Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300219734742467) tiZ-9110 COLLEGE PARK PROFESSZ'ONAL " CENTER EAST, %LNC CUP - Modi'fation to"Guidelines -1705-1711 W. College 2-5-911 Jim Kack, .Applicant . 4 CD N f e GR.J4-aC-/it4s 7 91 Reorder 22 1/3 1Y o FILE REVIEW SHEET CONDITIONAL. USE PERMITS Application Date: 2-5-91 Staff Member: D. Skelton File Number : Z-9110 Reference Files: File Name: DATE DONE BY ' Staff/Agency Comment Requested : Staff/Agency Comment Deadline: Public Hearing Notice To Chronicle: Publication of Notice In Chronicler Public Hearing Notice Sent to Adjacent Property Owners: Public Hearing Notice Posted : Staff Report Due: ; Staff Report ( packet ) Sent Out: Zoning Commission Meeting : Action : City Commission Meeting : Action : Letter to Application Regarding Decision : b Month Review Due: 18 Month Review Due: Letter of Credit Received : Letter of Credit Released : Final CUP Issued : PROJECT ACTIVITY LOGS BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE Project Name COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST File No. Z-9110 STAFF STAFF CUMULATIVE DATE ACTIVITY PERSON HOURS STAFF TIME z LC)i wT" ►-� \C�c� �n.,� 1 .o Z�4 91 1`�Ty �-/ ►�+ ILA C t;2SN f— At z ��91 I�a-cc, v- J►� I�A.c r -su�a„-r.�� �� +�,,,� �2 Z .z5 I Z -7 91 Wo-rlfE_ of �bbuL 4-1E.Z�Qi�IC� c�A�/E ��/Z �•-75 Z- 8 9l STAFF fit6P�7� +r�.y� ?j co."1S Z�r>/91 hTAFF QE1�Y� f7Av� Z P�."15 Z I I 9F_PJS1T 1�,�5(.►C +J�iCG Z 1�.7� z IZ 91 11 .15 1Z.ZS r� City of Bozeman 01817 Receipt - p C Bozem n, Montana tO 19 Received ofZ�7 VVA, Ck C-,V the sum of for . �� !i� By I i i City of Bozeman 01817 Rece.ipt �.,- p d $ v Bozeman, Montana 19 Received of W,-e—S Y,ca C— the sum of Q , t A. Q i Q_ VL t QIA OY n ---DoN for ,tr , By ,� -4ow PUfAe LL 46' MMWAMP 14 -6 LjP 24 -77 0 -3,400 In 4 4,4�O 4,00 0 ow o vj 64 7 1 0 13 4S ........... LL ST 2,a 56 x rA,.Qj SS 41 .-i4 DATE 7 F4 I BED EV > MT T� KA—L E-_= ro r� %.r . 2 ., F, 'EL 1 1-4 1 iZ>40 leo r- C-T Gin, 2�n ED PLOT FlAN OIL TRACTS1A AND 1B TE R. :ZK 1 E� S19KONAL "'ll"'EN EAS TJ LEGE PAI PRC)F LOCATED IN THE S.W.1/4 OF ISECTION 12, T.2S., Q,5E., P.M.M. CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA TI COLLEGE SUBDIVISION T1SGAASS 37 EXISTING 8' SAMTA12Y SEWER MAIN TRACT 2 55' WIDE UTILITY IN MA 379.75' S.W45'35'W EASEMENT 38 I `)` ((.(/. 39 125.00' 41 �J 40 I ° qc SNO STORAG . Tl T STORM DETENTION POND AR 1 BTOPTM.�O 1 ss - y 1 - � _ I EXIST. MANHOLE ' PROPOSED I 1 N PROPOSED i. - 1 5' WIDE ; RIM 4839.00 I-I/2' WATER j" INVAIN.-4832.29 SERVICE 1 - I; L00% P CONCRETE INV!<OUT-4832.19 SERVICE 0,4 - - SIDEWALK 11 3 00'45'4G` W IN 3 OOr45' E 1 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVING PROPOSED CURB TYP. ' 12' WIDE TELEPHON E I O' EASEMENT 70� EXISTING F IRE HYDRANT - B1N.360-N.E. B0LT-4846.24 ' I o I 1 p Q a 1 I S yyu�, OFFICE BUILDING 3 I I ee9g,i Q iv 42 i Lu 1 TPM I LOT 3 WLOT 2 r to1 1 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWE Z i �-- 1 - SERVICE EASEMENT (PRIVA ) VI J u Q I� NAMIPNSTOr� S INC. 1 1 0 1 N 00'45'35' EE LU Q 9 ��cc�pp I 1 i ¢ 'oo OTC 1,g •-------------r--- -- 41 5/8' REBA12 1 N: V - -- W/CAP / 1 { W w 1 i ,o ' I1 42 1 I Ni NROPOSED STORM O ui I 1 \ I LET J I I U �35 c�IO 111114 FT hPAVED f - O D 1 f0.. W co I. FZ-- PAVERS i (n LOT (57< - I OrPOISWER BOX TING W �--' 1 1 ' -......_EXISTING 14" i' WATER MAIN --- ——— — — W�L 1 -- EXISTING 6' WATER MAIN IS FIRE -- 1 ' 33 - ----- ------- ------------------------- r , r 19 LF 15" STORM DRAIN � w --+r-- ---.—`—� I AT 0.005% —\ - - i I, AT 0. 2SM 1 40i 3.00% I I ti L STORM MANI-IOLE , , ' - EXISTING 15' DRAIN STORM INV.�%20 - -. -- -._.-- ..-_..- .--_ --— -- --.....-- -- -- -- _ _ , - -- -- -� im EXISTING STORM INLET N 00'32'4 ' EXISTING 20' R.C.P. CULVERT N. RIM-4838.98 - _ --_'- - ' N. RIM-4843.80 ---- ----------------------'--- ----- --------- 3 33 348.68'. 3 35 36 37 1 38 39 N00'31'40'=. STD} ' STORM DETENTION POND � - EXISTING MANHOLE - TOP 36.00 �� -- ss ss ss ss-� , SNOW STORAGE - PROPOSED 15' STORM - I I I I . AREA CAS 309 DRAIN PLT 0.0 5 ' ' ------ TRACT A' � � AT oo35z% �30 I I I I EXISTING 8' SANITARY - ------ SEWER MAIN SNOW STORAGE - i ' ----------------- 15' � - I -- 1 r___ ______ 1 WIDE STORM SEWER E AREA. j —""f'---'- ---' -� I' 10 LF 15' STORM CITY MAINTENANCE DRAIN AT 0.0352% - EASEMENT STORM DRAIN I---- ----- N ----- _a I , SITE/PLOT PLAN -- -------, 1 SCALE III = 20'-0" TR.i OF PLAT ON FILM 16 PAGE 1154 I, MASTER PLAN OF TRACTS IA AND IB OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST LOCATED IN THE S.W.I/4 OF SILCTION 12, T. 2 S., R. 5 E., P. M.M. CITY OF BOZEMAN , GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA FOR, JIM KACK APRIL, 1987 © BY: Sanderson/Stewart/Gaston ENGINEERING, INC. i BOZEMAN, MONTANA SCALE : I"= 20' zo 0 o zo ao ` I I } at 0. 9 O m ° r ' n TRA,:,T - - SEE DETAIL .se E Ducn 2721-3 19LF15rSrormD 4y.,P y� -•. ••• / .•• � •, ,€.isrinq MH ... d 4w N— IOLF.15"Stam I/LVE-nre N.89 57 53 E. - /. 268.05' "":,�':�' ' al,n Drain of 00352%' Storm M.H. fention ze• Ir/z"rnx Yw.•ll.Eo ( nd-TOP•35.00 - - faa Storm OenntlOn a ab as . —�� Pond-2 Dn' ._ hp•]Lao Exibfinq M.H. YI" bid �� 9�' d) Im.•]a.s0 gl•n•eeae.e3 SNOW STORAGE _ _ _ _ __ _ d* $' "�Ati Isv.•aul.oa. AREA ropoaad Curb(Typical) ---—- —04% - - - 1 12'Sfm.a10.02/� d�� pro posed Storail.let ya'" wx 4� SNOW STORAGE y� 107 L.F.t2"Srorm Drain 0.02% 105 IF.12'Srorm Drain at 0.01%' „ d 6-W rw. I AREA coo sed Sr«m Inlet sad 6"Water Main I.DB%+ "Ym•36on Idx 12'Tmth I Enclosure F ' 20'-e U IN) I I 3 ( 444rrr y°f t--i—_ Cl; ... M pNMer 'n • Lum T�ire ITyp.l • ]• se d. TRACT A a5 j PROPOSED B NO A at S Drain on Pro o,n IS"Storm 4T 4 ee '������I� R.-eaten S 8 TSOLF at00352%' t 1 I -1 1� M �rr•.r�' PM ed 5 Wid CO JIM --— lad----- ems• 1 I Sidewak(T e.�Yp'C.I) \ I --S;— o 15 WIDE STORM SEWERS CITY MAINTENANCE = EASEMENT Ix I 1 1 a i L����a�e•� a����l z �j Is q TRACTIII I B---- 4 E hth 8 SOnHDrY See. Mal i / 1 z I j J ! L� 1 I z pw..44i3mN 1 in H 1 I aw .� m a 1 O p a ..• E,Isfin Fee O 8 SNOW STORAGE I 7-}� .p rHivdf° rJ)'� 1 n• \ AREA ye•eu4e vtsr ff� O O of - -- C) 1 a Edet 3aniWhySeRe t, - a: ---T-1 e '4 v ; fie• I I__ s `Rbbwt d ay Fire Hydrant 2d WIDE SANITARY SEWER / „ - , j t(' SERVICE EASEMENT(pRr ATE) d S ERD lx.%PE qp , 'Trash 1 / �� !/e'eEBAR Y E,Ibtl 12" (s"1IN8.3a.Ye no wn sb'E° 5.89 48 36 E � 131.B2' l �-/ur 119q s —R�Sro mPOfn \l9.Se rJ I f e/car t tr N m..sesa ea \ i I I �B„'1101 dq .f� .• .. � — � t I LL • 3okSeror 9ary c i y ' Sewer gervlp L— Eantinq MM r.r.�^I'•�� Y•}f�l� f�f�s, ExnN ulWell•t♦---I—e. ,.��r. ��a• �•m "u Yi'MN Proposed I-V2"wont w .L --� 4.;:�_--- �-- -�...`.:•::: .J L.� Jo � Service(rypieal)_ � '. I'•:' �; .��T EXISTING BUILDING m°' Y �� m U) W I'�—s o LL T `I A _ - Nt I-- --1 ItL e1 R p c; J r---- o -- l �L!lScaS J a o us 0 .�. r I rF` `�, Ad -I � s�REorAY STORAGE : I I:' ° .::L— —,� s�::l 'm r , 1 SS'WIDE UTILITY J EASEMENT Proposed 5'Wide Card. �,��� •T Sid (Typical) $ 6 15'WIDE STORM SEWER a COMM •: _ y'1 p Sidewalk d `I ACCESS EASEMENT WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY '''I -- Z - - w• E]Ibting M.H A ,�, x.el••4esaao F a/e'esea� 12 WIDE TELEPHONE EASEMENT 7 O _`.L I 135.00' /cav 131.62' t•', t o-ua.'rme N.89°48'36"W. OT.R T.P. E,IbtlpFnHYdranf -b.. 266.62� ds—e M.I. Edge of Povamen e.M.sso-xLeen.494aE.—e .//SLAP BaP s _--- --w 0 �E]Iarinq l4"Water Mal" "P Existlnq 20"R.C.P� e • • w e -— Culvert -- —�-- ---Cfl1;;L—EGESTREET - - NOTES, GROSS AREA =-2.1431 ACRES... ... __ .. _.._. .. ... ..... _ — GROSS OFFICE SPACE m 18,000 SO.FT. — LEASABLE OFFICE SPACE = 15,300 SO.FT. — 1 CAR PER 250 S0.FT.(LEASABLE) = 62 PARKING SPACES (25%COMPACTS). — PARKING - PHASE 1 9 SPACES PHASE 2 =13 SPACES PHASE 3 =26 SPACES PHASE 4 •II SPACES PHASE 5 •10 SPACES TOTAL a 59 SPACES 83-568 REVISED:7/23/87 . 8/10/87 • ,.Re, RESOLUTION NO. Z-9110 RESOLUTION OF THE BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. Z-9110 FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MODIFY THE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST , A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATED IN A "R-O" (RESIDENTIAL-OFFICE ) DISTRICT BEING TRACTS 1A & 1B OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER EAST LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 12 , T2S, R5E, P. M. M . , CITY OF- BOZEMAN , GALLATIN COUNTY , MONTANA ----------------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS , the City of Bozeman and the Gallatin County Commission have adopted a Master Plan pursuant to 76- 1 -604 , M . C . A . , 1981 ; and WHEREAS , the Bozeman City-County Planning Board has been created by Resolution of the Bozeman City Commission as provided for in Title 76-2-307 , M. C .A . , 1981 , and a jurisdi::tional area created under 76-2-310 , M. C .A .., 1981 ; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board has been designated by the Bozeman City Commission to serve as the Bozeman Zoning Commission ; and WHEREAS , the proposed Conditional Use Permit application has been properly submitted , reviewed , and advertised in accordance with the procedures of Section 18. 52 . 020 , and 18 . 52 . 030 , of the City of Bozeman Zoning Code ; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board held a public hearing on February 19 , 1991 , to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board finds that the application to modify the land use development guidelines would not adversely impact the architectural theme or intent of the planned unit development. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED that the Bozeman City-County Planning Board recommends to the Bozeman City Commission that the application for a Conditional Use Permit to modify the land use development guidelines of College Park Professional Center - East, a planned unit development professional office complex located in a "R-O" ( Residential-Office) District being tracts 1A & 1B College I I r v Park Professional Center East located in the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 12 , T2s , RSE , P.M . M. , City of Bozeman , Gallatin County , Montana, be unconditionally approved . DATED THIS 19th day of February , 1991 . Resolution #Z-9110 . ��tC•^f.�2-cJ Andrew C . Epple , ector Ralph Johnson , President City-County Plannin Office City-County Planning Board a . — 2 — r Continued discussion - request for loan/grant, from the. City's CDBG Revolving Loph` Fund outside target area - Affordable Home Ownership S Management Enterprises X The CityManager reminded h Commission - g the o mission that the motion on this request was ta- bled at last week's meeting, pending adoption of the above resolution. It was moved by Commissioner Swanson, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, that the motion be removed from the table. The motion carried by the following / Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Hawks; those voting No,' none. Clerk of the Commission then read the original motion, , which had been tabled, as follows: It was moved by Commissioner Swanson, seconded .by Commissioner Knapp, that the Commission approve the application for a grant from the Community Development Block Grant Revolving Loan Fund in the approximate amount of $7,200 for two lots in Valley �r C Unit, to be paid as the outstanding semi-annual special improvement district assessments become due and payable, so long as a qualifying Ibw/or moderate-income family owns the property under HOME's program, subject to the concerns raised in the above discussion. Commissioner Swanson noted that forg't ess of the special improvement district balance should be at the rate of 1 /20th per�ye'ar, the same as the rate of forgiveness on the equity of the home. Assistant Planner Arkell noted that in the memo, staff recommended that the special improvement district assessments to b"e paid through the CDBG Revolving Loan Fund are strict) for the existing water, sew Zr and paving improvements, which have ten and Y 9 P 9 P one-half years remaining, and exclude all annual assessments, i.e. , street and tree mainte- nance district assessments. Commissioner Swanson then asked Mayor Hawks if he is satisfied that the qualifying owners of these homes will/have adequate incentive to maintain and keep them attractive. Mayor Hawks sta-ted he feels that the motion as stated provides adequate flexibility for the agreement between HRDC and the purchaser to include some type of sharing of the increased value of the property due to installation of improvements and good maintenance. He then indicated that he is willing to accept any action which HRDC takes to meet the in- tent of this motion, and asked if the other Commissioners agree; they concurred. The Commission then voted on the original motion, with the inclusion of this week's discussion' as/well as last week's, as follows. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote those voting Aye being Commissioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp, Commission- er Goe rung, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Hawks; those voting No, none. Pabfic--hea`rin - Conditional. Use Permit - James W. Kack modifyland use development guidelines. of College Park Profess ---i.onal enterer-East, Tracts 1 A and 1 B, located in they 03-04-91 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA �\ March 4, 1991 Thela`Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission \\ Room, Municipal Building, March 4, 1991 , at 3:30 p.m. Present were Mayor Hawks, Com- missioner Go h\ung, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp, City y Manager Wys\,k\ City Attorney Becker and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting,, was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment.of silence. None of the 'Commissioners requested that any of the Consent Items be removed for discussion. Minutes - Februar\25, 1991 It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the minutes of the regular me\�ing of February 25, 1991 , be approved as amended. The mo- tion carried by the following \Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner \ Goehrung, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp and Mayor Hawks; those voting No, none. Commission Resolution No. 2823 - revisin,g guidelines for budgeting the use of program in- come from the 1984 Community Developmeri,t Block Grant program City Manager Wysocki presented Commission Resolution No. 2823, as reviewed by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2823 A RESOLUTION OF . THE CITY COMMI\SION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, BUDGETING THE USE OF PROGRAM INCOME FROM THE 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. The City Manager reminded the Commission that this resolution was prepared as a result of their direction at last week's meeting. Mayor Hawks asked if all Commissioners are satisfied that these revisions allow the ti latitude desired by the Commission; they responded in the affirmative. