfs, and 6.58 cfs, respectively. Storm sewer mains "14" and"16"have post-developed runoff rates of 15.30 cfs and14.48 cfs, respectively. Again, a nomograph was used to size the storm sewer mains with a HW/D ratio of 2:1. It was determined that a 21" diameter RCP has a design capacity of 20 cfs under the above- described conditions. All calculations can be found in the Appendix of this report. Table 6-West Winds Subdivision Storm Sewer Capacity Calculations Storm Sewer Post-Developed Pipe Pipe Main Runoff Rate cfs Diameter in. Capacity cfs L1 7.12 15 8.50 L2 7.75 15 8.50 L3 6.72 15 8.50 L4 15.30 21 20.00 L5 6.23 15 8.50 L6 14.48 21 20.00 • L7 6.58 15 8.50 Page 11 of 12 ENGINEEIIIN W Win — rmwat r Investigation March 5 2004 West Winds Sto e g , • Standard square storm drain inlets will be used to capture the stormwater runoff at the points specified on Figure 6.3. These catch basins are in conformance with City of Bozeman design standards and include a 9" sump for ease of maintenance. Maintenance There are two basis types of storm drainage systems within West Winds;private and public. Private systems are defined as the mains,catchbasins and detention ponds on private property, typically within multi-family parcels. Public systems are mains,catchbasins and ponds serving publicly dedicated right-of-ways. Private sytems shall be maintained by the Homeowners association, public systems by the City of Bozeman. Due to sediment in the storm runoff and other variables,regular maintenance will be required by the Homeowners Association and City to maintain proper performance of the storage and drainage network. The following steps are minimum requirements for the maintenance of the storm facilities. A) Inspection Program—On an annual basis,the following elements of the storm water facilities shall be inspected for excessive sediment deposits: 1) Catch Basins 2) Curb Cut Openings 3) Storm Mains • 4) Detention Ponds B) Maintenance Program—The following maintenance measures shall be completed based on the inspection program: 1) Catch Basin, &Curb Cut Openings—excessive sediments shall be removed either manually (with a shovel) or with a vacuum truck and flushed. 2) Storm Mains—Mains shall be flushed if necessary. 3) Detention Ponds—A stake will be set six (6)inches above the original bottom of the basin. If sediment is over the stake,it must be removed and the basin must be revegetated according to the landscape plan. Conclusion This report establishes the projected stormwater flows, detention/retention requirements and conveyance recommendations for The West Winds Planned Community, and the Phase 1 Subdivision thereof. The basis for this report is the West Winds P.U.D. application of February 2004, which is preliminary. As the specific phases of the P.U.D are developed,it may be necessary to complete individual drainage analyses. Page 12 of 12 ENGINEEIIN� PEAK RUNOFF RATE AND DETENTION POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS Drainage Basin -B1 • The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method,and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 19.01 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C=0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S=2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 325 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec Tc= 0.95 min • Total T,= 23.95 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 1 = 1.16 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 4.42 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C=0.50 Residential -High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 30.59 9177 1326 7851 7 2.5862 24.58 10324 1856 8468 9 2.1964 20.88 11274 2387 8887 11 1.9278 18.32 12094 2917 9177 13 1.7295 16.44 12822 3448 9375 0 • • 15 1.5759 14.98 13481 3978 9503 17 1.4527 13.81 14084 4508 9576 19 1.3514,� 12.85 '= _ "_14644 5039 21 1.2663 12.04 15166 5569 9596 23 1.1936 11.35 15656 6100 9557 25 1.1306 10.75 16120 6630 9490 27 1.0755 10.22 16560 7160 9400 29 1.0266 9.76 16979 7691 9289 31 0.9831 9.34 17380 8221 9159 33 0.9439 8.97 17765 8752 9013 35 0.9085 8.64 18134 9282 8852 37 0.8763 8.33 18491 9812 8678 39 0.8468 8.05 18835 10343 8492 41 0.8197 7.79 19167 10873 8294 43 0.7947 7.55 19489 11404 8086 45 0.7716 7.33 19802 11934 7868 47 0.7501 7.13 20106 12464 7641 49 0.7300 6.94 20401 12995 7406 51 0.7113 6.76 20689 13525 7163 53 0:6937 6.59 20969 14056 6913 55 0.6772 6.44 21243 14586 6657 57 0.6617 6.29 21510 15116 6393 59 0.6470 6.15 21771 15647 6124 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 fUsec Design Release Rate = 4.42 cfs Minimum Area = 641 sf Since 9605 sf>641 sf, use 9605 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area= 9605 sf Volume= 9605 cf Length = 170 ft Width = 57 ft • Required Storage - B1 25000 • 20000 10 15000 ' U. V ,. Runoff Volume E ,� - - - Release Volume E o ,• — —Required Storage > . 10000 • ,, 5000 00 60 10 0 .0 0 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • • Drainage Basin -B2 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 17.99 Acre C = 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (TJ Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume:. L= 500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S=2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 440 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • Tc= 1.29 min Total Tc= 24.29 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.66 I = 1.15 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q = ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 4.14 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C 0.50 Residential-High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 28.95 8685 1242 7443 7 2.5862 23.26 9770 1739 8032 9 2.1964 19.76 10669 2236 8433 • 11 1.9278 17.34 11445 2732 8713 13 1.7295 15.56 12134 3229 8905 0 • 15 1.5759 14.17 12757 3726 9031 17 1.4527 13.07 13329 4223 9106 19 1.3514 12.16 13858 *: 4720, 9138 21 1.2663 11.39 14352 5216 9135 23 1.1936 10.74 14816 5713 9103 25 1.1306 10.17 15255 6210 9045 27 1.0755 9.67 15671 6707 8965 29 1.0266 9.23 16068 7204 8865 31 0.9831 8.84 16448 7700 8747 33 0.9439 8.49 16812 8197 8614 35 0.9085 8.17 17161 8694 8467 37 0.8763 7.88 17499 9191 8308 39 0.8468 7.62 17824 9688 8136 41 0.8197 7.37 18139 10184 7954 43 0.7947 7.15 18444 10681 7762 45 0.7716 6.94 18739 11178 7561 47 0.7501 6.75 19027 11675 7352 49 0.7300 6.57 19306 12172 7135 51 0.7113 6.40 19579 12668 6910 53 0.6937 6.24 19844 13165 6679 55 0.6772 6.09 20103 13662 6441 57 0.6617 5.95 20356 14159 6197 59 0.6470 5.82 20603 14656 5947 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate = 4.14 cfs Minimum Area = 601 sf Since 9138 sf>601 sf, use 9138 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area = 9138 sf Volume= 9138 cf Length = 166 ft Width = 55 ft Required Storage - B2 25000 20000 . LL v 15000 oo d , R Runoff Volume 10 N .0' - Release Volume o — —Required Storage Q /10000 00 00 '/ _ 5000 • ,' 00 , 01 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -B3 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 17.59 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L= 500 ft.--(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L = 800 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • Tc= 2.35 min Total Tc= 25.35 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the,10 year event, I =0.64Tc'.65 = 1.12 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 3.94 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential - High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 28.31 8492 1182 7310 7 2.5862 22.75 9553 1655 7898 9 2.1964 19.32 10432 2128 8304 • 11 1.9278 16.96 11191 2600 8590 13 1.7295 15.21 11864 3073 8791 • 15 1.5759 13.86 12474 3546 8928 17 1.4527 12.78 13032 4019 9014 19 1.3514 11.89 13550 4492 9058 21 . 1.2663, ° 11.14 14033 4964 ` G 9068 23 1.1936 10.50 14487 5437 9050 25 1.1306 9.94 14916 5910 9006 27 1.0755 9.46 15323 6383 8940 29 1.0266 9.03 15711 6856 8855 31 0.9831 8.65 16082 7328 8754 33 .0.9439 8.30 16438 7801 8637 35 0.9085 7.99 16780 8274 8506 37 0.8763 7.71 17109 8747 8363 39 0.8468 7.45 17428 9220 8208 41 0.8197 7.21 17735 9692 8043 43 0.7947 6.99 18033 10165 7868 45 0.7716 6.79 18323 10638 7685 47 0.7501 6.60 18604 11111 7493 49 0.7300 6.42 18877 11584 7293 51 0.7113 6.26 19143 12056 7087 53 0.6937 6.10 19403 12529 6873 55 0.6772 5.96 19656 13002 6654 57 0.6617 5.82 19903 13475 6428 59 0.6470 5.69 20145 13948 6197 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate = 3.94 cfs Minimum Area = 571 sf Since 9068 sf> 571 sf, use 9068 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area = 9068 sf Volume = 9068 cf Length = 165 ft Width = 55 ft • • Required Storage - B3 25000 20000 . i U- v 15000 m 0 Runoff Volume - - - Release Volume N v 0,go so do — —Required Storage 10000 , , ,' 5000 00 so 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -B4 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 14.67 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S=2.00%u, calculate channel flow L= 690 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec TC= 2.02 min • Total Tc= 25.02 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 I = 1.13 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 3.32 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential-High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (co (cf) 5 3.2185 23.61 7082 996 6086 7 2.5862 18.97 7967 1394 6573 9 2.1964 16.11 8700 1793 6907 • 11 1.9278 14.14 9333 2191 7142 13 1.7295 12.69 9895 2590 7305 • 15 1.5759 11.56 10403 2988 7415 17 1.4527 10.66 10869 3386 7483 19 1.3514 9.91 11300 3785 7516 11703 4183 7520 23 1.1936 8.75 12082� 4582 7500 25 1.1306 8.29 12440 4980 7460 27 1.0755 7.89 12779 5378 7401 29 1.0266 7.53 13103 5777 7326 31 0.9831 7.21 13412 6175 7237 33 0.9439 6.92 13709 6574 7136 35 0.9085 6.66 13994 6972 7022 37 0.8763 6.43 14269 7370 6899 39 0.8468 6.21 14535 7769 6766 41 0.8197 6.01 14791 8167 6624 43 0.7947 5.83 15040 8566 6474 45 0.7716 5.66 15281 8964 6317 47 0.7501 5.50 15515 9362 6153 49 0.7300 5.35 15743 9761 5983 51 0.7113 5.22 15965 10159 5806 53 0.6937 5.09 16182 10558 5624 55 0.6772 4.97 16393 10956 5437 57 0.6617 4.85 16599 11354 5245 59 0.6470 4.75 16801 11753 5048 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate = 3.32 cfs Minimum Area= 480 sf Since 7520 sf>480 sf, use 7520 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area = 7520 sf Volume= 7520 cf Length= 150 ft Width= 50 ft Required Storage - B4 18000 16000 14000 12000 LL -- 0 • v - 10000 Runoff Volume o 0.10 N - - - Release Volume 00 so d 8000 — —Required Storage cr 10 / •` � - ' - 6000 0, - - '4000 - . - i - so '2000 00 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -B5 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 41.71 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1, Tr= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 1500 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec Tc= 4.40 min • Total T = 27.40 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 = 1.07 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q = ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 8.89 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential - High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 67.12 20136 2667 17469 7 2.5862 53.94 22653 3734 18919 9 2.1964 45.81 24736 4801 19935 11 1.9278 40.21 26535 5867 20668 • 13 1.7295 36.07 28133 6934 21199 • 15 1.5759 32.86 29578 8001 21577 17 1.4527 30.30 30903 9068 21835 19 1.3514 28.18 32129 10135 21995 21 1.2663 26.41 33275 11201 22073 1.1.936=:;. 24.89 z 34351 ;�` 92268 22083 25 1.1306 23.58 35369 13335 22034 27 1.0755 22.43 36334 14402 21933 29 1.0266 21.41 37255 15469 21786 31 0.9831 20.50 38134 16535 21599 33 0.9439 19.69 38978 17602 21376 35 0.9085 18.95 39789 18669 21120 37 0.8763 18.27 40570 19736 20835 39 0.8468 17.66 41325 20803 20522 41 0.8197 17.10 42055 21869 20185 43 0.7947 16.57 42762 22936 19825 45 0.7716 16.09 43447 24003 19444 47 0.7501 15.64 44114 25070 19044 49 0.7300 15.23 44762 26137 18625 51 0.7113 14.83 45393 27203 18190 53 0.6937 14.47 46008 28270 17738 55 0.6772 14.12 46609 29337 17272 57 0.6617 13.80 47195 30404 16791 59 0.6470 13.49 47768 31471 16297 61 0.6332 13.20 48329 32537 15791 63 0.6200 12.93 48877 33604 15273 • 65 0.6076 12.67 '-49415 34671 14744 67 0.5957 12.42 '49942 35738 14204 69 0.5844 12.19 ,50459 36805 13654 71 0.5737 11.96 50966 37871 13095 73 0.5634 11.75 51464 38938 12526 75 0.5536 11.55 51953 40005 11948 77 0.5442 11.35 52434 41072 11362 Calculate Minimum Area Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles=0.0069 fUsec Design Release Rate = 8.89 cfs Minimum Area = 1288 sf Since 20,083 sf> 1288 sf, use.20,083 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area = 22083 sf Volume = 22083 cf • Length= 257 ft Width= 86 ft Required Storage - B5 60000 50000 • 40000 R / / / Runoff Volume N / 30000 / - - - Release Volume Required Storage / a / m / 20000 0000 / / / 00 / / 10000 / / / / / 0 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -136-A . The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 8.87 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1, T�= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S =2.00%,calculate channel flow L = 360 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • Tc= 1.06 min Total Tc= 24.06 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 1 = 1.16 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 2.06 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential-High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 14.27 4282 618 3664 7 2.5862 11.47 4817 865 3952 9 2.1964 9.74 5260 1112 4148 11 1.9278 8.55 5643 1360 4283 13 1.7295 7.67 5983 1607 4376 • • • 15 1.5759 6.99 6290 1854 4436 17 1.4527 6.44 6572 2101 4471 19 1.3514 5.99 6833 2348 4484 5 21 1.2663 5.62 7076 2596 4481 23 1.1936 5.29 7305 2843 4462 25 1.1306 5.01 7521 3090 4431 27 1.0755 4.77 7727 3337 4390 29 1.0266 4.55 7923 3584 4338 31 0.9831 4.36 8110 . 3832 4278 33 0.9439 4.19 8289 4079 4210 35 0.9085 4.03 8461 4326 4135 37 0.8763 3.89 8628 4573 4054 39 0.8468 3.76 8788 4820 3968 41 0.8197 3.64 8943 5068 3876 43 0.7947 3.52 9094 5315 3779 45 0.7716 3.42 9239 5562 3677 47 0.7501 3.33 9381 5809 3572 49 0.7300 3.24 9519 6056 3463 51 0.7113 3.15 9653 6304 3350 53 0.6937 3.08 9784 6551 3233 55 0.6772 3.00 9912 6798 3114 57 0.6617 2.93 10036 7045 2991 59 0.6470 2.87 10158 7292 2866 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 fUsec Design Release Rate = 2.06 cfs Minimum Area = 298 sf Since 4484 sf>298 sf, use 4484 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area = 4484 sf Volume= 4484 cf Length= 116 ft Width = 39 ft • Required Storage - B6-A 12000 10000 8000 U d ,, Runoff Volume �° 6000 - - - Release Volume — —Required Storage L / // 4000 // • 2000 � / 0 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -136-B The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 6.4 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C=0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft.--(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L = 240 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • Tc= 0.70 min Total Tc= 23.70 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.55 1 = 1.17 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 1.50 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential - High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (co (cf) 5 3.2185 10.30 3090 450 2640 7 2.5862 8.28 3476 630 2846 9 2.1964 7.03 3795 810 2985 • 11 1.9278 6.17 4072 990 3082 13 1.7295 5.53 4317 1170 3147 • 15 1.5759 5.04 4538 1350 3188 17 1.4527 4.65 4742 1530 3212 1.9 ' 1.3514 µ.r- 4.32 4930-_ j -1710 ``3220 21 1.2663 4.05 5106 1890 3216 23 1.1936 3.82 5271 2070 3201 25 1.1306 3.62 5427 2250 3177 27 1.0755 3.44 5575 2430 3145 29 1.0266 3.29 5716 2610 3106 31 0.9831 3.15 5851 2790 3061 33 0.9439 3.02 5981 2970 3011 35 0.9085 2.91 6105 3150 2955 37 0.8763 2.80 6225 3330 2895 39 0.8468 2.71 6341 3510 2831 41 0.8197 2.62 6453 3690 2763 43 0.7947 2.54 6561 3870 2691 45 0.7716 2.47 6667 4050 2617 47 0.7501 2.40 6769 4230 2539 49 0.7300 2.34 6868 •4410 2458 51 0.7113 2.28 6965 4590 2375 53 0.6937 2.22 7060 4770 2290 55 0.6772 2.17 7152 4950- 2202 57 0.6617 2.12 7242 5130 2112 59 0.6470 2.07 7330 5310 2020 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate= 1.50 cfs Minimum Area = 217 sf Since 3320 sf>217 sf, use 3220 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area= 3220 sf Volume= 3220 cf Length = 98 ft Width= 33 ft • Required Storage - B6-B 8000 7000 6000 . ' U.- 5000 ' .0lo m ccRunoff Volume y4000 Release Volume — —Required Storage 00 Op 00 2000 , . ' � / / , � � 1000 0 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -136-C The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 11.25 Acre C = 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L= 500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1, Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S=2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 500 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • Tc= 1.47 min Total Tc= 24.47 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 = 1.15 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 2.58 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential- High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 18.10 5431 774 4657 7 2.5862 14.55 6110 1084 5026 • 9 2.1964 12.36 6672 1393 5279 11 1.9278 10.84 7157 1703 5454 13 1.7295 9.73 7588 2012 5576 15 1.5759 8.86 7978 2322 5656 17 1.4527 8.17 8335 _ 2632 5703 19 1`.3514' 7.60� � _86_66 � 2941 '�� . _ _ _.. .�...,__..__ 5725 21 1.2663 7.12 8975 3251 5724 23 1.1936 6.71 9265 3560 5705 25 1.1306 6.36 9540 3870 5670 27 1.0755 6.05 9800 4180 5620 29 1.0266 5.77 10048 4489 5559 31 0.9831 5.53 10286 4799 5487 33 0.9439 5.31 10513 5108 5405 35 0.9085 5.11 10732 5418 5314 37 0.8763 4.93 10943 5728 5215 39 0.8468 4.76 11146 6037 5109 41 0.8197 4.61 11343 6347 4996 43 0.7947 4.47 11534 6656 4877 45 0.7716 4.34 11719 6966 4753 47 0.7501 4.22 11898 7276 4623 49 0.7300 4.11 12073 7585 4488 51 0.7113 4.00 12243 7895 4349 53 0.6937 3.90 12409 8204 4205 55 0.6772 3.81 12571 8514 4057 57 0.6617 3.72 12729 8824 3906 59 0.6470 3.64 12884 9133 3751 • Calculate Minimum Area Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate = 2.58 cfs Minimum Area = 374 sf Since 5725 sf>374 sf, use 5725 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area = 5725 sf Volume= 5725 cf Length = 131 ft Width = 44 ft • Required Storage - B6-C 14000 12000 10000 u_ . U , • m 8000 ' do E oo o Runoff Volume 2 '/ o - - • - Release Volume m Required Storage L 6000 rr 4000 •, •200000 0 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -B6-D The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 11.49 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft. -- (300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n = 0.035, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 560 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • Tc= 1.64 min Total T,= 24.64 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64TC1.61 1 = 1.14 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q = ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 2.62 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential - High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (ft- 5 3.2185 18.49 5547 786 4761 7 2.5862 14.86 6240 1100 5140 9 2.1964 12.62 6814 1415 5399 • 11 1.9278 11.08 7310 1729 5581 13 1.7295 9.94 7750 2044 5706 i 0 • 15 1.5759 9.05 8148 2358 5790 17 1.4527 8.35 8513 2672 5840 19 1.3514 7.76 8851 2987 5864 21 1.2663 7.27 4' - 9166 3301 :. , = ,586.5 23 1.1936 6.86 9463 3616 5847 25 1.1306 6.50 9743 3930 5813 27 1.0755 6.18 10009 4244 5765 29 1.0266 5.90 10263 4559 5704 31 0.9831 5.65 10505 4873 5632 33 0.9439 5.42 10737 5188 5550 35 0.9085 5.22 10961 5502 5459 37 0.8763 5.03 11176 5816 5360 39 0.8468 4.86 11384 6131 5253 41 0.8197 4.71 11585 6445 5140 43 0.7947 4.57 11780 6760 5020 45 0.7716 4.43 11969 7074 4895 47 0.7501 4.31 12152 7388 4764 49 0.7300 4.19 12331 7703 4628 51 0.7113 4.09 12505 8017 4487 53 0.6937 3.99 12674 8332 4342 55 0.6772 3.89 12839 8646 4193 57 0.6617 3.80 13001 8960 4041 59 0.6470 3.72 13159 9275 3884 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate = 2.62 cfs Minimum Area = 380 sf Since 5865 sf>380 sf, use 5865 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area= 5865 sf Volume= 5865 cf Length= 133 ft Width= 44 ft • • Required Storage - B6-D 14000 12000 • 10000 10 - U ' .0 8000 so so Io Runoff Volume 10 oo U � . Release Volume —Required Storage 6000 4000 10 2000 0 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -OS-1 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 3.57 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (T j Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L= 500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc_ 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S =2.00%,calculate channel flow L= 560 ft R= 0.02 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec Tc= 1.64 min • Total Tc= 10.00 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 1 = 2.05 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 1.46 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential- High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 5.74 1723 438 1285 7 2.5862 4.62 _ 1939 613 1326 _ -- 9 = --- 2.1964 3.92 - - ----- 2117 _—__. 788 -_ 1329 • 11 1.9278 3.44 2271 964 1308 13 1.7295 3.09 2408 1139 1269 • 15 1.5759 2.81 2532 1314 1218 17 1.4527 2.59 2645 1489 1156 19 1.3514 2.41 2750 1664 1086 21 1.2663 2.26 2848 1840 1008 23 1.1936 2.13 2940 2015 925 25 1.1306 2.02 3027 2190 837 27 1.0755 1.92 3110 2365 745 29 1.0266 1.83 3189 2540 648 31 0.9831 1.75 3264 2716 548 33 0.9439 1.68 . 3336 2891 445 35 0.9085 1.62 3406 3066 340 37 0.8763 1.56 3472 3241 231 39 0.8468 1.51 3537 3416 121 41 0.8197 1.46 3599 3592 8 43 0.7947 1.42 3660 3767 -107 45 0.7716 1.38 3719 3942 -223 47 0.7501 1.34 3776 4117 -341 49 0.7300 1.30 3831 4292 -461 51 0.7113 1.27 3885 4468 -582 53 0.6937 1.24 3938 4643 -705 55 0.6772 1.21 3989 4818 -829 57 0.6617 1.18 4039 4993 -954 59 0.6470 1.15 4089 5168 -1080 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate= 1.46 cfs Minimum Area = 212 sf Since 1329 sf>380 sf, use 1329 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area= 1329 sf Volume= 1329 cf Length = 63 ft Width = 21 ft Required Storage - OS-1 6000 5000 - — -- - -------- 00 Op 00 . 4000 ----.__.......................................------- --- --.............._........._-00! --.... 40 LL 10 . t� � . Runoff Volume j3000 - — -- ...._.._.. �! --..-_..._......_.. �.. .. - - - Release Volume c ' ' — —Required Storage m cr 10 m • 2000 ......._............. __..._.... ------------ -- -- Op 00 . 4 , 10 00 Tir.rv► ra r.Ha( 1000 - -----0, 0 � 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) 0 • Drainage Basin -OS-2 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 2.69 Acre C = 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (TJ V Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 560 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • TC= 1.64 min Total Tc= 10.00 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 = 2.05 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 1.10 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential - High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 4.33 1299 330 969 7 2.5862 3.48 1461 462 999 2:9 1964 2.95 - 1595 w� .594 11 1.9278 2.59 1711 726 985 13 1.7295 2.33 1814 858 956 • 15 1.5759 2.12 1908 990 918 17 1.4527 1.95 1993 1122 871 19 1.3514 1.82 2072 1254 818 21 1.2663 1.70 2146 1386 760 23 1.1936 1.61 2215 1518 697 25 1.1306 1.52 2281 1650 631 27 1.0755 1.45 2343 1782 561 29 1.0266 1.38 2403 1914 489 31 0.9831 1.32 2459 2046 413 33 0.9439 1.27 2514 2178 336 35 0.9085 1.22 2566 2310 256 37 .0.8763 1.18 2617 2442 175 39 0.8468 1.14 2665 2574 91 41 0.8197 1.10 2712 2706 6 43 0.7947 1.07 2758 2838 -80 45 0.7716 1.04 2802 2970 -168 47 0.7501 1.01 2845 3102 -257 49 0.7300 0.98 2887 3234 -347 51 0.7113 0.96 2928 3366 -438 53 0.6937 0.93 2967 3498 -531 55 0.6772 0.91 3006 3630 -624 57 0.6617 0.89 3044 3762 -718 59 0.6470 0.87 3081 3894 -813 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate= 1.10 cfs Minimum Area = 160 sf Since 1001 sf> 160 sf, use 1001 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1 ft Surface Area= 1001 sf Volume= 1001 cf Length= 55 ft Width = 18 ft • • • Required Storage o S ? 4500 4000 — — -- , 3500 _ ON �- 00 3000 U- ' U ' i m � E 2500 - - -- . Runoff Volume 0 ' - Release Volume . ' — —Required Storage 2000 --- - - - a 00 d ' , ' 1500 , . ' 500 0 - 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -OS-3 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 2.98 Acre C= 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (T j Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L= 500 ft. --(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1, Tc= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 560 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec • Tc= 1.64 min Total Tc=1 10.00 Imin Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 1 = 2.05 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 1.22 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential- High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 4.80 1439 366 1073 7 2.5862 3.85 1618 512 1106 _ _---T _ __-- -, V 9 2.1964 3.27 1767 659 1108 • 11 - 1.9278 ----2.87 1896 — __- 805 , - 1091-_- 13 1.7295 2.58 2010 952 1058 ! !. • 15 1.5759 2.35 2113 1098 1015 17 1.4527 2.16 2208 1244 963 19 1.3514 2.01 2296 1391 905 21 1.2663 1.89 2377 1537 840 23 1.1936 1.78 2454 1684 771 25 1.1306 1.68 2527 1830 697 27 1.0755 1.60 2596 1976 620 29 1.0266 1.53 2662 2123 539 31 0.9831 1.46 2725 2269 . 455 33 0.9439 1.41 2785 2416 369 35 0.9085 1.35 2843 2562 281 37 0.8763 1.31 2899 2708 190 39 0.8468 1.26 2952 2855 98 41 0.8197 1.22 3005 3001 3 43 0.7947 1.18 3055 3148 -92 45 0.7716 1.15 3104 3294 -190 47 0.7501 1.12 3152 3440 -289 49 0.7300 1.09 3198 3587 -389 51 0.7113 1.06 3243 3733 -490 53 0.6937 1.03 3287 3880 -593 55 0.6772 1.01 3330 4026 -696 57 0.6617 0.99 3372 4172 -801 59 0.6470 0.96 3413 4319 -906 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles=0.0069 ft/sec Design Release Rate = 1.22 cfs Minimum Area= 177 sf Since 1108 sf> 177 sf, use 1108 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = -1 ft Surface Area= 1108 sf Volume= 1108 cf Length= 58 ft Width= 19 ft • 0 • Required Storage -.OS-3 5000 4500 --- 4000 -- -- - , r . r r r 3500 __ __ �.� _- _--- r -- _ r r 00 LL r v 3000 - --- G� r 0 , r Runoff Volume 2500 - -- - + -- - - Release Volume d -- —Required Storage L � 2000 r — d r r r , r 1500 -- .-' --— r ol 1000 500 r r 1 0 - 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Drainage Basin -OS-4 The following calculations were used to determine the minimum required storage volume for storm water runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the retention facilities were sized based on a 10-year 2-hour storm event. Area= 2.99 Acre C = 0.2 Open Land Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C=0.20 Open Land Conditions Assume: L=500 ft.--(300 ft-sheet flow/200 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,T,= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.035, S=2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 560 ft R= 0.92 ft v= 5.68 ft/sec TC= 1.64 min • Total T,= 10.00 min Calculate Pre-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 10 year event, I =0.64Tc-0.65 I = 2.05 in/hr Calculate Pre-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 1.23 cfs Calculate Developed Minimum Required Volume Storage C =0.50 Residential.-High Density Developed Developed Pre-developed Storm Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Runoff Volume Release Volume Required Storage (Minutes) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5 3.2185 4.81 1443 369 1074 7 2.5862 3.87 1624 517 1107 �T9 2.1964 3.28 1773 664 1109 � • 11 1.9278 2.88 1902 812 1090 13 1.7295 2.59 2017 959 1057 • 15 1.5759 2.36 2120 1107 1013 17 1.4527 2.17 2215 1255 961 19 1.3514 2.02 2303 1402 901 21 1.2663 1.89 2385 1550 836 23 1.1936 1.78 2462 1697 765 25 1.1306 1.69 2535 1845 690 27 1.0755 1.61 2605 1993 612 29 1.0266 1.53 2671 2140 530 31 0.9831 1.47 2734 2288 446 33 0.9439 1.41 2794 2435 359 35 0.9085 1.36 2852 .2583 269 37 0.8763 1.31 2908 2731 178 39 0.8468 1:27 2962 2878 84 41 0.8197 1.23 3015 3026 -11 43 0.7947 1.19 3065 3173 -108 45 0.7716 1.15 3115 3321 -206 47 0.7501 1.12 3162 3469 -306 49 0.7300 1.09 3209 3616 -407 51 0.7113 1.06 3254 3764 -510 53 0.6937 1.04 3298 3911 -613 55 0.6772 1.01 3341 4059 -718 57 0.6617 0.99 3383 4207 -823 59 0.6470 0.97 3424 4354 -930 Calculate Minimum Area • Assume: 1. Non-flocculant particles 2. Settling velocity of 40 micron particles =0.0069 fUsec Design Release Rate= 1.23 cfs Minimum Area = 178 sf Since 1109 sf> 178 sf, use 1109 sf Basin Sizing Water Depth = 1, ft Surface Area = 1109'.- sf Volume= 1109 cf Length = 58 ft Width = 19 ft Required Storage - OS-4 5000 4500 , 4000 --- — - --- • 10 3500 v 3000 — m ' ' Runoff Volume 2500 - -- -- ---- -• - -___— _ ___ _ - - Release Volume • — —Required Storage a 2000 d ' . ' 1500 Op lo 1000 oo r•� Orr you j 0 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Storm Duration (Min.) • Detention Pond Sizing The following tables were used to determine the detention pond volumes. The volumes were calculated by using the prismoidal method and are based on the detention pond configuration shown in Fig 6.3a. All elevations are assumed. DETENTION POND 1 POND ELEV AREA VOLUME JVOLUME, ,, METHOD DESIG ft2 ft' ft3 96 0 0 0 prismoidal 97 9 3.01 3.01 O 98 1946 695.79 698.80 Z Z 99 4404 3,092.31 3,791.11 W a 100 7027 5,664.62 9,455.73 w 0 DETENTION POND 2 POND ELEV AREA VOLUME VOLUMESu METHOD DESIG fe fe ft3 96 0 0 0 prismoidal 97 9 ._ 3.01 3.01 O_ 98 571 217.12 220.13 H o 99 - 1388 949.56 1,169.68 Wz a 100 2375 1,859.66 3,029.34 • w 0 DETENTION POND 3 POND ELEV I AREA I VOLUME VOLUMES,, METHOD DESIG (ft) ft3 ft' 95 0 0 0 96 3892 1,297.31 1,297.31 prismoidal z 97 5370 4,611.29 5,908.60 0_ 98 7012 6,173.00 12,081.59 Z 0 99 8818 7,897.77 19,979.36 Wz a 100 10785 9,784.91 29,764.28 w 0 DETENTION POND 4 POND ELEV AREA VOLUME VOLUME.,, METHOD . DESIG (fe) (ft' ft 95 0 0 0 96 2604 868.08 '868.08 prismoidal z 97 4496 3,507.24 4,375.32 0_ 98 6559 5,495.08 9,870.40 Z 0 99 8791 71647.71 17,518.11 HZ a 100 11190 9,966.26 27,484.37 w • DETENTION POND 5 POND ELEV I AREA VOLUME IVOLUME.,U.,,l METHOD DESIG ft2 ft' ft' 96 0 0 0 prismoidal Z 97 9 3.01 3.01 O 0 98 3553 1,247.19 1,250.20 Z Z 99 8515 5,856.44 7,106.65 ui w a 100 13648 10,980.96 18,087.61 o DETENTION POND 6 POND ELEV AREA VOLUME VOLUMES„m I METHOD DESIG ft2 fe ; ft' 95 0 0 0 96 4209 1,403.16 1,403.16 prismoidal_, Z 97 6035 5,094.89 6,498.05 O 98 8555 7,258.60 13,756.64 61 Z Z 99 11553 10,016.49 23,773.13 wa 100 14718 13,103.40 36,876.53 w 0 DETENTION POND 7 • POND ELEV AREA VOLUME IVOLUME.. METHOD DESIG ft2 ft' ft' 95 0 0 0 96 15883 5,294.29 5,294.29 prismoidal Z 97 20164 17,980.80 23,275.09 O 98 24619 22,354.16 45,629.25 Z Z 99 29240 26,896.19 72,525.44 w a 100 34027 31,603.20 104,128.64 w 0 DETENTION POND 8 POND ELEV I AREA I VOLUME IVOLUMEg„m METHOD DESIG ftZ fe fe 95 0 0 0 96 12718 4,239.33 4,239.33 prismoidal Z 97 17792 15,184.31 19,423,64 O 98 23037 20,358.27 39,781.90 Z Z 99 28445 25,693.62 65,475.52 w a 100 34017 31,189.45 96,664.97 w 0 • CONVEYANCE FACILITY CALCULATIONS • Storm Drainage Main L1 The following calculations were used to size the conveyance facilities for stormwater runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the conveyance facilities were sized based on a 25-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 19.09 Acre C = 0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential . Calculate Time of Concentration(Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C=0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Assume: L=900 ft. --(250 ft sheet flow/650 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 35 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.013, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 835 ft • R= 0.31 ft v= 7.40 ft/sec T�= 1.88 min Total TC= 36.88 min Calculate Post-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 25 year event, I =0.78Tc'-14 1 = 1.07 in/hr Calculate Post-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q = ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 7.12 cfs • Storm Drainage Main L2 The following calculations were used to size the conveyance facilities for stormwater runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the conveyance facilities were sized based on a 25-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 17.99 Acre C= 0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Assume: L=530 ft. --(250 ft sheet flow/280 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 27 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.013, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 1075 ft • R= 0.31 ft v= 7.40 ft/sec Tc= 2.42 min Total Tc= 29.42 min Calculate Post-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 25 year event, I =0.78Tc-0.64 1 = 1.23 in/hr Calculate Post-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q = ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 7.75 cfs • Storm Drainage Main L3 The following calculations were used to size the conveyance facilities for stormwater runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the conveyance facilities were sized based on a 25-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 17.58 Acre C = 0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C =0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Assume: L=850 ft. —(300 ft sheet flow/550 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc = 34 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.013, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L = 660 ft • R= 0.31 ft v= 7.40 ft/sec Tc= 1.49 min Total Tc= 35.49 min Calculate Post-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 25 year event, I =0.78Tc-0.64 1 = 1.09 in/hr Calculate Post-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q = ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 6.72 cfs • Storm Drainage Main L4 The following calculations were used to size the conveyance facilities for stormwater runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method,and the conveyance facilities were sized based on a 25-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 38.02 Acre C= 0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C=0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Assume: L=650 ft. --(300 ft sheet flow/350 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1, Tc= 31 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.013, S=2.00%,calculate channel flow L = 770 ft • R= 0.31 ft v= 7.40 ft/sec Tc= 1.73 min Total Tc= 32.73 min Calculate Post-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 25 year event, I =0.78Tc'.14 1 = 1.15 in/hr Calculate Post-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q= 15.30 cfs • 0 Storm Drainage Main L5 The following calculations were used to size the conveyance facilities for stormwater runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the conveyance facilities were sized based on a 25-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 13.9 Acre C= 0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential :t Calculate Time of Concentration(Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C=0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Assume: L=460 ft. —(300 ft sheet flow/160 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1,Tc= 25 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.013, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 1180 ft • R= ft.31 7 v= .40 ft/sec Tc= 2.66 min Total TC= 27.66 min Calculate Post-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 25 year event, I =0.78Tc'.14 I = 1.28 in/hr Calculate Post-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 6.23 cfs • i • • Storm Drainage Main L6 The following calculations were used to size the conveyance facilities for stormwater runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the conveyance facilities were sized based on a 25-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 13.9 Acre C= 0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Calculate Time of Concentration (Tj Existing Conditions: S=2.00% C=0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Assume: L=600 ft. —(300 ft sheet flow/300 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1, Tc= 29 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.013, S =2.00%,calculate channel flow L= 1150 ft • R = 0.31 ft v= 7.40 ft/sec Tc= 2.59 min Total Tc= 31.59 min Calculate Post-developed Storm Intensity at Tc From Figure 1-3, using the 25 year event, I =0.78TC-0.64 1 = 1.18 in/hr Calculate Post-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q= ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 5.72 cfs + 8.76 cfs from release of Basin B6A-B61) 14.48 cfs • i3 • Storm Drainage Main L7 The following calculations were used to size the conveyance facilities for stormwater runoff. The volumes were calculated using the Rational Method, and the conveyance facilities were sized based on a 25-year 2-hour storm event. Area = 13.9 Acre C = 0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Calculate Time of Concentration(Tj Existing Conditions: S =2.00% C=0.35 Low to Medium Density Residential Assume: L=400 ft. —(150 ft sheet flow/250 ft shallow flow) From Figure 1-1, T�= 23 min. (overland flow) Using Mannings Equation, n =0.013, S =2.00%, calculate channel flow L= 1070 ft • R= 0.31 ft v= 7.40 ft/sec Tc= 2.41 min Total Tc = 25.41 min Calculate Post-developed Storm Intensity at T, From Figure 1-3, using the 25 year event, I =0.78Tc'.14 1 = 1.35 in/hr Calculate Post-developed Peak Runoff Rate Q = ciA, using the above parameters. Q = 6.58 cfs IS" STEEL DRAINAGE AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS f. 3. HYDRAULICS Improved Inlets Culvert capacity may be increased through the use of special inlet designs. " The Federal Highway Administration has developed extensive data19.20 t80 REHM g y P onthese. While these designs increase the flow, their use has not been asexpected.The increased costs of the special treatments is apparently respon- Y ' 156 A s sible. f" ``` 144 � F . �.�,` BEVELLED BIND .7 132 3000 MINIMDM �00• 3.6 180- 10,000r �'..;��'' 120 .8,000 LOSS COEFFICIENT K z000 3.0 :r;; ';', -169 a !•`.i: _ FOR VARIOUS ENTRANCE 108 s,000 (2) -I c - 156' TYPES 6• a 5,OOp Ds�METEB•o 144 (3) 96 1000 I 4.000 HW ENTRANCE ` 2 0,� U SCALE TYPE COEFFICIENT 5' 6. 800 132 W. 3,000 6. .1 600 W �11) Headwall,sq,edge:or End 0.5 84 F; 120 ` Section conforming so fill 5. 500 0 2,000 slops 4. 400 Q 108 a IT) Mitered to conform to slope 0.7 72 G 13) Projecting from fill 0.9 3. 4. _- 300 - 96 1.000 3. ci 2_ z 00 ' 1=- N Ks 1 B00 To use scale 12)or 13)project 3. 60 i W hart:onroll to scale(1).then st,. !- o u 84 600 use straighs inclined line Through 2• L In500 D and Q stoles,or reverse as _ '+ 54 400 illustrated. W 100 Uj 72 2. .2. ' 46 8o 1.0 3 o 300 \ 1.5 __$ - u, 60 W � rn 200 = O 42 50 = 60 1.5 1.5 ¢ Or 0.9 - .0 W Q 40 at 54 E ` '.i' a 36 syis 30 100 o .il... c 0.8 80 O .. 33 _ O o c o 6042 .0 LE - _? w _ :y 0.7 as 40 EXAMPLE O I.0 27 10 of 36 30 i .(0)=48in.e 4 f t a`t 0.9 O 33 __- 0= 70f13/sec_ �3 0.9 "_1 24 6 . 30 Scale MW Hyy = 0.8 0.8 5 D 0.8 t; 21 4 0/ ' (1) 1.0 4.0/t an 27 10 (2) 1.0 4.6 3 u (3) 1.1 4.4 0.7 0.7 'ly ' rn 24 a i8 2 0.52 6 0.7 0 5 Z7 4 0.6 15 0.6 1.0 3 le 0.6 HEADWATER DEPTH 2 i 12 CIRCULAR PIPE CULV' WITH BEVELLED RII 15 1.0 - 0.5 0.5 INLET CONTROL HEADWATER DEPTH FOR 12 CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE CULVERTS I �w WITH INLET CONTROL ,r /rP rr l-a�'o = /.D Figure 3.28 Inlet contra/ nomograph for c12 -u corrugated steel Poow�r Figure 3.29 inlet control.Headwater depth for circular pipe culverts with bevele( 9g pipe culverts.13 The manufacturers recommend keeping HW/D to a maximum of 1.5 and preferably to no more than 1.0 for diameters greater than 4 to 5 feet. 3. flYDRAULICS STEEL DRAINAGE AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS Improved Inlets Culvert capacity may be increased through the use of special inlet designs. teo The Federal Highway Administration has developed extensive datal9,20 on 168 these. While these designs increase the flow, their use has not been as t�xpected.The increased costs of the special treatments is apparently respon- A Bible. 144 BEVELLED 1 132 0 3000 .1 3.6 10,000 too- 120 2000 3.0 -- 168 -8,000 LOSS COEFFICIENT K,� FOR VARIOUS ENTRANCE (2) 108 156 6.000 .41 . 14---�� 5,00P TYPES 6. DIAWFIER-D 1000 . 144 H ENTRANCE (3) .13. 96 41000 SCALE T COEFFICIENT 5.. 6. Boo .0 ; .. 132 7. 3.000 TYPE 5. 6. Head-Ill.,q. d 0.5 84 Soo 120 w Section In.,.li'l • 500 1 -6 2.000 top. tape 5. (2) Mitered to conform to s 0.7 7 4. 400 108 -0 .5 TZ (3) Praiecting from ;11 0.9 3. 4. 300 96 1,000 3. 200 Soo 3. 6 T.use.-I.(2)a,(3)project 60 84 600 horizontally to scale 111.then use straight inclined line through 2. 500 D and 0 scale%,or reverse as cc 54 4 illustrated. n 100 00 W 72 2. -.2. -j 4 -Z 80 300 1.0 01 60 200 0 0 50 60 3=: cc 42 CX 0.9 1.5 1.5 11 4 40 C) E -54 W U E_ rn 30 L 100 E .0.8 so 33 o s-o 1-42 L-0 :j.sl-0 0.7- 7 50 -40 EXAMPLE 1.0 27 10 30 Diam.(D)a 46in. 4 It 36 Q= 7CfI3/SeC 0.9 24 6 ------------ - 33 0 . - 0.8 0.8 - 5 0.( -30 Scale H W HW M. 21 4 0 - - F -0.8 (7) 1.0 4.01`1 27 10 (2) 1.0 4.0 5 (3) 1.1 4.4 0.7 -0.7 0 a, Y. 0.! tr 24 6 0.7 2 O 5 21 4 1 .15 -0.6 0.6 1.0 0 3 -0 -0.6 C .2 - 18 HEADWATER DEPTH 2 CIRCULAR PIPE CUL: 12 15 WITH BEVELLED F 1.0 -0.5 L 0.5 INLET cONTRO 2'0 Se,"*" lope '2' ",red 'o'm"or" 0. to 800 To or(.1 "nd 0'5,f*p' 0,7 09 project le, ,.,he .6 C ENTRANCE T' SCALE y .'6__" T P --d ,q . Sec.,__� ..... lope '..re . ... from d .a through reverse-' ill .....ed- _,is h y c_ 6.. straight inclined on d 0. 3 00.0 0 C HEADWATER DEPTH FOR 12 CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE CULVERTS i 1�e WITH INLET CONTROL 12 avo"C( poow'*"'; Figure 3.29 inlet control.Headwater depth for circular pipe culverts with beve 13 Figure 3.28 Inlet control nomograph for corrugated steel pipe culverts. The manufacturers recommend keeping HIMID to a maximum of 1.5 and preferably to no more than 1.0.for diameters greater than 4 to 5 feet. �— o Z2. �C� "P1 i WETLANDS DELINIATION • REPORT o.o • • WEST WINDS COMITY WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Quest West, LLC Bozeman, Montana .i� r w f Prepared for: Prepared by: Quest West,LLC LAND&WATER CONSULTING,INC. 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 P.O. Box 1122 Bozeman,MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59715 December 2003 Project No: 430009 LAND WATER • • � � '� i� . � `� I `; �i l + I 1 1 I { . I i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................1 2.0 REGULATORY SETTING.......................................................................................I 2.1 Wetland Delineation......................................................................................................2 2.2 Wetland Delineation......................................................................................................2 2.3 Wetland Delineation......................................................................................................2 3.0 METHODS....................................................:..............................................................4 3.1 Hydrology Methods.................................................................................................4 3.2 Soils Methods..........................................................................................................5 3.3 Vegetation Methods................................................................................................5 3.4 Rationale Used in Field Delineation.......................................................................5 4.0 RESULTS..............................................................................................................:.....5 4.1 Climate and Ecological Setting...............................................................................6 4.2 Hydrology. ........................................................................:.....................................6 4.3 Soils.........................................................................................................................7 4.4 Vegetation...............................................................................................................7 4.5 General Wetland and Waters of the U.S. Description............................................9 4.6 Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Jurisdictional Status...........................................9 5.0 SUMMARY...............................................................................................................10 6.0 REFERENCES..........................................................................................................11 FIGURES Figure 1 — West Winds Community Project Site Location Figure 2 - Gallatin County Soil Survey Map TABLES Table 1 -Dominant Hydrophytic Plants within the Delineated Wetlands Table 2 -Dominant Upland Plants in Areas Adjacent to Wetlands APPENDICES Appendix A—Exhibit A: Wetland Delineation Map Appendix B—COE Data Sheets Appendix C— Wetland Photographs Appendix D—COE Jurisdictional Determination • 0 0 West Winds Wetland Delineation Report December 2003 Land&Water Consulting Inc. • 1.0INTRODUCTION Land&Water Consulting, Inc. (LWC) conducted a wetland and waters of the U.S. delineation of the West Winds Community project site in July, 2003 for Quest West, LLC. The subject property is 148.95 acres and is located in the northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County(Figure 1). Wetland types within the project site are classified as riverine and depression under the Hydrogeomorphic classification system(Smith and others 1995). Under the Cowardin system (Cowardin et. al. 1979)the wetland types are classified as riverine and palustrine wetlands. A wetland delineation map is included in Appendix A as Exhibit A. y N • • • � l 3 Durston Road I-90 Approximate Property �- -- Boundary Oak Street NW 1/4 Section 2 TlS R5E i Trae%r I f 4 X. 4 � i I f ii '' • — I 1 � j ;.. l_ • 9 I ' j•• I: is =Y: City of `t i ' • i i 1 , : i ter; ;:<i :y .» i Bozeman '3 �s j 2 9 j' as '' sir; ' `i li . : _ ;�'.t I Park ts�d:':�?ly: •, ---' d,v .. Figure 1. West Winds Project Site(USGS Bozeman,MT, 1992). 2.0 REGULATORY SETTING In 1977, an Executive Order was enacted for the protection of wetlands. Revisions to the Clean Water Act(CWA), specifically Section 404, have made it the principal regulatory tool pertaining to wetlands and other"waters of the United States". The objective of wetland protection is"to restore and maintain the chemical,physical, and biological integrity of our Nation's waters". The COE enforces the CWA. Placement of dredged or fill material into wetlands or other 1 • ,, { I� � �'� �. I �'� a ';� '� , } ��r �� r t� �` 'II ; , West Winds Wetland Delineation Report December 2003 Land& Water Consulting,Inc. • "waters of the United States" is regulated by the Corps of Engineers (COE) and the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)under Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act. -2.1 Wetland Delineation For delineation purposes, wetlands are defined as: Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and dura(ion sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions (33 CFR 328.3, 40 CFR 230.3). The interaction of wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil results in the development of site characteristics unique to wetlands. Consequently, except under certain circumstances,the COE Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) requires that a minimum of one positive indicator from each of these three parameters be documented to positively delineate an area as a wetland. Unvegetated stream channels, open water areas, and similar areas are not wetlands,but are generally regulated by the COE and EPA as waters of the United States. 2.2 Waters of the U.S. Definition Waters of the United States generally include: waters which were or could be used for interstate • or foreign commerce; all interstate waters including interstate wetlands; all other waters including intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes,wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use or degradation of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce; all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the U.S.; tributaries of aforementioned waters; territorial seas; and wetlands adjacent to aforementioned waters (other than wetlands). 2.3 Regulatory Jurisdiction According to 33 CFR 328.4 (c),the limits of jurisdiction in non-tidal waters are as follows: • In the absence of adjacent wetlands, the jurisdiction extends to the ordinary high water mark, or • When adjacent wetlands are present, the jurisdiction extends beyond the ordinary high water mark to the limit of the adjacent wetlands. • When the water of the United States consists only of wetlands the jurisdiction extends to the limit of the wetland. On January.9th, 2001 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that the COE lacks the authority to regulate isolated wetlands via the"Migratory Bird Rule". The 1986 Migratory Bird Rule stated that Section 404 of the CWA extended to intrastate waters which provide habitat for: birds protected by migratory treaties; other migratory birds which cross state lines; or endangered • species. Intrastate waters used to irrigate crops sold in interstate commerce were also included. As a result of the court decision, many isolated wetlands (not connected or adjacent to other* 2 West Winds Wetland Delineation Report December 2003 Land& Water Consulting,Inc. waters of the U.S.), which previously fell under COE authority, may now be unregulated for Section 404 purposes. Two recent federal actions were initiated in January 2003 in an attempt to facilitate interpretation of the 2001 court ruling. The first was an Advanced Notice of Public Rulemaking(ANPRM) on the Clean Water Act Regulatory Definition of"Waters of the United States". The ANPRM seeks public comment on whether the factors listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(3)(i)-(iii) (i.e., use of a water by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes,the presence of fish or shellfish that could be taken and sold in interstate commerce,the use of water for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce) or any other factors provide a basis for determining CWA jurisdiction over isolated, intrastate, non-navigable waters. The ANPRM also seeks public comment on whether the regulations should define"isolated water" and if so, what factors should be used in determining whether a water is isolated or not for jurisdictional purposes. The second was issuance of updated joint COE/EPA guidance regarding jurisdictional determinations. The guidance concludes that: "...field staff should not assert CWA jurisdiction over isolated waters that are both intrastate and non-navigable, where the sole basis available for asserting CWA jurisdiction rests on any of the factors listed in the "Migratory Bird Rule". In addition,field staff should seek formal project- specific HQ approval prior to asserting jurisdiction over waters based on other factors listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(3)(i)-(iii). • Field staff should continue to assert jurisdiction over traditional navigable waters (and adjacent wetlands) and, generally speaking, their tributary systems (and adjacent wetlands). Field staff should make jurisdictional and permitting decisions on a case-by-case basis considering this guidance, applicable regulations, and any additional relevant court decisions. . Where questions remain, the regulated community should seek assistance from the agencies on questions of jurisdiction." Making preliminary jurisdictional determinations has been difficult in light of these legal uncertainties. The COE and EPA currently define "adjacent" as "bordering, contiguous, or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes and the like are `adjacent wetlands"'. Again,jurisdiction will ultimately be decided by the COE and EPA relative to each of the wetlands and other waters delineated in this project area. The COE policies regarding regulatory jurisdiction in wetlands artificially created by seepage, wetlands in artificially irrigated areas, and wetlands in roadside ditches are discussed in Regulatory Guidance Letters MRO 92-02 (COE 1992c), MRO 92-01 (COE 1992b), and MRO 95-10 (COE 1995),respectively. • 3 West Winds Wetland Delineation Report December 2003 Land& Water Consulting,Inc. • Generally, the COE maintains jurisdiction over non-isolated wetlands that are hydrologically charged by irrigation seepage as long as the seepage is considered"normal circumstances"for the wetlands it creates (COE 1992c). The COE does not generally maintain jurisdiction over wetlands in artificially irrigated areas unless: the wetland has additional hydrological sources;the wetland is of significant regional or local value, or; elimination of the irrigation could not be accomplished in the near future(COE 1992b). According to published guidance,the COE generally does not consider ditches excavated on dry land as jurisdictional "waters of the United States". It is the COE intent that jurisdiction of these areas be taken only in exceptional cases, and that normally they will not regulate the filling of any ditch that was originally excavated on dry land (COE 1995). However, the COE Omaha District has recently issued unpublished guidance to the effect that excavated irrigation and drainage ditches may be considered jurisdictional if they have a downstream surface connection to other waters of the U.S. (Tillinger pers. comm.). It should be noted that the COE and the EPA reserve the right to determine jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis (CFR Vol. 51 No. 219). Jurisdiction will ultimately be decided by the COE and EPA relative to each of the wetlands ultimately delineated in this project area. 3.0 METHODS Routine methodology protocols were used as outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratories, 1987). At least one routine wetland • determination data form (Appendix B)was completed for each wetland and water of the U.S. at an established sample point(SP)and field data on hydrology and vegetation were collected at each location. Boundaries and sample point locations were pin flagged and numbered sequentially on the ground. Photographs were taken of each area and are on file at Land & Water Consulting and included in Appendix D. All flag locations were located and mapped using resource-grade GPS methods by HKM Engineering, Inc. 3.1 Hydrology Methods Surface and subsurface hydrology observations were made in the field. These direct observations were combined with long-term weather data and local knowledge to estimate longer-term relationships between hydrology and climate. Two criteria were addressed: 1)the ponding criterion and 2)the shallow groundwater criterion. Both criteria require the same minimum periods of active hydrology as discussed below. In ponded circumstances and in groundwater driven systems, continuous inundation or saturation for greater than 12.5 percent of the growing season is clear evidence of active wetland hydrology, whereas inundation or saturation for periods less than 5 percent of the growing season is clear evidence of non-wetland conditions. Systems with continuous inundation or saturation between 5 and 12.5 percent of the growing season may or may not be jurisdictional wetlands based on other criteria. This percent of the growing season translates to approximately 4.4 to 11 days of continuous saturation in an approximate 88-day growing season for the Bozeman area(USDA 2002). 4 W • � •West Winds Wetland Delineation Report December 2003 Land& Water Consulting,Inc. • The Corps of Engineers has not strictly interpreted"Saturation to the surface" as free water all the way to the soil surface; it has allowed for some capillary effects. Nationally, either direct observations of inundation or well data showing a free water surface at depths less than 12 inches continuously for more than 5 percent of the growing season have been used to distinguish active wetland hydrology. Lacking long term well and surface water monitoring data,we used field evidence to determine current wetland hydrology. 3.2 Soils Methods Soil data collection was conducted using standard hydric soil identification techniques. Field indications of prolonged inundation or shallow groundwater during the growing season were evaluated. The predominant soil features used as indicators of hydric soils were aquic moisture regimes, bright mottles/low chromas, and high organic matter content. 3.3 Vegetation Methods Vegetation protocols followed national standards (US-ACOE, 1987 and 1992), using the basic rule that in order to meet the hydrophytic vegetation criteria, more than 50% of dominant species from all strata need to be OBL (obligate wetland species), FACW(facultative wetland species), or FAC (facultative species) excluding FAC- (facultative species indicating "slightly less frequently found in wetlands"). • Indicator status was derived from the northwest(Region 9)national list of plant species that occur in wetlands (1988). Observations were made during July 2003. All dominant species were identifiable. 3.4 Rationale Used in Field Delineation Jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. were identified as those areas having wetland hydrology, hydric soils and wetland vegetation. Non jurisdictional (isolated)wetlands were identified using the same criteria but these wetlands did not have a connection or were not adjacent to a water of the United States consisting of continuous wetland area or a stream with identifiable bed and banks. Data within this report regarding jurisdictional status is preliminary and will be confirmed and finalized after the delineation has been verified by the COE. 4.0 RESULTS Six (6)wetlands were delineated within the subject property: two (2) riverine (BB-1 and 2), one (1)riverine/depression(BB/W-I complex), and three (3) depression(W-1, 2, and 3). The wetland acreage totals 3.07 acres. A map of the wetland delineation is included in Appendix A as Exhibit A. • 5 i West Winds Wetland Delineation Report December 2003 Land& Water Consulting,Inc. • 4.1 Climate and Ecological Setting The area of investigation is approximately 148.95 acres and is at an elevation range of 4,720 to 4760 feet above sea level. The site was most recently used for agricultural cropland. The average frost-free period (growing season)according to data collected at Montana State University(1 mile north of the project site)is reported as 88 days (USDA 2002). Five to 12.5 percent of the growing season(the period required to meet saturation/inundation criteria) would therefore be 4 to 11 days. This wetland investigation was conducted during the active growing season. For the period January 1 through August 31, 2003 the Belgrade Airport (5 miles NW of site) recorded 10.4 inches of precipitation and represents 104%of the 1941 to March of 2003 average (South Western Regional Climate Center, 2003). Southwestern Montana has experienced a drought the last 5 years which may affect wetland vegetation and hydrologic indicators. The wetland and waters of the U.S. areas within the site did not appear to be abnormally affected by the drought. In addition,no marginal wetland areas were observed within the site that could have been affected by the drought to an extent that confused boundary detection. 4.2 Hydrology During fieldwork in July 2003,primary wetland hydrology indicators were observed throughout all areas identified as wetlands. These primary wetland indicators included inundation, saturation within the upper 12 inches,drainage patterns in wetlands and waters.of the U.S., and • sediment deposits. The two (2) waterways (BB-1 and 2) within the property are ditches; BB-1 is a lateral ditch off of the historic Harmon ditch and BB-2 is the Section line ditch, a lateral off of the Farmers' Canal. The waterway/wetland complex (BB/W-1) was historically connected to Harmon ditch but no culvert currently connects these drainages; the culvert beneath Oak Street conveys water from the historic Harmon ditch into the BB-1 lateral. Though no water was flowing through the Harmon ditch and into the BB-1 lateral during the investigation, water was observed in the lateral approximately 100 feet north of the culvert end. Therefore, BB-1 functions as a drain ditch, collecting and conveying groundwater along most of its length. No water was observed within the BB/W-I complex nor any recent evidence that the bed and bank has conveyed or collected groundwater. Toward the north end of the complex, water appears to collect in the area of the BB-1 confluence. No surface water was observed in wetlands 1,2 or 3. Soil pits in W-2 and 3 revealed saturated soils; saturation was not observed in the W-1 sample point. It is likely that stormwater and snowmelt collects and ponds in these areas as a result of clay layers. • 6 Xest Winds Watand Dehneatian Repo December 2003 iw d h Water Consulting Inc. 6090 Soil Series SOB 50913 soil Series Soil Series 648 IAIIston Ave. Soil Series Approzimate Property510H 510B 511A SOB Boundary Soil Series 51013 Soil Series Section line Ditch North 19"`.Ave. Figure 2. Gallatin County Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2002) of the Alder Creek property. • 4.3 Soils. The soil surveys are mapped by the NRCS on a scale of 1:24,000 with a minimum soil delineation size of 5 acres. There are five(5) soil series mapped within the subject property (Figure 2);all of the soil series are classified as non-hydric, however three of the series include hydric inclusions. Soil series within the project include: Blackdog Silt Loam(50B: non-hydric); Amsterdam Silt Loam(53B: non-hydric);Enbar Loam(509B: hydric inclusion Ophur Loam); Meadowcreek Loam(510B; hydric inclusion Blossburg Loam); and, Fairway Silt Loam(511A: hydric inclusion Blossberg Loam). All wetlands and waters of the U.S. features are located within Meadowcreek and Fairway Silt Loam series with the exception of the Section Line ditch that is located in the Amsterdam Loam. 4.4 Vegetation The majority of plant species could be identified during the investigation in July. The site is primarily comprised of agricultural crops with scrub-shrub and emergent communities dispersed along the drainages(Tables 1 and 2). Mature cottonwoods(Populus balsamifera)thrive within be bed and bank/wetland complex in the central area of the property. The highest diversity of emergent wetland vegetation is located within the BB-1 streambed. An emergent slope wetland comprised of beaked sedge(Carex utriculata) and Balsam rush(Juncus balsamifera)is located in the west-central area of the BB/W-1 complex. Beaked sedge also proliferates the adjacent • margins of the Section Line ditch bed. 7 West Winds Wetland Delineation Report December 2003 Land& Water Consulting,Inc. • Table 1 Dominant H dro h tic Plants within the Delineated Wetlands includes FAC species) ..__............_=S ecie&! ame.-= -_—�.-- IndIcatorStatusl Agrostis alba-redtop FACW Alo ecurus arundinaceae-Garrison creeping foxtail NI Alo ecurus pratensis—meadow foxtail FACW Calama rostis ne ecta—slimstem reedgrass FACW Carex a erta- Columbia sedge FACW Carex nebrascensis—Nebraska sedge OBL Carex stipata—stalk-grain sedge OBL Carex utriculata-beaked sedge OBL Conium maculatum—poison-hemlock FACW- Cornus stolini era—red-osier dogwood FACW GI ceria grandis—reed meadow ass OBL Hierchloe oderata—holy ass FACW Juncus balticus—Baltic rush OBL Lemna minor-lesser duckweed OBL Mimulus guttatus—common large monkey-flower OBL Phalaris arundinacea—reed canary grass FACW. Poa alustris—fowl bluegrass FAC Po ulus balsami era—balsam poplar FAC Ribes americanum—wild black currant FAC Rumex cris us—curly dock FACW Salix bebbiana—Bebb willow FACW Salix exi a—sandbar willow FACW Salix lutea—yellow willow OBL • Scir us microcar us—small-fruit bullrusb OBL Solanum dulcamara—climbing nightshade FAC T ha lati olia—broad-leaf cattail OBL Veronica Americana—Americanspeedwell OBL Table 2. Dominant Upland Plants in Areas Adjacent to Wetlands indicator.Status . A o ron species-wheat ass FACU Bromus inermis—smooth brome Cirsium arvense—Canada thistle FACU C no lossum o rcinale—houndstongue Lactuca serriola—prickly lettuce FAC- Phleum pratense-timothy FAC- Poa ratensis-Kentucky bluegrass FACU Prunus vir iniana-choke cherry FACU Silene vul aris--bladder cam ion Smilacina stellata—starry false-solomon's seal FAC- S m hocar us albus-snowberry FACU Tanacetum vul are—common tansy Taraxacum o rcinale-common dandelion FACU Trago ogon dubius—western salsify *No indicator listed in the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands in the Northwest. 8 West Winds Wetland Delineation Re ort • December tuber 2003 Land& Water Consulting, Inc. 4.5 General Wetland and Waters of the U.S.Description • Wetlands were classified according to the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification method. HGM classification is based on geomorphic (landscape) setting,water source, and hydrodynamics (Smith et al. 1995). The HGM wetland classes occurring in the project area are riverine (BB-1 and 2), depression(W-1, 2 and 3), and riverine/depression (BB/W-I complex). Riverine wetlands occur in floodplains and riparian corridors in association with stream channels (perennial, intermittent or ephemeral) and irrigation ditches. Dominant water sources for BB-1 and 2 are ground/irrigation water and irrigation water,respectively. Depression wetlands may occur in closed (primary source is groundwater)or open (primary source is from precipitation, overflow or interflow) depressions. Water levels in wetlands 1, 2, and 3 are not influenced by overflow,however the depressions do collect precipitation and are influenced by groundwater levels. In addition to their hydrogeomorphic setting,wetlands were classified in terms of their vegetative structure or substrate using a system developed by Cowardin et al. (1979). This system categorizes wetlands based on which vegetation stratum or substrate comprises the uppermost layer with aerial coverage of at least 30 percent. All of the wetlands within the project site are dominated by shrub cover and therefore are classified as palustrine, scrub-shrub. The active waterways within the site, BB-1 and 2, are dominated by emergent vegetation and therefore are classified as riverine, emergent wetlands. These ditches also include small reaches • dominated by shrubs and trees,but overall the riverine system is dominated by emergent species. The BB/W-I complex is a riverine/palustrine system comprised of emergent/scrub-shrub components. There is also a small reach of mature trees within the complex. The total acreage of all wetlands is 3.07 acres; the delineation map is included in Appendix A, Exhibit A. COE data.forms were collected for each area(Appendix B). Photographs of all sites excluding BB-2 (Section Line ditch) are included as Appendix D. 4.6 Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Jurisdictional Status Waterways and wetlands that are adjacent or connected to waters of the U.S. are considered jurisdictional. True irrigation ditches that do not carry groundwater and were constructed through upland areas may be considered non jurisdictional (see 2.0 Regulatory Setting). The COE had verified the wetland delineation and determined the jurisdictional status of the wetlands as follows (Appendix D). One ditch within the property, BB-1, appears to have been constructed in upland however it conveys groundwater and is therefore jurisdictional. The Section Line ditch is constructed in upland and is non jurisdictional. The wetland complex, BB/W-1, is jurisdictional because it is connected to what is now called Cattail Creek, a tributary to the East Gallatin River. Wetlands-1 and 2 are approximately 40 and 20 feet from waters of the U.S (BB-1 and BB/W-1, respectively) and are therefore considered adjacent to a waters of the U.S. and jurisdictional. Wetland-3 is 250 feet from a non jurisdiction waterway(BB-2, Section Line ditch), and is therefore non jurisdictional. 9 West Winds Wetland Delineation Re ort • December 2003 Land& Water Consulting,Inc. 5.0 SUMMARY • Land & Water Consulting,Inc. (LWC) conducted a wetland and waters of the U.S. delineation of the West Winds Community project site in July, 2003 for Quest West, LLC. The subject property is 148.95 acres and is located in the northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County (Figure 1). Wetlands within the project'site are classified as riverine and depression under the Hydrogeomorphic classification system (Smith and others 1995). Under the Cowardin system (Cowardin et. al. 1979)the systems are classified as riverine and palustrine wetlands. Six (6) wetlands were delineated within the subject property. The wetland acreage totals 3.07 acres. The COE had verified the wetland delineation and determined the jurisdictional status of the wetlands as follows (Appendix D): BB-1,BB/W-1, W-1,W-2 are jurisdictional and W-3 and BB-2 are non jurisdictional. • 10 West Winds Wetland Delineation Re ort December 2003 Land& Water Consulting, Inc. 6.0 REFERENCES • Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31.U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Services. Washington, D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington, DC. MT Fish, Wildlife, and Parks: 1993. Streams and Ditches in the City of Bozeman. Smith,R.D.,A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M.M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification,reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetland Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. State Engineers Office. 1953. Water Resources Survey Gallatin County, Montana: Part II. Helena, MT. Tillinger, T. Project Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Helena Regulatory Office,MT. Personal Communication. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Soil Survey of Gallatin County Area, • Montana. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1992. CECW-OR—March 6, 1992 memorandum: clarification and interpretation of the 1987 manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1992b. Regulatory guidance letter MRO 92-01, September 14, 1992. Omaha District. Omaha, Nebraska. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1992c. Regulatory guidance letter MRO 92-02, August 17, 1992. Omaha District. Omaha, Nebraska. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1995. Regulatory guidance letter MRO 95-10, November 17, 1995. Omaha District. Omaha, Nebraska. U.S. Geological Service. 1992. Bozeman, MT Topographic Maps. Western Regional Climate Center, 2003. Belgrade, MT Station: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi- bin/cliMAIN.pl?mtbelg. 11 Appendix A WEST WINDS COMMUNITY ALDER CREEK WETLAND AND WATER OF THE U.S. MAP Quest West, LLC • Bozeman, Montana WETLANDS MAP Y Lo I + -- 'K CtLYERT L- - - _ _ -�-� _ BAXTER LANE 41 Ell I I I .7 1 Y� ti7 /�J�d ���`�..i�_�1:'�.r:., ,j�:Tl• _ ��J, � I is I �. -_ --- - OAK—STREET' P cjj� — — s P LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI TY L BED aa" NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. F, GALLA77N COUNTY, MONTANA Inc.KWEighwal �a r---T—, , WA TER FEA TURFS A01 tomes Dr.&Ae 2 Bcwman MTs9ns x (4J se6. W 2Do 0 200 FIGURE 3 a FAX Nam)SWI73(1 -el I Kvk foot DATE:SEPT.27.2003 PRQECT ND.O/SO67.710 0 Owylpt 0 2003 M01 Fr{{ww"b.-,N ft9hb ftrrm& r s � Appendix B COE DATA SHEETS Quest West, LLC lder reek ubdivision o I& Bozeman, Montana 0 DATA FORM 0 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) J t/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/15/03 Applicant/Owner:- County: Gallatin. Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: Wetland-1 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-1 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 SOLDUL* H FAC 9 2 PRUVIR* S FACU 10 3 SALIX spp.* S FACW-OBL 11 4 ALOARUN H NI 12 5 SMISTE H FAC- 13 6 BROINE H (*UPL) 14 7 15 8 16 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 2/3 (dominant) emarks: dominant spp. at SP are Salix and nightshade; marginal wetland with a dominance primarily of willow and htshade throughout. *: dominant HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other . Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Very hot(100 deg)the last month and drought condition. The primary hydrologic indicator is the drainage pattern in the wetland: a linear depression approximately 1-2 feet below surrounding upland area. SOILS 8p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam aeries and Phase): Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? —X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-12 A 7.5YR 2.5/1 none loam 12+ AB gravels Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon. High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils-List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Impenetrable @ 12"' likely saturates at gravel layer during spring WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Wetland probably historically part of a larger scrub-shrub wetland complex. Wetland 50-100 ft from lateral drain ditch (also conveys Farmers' Canal water); likely jurisdictional because of adjacency to waters that connect to East Gallatin. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/15/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site:, X Yes No Community ID: Upland(adj.to W-1) Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: Sp-2 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 JUNBAL H FACW 9 2 TAROFF H FACU 10 3 POAPRA H FACU 11 4 CIRARV H FACU+ 12 5 TRADUB H no listing 13 (UPL) 6 LACSER H FAC- 14 7 15 8 16 rcent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 1/6 Remarks: JUNBAL likely a remnant of community prior to draining and placing fill in wet areas to create a road; upland weeds and grasses invading. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Area outside of drainage pattern in wetland. SOILS • Map Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam Series and Phase): Field Observations onomy(Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-6 A 10YR 2/1 none loam 6-16 A 10YR 2/1 10YR 5/8 30%;mod-lg loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List AL X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) marks: Impenetrable @ 12"' likely saturates at gravel layer during spring WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Area outside of drainage pattern; hydric soils likely a remnant of historic scrub-shrub WL. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 • DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) oject/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/17/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inca State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: Bed & Bank/ Wetland Complex-1 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: Sp-4 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 BROINE H no listing 9 (UPL) 2 CIRARV H FACU+ 10 3 PHAARU H FACW 11 4 TAROFF H FACU 12 5 13 6 14 7 15 8 16 °ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 1/4(including BROINE as UPQ emarks: Area upslope and adj. to seep area. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Groundwater evidently insufficient to create a veg. community dominated by WL species. - � • SOILS p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(51013);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam eries and Phase): Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 04 A 10YR 2/1 none loam 4-18 A 10YR 2/1 7.5YR 4/6 1% loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) 1Re­ma—rk—sTMoftIes likely a remnant of historic wetland conditions. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Area on edge of B&B/WL complex and immediately adjacent to agricultural field; non-WL area. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/17/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West', LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: Wetland-1 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-3 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 CARUTR H OBL 9 2 CIRARV S FACU+ 10 3 JUNBAL S FACW 11 4 12 5 13 6 14 7 15 8 16 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 2/3 7 marks: Area upslope of B&BNVL complex, likely sourced by seep. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): @ 8" X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Secondary drainage pattern in this area that is slightly elevated above primary drainage pattern; likely a seep. SOILS Ie p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loamries and Phase): Field Observations xonomy(Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? —X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist). Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-3 A 10YR 2/1 none loam 3-16 A 10YR 2/1 + 3/2 2.5YR 3/6 10%; mod. gravels 16+ A 10YR 2/1 + 3/2 2.5YR 3/6 clay loam Hydric Soil Indicators; Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) IRe-markis.:71mpenetrable @ 12"' likely saturates at gravel layer during spring WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Wetland area to west and part of B&BAWL complex; likely sourced by a seep. Likely jurisdictional because of connection to East Gallatin north of property boundary. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION • (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/17/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: Wetland-2 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-5 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 SALIX spp. H FACW-OBL 9 2 SOLD UL S FAC 10 3 CORSTOL S FACW 11 4 12 5 13 6 14 7 15 8 16 rcent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 3/3 Remarks:Area adj. to BB/WL Complex-1 and separated only by intrusions of small UPL veg. communites. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X . Aerial Photographs Inundated Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Evidence of current hydrology even though we are experiencing a drought. �. 0 SOILS IT'axonomy ap Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam eries and Phase): Field Observations (Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? -x Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-6 A 10YR 2/1 10YR 5/8 1%, fine loam 6+ AB impenetrable gravels Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Impenetrable @ 6" and moist, likely level of water infiltration. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Wetland island that was likely a part of the historic B&BAWL complex; isolated from the main drain/WL pattern (that is connected to East Gallatin north of property boundary) by <30 ft and therefore likely jurisdictional. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 DATA FORM • ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/23/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: Wetland-3 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-6 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 CIRARV H FACU+ 9 2 SOLDUL* S FAC 10 3 AGR. spp. S UPL 11 4 SALBEB* H FACW 12 5 13 6 14 7 15 8 16 77rcent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 2/2 (dominant) Remarks: Dominant spp. at SP are Salix and nightshade; marginal wetland with a dominance primarily of willow and nightshade throughout. *: dominant HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: 6" (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Interior of area not in agriculture has adequate hydrology to support dominance of willows and FAC understory nightshade). SOILS ap Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam eries and Phase): Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-3 A 10YR 2/1 none loam 3-6 A 10YR 4/1;4/2 gravelly clay loam 6/16 A 10YR 3/1;3/3 rocky clay loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Hydric soil indicators present. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Wetland is isolated from ditch or historic B&B or wetlands (>300 feet); likely non jurisdictional. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 • DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) oject/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/23/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: UPL Adj. to Wetland-3 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-7 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 CIRARV H FACU+ 9 2 ALOARUN S TII 10 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 14 7 15 8 16 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 1/1 (NI not counted) emarks: Appears like an historic swale that farmers have not hayed in years because of shrubs and low areas that may be mud hazards to equipment. However, area not wet enough to encourage dominance of true FAC-OBL hydrophytic spp. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns (in UPL actually) Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: 8" (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Interior of area not in agriculture and has adequate hydrology to support a NI spp.; further north area of brome and thistle. SOILS p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam eries and Phase): Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-8 A 10YR 2/1 none loam 8-16 A 10YR 2/1 10YR 5/8 5%;fine gravelly clay loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Hydric soil indicators present. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Area not a wetland as a result of NI spp. dominance; this could be a mitigation area if required. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 • DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/23/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: UPL adj. to B&B-1 (southern end) Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-g If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 CIRARV H FACU+ 9 2 CYNOFF H no listing 10 (UPL) 3 BROINE. H no listing 11 (UPL) 4 12 5 13 6 14 7 15 16 7Re rcent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 0/3 (including no listing spp.) marks: Area adj. to B&B-1a; fill in area as a result of old road placed here. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test A6k Other(Explain in Remarks) emarks: Area in fill adjacent to ditch proper; no hydrology. SOILS p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(51013);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam eries and Phase): Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-6 A 10YR 2/2 none. rocks, sm. amt. of loam 6+ (B) rocks;artificial fill for road Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) emarks: Could not get below 6" as a result of heavy rock/cobble layer: artificially filled for agricultural access road. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Area adjacent to irrigation ditch; does not qualify as WL. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 • DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) oject/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/23/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: B&B-1 (southern end) Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-9 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 PhiLPRA H FACU 9 2 ALOARU H NI 10 3 SOLDUL H FAC 11 4 CARAPE H FACW 12 5 SALEXI S FACW 13 6 SALBEB S FACW 14 7 15 8 16 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 4/6 marks: Area Win the ditch bottom; wetland fringe <1' on each side. Further north fringe 1-2 ft on each side and a higher hydrophytic diversity. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available -,X Water Marks X Drift Lines Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: Q (in.) FAC-Neutral Test surface Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Source of water irrigation from Farmers' Canal (via Harmon ditch) and ground water; evidence that water has flowed through ditch though but no surface water at this time. Flows into East Gallatin north of property: likely risdictional. SOILS F p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam *onomy ries and Phase): Field Observations (Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-2 A 10YR 2/2 none silt loam 2-8 A 10YR 2/1 fine gravelly loam 8+ rocky F 77 T Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Hydric soil indicators present; rock bed below 8 inches. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No Remarks: This segment of the ditch conveys water through a culvert to B&B-1; the source of both B&B-1 and B&B-1a is the Harmon ditch south of the property boundary which is culverted beneath Oak Street. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 • DATA FORM 0 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ject/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: . 7/23/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: B&B-1 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-10 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 ALOARU H NI 9 2 CYNOFF H no listing 10 3 SILVUL H no listing 11 4 CIRARV H FACU+ 12 5 13 6 14 7 15 8 16 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 0/4 (no listing and NI Ask counted as FACU spp.) marks: Sample point in side of ditch above emergent WL zone. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No saturation in this sample area; ditch not receiving irrigation water but begins to pick up ground water when it turns north and thus is performing as a drainage ditch. SOILS *axonomy p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam ries and Phase): Field Observations (Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-12 A 10YR 2/1 5YR 4/6 1%;fine loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils. Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Hydric soil indicators present; area could be a remnant of historic wetland or receive enough moisture to produce mottled soils but not hydrophytic veg. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X No Wetland Hydrology Present? X No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Sample point in ditch bank above influence of hydrology. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 DATA FORM • ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Oak Street Subdivision Date: 7/23/03 Applicant/Owner: Quest West, LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: Lynn Bacon, Land & Water Consulting, Inc. State: Montana Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site: X Yes No Community ID: B&B-1 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area?: Yes X No Plot ID: SP-11 If needed, explain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1 PHAARU H FACW 9 2 ALOARUN H NI 10 3 CAR UTR H OBL 11 4 SALBEB S FACW 12 5 TYPLAT H OBL 13 6 14 7 15 8 16 ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 4/5 Remarks: Ditch bottom and 1-2 ft to the side are vegetated with hydrophytic spp. HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: X Aerial Photographs Inundated Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available X Water Marks X Drift Lines Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: @surface (in.) FAC-Neutral Test Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Source of water from Farmers' Canal (via Harmon ditch)and groundwater. I SOILS p Unit Name Meadowcreek Loam(510B);hydric inclusion of Drainage Class: somewhat poorly Blossburg Loam eries and Phase): Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Frigid Fluvaquentic Haplustolls Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes No Profile Descri tion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-6 A 10YR 2/1 none fine gravelly silt loam 6+ rock bed Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Hydric soil indicators present. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Ditch receives water from Farmers' Canal and ground water; flows into East Gallatin north of property: likely jurisdictional. Approved by HQUSACE 2/92 • Appendix C WETLANDS AND WATERS OF THE U.S. PHOTOGRAPHS QUEST WEST, LLC Bozeman, Montana ` .T Yti ti �W` ' �— of r •s;'cf''r tits. + " :.}. Location: BB-1 Description: View is north Location: BB-1 Description:View is south • Location: BB-1 Description:View is west Location: BB-W-1 complex Description: West side of drainage in expanded wetland area;view is southeast IA JI� -: Location: East side of W-3 Description: View is west Location: UPL north of W-3 Description:View is north 0009 Oak Street Wetland LIW WATER f Location: W-1 Description: View is north Location: West side of W-2 Description: View is east 0009 Oak Street Wetland LAND &WATER �J �_ IiII If I I 1 ' I �` i � {E I.t � � �G ��I II�� i ', {� 1f L� `� 1t � � I � t 1 1+ I �� s • Appendix D COE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION QUEST WEST, LLC. Bozeman, Montana U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HELENA REGULATORY OFFICE 10 WEST 15TH STREET,SUITE 2200 HELENA,MONTANA 59626 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: October 9, 2003 Helena Regulatory Office Phone: (406)441-1375 Fax: (406)441-1380 RE: Corps File No. 2003-90-510,'Oak Street Subdivision Ms. Lynn Bacon Land and Water Consulting,Inc. 205 Haggerty Lane, Suite 170 PO Box'-1 122 Bozeman;Montana 59771 Dear Lynn: This letter is in reference to the wetland delineation that was prepared by Land and Water for the Oak Street Subdivisiion in Bozeman. The site was visited on July23,2003 to view the project area and verify the wetland boundaries, as requested. The wetland delineation is accepted as accurate: 'The wetlands 1 and 2 are subject to permitting • requirements under Section 404 as they are adjacent to two unnamed linear wetlands (BB-1 and BB and Land Complex 1)that are connected to the East Gallatin River. We concur that wetland 3 is isolated and is not subject to permitting requirements. Please contact me by mail or phone and reference Corps File No. 2003-90-510,in any future correspondence. Sincerely, C'Uti'Y� GrJ an Ramer oj ect Manager Helena Regulatory Office- Jean.L.Ramer@usace.army.mil Message. • Page 1 of 2 min Bacon To: Jean.L.Ramer@nwo 02.usace.army.m i I Cc: Clint Litle (clitle@hkminc.com) Subject: RE: Oak Street Subdivision Thank you, Jean. Lynn Bacon Wetland Scientist/Biologist Land&Water Consultin&Inc. 205 Hoggarty Lane,Suite 130 P.O.Box 1122 Bozeman,MT 59771 Tel. 406.586.1411 Fax. 406.586.4035 Cell:406.586.6993 E. lyn.n.bacbn@l ndandwater.net -----Original Message----- • From: Jean.L.Ramer@nwo02.usace.army.mil [mailto:Jean.L.Ramer@ nwo02.usace.army.mil]. Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:15 PM To:.Lynn Bacon Subject: RE: Oak Street Subdivision Hi Lynn, The Section Line Ditch is a non jurisdictional"true"ditch. Email correspondence is sufficient, no need to write a letter. . Jean Ramer US Army Corps of Engineers 10 West 15th Street, Suite 2200 Helena, Montana 59626 (406)441-1378 Phone (406)441-1380 Fax -----Original Message----- From: Lynn Bacon [mailto:lynn.bacon@landandwater.net] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Ramer, Jean L Subject: Oak Street Subdivision Hi Jean, The engineers have added the Section line ditch to the property and I had it mapped in October. When we did the Baxter Meadows property adjacent to the west, we had it as NJ. Would this status hold true now? When I examined it this fall it was bone dry. Would this e-mail suffice as"official" correspondence relating to JD status? If so, great. I can write a letter if need be. / Thanks! Lynn 12/5/2003 C. GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION REPORT Groundwater Investigation For West Winds Planned Community Preliminary PUD Application Prepared For: Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 � N Q. 66 Prepared By: HKM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 February 2004 04S067.110 • West Winds Development Groundwater Investigation Groundwater in the vicinity of the project area is primarily found in coarse to fined grained sediments that range in size from boulders to clay. These.sediments were deposited in the form of alluvial fans from later Tertiary to early Quaternary time. (Slagle 1995.) Within the project site, a series of nine (9) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed on April 8,2003. (See Figure 1.) Construction consisted on placing a 3"diameter PVC perforated sewer pipe in a soils investigation test pit. After installation of the monitoring pipe the test pit was backfilled with native material. Soil logs of each test pit along with a description of each monitoring wells construction are included in Appendix A. After installation,the groundwater level in each monitoring well was periodically monitored. Monitoring records are included in Table 1 and are also shown on Figure 2 and 3. These investigations and groundwater monitoring found the following: • The depth to groundwater ranges from approximately 2 to 10 feet below ground surface. Groundwater becomes shallower from south to north across the site, and is also shallower in the topographically low-lying areas. r • Groundwater levels in the southern and western portions of the site rose during the spring and early summer. The maximum fluctuation observed was approximately 3 feet at MW- • 9. This rise and subsequent decline in groundwater levels was in close correlation to the time period that the Section Line Ditch(Davis Lane). (See Table 3.) • Groundwater levels generally declined in the central and northeast portions of the site during the monitoring period. • By October 17, 2003 groundwater levels dropped below the bottom of all nine of the monitoring wells. In several cases the bottom portion of the Monitor Well casing filled up with silt,which made it impossible to continue monitoring groundwater when the groundwater levels dropped below the top of the silt. On December 19, 2003 during the Geotechnical investigation, four(4) additional groundwater monitoring wells (B-1 through 4)were installed. (See Figure 1.) Logs of these wells are included in Appendix A, and a further discussion of the Geotechnical Investigation is available in the Geotechnical Investigation Report. These monitoring wells were installed inside the geotechnical borehole; and, are completed at a deeper and more discrete interval than the MW series monitor wells. Typical installations consist of screen from 10 to 15 feet with sand pack up to 7 feet, and a bentonite seal to ground surface. Despite the slightly different completion design, groundwater levels are consistent with the groundwater monitoring data trends observed in MW-1 through MW-9. (See Table 1 and Figure 1 and 2.) Groundwater monitoring to date in the B series monitoring wells shows that groundwater is between 4 and 9.2 feet below ground surface. (See Table 2.) • • • Both the test pit logs and the Geotechnical investigation logs show that the lithology of the site consists of silty sand, gravel and cobbles that are overlain by silt loam and silty clay loam. This is consistent with the Natural Resources Conservation Service(MRCS) soils properties descriptions(See Appendix B.) During excavation of the test pits they filled with groundwater quite rapidly,which is a good indicator that there is large quantities of groundwater at a shallow depth below the site. According to Williams Plumbing and Heating who installed a water main line(approximately 6.5 feet deep) across the full length of the site(from south to north), trench dewatering was required. Typical dewatering consisted of installing dewatering wells (drive/slurry points)on approximately 100-foot spacing along the pipeline alignment. Then each dewatering wells was pumped with a 5 hp sump pump for approximately 3 weeks. At the onset of dewatering,the pumps continuously ran at a rate of approximately 300 gpm per dewatering well. By the end of three weeks the pumping rate diminished significantly and each pump was only periodically cycling. At that point Williams began excavation and the trenches stood open quite well and pipe installation was straightforward. In general,Williams indicated that progressively more dewatering effort was required the further north they went across the property, and toward the center of the property which is near the topographically low lying areas Adjoining Wells Appendix C of this report includes a detailed listing of existing adjoining wells as listed by the • Groundwater-Water Information Center Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Montana Tech of the University of Montana. Appendix C also has a map with the well location plotted per the lists description. Reference: Slagle, S.E., 1995 Geohydrologic Conditions and Land Use In The Gallatin Valley, Southwestern Montana, 1992-93. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4304. May 1995. Groundwater-Water Information Center Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Montana Tech of the University of Montana. • 4� flT $jq 5 TBaxter Lane mw M W 31 8-3 ® WEST INDS -5 coM NITY 3 i • ® M � _A�W� --- M W-4 21 MW 7 GMW-8 MW-9012 - z . 4 � • stan RoadPC r I � , � �` mow; {11,� +'�- � , •15 LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY H NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.ZS., R.&E., P.M.M.® °R�R°,�„�"°"' "°"�" ` GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA �NOIN���IN _N- ^'' HKM Engkwe a lm GROUND WA TER McChesney Suffe on°l ode. MONITOR/NG WEL L S 601 Nildw Dr.,.Suffe.' Bozeman,MT S9715 (406)SB&M wo o 5W FIGURE 1 FAX(406)586-1730 .od. r..t DAtE:,wa 136 2M vRAE.cr R0.oum.no Copt 0 2M NO W Ya.,N NOto Rwmwd - Figure 2. West Winds Development Depth to Groundwater 0 e MW-1 - --MW-2 -r-MW-3 ---MW-4 ❑ MW-5 A-MW-6 -0-MW-7 MW-8 -O-MW-9 -♦-B-1 -0 B-3 B-5 B-7 2 w w 4 V\� ° ° ❑ ® �. _° 6 L v d o l� 10 Data points that are Red indicate the Monitor WetF being dry. 12 4/1/03 5/1/03 6/1/03 7/1/03 8/1/03 8/31/03 10/1/03 10/31/03 12/1/03 12/31/03 1/31/04 3/1/04 • • • Figure 3. West Winds Development Groundwater Elevation 4735 -e-MW-1 -�MW-2 4730 da -T-MW-3 ---MW-4 4725 w -O-MW-5 d w c 4720 w - MW-6 R 0--MW-7 L d w l0 3 4715 - —MW-8 c 0 _ -0 MW-9 4710 0-B-3 4705 e efe� fete :ems � --#-B-5 e •— • • Data points that are Red indicate the Monitor Well being dry. -�-B-7 4700 4/1/03 5/1/03 6/1/03 7/1/03 8/1/03 8/31/03 10/1/03 10/31/03 12/1/03 12/31/03 1/31/04 3/1/04 Table 1 West Qnds Development Groundwater Monitoring Log • • Date MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW4 MW-5 MW-6 NM-7 MW-8 Mw-9 -TUC--Up TOC Elevation 1.13 4710.49 1.67 4713.29 2.52 4715.06 3.35 4723.7 2.6 4723.66 3.48 4724.8 0.79 4735.47 1.63 4739.49 1.13 4739.7 y y y eo cN as i w Y w « w Y w cca i N 4�0. ed 3 o b o $ b d o $ b b o $ b b o 3 o b o S o d o S b b o 3 i b o 8 v o °o Date A P C�7 W A VrW A�D C�JW A.: C W A�A C� W A C7W A.. C7W A �0 aW A 8 6W Comments 4/9/03 5.41 1 4703.95 3.31 4708.31 1.78 4710.76 2.43 4717.92 3.14 4717.92 3.05 4718.27 8.51 4726.17 9.99 4727.87 7.49 4731.08 4/17/03 5.55 4703.81 4.63 4706.99 2.59 4709.95 2.49 4717.86 3.16 4717.9 3.06 4718.26 8.51 4726.17 10.04 4727.82 7.41 4731.16 4/24/03 4.96 4704.4 4.15 4707.47 2.23 4710.31 1.66 4718.69 2.45 4718.61 2.43 4718.89 7.91 4726.77 9.32 4728.54 6.73 4731.84 5/l/03 5.35 4704.01 4.57 4707.05 2.75 4709.79 2.09 4718.26 2.91 4718.15 2.94 4718.38 7.94 4726.74 9.05 4728.81 6.85 4731.72 IMMV 5/8/03 5.02 4704.34 4.36 4707.26 2.16 4710.38 1.76 4718.59 2.62 4718.44 2.68 4718.64 7.7 4726.98 8.52 4729.34 6.56 4732.01 5/15/03 5.47 4703.89 4.72 4706.9 2.7 4709.84 2.15 4718.2 2.95 4718.11 2.97 4718.35 7.7 4726.98 8.88 4728.98 6.56 4732.01 6/3/03 5.52 4703.84 5.18 4706.44 3.21 4709.33 2.07 4718.28 3.25 4717.81 3.2 4718.12 7.46 4727.22 7.16 4730.7 6.29 4732.28 6/17/03 5.69 4703.67 5.3 4706.32 3.23 4709.31 2.2 4718.15 3.46 4717.6 3.34 4717.98 7.43 4727.25 7.05 4730.81 6.26 4732.31 MW-3 dry/silted in 7/1/03 5.23 4704.13 5.43 4706.19 3.23 4709.31 1.82 4718.53 3.28 4717.78 3.31 4718.01 7.19 4727.49 5.62 4732.24 6.19 4732.38 7/21/03 6.7 4702.66 5.88 4705.74 3.23 4709.31 3.17 4717.18 4.09 4716.97 4.03 4717.29 8.18 4726.5 8.81 4729.05 7.04 4731.53 8/18/03 6.87 4702.49 6.47 4705.15 3.23 4709.31 4.12 4716.23 5.16 4715.9 4.72 4716.6 8.66 4726.02 10.3 4727.56 8.02 4730.55 MW-1,2,6,&7 dry 10/17/03 6.87 4702.49 6.47 4705.15 3.23 4709.31 4.65 4715.7 5.3 4715.76 4.72 4716.6 8.66 4726.02 10.57 4727.29 8.22 4730.35 All MW s dry 1/7/04 2/4/04 6.87 4702.49 5.71 4705.91 3.23 4709.31 3.83 4716.52 4.96 4716.1 4.72 4716.6 8.66 4726.02 10.57 4727.29 8.22 4730.35 Table 2 West Winds Development Groundwater Monitoring Log(Geotecnical Boreholes) Date B-1 B-3 B-5 B-7 Stick-up TOC Elevation 2 4709.9 2 4719.9 2 4721.3 2 4729.9 o ° o ° 0 v b O ci .b c G. O p C, y O y G. O 6 0 p > Date p U u7 A U W A C�J w A C� cil • 1/7/04 4.00 4703.90 9.20 4708.70 5.40 4713.90 7.10 1 4720.80 2/4/04 3.50 1 4704.40 1 8.40 4709.50 1 4.90 1 4714.40 5.88 1 4722.02 Table 3 West Winds Development Section Line Ditch Flow Records Date Time SW-1 Flow(cfs) Comments 4/24/03 3:10 4.8 0 Some water in west side ditch. Only at SW-1 5/1/03 1:36 5.3 0 Ditch Dry 5/8/03 11:29 4.79 0 Some water in west side ditch. Only at SW-1 5/15/03 3:16 5.3 0 Some water in west side ditch.Only at SW-1 6/3/03 2:03 2.46 2.25 Water present along the entire length of the west side ditch 6/17/03 2:48 2.21 3 Water present along the entire length of the west side ditch 7/1/03 11:31 2 4 Water present along the entire length of the west side ditch 7/21/03 13:10 5.3 0 Ditch Dry 8/18/03 13:15 1 0 Ditch dry. SW-1 monitoring oint/ i e removed • 10/17/03 1 0 113itch dry. SW-1 monitoring point/pipe removed SW-1 consists of a 1" PVC pipe embedded in the ditch bed approximately 6". The bottom 1' of the pipe is perforated. The well is located approximately 100 yards south of MW-1 and at the bottom of the section line ditch that extends along the west boundary of the project site. West Winds Development Surface Water Levels d 0 W CJ 1 0 L 2 W A 3 0 4 r 5 A 6 4/1/03 4/21/03 5/11/03 5/31/03 6/20/03 7/10/03 7/30/03 Appendix A Test Pit Soil Logs For Monitor Wells Geotechnical Boring Logs For Monitoring Wells TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-1 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4709.36 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 6 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j > Pd % m Of 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Moist. Many roots. Slightly plastic. 4708 CL-ML Silty clay to clayey silt. Medium brown with slight • yellowish brown tint. Moist. Slightly plastic. 2 lo 4706 4 4704 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 5"minus cobbles. Saturated at 6 feet. 6 4702 8 4700 Total depth 9.0 feet. • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.13 to 8.87 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-2 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE LOCATION Cascade Homes 4/8/03 ELEV. West Winds 4711.62 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 4.67feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Z USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC m � 0 0 A X CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Many roots. Slightly plastic. • 4710 2 CL-ML Silty clay. Yellowish brown.Moist.Moderately plastic. oo CL-ML Silty clay to clay. Lean and moderate to highly plastic. 4708 Some silt lenses and scattered 3"to 6"minus cobbles from 4 5.0 to 7.0 feet. 4706 6 GP-GM Poorly graded silty clay with cobbles. 4704 8 Total depth 8.5 feet. 4702 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.67 to 8.33 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. 0 TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-3 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE LOCATION Cascade Homes 4/8/03 ELEV. West Winds 4712.54 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 5 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS J > USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC m 0 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Moist 4712 Many roots. Slightly plastic. lo Maximum density and optimum moisture. 108.4 16.2 LL-28 PL-11 • 2 CL-ML Silty clay. Medium brown to yellowish brown. Moist. 4710 ollol/ Many roots. Slightly plastic. oo lo 4 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 5"minus cobbles and few 8"minus cobbles. Saturated at 5 feet. 4708 6 4706 Total depth 7.5 feet. 8 4704 • F tes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -2.52 to 7.48 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. 0 TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-4 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4720.35 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 4 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y W USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC > >_ P % m o 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Moist. 4720 Many roots. Slightly plastic. M-S 'Silty sandy gravel with scattered 8"minus cobbles. Medium brown. Moist.Moderate roots.Saturated at 4 feet. • 2 4718 4 _ 4716 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 8"minus cobbles. 6 4714 Total depth 7.0 feet. 8 4712 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -3.35 to 6.65 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. a • TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-5 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE LOCATION Cascade Homes 4/8/03 ELEV. West Winds 4721.06 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 4.0 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC j >_ P % m o 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Many roots. Slightly plastic. 4720 • 2 CL-ML Silty clay. Light yellowish brown.Moist.Moderately o plastic. Moderate roots. VXX 4718 GP-GM Silty sandy gravel with moderate amount of 5"to 8"minus 4 cobbles. Saturated at 4.0 feet. 4716 6 4714 Total depth 7.5 feet. 8 4712 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -2.6 to 7.4 . HKM ENGINEERING, INC. 0 TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-6 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Wiridst 4721.32 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 3.0 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPH:IC11-1 _ P �0� o 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Many roots. Slightly plastic. CL-ML Silty clay. Light gray to yellowish brown.Moist. 4720 Moderately plastic. Moderate roots. • 2 4718 GP-GM Poorly graded silty sandy gravel with moderate amount of 5"to 8"minus cobbles. Saturated at 3.0 feet. 4 oil 4716 6 4714 Total depth 7.0 feet. 8 4712 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -3.48 to 6.52 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-7 PROJECT _ PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4734.68 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 8.5 When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y W USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC > >_ PC % m o 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Many 4734 roots. Slightly plastic. CL-ML Silty clay. Yellowish brown. Slightly moist to dry. • Moderately plastic. Moderate roots. 2 oo 4732 10 lo 4730 lo 6 GP-GM Poorly graded silty sandy gravel with few to moderate amount of 5"to 8"minus cobbles.Saturated at 8.5 feet. 4728 8 4726 Total depth 9.25 feet. • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -0.79 to 9.21 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-8 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4737.86 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 10.5 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Z USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE Y W pCf % DEPTH GRAPHIC m 0 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam. Medium to dark brown. Moist Many roots. Slightly plastic. lo Maximum density and optimum moisture. 101.7 20.4 LL-35 PL-17 • 4736 CL-ML Clayey silt. Medium brown to yellowish brown.Slightly 2 Xo moist.Many roots to 4 feet.Not plastic. oo o oo lo 4734 4 oo 00 4732 6 GP-GM Silty sandy gravel with moderate to few 6"minus cobbles. Saturated at 10.5 feet. 4730 8 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.63 toll.34 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-8 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4737.86 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 10.5 feet When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS =GRAPHIC w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH Z P �0 o 4728 10 • 4726 Total depth 11.5 feet. 12 4724 14 4722 16 4720 18 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC.monitoring pipe from -1.63 toll.34 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-9 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4738.57 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 9.0 When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH :GRAPHIC j >_ Pd % m o 0 CL-ML Top Soil. Silty clay loam Medium to dark brown. Moist 4738 Many roots. Slightly plastic. o CL-ML Clayey silt. Medium brown to yellowish brown.Slightly 107.4 18.0 moist.Many roots to 6.0 feet.Slightly plastic. • Maximum density and optimum moisture. 2 LL-31 PL-12 4736 VY lo 00 oo lo 4734 6 GP-GM Sandy gravel with moderate to many 3"to 6". Few 8"to 10"cobbles. Saturated at 9.0 feet. 4732 8 4730 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.13 to 8.87 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. TEST PIT LOG Test Pit No.: MW-9 PROJECT PROJECT NO. Cascade Homes Oak Street Properties 04S067.110 CLIENT DATE Cascade Homes 4/8/03 LOCATION ELEV. West Winds 4738.57 EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGER Cat 416B Extend A Hoe I Jim Potts DEPTH TO-Water: 9.0 When checked: Installation Caving: Yes SOIL SYMBOLS ELEVATION/ AND SAMPLERS Y w USCS DESCRIPTION DENSITY MOISTURE DEPTH GRAPHIC N >_ pcf m o 10 Total depth 9.5 feet. 4728 • 12 4726 14 4724 16 4722 18 4720 • Notes: Installed 3"perforated PVC monitoring pipe from -1.13 to 8.87 HKM ENGINEERING, INC. Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-1 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Cascade Homes HKM Engineering E PROJECT Oak Street Pro e West Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS LL in � z W.C. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 o a z W ADD TAi c� z w j a� PL i I LL v z m w U> W REMARKS w W OJ p K N VALUE ❑ BLOWs/Fr o Surface Elevation:4707.9 0 w o m z i i a� 1 to 20 30 40 12"Topsoil and organic matter ... 707 6 7 7 1 lsna ❑ ° as�io -4706.9. Lean clay(CL),stiff to soft, moist to very moist, brown to light brown 2.5 3 4705 2 1 2/18 2 11% ❑ 5 2 703. Clayey gravel (GC), compact to very dense,very 11 702. 0 13/18 moist to saturated, light brown to brown 3 72% 5 4700 14 10 23 697. 20 4 12/18 ❑ 67% 2.5 4695 14 27 24 5 6/18 81 15 33% 6 15.5 92. 692. Boring terminated at 15.5 feet Groundwater observed at 4 feet on 1/7/04 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, 7.5 sand pack to T, bentonite seal to 4', well stick-up of 2'encased with 4" PVC protective case. HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 H� 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406) 656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-3 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Cascade Homes HKM Engineering E PROJECT Oak Street Property West WindsSubdivision SAMPLES TESTS a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° Z a w W& PL Ir W.C. LL ADDITIONAL c� 0 a >W a _ _ z m w c0i? w w REMARKS a ¢ W 3 m wm Yg a W 0 m o 00 N VALUE O BLOWS/FT 0 Surface Elevation:4717.9 w o m z' i i °aer 10 20 30 40 10"Topsoil and organic matter ::: 717. 5 9 7 1 12/18 8 717.07 67% Lean clay(CL),stiff, moist, brown 5 01/1//,//I� s 2.5 5 715. 4715 8 2 8/�8 Silt(ML),stiff,slightly moist,light brown SH1 24/24 100% 5 5 712. 712. 12 24 Silty gravel (GM),very dense,slightly moist to 30 8/18 4 saturated, light brown 3 44% 5 4710 LZ 708. •�' 13 10 Poorly graded gravel with sand (GP), dense, % 35 5/18 saturated, dark brown ;: 707. 4 28% 2.5 �• ..' 4705 �a If• 6 15 At 13 r`: 702. 10 5 18/1�8 .;. 100/. r� 16.0 701. Boring terminated at 16 feet Groundwater observed at 9.2 feet on 1/7/04 7.5 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, sand pack to T, bentonite seal to 3', well stick-up of 2'encased with 4" PVC protective case. HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 H 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASSTDRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-5 Sheet 1 of 2 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Cascade Homes HKM Engineering E PROJECT Oak S Pro a West Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS U. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION It W W~ W W.C. ADDITIONAL o a >z a W PL —�--� LL DATA/ z to W U? w w REMARKS F a a w m wF x� W OJ j L)C N VALUE ❑ BLOWSIFT c Surface Elevation:4719.3 0 w o m z ?? a I- 10 20 30 40 ° 10"Topsoil and organic matter 3 4 5 1 14/18 8 718.47 ,+ 78% Lean clay(CL),firm,slightly moist to very moist, brown 717. 2.5 2 3 2 12/18 2 67% ❑ 4715 5 16 714. 20 5 Clayey gravel(GC),very dense,very moist to 19 13/18 saturated,dark brown 3 72% 712. 5 4710 5 709. •t' 12 14 10 Poorly graded gravel with sand(GP),dense, s•ti 17 11/18 saturated,dark brown �� 4 61% 707. 2.5 a= 4705 14 15 1929 2/18 5 11% 'r 16.0 4703.3. Boring terminated at 16 feet Groundwater observed at 5.4 feet on 1/7/04 7.5 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, sand pack to T, bentonite seal to the surface,well HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 HaV� ZZZ North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I N E E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASS'T DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GLInderhill Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-5 Sheet 2 of 2 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Cascade Homes HKM Engineering PROJECT O StreetWest Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS LL c9 co io K Z W.C. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION °°vz ADDITIONAL PL DTo >W w —ar O REMARKS _ ¢ w 3 m w� Y� mziao Z N VALUE p BLOWS/FT Elevation:4700.62 (9 a. o B stick-up of 2'encased with 4"PVC protective case. 20 2.5 25 7.5 30 2.5 35 HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 N 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 E N G I NE E R I N G Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASS'T DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill 19 Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-7 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Cascade Homes HKM Engineering E PROJECT 0 See Property West Winds Subdivision SAMPLES TESTS U. Izzis K Z H W.C. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION zo a >W a W PL I • i LL ADDITIONAL v REMARKS ~ Z N co w� 2 a W ? p 2 0 00 N VALUE ° BLOWSIFT o Surface Elevation:4727.9 0 w o m z' ?? a 10 20 30 40 ° 12"Topsoil and organic matter ::: 727. 3 4 3 1 14/18 ° 0 78% 726. Lean clay(CL),firm, moist to very moist,brown 2.5 2 4725 2 5 10/18 2 56% ° 5 14 723. ��. 19 5 Poorly graded gravel with sand and cobble(GP), 25 8/18 dense, moist to saturated, brown 722. 3 44% ° i' A 5 Al 4720 ti♦ 6 •� 12 10 w�i• 13 13/18 • � 717. 4 72% ° .L. 2.5 .. 4715 i. 'Kt• i :04 23 15 '� 50/ 5 2/11 A' 712. 5" 18% 15.5 --4712.4. Boring terminated at 15.5 feet Groundwater observed at 7.1 feet on 1/7/04 7.5 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, sand pack to 8', bentonite seal to the surface,well stick-up of 2'encased with 4"PVC protective Case. HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 H 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 ENGINEER ING Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASST DRILLER Sean Buck' Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill Project No.:4S067.110 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH-7 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER WECascade Homes HKM Engineering PROJECT Oak Street Pronerty WestSubdivision SAMPLES TESTS O LU LbIn MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 i W W W pL ILL ADDITIONAL v 0 a w a W DATA/ F = a w 3 W c0i>_ W W REMARKS m WK y� O N VALUE 0 BLOWS/FT a Z 2 �o 00 0 Surface Elevation:4727.9 0 w o m z ?? a r 1 10 20 30 40 ° 12"Topsoil and organic matter ;;; 727. 3 a 3 1 14/18 ° 78% 726. Lean clay(CL),firm,moist to very moist, brown 2.5 2 4725 2 5 10118 2 56% 5 723. A14 5 Poorly graded gravel with sand and cobble(GP), `• 19 •;. 25 8/18 dense,moist to saturated, brown N 722. 3 44% ° i' Y•� • w 5 ti• 4720 .y.j 6 10 ��� 12 ��. 13 13/18 • •y 717. 4 72% O ,7 .L� • 2.5 r�. 4715 .tip. i', 23 `� 50/ 2/11 15 • 712. 5• 5 18% 15.5 712. Boring terminated at 15.5 feet Groundwater observed at 7.1 feet on V7104 7.5 Monitor well installed at 15 feet with 5'screen, sand pack to 8',bentonite seal to the surface,well stick-up of 2'encased with 4"PVC protective case. HKM Engineering Inc. STARTED 12/19/03 FINISHED 12/19/03 H 222 North 32nd St. DRILL CO. Hansen DRILL RIG CME 55 Billings, MT 59101 ENGINEER ING Telephone: (406)656-6399 DRILLER Steve Hansen ASS'T DRILLER Sean Buck Fax: (406)656-6398 LOGGED BY NPeterson APPROVED BY GUnderhill • • Appendix B NRCS Soils Map Of Site NRCS Soils Data Reports • 542A j 57B III�iI I I 510B 509B I 50B 'K I I I I I I I ILrER LANE XTE LANE - NOR ARTS ALI _ BA IAR B ' � I I 4 i 5�7A i; I lln I 510B oQb !L=_J __� L_ � lil � W I it a ' I ' ;I; ) ';�,J� ►� I 510B I 53B ! �_ _ _ _ _ B_ _ -- ------- OAK REST L RTER/ALI---------- - _ - ---------- --_-------- - I -- 1 ----_- i - ------- i 1I 1 I CE ER OF S.2 111+510B I 111 50B I7A 1 I i I ! — — 1 , 1 1 ill � ❑'I _ III, LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y NO -IXJOm06 SILT AMsrERDAM S LOANat LOAM sae NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. o! - s g 5 �� 70 -TURNER 1DN' GALLA T/N COUNTY, MONTANA 70 -TUR LOAM N C i N!!R I N C 457A-TURNER LOAM,MODERATELY YET -N- 5M-ENBAR LRAM KM Engineering Inc. 510e -MEADOwcREEK LOAM McChesney Professional Bldg. 511A -FAIRWAY SILT LOAM NRCS SOIL MAP b601 NiMes Dr.,Suite 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)58"834 2w D 2w FIGURE 5.3 FAX 1406)586-1730 Kd� } DATE JAN.1%2M PRMM NIX 015067.110 a Copt 0 2DO3 N101 Engineer"In4 N Rights Revery& • • Non-Technical Descriptions Y+ Gallatin County Area,Montana Only those map units that have entries for the selected non-technical description categories are included in this report. Map Unit: 53B - Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Description Category: Sol AMSTERDAM SILT LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-4 PERCENT.LANDFORM.RELICT STREAM TERRACES;FROST FREE DAYS.90-110,AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES:10.0- 11.8,MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS.NONE,LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE:CROPLAND,RANGELAND. Map Unit: 510E - Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Description Category: Sol MEADOWCREEK LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-4 PERCENT. LANDFORM:STREAM TERRACES;FROST FREE DAYS:90-110,AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES.4.5-5.4,MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS:WATER TABLE,LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE.,CROPLAND,RANGELAND. Map Unit: 511A - Fairway silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes w Description Category: Sol FAIRWAY SILT LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-2 PERCENT. LANDFORM.STREAM TERRACES,FROST FREE DAYS:90-110,AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES:8.1-10.1,MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS:WATER TABLE;LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE.CROPLAND,RANGELAND, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 • Hydric Soils List • Gallatin County Area,Montana Hydric Soils Criteria Map Symbol and Component Hydric Local Landform Hydric Meets Meets Meets Acres Map Unit Name . Criteria Saturation Flooding Ponding Code Criteria Criteria Criteria 536: Amsterdam silt loam,0 to 4 Amsterdam No Stream Terrace — — — -- 6,660 percent slopes 51 OB: Meadowcreek loam,0 to 4 Meadowcreek No Stream Terrace — — — — 5,233 percent slopes 511A: Fairway silt loam,0 to 2 Fairway No Stream Terrace — — — — 2,296 percent slopes • • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Soil Map Legend • Gallatin County Area,Montana Map Soil Name Symbol 53B Amsterdam silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes 510E Meadowcreek loam,0 to 4 percent slopes 511A Fairway silt loam,0 to 2 percent slopes • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 • Table ENG-1. - Construction Materials • Gallatin County Area,Montana The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.00 to 0.99. The greater the value,the greater the likelihood that the bottom layer or thickest layer of the soil is a source of sand or gravel. Potential Source Potential Source Pct of Gravel of Sand Map Symbol of and Soil Name Map Unit Rating Class and Rating Class and Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value 536: Amsterdam 85 Poor Poor Bottom layer 0.00 Bottom layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 51 OB: Meadowcreek 85 Fair Fair Thickest layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 Bottom layer 0.38 Bottom layer 0.86 511A: Fairway 85 Poor Fair Thickest layer 0.00 Thickest layer 0.00 Bottom layer 0.00 Bottom layer 0.86 • • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 • • Table ENG-2. - Construction Materials • Gallatin County Area,Montana The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.00 to 0.99. The smaller the value,the greater the limitation. Potential Source Potential Source Potential Source Map Symbol Pct of Reclaimation Material of Roadfill of Topsoil of and Soil Name Map Rating Class and Rating Class and Rating Class and Unit Va lue Value Value Limiting Features Limiting Features Limiting Features 5313: Amsterdam 85 Fair Good Fair Carbonate content 0.68 Carbonate content 0.68 Low content of organic 0.88 matter Water erosion 0.90 51 OB: Meadowcreek 85 Fair Fair Poor Low content of organic 0.13 Depth to saturated 0.98 Hard to reclaim 0.00 matter zone Depth to saturated 0.98 Droughty 0.86 zone No water erosion 0.99 No rock fragments >0.99 limitation 511A: airway 85 Fair Fair Fair No water erosion 0.99 Depth to saturated 0.98 Hard to reclaim 0.68 limitation zone Depth to saturated 0.98 zone USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table ENG-3. - Building Site Development • Gallatin County Area,Montana The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition,but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in this report are limited to the top 5 limitations. Additional limitations may exist. Dwellings without Dwellings with Small Commercial Map Symbol Pct Basements Basements Buildings of and Soil Name Map Rating Class and Rating Class and Rating Class and Unit Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value 53B: Amsterdam 85 Not limited Not limited Not limited 51OB: Meadowcreek 85 Not limited Somewhat limited Not limited Depth to saturated 0.99 zone 511A: Fairway 85 Not limited Somewhat limited Not limited Depth to saturated 0.99 zone • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 0 • Table ENG-4. - Building Site Development • Gallatin County Area,Montana The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition,but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in this report are limited to the top 5 limitations. Additional limitations may exist. Local Roads Shallow Lawns and Map Symbol Pct and Streets Excavations Landscaping of and Soil Name Map Rating Class and Rating Class and Rating Class and Unit Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value 5313: Amsterdam 85 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Not limited Frost action 0.50 Cutbanks cave 0.10 51 OB: Meadowcreek 85 Very limited Very limited Not limited Frost action 1.00 Cutbanks cave 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.99 zone 511A: Fairway 85 Very limited Very limited Not limited Frost action 1.00 Cutbanks cave 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.99 zone • • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22102 Page 1 of 1 • • Table ENG-5. - Sanitary Facilities . Gallatin County Area,Montana The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition,but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in this report are limited to the top 5 limitations. Additional limitations may exist. Septic Tank Sewage Map Symbol Pct Absorption Fields Lagoons Of and Soil Name Map Rating Class and Rating Class and Unit Limiting Features Value Limiting Features Value 5313: Amsterdam 85 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Restricted permeability 0.50 Seepage 0.50 Slope <0.01 51OB: Meadowcreek 85 Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 1.00 Seepage 1.00 zone Depth to saturated 1.00 Filtering capacity 1.00 zone Restricted permeability 0.50 Slope <0.01 511A: Fairway 85 Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 1.00 Seepage 1.00 • zone Depth to saturated 1.00 Filtering capacity 1.00 zone Restricted permeability 0.50 • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 • • • Table H. - Engineering Index Properties Gallatin County Area,Montana Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated. Classification Fragments Percent Passing Sieve Number Map Symbol Liquid Plasticity and Soil Name Depth USDA Texture >10 3-10 Limit Index Unified AASHTO Inches Inches 4 10 40 200.. In Pct Pct Pct 536: Amsterdam 0-8 Silt Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 75-95 25-30 5-10 8-15 Silt Loam CL A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-95 25-35 5-15 Very Fine Sandy Loam CL-ML A-6 Silty Clay Loam 15-42 Silt Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 Very Fine Sandy Loam 42-60 Silt Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 70-90 20-30 NP-10 Very Fine Sandy Loam ML 510B: Meadowcreek 0-11 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 50-75 20-30 5-10 11-25 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 95-100 90-100 70-90 40-75 20-30 5-10 Sandy Loam SC-SM Silt Loam 25-60 Very Gravelly Sand GP A-1 -- 0-10 25-45 15-35 10-25 0-10 — NP Extremely Gravelly Sand GP-GM Very Gravelly Loamy Sand 511A: �. Fairway 0-15 Silt Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 90-100 70-90 20-30 5-10 15:46 Silty Clay Loam CL A-4 0 0 100 100 85-100 60-90 25-40 5-15 Silt Loam CL-ML A-6 Loam 46-60 Very Gravelly Sand GP-GM A-1 0 0-10 40-100 30-100 20-60 0-15 — NP Gravelly Loamy Sand SM A-2 Sand SP SP-SM USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table A a. - Physical Properties of the Soils Gallatin County Area, Montana Entries under"Erosion Factors—T'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated. Moist Saturated Available Linear Erosion Factors Wind Wind Map Symbol Organic Erodi- Erodi- and Soil Name Depth Sand Silt Clay Bulk Hydraulic Water Extensi- Matter Kw Kf T bility bility Density Conductivity Capacity bility Group Index In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec In/in Pct Pct 5313: Amsterdam 0-8 — -- 20-27 1.10-1.30 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-4.0 .32 .32 5 6 48 8-15 -- — 18-30 1.20-1.40 1.40-4.00 0.17-0.20 0.0-2.9 1.0-2.0 .43 .43 15-42 — — 18-27 1.25-1.45 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 42-60 — — 10-20 1.25-1.50 4.00-14.00 0.17-0.19 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .43 .43 510B: Meadowcreek 0-11 — — 18-25 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-5.0 .37 .37 3 5 56 11-25 -- — 18-25 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.13-0.15 0.0-2.9 1.0-3.0 .37 .37 25-60 — — 0-5 1.20-1.50 141.00 0.02-0.03 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .05 .20 511A: Fairway 0-15 — — 15-27 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.22 0.0-2.9 2.0-5.0 .28 .28 4 4L 86 15-46 — — 18-30 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 1.0-2.0 .37 .37 46-60 — -- 0-10 1.20-1.50 42.00-141.00 0.03-0.04 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .10 .20 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 • • • Table A b. - Physical Properties of the Soils Gallatin County Area,Montana Entries under"Erosion Factors-r'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated. Moist Available Linear Erosion Factors Wind Wind Map Symbol Permeability Organic Erodi- Erodi- and Soil Name Depth Sand Silt Clay Bulk (Ksat) Water Extensi- Matter Kw Kf T bility bility Density Capacity bility Group Index In Pct Pct Pct g/cc In/Hr In/In Pct Pct 536: Amsterdam 0-8 — -- 20-27 1.10-1.30 0.6-2 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-4.0 .32 .32 5 6 48 8-15 — — 18-30 1.20-1.40 0.2-0.6 0.17-0.20 0.0-2.9 1.0-2.0 .43 .43 15-42 — — 18-27 1.25-1.45 0.6-2 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 42-60 — — 10-20 1.25-1.50 0.6-2 0.17-0.19 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .43 .43 51 OB: Meadowcreek 0-11 — — 18-25 1.20-1.40 0.6-2 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-5.0 .37 .37 3 5 56 11-25 -- — 18-25 1.20-1.40 0.6-2 0.13-0.15 0.0-2.9 1.0-3.0 .37 .37 25-60 — — 0-5 1.20-1.50 20 0.02-0.03 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .05 .20 511A: Fairway 0-15 — — 15-27 1.20-1.40 0.6-2 0.18-0.22 0.0-2.9 2.0-5.0 .28 .28 4 4L 86 15-46 -- — 18-30 1.20-1.40 0.6-2 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 1.0-2.0 .37 .37 46-60 — — 0-10 1.20-1.50 6-20 0.03-0.04 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .10 .20 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table J2. - Chemical Properties of the Soils • Gallatin County Area,Montana Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated. Cation Effective Calcium Sodium Map Symbol Depth Exchange Cation Soil Carbon- Gypsym Salinity Adsorp- and Soil Name Capacity Exchange Reaction ate tion Capacity Ratio In meq/100 g meq/100 g pH Pct Pct mmhos/cm 5313: Amsterdam 0-8 15-20 — 6.6-7.3 0 — — — 8-15 15-20 — 6.6-7.8 0 — — — 15-42 15-20 — 7.9-8.4 15-35 0 0.0 0 42-60 10-15 — 7.9-8.4 0 — 0.0-2.0 — 51 OB: Meadowcreek 0-11 20-25 — 6.6-8.4 0 — 0.0-3.0 — 11-25 15-20 — 6.6-7.8 0 — 0.0-3.0 — 25-60 1.0-5.0 — 6.1-1.8 0 — 0.0-3.0 — 511A: Fairway 0-15 15-20 — 7.4-8.4 5-15 — 0.0-3.0 — 15-46 10-20 — 7.4-8.4 5-15 - 0.0-3.0 — 46-60 1.0-5.0 — 6.6-7.8 5-15 — 0.073.0 — • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date:1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 • • • Table K1. - Water Features Gallatin County Area, Montana Depths of layers are in feet. Estimates of the frequency of ponding and flooding apply to the whole year rather than to individual months. Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern or that data were not estimated. Water Table Ponding Flooding Map Symbol Hydrologic and Soil Name Group Month Upper Lower Surface Duration Frequency Duration Frequency Limit Limit Depth Ft Ft Ft 5313: • Amsterdam B Jan-Dec — — None — None 51 OB: Meadowcreek C April 2.0-3.5 >6.0 — — None — None May 2.0-3.5 >6.0 — — None — None June 2.0-3.5 >6.0 — — None — None 511A: Fairway C April 2.0-3.5 >6.0 — — None — None May 2.0-3.5 >6.0 — — None — None June 2.0-3.5 >6.0 — — None — None USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 Table K2. - Soil Features Gallatin County Area, Montana Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern or that data were not estimated. Map Symbol Restrictive Layer Subsidence Potential Risk of Corrosion and Soil Name for Frost Depth Action Uncoated Concrete Kind to Top Thickness Hardness Initial Total Steel In In In In 536: Amsterdam — — -- — — — Moderate High Low 510B: Meadowcreek — -- — — 0 — High Moderate Low 511A: Fairway -- — --- — — — High High Low USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 •. • • Table U. - Windbreaks and Environmental Plantings Gallatin County Area, Montana Absence of an entry indicates that trees generally do not grow to the given height. Map Symbol Trees Having Predicted 20 Year Average Height Of and Soil Name <=8 ft >8 and<= 15 ft. > 15 and<=25 ft. >25 and<=35 ft. >35 ft. 53B: Amsterdam Skunkbush Sumac Common Chokecherry Blue Spruce — — Westem Sandcherry Common Lilac Green Ash • Rocky Mountain Juniper Ponderosa Pine Siberian Peashrub Russian Olive Tatarian Honeysuckle Siberian Elm 510B: Meadowcreek Purpleosier Willow Common Chokecherry Blue Spruce Golden Willow Plains Cottonwood Western Sandcherry Common Lilac Ponderosa Pine Siberian Elm Rocky Mountain Juniper Russian Olive Siberian Crabapple 511A: Fairway Purpleosier Willow Common Chokecherry Blue Spruce Golden Willow Plains Cottonwood Western Sandcherry Common Lilac Green Ash Ponderosa Pine Rocky Mountain Juniper Russian Olive Siberian Crabapple a USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Distribution Generation Date: 1/22/02 Page 1 of 1 • Appendix C Adjoining Groundwater Well Report Adjoining Groundwater Well Map Ground-Water•Information Center ,. 2/27/2004 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. ' .Sign Out • Montana Tech of The University of Montana a i 1300;West Park Street.-VA M Hall 322. ��- Lx Butte Montana�59701=899R ' ''�•" � � o•. r ./ '+s; Home [Well Data I Message Boards i.Reports'j•DrillerWeb fDNRC Help! MbmgGwic Navigation: I Main'Menu l:SWL:Menu l--GWCP Map P.'roducts('MBMG'Proiects i ; . I Ground Water Information Center Wells Report The following data were returned from the GW IC databases for the area you requested. For a more detailed description of the data view the GWIC Metadata report. If you notice data entry errors or have questions please let us know by clicking here to leave us a message. If you wish to view a one page report for a particular site, click the hyperlinked Gwic Id for that well. Scroll to the right of your screen to view all the data. +Retrieval,statistics Field Max 'Min Count Avg Filter Options Total Depth 236.00 15.00 62 -79.76 Pumping Water Level 226.00 10:00 _ 43 55.42 Td F1�— Static•Water Level 45.00 2.00 59 .13:67 Yield m 750.00 6.00 61 79.07 filter reporf� �9P ) 3r . These statistics do not,take any geographic,topographic,or.geologic factors into, -= comiderationAegative swl values are reportedfor water levels that are above land. surface. r• • ic, NR Site ame :" `ocatiorrc- e�M Pwh Sw field ate " � s :- 171831 GROPE BRUCE&�';01 S05E34AD� NO f W ELL�97 00 ;K�t f 2 00100 00 1/13/1999 DOMESTIC I..�7`.x � "'''_`'_,;.vxl:At1RA" ..' ,ra, ?.;-_'1.� .: r,�a. /;^.r. �:� !'�.�s s..:/'�,-c^_C"'•":l,,:. G.?r;;w' .,..��.-..,,�,.�e'�" x•.:.!.�t:;i a123957 LE CLAIR KEN w101S05E34B ,i NO uWELL120.00,110.0037:00 23.00�10/29/,199_ODOMESTICrY Cam,,,,, „s�,,.L�a 120300 5�- " PETERSON PAUL ?O1 S05E34B,; ;`,NO`'WELL.114 00 :70.00 40.00`25.0010%24%1989DOMESTlC;L y _ _ E91874 ;rA.* PETERSONPAULq. 01S05E34B 'NO WELL 135.00,115.0042.00 ,20.00r,9/9%1982DOMESTICa 1°' r _ _. ✓, ,tip,, w- 91873}' WESTLAKE MYRON 01 S05E34B 'NO W ELL�'15 00 '"; ��3:00 28 00' 1/1%1880 DOMESTIC rw 2 f '; S S I`;,: L x '�.n�.•, F"'- sue: ,.��•.a...�.`..1��...,.4.,...,r..:�r'�i(VI&AN NA k.e:w......-',^.5 r .ar i � s � s �1 .rt��::d, �� �.i ns -.._�_—,-_-65*""" ....,,..�.:- _._,._...,a,...-.. a ... `-- -._ ,.... __ _ �'� +TILLETTDOUG ; 01S05E34BBNC1; WELL20000800045.001'14:00 I t �x_,.9,- - � I. — 91876 60759,COK'MIKE "' 01S05E34BCJ.0 WELL132.O0f58.0038.00F0A010/22%1985DOMESTIC.'°rLV -: .91877 DANH ,_IBERNARDk01S05E34C,&TONCP 'WELL,200 00 12 00 _ %33 00 1%19531RRIGATION ' DANFiOFBERNARD' 01S05E34CNCiWELLL2200120020.00 %1/1895D'OMESTIC � , ` .. 8 9." 995WEAVERCHARLES 01S05E34CAA�NO SWELL'r5160f300021'OOP50.0010/29/1973DOMESTIC 168691 ;Ny K` VAN BEEK MARK OR 01 S05E34CBir NO` R',7/1/1998 DOMESTIC�r��-?g R� DARCY� caain irk,. rr _ __ rr d z r:. a, tr ,zr ui r k44'si 2Q4384M�MjKINGMAaTOM�,_ P$�_ig01S05E34CBBCNC 'WELL`•r'4600Wxn2400-20'.00�a6/4/2003DOMESTI(�z''?z.: `�sy 91880 DANHOF ANDREWB 01 S05E34CC NO?'WELL' 39.00',18 00.13 00 g 32.007/20/1966 DOMESTIC, sax - M 208330. e MEADOWS BAXTER�01 S05E34DC F+NO;t y W ELL'Y 98 00 t 10 00 F 5000 �10/8�2003 IRRIGATION�' .�� `! 3 91881 r STSMSON CARL"� }`011Sr05E34DCsz NO=,WELLiw8 00 58 0012 OO1,30 0011/23/1970DOMESTIC;;ti. *— . i &":-�xzYff s=:` aWl- .. +�-a6m s . ' *hw -.r, ; { STOCKWATER,x 91882 >'•;t�,V LEWI 61 S05E34DCA N0 WELL 45 50 20.00 r 4 00�„r30.00 8/14/11973 DOMESTICI �" s fir` 171832 GALLATIN CENTER01S05E3 NO` WELL`C90 00' "' s 12 00"4500 ' 2/1119991RRIGATIO'N ,7 F"� 3_ zs,�'7� z�a.,- *-'..F � TY,e�..r .4.�'a `t .� *.� ; _ �€ .,+ z.. s ,P . z 1 � p M..�r:s �1 1t t•Y•:.v,�,'`ryr a fI LIMITED, y PARTNERSHIP•__ t.' {` 91886 �ti9574M ILLER RICHARD L; NO 01S05E35 'r WELL"39.50;21'.00;;6.00 .25.00'�,9/2/1976DOMESTIC pis r� 91885 '- ,REINERTOM +. ?`_ _0 S05E35• . WELL45.60 N 46LL09884[� i SECORJAMES D'rJ'0_1 S05E35 3100;600+25.00F5/2/1983DOMESTIC'� ' ;t -r�+ 5'00,25 006/8/1972 DOMESTIC ';�' t �0 - - f;91883 WALISER STEVE R 01 S05E35p, NO' W ELL'x 39 00.t14 00r'4 00 20 00 r 5/2/1973 DOMESTICS` rx • 176271 GALLATIN CENTER 01S05E35A NO WELL 80.00 10.00 45.00 7/16/1999 LIMITED 207675 POB MONTGOMERY 01S05E35A NO WELL 78.50 15.00 37.00 9/18/2003DOMESTIC AND CO'EAST IRRIGATION WELL 208240 POB MONTGOMERY 01S05E35A NO WELL 56.00 10.00 37.00 9/17/2003IRRIGATION AND CO'WEST WELL 191773 GALLATIN CENTER 01S05E35AA NO WELL 95.00 15.00 75.00 9/20/2001 IRRIGATION LIMITED PART 155039 BOZEMAN NORTH 01S05E35AAC NO WELL 118.00 30.90 12.50 122.00 12/10/1995 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY 19TH VISITOR CENTER 1718.33 VALLEY CENTERE O1S05E35AB NO WELL 236.00 226.0015.00 200.00 8/24/1998DOMESTIC ENTERPRISES '1'S9588 PRICE COSTCO, 01S05E35ABB NO WELL 89.50 89.00 8.30 22.0011/27/1996MONITORING ',X092'02 100708 PRICE COSTCO O1S05E35ABB NO WELL162.00 60.00 7.00240.00 517/1997 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY R 61 21 5 PRICE COSTCO' 01S05E35ABB NO WELL202.00120.00 6.00700.00 5/14/1997 FIRE PROTECTION FIRE WELL#3 159590 PRICE COSTCO' 0lS05E35ABB NO WELL 27.00 25.00 5.67 10.00 12/4/1996MONITORING MONITOR WELL#1 159591 PRICE COSTCO' 01S05E35ABB NO WELL 25.00 24.00 6.50 6.00 12/3/1996MONITORING MONITOR WELL#2 162167 PRICE COSTCO INC 01S05E35ABB NO WELL195.00139.00 6.50500.00 3/27/1997 FIRE PROTECTION 162169 PRICE COSTCO INC 01S05E35ABB NO WELL225.00149.50 9.50500.00 4/30/1997 FIRE PROTECTION 200090 POB MONTGOMERY 01 S05E35ABCD NO WELL 58.67 12.50 35.0010/15/2002IRRIGATION 184455 FIRST INTERSTATE 01SO5E35ADB NO WELL 60.00 14.00 35.00 8/21/2000IRRIGATION BANK • 91887 DANIS LYLE H' 01S05E3513 NO WELL 55.00 20.00 50.00 1/l/l890STOCKWATER WELL A 91888 DANIS LYLE H' 01S05E35B NO WELL 25.00 20.00750.00 1/l/1950IRRIGATION WELL B 208734 SANDAN,LLC 01S05E35BB NO WELL 94.00 9.00 45.00 7123/2003IRRIGATION 208735 SANDAN,LLC 01SO5E35BC NO WELL 77.00 19.00 45.00 7/24/2003IRRIGATION 149157 93745 DAVIS BOB 01SO5E35BCC NO WELL 56.00 51.0020.00 40.0012/12/1994DOMESTIC 205728 WARBLER 01SO5E35BD NO WELL 76.00 23.00 30.00 7125/2003IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT 91889 FREDRICKS BOB 01S05E35C NO WELL 35.00 10.00 2.00 30.00 1/24/1978DOMESTIC 3 133261 84063 MUSSER RICHARD 01S05E35C NO WELL 38.50 33.00 4.50 25.00 8/27/1992 ERICK 91890 JEROME GALE 0lS05E35CA NO WELL 45.50 45.5012.00 30.0010/14/1971 DOMESTIC 130163 SCHEER ALFRED 01S05E35CAAB YES WELL 67.00 18.88 13.30 DOMESTIC 91891 99364 HARVEY ARTHUR R 0lS05E35CBB NO WELL 83.50 35.00 5.00 20.00 9/7/1972 DOMESTIC 91893 BREKKE L J 01S05E35CC NO WELL 46.10 10.00 5.00 40.00 9/8/1981 Z 91892 31114 DRUMMOND JAMES 01S05E35CC NO WELL 55.00 21.00 7.20 40.00 12/6/1980 Z &ELIZABETH 91895 PETERSON WILLIAM 01S05E35CCi NO WELL 40.00 13.00 8.00 30.0010/14/1971 DOMESTIC -Z R&DIANNE 91894 ROGERS BEN W& 01S05E35CC NO WELL 53.00 53.00 6.00 40.00 10/l/1970 DOMESTIC Z DIANE E 91896 DEAN MIKE 01SO5E35CCB NO WELL 50.00 30.00 5.00 30.0010/23/1970DOMESTIC l 91897 10474 DEHAAN ARNOLD 01S05E35CD NO WELL 54.06 54.00 6,00 20.00 9/30/1974DOMESTIC 133197 DERZAYMICHAEL 01S05E35CD NO WELL 38.00 30.00 4.00 50.00 7/21/1992DOMESTIC �{ 91898 SECORTHOMA,SW 01S05E35CD NO WELL 47.00 47.00 4.00 36.00 4/26/1970DOMESTIC t� &COLLEEN R 1 162187 BOZEMAN SOLVENT 01S05E35DA NO WELL 31,00 8/21/1996UNUSED • SITE-M-34 171834 KELLER SUPPLY 01 S05E35DA NO WELL 40.00 25.00 6.00 20.00 3/26/1999 DOMESTIC 91899 ROLFE&WOOD INC 01S05E35DA NO WELL 65.00 1100 45.00 1/l/1912DOMESTIC V • .168692C104756-00INTERMOUNTAIN 01S05E35DAA1 NO ..WELL 80.00 80.00.25.00 .40:00 9/21/1998DOMESTIC PROCUCE 129930 81881 ANTHONY WAYNE 01S05E35DAD NO WELL 131.00110.0030.00 30.0011/12/1991 DOMESTIC CORP 129931' 80661 ANTHONY WAYNE: 01S05E35DAD NO WELL 85.00 76.0026.00 30.0011/11/1991 DOMESTIC CORPORATION,,' 168693P104756-000SPOSTAL 01S05E35DC NO , WELL 99.00. 6400 5.50'80.00 7/22/1997DOMESTIC SERVICE 176272 ..UNITED POSTAL 01S05E35DDD NO WELL -10/19/1999. SERVICE(U End of Report. 63 record(s)listed. This report is restricted to site types of WELL,BOREHOLE,SPRING,and COAL BED METHANE WELL. Explanation of Columns: Td=Total depth of well in feet below ground Pwl=Pumping water level in feet below ground Swl=Static water level in feet above/below ground-Negative values are reported for water levels that are above land surface. Yield=Yield in gallons per minute Date=Completion date of welllborehole Use=Reported use of water Ver?=Was location verified? The preceding materials represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval.The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user at the time and date of the retrieval.Retransmission of the data • to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Ground-Water Information Center Online 1998-2004 Staff I Privacy Statement • • d v • . u Ground-Water Information 2/27/2004 E. .Montana.Bureau,of Mines and Geology rc` � , s "r' Sign Out r. 4 Montana Tech of The.University'of Montana. ' IC 1300 West Park Street-Main'Hall 322 - `` ���'. �.� '�,-' ;, ..=s ' - �•� 4 M' b i utte Montana 59701-8997 i, r < < I Home I,Well,Data`I Message Boards.I'Rgports I DrillerWeb I DNRC Help!' MbmgGwic Navigatiori:.1 Main,Menu ISWL Menu I GW P MaplProducts,I MBMG Proiectsli s f Ground Water Information Center Wells Report The following data were returned from the GW IC databases for the area you requested. For a more detailed description of the data view the GWIC Metadata report. If you notice data entry errors or have questions please let us know by clicking here to leave us a message. If you wish to view a one page report for a particular site, click the hyperlinked Gwic Id for that well.Scroll to the right of your screen to view all the data. Retrieval Statistics"' ' Field: Max `Min Count s` Avg s F!Ifer Options Total Depth 4 165.00, 10 20' 32 4- 52.99 Pumping Water Level 55.00' 13:00 12' 34'33 Static Water.Level 41.00; 1.00 , 30 11.91 a, ar• 'r.''e Yield(gprn) 450i00 1.00 30 55.90 fltgr report, These statistics do not take any geographic,topographic,or,geologic factors into consideration.Negative swl values are ieported for water levels;that are above larid surface: Site' ame:_- ocatiomy' eP -Type Pw[- 0 field ••. ate se r� `. -95ti09 �r, t ' SMITHsSHERMAN B&'GRACE R 02S05EO s�1NOz?1NELL" '' 165 6-6 y4i2 00450 00��1/,1/1952DOMESTIC�,- .S rf xr:' n �.` v� r am _ ti' _ `,k, �� 1 � �g o '" ,;STOCKWATER ) E99611 ; SMITH;VIIILBUI2'EWEL'L°#1 ', 02S05E02 � tNOWEL'L zr a60.00'iz` 2000 .1 00�1%1�,1885DOMESTICA4 $� V F� ����f�.:...��i�'r1:*-i'-�- ,.-i"�F'"'�"V•h�r+t•'•;-r v i+' 'ei, � .-�!x •r � v ; ,�,� 4 7 �s r, rvx: ry 4 3 7 f "'STQCKWATER� '�.w�a..:Y»w.-. ..w'�.s��.+" ;+:.;4:Ct.......:i a�``��..._'L3'...-....,�, � .:�t�f .•.lr,.:.r �T�--4.:t^.:�"� �s?L.u'Y wJ^�wr"�..;'��•.i,''.��. _ _ SNITH WILBUR E*WELL#2 '02S05E02 3N0 rWELL' �30 00:` 115 00 1'0(r 1/1/1868DOMESTIC 4x r3t�; x $TOCKVI►ATER I .wt;3:.a :ram,.�1~.�,• ..:3«f}...u•.:i',Jx.i::7 . .;at.'•x. 9 '.,,.;�cf:�.[:,, .:.s:: 4 .e,a+r•??:.,..�. .s-. „ iyx'V..c,n Yti u, �L> y1�5`•7b'$'' n..3.RT„i.A�' �95610 'VANDERWALL MARTIN&ANNE 02S05E02AA jj,x►JO "WELD" �}12 00�;; � 12.00;�«10 00 ; _ DOMESTIC{ '176543 ,,_ AMUNRUD BRENT&BRENDW{ 02S05E02 Bi ;1`- WELL, ;,, 87.00,r_;,r 41.00 2 OOt 6/11/1999DOMESTIC r,. _5 xw^a cis -e —-_ _ � r _ _ M 149402��.��r x}�BOZEMAN SOLVENT SITE*M 19* 02S05E02AC N0:;'WELD r 10.20 � •+2 90 ''7/28/1993 MONITORING ut*cay*t,:Am—m ,i t(1fL. ,g,Es tt t..:•� 2"i7Z:c ..s.".+..tt~:57 F' `�r:,,' :'K. i..� A PT M:i'J4�.'t'Yb''u' Y•1.5:l . _.•.,.e..�,...w,........:.....,..,..— .'$=' ;+w..«y''" ' "'-",�'f.......j �...,........, •. :179809C110118OOROSEPARKLLC, �a. 02S05E02ACKNOWEL�L� 39,005'50�5 0010/11/1999iIRRIGATIQN 207369 GARRITY SHAWwHOME3 INC ' a02S05E02A,D jNO@ LL r;r 59.0050 00 6.00.8 5 00;10%12/1988JRRIGATION f w,1 95' 633 'ARCADIA GARDENS LLP � = t02S05E026AD N SWELL' ,.;��� 566A 8.00,FOO Q 19/5/,19961RRIGATIONrA I 159634 ARCADIWGARDENS LLP' g'x ` 02S05E02BAb-A.K IWELL "`r N:0045 00~ } ���� �_�_ ..• � ,� � s��..... ;1000�3500 ,9%4/19961RRIGATIOtVg- 1 205803 `,� GRAVESJOHNANDSUZANNA '02S05E02CABCNOWELL ;e`r385Q800 OOOzry8/6120031RRIGAT►ONE �Z �_.. _ - _i 179810C110107-00HOMELANDDEVELO_PMENI ;102S05E02CDCgiNO ?WELL 4ta39,00t' ' 12'50�50 00 10/1211999 1RRIGATIONi' ..� 1 fi 7, "' ;TUDORCLIFF ;w �02S05E02CDCBNO. WELL `,, .� 5833� ;•,,14:OOr80008/9/2002112RIGATION = � 056 fit BRENTWOOD SUBDIVISION ` 4"02S05E02D�-, �NO WELL` s 60.00 55 00N 00.�7500 9/26/,1997IRRIGATION s' 11HOA _ Y " t!fi .., _ '^ ROSE PARK HOLDING LLC#1 402S05E02DBA6 N0*VIIELL ' ` �395Q^ m5.50 '50 001 /011%1999IRRIGATION 179812THOMAS E ELOPMENT�COa02S05E02DBBB NO sWELL�'+``iz40.00;? ! 8'80,x3500.,10/27119991RRIGATION t0 - R.. 176544 ` x fSIv11TH ROGER ,� 02S05E02DC NO ;WV E d�xc a 5850 "t. + '1000Of 5%17/1999DOMESTIC " 177112 C107611700 SMITH ROGER ,, rF'02S05E02DCDj NO,�,,W ELL� ~s 58.50 ?"� y y 100 00±b/17/1999DOMESTIC }! 17264 '78763FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST.CHURCH 02S05E0 D NO =WELLf"�< '�'�rr ;�s" �-„�59 50 22 00 12 50�75 00 7/2/1991 IRRIGATION �- t�.95613t_ f �SCHULTZJOHNLAWRENCE �r±02S05E02DD•„ iNO�:WELL,,.. ;39.0026.00;10.00 3000K;,2/9/1968DOMESTIC i 5614 , E` ,SMITH WILBUR E' ,; T ar' 02S05E02DD NOh WELL 'r`r�47:0021:00�14�0_Os20 00 1/20/1967DOMESTIC 202633+g � . -DMC:CONSTRUCTION�,,s „;, 02S05E02DDA_NO ;WELLt `��78.50sa; ;1 0 4 00 0 5/10/20031RRIGATION 14055111,.;s�+ R DEPT.OF HWYS��4 85 93',MDT,02S05E02DDD�1 NOr BOREHOLE:32350 f 18 20 t . 12/13/1993 GEOTECH r ; L.r'�;�:H� -ii�.Y'�r?� - s:..���<s�_'ae"�i..':.t2�etnaix�.Y..�,..�.+i`f�.fiv6:r•....T �_,...z yy]r}.,-•� 4 tq. .[ - �f={na��' ..........n..�,e:o..:cGs•:.:e-.,,.�y.:...::;{:::,.:,._.:..:...:..... .:�_:�=•L"7.O o�Ti:m }, :-.r.�...x:. r.. .. c.r........ _...>:..s...v.,,n.....y...................,..<.............7: .f_5._._,.+. �......:a.; ...��St� `)'fF:. ,,:-=2:y: 'N! - 956,1'5 r • ITE EDNA�TRACE RANCH::.. :;;02S05E03Ay NO WELL 45'0023 00 t8 50 30 00�3/22/19681)OMESTIGI: ._..,.w ............ .......•... .....-...._J. - .w...._..:..i.. ..:.,. ... — .:.:jY: W� -.•4 •T ..).: ...-..;.ar.:v.:::,{.;1.::.._,,.a.....:..vt•:f.+':,:.::w...:-::.-•.+,,....,✓�.:,,�..:f,.i�5:-.:.:•..r'.:..,_...a.i L.. :._.:..., NO , ' ' • , 4.!0.:,.,..0. ....... 0�:•�/2�w8/R WT .....ii:.'x,;,l7r;;1 200J2.,1RR.I.rG•.yA.:�T3-I•O_•,rNt:.. z956.1.6� SMITHWItBURfE t,�, 02S05E03C 4,,`�';NO; `WELD. 45:00.,,.. " 20`00 ._.1,:00.;,.1l1/1874DOMESTIC - ��rs:. ;.,�lX•k`i�?(!:t 'li'{:!J!d y (.3; Sv .tY• c�l y ;... T .J'fu.:_z..,�._.__...,.,.....,.e._n -�._.r ,-...,�_.._.,,..... ., Asa.:.:,:• -:�r...aar..._.,r+•c::,..t::_' ic:a:.. - -,r.,_.....�...,...._._:z.:_.. L::.':r�o..Hr-' .•..........�':.CSa.o... 4eJ...7....._. 3...:......,._ ...... :s. ,:' f,.,.,,- 9�61P7` � t � �1NITMER`,GERALDr.W,.•;&�PAhhEL'�A;A��.Q2SQ5E03CAB�NO?�.-WELL`;.<��; 6,0;0027n001�4�00r3000,.,9/29/,1980� �' Y��?.;�'�;.�y;,M?.: �95619 �;;.,j;34397 MENGEL LESS;%•••r�`"_„��,,_,>,,` •� 02S05E034�?�`N©;��WELL/ .f 37,OU 1,3 Ol)y6�00 25'00 t3l�13/l197w9 DOMESTIC Yf-.r.,.. r'd 95618s�+?y� I SWENSO��Nwm02S05E0NENO}•x;1NELM�ft52001r4�00 2T5,00�'9`/1`5/�973D2�MESTIC Z3'x"^v'.•t:Jc^•-".:y F � ..n.�`nP•^�:9�::: t •.air:C�;:8:4i e..-.y.a...n..{:.{rr• r, n-:.: ,�,3 ..-......,..._.,:.4-...,...y....•:....r,..,.._..._.... •:�.z:�1:.i�:zer_� Y ., :,,......,....e..,.....,<,.:<;...;.,.r.�..u...l..i,..x : .'�i..v. f r ��r t::ch-�::;L.� +S':e.F..V•YT-., sc• ear:c: ;,.{a.;, ,..�.-,...;-x :•s`"f-sc"i: WALT'rf �, :::,;';�r;02SQ5E03®C_� NOWELLli;w%;� :,7,85U rr2400�50:00. 8/1,9/,2002IRRIGATIOP r....,.. ... __ ... .;::./:.:..r,�.:.. �:rtl::: ..;y.....caw--.+�'r✓�.r,.yz�a-,,.vs{-0:"�. '.::.....�.�•,�1u.:i : . .�.v.�.a...�':'J: ...rr,: ;95620. ,=+` BR®CKWAY R L r '<�,<w`''r+ 02S05E03RDD;t NOt:,?•'w 52�0.030l00I8t00 1" 6 8/1963 DOMESTTIC•i-0._ . ..dic r.,t._ .:1� r'�c, tif«1..:..,V... End of Report.. 32 record(s)listed. This report is restricted to site types of WELL,BOREHOLE,SPRING,and COAL BED METHANE WELL. Explanation of Columns: Td=Total depth of well in feet below ground Pwl=Pumping water level in feet below ground Swl=Static water level in feet above/below ground-Negative values are reported for water levels that are above land surface. Yield=Yield in gallons per minute Date=Completion date of well/borehole Use=Reported use of water •Ver?=Was location verified? •The preceding materials represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval.The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user at the time and date of the retrieval.Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Ground-Water Information Center Online 1998-2004 Staff Privacy Statement 4 71?6 T A7 Baxter Lane Al A-r, 47Z5 T wr=s-r INE:>s CC)m N17Y or CC • > AID.. 12- 1 0 z • Jaw • 49 If j 47H Durstan Road m e% WES T =S COMMUNITY NLJ NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E, P.M.M.�A& GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA 1!14 G I H 19 RING -N- USGS TOPOGRAPHY 3 lnft4fng Inc. ey Dr.PSulte 2rofmional Bldg. es MAP MT 59715 FIGURE 2 FAX(406( 5W 0 500 58&1730 iza sods fed DAM SEPT.22.2003 T PRMW NO.04SO67.110 Capytot 0 2003 HKW Engkiewtq hm—AD Mob R@mNv& - i D c� a x NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND RE-VEGETATION PLAN 0, E N G I N E E RI N G • McChesney Professional Bukling 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 February 6,2004 Bozeman, MT 59715 Project No. 04S067.110 Phone: 406.586.8834 Fax: 406.588.1730 www.hkminc.com Mr. Dennis Hengel Gallatin County Weed Control District Coordinator 901 N. Black Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: West Winds Planned Community NW '/4, Section 2, T2S,R5E,P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana Dear Mr. Hengal: Please find attached a weed plan for the above referenced project. This plan is intended for the entire 160-acre project. The project will be built though multiple phases with an anticipated • completion of 10 to 12 years. The attached plan was prepared by Lynn Bacon with Land and Water Consulting. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at (406) 586-8834 or Lynn Bacon at (406) 586-1411. Sincerely, HKM Engineering Inc. int Litle, P.E. Attachment BILUNGS,MONTANA BUTTE,MT BOZEMAN LAB MILES CITY,MT SHERIDAN.WY HELENA.MT 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.585.5915 406.232.6666 307.672.9006 ' 406.442.0370 • NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND GtCa+�t REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS strict FOR DISTURBED AREAS (Revised November, 1999) I. PURPOSE: The purpose of these requirements is to familiarize the person, agency, and/or local government unit hereafter called the Cooperator with the Gallatin County Weed Control District's Noxious Weed Management Plan as well as any legal requirements placed upon the Cooperator by the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act(7-22-2101 through 2153). A secondary purpose is to allow the Gallatin County Weed Control District to determine if a potential noxious weed problem exists in an area to be developed/disturbed and to work with the cooperator in formulating a Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan consistent(and realistic)with the Gallatin County Weed Control District's Noxious Weed Management Plan and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. II. DEFINITIONS: BOARD: Gallatin County Weed Control Board. • DISTRICT: Gallatin County Weed Control District, which is in turn directed by the Gallatin County Weed Control Board and managed by a Weed Control Supervisor/Coordinator. COMMISSIONERS: Board of County Commissioners. NOXIOUS WEED: Any non-native plant species established or that may be established in the State which may render land unfit for agriculture, forestry, livestock, wildlife, or other beneficial uses or that may harm native plant communities and that is designated as a statewide noxious weed by rule of the Montana Department of Agriculture or as a district noxious weed by rule of the Board. REVEGETATION: The act or process of seeding, planting, and/or otherwise reestablishing a cover of beneficial plants which may include the use of recommended plant species, proper methods/timing, fertilization, and the use of weed-free seed. NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT: The planning and implementation of a coordinated program in order to manage the spread of noxious weeds which may include biological, chemical, cultural, and/or mechanical control methods or a combination thereof. III. THE GOALS OF THE GALLATIN COUNTY WEED CONTROL DISTRICT: • The District recognizes and complies with the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act and Administrative Rules(MCA 7-22-2101-2153) for all of it's responsibilities and authority. A copy of this Act can be obtained from the Gallatin County Weed Control Office. The goals of the District are threefold: 1) To manage the spread of noxious weeds while developing effective long- term integrated weed management programs that implement chemical, cultural, biological, and mechanical weed control techniques. 2) To increase awareness and knowledge of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act, noxious weeds and their impacts, and proper weed control techniques. 3) To build and implement programs that help promote cooperative efforts between groups, agencies, and individuals. Methods to obtain these goals revolve around the development of an effective integrated weed management program which includes: • Detecting, containing, and wherever possible eradicating infestations of category 1 and 2 noxious weeds. • Managing noxious weeds on lands owned or controlled by the county or municipalities within the confines of the District, and along County, State, and Federal right-of-ways, stockpiles, and holding areas. • Releasing and redistributing approved Biological Control Agents. • Using and promoting proper chemical, mechanical, and cultural control • techniques. • Providing educational presentations and information. Offering programs to help residents in Gallatin County manage noxious weeds. • Implementing combinations of these and/or other noxious weed control techniques, programs, and practices to work together to manage noxious weeds. Further information can be obtained from the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District. NOXIOUS WEEDS IN GALLATIN COUNTY Category 1 Weeds Category 2 Weeds 1) Canada Thistle 15) Dyers Woad 2) Field Bindweed 16) Purple Loosestrife 3) Whitetop 17) Tansy Ragwort Category 4 Weeds 4) Leafy Spurge 18) Meadow Hawkweed 28) Meadow Knapweed 5) Russian.Knapweed 19) Orange Hawkweed 29) Poison Hemlock 6) Spotted Knapweed 20) Tall buttercup 30) Musk Thistle 7) Diffuse Knapweed 21) Tamarisk 8) Dalmation Toadflax 22) Perennial pepperweed 9) St. Johnswort (Goatweed) Category 3 Weeds 10) Sulfur Cinquefoil 23) Yellow Starthistle 11) Houndstongue 24) Common Crupina 12) Ox-eye daisy 25) Rush Skeletonweed 13) Common tansy 26) Yellow flag iris • 14) Yellow toadflax 27) Eurasian watermilfoil • IV. REQUIREMENTS MANDATED BY STATE LAW: 1) MCA 7-22-2116. Unlawful to Permit Noxious Weeds to Propagate. It is unlawful for any person to permit any noxious weed to propagate or go to seed on their land, except that any person who adheres to the noxious weed management program of their District or who has entered into and is in compliance with a noxious weed management agreement is considered to be in compliance with this section. 2) MCA 7-22-2152. Revegetation of Rights-of-Way and Disturbed Areas. (1) Any state agency or local government unit approving a mine, major facility, transmission line,solid waste facility, highway,subdivision, or any other development resulting in significant disturbance of land within a District shall notify the Board. (2) Whenever any person or agency disturbs vegetation on an easement or right-4 of-way within a District by construction of a road, irrigation or drainage ditch, pipeline,transmission line, or other development, the Board shall require that the disturbed areas be seeded, planted, or otherwise managed to re- establish a cover of beneficial plants. (3) a. The person or agency disturbing the land shall submit to the Board a written plan specifying the methods to be used to accomplish revegetation. The plan must describe the time and method of seeding,fertilization practices, re- commended plant species, use of weed-free seed, and the weed management procedures to be used. b. The plan is subject to approval by the Board, which may require revisions to bring the revegetation plan into compliance with the District Weed Management Plan. Upon approval by the Board, the revegetation plan must be signed by the chairman of the Board and the person or agency responsible for the disturbance • and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. V. REQUIREMENTS OF THE GALLATIN COUNTY WEED CONTROL BOARD FOR DISTURBED AREAS: 1) The District requires that any State Agency or Local Government unit approving a mine, major facility,transmission line,solid waste facility, highway, subdivision, or other development resulting in significant disturbance of land within the District shall notify the board before construction/work begins. 2) The District requires that any person or agency disturbing vegetation on an easement or right-of-way within the District by construction of a road, irrigation or drainage ditch, pipeline,transmission line,or other development, shall reestablish a cover of beneficial plants in a manner and timing approved by the Board. 3) The District requires that any person or agency disturbing the land shall submit to the Board for approval a Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan before construction/work begins.This plan must specify the methods to be used for: -The revegetation of disturbed areas, - the management of noxious weeds already infesting the land(s) in question or that may arise during the development/construction/ disturbance of that land. A copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for Gallatin County accompanies this document. Please include a map of the land(s) being developed/disturbed when submitting this plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office. VI. SUBDIVISION PLANNING REQUIREMENTS OF THE GALLATIN COUNTY WEED CONTROL DISTRICT: • NOTE: Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plans and Memoranda g g of Understanding are reviewed, approved and/or disapproved at the Weed Control Board monthly meeting. Submit completed Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plans and Memoranda of Understanding for review, at least 30 business days prior to the Weed Control Board monthly meeting. The Weed Control Board monthly meeting is scheduled on the 1st Thursday of each month. 1) Requirements for Subdivision and Preliminary Plat Approval (a) Prior to construction/disturbance, a Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan must be completed by the Cooperator and submitted to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office. This plan must specify the methods to be used for: -The revegetation of disturbed areas within the subdivision, - the management of noxious weeds already infesting land(s)within the subdivision or that may arise during the development of the subdivision. This plan is subject to approval by the Board, which may require revisions to bring the plan into compliance with the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. This plan also indicates that the cooperator is familiar with the: -The District's Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas, - the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, - the relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. A Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan accompanies this document. Please include a copy of the subdivision plat when submitting the Noxious Weed • Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office. (b) Prior to Final Plat approval a Memoranda of Understanding (included) must be entered into by the District and the Cooperator indicating that the Cooperator has been informed of and is in compliance with: -The Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan submitted by the Cooperator, - the District's Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas. - the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, - the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Please include a copy of the subdivision covenants at this time. 2) Noxious Weed Requirements for Subdivision Covenants In order to comply with the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act, the District requires that the following items be addressed in the covenants of each subdivision within Gallatin County. (a) Landowners are responsible for noxious weed control on their own individual lots as stated in the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act(7-22-2116) and according to the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan, (b) the Homeowners Association is responsible for noxious weed control in all parks, open spaces and roadways within the subdivision. If there is no Homeowners Association then the landowners as a whole are responsible for noxious weed control in the parks and open spaces. Each landowner is then responsible for the subdivision roadway adjoining their property. The Home- owners Association will also act as the contact point for any noxious weed complaints within the subdivision. • SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) (Revised November 1999) Projected date for preliminary Plat application Date Plan received Before construction/disturbance begins, please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board. This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Upon approval by the Board, this plan must be signed by the Chairman of the Board or appointed Representative in cooperation with the agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Cooperator:_Quest West, LLC (Print Full Name and/or Name of Company) 3825 Valley Commons Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718-6436 _(406) 585-6436 (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2. Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: Legal Description:_NW_1/4, 1/4, Sec._2 ,T. _2 S, R._5_E • If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision/Gravel Pit/Etc:_West Winds Community 3. Land Use (Please check the appropriate box(s) (a) Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture X Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain (b) Future Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential X Commercial X Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain West Winds Community is a proposed mixed-use subdivision featuring private homes and businesses. 4. Is a 0*of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes X No❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan of and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes X No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District? Yes X No ❑ 7. Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes X No ❑ B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN • Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes X No ❑ If yes, list which species and the approximate size of infestation(s) Species Scientific Name Category' Relative Percent Covert Canada Thistle Circium arvense I 99 Houndston ue C no lossum offininale I 1 Poison Hemlock Conium maculatum IV <1 Spotted Kna weed Centaurea maculosa I <1 Musk Thistle Cardus nutans IV <1 Categories I through III are a State of Montana designation with Category I being the most severe. Category 4 is a Gallatin County designated list. 2 Relative percent cover of noxious weed densities. There are no concentrated infestations within the subject property(please refer to enclosed map, Fgt.re1). Canada thistle occurs widely throughout the property within the non-cropped areas (borders, ditch banks, natural areas) but does not occur as a pure community at any location. Houndstongue occurs sporadically within the natural areas. Canada thistle and houndstongue are not depicted on the map as a result of their sporadic and/or consistent occurrence. (Gallatin County noxious weeds are listed in section III of Noxious Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development/ disturbance of the property. Note: If noxious weeds already exist on the property, • please outline these infestations on a map of the area or the subdivision plat................ Please refer to enclosed map, Fjgurea1°,for weed locations. 1. No chemical application is necessary because the site lacks concentrated occurrences. 2. During the development process weeds will be mowed until the area can be seeded according to the City of Bozeman regulations. 3. Two (2) knapweed plants were found on the property which can be pulled or excavated in the spring to decrease the likelihood of future infestation. Other weeds, poison hemlock and musk thistle, may also be pulled because of their infrequent occurrence. 4. Canada thistle and houndstongue may be selectively sprayed in the natural areas to decrease habitat degradation in the future. 3. Please complete the appropriate section(s)corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. (a) Chemical Control: •Chemical Name Rate * Chemical Name Rate "Timing and method of treatment(s): "Weed Control work done by-Self ❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: •Methods of weed control • "Timing of control method(s): *Weed control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (c) Biological Control: • Biological control agent(s) • Timingof the releases of the Bio-control a en ( ) 9 t(s)• .Weed control method(s) used to control weed spread while insects establish ............................. *Weed control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS 1. Are there land(s)already disturbed or that will be disturbed on the property? Yes X No❑ If yes, explain The entire quarter section will be developed and will incorporate 35 acreages of open space as regulated by the City of Bozeman. 2. If the answer was (YES)to question 1 above,what method(s)will be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas (seeding, planting,sod, etc.) • A mixture of seeding, sodding, and landscaping techniques will be used in the areas designated as open space. At the time of this writing (12/11/03) it is unknown what specific seed or sod will be used. Likely a mixture of bluegrass, fescue and bentgrass seed and sod would be utilized; a hydroseed rate of 30#/AC is normally used in these situations. 3. If applicable list the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: Type Rate Type Rate Type , Rate 4. If applicable list the type and amount of fertilizer to be used: Type , Rate Type Rate 5. Timing of revegetation practices: Approximate cultivation date(s) Approximate seeding/sod date(s) Approximate fertilizer date(s) • NOTE: For revegetation recommendations contact the Natural Resource Conservation Service. Noxious Weed Survey: West Winds Community 0 3 II comfic LEGEND • ONE PLANT a } 1 PLANT I I 1Ir UN-NAMED IfflGATION LATERAL 1 = ;FCMrN LINE I I DrTCH I I 4j a • Ea r IT 74 1 4�1 I I l CAPo+IAT — � — — CE}N�NUIC CO — LEAK S7R&e -11 — �I —CD4TMc� s. z� I Figure 1. West Winds Community Noxious Weed locations! I Canada thistle was the most prevalent noxious weed(99%Relative Percent Cover of Noxious Weeds)but is not indicated on the map because of its consistent rate of occurrence throughout the property. Houndstongue was much less prevalent,but also scattered throughout the property and thus not mapped 2 Table 1. West Winds Community noxious weed summary. Species Scientific Name Abbreviation Category' Relative Percent Cover' Canada Thistle Cif um arvense CIRARV 1 99 Cynoglossum Houndston ue offininale CYNOFF 1 1 Poison Hemlock Conium maculatum CONMAC IV <1 Spotted Knapweed Centaurea maculosa CENMAC 1 <1 Musk Thistle Cardus nutans CARNUT IV <1 • Abbreviations are used on the map (Figure 1)to indicate primary locations. s Categories I through III are a State of Montana designation with Category I being the most severe. Category 4 is a Gallatin County designated list 3 Relative percent cover is an indication of dominance within the noxious weed vegetation classification on the property,i.e.: Canada thistle is the most dominant noxious weed of the 5 species observed. . D) APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN • APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED ❑ AND/OR CONDITIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS: Upon Approval or Approved With Recommendations/Conditions the ooperator agrees to comply with the above submitted Noxious Weed Management d R v ation Plan. (Signature of Weed Board Chairman/Representative) =U4LA_Q Coo erator) (Type/print name of Chairman/Representative) (Type/print name of Cooperator) 2—b- o4 (Date) (Date) • WMP-1 E) AMENDED APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN • APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED AND/OR CONDITIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS: • Upon Approval or Approved With Recommendations/Conditions the C operator agrees to comply with the above submitted Noxious Weed Management a d Revege i n Plan. U�v (Signature of Weed Board Chairman/Representative) (Sig at a of Cooperat r) �d ��'AN�� (Type/print name of Representative) (Type/print name of Cooperator) 2- L - o4- (Date) (Date) Created on 04106199 9:31 AM •a � o, (DCL H � O k s • P P ROAD SECTIONS • N D I X �� I — I I — LL - I I rliht'� s��a ' 4� I q rnW I I it Ci •K 1.1.47dfYC CiCR..L:d SEC 33 �r ;;w+.f I ., 'r0• .Q�✓"S ,•. I:I R.. :-FRS:'N LOi c TT`n +' q A-.ZI 5 I_ I �.`•1 v I �p� I SUr:Ui 34 3 � r —7-r-1-- � a r-- I t=_ I III I I 1 I'--- JYV [!f �_- sL•:%air%s.,o>u - - - --- -'-....E------ ;--- 1-- , III 1 , I __- }--"�_i- --�--} - -I--}—�_ -_-1 •fir\ I� uN - II I•" ? I I � IIf Lj LANE t W I t1 ,, I 1 I -•1. JU - I I , JL- - - - 7 VVtT--'- - •• uN a --------- T iOAK STREET (PR/NC/PAL ARTER/AL1 Ss - i�' I 'F:r? ----- i -------------------------------------- -------------- -------I-� i I ---s- Si ------------- A i g rt"':° Fi ie.?i.4 M P:. a iL4ir(%c:;i i Ri:r}. I I I I I SL+i11.1i1•lSlUrd ,t� :ri,Irr r•r I I I 11` I � A rqi ?%iL?Si I ti.... 1. n !i I ; III CBNT6R OF S. 2 LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y ------- PROPOSED ROAD RIGHT OF WAY NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. PROPOSED ROAD CENTERLINE Q1 PRINCIPLE ARTERIAL GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA S {NOIN{{{INO'• WNOR ARTERIAL 7 C� COLLECTOR -N- HKM Ensineetbty Inc. rV LOCAL STREET MCChesneyProfeWonal Bldg, 3''LOCAL ROAD PL A N 601 NB*M.Suite 2 � 3S LOCAL SMEYT Bozeman,W 59715 (40)SH&14 730 200 0 200 FIGURE 6.4 FAX(406) iiiiiiiia tcds fwt DATE FEB.27.2004 PROJECT NO.04S007.110 OW)d ht 0 2004 HO Englnwing Inc.,AN RIghts Rwrwd. H f o_ ni (U (U V) O 30.0' CD �' ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ° o N 4.5' 10.0' 10.0' 4.5' CD tEBLVD. DRIVING DRIVING BLVD. a� a LANE LANE y a 0.5' 0.5' _U u- H W 3 J W �2Y PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ACCESS ROAD TYPICAL SECTION a a NOT TO SCALE a • a / v N x NOTES: 1. THIS ROAD SECTION SHALL BE USED o' WITH MULTIFAMILY AREAS. 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL o BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. V) 0 C3 WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY - FIGURE I-1 TYPICAL SECTION 04S067.11 o FEB. 2004 21' PRIVATE ROAD E N Q.I N E E R I N G WEST—WINDS—TYPICALS.M Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. N Y a � b Cu (U fU C.) 0 c f .0'SE a� 0 cu PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY ' 3.0' 7"7 .0' 9.0' 9.0' 7.0' .0 0 SIID QMKIPARKING DRIVING DRIVING PARKING — a WA LANE LANE LK V1 a 0.5' 0.5' U a z Nl W 3 W KC� 33' LOCAL STREET w a. TYPICAL SECTION a a NOT TO SCALE a a i v Cu 0 N ;c NOTES: 1. THIS ROAD SECTION SHALL BE USED o IN SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS AND INTERNAL GRID SYSTEM. 0 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL BY CITY. v 0 CS WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY - FIGURE 1-2 TYPICAL SECTION 04So67.110 FEB. 2004 IR 33' LOCAL STREET ENGINEERING WEST—WINDS—TYPICALS.MG Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. • i �� �; ��. lu CU ftJ m O o 60.0' N -9�2-C!11- 1 + PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY CD --2:0'- 7.0' 1 10.0' 10.0' 17.0' 3 SI PARKING DRIVING DRIVING PARKING. W LANE LANE LK h 0.5' 0.5' U O_ r F 1 3 i f o. �D� 36 LOCAL STREET 0-1 TYMCAL SECTION a a NOT TO SCALE • a- a i cu N O Y NOTES: 1. THIS ROAD SECTION SHALL BE USED IN SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS n AND INTERNAL GRID SYSTEM. 0 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL i BY CITY. v 0 0 WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-3 TYPICAL SECTION 04So67.11 o I FEB. 2004 35' LOCAL STREET ENGINEERING WEST—WINDS—TrPICALS.Dwc Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc-, All Rights Reserved. W E o � 0 o 65.0' N N / , _ PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY cu /�.0� ' A 7.0' 1 5.0' 10.0' 110.0' t7.0' v 3 SI PARKING BIKE DRIVING DRIVING PARKING — a WA LANE LANE LANE 0.5' (ATM 0.5' } H H 3 i f KD� 40' LOCAL STREET a TYPICAL SECTION CL a • I NOT TO SCALE a a i v N 0 cn �c NOTES: 1: THIS ROAD SECTION.SHALL BE USED IN SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS AND INTERNAL GRID SYSTEM. H 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL v BY CITY. o i 0 WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-3.1 TSCHACHE LANE TYPICAL SECTION DIMAM 04S067.11 o FEB. 2004 40' LOCAL STREET / BIKE TRAIL E N G I N E E R I N G OM WEST—WINDS—TYPICALS.DWG Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc,. All Rights Reserved. CA N f Y a Cu N N o v K� 60' (HARVEST CREEK) 125.0' 65' (WEST WINDS) 0 CU PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY a 3.0' 5 y 8.0' 12.0' 11.0' 24I 0' 11.0' 12.0' f 8.0' 8.0' 0 SID - PARKiNR/' DRIVING DRIVING TURNING LANE/ DRIVINC DRIVINC PARKING C- WA a BIKE LANE LANE RAISED MEDIAN LANE LANE .BIKE y, ALIC v� Ja 0.5' 0.5 0.5' 0.5' U d Y F 1 / / / / N \\\//\\Li \/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\//\\\/\\\//\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\//\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\//\\/ W B OAK STREET a TYPICAL SECiTK)N — PRNC63LE ARTERIAL a a NOT TO SCALE CL a CL .1 NOTES: Cu 1. SOUTH HALF OF OAK STREET CONSTRUCTED m BY HARVEST CREEK SUBDIVISION. x 2. NORTH HALF OF OAK STREET TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY WEST WINDS. 0 3. EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER POLES TO BE WITHIN CENTER MEDIAN. C2 4. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL BY CITY. v 0 es WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-4 TYPICAL SECTION 04So67.110 I FEB. 2004 OAK STREET !N G I N!!RING WEST—WINDS—TYPICALS.DWG Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc.. All Rights Reserved. li ,� f r s • �, E ,C I I �� .I I �`� , � i , � • . { i �` f N F f a r N L 7 cu N C3 O CD a 100.0' .moo PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY Cu 1.0' 5. ' &0' 5.0' 11.0' 21.0' 11.0' 5.0' &0' 0' 1.0' 3 SID PARKING BIKE DRIVING TURNING LANE/ DRIVING BIKE PARKING E— WALK LANE RAISED MEDIAN LANE p ALK ca, 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' a f- i N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ f o a /�F� DAVIS LANE TYPICAL SECTION - MNOR ARTERIAL. a NOT TO SCALE a i Cu NOTES: M 1. EAST HALF OF FOWLER LANE x TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY F WEST WINDS. 'O 2. SECTION LINE IRRIGATION DITCH TO BE WITHIN CENTER MEDIAN. 3. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW W REMOVAL BY CITY. v a o WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-5 TYPICAL SECTION 04S06 110 FEB. 2004 DAVIS LANE I:N 01 N E E R I N G"� WEST—WINDS—TYPICALS.M Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. J ` -i a �� ��� �f �, 3 9 �� �� ;� If �`(F. n I'` I • rt {� V f f a .o N M 0 o 100.0' (V o PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY cu 0 1.0' 5.0' &0' 5.0' 11.0' 11.0' 5.0' 8.0' 5.0' 1.0' SIDE- PARKING BIKE DRIVING DRIVING BIKE PARKING SIDE- WALK LANE LANE WALK 0.5' 1.0' 0.5' a r i a \\\\\\ 77 \\�l \\��\\��\\\�\\\�\\\�\\\ \\\\\�\\\�\\\\\\�\ \ \//\//\��\//\//\//\//\/\//\//\/\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\�/\�/\//\//\//\/�\//\// a \ // // // //\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\////�\////////\\//\\///// f w rEE BAXTER LANE TYPICAL SECTION - k4NOR ARTERIAL � NOT TO SCALE a i v N 0 1 H NOTES: 1. SOUTH HALF OF BAXTER LANE TO BE IMPROVED BY WEST WINDS 0 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL BY CITY. v 0 0 WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-6 TYPICAL SECTION 04So67.110 FEB. 2004 BAXTER LANE E N G I N E E R I N G WEST—WINDS—TYPICALS.MG Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. � I � l � a c� ^ o � In 40 � C i cu PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY cu .0' 5.0' 1 .01 14.0' 11.0' 5.0' 8.0 3 SI PARKING BIKE NG TURNING LANE/ �LAXJNE BIKE PARKING — WA a 0 5. LANE RAISED MEDIAN ' 0.5' A 0.5' a i H i f rA 27th STREET a. TYPICAL SECTION COLLECTOR STREET � NOT TO SCALE i o_ i v N cn NOTES: Y 1. WEST HALF OF N. 27th AVE. TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY WEST WANDS. '0 2. EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER POLES TO BE WITHIN CENTER AN. NO 0 3. ROAD MAINTENANCE ANDS SNOW REMOVAL H BY CITY. v 0 0 WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-7 TYPICAL SECTION 04S067.110 FEB. 2004 27th STREET ENGINEERING WEST—WANDS—TYPICALS.MG Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc.. All Rights Reserved. �® `}y 1 r X L WATER SYSTEM REPORT • Water Distribution Investigation For . West Winds Planned Community Preliminary PUD Application Phase I Subdivision Prepared For: Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 • Prepared By: HKM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozemaa,.,A i'P 5977 5 ti wrT O. = a L 07 PE s- mxu March 2004 04S067.110 • West Winds Water DistribdlTon Investigation March 5, 2004 • Table of Contents Page Purpose ...........................................................................................................................................I ProjectOverview.............................................................................................................................1 Preliminary Conditions Summary...................................................................................................1 Basisof Calculations.......................................................................................................................2 HydraulicAnalysis..........................................................................................................................2 WaterDistribution System .............................................................................................................2 PhaseI.............................................................................................................................................4 City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy Compliance 5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................6 Tables Table 1 -Residential Unit Distribution...........................................................................................I Table 2 -P.U.D Pipes 2000 Water-modeling Summary.................................................................4 • Table 3 -Phase I Pipes 2000 Water-modeling Summary...............................................................5 Figures Figure6.1 - Water System Plan .....................................................................................................3 Appendices Appendix A- Correspondence Appendix B -Water Modeling Results • Page ii E NO IN E E E IN� West Winds Water Distrib�on Investigation March 5, 2004 • Purpose This engineer's report is intended to address the water distribution system for the proposed West Winds Planned Community and the Phase 1 Subdivision thereof. This report will determine the maximum demand within the community and the impact that will have on the overall water distribution system in Bozeman. This report was prepared in accordance with the design criteria set forth in the City of Bozeman's Design Standards and Specifications Policy. Proiect Overview The West Winds Planned Community is a 960-unit mixed use residential development located in the northwest'/a, Section 2,Township 2 South,Range 5 East,bordered by Oak Street on the south,North 27`'Avenue on the east,Baxter Lane on the North,and Davis Lane on the west. Table 1-Residential Unit Distribution (Table 6.1 PUD Application) Senior Residential Multi-Family 21.85 J;-=11.26 246 Skilled Nursing Facility 6.53 150 • Subtotal 28.38 '^ '"'13.95 396 Residential Single-Family 35.63 5.98 213 Town-House 8.31 11.07 92 Multi-Family 16.22 12.15 197 Apartment 4.75 13.05 62 Subtotal 64.91 8.69 564 Total 93.28 10.29 960 Table Notes: 1.Dwelling unit counts for multi-family family,SNF and apartments estimated based on maximum density. 2.Net land area excludes road R/W and parks. Preliminary Conditions Summary The pre-development condition of the proposed 160-acre subdivision is agricultural with no residential structures on site. Current water mains and stubs in the area include a 10" diameter ductile iron pipe (D.I.P)that runs north-south along the future alignment of North 27a'Avenue, a 12" diameter D.I.P that runs north-south along the future alignment of Davis Lane, a 10" diameter D.I.P that runs east-west along Oak Street from North 19a'Avenue to Hunters Way, and • a 12"D.I.P that runs east-west along Oak Street from Hunters Way to Davis Lane. The City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan, prepared by MSE-HKM Engineering in 1997, recommends the Page 1 of 6 ENGINEEYINN 01 0 West Winds—Water Distribution Investigation March 5 2004 installation of a 12"-diameter water main along Baxter Lane from North 190,Avenue to Davis Lane. Basis of Calculations The calculations and recommendations within this report are based on the regulations set forth in the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and all other applicable publications. Calculations are provided in the appendix of this report. Hydraulic Analysis The University of Kentucky Network Modeling Program,Pipes2000®, was used to forecast domestic and fire protection demands for both the entire Planned Unit Development and the Phase 1 Subdivision. Processed output from the water-modeling program is included within the appendix of this report. This modeling was calculated by assigning junction nodes within the subdivision with demands for average day, maximum day and peak hour flows. The peaking factors for these cases were 1, 2.5 and 3,respectively. Water Distribution System • Approximately 24,000 LF of 8" diameter D.I.P will be installed in the West Winds Planned Community as shown in Figure 6.1. The new mains will connect to the existing, outlying mains via three points of connection on Oak Street at Buckrake Avenue, Hunters Way and Windward Avenue; on Davis Lane at Breeze Lane,Winter Park Street and Tschache Lane; and North 271h Avenue at Breeze Lane,Tschache Lane and Trade Wind Lane. Based upon the analysis, the water mains within the West Winds Planned Community do provide adequate capacity for the required fire flows and daily use. Table 1 summarizes the water- modeling results of the entire West Winds Planned Unit Development from the Pipes2000® program. Input data into the model was based on a total of 960 residential dwelling units, a demand of 200 gpd-residential dwelling unit, and the aforementioned peaking factors. This resulted in a total average day lot demand of 133 gpm, a total maximum day demand of 333 gpm, and a total peak hour demand of 400 gpm. These demands are exclusive of fire flows, which are typically between 1500 and 2000 gpm, for this type of residential setting. Through correspondence with City of Bozeman personnel (email from Dean Elliott,WTP Superintendent, is included in the appendix of this report),it was determined that the City of Bozeman water supply has an existing capacity of 16 MGD—inclusive of Lyman Creek Reservoir. As shown in Table 2, the maximum draw on the water supply, which occurs during the peak day flows (inclusive of fire flow)is 14.07 MGD. This leaves approximately 1.93 MGD of reserve water. • Page 2 of 6 6 NOIN EE t IN� % 3 35 BAXTER LANE (MINOR ARTERIAL, ------- ---- ------- 2 3 -—-—-—r T— ILT-7 I F ---L-I--J L-J--L--L--L-J--J - ---------- T:`--f77 F-1-7-1 T-7 1-44-14 fy- WE* 0(7-77-1- LL ---------- F IT 7FT-M-1, K L I ''r-407 -.FV- L 1--- .11, rTnTnTR -t 4-- L 1-1 L jL---- 41 1 111.ITTL- 3 rp Z LQ IL `�7 x c zc L F�I 4Wj -X-WA! 5.L11,------------ —---------------- ---- bAk �TREET (PRINCIPAL TERIA L) 1w A Ir WATER v C ENTER OF S. 2,' LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY DOSTING WATER LINE N W 114 SEC TION 2, T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. DOSTING WATER VALVE ——————— PROPOSED WATER LINE(a-0) GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA GINEERING PROPOSED WATER VALVE -N- Engineering Inc. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT Chesney Professional Bldg. WATER SYSTEM PLAN q"if.9 Bozerna (406)58=9715 200 0 200 FIGURE 6.1 FAX(406)586-1730 —F---NO.04SO67.110 DATE: SEPT 29,2003 C.py*t 0 2003 HKM OvkIftrimg 1—.AN RIght.R—rvd. 0 West Winds—Water DistribuTion Investigation March 5,2004 • Table 2- West Winds Planned Community-P.U.D. Pipes2000 Water-modeling Summary Case "0" - Average Day with Fire Flow Total P.U.D. Demand 133.34 gpm Fire Flow 4015.02 gpm @ 62.92 psi Maximum Pressure within System 80.21 psi @ Node WWJ-12 Minimum Pressure within System 62.92 psi @ Node wwj-ff Net System Demand 3909.34 gpm(5.63 MGD) Case "1" -Peak Day with Fire Flow Total P.U.D. Demand 333.35 gpm Fire Flow 3899.66 gpm @ 59.73 psi Maximum Pressure within System 76.52 psi @ Node WWJ-12 Minimum Pressure within System 59.73 psi @ Node wwj-ff Net System Demand 9773.35 gpm (14.07 MGD) Case "2" - Peak Hour with Fire Flow Total P.U.D. Demand 400.02 gpm • Fire Flow 3837.99 gpm @ 58.06 psi Maximum Pressure within System 74.59 psi @ Node WWJ-12 Minimum Pressure within System 58.06 psi @ Node wwj-ff Net System Demand N/A Case "3" - Average Day without Fire Flow Total Phase 1 Demand 133.34 gpm Fire Flow N/A Maximum Pressure within System 97.43 psi @ Node WWJ-12 Minimum Pressure within System 85.34 psi @ Node WWJ-18 Net System Demand 3909.34 gpm (5.63 MGD) Phase 1 The Phase 1 Subdivision of the West Winds Planned Community will consist of 182 residential dwelling units upon full build-out. The Phase 1 water distribution system will tie into the existing 10" water main on Oak Street at Buckrake Avenue and into the existing 10" water main on North 27`h Avenue at Breeze Lane and Tschache Lane. Table 3 summarizes the water- modeling results of the Phase 1 Subdivision from the Pipes20000 program. Input data into the model was based on a total of 182 residential dwelling units, a demand of 200 gpd-residential dwelling unit, and the aforementioned peaking factors. This resulted in a total average day lot demand of 25.28 gpm, a total maximum day demand of 63.19 gpm, and a total peak hour Page 4 of 6 ENGINEERING � West Winds—Water Distribu ion Investigation March 5, 2004 • demand of 75.83 gpm. These demands are exclusive of fire flows, which are typically between 1500 and 2000 gpm, for this type of residential setting. Table 3 - West Winds Planned Community -Phase 1 Pipes2000 Water-modeling Summary Case "0" -Average Day with Fire Flow Total Phase 1 Demand 25.28 gpm Fire Flow 3680.17 gpm @ 53.87 psi Maximum Pressure within System 79.45 psi @ Node WWJ-34 Minimum Pressure within System 53.87 psi @ Node wwj-ff Net System Demand 3801.28 gpm(5.47 MGD) Case "1" -Peak Day with Fire Flow Total Phase 1 Demand 63.20 gpm Fire Flow 3570.91 gpm @ 51.70 psi Maximum Pressure within System 76.14 psi @ Node WWJ-34 Minimum Pressure within System 51.07 psi @ Node wwj-ff Net System Demand 9503.20 gpm (13.68 MGD) Case "2" -Peak Hour with Fire Flow • Total Phase 1 Demand 75.84 gpm Fire Flow 3524.35 gpm @ 49.89 psi Maximum Pressure within System 75.41 psi @ Node WWJ-4 Minimum Pressure within System 49.89 psi @ Node wwj-ff Net System Demand N/A Case "3" - Average Day without Fire Flow Total Phase 1 Demand 25.28 gpm Fire Flow N/A Maximum Pressure within System 93.79 psi @ Node WWJ-34 Minimum Pressure within System 85.80 psi @ Node WWJ-26 Net System Demand 3801.28 gpm (5.47 MGD) As previously discussed, the City of Bozeman water supply has an existing capacity of 16 MGD. Case "1" which is the peak day demand—inclusive of fire flow—shows a total system-wide demand of 13.68 MGD, leaving 2.32 MGD in reserve water supply. City of Bozeman Design Standards &Specifications Policy Compliance The water distribution systems, for both the West Winds Planned Unit Development and the Phase 1 Subdivision, are in full compliance with the City of Bozeman Design Standards and • Specifications Policy. Page 5 of 6 ENGINEERING West Winds—Water Distribution Investigation 0 March 5 2004 • The working residual pressure was not less than 20 psi at any junction node in the water distribution system under maximum day demands plus fire flow. Also, the velocity of the water in the distribution did not exceed 15 fps through any of the main lines. Conclusion This report establishes the projected water demands required from the full development of the West Winds Planned Community on the City of Bozeman water supply. The basis for this report is the West Winds P.U.D. application of February 2004, which is preliminary. Page 6 of 6 -TEN GINEEEIN� A P P CORRESPONDENCE N LJ N D I X A Johnson, Kevin 0' m: Dean Elliott[DELLIOTT@BOZEMAN.NET] .Ont: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:54 AM To: Johnson, Kevin Subject: RE: West Winds Subdivision Peak demand all in mid-summer: 2003 = 11,181,000 gpd; 2002 = 10, 101, 000 gpd; 2001 = 9,780,000 gpd; 2000 = 10, 607,000 gpd; 1999 = 11, 862, 000 gpd; 1998 = 10,460,000 gpd Capacity with Lyman Creek WTP = 16 MGD Dean Elliott Dean Elliott, WTP Superintendent delliott@bozeman.net -----Original Message----- From: Johnson, Kevin (mailto:KJohnson@hkminc.com] Sent: Thursday, February 05, . 2004 10:29 AM To: Dean Elliott Cc: Simek, Dax; Lowe, Zach; Litle, Clint Subject: West Winds Subdivision Dean, As part of the subdivision application for the above-referenced project WeWed to do an evaluation of the impact to the water system. What we ed to know is the peak day demands (MGD) Bozeman has experienced over the last couple of years. We also need to know the treatment capacity of the plant (+Lyman at +/- 500 gpm) so we can estimate the impact on the reserved capacity of the system. If you have a summary of the monthly peak demands over that last few years it might be useful documentation to include in the application.. You could actually just pick the peak months over the last few years and we would have what we need. Thanks for the help and give me a call if you have any questions. KJ Kevin R. Johnson, P.E. HKM Engineering»Inc. Bozeman, MT 601 Nikles Drive; Ste. #2 (406) 586-8834 06) 586-1730 FAX 1 WATER MODELING RESULTS * * * * * * * * * * K * * * * * * * * * pegoc,I. IJo P I P E 4 * University of Kentucky Network Modeling Software * Copyrighted by KPFS 1998 * Version 1.200 - O1/26/2000 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * late & Time: Mon Mar 01 11:44:10 2004 :NPUT DATA FILENAME -------------- H:\04\S067110\wwmodel .DT2 'ABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME -------- H:\04\SO67110\wwmodel_.OT2 'OSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME --- H:\04\SO67110\wwmodel—.RS2 i N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE . . . . . . . . . . . . = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) . . . . . . . . . . = feet PRESSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . = psig , U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A )UTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT ALL CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS • MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES = 20 Y S -T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N NUMBER OF PIPES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (p) = 881 NUMBER OF END NODES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (j) = 586 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS . . . . . . . . . . . (1) = 291 NUMBER OF SUPPLY NODES . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) = 5 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES . . . . . . . . . . . . .(z) = 1 .se: 0 4 Are_rc q e.'p„y v,,,( AG R...j :ESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 31 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.00030 I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I O N (L A B E L) 'yberNet Version 2.18. Copyright 1991,92 Haestad lethods Inc. .un Description: AVERAGE DAY-ENTIRE YSTEM-1994 sawing: BWATER I P E L I N E R E S U L T S ATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10302 10302 10303 169.62 1.39 0.00 1.92 2.77 10303 10305 10303 226.78 0.50 0.00 1.45 1.17 11306 11302 718.80 3.65 0.00 04 1.38 P-13 10303 WWJ 366.40 9.85 0.00 04 0.39 P-14 9210 WWJ- 6 1279.30 5.25 0.00 5.23 9.72 . P-19 J-8 9210 2350.17 26.69 0.00 9.60 29.99 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 1070.87 6.65 0.00 4.37 7.00 o30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 550.55 1.00 0.00 2.25 2.04 -31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 100.88 0.68 0.00 0.41 0.09 -44 WWJ-34 9103 -177.98 1.50 0.00 0.73 0.25 P-47 J-2 WWJ-8 748.96 1.04 0.00 2 .12 1.48 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 213.68 0.12 0.00 0.61 0.15 P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 30.16 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 624.99 0.52 0.00 1.77 1.06 P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 315.26 0.40 0.00 1.29 0.73 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 434.82 0.35 0.00 1.23 0.54 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 337.78 0.19 0.00 0.96 0.34 WW-1 WWJ-12 WWJ-1 -66.88 0.13 0.00 0.43 0.12 WW-10 WWJ-2 WWJ-3 -175.36 0.20 0.00 1.12 0.73 WW-11 WWJ-4 WWJ-3 221.14 0.25 0.00 1.41 1.12 WW-12 WWJ-3 WWJ-5 -101.77 0.09 0.00 0.65 0.27 WW-13 WWJ-5 WWJ-6 -201.73 0.31 0.00 1.29 0.94 WW-14 WWJ-6 WWJ-7 -190.17 0.21 0.00 1.21 0.84 WW-15 WWJ-10 WWJ-9 -307.62 1.39 0.00 1.96 2.06 WW-16 WWJ-11 WWJ-10 -181.81 0.38 0.00 1.16 0.78 WW-17 WWJ-18 WWJ-17 343.88 2.23 0.00 2 .19 2.53 WW-18 WWJ-17 WWJ-16 16.11 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.01 WW-19 WWJ-16 WWJ-15 164.16 0.18 0.00 1.05 0.64 WW-2 WWJ-2 WWJ-13 86.26 0.19 0.00 0.55 0.20 WW-20 WWJ-15 WWJ-14 2.41.82 0.43 0.00 1.54 1.32 WW-21 WWJ-14 WWJ-13 -116.90 0.10 0.00 0.75 0.34 WW-22 WWJ-13 WWJ-12 -30.64 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.03 WW-23 WWJ-12 WWJ-19 297.17 1.02 0.00 1.90 1.93 WW-24 WWJ-20 WWJ-14 -506.26 3.21 0.00 3 .23 5.18 WW-25 WWJ-17 WWJ-23 555.32 2.88 0.00 3 .54 6.15 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ-25 964.05 1.73 0.00 3 .94 5.76 ww-27 WWJ-25 WWJ-24 715.59 1.57 0.00 4 .57 9. 383 28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 430.46 2.20 0.00 2.75 3.83 29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A 2588.64 12.44 0.00 16.52 106.34 WW-3 WWJ-3 WWJ-14 147.54 0.49 0.00 0.94 0.53 WW30 WWJ-22 WWJ-20 -915.94 3 .79 0.00 5.85 15.53 WW-31 WWJ-19 WWJ-20 409.68 2.30 0.00 2 .61 3.50 WW-32 WWJ-19 WWJ-21 -112.51 0.08 0.00 0.72 0.32 WW-33 WWJ-34 WWJ-21 256.66 1.01 0.00 1.64 1.47 WW-34 WWJ-22 WWJ-21 -631.91 6.16 0.00 4.03 7:.81 WW35 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 1040.79 4.49 0.00 6.64 19.67 WW-36 WWJ-29 WWJ-28 671.02 2.11 0.00 4.28 8.73 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 449.67 1.25 0.00 2.87 4.16 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -369.77 1.40 0.00 2.36 2.89 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -243.55 0.62 0.00 1.55 1.34 WW-4 WWJ-5 WWJ-15 77.66 0.15 0.00 0.50 0.16 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWJ-27 -440.60 1.16 0.00 2.81 4.00 WW-41 WWJ-27 WWJ-30 -525.23 1.33 0.00 3 .35 5.54 WW-43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -520.32 1.63 0.00 3 .32 5.45 WW-44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 248.46 1.29 0.00 1.59 1.39 WW-45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 285.13 1.05 0.00 1.82 1.79 WW-46 11101 J-10 182.68 0.07 0.00. 0.52 0.11 WW-47 J-10 J-4 -78.24 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.02 WW-48 J-4 9103 -566.01 1.10 0.00 1.61 0.88 WW-49 WWJ-12 J-10 -260.93 0.44 0.00 1.67 1.52 WW-5 WWJ-6 WWJ-11 -11.56 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 WW-50 WWJ-21 J-4 -487.77 1.40 0.00 3 .11 4.83 WW-6 WWJ-11 WWJ-16 170.25 0.28 0.00 1.09 0.69 WW-60 WWJ-22A wwj-ff 4015.02 5.84 0.00 45.56 973 . 14 WW-61 wwj-ff wwffres 4015.02 140.21 0.00 102 .50 7010.33 OWW-7 WWJ-8 WWJ-10 123.96 0:34 0.00 0.79 0.38 WW\8 WWJ-10 WWJ-17 227.55 0.65 0.00 1.45 1.18 WW-81 WWJ-22A WWJ-23 -1426.38 17.17 0.00 9.10 35.26 WW-9 WWJ-1 WWJ-2 -89.10 0.06 0.00 0.57 0.21 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 9206 10307 10320 11307 13503 P-10 U M P/L O S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S • INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) M (Hp) W M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED N D N 0 D E R E S U L T S NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (f�t) (ft) (psi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------7-------- 9103 31.00 4890.10 4705.00 185.10 80.21 9202 0.00 5002.47 9203 18.00 4999.71 4755.00 244.71 106.04 9210 0.00 4896.98 4731.50 165.48 71.71 10301 0.00 5028.95 4756.00 272.95 118.28 10302 10.00 4902.56 4756.00 146.56 63.51 0303 30.00 4901.18 4750.00 151.18 65.51 10305 10.00 4901.67 4760.20 141.47 61.30 10306 0.00 5038.08 4760.20 277.88 120.41 11101 31.00 4889.10 4680.00 209.10 90.61 11302 31.00 4894.79 4758.20 136.59 59.19 11303 0.00 5037.83 4758.20 279.63 121.17 J-10 0.00 4889.03 4690.00 199.03 86.25 J-2 0.00 4891.14 J-4 0.00 4889.05 4695.00 194.05 84.09 J-5 0.00 4950.58 4738.00 212.58 92.12 J-8 0.00 4923.67 4737.00 186.67 80.89 WWJ-1 22.22 4888.72 4704.50 184.22 79.83 WWJ-10 22.22 4889.76 4726.50 163.26 70.74 WWJ-11 0.00 4889.38 4720.50 168.88 73.18 WWJ-12 0.00 4888.59 4703.50 185.09 80.21 WWJ-13 0.00 4888.58 4706.50 182.08 78.90 WWJ-14 0.00 4888.49 4710.50 177.99 77.13 WWJ-15 0.00 4888.92 4715.50 173.42 75.15 WWJ-16 22:20 4889.10 4718.50 170.60 73.93 WWJ-17 0.00 4889.10 4722.00 167.10 72.41 WWJ-18 0.00 4891.33 4731.50 159.83 69.26 WWJ-19 0.00 4887.57 4706.50 181.07 78.46 WWJ-2 0.00 4888.78 4707.50 181.28 78.55 WWJ-20 0.00 4885.28 4713.50 171.78 74.44 WWJ-21 0.00 4887.65 4708.50 179.15 77.63 WWJ-22 0.00 4881.49 4715.50 165.99 71.93 WWJ-22A t,�3 3� 0.00 4869.05 4717.00 152.05 65.89 WWJ-23 1 0.00 4886.22 4718.50 167.72 72.68 WJ-24 0.00 4888.42 4723.50 164.92 71.47 J-25 `"t�� VeW.av� r 0.00 4890.00 4728.50 161.50 69.98 WWJ-26 0.00 4891.73 4731.50 160.23 69.43 WWJ-27 1/�W �-� 0.00 4887.38 4719.50 167.88 72.75 WWJ-28 0.00 4885.97 4717.50 168.47 73.00 WWJ-29 22.20 4888.08 4717.50 170.58 73.92 WWJ-3 0.00 4888.98 4711.50 177.48 76.91 WWJ-30 0.00 4888.71 4721.50 167.21 72.46 WWJ-32 0.00 4890.33 4723.50 166.83 72.29 WWJ'-33 0.00 4889.33 4718.50 41 *73 83 74.03 WWJ-34 .20 4888.65 4708.50 15 78.07 WWJ-4 0.00 4889.23 4713.50 76.15 WWJ-5 22.30 4889.07 4711.50 177.57 76.95 WWJ-6 0.00. 4889.37 4720.50 168.87 73.18 oWWJ-7 0.00 4889.58 4720.50 169.08 73.27 J-8 0.00 4890.10 4726.50 163.60 70.89 WWJ-9 0.00 4891.14 4731.00 160.14 69.40 wwj-ff 0.00 4863.21 4718.00 145.21 62.92 4-'P«5��� L° 4 A X. I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) �o� 1n. w.�h. P�oss�•� --------------------- --------------------- 7001 152.66 T4-HT 2.17 7117 152.66 5705 13.04 7002 152.66 41112 15.60 7116 152.66 41202 15.60 RV-G2 151.79 RV-2 15.60 - RV-G6 151.79 5703 15.93 RV-G2 151.37 41101 17'.29 RV-G6 151.37 5750 17.37 7112 145.74 41201 17.76 RV-M4 145.71 71101 25.01 RV-M8 145.71 5701 27.77 RV-M4 145.29 71001 28.90 RV-M8 145.29 5707 29.91 6001 143.60 't,, 71002 31.95 • 5209 141.91 71102 32.82 5210 141.91 5709 32.86 5214 141.91 71003 35.43 5215 141.91 5718 38.70 Pu-1 141. 91 5719 39.06 RV-PUl 141.91 5720 39.11 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING STATUS PRESSURE PRESSURE FLOW (psi or gpm) (psi) (psi) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RV-2 PRV-1 15.60 ACTIVATED 61.48 15.60 513.48 RV-5 PRV-1 62 .30 ACTIVATED 125.50 62.30 10.00 RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 115.68 51.08 0.00 RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 ACTIVATED 116.16 64.20 323.03 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 ACTIVATED 121.13 59.20 426.76 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 151.37 151.79 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 151.37 151.79 0.00 RV-H1-n PRV-1 84 .40 CLOSED 135.44 125.24 0.00 RV-H1-s PRV-1 122 .00 CLOSED 125.24 135.44 0.00 RV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 135.44 125.24 0.00 RV-H4-s PRV-1 107.00 CLOSED 125.24 135.44 0.00 RV-HB-n PRV-1 74 .40 CLOSED 135.44 125.24 0.00 RV-HB-s PRV-1 112 .00 CLOSED 125.24 135.44 0.00 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63 .40 ACTIVATED 118.32 63.40 201.75 -HW3/4 PRV-1 68.40 ACTIVATED 113 .32 68.40 35.03 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 61.30 120.41 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 145.71 145.29 0.00 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 145.71 145.29 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 ACTIVATED 113.09 81.80 54.17 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 ACTIVATED 118.09 76.80 486.74 RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 118.46 76.43 0.00 KV-Yl YKV-1 b`).SU lU'/ .tl4 b-.SU 3.5.0/ RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 *IVATED 112.87 84.47 24.22 RV-P8 PRV-1 79.50OSED 113.15 84.19 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-1 95.00E OPEN 141.91 141.91 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 141.91 141.91 0.00 RV-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 ACTIVATED 116.59 65.20 179.62 RV-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED . 118.28 63.51 0.00 *V-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 WIDE OPEN 86.67 86.67 82.37 N.J 15 vleat SE V-WW4 PRV-1 84 .0.0 ACTIVATED 89.33 84.00 2267.80 -r RV-WW8 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 92 .50 80.84 0.00 cocrit" vva U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S +) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES -) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES NODE FLOWRATE NODE NAME (gpm) TITLE -------------------------------------------- T1-TP 543 .48 T2-SD 4105 .15 T3-LC 574.08 T4-HT 2701.80 wwffres -4015.02 �_ tyre T�� „�, o.4- FET SYSTEM INFLOW = 7924.51 IET SYSTEM-.OUTFLOW = -4015.02 IET SYSTEM DEMAND = 3909.34 .se: 1 � �eti� �Y \�Cc.�t�h� �A�k'r �' 2•S) wr rime -Fi�w N G E S FOR NEXT S I MULATI0N (Change Number = 1 ) UNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE 'ESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 21 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.00068 I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10302 10302 10303 223.29 2.31 0.00 2.53 4.62 10303 10305 10303 290.75 0.79 0.00 1.86 1.85 11306 11302 J-2 1305.27 11.03 0.00 3 .70 4.15 P-13 10303 WWJ-18 439.04 13.76 0.00 1.25 0.55 P-14 9210 WWJ-26 903.96 2.76 0.00 3 .69 5.11 P-19 J-8 9210 1831.29 16. 82 0.00 7.48 18.90 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 927.33 5.09 0.00 3 .79 5.36 P-30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 487.20 0.80 0.00 1.99 1.63 P-31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 71.11 0.36 0.00 0.29 0.05 P-44 WWJ-34 9103 -195.08 1:78 0.00 0.80 0.30 AMP -47 J-2 WWJ-8 928.36 1.55 0.00 2.63 2.21 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 294.03 0.22 0.00 0.83 0.26 P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 -376.91 0.37 0.00 1.07 0.42 P-66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 765.18 0.76 0.00 2 .17 1.54 P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 -99.25 0.05 0.00 0.41 0.09 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 536.94 0.52 0.00 1.52 0.80 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 -28.67 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 WW-1 WWJ-12 WWJ-1 -59.U4 0.10 u.uu u.38 U.lu WW-'10 WWJ-2 WWJ -201.05 0.26 0.00 .28 0.94 WW-11 WWJ-4 WW 242.91 0.30 0.00 .55 1.33 WW-12 WWJ-3 WWJ- -110.24 0.10 0.00 0.70 0.31 WW-13 WWJ-5 WWJ-6 -240.63 0.42 0.00 1.54 1.31 WW-14 WWJ-6 WWJ-7 -228.24 0.29 0.00 1.46 1.18 $-15 WWJ-10 WWJ-9 -348.23 1.75 0.00 2.22 2.59 16 WWJ-11 WWJ-10 -204.12 0.47 0.00 1.30 0.96 -17 WWJ-18 WWJ-17 368.47 2.53 0.00 2.35 2.88 WW-18 WWJ-17 WWJ-16 46.58 0.03 0.00 0.30 0.06 WW-19 WWJ-16 WWJ-15 182.80 0.22 0.00 1.17 0.79 WW-2 WWJ-2 WWJ-13 86.46 0.19 0.00 0.55 0.20 WW-20 WWJ-15 WWJ-14 257.44 0.48 0.00 1.64 1.4� WW-21 WWJ-14 WWJ-13 -95.44 0.07 0.00 0.61 0.24 WW-22 WWJ-13 WWJ-12 -8.98 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 WW-23 WWJ-12 WWJ-19 306.93 1.08 0.00 1.96 2.05 WW-24 WWJ-20 WWJ-14 -504.99 3.20 0.00 3 .22 5.15 WW-25 WWJ-17 WWJ-23 573.63 3 .06 0.00 3.66 6.53 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ-25 1003.21 1.87 0.00 4.10 6.20 WW-27 WWJ-25 WWJ-24 718.57 1.58 0.00 4.59 9.91 WW-28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 418.87 2.10 0.00 2.67 3.65 WW-29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A 2511.74 11.77 0.00 15.03 100.56 WW-3 WWJ-3 WWJ-14 152.11 0.52 0.00 ).97 0.56 WW30 WWJ-22 WWJ-20 -903.37 3 .69 0.00 5.77 15.13 WW-31 WWJ-19 WWJ-20 398.38 2 .18 0.00 2.54 3.32 WW-32 WWJ-19 WWJ-21 -91.44 0.05 0.00 0.58 0.22 WW-33 WWJ-34 WWJ-21 210.69 0.70 0.00 1.34 1.02 WW-34 WWJ-22 WWJ-21 -618.73 5.92 0.00 3.95 7.51 WW35 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 989.64 4.09 0.00 5.32 17.92 WW-36 WWJ-29. WWJ-28 617.35 1.81 0.00 3. 94 7.48 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 416.09 1.08 0.00 2.66 3.60 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -372.29 1.42 0.00 2.38 2:93 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -256.76 0.69 0.00 1.64 1.47 WW-4 WWJ-5 WWJ-15 74.64 0.14 0.00 ).48 0.15 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWJ-27 -395.42 0.95 0.00 2.52 3.28 41 WWJ-27 WWJ-30 -468.01 1.07 0.00 2.99 4.48 -43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -440.13 1.19 0.00 2.81 4.00 -44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 284.64 1.66 0.00 :1.82 1.78 WW-45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 299.70 1.15 0.00 1.91 1.96 WW-46 11101 J-10 216.53 0.10 0.00 0.61 0.15 WW-47 J-10 J-4 -40.35 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.01 WW-48 J-4 9103 -539.83 1.01 0.00 1.53 0.81 WW-49 WWJ-12 J-10 -256.88 0.43 0.00 1.64 1.47 WW-5 WWJ-6 WWJ-11 -12.40 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 WW-50 WWJ-21 J-4 -499.48 1.46 0.00 3. 19 5.05 WW-6 WWJ-ll WWJ-16 191.72 0.35 0.00 1.22 0.86 WW-60 WWJ-22A wwj-ff 3899.66 5.53 0.00 44.25 921.99 WW-61 wwj-ff wwffres 3899.66 132 .84 0.00 99.56 6641.87 WW-7 WWJ-8 WWJ-10 163.18 0.57 0.00 1.04 0.64 WW-8 WWJ-10 WWJ-17 251.75 0.79 0.00 1.61 1.42 WW-81 WWJ-22A WWJ-23 -1387.92 16.33 0.00 8.86 33.52 WW-9 WWJ-1 WWJ-2 -114.59 0.09 0.00 0.73 0.33 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 9206 10307 10320 11307 13503 P-10 ' U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL *ME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) M (Hp) ($) ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE C:LUSED 10 N 0 D E R E S U L T S NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE NAME ", TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE ` (gpm) (ft) .(ft) (ft) (psis- --------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9103 77.50 (2.50)4881.54 4705.00 176.54 76.50 9202 0.00 4943.32 9203 45.00 (2.50)4941.55 4755.00 186.55 80.84 9210 0.00 4886.00 4731.50 154.50 66.95 10301 0.00 4947.35 4756.00 191.35 82.92 10302 25.00 (2.50)4899.36 4756.00 143.36 62.12 10303 75.00 (2.50)4897.05 4750.00 147.05 63.72 10305 25.00 (2.50)4897.84 4760.20 137.64 59.64 10306 0.00 4952.54 4760.20 192.33 83.35 11101 77.50 (2.50)4880.62 4680.00 200.62 86.93 11302 77.50 (2.50)4894.69 4758.20 136.49 59.15 11303 0.00 4950.55 4758.20 192.35 83.35 J-10 0.00 4880.52 4690.00 190.52 82.56 J-2 0.00 4883.67 J-4 0.00 4880.52 4695'.00 185.52 80.39 J-5 0.00 4910.65 4738.00 172.65 . 74.81 J-8 0.00 4902.82 4737.00 165.82 71.86 WWJ-1 55.55 (2.50)4880.19 4704.50 175.69 76.13 WWJ-10 55.55 (2.50)4881.55 4726.50 155.05 67.19 WWJ-11 0.00 4881.07 4720.50 160.57 69.58 WWJ-12 0.00 4880.09 4703.50 176.59 . 76.52 TWJ-13 0.00 4880.09 4706.50 173.59 75.22 J-14 0.00 4880.02 4710.50 169.52 73.46 J-15 0.00 4880.51 4715.50 165.01 71.50 WWJ-16 55.50 (2.50)4880.73 4718.50 162.23 70.30 WWJ-17 0.00 4880.76 4722.00 158.76 68.79 WWJ-18 0.00 4883.29 4731.50 151.79 65.78 WWJ-19 0.00 4879.01 4706.50 172.51 74.75 WWJ-2 0.00 4880.29 4707.50 172.79 74.87 WWJ-20 0.00 4876.83 4713 .50 163 .33 70.78 WWJ-21 0.00 4879.06 4708.50 170.56 73.91 WWJ-22 33?J,�jCj q�ry 0.00 4873:14 4715.50 157.64 68.31 WWJ-22A J 0.00 4861.37 4717.00 144.37 62.56 WWJ-23 ,_.{,( 0.00 4877.70 4718.50 159.20 68.98 WWJ-24 , 0.00 4879.79 4723 .50 156.29 67.73 WWJ-25 0.00 4881.38 4728.50 152.88 66.25 WWJ-26 0.00 4883.24 4731.50 151.74 65.76 WWJ-27 0.00 4878.64 4719.50 159.14 68.96 WWJ-28 0.00 4877.22 4717.50 159.72 69.21 WWJ-29 55.50 (2.50)4879.03 4717.50 161.53 70.00 WWJ-3 0.00 4880.55 4711.50 169.05 73 .25 WWJ-30 0.00 4879.72 4721.50 158.22 68.56 WWJ-32 0.00 4880.91 4723.50 157.41 68.21 WWJ-33 0.00 4880.11 4718.50 161.61 70.03 WWJ-34 55.50 (2.50)4879.76 4708.50 171.26 74.21 WWJ-4 0.00 4880.84 4713.50 167.34 72.51 WWJ-5 55.75 (2.50)4880.65 4711.50 169.15 73.30 WWJ-6 0.00 4881.07 4720.50 160.57 69.58 WWJ-7 0.00 4881.36 4720.50 160.86 69.71 WWJ-8 0.00 4882.12 4726.50 155.62 67.44 0 WWJ-9 0.00 4883.29 4731.00 152.29 65.99 wj-ff 0.00 4855.84 4718.00 137.84 59.73 I A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM ! JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (Psi) PA N. --------------------- ------------------- 7116 145.17 T4-HT 2.17 • 7117 145.17 5705 9.61 7002 145.17 5750 13.94 7001 145.16 41112 15.59 RV-G2 144.30 41202 15.59 RV-G6 144.30 RV-2 15.60 RV-G2 141.76 5703 .15.77 RV-G6 141.76 41101 17.23 6001 141.45 71101 17.57 RV-M4 140.34 41201 17.76 RV-M8 140.34 71001 21.53 RV-M4 137.80 5701 24.35 RV-M8 137.80 71002 24.57 5208 137.62 71102 25.41 7112 136.13 5707 26.45 5001 135.39 71003 28.06 5109 134.73 5709 28.61 5110 133.50 7706 33.48 5108 132.79 5708 34.14 5207 132.54 5720 34.48 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING STATUS PRESSURE PRESSURE FLOW (psi or gpm) (psi) (psi) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RV-2 PRV-1 15.60 ACTIVATED 61.39 15.60 873.00 RV-5 PRV-1 62.30 ACTIVATED 89.37 62.30 25.00 RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 81.66 51:07• 0.00 RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 ACTIVATED 78.30 64.20 324.52 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 ACTIVATED 83.14 59.20 1058.25 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 141.76 144.30 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 141.76 144.30 0.00 RV-H1-n PRV-1 84.40 CLOSED 110.93 110.94 0.00 RV-H1-s PRV-1 122.00 WIDE OPEN 110.94 110.94 1.35 RV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 110.93 110.94 0.00 RV-H4-s PRV-1 107.00 CLOSED 110.94 110.93 0.00 RV-H8-n PRV-1 74.40 CLOSED 110.93 110.94 0.00 RV-H8-s PRV-1 112.00 WIDE OPEN 110.94 110.94 320.28 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63 .40 ACTIVATED 79.59 63.40 276.51 RV-HW3/4 PRV-1 68.40 ACTIVATED 74.59 68.40 39.24 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 59.64 83.35 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 140.34 137.80 0.00 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 140.34 137.80 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 ACTIVATED 87.10 81.80 56.09 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 ACTIVATED 92.10 76.80 703.25 .RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 92.82 76.08 0.00 RV-P1 PRV-1 89.50 WIDE OPEN 86.12 86.12 33 .55 RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 ACTIVATED 87.74 84.50 629.51 RV-P8 PRV-1 79.50 CLOSED 88.33 83.91 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-1 95.00 WIDE OPEN 116.84 116.84 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 116.84 116.84 0.00 RV-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 ACTIVATED 79.84 65.20 248.29 RV-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED 82.92 62.12 0.00 RV-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 WIDE OPEN 73.50 73.50 42.29 F;ZV S vl��tr •RV-WW4 PRV-1 84.00 WIDE OPEN 73.50 73.50 1619.59 Se Cornea o� W RV-WW8 PRV-1 71.80 ACTIVATED 75.19 71.80 169.41 3 U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES -) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES NODE FLOWRATE ODE NAME (gpm) IRITLE -------------------------------------------- T1-TP 948.00 T2-SD 6979.46 3-LC 1224.69 4-HT 4520.82 pN( Df� d�c � •�i,�jcC wwffres -38993899.66 Q--� �66 c6'C o IET SYSTEM INFLOW = 13672.98 JET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -3899.66 1ET SYSTEM DEMAND = 9773.35 ------------------------,-I----------------------------------------i�-------------- L s e: 2 �}--. ?d••k �-{o� (Peak cv%� -tk� % 3> w/ ( I Ttc -i ,tir : HANGES FOR NEXT S I M U L A T I ON (Change Number = 2 ) TUNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 20 TRIALS: ACCURACY- 0.00059 I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL/ M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS. VELD. 1000 (gpm) ,(ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10302 10302 10303 245.30 2.75 0.00 2.78 5.49 10303 10305 10303 311.08 0.89 0.00 1.99 2 .10 11306 11302 J-2 1537.02 14.93 0.00 4.36 5.62 P-13 10303 WWJ-18 466.37 15.39 0.00 1.32 0.62 P-14 9210 WWJ-26 737.67 1.89 0.00 3.01 3.51 P-19 J-8 9210 1603.02 13.14 0.00 6.55 14.77 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 865.35 4.48 0.00 3.53 4.71 P-30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 457.61 0.71 0.00 1.87 1.45 P-31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 55.13 0.22 0.00 0.23 0.03 P-44 WWJ-34 9103 -200.65 1.87 0.00 0.82 0.31 P-47 J-2 WWJ-8 1007.98 1.80 0.00 2.86 2.57 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 326.00 0.27 0.00 0.92 0.32 P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 -529.04 0.70 0.00 1.50 0.78 P-66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 825.09 0.87 0.00 2.34 1.78 P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 -267.11 0.29 0.00 1.09 0.53 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 578.23 0.60 0.00 1.64 0.92 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 -174.17 0.05 0.00 0.49 0.10 WW-1 WWJ-12 WWJ-1 -56.47 0.09 0.00 0.36 0.09 WW-10 WWJ-2 WWJ-3 -210.62 0.28 0.00 1.34 1.02 WW-11 WWJ-4 WWJ-3 252.23 0.32 0.00 1.61 1.43 WW-12 WWJ-3 WWJ-5 -112.98 0.10 0.00 0.72 0.32 WW-13 WWJ-5 WWJ-6 -254.88 0.47 0.00 1.63 1.45 WW-14 WWJ-6 WWJ-7 -246.86 0.34 0.00 1.58 1.37 WW-15 WWJ-10 WWJ-9 -354.87 1.81 0.00 2.26 2 .68 WW-16 WWJ-11 WWJ-10 -210.11 0.50 0.00 1.34 1.02 17 WWJ-18 WWJ-17 373.44 2:60 0.00 2 .38 2 .95 -18 WWJ-17 WWJ-16 52.47 0.04 0.00 0.33 0.08 WW-19 WWJ-16 WWJ-15 187.96 0.23 0.00 1.20 0.83 WW-2 WWJ-2 WWJ-13 87.49 0.20 0.00 0.56 0.20 WW-20 WWJ-15 WWJ-14 262.96 0.50 0.00 1.68 1.54 WW-21 WWJ-14 WWJ-13 -85.91 0.06 0.00 0.55 0.19 WW-22 WWJ-13 WWJ-12 1.58 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 WW-23 WWJ-12 WWJ-19 311.22 1.11 0.00 1.99 2 .10 i WW-24 WWJ-20 WWJ-14 -503.46 3.18 0.00 3.21 5.13 WW-25 WWJ-17 WWJ- 3 581.95 3.14 0.00 3.71 6.70 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ 1004.78 1.87 0.00 0.10 6.22 WW-27 WWJ-25 WWJ- 4 711.84 1.56 0.00 4.54 9.73 WW-28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 410.29 2.02 0.00 2.62 3.51 WW-29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A 2471.54 11.42 0.00 15.77 97.60 OF3 WWJ-3 WWJ-14 .154.59 0.54 0.00 0.99 0.58 30 WWJ-22 WWJ-20 -895.99 3.64 0.00 5.72 14.91 -3-1 WWJ-19 WWJ-20 392.53 2.12 0.00 2.51 3 .23 WW-32 WWJ-19 WWJ-21 -81.30 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.18 WW-33 WWJ-34 WWJ-21 189.17 0.57 0.00 1.21 0.84 WW-34 WWJ-22 WWJ-21 -611.66 5.80 0.00 3.90 7.35 WW35 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 963.89 3.8.9 0.00 6.15 17.U:l WW-36 WWJ-29 WWJ-28 593.78 1.68 0.00 3.79 6.96 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 402.48 1.02 0.00 2.57 3 .39 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -370.11 1.41 0.00 2.36 2.90 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -257.90 0.69 0.00 1.65 1.48 WW-4 WWJ-5 WWJ-15 75.00 0.14 0.00 0.48 0.15 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWJ-27 -374.21 0.86 0.00 2.39 2.96 WW-41 WWJ-27 WWJ-30 -442.77 0.97 0.00 2.83 4.04 WW-43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -407.74 1.04 0.00 2.60 3 .47 WW-44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 292.93 1.75 0.00 1.87 1.88 WW-45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 301.55 1.16 0.00 1.92 1.98 WW-46 11101 J-10 233.00 0.11 0.00 0.66 0.17 WW-47 J-10 J-4 -20.17 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 WW-48 J-4 9103 -523.95 0.96 0.00 1.49 0.77 WW-49 WWJ-12 J-10 -253.17 0.42 0.00 1.62 1.43 WW-5 WWJ-6 WWJ-11 -8.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 WW-50 WWJ-21 J-4 -503.79 1.49 0.00 3.22 5.13 WW-6 WWJ-11 WWJ-16 202.10 0.38 0.00 1.29 0.95 WW-60 WWJ-22A wwj-ff 3837.99 5.37 0.00 43.55 895.17 WW-61 wwj-ff wwffres 3837.99 128.97 0.00 97.98 6448.67 WW-7 WWJ-8 WWJ-10 182.89 0.71 0.00 1.17 0.79 WW-8 WWJ-10 WWJ-17 260.98 0.84 0.00 1.67 1.52 WW-81 WWJ-22A WWJ-23 -1366.45 15.86 0.00 8.72 32.57 A -9 WWJ-1 WWJ-2 -123.13 0.11 0.00 0.79 0.38 ING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED : 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 9206 10307 10320 11307 13503 P-10 U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) W (Hp) M M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED N D N 0 D E R E S U L T S NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9103 93 .00 (3 .00)4877.01 4705.00 172.01 74 .54 9202 0.00 4919.35 9203 54.00 (3 .00)4917.99 4755.00 162.99 70.63 9210 0.00 4880.55 4731.50 149.05 64.59 10301 00 4914.28 4756.00 15 28 68.59 10302 00(3.00)4897.08 4756.00 1 8 61.14 10303 .00 (3.00)4894.34 4750.00 14 .34 62.55 10305 30.00(3.00)4895.23 4760.20 135.03 58.51 10306 0.00 4917.03 4760.20 156.83 67.96 11101 93.00(3.00)4876.16 4680.00 196.16 85.00 01302 93.00 (3.00)4894.63 4758.20 136.43 59.12 1303 0.00 4914.03 4758.20 155.83 67.53 J-10 0.00 4876.05 4690.00 186.05 80.62 J-2 0.00 4879.70 J-4 0.00 4876.05 4695.00 181.05 78.46 J-5 0.00 4893.89 4738.00 155.89 67.5a J-8 0.00 4893.69 4737.00 156.69 67.90 WWJ-1 66.66 (3.00)4875.73 4704.50 171.23 74.20 WWJ-10 66.66 (3.00)4877.19 4726.50 150.69 65.30 WWJ-11 0.00 4876.70 4720.50 156.20 67.68 WWJ-12 0.00 4875.63 4703.50 172.13 74.59 WWJ-13 0.00 4875.63 4706.50 169.13 73.29 WWJ-14 0.00 4875.58 4710.50 165.08 71.53 WWJ-15 0.00 4876.08 4715.50 160.58 69.59 WWJ-16 66.60 (3 .00)4876.31 4718.50 157.81 68.39 WWJ-17 0.00 4876.35 4722.00 154.35 66.88 WWJ-18 0.00 4878.95 4731.50 147.45 63.89 WWJ-19 0.00 4874.52 4706.50 168.02 72.81 WWJ-2 0.00 4875.83 4707.50 168.33 72.94 WWJ-20 0.00 4872.40 4713.50 158.90 68.86 WWJ-21 0.00 4874.56 4708.50 166.06 71.96 WWJ-22 4Dp,o L 0.00 4868.76 4715:50 153.26 66.41 WWJ-22A 0.00 4857.34 4717.00 140.34 . 60.82 WWJ-23 -¢y(, pd 0.00 4873.21 4718.50 154.71 67.04 WWJ-24 T�- 0.00 4875.22 4723.50 151.72 65.75 WWJ-25 e M/W Ret-ID 0.00 4876.78 4728.50 148.28 64.26 WWJ-26 0.00 4878.65 4731.50 147.15 63.77 WWJ-27 0.00 4874.06 4719.50 154.56 66.98 J-28 0.00 4872.66 4717.50 155.16 67.23 J-29 66.60 (3.00)4874.34 4717.50 156.84 67.96 WJ-3 0.00 4876.12 4711.50 164.62 71.33 WWJ-30 0.00 4875.03 4721.50 153.53 66.53 WWJ-32 0.00 4876.07 4723.50 152.57 66.11 WWJ-33 0.00 4875.36 4718.50 156.86 67.97 WWJ-34 66.60 (3 .00)4875.13 4708.50 166.63 72.21 WWJ-4 0.00 4876.43 4713.50 162.93 70.60 WWJ-5 66.90 (3.00)4876.22 4711.50 164.72 71.38 WWJ-6 0.00 4876.69 4720.50 156.19 67:68 WWJ-7 0.00 4877.03 4720.50 156.53 67.83 WWJ-8 0.00 4877.90 4726.50 151.40 65.61 WWJ-9 0.00 4879.00 4731.00 148.00 64.13 wwj-ff 0.00 4851.97- 4718.00 133.97 58.06 t -pCm rc LO A X I M U M AND MINIMUM VALUES. (�soe�,� P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM t4cdc2s I',NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES �J (psi) (Psi) -�sY Zo w.io► . VfC�S5���5 --------------------- --------------------- 7117 140.87 T4-HT 2 .17 7116 140.87 5705 8.21 7001 140.87 5750 12 .54 • 7002 140.87 71101 14 .44 6001 140.23 41112 15.58 RV-G2 140.01 41202 15.59 RV-G6 140.01 RV-2 15.60 RV-G2 136.82 5703' 15.71 RV-G6 136.82 41101 17.20 RV-M4 136.70 41201 17.76 RV-M8 136.70 71001 18.43 5208 136.61 71002 21.47 5001 134.17 7706 22.18 RV-M4 133.51 71102 22.30 RV-M8 133.51 5701 22.95 5109 133.41 71003 24.97 5110• 132.02 5707 25.03 5207 131.58 5709 26.87 5108 131.58 8701 26.96 7112 131.18 5602 30.96 E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING STATUS PRESSURE PRESSURE FLOW (psi or gpm) (psi) (psi) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RV-2 PRV-1 15.60 ACTIVATED 61.36 15.60 988.25 RV-5 PRV-1 62.30 ACTIVATED 74.41 62.30 30.00 RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 67.73 51.07 0.00 RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 WIDE OPEN 63.32 63.32 293.86 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 ACTIVATED 67.20 59.20 1336.16 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 136.82 140.01 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 136.82 140.01 0.00 RV-H1-n PRV-1 84.40 CLOSED 102.39 102.42 0.00 RV-HI-s PRV-1 122.00 WIDE OPEN 102.40 102.40 2.14 RV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 102.39 102.42 0.00 RV-H4-s PRV-1 107.00 WIDE OPEN 102.40 102.40 81.86 RV-H8-n PRV-1 74.40 CLOSED 102.39 102.42 0.00 RV-H8-s PRV-1 112.00 WIDE OPEN 102.40 102.40 506.59 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63 .40 WIDE OPEN 63.24 63.24 312.95 RV-HW3/4 PRV-1 68.40 WIDE OPEN 63.24 63.24 28.12 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 58.51 67.96 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 136.70 133.51 0.00 0 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 136.70 133.51 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 WIDE OPEN 79.04 79.04 42.26 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 ACTIVATED 81.29 76.80 900.78 RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 82.43 75.66 0.00 RV-P1 PRV-1 89.50 WIDE OPEN 83.22 83.22 15.44 RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 WIDE OPEN 83 .22 83 .22 591.12 RV-P8 PRV-1 79.50 CLOSED 83.74 82.69 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-1 95.00 WIDE OPEN 107.19 107.19 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 107.19 107.19 0.00 RV-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 WIDE OPEN 64.86 64.86. 275.30 RV-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED 68.59 61.14 0.00 RV-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 WIDE OPEN 67.89 67.89 5.80 RV-WW4 PRV-1 84.00 WIDE OPEN 67.89 67.89 222.19 n RV-WW8 PRV-1 71.80 WIDE OPEN 67.89 67.89 1375.03 U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S . A N D 0 U T• F L 0 W S +) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES -) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES NODE . FLOWRATE NODE NAME, (gpm) TITLE ------'-------------------------------------- T1-TP 1078.25 T2-SD 7900.90 T3-LC 1485.14 OT4-HT 5101.74 wwffres -3837.99 <* - �zre ,���� J- fET SYSTEM INFLOW = 15566.03 fET SYSTEM OUTFLOW - -3837.99 fET SYSTEM DEMAND = 11728.02 =;, N/A '4tKcp g`vvkN� ise: 3 A,. e.-4e)t t7o t - No : HANGES FOR NEXT S IMULATI0N (Change Number = 3 ) T*ON DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE ?ipe WW-60 is CLOSED ZESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 36 TRIALS: ACCURACY - 0.00005 ? I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE , P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) • (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10302 10302 10303 -10.00 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.01 10303 10305 10303 -10.