Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-28-23 City Commission Meeting Agenda & Packet Materials
A.Call to Order - 6:00 PM - Commission Room, City Hall, 121 North Rouse B.Pledge of Allegiance and a Moment of Silence C.Changes to the Agenda D.FYI E.Commission Disclosures F.Consent F.1 Accounts Payable Claims Review and Approval (Waters) F.2 Approve the Final Plat for the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision, App 22242(Montana) F.3 Approve and Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the THE CITY COMMISSION OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, February 28, 2023 This meeting will be held both in-person and also using Webex, an online videoconferencing system. You can join this meeting: Via Webex: Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit. Click Join Now to enter the meeting. Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream, channel 190, or attend in-person United States Toll +1-650-479-3208 Access code: 2558 990 5526 If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda please send an email to agenda@bozeman.net prior to 12:00pm on the day of the meeting. Public comments will be accepted in-person during the appropriate agenda items. You may also comment by visiting the Commission's comment page. You can also comment by joining the Webex meeting. If you do join the Webex meeting, we ask you please be patient in helping us work through this hybrid meeting. As always, the meeting will be streamed through the Commission's video page and available in the City on cable channel 190. 1 Saccoccia Minor Subsequent Subdivision Preliminary Plat, Application 21430(Montana) F.4 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Notice of Award to Landfill Drilling and Piping, Inc. for Construction of the 2023 LFG and Leachate/Condensate System Improvements Project(Flammond) F.5 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Agreement Accepting a Donation in the Amount of $1,000,000 from the Bozeman Public Library Foundation for the Second Installment for Construction Services for the Bozeman Public Library Renovation Project(Henderson) F.6 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Agreement Accepting a Donation in the Amount of $56,250 from the Bozeman Public Library Foundation for Public Engagement and Concept Design Services for the Bozeman Community Center Project(Henderson) F.7 Authorize the City Manager and Chief of Police to Sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Missouri River Drug Task Force for Fiscal Years 2024 and 2025(Veltkamp) F.8 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Construction Agreement with Western Systems to Install a Transportation Management Center, Communication Network, and Signal Switches at the City Shops(Van Delinder) F.9 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Lease-Purchase Agreement with Lease Servicing Center, Inc dba NCL Government Capital for a 2022 Elgin Broom Bear Sweeper(VanDelinder) F.10 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement with Green Gardens Group LLC for a Bozeman Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series(Ahlstrom) F.11 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement for ESRI Professional Services to Provide Consulting Services for ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade Support(Jorgenson) F.12 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement with Sanderson Stewart for the Transportation Engineering Term Contract(Lonsdale) F.13 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a First Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with Aero-Graphics, Inc.(Jorgenson) F.14 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. for Landscape Maintenance Services in the Parks and Trails District(Kline ) F.15 Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Task Order 6 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) for an Economic Vitality Strategy (EVS) Update to Include Arts and Culture and to Highlight Sustainability and Climate Action in the 2022-2023 EVS(Fontenot) F.16 Ordinance 2130, Provisional Adoption, South 40 Zone Map Amendment to rezone a parcel from R-2 (Residential Moderate Density) and R-1 (Residential Low Density) to REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use) on 41.38 Acres, Application 22279, a Property Located at the Southeast Corner of South 19th Avenue and West Graf Street(Rogers) 2 G.Public Comment This is the time to comment on any matter falling within the scope of the Bozeman City Commission. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public comment relating to that item but you may only speak once. Please note, the City Commission cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All persons addressing the City Commission shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the audience shall be respectful of others. Please state your name and address in an audible tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three minutes. Written comments can be located in the Public Comment Repository. H.Action Items H.1 West Park Neighborhood Preliminary Plat Application, to Subdivide Four Restricted Development Lots Platted with Norton East Ranch Phase 6 into Four Restricted Development Lots with Associated Stormwater, Open Space, City Park, Easements, and Right-of-way, Located Northeast of the Corner of Laurel Parkway and West Babcock Street, Application 22178 (Quasi-Judicial)(Lyon) H.2 Public Hearing and Decision for Preliminary Plat for the Urban Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision, Application 22082 (Quasi-Judicial)(Lyon) H.3 Resolution 5447, The MSU Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment to Amend the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 Future Land Use Map from Public Institutions to Regional Commercial and Services on Approximately 42 Acres Located Southwest of the Intersection of College Street and S. 23rd Avenue, Application 22282(Saunders) I.Work Session I.1 UDC Project - Review and Advise Regarding the Update to the Unified Development Code, Chapter 38, Bozeman Municipal Code to Address Potential Changes to Standards Relating to Numbers of Parking Spaces, Application 21381(Bentley) I.2 Kagy Revisited Work Session(Ross) J.Appointments J.1 Appointment of the Gallatin County Designee to the Community Development Advisory Board(Maas) K.FYI / Discussion L.Adjournment City Commission meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Mike Gray, at 582-3232 (TDD 582-2301). Commission meetings are televised live on cable channel 190 and streamed live at www.bozeman.net. In order for the City Commission to receive all relevant public comment in time for this City Commission meeting, please submit via www.bozeman.net or by emailing agenda@bozeman.net no later than 12:00 PM on the day of the meeting. Public comment may be made in person at the 3 meeting as well. 4 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Nadine Waters, Accounts Payable Clerk Nicole Armstrong, Accounts Payable Clerk Levi Stewart, Assistant City Controller Aaron Funk, City Controller Melissa Hodnett, Finance Director SUBJECT:Accounts Payable Claims Review and Approval MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Finance RECOMMENDATION:The City Commission is recommended to make a motion and approve payment of claims as presented. STRATEGIC PLAN:7.5. Funding and Delivery of City Services: Use equitable and sustainable sources of funding for appropriate City services, and deliver them in a lean and efficient manner. BACKGROUND:Montana Code Annotated, Section 7-6-4301 requires the City Commission to review claims prior to payment. Claims presented to the City Commission under this item have been reviewed and validated by the Finance Department. The Department has ensured that all goods and services have been received along with necessary authorizations and supporting documentation. Additionally, the Department confirmed all expenditures were appropriately coded and within the current fiscal year allocated budget. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:The City Commission could decide not to approve these claims or a portion of the claims presented. This alternative is not recommended as it may result in unbudgeted late fees assessed against the City. FISCAL EFFECTS:The total amount of the claims to be paid is presented at the bottom of the Expenditure Approval List posted on the City’s website at https://www.bozeman.net/departments/finance/purchasing. Report compiled on: February 23, 2023 5 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Susana Montana, Senior Planner, Development Review Division Brian Krueger, Manager, Development Review Division Erin George, Deputy Director Anna Bentley, Director, Community Development Department SUBJECT:Approve the Final Plat for the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision, App 22242 MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Quasi-Judicial RECOMMENDATION:Approve the Final Plat for the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: In November 2022, the Blackwood Land Fund, LLC, (“Applicant”) submitted an application for a Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision Final Plat consisting of Lot R1 of Block 14 of the 119.45 acre Blackwood Groves Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat. The Preliminary Plat was approved in May 2021 to create a mixed use neighborhood that includes 127 single-household lots, 14 multi-household lots, 22 townhouse/rowhouse lots, 3 commercial lots, 8 common open space lots, and 16 City Park lots. The Commission approved the Preliminary Plat Findings of Fact (FOF), Project 20447, on May 25, 2021 and the FOF was signed on June 22, 2021 and is attached to this Memo. The Blackwood Groves property is zoned REMU, Residential Emphasis Mixed Use. The Blackwood Groves subdivision property has an approved Master Site Plan for the entire development (Project 20292). The Preliminary Plat subdivision is proposed to be developed in 9 phases. Each phase will have its own final plat recorded and site plan approved prior to any building permit approvals. This Phase 2 final plat would provide 55 small single- household dwellings in the northern portion of the lot with its own site plan and would provide several apartment-type multi-household dwelling units on the southern portion of the lot with its own site plan. The subdivider is the developer of the homes and would complete the development within a one year period. 6 On February 6, 2023 the Development Review Committee (DRC) found that the final plat application meets the conditions of approval of the Preliminary Plat and is sufficient for consideration for approval. The final decision for this final plat must be made within 45 working days of the date the application was deemed adequate for consideration for approval. Therefore, it must be reviewed by the City Commission by April 4, 2023. This Phase 2 Final Plat requires an Improvements Agreement (IA) and Financial Surety to install public streets and street lighting for this subdivision. A financial surety in the amount of $ 1,917,036.32 was received in the form of a Letter of Credit No. 1690000554 from the Stockman Bank of Montana. The City Transportation and Engineering Department Director and Department of Community Development Director have reviewed the application against the conditions of the preliminary plat approval and find that the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision Final Plat application satisfies the conditions of approval and code provisions of the Preliminary Plat and may be approved by the City Commission. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:None proposed. FISCAL EFFECTS:Fiscal impacts are undetermined at this time but will include increased property tax revenues from new development, along with increased costs to deliver municipal services to the development. Attachments: 22242 BWG Ph 2 FP Commission Memo.pdf 001 Final Plat Map_Sheet 1_Certificates.pdf 002 Final Plat Map_Sheet 2_Overall.pdf 003 Final Plat Map_Sheet 3_Phase 2 Detailed.pdf 004 Final Plat Map_Sheet 4_Conditions of Approval and Notes.pdf Report compiled on: February 6, 2023 7 Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Mayor and City Commission FROM: Susana Montana, Senior Planner Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Erin George, Deputy Director of Community Development Anna Bentley, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Approve the Final Plat for the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision and authorize the Director of Transportation and Engineering to execute the same on behalf of the City of Bozeman and authorize the Director of Community Development to execute the improvements agreements on behalf of the City of Bozeman; Application No. 22242. STRATEGIC PLAN: 4.2 High Quality Urban Approach. Continue to support high quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. MEETING DATE: February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Consent—Quasi-Judicial RECOMMENDATION: That the City Commission approve the Final Plat for the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision and authorize the Director of Transportation and Engineering to execute the same on behalf of the City of Bozeman and authorize the Director of Community Development to execute the improvements agreements on behalf of the City of Bozeman. BACKGROUND: The Blackwood Land Fund, LLC, (“Applicant”) submitted a Final Plat application for the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision on November 10, 2022 requesting to subdivide a 16.78 acre Lot R1 of Block 14 into two lots. Lot R1 of Block 14 is part of a larger 119.45 acre Blackwood Groves Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat which was approved in May 2021 to create a mixed use neighborhood that includes 127 single-household lots, 14 multi-household lots, 22 townhouse/rowhouse lots, 3 commercial lots, 8 common open space lots, and 16 City Park lots. The Commission approved the Preliminary Plat Findings of Fact (FOF), Project 20447, on May 25, 2021 and the FOF was signed on June 22, 2021 and is attached to this Memo. The property is zoned REMU, Residential Emphasis Mixed Use. The Blackwood Groves subdivision has an approved Master Site Plan for the entire subdivision (Project No. 20292). The subdivision is proposed to be developed in 9 phases. Each phase will have its own final plat recorded and site plan approved prior to any building permit approvals. This Phase 2 final plat would provide single-household dwellings in the 8 northern Lot 1 with its own site plan and would provide apartment-type multi-household dwellings on the southern Lot 2 with its own site plan. On February 6, 2023 the Development Review Committee (DRC) found that the final plat application meets the conditions of approval of the Preliminary Plat and is sufficient for consideration for approval. The final decision for this final plat must be made by within 45 working days of the date the application was deemed adequate for consideration for approval. Therefore, it must be reviewed by the City Commission by April 4, 2023. This Phase 2 Final Plat requires an Improvements Agreement (IA) and Financial Surety to allow concurrent construction of Street Lighting, Park Improvements, Open Space Improvements and Sidewalks on private lots with the development of the subdivision. The IA and Financial Surety guarantees the installation of these improvements within one year of approval of the final plat, pursuant to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) Sections 38.270.030.B and D. A financial surety in the amount of $1,893,669.47was received in the form of a check from the developer. Therefore, based on the summary review provided below, the City Transportation and Engineering Department and Department of Community Development have reviewed the application against the conditions of the preliminary plat approval and, as a result, find that the Blackwood Groves Phase 2 Major Subdivision Final Plat application may be approved by the City Commission. §76-3-611(1), MCA, provides that the City Commission shall approve the plat only if: (a) it conforms to the conditions of approval set forth on the preliminary plat and to the terms of this chapter and regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter; and (b) the County Treasurer has certified that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided have been paid. The County Treasurer has certified that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to subdivide have been paid. All terms and conditions of the preliminary plat approval have been met. The signed findings of fact for the Blackwood Groves Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat can be viewed at this link: https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=237813&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None identified. ALTERNATIVES: None suggested or proposed. FISCAL EFFECTS: Fiscal impacts are undetermined at this time, but will include increased property tax revenues from new development, along with increased costs to deliver municipal services to the property. Report compiled on: February 22, 2023 Attachment: Final Plat 9 10 11 12 PHASE 2 LOTSBLOCKOPEN SPACE (SF)PARK SPACE (SF)LOTS (SF)TOTAL (SF)139,0819,08114199,809199,80915109,458109,4581617,90071,97989,879196,6356,635PARK 929,69129,691PARK 1041,32741,327PARK 1120,90020,900PHASE 1 & 9 R.O.W.453,328PHASE 2 R.O.W.222,129SOUTH 19TH AVE R.O.W19,961REMAINDER LOTSR21,291,156R3782,425R4453,797R5335,689TOTALS:33,61691,918381,2464,065,265BLACKWOOD GROVES SUBDIVISION - MASTER PARKLAND TRACKING TABLECumulativePhases 1, 2, and 9Preliminary PlatPhase 1Phase 2Phase 9Net Residential Land Area (Acres)64.2013.368.727.8529.93Required Parkland up to 8 DU/AC (Acres)112.832.892.091.886.87Provided Parkland - Improved - Gross (Acres)18.342.902.1105.01Provided Parkland - Improved - Qualifying (Acres)10.882.222.0704.29Balance Acreage Owed (Acres)1.950.670.021.882.58Unimproved Parkland Provided this Plat for Future Phases (Acres)2 -8.80-2.0706.73Cash- or Improvements-in-Lieu Owed: 8 - 12 DU/AC (Acres)5.150.591.050.942.58Total Cash- or Improvements-in-Lieu Owed (Acres)7.101.261.072.835.16Parkland Appraisal Value ($ per SF) $ 1.72 $ 2.07 $ 2.30 $ 2.30 $ 2.30Cash- or Improvements-in-Lieu Owed $ 531,890.25 $ 113,775.50 $ 107,020.82 $ 283,071.18 $ 503,867.49Value of Required Baseline Park Improvements $ 1,666,495.00 $ 305,666.67 $ 163,840.23 $ - $ 469,506.90Value of Additional Park Improvements-in-Lieu $ 790,736.00 $ 204,883.00 $ 175,420.00 $ - $ 380,303.00Value of Unimproved Parkland Provided this Plat for Future Phases - $ 793,606.18 $ (207,409.20) $ - $ 586,196.98Surplus Land and Improvements-in-Lieu Value $ 256,601.00 $ 884,713.68 $ 462,632.49 Surplus Land and Improvements-in-Lieu Equivalent Area (Acres)3.429.814.6213 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Susana Montana, Senior Planner, Development Review Division Brian Krueger, Manager, Development Review Division Erin George, Deputy Director Community Development Department Anna Bentley, Director, Community Development Department SUBJECT:Approve and Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Saccoccia Minor Subsequent Subdivision Preliminary Plat, Application 21430 MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Quasi-Judicial RECOMMENDATION:Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Finding of Fact and Order staff report for the Saccoccia Minor Subsequent Subdivision Preliminary Plat; Application 21430. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: This is a minor subsequent subdivision Preliminary Plat for the “Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407”. The Preliminary Plat subdivision was conditionally-approved by the Commission on February 7, 2023 by a 4 to 0 unanimous vote, with the recommended conditions and code provisions. This subdivision of the existing 5.53-acre Lot 2A is to create two commercial buildable lots consisting of a 3.49-acre Lot 2A1 and a 2.04-acre Lot 2A2 lying within the B-2, Community Business zoning district within the Saccoccia/Lowe’s Planned Unit Development (PUD). The existing Lot 2A has an approved site plan for a hotel development, Project No. 19394, for a Home 2 Home hotel. This hotel site plan did not use any of the proposed Lot 2A2 land and, therefore, the current owner/Applicant seeks to separate that unused portion of the larger Lot 2A to create one new buildable commercial Lot 2A2. The subdivision creates a 14 new "legal and physical access" to the new Lot 2A2. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:None suggested. FISCAL EFFECTS:Fiscal impacts are undetermined at this time but will include increased property tax revenues from new development, along with increased costs to deliver municipal services to the property. Attachments: 21430 Saccoccia PP FOF CC staff rpt.docx Report compiled on: February 13, 2023 15 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for Saccoccia Minor Subsequent Subdivision Preliminary Plat; 21430 Page 1 of 27 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Saccocia Minor Subsequent Subdivision Preliminary Plat; Application No. 21430 Public MeetingDate:City Commission, February 28, 2023 at 6:00 pm in the City Hall Commission Room as well as remotely using an online videoconferencing system. Please see the Commission agenda for instructions. Project Description: This is a minor subsequent subdivision Preliminary Plat for the “Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407”. This subdivision of the existing 5.53-acre Lot 2A is to create two commercial buildable lots consisting of a 3.49-acre Lot 2A1 and a 2.04-acre Lot 2A2 lying within the B-2, Community Business zoning district within the Saccoccia/Lowe’s Planned Unit Development (PUD). The existing Lot 2A has an approved site plan for a hotel development, Project No. 19394,for a Home 2 Home hotel. This hotel site plan did not use any of the proposed Lot 2A2 land and, therefore, the current owner/Applicant seeks to separate that unused portion of the larger Lot 2A to create two new buildable commercial lots. Project Legal Description: Preliminary Plat of the Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 located in the NE ¼ of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Project Location:South of Baxter Lane, west of Sacco Drive, east of the southernmost terminus of Simmental Way and north of Tschache Lane. City Commission Action: On February 7, 2023, the City Commission, after having reviewed the application materials, public comment and all the information presented, by a 4 to 0 unanimous vote, adopted the findings presented in the staff report for application 21430 and approved the Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Report Date:February 10, 2023 Staff Contact:Susana Montana, Senior Planner Karl Johnson, Project Engineer Agenda Item Type: Action (Quasi-judicial) 16 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 2 of 27 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues None. Project Summary This report is based on the November 23, 2021 revised plat maps and the December 2, 2022 revised application materials and any public comment received to date. The property owner/Applicant submitted a minor subsequent subdivision preliminary plat application to subdivide the 5.53-acre Lot 2A to create two commercial buildable lots consisting of a 3.49-acre Lot 2A1 and a 2.04-acre Lot 2A2. The existing Lot 2A has an approved site plan for a hotel development, Project No. 19394 for a Home-2-Home hotel. This hotel site plan did not use the proposed Lot 2A2 land and, therefore, the Applicant seeks to separate that portion of the larger Lot 2 to create a new buildable lot. The property is zoned B-2, Community Business and Saccoccia/Lowes PUD. Pursuant to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) Section 38.240.130.A.5.a.(3), the final decision for a subsequent minor subdivision preliminary plat must be made within 60 working days of the date it was deemed adequate for further review. The Development Review Committee (DRC) deemed the application adequate for continued review on January 24, 2023 and public notice began on January 24, 2023 by posting a public notice on the Site and mailing the same to adjacent property owners. Pursuant 38.240.130, the City Commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny the subdivision application by March 24, 2023, unless there is a written extension from the developer, not to exceed one year. The Commission conditionally-approved this preliminary plat on February 7, 2023. No public comment has been received to date. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the application with the recommended conditions; 2. Recommend approval of the application with modifications to the staff-recommended conditions; 3. Recommend denial of the application based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Recommend that the City Commission continue the public hearing on the application to a later date, with specific direction to staff or the Applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. This alternative is requested if the Commissionwishes to amend or add conditions of approval. 17 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 3 of 27 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 Unresolved Issues............................................................................................................... 2 Project Summary................................................................................................................. 2 Alternatives......................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES.......................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES ................................................................................. 8 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL............................................ 8 SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAT CORRECTIONS...................... 11 SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS.......................................... 13 SECTION 6 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS................................................................. 14 SECTION 7 -- FINDINGS OF FACT, ORDER AND APPEAL PROVISIONS………………24 APPENDIX A -- PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY………………………26 APPENDIX B -- NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT…………………………………….27 APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION................................................................................ 27 ATTACHMENT LINK ................................................................................................................ 27 18 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 4 of 27 SECTION 1 -MAP SERIES Figure 1. Location Map Figure 2. Vicinity Map 19 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 5 of 27 Figure 3: Zoning classification: B-2, Community Business District Figure 4: Saccoccia/Lowe’s PUD area; Preliminary Plat area shown in red rectangle Site 20 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 6 of 27 Figure 5:Vicinity Map; subdivision Site noted in red Figure 6: Photo of the Site; view west from Sacco Drive Existing Lot 2A 21 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for Saccoccia Minor Subsequent Subdivision Preliminary Plat; 21430 Page 7 of 27 Figure 7: Home 2 Home approved hotel site plan for eastern half of existing Lot 2A Figure 8: Approved site plan for Home 2 Home hotel on east side of Lot 2A Note the 30 ft. wide pedestrian easement trail leading to the Sacco Drive sidewalk on Lot 2A1 and continues north to Baxter Lane. 20 ft.and 10 ft/wide mutual access easement from Baxter to new Lot 2A2 (see Condition 1b). 22 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 8 of 27 Figure 9: Proposed Preliminary Plat (12/02/21 plat revision) Note the 25’ wide trail corridor providing legal access to Lot 2A2 from the west and to and through the new Lot 2A1 to Sacco Drive on the east (see also Condition of Approval No. 1c). SECTION 2 –REQUESTED VARIANCES There are no variances requested with this subdivision application although the Applicant is seeking approval of an alternate legal and physical access to the new Lot 2A2 as part of this application.Please see Section 6, No. 11 on page 17 below for details. SECTION 3 -RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions of approval and code provisions are offered to satisfy City and relevant State requirements as well as site-specific mitigation for potential adverse impacts associated with development of the proposed subdivision. The conditions of approval are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report.The conditions are specific to the preliminary plat application. Staff has considered the impacts as identified in the staff analysis and application materials and these conditions of approval are deemed reasonably related and roughly proportionate to the development of this subdivision. Lot 1A Lot 2A1 Lot 2A2 23 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 9 of 27 1. BMC 38.400.090.B.2.c,Access and 38.220.070.A.7, Final Plat Submittal Requirements. The Applicantshall provide with the final plat submittal documents demonstrating the following: a. The legal and physical access to Lot 2A2 is properly shown and labeled on the final plat submittal; b. In order to provide legal and physical access to Lot 2A2, per BMC 38.400.090.B.2.c, an irrevocable30-feet wide vehicular public access easement extending fromthe southern edge of the Baxter Lane right-of-way (ROW) and extending a minimum of 25-feet along the Lot 2A2 frontage, shall be shown on the plat sheet and shall be recorded prior to final plat approval; c. In order to provide legal and physical access to Lot 2A2, per BMC 38.400.090.B.2.c, a perpetual 25-feet wide trail corridor public access easement shall be shown, dimensioned and labeled on Lot 2A2 and it shall extend to the eastern boundary where it would connect to a minimum6-feet wide pedestrian public access easement on Lot 2A1 that extends to Sacco Drive; both these easements shall be recorded prior to final plat approval; d. the Applicant shall record a mutual maintenance agreement between the owner(s) of Lots 2A1 and 2A2 prior to final plat approval and this maintenance shall include regular, appropriate snow removal to assure safe passage of pedestrians; and e. the Applicant shall submit with a final plat application an Improvement Plan for the improvement of the public access easement “alley” leading to Lot 2A2 which shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval [see Section 6. B number 11 on page 17 below for details]. 2. BMC 38.220.070.A.7. Final Plat Submittal Requirements. The final plat must contain the following notations on the Conditions of Approval sheet: a. All public stormwater facilities not on property dedicated to the City of Bozeman shall be located within public drainage easements that provide for storm water facility maintenance responsibility by the property owners association. b. The following note shall be included in the Conditions of Approval sheet of the Final plat: “Due to known high groundwater conditions in the area, no basements will be permitted with future development of the site. No crawl spaces will be permitted with future development of the site unless a professional engineer registered in the State of Montana certifies that the lowest point of any proposed structure is located above the seasonal high groundwater level and provides supporting groundwater data to the City Engineering Department prior to the release of any building permit for the development. In addition, sump pumps are not allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system or the drainage system unless capacity is designed into the drainage system to accept the pumped water. Water from sump pumps may not be discharged on streets, such as into the curb and gutters, where they may create a safety hazard for pedestrians and vehicles.” c. All downstream water user facilities will not be impacted by this subdivision. 24 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 10 of 27 d. If water rights or cash-in-lieu of water rights, have not been provided with final plat, then water rights or cash-in-lieu must be provided with any future sketch plan, site plan development or applicable development application. e. TheSite lies within a Special Street Lighting ImprovementDistrict(SLID). Street lights would be provided for the Home 2 Home hotel as part of that approved site plan. It is unknown at this point as to whether the public access “alley” to Lot 2A2 would require street lighting. The Applicant shall submit a document specifying that, in the event an SLID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of the improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The Applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to final plat approval. 3.BMC 40.04.700.A.4 -Stormwater management plans and comprehensive drainage plans shall: a. Prevent any off-site direct discharge of untreated stormwater and non-stormwater from development or redevelopment improvements. i. It appears a majority of Basin 1 will drain offsite. Provide sufficient detail to insure drainage will reach the proposed destination. b. Implement accepted BMPs to minimize impact of a development on existing offsite infrastructure and stormwater facilities. i. The Applicant has described the use of a pretreatment forebay for the existing wet detention basin. The proposed pretreatment forebay does not meet the following recommendations for pretreatment forebays in the Montana Post-Construction Storm Water BMP Design Guidance Manual. a. A barrier separating the pretreatment forebay and wetpool cell should be constructed to contain the forebay opposite of the inlet. b. A concrete bottom is recommended to facilitate sediment removal during maintenance. c. Provide a way to monitor sediment accumulation. c. Comply with section II of the City Design Standards, and chapter 38, article 23. i. The Applicanthas described utilizing the existing Lowe’s detention pond to comply with this section. The Applicant has adequately demonstrated the subject property can be adequately served by the Lowes detention pond as designed. The stormwater design report for the Lowe’s PUD describes “the hydraulic capacity of the pond for stormwater runoff functions is the top 1.5 feet of the pond.” The water surface elevation is currently above the pond outlet as observed 12-24-2021 (a time of little to no runoff due to winter conditions). The existing condition of the pond does not allow for any storage of runoff from the subject property as proposed and therefore utilizing this pond in its current condition would not satisfy the requirements of Section II of the city Design Standards. The Applicant must provide a means of stormwater storage on site or provide maintenance or modification to the existing Lowe’s PUD pond to provide adequate storage for the subject property. 4. The subject property is located within the N 19th and Baxter Intersection Payback. The payback must be paid prior to Final Plat approval. 25 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 11 of 27 SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAT CORRECTIONS The following are procedural requirements not yet demonstrated by the plat and must be satisfied at the final plat application. 1. BMC 38.100.080.A.The Applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. BMC 38.220.070. The Applicant shall submit with the application for final plat review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plat approval and noted code provisions herein have been satisfactorily addressed. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 3.BMC 38.410.130. Water Rights. Compliance with code requirements for water rights shall be met per Condition of Approval No. 2.d. The Applicant shall provide documentation of all water rights appurtenant to the proposed subdivision; e.g. previous estimates or actual payment -in-lieu of water rights, certified well logs, decrees or adjudications, etc. The Applicant must contact Griffin Nielsen with the City of Bozeman Engineering Department for any cash in lieu of water rights determination. 4. BMC 38.410.060.A. The final platmust provide all remaining preexisting and new utility and public access easements and they must be shown, dimensioned and properly labeled/describedon each subdivision block of the final platin their true and correct location. All easements indicated below must be provided on City standard easements templates. Drafts must be submitted with the final plat application for review and approval prior to final plat approval. Signed hard copies of the easements must be submitted to the City Engineering Department. Recorded easement numbers must be provided on the final plat prior to final platapproval. The Applicantmay contact the review engineer to receive standard templates. a. The Applicant must provide a 25-foot wide perpetual public access trail easement through Lots 2A1 and 2A2 connecting the improved alley on the west boundary of Lot 2A2 through Lot 2A1 to Sacco Drive; and b. The Applicant must provide a 30-foot wide storm drain easement on Lot 2A2. 5. BMC 38.270.030. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant must submit plans and specifications for water and sewer main extensions, streets, and storm water improvements for Lot 2A2which must beprepared and signed by a professional engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana, which must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Water and sewer plans must also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant must also provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of Mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. Building permits will not be issued prior to City acceptance of the site 26 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 12 of 27 infrastructure improvements unless all provisions set forth in Section 38.270.030.C of the Bozeman Municipal Code are met to allow for concurrent construction. 6. BMC 38.410.060.A. Easements. a. The final plat must provide all necessary easements and they must be described, dimensioned and shown on each subdivision block of the final plat in their true and correct location. The recorded easement number must be documented on the final plat. b. The Applicant is advised that all dedicated public easements must be recorded the City’s standard template easement documents separate from the plat and the recorded document number must be listed on the final plat. Easements will be deemed inadequate if they are not in a final draft format (signatures are not required for the draft review). Easements must be stamped by a licensed professional surveyor. In preparing signature blocks on any upcoming documents, please use the following names: Jeff Mihelich, City Manager; Mike Maas, City Clerk; Cynthia L. Andrus, Mayor. If a new member is established, the easement documents must be updated. c. Utility easements shall be provided in accordance with the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) and must be recorded prior to final plat approval. d. All Easements indicated below must be provided on city standard easements templates. Drafts must be prepared for review and approval by the city. Signed hard copies of the easements must be submitted to the city and recorded easement numbers must be shown on the final plat. The Applicant may contact the reviewing engineer to receive standard templates. i. The Applicant must provide the proposed ten foot utility easement (power, gas, communication, etc.) along the developments property frontage with Baxter Lane and Sacco Drive. ii. The Applicant must provide the proposed drainage easement for the proposed storm sewer crossing multiple lots. iii. The Applicant must provide the proposed pedestrian access (trail corridor) easement. This easement must be 25’ in width and provide a connection between public access points. iv. The Applicant must provide a public access easement over the existing mutual access easement along the western border of Lot 1A and Lot 2A2. This easement must extend along the western border of Lot 1A and at least 25 feet into proposed Lot 2A2 to meet lot access requirements. v. The division of Lot 2A into Lot 2A1 and 2A2 will create the proposed sewer service to lot 2A1 to cross lot lines. The Applicantmust provide a sewer service easement on Lot 2A2. This shall be a private easement. A recorded copy of the easement must be submitted and the recorded easement number shall be recorded on the Final Plat. 7. BMC 38.270.030,Completion of Improvements. If it is the developer’s intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be 27 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 13 of 27 entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the approved preliminary plat information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150 percent of the cost of the remaining improvements. 8. BMC 38.240.450.The Applicant is advised where public improvements are to be installed prior to Final plat Approval, the final plat of subdivision must contain a certificate of completion of public improvements. Prior to final plat approval, Sheet One certificatesmust list all completed and accepted improvements, if applicable. 9. BMC 38.240.530.When irrigation of public facilities are to be installed prior to final plat approval, the final plat of subdivision must contain a certificate of completion of water- related improvements. The certificate must list all completed and accepted improvements, including but not limited to all irrigation system record drawings. This certificate must be provided on the final plat. 10. BMC 38.240.420. If there are liens or mortgages against the property, the appropriate Mortgagee certificate must be included. 11.The following comments pertain to areas of the project that do not currently meet code and must be addressed prior to Final Plat. The following comments must be addressed with future applications: a.DSSP Plans and Specification Review Policy – Plans, specifications, and submittals for public infrastructure improvements (water main) must be submitted to the City Engineering Department (engsubmittals@bozeman.net) for infrastructure review. b. DSSP Fire Service Line Standard – Plans for all fire service lines must be submitted to the City Engineering Department (engsubmittals@bozeman.net) for review. c.DSSP V.A.7.a - All connections to an existing water main will begin with a new valve. d.DSSP V.B.12 - Access Roads: A 12'-wide all-weather gravel access road, with turn- arounds if needed, shall be constructed to provide access to all sanitary sewer manholes and water main valves not located within a paved public or private street or parking lot. A temporary access road shall be constructed if water main valves are to be located outside of the proposed parking lot. e. The provided geotechnical report suggests corrosivity concerns. The Applicantshall specify corrosion protection or provide an analysis based on the DIPRA Design Decision Model showing protection is not needed prior to infrastructure approval. SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS On November 23, 2021,and then again on January 24, 2023,the DRC determined that the application was adequate for continued review and found that application conforms to standards and is sufficient for approval with conditions and code provisions based on the staff analysis and findings described below in Section 6 of this report. 28 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 14 of 27 Public hearing date for the City Commission was held February 7, 2023 at 6:00 PM. SECTION 6 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, and plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis is a summary of the completed review. A. Criteria for City Commission Action, BMC Section 38.240.150.B, BMC. In considering applications for subdivision approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following criteria and findings of fact: 1.Compliance with the survey requirements of Part 4 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act. The preliminary plat has been prepared in accordance with the survey requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Montana. As outlined in Code Provision Number 1, the final plat must comply with State statute, Administrative Rules of Montana, and the Bozeman Municipal Code.A conditions of approval sheetmust be included with the final plat and updated with any additional required notations as required by Preliminary Plat conditions or code provisions 2. Compliance with the local subdivision regulations provided for in Part 5 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act. The final plat must comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). The Applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as a condition of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law.Sections 3 and 4 of this report identify conditions and code corrections necessary to meet all regulatory standards. Therefore, it is expected that upon satisfaction of all conditions and code corrections,the subdivision wouldcomply with local subdivision regulations. 3. Compliance with the local subdivision review procedures provided for in Part 6 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act. The application was initially-received on October 20, 2021 and was deemed inadequate for further review. Revised application materials were received on November 28/2022 and December 2, 2022. The City deemed the application adequate for review on January 24, 2023. Public notice for the application began January 24, 2023 for the February 7, 2023 City Commission public meeting. BMC 38.240.140.a.2 delegates review of all minor subdivisions from a tract of record to the Community Development Director. Based on the recommendation of the Development Review Committee (DRC) and other applicable review agencies, as well as any public testimony received on the matter, the Community Development Director forwards therecommendation inthisreport to the City Commission who will make the final decision on the Applicant’s request. 29 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 15 of 27 The final decision for a Minor Subsequent Subdivision Preliminary Plat with 5 or fewer lots must be made within 60 working days of the date it was deemed adequate for further review (January 24, 2023). Pursuant to BMC 38.240.100 the City Commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny the subdivision application by March 24, 2023 unless there is a written extension from the Applicant, not to exceed one year. Public notice for this application was given as described in Appendix B beginning on January 24, 2023. On January 24, 2023, this major subdivision staff report was completed and forwarded to the City Commission with a recommendation of conditional approval. Based on review of the Development Review Committee and the Department of Community Development all applicable regulations are met if all conditions and code requirements are satisfied. Pertinent code provisions and site specific requirements are included in this report for City Commission consideration in Sections 3 and 4. 4. Compliance with Chapter 38, BMC and other relevant regulations. Community Development staff and the DRC reviewed the preliminary plat against all applicable regulations and the application complies with the BMC and all other relevant regulations with conditions and code corrections. This report includes the Condition of Approval and required code provisions as recommended by the DRC for consideration by the City Commission to complete the application processing for final plat approval. With those conditions and code provisions met, all municipal water and sewer facilities would conform to the regulations outlined by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality and the requirements of the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. B. Documentation of compliance with adopted standards, 38.220.060 BMC. 1. Surface water.This proposed subsequent minor subdivision would utilize an existing detention pond serving both lots and located in the northeast corner of the subdivision. This pond would attenuate stormwater flows prior to discharging to the Walton’s Stream/Ditch. 2. Floodplains. There are no floodplains on the Site. 3. Groundwater. During the September 2021 investigation of the Site for the Home 2 Home hotel site plan, groundwater was encountered at a depth of 5.1 to 5.8 feet below grade. 4. Geology, Soils and Slopes. Beneath the 1-foot vegetative topsoil lie sandy lean clay soils with a high potential for compressibility. The site is relatively level and drains with sheet flor to the northwest. 5. Vegetation. In July 2019, the property consisted of an upland herbaceous community and a palustrine emergent wetland community. The upland herbaceous areas within the project were dominated by intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium, NI), Canada thistle (Circium arvense, FAC), stickywilly (Galiumaparine, FACU), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola, FACU), and hoary 30 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 16 of 27 alyssum (Berteroa incana, NI). The palustrine emergent wetland within the project area was dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), Canada thistle, fringed willow herb (Epilobium ciliatum, FACW), and common spikerush (Eleocharis palustris, OBL). Much of the property was infested with noxious weeds such as Canada thistle hoary alyssum. 6. Wildlife. A field survey of the Site was conducted in July 2019 by Ms. Christine Pearcy, Environmental Scientist for Morrison Maierle, representing the Applicant. Although Mallard ducks and Red-winged blackbirds were observed in the wetland and creek areas of the Site, Ms. Pearcy found that no impacts to federally-listed endangered, threatened, proposed or candidate species of wildlife are anticipated to occur as a result of development of this subdivision. 7. Agriculture. Due to development in the area, no agricultural practices have been performed on the property for several years. An October 2021 evaluation of the Site for agricultural resources by Ms. Christine Pearcy, Environmental Scientist, with Morrison Maierle for the Applicant revealed: “The subject property has historically been used for growing hay when the property to thesouth was also in agricultural use. The northeast corner of the subject property appeared to have a manmade drainage running through it. A review of historic aerial imagery obtained from Google Earth revealed that the subject property has been managed for agriculture from at least as far back as 1985. The property to the south was developed in 2006, removing much of the hay field that was historically harvested. The subject property appeared to no longer be used for hay production since that time, but rather just shredded for maintenance purposes. A review of the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s statewide land cover data indicates the land use on the subject property as “Pasture/Hay”. Current observed land-use on the subject property is vacant land that may get shredded/mowed occasionally for maintenance. The property does not appear to be used for any agricultural purposes at this time and is overgrown with noxious weeds. A site plan for a Home 2 Suites Hotel has been approved for the Lot 2A1 portion of the property.” 8. The effect on agricultural water user facilities.A similar evaluation by Ms. Pearcy revealed: “No agricultural water user facilities are currently located on the subject property. Since no agricultural water use facilities exist on the subject property, there will be no impact on these resources as a result of the project.” 9. Water/Sewer.Water and sewer systems exist to serve the subdivision. The approved hotel site plan for the new Lot 2A1 shows water and sanitary sewer service tothat Site. Furthermore, when development of Lot 2A2 is proposed, the developer would extend water and sewer mains to that lot. Code Provision 4 requires the Applicant to submit plans for water and sewer main extensions, approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, to be reviewed by the City. Code Provision 5 requires a City standard sewer easement where the sewer system is located. Building 31 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 17 of 27 permits would not be issued prior to City acceptance of site infrastructure improvements, unless concurrent construction is requested and conditions allow. Water rights exist for the subject property. The 2007 transfer of water rights for the “parent” subdivision COS 407 meets the City’s water adequacy code BMC 38.410.130 to offset water demands attributable to this subdivision. 10. Stormwater Management. The subdivision must construct storm water management and water quality facilities conforming to standards of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The maintenance of the stormwater facilities are the responsibility of the property owner of each lot or that of a Property Owners Association (POA) if a regional pond is to be used. Inspection of installed facilities prior to final plat would verify that standards have been met. This proposed subsequent minor subdivision will be utilizing this existing detention pond and therefore, groundwater monitoring is not necessary. 11. Streets, roads and alleys. The 2020 Bozeman Community Plan/Growth Policy and subdivision standards require adequate connectivity of a development to the street grid. Access to the new Lot 2A1 would be taken from Baxter Lane, a designated collector street. Legal and Physical Access. As noted above in Section 3 on page 9, Condition of Approval 1.b, the new Lot 2A2 is required to have legal and physical access from a public street or alley. The alternative method for providing such access is being proposed by the Applicant in which he would (1) record a public access easement along at least 25-feet of the Lot 2A2 frontage; (2) would improve that public access easement land to City alley standards; and (3) would provide a 25-feet wide perpetual public access easement within Lot 2A2 which would connect to the existing pedestrian easement on Lot 2A1 which connects to the Sacco Drive sidewalk. This alternate access would meet the standards of BMC 38.400.090.B.2.c. Walkability, Transit and Bikeability.The Community Plan/growth policy encourages development to be walkable, which is defined in the Plan’s Appendix F Glossary as: Walkable. A walkable area has: • A center, whether it’s a main street or a public space. • People: Enough people for businesses to flourish and for public transit to run frequently. • Parks and public space: Functional and pleasant public places to gather and play. • Pedestrian design: Buildings are close to the street, parking lots are relegated to the back. • Schools and workplaces: Close enough that walking to and from home to these destinations is realistic. • Complete streets: Streets designed for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit. The “parent” Lot 2A has a sidewalk along its Baxter Lane frontage and an approved hotel site plan would provide a sidewalk along its Sacco Drive frontage. The existing Lot 1A, which is developed with a credit union office building, extends a sidewalk to its southwestern boundary where the new Lot 2A2 would begin. The North 19th Trail is a paved shared use path with a segment lying along the 32 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 18 of 27 west boundary of both Lots 1A and the new Lot 2A2 and would remain. This shared use path also functions as a bike path which connects to an east-west bike lane along Baxter Lane. There is a Blue Line bus stop at N. 19th Avenue and Baxter Lane. With the complexity of features needed to create a walkable environment, no one site is likely to provide all the needed elements. According to the WalkScore.com algorithms, the site has a Walk Score of 38 out of 100 which denotes that the Site and area are car-dependent. It has a Transit score of 21 which denotes minimal transit service, and a Bike Score of 55, which denotes that the area is “bikeable”. Average walk score for the city as a whole is 48 out of 100.These values are provided by Walk Score, a private organization which presents information on real estate and transportation through walkscore.com. The algorithm which produces these numbers is proprietary. A score is not an indication of safety or continuity of services or routes. Scores are influenced by proximity of housing, transit, trails, commerce and services and expected ability, as determined by the algorithm, to meet basic needs without using a car. There are no adopted development standards relating to the walk score. A trip generation analysis was provided with the application in lieu of a traffic impact study and it found that the infrastructure that exists and is proposed for the project would service the development and no upgrades were proposed for any nearby intersections. 12. Non-municipal utilities.NorthWestern Energy would provide natural gas and electric service to the development. These facilities would be located in public utility easements along the roadways within the subdivision. Century Link and/or Charter Communications would provide cable, telephone, and fiber service to the development. These facilities would be located in public utility 33 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 19 of 27 easements along the roadways within the subdivision. The Preliminary Plat shows the location of the existing dry utilities near the proposed subdivision. 13. Land Use. The following table summarizes the proposed lots and land uses for this subdivision. 14.Parks and recreation facilities.This is a wholly commercial subdivision with no anticipated adverse impacts to area parks or recreation facilities. Parkland is not required for development within commercial developments. 15. Neighborhood Center. This is a two lot split of a commercially-zoned property. Pedestrian easements and corridors cross both lots. There is no anticipated impact to nearby neighborhood centers. 16. Lighting Plan. There is no lighting plan with this subdivision. A code-complying exterior lighting plan would be provided with any proposed development of either of the two new lots. The Home 2 Home hotel for Lot 2A has an approved lighting plan. 17. Miscellaneous. A. Easements. The provision of easements to and within the subdivision for the location and installation of any necessary utilities. Code Provision No. 6 requires all easements, existing and proposed,to be accurately depicted and addressed on the final plat and in the final plat application. Public utilities must be located within dedicated street right of ways. Utility easements need to be provided and granted with the final plat in accordance with public and private design standards. B. Legal and Physical Access. The provision of legal and physical access must be provided to each parcel within the subdivision per BMC Section 38.400.090.B.2.c. Condition of Approval Numbers 1.a, 1.b and 1.ca assures satisfaction of this code provision. Access to the new Lot 2A1 (currently Lot 2A) would be provided from a 30-foot wide public access and utility easement from Baxter Lane into the Site. This access easement is shared with the adjacent Lot 1A to the west which is developed with a financial institution office building. This access easement would remain for the new Lot 2A1. However, the splitting off of the land of Lot 2A2 from 34 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 20 of 27 the larger Lot 2A would remove legal and physical access to this lot because the remaining 20-foot wide “shared access easement” connecting this lot to Baxter Lane does not meet the standards for legal and physical access of BMC 37.400.090.B.2. Therefore, the conditions of Condition 1a, 1b and 1c must be met. Figure 8: Shared access easement to the new Lot 2A1 (formerly Lot 2A) 35 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 21 of 27 Figure 9: Access easements to the new Lot 2A2 per Condition No. 1 Section 38.400.090, Access, requires all lots to have legal and physical access to a public or approved private street or an approved alley and a greenway corridor or trail corridor with public access. Simmental Way terminates at the north side of Baxter Lane and there is no publicly-accessible right- of-way (ROW) road or alley on the south side of Baxter Lane that could provide access to the new Lot 2A2. There is an existing 20-feet and 10-feet wide “mutual access easement” to the current Lot 1A and the southwest portion of the current Lot 2A. This combined 30-feet wide mutual access easement along the western boundary of the new Lot 2A2 does not provide public access to that land. Subsection B.2.c requires “25-feet of frontage on an improved alley and a greenway corridor or trail corridor with public access. This option may require additional improvements to the alley to 20’ 36 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 22 of 27 accommodate emergency access, snow removal and storage, and the provision of utilities. The alley may also require signage for the provision of emergency services.” The 30-foot wide mutual access easement along the west side of the new Lot 2A2 could provide legal and physical access to that lot if (1) a perpetual public access easement were recorded on this land for a minimum of 25-feet frontage; and (2) this public access travelway improved to City alley standards connected to a perpetual publicly-accessible greenway corridor or trail corridor through both Lots 2A1 and 2A2 to Sacco Drive. Condition of Approval No. 1 would require (1)this legal and physical access to be properly shown and labeled on the final plat submittal; (2) a proper perpetual public access easement and maintenance agreement between the owner(s) of Lots 2A1 and 2A2 be recorded prior to final plat approval; and (3)an Improvement Plan for the public improvement to the western travelway to Lot 2A2 be approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. C.Educational Facilities. This is a wholly commercial subdivision with no school impacts. D. Police/Fire Services.The area of the subdivision is within the service area of both these departments. No concerns regarding service availability have been identified. E. Parklands.As this is a wholly commercial subdivision, no parklands are required per BMC 38.420.010. F.The effect on the natural environment.A field survey of the Site was conducted in July 2019 by Ms. Christine Pearcy, Environmental Scientist for Morrison Maierle, representing the Applicant. Although Mallard ducks and Red-winged blackbirds were observed in the wetland and creek areas of the Site, Ms. Pearcy found that no impacts to federally-listed endangered,threatened, proposed or candidate species of wildlife are anticipated to occur as a result of development of this subdivision. Figure 9:Wetland areas of the Lot 2A2 hotel site. In July 2019, the property consisted of an upland herbaceous community and a palustrine emergent wetland community. The upland herbaceous areas within the project were dominated by 37 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 23 of 27 intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium, NI), Canada thistle (Circium arvense, FAC), stickywilly (Galium aparine, FACU), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola, FACU), and hoary alyssum (Berteroa incana, NI). The palustrine emergent wetland within the project area was dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), Canada thistle, fringed willow herb (Epilobium ciliatum, FACW), and common spikerush (Eleocharis palustris, OBL). Much of the property was infested with noxious weeds such as Canada thistle hoary alyssum. The site is in a potential area of high groundwater which may negatively impact future structures or cause illicit discharges into the sanitary sewer and over burden the surface drainage system. Condition No. 12(b) prohibits crawl spaces or basement without first consulting a professional engineer certified in the State of Montana who would certify that groundwater would not harm these structures. This requirement will protect both future structure owners from future hazards of flooding and lessen burdens on the public from illicit discharges. BMC 38.550.070 requires use of wells or surface water rights to irrigate parks and open spaces rather than municipal water supply. The development would irrigate common areas and ROW boulevard strip landscaping with wells. A wetlands delineation study was conducted for the Site in 2019 for the hotel site plan which revealed two wetland areas on that Site. However, according to that study, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service maintains the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), which serves as a publicly available resource that provides detailed information on the abundance, characteristics, and distribution of U.S. wetlands. According to the NWI database, no features are located within the hotel site (USFWS 2019). One emergent wetland feature was located on the adjacent property to the east. G.The effect on public health and safety. With the recommended conditions of approval and required plat corrections, the subdivision is not expected to adversely impact public health and safety. The intent of the regulations in Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) is to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. The subdivision has been reviewed by the DRC which has determined that it is in general compliance with the BMC standards with recommended conditions and code provisions. Conditions deemed necessary to ensure compliance have been noted throughout this staff report. Code provision No.1 requires full compliance with all applicable BMC code requirements. All subdivisions must be reviewed against the following criteria listed in 76-3-608.3.b-d, Montana Code Annotated (MCA) and as a result, the Department of Community Development has reviewed this application against the listed criteria and further provides the following summary from Applicant submittal materials and requirements. It is noted that all infrastructure would meet City standards. 18. Affordable Housing. This is a wholly commercial subdivision and the affordable housing provisions of the BMC do not apply. 19. How the proposed subdivision advances the adopted growth Policy. 38 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 24 of 27 SECTION 7 – FINDINGS OF FACT, ORDER AND APPEAL PROVISIONS A.PURSUANT to Chapter 38, Article 3, BMC, and other applicable sections of Chapter 38, BMC, public notice was given, opportunity to submit comment was provided to affected parties, and a review of the preliminary plat described in these findings of fact was conducted. B.The purposes of the preliminary plat review were to consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety, welfare, and the other purposes of Chapter 38, BMC; to evaluate the proposal against the criteria and standards of Chapter 38 BMC, BMC; and to determine whether the plat should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. C.The matter of the preliminary plat application was considered by the City Commission at a public hearing on February 7, 2023 at which time the Department of Community Development Staff reviewed the project, submitted and summarized recommended conditions of approval, and summarized the public comment submitted to the City prior to the public hearing. D.The Applicant acknowledged understanding and agreement with the recommended conditions of approval, code provisions. E.The City Commission requested public comment at the public hearing on February 7, 2023 and no one sought to offer comment. F.It appeared to the City Commission that all parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed preliminary plat and offer comment were given the opportunity to do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory bodies established by Article 38.210, BMC, and considering all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment period defined by Chapter 38, BMC, the City Commission has found that the proposed preliminary plat would comply with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code if certain conditions were imposed. Therefore, being fully advised of all matters having come before her regarding this application, the City Commission makes the following decision. G.The preliminary plat has been found to meet the criteria of Chapter 38, BMC, and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listed in Section 3 of this report and the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the Chapter including those identified in Section 4 of this report. The evidence contained in the submittal materials, advisory body review, public testimony, and this report, justify the conditions imposed on this development to ensure that the final site plan and subsequent construction complies with all applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Chapter 38, BMC. H.This City Commission order may be appealed by bringing an action in the Eighteenth District Court of Gallatin County, within 30 days after the adoption of this document by the City Commission, by following the procedures of Section 76-3-625, MCA. The preliminary approval of this subdivision shall be effective for three (3) years from the date of the signed Findings of Fact and Order approval. At the end of this period the City may, at the request of the subdivider, grant an extension to its approval for a period of mutually agreed upon time. 39 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 25 of 27 DATED this ________ day of _____________________, 2023 BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION _________________________________ CYNTHIA L. ANDRUS Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Mike Maas City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 40 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 26 of 27 APPENDIX A -- PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY The intent of the B-2 Community business district is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterial streets. Multi-household dwellings, townhouses, and apartments are allowed as a secondary use due to their complementary nature and ability to enhance the walkability of these districts. Design standards emphasizing pedestrian oriented design are important elements of this district. Use of this zone is appropriate for arterial corridors, commercial nodes, and/or areas served by transit. The intent of the 2005 Saccoccia/Lowe’s PUD (Project No. Z-05128) was to allow a multi-phased and multi-commercial development that allowed all uses permitted in the M-1, Light Industrial and B-2, Commercial Business districts; that allowed building heights up to 48 feet; to allow concurrent construction of infrastructure improvements; to relax the pole sign standards and exterior light fixture standardsof the Bozeman Municipal Code; and to allow Lowe’s store to exceed the 75,000 sq. ft. maximum by 90,765 sq.ft. Staff Comment: The proposed division of the 5.53-acre Lot 2A into two lots would allow the owner to develop the portion of the lot that the Home 2 Home hotel developer does not wish to use. This western 2.04-acres would become a buildable commercial lot once legal and physical access and public improvements are provided to the new Lot 2A2. This would facilitate development of a commercial “in-fill” site; one that does not rely on visibility from a public street. Adopted Growth Policy Designation:The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan designates the subject property to develop as “Community Commercial Mixed Use”. Theme 6: A City powered by its creative, innovative, and entrepreneurial economy. EE-1.1: Support the goals and objectives outlined in the Bozeman Economic Development Strategy. Bozeman Economic Development Strategy Update, 2016. The City of Bozeman has established a solid approach to economic development with its current strategy that is based on the three economic development pillar strategies below. 1. Business Growth: Support retention and growth of existing businesses, while welcoming and encouraging new businesses. 2. Infrastructure: Invest in infrastructure as a mechanism to drive economic development. 3. Workforce: Support education and workforce development initiatives to provide businesses with qualified workers. Strong Economic Base Increase middle and high wage traded sector employment and diversify the economic base by supporting existing businesses and strategically growing the local supply chain. Support local sector businesses with a seamless permitting process and awareness about existing small business programs. Invest in infrastructure projects identified on the capital improvement plan (CIP) that the business community needs and wants by leveraging the City’s proactive culture to foster 41 City Commission Finding of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Preliminary Plat of Minor Subsequent Subdivision of Lot 2A of the Corrected Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision 407C of Lots 1 and 2 of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 Page 27 of 27 collaboration across departments and commitments to identified projects. Strong Community Protect the outdoor environment by guiding efficient industry site development within the City limits. Foster an environmentally and economically sustainable community with an active transportation network (transit networks, bicycle routes, trails, and sidewalks) that employers and employees desire. Offset livability costs for citizens with conscious infrastructure and workforce investments that improve access to job opportunities with the understanding that several other stakeholders are focused specifically on affordable housing. Staff Comment: The creation of a new, small commercial lot would facilitate in-fill development for a small business that is not reliant on street visibility yet may benefit from the proximity to pedestrian trails and a hotel business. APPENDIX B – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the City Commission public meeting. Pursuant to BMC 38.220.420, notice was provided by posting the site, mailing by certified mail to the Applicant and adjacent property owners and by first class mail to all other owners within 200 feeton January 24, 2023.Content of the notice contained all elements required by Article 38.220., BMC. No public comment has been received at the time of the writing of this staff report. APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION Owner/Applicant: Saccoccia Lands II, LLC, 1234 Springhill Road, Belgrade, MT 59714 Representative: Matt Ekstrom of Morrison Maierle, Inc., engineers Staff Report By:Susana Montana, Senior Planner. Staff Engineer:Karl Johnson, PE ATTACHMENT LINK The full application and file of record can be viewed digitally at: https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?startid=258204&cr=1 Find the property on the map and click on the parcel. Select the “Project Documents Folder” link and navigate to the Preliminary Plat application #21430. You may also view the application at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. 42 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Cody Flammond, Engineer II Lance Lehigh, Interim City Engineer SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Notice of Award to Landfill Drilling and Piping, Inc. for Construction of the 2023 LFG and Leachate/Condensate System Improvements Project MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Notice of Award to Landfill Drilling and Piping, Inc. for the total schedule Pay Items 1 through 10 in the amount of $274,340.00. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for existing and new infrastructure. BACKGROUND:Attached is a copy of the Notice of Award for the above referenced project. The project generally includes: installation of three landfill gas (LFG) wells, providing and installing buried piping for transmission of LFG to the existing gas handling system, and providing and installing buried piping for transmission of leachate/condensate. The purpose of this work is to collect and handle additional LFG at the landfill and reduce the operating costs associated with pumping the existing underground storage tank. This project was bid as a combination of SW69 and SW70, approved in the FY23 budget and funded at $304,000. The contract is to be completed within 90 calendar days of the issuance of the notice to proceed. Bids for the above-referenced project were opened on February 8th with 3 bids being submitted. The low bid was submitted by Landfill Drilling and Piping, Inc. in the amount of $274,340.00 for the base bid. The Bid Tabulation for the project is attached. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:This project will be paid for with approved funding from the Landfill Post- Closure fund. 43 Attachments: Bid Sheet - 2023 LFG Leachate Condensate System Improvements Notice of Award Report compiled on: February 16, 2023 44 NAME & ADDRESS Contractor License #Bid Price SC5 Field Servicees/ SC5 Engineers 11260 Roger Bacon Dr Ste 300 Reston VA 20190 221479 Yes yes $ 376,735.00 Landfill Drilling & Piping Inc 772 Lois Dr Sun Prairie, WI 53590 Yes Yes 274,340.00$ Western Municipal Construction Inc 5855 Elysian Rd Billings 59101- 6320 425,611.00$ Mike Maas Cody Flammond City Clerk Engineer Bid Check:Delivered to Finance:Accepted By:Date: 1 2 3 4 City of Bozeman BID - 2023 LFG and Leachate/Condensate System Improvements NON- DISCRIMINATION BID BOND Yes Yes DocuSign Envelope ID: 5DE218E7-85D9-4ACF-B106-F2DE81C26BA3 45 NOTICE OF AWARD Dated: __________________________ TO: Landfill Drilling and Piping, Inc. ADDRESS: 772 Lois Drive, Sun Prairie, Wisconsin 53590 PROJECT: 2023 LFG and Leachate/Condensate System Improvements CONTRACT FOR: Landfill Gas Drilling and Field Construction You are notified that your Bid dated February 8th, 2023, for the above Contract has been considered. You are the apparent Successful Bidder and have been awarded a Contract for installing three landfill gas wells, providing and installing buried piping for transmission of landfill gas to the existing gas handling system, and providing and installing buried pipeline for transmission of leachate/condensate. The Contract Price of your Contract is: Two Hundred Seventy Four Thousand Three Hundred Forty Dollars ($274,340). Three copies of the proposed Contract Documents accompany this Notice of Award. You must comply with the following conditions precedent within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Notice of Award, that is, by _______ . 1. You must deliver to the OWNER 3 fully executed counterparts of the Agreement including all the Contract Documents and Drawings. 2. You must deliver with the executed Agreement the Contract Security (Bonds) as specified in the Instruction to Bidders (page 6), General Conditions (paragraph 5.01) and Supplementary Conditions (paragraph SC-5.02). 3. List other conditions precedent: You must deliver with the executed Agreement the Certificates of Insurance as specified in the General Conditions (paragraph 5.03) and Supplementary Conditions (paragraph SC-5.04). Failure to comply with these conditions within the time specified will entitle OWNER to consider your Bid abandoned, to annul this Notice of Award, and to declare your Bid Security forfeited. Within ten (10) days after you comply with these conditions, OWNER will return to you one fully signed counterpart of the Agreement with the Contract Documents attached. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA ATTEST: BY: __________________________________ BY: ____________________________ (CITY MANAGER) (CITY CLERK) DATE: _______________________________ 46 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Jon Henderson, Strategic Services Director SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Agreement Accepting a Donation in the Amount of $1,000,000 from the Bozeman Public Library Foundation for the Second Installment for Construction Services for the Bozeman Public Library Renovation Project MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Agency/Non-profit RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Agreement Accepting a Donation in the Amount of $1,000,000 from the Bozeman Public Library Foundation for the Second Installment for Construction Services for the Bozeman Public Library Renovation Project. STRATEGIC PLAN:5.1 Civic and Cultural Infrastructure: Expand Bozeman's civic and cultural "infrastructure" as the city grows. BACKGROUND:This Letter of Agreement confirms the understanding reached by all parties and sets forth the terms and conditions of a contribution by the Bozeman Public Library Foundation to the City of Bozeman for the second installment for construction services for the Bozeman Public Library Renovation project. Details of the project and the specific responsibilities of each party are outlined in the Agreement between the Bozeman Public Library, the Bozeman Public Library Foundation, and the City of Bozeman signed and executed on August 17, 2021. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As directed by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:Current project estimates total $5,677,534.00 to include all phases of pre- construction and construction services. To date, the Library Foundation has provided funding to the City totaling $2,710,671.83, and the City has committed $437,000.00 in support of the project through the Library Depreciation Fund. This Agreement accepts $1,000,000.00 to be allocated in support of construction services. A subsequent Agreement and transfer of additional funds necessary to complete the project will be necessary before completion of the project. 47 Attachments: Bozeman Public Library Expansion Project - Second Installment for Construction Services - Letter of Agreement.pdf Report compiled on: February 15, 2023 48 Letter of Agreement February 28, 2023 RE: Installment for Construction Services for the Bozeman Public Library Expansion— Letter of Agreement This letter of agreement (the “Agreement”) confirms the understanding reached by the parties and sets forth the terms and conditions of a contribution by the Bozeman Public Library Foundation (“BPLF”) to the City of Bozeman (“City”) for the second installment for Construction Services for the Bozeman Public Library Expansion. 1. Parties to the Agreement and Notices: a. For BPLF Contact: Janay Johnson, Director Address: 626 East Main; Bozeman MT 59715 b. For City of Bozeman Contact: Cyndy Andrus, Mayor Address: 121 N. Rouse Ave; Bozeman MT 59715 2. Background: Details of the project and the specific responsibilities of each party are outlined in the Agreement between the Bozeman Public Library, the Bozeman Public Library Foundation, and the City of Bozeman signed and executed on August 17, 2021. Current project estimates total $5,677,534.00 to include all phases of pre-construction and construction services. To date, the Library Foundation has provided funding to the City totaling $2,710,671.83, and the City has committed $437,000.00 in support of the project through the Library Depreciation Fund. This Agreement accepts $1,000,000.00 to be allocated in support of construction services. A subsequent Agreement and transfer of additional funds necessary to complete the project will be necessary before completion of the project. 3. BPLF Responsibilities: a. Perform a wire transfer in the amount of $1,000,000.00 payable to the City no later than April 15, 2023. 4. City of Bozeman Responsibilities: a. Utilize the funds exclusively for Construction Services for the Library Expansion Project. 49 b. Return any unused funds to BPLF at the completion of Construction Services. c. Highlight BPLF’s funding and involvement in the project in press releases or other promotional activities. 5. Acceptance: By signing below, the undersigned represent that they are authorized to act on behalf of their respective parties and to bind their respective parties to the terms of this Agreement, and that the undersigned parties have read, understand and agree to the above. Bozeman Public Library Foundation: Signed: ____________________________ Janay Johnson, Director Date: ______________________________ City of Bozeman: Signed: _____________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Date: _______________________________ 50 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Jon Henderson, Strategic Services Director SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Agreement Accepting a Donation in the Amount of $56,250 from the Bozeman Public Library Foundation for Public Engagement and Concept Design Services for the Bozeman Community Center Project MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Agency/Non-profit RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Agreement Accepting a Donation in the Amount of $56,250 from the Bozeman Public Library Foundation for Public Engagement and Concept Design Services for the Bozeman Community Center Project. STRATEGIC PLAN:5.1 Civic and Cultural Infrastructure: Expand Bozeman's civic and cultural "infrastructure" as the city grows. BACKGROUND:On September 13, 2022 the City Commission approved a contract with ThinkOne and Anderson Mason Dale Architects for services related to community engagement and conceptual design for the Bozeman Community Center. Public engagement is currently underway, with concept design deliverables to be completed by May 15, 2023 and a cost model completed by June 12, 2023. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As directed by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:The Bozeman Public Library Foundation has approved $56,250 in funding to support the scope of services included in this effort. Attachments: Bozeman Community Center Project - Public Engagement and Concept Design Services - Letter of Agreement.pdf Report compiled on: February 15, 2023 51 Letter of Agreement February 28, 2023 RE: Installment for Public Engagement and Concept Design Services for the Bozeman Community Center Project—Letter of Agreement This letter of agreement (the “Agreement”) confirms the understanding reached by the parties and sets forth the terms and conditions of a contribution by the Bozeman Public Library Foundation (“BPLF”) to the City of Bozeman (“City”) for public engagement and concept design services for the Bozeman Community Center Project. 1. Parties to the Agreement and Notices: a. For BPLF Contact: Janay Johnson, Director Address: 626 East Main; Bozeman MT 59715 b. For City of Bozeman Contact: Cyndy Andrus, Mayor Address: 121 N. Rouse Ave; Bozeman MT 59715 2. Background: On September 13, 2022 the City Commission approved a contract with ThinkOne and Anderson Mason Dale Architects for services related to community engagement and conceptual design for the Bozeman Community Center. The Bozeman Public Library Foundation has approved $56,250 in funding to support the scope of services included in this effort. Public engagement is currently underway, with concept design deliverables to be completed by May 15, 2023 and a cost model completed by June 12, 2023. 3. BPLF Responsibilities: a. Perform a wire transfer in the amount of $56,250.00 payable to the City no later than April 15, 2023. 4. City of Bozeman Responsibilities: a. Utilize the funds exclusively for Public Engagement and Concept Design Services for the Bozeman Community Center Project. 5. Acceptance: 52 By signing below, the undersigned represent that they are authorized to act on behalf of their respective parties and to bind their respective parties to the terms of this Agreement, and that the undersigned parties have read, understand and agree to the above. Bozeman Public Library Foundation: Signed: ____________________________ Janay Johnson, Director Date: ______________________________ City of Bozeman: Signed: _____________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Date: _______________________________ 53 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Jim Veltkamp, Chief of Police SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager and Chief of Police to Sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Missouri River Drug Task Force for Fiscal Years 2024 and 2025 MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Agency/Non-profit RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager and Chief of Police to sign Memorandum of Understanding with the Missouri River Drug Task Force for Fiscal Years 2024 and 2025. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.3 Public Agencies Collaboration: Foster successful collaboration with other public agencies and build on these successes. BACKGROUND: The City of Bozeman has been a member of the Missouri River Drug Task Force (MRDTF) since 1990. The Bozeman Police Department currently has two officers assigned as full-time MRDTF detectives. The mission of the MRDTF is “to provide a collaborative federal, state and local law enforcement approach to identify, target and address those involved in drug trafficking, manufacture and/or violence.” The MRDTF utilizes sophisticated long-term investigative approaches, including undercover surveillance operations, the purchase of evidence and information, and electronic surveillance to disrupt and dismantle targeted drug trafficking and manufacturing organizations. The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is to establish general guidelines and operational procedures for this multi-agency task force. Agencies participating in this project recognize that combating drugs is of paramount importance to the safety of our communities. Through a united effort, resources are utilized more efficiently and investigative efforts are more productive. Participating agencies are committed to working cooperatively and fully sharing information. Members include: City of Bozeman; City of Helena; City of East Helena; City of Belgrade; Broadwater County; Gallatin County; Lewis & Clark County; Madison County; Park 54 County; City of Livingston; City of West Yellowstone; Montana State University; Sweet Grass County and Meagher County. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As recommended by the Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:Participation in MRDTF allows for grant opportunities that pay partial salaries for the two Bozeman police officers. There are many opportunities for shared training and equipment that would otherwise be cost prohibitive to the City of Bozeman. In addition, the forfeiture of seized money, vehicles or items as part of drug interdiction efforts are used to augment local operations. Attachments: Memorandum Of Understanding with the Missouri River Drug Task Force for Fiscal Years 2024 and 2025.pdf Report compiled on: February 9, 2023 55 2 MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FY 2024 – FY 2025 Purpose The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding is to establish general guidelines and operational procedures for a multi-agency Task Force to address drug-related crime. Through the spirit of cooperative efforts, and a strong commitment to combat drug-related trafficking, manufacturing, and violence, the MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE was formed in 1990. Agencies participating in this project recognize that combating drugs is of paramount importance to our communities. Through our united efforts, our resources will be better utilized and our investigative efforts will be more fruitful on behalf of the communities we serve. The participating agencies are committed to cooperative efforts and full information sharing through their participation in the MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE. Mission Statement The mission of the MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE is to provide a collaborative federal, state and local law enforcement effort to identify, target and address those involved in drug trafficking, manufacture and/or violence. The MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE will utilize sophisticated long-term investigative approaches, including undercover surveillance operations, the purchase of evidence and information, and electronic surveillance to disrupt and dismantle targeted drug organizations. 56 3 MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FY 2024 – FY 2025 This agreement is entered into January 26, 2023 among the following local government jurisdictions: City of Belgrade; City of Bozeman; City of East Helena; City of Helena; City of Livingston; City of West Yellowstone; Broadwater County; Gallatin County; Lewis & Clark County; Madison County; Meagher County; Park County; Sweet Grass County; and Montana State University at Bozeman. No new entity is created by reason of this Agreement. Whereas, there is evidence of drug trafficking, manufacturing, and drug-related violence in the above-described jurisdictions, and that such illegal activity has a substantial and detrimental effect on the health and general welfare of the people residing in these jurisdictions, the parties hereto agree to the following: 1. The Missouri River Drug Task Force (MRDTF) will perform the activities and duties described below: A. Disrupt the illicit drug traffic in above jurisdictions by immobilizing targeted violators and trafficking organizations, by; B. Gather and report intelligence data relating to trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs; C. Conduct undercover operations where appropriate and engage in other traditional methods of investigation, developing probable cause for issuance of warrants for search and seizure, and arrests, in order that the Task Force's activities will result in effective and successful prosecution before the courts of Montana. 2. To accomplish the objectives of the MRDTF, the Gallatin County Sheriff’s Office agrees to provide one (1) commander, two (2) deputies and an administrative assistant, the Bozeman Police Department agrees to provide two (2) police officers, the Lewis & Clark County Sheriff’s Office agrees to provide two (2) deputies, the Helena Police Department agrees to provide one (1) police officer, and the City of Livingston and the Park County Sheriff’s Office agree to provide one (1) deputy. Montana State University at Bozeman agrees to provide one (1) police officer. Lewis & Clark County Attorney's Office agrees to provide one (1) administrative assistant who will be an employee of Lewis & Clark County with wages and benefits to be paid for by the RMHIDTA grant, subject to the same constraints. The County Attorney Offices of the participating 57 4 counties agree to assist the MRDTF by providing legal advice, drafting search warrants and investigative subpoenas, prosecuting drug offenders, and prosecuting drug forfeiture actions. Broadwater County agrees to submit intelligence of drug activity within their county, and if possible, manpower as needed. Madison County agrees to provide, intelligence of drug activity within their county, and if possible, manpower as needed. Meagher County agrees to submit intelligence of drug activity within their county, and if possible, manpower as needed. Sweet Grass County agrees to submit intelligence of drug activity within their county, and if possible, manpower as needed. The City of Belgrade agrees to submit intelligence of drug activity within their city, and if possible, manpower as needed. The City of East Helena agrees to submit intelligence of drug activity within their city, and if possible, manpower as needed. The City of West Yellowstone agrees to submit intelligence of drug activity within their city, and if possible, manpower as needed. 3. The officers assigned to the MRDTF shall adhere to standard law enforcement policies and procedures as approved by the Board and those policies and procedures in effect in each member's respective agency. Failure to adhere to policies and procedures shall be grounds for dismissal from the MRDTF. MRDTF officers shall remain subject to the policies, procedures, and regulations of their parent agencies. The Executive Board will resolve any operational conflict between MRDTF policies and procedures and those of a parent agency. MRDTF policies and procedures will be adopted and used by all MRDTF members relative to drug operations and informant handling. For grant purposes only, the MRDTF Board of Directors will take administrative financial conflicts under consideration; however, any conflicts must be resolved to the satisfaction of Gallatin County. 58 5 4. Law enforcement officers assigned to the MRDTF by participating agencies (except state agents) shall be deputized in each participating jurisdiction in a manner allowed by law. 5. To accomplish objectives and provide an organizational leadership structure to the MRDTF, Gallatin County will assign one (1) Commander, one (1) Operations Sergeant and one (1) administrative assistant for the Bozeman Office. Lewis and Clark County will assign one (1) Operations Sergeant for the Helena Office. 6. Each participating agency is responsible for establishing and paying the salary and benefits, including overtime, of their respective officer(s) assigned to the MRDTF. MRDTF agencies must bill the MRDTF Commander on a quarterly basis no later than the second of each month following the end of each quarter. Any erroneous billing submitted and found to be in error will be returned to the agency that submitted the billing for correction and resubmission. 7. Gallatin County agrees to perform the duties of lead agency and will maintain all programmatic and financial records of the MRDTF, except for financial records of the joint MRDTF forfeiture accounts. Gallatin County will make all quarterly reports to the Board of Crime Control, and will submit relevant intelligence to the appropriate State and Federal agencies. Lewis and Clark County agrees to maintain all records of the Drug Forfeiture Fund (identified as Fund 241) and Equitable Sharing Fund (identified as Fund 242). 8. The MRDTF shall maintain, on a current basis, completed and accurate records and accounts of all obligations and expenditures of funds under this Agreement in accordance with specific accounting principles and instructions provided by the Department of Justice and the Montana Board of Crime Control to facilitate inspection and auditing of such records and accounts. 9. The MRDTF shall permit and have readily available for examination and auditing by the State, the Department of Justice and their duly authorized agents and representatives, any and all records, documents, accounts, invoices and receipts of expenditures relating to this Agreement. Therefore, records must be maintained by MRDTF, which will continue to exist until all audits and examinations are completed and resolved, or for a period of three (3) years after termination of this Agreement. 10. The lead agency will negotiate an indirect cost on an annual basis for the administration of this grant award. The indirect cost will be negotiated and determined prior to the submission of the grant applications. 59 6 11. An Executive Board shall be established. Its voting members shall be as follows: the Chief of Helena Police Department; the Chief of Bozeman Police Department; the Chief of West Yellowstone Police Department; the Chief of Livingston Police Department; the Chief of Belgrade Police Department; the Chief of East Helena Police Department, the Sheriff and the County Attorney of Gallatin County; the Sheriff and the County Attorney of Lewis & Clark County; the Sheriff and County Attorney of Broadwater County; the Sheriff and County Attorney of Madison County; the Sheriff and County Attorney of Park County, the Sheriff and County Attorney of Meagher County, the Sheriff and County Attorney of Sweet Grass County, and the Chief of MSU-Bozeman Police Department. The members of the Executive Board may designate persons from their agencies to represent the members during Executive Board meetings. The Executive Board shall have the following authority: to select a Chair and Vice Chair; to regulate and manage the MRDTF; to appoint the Task Force Commander and to designate a supervisor in the extended absence of the Task Force Commander; to establish subcommittees of the Board to conduct business; and to resolve disputes arising from MRDTF operations. The Chairperson will be the Task Force Commander’s primary contact with the Board on day-to-day issues and will bring to the Board’s attention any matters which would require a consensus of the Board prior to a regularly scheduled quarterly meeting. The Chairperson shall also preside over the Board meetings and is responsible for the formulation of minutes for the meetings and notification of Board members of upcoming meetings. The Chairperson shall be a local law enforcement member associated with the local drug task force. The tenure of the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall be reviewed at the end of each calendar year. The vice-chairperson shall conduct the same business in the absence of the chairperson. A. The Executive Board shall meet at least quarterly or as convened by the Chair or Vice Chair to receive reports relative to the progress, functions, and special duties accomplished by the Task Force. B. A quorum of the Executive Board is needed to conduct business. Seven Executive Board members, or their designees, shall constitute a quorum. In meetings where a quorum is established, matters coming before the Executive Board may be approved by a majority vote of the members in attendance at a meeting. C. Agendas and Minutes. The Task Force Commander and the Executive Board Chair are responsible to see that agendas are prepared and 60 7 distributed far enough in advance of meetings to ensure adequate preparation and participation in agenda items. The Task Force Commander and the Executive Board Chair are responsible to see that accurate and complete minutes are taken of each executive board meeting. Separate executive minutes may be taken for discussion of active and ongoing investigations. 12. Assets seized during Task Force investigations shall be shared as follows: A. Assets, for the purposes of this agreement, shall include all items of value seized relative to a case and all court ordered fines or contributions to the drug fund. The Board of Directors shall appoint two "Drug Fund Managers" who shall have the authority to expend monies from the Drug Fund as designated by the Board of Directors. This authority shall be written. The Drug Fund Managers must be Board members and may not be a Task Force Agent. B. Expenditure Authority: Expenditures over $1,000 up to and including $2,000 must have the approval of the Task Force Commander. Expenditures over $2,000 and less than $10,000 must have the approval of the Drug Fund Managers. Expenditures over $10,000 must be approved by motion made and carried during a meeting of the Board of Directors. Payments to any cooperative citizen shall not exceed $5,000 in any fiscal year. C. Felony Cases: Where any Task Force member has participated in the investigation, all monies and assets from cases filed in state and federal district court, including all civil forfeiture cases and cases where felony charges are reduced to misdemeanor charges, shall be deposited into the Drug Forfeiture Fund, “Fund 241.” D. Misdemeanor Cases: All assets from misdemeanor cases that are handled through "Justice of the Peace" or "City Court" shall remain with the local jurisdiction and are not required to be deposited to the MRDTF Drug Forfeiture Fund. 61 8 13. Forfeiture and Equitable Sharing Funds: A. Missouri River Drug Task Force Forfeiture Fund shall be maintained by Lewis and Clark County as a part of the Lewis and Clark County Finance System. The Drug Forfeiture Fund is identified as, "Fund 241." B. Missouri River Drug Task Force Equitable Sharing Fund shall be maintained by Lewis and Clark County, and is identified as, "Fund 242." These funds, as identified by generally accepted accounting procedures, are "Special Revenue Funds." 14. Distribution of Task Force Forfeiture and Equitable Sharing Funds: Participants in the MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE agree that assets forfeited and received by MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE will be utilized primarily for the continued funding of the MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE (Byrne Funded Task Force). Upon request of any individual agency the Board may reimburse an agency for expenditures related to Task Force business. The Board of Directors will function as the Seizure Board for Missouri River Drug Task Force. Any expenditure of forfeited MRDTF funds requires approval by a majority of the Board of Directors. MRDTF will comply with the U.S. Department of Justice's requirements for the equitable sharing of federally forfeited property for state and local law enforcement agencies. The Task Force Commander shall make recommendations to the Board regarding the extent to which forfeited funds should be shared with outside agencies participating in case investigations. 15. Drug Fund Financial Reporting: The Drug Fund Managers shall provide a financial report to the Board of Directors at the quarterly meetings. The report shall become a part of the meeting minutes. The minimum requirement of the report is: 1. Balance of the fund at the beginning of the quarter. 2. Total deposits to the fund during the quarter. 3. Total expended from the fund and an itemization of the expenditures. 62 9 4. Balance for the fund at the end of the quarter. 16. Pending Asset Forfeiture Report: Each participating jurisdiction agrees to provide the Task Force Commander with relevant information on asset forfeiture cases and cases with dispositions pending. In the event that the Byrne Memorial Grant is unable to fund the MISSOURI RIVER DRUG TASK FORCE, funds acquired through forfeitures in Forfeiture Fund 241 and Equitable Sharing Fund 242 will be used as allowable for the continuation of the Task Force as set forth in Section 14. If the Byrne Memorial Grant funding can no longer support the MRDTF and the MRDTF is unable to function due to the lack of funding, The Board of Directors will decide to liquidate the assets of Forfeiture Fund 241 based on a formula of each agency's financial participation in the MRDTF grant. Consistent with the OMB Uniform Administrative Guidance relating to the Equitable Sharing Program in effect as of July 2018, Equitable Sharing funds shall be paid to the Lewis and Clark County Sheriff’s Office as the MRDTF Fiduciary Agent for deposit into Fund 242 and the funds shall thereafter remain with Lewis and Clark County which shall be responsible for submitting one sharing request on behalf of MRDTF to include the total hours and activities of all MRDTF member agencies. Lewis and Clark County shall maintain and report Equitable Sharing funds with its own funds and shall not maintain a secondary account. Lewis and Clark County shall not transfer Equitable Sharing funds to other member agencies, but as directed by the MRDTF Board, it shall earmark funds for permissible expenditures in support of MRDTF operations as allowed by the OMB policies. As required by these polices, equipment purchased with Equitable Sharing funds shall be inventoried and remain the property of the Lewis and Clark County Sheriff Office. 17. Damage to private property. It will be the duty of the Task Force Commander to ensure that written operations plans are used. This includes, but is not limited to: drug buys, search warrants, and high-risk arrest warrants. If there is a possibility of damage to private property during these activities, the head law enforcement officer (or his/her designee) of the jurisdiction in which the activity is to occur will be required to approve the proposed operation. Upon approval, this jurisdiction will accept responsibility for damages up to a maximum of $250.00. Any amount over $250.00 will be paid out of the MRDTF Drug Forfeiture Fund. 63 10 18. The participating agencies agree to supply their assigned officer(s) with equipment necessary in carrying out MRDTF objectives including a radio- equipped automobile. Upon termination of the MRDTF, equipment that was initially supplied to the MRDTF by participating agencies shall be returned to said agency. Equipment shared jointly by all participating MRDTF agencies shall be split equally upon termination of the MRDTF. Conflicts regarding a split of equipment will require a sale of the equipment with the offering being made to the member agencies only. The proceeds of any sale will be divided equally between the remaining agencies. Once an agency receives a piece of equipment, it shall be the responsibility of said agency to maintain the equipment. In the event said equipment becomes lost and/or stolen or damaged, it shall be the agency's responsibility to replace said equipment. 19. Each officer assigned to the MRDTF will carry only those firearms, while on official duty, that are approved by their respective agencies. Further, the officer shall be qualified with those firearms. 20. Participating agencies agree to supply canine and/or tactical team assistance for drug operations within the MRDTF jurisdiction at no additional cost. Canine and tactical teams shall be requested from the nearest team's geographical location. Such requests will be at the direction and approval of the Task Force Commander. 21. Sub-Recipient Agency Responsibilities: Gallatin County will act as the lead agency for the MRDTF and is responsible for reporting and financial transactions with the granting agency, the Montana Board of Crime Control (MBCC). As Gallatin County will be receiving and distributing money on behalf of the MRDTF, Gallatin County is considered to be a pass-through entity and all other agencies participating in the MRDTF are considered sub-recipients. As such, Gallatin County is required to inform you of the following: The funding you will be receiving under the terms of this MOU is federal assistance originating from the United States Department of Justice, (CFDA #16.738), passed through the State of Montana Board of Crime Control, and then through Gallatin County. It is understood that any agencies receiving monies from this grant will be monitored by Gallatin County. By accepting any funding pursuant to this agreement, all remaining parties agree that they are considered sub-recipients of federal funding and are 64 11 therefore required to satisfy all of the legal and contractual requirements of the United States Department of Justice and the Montana Board of Crime Control including the conditions set forth in: The annual award documents from Gallatin County The Montana Board of Crime Control Special Conditions The Montana Board of Crime Control Subgrant Guideline Information 22. This agreement is in effect from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024. Revised: 12/22/93, 01/05/94, 01/11/96, 01/14/97, 01/09/98, 12/09/99, 12/21/00, 12/05/01, 12/03/02, 01/05/04, 05/06/05, 01/26/06, 05/09/08, 01/28/09, 02/20/09, 05/24/11, 4/11/13, 3/10/14, 3/10/15, 2/8/17, 1/16/19, 1/13/21, 1/18/23 65 13 SIGNATURE PAGE CITY OF BOZEMAN _________________________________________________________________ City Manager Date _________________________________________________________________ Chief of Police Date 66 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:John Van Delinder, Streets Superintendent Nicholas Ross, Director of Transportation and Engineering SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Construction Agreement with Western Systems to Install a Transportation Management Center, Communication Network, and Signal Switches at the City Shops MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to sign a Construction Agreement with Western Systems to install a Transportation Management Center, Communication Network and Signal Switches at the City Shops. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for existing and new infrastructure. BACKGROUND:The City of Bozeman Sign and Signal Division has the need to construct a city- wide Traffic Management Center communications system to enable the City to monitor, collect data and adjust in real time from and to City signalized intersections. The Traffic Management Center (TMC) must also allow us to work with the Montana Department of Transportation’s signals in Bozeman to monitor traffic data and corridor flow. In the future the TMC must allow traffic signal communication, agency coordination and effective future intersection decisions. The TMC must allow the city to remotely monitor signalized intersections during peak times, special events and traffic affected by weather events. To implement the above, Western Systems will furnish and install 22 Ethernet Switches in City maintained traffic signals and establish a communications system network for the City signals and the TMC at the Shops Complex at 814 N. Bozeman. All the work will be done with City of Bozeman personnel on site to fully understand the function of the system. All the above is hereby referred to as (the “Construction Project”) and Contractor’s duties are set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A whereby the unit price for each item includes both labor and materials. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:Cost of this project is $168,181.15 to be funded from the Street Department 67 Capital Improvement Plan in FY23 for STR124. Attachments: Western Systems Traffic Management Center Contract rev.1 Exhibit A Notice of Award Report compiled on: February 16, 2023 68 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 1 of 18 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT This Construction Agreement is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 202__ (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and, Western Systems, 1122 Industry Street, Bldg. B, Everett, WA 98203, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” The City and Contractor may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the covenants, agreements, representations, and warranties contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Work to be Performed: a. A description of the work to be performed is to construct a city wide Traffic Management Center communications system to enable the City to monitor, collect data and make adjustments in real time from and to City signalized intersections. The Traffic Management Center (TMC) must also allow us to work with the Montana Department of Transportation’s signals in Bozeman to monitor traffic data and corridor flow. In the future the TMC must allow traffic signal communication, agency coordination and effective future intersection decisions. The TMC must allow the city to remotely monitor signalized intersections during peak times, special events and traffic affected by weather events. To implement the above, Western Systems will furnish and install 22 Ethernet Switches in City maintained traffic signals, and establish a communications system network for the City signals and the TMC at the Shops Complex at 814 N. Bozeman. All of the work will be done with City of Bozeman personnel on site so as to fully understand the function of the system. All of the above is hereby referred to as (the “Construction Project”) and Contractor’s duties are set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A whereby the unit price for each item includes both labor and materials. Exhibit A is by this reference made a part hereof. b. Prior to the commencement of any work on the Construction Project, Contractor’s representatives and City’s representatives shall hold a meeting to establish a working understanding among the parties as to the scope of the Construction Project and duties of the Contractor. At this meeting, Contractor and City shall resolve any outstanding issues related to the plans, designs, drawings, and specifications. If the parties are unable to resolve these issues and the City fails, refuses, or is unable to approve the same, no work shall commence on the Construction Project until such issues are resolved and the City approves the related plans, designs, drawings, and specifications. 69 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 2 of 18 c. Except as provided elsewhere in this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish all the labor, materials, equipment, tools, and services necessary to perform and complete the Construction Project. d. During work on the Construction Project, and as part of the final completion of the Construction Project, Contractor shall clean up the Project site, including the removal and satisfactory disposal of all waste, garbage, excess materials, and equipment, and the performance of any other work necessary to restore the site to at least as good order and condition as at the commencement of the Construction Project. 2. City-Supplied Materials: The City may supply materials from time to time in furtherance of the Construction Project. Such materials will be noted as an addendum to this Agreement. 3. Time of Performance: Contractor shall begin the Construction Project after receiving a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete the Construction Project no later than 3/31/2023. Time is of the essence of completion of all work and each phase of the Construction Project. 4. Liquidated Damages: If the Construction Project is not completed within the time provided by this Agreement, the City may deduct for each day the Construction Project remains uncompleted the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) from the compensation hereinafter specified and retain that sum as payment for liquidated damages sustained by reason of the Contractor’s failure to complete the Construction Project on time. 5. Compensation: a. City shall pay to Contractor, and Contractor shall accept as full payment for the performance of this Agreement and the Construction Project, the amount of one hundred sixty eight thousand, one hundred eighty one and 15/100 Dollars ($168,181.15). b. If work not included within the original Construction Documents is requested by City, such additional work and the related compensation shall be agreed to in writing by both parties prior to commencement of the additional work (“Change Order”). c. City shall retain five percent (5%) of the total amount of compensation to be paid to the Contractor to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the timely completion of the Construction Project and any and all “punch list” items (“Retainage Amount”). The Retainage Amount shall be paid to Contractor thirty (30) days after the City’s final acceptance of the portion of work for which a separate price is stated in the specifications for the Construction Project. e. Upon acceptance of final payment and for other good and valuable consideration, Contractor shall and hereby does release and forever discharge City, its 70 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 3 of 18 officers, agents, and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, obligations, and liabilities of every kind and character whatsoever, in law and in equity, whether now known or in the future discovered, arising from or related to this Agreement or the Construction Project that Contractor may have or assert against City, its officers, agents, and employees. 6. Inspection and Testing: a. City has the right to inspect and test any and all work performed by Contractor on the Construction Project. Contractor shall allow City and its agents access to the Construction Project at all times and shall provide every reasonable facility for the purpose of such inspection and testing, including temporarily discontinuing portions of the work or uncovering or taking down portions of the finished work. Any inspection and testing performed by the City and its agents is for the sole benefit of the City and shall not relieve the Contractor of its duty, responsibility, and obligation to ensure that the work strictly complies with the Agreement terms and conditions and all applicable laws and building and safety codes. City’s inspection and testing shall not be deemed or considered acceptance by the City of any portion of the Construction Project. City’s inspection and testing shall not serve to nullify, amend, or waive any warranties provided by the Contractor under this Agreement. b. Contractor shall, without charge, replace any material or correct any work found by the City or its agents to be defective or otherwise not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event Contractor fails to replace or correct any defective work or materials after reasonable written notice by the City to do so, the City may take such corrective action, either with its own materials and employees or by retaining any third party to do so, and deduct the cost and expense of such corrective action from the Contractor’s compensation. 7. Partial Utilization of Construction Project: City shall have the right to use or occupy any portion of the Construction Project that City and Contractor mutually agree is substantially completed and constitutes a separately functioning and usable part of the Construction Project for its intended purpose without significant interference with Contractor’s performance of the remaining portions of the Construction Project. In the event City takes possession of any portion of the Construction Project, such possession shall not be deemed an acceptance of the Construction Project, in whole or in part. City’s use of any portion of the Construction Project shall not be grounds for extensions of any construction deadlines or a change in the Contractor’s compensation. Contractor’s warranties shall run from the completion of the total Construction Project and not from the date the City may take possession of selected portions of the Construction Project. 8. Related Work at the Site: Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent or preclude City, through its own employees or by contract with any third party, from performing other work related to the Construction Project at the construction site; provided such related work is not otherwise addressed in this Agreement and provided such related work does not otherwise interfere 71 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 4 of 18 with Contractor’s performance of this Agreement or the completion of the Construction Project. Contractor shall afford any City employee, agent or representative, or any third party under contract with the City to perform the related work, proper and safe access to the construction site, a reasonable opportunity for the introduction and storage of materials and equipment, the opportunity to perform the related work, and shall properly coordinate the Contractor’s work on the Construction Project with the related work. 9. Contractor’s Warranties: Contractor represents and warrants as follows: a. Unless otherwise specified by the terms of this Agreement, all materials and equipment used by Contractor on the Construction Project shall be new and where not otherwise specified, of the most suitable grade for their intended uses. b. All workmanship and materials shall be of a kind and nature acceptable to the City. c. All equipment, materials, and labor provided to, on, or for the Construction Project must be free of defects and nonconformities in design, materials, and workmanship for a minimum period beginning with the commencement of the work on the Construction Project and ending one (1) year from the final completion and acceptance by the City of the Construction Project, regardless of whether such equipment, materials, or labor were supplied directly by Contractor or indirectly by Contractor’s subcontractors or suppliers. Other express warranties on materials that provide for a warranty period longer than one year apply for the period of that express warranty and are not reduced by this provision. Upon receipt of City’s written notice of a defective or nonconforming condition during the warranty period, Contractor shall take all actions, including redesign and replacement, to correct the defective or nonconforming condition within a time frame acceptable to the City and at no additional cost to the City. Contractor shall also, at its sole cost, perform any tests required by City to verify that such defective or nonconforming condition has been corrected. Contractor warrants the corrective action taken against defective and nonconforming conditions for a period of an additional one (1) year from the date of City’s acceptance of the corrective action. d. Contractor and its sureties are liable for the satisfaction and full performance of all warranties. e. Contractor shall give its personal attention to the faithful prosecution of the completion of the Construction Project and Contractor, or its duly authorized representative assigned to serve as the Construction Project Manager, shall be personally present at the site of the Construction Project during working hours for the term of this Agreement until the completion of the Construction Project. f. Contractor shall have a complete, accurate, and up-to-date set of construction plans, drawings, and specifications on site at all times. 72 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 5 of 18 g. Contractor has examined all available records and made field examinations of the site of the Construction Project. Contractor has knowledge of the field conditions to be encountered during the Construction Project. Contractor has knowledge of the types and character of equipment necessary for the work, the types of materials needed and the sources of such materials, and the condition of the local labor market. h. Contractor is responsible for the safety of the work and shall maintain all lights, guards, signs, temporary passages, or other protections necessary for that purpose at all times. i. All work must be performed at Contractor’s risk, and Contractor shall promptly repair or replace all damage and loss at its sole cost and expense regardless of the reason or cause of the damage or loss; provided, however, should the damage or loss be caused by an intentional or negligent act of the City, the risk of such loss shall be placed on the City. j. Contractor is responsible for any loss or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in the completion of performance of the Construction Project. k. Contractor’s performance must be without damage or disruption to any other work or property of the City or of others and without interference with the operation of existing machinery or equipment. l. Title to all work, materials, and equipment covered by any payment of Contractor’s compensation by City, whether directly incorporated into the Construction Project or not, passes to City at the time of payment, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 10. Delays and Extensions of Time: If Contractor’s performance of this Agreement is prevented or delayed by any unforeseen cause beyond the control of the Contractor, including acts or omissions of the City, Contractor shall, within ten (10) days of the commencement of any such delay, give the City written notice thereof. Further, Contractor shall, within ten (10) days of the termination of such delay, give the City written notice of the total actual duration of the delay. If the City is provided with these required notices and if the City determines that the cause of the delay was not foreseeable, was beyond the control of the Contractor, and was not a result of the fault or negligence of the Contractor, then the City will determine the total duration of the delay and extend the time for performance of the Agreement accordingly. Unless the delay is caused by the intentional interference of the City with the Contractor’s performance, Contractor shall make no claim for damages or any other claim other than for an extension of time as herein provided by reason of any delays. 11. Suspension: a. The City may, by written notice to the Contractor and at its convenience for any reason, suspend the performance of all or any portion of the work to be performed on 73 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 6 of 18 the Construction Project (“Notice of Suspension”). The Notice of Suspension shall set forth the time of suspension, if then known to the City. During the period of suspension, Contractor shall use its best efforts to minimize costs associated with the suspension. b. Upon Contractor’s receipt of any Notice of Suspension, unless the notice requires otherwise, Contractor shall: (1) immediately discontinue work on the date and to the extent specified in the Notice of Suspension; (2) place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services, or equipment; (3) promptly make every reasonable effort to obtain suspension upon terms satisfactory to City of all orders, subcontracts, and rental agreements to the extent that they relate to the performance of the work suspended; and (4) continue to protect and maintain the Project, including those portions on which work has been suspended. c. As compensation for the suspended work, Contractor will be reimbursed for the following costs, reasonably incurred, without duplication of any item, and to the extent that such costs directly resulted from the suspension: (1) a standby charge paid during the period of suspension which will be sufficient to compensate Contractor for keeping, to the extent required in the Notice of Suspension, Contractor’s organization and equipment committed to the Project in standby status; (2) all reasonably incurred costs for the demobilization of Contractor’s and subcontractor’s crews and equipment; (3) an equitable amount to reimburse Contractor for the cost to protect and maintain the Project during the period of suspension; and (4) an equitable adjustment in the cost of performing the remaining portion of the work post-suspension if, as a direct result of the suspension, the cost to Contractor of subsequently performing the remaining work on the Construction Project has increased or decreased. d. Upon receipt of written notice by the City to resume the suspended work (“Notice to Resume Work”), Contractor shall immediately resume performance of the suspended work as to the extent required in the Notice to Resume Work. Any claim by Contractor for time or compensation described in Section 11(c) shall be made within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the Notice to Resume Work and Contractor shall submit a revised Construction Schedule for the City’s review and approval. Contractor’s failure to timely make such a claim shall result in a waiver of the claim. e. No compensation described in Section 11(c) shall be paid and no extension of time to complete the Construction Project shall be granted if the suspension results from Contractor’s non-compliance with or breach of the terms or requirements of this Agreement. 12. Termination for Contractor’s Fault: a. If Contractor refuses or fails to timely do the work, or any part thereof, or fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, or otherwise breaches any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City may, by written notice, terminate this Agreement and the Contractor’s right to proceed with all or any part of the Construction 74 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 7 of 18 Project (“Termination Notice Due to Contractor’s Fault”). The City may then take over the Construction Project and complete it, either with its own resources or by re-letting the contract to any other third party, and may immediately take possession of and use such materials, appliances, tools, and equipment as may be on the site and which may be necessary for the completion of the Construction Project. b. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 12, Contractor shall be entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered. In the case of a lump sum or unit price contract, Contractor shall not be entitled to any further payment until the Construction Project has been completed. Upon completion of the Construction Project, if the unpaid balance of the Contractor’s compensation exceeds the cost to the City of completing the work, including all costs paid to any subcontractors or third parties retained by the City to complete the Construction Project and all administrative costs resulting from the termination (“City’s Cost for Completion”), such excess shall be paid to the Contractor. If the City’s Cost for Completion exceeds the unpaid balance of the Contractor’s compensation, then Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for and shall pay the difference, plus interest at the rate applicable to court judgments, to the City. c. Any termination provided for by this Section 12 shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled under the law or at equity. d. In the event of termination under this Section 12, Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 13. Termination for City’s Convenience: a. Should conditions arise which, in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, make it advisable to the City to cease work on the Construction Project, the City may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Contractor (“Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience”). The termination shall be effective in the manner specified in the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience and shall be without prejudice to any claims that the City may otherwise have against Contractor. b. Upon receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, unless otherwise directed in the Notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease work on the Construction Project, discontinue placing orders for materials, supplies, and equipment for the Construction Project, and make every reasonable effort to cancel all existing orders or contracts upon terms satisfactory to the City. Contractor shall do only such work as may be necessary to preserve, protect, and maintain work already completed, in progress, or in transit to the construction site. c. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 13, Contractor is entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered and materials 75 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 8 of 18 actually purchased or which Contractor has made obligations to purchase on or before the receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, and reasonably incurred costs for demobilization of Contractor’s and any subcontractor’s crews. It is agreed that any materials that City is obligated to purchase from Contractor will remain the City’s sole property. d. The compensation described in Section 13(c) is the sole compensation due to Contractor for its performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 14. Limitation on Contractor’s Damages; Time for Asserting Claim: a. In the event of a claim for damages by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor’s damages shall be limited to contract damages and Contractor hereby expressly waives any right to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature or kind. b. In the event Contractor wants to assert a claim for damages of any kind or nature, Contractor shall provide City with written notice of its claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding and giving rise to the claim, and the total amount of damages sought by the claim, within ten (10) days of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the claim. In the event Contractor fails to provide such notice, Contractor shall waive all rights to assert such claim. 15. Representatives and Notices: a. City’s Representative: The City’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Nicholas Ross, Director of Transportation and Engineering or such other individual as City shall designate in writing. Whenever approval or authorization from or communication or submission to City is required by this Agreement, such communication or submission shall be directed to the City’s Representative and approvals or authorizations shall be issued only by such Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when City’s Representative is not available, Contractor may direct its communication or submission to other designated City personnel or agents and may receive approvals or authorization from such persons. b. Contractor’s Representative: The Contractor’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Jesse Lassandro, Project Manager or such other individual as Contractor shall designate in writing. Whenever direction to or communication with Contractor is required by this Agreement, such direction or communication shall be directed to Contractor’s Representative; provided, however, that 76 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 9 of 18 in exigent circumstances when Contractor’s Representative is not available, City may direct its direction or communication to other designated Contractor personnel or agents. c. Notices: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided to the Representatives named in this Section. Notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered by courier to Party’s address shown above during normal business hours of the recipient; or when sent, if sent by email or fax (with a successful transmission report) to the email address or fax number provided by the Party’s Representative; or on the fifth business day following mailing, if mailed by ordinary mail to the address shown above, postage prepaid. 16. Locating Underground Facilities: Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining and determining the location of any underground facilities, including but not limited to, the location of any pipelines or utility supply, delivery, or service lines in accordance with the provisions of §69-4-501, et seq., Montana Code Annotated (MCA). Contractor shall make every effort to avoid damage to underground facilities and shall be solely responsible for any damage that may occur. If City personnel assume responsibility for locating any underground facilities, this fact shall be noted in writing prior to commencement of such location work. 17. Permits: Contractor shall provide all notices, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, including a City of Bozeman business license, and inspections from applicable governmental authorities, pay all fees and charges in connection therewith, and perform all surveys and locations necessary for the timely completion of the Construction Project. 18. Ownership of Documents; Indemnification: All plans, designs, drawings, specifications, documents, sample results and data, in whatever medium or format, originated or prepared by or for Contractor in contemplation of, or in the course of, or as a result of this Agreement or work on the Construction Project, shall be promptly furnished to the City (“City Documents and Information”). All City Documents and Information shall be the exclusive property of the City and shall be deemed to be works-for-hire. Contractor hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in and to the City Documents and Information, including but not limited to, all copyright and patent rights in and to the City Documents and Information. Neither party grants to the other any express or implied licenses under any patents, copyrights, trademarks, or other intellectual property rights, except to the extent necessary to complete its obligations to the other under this Agreement. 77 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 10 of 18 19. Laws and Regulations: Contractor shall comply fully with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and municipal ordinances including, but not limited to, all workers’ compensation laws, all environmental laws including, but not limited to, the generation and disposal of hazardous waste, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), the safety rules, codes, and provisions of the Montana Safety Act in Title 50, Chapter 71, MCA, all applicable City, County, and State building and electrical codes, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all non-discrimination, affirmative action, and utilization of minority and small business statutes and regulations. 20. Nondiscrimination and Equal Pay: The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 21. Intoxicants; DOT Drug and Alcohol Regulations: Contractor shall not permit or suffer the introduction or use of any intoxicants, including alcohol or illegal drugs, upon the site of the Construction Project. Contractor acknowledges it is aware of and shall comply with its responsibilities and obligations under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations governing anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention plans and related testing. City shall have the right to request proof of such compliance and Contractor shall be obligated to furnish such proof. The Contractor shall be responsible for instructing and training the Contractor's employees and agents in proper and specified work methods and procedures. The Contractor shall provide continuous inspection and supervision of the work performed. The Contractor is responsible for instructing its employees and agents in safe work practices. 78 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 11 of 18 22. Labor Relations: a. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement and throughout the course of Contractor’s performance of the Construction Project, any labor problems or disputes of any type arise or materialize which in turn cause any work on the Construction Project to cease for any period of time, Contractor specifically agrees to take immediate steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take to resume work on the Construction Project shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. Contractor shall provide immediate relief to the City so as to permit the work on the Construction Project to resume and be completed within the time frames set forth in the Construction Schedule at no additional cost to City. b. The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this Agreement and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies handbook and may not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. c. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 39, Chapter 71, Montana Code Annotated (MCA), and the Occupational Disease Act of Montana, Title 39, Chapter 71, MCA. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all members and employees of Contractor’s business, except for those members who are exempted by law. d. Contractor shall furnish the City with copies showing one of the following: (1) a binder for workers’ compensation coverage by an insurer licensed and authorized to provide workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Montana; or (2) proof of exemption from workers’ compensation granted by law for independent contractors. e. Contractor shall post a legible statement of all wages and fringe benefits to be paid to the Contractor’s employees and the frequency of such payments (i.e., hourly wage employees shall be paid weekly). Such posting shall be made in a prominent and accessible location at the Contractor’s normal place of business and shall be made no later than the first day of services provided under this Agreement. Such posting shall be removed only upon expiration or termination of this Agreement. f. In performing the services under this Agreement, Contractor shall give preference to the employment of bona fide residents of Montana, as required by §18-2-403, MCA, as such term is defined by §18-2-401(1), MCA. When making assignments of work, Contractor shall use workers both skilled in their trade and specialized in their field of work for all work to which they are assigned. 79 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 12 of 18 g. Pursuant to §§18-2-403 and 18-2-422, MCA, Contractor shall pay wages, fringe benefits, and expenses, including travel allowances as set forth in the current Montana Prevailing Wage Rate for Construction Services in effect and applicable to Gallatin County, Montana, which schedule is incorporated herein. Contractor shall pay all hourly wage employees on a weekly basis. Violation of the requirements set forth in the above State of Montana schedule of prevailing wage rates may subject the Contractor to the penalties set forth in §18-2-407, MCA. Contractor shall maintain payroll records during the term of this Agreement and for a period of three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. h. The Contractor shall ensure that any person, firm or entity performing any portion of the services under this Agreement for which the contractor, subcontractor or employer is responsible, is paid the applicable standard prevailing rate of wages. i. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement, any labor problems or disputes of any type arise or materialize which in turn cause any services to cease for any period of time, Contractor specifically agrees to take immediate steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. Contractor shall provide immediate relief to the City so as to permit the services to continue at no additional cost to City. j. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and liabilities arising out of, resulting from, or occurring in connection with any labor problems or disputes or any delays or stoppages of work associated with such problems or disputes and for any claims regarding underpaid prevailing wages. 23. Subcontractors: a. Contractor may employ subcontractors for any work on the Construction Project. Contractor shall provide City with a list of all subcontractors employed. b. Contractor remains fully responsible for the acts and omissions of any subcontractor, just as Contractor is for its own acts and omissions, and Contractor shall remain fully responsible and liable for the timely completion of the Construction Project. c. Contractor is solely liable for any and all payments to subcontractors. Contractor shall hold all payments received from the City in trust for the benefit of subcontractors, and all such payments shall be used to satisfy obligations of the Construction Project before being used for any other purpose. Contractor shall make any payments due to any subcontractor within seven (7) days of Contractor’s receipt of payment, including a proportional part of the retainage Contractor has received from the City. In the event of a dispute regarding any subcontractor’s invoice, Contractor shall 80 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 13 of 18 promptly pay the undisputed amount to the subcontractor and notify the subcontractor in writing of the amount in dispute and the reasons for the dispute. Any withholding of payment must comply with the requirements of §28-2-2103, MCA. In the event Contractor is unwilling or unable to make timely and proper payment to any subcontractor, City may elect to withhold any payment otherwise due to Contractor and upon seven (7) days’ written notice to Contractor, may pay subcontractor by direct or joint payment. 24. Indebtedness and Liens: Before City may make any final payment to Contractor, Contractor shall furnish City with satisfactory proof that there are no outstanding debts or liens in connection with the Construction Project. If the Contractor allows any indebtedness to accrue to subcontractors or others during the progress of the work, and fails to pay or discharge the same within five (5) days after demand, then City may either withhold any money due to Contractor until such indebtedness is paid or apply the same towards the discharge of the indebtedness. If any lien or claim is filed or made by any subcontractor, material supplier, or any other person, the Contractor shall immediately notify the City and shall cause the same to be discharged of record within thirty (30) days after its filing. 25. Hazard Communication: Contractor shall comply with all hazard communication requirements dictated by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Department of Agriculture, OSHA, Hazard Communications Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200, and applicable City ordinances. Contractor shall supply a chemical list, the associated material safety data sheets (MSDS), and other pertinent health exposure data for chemicals that the Contractor’s, subcontractor’s or the City’s employees may be exposed to while working on City property during the course of the Construction Project. One copy of this documentation must be delivered to City to the attention of the City’s Representative. This documentation must be delivered before work involving these chemicals may commence. 26. Accounts and Records: During the term of this Agreement and for two (2) years following the City’s final acceptance of the Construction Project, Contractor shall maintain accounts and records related to the Construction Project. Upon reasonable notice, City shall have the right to inspect all such accounts and records, including but not limited to, Contractor’s records, books, correspondence, instructions, drawings, specifications, field and site notes, receipts, invoices, bills, contracts, or other documents relating to the Construction Project. 27. Indemnification; Insurance; Bonds: a. Contractor agrees to release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and officers (collectively referred to for purposes of this Section as the City) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, fees and costs (including attorney’s fees and the costs and fees of and expert witness and consultants), losses, expenses, liabilities (including liability where activity is inherently or intrinsically dangerous) or damages of whatever kind or nature connected therewith and without limit and without regard to the cause or causes thereof or the negligence of any party or parties that may be asserted against, recovered from or suffered by the City occasioned by, growing or arising out of or resulting from or in any way related to: (i) the 81 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 14 of 18 negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of the Contractor; or (ii) any negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of any of the Contractor’s agents. b. Such obligations shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist. The indemnification obligations of this Section must not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any common-law or statutory rights of the indemnitee(s) which would otherwise exist as to such indemnitee(s). c. Contractor’s indemnity under this Section shall be without regard to and without any right to contribution from any insurance maintained by City. d. Should the City be required to bring an action against the Contractor to assert its right to defense or indemnification under this Agreement or under the Contractor’s applicable insurance policies required below the City shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in asserting its right to indemnification or defense but only if a court of competent jurisdiction determines the Contractor was obligated to defend the claim(s) or was obligated to indemnify the City for a claim(s) or any portion(s) thereof. e. In the event of an action filed against the City resulting from the City’s performance under this Agreement, the City may elect to represent itself and incur all costs and expenses of suit. f. Contractor also waives any and all claims and recourse against the City, including the right of contribution for loss or damage to person or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to the performance of this Agreement except “responsibility for [City’s] own fraud, for willful injury to the person or property of another, or for violation of law, whether willful or negligent” as per 28-2-702, MCA. g. These obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement and the services performed hereunder. h. In addition to and independent from the above, Contractor shall at Contractor’s expense secure insurance coverage through an insurance company or companies duly licensed and authorized to conduct insurance business in Montana which insures the liabilities and obligations specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance coverage shall not contain any exclusion for liabilities specifically assumed by the Contractor in subsection (a) of this Section. The insurance shall cover and apply to all claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses that may be asserted or claimed against, recovered from, or suffered by the City without limit and without regard to the cause therefore and which is acceptable to the City. Contractor shall furnish to the City an accompanying certificate of insurance and accompanying endorsements in amounts not less than as shown below: 82 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 15 of 18 • Workers’ Compensation – not less than statutory limits; • Employers’ Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; • Commercial General Liability - $2,000,000 per occurrence; $4,000,000 annual aggregate; • Products and Completed Operations – $1,000,000; • Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 property damage/bodily injury; $2,000,000 annual aggregate (all owned, hired, non-owned vehicles); • Builder’s Risk/Property Insurance at least as broad as that provided by the ISO special causes of loss form (CP10 30) naming at a minimum the City in an amount equal to greater of Contractor’s compensation or full replacement value of the work (covering at a minimum all work, buildings, materials and equipment, whether on site or in transit, loss due to fire, lightening, theft, vandalism, malicious mischief, earthquake, collapse, debris removal, demolition occasioned by enforcement of laws, water damage, flood if site within a flood plain, repair or replacement costs, testing and start-up costs) on an all risk coverage basis. This insurance must include waivers of subrogation between the City and Contractor to the extent that damage to the Construction Project or City Hall is covered by other insurance; • Owner’s and Contractor’s Protective Liability: one policy designating the City (including its agents, representatives, employees, and officers) as the insured and another independent policy designated the City’s Representative (including its consultants, consultants, agents and employees) as the insured on the declarations with both policies covering: (i) operations performed by the Contractor under this Agreement for the City; and (ii) the City’s and City’s Representatives acts or omissions, including negligent acts, in connection with its general supervision of the work of the Contractor’s and its subcontractors - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 aggregate; • Contractual Liability Insurance (covering the Contractor’s indemnity obligations described in this Agreement) - $1,000,000 per occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate The amounts of insurance provided shall be exclusive of defense costs. The City of Bozeman shall be endorsed as an additional or named insured on a primary non-contributory basis on both the Commercial General and Automobile Liability policies. The insurance and required endorsements must be in a form suitable to City and shall include no less than a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Contractor shall notify City within two (2) business days of Contractor’s receipt of notice that any required insurance coverage will be terminated or Contractor’s decision to terminate any required insurance coverage for any reason. The City must approve all insurance coverage and endorsements prior to the Contractor commencing work. i. Pursuant to the City’s authority provided for in 18-2-201(4), the Contractor shall not be required to provide bonds as required by 18-2-201(1) under this Agreement. 83 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 16 of 18 28. Taxes: Contractor is obligated to pay all taxes of any kind or nature and make all appropriate employee withholdings. Contractor understands that all contractors or subcontractors working on a publicly funded project are required to pay or have withheld from earnings a license fee of one percent (1%) of the gross contract price if the gross contract price is Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) or more. This license fee is paid to the Montana Department of Revenue. 29. Dispute Resolution: a. Any claim, controversy, or dispute between the parties, their agents, employees, or representatives shall be resolved first by negotiation between senior-level personnel from each party duly authorized to execute settlement agreements. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the parties may invite an independent, disinterested mediator to assist in the negotiated settlement discussions. b. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the dispute was first raised, then such dispute shall be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in compliance with the Applicable Law provisions of this Agreement. 30. Survival: Contractor’s indemnification and warranty obligations shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for the maximum period allowed under applicable law. 31. Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not be construed as a part of the Agreement or as a limitation on the scope of the particular paragraphs to which they refer. 32. Waiver: A waiver by City of any default or breach by Contractor of any covenants, terms, or conditions of this Agreement does not limit City’s right to enforce such covenants, terms, or conditions or to pursue City’s rights in the event of any subsequent default or breach. 33. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In the event it becomes necessary for either Party to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party or the Party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including the City Attorney’s Office staff. 34. Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the balance thereof shall continue in effect. 35. Applicable Law: The parties agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. 84 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 17 of 18 36. Binding Effect: This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. 37. Amendments: This Agreement may not be modified, amended, or changed in any respect except by a written document signed by all parties. 38. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties, does not constitute a third-party beneficiary agreement, and may not be relied upon or enforced by a third party. 38. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together constitute one instrument. 39. Assignment: Contractor may not assign this Agreement in whole or in part without the prior written consent of the City. No assignment will relieve Contractor of its responsibility for the performance of the Agreement and the completion of the Construction Project. Contractor may not assign to any third party other than Contractor’s subcontractors on the Construction Project, the right to receive monies due from City without the prior written consent of City. 40. Authority: Each party represents that it has full power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and the person signing this Agreement on behalf of each party has been properly authorized and empowered to sign this Agreement. 41. Independent Contractor: The parties agree and acknowledge that in the performance of this Agreement and the completion of the Construction Project, Contractor shall render services as an independent contractor and not as the agent, representative, subcontractor, or employee of the City. The parties further agree that all individuals and companies retained by Contractor at all times will be considered the agents, employees, or independent contractors of Contractor and at no time will they be the employees, agents, or representatives of the City. 42. Integration: This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement of the parties. Covenants or representations not contained therein or made a part thereof by reference, are not binding upon the parties. There are no understandings between the parties other than as set forth in this Agreement. All communications, either verbal or written, made prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby abrogated and withdrawn unless specifically made a part of this Agreement by reference. 43. Consent to Electronic Signatures: The Parties have consented to execute this Agreement electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** 85 Construction Agreement for a City Wide Communications System and Transportation Management Center at the City Shops FY2022-2023 Page 18 of 18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Contractor and City have caused this Agreement to be executed, effective on the date written above, and intend to be legally bound thereby. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA CONTRACTOR By: _______________________________ By: Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Print Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _______________________________ Greg Sullivan, City Attorney 86 87 88 89 EJCDC C-510 Notice of Award Prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee and endorsed by the Construction Specifications Institute. Page 1 of 2 Notice of Award Date: _______________ Project: Install a Transportation Management Center, Communication Network and Signal Switches at the City Shops Owner: City of Bozeman Owner's Contract No.: Contract: The City of Bozeman Sign and Signal Division has the need to construct a city-wide Traffic Management Center communications system to enable the City to monitor, collect data and adjust in real time from and to City signalized intersections. The Traffic Management Center (TMC) must also allow us to work with the Montana Department of Transportation’s signals in Bozeman to monitor traffic data and corridor flow. In the future the TMC must allow traffic signal communication, agency coordination and effective future intersection decisions. The TMC must allow the city to remotely monitor signalized intersections during peak times, special events and traffic affected by weather events. To implement the above, Western Systems will furnish and install 22 Ethernet Switches in City maintained traffic signals and establish a communications system network for the City signals and the TMC at the Shops Complex at 814 N. Bozeman. All the work will be done with City of Bozeman personnel on site to fully understand the function of the system. All the above is hereby referred to as (the “Construction Project”) and Contractor’s duties are set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A whereby the unit price for each item includes both labor and materials. Engineer's Project No.: Q-09102 Bidder: Western Systems Bidder's Address: 1122 Industry Street, Bldg. B, Everett WA 98203 You are notified that your Bid dated July 7, 2022 for the above Contract has been considered. You are the Successful Bidder and are awarded a Contract for Base Bid. The Contract Price of your Contract is one hundred sixty eight thousand, one hundred eighty one and 15/100 Dollars ($168,181.15). Four (4) copies of the proposed Contract Documents (except Drawings) accompany this Notice of Award. You must comply with the following conditions precedent within [15] days of the date you receive this Notice of Award. 1. Deliver to the Owner Four (4) fully executed counterparts of the Contract Documents. 2. Deliver with the executed Contract Documents the Contract security [Bonds] as specified in the Instructions to Bidders (Article 20), General Conditions (Paragraph 5.01), and Supplementary Conditions (Paragraph SC-5.01). 3. Other conditions precedent: Deliver with the executed Contract Documents the required insurance certificates. Failure to comply with these conditions within the time specified will entitle Owner to consider you in default, annul this Notice of Award, and declare your Bid security forfeited. 90 EJCDC C-510 Notice of Award Prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee and endorsed by the Construction Specifications Institute. Page 2 of 2 Within ten days after you comply with the above conditions, Owner will return to you one fully executed counterpart of the Contract Documents. City of Bozeman Owner By: Authorized Signature Title Copy to Engineer 91 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:John Van Delinder, Streets Superintendent Nicholas Ross, Director of Transportation and Engineering SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Lease-Purchase Agreement with Lease Servicing Center, Inc dba NCL Government Capital for a 2022 Elgin Broom Bear Sweeper MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to sign a Lease-Purchase Agreement with Lease Servicing Center, Inc dba NCL Government Capital for a 2022 Elgin Broom Bear Sweeper. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for existing and new infrastructure. BACKGROUND:The Approved FY23 Street Maintenance Capital Improvement Program (CIP) STR34 and the FY23 approved budget lists $100,000 for sweeper leases. This expenditure is listed in the CIP plan through FY27, which will be last lease payment for this sweeper. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:This item is in the FY23 Street Maintenance CIP and approved FY23 budget. Attachments: Lease Agreement and Exhibits Report compiled on: February 7, 2023 92 City of Bozeman 121 N Rouse Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Enclosed you will find finance documentation for your recent equipment purchase. Please review, sign, and date all the enclosed documents. Be sure to completely list your insurance information. Do not alter documents in any way. Please return the following items to my attention: Master Lease Purchase Agreement Exhibit A – Description of Equipment of Lease Agreement Exhibit B – Schedule of Payments Exhibit E – Lessee Resolution Exhibit F – Bank Qualified Certificate Exhibit G – Agreement to Provide Insurance Exhibit H – Lessee Certificate Notice of Assignment and Letter of Direction Internal Escrow Letter Lease Payment Instructions Exhibit C-1 – Payment Request and Partial Acceptance Certificate Exhibit C-2 – Final Acceptance 8038-G Copy of Tax Exempt Certificate (please provide if applicable) Include in the return documentation a check in the amount of $500.00 made payable to Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital. This is the one-time documentation & processing fee. Please call me at 320-763-7600 with any questions you may have and thank you for your business. We hope to continue to work with you for many years to come. Please let us know if we can be of any assistance in the future! Sincerely, Tim Goetsch Enclosures 93 1 MASTER LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT Lessee Lessor City of Bozeman Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital 121 N Rouse Ave 510 22nd Ave E., Ste 501 Bozeman, MT 59715 Alexandria, MN 56308 Dated as of February 3, 2023 This Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of the date listed above is between Lessor and Lessee listed directly above. Lessor desires from time to time to lease the Equipment described in Equipment Schedules (each a “Schedule”) to be attached hereto to Lessee and Lessee desires to lease such Equipment from Lessor subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, which are set forth below, and the applicable Schedule. I. Definitions: Section 1.01. Definitions. The following terms will have the meanings indicated below unless the context clearly requires otherwise: “Agreement’ means this Master Lease Purchase Agreement. “Budget Year” means the Lessee’s fiscal year. “Commencement Date” is the date when Lessee’s obligation to pay rent begins. “Equipment” means the items of Equipment listed on Exhibit “A” to each Schedule and all replacements, restorations, modifications and improvements. “Lease” means this Agreement and an individual Schedule hereto, which shall collectively constitute the terms and conditions applicable to the lease of the Equipment subject thereto. “Lessee” means the entity listed above as Lessee and which is leasing the Equipment from Lessor under the provisions of this Agreement and a Schedule. “Lessor” means the entity originally listed above as Lessor or any of its assignees. “Lease Term” means the Original Term and all Renewal Terms applicable to a Lease. “Original Term” means the period from the Commencement Date until the end of the Budget Year of Lessee. “Renewal Term” means the annual term which begins at the end of the Original Term and which is simultaneous with Lessee’s Budget Year. “Rental Payments” means the payments Lessee is required to make under this Agreement as set forth on Exhibit “B” to each Schedule made subject thereto. “Schedule” means a schedule substantially in the form attached hereto and all exhibits thereto pursuant to which Lessor and Lessee agree to the lease of the Equipment described therein and which together with the terms of the Agreement applicable thereto constitutes an individual Lease. “State” means the state in which Lessee is located. II. Lessee Warranties Section 2.01. With respect to each Lease, Lessee represents, warrants and covenants as follows for the benefit of Lessor or its assignees: (a) Lessee is the State or a political subdivision of the State within the meaning of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") or a constituted authority authorized to issue obligations on behalf of the State or political subdivision of the State within the meaning of the treasury regulations promulgated under the Code. (b) Lessee is authorized under the Constitution and laws of the State to enter into this Agreement and each Schedule, and has used such authority to properly execute and deliver this Agreement and each Schedule. Lessee has followed all proper procedures of its governing body in executing this Agreement and each Schedule. The Officer of Lessee executing this Agreement and each Schedule has the authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and such Schedule. This Agreement and each Schedule constitute a legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligation of the Lessee in accordance with their terms. (c) Lessee has complied with all statutory laws and regulations that may be applicable to the execution of this Agreement and each Schedule. (d) Lessee shall use the Equipment only for essential, traditional government purposes. (e) Should the Lessee cease to be an issuer of tax exempt obligations or if the obligation of Lessee created under any Lease ceases to be a tax exempt obligation for any reason, then Lessee shall be required to pay additional sums to the Lessor or its assignees so as to bring the after tax yield on any Lease to the same level as the Lessor or its assignees would attain if the transaction continued to be tax-exempt. (f) Lessee has never non-appropriated funds under an agreement similar to this Agreement. (g) Lessee will submit to the Secretary of the Treasury an information reporting statement as required by the Code with respect to each Lease. (h) Upon request by Lessor, Lessee will provide Lessor with current financial statements, reports, budgets or other relevant fiscal information. (i) Lessee shall retain the Equipment free of any hazardous substances as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et. seq. as amended and supplemented. (j) Lessee presently intends to continue each Lease for the Original Term and all Renewal Terms as set forth on Exhibit "B" to the Schedule relating thereto. The official of Lessee responsible for budget preparation will include in the budget request for each Budget Year the Rental Payments to become due in such Budget year, and will use all reasonable and lawful means available to secure the appropriation of money for such Budget Year sufficient to pay the Rental Payments coming due therein. Lessee reasonably believes that moneys can and will lawfully be appropriated and made available for this purpose. Section 2.02. Escrow Agreement. In the event both Lessor and Lessee mutually agree to utilize an escrow account, then immediately following the execution and delivery of any Schedule, Lessor and Lessee agree to execute and deliver and to cause an escrow agent to execute and deliver an escrow agreement. Such Lease shall take effect only upon execution and delivery of the escrow agreement by the parties thereto. Lessor shall deposit or cause to be deposited with the escrow agent for credit to an equipment acquisition fund the sum specified in such Schedule which shall be held, invested and disbursed in accordance with the escrow agreement. III. Acquisition of Equipment, Rental Payments and the Purchase Option Price Section 3.01. Acquisition: Lessee shall advise Lessor of its desire to lease Equipment and of the desired lease terms. Upon agreement by Lessor and Lessee as to the lease of such Equipment and such terms, Lessee shall be solely responsible for the ordering of the Equipment and the delivery and installation thereof. Lessor shall furnish to Lessee a Schedule relating to such Equipment, which shall become effective upon the execution and delivery of such Schedule, all documents contemplated hereby and thereby with respect to such Schedule, and the earlier of Lessee's written acceptance of such Equipment or the deposit into escrow of moneys to pay for such Equipment as provided in Section 2.02. Nothing herein shall obligate Lessor to lease any Equipment to Lessee until Lessor shall have concurred in writing to the lease of such Equipment. Section 3.02. Rental Payments. Lessee shall promptly pay Rental Payments under each Schedule, from any and all legally available funds, exclusively to Lessor or its assignees, in lawful money of the United States of America. The Rental Payments shall be sent to the location specified by the Lessor or its assignees. The Rental Payments shall constitute a current expense of the Lessee and shall not constitute an indebtedness of the Lessee. Lessor shall have the option to charge interest at the highest lawful rate on any Rental Payment received later than the due date. The Rental Payments will be payable without notice or demand. Section 3.03. Rental Payments Unconditional. Except as provided under Section 4.01, THE OBLIGATIONS OF LESSEE TO MAKE RENTAL PAYMENTS AND TO PERFORM AND OBSERVE THE OTHER COVENANTS CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE ABSOLUTE AND UNCONDITIONAL IN ALL EVENTS WITHOUT ABATEMENT, DIMINUTION, DEDUCTION, SET-OFF OR DEFENSE. Section 3.04. Purchase Option Price. With respect to each Schedule, upon 30 days written notice, Lessee shall have the option to pay, in addition to any 94 Rental Payment due thereunder, the corresponding Purchase Option Price which is listed on the same line on Exhibit B to such Schedule. If Lessee chooses this option and pays the Purchase Option Price to Lessor then Lessor will transfer any and all of its rights, title and interest in the Equipment subject to such Lease to Lessee. Section 3.05. Lease Term. The Lease Term of each Lease shall be the Original Term and all Renewal Terms thereunder until all the Rental Payments due thereunder are paid as set forth in the applicable Schedule except as provided under Section 4.01 and Section 9.01 below. If, after the end of the budgeting process which occurs at the end of the Original Term or any Renewal Term, Lessee has not terminated a Lease pursuant to Section 4.01 hereof then the Lease Term for such Lease shall be extended into the next Renewal Term and the Lessee shall be obligated to make the Rental Payments that come due during such Renewal Term. Section 3.06. Disclaimer of Warranties. LESSOR MAKES NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE VALUE, DESIGN, CONDITION, MERCHANTABILITY, AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR ANY OTHER WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO THE EQUIPMENT. LESSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE ARISING OUT OF THE INSTALLATION, OPERATION, POSSESSION, STORAGE OR USE OF THE EQUIPMENT BY LESSEE. IV. Non-Appropriation Section 4.01. Non-Appropriation. If insufficient funds are available in Lessee’s budget for the next Budget Year to make the Rental Payments for the next Renewal Term under any Lease, then Lessee shall have the option to non-appropriate the funds to pay the Rental Payments for the next Renewal Term with respect to such Lease. Lack of a sufficient appropriation shall be evidenced by the passage of an ordinance or resolution by the governing body of Lessee specifically prohibiting Lessee from performing its obligations under such Lease for a designated Budget Year and all subsequent Budget Years. If Lessee chooses this option, then all obligations of the Lessee under such Lease regarding Rental Payments for all remaining Renewal Terms shall be terminated at the end of the then current Original Term or Renewal Term without penalty or liability to the Lessee of any kind provided that if Lessee has not delivered possession of the Equipment subject to such Lease to Lessor as provided herein and conveyed to Lessor or released its interest in such Equipment by the end of the last Budget Year for which Rental Payments were paid, the termination shall nevertheless be effective but Lessee shall be responsible for the payment of damages in an amount equal to the amount of the Rental Payments thereafter coming due under Exhibit “B” to the Schedule for such Lease which are attributable to the number of days after such Budget Year during which Lessee fails to take such actions and for any other loss suffered by Lessor as a result of Lessee’s failure to take such actions as required. Lessee shall immediately notify the Lessor as soon as the decision to non-appropriate is made. If such non-appropriation occurs, then Lessee shall deliver the Equipment to Lessor or to a location designated by Lessor at Lessee’s expense. Lessee shall be liable for all damage to the Equipment other than normal wear and tear. If Lessee fails to deliver such Equipment to Lessor, then Lessor may enter the premises where such Equipment is located and take possession of the Equipment and charge Lessee for costs incurred. V. Insurance, Damage, Insufficiency of Proceeds, Lessee Negligence Section 5.01. Insurance. Lessee shall maintain both casualty insurance and liability insurance at its own expense with respect to the Equipment. Lessee shall be solely responsible for selecting the insurer(s) and for making all premium payments and ensuring that all policies are continuously kept in effect during the term of any Lease. Lessee shall provide Lessor with a Certificate of Insurance, which lists the Lessor and/or assigns as a loss payee and an additional insured on the policies with respect to the Equipment. (a) Lessee shall insure the Equipment against any loss or damage by fire and all other risks covered by the standard extended coverage endorsement then in use in the State and any other risks reasonably required by Lessor in an amount at least equal to the then applicable Purchase Option Price of the Equipment. Alternatively, Lessee may insure the Equipment under a blanket insurance policy or policies. (b) The liability insurance shall insure Lessor from liability and property damage in any form and amount satisfactory to Lessor. (c) Provided that, with Lessor's prior written consent, Lessee may self-insure against the risks described in (a) and (b) above. Lessee shall furnish Lessor evidence of such self-insurance coverage throughout each Lease Term. Lessee shall not materially modify or cancel such self-insurance coverage without first giving written notice thereof to Lessor at least 10 days in advance of such cancellation or modification. (d) All insurance policies issued or affected by this Section shall be so written or endorsed such that the Lessor and its assignees are named additional insured and loss payees and that all losses are payable to Lessee and Lessor or its assignees as their interests may appear. Each policy issued or affected by this Section shall contain a provision that the insurance company shall not cancel or materially modify the policy without first giving thirty 30 days advance notice to Lessor or its assignees. Lessee shall furnish to Lessor certificates evidencing such coverage throughout each Lease Term. Section 5.02. Damage to or Destruction of Equipment. Lessee assumes the risk of loss or damage to the Equipment. If the Equipment or any portion thereof is lost, stolen, damaged, or destroyed by fire or other casualty, Lessee will immediately report all such losses to all possible insurers and take the proper procedures to attain all insurance proceeds. At the option of Lessor, Lessee shall either (1) apply the Net Proceeds to replace, repair or restore the Equipment or (2) apply the Net Proceeds to the applicable Purchase Option Price. For purposes of this Section and Section 5.03, the term Net Proceeds shall mean the amount of insurance proceeds collected from all applicable insurance policies after deducting all expenses incurred in the collection thereof. Section 5.03. Insufficiency of Net Proceeds. If there are no Net Proceeds for whatever reason or if the Net Proceeds are insufficient to pay in full the cost of any replacement, repair, restoration, modification or improvement of the Equipment, then Lessee shall, at the option of Lessor, either complete such replacement, repair, restoration, modification or improvement and pay any costs thereof in excess of the amount of the Net Proceeds or apply the Net Proceeds to the Purchase Option Price and pay the deficiency, if any, to the Lessor. Section 5.04. Lessee Negligence. Lessee assumes all risks and liabilities, whether or not covered by insurance, for loss or damage to the Equipment and for injury to or death of any person or damage to any property whether such injury or death be with respect to agents or employees of Lessee or of third parties, and whether such property damage be to Lessee’s property or the property of others including, without limitation, liabilities for loss or damage related to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act or similar or successor law or any state or local equivalent now existing or hereinafter enacted which in any manner arise out of or are incident to any possession, use, operation, condition or storage of any Equipment by Lessee which is proximately caused by the negligent conduct of Lessee, its officers, employees and agents. Lessee hereby assumes responsibility for and agrees to reimburse Lessor for all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, claims, actions, costs and expenses including reasonable attorneys’ fees of whatsoever kind and nature, imposed on, incurred by or asserted against Lessor that in any way relate to or arise out of a claim, suit or proceeding, based in whole or in part upon the negligent conduct of Lessee, its officers, employees and agents, to the maximum extent permitted by law. VI. Title and Security Interest Section 6.01. Title. Title to the Equipment shall vest in Lessee when Lessee acquires and accepts the Equipment. Title to the Equipment subject to a Lease will automatically transfer to the Lessor in the event Lessee non-appropriates under Section 4.01 with respect to such Lease or in the event Lessee defaults under Section 9.01 with respect to such Lease. In either of such events, Lessee shall execute and deliver to Lessor such documents as Lessor may request to evidence the passage of legal title to the Equipment subject to such Lease to Lessor. Section 6.02. Security Interest. To secure the payment of all Lessee’s obligations under each Lease, Lessee hereby grants to Lessor a security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code constituting a first lien on the Equipment described more fully on Exhibit “A” to each Schedule. The security interest established by this section includes not only all additions, attachments, repairs and replacements to the Equipment but also all proceeds therefrom. Lessee agrees that Lessor or its assignee may execute such additional documents including financing statements, affidavits, notices, and similar instruments, for and on behalf of Lessee which Lessor deems necessary or appropriate to protect Lessor’s interest in the Equipment and in this Agreement and each Lease. Lessee authorizes Lessor to record such documentation as necessary for Lessor to perfect its security interest. Section 6.03. Personal Property. The Equipment is and shall at all times be and remain personal property notwithstanding that the Equipment or any part thereof may be or hereafter become in any manner affixed or attached to or embedded in or permanently rested upon real property or any building thereon or attached in any manner to what is permanent by means of cement, plaster, nails, bolts, screws or otherwise. 95 3 VII. Assignment Section 7.01. Assignment by Lessor. All of Lessor’s rights, title and/or interest in and to each Lease may be assigned and reassigned in whole or in part to one or more assignees or sub-assignees (including a registered owner for lease participation certificates) by Lessor at any time without the consent of Lessee. No such assignment shall be effective as against Lessee until the assignor shall have filed with Lessee written notice of assignment identifying the assignee. Lessee shall pay all Rental Payments due under each Lease to or at the direction of Lessor or the assignee named in the notice of assignment. Lessee shall keep a complete and accurate record of all such assignments. Section 7.02. Assignment by Lessee. None of Lessee’s right, title and interest under this Agreement, each Lease and in the Equipment may be assigned by Lessee unless Lessor approves of such assignment in writing before such assignment occurs and only after Lessee first obtains an opinion from nationally recognized counsel stating that such assignment will not jeopardize the tax-exempt status of the obligation. VIII. Maintenance of Equipment Section 8.01. Lessee shall keep the Equipment in good repair and working order. Lessor shall have no obligation to inspect, test, service, maintain, repair or make improvements or additions to the Equipment under any circumstances. Lessee will be liable for all damage to the Equipment, other than normal wear and tear, caused by Lessee, its employees or its agents. Lessee shall pay for and obtain all permits, licenses and taxes necessary for the installation, operation, possession, storage or use of the Equipment. If the Equipment includes any titled vehicles, then Lessee is responsible for obtaining such titles from the State and also for ensuring that Lessor is listed as first lien holder on all of the titles. Lessee shall not use the Equipment to haul, convey or transport hazardous waste as defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et. seq. Lessee shall not during the term of this Agreement create, incur or assume any levies, liens or encumbrances of any kind with respect to the Equipment except those created by this Agreement. The Equipment is and shall at all times be and remain personal property. Lessee shall allow Lessor to examine and inspect the Equipment at all reasonable times. IX. Default Section 9.01. Events of Default defined. The following events shall constitute an “Event of Default” with respect to a Lease: (a) Failure by Lessee to pay any Rental Payment listed on Exhibit “B” to the Schedule for fifteen 15 days after such payment is due according to the Payment Date listed on Exhibit “B”. (b) Failure to pay any other payment required to be paid under this Agreement and the Schedule at the time specified herein and therein and a continuation of said failure for a period of fifteen 15 days after written notice by Lessor that such payment must be made. If Lessee continues to fail to pay any payment after such period, then Lessor may, but will not be obligated to, make such payments and charge Lessee for all costs incurred plus interest at the highest lawful rate. (c) Failure by Lessee to observe and perform any warranty, covenant, condition, promise or duty under this Agreement or the Schedule for a period of thirty 30 days after written notice specifying such failure is given to Lessee by Lessor, unless Lessor agrees in writing to an extension of time. Lessor will not unreasonably withhold its consent to an extension of time if corrective action is instituted by Lessee. Subsection (c) does not apply to Rental Payments and other payments discussed above. (d) Any statement, material omission, representation or warranty made by Lessee in or pursuant to this Agreement or the Schedule which proves to be false, incorrect or misleading on the date when made regardless of Lessee’s intent and which materially adversely affects the rights or security of Lessor under this Agreement or the applicable Schedule. (e) Any provision of this Agreement or the Schedule which ceases to be valid for whatever reason and the loss of such provision, would materially adversely affect the rights or security of Lessor. (f) Lessee admits in writing its inability to pay its obligations. Lessee defaults on one or more of its other obligations. Lessee applies or consents to the appointment of a receiver or a custodian to manage its affairs. Lessee makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. Section 9.02. Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default exists with respect to any Lease, Lessor shall have the right to take one or any combination of the following remedial steps: (a) With or without terminating the Lease, Lessor may declare all Rental Payments and other amounts payable by Lessee thereunder to the end of the then current Budget Year to be immediately due and payable. (b) With or without terminating the Lease, Lessor may require Lessee at Lessee’s expense to redeliver any or all of the Equipment subject thereto to Lessor to a location specified by Lessor. Such delivery shall take place within 15 days after the event of default occurs. If Lessee fails to deliver such Equipment, Lessor may enter the premises where such Equipment is located and take possession of such Equipment and charge Lessee for cost incurred. Notwithstanding that Lessor has taken possession of such Equipment, Lessee shall still be obligated to pay the remaining Rental Payments under the Lease due up until the end of the then current Original Term or Renewal Term. Lessee will be liable for any damage to such Equipment caused by Lessee or its employees or agents. (c) Lessor may take whatever action at law or in equity that may appear necessary or desirable to enforce its rights. Section 9.03. No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to Lessor is intended to be exclusive and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under the Lease now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, X. Miscellaneous Section 10.01. Notices. All notices shall be sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when delivered or mailed by registered mail, postage prepaid, to the parties at their respective places of business as first set forth herein or as the parties shall designate hereafter in writing. Section 10.02. Binding Effect. This Agreement and each Schedule shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon Lessee and Lessor and their respective successors and assigns. Section 10.03. Sever ability. In the event any provision of this Agreement or any Lease shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. Section 10.04. Amendments, Addenda, Changes or Modifications. This Agreement and each Lease may be amended, added to, changed or modified by written agreement duly executed by Lessor and Lessee. Section 10.05. Execution in Counterparts; Electronic Execution. This Agreement and each Lease may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Consent to Electronic Signatures: Lessor and Lessee consent to execute this Agreement and all necessary Exhibits electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. Section 10.06. Captions. The captions or headings in this Agreement do not define, limit or describe the scope or intent of any provisions or sections of this Agreement. 96 Section 10.07. Entire Writing. This Agreement and all Schedules executed hereunder constitute the entire writing between Lessor and Lessee. No waiver, consent, modification or change of terms of this Agreement or any Lease shall bind either party unless in writing and signed by both parties, and then such waiver, consent, modification or change shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose given. There are no understandings, agreements, representations, conditions, or warranties, express or implied, which are not specified herein regarding this Agreement or any Lease or the Equipment leased thereunder. Any terms and conditions of any purchase order or other documents submitted by Lessee in connection with this Agreement which are in addition to or inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement or any Lease will not be binding on Lessor and will not apply to this Agreement or any Lease. Section 10.08. Jurisdiction and Venue. Lessor and Lessee agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. Lessee hereby consents to any and all process which may be served in any such suit, action or proceeding, (i) by mailing a copy thereof by registered and certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the Lessee's address shown in this Agreement or as notified to the Lessor and (ii) by serving the same upon the Lessee in any other manner otherwise permitted by law, and agrees that such service shall in every respect be deemed effective service upon Lessee.. Lessor and Lessee have caused this Agreement to be executed in their names by their duly authorized representatives listed below. Lessee: City of Bozeman Lessor: Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital By: By: Typed: Jeff Mihelich Print: Title: City Manager Title: Date: __________________________________ Date: _________________________________ 97 EXHIBIT A A DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT OF LEASE AGREEMENT RE: Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of 2/3/2023 between Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor) and City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Schedule No. 001 thereto dated as of February 3, 2023. Below is a detailed description of all the items of Equipment including quantity, model number and serial number where applicable: Quantity 1 VIN #/Serial Number 4MH12000 Type, Make, Model 2022 Elgin Broom Bear EQUIPMENT LOCATION Complete only if equipment will not be located at Lessee’s address BILLING ADDRESS: 121 N Rouse Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 GARAGING ADDRESS: 814 N Bozeman Ave Bozeman, MT 59715 Lessee authorizes Lessor or its assigns to insert or modify, if needed, the Vehicle Identification Number (“VIN”), or Serial Number, in the above description of the Equipment to correspond to the final delivered and accepted Equipment as shown on the respective invoice or other supporting documents. Lessee: City of Bozeman Lessor: Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital By: By: Typed: Jeff Mihelich Print: Title: City Manager Title: Date: __________________________________ Date: __________________________________ 98 EXHIBIT B B SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS Interest Rate = 6.612% Amount Financed = $277,720.00 Start Date = 2/17/2023 Number Date Payment Interest Principal Purchase Option* 1 4/1/2023 $63,370.03 $2,193.21 $61,176.82 N/A 2 4/1/2024 $63,370.03 $14,317.00 $49,053.03 $176,300.13 3 4/1/2025 $63,370.03 $11,073.80 $52,296.23 $121,253.12 4 4/1/2026 $63,370.03 $7,616.18 $55,753.85 $62,566.62 5 4/1/2027 $63,370.03 $3,929.96 $59,440.07 $0.00 *Assumes that all rental payments and other amounts due on and prior to that date have been paid. Lessee: City of Bozeman BY: TYPED: Jeff Mihelich TITLE: City Manager DATE: 99 EXHIBIT E E LESSEE RESOLUTION Re: Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of 2/3/2023, between Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor) and City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Schedule No. 001 thereto dated as of February 3, 2023. At a duly called meeting of the Governing Body of the Lessee (as defined in the Agreement) held on ____________________, 20___ the following resolution was introduced and adopted: BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Body of Lessee as follows: 1. Determination of Need. The Governing Body of Lessee has determined that a true and very real need exists for the acquisition of the Equipment described on Exhibit A of Schedule No. 001 to the Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of 2/3/2023, between City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor). 2. Approval and Authorization. The Governing Body of Lessee has determined that the Agreement and Schedule, substantially in the form presented to this meeting, are in the best interests of the Lessee for the acquisition of such Equipment, and the Governing Body hereby approves the entering into of the Agreement and Schedule by the Lessee and hereby designates and authorizes the following person(s) to execute and deliver the Agreement and Schedule on Lessee’s behalf with such changes thereto as such person(s) deem(s) appropriate, and any related documents, including any Escrow Agreement, necessary to the consummation of the transaction contemplated by the Agreement and Schedule. The City of Bozeman is authorized to enter into the lease/purchase financing with Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital to finance their 2022 Elgin Broom Bear from Joe Johnson Equipment LLC in the amount of $277,720.00 with 5 annual payments of $63,370.03. Authorized Individual(s): Jeff Mihelich - City Manager (Printed or Typed Name and Title of individual(s) authorized to execute the Agreement) 3. Adoption of Resolution. The signatures below from the designated individuals from the Governing Body of the Lessee evidence the adoption by the Governing Body of this Resolution. By: (Signature of Secretary, Board Chairman or other member of the Governing Body) Print Name: Title: (Print name of individual who signed directly above) (Title of individual who signed directly above) Attested By: (Signature of one additional person who can witness the passage of this Resolution) Print Name: Title: (Print name of individual who signed directly above) (Title of individual who signed directly above) 100 EXHIBIT F F BANK QUALIFIED CERTIFICATE Re: Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of 2/3/2023, between Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor) and City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Schedule No. 001 thereto dated as of February 3, 2023. Whereas, Lessee hereby represents that it is a “Bank Qualified” Issuer for the calendar year in which this Agreement and Schedule are executed by making the following designations with respect to Section 265 of the Internal Revenue Code. (A “Bank Qualified Issuer” is an issuer that issues less than ten million ($10,000,000) dollars of tax-exempt obligations during the calendar year). Now, therefore, Lessee hereby designates this Agreement and Schedule as follows: 1. Designation as Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. Pursuant to Section 265(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the “Code”), the Lessee hereby specifically designates the Agreement and this Schedule as a “qualified tax-exempt obligation” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. In compliance with Section 265(b)(3)(D) of the Code, the Lessee hereby represents that the Lessee will not designate more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the Lessee in the calendar year during which the Agreement is executed and delivered as such “qualified tax-exempt obligations”. 2. Issuance Limitation. In compliance with the requirements of Section 265(b)(3)(C) of the Code, the Lessee hereby represents that the Lessee (including all subordinate entities of the Lessee within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3)(E) of the Code) reasonable anticipates not to issue in the calendar year during which the Agreement and Supplement are executed and delivered, obligations bearing interest exempt from federal income taxation under Section 103 of the Code (other than “private activity bonds” as defined in Section 141 of the Code) in an amount greater than $10,000,000. By: (Signature of individual authorized to execute this Exhibit) Typed Name: Jeff Mihelich (Typed name of individual who signed directly above) 101 EXHIBIT G G AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE Lessee: City of Bozeman Lessor: Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital AOIA Address: 121 N Rouse Ave Address: 510 22nd Ave E., Ste 501 Bozeman, MT 59715 Alexandria, MN 56308 Phone: (406) 582-3206 Phone: (320) 763-7600 Description of Equipment: Quantity 1 VIN #/Serial Number 4MH12000 Type, Make, Model 2022 Elgin Broom Bear Value: $304,970.00 I understand that to provide protection from serious financial loss, should an accident or loss occur, my lease contract requires the equipment to be continuously covered with insurance against the risks of fire and theft, and that failure to provide such insurance gives the Lessor the right to declare the entire unpaid balance immediately due and payable. Accordingly, I have arranged for the required insurance through the insurance company shown below and have requested my agent to note Lessor’s interest in the equipment and name Lessor as additional insured. NAME OF AGENT INSURANCE COMPANY Name: Name: Address: Policy #: Phone: Lessee: City of Bozeman BY: TYPED: Jeff Mihelich TITLE: City Manager DATE: 102 EXHIBIT H H LESSEE CERTIFICATE RE: Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of 2/3/2023 between Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor) and City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Schedule No. 001 thereto dated as of February 3, 2023. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am a duly qualified representative of Lessee and that I have been given the authority by the Governing Body of Lessee to sign this Certificate of Acceptance with respect to the above referenced Master Lease Purchase Agreement (the “Lease”). I hereby certify that: 1. Lessee has appropriated and/or taken other lawful actions necessary to provide moneys sufficient to pay all Rental Payments required to be paid under the Lease during the current Budget Year of Lessee, and such moneys will be applied in payment of all Rental Payments due and payable during such current Budget Year. 2. The governing body of Lessee has approved the authorization, execution and delivery of the Lease on its behalf by the authorized representative of Lessee who signed the Lease. 3. During the term of the Lease, the Equipment will be used for essential governmental functions. Such functions are: ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 4. The source of funds (fund Item in budget) for the Rental Payments that come due under Exhibit B of this Lease is as follows: ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 5. Lessee reasonably expects and anticipates that adequate funds will be available for all future Rental Payments that will come due under Exhibit B because: ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Lessee: City of Bozeman BY: TYPED: Jeff Mihelich TITLE: City Manager DATE: 103 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND LETTER OF DIRECTION Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital ("Lessor") hereby gives notice to City of Bozeman (“Lessee”) that it has assigned all of its rights to receive payments under the Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated February 3, 2023, Schedule No. 001 as set out in Section 7.01, and in any of the Equipment now or hereafter leased thereunder, including without limitation all amounts of rent, insurance, and condemnation proceeds, indemnity or other payment proceeds due to become due as a result of the sale, lease of other disposition of the Equipment, all rights to receive notices and give consents and to exercise the rights of the Lessor under the Lease, and all rights, claims and causes of action which Assignor may have against the manufacturer or seller of the Equipment in respect of any defects therein. This Master Lease Purchase Agreement requires 5 annual payments of $63,370.03. As of the date of assignment, 5 annual payments of $63,370.03 remain on the contract and should be forwarded to the assignee at the following address: “ASSIGNEE” Santander Bank, N.A. P. O. Box 847386 Boston, MA 02284-7386 1-800-238-4009 FEIN: 23-1237295 * Please list the following as lien holder on vehicle titles: Santander Bank, N.A. 3 Huntington Quadrangle, #101N Melville, NY 11747 Any assigned payments received by Lessor are received in trust for assignee and will be immediately delivered to Assignee. LEASE SERVICING CENTER, INC. DBA CITY OF BOZEMAN NCL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL (Lessor/Assignor) (Lessee) BY: ___________________________ BY: _____________________________ PRINT: TYPED: Jeff Mihelich TITLE: TITLE: City Manager DATE: __________________________ DATE: _____________________________ 104 Internal Escrow Letter 2/3/2023 Santander Bank, N.A. 3 Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 101N Melville, NY 11747 RE: Schedule No. 001 dated February 3, 2023 to Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of 2/3/2023 (the “Lease”), between City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Lease Servicing Center Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor), concurrently assigned to Santander Bank, N.A. (“Assignee”). Ladies and Gentlemen: We have entered into the above referenced Lease for the purpose of financing the equipment listed in Attachment #1 (the "Equipment") in the amount of $277,720.00 (the "Financed Amount"). Lessee hereby requests that Lessor retain $277,720.00 (the "Retained Amount"). Lessee further requests that Lessor hold the Retained Amount in an internal escrow pending Lessor's receipt of confirmation from Lessee that the Equipment has been delivered, inspected and accepted for all purposes by the Lessee and that payment can be remitted to the vendor of such Equipment. There will be no separate escrow fee charged to Lessee for internally escrowing the Retained Amount. Lessee understands and agrees that interest shall accrue on the entire Financed Amount as of the date hereof, and further understands and agrees that any interest earned on the Retained Amount shall be paid to Lessor in consideration of managing the internal escrow account. Lessee acknowledges that Lessor may commingle the Retained Amount held by Lessor for the benefit of Lessee with other funds held by Lessor for its own account, so long as Lessor maintains segregation of such amounts on the books and records of Lessor. Sincerely, Lessee: City of Bozeman BY: TYPED: Jeff Mihelich TITLE: City Manager DATE: 105 Internal Escrow Letter Attachment #1 Quantity Year Make Type/Style/Model VIN/Serial Number Price 1 2022 Elgin Broom Bear 4MH12000 $277,720.00 Total Cost: $277,720.00 Down Payment $0 Total Amount Financed $277,720.00 106 LEASE PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS Lessee: ___________________________________________________________________ Tax ID#: ___________________________________________________________________ Invoice Mailing Address: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Mail invoices to the attention of: __________________________ Phone: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ Email: _____________________ Approval of Invoices required by: __________________________ Phone: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ Email: _____________________ Accounts Payable Contact: __________________________ Phone: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ Email: _____________________ Processing time for Invoices: ______ Approval: _________Checks: _________ Do you have a Purchase Order Number that you would like included on the invoice? No __ Yes __ PO# ___________________ Description needed for Lease Payment Invoices (up to 54 characters including a PO#) : ___________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Does your PO# change annually? No ____ Yes ____ Processing time for new purchase orders:____________ 107 EXHIBIT C-1 PAYMENT REQUEST AND PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE RE: Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of February 3, 2023, between Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor) and City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Schedule No. 001 thereto. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am a duly qualified representative of Lessee and that I have been given the authority by the Governing Body of Lessee to sign this Certificate of Acceptance with respect to the above referenced Master Lease Purchase Agreement and Schedule No. 001 (the “Lease”). I hereby certify that: 1. The Equipment described below (comprising part of the Equipment described on Lease Exhibit A) has been delivered and installed in accordance with Lessee’s specifications and Lessee hereby requests and authorizes Lessor to disburse, or direct the escrow agent to disburse, to Lessee or the vendor described below net proceeds of the Lease in the amount specified by wire transfer or by check. Such amount has not formed the basis for a previous request for payment. 2. Lessee has conducted such inspection and/or testing of such Equipment as it deems necessary and appropriate and hereby acknowledges that it accepts such Equipment for all purposes. 3. Rental Payments are due and owing as set forth in Exhibit B to the Lease. 4. Lessee has obtained insurance coverage as required under the Lease. 5. Lessee is exempt from all personal property taxes and is also exempt from sales and/or use taxes with respect to the Equipment and the Rental Payments. 6. No event or condition that constitutes or would constitute an Event of Default exists as of the date hereof. Quantity Year Make Type/Style/Model VIN/Serial Number Price 1 2022 Elgin Broom Bear 4MH12000 $277,720.00 Total Cost: $277,720.00 Down Payment $0 Total Amount Financed $277,720.00 Vendor Name and Address: Joe Johnson Equipment LLC 62 LaGrange Ave Rochester, NY 14613 Vendor Federal ID Number: Lessee: City of Bozeman BY: TYPED: Jeff Mihelich TITLE: City Manager DATE: 108 EXHIBIT C-2 FINAL ACCEPTANCE Re: Master Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of 2/3/2023, between Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (Lessor) and City of Bozeman (Lessee) and Schedule No. 001 thereto. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am a duly qualified representative of Lessee and that I have been given the authority by the Governing Body of Lessee to sign this Final Acceptance Certificate with respect to the above referenced Master Lease Purchase Agreement and Schedule No. 001 (the “Lease”). I hereby certify that: 1. All Equipment described on Exhibit A has been delivered and installed in accordance with Lessee’s specifications and Lessee hereby requests and authorizes Lessor to direct the escrow agent to apply the remaining net proceeds of the Lease to Lessee’s next Rental Payment due. 2. Lessee has conducted such inspection and/or testing of the Equipment as it deems necessary and appropriate and hereby acknowledges that it accepts the Equipment for all purposes. 3. Rental Payments with respect to such Equipment are due and owing as set forth in Exhibit B to the Lease. 4. Lessee has obtained insurance coverage as required under the Lease. 5. Lessee is exempt from all personal property taxes and is also exempt from sales and/or use taxes with respect to the Equipment and the Rental Payments. 6. No event or condition that constitutes or would constitute an Event of Default exists as of the date hereof. Lessee: City of Bozeman BY: TYPED: Jeff Mihelich TITLE: City Manager DATE: 109 Form 8038-G (Rev. September 2011) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations ▶ Under Internal Revenue Code section 149(e) ▶ See separate instructions. Caution: If the issue price is under $100,000, use Form 8038-GC. OMB No. 1545-0720 Part I Reporting Authority If Amended Return, check here ▶ 1 Issuer’s name 2 Issuer’s employer identification number (EIN) 3a Name of person (other than issuer) with whom the IRS may communicate about this return (see instructions)3b Telephone number of other person shown on 3a 4 Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address)Room/suite 5 Report number (For IRS Use Only) 3 6 City, town, or post office, state, and ZIP code 7 Date of issue 8 Name of issue 9 CUSIP number 10a Name and title of officer or other employee of the issuer whom the IRS may call for more information (see instructions) 10b Telephone number of officer or other employee shown on 10a Part II Type of Issue (enter the issue price). See the instructions and attach schedule. 11 Education ..............................11 12 Health and hospital ..........................12 13 Transportation ............................13 14 Public safety .............................14 15 Environment (including sewage bonds) ....................15 16 Housing ..............................16 17 Utilities ..............................17 18 Other. Describe ▶18 19 If obligations are TANs or RANs, check only box 19a ............. ▶ If obligations are BANs, check only box 19b ................ ▶ 20 If obligations are in the form of a lease or installment sale, check box ........ ▶ Part III Description of Obligations. Complete for the entire issue for which this form is being filed. 21 (a) Final maturity date (b) Issue price (c) Stated redemption price at maturity (d) Weighted average maturity (e) Yield $ $ years % Part IV Uses of Proceeds of Bond Issue (including underwriters’ discount) 22 Proceeds used for accrued interest .....................22 23 Issue price of entire issue (enter amount from line 21, column (b)) ...........23 24 Proceeds used for bond issuance costs (including underwriters’ discount) ..24 25 Proceeds used for credit enhancement ............25 26 Proceeds allocated to reasonably required reserve or replacement fund .26 27 Proceeds used to currently refund prior issues .........27 28 Proceeds used to advance refund prior issues .........28 29 Total (add lines 24 through 28) .......................29 30 Nonrefunding proceeds of the issue (subtract line 29 from line 23 and enter amount here) ...30 Part V Description of Refunded Bonds. Complete this part only for refunding bonds. 31 Enter the remaining weighted average maturity of the bonds to be currently refunded .... ▶years 32 Enter the remaining weighted average maturity of the bonds to be advance refunded .... ▶years 33 Enter the last date on which the refunded bonds will be called (MM/DD/YYYY) ...... ▶ 34 Enter the date(s) the refunded bonds were issued ▶ (MM/DD/YYYY) For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions.Cat. No. 63773S Form 8038-G (Rev. 9-2011) 110 Form 8038-G (Rev. 9-2011)Page 2 Part VI Miscellaneous 35 Enter the amount of the state volume cap allocated to the issue under section 141(b)(5) ....35 36 a Enter the amount of gross proceeds invested or to be invested in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC) (see instructions) .........................36a b Enter the final maturity date of the GIC ▶ c Enter the name of the GIC provider ▶ 37 Pooled financings: Enter the amount of the proceeds of this issue that are to be used to make loans to other governmental units ........................37 38 a If this issue is a loan made from the proceeds of another tax-exempt issue, check box ▶and enter the following information: b Enter the date of the master pool obligation ▶ c Enter the EIN of the issuer of the master pool obligation ▶ d Enter the name of the issuer of the master pool obligation ▶ 39 If the issuer has designated the issue under section 265(b)(3)(B)(i)(III) (small issuer exception), check box .... ▶ 40 If the issuer has elected to pay a penalty in lieu of arbitrage rebate, check box ............. ▶ 41 a If the issuer has identified a hedge, check here ▶and enter the following information: b Name of hedge provider ▶ c Type of hedge ▶ d Term of hedge ▶ 42 If the issuer has superintegrated the hedge, check box ..................... ▶ 43 If the issuer has established written procedures to ensure that all nonqualified bonds of this issue are remediated according to the requirements under the Code and Regulations (see instructions), check box ........ ▶ 44 If the issuer has established written procedures to monitor the requirements of section 148, check box ..... ▶ 45a If some portion of the proceeds was used to reimburse expenditures, check here ▶and enter the amount of reimbursement ......... ▶ b Enter the date the official intent was adopted ▶ Signature and Consent Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete. I further declare that I consent to the IRS’s disclosure of the issuer’s return information, as necessary to process this return, to the person that I have authorized above.▲Signature of issuer’s authorized representative Date ▲Type or print name and title Paid Preparer Use Only Print/Type preparer’s name Preparer's signature Date Check if self-employed PTIN Firm’s name ▶ Firm's address ▶ Firm's EIN ▶ Phone no. Form 8038-G (Rev. 9-2011) 111 Userid: CPM Schema: instrx Leadpct: 100%Pt. size: 9 Draft Ok to PrintAH XSL/XML Fileid: Instructions/I8038G/201209/A/XML/Cycle04/source (Init. & Date) _______Page 1 of 4 14:33 - 10-Aug-2012The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Instructions for Form 8038-G(Rev. September 2012) (Use with the September 2011 revision of Form 8038-G.) Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations Department of the TreasuryInternal Revenue Service Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted. General Instructions Purpose of Form Form 8038-G is used by issuers of tax-exempt governmental obligations to provide the IRS with the information required by section 149(e) and to monitor the requirements of sections 141 through 150. Who Must File IF the issue price (line 21, column (b)) is... THEN, for tax-exempt governmental obligations issued after December 31, 1986, issuers must file... $100,000 or more A separate Form 8038-G for each issue Less than $100,000 Form 8038-GC, Information Return for Small Tax-Exempt Governmental Bond Issues, Leases, and Installment Sales For all build America bonds and recovery zone economic development bonds use Form 8038-B, Information Return for Build America Bonds and Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds. For tax credit bonds and specified tax credit bonds use Form 8038-TC, Information Return for Tax Credit Bonds and Specified Tax Credit Bonds. When To File File Form 8038-G on or before the 15th day of the 2nd calendar month after the close of the calendar quarter in which the bond is issued. Form 8038-G may not be filed before the issue date and must be completed based on the facts as of the issue date. Late filing. An issuer may be granted an extension of time to file Form 8038-G under Section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2002-48, 2002-37 I.R.B. 531, if it is determined that the failure to file timely is not due to willful neglect. Type or print at the top of the form “Request for Relief under section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2002-48” and attach a letter explaining why Form 8038-G was not submitted to the IRS on time. Also indicate whether the bond issue in question is under examination by the IRS. Do not CAUTION ! submit copies of the trust indenture or other bond documents. See Where To File next. Where To File File Form 8038-G, and any attachments, with the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Center, Ogden, UT 84201. Private delivery services. You can use certain private delivery services designated by the IRS to meet the “timely mailing as timely filing/paying” rule for tax returns and payments. These private delivery services include only the following:DHL Express (DHL): DHL Same Day Service.Federal Express (FedEx): FedEx Priority Overnight, FedEx Standard Overnight, FedEx 2Day, FedEx International Priority, and FedEx International First.United Parcel Service (UPS): UPS Next Day Air, UPS Next Day Air Saver, UPS 2nd Day Air, UPS 2nd Day Air A.M., UPS Worldwide Express Plus, and UPS Worldwide Express. The private delivery service can tell you how to get written proof of the mailing date. Other Forms That May Be Required For rebating arbitrage (or paying a penalty in lieu of arbitrage rebate) to the Federal government, use Form 8038-T, Arbitrage Rebate, Yield Reduction and Penalty in Lieu of Arbitrage Rebate. For private activity bonds, use Form 8038, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues. For build America bonds (Direct Pay), build America bonds (Tax Credit), and recovery zone economic development bonds, complete Form 8038-B, Information Return for Build America Bonds and Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds. For qualified forestry conservation bonds, new clean renewable energy bonds, qualified energy conservation bonds, qualified zone academy bonds, qualified school construction bonds, clean renewable energy bonds, and all other qualified tax credit bonds (except build America bonds), file Form 8038-TC, Information Return for Tax Credit Bonds and Specified Tax Credit Bonds. Rounding to Whole Dollars You may show amounts on this return as whole dollars. To do so, drop amounts less than 50 cents and increase amounts from 50 cents through 99 cents to the next higher dollar. Questions on Filing Form 8038-G For specific questions on how to file Form 8038-G send an email to the IRS at TaxExemptBondQuestions@irs.gov and put “Form 8038-G Question” in the subject line. In the email include a description of your question, a return email address, the name of a contact person, and a telephone number. Definitions Tax-exempt obligation. This is any obligation, including a bond, installment purchase agreement, or financial lease, on which the interest is excluded from income under section 103. Tax-exempt governmental obligation. A tax-exempt obligation that is not a private activity bond (see next) is a tax-exempt governmental obligation. This includes a bond issued by a qualified volunteer fire department under section 150(e). Private activity bond. This includes an obligation issued as part of an issue in which:More than 10% of the proceeds are to be used for any private activity business use, andMore than 10% of the payment of principal or interest of the issue is either (a) secured by an interest in property to be used for a private business use (or payments for such property) or (b) to be derived from payments for property (or borrowed money) used for a private business use. It also includes a bond, the proceeds of which (a) are to be used directly or indirectly to make or finance loans (other than loans described in section 141(c)(2)) to persons other than governmental units and (b) exceeds the lesser of 5% of the proceeds or $5 million. Issue price. The issue price of obligations is generally determined under Regulations section 1.148-1(b). Thus, Aug 10, 2012 Cat. No. 63774D 112 Page 2 of 4 Fileid: Instructions/I8038G/201209/A/XML/Cycle04/source 14:33 - 10-Aug-2012The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. when issued for cash, the issue price is the first price at which a substantial amount of the obligations are sold to the public. To determine the issue price of an obligation issued for property, see sections 1273 and 1274 and the related regulations. Issue. Generally, obligations are treated as part of the same issue if they are issued by the same issuer, on the same date, and in a single transaction, or a series of related transactions. However, obligations issued during the same calendar year (a) under a loan agreement under which amounts are to be advanced periodically (a “draw-down loan”) or (b) with a term not exceeding 270 days, may be treated as part of the same issue if the obligations are equally and ratably secured under a single indenture or loan agreement and are issued under a common financing arrangement (for example, under the same official statement periodically updated to reflect changing factual circumstances). Also, for obligations issued under a draw-down loan that meet the requirements of the preceding sentence, obligations issued during different calendar years may be treated as part of the same issue if all of the amounts to be advanced under the draw-down loan are reasonably expected to be advanced within 3 years of the date of issue of the first obligation. Likewise, obligations (other than private activity bonds) issued under a single agreement that is in the form of a lease or installment sale may be treated as part of the same issue if all of the property covered by that agreement is reasonably expected to be delivered within 3 years of the date of issue of the first obligation. Arbitrage rebate. Generally, interest on a state or local bond is not tax-exempt unless the issuer of the bond rebates to the United States arbitrage profits earned from investing proceeds of the bond in higher yielding nonpurpose investments. See section 148(f). Construction issue. This is an issue of tax-exempt bonds that meets both of the following conditions: 1. At least 75% of the available construction proceeds are to be used for construction expenditures with respect to property to be owned by a governmental unit or a section 501(c)(3) organization, and 2. All the bonds that are part of the issue are qualified 501(c)(3) bonds, bonds that are not private activity bonds, or private activity bonds issued to finance property to be owned by a governmental unit or a section 501(c)(3) organization. In lieu of rebating any arbitrage that may be owed to the United States, the issuer of a construction issue may make an irrevocable election to pay a penalty. The penalty is equal to 11 2% of the amount of construction proceeds that do not meet certain spending requirements. See section 148(f)(4)(C) and the Instructions for Form 8038-T. Pooled financing issue. This is an issue of tax-exempt bonds, the proceeds of which are to be used to finance purpose investments representing conduit loans to two or more conduit borrowers, unless those conduit loans are to be used to finance a single capital project. Specific Instructions Part I—Reporting Authority Amended return. An issuer may file an amended return to change or add to the information reported on a previously filed return for the same date of issue. If you are filing to correct errors or change a previously filed return, check the Amended Return box in the heading of the form. The amended return must provide all the information reported on the original return, in addition to the new or corrected information. Attach an explanation of the reason for the amended return and write across the top, “Amended Return Explanation.” Failure to attach an explanation may result in a delay in processing the form. Line 1. The issuer's name is the name of the entity issuing the obligations, not the name of the entity receiving the benefit of the financing. For a lease or installment sale, the issuer is the lessee or the purchaser. Line 2. An issuer that does not have an employer identification number (EIN) should apply for one on Form SS-4, Application for Employer Identification Number. You can get this form on the IRS website at IRS.gov or by calling 1-800-TAX-FORM (1-800-829-3676). You may receive an EIN by telephone by following the instructions for Form SS-4. Line 3a. If the issuer wishes to authorize a person other than an officer or other employee of the issuer (including a legal representative or paid preparer) to communicate with the IRS and whom the IRS may contact about this return (including in writing or by telephone), enter the name of such person here. The person listed in line 3a must be an individual. Do not enter the name and title of an officer or other employee of the issuer here (use line 10a for that purpose). Note. By authorizing a person other than an authorized officer or other employee of the issuer to communicate with the IRS and whom the IRS may contact about this return, the issuer authorizes the IRS to communicate directly with the individual entered on line 3a and consents to disclose the issuer's return information to that individual, as necessary, to process this return. Lines 4 and 6. If you listed an individual on line 3a to communicate with the IRS and whom the IRS may contact about this return, enter the number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address), city, town, or post office, state, and ZIP code of that person. Otherwise, enter the issuer's number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address), city, town, or post office, state, and ZIP code. Note. The address entered on lines 4 and 6 is the address the IRS will use for all written communications regarding the processing of this return, including any notices. Line 5. This line is for IRS use only. Do not make any entries in this box. Line 7. The date of issue is generally the date on which the issuer physically exchanges the bonds that are part of the issue for the underwriter's (or other purchaser's) funds. For a lease or installment sale, enter the date interest starts to accrue in an MM/DD/YYYY format. Line 8. If there is no name of the issue, please provide other identification of the issue. Line 9. Enter the CUSIP (Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures) number of the bond with the latest maturity. If the issue does not have a CUSIP number, write “None.” Line 10a. Enter the name and title of the officer or other employee of the issuer whom the IRS may call for more information. If the issuer wishes to designate a person other than an officer or other employee of the issuer (including a legal representative or paid preparer) whom the IRS may call for more information about the return, enter the name, title, and telephone number of such person on lines 3a and 3b. Complete lines 10a and 10b even if you complete lines 3a and 3b. Part II—Type of Issue Elections referred to in Part II are made on the original bond documents, not on this form. Identify the type of obligations issued by entering the corresponding issue price (see Issue price under Definitions earlier). Attach a schedule listing names and EINs of organizations that are to use proceeds of these obligations, if different from those CAUTION ! CAUTION ! -2-113 Page 3 of 4 Fileid: Instructions/I8038G/201209/A/XML/Cycle04/source 14:33 - 10-Aug-2012The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. of the issuer, include a brief summary of the use and indicate whether or not such user is a governmental or nongovernmental entity. Line 18. Enter a description of the issue in the space provided. Line 19. If the obligations are short-term tax anticipation notes or warrants (TANs) or short-term revenue anticipation notes or warrants (RANs), check box 19a. If the obligations are short-term bond anticipation notes (BANs), issued with the expectation that they will be refunded with the proceeds of long-term bonds at some future date, check box 19b. Do not check both boxes. Line 20. Check this box if property other than cash is exchanged for the obligation, for example, acquiring a police car, a fire truck, or telephone equipment through a series of monthly payments. (This type of obligation is sometimes referred to as a “municipal lease.”) Also check this box if real property is directly acquired in exchange for an obligation to make periodic payments of interest and principal. Do not check this box if the proceeds of the obligation are received in the form of cash, even if the term “lease” is used in the title of the issue. Part III—Description of Obligations Line 21. For column (a), the final maturity date is the last date the issuer must redeem the entire issue. For column (b), see Issue price under Definitions earlier. For column (c), the stated redemption price at maturity of the entire issue is the sum of the stated redemption prices at maturity of each bond issued as part of the issue. For a lease or installment sale, write “N/A” in column (c). For column (d), the weighted average maturity is the sum of the products of the issue price of each maturity and the number of years to maturity (determined separately for each maturity and by taking into account mandatory redemptions), divided by the issue price of the entire issue (from line 21, column (b)). For a lease or installment sale, enter instead the total number of years the lease or installment sale will be outstanding. For column (e), the yield, as defined in section 148(h), is the discount rate that, when used to compute the present value of all payments of principal and interest to be paid on the obligation, produces an amount equal to the purchase price, including accrued interest. See Regulations section 1.148-4 for specific rules to compute the yield on an issue. If the issue is a variable rate issue, write “VR” as the yield of the issue. For other than variable rate issues, carry the yield out to four decimal places (for example, 5.3125%). If the issue is a lease or installment sale, enter the effective rate of interest being paid. Part IV—Uses of Proceeds of Bond Issue For a lease or installment sale, write “N/A” in the space to the right of the title for Part IV. Line 22. Enter the amount of proceeds that will be used to pay interest from the date the bonds are dated to the date of issue. Line 24. Enter the amount of the proceeds that will be used to pay bond issuance costs, including fees for trustees and bond counsel. If no bond proceeds will be used to pay bond issuance costs, enter zero. Do not leave this line blank. Line 25. Enter the amount of the proceeds that will be used to pay fees for credit enhancement that are taken into account in determining the yield on the issue for purposes of section 148(h) (for example, bond insurance premiums and certain fees for letters of credit). Line 26. Enter the amount of proceeds that will be allocated to such a fund. Line 27. Enter the amount of the proceeds that will be used to pay principal, interest, or call premium on any other issue of bonds within 90 days of the date of issue. Line 28. Enter the amount of the proceeds that will be used to pay principal, interest, or call premium on any other issue of bonds after 90 days of the date of issue, including proceeds that will be used to fund an escrow account for this purpose. Part V—Description of Refunded Bonds Complete this part only if the bonds are to be used to refund a prior issue of tax-exempt bonds. For a lease or installment sale, write “N/A” in the space to the right of the title for Part V. Lines 31 and 32. The remaining weighted average maturity is determined without regard to the refunding. The weighted average maturity is determined in the same manner as on line 21, column (d). Line 34. If more than a single issue of bonds will be refunded, enter the date of issue of each issue. Enter the date in an MM/DD/YYYY format. Part VI—Miscellaneous Line 35. An allocation of volume cap is required if the nonqualified amount for the issue is more than $15 million but is not more than the amount that would cause the issue to be private activity bonds. Line 36. If any portion of the gross proceeds of the issue is or will be invested in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC), as defined in Regulations section 1.148-1(b), enter the amount of the gross proceeds so invested, as well as the final maturity date of the GIC and the name of the provider of such contract. Line 37. If the issue is a pooled financing issue (as defined under Pooled financing issue in Definitions), enter the amount of the proceeds used to make loans to other governmental units, the interest on which is tax-exempt. Line 38. If the issue is a loan of proceeds from a pooled financing issue (as defined under Pooled financing issue in Definitions), check the box and where asked for the date of issue, EIN, and name of the issuer of the master pool obligation, enter the date of issue, EIN, and name of the issuer of the pooled financing issue. Line 40. Check this box if the issue is a construction issue and an irrevocable election to pay a penalty in lieu of arbitrage rebate has been made on or before the date the bonds were issued. The penalty is payable with a Form 8038-T for each 6-month period after the date the bonds are issued. Do not make any payment of penalty in lieu of arbitrage rebate with this form. See Rev. Proc. 92-22, 1992-1 C.B. 736 for rules regarding the “election document.” Line 41a. Check this box if the issuer has identified a hedge on its books and records according to Regulations sections 1.148-4(h)(2)(viii) and 1.148-4(h)(5) that permit an issuer of tax-exempt bonds to identify a hedge for it to be included in yield calculations for computing arbitrage. Line 42. In determining if the issuer has super-integrated a hedge, apply the rules of Regulations section 1.148-4(h)(4). If the hedge is super-integrated, check the box. Line 43. If the issuer takes a “deliberate action” after the issue date that causes the conditions of the private business tests or the private loan financing test to be met, then such issue is also an issue of private activity bonds. Regulations section 1.141-2(d)(3) defines a deliberate action as any action taken by the issuer that is within its control regardless of whether there is intent to violate such tests. Regulations section 1.141-12 explains the conditions to taking remedial action that prevent an action that causes an issue to meet the private business tests or private loan financing test from being treated as a deliberate action. Check the box if the issuer has established written procedures to ensure timely remedial action for all nonqualified bonds according to -3-114 Page 4 of 4 Fileid: Instructions/I8038G/201209/A/XML/Cycle04/source 14:33 - 10-Aug-2012The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Regulations section 1.141-12 or other remedial actions authorized by the Commissioner under Regulations section 1.141-12(h). Line 44. Check the box if the issuer has established written procedures to monitor compliance with the arbitrage, yield restriction, and rebate requirements of section 148. Line 45a. Check the box if some part of the proceeds was used to reimburse expenditures. Figure and then enter the amount of proceeds that are used to reimburse the issuer for amounts paid for a qualified purpose prior to the issuance of the bonds. See Regulations section 1.150-2. Line 45b. An issuer must adopt an official intent to reimburse itself for preissuance expenditures within 60 days after payment of the original expenditure unless excepted by Regulations section 1.150-2(f). Enter the date the official intent was adopted. See Regulations section 1.150-2(e) for more information about official intent. Signature and Consent An authorized representative of the issuer must sign Form 8038-G and any applicable certification. Also print the name and title of the person signing Form 8038-G. The authorized representative of the issuer signing this form must have the authority to consent to the disclosure of the issuer's return information, as necessary to process this return, to the person(s) that have been designated in Form 8038-G. Note. If the issuer in Part 1, lines 3a and 3b authorizes the IRS to communicate (including in writing and by telephone) with a person other than an officer or other employee of the issuer, by signing this form, the issuer's authorized representative consents to the disclosure of the issuer's return information, as necessary to process this return, to such person. Paid Preparer If an authorized officer of the issuer filled in this return, the paid preparer's space should remain blank. Anyone who prepares the return but does not charge the organization should not sign the return. Certain others who prepare the return should not sign. For example, a regular, full-time employee of the issuer, such as a clerk, secretary, etc., should not sign. Generally, anyone who is paid to prepare a return must sign it and fill in the other blanks in the Paid Preparer Use Only area of the return. The paid preparer must:Sign the return in the space provided for the preparer's signature (a facsimile signature is acceptable),Enter the preparer information, andGive a copy of the return to the issuer. Paperwork Reduction Act Notice. We ask for the information on this form to carry out the Internal Revenue laws of the United States. You are required to give us the information. We need it to ensure that you are complying with these laws. You are not required to provide the information requested on a form that is subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act unless the form displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a form or its instructions must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any Internal Revenue law. Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential, as required by section 6103. The time needed to complete and file this form varies depending on individual circumstances. The estimated average time is: Learning about the law or the form ........... 2 hr., 41 min. Preparing, copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS .... 3 hr., 3 min. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of these time estimates or suggestions for making this form simpler, we would be happy to hear from you. You can write to the Internal Revenue Service, Tax Products Coordinating Committee, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:M:S, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, IR-6526, Washington, DC 20224. Do not send the form to this office. Instead, see Where To File. -4-115 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Jessica Ahlstrom, Water Conservation Program Manager Alex Nordquest, City Forester John Alston, Director of Utilities SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement with Green Gardens Group LLC for a Bozeman Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement with Green Gardens Group LLC for a Bozeman Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series STRATEGIC PLAN:6.1 Clean Water Supplies: Ensure adequate supplies of clean water for today and tomorrow. BACKGROUND:The core objective of the City’s water conservation program is to educate and empower residents to use water efficiently. In 2021 and 2022, the City hired the Environmental Protection Agency’s WaterSense® accredited Green Gardens Group to host their Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series for Bozeman residents to provide them with the knowledge to increase outdoor water use efficiency through landscape and irrigation changes. Dozens of community members signed up for the Webinar Series each year and overwhelmingly provided positive feedback about the content. With fifty percent of summer water use going into lawns and landscapes, expanding efficient outdoor water use practices in the community is central to reducing overall water demand and extending the reach of the City’s current reliable water supply. The City would like to offer the Green Gardens Group Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series to customers in 2023. The Webinar Series provides comprehensive guidance to water customers regarding landscaping basics, turf removal and organic maintenance, drip irrigation, composting and soil health, tree care, and drought tolerant landscape design through an interactive online program. Throughout the webinars, attendees are invited to submit their questions in the online Q/A chat box. Live responses to questions will be provided by professional landscape designers and various polls create an interactive environment and an opportunity to engage the audience. In a collaborative effort, the Forestry Division of our Parks & Recreation 116 Department will fund the tree care webinar portion. The Forestry Division shares the goal of public education pertaining to landscapes and efficient watering for the benefit of healthier trees. The webinar would also align with the City’s Urban Forest Management Plan, which recommends increased community engagement to support a holistic, sustainable urban forestry program. Taught by experienced landscape designers through a series of six interactive online courses, these topics will provide water customers with the information needed to transform their landscape to improve water quality and reduce water use. All course content is customized for the City of Bozeman and would be offered to customers throughout the months of April/May 2023. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:Total costs for this project equal $9,700.00. A total of $7,950.00 will be paid for out of the Water Conservation Division professional services fund and $1,750.00 will be paid for out of the Forestry Division professional services fund. Attachments: Professional Services Agreement_G3_Water Wise Landscape Webinar Series 2023 FINAL.pdf Attachment A_G3_Scope of Services 2023 FINALdocx.pdf Report compiled on: February 9, 2023 117 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 1 of 10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and, G3LA, LLC dba Green Gardens Group, 149 S. Barrington Ave. #758, Los Angeles, CA 90049, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” The City and Contractor may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose: City agrees to enter this Agreement with Contractor to perform for City services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. Term/Effective Date: This Agreement is effective upon the Effective Date and will expire on the 5th day of March, 2024, unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement. 3. Scope of Services: Contractor will perform the work and provide the services in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services. For conflicts between this Agreement and the Scope of Services, unless specifically provided otherwise, the Agreement governs. 4. Payment: City agrees to pay Contractor the amount specified in the Scope of Services. Any alteration or deviation from the described services that involves additional costs above the Agreement amount will be performed by Contractor after written request by the City, and will become an additional charge over and above the amount listed in the Scope of Services. The City must agree in writing upon any additional charges. 5. Contractor’s Representations: To induce City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor makes the following representations: a. Contractor has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of this Agreement, the Scope of Services, and with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, 118 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 2 of 10 and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress or performance of the Scope of Services. b. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has the experience and ability to perform the services required by this Agreement; that it will perform the services in a professional, competent and timely manner and with diligence and skill; that it has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement and grant the rights granted in it; and that its performance of this Agreement shall not infringe upon or violate the rights of any third party, whether rights of copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, libel, slander or any other rights of any nature whatsoever, or violate any federal, state and municipal laws. The City will not determine or exercise control as to general procedures or formats necessary to have these services meet this warranty. 6. Independent Contractor Status/Labor Relations: The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this Agreement and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies handbook and may not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 39, Chapter 71, Montana Code Annotated (MCA), and the Occupational Disease Act of Montana, Title 39, Chapter 71, MCA. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all members and employees of Contractor’s business, except for those members who are exempted by law. Contractor shall furnish the City with copies showing one of the following: (1) a binder for workers’ compensation coverage by an insurer licensed and authorized to provide workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Montana; or (2) proof of exemption from workers’ compensation granted by law for independent contractors. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement, any labor problems or disputes of any type arise or materialize which in turn cause any services to cease for any period of time, Contractor specifically agrees to take immediate steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. Contractor shall provide immediate relief to the City so as to permit the services to continue at no additional cost to City. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and liabilities arising out of, resulting from, or occurring in 119 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 3 of 10 connection with any labor problems or disputes or any delays or stoppages of work associated with such problems or disputes. 7. Indemnity/Waiver of Claims/Insurance: For other than professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and officers (collectively referred to for purposes of this Section as the City) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, fees and costs (including attorney’s fees and the costs and fees of expert witness and consultants), losses, expenses, liabilities (including liability where activity is inherently or intrinsically dangerous) or damages of whatever kind or nature connected therewith and without limit and without regard to the cause or causes thereof or the negligence of any party or parties that may be asserted against, recovered from or suffered by the City occasioned by, growing or arising out of or resulting from or in any way related to: (i) the negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of the Contractor; or (ii) any negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of any of the Contractor’s agents. For the professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless against claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses, including reasonable defense attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Contractor or Contractor’s agents or employees. Such obligations shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist. The indemnification obligations of this Section must not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any common-law or statutory rights of the City as indemnitee(s) which would otherwise exist as to such indemnitee(s). Contractor’s indemnity under this Section shall be without regard to and without any right to contribution from any insurance maintained by City. Should the City be required to bring an action against the Contractor to assert its right to defense or indemnification under this Agreement or under the Contractor’s applicable insurance policies required below, the City shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in asserting its right to indemnification or defense but only if a court of competent jurisdiction determines the Contractor was obligated to defend the claim(s) or was obligated to indemnify the City for a claim(s) or any portion(s) thereof. In the event of an action filed against the City resulting from the City’s performance under this Agreement, the City may elect to represent itself and incur all costs and expenses of suit. Contractor also waives any and all claims and recourse against the City, including the right of 120 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 4 of 10 contribution for loss or damage to person or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to the performance of this Agreement except “responsibility for [City’s] own fraud, for willful injury to the person or property of another, or for violation of law, whether willful or negligent” as per 28-2-702, MCA. These obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement and the services performed hereunder. In addition to and independent from the above, Contractor shall at Contractor’s expense secure insurance coverage through an insurance company or companies duly licensed and authorized to conduct insurance business in Montana which insures the liabilities and obligations specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance coverage shall not contain any exclusion for liabilities specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance shall cover and apply to all claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses that may be asserted or claimed against, recovered from, or suffered by the City without limit and without regard to the cause therefore and which is acceptable to the City. Contractor shall furnish to the City an accompanying certificate of insurance and accompanying endorsements in amounts not less than as follows: • Workers’ Compensation – statutory; • Employers’ Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; • Commercial General Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; • Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 property damage/bodily injury per accident; and • Professional Liability - $1,000,000 per claim; $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The above amounts shall be exclusive of defense costs. The City shall be endorsed as an additional or named insured on a primary non-contributory basis on the Commercial General, Employer’s Liability, and Automobile Liability policies. The insurance and required endorsements must be in a form suitable to City and shall include no less than a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Contractor shall notify City within two (2) business days of Contractor’s receipt of notice that any required insurance coverage will be terminated or Contractor’s decision to terminate any required insurance coverage for any reason. The City must approve all insurance coverage and endorsements prior to the Contractor commencing work. 121 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 5 of 10 8. Termination for Contractor’s Fault: a. If Contractor refuses or fails to timely do the work, or any part thereof, or fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, or otherwise breaches any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City may, by written notice, terminate this Agreement and the Contractor’s right to proceed with all or any part of the work (“Termination Notice Due to Contractor’s Fault”). The City may then take over the work and complete it, either with its own resources or by re-letting the contract to any other third party. b. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 8, Contractor shall be entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered. c. Any termination provided for by this Section 8 shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled under the law or at equity. d. In the event of termination under this Section 8, Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 9. Termination for City’s Convenience: a. Should conditions arise which, in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, make it advisable to the City to cease performance under this Agreement, the City may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Contractor (“Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience”). The termination shall be effective in the manner specified in the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience and shall be without prejudice to any claims that the City may otherwise have against Contractor. b. Upon receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, unless otherwise directed in the Notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease performance under this Agreement and make every reasonable effort to refrain from continuing work, incurring additional expenses or costs under this Agreement and shall immediately cancel all existing orders or contracts upon terms satisfactory to the City. Contractor shall do only such work as may be necessary to preserve, protect, and maintain work already completed or immediately in progress. c. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 9, Contractor is entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered on or before the receipt of the 122 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 6 of 10 Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience. d. The compensation described in Section 9(c) is the sole compensation due to Contractor for its performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 10. Limitation on Contractor’s Damages; Time for Asserting Claim: a. In the event of a claim for damages by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor’s damages shall be limited to contract damages and Contractor hereby expressly waives any right to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature or kind. b. In the event Contractor wants to assert a claim for damages of any kind or nature, Contractor shall provide City with written notice of its claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding and giving rise to the claim, and the total amount of damages sought by the claim, within thirty (30) days of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the claim. In the event Contractor fails to provide such notice, Contractor shall waive all rights to assert such claim. 11. Representatives and Notices: a. City’s Representative: The City’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Jessica Ahlstrom, Water Conservation Program Manager, or such other individual as City shall designate in writing. Whenever approval or authorization from or communication or submission to City is required by this Agreement, such communication or submission shall be directed to the City’s Representative and approvals or authorizations shall be issued only by such Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when City’s Representative is not available, Contractor may direct its communication or submission to other designated City personnel or agents as designated by the City in writing and may receive approvals or authorization from such persons. b. Contractor’s Representative: The Contractor’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Pamela Berstler, CEO G3LA, LLC dba G3, Green Gardens Group or such other individual as Contractor shall designate in writing. Whenever direction to or communication with Contractor is required by this Agreement, such direction or 123 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 7 of 10 communication shall be directed to Contractor’s Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when Contractor’s Representative is not available, City may direct its direction or communication to other designated Contractor personnel or agents. c. Notices: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided to the Representatives named in this Section. Notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered by courier to Party’s address shown above during normal business hours of the recipient; or when sent, if sent by email or fax (with a successful transmission report) to the email address or fax number provided by the Party’s Representative; or on the fifth business day following mailing, if mailed by ordinary mail to the address shown above, postage prepaid. 12. Permits: Contractor shall provide all notices, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, including a City of Bozeman business license, and inspections from applicable governmental authorities, and pay all fees and charges in connection therewith. 13 Laws and Regulations: Contractor shall comply fully with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and municipal ordinances including, but not limited to, all workers’ compensation laws, all environmental laws including, but not limited to, the generation and disposal of hazardous waste, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), the safety rules, codes, and provisions of the Montana Safety Act in Title 50, Chapter 71, MCA, all applicable City, County, and State building and electrical codes, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all non-discrimination, affirmative action, and utilization of minority and small business statutes and regulations. 14. Nondiscrimination and Equal Pay: The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). 124 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 8 of 10 Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 15. Intoxicants; DOT Drug and Alcohol Regulations/Safety and Training: Contractor shall not permit or suffer the introduction or use of any intoxicants, including alcohol or illegal drugs, by any employee or agent engaged in services to the City under this Agreement while on City property or in the performance of any activities under this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges it is aware of and shall comply with its responsibilities and obligations under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations governing anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention plans and related testing. City shall have the right to request proof of such compliance and Contractor shall be obligated to furnish such proof. The Contractor shall be responsible for instructing and training the Contractor's employees and agents in proper and specified work methods and procedures. The Contractor shall provide continuous inspection and supervision of the work performed. The Contractor is responsible for instructing its employees and agents in safe work practices. 16. Modification and Assignability: This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except by written agreement signed by both parties hereto. The Contractor may not subcontract or assign Contractor’s rights, including the right to compensation or duties arising hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Any subcontractor or assignee will be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 17. Reports/Accountability/Public Information: Contractor agrees to develop and/or provide documentation as requested by the City demonstrating Contractor’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Contractor shall allow the City, its auditors, and other persons authorized by the City to inspect and copy its books and records for the purpose of verifying that the reimbursement of monies distributed to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement was used in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. The Contractor shall not issue any statements, releases or information for public dissemination without prior approval of the City. 18. Non-Waiver: A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of any terms or conditions of this Agreement does not limit the other party’s right to enforce such term 125 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 9 of 10 or conditions or to pursue any available legal or equitable rights in the event of any subsequent default or breach. 19. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In the event it becomes necessary for either Party to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party or the Party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including the City Attorney’s Office staff. 20. Taxes: Contractor is obligated to pay all taxes of any kind or nature and make all appropriate employee withholdings. 21. Dispute Resolution: a. Any claim, controversy, or dispute between the parties, their agents, employees, or representatives shall be resolved first by negotiation between senior-level personnel from each party duly authorized to execute settlement agreements. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the parties may invite an independent, disinterested mediator to assist in the negotiated settlement discussions. b. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the dispute was first raised, then such dispute may only be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in compliance with the Applicable Law provisions of this Agreement. 22. Survival: Contractor’s indemnification shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for the maximum period allowed under applicable law. 23. Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not be construed as a part of the Agreement or as a limitation on the scope of the particular paragraphs to which they refer. 24. Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the balance thereof shall continue in effect. 25. Applicable Law: The parties agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. 26. Binding Effect: This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. 126 Professional Services Agreement for Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series FY 2023 Page 10 of 10 27. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties, does not constitute a third-party beneficiary agreement, and may not be relied upon or enforced by a third party. 28. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together constitute one instrument. 29. Integration: This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement of the parties. Covenants or representations not contained herein or made a part thereof by reference, are not binding upon the parties. There are no understandings between the parties other than as set forth in this Agreement. All communications, either verbal or written, made prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby abrogated and withdrawn unless specifically made a part of this Agreement by reference. 30. Consent to Electronic Signatures: The Parties have consented to execute this Agreement electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written or as recorded in an electronic signature. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA G3LA, LLC dba Green Gardens Group By________________________________ By__________________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Pamela Berstler, CEO APPROVED AS TO FORM: By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 127 Attachment A: Scope of Services G3LA, LLC dba G3, Green Gardens Group Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series I. Introduction This document outlines the tasks to be completed by G3LA, LLC dba G3, Green Gardens Group, (hereinafter “Contractor”) for the Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series for the City of Bozeman, Department of Public Works (hereinafter “City”), 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, Montana 59715. II. Purpose The City requires an organization with the skills and expertise to host a watershed wise landscape webinar series to educate and inspire Bozeman residents to establish beautiful low water use landscapes and reduce outdoor water use. Bozeman residents have expressed interest in gaining a better understanding on how to transform high water use lawns into water-efficient landscapes. The intent of this project is to provide Bozeman residents with the knowledge to make water-saving landscape transformations from an accredited WaterSense® professional certifying organization. III. Scope of Services Contractor will provide an interactive online program consisting of six classes to educate, inspire and motivate homeowners to transform yards into watershed-wise landscapes. Throughout the webinars, attendees are invited to submit their questions in the online Q/A chat box. Live responses to questions will be provided by professional landscape designers and various polls create an interactive environment and an opportunity to engage the audience. Learning Objectives: • Evaluate a property as though it were a mini-watershed • Use soil food web principles to remove lawn without chemicals and build living soil • Size and site a rain capture area that holds onto first flush • Review irrigation methods and practices to maximize water use efficiency • Select and place plants on a property according to water needs and key design principles • Tips and techniques to compost building for a healthy soil sponge • Properly caring for trees Description of Classes: Each webinar within the series must have at least 5, but no more than 100 attendees. The webinar series is to be completed in April/May 2023 and the format for each webinar within the series is as follows: • Instructors welcome attendees • Discuss any relevant rebates or water conservation programs • Fifty (50) or Eighty (80) minutes of instruction 128 • Ten (10) minutes Q/A at the end • Follow up with links to resources and rebates as provided by City and Contractor During the webinars, attendees are invited to submit their questions in the Q/A section. The live responding to questions, as well as various polls, create an opportunity to engage the audience. This creates an interactive environment akin to the format we use during the live workshops. At the end of the workshop, polling is used to gather class evaluations, see what topics might be of additional interest, and let attendees know about upcoming classes. Each webinar included in the series is listed below: Watershed Wise Landscaping – 60 minute webinar that discusses key principles of a watershed wise landscape, the recommended model for any landscape transformation program and outlines the following information: • Building healthy living soil • Utilizing passive rainwater • Selecting local climate appropriate/native plants • Using high efficiency irrigation Turf: Remove, Replace, or Maintain It (Organically) – 60 minute webinar that discusses removing and managing turf using the following information: • Removing turf without the use of chemicals • Replacing turf with climate appropriate plantings • Keeping the turf in place but maintaining it in an organic manner o Building soil for healthy lawns o Properly irrigating a lawn o Simple lawn care strategies to improve resilience o Managing the big three: weeds, pests, and disease Drip Irrigation Fundamentals – 60 minute webinar that details the following steps to an efficient drip system: • Understanding the soil moisture balance • Key components of a properly installed drip system • Typical problems with drip and how to avoid them • Developing a successful maintenance practice Protecting the Trees- 60 minute webinar that highlights the importance of tree health, particularly during times of drought. Attendees learn about: • Understanding how trees collaborate in the landscape • Developing an irrigation strategy for efficiently watering trees • Creating separate irrigation systems for trees planted in grass areas • Developing a successful maintenance practice to ensure survival 129 Compost, Building the Soil Sponge – 60 minute webinar that drills down into the vital process of creating a healthy soil sponge: • Understanding how plants work with their soil • Introducing the soil food web • Techniques and tips for making compost • Sheet mulching to build healthy soil • Selecting other soil amendments for the garden Garden Design Workshop – 90 minute webinar that takes attendees through the step-by-step process of creating a successful watershed wise design and include the following information: • Raingarden design and placement • Selecting a plant palette • Role of native plants • Layout recommendations • Design considerations IV. Contractor Responsibilities Contractor shall: • Set up a secure calendar of classes and online registration database through Contractor’s website to manage and deliver the webinar program via Zoom online meeting platform; • Communicate with participants through email as needed before the webinar takes place, including registration confirmation and reminders; • Provide two G3 Qualified Instructors for each webinar; one instructor to lead the webinar and another instructor to be available throughout the webinar to answer questions submitted by attendees via the Q/A chat box, manage polls, and provide backend support during events; • Minimum class size is 5, maximum is 200; • Manage webinar program to deliver the classes (Zoom); • Set up secure on-line calendar and participant registration site; • Manage registration, confirmations, and communications with participants; • Ensure that the class curriculum is regionally appropriate within the Bozeman service area. All customized content shall be approved by City; • Provide City with registration and attendance detail; • Collect, tally and submit class evaluation forms; • Invoice in a timely manner. V. City Responsibilities City shall: 130 • Provide webinar advertising and marketing to the public; • Provide Contractor with access to relevant images and information to be used in customizing webinars for regional appropriateness; • Provide resources and information on relevant programs to be included in webinars; • Provide input and final approval of customized class content; • Attend each webinar; • Pay invoices for workshop preparation and instruction in a timely manner. VI. Cost and Timeline The six webinars included in the Watershed Wise Landscape Webinar Series are to be hosted one time each in April/May 2023. The total cost to host each of the six webinars once, plus a one-time customization fee for the Drip Irrigation Maintenance and Troubleshooting class, totals $9,700.00. Cost: $250 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,950.00 TOTAL: $9,700.00 One-time Customization Fee for the Protecting the Trees Class Watershed Wise Landscaping Class Turf: Remove, Replace or Maintain It (Organically) Class Drip Irrigation Fundamentals Class Protecting the Trees Class Compost, Building the Soil Sponge Class Garden Design Workshop Class If after the third presentation of a webinar topic of Contractor’s curriculum, City wishes to take over the instructions, each webinar can be licensed indefinitely for a one-time payment of $750.00 per presentation. The license includes both virtual and in-person rights to the presentations. The license is limited to the Bozeman, MT service area and Contractor will retain all intellectual property rights to the material. 131 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Gail Jorgenson, GIS Program Manager Jon Henderson, Strategic Services Director SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement for ESRI Professional Services to Provide Consulting Services for ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade Support MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement for ESRI Professional Services to Provide Consulting Services for ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade Support STRATEGIC PLAN:1.1 Outreach: Continue to strengthen and innovate in how we deliver information to the community and our partners. BACKGROUND:The Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Department at the city maintains a complex computer architecture that allows city employees and the public access to maps, data, applications and imagery products. This GIS architecture includes servers, software installs, security protocols and integrations with other software across multiple servers. ESRI Professional Services will assist the city's GIS/AM Department develop a sequence for and then assist in updates to identified servers, software and web connections keeping our GIS architecture current and secure allowing the city to provide award winning GIS services to the public and city workers. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As directed by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:The total quoted Scope of Services is $40,523. Activity 1 – ArcGIS Enterprise Migration cost not to exceed $8,280. Activity 2 – ArcGIS Enterprise Upgrade cost not to exceed $32,243. Both activities are funded through the 2023 FY Strategic Services/GIS Department operating budget. Attachments: Montana_Esri Purchasing Agreement.pdf Scope of Work_ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade Support.pdf 132 Task Order_ArcGIS EnterpriseMigrationandUpgradeSupport.pdf Report compiled on: February 10, 2023 133 Amendment No. 13 Agreement No. 2004MPA3427 00221730.12 Page 1 of 52 1/20/2023 LG This Amendment No. 13 is entered into by and between the State of Montana (“Licensee”) and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Esri”). WHEREAS, Esri and Licensee entered into a Master Purchase Agreement with an effective date of October 28, 2005 (hereinafter “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional period through March 31, 2023 and update pricing; NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following: 1.Pursuant to Article 2 Term of the Agreement of the E500. The term of this Agreement is hereby extended through March 31, 2023, unless terminated earlier as provided as provided in the Agreement. 2.Esri MPA Price List. The current Esri MPA Price List is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached State of Montana MPA Price List MPA-05-1Q2023. Except as may be specifically modified by this Amendment No. 13, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and any Amendment(s) or Addendum(s) constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersede all prior and contemporaneous agreements or representations, written or oral, concerning the subject matter of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 13 as of the date of the last party to sign below. STATE OF MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH (Licensee) INSTITUTE, INC. (Esri) Legal Address: 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100 By: ExternalSignature1 By: ExternalSignature1 Authorized Signature Authorized Signature Printed Name: ExternalName1 Printed Name: ExternalName1 Title: ExternalTitle1 Title: ExternalTitle1 Date: ExternalTitle1 Date: ExternalTitle1 STATE OF MONTANA (Licensee) By: ExternalSignature1 Authorized Signature Printed Name: ExternalName1 Title: ExternalTitle1 Date: ExternalTitle1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 Attorney Michele Snowberger 1/25/2023 Timothy Brazeal Manager, Commercial and Government Contracts 1/25/20231/26/2023 Kevin Gilbertson Chief Information Officer 125 N. Roberts St. Helena, MT 59601 134 Page 2 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information State of Montana MPA Price List MPA-05-1Q2023 Section Part Number Description 2022 Price 2023 Price ArcGIS Desktop and Extensions 1 ArcGIS Desktop - Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 52382 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Concurrent Use Perpetual License $10,346.00 $13,167.00 86353 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Concurrent Use Perpetual License $6,650.00 $7,315.00 87143 ArcGIS Desktop Basic Concurrent Use Perpetual License $3,325.00 $3,658.00 1 ArcGIS Desktop - Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 52384 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $3,000.00 $3,300.00 52385 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $1,200.00 $1,320.00 86497 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $1,500.00 $1,650.00 86500 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $1,200.00 $1,320.00 87194 ArcGIS Desktop Basic Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $700.00 $770.00 87195 ArcGIS Desktop Basic Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 1.1 ArcGIS Desktop Core Extensions - Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 88282 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 88283 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 88284 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 90321 ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 91605 ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 98133 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 99736 ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 100477 ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 111290 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 99047 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 159050 ArcGIS Image Analyst for Pro Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 165322 ArcGIS LocateXT for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 1.1 ArcGIS Desktop Core Extensions - Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 87198 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 87199 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 87232 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 87233 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 87236 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 87237 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 92774 ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 92775 ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 96880 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 135 Page 3 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 93984 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 98134 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 98135 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 98696 ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 98697 ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 100571 ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 100572 ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 100573 ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 100574 ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 118242 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 118243 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 162284 ArcGIS Image Analyst for Pro Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 162285 ArcGIS Image Analyst for Pro Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 165325 ArcGIS LocateXT for Desktop Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 165327 ArcGIS LocateXT for Desktop Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 1.2 ArcGIS Desktop - Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 122086 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Single Use Perpetual License $10,346.00 $13,124.00 93206 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use Perpetual License $6,650.00 $7,315.00 93198 ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use Perpetual License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 1.2 ArcGIS Desktop - Single Use - Maintenance Prices 87192 ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use Primary Maintenance $400.00 $440.00 87193 ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use Secondary Maintenance $300.00 $330.00 93094 ArcGIS Desktop Basic with Extensions Single Use Primary Maintenance $1,000.00 $1,100.00 93095 ArcGIS Desktop Basic with Extensions Single Use Secondary Maintenance $900.00 $990.00 93303 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use Primary Maintenance $1,500.00 $1,650.00 93304 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use Secondary Maintenance $1,200.00 $1,320.00 93306 ArcGIS Desktop Standard with Extensions Single Use Primary Maintenance $2,100.00 $2,310.00 93307 ArcGIS Desktop Standard with Extensions Single Use Secondary Maintenance $1,800.00 $1,980.00 122181 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Single Use Primary Maintenance $3,000.00 $3,300.00 122183 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Single Use Secondary Maintenance $1,200.00 $1,320.00 1.3 ArcGIS Desktop Core Extensions - Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 93168 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 93172 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 93176 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 93194 ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 93164 ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 98131 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 99734 ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 100475 ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 111560 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 99045 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 159049 ArcGIS Image Analyst for Pro Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 136 Page 4 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 165321 ArcGIS LocateXT for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 154283 ArcGIS Desktop Extensions Single Use Perpetual License $7,125.00 $7,838.00 1.3 ArcGIS Desktop Core Extensions - Single Use - Maintenance Prices 122184 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122185 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122187 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122188 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122189 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122190 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122191 ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122192 ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122195 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122196 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122197 ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122270 ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122275 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122276 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122277 ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122278 ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122279 ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122280 ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 122281 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 122282 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 162282 ArcGIS Image Analyst for Pro Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 162283 ArcGIS Image Analyst for Pro Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 165324 ArcGIS LocateXT for Desktop Single Use Primary Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 165326 ArcGIS LocateXT for Desktop Single Use Secondary Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 168630 ArcGIS Desktop Extensions Single Use Primary Maintenance $1,500.00 $1,650.00 168631 ArcGIS Desktop Extensions Single Use Secondary Maintenance $600.00 $660.00 1.4 ArcGIS Desktop - Single Use - Annual Subscription Prices 148104 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Single Use Annual Subscription $3,990.00 $4,370.00 148105 ArcGIS for Desktop Standard Single Use Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 148106 ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Single Use Annual Subscription $760.00 $831.00 1.4 ArcGIS Desktop Core Extensions - Single Use - Annual Subscription Prices 148097 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148098 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148100 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148112 ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148113 ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148114 ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148115 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148116 ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 137 Page 5 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 148117 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148118 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 159047 ArcGIS Image Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 165323 ArcGIS LocateXT for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $570.00 $618.00 148107 ArcGIS Desktop Extensions Single Use Annual Subscription $1,710.00 $1,853.00 1.5 ArcGIS Desktop Upgrades 1.5 ArcGIS Desktop Upgrades - Perpetual License Prices 122496 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use $5,225.00 $5,748.00 122497 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Concurrent Use $3,325.00 $3,658.00 102583 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Concurrent Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use $5,225.00 $5,748.00 122774 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced User Single Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use $8,778.00 $11,557.00 88925 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced User Concurrent Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use $8,778.00 $11,600.00 88927 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Concurrent Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Concurrent Use $3,325.00 $3,658.00 122775 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced User Single Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Concurrent Use $6,688.00 $9,467.00 88928 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced User Concurrent Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Concurrent Use $6,688.00 $9,510.00 88929 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced User Concurrent Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use or Concurrent Use $3,031.00 $5,852.00 122776 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced User Single Use Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use or Concurrent Use $3,031.00 $5,809.00 1.5 ArcGIS Desktop Upgrades - Annual Subscription Prices 166362 ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use Annual Subscription Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use Annual Subscription $2,090.00 $2,304.00 166363 Desktop Advanced Single Use Annual Subscription Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Basic Single Use Annual Subscription $3,230.00 $3,539.00 166364 ArcGIS Desktop Advanced Single Use Annual Subscription Upgrade from ArcGIS Desktop Standard Single Use Annual Subscription $1,140.00 $1,235.00 1.6 ArcGIS Roads and Highways - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 128890 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 128884 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 1.6 ArcGIS Roads and Highways - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Maintenance Prices 128916 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 133196 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for Desktop Single Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 1.6 ArcGIS Roads and Highways - Single Use - Annual Subscription License Price 139698 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,133.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 138 Page 6 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 1.7 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 162412 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 153359 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 1.7 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Maintenance Price 153373 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for Desktop Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 1.7 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing - Single Use - Annual Subscription Price 153360 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,133.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions - Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 121831 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 121835 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 133005 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 121833 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 121839 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 130214 ArcGIS Bathymetry for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions - Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 121832 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 121836 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 133006 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 121834 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 121840 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 130215 ArcGIS Bathymetry for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions - Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 121805 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 121871 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 133034 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 121873 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 121875 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 130923 ArcGIS Bathymetry for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions - Single Use - Maintenance Prices 121804 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 121810 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 133033 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 121872 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 121874 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 130922 ArcGIS Bathymetry for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions Bundles - Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 133017 ArcGIS Aviation Airports Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $9,975.00 $10,973.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 139 Page 7 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 168057 ArcGIS Aviation Charting Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $17,765.00 $19,542.00 130938 ArcGIS Maritime Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $15,390.00 $16,929.00 130941 ArcGIS Bathymetry Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Perpetual License $11,875.00 $13,063.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions Bundles - Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 133016 ArcGIS Aviation Airports Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $9,975.00 $10,973.00 154921 ArcGIS Aviation Charting Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $17,765.00 $19,542.00 158381 ArcGIS Maritime Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $15,390.00 $16,929.00 130940 ArcGIS Bathymetry Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Perpetual License $11,875.00 $13,063.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions Bundles - Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 133019 ArcGIS Aviation Airports Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $2,750.00 $3,025.00 168058 ArcGIS Aviation Charting Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $6,000.00 $6,600.00 130909 ArcGIS Maritime Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $5,500.00 $6,050.00 130943 ArcGIS Bathymetry Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Concurrent Use Maintenance $3,250.00 $3,575.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting Solutions Bundles - Single Use - Maintenance Prices 133018 ArcGIS Aviation Airports Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $2,750.00 $3,025.00 154880 ArcGIS Aviation Charting Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $6,000.00 $6,600.00 158382 ArcGIS Maritime Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $5,500.00 $6,050.00 130942 ArcGIS Bathymetry Bundle for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Maintenance $3,350.00 $3,575.00 1.8 Mapping and Charting - Single Use - Annual Subscription Prices 133032 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $1,900.00 $2,066.00 130885 ArcGIS Bathymetry for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $1,900.00 $2,066.00 128209 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,133.00 128251 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,133.00 128208 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,133.00 149856 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Desktop Single Use Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,133.00 1.9 ArcGIS Indoors - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 180344 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Concurrent Use Perpetual License #N/A $10,450.00 180342 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Single Use Perpetual License #N/A $10,450.00 1.9 ArcGIS Indoors - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Maintenance Prices 180345 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Concurrent Use Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 180343 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Single Use Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 1.9 ArcGIS Indoors - Single Use - Annual Subscription Prices 180341 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Single Use Annual Subscription #N/A $4,133.00 ArcGIS CityEngine 2022 Price 2023 Price 2 ArcGIS CityEngine - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Perpetual License Prices 127658 ArcGIS CityEngine Concurrent Use Perpetual License $3,800.00 $4,180.00 127672 ArcGIS CityEngine Single Use Perpetual License $3,800.00 $4,180.00 2 ArcGIS CityEngine - Concurrent Use and Single Use - Maintenance Prices 127626 ArcGIS CityEngine Concurrent Use Primary Maintenance $800.00 $880.00 127625 ArcGIS CityEngine Single Use Primary Maintenance $800.00 $880.00 127657 ArcGIS CityEngine Concurrent Use Secondary Maintenance $675.00 $740.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 140 Page 8 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 127627 ArcGIS CityEngine Single Use Secondary Maintenance $675.00 $740.00 2 ArcGIS CityEngine - Single Use - Annual Subscription Prices 153351 ArcGIS CityEngine Single Use Annual Subscription $1,900.00 $2,090.00 ArcGIS Enterprise 2022 Price 2023 Price 3 ArcGIS Enterprise - Perpetual License Prices 160458 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $38,000.00 $41,800.00 160463 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 3 ArcGIS Enterprise - Maintenance Prices 161326 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Maintenance $10,000.00 $11,000.00 161328 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 3 ArcGIS Enterprise - Annual Subscription Prices 160660 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $22,800.00 $24,985.00 160663 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 3 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes - Annual Subscription Prices 172190 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes Up to 64 vCPUs Annual Subscription #N/A $95,000.00 183683 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes Up to 64 Additional vCPUs Annual Subscription #N/A $71,250.00 ArcGIS Monitor 2022 Price 2023 Price 4 ArcGIS Monitor - Perpetual License Prices 162036 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 162038 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Additional Core Perpetual License $475.00 $523.00 4 ArcGIS Monitor - Maintenance Prices 162037 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 162039 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Additional Core Maintenance $125.00 $135.00 4 ArcGIS Monitor - Annual Subscription Prices 162040 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,180.00 162071 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Additional Core Annual Subscription $475.00 $523.00 ArcGIS GIS Server 2022 Price 2023 Price 5 ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160483 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $38,000.00 $41,800.00 160899 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 160513 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 160900 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 160489 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 160901 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 5 ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161343 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Maintenance $10,000.00 $11,000.00 161388 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161369 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 161389 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Cores Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161348 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Maintenance $3,000.00 $3,300.00 161399 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Cores Maintenance $750.00 $825.00 5 ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160705 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $22,800.00 $24,985.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 141 Page 9 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 160706 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $11,400.00 $12,540.00 160704 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $4,465.00 $4,893.00 160370 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160149 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160148 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core 30 Day License $1,116.00 $1,211.00 160723 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 160724 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160722 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $2,185.00 $2,399.00 160372 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160153 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core 90 Day License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160152 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core 30 Day License $546.00 $594.00 160713 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160715 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160711 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160060 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160052 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160050 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 ArcGIS GIS Server Extensions 2022 Price 2023 Price 6 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160506 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161019 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161364 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161405 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160764 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160765 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160763 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160385 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160159 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160158 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.1 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160491 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161078 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 142 Page 10 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 6.1 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161350 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161400 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.1 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160752 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160753 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160751 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160646 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160382 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160381 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.2 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160509 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161022 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.2 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161366 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161407 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.2 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160779 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160780 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160778 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160869 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160806 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160805 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.3 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 153473 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 153477 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.3 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 143 Page 11 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 153544 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 153548 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.3 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 153497 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 153496 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 153495 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 153500 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 153499 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 153498 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.4 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160514 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161047 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.4 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161370 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161409 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.4 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160729 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160730 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160728 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160373 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160155 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160154 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.5 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160484 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161112 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.5 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 144 Page 12 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 161344 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161397 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.5 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160743 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160744 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160742 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160643 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160376 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160375 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.6 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160495 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161108 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.6 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161354 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161402 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.6 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160749 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160750 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160748 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160645 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160380 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160379 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.7 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 160497 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161097 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.7 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161356 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 145 Page 13 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 161403 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.7 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 160785 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160786 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160784 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160648 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160388 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160387 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.8 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 172423 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 161083 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.8 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 161380 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161414 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.8 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 172451 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 172453 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 172452 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 160391 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160163 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160162 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.9 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 162293 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 162296 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.9 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 162295 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 146 Page 14 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 162298 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.9 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 162359 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 162357 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 162355 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 162360 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 162358 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 162356 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.10 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 167335 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $9,500.00 $10,450.00 167337 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 6.10 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 167400 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 167444 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 6.10 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 167412 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $5,700.00 $6,270.00 167423 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $2,850.00 $3,135.00 167422 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $1,140.00 $1,211.00 167416 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 167431 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 167430 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $285.00 $309.00 6.11 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 181758 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License #N/A $10,450.00 181767 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License #N/A $2,613.00 6.11 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance License Prices 181816 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 181818 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance #N/A $685.00 6.11 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 147 Page 15 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 181760 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription #N/A $6,270.00 181761 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License #N/A $3,135.00 181762 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License #N/A $1,211.00 181768 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription #N/A $1,568.00 181769 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License #N/A $784.00 181770 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License #N/A $309.00 6.12 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server - Perpetual License Prices 181698 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Perpetual License #N/A $10,450.00 181737 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Perpetual License #N/A $2,613.00 6.12 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server - Maintenance Prices 181808 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 181810 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Maintenance #N/A $685.00 6.12 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server - Subscription Prices 181700 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription #N/A $6,270.00 181731 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License #N/A $3,135.00 181732 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License #N/A $1,211.00 181738 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription #N/A $1,568.00 181739 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License #N/A $784.00 181740 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License #N/A $309.00 6.13 ArcGIS Enterprise Server Upgrades 6.13 ArcGIS Enterprise from ArcGIS Enterprise Upgrade - Perpetual License Prices 154627 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS Enterprise Standard $19,000.00 $20,900.00 6.13 ArcGIS Enterprise from ArcGIS GIS Server Upgrade - Perpetual License Prices 154783 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic $28,500.00 $31,350.00 154781 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic $9,500.00 $10,450.00 6.13 ArcGIS GIS Server from ArcGIS Server Upgrade - Perpetual License Prices 154825 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Standard $19,000.00 $20,900.00 154831 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Standard $4,750.00 $5,225.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 148 Page 16 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 154823 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic $28,500.00 $31,350.00 154829 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic $7,125.00 $7,838.00 154821 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic $9,500.00 $10,450.00 154827 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic $2,375.00 $2,613.00 ArcGIS Enterprise Optional Capability Servers 2022 Price 2023 Price 7 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server - Perpetual License Prices 160470 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 160031 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 160037 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 7 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server - Maintenance Prices 161334 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 161392 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161419 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 7 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server - Subscription Prices 160669 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 160670 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160668 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $2,185.00 $2,399.00 160539 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160169 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 90 Day License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160168 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 30 Day License $546.00 $594.00 160653 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160537 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160536 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 30 Day License $274.00 $309.00 7.1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server - Perpetual License Prices 160474 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 161089 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 160054 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 7.1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server - Maintenance Prices 161337 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 161387 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161420 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 7.1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server - Subscription Prices 160678 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 160679 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $5,700.00 $6,270.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 149 Page 17 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 160677 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $2,185.00 $2,399.00 160801 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160802 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 90 Day License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160800 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 30 Day License $546.00 $594.00 160866 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160867 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160865 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 30 Day License $274.00 $309.00 7.2 ArcGIS Image Server - Perpetual License Prices 160478 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 161055 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 160033 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 7.2 ArcGIS Image Server - Maintenance Prices 161339 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 161393 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161421 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 7.2 ArcGIS Image Server - Subscription Prices 160684 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 160685 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $5,700.00 $6,270.00 160683 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $2,185.00 $2,399.00 160058 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 160048 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 90 Day License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160047 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 30 Day License $546.00 $594.00 160651 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 160533 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 160532 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 30 Day License $274.00 $309.00 7.3 ArcGIS Notebook Server - Perpetual License Prices 168103 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 168104 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 168105 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 7.3 ArcGIS Notebook Server - Maintenance Prices 168115 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 168116 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 168117 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 7.3 ArcGIS Notebook Server - Subscription Prices 168106 ArcGIS Notebook Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 168112 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $5,700.00 $6,270.00 168109 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $2,185.00 $2,399.00 168107 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 150 Page 18 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 168113 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 90 Day License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 168110 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 30 Day License $546.00 $594.00 168108 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 168114 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 168111 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 30 Day License $274.00 $309.00 7.4 ArcGIS Mission Server - Perpetual License Prices 172484 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 172485 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 172486 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 7.4 ArcGIS Mission Server - Maintenance Prices 172538 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 172539 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 172540 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 7.4 ArcGIS Mission Server - Subscription Prices 172487 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 172523 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $5,700.00 $6,270.00 172490 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $2,185.00 $2,399.00 172488 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 172524 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 90 Day License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 172521 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 30 Day License $546.00 $594.00 172489 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 172525 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 172522 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 30 Day License $274.00 $309.00 7.5 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server - Perpetual License Prices 177524 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License $19,000.00 $20,900.00 177527 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Perpetual License $4,750.00 $5,225.00 177526 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Perpetual License $2,375.00 $2,613.00 7.5 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server - Maintenance Prices 177584 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 177587 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 177586 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 7.5 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server - Subscription Prices 177558 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $12,540.00 177560 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $5,700.00 $6,270.00 177551 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $2,185.00 $2,399.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 151 Page 19 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 177563 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Annual Subscription $2,850.00 $3,135.00 177565 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 90 Day License $1,425.00 $1,568.00 177554 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 30 Day License $546.00 $594.00 177562 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Annual Subscription $1,425.00 $1,568.00 177564 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 90 Day License $713.00 $784.00 177553 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 30 Day License $274.00 $309.00 7.6 ArcGIS Knowledge Server - Perpetual License Prices 180566 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Perpetual License #N/A $20,900.00 181717 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Perpetual License #N/A $5,225.00 181830 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Perpetual License #N/A $2,613.00 7.6 ArcGIS Knowledge Server - Maintenance Prices 180567 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Maintenance #N/A $5,500.00 181796 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Maintenance #N/A $1,375.00 181831 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Maintenance #N/A $685.00 7.6 ArcGIS Knowledge Server - Subscription Prices 180564 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription #N/A $12,540.00 181836 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores 90 Day License #N/A $6,270.00 181833 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores 30 Day License #N/A $2,399.00 181718 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Annual Subscription #N/A $3,135.00 181837 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 90 Day License #N/A $1,568.00 181834 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) 30 Day License #N/A $594.00 181832 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Annual Subscription #N/A $1,568.00 181838 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 90 Day License #N/A $784.00 181835 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) 30 Day License #N/A $309.00 ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Servers 2022 Price 2023 Price 8 ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160588 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $19,539.00 $21,493.00 160590 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 8 ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161429 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 161430 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 8 ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160930 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $11,724.00 $12,896.00 160932 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 152 Page 20 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 8 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes - Annual Subscription Prices 172182 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes Up to 64 vCPU Staging Server Annual Subscription #N/A $48,847.00 183684 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes Up to 64 Additional vCPUs Staging Server Annual Subscription #N/A $36,635.00 8.1 ArcGIS Monitor Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 162072 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 162074 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $245.00 $269.00 8.1 ArcGIS Monitor Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 162073 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 162075 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $63.00 $69.00 8.1 ArcGIS Monitor Staging Server - Subscription Prices 162076 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,954.00 $2,150.00 162077 ArcGIS Monitor for ArcGIS Server Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $245.00 $269.00 ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Servers 2022 Price 2023 Price 9 ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160600 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $19,539.00 $21,493.00 160904 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 160615 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 161014 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $2,443.00 $2,687.00 160604 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161032 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 9 ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161436 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $5,000.00 $5,500.00 161455 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161448 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161456 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Cores Staging Server Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 161439 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,500.00 $1,650.00 161461 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Cores Staging Server Maintenance $375.00 $400.00 9 ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160943 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $11,724.00 $12,896.00 160944 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $5,862.00 $6,448.00 160942 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $2,296.00 $2,516.00 160955 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 160956 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160954 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $1,124.00 $1,222.00 160948 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160950 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160946 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160816 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160556 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 153 Page 21 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 160555 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $574.00 $611.00 160820 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160564 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $733.00 $806.00 160563 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $281.00 $294.00 160818 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160560 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160558 ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 ArcGIS GIS Server Extensions Staging Servers 2022 Price 2023 Price 10 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160608 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161023 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161443 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161473 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 161120 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 161121 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 161119 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160827 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160570 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160569 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.1 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160606 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161080 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.1 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161441 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161463 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.1 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160985 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 154 Page 22 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 160986 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160984 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160882 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160824 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160823 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.2 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160611 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161026 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.2 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161445 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161465 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.2 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 161000 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 161001 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160999 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160885 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160832 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160831 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.3 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 153560 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 153562 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.3 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 153550 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 155 Page 23 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 153592 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.3 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 153571 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 153570 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 153569 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 153574 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 153573 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 153572 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.4 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160616 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161049 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.4 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161449 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161466 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.4 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 161009 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 161010 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 161008 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160807 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160546 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160545 ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.5 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 156 Page 24 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 160601 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161114 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.5 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161437 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161469 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.5 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160991 ArcGIS for Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160992 ArcGIS for Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160990 ArcGIS for Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160066 ArcGIS for Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160067 ArcGIS for Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160065 ArcGIS for Maritime for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.6 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160605 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161109 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.6 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161440 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161462 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.6 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160958 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160959 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160957 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160540 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160171 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160170 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.7 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 157 Page 25 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 160612 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161099 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.7 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161446 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161475 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.7 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160979 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160980 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160978 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160543 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160177 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160176 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.8 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 172461 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 161085 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.8 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161452 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 161471 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.8 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 172465 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 172467 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 158 Page 26 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 172466 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 160833 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160574 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160573 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.9 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 162557 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 162520 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.9 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 162602 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 162632 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.9 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 162644 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 162642 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 162640 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 162645 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 162643 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 162641 ArcGIS Utility Network Management for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.11 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 167434 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $4,885.00 $5,374.00 167436 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 10.11 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 167460 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 167462 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 10.11 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 159 Page 27 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 167438 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $2,931.00 $3,224.00 167453 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License $1,466.00 $1,612.00 167452 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License $587.00 $645.00 167440 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 167457 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 167456 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Standard or Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License $147.00 $162.00 10.12 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 181776 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License #N/A $5,374.00 181780 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License #N/A $1,344.00 10.12 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 181822 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance #N/A $1,375.00 181823 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance #N/A $325.00 10.12 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 181777 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription #N/A $3,224.00 181778 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License #N/A $1,612.00 181779 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License #N/A $645.00 181781 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription #N/A $806.00 181782 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License #N/A $391.00 181783 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License #N/A $162.00 10.13 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 181747 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License #N/A $5,374.00 181751 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Perpetual License #N/A $1,344.00 10.13 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 181814 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance #N/A $1,375.00 181815 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Staging Server Maintenance #N/A $325.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 160 Page 28 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 10.13 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 181748 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription #N/A $3,224.00 181749 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 90 Day License #N/A $1,612.00 181750 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Up to Four Cores 30 Day License #N/A $645.00 181752 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core Annual Subscription #N/A $806.00 181753 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 90 Day License #N/A $391.00 181754 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS GIS Staging Server Advanced (Windows Only) Additional Core 30 Day License #N/A $162.00 10.14 ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Server Upgrades 10.14 ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Server from ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Server Upgrade - Perpetual License Prices 154629 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Staging Server Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Staging Server $9,770.00 $10,747.00 10.14 ArcGIS Enterprise Staging Server from ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server Upgrade - Perpetual License Prices 154787 ArcGIS Enterprise Advanced Staging Server Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Staging Server $14,654.00 $16,120.00 154785 ArcGIS Enterprise Standard Staging Server Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Staging Server $4,885.00 $5,374.00 10.14 ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server from ArcGIS GIS Server Staging Server Upgrade - Perpetual License Prices 154849 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Staging Server Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Staging Server $9,770.00 $10,747.00 154855 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Staging Server Additional Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Staging Server $2,443.00 $2,687.00 154847 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Staging Server Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Staging Server $14,655.00 $16,120.00 154853 ArcGIS GIS Server Advanced Staging Server Additional Core Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Staging Server $3,664.00 $4,030.00 154845 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Staging Server Up to Four Cores Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Staging Server $4,885.00 $5,374.00 154851 ArcGIS GIS Server Standard Staging Server Additional Core Upgrade from ArcGIS GIS Server Basic Staging Server $1,222.00 $1,344.00 ArcGIS Enterprise Optional Capability Servers Staging Servers 2022 Price 2023 Price 11 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160594 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 160039 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $2,443.00 $2,687.00 160143 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 11 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161433 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 161 Page 29 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 161459 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 161477 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 11 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160964 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 160965 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160963 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $1,124.00 $1,222.00 160822 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160568 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 90 Day License $733.00 $806.00 160567 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 30 Day License $281.00 $294.00 160887 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160873 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160872 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 30 Day License $140.00 $162.00 11.1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160596 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 161091 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $2,443.00 $2,687.00 160642 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 11.1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161434 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161454 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 161478 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 11.1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160967 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 160971 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160970 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $1,124.00 $1,222.00 160877 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160881 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 90 Day License $733.00 $806.00 160880 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 30 Day License $281.00 $294.00 160892 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160893 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160891 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 30 Day License $140.00 $162.