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Swanson, that the Commission adopt Commission Resolution No. 2823, revising the guidelines for budgeting the use of program income from the 1984 Community Development\Block Grant program. i The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Ave being Commission- er Frost, Commissioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Go,.ehrung and Mayor Hawks; those voting No, none. 03-04-91 3 �outhwest,one-quarter of Section 12, Town s:hi:p-2_Sou.th_,=Ran e 5 East, Montana Principal- Meridian just east o South 19t venue on West o ege treet This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Conditional Use Per- mit requested by James W. Kack for modification of the land use development guidelines of the College Park 'Professional Center--East, located on Tracts 1 A and 1 B of the College Park Professional Center. The subject site is located in the southwest one-quarter of Sec- tion 12, Township 2 South., Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, and is more com- monly located along the north side of West College- Street, just east of its intersection with South 19th Avenue. Mayor Hawks opened the public hearing. Associate Planner Dave Skelton presented the staff report. He noted that this type of hearing is usually held during the evening' session; however, this hearing was ad- vertised for the 3:30 p.m. session. The Planner then distributed to the Commission two exhibits which were not includ- ed in their packets, the first being a copy of the minutes from the DRB meeting at which this application was considered and the second being a letter of support from the Gallatin Development Corporation, dated February 15, 1991 . The Planner noted that, while the subject property is not located in an entryway overlay corridor, this application was sub- mitted for their expertise in reviewing the proposed architectural modifications. He stated that, while the three members present at that meeting did not have a major concern with the proposed modification of the guidelines, one member did express concern that the orig- inal theme was not being retained. He noted that several letters of support from property owners in that immediate area were included with the staff report, reviewing those letters and the relationship of those properties to the subject site. Planner Skelton stated that this application is essentially for modification of a planned unit development which was originally approved in 1984. He noted that- plan was for a five-phase development, with the phases to be installed in 18-month increments. In 1987, because of the supply and demand for this type of development, the applicant resub- mitted his application for a planned unit development professional office complex, to be constructed under land use development guidelines. He stated that under this process, when a new building is to be constructed, it goes through an in-house review to ensure that the land use develop'inent guidelines are being met prior to issuance of the building permit. The Associate Planner stated that under this appl.ication, Mr. Kack has requested that the following modifications be made: (1 ) that the type of exterior finish on the structures be expanded to include (a) channel siding and (b) shingles; and (2) that dormer treatments be added to the structural options. 03-04-91 - 4 - Planner Skelton stated that the College Park Professional Center--East has been de- veloped in a Western USA theme; and these proposed changes would be in keeping with that theme. He noted that Hamilton Stores has discussed relocating its winter headquar- ters to this location; and these revisions to the land use development guidelines would al- low the review of that application as a minor site plan. He reminded the Commission that this application is for a revision to the guidelines; therefore, discussion must remain at that level and not on a particular building. Planner Skelton stated that, following its public hearing on February 19, 1991 , the City-County Planning Board unanimously recommended unconditional approval of this appli- cation. Associate Planner Skelton stated that Dr. Brian Rogers, who owns the building di- rectly to the east of the subject site, has indicated that he is not in opposition to the pro- posal; however, he is concerned about continuity of the entire project and the potential for losing that through further revisions to the land use development guidelines. He not- ed that Dr. Rogers feels that the remainder of the development should be, done in such a manner that the two existing buildings are an integral part of the planned unit develop- ment. Responding to Commissioner Knapp, the Planner stated that the Hamilton Stores had proposed a looped transportation system through the lot; however, that was not in compli- ance with the guidelines for development within that planned unit development. He noted that Hamilton Stores has since agreed to delete that from their plans. Commissioner Frost indicated that he has not received a copy of the staff report for this item; therefore, he is uncomfortable with taking any action at this meeting. Mr. James W. Kack, applicant, 6531 Jackson Creek Road, indicated a willingness to address questions. Ms. Darla Joyner, Executive Director of the Bozeman Area Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support of the proposed modifications to the land use development guidelines. Mr. Mark Refling, 2618 Spring Creek Drive, stated that he has served as attorney for Hamilton Stores in the past; however, he is not representing that firm at this hearing. He noted that if this application is approved, Hamilton Stores will strongly consider re- locating its winter headquarters from Santa Barbara, California, to Bozeman, Montana, so they will be closer to their operations in Yellowstone Park; and that includes construction of a new building in the College Park Professional Center--East. He noted that if this move is to occur, the building must be completed by September; therefore, construction must begin this month. He then reminded the Commissioners that the neighbors are generally in favor of these requested modifications and urged their approval. No one was present to speak in opposition to the requested Conditional Use Permit. Q3-04-91 - 5 - • Commissioner Goehrung suggested that, since this type of public hearing is usually scheduled for the evening session, this hearing should be continued to that time. He not- ed that any additional testimony could be submitted at that time, and a decision made after the public hearing is closed. Mayor Hawks continued the public hearing until the evening session, since that is the typical time for addressing this type of application. Discussion - possible creation of neighborhood parking district near MSU City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commission that .this item was requested by Commis-sioner Swanson. He then noted that, included in the Commissioners' packets, was a letter/\\tuition, dated November 18, 1990, from many residents of the area just south and east of th\Montana State University campus. Com\\sioner Swanson asked that Assistant to the City Manager Ron Brey provide a brief report 'n\'his assessment of the information received from Missoula, prior to listening to the resident\o\that area. Assistant B'i^ y,\stated that he has reviewed the written information he has received on the Missoula neigho'r�hood parking districts and talked with officials involved in devel- oping that program. H'e ;tated that Missoula found it necessary to have the program ini- tiated by the affected ree jclEents, particularly since streets are public rights-of-way; and the public is entitled to u\ t `hose unless restricted by a district. He further noted that strong resident support is nece\ary because those involved must exclusively bear the ad- ministrative and operational costs, including signage and enforcement, incurred in that district. He then cautioned that \the district must be large enough that parking restric- tions don't push the problem to an adjoining area. Assistant Brey stated it is important that the parking situation be carefully re- viewed, and that any City attempt to address problems be done in concert with MSU offi- cials, after due deliberation. The Assistant cautioned that, in all likelihood, a source other than the Police De- partment will be necessary for enforcement within t.e parking district. He noted that the enforcement mechanism should be identified early in the,, process. Assistant Brey stated that another step that should be taken early in the process is to identify the number of living units in the area and th\�umber of cars for each, so that a determination can be made of whether the .congestion is occurring because of residents or because of MSU related activities. He noted that if it is determined that a substantial number of cars belong to residents of that area, the creation of a neighborhood parking district may not resolve the problems. Assistant to the City Manager Ron Brey then suggested that the three principal 03-04-91 i 6 points of consideration should include: (1 ) creation of a district that includes the entire residential University perimeter, to ensure that the problem is not shifted to another area; (2) conduct a parking study to determine how effective such a mechanism would be in al- leviating the problem; and (3) close cooperation with MSU to relieve the problem. Responding to Commissioner Swanson, Assistant Brey stated that under the interim zoning ordinance, 2.0 to 2.25 off-street parking spaces are required per residential unit. He noted noted that a majority of the apartments in that immediate area do not provide those parking spaces; and. there is a definite unwillingness to tear up lawns to provide those spaces. Responding to questions regarding blanket grandfathering of apartments in that ar- ea for parking purposes, Assistant Brey noted that such grandfathering would not put any more cars on the streets, but it would legitimize the status quo. He noted that such action would freeze the situation, with any future apartment conversions being required to provide the off-street parking spaces. The Assistant cautioned that the down side of blanket grandfathering is that the City would lose its ability to enforce regulations in cases of outstanding abuse. Mr. Bill Rose, Facilities Director at Montana State University, stated it is important . for MSU and the City to work together to address the parking problems. He noted that many of the people who work at MSU, as well as many of the students, are residents of Bozeman. He stated that a substantial amount of data is needed to determine the scope of the problem and how it can best be addressed. He noted that any efforts to address the parking problems in the subject area could impact parking on campus; and the University needs time to adjust to those changes. Mr. Rose then noted that MSU has engaged a parking task force to study parking on and around campus. He noted that within the next few weeks, the results of that. study will be closely reviewed in anticipation of the next step. He indicated that one of the issues is parking along the northeast and east sides of the campus. Mr. Gordon Herwig, 1412 South 5th Avenue, gave a lengthy presentation, in which he .made and reiterated the following points and issues. He noted that the residential ar- eas around the north and east sides of the campus are where the neighborhood parking district is needed, not on the south and west sides. He stated that in the immediate area of South 4th Avenue, South 5th Avenue, West Grant Street and West Hayes Street,. there are many residents who are unable to use the streets. Mr. Herwig stated that area is also the auxiliary parking lot for the University, and those faculty and students who avoid purchasing a parking sticker to park on campus. He stated that because of the solid parking of those vehicles, the City is unable to main- tain those streets like it does in other areas, because it cannot plow the snow to the curb 03-04-91 • - 17 - • :i Commission notify Mr. Billion that he must cease use of the front yard setbacks immediate- ly. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Com- missioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Hawks; those voting No, none. City Manager Wysocki suggested the Commission may wish to set a deadline date for submittal of a comprehensive site plan. Commissioner Frost noted that notice of this violation was given seven months ago. He then expressed an interest in creating as short a realistic time frame as possible for filing of a comprehensive site plan and application for deviations. Associate Planner Skelton suggested that, given the size and intensity of this proj- ect, a comprehensive site plan could be prepared within thirty days. It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Goehrung that the Commission set April 3, 1991 , as the deadline for submittal of a comprehensive site plan for the entire parcel and application for deviations to the entryway overlay district. The motion carried by the following Aye and No .vote: those voting Aye being Commission- er Knapp, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Swanson and Mayor Hawks; those voting No, none. Mayor Hawks asked if legal proceedings will be initiated if the site plan and appli- cation are not submitted by the. deadline; the City Attorney assured the Commission that they will be. ------------ Public hearing (continued) - Conditional Use Permit - James W. Kack - modify land use development guidelines of College Park Professional Center--East, Tracts 1A and 1B, locat- Tr-in:cipal n the southwest one-quarter o erection 12, township 2 South, Range 5 East, old erid.ian_ _just east of outh _19th venue on _est� _olle_geStreet) This was the time and place set for the continued public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit requested by James W. Kack for modification of the land use development guidelines of the College Park Professional Center--East, located on Tracts 1A and 1 B of the College Park Professional Center. The subject site is located in the southwest one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, and is more commonly located along the north side of West College Street, just east of its intersection with South 19th Avenue. Mayor Hawks reopened the continued public hearing. Commissioner Frost stated he has reviewed the staff report and exhibits for this project, and is now prepared to vote on the application. Commissioner Goehrung asked if all development within this planned unit develop- ment must meet or exceed the land use development guidelines; Planner Skelton responded it must. Mayor Hawks closed the public hearing. 03-04-91 • - 18 - 4 It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner, Frost, that the Commission waive the customary one-week waiting period. The motion carried by the fol- lowing Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner. Frost, Commissioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp and Mayor Hawks; those voting No, none. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Swanson, that the Commission unconditionally approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by James W. Kack for modification of the land use development guidelines of the College Park Professional Center--East, located on Tracts 1 A and 1 B of the College Park .Professional Center, as recommended by the City-County Planning Board. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being. Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Swanson, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Goehrung and Mayor Hawks; those voting No, none. Discussion - FYI Items The City Manager presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information" items. Letter of support for KGLT's grant application, as prepared by Commissioner Goehrung. The Commiss oners noted approval and signed the letter of support as prepared. (2) A chart\,showing the area's mountain snowpack as of February 1 , 1991 , as well as the monthly pre p\.tion for January 1991 . (3) Copy of the\\r sent to local legislators inviting them to meet with the CityCommissioners at 6:00 \m,, on Wednesday, p. \ y, just prior to the joint meeting with Missoula. '\ (4) Copy of the letter and questionnaire sent to members of the various advisory boards and commissions, seeking input for th\e, go, al setting process. (5) Minutes of the Senior Center Advisory Board meeting held on January 9, 1991 . �\ (6) Initial listing of Commissioner goals for Fiscal Year 1991-92, dated March 1 , 1991 . A (7) Agenda for the Board of Adjustment meeting to" e held at 1 :30 p.m. on Thursday, March 7. \\;\ (8) Agenda for the City-County Planning Board meeting to, b`e held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 5. (9) Copy of a letter from Glenn H. Lehrer, Associate Professor a 'MSU, to City Manager Wysocki dated February 27, 1991 , thanking members of the City staff for their presentation to the building construction class. 03-04-91 Y • President Johnson stated that the City Commission has release�d�a Request For Proposal (RFP) for the Design Objective ` Plans (D©�R) arid stated that the Planning Board needs to determine its role in the development of the DOP' s. He referred to a memo, dated Januaryi 29, 1991 , from Planning Director Epple to the Board , noting the three options listed . President Johnson stated that the scoping meetings referred to in the memo would consist of hearing from the community at large and the business community to formulate objectives and drawings which will \then be brought before the Planning Board . Keith Swenson stated that the Chamber of Commerce would also like to be a part of those meetangs. Bill Myers stated that he would like the Planning Board to be a part of the hearings and that he prefers option #3. MOTION - It was moved by B-ill Myers, seconded by Kelly Wiseman , to proceed with option " 3 and to appoint the three Planning Board members now serving on�the DRB (President Johnson , Keith Swenson , and Ellen Kreighbaum, )\as the subcommittee to work in selecting the consultant, scoping the project, advising the consultant, and presenting the DOP' s toNBLIlloc,\k , ard for public hearings and action . Keith Swenson stated that everys welcome to participate in the process. In response to a question from Bob Bill Myers stated that appointing the Planning Board members nw on the DRB as the subcommittee would formalize the relationship between the DRB and the Planning Board . The motion on the floor carried by unanimous voice vote. B. TRANSPORTATION PLAN/RFQ -- STATUS REPORT Due to the absence of Planning Director Epple, President Johnson announced that this item will be continued to a later meeting of the Board . ITEM 4. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICATION #P-9110 SUBMITTED BY MR. JAMES W. KACK, OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �TO MODIFY THE .LAND USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOFMENT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATED IN A "R-O" (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE) DISTRICT- � � Planning Board - February 19, 1991 2 Planner Dave Skelton stated- that .several letters in favor of the application were received today and distributed them to the Board for their review. Those letters received were from Robyn Erlenbush, Broker/Owner of ERA Landmark of Bozeman ; James Drummond , President of First Security Bank ; Carl Lehrkind , President of Lehrkind ' s Bottling Co. ; Dennis Schweitzer of Schweitzer Partnership; John McKenna of John McKenna and Associates; and Scott Heck , of Security Title Company. In conclusion of the presentation of the Staff Report , Planner Skelton stated that the Planning Staff recommends approval to the Board of the modifications to the land use development guidelines for College Park Professional Center - East . Planner Skelton stated that DRB member Ron Hess had concerns that the dormer treatment of the proposed Hamilton Stores , Inc . building was not in keeping with the original PUD theme. Keith Swenson stated that the three DRB members reviewing this application. were in agreement that the new proposal could fit well into the new guidelines. In response to a question from Martin Whitmont, Planner Skelton stated that a building could be developed in the PUD that is higher than two-stories as long as the development stays in f tune with the original guidelines and the proposed modifications. In response to a question • from Keith Swenson , Planner Skelton stated that any construction to the north, east, and west of the existing building can have a height of up to 32' high. Responding to a question from Bill Wright, Planner Skelton stated that a site surface drainage plan will be mandatory on the two remaining lots. Responding to a question from Martin Whitmont, Planner Skelton stated that the architectural design of future development within the PUD must be acceptable to the land use development guidelines. In response to a question from President Johnson , Planner Skelton stated that the square footage of the proposed development for Lot 2 of the PUD is less than what was allowed for what was previously Lots 2, 3, and 4. Planner Skelton stated that the square footage of construction on Lot 3 can be no more than 60% of the lot. The Board held discussion of the architectural design and construction of future development within the PUD. In response to a question from President Johnson , Mr. Kack stated that the only changes needed to the existing covenants will be the dormer treatment and the shingles to be used on the fascia. In further Planning Board - February 19, 1991 3 V � • response to President Johnson ' s question , Mr. Kack stated that he would not object if the height of the building constructed on Lot #3 would have a limit of one-story on it. Mr. Kack stated that the plan for Lot #3 is a one-story building but with dormers . I President Johnson OPENED THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING. Dr. Brian Rogers, 2910 Colter Avenue, stated that he is the owner of the building immediately to the west of College Park Professional Center - East. Dr. Rogers stated that he is not before the Board in opposition of the project but to voice his concerns regarding the architectural continuity of. the area. Dr . Rogers stated that the building he is now in will be duplicated on the corner of 19th Avenue and College and he thought there was an understanding that the buildings in College Park Professional Center - East would look the same. He stated that he would like the proposed Hamilton Store building to complement what he has already done and to complement the City. Mark Refling , member of Gallatin Development Corporation (GDC) , read a letter sent to the Planning Office from the GDC urging the Planning Board to approve the amendments to the L .U.D.G. guidelines to College Professional Center - East . Mr. Refling stated that the GDC spends a lot of time, effort, and money to encourage development in the community and feel that Hamilton Stores, Inc . represents all the things that are good for our community. He stated that, although Dr . Rogers has some concerns, the surrounding neighbors that have been contacted feel the development would fit in and have looked upon it favorably. In response to a question from Bill Myers, Planner Skelton stated that the covenants limit development to professional offices. Keith Swenson noted two observations he has made: 1 ) the Board is. looking at the guidelines, not the standards . He stated that the guidelines are flexible and provide the opportunity to do different things; 2) he feels it is important to look at Hamilton Stores in the context of several of the structures surrounding it, not just within the PUD itself . MOTION - It was moved by Bill Myers, seconded by Bob Bullock , to approve Application #Z-9110 as submitted . The motion carried 8-0 with those voting Yes being Martin Whitmont, Keith Swenson , Barb Kapinos, Bill Myers, President Johnson , Bill Wright, Bob Bullock , and Kelly Wiseman ; those voting No being None. Ellen Kreighbaum abstained from voting due to her absence during the hearing . In response to President Johnson ' s question , Mr.- Kack stated that Planning Director Epple has requested that the East entrance be used for construction access. Planner Skelton stated that Planning Board - February 19, 1991 4 I / s this application will be heard before the City Commission on j March 4, 1991 . ITEM 5. COMMUNICATIONS A. QUORUM LETTER TO CITY AND COUNTY ATTORNEYS President Johnson asked if there is anything to report on this item. The secretary stated that no response has been received, from the City or the County Attorney. President Johnson I stated that this agenda item will be continued to a later date I until such time a response has been received . i ITEM b. PLANNING DIRECTOR' S REPORT i A. POSSIBLE REVISIONS TO THE MONTANA SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING ACT President Johnson stated that this agenda item will be continued due to the absence of the Planning Director. t ITEM 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. DRB REPORT Keith Swenson informed the Board of a public hearing held before the Design Review Board that afternoon for the construction of a four-plex . Mr. Swenson stated that the area involved is the same neighborhood in which the Board received a petition at the .February 5, 1991 meeting for a zone change from R-3 to R-3-A. This zone change would make four-plexes a non- permitted use- in the area. Mr. Swenson stated that the DRB recommended to the applicant' s representatives that they work with the neighborhood citizens ' in reaching some sort of agreeable I compromise. i President Johnson stated that the DRB denied the Certificate of Appropriateness based on aesthetics in the Conservation District , and denied the Minor Site Plan application based on proportions, location of the property access to parking , and orientation of the building . President Johnson stated that if either party feels this action to be inappropriate, they can appeal to the Planning Board , which would look at the Minor Site Plan only. If necessary, their next level of appeal would be to the City Commission . I Planning Board - February 19, 1991 5 � i BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD STAFF REPORT ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM: ZONING APPLICATION NO. Z-9110 -- AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MODIFY THE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATED IN A "R-0" (RESIDENTIAL-OFFICE) DISTRICT APPLICANT: MR. JAMES W. KACK 6531 JACKSON CREEK ROAD BOZEMAN, MONTANA DATE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19 , 1991 , AT 7 : 00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN STREET , BOZEMAN , MONTANA I REPORT BY: BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING STAFF -------------------------------------------------------------- Location/Description The property in question is identified as the amended plat of College Park Professional Center - East (A P. U. D. ) being Tracts 1A & 1B of College Park Professional Center East located in the Southwest 1 /4 of Section 12 , T2S, R5E, P.M.M. , City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. It is more commonly described as 1711 West College Street and is just south of the Law and Justice Center. Please refer to the location map below. = i 3 T R„ COUNTS 71 LAW AND JUSTICE 4 ; ... BUILDING 1 - - - - - C.U.P. Li _J UrQUQAIL I Apvligatiion tiv Proposal The applicant, Mr . James Kack , is proposing to modify the Land Use Development Guidelines for an previously approved five-phase professional office planned unit development (P. U. D. ) . The modifications that the applicant is requesting are intended to maintain the existing "western theme" of architecture; however, the applicant wishes to expand on the architectural treatment of future buildings in the development. Background In February of 1984, a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development was granted the applicant to develop a professional office complex on the subject property. At that time, the first structure was completed and referred to as Phase I on the master plan of the planned unit development (See Exhibit "A" ) . The planned unit development was approved with five phases of development, each occurring in 18-month increments. Thus, requiring a completion of the remaining four phases by 1990. Because of economic conditions and the developer' s absence from the Bozeman area, the applicant was unable to maintain the 18- month scheduling of each subsequent phase. As a result, in May of 1987 , the applicant made application for a Conditional Use Permit to develop a professional office planned unit development using Land Use Development Guidelines. Approval of the P.U. D. with Land Use Development Guidelines offered the developer more flexibility in that he was no longer committed to complete each phase within 18-months of one another. Instead , the developer would be allowed to construct each phase based upon a indefinite time schedule by receiving in-house summary review and approval by the Planning Director. This would eliminate review of each phase through the public hearing process for each phase. The ability of the developer to receive in-house summary review and approval by the Planning Director relied upon the submittal of Land Use Development Guidelines that would setforth the review criteria of each phase. The Planning Office and Planning Director would review each phase against the guidelines previously approved by the Bozeman City Commission, and if in fact each phase satisfied the criteria of the L. U. D.G. ( Land Use Development Guidelines) , the project would be conditionally approved. P.U.D. Master Plan The planned unit development approved in 1984 included a master plan of the development which incorporated adjacent property owned by Dr. Brain Rogers. The two developers, Mr . James Kack and 2 Dr. Brain Rogers , proposed two individual planned unit developments at the same time with the intent of maintaining a design theme that allowed the two projects to be compatiable. Thus , the two existing structures (the west building owned by Dr. Rogers and the east building owned by Mr. Kack) are very similar in design . However, it should be made clear that the two projects, although complimentary to one another, are two seperate planned unit developments. The five-phase P.U. D. proposed by Mr. Kack currently uses the same egress/ingress as the two-phase P. U. D. by Dr. Rogers, but beyond the shared access, access improvements and similar design, the two P. U . D. 's are incidental of one another. LAND USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES - L.U.D.G. The intent of the applicant, Mr. James Kack , to develop the L. U. D.G. was to acquire flexibility in the construction of each phase by supplementing the Bozeman Area Zone Code and the protective covenants of the planned unit development approved in 1984. The L . U. D.G. are intended to clarify the developer' s intentions of developing the property while satisfying the intent of the "R-O" (Residential-Office) district. Compatibility with the surrounding area, both residential and commercial , was essential in developing the L.U. D.G. of the planned unit development. (Please refer to the attached copy of L.U. D.G. ) The intent of the "R-O" district in 1984 was to provide for and encourage the development of professional offices, business headquarters, and compatible multifamily and apartment development that would blend well with adjacent land uses. Although the permitted uses listed in the 1984 zone code included medical clinics, apartments and multi-family dwellings, churches, efficiency units and fire stations, the applicant has specifically not listed them as permitted uses in the L . U . D.G. 's for the planned unit development. It is the intent of the applicant to concentrate strictly on developing professional offices and businesses on the said property. Modification of C.U.P. and L.U.D.G. In November of 1990, the applicant requested modifications to the approved planned unit development and L.U . D.G. which modified the form of property ownership, the building configuration of the P. U. D. , and number of building floors (Please refer to Exhibit "B" letter from James Kack dated October 30 , 1990 ) . At the request of the Planning Director, the D.R. B. (Design Review Board) of the City of Bozeman evaluated the proposed revisions, and unanimously concluded that the requested modifications would not change the character of the P. U . D. or alter the intent of the development guidelines. As a result, the Planning Director granted in-house summary review of the modifications requested by the applicant. Modification of Design Theme for L.U.D.G. 3 As noted earlier, the applicant is requesting to modify the Design Theme of the Land Use Development Guidelines ( L. U. D.G. ) for the planned unit development. The intent of the developer is to expand on the treatment of architectural elements while maintaining the "western U. S. " theme already established in the guidelines. As noted on page #6 of the L. U. D.G. , (Exhibit "C" ) the architectural elements that the applicant wishes to add include channel wood siding and cedar shingles on the facade treatment of the buildings, in addition to dormer treatment of the facades. The applicant has attached sketches to the L .U. D.G. which reflect the architectural elements that he wishes to expand on. The applicant also wishes to modify the low-profile ranch style theme to allow for two-story structures as part of the P. U. D. Mr. Kack is in the opinion that two-story structures situated at a maximum distance from West College Street, in addition to the lower grade elevation at the north end of the property , would not visually impact the P. U. D. or surrounding area. The "R-O" district allows for two-story structures that do not exceed a building height of thirty-two (32 ) feet. Thus, the applicant' s request would be in keeping with the regulatory standards of the "R-O" district if the buildings do not exceed thirty-two (32 ) feet in height. The Planning Office and Bozeman City-County Planning Board , in the past twelve months, have considered a variety of professional office and commercial business proposals in the surrounding area of South 19th Avenue and West College Street. Some of those projects include ERA Landmark Center (Ken LeClair) , First Security Bank of Bozeman , Drive-in Facility and Security Title Professional Office (Scott Heck) . This suggests that the "R- 0" designation of the area has effectively recognized the demand for the surrounding area to develop as professional offices and businesses . The applicants proposed modification to the L.U . D.G. does not suggest any deviation from the regulatory standards of the "R-O" district. Furthermore, it is in keeping with the development that has recently occurred or is proposed to develop in the surrounding area. The Bozeman City-County Planning Staff has reviewed the architectural elements which the applicant proposes to introduce into the L. U. D.G. for the planned unit development, and generally is in the opinion that they do not obtrusively impact the development. However, the Planning Staff has requested the Design Review Board review the proposal and provide comment to the Planning Board . Comments from the Design Review Board will be forth coming for review by the Planning Board at Tuesday's public hearing . 