HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-18-23 - Downtown Urban Renewal District Board - Agendas & Packet MaterialsA.Call meeting to order
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89926274828?pwd=UVhRZEpiODR0amxlSlRscUpET0Jydz09
Passcode: 461030
Or One tap mobile :
US: +16699006833,,89926274828#,,,,*461030# or +17193594580,,89926274828#,,,,*461030#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 719 359 4580 or +1 253 205 0468 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346
248 7799 or +1 669 444 9171 or +1 507 473 4847 or +1 564 217 2000 or +1 646 931 3860 or
+1 689 278 1000 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 305 224 1968 or +1 309 205
3325 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 360 209 5623 or +1 386 347 5053
Webinar ID: 899 2627 4828
Passcode: 461030
B.Disclosures
C.Changes to the Agenda
D.Public Service Announcements
E.Approval of Minutes
E.1 Approve March Board Meeting Minutes.(Staley)
F.Consent Agenda
G.Public Comment
This is the time to comment on any matter falling within the scope of the Downtown Urban
Renewal District Board. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public
THE DOWNTOWN AREA URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT BOARD OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
DURD AGENDA
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
1
comment relating to that item but you may only speak once per topic.
Please note, the Board cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All
persons addressing the Board shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the
audience shall be respectful of others. Please state your name and place of residence in an audible
tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three minutes.
H.Special Presentation
I.Action Items
I.1 Downtown URD FY24 Work Plan & Budget Approval (Staley)
J.FYI/Discussion
J.1 Executive Director's April 2023 Report.(Staley)
K.Adjournment
For more information please contact Ellie Staley, Downtown Bozeman Partnership,
ellie@downtownbozeman.org
This board generally meets the 3rd Tuesday of the month from 12:00 to 1:30pm
Citizen Advisory Board meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and
require assistance, please contact our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray at 406-582-3232 (TDD 406-582-
2301).
In order for this Board to receive all relevant public comment in time for this meeting, please submit via
the Commission Comment Page or by emailing agenda@bozeman.net no later than 12:00 PM on the
day of the meeting. Public comment may be made in person at the meeting as well.
2
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Downtown Area Urban Renewal District Board
FROM:Ellie Staley, Executive Director Downtown Bozeman Partnership
SUBJECT:Approve March Board Meeting Minutes.
MEETING DATE:April 18, 2023
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:Approve
STRATEGIC PLAN:7.3 Best Practices, Creativity & Foresight: Utilize best practices, innovative
approaches, and constantly anticipate new directions and changes relevant
to the governance of the City. Be also adaptable and flexible with an
outward focus on the customer and an external understanding of the issues
as others may see them.
BACKGROUND:Board to review and approve March Board Meeting Minutes.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None
ALTERNATIVES:None.
FISCAL EFFECTS:None.
Attachments:
Draft Downtown URD March 2023 Minutes.pdf
Report compiled on: March 15, 2023
3
Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, March 21, 2023
Page 1 of 2
THE CITY COMMMISSION MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
MINUTES
March 21, 2023
A) 00:00:07 Call meeting to order - 12:00 p.m.
Present: Nick Zelver, Barbara Bear, Marley McKenna, Jake Van Dusen, Suzi Berget White, Tony
Renslow, Ellie Staley, Cyndy Andrus, Emily Cope
Absent: None
Excused: Aaron Parker
B) 00:00:11 Disclosures
C) 00:00:22 Changes to the Agenda
D) 00:01:07 Public Service Announcements
E) 00:01:15 Approval of Minutes
E.1 00:01:20 Approve February Board Meeting Minutes and March 2 "Special
Meeting" Minutes
URD Minutes 2-23.pdf
URD Minutes Special Meeting 3-23.pdf
00:02:29 Motion to approve Move to approve the February Board Meeting Minutes and March Special
Meeting minutes.
Tony Renslow: Motion
Marley McKenna: 2nd
00:01:20 Vote on the Motion to approve Move to approve the February Board Meeting Minutes and
March Special Meeting minutes. The Motion carried 6 - 0.
Approve:
Nick Zelver
4
Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, March 21, 2023
Page 2 of 2
Barbara Bear
Marley McKenna
Jake Van Dusen
Suzi Berget White
Tony Renslow
Disapprove:
None
F) 00:02:37 Public Comment
G) 00:03:11 Action Items
G.1 00:03:16 Downtown URD FY24 Work Plan & Budget Discussion
FY2024 URD Work Plan-Budget_DRAFT.pdf
FY24 DURD Budget - DRAFT v.1.pdf
00:03:17 Ellie Staley presented the FY24 work plan and budget.
H) 00:27:16 FYI/Discussion
H.1 00:28:33 Executive Director's March 2023 Report
Alley design_draft.pdf
Downtown Parklet Assessment Report FINAL 020823.pdf
N BLACK POCKET PARK CONCEPTS_081822.pdf
DBP Monthly ED Report 3-23-DURD.pdf
2023 Downtown_Bozeman_Study-Mendenhall-Babcock.pdf
00:27:16 Ellie Staley presented the March 2023 ED report.
I) 00:56:36 Adjournment
For more information please contact Ellie Staley, Downtown Bozeman Partnership,
ellie@downtownbozeman.org. This board generally meets the 3rd Tuesday of the month from 12:00 to
1:30pm
5
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Downtown Area Urban Renewal District Board
FROM:Ellie Staley, Executive Director Downtown Bozeman Partnership
SUBJECT:Downtown URD FY24 Work Plan & Budget Approval
MEETING DATE:April 18, 2023
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Plan/Report/Study
RECOMMENDATION:Approve
STRATEGIC PLAN:7.3 Best Practices, Creativity & Foresight: Utilize best practices, innovative
approaches, and constantly anticipate new directions and changes relevant
to the governance of the City. Be also adaptable and flexible with an
outward focus on the customer and an external understanding of the issues
as others may see them.
BACKGROUND:The Downtown URD board will discuss and review fiscal year 2024 for final
board approval before City Commission approval set for May 16.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None.
ALTERNATIVES:None.
FISCAL EFFECTS:None.
Attachments:
DTN URD Budget FY2024 DRAFT-3.pdf
FY2024 URD Work Plan-Budget_DRAFT.pdf
Report compiled on: April 12, 2023
6
Downtown Urban Renewal District Board - FY24 DRAFT
Category
FY23 Year-
End Proj.
FY23 FINAL
Budget
FY24 DRAFT
Budget
Income
Starting Cash Balance $6,703,600 $4,263,900 $7,860,300
Income from TIF $335,000
COB Interlocal Share $1,543,000 $1,504,100 $1,558,200
Entitlement Share State of Montana $57,100 $5,900 $57,100
Interest Income $1,900 $2,100
Other Income
Total Income $8,305,600 $6,108,900 $9,477,700
Expenses
Operations
DBP Management Fee $203,500 $203,500 $220,000
City Administrative Costs/Support $56,100 $35,000 $58,100
Total Operations $203,500 $203,500 $278,100
Infrastructure Improvements
Street Furniture/Streetscape Improvements & Furniture $75,000 $25,000 $50,000
Park Improvements (Soroptimist/NBPP)$26,600 $25,000 $25,000
Alley Improvements $200,000 $200,000 $250,000
Intersection Cable Anchor Repairs $25,000 $25,000
Parklet Infrastructure $0 $20,000
Streetscape Assistance Grant Program $18,400 $50,000 $50,000
Life-Safety Grant Program $30,000 $30,000
Fiber-Broadband Infrastructure Grants $3,700 $10,000 $10,000
Wayfinding & Parking Signage $15,000 $15,000
Bozeman Creek Improvements $10,000 $0
Alternative Transportation Projects $50,000 $50,000
Streetlamp Power Reconfiguration Project (SILD)$100,000
Workforce Housing Project - Fire Station One $1,600,000 $1,600,000
Total Improvements $323,700 $2,040,000 $2,225,000
Planning
Alley Planning $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Parklet Planning/Program $7,700 $50,000 $20,000
Technical Assistance Grant Program $50,000 $50,000
Residential Incentive Grant Program $200,000 $200,000
Utility Infrastructure Improvements $100,000 $50,000
Wayfinding Plan Development $25,000 $25,000
Downtown Infrastructure & Public Realm Plan $50,000 $50,000
Side-Streetscape Preliminary Engineering $50,000 $100,000
Downtown Streetscape Design Standards $25,000 $0
North Willson Streetscape Project $75,000 $0
Transportation Planning $31,200 $50,000 $50,000
Parking Management Planning & Infrastructure Support $20,000 $20,000
Bozeman Creek Planning $10,000 $20,000
Soroptimist Park Planning $25,000 $0
Code Amendments $20,000 $0
DBIP General Implementation $30,300 $50,000 $50,000
Structured Parking Informal, Site Plan, Bids $1,250,000 $1,750,000
Professional Services Term Contract (parking site analysis)$12,000 $75,000 $75,000
Parking Supply - Designated Funds $4,000,000
Total Planning $131,200 $2,075,000 $6,440,000
Parking Structure
Garage Bond Payment $335,000 $335,000 $335,000
Total Parking Garage Payments $335,000 $335,000 $335,000
Total Expenses $993,400 $4,653,500 $9,278,100
Balance $7,312,200 $1,455,400 $199,600
DURD FY24 DRAFT Budget 7
Downtown Urban Renewal District
FY2024 Work Plan and Budget - Review
Downtown URD Mission Statement:
The Downtown Bozeman Urban Renewal District board (URD) will foster an economically thriving district that:
1) attracts investment; 2) stabilizes and strengthens the tax base; and 3) supports the vitality and diversity of
the Gallatin Valley as its social and cultural center.
Ongoing DBP/City of Bozeman Operational Support:
Downtown Bozeman Partnership Management Fee (FY23 - $203,500, FY24 - $220,000)
An estimated 8% increase in FY24. The DBP has seen significant rises is health care premiums, lease
rates, energy bills and overall operational costs and this is a needed increase to cover overall rise in
operational costs to the organization and for employee retention.
City Economic Development Specialist (FY23 - $56,100, FY24 - $58,100)
This expense helps fund a portion of payroll expenses for City of Bozeman staffing support. This has
looked different over the past two years as digital platforms have been enhanced and the need for
support have shifted. We confirmed that due to the rise in wages and benefits that this expense was
much higher in FY23 than originally anticipated. A small increase is projected for FY24 with similar city
staff support.
Encumbered/On-Going Projects and Programs:
Street Furniture/Streetscape-new purchases (FY23 - $25,000 (FY24 - $50,000)
In FY23 we shifted to tree and tree grate updates based on need. We hired Greenspace to pull, grind
and replant 5 of 11 trees that died during the drought in 2021/22. We also purchased several new
benches and tree guards/grates for redeveloped sites. In FY24 we will continue to support the City of
Bozeman for tree replacement projects that require added engineering or contract work. We will need
also to purchase several new tree guards and grates for the remaining 8 trees (2 more removed in
FY22).
Soroptimist Park/North Black Pocket Park (FY23/Improvements $25,000, FY24/Maintenance –
$25,000)
In FY23 this was intended for future Soroptimist Park planning but was used to complete the North
Black Pocket Park by board decision. Moving forward, I’d propose we combine the ongoing
improvement needs for Soroptimist Park and our now-needed ongoing improvements at the North
Black Pocket Park and seasonal planters. No future large enhancements are planned for Soroptimist
Park, after a minor revamp in 2022 but could be a priority in the future.
Alley Improvement Project & Planning (FY23 - $250,000, FY24 – $300,000)
We are underway with the North Black to Tracy Alley Improvement Project and have completed initial
design plans, hired a design team and project manager. We are finalizing a CCOA with the city and
making plans for an alley-wide trash program and several call for art announcements. Majority of work
8
is planned for spring 2023, based on project bid interest. The increase in FY24 is to cover the increased
construction costs due to inflation and to allow for additional funding for the next alley design plans.
Intersection Cable Anchor Repairs (FY23/24 - $25,000)
This is a just-in-case fund, and no large repairs are projected for FY24. These are ongoing and necessary
upgrades, specifically as buildings get redeveloped on those specific corners.
Pedlet/Parklet Project (FY23/Planning - $50,000, FY24/Planning & Infrastructure - $40,000)
The idea of a “parklet” or extension of private use into public sidewalk space has been in discussion for
many years and elevated during covid. We have recently completed a plan that led us into a “Pedlet”
idea rather than a “Parklet” with Downtown Partnership ownership. Most recently the city staff
showed concern with implementing this project due to loss of parking and the next steps for support
will be to take the plan to the transportation board.
Workforce Housing Project – Fire Station One (FY23/24 - Encumbered $1,600,000)
This is an encumbered expense approved for a project with 50 units of work force housing to be sold at
120% AMI. The $1.6 million approved for this project will be reimbursed at the certificate of occupancy
and when all of the project conditions have been met. This will likely be reimbursed after FY24 but will
be encumbered until paid or approved project changes.
On-going Programs & Projects to Revise/Prioritize in FY24:
URD Grant Programs – The URD grants have been updated to reflect current code updates and can
now be completed online. Although, a substantial audit needs to be made to these to make sure they
are still relevant to the needs of downtown developments and infrastructure improvement needs. A
complete audit is scheduled to start in early spring 2023 and completed by fall 2023.
Please review and discuss ideas:
• Streetscape Assistance (FY23 - $50,000, FY24 - $50,000)
▪ Make benefits clearer and adjust to current needs including running conduit, improving
water and sewer lines
▪ Add and an Infrastructure Improvement Grants, possibly based on tax projections over
lifetime of DURD, research loan program with City Economic Department
• Fiber Infrastructure Grant (FY23 - $10,000, FY24 - $10,000)
▪ No big changes needed, continue to be used and generally see up to 5 applicants/yr.
• Life-safety Grant (FY23 - $10,000, FY24 - $10,000)
▪ Great investment but only for larger re-development projects, assume 1 per/yr. at
$10K/ea.
• Technical Assistance Grant (FY23 - $50,000, FY24 - $50,000)
▪ Add Art/Social Infrastructure Grant
▪ Add CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) Grants – lighting,
cameras, landscape improvements
• Residential Incentive Program (FY2023 - $200,000, FY24 - $200,000)
▪ TWO potential projects seeking support in FY24, 5th and Mendenhall 6-story residential
project, The Scully building converting commercial into residential. Both in planning
stages and hope to complete work in FY24.
Wayfinding and Parking Signage Project – Planning/Infrastructure (FY23 - $40,000, FY24 - $40,000)
9
This ranked as a top project on the URD board prioritization exercise to expand and clarify what
amenities and parking are available. This was not completed in FY23 due to the unclear future of paid
parking in downtown. The cost will be an estimated $20,000 for fabrication and installation of signage,
$15,000 for design and planning for the project. Great Falls received a state grant for a downtown
wayfinding plan. I hope to look into this for late FY24.
Downtown Infrastructure & Public Realm Plan (FY23 - $50,000, FY24 $50,000)
To develop plan to enhance Downtown’s identity and ensure public realm developments create a
consistent and sustainable environment, establish framework for near term infrastructure investments
that incrementally build to long term vision, provide path for private investment, while leveraging
limited resources. We were unable to begin this project in FY23 but intend to start Phase 1 of this plan
in FY24. The scope is currently being reviewed.
• Side-Streetscape Side-Street Preliminary Engineering (FY23 - $50,000, FY24 - $100,000, combine with
below) - To update and continue planning to extend the streetscape to side streets, Babcock, and
Mendenhall. This could also assist in the development of the design guidelines and standards project
for future downtown development assistance that will include streetscape updates.
o Design Guidelines/Standards (FY23 - $25,000, FY24 - $0)
It has been increasingly apparent as larger development projects expand throughout our
district, that we need to develop a set of downtown design guidelines, to create and support
consistent streetscape enhancement and provide developers with the information they need to
properly expand the efforts we have made to beautify and improve our district. We hope to
begin this planning process in FY24 and combine into a larger efforts that includes side street
engineering and future downtown maintenance needs.
o North Willson Streetscape Project - Planning (FY23 - $75,000, FY24 - $0)
This project is intended to complete the needed streetscape along the North Willson parking lot
once Armory project was completed. This project was put on hold due to covid and lack of
resources. The idea is to put together an RFP for the engineering and reinstallation plans
historic lamps. with other property owners to complete the remaining areas in collaboration.
Discuss priority in FY24. Additional thoughts would be to add this to the Side-Streetscape
Engineering Project and move forward with additional construction plans in the future, possibly
in conjunction with additional side street completion.
Transportation (FY23/Planning - $50,000, FY24/Improvements - $50,000)
We have recently completed phase 2 of a downtown transportation plan with Sanderson Stewart that
includes short-term infrastructure improvements with a focus on pedestrian safety and downtown
access along Mendenhall and Babcock. We are currently developing a scope with short and long-term
attainable solutions with them and City Public Works and Engineering. We hope to utilize this plan for
some of the suggested safety improvements in FY24.
Alternative Transportation Projects (FY23/24 - $50,000)
This has been established as an ongoing DURD priority. No projects were completed in FY23 but there
are discussions with the City Public Works department to provide DURD support for the current Black
Avenue Bike Route project. These funds could support the portion of the project within DURD
boundaries.
Employee Paid Parking Permit System (FY23 - $20,000), Revise for FY24 to a Shared-Use/Parking
Outreach program (FY24 - $20,000)
10
Employee support, outreach and education around parking and parking management continues to be a
priority as our parking needs change. These allocated funds could be used to help advertise any
changes to the employee parking system, potentially off-set costs to employees for permitting or for
other general implementation costs with a focus on assisting the businesses with any changes or
concerns.
Bozeman Creek (FY23/Improvements - $20,000, FY24/Planning - $20,000)
Educational and artistic project completed in FY23. Continue engineering work in FY24 to look at flood
plan mitigation within downtown. A group has been meeting to discuss next steps and current
documents have been provided to city leadership.
Structured Parking Site Plan, Bids - Planning (FY23 - $1,250,000 FY24 - $1,750,000, 000)
Encumbered funds to support future parking supply infrastructure, increase budgeted amount in FY24
due to inflation.
Parking Supply – Allocated funds for future project (FY23 - $0, FY24 $4,000,000)
Although “parking supply and infrastructure” has been a DURD priority for many years, established in
both downtown plans and outlined in Resolution 1409. Although funds for the construction and
development for this project have not been formally allocated based on bonding capacity. Discuss how
to allocate these funds or establish documentation for future allocation of funds once a bond capacity
study has been completed.
Prioritize for future, Unencumbered:
Code Amendments (FY23 - $20,000, FY24 - $0)
This project would include planning to include more code flexibility Downtown for existing and new
buildings (departures, deviations, relaxations, etc.). As the Unified Development Code is slated to do a
full amendment process, it may be important for us to have some funding for specific downtown
planning to assistance through the city process. We will know more about this after the City
Commission work session on Feb. 28 and we may know then if there are any issues with non-DPIP
concepts.
11
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Downtown Area Urban Renewal District Board
FROM:Ellie Staley, Executives Director Downtown Bozeman Partnership
SUBJECT:Executive Director's April 2023 Report.
MEETING DATE:April 18, 2023
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Plan/Report/Study
RECOMMENDATION:Discuss
STRATEGIC PLAN:7.3 Best Practices, Creativity & Foresight: Utilize best practices, innovative
approaches, and constantly anticipate new directions and changes relevant
to the governance of the City. Be also adaptable and flexible with an
outward focus on the customer and an external understanding of the issues
as others may see them.
BACKGROUND:Ellie will present the monthly report of general program updates and
updates to topic relating to downtown. Board will discuss relevant matters.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None
ALTERNATIVES:None
FISCAL EFFECTS:None.
Attachments:
Alley design_draft.pdf
Downtown Parklet Assessment Report FINAL 020823.pdf
N BLACK POCKET PARK CONCEPTS_081822.pdf
2023 Downtown_Bozeman_Study-Mendenhall-Babcock.pdf
DBP Monthly ED Report 5-23-URD.pdf
Report compiled on: April 12, 2023
12
N. TRACY AVE.N. BLACK AVE.13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Downtown Bozeman
Parklet & Pedlet Program
Assessment Report
Prepared for:
Downtown Bozeman Partnership
Prepared by:
Sanderson Stewart
20
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
2
Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3
Parklets & Pedlets ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Program Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Background ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Typologies ........................................................................................................................................ 6
Parklets........................................................................................................................................................ 6
Pedlets…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8
Ownership & Management Options .................................................................................................. 9
Ownership ................................................................................................................................................... 9
Management & Maintenance ................................................................................................................... 10
Cost Recovery Options .............................................................................................................................. 11
Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 12
Regulatory Considerations & Constraints ........................................................................................ 13
State Regulations ...................................................................................................................................... 13
Local Regulations ...................................................................................................................................... 14
Recommendations & Next Steps ..................................................................................................... 16
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 16
Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................. 20
Resources ....................................................................................................................................... 21
Peer Downtown Programs ........................................................................................................................ 21
National Resources ................................................................................................................................... 21
21
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
3
Introduction
Parklets & Pedlets
Parklets and pedlets are examples of tactical urbanism meant to repurpose public spaces that urban
sociologist William H. Whyte called “the huge reservoir of space yet untapped by imagination”.
It is important to ensure equal access—both real and perceived—to public parklets and pedlets. They
must be designed and implemented to be welcoming and inclusive. Gordon Douglas reminds us in his
book The Help-Yourself City: Legitimacy & Inequality in DIY Urbanism that when repurposing public
spaces, we must maintain “a critical eye on the social qualities of the spaces we are building, on who
benefits and who is excluded”.
Program Purpose
What is the intended purpose of a downtown parklet program? To provide inclusive public places
where residents, employees, and visitors can ‘eddy out’, meet, sit, and relax? To provide exclusive
seating areas to support private businesses? Both?
The purpose of establishing a formal parklet and pedlet program for Downtown Bozeman is to realize
the corresponding benefits that have been proven in communities around the world. As articulated by
the City of Vancouver in British Columbia, parklets and pedlets:
• Expand Public Space – provide places for people to sit, relax, and enjoy the city
• Foster Social Life – create welcoming, year-round public spaces through partnerships
• Support Local Business – attract people to the location with unique seating and a variety of
community activities
• Widen Sidewalks – increase space for people to walk where sidewalks are narrow or congested
• Build Sustainably – source low impact, reusable materials with planted features
22
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
4
Background
A parklet is a small public park space or private seating area installed as an extension of the sidewalk in
the parking lane of a street. Parklets are typically 6-8 feet wide and vary in length between 15 and 40
feet. Best practices dictate the design of parklets to ensure accessibility and safety.
A pedlet is an extension of the sidewalk in the parking lane of a street that is used as the pedestrian
throughway. By diverting pedestrians on to a pedlet, the traditional sidewalk can be used for private
seating. Pedlets are typically 6-8 feet wide and vary in length between 15 and 40 feet. Best practices
dictate the design of parklets to ensure accessibility and safety.
National History
In 2005, a group of artists quietly established
Park(ing) Day by installing a simple parklet in a single
on-street parking space in San Francisco. The 12-hour
tactical urbanism experiment grew into a common,
and often permanent, strategy for repurposing
mundane public parking spaces into vibrant places
for people.
Louisville, Colorado began a downtown ‘patio’
initiative in 2009 which may well of been the first
parklet program in the country.
Did This Quiet Colorado Town Invent Parklets? |
Modern Cities
Over the past two decades, the uses of parklets have
evolved to include a variety of types and
applications. The COVID pandemic (2020-2021)
accelerated the use of parklets as communities
proactively sought to provide more opportunities for
citizens to safely repopulate downtowns and
patronize businesses. Many parklets are still
designed and constructed locally, staying true to the
‘lighter, faster, cheaper’ tenets of tactical urbanism, but numerous companies have emerged that sell
professionally manufactured parklets.
Montana History
Communities across Montana have been utilizing parklets and pedlets since 2014. As highlighted
below, several Montana downtown organizations have established formal parklet and pedlet
programs.
Billings
2016—Doc Harper’s Tavern installed a “seasonal pedestrian friendly sidewalk extension” in the parking
lane on North Broadway. Doc Harper’s subsequently added a fenced seating area on the sidewalk for
their customers. Includes sale and consumption of alcohol.
23
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
5
2020—Downtown Billings Alliance established a formal Parklet Program
2021—The Sassy Biscuit Company installed a parklet in a single parallel parking space on North 29th
Street. The parklet is used as outdoor seating for Sassy Biscuit customers. Does not include alcohol
sales or consumption.
Great Falls
2017—The Downtown Great Falls BID established a formal pedlet program and Mighty Mo Brewing
Company installed Great Falls’ first pedlet
2018—The Celtic Cowboy, Burger Bunker, and Enbar began installing seasonal pedlets
Helena
2021—Downtown Helena established a formal parklet program
2022—Blackfoot Brewing Company installed the first parklet in downtown Helena on Park Avenue
Lewistown
2017—The Montana Main Street Program gave the City of Lewistown a grant to install the town’s first
seasonal parklet
Missoula
2014—Downtown businesses began participating in National Park(ing) Day by installing temporary
parklets in on-street parking spaces
2018—Missoula in Motion with the support of the Missoula Parking Commission established a “First
Friday” parklet program to provide inclusive public spaces
2022—Six First Friday Parklet events were held downtown from May through September
Bozeman History
To date, Bozeman has only experimented with parklets on a very limited basis. In 2018, the Downtown
Bozeman Partnership installed a seasonal public parklet on South Black Ave (pictured below). Wild
Joe’s Coffee participated in National Park(ing) Day with a pop-up parklet on Main Street that same year
(pictured on the previous page).
24
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
6
Typologies
There are tremendous resources available regarding every aspect of parklets, from community benefits
to design specifications. There is less information related to pedlets, however, they are fundamentally
parklets without seating.
Parklets
In terms of purpose and programming, there are three basic types of parklets that function in distinctly
different ways. Where each type is used depends on the intent of the managing entity and local
regulations that may be restrictive of certain types.
Public Shared Open Spaces
Description
The original parklet installations were to provide democratic public open space for users of all types to
freely enjoy. Public parklets serve as an inclusive extension of the sidewalk and function like other
open spaces with common placemaking amenities like seating, tables, and planter boxes. Some public
parklets creatively integrate other uses like bike parking.
“Robin Abad-Ocubillo, the director of Shared Spaces at San Francisco Planning, ran the
parklet program for 10 years after his tenure at the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy.
Working in parks gave him an appreciation of their democratic influence. “Our shared open
spaces are the venue and the vehicle for connecting us as individuals across class, race, and
other demographic divisions. They cultivate civic engagement and our sense of stewardship,”
he said.” Source: One Parking Spot to 100 Public Parks
Advantages
• Inclusive and open to the public
• Allow for creative design including district branding and public art
• Create community partnership opportunities
• Low regulatory barriers
• Minimum administrative management
Disadvantages
• Require public funding for procurement or construction
• Require public maintenance for cleaning and repairs
• Places users immediately adjacent to vehicle lane potentially eroding the experience
25
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
7
Public Parklet Examples
Exclusive Cafe Seating (No Alcohol)
Description
Many parklets are used as outdoor seating for private businesses to serve food and non-alcoholic
beverages. In some cases, cafe parklets are an extension of a restaurant’s sidewalk seating, in others,
parklets are their only outdoor service space. Common elements include tables, chairs, umbrellas,
planters, gas heaters, and sometimes canvas or vinyl sidewalls.
Advantages
• Privately owned since use is for-profit by the associated business
• Privately managed and cleaned
Disadvantages
• For the exclusive use of paying customers of a single business (not inclusive)
• Involve additional regulatory administration
• Places users immediately adjacent to vehicle lane potentially eroding the experience
Private Parklet Examples
26
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
8
Exclusive Cafe Seating (With Alcohol)
Description
These parklets provide additional outdoor customer seating for restaurants that serve alcohol with or
without food. The parklet may be in addition to or in lieu of sidewalk seating for a specific business.
Common elements include tables, chairs, umbrellas, planters, gas heaters, and fabric sidewalls.
Advantages
• Privately owned since use is for-profit by the associated business
• Privately managed and cleaned
Disadvantages
• For the exclusive use of paying customers of a single business
• Heavily regulated with very specific administrative requirements to serve alcohol
• Places users immediately adjacent to vehicle lane potentially eroding the experience
Pedlets
There is essentially only one type of pedlet, as a pedlet is an installation that simply reroutes the
pedestrian throughway from the sidewalk out into the parking lane and then back to the sidewalk.