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 162 Page 30 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 11.2 ArcGIS Image Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 160598 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 161057 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $2,443.00 $2,687.00 160044 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 11.2 ArcGIS Image Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 161435 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 161460 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 161479 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 11.2 ArcGIS Image Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 160937 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 160938 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $2,931.00 $3,224.00 160936 ArcGIS Image Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $1,124.00 $1,222.00 160814 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,466.00 $1,612.00 160552 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 90 Day License $733.00 $806.00 160551 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 30 Day License $281.00 $294.00 160875 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 160812 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 160811 ArcGIS Image Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 30 Day License $140.00 $162.00 11.3 ArcGIS Notebook Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 168135 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 168136 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $2,443.00 $2,687.00 168137 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 11.3 ArcGIS Notebook Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 168147 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 168148 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 168149 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 11.3 ArcGIS Notebook Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 168144 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 168141 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $2,931.00 $3,224.00 168138 ArcGIS Notebook Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $1,124.00 $1,222.00 168145 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,466.00 $1,612.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 163 Page 31 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 168142 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 90 Day License $733.00 $806.00 168139 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 30 Day License $281.00 $294.00 168146 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 168143 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 168140 ArcGIS Notebook Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 30 Day License $140.00 $162.00 11.4 ArcGIS Mission Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 172558 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 172559 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $2,443.00 $2,687.00 172560 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 11.4 ArcGIS Mission Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 172570 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 172571 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 172572 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 11.4 ArcGIS Mission Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 172567 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 172564 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $2,931.00 $3,224.00 172561 ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $1,124.00 $1,222.00 172568 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,466.00 $1,612.00 172565 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 90 Day License $733.00 $806.00 172562 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 30 Day License $281.00 $294.00 172569 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 172566 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 172563 ArcGIS Mission Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 30 Day License $140.00 $162.00 11.5 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Staging Server - Perpetual Prices 177528 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License $9,770.00 $10,747.00 177530 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $2,443.00 $2,687.00 177529 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (more than 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License $1,222.00 $1,344.00 11.5 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 177588 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 164 Page 32 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 177590 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Maintenance $625.00 $685.00 177589 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Maintenance $313.00 $325.00 11.5 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 177566 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription $5,862.00 $6,448.00 177567 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License $2,931.00 $3,224.00 177555 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License $1,124.00 $1,222.00 177569 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $1,466.00 $1,612.00 177571 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 90 Day License $733.00 $806.00 177557 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 30 Day License $281.00 $294.00 177568 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Annual Subscription $733.00 $806.00 177570 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 90 Day License $367.00 $391.00 177556 ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server Advanced Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 30 Day License $140.00 $162.00 11.6 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Staging Server - Perpetual License Prices 182423 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Perpetual License #N/A $10,747.00 182467 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Perpetual License #N/A $2,687.00 182468 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Perpetual License #N/A $1,344.00 11.6 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Staging Server - Maintenance Prices 182469 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 182470 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Maintenance #N/A $685.00 182471 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Maintenance #N/A $325.00 11.6 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Staging Server - Subscription Prices 182472 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription #N/A $6,448.00 182478 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 90 Day License #N/A $3,224.00 182475 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server 30 Day License #N/A $1,222.00 182473 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server Annual Subscription #N/A $1,612.00 182479 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 90 Day License #N/A $806.00 182476 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (up to 32 per server) Staging Server 30 Day License #N/A $294.00 182474 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server Annual Subscription #N/A $806.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 165 Page 33 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 182480 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 90 Day License #N/A $391.00 182477 ArcGIS Knowledge Server Additional Core (more than 32 per Server) Staging Server 30 Day License #N/A $162.00 ArcGIS Enterprise User Types, User Type Extensions, and Apps 2022 Price 2023 Price 12 ArcGIS Enterprise User Types - Perpetual License Prices 154251 ArcGIS Enterprise Creator Perpetual License $2,000.00 $2,200.00 166966 ArcGIS Enterprise Editor Perpetual License $800.00 $875.00 166967 ArcGIS Enterprise Mobile Worker Perpetual License $1,400.00 $1,525.00 166968 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Basic Perpetual License $2,800.00 $3,075.00 166969 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Standard Perpetual License $7,000.00 $7,700.00 166970 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Advanced Basic Perpetual License $9,900.00 $10,850.00 12 ArcGIS Enterprise User Types - Maintenance Prices 154097 ArcGIS Enterprise Creator Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167257 ArcGIS Enterprise Editor Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 167258 ArcGIS Enterprise Mobile Worker Maintenance $350.00 $385.00 167259 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Basic Maintenance $700.00 $750.00 167260 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Standard Maintenance $2,750.00 $2,750.00 167261 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Advanced Basic Maintenance $3,800.00 $3,800.00 12 ArcGIS Enterprise User Types - Annual Subscription Prices 154252 ArcGIS Enterprise Creator Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 166893 ArcGIS Enterprise Editor Annual Subscription $200.00 $220.00 166894 ArcGIS Enterprise Mobile Worker Annual Subscription $350.00 $385.00 166895 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Basic Annual Subscription $700.00 $765.00 166896 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Standard Annual Subscription $2,750.00 $3,025.00 166897 ArcGIS Enterprise GIS Professional Advanced Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,150.00 12 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes User Types - Annual Subscription Prices 183686 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes Viewer Annual Subscription #N/A $110.00 183687 ArcGIS Enterprise on Kubernetes Creator Annual Subscription #N/A $550.00 12.1 ArcGIS Enterprise User Type Extensions - Perpetual License Prices 173300 ArcGIS Utility Network User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $1,000.00 $1,100.00 173294 ArcGIS Parcel Fabric User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $1,000.00 $1,100.00 174947 ArcGIS Workflow Manager User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $1,000.00 $1,000.00 165650 ArcGIS Trace Network User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $1,000.00 $1,100.00 182315 ArcGIS Location Sharing User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License #N/A $330.00 12.1 ArcGIS Enterprise User Type Extensions - Maintenance Prices 173311 ArcGIS Utility Network User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 173295 ArcGIS Parcel Fabric User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 174948 ArcGIS Workflow Manager User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $200.00 $200.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 166 Page 34 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 165651 ArcGIS Trace Network User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise License Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 182316 ArcGIS Location Sharing User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise License Maintenance #N/A $65.00 12.1 ArcGIS Enterprise User Type Extensions - Annual Subscription Prices 173298 ArcGIS Utility Network User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $200.00 $220.00 173292 ArcGIS Parcel Fabric User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $200.00 $220.00 174945 ArcGIS Workflow Manager User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $200.00 $200.00 165649 ArcGIS Trace Network User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $200.00 $220.00 182311 ArcGIS Location Sharing User Type Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $65.00 12.2 ArcGIS Enterprise Apps - Perpetual License Prices 166981 ArcGIS Pro Basic for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $1,500.00 $1,650.00 166982 ArcGIS Pro Standard for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $7,000.00 $7,700.00 166983 ArcGIS Pro Advanced for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $9,990.00 $10,875.00 167943 ArcGIS Excalibur for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $2,000.00 $2,200.00 166980 ArcGIS Collector for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $240.00 $260.00 182313 ArcGIS Field Maps for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License #N/A $260.00 154296 ArcGIS GeoPlanner for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $2,000.00 $2,200.00 153391 ArcGIS Insights in ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $2,000.00 $2,200.00 173138 ArcGIS Mission Manager for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $2,000.00 $2,200.00 154292 ArcGIS Navigator for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $240.00 $260.00 166979 ArcGIS Survey123 for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $240.00 $260.00 169050 ArcGIS QuickCapture for Enterprise Perpetual License $240.00 $260.00 166978 ArcGIS Workforce for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $240.00 $260.00 12.2 ArcGIS Enterprise Apps - Maintenance Prices 167272 ArcGIS Pro Basic for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167273 ArcGIS Pro Standard for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $2,550.00 $2,800.00 167274 ArcGIS Pro Advanced for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $3,600.00 $3,950.00 167947 ArcGIS Excalibur for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167271 ArcGIS Collector for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $60.00 $65.00 182314 ArcGIS Field Maps for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance #N/A $65.00 153470 ArcGIS GeoPlanner for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 154300 ArcGIS Insights in ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 173139 ArcGIS Mission Manager for ArcGIS Enterprise Manager Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 154866 ArcGIS Navigator for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $60.00 $65.00 167270 ArcGIS Survey123 for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $60.00 $65.00 169051 ArcGIS QuickCapture for Enterprise Maintenance $60.00 $65.00 167269 ArcGIS Workforce for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $60.00 $65.00 12.2 ArcGIS Enterprise Apps - Annual Subscription Prices 166933 ArcGIS Pro Basic for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 167 Page 35 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 166934 ArcGIS Pro Standard for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $2,550.00 $2,800.00 166935 ArcGIS Pro Advanced for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $3,600.00 $3,950.00 167929 ArcGIS Excalibur for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 166932 ArcGIS Collector for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 182289 ArcGIS Field Maps for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $65.00 180428 ArcGIS Drone2Map Standard for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $1,750.00 180429 ArcGIS Drone2Map Advanced for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $3,500.00 154297 ArcGIS GeoPlanner for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 154332 ArcGIS Insights in ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 173258 ArcGIS Mission Manager for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 154293 ArcGIS Navigator for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 166931 ArcGIS Survey123 for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 169018 ArcGIS QuickCapture for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 166790 ArcGIS Workforce for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 12.3 ArcGIS Enterprise App Bundles - Perpetual License Prices 166974 ArcGIS Enterprise Essential Apps Bundle Perpetual License $200.00 $200.00 166975 ArcGIS Enterprise Field Apps Bundle Perpetual License $600.00 $660.00 166976 ArcGIS Enterprise Office Apps Bundle Perpetual License $400.00 $440.00 12.3 ArcGIS Enterprise App Bundles - Maintenance Prices 167265 ArcGIS Enterprise Essential Apps Bundle Maintenance $50.00 $55.00 167266 ArcGIS Enterprise Field Apps Bundle Maintenance $150.00 $165.00 167267 ArcGIS Enterprise Office Apps Bundle Maintenance $100.00 $110.00 12.3 ArcGIS Enterprise App Bundles - Annual Subscription Prices 166901 ArcGIS Enterprise Essential Apps Bundle Annual Subscription $50.00 $55.00 166902 ArcGIS Enterprise Field Apps Bundle Annual Subscription $150.00 $165.00 166903 ArcGIS Enterprise Office Apps Bundle Annual Subscription $100.00 $110.00 12.4 ArcGIS Pro Extensions for ArcGIS Enterprise - Perpetual License Prices 166984 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166985 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166986 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166987 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166988 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166989 ArcGIS Publisher for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166990 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166992 ArcGIS Workflow Manager for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166991 ArcGIS Image Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166993 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $2,500.00 $2,750.00 166994 ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Extensions Perpetual License $7,500.00 $8,250.00 174914 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $5,000.00 $5,500.00 180803 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License #N/A $11,000.00 166995 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $10,000.00 $11,000.00 174918 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $10,000.00 $11,000.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 168 Page 36 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 174916 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License $10,000.00 $11,000.00 180801 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License #N/A $11,000.00 178808 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License #N/A $11,000.00 180349 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Perpetual License #N/A $11,000.00 12.4 ArcGIS Pro Extensions for ArcGIS Enterprise - Maintenance Prices 167275 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167276 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167277 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167278 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167279 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167280 ArcGIS Publisher for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167281 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167283 ArcGIS Workflow Manager for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167282 ArcGIS Image Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167284 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $500.00 $550.00 167285 ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Extensions Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 174915 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $1,250.00 $1,375.00 180804 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 167286 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 174919 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 174917 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,750.00 180802 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 178809 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 180350 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Maintenance #N/A $2,750.00 12.4 ArcGIS Pro Extensions for ArcGIS Enterprise - Annual Subscription Prices 166941 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166942 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166943 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166944 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166945 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166946 ArcGIS Publisher for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166947 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166950 ArcGIS Workflow Manager for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166949 ArcGIS Image Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166951 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166953 ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Extensions Annual Subscription $1,800.00 $1,950.00 174921 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $2,000.00 $2,175.00 180727 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $4,350.00 166956 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,350.00 174923 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,350.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 169 Page 37 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 174925 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,350.00 180726 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $4,350.00 178806 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $4,350.00 180348 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $4,350.00 12.5 ArcGIS Runtime Extensions for ArcGIS Enterprise 12.5 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension - Perpetual, Maintenance, Subscription Prices 173379 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Perpetual License $1,000.00 $1,100.00 173380 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Maintenance $200.00 $220.00 173377 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription $200.00 $220.00 ArcGIS Online User Types, User Type Extensions, Apps, and Extensions 2022 Price 2023 Price 13 ArcGIS Online User Types - Annual Subscription Prices 153147 ArcGIS Online Viewer Annual Subscription $100.00 $110.00 153148 ArcGIS Online Creator Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 165531 ArcGIS Online Editor Annual Subscription $200.00 $220.00 165533 ArcGIS Online Mobile Worker Annual Subscription $350.00 $385.00 165535 ArcGIS Online GIS Professional Basic Annual Subscription $700.00 $765.00 165536 ArcGIS Online GIS Professional Standard Annual Subscription $2,750.00 $3,025.00 165537 ArcGIS Online GIS Professional Advanced Annual Subscription $3,800.00 $4,150.00 153418 ArcGIS Online Service Credits; Block of 1,000 $100.00 $120.00 13.1 ArcGIS Online User Type Extensions - Annual Subscription Prices 165666 ArcGIS Image User Type Extension for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $700.00 $770.00 179339 ArcGIS GeoBim User Type Extension for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $200.00 182294 ArcGIS Location Sharing User Type Extension for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $65.00 13.2 ArcGIS Online Apps - Annual Subscription Prices 165553 ArcGIS Pro Advanced Online Annual Subscription $3,600.00 $3,950.00 165551 ArcGIS Pro Basic Online Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 165552 ArcGIS Pro Standard Online Annual Subscription $2,550.00 $2,800.00 182292 ArcGIS Field Maps for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $65.00 165547 ArcGIS Collector for ArcGIS Online Term License $60.00 $65.00 157007 ArcGIS Community Analyst Web App Online Annual Subscription $100.00 $100.00 180146 ArcGIS Drone2Map Standard for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $1,750.00 180147 ArcGIS Drone2Map Advanced for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $3,500.00 154421 Esri Redistricting (USA Only) for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $4,500.00 $4,950.00 150543 ArcGIS GeoPlanner for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 159044 ArcGIS Insights in ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $500.00 $550.00 157002 ArcGIS Navigator for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 169043 ArcGIS QuickCapture for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 165546 ArcGIS Survey123 for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 165545 ArcGIS Workforce for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $60.00 $65.00 167926 ArcGIS CityEngine for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $2,000.00 $2,200.00 178731 ArcGIS Urban for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $3,000.00 $3,300.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 170 Page 38 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 13.3 ArcGIS Online App Bundles - Annual Subscription Prices 165542 ArcGIS Online Essential Apps Bundle Annual Subscription $50.00 $55.00 165543 ArcGIS Online Field Apps Bundle Annual Subscription $150.00 $165.00 165544 ArcGIS Online Office Apps Bundle Annual Subscription $100.00 $110.00 169044 ArcGIS Urban Suite Online Annual Subscription $3,300.00 $4,400.00 13.4 ArcGIS Pro Extensions for ArcGIS Online - Annual Subscription Prices 165554 ArcGIS 3D Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165555 ArcGIS Data Interoperability for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165556 ArcGIS Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165557 ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165558 ArcGIS Network Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165559 ArcGIS Publisher for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165560 ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165561 ArcGIS Workflow Manager for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 159070 ArcGIS Image Analyst for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 166996 ArcGIS LocateXT for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $600.00 $650.00 165562 ArcGIS Pro Online Extensions Annual Subscription $1,800.00 $1,950.00 165569 ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,350.00 165568 ArcGIS Defense Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,350.00 165567 ArcGIS Production Mapping for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,350.00 180725 ArcGIS Roads and Highways (Location Referencing) for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription #N/A $4,350.00 165563 ArcGIS Aviation Airports for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $2,000.00 $2,175.00 165565 ArcGIS Aviation Charting for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription #N/A $4,350.00 165566 ArcGIS Maritime for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,350.00 180347 ArcGIS Indoors for ArcGIS Pro Online Annual Subscription #N/A $4,350.00 13.5 ArcGIS Runtime Extensions for ArcGIS Online 13.5 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension - Annual Subscription Price 173340 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription $200.00 $220.00 13.6 ArcGIS Business Analyst Web App for ArcGIS Online 13.6 ArcGIS Business Analyst Web App - Annual Subscription Prices 178622 ArcGIS Business Analyst Advanced Online Bundle Annual Subscription $5,000.00 $5,000.00 178623 ArcGIS Business Analyst Web App Advanced Online Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,000.00 178624 ArcGIS Business Analyst Standard Online Bundle Annual Subscription $1,100.00 $1,100.00 178625 ArcGIS Business Analyst Web App Standard Online Annual Subscription $100.00 $100.00 ArcGIS Online - Other 2022 Price 2023 Price 14 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store 14 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store - Annual Subscription Prices 157564 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-1 Annual Subscription $10,800.00 $10,800.00 157565 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-2 Annual Subscription $21,600.00 $21,600.00 157566 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-3 Annual Subscription $43,200.00 $43,200.00 165652 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-4 Annual Subscription $86,400.00 $86,400.00 157591 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-1 Monthly Subscription $1,000.00 $1,000.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 171 Page 39 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 157592 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-2 Monthly Subscription $2,000.00 $2,000.00 157593 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-3 Monthly Subscription $4,000.00 $4,000.00 165653 ArcGIS Online Premium Feature Data Store M-4 Monthly Subscription $8,000.00 $8,000.00 14.1 ArcGIS Hub 14.1 ArcGIS Hub - Annual Subscription Prices 159166 ArcGIS Hub Premium ArcGIS Online Community Annual Subscription $10,000.00 $10,000.00 159168 ArcGIS Hub Premium Additional 1000 ArcGIS Online Community Creator Annual Subscription $1,000.00 $1,000.00 159169 ArcGIS Hub Premium Additional ArcGIS Online Credits $100.00 $100.00 159171 ArcGIS Hub Premium Unlimited ArcGIS Online Community Population Less than 1,000,000 Annual Subscription $40,000.00 $40,000.00 159173 ArcGIS Hub Premium Unlimited ArcGIS Online Community Population Greater than 1,000,000 Annual Subscription $80,000.00 $80,000.00 ArcGIS Velocity - US Region 2022 Price 2023 Price 15 ArcGIS Velocity - US Region - Annual Subscription Prices 165630 ArcGIS Velocity Standard US Region Annual Subscription $20,000.00 $20,000.00 165627 ArcGIS Velocity Advanced US Region Annual Subscription $45,000.00 $45,000.00 173315 ArcGIS Velocity Dedicated US Region Annual Subscription $90,000.00 $90,000.00 173317 ArcGIS Velocity Dedicated Compute Units US Region Annual Subscription $25,000.00 $25,000.00 165628 ArcGIS Velocity Advanced Storage Units US Region Annual Subscription $4,000.00 $4,000.00 173318 ArcGIS Velocity Dedicated Storage Units US Region Annual Subscription $10,000.00 $10,000.00 165629 ArcGIS Velocity Advanced Item Units US Region Annual Subscription $20,000.00 $12,000.00 Site Scan for ArcGIS 2022 Price 2023 Price 16 Site Scan for ArcGIS - Annual Subscription Prices 173632 Site Scan Single Access USA Hosted Annual Subscription $500.00 $500.00 173625 Site Scan Single Operator USA Hosted Annual Subscription $5,000.00 $5,000.00 174920 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 50,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $25,000.00 $25,000.00 174931 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 100,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $40,000.00 $40,000.00 174932 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 150,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $57,500.00 $57,500.00 174933 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 200,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $77,500.00 $77,500.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 172 Page 40 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 174934 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 300,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $105,000.00 $105,000.00 174935 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 500,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $165,000.00 $165,000.00 174936 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 750,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $227,500.00 $227,500.00 174937 Site Scan for ArcGIS USA Hosted Custom 1 Year Subscription not to exceed 1,000,000 Images per year Initial allocation includes 10 Site Scan Single Operator Term Licenses and 50 Site Scan Single Access Term Licenses Additional licenses can be increased upon request. $282,500.00 $282,500.00 ArcGIS Indoors (Maps and Spaces) and ArcGIS IPS for ArcGIS Enterprise and Online 2022 Price 2023 Price 17 ArcGIS Indoors Maps - Annual Subscription Prices 181060 ArcGIS Indoors Maps for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $22,000.00 181071 ArcGIS Indoors Maps for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $22,000.00 17.1 ArcGIS Indoors Spaces - Annual Subscription Prices 181076 ArcGIS Indoors Spaces for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $11,000.00 181077 ArcGIS Indoors Spaces for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $11,000.00 17.2 ArcGIS IPS - Annual Subscription Prices 170706 ArcGIS IPS for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription #N/A $11,000.00 180700 ArcGIS IPS for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription #N/A $11,000.00 ArcGIS Image Dedicated 2022 Price 2023 Price 18 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Tiled - Subscription Prices 165600 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Tiled Imagery Server Annual Subscription #N/A $16,000.00 165605 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Tiled Imagery Additional Server Annual Subscription #N/A $8,000.00 165606 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Tiled Imagery Server 90 Day License #N/A $6,000.00 165607 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Tiled Imagery Additional Server 90 Day License #N/A $3,000.00 18.1 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Dynamic - Subscription Prices 165608 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Dynamic Imagery Server Annual Subscription #N/A $28,000.00 165609 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Dynamic Imagery Additional Server Annual Subscription #N/A $14,000.00 165612 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Dynamic Imagery Server 90 Day License #N/A $10,500.00 165613 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Dynamic Imagery Additional Server 90 Day License #N/A $5,250.00 165615 ArcGIS Image Dedicated Services Prepaid Plan #N/A $5,000.00 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Engine 2022 Price 2023 Price 19 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Engine 172172 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Engine Connected Prepaid Plan; 50,000 hours #N/A $17,500.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 173 Page 41 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 172181 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Engine 10,000 Additional Hours #N/A $3,500.00 183061 ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Engine Disconnected Unlimited Prepaid Plan #N/A $150,000.00 Business Analyst 2022 Price 2023 Price Business Analyst - US State Data Bundle Options 2022 Price 2023 Price ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro 20 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise - Perpetual License Prices 182034 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US State Data Bundle Perpetual License #N/A $11,450.00 182073 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US State Data Bundle and MPI Data Perpetual License #N/A $19,335.00 20 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise - Maintenance Prices 182079 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US State Data Bundle Maintenance #N/A $9,175.00 182083 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US State Data Bundle and MPI Data Maintenance #N/A $15,460.00 20 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise - Annual Subscription Prices 182035 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US State Data Bundle Annual Subscription #N/A $10,150.00 182074 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US State Data Bundle and MPI Data Annual Subscription #N/A $17,120.00 20 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Online - Annual Subscription Prices 182086 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Online with US State Data Bundle Annual Subscription #N/A $10,150.00 182090 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Online with US State Data Bundle and MPI Data Annual Subscription #N/A $17,120.00 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop 20.1 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Single and Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 154565 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle Single Use License $10,165.00 $10,878.00 155733 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle Concurrent Use License $10,165.00 $11,182.00 20.1 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Single and Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 154658 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle Single Use Maintenance $8,560.00 $9,175.00 155753 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle Concurrent Use Maintenance $8,560.00 $9,415.00 20.1 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Single and Concurrent Use - Annual Subscription Prices 154566 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle Single Use Annual Subscription $8,835.00 $9,643.00 20.1 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with MPI Data - Single and Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 154574 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle with MPI Data Single Use License $17,152.00 $18,368.00 155738 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle with MPI Data Concurrent Use License $17,152.00 $18,862.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 174 Page 42 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 20.1 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with MPI Data - Single and Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 154662 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle with MPI Data Single Use Maintenance $14,450.00 $15,460.00 155757 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle with MPI Data Concurrent Use Maintenance $14,450.00 $15,895.00 20.1 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with MPI Data - Single and Concurrent Use - Annual Subscription Prices 154575 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US State Data Bundle with MPI Data Single Use Annual Subscription $14,915.00 $16,264.00 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop 20.2 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Perpetual License Prices 154556 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 5 Total Data Users License $9,880.00 $9,880.00 158173 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 10 Total Data Users License $15,200.00 $15,200.00 154588 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 15 Total Data Users License $18,240.00 $18,240.00 154600 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 25 Total Data Users License $20,900.00 $20,900.00 154612 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 50 Total Data Users License $24,700.00 $24,700.00 158183 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 100 Total Data Users License $30,780.00 $30,780.00 20.2 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Maintenance Prices 154666 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 5 Total Data Users Maintenance $8,300.00 $8,300.00 158213 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 10 Total Data Users Maintenance $12,800.00 $12,800.00 154672 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 15 Total Data Users Maintenance $15,300.00 $15,300.00 154678 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 25 Total Data Users Maintenance $17,600.00 $17,600.00 154684 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 50 Total Data Users Maintenance $20,800.00 $20,800.00 158219 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 100 Total Data Users Maintenance $25,900.00 $25,900.00 20.2 Extended Data Users with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server - Perpetual License Prices 154582 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 5 Total Data Users License $13,110.00 $13,110.00 158177 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 10 Total Data Users License $20,235.00 $20,235.00 154594 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 15 Total Data Users License $24,320.00 $24,320.00 154606 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 25 Total Data Users License $27,835.00 $27,835.00 154618 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 50 Total Data Users License $32,870.00 $32,870.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 175 Page 43 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 158189 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 100 Total Data Users License $41,040.00 $41,040.00 20.2 Extended Data Users with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server - Maintenance Prices 154669 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 5 Total Data Users Maintenance $11,000.00 $11,000.00 158216 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 10 Total Data Users Maintenance $17,000.00 $17,000.00 154675 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 15 Total Data Users Maintenance $20,500.00 $20,500.00 154681 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 25 Total Data Users Maintenance $23,500.00 $23,500.00 154687 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 50 Total Data Users Maintenance $27,700.00 $27,700.00 158222 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 100 Total Data Users Maintenance $34,500.00 $34,500.00 20.2 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Annual Subscription Prices 154557 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 5 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $8,550.00 $8,550.00 158174 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 10 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $13,110.00 $13,110.00 154589 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 15 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $15,770.00 $15,770.00 154601 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 25 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $18,050.00 $18,050.00 154613 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 50 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $21,375.00 $21,375.00 158184 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 100 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $26,600.00 $26,600.00 20.2 Extended Data Users with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server - Annual Subscription Prices 154583 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 5 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $11,400.00 $11,400.00 158178 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 10 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $17,575.00 $17,575.00 154595 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 15 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $21,090.00 $21,090.00 154607 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 25 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $24,130.00 $24,130.00 154619 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 50 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $28,500.00 $28,500.00 158190 Extended Data Users US State Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 100 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $35,530.00 $35,530.00 Business Analyst - US Regional Data Bundle Options 2022 Price 2023 Price ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro 20.3 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise - Perpetual License Prices 182032 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US Regional Data Bundle Perpetual License #N/A $18,355.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 176 Page 44 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 182071 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US Regional Data Bundle and MPI Data Perpetual License #N/A $28,010.00 20.3 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise - Maintenance Prices 182078 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US Regional Data Bundle Maintenance #N/A $14,705.00 182082 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US Regional Data Bundle and MPI Data Maintenance #N/A $22,390.00 20.3 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise - Annual Subscription Prices 182033 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US Regional Data Bundle Annual Subscription #N/A $16,250.00 182072 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Enterprise with US Regional Data Bundle and MPI Data Annual Subscription #N/A $24,760.00 20.3 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Online - Annual Subscription Prices 182085 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Online with US Regional Data Bundle Annual Subscription #N/A $16,250.00 182089 ArcGIS Business Analyst Pro for ArcGIS Online with US Regional Data Bundle and MPI Data Annual Subscription #N/A $24,760.00 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop 20.4 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Single and Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 154563 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle Single Use License $16,293.00 $17,437.00 155732 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle Concurrent Use License $16,293.00 $17,922.00 20.4 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Single and Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 154657 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle Single Use Maintenance $13,720.00 $14,705.00 155752 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle Concurrent Use Maintenance $13,720.00 $15,090.00 20.4 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Single and Concurrent Use - Annual Subscription Prices 154564 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle Single Use Annual Subscription $14,155.00 $15,438.00 20.4 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with MPI Data - Single and Concurrent Use - Perpetual License Prices 154572 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data Single Use License $24,843.00 $26,610.00 155737 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data Concurrent Use License $24,843.00 $27,322.00 20.4 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with MPI Data - Single and Concurrent Use - Maintenance Prices 154661 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data Single Use Maintenance $20,920.00 $22,390.00 155756 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data Concurrent Use Maintenance $20,920.00 $23,010.00 20.4 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with MPI Data - Single and Concurrent Use - Annual Subscription Prices DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 177 Page 45 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 154573 ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop with US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data Single Use Annual Subscription $21,565.00 $23,522.00 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop 20.5 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Perpetual License Prices 154554 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 5 Total Data Users License $14,820.00 $14,820.00 158171 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 10 Total Data Users License $22,800.00 $22,800.00 154586 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 15 Total Data Users License $27,360.00 $27,360.00 154598 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 25 Total Data Users License $31,350.00 $31,350.00 154610 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 50 Total Data Users License $37,050.00 $37,050.00 158181 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 100 Total Data Users License $46,170.00 $46,170.00 20.5 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Maintenance Prices 154665 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 5 Total Data Users Maintenance $12,500.00 $12,500.00 158212 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 10 Total Data Users Maintenance $19,200.00 $19,200.00 154671 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 15 Total Data Users Maintenance $23,000.00 $23,000.00 154677 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 25 Total Data Users Maintenance $26,400.00 $26,400.00 154683 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 50 Total Data Users Maintenance $31,200.00 $31,200.00 158218 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 100 Total Data Users Maintenance $38,900.00 $38,900.00 20.5 Extended Data Users for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop - Annual Subscription Prices 154555 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 5 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $12,825.00 $12,825.00 158172 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 10 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $19,760.00 $19,760.00 154587 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 15 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $23,750.00 $23,750.00 154599 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 25 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $27,170.00 $27,170.00 154611 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 50 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $32,110.00 $32,110.00 158182 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop Up to 100 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $39,995.00 $39,995.00 20.5 Extended Data Users with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server - Perpetual License Prices 154560 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 5 Total Data Users License $19,665.00 $19,665.00 158175 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 10 Total Data Users License $30,400.00 $30,400.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 178 Page 46 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 154592 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 15 Total Data Users License $36,480.00 $36,480.00 154604 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 25 Total Data Users License $41,800.00 $41,800.00 154616 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 50 Total Data Users License $49,400.00 $49,400.00 158187 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 100 Total Data Users License $61,560.00 $61,560.00 20.5 Extended Data Users with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server - Maintenance Prices 154668 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 5 Total Data Users Maintenance $16,600.00 $16,600.00 158215 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 10 Total Data Users Maintenance $25,600.00 $25,600.00 154674 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 15 Total Data Users Maintenance $30,700.00 $30,700.00 154680 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 25 Total Data Users Maintenance $35,200.00 $35,200.00 154686 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 50 Total Data Users Maintenance $41,600.00 $41,600.00 158221 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 100 Total Data Users Maintenance $51,800.00 $51,800.00 20.5 Extended Data Users with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server - Annual Subscription Prices 154581 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 5 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $17,100.00 $17,100.00 158176 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 10 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $26,315.00 $26,315.00 154593 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 15 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $31,635.00 $31,635.00 154605 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 25 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $36,195.00 $36,195.00 154617 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 50 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $42,750.00 $42,750.00 158188 Extended Data Users US Regional Data Bundle with MPI Data for ArcGIS Business Analyst Desktop and Server Up to 100 Total Data Users Annual Subscription $53,295.00 $53,295.00 Developer Technology 2022 Price 2023 Price 21 ArcGIS Runtime Deployment Licenses - Perpetual Prices 154141 ArcGIS Runtime Basic 50 Pack Single Use Deployment Perpetual License $4,885.00 $4,885.00 154142 ArcGIS Runtime Standard 25 Pack Single Use Deployment Perpetual License $7,327.00 $7,327.00 154143 ArcGIS Runtime Advanced 5 Pack Single Use Deployment Perpetual License $7,327.00 $7,327.00 154144 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension 5 Pack Single Use Deployment Perpetual License $4,885.00 $4,885.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 179 Page 47 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 21 ArcGIS Runtime Deployment Licenses - Maintenance Prices 154145 ArcGIS Runtime Basic 50 Pack Single Use Deployment Maintenance $1,000.00 $1,000.00 154146 ArcGIS Runtime Standard 25 Pack Single Use Deployment Maintenance $1,500.00 $1,500.00 154147 ArcGIS Runtime Advanced 5 Pack Single Use Deployment Maintenance $1,500.00 $1,500.00 154148 ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension 5 Pack Single Use Deployment Maintenance $1,000.00 $1,000.00 21.1 ArcGIS Runtime Utility Network Extension - Perpetual and Maintenance Prices 173450 ArcGIS Runtime Utility Network Extension 5 Pack Single Use Deployment Perpetual License $4,000.00 $4,000.00 173451 ArcGIS Runtime Utility Network Extension 5 Pack Single Use Deployment Maintenance $1,500.00 $1,500.00 21.2 ArcGIS Developer Subscription Plans - Single Use - Annual Subscription Prices 157022 ArcGIS Developer Builder Annual Subscription $1,319.00 $1,319.00 157023 ArcGIS Developer Professional Annual Subscription $1,759.00 $1,759.00 157021 ArcGIS Developer Premium Annual Subscription $3,224.00 $3,224.00 157024 ArcGIS Developer Enterprise Annual Subscription $4,201.00 $4,201.00 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium 2022 Price 2023 Price ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise and Online - North America 22 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise - North America - Annual Subscription Pricing 182008 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise USA Annual Subscription #N/A $6,000.00 182009 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Canada Annual Subscription #N/A $4,800.00 182010 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Mexico Annual Subscription #N/A $4,800.00 182022 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise USA State Annual Subscription #N/A $2,000.00 182023 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Canadian Province Annual Subscription #N/A $2,000.00 176116 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise North America (USA, Canada, and Mexico) Annual Subscription #N/A $12,000.00 182024 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding USA Annual Subscription #N/A $3,000.00 182025 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding Canada Annual Subscription #N/A $2,400.00 182026 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding Mexico Annual Subscription #N/A $2,400.00 182027 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding USA State Annual Subscription #N/A $1,000.00 182028 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding Canadian Province Annual Subscription #N/A $1,000.00 182029 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding North America Annual Subscription #N/A $6,000.00 22 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online - North America - Annual Subscription Pricing 182046 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online USA Annual Subscription #N/A $6,000.00 182047 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Canada Annual Subscription #N/A $4,800.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 180 Page 48 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 182048 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Mexico Annual Subscription #N/A $4,800.00 182049 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online USA State Annual Subscription #N/A $2,000.00 182050 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Canadian Province Annual Subscription #N/A $2,000.00 176000 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online North America (USA, Canada, and Mexico) Annual Subscription #N/A $12,000.00 182052 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Map Display + Geocoding USA Annual Subscription #N/A $3,000.00 182053 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Map Display + Geocoding Canada Annual Subscription #N/A $2,400.00 182054 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Map Display + Geocoding Mexico Annual Subscription #N/A $2,400.00 182055 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Map Display + Geocoding USA State Annual Subscription #N/A $1,000.00 182056 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Map Display + Geocoding Canadian Province Annual Subscription #N/A $1,000.00 182057 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium for ArcGIS Pro Online Map Display + Geocoding North America Annual Subscription #N/A $6,000.00 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop 22.1 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop - USA State - Annual Subscription Prices 133080 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop USA State Single Use Annual Subscription $2,000.00 $2,000.00 133081 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop USA State Concurrent Use Annual Subscription $5,000.00 $5,000.00 133113 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop Map Display + Geocoding USA State Single Use Annual Subscription $1,000.00 $1,000.00 133114 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop Map Display + Geocoding USA State Concurrent Use Annual Subscription $2,500.00 $2,500.00 22.1 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise - USA State - Annual Subscription Prices 133082 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise USA State Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $25,000.00 $25,000.00 133083 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise USA State Two Additional Cores Annual Subscription $10,000.00 $10,000.00 133115 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding USA State Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $12,500.00 $12,500.00 133116 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding USA State Two Additional Cores Annual Subscription $5,000.00 $5,000.00 22.1 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop - USA - Annual Subscription Prices 133072 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop USA Single Use Annual Subscription $6,000.00 $6,000.00 133073 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop USA Concurrent Use Annual Subscription $15,000.00 $15,000.00 133085 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop Map Display + Geocoding USA Single Use Annual Subscription $3,000.00 $3,000.00 133086 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop Map Display + Geocoding USA Concurrent Use Annual Subscription $7,500.00 $7,500.00 22.1 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise - USA - Annual Subscription Prices 133074 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise USA Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $75,000.00 $75,000.00 133075 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise USA Two Additional Cores Annual Subscription $30,000.00 $30,000.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 181 Page 49 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 133087 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding USA Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $37,500.00 $37,500.00 133088 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding USA Two Additional Cores Annual Subscription $15,000.00 $15,000.00 22.1 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop - North America (United States, Canada, and Mexico) - Annual Subscription Prices 133066 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop North America Single Use Annual Subscription $12,000.00 $12,000.00 133067 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop North America Concurrent Use Annual Subscription $30,000.00 $30,000.00 133121 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop Map Display + Geocoding North America Single Use Annual Subscription $6,000.00 $6,000.00 133122 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Desktop Map Display + Geocoding North America Concurrent Use Annual Subscription $15,000.00 $15,000.00 22.1 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise - North America (United States, Canada, and Mexico) - Annual Subscription Prices 133068 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise North America Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $150,000.00 $150,000.00 133069 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise North America Two Additional Cores Annual Subscription $60,000.00 $60,000.00 133123 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding North America Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription $75,000.00 $75,000.00 133124 ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Enterprise Map Display + Geocoding North America Two Additional Cores Annual Subscription $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Training 2022 Price 2023 Price 23 Instructor-Led Training and Solutions 96246 Public Training Class (per day - per student)$750.00 $895.00 96247 Private Training Class Instructor-Led at Client Site (per Day, up to 15 Students)$7,750.00 $10,920.00 183412 Private Instructor Led Online Training Per Day per Class of 15 Students #N/A $8,890.00 183413 Private Instructor Led Training at Esri Site Per Day per Class of 15 Students #N/A $9,845.00 88994 Additional Students (per Student, per Day)$560.00 $675.00 143262 Client Coaching Online (per Day, up to 15 Students)#N/A $7,535.00 115949 Client Coaching at Esri Site (per Day, up to 15 Students)$6,400.00 $8,340.00 115950 Client Coaching at Client Site (per Day, up to 15 Students)#N/A $9,250.00 162891 Mobile Lab (per r/t shipping event)$2,050.00 $2,385.00 173070 Recorded WGNU $395.00 $430.00 23 Esri Pre-Paid Training 174382 Training Pass $750.00 $895.00 23 Esri E-Learning in the Customer's Learning Management System 154953 Esri E-Learning (SCORM Format) License $88,275.00 $88,275.00 23 Esri Academy LMS Integration Subscription 175922 EALI Plan 1 (up to 50 users)$12,500.00 $14,900.00 175923 EALI Plan 2 (up to 100 users)$15,000.00 $17,880.00 175925 EALI Plan 3 (up to 150 users)$17,500.00 $20,860.00 175926 EALI Plan 4 (up to 200 users)$20,000.00 $23,840.00 175927 EALI Plan 5 (up to 250 users)$22,500.00 $26,820.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 182 Page 50 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 175928 EALI Plan 6 (up to 300 users)$25,000.00 $29,800.00 175929 EALI Plan 7 (up to 400 users)$27,500.00 $32,780.00 175930 EALI Plan 8 (up to 500 users)$30,000.00 $35,755.00 175912 EALI Plan 9 (up to 600 users)$32,500.00 $38,735.00 175913 EALI Plan 10 (up to 750 users)$35,000.00 $41,715.00 175914 EALI Plan 11 (up to 1,000 users)$37,500.00 $44,695.00 23 Technical Certification 132198 Certification Core Exam Voucher $250.00 $250.00 166858 Certification Specialty Exam Voucher $150.00 $150.00 23 Abridged Classes 183414 Private Instructor Led Online 2 Day Class Abridged From 3 Days per Class of 15 Students #N/A $20,005.00 183415 Private Instructor Led Training at Esri Site 2 Day Class Abridged From 3 Days per Class of 15 Students #N/A $22,150.00 183416 Private Instructor Led Training at Client Site 2 Day Class Abridged From 3 Days per Class of 15 Students #N/A $24,570.00 183417 Private Instructor Led Online 1-Day Class Abridged From 2 Days per Class of 15 Students #N/A $13,335.00 183418 Private Instructor Led Training at Esri Site 1 Day Class Abridged From 2 Days per Class of 15 Students #N/A $14,770.00 183419 Private Instructor Led Training at Client Site 1 Day Class Abridged From 2 Days per Class of 15 Students #N/A $16,380.00 Support and Services 2022 Price 2023 Price 24 Premium Support Services 117208 Premium Support Annual Use—Unlimited Incidents $44,300.00 $47,800.00 136727 Premium Support Annual Use—Up to 10 Incidents $17,200.00 $18,700.00 134062 Premium Support Additional Authorized Contact—Unlimited Incidents $11,400.00 $12,400.00 State and Local Government Public Safety Named Users*2022 Price 2023 Price 25 *The Public Safety Named Users are available to State and Local Government Public Safety Agencies only. Specifically, law enforcement, emergency management, fire, emergency medical services, or dispatch. These agencies must qualify under Esri Public Safety Agency Program. Participation and purchase must be approved by the Esri Public Safety Team. 153407 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Viewer in Continually Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $50.00 $55.00 153408 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Creator in Continually Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $250.00 $275.00 168618 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Editor in Continually Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $100.00 $110.00 168619 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Mobile Worker in Continually Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $175.00 $193.00 157503 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program Enterprise Creator in Continually Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $250.00 $275.00 168626 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Enterprise Editor in Continually Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $100.00 $110.00 168627 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Enterprise Mobile Worker in Continually Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $175.00 $193.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 183 Page 51 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 157500 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Viewer in Surge Environment Annual Subscription $150.00 $165.00 157501 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Creator in Surge Environment Annual Subscription $750.00 $825.00 157505 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program Enterprise Creator in Surge Environment Annual Subscription $750.00 $825.00 168620 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Editor in Surge Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $300.00 $330.00 168621 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Online Mobile Worker in Surge Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $525.00 $578.00 168628 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Enterprise Editor in Surge Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $300.00 $330.00 168629 State and Local Public Safety Named User Program ArcGIS Enterprise Mobile Worker in Surge Staffed Environment Annual Subscription $525.00 $578.00 Professional Services All items below are for Professional Services & may be subject to escalation on January 1st of each calendar year 2022 Price 2023 Price 26 WebGIS Launch Kits 173265 Web GIS Launch Kit (3 Days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 170525 Emergency Management Operations Launch Kit (5 Days)$22,600.00 $24,300.00 158231 ArcGIS GeoPlanner Launch Kit (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 159941 Market Planning Launch Kit Basic (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 159942 Market Planning Launch Kit Advanced (5 days)$22,600.00 $24,300.00 168540 3D Launch Kit (3 Days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 170994 HUB Launch Kit (3 days)$13,000.00 $13,000.00 172844 Maps and Apps Launch Kit (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 26 Jumpstart Packages 153636 ArcGIS Enterprise Jumpstart - Basic (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 153637 ArcGIS Enterprise Jumpstart - Standard (4 days)$19,000.00 $20,525.00 153638 ArcGIS Enterprise Jumpstart - Advanced (4 days)$30,100.00 $33,175.00 125360 ArcGIS Image Extension for Server Jumpstart (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 162626 ArcGIS Monitor Jumpstart (3 days)$14,400.00 $15,400.00 133167 Data Appliance for ArcGIS Jumpstart (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 133168 Data Appliance for ArcGIS and ArcGIS for Server Bundle Jumpstart (5 days)$22,600.00 $24,300.00 158230 GeoEvent Server Jumpstart (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 26 Retainer Service Packages 158344 Configuration Engineer Services Retainer (20 hours remote or 1 day onsite) $6,500.00 $7,000.00 158347 Geospatial Analyst Services Retainer (20 hours remote or 1 day onsite)$6,500.00 $7,000.00 158343 Developer Services Retainer (20 hours remote or 1 day onsite)$6,500.00 $7,000.00 158346 Geodatabase Administrator Services Retainer (20 hours remote or 1 day onsite)$7,300.00 $7,850.00 158348 Business Consultant Services Retainer (20 hours remote or 1 day onsite)$7,300.00 $7,850.00 26 Services Packages 122351 Enterprise GIS Health Check (3 days)$15,500.00 $16,750.00 162627 Remote Support for ArcGIS Monitor (20 hours)$7,300.00 $7,850.00 158229 UI/UX Expert Review (20 hours)$7,300.00 $7,850.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 184 Page 52 of 52 Esri Proprietary and Confidential Information 152467 Capacity Planning Support (10 hours)$3,250.00 $3,500.00 26 Crisis Support Packages 172367 Crisis Support (3 Days)$14,900.00 $16,025.00 172368 Crisis Support - Continuation On Site Support (1 day)$3,400.00 $3,625.00 172369 Crisis Support Remote Support (20 Hours)$5,500.00 $5,975.00 26 Professional GIS Services Packages 128705 Professional GIS Services Package - Standard $22,500.00 $24,300.00 128706 Professional GIS Services Package - Advanced $26,800.00 $28,900.00 26 Esri Enterprise Advantage Program 97717 Esri Enterprise Advantage Program (EEAP) 100 Learning and Service Credits and 100 Technical Advisor Hours $95,400.00 $103,500.00 144584 Esri Enterprise Advantage Program (EEAP) 50 Learning and Service Credits and 100 Technical Advisor Hours $65,400.00 $70,900.00 165514 Esri Advantage Program Advisor Services #N/A $39,650.00 111005 Esri Advantage Program Zero Learning and Services Credits Renewal $35,400.00 $38,300.00 97719 Additional EEAP Technical Advisor Services (100 Hours)$26,600.00 $28,800.00 97720 Additional EEAP 100 Learning and Service Credits $60,000.00 $65,200.00 103032 Additional EEAP 50 Learning and Service Credits $30,000.00 $32,600.00 DocuSign Envelope ID: 43A03197-DBEB-4B04-BB15-CEA942A40B55 185 December 28, 2022 ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade Support Prepared for: Gail Jorgenson City of Bozeman 20 E Olive St Bozeman, MT 59715 Esri Quote Number: P014298 186 P014298 City of Bozeman ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade 1 December 28, 2022 Introduction: The City of Bozeman (City) has requested Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (Esri) Professional Services to provide consulting services for supporting an ArcGIS Enterprise migration and upgrade. The quote below describes the scope of services, schedule, pricing, terms and conditions, and purchasing instructions. Scope of Services: Activity 1 ArcGIS Enterprise Migration Support Esri will provide up to 30 hours of remote consulting services to assist the City with the development of a technical migration plan to support the migration of ArcGIS Enterprise systems and content from the current state environment to the City’s future state environment. During this activity, Esri will provide recommendations and best practices on moving users, groups, and/or content to the future state environment. It is anticipated that consulting services will include the following topics: • Review of current ArcGIS Enterprise deployment, including users, application patterns, previous architectural decisions, and known pain points. • Review of target environment, drivers for migration, considerations for target system, and readiness of software for migration. • Providing support to complete a content inventory of the existing system, including items, data, and web services. • Review of content inventory to identify potential content that can be archived, other complicated or problematic item types, etc. • Discussions on any environment-specific architectural changes that the City will need to make moving from their existing architecture to their new architecture. • Develop a sequence for executing the migration process, methods for which may include: o Join-site o WebGISDR o Component-level backup/restore o File copy and configure o Python-based, scripted content migration o Export tools o Distributed collaboration o Manual republishing o Third-party tools 187 P014298 City of Bozeman ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade 2 December 28, 2022 This activity will be supported remotely from Esri’s offices. The Esri consultant will work with direction from the City’s technical staff and management. Esri will prepare a brief migration plan document containing our findings and recommendations, which the City can use to guide further migration activities or complete the migration activity themselves. Activity 2 ArcGIS Enterprise Upgrade Support Esri will provide up to 106 hours of consulting services to assist the City with an ArcGIS Enterprise upgrade to version 10.9.1. It is anticipated that consulting services will include the following topics: • Discuss requirements for new ArcGIS 10.9.1 Enterprise environment. • Installation and configuration of ArcGIS Enterprise 10.9.1. • Configuring and using your ArcGIS organization. Esri anticipates that one consultant will support the production upgrade in this activity for up to four consecutive business days on-site at the City’s facilities in Bozeman, Montana. The Esri consultant will work with direction from the City’s technical staff and management. Following the on-site visit, remaining hours will be used for testing, documentation, and can also be used for ad-hoc support. Esri Responsibilities • Provide up to 136 hours of consulting services as described above. City Responsibilities • Communicate consulting needs and priorities to the Esri consultant. • Provide the appropriate City staff members to work with the Esri consultant. • Provide the Esri consultant with access the City’s data and system environment, as necessary. Assumptions • Pricing assumes Activity 2 will include one trip covering four consecutive business days for one Esri consultant from Esri’s offices in Olympia, Washington to the City’s offices in Bozeman, Montana. • On-site consulting time is based on an estimate of up to 8 hours per day. • Pricing assumes Activity 1 will be provided remotely from Esri’s offices during Esri’s normal business hours and no travel will be required of the Esri consultant. • Remote support will be provided during the standard Esri working hours of Monday- Friday, 9 AM-5 PM Pacific Standard Time. 188 P014298 City of Bozeman ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade 3 December 28, 2022 • Remote support will be conducted via email, telephone, and webcast. • Esri will not be responsible for data clean-up, if needed. • Non-Esri-based systems will not be migrated or upgraded. • Consulting support is limited to Esri commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software, and will not include any non-Esri-based systems. Schedule: The schedule will be mutually agreed upon between the City and Esri within 10 days after contract award with anticipated end date of June 30, 2023. Pricing: The pricing provided below has been estimated based upon an anticipated award of a Time-and- Materials (T&M) contract. The required labor hours, including preparation and travel time, and other burdened direct cost items (ODCs) have been estimated based upon prior experience with work of a similar nature. The total not-to-exceed (NTE) price for the quoted Scope of Services is $40,523. This price is exclusive of any applicable federal, state and/or local taxes for which Esri may collect and the City shall remain responsible. Esri anticipates using staff from the Technology Consultant/Engineer (S1) labor category; however, depending on the level of expertise required to perform certain activities during this engagement, Esri may be required to utilize other Esri staff members with a different skill-set and labor category. T&M consulting services will be conducted under the following conditions: • In the event Esri completes the Scope of Services for less than the NTE budget, the City will only be invoiced for the actual hours expended plus ODCs. • In the event Esri reaches the NTE budget limit before the Scope of Services is completed, the City will have the option to either (a) increase the contract funding in order to allow the work to continue; or (b) instruct Esri to stop work. If the City chooses to stop work, Esri will do so without liability. • Esri reserves the right to reallocate the project funding between Scope of Services activities and/or ODCs, as necessary to facilitate the work effort, provided the overall contract price is not exceeded. 189 P014298 City of Bozeman ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade 4 December 28, 2022 All work will be accomplished in accordance with the Scope of Services with the deliverable being consulting time. If additional work is requested by the City in writing beyond the scope of this quote, Esri will provide an updated quote. Esri will perform and invoice Services on a time and materials basis using the labor categories and rates specified for the performance period. Labor, including travel time, will be invoiced on a monthly basis for actual hours expended during the previous month. Meals will be invoiced on a “per diem” basis in accordance with the full daily limits stated in the most current Federal Travel Regulations. Other direct costs (ODCs), including travel-related expenses and meal per diem, will include a fifteen percent (15%) burden. Invoices are to be paid within 30 days of receipt. This quote is valid for a period of 90 days from the submittal date above. Terms and Conditions: By purchasing these services, the customer agrees to the terms and conditions contained in the State of Montana Master Purchase Agreement (Esri Agreement #00221730.0 formerly 2004MPA3427) between Esri and City effective 28 October 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”). Purchasing: To order these services as quoted, please notify Alex Muñoz of the contract award using the information provided below. Thereafter, Alex Muñoz will engage Esri's Contract Administrator to draft the necessary T&M Task Order issued under the existing Agreement, in accordance with the details of this quote. When we receive these completed documents, Esri will contact you to discuss staff assignment and schedule. We look forward to supporting you. 190 P014298 City of Bozeman ArcGIS Enterprise Migration and Upgrade 5 December 28, 2022 Contact: Alex Muñoz Esri Professional Services 380 New York St Redlands, CA 92373 909-793-2853 ext. 1597 amunoz@esri.com www.esri.com 191 J7264-a 2023 1 October 2022 TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2023 Hourly time and materials labor category descriptions and rates have been provided for each labor category for calendar year 2023. The hourly labor rates for services that are performed after 2023 may be escalated in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) each year. Other direct costs, such as travel, reproduction, subcontractor, telecommunication/freight, or materials, will be charged a material handling fee and invoiced. Technology Consultant/Engineer (S1) Staff members in this labor category provide day-to-day technology consulting, troubleshooting, and engineering services on many aspects of project implementation. These projects include COTS software configuration, custom software development, database consulting, training development and delivery, technical documentation, and other technology consulting and engineering services. Individuals in this category have specialized skills and experience with a variety of technologies that can be applied to a broad spectrum of assignments. Senior Technology Consultant/Engineer (S2) Staff members in this labor category provide strategic technology consulting and engineering services across project implementation. These staff may provide technical leadership services, architecture and design services, as well as training development and delivery for small to moderately complex solutions. Individuals in this category have higher-level specialized skills and experience with a variety of technologies that can be applied to a broad spectrum of assignments. Principal Technology Consultant/Engineer (S3) Staff members in this labor category work as technical leads and/or senior technical advisers, providing technology vision, solution architecture, and strategic technology consulting for projects of all sizes and scopes. These staff may provide strategic technology design & planning, oversight of technical implementation activities, solution architecture and database design, system integration, and other technology training, consulting, and engineering services. Individuals in this category have advanced, diverse, and specialized skills and experience with a variety of technologies that can be applied to a broad spectrum of complex assignments. Staff members in this labor category work with senior client staff in coordination with Esri senior management to resolve issues and support a successful project completion. 192 J7264-a 2023 2 October 2022 Consultant/Project Manager (M1) Staff members in this labor category provide day-to-day consulting for and management of many aspects of GIS and related technology projects. The scope of these projects may include database development and administration, training, technical support, business process design and development, definition of work plans, project management of technical and contractual deliverables, and ad hoc consulting. For complex projects, these individuals may team with senior staff to develop comprehensive work plans that address risk, schedule, and budget management and provide the framework for project implementation. Senior Consultant/Project Manager (M2) Staff members in this labor category provide strategic consulting and management services for complex GIS and related technology projects. These staff members have market/application domain expertise with extensive experience in various technologies required to support the successful completion of a project. Consulting activities may include strategic planning, implementation of change management methodologies and system integration, and training, as well as project management oversight of project deliverables and subcontractors. These individuals may also design comprehensive work plans that address risk, schedule, and budget management and provide the framework for project implementation. Principal Consultant/Program Manager (M3) Staff members in this labor category work as program directors or project advisers, providing project vision, strategic consulting, and program management activities for GIS and related technology projects. Consulting activities may include strategic planning, oversight of requirements definitions, application and database design, system integration, curriculum development and help desk system architecture. Management activities may include providing oversight on defining program requirements and objectives, establishing budgets and schedules, as well as allocating staff and other resourcing activities. Technology Support Specialist (DB) Staff members in this labor category work in professional entry-level roles to support definable activities of larger technology projects. Working with technical and management leads and mentors, these staff provide support to technology projects as assigned. 193 J7264-a 2023 3 October 2022 Current Rates by Labor Category Labor Category Rate Technology Consultant/Engineer (S1) $276 Senior Technology Consultant/Engineer (S2) $358 Principal Technology Consultant/Engineer (S3) $438 Consultant/Project Manager (M1) $334 Senior Consultant/Project Manager (M2) $423 Principal Consultant/Program Manager (M3) $556 Technology Support Specialist (DB) $232 194 Copyright © 2022 Esri All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Notice of Proprietary Information: The information in the attached document is proprietary to Esri and contains commercial or financial information or trade secrets that are confidential and exempt from disclosure to the public under the Freedom of Information Act. This information shall not be disclosed outside of Customer’s organization (except for consultants under a confidentiality obligation who are involved in the proposal evaluation process) without Esri’s prior permission, and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to Esri as a result of this information, the Customer shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the contract. This restriction does not limit the Customer’s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. Esri, the Esri globe logo, ArcGIS, esri.com, and other Esri marks used in this document are trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of Esri in the United States, the European Community, or certain other jurisdictions. Other companies and products or services mentioned herein may be trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of their respective mark owners. 195 Activity 2: ArcGIS Enterprise Support Upgrade Test environment: 20 hours • Pre-upgrade environment validation: 5 hours o Check system resources and hard drive space o Validate certificate o Validate federation o Validate registered data stores o Check ArcGIS Server and Portal system properties o Describedatastore o Confirm credentials: Front-end admin account(s), service account(s), geodatabase admin o Confirm location of directories o backups o Troubleshoot as needed • In-place upgrade of 1 Portal, 1 ArcGIS Server, 1 ArcGIS Data Store, 2 Web Adaptors, and geodatabase(s): 11 hours o Portal: 3 hours o ArcGIS Server: 3 hours o ArcGIS Data Store: 3 hours o Web Adaptors: 1 hour o Geodatabases: 1 hour • Post-upgrade testing and patching: 4 hours o Run patches with built-in patch tool o Environment validate led by Esri Consultant o Workflow validation led by Bozeman team Production environment: 40 hours • Pre-upgrade environment validation: 10 hours o Check system resources and hard drive space o Validate certificate o Validate federation o Validate registered data stores o Check ArcGIS Server and Portal system properties o Describedatastore o Confirm credentials: Front-end admin account(s), service account(s), geodatabase admin o Confirm location of directories o backups o Troubleshoot as needed • In-place upgrade of 1 Portal, 5 ArcGIS Server, 2 ArcGIS Data Store, 4 Web Adaptors, and geodatabase(s): 25 hours o Portal: 3 hours o ArcGIS Server: 15 hours 196 o ArcGIS Data Store: 5 hours o Web Adaptors: 1 hour o Geodatabases: 1 hour • Post-upgrade testing and patching: 5 hours o Run patches with built-in patch tool o Environment validate led by Esri Consultant o Workflow validation led by Bozeman team Documentation: 10 hours Prep/Ad-hoc/follow up support: 20 hours Travel: 16 hours 197 Task Order No. 3 (00317140.0) issued under MPA No. 00221730.0 00317140.0 (TO 3)/NKS Page 1 of 6 13 February 2023 MPA# 00221730.0 In accordance with the terms and conditions of the above-referenced Agreement between Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. ("Esri"), and State of Montana, City of Bozeman (“Licensee”) this Task Order authorizes preparation and provision of the Scope of Work described and in accordance with the terms, schedule, and start/end date(s) specified below. 1. Scope of Work: Esri shall provide the Services specified in Exhibit 1, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. In addition to the foregoing, Customer agrees that its employees, representatives, and subcontractors will cooperate and communicate with Esri during performance of this Task Order. Without cost to Esri, Customer shall provide, allow access to, or assist Esri in obtaining all data Esri requests for performance of this Task Order, including, but not limited to, (1) copies of previously prepared reports, maps, plans, surveys, records, and other documents in the control or possession of Customer and (2) copies of ordinances, codes, regulations, or other governmental documents. 2. Contract Type: Time and Materials 3. Task Not-to-Exceed Value: $40,523. See Exhibit 2 – Pricing, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 4. Customer Address for the Receipt of Esri Invoices: City of Bozeman Strategic Services/GIS Department P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 5. Period of Performance: The services defined in this Task Order shall expire June 30, 2023. 6. Special Considerations: N/A 7. Esri Project Manager: Sarah Park | 909-369-4893 | sarah.park@esri.com Esri Senior Contract Administrator: Noelle Santos | 909-369-5323 ext. 5323 | nsantos@esri.com Customer Project Manager: Gail Jorgenson | 406-582-2972 | gjorgenson@bozeman.net Customer Contract Administrator: Jon Henderson | 406-582-22502 | Jon.Henderson@bozeman.net ACCEPTED AND AGREED: ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS City of Bozeman, State of Montana RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (Licensee) (Esri) Signature: Signature: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: 198 00317140.0 (TO 3)/NKS Page 2 of 5 13 February 2023 MPA# 00221730.0 Exhibit 1 to Task Order No. 2 Esri Master Purchase Agreement No. 00221730.0 Scope of Services: Activity 1 ArcGIS Enterprise Migration Support Esri will provide up to 30 hours of remote consulting services to assist the City with the development of a technical migration plan to support the migration of ArcGIS Enterprise systems and content from the current state environment to the City’s future state environment. During this activity, Esri will provide recommendations and best practices on moving users, groups, and/or content to the future state environment. It is anticipated that consulting services will include the following topics: • Review of current ArcGIS Enterprise deployment, including users, application patterns, previous architectural decisions, and known pain points. • Review of target environment, drivers for migration, considerations for target system, and readiness of software for migration. • Providing support to complete a content inventory of the existing system, including items, data, and web services. • Review of content inventory to identify potential content that can be archived, other complicated or problematic item types, etc. • Discussions on any environment-specific architectural changes that the City will need to make moving from their existing architecture to their new architecture. • Develop a sequence for executing the migration process, methods for which may include: o Join-site o WebGISDR o Component-level backup/restore o File copy and configure o Python-based, scripted content migration o Export tools o Distributed collaboration o Manual republishing o Third-party tools This activity will be supported remotely from Esri’s offices. The Esri consultant will work with direction from the City’s technical staff and management. Esri will prepare a brief migration plan document containing our findings and recommendations, which the City can use to guide further migration activities or complete the migration activity themselves. 199 00317140.0 (TO 3)/NKS Page 3 of 5 13 February 2023 MPA# 00221730.0 Activity 2 ArcGIS Enterprise Upgrade Support Esri will provide up to 106 hours of consulting services to assist the City with an ArcGIS Enterprise upgrade to version 10.9.1. It is anticipated that consulting services will include the following topics: • Discuss requirements for new ArcGIS 10.9.1 Enterprise environment. • Installation and configuration of ArcGIS Enterprise 10.9.1. • Configuring and using your ArcGIS organization. Esri anticipates that one consultant will support the production upgrade in this activity for up to four consecutive business days on-site at the City’s facilities in Bozeman, Montana. The Esri consultant will work with direction from the City’s technical staff and management. Following the on-site visit, remaining hours will be used for testing, documentation, and can also be used for ad-hoc support. Esri Responsibilities • Provide up to 136 hours of consulting services as described above. City Responsibilities • Communicate consulting needs and priorities to the Esri consultant. • Provide the appropriate City staff members to work with the Esri consultant. • Provide the Esri consultant with access the City’s data and system environment, as necessary. Assumptions • Pricing assumes Activity 2 will include one trip covering four consecutive business days for one Esri consultant from Esri’s offices in Olympia, Washington to the City’s offices in Bozeman, Montana. • On-site consulting time is based on an estimate of up to 8 hours per day. • Pricing assumes Activity 1 will be provided remotely from Esri’s offices during Esri’s normal business hours and no travel will be required of the Esri consultant. • Remote support will be provided during the standard Esri working hours of Monday- Friday, 9 AM-5 PM Pacific Standard Time. • Remote support will be conducted via email, telephone, and webcast. • Esri will not be responsible for data clean-up, if needed. • Non-Esri-based systems will not be migrated or upgraded. 200 00317140.0 (TO 3)/NKS Page 4 of 5 13 February 2023 MPA# 00221730.0 • Consulting support is limited to Esri commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software, and will not include any non-Esri-based systems. 201 00317140.0 (TO 3)/NKS Page 5 of 5 13 February 2023 MPA# 00221730.0 Exhibit 2 to Task Order No. 2 Esri Master Purchase Agreement No. 00221730.0 Pricing The total Not-to-Exceed (NTE) price for this Task Order is $40,523. The table below provide a summary of rates of Labor Category. Labor Category Rate Technology Consultant/Engineer (S1) $276 Senior Technology Consultant/Engineer (S2) $358 Principal Technology Consultant/Engineer (S3) $438 Consultant/Project Manager (M1) $334 Senior Consultant/Project Manager (M2) $423 Principal Consultant/Program Manager (M3) $556 Technology Support Specialist (DB) $232 *Note: Esri reserves the right to re-allocate the project funding between Scope of Work activities, as necessary to facilitate the work effort, provided the overall contract price is not exceeded. 202 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Taylor Lonsdale, Transportation Engineer Nicholas Ross, Director of Transportation and Engineering SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Professional Services Agreement with Sanderson Stewart for the Transportation Engineering Term Contract MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Sanderson Stewart or the Transportation Engineering Term Contract STRATEGIC PLAN:2.2 Infrastructure Investments: Strategically invest in infrastructure as a mechanism to encourage economic development. BACKGROUND:The City of Bozeman is experiencing rapid growth and expansion of the transportation system. To support the Department of Transportation and Engineering’s work to address the increasing demand for transportation engineering that has come with this growth Sanderson Stewart was selected for the Transportation Engineering Term Contract through a request for qualifications. Services under this contract may include: traffic engineering studies, capital project scoping, signal optimization, project design, or pilot project implementation. Work under this agreement will be implemented at the discretion of the Director of Transportation and Engineering through Task Orders under the contract. Staff anticipates running several task orders in parallel. Each task orders will have an identified scope of work and budget. Task Orders will come in front of Commission for authorization as consent items. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:None identified or recommended. FISCAL EFFECTS:Fees for this work were budget for and will be paid from the Engineering Operating Budget. Attachments: 20230228_PSA Engineering Term Contract.pdf Report compiled on: February 9, 2023 203 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 1 of 12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and, Sanderson Stewart, 106 E Babcock Street Suite L1, Bozeman MT, 59715, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” The City and Contractor may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose: City agrees to enter this Agreement with Contractor to perform Transportation Engineering services for the City as requested by written Task Order and as described in the Task Order. 2. Term/Effective Date: This Agreement is effective upon the Effective Date and will expire on the 31st day of December, 2024, or upon completion of the last Task Order issued prior to 31st day of December, 2024. 3. Scope of Services: Contractor will perform the work and provide the services in accordance with the individual written Task Orders executed under the authority of this agreement and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the Contractor. Task Orders shall be in a format similar to Exhibit “A”, attached to and made part of this agreement. Each Task Order will include a detailed Scope of Work and associated budget. For conflicts between this Agreement and the Scope of Work in the Task Order, unless specifically provided otherwise, the Agreement governs. 4. Payment: The terms of compensation to the Contractor shall be agreed upon and included in each Task Order. City agrees to pay Contractor the amount specified in the individual Task Orders. Any alteration or deviation from the described services that involves additional costs above the Agreement amount will be performed by Contractor after written request by the City, and will become an additional charge over and above the amount listed in the Scope of Services. The City must agree in writing upon any additional charges. 204 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 2 of 12 5. Contractor’s Representations: To induce City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor makes the following representations: a. Contractor has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of this Agreement, the Scope of Services, and with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress or performance of the Scope of Services. b. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has the experience and ability to perform the services required by this Agreement; that it will perform the services in a professional, competent and timely manner and with diligence and skill; that it has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement and grant the rights granted in it; and that its performance of this Agreement shall not infringe upon or violate the rights of any third party, whether rights of copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, libel, slander or any other rights of any nature whatsoever, or violate any federal, state and municipal laws. The City will not determine or exercise control as to general procedures or formats necessary to have these services meet this warranty. 6. Independent Contractor Status/Labor Relations: The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this Agreement and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies handbook and may not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 39, Chapter 71, Montana Code Annotated (MCA), and the Occupational Disease Act of Montana, Title 39, Chapter 71, MCA. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all members and employees of Contractor’s business, except for those members who are exempted by law. Contractor shall furnish the City with copies showing one of the following: (1) a binder for workers’ compensation coverage by an insurer licensed and authorized to provide workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Montana; or (2) proof of exemption from workers’ compensation granted by law for independent contractors. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement, any labor problems or disputes of any type arise or materialize which in turn cause any services to cease for any period of time, Contractor specifically agrees to take immediate steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that 205 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 3 of 12 Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. Contractor shall provide immediate relief to the City so as to permit the services to continue at no additional cost to City. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and liabilities arising out of, resulting from, or occurring in connection with any labor problems or disputes or any delays or stoppages of work associated with such problems or disputes. 7. Indemnity/Waiver of Claims/Insurance: For other than professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and officers (collectively referred to for purposes of this Section as the City) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, fees and costs (including attorney’s fees and the costs and fees of expert witness and consultants), losses, expenses, liabilities (including liability where activity is inherently or intrinsically dangerous) or damages of whatever kind or nature connected therewith and without limit and without regard to the cause or causes thereof or the negligence of any party or parties that may be asserted against, recovered from or suffered by the City occasioned by, growing or arising out of or resulting from or in any way related to: (i) the negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of the Contractor; or (ii) any negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of any of the Contractor’s agents. For the professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless against claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses, including reasonable defense attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Contractor or Contractor’s agents or employees. Such obligations shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist. The indemnification obligations of this Section must not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any common-law or statutory rights of the City as indemnitee(s) which would otherwise exist as to such indemnitee(s). Contractor’s indemnity under this Section shall be without regard to and without any right to contribution from any insurance maintained by City. Should the City be required to bring an action against the Contractor to assert its right to defense or indemnification under this Agreement or under the Contractor’s applicable insurance policies required below, the City shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in asserting its right to indemnification or defense but only if a court of competent jurisdiction determines the Contractor was obligated to defend the claim(s) or was obligated to indemnify the City for a claim(s) or any portion(s) thereof. 206 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 4 of 12 In the event of an action filed against the City resulting from the City’s performance under this Agreement, the City may elect to represent itself and incur all costs and expenses of suit. Contractor also waives any and all claims and recourse against the City, including the right of contribution for loss or damage to person or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to the performance of this Agreement except “responsibility for [City’s] own fraud, for willful injury to the person or property of another, or for violation of law, whether willful or negligent” as per 28-2-702, MCA. These obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement and the services performed hereunder. In addition to and independent from the above, Contractor shall at Contractor’s expense secure insurance coverage through an insurance company or companies duly licensed and authorized to conduct insurance business in Montana which insures the liabilities and obligations specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance coverage shall not contain any exclusion for liabilities specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance shall cover and apply to all claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses that may be asserted or claimed against, recovered from, or suffered by the City without limit and without regard to the cause therefore and which is acceptable to the City. Contractor shall furnish to the City an accompanying certificate of insurance and accompanying endorsements in amounts not less than as follows: Workers’ Compensation – statutory; Employers’ Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; Commercial General Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 property damage/bodily injury per accident; and Professional Liability - $1,000,000 per claim; $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The above amounts shall be exclusive of defense costs. The City shall be endorsed as an additional or named insured on a primary non-contributory basis on the Commercial General, Employer’s Liability, and Automobile Liability policies. The insurance and required endorsements must be in a form suitable to City and shall include no less than a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Contractor shall notify City within two (2) business days of Contractor’s receipt of 207 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 5 of 12 notice that any required insurance coverage will be terminated or Contractor’s decision to terminate any required insurance coverage for any reason. The City must approve all insurance coverage and endorsements prior to the Contractor commencing work. 8. Termination for Contractor’s Fault: a. If Contractor refuses or fails to timely do the work, or any part thereof, or fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, or otherwise breaches any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City may, by written notice, terminate this Agreement and the Contractor’s right to proceed with all or any part of the work (“Termination Notice Due to Contractor’s Fault”). The City may then take over the work and complete it, either with its own resources or by re-letting the contract to any other third party. b. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 8, Contractor shall be entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered. c. Any termination provided for by this Section 8 shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled under the law or at equity. d. In the event of termination under this Section 8, Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 9. Termination for City’s Convenience: a. Should conditions arise which, in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, make it advisable to the City to cease performance under this Agreement, the City may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Contractor (“Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience”). The termination shall be effective in the manner specified in the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience and shall be without prejudice to any claims that the City may otherwise have against Contractor. b. Upon receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, unless otherwise directed in the Notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease performance under this Agreement and make every reasonable effort to refrain from continuing work, incurring additional expenses or costs under this Agreement and shall immediately cancel all existing 208 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 6 of 12 orders or contracts upon terms satisfactory to the City. Contractor shall do only such work as may be necessary to preserve, protect, and maintain work already completed or immediately in progress. c. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 9, Contractor is entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered on or before the receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience. d. The compensation described in Section 9(c) is the sole compensation due to Contractor for its performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 10. Limitation on Contractor’s Damages; Time for Asserting Claim: a. In the event of a claim for damages by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor’s damages shall be limited to contract damages and Contractor hereby expressly waives any right to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature or kind. b. In the event Contractor wants to assert a claim for damages of any kind or nature, Contractor shall provide City with written notice of its claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding and giving rise to the claim, and the total amount of damages sought by the claim, within thirty (30) days of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the claim. In the event Contractor fails to provide such notice, Contractor shall waive all rights to assert such claim. 11. Representatives and Notices: a. City’s Representative: The City’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Taylor Lonsdale, PE or such other individual as City shall designate in writing. Whenever approval or authorization from or communication or submission to City is required by this Agreement, such communication or submission shall be directed to the City’s Representative and approvals or authorizations shall be issued only by such Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when City’s Representative is not available, Contractor may direct its communication or submission to other designated City personnel or agents as designated by the City in writing and may receive approvals or 209 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 7 of 12 authorization from such persons. b. Contractor’s Representative: The Contractor’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Joey Staszcuk, PE, PTOE, RSP1 or such other individual as Contractor shall designate in writing. Whenever direction to or communication with Contractor is required by this Agreement, such direction or communication shall be directed to Contractor’s Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when Contractor’s Representative is not available, City may direct its direction or communication to other designated Contractor personnel or agents. c. Notices: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided to the Representatives named in this Section. Notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered by courier to Party’s address shown above during normal business hours of the recipient; or when sent, if sent by email or fax (with a successful transmission report) to the email address or fax number provided by the Party’s Representative; or on the fifth business day following mailing, if mailed by ordinary mail to the address shown above, postage prepaid. 12. Permits: Contractor shall provide all notices, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, including a City of Bozeman business license, and inspections from applicable governmental authorities, and pay all fees and charges in connection therewith. 13 Laws and Regulations: Contractor shall comply fully with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and municipal ordinances including, but not limited to, all workers’ compensation laws, all environmental laws including, but not limited to, the generation and disposal of hazardous waste, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), the safety rules, codes, and provisions of the Montana Safety Act in Title 50, Chapter 71, MCA, all applicable City, County, and State building and electrical codes, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all non-discrimination, affirmative action, and utilization of minority and small business statutes and regulations. 14. Nondiscrimination and Equal Pay: The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position 210 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 8 of 12 require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 15. Intoxicants; DOT Drug and Alcohol Regulations/Safety and Training: Contractor shall not permit or suffer the introduction or use of any intoxicants, including alcohol or illegal drugs, by any employee or agent engaged in services to the City under this Agreement while on City property or in the performance of any activities under this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges it is aware of and shall comply with its responsibilities and obligations under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations governing anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention plans and related testing. City shall have the right to request proof of such compliance and Contractor shall be obligated to furnish such proof. The Contractor shall be responsible for instructing and training the Contractor's employees and agents in proper and specified work methods and procedures. The Contractor shall provide continuous inspection and supervision of the work performed. The Contractor is responsible for instructing its employees and agents in safe work practices. 16. Modification and Assignability: This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except by written agreement signed by both parties hereto. The Contractor may not subcontract or assign Contractor’s rights, including the right to compensation or duties arising hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Any subcontractor or assignee will be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 17. Reports/Accountability/Public Information: Contractor agrees to develop and/or provide documentation as requested by the City demonstrating Contractor’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Contractor shall allow the City, its auditors, and other persons authorized by the City to inspect and copy its books and records for the purpose of verifying that the reimbursement of monies distributed to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement was used in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. The 211 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 9 of 12 Contractor shall not issue any statements, releases or information for public dissemination without prior approval of the City. 18. Non-Waiver: A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of any terms or conditions of this Agreement does not limit the other party’s right to enforce such term or conditions or to pursue any available legal or equitable rights in the event of any subsequent default or breach. 19. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In the event it becomes necessary for either Party to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party or the Party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including the City Attorney’s Office staff. 20. Taxes: Contractor is obligated to pay all taxes of any kind or nature and make all appropriate employee withholdings. 21. Dispute Resolution: a. Any claim, controversy, or dispute between the parties, their agents, employees, or representatives shall be resolved first by negotiation between senior-level personnel from each party duly authorized to execute settlement agreements. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the parties may invite an independent, disinterested mediator to assist in the negotiated settlement discussions. b. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the dispute was first raised, then such dispute may only be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in compliance with the Applicable Law provisions of this Agreement. 22. Survival: Contractor’s indemnification shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for the maximum period allowed under applicable law. 23. Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not be construed as a part of the Agreement or as a limitation on the scope of the particular paragraphs to which they refer. 24. Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the balance thereof shall continue in effect. 212 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 10 of 12 25. Applicable Law: The parties agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. 26. Binding Effect: This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. 27. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties, does not constitute a third-party beneficiary agreement, and may not be relied upon or enforced by a third party. 28. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together constitute one instrument. 29. Integration: This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement of the parties. Covenants or representations not contained herein or made a part thereof by reference, are not binding upon the parties. There are no understandings between the parties other than as set forth in this Agreement. All communications, either verbal or written, made prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby abrogated and withdrawn unless specifically made a part of this Agreement by reference. 30. Consent to Electronic Signatures: The Parties have consented to execute this Agreement electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. 31. Extensions: this Agreement may, upon mutual agreement, be extended for a period of one year by written agreement of the Parties. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** 213 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 11 of 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written or as recorded in an electronic signature. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA Sanderson Stewart CONTRACTOR (Type Name Above) By________________________________ By__________________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Print Name: Danielle Scharf, PE, PTOE Print Title: Principal/Western Reg. Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 214 Professional Services Agreement for Transportation Engineering Term Contract Page 12 of 12 Exhibit A City of Bozeman Transportation Engineering Term Contract Task Order Number # Project: Issued under the authority of Transportation Engineering Term Contract Professional Services Agreement with Sanderson Stewart. This Task Order is dated __________ between the City of Bozeman and Sanderson Stewart (Contractor). The following representatives have been designated for the work performed under this Task Order: City: Contractor: SCOPE OF WORK: The scope for this task order is attached. COMPENSATION: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties authorized to commit resources of the parties have executed this Task Order: City of Bozeman Sanderson Stewart Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Danielle Scharf, Principal 215 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Gail Jorgenson, GIS Program Manager Jon Henderson, Strategic Services Director SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a First Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with Aero-Graphics, Inc. MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a First Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with Aero-Graphics, Inc. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.1 Outreach: Continue to strengthen and innovate in how we deliver information to the community and our partners. BACKGROUND:On December 6th, 2022, the City Commission approved the Scope of Work for Digital Ortho-imagery Acquisition with the contractor Aero-Graphics, Inc. This revision to the original Scope of Work allows for an additional deliverable, a sidewalk layer. The sidewalk layer will be in a File Geodatabase Feature Class format as a line feature class, suitable for use in ArcGIS software to support Engineering, Parks and Streets Maintenance. Aero-Graphics, Inc. was selected through a competitive RFQ/RFP process for professional services. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS: Funds to support this project are currently allocated in the FY23 approved budget for the GIS Division of the Strategic Services Department. Attachments: PSA Amendment_Digital Ortho-imagery Acquisition_Sidewalks.pdf Exhibit A-BozemanSidewalkLayerProposal2.pdf AeroGraphics, Inc 2023_Bozeman_Prop2_AGI.pdf Report compiled on: February 6, 2023 216 Firs Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Digital Ortho-imagery Acquisition FY 2022 – FY 2023 Page 1 of 3 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR Digital Ortho-imagery Acquisition dated December 6th, 2022 (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 202__, by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and Aero- Graphics, Inc, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Revising Scope. Adding additional scope of work per Exhibit A to include a sidewalks layer provided in line format to be stored and delivered in a file geodatabase. The boundary area to include a 100 foot buffer around the city limits and also to include all inholdings (county areas within the city). The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. 217 Firs Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Digital Ortho-imagery Acquisition FY 2022 – FY 2023 Page 2 of 3 Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 2. Agreement still valid. All remaining terms and provisions of the Agreement remain valid. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** 218 Firs Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Digital Ortho-imagery Acquisition FY 2022 – FY 2023 Page 3 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument the day and year first above written. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA Aero-Graphics, Inc. By________________________________ By_____________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Print Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 219 January 17, 2023 Gail Jorgenson GIS Program Manager City of Bozeman, MT P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Subject: Request for Proposals - Digital Orthoimagery – Line Sidewalk Layer Dear Gail, Aero-Graphics is pleased to respond with this proposal for a line sidewalk layer in conjunction with 2023 City of Bozeman Digital Orthoimagery project. Description of Proposed Solution Skilled stereocompilers will perform sidewalk collection within the 100 ft buffered boundary provided by the City. Kevin Reid, an ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist, will oversee the process to ensure quality procedures are adhered to. All data will be delivered in a File Geodatabase Feature Class as a line feature class, suitable for use in ArcGIS software. FGDC-compliant metadata files will be provided for all deliverables in XML format. Proposed schedule Contract Item Completion By Line Sidewalk layer and metadata June 30, 2023 220 Pricing Line Sidewalk Layer ..................................................................................................... $7,070 Pricing is valid for 90 days. Terms are Net 30 days with monthly invoices submitted for completed work. Bailey Costello, Project Manager Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of submitter 221 Aero-Graphics, Inc. Bailey Costello 40 West Oakland Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 84115 tel: 801.487.3273 fax: 801.487.3313 email: bcostello@aero-graphics.com City of Bozeman, Montana Request for Proposals Digital Orthoimagery October 21, 2022 222 October 21, 2022 Gail Jorgenson GIS Program Manager City of Bozeman, MT P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Subject: Request for Proposals - Digital Orthoimagery Dear Gail, Aero-Graphics is pleased to respond with this proposal for digital imagery acquisition and orthoimagery processing services as outlined in the above-referenced RFP. We have assembled a team of qualified professionals with the expertise necessary to deliver high-quality mapping and analysis on schedule at a cost-effective price. Please consider the following strengths that uniquely qualify the Aero-Graphics team for this contract: • Aero-Graphics has nearly 55 years of aerial mapping experience, including a working relationship with the City of Bozeman in 2018 and 2021. • Aero-Graphics owns and operates the best and latest equipment for aerial mapping. Our Vexcel UltraCam Eagle digital camera system provides unsurpassed data accuracy and quality. • Aero-Graphics is a full-service aerial mapping company with licensed Professional Land Surveyors on staff and a reliable Montana-licensed survey subcontractor (Robert Peccia & Associations) who has current experience working with the City of Bozeman providing civil engineering services. Should you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (801) 487-3273 or email at bcostello@aero-graphics.com. Thank you for considering Aero-Graphics for this contract. Sincerely, AERO-GRAPHICS, INC. Bailey Costello, Project Manager 223 City of Bozeman, MT Digital Orthoimagery Table of Contents a. Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 2 b. Firm Profile .................................................................................................. 2 c. Description of Proposed Solution ................................................................. 3 d. Scope of Project ......................................................................................... 11 e. Related Experience with Projects Similar to the Scope of Services .............. 12 f. Statement of Qualifications ........................................................................ 17 g. References ................................................................................................. 17 h. Present and Projected Workloads ............................................................... 18 i. Key Personnel ............................................................................................. 19 j. Additional Information ............................................................................... 24 k. Affirmation of Nondiscrimination & Equal Pay ............................................ 25 l. Pricing……………………………………… ................................................................ 26 224 2 | P a g e a. Executive Summary Aero-Graphics, Inc., an SBA-registered small business, highly values this opportunity to provide the City of Bozeman with digital orthoimagery and building footprints to support its regulatory, land management, planning, and engineering projects. Aero-Graphics is uniquely qualified and has demonstrated its proficiency at performing wide-area image acquisition projects on time, on budget, and of the highest quality for numerous County governments, regional consortiums, City governments, and Federal government agencies throughout the United States. We were honored to have the opportunity to perform the 2018 City of Bozeman Digital Orthoimagery and LiDAR Data Collection and the 2021 Digital Orthoimagery. We value the friendships we built during the project and are looking forward to working with you again. At every stage of the project, Aero-Graphics strives to add value above and beyond the minimum requirements. Our twin engine Cessna T310R and top-of-the-line Vexcel UltraCam Eagle (UCE) digital camera system will be assigned to the City of Bozeman Project. Along with its unmatched image quality, its large footprint and lower number of required exposures translates into fewer required flight lines and faster acquisition, allowing us to take advantage of critical narrow weather windows. In addition, the Eagle’s 100mm focal length provides a greater angle of incidence and thus exhibits less building and tree lean than competing 70mm focal length sensors. Above all, Aero-Graphics is recognized for its superior project management, responsiveness, and excellent communication. Weekly progress reports with clear visualizations of project status are provided and can easily be distributed to all project stakeholders. Aero-Graphics is confident that its strengths will ensure the success of the City of Bozeman project, as well as the long-term success of the City of Bozeman and its partners’ future projects. We look forward to an opportunity to demonstrate our capabilities on this contract. b. Firm Profile Aero-Graphics is the fastest growing geospatial company in the Intermountain West. We have been in business for over 55 years and have had the same stable ownership for the last 40 years. Aero-Graphics, Inc. Bailey Costello, Project Manager 40 West Oakland Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 84115 tel: 801.487.3273 fax: 801.487.3313 www.aero-graphics.com bcostello@aero-graphics.com 225 3 | P a g e c. Description of Proposed Solution Target Placement and Control Surveying | Prior to photography, Robert Peccia and Associates will target and survey the quality check shots in addition to the 16 aerial control points shown below in RED. Control will tie to both UTM Zone 12 and Montana State Plane Coordinates. Horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 (2011); Vertical datum shall be NAVD 1988. Working units shall be in Meters. Horizontal and vertical control for all targets will be accurate to within 5 cm. Aero-Graphics will provide a Survey Control Report to the City of Bozeman in XLS format with the following information included: AGPS/IMU coordinates (XYZ OPK), NAD83 Latitudes, NAD83 Longitudes, Project Eastings, Project Northings, Elevations, and description of equipment and software used in processing. Targets will be 1’ wide x 6’ arms. Targets will be in contrast with the ground and clearly visible from the air. Monuments will be flush with the ground (or otherwise noted in the control listing). 226 4 | P a g e Aircraft | Aero-Graphics owns and operates seven (7) aircraft, all based out of Bountiful, Skypark Airport KBTF, just minutes north of our main Salt Lake City office and processing center. Our twin-engine Cessna T310R and UltraCam Eagle digital camera system will be dedicated to the City of Bozeman Project to ensure proper and timely delivery. The UC Eagle is interchangeable between all seven aircraft. In the unlikely event that the assigned aircraft becomes unavailable, one of the others can replace it with ease. Each aircraft is maintained and operated with strict adherence to all FAA regulations. IFR instrumentation and other equipment necessary to operate within Class A airspace is standard on all our aircraft, and all are equipped with survey-grade GPS for precise acquisition over required areas. The sensor openings on the underside of each aircraft (pictured below) have been fabricated such that the camera lenses are open to the outside. Metal shields have been installed that protect the camera lenses from oil and exhaust, while leaving the camera’s field of view unobstructed. As part of Aero-Graphics’ Risk Management System (RMS), every lift requires a pre-flight inspection of the aircraft. This includes the following: • Fuel Level – Instrumental and Visual • Aileron and Control Surface freedom of movement • Engine Oil Level • Propeller Condition • Landing Gear Condition Our aircraft are professionally maintained by Aero Services, LLC located at our home base of Bountiful, Skypark Airport KBTF. Aero Services provides an on-the-shelf inventory of key parts for all of our aircraft, and prioritizes our planes’ maintenance and repairs above all others. When maintenance or repairs are required away from base, we carefully select trustworthy maintenance providers such as Tac Air, who understand the nature of aerial survey and will provide fast, quality service. Our twin-engine Cessna T310R and UltraCam Eagle digital camera system will be dedicated to the City of Bozeman Project to ensure proper and timely delivery. 227 5 | P a g e Digital Camera System | Aero-Graphics’ state-of-the-art Vexcel UltraCam Eagle (UCE) digital camera is noted as one of the finest digital camera systems currently available. It delivers 260 megapixels per image and the widest cross-track image format available in any frame-based sensor currently on the market. At 7.5cm GSD the swath covers nearly 1 mile on the ground. This configuration provides the best image-size to image- number balance, i.e., the larger footprint size allows a smaller number of images to cover the project boundary, which translates into fewer images to process, QC, and perform aerotriangulation, resulting in a faster delivery time. The UCE sensor collects visible light and near infrared imagery simultaneously at a 16-bit radiometric resolution and is equipped with Forward Motion Compensation (FMC). It features automatic exposure control through our flight management system but also allows for manual overrides when necessary. It is installed in a gyro-stabilized mount (GSM 3000) that is regularly maintained according to schedule and passively isolated from aircraft vibration through a series of specially manufactured springs and viscous dampers. In concert with the pilots’ strict training and talent in keeping the plane’s attitude as straight as possible, the GSM helps keep roll, pitch, and yaw angles true, even in windy or turbulent conditions. It automatically corrects up to 5° roll, 8.4° pitch, and 6.2° yaw in either direction from zero. The UCE is equipped with a Vexcel UltraNAV flight management system which integrates GPS and IMU into one cooperative unit, allowing image principal point accuracy to 3cm. It is important to note that each time the sensor is moved to a different aircraft, and before and after large acquisition projects, a boresight calibration is systematically performed. This enables us to measure and account for the natural angular misalignments between the camera and IMU and is imperative to maintaining accuracy. Our Quality Delivery System (QDS) requires on-ground lens cleaning, proper installation and cable/hardware inspections for the UCE and GSM, GPS/IMU statistics analysis, and test exposures before every mission. Flight Plan | Track’Air flight planning software is used to create flight plans for each area. This takes into account all project requirements, including boundaries and associated buffers, GSD, forward/sidelap, flightline orientations, etc. The plan is then verified for project conformity by another member of the Aerial Department. Special focus is given here to ensure that all area boundaries and buffers are stereo-covered and that no overlap or sidelap gaps exist, especially in areas with high relief. Flight plan coverage and specifications are displayed on the next page. Trimble Planning software is used to determine the Positional Dilution of Precision (PDOP) for the project location. PDOP is used as a gauge for the overall quality of the GPS signal. A PDOP value under 3.0 is desired for the best accuracy possible, and we strive to fly in PDOP windows below 3.0. In addition, we observe forecasts and always fly with a Kp Index below 4.0 to minimize geomagnetic field disturbances caused by solar particle radiation, which can negatively affect the quality of the GPS signal. 228 6 | P a g e Flight Execution | Prior to take-off, a ground verification of all aviation equipment and camera systems is performed to ensure everything is functional and safe. Once in the air, the flight management system (FMS) provides GPS-based guidance information to the first flight line. Calibration of all systems (FMS/GPS/IMU, as appropriate) takes place during a 5-minute initialization period before any exposures are taken. With the UCE, digital images are reviewed as they are collected to ensure they meet target project tolerances (position, ground conditions, smoke, clouds, shadows, etc.). Corrections for airplane roll, pitch, and yaw are performed automatically by the gyro- stabilized mount, which is controlled by the IMU and UltraNAV flight management system. All systems are constantly monitored during flight execution. With these QC steps in place, immediate reflights are undertaken if any component falls outside of specifications. At the end of the day, the camera operator performs a second review of the acquisition data en-route to that day’s base airport. Once the flight mission is complete, all data storage media and pilot flight logs are returned to Aero-Graphics for processing. City of Bozeman Flight Plan Specs Aircraft Cessna 310 Sensor UltraCam Eagle GSD 7.5cm Altitude (ft AGL) 4,757 Forward Overlap 60% Side Overlap 30% Lines 31 Images 668 Digital images are reviewed in the air as they are collected to ensure they meet project requirements, enabling immediate reflights if necessary. 229 7 | P a g e Post-Acquisition Image Inspection | Image inspection is one of the most important parts of our Quality Delivery System. Each image is viewed and graded by a post-flight inspector before insertion into the subsequent photogrammetric workflows. Inspection is conducted against the following parameters: • Proper project area coverage, buffer, flight direction, and sufficient overlap • Acceptable atmospheric and ground conditions • Images well-defined (free from blur) All results of inspection are retained in the production framework. Digital Image Processing | Vexcel UltraMap is a sophisticated application used in the initial color balancing of digital imagery from the UCE. It utilizes camera calibration, custom dodging, solar adjustment masks, high dynamic range, and location and date time of data to minimize hot spots and large variations in color and brightness. The resulting multi-lens, raw imagery (level00) is then pan-sharpened (at a 1:3 color-to-pan ratio) and converted to useable imagery (level03). Bit-depth resolution is also chosen at this stage (8-bit for this project). Sometimes sunspots and other atmospheric factors beyond our control affect the quality of the raw imagery. We have developed contrast enhancements and haze filters that can be used as necessary to minimize these issues. Image radiometry is a subjective process and the “ideal” can change from year to year even. Therefore Aero- Graphics is committed to adjusting the imagery multiple times to meet our clients’ needs. Image Radiometry | We perform statistical analysis of initial radiometry on selected images throughout the project area to make sure all terrain types meet project requirements. Radiometry is adjusted for certain terrain types if necessary. Preproduction samples will be furnished to the City for approval prior to full-scale production, and correct color balancing of the full image set will be reviewed by our aerotriangulation specialists prior to orthorectification. Every effort will be made to provide maximum detail in shadow areas. The imagery is checked against the clipping, contrast, brightness, and color balance parameters as directed by the City. GPS/IMU Data Post-Processing | After successful acquisition, and in parallel with image processing, raw GPS/IMU data is processed using Applanix POSPac MMS 8.0. At this stage, our Processing Manager performs QC of flight parameters (initialization, bank angles, proximity to bases, etc.). The process combines the raw trajectory of the aircraft with concurrently running base stations to refine the photo center (air point) coordinates (XYZ) and angles (Omega, Phi, Kappa, or roll, pitch, and yaw) of the sensor, and delivers up to 3cm accuracy. Each image is viewed and graded by a post- flight inspector before insertion into the subsequent photogrammetric workflows. 230 8 | P a g e Because the integrity and accuracy of our imagery on this project relies heavily on control from ABGPS/IMU, it is extremely important that our Processing Manager, a Licensed Professional Land Surveyor and Certified Photogrammetrist, conducts rigorous QC procedures and generates several reports and charts to verify the quality and accuracy of the data. These include PDOP, number of satellites, positional RMS, roll- pitch-yaw, and several other quality indicators. Omega-Phi-Kappa angles and altitude are checked at this point for conformity with project requirements. Aero-Graphics has been performing precision ABGPS/IMU processing since 1997. Both our Processing Manager and our AT/Ortho Manager have been formally trained in GPS/IMU processing through in-person Applanix University education from Applanix staff. This combination of experience and training lends strength to the efficiency and accuracy of our results. For example, we can discern which processing mode to use and in what situations it would yield more accurate results to process portions of a block individually rather than all together. GPS/IMU processing is the backbone of the accuracy for the City of Bozeman project. Analytical Aerotriangulation | Industry-leading Trimble-Inpho Match-AT software (Version 6.0) is utilized to perform fully analytical digital aerotriangulation for the block. Automatic tie points and refined GPS/IMU exposure centers (air points) extend full control for each stereo model. In this process we assign each air point to the principal point of its corresponding image, which gives an initial exterior orientation to each of the images. The image block is then stitched together by generating automatic tie points. These points tie each image to its neighbors in the same flightline and to those in adjacent flightlines. Ground control points are identified and measured, and these along with tie points, images, and air points are then processed together in a final bundle adjustment to refine the air points and provide the best orientation solution that minimizes cumulative error throughout the block. Our QC procedures are in place to find erroneous points and correct them before the AT results are used in subsequent processes. 231 9 | P a g e Once the AT solution is complete, we use Inpho’s DTMaster to check every model in stereo. We ensure that all parallax is cleared and that all tie points are on the ground – with no points floating or digging. Every control point must be on the center of the target and fall vertically within one-quarter of the applicable contour interval, based on flight height, of its surveyed position. The AT/Ortho Manager, a Certified Photogrammetrist and GIS Professional (GISP), verifies the integrity of each AT solution before it moves forward in the process. Our QC procedures are in place to find erroneous points and correct them before the AT results are used in subsequent processes. Orthorectification | Aero-Graphics will utilize existing DEM data from the 2021 project as the initial rectification surface. The surface is then inspected and edited to ensure that the resulting orthorectified imagery will be accurate and meet client specifications. The most common surface improvements include removing points from buildings, generally correcting surfaces, such as cliffs, that would warp the ortho, and adding breaklines where necessary, especially on bridges and overpasses. Upon completion of the surface modeling, each digital image undergoes automatic orthorectification in a one-step batch process using Trimble-Inpho’s OrthoMaster software. This process moves each pixel into its true geographic location, correcting for terrain relief displacement and offsets caused by aircraft tip and tilt. Final orthorectification and tile-to-tile color balancing is performed in Inpho’s OrthoMaster and OrthoVista which have proven to provide superior radiometric and seamline results. Seamlines are placed in areas of consistent tonal balance and between buildings and bridges. Aero-Graphics takes advantage of Inpho’s parallel processing features that allows multiple core processing of ortho tiles; this greatly expedites production. Orthorectified imagery is manipulated in Inpho’s OrthoVista software to compute subtle radiometric adjustments that compensate for visual effects within individual images. Multiple orthophotos are then combined into one seamless and geometrically perfect ortho mosaic for the entire project area. The ortho mosaic is then tiled according to the provided tiling scheme resulting in pixel perfect tiles that match perfectly with no overlap. OrthoVista then performs a tile-wide and project-wide color balance by adjusting adjacent images to match in color and brightness, thereby allowing for maximum possible detail in the imagery including shadow areas. Before full-scale production begins, pre-production image samples will be submitted to the City for approval. Imagery will be broken up into the City’s predefined tiling schemes. Ortho tiles will be delivered in both UTM Zone 12 NAD83 (2011) meters, NAVD88 meters and Montana State Plane NAD83 (2011) meters. Separate RGB and CIR image files will be delivered at a 7.5cm pixel resolution in uncompressed 24-bit TIFF and MrSID formats with associated world files. An overall MrSID mosaic will also be delivered at a 15cm (or desired) pixel size. Inpho’s distributed processing features allow multiple idle workstations to process ortho tiles simultaneously, greatly expediting turnaround time. 232 10 | P a g e Planimetric Data Collection | Skilled stereocompilers will perform building footprint updates within areas of change outlined by the City. Kevin Reid, an ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist, will oversee the process to ensure quality procedures are adhered to. New or modified features will be collected and attributed according to specifications listed in the referenced RFP. Collected features will include building footprints (updated from 2021 dataset). Building footprints will be attributed with maximum height above ground. All data will be delivered in a File Geodatabase Feature Class, suitable for use in ArcGIS software. Quality Control | Aero-Graphics prides itself on rigorous quality control procedures. Orthoimagery and surface data is produced outside the designated digital boundary and then cut back to the boundary to assure thorough coverage of each project area. The orthoimagery is then inspected by a QC Inspector completely removed from the project, where linear and above-ground features are reviewed to detect misalignment and warping, and where final radiometry conformance is verified. In addition, the AT/Ortho Manager, a Certified Photogrammetrist and GIS Professional (GISP), oversees the compilation process to ensure that the surface collection and orthorectification meet client specifications. The Project Manager and AT/Ortho Manager spot-check all deliverables for correct color balance, accuracy, and data integrity prior to delivery. Metadata | FGDC-compliant metadata files will be provided for all deliverables in XML format. Metadata for orthorectified imagery will include acquisition dates. Accuracy | All 3” orthoimagery deliverables will meet or exceed ASPRS Class I Accuracy Standards. Pre-Delivery Inspection | Our pre-delivery inspectors perform final quality control before materials are submitted to the City of Bozeman. This includes verifying correct naming convention, file formatting, correct labeling of delivery media, and packing list accuracy. 233 11 | P a g e d. Scope of Project We understand the scope of the City of Bozeman project entails control and quality check shot surveying, digital aerial imagery acquisition, data processing and orthoimagery production services, building footprints, quality control, metadata, and reporting for approximately 78.7 square miles covering the greater Bozeman area. The desired flight dates are between April 1st and April 30th, 2023. The desired project completion date is 90 days from photo acquisition. Deliverables/specifications include the following: Item Description Format Projection, Datum, Units UTM Zone 12, NAD83 (2011), Meters MT State Plane, NAD83 (2011), Meters NAVD88, Meters Flight Plan and Logs Flight lines, exposures, photo centers Feature Class Calibration Reports Digital camera (UCE) PDF Survey Control Report AGPS data, XYZ OPK, ground control XLS Aerial Triangulation Report Adjustment process, coordinate list PDF or XLS Sample Imagery Prior to undertaking full digital orthophoto production, Aero-Graphics will furnish the City with sample digital images to evaluate and accept as examples of overall image quality. TIF Digital Orthoimagery 4-band (RGB and NIR), 3” pixel Mosaic at 1-foot (or 0.5-foot) pixel resolution TIF, SID Breaklines Breaklines used to correct bridge and overpass distortion Feature Class Building Footprints Extracted polygons (updated from 2021 dataset) Feature Class Progress Reports Weekly status emails PDF Metadata FGDC-compliant metadata for all data. XML Project Report Summary of processes, collection, accuracy results, etc. PDF 234 12 | P a g e e. Related Experience with Projects Similar to the Scope of Services The following aerial acquisition and processing projects have been successfully completed by Aero- Graphics’ production staff within the last three years: Since 2009, Aero-Graphics has acquired and orthorectified nearly 5,000 square miles of imagery covering Sublette County to support GIS, public works, and other needs throughout the county. Aero-Graphics has completed acquisition and is currently processing orthoimagery for 2022. Services and Project Deliverables included: • Target placement and GPS surveying for thirty-four (34) control points. • Digital 4-band aerial photography acquisition at 6” GSD. • RGB and CIR orthorectified imagery in TIFF and MrSID formats at 6’’ pixel size. • Overall mosaics at 6” pixel size. Client: Sublette County, Wyoming Contact: Rich Greenwood, Greenwood Mapping Address: 9600 Wenzel Lane, Wilson, WY 83014 Phone: 307.200.9563 Project Name: Sublette County Orthoimagery Completion: July 2009-2022 Total Area: 4,927 mi2 Pixel Resolution: 6” GSD Key Personnel Brad Marz Kelly Francis Sam Hoddenbach Karl Jensen Kevin Reid Joe Belliston 235 13 | P a g e The purpose of this project was to obtain turnkey digital geo-referenced orthophotography for the City of Sheridan. The imagery will be utilized in ongoing GIS projects for the City of Sheridan. Furthermore, it will aid in a project to create an updated geo-referenced map of the Sheridan Area Water Supply’s (SAWS) active underground waterlines. Services and Project Deliverables included: • Digital 4-band aerial photography acquisition at a 15cm GSD. • Digital orthorectified imagery at a 6” pixel size delivered in GeoTIFF format. • Project-wide mosaic in MrSID format. • Project Metadata including a comprehensive Technical Project Report detailing acquisition, processing, and accuracy assessment processes. Client: City of Sheridan, Wyoming Project Name: 2019 GIS DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT Contact: Brian Craig, Community Development Director Email Address: bcraig@sheridanwy.net Phone: 307.675.4248 Address: 55 Grinnell Plaza, Sheridan, WY 82801 Completion: July 2019 Total Area: 77.3 mi2 Key Personnel Kelly Francis Bernie Doud Emilio Sanchez Karl Jensen Kevin Reid Joe Belliston 236 14 | P a g e For eight years running (2012 – 2019), Aero-Graphics has acquired and orthorectified 50 square miles of imagery covering the City of Ontario to support GIS, public works, and other needs throughout the city. Acquisition is always performed in the winter during leaf- off. Spatial resolutions are as follows: 2012 – 6” GSD; 2013 – 3” GSD; 2014-2019 – 2” GSD. Services and Project Deliverables included: • Target placement and GPS surveying for seven (7) control points. • Digital 4-band aerial photography acquisition at varying GSDs, based on acquisition year (see above). • RGB orthorectified imagery in GeoTIFF format at varying GSDs, tiled according to USGS DOQQQ scheme, delivered in California State Plane Zone 5, US Feet. • Overall ECW and MrSID mosaics • FGDC-compliant metadata for each ortho tile and mosaic. Client: City of Ontario, California Contact: Robert De Casas, Senior System Analyst Address: 303 East B Street, Ontario, CA 91764 Phone: 909.395.2408 Project Name: Ontario Orthoimagery Updates Completion: March 2012-2019 Total Area: 50.1 mi2 Pixel Resolution: 2”; 3”; 6” GSD Key Personnel Bernie Doud Mason Decker Emilio Sanchez Karl Jensen Kevin Reid Joe Belliston 237 15 | P a g e The City of Missoula GIS Services (GIS Svc) in partnership with the Missoula Redevelopment Agency (MRA) contracted with Aero-Graphics in the spring of 2020 to gather aerial photography and provide orthophotographic data. Prior to the contract, City staff relied on a low-resolution data service from ESRI and aerial photography gathered from a flight performed in 2014. A new flight was required to document the significant growth recently experienced by Missoula. The resulting imagery was flown at an increased resolution that captured feature details whose needs had been subsequently identified since 2014. Services and Project Deliverables included: • Ground control survey. • Digital 4-band aerial photography acquisition at a 7.5cm GSD. • Digital orthorectified imagery at a 3” pixel size delivered in TIFF and ECW formats. • Project-wide mosaic at a 6” pixel size in MrSID format. • Project Metadata including a comprehensive Technical Project Report detailing acquisition, processing, and accuracy assessment processes. Client: City of Missoula, MT Project Name: 2020 Missoula-Area Orthophotography Contact: Eric Anderson, GIS Analyst Email Address: AndersenE@ci.missoula.mt.us Phone: 406.552.6101 Address: 435 Ryman St., Missoula, MT 59802 Completion: July 2020 Total Area: 77.3 mi2 Key Personnel Kelly Francis Mason Decker Emilio Sanchez Karl Jensen Kevin Reid Joe Belliston 238 16 | P a g e Nez Perce County Idaho; Asotin County, Washington; City of Lewiston, Idaho; City of Clarkston, Washington; Asotin PUD, Washington; Port of Lewiston, Idaho; Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District, Idaho; and the LC Valley MPO hired Aero-Graphics to photograph approximately 87.4 square miles of the Cities of Lewiston, Idaho and Clarkston, Washington and surrounding vicinity with a pixel resolution of 3 inch. Services and Project Deliverables included: • Digital 4-band aerial photography acquisition at a 3” GSD. • RGB orthorectified imagery in GeoTIFF and SID formats, tiled according to client- provided tiling scheme, delivered in Idaho and Washington State Plane Zones, US Feet. • Overall image mosaic at a 3” pixel size in SID format. • FGDC-compliant metadata for each ortho tile and mosaic. Key Personnel Bernie Doud Mason Decker Emilio Sanchez Karl Jensen Kevin Reid Joe Belliston Client: Nez Perce County, Idaho Contact: Bill Reynolds, GIS Coordinator Address: 1230 Main St., Lewiston, ID 83501 Phone: 208.750.2055 Project Name: ID/WA 2020 Aerial Photography Project Completion: October 2020 Total Area: 87.4 mi2 Pixel Resolution: 3” GSD 239 17 | P a g e f. Statement of Qualifications Aero-Graphics is a full-service aerial mapping company with one (1) Project Management Professional, two (2) in-house Professional Land Surveyors, seven (7) in-house Certified Photogrammetrists and two (2) GISCI Certified GIS Professionals (GISP). We also employ fifteen (15) flight staff, including logistics managers, mission planning managers, pilots, and sensor operators. We have over 55 years of aerial mapping experience and 25 years of digital orthophoto compilation experience including a working relationship with the City of Bozeman in 2018 and 2021. Aero-Graphics’ project management team offers 100 years of combined experience and takes a methodical, deliberate approach to managing complex projects that includes risk mitigation, quality assurance and control, and dynamic scheduling. We own and operate the best and latest equipment for aerial mapping. Our Vexcel UltraCam Eagle digital camera system provides unsurpassed data accuracy and quality. Aero-Graphics is ISO 9001:2015 certified, and fully recertified on March 7, 2022. We are pleased to strengthen our contribution of quality geospatial services through this certification, which, among important audits, includes process accountability, continuous documented improvement on those processes, and procedural document control. This lends increased confidence in reliable results. The full certificate is available for viewing upon request. Aero-Graphics’ proven project management strategy produces accurate, timely deliverables in a cost-effective manner. This strategy includes the following key elements: • Clearly defined objectives • Appropriate risk management • Intelligent mission planning • Adherence to project milestones • Effective QA/QC • Constant communication These time-tested standard operating procedures (SOP) have created a long tradition of exceeding clients’ expectations and we are confident they will ensure the long-term success of City of Bozeman projects. g. References Organization Name Position Email Phone Number City of Missoula, MT Eric Andersen GIS Analyst AndersenE@ci.missoula.mt.us 406.552.6101 City of Sheridan, WY Brian Craig Community Dev. Director bcraig@sheridanwy.net 307.675.4248 Nez Perce County, ID Bill Reynolds GIS Coordinator billreynolds@co.nezperce.id.us 208.750.2055 240 18 | P a g e h. Present and Projected Workloads The Aero-Graphics Team possesses the capacity, expertise, and resources to easily meet the City’s desired project completion date of 90 days from photo acquisition. Our approach involves resource allocation such that parallel processing, rather than sequential processing, is the norm. We regularly manage multiple concurrent projects, with and without subcontractors, with varying degrees of complexity. Workloads and budgets are closely monitored daily to ensure that schedules never slip. All staff members are cross trained to perform multiple production tasks; this allows us the flexibility to ramp up capacity in certain departments when needed. Our present workload for our Orthoimagery Department (pictured below) includes a total of 12 (12) projects currently in progress, most of which are projected to complete by April 2023. Between the months of April and July, we currently have one (1) ortho projects scheduled. Aero-Graphics will surely have sufficient capacity, staff, and resources to meet the scheduling demands of this contract. Figure 1: Aero-Graphics’ current ortho project listing as of Oct. 2022 Figure 2: Proposed schedule for the City of Bozeman project Contract Item Completion By Control Survey March 31, 2023 Aerial Imagery Acquisition April 30, 2023 Orthoimagery Production June 30, 2023 Building Footprints June 30, 2023 Final Project Report & Metadata June 30, 2023 241 19 | P a g e i. Key Personnel Aero-Graphics prides itself on employing the most intelligent and skilled professionals in the geospatial industry. The team members listed below will supervise acquisition and production tasks and ensure that quality standards are met for the City of Bozeman project. A Team Member Summary Table is included below followed by personalized resumes of each key personnel. Team Member Summary Table Name Project Role Years of Experience (w/Firm) Education (Year Completed) Certifications/ Licenses (Year Received) Kelly Francis Executive Oversight 25 (25) B.S. (1995) CP (2008) PMP (2014) Mason Decker Cost Estimation & Project Oversight 8 (7) B.S. (2014) GIS Cert (2012) CP (forthcoming) Bailey Costello Project Management & Scheduling 3(1) B.S. (2019) M.S. (2022) Bernie Doud QA/QC Implementation, GIS Database Creation 18 (12) B.S. (2004) MBA (2008) CP (2010) GISP (2013) Tom Stark (RPA) Ground Control Surveying 27 (20) B.S. (1990) A.S. (1995) MT PLS CFedS #1175 Sam Hoddenbach Flight Planning, Flight Crew Oversight 6 (6) B.S. (2016) Jim Hoddenbach Aircraft Operation, Pilot Oversight 34 (4) Karl Jensen ABGPS/IMU Data Processing 20 (20) B.A. (1998) A.S. (2009) CP (2008) UT PLS (2013) Kevin Reid Photogrammetry Lead 21 (13) CP (2013) Joe Belliston Orthoimagery Processing 12 (12) B.S. (2007) PT (2013) 242 20 | P a g e Kelly Francis, CP, PMP | President Role. Kelly Francis will apply his 25 years (all with AG) of expertise and executive oversight to this project. Education and Certifications. Kelly holds a Bachelor of Science in Marketing from Utah State University. He is an ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist (#R1372) and a Project Management Professional (#1742748). Kelly currently serves on the Board of Directors for MAPPS, national association of firms in the surveying, spatial data and geographic information systems field. Experience. Mr. Francis is an owner of Aero-Graphics and serves as its President and Senior Project Manager. He has dedicated his career to geospatial process efficiency and business strategy. As such, he is intimately familiar with planning, design, and execution of LiDAR and digital aerial photography projects to support topo mapping production. Bailey Costello | Project Manager Role. Bailey Costello will apply his 3 years of expertise and oversight to this project, including project management, imagery acquisition/processing design, supervision, and progress status reporting. Education and Certifications. Bailey holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Science from the University of Virginia and a Master of Science degree in Geography from the University of Utah. Experience. Mr. Costello has worked with such entities as Bowen Collins & Associates, Dominion Engineering, J-U-B Engineers, Salt Lake City Corp, and Perigee Consulting to design and complete digital photography acquisition, color orthorectified imagery projects, LiDAR acquisition and processing projects, volume calculations, and contour and DTM mapping. Mason Decker | Project Manager Role. Mason Decker will apply his 8 years of expertise and oversight to this project, including project management, imagery acquisition/processing design, supervision, and progress status reporting. Education and Certifications. Mason holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Geography from the University of Utah and a GIS Certificate from Salt Lake Community College. Experience. Mr. Decker has worked with such entities as San Bernardino County, Orange County, City of Bakersfield, Kern County COG, City of Lubbock, TX, Nez Perce County, ID, and City of Logan, UT to design and complete digital photography acquisition, color orthorectified imagery projects, LiDAR acquisition and processing projects, recurring survey and photogrammetry updates, volume calculations, and contour and DTM mapping. 243 21 | P a g e Bernie Doud, CP, GISP | Quality Manager Role. Bernie Doud will apply his 18 years of expertise and oversight to this project, including implementation of quality programs, audits, and procedures, project management, and employee mentoring. Education and Certifications. Bernie holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Geographic Information Systems and a Master of Business Administration degree. He is a Certified Photogrammetrist with ASPRS (#1449) and a GISCI Certified GISP (#52260). Experience. Mr. Doud is a senior level technical and quality manager. He has a solid technical background in GIS and all aspects of LiDAR and photogrammetry, which along with his project management expertise has strengthened his ability to design, implement, and monitor QA/QC programs customized to each project, train and direct employees in project execution, and act as technical client liaison. Tom Stark, PLS, CFedS | Survey Manager (RPA) Role. Tom Stark is RPA’s Survey Group Manager and Primary Contact in Helena. He has over 27 years of experience in OPUS Projects; GPS RTK and static networks. He has successfully managed the execution of numerous surveying projects throughout the United States. Education and Licenses. Tom holds an Associate of Applied Science degree in Land Surveying and a Bachelor of Science in Business Finance. He is a registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Montana (#12249) and a Certified Federal Surveyor (#1175). Experience. In his role as Survey Manager, Tom ensures impeccable accuracy in ground survey control. This is critical to ensuring high-quality LiDAR and mapping services. Tom was on the ground and collected survey data for the Boulder River Valley Wells Project which involved surveying for 85 well casings. Sam Hoddenbach | Flight Ops Manager Role. Mrs. Hoddenbach will dedicate her 6 years of flight planning, airspace coordination, and overall Flight Department management skills to this project. Education and Certifications. Sam completed undergraduate studies. Experience. As Flight Manager at Aero-Graphics, Sam manages administrative functions within the flight department and assists Project Managers and the Flight Coordinator with flight-related questions and planning. She has direct operation experience with various aerial sensors, including the Optech Galaxy LiDAR sensor and the UltraCam Eagle digital camera. 244 22 | P a g e Jim Hoddenbach | Chief Pilot Role. Mr. Hoddenbach will serve as the Cessna 310 pilot-in-command during the data acquisition phase. Education and Certifications. Jim is an A&P IA Mechanic with over 31 years of experience and has provided decades of dependable, professional, and quality work through Aero Services to his fellow aviators at the Skypark Airport in Woods Cross, UT. Jim is a Certified Flight Instructor, Multi Engine Instructor, fixed wing and rotorcraft pilot. Experience. As Chief Pilot, Mr. Hoddenbach is pilot-in-command for flight execution of mapping projects in the company’s Cessna T310R, Cessna T206, and Piper PA-23 Aztec aircraft. He has experience operating RC-30 film and UltraCam Eagle large format cameras along with the accompanying computer flight management systems and inertial measurement units. He is trained in the use of the POSTrack software that is utilized in conjunction with these cameras and systems. Karl Jensen, CP, PLS | Airborne Processing Lead Role. Karl Jensen will apply his 16 years of expertise, production capacity, and oversight to this project, including, ground control planning, ABGPS/IMU processing and analytical aerotriangulation. Education and Licenses. Karl holds an Associate of Applied Science degree in Surveying from Salt Lake Community College and a Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Utah. He is a registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Utah (#7643406) and a Certified Photogrammetrist with ASPRS (#1374). Experience. Mr. Jensen is a senior level technical and production manager with a concrete CADD, survey, and photogrammetry background. He has successfully coordinated production tasks for numerous orthoimagery, LiDAR, surveying, and photogrammetric mapping projects. Kevin Reid, CP | Photogrammetry Lead Role. Kevin Reid will apply his 21 years of expertise, production capacity, training, and oversight to this project by performing project preparation functions, hydro break line compilation oversight and management, quality control, and progress reporting. Education and Certifications. Kevin studied Computer Science in college and is an ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist (#1557). Experience. Over the course of nine years, Mr. Reid has overseen photogrammetric mapping projects of varying complexity, from 40-scale transportation projects to 200- scale mining projects. He is well-versed in the effective utilization of VR and Inpho photogrammetric software suites. 245 23 | P a g e Joe Belliston, CPT | Lead Orthocompiler Role. In his role as Lead Orthocompiler, Mr. Belliston is responsible for orthophoto quality control, specification compliance and meeting demanding schedule commitments. Education. Joe holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Utah in Geography and recently received his ASPRS Certified Photogrammetric Technologist certification. Experience. Mr. Belliston has over ten (10) years of ortho production, GIS, editing, and AT experience. He has successfully coordinated production tasks for numerous large image orthorectification projects and has extensive training in Inpho and ESRI mapping software suites. Mr. Belliston has effectively managed numerous projects of various sizes involving digitally orthorectified imagery yielding high levels of client satisfaction. 246 24 | P a g e j. Additional Information Quality Delivery System (QDS) | QA/QC is built into each one of our processes, from planning and design to production. Our QDS, customized for the City of Bozeman project, organizes, and lists specific, measurable QA/QC steps for each process and assigns personal responsibility to ensure each is performed with exactness. Quality Assurance is separated from Quality Control to make our system comprehensive. QA denotes a preventive step or design that is performed before the associated process to avoid mistakes. QC is a task that takes place after the associated process and aims to find and rectify mistakes that do slip through. 