4 Public Opinion The Planning Office has received correspondence from an adjacent property owner, Dr. Brain Rogers, who is sensitive to the modifications requested by the applicant. Dr. Rogers' overwhelming concern is the lack of a guarantee of architectural continuity between the proposed buildings and the two existing buildings (Please refer to the attached letter dated October 29 , 1991 - Exhibit "D" ) . Dr . Brain Rogers is the owner of the office building directly west of the similar professional office building constructed by Mr. Kack. Conclusion The Bozeman City-County Planning Office has reviewed the application by Mr. James Kack to modify the land use development guidelines for College Park Professional Center - East, a professional office planned unit development, and as a result have found that the modifications would comply with the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Update, the Bozeman Interim Zone Code, and the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations. The Planning Staff is in the opinion that the modifications to the land use development guidelines would not adversely impact the planned unit development, the surrounding area, or the "street scape" of West College Street. Furthermore, that the architectural elements proposed by the applicant is in keeping with the "western U. S. " theme setforth by the developer with the original P. U . D. Therefore, the Bozeman City-County Planning Office recommends to the Bozeman City-County Planning Board approval of the modifications to the land use development guidelines for College Park Professional Center - East. i I 5 EXHIBIT "A" MASTER PLAN OF TRACTS IA AND IS OF COLLEGE PAHK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST LOCATED IN THE S.W.I/4 OF SECTION 12, T,2 S., R.5 E., P.M.M. CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA FOR- JIM KACK APRIL. 1967 BYE SonArrrw/Shsorl/6bilow ENOINEERINB,INC. BOZEMAN. MONTANA SCALE) 1'•20' m .... S. 69E TRACT etc DETAIL .• •gyp `•�� pp c ae. � nEl-r -N a°L.•':r r ' 'N'. • N.B9 S7 S! E. 268.05 �•:b�6 ...-_ ' '—. "•i�. =AmrecNlrslm�l��—_�-1 ` _—_ _ \ C..JJJ�� \ .a 1.�: - :•wotZ' —..w e m rR'fs. — o:l nms a:.w 'emu?)w rW, o" `• Imo( y sa am+.at s• i '. 'e.�� i J nrr.•. TRACT A I / t / VNOPOBED BUICOINY-60 ,. - I i `•�'; ' �'i TRACT 1$ II Pi M• ` Y A, It E J _(sr`•.'�.°. 'r �� '.('-//' '' ���.1� / .' � I.eTM M E , ol.e:' j � `� A. 71 ' ;..•.",ice \ 1 I Y a• =1_J _1_I I I I I IIe`(.I i"L'...^ I.r�_Z _....» o m I.r{,T�J Ly j28/ J EXISTING BUILDING i/ `�':I o �1 Ire I �q T'1 ;`� An go I 3; i I L11J011 -- �- / r GO GO r+ua» •� t'ru'arrmu,. )I ter• �O .f+..yr for ar !r I 2 .e•Waa»r%nl0•l!.[r�—, , l�_�_ I I O IM-II — J. u`':L•.:e-� � I'/ � u.tR rtLn•wlN raalEn T 'I_`-- ° N.89•�8'38•W. --- __ u:::.-•--'�--266.82'_: .a.l_`-".°r_ -- u.arr- 31-•- --11 -- — — — — —� - COLLEsE MEET---- - —' ..-- --I-- -- —NOTES- - OROS5 AREA 2.1431 ACRES — OROSS OFFICE SPACE • Ie,000 SO.FT. — LEASABLE OFFICE SPICE• 15.300 SO.FT. I CAR PER 230 50.FT.(LEASABLE 1 •e2 PAPKInO SICCCC (2S%CO WP . ). PARR IRO Ali Tn14• lAllf Kwfla t/t)Ar I' roan I I EXHIBIT "B" James W. Kack James Jackson Creek Road Bozeman, Montana 59715 Oct. 30, 1990 Mr. Andy Epple, Planning Director City of Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59715 Dear Andy: Per my letter to you of Oct. 9, and our subsequent meetings thereon, I am requesting the following modifications to the Conditional Use Permit..and Land Use Development Guideline that were issued for College Park Professional Center - East: 1. The form of ownership of the project will be changed from that of a condominium association, to that of a minor subdivision, wherein the three property owners will have individually deeded parcels, plus an undivided interest in the common areas. All owners, of course, will be bound by the By-Laws of the association, and be responsible for the maintenance of the common areas. 2. I am requesting the approved number of office buildings be reduced from "up to five'.'; to three. Also in this regard, the building in the approximate north one-half of the total project will be a two story building, the footprint of which will be under 7,000 sq. ft. . Please know the basic concept of the office park, intended use, zoning, infra-structure, etc. all remains the same as originally approved. Also, as it is the intent of the owners of the now un-developed parcel(s) of the project to submit building plans to the city for review leading to a construction date of spring 1991, this minor subdivision would be totally completed by the end of 1991. Thank you for your review of these proposed amendments/minor modifications, and for the;.-courtesy and consideration you have given me. Sincerely, James W. Kack Att. Revised Site Plan, building elevations . • OXHIBIT "C" exterior stain colors, minor landscape plan and si.gnage modifications will be reviewed by the CPPC-East Architectual Committee along with the Planning Director, and accepted or rejected thereby. Major modifications, such as change in archi.tectual theme, changes in traffic flow or ingress- egress, or land use (as allowed in the total R-0 code,) must be reviewed through the Conditional Use or Planned Unit Developmental Process. This "mini" office park is designed to create its own environment. It is expected the tenant mix will not generate a high traffic flow. The buildings will be .of a "western-U.S." feel . Building Design Considerations that set forth the Architectual theme of the P.U.D. . 1. Exterior colors of earthtones. 2. Rough sawn siding of board on batten, board on board, grooved panelling, channel siding, and shingles. 3. Moss rock or fieldstone wainscoat or accent. 4. Exposed beams where structurally aDDropriate. 5. Substantial eves, gabled ends, and dormer treatments. Building Design Considerations NOT allowed: 1. Metal or Plastic sidings to buildings. 2. Stucco or exposed concrete block where those materials comprise over 15% of the exterior siding surface. 3. Architecture that reflects "period styling" (as colonial, modernistic steel and glass domes, etc. ) 4. Use of pastel or bright colors on other than "detailing" trim. 5. Signs or building identification other than that approved by the ,GPPC-East Board of Directors. Those Site Plan designs/considerations to be met: 1. Ease of occupants and visitors access from parking areas to buildings. 2. Maintaining parking around perimeter of development to allow for most aesthetic use of interior "courtyard" effect. 3. "Convenient and safe vehicular circulation. 4. An office environment that is attractive due to its parklike appearance and architectual interest. 5. A combination of construction and landscaping that enhances the value of all property :within CPPC-East.. .. 6 • • EXHIBIT I'D" DERMATOLOGY - DIPLOMATE AMERICAN BOARD OF DERMATOLOGY AND AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE ALLERGY P. BRIAN ROGERS, M.D., P.S. October 29, 1990 1727 WEST COLLEGE BOZEMAN. MONTANA 59715 TELEPHONE (406) S87-4432 Mr. Andy Epple, Planning Director City of..Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59715 Dear Mr. Epple: I own the medical building immediately west of the proposed College Park Professional Center as well as the corner of 19th and College. I have reviewed the proposed amended site plan for College Park Professional Center-East, as well as the proposed elevations for the proposed Hamilton Stores Inc. office building, the Kack office building, and all of the landscape plans. When Mr. Kack and I received city approval for the College Park Professional Center development in 1984, there was a provision in which minor modifications of the plan .could be allowed without going through hearings and a formal review. I see that the proposed modification has reduced the number of buildings, greatly increased the size of one building, but the total square footage .of office space is actually somewhat less. My overwhelming concern is the lack of a guarantee of architectural continuity between the proposed buildings and the two existing buildings. It was not clear from the preliminary elevations I reviewed that such continuity will be achieved. In reviewing the landscape plans, I have concerns over the proposed paving-block driveway immediately south of the Hamilton Store building. Grass growing up between paving blocks is not in keeping with the landscape theme of the two existing buildings. These areas would be better utilized as a common park-like open space for occupants of the three adjacent buildings. I have spoken with Mr. Kack regarding several items of mutual interest. He has assured me that once construction begins, the eastern entrance into the development will handle virtually all of the construction traffic. I would like the city to make this construction traffic restriction a condition of*approval for the project. This will allow Mr. McKenna and I to conduct business as usual using the present western entrance into the development. In my opinion, the two existing buildings in College Park Professional Center represent Bozeman's finest example of quality, private development within the city limits. Mr. Kack, Mr. McKenna, and myself have gone to considerable expense to construct attractive office buildings, to provide actually more parking than the city requires, and to tastefully landscape the grounds. If my concerns voiced above can be satisfactorily addressed, I would like the city to approve the proposed amendment to the original site plan. Sincerely yours, ,4 P. Brian Rogers, M.D. PBR/jw o a ftV , ,��! (SECURITY TITLE COMPANY OF GALLATIN COUNTY ❑ 0 February 19, 1991 To: Members of the Bozeman City-County Planning Board Unfortunately I have a scheduling conflict that prohibits my attendance at tonight' s hearing. Even so, let me encourage you to approve the modification of the Land Use Development Guidelines for the College Park Professional Center - East. As a neighboring property owner, I am fully aware that the modification will then allow for the construction of the Hamilton Stores new office building. . After reviewing both the site and elevation plans, I believe their effort will do nothing but to further enhance the area. Since ly, 1 L Scott Heck JSH/BH "Title Pecords Maintained (Since 1869" Post Office Box 6550 • 12 North 3rd • Bozeman. Montana 59715 • 406/586-1319 .Ion J.. McKenna, and Associate ''1;` =' = � INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS Life, Health,Disability ; Group Insurance Annuities, Pension Plans i February 19, 1991 Mr. Andy Epple City Planning Director City of; Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59715. ' Dear Andy: I am writing in regard to the proposed amendments to the land use development guidelines that involve Mr. Jim Kack's piece of property on College St. As you may know, I am part of the College Park Professional Center East P.U.D. . I have taken a good deal of time to not only review these changes but to discuss them with Mr. Kack as well as other interested parties. I am obviously concerned about the long term nature of the area. With all this in mind, I feel comfortable with the changes being requested. Furthermore, I have had an opportunity to review the elevations, as well as floor plans on the proposed Hamilton Stores Building; 'and I find it acceptable from my viewpoint. I would welcome any questions you may have, and hope that you would feel free to call if there is anything I might help you with. Thank you for your time. Sincerely yours, HN J. M KENNA D :0/- JohCIATES cj"—, J. M Ke na, CL � , ChFC J :csm 1711 W College St. Bozeman, Montana 59715 • (406)587-5166 Montana 1-800-321-2903 Fax(406)587-6336 FD� February 19, 1991 Mr. Andrew C. Epple Bozeman City-County Planning Office 35 North Bozeman Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Dear Mr. Epple: James Kack came to see me regarding, the construction of a 12,069 square foot building by Hamilton Stores. This building, as you know, would be located just west of our property, the Sherwood Apartments. In our opinion, the proposed building is attractive and we would be in support of this development as proposed. Sincerely, Dennis R. Schweitzer Managing Partner Schweitzer Partnership DS/po I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR MODIFICATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public hearings to be held before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board on Tuesday, February 19, 1991 , at 7:00 P.M. in the Commission Meeting Room of Bozeman City Hall , 411 East Main Street, Bozeman , Montana, and before the Bozeman City Commission on Monday, March 4, 1991 , at 3:30 P.M. in the Commission Meeting Room of Bozeman City Hall , 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. Said public hearings are scheduled to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit by James W. Kack, 6531 Jackson Creek Road , Bozeman, Montana 59715 pursuant to the requirements of the Bozeman Interim Zone Code. Said Conditional Use Permit would allow the applicant to modify the Land Use Development Guidelines for College Park Professional Center - East, a planned unit development professional office complex located at 1711 West College Street. Testimony will be taken at the public hearings. Maps and related data of the area under consideration may be reviewed in the offices of the Bozeman City-County Planning Office, 35 North Bozeman Avenue, Bozeman , Montana, 586-3321 , Ext. 227 . Andrew C. Epple Planning Director B 2 T � I �_ i S Y: 7� �•I - + PLI-T "L r J l l- ;.` ' • II ;- C.U.P. J Application I - ii Lehrkind'a Cocala Bottling Co. 1715 North Rouse/P.0411111&399 _ Bozeman,Montana 59715 RD U 0 February 18, 1991 To Members of the Bozeman City-County Planning Board I urge you to approve the amendments to the "Land Use Development Guidelines" for the College Park Professional Center East. Your approval of these amendments, submitted by Jim Kack, will allow plans for the construction of Hamilton Stores' new office building to proceed without delay. Hamilton Stores' expansion is a significant additional investment in i our community, and I'am pleased to be able to support these amendments i so that the project can go forward. Sincerely, Carl Lehrkind President 0 ® MM O REALTOR® bVU� o.roepux giro. I�Ljj -/4 February is, 1991 Mr. Andrew C. Epple Bozeman City County Planning Board P.O. Box 640 Bozeman, MT 59715 Dear Mr. Epple: This letter is written in support of the amendments to the "Land Use Development Guidelines for College Park Professional Center- East" as submitted by developer Jim Kack. As an owner of a building in the Landmark Center, I feel Mr. Kack's architectural plans will be congruent with the surrounding structures and so support the construction of Hamilton Stores, Inc. 7s office building as proposed in College Park Professional Center-East. 4ly, L`. te ntb u s h Broker/Owner RLE/sah fEBozernan, RA° LANDMARK OF BOZEMAN 805 West Dickerson #1 MT 59715 406-586-1321 FAX: 406-586-4946 ach office independently owned and operated. First Security Bank 1%0000� of Bozeman P.O. Box 910 Bozeman, MT 59771-0910 • 406-587-0641 February 15, 1991 Andy Epple City County Planning Office 35 North Bozeman P.O. Box 640 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Hamilton Stores Building on West College Street Dear Andy: As an adjacent property owner to the proposed Hamilton Stores building, First Security Bank of Bozeman wholeheartedly supports the amendments to the land use development guidelines and construction of the facility. I have reviewed the plans for the proposed structure and believe it will be appropriate for the area and harmonious with the South 19th drive up bank facility recently approved by the city commission. Sinc rely, JAME W. DRUMMOND JWD/lb G A L L A T I N DEVELOPMENT n �- W CORPORATION BOZEMAN, MONTANA February 15, 1991 To Members of the Bozeman City-County Planning Board As you know, the mission of Gaiiattin Development Corporation is �o "support economic development which complements and enhances our natural, educational, and human resources." Hamilton Stores, Inc. is an organization which has clearly demonstrated that it meets these criteria, and we are fortunate to have them located in this community. Hamilton Stores' expansion presents an opportunity for increased employment opportunities along with significant additional investment in the community. In order that plans for the construction of Hamilton Stores' new office building in the College Park Professional Center East may proceed, we urge you to approve the amendments to the "Land Use Development Guidelines" submitted by Jim Kack, the developer of the College Park center. Because GDC's annual meeting is scheduled at the same time as your meeting, I am unable to be present to speak to this issue, but I thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dick Harte President Gallatin Development Corporation DH/sbt 321 East Main, Suite 413 Bozeman, Montana 59715 (406) 587-3113 �.