HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-14-23 Public Comment - C. Omland - Canyon Gate - Truman Flats - 23148, Site Plan CommentsFrom:Chris Omland
To:Agenda
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Canyon Gate - Truman Flats - 23148, Site Plan Comments
Date:Sunday, November 5, 2023 7:22:24 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
In the best interest of Bozeman's residents and their well-being, it is imperative that we closely
examine the proposed Truman Flats development within the context of the Bozeman GrowthPolicy. This policy underscores the significance of conserving habitat, maintaining the
integrity of existing neighborhoods, and offering new housing options that align with the city'sobjectives.
My remarks in this letter primarily pertain to the review criteria outlined as follows:
Conformance with the growth policy (38.230.100. A.1.)
Compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood identity, architectural design,landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings, and visual integration (38.230.100.
A.7.a.)Unfortunately, Truman Flats falls short in numerous aspects. Its approach to preserving the
natural landscape and local bird habitat is lacking, exemplified by the removal of all 150mature trees, which stands in stark contrast to the policy's vision of harmonious coexistence
with nature.
Additionally, the design of Truman Flats does not integrate well with the existingneighborhood. The proposed buildings feature uninspiring architecture, resembling typical
suburban structures, a far cry from the vision of the Bozeman Growth Policy, and failing toreflect the area's agrarian history and majestic surroundings.
Moreover, the absence of awnings on the buildings will likely lead to increased energy
consumption for heating and cooling, an unsustainable and unnecessary outcome. Thedisparity between HomeBase's stated design intent and their actions in removing every tree on
the property is disheartening and contradicts their promises of "wooded surroundings" and a"picturesque setting."
It is crucial to question who truly benefits from such a development, and it is evident that
Bozeman's residents are not reaping the rewards. The city staff has an opportunity to addressthese shortcomings, and we remain hopeful that they will consider the following site plan
review criteria:
Compatibility with the Immediate Environment: Truman Flats' design does not harmonizewith the architectural style or scale of the surrounding neighborhood, creating an imposing
presence. This contradicts the city's objective to maintain a residential feel.
Variation in Roofline: The flat-roofed buildings do not contribute to the aesthetic diversity ofthe area. Introducing more distinctive rooflines will help Truman Flats blend in with
neighboring structures, which feature a range of heights and roof styles.
Step-backs and Building Segmentation: Implementing step-backs of at least 10 feet on each
end of the two buildings would mitigate their plain appearance and mirror the natural contoursof the nearby mountains. Breaking the development into smaller buildings would improve
compatibility and enhance the circulation of light and air.
It's essential to remember that these changes are not solely about aesthetics; they are aboutcreating a neighborhood that respects its history, preserves its natural beauty, and benefits its
residents. With a few thoughtful design adjustments, Truman Flats could genuinely reflect thevalues and vision of the Bozeman Growth Policy while providing residents with the
harmonious and sustainable community they genuinely deserve.
Sincerely,Chris Omland
Long-time Bozeman resident & concerned citizen