247 25 | P a g e k. Affirmation of Nondiscrimination & Equal Pay NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL PAY AFFIRMATION Aero-Graphics, Inc. hereby affirms it will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, age, marital status, national origin, or because of actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or disability and acknowledges and understands the eventual contract will contain a provision prohibiting discrimination as described above and this prohibition on discrimination shall apply to the hiring and treatments or proposer’s employees and to all subcontracts. In addition, Aero-Graphics, Inc. hereby affirms it will abide by the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3- 104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act), and has visited the State of Montana Equal Pay for Equal Work “best practices” website, https://equalpay.mt.gov/BestPractices/Employers, or equivalent “best practices publication and has read the material. Bailey Costello, Project Manager Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of submitter 248 26 | P a g e l. Pricing Survey Control and Quality Check Shots .................................................................. $10,600. Digital Imagery Acquisition ....................................................................................... $15,010. Building Footprints ..................................................................................................... $6,520. Digital Orthoimagery (7.5cm pixels with 15cm Mosaic) ............................................ $8,200. Project Report and Metadata ..................................................................................... $2,880. Total Project ............... $43,210. Pricing is valid for 90 days. Terms are Net 30 days with monthly invoices submitted for completed work. 249 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM: Luke Kline, Parks and Recreation Contracts Coordinator Mitch Overton, Parks and Recreation Department Director SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. for Landscape Maintenance Services in the Parks and Trails District MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. for Landscape Maintenance Services in the Parks and Trails District. STRATEGIC PLAN:6.5 Parks, Trails & Open Space: Support the maintenance and expansion of an interconnected system of parks, trails and open spaces. BACKGROUND:On June 1, 2020, the Bozeman City Commission approved Resolution 5180 creating the Bozeman Parks and Trails Special District (District). To accomplish the District objectives the City has developed a multi-year District implementation plan designed to achieve steady calculated increases in level of service standards and sustainable maintenance practices in all City Parks. Beginning July 1, 2020 City’s Parks and Recreation Department assumed full responsibility for all of the District’s designated park properties including the addition of 235 acres of park land located within subdivision parks previously maintained by home owners/community associations. In February 2021, the Parks and Recreation Department conducted a request for proposals process to acquire professional services required to maintain parks grounds and landscape areas in the District. After careful evaluation and review, Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. was determined to be the most qualified vendor for Parks and Trails District Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 Parks. On April 6, 2021, the City entered into the Agreement with Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. The Agreement is effective for one year after the date of execution with the option to extend the agreement an additional year 250 upon mutual agreement. Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. has demonstrated the ability to provide comprehensive landscape maintenance services for the City’s Parks and Trials District and will continue complete services as defined and described in Attachment B: PSA Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. The Attachment A PSA Amendment 2 Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. will extend the Agreement for an additional one (1) year period and shall terminate on April 6, 2024. In no case, however, may this agreement run longer than five (5) years from the original effective date. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES: As recommended by City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:Funding is currently allocated for this maintenance within the FY23 and FY24 budget in the Parks and Trails District Maintenance Fund account. Attachments: Attachment A PSA Amendment 2 Advantage Spraying Services, Inc..pdf Attachment B PSA Advantage Spraying Services, Inc..pdf Report compiled on: February 8, 2023 251 Second Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2023 – FY 2024 Page 1 of 2 SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR Parks and Trials District Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 dated April 6, 2021 (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 2023, by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and Advantage Spraying Services, Inc., 144 Wildcat Way, Bozeman, MT 59718 hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1.Section 31 of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety with the following: 31.Extensions: This Agreement may, upon mutual agreement, be extended for a period of one (1) year by written agreement of the Parties. In no case, however, may this Agreement run longer than five years. 2.Extension of Term: Section 31. Extensions: Professional Service Agreement between City and Contractor dated April 6, 2021 is extended for an additional one (1) year period. The Agreement shall terminate on April 6, 2024. 3.Section 4 Payment: The landscape maintenance services specified in Exhibit B of the Professional Services Agreement between the City and the Contractor are clarified to include updated pricing described in Exhibit A: Schedule of Services - Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. 2023 Pricing. 4.Agreement still valid. All remaining terms and provisions of the Agreement remain valid. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** 252 Second Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2023 – FY 2024 Page 2 of 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument the day and year first above written. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA ADVANTAGE SPRAYING SERVICES, INC. By________________________________ By_____________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Print Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 253 Schedule of Services - Advantage Spraying Services, Inc. 2023 Pricing City Of Bozeman Parks and Trails District Landscape Maintenance Zone 1 Account 2023 Pricing Per Mow & Trim Ferguson Meadows $90.00 Valley Commons $60.00 Loyal Gardens $435.00 Valley West $510.00 Norton Ranch Parks $690.00 Baxter Meadows Master $1,050.00 Baxter Meadows Phase 1 $300.00 Flanders Creek $570.00 Traditions $375.00 Diamond Estates $60.00 Oak Springs $1,050.00 Diamond Park $1,050.00 Four Points $645.00 Westbrook $300.00 The Lakes $300.00 Sundance $330.00 Boulder Creek $360.00 Annie St Park $90.00 Cottage Park $60.00 Flanders Mill $165.00 Alder Creek $630.00 Gran Cielo $510.00 Lawn Spraying & Fertilization Prices Are Staying The Same As The Last Two Seasons (see Advantage PSA Exhibit B ) Trail Spraying Prices Are Staying The Same As The Last Two Seasons (see Advantage PSA Exhibit B ) Pruning, Spring Cleanup, & Debris Removal Prices Staying The Same As The Last Two Seasons (see Advantage PSA Exhibit B ) Doggie Pot Pricing Staying The Same As Last Season - $50.00 per station per month. Exhibit A: 254 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 1 of 11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 6th day of April, 2021, by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and, Advantage Spraying Services Inc., 144 Wildcat Way, Bozeman MT 59718,hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” The City and Contractor may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose: City agrees to enter this Agreement with Contractor to perform for City services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. Term/Effective Date: This Agreement is effective upon the Effective Date unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement. 3. Scope of Services: Contractor will perform the work and provide the services in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services. For conflicts between this Agreement and the Scope of Services, unless specifically provided otherwise, the Agreement governs. 4. Payment: City agrees to pay Contractor specified in the Appendix C Maintenance Schedule Zone 1 (LANDSCAPE) attached hereto as Exhibit B. Any alteration or deviation from the described services that involves additional costs above the Agreement amount will be performed by Contractor after written request by the City, and will become an additional charge over and above the amount listed in the Scope of Services. The City must agree in writing upon any additional charges. 5. Contractor’s Representations: To induce City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor makes the following representations: a. Contractor has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of this Agreement, the DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 255 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 2 of 11 Scope of Services, and with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress or performance of the Scope of Services. b. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has the experience and ability to perform the services required by this Agreement; that it will perform the services in a professional, competent and timely manner and with diligence and skill; that it has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement and grant the rights granted in it; and that its performance of this Agreement shall not infringe upon or violate the rights of any third party, whether rights of copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, libel, slander or any other rights of any nature whatsoever, or violate any federal, state and municipal laws. The City will not determine or exercise control as to general procedures or formats necessary to have these services meet this warranty. 6. Independent Contractor Status/Labor Relations: The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this Agreement and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies handbook and may not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 39, Chapter 71, Montana Code Annotated (MCA), and the Occupational Disease Act of Montana, Title 39, Chapter 71, MCA. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all members and employees of Contractor’s business, except for those members who are exempted by law. Contractor shall furnish the City with copies showing one of the following: (1) a binder for workers’ compensation coverage by an insurer licensed and authorized to provide workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Montana; or (2) proof of exemption from workers’ compensation granted by law for independent contractors. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement, any labor problems or disputes of any type arise or materialize which in turn cause any services to cease for any period of time, Contractor specifically agrees to take immediate steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. Contractor shall provide immediate relief to the City so as to permit the services to continue at no additional cost to City. DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 256 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 3 of 11 Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and liabilities arising out of, resulting from, or occurring in connection with any labor problems or disputes or any delays or stoppages of work associated with such problems or disputes. 7. Indemnity/Waiver of Claims/Insurance: For other than professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and officers (collectively referred to for purposes of this Section as the City) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, fees and costs (including attorney’s fees and the costs and fees of expert witness and consultants), losses, expenses, liabilities (including liability where activity is inherently or intrinsically dangerous) or damages of whatever kind or nature connected therewith and without limit and without regard to the cause or causes thereof or the negligence of any party or parties that may be asserted against, recovered from or suffered by the City occasioned by, growing or arising out of or resulting from or in any way related to: (i) the negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of the Contractor; or (ii) any negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of any of the Contractor’s agents. For the professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless against claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses, including reasonable defense attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Contractor or Contractor’s agents or employees. Such obligations shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist. The indemnification obligations of this Section must not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any common-law or statutory rights of the City as indemnitee(s) which would otherwise exist as to such indemnitee(s). Contractor’s indemnity under this Section shall be without regard to and without any right to contribution from any insurance maintained by City. Should the City be required to bring an action against the Contractor to assert its right to defense or indemnification under this Agreement or under the Contractor’s applicable insurance policies required below, the City shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in asserting its right to indemnification or defense but only if a court of competent jurisdiction determines the Contractor was obligated to defend the claim(s) or was obligated to indemnify the City for a claim(s) or any portion(s) thereof. In the event of an action filed against the City resulting from the City’s performance under DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 257 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 4 of 11 this Agreement, the City may elect to represent itself and incur all costs and expenses of suit. Contractor also waives any and all claims and recourse against the City, including the right of contribution for loss or damage to person or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to the performance of this Agreement except “responsibility for [City’s] own fraud, for willful injury to the person or property of another, or for violation of law, whether willful or negligent” as per 28-2-702, MCA. These obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement and the services performed hereunder. In addition to and independent from the above, Contractor shall at Contractor’s expense secure insurance coverage through an insurance company or companies duly licensed and authorized to conduct insurance business in Montana which insures the liabilities and obligations specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance coverage shall not contain any exclusion for liabilities specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance shall cover and apply to all claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses that may be asserted or claimed against, recovered from, or suffered by the City without limit and without regard to the cause therefore and which is acceptable to the City. Contractor shall furnish to the City an accompanying certificate of insurance and accompanying endorsements in amounts not less than as follows: Workers’ Compensation – statutory; Employers’ Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; Commercial General Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 property damage/bodily injury per accident; and Professional Liability - $1,000,000 per claim; $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The above amounts shall be exclusive of defense costs. The City shall be endorsed as an additional or named insured on a primary non-contributory basis on both the Commercial General and Automobile Liability policies. The insurance and required endorsements must be in a form suitable to City and shall include no less than a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Contractor shall notify City within two (2) business days of Contractor’s receipt of notice that any required insurance coverage will be terminated or Contractor’s decision to terminate any required insurance coverage for any reason. DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 258 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 5 of 11 The City must approve all insurance coverage and endorsements prior to the Contractor commencing work. 8. Termination for Contractor’s Fault: a. If Contractor refuses or fails to timely do the work, or any part thereof, or fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, or otherwise breaches any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City may, by written notice, terminate this Agreement and the Contractor’s right to proceed with all or any part of the work (“Termination Notice Due to Contractor’s Fault”). The City may then take over the work and complete it, either with its own resources or by re-letting the contract to any other third party. b. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 8, Contractor shall be entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered. c. Any termination provided for by this Section 8 shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled under the law or at equity. d. In the event of termination under this Section 8, Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 9. Termination for City’s Convenience: a. Should conditions arise which, in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, make it advisable to the City to cease performance under this Agreement, the City may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Contractor (“Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience”). The termination shall be effective in the manner specified in the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience and shall be without prejudice to any claims that the City may otherwise have against Contractor. b. Upon receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, unless otherwise directed in the Notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease performance under this Agreement and make every reasonable effort to refrain from continuing work, incurring additional expenses or costs under this Agreement and shall immediately cancel all existing orders or contracts upon terms satisfactory to the City. Contractor shall do only such work as may be necessary to preserve, protect, and maintain work already completed or immediately DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 259 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 6 of 11 in progress. c. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 9, Contractor is entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered on or before the receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience. d. The compensation described in Section 9(c) is the sole compensation due to Contractor for its performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 10. Limitation on Contractor’s Damages; Time for Asserting Claim: a. In the event of a claim for damages by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor’s damages shall be limited to contract damages and Contractor hereby expressly waives any right to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature or kind. b. In the event Contractor wants to assert a claim for damages of any kind or nature, Contractor shall provide City with written notice of its claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding and giving rise to the claim, and the total amount of damages sought by the claim, within thirty (30) days of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the claim. In the event Contractor fails to provide such notice, Contractor shall waive all rights to assert such claim. 11. Representatives and Notices: a. City’s Representative: The City’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Luke Kline, Contracts Coordinator or such other individual as City shall designate in writing. Whenever approval or authorization from or communication or submission to City is required by this Agreement, such communication or submission shall be directed to the City’s Representative and approvals or authorizations shall be issued only by such Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when City’s Representative is not available, Contractor may direct its communication or submission to other designated City personnel or agents as designated by the City in writing and may receive approvals or authorization from such persons. DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 260 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 7 of 11 b. Contractor’s Representative: The Contractor’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Patrick Doran or such other individual as Contractor shall designate in writing. Whenever direction to or communication with Contractor is required by this Agreement, such direction or communication shall be directed to Contractor’s Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when Contractor’s Representative is not available, City may direct its direction or communication to other designated Contractor personnel or agents. c. Notices: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided to the Representatives named in this Section. Notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered by courier to Party’s address shown above during normal business hours of the recipient; or when sent, if sent by email or fax (with a successful transmission report) to the email address or fax number provided by the Party’s Representative; or on the fifth business day following mailing, if mailed by ordinary mail to the address shown above, postage prepaid. 12. Permits: Contractor shall provide all notices, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, including a City of Bozeman business license, and inspections from applicable governmental authorities, and pay all fees and charges in connection therewith. 13 Laws and Regulations: Contractor shall comply fully with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and municipal ordinances including, but not limited to, all workers’ compensation laws, all environmental laws including, but not limited to, the generation and disposal of hazardous waste, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), the safety rules, codes, and provisions of the Montana Safety Act in Title 50, Chapter 71, MCA, all applicable City, County, and State building and electrical codes, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all non-discrimination, affirmative action, and utilization of minority and small business statutes and regulations. 14. Nondiscrimination and Equal Pay: The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 261 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 8 of 11 require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 15. Intoxicants; DOT Drug and Alcohol Regulations/Safety and Training: Contractor shall not permit or suffer the introduction or use of any intoxicants, including alcohol or illegal drugs, by any employee or agent engaged in services to the City under this Agreement while on City property or in the performance of any activities under this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges it is aware of and shall comply with its responsibilities and obligations under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations governing anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention plans and related testing. City shall have the right to request proof of such compliance and Contractor shall be obligated to furnish such proof. The Contractor shall be responsible for instructing and training the Contractor's employees and agents in proper and specified work methods and procedures. The Contractor shall provide continuous inspection and supervision of the work performed. The Contractor is responsible for instructing its employees and agents in safe work practices. 16. Modification and Assignability: This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except by written agreement signed by both parties hereto. The Contractor may not subcontract or assign Contractor’s rights, including the right to compensation or duties arising hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Any subcontractor or assignee will be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 17. Reports/Accountability/Public Information: Contractor agrees to develop and/or provide documentation as requested by the City demonstrating Contractor’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Contractor shall allow the City, its auditors, and other persons authorized by the City to inspect and copy its books and records for the purpose of verifying that the reimbursement of monies distributed to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement was used in DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 262 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 9 of 11 compliance with this Agreement and all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. The Contractor shall not issue any statements, releases or information for public dissemination without prior approval of the City. 18. Non-Waiver: A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of any terms or conditions of this Agreement does not limit the other party’s right to enforce such term or conditions or to pursue any available legal or equitable rights in the event of any subsequent default or breach. 19. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In the event it becomes necessary for either Party to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party or the Party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including the City Attorney’s Office staff. 20. Taxes: Contractor is obligated to pay all taxes of any kind or nature and make all appropriate employee withholdings. 21. Dispute Resolution: a. Any claim, controversy, or dispute between the parties, their agents, employees, or representatives shall be resolved first by negotiation between senior-level personnel from each party duly authorized to execute settlement agreements. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the parties may invite an independent, disinterested mediator to assist in the negotiated settlement discussions. b. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the dispute was first raised, then such dispute may only be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in compliance with the Applicable Law provisions of this Agreement. 22. Survival: Contractor’s indemnification shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for the maximum period allowed under applicable law. 23. Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not be construed as a part of the Agreement or as a limitation on the scope of the particular paragraphs to which they refer. 24. Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 263 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 10 of 11 balance thereof shall continue in effect. 25. Applicable Law: The parties agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. 26. Binding Effect: This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. 27. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties, does not constitute a third-party beneficiary agreement, and may not be relied upon or enforced by a third party. 28. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together constitute one instrument. 29. Integration: This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement of the parties. Covenants or representations not contained herein or made a part thereof by reference, are not binding upon the parties. There are no understandings between the parties other than as set forth in this Agreement. All communications, either verbal or written, made prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby abrogated and withdrawn unless specifically made a part of this Agreement by reference. 30. Consent to Electronic Signatures: The Parties have consented to execute this Agreement electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. 31. Extensions: this Agreement may, upon mutual agreement, be extended for a period of one year by written agreement of the Parties. In no case, however, may this Agreement run longer than three years. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 264 Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services Zone 1 FY 2021 Page 11 of 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written or as recorded in an electronic signature. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA ____________________________________ CONTRACTOR (Type Name Above) By________________________________ By__________________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Print Name: ___________________________ Print Title: ____________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E Patrick Doran Advantage Spraying Services, Inc Vice-President 265 City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 February 2021 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PARKS & TRAILS DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES ZONE: 1 City of Bozeman Bozeman, MT Exhibit A DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 266 Page 5 of 25 scheduled services to ensure that City landscapes are effectively and efficiently maintained for the benefit of the city and its residents. The selected contractor will begin work in April of 2021 and continue services through the completion of the summer season at the end of October 2021. The routine services will be conducted for approximately a 30 week period in total or approximately 7 months per year. III.SCOPE OF SERVICES If selected a contractor will provide the City with professional expertise to successfully implement the proposed scope of services. The City has provided a summary of the basic maintenance components and site locations to assist in understanding the tasks and maintenance services desired. Specifications are general in nature and not intended to encompass all the projects complexity. Contractor shall become familiar with the specified locations and the needs of each facility to best determine their ability to complete the described maintenance specifications. Additional tasks and work elements may be inserted into the scope of services during contract negotiations with the selected firm. It is also possible that tasks or elements could be removed during negotiations or not included in an initial contract because of regulatory uncertainty, budget limitations, contracting strategy or any combination thereof. Proposals must clearly identify any elements of the proposed scope of services that would not be provided by the prime contractor. Any sub-contractors which comprise the respondent team must be identified along with a description of past working history between the firms. The scope of services includes: 1.Contractor shall be responsible for completion of site specific landscape maintenance and grounds keeping services identified and described in Appendix D: Park location Maps Zone 1. 2.Contractor proposals shall include cost associated with delivery of tasks described in Appendix C: Maintenance Schedule Zone 1 and Additional Services listed to be considered for proposal award. 3.Contractor shall provide a fixed cost per item for all services at the frequency designated/described in Appendix C: Maintenance Schedule Zone 1. Services requested for Maintenance Schedule Zone 1 include: a.Mowing b.Weedeating / Trimming c.Fertilizer Application d.Spraying Application / Weed Control e.Dog Station Maintenance f.Garbage / Trash Removal Exhibit A DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 267 Page 6 of 25 4.Contractor shall provide a fixed hourly rate for services described in Appendix C: Maintenance Schedule. Additional Services requested include: g.Mowing h.Weedeating / Trimming i.Dog station maintenance j.Landscaping k.Clearing, brushing, pruning of vegetation l.Maintenance of native grass/naturalized areas m.Trail maintenance n.Removal of seasonal debris, leaves, litter o.Overseeding turf areas p.Garbage trash/removal q.Aerating & Thatching 5.The final scope of services may change and will be contained in a professional services agreement to be executed by the City and the selected Contractor. Contractor proposals shall include additional explanation if items costs are excluded from the scope of services provided. Irrigation services/maintenance are not included in this RFP and will be contracted separately. Exhibit A DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 268 PARK NAME SITE DISCRIPTION LOCATION: MAP/LOCATION (GREEN AREA ONLY) FERGUSON MEADOWS PARK TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/SMALL/FAIR Sanders Ave & Cascade St. 1-A 1x/week (price per mow) $ 1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $1x/week/as needed $ VALLEY COMMONS PARK TURF: YES/UNK IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Fallon St. & Ginella Way (vacant land) 1-B 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ OnTurf Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ LOYAL GARDENS SUB PARK TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR S. Cottonwood Rd. to Golden Gate Ave. & South of Loyal Dr. 1-C 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ VALLEY WEST PARK TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Durston Rd. to Babcock St. & Kimball Ave. to N. Cottonwood Rd.1-D 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 2x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ NORTON EAST RANCH SUB PARK TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/SMALL/FAIR Babcock St. to Fallon & S. Eldorado to Waterlily Dr.1-E 1x/week (price per mow)$x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 2x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ BAXTER MEADOWS (Master), PH. 1-3 TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Kimberwicke St. to Baxter &Vaquero Pkwy. to Harper Puckett Rd.1-F 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 2x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $1x/week/as needed $ FLANDERS CREEK SUBDIVISION PARK 1-3 TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Annie St. to Durston Rd. & Flanders Creek Ave. to Twin Lakes Ave. 1-G 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 2x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ BAXTER MEDOWS, PH. 1 Park 1-2 TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Equestrian Ln. to Baxter Ln. & Vaquero Pkwy. to Ferguson Ave. 1-H 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/ biweekly/as needed $ 1x/biweekly/as needed $ TRADITIONS SUB PHASE 1 PARK 1-4 & 8 TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Sherwood Way to Glenwood Dr. & Flanders Creek Ave to Abigail Ln.1-I 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ DIAMOND ESTATES PUBLIC PARK TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/SMALL/FAIR Oak St. & Agate Ave. Road buffer at Oak & detention pond Area. 1-J 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 1x/year/ as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ OAK SPRINGS PARK TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES N. Ferguson Ave. to Yellowstone Ave. & Renova Ln. to Annie St. 1-K 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 1x/year/ as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ DIAMOND PARK TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/SMALL/FAIR Ferguson Ave. to Flanders Mill Rd. & Oak St. to Tanzanite Dr. 1-L 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ FOUR POINTS MINOR SUB 475 PARK TURF: YES/GOOD IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Cattail St. to Kimberwicke St. & Milkhouse Ave. to Ferguson Ave 1-M 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 1x/year/as neeeded (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ WESTBROOK SUB PUBLIC PARK 1-2 TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIU/FAIR Annie St. to Durston Rd. & Rosa Way to Loxley Dr. 1-N 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Lawn Area 1x/year/ as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST PARK TURF: UNK IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Westmorland Dr. to Vahl Way to N. Laurel Pkwy. Adjcent to Bronken Sports Park. 1-O 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 1x/year/ as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ SUNDANCE PUBLIC PARK TURF: UNK IRRIGATION: UNK Caballo Ave. to Davis Ln. & Galloway St. to Baxter Ln. 1-P 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ BOULDER CREEK PARK 1-2 TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIU/FAIR Glenellen Dr. to Annie St. & Laurel Pkwy. To Abigail Ln.1-Q 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Broad leaf weed control 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ 1x/week/as needed $ 1x/week/as needed $ ANNIE ST & COTTAGE PARK LN TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/SMALL/FAIR Small L shaped property corner of Annie St. & Cottage Park Ln. 1-R 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming)$On Turf Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application)$Spraying as needed broad leaf weed control (price per application) $ 1x/month/as needed $ 1x/month/as needed $ COTTAGE PARK LN TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR Small property Cottage Park Ln. and Hanson St. 1-S 1x/week (price per mow)$1x/week (price per trimming) $ On Turf Area 1x/year/as needed (price per application) $ Spraying as needed broad leaf weed control (price per application) $ 1x/month/as needed $1x/month/as needed $ Aerating & Thatching $ Per Hour Rates Maintenance of native grass/naturalized areas Trail maintenance Weedeating / Trimming Landscaping Clearing, brushing, pruning of vegetation Appendix C: Maintenance Schedule Zone 1 (LANDSCAPE) MOWING FREQUENCY: (TURF AREAS)TRIMMING FREQUENCY:FERTILIZER APPLICATION FREQUENCY:SPRAYING PER APPLICATION WEEDS REMOVAL FREQUENCY:DOG STATION MAINTENANCE GARBAGE TRASH REMOVAL Additional Services Zone 1: Fixed Per Hour Rates ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Parks Service/Discription Removal of seasonal debris, leaves, litter Overseeding turf areas Garbage removal $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Mowing Dog station maintenance Exhibit ADocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 269 CITY OF BOZEMAN BOUNDARY/TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Appendix C: Maintenance Schedule Zone 1 MAP/ LOCATION : OVERVIEW LK 1/21 PARKS MAINTENANCE ZONE 1-3 MAP Exhibit A DocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 270 Title Page: R.F.P.: Parks & Trail District Landscape Maintenance Services. -Zone 1 ADVAI\ITAliE LandCare Firm Name: Advantage Spraying Services, Inc -Dba: Advantage Landcare Address: 114 Wildcat Way Bozeman, MT 59718 Contact: Patrick Doran & Steve Lee Phone: (406) 924-1882 Email: advantagelandcare@gmail.com Exhibit BDocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 271 PARK NAME SIT!. DtsCRIPTION FERGUSON TURF: YESIFAlR lRRIGATION: MEADOWS PARK YES/SMALL/FAIR VAU.EY COMMONS TURF: YES/UNK IRRIGATION: PARK YES/MEOIUM/FAIR LOYAL GARDENS TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: SUB PARK YES/MEDIUM/FAIR TURF:YES/FAIR VALLEY WEST PARK IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR NORTON EAST TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: RANCH SUB PARK YES/SMALL/FAIR BAXTER MEAOOWS TURF: YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: (MO!llat),PH,1-3 YES/MEDIUM/FAIR FLANDERS CREEK TURF: YES/FAIR SUBDIVISION PARK IRRIGATION: 1'3 YESIMEOIUM/FAIR BAXTER MEDOWS, TURF:YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: PH.1 Pork1·2 YESIMEOIUM/FAIR TRACHTIONS SUB TURF: YES/FAIR PHASE 1 PARK 1-4 & rflRtGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR DIAMOND ESTATES TURF:YES/FAIR IRRIGATION: PUBLIC PARK YES/SMAl.VFAIR TURF: YES/FAIR OAK SPRINGS PARK IRRIOATION: YES TURF: YES/FAIR DIAMOND PARK IRRIGATION: YES/SMALUFAIR FOUR POINTS TURF: YESIGOOO MINORSU8475 lRRIGATION: PARK YES/MEDIUM/FAIR WESTBROOK sue TURF: YES/FAIR 1RRIGAT10N: PUBLIC PARK 1·2 YESIMEDIUIFAIR TURF: UNK THE LAKES AT IRRIGATION: VALLEY WEST PARK YES/MEOIUM/FAIR SUNDANCE PUBLIC TURF: UNK PARK IRRIGATION: UNK BOULDER CREEK TURF: YES/FAIR PARK1·2 IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIU/FAtR ANNIE ST& TURF: YES/FAIR COTTAGE PARKLN IRRIGATION: YESfSMAI.UFAIR TURF: YESJFAIR COTTAGE PARK LN IRRIGATION: YES/MEDIUM/FAIR IW'II.OCATION LOCATION: {QRE!NAAI!.A Sanden Avo & Co:odo SL FrallonSt.&GlnollaWfll (vDCDnt lal'ld) S.Cottnnwaoc1Rd.to GolclonGotoAvo.&South oll..ayalDr. OuralonRQ.l(la.bcoek$t.& l<lmbollA1'9,ION.COIIOl'IW00d Rd. Bobe:ocicSLtoFcllon & S. Eldorado to Wlllcrtlly o,. KlmbarwlekoSt.toBGXI• &VaqWll'D Pkwy. !ti HIWP« PuckottRd. Anni. SL to Duman Rd. &FlondersCl'MkAva.to Twin Lako1 Av•. Equcatl'1an Ln. to B4IClor Ln.&VoquoroPk\i,y.to Flll'glJ,onAve. Shllrv.oodWrk'(to Glof'MOOdDr,&Flandorl CNlokAvo loAblglllt Ln. 04kSL&AgotoAvo. Rood buffer Ill Oak & datonllon ponc!Aroa. N. Fcrgucon Avo, IC Yollow!ltcnoAvo,& Ro nova t.n. to Annlo SL Ferguwn Ave. lo Flandlr1 MIII Rd.&OokSLto Tanzonllo Dr. Cattnll SL to Klmborwlcko SL & Mlllchouse Ave. to Ferguson Ave Annlo St. to Ouratan Rd. &RoaoWaytolaxle)'Dr. W«Jlmorlond Or. toVohl W:,;y [0 N. Louml Pkwy. Ad}t'onlloBronkonSports P""'-Cab4Do Ave. to Davia Ul. &Galt:iwuySLtoBaxt• Ln. GlonoDon Dr. to Annla SL & Laurel Pkwy, ToAblgQG Lo. Smlllllsluipedproport)' comer d Anni• SL & CcullgoPnLn. Smnll proportyeottag& Pm Ln. ond Honson St. s.r.,ic.rotscrlptlon Mowing °"L"' 1-A 1-B 1-C 1-0 1-E 1-F 1-G 1-H 1-1 1.J 1-K 1-L 1-M 1-N 1-0 1-P 1-Q 1-R 1-S Wecdc�lna/Trlmmlna ooe: sutlon m.ilntan.inca L.ondm1plnI ClcIrlng.brushlna,prunlns0fvqet:1tl0n Mii!lntcn:inco of native sr.iss/n3tur.illzed areas Tr.iUm.ilntcn.incc Rt'mov.11 of �.ison.11 dcbrl1, lc,ivc:, litter Ovcrscedll'\llturlarcas G.1rb.isorcmov.:al Acr.illng & Thatching Appendix C: Maintenance Schedule Zone 1 (LANDSCAPE) IIOWlNG FREQUl!NCY: (TURF AREAS} TRIMUlNO FREQUENCY: FERTlUZER N'PUCAT10H FREQUEHCY: ..... , ...... $ 1'S. =,_ �..k.a OnTutfAl'IIIII c'>) • 1,r/yomiosneedOd(pncct '\�0, (prleapormow) (pncoporlrfnvnlng) \I\ �<>S."-"\ po<-) , ..... , = ,,,_,,-S:"-<-\4ci' OnTur1Areo :,-V •So, b/yoar/as noodDd (?1oo $ \'A.,S. (pricopormow) (prlcoportrimming) -� t""',.l>V-.._f\.., por apptlc:allon) 1 ..... , C."> ,_ -·�--c)..�..., 0nTur1Af'90 (JI;, $ 3U'::>' 1w/yeljr/Unood0d(pr\ce ·��75, (�co por mow) (prtco par b1mmlng) 't'\_ tvlr...t'II"''� POrarr.lk:tl.Uon) 1.,,.Gk 'l\1;6, O'O 1,,._k ?:"'"-'�-On Turf AnMI 2x/yot1rlot •�°\\1,Sb ooodod (prtcepermow) (prieeporlrlmmlng) ' .... t."()l..)'.11\c.. (prtccporappllai!lon) ,,,_,, � -. �\�-OnTurfAr'Oa2x/y$11r{DI $ \�a-."S. "' •-c:,_75. ,_,., (pricepermow) (prlcepertrlmmlng) \t\. -..l.U-.._f\_....,_ (prlcopcroppllc3Uon) ,,,_, 0-.:. 1-.�...),L'a.-' On Turf� 2J,,/yNr/u ·�\.\C/0,Cb ·��().,_,., (pncopormow) (pnceportr1mtru1g) �-�,I\. .... (pricoporapplic:Dllcn) 1 ..... k O't> 1-,".!f-.c.-\�l(' °" L.owoAnoa ex, ·u..1s.'blyearloanaedect '\\i'S, {p(lcopormo.o., IP""''°'�"""""J \� rA.h,j',\..""'-1-po<..,,i,a,""'J ,_ s 'J..-C..O, = 1-k �<>-.�\..✓ Ool.wm-00 1xlyo0rlu nooded s (/X)· (prtco parmo-N) (pricopcrtrlnvnlng) I'\...._ .1'n�'"-"'-(r;dotperappllc:Allon) 1KM'Ook ·?:>\S."" 1-�e&.._-' On L.awnArc• °" (priceperrna.v) (prieeportrlmrnlng) $ 1Xlyoar/unee6od ·��-·--�w· ... .._(prieo P«' np�c::aUcn) 1x,\,vat1IC s :)l), vi) ,_,°A.<01 v-k� Onl.O'MlAreo r;<:> 1�r/ 111 noodOd $ \d-..5. (pricepermow) (pries per t rimming) <'\::i.AN--. (prlcoporappllcatlon) ,....,, �,_,.�,_,.)__a_.., OoL.owoArao � (prlcapermow) •\oso,{prtceptrb1mmlng) 1x/yoerlunood0d $ 'J_(e '-3:) -,� t"'w..>\""" (pr100poroppl!catlon) ,,,_,, , ..... , ,1:N,\ ...}...>.\:°' OnlaM'IArell bl> (pl'tcopcrmow) $ \()l;b. a<> (pricoportrlnvnlnQ) 1,/year/unNdod • �OC--....... _ ..... i:,,\_rv,,,,.. {-po,-""') , ..... , 'Si\t), at, 1 ..... k ,1:"-�� °""""-1x/yellrlclnoeodtld S \ �'St) .CD (prlcoporma,i,) (ptlcepcrtnnvnlng) -,� �" .... �"" (prlceperappllCllllon) 1 ..... , '""""' s�<'l-'s.v.)..c.� Qol.o,mA,u Cl) • a l.\-S. =1� u needed s '\�°';> . (pricepermow) {prlcepertrlr'M'fflg) --'" ........ (pricaper�) .-,,I'-<,,�OnTurfAIGCI 1 ..... k '\�D-()b 1"'-'< 1xfyo4r/mn� ''36�. u:, (pricopcrrmow) (pric:1:1 por ll'lmmlng) r",..)v"-.�°' � per appllaatlon) \" , ..... , 0V , ..... , ��e\ On TurfAroa (pr1copormow) $ d-.75. (pt'!copcrll'lrrmlng) 17/yeat/arw,oclod •7(::e)' �-.. • -1· ...... (pneeperappUca!Jon) 1-., <>'ti 1-.�� OnTurfAro1111ll/yO,Ol'/u 0:, (pricopormow) •�()D, (price par trimming) ,..,., $1C,D, -.- -.,, Ji�f\..60\ {-po,oppllcotloo) , ..... , 1s. Ct> ,,_, �!\.6-.-,.k� ) OnTurfAmot,-Jycor/n c,, (pr1c:opormow) $ (pr'looperll1ffflling) ,_,., $ \�. 1, ""'-1)..i", ... ""' (pric,D p,or oi,pllaatlon) 1-'SD. cro ,_ -z 6-�.,., On Turf Amil txtyeor/u t:fc:, s-"-"'°'" s \r::f). (pr1cttpormow) (ptk:eperll'tmmlng) \" c----,->�-"" (prioa poro;,plcaUon) Addltk>nal Sl�cn Zone 1: Flud Per HoMr Rates P•rHourRalN $ � , <-c "� "-.<>..S-$ '1",, C> f\\.-w....s s -..n /��� 1---�s ,d.-i:,.... $ --?f:.,, o,;, $ \..I\ I>., �""'--..,..· ",'\.. $ t_:·7c;.,) !),...,.� . .., ..I $ °'T'\ 'I \_ --v,s· $ i-)lt-... s µ\� s �\ii'sc lfflAYING l'EJlt N'l'I.ICATlOM WU:011 IWIIOVM. FltfQUENCY: 000 aTATlON llAINnNAMCi! GARMCITRA&HltDIO'IM.. BttllldloafModoontrol °"" 1,r/yaarlasneeded '\�-1�unNde(j $ 1x/WNkle needed • Cprpperappllc:aUon) Brood loaf WIIOd control <lC 1x/yll11r/os needed $ \tp. 1'1/witf,)c/anoodDd $ 1WWffklunoodctd • (prlcopor�an) Broadleof�c:ontt'ol $ �':le()."" 1JJyaar/a nooded 1irlwMk/aa neoded $ 1r/wo(l/,(JunMdad $ {prlceporoppllcation) Brood lsafweod c.ontrol ·-��.(le, 1xlycar/aa nc odod 1lUWCOk/aa noedod $ 1Jl/woek/.m,nooood $ {�caporoppllcallon) Broodloofwaedcontrol u-\> 1x/yollr/os neodod $ f�tD, 1'JJwook/aa needed $ 1�necdod $ (prlcapcroppllc:.ll.lon) Bl'Old loaf wood control •:17�. at, 1ltlycwlanoodod 1'1/wook/unoodod $ 1xtwook/0snoodl-d s {pnoopo,"""'""'°"1 Broad loaf WNd control $ C\L\0, 001x/yeM/uneodod 1J/Wfl/lltlJu neoded $ 1xlwNklao nNC»d s -po<-) Brocldloafweoda,ntral ·t_\�. db 1xly0orlasnoodad 1x/blv.ook)yfnanoodod S 1�/oanoedod S {prloepo,-) Broodloofwr:iedcontrcl <:P 1x/)'ocrlas noodod $ \CJ_(). 1xlwooklu noodod $ 1'1./wodtJu nooded $ (prlcoperap�\/on) Brood lotll' weed control � 1,c,lyearlesnoeded $ \f-i(). 1xh,,oak/unocdcd $ 1Ylwod,,Ju noodod $ (pricoperapp!lctnlon) Broodloofwoodcontrol ·�,\�-Di) 1x/y11arfasnoodod hJWOClklU noodod $ 1x/\l.ook/111 noodod s (prlcoporoppllcation) Broatl leaf weod amtrol $ ® �"' 1x/yofJJ/DlnN<IOd -:,..,,o . 1�otnoedod $ 1JC/Wooklaneodld $ (prlcoporoppllcellon) Sroodlcld'woodcontrcl (.°i) 1x/yolll"/U needed s \ ,oio. ,�runeedocl $ 1xlweoklnsneodod $ {prtcaporappllcatlon) Broad loaf wood control C<> 1x/yaarfunoedcd s, L.\1'\, 1xlwock/asnCIOdtJd $ 1>rJl.t.ook.laa nooded $ (pricoperoppllcatlon) BrcNtdlcat\..oodcontrol 1xf)'Mrlan-.d $ -;)__ l\ '1-.() Cl) 1J!lweekluneeded $ 1x/Mek/csnoeded $ (prlcaporopplk:atlon) Brood lea! 'MJOd control 1Klyoar/a noodOd 'S�D. 1:r/Mok/oa nooclod $ 1wwoak/a, noodod s (prlcaperappllcatlon) Br011d laof wood COf'ltrol $ ( .. {'{\ ' (Jt, 1kfyoar/a neoded 1x/WNkJDI neoded s 1x/weokluneeded $ (prlc&pcrappllcotlon) Spniylngasnocoodbrood ot) lent wood contrcl (prico por S �a, 1 x/month/DI ncodod $ 1x1monw11,noodod $ oppllcGtlon) Sprnylng oo needed broad 91). G'D i.of'Mledcontrol(priceper S 1xlmonthlosMeded $ 1xlmonlh/nMOdod oppflcatloo) ADDmoNAL COMMENTS .)__-. M<t,.""'-,""-C\,;,GQ... � '" c... --��n\. L°'� .,,_6,�·-.• ,� ��-�IL ___ ,'\ --==r...,__'-·-.. \.. � ,,;_ '-', a • • •~ A---� l<\.�r,?,;:V ....... l ..J \ _, ...., � �. -· >..-:,.... �-s.o�.s,....'-. c.,,,,-"' c.. .. s .../ \ �N' � � � Y. -·�'-#:<C° s .... � ..... : ·. ""' I -_) Exhibit BDocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 272 Appendix A NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL PAY AFFIRMATION �\J�b� \ ..-N:'\b.( .o§<L.. (name of entity submitting) hereby affirms it will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, age, marital status, national origin, or because of actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or disability and acknowledges and understands the eventual contract will contain a provision prohibiting discrimination as described above and this prohibition on discrimination shall apply to the hiring and treatments or proposer's employees and to all subcontracts. In addition, J\�-J�L ��C.0-\-L-(name of entity submitting) hereby affirms it will abide by the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act), and has visited the State of Montana Equal Pay for Equal Work "best practices" website, https://egualpay.mt.gov/BestPractices/Employers, or equivalent "best practices publication and has read the material. y�,� S0��°'--"-"- \) __ q,_ ���� Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of submitter Exhibit BDocuSign Envelope ID: B54F657F-807D-446A-BFD3-8C31410E996E 273 274 275 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Brit Fontenot, Economic Development Director SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Task Order 6 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) for an Economic Vitality Strategy (EVS) Update to Include Arts and Culture and to Highlight Sustainability and Climate Action in the 2022-2023 EVS MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:see memo STRATEGIC PLAN:2.1 Business Growth: Support retention and growth of both the traded and local business sectors while welcoming and encouraging new and existing businesses, in coordination with the Economic Development Plan. BACKGROUND:see memo UNRESOLVED ISSUES:see memo ALTERNATIVES:see memo FISCAL EFFECTS:see memo Attachments: CC Memo - Task Order 6 - EPS - EVS Update BF FINAL 2.13.23.docx Task Order 6 - EPS - EVS Update FINAL BF 2.13.23.docx Task Order 6 Budget EDS Revisions to EVS FINAL BF 02-13- 2023.xlsx 21- EPS - Economic Development Strategy 2021 Term Contract.pdf Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy 10.17.22 Final Complete.pdf Report compiled on: February 13, 2023 276 Commission Memorandum REPORT TO:Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM:Brit Fontenot Economic Development Director SUBJECT:Task Order 6 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) for an Economic Vitality Strategy (EVS) Update to Include Arts and Culture and Highlight Sustainability/Climate Action in the 2022/2023 EVS. MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Consent RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to sign Task Order 6 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) for an Economic Vitality Strategy (EVS) update to include arts and culture and highlight sustainability/climate action in the 2022/2023 EVS. BACKGROUND: At the January 10, 2023 Bozeman City Commission Meeting, the Commission directed staff to work with members of the arts community and Economic and Planning Systems to refine the proposed Economic Vitality Strategy to include stakeholder input from the Bozeman arts community and quantify the economic impact of arts and culture in the Bozeman economy. The Commission also directed staff to better highlight elements of the plan as they relate to sustainability and climate action. FISCAL EFFECTS:Additional costs for expanding the plan is beyond the original scope of services and budget for the project. The original project budget was $100,000. The expansion of the scope discussed above in this memo is $17,600. The funds are available in the current economic development budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Task Order 6 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc; 2. Economic Vitality Strategy Update Scope of Work and Budget; 277 3. 2021 Executed Professional Services Agreement and Term Contract with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc; and 4. 2022/2023 Draft EVS Strategy as presented to the Commission on January 10, 2023. 278 City of Bozeman Term Contract with Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Task Order Number 6: Economic Development Strategy Update PROJECT:Economic Development Strategy Update Issued under the authority of the City of Bozeman Professional Services Agreement Term Contract with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. to support Economic Development and Community Housing programs. This Task Order is dated [] between the City of Bozeman Economic Development Department and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) (Contractor). The following representatives have been designated for the work performed under this Task Order: City: Brit Fontenot, Economic Development Director Contractor: Brian Duffany, Executive Vice President, Economic & Planning Systems SCOPE OF WORK:Economic Development Strategy update additional arts and culture stakeholder engagement and edits, memo outlining and highlighting sustainability/climate change elements of the EVS. COMPENSATION:EPS will bill for its services on a time and materials basis with a project total not-to-exceed $17,600. The provisions of the Professional Services Agreement Term Contract shall govern the Work. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties authorized to commit resources of the parties have executed this Task Order: City of Bozeman Economic & Planning Systems Jeff Mihelich Brian Duffany City Manager Executive Vice President ________________________________ 279 Daniel R. Guimond, Principal 280 Task Order 6 Budget $17,600 Pyszka Hours Principal Associate Production Hours Budget $200 by Task $250 $145 $110 by Task by Task Task 1. Stakeholder Engagement Kick-off meeting with client 2 2 2 0 0 2 $900 Preparation for presentations and meetings 8 8 0 0 0 0 $1,600 Stakeholder Meetings 16 16 0 0 0 0 $3,200 Summary of Engagement and Recommendations 4 4 0 0 0 0 $800 Additional Virtual Meetings if Required 8 8 2 0 0 2 $2,100 Subtotal 38 38 4 0 0 4 $8,600 Task 2. EVS Edits Revisions to Strategy 10 10 2 8 4 14 $4,100 Climate Change Memo 8 8 0 0 0 0 $1,600 Revisions to Action Matrix 4 4 0 0 0 0 $800 Staff Review Meeting 2 2 2 0 0 2 $900 Commission Presentation (Virtual)2 2 0 0 0 0 $400 Subtotal 26 26 4 8 4 16 $7,800 Total 64 64 8 8 4 20 $16,400 $12,800 $3,600 Expenses Travel $1,200 $0 $1,200 Total Budget Not to Exceed $14,000 $3,600 $17,600 Bridge EPS 281 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 1 of 13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 22 nd day of June, 2021 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA,a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and, ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC., 730 17th Street, Suite 630, Denver, CO 80202, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” The City and Contractor may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose: City agrees to enter this Agreement with Contractor to perform for City services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. Term/Effective Date:This Agreement is effective upon the Effective Date and will expire on the 30 day of June 2026, or the completion of any written Task Order initiated prior to June 30, 2026 unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement. 3. Scope of Services: Contractor will perform the work and provide the services in accordance with the specific services and corresponding schedule as mutually agreed upon by City and Contractor and included in each individual Task Order executed under the authority of this Agreement. Task Orders shall be attached and made part of this Agreement. For conflicts between this Agreement and the Scope of Services, unless specifically provided otherwise, the Agreement governs. 4. Payment: The terms of compensation to Contractor shall be agreed upon and included in each Task Order. City agrees to pay Contractor the amount specified in the individual Task Orders. Any alteration or deviation from the described services that involves additional costs above the Agreement amount will be performed by Contractor after written request by the City, and will 282 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 2 of 13 become an additional charge over and above the amount listed in the Scope of Services. The City must agree in writing upon any additional charges. 5. Contractor’s Representations: To induce City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor makes the following representations: a. Contractor has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of this Agreement, the Scope of Services, and with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress or performance of the Scope of Services. b. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has the experience and ability to perform the services required by this Agreement; that it will perform the services in a professional, competent and timely manner and with diligence and skill; that it has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement and grant the rights granted in it; and that its performance of this Agreement shall not infringe upon or violate the rights of any third party, whether rights of copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, libel, slander or any other rights of any nature whatsoever, or violate any federal, state and municipal laws. The City will not determine or exercise control as to general procedures or formats necessary to have these services meet this warranty. 6. Independent Contractor Status/Labor Relations: The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this Agreement and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies handbook and may not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 39, Chapter 71, Montana Code Annotated (MCA), and the Occupational Disease Act of Montana, Title 39, Chapter 71, MCA. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all members and employees of Contractor’s business, except for those members who are exempted by law. Contractor shall furnish the City with copies showing one of the following: (1) a binder for workers’ compensation coverage by an insurer licensed and authorized to provide workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Montana; or (2) proof of exemption from workers’ compensation granted by law for independent contractors. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement, any labor problems or disputes of any type arise or materialize which in turn cause any services to cease for any period of time, Contractor 283 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 3 of 13 specifically agrees to take immediate steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. Contractor shall provide immediate relief to the City so as to permit the services to continue at no additional cost to City. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and liabilities arising out of, resulting from, or occurring in connection with any labor problems or disputes or any delays or stoppages of work associated with such problems or disputes. 7. Indemnity/Waiver of Claims/Insurance: For other than professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and officers (collectively referred to for purposes of this Section as the City) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, fees and costs (including attorney’s fees and the costs and fees of expert witness and consultants), losses, expenses, liabilities (including liability where activity is inherently or intrinsically dangerous) or damages of whatever kind or nature connected therewith and without limit and without regard to the cause or causes thereof or the negligence of any party or parties that may be asserted against, recovered from or suffered by the City occasioned by, growing or arising out of or resulting from or in any way related to: (i) the negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of the Contractor; or (ii) any negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of any of the Contractor’s agents. For the professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless against claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses, including reasonable defense attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Contractor or Contractor’s agents or employees. Such obligations shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist. The indemnification obligations of this Section must not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any common-law or statutory rights of the City as indemnitee(s) which would otherwise exist as to such indemnitee(s). Contractor’s indemnity under this Section shall be without regard to and without any right to contribution from any insurance maintained by City. Should the City be required to bring an action against the Contractor to assert its right to defense or indemnification under this Agreement or under the Contractor’s applicable insurance 284 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 4 of 13 policies required below, the City shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in asserting its right to indemnification or defense but only if a court of competent jurisdiction determines the Contractor was obligated to defend the claim(s) or was obligated to indemnify the City for a claim(s) or any portion(s) thereof. In the event of an action filed against the City resulting from the City’s performance under this Agreement, the City may elect to represent itself and incur all costs and expenses of suit. Contractor also waives any and all claims and recourse against the City, including the right of contribution for loss or damage to person or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to the performance of this Agreement except “responsibility for [City’s] own fraud, for willful injury to the person or property of another, or for violation of law, whether willful or negligent” as per 28-2-702, MCA. These obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement and the services performed hereunder. In addition to and independent from the above, Contractorshall at Contractor’s expense secure insurance coverage through an insurance company or companies duly licensed and authorized to conduct insurance business in Montana which insures the liabilities and obligations specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance coverage shall not contain any exclusion for liabilities specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance shall cover and apply to all claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses that may be asserted or claimed against, recovered from, or suffered by the City without limit and without regard to the cause therefore and which is acceptable to the City. Contractor shall furnish to the City an accompanying certificate of insurance and accompanying endorsements in amounts not less than as follows: Workers’ Compensation – statutory; Employers’ Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; Commercial General Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 property damage/bodily injury per accident; and Professional Liability - $1,000,000 per claim; $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The above amounts shall be exclusive of defense costs. The City shall be endorsed as an additional or named insured on a primary non-contributory basis on both the Commercial General 285 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 5 of 13 and Automobile Liability policies. The insurance and required endorsements must be in a form suitable to City and shall include no less than a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Contractor shall notify City within two (2) business days of Contractor’s receipt of notice that any required insurance coverage will be terminated or Contractor’s decision to terminate any required insurance coverage for any reason. The City must approve all insurance coverage and endorsements prior to the Contractor commencing work. 8. Termination for Contractor’s Fault: a.If Contractor refuses or fails to timely do the work, or any part thereof, or fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, or otherwise breaches any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City may, by written notice, terminate this Agreement and the Contractor’s right to proceed with all or any part of the work (“Termination Notice Due to Contractor’s Fault”). The City may then take over the work and complete it, either with its own resources or by re-letting the contract to any other third party. b. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 8, Contractor shall be entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered. c.Any termination provided for by this Section 8 shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled under the law or at equity. d.In the event of termination under this Section 8, Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 9. Termination for City’s Convenience: a.Should conditions arise which, in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, make it advisable to the City to cease performance under this Agreement, the City may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Contractor (“Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience”). The termination shall be effective in the manner specified in the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience and shall be without prejudice to any claims that the City may otherwise have against Contractor. 286 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 6 of 13 b.Upon receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, unless otherwise directed in the Notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease performance under this Agreement and make every reasonable effort to refrain from continuing work, incurring additional expenses or costs under this Agreement and shall immediately cancel all existing orders or contracts upon terms satisfactory to the City. Contractor shall do only such work as may be necessary to preserve, protect, and maintain work already completed or immediately in progress. c. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 9, Contractor is entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered on or before the receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience. d. The compensation described in Section 9(c) is the sole compensation due to Contractor for its performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 10. Limitation on Contractor’s Damages; Time for Asserting Claim: a.In the event of a claim for damages by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor’s damages shall be limited to contract damages and Contractor hereby expressly waives any right to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature or kind. b. In the event Contractor wants to assert a claim for damages of any kind or nature, Contractor shall provide City with written notice of its claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding and giving rise to the claim, and the total amount of damages sought by the claim, within thirty (30) days of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the claim. In the event Contractor fails to provide such notice, Contractor shall waive all rights to assert such claim. 11. Representatives and Notices: a. City’s Representative: The City’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be David Fine, Urban Renewal Program Manager, or such other individual as City shall designate in writing. Whenever approval or authorization from or 287 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 7 of 13 communication or submission to City is required by this Agreement, such communication or submission shall be directed to the City’s Representative and approvals or authorizations shall be issued only by such Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when City’s Representative is not available, Contractor may direct its communication or submission to other designated City personnel or agents as designated by the City in writing and may receive approvals or authorization from such persons. b. Contractor’s Representative: The Contractor’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Brian Duffany, Executive Vice President, or such other individual as Contractor shall designate in writing. Whenever direction to or communication with Contractor is required by this Agreement, such direction or communication shall be directed to Contractor’s Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when Contractor’s Representative is not available, City may direct its direction or communication to other designated Contractor personnel or agents. c. Notices: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided to the Representatives named in this Section. Notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered by courier to Party’s address shown above during normal business hours of the recipient; or when sent, if sent by email or fax (with a successful transmission report) to the email address or fax number provided by the Party’s Representative; or on the fifth business day following mailing, if mailed by ordinary mail to the address shown above, postage prepaid. 12. Permits: Contractor shall provide all notices, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, including a City of Bozeman business license, and inspections from applicable governmental authorities, and pay all fees and charges in connection therewith. 13 Laws and Regulations: Contractor shall comply fully with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and municipal ordinances including, but not limited to, all workers’ compensation laws, all environmental laws including, but not limited to, the generation and disposal of hazardous waste, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), the safety rules, codes, and provisions of the Montana Safety Act in Title 50, Chapter 71, MCA, all applicable City, County, and State building and electrical codes, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all non-discrimination, affirmative action, and utilization of minority and small business statutes and regulations. 14. Nondiscrimination and Equal Pay: The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. 288 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 8 of 13 The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 15. Intoxicants; DOT Drug and Alcohol Regulations/Safety and Training: Contractor shall not permit or suffer the introduction or use of any intoxicants, including alcohol or illegal drugs, by any employee or agent engaged in services to the City under this Agreement while on City property or in the performance of any activities under this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges it is aware of and shall comply with its responsibilities and obligations under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations governing anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention plans and related testing. City shall have the right to request proof of such compliance and Contractor shall be obligated to furnish such proof. The Contractor shall be responsible for instructing and training the Contractor's employees and agents in proper and specified work methods and procedures. The Contractor shall provide continuous inspection and supervision of the work performed. The Contractor is responsible for instructing its employees and agents in safe work practices. 16. Modification and Assignability:This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except by written agreement signed by both parties hereto. The Contractor may not subcontract or assign Contractor’s rights, including the right to compensation or duties arising hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Any subcontractor or assignee will be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 289 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 9 of 13 17. Reports/Accountability/Public Information: Contractor agrees to develop and/or provide documentation as requested by the City demonstrating Contractor’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Contractor shall allow the City, its auditors, and other persons authorized by the City to inspect and copy its books and records for the purpose of verifying that the reimbursement of monies distributed to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement was used in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. The Contractor shall not issue any statements, releases or information for public dissemination without prior approval of the City. 18.Non-Waiver: A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of any terms or conditions of this Agreement does not limit the other party’s right to enforce such term or conditions or to pursue any available legal or equitable rights in the event of any subsequent default or breach. 19. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In the event it becomes necessary for either Party to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party or the Party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including the City Attorney’s Office staff. 20. Taxes: Contractor is obligated to pay all taxes of any kind or nature and make all appropriate employee withholdings. 21. Dispute Resolution: a.Any claim, controversy, or dispute between the parties, their agents, employees, or representatives shall be resolved first by negotiation between senior-level personnel from each party duly authorized to execute settlement agreements. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the parties may invite an independent, disinterested mediator to assist in the negotiated settlement discussions. b. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the dispute was first raised, then such dispute may only be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in compliance with the Applicable Law provisions of this Agreement. 22. Survival: Contractor’s indemnification shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for the maximum period allowed under applicable law. 290 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 10 of 13 23. Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not be construed as a part of the Agreement or as a limitation on the scope of the particular paragraphs to which they refer. 24. Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the balance thereof shall continue in effect. 25. Applicable Law: The parties agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. 26. Binding Effect: This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. 27. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties, does not constitute a third-party beneficiary agreement, and may not be relied upon or enforced by a third party. 28. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together constitute one instrument. 29. Integration: This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement of the parties. Covenants or representations not contained herein or made a part thereof by reference, are not binding upon the parties. There are no understandings between the parties other than as set forth in this Agreement. All communications, either verbal or written, made prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby abrogated and withdrawn unless specifically made a part of this Agreement by reference. 30. Consent to Electronic Signatures: The Parties have consented to execute this Agreement electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. 291 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 11 of 13 **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written or as recorded in an electronic signature. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA ____________________________________ CONTRACTOR (Type Name Above) By________________________________ By__________________________________ Jeff Mihelich, City Manager Print Name: ___________________________ Print Title: ____________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 292 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 12 of 13 Exhibit “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES The selected consultant may assist the City on any task defined by the general scope of work as directed by written task order. A) Economic Development Strategy and Implementation Provide strategic, data-driven advice regarding the feasibility of various development types and projects and provide guidance on the tools, public infrastructure, programs, partnerships, incentives and policies that can stimulate the desired development. Background and experience in analyzing regulations and development codes and policies to support strategic objectives Commercial and Mixed-Use District Development strategies and implementation. Perform market analysis to support policy and land use decisions. Create strategic Economic Development Strategies and Action Plans Create data driven marking materials that reflect community assets to welcome talent and business for key clusters B) Economic Development and Real Estate Financial Analysis Provide robust and data rich assessments of Bozeman and Gallatin County’s real estate and housing market. o Regional growth trends related to population, employment including tracking key employment sectiors, and demographic data o For-sale Market o Rental Market o Commercial and Residential Market Trends o Affordability Indicators Provide data driven analysis to support economic development strategy and implementation of that strategy. C) Public-Private Partnerships Assist in negotiating and structuring public-private partnerships that are beneficial to the City of Bozeman. o Provide guidance on the development of shared structured and surface parking facilities. o Provide guidance on attracting and facilitating mixed use investment in key districts. o Provide guidance on the development of workforce and affordable housing projects, deal structures and incentives Provide robust and detailed analysis and financial pro formas to examine the financial feasibility of specific projects and provide gap financing analysis to right size economic development incentives. Project TIF cash flows based on existing projects and projected projects to assist with obtaining financing, including bonding. 293 Professional Services Agreement for Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Term Contract FY 2021 – FY 2027 Page 13 of 13 D) Building and Development Conceptualization Provide ongoing assistance in developing Bozeman’s mixed-use districts as a specific kinds of places by working with property owners and developers to advance building concepts and formats that are consistent with the aspirations of Bozeman’s guiding plans, while staying feasible in Bozeman’s real estate market. The firm or team will demonstrate competency in urban and landscape planning and design and be able to produce visioning documents that show the integration of plans and projects with the built environment. 294 CITY OF BOZEMAN Economic Vitality Strategy (EVS) October 2022 295 PREPARED BY: 296 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Strategy Purpose .................................................................................................................... 1 What is Economic Vitality? ..................................................................................................... 1 The Gallatin Valley Story ............................................................................................................ 5 Regional Overview ................................................................................................................. 8 Industry Clusters ...................................................................................................................13 National Trends .........................................................................................................................14 Equity ....................................................................................................................................14 Housing Availability ...............................................................................................................17 Climate Change .....................................................................................................................18 Early Learning/Child Care......................................................................................................19 High School Skills Development ............................................................................................21 Small Business Development ................................................................................................21 The Economic Vitality Strategy .................................................................................................24 Vision ....................................................................................................................................24 Values ...................................................................................................................................24 Guiding Principles .................................................................................................................24 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................25 Action Matrix..........................................................................................................................28 Evaluation Framework ...........................................................................................................28 Attachment A: Economic Conditions Analysis Attachment B: Action Matrix 297 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Bozeman is an economic hub for the broader Gallatin Valley and State of Montana. Recognizing that economies and the workforce are not limited by jurisdictional boundaries, the Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy (EVS) is intended to serve the larger Gallatin Valley area. It will be monitored by City of Bozeman staff to ensure implementation, but it requires engagement from various stakeholders across the Valley. STRATEGY PURPOSE This document is aimed at regional, city and county economic development practitioners, business leaders, elected officials and stakeholders implementing programs that support the growth of businesses and enhance opportunities for individuals to access economic mobility in the Gallatin Valley. This requires alignment and implementation of actions across government agencies and organizations. The Strategy provides deliberate direction to guide actions that will evolve over the next five years to meet dynamic economic and business conditions. The Strategy is constant; the actions and organizations involved in implementation are dynamic. Educate The Bozeman EVS is founded on the vision that the future Gallatin Valley economy will equitably serve residents that live and work in the region. The vision needs broad support and this document should be used to engage elected officials, business leaders, and stakeholders to help amplify the vision and providing support through their actions. Invest The EVS should also be used to leverage greater investment in the region by providing data and rationale used to: 1) obtain grants to fund implementation; 2) encourage private investment; and 3) align federal and state legislative agendas to collaboratively solicit funding to support strategic projects. Collaborate Many organizations are actively trying to create equitable economic growth across the region. It is important to collaborate to maximize collective efforts by: • Coordinating with City of Bozeman staff to let them know about each organization’s work so it can be leveraged across the region. • Engaging other organizations or city departments within a jurisdiction to break down silos and leverage resources to the greatest extent possible and elevate one another’s work. • Supporting programs led by other organizations that implement the Strategy through funding and/or promotion. WHAT IS ECONOMIC VITALITY? Economic vitality is the maintenance of a strong diverse economy with enough growth to provide opportunities for the increasing local population. Economic vitality also encompasses the ability for residents to access jobs and opportunities that contribute to quality of life and 298 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 2 financial security. One of the foundational elements for economic vitality is an economic base of traded and local sector businesses that provide various services to the community and job opportunities to create wealth. Traded and Local Sectors Traded sector (also referred to as an export or basic sector) businesses include industries and employers which produce goods and services that are exported outside the production region and therefore bring in new income to the area (e.g., manufactured goods, software development). Bringing new income to the region is critical because it creates a multiplier effect that then supports other local sector jobs. Workers in the traded sector tend to have higher educational attainment and earn higher average wages than local sector workers which increases the overall economic impact. As the job base expands, a community is more attractive to employees because there are more options for career growth. In turn, as employment grows, there is more career mobility for people and competition among employers which can ultimately increase wages. As the traded sectors grow, they create an environment that allows entrepreneurs to develop skills and resources on the job that may encourage them to start a new business and increase employment opportunities within the region. Furthermore, some traded sector companies support a supply chain effect that creates the need for additional companies to supply components of a product that is manufactured or to provide additional services. Cities and regions have concentrations of different types of traded sector industries that differentiate them from other places and can be leveraged for economic development (e.g., Boston has biotech, Houston has energy engineering, and New York has finance). Local sector business consists of industries and firms that are likely to be present in every region. They produce goods and services that are consumed locally in the region where they were made, and therefore largely recirculate existing income in the area (e.g., breweries, physician offices, banks). These businesses are important as they make a community distinct, depending how they are provided by local businesses, and provide amenities to attract young professionals and families that drive the new economy. A sampling of traded and local sector businesses in the Gallatin Valley is indicated in Figure 1 below. In the Gallatin Valley, the difference between traded and local sectors is not as clear. Since tourism is a large portion of the economy, local sectors – especially retail, food and beverage, and hospitality – are bringing in outside income from visitors. However, these local sectors still have lower wages and lower economic impacts than traded sectors. It is important for the Gallatin Valley to work on diversifying the economy so it is not overly dependent on tourism. 299 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 3 Figure 1: Example of Gallatin Valley Traded and Local Sector Businesses Source: Bridge Economic Development Traded sector industries have the largest economic impact per job even though they represent fewer jobs than local sectors. Traded sector jobs account for about 34 percent of the economy with average wages of $68,200 per year, as shown in Table 1. Local sector jobs make up 66 percent of the economy with average wages of $42,800. In the U.S. as a whole, traded sectors comprise 36 percent of all jobs which generate 50 percent of the income and 96.5 percent of all patents.1 Traded sector jobs provide a larger proportion of the national income and are responsible for almost all innovation as measured by the quantity of patents associated with the industry. 1 https://clustermapping.us/cluster 300 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 4 Table 1: Comparison of Traded and Local Sector Wages, Gallatin County There is an interdependence or multiplier impact between traded and local sector companies. In general, adding one additional skilled job in the traded sector can generate roughly 1.5 to 2.5 jobs in local goods and services. A strong local sector therefore depends on a strong traded sector. And a stronger traded sector-based economy is more resilient to economic shocks like those created by the COVID-19 pandemic and other natural disasters. Local sector businesses typically have a lower barrier to entry as they can require less capital investment and may not require a four-year degree. The local sectors therefore have many opportunities for under-represented and under-resourced individuals to gain access into the market and build wealth. Therefore, local sector businesses are often considered an equity on- ramp opportunity. However, it is important to not entirely focus on local sector businesses as an opportunity for equity. By only using a local cluster focus, a region can ultimately exacerbate income inequality as underserved and under-represented communities are not connected to higher wage employment opportunities among tradable industries. Therefore, it is important to provide equitable opportunities within traded sector industries as well. This Strategy considers both traded and local sectors as part of the overall economy and how they both provide distinct contributions and opportunities for the region. Gallatin County Ann.Jobs Industry NAICS Avg. Wage 2020 2020 Economic Base/Traded Sectors Finance/Insurance 52 $96,600 1,619 Prof. & Tech Services 54 $79,200 4,829 Mining 21 $92,400 188 Information 51 $139,800 698 Mgmt. of Companies 55 $79,700 234 Wholesale Trade 42 $70,100 1,819 Manufacturing 31-33 $55,400 3,599 Ag./Forest/Hunting 11 $40,000 701 Transport./Warehousing 48-49 $44,500 1,302 Admin/Waste Mgmt 56 $40,200 2,260 Subtotal / Average $68,200 17,249 34.1% Local Sectors Construction 23 $58,100 6,413 Retail Trade 44-45 $40,100 8,197 Real Estate 53 $50,400 1,197 Education 61 $34,500 834 Health Care 62 $53,200 5,994 Arts/Rec 71 $27,300 1,463 Hotel/Restaurant 72 $26,600 6,920 Other 81 $40,900 2,323 Subtotal / Average $42,800 33,341 65.9% Total $50,600 50,590 100.0% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW; Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[213051-City County 2dig NAICS Employment Data_10-01-21.xlsx]T-EVS_Table1 301 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 5 THE GALLATIN VALLEY STORY The Gallatin Valley is an area within Gallatin County where most of the County’s population and jobs are located. There is no official or administrative definition of the Gallatin Valley, but it is generally known as the flat, semi-arid, low elevation lands between Bozeman Pass (on the east) and the City of Three Forks (on the west) along the I-90 corridor, illustrated in Figure 2. These are historic Native American lands used in the summer months to hunt, fish, and prepare for the long winter. Today, after settlers displaced the Native American population, it includes the municipalities of Bozeman, Belgrade, Manhattan, and Three Forks plus the unincorporated areas of Four Corners, Gallatin Gateway, and other smaller unincorporated communities. The population of this region is approximately 110,000 including the City of Bozeman (51,000) and Belgrade (10,800). The City of Bozeman is the third-largest city in the State of Montana, the largest City in the Gallatin Valley, and home of Montana State University (MSU). Surrounded by scenic mountains, rugged trails, and fish-filled rivers, Bozeman is an outdoor enthusiast’s dream. Adventure seekers have discovered that Bozeman also offers economic opportunity with a vibrant and diverse industry base ranging from photonics to specialty manufacturing. With the proximity of the Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, the “Triangle” - comprised of Belgrade, Four Corners, and Bozeman - serves as the economic hub for the Gallatin Valley and beyond. A unifying factor across the Valley is a culture of grit, smarts, and strong work ethic that encourages entrepreneurs to thrive and innovation to emerge. This forward-thinking population prizes sustainable practices and solutions to shift climate change with an understanding that precious natural resources (e.g., water) and the tourism trade depend on a healthy environment. The residents of Gallatin Valley respect hard work and diverse individuals that reside year-round in the community and are committed to sustainable long-term growth. Wealth is defined by a personal lifestyle that affords the ability to live, educate, recreate and commune in Gallatin Valley year-round. While not within the Gallatin Valley proper, there are three important nearby assets and communities: Bridger Bowl Ski Area, Big Sky and Big Sky Mountain Resort, and West Yellowstone. Bridger Bowl is one of the oldest winter sports areas in the west and is known among dedicated skiers for its challenging terrain and low-key local crowd. Big Sky has emerged over the past decade or so as one of the top winter sports destinations in North American. It is known for its massive 5,000+ acre size and some of the most difficult runs in North America. It is also one of the most luxurious and exclusive mountain communities in North America. Homeowners and visitors include the ultra-wealthy, CEOs, and venture capital investors that largely reside in the Yellowstone Club and Spanish Peaks. The growth of Big Sky has brought an influx of wealth and investment to the Gallatin Valley, which is funding startups and bringing outpost office locations of larger firms to the region. The Town of West Yellowstone is the western gateway to Yellowstone National Park. Thousands of visitors stay in and pass-through Bozeman and West Yellowstone each year on their way to and from Yellowstone National Park (YNP). West Yellowstone is a year-round recreation destination in itself with guided snowmobiling and ski touring in the winter, hunting, and fishing and hiking in the warmer months. 302 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 6 Figure 2. Gallatin Valley Region Source: EPS 303 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 7 In addition to a vibrant natural setting, Gallatin Valley benefits from a well-supported and thriving arts and culture scene. Because it enhances the quality of life, this asset is an important complement to community development, enriching local amenities and attracting young professionals to the area. Furthermore, arts and culture create job opportunities and stimulate local economies through consumer purchases and tourism, which contribute greatly to state economic growth. The Gallatin Valley also has economic linkages to other places in Montana. Along the I-90 corridor, there is bioscience collaboration (and competition) between MSU in Bozeman and the University of Montana in Missoula. Billings Clinic is expanding its health care services in Bozeman and staff and doctors share time between the two regions. Some workers are commuting from other counties due to housing costs and preference. With the growth of remote working, there is an opportunity to shift some of the jobs in Gallatin Valley to these rural communities to their benefit. Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport (BZN) is the busiest airport in the state with 1.9 million passengers in 2021 compared to approximately 700,000 at Billings Logan International Airport. BZN airport increases the reach of the Gallatin Valley with direct flights indicated in Figure 3 to major cities throughout the U.S. The airport is a major economic engine that brings in tourists, but also investment and innovation. Figure 3. Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport direct flights 304 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 8 REGIONAL OVERVIEW Population The population of Gallatin County is 119,000 and has grown by a third since 2010 at an annual rate of 2.6 percent per year (Table 2). The City of Bozeman has over 50,000 people now which places it in a new category of eligibility for federal transportation and community development grant funding. Bozeman added over 14,000 people since 2010 at a rapid annual rate of 2.9 percent. The entire Valley is growing fast, as Belgrade grew by over 40 percent at 3.3 percent per year. The unincorporated remainder of the County, including Big Sky, Four Corners, and Gallatin Gateway added over 12,000 people. Table 1. Population by Place, Gallatin County Economy In Gallatin County there were nearly 60,000 wage and salary jobs in 2020 plus another 25,000- 30,000 sole proprietor jobs (self-employed) for a total of about 90,000 jobs. Within the City of Bozeman there were about 30,000 private wage and salary jobs plus 4,200 faculty and staff at MSU. The largest industries in the City of Bozeman and Gallatin County are local and tourism sectors including retail trade, hotels and restaurants, construction, and health care (Figure 4). The traded sectors of professional and technical services and manufacturing are the next largest groups of industries. These data show that the area is today heavily reliant on trade and tourism. Ann. Growth 2010 2021 Total Change % Change Rate Bozeman 37,354 51,405 14,051 37.6%2.9% Belgrade 7,535 10,796 3,261 43.3%3.3% Manhattan 1,525 1,829 304 19.9%1.7% Three Forks 1,871 2,375 504 26.9%2.2% Unincorporated 43,099 55,290 12,191 28.3%2.3% Gallatin County 89,513 119,320 29,807 33.3%2.6% Source: ESRI, Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[Population, Gallatin County, MT.xlsx]Sheet2 305 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 9 Figure 4. Wage and salary jobs by industry, Bozeman and Gallatin County, 2020 The economy in Gallatin County and Gallatin Valley is changing rapidly, however. First, the County added 7,000 jobs from 2015 through 2020, a growth rate of 2.6 percent per year and a 13.5 percent increase (Table 3). The industries with the most growth are highlighted below. ▪ Professional and technical services added 934 jobs with average wages near $80,000 per year. This sector had the most growth outside of construction. This is a significant change and shows that companies in Greater Bozeman are expanding, and new firms are being formed or attracted. The area is attracting knowledge-based companies and workers. ▪ Countywide, construction was also one of the fastest growing industries with 1,700 jobs added from 2015 through 2020. Growth in construction jobs is being fueled by major resort projects are underway in Big Sky, plus the growth in the Gallatin County. Anecdotally, many construction workers are moving to the area temporarily to fill jobs and may move to other locations as major projects are completed or if the economy slows. ▪ Manufacturing also had significant growth which is rare in small metro areas. Manufacturing is a diverse and important sector in Greater Bozeman. This sector grew by 562 jobs with average wages of about $55,000. ▪ Health care also grew significantly, which is consistent with national trends. People are living longer, more people have health insurance, and the large baby boomer population $40,100 $26,600 $58,100 $53,200 $79,200 $55,400 $40,900 $40,200 $70,100 $96,600 $27,300 $44,500 $50,400 $34,500 $40,000 $139,800 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Retail Trade Hotel/Restaurant Construction Health Care Prof. & Tech Services Manufacturing Other Admin/Waste Mgmt Wholesale Trade Finance/Insurance Arts/Rec Transport./Warehousing Real Estate Education Ag./Forest/Hunting Information Total Jobs Bozeman Gallatin County Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; MT Dept. of Labor; Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[213051-City County 2dig NAICS 306 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 10 is aging and increasing health care demand. Health care added 881 jobs, a 17 percent increase. Table 2. Change in wage and salary jobs by industry 2015-2020 and 2020 average wages Economy Comparisons Comparing the Gallatin County and Bozeman economy to other areas provides additional context for the importance of economic diversity. First, a metric called a location quotient (LQ) is used to compare the mix of jobs in traded and local sectors in comparison counties. Next, the economic productivity of each area is shown – areas that have higher concentrations of traded sector jobs have more economic productivity. Ann. Avg. Industry 2015 2020 Change % Change Wage 2020 Economic Base/Traded Sectors Finance/Insurance 1,447 1,619 172 11.9%$96,600 Prof. & Tech Services 3,895 4,829 934 24.0%$79,200 Mining 197 188 -9 -4.6%$92,400 Information 578 698 120 20.8%$139,800 Mgmt. of Companies 252 234 -18 -7.1%$79,700 Wholesale Trade 1,582 1,819 237 15.0%$70,100 Manufacturing 3,037 3,599 562 18.5%$55,400 Ag./Forest/Hunting 554 701 147 26.5%$40,000 Transport./Warehousing 1,284 1,302 18 1.4%$44,500 Admin/Waste Mgmt 1,730 2,260 530 30.6%$40,200 Subtotal / Average 14,556 17,249 2,693 18.5%$68,200 Local Sectors Construction 4,754 6,413 1,659 34.9%$58,100 Retail Trade 7,584 8,197 613 8.1%$40,100 Real Estate 880 1,197 317 36.0%$50,400 Education 657 834 177 26.9%$34,500 Health Care 5,113 5,994 881 17.2%$53,200 Arts/Rec 1,419 1,463 44 3.1%$27,300 Hotel/Restaurant 7,065 6,920 -145 -2.1%$26,600 Other 1,994 2,323 329 16.5%$40,900 Subtotal / Average 29,466 33,341 3,875 13.2%$42,800 Total (disclosable)44,022 50,590 6,568 14.9%$51,500 Total Jobs (without disclosure)52,059 59,071 7,012 13.5% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW; Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[213051-City County 2dig NAICS Employment Data_10-01-21.xlsx]T-EVS_Table2 Jobs Note: Industry employment figures do not include all jobs due to privacy limitations. Summing employment by industry components yields less jobs than the actual totals which are not limited by privacy disclosure issues. 307 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 11 A location quotient (LQ) measures the concentration of an industry in an area as a ratio of the percentage of jobs in the analysis area divided by the percentage in the U.S. A LQ ratio is used to compare the concentrations of industries across different regions and asses local industry strengths or specializations. The LQ is important for determining an inherent economic strength of a community. In developing an economic vitality strategy, it is best to invest time and money where there is a competitive advantage already existing in the community rather than trying to create an industry cluster without an intrinsic base. The LQs for traded and local sectors in Gallatin County are compared to several comparison Counties with their major city noted in Table 3. ▪ Bozeman has lower concentrations in most traded sectors than the comparison communities and higher concentrations in local sectors. ▪ As larger cities/metros, Boulder and Boise have more diverse economies. ▪ Boulder and Boise/Ada County have higher concentrations of jobs in knowledge and financial industries. ▪ Ogden, UT/Weber County has more than twice the manufacturing concentration than Bozeman (aerospace, defense, outdoor products, advanced materials) ▪ Boulder and Fort Collins also have higher concentrations of manufacturing at 1.29 and 1.02. The differences in the mix of jobs and industries in each area is due to numerous historical, geographic, and economic factors. How an area was settled historically (e.g. agriculture, railroad, mining, university) influences the early and legacy industries in that community. The location and proximity to other cities and industries also affects the economic composition. Larger cities and counties, and cities and counties within larger metro areas also tend to have more diverse economies and more racial and ethnic diversity. 308 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 12 Table 3. Location quotient comparisons As shown below in Figure 5, the regions with higher concentrations of traded sector jobs are the most productive; they generate the most economic output per job. Gross Regional Product (GRP) is the local or regional equivalent of GDP (Gross Domestic Product). GRP is the value of all goods and services produced in an economy. GRP per job is a measure of the productivity of the labor force and firms in the economy – the value of the output created from each worker. ▪ Boulder, CO has the most productive economy with nearly $150,000 in annual output per worker, followed by Fort Collins, CO at $118,000. ▪ Bozeman and Gallatin County are at the lower end of the spectrum of the comparison communities due to the higher concentration of tourism and local serving jobs. These data reinforce the focus of this strategy on diversifying the economy with a focus on traded sectors to provide the economic engine for the region, and local sectors providing the support for quality of life and on-ramps to business ownership and wealth building. Bozeman/Gallatin Highest Industry Location Quotient Concentration Traded Sectors Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1.33 Corvallis/Benton 3.21 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 0.82 Bozeman/Gallatin 0.82 Information 0.63 Boise/Ada 1.14 Management of companies and enterprises 0.24 Boise/Ada 1.05 Professional and technical services 1.20 Boulder/Boulder 2.47 Wholesale trade 0.76 Boise/Ada 1.22 Manufacturing 0.70 Ogden/Weber 1.61 Transportation and warehousing 0.55 Boise/Ada 0.70 Finance and insurance 0.63 Boise/Ada 1.14 Local Sectors Utilities 0.50 Boise/Ada 1.03 Construction 2.09 Bozeman/Gallatin 2.09 Retail trade 1.31 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.31 Real estate and rental and leasing 1.30 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.30 Administrative and waste services 0.62 Boise/Ada 1.38 Educational services 0.72 Boulder/Boulder 0.79 Health care and social assistance 0.72 Missoula/Missoula 1.22 Arts, entertainment, and recreation 1.99 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.99 Accommodation and food services 1.47 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.47 Other services, except public administration 1.39 Missoula/Missoula 1.57 Source: Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[223016-QCEW.xlsx]T-LQ vs Peers 309 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 13 Figure 5. Gross regional product per job, Gallatin County and selected comparison areas INDUSTRY CLUSTERS Industry clusters are groups of similar and related traded sector businesses that share common markets, technologies, and worker skill needs, that are often linked by buyer-seller relationships. Industry clusters represent distinct qualities of a community and help define what makes one community different from another. Industry clusters are a way of communicating, marketing, and leveraging the presence of these concentrations of skills, resources, and relationships. The EVS is organized around supporting seven traded sector clusters and three local sector clusters summarized in Table 4 and Table 5. Appendix A provides a more detailed description of these industry clusters. Table 4. Traded sector industry clusters Estimated Estimated Estimated Industry Cluster Stage Jobs Firms Wages Description Traded Sectors Photonics Mature 800 35 $60,000-$100,000+Science and technology of generating, detecting, and controlling light. Quantum Computing Nascent Less than 100 Less than 20 $60,000-$100,000+Uses atomic motion to perform computing operations. Biotechnology Growing 100 to 400 Not available $40,000-$90,000+Medical and drug research and technology. Software/Information Technology (IT)Mature 1,350 240 $60,000-$140,000+Programming and system design. Outdoor Equipment Mature 500-1,000 Not available $40,000-$90,000+Outdoor equipment design, manufacturing, and marketing. Capitalizes on Bozeman brand. Within manufacturing industry of 3,600 jobs. Speciality Manufacturing Mature 1,000+Not available $40,000-$60,000 Specialty products including metal products, musical instruments, and food and beverage. Within manufacturing industry of 3,600 jobs. Climate Technology Nascent Not available Not available $40,000-$90,000+Emerging cluster of technologies that are explicitly focused on addressing climate change. Wide range of industries. Source: Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[223016 Industry Cluster Definitions (CH).xlsx]T-FinalClusters_Traded 310 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 14 Table 5. Local sector industry clusters NATIONAL TRENDS There are fundamental national issues facing the community that need to be addressed in order to foster economic vitality. EQUITY In the context of economic vitality, equity is defined as an economic system that ensures under- represented and under-served people have the same level of access to the economy and wealth creation as all other residents. Equity is not equality. Equality is sameness or treating everyone the same regardless of identity, life circumstance, or needs. The same resources or services may be available to all, but some people may face barriers in accessing or benefitting from them. Equity recognizes the differences and works to remove the barriers to access opportunity. Photo caption: Equality is when everyone has access to a bicycle. Equity is when everyone is able to benefit from having access to a bicycle because the design of each bicycle meets their unique needs. Estimated Estimated Estimated Industry Cluster Stage Jobs Firms Wages Description Local Sectors Construction Mature 6,400 1,290 $50,000-$60,000 $100,000 in heavy construction Residential and commercial buildings, skilled trades, and heavy/civil engineering construction. Small Business Ownership Growing N/A N/A Varies Small businesses across all sectors. Self employed is 25-30% of all jobs in Gallatin County. Health Care Mature 6,000 500+$40,000-$90,000+Medical services provided through hospitals and small practices. Includes doctors, nurses, and home service providers. Source: Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[223016 Industry Cluster Definitions (CH).xlsx]T-FinalClusters_Local 311 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 15 Wealth Creation Wealth creation is generally attained through career opportunities with living-wages, business ownership and real estate ownership. Income is only one measurement of wealth. Net worth, or wealth, includes income, homes, stock-market investments, businesses, and other owned assets, minus debt. Available data to compare wealth is generally available on a national level and is therefore considered here in that context. Nationally, the net worth of a typical white household is nearly ten times greater than that of a typical Black household, and eight times greater than a Hispanic household. According to a survey by the Federal Reserve in 2017, the median net worth of African-Americans ($17,600) was only a tenth that of non-Hispanic whites ($171,000).2 Furthermore, nearly 20 percent of Black households have zero or negative net worth compared to 14 percent of households identifying as other or multiple race,3 13 percent of Hispanic households, and only nine percent of white households.4 Figure 6: Family Median Net Worth, Thousands of 2016 Dollars Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances As the following chart shows, higher income levels are correlated with educational attainment. However, ensuring parity in college degree attainment alone will not solve the racial disparity in the wealth gap. 2 Recent Trends in Wealth-Holding by Race and Ethnicity: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances, Federal Reserve, September 2017 3 Other families--a diverse group that includes those identifying as Asian, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, other race, and all respondents reporting more than one racial identification. 4 ibid 17.6 20.7 64.8 171 Black or African-American Hispanic or Latino Other or Multiple Race White non-Hispanic 312 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 16 Figure 7: Median Weekly Earnings and Unemployment Rate by Educational Attainment, 2017 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2017 Real estate equity and the transfer of wealth are important determinants of household wealth creation. However, generations of under-represented Americans have had limited access to real estate assets due to discriminatory policies throughout the 20th century including the Jim Crow era’s “Black Codes” strictly limiting opportunity in many southern states, prior to Federal Housing Administration (FHA) lending restrictions,5 and redlining. In addition, research shows that Black-owned real estate is systemically (and historically) devalued, leading to less wealth creation than the same assets for White households.6 Business ownership is another significant (and perhaps the most important) source of wealth creation. In the U.S., approximately 77 percent of wealth created in 2015 came from owning a private company or professional firm.7 Research shows that business ownership is also associated with higher levels of economic mobility.8 And yet, there are significant racial disparities in business ownership rates and business performance (i.e., revenue and profitability) that lead to even more disparities in wealth creation. In the U.S.: “Nationally, people of color represent about 40 percent of the population, but only 20 percent of the nation’s 5.6 million business owners with employees. The U.S. could have millions more businesses if women and minorities became entrepreneurs at the same rate as white men.” 9 Businesses owned by people of color earn just 48 percent of the revenue of white- owned firms.10 5 Rothstein, Richard. Color of Law. 2017 6 Perry, Andre. Know Your Price: Valuing Black Lives and Property in America's Black Cities. 2020 7 Benson, R. (2015). Wealth Creation through Business Ownership. American Business Advisors. 8 Perspectives on Inequality and Opportunity from the Survey of Consumer Finances, Janet Yellen, October 2014 9 Liu, S. & Parilla, J. “Businesses owned by women and minorities have grown. Will COVID-19 undo that?” Brookings. April 14, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/research/businesses-owned-by-women-and-minorities-have-grown-will- covid-19-undo-that/ 10 Zeuli, K., Nijhius, A., Eberhardt, P., O’Shea, K., & Verchot, M. (2018). Helping entrepreneurs of color grow their business: Early insights from the Ascend 2020 initiative. Boston: MA, ICIC. 2015 U.S. Census Bureau Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs data for privately held firms with paid employees. $1,743 1,836 1,401 1,173 836 774 712 520 1.50% 1.5 2.2 2.5 3.4 4 4.6 6.5 Doctoral degree Professional degree Master's degree Bachelor's degree Associate degree Some college, no degree High school diploma, no college Less than a high school diploma Unemployment rate Median usual weekly earnings 313 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 17 In Bozeman, the most recent Survey of Business Owners and Self-Employed Persons (SBO) from the United States Census Bureau was conducted in 2012, at the time Bozeman was estimated to have 7,473 total firms, 26.6 percent of that were owned by women and 0.03 percent that were minority owned. One piece of the wealth gap is income. Data for our city and region has limited reliability because of relatively low population and even lower numbers of people of color. With this in mind, according to American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2015-2019), the City of Bozeman has an average household median income was $55,569. While Asian households had almost twice the average median income, $106,204, White households were slightly above the average at $57,523 and all other households were below the average. Black or African American households made slightly less at $54,375 and American Indian and Alaska Native households made $50,536. Households that selected some other race or Hispanic or Latino origin had the lowest median income, $43,023 for some other race and $33,833 for Hispanic or Latino households.11 Diversity and Inclusion In working toward equity, a community must recognize and respond to the importance of diversity and inclusion. The City of Bozeman has adapted from the Government Alliance on Race & Equity the following definitions of diversity and inclusion. Diversity is the variation and difference across individuals in a group, organization, or community. A group can be described as diverse when it is made up of individuals of varying characteristics. Some examples are race, ethnicity, language-spoken, nationality, cultural identity, spiritual practice, age, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, ability, and income or socioeconomic status. When striving for diversity, residents honor the richness, value, and benefits of bringing people with different perspectives, identities, and experiences together. Inclusion is what is done with diversity. An individual, group, organization, or community is inclusive when differences and variation are leveraged and celebrated. When residents strive for inclusion, they are aware of how words, actions, and beliefs impact others. Inclusive spaces are those in which people are respected, heard, and feel like they belong, even when they hold different identities, experiences, or perspectives from each other. HOUSING AVAILABILITY The median home price in Bozeman is $812,000 as of May 2022 and ended the year 2021 at $700,000, which is the available data for comparison with other cities (Figure 8). Increasing access to available housing is a major priority for residents and business owners across the Valley. The limited availability of homes is driven by three main factors: 1) not enough overall supply; 2) increases in in-migration related to the pandemic and remote working; and 3) the increase in housing costs for new construction. All of these factors increase home prices making them inaccessible for average wage-earners. 11 Equity Indicators Project, Thomas P. Miller and Associates, July 2021 314 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 18 Figure 8. 2021 median home price, Bozeman and selected comparison cities In all interviews with community and business stakeholders, housing costs in Bozeman were identified as the number one concern. The City’s Community Housing Action Plan, adopted in November, 2019 and amended in January, 2020, proactively addresses this significant issue. Additionally, the city has aligned the housing program within the Economic Development Department in response to the State Legislature’s removal of a city’s regulatory authority via inclusionary zoning to increase the number of cost-efficient housing units in a community. The city is currently pursuing an incentive-based approach to achieve additional community housing units. Community housing is critical infrastructure necessary to serve employees, students and residents and maintain a vital economic base. Recommendations in this Economic Vitality Strategy are developed in collaboration with housing program staff and supplement existing work. In order to serve the community and economic base with employees ranging from teachers, doctors and manufacturers, it is important to utilize the existing housing supply for permanent year-round residents. Currently, Bozeman has competing interests for housing between residents, MSU graduate and non-traditional students, and tourists staying in short term rentals. While maximizing the availability of existing housing stock, it is also necessary to decrease the cost of new housing. This can be accomplished by permitting the construction of smaller sizes housing units on smaller property footprints. This approach to a simplified housing unit size requires less construction material, less or more efficient utility infrastructure and encourages a built environment that allows people to walk and bike instead of driving a vehicle when appropriate. All of these outcomes not only reduce the cost of housing, but help mitigate climate change. CLIMATE CHANGE A recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) analysis12 shows that the most severe harms from climate change fall disproportionately upon underserved communities who are least able to prepare for, and recover from, heat waves, poor air quality, flooding, and other impacts. A 12 Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the United States, EPA, September 2021 f 315 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 19 community can proactively address these impacts by: 1) mitigating climate change by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; and 2) becoming resilient in order to quickly adapt to future impacts. Climate change also threatens the natural and recreational assets that are important to the economy – not just the tourism economy but also the quality of life that is attracting traded sector firms. Changing precipitation patterns (warmer, drier), earlier and faster snowpack melt off, more frequent and larger wildfires are all expected to affect the natural environment and quality of life in the Gallatin Valley. Specifically, a less reliable snowpack and a drier climate will affect the winter sports industry and river recreation businesses. Warmer summers will increase river water and air temperatures, the latter requiring additional air conditioning use which in turn demands more energy use and production, creating additional impact if more energy isn’t source from renewables. Mitigation The Bozeman Climate Plan, 2020, identifies how the city can take actions to reduce per-capita GHG emissions. The Plan states that 57 percent of Bozeman’s 2018 emissions came from residential and commercial building energy use, which is the highest source of emissions. Improving building efficiency and increasing renewable energy supply are paramount to achieving the near-term emissions reduction goal. Innovative companies understand the real implications of climate change and are increasingly seeking ways to enhance sustainable practices. Utilizing non-carbon generating energy sources is a strategic advantage for companies seeking to meet environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria used by socially conscious investors to screen potential investments. Collaboration between Gallatin Valley stakeholders and the local utility provider, NorthWestern Energy, to recognize this competitive advantage for ESG financing, or in Montana, Commercial Property Assessed Capital Enhancements (C-PACE), could help shift power generation investments. Resilience The Bozeman Climate Plan (The Plan) calls out a need for improved systems regarding water use and agriculture production. Innovation within the food systems development process presents many opportunities for emission reductions through improved agricultural practices, lower-carbon food products, production and transportation efficiency, and waste reduction. The Plan also encourages the development of a robust local food supply to reduce food insecurity and improve food system resiliency. EARLY LEARNING/CHILD CARE Child care is critical infrastructure for working parents, but it also enables children to be in a setting that promotes their healthy development and school readiness (while their parents work). In this way, child care not only has a direct impact on the economy today, but also impacts the economy of tomorrow. Rigorous evidence from studies of random assignment to high-quality preschool suggests that early childhood policy interventions have wide-ranging long-term impacts.13 Nobel Prize winning University of Chicago Economics Professor James Heckman’s 13 Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach Ryan Nunn Lauren Bauer Megan Mumford Audrey Breitwieser, Seven Facts on Noncognitive Skills from Education to the Labor Market, October 2016 316 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 20 work outlines the great gains to be had by investing in the early and equal development of human potential. He finds that investing in comprehensive birth-to-five early childhood education is a powerful and cost-effective way to mitigate negative consequences on child development and increase adult opportunity. “The gains are significant because quality programs pay for themselves many times over. The cost of inaction is a tragic loss of human and economic potential that we cannot afford.”14 Unfortunately, while wages are stagnating as indicated in Figure 9, the cost of organized child care is increasing and presents a substantial financial hurdle for many working parents with children, especially those working for low wages. Figure 9: US Median Household Income 1967-2016 The cost of care in the Gallatin Valley remains a barrier for many parents seeking to enter or stay in the labor force. The average annual cost of child care in Montana for an infant is $9,096 in a child care center and $7,440 in a family child care home.15 Subsidized child care can encourage low-skilled parents to maintain their connection to the labor force or to upgrade their skills through education, thereby contributing to economic growth and productivity over the longer term. Since 2010, the number of family child care homes in Montana has declined from 2,323 to 1,633 in 2016 – a decline of 29.7 percent. For working families, the decline in home-based care reduces the availability of the least expensive care option for families.16 In addition to the growing demand for child care and an increasing scarcity of affordable facilities, is a need for more workers. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are approximately 330 child care workers in Southwest Montana, which includes Gallatin Valley. With a ratio of 2.41 workers/1,000 people, the talent pool is similar to the national average (LQ: 14 García, Jorge Luis, James J. Heckman, Duncan Ermini Leaf, and María José Prados. “The Life-cycle Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Program.” 2016 15 Montana Fact Sheet 1312019.pdf (ced.org) 16 Ibid 317 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 21 1.0).17 Recruiting qualified workers for this sector is also more difficult due to low wages; the average annual salary is $38,890 – the average national median wage is $49,150.18 Increasing the supply of child care is critical for the economy to maximize the full potential of the available workforce. More importantly, providing early learning is an important investment in communities that help ensure they can realize their human and economic potential. HIGH SCHOOL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT Career technical education (CTE) and science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education are essential for all students, regardless of their aspirations. These studies not only impart important technical skills and knowledge to succeed in a technology-based economy, they also enhance student agency, creativity, critical thinking, problem solving, teamwork, adaptability, and habits of mind and dispositions that make for future success. Most importantly, CTE and STEM education greatly affect learners’ engagement, achievement, and persistence in school. The Bozeman School District is actively supporting students through the Career and Technical Education (CTE) Pathways program that gives BSD7 students opportunities to explore--and even begin--careers while they are still students in the Bozeman School District. The existing CTE Pathways website is intended to: 1) increase student, family, staff, and community awareness of the CTE pathways that begin in the schools and can lead to a variety of post high school degrees, certifications, and job opportunities in our community; and 2) showcase the work-based learning options, certifications, and degrees that are in concert with the established pathways. SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT In developing tactical actions to support small business growth, it is important to recognize that small businesses are not uniform and those in different size categories face different challenges in accessing financing and technical support. Not all small businesses are positioned to scale. As identified by TEConomy Partners, LLC, while most entrepreneurs start by forming small businesses, not all small businesses are entrepreneurial. Small business owners develop companies to generate wealth and provide employment and income for themselves and others. Entrepreneurs are interested in creating innovative products or services that lead to further investment and growth. Understanding the different motivations and needed support services for these two types of businesses is important in developing the strategy and actions. In Montana, 21,334 firms within the state have less than five employees as shown in Figure 10. This amount is 64 percent of the overall firms in the state, which is higher than the U.S. amount of 62 percent shown in Table 7. 17 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes211021.htm 18 Ibid 318 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 22 Figure 10: Firm Size Montana, 2019 Source: Bridge Economic Development, US Census SUSB Historical Data Table 7: Proportion of Firm Size Montana and U.S., 2019 Size of Firm Montana United States <5 employees 64% 62% 5-9 employees 16% 17% 10-19 employees 9% 11% 20-99 employees 7% 9% 100-499 employees 2% 2% 500+ employees 3% 0.34% Source: Bridge Economic Development, US Census SUSB Historical Data The majority of entrepreneurs within the photonics industry emerged from MSU. The original university research and development (R&D) was applied to commercial uses and small businesses were formed. This R&D element that is dependent on graduate students and professors from across the world is vital for growing the industries emerging within Gallatin Valley. Many of the original small businesses have grown into large companies and some have been acquired by global firms. This evolution of R&D to commercialization of new technologies to manufacturing production is a complicated and lengthy process that requires a regional ecosystem of support. Gallatin Valley is fortunate to host an asset such as MSU that is supporting the development of various industry startups as identified below in Figure 11. 21,334 5,282 3,130 2,329 539 942 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 <5 employees 5-9 employees 10-19 employees 20-99 employees 100-499 employees 500+ employees 319 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 23 Figure 11: MSU Industry Startups through 2021 Source: MSU Technology Transfer Office (TTO) 320 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 24 THE ECONOMIC VITALITY STRATEGY The City of Bozeman and regional stakeholders, including Economic Vitality Board members, developed the following Strategy to respond to national trends and leverage unique local assets to foster economic vitality across Gallatin Valley. VISION Outcome of implementing the Strategy: Gallatin Valley is a hub of opportunity, job creation, and exports for Montana where people of all backgrounds, incomes, and identities can live and work. VALUES Guide desired economic development outcomes. We as a city value: Equitable Economic Growth that improves economic mobility, builds wealth and provides equal opportunities for under-represented individuals A Sustainable Economy with varied industries and business sizes including diverse ownership Resilient Infrastructure to endure economic shocks and climate change, which includes areas such as adequate workforce housing, water supply, renewable energy, and multi-modal transportation Engaged Higher Education that supports an entrepreneurial ecosystem and talent pipeline to careers in the Gallatin Valley throughout students’ education Innovation that captures opportunities in emerging technologies and industries including those aligned with national interests (e.g., defense, energy, climate) Fostering a Small Business Hub through a supportive network that generates opportunity for wealth building of under-resourced individuals and retains businesses through succession planning GUIDING PRINCIPLES General guidelines that shape the Strategy actions and implementation: Gallatin Valley Residents that live and work in the community are the focus of the Strategy 321 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 25 Engagement with the State of Montana to help rural areas leverage economic growth in Gallatin Valley Regional Partners are Actively Engaged to effectively implement objectives Clear and Transparent Roles and Lead Organizations are identified to efficiently implement the Strategy Grounded Aspiration to recognize and capture opportunities that are available and realistic for the Gallatin Valley region GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Based on the key findings, values and guiding principles, the City of Bozeman and stakeholders identified the following goals and objectives to guide economic vitality actions implemented by regional stakeholders, which are outlined in a separate Action Matrix document, over the next three to five years. 1) Provide Opportunity for Gallatin Valley Residents Wealth creation provides the opportunity for all local residents to sustainably live in the Gallatin Valley. It is important for four reasons: 1) wealth creation is a safety net that keeps households from being derailed by temporary setbacks and the loss of income; 2) it allows people to take career risks knowing that they have a buffer when success is not guaranteed or immediately achieved; 3) family wealth affords residents to access housing in neighborhoods with good schools, thereby enhancing the upward mobility of their own children; 4) wealth creation affords people opportunities to be entrepreneurs and inventors; and 5) creates inter-generational wealth. Finally, the income from wealth is taxed at much lower rates than income from work, which means that wealth begets more wealth.19 1) Enhance the small business development ecosystem Small business development is an alternative opportunity for people in Gallatin Valley if a traditional career path is not available. They are necessary to commercialize innovation and potentially grow into larger traded sector firms. Focused programs to help support under-represented residents build wealth are essential to foster equity. As a small business hub, Gallatin Valley can provide training for individuals to start businesses in outlying rural communities. Gallatin Valley can leverage the community culture of grit and hard work to innovate new companies and opportunities. 2) Provide comprehensive and coordinated skills development starting with child care through middle school and higher-ed Improving the skills of individuals not only improves the employment base, but also develops future civic and business leaders needed to guide the region. Providing early learning child care is an important community investment, helping to develop the 19 Examining the Black-white wealth gap, Brookings, February 27, 2020 322 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 26 necessary skills that allow a community to realize its human and economic potential.20 This is especially true for underrepresented children. Engaging students in middle school to prepare the future workforce is necessary. Higher-education leaders in can build off this engagement and provide necessary skills development through trades training, one- year certifications, and 2- and 4-year college programs. 3) Improve access to career opportunities for local and surrounding rural residents Gallatin Valley is fortunate to have several diverse traded sector industries that are growing and provide career ladder opportunities with living-wage salaries. With remote work infrastructure and training in rural communities, they can access “rural onshoring” opportunities within Gallatin Valley. There is a demand for construction and specialty manufacturing occupations that offer alternative job opportunities without a four-year college degree. Building a clear path and educating youth about these opportunities is important to keep them living and working in Gallatin Valley. 2) Support a Diverse Economy Economic vitality for individuals requires a resilient economy that can withstand economic shocks as witnessed during the pandemic. A resilient economy is diverse in business size as well as industry types. Various businesses provide diverse services and products and enable innovation of new products. Larger traded sector companies offer individuals careers with stability and benefits and an employment base to support local sector companies. Meanwhile, local sector companies can serve as a gateway for underrepresented people to build a business and wealth. 1) Focus on traded sector industries that are emerging and can increase exports To maximize limited resources, stakeholders should focus efforts on emerging traded industries to foster growth of a diverse industry base. MSU research and development (R&D) is actively supported by the Technology Transfer Office (TTO) to develop entrepreneurs offering innovative solutions. Many of the innovations emerging from MSU specifically align with federal interests associated with energy, climate change and defense, which are more likely to receive grants and funding. 2) Enhance development of the talent pipeline The top priority of businesses within any industry cluster is access to good talent. The education and development of students at MSU and Gallatin College are critical for the economy. It is also important for the institutions to introduce students to local career opportunities so that they are more inclined to stay and access economic opportunities in Gallatin Valley and contribute to the growth of the local economy. 20 The anatomy of inequality: Florian Hoffman discusses how income disparities have grown in the US and Europe over the last 40 years, American Economic Association, November 25, 2020 323 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 27 3) Build a More Resilient Region Resilience and economic growth are both vital for healthy economies in uncertain times. If a local economy is resilient, the recovery period will be much shorter than an economy with little or no resilience. If a local economy is not resilient, it may never return to its former economic growth path. Places that recovered from the 2008-2009 Great Recession included regions with high educational attainment, a diverse and adaptable workforce, attainable housing prices and rents, ongoing capital investment indicating the availability of significant public resources, and those that are not dependent on the cyclical nature of a single industry. The recent pandemic and climate change impacts reveal that disasters disproportionately impact our most vulnerable populations. Regions will need to address those left behind and hit the hardest before they can jump forward. 1) Increase amount and access to housing for all The most significant concern for every business owner is the lack of housing supply and affordability. The Gallatin Valley economy will become less resilient and struggle to grow without a housing supply that serves all incomes. 2) Develop a sustainable city Government does not create jobs; it creates a great environment to attract and retain businesses that create jobs. Companies are seeking to invest in sustainable and resilient communities that provide a good return on investment. The City of Bozeman should continue to build innovative infrastructure to develop sustainably and provide certainty to investors. The city can foster a culture of resilience and efficiency to help bounce back from environmental impacts (e.g., wildfires, limited water supply). 3) Foster a culture focused on climate change resilience Over the past seven years, total funding for climate technology (tech) companies, rate of startup creation, and the average size of funding has continued to rise. Total venture funding increased to US$87.5bn invested over second half of 2020 and first half of 2021, a more than 210 percent increase.21 Young talent is increasingly seeking jobs that focus on addressing climate change. Gallatin Valley can position itself as an innovator in climate tech in collaboration with high-tech and natural resource production (e.g., agriculture, ranching) to foster collaboration across the state. 21 State of Climate Tech 2021: Scaling breakthroughs for net zero, PWC 324 Bozeman Economic Vitality Strategy | October 2022 28 ACTION MATRIX The Action Matrix (Attachment B) delineates actions to implement the Strategy goals and objectives. Multiple stakeholders and organizations contribute to the actions as one organization alone cannot implement the strategy. Regional ownership is established by identifying Lead Organizations that champion and guide implementation. The Matrix is a flexible tool that allows for the introduction of new actions over the years if they align with the strategy objectives and are represented by a Lead Organization. EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Metrics serve three purposes: 1) measure progress towards outcomes, 2) determine if the actions are meeting the plan’s defined objectives (impact), and 3) allow for transparent communication on progress and impact to the broader community. Outcomes: Within the Action Matrix, each objective has an associated outcome to determine if the desired impact is achieved. The outcomes are measurable and where applicable, define metrics for under-represented individuals to assess if equitable outcomes are achieved. Benchmarks: At a broader community level, key benchmarks can be tracked and reported annually to communicate both progress and impact. It will take several years to improve the statistics but tracking progress will show that the region is maintaining a vital focus on the long- term goals. Annual reporting of the benchmarks will help maintain stakeholder engagement throughout the implementation process. Benchmarks should be compared annually with peer regions to provide a stronger context for the region. 325 ATTACHMENT A 326 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.The Economics of Land Use ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT City of Bozeman Economic Development Strategic Plan March 2022Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Prepared by: 327 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.Summary of Findings ……………………………………………………………………2 2.Community Profile ………………………………………………………………………. 8 3.Economy …………………………………………………………………………………………11 4.Industry Clusters ………………………………………………………………………… 20 5.Economic Equity …………………………………………………………………………22 Appendix …………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 328 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |2 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Introduction and Purpose This economic assessment describes the economy and demographics of Bozeman and Gallatin County. The information is intended to inform participants in the Economic Development Strategic Plan process. The analysis also compares Bozeman and Gallatin County to several comparison communities that Bozeman sometimes competes with for economic development. Regional Economy The economy of Bozeman, Gallatin County and the Gallatin Valley (Greater Bozeman) are closely related. About half of the jobs in the County are in Bozeman, and a large majority of the jobs are in the Gallatin Valley comprised of Bozeman, Gallatin Gateway, Four Corners, Belgrade, and Manhattan. While this plan is being prepared by the City of Bozeman, it is anticipated to result in regional partnerships to carry it forward. The success of each community in the region contributes to the overall economic vitality because of their proximity, single labor force, and economic relationships. 329 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |3 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Economy and Trends Growth –Bozeman is growing rapidly with 3.8% annual population growth (+6,400 people 2015-2019) and 2.5% annual job growth (+6,900 jobs 2015-2019). The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the appeal of high-amenity places for remote and knowledge workers and firms which is contributing to these trends. Economic base –Bozeman’s economy is most heavily concentrated in tourism and retail type jobs (tourism and local sectors) that have lower wages than traded sector jobs. Economic evolution –Bozeman and Gallatin County are experiencing strong growth in knowledge-based industries (professional and technical services) and in manufacturing. These trends can be leveraged to further diversify the economy and raise average wages. Wages –Tight labor supply conditions and a rising cost of living have resulted in 5.4% annual wage growth across all industries. Knowledge based industries had wage growth in the 7 to 8% range annually which suggests that the area is attracting high value talent and that the composition of firms is changing. Labor force –The labor supply is extremely tight with 1.1% unemployment (4.0 to 5.0% is considered healthy). The labor shortage may moderate as people reenter the labor force as the pandemic stabilizes. Access to housing (high costs, limited supply) is also a contributing factor. 330 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |4 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Industry Clusters Industry clusters are groups of similar and related businesses that share common markets, technologies, worker skill needs, and which are often linked by buyer-seller relationships. Industry clusters represent distinct qualities of a community and help define what makes one community different from another. The Economic Development Strategy is likely to recommend a focus on traded sector industry clusters due to their higher economic impact than local sectors. The table shows the industry sectors according to the National Industrial Classification System (NAICS) that align with the specific industry clusters. Industry Sector (NAICS)Industry Cluster Private Wage and Salary Jobs (Gallatin County) Traded Sectors Manufacturing •Photonics•Outdoor equipment •Biotechnology •Niche manufacturing 3,600 Professional and technical services •Photonics •Quantum computing•Technology / IT•Biotechnology 4,800 Total 8,400 Local Sectors Health Care •Health care 6,000 Construction •Residential and nonresidential construction and trades•Heavy civil construction 6,400 Arts, entertainment, and recreation •Outdoor industry (ski areas, guide/tour services 1,700 Retail, accommodations and food services •Retail, restaurants, hotels 17,000 Total 31,100 331 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |5 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Factor Implications Strengths/Opportunities Rapid population and job growth •Market supports investment. •Need to keep up with housing demand. Bozeman brand and quality of life •Attracts companies and workers that share that identity. •May be exacerbating housing costs and inequalities. Growth in more diverse sectors (professional services, manufacturing)•Bozeman becoming established as a location for knowledge based and high value manufacturing industries. •Need to ensure current residents have pathways into these careers. MSU is classified as an R1 Doctoral University (very high research activity), the top research activity classification •Technology transfer and entrepreneurship opportunities from MSU faculty, staff, and graduates. Weaknesses/Threats Large portion of jobs in tourism, retail, and food and beverage industries •Lower wages, less economic productivity, mismatch between wages and housing costs. Rapid increase in housing and real estate costs •Will constrain labor force availability. •May constrain business expansion or relocation (cost of space). Education and opportunity gap between white and non-white population •Invest in career paths into higher paying jobs. 332 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |6 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Comparison Communities The consultant team and City staff developed a list of comparison areas to benchmark Bozeman and Gallatin County against. First, the comparison communities have a major university. Second, they are communities that Bozeman competes with for new company site selection. Missoula, MT –in Missoula County, Montana. Missoula has a population of 76,713 and is the home of the University of Montana, which has an enrollment of 10,015 students. Missoula County’s largest employment industries include Health Care, Retail Trade, and Accommodations and Food Services. Fort Collins, CO –Located in Larimer County, Colorado. Fort Collins has a population of 173,035 and is the home of Colorado State University, which has an enrollment of 32,646 students. Larimer County’s largest employment industries include Retail Trade, Health Care, and Accommodations and Food Services. Boulder, CO –Located in Boulder County, Colorado. Boulder has a population of 105,479 and is the home of the University of Colorado Boulder, which has an enrollment of 34,975 students. Boulder County’s largest employment industries include Professional and Technical Services, Health Care, and Manufacturing. Bend, OR –Located in Deschutes County, Oregon. Bend has a population of 97,283 and is the home of Oregon State University–Cascades, which has an enrollment of 1,374 students. Deschutes County’s largest employment industries include Health Care, Retail Trade, and Accommodations and Food Services. Ogden, UT –Located in Weber County, Utah. Ogden has a population of 89,694 and is the home of Weber State University, which has an enrollment of 29,596 students. Weber County’s largest employment industries include Manufacturing, Health Care, and Retail Trade. Boise, ID –Located in Ada County, Idaho. Boise has a population of 240,333 and is the home of Boise State University, which has an enrollment of 24,103 students. Ada County’s largest employment industries include Health Care, Retail Trade, and Administration and Waste Services. 333 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |7 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS How do we compare? Measure* Indicates City only metric; other metrics are County Bozeman/ Gallatin County Missoula/ Missoula County Fort Collins/ Larimer County Boulder/ Boulder County Bend/ Deschutes County Ogden/ Weber County Boise/ Ada County Population* (2021)51,405 76,713 173,035 105,479 97,283 89,694 240,333 Population Annual Growth Rate (5 years)* (2010-2021) 2.9%1.2%1.6%0.7%2.2%0.7%1.3% Jobs 59,022 58,735 158,006 179,056 81,429 107,658 250,270 Annual Job Growth Rate (2015-2020)2.5%0.5%1.4%0.7%2.4%1.7%2.9% Largest 3 industries (2020)Retail Trade Accomm.Construction Health Care Retail Trade Accomm. Retail Trade Health CareAccomm. Prof. & Tech. Svcs. Health Care Manufacturing Health Care Retail Trade Accomm. Manufacturing Health Care Retail Trade Health CareRetail Trade Admin.& Waste Svcs. Average Annual Wage (2020)$51,400 $47,469 $58,425 $78,383 $52,936 $46,698 $56,192 Gross Regional Product (Output) per Job (2020)$95,912 $84,341 $117,875 $148,666 $112,162 $98,984 $103,445 % Bachelor’s Degree or Higher* (2019)59%48%55%76%44%21%42% Median Home Price* (Dec. 2021)$700,000 $517,497 $534,978 $940,000 $683,000 $360,000 $554,933 % White-Non Hispanic/ All Other Races* (2019)92% / 8%91% / 9%88% / 12%87% / 13%93% / 7%84% / 16%89% / 11% 334 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |8 2. COMMUNITY PROFILE Population and Growth Rates Why we measure Population growth comes from job growth, in- migration, and natural increase (births and deaths). It is a broad indicator of economic vitality, the appeal of a place, and community change and evolution. Population growth also drives demand for housing. Key Findings Bozeman had the fastest population growth rate among the comparison communities, at 2.9% per year. The City added 14,051 people from 2010-2021. Bend, OR was the second fastest growing at 2.2% per year. Fort Collins, Boise, and Missoula are growing at a more moderate pace of 1.2 to 1.6% per year. Bozeman surpassed 50,000 population which is a threshold that makes the City eligible for new federal funding sources. The official population estimates from the US Census Redistricting process is 53,293. Description 2010 2021 Total Ann. #Ann. % Population Bozeman 37,354 51,405 14,051 1,277 2.9% Bend 76,652 97,283 20,631 1,876 2.2% Fort Collins 144,693 173,035 28,342 2,577 1.6% Boise 208,726 240,333 31,607 2,873 1.3% Missoula 67,533 76,713 9,180 835 1.2% Ogden 82,905 89,694 6,789 617 0.7% Boulder 97,968 105,479 7,511 683 0.7% Households Bozeman 15,777 22,051 6,274 570 3.1% Bend 31,795 40,021 8,226 748 2.1% Fort Collins 58,113 69,655 11,542 1,049 1.7% Boise 86,978 102,110 15,132 1,376 1.5% Missoula 29,406 33,965 4,559 414 1.3% Ogden 29,667 32,338 2,671 243 0.8% Boulder 41,522 44,389 2,867 261 0.6% Source: ESRI; Economic & Planning Systems 2010-2021 335 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |9 2. COMMUNITY PROFILE Total Jobs and Growth Rates Why we measure Job growth is an indicator of the strength of an economy. Jobs are created from the growth of existing businesses, and new business formation and entrepreneurship. The best employment data is only available at the county level. Most of the economic analysis that follows is for the counties in which the comparison communities are located. Key Findings Jobs in Gallatin County grew at a 2.5% annual rate, the second-highest of the comparison areas. The County added nearly 7,000 jobs between 2015 and 2020. Population in Gallatin County is growing faster than jobs. Possible explanations include: –In-migration is not tied to a local job (e.g., remote workers, retirees) –Jobs of new residents are recorded elsewhere Ada County (Boise) had the fastest job growth at 2.9% per year. Deschutes County (Bend) was slightly behind Bozeman at 2.4% per year. Description County 2015 2020 Total Ann. #Ann. % Total, All Industries Boise Ada 216,678 250,270 33,592 6,718 2.9% Bozeman Gallatin 52,059 59,022 6,963 1,393 2.5% Bend Deschutes 72,423 81,429 9,006 1,801 2.4% Ogden Weber 98,729 107,658 8,929 1,786 1.7% Fort Collins Larimer 147,455 158,006 10,551 2,110 1.4% Boulder Boulder 172,735 179,056 6,321 1,264 0.7% Missoula Missoula 57,337 58,735 1,398 280 0.5% Source: QCEW; Economic & Planning Systems 2015-2020 336 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |10 2. COMMUNITY PROFILE Universities Universities are centers of research and innovation. They spin off entrepreneurs, technology, and ideas that support jobs and innovation in the local economy. Universities are also major employers on their own. The student population also influences the housing and retail markets in their host communities. Research Classification There are 146 institutions classified as “R1: Doctoral Universities –Very High Research Activity” as of 2021. This status indicates a high level of research activity per capita. Of the peer communities, only Montana State University, University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado State University, and the University of Montana share this status. Description Boulder Ogden Bozeman Fort Collins Missoula Boise Bend Major Colleges/Universities University of Colorado Weber State University Montana State University Colorado State University University of Montana Boise State University Oregon State University Research Classification R1-Very High Research Activity ---R1-Very High Research Activity R1-Very High Research Activity R1-Very High Research Activity R2-High Research Activity --- Enrollment (Fall 2020)34,975 29,596 16,249 32,646 10,015 24,103 1,374 % of Total Population 33.2%33.0%31.6%18.9%13.1%10.0%1.4% Source: Economic & Planning Systems 337 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |11 3. ECONOMY Jobs by Industry, 2020 Why we measure The types of jobs in an economy influence demographic factors such as household income and education levels. Available job types affect economic mobility and career opportunities as well. The economic mix also affects the built environment and real estate markets –the types of buildings and housing that are in demand. Key Findings The largest industries in Bozeman and Gallatin County are: –Retail trade –Hotels and restaurants –Construction –Health care –Professional and technical services –Manufacturing Greater Bozeman is a gateway to Yellowstone National Park and other outdoor recreation assets that attract national and international visitors. Tourism and retail sectors are therefore a large part of the economy. Note: these figures are private wage and salary jobs and do not include state and federal government or MSU jobs. State and local government employs approximately 10,700 people in Gallatin County including about 4,200 faculty and staff at MSU. 338 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |12 3. ECONOMY Definitions: Traded and Local Sectors Traded Sector Traded sectors export goods and services and bring new money into the economy. This injection of new money helps support local traded sector businesses. Traded sector jobs also tend to have higher wages and larger multiplier effects (spinoff or indirect impacts) than local sectors. Manufacturing and knowledge- based industries are among the traded sectors in the Gallatin Valley. Local Sectors Local sectors are generally goods and services needed by local residents. Local sectors include retail stores, restaurants, health care, personal care services, and repair and maintenance services. There are entrepreneurship and business ownership opportunities in many local sectors with lower barriers to entry compared to traded sectors, making them a good “on ramp” for opportunity. Local sectors tend to have lower wages in comparison to traded sectors. Role of Tourism Since tourism is an important part of the economy, some local sectors are also exports because they serve visitors and second homeowners. These include hotels, restaurants and retail, property management, construction, and outdoor recreation. 339 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |13 3. ECONOMY Change in Jobs 2015-2020 Why we measure The change in jobs by industry is a forward-looking indicator of where the economy is trending. These data can inform strategies on which industries to support for growth or to prevent or manage decline. Key Findings Construction is booming as Greater Bozeman grows and major resort projects are underway in Big Sky. Professional and technical services had the most growth outside of construction. This is a significant change and shows that companies in Greater Bozeman are expanding, and new firms are being formed or attracted. The area is attracting knowledge-based companies and workers. Manufacturing also had significant growth which is rare in small metro areas. Manufacturing is a diverse and important sector in Greater Bozeman. Health care also grew significantly, which is consistent with national trends. People are living longer, more people have health insurance, and the large baby boomer population is aging and increasing health care demand. 340 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |14 3. ECONOMY Location Quotients Why we measure A location quotient (LQ) measures the concentration of an industry in an area compared to the U.S. It is a ratio calculated as the percentage of jobs in the analysis area divided by the percentage in the U.S. From this we can compare the concentrations of industries across different areas and asses local industry strengths or specializations. How to interpret: “Construction jobs in Gallatin County are 2.09 times more concentrated than the U.S. average.” Key Findings Bozeman has lower concentrations in most traded sectors than the comparison communities and higher concentrations in local sectors. As larger cities/metros, Boulder and Boise have more diverse economies. Boulder and Boise/Ada County have higher concentrations of jobs in knowledge and financial industries. Ogden, UT/Weber County has more than twice the manufacturing concentration than Bozeman (aerospace, defense, outdoor products, advanced materials) Boulder and Fort Collins also have higher concentrations of manufacturing at 1.29 and 1.02. Bozeman/Gallatin Highest Industry Location Quotient Concentration Traded Sectors Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1.33 Corvallis/Benton 3.21 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 0.82 Bozeman/Gallatin 0.82 Information 0.63 Boise/Ada 1.14 Management of companies and enterprises 0.24 Boise/Ada 1.05 Professional and technical services 1.20 Boulder/Boulder 2.47 Wholesale trade 0.76 Boise/Ada 1.22 Manufacturing 0.70 Ogden/Weber 1.61 Transportation and warehousing 0.55 Boise/Ada 0.70 Finance and insurance 0.63 Boise/Ada 1.14 Local Sectors Utilities 0.50 Boise/Ada 1.03 Construction 2.09 Bozeman/Gallatin 2.09 Retail trade 1.31 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.31 Real estate and rental and leasing 1.30 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.30 Administrative and waste services 0.62 Boise/Ada 1.38 Educational services 0.72 Boulder/Boulder 0.79 Health care and social assistance 0.72 Missoula/Missoula 1.22 Arts, entertainment, and recreation 1.99 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.99 Accommodation and food services 1.47 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.47 Other services, except public administration 1.39 Missoula/Missoula 1.57 Source: Economic & Planning Systems Z:\Shared\Projects\DEN\223016-Bozeman MT Economic Development Strategy\Data\[223016-QCEW.xlsx]T-LQ vs Peers 341 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |15 3. ECONOMY Wages by Industry Why we measure The wage earned by a worker translates directly to their income, ability to support family members, pay for housing, and invest in education and/or retirement. Wages in an industry are also an indicator of the value creation and worker skills in that industry. Higher paying jobs typically require more education and training, which can be a barrier to low-income populations and people of color. Key Findings There are more jobs with lower wages than there are with higher wages, which is a typical pattern. Tourism and local sectors have lower wages than traded or economic base sectors. The average wage in retail is $40,100 ($19.27/hr) and $26,600 ($12.78) in hotel and restaurant jobs (not including tips). In comparison, the average annual wage for professional and technical services is $79,200 ($38.08/hr). 342 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |16 3. ECONOMY Change in Wages by Industry Why we measure At the industry level wages change due to a variety of factors such as competition for workers and talent (labor supply) and changes in the mix of companies and products within an industry. Key Findings Greater Bozeman has experienced strong wage growth likely due to a tight labor supply and rising cost of a living. Wages grew at an average of 5.4% per year. Some of the highest wage growth was in information, finance/insurance, and professional and technical services. This suggests that: –There is competition for talent –Bozeman is attracting higher value service firms and employees –The economy is evolving and producing higher value services and products Local and tourism sectors also had strong wage growth indicating a tight supply of labor and more leverage for workers to command higher wages. Industry 2015 2020 % Change Growth Rate % of Jobs Economic Base/Traded Sectors Ag./Forest/Hunting $33,800 $46,300 37.0%6.5%1.5%Mining $74,900 $86,500 15.5%2.9%0.3% Utilities D D D D 0.0% Manufacturing $41,500 $53,500 28.9%5.2%7.1%Wholesale Trade $56,100 $68,100 21.4%4.0%3.4%Transport./Warehousing $33,500 $45,200 34.9%6.2%2.5% Information $56,500 $82,400 45.8%7.8%1.3% Finance/Insurance $63,400 $89,800 41.6%7.2%3.1%Prof. & Tech Services $66,700 $87,500 31.2%5.6%9.2%Mgmt. of Companies $60,100 $74,700 24.3%4.4%0.4% Admin/Waste Mgmt $32,400 $39,000 20.4%3.8%4.4% Subtotal 33.3% Local Sectors Construction $46,900 $59,900 27.7%5.0%12.4%Retail Trade $29,300 $38,000 29.7%5.3%16.2% Real Estate $34,800 $50,900 46.3%7.9%2.4% Education $25,900 $36,000 39.0%6.8%1.7%Health Care $44,900 $56,100 24.9%4.6%11.8%Arts/Rec $25,800 $28,700 11.2%2.2%3.0% Hotel/Restaurant $18,300 $24,300 32.8%5.8%14.8% Other $30,100 $39,400 30.9%5.5%4.5%Subtotal 66.7% Overall Averages $39,600 $51,400 29.8%5.4%100.0% Note: "D" indicates not disclosed for privacy requirements. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW; Economic & Planning Systems Change in WagesWages 343 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |17 3. ECONOMY Unemployment Rate Why we measure The unemployment rate measures the supply and demand relationship between employers and workers. When unemployment is high, there are not enough jobs for people in the labor force and visa versa. It is another good indicator of the health of an economy. However low unemployment is an indicator of labor shortages and can lead to inflation and constrain business growth. Key Findings Unemployment rates are at historic lows nationally due to a drop in labor force participation related to the Pandemic. Bozeman has the lowest unemployment rate of the comparison communities at 1.1%, which is not sustainable. Economists generally view a “healthy” unemployment rate as 4.0 to 5.0%. The unemployment rate is expected to rise if more people reenter the labor force as the pandemic stabilizes, and if wages increase to create enough incentive. 344 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |18 3. ECONOMY Gross Regional Product (GRP) per Job Why we measure Gross Regional Product (GRP) is the local or regional equivalent of GDP (Gross Domestic Product). GRP is the value of all goods and services produced in an economy. GRP per job is a measure of the productivity of the labor force and firms in the economy –the value of the output created from each worker. Key Findings Boulder, CO has the most productive economy with nearly $150,000 in annual output per worker, followed by Fort Collins, CO at $118,000. Bozeman and Gallatin County are at the lower end of the spectrum of the comparison communities due to the higher concentration of tourism and local serving jobs. 345 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |19 3. ECONOMY Technology Transfer Awards Why we measure The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs are highly competitive federal research funds designed to stimulate R&D and technological innovation for small businesses. STTR/SBIR programs and funding are an indicator of innovation among small businesses in communities. Key Findings Boulder, CO was awarded the most SBIR and STTR funding, with $242 million, or $4,009 per employee since 2015. Bozeman received the second-most funding per employee of the peer communities. Bozeman has a large concentration of R&D and tech-centric businesses that are catalyzed by MSU’s Tech Transfer Office and MilTech, which help commercialize and provide a gateway for industry partners to access MSU technology. 346 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |20 4. INDUSTRY CLUSTERS Definition Industry clusters are groups of similar and related businesses that share common markets, technologies, worker skill needs, and that are often linked by buyer-seller relationships. Industry clusters represent distinct qualities of a community and help define what makes one community different from another. As they convey distinct qualities, it is important to be specific in the definition of a cluster. For example, rather than promoting “high-tech,” a community should focus on “software or photonics” to convey the type of product being manufactured and its unique workforce and supply chain needs. The Economic Development Strategy is likely to recommend a focus on traded sector industries in terms of the City’s role and investment of resources. Traded sectors industries have higher wages and greater economic impact than local sectors. The table shows the industry sectors according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) that align with the specific industry clusters. Industry Sector (NAICS)Industry Cluster Private Wage and Salary Jobs (Gallatin County) Traded Sectors Manufacturing •Photonics•Outdoor equipment and clothing •Biotechnology•Niche manufacturing 3,600 Professional and technical services •Photonics •Quantum computing•Technology / IT•Biotechnology 4,800 Total 8,400 Local Sectors Health Care •Health care 6,000 Construction •Residential and nonresidential construction and trades•Heavy civil construction 6,400 Arts, entertainment, and recreation •Outdoor industry (ski areas, guide/tour services 1,700 Retail, accommodations and food services •Retail, restaurants, hotels 17,000 Total 31,100 347 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |21 4. INDUSTRY CLUSTERS Traded Sector Industry Clusters Photonics –The science and technology of generating, detecting, and controlling light. It has numerous everyday consumer and industrial applications. Photonics companies were created from MSU grads and related R&D programs. There are at least 35 companies and 800 jobs in Photonics. Biotechnology –Biotechnology includes medical and drug research and manufacturing. The cluster is oriented around MSU R&D and numerous startup companies in the Gallatin Valley. The area’s strength is in the R&D, trial, and identifying commercial use stages of biotech. Quantum computing –Quantum computing uses atomic motion to perform computing operations. It is a major national security and technology priority. MSU has received $20M in federal grants to expand quantum research. There are relationships with the local photonics cluster in quantum research as well. Technology / IT –The Gallatin Valley has a thriving and growing segment of technology (programming and information technology) companies stemming from spinoffs from RightNow Technologies, Oracle, and Bozeman’s quality of life that attracts startup entrepreneurs and venture capital. Outdoor equipment –Bozeman is known throughout the U.S. as an outdoor recreation destination. It also attracts Outdoor companies that capitalize on the Bozeman brand and identity. Companies such as Simms Fishing, Oboz Shoes, Mystery Ranch (formerly Dana Design), Spark R&D and numerous smaller companies are in the Gallatin Valley. Manufacturing and niche products –Manufacturing is a diverse sector in the Gallatin Valley. Products made here include electronic components, metal products, musical instruments, food and beverages, and wood products and building materials. 348 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |22 5. ECONOMIC EQUITY Self Sufficiency Wage Why we measure The federal poverty definition only accounts for a basic food budget and does not include other costs such as childcare and housing. The MIT Living Wage calculator estimates the wage needed for a household to afford food, childcare, health insurance, housing, transportation, and basic necessities (clothing, hygiene items). As stated in its definitions, the “living wage is the minimum income standard that, if met, draws a very fine line between the financial independence of the working poor and the need to seek out public assistance or suffer consistent and severe housing and food insecurity.” The MIT Living Wage calculator estimates the living wage in Gallatin County at $21.68 for a family of four with two working adults and two children. The chart shows the percentage of jobs in each county that are above the self sufficiency wage. Key Findings Due to the high cost of housing and large concentration of tourism and local sector jobs, Bozeman and Gallatin County are at the bottom of the comparison communities with the lowest percentage of jobs above the self sufficiency threshold. 349 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |23 5. ECONOMIC EQUITY Race and Ethnicity Why we measure Looking at the racial composition of a place helps us evaluated the presence of disparities in economic opportunity by race. There are persistent gaps between income, wealth, and education between non-Hispanic whites and people of color and white Hispanic and Latinx people. Key Findings The white non-Hispanic population comprises 92% of the population of Bozeman, which is similar to most of the comparison communities. Larger cities within larger metro areas such as Ogden and Boulder have slightly more diverse populations. 350 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |24 5. ECONOMIC EQUITY Business Owner Demographics Why we measure Looking at the racial composition of business owners helps to further evaluate the presence of disparities in economic opportunity and wealth building by race. Key Findings From the data, there do not appear to be significant differences between the racial and ethnic composition of business owners and the overall population in Bozeman or in the comparison communities. A caveat is that there is a margin of error in these data, and people of color may be underrepresented in Census data. 351 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |25 5. ECONOMIC EQUITY Educational Attainment Why we measure Comparing the level of education achieved to the overall population is another indicator of disparities in economic opportunity and wealth building. Key Findings Boulder is the most highly educated community. Bozeman and Fort Collins have similar levels of education with about 60% of the population having a Bachelor’s degree or higher. Ogden, Utah has the lowest levels of education. There are differences in educational attainment by race and ethnicity in each community. Boulder, Bozeman, and Fort Collins have the highest educational disparities. In Boulder, white non-Hispanics are about 1.44 times more likely to have a college degree or higher and 1.36 times more likely in Bozeman. The disparity in educational attainment is partly explained by the presence of large universities, particularly in Boulder, Bozeman, and Fort Collins. The predominately white faculty in each case increases the number of white advanced degree holders in the community. DI: Disparity Index (%White Non-Hispanic/% All Other) 352 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |26 5. ECONOMIC EQUITY Housing Costs and Access Why we measure Housing costs are a large factor in quality of life, access to home ownership, wealth building, and labor force attraction and retention. High housing costs and low supply can constrain economic growth when the labor force cannot find adequate housing. A person or household is “cost burdened” when they are paying more than 30% of their income towards rent or mortgage payments. Key Findings In Bozeman, 54% or renters are cost burdened making it the third most unaffordable city for renters of the comparison communities. Boulder and Fort Collins are even less affordable for renters while Boise and Ogden are more affordable with a lower percentage of cost burdened renters and owners. Bozeman has the second highest median home price at about $700,000, second only to Boulder at $940,000. Home prices in Bozeman have increased at alarming rates due to strong job and in-migration of wealth, and a housing supply that has not kept up. 353 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |27 5. ECONOMIC EQUITY Relating Wages to Home Prices Why we measure Wages are the primary source of household income for working people. In a balanced housing market, home prices are related to wages and local household incomes. Bozeman however has a complex housing market influenced by the influx of remote workers, second homeowners, early retirees, and a smaller pool of builders than larger metro area markets. The supply has not been able to keep up with demand as exhibited by the rapidly rising home prices. These influences have detached home prices from local wages. Key Findings Towards the end of 2021, the median home price in the city was about $700,000, which required an annual income of approximately $162,000 to afford and is 220% of area median income (AMI). The table on the next page shows average wages for each major industry. For a household with one earner, the average wage is equivalent to the household income. The table also shows the household income if there are 1.5 (one full one half time) or 2.0 workers in the household earning the same wage. The green shaded cells show the incomes and industries that pay enough to afford the median home price. Only in the highest paying industries with two earners is the median home price affordable. 354 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |28 5. ECONOMIC EQUITY Relating Wages to Home Prices Income needed to afford $700,000: $162,000 (220% of AMI Description Ann. Income % AMI Ann. Income % AMI Ann. Income % AMI Area Median Income $62,250 $88,900 $88,900 1-person household 4-person household 4-person household Traded Sectors Ag./Forest/Hunting $46,300 74.4%$69,450 78.1%$92,600 104.2% Mining $86,500 139.0%$129,750 146.0%$173,000 194.6% Utilities D N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Manufacturing $53,500 85.9%$80,250 90.3%$107,000 120.4% Wholesale Trade $68,100 109.4%$102,150 114.9%$136,200 153.2% Transport./Warehousing $45,200 72.6%$67,800 76.3%$90,400 101.7% Information $82,400 132.4%$123,600 139.0%$164,800 185.4% Finance/Insurance $89,800 144.3%$134,700 151.5%$179,600 202.0% Prof. & Tech Services $87,500 140.6%$131,250 147.6%$175,000 196.9% Mgmt. of Companies $74,700 120.0%$112,050 126.0%$149,400 168.1% Admin/Waste Mgmt $39,000 62.7%$58,500 65.8%$78,000 87.7% Local Sectors Construction $59,900 96.2%$89,850 101.1%$119,800 134.8% Retail Trade $38,000 61.0%$57,000 64.1%$76,000 85.5% Real Estate $50,900 81.8%$76,350 85.9%$101,800 114.5% Education $36,000 57.8%$54,000 60.7%$72,000 81.0% Health Care $56,100 90.1%$84,150 94.7%$112,200 126.2% Arts/Rec $28,700 46.1%$43,050 48.4%$57,400 64.6% Hotel/Restaurant $24,300 39.0%$36,450 41.0%$48,600 54.7% Other $39,400 63.3%$59,100 66.5%$78,800 88.6% Public Admin D N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Unclassified D N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Source: Economic & Planning Systems 1-Earner 1-Person Household 1.5-Earner 4-Person Household 2-Earner 4-Person Household 355 APPENDIX 356 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |30 APPENDIX: BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES 357 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |31 APPENDIX: PHOTONICS COMPANIES 358 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |32 APPENDIX: SOFTWARE COMPANIES 359 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |33 APPENDIX: DETAILED LOCATION QUOTIENTS Bozeman Boulder Boise Corvallis Bend Fort Collins Missoula Ogden Highest Location Industry Gallatin Boulder Ada Benton Deschutes Larimer Missoula Weber Concentration Quotient Traded Sectors Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1.33 0.38 0.33 3.21 1.12 0.67 1.00 0.43 Corvallis/Benton 3.21 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 0.82 0.25 0.17 0.14 0.21 0.79 0.15 0.10 Bozeman/Gallatin 0.82 Information 0.63 0.53 1.14 0.44 0.59 0.49 0.80 1.09 Boise/Ada 1.14 Management of companies and enterprises 0.24 0.54 1.05 0.00 0.73 0.39 0.26 0.24 Boise/Ada 1.05 Professional and technical services 1.20 2.47 1.01 0.92 0.83 1.04 0.91 0.67 Boulder/Boulder 2.47 Wholesale trade 0.76 0.90 1.22 0.00 0.66 0.81 0.85 0.90 Boise/Ada 1.22 Manufacturing 0.70 1.29 0.78 0.91 0.75 1.02 0.47 1.61 Ogden/Weber 1.61 Transportation and warehousing 0.55 0.23 0.70 0.31 0.56 0.57 0.00 0.55 Boise/Ada 0.70 Finance and insurance 0.63 0.53 1.14 0.44 0.59 0.49 0.80 1.09 Boise/Ada 1.14 Local Sectors Utilities 0.50 0.33 1.03 0.00 1.02 0.45 0.00 0.49 Boise/Ada 1.03 Construction 2.09 0.58 1.39 0.66 1.66 1.35 1.19 1.34 Bozeman/Gallatin 2.09 Retail trade 1.31 0.87 1.05 0.93 1.31 1.10 1.28 1.08 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.31 Real estate and rental and leasing 1.30 0.94 0.95 0.76 1.04 1.24 1.00 0.57 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.30 Administrative and waste services 0.62 0.56 1.38 0.00 0.90 0.81 0.78 1.18 Boise/Ada 1.38 Educational services 0.72 0.79 0.53 0.61 0.62 0.53 0.47 0.66 Boulder/Boulder 0.79 Health care and social assistance 0.72 0.86 1.05 1.21 1.18 0.73 1.22 0.88 Missoula/Missoula 1.22 Arts, entertainment, and recreation 1.99 1.16 1.46 0.78 1.80 1.13 1.66 1.08 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.99 Accommodation and food services 1.47 0.94 1.02 1.05 1.42 1.21 1.28 0.85 Bozeman/Gallatin 1.47 Other services, except public administration 1.39 0.95 0.96 1.32 1.27 1.04 1.57 0.79 Missoula/Missoula 1.57 Source: Economic & Planning Systems 360 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |34 APPENDIX: INDUSTRY DETAIL MANUFACTURING 3 Digit NAICS Industry Name Sector Total (Disclosable)% Total LQ vs. U.S.Avg. Ann. Wage Includes Photonics?Description Total Private Wage & Salary Jobs 50,672Total Manufacturing Sector 3,598 7.1%0.70 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 532 1.0%2.16 $55,574 Medical equip, sporting goods, musical instr. 334 Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing 402 0.8%0.90 $88,788 Y Computer, electronic, instrumentation, measuring/controlling, photonics 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing 391 0.8%0.67 $48,961 Forging, stamping, bending, forming, and machining 312 Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing 367 0.7%3.16 $30,203 Breweries, distilleries, etc. 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing 290 0.6%1.72 $63,779 Stone, tile, cement products 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing 257 0.5%0.87 $43,929 Plastic containers, hardware, plumbing 311 Food Manufacturing 248 0.5%0.37 $36,480 Bakeries, coffee, tea, dairy products 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing 150 0.3%0.22 $58,928 Boats, trailers, vehicle parts 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing 144 0.3%0.94 $44,262 Furniture, cabinetry 335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing 114 0.2%0.71 $59,485 Y Lighting, electrical, communications, appliances 323 Printing and Related Support Activities 99 0.2%0.62 $38,849 Y Printing, data imaging 314 Textile Product Mills 93 0.2%2.18 $32,668 Textile manufacturing 333 Machinery Manufacturing 88 0.2%0.20 $73,874 Y Optical instruments and lenses, photographic equipment, commercial laundry and dry-cleaning machinery, office machinery, automotive maintenance equipment (except mechanics' hand tools), and commercial-type cooking equipment 321 Wood Product Manufacturing 81 0.2%0.48 $49,465 Wood bldg. materials, manufactured structures 315 Apparel Manufacturing 5 0.0%0.13 $32,572 Apparel 316 Leather and Allied Product Manufacturing 4 0.0%0.39 $18,653 Leather products Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Economic & Planning Systems 361 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |35 APPENDIX: INDUSTRY DETAIL PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL SERVICES 4 Digit NAICS Industry Name Sector Total (Disclosable) % Total LQ vs. U.S.Avg. Ann. Wage Includes Photonics? Description Total Private Wage & Salary Jobs 50,672 Total Prof. & Tech. Svcs. Sector 4,828 9.5%1.20 5415 Computer Systems Design and Related Services 1,346 2.7%1.44 $141,037 Programming, IT 5413 Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services 1,094 2.2%1.72 $71,547 5416 Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services 618 1.2%0.95 $71,652 Environmental, management, administrative, other scientific consulting 5412 Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services 449 0.9%1.04 $53,752 5419 Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 424 0.8%1.35 $40,502 Marketing, photography, veterinary, other 5417 Scientific Research and Development Services 337 0.7%1.04 $94,689 Y R&D in life and social sciences. 5411 Legal Services 327 0.6%0.68 $68,183 5418 Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services 133 0.3%0.71 $60,349 5414 Specialized Design Services 100 0.2%1.78 $60,754 Y Specialized design except architectural, engineering, and computer systems design Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Economic & Planning Systems 362 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |36 APPENDIX: INDUSTRY DETAIL CONSTRUCTION 3 Digit NAICS Industry Name Sector Total (Disclosable) % Total LQ vs. U.S.Avg. Ann. Wage Description Total Private Wage & Salary Jobs 50,672Total Construction Sector 6,401 12.6%2.09 237 Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction 659 1.3%1.50 $101,284 Roads, infrastructure 236 Construction of Buildings 1,837 3.6%2.72 $59,216 Residential and nonresidential buildings 238 Specialty Trade Contractors 3,906 7.7%2.01 $53,269 Concrete, site preparation, plumbing, painting, and electrical Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Economic & Planning Systems 363 Economic & Planning Systems | Bridge Economic Development Bozeman Economic Assessment |37 APPENDIX: INDUSTRY DETAIL TOURISM, RETAIL, AND OUTDOOR RECREATION 3 Digit NAICS Industry Name Sector Total (Disclosable)% Total LQ vs. U.S.Avg. Annual Wage Description Total Private Wage & Salary Jobs 50,672 Retail 3,598 7.1%1.31 Retail stores Recreation 1,819 3.6%1.99 Recreation businesses including ski areas Accommodations & Food Services 8,190 16.2%1.47 Hotels and restaurants Cluster Total 13,607 26.9% Retail 445 Food and beverage stores 1,541 3.0%1.18 $31,786 444 Building material and garden supply stores 1,193 2.4%2.08 $45,429 452 General merchandise stores 1,107 2.2%0.89 $32,580 441 Motor vehicle and parts dealers 1,036 2.0%1.29 $60,870 453 Miscellaneous store retailers 784 1.5%2.52 $31,388 451 Sports, hobby, music instrument, book stores 674 1.3%3.37 $23,189 447 Gasoline stations 541 1.1%1.39 $25,669 442 Furniture and home furnishings stores 392 0.8%2.26 $49,206 448 Clothing and clothing accessories stores 341 0.7%0.83 $25,758 446 Health and personal care stores 250 0.5%0.61 $34,298 454 Nonstore retailers 221 0.4%0.89 $60,018 443 Electronics and appliance stores 110 0.2%0.59 $43,276 Recreation, Hotels, Restaurants 722 Food services and drinking places 5,054 10.0%1.23 $20,992 721 Accommodation 1,857 3.7%3.13 $33,408 713 Amusements, gambling, and recreation 1,216 2.4%2.27 $26,058 Includes ski areas 711 Performing arts and spectator sports 124 0.2%0.88 $36,767 712 Museums, historical sites, zoos, and parks 116 0.2%---$45,924 712 Museums, historical sites, zoos, and parks 116 0.2%---$45,924 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Economic & Planning Systems 364 ATTACHMENT B 365 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org Partners x More small business owners access programs Number of new businesses accessing services City of Bozeman Prospera, NRMEDD, Chamber, DBP x Small businesses are more likely to succeed and grow Resource guide is created and maintained annually. City of Bozeman Prospera, NRMEDD, Chamber, DBP x More small businesses are started or grown Capital and technical services are provided to under-represented businesses at no or low cost City of Bozeman Prospera, NRMEDD, MOFI x Remove barriers to starting a new business Roundtable is created and provides recommendations City of Bozeman Small businesses EVS ACTION MATRIX Progress Check-in A. Convene providers to map the various programs available for different business sizes and types to 1) better communicate available resources and 2) determine gaps in service provision. C. Convene service providers to determine if there is an opportunity to start a microenterprise service for under- represented businesses. Build off culture and concept of Women Business Center that provides a welcoming safe space for a specific group. D. Develop a business services roundtable comprised of underrepresented business owners and employees, to advise the City of Bozeman on its business friendliness for small businesses especially owned by under- represented individuals. Staff time B. Create a resource guide outlining available programs and contact information. Notes and/or Potential Resources Tie to proposed business, retention and expansion (BRE) program identified in Action 2.1.G Seed funding can come from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). MESO of Oregon should be considered as a best case example. https://www.mesopdx.org/ Action GOAL 1: PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR GALLATIN VALLEY RESIDENTS Objective 1.1: Enhance the small business development ecosystem Staff time Green text indicates actions developed in collaboration with education partners. 1 of 7 366 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org*Partners** x More affordable child care opportunities are available Statute(s) amended City of Bozeman MLCT/MACO x More affordable child care opportunities are available An increase in day care providers City of Bozeman MLCT/MACO x Build awareness of future career opportunities to access living wage jobs High-school graduation and dropout rate, including under- represented students Belgrade and Bozeman School District Gallatin College and MSU x Enhance early skills development to prepare for higher-education opportunities New programs identified and implemented Gallatin College MSU, Belgrade and Bozeman School District Superintendents x Increase job opportunities, particularly for under- represented individuals, within these industries Report number of jobs within the industries and percentage of under-represented hires Gallatin College and MSU Belgrade and Bozeman School District CTE Program Director D. Evaluate gaps and needs with partnerships between Gallatin Valley’s high schools and higher education leaders and industry to identify and develop opportunities for intentional engagement of students. E. Communicate to 9-12 students opportunities with existing Gallatin College programs pertaining to manufacturing, health care, and cyber-security Staff time Organizations are already meeting and anticipate draft direction in October Notes and/or Potential Resources Objective 1.2: Provide comprehensive and coordinated skills development starting with child care through middle school and higher-ed Action A. Explore opportunities to amend Montana statute(s) to allow HOAs to permit in-home child care. C. Engage middle school students (6-8 grades), teachers and administrators in STEM career opportunity conversations. Specifically consider rural communities. Specifically focus on programs for jobs in high demand with good wages and fewer years of education requirements. B. Elevate the issue of child care as critical infrastructure to support workforce development and promote equitable early education opportunities for under- represented communities. Staff time Green text indicates actions developed in collaboration with education partners. 2 of 7 367 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org*Partners** x Increase participation of rural residents Number of completed certifications City of Bozeman MSU Extension Center x Increase job opportunities and improve energy efficiency of building stock. Number of skilled HVAC construction workers in Gallatin Valley Gallatin College City of Bozeman x Increase opportunities to start small businesses and build wealth Number of people attending classes City of Bozeman Local EDOs and language training providers 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org*Partners** x Continued university R&D in quantum computing Enhanced research funding MSU and MSU IC City of Bozeman and local EDOs x Supply chain study to define the types of companies needed to support this new industry within Gallatin Valley Study is complete and shared with economic development community. MSU VP of Research and Graduate City of Bozeman and local EDOs x Private business can share equipment for testing and collaborate to foster innovation. Incubator is established.City of Bozeman NRMEDD, MSU IC, MSU TTO Staff time Notes and/or Potential Resources B. Create and support specific workforce development programs in building sciences (construction trades) specializing in green technology. Specifically, consider programs in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, to provide the workers needed to improve the efficiency of existing and future building stock. Action National Science Foundation (NSF) grant Objective 1.3: Improve access to career opportunities for local and surrounding rural residents A. Promote Montana State University's new Extension Center Master Remote Work Professional Certification that provides training for rural residents. GOAL 2: SUPPORT A DIVERSE ECONOMY Objective 2.1: Focus on traded sector industries that are emerging and can increase exports Action Notes and/or Potential Resources A. Support quantum computing university research and development through continued investments in MonArk labs, Spectrum Labs, and the upcoming NSF Type I application for a Regional Innovation Engine. Increasing the amount of this skilled workforce directly supports necessary actions to address climate change. C. Develop virtual small business development programs for rural residents and those that speak English as a second language These programs are currently available through MESO and could be developed locally with new microenterprise program. World Language Initiative may provide services as well. B. Support the analysis and development of the quantum computing supply chain and the unique strengths in Gallatin Valley This would be part of the Type 1 application, but fund through Economic Development Administration (EDA) or Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) if not awarded. C. Create an incubator with specialized equipment for new private small research companies within the quantum and photonics industries EDA and NSF grant Green text indicates actions developed in collaboration with education partners. 3 of 7 368 x New biotechnology companies are started or attracted Biotech lab space is created.City of Bozeman Biotech Association, MSUs TTO, and Local EDOs x Increase diversity of industry sectors Students enrolling in programs. MSU Film Department Local EDOs, City of Bozeman, Montana Film Office, local members of the film industry, supportive state legislators x Understand barriers and opportunities specific to manufacturing to help them stay and grow. Program is defined with identified number of businesses that will be visited. City of Bozeman NRMEDD, Prospera 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org*Partners** x Training facility provides the necessary workforce Training facility is built Gallatin College City of Bozeman and Local EDOs x x x Educate community on photonics industry Number of students that attend event.Gallatin College Private photonics firms, City of Bozeman, MSU x School districts can provide current information on career opportunities and help develop necessary skills needed by businesses Changes in information provided to students influenced by private business engagement Private industry associations City of Bozeman, Local EDOs, Education partners x Higher-ed students discover local job opportunities while in school and are more likely to stay in Gallatin Valley Number of new internships and programs created at private businesses. Private industry associations City of Bozeman, Local EDOs, Education partners D. Facilitate the creation of opportunities for students to engage with local businesses, such as internships, apprenticeships, work-based learning and job shadowing Explore this type of engagement through BRE outreach A. Support development of a purpose built campus for the technical and trades facility at Gallatin College D. Explore the development of biotechnology lab space to support emerging businesses Explore collaborating with new Industry project at MSU IC. Economic Development Administration (EDA) could provide grant for lab space tenant improvements. C. Aid and support local school districts by offering suggestions for developing a working relationship among businesses, labor organizations, and educators Staff time. BRE of existing companies (instead of recruiting new companies) is the most effective way to grow employment opportunities sustainably. B. Host a photonics/optics event at the County Fairgrounds during the Fall to expose community to career opportunities. Objective 2.2: Enhance development of the talent pipeline Consider private company sponsorships E. Support the expansion of film degree programs at MSU to leverage emerging Digital Film industry Existing MSU program Notes and/or Potential Resources Staff time. State budget allocation Explore this type of engagement through BRE outreach Action F. Develop a formal business, retention and expansion (BRE) program in collaboration with partners focused on industries associated with manufacturing: Photonics, Outdoor Equipment, Specialty Manufacturing, and potentially Climate Tech Green text indicates actions developed in collaboration with education partners. 4 of 7 369 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org*Partners** X City recovers administrative and enforcement costs. Neighborhood impacts are managed. Number of STRs licensed STRs. Resident satisfaction with STR programs. City of Bozeman Housing, Code Enforcement, and Legal Departments X Study/documentation of characteristics of STR inventory. Quantification of number of STRs potentially available as full-time residences. City of Bozeman Realtors, property managers, lodging groups x Housing supply is increased or maintained. Number of STRs, rental rates, rental vacancy rates.City of Bozeman Housing, Code Enforcement, and Legal Departments x Increase supply of housing for GV workers Housing units developed by private sector businesses City of Bozeman Private sector partners x Increase supply of housing for GV workers Housing units developed by private sector businesses City of Bozeman & various private sector partners Private sector partners x Increase opportunities to access home ownership Number of residents that have received assistance City of Bozeman HRDC and MOFI x Increase access to available housing Evaluation of zoning code City of Bozeman MSU Office of Student Engagement x Increase supply of housing for MSU non-traditional and graduate students Number of housing units City of Bozeman MSU Office of Student Engagement, private developers GOAL 3: BUILD A MORE RESILIENT REGION Objective 3.1: Increase amount and access to housing for all Notes and/or Potential Resources Staff time Action A. Ensure that short term rentals (STRs) are licensed and complying with City regulations. G. Explore the city zoning restriction on maximimum occupancy within a residence. Staff time and consultant engagement Staff time, private equity C. Explore the feasibility of additional regulatory tools to mitigate the impact of STRs and part-time homes on the housing supply. Specifically examining regulatory fees on STRs and a housing vacancy tax. H. Explore creation of a public-private partnership and sub-area plan for redevelopment of the West Side Houses for non-traditional students. B. Evaluate the potential impacts of STRs on housing availability for the full time resident workforce. Staff time and consultant engagement F. Promote housing down payment assistance program MOFI Staff time E. Explore building more housing through a co- operative agreement amongst private businesses. First Security Bank Housing Fund, potential Prospera Impact Fund D. Explore a land acquisition policy recognizing funding is barrier. First Security Bank Housing Fund, potential Prospera Impact Fund Green text indicates actions developed in collaboration with education partners. 5 of 7 370 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org*Partners** x Reduce water consumption to extend the use of a limited supply of water Increased use of the city's water conservation programs City of Bozeman City residents and businesses x Improves building energy efficiency Number of loans and projects implemented City of Bozeman City residents and businesses x Recognizes good practices to encourage investment by others Number and type of projects submitted for awards City of Bozeman City residents and businesses x Provide more housing at a lower price with reduced costs for infrastructure expansion Number of housing units City of Bozeman Bozeman City Commission x Provide residents diverse travel options alternative to a car when appropriate Number of projects constructed City of Bozeman Streamline, MDT, DBA, TCC E. Support City of Bozeman's investment in multi-modal transportation options, including strategies to charge for parking in appropriate locations in the City. Objective 3.2: Develop a sustainable city Staff time Staff time Notes and/or Potential ResourcesAction Staff time D. Support proposed changes to Bozeman Zoning code to allow for smaller housing units on smaller lots B. Actively promote the existing commercial property- assessed clean energy (CPACE) financing structure that allows building owners to borrow money for energy efficiency projects. Staff time C. Explore the development of an award that recognizes investments in buildings and sites to encourage sustainable development practices. Staff time A. Increase support and awareness for the existing City of Bozeman water efficiency program Green text indicates actions developed in collaboration with education partners. 6 of 7 371 1 - 2 yr 3 - 4 yr 5 yr Priority Outcome Metric (how to measure)Lead Org*Partners** x Develop awareness of climate tech companies and begin to support their growth List of companies and defined needs is created. Businesses meet to share interests and collaboration. City of Bozeman Local EDOs, MSU TTO, Energy Research Institute (ERI), Snow Lab, Optics/Sensing, Precision Agriculture x Develop new agriculture practices that reduce water consumption and conserve soil integrity Application for an Innovation Hub is submitted MSU Department of Agriculture City of Bozeman and Local EDOs x Actively support local emerging companies and convey to community that climate change is being addressed Number of new climate tech companies promoted City of Bozeman MSU TTO, MSU IC and Local EDOs x Develop new technologies to help community adapt to impacts of climate change Number of new climate tech companies created City of Bozeman MSU TTO, MSU IC and Local EDOs x Facilitate private investment into domestic low carbon, climate resilient (LCR) infrastructure and other green sectors Establish the Bank City of Bozeman Local EDOs x Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing use of fossil fuel Northwestern Energy fuel source City of Bozeman and Northwestern Energy Local EDOs C. Explore the development of a program that supports and promotes new startup companies (e.g. awards and small grant award) in the defined Climate Technology cluster. CDBG, Venture Capital, Foundations Staff time A. Develop a Climate Technology industry group to identify existing companies, barriers to growth, and workforce needs. This information will define the Climate Technology industry unique to Gallatin Valley. Climate Technology is a broad field that includes data analytics, construction materials, carbon sequestering, agriculture production methods, etc. One "lane" should be defined for GV to make progress. F. Work with Northwestern Energy to foster development of non-fossil fuel energy production B. Advocate for an MSU Agriculture Department initiative to create innovation hub for Western US that aligns research with agriculture producers and advances precision agriculture Action Objective 3.3: Foster a culture focused on climate change resilience E. Explore the creation of a regional non-profit Green Bank for funding new climate resilient infrastructure. https://greenbanknetwork.org/what-is-a-green-bank-2/ IRA may capitalize a national Green Bank that could fund the regional bank through grants or loans. Staff time and IRA EDA, Department of Agriculture, IRA D. Explore the development of private incubator that supports the defined Climate Technology cluster. Notes and/or Potential Resources Green text indicates actions developed in collaboration with education partners. 7 of 7 372 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Deputy Director of Community Development Anna Bentley, Director of Community Development SUBJECT:Ordinance 2130, Provisional Adoption, South 40 Zone Map Amendment to rezone a parcel from R-2 (Residential Moderate Density) and R-1 (Residential Low Density) to REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use) on 41.38 Acres, Application 22279, a Property Located at the Southeast Corner of South 19th Avenue and West Graf Street MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Ordinance RECOMMENDATION:Provisionally adopt Ordinance 2130. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:The applicant and property owners, Providence Development, submitted application to rezone an existing parcel of approximately 41.38 acres from R- 1 (Residential Low Density) and R-2 (Residential Moderate Density) to REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use). The public hearing was held on December 13, 2022 and the Commission unanimously approved the application. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As determined by the Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: 22279 South 40 ZMA Ordinance 2130.pdf 5659011-ZONE- Map 080422.pdf Report compiled on: February 9, 2023 373 Ord 2130 Page 1 of 6 ORDINANCE NO. 2130 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA AMENDING THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING MAP TO REZONE A PARCEL OF LAND FROM R-1, RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AND R-2, RESIDENTIAL MODERATE DENSITY, TO REMU, RESIDENTIAL EMPHASIS MIXED USE, ON 41.38 ACRES, THE SOUTH 40 ZONE MAP AMENDMENT, APPLICATION 22279. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has adopted zoning regulations and a zoning map pursuant to Sections 76-2-301 and 76-2-302, M.C.A.; and WHEREAS, Section 76-2-305, M.C.A. allows local governments to amend zoning maps if a public hearing is held and official notice is provided; and WHEREAS, Section 76-2-307, M.C.A. states that the Zoning Commission must conduct a public hearing and submit a report to the City Commission for all zoning map amendment requests; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Zoning Commission has been created by Section 2.05.2700, BMC as provided for in Section 76-2-307, M.C.A.; and WHEREAS, Chapter 38, Article 2, Part 2 of the Bozeman Unified Development Code sets forth the procedures and review criteria for zoning map amendments; and WHEREAS, the proposed zone map amendment application to amend the City of Bozeman Zoning Map to rezone an existing parcel from R-1 (Residential Low Density) and R-2 (Residential Moderate Density) to REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use) on 41.38 acres has been properly submitted, reviewed, and advertised; and WHEREAS, after proper notice, the Bozeman Zoning Commission held a public hearing on November 21, 2022 to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for a zone map amendment; and 374 Ordinance No. 2130, South 40 ZMA Page 2 of 6 WHEREAS, the Bozeman Zoning Commission recommended to the Bozeman City Commission that application No. 22279, the South 40 Zone Map Amendment, be approved as requested by the applicant; and WHEREAS, after proper notice, the City Commission held its public hearing on December 13, 2022, to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for the zone map amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed and considered the zone map amendment criteria established in Section 76-2-304, M.C.A., and found that the proposed zone map amendment would be in compliance with the criteria. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA: Section 1 Legislative Findings The City Commission hereby makes the following findings in support of adoption of this Ordinance: 1. The City adopted a growth policy, the Bozeman Community Plan 2020, by Resolution 5133 to establish policies for development of the community including zoning; 2. The Bozeman Community Plan 2020, Chapter 5, sets forth the policies by which the City reviews and applies the criteria for amendment of zoning established in 76-3-304, MCA; 3. Zoning, including amendments to the zoning map, must be in accordance with an adopted growth policy; 4. A staff report analyzing the required criteria for a zone map amendment, including accordance to the Bozeman Community Plan 2020, has found that the required criteria are satisfied; 5. The two required public hearings were advertised as required in state law and municipal code and all persons have had opportunity to review the materials applicable to the application and provide comment prior to a decision; 6. The Bozeman Zoning Commission has been established as required in state law and conducted their required public hearing; and after consideration of application materials, 375 Ordinance No. 2130, South 40 ZMA Page 3 of 6 staff analysis and report, and all submitted public comment recommended approval of the requested REMU district. 7. The City Commission conducted a public hearing to provide all interested parties the opportunity to provide evidence and testimony regarding the proposed amendment prior to the City Commission acting on the application. 8. The City Commission considered the application materials, staff analysis and report, Zoning Commission recommendation, all submitted public comment, and all other relevant information. 9. The City Commission determines that, as set forth in the staff report and incorporating the staff findings as part of their decision, the required criteria for approval of the South 40 Zone Map Amendment have been satisfied. Section 2 That the zoning district designation of the following-described property is hereby amended from R-1, Residential Low Density and R-2, Residential Moderate Density to REMU, Residential Emphasis Mixed Use: The property is described as: A Tract of land being the SW1/4NW1/4 and the NW1/4SW1/4 of Section 24, Excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the State of Montana in Bargain and Sale Deed recorded June 30, 1964 in Book 146 of Deeds, Page 24, Records of Gallatin County, located in the NW1/4 and SW1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, being more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 1 and lying S89°31'54" W a distance of 30.00 feet from the Center-West 1/16th corner of section 24 and being the True Point of Beginning; thence S0°17'12" E along the east line of said Lot 1 Block 2 of Minor Subdivision No. 494, for a distance of 1329.88 feet to a point being the southeast corner of said Lot 1 and also a point on the east-west south 1/16th line of said section 24; thence S88°58'32"W along the south line of said lot 1 for a distance of 1307.81 feet to the section line common to sections 23 and 24, T.2S.,R.5E.,P.M.; thence N00°42'16" W along said section line for a distance of 1368.09 feet to the intersection of the centerline of Graf Street extended per Yellowstone Theological Institute Minor Subdivision 494; thence along the said centerline the following (3) 376 Ordinance No. 2130, South 40 ZMA Page 4 of 6 courses: thence N89°05'08" E for a distance of 1050.01 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 26°09'42", an arc length of 136.98 feet thence; along a compound curve to the right with a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 26°56'09", an arc length of 141.04 feet; thence S0°09'49"E for a distance of 97.21 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said Lot 1 having 41.38 acres, along with and subject to any easements. Section 3 Repealer. All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4 Savings Provision. This ordinance does not affect the rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred or proceedings that were begun before the effective date of this ordinance. All other provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code not amended by this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5 Severability. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Bozeman Municipal Code as a whole. 377 Ordinance No. 2130, South 40 ZMA Page 5 of 6 Section 6 Codification. This Ordinance shall not be codified but shall be kept by the City Clerk and entered into a disposition list in numerical order with all other ordinances of the City and shall be organized in a category entitled “Zone Map Amendments.” Section 7 Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after final adoption. 378 Ordinance No. 2130, South 40 ZMA Page 6 of 6 PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, on first reading at a regular session held on the 28 day of February, 2023. ____________________________________ CYNTHIA L. ANDRUS Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk FINALLY PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana on second reading at a regular session thereof held on the ___ of ____________________, 2023. The effective date of this ordinance is __________, ___, 2023. _________________________________ CYNTHIA L. ANDRUS Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 379 8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S 8S 8S 8S8W8W8W8W S18S18S12W12W12W SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10S 20' WIDE DITCH MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 10' ROAD DEDICATION 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 20' WIDE DITCH MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 30' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. No. 2476615 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 8S 8S8S8S8S8S8S8SSSS S18SD18SDS SS S S SN0°42'16"W 1368.09'R=300 .0 0 'L=13 6 .9 8 'Δ =26 °0 9 '4 2 " CB=N76 °0 0 '17 "E CH=13 5 .8 0 'R =3 0 0.0 0 ' L =1 4 1.0 4' Δ =2 6 °5 6 '0 9" C B =N 7 6 °2 3 '3 0 "E C H =13 9 .7 4' S0°09'49"E 97.21'S0°17'12"E 1329.88'S88°58'32"W 1307.81' N89°05'08"E 1050.01' ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: FLD WK. BY: CHK. BY: DATE: 2022 Plotted by nick mcmichael on Aug/4/2022N:\5659\011 -YTI Development\ACAD\Exhibits\5659011-ZONE- Map 052422.dwgZONE MAP BOZEMAN MONTANA 5659.011 EX-1 JCW JCW MEE 8/2022engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net 200SOUTH 19TH AVENUESOUTHBRIDGE SUB.PHASE1LOT 1BLK 42021 SE CORNER SOUTH 19th AVENUE & GRAF STREET ZONE MAP ZONE AREA SUMMARY TOTAL ZONE AREA: LEGAL DESCRIPTION 41.38 acres GRAF STREET YELL O W S T O N E T H E O L O GI C A L INSTI T U T E MI N O R S U B 4 9 4 LOT 1, B L O C K 2 - 3 8. 4 1 A C PROP O S E D Z O N I N G: R E M U EXITI N G Z O N I N G: R- 1 & R- 2 SUMMER WAY LANEBROOKDALE DR ALDER CREEK DR SOUTHBRIDGE DR LOT 1BLK 5PUBLICPARKPUBLICPARKLOT AMINORSUB 235ALOT 3MINORSUB 235ALOT 2MINORSUB 235LOT 3, BLK 1MINOR SUB 494LOT 3, BLK 1MINOR SUB 494LOT 1, BLK 1MINOR SUB 494LOT 4, B L K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 ALLISON SUBANNEX, S24, T02 S,R05 E, ACRES40.217, SE4NW4ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISION PH-5ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISION PH-5ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISIONPH-5ALLISON SUB ANNEX,S24, T02 S, R05 E, TRBEING IN ALLISONANNEX NE4SW47.653AC COS 792ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISIONPH-5OPEN SPACELOT 38 BLOCK 15LOT 37 LOT 36 LOT 35 LOT 34 LOT 33 LOT 32 LOT 31 LOT 30 LOT 29 LOT 28 PARK 9 LOT 27 LOT 26 LOT 25 LOT 24 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 21 LOT 20 LOT 38 BLOCK 14BLOCK 20BLACKWOOD GROVES SUB.S24, T02 S, R05 E, ACRES117.47, S2SW4 LESS RW SEC24 & N2N2NW4 SEC 25BOZE M A N COMM U N I T Y P L A N FUTU R E L A N D U S E: RESID E N T I A L MIXED U S E BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIG H B O R H O O D A Tract of land being the SW1/4NW1/4 and the NW1/4SW1/4 of Section 24, Excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the State of Montana in Bargain and Sale Deed recorded June 30, 1964 in Book 146 of Deeds, Page 24, Records of Gallatin County, located in the NW1/4 and SW1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana,being more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 1 and lying S89°31'54" W a distance of 30.00 feet from the Center-West 1/16th corner of section 24 and being the True Point of Beginning; thence S0°17'12" E along the east line of said Lot 1 Block 2 of Minor Subdivision No. 494, for a distance of 1329.88 feet to a point being the southeast corner of said Lot 1 and also a point on the east-west south 1/16th line of said section 24; thence S88°58'32"W along the south line of said lot 1 for a distance of 1307.81 feet to the section line common to sections 23 and 24, T.2S.,R.5E.,P.M.; thence N00°42'16" W along said section line for a distance of 1368.09 feet to the intersection of the centerline of Graf Street extended per Yellowstone Theological Institute Minor Subdivision 494; thence along the said centerline the following (3) courses: thence N89°05'08" E for a distance of 1050.01 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 26°09'42", an arc length of 136.98 feet thence; along a compound curve to the right with a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 26°56'09", an arc length of 141.04 feet; thence S0°09'49"E for a distance of 97.21 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said Lot 1 having 41.38 acres, along with and subject to any easements.SOUTH 15TH AVEPROPOSED ZONING REMU 41.38 acres REMU ZONING:41.38 acres POINT OF BEGINNING 380 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Nakeisha Lyon, Associate Planner Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Erin George, Deputy Director of Community Development Anna Bentley, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: West Park Neighborhood Preliminary Plat Application, to Subdivide Four Restricted Development Lots Platted with Norton East Ranch Phase 6 into Four Restricted Development Lots with Associated Stormwater, Open Space, City Park, Easements, and Right-of-way, Located Northeast of the Corner of Laurel Parkway and West Babcock Street, Application 22178 (Quasi-Judicial) MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Quasi-Judicial RECOMMENDATION:I move to approve the West Park Neighborhood Preliminary Plat application with staff recommended conditions of approval and code provisions with the submitted subdivision variances. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:A major preliminary plat subdivision application of 40.83 acres to subdivide four (4) restricted development lots from Phase 6 of the Norton East Ranch Subdivision into four (4) developable lots, one (1) city park lot, two (2) open space lots, easements, and associated right of way. The subdivision is proposed to be completed in four phases. The subject property is zoned R-4, Residential High Density District, and the underlying growth policy designation is Urban Neighborhood. The proposed uses of townhouses and apartments are allowed within the R-4 zoning district. On December 9, 2022, the Development Review Committee (DRC) found the application sufficient for continued review and recommends the conditions and code provisions identified in the staff report. On February 6, 2023 the Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Planning Board voted unanimously, 5-0, to recommend approval of the application with conditions, code provisions, and submitted subdivision variances. The primary responsibility of the Planning Board in subdivision review is to 381 comment on compliance of the proposed plat with the growth policy. A video of the meeting can be found here. The subdivider requested review of this subdivision under the terms of 76-3- 616 MCA as authorized in 38.240.100. Subdivisions reviewed under the terms of 76-3-616 may include variances or other instances of lack of compliance to standards and procedures. The subdivider has requested four (4) subdivision variances with this application, and two (2) waivers were granted with the pre-application review. These subdivision variances are related to the following code sections: BMC 38.400.010.A.1 - Relation to undeveloped areas, BMC 38.400.010.A.2 - Relation to developed areas, and BMC 38.400.010. - Block Length. These subdivision variances are in regards to the extension of Cascade St. to the eastern boundary of the subject property, the extension of Water Lily Dr. to W. Babcock St. on the southern boundary of the subject property, and block length between the existing Cottonwood Rd. and the proposed Pond Lily Dr. along W. Babcock St. Further information is provided in Section 2 of the Staff Report. The final decision for this preliminary plat must be made by March 9, 2023. Materials in the submittal relevant to the City Commission’s duties include: Application Narrative Application Documents Application Plans The application documents folder will contain the infrastructure reports including water, sewer, stormwater, and traffic impacts, as well as documentation to demonstrate compliance with Chapter 38 including compliance with adopted standards required in BMC 38.220.060. The application plans folder will contain the full plat set of 4 sheets, proposed landscaping plans, proposed hardscape, and proposed irrigation plans. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:There are no unresolved issues with this application. ALTERNATIVES:1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions, code provisions and subdivision variances; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended conditions, code provisions, and subdivision variances; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission's findings of non- compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Continue the public meeting on the application, with specific direction to staff or the subdivider to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS: Fiscal impacts are undetermined at this time, but will include increased 382 property tax revenues from new development, along with increased costs to delivery municipal services to the property. Impact fees will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for individual buildings along with City sewer and water connection fees. Attachments: 22178 City Commission Staff Report.pdf Report compiled on: February 21, 2023 383 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 1 of 41 22178 Staff Report for the West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Public Meeting Dates: Community Development Board acting as the Planning Board meeting - Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:00 pm in the Commission Meeting Room in Bozeman City Hall, 121 N. Rouse Ave., Bozeman, MT. The meeting is also available online. A link will be provided with the agenda. City Commission meeting will be held Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 6:00 pm at 6:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room in Bozeman City Hall, 121 N. Rouse Ave., Bozeman, MT. The meeting will be available online. A link will be provided with the agenda. Project Description: A major preliminary plat subdivision application requesting permission for the division of 40.83 acres into four (4) developable lots zoned R-4, one (1) city park lot, and two (2) open space lots, easements, and associated rights of way. The site is located south of Vaughn Dr., east of Laurel Pkwy., and north of W. Babcock St. Additionally, the applicant is requesting four subdivision variances related to the following code sections: BMC 38.400.010.A.1 - Relation to undeveloped areas, BMC 38.400.010.A.2 - Relation to developed areas, and BMC 38.400.010. - Block Length. These subdivision variances are in regards to the extension of Cascade St. to the eastern boundary of the subject property, the extension of Water Lily Dr. to W. Babcock St. on the southern boundary of the subject property, and block length between the existing Cottonwood Rd. and the proposed Pond Lily Dr. along W. Babcock St. Project Location: The property is legally described as Lots R1A, R1B, R1C, and R1D of Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 6, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Acres 6.63, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, according to the official plat J-694 thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. The legal description will changed upon approval and recordation of the West Park Subdivision Final Plat Application. Staff Finding: The application conforms to standards and is sufficient for approval with conditions and code provisions. Recommended Planning Board Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22178 and move for the Community Development Board in its capacity as the Planning Board to recommend approval of the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions and subdivision variances. 384 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 2 of 41 Recommended City Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22178 and move to approve the subdivision variance to BMC 38.400.010.A.1. with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Recommended City Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22178 and move to approve the subdivision variance to BMC 38.400.010.A.2. with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Recommended City Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22178 and move to approve the subdivision variance to BMC 38.400.010.B. with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Recommended City Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22178 and move to approve the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Report Date: February 21, 2023 Staff Contact: Nakeisha Lyon, Associate Planner Simon Lindsey, Project Engineer Agenda Item Type: Consent (Quasi-judicial) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is based on the application materials submitted and public comment received to date. The application materials are available in the City’s Laserfiche archive and may be accessed through the Community Development viewer as well. Two written public comments have been received as of the writing of this report. All public comments are included in the City’s Laserfiche archive and available to the public. Staff’s analysis and findings related to the submitted public comments are included in Appendix A below. Unresolved Issues. There are no unresolved issues with this application. 385 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 3 of 41 Project Summary The Department of Community Development received a Preliminary Plat Application on May 25, 2022 requesting permission to subdivide 40.83 acres into four (4) developable lots, one (1) city park lot, and two (2) open space lots, easements and associated rights of way. The site is located south of Vaughn Drive, East of Laurel Parkway, and North of West Babcock Street as Phase 6 of the Norton East Ranch Subdivision. The existing four (4) restricted development lots were previously approved by the City Commission on March 9, 2021 with the Findings of Fact and Order signed on March 23, 2021 (Project No. 21024) as a component of Phase 5 of the Norton East Ranch Subdivision. These restricted lots require further subdivision review or site plan review prior to any development. The intention of this proposed amended plat is to further subdivide the existing lots to adequately accommodate multi-household development options through larger lot sizes and pedestrian rights of way in lieu of streets to serve as transportation corridors. The property is currently vacant and zoned R-4, Residential High Density District. Access is provided through the extension of Vaughn Drive from Laurel Parkway and the extension of Pond Lily Drive from West Babcock Street. Based on site constraints and critical conditions located along the eastern boundary of the subject property, the applicant has submitted two variances requesting that the continuation of Cascade Street not be provided in accordance with Sec. 38.400.100.A.1 and Sec. 38.400.100.A.2, BMC. If the extension of Cascade Street is necessary in the future, the applicant has included an east-west right of way easement connecting Vaughn Drive to the eastern property boundary. Baxter Creek runs along the eastern boundary of the subject property and is surrounded by jurisdictional wetlands which are restricted through a covenant of dedication between the applicant and the Army Corp of Engineers. Based on the proposed subdivision layout and variance requests, this area will not be impacted by the proposed development of the subdivision. Additionally, this area is proposed as a City Park serving as an extension of the Adam Bronken Park to the north. The southwest corner of the proposed subdivision contains non-jurisdictional wetlands proposed to be an undeveloped open space area (Block 2, Open Space 1) which is also protected by a covenant of dedication restriction. Non-jurisdictional wetlands are located in the north central portion of the subject property, bordering Block 1, Lot 1, and Block 1, Lot 2 and portions of the proposed extension to Vaughn Drive. The applicant proposes to fill this area during future development of these lots and provides mitigation on the southeastern portion of the subject property by expanding the existing borrow pit area located in the City Park. The subdivision proposes 11.24 acres of city park lots which comprises the portion of Baxter Creek that runs along the eastern boundary of the property, surrounding jurisdictional wetlands, an existing borrow pit, and mitigated wetlands created from impacts to non-jurisdictional wetlands located central to the property. The park is divided into 2 separate park parcels to accommodate a phased development approach, each spanning the long eastern blocks of the development, providing long segments of trail, a bridge connection to the north for the existing Bronken Park, the conversion of an existing borrow pit and mitigated wetlands into an enhanced 386 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 4 of 41 pond, playground area, and various site furnishings. Together the park parcels meet the intent of Linear Parks within the Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan (PROST) and meets the required minimum frontage requirements for dedicated parkland. Based on the proposed residential density, a combination of land dedication and improvements-in-lieu of parkland are required as detailed in the Parks Master Plan. The applicant has submitted four (4) subdivision variance requests in conformance with Sec. 38.250.080 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). Variance requests 1 and 2 are related to the extension of Cascade Street to the east boundary of the subject property. Sec. 38.400.100.A.1 and Sec. 38.400.100.A.2 requires that proposed streets within the development must be constructed to the boundary lines for the continuation of streets to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties for the convenient movement of traffic, effective provision of emergency services and efficient provision of utilities. Due to the location of the Baxter Creek corridor and jurisdictional wetlands along the eastern boundary of the subject property, the applicant has requested these variances in order to not extend Cascade Street as required in Division 38.400. Additionally, a covenant of dedication with the Army Corps of Engineers is located along the Baxter Creek corridor. This covenant restricts construction activities within its boundaries to protect critical lands from future development. Variance request 3 is related to the extension of Water Lily Drive to West Babcock Street to the southern boundary. As Sec. 38.400.100.A.2 requires the continuation of streets between adjacent developed properties, the applicant has requested this variance due to the existing borrow pit located directly south of the intersection. Existing geotechnical investigations show that this location is not conducive for the construction of roads and foundations. The applicant will be enhancing the borrow pit into a pond with mitigated wetlands based on their proposed impact to non-jurisdictional wetlands located central to the property. Variance request 4 is related to block length requirements denoted in Sec. 38.410.040.B. which requires blocks to not be more than 400 feet in length or less than 300 feet in length unless longer lengths are necessary due to critical lands, topography, access control, and adjacent to existing parks or open spaces. This provision denotes that in no case may a block exceed the 1,320 feet in length. In relation to Variance 3, without the extension of Water Lily Drive to West Babcock Street, the block length between Pond Lily Drive and Cottonwood Road is approximately 2000 feet in length. As the location is not conducive for the development of a roadway, the applicant is unable to meet the block length requirements of the BMC. Additionally, adjacent properties to the east include the Springhill Presbyterian Church and an undeveloped commercial node at the intersection of West Babcock St. and Cottonwood Road. Future redevelopment of the Springhill Presbyterian Church property would allow for additions to the road network access to reduce the block length in this location in the future. The Engineering Department supports these variance requests. The applicant has concurrently submitted for review and approval a site plan application for the development of Phase 1 of the West Park Neighborhood which proposes seven (7) three story 387 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 5 of 41 apartment buildings containing 102 dwelling units. The development application also includes associated vehicular and bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways, open space, stormwater infrastructure, landscaping, irrigation, and lighting. On December 9, 2022, the Development Review Committee (DRC) found the application sufficient for continued review and recommends the conditions and code provisions identified in this report. The final decision for a Major Subdivision (6 to 50 lots) subject to 76-3-616 MCA must be made within 60 working days of the date it was deemed adequate, or in this case, by March 9, 2023. The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Planning Board considered compliance of the application with the growth policy on February 6, 2023 and recommended approval unanimously 5-0 of the consent agenda item. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended conditions; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public meeting on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 388 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 6 of 41 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 Unresolved Issues. .............................................................................................................. 2 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 3 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1 – MAP SERIES .......................................................................................................... 7 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES ............................................................................... 12 SECTION 3 – RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL .......................................... 19 SECTION 4 – CODE REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 22 SECTION 5 – RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ............................................ 25 SECTION 6 – STAFF ANALYSIS and findings ......................................................................... 25 Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.240.150.B, BMC. .......................... 26 38.220.060 Documentation of compliance with adopted standards ................................. 30 APPENDIX A – PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY..................................... 36 APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 39 APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ......................................................... 39 APPENDIX D – OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF ................................. 41 FISCAL EFFECTS ....................................................................................................................... 41 ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 41 389 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 7 of 41 SECTION 1 – MAP SERIES Exhibit 1 – Zoning 390 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 8 of 41 Exhibit 2 – Community Plan 2020 Future Land Use 391 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 9 of 41 Exhibit 3 – Current Land Use 392 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 10 of 41 Exhibit 4 – Preliminary Plat 393 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 11 of 41 Exhibit 5 – Phasing Plan 394 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 12 of 41 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES The subdivider has requested four subdivision variances with this preliminary plat application as denoted below: Variance Request 1 – Extension of Cascade Street to the east property line. The applicant is requesting a variance from Sec. 38.400.010.A.1 – Relation to undeveloped areas which denotes that when a proposed development adjoins undeveloped land, and access to the undeveloped land would reasonably pass through the new development, streets and alleys within the proposed development must be arranged to allow the suitable development of the adjoining undeveloped land. Streets and alleys within the proposed development must be constructed to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions. If the development being reviewed is a subdivision, a request for an alteration of this standard must be processed as a subdivision variance. If the development being reviewed is not a subdivision, a request for an alteration of this standard must be reviewed against the criteria of section 38.250.080.B, but will not alter the review authority who would otherwise decide upon the application. Applicant Justification - Supporting Evidence for Variance Previous Norton Ranch planning efforts. During the early stages of Norton Ranch planning, the Baxter Creek corridor was envisioned as a passive wetland area bordered by trails to provide a pedestrian corridor connecting West Babcock Street to the north boundary of the project and, in cooperation with Valley West Subdivision to the north, eventually to Durston Road. This corridor was intended to provide important pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in the area. As such a Covenant of Dedication restricting the use of this corridor has been entered into with the Army Corps of Engineers restricting activities and the use of this area. Covenant of Dedication. In May of 2008 Norton Ranch entered into a Covenant of Dedication with the Army Corps of Engineers. During the development of the beginning phases of Norton Ranch it was necessary to fill some low quality wetlands to construct the Norton Ranch road system. As mitigation for the filling of these wetlands Norton Ranch placed the Covenant of Dedication, basically a deed restriction, over some of the higher quality wetlands within the Norton Ranch boundary including the Baxter Creek corridor. This Covenant of Dedication restricts all construction activities within its boundary and protects these critical lands from future development. Norton Ranch agreed to the conditions of this document based on the planning efforts during the early phases of the project. A copy of the Covenant of Dedication is included with the preliminary plat application. We draw attention to the following items in the Deed and Use Restrictions: Item 2. - “There shall be no filling, draining, excavating, dredging, mining, drilling or removal of topsoil, loam, peat, sand gravel, rock, minerals or other materials”. Item 3. - “There shall be no building or roads or paths nor any change in the topography of the land”. 395 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 13 of 41 Item 5. - “There shall be no operation of snowmobiles, motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles or any type of motorized vehicles on the Land”. These items specifically restrict the extension of Cascade Street. The construction of a road across the area covered by the Covenant of Dedication would require that the document be modified and that an Individual 404 Permit be obtained as the impact would be greater than 0.5 acre. A requirement of the Army Corp of Engineers of authorizing an individual permit is that a LEDPA (Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative) analysis be completed. It is probable that Army Corp of Engineers would determine that the existing road networks provide access to the various parcels in the vicinity and that not building a road would be the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative. During the planning stages of the West Park Neighborhood, the Army Corps of Engineers was contacted to consider the construction of some trails and a footbridge across Baxter Creek. The response from the corps was not favorable. We have included a copy of this email correspondence between our wetland consultant Christine Pearcy and Tim McNew, Senior Project Manager with the Army Corps of Engineers relating to this issue within the preliminary plat submittal. Protection of Critical Lands. BMC 38.400.010.A.1 states: “Streets and alleys within the proposed development must be constructed to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions”. We believe the critical lands associated with the Baxter Creek corridor in conjunction the associated Covenant of Dedication provides topographic and physical conditions restricting the construction of streets and alleys to the boundary line of the tract. This corridor is now a feature of this area providing a north- south pedestrian and bicycle transportation corridor along a pristine wetlands corridor and providing vital connections to the area trails. Variance Review Criteria – Sec. 38.250.080.B. Per MCA 76-3-506, a variance to this chapter must be based on specific variance criteria, and may not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this chapter. The city must not approve subdivision variances unless it makes findings based upon the evidence presented in each specific case that: 1. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties; Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, this requested variance will not have an impact to the public health safety, general welfare or be injurious to other adjoining properties. The surrounding road network provides access by West Babcock Street and Durston Road via Laurel Parkway. Local access will be provided by Pond Lily Drive, Vaughn Drive via Laurel Parkway, and Vaughn Drive through the neighboring Lakes at Valley West. An easement for the future extension Cascade Street will be provided on the final plat if the connection of Cascade Street becomes necessary in the future. Due to the presence of critical land, it would be detrimental to the general welfare of the community to require a road to be constructed across that wetland. 396 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 14 of 41 2. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, an undue hardship to the owner would result if strict interpretation of this chapter is enforced; Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, an undue hardship has been placed upon this property by the topographical critical lands and also the covenant of dedication to the Army Corps of Engineering along this wetland corridor. The covenant was placed on the property to mitigate the filling of wetlands in the early phases and was a result of the overall master planning of the project. The Army Corps of Engineers was contacted in the planning stages of this process to consider the construction of a road across the Baxter Creek corridor as well as a trail and pedestrian foot bridge. The response from those conversations was not favorable. 3. The variance will not cause a substantial increase in public costs; and Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, if the City follows the requirements of the approved Covenant of Dedication with the Army Corps of Engineers the extension of Cascade Street will not be necessary and the requested allowance to not build Cascade Street will not impact public costs. An easement is provided if the future connection becomes necessary. If required the Applicant is willing to include Cascade Street in the Waiver of the Right to Protest the Creation of Special Improvement Districts for this project to fund the connection at a future date. 4. The variance will not, in any manner, place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of this chapter or with the city's growth policy. Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, outside of the requested variances, the subdivision will be in compliance with the UDC and the Growth Policy. This is demonstrated through the Preliminary Plat Application and City Review. Staff Recommendation. The West Park Neighborhood preliminary plat application proposes to not construct Cascade Street to the eastern property line which creates non-compliance with BMC 38.400.010.A.1. The applicant has satisfied the variance criteria in BMC 38.250.080.B and provided sufficient documentation and reasoning to support the non-compliance. Based on the information provided with this application, the Director of Transportation and Engineering and City staff support the subdivision variance request. Variance Request 2 – Extension of Cascade Street to the east property line. The applicant is requesting a variance from Sec. 38.400.010.A.2 – Relation to developed areas which denotes that the developer must arrange the streets and alleys to provide for the continuation of streets and alleys between adjacent developed properties when such continuation is necessary for the convenient movement of traffic, effective provision of emergency services and efficient provision of utilities. Applicant Justification - Supporting Evidence for Variance See applicant justification – supporting evidence for Variance Request 1 above. 397 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 15 of 41 Variance Review Criteria – Sec. 38.250.080.B. Per MCA 76-3-506, a variance to this chapter must be based on specific variance criteria, and may not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this chapter. The city must not approve subdivision variances unless it makes findings based upon the evidence presented in each specific case that: 1. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties; Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, this requested variance will not have an impact to the public health, safety, and general welfare or be injurious to other adjoining properties. The presence of critical lands alongside a covenant of dedication provides topographic and physical conditions restricting the ability to construct a street to the boundary of the property. Additionally, an extensive Geotechnical Study included in the preliminary plat application shows that the remnants of a gravel pit have created a soil condition that is not conducive to foundations or roads. Furthermore, when looking at the two master planned communities surrounding this critical land, neither of them contemplated crossing this land with a road throughout their history. The surrounding road network provides access by West Babcock Street and Durston Road via Laurel Parkway. Local access will be provided by Pond Lily Drive, Vaughn Drive via Laurel Parkway, and Vaughn Drive through the neighboring Lakes at Valley West. An easement for the future extension of Cascade Street will be provided on the final plat if the connection of Cascade Street becomes necessary in the future. Due to the presence of critical land, it would be detrimental to the general welfare of the community to require a road to be constructed across that wetland. 2. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, an undue hardship to the owner would result if strict interpretation of this chapter is enforced; Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, an undue hardship has been placed upon this property by the topographical critical lands and also the covenant of dedication to the Army Corps of Engineering along this wetland corridor. The Army Corps of Engineers was contacted in the planning stages of this process to consider the construction of a road across the Baxter Creek corridor as well as a trail and pedestrian foot bridge. The response from those conversations was not favorable. 3. The variance will not cause a substantial increase in public costs; and Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, if the City follows the requirements of the approved Covenant of Dedication with the Army Corps of Engineers the extension of Cascade Street will not be necessary and the requested allowance to not build Cascade Street will not impact public costs. An easement is provided if the future connection becomes necessary. If required the Applicant is willing to include Cascade Street in the Waiver of Right to Protest the Creation of Special Improvement Districts for this project to fund the connection at a future date. 398 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 16 of 41 4. The variance will not, in any manner, place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of this chapter or with the city's growth policy. Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, outside of the requested variances, the subdivision will be in compliance with the UDC and the Growth Policy. This is demonstrated through the Preliminary Plat Application and City Review. Staff Recommendation. The West Park Neighborhood preliminary plat application proposes to not construct Cascade Street to the eastern property line which creates non-compliance with BMC 38.400.010.A.2. The applicant has satisfied the variance criteria in BMC 38.250.080.B and provided sufficient documentation and reasoning to support the non-compliance. Based on the information provided with this application, the Director of Transportation and Engineering and City staff support the subdivision variance request. Variance Request 3 – Extension of Water Lily Drive to the southern property line. The applicant is requesting a variance from Sec. 38.400.010.A.2 – Relation to developed areas which denotes that the developer must arrange the streets and alleys to provide for the continuation of streets and alleys between adjacent developed properties when such continuation is necessary for the convenient movement of traffic, effective provision of emergency services and efficient provision of utilities. Applicant Justification - Supporting Evidence for Variance Existing Gravel Pit. The intersection of Water Lily Drive and West Babcock Street is located directly south of an existing gravel pit/borrow area that was excavated by the previous developer. During the planning of this project, extensive geotechnical investigations were completed to consider the construction of building foundations and the extension of Water Lily Drive to the north. These investigations show that this area is not conducive to the construction of foundations or roads. These results are documented in the Geotechnical Study performed as part of, and included with this preliminary plat submittal (reference test pits 10, 11, and 12). As the remnants of the gravel pit still exist we propose an enhanced constructed wetland for this area. Based on the underlying soils in this area, we feel the constructed wetland is the best use for this portion of the project. It will enhance the existing Baxter Creek Corridor providing and the critical linear park corridor connecting Durston Road to West Babcock Street. A letter, from Andy Pilskalns of Castlerock Engineering, specifically addressing this issue is included with this preliminary plat application. Variance Review Criteria – Sec. 38.250.080.B. Per MCA 76-3-506, a variance to this chapter must be based on specific variance criteria, and may not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this chapter. The city must not approve subdivision variances unless it makes findings based upon the evidence presented in each specific case that: 1. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties; 399 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 17 of 41 Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, this requested variance will not have an impact to the public health safety, general welfare or be injurious to other adjoining properties. The presence of the gravel pit in the southwest corner of the property provides topographic and physical conditions restricting the ability to construct a street to the boundary of the property. An extensive Geotechnical Study included in the preliminary plat application shows that the remnants of a gravel pit have created a soil condition that is not conducive to foundations or roads The surrounding road network provides access by West Babcock Street and Durston Road via Laurel Parkway. Local access will be provided by Pond Lily, Vaughn Drive via Laurel Parkway, and Vaughn Drive through the neighboring Lakes at Valley West. 2. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, an undue hardship to the owner would result if strict interpretation of this chapter is enforced; Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, the presence of the gravel pit in the southwest corner of the property provides topographic and physical conditions restricting the ability to construct a street to the boundary of the property creating a hardship to the construction of Water Lily Drive to West Babcock Street. An extensive Geotechnical Study included in the preliminary plat application shows that the remnants of a gravel pit have created a soil condition that is not conducive to foundations or roads. 3. The variance will not cause a substantial increase in public costs; and Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, the request to not extend Water Lily Drive to West Babcock Street will not impact public costs. 4. The variance will not, in any manner, place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of this chapter or with the city's growth policy. Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, outside of the requested variances, the subdivision will be in compliance with the UDC and the Growth Policy. This is demonstrated through the Preliminary Plat Application and City Review. Staff Recommendation. The West Park Neighborhood preliminary plat application proposes to not construct Water Lily Drive to the southern property line which creates non-compliance with BMC 38.400.010.A.2. The applicant has satisfied the variance criteria in BMC 38.250.080.B and provided sufficient documentation and reasoning to support the non-compliance. Based on the information provided with this application, the Director of Transportation and Engineering and City staff support the subdivision variance request. Variance Request 4 – Extension of Water Lily Drive to the southern property line. The applicant is requesting a variance from Sec. 38.410.040.B – Block length which denotes that a block length must not be designed, unless otherwise impractical, to be more than 400 feet in length or less than 300 feet in length. Block lengths may be longer than 400 feet if necessary due 400 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 18 of 41 to topography, the presence of critical lands, access control, or adjacency to existing parks or open space. In no case may a block exceed 1,320 feet in length. Applicant Justification - Supporting Evidence for Variance See applicant justification – supporting evidence for Variance Request 3 above in addition to: Existing Development East of Baxter Creek Corridor. Another consideration is the area to the east of the Baxter Creek corridor is currently occupied by the Springhill Presbyterian Church and an undeveloped commercial node at the intersection of West Babcock Street and Cottonwood Road. As the property develops there will be opportunities to add to the road network between the two parcels helping to reduce the block length. It needs to be considered that over 1300’ of the separation is adjacent to this property. Protection of Critical Lands. BMC 38.410.040.B states: “Block lengths may be longer than 400 feet if necessary due to topography, the presence of critical lands, access control, or adjacency to existing parks or open space.” We believe the critical lands associated with the Baxter Creek corridor provide topographic and physical conditions restricting the construction of Water Lily Drive. This corridor is now a feature of this area providing a north-south pedestrian and bicycle transportation corridor along a pristine wetlands corridor and providing vital connections to the area trails. It needs to be considered that only 325’ of the separation is adjacent to this property. Variance Review Criteria – Sec. 38.250.080.B. Per MCA 76-3-506, a variance to this chapter must be based on specific variance criteria, and may not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this chapter. The city must not approve subdivision variances unless it makes findings based upon the evidence presented in each specific case that: 1. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties; Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, this requested variance will not have an impact to the public health safety, general welfare or be injurious to other adjoining properties. An extensive Geotechnical Study included in the preliminary plat application shows that the remnants of a gravel pit have created a soil condition that is not conducive to foundations or roads. Furthermore, when looking at the two master planned communities surrounding this critical land, neither of them contemplated crossing this land with a road throughout their history. The surrounding road network provides access by West Babcock Street and Durston Road via Laurel Parkway. Local access will be provided by Pond Lily Drive, Vaughn Drive via Laurel Parkway, and Vaughn Drive through the neighboring Lakes at Valley West. An easement for the future extension of Cascade Street will be provided on the final plat if the connection of Cascade Street becomes necessary in the future. Access to the existing Church is provided via 401 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 19 of 41 Cottonwood Road and West Babcock Street. If and when development continues on the east side of the Baxter Creek corridor further access to that area can be considered. 2. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, an undue hardship to the owner would result if strict interpretation of this chapter is enforced; Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, an undue hardship has been placed upon this property by the soil conditions associated with the existing gravel pit located directly north and directly in conflict with the extension of Water Lily Drive. 3. The variance will not cause a substantial increase in public costs; and Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, the request to increase the block length between Cottonwood Road and Pond Lily Drive does not impact public costs. 4. The variance will not, in any manner, place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of this chapter or with the city's growth policy. Criteria is met. Per the applicant’s response, outside of the requested variances, the subdivision will be in compliance with the UDC and the Growth Policy. This is demonstrated through the Preliminary Plat Application and City Review. Staff Recommendation. The West Park Neighborhood preliminary plat application proposes to not construct Water Lily Drive to the southern property line which creates non-compliance with BMC 38.410.040.B. The applicant has satisfied the variance criteria in BMC 38.250.080.B and provided sufficient documentation and reasoning to support the non-compliance. Based on the information provided with this application, the Director of Transportation and Engineering and City staff support the subdivision variance request. SECTION 3 – RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. These conditions are specific to this project. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. The plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and the Uniform Standards for Subdivision Plats (Uniform Standards for Certificates of Survey and Subdivision Plats 24.183.1104 ARM) and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The Final Plat application shall include one (1) signed reproducible copy on a 3 mil or heavier stable base polyester film (or equivalent) and one (1) digital copy in PDF format. The Clerk and Recorder will file the new Conditions of Approval sheet as the last same sized Mylar sheet in the plat set. 402 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 20 of 41 2. The developer must submit with the application for final plat review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plat approval and noted code provisions or other demonstrations of compliance with standards have been satisfactorily addressed. This narrative must be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 3. Simultaneously with filing of the final plat, in conjunction with required or offered dedications, the subdivider (or owner of the property being subdivided if the owner is not the subdivider) shall transfer ownership to the property owners’ association of any open space proposed to be conveyed to the property owners’ association and all its right, title, and interest in any improvements made to such parkland or open space. For the transfer of real property, the subdivider or owner of the property shall submit with the application for final plat a warranty deed or other instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring fee simple ownership to the property owners’ association and associated realty transfer certificate. The subdivider or owner of the property must record the deed or instrument at the time of recording the final plat. For personal property installed upon open space owned by the property owners’ association, the subdivider shall provide an instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring all its rights, title and interest in such improvements including all applicable warranties to such improvements. 4. The applicant is responsible for completing all required documents within the West Park design guidelines and CC&Rs including providing all definitions, exhibits, and appendixes during the final plat application submittal. 5. Pedestrian walks must be maintained by the adjacent property owner or by the property owners' association. The party responsible for the maintenance of pedestrian walks must be identified in the preliminary plat application. Please include this information in the CC&Rs for future pedestrian walks within the West Park Phase 1 Site Plan and future subsequent site plans or subdivisions to ensure these will be maintained accordingly. 6. This notation must be included on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat: This is a known area of high groundwater. No crawl spaces or basements may be constructed. Sump pumps are not allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Sump pumps are not allowed to be connected to the drainage system. Water from sump pumps may not be discharged onto streets, such as into the curb and gutters where they create a safety hazard for pedestrians and vehicles. 7. This notation must be included on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat: Ownership of all common open space areas and trails, and responsibility of maintenance thereof and for city assessments levied on the common open space lands shall be that of the property owners association. Maintenance responsibility shall include, in addition to the common open space and trails, all vegetative ground cover, boulevard trees and irrigation systems in the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external perimeter development streets and as adjacent to public parks or other common open space areas. All areas within the subdivision that are designated herein as common open space 403 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 21 of 41 including trails are for the use and enjoyment by residents of the development and the general public. The property owners association shall be responsible for levying annual assessments to provide for the maintenance, repair, and upkeep of all common open space areas and trails. At the same time of recording the final plat of the subdivision the subdivider shall transfer ownership of all common open space areas within each phase to the property owners association created by the subdivider to maintain all common open space areas within the West Park Subdivision. 8. This notation must be included on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat: In accordance with Section 38.410.040.D BMC, as no continuous length of block may exceed 600 feet without intersecting a street or pedestrian walk, all subsequent site plans or subdivisions for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2 and Lot 1 Block 3 of the West Park Major Subdivision (Amended Plat of Lots R1A, R1B, R1C, and R1D, of Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 6) must be reviewed and found to be in conformance with this provision. 9. This notation must be included on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat: If individual lots deviate from the subdivision phasing plan, the City reserves the right to require alternative timing to the installation of all applicable subdivision infrastructure improvements at the time of plan review for development on the phased lots and will be based upon the utility and transportation infrastructure required to support the proposed intensity of development at the time of plan review. 10. This notation must be included on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat: The maintenance of all stormwater facilities is the responsibility of the property owners association (POA). 11. This notation must be included on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat if parkland has not been fully accepted by the Parks Department prior to final plat approval: Although an easement or parkland dedication is required at the time of Final Plat, the Parks and Recreation Department does not assume maintenance responsibility for parkland and improvements until the following have been completed after Final Plat: 1) the constructed park meets requirements of 38.420.080 and the approved park master plan, 2) all conditions of approval for the subdivision or park master plan are completed, and 3) written acknowledgement of final acceptance has been provided by the City. 12. This notation must be included on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat: Private utilities are not allowed within parkland unless otherwise approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation. 13. A preconstruction meeting with the Parks Division is required prior to any site work within the park area. The applicant must provide final park plans with all parkland improvements proposed and schedule a preconstruction meeting at least 30 days prior to planned commencement of parkland construction. 14. Per Sec. 38.220.020.A, the applicant must contact the Gallatin County Conservation District, Montana Department of Environmental Quality, and U.S. Army Corps of 404 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 22 of 41 Engineers regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.). Any required permits must be obtained by the applicant and provided to the Community Development Department prior to the commencement of any work on the phase being constructed. 15. The applicant must ensure that the Conservation Easement between Norton Ranch Properties, LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers within the City park parcel is transferred to the City of Bozeman with the final plat. 16. The proposed project is located within the service area of the Norton Ranch Lift Station. The capacity of the station is currently fully dedicated. The West Park Neighborhood Subdivision may not exceed the lift station capacity reserved for the subject property (300 units) without an upgrade to the existing lift station and associated force main. 17. The proposed project is located within one-half mile of the intersection of Durston Road and Laurel Parkway. The full West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Traffic Impact Study indicates the subject intersection will not meet the City's level of service standard at full buildout in the design year required per BMC 38.400.060.B.4. The supplemental West Park Neighborhood traffic impact study proposes a phasing plan to satisfy BMC 38.400.060.B.4 during phase 1 and phase 2, and re-evaluate the intersection of Durston Road and Laurel Parkway during phase 3. The West Park Neighborhood Subdivision may not exceed the reserved intersection capacity for the subject property (252 units), or proceed with phase 3 without re-evaluating the subject intersection. The following capacities will be reserved for the first two phases. a. Phase 1: 102 dwelling units b. Phase 2: 120-150 dwelling units 18. If well/irrigation improvements are accepted by Parks Department prior to final plat approval by City Commission, then follow these steps: 1) Complete 602 Form – Notice of completion of exempt groundwater development. The form is completed by developer, then reviewed by the City for completeness/accuracy, and 2) File final plat and warranty deed transferring fee title to parkland. If well/irrigation improvements are financially guaranteed under an IA prior to final plat approval by the City Commission, then follow these steps: 1) File final plat and warranty deed transferring fee title to parkland. 2) Complete well/irrigation improvements. Prior to release of financial security and closeout of IA, developer to complete 602 Form for review by city. SECTION 4 – CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. Sec. 38.100.080.A. Compliance with regulations required. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. Sec. 38.220.060.A.14.b – Irrigation information. The applicant must provide park irrigation information meeting the site plan requirements at whichever comes first: either 405 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 23 of 41 30 days prior to the preconstruction meeting, or with an Improvements Agreement proposal. 3. Sec. 38.220.310.C.1 & E. Property owners association. The property owners' association must be formed before any properties are sold. For a multiphase project, the property owners' association must be created for the entire project with the first phase. Please provide the recorded covenants, conditions, and restrictions for West Park Neighborhood Condominiums prior to final plat approval. 4. Sec. 38.270.030. Completion of improvements. Please provide the following condition of approval related to notice of restrictions due to uninstalled infrastructure to read as follows on the final plat: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all potential purchasers of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2 and Lot 1 Block 3 of the West Park Major Subdivision (Amended Plat of Lots R1A, R1B, R1C, and R1D, of Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 6) City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, that the final plat of the subdivision was approved by the Bozeman City Commission without completion of certain on and off site improvements required under the Bozeman Municipal Code, as is allowed in Chapter 38.270 of the Bozeman Municipal code. As such, this Restriction is filed with the final plat that stipulates that any use of these lots is subject to further subsequent subdivision or site plan review, and no certificate of occupancy shall be granted for these lots until all on and off site improvements are completed as required under the Bozeman Municipal Code. THEREFORE, BE ADVISED, that Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2 and Lot 1 Block 3 of the West Park Major Subdivision (Amended Plat of Lots R1A, R1B, R1C, and R1D, of Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 6), City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana until all required on and off site improvements for the West Park Major Subdivision are completed and accepted by the City of Bozeman in accordance with the accepted Phasing Improvements Plan for West Park Major Subdivision. No building structure requiring water or sewer facilities shall be granted a certificate of occupancy for these lots until the restriction is lifted. This restriction runs with the land and is revocable only by further subdivision, site plan review, or the written consent of the City of Bozeman. 5. Sec. 38.270.030.D. Exception for concurrent construction. In certain circumstances, the issuance of a building permit may be allowed prior to completion of the public infrastructure, provided that the criteria listed in this section are met. Prior to final plat, a concurrent construction plan, addressing all requirements of this section, must be submitted for review and approval of the community development director in consultation with the city engineer and with a recommendation from the development review committee. Additional code provisions applicable to concurrent construction approval are as follows: a. The property owner must enter into an improvements agreement to ensure the installation of required infrastructure and other applicable improvements, to be secured by any security or securities found in section 38.270.080. If a financial 406 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 24 of 41 security is used, the amount will be determined by the city and in an amount not less than 150 percent of the cost of the improvements verified against city publicly bid unit prices, where such are available. If no publicly bid unit prices are available, any cost estimate acceptable to the city may be used. The security must be in the name of the city and must be at least six months longer than the time of performance required by the improvements agreement. b. The approval of the final engineering design, including location and grade, for any public infrastructure must be obtained from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality prior to issuance of any building permit for the development. c. The developer must provide and maintain hazard and commercial general liability insurance. Insurance policies must not be cancelled without at least 45 days prior notice to the city. The commercial general liability policy must name the city as an additional insured. The developer must furnish evidence, satisfactory to the city, of all such policies and the effective dates thereof. d. The developer must execute a hold harmless and indemnification agreement indemnifying, defending and holding harmless the city, its employees, agents and assigns from and against any and all liabilities, loss, claims, causes of action, judgments and damages resulting from or arising out of the issuance of a building permit under this section. 6. Sec. 38.320.030.A. Maximum Lot Area (Net Acres) - The maximum lot area (net acres) for lots in R-4 is 2.5 net acres. Departures from the maximum lot size requirements may be allowed where the planned development fits into the context of the neighborhood and proposed pedestrian and vehicular circulation measures meet community objectives. a. The applicant has submitted a departure from this provision to accommodate greater block and lot sizes within the proposed subdivision. Staff finds the street and pedestrian pathway layout of the proposed subdivision creates corridors with the intention to avoid critical lands and incorporate greater pedestrian access through pathways to be dedicated to the City in subsequent site plan submittals for each phase of development. 7. Sec. 38.400.040.A.2. - Street Names. Street names must be reviewed and approved by the County’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and City’s Engineering Department prior to final plat approval. The applicant must submit written approval from both entities with the final plat application. The applicant is advised to contact Jenny Connelly with the City’s Engineering Department to discuss street naming. As briefly discussed in our meeting on July 14, 2022, Vaughn Drive may need a different street name south of the midblock crossing since it loops back on itself. 8. Sec. 38.410.060. - Easements. a. List all easements and recorded document numbers on the Conditions of Approval Sheet. 407 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 25 of 41 b. Easements for storm water facilities, water mains and sanitary sewer mains, as shown on the preliminary plat, shall be submitted for review and filed prior to the commencement of any work on the site and/or concurrently with the final plat approval, whichever is sooner. c. Drafts must be prepared for review and approval by the city. Executed and signed hard copies of the easements must be submitted to the review engineer for City Commission approval and filing with the county clerk prior to final plat approval. The applicant may contact the review engineer to receive standard templates. 9. Sec. 38.410.130.C.2. Water Adequacy. Water rights or cash-in-lieu of water rights must be provided with any future site plan development or applicable development application. A note must be included in the conditions of approval sheet indicating this information. 10. Sec. 38.550.070. Landscaping of public lands. In accordance with the requirements of BMC 38.550.070, installation by the developer of vegetative ground cover, boulevard trees, and irrigation system in the public right-of-way boulevard strips on perimeter streets and in and adjacent to City park lots and all open space lots is required prior to final plat approval or subject to an improvements agreement. Boulevard improvements are not required until the development of the adjacent lot. 11. Sec. 38.610.090. Wetland permit conditions. Please ensure the requirements for maintenance and monitoring of wetlands on the subject property are provided in conformance to the standards and regulations of the BMC. The City’s Wetlands Review Consultant has provided comments date January 27, 2023 that must be addressed prior to final plat approval. SECTION 5 – RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS The Development Review Committee (DRC) determined the application was sufficient for continued review and recommended approval with conditions and code provisions on December 9, 2022. The Community Development Board acting in its capacity as the Planning Board considered compliance of the application with the growth policy on February 6, 2023, and recommended approval unanimously 5-0 of the consent agenda item. The City Commission is scheduled to review the preliminary plat and make a decision at their February 28, 2023 public meeting. SECTION 6 – STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. 408 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 26 of 41 Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.240.150.B, BMC. In considering applications for subdivision approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1) Compliance with the survey requirements of Part 4 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The preliminary plat was prepared in accordance with the surveying and documentation requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Montana. As noted in the code requirements and Condition 1 and 2, the final plat must comply with State statute, Administrative Rules of Montana, and the Bozeman Municipal Code. 2) Compliance with the local subdivision regulations provided for in Part 5 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The final plat must comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code. The subdivider is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions not specifically listed as a condition of approval, do not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law as denoted in Code Requirement 1. Sections 3 and 4 of this report identify conditions and code provisions necessary to meet all municipal standards. The listed code requirements address necessary documentation and compliance with standards. Therefore, upon satisfaction of all conditions and code corrections the subdivision will comply with the subdivision regulations. 3) Compliance with the local subdivision review procedures provided for in Part 6 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The Bozeman Planning Board public meeting and City Commission public meeting were properly noticed in accordance with the Bozeman Municipal Code. Based on the recommendation of the Development Review Committee (DRC) and other applicable review agencies, as well as any public testimony received on the matter, the City Commission will make the final decision on the subdivider’s request. The subdivider requested review of this subdivision under the terms of 76-3-616 MCA as authorized in 38.240.100. Subdivisions reviewed under the terms of 76-3-616 may include variances or other instances of lack of compliance to standards and procedures to be granted per approval of the City Commission or addressed per code provisions and conditions of approval. The Department of Community Development received a preliminary plat application on May 25, 2022. The DRC reviewed the preliminary plat application and determined the submittal did not contain detailed, supporting information that was sufficient to allow for the continued review of the proposed subdivision on July 5, 2022. A revised application was received on September 2, 2022. The DRC determined the applicant was still not adequate for continued review on October 14, 2022. 409 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 27 of 41 A revised application was received on November 16, 2022. The DRC determined the application was adequate for continued review on December 9, 2022 and recommended conditions of approval and code corrections for the staff report. The City scheduled public notice for this application from January 20, 2023 to February 28, 2023. The applicant posted public notice on the subject property on January 20, 2023. The applicant sent public notice to landowners of record within 200-feet of the subject property via first class mail, on January 18, 2023. Two written public comments have been received as of the writing of this report. All public comments are included in the City’s Laserfiche archive and available to the public. Staff’s analysis and findings related to the submitted public comments are included in Appendix A below. On February 2, 2023 this major subdivision staff report was completed and forwarded with a recommendation of conditional approval for consideration to the Planning Board. The Community Development Board acting in its capacity as the Planning Board considered compliance of the application with the growth policy on February 6, 2023 and recommended approval unanimously 5-0 of the consent agenda item. On February 21, 2023, this staff report was updated and forwarded for review by the City Commission. 4) Compliance with Chapter 38, BMC and other relevant regulations Community Development staff and the DRC reviewed the preliminary plat against all applicable regulations and the application complies with the BMC and all other relevant regulations with conditions and code corrections. This report includes Conditions of Approval and required code provisions as recommended by the DRC for consideration by the City Commission to complete the application processing for final plat approval. All municipal water and sewer facilities will conform to the regulations outlined by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality and the requirements of the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. Water/sewer - The subdivision will not significantly burden city water and sewer infrastructure with the recommended conditions of approval and code provisions. The required design report has been provided. Formal plans and specifications have been prepared and reviewed within this preliminary plat submittal. According to the Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation (DNRC), existing water rights are associated with the subject property. The proposed subdivision would eliminate the irrigated pasture and no longer require the water rights for this use. However, there will be no impact or alteration of the sources of any water rights. The applicant intends to pay cash-in-lieu of water rights at the time of site plan approval for each lot per code provision 9. The proposed project is located within the service area of the Norton Ranch Lift Station and its capacity is fully dedication. Per condition 16, this proposed subdivision may not exceed the lift station capacity reserved for the subject property (300 units) without an upgrade to the existing lift station and associated force main. 410 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 28 of 41 Easements - The final plat must provide and depict all necessary utilities and required utility easements. Code provision 8 requires that all easements, existing and proposed, must be accurately depicted and addressed on the final plat and in the final plat application. Public utilities will be located within dedicated street right of ways. Additional required easements include storm drain, sanitary sewer, and pedestrian pathways to ensure public safety over the course of the full build out. All easements must be provided using the City’s standard language. Parks – The proposed subdivision will be meeting their required parkland through a combination of land dedication and cash-in-lieu of parkland. 4.51 acres of dedicated parkland is being proposed, which leaves a shortage of 0.56 acres. The remaining 0.56 acres will be provided as improvements-in-lieu of parkland. Additionally, 6.99 acres of wetlands, ponds, or streams will be preserved on site and within the parkland network. There are several parks within a 10 minute walk from the proposed development and a few of the largest include: the Lakes at Valley West, Valley West Park, Norton East Park, and Bronken Park. The proposed park is located adjacent to Bronken Park and the Lakes at Valley West to create a continuous parkland experience and recreation trail network. Subsequent development will come in as 2 phases that will provide improvements-in-lieu to the proposed parkland. These improvements include a north/south Class II trail along Baxter Creek that connects to the existing Bronken Park trail network; a central node comprised of seating, a shade structure, children’s playground, picnic area, and climbing feature; and a reconstructed wetland with trails, native plantings, and seating that will expand the greater Baxter Creek. Phase 1 is proposed as concurrent construction with this proposed development, so the proposed parkland will include Phase 1 improvements. Phase 1 improvements are comprised of enhancing the reconstructed wetland and providing a Class II north/south trail. There are five conditions and code provisions related to park area requirements, cash donation and infrastructure donation in lieu of land dedication, and park development. Condition 11 requires a note on the final plat if the proposed parkland has not been fully accepted by the Parks Department prior to its approval to ensure that the developer completes the requirements of the code and the City’s design standards prior to our assumption of maintenance on the parkland. Condition 12 requires a note on the final plat regarding the allowance of private utilities within parkland to ensure private utilities may not be on public land unless otherwise approved by the City. Condition 13 requires a preconstruction meeting with the Parks Division prior to commencement of parkland construction. This provision will help the applicant to follow the correct construction process with the City. Condition 18 provides the processing for well and irrigation improvements dependent on if installed by the developer and accepted by the Parks Department or if guaranteed by the developer prior to final plat approval by the City Commission to ensure the appropriate forms are filed with the DNRC. Lastly, code provision 2 denotes that park irrigation information must be provide prior to the preconstruction meeting or with an improvements agreements to ensure it meets the site plan requirements and is acceptable 411 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 29 of 41 by the Parks Department. The proposal meets the required park dedication and improvement standards with conditions and code provisions. Stormwater - The subdivision will construct storm water control facilities to conform to municipal code and design standards. A stormwater management plan was submitted and reviewed by the Engineering Division with this preliminary plat. Stormwater runoff from the right of ways will be directed as street runoff to inlets and then conveyed to stormwater retention ponds for storage and treatment. The stormwater from the individual sites will be addressed with each individual site as part of the site plan review process. The maintenance of stormwater facilities is the responsibility of the property owner’s association as denoted in Condition 10. Agricultural water user facility - There are no active agricultural water user facilities on the subject property. An abandon “agricultural drain/man-made canal” runs along the west side of Baxter Creek. This relic irrigation feature was previously investigated last year and there is no source of flow to the ditch on the south side and no outflow on the north side of the canal. A headgate and culvert pipe are located in the mid-section of the ditch and are non-operational. A small “private” irrigation ditch is in proximity to the subject property. Based on the “private” status, there is no irrigation ditch company to provide discontinuance information. Concurrent construction - The applicant requested concurrent construction per BMC 38.270.030.D. Code provision 5 requires the applicant to provide concurrent construction approval prior to final plat approval as well as appropriate improvements agreement applications for required infrastructure and landscaping. An approved concurrent construction plan from the DRC will allow the applicant to complete the required improvements with an improvements agreement within two years of the date of final plat approval. Condition 9 is provided to allow for the City to require alternative timing for the installation of subdivision infrastructure improvements if there are changes to the subdivision phasing or intensity of development. Code provision 10 requires that landscaping for boulevard strips and open space lots are guaranteed or installed prior to final plat approval. The installation of boulevard trees and landscaping will be phased based on the proposed phasing plan to allow for flexibility in the development proposal. Per code provision 4, the lots are restricted until all on and off site improvements are completed and accepted by the City of Bozeman in accordance with the accepted Phasing Improvements Plan for the proposed subdivision. Police/Fire – The City of Bozeman’s Police and Fire emergency response area includes this subject property. The subdivision does not impact the City’s ability to provide emergency services to the subject property. The necessary addresses will be provided to enable 911 response to individual homes prior to recording of the final plat. Fire protection standards require installation of fire hydrants at designated spacing to ensure adequate protection. 412 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 30 of 41 5) The provision of easements to and within the subdivision for the location and installation of any necessary utilities The final plat will provide and depict all necessary utilities and required utility easements. Code requirement No. 8, requires that all easements, existing and proposed, must be accurately depicted and addressed on the final plat and in the final plat application. Public utilities are located within dedicated street right of ways. 6) The provision of legal and physical access to each parcel within the subdivision and the notation of that access on the applicable plat and any instrument transferring the parcel The final plat will provide legal and physical access to each parcel within the subdivision. All of the proposed lots will have frontage on public streets constructed to City standards with lot frontage meeting minimum standards shown on the preliminary plat. 38.220.060 Documentation of compliance with adopted standards The Development Review Committee (DRC) completed a subdivision pre-application plan review on February 10, 2021 and four subdivision variances were requested as denoted here. The applicant requested and was granted waivers for Wildlife, and Agriculture. Staff offers the following summary comments on the documents required with Article 38.220.060, BMC. 38.220.060.A.1 – Surface water This subdivision will not significantly impact surface water. Baxter Creek flows through the eastern portion of the proposed subdivision and is the only natural surface water located on the subject property. A total of five wetlands are located on the property and delineated Wetland 4, located adjacent to Baxter Creek, is the only one of jurisdictional status. An abandon irrigation ditch also runs along a portion of Baxter Creek and the fringe wetlands in this area. A covenant of dedication for a wetland conservation easement was previously established between Norton Properties LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers to protect this watercourse and restrict this area from certain development. Where intact wetlands and watercourses are present setbacks have been delineated and identified pursuant to BMC 38.410.100. Watercourse setback plantings are included in the landscaping plans for the proposed park. Plantings are required to be installed or financially guaranteed with final plat. The applicant has also requested two subdivision variances in order to conform to the provisions of the conservation easement and avoid impacting the area. One of the non-jurisdictional wetlands, Wetlands 3, is located north central to the subject property and will be impacted by the construction of Block 1, Lot 1, and Block 1, Lot 2. Due to dewatering from the borrow pit located on the southeast portion of the property, this wetland artificially expanded from 1.25 acres to 2.49 acres from its original delineation in 2006 to 2021. The applicant is proposing to recreate the 2.49 acres of wetlands near the borrow pit in the southeast corner of the subject property and provide for an enhanced pond feature as a 413 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 31 of 41 component of the dedicated parklands. The proposed mitigated wetlands and enhancements to the borrow pit will continue as a wildlife habitat and offer a biological connection to the Wetlands 4 located near this area. Additionally, this will provide recreation opportunities to the community. The remainder of the proposed West Park Subdivision would be designed to avoid impacts to all other delineated features on the subject property. This includes Wetlands 1 and Wetlands 5 which are located in a proposed open space lot (Block 2, Open Space 1) and a portion of which is also under the same wetlands conservation easement previously mentioned. This easement must be transferred to the City of Bozeman with the final plat per code provision 15 to ensure the City has to ability to consent to any changes in this area with the dedication of the parklands. Additionally, code provision 11 requires the applicant to address wetlands monitoring and maintenance for existing wetlands and mitigated wetlands on the subject property in conformance with Division 38.610 of the BMC. Applicable permits required must be submitted prior to any site work for the phase being constructed on the subject property, per Condition 14. 38.220.060.A.2 - Floodplains The applicant submitted a flood hazard analysis report with this proposed preliminary plat which was evaluated by the Engineering Division and found to be in conformance with Division 38.600. This report indicated that there is no defined floodplain associated with Baxter Creek or any other components of the subject property as mapped by FEMA. As previously denoted, The Baxter Creek corridor is located in a wetland conservation easement which limits certain development activity along this corridor which would avoid floodplain impacts to the developable land within the proposed subdivision. The width of the flood hazard area varies between 40 to 130 feet and in fully contained within the conservation easement and watercourse setbacks denoted in Sec. 38.410.100.A.2. The flood hazard area will not impact any aspects of the proposed development. 38.220.060.A.3 – Groundwater A geotechnical site evaluation was completed in March 2021 and included seven test pits across the entire West Park development. A memo detailing groundwater flow modeling was completed in April 2022 with updates in August 2022 and October 2022. Across the seven monitoring wells, the depth to groundwater was generally at its shallowest in late May and ranged from 0.33 feet to 2.64 feet below ground surface. Groundwater was generally at its deepest level in late September/early October with groundwater levels between 1.69 feet and 3.54 feet below ground surface. With the limited data provided for the subject property, it appears groundwater levels fluctuate at or less than approximately two feet throughout the calendar year. The Engineering Division has determined that the site is in an area of high groundwater which may negatively impact future structures or cause illicit discharges into the sanitary sewer and over burden the surface drainage system. Condition 6 on the plat prohibits use of basements or crawl spaces unless a professional engineer certifies that the structure has been designed in such a way to accommodate seasonal high groundwater. This requirement will protect both future structure owners from future hazards of flooding and lessen burden on the public from illicit discharges. 414 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 32 of 41 38.220.060.A.4 - Geology, Soils and Slopes A field investigation of the subject property was conducted in 2020 and recommendations for the development of the subject property were included in the report. Based on the investigation, there are no known natural geologic hazards on the site. The report denotes that there was previous mining activity in the southeast quadrant of the proposed subdivision, the majority of which is located within the proposed park, while a portion is within Block 3, Lot 1. The report recommends further geotechnical investigation be completed to determine the extent of the mining activity and to develop recommendations for building on the mining disturbed area if any roads or buildings are proposed for the disturbed area on Block 3, Lot 1. There are no unusual features on the site. The site has high groundwater but that is typical of most areas being developed in Bozeman and as such is not unusual. Condition 6 as previously mentioned will address concerns with seasonal high groundwater. There are no slopes greater than 15% on the site. A soil map and NRCS soil information was included in the submitted geotechnical report. Due to the known high groundwater and soil conditions within the proposed area of development, an increased rate of corrosion has been observed with ductile iron water mains, thus decreasing the longevity of publicly owned and maintained infrastructure. The Engineering Department has provided informational comments to the applicant regarding corrosion protection required for future water mains within the development. Corrosion protection must be addressed prior to the infrastructure approval associated with this development. It is not anticipated that cuts or fills will exceed three feet on the subject property. 38.220.060.A.5 - Vegetation The applicant provided a memorandum and map regarding vegetation. All critical plant communities will be protected as they reside within an area of the proposed subdivision that is protected by a restrictive wetland protection covenants. A noxious weed management and revegetation plan was approved by the Gallatin County Weed District in accordance with the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act (MCA 7-22- 21) for the control of noxious weeds and was submitted with the preliminary plat application. 38.220.060.A.6 - Wildlife This subdivision will not significantly impact wildlife as no critical wildlife species or habitats are known to be found on the subject property. A waiver for wildlife was granted during the Pre- Application process. 38.220.060.A.7 - Agriculture This subdivision will not impact agriculture as the subject property has been found to not be a viable farm unit. A waiver for agriculture was granted during the Pre-Application process. 38.220.060.A.8 - Agricultural Water User Facilities See discussion above. 415 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 33 of 41 38.220.060.A.9 - Water and Sewer The subdivision will not significantly impact city water and sewer infrastructure. Water and sewer improvements will be designed to meet City of Bozeman Standards and State Department of Environmental Quality Standards and Regulations. See discussion above under primary review criteria for further details. 38.220.060.A.10 - Stormwater Management The subdivision will not significantly impact stormwater infrastructure. See discussion above under primary review criteria. 38.220.060.A.11 - Streets, Roads and Alleys The subdivision will not significantly impact the City’s street infrastructure and will provide adequate improvements to support the development and the existing neighborhoods by completing the street grid in the area with conditions, code provisions, and subdivision variances. The proposed subdivision is bordered by West Babcock Street to the south, Laurel Parkway to the west, and has access to Vaughn Drive to the north. The internal subdivision roads will consist of the extension of Vaughn Drive from Laurel Parkway to the end of Block 1, Lot 1 (Phase 1), the remaining portion of Vaughn Drive from its current terminus connecting to Laurel Parkway (Phase 2) and the extension of Pond Lily Road from West Babcock Street to its proposed connection to Vaughn Drive (Phase 3). This proposed subdivision will include City standard 5’ wide sidewalks along all street frontages increasing the pedestrian connectivity in the area as a whole. This includes pedestrian facilities along West Babcock Street, Laurel Parkway as well as along both sides of Vaughn Drive and Pond Lily Road. Midblock pedestrian pathways are proposed throughout the proposed subdivision. For Phase 1, this includes a midblock pedestrian pathway through the middle of Block 1 going east-west and in the open space between Block 1, Lot 1 and Block 1, Lot 2 going north-south. For Phases 2, east-west and north-south pedestrian pathways will be provided on Block 2, Lot 1. For Phase 3, an east-west pedestrian pathway will be provided on Block 3 Lot 1. Final locations and configurations of these pathways will be completed as part of the site plans for each lot. These pedestrian pathways will be 5’ wide sidewalks located in 30’ wide easements. Please see Sec. 38.220.060.A.14 below for details on additional pedestrian facilities located in the proposed park. Per Condition 5, pedestrian pathways must be maintained by the property owners' association which must be denoted in the CC&Rs for future pedestrian pathways within the West Park Phase 1 Site Plan and future subsequent site plans prior to final plat approval. Additionally, these pedestrian pathways are required in order to support the submitted departure per code provision 6 to Sec. 38.320.030.A. which denotes that the maximum lot area (net acres) for lots in R-4 is 2.5 net acres and departures from the maximum lot size requirements may be allowed where the planned development fits into the context of the neighborhood and proposed pedestrian and vehicular circulation measures meet community objectives. Staff finds the street and pedestrian pathway layout of the proposed subdivision creates corridors with the intention to avoid critical lands and 416 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 34 of 41 incorporates greater pedestrian access through the proposed dedicated pathways to be dedicated to the City in subsequent site plan submittals for each phase of development. Code provision 7 requires that that all street naming proposed in the preliminary plat is reviewed and approved by the County’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and City’s Engineering Department prior to final plat approval to ensure accuracy in street naming protocols and orientations. The existing platted subdivision, Norton East Ranch Phase 6, includes road easements that vary in location from the proposed roads in this proposal and as such will need to be vacated prior to filing of the final plat for the West Park Subdivision. Additionally, the existing subdivision includes an easement to extend Cascade Street to the east boundary of the property in line with an existing easement on the adjacent property. The proposed subdivision includes this easement in a slightly different location but still in line with the existing easement to the east. It is noted that there is a covenant placed on the subject property by the original developer in cooperation with the Army Corp of Engineers to protect wetlands which may make construction of this future road difficult. The applicant has submitted 2 subdivision variances related to this street connection as detailed in Section 2 above. A traffic impact study (TIS) was provided by the applicant for the proposed subdivision. The TIS was reviewed by the Engineering Department have been found to meet City standards for peak trip generation and level of service with conditions. As detailed in the traffic study, the project is anticipated to produce up to 2,376 new daily traffic trips when fully built out at 500 units. The report indicates that the intersection of Durston Road and Laurel Parkway will not meet the City's level of service standard at full buildout in the design year required per BMC 38.400.060.B.4. The supplemental West Park Neighborhood traffic impact study proposes a phasing plan to satisfy BMC 38.400.060.B.4 during Phase 1 and Phase 2, and re-evaluate the intersection during Phase 3. Per Condition 17, The West Park Neighborhood Subdivision may not exceed the reserved intersection capacity for the subject property (252 units), or proceed with phase 3 without re-evaluating the subject intersection. The proposed subdivision is bordered on the south and west with streets that incorporate bike lanes. No additional bike specific infrastructure is proposed for the subject property. There are no arterial streets located adjacent to the development. The only modification to an existing street is to modify Vaughn Drive at its current end point. No gravel alleys are proposed and as such, no dust control provisions are provided. Maintenance of the proposed streets will be completed by the City of Bozeman. Traffic calming curb bulbs are planned for the intersection of Vaughn Drive and Pond Lily Road and on Vaughn Drive at the park pedestrian access at the future location of the extension of Cascade Street. These traffic calming devices are shown on the preliminary plat with additional detail provided with the infrastructure plan submittal. 417 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 35 of 41 38.220.060.A.12 – Non-Municipal Utilities The applicant has received confirmation of future service from Northwestern Energy and communication providers. 38.220.060.A.13 - Land Use The subdivision application has provided future land use data consistent with the R-4 zoning district and the community plan. 21.51 acres is proposed as developable residential lots, 4.46 acres as open space areas, 11.52 acres as parks, and 3.34 acres as right-of-way. The proposed uses of apartments and townhouses are allowed within the R-4 zoning district. For a multi-phase project such as this proposed subdivision, the BMC requires a property owners’ association to be formed for the entire project with the first phase per code provision 3. In addition to this requirement, per condition of approval 4, the applicant must provide completed covenants, conditions, and restrictions for West Park Neighborhood prior to final plat approval. The association owns and is responsible for the maintenance of any open spaces within the proposed subdivision per Conditions 3 and 7. 38.220.060.A.14 - Parks and Recreation Facilities See above discussion under primary review criteria. 38.220.060.A.15 - Neighborhood Center Plan The subdivision is exempt from providing a neighborhood center plan per Sec. 38.410.020 as every lot is within a half mile of an existing neighborhood center to the south of the subject property located in Norton East Ranch Phase 1. 38.220.060.A.16 - Lighting Plan A lighting plan is only required where lights are proposed other than within the street right-of- ways. There are no subdivision lights proposed outside of the street right-of-ways. The proposed location of lights within the right-of-ways are shown on the preliminary plat drawing. 38.220.060.A.17 – Miscellaneous There are public lands adjacent to or within 200 feet of all sides of the proposed subdivision which are all City parklands. The subdivision will not have any negative effect on access to these public lands. The proposed development will provide additional access to the Baxter Creek corridor park through the construction of trails within the proposed park and a connecting trail to the Baxter Creek corridor park. There is no current mining, high pressure gas lines, structures or high voltage power lines on the subject property. As noted in the geotechnical investigation, the mining that has previously occurred on the southeast corner of the subject property presents a potential hazard for the construction of buildings or roads if the mined area is not remediated prior to such construction. This concern is only associated with a portion of Lot 1, Block 3. The proposed subdivision is not located within a delineated Wildland Urban Interface area. 418 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 36 of 41 38.220.060.A.18 - Affordable Housing This application does not rely on incentives authorized in 38.380. Therefore, no analysis is required. 38.220.060.A.19 – Growth Policy Please see Appendix A denoted below for an analysis of the proposed subdivision advances to the adopted growth policy. APPENDIX A – PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned R-4, Residential High Density District. The intent of the R-4 residential high density district is to provide for high-density residential development through a variety of housing types within the city with associated service functions. This purpose is accomplished by: 1) Providing for minimum lot sizes in developed areas consistent with the established development patterns while providing greater flexibility for clustering lots and mixing housing types in newly developed areas. 2) Providing for a variety of compatible housing types, including single and multi- household dwellings to serve the varying needs of the community’s residents. 3) Allowing office use as a secondary use, measured by percentage of total building area. Use of this zone is appropriate for areas adjacent to mixed-use districts, commercial districts, and/or served by transit to accommodate a higher density of residents in close proximity to jobs and services. This purpose is accomplished by Adopted Growth Policy Designation: Table 4 of the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 shows the correlation between future land use map designations and implementing zoning districts. (See below for the Table) The subject property is designated as Urban Neighborhood. This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. This proposed subdivision is well-suited to implement the Urban Neighborhood by providing lots that will support a variety of housing types including townhouses and multi-household units in an existing developed residential area that is predominantly detached single-household units, two-household dwellings, and rowhomes. The multi-household lots will support the construction of “missing middle” housing which is contemplated throughout the Bozeman Community Plan 419 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 37 of 41 2020. The proposed subdivision is also located near existing commercial areas known as Billion Auto Plaza and Ferguson Farms Subdivision to the southeast as well as a partially developed, commercial area in the Valley West Subdivision and J & D Family Major Subdivision to the south. The added density adjacent to these commercial centers will add demand for further development of these B-1 and B-2 zoned areas to the south. The growth policy encourages development to be walkable, which is defined in the glossary as: Walkable. A walkable area has: • A center, whether it’s a main street or a public space. • People: Enough people for businesses to flourish and for public transit to run frequently. • Parks and public space: Functional and pleasant public places to gather and play. • Pedestrian design: Buildings are close to the street, parking lots are relegated to the back. • Schools and workplaces: Close enough that walking to and from home to these destinations is realistic. 420 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 38 of 41 • Complete streets: Streets designed for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit. With the complexity of features needed to create a walkable environment, no one site is likely to provide all the needed elements. The additional density will help provide for element two with potential for additional persons in the area. A park is proposed along the eastern portion of the subject property and pedestrian routes proposed through and around the development. This site is an additional phase of development for the overall Norton East Ranch Subdivision, surrounded by existing and entitled residential uses to the west, south, and north with complimentary uses such as schools, church, parks, an entitled grocery store, and employment opportunities within a relatively short distance. There are no adopted development standards relating to the walk score. The proposed development is adjacent to Adam Bronken Park and Soccer Complex, which provides a variety of recreational opportunities from natural walking trails and sports fields in addition to the proposed parklands which will serve as an extension of this area. The closest grocery stores are Whole Foods and Rosauers Supermarkets which are on Huffine Road roughly 3.0 miles from the proposed development. There is an approved Site Plan on recorded for Town & Country Foods to be developed on Fallon Street roughly 1.7 miles from the proposed development. The two closest schools are the Petra Academy and Meadowlark Elementary School which are both within 1.5 miles of the proposed development. The Streamline Goldline has a stop on Ferguson Avenue and West Babcock Street, Ferguson Avenue and Cascade Street, and North Ferguson Avenue and Durston Street, which is within 0.8 miles to 1.8 miles away from the proposed development. There are also a variety of restaurants, automobile sales, retail, and office uses along South Cottonwood, Huffine Line, and Fallon Street, a relatively short distance from the proposed development which may provide employment opportunities nearby. The proposed subdivision meets the following Bozeman Community Plan 2020 goals: N-1.1 Promote housing diversity, including missing middle housing. N-1.5 Encourage neighborhood focal point development with functions, activities, and facilities that can be sustained over time. Maintain standards for placement of community focal points and services within new development. N-1.7 Review and where appropriate, revise block and lot design standards, including orientation for solar power generation throughout city neighborhoods. N-1.8 Install, replace, and maintain missing or damaged sidewalks, trails, and shared use paths N-1.10 Increase connectivity between parks and neighborhoods through continued trail and sidewalk development. Prioritize closing gaps within the network. N-1.11 Enable a gradual and predictable increase in density in developed area over time. 421 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 39 of 41 N-2.3 Investigate and encourage development of commerce concurrent with, or soon after, residential development. Actions, staff, and budgetary resources relating to neighborhood commercial development should be given a high priority. N-3.8 Promote the development of “Missing Middle” housing (townhouses, multi-household). N-4.2 Incorporate features, in both public and private projects, to provide organization, structure, and landmarks as Bozeman grows. DCD-1.2 Remove regulatory barriers to infill. DCD-1.5 Identify underutilized sites, vacant, and undeveloped sites for possible development or redevelopment, including evaluating possible development incentives. DCD-1.12 Prioritize the acquisition and/or preservation of open space that supports community values, addresses gaps in functionality and needs, and does not impede development of the community. DCD-3.1 Expand multimodal accessibility between districts and throughout the City as a means of promoting personal and environmental health, as well as reducing automobile dependency. DCD-3.2 Identify missing links in the multimodal system, prioritize those most beneficial to complete, and pursue funding for completion of those links. DCD-3.3 Identify major existing and future destinations for biking and walking to aid in prioritization of route planning and completion. M-1.11 Prioritize and construct key sidewalk connections and enhancements. M2.5 Develop safe crossings along priority and high utilization pedestrian and biking corridors. APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Background and Description A preliminary plat application by the applicant, Tyler Steinway, Intrinsik Architecture, 106 East Babcock Street Suite 1A, Bozeman, MT 59715, and the representative, Greg Stratton, Kilday & Stratton, 2880 Technology Boulevard West, Suite 271, Bozeman, Montana, 59719 representing the property owner, Patrick Eibs, 8FC, LLC, PO Box 11366, Bozeman, Montana, 59719. APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the close of the public comment period/City Commission public meeting per BMC 38.220.420, The City scheduled public notice for this application on January 20, 2023 to February 28, 2023. The applicant posted a public notice on the subject property on January 20, 2023. The City sent public notice to all landowners of record within 200-feet of the subject property via first class mail, on January 18, 2023. Two written public comments have been received as of the writing of this report. All public comments are included in the City’s Laserfiche archive and available to the public. 422 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 40 of 41 One public commenter expressed concerns that this subdivision will cause increased traffic along Laurel Parkway and Vaughn Drive. The potential impact of this traffic through the existing Lakes at Valley West Subdivision to the north poses concerns for existing pedestrian activity within the parks and open spaces along Laurel Parkway, and will limit the ability of both Laurel Parkway and Vaughn Drive from accommodating two-way traffic and on-street parking. The commenter stated that this may also impact accessibility for emergency services and denoted the applicant should consider during the Phase 2 site planning that traffic flow should be directed to Laurel Parkway or West Babcock Street. The commenter also denoted that a decrease in the speed limit in the area would be appropriate for pedestrian safety for patrons of the parklands along Laurel Parkway. Based on Staff’s review of the proposed application, Vaughn Drive is a local street with a 60’ right of way. The proposed design of Vaughn Drive meets the City’s design standards and accommodates on-street parking. Laurel Parkway is a collector street with a 90’ right of way. The existing design of Laurel Parkway meets the City’s design standards. The other public commenter suggested that the northern portion of the proposed West Park Subdivision should include the open space currently allocated adjacent to the intersection of West Babcock Street and Laurel Parkway to create a buffer between the two subdivisions. This commenter denotes that as recently proposed apartment complexes have been developed near commercial areas and main roadways, the proposed apartments and multi-household development allowed in the subdivision should be developed further away from the Lakes at Valley West such as along West Babcock Street with housing types such as single to four household dwellings, townhouses and rowhouses to be developed along the northern portion of the subject property. Both commenters denoted that this approach would allow for an appropriate transition between the newly proposed subdivision zoned R-4 and the existing single household subdivision zoned R-1. Per 38.220.060.A.13 and Appendix A of this staff report, the proposed preliminary plat has provided future land use data consistent with the R-4 zoning district and the community plan. The proposed uses of apartments and townhouses are allowed within this zoning district. The BMC does not have provisions for the buffering or transitioning between R-1 and R-4 zoning districts nor regulations for the placement of open space as denoted within the public comments. Additionally, the BMC does not have provisions in which require the specific placement of certain housing types within a neighborhood. 423 22178 Staff Report for West Park Neighborhood Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Variances Page 41 of 41 APPENDIX D – OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Patrick Eibs, 8FC, LLC, PO Box 11366, Bozeman, Montana, 59719 Applicant: Tyler Steinway, Intrinsik Architecture, 106 East Babcock Street Suite 1A, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representative: Greg Stratton, Kilday & Stratton, 2880 Technology Boulevard West, Suite 271, Bozeman, Montana, 59719 Report By: Nakeisha Lyon, Associate Planner FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this subdivision. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed digitally at https://www.bozeman.net/departments/community-development/planning/project-information-portal , select the “Project Documents Folder” link and navigate to application #22178, as well as digitally at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Application materials – Available through the Laserfiche archive, the full file is linked below. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?startid=262082&cr=1 This project can be viewed on the Community Development Viewer interactive map directly with this link: https://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=planning&FILE_NUMBER=22-178 Public Comment (not applicable at this time): https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=229372&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN 424 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Lynn Hyde, Planner Nakeisha Lyon, Planner Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Erin George, Deputy Director of Community Development Anna Bentley, Director of Community Development SUBJECT:Public Hearing and Decision for Preliminary Plat for the Urban Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision, Application 22082 (Quasi-Judicial) MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Quasi-Judicial RECOMMENDATION:Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22082 and move to approve the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: The Department of Community Development received a Preliminary Plat application on March 4, 2022 requesting to subdivide 8.73 acres to create 31 residential lots, 4 common open space lots and 1 public park lot. The site is currently vacant. The property will have access from the continuation of Fallon Street to the east, and South Reliance Avenue and South Eldorado Avenue to the north. The property is zoned R-5. On January 10, 2023 the Development Review Committee (DRC) found the application sufficient for continued review and recommends approval with the conditions and code provisions identified in this report. The subdivider did not request any subdivision or zoning variances with this application. The City did not receive any written public comment on the application as of the writing of this report. 425 The final decision for this preliminary plat must be made by March 2, 2023. The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Planning Board, considered the application at their February 6, 2023 meeting and the motion recommending approval passed unanimously 5-0. The link to the meeting is here. The Board votes on the item at 18:30 The full application for Urban + Farm Phase 1 is here. No public comment has been received to date. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:There are no unresolved issues with this application. ALTERNATIVES:1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions and code provisions. 2. Approve the application with clarifications and/or corrections or minor modifications to the staff-recommended conditions and applicable code provisions. 3. Deny the application based on the Commission's findings of non- compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the subdivider to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS:There are no identified fiscal effects to the city. Attachments: 22082 Urban Farm Phase 1 PP Commission Staff Report Final.pdf Report compiled on: February 13, 2023 426 City Commission Findings of Fact and Order Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat; 22082 Page 1 of 23 City Commission Findings of Fact and Order Staff Report for the Urban + Farm 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat; Application No. 22082 Public Hearing Dates: City Commission public hearing will be held Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 6:00 pm Project Description: A major preliminary plat subdivision application of 8.73 acres that includes 31 residential lots, 4 common open space lots, and 1 public park lot. Project Location: The property is legally described as Lot R2A of Norton East Ranch Subdivision, Phase 4 located in the NE ¼ of the SW ¼ of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Staff Finding: The application conforms to standards and is sufficient for approval with conditions and code provisions. Recommended City Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22082 and move to approve the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Report Date: February 16, 2023 Staff Contact: Lynn Hyde, Development Review Planner Cody Flammond, Project Engineer Agenda Item Type: Action (Quasi-judicial) 427 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is based on the application materials submitted and public comment received to date. The application materials are available in the City’s Laserfiche archive and may be accessed through the Community Development viewer as well. No public comments have been received as of the writing of this report. Should written public comments be received they will be included in the City’s Laserfiche archive and available to the public. Unresolved Issues. There are no unresolved issues with this application. Project Summary The Department of Community Development received a Preliminary Plat application on March 4, 2022 requesting to subdivide 8.73 acres to create 31 residential lots, 4 common open space lots and 1 public park lot. The site is currently vacant. The property will have access from the continuation of Fallon Street to the east, and South Reliance Avenue and South Eldorado Avenue to the north. The property is zoned R-5. On January 10, 2023 the Development Review Committee (DRC) found the application sufficient for continued review and recommends approval with the conditions and code provisions identified in this report. The subdivider did not request any subdivision or zoning variances with this application. The City did not receive any written public comment on the application as of the writing of this report. The final decision for this preliminary plat must be made by March 2, 2023. The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Planning Board, considered the application at their February 6, 2023 meeting and the motion recommending approval passed unanimously 5-0. The link to the meeting is here. The Board votes on the item at 18:30. No public comment has been received to date. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions and code provisions. 2. Approve the application with clarifications and/or corrections or minor modifications to the staff-recommended conditions and applicable code provisions. 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the subdivider to supply additional information or to address specific items. 428 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 3 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 Unresolved Issues. .............................................................................................................. 2 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1 – MAP SERIES .......................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES ................................................................................. 9 SECTION 3 – RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ............................................ 9 SECTION 4 – CODE REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 10 SECTION 5 – RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ............................................ 13 SECTION 6 – STAFF ANALYSIS and findings ......................................................................... 14 Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.240.150.B, BMC. .......................... 14 38.220.060 Documentation of compliance with adopted standards ................................. 16 APPENDIX A – PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY..................................... 19 APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 22 APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ......................................................... 22 APPENDIX D – OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF ................................. 23 FISCAL EFFECTS ....................................................................................................................... 23 ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 23 429 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 4 of 23 SECTION 1 – MAP SERIES Exhibit 1 – Zoning 430 City Commission Findings of Fact and Order Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat; 22082 Page 5 of 23 Exhibit 2 – Community Plan 2020 Future Land Use 431 City Commission Findings of Fact and Order Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat; 22082 Page 6 of 23 Exhibit 3 – Current Land Use 432 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 7 of 23 Exhibit 4 – Preliminary Plat 433 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 8 of 23 Exhibit 5 – Landscaping Plan 434 City Commission Findings of Fact and Order Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat; 22082 Page 9 of 23 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES The subdivider did not request any subdivision or zoning variances with this preliminary plat application. SECTION 3 – RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. These conditions are specific to this project. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. In accordance with BMC 38.240.100, the applicant has chosen review of this subdivision under the terms of 76-3-623 MCA; therefore, the applicant is obligated to complete the construction of the approved subdivision in accordance with the approved application and any applicable requirements in Montana law, administrative rules, municipal code, and design standards. 2. The final plat must contain the following notations on the conditions of approval sheet, as well as it must be placed within the property owners covenants conditions and restrictions: a. In order to meet the density requirements found within the R-5 zoning district, the lots legally described as Block 2, Lot 1-10 are set aside for multi-household development. These lots must be developed with a minimum of four units each on lots 1-5 and 7-10 and seven units each on lot 6 (or as otherwise required by the zoning district at the time of site plan application in order to ensure the entire subdivision reaches the minimum density threshold of eight dwelling units per acre in the R-5 zoning district). b. Block 1, Lot 1-10 and Block 2, Lot 1-4 are designed to orient the front of the lot and future buildings towards Open Space A & Open Space C. Future development is required to place the functional front of the building and primary façade towards the Open Space. Set backs will be determined with the northern lot line as the front setback, and the southern setback treated as an alley. In addition to homes fronting on the Common Open Space, each home is required to have a pedestrian connection from the primary/northern facing façade towards the east west pedestrian pathway that runs through the Open Space A & C. c. Block 1, Lot 11-21 and Block 2, Lot 7-10 have vehicular access from the northern alley, Planter Place. Future development on these lots are required to take vehicular access from Planter Place and not have curb cuts along Fallon Street unless the City determines it is in the best interest of the community to allow it, in order to maintain unbroken sidewalks and further the walkability of the neighborhood. 435 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 10 of 23 3. In order to mitigate user conflicts, a fence is required along the western property boundary to ensure park users do not encroach onto the conservation easement. The fence design must be submitted for review prior to installation, and the applicant is encouraged to coordinate with the property owner of the conservation easement to the west. 4. Due to known high groundwater, a condition shall be placed on the final plat that states, “Due to known high groundwater conditions in the area no basements will be permitted with future development of the site. No crawl spaces will be permitted with future development of the site, unless a professional engineer registered in the State of Montana certifies that the lowest point of any proposed structure is located above the seasonal high groundwater level and provide supporting groundwater data prior to the release of building permit. In addition, sump pumps are not allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Sump pumps are also not allowed to be connected to the drainage system unless capacity is designed into the drainage system to accept the pumped water. Water from sump pumps may not be discharged onto streets, such as into the curb and gutters where they may create a safety hazard for pedestrians and vehicles." 5. The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID's) on City standard record Form prior to final plat approval. SECTION 4 – CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. Sec. 38.100.080 – Compliance with regulations required. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. Sec. 38.220.070.A a. Simultaneously with filing of the final plat, in conjunction with required or offered dedications, the subdivider (or owner of the property being subdivided if the owner is not the subdivider) shall transfer ownership to the property owners’ association (POA) of any open space proposed to be conveyed to the POA and all its right, title, and interest in any improvements made to such parkland or open space. For the transfer of real property, the subdivider or owner of the property shall submit with the application for final plat a warranty deed or other instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring fee simple ownership to the POA and associated realty transfer certificate. The subdivider or owner of the property must record the deed or instrument at the time of recording of the final plat. For personal property installed upon open space owned by the property owners association, the subdivider shall provide an instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring all its rights, title and interest in such improvements including all applicable warranties to such improvements. 436 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 11 of 23 3. Sec. 38.240.150. Final plat application. a. The plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats (24.183.1107 ARM) and must be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. 4. Sec. 38.240.150.A.3.d. Transfer of ownership of public land, off-site land, personal property, improvements and water rights documents required. a. For the transfer of real property in satisfaction of required or offered dedications to the City, and required or offered donations or grants to the POA, the subdivider or owner of the property must submit with the application for final plat a warranty deed or other instrument acceptable to the city attorney transferring fee simple ownership to the City or the POA. b. For the transfer of personal property installed upon POA-owned open space, the subdivider must provide the City an instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring all its rights, title and interest in such improvements including all applicable warranties to such improvements to the City or the POA. c. The subdivider or owner of the property must record the deed or instrument transferring ownership or interest at the time of recording of the final plat with the original of such deed or instrument returned to the City or POA as applicable. d. For the transfer of ownership interest in water, the subdivider or owner of the property must submit with the application for final plat a deed or other instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring ownership to the City or POA, along with all required state department of natural resources and conservation documentation, certification and authorization. 5. Sec. 38.400.070 Street Lighting a. Subdivision lighting special improvement lighting district (SILD) information shall be submitted to the City and the district formed after preliminary plat approval in hard copy and digital form. Any final plat application will not be deemed complete until the resolution to create the SILD has been approved by the City Commission. The initial adoption of the special improvement lighting district shall include the entire area of the preliminary plat. The approval to create or annex to an existing SILD shall be granted prior to Final Plat Approval. 6. Sec. 38.410.060. - Easements. a. All Easements indicated below must be provided on city standard easements templates. Drafts must be prepared for review and approval by the city. Signed hard copies of the easements must be submitted to the City prior final plat approval. The applicant may contact the review engineer to receive standard templates. b. The applicant must provide a ten foot utility easement (power, gas, communication, etc.) along the developments property frontage. Where the lots front Open Space A and Open Space C, the easement must be provided along the rear of the lot, adjacent to Planter Place. c. The final plat must provide all necessary utility easements and they must be described, dimensioned and shown on each subdivision block of the final plat in their true and correct location. 437 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 12 of 23 7. Sec. 38.410.070.A a. As presented, wastewater generated from the subject property will flow into the existing Norton Ranch Lift Station (NRLS). The subject property was not originally allocated capacity at the lift station. The NRLS does not currently meet DEQ firm capacity requirements. A lift station design report has been completed by HDR Engineering, Inc. to allow for phased upgrades to the NRLS including the subject property. The lift station must be upgraded in accordance with the HDR design report prior to Final Plat approval. 8. Sec. 38.410.130.C.2 - Water Adequacy. a. Compliance with this section is deferred for the following developments until the occurrence of future development if the applicant records a notice of restriction on future development in a form acceptable to the review authority with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder: The applicant must contact the City Engineering Department to obtain a determination of cash-in-lieu of water rights (CILWR). CILWR must be paid prior to final plat approval. 9. Sec. 38.400.060 – Street Improvement Standards. a. The applicant stated in the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) that the Fallon Street and Cottonwood Road intersection will fall below the level of service standards defined in 38.400.060 and the intersection will require improvements. These improvements are scheduled within three years in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan and are eligible for payment of cash-in-lieu of capital facilities. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must pay the development’s proportionate share of the improvement’s costs. 10. Sec. 38.400.090 Access a. The applicant shall place the following condition of approval on this sheet prior to final plat approval. "Lot access must be constructed to the standard set forth by the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to the State Public Works Standard Specifications per Bozeman Municipal Code requirements.” b. The applicant shall place the following condition of approval on this sheet and callout the no access strip on the plat prior to final plat approval. "A 1-foot no access strip shall be placed along all lots fronting on Laurel Parkway." 11. Sec. 38.420 Parks a. A preconstruction meeting with the Parks Division and Forestry is required prior to any site work. Applicants must provide the most recent park plans and request a meeting at least 30 days prior to commencement of parkland construction. b. Well and water connection must be installed to irrigate parkland if the south development has not constructed the well yet. Any part of a City owned and maintained irrigation system that is located on private property shall be contained within a public irrigation easement. The easement shall be acceptable to the City and filed with the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder prior to final plat approval. 438 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 13 of 23 c. Prior to the City’s final acceptance of public park improvements or public street improvements, the applicant shall ensure that the City obtains ownership, free from any defects in title as determined by the City, of any irrigation water rights appurtenant to those City parks or City streets. d. If an exempt well is proposed to provide irrigation water supply for the development, a written determination from DNRC shall be provided prior to final plat approval indicating that the proposed exempt water use is allowable under applicable state law governing the use of exempt wells. e. Applicant to include this note on the final plat: “Private utilities are not allowed within parkland unless otherwise approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation.” f. Approval of the park plan amendment and construction drawings by the Parks and Recreation Director is required prior to the pre-construction meeting. Provide the following corrections with your submittal: 1. Design site amenities and trees to be outside of the 10' existing draintile maintenance easement. There is one bench within the easement that must be removed. ii. Adjust irrigation mainline material to be PVC Sch 40 material on sheet IR- 1. g. Applicant must include this note on the conditions of approval sheet of the final plat if parkland has not been fully accepted by the parks department prior to final plat review: “Although an easement or parkland dedication is required at the time of Final Plat, the Parks and Recreation Department does not assume maintenance responsibility for parkland and improvements until the following have been completed after Final Plat: 1) the constructed park meets requirements of 38.420.080 and the approved park master plan, 2) all conditions of approval for the subdivision or park master plan are completed, and 3) written acknowledgement of final acceptance has been provided by the City.” SECTION 5 – RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS The Development Review Committee (DRC) determined the application was sufficient for continued review and recommended approval with conditions on January 10, 2023. The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Planning Board, considered the application at their February 6, 2023 meeting and the motion recommending approval passed unanimously 5-0. The link to the meeting is here. The Board votes on the item at 18:30. City Commission meeting will be held Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 6:00 pm both in person and remotely using an online videoconferencing system. A remote link will be provided with the City Commission agenda. 439 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 14 of 23 SECTION 6 – STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.240.150.B, BMC. In considering applications for subdivision approval under this title, the advisory board shall consider the following: 1) Compliance with the survey requirements of Part 4 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The preliminary plat was prepared in accordance with the surveying and monumentation requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Montana. As noted in the code requirements, the final plat must comply with State statute, Administrative Rules of Montana, and the Bozeman Municipal Code. 2) Compliance with the local subdivision regulations provided for in Part 5 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The final plat must comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code. The subdivider is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions not specifically listed as a condition of approval, do not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. Sections 3 and 4 of this report identify conditions and code provisions necessary to meet all municipal standards. The listed code requirements address necessary documentation and compliance with standards. Therefore, upon satisfaction of all conditions and code corrections the subdivision will comply with the subdivision regulations. 3) Compliance with the local subdivision review procedures provided for in Part 6 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The Bozeman Community Development Board, acting in their capacity as the Planning Board, held a public meeting which was properly noticed in accordance with the Bozeman Municipal Code. Based on the recommendation of the Development Review Committee (DRC) and other applicable review agencies, the recommendation of the Planning Board, as well as any public testimony received on the matter, the City Commission will make the final decision on the subdivider’s request. The subdivider requested review of this subdivision under the terms of 76-3-623 MCA as authorized in 38.240.100. Subdivisions reviewed under the terms of 76-3-623 may not include variances or other instances of lack of compliance to standards and procedures. 440 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 15 of 23 The Department of Community Development received a preliminary plat application on March 4, 2022. The DRC reviewed the preliminary plat application and determined the submittal did not contain detailed, supporting information that was sufficient to allow for the continued review of the proposed subdivision on April 18, 2022. Revised applications were received on May 19, 2022, June 08, 2022, September 16, 2022, and December 16, 2022. The DRC determined the application was adequate for continued review on January 10, 2023 and recommended conditions of approval and code corrections for the staff report. The City scheduled public notice for this application for publication in the legal advertisements section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on Friday, February 3, 2023 for postings on Sundays, February 5 and February 12, 2023. The applicant posted public notice on the subject property on February 5, 2023. The applicant sent public notice to physically adjacent landowners via certified mail, and to all other landowners of record within 200-feet of the subject property via first class mail, on February 3, 2023. No public comment had been received on this application as of the writing of this report. On February 16, 2023 this major subdivision staff report was completed and forwarded with a recommendation of approval to the City Commission. 4) Compliance with Chapter 38, BMC and other relevant regulations Community Development staff and the DRC reviewed the preliminary plat against all applicable regulations and the application complies with the BMC and all other relevant regulations with conditions and code corrections. This report includes Conditions of Approval and required code provisions as recommended by the DRC for consideration by the City Commission to complete the application processing for final plat approval. All municipal water and sewer facilities will conform to the regulations outlined by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality and the requirements of the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. Per BMC 38.270.030, the development is not eligible for concurrent construction. 5) The provision of easements to and within the subdivision for the location and installation of any necessary utilities The final plat will provide and depict all necessary utilities and required utility easements. Code requirement No. 3, requires that all easements, existing and proposed, must be accurately depicted and addressed on the final plat and in the final plat application. Public utilities are located within dedicated street right of ways. 441 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 16 of 23 6) The provision of legal and physical access to each parcel within the subdivision and the notation of that access on the applicable plat and any instrument transferring the parcel The final plat will provide legal and physical access to each parcel within the subdivision. All of the proposed lots will have frontage on public streets or common open space constructed to City standards with lot frontage meeting minimum standards as shown on the preliminary plat. 38.220.060 Documentation of compliance with adopted standards The Development Review Committee (DRC) completed a subdivision pre-application plan review on January 04, 2022 and no variances were requested. The applicant requested and was granted waivers for floodplains, vegetation, wildlife, historical features, agriculture, and agricultural water user facilities. The applicant requested and was not approved a waiver for surface water. Staff offers the following summary comments on the documents required with Article 38.220.060, BMC. 38.220.060.A.1 – Surface water This subdivision will not significantly impact surface water. There are no existing watercourses on site. 38.220.060.A.2 - Floodplains No mapped 100-year floodplains impact the subject property. A waiver for floodplains was granted during the Pre-Application process. 38.220.060.A.3 – Groundwater Due to known high groundwater, a conditional shall be placed on the final plat that states, “Due to known high groundwater conditions in the area no basements will be permitted with future development of the site. No crawl spaces will be permitted with future development of the site, unless a professional engineer registered in the State of Montana certifies that the lowest point of any proposed structure is located above the seasonal high groundwater level and provide supporting groundwater data prior to the release of building permit. In addition, sump pumps are not allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Sump pumps are also not allowed to be connected to the drainage system unless capacity is designed into the drainage system to accept the pumped water. Water from sump pumps may not be discharged onto streets, such as into the curb and gutters where they may create a safety hazard for pedestrians and vehicles." Refer to Conditions of Approval 4. 38.220.060.A.4 - Geology, Soils and Slopes This subdivision will not significantly impact the geology, soils or slopes. No significant geological features or slopes exist on the site. 442 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 17 of 23 38.220.060.A.5 - Vegetation This subdivision will not significantly impact vegetation. No critical plant communities identified on site. A waiver for vegetation was granted during the Pre-Application process. 38.220.060.A.6 - Wildlife This subdivision will not significantly impact wildlife. A waiver for wildlife was granted during the Pre-Application process. 38.220.060.A.7 - Agriculture This subdivision will not impact agriculture. A waiver for agriculture was granted during the Pre-Application process. 38.220.060.A.8 - Agricultural Water User Facilities This subdivision will not impact agricultural water user facilities. There are no active agricultural water use facilities located within the development. The area is zoned for residential and is surrounded partially by residential development. 38.220.060.A.9 - Water and Sewer The subdivision will not significantly impact city water and sewer infrastructure. Water and sewer improvements will be designed to meet City of Bozeman Standards and State Department of Environmental Quality Standards and Regulations. Utilities will be extending existing water main and sewer mains from Fallon Street from the east, and South Eldorado Ave and South Reliance Ave from the north. As presented, wastewater generated from the subject property will flow into the existing Norton Ranch Lift Station (NRLS). The subject property was not originally allocated capacity at the lift station. The NRLS does not currently meet DEQ firm capacity requirements. A lift station design report has been completed by HDR Engineering, Inc. to allow for phased upgrades to the NRLS including the subject property. The lift station must be upgraded in accordance with the HDR design report prior to Final Plat approval. Refer to Code Requirement 7. 38.220.060.A.10 - Stormwater Management The subdivision will not significantly impact stormwater infrastructure. A stormwater management plan was provided and found in compliance with division 38.270 and the City adopted stormwater master plan. The stormwater maintenance is the responsibility of the homeowner’s association. 38.220.060.A.11 - Streets, Roads and Alleys The applicant stated in the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) that the Fallon Street and Cottonwood Road intersection will fall below the level of service standards defined in 38.400.060 and the intersection will require improvements. These improvements are scheduled within three years in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan and are eligible for payment of cash-in-lieu of capital facilities. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must pay the development’s proportionate share of the improvement’s costs. Refer to Code Requirement 9. 443 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 18 of 23 The extension of Fallon Street oriented east west will improve the overall community street grid as will the north south extension of South Eldorado Avenue and South Reliance Avenue. An alley, Planter Place, is being provided for access to the majority of the lots and will be the vehicular access for the lots. Pedestrian pathways are being provided through the subdivision with north south connections traveling north from Fallon Street and tying into the existing pedestrian pathway in the existing subdivision to the north. There is also an east west pedestrian corridor that travels from South Eldorado, across South Reliance Avenue to South Laurel Parkway. The east west pedestrian connection is the frontage for the lots oriented towards it. This proposed subdivision will include City standard sidewalks along all local streets, increasing the walkability of the area. In order to continue improving the city’s goal of walkability, all lots that have the ability to take vehicular access from the alley called Planter Place are required to use the alley as their vehicular access. Reducing the number of curb cuts along Fallon Street will improve the experience and safety for pedestrians. Refer to Condition of Approval 2b and 2c for lot orientation requirements. 38.220.060.A.12 – Non-Municipal Utilities The applicant has received confirmation of future service from Northwestern Energy and internet providers. 38.220.060.A.13 - Land Use The subdivision will not significantly impact land use. The current lot is vacant and surrounded to the north and east with residential users, to the west with a conservation easement property and to the south with a future mixed-use development. The proposed subdivision will create 31 residential lots (21 single detached family lots, 9 four-unit lots, and 1 seven-unit lot), 4 common open space lot and 1 public park. In order to ensure the minimum density requirements are being met, refer to Condition of Approval 2a for minimum densities on lots identified for multi- household development. In addition, in order to mitigate user conflicts with the conservation easement to the west, and future park users, a fence is required along the western property boundary to ensure park users do not encroach onto the conservation easement. The fence design must be submitted for review prior to installation, and the applicant is encouraged to coordinate with the property owner of the conservation easement to the west. Refer to Condition of Approval 3. 38.220.060.A.14 - Parks and Recreation Facilities The proposed subdivision will be meeting their required parkland through a combination of land dedication and improvements-in-lieu of parkland (IILP). 0.44 acres of dedicated parkland is being proposed, which leaves a shortage of 1.08 acres. The remaining 1.08 acres will be provided as improvements-in-lieu of parkland. Additionally, open space is located on site and includes pathways that tie into existing trail networks. There are several parks within a 10 minute walk from the proposed development which include: Norton Ranch, Norton East Park, and Adam Bronken Park. The proposed park will connect the existing Norton Ranch Park to a 444 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 19 of 23 proposed park directly south resulting in a continuous parkland experience and recreation trail network. Parkland dedication and IILP will be entirely provided with the subdivision development. These improvements include a recreation trail extension that ties into the existing Norton Ranch trail network; a central node comprised of a playground area, benches, and decorative boulders; additional tree plantings; and pedestrian lighting. Fencing will also be provided along the western property boundary to ensure park users do not spill onto the existing conservation easement. Refer to Conditions of Approval 3. 38.220.060.A.15 - Neighborhood Center Plan The subdivision will not be providing a neighborhood center due to the relatively small size of the development area (under 10 acres). While a neighborhood center was not required, it is anticipated the park being dedicated will act as a de facto neighborhood focal point. In addition, phase 2 of the Urban + Farm (Urban + Farm Phase 2) development to the south will be providing neighborhood centers that will likely be used by residents of this subdivision. The narrative in the concept submittal for Urban + Farm Phase 2 stated “The Neighborhood Center proposed within Urban + Farm activates public spaces with commercial opportunities and outdoor plazas. Civic buildings, trail connections and parkland are also planned to create a new destination in west Bozeman. Using higher density housing and new urbanist design emphasizing multi-modal transportation opportunities, the vision for Urban + Farm seeks to create a distinct neighborhood character and builds on existing residential and commercial development in the area.” While these neighborhood centers are not being provided with Phase 1, nor are they required due to the size of the parent parcel, it is anticipated they will be developed in the relatively near future. 38.220.060.A.16 - Lighting Plan This subdivision will not significantly impact outdoor lighting. 38.220.060.A.17 - Miscellaneous The proposed subdivision is not located within 200 feet of any public land access or within a delineated Wildland Urban Interface area. No health or safety hazards on-site or off-site will be created with this development. 38.220.060.A.19 - Affordable Housing This application does not rely on incentives authorized in 38.380. Therefore, no analysis is required. APPENDIX A – PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned R-5, Residential Mixed-Use High Density District. The intent of the R-5 residential mixed-use high density district is to provide for high-density residential development through a variety of compatible housing types and residentially supportive 445 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 20 of 23 commercial uses in a geographically compact, walkable area to serve the varying needs of the community’s residents. Adopted Growth Policy Designation: Table 4 of the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 shows the correlation between future land use map designations and implementing zoning districts. (See below for the Table) 446 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 21 of 23 The subject property is designated as Urban Neighborhood. This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. This proposed subdivision is well-suited to implement the Urban Neighborhood by providing lots that will support a variety of housing types from detached single households to seven-unit buildings. The multi-household will support the construction of “missing middle” housing which is contemplated throughout the Bozeman Community Plan 2020. The proposed subdivision is also located in a central area with relatively quick access to a variety of goods and services. The future phase, Urban + Farm Phase 2 will include commercial amenities as well, adding to the walkability of both the existing neighborhoods and this proposed subdivision. The growth policy encourages development to be walkable, which is defined in the glossary as: Walkable. A walkable area has: • A center, whether it’s a main street or a public space. • People: Enough people for businesses to flourish and for public transit to run frequently. • Parks and public space: Functional and pleasant public places to gather and play. • Pedestrian design: Buildings are close to the street, parking lots are relegated to the back. • Schools and workplaces: Close enough that walking to and from home to these destinations is realistic. • Complete streets: Streets designed for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit. With the complexity of features needed to create a walkable environment, no one site is likely to provide all the needed elements. The additional density will help provide for element two with potential for additional persons in the area. The proposed development is located adjacent to a linear park the runs north-south adjacent to El Dorado Street (the park which will be extended south with this subdivision). With the Urban + Farm Phase 2 this north-south oriented trail system will connect all the way to Huffine Lane from West Babcock St. In addition, the subject property is located approximately 0.1 mile from Norton East Park which provides passive recreation opportunities. Currently the closest commercial opportunities are approximately ½ mile away. There are currently fewer commercial opportunities for future residents to walk to at this time, however future development of Urban + Farm Phase 2 on a 86 acre parcel immediately south of Phase 1 will see additional commercial services for the residents of the proposed subdivision. 447 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 22 of 23 The proposed development is roughly 0.5 miles to a commercial node within Ferguson Farm which has a variety of retail and service options. While this commercial node does have predominately auto retail users, there are some services that residents may chose to walk to and will support a walkable neighborhood. In addition, the larger adjacent undeveloped property has a combination of REMU and B-2M zoning district which Urban + Farm Phase 2 has proposed a mix of commercial and residential users. There are a variety of park opportunities within a 10 minute walk from the proposed development which include: Norton Ranch, Norton East Park, and Adam Bronken Park. The proposed park will connect the existing Norton Ranch Park to a proposed park directly south resulting in a continuous parkland experience and recreation trail network. The Streamline Purple Line has a stop on Cottonwood Rd and Fallon St Rd. which is roughly 0.5 miles away from the proposed development. The proposed subdivision meets the following Bozeman Community Plan 2020 goals: N-1.1 Promote housing diversity, including missing middle housing N-1.10 Increase connectivity between parks and neighborhoods through continued trail and sidewalk development. Prioritize closing gaps within the network. N-1.11 Enable a gradual and predictable increase in density in developed area over time N-3.8 Promote the development of “Missing Middle” housing (townhouses, multi-household) APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Background and Description This is a preliminary plat application by the applicant, Cushing Terrell, 411 E Main Street #101, Bozeman, MT 59715, representing the property owner Laurel Parkway, LLC, PO Box 161236, Big Sky, MT 59716. APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the close of the public comment period and City Commission public hearing per BMC 38.220.420. The City scheduled public notice for this application on February 3, 2023 for publication in the legal advertisements section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on Sunday, February 5 and Sunday, February 12, 2023. The applicant posted public notice on the subject property on or by February 5, 2023. The Applicant sent public notice to physically adjacent landowners via certified mail, and to all other landowners of record within 200-feet of the subject property via first class mail, on February 3, 2023. At the time this report was written, no public comments had been received yet. To continue checking on any submitted public comments, click on this link, https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=269851&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN and toggle to the project number 22082. If no comments have been received, there may be no project folder for this application. 448 22082 Staff Report for Urban + Farm Phase 1 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 23 of 23 APPENDIX D – OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Laurel Parkway, LLC (Mike Magrans), PO Box 161236, Big Sky, MT 59716 Applicant: Cushing Terrell, 411 E Main Street #101, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representative: Cushing Terrell, 411 E Main Street #101, Bozeman, MT 59715 Report By: Lynn Hyde, Development Review Planner FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this subdivision. ATTACHMENTS Application materials – Available through the Laserfiche archive, the full file is linked below. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=260398&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN, as well as digitally at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. This project can be viewed on the Community Development Viewer interactive map directly with this link: https://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=planning&FILE_NUMBER=22-082 Public Comment: https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=259736&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN 449 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Community Development Deputy Director Anna Bentley, Community Development Director SUBJECT:Resolution 5447, The MSU Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment to Amend the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 Future Land Use Map from Public Institutions to Regional Commercial and Services on Approximately 42 Acres Located Southwest of the Intersection of College Street and S. 23rd Avenue, Application 22282 MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Resolution RECOMMENDATION:Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, Community Development Board recommendation, and all the information presented, I hereby move to adopt the findings presented in the staff report and to approve Resolution 5447, the MSU Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:This application is to amend the future land use map of the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 in support of the owner's intended development of the property. Application materials are available through the City's website. The City Commission passed a Resolution of Intent to consider this amendment on October 18, 2022 as agenda item G.10. The application was originally scheduled for consideration on December 20, 2022. At the applicant's request the item was continued to February 28, 2023. All necessary applicant steps have been completed so the item is presented for final action by the Commission. If the Commission adopts the resolution no further action will come before the Commission and the amendment will be approved. See the attached staff report for further information. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:1. Approve Resolution 5447; 2. Deny the application based on findings of non-compliance with the 450 applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 3. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: 22282 GPA Resolution of Adoption 5447.pdf 22282 Resolution 5447 Exhibit Map.pdf 22282 Innovation Campus GPA CC SR.pdf Report compiled on: February 15, 2023 451 Version April 2020 RESOLUTION 5447 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, TO ADOPT AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE BOZEMAN COMMUNITY PLAN BY THE INNOVATION CAMPUS GROWTH POLICY AMENDMENT AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM PUBLIC INSTITUIONS TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXED USE, APPLICATION 22282. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has had a comprehensive plan (growth policy) since 1958, and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman adopted its most current growth policy known as the Bozeman Community Plan (BCP) through Resolution 5133 on November 17, 2020, and WHEREAS, the Bozeman Community Plan, Section 5, establishes criteria for the amending of the document, and WHEREAS, an application has been received to amend the Future Land Use Map of the growth policy, and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2022 the Bozeman City Commission adopted Resolution No. 5446, a Resolution of Intent to modify the Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan as requested by the applicant; and WHEREAS, in accordance with 76-1-602, MCA, on January 23, 2023 the Bozeman Planning Board conducted a public hearing to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the growth policy amendment application; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman Planning Board’s motion to approve the MSU Innovation Campus GPA application No. 22282 as requested by the applicant passed 6-0; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2023 the City Commission conducted a public hearing prior to taking any action to adopt or revise a growth policy; and 452 Version April 2020 WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the City Commission passed a motion to approve modification to the Future Land Use Map as requested by the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, to wit: Section 1 In accordance with the requirements of Section 76-1-604 MCA, application No. 22282, the MSU Innovation Campus application for amendment and revision to the Bozeman Community Plan Future Land Use Map, is hereby approved. The amendment changes the designation from Public Institution to Regional Commercial and Services on 41-976 acres more or less. The property consists of one parcel of land described as: Tract C-1A, Amended Plat of West College Minor Subdivision #195, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Section 2 A public hearing was advertised and conducted on February 28, 2023 for the purpose of receiving public testimony on application 22282, MSU Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment to the Future Land Use Map. All written and oral public comment was received and considered during Commission deliberations prior to the vote to approve. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 28 day of February, 2023. ___________________________________ CYNTHIA L. ANDRUS Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 453 PROPOSED LEASE AREA4.896 ACRES S89°48'31"E 1155.52'S14°31'55"E215.29'S38°53'42"W 308.00'S4 9 ° 3 0 ' 4 5 " E 38 7 . 6 4 ' S 4 6 ° 2 7 ' 2 8 " E 60 . 0 6 ' L=30.49, R=270.00 Δ=6°28'12" L =118 .2 8 ,R =3 3 0.00Δ =2 0 °3 2 '1 2 "S0°05'19"W475.68'S89°54'05"E 1311.68' N89°49'37"E 270.57'N0°02'48"E935.95'N75°20'59" E 276.96' S89°52'33"E 29.99'N0°56'55"E259.17'VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2022COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N:\5755\007-INNOVATIONAVE\ACAD\SHEETS\GPA_EXHIBIT.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Oct/03/2022 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle MSU INNOVATION CAMPUS BOZEMAN MONTANA GROWTH POLICY MAP AMENDMENT 5755.007 ---- EX-1 CPK CPK 10/2022 1 ADDRESS CITY COMMENTS 06/15/2022CPK TECHNOLOG Y B L V D INVENT ION DR IVE W. COLLEGE ST R E S E A R C H D RTECHNOLOGY BLVD 80 16040800 SCALE IN FEET W. GARFIELD ST PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.) GROSS LOT AREA: 41.976 ACRES (1,828,475 SF) CITY OF BOZEMAN GROWTH POLICY MAP AMENDMENT PROPOSED: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES EXISTING: PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD URBAN NEIGHBORHOODCOMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXED USE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXED USE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXED USE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXED USE PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS 454 Page 1 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) Public Hearing Dates: Community Development Board December 5, 2022; continued to January 23, 2023. City Commission December 20, 2022; continued to February 28, 2023. Project Description: A growth policy amendment to revise the future land use map from Public Institutions to Regional Commercial and Services on approximately 42 acres. Project Location: The property is located between W. College Street and W. Garfield Street in approximately the 2500 block of W. College Street; and more particularly described as Minor Subdivision 195B, Lot C-1A, Section 14, Township 2 South and Range 5 East, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT. Recommendation: Meets standards for approval with contingencies Community Development Board Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby move to adopt the findings presented in the staff report and recommend approval to the City Commission of the growth policy amendment application 22282 with contingencies and subject to all applicable code provisions. City Commission Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, Community Development Board recommendation, and all the information presented, I hereby move to adopt the findings presented in the staff report and to approve Resolution 5447, the MSU Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment. Report: February 15, 2023 Staff Contact: Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Agenda Item Type: Action – Legislative EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues No unresolved issues have been identified at this time. 455 Page 2 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) Project Summary The City prepares the growth policy based on best available information at the time. As new information becomes available it is appropriate to consider possible amendments. The Innovation Campus has been in development under the auspices of the MSU Foundation and was therefore originally classified as Public Institution on the future land use map. Development oversight and ownership of the Innovation Campus has now transferred to a private entity and the scope of the intended development has shifted. A master site plan for the area has been reviewed and approved. The owners believe that a change in future land use designation; and a possible zoning change, may be beneficial and enable development more consistent with the goals of the growth policy and their goals. An application for an amendment to the future land use map of the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 has been submitted by the landowner. Discussion and criteria for deciding on this growth policy application are limited to those in this report. Other elements of the future development will be addressed separately in the future. Application materials are available through the City’s website. No public comment has been received as of the writing of this report. Community Development Board Summary The Community Development Board in their capacity as the Planning Board continued the public hearing on December 5, 2022 to January 23, 2023. No discussion or comment occurred on December 5th. The public hearing was held on January 23, 2023. The video of the hearing is available with the growth policy amendment beginning at 4:43:45. No public comment was received. The Board recommended approval of the amendment on a vote of 6-0. Alternatives 1. Approve Resolution 5447; 2. Deny the application based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 3. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 456 Page 3 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................. 1 Project Summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Community Development Board Summary .................................................................... 2 Alternatives ........................................................................................................................ 2 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES........................................................................................................ 4 SECTION 2 - CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL ...................................................................... 5 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS ............................................... 5 SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS .................................................................... 6 APPENDIX A - PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY ......................................... 12 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ............................................................ 15 APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF .................................... 15 457 Page 4 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES Map 1: Location Map Map 2: View of existing area Future Land Use Map designations, Bozeman Community Plan 2020 Subject Property 458 Page 5 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) Map 3 - Application Exhibit SECTION 2 - CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL The applicant has provided the required information for the requested amendment to be adopted. Therefore, there are no contingencies. The Resolution has been prepared and the City Commission will act on the Resolution at their public hearing. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS Having considered the criteria established for a growth policy map amendment, the Staff recommends approval with contingencies for the application as submitted. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the amendment on September 14, 2022 and finds no limitations on approval. The Community Development Board in their capacity as the Planning Board will hold a public hearing on January 23, 2023, to make a recommendation to the City Commission for the 459 Page 6 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) growth policy map amendment. After consideration of all materials and matters they recommended approval or disapproval of the amendment. The hearing begins at 6:00 p.m. Meetings will be held in the location and manner identified on the meeting agenda. The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the growth policy map amendment on February 28, 2023. The hearing begins at 6:00 p.m. Meetings will be held in the location and manner identified on the meeting agenda. SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. In considering applications for approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission must consider the following criteria. As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. See the application materials for the applicant’s response to criteria and arguments in favor of approval. To reach a favorable decision on the proposed application the City Commission must find that the application meets all of criteria 1-4 of Chapter 5| Plan Amendments, Review Triggers Amendments, and Amendment Criteria, page 67, Bozeman Community Plan 2020. In making these findings, they may identify that there are some negative elements within the specific criteria with the final balance being a positive outcome for approval. When an amendment to either the text of the Plan or the future land use map is requested it must be reviewed against the following criteria: 1. The proposed amendment must cure a deficiency in the growth policy or improve the growth policy to better respond to the needs of the general community; 2. The proposed amendment does not create inconsistencies within the growth policy, either between the goals and the maps or between different goals and objectives; 3. The proposed amendment must be consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy; and 4. The proposed amendment may must not adversely affect the community as a whole or any significant portion thereof by: a. Significantly altering land use patterns and principles in a manner contrary to those established by this Plan, b. Requiring unmitigated improvements to streets, water, sewer, or other public facilities or services, thereby impacting development of other lands, 460 Page 7 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) c. Adversely impacting existing uses because of inadequately mitigated impacts on facilities or services, or d. Negatively affecting the health and safety of the residents. 1. The proposed amendment must cure a deficiency in the growth policy or improve the growth policy to better respond to the needs of the general community; Criterion met. This criterion contains two alternate parts. A favorable finding for either part supports a positive finding. Staff first reviewed the proposal for its ability to cure a deficiency. The property was annexed to the city sometime between 1963 and 1969. According to the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 (adopted in 2020) the property is designated as Public Institutions. The property has been affiliated with MSU for many years. During the public review and adoption process for the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 no indication of this designation being incorrect was brought the City’s attention and the existing future land use designation was carried forward and adopted with the new plan. As noted below, the Public Institutions designation is for publicly owned property. It has since become known that MSU no longer owns the property and it is held by a non-public owner and has been for some time. Therefore, staff concludes there is a deficiency of a designation of property as a public institution which is not actually public property. In terms of whether the current proposal better responds to the needs of the general community and/or improves the growth policy, one primary question arises: Would the new designation and associated land uses better respond to the needs of the general community and/or improve the growth policy? The applicant states the proposed modification to the FLUM responds to community needs by altering the designation to from Public Institutions to Regional Commercial and Services. The only zoning designation used to implement the Public Institutions FLUM designation is the Public Lands and Institutions (PLI) district. The descriptions of the existing and requested future land use map designations follow. 9. PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS. The land in this classification is owned by a public entity. A variety of activities are undertaken in this land use classification. Schools are a dominant use including 461 Page 8 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) Montana State University. Other typical uses are libraries, fire stations, and publicly operated utilities. A significant portion of Bozeman’s employment occurs within this category. 5. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES. Regionally significant developments in this land use category may be developed with physically large and economically prominent facilities requiring substantial infrastructure and location near significant transportation facilities. Due to the scale of these developments, location, and transition between lower density uses is important. Residential space should be located above the first floor to maintain land availability for necessary services. Development within this category needs well-integrated utilities, transportation, and open space networks that encourage pedestrian activity and provide ready-access within and adjacent to development. Large community scale areas in this land use category are generally 75 acres or larger and are activity centers for several surrounding square miles. These are intended to service the overall community as well as adjacent neighborhoods and are typically distributed by a one-to two-mile separation. Chapter 1 | Basics, Basic Planning Precepts discusses the principals the City used to prepare the policies, goals, objectives, land use designations, and future land use map in this Plan. See page 20. The majority of these precepts relate to this and all map amendments. Four of them stand out in relation to this application. These are overarching above any one or several specific goals or actions. • Variety in housing and employment opportunities are essential. • Land use designations must respond to a broad range of factors, including infrastructure, natural, and economic constraints, other community priorities, and expectations of all affected parties concerning private development. • Infill development and redevelopment should be prioritized, but incremental compact outward growth is a necessary part of the City’s growth. • The City intends to create a healthy, safe, resilient, and sustainable community by incorporating a holistic approach to the design, construction, and operation of buildings, neighborhoods, and the City as a whole. Developments should contribute to these goals and be integrated into their neighborhood and the larger community. The intended use of the Innovation Campus is technology transfer from MSU to commercial development and other supportive commercial research. The intended uses better fit the description of the Regional Commercial and Services than the Public Institutions designation. The property is currently zoned as Business Park which is not an implementing zoning for the Public Institutions designation. The proposed FLUM 462 Page 9 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) change furthers a variety of Community Plan goals and objectives when analyzed through the lens of responding to the needs of the general community. Goal EE-1: Promote the continued development of Bozeman as an innovative and thriving economic center. EE-1.1 Support the goals and objectives outlined in the Bozeman Economic Development Strategy. Rationale: The Bozeman Community Plan 2020 is primarily focused on land uses. The City adopts a variety of other plans pursuing other subjects, such as economic development, in greater detail than is appropriate in the growth policy. See page 19 of the BCP2020 for a listing of other plans and their connection to the growth policy. A new Economic Development Strategy was adopted on January 10, 2023 by the City Commission.. The proposed amendment is expected to be supportive to development of the Innovation Campus located at the project site. The Innovation Campus is a lead or partner on implementation actions. This aligns with Goal 2 – Support a Diverse Economy, Objective Focus on traded sector industries that are emerging and can increase exports. Theme 1 of the growth policy reads: “Our City desires to be forward thinking, collaborative, and deliberate in planning and execution of plans and policies to enable our community to successfully ride the waves of change.” The ability to adapt to changing circumstances is enhanced by a robust and diverse economy. Both the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 and the upcoming Economic Vitality Strategy address resilience in goals and implementation steps. BCP 2020 Goal R-1: Continue to strengthen and develop resilience as a community. EVS GOAL 3: BUILD A MORE RESILIENT REGION The MSU Innovation Campus is a lead or partner party on implementation steps for economic vitality. The MSU-IC has requested the growth policy amendment as they believe the scope of allowed uses and intent for the Regional Commercial and Services is more descriptive and supportive of the direction the MSU IC is taking. See the different land use descriptions above. Chapter 3 | Future Land Use described the intent and the implementing zoning districts each land use designation. There is only one implementing district for the Public Institutions future land use designation which is PLI. The PLI district uses are focused on 463 Page 10 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) public ownership and operations. The MSU-IC is transitioning to a more private market development configuration. The proposed amendment advances goals and objectives of the Bozeman Community Plan including, but not limited to, those cited above. See also the application materials for identification of goals and objectives and response to this criterion. 2. The proposed amendment does not create inconsistencies within the growth policy, either between the goals and the maps or between different goals and objectives. Criterion met. Staff reviewed the growth policy goals and objective and future land use map. The proposed amendment does not create any identified inconsistencies within the growth policy goals or between goals and maps. See discussion for Criterion 1. Further, the property is no longer owned by a public entity and therefore, the description of Public Institution is no longer a good fit. All future development must demonstrate compliance with all regulatory standards addressing transportation, parks, building design, and all other standards. The standards have been crafted and adopted to implement the goals and objectives of the growth policy. Therefore, compliance with the standards will ensure this criterion is met. Properties to the west and east are designated as commercial areas. The largest adjacent area to the west is designated as Regional Commercial and Services. The purpose of the Innovation Campus as updated is a larger scale with greater emphasis on regional and national companies as well as smaller start-up firms. Employment and services provided are expected to occur at a regional or larger scale. Staff did not identify conflicts between map elements or goals and objectives from the proposed amendment. 3. The proposed amendment must be consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy. The overall intent of the growth policy is to proactively and creatively address issues of development and change while protecting public health, safety and welfare (page 20). If approved, the proposed amendment to the future land use map will allow the site to be considered for future applications that, if approved, would allow development or further development of the site. 464 Page 11 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) The growth policy discusses the primary issue of “Does the City Have to Grow” and the subsequent equation, if so how, see pages 12 – 15 Bozeman Community Plan 2020. This discussion illustrates, in part, why this application is consistent with the overall intent of the plan. Specific goals and objectives found in Chapter 2 further this statement. The City supports development within its boundaries where municipal services can be effectively and efficiently provided. The property has been annexed for several decades. The BCP2020 in several themes encourages infill and densification of area already served with utilities. Utilities and transportation are available and being extended into the site. The change will facilitate placement of substantial employment near a variety of services and housing opportunities and adjacent to existing arterial and collector streets with accompanying shared use paths and bicycle lanes. This will facilitate the use of non-motorized transportation as encouraged under Theme 6. 4. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the community as a whole or significant portion thereof by: a) Significantly altering land use patterns and principles in a manner contrary to those established by this Plan, Criterion Met. The proposed map amendment does not significantly alter land use patterns from those established by the plan. The existing land use designation is Public Lands and the proposed land use designation is Regional Commercial and Services. Both are primarily non-residential areas and allow for intensive development. The property immediately to the west is already designated as Regional Commercial and Services. The property immediately to the east is Community Commercial and Services. To the north across College Street is a mix of homes and businesses. To the south is MSU property zoned as PLI and used for agricultural research. The basic pattern of services and homes will remain unchanged with this amendment. Although there is a change in designation, Staff finds the change will not significantly alter the land use pattern contrary to the Bozeman Community Plan. As discussed in Criterion 1, the amendment advances goals and principles of the growth policy and therefore is not contrary to the growth policy. b) Requiring unmitigated improvements to streets, water, sewer, or other public facilities or services, thereby impacting development of other lands, 465 Page 12 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) No negative impacts to other lands or the community are anticipated as a result of the proposed growth policy amendment. The site is located within the service boundary for municipal infrastructure and all city services are constructed and directly adjacent to the subject property. The property has an approved Master Site Plan which lays out the essential transportation, water, sewer, and communication utilities within the site. The change in future land use designation does not alter the essential layout of services. The property is adjacent to arterial and collector streets. No unusual impacts on infrastructure are expected. c) Adversely impact existing uses because of inadequately mitigated impacts on facilities and services, No adverse impacts have been identified at this time. Additional review will occur during site development and mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts will be addressed at that time, as required by municipal code. As noted above, there is an approved Master Site Plan in place which analyzed facility and service demand for proposed development. This approach enables mitigation to be proportionate to the proposed development as required by law. d) Negatively affecting the health and safety of the residents. There are no existing residents within the boundary of the growth policy amendment. Therefore there can be no negative impacts to health or safety. The employees of businesses located in the area now and in the future will be protected by established standards of development. Necessary sewer, water, emergency services, transportation, etc. will be evaluated and required to be provided with development. All such services are currently provided to the site. There are residents in proximity to the area of the growth policy amendment. They are primarily located north of College Street. The right of way for College Street provides a physical separation from development in the MSU-IC. There are no identified impacts from future development which will be unmitigated that will jeopardize health and safety. APPENDIX A - PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The property is inside Bozeman city limits and is zoned as Business Park. A master site plan has been approved for the site and is being constructed to provide transportation and 466 Page 13 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) utilities. Individual site plans for specific buildings will be reviewed over time and must be consistent with the approved Master Site Plan. The existing Business Park zoning designation is inconsistent with the Public Institution designation. It is also inconsistent with the Regional Commercial and Services designation. The amendment does not fully cure the current inconsistency; however, considering the two different FLUM designations and the implementing zoning districts, the Business Park zoning is more consistent with districts and uses to implement the Regional Commercial and Services. See the image on the following page. Adopted Growth Policy Designations: The following designations are applicable to this application. Existing Designation: PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS. The land in this classification is owned by a public entity. A variety of activities are undertaken in this land use classification. Schools are a dominant use including Montana State University. Other typical uses are libraries, fire stations, and publicly operated utilities. A significant portion of Bozeman’s employment occurs within this category. Proposed Designation: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES. Regionally significant developments in this land use category may be developed with physically large and economically prominent facilities requiring substantial infrastructure and location near significant transportation facilities. Due to the scale of these developments, location, and transition between lower density uses is important. Residential space should be located above the first floor to maintain land availability for necessary services. Development within this category needs well-integrated utilities, transportation, and open space networks that encourage pedestrian activity and provide ready-access within and adjacent to development. Large community scale areas in this land use category are generally 75 acres or larger and are activity centers for several surrounding square miles. These are intended to service the overall community as well as adjacent neighborhoods and are typically distributed by a one-to two-mile separation. 467 Page 14 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) Zoning Correlation with Land Use Categories 468 Page 15 of 15 22282, Staff Report for the Innovation Campus Growth Policy Amendment (GPA) APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was sent via US first class mail to the owners of the subject property and all owners of property located within 200 feet of the perimeter of the site. The project site was posted with a copy of the notice along College Street and Garfield Street. The notice was published in the Legal Ads section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on November 20, 2022, November 27, 2022, and December 11, 2022. The Planning Board public hearing was scheduled and advertised for Monday, December 5, 2022. At that meeting the public hearing was continued to January 23, 2023. No public comment was received at the hearing on January 23rd. The City Commission was scheduled and advertised to conduct a public hearing on the application on Tuesday, December 20, 2022. At that meeting the public hearing was continued to February 28, 2023. No written public comments have been received regarding this project at this time. APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: MSU Innovation Campus, 222 E. Main Street, Bozeman MT 59715 Applicant: AE Design, 515 W Aspen Street, Suite 200A, Bozeman, MT 59715 Report By: Chris Saunders AICP, Community Development Manager FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this growth policy amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Application materials are available through the City’s website. 469 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Community Development Deputy Director Anna Bentley, Community Development Director SUBJECT:UDC Project - Review and Advise Regarding the Update to the Unified Development Code, Chapter 38, Bozeman Municipal Code to Address Potential Changes to Standards Relating to Numbers of Parking Spaces, Application 21381 MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Policy Discussion RECOMMENDATION:Receive presentation, discuss proposed alternatives, and provide direction to staff and consultants. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:On December 21, 2021, the City Commission adopted Resolution 5368. The resolution established priorities for municipal actions over the next two years. Priorities include adopting changes to the Unified Development Code to “facilitate increased housing density, housing affordability, climate action plan objectives, sustainable building practices, and a transparent, predictable and understandable development review process.” This agenda item is part of the UDC update process and is a work session regarding how higher and lower density developments can successfully be adjacent. Discussion will also include possible changes to or deletions of commercial and mixed-use zoning district. A memo providing background material is attached. Consultants will present information to the City Commission and receive direction and input. The input will then be used to prepare draft materials for further public review and input. Ongoing information about the UDC project can be found on at the engage.bozeman.net/udc website, the official portal for the project. Comments and input can also be submitted through engage.bozeman.net and summaries of prior City Commission and other meetings are provided, including presentation materials. The City Commission conducted a work session on February 14, 2023 to discuss building transitions and commercial and mixed use zoning districts. 470 One member was absent and the Commission indicated that discussion could be continued to the Feb 28th meeting to allow all members to participate in discussions. The video of the Feb 14th meeting is available. Discussion begins at approximately 3 hours 33 minutes in the recording. Feb 14th packet materials are also available. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:Commission will give direction on degree to pursue specific issues relating to parking amendments and potentially on building transitions. ALTERNATIVES:As identified by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:Funds for this work are budgeted and appropriated. Attachments: 2-28-2023 Work Session cover memo.pdf Report compiled on: February 21, 2023 471 City Commission Parking Revisions Work Session Background Materials Overall Project Background: On December 21, 2021, the City Commission adopted Resolution 5368. The resolution established priorities for the next two years. Priorities include adopting changes to the Unified Development Code to “facilitate increased housing density, housing affordability, climate action plan objectives, sustainable building practices, and a transparent, predictable and understandable development review process.” The UDC revision process (“the UDC Project”) focuses on implementing policy established by adopted plans including Bozeman Community Plan 2020, Climate Action Plan, Community Housing Action Plan, and the in-progress Parks, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan. Several major amendments are completed in 2022. The UDC project is focused on specific improvements, with direction to be completed by December 2023. Objectives for the UDC revision project are: • Implementation of growth policy, climate action plan, housing action plan, and other adopted city plans. • Improving readability and usability of the code for infrequent users while maintaining legal soundness. • Updates and revisions to zoning district descriptions and options consistent with the growth policy. • Improve graphics to improve clarity and understanding of standards. Work Session General Policy Background: Parking is not a purpose for its own sake. It supports other necessary activities as part of the transportation network. The introduction to the parking development standards says in part: “Parking is one part of the overall multimodal transportation system. Individual choice of travel mode and development characteristics influence the need for parking” (Section 38.540.010). Land use standards contain distinct elements related to parking including design, operations, and number of parking spaces for different uses. The focus of this work session is the number of non-residential parking spaces to be provided. Access to goods, services, housing, recreation, and other activities is essential for a functional community. Bozeman’s original settlement relied upon foot and horse travel. Later, trains and trolleys, bicycles, buses, and personal motor vehicles took a place as part of the travel package as well. As the City expanded physically and economically a reliance on motor vehicles for travel also expanded. Each vehicle trip begins and ends with parking. Bozeman works hard to develop pedestrian and bicycle access and other multi-modal options. All new development is required to provide sidewalks. The City has adopted a complete streets policy. The policy ensures that new road construction and road retrofits include pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The City’s trail network is an important feature of the community. As shown on the following map, there are facilities throughout the City. A high priority in the growth policy is to close gaps and complete networks so the system can be as effective as possible. The City has 472 provided funding through the CIP for needed work and new development also contributes. On- going maintenance is necessary for these facilities to work year round. As wide spread as they are, these facilities are not sufficient to meet all travel needs. Bozeman is a major tourism destination and an economic hub for a multi-county area. Although not all rely on motor vehicles, Montana has more registered motor vehicles than it has people. The following image is US Census travel data using the On The Map service. It displays the most recently available data from 2019. Recent changes in employment may alter the patterns some but are expected to remain largely as presented. The arrows represent different origins for travel to work trips: Dark green - commuters coming into town, Medium green – traveling from home to work with both ends in Bozeman, Light green – commuters leaving Bozeman for work. 473 Bozeman first adopted parking standards in 1959. Bozeman has long worked to “right size” its parking requirements and correlate them to Bozeman’s circumstances. The City conducted numerous parking studies on different uses and locations across the community. That data has informed parking requirements and numbers of parking spaces have been adjusted. The number of parking spaces required with new development has trended down. The City created a variety of incentives for development to support alternate means of travel to reduce demand for parking. A variety of options were created to meet parking requirements while producing less parking. These include authorization for parking shared between different users on and off- site, reductions in required parking near transit, and reductions if suitable bicycle commuting facilities were provided. In the “right size” process the City knew that either excess or inadequate parking results in problems for citizens, visitors, and businesses. While working to “right size” Bozeman followed several principles. 1) Parking is not a purpose to itself, it is to support other activities and must be in balance with other functional needs of a site. 2) Development should not cause spillover impacts to others and be functional to its purpose and site. 3) Excess regulation or requirements are to be avoided and removed if identified. 4) Parking demand is evaluated as average use, not maximum day demand. 474 5) In the absence of a larger coordinating approach each development needed to meet its own needs. Where more coordinated options are available, individual site provided parking may be less. 6) There are multiple options to provide access; which may include a requirement to provide functional parking spaces. 7) Once development is approved the City cannot retroactively change standards or impose new requirements. 8) Parking is not required to be free. Landowners are explicitly authorized to charge for parking. Growth Policy: The City adopted a new growth policy, the Bozeman Community Plan 2020, in November 2020. State law requires zoning ordinances to be "in accord" with the growth policy. To be “in accord” does not require strict compliance. The courts have recognized that policy can be understood and applied in a variety of ways and must be balanced across many issues. The Bozeman Community Plan 2020 includes direction to amend development regulations. The City recently updated plans for climate action and housing. Development regulations play a role in implementing those plans as well. The updated plans establish the policy direction for code text amendments. The UDC project allows the City to take action on adopted policy. This work is not intended to create new policy or change the policy direction already established. As noted above, parking (specifically numbers of parking spaces) is only one element of the transportation system. Discussion on additional transportation system elements is scheduled for discussion on March 21, 2023. Other land use policies such as discouragement of large areas of single use development and encouragement of mixed uses can lessen demand for overall motor vehicle travel. For example, research on mixed use areas similar to Bozeman’s downtown area showed a reduction of 29% in the number of motor vehicle trips; which influences the need for parking. Methods of parking provision and management other than zoning influence to what degree parking needs to be considered with zoning regulations. The Bozeman Community Plan 2020 contains goals and policies regarding transportation systems. Example of Bozeman Community Plan 2020 policy direction influencing this work session on parking include: R-1.7 Be flexible: willingness and ability to adopt alternative strategies in response to changing circumstances. DCD-1.2 Remove regulatory barriers to infill. DCD-3.5 Encourage increased development intensity in commercial centers and near major employers. 475 DCD-3.6 Evaluate parking requirements and methods of providing parking as part of the overall transportation system for and between districts. M-1.1 Prioritize mixed-use land use patterns. Encourage and enable the development of housing, jobs, and services in close proximity to one another. M-1.12 Eliminate parking minimum requirements in commercial districts and affordable housing areas and reduce parking minimums elsewhere, acknowledging that demand for parking will still result in new supply being built. The City adopted the Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan in 2019. It has recommendations regarding parking, including suggested specific code amendments. If there is a conflict between the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 and the Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan the former controls. The Climate Action Plan addresses parking in the context of impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and other climate related issues. As shown in these excerpts from the Climate Action Plan it takes a holistic approach to the issue addressing policy and practice in the public and private realms. “Provide options and incentives for employee telecommuting and alternatives to single occupancy vehicle travel (e.g., bike to work days, preferred parking spots, carpool matching, bicycle racks, wellness programs, etc.) (Actions 4.J.2. and 4.J.5.)” Executive Summary, p. xii. 4.J.3. Improve Maintenance of Multi-Modal Infrastructure “Removing barriers to active modes of transportation can enable community members to engage in more cost-effective means of travel. For example, improving access to public transit for low-income community members can reduce the transportation burden for those forced to live further from goods and services due to the cost of housing. Similarly, this solution expands mobility and accessibility for the portion of the community population that cannot drive due to physical abilities, age, and/or income. Alternatively, some community members may maintain a need for car ownership and travel. Penalizing car trips through disincentives (i.e., restricting parking or increasing the cost of parking) may disproportionately impact residents who rely on car travel.” p. 102 Enabling legislation: The City’s zoning is authorized by Title 76, Chapter 2, Part 3 of the Montana Code Annotated. Section 76-2-304 establishes required criteria that any local zoning ordinance must address. Paragraph 1 criteria below is compulsory and paragraph 2 must be considered. Elements specific to parking include: Criteria and guidelines for zoning regulations. (1) Zoning regulations must be: (b) designed to: 476 (iii) facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements. (2) In the adoption of zoning regulations, the municipal governing body shall consider: (b) the effect on motorized and nonmotorized transportation systems; Work Session Topics: The Code Studio team proposes three questions for Commission consideration. There is some practical overlap between the questions. This is due to the complexity of parking; and the mix of approaches already in place in Bozeman. Based on the Commission’s direction, recommendations will be further developed prior to incorporation as part of the overall code update draft. The residential parking requirements in Table 38.540.050-1 were materially reduced in fall 2022 in Section 15 of Ordinance 2105. The design standards and operational requirements will be reviewed as part of the UDC update. Those elements are not the subject of this work session. Q1 Are you ready to expand the no required parking standard to other areas of the City? Q2 At this time, are you comfortable implementing the Downtown Plan’s parking ratio recommendations? Q3 For portions of the City with parking requirements, are OK simplifying down the existing ratios into broader categories and eliminating many of the reductions? Background Information on Topics: Question 1. The City has put in place a variety of parking approaches for different areas of the community. A key element of distinguishing one area from another has been what alternatives exist to individual on-site provision of parking. For example, the City applied a two part parking standard in the B-2M district. Parts of the Midtown area are both zoned B-2M and are within an urban renewal district. One possible action for an urban renewal district would be to construct shared parking (surface or structured) to encourage and facilitate development within the district. Therefore, properties that are both within the B-2M district and the Midtown urban renewal district are not required to provide on-site parking spaces. The ability to coordinate a shared method of addressing adequate parking through the urban renewal district lessens the need for each project to be independent with provided parking (either on-site or off-site). Locations zoned as B-2M but not in the urban renewal district are required to provide on-site parking and have a much simplified parking requirements table. See Table 38.540.505-6. There are other locations in the Bozeman which have the potential for similar provision of commonly managed parking facilities. The City could create a similar two part approach outside of Midtown. If the Commission is not comfortable setting requirements to zero then consideration could be given to a simplified or reduced requirement. The code could be structured so that if common parking management options, parking management districts such as next to MSU or parking 477 benefit districts, are created elsewhere in the future adjustments to required parking could be automatically available. Question 2. The City adopted the Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan in 2019. Appendix B, pages 10-11, makes two recommendations for parking revisions specific to the downtown area. Portions of the recommendations are addressed with the changes to residential parking requirements last fall. Recommendations for the non-residential parking include a single parking requirement that is uniformly applicable across all uses. This is a more consolidated approach than used elsewhere in the community. A subset of downtown, representing the area generally developed prior to widespread use of automobiles, is suggested to be exempted from parking. There are publicly managed parking assets in the area which help distinguish the downtown from other areas of the community. This question shares elements of the other two questions for this work session. Question 3. The non-residential parking requirements address a wide range of uses. Different uses have different characteristics that most closely describe parking needs. The existing parking Table 38.540.050-3 reflects this complexity. Although more accurate to individual uses, sites change use over time. Although the City allows 10% flexibility in parking requirements for redevelopment, the details of parking space provision add complexity to reuse and redevelopment. The City has adopted several options to voluntarily reduce required parking to reflect location in the community, zoning, and other factors. The details are in 38.540.050. These make provision of parking more flexible but also add complexity. The City took a modified approach in the B-2M district. A more consolidated and simplified parking table (38.540.050-6) is less precise for individual uses but provides a simpler calculation. With the simpler table other reductions for parking used elsewhere are not available in B-2M. Not all uses are addressed in the B-2M parking table but it provides an example of how the generally applicable parking requirements could be consolidated and simplified. With the simpler standards the various alternatives could be deleted. Work Session Schedule: The magnitude of the anticipated changes necessitates periodic input from the Commission and public to ensure the project remains on course and timely. A series of focused work sessions are proposed at critical junctures in the process to gather information and confirm project direction. Each work session will focus on one element of policy implementation. The sequence of subjects will correlate and coordinate with ongoing work, with the added goal of identifying key elements early in the process and working efficiently. City Commission work sessions are below. Tuesday, September 13th – Organization and Page Layout (completed) Tuesday, October 18th – Residential Zoning Districts (completed) Tuesday, November 15th – Sustainability (completed) 478 Tuesday, February 14th – Transitions between districts and Commercial Zoning Districts (completed) Tuesday, February 28th – Parking Tuesday, March 21st – Transportation Ongoing summaries of work sessions and other public engagement and information about the project is available at engage.bozeman.net/UDC. Public Engagement: The City uses a variety of techniques to engage the public during the code update process. A detailed report on the intercept technique was provided with the February 14, 2023, City Commission work session packet. A summary of various meetings and other engagement so far was also attached. Outreach and engagement will continue as the project moves forward. The primary outreach tool, consistent with the adopted communication plan for this work, is engage.bozeman.net/UDC. 479 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Nicholas Ross, Director of Transportation and Engineering SUBJECT:Kagy Revisited Work Session MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Policy Discussion RECOMMENDATION:Provide policy guidance regarding the Kagy Boulevard project. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for existing and new infrastructure. BACKGROUND:Kagy Boulevard Reconstruction, identified as project SIF009 in the FY24-28 Capital Improvement Plan, is a critical Federal Aid Urban project to improve Kagy Boulevard between S 19th Ave and Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave. The project's goals include upgrading existing roadway deficiencies and connecting multimodal facilities throughout the corridor. In addition, the project team has been tasked with planning for future growth on a 20-year horizon. Speaking to the sensitive nature of the decision, Staff has tasked the Design Team with reevaluating traffic analysis in an effort to ensure we're providing the most prudent recommendation to Commission. This Work Session will update Commission on progress of that reevaluation and seek policy guidance on most-appropriate level of service, facility quality, and public engagement. Staff intends to return in late spring with a follow-up work session in which a final recommendation on scope of design will be presented to Commission for approval. A Staff Memo is attached with additional information on progress since spring of 2021. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None identified. ALTERNATIVES:None identified. FISCAL EFFECTS:The Kagy Boulevard project is in the current Capital Improvement Program. It is funded primarily with Federal Aid Urban funds combined with City Impact Fees funds. Attachments: KagyRevisitedMemo.pdf 480 Kagy Draft Traffic Report.pdf Report compiled on: February 17, 2023 481 Staff Report Kagy Revisited Work Session Bozeman City Commission February 28, 2023 Kagy Boulevard Reconstruction, identified as project SIF009 in the FY24-28 Capital Improvement Plan, is a critical Federal Aid Urban project to improve Kagy Boulevard between S 19th Ave and Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave. The project's goals include upgrading existing roadway deficiencies and connecting multimodal facilities throughout the corridor. In addition, the project team has been tasked with planning for future growth on a 20-year horizon. Speaking to the sensitive nature of the decision, Staff has tasked the Design Team with reevaluating traffic analysis in an effort to ensure the most prudent recommendation to Commission. The purpose of this memo and Work Session is to update Commission on progress of that reevaluation and seek policy guidance on appropriate level of service, facility quality, and public engagement. Staff intends to return in late spring with a follow-up work session in which a final recommendation on scope of design will be presented to Commission for approval. Purpose and Need Purpose and Need are required environmental documentation for transportation projects. These statements help define the ultimate scope of a project as the outcomes of the project must serve the Purpose and Need. For the Kagy Boulevard Reconstruction, the purpose has been defined to provide a safe and efficient facility for all users. The need for the project is defined to address current deficiencies and accommodate future demands for all modes of travel within the 20-year horizon. The 1.1 mile project corridor roughly breaks down into two distinct sections. From its western limits at the intersection of S 19th to the intersection of S 11th, the existing Kagy corridor is built to a 2-lane rural county road standard. This section contains an incomplete sidewalk network with gaps between built sections, complete lack of on or off-road bicycle facilities, failing pavement condition, missing street lights, and lack of curb and gutter for stormwater management. This section will experience significant development pressure in the upcoming years, as will be discussed later in this memo, and requires reconstruction in order to 482 avoid stranding these developments with only auto access to Montana State University and beyond. From the intersection of S 11th to the project’s eastern limits at Willson Ave, the corridor has been previously rebuilt to a 3-lane standard with a full center turn lane until 7th and grass median with left-turn pockets from 7th to Willson. This section contains narrow sidewalks, striped bicycle lanes that are inadequate for the volume and speed of adjacent vehicles, failing pavement condition, missing street lights, and both signalized and un-signalized intersections that could be improved to provide additional safety as demand increases. As will be discussed in future sections of this memo, the existing capacity of the corridor is also inadequate to maintain current level of service with anticipated future demand. Current Scope of Work The Kagy Boulevard project has evolved significantly since it began in 2015. The project was initially scoped for a 3-lane section with full pedestrian and bicycle facilities, one grade- separated crossing, and signalized intersections. Planning quickly evolved through evaluation of traffic, environmental impact, right of way, and utilities. Four stakeholder meetings and one open house were held along the way for public input culminating in a City Commission meeting in December 2016. At that time, cost estimates were developed and it became clear the project could not be funded. The project stalled until 2020 when it was relaunched. An updated traffic study and evaluation undertaken at that time indicated that traffic demand on the corridor was projected to increase significantly more than previously anticipated. This increase is likely due to developing adjacent land in south Bozeman to higher zoned density than originally anticipated under the 2015 project. This reevaluation concluded with an updated scope recommending a 4-lane section with full bicycle and pedestrian facilities, two grade-separated crossings, and roundabouts at 11th, 7th, and Willson. The updated scope was approved by Bozeman City Commission on 3/2/2021 and subsequently by the Transportation Commission on 8/26/2021. Project Funding and Cost Estimate The Kagy Boulevard Reconstruction is anticipated to be funded through three sources. Primary funding will be through Federal Surface Transportation Program (STPU) at a maximum amount of $18,670,853. STPU funds must be used on an Urban Highway Route, as defined by the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT). MDT allows only one STPU project to be undertaken a time, but projects on other Urban Routes may proceed with other sources of 483 funding. This would allow, for example, the City to advance design on a project like College Ave in parallel with Kagy. The second funding source for Kagy Reconstruction is Bozeman Street Impact Fees at a maximum amount of $6,500,000. $1,000,000 of this funding has already been encumbered through the design phase of the project and could not be recouped if the project does not advance. Street Impact Fees must fund capacity expansion of the roadway system and cannot be used for maintenance or multimodal improvements alone. Finally, Staff intends to seek significant grant funding through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. The Kagy project aligns well under two discretionary grant programs, Multimodal Project Discretionary Grant (MPDG Rural) and Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE). These programs have funded projects of significance across other Montana cities, and Bozeman has positioned itself well to capitalize on these opportunities in upcoming funding cycles. If successful, this grant could not only fill a funding gap that remains in the project but also allow us to re-allocate STPU and SIF funds to other projects of need in the city. The most recent cost estimate for the project was developed in the summer of 2022, as shown below: Capital cost of construction for the current scope was estimated at approximately $16,000,000 with an additional $5,000,000 in design, construction oversight, and right of way. Due to unprecedented cost escalation, this anticipated cost has increased 20% between 2020 and 2021 and an additional 24% between 2021 and 2022. The combined effect of project delays and cost inflation mean that the final cost is now projected to be approximately $27,000,000 by the date the contract would be bid. This leaves a funding gap of up to $3m, depending on date and future inflation. Fortunately, early bids for 2023 work indicate a significant decrease in rate of escalation. This estimate also contains a 20% contingency that will be reduced as design advances. It should be noted that these cost increases are not a function of the Kagy project itself but of all work of this type across the city. The additional cost of widening Kagy from a 3-lane facility to a 4- lane facility is estimated to be a maximum of $2,500,000 or just 10% of total project cost. 484 Preliminary Traffic Evaluation At the request of the city, the project’s lead design consultant Sanderson Stewart prepared an updated Preliminary Traffic Report for MDT. The goal of this reevaluation was to update existing baseline traffic conditions, project future demand state-of-practice assumptions for walkable urban environments, and evaluate capacity of various corridor options of single-lane, multi-lane, signalization, and roundabout intersection control. The full Activity 112 Report can be viewed upon release by MDT. Existing Traffic Volumes Traffic counts were collected in spring of 2022 and compared to the original data collected in 2015. As shown in the table, Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes decreased on all Kagy approaches to each intersection (identified as “East” and “West” in the table) except for west of 19th. This can be explained by two causes. First, traffic growth is projected to come primarily from intensification of land use. When land is annexed into the city, zoning is applied, and use intensifies with housing or commercial development the demand for transportation trips increases. This demand is expressed as trips in terms of volume. Between 2015 and 2022, relatively little housing and commercial development has come online south of Huffine Lane. Population growth has predominantly been in the west and northwest regions of Bozeman during and prior to that time. Without an intensification in land use driving demand for additional trips, relatively little growth in traffic would be the expected outcome we now see. 485 Additionally, several new roadway connections in the south part of town have influenced choice of route. In 2017, Graf Street was connected from S 19th to S 3rd and became an alternate route to Kagy which has drawn volume away from the Kagy corridor. S 11th was connected between Opportunity Way and Graf in 2019 to support several student housing developments, which in turn increased volume on 11th from 1500 ADT to 7600 ADT between 2015 and 2022. It should be noted that little to no impact can now be found from pandemic-related chances in travel. Future Traffic Demand Future traffic projection has historically been found to be a significant source of risk due to large potential for error. Error in traffic projection can lead to roadways that are either under or over capacity. Significant attention has been given to this component of planning on the Kagy project with the explicit goal of ensuring future volumes are not over-projected in a manner that causes the corridor to be overbuilt. Systemic sources of error in traffic projection have been identified primarily through two manners. First, certain traffic projections in the past have used an assumed annual growth factor to project future demand at a later date. This assumes continually growth in per capita vehicle miles travelled such that traffic would be assumed to grow independent of changes in land use. However, per capita vehicle miles traveled has effectively plateaued since approximately 2004 which has left these types of projections at risk of significant overestimation. This can be observed in the lack of overall traffic growth on Kagy between 2015-2022; little development occurred to intensify land use and increase trip demand, and little traffic volume growth was found as a result. Staff has directed the design team explicitly not to use annual growth rates to project traffic demand on Kagy, instead focuses solely on changes in land use from new development. Second, projected trip demand from changes in land use is estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual. This guide applies an assumed number of trips generated based on specific types of land use. These estimates have been found to produce error in certain urban contexts. The estimates tended to be derived from small sample studies of solely suburban context such that they failed to identify the probability of internal trip capture in mixed-used developments and any walk/bike/transit mode share. Staff has directed the design team to rectify this issue by projecting up to 50% of trips from new development be either internally captured or use alternate modes when directly adjacent to Kagy and 10% for new developments within a 1 mile radius of the project. 486 Additionally, Staff has directed the design team to assume future roadway connections identified in Bozeman’s 2017 Transportation Master Plan will be complete in the design year as a means of optimizing alternate routes to Kagy. Those future connections are as follows: · Stucky Road – Fowler to 19th · West Arnold Street – 19th to 11th · Fowler Lane – Stucky to West Garfield If these roadways are not funded and built, volumes on Kagy would be expected to increase due to a lack of alternate routes in the south part of the city. Currently only Stucky Rd is planned to be funded in the FY24-28 CIP. With these revised assumptions, the design team has completed future traffic projections for a design year of 2045. This evaluation identified 32 known development opportunities that would be expected to drive demand for trips on Kagy. These developments, if fully built, project to generate 9,935 new homes and more than a million square feet of office and retail space. That growth would represent approximately 36% of Bozeman’s total population on a 20-year horizon. This growth results in projected volumes of between 21,300 ADT at the west end of the project and 27,300 ADT at the east end. As a point of comparison, these future volumes are comparable to current volumes on N 19th and Huffine Lane. Capacity Analysis Intersection capacity was then evaluated for the existing and future conditions. Capacity of an intersection is measured by a metric known as Level of Service. This expresses the capacity of an intersection in terms of average delay expected to be experienced by each vehicle. Varying levels of service and their respective delay values can be found below: 487 Policy guidance on Level of Service currently available to staff comes in the form of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). BMC Sec. 38.400.060 – Street Improvement Standards states “All arterial and collector street and intersections must operate at a minimum level of service “C”…”. LOS C is a relatively high standard of minimizing delay for cities and town of Bozeman’s current and future size. This policy standard is which drives the requirement to build larger streets and intersections, which can be seen as detrimental to Bozeman’s safety and multimodal comfort goal. Analysis was performed on both single (2 or 3 lanes) and multilane (4 or 5 lanes) models with the assumption that left turn lanes would be provided where necessary. Resulting anticipated average delay at each intersection can be found below: 488 The results indicate the all intersections except for 7th fail to meet an LOS C in either scenario. This implies that a reduction in expected level of service must be allowed in order to avoid building an even larger 6-lane roadway. Operational differences between single and multi-lane options are most severe at 11th and Willson, with the single-lane option inducing between 50 and 100 additional seconds of delay for the average vehicle. Congestion of this magnitude would be larger than most if not all intersections currently operating in Bozeman. Comparable delays may be currently seen at the intersections of Durston and 7th and Durston and 19th. As witness at those locations, delay of this magnitude can induce traffic diversions onto adjacent local streets and aggressive behavior in failing to yield for pedestrians and obey traffic control. Induced Demand As part of the planning process, staff have evaluated the potential for this project to induce additional demand for transportation trips. The concept of induced demand asserts that when a good or service is underpriced, more demand for that good or service is induced than would otherwise be expected. This is applied in transportation planning by evaluating the impact of providing additional roadway capacity on future traffic growth and operations. The typical process for inducing demand through capacity addition follows that when a highway is severely congested people tend to take other modes, other routes, and travel at other times of day. When they highway is expanded, those people choice to take the now less-congested route. Highway expansion may also induce additional development along the corridor due to the new access the highway provides. Those additional trips were not accounted for in the initial traffic projection, and the newly-expanded highway reaches its capacity far sooner than anticipated while benefits of lessening congestion are lost. While staff does not dispute the existence of induced demand, care should be taken to ensure it is applied correctly. Studies of induced demand have almost exclusively been done in major metropolitan areas and on large interstate-level highways. There is inconclusive evidence on how this applies to roadways of smaller scale and cities of much smaller size such as Kagy and Bozeman. For example, induced demand would imply that even improving signal timing of an intersection in order for it to operate more efficiently would induce more driving in the area. Strong evidence has yet to be found that this occurs in practice, implying that induced demand operates depending on scale of city and roadway. For induced demand to factor into the Kagy discussion, one must believe that the manners of inducing demand identified above are present. There does not appear to be evidence of significant numbers of people choosing alternate modes or routes along Kagy, and decisions to annex and intensify land use have been already made regardless of roadway expansion. Based 489 on these factors, it is unlikely for an expansion of Kagy to induce demand in the manner found elsewhere on highway facilities in large cities. However, research into induced demand does provide guidance on alternatives to road building as a means of managing transportation demand. The following strategies have been found, in combination, to be effective at significantly reducing traffic volumes to a scale that would be needed to maintain reasonable level of service on Kagy without expansion to multi-lane facility: · Fast, frequent, and reliable transit service o Transit is the backbone of all good walkable and bicycle-friendly cities. It provides service in adverse weather conditions, across distances that may not be reasonable for active transportation, and for classes of people who are unable to walk and bike. Service must be comparable or faster than driving, which means very frequent (15 minute) headways, dense routes, and dedicated right of way. All of these components come at substantial capital and operating cost that would require voter support in the future. · High-quality bike/ped infrastructure o Comfortable and convenient bike/ped infrastructure can provide additional modal choice to those who are able and willing as an alternative to driving. · Pricing disincentive to drive such as Congestion Pricing or paid parking o Traffic congestion tends to maintain equilibrium, meaning that if auto trips are diverted to transit or walking/biking they will be filled by additional auto trips. o In order to avoid inducing demand for auto trips, the cost for those auto trips must increase until it becomes a disincentive to driving. Notably, research indicates that building transit and/or bike/ped facilities alone is unlikely to solve congested roadways without the pricing component. Alternative Analysis Robust walking and biking infrastructure in the form of wide shared use paths, grade separation, and intersection control have been directed by staff to be included regardless of option as the foundational components of any reconstruction plan. Alternative options for corridor reconstruction therefor generally align with the expected level of service to be provided. Existing Level of Service If guidance were given to prioritize a reduction in future delay by holding existing level of service (“C” or better), then a large 6-lane option with 3-lane roundabouts and additional widening on intersecting roadways would be required. Staff does not believe this type of facility meets the intent of Commission or our public, and for that reason the option has not advanced further. 490 Reasonable Delay If guidance were given to accept what could be considered a “reasonable” amount of delay (LOS D), then capacity analysis indicates that the multi-lane option would be preferred. This option would have no more than two through-lanes in either direction, with left turn lanes provided where necessary. This option would include a landscaped median to provide traffic calming effects and pedestrian refuge when crossing at intersections. No pedestrian would be exposed to more than two lanes of traffic at a time. Walkers and cyclists would be served by separated and protected infrastructure, and roundabouts would be installed at the intersections of 11th and 7th. Bozeman unfortunately lacks quality examples of this type of a facility, and it is possible that public backlash seen in prior engagement sessions may be based on our history of how multi- lane roadways such as 7th, 19th, and portions of Oak feel and function. To that end, staff have investigated international best practices for multi-lane roadways. By being intentional about design choices and adequately separating uses, multi-lane facilities can provide adequate mobility for significant numbers of vehicles without degrading accessibility and safety of bicyclists and pedestrians. An example of one from what some consider the bicycle capital of the world, Utrecht, Netherlands is provided below: SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH Significant Delay If guidance were given to accept what could be considered a “significant” amount of delay (LOS F), then capacity analysis indicates that the single-lane option would be preferred. This option would have no more than one through-lane in either direction with left turn lanes provided where necessary. Walkers and cyclists would be served by separated and protected infrastructure, and roundabouts would be installed at the intersections of 11th and 7th. As similar type of street is under design for the Fowler Avenue Connection and would be comparable to S 8th in the downtown area of Bozeman. This option would have adequate capacity for up to approximately 18,000 vehicles per day, which represents roughly half of the additional demand projected by development intensity around the Kagy corridor. While this option is unlikely to serve the projected demand on the corridor at full build out, it may be possible to construct as an interim solution to a future multi-lane corridor. This option 491 would be design to reduce the amount of reconstruction for future widening, should a future Commission choose. The risks involve being unable to react quickly enough for growth that has oversaturated the roadway, thus inducing aggressive driving behavior in the form of cut-through traffic on local residential streets, lack of yielding to pedestrians, and disobedience of traffic control. Transportation Equity The city of Bozeman’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives are being actively integrated into design and operation of transportation infrastructure. As part of the Kagy Revisited effort, Transportation and Engineering staff have engaged with our Belonging in Bozeman team to identify process for evaluating transportation equity for all projects. This evaluation will be standard procedure moving forward at both planning and design phases of projects to advise better decisions in design and implementation. Our transportation equity evaluation takes the form of three questions: · Who benefits? · Who is burdened? · What may be the unintended consequences? While staff intends to seek discussion from the public and commission on these questions prior to completing our evaluation and recommendation, a divide appears to exist between single- lane option that benefits accessibility of those closest to the corridor and multi-lane option that benefits mobility of those further away. While design can mitigate the burden of a multi-lane corridor on accessibility, only significant investments in transit that are out of the hands of staff and commission can mitigate a reduction in mobility for those further away in the single-lane option. As housing prices in Bozeman have skyrocketed, lower-income workers have increasingly been pushed further out to the extents of the city and adjacent towns such as Belgrade. This implies an unintended consequence of a well-intentioned plan to limit the size of Kagy may induce further hardship for those who cannot afford to live in walking and biking distance. Next Steps Staff will inform commission of advancements in project planning over the past year, answer any questions, and seek commission guidance during this upcoming work session. The design team will then engage the public over the next 1-2 months, after which staff intends to provide commission with recommended final scope of work in a second work session late-spring to early- summer. 492 Preliminary Traffic Report STPU 1212(7) Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Prepared for: Prepared by: Submittal Date: February 13, 2023 Sanderson Stewart Project No. 15060.01 493 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page i Table Of Contents 2.0 INTRODUCTION 1 3.0 BACKGROUND 1 4.0 STUDY LOCATION AND LIMITS 2 Roadway Characteristics 2 Pedestrian Facilities 3 5.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (2015/2022) 4 Vehicular Traffic Volumes 4 Pedestrian Traffic Volumes 6 Capacity Calculations 8 Existing Conditions (2022) Traffic Signal Warrants 10 6.0 CRASH HISTORY ANALYSIS 11 7.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 13 Project Area Planned Developments & Traffic Volume Projection Methodology 13 Pedestrian Volume Projections 14 Design Year (2045) Traffic Signal Warrants 17 Corridor Capacity 17 Intersection Capacity 18 8.0 PROPOSED DESIGN FEATURES 26 Roadway Design Speed 26 Access Control 26 Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 27 Intersection Traffic Control 27 Planned Future Street Network Improvements 28 9.0 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 28 Selection Criteria 28 Corridor Alternative Comparison 30 Intersection Alternative Comparison 31 10.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 Summary of Analysis 36 Recommendations 37 494 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page ii APPENDICES APPENDIX A – TRAFFIC COUNT DATA AND MEMO APPENDIX B – EXISTING CONDITIONS (2022) CAPACITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C – SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D – VOLUME PROJECTIONS MEMO APPENDIX E – DESIGN YEAR (2045) CAPACITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX F – INTERIM YEAR (2035) CAPACITY CALCULATIONS LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Existing Conditions (2022) Capacity Calculation Summary 10 Table 2. Crash Data Summary 11 Table 3. Crash Summary Tables 12 Table 4. Corridor V/C Ratio Comparison 18 Table 5. South 19th Avenue Design Year (2045) Capacity Results 19 Table 6. South 19th Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results 19 Table 7. South 11th Avenue Design Year (2045) Capacity Results 21 Table 8. South 11th Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results 22 Table 9. South 7th Avenue Design Year (2045) Capacity Results 23 Table 10. South 7th Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results 24 Table 11. South Willson Avenue Design Year (2045) Capacity Results 25 Table 12. South Willson Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results 26 Table 13. Corridor Decision Matrix 34 Table 14. Intersection Decision Matrix 35 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Study Area and Corridor Limits 2 Figure 2. Existing (2022) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7 Figure 3. 2015, 2022, & 2045 Peak Hour Bike/Ped Volumes 9 Figure 4. Design Year (2045) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 Figure 5. Interim Year (2035) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 495 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report and its attachments is to fulfill the requirements of Activity 112: Preliminary Traffic Report for STPU 1212(7) – Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson – UPN 8931000. The primary objectives of the reconstruction project are to widen Kagy Boulevard and implement intersection traffic control improvements to improve vehicular and pedestrian capacity and safety for the corridor. This report presents traffic-related project information, including existing conditions (2015/2022), interim year (2035), and design year (2045), background information, and traffic analysis results. Recommendations are provided herein relative to general roadway geometrics, traffic control, safety improvements, and other design elements based on a 35-mph design speed and Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) Design Standards, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and other design resources including those from the City of Bozeman. 2.0 BACKGROUND Kagy Boulevard is an urban principal arterial in the Bozeman street system and an important commuter route. It also bisects the south portion of the Montana State University campus and provides access to Bobcat Stadium, Brick Breeden Fieldhouse, campus parking lots, and the Museum of the Rockies, as well as various other businesses and institutional facilities. A new fire station located north of Kagy Boulevard between South 7th Avenue and Greek Way will be constructed in 2023. Kagy Boulevard intersects with several major collector and minor arterial north-south streets, each of which are also heavily utilized daily by commuters and/or students and that become quite congested before and after Bobcat home football games. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic is heavy along Kagy Boulevard and at the intersecting streets, particularly during Bobcat football games, but also on a more regular basis due to its proximity to campus. Pedestrian and bicycle activity along and crossing the corridor will continue to increase as more development occurs to the south of Kagy Boulevard. The segment of Kagy Boulevard from South 19th Avenue to South Willson Avenue has effectively outgrown its two and three-lane typical section capacity and does not provide continuous, dedicated bicycle or pedestrian facilities in its current state. This project is planned to incorporate a complete street design, evaluate widening with more lanes, implement intersection traffic control improvements where warranted, improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities both on- and off-street, provide two grade-separated pedestrian crossings of Kagy Boulevard with future consideration for additional grade-separated crossings, and upgrade street lighting, landscaping, and drainage facilities. Only the east leg of the South 19th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection will be modified through this project, but further 496 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 2 modifications were evaluated to determine if any improvements may need to be considered through an additional project. 3.0 STUDY LOCATION AND LIMITS The STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson project begins at reference post (RP) 0.00 (South 19th Avenue) and extends east to RP 1.05 (Willson Avenue). Figure 1 below illustrates the corridor study area limits. Roadway Characteristics Kagy Boulevard (U-1212) begins approximately 475 feet west of South 22nd Avenue and extends generally east to the edge of the Bozeman urban limits. From there, the street continues east as Bozeman Trail Road (U-1212). The U-1212 designation terminates at Fort Ellis Road, but Bozeman Trail Road continues generally east to its terminus at the Bear Canyon Interstate 90 interchange. The typical section for Kagy Boulevard consists of two 12-foot driving lanes and shoulders that vary in width from two to six feet. The City of Bozeman 497 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 3 completed the Kagy Boulevard Interim Improvements Project from approximately 500 feet west of South 11th Avenue to approximately 500 feet east of South 7th Avenue in 2017 to expand Kagy Boulevard to a three-lane typical section with a two-way left-turn lane, bike lanes, and boulevard-separated sidewalks. West of South 19th Avenue, there is curb, gutter, and boulevard-separated sidewalk along the north edge of the street and a paved shoulder without sidewalk on the south edge. From South 19th Avenue to South 11th Avenue, there is no curb and gutter on either side of the street and intermittent sidewalk near South 11th Avenue. From South 11th Avenue to South Willson Avenue, there is curb and gutter, variable width grass boulevard, and sidewalk on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit on Kagy Boulevard is 35 mph throughout the study area. The intersections of Kagy Boulevard with South 19th Avenue, South 11th Avenue, and South Willson Avenue are controlled with traffic signals. There are auxiliary turn lanes at the signalized intersections, as well as at the two-way stop-controlled intersections at South 7th Avenue and Greek Way. The South Willson Avenue (South 3rd Avenue) intersection has slip lanes for eastbound and westbound right-turn movements onto South 3rd Avenue and South Willson Avenue, respectively. That intersection also has a skew angle of approximately 60 degrees. Per the Bozeman Transportation Master Plan (2017), Kagy Boulevard and South 19th Avenue are principal arterials. South 11th Avenue is a collector, as is South 7th Avenue north of Kagy Boulevard. South of Kagy Boulevard, South 7th Avenue is a local Street. South Willson Avenue is a minor arterial north of Kagy Boulevard and a collector to the south (where it becomes South 3rd Avenue). The Montana Department of Transportation classifies Kagy Boulevard, South 19th Avenue, South 11th Avenue (north of Kagy Boulevard), and South Willson Avenue (north of Kagy Boulevard) as minor arterials. South 7th Avenue north of Kagy Boulevard and South 3rd Avenue south of Kagy Boulevard are classified as major collectors. The remaining study area streets are classified as local streets. The terrain along Kagy Boulevard is generally flat within the study area boundary and the horizontal alignment is straight. Sight distance is generally very good throughout the study area, though trees may obstruct the clear vision triangle for some private approaches. Existing private utilities along the corridor include telephone, overhead and underground power, landscape irrigation, natural gas, and fiber optics. Public water, sewer, intermittent street lighting, and storm drainage facilities also exist within the project corridor. Pedestrian Facilities There are no existing pedestrian facilities on either side of Kagy Boulevard from South 19th Avenue to the west boundary of Stadium Center Subdivision (1000 feet west of South 11th 498 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 4 Avenue), where a 5-foot sidewalk begins on the south side of the street and extends approximately 670 feet east along the subdivision frontage. Approximately 13 feet of boulevard separates the sidewalk from the uncurbed shoulder of Kagy Boulevard in that area. On the north side of Kagy Boulevard, a 5-foot sidewalk separated by a variable-width boulevard begins at Stadium Drive (west) and connects to the South 11th Avenue intersection. East of South 11th Avenue, there is continuous 5-foot sidewalk on both sides of the street throughout the remainder of the project. The north-side sidewalk has an 8-foot boulevard separating the walkway from the curbed road surface. The alignment of the south-side sidewalk varies throughout the remainder of the project corridor with offsets from back of curb ranging from five feet to approximately 35 feet. There are signalized crosswalks on all approaches at the South 19th Avenue, South 11th Avenue, and South Willson Avenue intersections. There is also a pedestrian hybrid beacon (HAWK) controlled mid-block crosswalk on the west side of the Bobcat Stadium driveway and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) crosswalk on the east side of the South 7th Avenue intersection. Kagy Boulevard is typically closed between South 11th Avenue and South 7th Avenue 4-5 hours before all home Bobcat football games to accommodate high pedestrian traffic. The road remains closed through and for 1-2 hours after each football game to allow pedestrian traffic in the area to dissipate. At the conclusion of each game, uniformed Bozeman police officers usually direct traffic at intersections along Kagy Boulevard near the football stadium and use traffic control devices to modify traffic patterns. 4.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (2015/2022) Vehicular Traffic Volumes AM and PM peak hour intersection counts were originally performed for the twelve project intersections listed below in the spring of 2015. The actual 2015 count dates and days are listed for each intersection. · Kagy Boulevard/South 19th Avenue – Thursday, April 9 · Kagy Boulevard/Hawk Ridge Apartments driveway – Thursday, April 2 · Kagy Boulevard/Willow Way – Thursday, April 9 · Kagy Boulevard/Stadium Drive (west) – Thursday, April 16 (AM)/ Tuesday, April 7 (PM) · Kagy Boulevard/Stadium Drive (east) – Tuesday, April 7 · Kagy Boulevard/South 11th Avenue – Tuesday, April 7 · Kagy Boulevard/Bobcat Stadium driveway (east) – Tuesday, April 7 · Kagy Boulevard/South 7th Avenue – Thursday, April 2 499 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 5 · Kagy Boulevard/Greek Way – Thursday, April 2 · Kagy Boulevard/South 3rd Avenue (west) – Tuesday, March 31 · Kagy Boulevard/South Willson Avenue/South 3rd Avenue (east) – Tuesday, March 31 · Kagy Boulevard/Southwood commercial building driveway – Thursday, April 2 Later in 2015, the City of Bozeman expressed concerns about traffic operations at the Kagy Boulevard/South 11th Avenue intersection and requested that this project evaluate peak hour queuing problems. As a result, Sanderson Stewart counted that intersection again on Wednesday, September 23, 2015. A comparison of the seasonally adjusted September counts to the April counts showed that the September counts were 24.0% and 18.5% higher for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. This raised some concerns as there wasn’t an obvious explanation for the variation between the two counts. After discussing the issue at length with MDT, it was decided to recount the four main corridor intersections (South 19th Avenue, South 11th Avenue, South 7th Avenue, and South Willson Avenue/South 3rd Avenue) to investigate if there were additional variations in existing peak hour and average daily traffic volumes. The additional counts were performed on Thursday, October 15, 2015. The AM and PM peak hour counts from October, adjusted for seasonal variation, varied from the April counts as follows: · +0.5% for South 19th Avenue · +0.7% for South 11th Avenue · -7.3% for South 7th Avenue · -19.8% for South Willson Avenue These levels of variation were cumulatively deemed to be within reason, even with the substantial variation for the South Willson Avenue intersection count, and the September count at the South 11th Avenue intersection was deemed an outlier. Shortly thereafter, the project was put on-hold (until 2022) pending funding and maintenance resolutions. Once the project was reinitiated, additional turning movement counts were collected for 48-hour periods from Tuesday, April 26 through Wednesday, April 27, 2022, in the following locations to use as a basis for updating existing conditions data and calculating future traffic projections: · Kagy Boulevard/South 19th Avenue · Kagy Boulevard/South 11th Avenue · Kagy Boulevard/South 7th Avenue · Kagy Boulevard/South Willson Avenue/South 3rd Avenue 500 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 6 Sanderson Stewart applied the most current available MDT seasonal adjustment factors to the 2022 counts to calculate peak hour turning movement and average annual daily traffic volumes (AADTs) for use in this analysis. The AM and PM peak hours were determined to be 7:45-8:45 AM and 5:00-6:00 PM. Figure 2 on the following page illustrates the AM and PM Existing Conditions (2022) turning movement volumes and the AADT volumes for the project corridor. An AADT volume is also shown for Graf Street east of South 19th Avenue, which was calculated based on data collected on Tuesday, April 5, 2022 in support of another area project. Data for special events outside of typical peak hours was not collected. An existing traffic volumes memo comparing 2015 and 2022 traffic volumes was completed and submitted to the City of Bozeman and MDT for review on July 25, 2022. That memo, along with 2015 and 2022 traffic count data is attached in Appendix A. The comparison in the memo revealed that there have been fluctuating volumes along the corridor since 2015 with a general trend of increased traffic west of South 7th Avenue and decreased volumes east of South 7th Avenue based on MDT data. The Sanderson Stewart daily volumes showed a similar trend, with higher total entering volume (TEV) at the intersections of Kagy Boulevard with South 19th Avenue and South 11th Avenue and lower TEV at South 7th Avenue and South Willson Avenue. However, most of the increase in TEV occurred on the minor approaches to Kagy Boulevard. Pedestrian Traffic Volumes Pedestrian traffic crossing Kagy Boulevard is a key focus area for this project, including during Bobcat home football games, where Kagy Boulevard is heavily utilized. Currently, Kagy Boulevard is closed from South 11th Avenue to South 7th Avenue during football games. However, one task of the Kagy Boulevard reconstruction project is to evaluate the merits of installing two or more grade-separated pedestrian crossings, which would greatly enhance pedestrian safety and could also allow Kagy Boulevard to remain open during special events at Bobcat Stadium. To gauge the pedestrian crossing peak demand, Sanderson Stewart observed video footage of pedestrians crossing Kagy Boulevard before a homecoming weekend Bobcat football game on Saturday, September 26, 2015. Pedestrian flows were also counted at four study area intersections (South 19th Avenue, South 11th Avenue, South 7th Avenue, South Willson Avenue) as part of the traffic data collection effort in October 2015 to gauge typical daily pedestrian demand. The spring 2022 traffic counts also collected pedestrian traffic data at the same four intersections. 501 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson; UPN 8931000, Page 7 P:15060_Preliminary Traffic Report (2/13/2023) 502 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 8 Game day pedestrian observations were additionally made for eight separate crossing corridors between South 11th Avenue and a location immediately east of the east Bobcat Stadium driveway as part of the 2015 counts. The peak, one-hour period for pedestrian crossings occurred from 10:45-11:45 AM (1:35 PM game start time). During that hour, approximately 6800 people crossed Kagy Boulevard within a 1500-foot stretch of the street. The busiest 15- minute period saw 1977 people cross the street. Overall, during the two-hour period from 10:30 AM-12:30 PM, approximately 10,700 people crossed Kagy Boulevard within the observation corridor. The busiest crossing locations were just east of the South 11th Avenue intersection where there is a winding sidewalk that cuts the intersection corner between the Montana State University monument sign and the parking lot for Brick Breeden Fieldhouse, and east of the east Bobcat Stadium driveway, which aligns with the driveway for the Brick Breeden Fieldhouse south parking lot. The latter location is also where the Spirit of the West Marching Band and the football team cross the street before and after the games (those individuals are included in the counts). For the 2022 weekday AM and PM traffic peak periods, only the South 11th Avenue and Kagy Boulevard intersection realized a bicycle and pedestrian crossing demand of more than a few individuals. For the purposes of the pedestrian volume discussion, bicycle volumes are included in the pedestrian totals. For the South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection, 76 and 85 pedestrians were observed to cross Kagy Boulevard during the AM and PM traffic peak hours, respectively. The peak volume crossing Kagy Boulevard at South 11th Avenue during the two day data collection period was 120 pedestrians from 2:45-3:45 PM on April 26, 2022. The crosswalk on the east leg was the more commonly used (compared to the west leg), with 79 pedestrians crossing at the westbound approach. Very few (14) pedestrians crossed South 11th Avenue on either the north or south approach. At the South 7th Avenue intersection, 31 and 40 pedestrians were counted crossing Kagy Boulevard during the AM and PM traffic peak hours, respectively. A peak pedestrian volume of 48 across Kagy Boulevard at that intersection was recorded on April 27, 2022 from 8:30-9:30 AM. A pedestrian hybrid beacon was installed at the east Bobcat Circle access at the beginning of the 2022 fall semester. Pedestrian volumes at that location were not counted as part of this analysis. Figure 3 on the following page shows the 2015 and 2022 pedestrian and bicycle volumes during the vehicle peak hours. Capacity Calculations Capacity calculations for existing conditions were performed for the study area intersections using Synchro, Version 11, which is based on the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2016) methodologies. Level of service (LOS) is defined as a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, and convenience. LOS is a qualitative measure of the performance of an intersection with values ranging from LOS A, indicating good operation and low vehicle delays, to LOS F, which indicates congestion and longer vehicle delays. 503 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson, UPN 8931000, Page 9 P:15060_Preliminary Traffic Report (2/13/2023) 504 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 10 Table 1 below provides a summary of Existing Conditions (2022) weekday AM and PM peak hour capacity results. The results of the capacity calculations show that the east and west legs of the South 19th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection currently operate at LOS D during the AM peak hour, and the northbound approach at the Kagy Boulevard/South 7th Avenue intersection also operates at LOS D in the AM peak hour. All intersections and approaches currently operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour. Projected 95th percentile queuing can be lengthy along Kagy Boulevard at the signalized intersections during peak traffic periods. Detailed capacity worksheets for the Existing Conditions (2022) scenario are provided in Appendix B. Existing Conditions (2022) Traffic Signal Warrants Traffic signal warrants were evaluated for the intersection of Kagy Boulevard and South 7th Avenue since it is an existing unsignalized intersection of two major routes and the intersection was shown to operate with substandard LOS metrics in the AM peak hour for the Existing Conditions (2022) scenario. The analysis results showed that a traffic signal is considered Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 41.7 D 4 31.1 C 4 WB 39.1 D 7 31.9 C 12 NB 13.1 B 8 22.7 C 7 SB 8.2 A 6 14.1 B 8 Intersection 17.6 B --22.6 C -- EB 20.7 C 21 17.4 B 18 WB 15.8 B 14 22.5 C 21 NB 20.6 C 10 22.7 C 7 SB 16.7 B 4 22.0 C 8 Intersection 19.0 B --20.9 C -- EB 2.8 A 1 0.9 A 1 WB 0.4 A 1 0.1 A 0 NB 33.6 D 1 21.6 C 1 SB 20.8 C 1 17.9 C 2 Intersection 3.1 A --4.2 A -- EB 18.7 B 10 19.0 B 16 WB 20.2 C 13 17.7 B 12 NB 20.7 C 10 22.5 C 6 SB 18.3 B 6 22.7 C 9 Intersection 19.7 B --20.0 C -- Kagy Boulevard & South Willson Avenue Intersection Control Signalized Kagy Boulevard & South 11th Avenue Intersection Control Two-Way Stop-Control (NB/SB) Intersection Control Signalized South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard & South 7th Avenue Intersection Control Signalized Intersection Approach Existing (2022) AM Peak PM Peak Table 1: Existing Conditions (2022) Capacity Calculation Summary 505 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 11 warranted, with the Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume and Roadway Network warrants both currently met. Detailed traffic signal warrant worksheets are presented in Appendix C. 5.0 CRASH HISTORY ANALYSIS Historical crash data was originally obtained from MDT for the 4-year period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2014. An updated analysis was not performed in 2022 because MDT is not able to obtain crash data from the City of Bozeman beyond 2018, and it is thought that any additional data from 2015-2018 would not be particularly more representative of current crash conditions and patterns than the prior summarized data. Seventy-eight (78) crashes were reported during the reporting period, an average of 19.5 crashes/year for the project corridor. The crash rates for key segments of the project corridor were calculated based on current AADT volumes as measured in 2015. For these types of studies, intersections with a crash rate greater than 1.0 crashes per million entering vehicles (MVE) are typically analyzed further to determine if an inherent safety concern exists. For this study, none of the four major corridor intersections exhibited crash rates higher than 0.51 crashes/MVE. Table 2 below summarizes the crash rates, severity indexes, and severity rates for the four major intersections. Of the 78 total crashes, 16 were classified as a “possible injury accident” (resulting in 25 total injuries), five were classified as “non-incapacitating evident injury crashes” (resulting in 5 total injuries), and the remaining 57 crashes were classified as “property-damage-only” crashes. There were no fatal crashes. Crash detail statistics are provided in Table 3 on the following page. The severity indexes range from 1.00 to 1.93, while the severity rates range from 0.35 to 0.87. MDT does not keep a record of typical or average crash or severity rates for urban intersections that are part of their highway system. However, the severity indexes and rates for these intersections are generally low, which is not surprising when you consider that no fatalities or incapacitating injuries were reported amongst the 78 crashes during the four-year analysis period. Table 2. Kagy Boulevard Major Intersection Crash/Severity Rate Summary Intersection Crash Rate Severity Index Severity Rate Kagy Boulevard & South 19th Avenue 0.44 1.93 0.85 Kagy Boulevard & South 11th Avenue 0.35 1.00 0.35 Kagy Boulevard & South 7th Avenue 0.50 1.17 0.58 Kagy Boulevard & Willson Avenue/South 3rd Avenue 0.51 1.71 0.87 Table 2: Kagy Boulevard Major Intersection Crash/Severity Rate Summary 506 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 12 Year Crashes % Weather Crashes % Collision Type Crashes % 2011 19 24.4% Clear 38 48.7% Head On 1 1.3% 2012 32 41.0% Cloudy 25 32.1% Rear End 48 61.5% 2013 18 23.1% Snow 4 5.1% Right Angle 6 7.7% 2014 9 11.5% Rain 6 7.7% Sideswipe SD 4 5.1% Totals 78 100.0% Blowing Snow 4 5.1% Sideswipe OD 1 1.3% Unknown 1 1.3% Rollover 1 1.3% Totals 78 100.0% Left Turn SD 2 2.6% Month Crashes %Left Turn OD 6 7.7% January 5 6.4%Right Turn OD 1 1.3% February 5 6.4%Road Conditions Crashes %Not Fixed Object 1 1.3% March 7 9.0% Dry 50 64.1% Fix Object 3 3.8% April 3 3.8% Wet 11 14.1% Bicycle 2 2.6% May 4 5.1% Snow 3 3.8% Other 2 2.6% June 9 11.5% Ice/Frost 13 16.7% Totals 78 100.0% July 7 9.0% Unkown 1 1.3% August 6 7.7% Totals 78 100.0% September 10 12.8%Vehicle Type Vehicles % October 5 6.4%Motorcycle 1 0.6% November 11 14.1%Light Conditions Crashes %Passenger Car 77 46.1% December 6 7.7% Dawn 1 1.3% SUV 42 25.1% Totals 78 100.0% Daylight 56 71.8% Van 4 2.4% Dusk 8 10.3% Pickup 31 18.6% Dark-Lighted 7 9.0% School Bus 1 0.6% Day Crashes %Dark-Not Lighted 5 6.4% Medium/Heavy Truck 2 1.2% Sunday 2 2.6% Unknown 1 1.3% Low-Speed Vehicle 2 1.2% Monday 12 15.4% Totals 78 100.0% Other 3 1.8% Tuesday 18 23.1%Unknown 4 2.4% Wednesday 11 14.1%Totals 167 100.0% Thursday 13 16.7%Junc. Relation Crashes % Friday 17 21.8% Intersection 51 65.4% Saturday 5 6.4% Driveway/Alley 8 10.3%Crash Severity Crashes % Totals 78 100.0% Non-Junction 18 23.1% Fatal 0 0.0% Unkown 1 1.3% Injury Crash 21 26.9% Totals 78 100.0%Prop. Damage Only 57 73.1% Time of Day Crashes %Totals 78 100.0% Before 6:00 am 1 1.3% 6:00 am - 9:00 am 9 11.5%Intersection Crashes % 9:00 am- 12:00 pm 7 9.0% South 19th Avenue 12 23.5% 12:00 pm - 3:00 pm 17 21.8% South 11th Avenue 10 19.6% 3:00 pm - 6:00 pm 32 41.0% South 7th Avenue 12 23.5% 6:00 pm - 9:00 pm 6 7.7% Willson Avenue 17 33.3% After 9:00 pm 6 7.7% Totals 51 100.0% Totals 78 100.0% Table 3: Crash Summary Tables 507 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 13 The main observed collision type was rear-end crashes (48 crashes/61.5 percent), of which 43 crashes were slowing, stopped in traffic, or moving essentially straight ahead. This could imply the need for a reduction of queuing caused by poor intersection operations, or could be due to vehicles stopping unexpectedly for pedestrians crossing Kagy Boulevard. The next most common collision types were right-angle and left turn/opposite direction, accounting for only six crashes (7.7%) each. Fifty-one (51) of the 78 crashes (65.4%) were classified as intersection- related and another eight (10.3%) were classified as occurring at a driveway or alley. Somewhat surprisingly, given the climate in Bozeman, 50 of the 78 crashes (64.1%) occurred under dry road conditions. November, September, and June realized the three highest crash totals on month-basis in that order, which also implies that weather driving conditions are not necessarily a driving factor. Additional crash data was obtained from the City of Bozeman from 2019 through mid-2020, with 12 crashes reported during that timeframe just at the South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection, four of which were injury crashes. Detailed crash information was not available, but this large increase to 12 crashes in just under a two-year period (compared to 10 total crashes in the four years from 2011-2014) may signify a riskier turning and gap acceptance behavior by drivers. 6.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Project Area Planned Developments & Traffic Volume Projection Methodology A memo detailing the traffic volume projection methodology was completed and submitted to the City of Bozeman and MDT for initial review on August 16, 2022. The memo was updated after further discussions with the City and MDT and resubmitted on December 20, 2022. That memo is attached in Appendix D. A summary of the projection strategy is presented in the following paragraphs. Sanderson Stewart completed a review of existing proposals for known developments that are most likely to impact the Kagy Boulevard corridor, as well as considering potential development for other properties that are currently undeveloped. The original traffic projections calculated in 2015 were based on 13 properties east of South 19th Avenue and restricted to a 1-mile radius from Kagy Boulevard. Most of those projects remain partially or fully undeveloped. For the 2022 projection calculations, a larger radius was reviewed, extending south to Goldenstein Lane and west to Fowler Lane. This resulted in 32 properties likely to be developed. These 32 parcels are shown in a figure in the attached volume projections memo and are also summarized in a table in the same memo. That table also provides a summary of the planned or assumed land use, number of units, and resulting weekday, AM, and PM peak hour trip generation. The trip generation calculations include reductions for internal capture trips within each development where applicable, as well as reductions for pass-by and multi- modal (bicycle/pedestrian/transit) trips. All developments were assumed to be 100% built out 508 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 14 for the Design Year of 2045. All of the projected developments combined result in approximately 9,935 additional dwelling units on the south side of Bozeman. Assuming an average of two persons per dwelling unit, this equates to a population increase of 19,870 people. In 2015, Sanderson Stewart requested assistance from the Western Transportation Institute (WTI) to estimate the projected shift in traffic associated with the then-unconstructed Graf Street and South 11th Avenue connections, using the model WTI created for the City of Bozeman. These connections are now complete, and Stucky Road is currently under construction to extend east of South 19th Avenue. West Arnold Street is also anticipated to be extended to South 19th Avenue in the future, and Fowler Lane was assumed to be constructed between Stucky Road and West Garfield Street for the purposes of this volume projection analysis. Therefore, 20% of the future northbound/southbound thru volumes on South 19th Avenue at Kagy Boulevard were removed to account for this planned roadway connection based on roadway capacity described in the Bozeman Transportation Master Plan and an anticipated utilization percentage of the new segment of Fowler Lane. Additionally, turning movements at this intersection were adjusted to account for the connection of Kagy Boulevard to Fowler Lane. For example, 20% of westbound right turns were converted to westbound thru movements. All of the above connections and other potential new connections along Kagy Boulevard were accounted for when performing the traffic assignment calculations for future traffic volumes generated by each development. The combination of existing traffic and 100% buildout of all 32 anticipated area developments results in the Design Year (2045) traffic volume projections shown in Figure 4 on the following page. Projected AADTs on Kagy Boulevard range from 21,300 vehicles per day (vpd) to 27,300 vpd and resulting annual growth rates range from 2.0% to 3.9%. These growth rates are very similar to what was projected in the 2015 analysis. Once the 2045 projections were completed, additional projections for an Interim Year of 2035 were calculated assuming linear growth between 2022 and 2045. Due to the uncertainty of development timelines and potential transit expansion in the area, amongst other factors, this midpoint was chosen for completion of a sensitivity analysis for the corridor. The Interim Year (2035) projections are shown in Figure 5 on page 16. Pedestrian Volume Projections Anticipated pedestrian trips from nearby new developments were calculated based on the multi-modal reductions assumed for the 32 properties described in the previous section. Pedestrian trips were assigned along and across the Kagy Boulevard corridor based on the location of each development. Projected Design Year (2045) pedestrian trips are shown in Figure 3 on page 9. 509 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson, UPN 8931000, Page 15 510 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson, UPN 8931000, Page 16 511 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 17 The projected Design Year (2045) pedestrian volumes are up to seven times higher than existing pedestrian volumes at the Kagy Boulevard/South 11th Avenue intersection and nearly twice as high at the Kagy Boulevard/South 7th Avenue intersection. At the Kagy Boulevard/South 19th Avenue intersection, existing pedestrian volumes were virtually zero, and projected volumes are approximately 100 total crossings during each peak hour in the Design Year (2045). Increasing pedestrian demand will continue to impact vehicle LOS through the corridor, specifically at South 11th Avenue, the pedestrian hybrid beacon crossing at east Bobcat Circle, and the rectangular rapid flashing beacon crossing at South 7th Avenue. As vehicle and pedestrian volumes increase along the corridor the potential for conflict will also increase. Under the current configurations, pedestrians must compete with right-turn-on-red and permissive left-turning vehicles, which are both situations where drivers may not be looking for pedestrians before turning, causing a safety concern. One safe alternative for pedestrians to cross busy multi-lane streets would be to install grade-separated crossings. Design Year (2045) Traffic Signal Warrants Traffic signal warrants were evaluated for the intersection of Kagy Boulevard and South 7th Avenue for the Design Year (2045) scenario. The analysis results showed that Warrants 1-3 (Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume, and Peak Hour) are projected to be met, along with the Roadway Network warrant. Design Year (2045) traffic signal warrant worksheets are attached in Appendix C. Corridor Capacity Several corridor alternatives were evaluated, including two-lane, three-lane, four-lane, and five- lane options. For the purposes of this study, the main alternatives will be referred to as “three- lane” and “five-lane" typical sections. Each of the alternatives is assumed to include one (three- lane) or two (five-lane) thru lanes in each direction with either a center two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) or median separation with left-turn lanes. A center TWLTL would allow traffic in either direction to make left turns to and from Kagy Boulevard and would increase roadway capacity by removing turning vehicles from the thru lane. A divided roadway with medians and dedicated left-turn lanes would allow for access control to be implemented where desired along the corridor and reduce opportunities for collisions between vehicles attempting to perform conflicting movements. Theoretical capacities of roadway sections were obtained from the 2017 Bozeman Transportation Master Plan (TMP) for the purposes of evaluating volume/capacity (v/c) ratios for existing and projected volumes along Kagy Boulevard. However, actual capacity of a roadway can vary greatly based on a variety of factors such as access control and spacing, intersection spacing, speed limit, and the presence of crosswalks, for example. The following calculations are meant to serve as a high-level evaluation of potential corridor operations with 512 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 18 varying roadway sections. Any v/c ratios greater than 1.0 are generally considered to be failing values and are shown in red in Table 4. A two-lane roadway section has a theoretical capacity of 12,000 vpd, a three-lane section has 18,000 vpd, a four-lane section has 24,000 vpd, and a five-lane section has a 32,000 vpd theoretical capacity. Calculated v/c ratios for each corridor segment are presented in Table 4 below. Intersection Capacity Capacity calculations at each intersection for the Design Year (2045) and Interim Year (2035) scenarios were performed using Synchro, Version 11 (signals) and SIDRA, Version 9 (roundabouts). Capacity results at each intersection for the new corridor alternatives listed above are presented in the following paragraphs. For the purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that any LOS D or better would be considered acceptable for the Design Year (2045) scenario. Detailed capacity worksheets for the Design Year (2045) are attached in Appendix E and Interim Year (2035) capacity worksheets are attached in Appendix F. South 19th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard For the three-lane scenario with only minor traffic signal timing and phasing changes, including protected left-turn phasing and overlap right-turn phasing (where applicable), this intersection is projected to operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS D during the PM peak hour in the Design Year (2045). In the five-lane scenario, dual southbound left-turn lanes were modeled. With this configuration, the intersection is projected to operate at LOS D during Table 4: Corridor V/C Ratio Comparison S 19th Ave to S 11th Ave S 11th Ave to S 7th Ave S 7th Ave to S Willson Ave 2022 1.13 1.14 0.93 2035 1.49 1.72 1.46 2045 1.78 2.15 1.88 2022 0.75 0.76 0.62 2035 0.99 1.14 0.97 2045 1.18 1.43 1.25 2022 0.56 0.57 0.46 2035 0.75 0.86 0.73 2045 0.89 1.08 0.94 2022 0.42 0.43 0.35 2035 0.56 0.64 0.55 2045 0.67 0.81 0.70 2-lane (12,000) 3-lane (18,000) 4-lane (24,000) 5-lane (32,000) v/c ratioCorridor Alternative (capacity) Year 513 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 19 both peak hours in 2045. Table 5 below shows the 2045 capacity results at South 19th Avenue. In the Interim Year (2035) scenario, the intersection is projected to operate at LOS C or better for both the three-lane and five-lane alternatives, and results for the five-lane alternative for 2035 are shown in Table 6 below. Table 5: South 19th Avenue Intersection Design Year (2045) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 50.8 D 15 53.6 D 14 WB 37.2 D 7 43.2 D 8 NB 66.0 E 25 48.5 D 18 SB 63.1 E 27 47.4 D 23 Intersection 57.8 E --47.7 D -- EB 52.9 D 14 52.3 D 13 WB 39.6 D 14 53.8 D 16 NB 38.3 D 22 33.9 C 15 SB 45.7 D 17 48.8 D 23 Intersection 43.1 D --46.7 D -- South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Table 6: South 19th Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 40.3 D 10 36.7 D 9 WB 36.8 D 7 44.1 D 9 NB 27.4 C 15 28.1 C 11 SB 25.6 C 17 25.3 C 14 Intersection 30.4 C --32.4 C -- EB 38.4 D 10 35.6 D 9 WB 36.8 D 8 37.6 D 14 NB 27.3 C 14 28.3 C 11 SB 36.4 D 10 36.5 D 14 Intersection 33.7 C --34.7 C -- South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard 514 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 20 South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard For the three-lane scenario, both traffic signal control and a single-lane roundabout are projected to operate at LOS F with severe delay and queuing metrics in the Design Year (2045). In evaluating the five-lane alternative, additional turn lanes were evaluated for the traffic signal and roundabout options, and it was found that providing northbound and southbound right-turn lanes in addition to the existing left-turn lanes could improve signalized intersection operations to LOS E or better. A multi-lane roundabout evaluated with right-turn slip lanes on all approaches and left-turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches is projected to operate at LOS F on one approach during each peak hour with lower overall delay values than a traffic signal. Capacity results for the South 11th Avenue intersection are shown in Table 7 on the following page. In the Interim Year (2035) scenario as shown in Table 8 on page 22, both a traffic signal and roundabout are projected to operate at LOS F on multiple approaches with the three-lane alternative. With a five-lane section and additional auxiliary lanes, a traffic signal is projected to operate at LOS D or better and a multi-lane roundabout is projected to operate at LOS C or better. South 7th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard The 7th Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS C or better overall when signalized in both the three-lane and five-lane alternatives in the Design Year (2045). A roundabout in the three-lane alternative is projected to operate at LOS E on the east and west legs and overall, during the AM peak hour, with LOS C during the PM peak hour. An eastbound left-turn lane could improve capacity to LOS D or better, but this would require multiple circulating lanes or a turbo roundabout, which is not thought to be preferred with a three-lane section. The multi- lane roundabout is projected to operate at LOS A. Table 9 on page 23 shows the Design Year (2045) capacity results. In the Interim Year (2035) the intersection is projected to operate at LOS C or better with signal and roundabout control in both alternatives, as shown in Table 10 on page 24. 515 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 21 Table 7: South 11th Avenue Design Year (2045) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 259.8 F 45 186.3 F 40 WB 116.9 F 32 125.4 F 37 NB 304.5 F 57 248.8 F 43 SB 71.4 E 24 235.5 F 39 Intersection 208.5 F --194.2 F -- EB 115.2 F 22 96.5 F 20 WB 98.7 F 19 99.0 F 23 NB 192.6 F 53 111.0 F 38 SB 34.1 C 18 116.3 F 35 Intersection 123.3 F --105.1 F -- EB 58.2 E 16 86.7 F 20 WB 43.9 D 16 42.3 D 19 NB 48.8 D 30 71.0 E 21 SB 50.9 D 19 73.3 E 30 Intersection 50.4 D --66.6 E -- EB 367.1 F 157 278.8 F 124 WB 156.6 F 91 307.3 F 169 NB 358.2 F 186 213.1 F 111 SB 70.2 F 26 270.6 F 113 Intersection 264.6 F --269.3 F -- EB 32.6 D 11 25.2 D 8 WB 12.9 B 5 20.4 C 10 NB 526.2 F 219 277.6 F 127 SB 65.7 F 23 399.6 F 137 Intersection 191.1 F --167.8 F -- EB 22.1 C 6 25.0 C 6 WB 22.3 C 6 29.0 D 10 NB 66.2 F 37 23.7 C 8 SB 32.1 D 8 161.8 F 63 Intersection 37.9 E --55.8 F -- Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + RT slip, N/S LT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + N/S RT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative 516 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 22 Table 8: South 11th Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 90.1 F 37 63.3 E 32 WB 55.0 D 20 39.6 D 30 NB 147.9 F 38 142.8 F 29 SB 41.9 D 13 109.8 F 27 Intersection 92.0 F --83.9 F -- EB 25.8 C 13 29.6 C 16 WB 20.2 C 7 23.6 C 10 NB 42.0 D 18 38.3 D 13 SB 40.1 D 11 46.7 D 17 Intersection 31.4 C --33.4 C -- EB 107.3 F 57 142.6 F 63 WB 41.5 E 24 163.4 F 87 NB 228.2 F 96 90.7 F 39 SB 20.9 C 6 126.1 F 46 Intersection 115.3 F --133.7 F -- EB 10.0 A 3 14.6 B 4 WB 11.3 B 3 11.9 B 4 NB 17.0 C 7 12.0 B 3 SB 10.2 B 3 22.6 C 6 Intersection 12.5 B --14.9 B -- Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative Kagy Boulevard & South 11th Avenue Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + RT slip, N/S LT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + N/S RT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard 517 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 23 Table 9: South 7th Avenue Design Year (2045) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 0.3 A 2 1.0 A 15 WB 2.3 A 34 4.8 A 38 NB 25.3 C 1 34.3 C 2 SB 31.4 C 2 45.2 D 6 Intersection 2.9 A --8.3 A -- EB 4.0 A 2 6.5 A 3 WB 8.1 A 15 11.3 B 13 NB 25.8 C 1 21.8 C 2 SB 24.3 C 2 26.0 C 4 Intersection 6.9 A --11.0 B -- EB 36.9 E 56 26.0 D 23 WB 45.8 E 56 21.0 C 20 NB 10.2 B 1 11.5 B 1 SB 11.1 B 1 21.0 C 4 Intersection 39.3 E --23.1 C -- EB 7.8 A 4 7.3 A 3 WB 8.7 A 3 7.1 A 3 NB 7.9 A 1 8.8 A 1 SB 8.6 A 1 14.3 B 3 Intersection 8.2 A --8.1 A -- South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative 518 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 24 South Willson Avenue/South 3rd Avenue/Kagy Boulevard For the three-lane alternative the intersection is projected to operate at LOS F with both a signal and roundabout in the Design Year (2045). The roundabout was assumed to maintain the existing yield-controlled eastbound and westbound channelized right-turn lanes, and a southbound right-turn slip lane was also added. Multiple lane configurations were evaluated with both signal and roundabout control for the five-lane alternative. With a signal, a channelized southbound right-turn lane was added and the intersection was also evaluated with dual westbound left-turn lanes. However, these dual lanes were not shown to improve capacity and the intersection would operate better with two westbound thru lanes instead, although still at LOS E overall in the AM peak hour. The multilane roundabout was evaluated with right-turn slip lanes on all approaches, and a second scenario with northbound and southbound left-turn lanes was also added. Both scenarios are Table 10: South 7th Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 0.1 A 4 2.0 A 8 WB 1.4 A 24 2.4 A 23 NB 26.3 C 1 20.7 C 2 SB 33.0 C 2 27.9 C 3 Intersection 2.6 A --6.0 A -- EB 3.1 A 3 5.7 A 3 WB 6.6 A 12 9.5 A 11 NB 26.3 C 1 21.8 C 2 SB 24.3 C 1 24.8 C 3 Intersection 5.8 A --10.0 B -- EB 12.4 B 11 11.9 B 11 WB 16.3 C 15 11.1 B 7 NB 7.8 A 1 9.3 A 1 SB 7.9 A 1 13.2 B 3 Intersection 13.8 B --11.7 B -- EB 6.0 A 3 5.9 A 2 WB 6.9 A 2 5.8 A 2 NB 6.5 A 1 7.6 A 1 SB 6.7 A 1 10.5 B 2 Intersection 6.5 A --6.5 A -- Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak 519 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 25 projected to operate at LOS E or worse overall in the Design Year (2045). The capacity results for this intersection are shown in Table 11 below. In the Interim Year (2035) the intersection is projected to operate at LOS D or better with a traffic signal in both the three-lane and five-lane alternatives. A roundabout in the three-lane alternative is projected to operate at LOS F on multiple approaches but a multilane roundabout is projected to operate at LOS C or better. The Interim Year (2035) capacity results are shown in Table 12 on page 26. Table 11: South Willson Avenue Design Year (2045) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 87.1 F 34 84.1 F 31 WB 134.4 F 32 172.2 F 30 NB 99.8 F 32 41.7 D 18 SB 75.5 E 17 96.2 F 26 Intersection 103.9 F --103.5 F -- EB 58.1 E 16 48.8 D 15 WB 61.7 E 24 48.9 D 24 NB 55.2 E 29 35.5 D 18 SB 47.1 D 14 76.3 E 25 Intersection 56.8 E --50.6 D -- EB 49.5 D 12 61.4 E 17 WB 73.0 E 34 62.6 E 30 NB 99.4 F 32 39.4 D 18 SB 65.7 E 17 56.5 E 23 Intersection 74.8 E --55.9 E -- EB 244.8 F 104 339.9 F 141 WB 162.6 F 119 170.4 F 113 NB 523.5 F 215 185.9 F 81 SB 37.7 E 12 87.0 F 40 Intersection 263.0 F --199.9 F -- EB 27.1 D 8 39.8 E 12 WB 36.3 E 16 30.7 D 13 NB 100.9 F 60 32.9 D 12 SB 92.3 F 35 167.3 F 72 Intersection 62.4 F --63.5 F -- EB 33.0 D 9 73.3 F 22 WB 54.9 F 23 29.7 D 12 NB 56.1 F 30 19.7 C 6 SB 27.0 D 7 56.4 F 24 Intersection 45.7 E --44.9 E -- South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + SB/NB RT lanes South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + SB/NB RT, LT lanes Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + SB RT, 2 WB LT lanes South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane 520 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 26 7.0 PROPOSED DESIGN FEATURES Roadway Design Speed The MDT-designated design speed for Kagy Boulevard is 35 mph since it is classified as an urban minor arterial. The City of Bozeman has expressed an interest in reducing this speed to 25 mph. If roundabouts are implemented, the proposed roundabout entry, circulating, and exit fastest-path (ignoring striping) speeds will be designed to less than 30 mph, with an advisory entry speed of 15 mph. The roundabouts will require approaches with alignments containing reverse curves to promote this speed reduction. Access Control Neither MDT or the City of Bozeman currently has an access control or access management plan in place for Kagy Boulevard. Based on discussions with the City and MSU, it is anticipated Table 12: South Willson Avenue Interim Year (2035) Capacity Results Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 20.1 C 21 12.9 B 28 WB 27.5 C 20 23.5 C 18 NB 45.9 D 21 44.8 D 12 SB 46.9 D 10 54.8 D 15 Intersection 34.1 C --30.2 C -- EB 30.0 C 9 30.4 C 11 WB 25.7 C 10 44.5 D 18 NB 43.0 D 20 40.9 D 12 SB 34.7 C 10 51.5 D 14 Intersection 33.5 C --40.6 D -- EB 37.8 E 17 164.5 F 73 WB 51.8 F 39 49.5 E 35 NB 290.2 F 115 66.8 F 23 SB 17.1 C 5 34.5 D 10 Intersection 110.8 F --82.2 F -- EB 11.6 B 3 19.5 C 5 WB 15.6 C 5 12.0 B 4 NB 14.6 B 6 11.8 B 3 SB 11.1 B 2 13.8 B 4 Intersection 13.7 B --14.5 B -- South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + SB/NB RT, LT lanes 521 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 27 that a raised or depressed center median will be considered to restrict access for private approaches and local street intersections regardless of the overall roadway width and to provide landscaping opportunities in the median. A two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) will also be considered to better allow for emergency traffic to pass through the corridor, as a TWLTL provides an additional driving lane compared to median separation. The intersections of Kagy Boulevard with South 19th Avenue, South 11th Avenue, South 7th Avenue, and South Willson Avenue will all continue to be unrestricted in terms of minor approach access. A future extension of South 17th Avenue that would intersect with Kagy Boulevard approximately 600 feet east of South 19th Avenue may also need to be a full-access intersection. Access restrictions such as right-in/right-out or three-quarter (3/4) access will be evaluated at other existing and future intersections in the project corridor. It should also be noted that the private access approach on Kagy Boulevard for the Brick Breeden Fieldhouse parking lot and both approaches at Bobcat Stadium are expected to be closed via this project. Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities This project will perpetuate or construct multi-use paths and/or sidewalks along the north and south sides of Kagy Boulevard as well as on-street bicycle lanes for the entire length of the project. Signalized pedestrian crossings, compliant with PROWAG, will be incorporated at intersections that are controlled with traffic signals, as well as for any multi-lane roundabouts that are constructed. If a single-lane roundabout is implemented, the crosswalks for that intersection would not be signalized. It is not expected that any unsignalized, marked crosswalks will be utilized for this project or that any signalized (via HAWK signals or RRFB systems) mid-block crosswalks would be implemented. Instead, grade-separated tunnel crossings will be recommended at South 11th Avenue and South 7th Avenue and additional grade-separated crossings will be considered at the location of the existing pedestrian hybrid beacon at Stadium Drive and at the Gallagator Trail crossing near South Willson Avenue. The hybrid beacon at Stadium Drive should be removed after the tunnel installations as it would cause frequent, lengthy vehicle backups due to repeated pedestrian actuations, and to emphasize pedestrian tunnel use. The tunnels will be considered for the purpose of providing safe passage across Kagy Boulevard for pedestrians, particularly in conjunction with special events at Bobcat Stadium, without interrupting traffic flow on Kagy Boulevard. Intersection Traffic Control Traffic control for the South 19th Avenue intersection will not be modified through this project. The traffic signal there will remain, likely with lane and timing/phasing modifications to improve capacity. Roundabouts and new or modified traffic signals were evaluated for the South 11th Avenue, South 7th Avenue, and South Willson Avenue intersections. All other intersections are expected to be stop-controlled, though the future intersection with South 17th Avenue could require advanced traffic control if it is constructed as a full-access intersection. 522 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 28 Planned Future Street Network Improvements Since 2015, Graf Street was extended from South 3rd Avenue to South 19th Avenue and South 11th Avenue was extended from Kagy Boulevard south to Graf Street. Stucky Road is currently being constructed between South 19th Avenue and South 11th Avenue, and it is expected that West Arnold Street will also be connected to South 19th Avenue in the coming years. Additionally, it was assumed that Fowler Lane will be connected from Stucky Road north to West Garfield Street for the purposes of this analysis. Some of these connections will likely result in reduced volumes on Kagy Boulevard because they will provide an alternate route for the South 3rd Avenue neighborhoods to get to South 19th Avenue and will also provide alternate routes for neighborhoods further south along South 19th Avenue to get to downtown using South 3rd Avenue/South Willson Avenue. Fowler Lane will also likely reduce traffic demand approaching and crossing the Kagy Boulevard corridor in the study area by serving as an alternate, major north/south route to South 19th Avenue, South 11th Avenue, and South Willson Avenue. It is also possible that South 17th Avenue will be constructed as an additional north-south collector-type street between Kagy Boulevard and Graf Street and possibly to the south of Graf Street. If this additional connection to Kagy Boulevard is constructed, it will most impact traffic patterns on Kagy Boulevard and the existing, major north-south streets in the study area. 8.0 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Selection Criteria A list of criteria was established to evaluate how each would be impacted by the proposed corridor and intersection alternatives. These criteria are defined in the following paragraphs. A decision matrix was then developed to compare each corridor and intersection alternative based on these factors. The matrices are presented in Tables 13 (corridors) and 14 (intersections) on pages 34 and 35. Safety Performance Safety performance is typically associated with the number and rate of crashes, and the severity of these crashes. It is directly related to the number of conflict points, the number of users on the facility, and the user’s ability to safety and efficiently perform the driving or walking tasks. Intersections have more conflict points, and therefore more concerns regarding safety. Additional lanes of traffic offer more crossing conflicts, both for turning vehicles and for multi- modal uses. Multi-Modal The comfort level of pedestrians and bicyclists correlates with the presence and quality of available facilities (sidewalks, bike lanes), distance from traffic, the number of lanes on the 523 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 29 adjacent roadway, the speed and amount of traffic present, and the ability of the non-motorized user to reach their destinations along the corridor. Crossing distances are increased at intersections with more dedicated left and right lanes or additional thru lanes. Mid-block crossings should be discouraged in high traffic volume conditions unless a grade separated facility is provided. Increased congestion may contribute to drivers paying less attention to non- motorized users and can drive up the discomfort level of multi-modal users. Construction Cost Construction costs are the dollars spent on all roadway related improvements, including sidewalks, adjacent landscaping, removal or replacement of existing infrastructure, and traffic control. While costs increase incrementally with the addition of traffic lanes, they are disproportionate to the percentage increase of pavement. For instance, a four-lane facility is not twice as expensive to construct as a two-lane facility. Capacity & Operations The ability to move traffic is at its highest at uninterrupted sections of roadway. Introducing access points, intersections, pedestrian crossings, and any other features will degrade the capacity. Traffic control devices meant to enhance the operations and safety of a facility also reduce the capacity of the facility. If demand (volume) is more than the roadway can accommodate (capacity), the roadway will become congested to the point of failure. Only by physically metering traffic can the gridlock be eventually eliminated. Increasing capacity will reduce congestion, but only to the extent that it can handle the demand. If the unmet demand is large enough, additional lanes will soon become congested as well. Truck Movements & Access A large truck requires full width lanes and wide turning radii to comfortably navigate a roadway network. Multi-lane facilities allow for other traffic to comfortably pass larger, slower moving trucks, and will accommodate side-by-side truck passage as necessary. Aesthetics Multi-lane facilities in urban areas create both a visual and a physical barrier in many instances between properties on either side of the roadway. Large urban signalized intersections are visually devoid of any aesthetic treatments out of necessity; the entirety of the roadway surface is required for traffic. Some aesthetic improvements can be made in these scenarios such as within raised medians, boulevards, and intersection corners. Well-designed multi-modal treatments adjacent to the roadway can also mitigate these impacts, and grade separated crossings for non-motorized users will also encourage cohesion between the properties that they access. 