______ �t�_S-�..�C���c.twv�da�o=v�_dnot,,.i_��.�..lna�n..._. ..�►�1_..��' __�___� ��o� ��,►,�:�-- Cam°�..��;_�, h�..�s .��f� ���_ b"ccac ._ �v�e��__�__- ca `ea�n_f 3u,�►_�u��.������.,etcLtrro�,..0_�_� .�o�G��c Vic,. 47 I l f i I 1 . 11 r� ++ I +4 I _t-4_ _ r•t Dooig$ Howiow Board - Fo6ruary' 12, 1001 DRB members present, Keith Swenson, Ron Hess, and Linda Bell - College Park Professional Center - Conditional Use permit application to modify the guidelines for architectural treatment in the development. Initial Week Review - Jim Kack, the applicant, was present. Dave Skelton and Jim Kack summarized the proposed changes to the architectural guidelines. Jim stated that his guidelines were designed not as hard rules but were intended to describe the "types" of things that would be aceptable. Jim emphasized that he was not looking for approval for a specific building, only for approval to modify the guidelines. Keith questioned whether the DRB would object to the changes if the building exemplifying the proposed changes had not.been before the Board already. Ron commented that he would prefer that the guidelines be eliminated altogether. Jim stated that, regarding Brian Rogers' concerns, Brian was never a party to the architectural guidelines. Linda stated that she is not in favor of guidelines adding that the proposed changes are different in style from the existing buildings. Keith noted that is the owner/developer's prerogative to change the covenents he wrote. Ron and Linda agreed. Ron noted that he is concerned because of Brian's concern. Jim reiterated that the guidelines were written after the first two buildings were constructed and were for Jim's benefit. Linda stated that she had no problem approving the change. Ron agreed but commented that perhaps it was not a change for the better. ,I 4' J W.James Kack 6531 Jackson Creek Road Bozeman, Montana 59715 Feb. 4, 1991 COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST (CPPC-East) is designed to be a setting of office buildings of a western U.S. theme or character that utilizes open space in excess of that required by local regulations. The land utilization is designed to maximize the use of this open space for the visual and practical use of the owners of buildings within CPPC-East. The extensive landscaping is also intended to enhance the effect of this open space. In addition, the visual effect of the topography should be noted in its relationship to the design of the buildings. A substantial change in elevation occurs from College Street to the north side of the property, thus facilitating an increase in building height on the northernmost building site without the change of scale that would occur closer to the street, such as reflected in the adjacent apartment building. It is hoped this arrangement of two single story, and one two story office buildings, reflecting similar exterior materials yet individual character, will produce an appealing park-like setting. of Vublication o IC STATE OF MONTANA, 'S '� ; County of Gallatin, } ss. Vivie Portnell ,being duly sworn, deposes and says:That She is Principal Clerk of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle,a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Bozeman,Gallatin County,Montana;and that the notice hereunto annexed( Notice of Public Hearings for Modification of a Conditional Use Permit - James W. Kack has been correctly published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said pape for 1 oomsc�iva insertion, ,the first of which publica on was ad e on the 4th day of February 19 91 , and the last on the 4th day Febr ary jq 91 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4th day February 19 91 Notary Public for the State of Montana,residing at Bozeman,Montana NOTARY PIiBUC for the Shate of MOMM Residing at Bozeman,Montana My Commission expires July 6,190 18 BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE,Monday,February 4, 1991 Bushla'u' ded forplan to ive,, states noneCops seeksu lieny pp • WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic and The $15•,.billion is what we're estimating is. of deadl e Republican governors today praised President: Ol the most_likely"numberwe can:get,'.',he said 2' y ®in ny a feW hOUrs before going t0 Bush's 'plan' to transfer billions of dollars in he emerged from the closed meeting. "If all 22 domestic programs to the states, but expressed the.White House-for,a meeting (billion dollars) are,accepted, that's fine. If the, g g g � governors come u with. another 10 billion concern about whether Congress would o along. With BUSK the OVernOfS 83W-hi8 g P NEW YORK (AP) - A police was first sold Friday in an area of g "I think the president is sincere in terms of (dollars) they want to'add to that to make it32, dragnet today:.was seeking the the Bronx known as a drug bazaar list of $22 billion in proposed ' happier.'!,', supplier of a deadly heroin laced and magnet for out-of-state buy- wanting to give that degree of flexibility: to the „ we'll even be , states, Democratic Gov. Douglas" Wilder of block grant programs In the new. with a powerful tranquilizer that ers: �, Gov. Pete Wilson, R-Calif., a former senator, killed 12 people over the week- Five people have died in New, inia��saido onmABCThe S question Good now ins-,federal budget. ' also appeared on ':`Good Morning America" and end. York,five in New Jersey and two whetAmeher Congress will o aloe a with-it." 9 ge; P stressed that "we have to mans Congress Police in Connecticut, New in Connecticut since Friday. More, g g g doesn't. But typically, Congress ... likes :th Only a few hours before going to the White micromana..York and New Jersey on Sunday than 100 people were taken to � � ge• - House for a meeting with Bush, the governors who "is chairman of the "National Governors " cruised drug-plagued neighbor hospitals in the tri-state area. saw his list of$22 billion in proposed block grant Association,said.on the NBC"Today" show that He added. that "Congress can `hold u's hoods to warn heroin addicts by Authorities said preliminary �. But- loudspeaker to avoid"Tango and tests show the heroin contained a' Programs in the new federal budget.In proposing ,the Bush plan was ,very attractive but added accountable. We. don't`object.to that. But 1v1 Cash" the brand name marked type of fentanyl, a powerful . the transfer,Bush suggested that the federal and that"It'll take a'lot of work with Congress to get don't want them telling,us how to" manage. ;. state governments could agree on about $15 _that accomplished." on packages of the lethal narcotic. tranquilizer used in surgery..Un- Democrat„ Jim Edgar of Illinois said that if the billion in programs from that list. He likened the White House approach.to .a" „ They told people to seek medi- derground chemists use it seeking The proposed grants were in five' areas: car`salesman saying,take the car, drive it for a Proposal is enacted, we realize we've got't9 cal help immediately if they had to`create synthetic heroin: keep going backAo Congress and make sure they $1.45 billion in education; $L025 billion in couple of months.. If you don't like it, give it taken the drug but as word of the City Health. Commissioner Environmental Protection Agency construction back." " don't forget,those programs. But he said the danger spread,police said at least Woodrow Myers said preliminary rants $11.44 billion in welfare, social services At a meeting with "overnors Sunda White .- Plan "gives us a lot,better ability to manage our one dealer simply `changed` the tests indicated the heroin was g ' g g Y own responsibilities , name and continued to seii it. laced with methyl fentanyl, which and energy assistance to low income families; House staff chief John Sununu,.himself a former Officer Scott' Bloch a city k $7.88 billion for housing and community develop- ; governor"of New;Hampshire, emphasized. that , The budget message.'said the,turnover �bf x makes heroin 27; times' more ment programs; and $391 million for law the list was just a working document and that the programs "allows the federal government to police spokesman, said the drug potent. enforcement assistance. president would welcome suggestionsfrom the reduce overhead.It allows the s es to manage\ Gov. Booth Gardner, a Washington Democrat states. pool.,of financial resources' a flexibly." Seven di i collision ofplane �'s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR OSCEOLA, Wis. (AP) - Amid- while no one apparently saw the said one victim Was from Osceola MODIFICATION .OF A CONDITIONAL`USE PERMIT day crash of two small planes left crash about one mile south of this-' and the other six, including the two NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public hearings to be held seven people dead including five rural community's airport, people men. in the Piper, were from the before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board on Tuesday,_ — P P g Y P P P B 2 T J � t ; members of\ sky-diving club, in an heard it and firefighters arrived Twin Cities area. February;l9, 1991 at 7:OOpm in the Commission Meeting Room I 'R�,'�:-1 of Bozeman City Hall,411 East Main Street, Bozeman;Montana, accident apparently unseen by any almost immediately. witnesses. How the two planes collided was Bob Borner, a member of the St." and before the Bozemah City Commission on Monday, March 4,. i y i r y 1 err Croix Valley Skydivers .Club, said 1991 at 3:30pm in the.Commission Meeting Room of Bozeman r ! A The Cessna 182 had five sky not immediately known. The airport the flight of sky divers included four City Hall,411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana." x divers on board when it collided has no control tower:known., e-Cessna men and one woman. Said public hearings are"scheduled to consider an application early afternoon Sunday with a Piper apparently was attempting"to land at Debbie Quist of Osceola said her for a Conditional Use Permit by James W. Kack, 6531 Jackson = i airplane in which two people were the airport, the Milwaukee Sentinel Creek Road, Bozeman, Montana 59715 pursuant to the require-.." PL1-T:` Lit ;�r_' husband Jon, was among them. flying. No one survived, officials said today. Where the Piper's flight "They were headed out to do fun ments of the Bozeman Interim. Code.Said Conditional Use said. originated was not immediately Permit would allow the applicant to modify the Land Use The planes apparently "just known. jumping, Mrs. Quist said. Development Guidelines,for College Park Professionalline - crumpled together and fell," said Investigtors' from the Federal Bodies were scattered within Center-East,a planned unit development professional office about 100'yards of the crash site, complex located at 1711 West College Street. Keith Ward, a pilot who was at the Aviation 'Administration and the Y airport at the time of the accident. National Transportation Safety and debris was scattered over a Testimony will be taken at the public hearings.Maps and relat- ,� - 6 "It wasn't a glancing blow, it was Board were expected at the-scene larger area. ed data of the area under consideration may be reviewed in the .;• C.U.P.Kack offices of the Bozeman City-County Planning Office, 35 North ';v Appl'�cation :a solid collision," said Ward. "They today. Osceola, a community of about Bozeman Avenue,Bozeman;Montana,586-3321,ext.227. , were so mangled you couldn't even Authorities did not release. 2,000 people," is" about 40 miles, , ANDREW C.EPPLE .------r—� tell they were aircraft." names, but Coroner John Simenstad northeast of Minneapolis. Planning Director " j ' ' , Nation t • baskin - • 1000 in winter J � �u . warmth' ' By The Associated Press , `z. -1 It reached 72 degrees in South .'Dakota,beachgoers in shorts shared a park with ice fishermen in Pennsylvania and in Georgia,daffod- ils appeared one month earlier than, - usual. Some even budded A forecaster said the unseasona- bly warm weather was two months y ahead of schedule. In North Dakota ` on'% Sunday, temperatures hit the low,50s, some 30 degrees higher than normal for, � - -1 this time of,year. 1 1 , r; Mild' weather was expected "to continue today in many parts of the count We can get this,type of weather pattern occasionally, but not this.- K strong of a pattern," North Dakota �`q LiWA fo , It's airy the said Sun= x'forecaster Larry Manmuch of the Y g nation.", igh pressure in the upper at-' mosphere, combined with westerly =:winds over,the Rockies produced'," ' �•"" the balmy weather, Manthe said. 1. I'," �` Entire stock of current model At Presque Isle State 'Park on, II Lake Erie in Pennsylvania, an I ,. 'y. General Electric Quahty-Built estimated 20,000 people showed up f to enjoy the 54-degree weather, Washers and Dryers Now on officials said. ` ',`We'actually saw a few people in " Sale at Close-Out I riceS.t An �`\, shorts," police Sgt.Bob Vitron said. '..� Park police warned ice fishermen unusual opportunity to get the that the L record warmth could weaken ice on the lake, but. no ' BUY-OF-THE-YEAR! . ;'" N problems were reported. `� k "When, people go out in the, it morning, the ice is firm," Vitron `said. "But as soon as the sun comesI II out;in the afternoon,,the shoreline 1 � starts to break up and people have trouble getting back in." "This is what you'd expect in the second week of April,we're running two months ahead of schedule,"said Mark Ruminski, a forecaster with the National Weather Service infed W , Ca < " Albany, N.Y. The mercury rose to the mid-50s yam. in upstate New York,and the 60s in iU10" DA uywg� the Hudson Valley. In Chicago,it was 50 degrees and "another,excuse to go out and get 4 ice cream," said Judith Johnson, 30. "Maybe I'll get a little suntan,"said I � Matt Goska, :20, a sophomore at Northwestern University in nearby Evanston. Atlanta's average of 44.3 degrees in January was 2.4.degrees above normal, continuing a pattern set,in .1990, when the year was 4 degrees warmer than. normal, meteorolo- gist s said. I .,.,...,.. ", _>_, > ,...,;� _ go-.-N :+�,a•- -� r s�...�, • s BOZEMAN'.. _ ELECTRONICS APPLIANCES Montana's value Leader DENTURE CENTER p ® Missoula 1100 South Ave.W. 728-5151 c v` Bozeman 2275 West Koch 586-4771 John Mateskon Denturist Butte 2307'Harrison Ave. 723-8800 11 MIMM • 0` - Hamilton 646 N. 1st 363-6410 " 200 N. 7th Ave. 1`405 Cedar 442-4500 Helena 9 a.m.-6 6 pxh.Monday through Saturday. 586-6569 : '. 0- BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE,Monday, February 4, 1991 THE FAR SIDE By GARY LARSON ' -=r ey ®1991 Universal Press Syndloate ,• 3-q q- . 1?MMN, MM D �y, _ 6 SPECIAL FACTORY • n c PURCHASE DODGE & - i LYM OUTH MINI VANS N: .. r P Factory List. 20 256 lMEW e a f € Sale Price. 17I 5,500 r _ r ® GRAND _ 9- Special Factory,Purchase! , T a Factory List, $13 -- Sale Priced A As Low As .............$8995 87 CHEVY NOVA _. - . , 5 Door,Auto,Air R 9O L®� GALA'S 106-Fourwheel drive 108-FrnttriNllrlra 109-Autos for sale C Special Purchase Vehicle _ List$7900 L► :. ' e New! $5980 $ _ Xlent cond. Many options, ; p sedan, auto; PS, PB, am/fm, r 90 GMCyS15 se TOYOTA Corolla. 4 dr Sale Prie@ ........ • 8895 3560 1990 Tempo,great she e;low , #,.: t i Sale Price .. $14,900/offer. mllage,388-3348 or 586-6922 ^�•, 86K mi.; new tires.Gd Shape. %�„.. • ,y; 284 6526eeves.or.wknds.' • 89 Dodge Dynasty,exc coed. $2,395/offer. 