HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-07-23 Public Comment - E. Clark - STRCommissioners:
I have been following the latest Ordinance on Short Term Rentals (STRs) and was quite relieved that the
last one passed with modifications. While I fully support measures to enforce the process that has been
set forth to manage STRs, I understand that now there is a new thrust to create additional rules or
perhaps a new process? Why is this necessary? Why are you continuing to discuss STRs? If those who
have not been following the process are managed why are those of us who are following- and have
followed- the process for many years being punished? This seems contrary to the original intent which
was to manage those who are not in compliance with the City’s process?
I am a retired Federal employee living in Bozeman. I have a duplex townhouse which I use as a vacation
rental to supplement my retirement income. It is a source of revenue I rely on as everything gets more
expensive in Bozeman, including property taxes. I’ve done this legally and responsibly for many years.
I’ve followed all the “rules” and have a management company which provides 24hr service to monitor
things. I feel I am exercising my right as a property owner on a fixed income. I have bear-proof trash
containers and do not allow parties or large groups. I do not allow howling dogs, trailers or guests with
more cars than allowed. In many ways, my property is better managed than others in my neighborhood.
I have had long term rentals at other times and will not go that route ever again as the damage to
property is far greater even with the best tenants. That would also negate my use of my property. STRs
allow me flexibility to use my property as I choose, which is a property owner’s right. I also feel vacation
rentals are a wonderful way to experience a community and provide an alternative to hotels. Whenever
we travel, we use them as a cost-effective interesting way to experience a community. Hotels serve a
purpose but lack the uniqueness of a home and neighborhood. My property offers a different
experience. I think guests should be able to choose, and likely would not come to Bozeman if that was
the only alternative. I also employ a property manager providing financial opportunities within the
community, bed tax to the city and services like fishing guiding.
I realize Bozeman has a housing shortage, but removing STRs is not a solution to that problem. They are
investments not unlike stocks and bonds. They are a source of income for those on fixed incomes in
retirement, providing those visiting the community with an alternative lodging experience. They are
obviously popular. Why not consider them assets to the community and its senior members?