Description
Pedlets have many of the same features as parklets including flush transitions to and from the street
curb, elevated decking, perimeter safety railings, and MUTCD safety indicators. Pedlets have the same
general physical dimensions as a parklet to safely be located within the street parking lane.
Advantages
• Simpler and more economical to construct due to no seating, shade, or planter components
• Potentially safer considering users only occupy the installation for a very short duration
• Easier to maintain due to lack of cafe food and beverage ‘mess’
Disadvantages
• None
Pedlet Examples
27
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
9
Ownership & Management Options
There are a variety of ownership and management options of parklet programs commonly used in peer
communities that would be viable options for Downtown Bozeman. In large part, choosing the most
appropriate options for ownership and management will depend on whether parklets or pedlets will
be for exclusive or inclusive use.
Ownership
Public Ownership
Description
Public ownership means the City, Downtown Bozeman Partnership (DBP), or any of the DBP member
organizations (BID, DBA, URD) would procure and own the physical elements of parklets and/or
pedlets. The advantages and disadvantages listed below are from the perspective of the DBP.
Advantages
• Control the number, quality, and design specifications of parklets and pedlets
• Control the timing and quality of seasonal installation and removal
• Control compliance with codes and regulations
• No need for formal program (application, review, approval, enforcement)
Disadvantages
• Incur the costs of procurement
• Assume management and maintenance responsibilities
• Need offseason storage capacity
The blue downtown bike stall program is a good example of how public ownership of parklets and/or
pedlets would function.
Private Ownership
Description
Private ownership means businesses or other organizations would procure and own the physical
elements of parklets and/or pedlets. The advantages and disadvantages listed below are from the
perspective of the DBP.
Advantages
• No procurement costs
• No maintenance responsibilities
• No needed storage capacity
Disadvantages
• Need to establish a formal program to administer and manage
28
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
10
Source: NATCO Parklet Guide
Management & Maintenance
Parklets and pedlets can require varying amounts of overall management and maintenance depending
on how a program is structured. As outlined above, maintenance is directly correlated to ownership.
But management will likely fall upon the Downtown Partnership regardless of ownership.
Management
Unless parklets and pedlets are owned and managed by the Downtown Partnership, a comprehensive
management program will need to be established covering all the associated needs including but not
necessarily limited to the following:
• Administer an annual application, review, and approval process
• Determine, review, and revise fee structure
• Prescribe specific design criteria
• Establish strict installation requirements
• Outline maintenance expectations
• Monitor and enforce design, installation, and maintenance
• Liaison with the City of Bozeman
• Assist permit holders with issues related to safety, vandalism, and public relations
• Allocate funding for business support grants (optional)
Establishing a thorough but not overly burdensome management program will be essential to facilitate
successful deployment while ensuring feasibility, safety, and aesthetics.
29
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
11
Maintenance
Parklets would require more maintenance than pedlets as parklets typically involve more amenities
like seating, planters, and shade elements. Common maintenance needs to both parklets and pedlets
include, but are not limited to, these tasks:
• trash pick up
• surface cleaning
• graffiti remediation
• damage repair
The Downtown Partnership has established a very high-level of public realm management and
maintenance that will need to be applied to any parklet and pedlet program.
Source: Montana Main Street Program—Lewistown Parklet 2017
Cost Recovery
There are a variety of options to generate revenue from the parklets and pedlets for private use, but
not all these options would necessarily generate revenue for the Downtown Partnership. To keep the
costs affordable for interested businesses, the administration and maintenance fees should be
minimized to the greatest extent possible. As such, any revenues collected by the Downtown
Partnership would not necessarily cover the related expenses.
City Encroachment Fees
A parklet or pedlet installation could be charged City of Bozeman encroachment fees like those
assessed for construction dumpsters.
30
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
12
City Parking Fees
A parklet or pedlet installation could be charged City of Bozeman parking fees like those assessed for
construction vehicle parking or based on the potential revenue from paid on street parking, should
such a system be adopted.
Program Administration Fees
The Downtown Partnership could charge private parklet and pedlet applicants a fee to help cover the
administration of the formal program (application, review, approval, inspection, enforcement).
URD Infrastructure Funds
The Downtown Urban Renewal District (URD) could allocate funds to procure public parklets or pedlets
as an investment to improve the public realm not unlike it does for benches, the blue bike stalls, or
Soroptomist Park. If the parklets and pedlets are going to be privately owned, the URD could establish
a cost-share grant program.
BID Maintenance Fees
There could be a BID fee charged to each approved parklet/pedlet applicant to cover the additional
maintenance demands of the associated outdoor seating. This would be like the BID fees paid by food
trucks that are permitted to operate downtown.
Any City of Bozeman parking or encroachment fees could be partially or in-full donated to the
Downtown Partnership as a program cost recovery strategy.
Downtown Billings Parklet Program:
Parklets may be assembled and displayed between May 1st and October 31st. They
must be removed and stored away during the rest of the year. If encroaching over
parking spaces, parklets may only encroach over a maximum of three diagonal parking
spaces (36 feet) or a maximum of two parallel parking spaces (50 feet). A flat rate of
$2,500.00 is to be paid to the City’s Parking Division. This fee covers the entire duration
(May - Oct) per year.
Location
There two general location options for parklets and pedlets in downtown Bozeman: along the east-
west streets of Main, Babcock, and Mendenhall or along the north-south avenues of Grand, Willson,
Tracy, Black, Bozeman, Rouse, Church, and Wallace. Factors to be considered regarding location are
traffic volumes, traffic speeds, regulatory jurisdiction, user experience, and overall need.
Main Street
While MDT does have a parklet policy for their highway system routes, Main Street is not an ideal
location for parklets for several reasons. First, the parklet aesthetic, experience, and safety on Main
Street would be compromised by the high volumes of traffic, average speed of traffic, and the
31
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
13
presence of semi-trucks. Second, Main Street provides downtown’s most valuable parking. As the 2019
Downtown Plan emphasizes, Main Street cannot do it all for downtown—amenities and services need
to continue to extend north and south.
The same challenges and disadvantages that exist along Main Street also apply to Mendenhall and
Babcock Streets, which are also high traffic volume and speed corridors.
Side Streets
Downtown’s side streets would provide a much better parklet or pedlet user experience with less and
slower traffic. The sidewalks along these streets are narrower, thus providing less space for public or
private seating. While the parking is still highly utilized on side streets, it is secondary to that on Main
Street. Parklets on the side streets, whether public or private, will help draw pedestrian activity north
and south to better support off-Main businesses. South Willson as multiple food and beverage
business making it an obvious location for this program. All the side streets downtown are within the
City of Bozeman’s jurisdiction except for Rouse Avenue north of Main Street which is MDT’s Hwy 86.
The following street classifications, and the corresponding traffic volumes, need to be considered when
determining parklet and pedlet locations.
LOCAL STREETS: Grand, Willson, Tracy, Black, Bozeman, Rouse (south of Babcock),
Church (north of Main), and Wallace
COLLECTOR STREETS: Church (between Main and Babcock)
ARTERIAL STREETS: Willson (south of Main) and Rouse (north of Babcock)
Regulatory Considerations
A variety of state and local regulations and permit requirements are relevant to establishing and
managing a parklet and pedlet program in downtown Bozeman.
State Regulations
Several State of Montana regulations and programs are applicable to the installation of parklets and/or
pedlets. Below is a summary of relevant oversight from the Montana Department of Transportation
(MDT) and the Montana Department of Revenue (DOR).
Montana Department of Transportation
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) has a parklet and pedlet occupancy and
maintenance agreement. The agreement allows for the seasonal installation of parklets and pedlets
within the state highway right-of-way and along urban routes maintained by MDT. This agreement is
between MDT and the City and is administered by the MDT District Administrator or Maintenance
Chief.
The agreement stipulates location and design requirements, obligations of the City, obligations of
MDT, general terms and conditions, and a $350 annual fee per installation.
While it is encouraging that MDT permits parklets and pedlets, this program has some inherent
challenges that would make management at the local level more complicated. Perhaps more
32
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
14
important, state highways and MDT urban routes are not ideal locations for parklets or pedlets in
downtown Bozeman.
Department of Revenue
State law does allow the sale and consumption of alcohol on exterior patios or decks by a licensed
retail establishment. The sidewalk adjacent to a licensed establishment constitutes an ‘on premise’
patio. Several Bozeman bars currently apply this provision in conjunction with the City of Bozeman
sidewalk encroachment and exclusive use permit programs.
MCA 16-3-311. Suitable premises for licensed retail establishments.
(1) (a) A licensed retailer may use a part of a building as premises licensed for on-
premises consumption of alcoholic beverages. The licensed retailer must demonstrate
that it has adequate control over all alcoholic beverages to prevent self-service, service
to underage persons, and service to persons who are actually or apparently
intoxicated.
(4) The premises may include one or more exterior patios or decks as long as sufficient
physical safeguards are in place to ensure proper service and consumption of alcoholic
beverages.
State liquor regulations potentially prohibit the sale and service of alcohol in typical on-street parklet
seating areas. This possibility is due to the ambiguity of the provision that the “retailer must
demonstrate that it has adequate control of all alcoholic beverages [and] sufficient physical safeguards
are in place to ensure proper service and consumption”.
Additional research and perhaps legal counsel will be required to definitively determine the legality of
selling and serving alcohol in parklets that are not directly adjacent to the primary premise.
Application and enforcement of any regulation is subject to interpretation which can change as state
regulators change. It should not be assumed that the local status quo will perpetuate.
Local Regulations
The City of Bozeman has numerous regulations and programs that could apply to or serve as elements
of a downtown parklet and pedlet management program. Below are summaries of existing permits and
programs from the City Parking Division and Engineering Department.
Bozeman Parking
The City Parking Division administers a Temporary On-Street Parking Permit program that allows use of
the parking lane in downtown without being subject to the two-hour restriction. The program
specifically identifies parklets as one of the qualifying uses.
Applying this permit program is incongruent to the parklet and pedlet program being proposed due to
several overly restrictive provisions including:
• Permit cost is $20 per day
• Permit does on allow the user to engage in retail commerce
33
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
15
• Permit is issued for a maximum of 30 days
While parklets are included as a permissible use it was done so when they were being proposed for
short-term special events like National (Park)ing Day.
Source: NATCO Parklet Guide
Bozeman Engineering
The City administers a Downtown Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Program which allows businesses to
place a variety of items in the sidewalk frontage zones including tables and chairs. A Sidewalk
Encroachment Permit requires a $50 application fee. If cafe seating is to include the purchase and
consumption of alcohol, then a Downtown Right of Way Exclusive Use Permit is required. This Exclusive
Use Permit requires paying an annual fee calculated on the size of the enclosed sidewalk cafe relative
to the taxable value of the associated property.
Both permits require the applicant to provide important information and meet critical criteria.
• Site plan showing the encroachment location including the size and dimensions of the
encroachment and showing other existing adjacent obstructions or improvements (trash cans,
light fixtures, street signs, sculptures, bike racks, trees, etc.)
• Copy of a current City of Bozeman business license
• Certificate of liability insurance with coverage of $1 million per occurrence with a $2 million
general aggregate (or $1.5 million per occurrence and a minimum coverage of $750,000 for
each claim)
• Copy of Food Purveyor’s License or approval statement issued by Gallatin City-County Health
Department, if selling food and/or beverages.
• Copy of the state approved alcohol beverage license, if operating an outdoor cafe serving
alcoholic beverages
Sidewalk Encroachment Permit | City Of Bozeman
The Downtown Partnership receives a ‘blanket’ Sidewalk Encroachment Permit covering the benches,
flower baskets, bike racks, and trash/recycling receptacles.
34
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
16
Any future parklet and pedlet program would require the associated business to comply with the BMC,
Chapter 34, Article 5.
ARTICLE 5. - DOWNTOWN SIDEWALK ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PROGRAM
Sec. 34.05.010. - Purpose and intent.
A. It is the intent of the city commission, in enacting the ordinance from which this
article is derived, to:
1. Serve and protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public;
2. Regulate and control private uses and encroachments occurring upon public
rights of way in the downtown business district of the city by establishing distinct
criteria to permit and/or approve non-substantial encroachments, substantial
encroachments, and exclusive uses;
3. Develop a fair and equitable program that will enhance the overall appearance,
ambiance and environment of the downtown business district; and
4. Ensure accessibility for all users as established under the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
The other existing City permit that could be relevant to a future parklet and pedlet program is the
Commercial Encroachment Permit. This is the permit utilized for relocating the pedestrian throughway
into the parking lane when the sidewalk needs to be available for building construction projects. This
could be an applicable City permit to use for pedlet and parklet installations.
Important stipulations that would be appropriate to apply to parklets and pedlets include:
• Maintaining proper stormwater drainage
• Cleaning up trash and debris
• City inspection provision
• Waiver of liability for any damage to the installation
• Reimbursement for any roadway damage resulting from the installation
Commercial Encroachment Permit Application | City Of Bozeman
Recommendations & Next Steps
The recommendations and next steps presented below are based on the typologies, ownership and
management options, and applicable regulations discussed above. The existing built environment and
the current nature of the public realm also influenced the recommendations.
Recommendations—Option 1
Pedlets
Pedlets should be used to reroute the pedestrian throughway, thus creating room on the sidewalk for
an exclusive cafe seating area adjacent to a food and beverage service business located on downtown’s
side streets.
Pedlets are simpler and less cost prohibitive to procure, construct, install, and maintain. They also
minimize the time that users are directly exposed to the adjacent vehicle lane.
With pedlets, private cafe seating can be immediately adjacent to the food and beverage business. This
allows patrons to be served without interfering with the pedestrian throughway. Sitting and being
35
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
17
served next to business provides a much more pleasant user experience than a parklet next to moving
vehicles.
Ownership
Pedlets that allow for private businesses to create exclusive cafe seating should be owned by the
associated business.
Costs
The costs of procurement, construction, installation, removal, and storage for pedlets that allow for
private businesses to create exclusive cafe seating should be incurred by the associated business.
To incentivize the use of pedlets to create more outdoor dining opportunities, the DBP should consider
a grant program to provide initial one-time funding to help defray the costs of procurement and
construction.
If private entities are required to incur the design, fabrication, and procurement costs then they should
be entitled to install the facility annually rather than be subject to a lottery system.
Source: GF BID Pedlet Program—Mighty Mo installation design rendering
Management
The DBP should establish a comprehensive parklet management program that governs the following
elements:
• Quantity, location, and dates of parklet installations
• Permit requirements for insurance, licensing, and associated City permits and fees
• Design, installation, and maintenance requirements
There are several established management programs referenced in the Resources section below that
could serve as templates for a DBP program.
Maintenance
The owner of each pedlet should be responsible for the daily, periodic, and long-term maintenance of
the structure.
The DBP should include an additional annual BID maintenance fee for each pedlet to help cover the
additional clean up required of the BID staff due to the cafe seating and service. This BID fee would be
36
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
18
like the one currently paid by food trucks permitted to operate in downtown.
Design Specifications
The DBP pedlet program should include required design specifications to ensure consistent quality of
construction, installation, function, safety, accessibility, and aesthetic.
Program applicants could be given the option to design and fabricate pedlets according to the required
specifications or source them from third-party manufacturers endorsed by the DBP.
Pedlet design specifications should be based on those established by the NATCO Urban Street Design
Guide which is referenced in the Resources section below.
Parklets
Parklets should be used to create inclusive spaces that would function like public pocket parks along
downtown’s side streets. The purpose would be to provide additional places for residents, employees,
and visitors to ‘eddy out’, sit, relax, and socialize. The preferred location for a public parklet would be
on a side street that does not have food and beverage businesses that might otherwise take advantage
of a formal pedlet program to create private outdoor cafe seating.
Ownership & Costs
The DBP should own and cover the costs associated with parklets for inclusive public use as they would
be improvements to the public realm like the existing street furnishings and bike stall programs. These
parklets would constitute as public infrastructure and therefore could be funded by the Urban Renewal
District.
Management & Maintenance
Public parklets owned by the DBP should be managed and maintained by the BID. This too would be
consistent with the other street furnishing programs like the on-street bike stalls.
Design Specifications
Parklet design specifications should be based on those established by the NATCO Urban Street Design
Guide which is referenced in the Resources section below.
Recommendations—Option 2
Pedlets
As established in Option 1, pedlets should be used to reroute the pedestrian throughway, thus creating
room on the sidewalk for an exclusive cafe seating area adjacent to a food and beverage service
business located on downtown’s side streets.
Ownership
Pedlets should be owned by the Downtown Bozeman Partnership.
Costs
The costs of procurement, construction, installation, removal, and storage for pedlets should be
incurred by the DBP.
In turn, the DBP should lease a pedlet to a business in return for establishing sidewalk café seating. The
monthly lease rate should be established to at a minimum cover the annual costs of installation,
37
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
19
removal, and storage. The lease rate could also include dollars beyond the annual cost to recover the
parklet purchase price over a multi-year horizon. The lease rate should be modest the first year a
business participates to keep the ‘barrier to entry’ low. This could be implanted using a sliding lease
rate that would start at the annual cost level and increase each year thereafter to start recovering the
procurement cost.
Management
Since the DBP will own the pedlets, establishing comprehensive parklet management program will not
be necessary. This will save the DBP considerable time and effort in launching the pedlet project and
going forward by eliminating the need to administer design guidelines, enforce installation and
removal, and provide regulatory assistance to participants.
The preferred permitting option is to include as part of the DBP’s annual ‘blanket’ Sidewalk
Encroachment Permit. Otherwise, the Commercial Encroachment Permit would be applicable.
Maintenance
As the owner of the pedlets, the DBP should utilize the BID maintenance staff for the daily, periodic,
and long-term maintenance of the structures. The DBP should transfer part of the lease fees to the BID
to defray the added labor costs.
Design Specifications
The DBP should either procure the pedlets from a third-party manufacturer.
Program applicants could be given the option to design and fabricate pedlets according to the required
specifications or source them from third-party manufacturers endorsed by the DBP.
Pedlet design specifications should be based on those established by the NATCO Urban Street Design
Guide which is referenced in the Resources section below.
Parklets
Parklets should be used to create inclusive spaces that would function like public pocket parks along
downtown’s side streets. The purpose would be to provide additional places for residents, employees,
and visitors to ‘eddy out’, sit, relax, and socialize. The preferred location for a public parklet would be
on a side street that does not have food and beverage businesses that might otherwise take advantage
of a formal pedlet program to create private outdoor cafe seating.
Ownership & Costs
The DBP should own and cover the costs associated with parklets for inclusive public use as they would
be improvements to the public realm like the existing street furnishings and bike stall programs. These
parklets would constitute as public infrastructure and therefore could be funded by the Urban Renewal
District.
Management & Maintenance
Public parklets owned by the DBP should be managed and maintained by the BID. This too would be
consistent with the other street furnishing programs like the on-street bike stalls.
The preferred permitting option is to include as part of the DBP’s annual ‘blanket’ Sidewalk
Encroachment Permit. Otherwise, the Commercial Encroachment Permit would be applicable.
Design Specifications
Parklet design specifications should be based on those established by the NATCO Urban Street Design
Guide which is referenced in the Resources section below.
38
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
20
Next Steps
Next steps have been suggested to provide options for establishing and launching a formal parklet and
pedlet program in downtown Bozeman.
Pedlet Program
Similar programs in peer communities have been launched as a pilot and this is an option for
downtown Bozeman. But a pilot program essentially requires the same amount of work as establishing
all the procedures and requirements of a formal program.
Therefore, if the recommended Option 1 is chosen, the best course of action would be to establish a
comprehensive program as outlined in the Management section but limit the number of approvals the
first season. This will ensure that the first pedlets are properly procured, designed, fabricated,
installed, and used while testing the interest level from downtown businesses.
Establishing this program in conjunction with City Engineering Department and Parking Division will
take some time, but ideally the inaugural season could be launched during the summer of 2023.
If recommended Option 2 is chosen, the DBP could purchase pedlets during the first quarter of 2023
for installation this summer.
Parklet Program
As suggested, the DBP should start an inclusive public parklet program by procuring and installing a
single structure during the summer of 2023.
Source: GroundplaySF…a creative mobile parklet created from standard roll-off dumpster
39
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
21
COOL IDEA!
Ask the City of Bozeman to donate a brand-new roll-off dumpster to be converted into a
Downtown Bozeman mobile parklet (see inspiration photo below). The DBP could work
with a community minded metal fabricator, like Barton Fabrication, to convert the
dumpster into the parklet structure. The DBP could also partner with a vinyl company,
like Wrap Agency, to brand the parklet. Perhaps downtown’s landscaping partner,
Greenspace Landscaping, would contribute the plantings.
Resources
Peer Downtown Programs
Montana Parklet Program Overview
Includes information about Downtown Billing’s parklet program and Great Fall’s recent MDT route
parklet
The New Parklet Program Adds Pedestrian Friendly Spaces to downtown - Downtown Billings Alliance
Billings MT
The New Parklet Program Adds Pedestrian Friendly Spaces to downtown - Downtown Billings Alliance
Microsoft Word - Parklet Program.docx (downtownbillings.com)
Helena MT
Business Opportunities for Property Owners - Downtown Helena
Klamath Falls OR
Seasonal Pedlet Program (klamathfalls.city)
Seasonal-Park-Pedlet-Manual (klamathfalls.city)
Medford OR
Parklets — Downtown Medford Association
parklet-design-standards.pdf (medfordoregon.gov)
Kingman AZ
Kingman Main Street | Parklet & Pedlet Program
Parklet/pedlet program (choosekingman.com)
National Resources
Project for Public Spaces
A wealth of parklet information
Search results (pps.org)
Examples of Exclusive Commercial Parklets
Gazelles & the Art of Placemaking (pps.org)
40
Downtown Bozeman Parklet & Pedlet Program Assessment
22
A Toolkit for Creating and Implementing Parklets
A comprehensive guide to establishing a parklet program created by the UCLA Luskin School of Public
Affairs Complete Streets Initiative
Reclaiming_the_Right_of_Way.pdf (ucla.edu)
San Francisco Shared Spaces Program Manual
Pages 13-33 provide detailed specifications about placement, dimensions, construction, safety, and
accessibility requirements.
Shared Spaces Manual - November 2021.pdf (sf.gov)
Groundplay
An incredible resource of ideas to transform public spaces into community places with creative
temporary installations of all types.
Published Resources – Groundplay (groundplaysf.org)
Parklets Create Potential for Improved Social Interaction
A parklet can serve as a ‘mobility nook’ (or placemaking nook/eddy/refugia) by converting a traditional
on-street parking space into place that fosters social interaction.
Happy Cities | Learning from community housing movements: Unlocking the social potential of parking
spaces
Parklets Increase People’s Happiness
Trading parking spots for patios might seem like a small step to reclaim street space, but it can have a
remarkable impact on happiness. During the pandemic, we studied the wellbeing effects of temporary
patios at Vancouver breweries.
https://happycities.com/projects/vancouver-breweries-wellbeing-patio-study
NATCO Parklet Guide
National Association of City Transportation Officials recommendations for best practices.
Parklets | National Association of City Transportation Officials (nacto.org)
Main Street America/AARP
Overview of factors to consider to deploy high-impact parklets
AARP_Brief_parklets_and_pedlets.pdf (higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com)
Parklet & Pedlet Manufacturers
Dero Parklet | Modular Urban Oasis
Modular Decking Systems | Prefab Outdoor Parklet Kits (archatrak.com)
Products - MODSTREET
About Parklets | Place Fab
41
NORTH BLACK POCKET PARKAUGUST 18TH, 202299 NORTH BLACK AVENUEEXISTING STREET TREESEXISTING PARKING LOTN. BLACK AVE.E. MENDENHALL ST.PLANTERS AND BENCHESREGRADING AND LOWERING OF STORMWATER INLET RIM ELEVATION TO ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGEPERMEABLE PAVERSEXISTING PLANTING BEDEXISTING SIDEWALK6” CONCRETE RIBBON AROUND ALL PERMEABLE PAVERSPERMEABLE PAVERS SITE FURNISHINGSPLANTINGS EXISTING SIDEWALKPLANTERS AND BENCHCES TO MATCH BOZEMAN DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP STANDARDS.PERMEABLE PAVERS PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BENEFITS OF RETURNING RAINFALL AND SNOWMELT INTO THE GROUNDWATER COMPARED TO STANDARD CONCRETE.PLANTINGS TO MATCH THE CHARACTER OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF POCKET PARK.NEW PLANTING BEDS WITH ROCK MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING MULCH WITHIN POCKET PARKADDITIONAL PLANTING BED OR MATCH EXISTING TURFPLANTINGS TO MATCH THE CHARACTER OF SOUTHERN PORTION OF POCKET PARKPAVER COURTYARD CONCEPTDEMO EXISTING LANDSCAPE EDGING AND GRASS STRIP AND REPLACE WITH ROCK MULCH TO MATCH ADJACENT PLANTING BED42
NORTH BLACK POCKET PARKAUGUST 18TH, 202299 NORTH BLACK AVENUEE. MENDENHALL ST.PLANTERS AND BENCHESCONCRETE TO MATCH SCORE PATTERN AND COLOR OF SOUTHERN PORTION OF POCKET PARK6” CONCRETE RIBBON BETWEEN EXISTING ASPHALT AND NEW CONCRETECONCRETESITE FURNISHINGSPLANTINGS CONCRETE PAVING TO MATCH THE SCORE PATTERN AND COLOR OF SOUTHERN PORTION OF POCKET PARK. ENSURES A CONSISTANT CHARACTER AND STYLE.CONCRETE COURTYARD CONCEPTN. BLACK AVE.PLANTERS AND BENCHCES TO MATCH BOZEMAN DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP STANDARDS.PLANTINGS TO MATCH THE CHARACTER OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF POCKET PARK.REGRADING AND LOWERING OF STORMWATER INLET RIM ELEVATION TO ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGEADDITIONAL PLANTING BED OR MATCH EXISTING TURFPLANTINGS TO MATCH THE CHARACTER OF SOUTHERN PORTION OF POCKET PARKEXISTING STREET TREESEXISTING PLANTING BEDEXISTING SIDEWALKNEW PLANTING BEDS WITH ROCK MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING MULCH WITHIN POCKET PARKDEMO EXISTING LANDSCAPE EDGING AND GRASS STRIP AND REPLACE WITH ROCK MULCH TO MATCH ADJACENT PLANTING BEDEXISTING PARKING LOTEXISTING SIDEWALK43
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
18098.33
Ellie Staley
Downtown URD Director
Bozeman, MT 59715
February 2023
44
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................ 2
Streets .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Sign Inventory ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Traffic & Pedestrian Data and Analysis ................................................................................................................................................. 2
Couplet Roadways & Conversions ........................................................................................................................................................ 3
Parking .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
On-Street Bicycle Lanes ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Vehicle Intersection Capacity ................................................................................................................................................................. 6
Signal Warrant Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Speed Data .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
Pedestrian Level of Service ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8
CRASH HISTORY ....................................................................................................................................... 8
Intersection Crash History ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Corridor Crash History ......................................................................................................................................................................... 12
Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures for Crash Reductions .......................................................................................................... 13
Uncontrolled Crossing Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures ........................................................................................................ 14
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES .............................................................................................. 15
High Visibility Crosswalk Markings ...................................................................................................................................................... 15
Parking Restrictions on Crosswalk Approach .................................................................................................................................. 16
Adequate Nighttime Lighting Levels .................................................................................................................................................... 16
Crosswalk Warning Signs ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Raised Crosswalks ................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
In-Street Pedestrian Signs ...................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Curb Extensions ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
City of Bozeman Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures ................................................................................................................... 17
Application of Pedestrian Countermeasures .................................................................................................................................... 18
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 21
Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
45
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study ii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1: SPEED DATA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
TABLE 2: PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................... 8
TABLE 3: CRASH, FREQUENCY & SEVERITY RATES ......................................................................................................................... 9
TABLE 4: INTERSECTION CRASH HISTORY (2014-2018).............................................................................................................. 10
TABLE 5: INTERSECTION CRASH HISTORY (2019-2022).............................................................................................................. 11
TABLE 6: CORRIDOR CRASH HISTORY (2014-2018) ..................................................................................................................... 12
TABLE 7: SUMMARY OF CRASH SEVERITY FOR CORRIDOR CRASHES (2014-2018) ......................................................... 13
TABLE 8: MOST FREQUENT CAUSE OF CORRIDOR CRASHES BY SEVERITY (2014-2018) .............................................. 13
TABLE 9: BEST PRACTICES & COUNTERMEASURES FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, FHWA ................................................. 14
TABLE 10: SAFETY ISSUES ADDRESSED PER COUNTERMEASURES, FHWA .......................................................................... 15
TABLE 11: PEDESTRIAN COUNTERMEASURES CURRENTLY IN USE FOR BOZEMAN ..................................................... 17
TABLE 12: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY TREATMENTS & COSTS ............................................................................................................ 18
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS (2022) PEAK HOUR VEHICLE MOVEMENTS ................................................................. 4
FIGURE 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS (2022) PEAK HOUR PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES MOVEMENTS ................................... 5
FIGURE 3: APPLICATION OF PEDESTRIAN COUNTERMEASURES BABCOCK ST/BLACK AVE. .................................... 19
FIGURE 4: APPLICATION OF PEDESTRIAN COUNTERMEASURES MENDENHALL ST/TRACY AVE ........................... 20
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: SIGN INVENTORY SHEETS
APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN COUNT WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX C: CAPACITY CALCULATIONS AND TABLES
APPENDIX D: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
APPENDIX E: SPEED DATA
46
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 1
INTRODUCTION
The Downtown Bozeman Transportation Study was initiated in 2020 with Part 1 being completed in December 2020.