587-4718 1989 Ford F250,XLT Lariat, Great price.585-9543,Iv msg :Will trade, dependable 1980 diesel, 5 spd, 19,750 mi, tow .''•89 VW Jetta GL. AC,cruise, Tercet plus extra set of tires pkg, manual hubs,air/cruse/ Cass.32Kmiles.$8,295/offer. 'Your 4x4 pickup w/air, must $7 OLDS F'�RENZA i. s �• r tilt;. PD/PW, much morel be In good mechanical cond, r „284-6526 eves or.wknds. Beautiful, $18,700. 587-3163 586-1053 after 6pm. 4 Door,4 Cy1 5 Spd .88 gray 4 dr Mercury Topaz p - R '88 Ford F-150 4X4 custom 79 CHEVY.MONZA List$49(50 - LTS. Loaded, Xlent car. ^ w/3,02 V-8. Low miles, air,- $6,500/offer. 586-9068 Starts great In cold weather. • - L 0 cruise, tilt,.slide rear window/.' " $450/offer. 587-9033 Sale Price ........ 38 v Xlent cond.285-6737 eves,- 188 HONDA CRX•air,PB,am/ - f" fm/cassette, auto.,.red. Fun 79 CUTLASS SUPREME 1988 Ford Tempo,4 dr,AWD, little Carl $6,500. 587-5355 ' Brougham Coupe.PS,PB,air, i $6.695• 1986 Colt Vista SW cassette, vinyl roof, 260-V8r w "' - a $5,695 • 1987 Subaru;'SW '88 Honda Accord LXI loaded $1,500. 587-5665 ! .• 1986 Subaru SW•586 6660 sheepskin seat covers. 16,000 - s 1 I x y r 79 Mercury Monarch. 4 dr, miles. $12,500. 587-5855 runs good. $750. 388-4300 -� -�:�_ � ,Y, •, � s �� � h 'so GMC SLE Sierra Ma ton, '87 Sundance. 5 spd, PW, ,78 Chry sl r New Yorker, 440 ` 4x4,auto,loaded,29,000 mi. am/fm/Cass,air;35 mpg;real_ ¢ € / t ext.warranty,Glasstite top- clean. $3,100. 585 9214 eng., loaded; 56K mi., 4DR per, blue/grey..See owner, ' hardtop, very nice, $1,700.' �: Al Bozeman Glass, 8-5, 87ToytoaCamry.4dr,5spd, 388-1500 •x._- 587-4061 after 5 587-8502 .38 mpg. $5,600. 586-8822 '1977 Pontaic Bonneville, 4 n a ■cell■■■e`e■■■ k Y: 'M BUICK ELECTRA, beauti door, excellent transportation, '87,810. Blazer; Xlent cond. ful car,low price,:1104 Cherry. $895 • 586-4679 or'see at ff. a . -: $8,700/offer 222-0108 Drive. 586-4081 8447 Goldenstein Lane 87'`'VW Vanagon,, all .whl ':-'85 Subaru GL Wagon. Met. '71 VW bus, runs exc., new 4xJill drive, 36,000 miles, orig, blue,,auto windows & locks, , tires $1,800/offer. 587-1109 owner, 100,000 mile exL tilt;clean. $2,995. 222-6733 GOVERNMENT SEIZED Ve- warn., MINT COND. 58M- 1 hicles from $100. Fords; + .,. ... .., 81 Cadillac. Eldorado Mercedes, Corvettes, Che XXX XXX XXX XXX '86 : y '86 S-10 Blazer, Sport pkg., $3, CA., new tires, loaded, Surplus. Your area. (1)- „ N $3,995/offer. 587 4414. 805-962 8000 Ext. S 8335 loaded, exc, cond.; 586-9767 ,,,* v, ;.:. . XXX,,,XXX•"aXXX"•XXX ___ v->. . »,-Y,v ✓ '' Classic super beetle,VW bug, '85,S10 Blazer 55,000 miles, ' excellent cond., great traction 109always v r " -Autos for sale for winter driving, alwa s new tires; air, 5 spd V6, g' y cruise, tilt; stereo, asking starts! economical $1,850 ;. 2: $6,395: Phone 587-2106 or . 587-8190 after 5 pm 1988 Honda Accord LXI,2DR, 587-2969 :' auto., exc. cond., 585-7374 'es Toyota axe, low miles, THE BOZEMAN �4 like now, am/fm, topper 85 Dodge Daytona,'maroon, ram: z 59,000 miles. Exc. cond. CHRONICLE ,, avail 2nd owner, all main., „a p . l :+.++ •+a ,.,, records $a,000/offerr', 222 7993 ::4,350: 586:7778 P ;g - .rS , Y :•.1, , 1) FCIV atJ -i .t,�1 -.E x-. , . 9a�t1B�VB 1ttiA!tt� Kk�lCldt�tGLn ,E �r� - _ - - - __ nt,A balne1982 Dodge Ram 17 0. ax backyW-6.!`AT."PS'�tflf,'alr'<, of wr tr, nn. r, ; - !q eyl'iTres"-iipe7,$3,500/ - . .L ors t .G„�r cruise, radio/Cass. Looks ande:�.,: w 1i.,fY �VC11410 offer. 388-3300 runs good, $3,000. 587-4115 &-WENDY'S -NICE '82 FORD F-150 83 Buick Century, AM/FM/ / "Maddog." Billion • "Too Loose" Frederick•"Pretty Boy"Coven• "Louie The Hook"Michel• "Mugsey" Go'Ver• "Four Fingers" Espellen • "Dutch" w/camper shell. 62,000 ry• PRESENT-FREE! I i. original miles.New tires.'Great,: Cass. excellent condition, �� „ e'it " a "Doc" e " e " • e a Shape. $4,800. 586-4533- $2,950 , 586-6716 COUNTRY FRIED STEAK! Olson; Roco Ron Olson-587=4657 Doc::GafHce-586-941.1 Killer" Ken Schmidt-587-3577 Mad Man Mortensen-586-6270 Quick 183 Chev S10 Blazer+78 Ram '_A new sandwich at Wendy's! Draw" Koelzer-587-3848 • "Chita c" Sam Reiter-587-7350 • "Minnesota' Pete.Cole-586-6371 • 'Hitman"-Osborne-587-2533 ' 'Finger? - 82'Toyota; blue, very good,' Charger,must sell. 587-4038 t g g ` cohd.• 70,000 miles, topper, -; With any purchase SfuChllk-587-0272- "Knuckles".. Ga Underwood-585-9694 • Rodger "BuM' Rood-587-71424 Duane "Duke"tJohnson-586-8662 • Brian $3,200. Bin 587-as57 eves of a 3 line; 6 day ry g g'7 83 HONDA ACCORD Classified Ad "gaby Face" Benson-585-9877'Jim"Machine Gun"Murray-388-4341 • Greg"Gunned"Harper=587-0786•Jim "Miles,City"Olson-586-3062 4 door,. cruise control, new 1982 Wagoneer;$2,800/offer.' .muffler, excellent Interior & Limited Offer SO... Take over pymts? 586-4242 ' exterior! 96K, good mpg, Call The Classified Team today! ` reliable. Runs Great! $3,800. 586-0704 after,5:30 PM. '587-4491 1 s o 11' . o r 1 1 1 r • 1 '8`I'Datsun 04, 80K miles. Sharp looking, rugged little truck. $2,500. 586-4463 STETSON `FORD • ' • ' • 0 1 :1 1 1 i 1981 Ford F250 4x4, 351, 4 1 ; ' ► { spd, good dond, no box- Big Timber , ctl8ssls cab;$3,000. 1 e - o yes-12o3 or 587-8939 eves. Call Bob NeVi►man.....932-5967 Days, Home .:.......:.....:.....587-0908 Eves. 181,Suburban'4X4,"auto,new brakes, motor, exhaust & Toll Free.. •:..-........1-800-537-3956 r - tires. 388 4732 or 388-1822 . WE HAVE MANY NEW 91 FORD _ $51000�000 180r CHEVY LUV 4X4. Runs CARS&TRUCKS IN STOCK. i •. INVENTORY. • �,, well. $1,200/offer. 587-3857 PLEASE LET US GIVE YOU THE f '79 Chevy pick-up. 20,000 BEST DEAL&KEEP YOU HAPPY, ® PRICES HAVE V.411 i • miles on new engine, all TOO! y / serviced. $2,900. 682-7546 BEEN •�C100 r '6 '79 JEEP WAGONEER LIMITED;Like New b 1879 Ford Bronco,v-s auto., t3450 & DEALING MASSACRED• - f R��►� ► ft cruise, tilt, am/fm Cass., ezc. cond.,$3,000.586-1579 '85 CHEVY BLAZER 810;6 Cyl,5 Spd,TW,AC,AM/FMlot" b1e Cass,52,000 Miles ••., r6995&DEALING �/a1,a 7$F-150 4X4, auto, topper, ""' """ sound: 9i2,100. 585-9214 '82 KAWASKI MOTORC1fCLE LTD 1000;7439 Miles S 1oW as 197e shortbox 0- pickup, dual ,•"' .... r ...................$1050&DEALING a - • p p. '88 CHEVY ASTRO`VAN;6 Cyl,AT,TW, CC,AC,Elec. tanks,chrome wheels,roll bar- Locks, Y r 87,000 mi.,$3,995.587-5319 Locks 35,500 Miles,Nice,Was$11,950..NOW$10,750 70 TOYOTA LANDCRUISER 40:_1450&DEALING '7.8 Chevy Yz ton 4x4,PS,PB, ' auto, 20K motor and trans. '79 FORD eb VAN 4x4;VS,AT,TW,CC,AC,$8650 $3000. 388-ee16 & RARING TO DEAL 1973 Ford F250 4x4, 4spd, '90 CROWN VIC LX;4 Dr,TW, CC,AC, Elec Locks&- OAS 369 V8, excellent-condition- Wdws, 18,900 Miles,$16,950 ' RARING TO DEAL $3r200 266-4252 /• 72 Jeep Wagoneer, always- started during cold weather, recent paint good tires, " I $1.500: 587-3023 n L A '7i Chevy. 3/4ton, new e g. rebuilt trans.,- very depend- able. $1,500. 285-6672 �1 � r i '69 Chev.H.D.34T.350 C I D., pp 4-spd., 4x4, 1T flat bed w7 t6��� ��gg��0�' ® © • . tiJ t� dump, PS, PB, stereo, new �Q��S�'UC�i� paint & more, Very -nice, $5,800. Call 388-1500• i �nrrmrr zzzzzzzzzz E t ' a - D ® r. .1977 Chev. %T,` Ac DMA , W_ D � • }. ob��e Cadillac► e shortbox,new engine & trans, p�dsm �► 'DICK $ miiiiZ2ZZZZZZZZ ! ► '4�' g ® �' - Pontiac sler► P�ylm°ut azda� 1980 FORD F250 4X4 Dodge C MC, Nissan & M - 107-import autos g .:.......NOW 2988 k 6 Cyl,4 Spd............. i 'TTUG ►:.: 1985 300ZX, good cond. a � , � Addf 1981 GMC 1/2 TON $6,995. Call 585-9183 eves SCUD' sale- needs stealth; V8,Auto,Clean,44 .. .. .NOW 4588 .• �;` { �� ' 1985 Mazda RX7, top cond., low-low mileage. 586-9661 1988 CHEVY 1 2 TON eves or 586-0661 days. / Y V8,Auto,AC,4x4 Clean.... ....NOW 9988. e ; '83 HONDA ACCORD - 1984 CHEVY 1/2 TON s ``� Feb u 4,door, Cruise.Control, new � _ �� • _ a muffler, excellent interior & 4x4,V8,Auto,AC NOW 6688 ` Sq� exterior! 96K, good mpg* N w ESM •F M reliable. Runs Great! $3,800. ^' �® •� •eb� , ® ® '� 586-0704 after 5:30 PM. . 1987 FORD TEMPO 4X4 g a eekdQ , I6f/� ED a 4 Dr,Clean NOW 5995 ." , s4 �T 'CO.Honda Prelude,new paint, -• J yS 8 gd shape,must see to drive & We Have Over 50 Cars& ® CB • \ y !S 9 ,6 `SHARP appreciate. $2,500: 587-3023 Trucks To Choose From! 0 �B •• , • PENC, s �. 39;r$ubaru, 5 spd am/fm/ _ G • . I ca: 0 miles on 586-0193 �.0 , ; ® . engirs . 585-9214 506 North 7tt1 HOME 586-7315 Nissan Sentra, 2DR XE, low Bozeman, MT.: Ron Biery miles,exc.cond.,$7,995.Call - ' ' ' • t 1-222-0205 {<# CIKAN ARCHITECTS,P.C. r 544 East Mendenhall,Suite A,Bozeman,Montana 59715 Phone/Fax (406) 586 3624 January 23, 1991 Bozeman City-County Planning Office Attn.: Andrew C. Epple, AICP, Planning Director 35 North Bozeman Avenue P.O. Box'640, Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Hamilton Stores, Inc. Winter Headquarters Bozeman, MT Dear Andrew: I am following-up on our phone conversation concerning the above project. I talked to Jim Kack and he was very receptive about submitting a Conditional Use Permit application to the city amending the Land Use Development Guidelines for College Park Professional Center-East. The additional language should clarify the interpretation of the Guidelines for the type of construction proposed for the PUD. We feel that we have complied with the original guidelines by the use of natural. materials as permitted by the covenants including the use of siding, wood shingles and moss rock wainscot. The roof has substantial eave overhangs (3 ft) as recommended and earthtone colors for the exterior. In addition we are providing an interior "courtyard", safe vehicular circulation and parklike appearance (see p.6, item 4 of the"site plan designs/considerations to be met"). T 4 i L. .]'Ct - L L: r.0 .7 n: L fitting i the i.Gint at wNILch we %.ti11C1 is the iitte preta I o Gur design and i�S f�LLA into the architectural theme for the PUD as expressed by the sentence in the guidelines concerning the achievement of "... a harmonious combination of building design and materials the that blend together in a personalized, yet unified theme." Allow me to quote from Old & New Architecture, Design Relationship published by the Preservation Press from a conference sponsored by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. • "When efforts have been made to blend by imitation, the results have generally been unfavorable. Too frequently the design features of an old structure are inappropriate to the scale of the new one." The Harmony That Can't Be Dictated by Giorgio Cavaglieri, p.46 C� � �- �� Dr. Brian Rogers - Informal Review Dave Skelton described the application. Dave stated that the DRC had had no objections to the third drive access as shown, but that the access would require a deviation in formal review. Keith Swenson questioned whether a DRB deviation recommendation was required. Design Review Board - January 8, 1991 a Dr. Brian Rogers - Informal Review Dave Skelton summarized the project for the DRC, noting that the plan was reviewed conceptually several years age and was approved at that time. Dave stated that the applicant's main concern is whether they will be slowed to use the third acces they had planned on. The DRC expressed concern about drainage in the entire area, but.generally agreed that the third access was best left where it was shown on the plan. Bob Janz noted.that a one hour fire wall would be required on the northernmost side of the building due to its proximity to the lot line. Concern was also expressed about the location and nature of the sanitary sewer extension on the site. Craig Brawner stated that as-built drawings of said sewer would be required, as well as information concerning its construction and certification status. Development Review Committee, January 8, 1990 i I I I LAND USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST, INC. Submitted by: James W. Kack 6531. Jackson Creek Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Originally filed and approved January 4, 1938 Amended November 15, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS LAND USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER-East bection I Intent Section II. -Legal Description Section III Permitted Uses Section IV ' Review,and Approval Process A. Specific Submittal Procedures B. Institutional Review Process Section V General Considerations - Master Plan Submittal A. 'Site Plan Review B. Building Permit Procedure Section VI Design Theme A. 'Design considerations desired B. Design considerations not allowed C. Site plan considerations to be met D. Signage E. Landscaping Section VII Exhibits: A ).r---.•:;Leval Description B - Site Plan C' - Declaration and Bylaws of CPPC-East D - Landscape Plan E - Architectual designs/examples F - Improvements Agreement with City of Bozeman LAND USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST INTENT: It is the intent of these guidelines to supplement the Bozeman Zoning Code, and the protective covenants as outlined in the Declaration and By-Laws of College Park Professional Center-East property owners association. These guidelines offer design criteria for all" aspects of the engineering, construction, landscaping, signage, and other site improvements. College Park Professional Center-East (CPPC=East) is designed to be a number of office buildings situated in a park-like setting. The PUD project is designed to promote maximum flexibility in land utilization so as to facilitate the provision of more desirable, aesthetic use of open space. Each building will house one or more business or professional firms who may either lease, or own, their univ. All owners will be members of a non-profit corporation, or association which will own and maintain all common areas (Declaration and By-Laws attached herewith as Exhibit C) . . The owners or leasees of each building within the park should familiarize themselves with the intent and requirements of these guidelines and all applicable governmental codes and regulations. They should implement, through their architects, all those provisions applicable to their speci.fi.c site development. This will al'_ow expeditious completion of the design review process described herein'. Engineering drawings, photos and sketches herewith outline the concept and theme-of the project•. Each building site will be prepared by the owner or owners thereof, who will be responsible for installation of all utilities, drainage, landscaping, parking, curb and gutter, sidewalks exterior (common area) lighting as per the CPPC-East Master Plan as amended November, 1990. Building owners/builders will also be responsible for complying with all applicable city and county building regulations, ' and for compliance with these guidelines. Thus, these guidelines are designed to outline in as much detail as is practical, all aspects of design and construction of CPPC-East. 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: These guidelines for College Park Professional Center-East apply to the following described real estate situated in Gallatin County, Montana to-wit: AMENDED PLAT OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST (A P.U.D. ) Located in Silt Sec. 12 Twsp. 2S R5E PMN City of. Bozeman Gallatin County Montana (Exhibit A) PERMITTED USES: College Park Professional Center - East is within an R-0 district; and will be for the construction of business and professional offices, accessory uses, signage ( as outlined herein) and temporary buildings for and during construction. The following uses are permitted in R-0 districts, but will be prohibited in these land development guidelines: 1. Apartments and multi-family dwellings 2. Churches 3. Efficiency Units 4. Fire Stations REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS► A11 developmental plans for the project must be reviewed and approved as outlined in Chapter 18.54 Planned Unit Development, and Chapter 18.52 Minor Site Plan Review. All construction plans must also be reviewed and approved per the Declaration and By-Laws of College Park Professional Center - East. Specific Submittal Procedures: All planned improvements or modifications of site or common areas must be submitted to the Architectual Committee of CPPC-East for approval in accordance with Article XVI of the CPPC-East By-Laws. (copy attached) Institutional Review Process: In the course of designing buildings for construction within CPPC-East various reviews and approvals will be required. The following summary of. the City of* Bozeman and other review and approval processes is included to assist. i.ndi.vi.dual builders in understanding the approximate nature and sequence of those reviews. An understanding of the total review process from the outset will contribute to smoother and more efficient processing of each proposed building. . 