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 11306 11302 J-2 -31.00 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-13 10303 WWJ-18 -50.00 0.25 0.00 0.14 0.01 P-14 9210 WWJ-26 305.17 0.37 0.00 1.25 0.68 P-19 J-8 9210 520.34 1.64 0.00 2 .13 1.84 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 215.17 0.34 0.00 0.88 0.36 P-30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 120.14 0.06 0.00 0.49 0.12 P-31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 60.49 0.26 0.00 0.25 0.03 P-44 WWJ-34 9103 63.54 0.22 0.00 0.26 0.04 P-47 J-2 WWJ-8 58.93 0.01 0.00 0.17 0.01 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 97.64 0.03 0.00 0.28 0.03 W_P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 89.93 0.03 0.00 0.26 0.03 -66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 81.77 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.02 P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 197.93 0.17 0.00 0.81 0.31 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 80.89 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.02 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 121.69 0.03 0.00 0.35 0.05 WW-1 WWJ-12 WWJ-1 -7.90 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 WW-10 WWJ-2 WWJ-3 -24.74 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.02 WW-11 WWJ-4 WWJ-3 -16.75 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.01 WW-12 WWJ-3 WWJ-5 -23.22 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.02 WW-13 WWJ-5 WWJ-6 -28.09 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.02 WW-14 WWJ-6 WWJ-7 -0.88 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 WW-15 WWJ-10 WWJ-9 -31.77 0.02 0.00 0.20 0.03 WW-16 WWJ-11 WWJ-10 -29.70 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.03 WW-17 WWJ-18 WWJ-17 26.24 0.02 0.00 0.17 0.02 WW-18 WWJ-17 WWJ-16 58.17 0.04 0.00 0.37 0_09 WW-19 WWJ-16 WWJ-15 38.46 0.01 0.00 0.25 0.04 WW-2 WWJ-2 WWJ-13 -5.38 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 WW-20 WWJ-15 WWJ-14 21.03 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.01 WW-21 WWJ-14 WWJ-13 41.81 0.01 0.00 0.27 0.05 WW-22 WWJ-13 WWJ-12 36.43 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.04 WW-23 WWJ-12 WWJ-19 -13.02 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 WW-24 WWJ-20 WWJ-14 39.05 0.03 0.00 0.25 0.05 WW-25 WWJ-17 WWJ-23 -74.93 0.07 0.00 0.48 0.15 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ-25 107.24 0.03 0.00 0.44 0.10 WW-27 WWJ-25 WWJ-24 88.28 0.03 0.00 0.56 0.20 WW-28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 58.57 0.05 0.00 0.37 0.10 WW-29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A -54.24 0.01 0.00 0.35 0.08 WW-3 WWJ-3 WWJ-14 -18.26 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.01 WW30 WWJ-22 WWJ-20 91.32 0.05 0_00 0.58 0.22 0W-31 WWJ-19 WWJ-20 -52.27 0:05 0.00 0.33 0.08 W-32 WWJ-19 WWJ-21 39.25 0.01 0.00 0.25 0.05 WW-33 WWJ-34 WWJ-21 -25.25 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.02 WW-34 WWJ-22 WWJ-21 73.47 0.11 0.00 0.47 0.15 WW35 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 110.55 0.07 0.00 0.71 0.31 WW-36 WWJ-29 WWJ-28 74 .96 0.04 0.00 0.48 0.15 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 59.66 0.03 0.00 0.38 0.10 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -35.60 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.04 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -37.50 0.02 0.00 0.24 0.04 WW-4 WWJ-5 WW 5 -17.43 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.01 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWW -70.59 0.04 0.00 0.45 0.13 WW-41 WWJ-27 WWJ-30 -76.48 0.04 0.00 0.49 0.16 WW-43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -95.03 0.07 0.00 0.61 0.23 WW-44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 18.96 0..01 0.00 0.12 0.01 'W-45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 29.71 0.02 0.00 0.19 0.03 46 11101 J-10 66.64 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.02 W-47 J-10 J-4 123.99 0.04 0.00 0.35 0.05 WW-48 J-4 9103 211.46 0.18 0.00 0.60 0.14 WW-49 WWJ-12 J-10 57.35 0.03 0.00 0.37 0.09 WW-5 WWJ-6 WWJ-11 -27.21 0.01 0.00 0.17 0.02 WW-50 WWJ-21 J-4 87.48 0.06 0.00 0.56 0.2.0 WW-6 WWJ-11 WWJ-16 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 WW-60-XX WWJ-22A wwj-ff WW-61 wwj-ff wwffres 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WW-7 WWJ-8 WWJ-10 -22.85 0.02 0.00 0.15 0.02 WW-8 WWJ-10 WWJ-17 -43.00 0.03 0.00 0.27 0.05 WW-81 WWJ-22A WWJ-23 -54.24 0.04 0.00 0.35 0.08 WW-9 WWJ-1 WWJ-2 -30.12 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.03 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 9206 10307 10320 11307 13503 P-10 ? U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) W (Hp) W M ?0 OWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 3ND --NODE RE S U L T S -NODE - NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC . NODE PRESSURE NODE NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9103 31.00 4928.10 4705.00 223 .10 96.68 9202 0.00 5086.22 9203 18.00 5085.98 4755.00 330.98 143.42 9210 0.00 4928.99 4731.50 197.49 85.58 10301 0.00 5088.04 4756.00 332.04 143.89 10302 10.00 4928.19 4756.00 172 .19 74.62 10303 30.00 4928.20 4750.00 178.20 77.22 10305 10.00 4928.20 4760.20 168.00 72.80 •10306 0.00 5088.02 4760.20 327.82 142.05 11101 31.00 4928.33 4680.00 248.33 107.61 11302 31.00 4928.38 4758.20 170.18 73.75 11303 0.00 5088.02 4758.20 329.82 142.92 J-10 0.00 4928.32 4690.00 238.32 103.27 J-2 0.00 4928.39 J-4 0.00 4928.28 4695.00 233.28 101.09 J-5 0.00 5082.94 4738.00 344 .94 149.47 J-8 0.00 4930.62 4737.00 193.62 83.90 WWJ-1 22 4928.34 4704.50 2 .84 97.00 WWJ-10 .22 4928.40 4726.50 90 87.49 WWJ-11 0.00 4928.39 4720.50 20 89 90.08 WWJ-12 0.00 4928.34 4703.50 224.84 97.43 WWJ-13 0.00 4928.35 4706.50 221.85 96.14 wJ J-14 0.00 4928.37 4710.50 217.87 94.41 15 0.00 4928.37 4715.50 212.87 92.24 -16 22.20 4928.38 4718.50 209.88 90.95 WWJ-17 0.00 4928.43 4722.00 206.43 89.45 WWJ-18 0.00 4928.45 4731.50 196.95 85.34 WWJ-19 0.00 4928.35 4706.50 221.85 96.13 WWJ-2 0.00 4928.35 47.07.50 220.85 95.7A WWJ-20 0.00 4928.40 4713.50 214.90 93.12 WWJ-21 0.00 4928.33 4708.50 219.83 95.26 WWJ-22 13�,�� 0.00 4928.45 4715.50 212.95 92.28 WWJ-22A J 0.00 4928.46 4717.00 211.46 91.63 WWJ-23 0.00 4928.50 4718.50 210.00 91.00 WWJ-24 Gt2 ^` 0.00 4928.55 4723.50 205.05 88.86 WWJ-25 W�„/ 0.00 4928.59 4728.50 200.09 86.70 WWJ-26 0.00 4928.62 4731.50 197.12 85.42 WWJ-27 0.00 4928.54 4719.50 209.04 90.58 WWJ-28 0.00 4928.52 4717.50 211.02 91.44 WWJ-29 22.20 4928.56 4717.50 211.06 91.46 WWJ-3 0.00 4928.36 4711.50 216.86 93.97 WWJ-30 0.00 4928.58 4721.50 207.08 89.73 WWJ-32 0.00 4928.65 4723.50 205.15 88.90 WWJ-33 0.00 4928.59 4718.50 210.09 91.04 WWJ-34 22.20 4928.32 4708.50 219.82 95.26 WWJ-4 0.00 4928.36 4713.50 214.86 . 93.10 WWJ-5 22.30 4928.36 4711.50 216.86 93.97 WWJ-6 0.00 4928.37 4720.50 207.87 90.08 WWJ-7 0.00 4928.37 4720.50 207.87 90.08 WWJ-8 0.00 4928.38 4726.50 201.88 87.48 WWJ-9 0.00 . 4928.42 4731.00 197.42 85.55 ]-ff 0.00 4723.00 4718.00 5.00 2.17 I A X I M U M A N D M I N I MU M V A L U E S P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES E94 Zo µ�e�, pieSSK'�S (psi) (psi) --------------------- ---------------'------ 8202 162.13 T4-HT 2.17 RV-H1-s 162.13 wwj-ff 2.17 RV-H4-s 162.13 5705 14.56 RV-H8-s 162.13 41112 15.60 RV-H1-n 162.13 41202 15.60 RV-H4-n 162.13 RV-2 15.60 RV-H8-n 162.13 5703 16.00 8207 161.26 41101 17.32 6203 157.92 41201 17.77 5209 157.88 5750 18.89 52.10 157.88 71101 28.08 5214 157.88 5701 29.29 5215 157.88 5707 31.45 Pu-1 157.88 71001 32.00 RV-PU1 157.88 5709 34.78 RV-PU6 157.88 71002 35.03 • Pu-2 157.88 71102 35.89 Pu-3 157.88 71003 38.50 RV-PU1 157.88 5718 40.16 RV-PU6 157.88 5719 40.88 E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING TATUS PRESSURE PRESSUREOW (psi or gp (psi) (psi) pm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RV-2 PRV-1 15.60 ACTIVATED 61.52 15.60 268.28 RV-5 PRV-1 62.30 ACTIVATED 145.99 62.30 10.00 •RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 134.83 51.08 0.00 RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 CLOSED 142.92 73.75 0.00 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 CLOSED 142.92 73.75 0.00 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 154.19 154.20 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 154.19 154.20 0.00 RV-H1-n PRV-1 84.40 CLOSED 162.13 1.29.91 0.00 RV-H1-s PRV-1 122.00 CLOSED 129.91 162.13 0.00 RV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 162.13 129.91 0.00 RV-H4-s PRV-1 107.00 CLOSED 129.91 162.13 0.00 RV-H8-n PRV-1 74.40 CLOSED 162.13 129.91 0.00 RV-H8-s PRV-1 112.00 CLOSED 129.91 162.13 0.00 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63.40 CLOSED 142.05 72.80 0.00 RV-HW3/4 PRV-1 68.40 CLOSED 142.05 72.80 0.00 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 72.80 142.05 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 147.71 147.70 0.00 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 147.71 147.70 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 CLOSED 154.75 85.99 0.00 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 CLOSED 154.75 85.99 0.00 RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 154..75 85.99 0.00 RV-P1 PRV-1 89.50 CLOSED 130.61 93.67 0.00 RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 CLOSED 130.61 93.67 0.00 RV-P8 PRV-1 79.50 CLOSED 130.61 93'.67 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-1 95.00 WIDE OPEN 157.88 157.88 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 157.88 157.88 0.00 RV-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 CLOSED 143.89 74.62 0.00 RV-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED 143.89 74.62 0.00 RV-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 ACTIVATED 144.70 89.00 77.06 -rv-v J`Gc-S Kec-r RV-WW4 PRV-1 84.00 ACTIVATED 149.70 84.00 443 .27 ew-WW8 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 149.85 83.85 0.00 SE C,00'vier �� W�✓ U M 'M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S +) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES -) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES NODE FLOWRATE NODE NAME (gpm) TITLE -------------------------------------------- T1-TP 298.28 T2-SD 2144.85 T3-LC 96.00 T4-HT 1370.21 wwffres 0.00 IET SYSTEM INFLOW = 3909.34 IET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = 0.00 IET SYSTEM DEMAND = 3909.34 Q� Cj.Co3 �lGl� ***** HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED ***** WW CT CL CL ___ ____ ___ ___ . . . . . . . . � . . . . � ! . . . . ) | � � * * * * * * * * * * K P I P E 4 * University of Kent cky Network Modeling Software * Copyrighted by KPFS 1998 • * Version 1.200 - 01/26/2000 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * )ate & Time: Mon Mar 01 08:10:00 2004 :. r INPUT DATA FILENAME -------------- H:\04\S067110\WWPHI.DT2 CABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME ---- --- H:\04\S067110\WWPHI.OT2 ?OSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME --- H:\04\S067110\WWPHI.RS2 J N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE . . . . . . . . . . . . = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) . . . . . . . . . . = feet PRESSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . = psig U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A )UTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT ALL CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS • MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES = 20 i Y S T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N NUMBER OF PIPES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (p) = 846 NUMBER OF END NODES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (j) = 568 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS . . . . . . . . . . . (1) = 274 NUMBER OF SUPPLY NODES . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) = 5 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES . . . . . . . . . . . . (z) = 1 ise: 0 �— Al/erele try w�-Fite -Ro�✓ tESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 30 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.00094 I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I O N (L A B E L) .yberNet Version 2.18. Copyright 1991,92 Haestad Iethods Inc. tun Description: AVERAGE DAY-ENTIRE 'YSTEM-1994 )rawing: BWATER ' I P E L I N E R E S U L T S OUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD . MINOR LINE HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS. LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) . (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9102 9101 9103 215.02 4.10 0.00 0.61 0.15 11306 11302 J-2 492.01 1.81 0.00 1.40 0.68 P-13 10303 WWJ- 8 356.60 9.30 0.00 O1 0.38 P-14 9210 WW 1087.25 3.89 0.00 .44 7.19 P-16 WWJ-22A WW - 3 -1685.24 23.39 0.00 10.76 48.03 P-19. J-8 9210 2466.46 29.19 0.00 10.07 32 .80 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 1379.21 10.62 0.00 5.63 11.18 P 30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 508.94 0.86 0.00 2.08 1.76 -31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 -421.38 9.65 0.00 1.72 1.24 P-44 WWJ-34 9103 -421.38 7.41 0.00 1.72 1.24 P-47 J-2 WWJ-8 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 -461.01 0.54 0.00 1.31 0.60 P-66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 31-00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.ft P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 -817.61 2.33 0.00 3.34 4.24 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 -461.01 0.33 0.00 1.31 0.60 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ-25 1904.86 6.12 0.00 7.78 20.33 WW-27 WWJ-25 WWJ-24 1397.66 5.43 0.00 8.92 33 .96 WW-28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 837.08 7.56 0.00 5.34 13 .14 WW-29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A 2002.20 7.73 0.00 12.78 66.08 WW35 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 2002.20 15.07 0.00 12.78 66.08 WW-36 WWJ-29 WWJ-28 1310.11 7.29 0.00 8.36 30.13 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 930.32 4.81 0.00 5.94 15.98 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -692.10 4.48 0.00 4.42 9.24 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -384.78 1.45 0.00 2.46 3.12 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWJ-27 -848.16 3.89 0.00 5.41 13 .47 WW-41 WWJ-27 WWJ-30 -984.68 4.26 0.00 6.28 17.75 WW-43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -870.27 4.22 , 0.00 5.55 14.12 WW-44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 507.21 4.84 0.00 3 .24 5.20 WW-45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 560.58 3 .66 0.00 3 .58 6.25 WW-60 WWJ-22A wwj-ff 3680.17 4.97 0.00 41.76 828.19 WW-61 wwj-ff wwffres 3680.17 119.32 0.00 93.95 5966.17 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 • 9206 10307 - 10320 11307 13503 P-10 U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) M (Hp) ($) ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED N D N O D E R E S U L T S .NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) . (ft) (ft) (psi) -------------=----------------------------------------------------------- 9103 31.00 4899.24 4705.00 194.24 84.17 9203 18.00 5005.72 4755.00 250.72 108.65 9204 5.00 5001.59 4756.00 245.59 106.42 9210 0.00 4893.67 4731.50 162.17 70.27 10301 0.00 . 5034.43 4756.00 278.43 120.65 10302 10.00 4902.74 4756.00 146.74 63.59 10303 30.00 4901.42 4750.00 151.42 65.62 10105 0.00 4901.90 4760.20 70 61.40 10306 00 5045.18 4760.20 .98 123.49 11101 31.00 4892.99 4680.00 212.99 92.30 11302 31.00 4894.81 4758.20 136.61 59.20 11303 0.00 5045.20 4758.20 287 .00 124.37 J-2 0.00 4893.00 J-5 0.00 4940.84 4738.00 202.84 87.90 J-7 0.00 5045.35 J-8 0.00 4922.86 4737.00 185.86 80.54 WWJ-18 0.00 4892.12 4731.50 160.62 69.60 WWJ-22 0.00 4855.02 4715.50 139.52 60.46 WWJ-22A 7.28 4847.29 4717.00 130.29 56.4'6 WWJ-23 0.00 4870.68 4718.50 152.18 65.94 WWJ-24 2.5.2$ 0.00 4878.24 4723.50 154.74 67.05 WWJ-25 9 0.00 4883.67 4728.50 155.17 67.24 WWJ-26 TOW 0.00 4889.79 4731.50 158.29 68.59 WWJ-27 5.00 4874.57 4719.50 155.07 67.20 WWJ-28 0.00 4870.09 4717.50 152.59 66.12 WWJ-29 J 5.00 4877.38 4717.50 159.88 69.28 WWJ-30 8.00 4878.83 4721.50 157.33 68.18 WWJ-32 0.00 4883.05 4723.50 159.55 69.14 WWJ-33 0.00 4882.19 4718.50 163.69 70.93 WWJ-34 0.00 4891.84 4708.50 183.34 79.45 WWJ-4 0.00 4892.99 4713.50 179.49 77.78 WWJ-7 0.00 4893.00 4720.50 172.50 74.75 WWJ-8 0.00 4893.00 4726.50 166.50 72.15 WWJ-9 0.00 4892.46 4731.00 161.46 69.96 WWj-ff 0.00 4842.32 4718.00 124.32 53.87 C} 2.� esc � Z A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S R E S S U R E S . JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM �' 00 W VJ KoGeS (c4ee( NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) 'fbF 20 W<,4 d Q7s5wres --------------------- --------------------- C 7001 153.74 T4-HT 2.17 7117 153.74 5705 13 .20 7002 153.74 41112 15.60 7116 153.74 41202 15.60 RV-G2 152.87 RV-2 15.60 RV-G6 152.87 5703 15.94 RV-G2 152.64 41101 17.30 RV-G6 . 152.64 5750 17.53 7112 147.00 41201 17.76 RV-M4 146.61 71101 25.33 RV-M8 146.61 5701 27.93 RV-M4 146.37 71001 29.23 RV-M8 146.37 5707 30.07 6001 143.90 71002 32.27 5209 143.49 5709 33 .06 5210 143.49 71102 33.14 5214 143.49 71003 35.75 5215'. 143.49 5718 38.85 Pu-1 143.49 5719 39.25 RV-PU1 143.49 5720 39.33 • U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING STATUS PRESSURE PRESSURE FLOW (psi or gpm) (psi) (psi) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RV-2 PRV-1 15.60 ACTIVATED 61.49 15.60 493.02 RV-5 PRV-1 62.30 ACTIVATED 128.30 62.30 10.00 RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 118.12 51.08 0.00 RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 IfIVATED 119.36 64.20 4J2.78 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 IVATED 124.36 59.20 0.23 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 152.64 152.87 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 152.64 152.87 0.00 RV-H1-n PRV-1 84.40 -CLOSED 137.74 127.39 0.00 V-H1-s PRV-1 122.00 CLOSED 127.39 137.74 0.00 lV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 137.74 127.39 0.00 V-H4-s PRV-_ 107.00 CLOSED 127.39 137.74 0.00 RV-H8-n PRV-1 74.40 CLOSED 137.74 127.39 0.00 RV-H8-s PRV-1 112.00 CLOSED 127.39 137.74 0.00 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63.40 ACTIVATED 121.49 63.40 196.68 RV-HW3/4 PRV-_ 68.40 ACTIVATED 116.49 .68.40 34.77 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 61.40 123.49 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 146.61 146.37 0.00 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 146.61 146.37 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 ACTIVATED 116.20 81.80 53.05 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 ACTIVATED 121.20 76.80 313.73 RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 121.36 76.64 0.00 RV-P1 PRV-1 89.50 ACTIVATED 116.52 89.50 52.88 RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 ACTIVATED 121.53 84.50 276.72 RV-P8 ?RV 79.50 CLOSED 121.66 84.37 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-' 95.00 WIDE OPEN 143.49 143.49 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 143.49 143.49 0.00 RV-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 ACTIVATED 119.04 65.20 115.16 RV-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED 120.65 63.59 0.00 RV-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 WIDE OPEN 84.38 84.38 66.25 'PRE/ .�(�ows r► d SE RV-WW4 ?RV-_ 84.00 ACTIVATED 84.76 84,.00 2400.21 RV-WW8 ?RV-_ 71.80 CLOSED 88.28 80.48 0.00 Cm+✓ter Ww > U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S +) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES DUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES NODE FLOWRATE NODE NAME gpm) TITLE -------------------------------------------- T1-TP 523.02 T2-SD 3941.59 T3-LC 425.60 T4-HT 2591.25 rr wwffres 3680.17 IET SYSTEM INFLOW = 7481..45 IET SYSTEM-OUTFLOW = -3680.17 FET SYSTEM DEMA14D = 3801.28 t' "fin (Av 1 ise: 1 6-- 'My �Pe�.��►�-� r ZS� w� -�1,,,, ------______ ' H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N (Change Number = 1 ) UNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE .ESULTS OBTAINED AF^ER 22 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.00302 I E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE P I P E NODE I MBERS FLOWRATE ~HEAD MINOR LINE HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS , LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) --------------- 9102 -----9101---------- -------294.89-----------7.36-------0.00---- -84---- 0-26- 11306 11302 J-2 898.41 5.52 0.00 2.55 2.08 P-13 10303 WWJ-18 401.14 11.56 0.00 1.14 0.47 P-14 9210 WWJ-26 692.94 • 1.69 0.00 2.83 3.12 16 WWJ-22A WWJ-23 -1643.12 22.32 0.00 10.49 45.83 -19 J-8 9210 1971.49 19.28 0.00 8.05 21.66 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 1278.55 9.23 0.00 5.22 9.71 P-30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 457 .57 0.71 0.00 1.87 1.45 P-31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 -440.57 10.48 0.00 1.80 1.35 P-44 WWJ-34 9103 440.57 8.04 .0.00 1.80 1.35 P-47 J-2 WWJ-8 77.50 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.012 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 77.50 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.02 P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 -820.91 1.58 0.00 2.33 1.76 P-66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 77.50 0.01 0.00 0.22 0.02 P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 -1222 .05 4.91 0.00 4.99 8.93 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 77.50 0.01 0.00 0.22 0.02 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 -820.91 0.97 0.00 2 .33 1.76 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ-25 1914.99 6.18 0.00 7.82 20.53 WW-27 WWJ-25 WWJ-24 1390.19 5.38 0.00 8.87 33.63 WW-28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 825.14 7.36 0.00 5.27 12.80 WW-29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A 1945.99 7.33 0.00 12.42 62.69 WW35 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 1945.99 14.29 0.00 12 .42 62.69 WW-36 WWJ-29 WWJ-28 1266.70 6.85 0.00 8.08 28.30 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 898.15 4.51 0.00 5.73 14.97 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -679.29 4.33 0.00 4.34 8.93 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -381.05 1.43 , 0.00 2 .43 3 .06 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWJ-27 -817.98 3.64 0.00 5.22 12.59 WW-41 WWJ-27 WWJ-30 -944.73 3.95 0.00 6.03 16.44 WW-43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -820.98 3 .79 0.00 5.24 12.68 WW-44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 524.80 5.15 0.00 3 .35 5.54 WW-45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 565.05 3.72 0.00 3 .61 6.35 WW-60 WWJ-22A wwj-ff 3570.91 4.70 0.00 40.52 783.23 WW-61 wwj-ff wwffres 3570.91 112.85 0.00 91.16 5642.30 FIDWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED : 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 9206 10307 10320 11307 13503 P-10 ? U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) M (Hp) M M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ?OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED D N 0 D E R E S U L T S NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) -------------------------------------------------------------------------=---- 9103 77.50(2.50)4892.05 4705.00 18T.05 81.05 9203 45.00(.2.50)4947.23 4755.00 192.23 83.30 9204 12.50(2.50)4944.69 4756.00 188.69 81.77' 9210 0.00 4883.43 4731.50 151.93 65.84 10801 00 4957.86 4756.00 2086 87.47 10302 00(2.50)4900.24 4756.00 124 62.51 10303 75.00(2.50)4898.25 4750.00 10.25 64.24 10305 25.00(2.50)4898.94 4760.20 138.74 60.12 10306 0.00 4967.88 4760.20 207.68 • 89.99 �11101 77.50(2.50)4889.18 4680.00 209.18 90.65 1302 77.50(2.50)4894.77 4758.20 136.57 59.18 11303 0.00 4967.14 4758.20 208.94 90.54 J-2 0.00 4889.24 J-5 0.00 4904.57 4738.00 166.57 72.18 J-7 0.00 4976.11 J-8 0.00 4902.71 4737.00 165.71 71.H WWJ-18 0.00 4886.69 4731.50 155.19 67.25 WWJ-22 0.00 4847.88 4715.50 132.38 57.36 WWJ-22A 18.20(2.50)4840.54 4717.00 123.54 53.54 WWJ-23 0.00 4862.86 4718.50 144.36 62.56 WWJ-24 0.00 4870.22 4723.50 146.72 63.58 WWJ-25 �0�.2 °y� 0.00 4875.57 4728.50 147.07 63.73 WWJ-26 0.00 4881.74 4731.50 150.24 65.11 WWJ-27 'O ev-r-,4 12.50(2.50)4866.50 4719.50 147 .00 63.70 WWJ-28 0.00 4862.17 4717.50 144.67 62.69 WWJ-29 12.50(2.50)4868.99 4717.50 151.49 65.64 WWJ-30 20.00(2.50)4870.41 4721.50 148.91 64.53 WWJ-32 0.00 4874.20 4723.50 150.70 65.30 WWJ-33 0.00 4873.49 4718.50 154.99 67.16 WWJ-34 0.00 4883.97 4708.50 175.47 76.04 WWJ-4 0.00 4889.20 4713,50 175.70 76.14 WWJ-7 0.00 4889.22 4720.50 168.72 73.11 WWJ-8 0.00 4889.23 4726.50 162 .73 70.52 WWJ-9 0.00 4887.66 4731.00 156.66 67.89 wwj-ff 0.00 4835.85 4718.00 117 .85 51.07<- 441 I M U M A N D MINIMUM V A L U E S P •R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM �- wD w v/ Ko des ZN NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) ( TfeSStiriet --------------------- --------------------- 7116 149.18 T4-HT 2.17 7002 149.17 5.705 9.88 7117 149.17 5750 14.21 7001 149.17 41112 15.59 RV-G2 148.31 41202 15.59 RV-G6 148.31 RV-2 15.60 RV-G2 146.49 5703 15.79 RV-G6 146.49 41101 17 .23 RV-M4 143.62 41201 17.76 RV-M8 143.62 71101 18.10 6001 142.57 71001 22.06 RV-M4 141.81 5701 24.61 RV-M8 141.81 71002 25.10 7112 140.86 71102 25.94 5208 138.54 5707 26.71 5001 136.50 71003 28.59 5109 135.93 5709 28.94 5110 134.85 5708 34.56 5108 133.90 5720 34.84 5207 133.41 5719 35.35 t E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING STATUS PRESSURE PRESSURE FLOW (psi or gpm) (psi) (psi) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ AV-2 PRV-1 15.60 IVATED 61.40 15.60 fl.28 RV-5 PRV-1 62.30 IVATED 95.37 62.30 5.00 RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 86.57 51.07 0.00 RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 ACTIVATED 85.52 64.20 323.44 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 ACTIVATED 90.45 59.20 652.47 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 146.49 148.31 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 146.49 148.31 0.00 V-H1-n PRV-1 84.40 CLOSED 112.00 118.99 0.00 RV-H1-s PRV-1 122.00 WIDE OPEN 115.50 115.50 42.99 RV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 112.00 118.99 0.00 RV-H4-s PRV-1 107.00 CLOSED 118.99 112.00 0.00 RV-H8-n PRV-1 74.40 CLOSED 112.00 118.99 0.00 RV-H8-s PRV-1 112.00 ACTIVATED 118.99 112.00 124.05 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63 .40 ACTIVATED 86.71 63.40 256.96 RV-HW3/4 PRV=1 68.40 ACTIVATED 81.71 68.40 38.07 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 60.12 89.99 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 143.62 141.81 0.00 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 143.62 141.81 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 ACTIVATED 89.98 81.80 54.62 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 ACTIVATED 94.98 76.80 543 .02 RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 95.43 76.35 0.00 RV-P1 PRV-1 89.50 ACTIVATED 98.86 89.50 54.09 RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 ACTIVATED 103.86 84.50 476.34 RV-P8 PRV-1 79.50 CLOSED 104.21 84.15 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-1 95.00 WIDE OPEN 118.85 118.85 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 118.85 118.85 0.00 RV-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 ACTIVATED 84.78 65.20 231.11 RV-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED 87.47 62.51 0.00 RV-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 WIDE OPEN 72.15 72.15 19.47 peY ne,,r S RV-WW4 PRV-1 84.00 WIDE OPEN 72.15 72.15 745.65 nn RV-WW8 PRV-1 71.80 ACTIVATED 72.52 71.79 1206.37 Cor✓ler o t �/✓�✓ i ` MAR Y OF INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS ;+ NFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM.SUPPLY NODES -) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES NODE FLOWRATE NODE NAME (gpm) TITLE -------------------------------------------- T1-TP 926.28 T2-SD 6805.86 T3-LC 937.48 T4-HT 4404.48 wwffres -3570.91 G-$'� ��r-cRo pJr o r` u JET SYSTEM INFLOW = 13074.10 JET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -3570.91 JET SYSTEM DEMAND = 9503.20 ise: 2 F-' 'QGA�G me'C'LiW34ic4or " 3) ..q re. -Ro„✓ ' H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N (Change Number = 2 ) UNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE �iS OBTAINED AFTER 20 TRIALS_: ACCURACY = 0.00062 ' I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE P I P'E NODE NUMB FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR IJINE HL/ N A M E #1 LOSS LOSS ELO. 1000 (gpm) (f t) ' (ft) ft/s) (ft/ft gP r ) --------------------------------------------------_----------------------------- 9102 9101 9103 322.36 8.68 0.00 0.91 0.31 306 11302 J-2 1034.74 7.17 0.00 2.94 2.70 -13 10303 WWJ-18 420.53 12.62 0.00 1.19 0.51 P-14 9210 WWJ-26 546.43 1.09 0.00 2.23 2.01 P-16 WWJ-22A WWJ-23 -1624.21 21.84 0.00 10.37 44.85 P-19 J-8 9210 1789.90 16.12 0.00 7.31 18.11 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 1243.47 8.76 0.00 5.08 9.23 P-30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 438.65 0.66 0.00 1.79 1.3.4 P-31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 -448.04 10.81 0.00 1.83 1.39 P-44 WWJ-34 9103 -448.04 8.30 0.00 1.83 1.39 P-47 J-2 WWJ-8 93.00 0.02 0.00 0.26 0.03 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 93.00 0.03 0.00 0.26 0.03 P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 -941.74 2.04 0.00 2.67 2.27 P-66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 93.00 0.02 0.00 0.26 0.03 P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 -1362.26 . 6.01 0.00 5.56 10.92 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 93.00 0.02 0.00 0.26 0.03 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 -941.74 1.25 0.00 2.67 2.27 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ-25 1908.70 6.14 0.00 7.80 20.40 WW-27 WWJ-25 WWJ-24 1381.84 5.32 0.00 8.82 33.25 WW-28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 818.18 7.24 0.00 5.22 12.60 WW-29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A 1921.98 7.17 0.00 12.27 61.26 WW351 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 1921.98 13.97 0.00 12.27 61.26 WW-36 WWJ-29 WWJ-28 1249.48 6.68 0.00 7.97 27.60 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 886.67 4.40 0.00 5.66 14.62 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -672.51 4.25 0.00 4.29 8.76 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -377.81 1.40 0.00 2.41 3.01 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWJ-27 -806.03 3 .54 0.00 5.14 12.25 WW-41 WWJ-27 WWJ-30 -929.88 3 .83 0.00 5.93 15.97 WW-43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -804.82 3 .65 0.00 5.14 12.22 WW-44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 526.86 5.19 0.00 3.36 5.58 W45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 563.66 3.70 0.00 3.60 6.32 60 WWJ-22A wwj-ff 3524.35 4.59 0.00 39.99 764.43 61 wwj-ff wwffres 3524.35 110.14 0.00 89.97 5506.80 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 9206 10307 10320 11307 13503 P-10 ' U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) • (%) (Hp) M M -------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 'OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED N 0•D E R E S U L T S NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE r, (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------7---------------------------------------- 9103 93.00 (3 .00)4889.04 4705.00 184.04 79.75 9203 54.00(3.00)4931.51 4755.00 176.51 76.49 9204 00(3.00)4929.26 4756.00 1 26 75.08 9210 10.00 4879.36 4731.50 1 86 64.07 10301 0.00 4932.26 4756.00 176.26 76.38 10302 30.00(3.00)4899.18 4756.00 143.18 62.04 10303 90.00(3.00)4896.90 4750.00 146.90 63.66 Ajokl0305 30.00(3.00)4897.67 4760.20 137.47 59.57 0306 0.00 4941.08 4760.20 180.88 78.38 11101 93.00(3.00)4887.49 4680.00 207.49 89.91 11302 93 .00(3 .00)4894.74 4758.20 136.54 59.17 11303 0.00 4939.90 4758.20 181.70 78.74 J-2 0.00 4887.57 J-5 0.00 4895.72 4738.00 157.72 68.3.5 J-7 0.00 4953 .65 J-8 0.00 4895.48 4737.00 158.48 68.67 WWJ-18 0.00 4884.28 4731.50 152.78 66.20 WWJ-22 0.00 4844.89 4715.50 129.39 56.07 WWJ-22A 21.84(3.00)4837.72 4717.00 120.72 52.31 WWJ-23 0.00 4859.57 4718.50 141.07 61.13 WWJ-24 0.00 4866.81 4723.50 143.31 62 .10 WWJ-25 �GI•� �Qr'` 0.00 4872.13 4728.50 143.63 62.24 WWJ-26 0.00 4878.27 4731.50 146.77 63.60 WWJ-27 T4,-( �ewr"A 15.00(3 .00)4863.11 4719.50 143.61 62.23 WWJ-28 IArW Py 1 0.00 4858.86 4717.50 141.36 61.26 WWJ-29 15.00(3 .00)4865.54 ' 4717.50 148.04 64.15 WWJ-30 24.00(3.00)4866.94 4721.50 145.44 63.02 WWJ-32 0.00 4870.59 4723 .50 147 .09 63 .74 WWJ-33 0.00 4869.94 4718%.50 151.44 65.62 WWJ-34 0.00 4880.74 4708.50 172.24 74.64 WWJ-4 0.00 4887.51 4713 .50 174.01, 75.41 WWJ-7 0.00 4887 .53 4720.50 167.03 72 .38 WWJ-8 0.00 4887.55 4726.50 161.05 69.79 WWJ-9 0.00 4885.53 4731.00 154.53 66.96 wwj-ff 0.00 4833 .14 4718.00 115.14 49.89 1 9 I M U M AND MINIMUM VALUE S P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- -------------------- 14,, K ,f2 SS K rN S 7117 142.99 T4-HT 2.17 7116 142.99 5705 8.69 7002 142.99 5750 13.02 7001 142.99 71101 15.39 RV-G2 142.13 41112 15.59 RV-G6 142 .13 41202 15 .59 6001 140.82 RV-2 15.60 RV-G2 139.26 5703 15.73 RV-G6 139.26 41101 17.21 RV-M4 138.49 41201 17 .76 RV-M8 138.49 71001 19.39 5208 137.10 71002 22.42 RV-M4 135.63 71102 23.25 RV-M8 135.63 5701 23 .43 5001 134.75 5707 25.52 5109 134.05 71003 25.92 7112 133.63 7706 27.47 5110 132 .73 5709 21 .47 • 5108 132.16 5602 32 .30 5207 132.04 8701 32.56 E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING STATUS PRESSURE PRESSURE FLOW (psi or gp (psi) (psi) m) ------------------------------ -------------------------f.25 ----------- RV-2 PRV-1 15.60 ACTIVATED 61.37 15.60 RV-5 PRV-1 62.30 ACTIVATED 83 .94 62.30 30.00 RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 75.73 51.07 0.00 • RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 ACTIVATED 73 .70 64.20 323.80 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 ACTIVATED 78.61 59.20 803.94 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 139.26 142.13 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 139.26 142.13 0.00 RV-H1-n PRV-1 84.40 CLOSED 106.78 106.80 0.00 RV-H1-s PRV-1 122.00 WIDE OPEN 106.79 106.79 1.75 RV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 106.78 106.80 0.00' RV-H4-s PRV-1 107.00 WIDE OPEN 106.79 106.79 66.92 RV-H8-n PRV-1 74.40 CLOSED 106.78 106.80 0.00 RV-H8-s PRV-1 112.00 WIDE OPEN 106.79 106.79 414.16 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63.40 ACTIVATED 74.55 63.40 279.35 RV-HW3/4 PRV-1 68.40 ACTIVATED 69.55 68.40 39.42 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 59.57 78.38 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 138.49 135.63 0.00 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 138.49 135.63 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 ACTIVATED 82 .99 81.80 55.32 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 ACTIVATED 87.99 76.80 622.95 RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 88.57 76.22 0.00 RV-P1 PRV-1 89.50 WIDE OPEN 86.34 86.34 34.45 RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 ACTIVATED 88.19 84.50 560.33 RV-P8 PRV-1 79.50 CLOSED 88.66 84.02 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-1 95.00 WIDE OPEN 111.27 ll1.27 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 111.27 111.27 0.00 RV-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 ACTIVATED 73 .22 65.20 251.76 RV-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED 76.38 62.04 0.00 RV-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 WIDE OPEN 68.67 68.67 6.48 ►S Kee S E RV-WW4 PRV-1 84.00 WIDE OPEN 68.67 68.67 248.09 RV-WW8 PRV-1 71.80 WIDE OPEN 68.67 68.67 1535.33 i M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S +) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES -) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES NODE FLOWRATE NODE NAME (gpm) TITLE -------------------------------------------- T1-TP 1042.25 T2-SD 7613.02 T3-LC 1365.60 T4-HT 4907.73 wwffres -3524.35 4' IET SYSTEM INFLOW = 14928.60 1ET':SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -3524.35 FET SYSTEM DEMAND = 11403.84 N/A Si.nc2 Lse: 3 ,C­ ArerA�C 'br-Y- go r ' H A N G E S FOR NEXT S I M U L A T I ON (Change Number = 3 ) •WON DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE lipe WW-60 is CLOSED .ESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 35 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.00002 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S •STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIO CV -CHECK VALVE • P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL/ .N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 9102 9101 9103 -70.38 0.52 0.00 0.20 0.02 11306 11302 J-2 -31.00 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-13 10303 WWJ-18 -50.00 0.24 0.00 0.14 0.01 P-14 9210 WWJ-26 221.05 0.20 0.00 0.90 0.38 P-16 WWJ-22A WWJ-23 -28.05 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.H P-19 J-8 9210 412.28 1.06 0.00 1.68 1.19 P-23 9210 WWJ-32 191.23 0.27 0.00 0.7.8 0.29 P-30 WWJ-32 WWJ-33 173.75 0.12 0.00 0.71 0.24 P-31 WWJ-33 WWJ-34 275.00 4.38 0.00 1.12 0.56 P-44 WWJ-34 9103 275..00 3.36 0.00 1.12 0.56 P-47 J-2 WWJ-8 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-48 WWJ-4 11101 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-50 WWJ-9 J-2 62.00 0.01 0.00. 0.18 0.01 P-66 WWJ-8 WWJ-7 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 P-68 WWJ-26 WWJ-18 112.00 0.06 0.00 0.46 0.11 P-75 WWJ-7 WWJ-4 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 p-77 WWJ-18 WWJ-9 62.00 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.01 WW-26 WWJ-26 WWJ-25 109.05 0.03 0.00 0.45 0.10 WW-27 WWJ-25 WWJ-24 69.67 0.02 0.00 0.44 0.13 WW-28 WWJ-24 WWJ-23 34.79 0.02 , 0.00 0.22 0.04 WW-29 WWJ-22 WWJ-22A -20.77 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.01 WW35 WWJ-28 WWJ-22 -20.77 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.01 WW-36 WWJ-29 WWJ-28 -54.02 0.02 0.00 0.34 0.08 WW-37 WWJ-33 WWJ-29 -101.25 0.08 0.00 0.65 0.26 WW-38 WWJ-28 WWJ-27 -33 .24 0.02 0.00 0.21 0.03 WW-39 WWJ-29 WWJ-30 -52.24 0.04 0.00 0.33 0.08 WW-40 WWJ-23 WWJ-27 6.74 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 1WWJ-27 WWJ-30 3.38 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 W:4 43 WWJ-30 WWJ-32 -17.48 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.01 WW-44 WWJ-25 WWJ-30 39.38 0.04 0.00 0.25 0.05 WW-45 WWJ-24 WWJ-27 34.88 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.04 WW-60-XX WWJ-22A wwj-ff WW-61 wwj-ff wwffres 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 0.00 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 5220 5803 5902 8216 8219 9206 10307 10320 11307 13503 P-10 ? U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S INLET OUTLET HEAD EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD CHANGE ENCY POWER COST COST (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) M (Hp) ($) ($) ------------------------------------------------------------=------------------ 7OLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED N D N 0 D E R E S U L T S ` F NODE NODE E &ERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRE E NODE NAME% TITLE GRADE ELEVATION PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) t) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9103 31.00 4921.57 4705.00 216.57 93.85 01203 18.00 5087.54 4755.00 332.54 144.10 9204 5.00 5087.38 4756.00 331.38 143.60 9210 0.00 4929.70 4731.50 198.20 85.89 10301 0.00 5088.90 4756.00 332.90 144.26 10302 10.00 4929.19 4756.00 173.19 75.05 10303 30.00 4929.19 4750.00 179.19 77.65 10305 10.00 4929.19 4760.20 168.99 73.M 10306 0.00 5088.83 4760.20 328.63 142.40 11101 31.00 4929.41 4680.00 249.41 108.08 11302 31.00 4929.41 4758.20 171.21 74.19 11303 0.00 5088.83 4758.20 330.63 143.27 J-2 0.00 4929.42 J-5 0.00 5085.17 4738.00 347.17 150.44 J-7 0.00 5088.90 J-8 0.00 4930.76 4737.00 193.76 83.96 WWJ-18 0.00 4929.44 4731.50 197.94 85.77 WWJ-22 0.00 4929.41 4715.50 213.91 92.70 WWJ-22A 7.28 4929.41 4717.00 212.41 92.05 WWJ-23 0.00 4929.42 4718.50 210.92 91.40 WWJ-24 0.00 4929.45 4723.50 205.95 89.24 WWJ-25 2 Ci.rLg Qom' 0.00 4929.47 4728.50 200.97 87.09 WWJ-26 ,I 0.00 4929.50 4731.50 198.00 85.80 WWJ-27 �D � � �h 5.00 4929.42 4719.50 209.92 90.97 WWJ-28 0.00 4929.41 4717.50 211.91. 91.83 WWJ-29 k�r VVW '() ak 5.00 4929.39 4717.50 211.89 91.82 WWJ-30 8.00 4929.42 4721.50 207.92 90.10 WWJ-32 0.00 4929.43 4723 .50 205.93 89.24 WWJ-33 0.00 4929.31 4718.50 210.81 91.35 WWJ-34 0.00 4924.93 4708.50 216.43 93.79 0WW WWJ-4 0.00 4929.41 4713.50 215.91 93.56 J-7 0.00 4929.41 4720.50 208.91 90.53 J-8 0.00 4929.41 4726.50 202.91 87.93 WWJ-9 0.00 4929.43 4731.00 198.43 85.99 wwj-ff 0.00 4723.00 4718.00 5.00 2.17 e- N o -prm AQ Z A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S P R E S S U R E S �o HIM/ n.oa�GS (n JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES '�°�' Zo (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 8202 162.64 T4-HT 2.17 RV-Hl-s 162.64 wwj-ff 2.17 RV-H4-s 162.64 5705 14.59 RV-H8-s 162.64 41112 15.60 RV-H1-n 162.64 41202 15.60 RV-H4-n 162.64 RV-2 15.60 RV-H8-n 162.64 5703 16.01 8207 161.77 41101 17.32 6203 158.31 41201 17.77 7250 158.27 5750 18.92 5209 158.21 71101 28.15 5210 158.21 5701 29.32 5214 158.21 5707 31.48 5215 158.21 71001 32 .06 Pu-1 158.21 5709 34.82 RV-PU1 158.21 71002 35.09 RV-PU6 158.21 71102 35.95 Pu-2 158.21 71003 38.56 Pu-3 158.21 5718 40.19 RV-PU1 158.21 5719 40.92 r r. Z E G U L A T I N G V A L V ER E P 0 R T VALVE VALVE VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH LABEL TYPE SETTING STATUS PRESSURE PRESSURE FLOW (psi or gpm) (psi) (psi) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RV-2 PRV-1 15.60 ACTIVATED 61.52 15.60 260.80 RV-5 PRV-1 62.30 ACTIVATED 146.34 62.30 10.00 RV-CW PRV-1 51.00 CLOSED 135.17 51.08 0.00 RV-D2 PRV-1 64.20 CLOSED 143.27 74.19 0.00 RV-D8 PRV-1 59.20 CLOSED 143.27 74.19 0.00 RV-G2 PRV-1 75.00 CLOSED 154.19 154.20 0.00 RV-G6 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 154.19 154.20 0.00 RV-H1-n PRV-1 84.40 CLOSED 162.64 129.91 0.00 RV-H1-s PRV-1 122.00 CLOSED 129.91 162.64 0.00 RV-H4-n PRV-1 79.40 CLOSED 162.64 129.91 0.00 RV-H4-s PRV-1 107.00 CLOSED 129.91 162.64 0.00 RV-H8-n PRV-1 74.40 CLOSED 162.64 129.91 0.00 RV-H8-s PRV-1 112.00 CLOSED 129.91 162.64 0.00 RV-HW2 PRV-1 63.40 CLOSED 142.40 73.23 0.00 RV-HW3/4 PRV-1 68.40 CLOSED 142.40 73.23 0.00 RV-HW6 PRV-1 58.40 CLOSED 73.23 142.40 0.00 RV-M4 PRV-1 75.00 . CLOSED 147.71 147.70 0.00 RV-M8 PRV-1 70.00 CLOSED 147.71 147.70 0.00 RV-01 PRV-1 81.80 CLOSED 155.40 83.17 0.00 RV-04 PRV-1 76.80 CLOSED 155.40 83.17 0.00 RV-08 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 155.40 83 .17 0.00 RV-P1 PRV-1 89.50 CLOSED 130.61 90.84 0.00 RV-P4 PRV-1 84.50 CLOSED 130.61 90.84 0.00 RV-P8 PRV-1 79.50 CLOSED 130.61 90.84 0.00 RV-PU1 PRV-1 95.00 WIDE OPEN 158.21 158.21 0.00 RV-PU6 PRV-1 85.00 WIDE OPEN 158.21 158-21 0.00 V-SD2 PRV-1 65.20 CLOSED 144.26. 75.05 0.00 V-SD6 PRV-1 60.20 CLOSED 144-.26 75.05 0.00 RV-WW1 PRV-1 89.00 ACTIVATED 145.72 89.00 76.56 ��= RV-WW4 PRV-1 84.00 ACTIVATED 150.72 84.00 335.72 RV-WW8 PRV-1 71.80 CLOSED 150.82 83.91 0.00 Cvfner V�' w 3 U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S +) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES -) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES -NODE FLOWRATE NODE NAME'' (gpm) TITLE --------'------------------------------------ T1-TP 290.80 T2-SD 2085.05 T3-LC 96.00 T4-HT 1329.42 r wwffres 0.00 or- IJo - .Pov JET SYSTEM INFLOW = 3801.28 JET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = 0.00 JET SYSTEM DEMAND = 3801.28 ***** HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED ***** I I I cL P-31 0£-d £Z d 6£-AMA bb-MM - - - - - - d 3M q ON- 3 3 -26 q 2� a 16 . �! m co D� a WWJ-34 • WWJ-22 WWJ-28 WWJ-33 J-22A ry - es I I I I I i I i I I WWJ-30 WWJ-32 wwi- I I I I • I I I I WWJ-24 i I i I I I I I I 9210 WWJ-18 WWJ-26 I I i i i Appendix K SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM REPORT Sanitary Sewer Investigation For West Winds Planned Community Preliminary PUD Application Phase I Subdivision Prepared For: Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 • Prepared By: B KM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikleg. �., Ste. 2 "N�V��\I.1 I t.thlll�� Bo 5 E P IST �raoxmman March 2004 04S067.110 • Table of Contents Page Purpose ...........................................................................................................................................1 Preliminary Conditions Summary...................................................................................................1 Basisof Calculations.......................................................................................................................1 ConveyanceFacilities.....................................................................................................................1 PhaseI.............................................................................................................................................3 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................4 Figures Figure 6.2 - Sanitary Sewer Plan.....................................................................................................2 Appendices Appendix A -Pipe Reach Tabulation Appendix B -Conveyance Facility Calculations • Appendix C—XL Annexation Agreement Page i �� ENGINEERING 1, 5y 8 uNl i S 1* West Winds—Sanitary Sewerkvestigation March 5, 2004 Purpose This engineers report is intended to address the sanitary sewer collection system for the proposed West Winds Planned Community, and specifically the Phase 1 Subdivision thereof. This report will determine the recommended sizing of the internal sanitary sewer system and the impact on the outlying sewer trunk lines. This report was prepared in accordance with the design criteria set forth in the City of Bozeman's Design Standards and Specifications Policy. Preliminary Conditions Summary The Far West Sewer Trunk line is an existing 20"diameter sanitary sewer line that bisects the ' property south to north (see Figure 6.2), and will service the majority of the proposed West Winds Planned Community, with the exception of the northeast corner which will be served by a future 21"trunk sewer main within Davis Lane. Upon crossing the West Winds project and intersecting Baxter Lane, the Far West Sewer Trunk Main turns east on Baxter Lane, where it up-sizes to a 24"main and continues to flow east down Baxter Lane. The XL Annexation Agreement (1997), which brought the West Winds property into the city limits, entitled the West Winds Community to a reserved sewer capacity in the original Far West Sewer Trunk line of 307,200 gpd. This flow rate was based on a maximum total of 960 residential dwelling units and an average flow rate of 320 gallons/residential dwelling unit/day. The 320 - gallon/residential dwelling unit/day figure is conservative. City design standards currently utilize 2.54 persons/dwelling unit and 72 gallons/day/person,or 183 - gallons/day/dwelling unit and 150 gpd/acre for infiltration. Using current standards, West Winds has reserve capacity for • 1,548 units. West Winds is currently requesting sanitary sewer service for 960 units. However, West Winds reserves the right to request additional services at a later date,if needed. A copy of the XL Annexation Agreement can be found in the appendix of this report. Basis of Calculations The calculations and recommendations within this report are based on the regulations set forth in the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. Calculations are provided in the appendix of this report. Conveyance Facilities A schematic overview of the sanitary sewer layout for the West Winds Planned Community is shown in Figure 6.2. This figure labels all of the pipe reaches within the proposed sanitary sewer layout and Table 1, located within the appendix of this report, lists the pipe diameter and slope for each pipe reach labeled. Calculations were made to determine the minimum pipe diameter that will be used to connect the West Winds Community to the existing 20"Far West trunk line and future Davis Lane trunk sewer. The West Winds Community will be serviced primarily by 8" diameter PVC mains with the exception of the Senior Area(southwest quarter), which will be serviced by a 10"PVC main. Specifically, a 10" diameter main (P26-33, P39,P40,P43 and P44) with a minimum slope of Page 1 of 4 ENOINEEEING West Winds-Sanitary SeweRvestigation March 5, 2004 • 0.003 ft/ft will service the Senior Area. A 10"main is required in this area due to the shallow buried depth of the 20"Far West Trunk Main. The 10"main allows flatter pipe slopes making it possible to connect to the north end of the Far West main. This proposed 10"main has a full pipe capacity of 1.22 cfs at 0.003 ft/ft. This line will handle flow from the 475 units in the southwest portion of the planning area, generating a total peak flow of 0.56 cfs. The flowrates are inclusive of the design infiltration rate of 150 gallons/acre/day. This translates into the 10"line flowing at 46% full, which is below the allowable limit of 75%. These conditions provide a scour velocity of 2.21 fps,which will prohibit solids from settling out in the sewer mains. Approximately 100 units, located in the northwest corner of the West Winds Planned Community, will tie into the future 21" diameter sewer main that will be located within Davis Lane, as shown by the delineated area in Figure 6.2. The future 21"diameter sewer main was recommended in the City of Bozeman Wastewater Facility Plan prepared by MSE-HKM Engineering, dated August 1998. The surface topography in this area does not provide adequate slope to tie into the 10"main running north up Hunter's Way (P29). The estimated peak flow from these units is 0.12 cfs, or 76,464 gpd. This flow will occupy approximately 15% of the 8" main's capacity under peak conditions. A scour velocity was calculated to be 2.20 ft/sec. Based on preliminary conversations with the City of Bozeman Engineering Department staff, any sewer improvements funded by West Winds,required within Davis lane to service the West • Winds project will be eligible for impact fee credits. This is due to the conditions within the XL Limited Partnership Annexation that guaranteed sewer service to the property. A portion of the existing Far West Sewer trunk line, along Whisper Avenue and between Tshcache Lane and Trade Wind Lane, will be realigned as development of the community approaches this area. In addition to the relocation of the approximately 690 ft. of sewer main, two existing 48" manholes will be removed and replaced with three new 48" manholes. Phase 1 Phase 1 of the West Winds Planned Community is approximately 31.05 Acres in size, and upon full build-out, will include a total of 182 residential dwelling units. Using the City of Bozeman standard of 2.54 persons per dwelling unit, the City's design generation rate of 72 gallons per capita per day and the Ten States Standard recommended peaking factor of 4, the estimated peak flow for Phase 1 is 0.21 cfs, or 137,794 gpd. This peak flow rate is inclusive of an infiltration rate of 150 gallons/acre/day. A new 8" diameter PVC sewer main is proposed to handle the flow from Phase 1 and will be located along the centerline of the proposed streets. Using Manning's Equation, and assuming a slope of.009, the full-flow capacity of the 8"main is 1.15 cfs, or 743,264 gpd. The peak flow from Phase 1 will flow at approximately 19% of the 8" main capacity-well under the allowed 75%flow limit. Under the described conditions, a scouring velocity of 3.29 ft/sec is provided. The minimum allowable scouring velocity is 2.00 ft/sec. • Page 3 of 4 ENGINE ERIN West Winds—Sanitary SeweOnvestigation 9 March 5,2004 • A total of 16 new 48"diameter manholes will be installed with Phase 1. The proposed 8" diameter sewer main will tie into the existing 20"trunk line via an existing 48"manhole, as shown in Figure 6.2. Conclusion This report establishes the projected sanitary sewer flows of the West Winds Planned Community and the Phase 1 subdivision thereof. The basis for this report is the West Winds P.U.D. application of February 2004, which is preliminary. • Page 4 of 4 ENOINEEEINO � PIPE REACH TABULATION 0 • West Winds Planned Community Table 1-Sanitary Y -Sewer System Pipe Reach Tabulation P Pipe Reach Pipe Length Slope Pipe Reach Pipe Length Slope ID Diameter in. ft. % ID Diameter in. ft. P1 8.00 210 0.91 P30 10.00 286 0.30 P2 8.00 402 0.91 P31 10.00 286 0.30 P3 8.00 400 0.91 P32 10.00 325 0.30 P4 8.00 321 0.91 P33 10.00 273 0.30 P5 8.00 241 0.91 P34 8.00 456 0.75 P6 8.00 86 1.14 P35 8.00 240 0.75 P7 8.00 400 1.14 P36 8.00 371 0.75 P8 8.00 452 1.14 P37 8.00 136 0.40 P9 8.00 232 0.91 P38 8.00 406 0.40 P 10 8.00 160 1.18 P39 10.00 294 0.40 PH 8.00 413 1.18 P40 10.00 196 0.40 P12 8.00 241 1.18 P41 8.00 436 0.40 P13 8.00 437 1.18 P42 8.00 128 0.40 P 14 8.00 160 1.18 P43 10.00 247 0.40 P15 8.00 167 0.91 P44 10.00 158 0.40 P 16 8.00 78 0.47 P45 8.00 241 0.40 P 17 8.00 134 0.47 P46 8.00 550 0.40 P 18 8.00 263 0.47 P47 8.00 379 0.40 P19 8.00 263 0.47 P48 8.00 246 0.40 P20 8.00 136 0.40 P49 8.00 540 0.40 P21 8.00 151 0.40 P50 8.00 308 0.40 P22 8.00 412 0.40 P51 8.00 280 0.40 • P23 8.00 215 0.40 P52 8.00 530 0.40 P24 8.00 316 0.40 P53 8.00 368 0.40 P25 24.00 207 0.10 P54 8.00 280 0.40 P26 10.00 25 0.30 P55 8.00 521 0.40 P27 10.00 98 0.30 P56 8.00 426 0.40 P28 10.00 264 0.30 P57 8.00 218 0.40 P29 10.00 167 0.30 Note: In pipe reaches where the slope is 0.40%,the minimum slope was used to determine the worst case flow scenarios. It is expected that greater slopes will be used,thereby increasing the flow capacity of those specific reaches. • CONVEYANCE FACILTIY TABULATION West Winds Planned Community Bozeman, MT The following calculations are used to determine the mean sanitary sewer flow under developed conditions in the existing 20"diameter trunk line. Using Manning's Equation,the full flow capacity of the existing 20"diameter PVC Sewer line is: Qfull= (1.486/n)*A*Rm*S'/2,where n = 0.013 for PVC Pipe A= PI*r2= 2.18 fe P=2*Pl*r= 5.24 ft R=A/P= 0.42 ft S = 0.008242 �Qfull= 12.61 cfs Calculate the peak flow rate under developed conditions: Using the City standard of 2.54 persons per dwelling unit with a total of 860 units, • the City's design generation rate of 72 gallons per capita per day and the Ten Standard recommended peaking factor of 4.0,the estimated flow under peak conditions is: Included in the peak flow, is an infiltration rate of 150 gallons/acre/day Area of Phase 1 = 160 Acres Qlnfil. = 24,000.00 gpd Qmax= 653,107.gpd = 1.01 cfs Using the above parameters,velocity at peak flow in the 20"diameter pipe is: v= (1.486/n)*R7J3*S1�2= 5.78 ft/sec Qmax/Qfull' 0•08 8.02% • • West Winds Planned Community-Phase 1 Bozeman, MT The following calculations are used to determine the mean sanitary sewer flow and required pipe diameter for Phase 1 Subdivision of the West Winds Planned Community. Using Manning's Equation, the full flow capacity of the proposed 8"diameter PVC Sewer line is: Qfull=(1.486/n)*A*Rm*S"2,where n= 0.013 for PVC Pipe A= PlY= 0.35 ft2 P =2*PI*r= 2.09 ft R=A/P= 0.17 ft S= 0.009 QfU11 1.15 cfs Calculate the peak flow rate under developed conditions: Using the City standard of 2.54 persons per dwelling unit with a total of 182 units, • the City's design generation rate of 72 gallons per capita per day and the Ten Standard recommended peaking factor of 4.0, the estimated flow under peak conditions is: Included in the peak flow, is an infiltration rate of 150 gallons/acre/day Area of Phase 1 = 31.05 Acres Qinn. = 4657.5 gpd Qmax 137,794.gpd 0.21 cfs Using the above parameters, velocity at peak flow in the 8"diameter pipe is: v= (1.486/n)*R2/3*S1/2 ft/sec Qmax/Qfull- 0.18 = 18.49% • • West Winds Planned Community-West Portion Bozeman, MT The following calculations are used to determine the mean sanitary sewer flow and required pipe diameter for the majority of the area west of the seasonal watercourse. Using Manning's Equation, the full flow capacity of the proposed 10"diameter PVC Sewer line is: The minimum slope of 0.003 ft/ft was used to determine the worst case scenario flow. Qf,ii=(1.486/n)*A*R2'3*Slr2,where n = 0.013 for PVC Pipe A= PlY= 0.55 ft2 P =2*PI*r= 2.62 ft R=A/P = 0.21 ft S = 0.003 Assume minimal slope 1—._QfUn 1.22y cfs�._ Calculate the peak flow rate under developed conditions: • Using the City standard of 2.54 persons per dwelling unit with a total of 475 units, the City's design generation rate of 72 gallons per capita per day and the Ten Standard recommended peaking factor of 4.0,the estimated flow under peak conditions is: Included in the peak flow, is an infiltration rate of 150 gallons/acre/day Area of Phase 1 = 78.3 Acres Qinfii. = 11745 gpd Qmax= 359,217 9Pd = 0.56, .cfs' Using the above parameters,velocity at peak flow in the 10"diameter pipe is: v=(1.486/n)*R2/3*S'/2=[� 2.21 ft/sec Qmax/Qfuii= 0.46 45.70% • West Winds Planned Community-Northwest Corner Bozeman, MT The following calculations are used to determine the mean sanitary sewer flow and required pipe diameter for the delineated northwest corner of the West Winds Planned Community which will tie into the future sewer main running along Davis Lane. Using Manning's Equation,the full flow capacity of the proposed 8"diameter PVC Sewer line is: Qfun=(1.486/n)*A-a-S112,where n = 0.013 for PVC Pipe A= PlY= 0.35 ft2 P =2*PI*r= 2.09 ft R=A/P= 0.17 ft S= 0.004 Assume minimal slope 1 Qfuo'= 0.77 cfs Calculate the peak flow rate under developed conditions: Using the City standard of 2.54 persons per dwelling unit with a total of 100 units, • the City's design generation rate of 72 gallons per capita per day and the Ten Standard recommended peaking factor of 4.0,the estimated flow under peak conditions is: Included in the peak flow, is an infiltration rate of 150 gallons/acre/day Area of Phase 1 = 22.08 Acres Qinfii. = 3312 gpd Qmax= 761,464 gpd = 0.12 cfs Using the above parameters, velocity at peak flow in the 8"diameter pipe is: v= (1.486/n)*R7J3*S"= 2:20 ft/sec Qmax/Qfull= 0.15 15.39% • XL ANNEXATION AGREEMENT �- BOZEM� CITY-CO NTY PLANNING OFFICE Bozeman 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE ® City-County Planning Office P.O.BOX 640,BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771.0640 PHONE:(406)582-2360 FAX: (406)582.2363 MEMORANDUM TO: PHILL FORBES,DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE FROM: DEBBIE ARKELL,ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR \ DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1997 RE: XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION-PAYME OF RESERVED SEWER CAPACITY Per Section 14 of the XL Limited Partnership Annexation Agreement, attached please find XL Partnership check #1006 in the amount of$74,748.80, as well as a copy of Joseph W. Sabol's December 8, 1997 letter forwarding the same. This payment is provided for SID 621, and in recognition of the payment, the portion of the XL Limited Partnership Annexation tract which is served by gravity sewerkis now entitled to'reserved sewer capacity in the original Far West Sewer Trunk he. sta a Annexation Agreement,the total amount of reserved sewer capacity in the trunk lin is 307,200 lions average daily flow(based on a residential density of six units per acre,a maximur3rteta 60 residential dwelling units,and an average flow rate of 320 gallons per residential dwelling unit per day.) A copy of the fully executed Annexation Agreement,which was approved by the City Commission on December 1, 1997 by Resolution No.3216,and filed on December 4, 1997,is attached for your convenience. • Please deposit this check in the appropriate account,and submit a receipt for deposit to me. Should you have questions regarding this submittal,please call me at 2364. .1 .1 DA/dla Enc. cc: Joseph W.Sabol,Attorney at Law . 93-122/929 1006 .. XL PARTNERSHIP 5.96 0211OD0760 r P.O.Bolt 1118� LIVINGSTON,MT 59047. r j PAYTOTHE ORDER OF $ 7 /(r, ,[� i� MEM 1:09 29 12 0 1 1000760113 1006 �vM�'_`�i1da-..lam.-wmfrsIDl�-�Y @Sa®A.- : - ai0am�^. .-.�+s.•+--.w¢?AST. �wa�.ct�^_ :+5+!pvoC.!_ Further, upon tlic execution of this Agreement, the Landowner shall do all things necessary and proper to aid and assist the City in carrying out the terms, conditions and provisions of this • Agreement and effectuate the annexation of the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION tract to the City. 3. Services Provided. The City will, upon annexation, make currently existing and available City services, including water service,sewer service, police protection, and fire protection, available to the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION,as provided in this Agreement. 4. Municipal Water Service Defined. The term"municipal water service"as is used in this Agreement shall be the service which is supplied by the City in accordance with Chapter 13.12,Bozeman Municipal Code,or as may be amended, as well as any other terms and conditions which apply to the City's provision of this service. The term does. not contemplate the extension of lines or construction of necessary improvements at any cost to the City for delivery of water to and within the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION. Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate the City to pay for • right-of-way acquisition,engineering,construction,and other costs for the delivery'of water to or a within the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION to include, but not limited to, any impact fees,hook-tip,connection,or development charges which may be established by the City. 5. Municipal Sewer Service Defined. The term"municipal sewer service" as is used in this Agreement shall be the service which is supplied by the City in accordance with Chapter 13.24,Bozeman Municipal Code,or as may be amended, is well as any other terms and conditions which apply to the City's provision of'thiti service. The term does not contemplate the extension of lines or construction of necessary improvements at any cost to the City for collection of sewage at and within the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION. Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate the City to pay for right-of-way acquisition, engineering, construction, and other costs for the collection of sewage services to or within the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION to include, but not limited to, any impact fees, hookup, connection, or development charges which may be established by the City. XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Page 3 Both parties agree that a comprehensive design report evaluating existing capacity of • sewer utilties will not be necessary prior to development, as reserve sewer capacity has been provided to serve this property,as outlined in Section 14 of this agreement. Landowner acknowledges that City's Water Facility Plan is currently being finalized, and that pressure zone appurtenances may be required of the Landowner or future developer(s) with future development. 8.Acknowledement of Traffic ImnaCls Landowner understands and agrees that additional traffic from development of the XL LIMITED .PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION will impact existing streets in the area, and that mitigation of those impacts must be addressed prior to development of the property. Prior to future development of the property,the future dcveloper(s) shall prepare at their own expense a detailed traffic analysis repori(s)evaluating existing capacity of existing streets in the area. 9. Waiver of Right-to-Pralest Special Improvement Districts Landowner has executed a Waiver of Right-to-Protest Creation'of Special Improvement Districts for a City-wide Park Maintenance District,which would provide a mechanism for the fair • and equitable assessment of maintenance costs for City parks, and for street improvements, including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk and storm drainage, to a) Baxter Lane b) West Oak Street;c) Fowler Avenue; and d) North 27th Avenue; and for signalization improvements at the intersections of West Oak Street and North 19th Avenue, and of Baxter Lane and North 19th Avenue; and have further executed a Waiver of Right-to-Protest Creation of Rural Improvement Districts for West Oak Street.-Said Waivers are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. 10. Utility]easements. Landowner understands and agrees that utility easements,a minimum of 30 feet in width, will be necessary for the installation and maintenance of water and sewer utility services to the annexed parcels. The Landowner shall create such easements in locations agreeable to the City during the appropriate development procedure, but in no event later than the filing of any final plat or site plan or issuance of a building permit on any of the parcels. 11. RiCht-of-Way/13asement for Future Roadways. Landowner has dedicated,by written easement,the following land to the City of Bozeman • for right-of-way purposes, which represent Landowner's proportionate share of the necessary XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Page 5 right-of-way. Said casements will be filed with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder at the • time this Annexation Agreement is filed. a) 45-feet for Baxter Lane b) 65-feet for Oak Street c) 32:5-feet for North 27th Avenue d) 50-feet for Fowler Avenue 12. Stormwater Master Plan. Landowner understands and agrees that a Stormwater Master Plan for the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION for a system designed to remove solids,oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the public streets must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer at the time of any future development. The master plan must depict the maximum sired retention/detention basin location and locate and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the area to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel(s). The plan shall include side grading and elevation information,typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details,basin siring calculations,and Stormwater maintenance plan. • 13. Additional Terms of Waivers. to The parties recognize that these documents shall be filed and of record with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder prior to the sale of any land within the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION. The parties further agree that the City may file these documents at any time. 14. Reserved Sewer Canncify. Landowner has proyided the City$74.748.80 as the payback required appurtenant to the real property hercinabove described for Special Improvement District 621. In recognition of this receipt,that portion of the XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION tract which is served by gravity sewers, shall he entitled to reserved sewer capacity in the original Far West Sewer Trunk line. The total amount of reserved sewer capacity in the trunk line shall be 307,200 gallons average daily flow (based on a residential density of six units per acre, a maximum total of 960 residential dwellings units, and an average flow rate of 320 gallons per residential dwelling unit • per day.) XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Page 6 15. Governine Law and Venue. • This Agreement Shull he construed under and governed by the laws of the state of Montana.In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement,venue is in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court,Gallatin County,State of Montana. 16. Attorney's Tees. In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs,to include the salary and costs of in-house counsel including City Attorney. 17. Waiver. No waiver by either party of ariy breach of any term, covenant or. agreement shall be deemed a waiver of the same or any subsequent breach of this same or any other term,covenant or agreement. No covenant, term or agreement shall be deemed waived by either party unless waived in writing. 18. invalid Provision. • The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the j '► other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. 19. Modifications or Alterations. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid unless evidenced by a writing signed by the parties-hereto. 20. No Assienment, It is expressly agreed that the Landowner shall not assign this Agreement in whole or in part without prior written consent of the City. 21. Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective heirs,successors and assigns. 22. Covenants to Run with the Land. The parties intend that the terms of this Agreement shall be covenants running with the • land and shall not expire at their deaths or upon transfer of ownership of the property. XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Page 7 The undersigned Landowners affirms that they have authority to enter into this Agreement • on behalf of their partnership,and to bind the partnership to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. LANDOWNER XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP A Montana Limited Partnership By: THOMAS E.LANE Its: Genera]- Partner By: RO ERT D.LANE . Its• General Partner STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss • County of Gallatin ) On this 25thday of Noverrber , 19_97_,before me,a Notary Public for the ,State of Montana,personally appeared THOMAS E.LANE AND ROBERT D.LANE,known to me to the General Partners of XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Montana limited partnership,and acknowledged to me that they executed this instrument on behalf of said limited partnership pursuant to the power and authority vested in them. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal as of the day and year first above written. Notary Publi 'or the State of Montana (Seal) Residing: Bozeman Commission Expires: 12/21/99 CITY OF BOZEMAN By:Clark Johnson,City Manager ATTEST:. 9 .O Clerk of the City Commission XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Page 8 EXHIBIT"B" WAIVER OIL itigi•IT TO PROTEST • CREATION Or RURAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS FOR PAVEMENT,CURB,GIJTTER,SIDEWALK,BOULEVARD AND DRAINAGE TO BAXTER LANE XI.LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION The undersigned owner of the real property situated in the County of Gallatin, State of Montana,and more particularly described as follows: Northwest one-quarter of Section 2,Township 2 South, Range 5 East, M.P.M., Gallatin County,Montana IN CONSIDERATION of receiving approval for annexation of the subject property from the City of Bozeman, along with accompanying rights and privileges and for other and.valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in recognition of the impact to Baxter Lane which will be caused by the development of the above-described property, has waived and do hereby waive for itself, its successors and assigns, the right to protest the creation of one or more rural improvement districts for paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements to Baxter Lane,or to make any written protest against the size or area or creation of the district be assessed in response to a duly passed resolution of intention to create one or • more rural improvement districts which would include the above-described property. This waiver shall be a covenant running with the land and shall not expire with the dissolution of the limited partnership,provided however this waiver shall apply to the lands herein described. The terms, covenants anti provisions of the Waiver shall extend to, and be binding'upon the successors-in-interest and assigns of the parties hereto. DATED this 1st day of December , 1997. ' XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP A Montana Limited Partnership THOMAS E.LANE Its: General Partner By: .l r.� CZru ROBERT D.LANE Its: Generbl Partner XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT. Page 12 • STATE OF MONTANA) ss County of Gallatin ) On this 25th day of Novenber , 1997., before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared THOMAS E.LANE and ROBERT D.LANE,known to me to be the Gew-ral Partners of XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,a Montana limited partnership and acknowledged to me that they executed this instrument on behalf of said limited partnership pursuant to the power and authority vested in them. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and set my seal on the date noted above. &V Notary Public r State of Montana (Seal) Residing at Bozeman My Commission Expires: 12/21/99 • XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Page 13• • 0 COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.3216 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN. MONTANA, EXTENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY,TO BE KNOWN AS THE BAXTER LANE ANNEXATION (AND FORMERLY REFERRED TO AS THE XL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNEXATION REQUEST) AND HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman received a request for annexation,from Joseph W. Sabol on behalf of XL Limited Partnership, owner of the tract,requesting the City Commission to extend the boundaries of the City of Bozeman so as to include a certain contiguous tract of land located West Oak Street extended and Baxter Lane,immediately west of Annie Subdivision, in the County of Gallatin, State of Montana; and WHEREAS, an annexation staff report has been prepared in accordance with the Commission's goals and policies for annexation and was presented to the Commission on June 16, -1997; and WHEREAS, Commission Resolution No.3184 was adopted by the City Commission on June 16, 1997, declaring it to be the intent of the City of Bozeman to extend the boundaries of said City so as to include said contiguous tract within the corporate limits of the City; and • WHEREAS, a public hearing on Commission Resolution No.3184 was duly noticed and opened -on July 21; 1997; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was continued to August 11, 1.997,at which time it was conducted; and WHEREAS, no objections to said annexation were raised at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City did not receive any written protest from the real property owners of the area to be annexed; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 1997,the Commission authorized and directed staff, upon satisfaction by the applicant of the conditions of approval,to prepare the necessary documents to proceed with the annexation of this tract in accordance with Commission Resolution No. 3184; and WHEREAS, the provision of available services including, but not limited to, rights-of- way, easements, water.rights or cash in lieu, waivers of protest against creation of SID's and water and sewer hookup fees, to said contiguous tract is the subject of a written agreement • between the City and Thomas E. Lane and Robert D. Lane, partners in XL Limited Partnership, record owner of the tract; and Fryo-19 Rl a°•1 , WHEREAS, said contiguous tract is the subject of a plat or Certificate of Survey, filed in the office of the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office; and • WHEREAS, the Bozeman City Commission hereby finds that the annexation of this contiguous tract is in the best interests of the City of Bozeman and the inhabitants thereof and of the inhabitants of the contiguous tract. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana: Section 1 That it is hereby declared that, pursuant to Title 7, Chapter 2, Part 43, M.C.A., the following-described property, which is contiguous to the municipal boundaries of.the City of Bozeman, be annexed to the City of Bozeman and that the boundaries of said City shall be extended so as to embrace and include such 160t acres of land, to wit: Northwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, Gallatin County, Montana. Section 2 The effective date of this annexation is December 31, 1997. Section as The annexation of the above-described tract is subject to the terms of the Agreement dated December 1, 1997, by and between the City of Bozeman and Thomas E. Lane and Robert D. Lane, partners in XL Limited Partnership. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 1 st day of December 1997. G DOME. STUECK, Mayor ATTEST: ROBIN L. SULLIVAN Clerk of the Commission APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4LJ. &W City Attor y - 2- i F KOC 2 M N NV3 =Wa mom z o � o Qj J< 5 O O 7r J A WACr Or wo a x 69"MMr OL-CLYf10 V or>r<illa,L T—&2.ml RAW$L-L rJ14 . O unc 2:7YE 3nKaY 7*mrrr,WKTA"msc r.R7oaNLr 3C ooa..m u ralm - -- —.—.—.—.—.—. .— — — — ——._sr�s —.—.—.—.— — —.—.— n7tv..,r AT x NO7,MOT oo.a ar L,7o tQaa,•L .� �o. sass wm x turn tQeo,uc s am L ®:—•—•—• —•ROM ilri is'—•.T -•—•—•—• 7.n,.,rssrr fasi• cprm c 4r alr►L .00 x mnnarc s u+m wo BA%TFR L14rC p=ALA wiiR cw ,�•mnm L mrc 'mt-'cr i w �tr N L. m ,ma;c maim, I� J S O I�ID 6O s•W 4 lort MOC x wf-Of fre-EMI IK s 67oi1 L fta Mob�pNRm m��al amlal►Y I�A K n I *ONE"AM 1w wwr_LNL i{C rao m Cr 2UL OW VD I � 1. i3O dlCl O<aRA,6 Yf..