524 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 30 Right-of-Way & Utility Impacts Often roadway improvements can be made within the existing public right-of-way. Once a facility’s needs grow beyond this, new right-of-way needs to be acquired from adjacent private landowners for the expansion. Utilities are typically relocated at this time to the edge of the new right-of-way. Public utilities such as storm water and municipal water lines are often impacted as well. Unimproved ground is less impactful to the adjacent landowners if needed, while impacts to parking and buildings themselves are avoided unless absolutely necessary for the safety and operations of the roadway. EMS A wider roadway provides EMS with additional room to maneuver around congestion and traffic attempting to yield to these vehicles. The presence of a TWLTL or other turn lane provides responders an alternate route as well. A raised median could be designed to be mountable at the new fire station access to allow EMS to make a left turn out of the station. Corridor Alternative Comparison A discussion of the considerations for determining a preferred street cross section (three-lane vs. five-lane) based on the matrix analysis is presented in the following paragraphs. A street section with one lane per direction is typically safer than a section with multiple thru lanes because it has fewer conflict points. However, once a narrower section becomes over capacity there may be an increase in aggressive and risky gap acceptance behaviors by drivers between queued vehicles due to an inability to make turning and crossing movements in failing operational conditions. Excessive queuing and traffic backups through the corridor could also lead to an increase in rear end crashes specifically. A five-lane section which allows for increased capacity and reduced queuing may have comparatively fewer crashes of that type, but a multilane section would likely have a higher frequency of lane-change-associated crashes and a wider section is more dangerous for multi-modal users due to the need to cross extra traffic lanes. A five-lane section would allow more room for emergency vehicles, which will be directly accessing Kagy Boulevard from the new fire station. A wider section is also preferred for ease of truck movements, although Kagy Boulevard does not experience a high volume of heavy vehicles. Construction costs for each alternative are expected to be similar in magnitude, as both will require reconstructing the roadway to provide additional facilities such as bike lanes, but there will be increased costs associated with the additional width of the five-lane section. Right-of-way impacts and public/stakeholder feedback favor a narrower section, which is also considered to be more aesthetically pleasing. Projected capacity implications for each alternative are described in detail as follows. With a three-lane section it is projected that either signal or roundabout control would result in lengthy traffic backups and gridlock along the corridor. Even with all signals coordinated, traffic approaching South 11th Avenue on Kagy Boulevard from both directions is projected to 525 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 31 back up into the South 19th Avenue and South 7th Avenue intersections in both the Interim Year (2035) and Design Year (2045) scenarios with stopped and rolling queues. With single- lane roundabouts, metering (traffic signals installed at entrances to the roundabout) would likely become required to manage queues along the corridor during peak hours in the future. The metering signals would not need to be installed initially; layouts could be designed to provide space for the infrastructure in the future and conduits could be put in to accommodate later installation. Depending on the traffic demand levels throughout the day, there may be several hours where corridor and intersection volumes exceed capacity, resulting in the need for metering for a larger portion of the day. The existing hourly distribution of daily traffic volumes showed levels at least as high as the AM peak during at least four hours per day on all segments of the corridor and up to seven hours. During the times where the roundabouts do not need metering, vehicle idling time would be greatly reduced and the roundabouts would have a lesser impact on air quality compared to conventional signals. With a five-lane section, corridor capacity is projected to be greatly improved from the three- lane alternative, and typical queuing would be less extensive, greatly reducing the potential for gridlock conditions during peak traffic periods. Individual intersections are projected to continue to experience failing capacity for the Design Year (2045) peak hours with both traffic signals and roundabouts, and metering may still become necessary to balance capacity at roundabouts during peak demand conditions nearing the horizon year. Intersection Alternative Comparison A discussion of the considerations for determining major intersection traffic control (traffic signals vs. roundabouts) based on the matrix analysis is presented in the following paragraphs. Roundabouts typically have lower crash rates and are safer than signalized intersections because there are significantly fewer conflict points and due to the inherent speed reduction that is required to drive through a roundabout. Signalized intersections have a higher likelihood of severe crashes due to the potential for right-angle crashes, especially during off-peak hours where there are lower volumes and drivers may therefore choose higher speeds. Pedestrian and bicycle crashes at roundabouts are also generally low, but these user groups have expressed discomfort when navigating roundabouts compared to conventional signalization. This discomfort is potentially due to both driver and pedestrian unfamiliarity at roundabouts and the need to rely on drivers yielding compared to a traffic signal where pedestrians receive a clear “walk” indication. However, at a four-lane signalized facility with auxiliary turn lanes the crossing distances can become so large that they are perceived as unreasonable, uncomfortable, and dangerous, and mobility-challenged users are often not provided enough time to cross comfortably because the walk time required could lead to longer phase and cycle lengths that may greatly impact intersection operations. Additionally, right-on-red crashes involving pedestrians and bicycles pose a significant risk for multi-modal users and typically result in injury or death. A roundabout allows for pedestrians to cross against just one direction of traffic at a 526 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 32 time, with a median refuge allowing for two-stage crossings. At a multi-lane roundabout, pedestrians would typically have to cross a maximum of two lanes at a time. Roundabouts are also considered to be more aesthetically pleasing, due to the décor/landscape opportunities provided by the central island. Roundabout central island treatments can be designed to satisfy public and stakeholder opinions but maintenance of these features after construction requires more effort and resources than would typically be associated with a non-roundabout intersection. Roundabouts can offer reductions in average delay per vehicle especially in uncongested conditions because vehicles either stop very briefly or not at all compared to a red light. Signalized intersections typically have lower construction costs than roundabouts because roundabouts require total reconstruction of an intersection, whereas conventional intersections can sometimes be retrofitted with traffic signals without requiring full reconstruction. In addition, roundabouts often require additional curbing, stamped concrete truck aprons, enhanced landscape/aesthetic improvements, and may require concrete surfacing for the intersection approaches and circulating lanes. Roundabouts often also require right-of- way acquisition in the intersection corners that may not be required for a conventional intersection. Both signalized intersections and roundabouts can be designed to accommodate trucks, although some truck drivers may be uncomfortable driving roundabouts. Signals can be preempted to allow clear passage of emergency vehicles through the intersection. Drivers may not intuitively clear roundabouts when approached by emergency vehicles due to confusion about whether to take the first available exit or their intended exit, but the truck apron does provide extra width to use in an emergency. Crashes within roundabouts can also be cause for concern if drivers are unwilling or unable to move the vehicles, as this will cause temporary intersection failure and congestion throughout the entire system. Traffic signals through the corridor could be coordinated with South 19th Avenue to provide for progressive operation from one end to the other. Coordination and signal plans can also be time-of-day specific to cater to traffic flows that may vary in direction during different peak periods. More detailed evaluations of factors specifically affecting each study intersection are described in the following sections. South 19th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard This intersection was evaluated against the previously described selection criteria with both a traffic signal and a roundabout to maintain consistency across the analysis. However, it has previously been communicated that a roundabout would not be considered at the intersection. A multi-lane roundabout likely would operate poorly due to very high volumes on all four approaches and would interrupt the flow of traffic from existing signals along the South 19th Avenue corridor. Additionally, the right-of-way/utility impacts and construction costs of converting from a signal to a roundabout would be substantial and the public does not support a roundabout option here. 527 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 33 South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard Both a signal and roundabout are projected to operate at failing capacity at this intersection in the Design Year (2045), even with multiple auxiliary turn lanes in the five-lane alternative. A traffic signal is projected to allow for notably better operations on the southbound approach during the PM peak hour, but a roundabout provides lower overall seconds-per-vehicle delay during both the peak hours and off-peak hours. In the Interim Year (2035), a roundabout is projected to operate with lower delay than a signal with a five-lane section. However, construction costs and right-of-way/utility impacts both favors maintaining signalized operations at this intersection. South 7th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard The South 7th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection projects favorable operations with either a signal or roundabout. Almost all of the selection criteria are very similar when comparing the two with only a few criteria showing notable differences in preference. A signal is preferred for truck and emergency access and a roundabout is preferred based on safety, aesthetics, and public feedback. Ultimately, the type of control chosen at this intersection should create a consistent driver expectation along the corridor. If signals are determined to be preferred at all of the other corridor intersections, a signal would be preferred at South 7th Avenue so that all intersections could run with a coordinated plan. South Willson Avenue/Kagy Boulevard The South Willson Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection is projected to operate at failing capacity in the Design Year (2045) with both a traffic signal and roundabout, even with a five- lane cross section. Overall delay and queuing values are similar for both a traffic signal and roundabout, but not all auxiliary lanes evaluated for the multilane roundabout may fit within the available intersection right-of-way. In the Interim Year (2035) a roundabout is projected to provide lower vehicle delay in the five-lane alternative, but a signal would operate better with the three-lane alternative. This intersection currently already has right-turn slip lanes on the east and west approaches and the east leg is designed to retroactively accommodate a five-lane section with the existing signal if needed, so construction and right-of-way costs would be much lower to maintain signalization. Public feedback did not provide a clear preference for one or the other, and truck and emergency access both favor a signal. 528 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 34 Safety Performance Multi-modal Design Year Capacity & Operations Construction Cost Truck Movements & Access Aesthetics Right-of-Way & Utility Impacts Stakeholder/ Public Feedback EMS Low Scoring Medium Scoring Legend High Scoring Criteria 5-lane S 19th Ave to S 11th Ave S 11th Ave to S 7th Ave S 7th Ave to S Willson Ave 3-lane 5-lane 3-lane 5-lane 3-lane Table 13: Corridor Decision Matrix 529 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 35 Safety Performance Multi-modal Design Year Capacity & Operations Construction Cost Truck Movements & Access Aesthetics Right-of-Way & Utility Impacts Stakeholder/ Public Feedback EMS Legend High Scoring Medium Scoring Low Scoring Criteria Roundabout Signal Roundabout S 19th Ave & Kagy Blvd S 11th Ave & Kagy Blvd S 7th Ave & Kagy Blvd S Willson Ave & Kagy Blvd Signal Roundabout Signal Roundabout Signal Table 14: Intersection Decision Matrix 530 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 36 9.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary of Analysis This report documents the results of a preliminary traffic evaluation study conducted for the Kagy Boulevard – South 19th to Willson project. The purpose of the study was to evaluate existing and future traffic operations and safety conditions and to establish traffic-based design parameters for the reconstruction project. The following paragraphs summarize the results of the analysis conducted for this study. An existing conditions analysis of intersection capacity showed that the eastbound and westbound approaches at the South 19th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection and the northbound approach at the South 7th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection currently operate at LOS D during the AM peak hour. All other intersections and approaches operate at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak periods. A crash history analysis was performed for the corridor for the four-year period between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. During that time, 78 crashes were reported within the limits of the study. Rear-end collisions were by far the most common type reported, making up approximately 62% of all crashes in the corridor. Additional crash data obtained from 2019 and 2020 at just the South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection showed 12 crashes reported, signaling a possible trend of riskier turning and gap acceptance behavior by drivers leading to increased crash rates. It is anticipated that significant development will continue to occur adjacent to and south of Kagy Boulevard by the design year, with nearly 20,000 new residents expected in the south side of Bozeman by 2045. Sanderson Stewart calculated Design Year (2045) traffic projections based on an evaluation of ongoing and planned area developments. Projections for an Interim Year of 2035 were also calculated to evaluate a midpoint scenario for traffic operations. Intersection capacity was evaluated for the Design Year (2045) scenario with three-lane and five-lane alternative scenarios. Calculation results showed that the three-lane alternative is projected to fail at all intersections with both signals and roundabouts, with the exception of the South 7th Avenue intersection which is projected to operate at LOS D or better with a signal. The five-lane alternative is projected to provide much improved vehicle delay values, but many approaches at the South 11th Avenue and South Willson Avenue intersections are still projected to operate at LOS F in the Design Year (2045). Capacity results in the Interim Year (2035) show much better operations in the five-lane scenario, with LOS D or better for both signals and roundabouts at all intersections, with generally lower delay at roundabouts. Several selection criteria were established to compare 531 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 37 potential design alternatives throughout the corridor the impact of each alternative was assessed in an attempt to determine a preferred design configuration. Recommendations Unless other measures independent to this project are taken, Kagy Boulevard will remain the only east/west arterial route across the southeastern portion of Bozeman. Traffic congestion will increase in all hours of the day, intersection levels of service will continue to decline, and the lack of alternate traffic connections will fuel driver discontent. South 11th Avenue is the next north/south connection east of South 19th Avenue, and absent additional improvements to other connections such as South Willson Avenue, it will continue to face increasingly high traffic demands. From the volumes of public opinion, a narrower roadway section with roundabouts would better reflect the character of this area as it is today, which is that of an interface between campus and recreation, museum, and residential. However, leaving the number of traffic lanes as they are today does not address any of the identified issues, and adding roundabouts to the intersections of Kagy Boulevard with South 11th Avenue, South 7th Avenue, and South Willson Avenue would not add any significant benefits to the corridor without some increases in roadway capacity. Constructing a five-lane facility with turn lanes, multiple access points, and signalized intersections embraces the conventional wisdom that traffic is inevitable, and maximizing capacity is the greatest good for the public dollar. This can result in a perceived severing of physical connectivity between the two roadsides and will create a transportation corridor similar to that of what North and South 19th Avenue has become. Commercial development tends to displace other land uses along these corridors, and the nature of the corridor will potentially transform over time. The selection of any lesser alternative commits decision makers and planners to seek additional solutions to the area’s burgeoning growth and corresponding traffic demands. The final roadway configuration should be consistent with the community’s vision of the corridor. Decision makers should consider not only traffic projections, traffic modelling, and projected growth patterns, but also the vision of the area and what is appropriate for the environment. This approach of complete streets looks to all users, including cars, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit. If the roundabout configuration with additional traffic lanes is selected, changes to traffic circulation patterns, the development of alternative routes, and allowing connectivity through the large areas displaced by Montana State University should all be considered, and if reasonable planned and funded without delay. The alternative that best recognizes the immediate needs of the existing traffic while reflecting the nature of the corridor is that of balance. Roundabouts at the intersections of South 7th 532 STPU 1212(7); Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson UPN 8931000 Page 38 Avenue and South 11th Avenue coupled with an additional thru lane in each direction of Kagy Boulevard, along with improvements to the traffic signals at South 19th Avenue and South Willson Avenue are the best fit for this corridor based on all the competing needs of the corridor. One design element that should be implemented independent of the roadway width and intersection control alternatives selected is that of grade-separated pedestrian crossing tunnels at South 11th Avenue and South 7th Avenue. Tunnels should also be considered at the Gallagator Trail crossing, the existing location of the pedestrian hybrid beacon at Bobcat Circle, and across South 19th Avenue. The volume of crossing pedestrians during normal daily operations as well as sporting events overloads the existing roadway, and the current practice of shutting down traffic on Kagy Boulevard during these times is unsustainable. Expansion of the existing Streamline bus service to provide more routes to the south side of town and campus should also be considered, as that may help reduce vehicle demand along the corridor. 533 APPENDIX A – TRAFFIC COUNT DATA & MEMO 534 MEMORANDUM To: Jason Senn, MDT Consultant Design CC: Taylor Lonsdale/Nick Ross, City of Bozeman From: Tessa Wermers, Sanderson Stewart Date: 1/26/2023 Reference: UPN 8931000; Kagy Blvd S. 19th to Willson – Traffic Data Memo The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a summary of current traffic volumes, prepared by Sanderson Stewart for the Kagy Blvd S. 19th to Willson project. This memorandum is presented to MDT and the City of Bozeman for comment prior to moving forward with traffic projections and capacity analysis at intersections. Existing Traffic Volumes Sanderson Stewart completed the initial traffic data collection effort for this project in April 2015 under the MDT Traffic Engineering Term Contract. The traffic data was collected prior to graduation to ensure Montana State University’s classes would still be in session. During the fall 2015 semester, the City of Bozeman expressed concerns about traffic operations (queuing in particular) for the South 11th Avenue and Kagy Boulevard intersection and asked Sanderson Stewart to evaluate that intersection. It was presumed that the new student housing complex recently constructed in the southwest corner of the intersection had led to the breakdown in operations. Peak hour counts were collected at the intersection in September 2015 to evaluate the impacts of the new student housing complex. The September 2015 counts showed a greater than 20% increase in peak hour entering volumes and up to 12 times the number of bikes and pedestrians as compared to the April 2015 counts. In order to further investigate that variation in the traffic counts for the purposes of the Kagy Boulevard project, MDT subsequently approved an amendment to recount the major intersections along the corridor. The additional counts at the four main intersections were completed in October 2015. ADT counts were not processed at the Kagy Boulevard/South 19th Avenue intersection in April of 2015, nor at the Kagy Boulevard/South Willson Avenue intersection in the Fall 2015 counts. Current traffic data was collected by Sanderson Stewart in April 2022 in support of the restarted project. It is expected that significant changes to traffic patterns have occurred in the study area due to several recent developments in proximity to Kagy Boulevard, the connection of South 11th Avenue to Graf Street, and the extension of Graf Street to South 19th Avenue. Table 1 on the following page shows a summary of 2015 and 2022 collected ADT volumes where available at each intersection. Turning movement and ADT count data from April 2015 is shown in Attachment A, Fall 2015 data is shown in Attachment B, and April 2022 data is in Attachment C. 535 January 26, 2023 2 Trends in Sanderson Stewart Data By comparing the April 2015, October 2015, and April 2022 volumes collected by Sanderson Stewart, general trends can be observed in the traffic volumes. In general, all approaches on Kagy Boulevard were recorded to have lower volumes in 2022 compared to 2015 except for west of South 19th Avenue. South 19th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard It was observed at the South 19th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection that each leg except the east leg had an increase in 2022 collected ADTs compared to 2015 data. The total entering volume (TEV) at the intersection experienced an approximately 9% increase from October 2015 to April 2022. The west leg experienced a 38% increase in April 2022, but the east leg decreased to 88% of the October 2015 value. South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard At the South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection, decreases in collected volumes were observed from 2015 to 2022 on the east and west legs, with moderate growth on the north leg and substantial growth on the south leg. There was an approximately 9% increase in TEV at the intersection between October 2015 and April 2022. However, volumes on the east and west legs are on average 92% of the October 2015 values. South 7th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard also showed volume decreases between 2015 and 2022 on either side of its intersection with South 7th Avenue, while increased volumes were recorded on the north and south legs. The April 2022 TEV at this intersection is approximately 90% of the October 2015 values, with the west leg at 95% and the east leg at 73% of the October 2015 values. Table 1: Sanderson Stewart Collected ADT Comparison East West North South East West North South 2015 Spring 14300 13218 6278 1497 2015 Fall 14945 1366 18191 12753 14982 14429 6720 2570 2022 Spring 13518 1810 19663 13466 13734 12881 7825 7622 East West North South East West North South 2015 Spring 15073 15861 2631 493 12671 14707 8653 9972 2015 Fall 14561 15307 2640 574 2022 Spring 11107 13643 3946 743 11249 10743 7224 6492 Kagy & 7th Kagy & Willson Kagy & 19th Kagy & 11th 536 January 26, 2023 3 South Willson Avenue/Kagy Boulevard At the South Willson Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection, 2022 collected ADTs were lower on all four legs than 2015 volumes. The April 2022 TEV at the intersection is approximately 95% of the October 2015 value. April 2022 AM and PM peak hour volumes on the east and west legs are on average 92% of the October 2015 values. Trends in MDT Data by Corridor By evaluating MDT’s AADT data along Kagy Boulevard from 2015-2021, general trends can be observed in the traffic volumes. The following discussion is based on data from MDT count stations 16-3B-082, 16-3B-083, and 16-3B-084 presented in Table 2 below. In general, 2021 AADTs have decreased on Kagy Boulevard east of South 7th Avenue and have increased west of South 7th Avenue. South 19th Avenue to South 11th Avenue MDT’s data showed a large increase in volumes on this corridor between 2015 and 2016 (25%), and again between 2018 and 2019 (42%). In 2017, volumes decreased to 86% of the 2016 values. The total increase from 2015 to 2021 was 53%. South 11th Avenue to South 7th Avenue Historical MDT data shows fluctuating volumes with a general growth trend of 20% on this corridor from 2015 to 2021. Volumes increased by 15% from 2015 to 2016 before decreasing in 2017 to 83% of the 2016 values. A single year jump of 26% is shown between 2018 and 2019. South 7th Avenue to South Willson Avenue MDT data collected on Kagy Boulevard between South 7th Avenue and South Willson Avenue shows decreasing volumes since 2015. The largest drop occurred in 2020, where volumes decreased to 73% of the 2019 value. Overall, the 2021 AADT was recorded to be 70% of the 2015 AADT. 16-3B-082 16-3B-083 16-3B-084 16-3B-085 19th to 11th 11th to 7th 7th to Willson East of Willson 2015 11620 12450 14270 5570 2016 14539 14303 14413 12755 2017 12451 11824 14168 12538 2018 12463 11836 12526 12843 2019 17720 14867 12601 11067 2020 16480 13826 9257 10292 2021 17798 14932 9998 11308 Kagy Boulevard Corridor AADT (MDT) Table 2: MDT Historical AADT Comparison 537 January 26, 2023 4 East of South Willson Avenue Year-to-year decreasing volume trends were also observed in MDT’s historical data east of South Willson Avenue, with a low value recorded in 2015. The 2021 AADT was 89% of the 2016 value. Influence Factors Several factors have influenced the volume trends seen at the project intersections and along the Kagy Boulevard corridor. One of the most influential factors is the addition or connection of new roadways in the Bozeman area. In 2017, Graf Street was connected from South 19th Avenue to just west of South 3rd Avenue. This provided an alternate route from Kagy Boulevard for traffic going east or west to/from south Bozeman. This impact can be seen at MDT count stations 16-3B-082 and 16-3B-083, which show a decrease in traffic recorded from 2016 to 2017 on Kagy Boulevard between South 19th Avenue and South 7th Avenue. Another new connection was made in 2019 with the construction of South 11th Avenue between Opportunity Way and Graf Street. This, along with construction of several student housing developments south of Kagy Boulevard, has provided a boost of new traffic on the south leg of the South 11th Avenue/Kagy Boulevard intersection. Based on Sanderson Stewart’s collected data, that leg has grown from ADTs of 1,500 in the spring of 2015 and 2,600 in the fall of 2015, to 7,600 in the spring of 2022. Another factor influencing traffic patterns on Kagy Boulevard is the closure of Grant Street on Montana State University’s campus between Bobcat Circle and the SUB access loop just west of South 7th Avenue. This segment has been closed to vehicle traffic since March 2019 and is anticipated to be closed permanently and converted into a pedestrian-only corridor. Based on MDT’s count data, the closure of this major east/west route through campus appears to have initially resulted in large volume increases on Kagy Boulevard between South 19th Avenue and South 7th Avenue from 2018 to 2019, recorded at the same count stations referenced prior. However, the impact of this closure appears to have since normalized, as the overall effect is not seen when evaluating Sanderson Stewart’s collected data from 2015 to 2022. Because Grant Street is not anticipated to reopen, it is unlikely that any further traffic volume shifts will occur due to Grant Street rerouting. Minor traffic decreases from 2019 to 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic were observed in the MDT data on all segments, with the largest decreases observed on South 19th Avenue south of Kagy Boulevard and Kagy Boulevard between South 7th Avenue and South Willson Avenue. These segments, along with South Willson Avenue and South 3rd Avenue north and south of Kagy Boulevard, respectively, did not recover to meet 2019 AADTs by 2021. Future Traffic Projections The future traffic projections will be calculated by combining the Sanderson Stewart collected turning movement counts and ADTs with projected volumes for anticipated area developments. Site development data for the area subdivisions will be pulled from existing traffic impact studies or generated in a similar fashion. Detailed information for the future traffic projection methodology and outcomes will be provided in a supplement memorandum. 538 SPRING 2015 TRAFFIC COUNT DATA ATTACHMENT A 539 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 7:45 AM 7 57 97 0 161 105 112 15 0 232 2 4 3 0 9 82 7 36 0 125 527 8:00 AM 4 66 94 0 164 77 102 9 0 188 1 7 6 0 14 52 8 44 0 104 470 8:15 AM 4 74 89 0 167 69 81 6 0 156 2 6 9 0 17 63 4 22 0 89 429 8:30 AM 6 55 69 1 131 71 65 4 0 140 2 9 6 0 17 63 5 33 0 101 389 Grand Total 21 252 349 1 623 322 360 34 0 716 7 26 24 0 57 260 24 135 0 419 1815 Medium Truck % 9.5 3.2 2.0 0.0 2.7 0.9 0.6 2.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 7.7 4.2 0.0 5.3 0.4 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.2 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 Total Truck % 9.5 4.0 2.3 0.0 3.2 0.9 0.8 2.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 7.7 4.2 0.0 5.3 0.4 0.0 4.4 0.0 1.7 Total % 1.2 13.9 19.2 0.1 34.3 17.7 19.8 1.9 0.0 39.4 0.4 1.4 1.3 0.0 3.1 14.3 1.3 7.4 0.0 23.1 100.0 PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.86 RT TH LT U 21 252 349 1 260RT24TH135LT0UU0LT24TH26RT70 34 360 322 U LT TH RT Westbound Agency/Company: T. Mosdal Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: 19th Ave AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound 19th Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & 19th AveCounted By:Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd57City of Bozeman / MDTThursday, April 09, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson 19th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 19th Ave 623 In Out 645 19th Ave 716 InOut 394In79 In419Out697Total Entering 1815Out NNNNN 540 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 4:45 PM 5 83 77 0 165 53 63 3 0 119 7 3 19 0 29 120 3 68 0 191 504 5:00 PM 0 70 87 0 157 61 81 3 0 145 10 10 16 0 36 126 4 76 0 206 544 5:15 PM 1 81 68 0 150 57 62 0 0 119 4 4 9 0 17 115 8 75 0 198 484 5:30 PM 2 79 77 0 158 60 64 0 0 124 3 6 9 0 18 100 1 60 0 161 461 Grand Total 8 313 309 0 630 231 270 6 0 507 24 23 53 0 100 461 16 279 0 756 1993 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.6 6.1 0.0 3.3 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.4 Total Truck % 0.0 1.0 6.5 0.0 3.7 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.8 Total % 0.4 15.7 15.5 0.0 31.6 11.6 13.5 0.3 0.0 25.4 1.2 1.2 2.7 0.0 5.0 23.1 0.8 14.0 0.0 37.9 100.0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 RT TH LT U 8 313 309 0 461RT16TH279LT0UU0LT53TH23RT240 6 270 231 U LT TH RT Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: T. Mosdal Kagy Blvd & 19th Ave North/South Street: 19th Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Thursday, April 09, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson East/West Street:Kagy BlvdOut30Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 19th Ave 19th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In100563Out19th Ave In Out 630 784 19th Ave 756InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 1993 616 507 Out In NNNNN 541 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 7:45 AM 12 11 10 0 33 0 2 3 0 5 18 121 36 0 175 27 116 5 0 148 361 8:00 AM 16 7 23 0 46 3 3 2 0 8 14 84 29 0 127 33 84 9 0 126 307 8:15 AM 8 11 19 0 38 1 1 1 0 3 16 117 29 0 162 32 108 2 0 142 345 8:30 AM 15 12 22 0 49 2 7 1 0 10 18 90 27 0 135 27 95 7 0 129 323 Grand Total 51 41 74 0 166 6 13 7 0 26 66 412 121 0 599 119 403 23 0 545 1336 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.7 1.7 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 Total % 3.8 3.1 5.5 0.0 12.4 0.4 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.9 4.9 30.8 9.1 0.0 44.8 8.9 30.2 1.7 0.0 40.8 100.0 PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 RT TH LT U 51 41 74 0 119RT403TH23LT0UU0LT121TH412RT660 7 13 6 U LT TH RTIn461 In545Out492Total Entering 1336Out 11th Ave 26 InOut 130 11th Ave 166 In Out 253 Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd599City of Bozeman / MDTTuesday, April 07, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & 11th AveCounted By: Westbound Agency/Company: T. Mosdal Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: 11th Ave AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound 11th Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: NNNNN 542 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 4:45 PM 34 3 49 0 86 8 12 18 0 38 3 113 18 0 134 37 132 3 0 172 430 5:00 PM 39 3 60 0 102 16 12 34 0 62 3 142 25 0 170 39 127 0 0 166 500 5:15 PM 33 1 60 0 94 7 13 24 0 44 2 121 19 0 142 37 127 2 0 166 446 5:30 PM 33 1 51 0 85 3 6 11 0 20 2 111 21 0 134 35 99 0 0 134 373 Grand Total 139 8 220 0 367 34 43 87 0 164 10 487 83 0 580 148 485 5 0 638 1749 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total % 7.9 0.5 12.6 0.0 21.0 1.9 2.5 5.0 0.0 9.4 0.6 27.8 4.7 0.0 33.2 8.5 27.7 0.3 0.0 36.5 100.0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 RT TH LT U 139 8 220 0 148RT485TH5LT0UU0LT83TH487RT100 87 43 34 U LT TH RT 11th Ave 638InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 1749 23 164 Out In 11th Ave In Out 367 274 Kagy BlvdOut711Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 11th Ave 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In580741OutNorth/South Street: 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson East/West Street: Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: T. Mosdal Kagy Blvd & 11th Ave NNNNN 543 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0014 3414 34 48 0.2% 0.5% 0.3%1:0012 812 8 20 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%2:0011 1011 10 21 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%3:002 42 4 6 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%4:009 149 14 23 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0036 6536 65 101 0.5% 0.9% 0.7%6:00144 138144 138 282 2.0% 1.9% 2.0%7:00437 420437 420 857 6.1% 5.9% 6.0%8:00477 520477 520 997 6.6% 7.3% 7.0%9:00430 373430 373 803 6.0% 5.3% 5.6%10:00373 393373 393 766 5.2% 5.6% 5.4%11:00445 403445 403 848 6.2% 5.7% 5.9%12:00528 482528 482 1010 7.3% 6.8% 7.1%13:00478 540478 540 1018 6.6% 7.6% 7.1%14:00442 482442 482 924 6.1% 6.8% 6.5%15:00599 561599 561 1160 8.3% 7.9% 8.1%16:00587 657587 657 1244 8.1% 9.3% 8.7%17:00741 620741 620 1361 10.3% 8.8% 9.5%18:00574 442574 442 1016 7.9% 6.2% 7.1%19:00324 349324 349 673 4.5% 4.9% 4.7%20:00257 291257 291 548 3.6% 4.1% 3.8%21:00177 139177 139 316 2.5% 2.0% 2.2%22:0087 8087 80 167 1.2% 1.1% 1.2%23:0039 5239 52 91 0.5% 0.7% 0.6%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 7,223 7,077 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,223 7,077 14,300 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:4/6/20154/5/20154/8/2015Wednesday4/7/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - east of 11th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42101Annual Average Daily Traffic4/9/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday4/10/2015 4/11/2015Friday Saturday02004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour544 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0015 2915 29 44 0.2% 0.4% 0.3%1:0011 911 9 20 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%2:009 89 8 17 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%3:002 52 5 7 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%4:0013 1513 15 28 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%5:0037 5637 56 93 0.6% 0.8% 0.7%6:00150 107150 107 257 2.3% 1.6% 1.9%7:00523 347523 347 870 8.0% 5.2% 6.6%8:00557 445557 445 1002 8.6% 6.6% 7.6%9:00477 350477 350 827 7.3% 5.2% 6.3%10:00381 374381 374 755 5.8% 5.6% 5.7%11:00437 401437 401 838 6.7% 6.0% 6.3%12:00471 484471 484 955 7.2% 7.2% 7.2%13:00412 372412 372 784 6.3% 5.5% 5.9%14:00388 464388 464 852 6.0% 6.9% 6.4%15:00474 554474 554 1028 7.3% 8.3% 7.8%16:00477 698477 698 1175 7.3% 10.4% 8.9%17:00576 673576 673 1249 8.8% 10.0% 9.4%18:00436 429436 429 865 6.7% 6.4% 6.5%19:00252 344252 344 596 3.9% 5.1% 4.5%20:00185 281185 281 466 2.8% 4.2% 3.5%21:00125 133125 133 258 1.9% 2.0% 2.0%22:0071 7971 79 150 1.1% 1.2% 1.1%23:0035 4735 47 82 0.5% 0.7% 0.6%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6,514 6,704 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,514 6,704 13,218 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:4/6/20154/5/20154/8/2015Wednesday4/7/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - west of 11th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42101Annual Average Daily Traffic4/9/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday4/10/2015 4/11/2015Friday Saturday0200400600800100012001400Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour545 0.96HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:0012 612 6 18 0.4% 0.2% 0.3%1:004 54 5 9 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%2:002 22 2 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%3:000 10 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4:005 15 1 6 0.2% 0.0% 0.1%5:0017 617 6 23 0.6% 0.2% 0.4%6:0038 2138 21 59 1.3% 0.6% 0.9%7:00180 110180 110 290 6.1% 3.3% 4.6%8:00239 166239 166 405 8.1% 5.0% 6.5%9:00180 157180 157 337 6.1% 4.7% 5.4%10:00171 154171 154 325 5.8% 4.6% 5.2%11:00166 159166 159 325 5.7% 4.8% 5.2%12:00221 273221 273 494 7.5% 8.2% 7.9%13:00198 286198 286 484 6.8% 8.6% 7.7%14:00192 238192 238 430 6.5% 7.1% 6.8%15:00234 307234 307 541 8.0% 9.2% 8.6%16:00255 289255 289 544 8.7% 8.6% 8.7%17:00267 361267 361 628 9.1% 10.8% 10.0%18:00198 281198 281 479 6.8% 8.4% 7.6%19:00160 212160 212 372 5.5% 6.3% 5.9%20:00103 160103 160 263 3.5% 4.8% 4.2%21:0052 9952 99 151 1.8% 3.0% 2.4%22:0024 3624 36 60 0.8% 1.1% 1.0%23:0015 1515 15 30 0.5% 0.4% 0.5%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 2,933 3,345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,933 3,345 6,278 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:4/6/20154/5/20154/8/2015Wednesday4/7/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:11th Avenue - north of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42101Annual Average Daily Traffic4/9/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday4/10/2015 4/11/2015Friday Saturday0100200300400500600700Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour546 1.00HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:001 11 1 2 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%1:001 01 0 1 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%2:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%3:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%5:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%6:001 221 22 23 0.1% 3.2% 1.5%7:0011 10511 105 116 1.4% 15.2% 7.7%8:0034 11934 119 153 4.2% 17.3% 10.2%9:0027 7627 76 103 3.3% 11.0% 6.9%10:0030 3930 39 69 3.7% 5.7% 4.6%11:0062 4862 48 110 7.7% 7.0% 7.3%12:0084 7784 77 161 10.4% 11.2% 10.8%13:0059 5759 57 116 7.3% 8.3% 7.7%14:0036 4736 47 83 4.5% 6.8% 5.5%15:0079 3279 32 111 9.8% 4.6% 7.4%16:00145 23145 23 168 17.9% 3.3% 11.2%17:00149 20149 20 169 18.4% 2.9% 11.3%18:0055 1155 11 66 6.8% 1.6% 4.4%19:0022 722 7 29 2.7% 1.0% 1.9%20:008 38 3 11 1.0% 0.4% 0.7%21:000 10 1 1 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%22:003 03 0 3 0.4% 0.0% 0.2%23:001 11 1 2 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 808 689 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 808 689 1,497 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday4/10/2015 4/11/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday4/8/2015Wednesday4/7/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:11th Avenue - south of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42101Annual Average Daily Traffic4/9/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTLocal StreetStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:4/6/20154/5/2015020406080100120140160180Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour547 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 7:45 AM 8 0 0 0 8 3 2 0 0 5 4 106 36 0 146 37 182 9 0 228 387 8:00 AM 5 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 7 96 17 0 120 12 169 6 0 187 314 8:15 AM 8 1 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 3 0 111 21 0 132 13 150 8 0 171 315 8:30 AM 12 1 1 0 14 0 2 0 0 2 6 107 25 0 138 11 157 6 0 174 328 Grand Total 33 2 1 0 36 3 9 0 0 12 17 420 99 0 536 73 658 29 0 760 1344 Medium Truck % 6.1 50.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 2.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Truck % 6.1 50.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 2.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 Total % 2.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.7 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.3 31.3 7.4 0.0 39.9 5.4 49.0 2.2 0.0 56.5 100.0 PHF 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.87 RT TH LT U 33 2 1 0 73RT658TH29LT0UU0LT99TH420RT170 0 9 3 U LT TH RT Westbound Agency/Company: T. Mosdal Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: 7th Ave AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound 7th Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & 7th AveCounted By:Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd536City of Bozeman / MDTThursday, April 02, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson 7th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 7th Ave 36 In Out 181 7th Ave 12 InOut 48In691 In760Out424Total Entering 1344Out NNNNN 548 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 4:45 PM 25 3 5 0 33 2 0 2 0 4 1 154 12 0 167 12 148 1 0 161 365 5:00 PM 21 0 6 0 27 10 0 3 0 13 0 196 5 0 201 4 158 0 0 162 403 5:15 PM 15 0 7 0 22 5 1 0 0 6 2 183 6 0 191 7 168 1 0 176 395 5:30 PM 10 1 4 0 15 10 1 0 0 11 0 208 19 0 227 4 152 0 0 156 409 Grand Total 71 4 22 0 97 27 2 5 0 34 3 741 42 0 786 27 626 2 0 655 1572 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 7.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 7.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total % 4.5 0.3 1.4 0.0 6.2 1.7 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.2 0.2 47.1 2.7 0.0 50.0 1.7 39.8 0.1 0.0 41.7 100.0 PHF 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.96 RT TH LT U 71 4 22 0 27RT626TH2LT0UU0LT42TH741RT30 5 2 27 U LT TH RT Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: T. Mosdal Kagy Blvd & 7th Ave North/South Street: 7th Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Thursday, April 02, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson East/West Street:Kagy BlvdOut702Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 7th Ave 7th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In786790Out7th Ave In Out 97 71 7th Ave 655InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 1572 9 34 Out In NNNNN 549 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0026 2526 25 51 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%1:0010 1210 12 22 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%2:0010 1210 12 22 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%3:004 74 7 11 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:006 126 12 18 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%5:0025 7325 73 98 0.3% 1.0% 0.7%6:00129 152129 152 281 1.7% 2.0% 1.9%7:00328 583328 583 911 4.3% 7.8% 6.0%8:00406 687406 687 1093 5.4% 9.2% 7.3%9:00384 445384 445 829 5.1% 5.9% 5.5%10:00417 437417 437 854 5.5% 5.8% 5.7%11:00477 480477 480 957 6.3% 6.4% 6.3%12:00562 506562 506 1068 7.4% 6.7% 7.1%13:00589 516589 516 1105 7.8% 6.9% 7.3%14:00502 484502 484 986 6.6% 6.4% 6.5%15:00635 554635 554 1189 8.4% 7.4% 7.9%16:00645 622645 622 1267 8.5% 8.3% 8.4%17:00786 625786 625 1411 10.4% 8.3% 9.4%18:00588 426588 426 1014 7.8% 5.7% 6.7%19:00367 320367 320 687 4.8% 4.3% 4.6%20:00318 226318 226 544 4.2% 3.0% 3.6%21:00206 163206 163 369 2.7% 2.2% 2.4%22:00104 88104 88 192 1.4% 1.2% 1.3%23:0044 5044 50 94 0.6% 0.7% 0.6%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,568 7,505 0 0 0 0 7,568 7,505 15,073 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday4/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - east of 7th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42096Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/201502004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour550 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0025 3925 39 64 0.3% 0.5% 0.4%1:0010 1410 14 24 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%2:0010 1310 13 23 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%3:004 74 7 11 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%4:007 127 12 19 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%5:0037 7437 74 111 0.5% 0.9% 0.7%6:00163 142163 142 305 2.0% 1.8% 1.9%7:00456 481456 481 937 5.7% 6.1% 5.9%8:00507 653507 653 1160 6.3% 8.3% 7.3%9:00430 449430 449 879 5.4% 5.7% 5.5%10:00462 455462 455 917 5.8% 5.8% 5.8%11:00487 511487 511 998 6.1% 6.5% 6.3%12:00589 541589 541 1130 7.3% 6.9% 7.1%13:00617 582617 582 1199 7.7% 7.4% 7.6%14:00527 520527 520 1047 6.6% 6.6% 6.6%15:00650 624650 624 1274 8.1% 8.0% 8.0%16:00636 696636 696 1332 7.9% 8.9% 8.4%17:00783 671783 671 1454 9.8% 8.6% 9.2%18:00574 476574 476 1050 7.2% 6.1% 6.6%19:00373 339373 339 712 4.7% 4.3% 4.5%20:00317 232317 232 549 4.0% 3.0% 3.5%21:00212 169212 169 381 2.6% 2.2% 2.4%22:00101 86101 86 187 1.3% 1.1% 1.2%23:0043 5543 55 98 0.5% 0.7% 0.6%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,020 7,841 0 0 0 0 8,020 7,841 15,861 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday4/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - west of 7th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42096Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/201502004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour551 0.96HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:005 185 18 23 0.4% 1.4% 0.9%1:002 52 5 7 0.1% 0.4% 0.3%2:001 31 3 4 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%3:001 11 1 2 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:002 02 0 2 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%5:0016 416 4 20 1.2% 0.3% 0.8%6:0049 1249 12 61 3.6% 1.0% 2.3%7:00231 23231 23 254 16.8% 1.8% 9.7%8:00148 40148 40 188 10.8% 3.2% 7.1%9:00108 71108 71 179 7.9% 5.6% 6.8%10:00107 86107 86 193 7.8% 6.8% 7.3%11:0094 9494 94 188 6.9% 7.5% 7.1%12:0099 11299 112 211 7.2% 8.9% 8.0%13:0085 14785 147 232 6.2% 11.7% 8.8%14:00101 104101 104 205 7.4% 8.3% 7.8%15:0079 13279 132 211 5.8% 10.5% 8.0%16:0065 14265 142 207 4.7% 11.3% 7.9%17:0067 8467 84 151 4.9% 6.7% 5.7%18:0032 8732 87 119 2.3% 6.9% 4.5%19:0024 3224 32 56 1.7% 2.5% 2.1%20:0022 2722 27 49 1.6% 2.1% 1.9%21:0020 1620 16 36 1.5% 1.3% 1.4%22:0012 1212 12 24 0.9% 1.0% 0.9%23:002 72 7 9 0.1% 0.6% 0.3%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,372 1,259 0 0 0 0 1,372 1,259 2,631 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday4/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:7th Avenue - north of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42096Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMajor CollectorStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/2015050100150200250300Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour552 1.00HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:002 02 0 2 0.8% 0.0% 0.4%1:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%3:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%5:001 01 0 1 0.4% 0.0% 0.2%6:001 81 8 9 0.4% 3.2% 1.8%7:008 308 30 38 3.3% 12.1% 7.7%8:0013 4213 42 55 5.3% 16.9% 11.2%9:0020 2620 26 46 8.2% 10.5% 9.3%10:0014 2114 21 35 5.7% 8.5% 7.1%11:0029 729 7 36 11.8% 2.8% 7.3%12:0016 2216 22 38 6.5% 8.9% 7.7%13:009 339 33 42 3.7% 13.3% 8.5%14:0028 1928 19 47 11.4% 7.7% 9.5%15:0018 1618 16 34 7.3% 6.5% 6.9%16:0020 1420 14 34 8.2% 5.6% 6.9%17:0038 438 4 42 15.5% 1.6% 8.5%18:0012 412 4 16 4.9% 1.6% 3.2%19:005 05 0 5 2.0% 0.0% 1.0%20:004 14 1 5 1.6% 0.4% 1.0%21:004 04 0 4 1.6% 0.0% 0.8%22:002 12 1 3 0.8% 0.4% 0.6%23:001 01 0 1 0.4% 0.0% 0.2%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 245 248 0 0 0 0 245 248 493 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTLocal StreetStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/20154/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:7th Avenue - south of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42096Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday Saturday0102030405060Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour553 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 7:45 AM 17 33 17 0 67 28 81 67 0 176 18 71 21 0 110 32 137 24 0 193 546 8:00 AM 19 33 25 0 77 21 115 88 0 224 28 71 22 0 121 46 102 37 0 185 607 8:15 AM 18 27 16 0 61 37 87 80 0 204 24 67 20 0 111 46 92 17 0 155 531 8:30 AM 19 24 22 0 65 21 48 55 0 124 24 74 22 0 120 28 74 12 0 114 423 Grand Total 73 117 80 0 270 107 331 290 0 728 94 283 85 0 462 152 405 90 0 647 2107 Medium Truck % 0.0 3.4 3.8 0.0 2.6 0.9 2.1 1.4 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.9 1.3 1.2 3.3 0.0 1.5 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck % 0.0 3.4 3.8 0.0 2.6 0.9 2.1 1.4 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.9 1.3 1.2 3.3 0.0 1.5 Total % 3.5 5.6 3.8 0.0 12.8 5.1 15.7 13.8 0.0 34.6 4.5 13.4 4.0 0.0 21.9 7.2 19.2 4.3 0.0 30.7 100.0 PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 RT TH LT U 73 117 80 0 152RT405TH90LT0UU0LT85TH283RT940 290 331 107 U LT TH RTIn768 In647Out470Total Entering 2107Out S 3rd Ave 728 InOut 301 Willson Ave 270 In Out 568 Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd462City of Bozeman / MDTTuesday, March 31, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson Willson Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & Willson Ave/S 3rd AveCounted By: Westbound Agency/Company: T. Mosdal Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound S 3rd Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: NNNNN 554 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 4:45 PM 18 46 38 0 102 13 48 36 0 97 56 90 30 0 176 28 73 22 0 123 498 5:00 PM 22 61 32 0 115 22 42 40 0 104 54 121 40 0 215 26 108 28 0 162 596 5:15 PM 21 72 39 0 132 13 36 38 0 87 83 113 32 0 228 32 90 36 1 159 606 5:30 PM 16 49 32 0 97 21 36 41 0 98 66 94 34 0 194 29 93 36 0 158 547 Grand Total 77 228 141 0 446 69 162 155 0 386 259 418 136 0 813 115 364 122 1 602 2247 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.4 3.5 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck % 0.0 0.4 3.5 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total % 3.4 10.1 6.3 0.0 19.8 3.1 7.2 6.9 0.0 17.2 11.5 18.6 6.1 0.0 36.2 5.1 16.2 5.4 0.0 26.8 100.0 PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 RT TH LT U 77 228 141 0 115RT364TH122LT1UU0LT136TH418RT2590 155 162 69 U LT TH RT S 3rd Ave 602InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 2247 609 386 Out In Willson Ave In Out 446 413 Kagy BlvdOut596Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Willson Ave S 3rd Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In813629OutNorth/South Street: Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson East/West Street: Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: T. Mosdal Kagy Blvd & Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave NNNNN 555 0.98HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0012 1812 18 30 0.2% 0.3% 0.2%1:008 98 9 17 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%2:004 34 3 7 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%3:003 13 1 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4:008 148 14 22 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0019 4719 47 66 0.3% 0.7% 0.5%6:00160 120160 120 280 2.6% 1.9% 2.2%7:00342 512342 512 854 5.5% 8.0% 6.7%8:00456 602456 602 1058 7.3% 9.4% 8.3%9:00333 378333 378 711 5.3% 5.9% 5.6%10:00376 371376 371 747 6.0% 5.8% 5.9%11:00357 375357 375 732 5.7% 5.8% 5.8%12:00428 394428 394 822 6.8% 6.1% 6.5%13:00451 418451 418 869 7.2% 6.5% 6.9%14:00385 365385 365 750 6.2% 5.7% 5.9%15:00543 538543 538 1081 8.7% 8.4% 8.5%16:00556 519556 519 1075 8.9% 8.1% 8.5%17:00615 612615 612 1227 9.8% 9.5% 9.7%18:00402 446402 446 848 6.4% 6.9% 6.7%19:00314 283314 283 597 5.0% 4.4% 4.7%20:00232 169232 169 401 3.7% 2.6% 3.2%21:00153 123153 123 276 2.4% 1.9% 2.2%22:0065 7865 78 143 1.0% 1.2% 1.1%23:0027 2727 27 54 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6,249 6,422 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,249 6,422 12,671 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/20154/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - east of Willson AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42094Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday Saturday0200400600800100012001400Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour556 0.98HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0016 2016 20 36 0.2% 0.3% 0.2%1:0013 913 9 22 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%2:008 68 6 14 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%3:003 13 1 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4:0010 1710 17 27 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0018 8018 80 98 0.2% 1.1% 0.7%6:00137 179137 179 316 1.8% 2.5% 2.1%7:00324 613324 613 937 4.3% 8.4% 6.4%8:00455 737455 737 1192 6.1% 10.2% 8.1%9:00363 446363 446 809 4.9% 6.1% 5.5%10:00428 410428 410 838 5.7% 5.6% 5.7%11:00422 419422 419 841 5.7% 5.8% 5.7%12:00541 454541 454 995 7.3% 6.3% 6.8%13:00534 493534 493 1027 7.2% 6.8% 7.0%14:00466 407466 407 873 6.3% 5.6% 5.9%15:00656 525656 525 1181 8.8% 7.2% 8.0%16:00648 546648 546 1194 8.7% 7.5% 8.1%17:00796 604796 604 1400 10.7% 8.3% 9.5%18:00524 513524 513 1037 7.0% 7.1% 7.1%19:00403 337403 337 740 5.4% 4.6% 5.0%20:00345 194345 194 539 4.6% 2.7% 3.7%21:00186 123186 123 309 2.5% 1.7% 2.1%22:00113 86113 86 199 1.5% 1.2% 1.4%23:0041 3841 38 79 0.6% 0.5% 0.5%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 7,450 7,257 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,450 7,257 14,707 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/20154/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - west of Willson AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42094Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday Saturday02004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour557 0.98HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:009 209 20 29 0.2% 0.5% 0.3%1:009 59 5 14 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%2:003 53 5 8 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%3:001 11 1 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4:009 29 2 11 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%5:0033 1433 14 47 0.7% 0.4% 0.5%6:0086 5486 54 140 1.8% 1.4% 1.6%7:00364 179364 179 543 7.7% 4.6% 6.3%8:00505 263505 263 768 10.7% 6.7% 8.9%9:00286 171286 171 457 6.0% 4.4% 5.3%10:00275 181275 181 456 5.8% 4.6% 5.3%11:00299 227299 227 526 6.3% 5.8% 6.1%12:00340 274340 274 614 7.2% 7.0% 7.1%13:00329 277329 277 606 6.9% 7.1% 7.0%14:00280 255280 255 535 5.9% 6.5% 6.2%15:00417 353417 353 770 8.8% 9.0% 8.9%16:00383 353383 353 736 8.1% 9.0% 8.5%17:00401 432401 432 833 8.5% 11.0% 9.6%18:00253 314253 314 567 5.3% 8.0% 6.6%19:00157 215157 215 372 3.3% 5.5% 4.3%20:00141 134141 134 275 3.0% 3.4% 3.2%21:0080 10880 108 188 1.7% 2.8% 2.2%22:0056 6256 62 118 1.2% 1.6% 1.4%23:0018 2018 20 38 0.4% 0.5% 0.4%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 4,734 3,919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,734 3,919 8,653 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday4/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Willson Avenue - north of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42094Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/20150100200300400500600700800900Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour558 0.98HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:004 174 17 21 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%1:006 76 7 13 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%2:004 74 7 11 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%3:001 11 1 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4:0013 513 5 18 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%5:0061 761 7 68 1.2% 0.1% 0.7%6:00156 41156 41 197 3.0% 0.9% 2.0%7:00494 191494 191 685 9.5% 4.0% 6.9%8:00657 278657 278 935 12.6% 5.8% 9.4%9:00322 169322 169 491 6.2% 3.6% 4.9%10:00282 202282 202 484 5.4% 4.2% 4.9%11:00311 261311 261 572 6.0% 5.5% 5.7%12:00318 305318 305 623 6.1% 6.4% 6.2%13:00314 270314 270 584 6.0% 5.7% 5.9%14:00279 293279 293 572 5.4% 6.2% 5.7%15:00433 494433 494 927 8.3% 10.4% 9.3%16:00398 433398 433 831 7.6% 9.1% 8.3%17:00385 605385 605 990 7.4% 12.7% 9.9%18:00305 421305 421 726 5.9% 8.8% 7.3%19:00203 296203 296 499 3.9% 6.2% 5.0%20:00141 221141 221 362 2.7% 4.6% 3.6%21:0072 13272 132 204 1.4% 2.8% 2.0%22:0035 8135 81 116 0.7% 1.7% 1.2%23:0018 2318 23 41 0.3% 0.5% 0.4%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 5,212 4,760 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,212 4,760 9,972 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday4/3/2015 4/4/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday4/1/2015Wednesday3/31/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:South 3rd Avenue - south of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:T. MosdalSanderson Stewart42094Annual Average Daily Traffic4/2/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMajor CollectorStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:3/30/20153/29/2015020040060080010001200Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour559 ATTACHMENT B FALL 2015 TRAFFIC COUNT DATA 560 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0 7:45 AM 12 31 11 0 54 0 29 2 0 31 15 142 54 0 211 23 141 6 0 170 466 8:00 AM 10 26 25 0 61 0 8 2 0 10 21 109 18 0 148 33 125 10 0 168 387 8:15 AM 12 8 16 0 36 1 8 3 0 12 26 135 23 0 184 23 119 13 0 155 387 8:30 AM 15 14 13 0 42 3 26 1 0 30 14 130 51 0 195 17 130 3 0 150 417 Grand Total 49 79 65 0 193 4 71 8 0 83 76 516 146 0 738 96 515 32 0 643 1657 Medium Truck % 0.0 2.5 4.6 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 3.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.4 Heavy Truck % 2.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Truck % 2.0 2.5 6.2 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 3.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total % 3.0 4.8 3.9 0.0 11.6 0.2 4.3 0.5 0.0 5.0 4.6 31.1 8.8 0.0 44.5 5.8 31.1 1.9 0.0 38.8 100.0 PHF 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 RT TH LT U 49 79 65 0 96RT515TH32LT0UU0LT146TH516RT760 8 71 4 U LT TH RTIn572 In643Out585Total Entering 1657Out 11th Ave 83 InOut 187 11th Ave 193 In Out 313 Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd738City of Bozeman / MDTWednesday, September 23, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall City Counts 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & 11th AveCounted By: Westbound Agency/Company: J. Staszcuk Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: 11th Ave AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound 11th Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: NNNNN 561 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0 4:45 PM 32 7 41 0 80 9 13 17 0 39 6 148 33 0 187 35 121 2 0 158 464 5:00 PM 60 18 41 0 119 14 27 26 0 67 3 167 30 0 200 32 134 3 0 169 555 5:15 PM 52 11 67 0 130 5 10 19 0 34 7 157 27 0 191 33 147 3 0 183 538 5:30 PM 50 11 54 0 115 11 16 18 0 45 5 157 16 0 178 33 138 7 0 178 516 Grand Total 194 47 203 0 444 39 66 80 0 185 21 629 106 0 756 133 540 15 0 688 2073 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 Total % 9.4 2.3 9.8 0.0 21.4 1.9 3.2 3.9 0.0 8.9 1.0 30.3 5.1 0.0 36.5 6.4 26.0 0.7 0.0 33.2 100.0 PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 RT TH LT U 194 47 203 0 133RT540TH15LT0UU0LT106TH629RT210 80 66 39 U LT TH RT 11th Ave 688InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 2073 83 185 Out In 11th Ave In Out 444 305 Kagy BlvdOut814Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 11th Ave 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In756871OutNorth/South Street: 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (4:45 - 5:45 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall City Counts East/West Street: Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: J. Staszcuk Kagy Blvd & 11th Ave NNNNN 562 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 7:30 AM 1 45 91 0 137 86 60 4 0 150 1 0 2 0 3 50 4 30 0 84 374 7:45 AM 5 71 104 0 180 86 100 6 0 192 2 0 4 0 6 72 3 36 0 111 489 8:00 AM 4 48 81 0 133 56 73 9 0 138 1 6 3 0 10 51 3 38 0 92 373 8:15 AM 0 60 71 0 131 58 71 5 0 134 0 4 4 0 8 79 6 42 0 127 400 Grand Total 10 224 347 0 581 286 304 24 0 614 4 10 13 0 27 252 16 146 0 414 1636 Medium Truck % 0.0 2.7 1.2 0.0 1.7 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 Total Truck % 0.0 2.7 1.7 0.0 2.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.7 Total % 0.6 13.7 21.2 0.0 35.5 17.5 18.6 1.5 0.0 37.5 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.7 15.4 1.0 8.9 0.0 25.3 100.0 PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.84 RT TH LT U 10 224 347 0 252RT16TH146LT0UU0LT13TH10RT40 24 304 286 U LT TH RTIn50 In414Out643Total Entering 1636Out 19th Ave 614 InOut 374 19th Ave 581 In Out 569 Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd27City of Bozeman / MDTThursday, October 15, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts 19th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & 19th AveCounted By: Westbound Agency/Company: J. Staszcuk Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: 19th Ave AM Peak Hour (7:30 - 8:30 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound 19th Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: NNNNN 563 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 5:00 PM 5 95 97 0 197 60 96 2 0 158 12 7 21 0 40 144 5 70 0 219 614 5:15 PM 0 101 107 0 208 53 84 1 0 138 5 10 16 0 31 124 3 80 0 207 584 5:30 PM 0 79 75 0 154 58 59 1 0 118 2 7 8 0 17 92 6 80 0 178 467 5:45 PM 1 113 87 0 201 52 71 1 0 124 2 6 10 0 18 120 5 58 0 183 526 Grand Total 6 388 366 0 760 223 310 5 0 538 21 30 55 0 106 480 19 288 0 787 2191 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.4 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.5 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 Total Truck % 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.8 Total % 0.3 17.7 16.7 0.0 34.7 10.2 14.1 0.2 0.0 24.6 1.0 1.4 2.5 0.0 4.8 21.9 0.9 13.1 0.0 35.9 100.0 PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 RT TH LT U 6 388 366 0 480RT19TH288LT0UU0LT55TH30RT210 5 310 223 U LT TH RT 19th Ave 787InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 2191 697 538 Out In 19th Ave In Out 760 845 Kagy BlvdOut30Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 19th Ave 19th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In106619OutNorth/South Street: 19th Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Thursday, October 15, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts East/West Street: Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: J. Staszcuk Kagy Blvd & 19th Ave NNNNN 564 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0034 5134 51 85 0.5% 0.7% 0.6%1:009 289 28 37 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%2:0012 1012 10 22 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%3:008 98 9 17 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:0010 1710 17 27 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0042 6042 60 102 0.6% 0.8% 0.7%6:00196 126196 126 322 2.6% 1.7% 2.2%7:00573 298573 298 871 7.7% 4.0% 5.8%8:00602 415602 415 1017 8.1% 5.5% 6.8%9:00549 394549 394 943 7.4% 5.2% 6.3%10:00516 447516 447 963 7.0% 5.9% 6.4%11:00460 476460 476 936 6.2% 6.3% 6.3%12:00532 633532 633 1165 7.2% 8.4% 7.8%13:00549 553549 553 1102 7.4% 7.3% 7.4%14:00470 520470 520 990 6.3% 6.9% 6.6%15:00461 617461 617 1078 6.2% 8.2% 7.2%16:00525 653525 653 1178 7.1% 8.7% 7.9%17:00617 785617 785 1402 8.3% 10.4% 9.4%18:00447 502447 502 949 6.0% 6.7% 6.3%19:00274 328274 328 602 3.7% 4.4% 4.0%20:00201 258201 258 459 2.7% 3.4% 3.1%21:00166 175166 175 341 2.2% 2.3% 2.3%22:00117 106117 106 223 1.6% 1.4% 1.5%23:0048 6648 66 114 0.6% 0.9% 0.8%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,418 7,527 0 0 0 0 7,418 7,527 14,945 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday10/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - east of 19th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201502004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour565 1.00HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:001 21 2 3 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%1:001 31 3 4 0.1% 0.6% 0.3%2:001 11 1 2 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%3:000 10 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%4:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%5:001 11 1 2 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%6:004 64 6 10 0.5% 1.1% 0.7%7:0013 3513 35 48 1.6% 6.4% 3.5%8:0044 5744 57 101 5.4% 10.5% 7.4%9:0052 4452 44 96 6.3% 8.1% 7.0%10:0040 3240 32 72 4.9% 5.9% 5.3%11:0086 4086 40 126 10.5% 7.3% 9.2%12:0091 4191 41 132 11.1% 7.5% 9.7%13:0069 5869 58 127 8.4% 10.6% 9.3%14:0062 4862 48 110 7.6% 8.8% 8.1%15:0081 4681 46 127 9.9% 8.4% 9.3%16:0096 4696 46 142 11.7% 8.4% 10.4%17:00106 30106 30 136 12.9% 5.5% 10.0%18:0034 2634 26 60 4.1% 4.8% 4.4%19:0012 1312 13 25 1.5% 2.4% 1.8%20:0011 511 5 16 1.3% 0.9% 1.2%21:0012 712 7 19 1.5% 1.3% 1.4%22:004 24 2 6 0.5% 0.4% 0.4%23:000 10 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 821 545 0 0 0 0 821 545 1,366 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday10/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - west of 19th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTLocal StreetStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/2015020406080100120140160Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour566 0.96HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:0056 5456 54 110 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%1:0023 1323 13 36 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%2:0015 1615 16 31 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%3:0011 911 9 20 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:0034 1134 11 45 0.4% 0.1% 0.2%5:0089 3489 34 123 1.0% 0.4% 0.7%6:00191 170191 170 361 2.1% 1.9% 2.0%7:00437 493437 493 930 4.7% 5.5% 5.1%8:00568 581568 581 1149 6.1% 6.5% 6.3%9:00557 574557 574 1131 6.0% 6.4% 6.2%10:00581 576581 576 1157 6.3% 6.5% 6.4%11:00670 541670 541 1211 7.2% 6.1% 6.7%12:00798 646798 646 1444 8.6% 7.3% 7.9%13:00644 704644 704 1348 6.9% 7.9% 7.4%14:00648 639648 639 1287 7.0% 7.2% 7.1%15:00736 600736 600 1336 7.9% 6.7% 7.3%16:00730 672730 672 1402 7.9% 7.5% 7.7%17:00842 759842 759 1601 9.1% 8.5% 8.8%18:00600 617600 617 1217 6.5% 6.9% 6.7%19:00362 390362 390 752 3.9% 4.4% 4.1%20:00274 328274 328 602 3.0% 3.7% 3.3%21:00220 247220 247 467 2.4% 2.8% 2.6%22:00128 164128 164 292 1.4% 1.8% 1.6%23:0069 7069 70 139 0.7% 0.8% 0.8%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,283 8,908 0 0 0 0 9,283 8,908 18,191 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday10/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:19th Avenue - north of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/2015020040060080010001200140016001800Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour567 0.96HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:0022 3622 36 58 0.3% 0.6% 0.5%1:003 113 11 14 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%2:0014 1214 12 26 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%3:006 46 4 10 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:0019 419 4 23 0.3% 0.1% 0.2%5:0059 2159 21 80 0.9% 0.3% 0.6%6:00170 77170 77 247 2.7% 1.2% 1.9%7:00519 279519 279 798 8.1% 4.4% 6.3%8:00559 372559 372 931 8.8% 5.8% 7.3%9:00437 306437 306 743 6.9% 4.8% 5.8%10:00388 322388 322 710 6.1% 5.1% 5.6%11:00437 369437 369 806 6.9% 5.8% 6.3%12:00506 503506 503 1009 7.9% 7.9% 7.9%13:00411 485411 485 896 6.4% 7.6% 7.0%14:00366 420366 420 786 5.7% 6.6% 6.2%15:00402 456402 456 858 6.3% 7.2% 6.7%16:00419 537419 537 956 6.6% 8.4% 7.5%17:00537 695537 695 1232 8.4% 10.9% 9.7%18:00437 516437 516 953 6.9% 8.1% 7.5%19:00258 340258 340 598 4.0% 5.3% 4.7%20:00162 280162 280 442 2.5% 4.4% 3.5%21:00146 186146 186 332 2.3% 2.9% 2.6%22:0072 9972 99 171 1.1% 1.6% 1.3%23:0028 4628 46 74 0.4% 0.7% 0.6%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,377 6,376 0 0 0 0 6,377 6,376 12,753 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201510/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:19th Avenue - south of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday Saturday0200400600800100012001400Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour568 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 7:30 AM 7 7 7 0 21 2 10 2 0 14 9 126 29 0 164 24 95 4 0 123 322 7:45 AM 12 14 17 0 43 5 20 3 0 28 9 115 33 0 157 24 111 10 0 145 373 8:00 AM 7 8 14 0 29 1 4 3 0 8 23 82 27 0 132 16 87 5 0 108 277 8:15 AM 9 7 13 0 29 3 12 3 0 18 4 103 13 0 120 18 114 3 0 135 302 Grand Total 35 36 51 0 122 11 46 11 0 68 45 426 102 0 573 82 407 22 0 511 1274 Medium Truck % 2.9 2.8 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.2 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.7 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 Heavy Truck % 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Truck % 8.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.2 0.5 2.9 0.0 1.0 2.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total % 2.7 2.8 4.0 0.0 9.6 0.9 3.6 0.9 0.0 5.3 3.5 33.4 8.0 0.0 45.0 6.4 31.9 1.7 0.0 40.1 100.0 PHF 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.85 RT TH LT U 35 36 51 0 82RT407TH22LT0UU0LT102TH426RT450 11 46 11 U LT TH RT Westbound Agency/Company: J. Staszcuk Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: 11th Ave AM Peak Hour (7:30 - 8:30 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound 11th Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & 11th AveCounted By:Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd573City of Bozeman / MDTThursday, October 15, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 11th Ave 122 In Out 230 11th Ave 68 InOut 103In453 In511Out488Total Entering 1274Out NNNNN 569 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 5:00 PM 35 10 46 0 91 10 17 33 0 60 7 135 27 0 169 25 127 0 0 152 472 5:15 PM 30 10 58 0 98 6 17 28 0 51 3 129 24 0 156 31 135 5 0 171 476 5:30 PM 26 12 44 0 82 8 20 20 0 48 5 126 22 0 153 25 127 2 0 154 437 5:45 PM 34 12 60 0 106 7 23 12 0 42 1 117 15 0 133 39 126 3 0 168 449 Grand Total 125 44 208 0 377 31 77 93 0 201 16 507 88 0 611 120 515 10 0 645 1834 Medium Truck % 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Truck % 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total % 6.8 2.4 11.3 0.0 20.6 1.7 4.2 5.1 0.0 11.0 0.9 27.6 4.8 0.0 33.3 6.5 28.1 0.5 0.0 35.2 100.0 PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.96 RT TH LT U 125 44 208 0 120RT515TH10LT0UU0LT88TH507RT160 93 77 31 U LT TH RT Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: J. Staszcuk Kagy Blvd & 11th Ave North/South Street: 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Thursday, October 15, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts East/West Street:Kagy BlvdOut733Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 11th Ave 11th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In611746Out11th Ave In Out 377 285 11th Ave 645InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 1834 70 201 Out In NNNNN 570 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0028 4828 48 76 0.4% 0.7% 0.5%1:0012 2512 25 37 0.2% 0.3% 0.2%2:0013 1213 12 25 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%3:008 48 4 12 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:009 179 17 26 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0038 7838 78 116 0.5% 1.1% 0.8%6:00180 149180 149 329 2.3% 2.0% 2.2%7:00427 399427 399 826 5.6% 5.5% 5.5%8:00462 459462 459 921 6.0% 6.3% 6.1%9:00456 416456 416 872 5.9% 5.7% 5.8%10:00499 426499 426 925 6.5% 5.8% 6.2%11:00523 504523 504 1027 6.8% 6.9% 6.9%12:00592 550592 550 1142 7.7% 7.5% 7.6%13:00541 523541 523 1064 7.0% 7.2% 7.1%14:00499 496499 496 995 6.5% 6.8% 6.6%15:00538 588538 588 1126 7.0% 8.1% 7.5%16:00623 583623 583 1206 8.1% 8.0% 8.0%17:00744 644744 644 1388 9.7% 8.8% 9.3%18:00536 509536 509 1045 7.0% 7.0% 7.0%19:00346 304346 304 650 4.5% 4.2% 4.3%20:00263 219263 219 482 3.4% 3.0% 3.2%21:00196 180196 180 376 2.6% 2.5% 2.5%22:00103 101103 101 204 1.3% 1.4% 1.4%23:0050 6250 62 112 0.7% 0.8% 0.7%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,686 7,296 0 0 0 0 7,686 7,296 14,982 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201510/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - east of 11th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday Saturday02004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour571 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0027 5027 50 77 0.4% 0.7% 0.5%1:009 249 24 33 0.1% 0.3% 0.2%2:0012 1012 10 22 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%3:008 58 5 13 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:009 159 15 24 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0041 6441 64 105 0.6% 0.9% 0.7%6:00195 128195 128 323 2.7% 1.8% 2.2%7:00498 331498 331 829 7.0% 4.5% 5.7%8:00532 426532 426 958 7.5% 5.8% 6.6%9:00522 384522 384 906 7.3% 5.3% 6.3%10:00486 438486 438 924 6.8% 6.0% 6.4%11:00487 494487 494 981 6.8% 6.8% 6.8%12:00528 591528 591 1119 7.4% 8.1% 7.8%13:00524 555524 555 1079 7.4% 7.6% 7.5%14:00451 519451 519 970 6.3% 7.1% 6.7%15:00456 587456 587 1043 6.4% 8.0% 7.2%16:00516 627516 627 1143 7.2% 8.6% 7.9%17:00611 728611 728 1339 8.6% 10.0% 9.3%18:00441 470441 470 911 6.2% 6.4% 6.3%19:00283 306283 306 589 4.0% 4.2% 4.1%20:00199 229199 229 428 2.8% 3.1% 3.0%21:00153 167153 167 320 2.1% 2.3% 2.2%22:0094 9794 97 191 1.3% 1.3% 1.3%23:0043 5943 59 102 0.6% 0.8% 0.7%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,125 7,304 0 0 0 0 7,125 7,304 14,429 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201510/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - west of 11th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday Saturday02004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour572 0.96HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:0024 2624 26 50 0.8% 0.7% 0.7%1:0010 1410 14 24 0.3% 0.4% 0.4%2:002 52 5 7 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%3:003 13 1 4 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%4:004 34 3 7 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%5:0028 728 7 35 0.9% 0.2% 0.5%6:0046 1446 14 60 1.5% 0.4% 0.9%7:00201 96201 96 297 6.4% 2.7% 4.4%8:00190 130190 130 320 6.0% 3.6% 4.8%9:00212 130212 130 342 6.7% 3.6% 5.1%10:00191 207191 207 398 6.1% 5.8% 5.9%11:00223 235223 235 458 7.1% 6.6% 6.8%12:00252 289252 289 541 8.0% 8.1% 8.1%13:00227 300227 300 527 7.2% 8.4% 7.8%14:00174 259174 259 433 5.5% 7.3% 6.4%15:00227 265227 265 492 7.2% 7.4% 7.3%16:00226 300226 300 526 7.2% 8.4% 7.8%17:00282 373282 373 655 9.0% 10.4% 9.7%18:00230 281230 281 511 7.3% 7.9% 7.6%19:00149 219149 219 368 4.7% 6.1% 5.5%20:0093 19093 190 283 3.0% 5.3% 4.2%21:0084 13584 135 219 2.7% 3.8% 3.3%22:0043 5943 59 102 1.4% 1.7% 1.5%23:0029 3229 32 61 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,150 3,570 0 0 0 0 3,150 3,570 6,720 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201510/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:11th Avenue - north of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday Saturday0100200300400500600700Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour573 1.00HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:0016 1516 15 31 1.2% 1.2% 1.2%1:008 78 7 15 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%2:000 20 2 2 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%3:003 23 2 5 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%4:001 31 3 4 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:006 66 6 12 0.4% 0.5% 0.5%6:004 104 10 14 0.3% 0.8% 0.5%7:0054 9654 96 150 4.0% 7.9% 5.8%8:0047 9547 95 142 3.5% 7.9% 5.5%9:0066 9066 90 156 4.8% 7.5% 6.1%10:0089 8489 84 173 6.5% 7.0% 6.7%11:0080 5980 59 139 5.9% 4.9% 5.4%12:00150 105150 105 255 11.0% 8.7% 9.9%13:0087 9487 94 181 6.4% 7.8% 7.0%14:0072 6372 63 135 5.3% 5.2% 5.3%15:00107 59107 59 166 7.9% 4.9% 6.5%16:00131 79131 79 210 9.6% 6.5% 8.2%17:00201 103201 103 304 14.8% 8.5% 11.8%18:0051 3551 35 86 3.7% 2.9% 3.3%19:0063 5763 57 120 4.6% 4.7% 4.7%20:0039 4739 47 86 2.9% 3.9% 3.3%21:0038 4838 48 86 2.8% 4.0% 3.3%22:0027 2727 27 54 2.0% 2.2% 2.1%23:0022 2222 22 44 1.6% 1.8% 1.7%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,362 1,208 0 0 0 0 1,362 1,208 2,570 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday10/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:11th Avenue - south of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTLocal StreetStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/2015050100150200250300350Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour574 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 7:30 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 3 2 78 39 0 119 32 136 2 0 170 294 7:45 AM 11 2 3 0 16 0 6 0 0 6 5 98 34 0 137 25 147 9 0 181 340 8:00 AM 8 0 0 0 8 2 2 0 0 4 1 91 13 0 105 16 108 7 0 131 248 8:15 AM 10 1 0 0 11 1 2 0 0 3 4 100 17 0 121 12 126 10 0 148 283 Grand Total 30 4 3 0 37 3 12 1 0 16 12 367 103 0 482 85 517 28 0 630 1165 Medium Truck % 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.5 3.9 0.0 1.2 3.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Truck % 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.8 3.9 0.0 1.5 3.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total % 2.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 3.2 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.0 1.4 1.0 31.5 8.8 0.0 41.4 7.3 44.4 2.4 0.0 54.1 100.0 PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.86 RT TH LT U 30 4 3 0 85RT517TH28LT0UU0LT103TH367RT120 1 12 3 U LT TH RTIn548 In630Out373Total Entering 1165Out 7th Ave 16 InOut 44 7th Ave 37 In Out 200 Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd482City of Bozeman / MDTThursday, October 15, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts 7th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & 7th AveCounted By: Westbound Agency/Company: J. Staszcuk Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: 7th Ave AM Peak Hour (7:30 - 8:30 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound 7th Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: NNNNN 575 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 5:00 PM 27 2 8 1 38 11 2 0 0 13 1 180 11 0 192 6 151 1 0 158 401 5:15 PM 14 1 6 0 21 3 0 0 0 3 0 172 18 0 190 8 158 0 0 166 380 5:30 PM 19 0 5 0 24 4 3 1 0 8 0 166 27 0 193 7 142 1 0 150 375 5:45 PM 22 2 6 0 30 2 3 1 0 6 0 179 13 0 192 9 146 0 0 155 383 Grand Total 82 5 25 1 113 20 8 2 0 30 1 697 69 0 767 30 597 2 0 629 1539 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total % 5.3 0.3 1.6 0.1 7.3 1.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.9 0.1 45.3 4.5 0.0 49.8 1.9 38.8 0.1 0.0 40.9 100.0 PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 RT TH LT U 82 5 25 1 30RT597TH2LT0UU0LT69TH697RT10 2 8 20 U LT TH RT 7th Ave 629InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 1539 8 30 Out In 7th Ave In Out 113 108 Kagy BlvdOut681Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 7th Ave 7th Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In767742OutNorth/South Street: 7th Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Thursday, October 15, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts East/West Street: Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: J. Staszcuk Kagy Blvd & 7th Ave NNNNN 576 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0032 3332 33 65 0.4% 0.5% 0.4%1:0012 2112 21 33 0.2% 0.3% 0.2%2:0014 814 8 22 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%3:006 16 1 7 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%4:008 158 15 23 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0035 8335 83 118 0.5% 1.1% 0.8%6:00150 162150 162 312 2.0% 2.2% 2.1%7:00304 516304 516 820 4.2% 7.1% 5.6%8:00391 536391 536 927 5.3% 7.4% 6.4%9:00388 454388 454 842 5.3% 6.3% 5.8%10:00431 459431 459 890 5.9% 6.3% 6.1%11:00490 492490 492 982 6.7% 6.8% 6.7%12:00588 504588 504 1092 8.0% 7.0% 7.5%13:00538 509538 509 1047 7.3% 7.0% 7.2%14:00492 501492 501 993 6.7% 6.9% 6.8%15:00540 561540 561 1101 7.4% 7.8% 7.6%16:00631 544631 544 1175 8.6% 7.5% 8.1%17:00740 628740 628 1368 10.1% 8.7% 9.4%18:00540 469540 469 1009 7.4% 6.5% 6.9%19:00351 251351 251 602 4.8% 3.5% 4.1%20:00277 194277 194 471 3.8% 2.7% 3.2%21:00205 152205 152 357 2.8% 2.1% 2.5%22:00106 87106 87 193 1.4% 1.2% 1.3%23:0055 5755 57 112 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,324 7,237 0 0 0 0 7,324 7,237 14,561 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday10/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - east of 7th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201502004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour577 0.96HourBegin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT0:0030 4730 47 77 0.4% 0.6% 0.5%1:0012 2412 24 36 0.2% 0.3% 0.2%2:0014 1214 12 26 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%3:009 59 5 14 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%4:009 189 18 27 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%5:0040 8140 81 121 0.5% 1.1% 0.8%6:00178 150178 150 328 2.3% 2.0% 2.1%7:00412 433412 433 845 5.3% 5.7% 5.5%8:00457 501457 501 958 5.9% 6.7% 6.3%9:00443 453443 453 896 5.7% 6.0% 5.9%10:00480 468480 468 948 6.2% 6.2% 6.2%11:00519 526519 526 1045 6.7% 7.0% 6.8%12:00605 534605 534 1139 7.8% 7.1% 7.4%13:00571 535571 535 1106 7.3% 7.1% 7.2%14:00508 521508 521 1029 6.5% 6.9% 6.7%15:00544 584544 584 1128 7.0% 7.8% 7.4%16:00637 599637 599 1236 8.2% 8.0% 8.1%17:00767 682767 682 1449 9.9% 9.1% 9.5%18:00550 500550 500 1050 7.1% 6.6% 6.9%19:00354 298354 298 652 4.6% 4.0% 4.3%20:00271 221271 221 492 3.5% 2.9% 3.2%21:00204 173204 173 377 2.6% 2.3% 2.5%22:00108 103108 103 211 1.4% 1.4% 1.4%23:0052 6552 65 117 0.7% 0.9% 0.8%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,774 7,533 0 0 0 0 7,774 7,533 15,307 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday10/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:Kagy Boulevard - west of 7th AvenueCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMinor ArterialStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201502004006008001000120014001600Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour578 0.96HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:005 235 23 28 0.4% 1.9% 1.1%1:003 33 3 6 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%2:003 63 6 9 0.2% 0.5% 0.3%3:004 54 5 9 0.3% 0.4% 0.3%4:001 41 4 5 0.1% 0.3% 0.2%5:009 19 1 10 0.6% 0.1% 0.4%6:0040 540 5 45 2.9% 0.4% 1.7%7:00189 22189 22 211 13.5% 1.8% 8.0%8:00118 39118 39 157 8.4% 3.1% 5.9%9:00116 57116 57 173 8.3% 4.6% 6.6%10:00116 81116 81 197 8.3% 6.5% 7.5%11:0086 7586 75 161 6.2% 6.0% 6.1%12:00104 99104 99 203 7.4% 8.0% 7.7%13:0098 10298 102 200 7.0% 8.2% 7.6%14:0080 8580 85 165 5.7% 6.8% 6.3%15:0074 9474 94 168 5.3% 7.6% 6.4%16:0089 12789 127 216 6.4% 10.2% 8.2%17:00106 111106 111 217 7.6% 8.9% 8.2%18:0060 8460 84 144 4.3% 6.8% 5.5%19:0036 8136 81 117 2.6% 6.5% 4.4%20:0017 5117 51 68 1.2% 4.1% 2.6%21:0016 3716 37 53 1.1% 3.0% 2.0%22:0017 3117 31 48 1.2% 2.5% 1.8%23:0010 2010 20 30 0.7% 1.6% 1.1%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,397 1,243 0 0 0 0 1,397 1,243 2,640 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTMajor CollectorStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201510/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:7th Avenue - north of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015TuesdayMondaySundayThursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday Saturday050100150200250Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour579 1.00HourBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT0:000 10 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.2%1:002 22 2 4 0.7% 0.7% 0.7%2:001 11 1 2 0.4% 0.3% 0.3%3:001 11 1 2 0.4% 0.3% 0.3%4:000 00 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%5:001 21 2 3 0.4% 0.7% 0.5%6:000 50 5 5 0.0% 1.7% 0.9%7:0010 4010 40 50 3.6% 13.7% 8.7%8:0018 5018 50 68 6.4% 17.1% 11.8%9:0019 2519 25 44 6.8% 8.5% 7.7%10:0022 2722 27 49 7.8% 9.2% 8.5%11:0023 1023 10 33 8.2% 3.4% 5.7%12:0032 2132 21 53 11.4% 7.2% 9.2%13:0022 2922 29 51 7.8% 9.9% 8.9%14:0024 2724 27 51 8.5% 9.2% 8.9%15:0021 1421 14 35 7.5% 4.8% 6.1%16:0036 1336 13 49 12.8% 4.4% 8.5%17:0030 1130 11 41 10.7% 3.8% 7.1%18:005 45 4 9 1.8% 1.4% 1.6%19:005 25 2 7 1.8% 0.7% 1.2%20:002 02 0 2 0.7% 0.0% 0.3%21:003 33 3 6 1.1% 1.0% 1.0%22:002 22 2 4 0.7% 0.7% 0.7%23:002 32 3 5 0.7% 1.0% 0.9%TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281 293 0 0 0 0 281 293 574 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Thursday10/16/2015 10/17/2015Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday10/14/2015Wednesday10/13/2015VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYGeneral InformationCounted By:Agency/Company:7th Avenue - south of Kagy BoulevardCount Location:Jurisdiction:J. StaszcukSanderson Stewart42292Annual Average Daily Traffic10/15/2015(AADT)Hourly Percentage of Total(%)Dates Performed:City of Bozeman / MDTLocal StreetStreet Classification:Seasonal Count Factor:STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to WillsonProject Number:Project Description:10/12/201510/11/201501020304050607080Hourly AADTTime of DayPercentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour580 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 7:30 AM 13 7 12 0 32 21 25 41 0 87 10 52 10 0 72 26 132 4 0 162 353 7:45 AM 30 16 25 0 71 28 56 47 0 131 13 62 17 0 92 28 102 8 0 138 432 8:00 AM 15 7 8 0 30 22 39 26 0 87 12 57 18 0 87 19 98 8 0 125 329 8:15 AM 14 12 18 0 44 25 30 41 0 96 21 63 14 0 98 21 84 12 0 117 355 Grand Total 72 42 63 0 177 96 150 155 0 401 56 234 59 0 349 94 416 32 0 542 1469 Medium Truck % 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.7 1.8 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 2.1 1.9 9.4 0.0 2.4 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck % 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.3 0.0 1.0 1.8 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.1 1.9 9.4 0.0 2.4 Total % 4.9 2.9 4.3 0.0 12.0 6.5 10.2 10.6 0.0 27.3 3.8 15.9 4.0 0.0 23.8 6.4 28.3 2.2 0.0 36.9 100.0 PHF 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.85 RT TH LT U 72 42 63 0 94RT416TH32LT0UU0LT59TH234RT560 155 150 96 U LT TH RT Westbound Agency/Company: J. Staszcuk Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave AM Peak Hour (7:30 - 8:30 AM) STPU 1212(7)Project Number: Southbound S 3rd Ave Northbound Kagy Blvd Eastbound East/West Street: INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Kagy Blvd & Willson Ave/S 3rd AveCounted By:Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd349City of Bozeman / MDTThursday, October 15, 2015Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts Willson Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Willson Ave 177 In Out 303 S 3rd Ave 401 InOut 130In643 In542Out393Total Entering 1469Out NNNNN 581 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 5:00 PM 23 47 38 0 108 11 34 29 0 74 51 104 30 0 185 33 103 30 0 166 533 5:15 PM 20 45 38 0 103 9 49 35 0 93 48 112 18 0 178 37 87 34 0 158 532 5:30 PM 8 39 30 0 77 13 29 21 0 63 47 95 35 0 177 21 114 26 0 161 478 5:45 PM 12 45 23 0 80 12 43 34 0 89 60 90 32 0 182 19 86 22 0 127 478 Grand Total 63 176 129 0 368 45 155 119 0 319 206 401 115 0 722 110 390 112 0 612 2021 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 Total % 3.1 8.7 6.4 0.0 18.2 2.2 7.7 5.9 0.0 15.8 10.2 19.8 5.7 0.0 35.7 5.4 19.3 5.5 0.0 30.3 100.0 PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 RT TH LT U 63 176 129 0 110RT390TH112LT0UU0LT115TH401RT2060 119 155 45 U LT TH RT Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: J. Staszcuk Kagy Blvd & Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave North/South Street: Willson Ave/S 3rd Ave Kagy Blvd Date Performed: Thursday, October 15, 2015 City of Bozeman / MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: STPU 1212(7)Kagy Blvd. S. 19th to Willson - Fall Counts East/West Street:Kagy BlvdOut572Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Willson Ave S 3rd Ave Kagy Blvd Kagy Blvd Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In722575OutWillson Ave In Out 368 380 S 3rd Ave 612InKagy BlvdTotal Entering 2021 494 319 Out In NNNNN 582 ATTACHMENT C SPRING 2022 TRAFFIC COUNT DATA 583 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 7:45 AM 12 84 117 0 213 59 130 17 0 206 1 2 8 0 11 66 4 22 0 92 522 8:00 AM 6 94 81 0 181 49 153 7 0 209 1 6 11 0 18 74 4 31 0 109 517 8:15 AM 5 53 108 0 166 51 138 15 0 204 6 4 19 0 29 82 8 27 0 117 516 8:30 AM 5 72 104 0 181 65 106 11 0 182 5 11 16 0 32 47 4 28 0 79 474 Grand Total 28 303 410 0 741 224 527 50 0 801 13 23 54 0 90 269 20 108 0 397 2029 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Heavy Truck % 0.0 4.3 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 1.1 1.5 10.0 4.6 0.0 2.8 Total Truck % 0.0 5.0 0.2 0.0 2.2 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 4.3 1.9 0.0 2.2 2.2 10.0 4.6 0.0 3.3 Total % 1.4 14.9 20.2 0.0 36.5 11.0 26.0 2.5 0.0 39.5 0.6 1.1 2.7 0.0 4.4 13.3 1.0 5.3 0.0 19.6 100.0 PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 RT TH LT U 28 303 410 0 269RT20TH108LT0UU0LT54TH23RT130 50 527 224 U LT TH RTIn98 In397Out657Total Entering 2029Out South 19th Avenue 801 InOut 424 South 19th Avenue 741 In Out 850 Kagy BoulevardKagy Boulevard90Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, April 27, 2022Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson South 19th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information South 19th Avenue & Kagy BlvdCounted By: Westbound Agency/Company: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: South 19th Avenue AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) 15060.01Project Number: Southbound South 19th Avenue Northbound Kagy Boulevard Eastbound East/West Street: NNNNN 584 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 5:00 PM 1 121 91 0 213 47 105 4 1 157 5 7 31 0 43 116 3 43 0 162 575 5:15 PM 3 106 92 0 201 42 87 2 0 131 2 6 12 0 20 136 2 50 0 188 540 5:30 PM 1 115 97 0 213 44 89 1 0 134 2 1 12 0 15 104 2 53 0 159 521 5:45 PM 1 111 91 0 203 28 90 1 0 119 6 4 6 0 16 106 2 48 0 156 494 Grand Total 6 453 371 0 830 161 371 8 1 541 15 18 61 0 94 462 9 194 0 665 2130 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total Truck % 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total % 0.3 21.3 17.4 0.0 39.0 7.6 17.4 0.4 0.0 25.4 0.7 0.8 2.9 0.0 4.4 21.7 0.4 9.1 0.0 31.2 100.0 PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.55 0.55 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 RT TH LT U 6 453 371 0 462RT9TH194LT0UU0LT61TH18RT151 8 371 161 U LT TH RT South 19th Avenue 665InKagy BoulevardTotal Entering 2130 663 541 Out In South 19th Avenue In Out 830 894 Kagy BoulevardOut23Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments South 19th Avenue South 19th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In94550OutNorth/South Street: South 19th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Date Performed: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson East/West Street: Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain South 19th Avenue & Kagy Blvd NNNNN 585 0.882 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 20 35 25 28 23 32 55 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% 1:00 8 10 10 11 9 11 20 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 2:00 6 8 5 6 6 7 13 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 4 11 4 8 4 10 14 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 9 17 7 15 8 16 24 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 5:00 77 55 58 54 68 55 123 1.0% 0.8% 0.9% 6:00 149 152 160 152 155 152 307 2.3% 2.2% 2.3% 7:00 550 310 523 294 537 302 839 8.0% 4.5% 6.2% 8:00 562 423 651 423 607 423 1030 9.0% 6.2% 7.6% 9:00 504 335 499 381 502 358 860 7.4% 5.3% 6.4% 10:00 426 390 382 365 404 378 782 6.0% 5.6% 5.8% 11:00 383 398 433 448 408 423 831 6.1% 6.2% 6.1% 12:00 393 495 440 496 417 496 913 6.2% 7.3% 6.8% 13:00 449 468 495 499 472 484 956 7.0% 7.1% 7.1% 14:00 456 465 439 486 448 476 924 6.6% 7.0% 6.8% 15:00 488 597 476 602 482 600 1082 7.1% 8.9% 8.0% 16:00 504 659 530 599 517 629 1146 7.7% 9.3% 8.5% 17:00 544 658 544 645 544 652 1196 8.1% 9.6% 8.8% 18:00 372 452 375 427 374 440 814 5.5% 6.5% 6.0% 19:00 285 296 239 329 262 313 575 3.9% 4.6% 4.3% 20:00 203 246 223 219 213 233 446 3.2% 3.4% 3.3% 21:00 143 156 139 142 141 149 290 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 22:00 91 89 96 104 94 97 191 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 23:00 47 34 46 46 47 40 87 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6,673 6,759 6799 6779 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,742 6,776 13,518 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Thursday 4/29/2022 4/30/2022 Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday 4/27/2022 Wednesday 4/26/2022 VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Agency/Company: Kagy Blvd east of South 19th AvenueCount Location: Jurisdiction: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic4/28/2022 (AADT) Hourly Percentage of Total (%) Dates Performed:City of Bozeman/MDT Minor ArterialStreet Classification: Seasonal Count Factor: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Project Number: Project Description: 4/25/20224/24/2022 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 586 1.000 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 0 3 2 2 1 3 4 0.1% 0.4% 0.2% 1:00 2 1 1 3 2 2 4 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 2:00 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4:00 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 1 2 3 4 2 3 5 0.2% 0.4% 0.3% 6:00 5 8 11 13 8 11 19 0.7% 1.6% 1.0% 7:00 30 54 31 61 31 58 89 2.8% 8.2% 4.9% 8:00 45 78 96 94 71 86 157 6.4% 12.1% 8.7% 9:00 77 51 97 58 87 55 142 7.9% 7.8% 7.8% 10:00 66 56 93 69 80 63 143 7.3% 8.9% 7.9% 11:00 96 66 127 57 112 62 174 10.2% 8.8% 9.6% 12:00 114 71 105 64 110 68 178 10.0% 9.6% 9.8% 13:00 81 60 81 66 81 63 144 7.4% 8.9% 8.0% 14:00 97 54 98 57 98 56 154 8.9% 7.9% 8.5% 15:00 96 59 131 64 114 62 176 10.3% 8.8% 9.7% 16:00 114 45 96 41 105 43 148 9.5% 6.1% 8.2% 17:00 94 23 116 19 105 21 126 9.5% 3.0% 7.0% 18:00 37 18 45 14 41 16 57 3.7% 2.3% 3.1% 19:00 27 7 19 10 23 9 32 2.1% 1.3% 1.8% 20:00 15 3 21 16 18 10 28 1.6% 1.4% 1.5% 21:00 7 4 3 12 5 8 13 0.5% 1.1% 0.7% 22:00 5 5 7 3 6 4 10 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 23:00 2 4 0 2 1 3 4 0.1% 0.4% 0.2% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 1,011 674 1,185 730 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,102 708 1,810 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Local Street Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Blvd west of South 19th Avenue 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 587 0.882 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 41 35 35 34 38 35 73 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1:00 11 11 9 13 10 12 22 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 2:00 7 11 11 10 9 11 20 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 15 5 12 6 14 6 20 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 37 9 33 8 35 9 44 0.4% 0.1% 0.2% 5:00 83 72 90 64 87 68 155 0.9% 0.7% 0.8% 6:00 213 187 218 207 216 197 413 2.2% 2.0% 2.1% 7:00 609 561 561 571 585 566 1151 5.9% 5.8% 5.9% 8:00 822 686 829 723 826 705 1531 8.3% 7.3% 7.8% 9:00 539 533 584 638 562 586 1148 5.7% 6.0% 5.8% 10:00 609 565 582 554 596 560 1156 6.0% 5.8% 5.9% 11:00 662 553 777 585 720 569 1289 7.2% 5.9% 6.6% 12:00 755 699 748 685 752 692 1444 7.6% 7.1% 7.3% 13:00 669 718 717 733 693 726 1419 7.0% 7.5% 7.2% 14:00 662 667 670 672 666 670 1336 6.7% 6.9% 6.8% 15:00 812 783 875 772 844 778 1622 8.5% 8.0% 8.2% 16:00 864 788 783 816 824 802 1626 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 17:00 880 822 800 841 840 832 1672 8.4% 8.6% 8.5% 18:00 560 624 577 655 569 640 1209 5.7% 6.6% 6.1% 19:00 391 504 376 443 384 474 858 3.9% 4.9% 4.4% 20:00 299 365 285 363 292 364 656 2.9% 3.7% 3.3% 21:00 215 230 189 206 202 218 420 2.0% 2.2% 2.1% 22:00 115 125 136 129 126 127 253 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 23:00 46 71 63 70 55 71 126 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 9,916 9,624 9,960 9,798 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,945 9,718 19,663 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Minor Arterial Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South 19th Avenue north of Kagy Blvd 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 588 0.882 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 12 19 15 18 14 19 33 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 1:00 3 6 4 9 4 8 12 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 2:00 3 7 5 5 4 6 10 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 6 4 6 4 6 4 10 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 24 4 21 5 23 5 28 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 5:00 71 38 72 41 72 40 112 1.1% 0.6% 0.8% 6:00 172 146 167 147 170 147 317 2.6% 2.2% 2.4% 7:00 597 287 546 301 572 294 866 8.6% 4.3% 6.4% 8:00 722 419 752 420 737 420 1157 11.1% 6.2% 8.6% 9:00 460 308 418 389 439 349 788 6.6% 5.1% 5.9% 10:00 408 337 381 357 395 347 742 5.9% 5.1% 5.5% 11:00 432 364 517 401 475 383 858 7.1% 5.6% 6.4% 12:00 442 526 444 474 443 500 943 6.7% 7.3% 7.0% 13:00 397 483 454 487 426 485 911 6.4% 7.1% 6.8% 14:00 389 441 388 472 389 457 846 5.8% 6.7% 6.3% 15:00 464 576 532 614 498 595 1093 7.5% 8.7% 8.1% 16:00 484 624 464 615 474 620 1094 7.1% 9.1% 8.1% 17:00 536 655 495 723 516 689 1205 7.8% 10.1% 8.9% 18:00 353 515 365 522 359 519 878 5.4% 7.6% 6.5% 19:00 235 378 212 376 224 377 601 3.4% 5.5% 4.5% 20:00 172 292 203 282 188 287 475 2.8% 4.2% 3.5% 21:00 125 156 140 152 133 154 287 2.0% 2.3% 2.1% 22:00 59 67 62 66 61 67 128 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 23:00 28 39 35 40 32 40 72 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6,594 6,691 6,698 6,920 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,654 6,812 13,466 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Minor Arterial Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South 19th Avenue south of Kagy Blvd 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 589 Hour Begin 0:00 81 1:00 28 2:00 22 3:00 21 4:00 48 5:00 196 6:00 527 7:00 1470 8:00 1935 9:00 1470 10:00 1411 11:00 1578 12:00 1740 13:00 1716 14:00 1631 15:00 1989 16:00 2010 17:00 2104 18:00 1479 19:00 1033 20:00 802 21:00 505 22:00 290 23:00 143 TOTAL 24,229 Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Boulevard & South 19th Avenue 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday (AADT) (%) Total Total AADT 82 79 0.3% AADT 22 20 0.1% 50 46 0.2% 26 29 0.1% 22 21 0.1% 1498 1442 6.1% 1876 1994 8.0% 199 193 0.8% 516 537 2.2% 1405 1534 6.1% 1429 1393 5.8% 1479 1677 6.5% 1750 1730 7.2% 1664 1767 7.1% 1618 1644 6.7% 1940 2037 8.2% 2045 1975 8.3% 2110 2097 8.7% 1466 1492 6.1% 1062 1003 4.3% 798 806 3.3% 518 491 2.1% 278 302 1.2% 135 151 0.6% 0 0 23,988 24,460 0 0 0 100.0% Total Total Total Total Total 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 590 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 7:45 AM 3 11 18 0 32 24 46 11 0 81 19 142 10 0 171 18 93 4 0 115 399 8:00 AM 7 25 9 0 41 14 92 34 0 140 15 100 8 0 123 14 78 5 0 97 401 8:15 AM 6 25 17 0 48 12 55 25 0 92 12 111 13 0 136 19 82 2 0 103 379 8:30 AM 2 17 9 0 28 25 43 11 0 79 11 128 15 0 154 18 57 2 0 77 338 Grand Total 18 78 53 0 149 75 236 81 0 392 57 481 46 0 584 69 310 13 0 392 1517 Medium Truck % 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 2.7 1.3 0.8 2.5 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 Heavy Truck % 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.0 0.3 1.4 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 Total Truck % 0.0 7.7 1.9 0.0 4.7 2.7 1.7 2.5 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.0 0.3 1.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total % 1.2 5.1 3.5 0.0 9.8 4.9 15.6 5.3 0.0 25.8 3.8 31.7 3.0 0.0 38.5 4.5 20.4 0.9 0.0 25.8 100.0 PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.95 RT TH LT U 18 78 53 0 69RT310TH13LT0UU0LT46TH481RT570 81 236 75 U LT TH RT Westbound Agency/Company: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: South 11th Avenue AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) 15060.01Project Number: Southbound South 11th Avenue Northbound Kagy Boulevard Eastbound East/West Street: INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information South 11th Avenue & Kagy BlvdCounted By:Kagy BoulevardKagy Boulevard584Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, April 27, 2022Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson South 11th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments South 11th Avenue 149 In Out 351 South 11th Avenue 392 InOut 148In409 In392Out609Total Entering 1517Out NNNNN 591 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 5:00 PM 16 46 25 0 87 8 43 36 0 87 17 115 23 0 155 32 95 14 0 141 470 5:15 PM 13 39 40 0 92 15 35 26 0 76 16 112 11 0 139 36 121 12 0 169 476 5:30 PM 19 39 36 0 94 15 42 27 0 84 20 103 12 0 135 34 110 14 0 158 471 5:45 PM 15 54 36 0 105 18 40 21 0 79 12 99 9 0 120 28 103 21 1 153 457 Grand Total 63 178 137 0 378 56 160 110 0 326 65 429 55 0 549 130 429 61 1 621 1874 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total % 3.4 9.5 7.3 0.0 20.2 3.0 8.5 5.9 0.0 17.4 3.5 22.9 2.9 0.0 29.3 6.9 22.9 3.3 0.1 33.1 100.0 PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 RT TH LT U 63 178 137 0 130RT429TH61LT1UU0LT55TH429RT650 110 160 56 U LT TH RT Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain South 11th Avenue & Kagy Blvd North/South Street: South 11th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Date Performed: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson East/West Street:Kagy BoulevardOut602Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments South 11th Avenue South 11th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In549623OutSouth 11th Avenue In Out 378 345 South 11th Avenue 621InKagy BoulevardTotal Entering 1874 304 326 Out In NNNNN 592 0.882 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 16 33 25 29 21 31 52 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% 1:00 5 11 7 14 6 13 19 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 2:00 5 4 3 7 4 6 10 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 4 7 2 3 3 5 8 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 5 12 6 6 6 9 15 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 66 45 63 49 65 47 112 0.9% 0.7% 0.8% 6:00 150 139 153 152 152 146 298 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 7:00 498 332 488 310 493 321 814 7.0% 4.8% 5.9% 8:00 507 414 615 414 561 414 975 8.0% 6.1% 7.1% 9:00 508 324 482 365 495 345 840 7.1% 5.1% 6.1% 10:00 467 409 410 360 439 385 824 6.3% 5.7% 6.0% 11:00 424 427 477 455 451 441 892 6.4% 6.5% 6.5% 12:00 428 483 469 521 449 502 951 6.4% 7.5% 6.9% 13:00 482 474 532 472 507 473 980 7.2% 7.0% 7.1% 14:00 480 482 493 470 487 476 963 7.0% 7.1% 7.0% 15:00 510 547 495 573 503 560 1063 7.2% 8.3% 7.7% 16:00 589 580 599 591 594 586 1180 8.5% 8.7% 8.6% 17:00 612 617 581 613 597 615 1212 8.5% 9.1% 8.8% 18:00 406 491 412 421 409 456 865 5.8% 6.8% 6.3% 19:00 292 353 270 338 281 346 627 4.0% 5.1% 4.6% 20:00 234 258 233 232 234 245 479 3.3% 3.6% 3.5% 21:00 151 158 127 156 139 157 296 2.0% 2.3% 2.2% 22:00 71 101 73 107 72 104 176 1.0% 1.5% 1.3% 23:00 33 46 32 53 33 50 83 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6,943 6,747 7047 6711 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,001 6,733 13,734 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Thursday 4/29/2022 4/30/2022 Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday 4/27/2022 Wednesday 4/26/2022 VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Agency/Company: Kagy Blvd east of South 11th AvenueCount Location: Jurisdiction: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic4/28/2022 (AADT) Hourly Percentage of Total (%) Dates Performed:City of Bozeman/MDT Minor ArterialStreet Classification: Seasonal Count Factor: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Project Number: Project Description: 4/25/20224/24/2022 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 593 0.882 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 19 47 28 25 24 36 60 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 1:00 8 9 9 13 9 11 20 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 2:00 5 6 4 5 5 6 11 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 3 10 3 7 3 9 12 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 11 16 6 11 9 14 23 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 5:00 76 51 57 49 67 50 117 1.0% 0.8% 0.9% 6:00 135 148 148 153 142 151 293 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 7:00 478 309 459 302 469 306 775 7.3% 4.8% 6.0% 8:00 501 429 602 422 552 426 978 8.6% 6.6% 7.6% 9:00 493 322 463 361 478 342 820 7.4% 5.3% 6.4% 10:00 416 377 377 353 397 365 762 6.2% 5.7% 5.9% 11:00 398 375 432 421 415 398 813 6.4% 6.2% 6.3% 12:00 392 465 424 486 408 476 884 6.3% 7.4% 6.9% 13:00 429 461 466 480 448 471 919 7.0% 7.3% 7.1% 14:00 422 443 443 482 433 463 896 6.7% 7.2% 7.0% 15:00 455 544 455 558 455 551 1006 7.1% 8.6% 7.8% 16:00 509 625 532 534 521 580 1101 8.1% 9.0% 8.5% 17:00 545 585 515 584 530 585 1115 8.2% 9.1% 8.7% 18:00 360 436 365 391 363 414 777 5.6% 6.4% 6.0% 19:00 277 298 235 301 256 300 556 4.0% 4.7% 4.3% 20:00 188 229 211 220 200 225 425 3.1% 3.5% 3.3% 21:00 140 138 136 128 138 133 271 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 22:00 84 74 79 93 82 84 166 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 23:00 43 35 41 43 42 39 81 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6,387 6,432 6,490 6,422 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,446 6,435 12,881 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Minor Arterial Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Blvd west of South 11th Avenue 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 594 0.882 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 21 34 20 19 21 27 48 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 1:00 7 10 6 8 7 9 16 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 2:00 4 5 4 4 4 5 9 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 4 2 1 3 3 3 6 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 8 4 4 4 6 4 10 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 15 19 28 9 22 14 36 0.6% 0.3% 0.5% 6:00 65 33 56 37 61 35 96 1.6% 0.9% 1.2% 7:00 210 95 186 95 198 95 293 5.2% 2.3% 3.7% 8:00 280 174 331 158 306 166 472 8.1% 4.1% 6.0% 9:00 231 146 205 150 218 148 366 5.8% 3.7% 4.7% 10:00 234 198 215 195 225 197 422 5.9% 4.9% 5.4% 11:00 250 211 264 204 257 208 465 6.8% 5.1% 5.9% 12:00 271 294 272 287 272 291 563 7.2% 7.2% 7.2% 13:00 259 310 246 339 253 325 578 6.7% 8.0% 7.4% 14:00 227 275 245 313 236 294 530 6.2% 7.3% 6.8% 15:00 302 331 304 344 303 338 641 8.0% 8.4% 8.2% 16:00 272 425 302 380 287 403 690 7.6% 10.0% 8.8% 17:00 324 376 347 428 336 402 738 8.9% 9.9% 9.4% 18:00 269 326 227 309 248 318 566 6.6% 7.9% 7.2% 19:00 219 278 191 262 205 270 475 5.4% 6.7% 6.1% 20:00 134 242 135 202 135 222 357 3.6% 5.5% 4.6% 21:00 93 154 100 143 97 149 246 2.6% 3.7% 3.1% 22:00 60 67 48 85 54 76 130 1.4% 1.9% 1.7% 23:00 27 45 29 42 28 44 72 0.7% 1.1% 0.9% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3,786 4,054 3,766 4,020 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,782 4,043 7,825 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Minor Arterial Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South 11th Avenue north of Kagy Blvd 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 595 1.000 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 26 29 21 29 24 29 53 0.6% 0.8% 0.7% 1:00 9 17 8 13 9 15 24 0.2% 0.4% 0.3% 2:00 6 6 5 9 6 8 14 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 3:00 7 0 3 1 5 1 6 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 4:00 7 4 9 3 8 4 12 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 5:00 27 35 37 9 32 22 54 0.8% 0.6% 0.7% 6:00 81 18 68 38 75 28 103 2.0% 0.7% 1.4% 7:00 244 117 237 110 241 114 355 6.3% 3.0% 4.7% 8:00 327 182 399 179 363 181 544 9.5% 4.7% 7.1% 9:00 239 129 223 142 231 136 367 6.1% 3.6% 4.8% 10:00 234 172 218 166 226 169 395 5.9% 4.4% 5.2% 11:00 195 180 265 183 230 182 412 6.0% 4.8% 5.4% 12:00 222 229 240 247 231 238 469 6.1% 6.2% 6.2% 13:00 240 253 241 263 241 258 499 6.3% 6.8% 6.5% 14:00 208 241 239 245 224 243 467 5.9% 6.4% 6.1% 15:00 349 322 325 342 337 332 669 8.8% 8.7% 8.8% 16:00 331 362 269 346 300 354 654 7.9% 9.3% 8.6% 17:00 326 345 324 373 325 359 684 8.5% 9.4% 9.0% 18:00 229 303 215 291 222 297 519 5.8% 7.8% 6.8% 19:00 180 292 169 252 175 272 447 4.6% 7.1% 5.9% 20:00 114 217 122 186 118 202 320 3.1% 5.3% 4.2% 21:00 99 179 88 178 94 179 273 2.5% 4.7% 3.6% 22:00 65 118 54 117 60 118 178 1.6% 3.1% 2.3% 23:00 34 77 30 67 32 72 104 0.8% 1.9% 1.4% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3,799 3,827 3,809 3,789 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,809 3,813 7,622 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Local Street Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South 11th Avenue south of Kagy Blvd 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 596 Hour Begin 0:00 105 1:00 39 2:00 20 3:00 16 4:00 30 5:00 160 6:00 397 7:00 1125 8:00 1495 9:00 1202 10:00 1204 11:00 1294 12:00 1432 13:00 1486 14:00 1426 15:00 1690 16:00 1809 17:00 1872 18:00 1358 19:00 1046 20:00 785 21:00 537 22:00 321 23:00 167 TOTAL 21,016 Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Boulevard & South 11th Avenue 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday (AADT) (%) Total Total 112 38 20 19 34 167 388 97 39 20 12 25 152 1088 802 551 1453 1387 1682 1845 1864 1406 1149 1416 1202 1257 1231 1391 1472 1518 1465 1697 1772 1880 405 1101 1573 1201 1150 1356 0 0 0 0 021,030 1310 1004 767 523 325 166 317 168 20,987 5.4% 7.1% 5.7% 5.7% AADT 0.5% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.8% 100.0% Total Total Total Total Total AADT 8.9% 6.5% 5.0% 3.7% 2.6% 1.5% 6.2% 6.8% 7.1% 6.8% 8.0% 8.6% 0.8% 1.9% 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 597 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 7:45 AM 13 4 2 0 19 2 2 0 0 4 4 94 73 0 171 22 105 5 0 132 326 8:00 AM 9 0 0 0 9 1 2 0 0 3 7 86 26 0 119 12 100 5 0 117 248 8:15 AM 11 1 1 0 13 1 1 1 0 3 6 91 30 0 127 8 94 8 0 110 253 8:30 AM 13 2 3 0 18 0 2 0 0 2 9 94 42 0 145 12 87 6 0 105 270 Grand Total 46 7 6 0 59 4 7 1 0 12 26 365 171 0 562 54 386 24 0 464 1097 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck % 0.0 14.3 16.7 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.9 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 Total Truck % 0.0 14.3 16.7 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.9 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 Total % 4.2 0.6 0.5 0.0 5.4 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.0 1.1 2.4 33.3 15.6 0.0 51.2 4.9 35.2 2.2 0.0 42.3 100.0 PHF 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.84 RT TH LT U 46 7 6 0 54RT386TH24LT0UU0LT171TH365RT260 1 7 4 U LT TH RTIn433 In464Out375Total Entering 1097Out South 7th Avenue 12 InOut 57 South 7th Avenue 59 In Out 232 Kagy BoulevardKagy Boulevard562Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, April 27, 2022Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson South 7th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information South 7th Avenue & Kagy BlvdCounted By: Westbound Agency/Company: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: South 7th Avenue AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) 15060.01Project Number: Southbound South 7th Avenue Northbound Kagy Boulevard Eastbound East/West Street: NNNNN 598 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 5:00 PM 45 2 4 0 51 12 1 1 0 14 1 138 12 0 151 4 108 1 0 113 329 5:15 PM 45 1 7 0 53 10 4 3 0 17 2 153 14 0 169 4 118 1 0 123 362 5:30 PM 44 2 6 0 52 8 1 1 0 10 1 134 13 0 148 4 107 3 0 114 324 5:45 PM 52 1 9 0 62 7 0 1 0 8 1 126 28 0 155 3 97 1 0 101 326 Grand Total 186 6 26 0 218 37 6 6 0 49 5 551 67 0 623 15 430 6 0 451 1341 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck % 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Truck % 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total % 13.9 0.4 1.9 0.0 16.3 2.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.7 0.4 41.1 5.0 0.0 46.5 1.1 32.1 0.4 0.0 33.6 100.0 PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 RT TH LT U 186 6 26 0 15RT430TH6LT0UU0LT67TH551RT50 6 6 37 U LT TH RT South 7th Avenue 451InKagy BoulevardTotal Entering 1341 17 49 Out In South 7th Avenue In Out 218 88 Kagy BoulevardOut622Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments South 7th Avenue South 7th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In623614OutNorth/South Street: South 7th Avenue Kagy Boulevard Date Performed: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson East/West Street: Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain South 7th Avenue & Kagy Blvd NNNNN 599 0.882 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 9 14 18 15 14 15 29 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 1:00 4 9 6 8 5 9 14 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 2:00 5 4 2 3 4 4 8 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 2 5 0 2 1 4 5 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 4:00 4 11 7 5 6 8 14 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 47 49 48 48 48 49 97 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 6:00 118 144 115 158 117 151 268 2.1% 2.7% 2.4% 7:00 280 376 267 359 274 368 642 4.9% 6.6% 5.8% 8:00 358 431 399 466 379 449 828 6.8% 8.1% 7.5% 9:00 321 336 306 382 314 359 673 5.7% 6.5% 6.1% 10:00 325 363 311 305 318 334 652 5.7% 6.0% 5.9% 11:00 341 383 368 382 355 383 738 6.4% 6.9% 6.6% 12:00 351 391 366 416 359 404 763 6.5% 7.3% 6.9% 13:00 356 371 430 353 393 362 755 7.1% 6.5% 6.8% 14:00 398 370 411 356 405 363 768 7.3% 6.5% 6.9% 15:00 450 415 428 425 439 420 859 7.9% 7.5% 7.7% 16:00 522 418 554 448 538 433 971 9.7% 7.8% 8.7% 17:00 605 449 518 478 562 464 1026 10.1% 8.3% 9.2% 18:00 361 368 342 291 352 330 682 6.4% 5.9% 6.1% 19:00 247 272 259 237 253 255 508 4.6% 4.6% 4.6% 20:00 210 188 212 170 211 179 390 3.8% 3.2% 3.5% 21:00 114 108 100 119 107 114 221 1.9% 2.0% 2.0% 22:00 56 70 65 74 61 72 133 1.1% 1.3% 1.2% 23:00 25 33 29 39 27 36 63 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 5,509 5,578 5561 5539 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,542 5,565 11,107 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Thursday 4/29/2022 4/30/2022 Friday SaturdayTuesdayMondaySunday 4/27/2022 Wednesday 4/26/2022 VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Agency/Company: Kagy Blvd east of South 7th AvenueCount Location: Jurisdiction: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic4/28/2022 (AADT) Hourly Percentage of Total (%) Dates Performed:City of Bozeman/MDT Minor ArterialStreet Classification: Seasonal Count Factor: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Project Number: Project Description: 4/25/20224/24/2022 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 600 0.882 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 14 30 25 30 20 30 50 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 1:00 5 10 8 14 7 12 19 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 2:00 6 4 2 5 4 5 9 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 4 6 2 3 3 5 8 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 4 12 5 6 5 9 14 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 64 50 60 52 62 51 113 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 6:00 148 141 146 160 147 151 298 2.1% 2.2% 2.2% 7:00 475 343 476 332 476 338 814 6.9% 5.0% 6.0% 8:00 491 434 565 456 528 445 973 7.7% 6.6% 7.1% 9:00 467 355 447 400 457 378 835 6.6% 5.6% 6.1% 10:00 445 436 396 367 421 402 823 6.1% 6.0% 6.0% 11:00 420 428 473 464 447 446 893 6.5% 6.6% 6.5% 12:00 431 495 478 530 455 513 968 6.6% 7.6% 7.1% 13:00 466 461 517 444 492 453 945 7.1% 6.7% 6.9% 14:00 482 476 488 451 485 464 949 7.0% 6.9% 7.0% 15:00 520 529 510 568 515 549 1064 7.5% 8.1% 7.8% 16:00 595 555 606 575 601 565 1166 8.7% 8.4% 8.5% 17:00 618 618 586 600 602 609 1211 8.7% 9.0% 8.9% 18:00 427 486 412 398 420 442 862 6.1% 6.6% 6.3% 19:00 284 338 275 334 280 336 616 4.1% 5.0% 4.5% 20:00 227 248 236 225 232 237 469 3.4% 3.5% 3.4% 21:00 144 151 129 154 137 153 290 2.0% 2.3% 2.1% 22:00 68 101 72 102 70 102 172 1.0% 1.5% 1.3% 23:00 33 46 33 52 33 49 82 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6,838 6,753 6,947 6,722 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,899 6,744 13,643 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Minor Arterial Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Blvd west of South 7th Avenue 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 601 0.882 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 9 19 8 17 9 18 27 0.4% 0.9% 0.7% 1:00 3 3 1 6 2 5 7 0.1% 0.3% 0.2% 2:00 1 0 0 3 1 2 3 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 3 1 2 1 3 1 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 1 1 0 2 1 2 3 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 17 8 16 10 17 9 26 0.8% 0.5% 0.7% 6:00 39 17 41 21 40 19 59 2.0% 1.0% 1.5% 7:00 259 41 262 43 261 42 303 12.8% 2.2% 7.7% 8:00 160 66 200 78 180 72 252 8.8% 3.8% 6.4% 9:00 197 75 176 87 187 81 268 9.1% 4.3% 6.8% 10:00 158 122 134 121 146 122 268 7.1% 6.4% 6.8% 11:00 114 87 143 113 129 100 229 6.3% 5.3% 5.8% 12:00 136 158 161 165 149 162 311 7.3% 8.5% 7.9% 13:00 157 145 136 130 147 138 285 7.2% 7.3% 7.2% 14:00 133 159 131 135 132 147 279 6.5% 7.7% 7.1% 15:00 126 171 147 187 137 179 316 6.7% 9.4% 8.0% 16:00 137 181 125 181 131 181 312 6.4% 9.5% 7.9% 17:00 88 216 148 177 118 197 315 5.8% 10.4% 8.0% 18:00 91 137 90 129 91 133 224 4.4% 7.0% 5.7% 19:00 65 89 56 127 61 108 169 3.0% 5.7% 4.3% 20:00 42 78 37 75 40 77 117 2.0% 4.1% 3.0% 21:00 35 51 34 44 35 48 83 1.7% 2.5% 2.1% 22:00 17 34 19 44 18 39 57 0.9% 2.1% 1.4% 23:00 14 17 8 19 11 18 29 0.5% 0.9% 0.7% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 2,002 1,876 2,075 1,915 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,046 1,900 3,946 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Major Collector Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South 7th Avenue north of Kagy Blvd 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 602 1.000 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 1:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 5:00 5 14 1 4 3 9 12 0.8% 2.3% 1.6% 6:00 6 18 3 14 5 16 21 1.4% 4.1% 2.8% 7:00 25 35 13 32 19 34 53 5.4% 8.7% 7.1% 8:00 18 59 10 71 14 65 79 4.0% 16.7% 10.6% 9:00 27 33 15 53 21 43 64 5.9% 11.0% 8.6% 10:00 16 28 18 29 17 29 46 4.8% 7.4% 6.2% 11:00 16 24 30 22 23 23 46 6.5% 5.9% 6.2% 12:00 27 25 25 27 26 26 52 7.4% 6.7% 7.0% 13:00 25 34 31 20 28 27 55 7.9% 6.9% 7.4% 14:00 24 28 39 23 32 26 58 9.1% 6.7% 7.8% 15:00 23 24 40 15 32 20 52 9.1% 5.1% 7.0% 16:00 35 12 39 18 37 15 52 10.5% 3.8% 7.0% 17:00 49 17 46 17 48 17 65 13.6% 4.4% 8.7% 18:00 17 10 13 14 15 12 27 4.2% 3.1% 3.6% 19:00 9 3 18 7 14 5 19 4.0% 1.3% 2.6% 20:00 12 5 1 9 7 7 14 2.0% 1.8% 1.9% 21:00 1 5 5 8 3 7 10 0.8% 1.8% 1.3% 22:00 6 3 3 7 5 5 10 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 23:00 3 1 0 2 2 2 4 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 344 378 352 395 0 0 0 0 0 0 353 390 743 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) (%) 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Local Street Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South 7th Avenue south of Kagy Blvd 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 603 Hour Begin 0:00 53 1:00 20 2:00 9 3:00 8 4:00 15 5:00 123 6:00 322 7:00 904 8:00 1063 9:00 918 10:00 893 11:00 952 12:00 1046 13:00 1019 14:00 1027 15:00 1146 16:00 1252 17:00 1310 18:00 897 19:00 656 20:00 494 21:00 301 22:00 186 23:00 89 TOTAL 14,703 Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Boulevard & South 7th Avenue 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday (AADT) (%) Total Total 47 17 10 10 16 126 315 58 22 8 5 13 119 654 505 304 1007 1035 1129 1229 1332 949 917 1006 905 946 906 1007 1084 1031 1018 1162 1274 1287 328 891 1119 931 840 998 0 0 0 0 014,753 845 657 482 297 193 91 178 86 14,636 6.1% 7.2% 6.2% 6.1% AADT 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% 100.0% Total Total Total Total Total AADT 8.9% 6.1% 4.5% 3.4% 2.0% 1.3% 6.5% 7.1% 6.9% 7.0% 7.8% 8.5% 0.8% 2.2% 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 604 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 7:45 AM 16 24 16 0 56 26 64 27 0 117 9 66 18 0 93 44 94 33 0 171 437 8:00 AM 21 36 12 0 69 31 98 21 0 150 6 52 12 0 70 46 71 46 0 163 452 8:15 AM 15 16 34 0 65 47 51 13 0 111 11 75 18 0 104 39 86 17 0 142 422 8:30 AM 18 9 22 0 49 14 35 8 0 57 8 55 13 0 76 24 77 9 0 110 292 Grand Total 70 85 84 0 239 118 248 69 0 435 34 248 61 0 343 153 328 105 0 586 1603 Medium Truck % 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.2 1.6 0.0 1.2 2.6 2.4 1.0 0.0 2.2 Total Truck % 0.0 1.2 2.4 0.0 1.3 0.8 0.4 2.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.2 1.6 0.0 1.2 2.6 2.4 1.9 0.0 2.4 Total % 4.4 5.3 5.2 0.0 14.9 7.4 15.5 4.3 0.0 27.1 2.1 15.5 3.8 0.0 21.4 9.5 20.5 6.6 0.0 36.6 100.0 PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.73 0.73 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 RT TH LT U 70 85 84 0 153RT328TH105LT0UU0LT61TH248RT340 69 248 118 U LT TH RT Westbound Agency/Company: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart North/South Street: South Willson Avenue AM Peak Hour (7:45 - 8:45 AM) 15060.01Project Number: Southbound South Willson Avenue Northbound Kagy Boulevard Eastbound East/West Street: INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information South Willson Avenue & Kagy BlvdCounted By:Kagy BoulevardKagy Boulevard343Bozeman, MT /MDTWednesday, April 27, 2022Date Performed: Count Time Period: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson South Willson Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments South Willson Avenue 239 In Out 462 South Willson Avenue 435 InOut 224In467 In586Out450Total Entering 1603Out NNNNN 605 Intersection: Jurisdiction: Project Description: Int. Start Time Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Right Thru Left U-turn Total Total Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 5:00 PM 17 42 31 0 90 19 38 10 0 67 14 102 42 0 158 28 79 28 0 135 450 5:15 PM 20 47 39 0 106 20 39 26 0 85 15 110 21 0 146 33 71 30 0 134 471 5:30 PM 17 28 26 0 71 18 28 12 0 58 14 101 39 0 154 22 87 35 0 144 427 5:45 PM 17 40 28 0 85 16 24 8 0 48 17 82 32 0 131 16 69 25 2 112 376 Grand Total 71 157 124 0 352 73 129 56 0 258 60 395 134 0 589 99 306 118 2 525 1724 Medium Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heavy Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Truck % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total % 4.1 9.1 7.2 0.0 20.4 4.2 7.5 3.2 0.0 15.0 3.5 22.9 7.8 0.0 34.2 5.7 17.7 6.8 0.1 30.5 100.0 PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.76 0.76 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.91 RT TH LT U 71 157 124 0 99RT306TH118LT2UU0LT134TH395RT600 56 129 73 U LT TH RT Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain South Willson Avenue & Kagy Blvd North/South Street: South Willson Avenue Kagy Boulevard Date Performed: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Bozeman, MT /MDT Count Time Period: PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 PM) Project Number: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson East/West Street:Kagy BoulevardOut433Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments South Willson Avenue South Willson Avenue Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard Southbound Northbound Eastbound Westbound In589594OutSouth Willson Avenue In Out 352 362 South Willson Avenue 525InKagy BoulevardTotal Entering 1724 335 258 Out In NNNNN 606 0.882 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 5 10 12 14 9 12 21 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 1:00 5 7 4 7 5 7 12 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 2:00 7 5 3 4 5 5 10 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 3 6 1 3 2 5 7 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 10 9 9 4 10 7 17 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 5:00 54 48 53 48 54 48 102 1.0% 0.8% 0.9% 6:00 154 126 138 127 146 127 273 2.6% 2.2% 2.4% 7:00 342 398 322 406 332 402 734 6.0% 7.1% 6.5% 8:00 469 496 460 548 465 522 987 8.4% 9.2% 8.8% 9:00 312 331 311 374 312 353 665 5.6% 6.2% 5.9% 10:00 339 387 292 346 316 367 683 5.7% 6.5% 6.1% 11:00 307 381 366 381 337 381 718 6.1% 6.7% 6.4% 12:00 350 395 370 393 360 394 754 6.5% 6.9% 6.7% 13:00 353 327 433 353 393 340 733 7.1% 6.0% 6.5% 14:00 378 353 403 369 391 361 752 7.0% 6.4% 6.7% 15:00 520 441 482 480 501 461 962 9.0% 8.1% 8.6% 16:00 516 436 559 468 538 452 990 9.7% 8.0% 8.8% 17:00 588 520 499 525 544 523 1067 9.8% 9.2% 9.5% 18:00 320 427 294 291 307 359 666 5.5% 6.3% 5.9% 19:00 224 262 197 213 211 238 449 3.8% 4.2% 4.0% 20:00 155 136 187 139 171 138 309 3.1% 2.4% 2.7% 21:00 97 83 80 93 89 88 177 1.6% 1.5% 1.6% 22:00 48 61 47 66 48 64 112 0.9% 1.1% 1.0% 23:00 20 26 23 27 22 27 49 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 5,576 5,671 5545 5679 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,568 5,681 11,249 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (AADT) Hourly Percentage of Total (%) Dates Performed:City of Bozeman/MDT Minor ArterialStreet Classification: Seasonal Count Factor: 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Project Number: Project Description: 4/25/20224/24/2022 4/27/2022 Wednesday 4/26/2022 VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Agency/Company: Kagy Blvd east of South Willson AvenueCount Location: Jurisdiction: Gannon Chamberlain Sanderson Stewart 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic4/28/2022 TuesdayMondaySunday Thursday 4/29/2022 4/30/2022 Friday Saturday 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 607 0.882 Hour Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB ADT EB WB ADT 0:00 7 14 16 14 12 14 26 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 1:00 4 8 5 9 5 9 14 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 2:00 4 4 2 3 3 4 7 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 3 6 0 2 2 4 6 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 4:00 6 11 7 5 7 8 15 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 41 50 43 47 42 49 91 0.8% 0.9% 0.8% 6:00 110 144 115 159 113 152 265 2.1% 2.8% 2.5% 7:00 254 368 245 359 250 364 614 4.7% 6.7% 5.7% 8:00 367 443 360 463 364 453 817 6.8% 8.3% 7.6% 9:00 300 342 269 391 285 367 652 5.4% 6.8% 6.1% 10:00 306 381 301 349 304 365 669 5.7% 6.7% 6.2% 11:00 321 368 339 366 330 367 697 6.2% 6.8% 6.5% 12:00 349 373 373 398 361 386 747 6.8% 7.1% 7.0% 13:00 341 349 422 323 382 336 718 7.2% 6.2% 6.7% 14:00 396 353 391 339 394 346 740 7.4% 6.4% 6.9% 15:00 431 389 428 403 430 396 826 8.1% 7.3% 7.7% 16:00 508 386 550 408 529 397 926 10.0% 7.3% 8.6% 17:00 585 429 494 449 540 439 979 10.2% 8.1% 9.1% 18:00 350 404 331 280 341 342 683 6.4% 6.3% 6.4% 19:00 250 264 242 230 246 247 493 4.6% 4.6% 4.6% 20:00 200 175 205 164 203 170 373 3.8% 3.1% 3.5% 21:00 84 108 93 109 89 109 198 1.7% 2.0% 1.8% 22:00 56 67 63 71 60 69 129 1.1% 1.3% 1.2% 23:00 19 33 26 36 23 35 58 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 5,292 5,469 5,320 5,377 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,315 5,428 10,743 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Blvd west of South Willson Avenue Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Minor Arterial Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday (AADT) (%) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 608 0.882 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 1 11 6 4 4 8 12 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 1:00 4 4 4 8 4 6 10 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 2:00 3 4 3 3 3 4 7 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 4 0 3 1 4 1 5 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 4:00 4 2 7 4 6 3 9 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 5:00 25 18 26 13 26 16 42 0.7% 0.5% 0.6% 6:00 64 48 69 47 67 48 115 1.7% 1.4% 1.6% 7:00 263 139 286 137 275 138 413 7.1% 4.1% 5.7% 8:00 410 214 451 243 431 229 660 11.2% 6.8% 9.1% 9:00 217 152 204 175 211 164 375 5.5% 4.9% 5.2% 10:00 221 168 206 165 214 167 381 5.5% 5.0% 5.3% 11:00 242 192 257 200 250 196 446 6.5% 5.8% 6.2% 12:00 286 213 257 238 272 226 498 7.0% 6.7% 6.9% 13:00 222 229 272 210 247 220 467 6.4% 6.5% 6.5% 14:00 268 224 257 232 263 228 491 6.8% 6.8% 6.8% 15:00 322 366 351 348 337 357 694 8.7% 10.6% 9.6% 16:00 337 286 301 309 319 298 617 8.3% 8.9% 8.5% 17:00 359 349 327 343 343 346 689 8.9% 10.3% 9.5% 18:00 233 230 236 201 235 216 451 6.1% 6.4% 6.2% 19:00 140 185 131 158 136 172 308 3.5% 5.1% 4.3% 20:00 108 156 113 147 111 152 263 2.9% 4.5% 3.6% 21:00 34 84 65 117 50 101 151 1.3% 3.0% 2.1% 22:00 37 39 47 39 42 39 81 1.1% 1.2% 1.1% 23:00 5 21 21 31 13 26 39 0.3% 0.8% 0.5% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3,809 3,334 3,900 3,373 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,863 3,361 7,224 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South Willson Avenue north of Kagy Blvd Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Minor Arterial Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday (AADT) (%) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 609 0.882 Hour Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB ADT NB SB ADT 0:00 2 10 5 6 4 8 12 0.1% 0.3% 0.2% 1:00 4 3 3 6 4 5 9 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 2:00 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3:00 4 1 3 1 4 1 5 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 4:00 8 1 10 3 9 2 11 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 5:00 32 9 33 11 33 10 43 0.9% 0.3% 0.7% 6:00 102 24 104 26 103 25 128 2.9% 0.8% 2.0% 7:00 306 125 302 123 304 124 428 8.7% 4.1% 6.6% 8:00 429 184 413 190 421 187 608 12.0% 6.2% 9.4% 9:00 220 131 211 123 216 127 343 6.2% 4.2% 5.3% 10:00 210 130 207 172 209 151 360 6.0% 5.0% 5.5% 11:00 205 182 213 145 209 164 373 6.0% 5.5% 5.7% 12:00 236 184 223 203 230 194 424 6.6% 6.5% 6.5% 13:00 205 178 237 195 221 187 408 6.3% 6.2% 6.3% 14:00 217 190 211 205 214 198 412 6.1% 6.6% 6.3% 15:00 311 318 304 325 308 322 630 8.8% 10.8% 9.7% 16:00 280 272 231 290 256 281 537 7.3% 9.4% 8.3% 17:00 254 332 274 361 264 347 611 7.5% 11.6% 9.4% 18:00 174 224 182 194 178 209 387 5.1% 7.0% 6.0% 19:00 110 180 120 175 115 178 293 3.3% 5.9% 4.5% 20:00 86 139 113 140 100 140 240 2.9% 4.7% 3.7% 21:00 49 61 44 93 47 77 124 1.3% 2.6% 1.9% 22:00 27 32 39 42 33 37 70 0.9% 1.2% 1.1% 23:00 9 18 17 20 13 19 32 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3,481 2,929 3,501 3,051 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,497 2,995 6,492 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: South 3rd Avenue south of Kagy Blvd Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT Project Number: 15060.01 Street Classification: Major Collector Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson Seasonal Count Factor: 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday (AADT) (%) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 610 Hour Begin 0:00 35 1:00 21 2:00 13 3:00 10 4:00 25 5:00 138 6:00 390 7:00 1094 8:00 1535 9:00 1016 10:00 1045 11:00 1116 12:00 1210 13:00 1162 14:00 1197 15:00 1555 16:00 1534 17:00 1672 18:00 1093 19:00 770 20:00 591 21:00 324 22:00 195 23:00 88 TOTAL 17,829 Total Total Total Total Total 75 101 0.5% 0 0 17,778 17,873 0 0 0 100.0% 300 347 1.8% 183 207 1.1% 807 733 4.3% 578 604 3.3% 1708 1636 9.4% 1181 1005 6.1% 1549 1560 8.7% 1510 1558 8.6% 1102 1222 6.5% 1190 1203 6.7% 1099 1133 6.3% 1193 1227 6.8% 1003 1029 5.7% 1071 1019 5.9% 1097 1090 6.1% 1506 1564 8.6% 139 137 0.8% 386 393 2.2% 25 25 0.1% 19 23 0.1% 14 11 0.1% Total Total AADT 30 39 0.2% AADT 13 7 0.1% Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday (AADT) (%) 4/24/2022 4/25/2022 4/26/2022 4/27/2022 4/28/2022 4/29/2022 Project Number: 15060.01 Project Description: Kagy Blvd - 19th to Willson 4/30/2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic Hourly Percentage of Total Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart Dates Performed: 4/26/2022 and 4/27/2022 Jurisdiction: City of Bozeman/MDT VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY General Information Counted By: Gannon Chamberlain Count Location: Kagy Boulevard & South 19th Avenue 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Hourly AADTTime of Day Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour 611 APPENDIX B – EXISTING CONDITIONS (2022) CAPACITY CALCULATIONS 612 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 41.7 D 4 31.1 C 4 WB 39.1 D 7 31.9 C 12 NB 13.1 B 8 22.7 C 7 SB 8.2 A 6 14.1 B 8 Intersection 17.6 B --22.6 C -- EB 20.7 C 21 17.4 B 18 WB 15.8 B 14 22.5 C 21 NB 20.6 C 10 22.7 C 7 SB 16.7 B 4 22.0 C 8 Intersection 19.0 B --20.9 C -- EB 2.8 A 1 0.9 A 1 WB 0.4 A 1 0.1 A 0 NB 33.6 D 1 21.6 C 1 SB 20.8 C 1 17.9 C 2 Intersection 3.1 A --4.2 A -- EB 18.7 B 10 19.0 B 16 WB 20.2 C 13 17.7 B 12 NB 20.7 C 10 22.5 C 6 SB 18.3 B 6 22.7 C 9 Intersection 19.7 B --20.0 C -- Intersection Approach Existing (2022) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Kagy Boulevard & South 7th Avenue Intersection Control Signalized Kagy Boulevard & South Willson Avenue Intersection Control Signalized Kagy Boulevard & South 11th Avenue Intersection Control Two-Way Stop-Control (NB/SB) 613 Queues 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 AM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 24 13 111 21 277 52 543 231 423 341 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.11 0.05 0.67 0.10 0.48 0.08 0.30 0.25 0.57 0.15 Control Delay 50.1 43.8 0.3 67.9 43.6 24.2 6.9 17.3 3.3 7.3 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 50.1 43.8 0.3 67.9 43.6 24.2 6.9 17.3 3.3 7.3 6.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 17 0 83 14 131 7 115 0 74 40 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 40 0 137 37 166 20 199 48 146 72 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 344 454 467 333 429 831 686 1796 923 917 2250 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.33 0.05 0.33 0.08 0.30 0.25 0.46 0.15 Intersection Summary 614 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 AM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 54 23 13 108 20 269 50 527 224 410 303 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 54 23 13 108 20 269 50 527 224 410 303 28 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1695 1750 1682 1614 1723 1750 1723 1750 1750 1682 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 24 13 111 21 277 52 543 231 423 312 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 4 0 5 10 2 0 2 0 0 5 0 Cap, veh/h 305 317 277 298 302 454 726 1887 855 698 1970 182 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.58 0.58 0.12 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 1391 1695 1483 1354 1614 1460 1667 3273 1483 1667 2957 273 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 24 13 111 21 277 52 543 231 423 168 173 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1391 1695 1483 1354 1614 1460 1667 1637 1483 1667 1598 1633 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 1.4 0.9 8.8 1.3 19.4 1.5 10.1 9.4 11.5 4.7 4.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.4 1.4 0.9 10.2 1.3 19.4 1.5 10.1 9.4 11.5 4.7 4.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 305 317 277 298 302 454 726 1887 855 698 1064 1087 V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.08 0.05 0.37 0.07 0.61 0.07 0.29 0.27 0.61 0.16 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 421 458 400 410 436 575 822 1887 855 1131 1064 1087 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.4 40.2 40.0 44.4 40.2 35.2 9.4 12.9 12.7 7.6 7.5 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.1 1.3 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.6 0.3 3.0 0.5 7.0 0.5 3.6 3.1 3.6 1.5 1.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.7 40.3 40.1 45.2 40.3 36.5 9.4 13.3 13.5 8.5 7.8 7.8 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D A B B A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 93 409 826 764 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.7 39.1 13.1 8.2 Approach LOS D D B A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.9 74.1 27.1 8.1 84.8 27.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 46.0 28.1 32.4 11.0 63.1 32.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.5 12.1 7.4 3.5 6.8 21.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 3.8 0.3 0.0 2.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.6 HCM 6th LOS B 615 HCM 6th TWSC 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 12/16/2022 AM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 171 365 26 24 386 54 1 7 4 6 7 46 Future Vol, veh/h 171 365 26 24 386 54 1 7 4 6 7 46 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 130 - - - - - - - 115 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 17 14 0 Mvmt Flow 204 435 31 29 460 64 1 8 5 7 8 55 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 524 0 0 466 0 0 1441 1441 451 1415 1424 492 Stage 1 - - - - - - 859 859 - 550 550 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 582 582 - 865 874 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.27 6.64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.27 5.64 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.27 5.64 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.653 4.126 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1053 - - 1106 - - 111 134 613 107 128 581 Stage 1 - - - - - - 354 376 - 493 497 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 502 502 - 328 351 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1053 - - 1106 - - 79 105 613 83 100 581 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 79 105 - 83 100 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 285 303 - 397 484 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 435 489 - 255 283 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.4 33.6 20.8 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 140 1053 - - 1106 - - 91 581 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.102 0.193 - - 0.026 - - 0.17 0.094 HCM Control Delay (s) 33.6 9.2 - - 8.3 - - 52.5 11.8 HCM Lane LOS D A - - A - - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.7 - - 0.1 - - 0.6 0.3 616 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 AM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 566 14 399 85 327 56 101 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.70 0.04 0.58 0.19 0.71 0.17 0.26 Control Delay 12.0 25.2 12.1 25.2 14.8 33.0 14.8 22.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.0 25.2 12.1 25.2 14.8 33.0 14.8 22.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 197 3 154 22 125 14 31 Queue Length 95th (ft) 33 #524 14 #328 54 244 39 76 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 1296 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 467 806 420 713 469 678 371 653 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.70 0.03 0.56 0.18 0.48 0.15 0.15 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 617 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 AM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 481 57 13 310 69 81 236 75 53 78 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 481 57 13 310 69 81 236 75 53 78 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1709 1736 1723 1723 1709 1723 1641 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 48 506 60 14 326 73 85 248 79 56 82 19 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 3 2 8 0 Cap, veh/h 351 592 70 227 489 110 467 318 101 274 310 72 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1535 182 1667 1352 303 1641 1252 399 1641 1289 299 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 48 0 566 14 0 399 85 0 327 56 0 101 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 0 1717 1667 0 1655 1641 0 1651 1641 0 1587 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 16.5 0.3 0.0 11.1 2.1 0.0 10.0 1.4 0.0 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 16.5 0.3 0.0 11.1 2.1 0.0 10.0 1.4 0.0 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.19 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 351 0 662 227 0 599 467 0 419 274 0 382 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.00 0.85 0.06 0.00 0.67 0.18 0.00 0.78 0.20 0.00 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 560 0 894 479 0 862 647 0 817 476 0 786 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.2 0.0 15.3 12.9 0.0 14.6 14.3 0.0 18.9 15.4 0.0 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 6.2 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 3.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 6.4 0.1 0.0 3.7 0.7 0.0 3.9 0.5 0.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.4 0.0 21.5 13.0 0.0 15.9 14.5 0.0 22.1 15.7 0.0 17.2 LnGrp LOS B A C B A B B A C B A B Approach Vol, veh/h 614 413 412 157 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.7 15.8 20.6 16.7 Approach LOS C B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 3.8 26.6 6.0 18.1 5.1 25.3 5.3 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 28.4 9.0 27.0 9.0 28.4 9.0 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 18.5 4.1 4.8 3.0 13.1 3.4 12.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.5 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.0 HCM 6th LOS B 618 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 12/16/2022 AM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 279 38 118 369 172 78 279 133 94 175 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.49 0.05 0.24 0.58 0.28 0.18 0.71 0.34 0.25 0.38 Control Delay 14.1 29.7 3.8 14.5 30.4 9.8 17.7 43.4 16.9 18.5 27.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.1 29.7 3.8 14.5 30.4 9.8 17.7 43.4 16.9 18.5 27.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 124 0 33 171 18 28 151 27 34 74 Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 245 14 78 324 74 56 248 77 65 138 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1326 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 Base Capacity (vph) 757 645 1242 760 639 616 716 652 597 705 619 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.43 0.03 0.16 0.58 0.28 0.11 0.43 0.22 0.13 0.28 Intersection Summary 619 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 12/16/2022 AM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 61 248 34 105 328 153 69 248 118 84 85 70 Future Volume (veh/h) 61 248 34 105 328 153 69 248 118 84 85 70 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1736 1750 1723 1723 1709 1709 1750 1736 1723 1736 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 69 279 38 118 369 0 78 279 133 94 96 79 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 1 0 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 1 0 Cap, veh/h 316 436 484 394 466 411 388 326 344 201 166 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.27 0.00 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1736 1483 1641 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 881 725 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 69 279 38 118 369 0 78 279 133 94 0 175 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1736 1483 1641 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 0 1606 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 8.1 1.0 2.9 11.2 0.0 2.0 8.3 4.4 2.4 0.0 5.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 8.1 1.0 2.9 11.2 0.0 2.0 8.3 4.4 2.4 0.0 5.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 316 436 484 394 466 411 388 326 344 0 367 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.64 0.08 0.30 0.79 0.19 0.72 0.41 0.27 0.00 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1279 1017 980 1325 1009 1358 1025 862 1287 0 941 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.5 18.8 13.1 13.8 19.1 0.0 14.9 20.3 18.8 15.1 0.0 18.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.6 0.1 0.4 3.1 0.0 0.2 2.5 0.8 0.4 0.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 3.0 0.3 1.0 4.3 0.0 0.7 3.4 1.5 0.9 0.0 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.8 20.4 13.2 14.2 22.1 0.0 15.1 22.8 19.6 15.6 0.0 19.8 LnGrp LOS B C B B C B C B B A B Approach Vol, veh/h 386 487 490 269 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.7 20.2 20.7 18.3 Approach LOS B C C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 21.2 7.2 19.9 7.0 22.2 7.6 19.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 10.1 4.0 7.3 3.7 13.2 4.4 10.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.7 0.2 1.1 0.2 2.1 0.3 2.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.7 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 620 Queues 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 PM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 19 16 209 10 497 10 399 173 399 493 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.05 0.04 0.78 0.03 0.75 0.02 0.23 0.20 0.55 0.21 Control Delay 39.7 34.8 0.2 63.6 33.9 29.4 9.0 18.5 4.1 10.3 8.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.7 34.8 0.2 63.6 33.9 29.4 9.0 18.5 4.1 10.3 8.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 43 12 0 154 6 260 2 83 0 100 60 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 30 0 221 19 286 9 157 46 193 134 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 433 589 560 439 589 876 591 1744 855 857 2314 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.03 0.03 0.48 0.02 0.57 0.02 0.23 0.20 0.47 0.21 Intersection Summary 621 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 PM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 61 18 15 194 9 462 9 371 161 371 453 6 Future Volume (veh/h) 61 18 15 194 9 462 9 371 161 371 453 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 66 19 16 209 10 497 10 399 173 399 487 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 328 533 452 474 533 673 475 1431 633 615 1921 24 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.43 0.43 0.15 0.57 0.57 Sat Flow, veh/h 892 1750 1483 1395 1750 1471 1667 3325 1471 1667 3364 41 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 66 19 16 209 10 497 10 399 173 399 241 252 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 892 1750 1483 1395 1750 1471 1667 1663 1471 1667 1663 1743 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.7 0.9 0.9 14.9 0.5 33.2 0.4 9.3 9.1 15.1 8.7 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.2 0.9 0.9 15.8 0.5 33.2 0.4 9.3 9.1 15.1 8.7 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 328 533 452 474 533 673 475 1431 633 615 949 995 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.44 0.02 0.74 0.02 0.28 0.27 0.65 0.25 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 357 589 499 519 589 720 608 1431 633 889 949 995 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.7 29.3 29.3 34.9 29.2 26.7 18.8 22.1 22.1 13.7 12.9 12.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.5 1.1 1.2 0.6 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.4 0.3 5.1 0.2 12.0 0.2 3.6 3.3 5.4 3.3 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.0 29.4 29.4 35.5 29.2 30.5 18.8 22.6 23.1 14.8 13.6 13.5 LnGrp LOS C C C D C C B C C B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 101 716 582 892 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.1 31.9 22.7 14.1 Approach LOS C C C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.3 56.5 41.2 5.4 73.4 41.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 28.1 40.4 11.0 55.1 40.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.1 11.3 9.2 2.4 10.7 35.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 2.8 0.5 0.0 2.9 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.6 HCM 6th LOS C 622 HCM 6th TWSC 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 12/16/2022 PM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 67 551 5 6 430 15 6 6 37 26 6 186 Future Vol, veh/h 67 551 5 6 430 15 6 6 37 26 6 186 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 130 - - - - - - - 115 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 72 592 5 6 462 16 6 6 40 28 6 200 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 478 0 0 597 0 0 1324 1229 595 1244 1223 470 Stage 1 - - - - - - 739 739 - 482 482 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 585 490 - 762 741 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1095 - - 989 - - 134 179 508 152 181 598 Stage 1 - - - - - - 412 427 - 569 557 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 501 552 - 400 426 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1095 - - 989 - - 82 166 508 129 168 598 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 82 166 - 129 168 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 385 399 - 531 554 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 328 549 - 339 398 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 0.1 21.6 17.9 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 269 1095 - - 989 - - 135 598 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 0.066 - - 0.007 - - 0.255 0.334 HCM Control Delay (s) 21.6 8.5 - - 8.7 - - 40.6 14 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - E B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.2 - - 0 - - 1 1.5 623 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 PM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 504 63 571 112 220 140 246 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.69 0.16 0.79 0.31 0.59 0.36 0.65 Control Delay 11.2 27.4 11.0 31.8 17.4 31.1 18.0 33.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.2 27.4 11.0 31.8 17.4 31.1 18.0 33.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 203 13 241 34 87 44 100 Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 #436 37 #518 69 158 83 178 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 1296 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 389 731 434 726 385 688 400 688 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.69 0.15 0.79 0.29 0.32 0.35 0.36 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 624 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 12/16/2022 PM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 55 429 65 62 429 130 110 160 56 137 178 63 Future Volume (veh/h) 55 429 65 62 429 130 110 160 56 137 178 63 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 438 66 63 438 133 112 163 57 140 182 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 263 577 87 323 505 153 321 224 78 348 245 86 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 1486 224 1667 1288 391 1667 1239 433 1667 1237 435 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 0 504 63 0 571 112 0 220 140 0 246 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 0 1710 1667 0 1680 1667 0 1672 1667 0 1672 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 14.4 1.3 0.0 17.7 3.0 0.0 7.0 3.8 0.0 7.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 14.4 1.3 0.0 17.7 3.0 0.0 7.0 3.8 0.0 7.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.26 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 263 0 664 323 0 658 321 0 302 348 0 331 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.76 0.20 0.00 0.87 0.35 0.00 0.73 0.40 0.00 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 460 0 860 514 0 844 462 0 799 460 0 799 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.4 0.0 15.0 11.4 0.0 15.8 17.2 0.0 21.8 16.8 0.0 21.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 2.9 0.3 0.0 7.8 0.6 0.0 3.4 0.7 0.0 3.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 5.2 0.4 0.0 7.0 1.1 0.0 2.9 1.4 0.0 3.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.8 0.0 17.9 11.7 0.0 23.7 17.9 0.0 25.2 17.5 0.0 24.6 LnGrp LOS B A B B A C B A C B A C Approach Vol, veh/h 560 634 332 386 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.4 22.5 22.7 22.0 Approach LOS B C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.5 27.6 7.2 16.2 5.3 27.7 8.2 15.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 28.4 9.0 27.0 9.0 28.4 9.0 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 16.4 5.0 9.8 3.1 19.7 5.8 9.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.1 1.3 0.0 2.4 0.1 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.9 HCM 6th LOS C 625 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 12/16/2022 PM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 434 66 132 336 109 62 142 80 136 251 v/c Ratio 0.28 0.66 0.08 0.30 0.53 0.18 0.18 0.51 0.26 0.30 0.65 Control Delay 12.2 31.4 4.8 12.7 28.0 8.8 20.0 42.1 10.6 21.3 39.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.2 31.4 4.8 12.7 28.0 8.8 20.0 42.1 10.6 21.3 39.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 198 2 33 146 8 22 73 0 51 124 Queue Length 95th (ft) 84 #381 26 76 284 50 51 143 39 98 222 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1326 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 Base Capacity (vph) 807 655 1303 784 652 608 694 646 605 706 630 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.66 0.05 0.17 0.52 0.18 0.09 0.22 0.13 0.19 0.40 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 626 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 12/16/2022 PM Peak Kagy Boulevard 9:15 am 10/13/2022 Existing Conditions (2022)Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 134 395 60 120 306 99 56 129 73 124 157 71 Future Volume (veh/h) 134 395 60 120 306 99 56 129 73 124 157 71 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1723 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 147 434 66 132 336 0 62 142 80 136 173 78 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 422 536 550 342 532 295 284 243 398 231 104 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.30 0.00 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1142 515 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 147 434 66 132 336 0 62 142 80 136 0 251 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 0 1657 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 13.6 1.7 3.1 9.8 0.0 1.8 4.4 2.8 3.8 0.0 8.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 13.6 1.7 3.1 9.8 0.0 1.8 4.4 2.8 3.8 0.0 8.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 422 536 550 342 532 295 284 243 398 0 335 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.81 0.12 0.39 0.63 0.21 0.50 0.33 0.34 0.00 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1307 973 921 1231 973 1212 966 825 1265 0 922 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.8 19.0 12.3 13.6 17.8 0.0 18.7 22.6 21.9 16.7 0.0 22.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 3.0 0.1 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.4 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.0 3.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 5.2 0.5 1.1 3.7 0.0 0.7 1.8 1.0 1.4 0.0 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.3 22.0 12.4 14.3 19.0 0.0 19.1 24.0 22.7 17.2 0.0 25.6 LnGrp LOS B C B B B B C C B A C Approach Vol, veh/h 647 468 284 387 Approach Delay, s/veh 19.0 17.7 22.5 22.7 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.3 25.2 6.8 19.0 8.5 25.0 9.1 16.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 37.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 15.6 3.8 10.5 5.5 11.8 5.8 6.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 2.6 0.2 1.5 0.4 1.9 0.4 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 627 APPENDIX C– SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS 628 Existing Volumes (2022) Design Year (2045) x x x x -- -- x x x x -- -- Yes No Kagy Boulevard & South 7th Avenue Kagy Boulevard & South 7th Avenue 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 7. Crash History 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Signal Warranted TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 629 Sanderson Stewart 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022) Hour Begin NB SB EB WB 0:00 1 18 20 15 35 18 1:00 0 5 7 9 16 5 2:00 0 2 4 4 8 2 3:00 0 1 3 4 7 1 4:00 1 2 5 8 13 2 5:00 3 9 62 49 111 9 6:00 5 19 147 151 298 19 7:00 19 42 476 368 844 42 8:00 14 72 528 449 977 72 9:00 21 81 457 359 816 81 10:00 17 122 421 334 755 122 11:00 23 100 447 383 830 100 12:00 26 162 455 404 859 162 13:00 28 138 492 362 854 138 14:00 32 147 485 363 848 147 15:00 32 179 515 420 935 179 16:00 37 181 601 433 1034 181 17:00 48 197 602 464 1066 197 18:00 15 133 420 330 750 133 19:00 14 108 280 255 535 108 20:00 7 77 232 179 411 77 21:00 3 48 137 114 251 48 22:00 5 39 70 72 142 39 23:00 2 18 33 36 69 18 TOTAL 353 1900 6899 5565 12464 1900 Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns): No (0 hrs) Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns): Yes (9 hrs) Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns): No (4 hrs) Yes (10 hrs) Warrant 1 Satisfied?Yes Major Street Total > 500 and Higher Minor Street Total > 200 for 8 hours? Major Street Total > 750 and Higher Minor Street Total > 100 for 8 hours? Major Street Total > 400 and Higher Minor Street Total > 160 for 8 hours? Major Street Total > 600 and Higher Minor Street Total > 80 for 8 hours? Higher Volume Minor Approach Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Avg. Entering Volume Major Street Total (Both Approaches) Project Description: Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: 12/28/2022 630 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2045) Hour Begin NB SB EB WB 0:00 1 24 37 31 68 24 1:00 0 7 13 18 31 7 2:00 0 3 7 8 15 3 3:00 0 1 6 8 14 1 4:00 1 3 9 16 25 3 5:00 3 12 114 100 214 12 6:00 5 26 271 309 580 26 7:00 19 56 878 754 1632 56 8:00 14 97 974 920 1894 97 9:00 21 109 843 735 1578 109 10:00 17 164 777 684 1461 164 11:00 23 134 825 784 1609 134 12:00 26 218 840 827 1667 218 13:00 28 185 908 741 1649 185 14:00 32 197 895 743 1638 197 15:00 32 240 950 860 1810 240 16:00 37 243 1109 887 1996 243 17:00 48 265 1111 950 2061 265 18:00 15 179 775 676 1451 179 19:00 14 145 517 522 1039 145 20:00 7 103 428 367 795 103 21:00 3 64 253 233 486 64 22:00 5 52 129 147 276 52 23:00 2 24 61 74 135 24 TOTAL 353 2551 12730 11394 24124 2551 Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (100% Columns): No (4 hrs) Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (100% Columns): Yes (12 hrs) Combination of Conditions A & B (80% Columns): Yes (8 hrs) Yes (13 hrs) Warrant 1 Satisfied?Yes Major Street Total > 500 and Higher Minor Street Total > 200 for 8 hours? Major Street Total > 750 and Higher Minor Street Total > 100 for 8 hours? Major Street Total > 400 and Higher Minor Street Total > 160 for 8 hours? Major Street Total > 600 and Higher Minor Street Total > 80 for 8 hours? Higher Volume Minor Approach Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Avg. Entering Volume Major Street Total (Both Approaches) Project Description: Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: 631 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022) Hour Begin NB SB EB WB 0:00 1 18 20 15 35 18 1:00 0 5 7 9 16 5 2:00 0 2 4 4 8 2 3:00 0 1 3 4 7 1 4:00 1 2 5 8 13 2 5:00 3 9 62 49 111 9 6:00 5 19 147 151 298 19 7:00 19 42 476 368 844 42 8:00 14 72 528 449 977 72 9:00 21 81 457 359 816 81 10:00 17 122 421 334 755 122 11:00 23 100 447 383 830 100 12:00 26 162 455 404 859 162 13:00 28 138 492 362 854 138 14:00 32 147 485 363 848 147 15:00 32 179 515 420 935 179 16:00 37 181 601 433 1034 181 17:00 48 197 602 464 1066 197 18:00 15 133 420 330 750 133 19:00 14 108 280 255 535 108 20:00 7 77 232 179 411 77 21:00 3 48 137 114 251 48 22:00 5 39 70 72 142 39 23:00 2 18 33 36 69 18 TOTAL 353 1900 6899 5565 12464 1900 Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of 4 hours (100% thresholds)?No (3 hrs) Warrant 2 Satisfied?No Higher Volume Minor Approach Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Avg. Entering Volume Major Street Total (Both Approaches) Project Description: Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: 632 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2045) Hour Begin NB SB EB WB 0:00 1 24 37 31 68 24 1:00 0 7 13 18 31 7 2:00 0 3 7 8 15 3 3:00 0 1 6 8 14 1 4:00 1 3 9 16 25 3 5:00 3 12 114 100 214 12 6:00 5 26 271 309 580 26 7:00 19 56 878 754 1632 56 8:00 14 97 974 920 1894 97 9:00 21 109 843 735 1578 109 10:00 17 164 777 684 1461 164 11:00 23 134 825 784 1609 134 12:00 26 218 840 827 1667 218 13:00 28 185 908 741 1649 185 14:00 32 197 895 743 1638 197 15:00 32 240 950 860 1810 240 16:00 37 243 1109 887 1996 243 17:00 48 265 1111 950 2061 265 18:00 15 179 775 676 1451 179 19:00 14 145 517 522 1039 145 20:00 7 103 428 367 795 103 21:00 3 64 253 233 486 64 22:00 5 52 129 147 276 52 23:00 2 24 61 74 135 24 TOTAL 353 2551 12730 11394 24124 2551 Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of 4 hours (100% thresholds)?Yes (10 hrs) Warrant 2 Satisfied?Yes Higher Volume Minor Approach Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Avg. Entering Volume Major Street Total (Both Approaches) Project Description: Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: 633 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022) Category A:Peak Period: PM Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 5 veh-hrs?No (1.08) High minor approach volume > 150 for peak hour?Yes (218) Total entering volume > 800 for peak hour?Yes (1341) Category A warrant satisfied?No Category B: Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (100% thresholds)?No Warrant 3 Satisfied?No Warrant 3: Peak Hour General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): AM Peak Hour 7:45 - 8:45 AM High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.34 Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 1026 High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 59 Total Entering Volume (vehs) 1097 High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 218 Total Entering Volume (vehs) 1341 PM Peak Hour 5:00 - 6:00 PM High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 1.08 Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 1074 634 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2045) Category A:Peak Period: PM Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 5 veh-hrs?Yes (12.60) High minor approach volume > 150 for peak hour?Yes (261) Total entering volume > 800 for peak hour?Yes (2290) Category A warrant satisfied?Yes Category B: Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (100% thresholds)?Yes Warrant 3 Satisfied?Yes Warrant 3: Peak Hour General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): AM Peak Hour 7:45 - 8:45 AM High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 13.44 Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 2081 High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 111 Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 2204 High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) Total Entering Volume (vehs) Total Entering Volume (vehs) PM Peak Hour High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 2290 261 1980 12.60 5:00 - 6:00 PM 635 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022) This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street. Hour Begin 0:00 35 0 1:00 16 0 2:00 8 0 3:00 7 0 4:00 13 0 5:00 111 3 6:00 298 2 7:00 844 29 8:00 977 51 9:00 816 23 10:00 755 24 11:00 830 54 12:00 859 22 13:00 854 33 14:00 848 28 15:00 935 30 16:00 1034 41 17:00 1066 33 18:00 750 32 19:00 535 9 For each of any 4 hours of an average day, do the plotted points representing 20:00 411 3 representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding 21:00 251 3 pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in 22:00 142 0 Figure 4C-5?No 23:00 69 1 TOTAL 12,464 421 For 1 hour of an average day, does the plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in Figure 4C-7?No Warrant 4 Satisfied?No Pedestrian Volume Crossing Major Street Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Major Street Total Traffic 636 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022) This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street. Hour Begin 0:00 35 0 1:00 16 0 2:00 8 0 3:00 7 0 4:00 13 0 5:00 111 6 6:00 298 4 7:00 844 55 8:00 977 75 9:00 816 43 10:00 755 45 11:00 830 102 12:00 859 41 13:00 854 62 14:00 848 53 15:00 935 56 16:00 1034 77 17:00 1066 83 18:00 750 60 19:00 535 17 For each of any 4 hours of an average day, do the plotted points representing 20:00 411 6 representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding 21:00 251 6 pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in 22:00 142 0 Figure 4C-5?No 23:00 69 2 TOTAL 12,464 792 For 1 hour of an average day, does the plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in Figure 4C-7?No Warrant 4 Satisfied?No Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Major Street Total Traffic Pedestrian Volume Crossing Major Street Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: 637 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022) This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period?N/A Do 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour?N/A Warrant 5 Satisfied?N/A Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of platooning and/or progressive operation?No Warrant 6 Satisfied?No This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to consider installing a traffic control signal Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency?N/A Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month period?No Is Condition A criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?No Is Condition B criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?Yes Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4? No Warrant 7 Satisfied?No Jurisdiction: Warrant 7: Crash Experience Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Warrant 5: School Crossing Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system. General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: 638 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2045) This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period?N/A Do 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour?N/A Warrant 5 Satisfied?N/A Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of platooning and/or progressive operation?No Warrant 6 Satisfied?No This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to consider installing a traffic control signal Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency?N/A Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month period?No Is Condition A criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?Yes Is Condition B criterion met for 80% columns of Warrant 1 met?Yes Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4? No Warrant 7 Satisfied?No Jurisdiction: Warrant 7: Crash Experience Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Warrant 5: School Crossing Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system. General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: 639 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2022) This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal could be justified in order to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network Do two or more of the intersecting routes at this location have at least one of the following characteristics: A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow; or B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or C. It appears as a major route on an official plan. Yes Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of a least 1000 vehicles during a weekday typical peak hour and have a 5-year projected traffic volume that meets one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday?Yes Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of at least 1000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday?N/A Warrant 8 Satisfied?Yes This warrant is intended for application where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign whereby the center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop or yield line? No During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 (whichever is applicable) for the existing combination of approach lanes over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance?N/A Warrant 9 Satisfied?N/A Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Warrant 8: Roadway Network Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Jurisdiction: General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: 640 Sanderson Stewart 12/28/2022 15060.01 Kagy Blvd - S 19th to Willson City of Bozeman/MDT 35 mph Kagy Blvd (1 lane) S 7th Ave (2 lanes) Analysis Year/Case: Design Year (2045) This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal could be justified in order to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network Do two or more of the intersecting routes at this location have at least one of the following characteristics: A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow; or B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or C. It appears as a major route on an official plan. Yes Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of a least 1000 vehicles during a weekday typical peak hour and have a 5-year projected traffic volume that meets one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday?Yes Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of at least 1000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday?N/A Warrant 8 Satisfied?Yes This warrant is intended for application where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign whereby the center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop or yield line? No During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 (whichever is applicable) for the existing combination of approach lanes over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance?N/A Warrant 9 Satisfied?N/A General Information Agency/Company: Date: Project Number: Project Description: Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Jurisdiction: Major Street Speed Limit: Major Street (Approach Lanes): Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Warrant 8: Roadway Network 641 APPENDIX D – VOLUME PROJECTIONS MEMO 642 MEMORANDUM To: Joey Renenger, MDT Consultant Design CC: Jason Senn, MDT Consultant Design Nick Ross, City of Bozeman Taylor Lonsdale, City of Bozeman From: Tessa Wermers, Sanderson Stewart Joey Staszcuk, Sanderson Stewart Date: 12/20/2022 Reference: UPN 8931000; Kagy Blvd S. 19th to Willson – Traffic Volume Projections The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a summary of the traffic volume projections prepared by Sanderson Stewart for the Kagy Blvd S. 19th to Willson project. We would like to obtain concurrence from both MDT and the City of Bozeman before proceeding with various design tasks that are dependent on these projections. Existing Traffic Volumes Sanderson Stewart completed the initial traffic data collection effort for this project in April 2015 under the MDT Traffic Engineering Term Contract. The traffic data was collected prior to graduation to ensure Montana State University’s classes would still be in session. During the fall 2015 semester, the City of Bozeman expressed concerns about traffic operations (queuing in particular) for the South 11th Avenue and Kagy Boulevard intersection and asked Sanderson Stewart to evaluate that intersection. It was presumed that the new student housing complex recently constructed in the southwest corner of the intersection had led to the breakdown in operations. Peak hour counts were collected at the intersection in September 2015 to evaluate the impacts of the new student housing complex. The September 2015 counts showed a greater than 20% increase in peak hour intersection entering volumes and up to 12 times the number of bikes and pedestrians as compared to the April 2015 counts. In order to further investigate that variation in the traffic counts for the purposes of the Kagy Boulevard project, MDT subsequently approved an amendment to recount the major intersections along the corridor. The additional counts at the four main intersections were completed in October 2015. ADT counts were not processed at the Kagy Boulevard/South 19th Avenue intersection in April of 2015, nor at the Kagy Boulevard/South Willson Avenue intersection in the Fall 2015 counts. Current traffic data was collected by Sanderson Stewart in April 2022 in support of the restarted project. Significant changes to traffic patterns have occurred in the study area since the 2015 analysis due to several recent developments in proximity to Kagy Boulevard, the connection of South 11th Avenue to Graf Street, and the extension of Graf Street to South 19th Avenue. The 2022 traffic volumes are shown in the attached Figure 1. 