It evaluated design concepts for the recommended improvements in the 2019 Downtown Bozeman Improvement
Plan (DBIP) for the following downtown streets: Babcock Street, Main Street and Mendenhall Street.
Sanderson Stewart is currently contracted with the Downtown Bozeman Partnership to complete the Babcock &
Mendenhall Safety Improvements Study, which consists of data analysis and a traffic safety study focusing on corridor
and intersection improvements along Babcock Street and Mendenhall Street. This report will provide a summary of
the data analysis and safety solutions for the corridors and intersections.
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A study was performed to evaluate the downtown Bozeman operational and safety existing conditions and concerns,
specifically for the corridors of Mendenhall Street and Babcock Street, between Tracy Avenue and Black Avenue. The
corridors were studied, and a sign inventory was performed to help determine existing conditions for evaluation and
recommended improvements. The Traffic volumes were collected and evaluated to determine the AM, noon and PM
peak hours of travel which correlated with 8:30-9:30 AM, 11:45-12:45 PM, and 4:45-5:45 PM, respectively.
Intersection capacity calculations were performed to determine that all intersections operate at an acceptable level of
service, a qualitative measure of performance of an intersection abased on speed and travel time, freedom to
maneuver and comfort and convenience. No vehicular traffic signal warrants were met.
A speed study was performed to determine travel speeds along the corridors. It was found that 85 percent of traffic
travels between 27 and 30 mph on both corridors of Mendenhall Street and Babcock Street. Pedestrian and bicycle
volumes were collected and evaluated to determine the AM, noon, and PM peak hours of travel. There was no clue
morning peak hour for pedestrians/bicyclists, but a noon peak hour of 12:15-1:15 PM was evident with a smaller peak
at 2:15-3:15 PM. Pedestrian level of service, which measures connectivity, directness and safety were found to be
acceptable on Mendenhall Street, Main Street and Babcock Street.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A crash analysis was performed to determine crash trends regarding frequency and severity at intersections and along
the corridors. A historical crash rate higher than predicted was found at Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue. It was
determined that pedestrian crashes typically resulted in injuries. There were four (4) pedestrian crashes in the study
area, and several rear-end collisions resulting from a lead vehicle stopping for a pedestrian. Corridor crashes typically
involved right angle crashes involving vehicles leaving access points, rear-end collisions and pedestrian/bicycle collisions,
with the latter resulting in the most severe crashes.
A summary of FHWA’s pedestrian safety countermeasures was provided. For roadways in the project area, per FHWA
guidance, it is suggested that high visibility crosswalk markings, parking restrictions on crosswalk approaches, adequate
nighttime lighting level and pedestrian crossing warning signs always be considered. Additionally, consideration should be
given to raised crosswalks, in-street pedestrian crossing signs, and curb extensions. Each project intersection was
evaluated for presence of the suggested countermeasures, and two (2) study area intersections, Tracy
47
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 2
Avenue/Mendenhall and Babcock Street/Black Street were used as example intersections. Graphics to illustrate the
application of potential countermeasures and costs were provided. Recommendations to the study area were provided
to help improve safety in downtown Bozeman, including the installation of curb bulb outs/extensions, increased
crosswalk signs and pavement markings, lighting and restricting parking.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Streets
Babcock Street (eastbound) and Mendenhall Street (westbound) are both one-way streets with two (2) travel lanes,
Main Street has a four-lane section with two travel lanes in each direction, and the north/south streets through
downtown generally have two-lane sections with two-way traffic. All downtown streets generally provide parallel
parking on both sides of the street and there is consistent sidewalk throughout the project area.
There are painted striped crosswalks across all legs of every intersection in the downtown area. Pedestrian crossings at
Main Street intersections are controlled by traffic signals. There are curb bulb-outs on some corners for pedestrian
crossings along Babcock Street, but no other permanent pedestrian facilities currently exist in the study area.
Temporary painted curb bulb-outs with delineators were installed during the summer of 2022 at the Babcock
Street/Black Avenue intersection.
Mendenhall Street and Babcock Street have transit stops, and on Mendenhall Street there is a transit slip lane between
the Tracy Avenue and Black Avenue cross streets, allowing buses to stop in a protected area and providing passenger
safety without impacting traffic negatively.
Sign Inventory
A sign inventory was performed for the study area and details all signs on the corridors of Mendenhall Street and
Babcock Street between North 5th Avenue and Willson Avenue. The inventory is provided for knowledge regarding
existing signs, to coordinate wayfinding information and to help consolidate signage in the downtown area. Appendix A
includes Exhibits A and B that detail the location of signs on the two corridors.
Traffic & Pedestrian Data and Analysis
Weekday AM, noon, and PM peak hour vehicle turning movement and bike/pedestrian counts were collected for study
area intersections on Wednesday, July 13, 2022. The following study area intersections were evaluated because they are
the heaviest traveled corridors located in the heart of downtown, where there is a focus on redevelopment and the
most potential for traffic modifications such as traffic signals and bicycle corridors:
Mendenhall Street/Black Avenue
Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue
Main Street/Black Avenue
Main Street/Tracy Avenue
Babcock Street/Black Avenue
48
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 3
Babcock Street/Tracy Avenue
The traffic data was collected using Miovision Scout video-based systems. In general, the weekday AM, noon, and PM
vehicle peak hour periods were found to occur from 8:30-9:30 AM, 11:45 AM-12:45 PM, and 4:45-5:45 PM. Raw count
data was adjusted for seasonal variation using MDT seasonal adjustment factors. Figure 1 (page 4) summarizes the
Existing Conditions (2022) peak hour turning movement volumes for the AM, noon, and PM peak hours. Bike and
pedestrian peak hours were slightly different than the vehicle peak hours, with no clear peak in the morning and the
highest-volume hour of 12:15-1:15 PM, with a second smaller peak from 2:15-3:15 PM. Figure 2 (page 5) shows Existing
Conditions (2022) bike/pedestrian counts for those peak hours, as well as AM volumes during the vehicle peak hour of
8:30-9:30 AM. Detailed vehicle traffic and bike/pedestrian count data worksheets are included in Appendix B.
Truck traffic was observed during the peak hours previously mentioned. During the AM, noon and PM peak hours,
truck traffic on Babcock Street compromised 1.8%, 1.4% and 1.5% of all traffic, respectively. During the AM, noon and
PM peak hours on Mendenhall Street, truck traffic was observed to be 5.2%, 2.7% and 2.0% of traffic, respectively. On
Main Street, during the AM, noon and PM peak hours, trucks were 2.8%/3.0% (eastbound/westbound), 2.5%/4.0%
(eastbound/westbound), and 1.6%/0.7% (eastbound/westbound) of traffic, respectively. Truck traffic on Tracy Avenue
at Mendenhall Street was highest on the southbound approaches during all peak hours, with the AM peak, noon and
PM peak hours making up 15.4%, 9.7% and 5.1% of all traffic, respectively.
Couplet Roadways & Conversions
Babcock Street and Mendenhall Street are couplets serving downtown Bozeman. Couplets are two parallel one-way
roadways that run in opposite directions to provide two-way mobility in a specific area and typically connect to
roadways with two-way traffic. They are established to provide greater capacity for vehicles and provide an opportunity
to reduce pedestrian crossing distances by adding curb extensions or narrowing travel lanes. They typically have fewer
intersection turning movements that may increase safety and improve pedestrian crossing safety as vehicles are
approaching from one less direction. They also provide an opportunity to create bicycle lanes and/or, in Bozeman’s
context, on-street parking.
Disadvantages of couplets include increased travel time and out of direction travel for local residents, delays for
emergency vehicles, and without appropriate traffic management strategies, they may provide context for increased
vehicle speeds. One-way streets are typically associated with higher speeds and multi-lane one-way streets create a
multiple threat condition for pedestrians crossing a road. Additionally, left-turning motor vehicle drivers may be less
cautious when turning from a one-way street, and therefore less inclined to notice a pedestrian.
In terms of pedestrian safety, there are benefits to both one-way and two-way streets, and so the decision to convert a
one-way street to two-way is context sensitive. FHWA highlighted one-way/two-way street conversions in a case study,
PedSafe 2013, Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasures Selection System, and suggested one-way streets should have
traffic calming features to reduce vehicle speeds and design features, such as curb extensions and turning radius
reductions, to discourage high vehicular speeds.
49
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 4 Figure 1: Existing Conditions (2022) Vehicle Turning Movements for Peak Hours50
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 5 Figure 2: Existing Conditions (2022) Pedestrian/Bicycle Turning Movements for Peak Hours 51
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 6
Parking
Main Street has on-street parallel parking on both sides of the street throughout the project corridor, with parking at
some intersections less than 20 feet from the crosswalks. Babcock Street has on-street parallel parking on the south side
throughout the project area and on the north side of the roadway east of Bozeman Avenue and west of Black Avenue.
Parking extends to approximately 30 feet from crosswalks, and the intersection with Tracy Avenue has bulb-outs on
each corner with the exception of the southwest corner. Mendenhall Street has parallel parking on both sides of the
street throughout the project area with the exception of the block between Black Avenue and Tracy Avenue, where a
transit island is present. The distance of on-street parking on Mendenhall Street varies but is typically approximately 20
feet from the crosswalks. There are several locations in downtown Bozeman where trucks double park in traffic lanes
for unloading and/or loading. Consideration should be given to providing a 15-minute loading/unloading space in areas
that have frequent double-parked trucks that are unloading/loading at local businesses.
On-Street Bicycle Lanes
Under existing conditions there are no on-street bicycle lanes in the downtown study area. Some roadways have
“sharrows,” pavement markings designating that vehicles and cyclists share the road. In the summer the City provides
bicycle racks located in on-street parking stalls to encourage bicycling. Consideration should be given to consistently
painting sharrows on downtown roads to bring awareness to bicyclists and drivers that they are sharing the roadways.
In the 2019 DBIP study, one concept was to remove the north side on-street parking on Babcock Street and replace it
with a two-way cycle track to provide cyclists a separated space instead of sharing the roadway and/or sidewalks.
Narrowed drive lanes were suggested to provide traffic calming to lower speeds and allow room for the cycle track.
The report also recognized that providing a cycle track was a challenge with the width constraints on Babcock Street
the presence of numerous driveway egresses, the existing traffic control at intersections which presently is for
eastbound only traffic and would result in the loss of 81 on-street parking spaces. Due to the mentioned challenges,
sharrows were recommended in both lanes for Babcock Street and Mendenhall Street in the 2019 DBIP, and in the
southern lane of Mendenhall Street and as a secondary option on Babcock Street (to create a cycle track) in the Phase 1
Downtown Bozeman study. Consideration should be given to applying sharrow pavement markings uniformly
throughout downtown.
Vehicle Intersection Capacity
Existing Conditions (2022) vehicle intersection capacity calculations were performed for the study area intersections
using Synchro, Version 11, which is based on the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (Transportation Research Board,
2016). Level of service (LOS) is defined as a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream,
generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions,
comfort, and convenience. LOS is a qualitative measure of the performance of an intersection with values ranging from
LOS A, which indicates good operation and low vehicle delays, to LOS F, which indicates congestion and longer vehicle
delays. LOS C is typically considered a minimum acceptable threshold for operations in Montana-based communities,
though exceptions are made in certain cases.
The results of the Existing Conditions (2022) vehicle intersection capacity calculations showed that all intersections and
approaches operate at LOS C or better during all three peak hours. Projected 95th percentile queues are minimal on all
52
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 7
approaches. Figure 1 also shows the Existing Conditions (2022) LOS results at each intersection. A detailed capacity
summary table and capacity calculation worksheets for each of the study area intersections can be found in Appendix C.
Signal Warrant Analysis
Traffic signal warrants were evaluated at the four (4) stop-controlled intersections of Mendenhall Street and Babcock
Street with Tracy Avenue and Black Avenue using criteria outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) for the Existing Conditions (2022) vehicular traffic volume scenario. The MUTCD presents several warrants
that can be considered based on traffic volumes, school crossings, crash history, and others. For the purposes of this
analysis, all but Warrants 5 and 9 (School Crossing and Intersection Near a Railroad Grade Crossing) were evaluated
because there are no school or railroad crossings near the intersections. Satisfaction of the Peak Hour warrant alone
should not be considered as warranting a signal, as it is primarily meant for application at office complexes,
manufacturing plants, or other high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a
short time.
Signal warrants are not close to being met at any of the four (4) intersections when evaluated with Existing Conditions
(2022) volumes. Traffic signal warrant worksheets can be found in Appendix D.
Speed Data
Speed data was gathered using StatTrak Data Collectors and Houston Radar Stats Analyzer on July 11-15, 2022, on
Babcock Street between Black Avenue and Bozeman Avenue, Babcock Street between South 3rd Avenue and South
Grand Avenue, Mendenhall Street between North 3rd Avenue and North Grand Avenue, and Mendenhall Street
between North Bozeman Avenue and Rouse Avenue. Posted speeds on all roadways are 25 mph. 50th percentile and
85th percentile speeds, the speeds that 50 percent of traffic and 85 percent of traffic are observed to travel at or below
during free-flow conditions, were collected in addition to maximum speeds and are illustrated in Table 1 below.
85th percentile speeds are used to help establish appropriate speed limits. It should be noted that the radar unit on
Mendenhall Street between 3rd Avenue and Grand Avenue had sporadic high speeds (8 data points over 70 mph), so
that data was manually removed from the analysis. Speed data summary sheets can be found in Appendix E.
Table 1: Speed Data
Mendenhall -
3rd & Grand
Mendenhall -
Bozeman & Rouse
Babcock -
Black & Bozeman
Babcock -
3rd & Grand
Date 7/11-13/2022 7/13-15/2022 7/13-15/2022 7/11-13/2022
Direction of Vehicles Westbound Westbound Eastbound Eastbound
ADT (veh) 5,148 4,355 5,774 4,497
85th Percentile Speed (mph) 30 27 28 30
Max speed (mph) 49 55 49 48
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 26 23 24 26
53
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 8
Eighty-fifth (85th) percentile speeds collected on Mendenhall Street and Babcock Street exceeded the posted speed limit
of 25 mph, with 85th percentile speeds being 27 mph and 28 mph within the immediate downtown area (Bozeman
Avenue and Rouse Avenue) and slightly higher (30 mph) further outside of the center of downtown (3rd Avenue and
Grand Avenue).
Pedestrian Level of Service
Motor vehicles on roadways have a level of service (LOS) that is a quality measure describing operational conditions
within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to manuever,
traffic interuptions, and comfort and convenience. Similarly, an algorithm to determine pedestrian LOS has been created
with considerations including a combination of connectivity, directness, safety and capacity measures. Table 2 below
presents the pedestrian LOS for the downtown intersections on Mendenhall Street and Babcock Street. Generally,
pedestrians do not have a long wait before being able to cross with either a break in traffic or vehicles yielding to
pedestrians. The LOS was higher on Main Street, most likely due to signalized pedestrian crossings providing more
protection.
Table 2: Pedestrian Level of Service
CRASH HISTORY
Crashes for corridor segements and study area intersections were evaluated to determine any trends with regards to
frequency or severity and potential safety treatments.
Intersection Crash History
Historical intersection and corridor crash data was obtained from MDT for the 5-year period from January 1, 2014,
through December 31, 2018. Crash data was collected from the City of Bozeman Police Department from January 1,
2019 through October 2022 and evaluated separately. The data was analyzed for the purposes of calculating intersection
crash and severity rates and evaluating corridor and intersection collision type trends. Tables 3 (page 9) and 4 (page 10)
illustrate the results of the historical crash analysis.
Intersection crash rates were calculated on the standard basis of crashes per million vehicles entering (MVE) for each
intersection. The MVE metric was estimated based on 2022 peak hour traffic counts and published historical ADT
Road Segment Pedestrian Level
of Service
2.05 (B)
1.25 (A)
1.68 (B)
Mendenhall
Tracy to Black
Main
Tracy to Black
Babcock
Tracy to Black
54
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 9
volumes from the MDT website. Crash rates for the study area intersections ranged from 0.17 crashes/MVE to 0.86
crashes/MVE.
As a means of evaluating the historical crash frequency rates, Sanderson Stewart calculated expected rates using the
predictive crash rate formulas in the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
Highway Safety Manual (HSM). The process involves calculating the number of crashes predicted in a year based on
traffic demand (AADTs) and various physical and traffic environment-based conditions such as lane configurations, traffic
signal phasing, and approach speeds. The calculations result in a crashes-per-year prediction. Sanderson Stewart then
back calculated a frequency rate on the basis of MVE for the sake of comparison with the actual historical crash rate.
The results of the calculations for this study showed that the historical crash rate was slightly higher than the predicted
crash rate at the intersection of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue. The historical crash rates were lower than the
predicted crash rates at all other study area intersections. The HSM rate predictions and 5-year crash totals for each
intersection are summarized in Table 3 below.
Severity index is defined as the weighted average by crash severity, including fatality, injury, and property damage only
(PDO) crashes. The highest severity index was 3.00 at the intersection of Mendenhall Street/Black Avenue due to the
only crash resulting in injuries. At the intersection of Main Street/Black Avenue the severity index was 2.00, due to 2 of
4 (50%) of crashes resulting in injuries. Overall, pedestrian crashes typically resulted in injuries, with 2 of 4 (50%)
pedestrian crashes resulting in severe injuries. The two severe injury related pedestrian crashes occurred at the
intersections of Babcock Street/Tracy Avenue and Mendenhall Street/Black Avenue with dry pavement and clear
weather conditions, and the latter pedestrian crash occurred in the dark. Severity index calculation results are also
shown in Table 3.
Sanderson Stewart performed an analysis of intersection collision classification to determine if any patterns could be
identified. Table 4 on page 10 illustrates the results of the types of crashes in the study area. There is a history of rear-
end crashes on the Main Street intersections and the intersection of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue. The intersection
of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue also had 2 of 5 (40%) of crashes due to right-angle collisions. The intersections
PDO Injury Fatality
Average
Crash
Frequency
(Crash/Yr)
Crash
Rate
(Crash/
MVE)
Severity
Index
Predicted
Average
Crash
Frequency
(Crash/Yr)
Predicted
Crash Rate
(Crash/
MVE)
Mendenhall St/Black Ave 3078 1 0 1 0 0.20 0.18 3.00 0.94 0.84
Mendenhall St/Tracy Ave 3178 5 4 1 0 1.00 0.86 1.40 0.92 0.79
Main St/Black Ave 13097 4 2 2 0 0.80 0.17 2.00 1.49 0.31
Main St/Tracy Ave 15095 5 3 2 0 1.00 0.18 1.80 2.72 0.49
Babcock St/Black Ave 4029 2 2 0 0 0.40 0.27 1.00 1.14 0.78
Babcock St/Tracy Ave 3853 4 3 1 0 0.80 0.57 1.50 1.16 0.82
1 Daily Entering Volume (DEV) estimated from 2022 peak hour counts and 2014 through 2018 MDT published ADTs
2 Crashes reported from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018
3 Crash rates expressed as crashes per million vehicles entering (MVE)
⁴ Rates calculated using Highway Safety Manual (HSM) 1st Edition predictive methodology using SPICE tool
HSM Predictions⁴
Intersection
Crash Data3Crash Type
2014-2018
DEV1
Reported
Crashes2
Table 3: Crash Frequency and Severity, 2014-2018
55
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 10
along Babcock Street and Main Street each had 1 sideswipe, same direction crash. There were 4 pedestrian crashes at
the six (6) intersections, including one at each of the following intersections: Babcock Street/Tracy Avenue, Main
Street/Black Avenue, Main Street/Tracy Avenue and Mendenhall Street/Black Avenue.
*Crashes reported from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018
Rear-end collisions commonly occur at signalized intersections because the signalized control is dynamic, and thereby
requires drivers to recognize and react to changing conditions in real time. High speeds approaching signalized
intersections allow drivers less response time, which creates an opportunity for an increased chance of rear-end
collisions. Another potential contributing factor for rear-end collisions at a signalized intersection is a yellow change
interval that is too short for the prevailing operating speeds in that corridor.
Based on the application of yellow change interval formulas from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic
Engineering Handbook with assumed 25 mph thru-movement operating speeds, it was calculated that the minimum
“design” yellow change intervals of 3.0 seconds for the approaches are adequate. For intersections where the 85th
percentile speeds are closer to 30 mph, then the 3.0 second yellow clearance may be inadequate. Consideration should
be given to increasing the yellow clearances to 3.2 seconds to conform to ITE recommendations that more closely
match the 85th percentile speeds of 30 mph.
The unsignalized intersection of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue had 2 of 5 (40%) of crashes due to rear-end collisions,
and 2 of 5 (40%) due to right-angle collisions. Both rear-end collisions involved westbound vehicles. One (1) rear-end
collision occurred when a westbound vehicle hit a parked vehicle in snowy conditions. The other rear-end collision
occurred when a westbound vehicle failed to yield to the vehicle in front of it during dark, lighted conditions with dry
pavement and clear weather. More information would need to be provided to determine exact crash causes.
Right-angle collisions often occur at unsignalized intersections after a driver stops at a stop sign and then proceeds when
it is unsafe to do so due to limited sight distance or inadequately judging gaps in vehicles. At the intersection of
Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue both crashes involved a westbound vehicle colliding with a southbound vehicle. It may
be possible that higher speeds on Mendenhall Street make it difficult for minor road drivers to judge vehicle gaps.
Increasing visibility for the intersection on the minor roadway may also help to improve safety. More visible pavement
markings and the application of a larger stop sign on Tracy Avenue may call more attention to the intersection to help
increase safety. Although not necessarily the cause of right-angle collisions with southbound vehicles, on the south
approach of this intersection it is possible that sight distance may be prohibited to the east by the trees located on the
Rear
End
Right
Angle LT, SD SS, SD Pedestrian Other Total
Mendenhall St/Black Ave 1 1
Mendenhall St/Tracy Ave 2 2 1 5
Main St/Black Ave 2 1 1 4
Main St/Tracy Ave 2 1 1 1 5
Babcock St/Black Ave 1 1 2
Babcock St/Tracy Ave 1 1 1 1 4
Collision Type
Table 4: Intersection Crash History – Collision Type, 2014-2018
56
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 11
southeast quadrant of the intersection. Consideration should be given to maintaining and pruning the trees to help
improve sight distance and improve safety.
Sideswipe, same direction crashes typically occur at intersections when there are not dedicated turn lanes and when
vehicles switch lanes to avoid slowing or queued vehicles approaching a turning movement. At the unsignalized
intersection of Babcock Street/Tracy Avenue, one (1) sideswipe, same direction crash occurred due to an eastbound
vehicle colliding with a vehicle that was changing lanes. The other sideswipe crash at Babcock Street/Black Avenue
involved an eastbound vehicle hitting a parked car during clear daylight conditions. More detailed crash data would be
needed to determine the exact causes of the crashes.
The intersections of Main Street/Black Avenue and Main Street/Tracy Avenue had one (1) sideswipe, same direction
crash. The crashes at both Main Street/Black Avenue and Main Street/Tracy Avenue involved westbound parked vehicles
entering the traffic lane and being sideswiped by a passing vehicle.
The four (4) pedestrian crashes occurring at the study area intersections (Babcock Street/Tracy Avenue, Main
Street/Black Avenue, Main Street/Tracy Avenue and Mendenhall Street/Black Avenue) typically occurred with clear
weather conditions and dry pavement and all crashes resulted in injuries. Two (2) crashes involved vehicles making a
left-turn and the other two (2) crashes involved vehicles traveling straight before hitting the pedestrian. More crash
information would need to be provided to determine exact causes and potential safety countermeasures, however
enhanced pedestrian crossings and lower vehicle speeds through the high pedestrian traveled intersections may help
improve pedestrian safety.
Crash data was collected from the City of Bozeman Police Department for the period of January 1, 2019 through
October 21, 2022 for the intersections of Babcock Street/Tracy Avenue, Babcock Street/Black Avenue, Mendenhall
Street/Tracy Avenue and Mendenhall Street/Black Avenue. Collision types for corridor crashes are provided in Table 5
below:
*Crashes reported from January 1, 2019 to October 21, 2022
SS, SD LT, SD Rear End
Right
Angle
Fixed
Object Pedestrian
Mendenhall Street/
Black Avenue 2 4 1 1 4 1
Mendenhall Street/
Tracy Ave 1 1 2 1
Babcock Street/
Black Avenue 2 1 1 5 1
Babcock Street/
Tracy Ave 4 3 2 1 1
Intersection
Collision Type
Table 5: Intersection Crash History -- Collision Type, 2019-2022
57
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 12
Common crash types were sideswipe, same direction crashes that occurred when vehicles were switching lanes and
failed to yield to a vehicle in the adjacent lane. Left-turn, same direction crashes commonly occurred when vehicles
were making a left-turn from the far travel lane on the one-way roadway and collided with a vehicle in the internal lane.
There were several rear-end collisions, often occurring when the lead vehicles were stopping for a pedestrian, and
several right-angle collisions involving a left-turning vehicle colliding with a through moving vehicle. One pedestrian crash
was recorded. Crash severity was not available from this crash database.
Corridor Crash History
Corridor crash data was evaluated for the five-year period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018 to determine
trends along the downtown corridors of Babcock Street and Mendenhall Street between Willson Avenue and Rouse
Avenue. Previously referenced Black Avenue and Tracy Avenue intersection-related crashes are included in Table 6
(below) which summarizes crash data, but will not be discussed in detail.
Babcock Street, between Willson Avenue and Rouse Avenue, had two (2) non-intersection related crashes. Both
crashes (one coded as sideswipe, same direction and the other as a rear-end collision) involved a vehicle colliding with a
parked car and resulted in no injuries. The remaining crashes occurred at intersections or accesses along Babcock
Street. There were 2 of 24 (8%) crashes involving pedestrians/bicyclists and both resulted in injuries. Fifteen (15) of 24
(63%) crashes were right-angle collisions and 5 of 15 (33%) right-angle collisions resulted in injuries. The most severe
crashes on Babcock Street were a pedestrian related crash with an eastbound vehicle near Tracy Avenue and a right-
angle collision that resulted in a severe injury at Babcock Street/Willson Avenue. This crash involved an eastbound and a
southbound vehicle.
*Crashes reported from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018
On Mendenhall Street, between Willson Avenue and Rouse Avenue, there were two (2) crashes that were not
intersection related. Both crashes involved vehicles colliding with parked vehicles; one crash was reported as a
sideswipe, same direction and the other as a rear-end collision and both crashes resulted in property damage only. The
remainder of the crashes along the corridor of Mendenhall Street occurred at intersections. There were two bicycle
related crashes that occurred at the intersections of Mendenhall Street/Willson Avenue and Mendenhall Street/Bozeman
Avenue. Both bicycle crashes resulted in injuries.
When evaluating crashes, it is important to consider both crash frequency and severity. Table 7 (page 13) provides the
breakdown of crash severity for crashes along the Babcock Street and Mendenhall Street corridors. On Babcock Street,
between Willson Avenue and Rouse Avenue, 17 of 24 (71%) crashes were property damage only with the remaining
29% resulting in various levels of severity. Mendenhall Street had 4 of 14 (29%) crashes resulting in some type of injury.