>sl•00 WK m,= P pit « ggbh i� C,V W o S I t NWI/4 5EC2 < �a I J I �cP x�T V ,L %EST St+r_a TF.0 4 i�r r� L•T... I =i11_O Oft wEM PDN£P. -J-•�._�• � _-'�=• :,N I' 2�{ ' �' �a' ANNEXATION MAP FOR L.r NSL'^•24•C JSJ9.�.T _L N �;:'�.�.}'•�i F`h =1 ,,.,.,. o _y.: - XL LIMITED PARTNERSHI 77rs= OAKT�.-°� � J viCiNtTtr MAP NW1/4 SECTION 2 EAa N T28 R5E N v.+wAlA BETTY GAr.—WAY W er-D P.4ri)NERSHIP SCALE, V- 200' : �(p�R SO = ALUASIPPEL usr (coFooN eoE) LAND OWNERS, k ,DOTE'0 PiRME — -• W PROP03D -MCYAS C LAM_° m Q. tI-Y3 JmvtLl�l. .Vb..t.�L O(i R O�/ fY.W W YfJe Appendix L A P P TRAFFIC REPORT . N D I X L i • • Traffic Impact Study For West Winds Planned Community Preliminary PUD Application Phase I Subdivision Prepared For: • Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman, MT 59718 Prepared By: HKM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 March 2004 04S067.110 • Traffic Impact Stp- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana TABLE OF CONTENTS L. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................7 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................................................................10 ADJACENTLAND USE.....................................................................................................10 REGIONALACCESS.........................................................................................................10 AREAROADWAYS...........................................................................................................10 STUDY INTERSECTIONS...................:..............................:..............................................13 SITEACCESS...................................................................................................................13 III. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS..............................................................................................14 BACKGROUNDTRAFFIC.................................................................................................14 TRIPGENERATION..........................................................................................................17 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENTS .....................................................................19 IV. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................28 • INTERSECTION CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE ..................................................28 TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM PHASE 1................................................................................32 TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM BUILDOUT.............................................................................33 WARRANTANALYSIS......................................................................................................35. V. REVIEW OF COLLSION DATA......................................................................................35 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................36 March 2004 6'M`2if�i 1+i E.E li 4lJ� ` Page 2 of 40 • Traffic Impact St - West Winds Community p Y Y Bozeman, Montana LIST OF TABLES Table1 - Study Intersections ....................................................................................................13 Table 3 - Level-of-Service Criteria ............................................................................................28 Table 4 - Level-of-Service Summary for Signalized Intersections .............................................30 Table 5 - Level-of-Service Summary for Minor Street Stop-Controlled Intersections.................31 Table 6 - 2007 Phase 1 Site Drive Access Points.....................................................................31 Table 7. Phase 1 Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume.........................................33 Table 8. Buildout Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume.........................................34 Table9. Collision Rates............................................................................................................35 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 -Vicinity Map................................................................................................................8 Figure2 - Conceptual Site Map ..................................................................................................9 Figure 3 - Existing Lane Configuration and Control...................................................................11 Figure 4 - Existing Peak Hour Traffic........................................................................................15 Figure 5 - 2007 Background Traffic...........................................................................................16 Figure 6 -Trip Distribution (Buildout) ........................................................................................21 Figure 7 -Trip Distributions (Buildout).......................................................................................22 Figure8 - Phase 1 Site Trips ....................................................................................................23 Figure 9 - 2007 Background Plus Phase 1.................................................................................24 Figure 10 - 2014 Background Including Phase 1.......................................................................25 Figure 11 - Buildout Site Trips...................................................................................................26 Figure 12 - 2014 Background Plus Buildout..............................................................................27 APPENDIX w • i March 2004 fi•M`�I 1 TI fi.E A 1 Y.I 6' �i Page 3 of 40 TRIP GENER. Y Traffic Impact Stuuy- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This traffic study evaluates the traffic impacts of the proposed West Winds Community subdivision located in the Northwest % of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, PMM, Bozeman, Montana, and contained between Davis Lane and North 271h Avenue, and Baxter Lane and Oak Street. The project will be developed through multiple phases, depending on market conditions, and is planned to consist of single-family homes (43.5% of the site trips), townhouses and condos (23.1% of.the site trips), apartments (22.0% of the site trips), and by the senior/assisted housing (11.6% of the site trips). The development will also include a linear park, and a future neighborhood community center. The developer proposes to begin construction in 2004, and the project is expected to be completed by 2014. Access to the site will be provided by 12 proposed drive access points to Baxter Lane, North 27`h Avenue, Oak Street, and Davis Lane. Phase 1 will develop 3 drive access points at North 171h Avenue/Tschache Lane, North 271h Avenue, Breeze Lane, and at Oak Street/Buckrake Avenue. Phase 1 is expected to generate 102 trips in the AM peak hour, and 127 trips in the PM peak hour. The remaining phases (project buildout) are expected to generate 267 trips in the AM peak hour, and 352 trips in the PM peak hour. Four signalized intersections, and three unsignalized intersections have been identified for traffic analysis by the City of Bozeman. These study intersections are North 19'h Avenue at Durston Road, North 19`h Avenue at Oak Street, North 19`h Avenue at Tschache Lane, North 19th Avenue at Baxter Lane, Oak Street at North 27'h Avenue, Baxter Lane at North 27`h Avenue, and Baxter Lane at Davis Lane. A future intersection at Oak Street / Davis Lane was not specifically evaluated as future conditions at this intersection are unknown. Analyses were completed for a Phase 1 scenario and a Buildout scenario, which includes Phase 1 site trips. Analysis indicates that the study intersections can be expected to operate at satisfactory LOS's with site trips, except for the intersection of North 19th Avenue at Durston Road during all scenarios (existing through buildout), and the intersection of North 19'h Avenue at Oak Street during the buildout condition. The North 19`h Avenue / Durston Road intersection currently operates -at a poor LOS, and will continue to degrade regardless of project trips. Regional improvements to this intersection, and the Durston Road corridor, will be necessary. The North 19`h Avenue / Oak Street intersection has a high volume westbound left turning movement March 2004 Page 4 of 40 644d 6'11d E.E'A f i4-'6• i�� Traffic Impact S_ .y- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana which is currently approaching capacity. Increases to this movement based on anticipated area growth rates will degrade the LOS of the intersection regardless of project trips. Warrant analyses were not conducted for this study, as each of the unsignalized study intersections is expected to operate at satisfactory levels of service. Accident data was requested from the Montana Department of Transportation for the study intersections. The proposed project is not. expected to adversely impact the safety of these intersections. Study conclusions and recommendations are summarized as follows: • No mitigation to the existing roadway system beyond planned improvements to Oak Street, Davis Lane, Baxter Lane, and North 271h Avenue is necessary due to the additional traffic generated by the proposed development. • Improvements to adjacent streets should be constructed to City of Bozeman approved street standards. • Site drive accesses should be developed according to local standards, should incorporate appropriate throat depths, and provide for the safe passage of pedestrians across the drive access. • Exclusive right-turn lanes at site drive accesses are not considered necessary or warranted as right-turn demands are predicted to be below 100 vehicles per day. • Left turn demand on the east leg of the North 191h Avenue and Oak Street intersection is projected to exceed 300 vehicles per day, regardless of project development. This volume is generally cited as a guideline towards the development of a dual left-turn lane, and should be considered by the City of Bozeman as a future regional improvement. • Analysis of the capacity issues along Durston Road and at the intersection of North 19`h Avenue at Durston Road indicates that signal improvements would not improve the expected LOS of F. Although improvements to Durston Road are currently planned and March 2004 koa 1 7+f E.E.F M1I G- i Page 5 of 40 • Traffic Impact A- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana will include the addition of a two-way left turn (TWLT) lane; these improvements will do little to improve the LOS along the corridor, or at its intersection with North 19'' Avenue. Regardless, as additional east-west and north-south arterials and collectors are developed adjacent to Durston Road, demand along Durston Road can be expected to stabilize. • Developer funding participation for a future signalized intersection at Oak Street and North 27th Avenue should be considered at a rate equal.to the percentage of "conflicting critical movement" site traffic to the total expected capacity of the travel lane. Means of potential funding for a signal at Oak Street and North 27th Avenue include traffic impact funds, private funding, or a SID. Should a signal be warranted at a later date, a SID appears to be the preferred means of funding. An SID would allow proper proportioning of impact and benefit to the users. The West Winds Developer is agreeable to a "Waiver of Protest to SID"for the potential signal improvements at this intersection. March 2004 Page 6 of 40 • Tragic Impact S*- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana I. INTRODUCTION This study evaluates the traffic impacts associated with the development of the West Winds Planned Community subdivision. The West Winds site consists of approximately 160 acres, occupying the entire undeveloped parcel bounded by Baxter Lane to the north, Oak Street to the south, and the future extensions of Davis Lane to the west and North 27`h Avenue to the east, legally described as the Northwest % of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, PMM, Bozeman, Montana. A vicinity map depicting the location of the subdivision relative to the regions transportation system is presented in Figure 1. The subdivision is expected to incorporate single-family homes, townhouses, apartments, low- income multi-family housing, senior residential, assisted-care senior residential, a future neighborhood community center, and a park. The entire site is currently zoned R-3 'Residential Medium Destiny" and is wholly contained within the Bozeman city limits. Adjoined zoning is primarily residential with the exception of B-1 zoning to the northeast and northwest of the project. A full size conceptual site map depicting the proposed subdivision layout in enclosed with this report, and a reduced depiction is presented in Figure 2. Traffic impacts of the West Winds subdivision have been analyzed based on two scenarios. The Initial scenario will consist of Phase 1A and Phase 1B development and is expected to include single-family homes, townhouses, and low-income multi-family housing generally located within the southeast corner of the subdivision. This phase will encompass approximately 31 acres, and is expected to be completed by 2007. The Buildout scenario will develop the remainder of the site, and will be gradually developed depending on current and future market conditions, but is expected to be completed by 2014. March 2004 fi-,��717+1 fi•E A kNa- :� Page 7 of 40 z E�If�� . �� /O x 44 cn - ^Fowler Avenue '" Davis Lane ••• ��� �.. N� _ -- 'W27th'Avenue'-' '. Thomas Drive s �.; N 19thlAve,nue�''" NJ19th"Avenuet�-.�� ic • 1 - 1 CD C/) (C) F7- �- ;r-� T'•tIl ' < .2 .`x.`�� .fit. o • TraffAipact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana 34 - - -�1 i � L '+ - 3� L LI — — _ +-35 — — — — — — — —BAXTER LANE (M/NOR ARTERUAL) ' '1w smart _� _—_ 3 3 I W-g-,"' '\'1 SJ,82J 5Q R. J2,OJe eC.fT.� —I I sl 1 fif�DENTB—'--taE---- P-4 -��- d�•�G' I it i4-sF-10 _ G•._ \ — — -I- — ,'^ .ot�NE— — �I I "T8249T50: - - —84,0{t-8IX'Ff.'�•= — /-a5t- 1--�1oz��--{— I I I 1 I I P-3 _a —I.--i12e1S.0.S-50.`ii+ �~ a 274,112 —_ ��•---- NCC- �- � 1.39�Av� \ I I 1 IM-SF-1 I I I W-if-2' II - WI - •- I - -r3Je10 s¢;'r[; -aeiao sa rt - '� # P-2 I of - - - - 1-4 02 �0W 14 WI _jTrMI . , s-eIII= JI -ME3MIUVE I I ii : . I I'll��lj�'fI�UL�� �" aM1 ',\• A. I Wr I II I C 264,J89$Q I {a2Je;Sa rt. I I: 1 I _ _ - -- OAK STREET !PR/NC/PAL ARTERIAL) - -- - - -- - ---- — — -- ....__... ... . I .::�::..............._.... � III i I I i\ ....... .. .. -I I i.... ._ .. .. I j I I jl I CENTER OF S. 2 � Figure 2, Proposed Site Map • Traffic Impact S*- West Winds Community- Bozeman, Montana • II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ADJACENT LAND USE West Winds is surrounded by a variety of land use that can be generalized as residential mixed use. The site is generally flat, is bisected north to south by a lateral of the Farmers Ditch Canal, and is currently bounded by either planned or existing residential development and undeveloped farm and ranch land. The site is bordered to the west by a 100-acre Regional Park and the planned Baxter Meadows; to the south by multi-family (Castlebar Apartments) and single-family (Harvest Creek Subdivision) development; to the east by two larger vacant parcels (10 and 20 acres) for the future Rose Park and High Gate Project (45-50 unit senior project); and to the north by larger rural tract (1 acre and larger) properties with the exception of the recently approved Baxter Square Subdivision, consisting of a 104-lot townhouse project with 3000 SF lots. The mixed uses and density proposed by the West Winds Community is consistent with existing adjacent land uses. REGIONAL ACCESS Regional access to the West Winds Community site will be provided primarily by North 191h Avenue corridor. Baxter Lane, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, Davis Lane, and North 27th Avenue will provide local access to the site. Existing lane configurations and control at key intersections along these routes are depicted in Figure 3. AREA ROADWAYS Baxter Lane is classified as an east-west minor arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, and incorporates a single lane in each direction within the vicinity of this project. The road is currently paved to roughly a 24-foot width with12-foot travel lanes and no discernable shoulder. Baxter Lane intersects North 191h Avenue at a signalized intersection and is side- street stop controlled within the vicinity of this project. Based on intersection turning movement counts, Baxter Lane has an estimated 2003 average daily traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 1800 vpd adjacent to the project site. March 2004 44i4G � Page 10 of 40 6�Y+''Qf .Ei1111�1�6'• r� � I I Davis Lane ' h CD N 27th Avenue x_ _ _ _ _ � j (Thomas Drive N 27th Avenue AML cQ Q Iy M g I = v o I `D (p Ori v CQ c� c CD .Z � �° �- Q N 19th Avenue cn D CD Q -�. `��► N 19th Avenue -�► `�t �' ® _ o ° r ® r ® �3 o, . 0 • Traffic Impact S*- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana Tschache Lane is classified as a local street within the Bozeman transportation network, and does not currently extend to the project site. Future improvements are expected to occur with the development of parcels east of the project site, which will extend Tschache Lane to North 27`h Avenue. Currently, Tschache Lane intersects North 19`h Avenue at a signalized intersection. Based on intersection turning movement counts, Tschache Lane has an estimated 2003 ADT volume of approximately 1250 vpd just west of North 19`h Avenue. Oak Street is classified as an east-west principal arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, and is partially improved to a half standard adjacent to this project. Future planned improvement will incorporate a 4-lane section with a raised median and left turn bays. Oak Street intersects North 19'h Avenue at a signalized intersection, and is side-street stop controlled within the vicinity of the project. Based on intersection turning movement counts, Oak Street has an estimated 2003 ADT volume of approximately 3400 vpd just west of North 19'h Avenue and 1450 vpd adjacent to the project site. Davis Lane is classified as a north-south minor arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, although an improved street does not currently exist adjacent to the site. Currently, improvements to Davis Lane consist of a 24-foot gravel surface that begins at Baxter Lane and travels north. South of the site, the alignment of Davis Lane continues as Fowler Avenue. North 27`h Avenue is classified as a 2-lane north-south collector street within the Bozeman transportation network. Currently, improvements to North 27`h Avenue begin at Oak Street and travel south to Durston Road. Improvements to the street do not currently exist adjacent to the site. Based on intersection turning movement counts, North 27th Avenue has an estimated 2003 ADT volume of approximately 1050 vpd just south of Oak Street. North 19`h Avenue is classified as a north-south principle arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, and is currently the only major north-south running arterial within the immediate vicinity of the site. Recent improvements to North 19'h Avenue have developed the street to a 4-lane standard with a center left-turning median. Although not directly adjacent to the project site, this street will serve as a major conduit for site-developed trips. Based on intersection turning movement counts, North 19`h Avenue 2003 ADT volumes range from approximately 7900 vpd to 22300 vpd. March 2004 s ri"fit f iJ k.F'.A%_ � Page 12 of 40 Traffic Impact - West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana STUDY INTERSECTIONS The City of Bozeman identified 4 signalized intersections to be included in this study for traffic analysis. Additionally, 3 adjacent unsignalized intersections were included for analysis. These study intersections are identified in Table 1. Table 1 -Study Intersections Intersection �� Rr• L .�rr� _ ySignalized {Stop:Con"trolied North 19th Avenue/ Baxter Lane ✓ North 19'h Avenue/Tschache Lane ✓ North 19th Avenue/Oak Street ✓ North 19'h Avenue/ Durston Road ✓ Baxter Lane/ Davis Lane ✓ Baxter Lane/ North 27`h Avenue ✓ Oak Street/ North 27`h Avenue ✓ SITE ACCESS In addition to the 7 study intersections, 12 major access points are planned for the project site. Of those access points, 3 are planned for construction during Phase 1 development. The 3 site drive accesses are Buckrake Avenue at Oak Street, Breeze Lane at North 27`h Avenue, and Tschache Lane at North 27`h Avenue. The remaining 9 access points will be developed as necessary and as future demand dictates. Internal access will be provided through a series of local streets including extensions of Tschache Lane from the east and Hunters Way from the south. Depictions of the internal access roadway sections are provided in the Appendix of this report. March 2004 1�i MA Page 13 of 40 Tragic Impact Sto- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS BACKGROUND TRAFFIC HKM Engineering Inc. collected turning movement counts on Wednesday, December 10 and collected supplemental turning movement counts on Wednesday, December 17, 2003. Count data was collected for the following intersections: 1. North 191h Avenue and Baxter Lane 2. North 191h Avenue and Tschache Lane 3. North 19`h Avenue and Oak Street 4. North 191h Avenue and Durston Road 5. Baxter Lane and Davis Lane 6. Baxter Lane and North 27`h Avenue/Thomas Drive 7. Oak Street and North 27'�'Avenue The peak hour of the study area was calculated based on the peak hour of the system. Peak hour count data collected from these counts are summarized in Figure 4 as "Existing Peak Hour Traffic". This count data has been processed to reflect an expected 2007 equivalent volume, and is presented in Figure 5 as "2007 Background Traffic". Count data and volume tabulations are provided in Section One of the Appendices. Supplementary traffic volume data was also used from the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update. Based on discussions with the City of Bozeman, a growth rate of 3.0% per year was employed to determine 2007 and 2014 background volumes in an effort to estimate increases in demand due to the development of adjacent subdivisions and expected growth to the Bozeman area population. This growth rate is considered by HKM to be conservative, based on an evaluation of the adjacent street system including historic yearly ADT values presented in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update and considering the extent of demand already placed on the North 19`h Avenue corridor, which will tend to encourage alternate travel patters as demands increase. Regardless, this rate is utilized as the average growth rate per year for this study- March 2004 Page 14 of 40 E:N`O 1 74 E t t N 6= �� Traf&pact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana M Q rn > J lQ Q NOffH - �O O O r 00 Notm to Scale O N c'0 0 CN Z � `. Z N �P_M N ^N -42(74) o "-2(24) Baxter Lane. ° `0(9) V)CO c) '32(66) --53(71) J L --52(86) J 1 �. ( ) [1800] 1(18) [1800) oj1) [2500] 23(59)-J [3150) 43(83) I 43(83)-- I 2l(31)— "'n 43(83), [21100] 1 o `o(4 ) West Winds — — Tsc— — Lane -�� `0(16) 1 [1250] 7(28)J . � } r [1150] 1 Community} 1 1 (4)-- NqN 35(64)1 c 1 v 1 [18850] r 1 1 _ co L41(133) 16 164) W. Street `1621(3;4) 1 — — - — 1— — — [1450] 60(52)-- [3400] 78(120)� 1 } r 1 1 (2), M 127(103)— �;3-N o a 78(120), =�" c �0LO 1 no th N a� I [10250] o Q o 3 Q L0 O O 0) U. u N Z (192001 Z N N.— ? �' `146(217) n N Z --635(612) Durston Road � ,. `190 1161 [15600] 90(118)-/ 423(659)— o an 51 (56)-) N N o n P P M N Legend: o 60 (52) = AM Peak(PM Peak) 01 [1850) = Estimated ADT u Figure 4, Existing Peak Hour Traffic r.wiiti'•<Cw=;r:ra'iiiv;�•.:ter TPAFFIC VOLUME,, Z: I O 0—cn CD 0 I o ? Q 1 w o L12(10) (( (( Fowler Lane 1 i -7(8) Davis Lane i > — — — — — — — — —1 — — — — t 1 1 N [650] I N Q Q 1 O V D Q co 3 CD CDc CD CD o r c : a1 p, A � �O �, (2) N 27th Avenue N 27th Avenue I I ` r712) (Thomas Drive) — [1 150] o(3)J 1 1 I — — 1 r' [150] 55(37), mw C.-o N v �— � Iy cD g v 1 � N cn J N p ^ I 0 o W ; R3 V r r N CD C CD cn CD O W v V O X M O O :3 A N N 0J �� CD fD o W P L41 (28) co w cn P —965(1123) C Q 1? _ `1025(1014) J r43(26) N 19th Avenue ,Q C. N � U P W C. NU3(38) s9(73) -) 1 r' [251001 -t 6: k-86(50) ate= `51 (100) � 486(1183)— W —725(736) 36(69)0 N u - 326(249) cn c N 19th Avenue 91 (186)i y N 50(25)J o,S r—Ni m Q [8850] 84(90)J N r 16300 12(12► 542(995)— z J 1 !' v, 156 240 -- P [ ] 416(802)— ao v a [(8), 'o -tea 66(114) AN1' , 231 (194), uNcn J N 0.N U P O IV CT ---`� w-- CO 01 U . O n' 0 Traffic Impact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana TRIP GENERATION Project trip generation is based on trip generation rates as reported in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) most recent publication Trip Generation, 7h Edition. Trips were generated for each expected development type and correspond to the morning and evening peak hours of the adjacent street network. Generation estimates for the expected Phase 1 development were developed separately from the site buildout, although those trips are included in the site trip distribution estimates for the.buildout condition. Estimated trip generation for the project is presented in Table 2. Table 2 -West Winds Community Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Weekday Trips Trips Trips Trips Land Use Code' Qua.ntity Trip Ends Rate rTrIps I %In %Out In Out Rate I Trips I %In %Out I In Out PHASE Single Family Detached Housing 210 46 Units 440 0.75 35 25% 75% 9 26 1.01 46 63% 37% 29 17 Low-Income Multi-Family Residential 220 96 Units 645 0.51 49 20% 80% 10 39 0.62 60 65% 35% 39 21 ResidnetialCondominiumfrownhouse 230 40Units 234 0.44 18 17% 83% 3 15 0.52 21 57% 33% 14 7 SUBTOTAL(PHASE 1) 1319 102 22 80 127 82 45 BUILDOUT Single Family Detached Housing 210 167 Units 1598 0.75 125 25% 75% 31 94 1.01 169 64% 36% 108 61 Apartments 220 62Units 417 0.51 32 20% 80% 6 26 0.62 38 65% 35% 25 13 Low-Income Multi-Family Residential 230 101 Units 592 0.44 44 17% 83% 7 37 0.52 53 67% 33% 36 17 Residnetial Condominium/Townhouse 230 52 Units 305 0.44 23 1 17% 1 83% 4 19 0.52 27 1 67% 33% 18 9 Neighborhood Park 2 NA 4 Sites NA 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 Neighborhood Community Center NA 10.0 KSF NA 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 Senior Adult Housing-Attached 252 207 Units 720 0.08 17 45% 55% 8 9 0.11 23 61% 39% 14 9 Assisted Living 254 189 Beds 503 0.14 26 65% 35% 17 9 1 0.22 42 44% 56% 18 24 SUBTOTAL(PHASE II THRU J() 4135 267 73 194 352 219 133 TOTAL(BUILDOUT) 5454 369 95 274 479 301 178 Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook,7th Edition 2 Park will incorporate4 natural setting including wetlands and seasonal youth soccer practice fields(not regular soccer fields). Community Center is planned to be developed as a neighborhood meeting center and will not offer recreational activities or daily planned events. March 2004 Page 17 of 40 WE.I�E'N0'Y . Traffic Impact So- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana Of the estimated peak hour trips projected for generation by this development, 27.0% will be contributed by the Phase 1 development and the remaining site will contribute 73.0%. With respect to the overall development, 43.5% of the trips will be contributed by single-family homes, 23.1% by townhouses and condos, 22.0% by apartments, and 11.6% by the senior/assisted housing. The development of low-income multi-family residential units is expected along the eastern portion of the development. Although this development type is. not specifically identified within the generation tables of ITE's Trip Generation guidelines, the generator is expected to closely resemble both the "Apartment" generation (ITE Code 220) and the "Residential Condominium/Townhouse" generation (ITE Code 230). Based on expected development trends, trips for the low-income multi-family residential use have been generated based on these two ITE codes. The centerpiece of the West Winds Community is an expansive north/south linear park (West Winds Park) providing active and passive recreational opportunities as well as a proposed Neighborhood Community Center. The neighborhood park is expected to incorporate both unimproved and improved areas including level areas suitable for seasonal soccer practices. Included in the park is a planned neighborhood community center. The proposed neighborhood community center is expected to be a gathering place for residents to enjoy such activities as neighborhood barbecues or to host neighborhood meetings, and could be rented out for casual events such as wedding receptions, town meetings, etc. As both the park and the community center are anticipated to be used primarily by the West Winds subdivision, significant internal trip capture by the generators is anticipated. Moreover, large community parks are planned to the immediate east and west of the project site providing regional recreational opportunities for the immediate adjacent area. Lastly, significant bicycle and pedestrian access is anticipated from outside the subdivision. Although some trips can be expected to originate outside the development, they are generally expected to occur outside the weekday peak generation hour of the site or on weekends. As such, trip generation by the park and by the neighborhood community center is not included in the total generation for the project site. Should either the park or the community center experience a change in function, an addendum to the master traffic study may be required. March 2004 6M''Fxl N E.EY II N Page 18 of 40 • Traffic Impact Sey- West Winds'Community Bozeman, Montana Due to the residential nature of the project, assignments of the generated trips have been classified as having primary destinations with pass-by and diverted trips not anticipated'. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENTS Trip distribution percentages for the project site have been based on: existing Bozeman area traffic patterns as reflected in the turning movement counts taken at the study intersections; from information gathered in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update; from approved traffic studies adjacent to the project site; and from expected directions of travel to nearby existing commercial and office developments. Considering only the Phase I development, which assumes a less developed adjacent street network and development only in the southeast corner of the project site, trip distribution percentages were modified to reflect an adjusted distribution and a reduction in available site drive accesses. Trips entering or exiting the site are expected to use one of three site drive accesses located at Breeze Way/North 27`h Avenue, Buckrake Avenue/Oak Street, and Tschache Lane/North 271h Avenue. Of these trips, all will use the Oak Street/North 271h Avenue intersection. Over one-half of the Phase I trips are expected to exit the study area using the North 19a' Avenue corridor, while nearly an additional one-quarter of the Phase 1 trips are expected to cross North 19`h Avenue Oak Street. Considering the North 19'h Avenue trips, a three-quarters/one-quarter distribution favoring southbound North 19`h Avenue is anticipated in an effort to reach employment centers in and around Bozeman and the surrounding area. Of the total trips, 15% are anticipated to travel north or northwest of the development towards northern Bozeman, Belgrade, or to the Interstate 90 corridor. Phase I trip distribution characteristics are presented in Figure 6. At buildout, site trips are expected to exit the site from one of 12 different site access points located around the project site. Approximately one-half of all the project buildout trips generated by the site are expected to exit the study area using the.North 19`h Avenue corridor, while an additional one-quarter of the project buildout trips are expected to cross North 19'h Avenue at Baxter, Oak, and Tschache. Of.the North 19th Avenue trips, a four-fifths/one-fifth distribution Pass-by trips are those trips attracted from background traffic passing the site on adjacent roadways and as such,do not add new traffic to the adjacent street system. Diverted trips are trips attracted from background traffic volumes already on non-adjacent roadways in the vicinity of the project site. March 2004 Page 19 of 40 • Traffic Impact A- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana favoring southbound North 19'h Avenue is anticipated in an effort to reach employment centers in and around Bozeman and the surrounding area. Of the total trips, only 15% are anticipated to travel north or northwest of the development towards northern Bozeman, Belgrade, or to the Interstate 90 corridor. Project buildout trip distribution characteristics are presented in Figure 7. Site trips for the Phase 1 development and for the project buildout reflecting the above considerations and the trip.generation estimates are depicted in Figure 8. These site trips have been added to the projected background traffic estimates to yield anticipated demands at the completion of Phase 1, and are depicted in Figures 9 as "2007 Background Plus Phase 1", including average daily traffic (ADT) estimates based on the assumption that the PM peak hour demands are equivalent to 10% of the ADT. Background traffic estimates for the project buildout were estimated based on the 3% growth rate, a 2014 expected completion date, and static Phase 1 site trips, and is depicted in Figure 10 as "2014 Background Traffic". Site trips for the buildout condition reflecting the above considerations and the trip generation estimates are depicted in Figure 11. Project site trips for the buildout condition have been added to the projected 2014 background traffic estimate to yield anticipated demands at the completion of the development, and are depicted in Figure 12 as "2014 Background Plus Buildout", including average daily traffic (ADT) estimates. March 2004 Page 20 of 40 E.Ai4c. s •. TrApact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana " > J Q Q NOffH N a L E. = Not to Soae Z `. Z 0% 0% 150 � Baxter Lane .A. Community I Tschache Lane r- P x z PHASE n W. Oak Street ?c ?� d i > �. a J a�. Q Z 3 t� O ti LL N Z Durston Road �Q% lr5°o 2b% Figure 6, Trip Distribution - Phase 1 Z I " R is Fowler Lane — — — — r '"'' Davis Lane y `r 01 K . y _.. 3 Z` ye ct " � F N 27th Avenue C N 27th AvenueO ' 0o '. uo_x: (Thomas Drive ,. o �'+ :3 p CT 0 Q. O a, Z3 CD o}- 0 :' N 19th Avenue O 'Y co cn CD Z Yv N 19th Avenue - v � • TraAmpact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana > _ N NORTH !� to Scale .� cV t Not to Z 0 Z ~ N Baxter Lane j r0(1) I to I I I �est \)//inJs 1 _ _ Tschache Lane Community} Jo 2 c� T N R m 10�- `6(22;) W. Oak Street --s(18) 21 (12)-- 14(8)J `1 e(q)� 18(1 )- N 28(16)1 OD I � � � a � L Q N +L+ Z Z Durston Road `1((2) 10) �- :2 2(1)-- 1 } p. 2(1)1 N_P N } l� L8(30) 18(10)1 1 33(18), 1 } M 1 2 3 Legend; 60 (52) = AM Peak(PM Peak) Figure 8, Phase I Site Trips . Traffopact Study- West Winds'Community Bozeman, Montana c > > C J O ET > O Q O NO TH N ti Nt z z F... sCO N 00 N L47(83) —21 (64) `0(80 t) Baxter Lane J L —591(97) J } Q r36(75) 2050 48(200)J [ ] 0(1)J 26(66)J `) t f' [ ] 2000 48(93)— I [2800] 24(35)_ n a o [3500] 48(93) o, co N 0. a [23950] 7(52) 6, Tschache Lane West �inds — — — — — [1400] 85J [1300]Community 1( ) �N 39(721 oo� 2 T [21400] —� " �Lco t N �10(39) � � co --49(119) N 46(150) j` rla(72) W. Oak Street �;I` r1821(353) — — — I — — — 2050 89 70)J , t trzZ' 102(143)J 1 t 9(6)1 a c un 52(25), o ooVo a LO NO-I N V N L 3 [11850] U_ a�i Q o LO Q o N G z [217501 z sa 10v v?N N �-167(254) o co M a —716(691) o y J } r214(131) °° Durston Road 01 J } J ` `8(30) 101 (133)J '1 t —43(100) [17750] 478(743)-- Na; 18(10), op 59(64) °N P 33(18), v a 0(0)J , co-� LO a 69(61)— 1 2 3 0 N 01 Legend; 60 (52) = AM Peak(PM Peak) (1850] = Estimated ADT Figure9. 2007 Background Plus Phase I QEFf';b:{I.LJ;t:Q:7t`:I1Nf.�G•.,a Trampact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana as > > la Q L > to co Q ) O t 0O NORTH '> t9 N �+ r rya to scae 0) c7 E !V t Z Zco co =' �! `5(34) M o co `0(12) "`n-'^w`N-' L58(102) 2 o;;7 -73(98) o --72(119) 0 -27(81) f �. CO(0) Baxter Lane � f ` `1 (5) J i ` `44(91) [2500] 1 [ ](25)J f �' 2500 0(1)-J � f r [ ]3550 35(83)J ", f 60(115)-- o�o 60(115)-- ooM 31 (44)- omo [4350] 0(1)7 NO 0(0), OOUn 60(115), Nav C" Q Cl) O O [293001 N C''^ `8(64) �C' _ v _ �est �inc�s Tschache Lane � ` `0(22) Community [1800] * 132(6)J � f � [1600] MU 48(89)1 "N N M ,o= 0 [600] * [26150] _FF �O ON o- \-6(23) ^o N '-571184) 0 o N -58(138) a --62(208) J ` ` r22(89) W. Oak Street J j` `224(435) — — — 0(0)J �' f r 0 * 111(168)J f [2450] 101 (82)-- ^: [555 ] 192(152)-- OD 11 (9)-) M v a0 51 (24), `°a c`�v (Q O NNQ _J n CO L i [14450] U. ET CD 0 Q o Q LO 00 rn o N u Z u [26700] Z _v ao �a S"N '-204(308) o c N -880(851) J + N `263(161) Durston Road 125(164)J f r [21 900] 590(914) ao 6 o 78(82), �::c o �O�O N O O•CO Legend; 60 (52) = AM Peak(PM Peak) CV [1850] = Estimated ADT * = Future ADT expected to be higher due to adjacent improvements and anticipated connections. Figurel 0, 2014 Background (Incl, Phase 1 ) STraf opact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana C > > Q to NOgTH S (C Not to Sooie .� +, E Q> ti cV = Z ZH N" �6(4) --5(15) ,ON N. --1 (1) Baxter Lane `2(7) _) + --2(7) 1 (2)~ } 14(9)— 14(9)J } 0(1)-) V c 6(4)-- v N 10 •O Q N West Wins Tschache Lane 7 --1 (2) 4(3) CommuniL�1 J 1 t 7 2(1)w cNu-- 19(13), F�F "- `21(64) W. Oak Street J `13(39) 57(39)— -1 } 2(1).J 1 } 29(20), N O• 35(24)-- ui m >r s 0 48(33), w c: J I L 1L CD ; (D Q � � r I� Z N Z N f�O N L9(26) —2(7) Durston Road 1 (2)-/ -) } 6(4)-- 10(7), v 4:f60 (52) d; = AM Peak(PM Peak) Figurel 1 . Buildout Site Trips Traompact Study- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana d cv =ET 'L a=i O fA Q LONO TH Q fA O CO t co ti 0 N L Z Z F M P =:;F= L 11(38) ASS `0(12) '°--'n `58(102) -o --74(99) o; --77(134) N --27(81) r0(0) Baxter Lane .� L r3(12) J , ` r44(91) [2550] 1 (25) -) t r- 0(1)J � t r 3850 49(921 J ') t r' 61 (117)-- S N o [2700] 74(124)— S S F, [ ] 37(48)-- S N a [4400] 0(2)7 ^vo 0(0), 00� 60(115)� a-ov �v o, 0 •o N [294001 S� L8(64) West Winds Tschache Lane `oi22 Community [2200] * 174(7)- t o [1600] aN 67(1021� co^0) [1800] * —� [26500] Go —� o a co �79(20 �58(188) ( 1 v 0 —75(247) r22(89) W, Oak Street {` r224(435) — — — * 0(0)J 1 t r * 113(1691 J 1 t f- � [4000] 158(121)— vv: [7200] 227(176)— Sins = I 40(29)1 v v COo 99(57), a o N l� M-v J I !2 co N L N 3 i [15150] oU. Q LO > LOO LO Q co C) N N Z [27250] Z ^a N V �-213(334) o v N —882(858) J t ` r263(161) Durston Road 126(166) [22220] 596(918)-- o•M S 88(89) N OM v O r-N •-N Legend: 60 (52) = AM Peak(PM Peak) ET ' r [1850] = Estimated ADT N r- * = Future ADT expected to be higher due to adjacent improvements and anticipated connections. Figurel 2, 2014 Background Plus Buildout Traffic Impact S*- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana IV. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS INTERSECTION CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Intersection capacity analyses have been conducted using the procedures outlined in Part III, Chapters 16 "Signalized Intersections" and Chapter 17 "Unsignalized Intersections" of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM) and through the use of SYNCHRO traffic signal timing and analysis software and based on HCM delay, capacity, and level-of-service calculations. Calculation forms for the analyses are contained in Section Two of the Appendices. In accordance with the HCM procedures, Level-of-Service (LOS) has been determined by estimating the average vehicular delay of the intersections and the intersection movements. The range of traffic delays associated with each LOS is presented in Table 3 for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. It should be noted that delay thresholds for a given LOS for unsignalized intersections are lower than those given for signalized intersections. This difference, as explained in Chapter 17 of the 2000 HCM, is to account for the greater variability in delay associated with unsignalized movements and the different driver exceptions associates with each type of intersection control, with the expectation that signalized intersections are designed to carry higher traffic volumes and therefore will experience greater delay than an unsignalized intersection. Table 3 -Level-of-Service Criteria Signalized;lntersection . Unsignaliied-Intersectiori:= �:r "Average'Delay(sec/LOS veh)`I; ":Average,Delay,;°(sec'/'ueh),� �_y.� A <_ 10 _< 10 B > 10to20 > 10to15 C > 20 to 35 > 15 to 25 D > 35to55 > 25to35 E > 55 to 80 > 35 to 50 F > 80 > 50 March of 04 40 t-14-4,I.M fi E.. Page 28 of • Traffic Impact Ay- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana Analyses of intersections under signal control are summarized in Table 4 herein, representing a best-case scenario with optimized.signal cycle lengths and'intersection splits. The analysis indicates that all of the subject intersections can be expected to operate at a satisfactory LOS and with adequate capacity for the Phase I condition with the exception of the North 19" Avenue and Durston Road intersection, which exhibits LOS D and E in both the background and Phase 1 condition. In the Buildout condition, the intersection of North 19'h Avenue and Durston Road reaches LOS F and is unable to serve the volume of traffic that would be expected to use the roadway and the intersection based on anticipated growth rates (overcapacity). This intersection currently exhibits a high volume of east-west demand that cannot adequately be served by the existing facility. Although improvements are scheduled for Durston Road including the intersection with North 191h Avenue, right-of-way issues will fail to address the capacity problems already inherent to the roadway. Regardless of development at the West Winds Community site, consideration should be given to performing regional improvements to Durston Road to improve capacity and delay including the addition of a second thru lane eastbound and westbound, and an exclusive right turn lane on the east leg of the North 191h Avenue/Durston Road intersection. It should be noted, however, that as other nearby east-west roadways are developed and as • .motorists choose to use alternate routes due to delay and queue issues along Durston Road, that demand along Durston Road could stabilize. The intersection of North 191h Avenue and Oak Street reaches LOS E, and based on capacity calculations, is unable to serve the volume of traffic that would be expected to use the intersection based on anticipated growth rates (overcapacity). This intersection currently exhibits a high volume of left-turn demand on the east leg of the intersection that cannot adequately be served by the existing intersection configuration. Degradation of this intersection would occur regardless of proposed project, as this movement is not used by the expected site trips. Analyses of the unsignalized intersections and Phase I drive accesses are summarized in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively, and indicate that all of the subject intersection can be expected to operate of a satisfactory LOS with adequate capacity for the Phase I condition. The remaining site drive accesses for the Buildout condition were not specifically analyzed due to the planning nature of the future phases, but are all expected to operate at a satisfactory LOS and with March 2004 Page 29 of 40 L.O. S. Traffic Impact Si, y- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana adequate capacity based on the volume of trips expected to be generated in the AM and PM peak hours, and expected cross street volumes. The unsignalized intersections in the Buildout condition are expected to operate at a satisfactory LOS and with adequate capacity. Regardless, as future phases of development are planned, updates to this master traffic study may be necessary to evaluate the site drive accesses for those phases. Table 4-Level-of-Service Summary for Signalized Intersections ...a. t,...t .f-_. rfF '+. r 1(•' ..ant .t;.rkrsey.•. u T" �. s• .�'" ,1 ; +- �,r ' � ��v. •�...�' r,� ,� .+•+ tnVV' '4�' •n,•�Nr� " AM'Peak Hour FM�,Peak Hour Irite�rse on' �;e `y rTraffi .0 d on w..._ � _ Y •j s'.- Y�{ "y- C +'x- -1 9Nx'✓': Vlc Delay a�LOFS VIc Qi r� T I� 2007 Background 0.82 55.9 E 0.93 50.5 D 2007 Background + Phase 1 0.84 58.3 E 0.92 76.2 E N. 19th Ave.and Durston Rd.2 2014 Background Incl. Phase 1 OVER 108.0 F OVER 163.7 .. F 2014 Buildout OVER 111.8 F OVER 177.9 F 2007 Background 0.47 15.6 B 0.87 34.3 C 2007 Background +Phase 1 0.50 16.8 B 0.88 34.9 C N. 19th Ave. and Oak St. 2014 Background Incl. Phase 1 0.68 20.5 C 1.00 55.9 E 2014 Buildout 0.75 26.7 C OVER 69.2 E 2007 Background 0.37 3.2 A 0.46 6.1 A 2007 Background +Phase 1 0.38 3.2 A 0.46 6.1 A N. 19th Ave. and Tschache Ln. 2014 Background Incl. Phase 1 0.48 4.1 A 0.55 7.4 A 2014 Buildout 0.50 5.2 A 0.57 7.7 A 2007 Background 0.48 8.1 A 0.64 12.5 B 2007 Background + Phase 1 0.48 7.9 A 0.65 12.6 B N. 19th Ave.and Baxter Ln. 2014 Background Incl. Phase 1 0.62 10 B 0.82 21.7 C 2014 Buildout 0.64 10.3 B 0.83 22.9 C z Regional improvements prior to project buildout will be necessary to alleviate capacity problems on Durston Road regardless of development by this project- March 2004 a a f^N E•"-" r�'aT Page 30 of 40 Traffic Impact SL__,y- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana Table 5 - Level-of-Service Summary for Minor Street Stop-Controlled Intersections -�'"'y�iR±t+:%` ;_••-^r�•,� - .,- �:..�. n�z.--.��,li" ';:-r2X.`.`k �',s..�5.'��- -;._,. xZ-•,,v ,�a;o,-s ft `�• � �*a � :� Worst=Case�Ap�roach• 'nterse Trafric Gondition,f; r AMf eakFio�u M Peaky o° r t •--.c :'`' "'lei a-a Tina•.x; 7. 1z n c�ti�K Q3���.� i f�as :4�•. '.�d�:Ss'4L-v�.. �.�'?:k.. * �' 7�i�"�':.s':�.����:FZ•�'F•> '�". •SDi�e,l`�a+'•-,y'cx.."E.j- :OSaa.r. ' eal�y L�OSS 2007 Background 8.9 A 9.4 A 2007 Background +Phase 1 8.9 A 9.4 A Baxter-Ln. and Fowler/Davis 2014 Background Incl. Phase 1 9.8 A 11.2 B 2014 Buildout 9.9 A 11.3 B 2007 Background 9.1 A 9.3 A 2007 Background +Phase 1 9.1 A 9.3 A Baxter Ln.and N.27th Ave. 2014 Background Incl. Phase 1 9.4 A 9.7 A 2014 Buildout 9.6 A 10.0 A 2007 Background 8.8 A 8.9 A 2007 Background +Phase 1 10.8 B 12.8 B W.Oak St.and N..27th Ave. 2014 Background Incl. Phase 1 10.9 B 13.4 B 2014 Buildout 12.2 B 16.6 C Table 6 -2007 Phase 1 Site Drive Access Points 3..-.�.,.l � o w-• ,;Intersection mil. f`{ TrafficConditionsAMiPea 'ksHo.e, '•� 9 s.k�t '?"����� TF �^�" �6� �3.#l�` •. S tw.1"v �l�L�..lPOli. .�411 LsOSDelajr " 0�: RN s � Ja:�l� �M`Nµ � '�.'�,w-� .;7:.5 � y�:i r�x�r.-`:'t4�23j�� d J.'.,ftr.�•Y' ;-t-��-`"s.�;.w���`�"ti L � 2007 Background NA NA NA NA W.Oak St.and Buckrake Ave. 2007 Background + Phase 1 9.1 A 9.5 A 2007 Background NA NA NA NA N.27t"Avenue and Tschache Ln. 2007 Background +Phase-1 8.4 A 8.4 A 2007 Background NA NA NA NA N.27'"Avenue and Breeze Ln. 2007 Background + Phase 1 8.5 A 8.4 A March 2004 Page 31 of 40 Traffic Impact So- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana • TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM PHASE 1 Phase I of the West Winds Community is scheduled to begin construction in 2004, with substantial completion by 2007. Road improvements adjacent to the Phase 1 development will to Oak Street from North 271h Avenue to Buckrack Avenue, and to North 27'h Avenue from Oak Street to Tschache Lane. Tschache Lane is not expected to be completed between North 19th Avenue and North 27`h Avenue by the development of Phase 1. As such, 100% of the estimated trips generated by the Phase 1 development will exit the area using the Oak Street/North 27'h Avenue intersection, representing approximately one-third of the expected intersections peak hour volume. As demonstrated by the unsignalized intersection LOS analysis, no significant impacts to the study area are anticipated by the development of Phase 1. The analysis of the signalized intersections also does not indicated significant impacts to the study area, except for poor LOS at the intersections of North 19th Avenue with Durston Road and at the intersection of North 19'h Avenue with Oak Street, regardless of Phase 1 development. A review of the worse-case traffic impacts to the North 19`h Avenue I Durston Road intersection and the North 19'h Avenue / Oak • Street intersection by Phase 1 trips indicate impacts of 1.7% and 3.6%, respectively, to the total intersection volume, and worse case impacts to the North 191h Avenue / Durston Road intersection and the North 191h Avenue I Oak Street intersection capacity of 2.4% and 1.1%, respectively.3 Very little change in intersection delay is expected. Examining each individual intersection reveals that degradation of the North 19'h Avenue and Oak Street intersection can be contributed to a high east-leg left turning movement of approximately 353 vehicles in the PM peak hour, of which the Phase 1 trips do not contribute. Improvements to this intersection are not included in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update, although consideration by the City should be given to incorporating a second westbound left turn lane and split intersection phasing to improve delay and capacity. The degradation of North 191h Avenue and Durston Road intersection can be contributed to a high volume of east-west through traffic, regardless of trips contributed by Phase 1. Although regional improvements have been recommended for Durston Road to upgrade the roadway section from 2-lanes to 3-lanes, these improvements do not address the need for additional 3 As a percent change between the Background capacity and the Background Plus Phase 1 capacity. March 2004 6 YY 1 7J H.E R f rI a Page 32 of 40 Traffic Impacty- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana capacity along the route. However, as additional east-west roadways are developed in the area, • motorists may take alternate routes thus leveling the capacity issues along Durston Road. A summary of traffic impacts to each of the study intersections by Phase 1 of the West Winds Community is provided in Table 7. Table 7. Phase 1 Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume Intersection Contnb.ufion AM(P. - N. 19th Ave. and Durston Rd. 1.6% (1.7%) N. 19th Ave. and Oak St. 3.6% (3.1%) N. 19th Ave. and Tschache Ln. 1.1% (0.9%) N. 19th Ave. and Baxter Ln. 0.9% (0.7%) Baxter Ln. and Fowler/Davis NA Baxter Ln. and N. 27th Ave. NA W. Oak St. and N. 27th Ave. 35.5% (31.8%) TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM BUILDOUT Buildout of the West Winds Community is anticipated for completion in 2014, depending on future market trends and development demand. Road improvements adjacent to the project will include Oak Street from North 27 h Avenue to Davis Lane, North 271' Avenue from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane, and Davis Lane from Oak Street to Baxter Lane. Tschache Lane is expected to extend to North 27 h Avenue by the buildout of the West Winds Community. As demonstrated by the unsignalized intersection LOS analysis, no significant impacts to the study area are anticipated by the buildout of the project, except for an anticipated LOS C at the intersection of Oak Street and North 27 h Avenue. As this LOS is deemed acceptable for a two- way stop-controlled (TWSC) intersection, signalization is not considered necessary at this time. • March 2004 !6#i b At.EG. Page 33 of 40 Traffic Impact 50t y- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana However, consideration for future signalization of the intersection should be made, including appropriate setbacks and sight visibility zones. The analysis of the signalized intersections generally does not indicated significant impacts to the study area, although the analysis does indicate a poor LOS at the intersections of North 19'' Avenue with Durston Road and North 19t' Avenue with Oak Street. A review of the worse case traffic impacts to the North 19t' Avenue / Durston Road intersection and the North 19''Avenue / Oak Street intersection by the buildout trips indicate impacts of 5.1% and 7.1%, respectively, to the total intersection volume. Review of the worse case impacts to the intersection capacity of North 191h Avenue / Durston Road and North 191h Avenue / Oak Street are 5.5% and 14.0%, respectively.4 A summary of traffic impacts to each of the study intersections by the buildout, including Phase 1, of the West Winds Community is provided in Table 7. Table 8. Buildout Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume • Intersection J `Contribution,AM (PM) N. 19th Ave. and Durston Rd. 4.5% (5.1%) N. 19th Ave. and Oak St. 7.1% (6.6%) N. 19th Ave. and Tschache Ln. 2.2% (2.0%) N. 19th Ave. and Baxter Ln. 2.1% (1.7%) Baxter Ln. and Fowler/Davis 10.1% (7.9%) Baxter Ln. and N. 27th Ave. 19.0% (14.5%) W. Oak St. and N. 27th Ave. 55.1% (52.1%) 4 As a percent change from Background capacity to Background Plus Buildout capacity. March 2004 fiN f.N F W, 8 Page 34 of 40 6 kwi • Traffic Impact Ay- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana WARRANT ANALYSIS Warrant analyses for the adjacent unsignalized intersections were not performed as each unsignalized intersection can operate with acceptable delays and with sufficient capacity. V. REVIEW OF COLLSION DATA The collision data was requested and supplied for the 3-year time period between July 2000 through June 2003 by the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) for the following study intersections: • North 19th Avenue & Durston Road • North 19th Avenue & Oak Street • North 19th Avenue &Tschache Lane • North 19th Avenue & Baxter Lane • Davis/Fowler& Baxter Lane Accident rates per million entering vehicles (MEV) were computed for each of the intersections • based on millions of entering vehicles and are listed below. Table 9. Collision Rates `Flntecsection` 1'"�``"�i� K� - } 'Co lesion R""ate pe'r MEyV North 19th Avenue & Durston Road 0.60 North 19`h Avenue & Oak Street 1.24 North 19th Avenue &Tschache Lane 0.28 North 19th Avenue & Baxter Lane 0.65 Davis/Fowler& Baxter Lane 0.41 The data indicates that there are no critical collision locations near the project development. It was noted that the intersection of North 19th Avenue & Oak Street exhibits a higher collision rate than the adjacent intersections due to the predominance of "rear-end" and "side-swipe" type accidents. March 2004 *P9."J.fi N4 Page 35 of 40 • Tragic Impact S*- West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana The development of the West Winds Community is not expected to increase collision rates at the study intersections. VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The analysis presented herein indicates that the site-generated traffic can be adequately accommodated by the existing and proposed roadway system for both the Phase 1 development and for the project buildout. While the majority of the study intersections exhibit satisfactory levels of service of A, B, or C, the intersections of North 191h Avenue at Durston Road and North 191h Avenue at Oak Street exhibit levels of service of F and E, respectively. This degradation in LOS can be attributed to background traffic volumes and would occur regardless of development by this project. Recommendations based on this study are as follows: • No mitigation to the existing roadway system beyond planned improvements to Oak Street, Davis Lane, Baxter Lane, and North 27`h Avenue is necessary due to the additional traffic generated by the proposed development. • Improvements to adjacent streets should be constructed to City of Bozeman approved street standards. • Site drive accesses should be developed according to local standards, should incorporate appropriate throat depths, and provide for the safe passage of pedestrians across the drive access. • Exclusive right-turn lanes at site drive accesses are not considered necessary or warranted as right-turn demands are predicted to be below 100 vehicles per day. • Left turn demand on the east leg of the North 19'h Avenue and Oak Street intersection is projected to exceed 300 vehicles per day, regardless of project development. This volume is generally cited as a guideline towards the development of a dual left-turn lane, and should be considered by the City of Bozeman as a future regional improvement. March 2004 Page 36 of 40 Traffic Impact - West Winds Community Bozeman, Montana • Analysis of the capacity issues along Durston Road and at the intersection of North 19" Avenue at Durston Road indicates that signal improvements would not improve the expected LOS of F. Although iprovements to Durston Road are currently planned and will include the addition of a two-way left turn (TWLT) lane; these improvements will do little to improve the LOS along the corridor, or at its intersection with North 191h Avenue. Regardless, as additional east-west and north-south arterials and collectors are developed adjacent to Durston Road, demand along Durston Road can be expected to stabilize. • Developer funding participation for a future signalized intersection at Oak Street and North 27th Avenue should be considered at a rate equal to the percentage of"conflicting critical movement" site traffic to the total expected capacity of the travel lane. Means of potential funding for a signal at Oak Street and North 27th Avenue include traffic impact funds, private funding, or a SID. Should a signal be warranted at a later date, a SID appears to be the preferred means of funding. An SID would allow proper proportioning of impact and benefit to the users. The West Winds Developer is agreeable to a "Waiver of Protest to SID"for the potential signal improvements at this intersection. • The development of the West Winds Community is not expected to increase collision rates at the study intersections. March 2004 e iv`o 1 aJ E.E-i CN Page 37 of 40 s • APPENDIX SECTION ONE • • Background Traffic Counts - West Winds Community Study Area • 1. N. 19th Avenue& Durston Road From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int Peak 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Durston Road Durston Road Count Hour Interval Right Through Left P22 Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left 7:00.7:15 4 18 6 43 32 4 63 7 10 97 27 319 1853 7:15-7:30 6 13 11 49 37 7 86 17 18 136 33 427 2145 7:30.7:45 6 26 10 73 38 6 70 12 31 167 19 480 2295 7:45.8:00 16 31 18 81 35 19 117 23 36 177 49 627 2335 8:00-8:15 14 26 14 1 90 44 15 114 16 34 154 73 611 2228 8:15.8:30 16 44 26 14 81 42 9 107 28 33 133 44 577 8:30.8:45 13 38 1 17 20 38 40 8 85 23 43 171 24 520 8:45-9:00 7 29 16 25 49 42 10 127 14 29 147 25 520 4:00.4:15 44 52 26 15 37 62 10 169 32 31 170 21 669 2668 4:15-4:30 22 53 26 9 47 60 15 183 29 52 164 28 688 2649 4:30-4:45 36 51 16 10 39 51 12 173 27 53 142 24 634 2587 4:45-5:00 27 41 23 14 67 53 17 156 36 54 155 34 677 2597 5:00-5:15 16 68 15 11 68 48 12 147 26 58 151 30 650 2514 5:16.5:30 36 68 21 1 14 1 46 49 13 146 34 43 129 27 626 5:30.5:45 21 70 16 14 39 39 13 179 1 23 65 140 25 644 5:45-6:00 32 54 20 12 61 54 13 124 1 24 29 136 35 594 AM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 93.1% PM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 96.9% 2. N. 19th Avenue&Oak Street From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int Peak 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Oak Street Oak Street Count Hour • Interval Right Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left Right Throu h Left 7:00-7:15 35 59 0 0 111 9 1 10 10 4 4 17 260 1 1491 7:15-7:30 42 66 1 6 155 13 0 18 16 3 19 21 360 1682 7:30.7:45 38 :67 0 15 164 23 6 22 14 5 10 39 403 1763 7:45.8:00 52 0 1 177 26 4 50 15 4 6 37 468 1827 8:00-8:15 46 5 17 168 22 6 27 16 5 14 35 451 1782 8:15-8:30 59 2 11 132 12 8 30 25 16 7 44 441 8:30-8:45 48 4 16 167 21 3 20 22 16 15 46 4678-45.9.00 38 3 2 5 137 20 4 25 17 14 6 52 423 4:00-4:15 61 217 2 20 142 35 1 21 28 35 43 1 55 660 2614 4:15.4:30 59 195 0 20 178 35 1 15 30 27 30 72 662 2621 4:30-4:45 45 175 2 21 142 47 1 22 28 31 22 63 599 2547 4:45-5:00 44 172 3 23 176 43 2 39 31 39 42 79 693 2587 5:00.5:15 24 171 6 25 158 40 4 27 31 36 45 100 667 2415 5:15.5:30 41 130 3 30 1 129 1 34 1 0 1 33 28 23 54 83 588 5:30-5:45 55 159 3 23 157 34 1 24 23 36 46 1 78 639 5:45-6:00 35 118 1 22 131 31 5 26 17 23 49 63 521 AM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 97.6% PM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 94.6% • TrafficCountTabs.xls • • Background Traffic Counts - West Winds Community Study Area • 3. N. 19th Avenue&Tschache Lane From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int Peak 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Tschache Lane Tschache Lane Count Hour Right Through Left Ri ht Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left 7:00-7:15 0 73 1 0 136 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 212 1248 7:15-7:30 0 101 1 0 185 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 290 1431 7:30-7:45 1 98 2 0 253 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 362 1501 7:45-8:00 0 120 9 1 248 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 384 1492 8:00-8:15 2 116 13 0 1 250 1 0 13 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 395 1431 8:15-8:30 0 1 130 12 0 200 1 1 14 0 1 2 0 0 360 8:30-8:45 0 116 10 0 213 1 6 1 5 1 0 0 353 8:45-9:00 0 137 7 2 163 2 5 0 5 1 0 1 323 4:00-4:15 0 284 6 0 216 8 15 2 5 11 3 4 554 2121 4:15-4:30 2 251 4 0 253 8 20 3 6 10 0 6 563 2013 4:30-4:45 3 219 5 0 228 13 12 1 5 8 0 4 498 1889 4:45-5:00 0 221 7 1 228 5 15 0 10 14 3 2 506 1853 5:00-5:15 2 193 6 0 192 8 17• 0 7 14 3 4 446 1773 5:15-5:30 0 1 162 3 3 214 6 12 1 5 21 3 9 439 5:30.5:45 0 194 5 1 213 0 10 1 12 18 1 7 462 5:45-6:00 0 183 8 1 203 4 12 0 2 13 0 0 426 AM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 95.0% PM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 94.2% 4. N. 19th Avenue& Baxter Lane From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int Peak 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Hour Right Through Left R6ht Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left • 7:00-7:15 2 64 4 132 9 8 1 1 3 3 0 238 1317 7:15-7:30 10 70 13 167 5 5 0 0 1 4 0 285 1500 7:30-7:45 5 91 8214 11 8 3 1 5 5 3 358 1600 7:45-8:00 12 101 7 246 13 13 7 6 13 3 4 436 1627 8:00-8:15 7 109 8239 16 8 4 3 7 5 19 421 1533 8:15-8:30 6 121. 21 8 184 5 8 8 2 8 8 6 385 8:30-8:45 7 101 16 11 188 4 14 2 12 14 3 13 385 8:45-9:00 0 113 1 20 6 148 10 14 8 3 9 3 8 342 4:00.4:15 3 276 17 9 195 5 14 6 16 19 10 13 583 2502 4:15-4:30 15 259 20 10 247 8 20 9 11 19 8 13 639 ;. 2593 4:30-4:45 16 291 14 4 266 4 17 10 18 11 19 11 681 2516 4:45-5:00 11 238 17 7 222 6 27 9 13 22 13 14 599 ' 2422 5:00-5:15 19 263 14 4 263 5 19 3 17 22 17 28 674 2358 5:15-5:30 15 267 11 3 194 2 17 1 7 15 17 13 562 5:30-5:45 7 248 3 1 245 3 13 1 1 7 22 18 19 587 5:45-6:00 17 207 19 2 231 10 3 2 4 24 10 6 535 AM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 93.3% PM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 95.2% TrafficCountTabs.xls Background Traffic Counts - West Winds Community Study Area • 5. N.27th Avenue and Baxter Lane From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int Peak N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Hour Right Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left 7:00-7:15 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 6 0 11 86 7:15.7:30 0 0 6 0 1 0 1 22 0 30 99 7:30-7:45 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 9 0 17 95' 7:45-8:00 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 14 0 28 - 102 8:00-8:15 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 12 0 24 98 8:15-8:30 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 14 0 26 8:30-8:45 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 12 0 24 8:45-9:00 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 10 0 1 24 4:00.4:15 1 0 0 0 14 1 0 10 1 0 1 26 164 4:15-4:30 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 23 0 37 183 4:30-4:45 1 0 1 0 24 1 6 18 0 51 193 4:45-5:00 1 0 1 0 29 0 0 19 0 50 182 5:00-5:15 0 0 0 0 16 0 3 26 0 45 167 5:15-5:30 1 0 0 0 19 1 1 25 0 47 5:30-5:45 0 1 0 1 0 9 1 1 3 26 0 i 40 5:45-6:00 2 0 0 0 6 0 3 24 0 35 AM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 91.1% PM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 94.6% 6. Davis Lane and Baxter Lane From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int Peak Davis Lane Davis Lane Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Hour • Right Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left Right Through Left 7:00-7:15 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 12 101 7:15-7:30 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 0 24 112. 7:30-7:45 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 11 0 23 0 :116 7:45-8:00 6 0 1 0 20 0 0 15 0 42 116 8:00-8:15 4 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 1 12 0 23 97 8:15-8:30 0 0 4 0 8 0 1 15 0 28 8:30-8:45 1 0 1 0 9 0 1 1 11 0 23 8:45.9:00 2 0 1 0 10 1 0 9 0 23 4:00-4:15 1 0 0 0 9 2 2 9 0 23 : -181 4:15-4:30 1 0 1 0 20 2 2 19 0 �45 212 4:30-4:45 3 0 3 0 28 6 4 22 0 66 "202 4:45-5:00 5 0 0 0 18 7 4 13 0 '47`:' 166 - 5:00-5:15 0 0 3 0 17 3 14 17 0 '54 142 5:15-5:30 0 0 3 0 11 2 6 13 0 .35 5:30.6:45 3 0 0 0 5 0 4 18 0 30 5:45-6:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 13 0 23 AM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 69.0% PM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)= 76.5% • TrafficCountTabs.xls Background Traffic Counts - West Winds Community Study Area • 7. N.27th Avenue and Oak Street From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) klnPeak N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Oak Street Oak Street Hour Ri ht Throu h Left Ri ht Throu h Left Ri ht Throu h Left Ri ht Throu h Left 7:00-7:15 10 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 3 131 7:15.7:30 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 2 1537:30-7:45 14 0 0 0 14 0 0 7 10 Ki-6-921 7:45-8:00 21 0 0 0 21 0 0 3 3 MF87 164 8:00-8:15 8 0 0 0 11 0 0 15 7 41 Kl48 8:15-8:30 11 0 0 1 15 0 0 7 1 rw 8:30-8:45 9 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 5 �7 8:45-9:00 9 0 0 0 11 0 0 8 4 t32U 4:00-4:15 11 0 0 :f2 14 0 0 20 16 61 /231 4:15-4:30 8 0 0 9 0 0 17 14 48 240 4:30-4:45 9 0 3 10 0 0 22 13 t57 ILA 4:45.5:00 7 0 0 16 0 0 22 18 t67 K2655:00-5:15 9 0 0 17 0 0 25 19 W70'2 t2775:15-5:30 9 0 0 12 0 0 25 30 W75:30-5:45 6 0 2 12 0 0 17 17 1�547 5:45-6:00 12 0 1 0 11 0 0 20 27 AM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF) PM Intersection Peak Hour Factor(PHF)_' 89.1%. TrafficCountTabs.xls 0 • • System Peak Hour PEAK HOUR OF INTERSECTION THE SYSTEM HOUR TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7:00 1853 1491 1248 1317 86 101 131 6227 7:15 2145 1682: 1431 1500 99 112 153 7122 AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 2295 1763 1501 1600 95 116 169 7539 7:45 2335 1827 1492 1627 102 116 164 7663 8:00 2228 1782 1431 1533 98 97 148 7317 TOTAL 10856 8545 7103 7577 480 542 765 35868 4:00 2668 2614 2121 2502 164 181 231 10481 4:15 2649 2621 2013 2593 183 212 240 10511 PM PEAK HOUR 4:30 2587 2547 1889 2516 193 202 268 10202 4:45 2597 2587 1853 2422 182 166 265 10072 5:00 2514 2415 1773 2358 167 142 271 9640 TOTAL 1 13015 j 12784 9649 12391 889 903 1275 50906 Intersection Key 1 19th&Durston 2 19th&Oak 3 19th&Tschache 4 19th&Baxter 5 Baxter&N 27th 6 Baxter&Davis 7 Oak&N 27th • • � A Phase I Traffic-Peak Hour of the System N. 19th Avenue&Durston Road • From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Durston Road Durston Road Count Interval Left Through Right Left T hrough Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 18 31 16 35 25 23 117 19 49 177 36 627 8:00-8:15 14 26 14 44 17 16 114 15 73 154 34 611 8:15-8:30 26 44 16 42 14 28 107 9 44 133 33 577 8:30-8:45 17 38 13 40 20 23 85 8 24 171 43 520 Peak Hour Vol 75 139 59 161 76 90 423 51 190 635 146 2335 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 84 156 66 181 326 86 101 476 57 214 715 164 2626 Phase I Site 1 5 0 10 19 0 0 2 2 0 1 3 43 Peak Hour+Site 85 161 66 191 345 86 101 478 59 214 716 167 2669 4:15-4:30 26 53 22 60 47 9 29 183 15 28 164 52 688 4:30-4:45 16 51 36 51 39 10 27 173 12 24 142 53 634 4:45-5:00 23 41 27 53 67 14 36 156 17 34 155 54 677' 5:00-5:15 15 68 16 48 68 11 26 147 12 30 151 58 650 Peak Hour Vol 80 213 101 212 221 44 118 659 56 116 612 217 2649 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 90 240 114 239 1 249 1 50 133 742 63 131 689 244 2984 Phase I Site 2 19 0 5 1 11 0 0 1 1 0 2 10 51 Peak Hour+Site 92 259 114 244 260 50 .133 743 64 131 691 254 3035 N. 19th Avenue&Oak Street • From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Oak Street Oak Street Count Interval Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through I Right 7:45-8:00 0 96 52 26 177 1 15 50 4 37 6 4 468 8:00-8:15 5 90 46 22 168 17 16 27 6 35 14 5 451 8:15-8:30 2 95 59 12 132 11 25 30 8 44 7 16 441 8:30-8:45 4 89 48 21 167 16 22 20 3 46 15 16 467 Peak Hour Vol 11 370 205 81 644 45 78 127 21 162 42 41 1827 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 12 416 231 91 725 51 88 143 24 182 47 46 2056 Phase 1 Site 8 0 0 0 0 4 14 18 28 0 5 0 ;77 Peak Hour+Site 20 416 231 91 725 55 102 161 52 182 52 46 2133 4:15-4:30 0 195 59 35 178 20 30 15 1 72 30 27 662 4:30-4:45 2 175 45 47 142 21 28 22 1 63 22 31 599 4:45-5:00 3 172 44 43 176 23 31 39 2 79 42 39 693 5:00-5:15 6 171 24 40 158 25 31 27 4 100 45 36 667 Peak Hour Vol 11 713 172 165 654 89 120 103 8 314 139 133 2621 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 12 802 194 186 736 100 135 1 116 9 353 156 150 2949 Phase I Site 29 0 0 0 0 14 8 10 16 0 18 0 95 Peak Hour+Site 41 802 194 186 736 114 143 126 25 353 174 150 3044 • TrafficCountTabs.xls(2007 Phase I Peak Counts) Phase I Traffic- Peak Hour of the System N. 19th Avenue&Tschache Lane • From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Tschache Lane Tschache Lane Count Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 9 120 0 1 248 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 384 8:00-8:15 13 116 2 0 250 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 395 8:15-8:30 12 130 0 1 1 200 0 1 0 14 1 0 0 2 360 8:30-8:45 10 116 0 1 213 0 5 1 6 0 0 1 353 Peak Hour Vol 44 482 2 3 911 1 7 1 35 0 0 6 1492 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 50 542 2 3 1025 1 8 1 39 0 0 7 1678 Phase I Site 0 13 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Peak Hour+Site 50 555 3 3 1029 1 8 1 1 39 0 0 7 1696 4:15-4:30 4 251 2 8 253 0 6 3 20 6 0 10 563 4:30-4:45 5 219 3 13 228 0 5 1 12 4 0 8 498 4:45-5:00 7 221 0 5 228 1 10 0 15 2 3 14 506 5:00-5:15 6 193 2 8 192 0 7 0 17 4 3 14 446 Peak Hour Vol 22 884 7 34 901 1 28 4 64 16 6 46 2013 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 25 995 8 38 1014 1 1 32 5 72 18 7 52 2267 Phase I Site 0 7 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 21 Peak Hour+Site 25 1002 8 38 1027 1 32 5 72 19 7 52 2288 N. 19th Avenue&Baxter Lane • From South(Northbound) From North(Souhbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left P119 R" ht 7:45-8:00 7 101 12 13 246 11 6 7 13 4 13 436 8:00-8:15 8 109 7 16 239 6 3 4 8 9 7 421 8:15-8:30 21121 6 5 184 8 2 8 8 6 8 385 8:30-8:45 16 101 7 4 188 11 12 2 14 13 14 385 Peak Hour Vol 52 432 32 38 857 36 23 21 43 32 42 1627 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 59 486 36 43 965 41 26 24 48 36 21 47 1832 'Phase 1 Site.