HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-16-23 Public Comment - C. Nylander - Comments for City Commission Meeting on October 17, 2023From:Charlie Nylander
To:Agenda
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Comments for City Commission Meeting on October 17, 2023
Date:Monday, October 16, 2023 3:59:45 PM
Attachments:Odinance 2149 Provisional Adoption 2.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please find my comments attached as a PDF Word document regarding tomorrow nights meeting of the City
Commission. My attached comments are specific to the Agenda H. Item; i.e. Comments on Ordinance 2149,Provisional Adoption of the Short Term Rentals Text Amendment, Application 23281-George. Thank you forensuring that my comments are distributed in the City Commission packets. Thank you.
Charles Nylander2164 W Ironwood View PlTucson, Arizona. 85742cdnylander@comcast.net505-470-7230
October 16, 2023
To: Bozeman City Commission
From: Charles Nylander
Subject: City Commission Meeting on October 17, 2023; Agenda Item H:
Comments on Ordinance 2149, Provisional Adoption of the Short
Term Rentals Text Amendment, Application 23281
I recommend that the City Commission not adopt the proposed amendments, or in the
alternative adopt the following staff alternative regarding the subject agenda item, i.e:
“Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific request to staff
to supply additional information or to address specific items”. I offer the following
reasons and personal insight to support this recommendation.
Background
I have enjoyed the summer use of Short Term Rentals (STRs) in Bozeman for the past
eight (8) years. All of my STR rentals were located within walking distance of
downtown on both the east and west sides of Main Street. The length of stay for my
STR rentals started with one week, but gradually increased, with the last two years
length of stay increasing to six (6) and seven (7) weeks in duration, respectively. My
STR costs have ranged from as low as $1600.00/week to $6,000.00/month. At first my
STRs were simple, remodeled (1930’s era) cottages, but my last two STRs were much
newer condominiums along Mendenhall and Bozeman Avenues.
Reasons
1). I have read all of the online documents associated with the above subject, and wish
to point out several facts contained in the Final Report “Short-Term Rental Assessment
prepared by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. August 1, 2023. There are a plethora
of facts with strong implications in this report, most of which appear to not have been
adequately considered in preparing ordinance amendments. For example:
A) “In Bozeman, 55 percent of households are renters and 45 percent are owners.”…
I would attribute the higher renter percentage to the presence of a population of
university students and very modest local incomes that preclude home ownership.
B) “The average rent in Bozeman is $1,900.00 per month…which has increased by an
average of 4.0 percent annually.” Supply and demand results in increased
rents, and employment salaries are too low, in addition to the present inflation.
C) “In total, there are an estimated 568 short-term rentals currently in Bozeman.
with about 22,500 housing units in Bozeman, this means that short-term
rentals comprise 2.5 percent of the city’s total housing stock.” It would appear
that the subject STR proposal represents targeted regulation resulting in
Draconian regulatory measures applied solely to 2.5 percent of the housing units.
It makes a person wonder if there is an alternative ambition or agenda at play.
D) “Short-term rentals are classified into three types:
1) 19 percent of registered short-term rentals are classified as Type 1
2) 46 percent of registered short-term rentals are classified as Type 2
3) 35 percent of registered short-term rentals are classified as Type 3”
The subject ordinance amendments would eliminate Type 3 and a large
portion of Type 2 due to the increased owner 70 percent residency requirement.
E) “On average, the assessed value of short-term rentals is 48 percent higher
than housing units overall in Bozeman. The median assessed value of a
short-term rental is also 49 percent higher than the median assessed value
of a housing unit in Bozeman.” It would appear that STRs indeed pay an
almost 50 percent higher amount of property tax in Bozeman than other housing
units. How will approval of this ordinance proposal affect property tax revenue?
F) “Short-term rentals are a significant part of the lodging inventory. STRs comprise
43 percent of the overall bed base (in terms of room count), while hotels comprise
57 percent. In terms of units, STRs comprise 19 percent of the lodging inventory.”
How will the shortfall of lodging inventory affect tourism and the local economy?
G) “Tourism and lodging activity has increased substantially in Bozeman over the
past decade. From 2012 to 2022, lodging tax revenue grew by 250 percent,
although the vast majority of this growth occurred in 2012 and 2022.” Has the
City Commission considered the economic impact of decreased property and
lodging tax income, in addition to the lost business income from tourism? Has
the City Commission considered the economic impact of lost employment that
will result if the subject ordinance is approved?
2.) The 23281 Staff Report for the Short Term Rentals Text Amendment Ordinance
2149 only lists the fiscal effects as:
“The proposed prohibition of Type 3 short term rentals in all zoning districts
would result in a decrease in annual STR permit fee revenues, which currently go
towards staff time used to review such permits and the annual cost of the STR
software.”
I would suggest that the staff be instructed to complete a more thorough fiscal impact
analysis, that at a minimum, would include the impacts of: decreases in lodging tax;
property tax; tourism; local business; employment opportunities; and sales tax
revenue. The prohibition of Type 3 STRs and modification of the owner residency
requirements for Type 2 STRs will have a significant fiscal and economic impact in
Bozeman.
3.) After spending significant time in Bozeman over the past eight (8) years, I have
interacted with dozens of local residents, some of whom are good friends that
permanently relocated to Bozeman. I have a full appreciation of the local economy,
prevailing employment opportunities, and salary ranges. I deeply appreciate
the sentiments of Bozeman residents who grew up in Bozeman and now find it
very difficult to afford to live in their own hometown. At the prevailing salary
ranges in Bozeman, the increasing cost to purchase a home, and the increased
cost of rentals, the local residents do indeed feel squeezed out of their
own town. I have deep empathy for this feeling because I spent my life in Santa Fe,
New Mexico, a city that depends on tourism and government for employment,
much like Bozeman. I believe if the subject ordinance is approved, the affect on
local residents will be mostly negative, not positive. STRs that make up 2.5 percent
of the housing units in Bozeman are not causing the myriad of problems faced by
the residents of Bozeman. Since governments regulate, it’s automatic to assume a
revised regulation will solve the problem. But, what is the problem to be solved?
The 2.5 percent of housing brings in tax income, sales income, employment, and
wages. If these benefits are eliminated or constrained, Bozeman will be the loser
and the myriad of real Bozeman salary and property problems will not be solved.
I request that you either don’t pass the subject proposal or you continue the
public process and instruct staff to address the missing economic
information highlighted above.
After reading all the relevant documents, I believe this is an unnecessary
and ill-justified regulatory amendment. If approved it will result in negative
impacts for Bozeman, and most likely invite a class-action lawsuit by the STR Type
2 and 3 owners, who will most likely prevail. Please fully consider the resulting
consequences if you do intend to approve such a targeted and unnecessary
regulatory prohibition.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments,