Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-10-23 Public Comment - M. & M. Hamilton - Recently proposed zoning changes to the historical districtFrom:MartyMary Hamilton To:Agenda Subject:[EXTERNAL]Recently proposed zoning changes to the historical district Date:Friday, October 6, 2023 10:43:11 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Bozeman City Commission, We oppose adoption of the recently revised Urban (or Unified) Development Code (UDC). The city should not impose such sudden drastic zoning changes. We recommend a more deliberate and considered evaluation of the issues and of the effects on individual homeowners. We urge the city to resist the one-size-fits-all, micromanagement edicts from the legislative and administrative branches of the Montana state government. Downgrading the few acres in Bozeman’s historic district will do little toward solving the housing crisis in Gallatin County. We have lived in our present home since early 1971. Initially, the house was in bad shape and the VA wouldn’t approve a loan unless we fixed things. So we rented the house, then worked hard at repairing and painting. Within the year we secured a VA-approved loan. Over the 52 years since, we steadily have invested our time and money in improving the property. At each step we met Bozeman City’s stringent requirements. Our efforts were recognized. In 1998, the Bozeman Historic Preservation Advisory Board gave us a Historic Preservation Award for Excellence in the category of Compatible Accessory Structure. This year, we received rebates from the city for completion of a landscaping investment that replaced turf with xeriscape. Until now, the City consistently signaled that our efforts were improving the community. But the City now appears to forget those signals. The City Commission’s proposed zoning change to Bozeman’s historic district is an unconscionable reversal of policy. It discourages historic preservation and diminishes our half century of investment in the community. Our well-intentioned efforts and prudent investments will have been for naught. That scenario is heartbreaking. Based on recent conversations, it is clear that our neighbors will be harmed similarly by the abrupt change in direction imposed by the UDC. Please consider the negative effects of the policy reversals you are proposing. They will reduce Bozeman’s long-recognized ambiance by diminishing a major historical attribute. They will subdue the positive community spirit that makes Bozeman so appealing. How can the Commission expect future cooperation from Bozeman residents if it suddenly reverses critical long-standing policies? Don’t do that. Instead, we ask that you take the time required to arrive at fair and just policies, to fight state government overreach, and to preserve the widely heralded social/environmental fabric of Bozeman. (376 words) Sincerely, Martin and Mary Hamilton 309 S 6th Ave