+.; 0 - 12 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0. o: yap .;:0' r>'16 Peak Hour+Site 59 498 37 43 968 41 26 24 48 36 21 47 1848 4:15-4:30 20 259 15 8 247 10 11 9 20 13 8 19 639 4:30-4:45 14 291 16 4 266 4 18 10 17 11 19 11 681 4:45-5:00 17 238 11 6 222 7 13 9 27 14 13 22 599 5:00-5:15 14 263 19 5 263 4 17 3 19 28 17 22 674 Peak Hour Vol 65 1051 61 23 998 25 59 31 83 66 57 74 2593 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 73 1183 69 26 1123 28 66 35 93 74 64 83 2917 Phase I Site 0 7 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 20 Peak Hour+Site 73 1190 69 26 1135 28 66 35 1 93 75 64 83 2937 • TrafficCountTabs.xls(2007 Phase I Peak Counts) • 0 Phase I Traffic -Peak Hour of the System • Baxter Lane&N.27th Avenue From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 2 0 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 28 8:00-8:15 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 12 0 24 8:15-8:30 2 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 14 0 26 8:30-8:45 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 12 0 24 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 43 0 0 52 0 102 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 48 0 0 59 0 115 Phase 1 Site 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour+Site 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 48 0 0 59 0 115 4:15-4:30 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 23 0 i 37 4:30-4:45 1 0 1 1 24 0 0 18 6 51 4:45-5:00 1 0 1 0 29 0 0 19 0 50 5:00-5:15 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 26 3 45 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 83 0 0 86 9 183 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 93 0 0 97 10 205 Phase I Site 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour+Site 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 93 0 0 97 10 205 Baxter Lane&Fowler/Davis • From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int Davis lane Davis Lane Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left R53 Right 7:45-8:00 1 0 6 0 20 0 0 0 42 8:00-8:15 0 0 4 1 6 0 0 0 23 8:15-8:30 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 28 8:30-8:45 1 0 1 0 9 0 0 1 23 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 6 0 11 1 43 0 0 2 116 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 7 0 12 1 48 0 0 60 2 130 Phase 1 Site 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 p Peak Hour+Site 0 0 0 1 7 0 12 1 48 0 0 60 2 130 4:15-4:30 1 0 1 2 20 0 0 19 2 45 4:30-4:45 3 0 3 6 28 0 0 22 4 66 4:45-5:00 0 0 5 7 18 0 0 13 4 47 5:00-5:15 3 0 0 3 17 0 0 17 14 54 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 7 0 9 18 83 0 0 71 24 212 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 8 0 10 20 93 0 0 80 27 238 Phase 1 Site 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour+Site 0 0 0 8 0 10 20 93 0 0 80 27 238 TrafficCountTabs.xls(2007 Phase I Peak Counts) Phase I Traffic-Peak Hour of the System Oak Street&N.27th Avenue • From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) int N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Oak Street Oak Street Count Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Ri ht Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 0 0 21 0 21 0 3 3 0 48 8:00-8:15 0 0 8 0 11 0 7 15 0 41 8:15-8:30 0 0 11 0 15 1 1 7 0 r 35 8:30-8:45 0 0 9 0 13 0 5 13 0 40 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 60 1 16 38 0 164 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 68 1 18 43 0 185 Phase 1 Site 2 4 0 _ 38 13 0-- 0 21 8 0 6 10 102 Peak Hour+Site 2 4 55 38 13 0 0 89 9 18 49 10 287 4:15-4:30 0 0 8 1 0 9 0 14 17 0 48 4:30-4:45 3 0 9 0 10 0 13 22 0 57 4:45-5:00 0 0 7 0 16 2 18 22 0 65 5:00-5:15 0 0 9 0 17 0 19 25 0 70 Peak Hour Vol 3 0 33 0 0 0 0 52 2 64 86 0 240 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 3 0 37 0 0 0 0 59 2 72 97 0 270 Phase i Site 8 13 0 21 7 0 0 12 4 0 22 39 126 Peak Hour+Site 11 13 37 21 7 0 0 71 6 72 119 39 396 N 27th Street&Site Driveway at Tschache Lane • From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) int N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Tschache Lane Tschache Lane Count Left I Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 0 8:00-8:15 0 8:15.8:30 0 8:30-8:45 0 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Back round 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase I Site 5 0 :0 0 0 -- 0 1, 0 0 18 0_ 0 0 23 Peak Hour+Site 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 0 23 4:15-4:30 0 4:30-4:45 0 4:45-5:00 0 5:00-5:15 0 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase I Site 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 29 Peak Hour+Site 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 10 1 0 1 0 0 29 TrafficCountTabs.xls(2007 Phase I Peak Counts) Phase I Traffic -Peak Hour of the System N 27th Street&Site Driveway at Breeze Lane • From South(Northbound) From North(Souhbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Road G NA Count Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 0 8:00-8:15 0 8:15-8:30 0 8:30-8:45 0 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase I Site 9 5 0 0 18 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 65 Peak Hour+Site 9 5 0 0 18 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 65 4:15-4:30 p 4:30-4:45 0 4:45.5:00 0 5:00-5:15 0 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Back round 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase I Site 34 19 0 0 10 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 81 Peak Hour+Site 34 19 0 0 10 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 81 Oak Street&Site Driveway at Buckrack Avenue • From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int NA Buckback Avenue Oak Street Oak Street Count Left Through Right Left Ruh Ri ht Left Throu h Ri ht Left Throu h Ri ht7:45-8:00 p 8:00-8:15p 8:15-8:30 p 8:30-8:45 p Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 38 0 99 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 43 0 112 Phase I Site 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0, 8 37 Peak Hour+Site 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 69 0 0 43 8 149 4:15-4:30 0 4:30-4:45 0 4:45-5:00 0 5:00-5:15 p Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 89 0 143 Growth Rate 4 r 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1.1255 1 1.1255 1.1255 1 1.1255 1 1.1255 NA 2007 Background 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 -0 0 100 0 161 -- - -- - - - -- Phase I Site 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 46 Peak Hour+Site 0 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 61 0 0 100 30 207 • TrafficCountTabs.xls(2007 Phase I Peak Counts) Buildour'fraffic (Incl. Phase 1) - Peak Hour of thRystem Major and Minor Intersections 19th Avenue&Durston Road From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Durston Road Durston Road Count Interval Left Through, Right Left P29uO RRh Left Throu h Ri ht Left Throu h Ri ht 7:45.8:00 18 31 16 35 23 117 19 49 177 36 627 8:00•8:15 14 26 14 44 16 114 15 73 154 34 611 8:15.8:30 26 44 16 42 28 107 9 44 133 33 577 8:30-8:45 17 38 13 40 23 85 8 24 171 43 520 Peak Hour Vol 75 139 59 161 90 423 51 190 635 146 2335 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA AddlTraffic 2014 29 53 23 62 111 35 163 20 73 244 56 8982014 Back round 104 192 82 223 401 125 586 71 263 879 202 `'r3233 Phase I 2 4 0 8 13 0 4 7 0 1 2 42 2014 Background+Phasel 106 196 82 231 #45414 106 125 590 78 263 880 204 3275 Buildout 4 15 0 2339 2 1 6 10 0 2 9 111 2014 Background+Buildout 110 211 82 2543 108 126 596 88 263 882 213 3386 4:15-4:30 26 53 22 60 47 9 29 183 15 28 164 52 688 4:30-4:45 16 51 36 51 39 10 27 173 12 24 142 53 634 4:45-5:00 23 41 27 53 67 14 36 156 17 34 155 54 677 5:00.5:15 15 68 16 48 68 11 26 147 12 30 151 58 650 Peak Hour Vol 80 213 101 212 221 44 118 659 56 116 612 217 2649 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA Addl Traffic 2014 31 82 39 81 85 17 45 253 22 45 235 83 1018 2014 Background 111 295 140 293 306 61 163 912 78 161 847 300 3667' Phase l 7 14 0- 5 8 0 1 2 4 0 4 8 53 2014 Background+Phase 118 309 140 298 314 61 164 914 82 161 851 308 3720 Buildout 11 1 44 0 1 16 27 _ 1 2 4 1 7 0 7 26 145 2014 Background+Buildout 129 1 353 140 1 314, 341 62 1 166 918 1 89 161 858 334 3865 19th Avenue&Oak Street From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Oak Street Oak Street Count Interval Left I Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45.8:00 0 96 52 26 177 1 15 50 4 37 6 4 468 8:00-8:15 5 90 46 22 168 17 16 27 6 35 14 5 i, 451 8:15-8:30 2 95 59 12 132 11 25 30 8 44 7 16 441 8:30.8:45 4 89 48 21 167 16 22 20 3 46 15 16 467.:: Peak Hour Vol 11 370 205 81 644 45 78 127 21 162 42 41 1827 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 tNA'J`: Addl Traffic 2014 4 142 79 31 247 17 30 49 8 62 16 16 2014 Background 15 512 284 112 891 62 108 176 29 224 58 57 :252$. 'Phase 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 3 16 22 0 4 0 z!`52 2014 Background+Phase 21 512 284 112 891 63 111 192 51 224 62 57 2580 Buildout 18 6 0 4 16 1 2 35 48 0 13 1 144 2014 Background+Buildout 1 39 1 518 284 116 907 64 113 227 99 224 75 58 2T24 4:15.4:30 0 195 59 35 178 20 30 15 1 72 30 27 662 4:30-4:45 2 175 45 47 142 21 28 22 1 63 22 31 599 4:45.5:00 3 172 44 43 176 23 31 39 2 79 42 39 693 5:00-5:15 6 171 24 40 158 25 31 27 4 100 45 36 667 Peak Hour Vol 11 713 172 165 654 89 120 103 8 314 139 133 2621 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 ! NA Addl Traffic 2014 4 274 66 63 251 34 46 40 3 121 53 51 1006 2014 Background 15 987 238 228 905 123 166 143 11 435 192 184 3627 Phasel 23 0 0 0 0 3 2 9 13 0 16 0 66 2014 Background+Phase 38 987 238 228 905 126 168 152 24 435 208 184 3693 Buildout 55 18 0 3 11 2 1 24 33 0 39 4 190 2014 Background+Buildout 93 1005 238 231 916 128 169 176 57 435 247 188 3883 • TratficCountTabs.xls(2014 Buildout Peak Counts) Buildouoraffic (Incl. Phase I) - Peak Hour of tSystem Major and Minor Intersections . 19th Avenue&Tschache Lane From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Tschache Lane Tschache Lane Count Interval Left I Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 9 120 0 1 248 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 384 8:00-815 13 116 2 0 250 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 395 8:15-8:30 12 130 0 1 200 0 1 0 14 0 0 2 360 8:30-8:45 10 116 0 1 213 0 5 1 6 0 0 1 353 Peak Hour Vol 44 482 2 3 911 1 7 1 35 0 0 6 1492 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA Addl Traffic 2014 17 185 1 1 350 0 3 0 13 0 0 2 572 2014 Background 61 667 3 1 4 1261 1 10 1 48 0 0 8 2064 Phase[ 0 3 0 J 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 9 2014 Background+Phase 1 61 670 3 4 1 1262 2 13 2 48 0 0 8 2073 Buildout 7 2 0 0 1 1 4 2 19 0 1 0 37 2014 Background+Buildout 68 672 3 4 1 1263 3 17 4 67 0 1 8 2110 4:15-4:30 4 251 2 8 253 0 6 3 20 6 0 10 563 4:30-4:45 5 219 3 13 228 0 5 1 12 4 0 8 498 4:45-5:00 7 221 0 5 228 1 10 0 15 2 3 14 506 5:00-5:15 6 193 2 8 192 0 7 0 17 4 3 14 446 Peak Hour Vol 22 884 7 34 901 1 28 4 64 16 6 46 2013 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA AddiTraffic 2014 8 340 3 13 346 0 11 2 25 6 2 18 774 2014 Background 30 1224 10 47 1247 1 39 6 89 22 8 64 2787 Phasel 0 2 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 10 2014 Background+Phase 30 1226 10 47 1250 4 40 6 89 22 9 64 2797 Buildout 22 1 0 0 2 4 3 1 13 0 2 0 48 2014 Background+Buildout 52 1227 10 47 1252 8 43 7 102 22 11 64 2845 . 19th Avenue&Baxter Lane From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min 19th Avenue North 19th Avenue North Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Interval Left I Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-,8:00 7 101 12 13 246 11 6 7 13 4 3 13 436 8:00-8:15 8 109 7 16 239 6 3 4 8 9 5 7 421 8:15.8:30 21 121 6 5 184 8 2 8 8 6 8 8 385 8:30-8:45 16 101 7 4 188 11 12 2 14 13 3 14 385 _ Peak Hour Vol 52 432 32 38 857 36 23 21 43 32 19 42 1627 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA Addl Traffic 2014 20 166 12 15 329 14 9 8 17 12 7 16 625 2014 Background 72 598 44 53 1186 50 32 29 60 44 26 58 2252' ;n: Phase 0 5 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 1 13 2014 Background+Phase 72 603 44 53 1187 51 35 31 60 44 27 58 2265 n="sr i ' Buildout 0 6 0 0 2 5 14 6 0 •0 2 0 35 2014 Background+Buildout 1 72 609 44 53 1189 56 49 37 60 44 29 58 2300 4:15-4:30 20 259 15 8 247 10 11 9 20 13 8 19 639 4:30-4:45 14 291 16 4 266 4 18 10 17 11 19 11 681 4:45-5:00 17 238 11 6 222 7 13 9 27 14 13 22 599 5:00-5:15 14 263 19 5 263 4 17 3 19 28 17 22 674 Peak Hour Vol 65 1051 61 23 998 25 59 31 83 66 57 74 2593 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA AddiTraffic 2014 25 404 23 9 383 10 1 23 12 32 25 22 28 996 2014 Background 90 1455 84 32 1381 35 82 43 115 91 79 102 3589 Phase 1 0 3 0 0 5 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 15 2014 Background+Phase 90 1458 84 32 1386 38 83 44 115 91 81 102 3604 Buildout 1 0 4 0 0 7 15 9 4 0 0 7 0 46 2014 Background+Buildout 1 90 1 1462 84 1 32 1393 53 92 1 48 115 91 88 1 102 3650 • TrafficCountTabs.xls(2014 Buildout Peak Counts) f3uildou'praffic (Incl. Phase I - Peak Hour of thAY stem Major and Minor Intersections axter Lane&N.27th Avenue From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count Interval Left I Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 2 0 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 28 8:00.8:15 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 12 0 24 8:15-8:30 1 2 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 14 0 1 26 8:30-8:45 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 12 0 j 24 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 43 0 1 0 52 0 102 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA Addi Traffic 2014 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 17 0 0 20 0 1 39 2014 Background 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 60 0 0 72 0 141 t" Phase 0 0 5 0 f 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 2014 Background+Phase 0 0 5 8 0 1 0 1 60 0 1 72 0 147 Buildout 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 14 0 2 5 0 27 2014 Background+Buildout 0 0 11 8 0 1 0 74 0 3 77 0 174 4:15-4:30 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 23 0 37 4:30-4:45 1 0 1 1 24 0 0 18 6 51 4:45-5:00 1 0 1 0 29 0 0 19 0 50 5:00-5:15 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 26 3 45_ Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 83 .0 0 86 9 183 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842• 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1, NA Addl Traffic 2014 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 32 0 0 33 3 70 2014 Background 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 115 0 0 119 12 253 is . Phasel 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 2014 Background+Phase 0 0 3 3 0 3 1 115 0 5 119 12 261 <r'`, ;: Buildout 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 9 0 7 15 0 35 2014 Background+Buildout 0 0 7 3 0 3 1 124 0 12 134 12 296 axter Lane& Fowler/Davis From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min Davis Lane Davis Lane Baxter Lane Baxter Lane Count. Interval 7 Left Throu h Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 1 0 6 0 20 0 0 15 0 42 8:00-8:15 0 0 4 1 6 0 0 12 0 23 8:15.8:30 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 15 1 28 8:30-8:45 1 0 1 0 9 0 0 11 1 23 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 6 0 11 1 43 0 0 53 2 116 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA Addl Traffic 2014 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 •17 0 0 20 1 44' 2014 Background 0 0 0 8 0 15 1 60 0 0 73 3 160 Phase l 1 = 2 0 0 D 0 0 0 -0- -0 0 2 5 2014 Background+Phase 1 1 2 0 8 0 15 1 60 0 0 73 5 165 I!!' Buildout 0 2 " 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 6 13 2014 Background+Buildout 1 4 0 10 1 15 1 61 0 0 1 74 11 178 4:15-4:30 1 0 1 2 20 0 0 19 2 45 4:30-4:45 3 0 3 6 28 0 0 22 4 66 4:45-5:00 0 0 5 7 18 0 0 13 4 47 5:00.5:15 3 0 0 3 17 0 0 17 14 54 Peak HourVol 0 0 0 7 0 9 18 83 0 0 71 24 212 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA Addl Traffic 2014 0 0 0 3 0 3 7 32 0 0 27 9 81 2014 Background 0 0 0 10 0 12 25 115 0 0 98 33 293 Phase 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 2014 Background+Phase 1 0 1 0 12 2. 12 25 115 1 0 98 34 300 Buildout 0 1 0 _ _1 7 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 4 1 18 2014 Background+Buildout 0 1 2 0 1 19 1 4 1 12 25 117 2 0 99 1 38 1 318 TrafficCountTabs.xls(2014 Buildout Peak Counts) L Buildoutraffic (Incl. Phase 1) - Peak Hour of taystem Major and Minor Intersections Oak Street&N.27th Avenue From South(Northbound) From North(Southbound) From West(Eastbound) From East(Westbound) Int 15-min N.27th Avenue N.27th Avenue Oak Street Oak Street Count Interval Left I Through Right Left Through I Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:45-8:00 0 0 21 0 21 0 3 3 0 48 8:00-815 0 0 8 0 11 0 7 15 0 41 8:15-8:30 0 0 11 0 15 1 1 7 0 35 8:30-8:45 0 0 9 0 13 0 5 13 0 40 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 1 60 1 16 38 0 164 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 NA Addl Traffic 2014 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 23 0 6 15 0 63 2014 Background 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 83 1 22 53 0 227 Phase 3 4 0 23 16 0 0 18 10 0 5 6 85 2014 Background+Phase 3 4 68 23 16 0 0 101 11 22 58 6 312 Buildout 11 10 0 29 26 J 0 0 1 57 29 0 21 11 194 2014 Background+Buildout 1 14 1 14 1 68 52 42 1 0 0 1 158 40 1 22 79 17 506 4:15-4:30 0 0 8 0 9 0 1 14 17 0 48 4:30-4:45 3 0 9 0 10 0 13 22 0 57 4:46-5:00 0 0 7 0 16 2 18 22 0 65 5:00-5:15 0 0 9 0 17 0 19 25 0 70 Peak Hour Vol 3 0 33 0 0 0 0 52 2 64 86 0 240 Growth Rate 11 rs 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1.3842 1 1.3842 NA Addl Traffic 2014 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 20 1 25 33 0 93 2014 Background 4 0 46 0 0 0 0 72 3 89 119 0 333 Phase 11 17 0 13 9 0 0 10 6 0 19 23 108 2014 Back round+Phase 1 15 17 46 13 9 0 0 82 9 89 138 23 441 Buildout 32 29 0 20 18 0 0 391 20 0 64 32 254 2014 Background+Buildout 47 46 46 33 27 0 0 121 1 29 89 202 55 695 • • TrafficCountTabs.xis(2014 Buildout Peak Counts) APPENDIX SECTION TWO HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 8 �_N'i EST, ,EBR �,WBL T WBR. N L N ----S VlbV'6 m 00t E B L BT Lane Configurations deal_-Flow(vphpi)) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 �75�neufil.�Factor --- 1.00 -f-.CFO--- 1.00 -F9�_5 - 1.00 0.9 Frt 0.93 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 ti It Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1717 1720 1770 3502 1770 3518 It Permitted 0.88 0.86 0.21 1.00 0.44 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1538 1508 399 3502 822 3518 olume vph) 26 48 36 21 47 59 486 36965 -41 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pdj. Flow(vph) 28 26 52 39 23 51 M 2" 39 _46- 1�M__�__447 Lane Group Flow(vph) - 0 106 0 0 113 - 0- 63 562 0- 1- _461082 0 �urn_Type Perm Perm pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.5 6.5 41.8 38.3 39.4 37.1 Effective Green,g(5) 8.5 8.5 43.8 41.3 41.4 40.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.69 0.65 0.66 0.64 Plearance Time(s)_ 6.0 6.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ea n�_eG Grp Cap(vph)p�hh_ -207______ _263 _ _33-1 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.16 0.00 c0.31 LV/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.07 0.12 - -0.65 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.56 0.19 0.25 0.08 0.48 Pniform Delay,d1 25.4 25.5 3.6 4.5 3.8 6.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay, d2 2.1 3.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 Delay(s) 27.5 28.8 3.9 4.5 3.9 6.2 �evel of Service C C A A A A Approach Delay(s) 27.5 28.8 4.5 6.1 N-proach LOS C C A 16teiCM Average Control Delay 8.1 HCM Level of Service- --A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 �ctuated Cycle Length (s) 63.1 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.7% ICU Level of Service A Critical Lane Group • 2007 Background-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 .0 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: W Oak St & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 p(Wo#j4h'Wo, #.. $L,,�A_gF$,T#.N,4' R.,.UWBEI�*,WBT*WBR4 NBV-,,,7NBT4 Lane Configurations deal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900_ 1900 j Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 coo 6.95- 1.00 0.95 j Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 F-It Protected 0.95 0.95 1.00 -0.95 - -1.00 - 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satcl. Flow(prot) 1770 1823 1770 1863 1583 1770 3349 1770 3504 Fit Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.30 .J�.00 � Satd. Flow(perm) 1352 1823 757 1863 1583 656 3349 560 3504 olume(vph) 88 143 24 182 47 46 12 16 231 91 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 dj. F ow vph 90 146 24 186 48 47 1-2 -424 -236 93 7:4�O �52, Lane Group Flow(vph) 90 170 0- 186 48 47 12 660 0 93 792 0 rurn jy -__7--7 __ - __ __- - - - __ __ - t - __-0v -- Perm - -- -- - -1 Type Perm pqj+p� Over erm P_M+pt Protected Phases 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 ermitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.7 11.7 22.7 22.7 4.8 32.7 32.7 41.5 41.5 Effective Green,g (s) 13.7 13.7 24.7 24.7 4.8 35.7 35.7 44.5 44.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.46 0.46 0.58 0.58 [Clearance Time (§,) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0� 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - -a n�e(�r -N-032-4-7 98_W3 -1549 Grp 334 596 398 2020 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.05 0.03 0.03 c0.20 0.01 c0.23 s Ratio n 0.07 c0.13 0.02 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.52 0.56 0.08 0.48 0.04 0.43 0.23 0.39 Pniform Delay,d 1 28.0 28.8 20.3 18.3 35.0 11.4 13.9 8.0 8.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Yncremental Delay, �.0 1.5 2.0 0.1 3.7 0.2 0.9 0.3 0.6 Delay(s) 29.0 30.3 22.3 18.4 38.7 11.6 14.8 8.3 9.5 Level of Service C C C B D B B A Approach Delay(s) 29.9 24.4 14.7 9.4 Npeoach LOS C C B A ICM Average Control Delay _15.6 T HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 ctuated Cycle Length(s) 77.2 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.8% ICU Level of Service D Critica Lane Group • 2007 Background -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 . 0 0 * HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 WEBT�.W- w-74 jEBRRVYBlZ,'-:_-� BT.,-4WBR- Lane Configurations deal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 100 1900 19001900 1900 1900- 1900 1900 1906�1900' Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 j:a_n­eUtil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 TOO 0695 Frt 0.89 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,f It Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1646 1611 1770 3537 1770 3539 It Permitted1.00 0:25 1-00 0.43 1:00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1555 1611 470 3537 808 3539 Pbldm-e(7p-h)' 7 8-1---89-0- 0 7 50 542­�2 �3 1025. 1 Peak-hour factor, PH F 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Vdj._Flow(vph) 9 1 41 0 0 7 -53-577 23-10901 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0- 51 0 0 7 0 53 579 * 0 3 1091 0 Turn 1 Perm Perm Perm p�L� Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 PerniNd Phases 4 8 2 -6 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.4 4.4 71.3 71.3 71.3 71.3 Effective Green, 6.4 6.4 74.3 74.3 74.3 743--1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 ,Ueara6ce Time(s) 6.0 6.0 -TO-7.0 7.0--7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ne Grp Cap v-fiF- v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.16 c0.31 • k0s Ratio Perm C0.03 0.11 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.00 0.37 Wit&r-m Delay,81 39.5 38.3 1.3 -1.4 1.2 107 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 2.9 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.14 Delay(s) 42.4 38.6 2.0 1.5 1.2 2.0 Level of Service . 0 tj A A A A Approach Delay(s) 42.4 38.6 1.6 2.0 [§proach LOS 0 0 A A Jiite-rWr,fi7njS'u1�mary�18'11='11105111111111 : H(�M-Ave-ri�g-e-Control-Delay-3.2 HCM Level ofService_ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37 jkctuated Cycle Length(s) 88.7 Sum of lost time 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service A Critical Lane Group 2007 Background -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Dorston & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 • _ . i :7�r...- J. - yam,.t .. - r Vbvement 7.7.777 7 EEG,,_ EBT.'*EBR_'�WBL:., WB ;,.WBR NBL .t.,N13T.4 S_BR Lane Configurations jdeal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1906- 1900 1900 106"- �1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0- 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1833 1770 1811 1770 3382 1770 3429 It Permitted 0.06 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.47 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 119 1833 395 1811 715 3382 869 3429 LVq-lume(vph) -10-1--416-57-2-14-715-164-84-156-66-1-8-1-32_ Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow(vp h) 1-09 512 -61-230 76-9-1 76 90 168 71 1-95 351-92 Lane Group Flow(vph) 109 573 0 230 945 0 90 239 0 195 443 0 Yurn Type pm+pt - m+pt pm+pt m+p Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted:Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G(s) 71.5 61.1 78.0 64.6 40.2 30.0 48.4 34.2 Effective Gree 1.0 62.6 86*0 66.1 41.7 31.5 49.9 35.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.45 0.58 0.48 0.30 0.23 0.36 0.26 Plearance Time LO 5.5 -4.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5_5___j. Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ane Grp Cap V_fi)_1 87 829 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.31 c0.06 c0.52 0.02 0.07 c0.05 c0.13 • ,V/s_Ratio_Perm 0.26 0.30 0.07 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.69 0.63 1.09 0.31 0.31 0.48 0.50 jiniform Delay,al 69.1 30.2 26.2 36.2 35.8 _44.4 32.1 43.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental E L6 2.5 3.4 59.0 0.6 0.2 0.9 0.4 Delay(s) 67.6 32.7 23.6 95.1 36.4 44.7 33.0 44.2 1�6_vef of Service E C C F D D C D____j Approach Delay(s) 38.3 81.1 42.4 40.8 ;kpproach COS D -F 0 RC_M_Avei6bi_6&n Control D-ela- 7. HCM�Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cyr 138.4 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.3% ICU Level of Service F Critical Lane • 2007 Background -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Fowler Ave 3/4/2004 Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Fr'ee----Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% jVoICrn_e_(veh/h). . . 1 48 60 2 7 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) - 1 52 65 2 8 13 Pedestrians Fa—ne Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) �ercent�Blqqkage Right turn flare (veh) None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting,volume 67 121 66 vC1,stage 1 conf vol ,VC�2,—stage 2 c-o—nf vol tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p queue free% 100 99 99 771 cM capacity(veh/h) 1534 874 997 EBA--'W!31 '.'SB 1 -'77. 17"F7 Volume Total 53 67 21 jVo—lume Left 1 0 8 Volume Right 0 2 13 tSH . 1534 1700 948 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.04 0.02 I.Dueue Length(ft) 0 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.2 0.0 8.9 Fane_WS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.2 0.0 8.9 �Oproach LOS A �veragR y D�la �-_ 1.4�— Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.6% ICU Level of Service A F_ • 2007 Background -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N 27th Ave 3/4/2004 ovement �:; :.:N, BT R L. BR.;;.. Lane Configurations , ign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume veh/h 0 48 59 0 7 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 0 52 64 0 8 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) edian type None Median storage veh) E C,conflicting volume 64 116 64 vC1,stage 1 conf vol C2,stage 2 conf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 C,2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 queue free% 100 _ 99 100_ cM capacity(veh/h) 1538 880 1000 Volume Total 52 64 9 • Volume Left 0 0 8 Volume Right 0 0 1 SH 1538 1700 893 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.04 0.01 ueue Length (ft 0 0 1 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 ane LOS I A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 approach LOS A 16t6r-s 6n-TSOmma Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.4% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Background -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: W Oak St & N 27th Ave 3/4/2004 e. MovemenC.: Lane Configurations 6ign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% W6-1—ume­(vehrfi) 62 1 18 43 0 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 dourly flow rate(veh/h) 67 1 20 47 0 -60 Pedestrians �ane Width 7(ft)- Walking Speed (ft/s) FiFF—cent4lockage Right turn flare(veh) edian type None Median storage veh) jVC,conflicting volume 68 154 68 vC1,stage 1 conf vol VIP,stage 2nonf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 queue free% 99 100 94 cM capacity(veh/h) 1533 827 995 Volume Total 68 66 60 • l olume Left 0 20 0 Volume Right 1 0 60 P—H— 1700 1533 995 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.01 6.06 Pueue Length (ft) 0 1 5 Control Delay(s) 0.0 2.2 8.8 Fane—LOS A - A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 2.2 8.8 jApproach LOS A Average A�ef;iy 3.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.0% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Background-AM Peak Synchro,5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 0 i HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 MoV6ffidht-i'vt�_ E B IT,F.E BT-W,,,-.E B RO W_.W_B U.S T W.RT4VVBR_W.NBL%NRT4N fSOL NBRA JW$B.AWS Lane Configurations '4.0 )deal Flow(vphpl) 196-0-1900 1900 15-0-0 - 1900 1966�1900 1900--1966-1906-7 966-1900, Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Fane-Otil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 - 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected -0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1713 1739 1770 3510 1770 3527 It-Permitted 0.76 0.79 0.15 1.00 0.14 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1328 1397 278 3510 256 3527 Volume_(vph) --- --- ­_ 66- - _36 93 74---t_4 83 731183 ' 69 - -26 1-1-2-3- Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 59 37 98-78 67 87 -77-1245 73 27 71-8 2-2 9, Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 204 0 0 232 0 77 1318 0 27 1211 0 jr6ffirypLi-_-Perm __-PerrW pm+pt pm+_pt I Protected Phases . 4 8 5 2 1 6 Pamn-Ftf-ed Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 9.6 29.6 27.0 27.8 26.1 Eftective Green, 11.6 11.6 31.6 30a0 29.8 29.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.58 0.55 0.55 0.54 [Clearance Time 6.0 6.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 284 298 rp p(Why 206 1939 160 1890 L6-ne;G Ca Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.38 0.00 0.34 F/s Ratio PermPerm 0.15 --60.17 0.21 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.78 0.37 0.68 0.17 0.64 Phif6irimi-Delay,d! 19.8 20.1 6.2 8.7 6.7 -8.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 8.4 12.1 1.1 1.0 .0.5 0.8 Delay(s) 28.2 32.2 7.4 9.7 7.2 9.7 Level of Service C -C A A A A- Approach Delay(s) 28.2 32.2 9.5 9.6 [�pproach LOS C C A • `A I' MEM MOORE FUM-AveLag e ervice j_Cbn-tr6l_'b lay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Kc-tuated Cycle Length(s) 54.3 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.4% ICU Level of Service C E-Critical Lane-Group • 2007 Background -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 0 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: W Oak St & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 EBL7:�EBr;,!.,'.;...,,EBR .:,WBL,*�',W!17,.-,WBR-,:,:,,NBL ,�'�`NBT.7 NBR BIL SBT",- B FoVemen Lane Configurations I Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -1-90-0 1900 1906 1900 1900 190 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 one U-b I-Fa c t o r 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00 09_5_____j Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1842 1770 1863 1583 1770 3436 1770 3476 Flit Permitted 0.65 1.00 - -0:60 1.60 -17.60--- 03-2- 1.00 0.13 ' Satd. Flow(perm) 1215 1842 923 1863 1583 596 3436 236 3476 (Volume(vph) 135 _116 -9 -353 1156 150 U _802 19_4 -1-8-6- Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 �4dj. Flow 1) _ 144 123 1-0- -376 -1_66 160 13 853 206 198 Lane Group Flow(vph) 144 133 0 376 166 160 13 1059 ' 0 198 889 0 Lyqrm:-typ 6----------Perm------ P-M+pt---Over-Perm-----Pm+pt--I Protected Phases 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.9 , 12.9 23.9 23.9 6.0 30.1 30.1 40.1 40.1 Pff6crive Green,g(s) 14.9 14.9 25.9 25.9 6.0 33.1 33.1 43.1 43.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.43 0.43 0.56 0.56 Plearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 bane Grp Cap(vph) 235 356 387 627 1 27 1 123 23 256 1477 ­252 1946 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 C0.09 0.09 C0.10 0.31 0.06 0.26 /s Ratio Perm 0.12 c0.24 0.02 c0.38 • v/c Ratio 0.61 0.37 0.97 0.26 1.30 0.05 0.72 0.79 0.46 Pnif6rm Delay,d1 28.4 27.0 24.7 18.6 3-5-.5 - 12.8 18.1 12.6 10.0 � Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental )eiay,_d2 4.7 0.7 38.1 0.2 18-2.3 -0.4 3.0 14.8 0.8 Delay(s) 33.1 27.7 62.8 18.8 217.8 13.2 21.1 27.4 10.8 evel of Service C C E B F B C C U__� Approach Delay(s) 30.5 87.7 21.0 13.8 �pproach LOS C F C B j0ter§eqtid HCM Average Control Delay 34.3 Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 ctuated ,le Length (sk) 77.0 Sur 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.2% ICU Level of Service E !✓ Critical Lane Group • 2007 Background-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 w �-, J,��A L:= '-EBRt,,Wl1L.,'..r-WBT WBRz.,,NBL:�.,���,NBT:; NBR,,,.�.,! SBI S 97R Lane Configurations 41 [deal 5-low(vphpl) !goo 1966 1900 1900 1666 1900 - 1900-` 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 19ro, Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Van Ecffiffl.-Factor _1 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 It Protected 6.09 0.99 0.9-5 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1673 1674 1770 3535 1770 3539 It Permitted 0.90 0.91 0.22 1.011 0.23 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1531 1547 415 3535 422 3539 Volume(vph) -32 5 72 - 18- 7 52 -25 995 8 - 38 _1014 11 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 36 6 81 20 8 58 - 2-9 -1118 9 43 1139 - 11 Lane Group Flow(vph) - 6- 123 0 0 86 0 28 1127 0 43 114 0-0 ru m Type --_-Perm --- Permi Perm ---Perm --- Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 emtitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.2 8.2 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 MENi�-Green,g (s) 10.2 10.2 49.4 48.4 48.4 48.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 rlearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 �ane Grp Cap(vph�)_ 23-4- 237 302 2569 307 2572 v/s Ratio Prot 0.32 c0.32 V/s Ratio Perm c0.08 0.06 0.07 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.36 0.09 0.44 0.14 0.44 PniforM,Delay,dl _26.0 25.3 2.7 3.7 2.8 -3.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.1 0.9 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.6 Delay(s) 28.1 26.2 3.3 4.2 3.7 4.2 Vevel 6T Service C C A A A Approach Delay(s) 28.1 26.2 4.2 4.2 �pproach L09 C C A A MOMMUS FW_i 4vm.O_ContioI De_Iay___ -6.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 66.6 Sum of lost time 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.4% ICU Level of Service A Critics Lane Group • 2007 Background -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Durston & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 F c, ti EBT,,�k;EWTMBL'"v�emeri P.MM 44EB",- Lane Configurations --j deal Flow(vphpl) 00 1900 1900 19001900 1900 1-900,1906-1900 1900 1900 1 9OQ Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 - 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Fa-ne Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1600 1:00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 It Protected0.95 TOO -0.95 TOO -0-.95-1 M 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1841 1770 1790 1770 3368 1770 3450 rIt Permitted- 0.05 1o00 0.11 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.38 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 102 1841 207 1790 875 3368 703 3450 fn� 142 63 _131 669 244 90­^NO _' 1-147=�239- 449­_5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Vdj. Flow(vph) 1-39 773 66 136 719-254-9-4-25-0-1-1-9-24-9-25-0-• 52 Lane Group Flow(vph) 139 839 0 136 972 0 94 369 0 249 311 0 jT_u pe pm+ t -- _ - --- Pm+Pt pm Y_ P +p4 _ Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 - 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 78._6 71.6 80.4 72.5 35.0 30.0 37.0 31.0 P fective Greer,g-(s)-80.1- 73.1 81.9, 7490 36.5-3175 38.5 32.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.54 0.61 0.55 0.27 0.23 0.29 0.24 rlearance Time(s) _ 4.0 5.5 4.0- 5.5 -4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 La_66'Grp Ca ph)7 _ 148 1001 2-187 9_85 271_­180 249 --8-34-- v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.46 0.04 c0.54 0.01 0.11 c0.04 0.09 F/7-gatio Perm 0.51 0.34 0.08 c0.24 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.84 0.62 0.99 0.35 0.47 1.00 0.37 U, nifo-rm Delay,dl 39-.1 15*7 23.1 29.8-:18-.2-44-.3- -4871-42-6777 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2_55_.2_ 692 5.5 25.2 0.8 0.4 57.0 0.3 Delay(s) 94.3 32.0 28.6 55.0 39.0 44.7 105.2 42.8 revel of ServiceF C C 0 - D 1 1) Approach Delay(s) 40.8 51.7 43.6 70.5 9pproach 108 0 D D j7nWCsRfi6-njSumma KC­M-Av_eraj of Service _-­b- jC6n_tro,Ibj1jy 56:6 o- I HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 P,.6tuated Cycle 134.5 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.0% ICU Level of Service G L Crifical Lane Group 2007 Background-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Fowler Ave 3/4/2004 ovement=, EBL: : i B t; BR : SBL SBR7777 ,..„ Lane Configurations '[ sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% olume(veh/h) 20 93 80 27 8 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ouriy flow rate(veh/h) 22 101 87 29 9 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft. Walking Speed (ft/s) ercent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) j7C,conflicting volume 116 246 102 vC1,stage 1 conf vol ,uC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 C,2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 0 queue free% 99 99 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1472 731 954 jf6bb6n-,*Lanel " 'EB'1 s WB 1:,:'SB 1 Volume Total 123 116 20 • olume Left 22 0 9 Volume Right 0 ' 29 11 SH 1472 1700 840 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.07 0.02 ueue Length(ft) 1 0 2 Control Delay(s) 1.4 0.0 9.4 Fa e LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 1.4 0.0 9.4 pproach LOS A Kyerage Delay -- Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.3% ICU Level of Service A is2007 Background-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N 27th Ave 3/4/2004 ovemenf EBL. E BT WBR ,'SBL� x- Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% olume(yeh/h) 1 93 97 10 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 1 101 105 11 2 2 Pedestrians ane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) ercent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) C, conflicting volume 116 214 111 vC1,stage 1 conf vol �rC2, stage 2 conf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 C,2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 0 queue free% 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1472 .774 942 irection,'Lane# .w. EB"1 WB�1 SB 1 Volume Total 102 116 4 olume Left 1 0 2 Volume Right 0 11 2 SH 1472 1700 850 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.07 0.01 ueue Length {ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.3 ane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.3 pproach LOS A Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.2% ICU Level of Service A 2007 Background -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 9 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: W Oak St & N 27th Ave 3/4/2004 ovement w WBT` 'NBL� '_NBR t771 Lane Configurations . ign Control _ Free _ Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% I olume(veh/h) 59 2 72 97 3 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vehlh 64 2 78 105 3 40 Pedestrians ane Width(ft Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) edian �e None Median storage veh) V C,conflicting volume 66 327 65 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 71,stage 2 conf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 C,2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 0 queue free% _ 95 99 96 _ cM capacity(veh/h) 1535 633 999 erection;;.,-ane# _ ' .1"•WB 1!4N6 V _. ..,. .. Volume Total 66 184 43 • I olume Left 0 78 3 Volume Right 2 0 40 SH 1700 1535 957 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.05 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 0 4 4 Control Delay(s) 0.0 3.4 8.9 ane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 3.4 8.9 pproach LOS A nters ion: umma }� z` : . ,.v _ _ _er gea Delay 3 5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.5% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Background-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 9 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 NBT-,KNRR!�l�,;SBU�,v..'SBT-�7SB7 EBLI.-T,;EBT-,''-EBR,. f WBL�7-W8T;w_,.WBR`-.--_TN8L Lane Configurations - _1900 -1, 1-.6u6�1�966,ideal Flow hpl) 1900 1900 1900 ' 1900 1966 _�190*0 goo 1900 1906-190C 1900" Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 -4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 J�arn­e­Ufil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0995 1.00 0.95----1 Frt 0.93 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 FIt Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1717 1725 1770 3505 1770 3518 Fit-Permitted 0.89- 0.86 0.21 -1900 0.44 1.00 Satd. Flow 1549 1504 397 3505 814 3518 2_4_48_36_21_43_59498_34_43069_4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Kdj_._Flow(v ph) - 28-26 52 39 23 46 63 535_37-46 107477--4-47, Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 106 0 0 108 0 63 572 0 46 1085 0 VdFh Type � ---- ­--Perm - ---- - �Pe­nrn--- -1 A�-7- - =p­m--+-Pf -- --P-M-+P-F= ---­___ I Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted'Phases 4 8 - 2 -6 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.4 6.4 41.8 38.3 39.4 37.1 �%Fc_tive Green, 8.4 8.4 43.8 41.3 41.4 40.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.64 Plearance Time(s) 7 6.0 6.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ane Grp Cap v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.16 0.00 c0.31 • W/_i_Ratio Perm -0*67 _c 0 705 7_071 2 0005 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.54 0.19 0.25 0.08 0.48 JJniform Delay,di 25-.4- 25.5 16-4.5- 3.8 6.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fncremental Delay,d2 - 2.1 2.8 03 6.1 0.1 0.2 Delay(s) 27.5 28.2 3.9 4.5 3.9 6.2 Level of Service C C A A A A Approach Delay(s) 27.5 28.2 4.5 6.1 Kpproach LOS C C 'NYA A W _1�0 AA P FCM 6�v­erag� 7.9 �_HCW_Leve[`&f_9eW66 r __'k 7_ I HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 �,ctuated Cyc N 63.0 Sum of lost time -12.0; Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service A b, Critical Lane Group • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: W Oak St & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 0 . 1 ,. etf A o IL si,!. -yemen o VVBR-_-,,�*T'NBL' ' NB T NBR. S=_ Lane Configurations Ideal pl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 F-1-90-55 j Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Utill. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 F-It-Pro-tect-ed 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 ::�.00 � Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1795 1770 1863 1583 1770 3349 1770 3502 FIt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.30 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1346 1795 633 1863 1583 653 3349 ' 552 3502 LVolume_(%tph) 102 161 52 182 52 46 20 416 231 91 725 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.F16w(vph 104 1-94 53 -1-8-6 53 47 20 424 236 W -_740 -56; Lane Group Flow(vph) 104 21-7 -0 - 186 --5-3- 47 - 20 66-0- _93296- 0 1 �urn Type--_ - Perm pm+pt Over Perm pm+pt - Protected Phases 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 13.0 24.0 24.0 4.7 32.2 32.2 40.9 40.9 Fffective Green, g(s) 15.0 15.0 26.0 26.0 4.7 35.2 35.2 43.9 43.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.45 0.45 0.56 0.56 Plearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 :77.70:= Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Fa-neGrp Cap_(yp4) 2-59 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.05 0.03 0.03 c0.20 0.01 c0.23 • /s Ratio Perm 0.08 cO.14 0.03 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.63 0.59 0.09 0.49 0.07 0.44 0.24 0.40 Pniform Delay--,dl _277.5 28.9 19.9 17.8 35.4 12.1 14.6 8.6 9.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 1.0 3.5 3.0 0.1 3.9 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.6 Delay(s) 28.5 32.4 22.9 17.9 39.3 12.5 15.5 8.9 10.2 �evel R Service -0 C C B D S-19 A Approach Delay(s) 31.2 24.7 15.4 10.1 [Approach LOS C C B B ICM Average Control Delay 16.8 HCM Level of ServiceB HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 �kctuated Cy( 77.9 Sum of lost time 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.5% ICU Level of Service D Critical Lane Group • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 FAdvprWQV BWiNBR7:,MF "B W T- - WBR:--,;4�-NBlJ,§,W B IV-,j�,,a Lane Configurations 4.4 Weal F16w---(vphpl) 1900 1900 190-0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900, 1900 FO-IM Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 �ane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.89 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rIt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1646 1611 1770 3537 1770 3539 It Permitted 0.94 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.43 �00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1555 1611 467 3537 797 3539 olume vph) Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 dj. Flow 1) 9 1 41 0 0 7 53 590 3 3 1095 � Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 51 0 0 7 0 53 593 0 3 1096 0 yurn Type- r �--- --- - Perm --- - Pe-r-m- - --.�------�P e-r m- -------- - -Per r m- --­­ -- I Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 . 1 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.4 4.4 71.3 71.3 71.3 71.3 Pffective Green, 6.4 6.4 74.3 74.3 74.3 74.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Plearance Times) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 �ane Grp Cap­ __i 12 __ 391_ 66 yph)7_ 116 2963 8 2964 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.17 c0.31 • Ps'Ratio Perm c0-.03 0.11 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.00 0.37 I.Iniform Delay,dl 39.5 38.3 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.9 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.4 Delay(s) 42.4 38.6 2.0 1.6 1.2 2.0 �evel of Service D D A A A A Approach Delay(s) 42.4 38.6 1.6 2.0 �pproach'LOS D D A A fffe f s�kd 4 g-dW 11MM11.1 = �11 VCM-kve-ra6e--C6-nYo-l--Delay-. .2 _14C`M­ILeve1_of_Service -. -----A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38 P,ctuated Cycle 88.7 gum of lost times 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.0% ICU Level of Service A -Critical Lane Group • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Durston & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 kk,­ P N O-Vement.'_' ' i;.; EBL.1- EBT -EBR:t.;�4WgL�-"r�WBT;-;WBR�....s Lane Configurations )deal Flow ,hpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190677M Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 FIt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1832 1770 1810 1770 3385 1770 3434 F17tPermitted 0.06 1,00 0.21 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.46 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 119 1832 387 1810 682 3385 860 3434 Volume"yph 101 4713- 59 !.1 716 167 85 -161 66191 _79_58�� Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow(v-ph) 1-09 514 63 230 770 180 91 173 71 205 371 92 Lane Group Flow(vph) 109 577 0 230 950 0 91 244 0 205 463 0' pin Type M+Pt pm+pt pm+_pt pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 71.5 61.1 78.0 64.6 40.4 30.1 48.7 34.4 fNctive Green,g (s) 73.0 62.6 80.0 66.1 41.9 31.6 50.2 35.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.45 0.58 0.48 0.30 0.23 0.36 0.26 Plearance Time(s) 4.0 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ,Lane Grp Cap(]vEh) =­18 6827 362 863 287 771 407--878--91 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.31 c0.06 c0.52 0.02 0.07 c0.05 c0.13 • Vj/s-Rabo Perm 0.26 0.30 0.07 0.15 v1c Ratio 0.59 0.70 0.64 1.10 0.32 0.32 0.50 0.52 finiform Delay,dl 63.2 30.5 20.5 36.5 35.9 44.6 32.2 44.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 4.7 2.6 3.6 62.0 0.6 0.2 1.0 0.6 Delay(s) 67.9 33.1 24.1 98.3 36.5 44.8 33.2 44.6 Level of Service E C C P D D C D Approach Delay(s) 38.6 83.9 42.5 41.1 Floproach L08 D F D 0 FICMAy7eFi e Co--_n_t_ro_1 Delay -5-8__._3 __H_C_MLevel of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 [Actuated Cycle 138.7 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.2% ICU Level of Service F p Critical Lane Group • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Fowler Ave 3/4/2004 ovement E111T a . B SBR. Lane Configurations 11 N ign.Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% t olume (veh/h), 1 48 60 '2 : �7 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Viourly'.flow'rate(veh/h) r"I 52 65 ;2 8 13 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) e•rcentBlockage � :} . ...�=. ; Right turn flare(veh) ediamty.,e None Median storage veh) C;conflicting volume 67 121 66 vC1,stage 1 conf vol �_C2;v stage'2 conf vol tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Q queue free,%, -100 . 99 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1534 874 997 PiFecbon, ane# EB 1 B,1. SB 1 Volume Total 53 67 21 • olume Left 1 , , 7 0, 8 Volume Right 0 2 13 1534 1700 948 } . . .. . < Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.04 0.02 ueue`Length (ft) G 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.2 0.0 8.9 ane LOS A-= rA ,E: . 777 7, . Approach Delay(s) 0.2 0.0 8.9 pproach 108 7 A . d Pr ntersec_ on umma, verage Delay, 1'4 = Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.6% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 M HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N 27th Ave 3/4/2004 Lane Configurations l ---------- ig-�Co Control r o�l Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/-h) 0 48 59 0 7 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (yeh/h) 0 52 64 0 8 1 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Re—di—n type None Medianstorage veh) conflicting volume 64 116 64 vC1,stage 1 conf vol kC2,stage 2 66-rf v—ol-- tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 K,—2_stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 0 queue free% 100 99 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1538 880 1000 Volume Total 52 64 9 �olum6ULeft 0 0 8 Volume Right 0 0 1 �SH 1538 1700 893 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.04 0.01 Vueue_Length 0 0 1 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 Fa—ne L—OS A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 proaqh LOS A � - verage be 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.4% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 • 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Tschache Ln & N. 27th 3/4/2004 ovement'. ::._ 7 •-;:EBL _:EBR:.::,' BL. T--:-SBT :;SBR ,::_ Lane Configurations _ ►� } Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% olume(veh/h) 0 18 5 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ourly flow rate(veh/h) 0 20 5 0 0 0 Pedestrians ane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) C,conflicting volume 11 0 0 vC1,stage 1 conf vol i C2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 C,2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 0 queue free% 100 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1006 1085 1623 irecbcih, iie. ti+µ.. B ., 11 B ; • Volume Total 20 5 0 0 Volume Left 0 5 0 0 Volume Right 20 0 0 0 cSH 1085 1623 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 8.4 7.2 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A A [ikpproach Delay_(s) 8.4 7.2 0.0 Approach LOS A au t "� k i., 3 V w 7 ---- - Average Delay 8.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: W Oak St & N. 27th 3/4/2004 -R -L 'NBW '-S Movement-7.7-77 -7 E-BL'.j',...'EBT-...,�"EffR �.WK';', WBT:.�WB, ISIKI'�O,'�NBT'..'t Lane Configurations ,Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Fo-lume (veh/h) 0 89 9 18 49 10 2 4 55 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ouriy flow rate(vehLh) 0 97 10 20 53 11 2 4 60 41 14 Pedestrians fi-ne Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) ercent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) edian type None None Median storage veh) VLC-,conflicting volume 64 107 174 205 53 208 204 3 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,--stage-2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 fq-,2 stage(s) ---7 tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 0 queue !% 100 99 100 99 94 94 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1536 1482 752 681 1003 677 682 1034 Pitectibri, Lane# Z". EB 3 WB I WB 2-, B 3',tN i,:,,SB!l 7. Volume Total 0 64 42 20 36 29 66 55 Left -6-0 0 20 0 0 2 41 Volume Right 0 0 10 0 0 11 60 0 �SH 1700 1700 17760 482 1700 1700 962 678 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.08 LengthQueue (ft) -- 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 7 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 9.0 10.8 A A B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 1.7 9.0 10.8 jNpproach--L0S A B Kve �g -De-r� Delay .3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.1% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Breeze Lane & N. 27th 3/4/2004 JAI ovemen E B 124 RE B R, N BT SBT BR Lane Configurations ign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 0 1 33 8 4 1,1& . `', 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ouriy flow rate(veh/h) :,,0- - 36 g 4 20 ,0 Pedestrians ane�Width;(ft) 7777 Walking Speed (ft/s) erceih Blockage"_:_, Right turn flare(veh) edian type;, '', s•; None Median storage veh) C;conflicting volume fc41 20 20 vC1, stage 1 conf vol C2,stage'2 confvol tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 O queue.free% = 1,00 97 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 965 1058 1597 •irec6i5n, ane E 131111 IN B 2 P6166e,Tbtal 36 : 20 Volume Left 0 9 0 0 olumeJRi-ht ;36 0' �:0 0 cSH 1058 1597 1700 1700 olume'to,Capacity 0:03 a=.�0:01 '0.00 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 3 0 0 0 ontrol'Dela (s) 8.5 7.3 0.0 Lane LOS A A pproacti,Delay(s) 8 5 Approach LOS A ntersectt n Summary Average Delay 5.4 ntersection`Capacity Utilization 13.3%' ICUILevel of Service • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: W Oak St & Buckrack 3/4/2004 Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/1-) 0 69 43 8 29 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ourly flow rate(v—eh/-h) 0 75 47 9 32 0 Pedestrians Vane Width(fi Walking Speed (ft/s) Fe—rcentBlockage Right turn flare(veh) Median a n type None Median storage veh) 85-28 conflicting volume 55 vC1, stage 1 conf vol FCT,ita5g 2 33--n-f—vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 �0 queue free% 100 9,7-106— cM capacity(veh/h) 1548 902 1041 1y-,`W B 2'r�--SB Volume Total 0 38 38 31 24 32 • Fo—lume Left 0 0 0 0 0 32 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 9 0 �SH 1700 1700 --1700--1700-1700 902 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.03 ;Queue Length N. 0 0 0 0 0 5 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 rpn—eTQ—S A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 Wroacti LOS A Fverage Delay 1.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Phase 1 -AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 BR.X, W NI3Tj1%Nl3R*WS_ T3,W.6 P_�T�W*S B R, Lane Configurations [deal FI�ow(vpEp"fl)_ 1T96_01900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1906 1906- 1-900, Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 11.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 R Protected - -0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1713 1739 1770 3510 1770 3527 It Permitted 0.76 0.79 0.15 1 AO 0.14 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1327 1395 271 3510 256 3527 Volume(vph) - - -66- 35 93- 16 " - _E3 73 1190 -69- _26­11_86 28; Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 �jFlo�w(vph) 69 37 98 79 67 87 77 1253 73 27 1195 29, Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 204 6-0 233 0 77 1326 0 27 1224 0 Turn ype Perm Perm pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G (s) 9.6 9.6 29.6 27.0 27.8 26.1 Pffe-dive Green,g(s) 11.6 11.6 31.6 30.0 29.8 29.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.58 0.55 0.55 0.54 r,,learance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 j;a*Grp_Cap M 288 298 202 1939 160 1890 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.38 0.00 0.35 ,Vls Ratio Perm 0.15 c0.17 0.21 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.78 0.38 0.68 0.17 0.65 ,Unif6rrn Delay,dl 19.8 20.2 6.3 8.7 6.7 9.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Increffiental Delay,d2 8.7 1)r, ­J 1.2 1.0 0.5 0.8 Delay(s) 28.6 32.7 7.5 9.8 7.2 9.7 �evel of Service - C A A A Approach Delay(s) 28.6 32.7 9.6 9.7 Fpproach LOS C C A MMINNOMMIN11-y�-KW �i -ky e Lrk�EContrblbe(a: 12.6 HCM Level of Service B -77- HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 l_kctuated Cycle 54.3 Sum of lost time 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service C Cd_bcal Lane Group 2007 Phase 1 =PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: W Oak St & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 ovemenf :. . .. EB ;EBT BR `; BL ;WBT ;WBR- N C` --NBT � BR. �SSUI rS T .-'.S Lane Configurations ' ►� >� 11 4 deal Flow(vphpl 1900 1900 1900 %0__ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 It Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1817 1770 1863 1583 1770 3436 1770 3468 It Permitted 0.64 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.13 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1196 1817 841 1863 1583 592 3436 240 3468 Polume(vph) 143 126 25 353 174 150­41 802 _194' 186 736 11.4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 dj. Flow(vph) i-51 133 26 372 183 158 43 844 _2.04 196 775 120, Lane Group Flow(vph) 151 159 0 372 183 158 43 1048 0 196 895 0 rum Type _� s Perm ---- pm+pt Over Perm_ - pm_+pt _ Protected Phases 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 ermitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.3 13.3 24.3 24.3 6.0 30.1 30.1 40.1 40.1 ffective Gre(n,g s) 15.3 15.3 26.3 26.3 6.0 33.1 33.1 43.1 43.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.43 0.43 0.56 0.56 ,Clearance Time(s) ;.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 _4.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph} 236 359 370 633 123 253 -1469_ 252 1931 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.09 0.10 c0.10 0.31 0.06 0.26 • /s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.25 0.07 c0.37 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.44 1.01 0.29 1.28, 0.17 0.71 0.78 0.46 niform Delay,d1 28.5 27.3 25.1 18.7 35.7 13.7 18.2 . 12.6 10.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay, d2 • 5.6 0.9 48.1 0.3 116.1 1.5 3.0 1 .0 0.8 Delay(s) 34.1 28.2 73.2 19.0 211.8 15.1 21.2 26.6 11.0 Level of Service C C E B F B C C B Approach Delay(s) 31.1 90.0 21.0 13.8 F.pproach COS C F C B Intersection Summary.,, =: a HCM`Average Control Delay 34.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 77.4 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service E c Critical Lane Group • 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 Nil EBT BT' SB s Lane Configurations jd&_a_l'Flo:w7(vphpl) 1900 1900-1900-1900-1900 1900 .1900 'I'M -1900 1900 1900�-19 0 0 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 �aneUtil. Factor 1:00 1.00 1.00 0,95. _1:00-0:95 Frt 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 It Protected 0.99 0.99 0W95 1.00 OM 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1673 1675 1770 3535 1770 3539 It-Permitted 0.90 0.91 0.22 1.00 0.22 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1530 1543 407 3535 418 3539 W6Ume(vph) 32 -6 72 IT - 7 - 52 25--1002- - 8 3-8- Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 36 6 81 21 8 58 28 1126 9 43 1154 71 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 123 0 0 87 0 28 1135 0 43 1155 0 Type Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Fe-rmitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 8.3 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 Effective Green;g(s) 10.3 1093 48.4 48._4 48.4 48.47� Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 rlearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0- 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 LiiCe Grp Cap(Vph) 236 238 295 2565 303 -2568 v/s Ratio Prot 0.32 c0.33 • k/s Ratio Perm C0.08 0.06 OW 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.37 0.09 0.44 0.14 0.45 [Jnifo-rm Delay,dl 299 25.3 2.7 3.7 2.8 3.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental De ay, 2.1 11.0 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.6 Delay(s) 28.0 26.2 3.3 4.3 3.8 4.3 �evel of Service C C A A A - Approach Delay(s) 28.0 26.2 4.2 4.3 [Approacfi LOS C ff te-(s-e-c1 i oir f,�S u m rrfary CM Average Control Delay 6.-1� ^HCM Level ofService A - 1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 Rtuated Cycle 66.7 Sum of lost time(s)- - '8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.8% ICU Level of Service A p Critical Lane Group 2007 Phase I -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 . 0 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Durston & N 19th Ave 3./4/2004 Povement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR _NBL NBT NSR SBL SBT MR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1906 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 gop Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1840 1770 1788 1770 3388 1770 3454 Fit Permitted 0.06 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.33 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 113 1840 112 1788 963 3388 607 3454 Volume_(vph) __ -- - _______133 743 --64 -131 691 -254 - 92- ­259 ----10-4- - -2-44 mo 50" Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 91--ROW_(YP 67 136 720 265 96 270 108 254 271 -5 2 Lane Group Flow(vph) 139 841 0 136 985 0 96 378 0 254 323 0 K6Lrn_TY_p_ P m+4:07c_ q Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 76.5 64.6 76.4 64.8 40.8 30.1 49.5 34.8 Fffective Green, g(s)_ 78.0 66.1 78.4 66.3 42.3 31.6 51.0 36.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.47 0.56 0.47 0.30 0.22 0.36 0.26 Pearance Time W 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 75---7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 �ane Grp Cap(vph)- 202 861 204 _840 - 350 758 346 888 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.46 0.06 c0.55 0.02 0.11 C0.08 0.09 • Phs Ratio Perin 0.32 0.31 0.06 C0.19 Wc Ratio 0.69 0.98 0.67 1.17 0.27 0.50 0.73 0.36 Pnifo-rrn Delay,dl 64.2 36.8 35.5 37.4 36.6 47.9 34.5 3.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 9.4 24.8 8.0 90.2 -0.4-0.5- 7.8 0.3 Delay(s) 73.6 61.6 43.4 127.7 37.1 48.4 42.4 43.2 �evel of Service E E D D D D D Approach Delay(s) 63.3 117.4 46.1 42.9 ?%pproach LOS E F D 0 IntersecUon Summary FCM_Average Control Delay 76-.2 -HCM fLevel of_­Service__ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 ctuated :le Length(s) 1-41.2 Sum of lost time_(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 114.1% ICU Level of Service G FCritical Lane Group • 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Fowler Ave 3/4/2004 o e DEB 16B B B �e_,R Lane Configurations ; Sign Control Free , Free Stop _ �T Grade 0% 0% 0% I olume"(veh/h); 20: 93 80 ; 7 8 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare(veh) None Median storage veh) C,conflicting volume 1 6 °k -«246' >102 vC1,stage 1 conf vol L�C2 "stage,2tconf_vol tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 I�C,2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 O:queue free'%o. 99 :,, r, " ,, ;;.: 99 .99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1472 731 954 Volume Total 123 116 20 • olume Left.' 22 :. Q Volume Right 0 29 11 •1472 1700 Volume to Capacity i 0.01 0.07- 0.02 'ueuesLehgth(ft): ,' 1 X 0 �2 Control Delay(s) 1.4 0.0 9.4 Approach Delay(s)~ 1.4 0.0 9.4 a ;v rage�Delay ���.��,��:� ,�:����� ':��4�� �-%� .�,� .T .•.a'+. , ,:-� f '� �.-' Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.3% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N 27th Ave 3/4/2004 Ro—vement,77 7 7`77; EB B T. WBR:,f;;,SBL **�SBR!--•.,'�:"�", 7---, Lane Configurations ign Control_ Free Free Stop — - - Grade 0% 0% 0% VP0711 1) 1 93 —97 16 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/fi) 1 101 -105 11 2 2 Pedestrians bane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Perc6ht Blockage Right turn flare(veh) edian type None Median storage veh) PC,conflicting volume 116 214 111 vC1,stage 1 conf vol ,orif vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 �O queue free% 100 100i 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1472 774 942 Pir6db6ri,'.'B66 13,1',`�WB ll� M,V 7: Volume Total 102 116 4 • Wo—lume Left 1 0 2 Volume Right 0 11 2 b8H 1472 1700 850 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.07 0.01 ueue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.3 bane W�S A A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.3 [Approach LOS A W9 6=iyira e7Delay— —0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.2% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: W Oak St & N. 27th 3/4/2004 ;V "N Movementi-..', EBL EBT EBR = WBL WBT WBR'.,, NBL NBT 071 Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop StOD I Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 0 71 6 72 119 39 11 13 37 21 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate 0 77 7 78 129 -42 12 14 40 23 �8 - Pedestrians Fa-ne Width (ft) I Walking Speed (ft/s) Fe-rcent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) None -No-ne----1 Median storage veh) ,VC-,conflicting volume 172 84 305-400--- 42 393 - 391 -8 vC1,stage 1 conf vol RC2,stage 2 c-onf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 IC,2 stage(s)_ ---- tF(s) 2.2 2.2 -3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 queue free% 100 95 98 97 96 95 99, 1 cM capacity(veh/h) 1403 1511 593 503 1020 488 515 956 Pirecton, Lane# EB1.,:-;',EB 2 i' lEB 3 -WB 1 WB 2 'WB 1 NB I SB 1 77 71 Volume Total 0 51 32 78 86 86 66 30 P-olume Left 0 0 0 --78 0 0 12 23 Volume Right 0 0 7 0 0 42 40 0 t8H 1700 1700 1700 1511 1700 1700756-495 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.06 Pueue Lengif0f) 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 5 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 10.2 12.8 a�ne L.(�:�S A . B . B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 2.4 10.2 12.8 [kpproach LOS 153 B ve�i�el Delay -, 3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.7% ICU Level of Service A F-- - 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 • 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Breeze Lane & N. 27th 3/4/2004 :-C F1 :�:ti�.=• .:,,'\•, Ji�,, �.o ./pet o7emen NN0wMwEl3lJWEl3RNNl5IJWN,BT SB, SB. Lane Configurations ►� r ,Sigh Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% oIL_ ume(veh/h) 0 _ 18 34 19 10 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 0 --20 37 21 11 0 Pedestrians Vane Width (ft) r7.F-7 7,77 77, 77 7, v . 7.777 Walking Speed (ft/s) uercent.Blockage Right turn flare(veh) edian type `-K' None Median storage veh) C,conflicting volume ' 105 11 .11 ' vC1, stage 1 conf vol C2;stage'2 cont Vol F tC,single(s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 ',0Ueue,free% 100 98 98 cM capacity(veh/h) 872 1070 1608 Y irect o-n, Lane; EI3J1RNl3-j1 NNI31215SIBillpWHIM • o1umej6t6l 20 7 21 1i�s - k Volume Left 0 37 0 0 olume;Right s �20 :0 0 ;0 r. •��^ cSH 1070 1608 1700 1700 olumesto`,Capacity, '0:02' ";0.02 I0:01 0:01 Queue Length (ft) 1 2 0 0 ontro;Delay`(s) Lane LOS A A pproach`,Delay(s)" 84 "4:7 0.0 rt Approach LOS A ntersec_ion umma. Average Delay 4.9 ntersection'Capacity Utilization 7 13.3% ICU Level of Service 7 Aga ;, 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: W Oak St & Buckrack 3/4/2004 =o_vement EBL EBT -BT BR SBL SBROWN Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free _ Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h 0 ,61 ; ,- 100 ,, 30 76 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ouriy flow rate(vet/h) -0 66 -109 33 17 0 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Perdbrit]BlockU-7-17 _ Right turn flare(veh) edian type • `�<, None . Median storage veh) C,conflicting volume. 141 158 .71 vC1, stage 1 conf vol C2; tage 2 conf Vol tC,single(s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 queue,free% "100 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1439 817 977 ir_ection, ee.;,# EB 1 EB 2 B WB 1 WB 2 SB„1., Volume Total 0 33 33 72 69 17 • olume eft ; o, , 0 '0 0 0 17 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 33 0 H's ?1700 f>-1700.-_ 1700; .1700 TT-TO0. -`817 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02 ueiie'Length (ft) . `• '0 0 0 ,0 0 '} '2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 �arie.LOS - s�?� �� `a'� `� A �. j .�<k. • _ Ee Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.5 TT titer_section umma, Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.0% ICU Level of Service A • 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 • • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 14: Tschache Ln & N. 27th 3/4/2004 ll ov_ement EBL BR NBL b B; SBT SB Lane Configurations Sign Conntrol Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% olume(veh/h) 7 0 . 10 19 0 .", 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ourly flow rate(veh/h) 0 11 �21 07771 Pedestrians 'ane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) ercent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) edian type__ _` None Median storage veh) C;'conflicting volume. 41 •,0 0 vC1, stage 1 conf vol CZ,-sM6ge,2 66nfW1 _ -71 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 queiae:free% i y100 . 99 ;99 cM capacity(veh/h) 958 1085 1623 4 t. irection, Lane B 1 NB B SB 1 olumeT toah, : ;� ,�1t1 Volume Left 0 21 0 0 olumeRight '11 0 cSH 1085 1623 1700 1700 Queue Length (ft) 1 1 0 0 ontrol Delay'(s) ' ; 8 4 7 2s,0 0 Y' 0.0: I Lane LOS A A pproach,Delay(s)`r�,� �8 4 �7 2 �,, r:f0 0�,.,', �.: z. x Approach LOS A ntersec ion umma Average Delay 7.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of,Service. A • 2007 Phase 1 -PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 • Ate, * L 10 M6%ffe-nt�g-� ;DEB W0MEBRZLWU., WBWT*,NB0;W 5T NBRW_ SB W T 7 W_B_0 _ W_B- Lane Configurations jdeal Ff6-w-(vp )0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1906 1900 19001900 190-0, Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.94 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 It Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1720 1720 1770 3503 1770 3518 Ft Permitted_- 0.87 0.83 0.13 1.00 0.36 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1524 1456 247 3503 666 3518 jV616me,(vph) 35 _31 ___ 60- _44 ,_27_ 58 72 ___ 603 44 ____53 _1187 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Fd-j. Flow(vph) _ 738 34 65 48 29 63 78 655 48 58 1290 5 Lane Group Flow(vph) - 0 137 0 0 140 0 78 703 0 58 1345 0 ru!��Ty e____Perm _Perm pn1+p pm+pt =1 Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases - 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.5 8.5 35.2 32.2 35.2 32.2 IEff6ctive­Gre( 10.5 10.5 37.7 35_.2 37.7 35.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.63 0.58 0.63 0.58 Plearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 3.5 7.0 3.5 7.0 'Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Line Grp Cap(v-p--h) 266 ---254--' ' ' - -218 - 204-8 463 2057 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.20 0.01 c0.38 W/s RaUo Perm 0.09 C0.10 0.21 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.55 0.36 0.34 0.13 0.65 Prdfbrmbelay,d1 22.5 22.7 - 6.0 6.5 4.4 8.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.7 2.6 1.0 0.1 0.1 Delay(s) 24.2 25.3 7.0 6.6 4.5 9.2 revel of Service C C A A A A Approach Delay(s) 24.2 25.3 6.6 9.0 Approach 109 C C A A �,n,Ar. c JIMM9161111111111111111111111AM. Pig, ­ KCM_Aver_a___to_ntro[­De1�j -10. _"HW,"e �1-6_f Service- B ge HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 �ctuateidCycle Length(s) 60.2 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.5% ICU Level of Service B UfiLgal Lane Group • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Oak Street & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 Lane Configurations .1 4-41 JI, !deal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19-00 1000 1900, Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ;tor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 ____1 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 ,Fft Protected 0.95 Tbo 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1805 1770 1863 1583 1770 3350 1770 3504 It Permitted0.71 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0--.26 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1329 1805 513 1863 1583 478 3350 379 3504 Volume(vpb) - 111 - 192 - 51 224 - 62 57_ 21 612 284 - 112- 891 -6 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 �dj. Flow-(vph) 121 209 56­24-3-- 67 62 23 557 IN 122- _968 68, Lane Group Flow(vph) 121 264 0 243 67 62 23 866 0 122 1036 0 frurri-T Type pm+pt Over Re- --y -Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 4. 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.1 14.1 25.1 25.1 4.7 32.2 32.2 40.9 40.9 Fffecrive Green,9(s) 16.1 16.1 27.1 27.1 4.7 35.2 35.2 43.9 43.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.45 0.45 0.56 0.56 (Clearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 We Grip Cap-(Vph) 271 368 281 639 04--- 213 1493 293 1947 - v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.07 0.04 0.04 c0.26 0.02 c0.30 �/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.22 0.05 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.72 0.85 0.10 0.66 0.11 0.58 0.42--0.53---- Pnifo-rm Delay,di 27.5 29.3 22.1 17.7 36.4 -12.-8- -16.4 10.1 11.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 jncremen1a!_Delay,d2 1.2 _-6.5 20.0 OT 15-6 1.0 1.7 1.0 Delay(s) 28.7 35.9 42.1 17.8 51.9 13.8 18.0 11.1 12.1 eve!of Service _C� D D B D 9 B 8 B Approach Delay(s) 33.6 39.4 17.9 12.0 Approach LOS C D B P fbfrsec 0.4A Uff)rfi,"6 N' CMAverage be11*Y_ __26.5 HCM Levelof Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 ctuated ;le Length(s) 79.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.1% ICU Level of Service E Critical Lane Group Lane Background(w/Phase 1)-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 NBLkWNI3,TftNBR q�EBO E13 ;&-EBR,- BIJW.�YVBT WBRW, FSBL Lane Configurations )deal'Flow-(vphpl) 1-900 1900 1960-1-0-01900 1900 1900 ' 1g00-1g0q-1gej-1M6 190 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 -1-0-0--0-.95 -i 400-0.-95- 1 Frt 0.90 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FIt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1653 1611 1770 3537 1770 3538 �tP Permitted mitted 0e93 1.00 0.18_1.0 6 0.37 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1548 1611 328 3537 692 3538 Volume 13 ' -2 - 48 -0 - ' 0 8­­ 61 - - 670- �3 4 �1262 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 14 2 52 0 6 -0 66 728-, 3 '' 4 1372 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 68 0 0 9 0 66 731 0 4 1374 0 um Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G (s) 6.2 6.2 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 - - - -Effective Green, 65-5 65-8.2 8.2 . - .5 MY 65.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 rlearance Time(s) 6.0 6*0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0____j Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 arie Grp Cap(v- -155 162 555 2836 ph) -263 2836 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.21 c0.39 Ws Ratio Perm c0.04 0.20 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.06 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.48 lJnifo-rm Delay,dl 34.6 33.2 200 2.0 1.6 2.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 2.0 0.1 2:3 0.2 0.0 0.6 Delay(s) 36.6 33.4 4.3 2.2 1.6 3.2 revel of Service D C A A A - A Approach Delay(s) 36.6 33.4 2.4 3.2 [�pproach EOS D C A ptersectton ummary. ICM Avef`a.g 4.1 H C�M Level of SWr vi&eHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 Kc-tuated Cycle 81.7 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.0% ICU Level of Service C Critical LaneLane Group • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Durston & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 -n QWORMBLWNnqNBRWOWWB_WS"rR Lane Configurations N' ideal Flow(vpl�pll) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 bane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 It Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1830 1770 1810 1770 3383 1770 3431 FNrr_n_iqed 0.07 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.40 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) -125 1830 117 1810 471 3383 751 3431 KoIume_(yph) _ 126 _-SO 78 __263_ . 86b 264 - 106--106 82 --231 --414- -10 fi Peak-hour factor, PH F 0.92 0.92 0*92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ddjFlo�w(vph) 136 641 -85 78-9 957 222 116 213 89 251 460 119, Lane Group Flow e- (vph) 136 726 - 0 286 1179 0 -115,_ 302 0 251 565 0 UM LY Type ---Pm+pt vt- i- pt- pm+pt - - pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Fe-rmftted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G(s) 69.9 58.0 82.8 66.9 42.7 30.9 49.9 34.5 Pffective Green,-9(s) 71.4 59.5 84.3 68.4 44.2 32.4 51.4- 36-0--- Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.41 0.59 0.47 0.31 0.22 0.36 0.25 learance`Time (s) 4.0 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.0 9.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cali(vph�) -198 756 _361 859 251 -761 M �57 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.40 c0.13 c0.65 0.04 0.09 c0.07 0.16 Fs-Ratio Perm 0.28 0.41 0.10 c0.17 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.96 0.93 1.37 0.46 0.40 0.67 0.66 Pniforrn�Delay,dl 34.7 41.2 .47.7 37.8 _37._8_41._5 35.2 48.