HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-04-23 Public Comment - K. Hetherington - Transportation Planning10/4/23, 3:12 PM about:blank
about:blank 1/3
Customer Submission #CS-23-667 Open
Created on October 3, 2023 by Kathryn Hetherington
Print
Description
Some years ago, I easily found all the commissioners email addresses and sent them each an email. Apparently, they don't want to be
contacted with ease anymore. I can reach my US legislators more easily. I submitted a letter to the editor in 2021 for a friend twice (she is
in a wheelchair) and it was not published. In years past, the prior editor published all letters unless there was something naughty or
incorrect. Now, it is almost worthless to send a letter with a conservative viewpoint, so we have basically lost our free speech in the
media. So I am gong to send the letter to the commissioners for a response. Since this letter was written, 1) tra ic problems have soared
2) gridlock is more common 3) drivers are racing through red lights possibly due to being frustrated with tra ic 4) Billings has completed
the next north south trunk west of Shiloh with huge round-a-bouts 5) Davies/Fowler has been on the map for, what, 15 years- and now
finally, it is on the table -I think 6) the new development on the NW side of Davies is approved, but Davies should be 4 lanes before that
construction begins (will it?) guessing the answer is NO. You are improving Baxter but it's closed for a year? Why can we not be ahead of
development like Billings, instead of 25 years behind ? Your roads are failing!
Messages (2)Assigned to
Mike Maas
(Deactivated)
Collaborator/s
None
Due By
10/06/2023
Submission
Age
1 Day Attachments
1
Messages
0
Internal Notes
0
Tasks
0
Source
Internal by Kathryn
Hetherington
Category
Public Comment
Department
Clerk's Office
Customer Name
Kathryn Hetherington
Customer Email
kathrynjhetherington@gmail.com
Cell Phone
-
10/4/23, 3:12 PM about:blank
about:blank 2/3
Clayton Galloway <BozemanMT@customerportal.help>10/03/2023 08:54pm Email
Issue # CS-23-667: We've received your feedback!
Hello Kathryn Hetherington,
Thank you for your feedback (CS-23-667). We're glad you reached out to the City of Bozeman. Your feedback has been received and is being routed to
the appropriate City staff! If your feedback requires follow-up please expect an answer within 3 business days.
Thank you.
Clayton Galloway
Bozeman, MT
121 North Rouse Avenue
This email is in reference to issue CS-23-667 (CRM-FQ5pHt4Ip). In case of any queries, you can respond to this email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Bozeman, MT
121 North Rouse Avenue , Bozeman, MT 59715
Mike Maas 10/04/2023 03:08pm Email
Issue # CS-23-667: We've received your feedback!
Good a ernoon,
Your public comment has been received and will be distributed to the City Commission and sta for review.
Thank you,
--
Mike Maas, MPA| City Clerk
City of Bozeman | 121 N. Rouse Ave. | Bozeman, MT 59715
D: 406.582.2321 | C: 406.599.0804
10/4/23, 3:12 PM about:blank
about:blank 3/3
This email is in reference to issue CS-23-667 (CRM-FQ5pHt4Ip). In case of any queries, you can respond to this email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Bozeman, MT
121 North Rouse Avenue , Bozeman, MT 59715
Hello Kathryn Hetherington,
Thank you for your feedback (CS-23-667). We're glad you reached out to the City of Bozeman. Your feedback has been received and is being routed to
the appropriate City staff! If your feedback requires follow-up please expect an answer within 3 business days.
Thank you.
Clayton Galloway
Bozeman, MT
121 North Rouse Avenue
This email is in reference to issue CS-23-667 (CRM-FQ5pHt4Ip). In case of any queries, you can respond to this email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Bozeman, MT
121 North Rouse Avenue , Bozeman, MT 59715
Letter to the Editor
Bozeman Daily Chronicle
2820 W College St
Bozeman, MT 59718
The commission has added to the city’s top priorities, climate action (just how much money that
might be, we will never know (generally 30% extra for a new building), and with little to no effect)
but I don’t see infrastructure listed as one of the 7 priorities. Transportation in this city is a
nightmare, and gridlock will continue and will increase because the city commissioners refuse to
build 4 lane roads. We have seen the failure of the round-a-bout on Ferguson. Take a look at
the county’s round-about on Baxter and Love for a successful venture. Done on time. Why
does Oak still narrow from 5 lanes to 2 lanes west of 19th when Oak is supposed to be 4 lanes--
causing traffic to back up to 27th at times. It is time to finish Oak as planned and yes, that will
mean ripping out trees and sidewalks by the retirement facility. How could that have possibly
been approved? Who approved it? Do they still have a job? Why does the city never do roads
right in the first place? They build a partial road until they can assess the next builder/developer
with the remaining road cost. They build 2 lane roads and then expand to 3 lanes (still just a 2
lane road with an expensive turning lane) which always costs more than just doing it right in the
first place. Maybe the commissioners should visit Billings and drive the new Shiloh Road, 4
lanes with 9 round-a bouts – built before development, and completed, done, finished. They
should ask Billings how they can stay ahead of development rather than 20 years behind.