Babcock Street
S Willson Ave - S Rouse Ave 1 1 2 3 15 2 24
W Mendenhall Street
S Willson Ave - S Rouse Ave 5 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 15
Right
Angle
Backing
Vehicle Pedestrian Bicycle TotalCorridorRear
End
Fell
from
Vehicle
Fixed
Object LT, SD SS,SD
Table 6: Corridor Crash History – Collision Type, 2014-2018
58
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 13
*Crashes reported from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018
The most frequent crash types that resulted in injuries are presented in Table 8 (below). On Babcock Street the most
severe crashes were caused by right-angle and pedestrian collisions. Mendenhall Street had the most severe injury
crashes because of pedestrian and bicycle collisions. Pedestrian and bicycle safety countermeasures may help reduce the
severity of crashes.
*Crashes reported from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018
It is important to note that all the previous evaluations are speculative, and more detailed information about individual
crashes would be needed to determine exact causes for each collision.
Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures for Crash Reductions
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has created a Best Practices Toolbox of countermeasures and their
potential effectiveness to reduce pedestrian crashes. Signalization, geometric and operational countermeasures are
provided in the Toolbox with their targeted crash type (fatality, injury, property damage only or all) and calculated crash
reduction factor (CRF), the percentage crash reduction that might be expected after implementing a given
countermeasure.
The countermeasures that may be applicable to Mendenhall Street, Main Street and Babcock Street are summarized in
Table 9 on page 14. More specific information on applications in Bozeman follow in the report.
Property
Damage Only
Possible
Injury Crash
Suspected
Minor Injury
Suspected
Severe Injury
Babcock Street
S Willson Ave - S Rouse Ave 17 1 4 2
W Mendenhall Street
S Willson Ave - S Rouse Ave 10 2 1 1
Corridor
Crash Severity
Table 7: Summary of Crash Severity for Corridor Crashes, 2014-2018
Corridor Possible Injury
Crash
Suspected
Minor Injury Suspected
Severe Injury
Babcock St Right Angle
Pedestrian
Right Angle (3)
Pedestrian
Right Angle
Mendenhall St Rear End (2)
Bicycle Bicycle Pedestrian
Table 8: Most Frequent Cause of Corridor Crashes by Severity
59
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 14
Uncontrolled Crossing Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures
FHWA’s Best Practices Toolbox includes the Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations (2018)
to address safety issues at locations where pedestrian facilities intersect with uncontrolled roadways. The guide helps
assist with selecting appropriate countermeasures based on roadway volumes, posted speeds and lane configurations to
improve crossing safety. For a two-lane roadway, with posted speeds of 30 mph or below with AADT of less than 9,000
vehicles per day, the following pedestrian crash countermeasures should always be implemented if feasible:
· High visibility crosswalk markings
· Parking restrictions on crosswalk approaches
· Adequate nighttime lighting levels
· Pedestrian crossing warning signs
Additionally, consideration should also be given to the following countermeasures:
· Raised crosswalks
· In-street pedestrian crossing sign
· Curb extensions
Table 9: Best Practices Toolbox of Countermeasures for Pedestrian Safety, FHWA
Countermeasure Crash Severity
CRF for Pedestrian
Crashes (%)
Add exclusive pedestrian phasing All 34
Replace Walk/Don’t Walk Signals with
Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads All 25
Modify signal phasing (implement a leading
pedestrian interval)All 5
All 30
Fatal/Injury 36
All 21
(nighttime crashes)
Injury 27
(nighttime crashes)
Prohibit Right Turn on Red 3
Prohibit Left Turns 10
Restrict on-street parking near
intersections All 30
Signalization Countermeasures
Geometric Countermeasures
Install Raised Pedestrian Crossing
Signs/Markings/Operational Countermeasures
Add Intersection Lighting
60
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 15
The evaluated countermeasures help address conflicts with crossing locations, vehicle speeds, inadequate
conspicuity/visibility, drivers not yielding to pedestrians, and insufficient separation of pedestrians from traffic as shown
in Table 10 (below) from the guide.
*These countermeasures make up the STEP Countermeasures. Crossing visibility enhancements and multiple countermeasures may
be implemented at a location as part of crosswalk visibility enhancements.
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES
FHWA has compiled proven pedestrian safety countermeasures including crosswalk visibility enhancements; these
enhancements include high visibility crosswalks, lighting, and signing and pavement markings to make crosswalks, and
users, more visible to drivers.
High Visibility Crosswalk Markings
High visibility crosswalk markings use patterns (bar pairs, continental, ladder) that are visible to both the driver and
pedestrian from farther away compared to traditional transverse line crosswalks. Both FHWA and the National
Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) suggest the use of retroreflective pavement markings to improve
safety. Retroreflective materials such as inlay or thermoplastic tape, instead of paint or brick, should be used for highly
reflective crosswalk markings to improve safety, particularly at night. They should be provided at all established mid-
block pedestrian crossings and considered at all uncontrolled intersections. Their application is anticipated to reduce
pedestrian injury crashes up to 40%.
Conflicts at
crossing
locations
Excessive
Vehicle
Speed
Inadequate
Conspicuity/
Visibility
Drivers not
yielding to
pedestrians
in crosswalks
Insufficient
separation
from traffic
Crosswalk Visibility Enhancement
High-visibility crosswalk markings*
Parking restriction on crosswalk approach*
Improved nighttime lighting*
Advance yield here to pedestrian sign and yield line*
In-Street pedestrian crossing sign*
Curb Extension*
Raised Crosswalk
Pedestrian Refuge Island
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
Road Diet
Rectangular Rapid- Flashing Beacon
Pedestrian Crash Countermeasure
for Uncontrolled Crossings
Safety Issue Addressed
Table 10: Safety Issues Addressed Per Countermeasure, FHWA
61
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 16
Parking Restrictions on Crosswalk Approach
The FHWA acknowledges that on-street parking has an important relationship to pedestrian and motorist’s safety. On-
street parking can create a buffer, separating pedestrians from vehicular traffic on the adjacent roadway and reducing
motorist’s travel speeds. However, on-street parking also blocks visibility between the pedestrians and the motorists,
particularly for children.
Parking restrictions can include the removal of parking spots close to an intersection, installation of new “parking
prohibited” pavement markings or curb paint and signs. The suggested minimum setback is 20 feet in advance of a
crosswalk where speeds are 25 mph or less. Thirty (30) foot setbacks are recommended for speeds between 26 and 35
mph, which would be more appropriate for the Downtown Bozeman intersections. The negative aspects of restricting
curb parking are that it may eliminate a parking space for motorists, which may be opposed by nearby business owners,
and potential increases in speeds for vehicles, which is also undesirable for pedestrians. Restricting on-street parking
near intersections has been proven to reduce pedestrian crashes by 30%.
Adequate Nighttime Lighting Levels
To provide adequate nighttime lighting levels, consideration should be given to placing lights in advance of midblock and
intersection crosswalks on both approaches to illuminate the front of the pedestrian and avoid creating a silhouette.
Intersection lighting has been proven to reduce all pedestrian nighttime crashes by 21% and injury pedestrian nighttime
crashes by 27%.
Crosswalk Warning Signs
Crosswalk warning signs are advanced crosswalk yield signs that are placed 20-50 feet in advance of a marked crosswalk
to indicate where vehicles are required to yield to pedestrians. To supplement the signing, a yield bar (commonly
referred to as “shark’s teeth”) pavement marking can be used to indicate where vehicles are required to yield. Advanced
crosswalk signs are typically used when a crossing is unexpected, such as mid-block. They have shown a reduction of
25% in pedestrian crashes.
Raised Crosswalks
Raised crosswalks are ramped speed tables spanning the entire width of the roadway to make the pedestrian more
prominent in the driver’s field of vision. The crossing is marked with paint or special paving materials. These crosswalks
may reduce vehicle speeds, improve motorist yielding and allow the pedestrian to cross at grade. The raised crosswalk is
flush with the height of the sidewalk and is typically at least ten feet wide so a vehicle’s front and back tires can be on
the table at the same time. Drainage needs to be given careful consideration. Raised crosswalks may not be appropriate
for primary emergency vehicle routes and can be a concern for snowplowing. They have shown a 45% reduction in
pedestrian crashes.
62
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 17
In-Street Pedestrian Signs
In-street yield to pedestrian signing may be appropriate on 2- or 3-lane roads where speed limits are 30 mph or less.
They serve to remind road users of laws regarding yielding to pedestrians and are typically placed in between travel
lanes. They can be a concern for snowplowing due to their location in the middle of the roadway. There currently is no
crash reduction factor calculated for in-street pedestrian signs.
Curb Extensions
An alternative to improve safety and maintain parking is to provide curb extensions, also referred to as bulb-outs, at
pedestrian crossings. Curb extensions extend the sidewalk or curb line out into the parking lane, which reduces the
street width. They shorten the distance for pedestrians to cross, allow the pedestrians to be more visible to motorists
approaching intersections, and provide protection for pedestrians trying to view approaching vehicles instead of walking
into a lane of traffic.
Curb extensions can improve accessibility for emergency vehicles as intersections are kept clear of parked cars. They
can also be used to place landscaping or streetscaping. Curb extensions must not extend into travel lanes and should not
extend into bicycle lanes. There currently is no crash reduction factor calculated for curb extensions.
City of Bozeman Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures
Mendenhall Street and Babcock Street were evaluated to determine which of the suggested countermeasures from
FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations are currently installed at the
uncontrolled crossings of Bozeman Avenue, Black Avenue and Tracy Avenue. Table 11 below illustrates the
countermeasures currently installed.
Babcock/
Bozeman
Babcock/
Black
Babcock/
Tracy
Mendenhall/
Bozeman
Mendenhall
/Black
Mendenhall
/Tracy
High Visibility Crosswalk Markings
Parking Restrictions on Crosswalk Approach
Adequate Nighttime Lighting Levels
Crosswalk Warning Signs
Raised Crosswalks
In-Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign
Curb Extension
Treatment
Intersections
Table 11: Pedestrian Countermeasures Currently in Use in Bozeman
63
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 18
Application of Pedestrian Countermeasures
Sanderson Stewart met with the Downtown Bozeman Partnership staff on October 25, 2022 and discussed the
feasibility of applying uniform pedestrian countermeasures at downtown intersections. To provide information on
application and cost, the intersections of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue and Babcock Street/Black Avenue were
selected as examples. At the intersection of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue the following countermeasures were
evaluated: High Visibility Crosswalks, Crosswalk Warning Signs, In-Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign and Curb Extensions.
The intersection of Babcock Street/Black Avenue was used to evaluate the following countermeasures: High Visibility
Pavement Markings, Parking Restriction on Crosswalk Approach (via a curb bulb-out), Nighttime Lighting Levels, and In-
Street Pedestrian Crossing Signs.
Figures 3 and 4 on pages 19 and 20 provide a bird’s eye view and perspective image for the two intersections with
the application of the discussed pedestrian countermeasures. Raised medians were not considered due to drainage
and plowing concerns. Utility work was estimated, and prices are provided based upon recent construction projects
in Bozeman. Table 12 below provides the anticipated crash reduction factor and estimated cost for implementation.
Check marks are present in boxes where these treatments are presently installed.
Table 12: Pedestrian Safety Treatments and Cost on Mendenhall Street and Babcock Street
*At Babcock Street/Black Avenue, a curb extension was built to help restrict parking on the crosswalk approach.
Treatment Babcock Street/
Black Avenue
Mendenhall Street/
Tracy Ave
High Visibility Crosswalk Markings
Cost $18,000
CRF: 40% (ped injury crashes)
Parking Restrictions on Crosswalk Approach Cost: $15,500*
CRF: 30% (ped crashes)
Adequate Nighttime Lighting Levels Cost: $20,000
CRF: 42% (ped crashes)
Crosswalk Warning Signs
Cost: $800
CRF: 25% (ped crashes)
Raised Crosswalks Cost: Not evaluated
CRF: 45% (ped crashes)
Cost: Not evaluated
CRF: 45% (ped crashes)
In-Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Cost: $1,200 each
CRF: Unknown
Cost: $1,200 each
CRF: Unknown
Curb Extension
Cost: $10,800
CRF: Unknown
64
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 19 Figure 3: Application of Pedestrian Countermeasures at Babcock Street/Black Avenue 65
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 20 Figure 4: Application of Pedestrian Countermeasures at Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue66
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 21
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions
The preceding analysis has evaluated the safety and operations for the downtown Bozeman corridors of Babcock
Street, Main Street and Mendenhall Street. An evaluation of Existing Conditions (2022) intersection capacity showed
that at all intersections function at LOS C or better during the AM, noon, and PM peak hours. Pedestrian LOS was
calculated to be LOS B or better at the study area intersections. A signal warrant analysis resulted in no warrants
being met for the study area unsignalized intersections.
Speed data was gathered on six different segments of downtown streets and 85th percentile speeds were observed
to be between 27 and 30 mph. The posted speed limit on downtown roadways is 25 mph.
A crash history analysis found that the historical crash rate was slightly higher than the predicted crash rate at the
intersection of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue. The historical crash rates were lower than the predicted crash rates
at all other study area intersections. There were crash trends including rear-end, right-angle, sideswipe, same
direction, left-turn, same direction, and pedestrian/bicycle collisions in the study area, with the most severe crashes
occurring due to pedestrian and bicycle crashes and right-angle collisions.
FHWA guidance for pedestrian safety countermeasures were discussed and applied to the two example intersections of
Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue and Babcock Street/Black Avenue. Information was provided about the crash reduction
factors for the treatments and the estimated costs of application. It is suggested that these improvements be installed at
other study area intersections for consistency and improved safety.
Recommendations
The following list of recommendations is based on the analysis results from this study and the professional judgment
of the author:
At the intersection of Babcock Street/Black Avenue:
· Install high visibility pavement markings on all approaches and crosswalk warning signs and in-street pedestrian
crossing signs on the eastbound approach.
· Install lighting on the northeast and southwest corners and curb extensions on the Northeast, Northwest, and
Southeast corners to help improve pedestrian safety.
· Continue to evaluate intersection operations for warrants for signalization.
· Coordinate these improvements with the bike boulevard project (through the City’s transportation term
contract) to avoid any design conflicts.
At the intersection of Mendenhall Street/Tracy Avenue:
· Install high visibility pavement markings on all approaches and larger stop signs on Tracy Avenue to call more
attention to the intersection.
67
Downtown Bozeman Safety Study 22
· Install advanced crosswalk warning signs and in-street pedestrian crossing signs on the westbound approach to
improve pedestrian safety.
· Maintain the tree on the southeast corner of the intersection to provide adequate sight distance.
· Install curb extensions on the west side of the intersection to improve pedestrian safety.
Throughout the downtown area:
· Provide adequately sized 15-minute loading/unloading spaces at locations where trucks frequently double park.
· Install sharrows uniformly on downtown streets.
· Restrict parking within 30’ of all crosswalk approaches.
· Consolidate signage in the downtown area.
· Install lighting at intersections for pedestrian safety.
· Install high-visibility pavement marks, crosswalk warning signs, in-street pedestrian signs, curb extensions and
lighting at other study area intersections for consistency and to improve safety.
· Increase the yellow clearance intervals to 3.2 seconds to match the 85th percentile speeds of 30 mph.
· Consideration should be given to continue an ongoing review of metrics.
· All transportation-related improvements shall be designed in accordance with City of Bozeman and/or MDT
standards (where applicable) and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
68
APPENDIX A EXHIBITS -
SIGN INVENTORY
69
EXHIBIT ENORTH025SCALE:1" = 50'5025P:\18098_33_DTN22_002_Babcock_&_Mendenhall_Safety\TRAFFIC\Figures\18098_33_BABCOCK_SIGNS.dwg, MENDENHALL 5TH TO WILLSON, 10/19/2022 2:04:23 PM, rboland, 1:1
70
NORTH025SCALE:1" = 50'5025EXHIBIT FP:\18098_33_DTN22_002_Babcock_&_Mendenhall_Safety\TRAFFIC\Figures\18098_33_BABCOCK_SIGNS.dwg, MENDENHALL WILLSON TO BOZEMAN, 10/19/2022 3:28:32 PM, rboland, 1:1
71
NORTH025SCALE:1" = 50'5025EXHIBIT GP:\18098_33_DTN22_002_Babcock_&_Mendenhall_Safety\TRAFFIC\Figures\18098_33_BABCOCK_SIGNS.dwg, MENDENHALL ROUSE TO WALLACE, 10/19/2022 3:28:34 PM, rboland, 1:1
72
EXHIBIT ANORTH025SCALE:1" = 50'5025P:\18098_33_DTN22_002_Babcock_&_Mendenhall_Safety\TRAFFIC\Figures\18098_33_MENDENHALL_SIGNS.dwg, MENDENHALL 5TH TO WILLSON, 10/19/2022 2:06:56 PM, rboland, 1:1
73
NORTH025SCALE:1" = 50'5025EXHIBIT BP:\18098_33_DTN22_002_Babcock_&_Mendenhall_Safety\TRAFFIC\Figures\18098_33_MENDENHALL_SIGNS.dwg, MENDENHALL WILLSON TO BOZEMAN, 10/19/2022 2:07:00 PM, rboland, 1:1
74
NORTH025SCALE:1" = 50'5025EXHIBIT CP:\18098_33_DTN22_002_Babcock_&_Mendenhall_Safety\TRAFFIC\Figures\18098_33_MENDENHALL_SIGNS.dwg, MENDENHALL ROUSE TO WALLACE, 10/19/2022 2:07:05 PM, rboland, 1:1
75
76
APPENDIX B EXISTING VOLUMES –
VEHICLE AND BIKE/PEDESTRIAN COUNTS (2022)
77
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
8:30 AM 5 3 0 0 8 0 12 2 0 14 0 4 70 6 0 80 102
8:45 AM 4 9 0 0 13 0 7 5 0 12 0 6 63 12 0 81 106
9:00 AM 4 8 0 0 12 0 9 8 0 17 0 3 63 11 0 77 106
9:15 AM 3 3 0 0 6 0 7 10 0 17 0 3 61 5 0 69 92
Grand Total 16 23 0 0 39 0 35 25 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 16 257 34 0 307 406
Medium Truck % 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 5.9 0.0 4.9
Heavy Truck % 25.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3
Total Truck % 25.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 15.4 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.9 0.0 5.2
Total % 3.9 5.7 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 8.6 6.2 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 63.3 8.4 0.0 75.6 100.0
PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.95
RT TH U
16 23 0
16RT257TH34LT0 25 35
U LT TH
57 60
Out In
N Tracy Avenue298Total Entering
406Out 307InN Tracy Avenue
39
In Out
51
W Mendenhall StreetE Mendenhall StreetBozeman/MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N Tracy Avenue E Mendenhall Street
Mendenhall Street
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Westbound
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Mendenhall Street & N Tracy AvenueCounted By:
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
East/West Street:
Southbound
N Tracy Avenue
Northbound
W Mendenhall Street
Eastbound
North/South Street: N Tracy Avenue
NNNNNNNNNN
78
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
11:45 AM 13 6 0 0 19 0 9 13 0 22 0 7 96 20 0 123 164
12:00 PM 9 9 0 0 18 0 21 18 0 39 0 4 94 12 0 110 167
12:15 PM 8 6 0 0 14 0 15 15 0 30 0 6 103 13 0 122 166
12:30 PM 11 9 0 1 21 0 18 12 0 30 0 7 105 20 0 132 183
Grand Total 41 30 0 1 72 0 63 58 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 24 398 65 0 487 680
Medium Truck % 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 8.3 2.3 3.1 0.0 2.7
Heavy Truck % 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Truck % 14.6 3.3 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 8.3 2.3 3.1 0.0 2.7
Total % 6.0 4.4 0.0 0.1 10.6 0.0 9.3 8.5 0.0 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 58.5 9.6 0.0 71.6 100.0
PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93
RT TH U
41 30 1
24RT398TH65LT0 58 63
U LT TH
88
N Tracy Avenue 487InE Mendenhall StreetTotal Entering
680
95 121
Out InW Mendenhall StreetOut497Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Tracy Avenue N Tracy Avenue W Mendenhall Street E Mendenhall Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
N Tracy Avenue
In Out
72
North/South Street: N Tracy Avenue Mendenhall Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: Noon Peak Hour (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown Mendenhall Street & N Tracy Avenue
NNNNN
79
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
4:45 PM 8 10 0 0 18 0 14 12 0 26 0 3 93 9 0 105 149
5:00 PM 8 5 0 0 13 0 6 9 0 15 0 7 136 10 0 153 181
5:15 PM 9 10 0 0 19 0 13 9 0 22 0 7 113 7 0 127 168
5:30 PM 4 5 0 0 9 0 6 7 1 14 0 4 112 9 0 125 148
Grand Total 29 30 0 0 59 0 39 37 1 77 0 0 0 0 0 21 454 35 0 510 646
Medium Truck % 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 1.5 2.9 0.0 1.8
Heavy Truck % 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Truck % 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 1.8 2.9 0.0 2.0
Total % 4.5 4.6 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 6.0 5.7 0.2 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 70.3 5.4 0.0 78.9 100.0
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.88
RT TH U
29 30 0
21RT454TH35LT1 37 39
U LT TH
60
N Tracy Avenue E Mendenhall StreetTotal Entering
646 510In66 77
Out InW Mendenhall StreetOut520Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Tracy Avenue N Tracy Avenue W Mendenhall Street E Mendenhall Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
N Tracy Avenue
In Out
59
North/South Street: N Tracy Avenue Mendenhall Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown Mendenhall Street & N Tracy Avenue
NNNNNNNNNN
80
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
8:30 AM 19 10 0 0 29 0 11 7 0 18 0 3 60 7 0 70 117
8:45 AM 23 9 0 0 32 0 12 8 0 20 0 5 64 7 0 76 128
9:00 AM 13 8 0 0 21 0 10 7 0 17 0 3 63 5 0 71 109
9:15 AM 7 1 0 0 8 0 9 6 0 15 0 2 65 4 0 71 94
Grand Total 62 28 0 0 90 0 42 28 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 13 252 23 0 288 448
Medium Truck % 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 2.4 3.6 0.0 2.9 0.0 7.7 5.2 0.0 0.0 4.9
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Truck % 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 2.4 3.6 0.0 2.9 0.0 7.7 5.2 0.0 0.0 4.9
Total % 13.8 6.3 0.0 0.0 20.1 0.0 9.4 6.3 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 56.3 5.1 0.0 64.3 100.0
PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.88
RT TH U
62 28 0
13RT252TH23LT0 28 42
U LT TH
East/West Street:
Southbound
N Black Avenue
Northbound
E Mendenhall Street
Eastbound
North/South Street: N Black Avenue
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
E Mendenhall Street & N Black AvenueCounted By:
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
E Mendenhall StreetE Mendenhall StreetBozeman/MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N Black Avenue E Mendenhall Street
E Mendenhall Street
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Westbound
InN Black Avenue
90
In Out
55
342Total Entering
448Out 28851 70
Out In
N Black Avenue
NNNNNNNNNN
81
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
11:45 AM 12 14 0 0 26 0 15 15 0 30 0 7 93 15 0 115 171
12:00 PM 14 9 0 0 23 0 14 14 0 28 0 6 86 17 0 109 160
12:15 PM 18 9 0 0 27 0 14 14 0 28 0 3 97 8 0 108 163
12:30 PM 10 7 0 0 17 0 15 15 0 30 0 4 104 11 0 119 166
Grand Total 54 39 0 0 93 0 58 58 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 20 380 51 0 451 660
Medium Truck % 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 0.0 10.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 3.1
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Truck % 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 0.0 10.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 3.1
Total % 8.2 5.9 0.0 0.0 14.1 0.0 8.8 8.8 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 57.6 7.7 0.0 68.3 100.0
PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96
RT TH U
54 39 0
20RT380TH51LT0 58 58
U LT TH
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown E Mendenhall Street & N Black Avenue
North/South Street: N Black Avenue E Mendenhall Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: Noon Peak Hour (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:E Mendenhall StreetOut492Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Black Avenue N Black Avenue E Mendenhall Street E Mendenhall Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
N Black Avenue
In Out
93 78
N Black Avenue 451InE Mendenhall StreetTotal Entering
660
90 116
Out In NNNNN
82
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
4:45 PM 10 6 0 0 16 0 8 8 0 16 0 3 85 9 0 97 129
5:00 PM 10 8 0 0 18 0 11 11 0 22 0 2 122 8 0 132 172
5:15 PM 8 7 0 0 15 0 10 10 0 20 0 2 110 9 0 121 156
5:30 PM 16 9 0 0 25 0 10 10 0 20 0 4 92 11 0 107 152
Grand Total 44 30 0 0 74 0 39 39 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 11 409 37 0 457 609
Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 5.4 0.0 2.4
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 5.4 0.0 2.6
Total % 7.2 4.9 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 6.4 6.4 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 67.2 6.1 0.0 75.0 100.0
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.88
RT TH U
44 30 0
11RT409TH37LT0 39 39
U LT TH
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown E Mendenhall Street & N Black Avenue
North/South Street: N Black Avenue E Mendenhall Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:E Mendenhall StreetOut492Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Black Avenue N Black Avenue E Mendenhall Street E Mendenhall Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
N Black Avenue
In Out
74 50
N Black Avenue E Mendenhall StreetTotal Entering
609 457In67 78
Out In NNNNNNNNNN
83
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0
8:30 AM 4 7 2 1 14 3 5 3 0 11 7 92 7 0 106 7 71 6 0 84 215
8:45 AM 6 11 6 0 23 3 2 5 0 10 7 99 7 1 114 4 73 7 0 84 231
9:00 AM 4 9 5 0 18 8 3 4 0 15 7 79 6 0 92 7 85 3 0 95 220
9:15 AM 4 7 3 0 14 2 4 5 0 11 10 98 4 0 112 4 97 2 0 103 240
Grand Total 18 34 16 1 69 16 14 17 0 47 31 368 24 1 424 22 326 18 0 366 906
Medium Truck %5.6 2.9 6.3 0.0 4.3 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.9
Heavy Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.1
Total Truck %5.6 2.9 6.3 0.0 4.3 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 3.0
Total %2.0 3.8 1.8 0.1 7.6 1.8 1.5 1.9 0.0 5.2 3.4 40.6 2.6 0.1 46.8 2.4 36.0 2.0 0.0 40.4 100.0
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.94
RT TH LT U
18 34 16 1
22RT326TH18LT0UU1LT24TH368RT310 17 14 16
U LT TH RT
83 47
Out In
S Tracy AvenueIn362 Out400Total Entering
906Out 366InN Tracy Avenue
69
In Out
61
W Main StreetE Main Street424Bozeman/MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N Tracy Avenue E Main Street
Main Street
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Main Street & Tracy AvenueCounted By:
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:Tracy Avenue
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Tracy Avenue
Northbound
W Main Street
Eastbound
East/West Street:
NNNNNNNNNN
84
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0
11:45 AM 6 12 14 1 33 4 7 6 1 18 13 103 3 0 119 14 119 5 0 138 308
12:00 PM 7 13 1 1 22 4 9 8 0 21 17 99 9 0 125 12 90 5 0 107 275
12:15 PM 7 7 8 0 22 3 12 10 0 25 9 127 4 0 140 8 118 6 0 132 319
12:30 PM 8 10 14 0 32 2 8 4 0 14 14 119 8 0 141 8 114 6 0 128 315
Grand Total 28 42 37 2 109 13 36 28 1 78 53 448 24 0 525 42 441 22 0 505 1217
Medium Truck %0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.8 3.6 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.6
Heavy Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 4.2 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.4
Total Truck %0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.8 3.6 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.7 4.2 0.0 2.5 4.8 4.1 0.0 0.0 4.0
Total %2.3 3.5 3.0 0.2 9.0 1.1 3.0 2.3 0.1 6.4 4.4 36.8 2.0 0.0 43.1 3.5 36.2 1.8 0.0 41.5 100.0
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
RT TH LT U
28 42 37 2
42RT441TH22LT0UU0LT24TH448RT531 28 36 13
U LT TH RT
S Tracy Avenue 505InE Main StreetTotal Entering
1217
118 78
Out In
N Tracy Avenue
In Out
109 104