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uncremental Delay,d2 9.5 23.4 33.8 175.0 1.3 0.3 4.4 1.8 Delay(s) 44.2 64.5 81.5 212.9 39.1 47.9 39.6 50.4 `evel of Service D , E F IF D D D Approach Delay(s) 61.3 187.2 45.5 47.1 Rp proach LOS E F D F ROM kv7e rag-e__C oh-t-rol De lay,-ni _�o M Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 [Actuated Cycle Length (s). ," 144.1 Sum of lost time(s). 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 123.6% ICU Level of Service H �C Critical Lane Group 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 0 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Davis Lane - 3/4/2004 WBT2 BRI.�1,�,NBL,---:;NB T- NBR ,SBL:.'--,'e.SRT,."-SB I Lane Configurations Ai 'i,4� P&gn Control Free Free -stop Stop­---� Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% LVLofuriie (veh1h) 1 60 0 0 73 5 1 2 0 8 --'-d-1 5,� Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 1 65 0 0 79 5 1 2 0 9 Pedestrians �ane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) re-rc-entBlockage Right turn flare(veh) M-edian type None None Median storage veh) I volume 85 65 166 152 65 151 149 82 vC1,stage I conf vol stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 LC,2 stage-(s) tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 0 queue e% 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 -98, cM capacity(veh/h) 1512 1537 785 739 999 815 742 978 P66-66n;'Une"# EB'1 WB 1 NB 1' Volume Total 66 85 1 2 25 Fo-lume Left 1 0 1 a 9 Volume Right 0 5 0 0 16 �SH 1512 13-37 785 739 914 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 Pueue Length 0 0 0 0 2 Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 9.6 9.9 9.0 F-me LOS A A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.8 9.0 F- ppiroach LOS A A Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.5% ICU Level of Service A • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N. 27th 3/4/2004 Nk Y 'EBR-•WBIL ,W13T."'MBIR Lane Configurations $ijfi Control Free Free stop stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% WbIm-e(vetT/h) -0-60-0 1 72 0 & 0 5 8 0 --71 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 flourly flow rate(veh/ 0 65 0 --i 78 0 0 0 5 9 -0 --71 Pedestrians Jane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Pe�Fqent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) edian type None None Median storage veh) - -146 VC,-conflicting volume 78 65 147 146 65 151 79, vC1,stage I conf vol conf,vol tC, single (s) 4.1 . 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 0 queue Tr-ee-% 100 100 100 100 99 99 77100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1520 1537 820 745 999 812 745 982 Pirecb6h',','l11ah&-# Ell 1 W13 1 'NB'1 N13 2 - S13 1 57,77. 7" Volume Total 65 -79 0 5 10 ,Vo-lurpe Left 0 1 0 0 9 Volume Right 0 0 0 5 1 �SH - 11520 1537 1700 999 628 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 P-ue-ue Length 0 0 0 0 1 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.1 0.0 8.6 9.4 5-ne-LOS - A A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.1 8.6 9.4 Pwroach LOS A A �0- EyeLrag-WCelay Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.2% ICU Level of Service A • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Oak Street & N. 27th 3/4/2004 Mov6mebt07-77 77777Y EBLr"T BT ,E BR741 WBL;w,NBT w W BR NBL3,,,N BT N BR Lane Configurations N -r L'-- #'; �M Al.'111-+'--.- -' - - �ign Control Free Free - - -Stop Stop-----7 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% jVolume(veh/h)_ 0 101 11 22 58 6 3 -- 4 68 23 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houdy flow rate(veh/h) 0 flo 12 24 63 7 3 4 74 25 17 Pedestrians ane Width t) Walking Speed (ft/s) Fe-rcent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) None None Median storage veh) FC,conflicting volume 70 122 204 233 61 245 236-3 5. vC1,stage 1 conf vol PC2,stage 2 conf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 I tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 0 queue free%_ 100 0 98 -100 90 93 96 97 1 cM capacity(veh/h) 1529 1463 712 655 992 626 653 1030 EB.T, EB 2',z'EB 3 WB T-',WB 2 WB 3 Ns 1 8139 Volume Total 0 73 49 24 42 21 82 25 17 Volume Left 0 0 0 24 0 0 3 25 a Volume Right 0 0 12 0 0 7 74 0 0 tiSH -- - 1 1700- 1700 1700 1463 1700 1700 951 626 653 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.04 0.03 ueue_Length(ft) 0 0 a 1 0 0 7 3 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 9.1 11.0 10.7 Fane-LOS A A 8 8 Approach Delay(s) 0.0 1.9 9.1 10.9 Ppproach LOS A 9 Overage Delay 4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.2% ICU Level of Service A E-- • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILI-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 V, M6vei-hdnt W;&; 4EBLfiUBTW,�EBRj,'� -4 .'MBR SBL k.�' SBT, SBR YVBQ, WBT •: Y Lane Configurations -4 deal hpl)- --Igoo 1900 1900 1900 1900-- 1900--igoo 1900 19001900 A 19 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Facto_Lane Util, r -1.00- 1.00 1.00 0.95 1-.00 0v95 Frt 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 It Protected 0v98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1714 1740 1770 3510 1770 3525 F�ItPerm�MEO 0.71 ON 0.10-- 1.00 0.10 TOO Satd. Flow(perm) 1240 1301 191 3510 195 3525 Volume(vph) 83 44 115 91 81 102___ 90­-1458 84 32 1386 3 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 dj. Flow 1) W 48 125 99 88 111 98--1595-9-1-35-1-601-4 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 263 0 0 298 0 98 1676 0 35 1548 0 um Type TPerm _Perr� - . pt �TPK Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 _1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.4 15.4 39.3 36.0 37.7 35.2 EfFective Green, 17.4 17.4 41.8 39.0 40.2 38.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.59 0.55 0.57 0.54 LClearance Time(s) 6.0 3.5 . 7.0 3.5 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 bane Grp Cap(vph) 306 322 176 1944 156 1913 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.48 0.01 0.44 • PTR-abo Perm 0.21 c0.23 0.31 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.93 0.56 0.86 0.22 0.81 pnifo-rm Delay,dl 25.3 25.9 11.1 -1304 1-1 e 5-1 3A Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental IDOOM2_ 20.6 - 31.3 3.-8-4-2- 0.7 _2.63­7 Delay(s) 46.0 57.2 14.8 17.6 12.2 15.8 1;fiveel-of Service D E B B 9 T____1 Approach Delay(s) 46.0 57.2 17.5 15.7 rpproach LOS - D E B j7qt:e-rseO-q-p7 HCM Average_Control`_bea__Ly �217 ""-,--HqVEeve_I­6f Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 �ctuateidCyqle Length(s) - 70.4 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.4% ICU Level of Service E F7Ud-Ucal Lane Group • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILI-ST51 � i HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Oak Street & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 A"v BR, W BT BRW_NBC N PT' RqKSPJ Ti" S89 Lane Configurations ideal Flow 1900 1500-- 1900 1900 1900 1900 11900 1900 1900-- --1960, 1900 19 Total Lost time(s) 4.0. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 It Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1825 1770 1863 1583 1770 3436 1770 3474 It Permitted 0.62 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.10 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1150 1825 660 1863 1583 406 3436 177 3474 Kdkwne(vph) - - 162- _24_ 436-- -268 184 --- 38____ -981 238 _226 965- - 126 Peak-hour factor, PHIF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 dj. Flow 1) 183 165 26 47-3 226 200 41 1079 259 248 984 1371 Lane Group Flow(vph) 183 191 0 473 226 200 41 1332 0- 248 1121 0 um 'yLe Perm pm+pt Over Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.9 15.9 37.9 37.9 10.0 35.0 35.0 49.0 49.0 Pffective Green,g (s) 17.9 17.9 39.9 39.9 10.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.40 0.40 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.52 0.52 r,learance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 [ine Grp-Cap-(vph) 206 327 464 144 158- 164 1307 - 262 1808 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.18 0.12 c0.13 0.39 0.10 0.32 • P/s Ratio Perm 0.16 c0.22 0.10 c0.41 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.58 1.02 0.30 1.27 0.27 1.02 0.98 0.62 Pnifoxrn Delay,dl 40.0 37.6 26.8 20.5 45.0 21.3 31.0 28.6 7377._05______� Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 33.6 2.7 46.8 0.2 160.1 4.2 29.8 51.9 1.6 Delay(s) 73.7 40.2 73.6 20.7 205.1 25.5 60.8 80.5 18.6 [evel of Service E D E C F C IE F 7--F-7 Approach Delay(s) 56.6 89.6 59.7 29.8 ?%pproach LUS E F E C jjjj��M Jill mill 11111111 111111MINNINIM111M hcglkvE:�rige-C-o--n--tr-ol-D-el-a----- HCM Level of Service E J'� HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 �ctuated Cycle Length (s) 99.9 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.4% ICU Level of Service F Critical Lane Group • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th.Ave 3/4/2004 § Tv poverneh W B L�:7' W B TT," T 4,NBR BL,�Q74�$BT 7.E13V BR, S Lane Configurations deal 5_ Od 1900 j hpl) 1906 1900 1900 1900 1900 igoo jAnn 19 goo 1966 igoq Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ra-Q-4"U tij IffiFactor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.99 0.59-0.05 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1672 1674 1770 3535 1770 3538 FITP-ermitted 0.90 0.91 0.16 1.0-0 0.16 _70_0_____� Satd. Flow(perm) 1522 1545 297 3535 306 3538 Volume(vph) - __ 40 i - - 6 -69 22 __ __9____ 64-­ 30-1-226 10 - 47 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ... Flow(vph)__ 43 7 97 24 10 70 33 1333 11 51 " 1359 4,1 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 147 0 0 104 0 33 1344 0 51 1363 0 Tum Type_ -Perm ---Perm-- p- Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 �ermW�eqPhases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 10.0 43.6 43.6 43.6 43.6 fictive Green,9 (s) 12.0 12.0 46.6 46.6 46.6 46.6 1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 ,Mearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane GM Cap(vph). 274 278 208 2473 214 _2476 v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 c0.39 • P;T Ratio Penn C0.10 0.07 0.11 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.37 0.16 0.54 0.24 0.55 Pnifomllelay,dl 24.8 24.0 3.4 4.8 3.6 4.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fn_qremental Delay,d2 2.0 0.8 -T 6-0.9 2.6 0.9 Delay(s) 26.8 24.8 5.0 5.7 6.2 5.8 Fevel of Service C C A A A Y� Approach Delay(s) 26.8 24.8 5.7 5.8 �pproacfi LOS C C A A g(h, KCM-Average- Control beiay_______ 7.4 HCM Level of Service A ] __ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 ,Actuated Cycle Length(s) 66.6 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% ICU Level of Service A �nfiqdGne Group • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Durston & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 Poyemdnt.X&' R a,:. .L 4-rEBL-.-I EBT ,,k,,EBR:, BL WW, ,NBI_r :::'NBT,*;'..,,,--i-NBR,"f SF3L-7-,,,'.-- BT 7,71 Lane Configurations y ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 igoo-igoo T+ 190o lqnn 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.-Faktor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 FIt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1-.00 0.95 TOO Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1840 1770 1788 1770 3374 1770 3453 Fit-Permitted 0.06 1.00 - --0-.06 1.00 OAO__1._00 0.23 1.00----1 Satd. Flow(perm) 113 1840 113 1788 741 3374 430 3453 LVolurne(vph) 9-44- 82 - 1-6-1- --'8'51 308 118- 309 140 -298 31-4: - --611 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 dj. Flow 1) 178 993 89 175 925 335 128 336-152 324 3477776 Lane Group Flow(vph) 178 1082 0 175 1260 0 128 488 0 324 407 0 pm+p �M+IS t_ pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Pe-rmitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G(s) 78.5 64.5 78.2 64.6 42.9 30.4 49.9 33.9 Fffe_ctiv6 Green,_g_(s) 80.0 6640 80.2 66.1 "A 3100 517 35-.4­1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.46 0.56 0.46 0.31 0.22 0.36 0.25 Plearance Time(s) 4.0 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Pne GM Cap_(yph)_ 224 843 225 821 318 747 302 �849 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.59 0.08 c0.70 0.03 0.14 c0.12 0.12 • W/s Ratio Perm 0.36 0.36 0.09 c0.26 v/c Ratio 0.79 1.28 0.78 1.53 0.40 0.65 1.07 0.48 liniform Ue-lay,_dl __2 WO 42.6 38.9 37.3 5190 4007 46-4---7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental relay,d2 1704 I36.6 15*5 2446*8 0.8 2._1 725 0.4 Delay(s) 82.7 175.6 58.1 285.7 38.2 53.1 113.2 46.9 revel of Service F F E r 0 b F 7_D_____1 Approach Delay(s) 162.5 258.0 50.0 76.3 [§proach LOS F F_ _ D E 7 H)CM Average Control_ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.26 Kc-tuated Cycle�Leng�th(s) 144.0 Sum of lost time(s)- 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 135.2% ICU Level of Service H Critical Lane Goo-up 2014 Background (w/ Phase 1)-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Davis Lane 3/4/2004 'All Movement�- EBT.-..E R,.-IWBLSMWBTAtWBR.JMNBU,,W--'NBTgt�NBRWWS�B SBT f �* �B!Jft *6 13 wSBf Lane Configurations - -. SignControl. Free Free Stop stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% �Volume-(veh/fi) 25 115 1- ---0- 98 34 0 1 -0 -12 2 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 FiouHy flow rate(veh/h) -27 1-25- 1 0 107 37 0 -1 - --0 13 2 13, Pedestrians -771 I-ane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) edian type None None Median storage veh) PC,conflicting volume 143 126 319 323 126 305 _305 125 vC1,stage 1 conf vol jVC2,­sta-g--e 2-c-onf-vol tC, single(s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 [C,2 stage(s) - - I tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 �O queue free% 98 100 100 100 100 98 _100_ 9 cM capacity(veh/h) 1439 1460 614 583 925 637 597 926 PiFCctid-nj, Lwa-he#TWF-7 ER%W13j,7119,N 1311 Ts NffZrl, Volume Total 153 143 0 1 28 jVo-1 u nn-eLeft - 27 0- 0 0 13 Volume Right 1 37 0 0 13 IbSH:,'' 1439 1460 1700 583 739 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 Pueue Length(ft) 1 0' O -70 3 Control Delay(s) 1.5 0.0 0.0 11.2 10.1 Fa ne-LOS ,A 1 1, A B B Approach Delay(s) 1.5 0.0 11.2 10.1 [kpproach LOS B B jntdr-sect ion]Su-mnja MIR 1101� v�er a 9 e'Le Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.1% ICU Level of Service A • 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N. 27th 3/4/2004 Mo7eent E BR.RWRHWW..BT&WRR.ELNIBLMN B-,TA N.BRWSB]LqKS�� Lane Configurations A", 4Z), 5 "Ji" 4" Free stop' . Stop SZign Control �Free Grade 0% 0% 0% .0% V51E�m7e (yek/h) _ �11 �,:115 0 5 ",11119 -, 12 :�' -- -0-, --, -9 3 0 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly�dy flow rate(veh/h) -1 .-,125 0 -129 7-71-3 0 0 0 3 Pedestrians �ane Wiathr Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage'kagd''. 777771 Right turn flare(veh) None None Median storage veh) ,K conflicting volume��7,- 142 125 277 280 125 277 vC1,stage 1 conf vol VC2,-st5g&2 can-f tC,single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 LC,'2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 0�queuefr6e,% •j 00 '100 100 100 0 0 -.100 100, cM capacity(veh/h) 1440 1462 670 625 926 671 630 913 wj Fq-c U 71 v MR-ei;V,I N N FEW IN 11 NNB 1 wNB 2 n S�Bk F IN w IM Volume Total 126 148 0 3 7 • Volume Left -------------------------------- Volume Right 0 13 0 3 3 S H gke '144 462 .,,926 7 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 y 'Queue; 7 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.3 0.0 8.9 9.7 -A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.3 8.9 9.7 F00657WXQ 77 -8 7-17 A, -Rte--CS7eMcti7nT9r W,p=a -7 Delay I��- O��' Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.4% ICU Level of Service A 77 2014 Background (w/Phase 1)-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Oak Street & N. 27th 3/4/2004 jAoV6ment7 77.,EBL : BT •EBR .-.WBL`.:��,.,WBT,,i�WBR,�%,,,k�NBL..,,-,"Y.NBT NBR SBL SBT 9BR Lane Configurations ,8ig-n-Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veFT/h)- 0 82 9 89 138 -23 15, 17 46- --13 ---6---0Q Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 0 89 10 97 150 25 16 18 501-4 10 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) - Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage _ Right turn flare(veh) None None Median storage veh) PC- conflicting volume 175 99 367 -463 49 460 -455-8 vC1, stage 1 conf vol -,VC2, stage 2'3onf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 IC,2 stage(s) I tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 �O queue free% 100 94 97 96 95 97 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1399 1492 528 463 1008 425 467 953 Pirecb6n,land " EBIT EB:2,..�".EB'3' Wffl WR2i,VB 3 r I V' S13 2 Volume Total -0 59 39 97 100 15 85 14 10 Volume left 0 0 0 ---97 0 0 16 14 0 Volume Right 0 0 10 0 0 25 50 0 0 FSH 1700 1700 1700 1492 1700 1700 704 425 467 -- Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.12 0.03 0.02 Lengthueue .0 0 0 5 0 0 10 3 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 -0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 10.8 13.8 12.9 Fane-LOS A B B B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 2.7 10.8 13.4 F�pproach LOS 9 8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.3% ICU Level of Service A 2014 Background (w/ Phase 1)-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 %ArC T­".'EBL BT.1 l3RWNRLk',-1.,j,NI3,TM. .N-RR[w &98QL--SI3T47�_--7w-R Lane Configurations 13 14 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1906 og Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 -4.0 4.0 �TrL_e 1.00 0.95 Util. Factor 1.00 i.0-01- 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.94 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 rlt Protected- 0.98 0.98 0995 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1730 1723 1770 3503 1770 3515 FIt -ermitted 0._84_ _ 0.83 0o13 1.00 0-.35 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1480 1446 234 3503 657 3515 Volume 49 3-7 --60 _.44 29- - _66- 72 609 44_ T53 1-189- - Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 dj. Flow 1) 93 40 65 48 32-63 78 662 48 58 -1292 671 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 158 0 0 143 0 78 710 0 58 1353 0 um Type -­FWrT�---=__P64n - pm+pt - m Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 ermitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G (s) 8.3 8.3 31.7 29.0 31.7 29.0 Effective Green,g(s) -10.3 10.3 34*2-32-.0- 34.2 32.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.61 0.57 0.61 0.57 Plearance Time 6.0 6.0 3.5 7.0 3.5 -7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Pne '1r_P_­Ca N h �_270 ---264_ 20-1-1984 "1 1991 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02* 0.20 0.01 c0.38 • /s Ratio Perm C0.1 1 0.10 0.22 0.07 1 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.54 0.39 0.36 0.13 0.68 Pnifomn-Delay,d! 2171 _21-.0 67.2 6.7 4.6 8.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental DeliTy_,d2 3:2 23 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.9 Delay(s) 24.4 23.2 7.5 6.8 4.7 9.6 bevel of Service C C A A T A____7 Approach Delay(s) 24.4 23.2 - 6.8 9.4 [Approacff EOS r C C A -A y ���i&NLa .3 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Nc-tuated Cycle 56.5 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% ICU Level of Service B Critical Lane Group 2014 Buildout-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILI-ST51 • 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Oak Street & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 .1w �S (We M Chi tMWU=ff q E B I!Wi E BTM E RR,-IrW B QTjw B TOM BRA N1312 BTj7rNBRT�K,­SBIJ S BT S R Lane Configurations ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 6-1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1906 190- 190 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 rane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1 wOO 0w95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 It Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1-.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1778 1770 1863 1583 1770 3351 1770 3504 F11tPermitted 0.70 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.24- '!900 0.20 770_0____� Satd. Flow(perm) 1311 1778 345 1863 1583 454 3351 365 3504 V616 e_(v h) 113 M -09 224 75 58- 39 518 2841_17­7____ Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 dj. Flow i)_ _ _ ___123Zt_7____108 243­82-63-42-563 309_127_986_70Q, Lane Group Flow(vph) 123 355 0 243 82 63 42 872' 0 127 1056 0 Perm _P�erm p�+p Over PE+pt � Protected Phases 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 15.6 26.6 26.6 4.8 32.0 32.0 40.8 40.8 lEffectiv6 Green,g(s) 17.6 17.6 2856 28.6 4.8 85:0 95*0 43.8 43.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.36 0.36 0.06 -0.44 0.44 0.54 0.54 Pearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4_.0 -_ 7.0 7.0 4.0 770____j Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 - 1-0- 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - 3.0 3.0 3.0 ane GrpC_ a--p(v'p h) 287 389 247----663 y95 198 1459 283 1909 v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.09 0.04 0.04 c0.26 0.03 c0.30 F/s Ratio PermPerm 0.09 c0.26 0.09 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.91 0.98 0.12 0.66 0.21 0.60 0.45 0.55 Oniform Delay,a 1. _ 27*1 30.6 23.1-i 7:5 37.0 14.1 17.3 10.9-11.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1'.0., 25.2 5264 0.1-1 6.11 2.4 1.8 1*1 -1.2 Delay(s) 28.1 55.9 75.5 17.5 53.1 16.6 19.1 12.0 13.1 revel of Service C E. . E _B_D� B B 9- Approach Delay(s) 48.7 59.6 19.0 13.0 NpLoach LOS D E B Iff t_e�cecbp-q_ 59ff- rfi-a-ryA iCM Average Control Delay 26.7-"r _HGM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 ?�ctuated Cycle Length(s) 80.4 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service F Critical Lane Group• _ 2014 Buildout-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 povem6nt BR 7, SBL" 'SBT . SBR, EBT;_.",EBR WBL :WBT. WBR ' NBL NBT Lane Configurations deal Flow(vph-1)- -1 goo 1900 1900 1900-1 _1900 1900 1900 1900 1900--liob-19-00 P 900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ra-ne UtirFactor 1.00 1.00 - 1-.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 .7 Frt 0.90 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1900 0.95 1.00 --1 Satd. Flow(prot) 1654 1636 1770 3537 1770 3538 Fit Permitted 0.94 1.00 0.17 1600 0.37 1.00 Satd.Satd. Flow(perm) 1567 1636. 313 3537 684 3538 17 _4 81 0 1­ 8' --68 672--- - -4- 1263 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 �Adj. Flow 1) 19 4 73 0 1 9 74 730. 3 -4-137 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 95 0 0 10 0 74 733 0 4 1376 0 r _t P rm um Perm --- -Perm-- erm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.1 8.1 53.6 53.6 53.6 53.6 F_ff6c6Ve_G_re_en,g(s) 1041- 10.1 56:6 56.6 56.6 _56.6- Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 ,Clearance Time(s) 6.0 6e0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 a 66_6rQCa p(vp fi) 212 221 237 2680 T 518. _2681­__ v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.21 c0.39 "/ Ratio Perm c0.06 0.24 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.05 0.31 0.27 0.01 0.51 Pnifo-milDelay,al 29.7- 26.1-- 269 2:8 2.-2-3:6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 [ncremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.1 3.4 Off 0.0 �7 Delay(s) 31.2 28.2 6.3 3.0 2.2 4.3 revel of Service C G_ A A A A_-__j Approach Delay(s) 31.2 28.2 3.3 4.3 Fpproach 108 C C A KC M Average Control-Delay -6-.2 _HCM Le-V e I of PService A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 �ctuate�dCycle Length(s) 74.7 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.9% ICU Level of Service C E_-Critical_Lane Group • 2014 Buildout-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Durston & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 Voveaientf77'777­' Lane Configurations deal Flow(vphpl) - g- ---1906 1900 1066-160 00 1900 1900 _19OO__19OO_i9OO_ 00 1_ Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Fane-Util, Factor 1.00 -1306 1.6-0 TOO 1.00 0.95 1.00 0M-7-1 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 r1tPro-tected- 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1827 1770 1808 1770 3391 1770 3437 It Permitted0.07 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.21 1.00- 0.38 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 122 1827 114 1808 398 3391 717 3437 fold -&ph) ' - 126 5_96 88-- 263 -882--- 213 - 110 �2 11- 82 264�­463 1_08, Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 j)-137 648 96 286 959-282 120 229 89-276- 492 1171 Lane Group Flow(vph) 137 744 0 286 1191 0 120 318 0 276 609 0 um Type_ Qm+pt pm+pt pm+p pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 71.7 59.6 84.5 68.4 43.5 31.3 50.9 35.0 Fffe_ctive­Green,_g(s) 73.2 61.1 86.0 69.9 4590 32-.8 52.4 36.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.42 0.59 0.48 0.31 0.22 0.36 0.25 rlearance Time(s) 4.0 5.5 4.5 -5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0- 3.0 3.0. 20 3.0 3.0 �ane_Grktip_(vph)_ 197 _76_1 ­7' 303 861 T236 758 - 855 v/s Ratio Prot 0,06 0*41 c0.13 c0.66 0*04 0*01 c0.08 0*18 k/s_Ratio Perm 0.29 0.42 0.11 C0.19 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.98 0.94 1.38 0.51 0.42 0.75 0.71 ,UniForm Delay, all- -66.9 42.1 49.3 38.4 38*9-478-.8 37.4 50.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2_10.2 26.8 -36-.87-179.7 1.7 0.4 8.0 -2e8 ­j Delay(s) 77.1 69.0 86.0 218.1 40.6 49.2 45.4 53.1 revel of Service 5 E F _F 0 D 1) Approach Delay(s) 70.2 192.5 46.8 50.7 Ppproach 109 E F 0 1) jht6rsebtiWSUrrj vaq . W. _1111111111W sagnimmlw,.MWO H-CM Average-Control Delay ­ 1-11Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 �ctuate�dCycle Length(s) 1467 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 125.7% ICU Level of Service H Critical Lane Group • 2014 Buildout-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILI-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Davis Lane 3/4/2004 DEB L--:'E13T"f-''EBR `,WBL-!W8 ,.Wl3R NBL'1i>,,'N13T'-:. N8R'1`: SBLt"",,Sl3T,,!,-' 913 Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% olume 1) 1 61 0 0 74 11 1 4 0 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 dourly flow rate(veh/h) 1 66 0 0 80 12 1 4 0 11 1 16 Pedestrians �ane Width (f Walking Speed (ft/s) ercent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) kCj,-conflicting volume 92 66 172 161 66 157 -755�8q vC1,stage 1 conf vol kC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Y tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0- 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 F 0 queue free% 100 100 100 99 100 99 1-66 - 0> cM capacity(veh/h) 1502 1535 777 731 997 805 736 972 Pirectfb6,Tane#-'? `. E131 WB 1" N13 1 'iNB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 67 92 . 1 4 28 • i olume Left 1 0 1 0 11 Volume Right 0 12 0 0 16 ,EZS H _ _ _ 1502 1535 777 731 890 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 ueue Length(ft) - - -- 0 0 0 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.6 10.0 9.2 Lane-LOS A A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.9 9.2 �.pproach LOS A A �A�rage Delay 1.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.0% ICU Level of Service A • 2014 Buildout-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBIL1-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N. 27th 3/4/2004 N WBT'--WBR NBL NBT ;.-'NBR77 SBL ,,',,Sl3T'-"Sl3R, Lane Configurations Zvi 4" _9ign Control Free Free --stop Stoo I Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(Ve-Flh) 0 74- 0 3 77 0 0 0 11 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly fl6w--rate(veK/h) 0 80 0 3 84 0 0 0 -12 9 6 -71 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Fee - rcent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) �ecrian type�ty.. _ - None None Median storage veh) C,conflicting volume 84 - 80 172 171 80 183 171 vC1,stage 1 conf vol RC2,stage 2 conf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 L - --- - - - I - - - I tF(s) 2.2 1 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 bO-queue free% 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1513 1517 789 721 980 768 721 976 Pir6cfi6K,1Ldne# El3*1 W8 1 N13:1 ' NB 2;'M 1 M Volume Total 80 87 0 12 10 • Lolume Left 0 -3 0 0 9 Volume Right 0 .0 0 12 1 tSH 1313 .1517 1700 980 786 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 ueue Length (ft) -- - 0. 0 0 1 1 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.3 0.0 8.7 9.6 [57e-LOS A A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.3 8.7 9.6 F,pproach LOS- A "I .77w't' 77 Fy�ii­6 6 Delay-L-� Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.7% ICU Level of Service A • 2014 Buildout-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Oak Street & N. 27th 3/4/2004 EBT-. "EBR '.WBIL -W13T , WBR NBL NBT NBR SIBIL SBT SIB Lane Configurations 8-ign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% jV61-6me(veh/ 0 158 40 22 79 17 14 14 68 52 42 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 F-OutLy flow rate7(yEhh1h)- - 0 172 43 24 86 18 15 15 74 57----46-----'0', Pedestrians ane Width 1) Walking Speed (ft/s) ercent (age Right turn flare (veh) edian type None None Medianstorage veh) K,conflicting volume 104 215 307 346 108 310 358 52, vC1, stage 1 conf vol kqg, stage 2 conf vol tC,single(s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 K,:2 stage tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 KAueue free% 100 98 97 97 92 90 92 10 cM capacity(veh/h) 1485 1352 576 566 926 550 557 1004 Pir6d0hi'Lin6# E 1 f f'4 EB 2:. E B 3 WB 1 , WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 0 114 101 24 57 47 104 57 46 fume Leff 0 0 0 24 0 0 15 677 0 Volume Right 0 0 43 0 0 18 74 0 0 �SH 1700 1700 1700 1352 1700 1700 783 550 557 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.10 0.08 Pueue Length (ft) 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 7 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 6.6 6.6 10-.312.3 12.0 rq-n 7e L-(?S A B B B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 1.4 10.3 12.2 Fpproach LOS - -------- B B 4.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.0% ICU Levelof Service A • 2014 Buildout-AM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Baxter Lane & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 ovement:- EBL: BR WBL R ._' NBL NBT NBR "SB ; :,SBT_ SBR Lane Configurations ' ! .41 deal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 000 1900 1900 1900 1900 091 0 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ane Util. Factor 1.00 __ 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 It Protected 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1718 1743 1770 3510 1770 3520 T Permitted 0.69 0.74 0.10 1:00 0.11 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1209 1320 194 3510 198 3520 olume(vph) _ 92 48­115 -91 88 102 90 1462-` - 84 32 1393 _53 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 c dj. Flow vph) 1)0 52 125 99 96 111 98 1589 91 35 1514 58 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 277 0 0 306 0 98 1680 0 35 1572 0 um Type P_e_rm- _Perm m --- pm+pt -pm+pt - - Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.1 16.1 38.8 35.5 37.2 34.7 ffective Green,_g (s) 18.1 _ 18.1 41.3 38.5 39.7 37.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.58 0.55 0.56 0.53 learance Time(s) _ 6.0__ 6.0 3.5 7.0 3.5 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Fan e Grp Cap(vph) 310 338 176 1914 156 1880- y v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.48 0.01 0.45 • ,V/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.23 0.30 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.91 0.56 0.88 0.22 0.84 Uniform Delay,d1 25.3___ _ _ _ 25.4 11.7 14.0 12.0 13.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 26.0 26.4 3.8 4.9 0.7 3.4 Delay(s) 51.3 51.8 15.5 18.9 12.8 17.3 revel of Service D D B 131 B B Approach Delay(s) 51.3 51.8 18.7 17.2 proach LOS D D B B nterSeC 1011. OnitTlaryj p!K'x,d8 '' 7 7.7. . CMWveFage Control Delay 22.9 = HCM`Level of Service C - - - _ - HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 1 ctuated Cycle Length(s) 70.6 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.7% ICU Level of Service E c Critical Lane Group is2014 Buildout-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBIL1-ST51 • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Oak Street & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 .. ' •r-- '• '`b� ; •f� •}• " ' ft'e`; .te.� III. �`A5 1�KJ,Y' �' �� till .T�, :Ib� t�l. :�`, •,`.'11 ovement EBL' EBT: EBR BL ,. BT,, BR: : L .'NB77T NBR- :SBLI,=*,.,SBT SBR Lane Configurations _ ' ideal FI_ow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 91 0 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0:95 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 It Protected _ 0.95 - 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 J.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1794 1770 1863 1583 1770 3437 1770 3474 It Permitted 0.59 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.11 1.00 Satd.mFlow(perm) 1107 1794 505 1863 1583 370 3437 196 3474 olue(vph) _�a 169 176 57 435 247y- -188 �93 1005 238 �231__'916 128 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 �dj. Flow(vph) 184 191 62 473 268 204 101 1092 259 251 996 139, Lane Group Flow(vph) 184 253 0 473 268 204 101 1351 0 251 1135 0 um Type Perm _ pm+pt Over -Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.4 15.4 34.4 34.4 7.0 31.0 31.0 42.0 42.0 ffective Green,g (s) 17.4 17A 36.4 39.4 7.0 34.0 : 34.0 45.0 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.50 0.50 .Clearance Time(s) 6.0 6.0 _ _ __4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ane Grp Cap(vph) 115 349 159 124 141 1307 222 1749 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.19 0.14 c0.13 0.39 0.09 0.33 Fs Ratio Perm 0.17 c0.27 0.27 c0.48 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.72 1.13 0.35 1.65 0.72 1.03 1.13 0.65 niform Delay,d1 341.8 33.8 22.8 18.3 41.2 23.6 27.7 22.9 16.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ncremental Delay,d2 26.7 7.3 85.0 0.3 323.5 26.7 34.0 100.0 1.9 Delay(s) 61.5 41.0 107.8 18.6 364.7 50.3 61.7 122.9 18.3 ILevel of Service E D F B F D E F B Approach Delay(s) 49.7 138.0 60.9 37.2 la.pproacfi LOS D F E D CMAverage Control Delay 69.2 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.14 ctuated Cycle Length (s) 89.4 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.3% ICU Level of Service G c -Critical Lane Group is2014 Buildout- PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40: Tschache Ln & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 'till, VdVement EsUi.`,,9BT, M WBL WBT WBR NB L NBT N BR T7 SBR. Lane Configurations fdeal Flow-(V-001) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -1000 1900 1906--1900---1-9-0-0 1900 igog Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 lane-0w. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 O-m- Frt 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IFft Protected 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1671 1678 1770 3535 1770 3536 It Permitted0.90 0.91 0.16 1.00 0.16 , 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1524 1540 289 3535 300 3536 Wolume(vph) - - ____43 ____ 7 102 -U- - 11 - 64- 52 -1227 __10 4:7 1252- Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Kd:j. Flow(vp ) 47 8 ill 24 12 70 57-1354 11 51 1361 91 Lane Group Flow--(vph) 0_166, --0 0_106 O 57 1345 0 51 1370 0 lu-m-Ty-p-e Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 rermitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G (s) 9.9 9.9 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 �ffective Green, 11.9 11.9 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 Plearance Time 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 bane Grp Cap(vph) 288 291 198 2417 205 2417 v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 c0.39 • /s Ratio Perm C0.11 0.07 0.20 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.36 0.29 0.56 0.25 0.57 Prif6rm Delay,dl 23.2 22.2 8.9 5.1 3.8 5.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Increrr�e_ntal_Delay,d2 2.8 0.8 3.6 0.9 2.9 1.0 Delay(s) 26.0 23.0 7.6 6.0 6.7 6.1 I,evel of Service C C A A A _::A Approach Delay(s) 26.0 23.0 6.1 6.1 �pproach LOS C C A A 1iJt6r9k,CPri so HONIAverage Control belay 1.7 HCM Level of Service --A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 ctuated Cycle Length(s) 62.9 Sum of lost times 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.0% ICU Level of Service B ,F Critical LaneLane Group 2014 Buildout-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 • 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 46: Durston & N 19th Ave 3/4/2004 M -' WBR`7�-71NIBL. , NBT�:. NBR:j��,7,SBL:,���.-gBT,-,,,!.,gB bNement'!­ W;�� EBL EBT�,? EBR MBL��. WBT Lane Configurations deal Flow(vphpl) 1 960-1900 1900 1906 -1966 1-000 -1900 1900 1900--190-0-1-966 1-900, Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0- 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vane Dtil. Factor 1.00 1 e00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 .0.98 It-Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 11.60-0-.95-1-.00 0m95' 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1838 1770 1784 1770 3389 1770 3458 It Permitted 0.06 1.00 0.06-1n00 0.36 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 115 1838 114 1784 676 3389 374 3458 89 161- 1�b 40- -6-2 y6I_Ume­Cv �16_6_ _918- - 858 4 341- Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 180-998 -97 175 933_3_63 140 394 152 34-1-371 _67j Lane Group Flow(vph) 180 1095 0 175 1296 0 140 536 0 341 438 0 �-UM Type -_ pm m+pt - _m+pt p - P - Protected Phases .7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 �e�itt�edPhases -4 8 2 , ' 61 1 Actuated Green,G (s) 77.5 63.5 . 77.2 63.6 43.8 30.9 50.0 34.0 7 effective Gree .6_6540 79.2-65:11 4637-32.4 5195 35.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.45 0.32 0.23 0.36 0.25 Plearance Ti 4-.0--5.5 i 4.5 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0- 5_' Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.6 n6 Grp Cap(vpfi)� M 633 226 80-9-- 312- 165 _.290 - 866 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.60 0.08 c0.73 0.04 0.16 c0.13 0.13 • 17/s Ratio PermPerm 0.36 0.35 0.10 c0.29 v/c Ratio 0.80 1.31 0.77 1.60 0.45 0.70 1.18 0.51 Vn_if6F_Delay,al 69-.039-.2 42.1 392 36v8_51.1 39.6-4 6.5--1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Dela7,-d2 16.1 150a1- 15.2 _2761 •11.0 -269-109-.2- 0n5 Delay(s) 83.2 189.3 57.3 315.9 37.8 54.0 148.9 47.1 �evel of Service F-5 E F D-15) F 0­71 Approach Delay(s) 174.3 285.1 50.7 91.6 Fkpproach LOS F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.33 [�ctuated Cycle 143.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 138.4% ICU Level of Service H t Critical Lane_Group 7� 2014 Buildout-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Baxter Lane & Davis Lane 3/4/2004 W B R N B L -S R Voyern&O" zA�,jr,"-','EBLi,,i�,,,EBT��,��EBR W131f,", NBT.��., N13R;`,,,,�SI3L �,iSIBT,7 Lane Configurations -#01 % Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop- Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% jVolume(veh/h)_ -25 117 -2 0 99 38 0 2 0 19- 4- -12 Peak-Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 - 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) - 27 -127 2 0 108 41 0 T 0 21 4 13 Pedestrians rwne­Widl#h(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Rercent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) -None None Median storage veh) �C,conflicting volume 149 129 326 332 128 312 3-12 129 vC1, stage 1 conf vol �C2,stage 2 conf vol tC,single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 IC,2 stage(s) tF.(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 �O queue(Fee-% 98 100 100 100 100 97 99 99, cM capacity(veh/h) 1433 1456 606 577 922 629- 592 922 P i re 6t i diTF LrdrfEi# EBA WB SB;;'l 71��?,NB.l "NB'2 Volume Total 157 149 0 2 38 • LTMILFe Le ft 27 0 0 Volume Right 2 41 0 0 13 bSH r 1433 1456 1700 577 701 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 Pueue Length(ft) 1 0 -0 - - 0- - 4 Control Delay(s) 1.4 0.0 0.0 11.3. 10.4 Lane LOS A A 9 8 Approach Delay(s) 1.4 0.0 11.3 10.4 jkpproach L09 B --B ihie"f§k-ti5n7.su-wa7.=ll�MMI,IlllllI --- ---- - Ky-Er!j§e Delay" 1.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.5% ICU Level of Service A 2014 Buildout-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 i • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Baxter Lane & N 27th Ave 3/4/2004 Ow" fd , ,SBR,overriefit. EBL �-EBT EBR WBL, c.Wl3T.--,WBR,`1Nl3L NBT NBR�...-,;'SBL SBT Lane Configurations 44 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% LVolume(veh/h) 1 124 -6 -1 f 134 12 0 0 7 3 7-0 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 F16udy flow rate(yefi/h) _ 1 135 0 13 146 13 0 0 8 3 Pedestrians Fa-n e Width Walking Speed (ft/s) Fer-qentBlockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type _ ____ None None Median storage veh) LVC,conflicting volume 159 135 318 322 135 323 315 15 vC1,stage 1 conf vol conf vol tC,single (s) 4'.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 JC*2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 00 queue free % 100 99 100 100 99 99 100 100, cM capacity(veh/h) 1421 1450 627 590 914 620 595 894 Pirection; ane# EB 1' WB 1 N131, Nl32'-t-Sl31,,L`�1,• : Volume Total 136 172 0 8 7 Volume Left 1 13 0 0 3 Volume Right 0 13 0 8 3 SH 1421 1450 1700 914 732 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 QLueue Length 0 1 0 1 1 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.6 0.0 9.0 10.0 Fa ine-L 0-S I A A A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.6 9.0 10.0 Ppproach LOS A A W'77' �4verage Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.8% ICU Level of Service A • 2014 Buildout-PM*Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILI-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Oak Street & N. 27th 3/4/2004 MovMent.7 EBL -EBT-,':;..EBR WBL WBT-WBR7 NBL-,-NBT NBR SBL ;.'SS �-SBR, Lane Configurations Sign Coritrol^ Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volum-�e(ve-h/fi) 010- 29 89 202 55 . 47-46- 46 33 --27 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 0 132 32 97 220-60- 51 50 50 36 - 29-0, Pedestrians �ane Width- (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type _ None None Median storage veh) ,VC,conflicting volume 279 163 -465-620 82 584 606 14 vC1, stage 1 conf vol WC2.stage 2 f v 6 1 tC, Ngle (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 - 71 tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 00 queue free % 100 93 88 87 95 89 92�1 00 cM capacity(veh/h) 1280 1413 429 375 962 319 382 883 I) 7t,�:ifection Lane# EB, EB 2 . EB 3 WB 1 WB'2 Volume Total 0 88 75 97 146 133 151 36 29 ,Volume Left 0 0 0 97--0--- 0---51- -36 0 Volume Right 0 0 - 32 0 0 60 50 0 0 bSH- - 1706-1700 1700 1413 1700-1700 -496 319 382 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.30 0.11 0.08 [Oueue Length (ft) 0 0 0 6 0 0 32- 9 6 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 15.4 17.7 15.2 Cane-LC G _ A C C C Approach Delay(s) 0.0 2.0 15.4 16.6 [Approacfi COS average 5.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.5% ICU Level of Service A • 2014 Buildout-PM Peak Synchro 5 Report HKM Engineering, Inc HKMENGBILl-ST51 APPENDIX SECTION THREE r :n E d N ' N Co CU o Y v " 30.0' a S ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ' .n N 4.5' 10.0' 10.0' 4.5' o - BLVD.. DRIVING DRIVING BLVD. LANE LANE a 0.5' 0.5' u a 3 \\//\\//\\//\\//\//\\//\�//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\// r L w 3 Lj �G� 21' PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD TYPICAL SECTION a 4, NOT TO SCALE A a v N 0 CI x NOTES: 1. THIS ROAD SECTION SHALL BE USED WITH MULTIFAMILY AREAS. 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL o BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 0 ca WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-1 TYPICAL SECTION 04<306:l.110 FEB. 210c,e 21' PRIVATE ROAD ENGINEERING � Y4t:`,'i'f--4h9idf:J:i 7YF t,Al_Fi.O'JJG Copyright 12004 HY,M Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. s N ' O_ N N co N d. 0 o 60.0 • N ,,,,._...._....... ...... .. .. ...... ... ...................._.._................................__...._......._................................._ ....... . .. ..____ PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 3.0' 7.0' 9.0' 9.0' 7.0' 3.0' .............f ...._.._.............� . .... �.........._........._..... PARKING DRIVING DRIVING PARKING - WA L LANE LANE ALK VI a 0.5' 0.5 c.� a r o Ld W ' 3 33' LOCAL STREET oc TYPICAL SECTION g_ ,x NOT TO SCALE a 0- i a 0 Y NOTES: 1. THIS ROAD SECTION SHALL BE USED IN SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS AND INTERNAL GRID SYSTEM. 0 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL i BY CITY. a• 0 CS WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY � � FIGURE 1-2 TYPICAL SECTION H o�sosr.114� FEB. zoos. 33' LOCAL STREET E N 6 1 N E E R I N G +hq_5'I'--WINDS--TYPICAI_Fi.OWC; Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. N N W N o ' Q 60.0' ._ .. ....... .... ...........................____._...................................................._................._......-.........._....... ....... ...... • a PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY N 2.0' 7.0' 10.0' 10.0' 7.0' 2.0' . ..............._................................................._.._............_........................ SI PARKING DRIVING DRIVING PARKING - WA LANE LANE LK 0.5' 0.5' J Q U a r t- 1n w i w ' D 35' LOCAL STREET a, TYPICAL SECTION a NOT TO SCALE A a- a •(U 0 NOTES: N 1. THIS ROAD SECTION SHALL BE USED ' IN SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS AND INTERNAL GRID SYSTEM. 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL BY CITY. v ° 0 CS WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-3 TYPICAL SECTION 04-S067.1jO-T FEB. 200-1 35' LOCAL STREET ENGINEERING Nri:S I'- VCIN[);� 1'YPlCAI_5.0WC; Copyright 0 2004 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. d Cy fV ` N O V N 90.0' o o PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY , � s>2 2.5' I• .0' 5.0' 11.0' 1 4I.0' 11.0' 5.0' 8.0 2.5' .......................... ........._............r............_.._►......._.............................f ........_........_...................._._...............,,.. —---_.--------_.._....----------------._ ......... ......................._._. SI PARKING BIKE DRIVING TURNING LANE/ DRIVING BIKE PARKING — WA 0 5' LANE RAISED MEDIAN LANE 0 5' LK J 0.5 0.5' d N H i N 3 27th STREET TYPICAL, SECTION - COLLECTOR STREET a NOT TO SCALE 0. a_ cu C) NOTES: H 1. WEST HALF OF N. 27th AVE. TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY WEST WINDS. a 2. EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER POLES - ,� TO BE WITHIN CENTER MEDIAN. 0 3. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL i BY CITY. 0 C7 WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-7 TYPICAL SECTION 04S087.1101 FEB. 2004 27th STREET ENGINEERING WE Si T...-WINDS.._T'YpIC.AI_`3.DWC: Copyright 0 2004 HIM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. N ' E f O_ (` N L N Co N O P N 100.0' Cu PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY Cu CD 1.0' 5.0' 8.0' 5.0' 11.0' 11.0' 5.0' 8.0' 5.0' 1.0' SIDE— PARKING BIKE DRIVING DRIVING BIKE PARKING SIDE- 7, WALK LANE LANE WALK J U 0.5 1.0' 0.5' 1- i Y/ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 BAXTER LANE Q TYPICAL SECTION - MINOR ARTERIAL A NOT TO SCALE a i Cu o Y NOTES: o 1. SOUTH HALF OF BAXTER LANE TO BE IMPROVED BY WEST WINDS 10 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL BY CITY. P 0 cs WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-6 TYPICAL SECTION *!E 04S067.110FEB. 2004 BAXTER LANE ENERING r,l: ,vlNri:;--r rNlcFt-s.ovdc Copyright 0 2004 HKINA Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. a r cL L N W N c 0 V 101 N •PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 1.0' 5. 18.0, 5.0' 11,0' 21.0' 11,0' 5.0' 8.0' 1 .0' 1.0' a SID - PARKING BIKE DRIVING TURNING LANE/ DRIVING BIKE PARKING E- ~ WAL LANE RAISED MEDIAN LANE TALK y J u 0,5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' a r ' r ti �F� DAVIS LANE Q TYPICAL SECTION - MINOR ARTERIAL ra NOT TO SCALE a NOTES: • m 1. EAST HALF OF FOWLER LANE � TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY N WEST WINDS. 0 2. SECTION LINE IRRIGATION DITCH TO BE WITHIN CENTER MEDIAN. 3. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW ti REMOVAL BY CITY. ------------------- 0 0 WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY FIGURE 1-5 TYPICAL SECTION H 04S087.11i) FEB, 2004 DAVIS LANE ENGINEERING rc t... Copyright 0 2004 HKtA Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. (V (V 03 N r:. o r 0 60' (HARVEST CREEK) 125.0 65' (WEST WINIPARKING c N PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY ! � iT u 3.0' 5. 8.0' t 2.0' 11.0' 24.0' 71.0' 12.0' 8.0' o cy SID PARKING/ DRIVING DRIVING TURNING LANE/ DRIVING DRIVING E— s WAL BIKE LANE LANE RAISED MEDIAN LANE LANE a ALK a 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' U a. r Z // /\//\//\//�\///�\/�\/\//\/\/\//\�\/\//\/\//\//\/\/\//\//\/\//\//\//\//\//\/\//\//\/\//\/\//\/\/�\�/�\�/\//%�/\�/\//\�/�//��/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��W OAK STREET ix TYPICAL SECTION - PRINCIPLE ARTERIAL a NOT TO SCALE Q CL a NOTES: • Cu 1. SOUTH HALF OF OAK STREET CONSTRUCTED C) BY HARVEST CREEK SUBDIVISION. Y 2. NORTH HALF OF OAK STREET TO BE r CONSTRUCTED BY WEST WINDS. o 3. EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER POLES TO BE WITHIN CENTER MEDIAN. a 4. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL N BY CITY. 0 C3 WEST• WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY _ �� FIGURE 1-4 TYPICAL SECTION H 04`_O,-,7.1 10 FEB. 2004 OAK STREET ENGINEERING NQi:`I'--N9P1fi;i T'YpICf\Ic;'i.t7WG Copyright 2004 HKM Engineering Inc_ All Rights Reserved. N N W N + . v a o 65.0' N PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 2.0' i 7.0' 5.0' 10.0' 10.0' 7.0' 2.0' 0 SKI PARKING BIKE DRIVING DRIVING PARKING, WA LANE LANE LANE ALK 0.5' (NORTH 0.5' a r �j �j �%��j��j ��j j \\\/\ j Li J Li D 40' LOCAL STREET TYPICAL SECTION CL q NOT TO SCALE CL a C o ' c? Y NOTES: 1, THIS ROAD SECTION SHALL BE USED o IN SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS F, AND INTERNAL GRID SYSTEM. o 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL i BY CITY. v 0 CS WEST WINDS PLANNED COMMUNITY - FIGURE 1-3.1 TSCHACHE LANE TYPICAL SECTION H 0"a0;i1.110 FEB. 2004 40' LOCAL STREET / BIKE TRAIL E N G I N E E R I N G Nrrrr--wrru, -,�FICAI_s.l�wc Copyright § 2004 HKM Engineering Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1 D c� Q. i �. X A P P PARK PLAN . N D I X • M West Winds Planned Community West Winds Park Plan a. Introduction The purpose of this Park Plan is to establish the design guidelines for West Winds Park. It is not intended to provide a fully detailed design of the facility rather provide the framework for the subsequent phased improvement of the Park. West Winds Park is a component of the West Winds Planned Community located within the Northwest 1/a of Section 2,Township 2 South,Range 5`East,PMM,Bozeman, Montana. The park is proposed to be a community park providing both passive and active recreational activities and a Neighborhood Community Center. The Park design has emphasized preservation of an abandoned irrigation ditch corridor (lateral Farmers Canal Ditch Company)that bisects the property south to north. Though man-made, over the years the h y- ditch lateral has fostered the growth of wetland species creating a jurisdictional wetland corridor through the property. This wetland corridor has intrinsic aesthetic and passive recreational value. The irrigation lateral runs down the center of West Winds Park that will serve to buffer the wetlands area from adjoining residential lots and West Winds Park Wetland Corridor roads. An extensive recreational trail system will parallel the wetland system allowing residents to view the flora and fauna associated with the wetlands. The trail system will connect the West Winds Park and the remainder of the West Winds Community to adjacent neighborhoods, commercial areas (Baxter Meadows), and regional parks (Rose Park and the 100-acre Regional Park). b.Park Elements West Winds Park is intended to serve/benefit a wide range people(young families through seniors) within the West Winds and surrounding neighborhoods with both active and passive recreational activities. This will be achieved by the preservation of a wetland corridor, trail installation, neighborhood community center, tot play equipment,picnic West Winds Planned Community West Winds Park Plan March 5, 2004 benches and designated youth soccer practice fields. The attached Park Plan (Figure M- 1)has identified specific uses for different areas within the Park. The specific park amenities include: ➢ Gross Area Park=21.18 Acres ➢ Area of Wetlands = 1.98 Acres ➢ Area of Storm water Detention Ponds=0.65 Acres ➢ Length of Trails=4,750 Feet ➢ Youth Practice Soccer Fields (1)U-13 (1)U-11 (3)U-9 (1)U-6/7 ➢ Public Restrooms ➢ Parking Lot ➢ Underground Irrigation System c. Ownership West Winds Park with the exception of the Neighborhood Community Center will be dedicated to the City of Bozeman for ownership and maintenance. This ownership • format is based on Section 18.50.070 of the BMC, which stated parks that provide recreation pathways should be dedicated to the City. The proposed trail system within West Winds Park is in compliance with the 20/20 Trail Map (Figure 9-120/20 Plan) providing both north/south and east/west trail connectivity. The Park will be dedicated to the City in phases in conjunction with phased subdivision plats of the project. d.Neighborhood Community Center The Neighborhood Community Center(NCC)is primarily for use by the residents of the West Winds Planned Community. The NCC will be owned and maintained by the West Winds Homeowners Association. The NCC will be sited on a separate tract of land from West Winds Park. The NCC will be designated as private common open space. e.Youth Practice Soccer Fields The Park Plan (Figure M-1)designates youth practice soccer field locations. These fields are intended for practice purposes only and will not be for scheduled league play. No soccer specific improvements beyond grading, seeding and irrigation are proposed within the park. The intent is to identify practice locations for local youth teams and provide notice to future adjoining residential lots that youth soccer practice may use the park areas. Page M-7 West Winds Planned Community West Winds Park Plan March 5, 2004 - • f.Public Restro m 0 A public restroom facility is proposed adjacent to the NCC and parking lot area. The public restrooms are intended for general public use and will be sited on dedicated park property. The public restrooms will be owned and maintained by the City. g.Parking Lot A parking lot area is proposed adjacent to the NCC. The parking is intended as shared use for both the NCC, youth practice soccer fields and walking trail users. The parking lot shall be on the NCC tract and maintained by the Homeowners association. h.Park Improvements The subdivider of any specific phase of the West Winds Planned Community shall be responsible for improving his or her specific park area(See PUD Figure 2.4—Phasing Diagram). The improvements shall include leveling any park areas, amending the soil, seeding disturbed areas to allow mowing with turf type mowers,installing trail system, installing any ancillary items (penches,play equipment, ect..) and installing an underground irrigation system in compliance with City standards and specifications. The park shall be seeded with a drought tolerant grass seed. • The subdivider shall be responsible for irrigating the park area for 1 full irrigation season after the specific subdivision phase final plat is filed and park improvements installed, after which time the City will maintain and irrigate the publicly dedicated portions of the park. The Homeowners Association shall irrigate the NCC tract. Wells will be used to irrigate the park area. Figure M-1 provides a well locations and 4" irrigation distribution main locations. West Winds will be responsible for water right applications and will transfer the waters to the City upon receipt. i. Trails West Winds Park has been designed in compliance with the 20/20 Trail Map (See Figure 6.6) and provides trail connectivity to the adjoining neighborhoods and regional parks. Trails within West Winds Park shall be constructed to a Class II Standard. The trail crossings of Breeze,Tschache and Trade Wind Lanes shall have delineated street crossings to enhance pedestrian safety. The sub-divider shall be responsible for the construction of the trails. The trail system shall be a phased constructed based on the phased subdivision build-out of the West Winds Community. Page M-7 • 0 West Winds Planned Community West Winds Park Plan • March 5, 2004 ' j.UDO Compliance The following is an item-by-item of Section 18-50 of the UDO to address compliance with the UDO. 18.50.020 Park Requirements A) Land will be will dedicated to the City for Park Area. Basis for park area requirements shall based on the combined areas of items 1 and 2 below. 1) .03-acres per dwelling unit will be dedicated for areas with known density (single-family and townhouses). 2) 11% of net area of multi-family parcels will be dedicated to the City for Park Area. B) NA 18.50.030 Cash Donation In-lieu of Land Dedication—NA 18.50.040 Park Use—See Figure M-1 of the plan 18.50.050 Location—The developer has meet with the Park board in designing this plan. The plan addresses pre-application comments from the DRC,DRB and Commission. • 18.50.060 Frontage—West Winds Park has approximately 70% public road frontage. 18.50.070 Linear Parks A) General. West winds Park is consistent with 20/20 Trail Plan. 1) The water features within the park are irrigation laterals not water courses. Therefore, the trails are not in setbacks and will be dedicated to the City as Parkland. B) Width. West Winds Parks is on average 450 feet wide. C) Maintenance. The City will maintain dedicated areas. 18.50.080 Park Development A) General. See Section i.Parl Improvements above. B) Boundaries. Park boundaries will be delineated per the requirements of this section. C) Sidewalks. City standard sidewalks will be constructed at trail interfaces with streets. D) Storm Water Detention Ponds. Storm water detention ponds within park land will not be credit to park area requirements. E) Clean Up Removal. Construction debris will be removed from park area upon • completion of each phase of the project. Page M-7 West Winds Planned Community West Winds Park Plan • March 5, 2004 18.50.090 Waiver of Park Maintenance District—If required, the developer will file said waiver. 18.50.100 Waiver of Park Dedication—NA 18.50.110 Recreational Pathways A) General. The proposed trail system within West Winds Park is in conformance with the 20/20.Trail Plan. B) Pathway Categories. Based on adjoining pathway improvements, the trails within West Winds Park shall be Class H. C) Related Facilities. Trail bridges will be designed by a Professional Engineer per the requirements of this section. D) Pathway Maintenance—Trails will be maintained by the City. E) Pathway Easements—Easements will be provided as required. Page M -7 do So. cl-. r tk I 34 L L——————— BAXTER LANE (MINOR ARTERIAL) 10, --� — — lI l 17 n 7"k17, ml'� 4V --UFFWT—-—- Ll--L-J— -1--J Let�i L -TTTT� r T-4-j— +—I . . . . cc E3 cc /7 ------ --,F j : --7 E N L ' PIN 1 N/A 1 =/� I P L F EFEM ------ ------ -4.4 I L A. --------------- ......------- ------- ---- - - -------- 4----------- -------------OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL)------------------------ --------------------------- �6 --f--- -------------------777 - i --- I :7 A ------- .......... CBNT R OF S. 2 SE L., S 11—— " 1 ! . . LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNITY PROPOSED ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED TRAX SYSTEM NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.8., R.5-E., P.M.M. -------------- PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT UNE GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA 1"ll ING PROPOSED ROAD CENTERUNE —N— PROPOSED OPEN SPACE 0*08&4 bm PROPOSED PARKS PROJECT PHA SING I McChesr"Professlord Bldg. EASTRic MLANDS 601 NWw Dr.Suite 2 DIA GRA M BommomMT5?715 (0)5S&M 200 0 200 FIGURE 2.4 FAX 14M)5S&1730 ROJELr NO.04SO87.110 DATE: DECEMBER 3$,20M P Ccp)dght 0 2003 HIGA EnOomano ln0.AN Rlshts Roowvo4 a a N • ■ CA7TAN so O � • r l i a a h WES T WINDS COMMUNI T Y SEEM IN I • N TSLA! l � � fn AN7 Z a ax � t y � a a m OA � IN L W 9A N _ Uyl ST VA A ro , y LEGEND WES T WINDS COMMUNI T Y ------mil-- PROPOSED KSTWHOS TRNL SYSTEI/ NW 114 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.S.E., P.M.M. H� J DISTIN0 MJOININO VIA&SYM GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA lNOIN!llINO � r v HKM -N- EngineeringInc. McChesney Professional Bldg. NR� . REGIONAL TRAIL PL A N 601 Was Dr.,Suffe 2 /V Rrya,°!°°FYann PROPOSED 2020 a Bozeman,ML59715 TRAIL PLAN n IV R(°°,-G°MUnaYR°paM G,Cpre°. (0)586-M "'. °"•�`°°` foo0 D l000 FIGURE 6.7 FAX(406(586-1730 i Kale foot DAIS: FTH,27,2004 PROJECT NO.045087.1f0 6 Cop^ht 9 2004 NKM Englnewing Ina.AU Rights Retwwd. • ���� t f �r. ,I �'� PARK PLAN r Tr ,, 0. LM---4m:.. .-._........ JI ic_Z r AXEANe (MINOR ARTERIAL) --------------- 2 _7---------- _4 bkI --------- 7-f ----- ----�LANE L _j molvlsiow 77' .... .. ---- 77-7 R LJ L IF-TT -4 F 7 71 -. A:, .4 0 HE LQ GENERAL NOTES: 1. WEST WINDS PARK SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. F_T_ I THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SHALL BE ON A SEPARATE PARCEL OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS I---ASSOCIATION. 3 PUBLIC RESTROOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY. 4' SOCCER FIELDS SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC PURPOSES ONLY. 1 ' a I N ACTUAL POSITION OF PRACTICE FIELDS WILL VARY. 5. SEE PUD PHASING PLAN FOR PHASING OF PARK "Al I IMPROVEMENTS. DETENTION WETLAND CLASS 11 T. POND TRAIL 4. 2' MAX. WATER DEPTH IL 5 BOTTOM AND SIDES ARTERIAL) ------------------ ----------------------------------------- OF DETENTION POND TO BE LAWN WITH SECTION A:A IRRIGATION SYSTEM (A 3 1 i I I , -�= ': Alex NOT TO SCALE ENTER OF S. 2 1. DETENTION PONDS SHALL BE DRY PONDS 7 IffW PO.SfnW DRAINAGE. LEGEND I WEST WINDS COMMUNITY 4. NW 114 SECTION 2, T.2.S., R.S.E., P.M.M. IRRIGATED ACTIVE RECREATION AREA QW PAMVE RECREATION AREAS,NAMAL GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA .......... CONDITION,UN-IRRIGATED -N- STCRIJ WATER OETENTION FAaUTY 'A Englneedng Inc. 8BENCH PARK PLAN cChemeyftfessfonal Bldg. PROXM TRAL SYSTEIJ WEST WINDS PARK 601 NlIdes or.,Sulte 2 • NacHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CENTER (406)M&M PEDESTRIAN TRAIL CROMC 200 O 200 FIGURE M-I FAX(406)586-1730 DATE FEB.19,2004 PROJECT NO.04SO67.110 Copyight 0 2004 NO EngInwIng tm,AU Rights Rs.. d. �® Q. X NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PLAN Neighborhood Center Plan For West Winds Planned Community Prepared For: Quest West LLC 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman,MT 59718 • Prepared By: E KM Engineering Inc. 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 March 2004 04S067.110 West Winds Planned Community —Neighborhood Center Plan March 5,2004 • Table of Contents Page Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 1 ProjectOverview............................................................................................................................ 1 Basisof Design............................................................................................................................... 1 NeighborhoodCenter Building....................................................................................................... 1 NeighborhoodCenter Parking........................................................................................................ 1 TransitStop..................................................................................................................................... 5 NeighborhoodCenter Property....................................................................................................... 5 Maintenance....................................................................................................................................5 UDOCompliance............................................................................................................................ 5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Figures Figure NC-1 -Neighborhood Center Concept Plan........................................................................2 Figure1.2 -Master Plan................................................................................................................... 3 • Figure 3.1 —Parcelization Map.......................................................................................................4 Page i 9 NO IN E RING West Winds Planned Community —Neighborhood Center Plan • March 5,2004 Purpose • This Neighborhood Center Plan is prepared for the West Winds Planned Community per the g P P Y requirements of Section 18.42.020 of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. PrOiect Overview The West Winds Planned Community is a 161.3-acre (Gross)mixed use residential development located in the northwest 1/a, Section 2,Township 2 South,Range 5 East, bordered by Oak Street on the south, North 27a'Avenue on the east,Baxter Lane on the north, and Davis Lane on the west. The proposed Neighborhood Center is located at the center of the project at the intersection of Buckrake Avenue and Tschache Lane. The Center has been integrated into West Winds Park which is a 21.14-acre (Gross)linear park bisecting the project (see Figure 1.2— Master Plan) Basis of Design The basis for design of the Neighborhood Center is as set forth in Section 18.42.020 of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The intent of the design is to create a central gathering place for all residents of the community. Typical activities at the center will include enjoying a neighborhood barbecue, a game of volleyball or host a neighborhood meeting. The Center could also be made available for casual events such as wedding receptions, and neighborhood meetings. The Center has been sited in the middle of West Winds Park to • maximize utilization of the park and trail system. Neighborhood Center Building The Center building is anticipated to be a 4,000 SF to 6,500 SF conventional wood frame structure. The programming of the Center is anticipated to include: ➢ Kitchen Facilities ➢ Game Room Tits. ➢ Rest Rooms (Non- Public, no exterior access) ➢ Meeting Room Neighborhood Center Parkin A parking lot that will serve both the Center and West Winds Park is proposed to be constructed adjacent to the Center. The parking lot will be located on the Centers parcel and is anticipated to have 30— 50 parking stalls. Example Neighborhood Center, Portland Oregon Page 1 of 5 ENGINEERING N.C. PLAN 4 1 t 1 4 1 , I i I 1 ------------- 1 � 1 WEST N7NOS S — — PARK \�+ ' � I I �--—--— �---—-•—----- 1 1 ' — _— I ' ► I r i � \` \ \\ op \ \ I 1 I I I 000 �/ 5'BIKE LANE l I T\ It WEST WINDS -Y: ' `�7.` PARK �\ ` PUBLIC RESTROOM \�' // '� \�\ ✓% �/ IMAINTAINED BY CITY! Nis. I I COMMON AREA TOT-PLAY ' TRACT 15D Ac. AREA100, / r ''LANDSCAPE ` / AREA BRIDGE I � `1� ',•�.r� ,�/ `COVERED PICNIC TABLES E H C CENTERNTER/TRANSIT STOP '—"— ------•---1--- \ \ / NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER i ;I ' PARCEL (COMMON AREA) d � 1 41 \ i i WEST WINDS ^ i PARK, 4 LEGEND WES T WINDS COMMUNI T Y ------- PROPOSED ROAD RIGHT OF WAY NW 1/4 SECT/ON 2,PRCPOSED TRAL SYM T.2.S., R.5.E., P.M.M. -------------- REmEr P LOT GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA 11,101NIVaiNG ASpiggss ----- PROPOSED ROAD CENTERLINE _N_ HKM Engineering Inc. DQSTWG PETLANOS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER McChesney Su ess<ortial Bldg. CONCEPT PL A N p 60^1 NI'Ides Dr„Suite 2 h Wze n W S975 BUILDINGS AND PFIVATE ROADS-MHIN 1NL➢—FAIIILY (406(586aU AREAS INTENDED FOR CONCEPT/iLLUSTRAME PURPOSES FIGURE NC-1 406 586-tI30 ONLY. SITE SPEO7TC PLANS FOR EACH AREA WLL BE 0 So FAX ( I PRov1DED TO an AT sTE PLAN RENEW. .cal. (.st DATE: FEB.28,2004 PROJECT NO.04SC67.110 d Cwight 0 2004 HI01 Engin.wing Ina,All Rights RssstYK. NOTE 1 - MU I I THE INTERNAL ROAD TRUCTJRE CONFIGURATIONS I I pArT ER I IN THE MOLT+-FAMILY ND SENIORS ARE PRONGED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PU POSES ONLY. SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLANS LL BE PROVIDED THROUGH r F tls "'•%l j W I I I I THE SITE PLAN PROCESS.LOT 6 .i -CirAB" I I P,iaifirr.'PE:Err".Su"rV I 'G �•�G ,}.'� ` ny rr I Fi•'iL::Lai^r? c-Tw nc_r.J¢ _L- L ?i.��i•%{.a?Ei� �Lx� i I��fo _ - - I �JJ.1J.aLSSu. _ 34 35 BAXTER LANE (MINOR ARTERIAL) 3 —_ — 2— I- - - - - - - - - - - — }- - - --------- 3 --------- ----i I r - - I r -- - "ram T-r7- 71-- j 1-r- '— l.J._LJ_J av � I rl'T"1-1-T1"� I I I I I L__ -L_J_1L I__� ASF£f�F6116dE -BTRI�TT------� 1 ------ -I -- �1"T"l—f"T"T�,yn�f—I" 7-r- ,� J I I n.a.tirrrr I I�_ prra�.�u.•c I �---� I T-+-I—I•-+-T� I—f-+-t��-y' I — i I I I I I I 1 r9�rh75iDdr I 1 LJ_J —--—-— - ►+AE►+E6ANE 777 T i r - s Mf/ \;�i NaTE 1 ��) 141 :r I\ I �— J I ' I 1 1 :1 1 1 ( , `IV-' / Gt I __J I l F----+ 1 , I • V If • C 11___--y__J __� ! i----y �a I I I? I-T__ Q 1 1 SEE NOTE 1 S13 i I ! 1oa a AI�--- `4 I I I L 1 tr r�i �, �--r- J i � I I IIIII I - rrrrs�rr�rr.r r rr=rr.rrrrr�r - --------�-------------------- - OAK STREET !PR/NC/PAL ARTER/ALIT --------------------- -------� ---•--- -----_----- -------_ =-1'1 1 - -- j ------- r:.ST - rti r:;i: I 1 I I !iiir3f.°li%Lriliid 'iLa:i: f . with I u"i:TTi .aivivf^ I I Ei.?%ii:ri%r:SiOli _ I I I I I P ;i. 1 I I.,,r•:.. ' '%tL.,: I I I CeNTBR OF S. 2 LEGEND WEST WINDS COMMUNI T Y PROPOSED ROAD RIQHT OF WAY PROPOSED TRAIL SWU NW 1/4 SECT/ON 2, T.2.S., R.S.E., P.M.M. —--— -------------- PROPOSED EASEMENT GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA e -•------ PROPOSED LOT UNE s �NOINtIIINO ------ PROPOSED ROAD CENTENUNE _N- ^^�'P Al PROPOSED OPEN SPACE HKM Engineedllg Inc. U�-- PROPOSED PARKS MASTER PL A N McChesney Professional Bldg. E10sTwc%1LANDs 601 Was Dr.,Sulfe 2 Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)58&M 200 0 200 FIGURE 1.2 FAX(406)586-1730 iiigil wmb fwt DATE FEB.27,2004 PRO,ECT NO.06067.110 Cvydght 0 20D4 NO Englnowing Inc.,A0 A.ghb Rownd. 0 West Winds Planned Community —Neighborhood Center Plan March 5,2004 • Transit Stop A transit stop is proposed to be included in the Centers configuration. The intent is to provide a central transit stop to the West Winds Community at the Center. Users of future mass transit services could stay warm and dry within the Center while waiting for bus service. Neighborhood Center Property The Neighborhood Center and parking will be sited on a separate parcel from West Winds Park (See Figure 3.1 —Parcelization). The parcel shall be denoted on the plat as common area. The purpose of a separate parcel is to clearly define ownership and maintenance responsibilities between the Center and the publicly dedicated West Winds Park. Maintenance The Neighborhood Center and parking shall be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association. UDO Compliance The following is an item-by-item review of Section 18.42.020 of the UDO. A. The Neighborhood Center is located within 320 feet of the geographic center of the • development. B. The developer will construct the West Winds Neighborhood Center. The construction of the Center will be based on the West Winds phasing plan (See Figure 2.4—Project Phasing Diagram of the PUD application). C. The Center has full street frontage to the east and north and is bounded to the west and south by publicly dedicated parkland. D. The Center will be a separate parcel denoted on the face of the plat as "Common Area". The Center will be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association. E. The entire Neighborhood Center parcel (less storm detention area) has been credited towards parkland credit. F. A portion of the Neighborhood Center parcel has a storm detention pond. The storm detention pond area is not credited towards parkland credit. Conclusion This plan establishes the general programming, ownership and maintenance requirements for the proposed West winds Neighborhood Center. The Center has been planned in compliance with the pertinent sections of the UDO. Page 5 of 5 FN61NEEtIN� -a 1 ' 1 �' + I F X111 O i I � a EXISTING EASEMENTS ISSUED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNERS POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Commonwealth POLICY NUMBER A LANDAM17tIG GOMPANI' A60- 0400028. SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE,THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINE&IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS,COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,a Pennsylvania corporation,herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of.: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title,as insured,but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereufiir0 affixed by its duly authorized officers,the Policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: Arrest: Qiti-�-/ �i✓ Secretary President lip • EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs,attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: I. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting, regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improYe- ment now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the affect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regula- tions, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Daie of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:. (a)created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b)the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer • results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. NM 1 PA10 ALTA Owner's Policy(10/17/92) Face Page Valid Only If Schedules A and B and Cover Are Attached C.,r... i1onL71R wr+.e:Gere> s+nc�v OWNER'S SCHEDULE A • Office File Policy Number Date of Policy Amount of Premium Number Insurance 1-72048 A60-0400028 April 3, 2003 $5,100,000.00 $9,606.50 at 3:OOPM 1. Name of Insured: Quest West, LLC 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is: fee simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: Quest West, LLC • 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: NW'/a.of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East,P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. [Deed Reference: Film 174,page 751] (Authorized Signature) SCHEDULE A ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE • SCHEDULE B File No.: 1-72048 Policy No.: A60-0400028 This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses)which arise by reason of: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate.survey.and inspection of the prernises including,but not limited to,insufficient or impaired access and'matters contradictory to any survey plat shown by the public records. 3. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to lien, for services,labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. (a)Unpatented mining claims;(b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance hereof;,(c)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a), (b),or(c) are shown by the public records. • 6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Except all minerals in or under said land including,but not limited to, metals, oil, gas, coal, stone and mineral rights, mining rights and easement rights or other matters relating thereto,whether expressed or implied. 2. Taxes for the year 2003 and subsequent years. Taxes for the year 2002 are paid. Taxes ` for the year 2003 are a lien not yet due or payable: Included within the General Taxes are Gallatin Conservation District and Planning District. 3. Right of Way for, or any portion falling within creeks, streams, canals, ditches, roads, including but not limited to Harmon Ditch,Baxter Road, Oak Street, Fowler and 27`h Avenue running across the above described property. V 4. Right of Way Easement to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co., recorded December 14, 1929, in Book_,page 29, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 5. Right of Way Easement to The Montana Power Company, recorded September 6, 1950 in Book 103 of Deeds, page 75, records of Gallatin County, Montana. • (continued) SCHEDULE B(Standard Coverage) ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) CONTINUATION PAGE SCHEDULE B • File No.: 1-72048 Policy No.: A60-0400028 6. Overhead Electric Right of Way Easement to The Montana Power Company,;recorded March 19, 1991 in Film 115,page 706,records of Gallatin County,Montana. 7. Public Street Easement to The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana,recorded December 4, 1997 in Film 179,page 2079, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 8. Public Street Easement to The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana,recorded December 4, 1997 in Film 179, page 2083,records of Gallatin County, Montana. ' t/9. Public Street Easement to The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana,recorded December 4, 1997 in Film 179,page 2087, records of Gallatin County, Montana. ,/.10. Public Street Easement to The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana, recorded December 4, 1997 in Film 179, page 2091, records of Gallatin County, Montana. • V1 l. Easement and Right of Way Agreement for Sewer Trunk between Thomas & Robert Lane, a party of the first part, and The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana, party of the second part, dated August 13, 1980 and recorded September 4, 1980 at 8:25 A.M., in Film 58,page'331, as Document No. 77342. ✓12. Water and Sewer Pipeline Access Easement and Agreement between Robert D. Lane, Thomas E. Lane, and XL Limited Partnership, parties of the first part and City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana,party of the second part, dated October.18, 1996 and recorded January 3, 1997 at 12:06 P.M., in Film 169, page 3778, as Document No. 337323. 13. Annexation Agreement dated December 1, 1997 and recorded December 4, 1997 at 2:20 P.M., in Film 179,page 2063, as Document No. 355373. 14. Commission Resolution No. 3216 dated December 1, 1997 and recorded December 4, 1997 at 2:21 P.M., in Film 179,page 2076, as Document No. 355374. (continued) SCHEDULE B(Standard'Coverage) ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) CONTINUATION PAGE SCHEDULE B File No.: 1-72048 Policy No.: A60-0400028 15. Mortgage from Quest West, LLC,to Rocky Mountain Bank-Bozeman, in the amount of $3,570,000.00, dated April 3, 2003 and recorded April 3, 2003 at 3:OOPM, as Document No. 2103189. CBW/ad END OF SCHEDULE B SCHEDULE B(Standard Coverage) ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) .70 G` INDiVIDUA-L :'. OVUKHEAD::ELECTRIC • RiGHT-O'FAVAY CASEMENT 4, ' LANE, Livingston, W.'and ROBERT D. LANE, Three Forks; Montana-tin consider- E r atioriof:S1.0(1 anil other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby ac- k'riowledged,.do'hcrcby grant and convey to THE MONTANA POWER CONIPANY,•a lviontana.corporation, s. : of 40`East:l3roadway, Butte, MT 59701-9989,and to its successors and assigns,arreasetnent of varying widths. � : ,:;.upon which to'construct,operate, maintain,replace and remove an electric powerline,communication system and''nccessary.appurtenances over, under, alone and across that certain real property locatcd::in Gallatin it r{„ otinty;:Oontana,and particularly described as lollows: ; ..TOWNSHIP_SOUTH, itANGE 5 EAST, P.M.M. Y ?'' "SECTION 2: portion of the NWV. being more particularly described as follows: .Beginning.at the West one-quarter corner of said Section '_'• thence, FIRST COURSE,. KID 1°'14'57-E., 28.0 feet on the West boundary of said Section; 'Thence, SECOND COURSE, S'.89°40."04'E., 4.6 feet; Thence, THIRD COURSE, N.li9°18'O1"G., 2601.5 feet; Thence, r Kj. -T(YURTHt000RSE N.01211'24".E., 1346.1 feet' Thence FIFTH COURSE N.01°39'24"13. 358'.I .feet; 'Thence, SIXTH COURSE, N.01 10'36'r., 928•S -loot to a point on the North =' boundary of said Section;'Thence,SEVENTH COURSE,N.89`23'17"E.,23:7 feet on said North 'boundary to the North onc-quartcr corncr of said Sccdon; Thence, EIGHTH COURSE, - - � S:i)1 I1'42"1V., 1325.5 feet on the\orth-loath mid-section line to the East one-sixteenth corner of the NWV. of said Section; Thence, NINTH-COURSE, S•01'22'30"W., 1335.2 feet on said North-South mid=section lins to the center onc-quartcr corncr of said Section:Thence,TENTH rc'l.r`o. - ' COURSE S S9"18'01.'W., 2640.9 feet oit the East-Vest mid-scction-linc of.said'Section-to the-..-_- --'--- - -- " J 6 West onc-quarter section corncr and the point of be-innir.p, and containing in all 3.6 acres, more or less, t;ETHER with reasonable right of ingress to and egress loom said right of way over lands of the Grantors *_ :.`:::acing existing roads and trails where practicable, and the right to clear and remove all timber and brush from t the right-cf way and to cut and remove such uecs outside of etch rieht of=tvay which may endanscr said line or'lincs. ' .':.'Tl-lE GR,wrORS(Ia hereby co`:enant with t;i:-(grantee that they-m;kwdltdly seized and possessed of the real • ( .'estate abo:c•dcscriLcd, that they have a good ;iw.l lawrul right to conv-cy it, or any part thereof. DATED this f day of , f"-; _ 1991. ^!;j?., '�7,Y,rr�•. (G �1 GZ,LLB' �' .t��.T 'A.(/ HOA1AS E. LANE '' ROB CRT D. LANE • S TAT E.0'r NIONTAi`NA )Ss. r 'COUNti, OF GAL LATIN a: °= On:;this ..day of 7�1•s'At-11l t':!!al before Lire undcr:;igned Notary Public for the State of Montana, n6rson511v appcarcd'1'l10\4AS Li. LANEAND kOB!ilt'T 1). LANE,known to me to be the per- ' rl'"`sons``whosc:a3inrc'.{Ire ;uhsc:ribc� lt> the witl::r instrument and ac}:r.naledged to me that they executed the ...,,�..r . ±t Fi5'OF, I have hereunto set my haul;�nJ ;IfliscJ my Notarial Sea]the day and year in sn :•thls�, cc=fiist�atLji*e written. rb�t' 3 Notary Public for the State i6( JY{Un t�;,nw Residing:it �bZeln->zc�_ rt�n 22dg.73,:. f° M Contmissiori�Expires 6 - =' rd this 1.9thday of March 1991,at 11 42 o'clock A .1L.,and recordcd:in Book on ['age of the records of Count of Gallatin 'State of•Montana. 14S Y , CI-f:RK AND 10ECORDE ; Fee: $S.00. . �t .lack Rabbit-Bast Gallatin Sc mcnt RETURIV TO: 4 Secur=i:ty: Title ;:; Innis-Iloz6" n 161<kV THIE MONTANA'POWER COM['ANY•.NO.: a1,0.12=C(47) W:O:NO.• 19-17414-8;2 REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT' , NO.: 2 40'East Broadway ; ACQ01 RL D;IIY:1.oc Sabol Butte, M"!' 59701-9989. ._ ..:.z:.0i�.1•�...:.r:..C:e......,: +r78.rs.irt.nw�rw� ' ' . , . �..-�bsro+�rr_e'w►xsaz�+c,����a�r�+.�uetaeastioasrm.. .. .., ._., Water and Sever PIPELINE AND ACCESS EASEl1E\'f AND AGREEMENT Robert D. Lane and Thomas E. Laac, XL Limited Partnership, of the State of Montana, the GRANTOR(S), in consideration of One Dollar(S_I.Cr ) and other goods and valuable consideration, receipt of which is ac:nowledged, grant(s) to the City of Bozeman; a municipal corporation of the State of Montana,.=!I East;\'rain,P.ozeman,NIT 69771-0640;GRANTEE,its successors and assigns,a perpetual casement to lay,construct and maintain a sewer pipeline with the usual services,valves,connections,accessories and appin Lenances for the purpose of transmitting I sewage in,through,and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County,Montana,to be located on the fo!lowir,g described real property: SE'A of the NW!4,Section 2,T2S,R5E,P.\9.!•I., Gallatin County,..__... ._... _.t..._..._....__._..._...... Aklontana. The easement i;more nm.rticularl.::!:<_.ribed on th art:ic::;r.i ;::Itit�it(s)A,which by this reference are mad_apart hereof. This grant ir;cfudes the ri-lit of the;lt:'�NTEE,is success;r . �emtittees,licensees,and assigns and its and their ag_nts and employees, to enter at all timcs u on the above described land by using existing roads or trails or otherwise nv a route causing the least damage and inconvenience to the 'j GRANTOR(S) in order to survey and establish the route and location of the easement and the pipeline and to: (I) Constnrct,operaic,patrol,rcl :ir,substitute,rcniov:.enlarge,replace,and maintain the pipeline,se-vices,Conrn:cti ims,accessories anti appurtenances; (2) Trim.,remove,destroy,or otherwise control any trues and brush inside or outside the boundaries of the easemer ,, ,Which ntay, in the upinion ol'the GRANTEE,interfere or threaten to interfere with or be hazardous to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the pipeline; ' I .:J. ' _ .. .-' .. '°' ......�.....�a......vn./mwi.�.n'.rtwsvwrraysn!�[�ttLlaE➢1�u'q.`'itM3ZT - ON ION! (3) Grade the land subject to this eassnient and extend the cuts and fills of this grading into and on the land adjacent to that which is subject to this easement to the extent • Pr GRANTEE may find reasonably necessary;and (4) Support the pipeline across ravines and water courses with structures..-,which 1-: GRANTEE deems necessary. The GRANTEE agrees that: (1) That, in connection with the construction, operming, patrolling, repairing, substituting, removing,enlarging, replacing,and maintaining of said sewer pipeline, y, it will repair or replace,at its sole expense,or pay to'GRANTOR(S)the reasonable value of any damages to growing crops, existing fences, ditches and other appurtenances of said'land that may be disturbed by its operation; c. (2) That, Owing open Lions involving excavation; it will r.nnove the topsoil from the trenched area to a depth of one foot,or to the lull depth of the topsoil,whichever is less,and stockpile said topsoil for replacement crier the trench. It will remove from • the Site a:;!Iarn('roC1:S or St!!'I?Il!;e>:C3vating tt?alCn:!i or any debris that may have been exposed by the cxcavaG,n aWd remains alter,�rlci:!i!ii❑g is completed. And,it will leave the tIt11511ed Surface III Substan!iaily the sar!w-'o dition as existed prior to the beginning of operations except that the surface lit hack-filled areas may be mounded sufficiently to preJcra th'to;station ol'dcpre„ions after final settlement has taken place. Y (3) To lay, construct and maintain said.pipeline in such manner as will not hinder or __..�.__._.-.__. ._...._P_revent the proper cultiy�tion ol'.the._tract,to which.this right-of way.is hereby. granted. The GRANTOR(S)agree that: �1} At no time will they build,consinlct,erector maintain any ncrmanent structure within the boundaries of said easement whhout the prior r wit!cn cument of the GRANTEE. :r J• . i i KM S91 FAU3780 � • (2) At no time will they modify the finished grade of the land over the pipeline by removal of existing soil or by placement of till material within the boundaries of said easement without t,%e orior written consent of the GRANTEE. (3) The GRANTOR(S)warrant that they are lawfully seized and possessed.-of the real property described above,that they have a lawful right to convey the property,or any part of it,and that they will forever defend the title to this property against-the claims vh' tT of all persons. Y:. J-` 4 The GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and privileges,herein ranted r. ( ) YP JY & P � 8 8 without.any interruption bv.the.GR-kNTOR(S)... . .-------... -.--__-.--....---..__..-.._..._. .. ..._._ ._... -.---.-.--..... The terms,covenants and provisions of this easement;ind.agreement shall extend to and be binding' upon the heirs, executors, administrators, personal represa;iatives, successors and assigns of the pitrties hereto. • ti DATED this !C day of e , 199Z . ;Thomas E, Lane STATE OF M.ONTANA ) County of part: ) On this / tiny of O/, 1996,bel-ore me, Notary Public in and.for the State * or Montana, personally appeared known to me to be the person whose ,:. na.,Iq is_subscribed,to in the above.instrument and who acknowled ged to me that he executed the same, In.witness.wlidreof, I have hereunto set my hand and aIlixed my official seal the day and year first ^`r :ab lreimr4ten 01 � otii ic.. the State of MT y..� . ci xpires S:! »�P s� fj: r ..9 3 - � s�bC?lamL°dR�T�R77�^"._•ms:�7�L7Yacrm-...u[.raWaas.a.,�s wsvr..so+. �......�..�,...�-�.�,�.. ; ::s•:•. • 1w FILM IG9 RU3`81 DATED this_Le_day of t% 1996. { Mary An Lane STATE OF IMONTANA ) ss ,t County of Park ) On this / day of d�,71 , 1996,before me,a Notary Public in:and for the State t- a i of Montana, personally appearedr '�, �Cjr, ._ , known to me to be-the person whose i - name is subscribed to in the above instrument, and who,acknowledged to me that he executed the ' same, r,. I 4' '- l i ones yerc of I hive hereunto set,n hand and atfix,:d rny official.eal the day.and year first-- ' .. i }A' ica r the Stats of MT Eomrw v i Expires .; DATED this`�_day o1'� c L�>` .._.._...__..• 1'»ti i Robert D. Lane STATE OF MOWANA ) ss County of Gallatin► ) ':. On this /.: _day of 1996,be►i:rc niz.%a Notary Public in and for the State of'Montana, personally appeared / • " . ��=� , known to me to be the person whose w� v# name is subscribed to in the above instrument,and who acknowledged to me that he executed the have hereunto set my hand and af. ��. my official seal the dny and year first c: r.6 P State of VIT.•� : .. Vellh Cotttiilisµ :Expires r�.t01 . :IF 4 , J: • DATED this� day of r-�;../,t, ;99;•• fr!w 11;9Pl1"G, 7gk -i. Carol Ann Lane STATE OF NION[TANA ) ss County of Gallatin ) ` Cin this /j _day of t _, 1996,before me,a iNotary Public in-.and for the State N. of Montana ,'personally appeared .tic•�:,� .�.•.� knran tome to be the person whose a R- name is subscribed to in the above instrutnent,and who acknowledged to me that he executed the same. �s In witness:whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first { tI State ofMT tci�;•Expires / �y;�% ACCEPTED.' 1 CI'Vy OP t30'Z�ENIAN • Civ Its t ,ia agct YA AT -ST: , '. E lerk ol'the Cit. v Commission STATE OF AdONTANA ) ss =) County of Gallatin ) On this day of. 'V 1996,before me,a Notary Public in and for the State „r of Montana,personally appeared James E.Wysocki and Robin L.Sullivan,known to me to be the City svfanagcr and Clerk of the City Commission known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to in(he foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same, -: In witness whereof,t have.hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and mar first written' : bove, I:ioexc-0 fate of NY,n ` 2 3 rtgr Eo ounrjof l ailadn Phi JANUARY 31997 1`otary'Pu5hcfor the State of RTT t,1w at 12:06 P M.,and :+ Residing at ���yl n �mn1 '•'� ,'. .. ncc:�rded In book 169 of My Commission xp res �� .r,. �. MISCELLANEOUS Page 3778 r', . 9iwYO • r- RT. CITY COUNTY PLANNING t.'l�`t:;o '.lT; O, ioe,,ryryClalk&Rece;W4 Daputy elli, 5 v fvr S 30.00Pn • err; f It'd �'�9�i�A 4�➢ � dy+./��p� --T 3MET E.a �1 y Y _]CL 'Limited P-artnership. GRANTOR,in consider ,ion of S 1.00 and for other and valuable <. considerations, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants to The Citesof Bozgma , a municipal V;:. ' corporation of the State of Montana,with offices at 411 East Nfain,Bozeman,Montana 59771=0640, f`` GRANTEE,a perpetual street and utility'casement f'or the use of the public,in,through,and.across cx <•; a strip of lard situated in Gallatin County,Montana,sixty-five,(65.00)feet wide to be located on <' the following described real property: Ia; r A tract of land located in the northwest one-quarter of Section 2, • ;i T;; y r' Township 2 South,Range 5 East,PAM.it'l.,Gallatin County,Montana. The casement is more particularly described on the attached .. .....__. ilk, ........ .. ... .. .__ .. ... _ .. ... .._.. T:•; i [eh "A"and"B diich by this relerencc are made a part hereof. The GRANTOR states that they possess the real property describedabove and that they have. a lawful right to grant an casement thc!reon. Y The GRANTOR further agrees that the GRANTEE'moy peaceably hold and enjoy the rights • and privileges herein granted withoui viy interruption by the GRANTOR. A. The terms,covenants,and provisions of this easement shall extend to and he binding upon the heirs,exccuiors,adiitiiiistrators,personal representatives.successors,and assigns of the parties hereto. DATED This day of �.4;.!_, 192Y GRANTOR j�flr! �• `Y�N�� STATE 017 MONTANA County of Gallatin ) m On this _ day'of� �� J : 19� ,before e,the undersigned,a Notary Public for the Siataof Montana,personally appeared ,known to me to be a partner of XL Limited Partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day w' and year first able written. -.'. ',>- ��• sue_ ,t`'..•, "_ t:�:�*i't:�' ' notary Public fo a State of Moritaria • Y .•'f r .i•. , Rusi,ding at M.y.Commission ires ' ,Lw�aAw7�T>/:)fl4v'✓S�,��Y�..�i.� �•�a�•J�114^r"�•i•�,�saW.uwl :L•RIEL•IL1.h ••. � .. STATE OP MONTA IA ) :ss. County of Gallatin ) On this 3rd day of November, 1997,before me,the under igned,allotary Public for the State - of Montana,persont'Jly appeared Robert D.Lane, known to me to be a partner of XL Linuted Partnership,the Partnership that executed the within insiruircnt.and acknowledged to me that he executed the same fir and on behalf of said Partnership. ^ *k�9TV.ESS WHEREOF,l have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the.clay ..: an sr`hht above written. Notary,Public for the State of.Nigntana e ti " �� Residing at Bozeman 'w�' 91ARIA ; t�z'�`. � 1, S My Commission Expires June 21< 1998 r :•tt y CITY OF BOZEMAN Clark Johnson,City Manager • ATTEST: Clerk of the Co:nmisiioii STATE OF MONTANA ) s` County of Gallatin ) On this _dny of {�:-i:c�� 1997,b:fare me the undersigned,a Notary er on appeared CLAR JOF S N and- ROBIN L. Public for the State of Montana personally all K tN -rr:,•,•.,a,.:.. ,. Sa :,.. . , c .,. �d.. <:..yr:.. -rr>i73 .:r�'s•M.;;+'•;+t.}7+t0' 'e .... �:rfEkw^?-�+.�e'•:''�y�• SULLIVAN,knowti to rric to be'the City Manager uriil'Clerk of�he'Commtsstoti,respecttv:jy;for°"`A — ` ` the.City of Bozeman,and the persons whose natncs are subscribed to the witbin instrument,and .T.!: ackngWJ'edzc,ld:brie that-they executed the some for and on.behalf of the City of Bozeman. : j.or%j, p roc; ✓J/ , 'ota Public for the State of N•lontana ry. r.. ' �•' �L 'Residing at Bozeman �'j'}`-- ►?.•` My Commission Gxpires :F.•. • • M.r, • r FllN 179fbufm ' A tract of land located in the northwest one-quarter of section 2,Township 2 South,R-ange 5 East,P.M.M,,Gallatin County,Montana,described as follows: The sideline of a 65.00 foot wide public street(Oak Stre::t)easement lying north of and parallel with the following described line: Beginning at the west one-quarter of said Section 2,North S9°22'29°East along the east-west mid-section line,a distance of 2639.45 feet to the north-south mid-section line of said Section 2 and the end of this easement-, The side lines of said easement being lengthened or shortened so as to begin on the west section line of Section 2 and end upon the north-soul: inirl-section line of said Section 2. : Said Tract contains 3.939 acres,more or less. y. 1.ri'.. .r.... ...... : ..- ..:...., , . 1 • r:,,::.• EXHIBIT 4� 1 99'2 3'17'_ N 1/4 COR. SEC. 2 COS. SEC. 2 SE Ln N r. � t v PAY = NW 1/4 SECTION 2, T0:"1:VS'HIP 2 SOUTH, z RANGE 5 ''EAST, 'P,IU,M, GAI_-ATIN COUNTY, o ,m I InIc tG N . W.1/1• • � nN IN v En3.939 AC j 65' ; PUBLIC STREET EASE!AEN� (0/:O :'. r! B9'22'29" E } 2539.4$ w 1/4 CO C 1 a COR. .r R. / t.. © SEC. 2 SEC. 2 d 7 d � 1 r r.0 ,,'I.'.IIIS INSTRUBIENT I'.:iS I�II,I:D FOR RECORD IN THIS OFFICE ON S5'3 1'1 IIi 4 DAY OI' DECEMBER , A.D., }9 97 :- orrlCh.or COUNTY REC IDIII- rIl ) OF-GAUATIN ) A'I`_2:22 PP.-I., AND WAS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK 179 > OF AlONTANA ) 01% MISCELLAVEOUS Iti CORDS, PACE 2079 • 2/+• Y .UO � y �°� IiL:CORDRR. CIY n' z :ROBIN:SULLIVAN, CLEF OF THE C(- . ISSION CITY UFOg02EMA . y lev �,x+aecao.aaanr�cu� c��..�.�r•-,-tJ.rsft$t`a.c AS',c�as�•-.k,t,.•,•-�yy3� _ 0) . dp" P Ae PUBLIC IT EET>_-41FEI•t IN MOW r• f= _XL i,imited Parine�i'o•_.,GRA\TOR,in consideration of S 1,00 and for other and valuable considerations, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants to 'fhe itv of Bozeman, a municipal t •t corporation of fluz State of Montana,with of-fices at 411 Cast;:fain,3orc:nnn,Mont uaa 59771-0640, GRANTEE,a perpetual street and utility casement for the us,,of d:c public,in,through,and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County,Montana,forty-five,(45.00)feet wide to be located-on the following described real property: a: .: A tract of land located in the northwest are-quarter of Section 2, Toavmship 2 South,Range 5 East,P.M.Nl.,Gallatin County,Montana. ? ^•. The casement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit(s)"A",uid"E"which by this reference are made a part hereof. The GRAN'rOlt states that they possess the real property described above and that they have <3 a lawful right to grant an casement thereon. The GRANTOR further agrees that the GRANTf:::miry p ccably hold and enjoy the rights • and privileges herein granted without:ury interruption by:la::;11°-tNTOR. The m—nls,'coven!rots,and prnyiyiuos of this extend to and be binding upon the heirs,cxcctnors,adnti:ii;trators,peraona!representati n ; s.:=ecssors,and assigns of the parties hcrclo. :f= DATED this��day o f 92� GRANTOR by t= STATE OF MONTANA j / County of Gallatin ) •J.. _.__._._On thus' -' ♦ flay of 4V before me,the undersigned,'a ' Notary Public for the State,of Montana,personally appe:ued��&,?./.Q b"/ t o, ,Mown to me to be a partner of XL Limited Partnership that cxc,.u1ed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the same. a.g r�4 Y IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hvN%:hereunto set my hap_!a:!:i:fxedmyNotarial Seal.the day a and year first able written. �f. A S L r „ Nota ublic foy t e State of Montana RCSI:::nS:1t 4 ,aJ f My-CO-M:aission E r ti t AAk-' i;71 - ACCEP i rp F�l� rii... :—;Tv OF BOZFMAN Clark Johnson City Manager A.. S ter. T:, C"� ! 5^.f Clerk of the Commission X; : .: STATE OF iMONTANA ) > :; County of Gallatin ) On this/_ day of ,�_Lr�:.;. .,�ui�.� I ti.'%. before me the undersigned,"a Notary Public for the State of iMontana, personally appeared CLr\i:K JOFINSON and ROBIN l. SULLIVAN,known to nic to he the City\•tanager and Clerk of the Commission,respectively,for i the City ol,Bozeman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument,and ? acknowls , .t9 kip /Notary Public iophe State of Montana Z. I.CSIlIII1L li 4�� , . ?� \(�'Cumnussiul E pins /,• -i�•9J ' I I:\i01 Y.IIA aL•'A tilt.\1'I'U {r: 'JHf. 4` Sir . S ur'•. 4 ?:. A tract of land located in the southwest one-quarter of section 2,Township 2 South,Range S - f East,P.M.M.,Gallatin County,Montana,described as follows: The sideline of a 45<00 foot wide public.street(Baxter L:;ar)casement lying south of and parallel with the following described line: Beginning at Elie northwest corner of raid section 2,North 39"23'17"East along the north section line,a distance of 2644.47 feet to the mid-section line of Section 2 and the end of this i lasement; The side lines of said casement being lengthened or shortened so as to begin on the west section line of Section 2 and end upon the north-south mid-section line of said section 2. Said Tract contains 2.732 acres,more or less. �wr _ Bpi . • rrj Y.M.. 1 Y:• 7 �T3< .9 Nit EXHIBIT "B" N 89'23'1'r COR, 2644.47 1/4 COR. ISEC. 2 SEC. 2 i _ I I 50.00, op :*n N n cI U! in N I; '•6 p v ...:.. ....... -- NW. 1/4 SECTION,.-2 �Ow��?JShILP 2-SOUTH.;— .- ----•,.._._.Z:_..__.,_..�-_,..�--- -: I I RANGE 5 EAST, P.M.M., GAL_LATIN COUNTY, o i l MONTANA i 1 r " 1� W W CA. W I J 1-053 AC. N .TY 'fa � N d n 1 Ln j I C 1/4 COR'. j l VI 1/4 COR. SEC: 2 89'22'29" 2639.4�— z SCALE: 1 =400P } I. INDCX-D fUTrEo I -`•- 1'IIIS INSTRU(t91OT WAS I'fl.l;l) FOR RECORD IN'PIIIS oi:mCr ON . • �J53 7h 'fIIP; r1 DAY OF DECEMBER , A.D., 19 97 COUNTY RECORDER ) OR CAI;I,A'I'IN ) AT 2:23 PI14„ A1!1) WAS DULY RECORDED IN 13001C_ 279 Scf'i1'I`C OI "AION1'ANA j °:. of, rCORDS PAr`iMILh R ' -'ree:$_2.4.00 ►+"'`x RECORDER. PY�?n�[jyj/'Ip �/�, � DrPUTY SULLIVAN, .CLERK OF COMISSION , .. CITY OF 80?E11,W1 o>.saarroeoenaaa�nxt.^9-stet:.tat, t3!dS.:� 4kY.$ ' 011V All PUBLIC STRUET E:; EME 1N'T XL Limited Partnership GRANTOR,in consiccration of$1.00 and for other and vaivable considerations,rece;pt of which is acknowledged,grants to •Ilse City of BozcJIM, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana,with offices at 411 East Main,Bozeman,Montana 5977 t-0640, GRANTEE,a perpetual street and utility casement for dtc use of the public,in,through,and across j, a strip of land situated in Gallatin County,Montana,fifty,(50.00)feet wide to be located on the following described real property, A tract of land located in the northwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South,lWgc 5 East,P.M.M.,Gallatin County,Montana. The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit(s)"A"and"D"which by this reference a:•e made a part hereof. The GRANTOR states that they possess the real property described above and that they have a lawful right to grant an casement thereon. I! The GRANTOR further agrees that the GRANTEE ni:% p.accably hold and enjoy the rights • ":'; and privileges herein granted without any interruption by the GRANTOR, 'l•he terms,covenants,and provisions of this easement shell extend to and be binding upon the heirs,c.ecutors,calntinistrators,personal representatives,sucecssors,and assigns of the parties hereto: DATED this - —day of i` ` '�1 l GlL-,kN I.OI. STATE OF MONTANA ) County of Gallatin ) •y j: On this- dayof _r 1 before me, e undersigned,a Noliiry Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared�•� ,known ' to me to be a partner of XL Limited Partnership that executed the withjrt instrument, and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the sanic• 1N WITNESS W11ERFOF,l have hereunto set my hand wid aflixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first able written, VIr • ,,•- , ,mac' I� �� Notary Public fo;�ffie State of Montana "i; '. t•� :�`�`* Residing it ;Z s`• iT ' ;'"•` My Commission Aires 4 �^c..t.�.. ... -..'...e.,.:.�....s�:r?•'�xy�zraa'+ses•�rs�`Sri�. _ ACCFr^fGn _ `�` ii1� ��@tt�i •j • CITY OF BOZEMAN ; fA' , r Clark Johnson' City Manager _ 1 A' ST: o .+ Clerk of the Commission STATE OF MONTANA' i Cdwq df Cnlldtiii ) On this l t thy of `"r`4:., , 19_, N tile the understgnod; a Natary Public.'•for....the State of Montana, personally appeared CLARK JOFrNSON and ROBIN L. 4;;. SI�I J,, of to me to be the City Manager and Clerk or(lie Commission,respectively,for S. Y a an-and the persons whose names are subseribed to the within instrument,and ' at they e secuted the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman. pk 1 '{ i :'9 olan Public lilt the State ul'Muntana My Co1i)rni:<,iori'�xpires / •/.S iI 111119"FOW IXnSFAV 11n i y:•:. 5,^ J. i l ^ 1 , _ ✓.ice: '..�. . .- 't. -- ��,oragn,.rnzualuxrrifxSit±.q� :F!^<F,%'i�Y:r,;g'�`. fllr �iPaGf249� • Exhibit"A A tract of land located in the southwest one-quarter of section 2,Township 2 South,Range:5 East,P.M.'vl.,Gallatin County,Montana,described as follows: The sideline of a 50.00 foot wide public street(Fowler Aventie)easement lying east of and parallel with the following described line: Beginning at the west one-quarter of said section 2,North 01"14'57"East along the west section line,a distance of 2659.96 feet to the north line of Stvion 2 and the end of this easement; The side lines of said c.sevnent being lengthened or shortened so as io begin on the east-wt-st tlid section line of Section 2 and end upon the north line of said section 2. Said Tract contains 3,053 acres,more or less. • . .: K�.^ .t .. .r . .. o .. „. :'1.'— .. n�;r., „.,a -F"•sF.'n:::;l':.'?::Mik > F..•"," ¢ It.. �.y`T.�'S��^�C,Y., ry.,;+. r:- :,r EXHIBIT "B" ra.M M Pp1UM P.O.B. C- N 89*23*17" E ��d 7 J NW COR. PUBLIC STREET FASEN.E`1T (BARTER) N 1/4 COR. SEC. 2 45' 2.732 AC. SEC. 2 I 1 00 rn Lo N C ,:....... .__•La ... ... .. ._.._._. ....,.. _.. iVW...1./4...SECTION` 2,--TO,•rl aSrli� 2"SOItTH;-.._-----_—,..-• '-•�—•--,---�-------. _. ,MANGE 5 EAST, F.M.M., GA._:,A :N COUNTY, o v� MONTAN"A to ,2 N W L W(A M �n O� y :f C 1/4 COR. W 1/4 COR. SEC. 2 SEC..2 N 89'22'2V E _, 2 2639.45 JT l; �J • SCALE: 1"=400 'J INDCX:p 3.55377 THIS INSTRU114RN'C 1VAS FILED POE; RECORD IN T111S OFFICE ON : DAY 01' DECEMBER , A.D., 19 97 OF COUNTY RECORDER ) -- >:;c 04TY of GA-hLAI IN ) AT 2:24 Y M., ANn 1vAs 1)U1,Y RECORDCD IN DOOI{ 179 or ntoN'rnNn ) OP 14ISCELLANEOUs RBCURDS,, I'AC;Is 2087 / • ;::::;Eee$.. 24.00 $ �TanaEteGOj pRit. BY °•�1r7 . . IA DEPUTY__ p45;RT- rROBIN: SULLIVAN,: CLERK OF THE COMISSION CITY OF -BOZEMA .. .. ...zzVn.,....: ,. -..........•..... _ _ ':}:: -KiF: _ i.4•'•.y':.i..me..:,t:��-.�%' ..�`G.. s}�.� :.h! �,.:t.'.. ,a`'i^ • lP_'ytTREFT FASLs9'st�'`T �'3 ;<T_?..invited Partner;iij GP.ANTOR,in consideration of;1.00 and for other and valuable 1 considerations,receipt of which is acknowledged, grants to T':r, City f Bozeman,a municipal corporation of the State of Montana,with offices at411 East'-Iv1nin,Bozeman,Montana 59771-0640, GRANTEE,aperpetual street and utility easement for the use of!he public,in,through,and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County,Montana,thirty-two and one-half,(32.50)feet wide.to be located on the following described real property: A tract of land located in the northwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South,Range 5 East,P.M.M,,Gallatin County,Montana. The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit(s)"A"and"B"wl»ch by this reference axe made apart hereof. 'rile GRANTOR states that they possess the real property described above and that they have v.lavrful right to gnutt arr caseinent thereon, The GRANTOR further agrees that the GRANTEE iniv peaceably hold and enjoy the rights • and privileges herein grai:ied without any interruption by th::'ii?.-N r41L The terms,covenart3,attd provisions of this easement:.ha!I c:dend to and be binding upon the heirs,executors,administrators,personal representatives, :::c�ssors,and assigns of the parties hereto, / DATED tlus %can day of GRANTOR STATE OF MONTANA )ss. County of Gallatin ) Onwth�s. daxof. 4aL ,_.12 b fo e.me,. e..undersigned,.a._-._ Notary Public forthu St:ac of,�Iontana,personally appeared fr,.r_ O, ,known to me to be a partner of XL Limited Pttr%crphip that "ecutcd the within instrument, and acknowl.edgEd tg me that such partnership executed the same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year frst pole written, <" (SEAL;1�. i��..r.; pr7 M., , jam.;.: :��:. ��� Notary Public fo the State of Montana • `,: ::�: Residliqp at My Commission l` tree 99 �ne��a__.�•_��-�..c:r�rw.ommr�e.:o:w....a,.'anm.a•c,.wvcu�v,ut7,�:.v5.....e.c......a_GL '. _ ,,. y^ ., .. C:i':'i'OF 130ZEMAN Clark Johnson City Manager' :., :..-..:r-.;,,�:_•; ;1 <>�%, ,n;;,= A -EST Clerk of the Commission STATE OF MONTANA ) County of Gallatin ) On this day of �(�:�,a.,•xlGt , 19`7. i;Nbre me the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared CI.ARK JOHNSON and ROBIN L. SULLIVAN,known to me to he thl:City Manager and C;Icri ut'thc Commission,respectively.for the.-C't lof •1 r: 8Q•Oman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument,and . • <,; y ii that they cxecutcd the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman„ :. • tip 31, otar'Public Foythe State of Montana . •�w'��'t' Residii,c tIi_/!i.' ;.cw.</ My Culnmission •,xpires /, • ,�`,• IliJnl'P2T1'tIFASfi.11'I'U 5>ti; t< ' • Exhibit"A' RN 09 FAU209i3 A tract of land located in the northwest one-quarter of section 2,Township 2'South.Ranoe.5 East,PAN.,Gallatin County,Montana,described as follows: The sideline of a 32.50 foot wide public street(27'"Avenue)casement lying west of and parallel with the following described lines: Beginning at the center quarter corner of said Section 2,North•Ol'27'13"East along the cast- :::;- west mid-section line,a distance of 1334.21 feet; Thence North 01°1 i'40"East continuing along the east-west mid-section line,a distance of 1325.30 feet to the north section line of said Section 2 and Elie end of this easement;. The side lines of said easement being lengthened or shortened so as to begin on the east-west mid-section line of Section 2 and end upon the north section line of said Section 2. Said Tract contains 1.9S4 acres, more or less. I�'I 1" • i vt' r v l „_,fig,,:•:. ie i11 EXHIBIT "B” FIIN 179FACE2094 .X 2644.47 N 1/4 COR. t N1Y COR. SEC. 2 SEC. 2 1.984 AC.—_._� .XL.. I.M :• (rm:, n f' M :t r' t W. 32.50` a .:s 'i Ft .o ` zv &L W Not' 1/4 SECTION -2, TOWNSHIP 2 -SOUTH,- —'-- F rl„ RANGE 5 EAST, P.M.M., GALLA11N COUNTY, o y MONTANA ?9 in N c W tn , i� o 1— z � In, iV= ,J • W N y � n: .J � ry y7: a I Z W /4 COR. SEC/2 COR. F SEC. 2 N 89'22'29" E - 2 a1' . 2639.45 P.O.B. f P r SCALE: 1°=400' INo rD r�" THIS INSPRUNIT'sINT WAS I'll,l:'il FOR RECORD IN'I'IIIS OFFIrr nN .« 'I`•III:, .4. DAY Ol� UL•-CE;I38R A.D 19 97 ''�=`OFT,ICG OT COUNTY RECORDER - ' ' =`..COUNTY of. .LI.ATIN ) AT 2-25 P M.,.AND WAS I)UTA' RECORDGp IN ROOK 179 A'I'.r OI'DIONTANA ) OP_I,SCELLANEOUS RECORDS, I''AGr 20.91 .e.e$ :24.00 '' RIiC.a71�DItR. RY �A''l%�i_a [�,r DrPU'I'Y 7_ `k'l"4iii:-,"ROBIN 'SULLIVAN CITY OF BOURA!7 INDIVIDUAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC. RIGHT! F.=W- -'ENT THOMAS E. LA E, Livingston, MT,and ROBERT D. LANE,Three Forks, Montana,to consider- ation ofSIIT00 and�other Good and valuali]e consideration, in handrpp`aid, the receipt cf whi'ch is hereby ac- knowled`g �d�ohereb t and conv_cy te1THEfMONTANA POWER COMPANY,a Montancorporatton, of 40 East uroadway,Butte,MT 597 1'9989,and to its succ`es o"rs�'`an"d igns,an easement of v ry'tng widihs upon which to construct,operate.mainratn,replace and remove an electric power line,communira'doasystem and necessary appurtenances over, under. along and across that certain real property located in CaWtln County,Montana�an`d particularly described as followst TOWNSHIP ZSOUTHyRA GE SEGTION 2: A portion of the NW'/.being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the West one`quarter corner of said 5eion ; thence, ,IRST COURSE, IV?0114 SSE.,28.0 feet on the Wcst boundary ofrsa_id§cction; Thcncc,SECOND COURSE, S�89j40:04;E,, 4 b feet; Thcncc. THIRD COURSE, 1T89:18;0.1"E., 2601T5 feet; Thcncc. �p F,OURTH COURSE,'IN.01°31,�24jE.!1346.*I feet Thence, F111H COURSE, N:01°39'2.4�'E_., \ 358�1 feet; Thence. SIXTHRSE;�N.01'1 128:S�feet to a point on the °North boundary of suedlSection;Thcncc,SEVENTH C. 1189241-NE.,28►7jfee1 on said North boundary to the I`Jonh one•quarter corner of sa• saviection; Thence, EIGHTH COURSE, • S'Ol;l;lL42'W.,1325.SIfeet on tWLNorth•.out h mtd4seaion line to�th"e�East one�siWent corner ofLhe NW'/. of said Section;Tkeence, i NiH COURSE;�S 01 2 .4.3 , 1335E feet on said Nonh;South rrnd-section lino to the center one• uartcr come saidlSection;Thence,TENTH EIS 2640.9 feet on the East West mid•scction line of said Scc ion to the West one�quarter section comer and the point of ieginning, and containing mall 3.6 acres, more or less TOGETHER with reaaonabla fight of ingress trom said right of way ove ladds oC the Grant9rs unng cRisting roads and ttails hero prtrcticibaC,and the right to cicor and rcmovc oll timber nJ brush�from thcfiright DG-way and to c 1 and rcmovc such trees ou side el'such nigh •ofway wfiich may endanger said line or Gn'es. THE GRANTORS do creby covenant with the Granke that they arc IawCully seized and ossesscd of the real eSt ate above ilcsaibcd,t at they ha�a good nd IdWf171 rift to convey it, or any part thcii'of DATED this day of O AS E.L' E RO�- BERT D.LEA E e STATE OF MONTANA__) )ss. COUNTY OF GALLATIN On this , day of _, 1991, fxdore t c UMgncd Notary Public for the State of ontana,personallyapcarcd l�IIUMAS B. L�A+NE 'AIgD ItOBERTLrANE,known to me to be he per- sons who e�`•`"""` rc sub CSes n6ed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. II;If E, OF,1 have ercunto set my hand and alTixcd y Nota.riahScal the day and year in thts, wnttcn. ,,. ry Publi sfor the State M n Mpw Re�sxling at 2.24`973 My •onunisston Expires 'this 19thday of March , 1991, t 11:42 o�cl�ck�.�.,and recorded in Book 11,5'.. yM�,_,on Page of the ccords of t:ounty of Gallatin,State of Montana. Feet $51T.00 PROJEGT: Jack Rabbit•F.ast Gallatin Segmcnt RETURN TO: Security Ti le Eiu►Mozernan 16l kY THE MONTAN'l1 POWER CO t'ANY MAP NO.: 41 olve47) REAL ESTATE DEPARTMEN 19;1T41'4 }2 49 East Broadway TR'AGTdNO:: 2 ACQUIRED BY.Joe Sabo1 Butte,MT 59701.9989 � �l: -MST--' �• '•� 1' •��,Y t • { - - K- .i t', ,• ,17E ` Pow :���--- .. — - .�`, a�iu' - � • !?PMQA l -Mov y + _ orld lo- y+r.•i'•C'.ii' R_ . ..._..._.._......_.._.... C Sly,Mutt, Ti 1I�;y?31»....-;»�-.rh.rY r>~— _»._.„..__........_......._. .... :r«- 'rho NW -of. UA • I ............................................................. ........................ ......................................................... 4 WITNFSS.our..._..h=4......thf�_3 �__. day of_.. �IAY.. ....._.� .. ._.................19..5L1. STATE OF MONTANA, _.... ......... ..............-A,. .. . . County aj._..C a 1 L;:t 1 n 1s.�,4:... % On this..........;�0..........._day oi...............W............................................_.....in the yew before me. .Thctmoa h. ddumso,9................................................................. Notary Public In and for the State afore u said. persaaally aDvewed—........ f�L.tFa4..Xjk10e•nnd._Anna,.Niklee................................................. . known to me to be the pervan.Awhose nmae P......_are..........._........._subscribed to the within tnetnunent.and. acknowledapd.tooW,that._.»they..._...............wmcuted the same IN 1 - DOTP, 1 have hereunto set my hand tmd_affbced my Notarial Seal on the day and year l�ihL 39 Qslf•:%xbove written. Not ry Public for the State of Montana. i Reeking at........&.bi1.'lga......... Montana. Cam. .y*s�T I My Commission Fxptree...Jul lr..zz,..195z ' f I , .. i w � 11 SS� t F � i.•�'?. c•'.t '� i i I 9t j -Alt wY•• �••} ;,t"'+3�1:�?'t �� th,i ;,7•,� '-��; ��� 4 ' '�i .•t�7�:e±;�nM 'y'.�. ���._ ' .r'} �.•r.r. t e� tr .h�r+ �[1r�3S�-.jaw l��'�'`s�?�` i".f• ".'-�..•'7�"r.�.c�.#9 .a. . ,:5,e.aS,,"..: • si��=-;•'•ice'^ .. ��-:�=,a::.,:;v;':;:� `=<".;.. ,1. 'Sty rrct ,33 • tASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT FOR ==;. SEWER TRUNV THIS AGROXNT, ��-10f anr, "n�c.-�f,d ini r) i11':1, 13 'Jiiy of August 1980.•.___ A. I).rWl by and hetwn_on Thomas ➢,- - Robert Lane �_—••�.__ party of the fist part, hereinafter ' called the Grantor and THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana, in Gallatin County, the party of the second j: part, hereinafter called the Grantee. W I T N E S S E T II lr WHEREAS, The Grantor_ is the legal record title owner of r'. See Attached Exhibit "h"_ V. more particularly described be ow, and - f WHEREAS-, The Grantee,' in the ezercise'of'its''pawer and authority' as a municipality of the State of Montana, proposes to construct and install a Sevier trunk and necessary appurtenances to serve various propeerties located wiihin••the Val t. Su ley Unit 4 ' r : portion of the City of Bozeman and one or lore such lines would run - across the Grantors land; and WHEREAS, The Grantct desires to acquire from the Grantor , and the Grantor is willing to grant to the Grantee an easement and right of way across the above described property of the,Grantor , • s and his _ heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, for the purpose of instol'.ir.g, operating, using, repairing, replacing, maintaining, and removing said sewer trunk and appurtenances and for such other rights of access and incidentaT rights as are hereinafter described, all as hereinafter more particularly pro- vided. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of $ and other y considerations in hand paid by the City of Bozeman, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the covenants and agreements between the parties hereto, the Grantor ' has granted, bargained, sold, conveyed, and confirmed s an by these presents does hereby grant, bargain, sell, convey, and confirm unto the said Grantee and its successors .and assigns the follow- ing rights and privileges forever: 1." A perpetual easement and right of way for the purpose of installing, operating, using, repairing, replacing, maintaining and removing a sanitary sewer thereto upon and across the above described property of the Granter said PasPment and riaht of way to consist of a strip of land thir_f-130) _ feet in width being more particularly v described as fol lov.a _ ...._. ._. _... ... __. _.... y � 1 l>� Y,..i,�r :a�P,s r�,''.! 'a`a %,;.t, ',�'�. 6':_?'„'�_�' .: .F�,-'..:'^^J,..', .'•'S. '"".•' a:a?:�'t •w- �'y: 7"'e ,.F•� tl: .i%' _ 2r. .:y• '_ _ .,.K.4r.;..,:r' _ -,:.r, t•i."•re. .. :t.� s•.rr 5„ i+6+ rr..yf., - R'S.x 12 y� n• :',4<t�S Y...,Y: ...F:..,. ..Y. 4�r•[n;.. s:..., �, ...e.,:F: �,� ,:'.' 'J" :.f•,.". .J�'•' .fit$+ - - s o :+ '"'S<.;,W.,'S{+y^il. a-s't{y-,. '=�eu.'!",9',`ni•F,. :•!4• 4Fcr.f-�-,...r<u>: r.,.;rtc__. :.u:.:•'..7, --�_;,<.�.. .,.. >iii;�:;.r::a' ,:=e`;.`�: :.<",..:e,_ :a-,..��d:yx's aS��•r._<`:r;,r....Y�:+yl_^...,s ryi�.�.?tri:?-':",-'�.ti.._4�,> - - ,:a:.>-:n'.�,.Y ..f. 3-: v:Y•: .4 S..n,>...:F•EKE.d.a RnNL F11 NAM 14 p J "' , ice_..^,-,,-e„-.. .._r,n_..,j�.,.q;.,w-,+.fu r; ...r,t.,:..' •/I'{ .•k ���:.,A _ ..I..*:.. t.': 1. - c.: ri}5::7.fi.{•. _ is {'%:':. 1. F "1 Li't `' t4 .FGJ 1^.ltu? s; CC7 !:� l7 0 t5C'/ =�`.1• ��)a�T3r�;11:7 ItitJ.'> 1 L' lnc. +c,L'-lijR 1 ., n5.1 .U : .,,.S1Lt . r �ryP.ti•1 ^ ^'•ry;y fi ..� y':" _"p•' ('}.>;r' 1 -'Y :`#1t'ii ,. •,' e ','7�,`�y�'k' i+e"`_... iPr , > 7t?t;; t.:�'' iian 'pin "f.ouhc. in''placriy"'`U>e'11c.. 'Cto ti'ti t!•�J A .:!T c.Ft ._...., Ij'0nq el re. :0u111 Iinc ;)f .3c;cti;::.n 2, ^ciwnsft-ll;y 2 ^n;atlr., cl.1 J.:. the rCf t,r;rlirte o° I)urstan Ilaad, 1 Y'GhF�;'ft4 l). 4'r 6f 00 f p i 9 n r y ent: thence [dort.t O1 16 ..7 .-G-49,57 feet to the trim point of hr,:tli.r,ninci; thence ?Jor,th (11.r' af,i'. xa, t: a distance of 15 fe©t alone the' t f c . C t h men,er,lint; �I` a 3f; .ae't pay s'knr::,At of Whirh 15 fort each side of sa;d cn_r,terline„ parallel and. ^'< eQnt, iglu'ous the-roto, shall be tlr.antec, as a permanent utii lity nasmment- ; '% `%:_• Ci:cn; :r^ flartla 090 45" 10" East, along said centerline and Para] 11-e4 ^ �t •` =::r? c7>:3'S' f 0 1& North thereof the 'Iorth line of the Southwest on'e- a ac�xtmr at, n.2, lol/dlSill[? SOUI;I, Range 5 !:ilct, a distance of lf. ;?,•20 frioxe.>or less, a GO foot easement of which 15 feet each side of; ;:•canterliiie parallel and contiquous thereLo, shall br, .cjr:a'��.rrterl as a'. Pe-Mij..4an•t utility easement and 30 feet north thereof•„ parallel. arSd i.ontlquous to the i4orth side of the permanent utility easement s.lia..11 be granted as a temporary construction easement; thence North 016 39' OG" Eat, along said centerline and parallel and 865 feet " hest thereof the West line of the Northeast one-quarter of Section Township 2 Sout.h, Range 5 East, a distance of 2614.94 f_.er_t to_:.. . the South right-of-way of flaracr Roau, a G0' foot casement of which F 1.5 feet each side of said ccnterlinef parallel n:u] cont:iquou•:, there— anted d to, shall be rlr as i permanent uti.lil'y easement •, Lii a 15 foot tenporary i;onstrur_tion easement, parallel. turd cont_i.q;to is to mac'rt. s.ic3e of said permanent uti.li_l';r casc-rr:t. - aS•�i ^t l(a) fir{ ; ... F L �,•�,r11jT11 _• f:..ir-•• f _>.. h:., . ..,,.Ay.Ja u,.T+a••f S"• '�,:y. ..l•Y• „f: ':+5:.. �iP.: •Y.'t n ..r. JSa;•.7,.�:-> .f:f<' •t•. '5�.�::>Ir:�;: .4 ter.'.<,. ., � :.. ! ... :.�tl::f(ra':.f.. :,.:::�::^.,!•>:rn.+..Imo. �.`.F. .:,�.)„ _fit.: LiY fba, Vic xi - il ♦1.y'`ytSy. ../'� .b�'•• .aF. ..,?�i .3$-...'n..t��f.-.,h.-,.;. rust .L. ,. ..... 5 rk r Ip 1 .f .:'S•.Y. L x. SY - %1. 3 i�• (r_aY'. .}.: 4 r�orid'r: x_ a •A,r�� :`a n ati'y ?Y••:'.tr,. ':i"' fs-:c't - f-.: :({s '(4. .�:>:_fi•. 1 o„'fry. -•:J� .r .1'7• afr :L• •.5'i..} .' ,f aYr.i t. .7.+ �:5.'!' [j._.;.,y,>%,. f �.. l.. Y.+,.. adv ...t:>..x.::•'-.. .�9�iti_. yii,+�,- .,,Y rt'!a . {,....t•..:f>� >t._,.c�L.,.1-, J.. c.f yy Y• :fti ,f, J - :dr� wf 4'G:6! ..L.e E -.�."�t,;i=T;_ ,. .r.: _ ,.,j.•;. L a a ai•. .�.{.;..f., ..�.,, `rc .�..c..t ,.r•:. •a :ou-., .>,<.wr:-»:. ..J.. .$.-a�e:_ \ y.. :�e' Ytr .. �•w':Jn.:t .M. ..r...' "f.'. -'c.� Jz;:",::;<;' :r:�n ,a:.'•r h.....�µ .. .. .7, .. _.i a..• Pn. ... ,.. � ,y...C�:,:ti r;+.: ri:' `;ix�-c^,'iiL`o •.2.,...,:�;.c ,9':•g.'•' :;ncl iJ:+,•x::,..i !.t..t.:,t:. K. e. .:it. ..9.,.A. �'•:'•h"•ibFi. r_F k�^ %J.1>L... .rt I? ,.C.�L.::r. ,c�l'''Y`6:�: ,✓..�..'•'• ^.r. .7/. ::V•n irrS� ...y"r .r,. ,.ti.s .r.Yt•.',•�', •v. :[•�Lr i., :p !' r`T"':ip:i .ds '.k..s" k k at" ts:... 7s,...,:•.;^ <�rt. x:;.;T>i: <,,..;,, •'{t Fir.,: r'�=�- ,� rf .,n •:ttq �F:t�`•":f.�fr':•>al.N;:�'r':k�.• .>: : . •t.i:'t' ;.<', x^•, r :�y',:^ !,.L.''. t:r.'r .T.r.. uc:<��.$"yiK _ ';4;y d. �,.•,v ,as..: J...1.. ?;.. S .. ?,rt s,fk,..< »5`'r.r. .,k :7t •7 kp "1.�;'' .... s, ,•.y?: . :'-:. 's,..'a" .'�.4.4,' i?•5t . ,.is.,,rhr ::•'., �f.., .r.,-f,.',l '��•'Y''y '31r: -•n.,r 1. _'...r.l"a{,7:. ..as•'4f;' pp i ..A.. ,rr6._ls ,:.5..ri?.r''c`•.,:..:r•..,n ri,.n::�nx.,..,¢r. ,. ..g;,, .:E j•., - ,iF.l, .f 1!:. ;Y' ' v-•-k"r` '.:.Lt.. .\.. ' yn ..l%?a., •,>. M1 c;i�`��A'i' i'F: :k .4. ,.{i', w?..•t�- , '•i , via, ,.. .•�:-i'AF'_,1. �.. .,::�`�'i?-iv`'... n,,I�l._.;.:. ,Ii l.. - ..f,J: „_3?>< .{. C;,, t.-f-::;:�r`�`y`'�%ii. �'{..L,: '•kn.. ..,:+,;.i��� �.Ly:-s .i.: �rv,^. . •rr,. ...t..,t...>r.. ..ly .: .+... ,},v ..' .: ... .'�.t✓r_ to ":�i� _ ���.._ '••• '+k�•..c.�¢,.a. t.cS�.;..> i:'•. ..wbzt'rXl lue:a.Lfl-�» `7:6..; ':'r,.:>?.:�s: ::J;.<.•:iA�?.tli�.Y •F:..•r�..,_�... :'. .:'R� - W_. i.y.n 4�'r.••.> •t»•< >�`, .,,a. ;y'�,a'�" - ,,..- ��::<�-,c-_ Y': ,4-.:-`;;-tn _,,a., i'.. :.•'^.\`�ifn. • ..{,i?. y ..F"-::�.` .',>•� >'"t. •:r`,,- y �,4r'• w•:rr .i•;.: •,• _ ',•: .. :•+a%}t:±sz' . =53... ' A'%'-" b:F::': :�... _ ',`j:. ro tr.•' „Enf'.S._y.,t. _>:UA -'i;}'�.+.ayst'r� '-r! >a:•.52ir-.-'.'. •>a. �1. •i!�o:�`,�,••s. :riS N;r��.?,x, ,c'. >�i:�..a.' �,-` r• ..sr.S:.,,yy�±x!`'i':f+"d?k:� ?• -- • +� •ra' •5r- 'Jt'.3:,,.,�; w�i +L: •�'^.,vTt{' `f.. :tv _ :.:Ty..•tom 'pr-,^.-z>._,....:Li'..v- t:,.r- ,an. 1r' "} ,r''.ixb .`tAy"}Y?,{}`. 9. ;,E''°S,;ci ;,rr`:�, _ .,H9:`F'.:i� r- ?.ig Y,:,+.•i+:'P..KCc<.',:-4 �' �-..-e;�,<F ;:>`S'{'l:Y{�!.o-eF'7''•,al .>;ti_s;.,,,,,. 'fw f: .<� erg •t .�''' + ,.�• l,. r. .�J. 'fYiTi ..xw.:f'-0,E":"3a� +':z?,„r,• .,•¢t;r.'I -,�•-.,: >`�rx��:ati^-tZ.;:.• t�lj''�'/,-•'e.; _ .. W �, .,! S7•`'_• ?. fr;•'Tkt(: •S � tid ,' ie$1, 6`4 -4,,.i+. ,r.33'i,�,i, i��'a ^... Lr'' �..+ Y,' t i'•,.•h,r ('`' hsnt', � .,�. �.. >;}•-,•� r;,`••-;%'�k .v" ,s.:A.. a"it..,,•r r'`re.`et .?%;Y 3.. '`�'xr .,&,., •y,:it4.,,�!l%3K':.:^ "a„ "% ^fr)1,$'a �i:' ,, �''� R a •„ s tir a'�5 ..ydt� - :7n� ;r'9 :;y {• r. Y te-a f: 7�(St-t«•.-,r_2. ti a.?,. 'di,•-' ,u:..�`�:.^I{t;^w::�:^_�')fi.gar .�.t.rJ�`•�'l=r. `'fi '+� .I ,=. �,•%F. ,�, xz:�>•,A."..*s,N': ,:.r., rf n :rY,. � u= a ,y_ �^ ,a:. .::'�?;.�:..:?: t rL'v frr r b, <ir+�!' :`.fir, r 2A••'n� � w��i' -:3:3;§'::.?:r..r,.'rnr<R:.�..Jn:+':.:_I::;t..'f,.'-.i...:;:C.i,:Cw'..r`.;;i::,::?�•t,td%:��'!_�..,,�c- gi g='� M R! 'M gg 3MV! "F2 'M A L kt 2. The perpetual right of ingress and egress' to and from said tract of land at all reasonable times for the purpose of instal operating, using, repairing, replacing and maintaining said sewer trunk and for the removing of same if and when desired by the Grantee, its successors and assigns: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described right of way with all the appurtenances and privileges unto the'said Grantee and to its successors and Assigns forever. The Grantee hereby covenants and agrees With the Grantor- as follows: I..- That, in connection with the installing, operating, using, repairing, replacing, maintaining and removing, of said sewer trunk it will replace at its i. sole expense, all existing fences, ditches and other appur- tenances of said land that may be disturbed by its operation in a condition equal to the condition thereof existing befnre said operations were begun, or as near thererr, shall be reasonably possible. • 2. That, during operations involving excavation, it will remove the topsoil from the trench area to A depth of one foot, or to the Aj.11 depth of the topsoil whichever Is less, and stockpile said topsoil for replacement over the trench, and will remove from the site any large rocks or surplus excavated material or any kind of debris that may have been xc, exposed by the excavation and remaining after backfitling Y is completed and will leave the finished surface in substan- tially the same condition that existed prior to the beginoing of operations except that the surface of backlilled areas may he mounded sufficiently to prevent the formation of depressions after final settlement has taken place, 3. To operate, use and maintain said sewer trunk In such manner as will not hinder or prevent the proper cultivation of the tract through which this right of way is hereby granted. r... 4. In the event that it should become necessary for the Grantee to re-enter the Grantors premises for the purpose of repairing, replacing, maintaining or removing said utility lines the Grantee will reimburse the Grantors for any. actual 'do6i__E6­'ifii-Gra n-iors premises or crops. F. -2- ar.'�� ;Rf�.•-"'rj°.Fl:Y3''�Yu c7!'?jrty;,a- � 1 Y 7 4!r�.:y_, . .:��•.�. ,- 'Y.:�'�-�..Nt`�� .•�;a�';,'_ > •ps-{"i�T...,.�„!r'_r„1;,,f`�,�.•.-�' .v':�.t',=,,•�,�-'�''C.•��.'• 4•Fik',�`tT yw; - °'��Yr?!"•5S;'.•"~r.3;;';_'c_.'�,%`�"r..:: c<'`'3•°. .:yi.,;`:'F°s F.:.�.d: it 1'7anL. A,. Gl sUILJt S re, .. r ky �z..,r �,p':�r�:=-• _ram. Ilr€�p re5' `>•;� ?�X..p ,\;'tiGl.-••I'.C..I:I).. '('`:i.l' c)I' Lr;'/:.i:ln'ut (�t'•t I r' �L; . • � �.r+�:Ci�:.c-. ... _= - S' �.il .�(. t•r L Lsr-i;i r slia.I I be rr:•s,r:;ra: 'i.hl.r:: I'!ar ane. "}::::r _ - :�;;`:;�• -�`:.�'.;.':.[I '�± �IiEi:C::E.t•' [it'gj7':,)••I:'i.r_!n;a.C!? shnr•r:.• p.l' {:i1!1 :i.I1Sl:tl l I;tl, E4i11 of, I'ht S'j)t:r.i a I {mp rovenion t. Di s 1.r i c I. known :tnd nt•1•al.l�' closer ti Lhr C)ri±;in:.tl l'`arlec ;l. IrnrllC , ,,. rnstoi iatinn :tx Chr• s;tmcf re1111.1•S Lo t110 I.iil_:II irrll r?Xr'IIl€li119 ;IIIV A . y�p[5t IYt - IN Na i!= €e tt; k 5� `tR �3 :p tt j • :{t t '�Aiti •-�. .1-'w'r'.•l+"Y' :i�l:.a M.....•+r; ...4y�:),.y +d�: .fie'� .ii`� -5..:'• IC��•'�u�r` :.Y" .Y .ta ;•IT. i-3'. :�s'4 --:L`. !ti.:=M�:y�! .:.. -.T".?..'yr+'. .I }} - Grp,•:•:,. 3a .r:v+� :l.a:.o.• _,..._o•' : .•'n:.:'!4°."�1S'....:. ..,a ..,.....�1..,' ;a: y:r t. i'yi'i 3.'�y '`s r t .y ..1:: .•'Tt�.ti i=_ y:e'. ''t..r..r_.:, ... aa..r..� '•.....•............ ...-!i'a'r °'•:..: .. r,. : _ :ht:_ p+n.SS n.tsh'�t'{, '.•f-''wr4'+.e,• >� ...a�:T" •r�w:: >f. r.Y,- 'x:+ ^t +z;>{ .4•.a^F.%;7'}?st";'s?- -.5,?.;,:-,:n.3---r.—;:.�r.^�-`:`�'r:--"^"'1?. .N..,.;.,' ,{. a'�;�s'•.,. .l�`?��U.....��;ti::. .... FAA •rS' F r y E � l'r• ,.,.....!ii'+`^.r 9' ...o-s�{..,.-:,t.i!:54'1>•.^i:r�..^i::,;;_..-:,Y...+:. .r.:...:.i- '�,,,1.: j y.'3. (,. . ,f; ti�' -- ^r+ T. "z. •fir .:F :r :C {• ��rr.�=XryS.^t}fj n:'Li�:.:, r'�-!>e.J'i _ .. -`3: - �p 33 F1�Y..'Fi�..;''�•'i .. W. -TT'Grantor hereby coverien-tn and agrees .with th-e'Grantee ae follows: ks ,,fhsi,;,•.•'...' '. L•,. Tha-t at no time will they build, construct, erect or mainta4n any permanent structure over or above the said' Sewer trunk unless such structure is built, constructed andaincnined 1n such a manner that it would no'[ interfere with -the operation, use, repair, maintaincnce, replacement and 'removal of said sever trunk 2. .That the Grantee.,may' peaceably hold and enjoy the ri.ghts �''• and privileges herein granted without any interruption by the Gra:ntor or h1S successors and assigns. r 3. .T.ha-t they have been lawfully seized of said premises; that they have good right and lawful authority to seal the same and that they and their heirs, executors, admf.nistra.tors, successors and assigns, shall warrant and defend the title to said premises unto said Grantee, 'and"its*succeistiri and assigns forever, ag'ains-C the ',awful claim and demand of all persona whomsoever. It is understood and a reed. b and between the parties hereto that s R Y z this Agreement shall be b-indinR upon the heirs, executors, admi.niatratora, +, successor and assigns of the G-rantors and upon the successors and *r. assigns of the Grantee. 4 t. a.; rc z. t CC e �t �t) -a���::'�t`'�.'i'v. ..v:.....+'�r..'i`Yi:G_:;:T•v:,:-.ti..,.r^:9�....�.n'^A+!".•,-.-r.-..-+x-..-w..>.�....�,-.�.,..._-.-._..—._...�.__ _ �w9;�l�t-=d+�:•,�K;:.r?s�Y•"�i°:Yfil'Fi•Q^ Sf2w•N!:R:;�i`f�n'1?%e:d� �+:'fF';'�S"•�.�,. �mc� .2 r 'I._tr'•:...-�"��:i JC'r>:X 16 w.naryJj .D -.y.•rs�'oe,:ow•X'_ .4{ A.:. . val { C 'deb'•'+i1'J.�' K+:t�"S:..,���� _ - ;7`a•�'- sTM'-• vows 1 i. MH j:. 2/%•:j'e.i:+•w�F t:'J��;:.?a3 q;tv?� :r`SL_`..'•. ?ilTti%iS b;'t!c.P.r.GP Tlw S%Ft.t! par t.hn 'C5. r; li ••;�.: hi;r+':+.acr,.o sct twit h;lad:, and ttr.:tls tale d.ly an '! ,; _ _ .�../..�:✓lC,�ez� _._.. to STATE OF 1.10: PA A ) (TUnEY of (all tin) on r!lis "AMM m.' , .. .:r. , j 1%uhllc to :Ina for Stcj.tl .� ."- 111•T'J71 ryll ^ i lxr.runrr'It, ::xl zrknC,%./I ' .,. 4, ��j, •: :. �ill 1, •r , .•I :•Irnl;l.l a4„� t i.�l.... 'i)tf'ic i?Qi.��i rltn. �li !;�•,'._...:n. i'I';1;1:::1:.1 IS 7 is f, Q 't. . o+ ;fit; 'Y. _++ '.;,.::Ii�ia?'„t.�',�+'.*"'�+J 4:r.:i,E58/y�iRk'""r"z•!'!,,,;i3�.9�.�s'.'�*•.s"�.S;b�s'3:_r�'e:3?b:.x�?isetw`croayp•: *�f.�;Aar:..".:`"s"' r- '.'�ti':4�:�.sM:..;; .7t>: ire . -`+wit ?�L��?S71a;;.tea'<f;=c::�.�•`.n�\.��:7.:i .. _ ..4 ti�.f%�t�:'�:?�r...,st`.v.'.:Xi 7i-R'.,J-'c•..':':^':.r:..;�:� :w: - 1'./;: r��y'ai .yYyl!l;.}.L v£+,r %;Y-i2•^'- ei.��.• � .. �:�� F r .i5'.v;:aY�✓!:�j'r'v`;v-•�a:'Ssev^..7.� .J: r'• �,..:�,:.:'..• Na, n r t�:;: r+�:::lK:.: ` �������K"cf^:`fa•`Cltj Coiimi aslon '.. •.{; `•"�• '� '�%:'-•'�H!s.>•� - is , :.n:.;P, a ::ice • .� .•-. RZz sa'. ht ISJ j:.hllr ' .i lip -ALA �._.fYGtrc•:�k:.,w:i to . + ••j "ttl N;,yor and Clcrk i th:: City Conuttis:.Ion Ce!:j,�t tI.VP ^f IScT.GIl15n, who BC. I ames nrr, subs:r lhcd ;o i ti xt r.hin a t , Cru^;lit and ncknnuledged t,; mo !:hit chr;y Pafec,.tted r.h.� same for srul nn rr•hali' oC +tid Clr.). .a: IN '..JVIESS VIIEREOF, l have hr:;cln,re !;p;. or, W,.W wid my ?notarial Seal on the tray ..r,d VCAt' lu .his !:ertiilCrte ri.t-nt nbov1. urCI-;'vri, WI,��:'• •,�,,r•- '�'•` 11 / z eci t. 4 ......_ Ic I !! -.... ._ , ._.. .. . ... $ 25 �aD:t ,InJ •... . :ix:I; 58---._::o _ P1.ISCELLAfJEOUS- '�. '•3ao . .... .. .... .. q `Cu4& a. �itid .. 4es Prcnrder. 9v. �'r[�iN.G, /1�rGl -l�• _. , Y' Rt: City of Bozeman 'I r • ,-.�na?a?•rii�'!R;�3' .�:. �..,_'97Y9,3CQ,tc!�u'rw+.�Y��.'i�.'?.>+F'<,'s?Y��S� ry¢��.+.'.t3ay� �:�'Lkry¢s.F,�+�..,.' :�S�,S.=)�,y,+ ��.�.� a ..}:':�".?7:�,y.'y�. .�! ;'7 yi"., •.:� iSl' >"YT(f�):�'i�v ��,`>.� .';:rE,.:� :F4`•Y�.j :Q: tti. '{��';���:�'.��: i,�,.!�<J�.::�, - ,s/_. .! :i$j'�,:+• ':+Yo�:;.�!;'.�.sy,Sr..:?.:3; .jl.'. :rGFJ kv- a." -Y• :-K V� �v4 �•j: ssue�.. :;s... ,�.:,. •T�:^.: y .f. ::,s:'�. =t' ..� •"�.;:::,`,;�•'K.. _ _ ice.. .,-ax-s. }}.. ;:'-'�'. _ri'`-.».-:err-•`.-:i---� iq rU. •f. n•.G'..SI:.•v'a:G.'Y :.:Y'.. 'i "�� -[uJ1•I.._f:fir�::. :•,��' 'cFY::.1.. .f _)^-ar..�.-1 p > `^�.�c�Jai:•;.:°<.;y:�.#'�+_ �d. :yr,-?w:i':'" 7:. ::%i: ''i'iy•-^.,�-."'- .l. .�..,. .s:r.::r;'crK:.�+ , +,,:+c�_'P�j i'�yy'-<ns'? "k y.zy.:.s=•" yk.. r� ,.,,� " _ ..`4 a-.-':i ''etr"f'�:'�r:,�%v^. w�;�t=�',a,.�,.'iK''�.,%a:a--:,-- ��T,. � l�a'_'_�;.' ::�14-r":,•-.�,.'dh- �::_�' i4::Y.:�...,,�::•. - - F 'A1'jj" J.t 1L•I f' Ci •� RSc:T` .r „?;i -:;Z:;l;;:.) .1•i'�..J � •x+•,,p .'Sy-' ��': viS�1'.::::iri-!:t' z^s9'b�., c:1 X;..; ..r:i Yr'• iir^ � ..r ..Y .-T+ y' Ij ..�.f`'v.:•y.'I•:F..f-":�..:.... is rioN. . v 1-- G I CGl'VSTR(/CTi'ON � � >: . / :20:-' zV':::ems•:�+5'//? r. z'`•: , .— ~�+�: �;�;�,�,:.» -,.lV •--� .i• �O7�/ST/?UL"T"a7dV ,I; /9 Ito.261' 9r�: • CONSTRUCT/pN EASEMENT Jl� CA'VSTRF.e'T/G/V. �• � � �;5 � ('�' PEdPMy4NENT T. tt QQ EASEdv1C,VT . ��',- t t: rn SEvLE/'P TRUNK �ASEME/VT-' �� •�, VALL£--N UN/T SUODIP'/-510AI ..... ... .. ..J: +:7 ,•Y#r, VQ r:,,1*�'j'r•E„'�- •••;��r+.�•,•?�a�.'r �':'.rfst7':i:;"::`se::r 'gyp• tr:::^ viy:, _ :g:y::,y.:;.�... ..�: rs•l sr� > •M�f•�.tiia /:'j.. dS:i�•>--RR S_ 'a<;J•n` ,y- '>✓1' '•i''- > - . r Slit•' ♦•:A, 1:." � �K: �:1. ::T:i �.�y ficy� .�,cf� ;, rr ��`11`F,:•i:, .i�'Zi..+'.d. :i:.:;'R ?:':a i" - d�+i>::`.: - T..!. - .� +:•.4.:w,.. r - -•;n-r, �,v/-`�s .�.� 'Z ;�,..;rr.r,. �?..f.f' .�X"a.%- ''.r.•..{�ra5,...ii:u�� 9.pp .� '�•`� -vn•N.:\k" :Y? ; ���n„�.� _:3•vti oS, {:;�j v,Ss:, ..3':�„ ,.tly,�..-,','ice•-�''r J..... .v. .� .f �,,�.'.'x:r't,;C'r'S.:X> ',?.�'• ::u.. :.�fl.'�'...�;if?1JF6£"��. :-s�J..c•_ :I - 1'-`. :i11zz.E, SENUtS[y. :,'t:;�./a p....z, ��y.33n-.-r..--.."r.:: y� �;Y;;:.'z,�.:�,,r::' ��`�.•�::l�r.�^jY'�J:a;a::�y �?;a,•; t•:' tj•,:\i-♦7:• 'xFi`s e'3=: Z.�l:".J:i1�:':\.' �,i- .��.:ii. 1 ••,•�t•!H:U'r i'in.,%•':.••'� j:':.[:':"i.5yf r r"( ::Q•J r. . e -7x: ,rX i•..�': '�: 4i, - :'l:� .,•s:7,.:::::1 Jr r HAR•R.i•E&'E:S .['CH=F1ul _.A' aifitteiiiP.erfi�rinl-;R t.cti�tttl p:.1.1..�SFh.f. Eft; _ �'dr�"'OU.CL•A'S��[.a` ,,,. ..�.._t�..,.::,..,; n. ,Ol. ,�'!� .�a:, �Jl; GC u• ;t; .1... ,.r.:.M!61 ni<otle ooii nd:, lila�i c'•coti idcr't'n:.tn:t rntl;r ird•{'ltti'rii ci7i f.t li(clt.i: hc'i h`"ad Howled ed:z:,. X.a.. . 1 it.io 1 NMI,, :..::r t:id`r,iJ.aY i2.:.:.. } :: _ .. ,,.i.� 4Y: - .: ...,1 I.k _ 5. 1. .. 4 .l. ,Y ..8:,,:.,:•. >. �_>do.ih�rcb prantxand convc..•;tO:THE'MONTAN'A O�V�`�iCU111jri1NY 'ir;:i fontifni':eor:'orationj* g0 a toadyv y;yl uttc}M�,3.7i1�h7 9�.414-6`its stici ci5iir .aiicl`Ilssi"01:'int c f�cnicrif-'ql.`•varyiii :Wid'rtss::up'ori ": ;; ht �€gacgtlsYr �[opc :fc�.mdinifiin",.rEpl"aca.and renittivc:Qri'ufCdirlc.;j?ou!cYliijc.Cojiiit>uiiicatio .--,Iystcm arir! x encc�csstiRy apP4t�ldn6cs 4vcr,yndcrf along a'i121'ticrps�-.iltiit ceYltiitl rcrir.:prpPr fty::�ocutcil' n(`,allatii'(ounty;':;:T;+ �x~•yMa!�h�yiarta}arld,par;�tcifrdr�}r:dc`serrbrd�Va f411'otrs;to-wits :�t:�;;:�::��'.:q.:�TW�` [7d.P%2:�51).Y3`.Gt�:nrF\G:Fi:S`IirkS'4',•1':1ifi�F, .. . ''• br'[ti5t�5.- }t' 1 t: t r F r y - _;- r ; ,of tllc`.�1../cNV1W/;, :Ii/.;SfV/, oi1cF the lVh}�� 1;5(i/;oF56ctio.ri 3'b'ogiiiati-at:the iGacr=:bn tiurfcriarnc sa'd',Seciiok t; c',q.- , , r-of t ►3,fhei-Cei:5,:'9"4X( R+.•, 1'1•.7:7 fcei,o'ti the F.:ast-W.cst ,.: ,Cciiori i r. „ r , s •�n[iI="cc.lorYlinc:o.f•,'..' S�. ttYti[i6•nottltcastcot`iic" n('aiids�iiiil'1'V,:iV'�V/.•51 /,;saiil'cor- "'" Cirig:tlic'tl ii�;pt}i j)oi`:bc�il%iq, 4ic6ncC rP(-,'1'(:.()lfJrSf: S OR°S')'33"V�:i•20'.0"feet oh-the 1 1 � f - s: %:S:13%,;t1'tcricc:SC:LI)Nt) lb'URSE;S'.R9°5T'ieW.,609-A :flienc�c,^:'L':IifT( c8h'?00'flCl"4V., f31ba feat trienee,.f(7UR'i'Fi COURSE, }lr,;.34' _fcia to fhe:Watt [rnif ikibry of the said \rl3%SWV.; thence, 't`3:' . .'` C.(}'di#J2: �Q'>?WN"1il.. 3S.ti\.feu oil ntid 1�Ui;st_fi6110s r..y ik iNe nortliNvest:cornar of said c,q r S)v1-'1 f(:C)1::IY' (?, \i:.0ih3(i`3li-'tl 241-Aaf on Ilia,Nest.boundary of the ;SI;GN.-�I`IT C0UA"$F-, 141994940!1 :,4,2 fceu.th'cn•"cc; [s!(il'F:fll' t` : '` ' (:011l°St •:iV:$ RT1bG I,,-.I`3'2d;f•:(oet tq tho\opxh=:S:ouflY.:riiitfxactign find ibf said'.SCctiori 3:.. ...........r,.____..__.._._:.._ . - '� , S Cr ilie'ncC; ;tq\`I'l1 (:(7[tllifiFi,•$A(1°Y2''f�2"tiV,,4F,5 lbae.Gd:g. mid=section line to the center one- fti-.g liirfcr cornar of cald Seviion 1,iNda'ce;'f•1 N'I'rF'(()i�lt f,, lV:R9°4SU"C., 65h:2 feet on the : ; :\, '[3irst-1Vest mitt-xetfinn lino el Mi tl S.ccfia'n 3 fo4l.ri itie}so'rri#.of beginning;containing in a'i1 2.1 Beres;rnpre or k:& • . A IMrti`6h of the 'ii%i W Ili'I %;:Sl %' ti1`';S,cctioi:3':Kegidriirig at•:fhc'northwest corner of said of:Cc¢t%q't1' lr"fltieiiCg;;f G}iS'i GC?11[fS[i, SAS-fecf on the ' I.ic5r�11tCSt fi51d•SCCIiUt1 hil.i;tlf CWItf`•S`htf 4i1'-,j-I il%KiinjitVCsf cotiiZr.of"Tract F"as:recor<IeJ in U'tk'I: o p t�i.. :j; . 1 f uCdtls f?Lt i.tl'�c�,;I°°.(�.,:prYilliluili,^ii6.altc-;o�ci;`of`flre Clerl:'and Recorder in Gallatin :'.���-. :('oi;l'i1'fy;•`�'1:i3:n'lotto:rhottctt;Sl'(;;,(:)i'V.�a;N)1�1IFiS,I:';:5��`I"23'bO��V:;2S•.�:Tccf.orr:Ehc VlZcst lounda s v'+ :iiT [girl "I'rrfLt I"; theirgi'; 9�164Q"()4"W., 96:$ ;fsct thcncel F'OUA-tr-II . =: 'cl)r�ii�1,, . ?t l�ct'Fria:.phfrrtin;ilcl osthound`aryofs5idj :�W:'iEVtif:%,; • F's:• : pi l:;(.)[ vO.i��.Ua"�fftr'f2"I:,; S�tS'CacE.on said bVcsi'}ioundaryxo'the lioini of bc= t1,2 fi4i:Gs"_,•iiiiire or`9cE1, lip'tiji ils d1i file i�I's!!+SW'/,;-IStI �,iV:W�7iS�V_•% ;in'tJ•the .l':%:NVW%NW'/.S.W% of Section 2 rir r.. , :°'_1;dRIliiilirK n'6 thu northa�s[49tiler:cil"":iract:9 as•r8toril.cU'ir"r Book to of 15ccds on rage r6l>and x , fhlc :hi;l;lia al�iea of (1u Clcrl uiiC:It6cort(ar to <iallrtin (oimty, Vtontar5a; thence f1R°S`I' rF is r t`1 J1 S1 i ;trl(>bk'1J1'I ,r 2Jl l i lcnt'on t11c t asrVWc'i-;Mid-section limo of said Sccuon 2-io the ;'r`" ;`•z�iJl'tii'i5i.ire::iI i,f'irl�pr:t`iciiciii`',Ztiriici ,flsciic'c';':S2-C \!k• OU:R`S:E S.00°4f'38'.E.;57.1 feet on'the ?uifl:+"iiicf`< 'ill=scar'fiir•:JiiYc°`II1!I`IfF)<:;C7.1'1'IYSG3:':S:Bh°73'0'I".W. 20:0Peerthen'cc [n.U9tGl-1 i1S•i,'nr.'i+7y:•;rF Jr. ...:-i.!.�.Y t ..;l.h..n,l:.f;.;�a,,nv ::7:, ., '..�. ' o. „ t 1 Ge�UI IJ, Utl ��S1 Ws 2S,IT.'lcat tii-cnet.i --T0-Tl C-0U -,ST: S;R). ibOPW 229.2.6 feci.to e. lii niS;l'Ite(a:v;:.lxptrns�[(rjt•ti ifiif"Ti t t 4';ilici'iec',ti'1'X:1'°I°I C01,'RSii;N:01 35'2G' ?�e ftiu 1iU,gtrlil J iksk liu[liidtrr .ta;tlit:cpoiiit of ticginning;containing in all I.:Tacics;more or icss: �K<'�"'Icf(Th I'sl?(I LZ.a��tlh riiil;rti;Nii(Ijl `riylitoi:'iiigress to and.csress froin said right of way over lands of the.-Ora'rrCors '... } ^;�' Ni{`:e tiF.iif"':;r'utl:tiffl:l'ruls'ji�liirc}�i3cticatila,and•thc right to clear and rcrnnvc a.11 timber and tirUsh:Prorti:,;;`;. . Dtllup� lF;of h)4�tlid to Cdi thuf rctiiovc•such-trees outside of such fight of way which may endanger sa;d�•iinc lfr` , ' 1rpoRt covcnlint With the Grantee that they are lawflilly seized and pugscsscd l;alic 0.t.)49,gultti it1Wyo.;dC541'thed,that they have a good and lawful right to convey it,or any part thereof. c ns.....,.:, Ixrti.a Idl7rrlevy dog of i9es: �':;•.:. HARRIE E.SMITH,Duly ppointcd `= Personal Representative for the • gib: Estate of Wiihur E.Smith,Deceased •.. .y"'.• •larr 'F.Smith - ., _ .: •....... ->i'^••+�-vim^'-. r <;:- ',!'-:;;:•' ouglas ncc Smith • $ �y.�Qff.Ya - �3. ♦ .t .- ...L'..: r. ... c:E."F i`'.t .�3 .t *t!.'•'-.••. �i-:. 'S � yr.',-r,:,5=•'%• '�+,ro�y:'p:a2,.�S?...�,�: 5. �._v.,:r�.,.- r.�r,.r <x=�f-= .t�•�aFrt:..:..(•%r=�'.�.ii'�i;a�� _ ��, t,.. air's.:5.:• au :��y� "4{ �tt�,;�:�;?.i`'� .,rY<y'�_ �i.�:r:;ti•+•a•�?:$���t:.r r L-.:, - 4f._- t>r. e-. .t, - ` ,!•<'+E'7r N-,.. �. s'.i:'1-:$s�.✓,--'s,''�' ';5i':.• +:r<.: '"-,r.' `L''�es; �s ::. Z..•.'7.,^.z„, •.T:arY�� ii; '�).r:�i ^-:- �+i":•, v:5�'! •,-..D i'+�., r}, �:...F'siiey /'{,s^e.-�,e°1��y4 - ^.it•' V:CSt.�. r 1.��3'• .:'/•1 . :�='Y•. a{-.Y(._yVn`,! '�a. �S.;'-r' �'v'�a - ./:'J e•[ •t�i` 6::::�'f. - mac-?•_tr���� .�. a � �==' a_.F:rt. rr :'i:". ._�..� �?�:= _ .y_ .,t. =`3'�' ,� r ?�..x.j .fr,: _r..a- 's: ..•: ~:.!Tic <'Y���i<,'�,•a: ,.a: �� a.��A;- '+�,'•._'.r. "cir-5'� .:hcM'•: ;Y,: .7k:.�,{+f•f.•r t•n — �fJ ,x_ .Y�r:.,.. vh,.x.y, ';F.�j 1�+.:, ��tFF.'' .:'k'`�.''1. .r,an. :5::'-:`i�.'._•�'s�.- 'i?:;4�'.6•.r: ?•:gi tiro_ - :.7q�.+�-• et't>.::.%Z:6,•if'v::. r-S. mj'!• ':F-•':?._ - - •:t.i.• ', ,t�. v $i. _ T"}�: r:r; "fa• t, •:•��>:�°- y:'-iy^''!X;.. .i. - .:t.t., •,l.u.::•...:..�:z_.:,'.,• .sr. R' -Y':'4',.. F'�i'1,...,,. •v.�:� N - .h:• •.:J^t�5:3;`' �'.':7;'`.� :�Sn:. J','� ,.,p.. r�yp:+y,, -2�f;SdJ :�v ., `:y ..9<i tX':c.f,:. .x{:J..A•.r - ,t •ti:}_3' ::s.'..•c a'�w'.i°•:.�,.•.• ar.:xr ''Y4 .7.`rvc•S.. r3"•:%�''•� - .�>..'•cr rr.. .E^.= `\Y'. - ;a. •�.1:'� i[c, - :J'` :-.e•Fs ..•ls „�:•:pl.. .�', 9.v;r7a-'. ::�y.:.. ;: _..;;'AI ::' 'NJ •!a:• r4x;J e+a '-k e,. • rzr,. r r. L±Y. r•: _1. La T t ..<_�: bn-thts:,�j:�.._�,t�a. ;of.•=,:".,....:��.Ci.`�'' - :1�$Rhc('oY"c�ttiaundci•cr ona�l ':a eared klarner f; Si>ait -:D' ly:Appoiriicd':Pcrs'on l ltcprescrituEivc}.'.Eor. P! ,�, y�s"PP , "�; °' SfiyC�a,iDeecascd,tknown to mr to be>tlic,licr4on IV osc narrit is.cubscnlicil'tti'tf q::w tli n.irlAruincnt.fin ac:.:''.:. R ?knoWl2rc)gbd td me MY.-she 61 &bte`d?the same. ,TV`W}T-t S W�FI.LR'COE;1` iavc•hc'reu�tto set my}ia'iid afid•a(Tz it my bt2nal Seal=[liey�lit;' iii}ycar_> ; 'L�i: '��`tn•fl`»s�tccrfifica`tcrltrst� boy,.d'•�4.'��"" �'`��• �''�`� �" a; s•_ ry i't7lilic fo'r 'e'-Stum.,f Monte'a' :: ': F ;'• ; u a8r;" lWg`at ;Q' "; r f.. .�,�,•'-�- .. . . (vfiy'C'omms§'to Lx(Sires r:�r�bs'- ,•• :u, . . .. ' .f�1TC;af'�1dNTANA GQiiiVTF Z-OP:GAL}.fS f}N ) = •.:_.d i (iis. iisy:of'. , 1989.:before the undcnigned Noiary Public f6f tho4tatc b9'1VI'orita'ntt;- M11•!. i .. ';icrsbnallya>;)3crcd 1aY�ictI.Simith;;kn'6un to.tnc to tic licPt[84n''Wfi6c t�ainC l�''SuCizeri6eil io'tltc viit a . «_.:. z,.•,: tnscruttietft:and atnotv[cdged to inc that skit ciecuted thc:taine..' lV W[TN'F.S'S WI`IliR:EGIR,I.has'c•-hcictmto set.my'liiind'arid:d}.Yixud•my Notnr'ial Scal(fie day and yCar :r:• .,Ih:this certificate first above written. p=` Nota'ry:P:utilic:fo' ,th" ttiac'oFN4batu'iia ' ��w�. r iDly Commission f; Pi�c's r ray ::.'fit.;; .:�.�•� 5; ,? L''bFMONTANA r• t;CG;IJNTY OF.GA:LLATIN ) thisday.oF, i7 l9R:fi;:.bcforc ihe:•Uridctsigficd Nbtury�'iihlia for Chc S'ffitc'of(Dfontaria, t ry persryonally appcarcd Do glas Lance Siniili,';1 rrotvfi-,ib'md::to 8 the 60's6n W(iose name N suhscrrbcd`.fo the 4=f`-"i uithtii I" 'i'i ffie'at.and acknow ledge d'to iitic;tli:iC li6tRe tiff d Ait-sainc: :" > ��,rl;��'1}V:9:'1:ilf�l�VI:II:RLiO'F :I'hriv.e licrcuttt'ti sCt'iri hurid-,0id atYixcd my Notariai:$cal the day andyear .;�;::; =irt';i�tj�s,•'CgS��t�td��y�'rtx�,�}iovc avriltcn::;�-•' .,. ._,�f a. w,t n t 'dl r ;, ':�1'ntana w:. • 'l°�r�,: ./''",ivy fY x"'S c a �!��.Ililn���,T•� :! y-, � 'L�-r,•'..._ .. .. ..., Ph �r t ice,;• 'v.:?x`yi.�1'Ow6:.F ,��1^"'' 11 .V411)n11S$1'U'I1:1 'Ior•.,,recocd lh§•.�� t,�dn :ai c osier 19 8.; at.11;'2:1 o'clock"AM_, and:recgrd'6d..in N s� 1TOok !0)3 of MI5d t o}Ttlic�recsirilk 6f:Couriiy of�iellat n;StBic of'Nioniana" �.:. +.. ori-.u�� Seeu4", (:'I:1! Nd) RIrCORD' '[t. Ily a �;; P'RQ] 'CTc;J;ack`Itakbit opiaA J.l,ni;Segme,i kt-V N TO; ` :'`` ;•' ' :briiiis=I)ozemnit'Y(rl kV I`I'it: 140}\lTANA I?ONfiTt COMPANY -- ,�}'. '.. a W:QTtO ; 14'8:2 " ItF:A[:CSTAT•E DGPARTti1tiNT" .:,<Ntir's' 11r[ 4`.If NO 4�}7 [fast 13roudavay ::> J'''MQUIRLTJ 0Y:Joe Sabol Butte,YET 59101•9989 'FmFtr, _ i _ _ - .v :.i. _ ..:r .S'.is',e: ..: ,..r�,i�.':�:,y:�i:;i�a''•'y�'-is:�'�' Xvc �:'a?:'4,�•:t��c: REV����.J SEWER AND WATEROELINE AND ACCESS EASEMIfNT AND R LEN'f Roger 1.1.Smith and Rosalind Smith,of Bozeman,Montana,the GRANTOR(S),in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged,grants)to the City of Bozeman,a municipal corporation of the State of Montana, 411 East Main,Bozeman,MT, 59771-0640,GRANTEE,its successors and assigns,a perpetual easement to lay, construct and maintain a 12" water pipeline with the usual services, valves, connections,accessories and appurtenances for the purpose of transmitting water in,through,and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County,Montana, Thirty(30)feet wide to be located on the following described real property: Lot 5 of Annie Subdivision Plt=11,situated in the SE'/of Section 2, T1S; R5E; P.M.M., City of Bozetrran; Gallatin County, ; Montana. ; The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit"A"which by this reference is made a part hereof. This grant includes Elie right of the GRANTEE;its successors,permittees,licensees,and assigns and its and their agents and employees,to enter at all times upon the aboveAwribed land by using existing roads of trails or otherwise by a route causing the least damage and inconvenience to ttte GRANTORS)in order to survey and establish the route and location of Elie easement and the pipeline and to:-' (1) Construct,operate,patrol,repair,substitute,remove,enlarge,replace,anti maintain the pipeline,services,connections,accessories and appurtenances•, .. (2) -Trim, remove,destroy,or otherwise control any trees anti brusli inside or outside the boundaries of the easement which may,in the opinion of the GRANTEE,interfere or threaten to interfere with or be hazardous to the construction,operation and maintenance of the pipeline, (3) Grade the land subject to this easenent , / (4) Support the pipeline across ravines and,water courses with strictures which deems necessary. c:\w�pth+cs\forms\euett►ent.Gm .. _ • updated 9/97 .. THE GRANTEE AGREES: FILM 1 &W14006 (1) That,in connection with the construction,operating patrolling,repairing,substituting, • removing,enlarging,replacing,and maintaining of said water pipeline(s),it will repair or replace,at its sole expense,or pay to GRANTOR(S)the reasonable value of any damages to growing crops,existing fences,ditches and other appurtenances of said land that may be disturbed by its operation. (2) That,during operations involving excavation,it will remove the topsoil from the trenched area to a depth of ene foot,or to the full depth of the topsoil,whichever is less, and stockpile said top soil for replacement over the trench. It will remove from the site any large rocks or surplus excavating material or any debris that may have been exposed by the excavation and remains after backGlling is completed. And,it will leave the Finished surface in substantially the same condition as existed prior to the beginning of operations except that the surface of backfille'd areas may 6e mounded sufficiently to prevent the formation of depressions after final settlement has taken place. (3) To lay,construct and maintain said pipeline in such manner as will not hinder or prevent the proper cultivation of the tract to which this right of way is hereby granted. THE GRANTORS)AGREES: (1) At no time will they build,construct,erect or maintain any permanent structure within the boundaries of said easement without the prior written consent of GRANTEE. (2) At no time will they modify the finished grade of the land over the pipeline by removal of existing soil or by placement of fill material within the boundaries of said easement without the prior written consent of the GRANTEE. (3) The GRANTOR(S) warrant that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the real property described above,that they have a lawful right to convey the property.or any part of it,and that they will forever defend the title to this property against the claims of all persons. (4) The GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and.privileges herein granted without any interruption by the GRANTOR(S). The terms,covenants and provisions o nhis easement and agreement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs,executors, administrators,personal representatives,successors and assigns of the panics hereto. cAwpdoa\furms\easement.frm' u ted 9/97 pda ;< DATED this day of4� f ILM ? f • Z� 7t5 GR NT R ' DATED this 2,1, day of ,1992. GRANTOR An_20rq STATE OF M*TANA ) (`t1QnC�G )ss. County of Gallatin )' On thi day of , 19 f before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of o-t s nt d ly appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to thi within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHERE Or-,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year above written. (SEAL) TWAS.iFip�p°pk � � Notary Public Eor tlt State of M tan =� • wcb""`�ti n.= Residing at Boz*an,MoXana ly&3 r,Arl242', My Commission Expires STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. County of Gallatin ) On this_day of , 19_,before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within•instrument, and acknowledged to me that lie executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for the State of Montana :Residing at Bozeman,Montana My Commission Expires r.\avpda-sVorms\ewwendim updated 4/9T;... 3 'r • .. ..• .- ., ..:u. - :.:::::ter.,,... .........:. .. .. ACCEPTED: FIN 198?M14008 CITY OF BOZEMAN • by its City Manager TY/ 01 erk of the City Commission STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss: County of Gallatin ) On this day of ,1991before me the undersigned,a Notary Public for the State of Montana, sonally appeared CLARK V.JOHNSON and ROBIN L. SULLIVAN,known to me to be dre City Manager and Clerk of the City Commission for the City of Bozeman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day +1 s And.36first above written. - ----- A, ' . (:EAL) t f V. l�.J OTARY PUB '&FOR THE ITATE OF MONTANA • Residing at -G My Commissio pires !v 914 — c:\vvptlocs\funnskasement.lrm upilatetl 9/97 - - FILM 299rafE EXHIBIT* A • A 3D' WIDE WATER LINE EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN SITUATED NUA A PORTION OF LOT 5 OF ANNIE SUBDIVISION PHASE II LOCATED IN THE SE11/4 OF SECTION 2,'11S., R.5E, P.M.N., GALLATIN SCALE: I'=200' COUNTY, MONTANA AND BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: WACT I ., C.O.S.No. ins ' N 8972'44' E Point of JO.ot' Beginning e-0/14 om or steno/a � ,_jOaSTINa EASEMENT 70 DIE 01Y Of BOZEMAN FOR STREET PURPOSES 30'WIDE WATER LINE EASEMENT ROSE PARK -EMSTING 32.3r WIDE EASEMENT TO R[o1Y OF BOZEMAN .. FOR STREET PURPOSESin - . .... .-,.:.. .. ... .. .... ...._., ., .. ........ .>,.,.......,,.._ -.. .:. 1 o.. at o point heir 16 eoroer' ' 'olSeclion2.said' n Beginning9 D 9 Ihe'C-N1� poinC'-oho Derti§ the soulhwr:l o caner of Troct 1 of Certificate of Wvey Na W.: Thence along The south line of said Troct I N R972*44'I a distance of 30.01 feel; Thence S 0118'43* 111 a distance of 1301,55 feel to a pool on the north Right-of-.ny fine of West Oak Street; Thence along said line S 89100•W a distance of 30.02 feel to a point an the north-south mid section line of said Section 2. Thence along said line N 0118'43'E a dlslance of 1301.64 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said Nate line easement being 0.913 acres or 39.048 Sq.Fl. W LOT 5 r 3 ANNIE SUROMSION PMASI. II • t7 a,z r w WIDE*Ann 0 Y1 IrNE F.ASFMENT ROSE PARK WEST OAK STREET e I"�—[IrrSInNO 32,y WE EASTMENI IO 111E DIVOT BOZEMAN I 10A STREET PURPOSES t0F J tX tOi 4 W. _.. ANNIE SU9DMSION PHASE II � ��� PHASE II I 1 I I OWNERS / ROGER It. At ROSALIND SM1111 392033 EASEMENT AREA CROSS ARFA: 0.896 ACRES IN 39.048 Sq.Tt.. ,. Slits�.Mont., County.o/ GaUnttn. se F1Gnd.}or,r�oord�� 19_12imt 2s48P.M.. and roaoedod In &air 19r, 98 of MISCELLANEOUS page 4005Atim �s i30.00 > h ;CITY .OF BOZENAN .T99a !4 Jan 13 04 05:23p John Dunlap (406)556-1257 P. j Cmade l mim fnc eozW=,MT W-15 �---CascadckHomes, I' Plwne 4 ms�=o Oax 408,55&IM7 Tog .1. � P John Dunlap t Dom Phone, Pagem cc, 13 Urgent. CJ PW Review- E1-Pleum awment ❑abase 40PV. 0 Recloclo, .... ...... . . .:....: ... .. ._. .__ .... .... - ":�'::�: si if,�,F-r3�:.j:, v f�bz'.ui•u:A„'::1`::.?h .... ...... 4a' TD- 31 1 -:w-7 Z.Z Ii�o TQIF 4 z 4a� v L S4 st =-S IX I A L.x, 4,P . ............. ....1111,r JIM I iji, wr r -r V, I DV 16' ads 27, )OW f'!t: TV. A A.. -Laalc :If -9 • P 1 "24-I l, 1A .. : ,