2 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS - MASTER PLAN SUBMITTAL: . 1. Schematic layout of all proposed buildings and structures, traffic circulation and parking areas. Y. Phasing plan, if applicable, describing phasing of the total ....:.:master plan development, illustrating the approximation of development and completion of each phase. 3.' Engineering considerations: a. proposed grading and drainage. b. proposed utilities layout (water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, electrical, and telephone services, etc. . 4. Circulation and parking considerations: a. configuration of 'parking and vehicular circulation. b. Dimensioni.of 'parking stalls and driving lanes. c: total parking provided. d.. 'provision for' delivery zones. e. calculation demonstrating total partcing required for maximum floor space development. 5. Architectu`al Considerations: a. building- footprints.. 'b. overhangs. C. gross (possible) floor area. d., descriptions or sketches of the architectual design concept including intended character and materials. 6. Landscaping considerations: a. concept planing plan. b. proposed landscape grading and drainage plan. c. illustration of total. site coverage as a function of net lot area to building ground contact area. It should be noted that the developer of CPPC-East is co-operating with the adjacent landowner to the west, Dr. P. Brian Rogers, on the land utilization of the two properties. Although Dr. Rogers property is not a part of the "CPPC-East" ( thus, our designation of "east" . . so as not to misconstrue ownership in the event the public omes to know the both properties as "College Park Professional Center" ) . . . a reciprocal easement exists on the boundary line for mutual ingress-egress. A visit to the area will confirm that the original facilities and structures as proposed in 1984 were built as per that plan and the attached Site Plan. (Exhibit B) 3 Site Plan Review: 1. Submission a. Submit 3 copies of the site plan and related data to: Bozeman Planning Office P.O. Box 640 Bozeman, MT 59715 b. Also submit an "Application for Site Plan Review and a filing fee based upon the following schedule: Minor Site Plan Review - $60.00 2. Review Process a. The planning staff encourages the applicant to meet informally with them prior to official plan submission. b. The planning staff will check the plan for. compliance with the Development Guidelines for CPPC-East as we'll as City of Bozeman Zoning Regulations. c. The planning staff has fifteen days to complete their Minor Site Plan Review. d. If the plan meets the regulations, then "conditional approval" is granted by the planning staff. 3. Revisions: The applicant has up to six months to respond to comments on the plan made by the planning staff. After that ti.me .the applicant would have to resubmit the application. 4. Final Submission: a. Submit three site plans to the planning staff with conditions met. b. The planning staff will prepare an "Estimated Cost for improvements" form. c. If all conditions are met in the final site plan, enter into an "Improvements Agreement" with the City of lio•r.uman. This step requires three to four days. d. After Agreement has been signed, the planning staff signs the final site plan and forwards them to the Building Department. e. Applicant has eighteen months to complete the project following the signing of the "Improvements Agreement". f. If occupancy occurs prior to completion of all site improvements the applicant must provide the city with a Letter of. Credit for no less than 1# times the value of the remaining i.mprovement.s. 4 Building Permit Procedure: Each phase or lot will be prepared by its owner or owners who will be'responsible for installation. of all utilities, drainage, landscaping, parking, curb and gutter, sidewalks and exterior lighting. Building owners/builders will be responsible for complying with all applicable city and county building regulations, and for compliance with these guidelines. Individual building owners/builders will be responsible for complying with all applicable city and county building r.egulations, . and for compliance with these guidelines. 1. Submission for building permit: a. submit two copies of plans and specifications to: Building Department P.O. Box 640 Bozeman, MT 59715 b. Approval for the building cannot be granted until the signed final site plan has been forwarded by the planning staff. The applicant may submit the building plans prior to site plan approval , although the permit will not be issued until the site plan is approved. c. Plan check fees are established by the schedule in the current edition of the Uniform Building Code.. The valuation of the project will be determined by the applicants estimate or by the Building Department using the current I'.C.B.O. square foot cost figures. 2. Review Process: a. The building department plan review will take up to two weeks. The building permit will be issued following proper compliance with the codes and the receipt of the approved site plan from the planning staff. b. An occupancy certificate is required prior to occupying the structure. DESIGN THEME: The following sections of this development guideline outline the design theme for the project, and architectual components that will be accepted or rejected for the project. Those items of minor modifications, such as minor site plan or "footprint" revisions, use of specific roofing materials, roof pitch, texture of: siding materials, window casings and door trim, 5 I exterior stain colors, minor landscape plan and signage modifications will be reviewed by the CPPC-East Architectual Committee along with the Planning Director, and accepted or rejected thereby. Major modifications, such as change in architectual theme, changes' in traffic flow or ingress- egress, .or land use (as allowed in the total R-0 code,) must be reviewed through the Conditional Use or Planned Unit Developmental Process. This "mini" office park is designed to create its own environment. It is expected the tenant mix will not generate a high traffic flow. The buildings will be of a "western-U.S." feel. Building Design Considerations that set forth the Architectual theme of the P.U.D. . 1. Exterior colors of earthtones. 2. Rough sawn 'siding of board on batten, board on board, grooved panelling, channel siding, and shingles. 3. Moss rock or fieldstone wainscoat or accent. 4. Exposed beams where structurally appropriate. . 5. Substantial eves, gabled ends, and dormer treatments. Building Design Considerations NOT allowed: 1. Metal or Plastic sidings to buildings. 2. Stucco or exposed concrete block where those materials comprise over 15% of the exterior siding surface. 3. Architecture that reflects "period styling" (as colonial, modernistic steel and glass domes, etc. ) 4. Use of pastel or bright colors on other than "detailing" trim. 5. Signs or building identification other than that approved by the .GPPC-East Board of Directors.. Those Site Plan designs/considerations to be met: 1. Ease of occupants and visitors access from parking areas to buildings. 2. Maintaining parking around perimeter of development to allow for most aesthetic use of interior "courtyard" effect. 3. Convenient and safe.vehicular circulation. 4. An office environment that is attractive due to its parklike appearance and archetectual interest. 5. A combination of construction and landscaping that enhances the value of all property within CPPC-East.:.::. 6 EMEMMM Signage: Signage for the PUD and individual buildings will be approved by the Directors of CPPC-East, and will conform to Chapter 18.65 of the Zoning Code. Landscaping: Property Owners will be responsible to meet all requirements of landscaping for off-street parking as outlined in Chapter 18.50 of the Zoning Code. The planted areas will have an underground sprinkling system which will be owned and maintained by the property owners association. The design goal of the plan will be to create a courtyard with greenery that will screen direct view from one building to another, yet be sufficiently "open" with lawn and walkway so as to be able to stroll between buildings in spring through fall seasons. Fencing and Screening: Fences will be allowed only to screen patio areas. Fence/screen height not to exceed 50 inches from floor level of building, and will be of the same material(s) and design theme as utilized in the exterior elevations of the building. Exterior (parking) Lighting: Building owners will furnish luminaire fixtures in the parking areas as per the existing type/style installed at Lot 1, and show on the Site Plan attached. The CPPC-East Association board of directors will determine the hours of operation for all parking lot lighting. SUMMARY, The land use development guidelines for .College Park Professional Center- East are essentially a covenant between the owners and the city of Bozeman. The mechanism that makes them legally binding on the owners is their acceptance by the city as a series of conditions which are adopted in the same fashion as all other conditions of approval normally applied by the city through the Conditional Use Permit review process. In all instances the existing municipal codes regulating building construction and site development are superior to any of these stated or implied guidelines. These guidelines may be modified or amended from time to time as is deemed necessary. Modifications or amendments may be proposed by the city of. Bozeman planning staff or-developer. Minor changes made for the purpose of clarification or changes that do not alter the intent of the guidelines may be approved by the Planning Director. Amendments or modifications that change the intent, the boundaries or substantially alter these guidelines shall be reviewed by the Zoning and City Commission through the Conditional Use Permit Process. FOR ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION OF THESE GUIDELINES CONTACT: Developer: Jim Kack Planning Office 6531 Jackson Creek Road City of Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59715 P.O. Box 640 Bozeman, MT 59715 (.406) 587-9488 (406) 586-3321 8 EXHIBIT A (photo copy of Plat will be inserted here after approval by city, and recording by Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder) AMENDED PLAT OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST (A P.U.D. ) Located in SWk Sec. 12 Twsp. 2S . R5E PMM City of Bozeman Gallatin County Montana EXHIBIT B (Photocopy of Amended Site Plan will be inserted here when approved by City) EXHIBIT C Lands Committed to this Declaration Real property in Gallatin County, Montana, described as follows: AMENDED PLAT OF COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST (A P.U.D. ) Located in Sk Sec. 12 Twsp. 2S R5E PMM City of Bozeman Gallatin County Montana . !s'fSlNlSLri�J �\�IJIS�SUISLS�S Z! SINCE 1898 P. O. Box 242 - Bozeman, Montana 59715 JEREMIAH P. CASHMAN Phone: (406) 587.3406 EXHIBIT D 13 August 1987 Dear City Planner, This letter is in regard to landscaping of property owned by James Kack on West College Avenue referred to as the College Park Professional Center. Our proposed landscaping shall conform to city zoning codes as to percentage of green .landscaped area, number and size of trees and planting areas, and parking area requirements. The design shall be consistent with that used at the two existing buildings within the complex using similar plant materials such as Quaking Aspen, Flowering Crabapples, Scotch Pine, and Colorado Spruce for trees and various hardy deciduous and evergreen shrubs. We shall be using sod areas along streets and walkways. The quality of the design and materials installed shall be consistent with the existing project and city requirements. Sincerely, Jeremiah P. Cashman Cashman Nursery OTHER OFFICES IN MINOT,NORTH DAKOTA,BISMARCK,NORTH DAKOTA and FERGUS FALLS,MINNESOTA EXHIBIT E A SKETCHBOOK ARCHITECTUAL DESIGNS/EXAMPLES 4 - +.• +.r; j alft Y vl [f y} Ali �� .�?�LrJf�t�.l'Vii,� r;t r r'a1Vl,[',y'4+y ! � si • •• - � °4 it',JN�,� �V. �I f�1Uj�`'jT�re'rIL A2•�j -I✓fyiy' 4'h> , +�tlL�r i;l +� (� L�4 ilJ ➢ �r S p1 1 l s� 115� '}.tT.r t p+it Yt U ; rr � jj t �r i [r✓L t'Plr �11 � C'v� �1,+£:'.:i:...fir'-: �.:•• I... ,i:..;;:,,...•:-:•.''< .� •.: •.- .. ,..n 'air.: tr,[��' ,f..'it 't` 1k i�![.Y/, h4 G�'•,jr'; y�/pitif` } .•, f;, /; ''T '}�PI,J;';'"'•,',y'.1 F� LYi {}.'�.= A I��„7,.4�,�:t�1 1i�tA.i• ' f���••�I�y'kI +,3 1f t.F;'-; l I�.r��;•.;la",+�a�l� �1'•. . . • . ?rr��',k:,4ij�.t�;�. ii�"$�"{:�• ."T?^��.�L'a;4 �`3,,�''t h.? ',Trj{}:•.t� '�'•'�;�1;:��•F 5;€ F S;`i1 I'i .}cY'1 .{ tl� +�,���Q�iiy; L. (y�M1�•} .�y ,�'r'k �: 1}A�•!:}:` J t ��;,45: •• - . "[, �.. .i/ '� :f1'a, y c i '+Yy}�:Ft`!�S• ••r•'J,�: '�Ci•'''�t �t,ptG:. �' • • Klil!IfAP i .�.,i1 y.r•.':: �' ,tilt ;���rr�a�:1y:4' * fin: '•��..a•�tit,' �`•. y�I'Y,'•tiy,� y }. .�ti•. 4 • ✓ �'VIRa�: '�e - •• - • • • • ,� �q{, ;{Gy,^tT'r'''{J�„rWWW�.I[,I, S �,' R,yY �•:i dr 1.,�,�� V t • » t�3,ti�1,� y;r{ L� r' _' � ��y �j,�-.i�;S'r'�i�r�t 4ia �;�� . - j<l �y�t� ��: ..{�i-fZ�j,•r / i, li�'I�}�{=1Sgy�tF/=�;'Z�'"� [ jtit� lu i7 'I IIF'�y 'F 'llr.}7I1'v���,{•i�1 Y.. ,:. r, i t • •'�.,� l 1.>tf[t-IN ,,y F' 've � +� a,�n 1 Tr 4F.. 7r�4`1✓ I'% �P+ '",Y�Ij��l{ �yf• � Sty ti< ,�s ��•' ,`{',�'v,�S����ziF;fir`�',�ir��{.3�SJ�{�'�f�i►����t, l�`�-,.9 '' V � � S'Y'�'� '1 Fr ,,� 1i�� d r',�IY� 1 a,rP;Ct`I�,f`,.y�'�' �V6iy �;�•:;.Y.u•,�;" N��, ,,�� � �,qq � 1 t �� �`'���5� ��,4�t1✓�`�s.����1�1'� iSxi�t�f•�l}#�,;9����'�'.\����r;';;: 1 �R, 35� j"�I �{• %•�tr¢, > +r. ��; ��`}72y'a�d•%` fna;li�4•'. c� -14 i� ..� �. �d. rJj,ryt 11•� r ,..�L�r.;`'�`'yt��jC'�i�{• �'�- ,✓♦�'t'.f MAW .1 "')J;.,[{ r,��t����,'y� ,1 p::�;'.�s i,;3�.; �',1 r+,�•r}� i'iy�'�1 ,' "�13�!'lF il�Si M1..r.� � r�•..P�O '1 j{N'r♦♦�j]1)"'�. 1[��•t�,��,.�(y N 4_�[` •`l�'• �'S\� �', glrf �`"!r;{{;q�9j'f•1 Yt4 �ir��P,,p�,.71��r'1J���f�j. ':f �`:•/: F iCr?. `4�aw6s. . . . •• ...t"mow ;a.:/v:�'q�t•!C;r��:'�p••,�/ f °h�•t,����i��:l a �.1L� � it rvY '( t i +1it �` �,� .i:j�.i�`.•�i:.i':.�;��:j,!?u;tN oly:.l:t- �J{�jQ,�_,, .t.-.V?N �1•w •I Q' �.§I'�• '' !( (r•.A j f,?{ �{.�J+r}JI ice(.•;?+:.. .w%�. t..L'�: 11tr i t �.�.�?.:�r,•,�i.j�''cl 1+C��f,1 j�'�,Y.t;:a'.��'• .� p�!!»:f+ ��P�ti�t' ,f� Y�'� �N�y ids•' r�'�w ��yy"y� .��+. �i+�s'f%li. :sl "!'� �y1 �.Mi-�.•ly�r,x�!}. ','- Iil.•i}':a• . TT�-.G � Myyi�s �4��� b• � �i. ,£, �utY.?,�" j t .r •1v'�x+�P�-�, t �y\ :ii w .1�. .`a��.�vrl. � f•t� ,. 1.•L•w� rbY V� I cfti')C ��.v$' +:.!�a,a.l,:a. f •t V V�t „A �� >':• rP.r•,Y.•. +� 6 a� .a Jill, 1•�'1.,.. i,i �' Y_`�° �s •n.,�r�J:.S"�f•:�•.ar• ((''�'• ,1 a t� t�f S. ^Ra•7 a vc, �S, •• �1l. � 'i��.f'.,it'Cr; v.ri '� e �!� ,t U: fix. •u, :2� s, t•..s.. Q !�,n3� f }�tsyt c`•'Fn 1,�(n�.`'y'A^ ,�,1('.l�eilt:,GD.f w �x'F r!' •h ,�3 a ''� ytY .;t 1���t'�. t1, ,: f aV:r'rrU;{'y`7:.'+fi:�'�t�r �•`}`'. ,'.•I�i4�. '�� 4.•t,H' T 1��,,.r{j, _,� .i:' ...�d:r,Vl�''�. ti �,Nq �+,-[c,�,,�,�y\�11��++��,,yfir,: Ly . j,7y,d orl� �j 4 vr�r�y4(,�.• �i.� +�, .,1�. .tN�1�y,e'V� �Itl:Se"i'��1V Ir....r:..t •fai'�tyyyy��,,1,r• �'� -.}?(•.�XP f�l���y.. �1.Tj,i '�'JJ,.."(�T��jtAA 1.. �{-."'i•. re�Va ��.+�•.'Gll'i. .iS: l 7� �tl!'' ��(( t a +:""fit R t. l.i + •~` '7, Lw�. . ;� 1 A• +' � `I '�.f Ht. i+! SNie •'Y r { ?ji1;. Fat ai i,3 1 ��n a b.;1� �•d1}.•' rr o raw � + ��,`�_yyi!.�� y ! 'CJ� •, �•JIRi '�qtQ,,y�a✓,�.. ,�f�(�?1..".�:; 1 '_ �yY1•,y��(ilty( � �..f.11,� S{'�+!t., 9/. f••{(�?y'.�.r.;.:'s\.. .. .... Signage for entrance{sj to park. ' _ ' - �l:yrinoicm�Tr �aey9.t�.c-zar-. , yam' Cy . �tiu;��.t.�`?,� ��� ::!fit r_sry:yJ-.,;.. :, �'`�y� b r:v..t�C!''f�1 y i 1, - �• ~.tr Y Typical-trash- encllos'ure­ to--:be utilzed'` to mask c'3mmeicial.dumps+tter Co-ordinated signage at entrance 'to "neighhoring" property of Dr. P.• Brian Rogers Iy t1,1 •. 't _ �,b t Ili `:,�1 �, f {( P. ' Nei .� ���f� .'T'!� , .yQ... � ':� �t�•. . .. ..ti ".�'�? Ir id.�.ott Q:�'• d�l�t(�•.�! G:�'" f., rr� 1'(-t`•'�Y` ':::4.��'r1:, • �Y�T~y�r,,,��n7~ �� I� .�.. �.:, F.aa,1+�I, l F?��}J�y� ,C,�Ly��"�'���+`t�•.r �f::t •�i\d,Q r'�'{•C;�''���~ (�'��.�. �' �" y�l`'1}'a�+:)vi• 1 l '4 �J:.:r �t :�- 4:{,� i.r�f`�fl���(.h � 'tl: .r ti: ♦ F91 j "y','.('I:Y:Crt:::'r?`•1.ctf•'��.+..!r`.t....: i?':)`+l�'Jglt�.*r�`.i�t'i J.a.:l•."�.�.t. �1..L'.i.i •..Crk:✓..'�. c r a,. Z^4'Uk.r. .${4"0.l,...II 'W� IS 1• i1+1 ,('+ 1+1`Pa'S<toy yJ'`�:a�p(i ,�: {:/'yi`1,�/'aV•• �'"S• � t(�rtti�'L�:��1��3; I�rt� 4��1 �i ,'t�°:r t5'C;!•..•�� �o:k .},'���{{�Al F =+'1' .4 f \'1{'\ Ih ,�� i y• ,/ . y� n ��- ����' ' U��1Jt, !,'�r'� ('I �p�•�,A��, 1?I��� ' �{,,��w,•i�$.(}(.��t�d. Z�;�'���i+:t �IC��I.