W Main StreetOut497Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Tracy Avenue S Tracy Avenue W Main Street E Main Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In525498OutNorth/South Street:Tracy Avenue Main Street
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Main Street & Tracy Avenue
NNNNN
85
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0
4:45 PM 7 9 5 0 21 3 8 8 0 19 8 125 9 0 142 4 92 1 0 97 279
5:00 PM 4 8 7 0 19 4 5 12 0 21 11 104 4 0 119 5 111 6 0 122 281
5:15 PM 7 4 6 0 17 5 8 5 0 18 3 117 8 0 128 3 106 3 0 112 275
5:30 PM 5 7 5 0 17 2 5 6 0 13 7 115 3 0 125 3 102 1 0 106 261
Grand Total 23 28 23 0 74 14 26 31 0 71 29 461 24 0 514 15 411 11 0 437 1096
Medium Truck %0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 1.4 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
Heavy Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5
Total Truck %0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 1.4 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7
Total %2.1 2.6 2.1 0.0 6.8 1.3 2.4 2.8 0.0 6.5 2.6 42.1 2.2 0.0 46.9 1.4 37.5 1.0 0.0 39.9 100.0
PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.98
RT TH LT U
23 28 23 0
15RT411TH11LT0UU0LT24TH461RT290 31 26 14
U LT TH RT
S Tracy Avenue E Main StreetTotal Entering
1096 437In68 71
Out In
N Tracy Avenue
In Out
74 65
W Main StreetOut465Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Tracy Avenue S Tracy Avenue W Main Street E Main Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In514498OutNorth/South Street:Tracy Avenue Main Street
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Main Street & Tracy Avenue
NNNNNNNNNN
86
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0
8:30 AM 4 8 4 0 16 4 4 4 0 12 5 82 8 0 95 5 83 4 0 92 215
8:45 AM 4 9 4 0 17 4 4 4 0 12 4 92 9 1 106 5 79 3 0 87 222
9:00 AM 5 9 5 0 19 5 5 5 0 15 13 81 9 0 103 6 94 3 0 103 240
9:15 AM 5 10 5 0 20 5 5 5 0 15 7 96 11 0 114 7 106 4 0 117 266
Grand Total 18 36 18 0 72 18 18 18 0 54 29 351 37 1 418 23 362 14 0 399 943
Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.3
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0
Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.3
Total % 1.9 3.8 1.9 0.0 7.6 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.0 5.7 3.1 37.2 3.9 0.1 44.3 2.4 38.4 1.5 0.0 42.3 100.0
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.89
RT TH LT U
18 36 18 0
23RT362TH14LT0UU1LT37TH351RT290 18 18 18
U LT TH RT
79 54
Out In
S Black AvenueIn399 Out387Total Entering
943Out 399InN Black Avenue
72
In Out
78
E Main StreetE Main Street418Bozeman/MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N Black Avenue E Main Street
E Main Street
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
E Main Street & Black AvenueCounted By:
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street: Black Avenue
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Black Avenue
Northbound
E Main Street
Eastbound
East/West Street:
NNNNNNNNNN
87
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0
11:45 AM 6 8 8 0 22 3 8 6 0 17 6 103 12 0 121 7 126 3 0 136 296
12:00 PM 5 8 8 0 21 3 8 5 0 16 7 90 11 0 108 7 114 7 0 128 273
12:15 PM 6 10 10 0 26 3 10 6 0 19 3 133 14 0 150 8 131 3 0 142 337
12:30 PM 6 9 9 0 24 3 9 6 0 18 8 119 13 0 140 8 123 3 0 134 316
Grand Total 23 35 35 0 93 12 35 23 0 70 24 445 50 0 519 30 494 16 0 540 1222
Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.9
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.9
Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.8
Total % 1.9 2.9 2.9 0.0 7.6 1.0 2.9 1.9 0.0 5.7 2.0 36.4 4.1 0.0 42.5 2.5 40.4 1.3 0.0 44.2 100.0
PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91
RT TH LT U
23 35 35 0
30RT494TH16LT0UU0LT50TH445RT240 23 35 12
U LT TH RT
S Black Avenue 540InE Main StreetTotal Entering
1222
75 70
Out In
N Black Avenue
In Out
93 115
E Main StreetOut540Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Black Avenue S Black Avenue E Main Street E Main Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In519492OutNorth/South Street: Black Avenue E Main Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: Noon Peak Hour (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown E Main Street & Black Avenue
NNNNN
88
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0
4:45 PM 5 6 6 0 17 3 6 9 0 18 8 110 11 0 129 3 95 3 0 101 265
5:00 PM 5 3 5 0 13 3 6 9 0 18 11 86 10 0 107 4 123 3 0 130 268
5:15 PM 4 5 7 0 16 3 6 9 0 18 6 112 12 0 130 1 106 3 0 110 274
5:30 PM 9 10 10 0 29 3 6 9 0 18 8 95 13 0 116 6 106 2 0 114 277
Grand Total 23 24 28 0 75 12 24 36 0 72 33 403 46 0 482 14 430 11 0 455 1084
Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4
Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4
Total % 2.1 2.2 2.6 0.0 6.9 1.1 2.2 3.3 0.0 6.6 3.0 37.2 4.2 0.0 44.5 1.3 39.7 1.0 0.0 42.0 100.0
PHF 0.65 0.65 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
RT TH LT U
23 24 28 0
14RT430TH11LT0UU0LT46TH403RT330 36 24 12
U LT TH RT
S Black Avenue E Main StreetTotal Entering
1084 455In68 72
Out In
N Black Avenue
In Out
75 84
E Main StreetOut489Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
N Black Avenue S Black Avenue E Main Street E Main Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In482443OutNorth/South Street: Black Avenue E Main Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown E Main Street & Black Avenue
NNNNNNNNNN
89
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
8:30 AM 0 7 11 0 18 5 3 0 0 8 3 86 4 0 93 0 119
8:45 AM 0 6 17 0 23 9 2 0 0 11 3 112 4 0 119 0 153
9:00 AM 0 7 15 0 22 8 5 0 0 13 4 82 4 0 90 0 125
9:15 AM 0 3 17 0 20 6 5 0 0 11 4 72 7 0 83 0 114
Grand Total 0 23 60 0 83 28 15 0 0 43 14 352 19 0 385 0 0 0 0 0 511
Medium Truck %0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0
Heavy Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
Total Truck %0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0
Total %0.0 4.5 11.7 0.0 16.2 5.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 8.4 2.7 68.9 3.7 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83
TH LT U
23 60 0
LT19TH352RT140 15 28
U TH RT
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:S Tracy Avenue
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Tracy Avenue
Northbound
W Babcock Street
Eastbound
East/West Street:
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
W Babcock Street & S Tracy AvenueCounted By:W Babcock StreetW Babcock Street385Bozeman/MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
S Tracy Avenue W Babcock Street
W Babcock Street
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
S Tracy Avenue
83
In Out
34
InOut440Total Entering
511
37 43
Out In
S Tracy Avenue
NNNNNNNNNN
90
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
11:45 AM 0 10 21 0 31 10 8 0 0 18 3 102 6 0 111 0 160
12:00 PM 0 15 21 0 36 10 8 0 0 18 0 116 8 0 124 0 178
12:15 PM 0 13 13 0 26 11 9 0 0 20 3 118 14 0 135 0 181
12:30 PM 0 12 25 0 37 18 9 0 0 27 4 115 3 0 122 0 186
Grand Total 0 50 80 0 130 49 34 0 0 83 10 451 31 0 492 0 0 0 0 0 705
Medium Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.3 3.2 0.0 1.4 0.0
Heavy Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.3 3.2 0.0 1.4 0.0
Total %0.0 7.1 11.3 0.0 18.4 7.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 11.8 1.4 64.0 4.4 0.0 69.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
TH LT U
50 80 0
LT31TH451RT100 34 49
U TH RT
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown W Babcock Street & S Tracy Avenue
North/South Street:S Tracy Avenue W Babcock Street
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:W Babcock StreetVehicle Volumes and Adjustments
S Tracy Avenue S Tracy Avenue W Babcock Street W Babcock Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In492580OutS Tracy Avenue
In Out
130 65
S Tracy Avenue W Babcock StreetTotal Entering
705
60 83
Out In NNNNN
91
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
4:45 PM 0 9 5 0 14 4 6 0 0 10 4 80 12 0 96 0 120
5:00 PM 0 11 20 0 31 3 8 0 0 11 4 103 5 0 112 0 154
5:15 PM 0 7 3 0 10 6 9 0 0 15 4 97 5 0 106 0 131
5:30 PM 0 8 9 0 17 9 8 0 0 17 2 85 3 0 90 0 124
Grand Total 0 35 37 0 72 22 31 0 0 53 14 365 25 0 404 0 0 0 0 0 529
Medium Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0
Heavy Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Total Truck %0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 4.0 0.0 1.5 0.0
Total %0.0 6.6 7.0 0.0 13.6 4.2 5.9 0.0 0.0 10.0 2.6 69.0 4.7 0.0 76.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86
TH LT U
35 37 0
LT25TH365RT140 31 22
U TH RT
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown W Babcock Street & S Tracy Avenue
North/South Street:S Tracy Avenue W Babcock Street
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:W Babcock StreetVehicle Volumes and Adjustments
S Tracy Avenue S Tracy Avenue W Babcock Street W Babcock Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In404424OutS Tracy Avenue
In Out
72 56
S Tracy Avenue W Babcock StreetTotal Entering
529
49 53
Out In NNNNNNNNNN
92
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
8:30 AM 0 8 4 0 12 5 4 0 0 9 6 92 4 0 102 0 123
8:45 AM 0 11 4 0 15 5 5 0 0 10 9 112 6 0 127 0 152
9:00 AM 0 7 4 0 11 15 4 0 0 19 10 77 4 0 91 0 121
9:15 AM 0 8 3 1 12 11 3 0 0 14 5 73 4 0 82 0 108
Grand Total 0 34 15 1 50 36 16 0 0 52 30 354 18 0 402 0 0 0 0 0 504
Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0
Total % 0.0 6.7 3.0 0.2 9.9 7.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 10.3 6.0 70.2 3.6 0.0 79.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83
TH LT U
34 15 1
LT18TH354RT300 16 36
U TH RT
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street: S Black Avenue
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Black Avenue
Northbound
W Babcock Street
Eastbound
East/West Street:
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
W Babcock Street & S Black AvenueCounted By:W Babcock StreetW Babcock Street402Bozeman/MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
S Black Avenue W Babcock Street
W Babcock Street
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
S Black Avenue
50
In Out
35
InOut405Total Entering
504
64 52
Out In
S Black Avenue
NNNNNNNNNN
93
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
11:45 AM 0 9 8 1 18 10 9 0 0 19 15 112 6 0 133 0 170
12:00 PM 0 18 5 0 23 11 9 0 0 20 15 110 6 0 131 0 174
12:15 PM 0 6 7 0 13 7 9 0 0 16 9 120 6 0 135 0 164
12:30 PM 0 12 4 1 17 9 9 0 0 18 18 117 6 0 141 0 176
Grand Total 0 45 24 2 71 37 36 0 0 73 57 459 24 0 540 0 0 0 0 0 684
Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0
Total % 0.0 6.6 3.5 0.3 10.4 5.4 5.3 0.0 0.0 10.7 8.3 67.1 3.5 0.0 78.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
TH LT U
45 24 2
LT24TH459RT570 36 37
U TH RT
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown W Babcock Street & S Black Avenue
North/South Street: S Black Avenue W Babcock Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: Noon Peak Hour (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:W Babcock StreetVehicle Volumes and Adjustments
S Black Avenue S Black Avenue W Babcock Street W Babcock Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In540520OutS Black Avenue
In Out
71 62
S Black Avenue W Babcock StreetTotal Entering
684
102 73
Out In NNNNN
94
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0
4:45 PM 0 10 7 1 18 9 8 0 0 17 5 84 6 0 95 0 130
5:00 PM 0 11 13 0 24 13 11 0 0 24 9 114 8 0 131 0 179
5:15 PM 0 11 6 0 17 8 9 0 0 17 6 98 6 0 110 0 144
5:30 PM 0 18 11 0 29 8 10 0 0 18 6 96 7 0 109 0 156
Grand Total 0 50 37 1 88 38 38 0 0 76 26 392 27 0 445 0 0 0 0 0 609
Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Total % 0.0 8.2 6.1 0.2 14.4 6.2 6.2 0.0 0.0 12.5 4.3 64.4 4.4 0.0 73.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
TH LT U
50 37 1
LT27TH392RT260 38 38
U TH RT
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By: Wyatt Brown W Babcock Street & S Black Avenue
North/South Street: S Black Avenue W Babcock Street
Date Performed: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman/MDT
Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM)
Project Number: 18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:W Babcock StreetVehicle Volumes and Adjustments
S Black Avenue S Black Avenue W Babcock Street W Babcock Street
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In445467OutS Black Avenue
In Out
88 66
S Black Avenue W Babcock StreetTotal Entering
609
76 76
Out In NNNNNNNNNN
95
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8:30 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 2 3 0 5 0 2 7 0 5 0 3 8 21
8:45 AM 1 8 0 1 10 0 3 0 3 6 0 6 0 2 8 0 12 0 3 15 39
9:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 4 7 0 1 0 4 5 0 5 0 4 9 22
9:15 AM 0 2 0 2 4 0 3 0 2 5 0 2 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 9 20
Grand Total 1 10 0 7 18 0 10 0 11 21 0 14 0 8 22 0 31 0 10 41 102
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0 0
11 10
N Tracy Ave
0 14 0 10
0 0
Out In E Mendenhall StTotal Entering
0
In00OutW Mendenhall StOut00In0 0
0 8 0 31
10 7
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
1
N Tracy Ave
0
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Tracy Ave N Tracy Ave W Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
N Tracy Ave E Mendenhall St
Mendenhall St
Bikes in Roadway
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Mendenhall St & Tracy AveCounted By:
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:N Tracy Ave
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
N Tracy Ave
Northbound
W Mendenhall St
Eastbound
East/West Street:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N
96
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
12:15 PM 0 3 0 7 10 0 4 0 14 18 0 3 2 3 8 0 13 0 10 23 59
12:30 PM 0 3 0 7 10 0 11 0 6 17 0 9 0 2 11 0 12 0 10 22 60
12:45 PM 0 18 0 4 22 0 9 0 6 15 0 4 0 7 11 0 13 0 10 23 71
1:00 PM 0 13 1 13 27 0 4 0 6 10 0 6 0 2 8 0 17 0 13 30 75
Grand Total 0 37 1 31 69 0 28 0 32 60 0 22 2 14 38 0 55 0 43 98 265
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0 0
32 28
N Tracy Ave
0 22 0 43
0 0
Out In E Mendenhall StTotal Entering
0
In00OutW Mendenhall StOut00In0 0
2 14 0 55
37 31
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
0
N Tracy Ave
1
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Tracy Ave N Tracy Ave W Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
North/South Street:N Tracy Ave Mendenhall StEast/West Street:
Bikes in Roadway
N Tracy Ave N Tracy Ave W Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (12:15 - 1:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Mendenhall St & Tracy Ave
N
97
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6:30 PM 0 3 0 5 8 0 9 0 19 28 0 5 0 9 14 0 3 0 8 11 61
6:45 PM 0 5 1 2 8 0 11 0 6 17 0 6 0 0 6 0 8 0 6 14 45
7:00 PM 0 8 0 15 23 0 9 0 5 14 0 7 0 5 12 0 4 0 2 6 55
7:15 PM 0 12 0 3 15 0 21 1 15 37 0 3 0 6 9 2 9 0 5 16 77
Grand Total 0 28 1 25 54 0 50 1 45 96 0 21 0 20 41 2 24 0 21 47 238
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0
45
1
28
2 24
1
25
0 0
0 21 Out00 20
W Mendenhall St0 21
0
50
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
N Tracy Ave 0InTotal Entering
0
0 0
Out In
N Tracy Ave
Bikes in Roadway
N Tracy Ave N Tracy Ave W Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In00OutBikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Tracy Ave N Tracy Ave W Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
E Mendenhall StIn Out
North/South Street:N Tracy Ave Mendenhall St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (2:15 - 3:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Mendenhall St & Tracy Ave
N
98
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8:30 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 6 0 2 8 0 6 0 5 11 0 6 1 1 8 30
8:45 AM 1 1 0 1 3 1 9 0 3 13 0 1 0 4 5 0 4 0 4 8 29
9:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 4 11
9:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 5 0 2 1 4 7 0 0 1 1 2 15
Grand Total 1 6 0 1 8 1 20 0 9 30 1 9 1 14 25 0 12 2 8 22 85
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0 1
9 20
N Black Ave
1 9 2 8
0 0
Out In E Mendenhall StTotal Entering
0
In00OutE Mendenhall StOut00In0 0
1 14 0 12
6 1
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
1
N Black Ave
0
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Black Ave N Black Ave E Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
N Black Ave E Mendenhall St
E Mendenhall St
Bikes in Roadway
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Mendenhall St & Black AveCounted By:
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:N Black Ave
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
N Black Ave
Northbound
E Mendenhall St
Eastbound
East/West Street:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N
99
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
12:15 PM 0 0 0 4 4 1 2 0 6 9 0 9 0 9 18 0 5 0 2 7 38
12:30 PM 0 1 0 1 2 0 5 1 3 9 0 7 0 4 11 0 4 1 2 7 29
12:45 PM 0 3 0 1 4 0 9 0 5 14 1 11 0 4 16 0 6 0 1 7 41
1:00 PM 0 6 0 3 9 0 4 0 1 5 0 9 0 1 10 0 4 0 6 10 34
Grand Total 0 10 0 9 19 1 20 1 15 37 1 36 0 18 55 0 19 1 11 31 142
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
1 1
15 20
N Black Ave
1 36 1 11
0 0
Out In E Mendenhall StTotal Entering
0
In00OutE Mendenhall StOut00In0 0
0 18 0 19
10 9
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
0
N Black Ave
0
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Black Ave N Black Ave E Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
North/South Street:N Black Ave E Mendenhall StEast/West Street:
Bikes in Roadway
N Black Ave N Black Ave E Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (12:15 - 1:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Mendenhall St & Black Ave
N
100
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6:30 PM 0 8 0 7 15 0 2 0 2 4 0 4 0 8 12 0 3 0 4 7 38
6:45 PM 0 2 0 6 8 1 9 0 7 17 0 11 0 6 17 1 1 0 2 4 46
7:00 PM 0 12 0 0 12 0 2 0 3 5 0 10 0 2 12 0 0 0 2 2 31
7:15 PM 0 3 0 3 6 0 12 1 5 18 0 5 0 15 20 0 0 0 3 3 47
Grand Total 0 25 0 16 41 1 25 1 17 44 0 30 0 31 61 1 4 0 11 16 162
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0
17
1
25
1 4
0
16
0 0
0 30 Out00 31
E Mendenhall St0 11
1
25
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
N Black Ave 0InTotal Entering
0
0 0
Out In
N Black Ave
Bikes in Roadway
N Black Ave N Black Ave E Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In00OutBikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Black Ave N Black Ave E Mendenhall St E Mendenhall St
E Mendenhall StIn Out
North/South Street:N Black Ave E Mendenhall St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (2:15 - 3:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Mendenhall St & Black Ave
N
101
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8:30 AM 1 4 1 6 12 0 8 0 6 14 0 4 0 1 5 0 4 0 6 10 41
8:45 AM 0 9 0 10 19 0 14 1 6 21 0 5 0 3 8 0 8 0 8 16 64
9:00 AM 1 12 0 12 25 0 19 1 12 32 0 6 0 3 9 0 9 0 3 12 78
9:15 AM 0 10 0 7 17 0 12 0 13 25 0 6 0 4 10 0 6 0 2 8 60
Grand Total 2 35 1 35 73 0 53 2 37 92 0 21 0 11 32 0 27 0 19 46 243
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
2 0
37 53
S Tracy Ave
0 21 0 19
0 0
Out In E Main StTotal Entering
0
In00OutW Main StOut00In0 0
0 11 0 27
35 35
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
2
N Tracy Ave
1
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Main St E Main St
Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
N Tracy Ave E Main St
Main St
Bikes in Roadway
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Main St & Tracy AveCounted By:
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:Tracy Ave
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Tracy Ave
Northbound
W Main St
Eastbound
East/West Street:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N
102
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
12:15 PM 2 48 0 74 124 0 51 0 53 104 0 13 0 13 26 1 29 0 16 46 300
12:30 PM 0 55 0 44 99 0 61 0 54 115 0 8 0 15 23 1 16 0 18 35 272
12:45 PM 0 51 0 57 108 0 66 0 50 116 0 15 0 11 26 0 14 1 39 54 304
1:00 PM 0 72 0 86 158 0 51 0 67 118 0 1 0 19 20 0 22 0 17 39 335
Grand Total 2 226 0 261 489 0 229 0 224 453 0 37 0 58 95 2 81 1 90 174 1211
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0 0
224 229
S Tracy Ave
0 37 1 90
0 0
Out In E Main StTotal Entering
0
In00OutW Main StOut00In0 0
0 58 2 81
226 261
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
2
N Tracy Ave
0
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Main St E Main St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
North/South Street:Tracy Ave Main StEast/West Street:
Bikes in Roadway
N Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Main St E Main St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (12:15 - 1:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Main St & Tracy Ave
N
103
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6:30 PM 0 40 0 32 72 0 5 0 15 20 0 2 0 10 12 0 3 0 10 13 117
6:45 PM 0 37 0 54 91 0 16 0 16 32 0 11 0 1 12 0 9 0 6 15 150
7:00 PM 0 34 0 44 78 0 14 0 13 27 0 7 0 10 17 0 11 0 24 35 157
7:15 PM 0 60 0 34 94 0 16 0 16 32 0 4 0 1 5 0 10 0 8 18 149
Grand Total 0 171 0 164 335 0 51 0 60 111 0 24 0 22 46 0 33 0 48 81 573
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0
60
0
171
0 33
0
164
0 0
0 24 Out00 22
W Main St0 48
0
51
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
S Tracy Ave 0InTotal Entering
0
0 0
Out In
N Tracy Ave
Bikes in Roadway
N Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Main St E Main St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In00OutBikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Main St E Main St
E Main StIn Out
North/South Street:Tracy Ave Main St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (2:15 - 3:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Main St & Tracy Ave
N
104
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8:30 AM 1 12 0 11 24 0 6 0 9 15 0 4 0 10 14 0 0 0 1 1 54
8:45 AM 0 6 0 15 21 1 15 0 7 23 1 7 0 18 26 0 3 0 4 7 77
9:00 AM 1 14 0 24 39 0 7 0 6 13 1 13 2 17 33 0 2 1 3 6 91
9:15 AM 0 15 0 19 34 0 4 0 9 13 0 6 1 13 20 0 0 1 2 3 70
Grand Total 2 47 0 69 118 1 32 0 31 64 2 30 3 58 93 0 5 2 10 17 292
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0 1
31 32
S Black Ave
2 30 2 10
0 0
Out In E Main StTotal Entering
0
In00OutE Main StOut00In0 0
3 58 0 5
47 69
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
2
N Black Ave
0
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Black Ave S Black Ave E Main St E Main St
Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
N Black Ave E Main St
E Main St
Bikes in Roadway
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Main St & Black AveCounted By:
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:Black Ave
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Black Ave
Northbound
E Main St
Eastbound
East/West Street:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N
105
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
12:15 PM 0 63 0 41 104 1 57 0 58 116 0 37 0 37 74 0 17 0 17 34 328
12:30 PM 0 93 0 59 152 0 43 0 47 90 0 47 0 32 79 0 17 0 7 24 345
12:45 PM 0 43 0 65 108 0 71 0 42 113 0 31 0 26 57 0 8 0 6 14 292
1:00 PM 0 59 0 62 121 1 42 0 53 96 0 32 0 38 70 0 6 0 14 20 307
Grand Total 0 258 0 227 485 2 213 0 200 415 0 147 0 133 280 0 48 0 44 92 1272
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0 2
200 213
S Black Ave
0 147 0 44
0 0
Out In E Main StTotal Entering
0
In00OutE Main StOut00In0 0
0 133 0 48
258 227
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
0
N Black Ave
0
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Black Ave S Black Ave E Main St E Main St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
North/South Street:Black Ave E Main StEast/West Street:
Bikes in Roadway
N Black Ave S Black Ave E Main St E Main St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (12:15 - 1:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Main St & Black Ave
N
106
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6:30 PM 0 56 0 43 99 0 10 0 17 27 0 3 0 2 5 0 3 0 14 17 148
6:45 PM 0 48 1 59 108 0 14 0 10 24 0 17 0 5 22 0 2 0 4 6 160
7:00 PM 0 61 0 31 92 0 16 0 13 29 0 11 0 10 21 0 0 0 3 3 145
7:15 PM 0 87 0 44 131 0 11 1 12 24 0 7 0 6 13 0 0 0 0 0 168
Grand Total 0 252 1 177 430 0 51 1 52 104 0 38 0 23 61 0 5 0 21 26 621
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0
52
1
252
0 5
1
177
0 0
0 38 Out00 23
E Main St0 21
0
51
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
S Black Ave 0InTotal Entering
0
0 0
Out In
N Black Ave
Bikes in Roadway
N Black Ave S Black Ave E Main St E Main St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In00OutBikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
N Black Ave S Black Ave E Main St E Main St
E Main StIn Out
North/South Street:Black Ave E Main St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (2:15 - 3:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Main St & Black Ave
N
107
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 4 6
8:45 AM 1 3 1 1 6 0 1 0 2 3 0 3 0 3 6 0 2 0 2 4 19
9:00 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 5 0 4 0 1 5 0 1 0 7 8 21
9:15 AM 0 0 0 4 4 0 2 0 3 5 0 2 0 2 4 0 2 0 8 10 23
Grand Total 1 7 1 5 14 0 5 0 8 13 0 10 0 6 16 0 7 0 19 26 69
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0 0
8 5
S Tracy Ave
0 10 0 19
0 0
Out In E Babcock StTotal Entering
0
In00OutW Babcock StOut00In0 0
0 6 0 7
7 5
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
1
S Tracy Ave
1
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
S Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Babcock St E Babcock St
Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
S Tracy Ave E Babcock St
Babcock St
Bikes in Roadway
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Babcock St & Tracy AveCounted By:
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:S Tracy Ave
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Tracy Ave
Northbound
W Babcock St
Eastbound
East/West Street:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
N
108
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
12:15 PM 0 4 0 4 8 0 1 1 5 7 0 3 0 3 6 0 3 0 4 7 28
12:30 PM 0 5 0 3 8 0 2 0 6 8 0 3 0 11 14 0 2 0 9 11 41
12:45 PM 0 3 0 3 6 0 4 2 2 8 0 5 0 4 9 0 6 0 7 13 36
1:00 PM 0 3 0 2 5 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 7 1 5 13 23
Grand Total 0 15 0 12 27 0 8 4 14 26 0 11 0 20 31 0 18 1 25 44 128
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
4 0
14 8
S Tracy Ave
0 11 1 25
0 0
Out In E Babcock StTotal Entering
0
In00OutW Babcock StOut00In0 0
0 20 0 18
15 12
In Out
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
0
S Tracy Ave
0
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
S Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Babcock St E Babcock St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
North/South Street:S Tracy Ave Babcock StEast/West Street:
Bikes in Roadway
S Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Babcock St E Babcock St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (12:15 - 1:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Babcock St & Tracy Ave
N
109
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 5 5 0 2 0 1 3 12
6:45 PM 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 3 6
7:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 1 4 8
7:15 PM 0 1 0 3 4 2 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 4 1 4 0 3 8 19
Grand Total 0 3 0 5 8 2 2 0 2 6 0 3 0 10 13 1 12 0 5 18 45
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
0
2
0
3
1 12
0
5
0 0
0 3 Out00 10
W Babcock St0 5
2
2
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
S Tracy Ave 0InTotal Entering
0
0 0
Out In
S Tracy Ave
Bikes in Roadway
S Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Babcock St E Babcock St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In00OutBikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
S Tracy Ave S Tracy Ave W Babcock St E Babcock St
E Babcock StIn Out
North/South Street:S Tracy Ave Babcock St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (2:15 - 3:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Babcock St & Tracy Ave
N
110
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 7
8:45 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 1 5 0 1 0 1 2 11
9:00 AM 0 1 0 1 2 0 4 0 2 6 0 2 0 6 8 0 0 0 1 1 17
9:15 AM 1 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 2 11
Grand Total 2 3 0 4 9 1 5 2 2 10 1 8 1 11 21 0 1 0 5 6 46
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
Westbound
Agency/Company:
Wyatt Brown
Sanderson Stewart
North/South Street:S Black Ave
AM Peak Hour (8:30 - 9:30 AM)
18098.33Project Number:
Southbound
S Black Ave
Northbound
E Babcock St
Eastbound
East/West Street:
Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Babcock St & Black AveCounted By:
S Black Ave E Babcock St
E Babcock St
Bikes in Roadway
Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, July 13, 2022Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
S Black Ave S Black Ave E Babcock St E Babcock St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
2
S Black Ave
0
3 4
In Out
0 0
1 11 0 1
E Babcock StOut00InE Babcock StTotal Entering
0
In00Out1 8 0 5
0 0
Out In
2 1
2 5
S Black Ave
N
111
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
12:15 PM 0 2 1 4 7 0 2 0 5 7 0 8 0 8 16 0 3 0 2 5 35
12:30 PM 0 7 0 2 9 0 5 0 9 14 0 8 1 16 25 0 2 0 5 7 55
12:45 PM 0 6 1 7 14 0 4 0 3 7 0 10 0 6 16 0 1 0 2 3 40
1:00 PM 0 5 0 9 14 2 2 0 3 7 0 3 1 9 13 0 1 0 8 9 43
Grand Total 0 20 2 22 44 2 13 0 20 35 0 29 2 39 70 0 7 0 17 24 173
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Babcock St & Black Ave
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:Noon Peak Hour (12:15 - 1:15 PM)
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
North/South Street:S Black Ave E Babcock StEast/West Street:
Bikes in Roadway
S Black Ave S Black Ave E Babcock St E Babcock St
Bikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
S Black Ave S Black Ave E Babcock St E Babcock St
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
0
S Black Ave
2
20 22
In Out
0 0
2 39 0 7
E Babcock StOut00InE Babcock StTotal Entering
0
In00Out0 29 0 17
0 0
Out In
0 2
20 13
S Black Ave
N
112
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Project Description:
Int.
Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Int.
Start Time CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total CW Bike CW Ped CCW Bike CCW Ped Total Total
Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6:30 PM 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 6 6 13
6:45 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 11
7:00 PM 1 1 0 4 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 12
7:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 1 1 8
Grand Total 1 4 0 10 15 0 1 0 4 5 0 3 0 11 14 0 3 0 7 10 44
RT TH LT U
0 0 0 0
0RT0TH0LT0UU0LT0TH0RT00 0 0 0
U LT TH RT
Agency/Company:Sanderson Stewart
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
General Information
Counted By:Wyatt Brown Babcock St & Black Ave
North/South Street:S Black Ave E Babcock St
Date Performed:Wednesday, July 13, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT
Count Time Period:PM Peak Hour (2:15 - 3:15 PM)
Project Number:18098.33 Babcock & Mendenhall Safety
East/West Street:
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
In00OutBikes & Pedestrians in Crosswalk
S Black Ave S Black Ave E Babcock St E Babcock St
E Babcock StIn Out
Bikes in Roadway
S Black Ave S Black Ave E Babcock St E Babcock St
1
Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound
S Black Ave 0InTotal Entering
0
0 0
Out In
S Black Ave
0 7
0
0 11
E Babcock St0 0
0 3 Out00 3
0
10
1
4
0
4
N
113
APPENDIX C CAPACITY CALCULATIONS –
EXISTING (2022)
114
Avg
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
95th %
Queue
(veh)
Avg
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
95th %
Queue
(veh)
Avg
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
95th %
Queue
(veh)
WB 0.9 A 1 1.2 A 1 0.6 A 1
NB 12.5 B 1 23.4 C 2 18.2 C 1
SB 11.8 B 1 15.2 C 1 14.9 B 1
Intersection 3.7 A --6.6 A --4.0 A --
WB 0.7 A 1 0.9 A 1 0.7 A 1
NB 13.0 B 1 17.7 C 2 17.3 C 1
SB 11.1 B 1 13.2 B 1 13.8 B 1
Intersection 4.7 A --5.6 A --4.4 A --
EB 6.2 A 2 8.4 A 4 7.4 A 3
WB 0.4 A 1 0.7 A 2 0.5 A 2
NB 24.3 C 2 25.2 C 3 26.3 C 3
SB 24.7 C 3 25.9 C 4 26.3 C 3
Intersection 6.2 A --7.9 A --7.2 A --
EB 0.6 A 2 0.8 A 2 0.6 A 1
WB 7.2 A 2 7.8 A 4 6.9 A 3
NB 22.7 C 2 26.4 C 3 26.8 C 3
SB 23.0 C 3 27.2 C 4 26.9 C 3
Intersection 6.3 A --7.3 A --6.8 A --
EB 0.5 A 0 0.6 A 1 0.5 A 1
NB 11.5 B 1 13.4 B 1 12.5 B 1
SB 13.5 B 1 17.7 C 2 13.8 B 1
Intersection 3.5 A --5.3 A --3.5 A --
EB 0.4 A 0 0.4 A 0 0.5 A 1
NB 11.4 B 1 13.9 B 1 13.2 B 1
SB 13.6 B 1 16.2 C 1 15.8 C 1
Intersection 2.8 A --3.5 A --4.3 A --
Babcock Street &
Black Avenue
Noon Peak
Intersection Control Two-Way Stop-Control (NB/SB)
Babcock Street &
Tracy Avenue
Intersection Control Two-Way Stop-Control (NB/SB)
Main Street &
Black Avenue
Main Street &
Tracy Avenue
Intersection Control Signalized
Intersection Control Two-Way Stop-Control (NB/SB)
Mendenhall Street &
Black Avenue
Intersection Control Signalized
Mendenhall Street &
Tracy Avenue
Intersection Control Two-Way Stop-Control (NB/SB)
Intersection Approach
Existing (2022)
AM Peak PM Peak
115
Queues
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 451 389 50 73
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.17 0.29 0.41
Control Delay 3.2 2.0 26.1 30.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.2 2.0 26.1 30.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 15 14 24
Queue Length 95th (ft) 48 24 43 59
Internal Link Dist (ft) 362 282 299 282
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2254 2292 435 451
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.17 0.11 0.16
Intersection Summary
116
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 368 31 18 326 22 17 14 16 17 34 18
Future Volume (veh/h) 25 368 31 18 326 22 17 14 16 17 34 18
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.96 0.93 0.98 0.93 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1709 1750 1750 1709 1750 1750 1654 1750 1668 1709 1668
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 391 33 19 347 23 18 15 17 18 36 19
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 6 3 6
Cap, veh/h 134 1760 146 113 1827 119 146 113 100 110 187 84
Arrive On Green 0.64 0.64 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
Sat Flow, veh/h 125 2751 228 94 2855 186 383 538 474 240 889 397
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 235 0 216 203 0 186 50 0 0 73 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1612 0 1493 1631 0 1505 1395 0 0 1526 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.11 0.15 0.09 0.12 0.36 0.34 0.25 0.26
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1085 0 956 1096 0 963 359 0 0 381 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.23 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1085 0 956 1096 0 963 492 0 0 526 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.6 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.2 0.0 0.0 24.5 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.1 0.0 6.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 24.3 0.0 0.0 24.7 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 451 389 50 73
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 0.4 24.3 24.7
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.3 21.7 53.3 21.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 5.3 5.9 * 5.3 5.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 41 23.1 * 41 23.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 4.8 2.0 4.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.0 0.3 2.6 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.2
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
117
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Tracy Ave & Mendenhall St 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 34 257 16 25 35 0 0 23 16
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 34 257 16 25 35 0 0 23 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 21 21 0 18 22 0 41 41 0 22
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 3 0 0 9 25
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 36 271 17 26 37 0 0 24 17
Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 21 0 0 263 399 - - 391 184
Stage 1 - - - 21 21 - - 370 -
Stage 2 - - - 242 378 - - 21 -
Critical Hdwy 4.22 - - 7.5 6.56 - - 6.68 7.4
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 5.68 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.56 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.26 - - 3.5 4.03 - - 4.09 3.55
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1564 - - 674 535 0 0 528 760
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 0 601 -
Stage 2 - - - 746 611 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1533 - - 608 501 - - 494 747
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 608 501 - - 494 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 574 -
Stage 2 - - - 679 584 - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 12.5 11.8
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBL WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 541 1533 - - 574
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.117 0.023 - - 0.072
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 7.4 0.1 - 11.8
HCM Lane LOS B A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0.2
118
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Babcock St & Tracy Ave 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 352 14 0 0 0 0 15 28 60 23 0
Future Vol, veh/h 19 352 14 0 0 0 0 15 28 60 23 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 14 0 13 13 0 14 16 0 26 26 0 16
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Mvmt Flow 23 424 17 0 0 0 0 18 34 72 28 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 14 0 0 - 506 260 307 514 -
Stage 1 - - - - 492 - 14 14 -
Stage 2 - - - - 14 - 293 500 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.54 6.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.52 4 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1617 - - 0 472 745 622 467 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 551 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 691 546 0
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1595 - - - 452 736 560 447 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 452 - 560 447 -
Stage 1 - - - - 534 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 625 529 -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 11.5 13.5
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 604 1595 - - 523
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.014 - - 0.191
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.5 7.3 0.1 - 13.5
HCM Lane LOS B A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.7
119
Queues
12: Black Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 5
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 470 449 60 80
v/c Ratio 0.22 0.19 0.33 0.43
Control Delay 2.4 3.3 26.5 30.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 2.4 3.3 26.5 30.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 25 17 26
Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 47 48 62
Internal Link Dist (ft) 282 376 300 296
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2154 2312 413 424
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.19 0.15 0.19
Intersection Summary
120
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
12: Black Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 38 351 29 14 362 23 18 18 18 18 36 18
Future Volume (veh/h) 38 351 29 14 362 23 18 18 18 18 36 18
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.90 0.88
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1709 1750 1750 1723 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 394 33 16 407 26 20 20 20 20 40 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 185 1577 131 86 1792 112 152 142 115 121 212 91
Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 211 2590 215 57 2941 184 365 592 478 255 884 380
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 241 0 229 236 0 213 60 0 0 80 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1526 0 1489 1672 0 1511 1435 0 0 1519 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.8 2.3 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.18 0.14 0.07 0.12 0.33 0.33 0.25 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 986 0 907 1069 0 920 409 0 0 425 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.00 0.25 0.22 0.00 0.23 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 986 0 907 1069 0 920 464 0 0 484 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.99 0.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.7 22.5 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.0 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.7 7.1 0.0 7.3 22.7 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 470 449 60 80
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.6 7.2 22.7 23.0
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 51.0 24.0 51.0 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 5.3 6.0 * 5.3 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 43 21.0 * 43 21.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 5.0 6.8 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.3 0.3 3.0 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.3
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
121
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Black Ave & Mendenhall St 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 23 252 13 28 42 0 0 28 62
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 23 252 13 28 42 0 0 28 62
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 0 30 30 0 8 25 0 22 22 0 25
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 5 8 4 2 0 0 0 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 286 15 32 48 0 0 32 70
Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 30 0 0 266 391 - - 384 184
Stage 1 - - - 30 30 - - 354 -
Stage 2 - - - 236 361 - - 30 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 7.58 6.54 - - 6.5 6.96
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.58 5.54 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 3.54 4.02 - - 4 3.33
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 - - 660 543 0 0 553 824
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 0 634 -
Stage 2 - - - 740 624 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1550 - - 550 513 - - 522 818
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 550 513 - - 522 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 616 -
Stage 2 - - - 629 607 - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 13 11.1
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBL WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 527 1550 - - 695
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.151 0.017 - - 0.147
HCM Control Delay (s) 13 7.4 0.1 - 11.1
HCM Lane LOS B A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 - - 0.5
122
HCM 6th TWSC
14: Babcock St & Black Ave 09/27/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 354 30 0 0 0 0 16 36 16 34 0
Future Vol, veh/h 18 354 30 0 0 0 0 16 36 16 34 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 10 10 0 9 21 0 6 6 0 21
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 22 427 36 0 0 0 0 19 43 19 41 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 9 0 0 - 508 248 282 526 -
Stage 1 - - - - 499 - 9 9 -
Stage 2 - - - - 9 - 273 517 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1624 - - 0 471 758 654 460 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 547 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 715 537 0
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1610 - - - 454 751 583 443 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 454 - 583 443 -
Stage 1 - - - - 532 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 638 522 -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 11.4 13.6
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 625 1610 - - 480
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.1 0.013 - - 0.126
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 7.3 0.1 - 13.6
HCM Lane LOS B A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.4
123
Queues
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 553 531 83 114
v/c Ratio 0.26 0.25 0.45 0.58
Control Delay 4.2 2.6 35.5 38.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.2 2.6 35.5 38.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 26 35 48
Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 36 74 93
Internal Link Dist (ft) 362 282 299 282
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2092 2101 363 379
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.25 0.23 0.30
Intersection Summary
124
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 24 448 53 22 441 42 29 36 13 39 42 28
Future Volume (veh/h) 24 448 53 22 441 42 29 36 13 39 42 28
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.91 0.82 0.96 0.82 0.86 0.83 0.85 0.83
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1695 1709 1750 1750 1695 1682 1695 1709 1750 1682 1750 1750
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 472 56 23 464 44 31 38 14 41 44 29
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 3 0 0 4 5 4 3 0 5 0 0
Cap, veh/h 97 1624 188 94 1667 155 169 187 60 161 160 90
Arrive On Green 0.61 0.61 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Sat Flow, veh/h 83 2644 307 79 2713 252 435 739 238 409 632 355
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 294 0 259 281 0 250 83 0 0 114 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1615 0 1418 1613 0 1430 1412 0 0 1396 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.8 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.09 0.22 0.08 0.18 0.37 0.17 0.36 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1038 0 872 1037 0 879 417 0 0 412 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.30 0.27 0.00 0.28 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1038 0 872 1037 0 879 441 0 0 436 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.00 0.97 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.6 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.5 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.3 0.0 8.6 0.6 0.0 0.8 25.2 0.0 0.0 25.9 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 553 531 83 114
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.4 0.7 25.2 25.9
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 57.5 27.5 57.5 27.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 5.3 5.9 * 5.3 5.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 51 23.1 * 51 23.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.3 7.2 2.0 5.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.0 0.5 3.8 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.9
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
125
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Tracy Ave & Mendenhall St 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 65 398 24 58 63 0 0 31 41
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 65 398 24 58 63 0 0 31 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 42 0 71 71 0 42 39 0 83 83 0 39
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 2 8 0 3 0 0 3 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 70 428 26 62 68 0 0 33 44
Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 71 0 0 481 707 - - 694 308
Stage 1 - - - 71 71 - - 623 -
Stage 2 - - - 410 636 - - 71 -
Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - 7.5 6.56 - - 6.56 7.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 5.56 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.56 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.23 - - 3.5 4.03 - - 4.03 3.45
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1520 - - 473 357 0 0 363 651
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 0 474 -
Stage 2 - - - 595 468 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1417 - - 357 298 - - 303 625
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 357 298 - - 303 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 425 -
Stage 2 - - - 476 420 - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 23.4 15.2
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBL WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 324 1417 - - 429
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.402 0.049 - - 0.18
HCM Control Delay (s) 23.4 7.7 0.2 - 15.2
HCM Lane LOS C A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 0.2 - - 0.7
126
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Babcock St & Tracy Ave 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 451 10 0 0 0 0 34 49 80 50 0
Future Vol, veh/h 31 451 10 0 0 0 0 34 49 80 50 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 33 0 22 22 0 33 38 0 35 35 0 38
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 33 475 11 0 0 0 0 36 52 84 53 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 33 0 0 - 602 300 390 607 -
Stage 1 - - - - 569 - 33 33 -
Stage 2 - - - - 33 - 357 574 -
Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.56 6.9 7.5 6.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.56 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.23 - - - 4.03 3.3 3.5 4 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 - - 0 410 702 548 414 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 502 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 639 506 0
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1521 - - - 377 687 445 381 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 377 - 445 381 -
Stage 1 - - - - 477 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 530 481 -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 13.4 17.7
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 514 1521 - - 418
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.17 0.021 - - 0.327
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.4 7.4 0.1 - 17.7
HCM Lane LOS B A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.1 - - 1.4
127
Queues
12: Black Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 5
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 570 594 76 101
v/c Ratio 0.28 0.27 0.42 0.55
Control Delay 2.7 4.1 35.3 38.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 2.7 4.1 35.3 38.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 42 32 41
Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 80 68 85
Internal Link Dist (ft) 282 376 300 296
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2012 2228 340 340
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.27 0.22 0.30
Intersection Summary
128
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
12: Black Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 445 24 16 494 30 23 35 12 35 35 23
Future Volume (veh/h) 50 445 24 16 494 30 23 35 12 35 35 23
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.82 0.91 0.82 0.76 0.70 0.74 0.70
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1709 1750 1750 1709 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 489 26 18 543 33 25 38 13 38 38 25
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 195 1631 86 75 1841 110 137 184 55 148 133 73
Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
Sat Flow, veh/h 229 2580 136 47 2912 174 345 785 233 381 566 312
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 285 0 285 314 0 280 76 0 0 101 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1451 0 1495 1655 0 1478 1363 0 0 1259 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 7.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.19 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.33 0.17 0.38 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 967 0 945 1091 0 934 377 0 0 354 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.30 0.29 0.00 0.30 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 967 0 945 1091 0 934 392 0 0 369 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.00 0.97 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 7.1 26.1 0.0 0.0 26.7 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.7 0.0 7.9 26.4 0.0 0.0 27.2 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 570 594 76 101
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.8 7.8 26.4 27.2
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 59.0 26.0 59.0 26.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 5.3 6.0 * 5.3 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 53 21.0 * 53 21.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 7.1 9.3 5.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.3 0.4 4.3 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
129
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Black Ave & Mendenhall St 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 51 380 20 58 58 0 0 39 54
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 51 380 20 58 58 0 0 39 54
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 30 30 0 18 58 0 29 29 0 58
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 3 10 2 2 0 0 0 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 53 396 21 60 60 0 0 41 56
Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 30 0 0 413 571 - - 561 285
Stage 1 - - - 30 30 - - 531 -
Stage 2 - - - 383 541 - - 30 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 7.54 6.54 - - 6.5 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 3.52 4.02 - - 4 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 - - 523 429 0 0 439 712
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 0 529 -
Stage 2 - - - 611 519 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1550 - - 416 391 - - 400 700
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 416 391 - - 400 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 497 -
Stage 2 - - - 493 487 - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 17.7 13.2
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBL WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 403 1550 - - 533
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.3 0.034 - - 0.182
HCM Control Delay (s) 17.7 7.4 0.1 - 13.2
HCM Lane LOS C A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.1 - - 0.7
130
HCM 6th TWSC
14: Babcock St & Black Ave 09/27/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 459 57 0 0 0 0 36 37 26 45 0
Future Vol, veh/h 24 459 57 0 0 0 0 36 37 26 45 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 33 0 34 34 0 33 91 0 18 18 0 91
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 25 473 59 0 0 0 0 37 38 27 46 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 33 0 0 - 620 318 356 649 -
Stage 1 - - - - 587 - 33 33 -
Stage 2 - - - - 33 - 323 616 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1592 - - 0 407 684 580 391 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 500 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 669 485 0
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1542 - - - 373 662 481 358 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 373 - 481 358 -
Stage 1 - - - - 473 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 568 459 -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 13.9 16.2
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 479 1542 - - 395
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.157 0.016 - - 0.185
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.9 7.4 0.1 - 16.2
HCM Lane LOS B A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0.7
131
Queues
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 524 445 73 75
v/c Ratio 0.23 0.19 0.44 0.43
Control Delay 3.3 2.4 37.3 32.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.3 2.4 37.3 32.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 16 30 26
Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 35 68 64
Internal Link Dist (ft) 362 282 299 282
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2286 2404 389 405
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.23 0.19 0.19 0.19
Intersection Summary
132
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 24 461 29 11 411 15 31 26 14 23 28 23
Future Volume (veh/h) 24 461 29 11 411 15 31 26 14 23 28 23
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.92 0.85 0.96 0.85 0.91 0.89 0.90 0.89
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1723 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 1559 1695 1750 1750
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 470 30 11 419 15 32 27 14 23 29 23
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 4 0 0
Cap, veh/h 103 1813 114 67 1959 69 188 148 65 136 159 106
Arrive On Green 0.63 0.63 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
Sat Flow, veh/h 90 2862 180 35 3094 109 543 628 278 343 675 450
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 274 0 250 234 0 211 73 0 0 75 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1636 0 1496 1701 0 1537 1449 0 0 1468 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.44 0.19 0.31 0.31
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1082 0 948 1122 0 973 401 0 0 400 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.26 0.21 0.00 0.22 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1082 0 948 1122 0 973 453 0 0 453 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.8 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.4 0.0 7.5 0.4 0.0 0.5 26.3 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 524 445 73 75
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 0.5 26.3 26.3
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 59.1 25.9 59.1 25.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 5.3 5.9 * 5.3 5.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 51 23.1 * 51 23.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.2 5.2 2.0 5.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.7 0.3 3.0 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.2
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
133
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Tracy Ave & Mendenhall St 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 35 454 21 38 39 0 0 30 29
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 35 454 21 38 39 0 0 30 29
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 29 0 53 53 0 29 31 0 52 52 0 31
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 40 516 24 43 44 0 0 34 33
Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 53 0 0 439 702 - - 690 330
Stage 1 - - - 53 53 - - 637 -
Stage 2 - - - 386 649 - - 53 -
Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - 7.5 6.5 - - 6.5 7.1
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.5 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.23 - - 3.5 4 - - 4 3.4
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1544 - - 506 365 0 0 371 643
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 0 475 -
Stage 2 - - - 614 469 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1466 - - 407 324 - - 329 625
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 407 324 - - 329 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 444 -
Stage 2 - - - 516 438 - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 18.2 14.9
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBL WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 360 1466 - - 429
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.243 0.027 - - 0.156
HCM Control Delay (s) 18.2 7.5 0.1 - 14.9
HCM Lane LOS C A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.1 - - 0.5
134
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Babcock St & Tracy Ave 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 365 14 0 0 0 0 31 22 37 35 0
Future Vol, veh/h 25 365 14 0 0 0 0 31 22 37 35 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 10 10 0 9 25 0 21 21 0 25
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 29 424 16 0 0 0 0 36 26 43 41 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 9 0 0 - 509 251 318 517 -
Stage 1 - - - - 500 - 9 9 -
Stage 2 - - - - 9 - 309 508 -
Critical Hdwy 4.18 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.24 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1595 - - 0 470 755 616 465 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 546 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 682 542 0
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1581 - - - 450 748 544 445 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 450 - 544 445 -
Stage 1 - - - - 527 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 599 524 -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 12.5 13.8
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 539 1581 - - 491
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.114 0.018 - - 0.171
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 7.3 0.1 - 13.8
HCM Lane LOS B A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0.6
135
Queues
12: Black Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 5
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 492 464 73 76
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.19 0.45 0.44
Control Delay 1.8 3.3 38.7 33.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 1.8 3.3 38.7 33.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 28 31 27
Queue Length 95th (ft) 24 54 69 65
Internal Link Dist (ft) 282 376 300 296
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2091 2418 339 346
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.19 0.22 0.22
Intersection Summary
136
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
12: Black Ave & Main St 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 403 33 11 430 14 36 24 12 28 24 23
Future Volume (veh/h) 46 403 33 11 430 14 36 24 12 28 24 23
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.83 0.85 0.83
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1709 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1654 1750 1750
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 411 34 11 439 14 37 24 12 29 24 23
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Cap, veh/h 197 1618 133 66 2005 63 204 122 52 155 121 95
Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
Sat Flow, veh/h 229 2532 208 34 3138 99 616 537 227 425 531 415
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 251 0 241 244 0 220 73 0 0 76 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1496 0 1473 1717 0 1553 1379 0 0 1372 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.19 0.14 0.05 0.06 0.51 0.16 0.38 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1007 0 941 1141 0 993 378 0 0 371 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.26 0.21 0.00 0.22 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1007 0 941 1141 0 993 404 0 0 397 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.98 0.00 0.98 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 6.5 26.5 0.0 0.0 26.6 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.7 0.0 1.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.6 6.9 0.0 7.0 26.8 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 492 464 73 76
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.6 6.9 26.8 26.9
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 59.6 25.4 59.6 25.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 5.3 6.0 * 5.3 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 53 21.0 * 53 21.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 5.4 7.1 5.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.6 0.3 3.1 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
137
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Black Ave & Mendenhall St 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 37 409 11 39 39 0 0 30 44
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 37 409 11 39 39 0 0 30 44
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 30 0 52 52 0 30 29 0 28 28 0 29
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 42 465 13 44 44 0 0 34 50
Major/Minor Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 52 0 0 415 644 - - 638 298
Stage 1 - - - 52 52 - - 586 -
Stage 2 - - - 363 592 - - 52 -
Critical Hdwy 4.2 - - 7.5 6.5 - - 6.5 6.9
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.5 5.5 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.25 - - 3.5 4 - - 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1530 - - 527 394 0 0 397 704
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 0 500 -
Stage 2 - - - 634 497 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1454 - - 417 349 - - 352 684
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 417 349 - - 352 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 467 -
Stage 2 - - - 524 464 - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 17.3 13.8
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 WBL WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 380 1454 - - 495
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.233 0.029 - - 0.17
HCM Control Delay (s) 17.3 7.5 0.1 - 13.8
HCM Lane LOS C A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.1 - - 0.6
138
HCM 6th TWSC
14: Babcock St & Black Ave 09/27/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 392 26 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 50 0
Future Vol, veh/h 27 392 26 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 50 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 15 0 11 11 0 15 32 0 14 14 0 32
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 32 461 31 0 0 0 0 45 45 45 59 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 15 0 0 - 567 271 346 582 -
Stage 1 - - - - 552 - 15 15 -
Stage 2 - - - - 15 - 331 567 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.5 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 4 3.3 3.5 4 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1616 - - 0 436 733 589 427 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 518 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 662 510 0
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1593 - - - 414 725 489 405 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 414 - 489 405 -
Stage 1 - - - - 498 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 550 491 -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 13.2 15.8
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 527 1593 - - 437
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.17 0.02 - - 0.237
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.2 7.3 0.1 - 15.8
HCM Lane LOS B A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.1 - - 0.9
139
HCM 6th Signals-Pedestrians
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 10/03/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Crosswalk Length (ft) 65.0 65.0 40.0 40.0
Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 4 2 2
Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0 0
Type of Control PretimedPretimedPretimedPretimed
Corresponding Signal Phase 4 8 2 6
Effective Walk Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00
Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 16 23 46 36
Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 16 23 46 37
Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0
Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 25 18 17 17
Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 31 22 16 18
Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 3 2 2 2
85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 570.8 595.7 511.2 677.1
Right Corner Quality of Service A A A A
Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 616.5 436.8 193.0 242.9
Crosswalk Circulation Code A A A A
Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 27.3 27.3 27.3 27.3
Pedestrian Compliance Code Fair Fair Fair Fair
Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.36 2.35 1.80 1.80
Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B
140
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
8: Tracy Ave & Mendenhall St 10/03/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 6.9
Level of Service B
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 257
Ped Vol Crossed 22
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.64
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.40
Delay for adq Gap 16.80
Avg Ped Delay (s) 6.95
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 6.9
Level of Service B
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 257
Ped Vol Crossed 41
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.64
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.40
Delay for adq Gap 16.80
Avg Ped Delay (s) 6.95
141
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
9: Babcock St & Tracy Ave 10/03/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 3
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 17.0
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 50
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 352
Ped Vol Crossed 16
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 17.29
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.82
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.57
Delay for adq Gap 34.24
Avg Ped Delay (s) 17.00
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 9.0
Level of Service B
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 36
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 352
Ped Vol Crossed 26
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 13.29
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.73
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.48
Delay for adq Gap 19.22
Avg Ped Delay (s) 9.02
142
HCM 6th Signals-Pedestrians
12: Black Ave & Main St 10/03/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 4
Approach EB WB NB SB
Crosswalk Length (ft) 60.0 60.0 40.0 40.0
Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 4 2 2
Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0 0
Type of Control PretimedPretimedPretimedPretimed
Corresponding Signal Phase 4 8 2 6
Effective Walk Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00
Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 46 8 32 59
Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 47 9 32 59
Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0
Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 38 14 18 18
Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 29 23 18 18
Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 3 2 2 2
85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 447.2 522.8 883.1 328.5
Right Corner Quality of Service A A A A
Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 203.5 1169.1 276.9 149.0
Crosswalk Circulation Code A A A A
Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 27.3 27.3 27.3 27.3
Pedestrian Compliance Code Fair Fair Fair Fair
Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.40 2.36 1.81 1.82
Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B
143
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
13: Black Ave & Mendenhall St 10/03/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 5
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 6.7
Level of Service B
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 252
Ped Vol Crossed 25
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.64
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.40
Delay for adq Gap 16.53
Avg Ped Delay (s) 6.68
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 6.7
Level of Service B
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 252
Ped Vol Crossed 22
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.64
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.40
Delay for adq Gap 16.53
Avg Ped Delay (s) 6.68
144
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
14: Babcock St & Black Ave 10/03/2022
AM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 4:24 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 6
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 10.9
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 354
Ped Vol Crossed 21
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.76
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.51
Delay for adq Gap 22.99
Avg Ped Delay (s) 10.93
