HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230809 - Sustainability Advisory Board - Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Protection Plan Work Session #2Gallatin Valley Sensitive
Lands Protection Plan
Connecting our Landscape, Heritage, and Future on Common Ground
Sustainability Citizen Advisory Board Work Session | August 9, 2023
Guiding Questions
•What are the key considerations for the identified themes as it
relates to climate change (e.g., wildlife & biodiversity,
connectivity, agricultural heritage, water quality & quantity)?
•How should the data and tools be used to inform decisions
related to the Bozeman Climate Plan?
Project Goals
•Secure the long-term ecological health of the region
•Create a regional model that connects clean water, abundant
wildlife, productive agricultural, and cultural heritage
•Recommend how to protect the most sensitive resources during
unprecedented growth
•Identify benefits and best practices in development in harmony
with the natural environment
•Facilitate dialogue between city, county, agencies, constituents,
and developers
Project Schedule
Working Group Meetings/Input
Who We Are Hearing From
What We Have Heard
Working Group Partnerships
Working Group
-Provide project guidance
-Sounding board for methods and plan content
-Work towards a cohesive goal
Gallatin Valley Sensitive
Lands Study Area
Planning Process
Model Approach
Geospatial modeling
combines analytical
procedures to produce
maps that provide
insights to guide
decision-making.
Mode l Themes
GVSL Model Results
These lands contain important
wildlife habitat and plant
communities that contribute to an
intact and diverse Greater
Yellowstone ecosystem. Keystone
species, such as elk and western
slope cutthroat, require the healthy
and cohesive habitats on these
lands. Wildlife relies on the
Gallatin Valley for food,
reproduction, and critical winter
range.
Importance of different wildlife species by Gallatin Valley residents’:
Deer, elk, moose, and other ungulates (61%)
Native fish and aquatic species (57%)
Endangered, threatened, or rare species (grizzly bears, Canada lynx, etc.)
(35%)
GVSL Model Results
These working lands provide food
and livestock production to
maintain the community’s historic
economic base. Lands also provide
open space that helps maintain the
unique sense of place and provides
space for wildlife movement and
winter wildlife habitat. This land is
typically privately owned and public
access is limited.
Gallatin Valley residents noted the following concerning
protecting working farms and ranches:
Supporting local food production (71%)
Conserving native plants and wildlife habitat -grasslands,
wetlands, riparian areas (50%)
Supporting local livestock production (49%)
GVSL Model Results
These lands facilitate ecological
interactions and the movement of
wildlife to food, shelter reproduction,
clean water, and critical winter
ranges. Corridors centered around
water are often limited in
development potential.
Residents are concerned with increasing winter range throughout the
southern Bozeman Valley and western Bridger Front, protecting the
connectivity between wildlife habitats, and maintaining movement and
migration corridors throughout the Valley.
GVSL Model Results
Water systems integrate with all
other themes as natural water
features (wetlands, riparian areas,
lakes, streams, and rivers) provide
critical habitat and connectivity for
aquatic species and wildlife
populations, clean drinking water,
and resiliency to natural disasters
and climate change.
Benefits of protecting water quality by Gallatin Valley Residents:
Access to clean drinking water (67%)
Wildlife habitat diversity (49%)
Native fish populations (38%)
Access to water for farm and ranch irrigation (38%)
Resiliency to natural disasters and changing climate (ex.
Wetland areas can mitigate the impacts of flooding) (38%)
GVSL Model Themes and Inputs
Development Constraints
The green areas represent lands that are
less likely to be developed:
–Slopes Over 25%
–Floodplain
–Conservation Easements, Managed
Areas, and Protected Areas
Development Threats and Pressures Overlays
Red areas
represent
high
disturbance
Red areas
represent
approved
developments
Interactive Map
gallatinvalleyplan.bozeman.net
Sensitive Lands Protection Tools Overview
Preliminary Protection Tools
What are the Protection Tools?
-A variety of strategies that can be used to protect sensitive lands that were
identified in the model results to achieve our collective vision.
How will the Protection Tools be used?
-Collaboration is key! Implemented by various partners including the County,
municipalities, non-profits, and other agencies
-Include a variety of implantation strategies (policy updates, education,
special projects, etc.) and funding sources.
Preliminary Protection Tools
Types of Tools Being Reviewed:
-Countywide Planning and Land Use Measures (Cluster development, Buffers,
Integration of the sensitive lands mapping)
-Best Practices (Wildlife friendly signage and fencing, dark skies)
-Water Quality Projects (Wetland banking, Floodplain Mapping, septic/sewer)
-Staffing and funding
Implementation Methods:
-Education
-Incentives
-Programs
-Capital Improvements
-Land Use Code Updates
-Legislative Initiatives
-Partnerships
Protection Tool Recommendation Example
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT
Recommending Plan/Source:
County Growth Policy (2021), Protecting Wetlands (2008)
Current Use:
Yes, County has some districts that allow
Overview:
Conservation-oriented development, also known as cluster
development, refers to a design process where the design
of the development is driven through ecological-based
planning to conserve the land with the highest resource
values and minimize vegetation loss, habitat
fragmentation, and increase connectivity……
Case Studies:
Missoula, MT
Implementation
Methods:☒Incentive ▢Education▢Program ☒Code Updates▢Capital ▢Legislative
Roles:☒County ☒City ▢Non -profit ☒State/Local
Themes
Next Steps
August –September: Development of
Draft Plan with Working Group
October: Reviewing and Commenting
on the Draft Plan (Virtual Meeting and
Online Opportunities to Comment)
December: Acceptance Hearings
Open Participation:
gallatinvalleyplan.bozeman.net
Guiding Questions
•What are the key considerations for the identified themes as it
relates to climate change (e.g., wildlife & biodiversity,
connectivity, agricultural heritage, water quality & quantity)?
•How should the data and tools be used to inform decisions
related to the Bozeman Climate Plan?