�t � }'r:l'�,��r;••;;;� •�,�i1�q 4��', t 1 I��h y I;�,'f �}��! �h� ti'i 1r i �'y l�• a rtgrT,r a (� d..F,t•'tr� i'lUi �r `�Sl,�+;i� 1 S7,f• .q �`•' �1 j � ((•V�• .�j{r`�(G"p�t+.((�w('��l 'y 1' ,y �. V j i., fj` .7•';j j JP^ ,,4 1 f.�{fy>r^}�" •n'v1� V .&1r,, �rL,J•>(4Wtr1•'v.�i Nil. '�.'Jj rl{ 7'•f/,i /CJ•4..�{ 's�t� I�� �• T `�jr V '•j{{tf�'.;((((��''"'p �Cy 916'� ���: :�t:°•�; fj(T �•�,r o�; �Iyfjp%��� ,�'�..L,�r�,��y�j�••!�: �;r{�y�t1tr-'�I. i !��!�. �'�.,3„•1�••71!•��'yq�.� .\�i� i a {� f'' ��y�c �- ' ,fa�>:`�'1N��f��.•y�i1�F ..r!"''�- i��P.�roi �l�,�',,'<�.i: ;l l4 kr '�.:�• �' • � • • • •�'S R r}i rp" IFrP'�� {fiyl p�i� ��C'•�ty .°!,•...Y►I►'`�T•� �'if`Ify lad+; .�; , :..�df,K '': r�•�!'!+'�°�'�•'}^��'.'�' � �;'i � "� 11 � 'j •b dl � a•++ ' ter' ;`K� {t , �•1r'r >�r i �• s� 1t.. �!' J`�I�" 1��• ��•j14 ';'�`�.u''n!t a°� �.�5 lei ��, !k • •�dlZr �� . •�.,. .�, ; , •. f ll � 1 �.J�.r•_�' LYD� , • •�� ' •��.. ,o u t•� Ll- I . I' � 1r• rj�B Aj!S J 'r �t -- �. �. Lill "'4� '�.ft '�•. �•Ij' i•hL,` ,6 '� 1 I' .il,. }� �.9 ,lli F, i��� `�� I {, :+�••:•1.r r k:�1�I,P, JJ,i�tri:'• r '1n 'l'Nk ,(� - te� +� 1�I}! '1?(iV►%.Ir `; 9 i`rl�l(t1�.,NM�.�,,,ps�'J ��j?�a , Ct'�q t' t I/�+ � �'l��l t1?+1^ f ;`'Jf�)�1i� l'J��.• ;��PlFSi,"'�K '� �1< A 1�. {'r � �,1 ���.s,tr(�li�'�'a2 j •� ,i,, tir J�/{,'tr `II .`��. � ,JAY `.t ,L �. ''}�tY/JR:17111, r,.a• i9 �'�4�A'8��'7�r:l�Al � , � 3 ��,. e t� (r. :;:�'`.;.(•s: „•��'�:.�j.a.`'�n .'il.t.•li,,, ry:• s};!tY +'''s\.• '+ t� �'S;�l'..,t. +tec,�Yys, ! �!y.::iti 1• .u,. ;:7.r.•i:a Ltli�'rtr,•,,. t•1;. 'r..,. `y4�":a.,•4:i„�` �:i��ir �'•,tvor;.i,'";h!r: n :;��'J�1�ivEli'`fi6v';.'t�:"•••ryl;t.f. ( .y,:ipl�rs>: •:�:'• P✓„o�•'.•'ai''. f /„ }, :ti.,.r.% Y:::, �;.ii,�)a•,: n L'i•t it A;i.,7•r(i.'M1�'if,;i;.i'��': .�,'� 'r$�: �'�;�E�s:�.'4:�',h,!'$! N :.,;}Y s. � :ris r��l.rA:f.�.•''a. s• } +/:'. a„ ' �?�P::• '1 :.t;:h I �j �l 'S,f•¢ t�.�� •,� :Y..L,,i r'• 1 �'� t rl :l! ,rl:, 'j�f>s 6•j�:icYti"��.'�i`a-1'v .`?.`i'��`.Y.: °^s:�!,.{,`J'°<'1}tr�{:�'.• :!P�'I��:1.`;i i��:.i;R?p:; 6�.ly�,ir:�;\. '.v;: ;'�JFP,�f' Y.��S;y,����4 s.,,��t,��.t¢;'s. 1 r f].1 r a'C ji.n\!kk••, ,.: t : i II 'i �,.. �.�� f> Zr � fi 1,.,7t nlJ: t ll,d ,�!? ,J �f�.�_/' r• 44 _ - ,�Nf`•i• v.' Ste• :t� .�Y ed �'rl.•T <•!f ip In:Alt R pr 1./ �'1^1 W • 1/r,.• ,n•;I'':! I v,5i..1�i„e.�•1•i- tile.. TAA KL 31 'iit, jq r I �+J,yyn ��y� .r�T•.,,`.• �l1l.I,( ,�l ( '•:1,, s•�� ,'�az•. ' �jC��t;,•'::"—' tea'."" ;::7f'7,1;. �.:•Cf� •It,r.;r'.•'.p .�, ••?.3•,; 1�•yhl : •w .SLc .r !` ��� � ( :.:II' Ir}t >�' •', :r �!41'�.s,�•1�, , <i,1,ti( � 1 • • • :��.fd'',i�i!• • � ,�J' R' ,��.i ���1.�;�1•.^}I ���I'.,.� -I�;'.):. KII'1:,'.p i�:d:a,:�f':• �}�Y Y'n•I!, '\•i $.7tAM '�•i4 � lei� (�{'�: t� '� :Y=, '' r i ` 1 r 1 t5 .�. `p, �\• '� L y`"���.,/yil� + �'.�F',��r.''J��,d;j:3��i, a ,;ji, a',:.I„i'•„,1•a.' ';1;''t�''r '•� 1 • • 1 ,� �C u��,.a�+ �."1 JJ�•. ` ;`, Il��t�tJJ�I�it + �� :11 r role 7��1y "s (` I•� �•. ��[t"'��' r , �::,, 'f^9; .. �.. ,\. ••fir 3y:. `�%d' \ r ` >F � :�t•' �; •�"�;•~S�'1'� ';Irofl ��'a":`�rj�1�:•�r>?'�i��,��: .. �"♦•�, ,` 1!I• 1� \Ir f C+ 1 i 11�.,7 4�'III�1�.N.. t� `''�'r ;'�► � �� `,�..�%,SW 4 + , 1 f��, F S s ii;C 1?'11 ft :t t}It M�y.r•```�'.' �.�fi; '� •P { � 1 n ,; F,�I SC4 , ; ,� � ftl r�Y ti' .k'a�vti�� 'i"� •r�r��1�(!1!�•f1 �k,�I'i, f���S:i���y °tl.�t' �I�j����1F ..rlr,• i Gi � �;�7:';�.�••+it.�111 ;f '1� j •.i,,�f'�;ii i^��r% , ,.. •� M:y�r, it :.1 �.�.��l�^ �C::t' ••� 1IIIIIIIIIIh _.. Nn:lift lf �. j jiill !(IIIII:;►; ;l I II ND ��Inllllllll illlu - IIIIIIIIIIIII ITIIIIlil'l: l�;n� it •�,;,i; ll'� u� iG ii.�l ii�I►j ii� n�1��1 P. 1111-it IIIIIII - � illliglul .illll ,, .."II.���'ll�•1'•!I IIIIII�. �� t,;l�;�;c!;� �.. ... Hm tj :•:•, ''1 ��IIIIIII, 1 ;.;: . •4••.;:I'1 •.ter •.•=1.1 � t.l 1'' ':� IIIIII:� . IIIIIIIIII IIIII °` Ill, i�l liIM O %l� ;i• ''•� IIIIII,�=� '�' '� (IIIII •'. I ;:. ,;;;;€? u. n -•/ ••• (III, �IIIIIIIIIIII � �� ` L�.._I�, Inulull—�= Im� 1• I. w Board-and-Batten, Channd Rustic Tongue&Groove/But4y LI Tongue&Croove/VJoint Tongue&Groove/Bullnose Tongue&Groove/Double Beaded We IRZ b t Types of acceptable siding styles. Vertical installation �� desired. Tel, r . 7 j J r Flush Pattern JIiR y f M f y " ti V-Joint Plywood Profiles _ .._._....... ...... x�+488%.. 1/4'�d�•e�eep x I Ih"wiixdeeN�y J yp�1lrn�oirryl2ed�r Balton 12''�a.c. . Shlplap �tSa,kiLY.?N�W�K'��.".�A�?�NN�YN/�7,`t1. he..raNw.y`J1:ti'�iuX:+G�i57"�r7Y�1.ltMfSxWl��li,�i5f7�L4itY�Y7a�AT� �wv..::..� �': 48%' _ 'A'deep x 1'wide Invorlod Batton 8-o.c. 'Shlplap '✓—Yip Ye' 480Yi Y.'deepx 3/.'wide TI.11. 4'o.c. Shlplap -•►I/.'I4' Ye' Yi 48%' -/.'deep x Ye'wide Till 8'o.c. Shlplap 91�.,..�fr�`�24 °J�. 4Ri�t��`�.,a" �t�ln"�.✓ $f��i� ' `�.l� .c�',�o;,��i'Cb�ai"FR�1E� I'�9� `.�ill�ie.� �f��7 - 4 •1s ���c�t�y Yi' c.�4i+8%- &Is7;a�g'/.'deep x%-iwide bwmi TI.11. 4tn' 6 12- o.c. �x1er Shlplap -p+,l�/.'�+-• . Y .x�/r�p fit, �icy�;.@y448%- �qy/.'ydeeeepx'A-wideL q� QT1 .SSapw](608' o.e. Shlpplappay 9ts7� 3. l�+' w'r1Ch@"./wt7 :0.'►_reo'3Li�nT4R"Smi6S+�ei'�J'r•Ti1'NNi��`CI.1EfiWpt4S1Rf7�,r.Pq:1fl�.6R'CfY 50YS�aitiYG' .liTi+r 6 Types of plywooa siding acceptable. Vertical installation desired. Rough sawn exterior preferred. �l tmj�1�JkM2�Y hlnes. h ' I-ands Desired roofing materials. h akes? Some types.of tiles acceptable 1PkAW11.;a<. .•<. i x ',.;t ;*�-+�.�,,,' -� depending on shape and color. .rJ j ,�e C6 ce -� n D �, • N o �� � } � [� � fit. . �, �•�.. i Y ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL FILM 82P.IcEv7b4 The undersigned, the duly elected and acting Assessor of Gallatin County, Montana, hereby approves the name CPPC - EAST after having found that such name is not the same as, similar to or pronounced the same as a word in the name of any other. property or subdivision in Gallatin County, Montana, and therefore complies with §70-23-304, MCA. Dated this p?6 day of 198y. 01 Gallatin County Assessor ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL The undersigned, the duly elected and acting Assessor of Gallatin County, i Montana, hereby approves the Declaration of CPPC EAST, after having found i that the taxes and assessments clue and payable for the said CPPC - EAST have been paid to date. Dated this.Z G day of 198 S✓. i Gallatin County Assessor PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE NOTIFIED OF THE COLLEGE PARK PROFESSIONAL CENTER - EAST LA14D USE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AMENDMENTS: President's Office Montana State'University Bozeman, MT 59715 Dr. P. Brian Rogers 1727 W. College St. Bozeman, MT 59715 Mr. James Drummond First Security Bank 208 E. Main Bozeman, MT 59715 Mr. Scott Heck Security Title Company 12 N. 3rd Ave. Bozeman, MT 59715 f Gallatin County Commissioners County Courthouse Bozeman, MT 59715 Mr. Dennis Schweitzer Schweitzer Partnership P.O. Box 1222 Bozeman, MT 59715 � i BOZEMAIO CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE BOZEMAN 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE CITY-COUNTY P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 PLANNNG OFFICE PHONE:(406)586-3321 Ext 227 November 7, 1990 Mr. James W. Kack 6531 Jackson Creek Road Bozeman , MT 59715 Dear Jim: By letters dated October 9 and October 30, 1990, you have requested that I approve certain "minor modifications" to the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) for College Park Professional Center ' East (CPPC - East) . The modifications include changing the form of ownership within the PUD ( from condominium ownership to deeded ownership of platted lots) , and a change in the propsed configuration of buildings ( from"up to five" to three, with the third building being two-story with a footprint of just under 7,000 square feet) . Several other modifications were also shown on a revised conceptual site plan which accompanied your request, including the location and number of parking spaces , and a cut-across service road connecting the two legs of the private drive. On October 30, 1990, the Design Review Board (DRB) of the City of Bozeman reviewed your proposed revisions at a regularly scheduled meeting . I had requested that the DRB look at the proposal and provide me with some direction as to whether the changes would alter the intent of the Land Use Development Guidelines which were integral to the approval of the PUD. (Please refer to my memo to the DRB dated October 30, 1990. ) After evaluating the revised conceptual site plan and attendant elevations of the proposed two-story building, the DRB unanimously -concl_uded that the requested modifications, with one exception , would not change the character of the PUD or alter the intent of the developmental guidelines. The exception was the cut-across service road referred to above. . . the consensus here was that said road would interfere with the function of the open space, which was an integral design element of the original PUD approval . In finding that the othe.r requested modifications would not alter the intent of the approved PUD, the DRB noted that the revised site plan would : 1 ) increase the total amount of open space on the property; 2) reduce the overall floor-area-ratio of the property; 3) not exceed allowable height limits; and 4 ) , - incorporate a compatible architectural style. It was also noted , with regard to the height of the two-story building , that it would be located on a portion of the lot which is four to six feet lower than the front of the lot, thereby mitigating any Mr. James - Kack November 7, 1990 page 2 of 2 impact caused by the additional height. Therefore, in accordance with the SUMMARY section of the- Land Use Developmental Guidelines, I hereby approve the requested modifications pertaining to site and building design and PUD ownership, with the exception of the above-referenced cut-across service road, which is not an approved minor modification . To effectuate these modifications, you must now revise the Land Use Developmental Guidelines, including . the Intent Statement, Declaration of By-Laws, Legal Description, Site Plan, and any other relevant sections, to reflect these changes. Please be advised that the Legal Description section will need to be accomplished through a Minor Subdivision PUD platting procedure, subject to review and approval of the Director of Public Service. Title to any of the resultant tracts may not be transferred until the Minor Subdivision PUD is approved and recorded in the Clerk and Recorder' s office. The Site Plan revisions will need to be depicted on a revised Master Plan. Should any future owners of properties within the PUD wish to pursue the option of developing the cut-across service road , they may do so by applying for review and approval through the Conditional Use Permit process. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Andrew C. Epple, fA#WL Planning Director cc : Mr. Frank Cikan Mr. Terry Povah i C) • !27E Application No. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN R E V I E W City-County Planning Office 35 N. Bozeman Avenue Box 640 BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 / (406) 586-3321 , ext. 227 Date �g. The undersigned eb makes-a1 ' ion for a Major Minor Amended Site Plan Co Tonal Use Permit ursuant to the requirements of Section 18.52 and/or Section 18.53 of the Ci y of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 1. Nameof project/development Co LLCGE 10A0,K PRo F6_SS IoWAL C C`NTC E AST 2. Address of Subject Property 170 5 — 17/ l W , Co LLC (5 C S T 3. Legal Description Ameocg> PLA-r or coL.Li=6E PA-P-4 WOPESs,oNAL C97K)'-rvk-EAsr �} Pt�.O focc-�c( �n SkJ Sic 12 1 s�, o�S �SE PMM C�-iY o� zL 4. Name and Address of Developer AME"S Lo. 1.(ALK_ (os3 i JACKSoQ CZee< ':RoAD ---3o7'_ iMA . �'[TTeI : 5� 7-9 88 5. Name and Address of Property Owner CSAYV,C- Tel : 6. Name and Address of Engineer/Architect/Planner 3ERQ-f GAS TO�J '-61157-00 E:Q&t JEERitJG - Zoio 0- -7`y Adr. 3ozk-_ i ,eA�-)K ci K4N1 :4Pc441 rE_e-- T SHE E. ��lE1Jo�1.PF{f}� -sure 'BozE4A-t,2 7. Current Zoning iZ-o Land Area sgft. 4 3 acres 8. Project/Development to consist of: - ( S1'o�y o-�CcCe butlan95 _ANAL STokZ oFFicE V IL-z>toG . i This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and fifteen (15) copies of a site plan drawn to scale on paper not larger than 24"x36" and including all information listed on attached sheet (Submittal Information) and specified 'in Section 18.52.030 of the Zoning Ordinance. Y APPLICATION IS NOT COMPLETE WITHOUT APPROPRIATE SIGNATURES APPLICANT CERTIFICATE: I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. / -'� ApplRca s-Signature PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATE: As owner of record of the above-described property, I hereby certify that I do, not oppose the submittal of this application, and would not object to the proposed use of said property as described herein. Property Owner Signature .:y SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The required data to be shown on -all major and minor site plans shall include, but is not limited to, the following: A. General Information 1. name of project/development; 2. location of project/development by street address; 3. location map, including area within one-half mile of site; 4. name and mailing address of developer and owner; 5. name and mailing address of engineer/architect, landscape architect and/or planner; 6. date of plan preparation and changes; 7. north point indicator; 8. suggested scale of 1" to 20' , but not less than 1" to 100' ; 9. list of names and addresses of property owners within two hundred (200) feet of site, using last declared County real estate tax records; 10. stamped, unsealed envelopes addressed with names of above property owners, and 11. zoning classification within two hundred (200) feet. B. Site Plan Information 1 . boundary line of property with dimensions; 2. location, identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, to a distance of 100 feet outside site plan boundary unless otherwise stated: a. topographic contours at a minimum interval of two feet, or as determined by the Planning Director b. adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet, except for sites adjacent to major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet C. on-site streets and rights-of-way d. ingress and egress points i e. traffic flow on-site f. traffic flow off-site g. utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: (1) electric I (2) natural gas (3) telephone, cable TV (4) water (5) sewer (sanitary, treated effluent and storm) h. buildings and structures i . parking facilities, including bicycle racks j. water bodies, and wetlands. k. surface water holding ponds, streams and ,irrigation ditches 1. grading and drainage plan M. significant rock outcroppings n. sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways o. provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to wheel chair ramps, parking spaces, hand rails, and curb cuts P. fences and walls q. exterior signs r. exterior refuse collection areas . S. exterior lighting t. landscaping (detailed plan showing plantings, equipment, and other appropriate information subject to Section 18.50. 100) i (1) botanical and common names of vegetation to be used (2) size of plantings at time of planting and at maturity (3) areas to be irrigated 3. number of employee and non-employee parking spaces, existing and proposed, and total square footage of each. 4. site statistics including site square footage, non-residential building square footage, percent of site coverage (building and parking), net dwelling unit density, percent park or open space. (over) • • J 5. a reproducible copy of the site plan with appropriate signatures shall be submitted upon approval . C. Building Information (on-Site) 1. Building elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s) or structure(s). 2. Materials to be used. The applicant is encouraged to consider the effect of color in creating a design character that is appropriate for and compatible with the area. 3. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area. D. Permits a 1. A listing of all required and applicable permits and status of applications. i .;_. IIIIIHIM n 1 /•;�n 11 �:! IIIIIII •:�� i��IIIIIIIIIiiI �Illlllj.:� i:,l�� Illloa 1I ��IIIIIIIIII �IIIIIIIIIIIII fl ' :1M IIIIIII''� iummallo ,.lulu::• ;•r • 1,:. 11.w � : � ;: �`�'i`'-�'•°' 'IIIIII %. sm; it •' III ll r�i t:, ':�- \IIII♦.••-' !�IIIIIIIIIII �• :;1:; ::;�!+.� IIIIIY",_� ��_ ■ 111111111=•!_. ��'__�'•:': I '; ��IIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIII '�'y li{�I 11- II nllllllll SIP.- �IIIIII'' ► •�' I_em fr� is IIII'M■ri I� � C,is� :• -• tn- •;i;°, 11 IL •.' .•• IIIII, 01 01