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 10.9
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 354
Ped Vol Crossed 6
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.76
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.51
Delay for adq Gap 22.99
Avg Ped Delay (s) 10.93
145
HCM 6th Signals-Pedestrians
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 10/03/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Crosswalk Length (ft) 65.0 65.0 40.0 40.0
Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 4 2 2
Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0 0
Type of Control PretimedPretimedPretimedPretimed
Corresponding Signal Phase 4 8 2 6
Effective Walk Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00
Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 48 73 213 236
Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 49 73 213 235
Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0
Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 24 22 29 39
Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 53 42 13 28
Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 5 4 2 3
85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 119.2 98.0 107.3 108.3
Right Corner Quality of Service A A A A
Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 171.0 115.2 33.7 28.4
Crosswalk Circulation Code A A C C
Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2
Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor
Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.43 2.42 1.86 1.88
Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B
146
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
8: Tracy Ave & Mendenhall St 10/03/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 12.9
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 398
Ped Vol Crossed 39
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.80
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.55
Delay for adq Gap 26.48
Avg Ped Delay (s) 12.93
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 12.9
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 398
Ped Vol Crossed 83
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.80
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.55
Delay for adq Gap 26.48
Avg Ped Delay (s) 12.93
147
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
9: Babcock St & Tracy Ave 10/03/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 3
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 22.3
Level of Service D
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 50
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 451
Ped Vol Crossed 38
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 17.29
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.89
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.66
Delay for adq Gap 50.07
Avg Ped Delay (s) 22.32
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 12.7
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 36
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 451
Ped Vol Crossed 35
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 13.29
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.81
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.56
Delay for adq Gap 25.78
Avg Ped Delay (s) 12.74
148
HCM 6th Signals-Pedestrians
12: Black Ave & Main St 10/03/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 4
Approach EB WB NB SB
Crosswalk Length (ft) 60.0 60.0 40.0 40.0
Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 4 2 2
Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0 0
Type of Control PretimedPretimedPretimedPretimed
Corresponding Signal Phase 4 8 2 6
Effective Walk Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00
Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 127 44 185 251
Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 127 44 185 251
Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0
Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 50 16 23 35
Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 24 30 12 23
Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 2 3 2 2
85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 96.7 103.4 139.0 76.3
Right Corner Quality of Service A A A A
Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 62.8 193.5 39.8 27.2
Crosswalk Circulation Code A A C C
Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2
Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor
Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.49 2.43 1.82 1.87
Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B
149
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
13: Black Ave & Mendenhall St 10/03/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 5
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 12.1
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 380
Ped Vol Crossed 58
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.78
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.53
Delay for adq Gap 24.99
Avg Ped Delay (s) 12.06
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 12.1
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 380
Ped Vol Crossed 29
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.78
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.53
Delay for adq Gap 24.99
Avg Ped Delay (s) 12.06
150
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
14: Babcock St & Black Ave 10/03/2022
Noon Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 11:37 am 09/27/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 6
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 20.7
Level of Service D
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 459
Ped Vol Crossed 91
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.88
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.65
Delay for adq Gap 44.97
Avg Ped Delay (s) 20.74
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 15.7
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 459
Ped Vol Crossed 18
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.84
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.60
Delay for adq Gap 32.21
Avg Ped Delay (s) 15.72
151
HCM 6th Signals-Pedestrians
7: Tracy Ave & Main St 10/03/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Crosswalk Length (ft) 65.0 65.0 40.0 40.0
Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 4 2 2
Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0 0
Type of Control PretimedPretimedPretimedPretimed
Corresponding Signal Phase 4 8 2 6
Effective Walk Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00
Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 19 43 111 161
Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 20 43 111 161
Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0
Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 24 11 31 23
Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 29 15 14 23
Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 3 2 2 2
85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 259.1 158.5 216.6 181.9
Right Corner Quality of Service A A A A
Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 443.5 207.7 66.4 44.9
Crosswalk Circulation Code A A A B
Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2
Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor
Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.41 2.38 1.83 1.82
Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B
152
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
8: Tracy Ave & Mendenhall St 10/03/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 15.6
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 454
Ped Vol Crossed 31
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.84
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.60
Delay for adq Gap 31.70
Avg Ped Delay (s) 15.56
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 15.6
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 454
Ped Vol Crossed 52
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.84
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.60
Delay for adq Gap 31.70
Avg Ped Delay (s) 15.56
153
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
9: Babcock St & Tracy Ave 10/03/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 3
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 18.0
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 50
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 365
Ped Vol Crossed 25
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 17.29
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.83
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.58
Delay for adq Gap 35.99
Avg Ped Delay (s) 18.04
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 9.4
Level of Service B
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 36
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 365
Ped Vol Crossed 21
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 13.29
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.74
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.49
Delay for adq Gap 19.98
Avg Ped Delay (s) 9.41
154
HCM 6th Signals-Pedestrians
12: Black Ave & Main St 10/03/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 4
Approach EB WB NB SB
Crosswalk Length (ft) 60.0 60.0 40.0 40.0
Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 4 2 2
Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0 0
Type of Control PretimedPretimedPretimedPretimed
Corresponding Signal Phase 4 8 2 6
Effective Walk Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00
Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 65 24 84 165
Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 65 25 84 166
Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0
Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 46 11 36 28
Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 33 14 12 23
Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 3 2 2 2
85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 224.5 171.7 315.9 138.0
Right Corner Quality of Service A A A A
Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 123.7 360.4 87.9 43.1
Crosswalk Circulation Code A A A B
Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2
Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor
Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.44 2.37 1.83 1.83
Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B
155
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
13: Black Ave & Mendenhall St 10/03/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 5
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 13.5
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 409
Ped Vol Crossed 29
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.81
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.56
Delay for adq Gap 27.44
Avg Ped Delay (s) 13.50
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 13.5
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 409
Ped Vol Crossed 28
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.81
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.56
Delay for adq Gap 27.44
Avg Ped Delay (s) 13.50
156
HCM 6th Edition TWSC-Pedestrians
14: Babcock St & Black Ave 10/03/2022
PM Peak Bzn Downtown Safety 5:07 pm 09/26/2022 Existing Conditions (2022) Synchro 11 Report
Page 6
Approach
Approach Direction EB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 12.6
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 392
Ped Vol Crossed 32
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.79
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.54
Delay for adq Gap 25.98
Avg Ped Delay (s) 12.63
Approach
Approach Direction WB
Median Present? No
Approach Delay(s) 12.6
Level of Service C
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 40
Lanes Crossed 2
Veh Vol Crossed 392
Ped Vol Crossed 14
Yield Rate(%) 50
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 14.43
Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.79
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.54
Delay for adq Gap 25.98
Avg Ped Delay (s) 12.63
157
APPENDIX D TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS –
EXISTING (2022)
158
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
-- -- -- --
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
-- -- -- --
Yes
No x x x x
Existing Volumes (2022)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
8. Roadway Network
E Mendenhall Street &
N Tracy Avenue
Signals Warranted
1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
3. Peak Hour
4. Pedestrian Volume
5. School Crossing
6. Coordinated Signal System
7. Crash History
9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
E Mendenhall Street &
N Black Avenue
E Babcock Street &
S Tracy Avenue
E Babcock Street &
S Black Avenue
159
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Tracy Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 3 7 0 29 29 7
1:00 3 3 0 21 21 3
2:00 1 0 0 7 7 1
3:00 0 1 0 6 6 1
4:00 1 3 0 8 8 3
5:00 14 8 0 27 27 14
6:00 8 9 0 66 66 9
7:00 40 34 0 182 182 40
8:00 43 40 0 293 293 43
9:00 82 41 0 296 296 82
10:00 103 67 0 318 318 103
11:00 86 77 0 409 409 86
12:00 130 77 0 488 488 130
13:00 89 75 0 444 444 89
14:00 97 71 0 385 385 97
15:00 72 65 0 417 417 72
16:00 76 62 0 422 422 76
17:00 73 56 0 514 514 73
18:00 84 75 0 335 335 84
19:00 64 45 0 259 259 64
20:00 42 29 0 240 240 42
21:00 36 30 0 194 194 36
22:00 23 16 0 122 122 23
23:00 11 8 0 65 65 11
TOTAL 1181 899 0 5547 5547 1189
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns): Hrs
No 0
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
No 0
Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
No 1
No 0
Warrant 1 Satisfied?No
Major Street Total > 600 and Higher Minor Street Total > 150 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 900 and Higher Minor Street Total > 75 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 480 and Higher Minor Street Total > 120 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 720 and Higher Minor Street Total > 60 for 8 hours?
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Project Description:
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
160
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Tracy Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 3 7 0 29 29 7
1:00 3 3 0 21 21 3
2:00 1 0 0 7 7 1
3:00 0 1 0 6 6 1
4:00 1 3 0 8 8 3
5:00 14 8 0 27 27 14
6:00 8 9 0 66 66 9
7:00 40 34 0 182 182 40
8:00 43 40 0 293 293 43
9:00 82 41 0 296 296 82
10:00 103 67 0 318 318 103
11:00 86 77 0 409 409 86
12:00 130 77 0 488 488 130
13:00 89 75 0 444 444 89
14:00 97 71 0 385 385 97
15:00 72 65 0 417 417 72
16:00 76 62 0 422 422 76
17:00 73 56 0 514 514 73
18:00 84 75 0 335 335 84
19:00 64 45 0 259 259 64
20:00 42 29 0 240 240 42
21:00 36 30 0 194 194 36
22:00 23 16 0 122 122 23
23:00 11 8 0 65 65 11
TOTAL 1181 899 0 5547 5547 1189
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of 4 hours (100% thresholds)?No (0 hrs)
Warrant 2 Satisfied?No
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Project Description:
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
161
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Tracy Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Category A:Peak Period: AM
Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 4 veh-hrs?No (0.61)
High minor approach volume > 100 for peak hour?Yes (121)
Total entering volume > 800 for peak hour?No (608)
Category A warrant satisfied?No
Category B:
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (100% thresholds)?No
Warrant 3 Satisfied?No
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
AM Peak Hour 8:30 - 9:30 AM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.21
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 307
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 60
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 367
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 121
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 608
PM Peak Hour 4:45 - 5:45 PM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.61
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 487
162
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Tracy Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2042)
This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians
experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.
Hour
Begin
0:00 43 0
1:00 31 0
2:00 10 0
3:00 9 0
4:00 12 0
5:00 40 4
6:00 98 16
7:00 270 30
8:00 435 53
9:00 440 61
10:00 473 67
11:00 608 110
12:00 725 187
13:00 660 214
14:00 572 160
15:00 620 135
16:00 627 100
17:00 764 108
18:00 498 158
19:00 385 227 For each of any 4 hours of an average day, do the plotted points representing
20:00 357 207 representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding
21:00 288 199 pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in
22:00 181 28 Figure 4C-5?No
23:00 97 0
TOTAL 8,243 2064 For 1 hour of an average day, does the plotted point representing vehicles per
hour on the major street and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing
the major street fall above the curve in Figure 4C-7?No
Warrant 4 Satisfied?No
Pedestrian Volume
Crossing Major Street
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Major Street
Total Traffic
163
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Tracy Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school
students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall
not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less
than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.
Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing
period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period?N/A
Do 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour?N/A
Warrant 5 Satisfied?N/A
Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of
platooning and/or progressive operation?No
Warrant 6 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to
consider installing a traffic control signal
Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency?N/A
Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month
period?No
Is Condition A criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No
Is Condition B criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No
Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4?
No
Warrant 7 Satisfied?No
Jurisdiction:
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 5: School Crossing
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper
platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system.
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
164
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Tracy Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal could be justified in order to
encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network
Do two or more of the intersecting routes at this location have at least one of the following
characteristics:
A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway
network for through traffic flow; or
B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or
C. It appears as a major route on an official plan.
No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of a least
1000 vehicles during a weekday typical peak hour and have a 5-year projected traffic volume that
meets one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday?No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of at least
1000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday?N/A
Warrant 8 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal
warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled
by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal.
Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign whereby the
center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop or yield line?
No
During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the
plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles
per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track fall above the applicable curve in
Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 (whichever is applicable) for the existing combination of approach lanes
over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance?N/A
Warrant 9 Satisfied?N/A
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Jurisdiction:
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
165
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 5 6 0 20 20 6
1:00 3 2 0 15 15 3
2:00 1 0 0 6 6 1
3:00 0 1 0 5 5 1
4:00 1 6 0 5 5 6
5:00 6 7 0 24 24 7
6:00 15 19 0 63 63 19
7:00 36 37 0 172 172 37
8:00 68 94 0 268 268 94
9:00 64 57 0 287 287 64
10:00 86 71 0 307 307 86
11:00 104 69 0 421 421 104
12:00 114 91 0 450 450 114
13:00 102 76 0 390 390 102
14:00 90 50 0 359 359 90
15:00 96 63 0 383 383 96
16:00 66 69 0 372 372 69
17:00 78 74 0 454 454 78
18:00 62 97 0 309 309 97
19:00 42 64 0 213 213 64
20:00 34 37 0 182 182 37
21:00 28 27 0 143 143 28
22:00 20 23 0 99 99 23
23:00 10 5 0 60 60 10
TOTAL 1131 1045 0 5007 5007 1236
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns): Hrs
No 0
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
No 0.
Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
No 0
No 0
Warrant 1 Satisfied?No
Major Street Total > 600 and Higher Minor Street Total > 150 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 900 and Higher Minor Street Total > 75 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 480 and Higher Minor Street Total > 120 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 720 and Higher Minor Street Total > 60 for 8 hours?
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Project Description:
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
166
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 5 6 0 20 20 6
1:00 3 2 0 15 15 3
2:00 1 0 0 6 6 1
3:00 0 1 0 5 5 1
4:00 1 6 0 5 5 6
5:00 6 7 0 24 24 7
6:00 15 19 0 63 63 19
7:00 36 37 0 172 172 37
8:00 68 94 0 268 268 94
9:00 64 57 0 287 287 64
10:00 86 71 0 307 307 86
11:00 104 69 0 421 421 104
12:00 114 91 0 450 450 114
13:00 102 76 0 390 390 102
14:00 90 50 0 359 359 90
15:00 96 63 0 383 383 96
16:00 66 69 0 372 372 69
17:00 78 74 0 454 454 78
18:00 62 97 0 309 309 97
19:00 42 64 0 213 213 64
20:00 34 37 0 182 182 37
21:00 28 27 0 143 143 28
22:00 20 23 0 99 99 23
23:00 10 5 0 60 60 10
TOTAL 1131 1045 0 5007 5007 1236
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of 4 hours (100% thresholds)?No (0 hrs)
Warrant 2 Satisfied?No
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Project Description:
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
167
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Category A:Peak Period: AM
Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 4 veh-hrs?No (0.37)
High minor approach volume > 100 for peak hour?No (78)
Total entering volume > 800 for peak hour?No (535)
Category A warrant satisfied?No
Category B:
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (100% thresholds)?No
Warrant 3 Satisfied?No
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
AM Peak Hour 8:30 - 9:30 AM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.33
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 288
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 90
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 378
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 78
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 535
PM Peak Hour 4:45 - 5:45 PM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.37
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 457
168
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2042)
This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians
experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.
Hour
Begin
0:00 30 0
1:00 22 0
2:00 9 0
3:00 7 0
4:00 7 0
5:00 36 12
6:00 94 12
7:00 256 45
8:00 398 61
9:00 426 40
10:00 456 52
11:00 626 76
12:00 669 73
13:00 580 98
14:00 533 97
15:00 569 103
16:00 553 89
17:00 675 113
18:00 459 106
19:00 317 101 For each of any 4 hours of an average day, do the plotted points representing
20:00 270 175 representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding
21:00 212 128 pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in
22:00 147 97 Figure 4C-5?No
23:00 89 0
TOTAL 7,440 1478 For 1 hour of an average day, does the plotted point representing vehicles per
hour on the major street and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing
the major street fall above the curve in Figure 4C-7?No
Warrant 4 Satisfied?No
Pedestrian Volume
Crossing Major Street
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Major Street
Total Traffic
169
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school
students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall
not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less
than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.
Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing
period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period?N/A
Do 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour?N/A
Warrant 5 Satisfied?N/A
Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of
platooning and/or progressive operation?No
Warrant 6 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to
consider installing a traffic control signal
Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency?N/A
Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month
period?No
Is Condition A criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No
Is Condition B criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No
Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4?
No
Warrant 7 Satisfied?No
Jurisdiction:
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 5: School Crossing
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper
platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system.
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
170
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Mendenhall Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal could be justified in order to
encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network
Do two or more of the intersecting routes at this location have at least one of the following
characteristics:
A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway
network for through traffic flow; or
B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or
C. It appears as a major route on an official plan.
No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of a least
1000 vehicles during a weekday typical peak hour and have a 5-year projected traffic volume that
meets one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday?No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of at least
1000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday?N/A
Warrant 8 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal
warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled
by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal.
Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign whereby the
center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop or yield line?
No
During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the
plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles
per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track fall above the applicable curve in
Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 (whichever is applicable) for the existing combination of approach lanes
over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance?N/A
Warrant 9 Satisfied?N/A
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Jurisdiction:
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
171
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 2 0 8 0 8 2
1:00 0 3 8 0 8 3
2:00 2 0 3 0 3 2
3:00 0 1 3 0 3 1
4:00 1 1 8 0 8 1
5:00 7 5 46 0 46 7
6:00 13 24 90 0 90 24
7:00 23 35 269 0 269 35
8:00 31 76 383 0 383 76
9:00 58 91 352 0 352 91
10:00 61 117 358 0 358 117
11:00 84 124 430 0 430 124
12:00 93 127 502 0 502 127
13:00 78 107 433 0 433 107
14:00 67 97 378 0 378 97
15:00 76 84 393 0 393 84
16:00 68 56 371 0 371 68
17:00 52 71 402 0 402 71
18:00 33 60 289 0 289 60
19:00 23 33 194 0 194 33
20:00 16 28 128 0 128 28
21:00 11 19 75 0 75 19
22:00 4 7 44 0 44 7
23:00 6 10 19 0 19 10
TOTAL 809 1176 5186 0 5186 1194
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns): Hrs
No 0
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
No 0
Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
No 1
No 0
Warrant 1 Satisfied?No
Project Description:
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street Total > 600 and Higher Minor Street Total > 150 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 900 and Higher Minor Street Total > 75 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 480 and Higher Minor Street Total > 120 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 720 and Higher Minor Street Total > 60 for 8 hours?
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
172
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 2 0 8 0 8 2
1:00 0 3 8 0 8 3
2:00 2 0 3 0 3 2
3:00 0 1 3 0 3 1
4:00 1 1 8 0 8 1
5:00 7 5 46 0 46 7
6:00 13 24 90 0 90 24
7:00 23 35 269 0 269 35
8:00 31 76 383 0 383 76
9:00 58 91 352 0 352 91
10:00 61 117 358 0 358 117
11:00 84 124 430 0 430 124
12:00 93 127 502 0 502 127
13:00 78 107 433 0 433 107
14:00 67 97 378 0 378 97
15:00 76 84 393 0 393 84
16:00 68 56 371 0 371 68
17:00 52 71 402 0 402 71
18:00 33 60 289 0 289 60
19:00 23 33 194 0 194 33
20:00 16 28 128 0 128 28
21:00 11 19 75 0 75 19
22:00 4 7 44 0 44 7
23:00 6 10 19 0 19 10
TOTAL 809 1176 5186 0 5186 1194
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of 4 hours (100% thresholds)?No (0 hrs)
Warrant 2 Satisfied?No
Project Description:
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
173
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Category A:Peak Period: AM
Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 4 veh-hrs?No (0.31)
High minor approach volume > 100 for peak hour?No (72)
Total entering volume > 800 for peak hour?No (476)
Category A warrant satisfied?No
Category B:
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (100% thresholds)?No
Warrant 3 Satisfied?No
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 72
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 476
PM Peak Hour 4:45 - 5:45 PM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.28
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 404
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 385
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 83
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 468
AM Peak Hour 8:30 - 9:30 AM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.31
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
174
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2042)
This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians
experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.
Hour
Begin
0:00 12 0
1:00 12 0
2:00 4 0
3:00 4 0
4:00 12 0
5:00 68 4
6:00 134 15
7:00 400 24
8:00 569 33
9:00 523 85
10:00 532 76
11:00 639 92
12:00 746 120
13:00 643 86
14:00 562 85
15:00 584 73
16:00 551 59
17:00 597 61
18:00 429 45
19:00 288 36 For each of any 4 hours of an average day, do the plotted points representing
20:00 190 24 representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding
21:00 111 6 pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in
22:00 65 6 Figure 4C-5?No
23:00 28 0
TOTAL 7,703 930 For 1 hour of an average day, does the plotted point representing vehicles per
hour on the major street and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing
the major street fall above the curve in Figure 4C-7?No
Warrant 4 Satisfied?No
Pedestrian Volume
Crossing Major Street
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Major Street
Total Traffic
175
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school
students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall
not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less
than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.
Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing
period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period?N/A
Do 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour?N/A
Warrant 5 Satisfied?N/A
Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of
platooning and/or progressive operation?No
Warrant 6 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to
consider installing a traffic control signal
Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency?N/A
Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month
period?No
Is Condition A criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No
Is Condition B criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No
Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4?
No
Warrant 7 Satisfied?No
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 5: School Crossing
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper
platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system.
176
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal could be justified in order to
encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network
Do two or more of the intersecting routes at this location have at least one of the following
characteristics:
A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway
network for through traffic flow; or
B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or
C. It appears as a major route on an official plan.
No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of a least
1000 vehicles during a weekday typical peak hour and have a 5-year projected traffic volume that
meets one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday?No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of at least
1000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday?N/A
Warrant 8 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal
warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled
by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal.
Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign whereby the
center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop or yield line?
No
During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the
plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles
per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track fall above the applicable curve in
Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 (whichever is applicable) for the existing combination of approach lanes
over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance?N/A
Warrant 9 Satisfied?N/A
Jurisdiction:
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
177
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 2 9 0 9 2
1:00 0 2 8 0 8 2
2:00 0 1 3 0 3 1
3:00 0 0 3 0 3 0
4:00 0 0 5 0 5 0
5:00 3 2 54 0 54 3
6:00 13 11 105 0 105 13
7:00 22 20 278 0 278 22
8:00 34 36 405 0 405 36
9:00 54 36 369 0 369 54
10:00 58 72 409 0 409 72
11:00 56 70 507 0 507 70
12:00 74 63 553 0 553 74
13:00 70 74 475 0 475 74
14:00 59 71 410 0 410 71
15:00 53 54 449 0 449 54
16:00 60 62 408 0 408 62
17:00 70 86 447 0 447 86
18:00 44 43 298 0 298 44
19:00 23 41 210 0 210 41
20:00 10 20 128 0 128 20
21:00 10 16 80 0 80 16
22:00 7 8 45 0 45 8
23:00 3 6 19 0 19 6
TOTAL 723 796 5677 0 5677 831
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns): Hrs
No 0
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
No 0
Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
No 0
No 0
Warrant 1 Satisfied?No
Major Street Total > 600 and Higher Minor Street Total > 150 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 900 and Higher Minor Street Total > 75 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 480 and Higher Minor Street Total > 120 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 720 and Higher Minor Street Total > 60 for 8 hours?
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Project Description:
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
178
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Hour
Begin NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 2 9 0 9 2
1:00 0 2 8 0 8 2
2:00 0 1 3 0 3 1
3:00 0 0 3 0 3 0
4:00 0 0 5 0 5 0
5:00 3 2 54 0 54 3
6:00 13 11 105 0 105 13
7:00 22 20 278 0 278 22
8:00 34 36 405 0 405 36
9:00 54 36 369 0 369 54
10:00 58 72 409 0 409 72
11:00 56 70 507 0 507 70
12:00 74 63 553 0 553 74
13:00 70 74 475 0 475 74
14:00 59 71 410 0 410 71
15:00 53 54 449 0 449 54
16:00 60 62 408 0 408 62
17:00 70 86 447 0 447 86
18:00 44 43 298 0 298 44
19:00 23 41 210 0 210 41
20:00 10 20 128 0 128 20
21:00 10 16 80 0 80 16
22:00 7 8 45 0 45 8
23:00 3 6 19 0 19 6
TOTAL 723 796 5677 0 5677 831
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns):
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of 4 hours (100% thresholds)?No (0 hrs)
Warrant 2 Satisfied?No
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Project Description:
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
179
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
Category A:Peak Period: AM
Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 4 veh-hrs?No (0.39)
High minor approach volume > 100 for peak hour?No (88)
Total entering volume > 800 for peak hour?No (533)
Category A warrant satisfied?No
Category B:
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns):
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (100% thresholds)?No
Warrant 3 Satisfied?No
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
AM Peak Hour 8:30 - 9:30 AM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.20
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 402
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 52
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 454
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 88
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 533
PM Peak Hour 4:45 - 5:45 PM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.39
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 445
180
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2042)
This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians
experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.
Hour
Begin
0:00 13 0
1:00 12 0
2:00 4 0
3:00 4 0
4:00 7 0
5:00 80 7
6:00 156 3
7:00 413 15
8:00 602 31
9:00 548 55
10:00 608 71
11:00 753 94
12:00 822 153
13:00 706 120
14:00 609 106
15:00 667 103
16:00 606 59
17:00 664 64
18:00 443 24
19:00 312 37 For each of any 4 hours of an average day, do the plotted points representing
20:00 190 40 representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding
21:00 119 12 pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in
22:00 67 9 Figure 4C-5?No
23:00 28 0
ition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns):8,433 1003 For 1 hour of an average day, does the plotted point representing vehicles per
hour on the major street and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing
the major street fall above the curve in Figure 4C-7?NoCondition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
Warrant 4 Satisfied?No
Pedestrian Volume
Crossing Major Street
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Major Street
Total Traffic
181
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school
students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall
not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less
than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.
Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing
period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period?N/A
Do 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour?N/A
Warrant 5 Satisfied?N/A
Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of
platooning and/or progressive operation?No
Warrant 6 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to
consider installing a traffic control signal
Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency?N/A
Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month
period?No
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns):No
Is Condition B criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No
Interruption
Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4?
NoCombination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
Warrant 7 Satisfied?No
Jurisdiction:
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 5: School Crossing
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper
platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system.
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
182
Sanderson Stewart
9/27/2022
18098.33
Babcock and Mendenhall Safety Improvements
City of Bozeman/MDT
25 mph
Babcock Street (2 lane)
Black Avenue (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022)
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal could be justified in order to
encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network
Do two or more of the intersecting routes at this location have at least one of the following
characteristics:
A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway
network for through traffic flow; or
B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or
C. It appears as a major route on an official plan.
No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of a least
1000 vehicles during a weekday typical peak hour and have a 5-year projected traffic volume that
meets one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday?No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of at least
1000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday?N/A
Warrant 8 Satisfied?No
This warrant is intended for application where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal
warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled
by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal.
Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign whereby the
center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop or yield line?
No
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns):
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns):
Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns):
During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the
plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles
per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track fall above the applicable curve in
Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 (whichever is applicable) for the existing combination of approach lanes
over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance?N/A
Warrant 9 Satisfied?N/A
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Jurisdiction:
General Information
Agency/Company:
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
183
APPENDIX E SPEED DATA –
EXISTING (2022)
184
Mendenhall -
3rd & Grand
Mendenhall -
Bozeman & Rouse
Babcock -
Black & Bozeman
Babcock -
3rd & Grand
Date 7/11-13/2022 7/13-15/2022 7/13-15/2022 7/11-13/2022
Direction of Vehicles Westbound Westbound Eastbound Eastbound
ADT (veh)5,148 4,355 5,774 4,497
85th Percentile Speed (mph)30 27 28 30
Max speed (mph)49 55 49 48
50th Percentile Speed (mph)26 23 24 26
185
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT
For Project: Mendenhall 3rd and Grand
Projects Notes/Address:
Location/Name: Merged
Report Generated: 1/19/2023 10:27:33 AM
Speed Intervals = 1 MPH
Time Intervals = Instant
Traffic Report From 7/11/2022 01:00:00 PM through 7/13/2022 01:59:59 PM
85th Percentile Speed = 30.0 MPH
85th Percentile Vehicles = 8,934 counts
Max Speed = 79.0 MPH on 7/13/2022 9:59:33 AM
Total Vehicles =10,511 counts
AADT: 5148.3
Volumes - weekly vehicle counts
Time 5 Day 7 Day
Average Daily 3,503 3,503
AM Peak 11:00 to 12:00 386 386
PM Peak 05:00 to 06:00 422 422
Speed
Speed Limit: 25 MPH
85th Percentile Speed: 30.0 MPH
50th Percentile Speed: 26.0 MPH
10 MPH Pace Interval: 20.0 MPH to 30.0 MPH
Average Speed: 25.4 MPH
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Count over limit 1675 2569 1065 N/A N/A N/A N/A
% over limit 54.0 49.6 47.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Avg Speeder 28.8 28.8 29.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 41 0.4
VEH_MED 10208 97.1
VEH_LG 262 2.5
[ VEH_SM = motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck ]
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by hour:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl counts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/11/2022 02:00:00 PM 28.0 115 135 37 28.2 37.0%
7/11/2022 03:00:00 PM 28.0 342 402 37 28.4 41.8%
7/11/2022 04:00:00 PM 29.0 371 436 36 28.4 43.1%
7/11/2022 05:00:00 PM 30.0 346 407 40 28.7 55.3%
7/11/2022 06:00:00 PM 30.0 402 473 39 28.9 65.1%
7/11/2022 07:00:00 PM 30.0 278 327 43 28.9 60.9%
7/11/2022 08:00:00 PM 29.0 246 289 37 28.4 51.9%
7/11/2022 09:00:00 PM 32.0 188 221 44 30.1 60.2%
7/11/2022 10:00:00 PM 30.0 179 211 37 28.9 60.2%
7/11/2022 11:00:00 PM 31.0 108 127 39 29.4 64.6%
7/12/2022 12:00:00 AM 31.0 65 76 35 29.5 59.2%
7/12/2022 01:00:00 AM 32.0 26 31 37 30.1 71.0%
7/12/2022 02:00:00 AM 31.0 19 22 42 29.8 68.2%
7/12/2022 03:00:00 AM 33.0 6 7 33 30.0 100.0%
7/12/2022 04:00:00 AM 28.0 4 5 32 29.3 60.0%
7/12/2022 05:00:00 AM 29.0 7 8 39 29.4 87.5%
7/12/2022 06:00:00 AM 32.0 29 34 44 29.9 76.5%
7/12/2022 07:00:00 AM 32.0 59 69 39 29.6 69.6%
7/12/2022 08:00:00 AM 30.0 150 177 43 29.3 70.1%
7/12/2022 09:00:00 AM 30.0 206 242 46 28.8 57.4%
7/12/2022 10:00:00 AM 29.0 228 268 55 28.9 42.9%
7/12/2022 11:00:00 AM 28.0 253 298 51 28.9 37.9%
7/12/2022 12:00:00 PM 27.0 298 351 40 28.1 34.2%
7/12/2022 01:00:00 PM 28.0 329 387 56 28.5 33.9%
7/12/2022 02:00:00 PM 29.0 314 369 41 28.5 38.5%
7/12/2022 03:00:00 PM 28.0 304 358 59 29.0 42.7%
7/12/2022 04:00:00 PM 29.0 314 369 59 28.7 42.0%
7/12/2022 05:00:00 PM 29.0 320 376 47 28.6 45.2%
7/12/2022 06:00:00 PM 30.0 316 372 38 28.5 61.6%
7/12/2022 07:00:00 PM 30.0 300 353 42 28.7 65.2%
7/12/2022 08:00:00 PM 30.0 257 302 41 28.8 53.0%
7/12/2022 09:00:00 PM 29.0 267 314 44 28.7 58.0%
7/12/2022 10:00:00 PM 31.0 200 235 40 29.1 56.2%
7/12/2022 11:00:00 PM 30.0 129 152 40 28.8 65.8%
7/13/2022 12:00:00 AM 30.0 66 78 40 29.1 60.3%
7/13/2022 01:00:00 AM 31.0 29 34 36 29.6 76.5%
7/13/2022 02:00:00 AM 30.0 15 18 40 29.7 61.1%
7/13/2022 03:00:00 AM 30.0 8 9 31 29.4 77.8%
7/13/2022 04:00:00 AM 32.0 5 6 40 32.4 83.3%
7/13/2022 05:00:00 AM 28.0 8 10 30 28.2 60.0%
7/13/2022 06:00:00 AM 31.0 20 24 36 29.8 58.3%
7/13/2022 07:00:00 AM 33.0 60 70 38 30.1 67.1%
7/13/2022 08:00:00 AM 32.0 142 167 72 30.1 71.9%
7/13/2022 09:00:00 AM 30.0 184 217 49 28.9 59.9%
7/13/2022 10:00:00 AM 29.0 212 250 79 30.6 44.4%
7/13/2022 11:00:00 AM 29.0 248 292 66 29.3 45.9%
7/13/2022 12:00:00 PM 29.0 359 422 74 29.8 42.9%
7/13/2022 01:00:00 PM 29.0 369 434 62 29.4 40.8%
7/13/2022 02:00:00 PM 29.0 237 279 70 30.2 34.8%
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by day:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl cnts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/12/2022 12:00:00 AM 30.0 2638 3104 44 28.8 54.0%
7/13/2022 12:00:00 AM 29.0 4400 5176 59 28.8 49.6%
7/13/2022 01:59:59 PM 30.0 1896 2231 79 29.7 47.7%
186
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT
For Project: Mendenhall Bozeman and Rouse
Projects Notes/Address:
Location/Name: Merged
Report Generated: 1/19/2023 10:31:11 AM
Speed Intervals = 1 MPH
Time Intervals = Instant
Traffic Report From 7/13/2022 02:00:00 PM through 7/15/2022 02:59:59 PM
85th Percentile Speed = 27.0 MPH
85th Percentile Vehicles = 7,559 counts
Max Speed = 55.0 MPH on 7/13/2022 9:04:08 PM
Total Vehicles =8,893 counts
AADT: 4355.8
Volumes - weekly vehicle counts
Time 5 Day 7 Day
Average Daily 2,964 2,964
AM Peak 11:00 to 12:00 308 308
PM Peak 05:00 to 06:00 451 451
Speed
Speed Limit: 25 MPH
85th Percentile Speed: 27.0 MPH
50th Percentile Speed: 23.0 MPH
10 MPH Pace Interval: 18.0 MPH to 28.0 MPH
Average Speed: 22.9 MPH
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Count over limit N/A N/A 460 1099 586 N/A N/A
% over limit N/A N/A 23.3 22.0 30.5 N/A N/A
Avg Speeder N/A N/A 27.7 27.9 27.8 N/A N/A
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 88 1.0
VEH_MED 8595 96.6
VEH_LG 210 2.4
[ VEH_SM = motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck ]
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by hour:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl counts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/13/2022 03:00:00 PM 27.0 139 163 33 27.6 23.3%
7/13/2022 04:00:00 PM 27.0 285 335 33 27.3 23.9%
7/13/2022 05:00:00 PM 27.0 269 317 33 27.8 24.6%
7/13/2022 06:00:00 PM 26.0 311 366 34 27.8 24.3%
7/13/2022 07:00:00 PM 26.0 219 258 37 27.6 24.0%
7/13/2022 08:00:00 PM 27.0 143 168 34 27.8 25.6%
7/13/2022 09:00:00 PM 26.0 139 163 35 28.0 22.1%
7/13/2022 10:00:00 PM 26.0 80 94 55 29.8 16.0%
7/13/2022 11:00:00 PM 26.0 58 68 36 27.8 19.1%
7/14/2022 12:00:00 AM 25.0 35 41 30 27.3 14.6%
7/14/2022 01:00:00 AM 26.0 22 26 30 27.2 19.2%
7/14/2022 02:00:00 AM 28.0 8 9 29 28.5 22.2%
7/14/2022 03:00:00 AM 26.0 9 11 29 27.7 27.3%
7/14/2022 04:00:00 AM 23.0 3 4 28 28.0 25.0%
7/14/2022 05:00:00 AM 26.0 6 7 28 26.4 71.4%
7/14/2022 06:00:00 AM 26.0 22 26 31 28.2 19.2%
7/14/2022 07:00:00 AM 29.0 36 42 33 28.5 40.5%
7/14/2022 08:00:00 AM 27.0 109 128 32 27.8 35.2%
7/14/2022 09:00:00 AM 28.0 173 204 37 27.9 42.6%
7/14/2022 10:00:00 AM 27.0 170 200 36 28.1 32.0%
7/14/2022 11:00:00 AM 27.0 185 218 34 27.8 30.3%
7/14/2022 12:00:00 PM 27.0 252 297 34 27.7 28.6%
7/14/2022 01:00:00 PM 27.0 288 339 42 28.2 23.0%
7/14/2022 02:00:00 PM 27.0 278 327 37 27.7 25.7%
7/14/2022 03:00:00 PM 26.0 304 358 36 27.6 23.7%
7/14/2022 04:00:00 PM 26.0 279 328 36 27.7 18.3%
7/14/2022 05:00:00 PM 26.0 416 489 40 28.5 17.6%
7/14/2022 06:00:00 PM 26.0 456 537 39 27.9 20.9%
7/14/2022 07:00:00 PM 26.0 334 393 36 27.7 17.3%
7/14/2022 08:00:00 PM 25.0 314 370 38 28.6 12.2%
7/14/2022 09:00:00 PM 25.0 247 291 35 28.1 12.7%
7/14/2022 10:00:00 PM 26.0 196 230 43 28.5 15.7%
7/14/2022 11:00:00 PM 25.0 86 101 32 27.6 13.9%
7/15/2022 12:00:00 AM 25.0 57 67 30 27.2 13.4%
7/15/2022 01:00:00 AM 25.0 37 43 30 29.0 14.0%
7/15/2022 02:00:00 AM 25.0 26 30 45 32.3 13.3%
7/15/2022 03:00:00 AM 25.0 16 19 33 28.3 15.8%
7/15/2022 04:00:00 AM 25.0 3 4 26 26.0 25.0%
7/15/2022 05:00:00 AM 29.0 4 5 30 29.0 60.0%
7/15/2022 06:00:00 AM 27.0 20 24 29 27.7 29.2%
7/15/2022 07:00:00 AM 27.0 40 47 39 28.6 34.0%
7/15/2022 08:00:00 AM 28.0 71 84 34 27.5 46.4%
7/15/2022 09:00:00 AM 28.0 105 123 32 27.9 39.8%
7/15/2022 10:00:00 AM 28.0 186 219 33 27.7 35.2%
7/15/2022 11:00:00 AM 27.0 230 270 33 27.6 32.6%
7/15/2022 12:00:00 PM 27.0 272 320 39 27.7 27.8%
7/15/2022 01:00:00 PM 27.0 277 326 42 28.1 25.8%
7/15/2022 02:00:00 PM 27.0 235 276 33 27.8 29.0%
7/15/2022 03:00:00 PM 27.0 112 132 33 27.7 30.3%
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by day:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl cnts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/14/2022 12:00:00 AM 27.0 1677 1973 55 27.7 23.3%
7/15/2022 12:00:00 AM 27.0 4249 4999 43 27.9 22.0%
7/15/2022 02:59:59 PM 27.0 1633 1921 45 27.8 30.5%
187
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT
For Project: Babcock Black and Bozeman
Projects Notes/Address:
Location/Name: Merged
Report Generated: 1/19/2023 10:05:20 AM
Speed Intervals = 1 MPH
Time Intervals = Instant
Traffic Report From 7/13/2022 03:00:00 PM through 7/15/2022 03:59:59 PM
85th Percentile Speed = 28.0 MPH
85th Percentile Vehicles = 10,021 counts
Max Speed = 49.0 MPH on 7/15/2022 2:42:33 PM
Total Vehicles =11,789 counts
AADT: 5774.2
Volumes - weekly vehicle counts
Time 5 Day 7 Day
Average Daily 3,929 3,929
AM Peak 11:00 to 12:00 425 425
PM Peak 05:00 to 06:00 523 523
Speed
Speed Limit: 25 MPH
85th Percentile Speed: 28.0 MPH
50th Percentile Speed: 24.0 MPH
10 MPH Pace Interval: 18.0 MPH to 28.0 MPH
Average Speed: 23.6 MPH
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Count over limit N/A N/A 747 1775 1200 N/A N/A
% over limit N/A N/A 40.0 28.0 33.5 N/A N/A
Avg Speeder N/A N/A 28.5 28.3 28.5 N/A N/A
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 331 2.8
VEH_MED 11251 95.4
VEH_LG 207 1.8
[ VEH_SM = motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck ]
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by hour:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl counts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/13/2022 04:00:00 PM 28.0 181 213 45 28.5 29.1%
7/13/2022 05:00:00 PM 29.0 314 369 45 28.4 39.6%
7/13/2022 06:00:00 PM 28.0 368 433 37 28.3 33.3%
7/13/2022 07:00:00 PM 28.0 264 311 45 28.3 41.5%
7/13/2022 08:00:00 PM 30.0 190 224 44 28.9 51.3%
7/13/2022 09:00:00 PM 28.0 125 147 35 28.0 42.9%
7/13/2022 10:00:00 PM 29.0 81 95 34 28.4 46.3%
7/13/2022 11:00:00 PM 30.0 45 53 39 29.1 52.8%
7/14/2022 12:00:00 AM 31.0 20 23 35 29.3 69.6%
7/14/2022 01:00:00 AM 29.0 19 22 33 28.4 54.5%
7/14/2022 02:00:00 AM 31.0 8 9 32 29.8 55.6%
7/14/2022 03:00:00 AM 21.0 4 5 25 0.0 0.0%
7/14/2022 04:00:00 AM 26.0 1 1 26 26.0 100.0%
7/14/2022 05:00:00 AM 30.0 6 7 32 29.8 57.1%
7/14/2022 06:00:00 AM 30.0 46 54 35 29.1 72.2%
7/14/2022 07:00:00 AM 32.0 106 125 39 29.6 72.0%
7/14/2022 08:00:00 AM 31.0 259 305 38 29.2 61.0%
7/14/2022 09:00:00 AM 29.0 329 387 36 28.4 53.0%
7/14/2022 10:00:00 AM 28.0 328 386 35 27.7 35.5%
7/14/2022 11:00:00 AM 27.0 241 284 38 28.2 26.8%
7/14/2022 12:00:00 PM 27.0 366 431 48 28.4 27.1%
7/14/2022 01:00:00 PM 26.0 338 398 37 28.1 17.6%
7/14/2022 02:00:00 PM 27.0 386 454 40 28.1 28.0%
7/14/2022 03:00:00 PM 27.0 364 428 34 27.8 22.7%
7/14/2022 04:00:00 PM 27.0 361 425 40 27.9 25.9%
7/14/2022 05:00:00 PM 26.0 383 451 38 27.7 18.6%
7/14/2022 06:00:00 PM 27.0 522 614 43 28.2 26.2%
7/14/2022 07:00:00 PM 25.0 428 503 35 27.9 14.7%
7/14/2022 08:00:00 PM 25.0 332 391 35 27.6 14.3%
7/14/2022 09:00:00 PM 25.0 253 298 33 27.7 14.8%
7/14/2022 10:00:00 PM 26.0 193 227 38 28.1 19.4%
7/14/2022 11:00:00 PM 27.0 69 81 34 28.3 23.5%
7/15/2022 12:00:00 AM 27.0 48 57 35 28.5 29.8%
7/15/2022 01:00:00 AM 30.0 25 29 33 28.2 55.2%
7/15/2022 02:00:00 AM 28.0 20 24 33 28.2 37.5%
7/15/2022 03:00:00 AM 30.0 13 15 34 30.0 33.3%
7/15/2022 04:00:00 AM 32.0 3 4 34 32.0 75.0%
7/15/2022 05:00:00 AM 29.0 8 9 32 28.5 66.7%
7/15/2022 06:00:00 AM 32.0 42 50 46 30.2 82.0%
7/15/2022 07:00:00 AM 31.0 88 104 37 29.4 63.5%
7/15/2022 08:00:00 AM 30.0 207 243 40 28.8 70.4%
7/15/2022 09:00:00 AM 29.0 321 378 41 28.5 51.9%
7/15/2022 10:00:00 AM 28.0 312 367 39 28.4 40.1%
7/15/2022 11:00:00 AM 27.0 326 384 36 27.9 25.3%
7/15/2022 12:00:00 PM 26.0 357 420 40 27.9 19.8%
7/15/2022 01:00:00 PM 26.0 366 430 33 27.4 18.8%
7/15/2022 02:00:00 PM 28.0 374 440 45 28.6 28.9%
7/15/2022 03:00:00 PM 26.0 367 432 49 28.6 18.3%
7/15/2022 04:00:00 PM 27.0 213 251 37 28.1 29.1%
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by day:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl cnts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/14/2022 12:00:00 AM 29.0 1588 1868 45 28.5 40.0%
7/15/2022 12:00:00 AM 27.0 5391 6342 48 28.3 28.0%
7/15/2022 03:59:59 PM 28.0 3042 3579 49 28.5 33.5%
188
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT
For Project: Babcock 3rd and Grand
Projects Notes/Address:
Location/Name: Merged
Report Generated: 1/19/2023 10:03:30 AM
Speed Intervals = 1 MPH
Time Intervals = Instant
Traffic Report From 7/11/2022 01:00:00 PM through 7/13/2022 01:59:59 PM
85th Percentile Speed = 30.0 MPH
85th Percentile Vehicles = 7,806 counts
Max Speed = 48.0 MPH on 7/12/2022 7:00:58 PM
Total Vehicles =9,183 counts
AADT: 4497.8
Volumes - weekly vehicle counts
Time 5 Day 7 Day
Average Daily 3,061 3,061
AM Peak 11:00 to 12:00 368 368
PM Peak 12:00 to 01:00 423 423
Speed
Speed Limit: 25 MPH
85th Percentile Speed: 30.0 MPH
50th Percentile Speed: 26.0 MPH
10 MPH Pace Interval: 21.0 MPH to 31.0 MPH
Average Speed: 25.5 MPH
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Count over limit 1231 2467 1167 N/A N/A N/A N/A
% over limit 54.5 52.8 51.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Avg Speeder 28.7 28.7 29.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 589 6.4
VEH_MED 8313 90.5
VEH_LG 281 3.1
[ VEH_SM = motorcycle, VEH_MED = sedan, VEH_LG = truck ]
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by hour:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl counts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/11/2022 02:00:00 PM 29.0 215 253 36 28.5 56.1%
7/11/2022 03:00:00 PM 30.0 278 327 42 28.6 57.2%
7/11/2022 04:00:00 PM 29.0 267 314 43 28.4 52.9%
7/11/2022 05:00:00 PM 30.0 283 333 47 28.8 52.9%
7/11/2022 06:00:00 PM 29.0 302 355 41 28.5 53.8%
7/11/2022 07:00:00 PM 31.0 182 214 40 29.0 61.2%
7/11/2022 08:00:00 PM 30.0 156 184 41 28.9 55.4%
7/11/2022 09:00:00 PM 30.0 99 117 38 29.1 52.1%
7/11/2022 10:00:00 PM 31.0 72 85 37 29.9 44.7%
7/11/2022 11:00:00 PM 29.0 44 52 43 30.0 48.1%
7/12/2022 12:00:00 AM 30.0 20 23 33 28.8 52.2%
7/12/2022 01:00:00 AM 28.0 13 15 32 28.5 40.0%
7/12/2022 02:00:00 AM 28.0 3 4 29 27.5 100.0%
7/12/2022 03:00:00 AM 26.0 4 5 28 26.5 80.0%
7/12/2022 04:00:00 AM 26.0 2 2 26 26.0 50.0%
7/12/2022 05:00:00 AM 32.0 4 5 33 29.8 80.0%
7/12/2022 06:00:00 AM 31.0 17 20 34 29.5 65.0%
7/12/2022 07:00:00 AM 33.0 52 61 39 30.0 73.8%
7/12/2022 08:00:00 AM 32.0 172 202 40 29.6 70.8%
7/12/2022 09:00:00 AM 30.0 286 336 44 29.0 60.1%
7/12/2022 10:00:00 AM 30.0 237 279 40 29.0 53.0%
7/12/2022 11:00:00 AM 30.0 274 322 45 28.9 57.8%
7/12/2022 12:00:00 PM 29.0 298 350 40 28.6 47.1%
7/12/2022 01:00:00 PM 29.0 342 402 38 28.2 47.3%
7/12/2022 02:00:00 PM 29.0 318 374 38 28.5 44.4%
7/12/2022 03:00:00 PM 29.0 307 361 38 28.5 50.4%
7/12/2022 04:00:00 PM 30.0 309 364 36 28.8 48.1%
7/12/2022 05:00:00 PM 30.0 330 388 35 28.6 52.8%
7/12/2022 06:00:00 PM 30.0 360 423 39 28.6 57.7%
7/12/2022 07:00:00 PM 29.0 243 286 35 28.4 55.9%
7/12/2022 08:00:00 PM 30.0 167 196 48 29.3 51.5%
7/12/2022 09:00:00 PM 29.0 116 136 37 28.7 44.1%
7/12/2022 10:00:00 PM 30.0 61 72 36 29.0 47.2%
7/12/2022 11:00:00 PM 29.0 36 42 36 29.3 33.3%
7/13/2022 12:00:00 AM 28.0 26 30 31 27.5 50.0%
7/13/2022 01:00:00 AM 28.0 8 9 32 28.8 44.4%
7/13/2022 02:00:00 AM 30.0 6 7 30 28.8 57.1%
7/13/2022 03:00:00 AM 23.0 2 2 23 0.0 0.0%
7/13/2022 04:00:00 AM 26.0 2 2 26 26.0 100.0%
7/13/2022 05:00:00 AM 36.0 5 6 37 31.8 83.3%
7/13/2022 06:00:00 AM 29.0 18 21 36 28.9 61.9%
7/13/2022 07:00:00 AM 32.0 55 65 36 30.1 73.8%
7/13/2022 08:00:00 AM 32.0 184 217 38 29.7 67.7%
7/13/2022 09:00:00 AM 31.0 273 321 37 29.0 65.4%
7/13/2022 10:00:00 AM 30.0 268 315 40 29.1 55.9%
7/13/2022 11:00:00 AM 29.0 258 303 41 28.6 49.5%
7/13/2022 12:00:00 PM 29.0 329 387 39 28.7 39.5%
7/13/2022 01:00:00 PM 29.0 377 444 38 28.6 41.9%
7/13/2022 02:00:00 PM 29.0 129 152 46 28.4 45.4%
85th percentile speeds, counts and total counts by day:
Date/Time Ending 85th pctl(MPH) 85th pctl cnts Total Cnts Max Speed Avg Speeder % Speeders
7/12/2022 12:00:00 AM 30.0 1918 2257 47 28.7 54.5%
7/13/2022 12:00:00 AM 30.0 3974 4675 48 28.7 52.8%
7/13/2022 01:59:59 PM 30.0 1913 2251 46 29.0 51.8%
189
190
Downtown Bozeman Partnership – ED Report
April 2023
General Downtown Updates:
• DBP Office/Programs:
o BID Board Meeting – Wednesday, April 19 at 12pm
o DBP Annual Report 2022 – final document coming soon
o DBP Resource Guide 2023 – is complete and be viewed online at: https://s3.us-west-
2.amazonaws.com/dba-2021/DBP-Resource-Guide_2023_2023-03-01-225233_jnfp.pdf
o FY24 Budgets and Work Plans have begun. Draft budgets will be reviewed through April and
May at relevant board or committee meetings. The DBA Board will approve at their May 2
meeting. DURD and BID Budgets/Works Plans will be presented to the City Commission on May
16 meeting.
• Downtown Maintenance: Still looking… $18/hr., great work environment, for job listing visit
https://downtownbozeman.org/downtown-jobs/part-time-winter-seasonal-downtown-maintenance-
employee.
• UTD Update: On May 2nd an important vote will be held to determine if the Gallatin Valley Urban
Transportation District will be created, and Streamline will continue to meet the needs of our growing
area. To make this happen, we need groups who are excited
to https://yesforstreamline.org/endorsements/ and engage their networks to vote visit
https://yesforstreamline.org/.
• Trainings/Volunteer Work Updates:
o Leadership Montana – Ellie is a part of LMT class 20223, next session is April 26-28 in Havre,
graduation is June 2, 2023.
o Special Olympics Montana – May 17-19, 2023, volunteers needed!
https://www.somt.org/volunteer/games-volunteers/
o CPTED Training – Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Emily is attending a 5-day
intensive workshop in Billings and receiving a national certification in April.
Downtown/DURD Project Updates:
• Alley Project: We’re excited to announce that there’s been significant progress on the Alley Project
design. We presented the preliminary design concepts to the adjacent business/property owners to
discuss details and specifically TRASH, which will be the largest hurdle to overcome regarding this
project. The CCOA has been submitted, the CALL FOR ART deadline is May 5 at
https://downtownbozeman.org/news/downtown-bozeman-alley-project-call-for-art. We’re hopeful all
design work is completed through spring 2023 with construction work through summer 2023.
• Transportation Plan Update: We had an approved task order to move forward with the phase two of the
downtown transportation plan with a focus on pedestrian safety and traffic calming on Babcock and
Mendenhall.
• Downtown REwrap Electrical Box Project – Re-wrapping after 11 years. CALL FOR ART now LIVE!!
https://downtownbozeman.org/news/downtown-bozeman-rewrap
191
• Downtown Parking Task Force Update: The same parking task force that developed the report presented
to the City Commission has requested to continue meeting and talking about future parking
management and supply projects. The DBP staff will keep all board updated on this group’s work.
• North Black Pocket Park: Concrete was poured but progress was halted in late Oct. due to early and
consistent snow. Pavers and street furniture can be installed in cooler temps so we will start again right
when snow begins to melt. Greenspace has been hired and has poured the cement pads and site
borders. Work to be completed by early 2023.
• Tree Replacement Project CONTINUES: Thirteen trees were cut down between 2020 and 2022. The
unusually large amount removed due to drought as well as staffing and covid impacted the ability of the
City Forestry Department to complete the work in a timely manner. The DBP replaced 5 trees summer of
2022 and then through summer 2023, the DBP will handle replacing 3 more trees while the City will
handle the remaining 5 with intention for ALL current stumped trees to be removed and replanted by
fall 2023.
Upcoming DBP/DBA Events
• Restaurant Week, April 24-30, www.downtownbozeman.org/rw
• DBP Annual Breakfast, May 31 at 7:30am – SAVE the DATE coming soon
City of Bozeman/Community Updates:
• City Commission Meetings – Next meeting – April 18 at 6pm
o The six-month City Commission calendar can be found here:
https://www.bozeman.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=10727. Previously recorded public
meetings and live streams of meetings may be viewed here:
https://www.bozeman.net/services/city-tv-and-streaming-audio.
• Unified Development Code Edit (2023): Continued topics impacting downtown: Commercial Districts,
Zone Transitions & Parking. For more details and a zoom link to the webinar, visit
https://engage.bozeman.net/udc
New Businesses/Building Projects:
• JW Heist is now open, traditional Montana steakhouse.
• Carter’s Boots moved to Huffine and Inland Boutique opened at 234 East Main
• Onyx is now open in Cactus Record’s old space
• Meridian Men opening in old Silver Annie’s space
• Grey Dog Bar open on North Bozeman, not sure on details
• Est. 1864 (a “noir bar”) opening soon under Main Street Market
• LV Wood West now open at 225 East Mendenhall (formerly Onyx tile)
• El Camino/Kitty Warren closed and for sale or lease
• Downtown Antiques closing soon, sale going on
• Smoke, Fire & Coal closed
• Chocolate Moose for sale
• Additional vacancies: Little Angels, Main Street Market (slated for Stio to open in summer)
• US Bank Building (104 East Main)—Development project continues, to be restored to original façade.
• Village Downtown 92 condos are under construction on the other lot to the South of the existing Lofts
building.
• North Central (20 North Tracy)—Mountain View & Medical Arts buildings, phased master site plan
development proposing a total of 9 new mixed-use buildings, associated parking, open space and
infrastructure. Lots of construction underway.
192