643 December 20, 2022 2 Future Traffic Volume Projections Sanderson Stewart completed a review of existing proposals for known developments that may impact the Kagy Boulevard corridor, as well as considering potential development for other properties that are currently undeveloped. Traffic projections calculated in 2015 were based on 13 properties east of South 19th Avenue and restricted to a 1-mile radius from Kagy Boulevard. Most of those properties remain partially or fully undeveloped today, with the exception of South Towne Square and the new parking garage at MSU. The 2015 analysis resulted in annual growth rates (AGRs) ranging from 2.59% to 3.47% on Kagy Boulevard. In this 2022 analysis, a larger radius was reviewed extending south to Goldenstein Lane and west to Fowler Lane, resulting in 32 properties to be evaluated. These 32 parcels are highlighted in the attached development figure (Figure 2) and are also summarized in the attached Table 1. Table 1 provides specific development information including the planned or assumed land uses, number of units, and resulting weekday, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trip generation. The trip generation calculations include reductions for internal capture trips within each development where applicable, as well as reductions for pass-by and multi- modal (bicycle/pedestrian/transit) trips. A general 10% multi-modal reduction was applied to all residential trips (based on data provided in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Master Plan) with 50% applied to residential developments closest to the MSU campus (based on an ITE study of the Stadium View Apartments south of Kagy Boulevard and 11th Avenue). All projected developments were assumed to be 100% built out for the Design Year of 2045. All of the projected developments combined result in approximately 9,935 additional dwelling units on the south side of Bozeman. Assuming an average of 2 persons per dwelling unit, this equates to a population increase of 19,870 people. If Bozeman’s historic population growth rate of 3.6% over the past 10 years continues for the next 20 years, the developments assumed for this analysis would represent 36% of new residents citywide. Assuming full occupancy, 18% of the total future City population would reside in these new developments. It should be noted that the rates used for number of persons per household and the historic growth rate for Bozeman are based on U.S. Census data. New trips generated by the 32 assumed area developments were assigned to the Kagy Boulevard corridor based on assignments provided in available traffic impact studies and assumed traffic patterns after construction of the future anticipated roadway extensions described below. For developments with direct access to Graf Street, West Arnold Street, and Stucky Road, a percentage of trips were assumed to utilize those connections for east/west travel rather than Kagy Boulevard, particularly between South 19th Avenue and South 11th Avenue. For example, trips from the developments west of South 19th Avenue and south of Stucky Road were assigned assuming 25% of trips would travel on Graf Street east of South 19th Avenue, with 10% then traveling north on South 11th Avenue and 15% continuing east. In addition to the completed Graf Street and South 11th Avenue extensions, Stucky Road is also under construction to extend east of South 19th Avenue to connect to South 11th Avenue. West Arnold Street is also anticipated to be extended to South 19th Avenue to provide connectivity for multiple anticipated developments. Additionally, Fowler Lane was assumed to be constructed 644 December 20, 2022 3 between Stucky Road and West Garfield Street for the purposes of this analysis. Twenty percent of the future northbound/southbound through volumes on Kagy Boulevard at South 19th Avenue were removed for this planned roadway connection based on roadway capacity described in the Bozeman Transportation Master Plan. The combination of existing traffic and 100% buildout of all the area developments shown in Figure 2 results in the future traffic volume projections shown in the attached Figure 3. Chart 1 on page 4 provides a graphic summary of all the average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes collected by MDT and Sanderson Stewart for comparison. It also shows Sanderson Stewart’s previous 2037 projections from 2015 and the updated 2045 volume projections based on the methodology outlined above. This methodology results in AADTs ranging from 21,300 vpd east of South 19th Avenue to 27,300 east of South Willson Avenue. The resulting annual growth rates range from 2.00% to 3.94%, with an average of 3.0%. In the 2015 analysis, the average growth rate was 2.8%, with 2037 AADTs ranging from 24,700 vpd to 27,200. Bozeman’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) projected 2040 AADTs of only up to 18,000 vpd on Kagy Boulevard between South 19th Avenue and Highland Boulevard. This smaller AADT could be due to a much lower density assumed for some parcels such as Blackwood Groves, which is now anticipated to be zoned Residential Emphasis Mixed-Use (REMU) instead of the general residential assumed in the TMP. The TMP also assumed full buildout of the Visionary Major Street Network, which includes full connections of Kagy Boulevard, Graf Street, Blackwood Road, and Goldenstein Lane between South 3rd Avenue and Cottonwood Road. South 27th Avenue was also assumed to connect from West Garfield Street south to Johnson Road. These additional connections would likely pull traffic away from Kagy Boulevard, especially for developments to the south. 645 December 20, 2022 4 Chart 1: AADT Summary 646 Table 1: Development Summary Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit 1 Yellowstone Theological Institute Junior/Community College, Church, 296 Dwelling Units, 31,500 SF Retail, 10,000 SF Restaurant 3145 1574 1571 247 123 124 276 156 120 Based on 2015 TIS & South 40 TIS 2 Allison Annex 132 Single-Family Lots 1121 561 560 83 22 61 111 70 41 Assumed density based on Allison Subdivision 3 Allison Subdivision 396 Dwelling Units 1969 985 984 139 40 99 175 106 69 Density based on 2019 Phase 4 TIS 4 South University District 570 Dwelling Units, 654 Student Bedrooms, 50,000 SF Commercial 4774 2387 2387 211 71 140 357 192 165 Based on 2016 Block 5 TIS and 2022 Blocks 2, 3, and 4 TIS 5 COS 2661A 100 Dwelling Units, 52,000 SF Office 692 346 346 71 51 20 72 23 49 Assumed density based on Stadium Center and Homestead at Buffalo Run 6 Boylan Addition 49 Dwelling Units 164 82 82 9 2 7 12 8 4 Assumed density based on Homestead at Buffalo Run 7 Kiefer Property 69 Single-Family Lots 325 163 162 24 6 18 32 20 12 Assumed density based on Allison Annex 8 MOR Commercial Lot 12,000 SF Commercial 431 216 215 18 11 7 52 26 26 Assumed land use/density based on South Towne Square 9 Bozeman Health Sub-Area Hospital expansion, 1444 DUs, 833,035 SF commercial 17342 8648 8694 2368 1340 1029 1067 453 613 Assumed density based on 2005 subarea study 10 Zimmer-Nash Property 102 Single-Family Lots 866 433 433 64 16 48 86 54 32 Assumed density based on Ridge Trail Subdivision 11 Burkhart Property 34 Single-Family Lots 289 145 144 21 5 16 29 18 11 Based on 2021 concept plan 12 Everhome 113-Room Hotel 903 451 452 52 29 23 67 34 33 Based on 2020 Development Review Application 13 P4 Apartments 206 Dwelling Units 1250 625 625 74 18 56 94 59 35 Based on 2020 Development Review Application 14 MSU Innovation Campus 102,000 SF Office/Research Center, 200-employee Research Center 2152 1076 1076 215 183 32 207 30 177 Based on 2022 Trip Generation Letter 15 Annex of Bozeman 122 Dwelling Units 450 226 224 26 7 19 36 22 14 Based on 2019 TIS 16 West Kagy Student Housing 167 Dwelling Units 562 281 281 33 8 25 42 27 15 Based on 2022 Development Review Application 17 Yellowstone Montessori Annex 2 Dwelling Units, 2,300 SF Commercial 93 47 46 4 2 2 12 6 6 Based on 2022 Development Review Application 18 West University Properties Annexation 20,000 SF Rec Center, 939 Dwelling Units, 330,000 SF Commercial/Office 8868 4440 4428 707 431 276 848 370 478 Based on 2022 Developer Information 19 University Crossing 59 Dwelling Units 198 99 99 12 3 9 14 9 5 Based on 2020 Development Review Application 20 Kagy Boulevard Fire Station #2 12,000 SF Fire Station 10 5 5 0 0 0 2 1 1 Based on 2022 TIA 21 Nexus Point 240 Dwelling Units, 16,000 SF Office 1531 769 762 101 34 67 122 70 52 Based on 2019 TIS 22 Icon Apartments at 2131 Graf 460 Dwelling Units 2790 1395 1395 166 40 126 211 133 78 Based on 2019 TIS 23 Bennet Property 252 Dwelling Units, 230,000 SF Commercial 5733 2863 2870 513 284 229 387 209 178 Assumed density based on Blackwood Groves, 2020 Development Review Application proposing REMU 24 Gran Cielo Subdivision 230 Dwelling Units 1711 856 855 121 34 87 154 94 60 Based on 2019 Preliminary Plat 25 Gran Cielo II Annex 1156 Dwelling Units 7011 3506 3505 416 100 316 531 335 196 Assumed density based on Homestead at Buffalo Run 26 Homestead at Buffalo Run 288 Dwelling Units 1747 874 873 103 25 78 133 84 49 Based on 2020 TIS 27 Blackwood Groves 800 Dwelling Units, 730,000 SF Commercial 18211 9095 9116 1630 901 729 1229 664 565 Based on 2022 Developer Information 28 Sod fields 1029 Dwelling Units 6241 3121 3120 371 89 282 473 298 175 Assumed density based on Homestead at Buffalo Run 29 Derham 532 Dwelling Units, 485,000 SF Commercial 12111 6048 6062 1084 599 485 817 442 376 Assumed density based on 80% of Blackwood Groves 30 Bozeman Cohousing 43 Dwelling Units 365 183 182 27 7 20 35 22 13 Based on 2020 Development Review Application 31 New Elementary School site 400 Students 908 454 454 296 160 136 64 29 35 Based on size of other local Elementary Schools 32 Ridge Trail Subdivision 20 Single-Family Lots 170 85 85 13 4 9 17 11 6 Based on 2022 Preliminary Plat * Development numbers correspond to those shown in Figure 2. Development* Planned/Assumed Land Use Trip Generation Notes Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 647 648 W KAGY BLVDS WILLS O N A V E S 7TH AVE S 11TH AVE S 19TH AVE S 3RD AVE KAGY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MAPFIGURE 2W ARNOLD STGRAF STGOLDENSTEIN LNSTUCKY RDW GARFIELD STW COLLEGE STHUFFINE LNHIGHLAND BLVD HAGGERTY LNS 3RD AVE 649 650 APPENDIX E – DESIGN YEAR (2045) CAPACITY CALCULATIONS 651 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 50.8 D 15 53.6 D 14 WB 37.2 D 7 43.2 D 8 NB 66.0 E 25 48.5 D 18 SB 63.1 E 27 47.4 D 23 Intersection 57.8 E --47.7 D -- EB 52.9 D 14 52.3 D 13 WB 39.6 D 14 53.8 D 16 NB 38.3 D 22 33.9 C 15 SB 45.7 D 17 48.8 D 23 Intersection 43.1 D --46.7 D -- South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard 652 Queues 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 261 287 135 160 238 404 226 1089 284 528 1040 v/c Ratio 1.13 0.81 0.23 0.89 0.80 0.54 0.70 1.05 0.40 1.02 0.66 Control Delay 135.1 62.5 7.8 49.5 44.6 11.3 27.2 82.7 12.1 78.1 25.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 135.1 62.5 7.8 49.5 44.6 11.3 27.2 82.7 12.1 78.1 25.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~192 211 14 65 158 149 70 ~484 60 ~391 307 Queue Length 95th (ft) #361 304 54 m64 m163 m174 121 #618 132 #651 413 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 230 416 611 180 359 744 348 1035 703 520 1578 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.13 0.69 0.22 0.89 0.66 0.54 0.65 1.05 0.40 1.02 0.66 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 653 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 240 264 124 147 219 372 208 1002 261 486 746 211 Future Volume (veh/h) 240 264 124 147 219 372 208 1002 261 486 746 211 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1709 1750 1709 1709 1723 1750 1723 1750 1750 1723 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 261 287 135 160 238 404 226 1089 284 528 811 229 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 293 419 523 242 362 662 345 1039 545 463 1138 321 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 3273 1483 1667 2520 711 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 261 287 135 160 238 404 226 1089 284 528 527 513 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 1637 1483 1667 1637 1595 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.0 18.3 7.8 6.0 15.3 25.1 10.8 38.1 18.0 29.0 31.2 31.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.0 18.3 7.8 6.0 15.3 25.1 10.8 38.1 18.0 29.0 31.2 31.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 293 419 523 242 362 662 345 1039 545 463 739 720 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.69 0.26 0.66 0.66 0.61 0.66 1.05 0.52 1.14 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 293 419 523 242 362 662 360 1039 545 463 739 720 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.2 41.1 27.7 42.3 43.3 24.8 24.6 41.0 29.7 37.0 26.6 26.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 27.0 4.6 0.3 6.6 4.3 1.6 4.0 41.3 3.5 86.5 5.8 5.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.6 8.3 2.8 2.4 6.8 8.7 4.5 20.7 6.8 24.4 12.8 12.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.1 45.7 27.9 48.8 47.6 26.4 28.6 82.3 33.2 123.5 32.4 32.5 LnGrp LOS E D C D D C C F C F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 683 802 1599 1568 Approach Delay, s/veh 50.8 37.2 66.0 63.1 Approach LOS D D E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.0 43.0 10.0 34.0 16.9 59.1 14.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.0 38.1 6.0 29.4 14.0 53.1 10.0 25.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 31.0 40.1 8.0 20.3 12.8 33.2 12.0 27.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.1 6.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 57.8 HCM 6th LOS E 654 Queues 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 286 259 180 249 266 526 146 829 204 479 1280 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.67 0.32 0.88 0.83 0.68 0.72 0.91 0.29 0.94 0.84 Control Delay 86.8 51.6 15.4 34.3 44.1 13.9 43.2 56.8 4.6 60.7 33.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 86.8 51.6 15.4 34.3 44.1 13.9 43.2 56.8 4.6 60.7 33.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~179 182 47 114 185 233 49 325 3 314 450 Queue Length 95th (ft) #330 269 104 m100 m162 m192 #144 #438 50 #550 555 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 287 431 562 283 367 772 205 922 711 510 1532 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.60 0.32 0.88 0.72 0.68 0.71 0.90 0.29 0.94 0.84 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 655 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 263 238 166 229 245 484 134 763 188 441 970 208 Future Volume (veh/h) 263 238 166 229 245 484 134 763 188 441 970 208 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 286 259 180 249 266 526 146 829 204 479 1054 226 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 298 432 477 305 368 677 231 923 526 497 1233 263 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.25 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 3325 1471 1667 2725 582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 286 259 180 249 266 526 146 829 204 479 641 639 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 1663 1471 1667 1663 1645 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.0 15.7 11.2 9.6 17.0 25.2 7.5 28.8 12.4 28.1 41.3 41.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.0 15.7 11.2 9.6 17.0 25.2 7.5 28.8 12.4 28.1 41.3 41.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 298 432 477 305 368 677 231 923 526 497 752 744 V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 0.60 0.38 0.82 0.72 0.78 0.63 0.90 0.39 0.96 0.85 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 298 432 477 305 368 677 231 923 526 497 752 744 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.4 40.0 31.4 40.8 44.2 27.2 30.2 41.7 28.8 32.6 29.3 29.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 41.0 2.3 0.5 15.7 6.9 5.7 5.5 13.4 2.2 31.0 11.8 12.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 7.1 4.1 4.2 8.0 13.3 3.3 13.2 4.6 17.7 18.0 18.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 77.4 42.3 31.9 56.5 51.1 32.9 35.7 55.1 30.9 63.6 41.0 41.6 LnGrp LOS E D C E D C D E C E D D Approach Vol, veh/h 725 1041 1179 1759 Approach Delay, s/veh 53.6 43.2 48.5 47.4 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 34.0 38.2 13.6 34.2 13.0 59.2 18.0 29.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 33.3 9.6 29.6 9.0 54.3 14.0 25.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 30.1 30.8 11.6 17.7 9.5 43.7 16.0 27.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 47.7 HCM 6th LOS D 656 Queues 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 261 287 135 160 238 404 226 1089 284 528 1040 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.83 0.23 0.68 0.74 0.65 0.75 0.87 0.35 0.91 0.71 Control Delay 78.3 67.1 6.1 34.6 46.5 18.6 32.1 43.9 11.2 70.0 29.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 78.3 67.1 6.1 34.6 46.5 18.6 32.1 43.9 11.2 70.0 29.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 158 213 4 52 193 219 78 411 70 210 335 Queue Length 95th (ft) #279 #349 46 m74 m239 333 #153 #538 131 #315 421 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 276 359 614 241 359 625 321 1249 823 578 1465 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.80 0.22 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.70 0.87 0.35 0.91 0.71 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 657 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 240 264 124 147 219 372 208 1002 261 486 746 211 Future Volume (veh/h) 240 264 124 147 219 372 208 1002 261 486 746 211 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1709 1750 1709 1709 1723 1750 1723 1750 1750 1723 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 261 287 135 160 238 404 226 1089 284 528 811 229 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 306 362 462 266 362 565 331 1230 693 566 1136 321 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 3273 1483 3233 2520 711 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 261 287 135 160 238 404 226 1089 284 528 527 513 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 1637 1483 1617 1637 1595 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 19.1 8.3 9.1 15.3 25.4 9.9 37.3 15.1 19.3 31.3 31.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 19.1 8.3 9.1 15.3 25.4 9.9 37.3 15.1 19.3 31.3 31.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 306 362 462 266 362 565 331 1230 693 566 738 719 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.79 0.29 0.60 0.66 0.72 0.68 0.89 0.41 0.93 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 306 362 462 266 362 565 359 1230 693 566 738 719 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 44.8 31.3 34.1 43.3 31.2 22.6 35.0 21.0 48.8 26.7 26.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.9 11.5 0.3 3.7 4.3 4.3 4.7 9.5 1.8 22.7 5.8 6.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 9.3 3.0 3.8 6.8 10.3 4.1 15.9 5.5 9.4 12.8 12.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.3 56.3 31.6 37.8 47.6 35.5 27.3 44.6 22.8 71.5 32.5 32.7 LnGrp LOS E E C D D D C D C E C C Approach Vol, veh/h 683 802 1599 1568 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.9 39.6 38.3 45.7 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 50.0 15.0 30.0 16.0 59.0 15.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.0 45.1 11.0 25.4 14.0 52.1 11.0 25.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.3 39.3 11.1 21.1 11.9 33.3 13.0 27.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.9 0.1 6.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.1 HCM 6th LOS D 658 Queues 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 286 259 180 249 266 526 146 829 204 479 1280 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.76 0.34 0.80 0.83 0.84 0.74 0.70 0.24 0.83 0.86 Control Delay 70.1 60.2 17.1 36.8 54.1 30.2 47.8 37.8 6.3 61.1 36.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 70.1 60.2 17.1 36.8 54.1 30.2 47.8 37.8 6.3 61.1 36.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 171 191 50 94 212 322 57 298 24 181 460 Queue Length 95th (ft) #320 283 111 m128 m250 m376 #171 374 67 #259 566 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 306 370 529 318 370 641 199 1181 839 601 1487 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.70 0.34 0.78 0.72 0.82 0.73 0.70 0.24 0.80 0.86 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 659 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 263 238 166 229 245 484 134 763 188 441 970 208 Future Volume (veh/h) 263 238 166 229 245 484 134 763 188 441 970 208 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 286 259 180 249 266 526 146 829 204 479 1054 226 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 313 370 420 340 370 556 221 1169 701 536 1215 260 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.17 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 3325 1471 3233 2725 582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 286 259 180 249 266 526 146 829 204 479 641 639 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 1663 1471 1617 1663 1645 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.0 16.4 11.9 14.0 17.0 25.4 6.6 25.8 10.1 17.4 41.8 42.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.0 16.4 11.9 14.0 17.0 25.4 6.6 25.8 10.1 17.4 41.8 42.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 313 370 420 340 370 556 221 1169 701 536 741 734 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.70 0.43 0.73 0.72 0.95 0.66 0.71 0.29 0.89 0.87 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 313 370 420 340 370 556 226 1169 701 593 741 734 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.7 43.8 35.1 32.6 44.0 36.2 27.7 33.6 19.1 49.0 30.0 30.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 29.6 5.7 0.7 7.8 6.6 25.6 6.8 3.7 1.0 15.0 12.9 13.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.3 7.8 4.3 6.3 7.9 18.4 3.0 10.7 3.6 8.0 18.5 18.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.3 49.5 35.8 40.4 50.5 61.7 34.4 37.3 20.1 64.0 42.9 43.5 LnGrp LOS E D D D D E C D C E D D Approach Vol, veh/h 725 1041 1179 1759 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.3 53.8 33.9 48.8 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.9 47.1 19.0 30.0 12.6 58.4 19.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 40.1 15.0 25.4 9.0 53.1 15.0 25.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.4 27.8 16.0 18.4 8.6 44.2 17.0 27.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 4.9 0.0 1.3 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 46.7 HCM 6th LOS D 660 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 259.8 F 45 186.3 F 40 WB 116.9 F 32 125.4 F 37 NB 304.5 F 57 248.8 F 43 SB 71.4 E 24 235.5 F 39 Intersection 208.5 F --194.2 F -- EB 115.2 F 22 96.5 F 20 WB 98.7 F 19 99.0 F 23 NB 192.6 F 53 111.0 F 38 SB 34.1 C 18 116.3 F 35 Intersection 123.3 F --105.1 F -- EB 58.2 E 16 86.7 F 20 WB 43.9 D 16 42.3 D 19 NB 48.8 D 30 71.0 E 21 SB 50.9 D 19 73.3 E 30 Intersection 50.4 D --66.6 E -- EB 367.1 F 157 278.8 F 124 WB 156.6 F 91 307.3 F 169 NB 358.2 F 186 213.1 F 111 SB 70.2 F 26 270.6 F 113 Intersection 264.6 F --269.3 F -- EB 32.6 D 11 25.2 D 8 WB 12.9 B 5 20.4 C 10 NB 526.2 F 219 277.6 F 127 SB 65.7 F 23 399.6 F 137 Intersection 191.1 F --167.8 F -- EB 22.1 C 6 25.0 C 6 WB 22.3 C 6 29.0 D 10 NB 66.2 F 37 23.7 C 8 SB 32.1 D 8 161.8 F 63 Intersection 37.9 E --55.8 F -- Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + RT slip, N/S LT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + N/S RT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative 661 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 934 310 675 199 1041 107 492 v/c Ratio 0.81 1.50 1.56 0.98 0.81 1.64 0.94 0.94 Control Delay 51.4 258.3 296.5 53.1 46.3 321.0 97.1 65.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.4 258.3 296.5 53.1 46.3 321.0 97.1 65.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 ~990 ~285 532 93 ~1160 47 365 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#55 m#1105 m#460 #779 #192 #1419 #138 #580 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 1296 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 132 622 199 689 247 636 114 526 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 1.50 1.56 0.98 0.81 1.64 0.94 0.94 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 662 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 98 706 154 285 513 108 183 588 370 98 404 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 98 706 154 285 513 108 183 588 370 98 404 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1709 1736 1723 1723 1709 1723 1641 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 107 767 167 310 558 117 199 639 402 107 439 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 3 2 8 0 Cap, veh/h 133 504 110 199 564 118 236 379 238 115 467 56 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.17 0.82 0.82 0.09 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1392 303 1667 1370 287 1641 989 622 1641 1436 173 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 107 0 934 310 0 675 199 0 1041 107 0 492 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 0 1695 1667 0 1657 1641 0 1611 1641 0 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 0.0 43.4 10.0 0.0 46.6 9.4 0.0 46.0 4.0 0.0 35.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 0.0 43.4 10.0 0.0 46.6 9.4 0.0 46.0 4.0 0.0 35.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 133 0 613 199 0 682 236 0 617 115 0 523 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 1.52 1.56 0.00 0.99 0.84 0.00 1.69 0.93 0.00 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 133 0 613 199 0 682 236 0 617 115 0 523 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.62 0.00 0.62 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.6 0.0 38.3 29.0 0.0 10.3 28.7 0.0 37.0 39.0 0.0 39.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 29.3 0.0 243.7 266.2 0.0 24.7 23.5 0.0 315.7 63.2 0.0 25.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.0 59.0 17.7 0.0 8.5 5.2 0.0 72.1 3.5 0.0 17.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.9 0.0 282.0 295.2 0.0 35.0 52.2 0.0 352.7 102.2 0.0 64.7 LnGrp LOS E A F F A D D A F F A E Approach Vol, veh/h 1041 985 1240 599 Approach Delay, s/veh 259.8 116.9 304.5 71.4 Approach LOS F F F E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 49.0 14.0 44.0 7.0 55.0 7.0 51.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 43.4 11.0 39.0 4.0 49.4 4.0 46.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.0 45.4 11.4 37.7 6.0 48.6 6.0 48.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 208.5 HCM 6th LOS F 663 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 847 399 818 207 796 171 720 v/c Ratio 0.97 1.31 1.56 1.04 1.31 1.40 1.47 1.35 Control Delay 89.9 173.0 298.1 65.1 203.5 222.6 280.2 204.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 89.9 173.0 298.1 65.1 203.5 222.6 280.2 204.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 ~822 ~400 ~666 ~156 ~815 ~132 ~732 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#80 m#990 m#532 m#906 #314 #1059 #269 #972 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 1296 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 117 648 255 789 158 568 116 532 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 1.31 1.56 1.04 1.31 1.40 1.47 1.35 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 664 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 611 168 367 602 151 190 442 291 157 558 104 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 611 168 367 602 151 190 442 291 157 558 104 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 113 664 183 399 654 164 207 480 316 171 607 113 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 116 500 138 254 623 156 157 328 216 116 442 82 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.23 0.92 0.92 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.03 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 1321 364 1667 1350 339 1667 985 648 1667 1435 267 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 113 0 847 399 0 818 207 0 796 171 0 720 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 0 1684 1667 0 1689 1667 0 1633 1667 0 1702 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 0.0 45.4 14.0 0.0 55.4 7.0 0.0 40.0 4.0 0.0 37.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 0.0 45.4 14.0 0.0 55.4 7.0 0.0 40.0 4.0 0.0 37.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.16 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 116 0 637 254 0 780 157 0 544 116 0 525 V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.00 1.33 1.57 0.00 1.05 1.32 0.00 1.46 1.48 0.00 1.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 116 0 637 254 0 780 157 0 544 116 0 525 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.53 0.00 0.53 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.7 0.0 37.3 30.5 0.0 4.6 33.7 0.0 40.0 41.3 0.0 41.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 76.5 0.0 158.7 265.6 0.0 37.5 180.1 0.0 217.9 256.4 0.0 179.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 0.0 46.1 22.1 0.0 9.9 11.0 0.0 48.9 9.9 0.0 41.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 113.2 0.0 196.0 296.1 0.0 42.1 213.8 0.0 257.9 297.6 0.0 220.7 LnGrp LOS F A F F A F F A F F A F Approach Vol, veh/h 960 1217 1003 891 Approach Delay, s/veh 186.3 125.4 248.8 235.5 Approach LOS F F F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 51.0 10.0 42.0 7.0 61.0 7.0 45.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 45.4 7.0 37.0 4.0 55.4 4.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.0 47.4 9.0 39.0 6.0 57.4 6.0 42.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 194.2 HCM 6th LOS F 665 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 934 310 675 199 1041 107 492 v/c Ratio 0.53 1.12 1.35 0.66 0.57 1.38 0.76 0.70 Control Delay 41.5 108.6 215.2 24.8 21.2 206.2 52.8 34.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.5 108.6 215.2 24.8 21.2 206.2 52.8 34.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 ~429 ~247 271 76 ~1060 38 301 Queue Length 95th (ft) m69 m#535 #458 138 119 #1319 #128 434 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 600 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 201 835 229 1024 347 756 140 699 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.53 1.12 1.35 0.66 0.57 1.38 0.76 0.70 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 666 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 98 706 154 285 513 108 183 588 370 98 404 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 98 706 154 285 513 108 183 588 370 98 404 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1709 1736 1723 1723 1709 1723 1641 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 107 767 167 310 558 117 199 639 402 107 439 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 3 2 8 0 Cap, veh/h 222 688 150 227 855 179 349 453 285 142 622 75 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 2715 591 1667 2673 559 1641 989 622 1641 1436 173 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 107 470 464 310 338 337 199 0 1041 107 0 492 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1663 1644 1667 1624 1608 1641 0 1611 1641 0 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 30.4 30.4 12.0 21.5 21.6 7.9 0.0 55.0 4.3 0.0 29.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 30.4 30.4 12.0 21.5 21.6 7.9 0.0 55.0 4.3 0.0 29.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 421 416 227 520 515 349 0 738 142 0 697 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 1.12 1.12 1.37 0.65 0.65 0.57 0.00 1.41 0.75 0.00 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 222 421 416 227 520 515 349 0 738 142 0 697 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.6 44.8 44.8 32.4 35.0 35.1 20.9 0.0 32.5 28.4 0.0 27.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 79.0 79.2 191.0 6.2 6.4 2.2 0.0 192.6 20.1 0.0 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 21.5 21.3 16.7 9.2 9.2 3.2 0.0 60.4 2.5 0.0 12.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.2 123.8 124.0 223.4 41.3 41.5 23.0 0.0 225.1 48.5 0.0 31.0 LnGrp LOS D F F F D D C A F D A C Approach Vol, veh/h 1041 985 1240 599 Approach Delay, s/veh 115.2 98.7 192.6 34.1 Approach LOS F F F C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 36.0 12.0 57.0 7.0 44.0 9.0 60.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 30.4 9.0 52.0 4.0 38.4 6.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.0 32.4 9.9 31.9 6.0 23.6 6.3 57.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 123.3 HCM 6th LOS F 667 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 847 399 818 207 796 171 720 v/c Ratio 0.57 1.05 1.34 0.74 0.97 1.11 1.20 1.09 Control Delay 37.1 83.0 203.7 29.3 84.7 99.6 162.2 97.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.1 83.0 203.7 29.3 84.7 99.6 162.2 97.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 ~328 ~335 303 111 ~690 ~110 ~625 Queue Length 95th (ft) m74 #484 #566 204 #268 #934 #256 #865 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 600 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 197 809 298 1102 213 718 143 660 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 1.05 1.34 0.74 0.97 1.11 1.20 1.09 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 668 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 611 168 367 602 151 190 442 291 157 558 104 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 611 168 367 602 151 190 442 291 157 558 104 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 113 664 183 399 654 164 207 480 316 171 607 113 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 223 631 174 296 887 222 213 419 276 143 550 102 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 2576 709 1667 2634 660 1667 985 648 1667 1435 267 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 113 428 419 399 413 405 207 0 796 171 0 720 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1622 1667 1663 1631 1667 0 1633 1667 0 1702 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.0 29.4 29.4 17.0 26.3 26.3 10.5 0.0 51.0 6.0 0.0 46.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.0 29.4 29.4 17.0 26.3 26.3 10.5 0.0 51.0 6.0 0.0 46.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.16 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 223 407 397 296 560 549 213 0 694 143 0 652 V/C Ratio(X) 0.51 1.05 1.05 1.35 0.74 0.74 0.97 0.00 1.15 1.19 0.00 1.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 223 407 397 296 560 549 213 0 694 143 0 652 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.5 45.3 45.3 35.3 35.1 35.1 35.1 0.0 34.5 31.5 0.0 37.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 58.9 59.8 177.2 8.4 8.6 53.7 0.0 82.3 136.3 0.0 67.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.6 18.6 18.2 21.3 11.7 11.6 6.5 0.0 35.8 8.0 0.0 31.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.4 104.2 105.1 212.4 43.5 43.8 88.8 0.0 116.8 167.8 0.0 104.1 LnGrp LOS D F F F D D F A F F A F Approach Vol, veh/h 960 1217 1003 891 Approach Delay, s/veh 96.5 99.0 111.0 116.3 Approach LOS F F F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 35.0 14.0 51.0 9.0 46.0 9.0 56.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 29.4 11.0 46.0 6.0 40.4 6.0 51.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.0 31.4 12.5 48.0 8.0 28.3 8.0 53.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 105.1 HCM 6th LOS F 669 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 934 310 675 199 639 402 107 439 53 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.93 1.04 0.54 0.73 0.99 0.49 0.88 0.80 0.07 Control Delay 19.8 45.2 102.9 15.4 38.4 71.9 16.2 81.5 49.2 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.8 45.2 102.9 15.4 38.4 71.9 16.2 81.5 49.2 0.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 306 ~150 159 95 488 156 48 310 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m48 m#376 #400 112 #169 #739 240 #141 #475 1 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 600 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 200 100 Base Capacity (vph) 303 1023 297 1260 274 643 828 122 546 709 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.91 1.04 0.54 0.73 0.99 0.49 0.88 0.80 0.07 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 670 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 98 706 154 285 513 108 183 588 370 98 404 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 98 706 154 285 513 108 183 588 370 98 404 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1709 1736 1723 1723 1709 1723 1641 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 107 767 167 310 558 117 199 639 402 107 439 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 3 2 8 0 Cap, veh/h 335 846 184 321 1056 221 268 646 748 120 547 581 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.40 0.40 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 2715 591 1667 2673 559 1641 1723 1448 1641 1641 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 107 470 464 310 338 337 199 639 402 107 439 53 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1663 1644 1667 1624 1608 1641 1723 1448 1641 1641 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 32.5 32.5 16.0 19.1 19.2 9.0 44.2 22.3 4.0 29.2 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 32.5 32.5 16.0 19.1 19.2 9.0 44.2 22.3 4.0 29.2 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 335 518 512 321 641 635 268 646 748 120 547 581 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.53 0.53 0.74 0.99 0.54 0.89 0.80 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 335 518 512 321 641 635 268 646 748 120 547 581 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.9 39.6 39.6 31.3 27.7 27.8 29.0 37.3 19.4 38.5 36.4 23.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 22.1 22.3 41.1 3.1 3.2 10.5 32.6 0.8 50.8 8.4 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 16.2 16.0 9.2 7.8 7.8 4.5 24.3 7.6 3.1 13.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.4 61.7 61.9 72.4 30.8 30.9 39.5 69.8 20.2 89.3 44.8 23.1 LnGrp LOS C E E E C C D E C F D C Approach Vol, veh/h 1041 985 1240 599 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.2 43.9 48.8 50.9 Approach LOS E D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 43.0 12.0 45.0 10.0 53.0 7.0 50.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 37.4 9.0 40.0 7.0 47.4 4.0 45.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.0 34.5 11.0 31.2 7.3 21.2 6.0 46.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 50.4 HCM 6th LOS D 671 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 847 399 818 207 480 316 171 607 113 v/c Ratio 0.43 1.01 0.95 0.61 1.31 0.82 0.35 0.79 1.04 0.16 Control Delay 25.9 72.3 69.7 20.3 202.5 50.0 11.0 50.8 87.9 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.9 72.3 69.7 20.3 202.5 50.0 11.0 50.8 87.9 8.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 ~328 216 137 ~156 340 92 82 ~508 16 Queue Length 95th (ft) m70 #484 #454 182 #314 #512 147 #172 #732 51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 600 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 200 100 Base Capacity (vph) 262 840 434 1344 158 583 916 216 583 689 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 1.01 0.92 0.61 1.31 0.82 0.34 0.79 1.04 0.16 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 672 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 611 168 367 602 151 190 442 291 157 558 104 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 611 168 367 602 151 190 442 291 157 558 104 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 113 664 183 399 654 164 207 480 316 171 607 113 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 305 651 179 422 1084 272 157 583 816 214 583 581 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.22 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 2576 709 1667 2634 660 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 113 428 419 399 413 405 207 480 316 171 607 113 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1622 1667 1663 1631 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.0 30.3 30.3 23.9 23.3 23.4 7.0 30.2 14.6 7.0 40.0 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.0 30.3 30.3 23.9 23.3 23.4 7.0 30.2 14.6 7.0 40.0 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 305 420 410 422 684 672 157 583 816 214 583 581 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 1.02 1.02 0.95 0.60 0.60 1.32 0.82 0.39 0.80 1.04 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 305 420 410 435 684 672 157 583 816 214 583 581 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 44.8 44.8 35.1 27.6 27.6 33.1 36.7 15.4 33.7 40.0 24.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 48.8 49.7 29.4 3.9 4.0 180.1 9.3 0.3 19.2 48.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 18.0 17.6 14.9 9.8 9.6 10.9 14.4 5.0 3.1 24.9 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.4 93.7 94.5 64.4 31.5 31.6 213.2 46.0 15.7 52.8 88.2 24.2 LnGrp LOS C F F E C C F D B D F C Approach Vol, veh/h 960 1217 1003 891 Approach Delay, s/veh 86.7 42.3 71.0 73.3 Approach LOS F D E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.1 35.9 10.0 45.0 10.0 55.0 10.0 45.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 29.4 7.0 40.0 7.0 49.4 7.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 25.9 32.3 9.0 42.0 8.0 25.4 9.0 32.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 2.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 66.6 HCM 6th LOS E 673 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy AM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 183 3.0 199 3.0 1.748 358.2 LOS F 185.7 4754.1 1.00 8.57 15.88 5.1 8 T1 588 3.0 639 3.0 1.748 358.2 LOS F 185.7 4754.1 1.00 8.57 15.88 5.1 18 R2 370 3.0 402 3.0 1.748 358.2 LOS F 185.7 4754.1 1.00 8.57 15.88 5.1 Approach 1141 3.0 1240 3.0 1.748 358.2 LOS F 185.7 4754.1 1.00 8.57 15.88 5.1 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 285 3.0 310 3.0 1.285 156.6 LOS F 90.5 2316.2 1.00 4.36 9.35 10.3 6 T1 513 3.0 558 3.0 1.285 156.6 LOS F 90.5 2316.2 1.00 4.36 9.35 10.2 16 R2 108 3.0 117 3.0 1.285 156.6 LOS F 90.5 2316.2 1.00 4.36 9.35 10.1 Approach 906 3.0 985 3.0 1.285 156.6 LOS F 90.5 2316.2 1.00 4.36 9.35 10.2 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 98 3.0 107 3.0 1.024 70.2 LOS F 25.8 660.3 1.00 2.74 4.77 14.6 4 T1 404 3.0 439 3.0 1.024 70.2 LOS F 25.8 660.3 1.00 2.74 4.77 14.4 14 R2 49 3.0 53 3.0 1.024 70.2 LOS F 25.8 660.3 1.00 2.74 4.77 14.2 Approach 551 3.0 599 3.0 1.024 70.2 LOS F 25.8 660.3 1.00 2.74 4.77 14.4 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 98 3.0 107 3.0 1.761 367.1 LOS F 156.2 3998.8 1.00 6.43 16.31 5.3 2 T1 706 3.0 767 3.0 1.761 367.1 LOS F 156.2 3998.8 1.00 6.43 16.31 5.3 12 R2 154 3.0 167 3.0 1.761 367.1 LOS F 156.2 3998.8 1.00 6.43 16.31 5.2 Approach 958 3.0 1041 3.0 1.761 367.1 LOS F 156.2 3998.8 1.00 6.43 16.31 5.3 All Vehicles 3556 3.0 3865 3.0 1.761 264.6 LOS F 185.7 4754.1 1.00 6.02 12.61 6.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:09:46 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 674 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy PM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 190 3.0 207 3.0 1.416 213.1 LOS F 111.0 2842.7 1.00 6.41 11.71 7.6 8 T1 442 3.0 480 3.0 1.416 213.1 LOS F 111.0 2842.7 1.00 6.41 11.71 7.6 18 R2 291 3.0 316 3.0 1.416 213.1 LOS F 111.0 2842.7 1.00 6.41 11.71 7.5 Approach 923 3.0 1003 3.0 1.416 213.1 LOS F 111.0 2842.7 1.00 6.41 11.71 7.5 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 367 3.0 399 3.0 1.635 307.3 LOS F 168.6 4317.0 1.00 6.33 14.43 6.1 6 T1 602 3.0 654 3.0 1.635 307.3 LOS F 168.6 4317.0 1.00 6.33 14.43 6.1 16 R2 151 3.0 164 3.0 1.635 307.3 LOS F 168.6 4317.0 1.00 6.33 14.43 6.1 Approach 1120 3.0 1217 3.0 1.635 307.3 LOS F 168.6 4317.0 1.00 6.33 14.43 6.1 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 157 3.0 171 3.0 1.540 270.6 LOS F 112.1 2869.0 1.00 6.86 13.67 6.4 4 T1 558 3.0 607 3.0 1.540 270.6 LOS F 112.1 2869.0 1.00 6.86 13.67 6.4 14 R2 104 3.0 113 3.0 1.540 270.6 LOS F 112.1 2869.0 1.00 6.86 13.67 6.3 Approach 819 3.0 890 3.0 1.540 270.6 LOS F 112.1 2869.0 1.00 6.86 13.67 6.4 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 104 3.0 113 3.0 1.561 278.8 LOS F 123.5 3161.4 1.00 5.67 13.97 6.6 2 T1 611 3.0 664 3.0 1.561 278.8 LOS F 123.5 3161.4 1.00 5.67 13.97 6.6 12 R2 168 3.0 183 3.0 1.561 278.8 LOS F 123.5 3161.4 1.00 5.67 13.97 6.6 Approach 883 3.0 960 3.0 1.561 278.8 LOS F 123.5 3161.4 1.00 5.67 13.97 6.6 All Vehicles 3745 3.0 4071 3.0 1.635 269.3 LOS F 168.6 4317.0 1.00 6.31 13.48 6.6 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:24:02 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 675 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy AM - dual E/W lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 183 3.0 199 3.0 2.119 526.2 LOS F 219.0 5606.0 1.00 10.23 22.20 3.7 8 T1 588 3.0 639 3.0 2.119 526.2 LOS F 219.0 5606.0 1.00 10.23 22.20 3.7 18 R2 370 3.0 402 3.0 2.119 526.2 LOS F 219.0 5606.0 1.00 10.23 22.20 3.7 Approach 1141 3.0 1240 3.0 2.119 526.2 LOS F 219.0 5606.0 1.00 10.23 22.20 3.7 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 285 3.0 310 3.0 0.582 13.3 LOS B 4.7 120.8 0.71 0.90 1.16 27.8 6 T1 513 3.0 558 3.0 0.582 12.7 LOS B 4.8 122.3 0.70 0.88 1.14 28.7 16 R2 108 3.0 117 3.0 0.582 12.5 LOS B 4.8 122.3 0.70 0.88 1.13 28.3 Approach 906 3.0 985 3.0 0.582 12.9 LOS B 4.8 122.3 0.70 0.89 1.14 28.4 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 98 3.0 107 3.0 1.009 65.7 LOS F 22.1 565.5 1.00 2.67 4.81 15.0 4 T1 404 3.0 439 3.0 1.009 65.7 LOS F 22.1 565.5 1.00 2.67 4.81 14.8 14 R2 49 3.0 53 3.0 1.009 65.7 LOS F 22.1 565.5 1.00 2.67 4.81 14.6 Approach 551 3.0 599 3.0 1.009 65.7 LOS F 22.1 565.5 1.00 2.67 4.81 14.9 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 98 3.0 107 3.0 0.837 34.1 LOS D 9.6 245.4 0.90 1.43 2.45 22.8 2 T1 706 3.0 767 3.0 0.837 32.7 LOS D 10.1 258.0 0.90 1.44 2.45 23.0 12 R2 154 3.0 167 3.0 0.837 31.4 LOS D 10.1 258.0 0.90 1.44 2.46 22.9 Approach 958 3.0 1041 3.0 0.837 32.6 LOS D 10.1 258.0 0.90 1.44 2.45 23.0 All Vehicles 3556 3.0 3865 3.0 2.119 191.1 LOS F 219.0 5606.0 0.90 4.31 8.82 8.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:15:22 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 676 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy PM - dual E/W lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 190 3.0 207 3.0 1.561 277.6 LOS F 126.6 3241.9 1.00 7.75 15.92 6.3 8 T1 442 3.0 480 3.0 1.561 277.6 LOS F 126.6 3241.9 1.00 7.75 15.92 6.2 18 R2 291 3.0 316 3.0 1.561 277.6 LOS F 126.6 3241.9 1.00 7.75 15.92 6.2 Approach 923 3.0 1003 3.0 1.561 277.6 LOS F 126.6 3241.9 1.00 7.75 15.92 6.2 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 367 3.0 399 3.0 0.752 21.1 LOS C 9.2 236.2 0.85 1.24 1.84 25.4 6 T1 602 3.0 654 3.0 0.752 20.1 LOS C 9.6 244.7 0.84 1.24 1.82 26.2 16 R2 151 3.0 164 3.0 0.752 19.7 LOS C 9.6 244.7 0.84 1.23 1.82 25.9 Approach 1120 3.0 1217 3.0 0.752 20.4 LOS C 9.6 244.7 0.85 1.24 1.83 25.9 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 157 3.0 171 3.0 1.826 399.6 LOS F 137.0 3507.2 1.00 8.20 18.55 4.7 4 T1 558 3.0 607 3.0 1.826 399.6 LOS F 137.0 3507.2 1.00 8.20 18.55 4.7 14 R2 104 3.0 113 3.0 1.826 399.6 LOS F 137.0 3507.2 1.00 8.20 18.55 4.7 Approach 819 3.0 890 3.0 1.826 399.6 LOS F 137.0 3507.2 1.00 8.20 18.55 4.7 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 104 3.0 113 3.0 0.760 26.4 LOS D 7.1 180.9 0.85 1.24 1.96 24.6 2 T1 611 3.0 664 3.0 0.760 25.3 LOS D 7.4 188.6 0.85 1.24 1.96 24.8 12 R2 168 3.0 183 3.0 0.760 24.2 LOS C 7.4 188.6 0.85 1.24 1.95 24.6 Approach 883 3.0 960 3.0 0.760 25.2 LOS D 7.4 188.6 0.85 1.24 1.96 24.8 All Vehicles 3745 3.0 4071 3.0 1.826 167.8 LOS F 137.0 3507.2 0.92 4.37 8.99 9.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:26:26 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 677 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy AM - 4 RT, N/S LT lanes (Site Folder: General)] Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.2.202 New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of Queue Mov ID Turn Mov Class Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Eff. Stop Rate Aver. No. of Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 All MCs 199 3.0 199 3.0 0.401 13.9 LOS B 1.7 42.7 0.72 0.81 0.93 20.6 8 T1 All MCs 639 3.0 639 3.0 1.155 111.9 LOS F 36.9 944.0 1.00 3.79 7.42 11.2 18 R2 All MCs 402 3.0 402 3.0 0.657 19.5 LOS C 4.3 109.9 0.80 1.04 1.40 20.3 Approach 1240 3.0 1240 3.0 1.155 66.2 LOS F 36.9 944.0 0.89 2.42 4.43 14.3 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 All MCs 310 3.0 310 3.0 0.734 25.4 LOS D 5.5 141.0 0.85 1.09 1.64 23.1 6 T1 All MCs 558 3.0 558 3.0 0.734 23.8 LOS C 5.7 144.7 0.85 1.08 1.63 24.5 16 R2 All MCs 117 3.0 117 3.0 0.179 7.5 LOS A 0.7 18.1 0.62 0.55 0.62 29.5 Approach 985 3.0 985 3.0 0.734 22.3 LOS C 5.7 144.7 0.82 1.02 1.51 24.5 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 All MCs 107 3.0 107 3.0 0.234 11.4 LOS B 0.8 19.9 0.70 0.70 0.70 21.1 4 T1 All MCs 439 3.0 439 3.0 0.861 40.2 LOS E 7.5 193.1 0.92 1.49 2.28 17.3 14 R2 All MCs 53 3.0 53 3.0 0.078 6.1 LOS A 0.3 6.5 0.55 0.50 0.55 23.1 Approach 599 3.0 599 3.0 0.861 32.1 LOS D 7.5 193.1 0.85 1.26 1.84 18.3 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 All MCs 107 3.0 107 3.0 0.737 25.5 LOS D 5.7 145.8 0.86 1.11 1.69 23.6 2 T1 All MCs 767 3.0 767 3.0 0.737 24.3 LOS C 5.9 149.8 0.85 1.10 1.69 24.4 12 R2 All MCs 167 3.0 167 3.0 0.281 9.8 LOS A 1.1 29.1 0.68 0.62 0.68 28.7 Approach 1041 3.0 1041 3.0 0.737 22.1 LOS C 5.9 149.8 0.83 1.03 1.52 24.9 All Vehicles 3865 3.0 3865 3.0 1.155 37.9 LOS E 36.9 944.0 0.85 1.51 2.50 19.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap. Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Saturday, February 11, 2023 6:50:57 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 678 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy PM - 4 RT, N/S LT lanes (Site Folder: General)] Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.2.202 New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of Queue Mov ID Turn Mov Class Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Eff. Stop Rate Aver. No. of Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 All MCs 207 3.0 207 3.0 0.403 13.6 LOS B 1.7 43.7 0.71 0.80 0.93 20.7 8 T1 All MCs 480 3.0 480 3.0 0.841 34.7 LOS D 7.9 201.4 0.91 1.45 2.17 18.1 18 R2 All MCs 316 3.0 316 3.0 0.498 13.5 LOS B 2.6 65.9 0.72 0.83 1.05 21.4 Approach 1003 3.0 1003 3.0 0.841 23.7 LOS C 7.9 201.4 0.81 1.12 1.56 19.6 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 All MCs 399 3.0 399 3.0 0.841 33.5 LOS D 9.0 230.1 0.93 1.32 2.21 21.3 6 T1 All MCs 654 3.0 654 3.0 0.841 31.6 LOS D 9.3 239.1 0.93 1.32 2.22 22.6 16 R2 All MCs 164 3.0 164 3.0 0.233 7.8 LOS A 1.0 24.8 0.62 0.53 0.62 29.4 Approach 1217 3.0 1217 3.0 0.841 29.0 LOS D 9.3 239.1 0.89 1.22 2.00 22.8 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 All MCs 171 3.0 171 3.0 0.456 19.6 LOS C 1.8 45.3 0.81 0.92 1.08 19.7 4 T1 All MCs 607 3.0 607 3.0 1.432 230.5 LOS F 62.6 1602.3 1.00 5.63 12.50 7.1 14 R2 All MCs 113 3.0 113 3.0 0.182 8.0 LOS A 0.6 15.7 0.61 0.58 0.61 22.6 Approach 890 3.0 890 3.0 1.432 161.8 LOS F 62.6 1602.3 0.91 4.09 8.80 9.0 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 All MCs 113 3.0 113 3.0 0.749 29.4 LOS D 5.2 133.2 0.86 1.14 1.72 22.6 2 T1 All MCs 664 3.0 664 3.0 0.749 28.0 LOS D 5.3 136.7 0.86 1.13 1.71 23.5 12 R2 All MCs 183 3.0 183 3.0 0.332 11.4 LOS B 1.4 36.6 0.71 0.71 0.81 28.1 Approach 960 3.0 960 3.0 0.749 25.0 LOS C 5.3 136.7 0.83 1.05 1.54 24.1 All Vehicles 4071 3.0 4071 3.0 1.432 55.8 LOS F 62.6 1602.3 0.86 1.78 3.27 16.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap. Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Saturday, February 11, 2023 6:56:19 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 679 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 0.3 A 2 1.0 A 15 WB 2.3 A 34 4.8 A 38 NB 25.3 C 1 34.3 C 2 SB 31.4 C 2 45.2 D 6 Intersection 2.9 A --8.3 A -- EB 4.0 A 3 6.5 A 5 WB 8.1 A 6 11.3 B 6 NB 25.8 C 1 21.8 C 1 SB 24.2 C 2 26.0 C 4 Intersection 6.9 A --11.0 B -- EB 36.9 E 56 26.0 D 23 WB 45.8 E 56 21.0 C 20 NB 10.2 B 1 11.5 B 1 SB 11.1 B 1 21.0 C 4 Intersection 39.3 E --23.1 C -- EB 7.8 A 4 7.3 A 3 WB 8.7 A 3 7.1 A 3 NB 7.9 A 1 8.8 A 1 SB 8.6 A 1 14.3 B 3 Intersection 8.2 A --8.1 A -- South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative 680 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 998 26 1011 13 31 90 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.74 0.09 0.76 0.07 0.23 0.35 Control Delay 11.6 3.5 3.4 19.8 20.2 27.4 10.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.6 3.5 3.4 19.8 20.2 27.4 10.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 40 3 717 3 10 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m8 m32 m5 m829 16 31 33 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1296 1326 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 283 1356 293 1337 494 349 509 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.74 0.09 0.76 0.03 0.09 0.18 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 681 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 209 892 26 24 863 67 1 7 4 21 7 83 Future Volume (veh/h) 209 892 26 24 863 67 1 7 4 21 7 83 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1736 1695 1750 1723 1723 1750 1750 1750 1518 1559 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 227 970 28 26 938 73 1 8 4 23 8 90 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 17 14 0 Cap, veh/h 556 1293 37 561 1215 95 69 94 44 179 44 129 Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 566 1679 48 573 1578 123 56 1084 507 861 502 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 227 0 998 26 0 1011 13 0 0 31 0 90 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 566 0 1728 573 0 1701 1646 0 0 1362 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.07 0.08 0.31 0.74 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 556 0 1330 561 0 1309 207 0 0 223 0 129 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.00 0.75 0.05 0.00 0.77 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 556 0 1330 561 0 1309 555 0 0 507 0 445 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.33 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.51 0.00 0.51 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 25.5 0.0 26.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 2.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 6.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 2.3 25.3 0.0 0.0 25.8 0.0 33.3 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A C Approach Vol, veh/h 1225 1037 13 121 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.3 2.3 25.3 31.4 Approach LOS A A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 50.8 9.2 50.8 9.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.0 4.6 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.4 18.0 33.4 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 5.5 2.0 2.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 13.3 0.3 10.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 2.9 HCM 6th LOS A 682 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 104 1047 7 994 54 42 242 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.90 0.06 0.86 0.12 0.11 0.47 Control Delay 19.2 18.8 6.8 29.9 15.1 35.2 16.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.2 18.8 6.8 29.9 15.1 35.2 16.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 489 2 781 8 25 48 Queue Length 95th (ft) m29 m354 m3 942 41 55 127 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1296 1326 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 153 1171 119 1168 436 368 513 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.89 0.06 0.85 0.12 0.11 0.47 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 683 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 959 5 6 892 22 6 6 37 32 6 223 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 959 5 6 892 22 6 6 37 32 6 223 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 104 1042 5 7 970 24 7 7 40 35 7 242 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 446 1166 6 427 1139 28 64 70 285 364 68 383 Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 576 1740 8 547 1700 42 117 270 1104 1196 262 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 104 0 1047 7 0 994 54 0 0 42 0 242 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 576 0 1748 547 0 1742 1490 0 0 1457 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 17.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 0.13 0.74 0.83 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 446 0 1171 427 0 1167 419 0 0 431 0 383 V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.00 0.89 0.02 0.00 0.85 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 446 0 1171 427 0 1167 419 0 0 431 0 383 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.58 0.00 0.58 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.2 0.0 0.0 33.8 0.0 39.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 7.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 7.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 34.3 0.0 0.0 34.3 0.0 47.1 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A D Approach Vol, veh/h 1151 1001 54 284 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.0 4.8 34.3 45.2 Approach LOS A A C D Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 85.0 35.0 85.0 35.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.0 4.6 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 80.4 31.0 80.4 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 19.4 2.0 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 14.8 0.8 11.1 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.3 HCM 6th LOS A 684 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 998 26 1011 13 31 90 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.35 0.08 0.46 0.08 0.19 0.26 Control Delay 6.7 1.3 5.2 7.5 21.9 27.2 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.7 1.3 5.2 7.5 21.9 27.2 6.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 0 1 26 3 10 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m37 m31 m10 357 17 33 28 Internal Link Dist (ft) 616 385 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 485 2936 352 2269 170 162 343 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.34 0.07 0.45 0.08 0.19 0.26 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 685 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 209 892 26 24 863 67 1 7 4 21 7 83 Future Volume (veh/h) 209 892 26 24 863 67 1 7 4 21 7 83 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1736 1695 1750 1723 1723 1750 1750 1750 1518 1559 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 227 970 28 26 938 73 1 8 4 23 8 90 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 17 14 0 Cap, veh/h 507 2440 70 472 1888 147 69 84 40 171 40 237 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.75 0.75 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 3274 95 573 3077 239 61 1078 506 848 517 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 227 489 509 26 499 512 13 0 0 31 0 90 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1650 1719 573 1637 1680 1645 0 0 1365 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 6.4 6.4 1.1 10.2 10.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 6.4 6.4 1.1 10.2 10.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.14 0.08 0.31 0.74 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 507 1229 1281 472 1004 1031 193 0 0 211 0 237 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 510 1229 1281 472 1004 1031 202 0 0 218 0 244 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.6 2.8 2.8 4.7 6.4 6.4 25.7 0.0 0.0 26.0 0.0 22.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.0 0.9 0.2 1.8 1.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.3 1.3 0.1 3.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.2 3.7 3.7 4.9 8.2 8.2 25.8 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 23.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A C Approach Vol, veh/h 1225 1037 13 121 Approach Delay, s/veh 4.0 8.1 25.8 24.3 Approach LOS A A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 50.3 9.7 7.9 42.4 9.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.6 5.0 3.0 5.6 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 44.4 5.0 5.0 36.4 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 5.3 4.6 12.2 2.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.9 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.9 HCM 6th LOS A 686 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 104 1047 7 994 54 42 242 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.39 0.02 0.49 0.25 0.27 0.56 Control Delay 2.0 2.4 5.0 8.3 14.0 27.3 15.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.0 2.4 5.0 8.3 14.0 27.3 15.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 118 1 244 5 14 41 Queue Length 95th (ft) m8 m54 m2 320 30 38 92 Internal Link Dist (ft) 616 385 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 463 2684 292 2030 281 211 436 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.39 0.02 0.49 0.19 0.20 0.56 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 687 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 959 5 6 892 22 6 6 37 32 6 223 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 959 5 6 892 22 6 6 37 32 6 223 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 104 1042 5 7 970 24 7 7 40 35 7 242 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 434 2228 11 396 1784 44 80 53 186 306 51 349 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.66 0.66 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 3393 16 547 3316 82 75 316 1118 1174 305 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 104 511 536 7 486 508 54 0 0 42 0 242 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1747 547 1663 1735 1509 0 0 1479 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 9.1 9.1 0.4 11.5 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 9.1 9.1 2.4 11.5 11.5 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 8.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.05 0.13 0.74 0.83 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 434 1092 1147 396 895 934 319 0 0 356 0 349 V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.47 0.47 0.02 0.54 0.54 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 459 1092 1147 396 895 934 319 0 0 356 0 349 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.0 5.1 5.1 7.5 9.0 9.0 21.6 0.0 0.0 21.4 0.0 21.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.4 1.4 0.1 2.4 2.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 5.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 2.5 2.6 0.0 3.9 4.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.3 6.5 6.5 7.5 11.4 11.3 21.8 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 26.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A B B C A A C A C Approach Vol, veh/h 1151 1001 54 284 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.5 11.3 21.8 26.0 Approach LOS A B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 45.0 15.0 7.1 37.9 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.6 5.0 3.0 5.6 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.4 10.0 5.0 31.4 10.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.1 10.9 3.4 13.5 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.9 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.0 HCM 6th LOS B 688 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy AM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.035 10.2 LOS B 0.1 3.0 0.73 0.73 0.73 23.6 8 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.035 10.2 LOS B 0.1 3.0 0.73 0.73 0.73 23.1 18 R2 4 3.0 4 3.0 0.035 10.2 LOS B 0.1 3.0 0.73 0.73 0.73 22.6 Approach 12 3.0 13 3.0 0.035 10.2 LOS B 0.1 3.0 0.73 0.73 0.73 23.0 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 24 3.0 26 3.0 0.992 45.8 LOS E 55.3 1415.3 1.00 2.06 3.25 20.5 6 T1 863 3.0 938 3.0 0.992 45.8 LOS E 55.3 1415.3 1.00 2.06 3.25 20.4 16 R2 67 3.0 73 3.0 0.992 45.8 LOS E 55.3 1415.3 1.00 2.06 3.25 20.0 Approach 954 3.0 1037 3.0 0.992 45.8 LOS E 55.3 1415.3 1.00 2.06 3.25 20.3 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 21 3.0 23 3.0 0.248 11.1 LOS B 0.9 24.3 0.70 0.70 0.70 23.1 4 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.248 11.1 LOS B 0.9 24.3 0.70 0.70 0.70 22.7 14 R2 83 3.0 90 3.0 0.248 11.1 LOS B 0.9 24.3 0.70 0.70 0.70 22.2 Approach 111 3.0 121 3.0 0.248 11.1 LOS B 0.9 24.3 0.70 0.70 0.70 22.4 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 209 3.0 227 3.0 0.970 36.9 LOS E 55.3 1414.6 1.00 0.64 1.22 22.1 2 T1 892 3.0 970 3.0 0.970 36.9 LOS E 55.3 1414.6 1.00 0.64 1.22 22.0 12 R2 26 3.0 28 3.0 0.970 36.9 LOS E 55.3 1414.6 1.00 0.64 1.22 21.5 Approach 1127 3.0 1225 3.0 0.970 36.9 LOS E 55.3 1414.6 1.00 0.64 1.22 22.0 All Vehicles 2204 3.0 2396 3.0 0.992 39.3 LOS E 55.3 1415.3 0.98 1.26 2.07 21.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:44:02 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 689 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy PM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.138 11.5 LOS B 0.5 12.3 0.74 0.74 0.74 23.1 8 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.138 11.5 LOS B 0.5 12.3 0.74 0.74 0.74 22.7 18 R2 37 3.0 40 3.0 0.138 11.5 LOS B 0.5 12.3 0.74 0.74 0.74 22.1 Approach 49 3.0 53 3.0 0.138 11.5 LOS B 0.5 12.3 0.74 0.74 0.74 22.3 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.844 21.0 LOS C 20.0 511.0 0.89 0.70 1.09 26.4 6 T1 892 3.0 970 3.0 0.844 21.0 LOS C 20.0 511.0 0.89 0.70 1.09 26.2 16 R2 22 3.0 24 3.0 0.844 21.0 LOS C 20.0 511.0 0.89 0.70 1.09 25.6 Approach 920 3.0 1000 3.0 0.844 21.0 LOS C 20.0 511.0 0.89 0.70 1.09 26.2 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 32 3.0 35 3.0 0.594 21.0 LOS C 3.6 92.6 0.81 1.07 1.42 21.0 4 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.594 21.0 LOS C 3.6 92.6 0.81 1.07 1.42 20.6 14 R2 223 3.0 242 3.0 0.594 21.0 LOS C 3.6 92.6 0.81 1.07 1.42 20.2 Approach 261 3.0 284 3.0 0.594 21.0 LOS C 3.6 92.6 0.81 1.07 1.42 20.3 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 96 3.0 104 3.0 0.904 26.0 LOS D 22.2 567.3 0.88 0.39 0.88 24.8 2 T1 959 3.0 1042 3.0 0.904 26.0 LOS D 22.2 567.3 0.88 0.39 0.88 24.7 12 R2 5 3.0 5 3.0 0.904 26.0 LOS D 22.2 567.3 0.88 0.39 0.88 24.1 Approach 1060 3.0 1152 3.0 0.904 26.0 LOS D 22.2 567.3 0.88 0.39 0.88 24.7 All Vehicles 2290 3.0 2489 3.0 0.904 23.1 LOS C 22.2 567.3 0.87 0.60 1.02 24.6 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:47:05 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 690 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy AM - dual E/W lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.028 7.9 LOS A 0.1 2.2 0.66 0.65 0.66 24.1 8 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.028 7.9 LOS A 0.1 2.2 0.66 0.65 0.66 23.7 18 R2 4 3.0 4 3.0 0.028 7.9 LOS A 0.1 2.2 0.66 0.65 0.66 23.1 Approach 12 3.0 13 3.0 0.028 7.9 LOS A 0.1 2.2 0.66 0.65 0.66 23.5 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 24 3.0 26 3.0 0.478 8.9 LOS A 2.7 68.3 0.51 0.40 0.51 30.6 6 T1 863 3.0 938 3.0 0.478 8.7 LOS A 2.7 68.3 0.50 0.39 0.50 30.5 16 R2 67 3.0 73 3.0 0.478 8.5 LOS A 2.6 67.4 0.49 0.37 0.49 29.7 Approach 954 3.0 1037 3.0 0.478 8.7 LOS A 2.7 68.3 0.50 0.38 0.50 30.4 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 21 3.0 23 3.0 0.204 8.6 LOS A 0.7 18.2 0.63 0.63 0.63 23.7 4 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.204 8.6 LOS A 0.7 18.2 0.63 0.63 0.63 23.2 14 R2 83 3.0 90 3.0 0.204 8.6 LOS A 0.7 18.2 0.63 0.63 0.63 22.7 Approach 111 3.0 121 3.0 0.204 8.6 LOS A 0.7 18.2 0.63 0.63 0.63 22.9 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 209 3.0 227 3.0 0.480 7.9 LOS A 3.1 78.6 0.26 0.12 0.26 30.2 2 T1 892 3.0 970 3.0 0.480 7.8 LOS A 3.1 78.6 0.25 0.11 0.25 30.6 12 R2 26 3.0 28 3.0 0.480 7.6 LOS A 3.0 76.7 0.24 0.11 0.24 30.1 Approach 1127 3.0 1225 3.0 0.480 7.8 LOS A 3.1 78.6 0.25 0.11 0.25 30.5 All Vehicles 2204 3.0 2396 3.0 0.480 8.2 LOS A 3.1 78.6 0.38 0.26 0.38 29.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:51:16 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 691 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy PM - dual E/W lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.109 8.8 LOS A 0.4 9.0 0.67 0.67 0.67 23.8 8 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.109 8.8 LOS A 0.4 9.0 0.67 0.67 0.67 23.3 18 R2 37 3.0 40 3.0 0.109 8.8 LOS A 0.4 9.0 0.67 0.67 0.67 22.7 Approach 49 3.0 53 3.0 0.109 8.8 LOS A 0.4 9.0 0.67 0.67 0.67 22.9 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.414 7.3 LOS A 2.3 58.8 0.34 0.20 0.34 31.3 6 T1 892 3.0 970 3.0 0.414 7.1 LOS A 2.3 58.8 0.33 0.19 0.33 31.2 16 R2 22 3.0 24 3.0 0.414 7.0 LOS A 2.2 57.5 0.33 0.19 0.33 30.4 Approach 920 3.0 1000 3.0 0.414 7.1 LOS A 2.3 58.8 0.33 0.19 0.33 31.2 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 32 3.0 35 3.0 0.486 14.3 LOS B 2.5 63.6 0.73 0.90 1.13 22.4 4 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.486 14.3 LOS B 2.5 63.6 0.73 0.90 1.13 22.0 14 R2 223 3.0 242 3.0 0.486 14.3 LOS B 2.5 63.6 0.73 0.90 1.13 21.5 Approach 261 3.0 284 3.0 0.486 14.3 LOS B 2.5 63.6 0.73 0.90 1.13 21.6 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 96 3.0 104 3.0 0.447 7.4 LOS A 2.7 70.1 0.22 0.09 0.22 30.9 2 T1 959 3.0 1042 3.0 0.447 7.3 LOS A 2.7 70.1 0.22 0.09 0.22 31.0 12 R2 5 3.0 5 3.0 0.447 7.1 LOS A 2.7 68.4 0.21 0.09 0.21 30.3 Approach 1060 3.0 1152 3.0 0.447 7.3 LOS A 2.7 70.1 0.22 0.09 0.22 31.0 All Vehicles 2290 3.0 2489 3.0 0.486 8.1 LOS A 2.7 70.1 0.33 0.24 0.38 29.4 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:53:13 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 692 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 87.1 F 34 84.1 F 31 WB 134.4 F 32 172.2 F 30 NB 99.8 F 32 41.7 D 18 SB 75.5 E 17 96.2 F 26 Intersection 103.9 F --103.5 F -- EB 58.1 E 16 48.8 D 15 WB 61.7 E 24 48.9 D 24 NB 55.2 E 29 35.5 D 18 SB 47.1 D 14 76.3 E 25 Intersection 56.8 E --50.6 D -- EB 49.5 D 12 61.4 E 17 WB 73.0 E 34 62.6 E 30 NB 99.4 F 32 39.4 D 18 SB 65.7 E 17 56.5 E 23 Intersection 74.8 E --55.9 E -- EB 244.8 F 104 339.9 F 141 WB 162.6 F 119 170.4 F 113 NB 523.5 F 215 185.9 F 81 SB 37.7 E 12 87.0 F 40 Intersection 263.0 F --199.9 F -- EB 27.1 D 8 39.8 E 12 WB 36.3 E 16 30.7 D 13 NB 100.9 F 60 32.9 D 12 SB 92.3 F 35 167.3 F 72 Intersection 62.4 F --63.5 F -- EB 33.0 D 9 73.3 F 22 WB 54.9 F 23 29.7 D 12 NB 56.1 F 30 19.7 C 6 SB 27.0 D 7 56.4 F 24 Intersection 45.7 E --44.9 E -- South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + SB/NB RT lanes South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + SB/NB RT, LT lanes Intersection Approach Design Year (2045) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + SB RT, 2 WB LT lanes South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane 693 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 668 65 479 711 223 115 596 547 155 371 216 v/c Ratio 1.06 1.13 0.09 1.43 0.96 0.31 0.50 1.24 0.70 1.07 0.78 0.41 Control Delay 93.9 101.9 4.0 240.9 57.7 8.3 33.9 162.1 25.2 125.4 52.9 11.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.9 101.9 4.0 240.9 57.7 8.3 33.9 162.1 25.2 125.4 52.9 11.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~123 ~595 0 ~455 523 30 58 ~573 271 ~89 266 27 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#259 #829 m8 #666 #780 84 102 #795 411 #219 #407 94 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1326 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 150 Base Capacity (vph) 213 592 719 334 743 714 229 481 778 145 476 531 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.06 1.13 0.09 1.43 0.96 0.31 0.50 1.24 0.70 1.07 0.78 0.41 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 694 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 208 615 60 441 654 205 106 548 503 143 341 199 Future Volume (veh/h) 208 615 60 441 654 205 106 548 503 143 341 199 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1736 1750 1723 1723 1709 1709 1750 1736 1723 1736 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 226 668 65 479 711 0 115 596 547 155 371 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 1 0 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 1 0 Cap, veh/h 209 593 581 333 747 220 481 650 142 477 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.68 0.68 0.17 0.43 0.00 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.28 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1736 1483 1641 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 226 668 65 479 711 0 115 596 547 155 371 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1736 1483 1641 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.0 41.0 1.7 20.0 47.8 0.0 6.0 33.0 33.0 6.0 23.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 41.0 1.7 20.0 47.8 0.0 6.0 33.0 33.0 6.0 23.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 209 593 581 333 747 220 481 650 142 477 V/C Ratio(X) 1.08 1.13 0.11 1.44 0.95 0.52 1.24 0.84 1.09 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 209 593 581 333 747 220 481 650 142 477 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.60 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.8 19.0 10.9 37.9 32.8 0.0 32.5 43.5 29.8 39.2 40.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 71.7 69.9 0.2 212.8 23.2 0.0 2.3 124.1 9.7 102.1 7.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.7 19.6 0.6 25.0 23.9 0.0 2.6 30.9 15.6 5.6 11.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 103.5 88.9 11.2 250.8 56.0 0.0 34.8 167.6 39.5 141.3 48.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F F B F E C F D F D Approach Vol, veh/h 959 1190 1258 526 Approach Delay, s/veh 87.1 134.4 99.8 75.5 Approach LOS F F F E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 48.0 9.0 40.0 12.0 59.0 9.0 40.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 41.0 6.0 33.0 9.0 52.0 6.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.0 43.0 8.0 25.6 11.0 49.8 8.0 35.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 103.9 HCM 6th LOS F Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 695 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 285 691 113 521 629 137 100 383 375 162 496 250 v/c Ratio 0.96 1.10 0.15 1.60 0.86 0.20 0.69 0.83 0.49 0.75 1.06 0.50 Control Delay 47.6 88.5 7.9 310.5 45.6 7.4 51.5 57.9 17.4 51.6 102.4 19.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.6 88.5 7.9 310.5 45.6 7.4 51.5 57.9 17.4 51.6 102.4 19.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 99 ~624 22 ~529 437 15 51 280 138 86 ~423 65 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#169 m#757 m28 #747 #653 54 #105 #438 223 #170 #635 148 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1326 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 150 Base Capacity (vph) 297 627 742 326 729 681 145 462 770 216 466 502 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.96 1.10 0.15 1.60 0.86 0.20 0.69 0.83 0.49 0.75 1.06 0.50 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 696 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Three-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 262 636 104 479 579 126 92 352 345 149 456 230 Future Volume (veh/h) 262 636 104 479 579 126 92 352 345 149 456 230 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1723 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 285 691 113 521 629 0 100 383 375 162 496 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 299 627 606 324 729 142 463 630 186 467 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.42 0.00 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.27 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 285 691 113 521 629 0 100 383 375 162 496 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 43.0 7.6 19.0 39.3 0.0 5.3 24.9 23.4 6.0 32.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 43.0 7.6 19.0 39.3 0.0 5.3 24.9 23.4 6.0 32.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 299 627 606 324 729 142 463 630 186 467 V/C Ratio(X) 0.95 1.10 0.19 1.61 0.86 0.70 0.83 0.59 0.87 1.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 299 627 606 324 729 142 463 630 186 467 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.31 0.31 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.8 52.9 32.0 38.4 31.9 0.0 34.1 41.4 26.6 41.1 44.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.7 54.0 0.2 287.8 12.8 0.0 14.6 11.8 1.5 33.4 59.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.1 29.6 3.0 31.0 18.6 0.0 2.7 12.2 8.5 3.9 21.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.5 106.9 32.2 326.2 44.7 0.0 48.7 53.2 28.1 74.4 103.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F C F D D D C E F Approach Vol, veh/h 1089 1150 858 658 Approach Delay, s/veh 84.1 172.2 41.7 96.2 Approach LOS F F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 50.0 9.0 39.0 15.0 57.0 9.0 39.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 43.0 6.0 32.0 12.0 50.0 6.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.0 45.0 7.3 34.0 14.0 41.3 8.0 26.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 103.5 HCM 6th LOS F Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 697 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 668 65 479 711 223 115 596 547 155 371 216 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.94 0.12 1.11 0.64 0.30 0.37 1.05 0.59 0.89 0.63 0.36 Control Delay 30.0 61.4 3.7 108.9 36.3 9.1 23.9 91.1 15.7 69.9 38.7 13.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.0 61.4 3.7 108.9 36.3 9.1 23.9 91.1 15.7 69.9 38.7 13.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 225 0 ~370 242 39 52 ~502 215 71 239 45 Queue Length 95th (ft) 133 #376 12 #582 310 92 90 #725 323 #198 348 109 Internal Link Dist (ft) 861 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 325 713 545 432 1116 747 315 568 921 174 592 595 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.94 0.12 1.11 0.64 0.30 0.37 1.05 0.59 0.89 0.63 0.36 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 698 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 208 615 60 441 654 205 106 548 503 143 341 199 Future Volume (veh/h) 208 615 60 441 654 205 106 548 503 143 341 199 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1736 1750 1723 1723 1709 1709 1750 1736 1723 1736 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 226 668 65 479 711 0 115 596 547 155 371 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 1 0 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 1 0 Cap, veh/h 341 715 395 443 1118 305 569 809 169 593 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.34 0.00 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.34 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 3299 1483 1641 3273 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 226 668 65 479 711 0 115 596 547 155 371 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1650 1483 1641 1637 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 23.9 4.0 27.0 21.9 0.0 5.7 39.0 32.0 7.5 21.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 23.9 4.0 27.0 21.9 0.0 5.7 39.0 32.0 7.5 21.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 341 715 395 443 1118 305 569 809 169 593 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.93 0.16 1.08 0.64 0.38 1.05 0.68 0.92 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 341 715 395 443 1118 305 569 809 169 593 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.4 46.2 33.7 33.4 33.2 0.0 27.0 40.5 19.3 30.5 33.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 21.0 0.9 66.5 2.8 0.0 0.8 50.9 2.2 45.4 2.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.6 11.7 1.6 18.6 9.0 0.0 2.3 24.7 11.2 5.1 9.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.1 67.2 34.6 99.9 36.0 0.0 27.8 91.4 21.6 75.9 35.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D E C F D C F C E D Approach Vol, veh/h 959 1190 1258 526 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.1 61.7 55.2 47.1 Approach LOS E E E D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 33.0 9.0 48.0 15.0 48.0 11.0 46.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 26.0 6.0 41.0 12.0 41.0 8.0 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 29.0 25.9 7.7 23.5 14.0 23.9 9.5 41.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 56.8 HCM 6th LOS E Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 699 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 285 691 113 521 629 137 100 383 375 162 496 250 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.91 0.20 1.02 0.53 0.18 0.65 0.80 0.41 0.65 0.99 0.49 Control Delay 25.3 53.6 7.5 76.6 33.3 3.8 45.7 54.0 11.8 39.9 80.6 22.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.3 53.6 7.5 76.6 33.3 3.8 45.7 54.0 11.8 39.9 80.6 22.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 254 20 ~355 199 0 50 277 118 84 ~385 82 Queue Length 95th (ft) 158 #366 19 #585 278 37 #97 #427 184 #143 #611 165 Internal Link Dist (ft) 861 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 493 775 577 512 1182 779 154 481 922 248 502 511 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.89 0.20 1.02 0.53 0.18 0.65 0.80 0.41 0.65 0.99 0.49 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 700 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/26/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Five-Lane Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 262 636 104 479 579 126 92 352 345 149 456 230 Future Volume (veh/h) 262 636 104 479 579 126 92 352 345 149 456 230 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1723 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 285 691 113 521 629 0 100 383 375 162 496 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 469 776 420 527 1172 142 477 803 207 496 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.27 0.35 0.00 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 3325 1483 1667 3325 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 285 691 113 521 629 0 100 383 375 162 496 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1483 1667 1663 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.3 24.1 7.1 31.4 18.1 0.0 5.3 24.6 18.6 7.0 34.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.3 24.1 7.1 31.4 18.1 0.0 5.3 24.6 18.6 7.0 34.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 469 776 420 527 1172 142 477 803 207 496 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.89 0.27 0.99 0.54 0.70 0.80 0.47 0.78 1.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 529 776 420 527 1172 142 477 803 207 496 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.8 44.5 33.4 32.1 31.0 0.0 33.6 40.5 16.9 36.8 43.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 14.6 1.6 36.4 1.8 0.0 14.6 9.5 0.4 17.3 40.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 11.4 2.8 20.2 7.5 0.0 2.7 11.8 6.4 2.7 20.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.5 59.1 34.9 68.4 32.8 0.0 48.2 50.0 17.3 54.1 83.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C E C E C D D B D F Approach Vol, veh/h 1089 1150 858 658 Approach Delay, s/veh 48.8 48.9 35.5 76.3 Approach LOS D D D E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.0 35.0 9.0 41.0 20.7 49.3 10.0 40.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.0 28.0 6.0 34.0 22.0 38.0 7.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 33.4 26.1 7.3 36.0 17.3 20.1 9.0 26.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.9 0.0 2.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 50.6 HCM 6th LOS D Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 701 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/23/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 668 65 479 711 223 115 596 547 155 371 216 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.63 0.09 0.86 1.04 0.28 0.47 1.24 0.69 0.97 0.78 0.30 Control Delay 91.9 29.2 4.2 63.8 80.1 11.5 31.4 162.1 24.3 95.7 52.9 8.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 91.9 29.2 4.2 63.8 80.1 11.5 31.4 162.1 24.3 95.7 52.9 8.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~133 171 0 185 ~593 59 58 ~573 266 80 266 33 Queue Length 95th (ft) #300 272 m12 #264 #827 110 101 #795 402 #207 #407 84 Internal Link Dist (ft) 861 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 225 1064 705 579 686 783 243 481 797 159 476 726 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.63 0.09 0.83 1.04 0.28 0.47 1.24 0.69 0.97 0.78 0.30 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 702 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/23/2023 AM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 208 615 60 441 654 205 106 548 503 143 341 199 Future Volume (veh/h) 208 615 60 441 654 205 106 548 503 143 341 199 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1736 1750 1723 1723 1709 1709 1750 1736 1723 1736 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 226 668 65 479 711 0 115 596 547 155 371 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 1 0 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 1 0 Cap, veh/h 224 1096 579 534 689 233 481 652 156 477 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.40 0.00 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 3299 1483 3183 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 226 668 65 479 711 0 115 596 547 155 371 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1650 1483 1591 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 20.3 3.4 17.7 48.0 0.0 6.1 33.0 33.0 7.0 23.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 20.3 3.4 17.7 48.0 0.0 6.1 33.0 33.0 7.0 23.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 224 1096 579 534 689 233 481 652 156 477 V/C Ratio(X) 1.01 0.61 0.11 0.90 1.03 0.49 1.24 0.84 1.00 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 224 1096 579 584 689 233 481 652 156 477 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.1 33.6 23.3 48.9 36.0 0.0 31.3 43.5 29.6 37.5 40.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 62.4 2.5 0.4 15.7 42.7 0.0 1.6 124.1 9.5 70.7 7.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.5 8.4 1.3 8.1 27.6 0.0 2.5 30.9 15.6 4.6 11.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 96.5 36.1 23.7 64.6 78.7 0.0 32.9 167.6 39.2 108.2 48.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D C E F C F D F D Approach Vol, veh/h 959 1190 1258 526 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.5 73.0 99.4 65.7 Approach LOS D E F E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.1 46.9 10.0 40.0 15.0 55.0 10.0 40.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 38.0 7.0 33.0 12.0 48.0 7.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.7 22.3 8.1 25.6 14.0 50.0 9.0 35.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 4.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 74.8 HCM 6th LOS E Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 703 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/23/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 285 691 113 521 629 137 100 383 375 162 496 250 v/c Ratio 1.09 0.71 0.17 0.89 1.00 0.17 0.57 0.84 0.47 0.57 0.93 0.32 Control Delay 111.9 38.9 8.2 65.8 75.7 3.6 36.1 59.2 15.5 30.6 64.7 9.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 111.9 38.9 8.2 65.8 75.7 3.6 36.1 59.2 15.5 30.6 64.7 9.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~233 244 14 204 ~487 4 46 277 127 77 361 48 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#411 338 m25 #297 #736 35 82 #427 206 126 #552 103 Internal Link Dist (ft) 861 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 261 978 669 601 627 830 175 476 804 291 568 789 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.09 0.71 0.17 0.87 1.00 0.17 0.57 0.80 0.47 0.56 0.87 0.32 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 704 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/23/2023 PM Peak 2045 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2045) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 262 636 104 479 579 126 92 352 345 149 456 230 Future Volume (veh/h) 262 636 104 479 579 126 92 352 345 149 456 230 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1723 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 285 691 113 521 629 0 100 383 375 162 496 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 254 1011 525 572 667 166 464 658 245 529 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.18 0.38 0.00 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.30 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 3325 1483 3233 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 285 691 113 521 629 0 100 383 375 162 496 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1483 1617 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 21.9 6.4 19.0 41.7 0.0 5.3 24.9 22.6 8.2 33.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 21.9 6.4 19.0 41.7 0.0 5.3 24.9 22.6 8.2 33.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 254 1011 525 572 667 166 464 658 245 529 V/C Ratio(X) 1.12 0.68 0.22 0.91 0.94 0.60 0.83 0.57 0.66 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 254 1011 525 593 667 166 477 670 270 569 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.9 36.7 27.1 48.5 35.9 0.0 33.7 41.3 24.8 30.3 40.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 93.5 3.7 0.9 18.0 23.5 0.0 6.0 11.1 1.1 5.2 22.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.6 9.3 2.4 9.0 21.6 0.0 2.4 12.1 8.2 3.6 17.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 125.4 40.4 28.0 66.5 59.4 0.0 39.7 52.4 25.9 35.5 63.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D C E E D D C D E Approach Vol, veh/h 1089 1150 858 658 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.4 62.6 39.4 56.5 Approach LOS E E D E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.2 43.5 9.0 43.3 15.0 52.7 13.2 39.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 33.0 6.0 39.0 12.0 43.0 12.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.0 23.9 7.3 35.1 14.0 43.7 10.2 26.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 3.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 55.9 HCM 6th LOS E Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 705 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy AM - single lane (Site Folder: General)] Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.2.202 New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of Queue Mov ID Turn Mov Class Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Eff. Stop Rate Aver. No. of Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 All MCs 115 3.0 115 3.0 2.120 523.5 LOS F 214.2 5484.4 1.00 6.90 19.23 3.9 8 T1 All MCs 596 3.0 596 3.0 2.120 523.5 LOS F 214.2 5484.4 1.00 6.90 19.23 3.9 18 R2 All MCs 547 3.0 547 3.0 2.120 523.5 LOS F 214.2 5484.4 1.00 6.90 19.23 3.9 Approach 1258 3.0 1258 3.0 2.120 523.5 LOS F 214.2 5484.4 1.00 6.90 19.23 3.9 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 All MCs 479 3.0 479 3.0 1.381 191.1 LOS F 118.1 3024.0 1.00 4.71 10.75 9.0 6 T1 All MCs 711 3.0 711 3.0 1.381 191.1 LOS F 118.1 3024.0 1.00 4.71 10.75 9.0 16 R2 All MCs 223 3.0 223 3.0 0.263 7.0 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.57 0.43 0.57 32.7 Approach 1413 3.0 1413 3.0 1.381 162.6 LOS F 118.1 3024.0 0.93 4.04 9.14 10.1 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 All MCs 155 3.0 155 3.0 0.936 49.7 LOS E 11.8 303.1 0.98 1.51 2.80 19.9 4 T1 All MCs 371 3.0 371 3.0 0.936 49.7 LOS E 11.8 303.1 0.98 1.51 2.80 20.2 14 R2 All MCs 216 3.0 216 3.0 0.298 8.5 LOS A 1.3 33.4 0.64 0.54 0.64 32.0 Approach 742 3.0 742 3.0 0.936 37.7 LOS E 11.8 303.1 0.88 1.23 2.17 22.5 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 All MCs 226 3.0 226 3.0 1.526 262.1 LOS F 104.0 2661.4 1.00 5.12 14.30 7.0 2 T1 All MCs 668 3.0 668 3.0 1.526 262.1 LOS F 104.0 2661.4 1.00 5.12 14.30 7.1 12 R2 All MCs 65 3.0 65 3.0 0.105 7.0 LOS A 0.4 10.1 0.61 0.56 0.61 32.7 Approach 960 3.0 960 3.0 1.526 244.8 LOS F 104.0 2661.4 0.97 4.81 13.37 7.4 All Vehicles 4373 3.0 4373 3.0 2.120 263.0 LOS F 214.2 5484.4 0.95 4.55 11.79 7.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap. Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 4:07:10 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 706 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy PM - single lane (Site Folder: General)] Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.2.202 New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of Queue Mov ID Turn Mov Class Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Eff. Stop Rate Aver. No. of Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 All MCs 100 3.0 100 3.0 1.353 185.9 LOS F 80.4 2059.1 1.00 4.13 10.42 9.1 8 T1 All MCs 383 3.0 383 3.0 1.353 185.9 LOS F 80.4 2059.1 1.00 4.13 10.42 9.1 18 R2 All MCs 375 3.0 375 3.0 1.353 185.9 LOS F 80.4 2059.1 1.00 4.13 10.42 9.1 Approach 858 3.0 858 3.0 1.353 185.9 LOS F 80.4 2059.1 1.00 4.13 10.42 9.1 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 All MCs 521 3.0 521 3.0 1.376 189.8 LOS F 112.9 2889.6 1.00 4.69 10.91 9.0 6 T1 All MCs 629 3.0 629 3.0 1.376 189.8 LOS F 112.9 2889.6 1.00 4.69 10.91 9.1 16 R2 All MCs 137 3.0 137 3.0 0.164 6.0 LOS A 0.7 17.6 0.53 0.41 0.53 33.2 Approach 1287 3.0 1287 3.0 1.376 170.4 LOS F 112.9 2889.6 0.95 4.23 9.80 9.8 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 All MCs 162 3.0 162 3.0 1.169 116.8 LOS F 39.6 1014.0 1.00 2.94 7.34 12.6 4 T1 All MCs 496 3.0 496 3.0 1.169 116.8 LOS F 39.6 1014.0 1.00 2.94 7.34 12.7 14 R2 All MCs 250 3.0 250 3.0 0.331 8.7 LOS A 1.5 38.6 0.64 0.53 0.64 31.9 Approach 908 3.0 908 3.0 1.169 87.0 LOS F 39.6 1014.0 0.90 2.27 5.50 15.1 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 All MCs 285 3.0 285 3.0 1.788 378.2 LOS F 140.6 3598.7 1.00 6.03 17.65 5.2 2 T1 All MCs 691 3.0 691 3.0 1.788 378.2 LOS F 140.6 3598.7 1.00 6.03 17.65 5.2 12 R2 All MCs 113 3.0 113 3.0 0.201 9.0 LOS A 0.8 19.7 0.66 0.62 0.66 31.7 Approach 1089 3.0 1089 3.0 1.788 339.9 LOS F 140.6 3598.7 0.97 5.47 15.89 5.7 All Vehicles 4141 3.0 4141 3.0 1.788 199.9 LOS F 140.6 3598.7 0.95 4.11 10.59 8.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap. Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 4:07:24 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 707 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy AM (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 106 3.0 115 3.0 1.269 157.7 LOS F 59.5 1523.8 1.00 3.79 10.49 10.5 8 T1 548 3.0 596 3.0 1.269 157.7 LOS F 59.5 1523.8 1.00 3.79 10.49 10.5 18 R2 503 3.0 547 3.0 0.801 27.0 LOS D 9.0 230.1 0.88 1.30 2.19 25.6 Approach 1157 3.0 1258 3.0 1.269 100.9 LOS F 59.5 1523.8 0.95 2.71 6.88 14.0 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 441 3.0 479 3.0 0.911 43.1 LOS E 14.4 369.4 0.96 1.65 3.16 21.5 6 T1 654 3.0 711 3.0 0.911 40.5 LOS E 15.3 392.4 0.96 1.68 3.20 22.7 16 R2 205 3.0 223 3.0 0.299 8.3 LOS A 1.2 29.6 0.61 0.61 0.61 32.4 Approach 1300 3.0 1413 3.0 0.911 36.3 LOS E 15.3 392.4 0.90 1.50 2.78 23.3 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 143 3.0 155 3.0 1.170 126.5 LOS F 34.7 887.7 1.00 2.90 7.92 12.2 4 T1 341 3.0 371 3.0 1.170 126.5 LOS F 34.7 887.7 1.00 2.90 7.92 12.2 14 R2 199 3.0 216 3.0 0.316 9.3 LOS A 1.3 32.4 0.64 0.66 0.69 32.1 Approach 683 3.0 742 3.0 1.170 92.3 LOS F 34.7 887.7 0.89 2.25 5.81 14.8 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 208 3.0 226 3.0 0.778 30.0 LOS D 6.9 176.9 0.86 1.22 2.07 24.8 2 T1 615 3.0 668 3.0 0.778 28.1 LOS D 7.2 184.9 0.86 1.22 2.07 25.8 12 R2 60 3.0 65 3.0 0.095 6.3 LOS A 0.3 8.3 0.57 0.56 0.57 33.4 Approach 883 3.0 960 3.0 0.778 27.1 LOS D 7.2 184.9 0.84 1.18 1.96 25.9 All Vehicles 4023 3.0 4373 3.0 1.269 62.4 LOS F 59.5 1523.8 0.90 1.90 4.29 18.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:15:50AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 708 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy PM (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 92 3.0 100 3.0 0.909 47.3 LOS E 11.3 290.1 0.93 1.58 3.18 21.2 8 T1 352 3.0 383 3.0 0.909 47.3 LOS E 11.3 290.1 0.93 1.58 3.18 21.2 18 R2 345 3.0 375 3.0 0.550 14.3 LOS B 3.4 88.1 0.74 0.89 1.22 29.9 Approach 789 3.0 858 3.0 0.909 32.9 LOS D 11.3 290.1 0.85 1.28 2.32 24.2 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 479 3.0 521 3.0 0.859 34.9 LOS D 11.6 296.4 0.93 1.47 2.63 23.1 6 T1 579 3.0 629 3.0 0.859 32.4 LOS D 12.2 312.3 0.93 1.48 2.64 24.7 16 R2 126 3.0 137 3.0 0.178 6.6 LOS A 0.6 16.6 0.56 0.55 0.56 33.2 Approach 1184 3.0 1287 3.0 0.859 30.7 LOS D 12.2 312.3 0.89 1.38 2.42 24.7 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 149 3.0 162 3.0 1.425 227.3 LOS F 71.3 1824.2 1.00 4.28 12.86 8.0 4 T1 456 3.0 496 3.0 1.425 227.3 LOS F 71.3 1824.2 1.00 4.28 12.86 8.0 14 R2 230 3.0 250 3.0 0.343 9.2 LOS A 1.5 37.5 0.63 0.66 0.72 32.1 Approach 835 3.0 908 3.0 1.425 167.3 LOS F 71.3 1824.2 0.90 3.29 9.52 10.0 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 262 3.0 285 3.0 0.892 45.4 LOS E 10.7 274.5 0.92 1.51 2.94 21.2 2 T1 636 3.0 691 3.0 0.892 42.7 LOS E 11.4 291.5 0.92 1.53 2.97 22.2 12 R2 104 3.0 113 3.0 0.176 7.7 LOS A 0.6 15.7 0.61 0.61 0.61 32.7 Approach 1002 3.0 1089 3.0 0.892 39.8 LOS E 11.4 291.5 0.88 1.43 2.72 22.6 All Vehicles 3810 3.0 4141 3.0 1.425 63.5 LOS F 71.3 1824.2 0.88 1.79 4.03 18.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:29:32AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 709 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy AM - N/S RT lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 106 3.0 115 3.0 0.238 10.9 LOS B 0.8 21.2 0.69 0.69 0.69 30.2 8 T1 548 3.0 596 3.0 1.083 89.8 LOS F 29.5 755.2 1.00 2.56 6.33 15.3 18 R2 503 3.0 547 3.0 0.816 28.8 LOS D 9.4 240.4 0.89 1.33 2.30 25.0 Approach 1157 3.0 1258 3.0 1.083 56.1 LOS F 29.5 755.2 0.92 1.85 4.06 19.4 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 441 3.0 479 3.0 1.001 65.4 LOS F 20.9 534.8 1.00 2.06 4.52 17.8 6 T1 654 3.0 711 3.0 1.001 62.1 LOS F 22.6 578.4 1.00 2.12 4.63 18.7 16 R2 205 3.0 223 3.0 0.320 9.2 LOS A 1.3 32.9 0.63 0.65 0.69 32.0 Approach 1300 3.0 1413 3.0 1.001 54.9 LOS F 22.6 578.4 0.94 1.87 3.97 19.6 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 143 3.0 155 3.0 0.403 17.5 LOS C 1.6 41.8 0.80 0.88 1.11 27.8 4 T1 341 3.0 371 3.0 0.833 41.3 LOS E 6.8 175.4 0.92 1.34 2.46 22.6 14 R2 199 3.0 216 3.0 0.321 9.4 LOS A 1.3 33.2 0.64 0.67 0.72 31.9 Approach 683 3.0 742 3.0 0.833 27.0 LOS D 6.8 175.4 0.81 1.05 1.67 25.8 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 208 3.0 226 3.0 0.826 36.6 LOS E 7.9 202.8 0.89 1.32 2.38 23.2 2 T1 615 3.0 668 3.0 0.826 34.3 LOS D 8.3 213.3 0.88 1.32 2.38 24.1 12 R2 60 3.0 65 3.0 0.099 6.6 LOS A 0.3 8.6 0.58 0.58 0.58 33.3 Approach 883 3.0 960 3.0 0.826 33.0 LOS D 8.3 213.3 0.86 1.27 2.26 24.3 All Vehicles 4023 3.0 4373 3.0 1.083 45.7 LOS E 29.5 755.2 0.90 1.59 3.23 21.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:25:00AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 710 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy PM - N/S RT lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 92 3.0 100 3.0 0.217 10.9 LOS B 0.7 18.9 0.70 0.70 0.70 30.2 8 T1 352 3.0 383 3.0 0.729 26.7 LOS D 5.3 134.5 0.84 1.13 1.84 26.4 18 R2 345 3.0 375 3.0 0.562 14.8 LOS B 3.5 90.1 0.74 0.90 1.25 29.6 Approach 789 3.0 858 3.0 0.729 19.7 LOS C 5.3 134.5 0.78 0.98 1.45 28.1 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 479 3.0 521 3.0 0.852 33.7 LOS D 11.3 288.7 0.92 1.45 2.56 23.4 6 T1 579 3.0 629 3.0 0.852 31.3 LOS D 11.9 303.9 0.92 1.46 2.57 25.0 16 R2 126 3.0 137 3.0 0.177 6.5 LOS A 0.6 16.4 0.55 0.55 0.55 33.3 Approach 1184 3.0 1287 3.0 0.852 29.7 LOS D 11.9 303.9 0.88 1.36 2.35 24.9 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 149 3.0 162 3.0 0.404 17.0 LOS C 1.7 42.3 0.79 0.87 1.10 28.0 4 T1 456 3.0 496 3.0 1.074 93.1 LOS F 23.7 606.3 1.00 2.37 5.95 15.0 14 R2 230 3.0 250 3.0 0.343 9.2 LOS A 1.5 37.5 0.63 0.66 0.72 32.0 Approach 835 3.0 908 3.0 1.074 56.4 LOS F 23.7 606.3 0.86 1.63 3.64 19.4 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 262 3.0 285 3.0 1.036 83.5 LOS F 19.4 496.2 1.00 2.13 5.03 15.7 2 T1 636 3.0 691 3.0 1.036 79.7 LOS F 21.3 544.4 1.00 2.19 5.20 16.3 12 R2 104 3.0 113 3.0 0.195 8.6 LOS A 0.7 17.1 0.63 0.63 0.63 32.3 Approach 1002 3.0 1089 3.0 1.036 73.3 LOS F 21.3 544.4 0.96 2.01 4.68 17.0 All Vehicles 3810 3.0 4141 3.0 1.074 44.9 LOS E 23.7 606.3 0.88 1.51 3.06 21.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:27:05AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2045\2045-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 711 APPENDIX F – INTERIM YEAR (2035) CAPACITY CALCULATIONS 712 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 40.3 D 10 36.7 D 9 WB 36.8 D 7 44.1 D 9 NB 27.4 C 15 28.1 C 11 SB 25.6 C 17 25.3 C 14 Intersection 30.4 C --32.4 C -- EB 38.4 D 10 35.6 D 9 WB 36.8 D 8 37.6 D 14 NB 27.3 C 14 28.3 C 11 SB 36.4 D 10 36.5 D 14 Intersection 33.7 C --34.7 C -- South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 19th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard 713 Queues 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 233 93 132 179 330 172 775 246 454 704 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.76 0.18 0.62 0.68 0.48 0.45 0.68 0.30 0.82 0.42 Control Delay 51.7 62.3 5.9 34.1 44.5 11.5 16.7 38.5 4.0 33.4 18.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.7 62.3 5.9 34.1 44.5 11.5 16.7 38.5 4.0 33.4 18.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 118 173 0 46 123 136 50 282 0 216 165 Queue Length 95th (ft) #190 246 34 m74 m155 m166 89 366 51 #403 236 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 266 416 538 214 373 711 408 1141 815 572 1666 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.56 0.17 0.62 0.48 0.46 0.42 0.68 0.30 0.79 0.42 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 714 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 177 214 86 121 165 304 158 713 226 418 506 142 Future Volume (veh/h) 177 214 86 121 165 304 158 713 226 418 506 142 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1709 1750 1709 1709 1723 1750 1723 1750 1750 1723 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 192 233 93 132 179 330 172 775 246 454 550 154 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 315 389 453 262 346 556 460 1303 665 506 1261 352 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.50 0.50 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 3273 1483 1667 2527 705 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 192 233 93 132 179 330 172 775 246 454 355 349 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 1637 1483 1667 1637 1596 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.0 14.6 5.6 6.0 11.2 21.7 7.2 22.4 13.2 18.3 16.7 16.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 14.6 5.6 6.0 11.2 21.7 7.2 22.4 13.2 18.3 16.7 16.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 315 389 453 262 346 556 460 1303 665 506 816 796 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.60 0.21 0.50 0.52 0.59 0.37 0.59 0.37 0.90 0.44 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 315 419 479 262 376 581 498 1303 665 640 816 796 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.6 41.4 30.9 39.6 42.6 29.7 18.5 28.5 21.9 19.8 19.3 19.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 2.1 0.2 1.5 1.2 1.5 0.5 2.0 1.6 13.1 1.7 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 6.5 2.0 1.0 4.8 7.7 2.8 8.9 4.8 8.2 6.4 6.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.0 43.5 31.1 41.1 43.8 31.2 19.0 30.5 23.5 32.9 20.9 21.0 LnGrp LOS D D C D D C B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 518 641 1193 1158 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.3 36.8 27.4 25.6 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.4 52.7 10.0 31.9 13.3 64.8 13.0 28.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 36.1 6.0 29.4 12.0 55.1 9.0 26.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.3 24.4 8.0 16.6 9.2 18.8 11.0 23.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 4.6 0.0 1.4 0.1 4.6 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.4 HCM 6th LOS C 715 Queues 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 204 207 126 214 217 472 101 580 176 411 881 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.71 0.25 0.66 0.75 0.72 0.32 0.47 0.20 0.78 0.55 Control Delay 39.6 59.6 6.0 31.4 50.4 19.3 16.8 32.8 3.5 25.6 23.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.6 59.6 6.0 31.4 50.4 19.3 16.8 32.8 3.5 25.6 23.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 118 154 0 93 149 220 32 185 0 165 243 Queue Length 95th (ft) 170 215 41 m97 m158 m221 66 267 41 #274 340 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 315 428 510 324 370 700 330 1295 880 568 1644 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.48 0.25 0.66 0.59 0.67 0.31 0.45 0.20 0.72 0.54 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 716 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 27: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 188 190 116 197 200 434 93 534 162 378 674 136 Future Volume (veh/h) 188 190 116 197 200 434 93 534 162 378 674 136 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 204 207 126 214 217 472 101 580 176 411 733 148 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 313 429 442 338 370 561 336 1212 647 508 1327 268 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.17 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 3325 1471 1667 2756 556 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 204 207 126 214 217 472 101 580 176 411 442 439 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 1663 1471 1667 1663 1650 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.3 12.2 7.8 9.0 13.4 25.4 4.5 16.1 9.1 17.6 22.5 22.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.3 12.2 7.8 9.0 13.4 25.4 4.5 16.1 9.1 17.6 22.5 22.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 313 429 442 338 370 561 336 1212 647 508 800 794 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.48 0.29 0.63 0.59 0.84 0.30 0.48 0.27 0.81 0.55 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 313 429 442 338 370 561 373 1212 647 587 800 794 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.5 38.8 32.3 37.7 42.6 33.8 22.1 29.4 21.4 19.3 22.0 22.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 0.8 0.4 3.8 2.4 11.0 0.5 1.4 1.0 7.3 2.7 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 5.4 2.8 2.0 6.0 13.9 1.8 6.5 3.3 7.4 9.0 9.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.2 39.6 32.7 41.5 44.9 44.8 22.6 30.7 22.5 26.6 24.7 24.7 LnGrp LOS D D C D D D C C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 537 903 857 1292 Approach Delay, s/veh 36.7 44.1 28.1 25.3 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.4 48.6 13.0 34.0 10.3 62.7 17.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 38.1 9.0 29.4 9.0 55.1 13.0 25.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.6 18.1 11.0 14.2 6.5 24.6 13.3 27.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 4.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.4 HCM 6th LOS C 717 Queues 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 233 93 132 179 330 172 775 246 454 704 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.77 0.18 0.54 0.69 0.55 0.41 0.59 0.28 0.77 0.44 Control Delay 43.6 62.8 6.0 30.0 48.4 14.6 15.0 32.0 5.6 55.3 20.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.6 62.8 6.0 30.0 48.4 14.6 15.0 32.0 5.6 55.3 20.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 173 0 39 124 123 55 255 19 172 176 Queue Length 95th (ft) 175 247 35 61 193 200 93 347 75 223 236 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 295 402 528 243 359 645 433 1317 882 698 1623 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.58 0.18 0.54 0.50 0.51 0.40 0.59 0.28 0.65 0.43 Intersection Summary 718 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 177 214 86 121 165 304 158 713 226 418 506 142 Future Volume (veh/h) 177 214 86 121 165 304 158 713 226 418 506 142 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1709 1750 1709 1709 1723 1750 1723 1750 1750 1723 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 192 233 93 132 179 330 172 775 246 454 550 154 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 0 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 344 392 455 291 349 535 443 1297 686 524 1215 339 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 3273 1483 3233 2527 705 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 192 233 93 132 179 330 172 775 246 454 355 349 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1709 1483 1628 1709 1460 1667 1637 1483 1617 1637 1596 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 14.6 5.6 7.7 11.2 22.2 7.3 22.5 12.8 16.4 17.3 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 14.6 5.6 7.7 11.2 22.2 7.3 22.5 12.8 16.4 17.3 17.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 344 392 455 291 349 535 443 1297 686 524 787 767 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.59 0.20 0.45 0.51 0.62 0.39 0.60 0.36 0.87 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 344 404 466 291 362 546 466 1297 686 701 787 767 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.7 41.3 30.8 35.3 42.4 31.1 18.8 28.7 20.8 49.0 20.7 20.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 2.2 0.2 1.1 1.2 2.0 0.6 2.0 1.5 8.7 1.9 1.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 6.4 2.0 3.1 4.8 8.0 2.8 8.9 4.6 7.1 6.7 6.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.7 43.5 31.0 36.4 43.6 33.2 19.4 30.7 22.2 57.7 22.5 22.6 LnGrp LOS D D C D D C B C C E C C Approach Vol, veh/h 518 641 1193 1158 Approach Delay, s/veh 38.4 36.8 27.3 36.4 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.5 52.4 12.0 32.1 13.3 62.6 15.0 29.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 40.1 8.0 28.4 11.0 55.1 11.0 25.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.4 24.5 9.7 16.6 9.3 19.4 13.0 24.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 5.3 0.0 1.3 0.1 4.6 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.7 HCM 6th LOS C 719 Queues 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 204 207 126 214 217 472 101 580 176 411 881 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.72 0.25 0.67 0.74 0.74 0.32 0.45 0.20 0.73 0.55 Control Delay 41.6 61.4 6.2 32.2 51.8 21.5 16.1 31.1 3.2 54.1 23.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.6 61.4 6.2 32.2 51.8 21.5 16.1 31.1 3.2 54.1 23.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 118 154 0 75 154 197 33 178 0 156 244 Queue Length 95th (ft) 176 222 42 136 240 344 63 264 40 199 330 Internal Link Dist (ft) 379 1964 2610 596 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 140 125 130 350 300 350 Base Capacity (vph) 305 443 495 320 443 695 320 1282 896 704 1642 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.47 0.25 0.67 0.49 0.68 0.32 0.45 0.20 0.58 0.54 Intersection Summary 720 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 8: S 19th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 188 190 116 197 200 434 93 534 162 378 674 136 Future Volume (veh/h) 188 190 116 197 200 434 93 534 162 378 674 136 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 204 207 126 214 217 472 101 580 176 411 733 148 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 322 443 450 376 443 592 312 1198 665 482 1265 255 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.15 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 3325 1471 3233 2756 556 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 204 207 126 214 217 472 101 580 176 411 442 439 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1750 1483 1667 1750 1471 1667 1663 1471 1617 1663 1650 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 12.0 7.8 11.0 12.7 30.4 4.6 16.2 8.9 14.9 23.5 23.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 12.0 7.8 11.0 12.7 30.4 4.6 16.2 8.9 14.9 23.5 23.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 322 443 450 376 443 592 312 1198 665 482 763 758 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.47 0.28 0.57 0.49 0.80 0.32 0.48 0.26 0.85 0.58 0.58 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 322 443 450 376 443 592 312 1198 665 701 763 758 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.5 37.9 31.8 30.8 38.2 31.6 22.9 29.8 20.5 49.8 23.9 23.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.8 0.3 2.0 0.8 7.5 0.6 1.4 1.0 6.9 3.2 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.8 5.3 2.8 4.8 5.5 12.9 1.8 6.5 3.2 6.4 9.5 9.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.5 38.7 32.2 32.8 39.0 39.1 23.5 31.2 21.5 56.7 27.1 27.1 LnGrp LOS C D C C D D C C C E C C Approach Vol, veh/h 537 903 857 1292 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.6 37.6 28.3 36.5 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.9 48.1 15.0 35.0 10.0 60.0 15.0 35.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 35.1 11.0 30.4 6.0 55.1 11.0 30.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.9 18.2 13.0 14.0 6.6 25.5 13.0 32.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 3.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.7 HCM 6th LOS C 721 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 90.1 F 37 63.3 E 32 WB 55.0 D 20 39.6 D 30 NB 147.9 F 38 142.8 F 29 SB 41.9 D 13 109.8 F 27 Intersection 92.0 F --83.9 F -- EB 25.8 C 13 29.6 C 16 WB 20.2 C 7 23.6 C 10 NB 42.0 D 18 38.3 D 13 SB 40.1 D 11 46.7 D 17 Intersection 31.4 C --33.4 C -- EB 107.3 F 57 142.6 F 63 WB 41.5 E 24 163.4 F 87 NB 228.2 F 96 90.7 F 39 SB 20.9 C 6 126.1 F 46 Intersection 115.3 F --133.7 F -- EB 10.0 A 3 14.6 B 4 WB 11.3 B 3 11.9 B 4 NB 17.0 C 7 12.0 B 3 SB 10.2 B 3 22.6 C 6 Intersection 12.5 B --14.9 B -- Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative Kagy Boulevard & South 11th Avenue Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + RT slip, N/S LT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + N/S RT lanes South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard South 11th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard 722 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 783 182 561 151 736 85 324 v/c Ratio 0.33 1.08 1.27 0.75 0.44 1.23 0.75 0.67 Control Delay 16.1 82.1 192.8 25.3 25.7 153.1 62.9 44.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 16.1 82.1 192.8 25.3 25.7 153.1 62.9 44.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 ~662 ~134 130 72 ~696 39 218 Queue Length 95th (ft) m46 #906 #283 489 119 #935 #104 325 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 1296 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 249 724 143 750 350 596 114 486 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 1.08 1.27 0.75 0.43 1.23 0.75 0.67 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 723 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 75 608 112 167 425 91 139 435 242 78 262 36 Future Volume (veh/h) 75 608 112 167 425 91 139 435 242 78 262 36 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1709 1736 1723 1723 1709 1723 1641 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 661 122 182 462 99 151 473 263 85 285 39 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 3 2 8 0 Cap, veh/h 372 604 111 143 596 128 336 373 207 115 445 61 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.87 0.87 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1437 265 1667 1364 292 1641 1040 578 1641 1413 193 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 0 783 182 0 561 151 0 736 85 0 324 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 0 1702 1667 0 1656 1641 0 1619 1641 0 1606 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 50.4 6.0 0.0 16.0 7.2 0.0 43.0 4.0 0.0 20.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 50.4 6.0 0.0 16.0 7.2 0.0 43.0 4.0 0.0 20.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 372 0 715 143 0 723 336 0 580 115 0 505 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 1.10 1.27 0.00 0.78 0.45 0.00 1.27 0.74 0.00 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 372 0 715 143 0 723 373 0 580 115 0 505 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.8 0.0 34.8 28.1 0.0 5.3 25.7 0.0 38.5 34.4 0.0 35.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 62.6 159.2 0.0 6.8 0.9 0.0 134.2 22.4 0.0 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 0.0 32.4 8.4 0.0 3.5 2.9 0.0 38.5 2.4 0.0 8.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.1 0.0 97.4 187.3 0.0 12.1 26.6 0.0 172.7 56.8 0.0 38.0 LnGrp LOS C A F F A B C A F E A D Approach Vol, veh/h 865 743 887 409 Approach Delay, s/veh 90.1 55.0 147.9 41.9 Approach LOS F D F D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 56.0 12.2 42.8 7.0 58.0 7.0 48.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 50.4 12.0 35.0 4.0 52.4 4.0 43.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.0 52.4 9.2 22.8 5.5 18.0 6.0 45.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 92.0 HCM 6th LOS F 724 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 90 712 254 727 168 552 161 520 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.99 1.11 0.88 1.06 1.14 1.02 1.07 Control Delay 19.2 56.3 123.1 33.8 120.0 122.6 107.9 100.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.2 56.3 123.1 33.8 120.0 122.6 107.9 100.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 554 ~167 564 ~92 ~485 ~86 ~440 Queue Length 95th (ft) m49 #782 #353 #734 #238 #708 #223 #658 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 1296 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 Base Capacity (vph) 188 721 229 830 158 485 158 488 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.99 1.11 0.88 1.06 1.14 1.02 1.07 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 725 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 532 123 234 527 142 155 319 189 148 393 86 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 532 123 234 527 142 155 319 189 148 393 86 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 578 134 254 573 154 168 347 205 161 427 93 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 413 577 134 227 647 174 157 292 173 157 394 86 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.42 0.42 0.20 0.97 0.97 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 1374 319 1667 1329 357 1667 1031 609 1667 1392 303 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 0 712 254 0 727 168 0 552 161 0 520 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 0 1693 1667 0 1686 1667 0 1640 1667 0 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 50.4 12.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 0.0 34.0 7.0 0.0 34.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 50.4 12.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 0.0 34.0 7.0 0.0 34.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.18 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 413 0 711 227 0 820 157 0 465 157 0 480 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 1.00 1.12 0.00 0.89 1.07 0.00 1.19 1.02 0.00 1.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 413 0 711 227 0 820 157 0 465 157 0 480 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.75 0.00 0.75 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.0 0.0 34.8 31.7 0.0 1.0 36.8 0.0 43.0 36.8 0.0 43.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 34.1 88.3 0.0 10.6 91.2 0.0 104.3 78.2 0.0 65.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 26.6 8.4 0.0 3.0 5.6 0.0 27.2 5.0 0.0 22.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.2 0.0 68.9 120.0 0.0 11.6 128.0 0.0 147.3 115.1 0.0 108.1 LnGrp LOS B A F F A B F A F F A F Approach Vol, veh/h 802 981 720 681 Approach Delay, s/veh 63.3 39.6 142.8 109.8 Approach LOS E D F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 56.0 10.0 39.0 7.0 64.0 10.0 39.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 50.4 7.0 34.0 4.0 58.4 7.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.0 52.4 9.0 36.0 5.7 12.0 9.0 36.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 83.9 HCM 6th LOS F 726 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 783 182 561 151 473 263 85 285 39 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.60 0.53 0.39 0.46 0.86 0.36 0.43 0.64 0.06 Control Delay 14.5 24.2 16.4 15.0 26.9 54.2 12.6 29.6 44.1 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.5 24.2 16.4 15.0 26.9 54.2 12.6 29.6 44.1 0.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 110 37 70 69 338 75 37 186 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m50 325 118 159 115 445 113 69 267 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 600 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 200 100 Base Capacity (vph) 413 1302 391 1458 331 643 774 196 540 631 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.60 0.47 0.38 0.46 0.74 0.34 0.43 0.53 0.06 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 727 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 75 608 112 167 425 91 139 435 242 78 262 36 Future Volume (veh/h) 75 608 112 167 425 91 139 435 242 78 262 36 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1750 1750 1750 1709 1736 1723 1723 1709 1723 1641 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 661 122 182 462 99 151 473 263 85 285 39 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 3 2 8 0 Cap, veh/h 442 1252 231 379 1281 273 303 528 553 155 434 453 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 2803 517 1667 2664 567 1641 1723 1448 1641 1641 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 392 391 182 280 281 151 473 263 85 285 39 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1663 1657 1667 1624 1607 1641 1723 1448 1641 1641 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.2 20.5 20.5 6.8 13.0 13.2 7.8 31.5 16.5 4.0 18.5 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2 20.5 20.5 6.8 13.0 13.2 7.8 31.5 16.5 4.0 18.5 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 442 742 740 379 781 773 303 528 553 155 434 453 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.53 0.53 0.48 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.90 0.48 0.55 0.66 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 471 742 740 489 781 773 303 646 652 155 547 555 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.0 24.0 24.1 17.2 19.5 19.6 29.4 39.8 28.0 37.1 39.3 29.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 2.7 2.7 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.3 13.3 0.6 4.0 1.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 8.4 8.4 2.6 5.1 5.1 3.2 15.3 5.9 0.9 7.8 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.2 26.7 26.8 18.1 20.8 20.9 30.7 53.1 28.7 41.2 41.2 29.8 LnGrp LOS B C C B C C C D C D D C Approach Vol, veh/h 865 743 887 409 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.8 20.2 42.0 40.1 Approach LOS C C D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.1 59.2 12.0 36.8 7.9 63.3 7.0 41.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 37.4 9.0 40.0 7.0 47.4 4.0 45.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 22.5 9.8 20.5 5.2 15.2 6.0 33.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.2 0.0 1.8 0.0 3.6 0.0 3.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.4 HCM 6th LOS C 728 Queues 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 90 712 254 727 168 347 205 161 427 93 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.63 0.65 0.53 0.69 0.69 0.27 0.53 0.85 0.15 Control Delay 22.9 34.6 25.5 21.9 38.0 44.8 6.3 28.6 56.4 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.9 34.6 25.5 21.9 38.0 44.8 6.3 28.6 56.4 6.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 94 115 170 83 238 30 79 310 7 Queue Length 95th (ft) m86 #386 212 250 120 316 59 116 403 37 Internal Link Dist (ft) 602 600 406 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 150 220 200 200 100 Base Capacity (vph) 332 1139 445 1382 243 612 827 304 612 635 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.63 0.57 0.53 0.69 0.57 0.25 0.53 0.70 0.15 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 729 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 33: S 11th Ave & W Kagy Blvd 01/23/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 532 123 234 527 142 155 319 189 148 393 86 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 532 123 234 527 142 155 319 189 148 393 86 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 578 134 254 573 154 168 347 205 161 427 93 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 363 1072 248 413 1193 320 232 476 561 279 476 472 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 2681 620 1667 2593 695 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 358 354 254 367 360 168 347 205 161 427 93 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1638 1667 1663 1625 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 19.8 19.9 10.3 18.3 18.4 8.7 21.6 12.0 8.3 28.2 5.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 19.8 19.9 10.3 18.3 18.4 8.7 21.6 12.0 8.3 28.2 5.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 363 665 655 413 765 748 232 476 561 279 476 472 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.54 0.54 0.61 0.48 0.48 0.72 0.73 0.37 0.58 0.90 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 384 665 655 541 765 748 232 613 677 279 613 587 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.1 27.5 27.6 19.1 22.4 22.5 31.7 39.7 26.9 30.0 42.1 29.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 3.1 3.2 1.5 2.1 2.2 10.6 3.2 0.4 2.9 13.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 8.3 8.2 4.0 7.5 7.3 4.2 9.8 4.4 3.6 14.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.4 30.7 30.8 20.6 24.6 24.7 42.4 42.8 27.3 32.9 55.5 30.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C D D C C E C Approach Vol, veh/h 802 981 720 681 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.6 23.6 38.3 46.7 Approach LOS C C D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.8 53.6 13.0 37.6 8.5 60.8 13.0 37.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.6 3.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 29.4 10.0 42.0 7.0 44.4 10.0 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 21.9 10.7 30.2 5.8 20.4 10.3 23.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 2.6 0.0 2.4 0.0 4.6 0.0 2.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.4 HCM 6th LOS C 730 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy AM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 139 3.0 151 3.0 1.450 228.2 LOS F 95.2 2438.4 1.00 6.25 12.01 7.1 8 T1 435 3.0 473 3.0 1.450 228.2 LOS F 95.2 2438.4 1.00 6.25 12.01 7.1 18 R2 242 3.0 263 3.0 1.450 228.2 LOS F 95.2 2438.4 1.00 6.25 12.01 7.1 Approach 816 3.0 887 3.0 1.450 228.2 LOS F 95.2 2438.4 1.00 6.25 12.01 7.1 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 167 3.0 182 3.0 0.946 41.5 LOS E 23.2 594.6 1.00 1.78 3.06 20.3 6 T1 425 3.0 462 3.0 0.946 41.5 LOS E 23.2 594.6 1.00 1.78 3.06 20.5 16 R2 91 3.0 99 3.0 0.946 41.5 LOS E 23.2 594.6 1.00 1.78 3.06 20.4 Approach 683 3.0 742 3.0 0.946 41.5 LOS E 23.2 594.6 1.00 1.78 3.06 20.4 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 78 3.0 85 3.0 0.680 20.9 LOS C 5.2 132.9 0.86 1.07 1.45 20.0 4 T1 262 3.0 285 3.0 0.680 20.9 LOS C 5.2 132.9 0.86 1.07 1.45 20.1 14 R2 36 3.0 39 3.0 0.680 20.9 LOS C 5.2 132.9 0.86 1.07 1.45 20.1 Approach 376 3.0 409 3.0 0.680 20.9 LOS C 5.2 132.9 0.86 1.07 1.45 20.1 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 75 3.0 82 3.0 1.167 107.3 LOS F 56.4 1445.0 1.00 3.33 6.83 12.8 2 T1 608 3.0 661 3.0 1.167 107.3 LOS F 56.4 1445.0 1.00 3.33 6.83 12.9 12 R2 112 3.0 122 3.0 1.167 107.3 LOS F 56.4 1445.0 1.00 3.33 6.83 12.9 Approach 795 3.0 864 3.0 1.167 107.3 LOS F 56.4 1445.0 1.00 3.33 6.83 12.9 All Vehicles 2670 3.0 2902 3.0 1.450 115.3 LOS F 95.2 2438.4 0.98 3.51 6.69 11.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, January 23, 2023 4:19:25 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 731 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy PM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 155 3.0 168 3.0 1.109 90.7 LOS F 38.3 980.0 1.00 3.34 5.78 12.4 8 T1 319 3.0 347 3.0 1.109 90.7 LOS F 38.3 980.0 1.00 3.34 5.78 12.4 18 R2 189 3.0 205 3.0 1.109 90.7 LOS F 38.3 980.0 1.00 3.34 5.78 12.4 Approach 663 3.0 721 3.0 1.109 90.7 LOS F 38.3 980.0 1.00 3.34 5.78 12.4 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 234 3.0 254 3.0 1.308 163.4 LOS F 86.7 2220.4 1.00 4.35 9.33 9.7 6 T1 527 3.0 573 3.0 1.308 163.4 LOS F 86.7 2220.4 1.00 4.35 9.33 9.8 16 R2 142 3.0 154 3.0 1.308 163.4 LOS F 86.7 2220.4 1.00 4.35 9.33 9.8 Approach 903 3.0 982 3.0 1.308 163.4 LOS F 86.7 2220.4 1.00 4.35 9.33 9.8 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 148 3.0 161 3.0 1.196 126.1 LOS F 46.0 1177.5 1.00 4.01 7.49 10.4 4 T1 393 3.0 427 3.0 1.196 126.1 LOS F 46.0 1177.5 1.00 4.01 7.49 10.5 14 R2 86 3.0 93 3.0 1.196 126.1 LOS F 46.0 1177.5 1.00 4.01 7.49 10.4 Approach 627 3.0 682 3.0 1.196 126.1 LOS F 46.0 1177.5 1.00 4.01 7.49 10.4 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 83 3.0 90 3.0 1.248 142.6 LOS F 62.1 1588.9 1.00 3.79 8.55 10.7 2 T1 532 3.0 578 3.0 1.248 142.6 LOS F 62.1 1588.9 1.00 3.79 8.55 10.8 12 R2 123 3.0 134 3.0 1.248 142.6 LOS F 62.1 1588.9 1.00 3.79 8.55 10.7 Approach 738 3.0 802 3.0 1.248 142.6 LOS F 62.1 1588.9 1.00 3.79 8.55 10.8 All Vehicles 2931 3.0 3186 3.0 1.308 133.7 LOS F 86.7 2220.4 1.00 3.91 7.94 10.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 10, 2023 3:12:47 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 732 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy AM - 4 RT, N/S LT lanes (Site Folder: General)] Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.2.202 New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of Queue Mov ID Turn Mov Class Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Eff. Stop Rate Aver. No. of Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 All MCs 151 3.0 151 3.0 0.261 9.7 LOS A 0.9 24.1 0.65 0.62 0.65 21.5 8 T1 All MCs 473 3.0 473 3.0 0.739 23.2 LOS C 6.1 155.8 0.85 1.19 1.70 19.9 18 R2 All MCs 263 3.0 263 3.0 0.381 10.2 LOS B 1.7 43.4 0.66 0.67 0.81 22.1 Approach 887 3.0 887 3.0 0.739 17.0 LOS C 6.1 155.8 0.76 0.94 1.26 20.8 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 All MCs 182 3.0 182 3.0 0.469 12.5 LOS B 2.5 63.9 0.71 0.74 0.98 26.7 6 T1 All MCs 462 3.0 462 3.0 0.469 11.9 LOS B 2.5 63.9 0.69 0.72 0.96 28.0 16 R2 All MCs 99 3.0 99 3.0 0.134 6.3 LOS A 0.5 13.6 0.57 0.48 0.57 30.0 Approach 742 3.0 742 3.0 0.469 11.3 LOS B 2.5 63.9 0.68 0.69 0.91 27.9 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 All MCs 85 3.0 85 3.0 0.142 7.7 LOS A 0.5 12.4 0.60 0.57 0.60 21.8 4 T1 All MCs 285 3.0 285 3.0 0.431 11.6 LOS B 2.1 52.7 0.69 0.75 0.92 22.1 14 R2 All MCs 39 3.0 39 3.0 0.050 5.1 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.50 0.43 0.50 23.3 Approach 409 3.0 409 3.0 0.431 10.2 LOS B 2.1 52.7 0.65 0.68 0.82 22.2 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 All MCs 82 3.0 82 3.0 0.466 11.0 LOS B 2.7 69.5 0.67 0.65 0.90 27.8 2 T1 All MCs 661 3.0 661 3.0 0.466 10.6 LOS B 2.7 69.5 0.66 0.64 0.88 28.6 12 R2 All MCs 122 3.0 122 3.0 0.150 6.0 LOS A 0.6 15.8 0.54 0.43 0.54 30.1 Approach 864 3.0 864 3.0 0.466 10.0 LOS A 2.7 69.5 0.64 0.61 0.84 28.7 All Vehicles 2902 3.0 2902 3.0 0.739 12.5 LOS B 6.1 155.8 0.69 0.74 0.98 24.6 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap. Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Saturday, February 11, 2023 7:47:17 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 733 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [11th & Kagy PM - 4 RT, N/S LT lanes (Site Folder: General)] Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.2.202 New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of Queue Mov ID Turn Mov Class Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Eff. Stop Rate Aver. No. of Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 11th Ave 3 L2 All MCs 168 3.0 168 3.0 0.292 10.2 LOS B 1.1 28.1 0.66 0.65 0.70 21.4 8 T1 All MCs 347 3.0 347 3.0 0.543 14.7 LOS B 3.0 77.9 0.74 0.88 1.14 21.5 18 R2 All MCs 205 3.0 205 3.0 0.295 8.8 LOS A 1.1 28.4 0.62 0.57 0.63 22.5 Approach 721 3.0 721 3.0 0.543 12.0 LOS B 3.0 77.9 0.69 0.74 0.89 21.7 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 All MCs 254 3.0 254 3.0 0.547 13.4 LOS B 3.6 93.3 0.73 0.78 1.11 26.3 6 T1 All MCs 573 3.0 573 3.0 0.547 12.8 LOS B 3.7 94.0 0.72 0.76 1.09 27.7 16 R2 All MCs 154 3.0 154 3.0 0.184 6.2 LOS A 0.8 20.1 0.54 0.42 0.54 30.1 Approach 982 3.0 982 3.0 0.547 11.9 LOS B 3.7 94.0 0.69 0.71 1.01 27.7 North: S 11th Ave 7 L2 All MCs 161 3.0 161 3.0 0.329 12.5 LOS B 1.3 32.1 0.70 0.76 0.83 20.9 4 T1 All MCs 427 3.0 427 3.0 0.783 29.8 LOS D 6.0 154.3 0.87 1.30 1.86 18.8 14 R2 All MCs 93 3.0 93 3.0 0.135 6.7 LOS A 0.5 11.7 0.56 0.51 0.56 23.0 Approach 682 3.0 682 3.0 0.783 22.6 LOS C 6.0 154.3 0.79 1.06 1.44 19.8 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 All MCs 90 3.0 90 3.0 0.556 16.6 LOS C 3.1 80.2 0.76 0.88 1.19 25.9 2 T1 All MCs 578 3.0 578 3.0 0.556 15.8 LOS C 3.2 81.0 0.76 0.87 1.18 26.8 12 R2 All MCs 134 3.0 134 3.0 0.209 8.1 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.64 0.57 0.64 29.3 Approach 802 3.0 802 3.0 0.556 14.6 LOS B 3.2 81.0 0.74 0.82 1.09 27.1 All Vehicles 3186 3.0 3186 3.0 0.783 14.9 LOS B 6.0 154.3 0.72 0.82 1.10 24.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap. Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Saturday, February 11, 2023 7:48:03 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 734 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 0.1 A 4 2.0 A 8 WB 1.4 A 24 2.4 A 23 NB 26.3 C 1 20.7 C 2 SB 33.0 C 2 27.9 C 3 Intersection 2.6 A --6.0 A -- EB 3.1 A 3 5.7 A 3 WB 6.6 A 12 9.5 A 11 NB 26.3 C 1 21.8 C 2 SB 24.3 C 1 24.8 C 3 Intersection 5.8 A --10.0 B -- EB 12.4 B 11 11.9 B 11 WB 16.3 C 15 11.1 B 7 NB 7.8 A 1 9.3 A 1 SB 7.9 A 1 13.2 B 3 Intersection 13.8 B --11.7 B -- EB 6.0 A 3 5.9 A 2 WB 6.9 A 2 5.8 A 2 NB 6.5 A 1 7.6 A 1 SB 6.7 A 1 10.5 B 2 Intersection 6.5 A --6.5 A -- Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative South 7th Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak 735 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 209 749 26 779 13 23 73 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.52 0.05 0.55 0.07 0.17 0.32 Control Delay 2.7 2.5 3.5 11.8 20.6 26.3 11.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.7 2.5 3.5 11.8 20.6 26.3 11.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 44 4 488 3 8 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m19 m82 m7 578 16 25 30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1296 1326 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 481 1443 503 1422 491 360 497 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.52 0.05 0.55 0.03 0.06 0.15 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 736 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 192 663 26 24 656 61 1 7 4 14 7 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 192 663 26 24 656 61 1 7 4 14 7 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1736 1695 1750 1723 1723 1750 1750 1750 1518 1559 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 209 721 28 26 713 66 1 8 4 15 8 73 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 17 14 0 Cap, veh/h 673 1304 51 689 1220 113 69 76 36 148 51 106 Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 704 1660 64 724 1553 144 67 1071 506 687 715 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 209 0 749 26 0 779 13 0 0 23 0 73 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 704 0 1725 724 0 1697 1644 0 0 1402 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.08 0.08 0.31 0.65 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 673 0 1355 689 0 1333 182 0 0 199 0 106 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.00 0.55 0.04 0.00 0.58 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 673 0 1355 689 0 1333 555 0 0 509 0 445 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.33 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.77 0.00 0.77 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 27.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 7.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.5 26.3 0.0 0.0 26.5 0.0 35.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A D Approach Vol, veh/h 958 805 13 96 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.1 1.4 26.3 33.0 Approach LOS A A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 51.7 8.3 51.7 8.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.0 4.6 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.4 18.0 33.4 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 4.9 2.0 2.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.2 0.2 6.6 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 2.6 HCM 6th LOS A 737 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 90 855 7 772 54 39 225 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.69 0.02 0.62 0.21 0.21 0.60 Control Delay 2.6 5.2 3.0 12.1 11.8 23.4 13.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.6 5.2 3.0 12.1 11.8 23.4 13.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 139 0 389 5 13 13 Queue Length 95th (ft) m12 m177 m2 552 27 32 59 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1296 1326 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 375 1245 320 1243 484 395 576 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.69 0.02 0.62 0.11 0.10 0.39 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 738 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 782 5 6 691 19 6 6 37 29 6 207 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 782 5 6 691 19 6 6 37 29 6 207 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 850 5 7 751 21 7 7 40 32 7 225 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 595 1164 7 459 1134 32 81 60 210 325 60 277 Arrive On Green 0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 709 1738 10 656 1694 47 72 321 1120 1155 321 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 0 855 7 0 772 54 0 0 39 0 225 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 709 0 1748 656 0 1741 1513 0 0 1476 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 9.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 9.2 9.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.03 0.13 0.74 0.82 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 595 0 1171 459 0 1166 351 0 0 385 0 277 V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.00 0.73 0.02 0.00 0.66 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 595 0 1171 459 0 1166 516 0 0 547 0 445 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.33 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.82 0.00 0.82 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 1.1 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 20.3 0.0 23.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 5.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 1.2 0.0 2.0 1.1 0.0 2.4 20.7 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 29.2 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A C Approach Vol, veh/h 945 779 54 264 Approach Delay, s/veh 2.0 2.4 20.7 27.9 Approach LOS A A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 44.8 15.2 44.8 15.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.0 4.6 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.4 18.0 33.4 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.2 10.7 11.3 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.4 0.6 5.7 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.0 HCM 6th LOS A 739 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 02/13/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 209 749 26 779 13 23 73 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.24 0.06 0.34 0.07 0.14 0.25 Control Delay 3.2 0.9 3.6 4.8 20.9 25.0 6.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.2 0.9 3.6 4.8 20.9 25.0 6.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 0 1 15 3 8 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 56 m12 282 16 25 20 Internal Link Dist (ft) 616 385 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 632 3100 468 2351 181 170 295 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.24 0.06 0.33 0.07 0.14 0.25 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 740 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 02/13/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 192 663 26 24 656 61 1 7 4 14 7 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 192 663 26 24 656 61 1 7 4 14 7 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1736 1695 1750 1723 1723 1750 1750 1750 1518 1559 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 209 721 28 26 713 66 1 8 4 15 8 73 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 17 14 0 Cap, veh/h 611 2440 95 571 1886 174 69 75 35 147 50 223 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.75 0.75 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 3238 126 724 3029 280 68 1070 506 684 718 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 209 367 382 26 385 394 13 0 0 23 0 73 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1650 1714 724 1637 1672 1644 0 0 1403 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 4.2 4.2 0.8 7.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 4.2 4.2 0.8 7.0 7.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.17 0.08 0.31 0.65 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 611 1243 1291 571 1019 1041 179 0 0 197 0 223 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 616 1243 1291 571 1019 1041 201 0 0 215 0 243 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.3 2.3 2.3 4.4 5.6 5.6 26.2 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.2 1.1 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.1 2.0 2.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.7 3.0 2.9 4.6 6.7 6.6 26.3 0.0 0.0 26.6 0.0 23.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A C Approach Vol, veh/h 958 805 13 96 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.1 6.6 26.3 24.3 Approach LOS A A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 50.8 9.2 7.8 43.0 9.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.6 5.0 3.0 5.6 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 44.4 5.0 5.0 36.4 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 4.6 4.3 9.0 2.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.8 HCM 6th LOS A 741 Queues 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 02/13/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 90 855 7 772 54 39 225 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.32 0.02 0.38 0.25 0.25 0.46 Control Delay 1.9 2.2 6.5 9.3 14.1 27.1 8.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.9 2.2 6.5 9.3 14.1 27.1 8.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 108 1 188 5 13 15 Queue Length 95th (ft) m13 56 m6 258 30 36 53 Internal Link Dist (ft) 616 385 218 664 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 130 115 Base Capacity (vph) 566 2689 361 2072 282 212 484 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.32 0.02 0.37 0.19 0.18 0.46 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 742 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 30: W Kagy Blvd & S 7th Ave 02/13/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 782 5 6 691 19 6 6 37 29 6 207 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 782 5 6 691 19 6 6 37 29 6 207 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 850 5 7 751 21 7 7 40 32 7 225 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 516 2225 13 475 1790 50 80 53 187 301 55 343 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.66 0.66 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 3389 20 656 3304 92 76 316 1119 1153 329 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 417 438 7 378 394 54 0 0 39 0 225 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1746 656 1663 1733 1511 0 0 1482 0 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 6.9 6.9 0.3 8.1 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 6.9 6.9 0.3 8.1 8.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 8.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.05 0.13 0.74 0.82 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 516 1092 1147 475 901 939 320 0 0 356 0 343 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.42 0.42 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 547 1092 1147 475 901 939 320 0 0 356 0 343 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.1 4.7 4.7 6.4 8.1 8.1 21.6 0.0 0.0 21.3 0.0 20.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.4 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 4.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.9 2.0 0.0 2.7 2.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.2 5.7 5.7 6.4 9.6 9.5 21.8 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 25.4 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C A A C A C Approach Vol, veh/h 945 779 54 264 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.7 9.5 21.8 24.8 Approach LOS A A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 45.0 15.0 6.9 38.1 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.6 5.0 3.0 5.6 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.4 10.0 5.0 31.4 10.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.9 10.2 3.2 10.1 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.2 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.0 HCM 6th LOS B 743 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy AM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.027 7.8 LOS A 0.1 2.4 0.64 0.59 0.64 22.7 8 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.027 7.8 LOS A 0.1 2.4 0.64 0.59 0.64 22.8 18 R2 4 3.0 4 3.0 0.027 7.8 LOS A 0.1 2.4 0.64 0.59 0.64 22.8 Approach 12 3.0 13 3.0 0.027 7.8 LOS A 0.1 2.4 0.64 0.59 0.64 22.8 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 24 3.0 26 3.0 0.759 16.3 LOS C 15.0 384.7 0.86 0.80 1.35 26.4 6 T1 656 3.0 713 3.0 0.759 16.3 LOS C 15.0 384.7 0.86 0.80 1.35 26.8 16 R2 61 3.0 66 3.0 0.759 16.3 LOS C 15.0 384.7 0.86 0.80 1.35 26.6 Approach 741 3.0 805 3.0 0.759 16.3 LOS C 15.0 384.7 0.86 0.80 1.35 26.8 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 14 3.0 15 3.0 0.159 7.9 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.64 0.58 0.64 22.4 4 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.159 7.9 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.64 0.58 0.64 22.6 14 R2 67 3.0 73 3.0 0.159 7.9 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.64 0.58 0.64 22.6 Approach 88 3.0 96 3.0 0.159 7.9 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.64 0.58 0.64 22.5 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 192 3.0 209 3.0 0.752 12.4 LOS B 10.6 272.5 0.52 0.18 0.52 27.3 2 T1 663 3.0 721 3.0 0.752 12.4 LOS B 10.6 272.5 0.52 0.18 0.52 27.8 12 R2 26 3.0 28 3.0 0.752 12.4 LOS B 10.6 272.5 0.52 0.18 0.52 27.6 Approach 881 3.0 958 3.0 0.752 12.4 LOS B 10.6 272.5 0.52 0.18 0.52 27.7 All Vehicles 1722 3.0 1872 3.0 0.759 13.8 LOS B 15.0 384.7 0.67 0.47 0.88 26.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, January 23, 2023 4:23:46 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 744 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy PM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.115 9.3 LOS A 0.4 10.3 0.67 0.67 0.67 22.2 8 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.115 9.3 LOS A 0.4 10.3 0.67 0.67 0.67 22.3 18 R2 37 3.0 40 3.0 0.115 9.3 LOS A 0.4 10.3 0.67 0.67 0.67 22.3 Approach 49 3.0 53 3.0 0.115 9.3 LOS A 0.4 10.3 0.67 0.67 0.67 22.3 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.650 11.1 LOS B 6.2 159.3 0.55 0.25 0.55 28.2 6 T1 691 3.0 751 3.0 0.650 11.1 LOS B 6.2 159.3 0.55 0.25 0.55 28.6 16 R2 19 3.0 21 3.0 0.650 11.1 LOS B 6.2 159.3 0.55 0.25 0.55 28.4 Approach 716 3.0 778 3.0 0.650 11.1 LOS B 6.2 159.3 0.55 0.25 0.55 28.6 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 29 3.0 32 3.0 0.449 13.2 LOS B 2.4 60.3 0.75 0.81 0.99 21.3 4 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.449 13.2 LOS B 2.4 60.3 0.75 0.81 0.99 21.5 14 R2 207 3.0 225 3.0 0.449 13.2 LOS B 2.4 60.3 0.75 0.81 0.99 21.4 Approach 242 3.0 263 3.0 0.449 13.2 LOS B 2.4 60.3 0.75 0.81 0.99 21.4 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 86 3.0 93 3.0 0.741 11.9 LOS B 10.3 262.9 0.48 0.16 0.48 27.7 2 T1 782 3.0 850 3.0 0.741 11.9 LOS B 10.3 262.9 0.48 0.16 0.48 28.2 12 R2 5 3.0 5 3.0 0.741 11.9 LOS B 10.3 262.9 0.48 0.16 0.48 28.0 Approach 873 3.0 949 3.0 0.741 11.9 LOS B 10.3 262.9 0.48 0.16 0.48 28.1 All Vehicles 1880 3.0 2043 3.0 0.741 11.7 LOS B 10.3 262.9 0.55 0.29 0.58 27.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, January 23, 2023 4:25:46 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 745 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy AM - dual E/W lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.023 6.5 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.58 0.52 0.58 23.0 8 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.023 6.5 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.58 0.52 0.58 23.1 18 R2 4 3.0 4 3.0 0.023 6.5 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.58 0.52 0.58 23.1 Approach 12 3.0 13 3.0 0.023 6.5 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.58 0.52 0.58 23.1 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 24 3.0 26 3.0 0.367 7.1 LOS A 1.8 47.0 0.44 0.27 0.44 29.5 6 T1 656 3.0 713 3.0 0.367 7.0 LOS A 1.8 47.0 0.43 0.26 0.43 30.1 16 R2 61 3.0 66 3.0 0.367 6.8 LOS A 1.8 46.0 0.42 0.25 0.42 30.0 Approach 741 3.0 805 3.0 0.367 6.9 LOS A 1.8 47.0 0.43 0.26 0.43 30.1 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 14 3.0 15 3.0 0.138 6.7 LOS A 0.5 11.9 0.57 0.51 0.57 22.7 4 T1 7 3.0 8 3.0 0.138 6.7 LOS A 0.5 11.9 0.57 0.51 0.57 22.9 14 R2 67 3.0 73 3.0 0.138 6.7 LOS A 0.5 11.9 0.57 0.51 0.57 22.8 Approach 88 3.0 96 3.0 0.138 6.7 LOS A 0.5 11.9 0.57 0.51 0.57 22.8 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 192 3.0 209 3.0 0.372 6.1 LOS A 2.1 53.0 0.21 0.07 0.21 29.1 2 T1 663 3.0 721 3.0 0.372 6.0 LOS A 2.1 53.0 0.20 0.07 0.20 30.2 12 R2 26 3.0 28 3.0 0.372 5.9 LOS A 2.0 51.5 0.19 0.07 0.19 30.4 Approach 881 3.0 958 3.0 0.372 6.0 LOS A 2.1 53.0 0.20 0.07 0.20 30.0 All Vehicles 1722 3.0 1872 3.0 0.372 6.5 LOS A 2.1 53.0 0.32 0.18 0.32 29.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, January 23, 2023 4:24:01 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 746 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7th & Kagy PM - dual E/W lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 7th Ave 3 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.095 7.6 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.60 0.60 0.60 22.6 8 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.095 7.6 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.60 0.60 0.60 22.7 18 R2 37 3.0 40 3.0 0.095 7.6 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.60 0.60 0.60 22.7 Approach 49 3.0 53 3.0 0.095 7.6 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.60 0.60 0.60 22.7 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.318 5.9 LOS A 1.6 40.8 0.29 0.13 0.29 30.1 6 T1 691 3.0 751 3.0 0.318 5.8 LOS A 1.6 40.8 0.28 0.13 0.28 30.7 16 R2 19 3.0 21 3.0 0.318 5.7 LOS A 1.6 39.7 0.27 0.12 0.27 30.5 Approach 716 3.0 778 3.0 0.318 5.8 LOS A 1.6 40.8 0.28 0.13 0.28 30.6 North: S 7th Ave 7 L2 29 3.0 32 3.0 0.387 10.5 LOS B 1.7 44.8 0.66 0.69 0.84 21.9 4 T1 6 3.0 7 3.0 0.387 10.5 LOS B 1.7 44.8 0.66 0.69 0.84 22.0 14 R2 207 3.0 225 3.0 0.387 10.5 LOS B 1.7 44.8 0.66 0.69 0.84 22.0 Approach 242 3.0 263 3.0 0.387 10.5 LOS B 1.7 44.8 0.66 0.69 0.84 22.0 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 83 3.0 90 3.0 0.366 6.0 LOS A 2.0 51.8 0.19 0.06 0.19 29.6 2 T1 782 3.0 850 3.0 0.366 5.9 LOS A 2.0 51.8 0.19 0.06 0.19 30.5 12 R2 5 3.0 5 3.0 0.366 5.8 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.18 0.06 0.18 30.4 Approach 870 3.0 946 3.0 0.366 5.9 LOS A 2.0 51.8 0.19 0.06 0.19 30.4 All Vehicles 1877 3.0 2040 3.0 0.387 6.5 LOS A 2.0 51.8 0.29 0.18 0.32 28.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, January 23, 2023 4:34:55 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 747 Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) Avg Delay (s/veh) LOS 95th % Queue (veh) EB 20.1 C 21 12.9 B 28 WB 27.5 C 20 23.5 C 18 NB 45.9 D 21 44.8 D 12 SB 46.9 D 10 54.8 D 15 Intersection 34.1 C --30.2 C -- EB 30.0 C 9 30.4 C 11 WB 25.7 C 10 44.5 D 18 NB 43.0 D 20 40.9 D 12 SB 34.7 C 10 51.5 D 14 Intersection 33.5 C --40.6 D -- EB 37.8 E 17 164.5 F 73 WB 51.8 F 39 49.5 E 35 NB 290.2 F 115 66.8 F 23 SB 17.1 C 5 34.5 D 10 Intersection 110.8 F --82.2 F -- EB 11.6 B 3 19.5 C 5 WB 15.6 C 5 12.0 B 4 NB 14.6 B 6 11.8 B 3 SB 11.1 B 2 13.8 B 4 Intersection 13.7 B --14.5 B -- South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Five-Lane Alternative + SB/NB RT, LT lanes South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Approach Interim Year (2035) AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Control Signalized - Five-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane Intersection Control Signalized - Three-Lane Alternative South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard Intersection Control Roundabout - Three-Lane Alternative + SB RT lane South Willson Avenue & Kagy Boulevard 748 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 157 495 53 321 557 198 98 454 365 127 250 155 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.82 0.07 0.86 0.75 0.27 0.28 0.92 0.46 0.65 0.50 0.29 Control Delay 18.3 36.4 2.2 40.7 35.7 4.6 25.5 66.7 11.7 43.8 39.0 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.3 36.4 2.2 40.7 35.7 4.6 25.5 66.7 11.7 43.8 39.0 6.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 45 309 1 139 355 7 46 332 86 61 158 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 #511 m8 #277 485 50 86 #513 162 #144 240 49 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1326 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 150 Base Capacity (vph) 293 627 736 378 777 753 355 525 804 195 519 554 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.79 0.07 0.85 0.72 0.26 0.28 0.86 0.45 0.65 0.48 0.28 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 749 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/25/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:10 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 144 455 49 295 512 182 90 418 336 117 230 143 Future Volume (veh/h) 144 455 49 295 512 182 90 418 336 117 230 143 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1736 1750 1723 1723 1709 1709 1750 1736 1723 1736 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 157 495 53 321 557 0 98 454 365 127 250 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 1 0 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 1 0 Cap, veh/h 311 655 621 471 807 308 493 610 157 489 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.75 0.75 0.13 0.47 0.00 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.28 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 1736 1483 1641 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 157 495 53 321 557 0 98 454 365 127 250 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1736 1483 1641 1723 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 19.6 1.1 13.8 30.5 0.0 5.0 30.2 23.2 5.0 14.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 19.6 1.1 13.8 30.5 0.0 5.0 30.2 23.2 5.0 14.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 311 655 621 471 807 308 493 610 157 489 V/C Ratio(X) 0.51 0.76 0.09 0.68 0.69 0.32 0.92 0.60 0.81 0.51 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 311 655 621 485 807 308 525 637 157 521 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.5 11.6 8.1 19.7 25.1 0.0 30.6 41.8 27.3 40.1 36.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 6.7 0.2 3.7 4.8 0.0 0.6 21.0 1.4 26.5 0.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 5.1 0.4 5.5 13.1 0.0 2.1 15.9 8.4 2.8 6.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.6 18.4 8.4 23.5 29.9 0.0 31.2 62.8 28.8 66.5 37.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B A C C C E C E D Approach Vol, veh/h 705 878 917 377 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.1 27.5 45.9 46.9 Approach LOS C C D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 52.2 8.0 40.8 8.0 63.2 8.0 40.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 42.0 5.0 36.0 5.0 54.0 5.0 36.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.8 21.6 7.0 16.5 7.0 32.5 7.0 32.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 3.5 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 750 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 224 577 92 351 500 124 83 277 247 150 354 175 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.95 0.12 0.88 0.63 0.17 0.39 0.75 0.32 0.52 0.83 0.37 Control Delay 17.5 59.3 4.5 52.2 30.9 4.7 31.1 56.5 8.3 33.4 58.9 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.5 59.3 4.5 52.2 30.9 4.7 31.1 56.5 8.3 33.4 58.9 10.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 460 2 197 308 2 43 201 37 81 258 17 Queue Length 95th (ft) 134 #680 m21 #431 439 39 75 284 92 125 355 71 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1326 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 150 Base Capacity (vph) 418 612 743 399 791 738 211 447 775 289 510 538 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.94 0.12 0.88 0.63 0.17 0.39 0.62 0.32 0.52 0.69 0.33 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 751 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 01/25/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:15 pm 01/23/2023 Future (2035) No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 206 531 85 323 460 114 76 255 227 138 326 161 Future Volume (veh/h) 206 531 85 323 460 114 76 255 227 138 326 161 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1723 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 224 577 92 351 500 0 83 277 247 150 354 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 437 746 706 500 845 172 334 480 234 395 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.85 0.85 0.13 0.48 0.00 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 224 577 92 351 500 0 83 277 247 150 354 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1750 1483 1667 1750 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.0 17.1 1.1 13.6 24.8 0.0 4.8 18.4 16.2 8.4 23.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 17.1 1.1 13.6 24.8 0.0 4.8 18.4 16.2 8.4 23.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 437 746 706 500 845 172 334 480 234 395 V/C Ratio(X) 0.51 0.77 0.13 0.70 0.59 0.48 0.83 0.51 0.64 0.90 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 437 746 706 517 845 172 449 578 234 510 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.8 6.3 4.3 16.5 22.5 0.0 38.0 46.6 32.9 35.1 45.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 5.3 0.3 4.1 3.0 0.0 2.1 9.4 0.9 5.9 15.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.2 3.7 0.4 5.5 10.6 0.0 2.1 8.9 6.0 3.8 12.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.5 11.6 4.6 20.6 25.5 0.0 40.1 56.0 33.8 41.0 60.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A C C D E C D E Approach Vol, veh/h 893 851 607 504 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.9 23.5 44.8 54.8 Approach LOS B C D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.8 58.1 9.0 34.1 12.0 64.9 13.0 30.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 42.0 6.0 35.0 9.0 50.0 10.0 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.6 19.1 6.8 25.6 11.0 26.8 10.4 20.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 3.1 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 752 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 02/13/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 157 495 53 321 557 198 98 454 365 127 250 155 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.51 0.08 0.70 0.48 0.24 0.24 0.90 0.44 0.49 0.47 0.20 Control Delay 17.7 32.7 2.4 28.4 33.0 3.2 20.1 62.0 10.5 25.8 36.5 3.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.7 32.7 2.4 28.4 33.0 3.2 20.1 62.0 10.5 25.8 36.5 3.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 171 0 158 187 0 41 326 80 55 149 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 178 14 234 244 40 74 #490 144 93 234 36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 861 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 410 972 720 489 1180 846 449 554 860 270 564 774 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.51 0.07 0.66 0.47 0.23 0.22 0.82 0.42 0.47 0.44 0.20 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 753 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 02/13/2023 AM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 144 455 49 295 512 182 90 418 336 117 230 143 Future Volume (veh/h) 144 455 49 295 512 182 90 418 336 117 230 143 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1723 1736 1750 1723 1723 1709 1709 1750 1736 1723 1736 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 157 495 53 321 557 0 98 454 365 127 250 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 1 0 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 1 0 Cap, veh/h 424 1101 580 491 1303 356 500 632 209 519 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.40 0.00 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.30 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1641 3299 1483 1641 3273 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 157 495 53 321 557 0 98 454 365 127 250 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1641 1650 1483 1641 1637 1448 1628 1750 1471 1641 1736 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.5 14.1 2.7 14.8 14.8 0.0 5.0 30.0 22.6 6.4 14.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.5 14.1 2.7 14.8 14.8 0.0 5.0 30.0 22.6 6.4 14.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 424 1101 580 491 1303 356 500 632 209 519 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.45 0.09 0.65 0.43 0.28 0.91 0.58 0.61 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 458 1101 580 556 1303 426 554 677 258 550 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.1 31.3 23.1 20.8 26.2 0.0 28.3 41.3 26.0 31.1 34.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.3 0.3 2.3 1.0 0.0 0.4 17.7 1.1 2.9 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 5.8 1.0 5.8 5.9 0.0 2.0 15.4 8.1 2.7 6.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.7 32.7 23.4 23.1 27.2 0.0 28.7 59.0 27.0 33.9 35.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C E C C D Approach Vol, veh/h 705 878 917 377 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.0 25.7 43.0 34.7 Approach LOS C C D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 47.0 9.9 42.9 12.5 54.8 11.4 41.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 28.0 12.0 38.0 12.0 38.0 12.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.8 16.1 7.0 16.2 9.5 16.8 8.4 32.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 2.6 0.1 1.5 0.1 3.6 0.1 2.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.5 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 754 Queues 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 02/13/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 224 577 92 351 500 124 83 277 247 150 354 175 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.62 0.14 0.85 0.35 0.14 0.36 0.76 0.30 0.49 0.82 0.25 Control Delay 19.4 33.2 3.3 63.3 25.8 2.9 29.0 57.4 7.2 31.0 57.2 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.4 33.2 3.3 63.3 25.8 2.9 29.0 57.4 7.2 31.0 57.2 5.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 229 5 250 140 0 42 204 41 79 260 14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 90 221 8 #450 202 30 71 279 85 118 338 51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 861 652 509 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 190 320 210 350 115 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 437 928 660 416 1413 921 228 476 838 313 568 702 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.62 0.14 0.84 0.35 0.13 0.36 0.58 0.29 0.48 0.62 0.25 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 755 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 36: W Kagy Blvd & S Willson Ave 02/13/2023 PM Peak 2035 Kagy Boulevard 2:44 pm 12/16/2022 Future (2035) Improvements Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 206 531 85 323 460 114 76 255 227 138 326 161 Future Volume (veh/h) 206 531 85 323 460 114 76 255 227 138 326 161 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1723 1736 1750 1750 1750 1750 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 224 577 92 351 500 0 83 277 247 150 354 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 529 1103 566 373 1515 175 331 615 238 399 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.22 0.46 0.00 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1667 3325 1483 1667 3325 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 224 577 92 351 500 0 83 277 247 150 354 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1667 1663 1483 1667 1663 1483 1641 1736 1483 1667 1750 1483 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.6 16.8 4.9 24.8 11.6 0.0 4.9 18.4 14.0 8.4 23.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.6 16.8 4.9 24.8 11.6 0.0 4.9 18.4 14.0 8.4 23.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 529 1103 566 373 1515 175 331 615 238 399 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.52 0.16 0.94 0.33 0.47 0.84 0.40 0.63 0.89 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 529 1103 566 375 1515 175 477 740 260 569 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.4 32.4 24.5 45.8 20.9 0.0 38.1 46.7 24.7 34.9 44.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.8 0.6 31.5 0.6 0.0 2.0 8.5 0.4 4.2 11.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 7.0 1.9 13.4 4.5 0.0 2.1 8.8 5.1 3.7 11.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.9 34.2 25.1 77.3 21.5 0.0 40.1 55.2 25.1 39.2 56.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C E C D E C D E Approach Vol, veh/h 893 851 607 504 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.4 44.5 40.9 51.5 Approach LOS C D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.9 46.8 9.0 34.3 15.0 61.7 13.4 29.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 28.0 6.0 39.0 12.0 43.0 12.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 26.8 18.8 6.9 25.5 12.6 13.6 10.4 20.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.0 1.8 0.0 3.4 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.6 HCM 6th LOS D Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 756 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy AM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 90 3.0 98 3.0 1.591 290.2 LOS F 114.3 2926.2 1.00 5.14 13.98 6.4 8 T1 418 3.0 454 3.0 1.591 290.2 LOS F 114.3 2926.2 1.00 5.14 13.98 6.4 18 R2 336 3.0 365 3.0 1.591 290.2 LOS F 114.3 2926.2 1.00 5.14 13.98 6.4 Approach 844 3.0 917 3.0 1.591 290.2 LOS F 114.3 2926.2 1.00 5.14 13.98 6.4 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 295 3.0 321 3.0 1.041 62.0 LOS F 38.6 988.9 1.00 2.33 4.55 18.0 6 T1 512 3.0 557 3.0 1.041 62.0 LOS F 38.6 988.9 1.00 2.33 4.55 18.2 16 R2 182 3.0 198 3.0 0.238 6.8 LOS A 1.0 26.9 0.56 0.44 0.56 32.8 Approach 989 3.0 1075 3.0 1.041 51.8 LOS F 38.6 988.9 0.92 1.98 3.82 19.7 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 117 3.0 127 3.0 0.663 21.0 LOS C 4.1 105.7 0.83 0.95 1.33 26.4 4 T1 230 3.0 250 3.0 0.663 21.0 LOS C 4.1 105.7 0.83 0.95 1.33 26.9 14 R2 143 3.0 155 3.0 0.220 7.6 LOS A 0.9 23.3 0.62 0.53 0.62 32.4 Approach 490 3.0 533 3.0 0.663 17.1 LOS C 4.1 105.7 0.76 0.83 1.12 28.1 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 144 3.0 157 3.0 0.923 40.5 LOS E 16.4 419.4 1.00 1.59 3.00 21.7 2 T1 455 3.0 495 3.0 0.923 40.5 LOS E 16.4 419.4 1.00 1.59 3.00 22.0 12 R2 49 3.0 53 3.0 0.072 5.6 LOS A 0.3 7.1 0.55 0.46 0.55 33.4 Approach 648 3.0 704 3.0 0.923 37.8 LOS E 16.4 419.4 0.97 1.51 2.82 22.5 All Vehicles 2971 3.0 3229 3.0 1.591 110.8 LOS F 114.3 2926.2 0.93 2.59 6.04 13.1 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, January 27, 2023 9:43:02 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 757 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy PM - single (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 76 3.0 83 3.0 1.021 66.8 LOS F 22.7 582.2 1.00 2.00 4.11 17.3 8 T1 255 3.0 277 3.0 1.021 66.8 LOS F 22.7 582.2 1.00 2.00 4.11 17.5 18 R2 227 3.0 247 3.0 1.021 66.8 LOS F 22.7 582.2 1.00 2.00 4.11 17.5 Approach 558 3.0 607 3.0 1.021 66.8 LOS F 22.7 582.2 1.00 2.00 4.11 17.5 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 323 3.0 351 3.0 1.018 55.9 LOS F 34.3 878.1 1.00 2.18 4.19 18.8 6 T1 460 3.0 500 3.0 1.018 55.9 LOS F 34.3 878.1 1.00 2.18 4.19 19.1 16 R2 114 3.0 124 3.0 0.147 5.8 LOS A 0.6 15.7 0.53 0.41 0.53 33.3 Approach 897 3.0 975 3.0 1.018 49.5 LOS E 34.3 878.1 0.94 1.96 3.72 20.0 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 138 3.0 150 3.0 0.902 43.8 LOS E 9.9 253.9 0.96 1.39 2.45 21.0 4 T1 326 3.0 354 3.0 0.902 43.8 LOS E 9.9 253.9 0.96 1.39 2.45 21.3 14 R2 161 3.0 175 3.0 0.242 7.8 LOS A 1.0 26.2 0.62 0.52 0.62 32.3 Approach 625 3.0 679 3.0 0.902 34.5 LOS D 9.9 253.9 0.87 1.17 1.98 23.2 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 206 3.0 224 3.0 1.341 182.7 LOS F 72.6 1858.6 1.00 4.16 11.12 9.3 2 T1 531 3.0 577 3.0 1.341 182.7 LOS F 72.6 1858.6 1.00 4.16 11.12 9.3 12 R2 85 3.0 92 3.0 0.147 7.5 LOS A 0.6 14.4 0.62 0.56 0.62 32.5 Approach 822 3.0 893 3.0 1.341 164.5 LOS F 72.6 1858.6 0.96 3.79 10.04 10.0 All Vehicles 2902 3.0 3154 3.0 1.341 82.2 LOS F 72.6 1858.6 0.94 2.31 5.21 15.6 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, January 27, 2023 9:43:38 AM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 758 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy AM - N/S RT lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 90 3.0 98 3.0 0.161 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.3 0.60 0.57 0.60 29.8 8 T1 418 3.0 454 3.0 0.678 19.1 LOS C 5.1 131.1 0.81 0.97 1.48 28.1 18 R2 336 3.0 365 3.0 0.470 11.0 LOS B 2.6 67.8 0.67 0.67 0.93 30.7 Approach 844 3.0 917 3.0 0.678 14.6 LOS B 5.1 131.1 0.73 0.80 1.17 29.2 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 295 3.0 321 3.0 0.641 17.8 LOS C 4.7 120.4 0.80 0.92 1.37 26.8 6 T1 512 3.0 557 3.0 0.641 16.8 LOS C 4.8 122.6 0.79 0.90 1.36 28.6 16 R2 182 3.0 198 3.0 0.286 8.7 LOS A 1.2 31.2 0.65 0.56 0.65 31.8 Approach 989 3.0 1075 3.0 0.641 15.6 LOS C 4.8 122.6 0.77 0.84 1.23 28.5 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 117 3.0 127 3.0 0.255 10.9 LOS B 0.9 22.6 0.67 0.67 0.68 28.6 4 T1 230 3.0 250 3.0 0.449 13.8 LOS B 2.0 51.1 0.72 0.79 0.99 30.0 14 R2 143 3.0 155 3.0 0.206 7.0 LOS A 0.7 19.1 0.56 0.49 0.56 32.5 Approach 490 3.0 533 3.0 0.449 11.1 LOS B 2.0 51.1 0.66 0.68 0.79 30.3 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 144 3.0 157 3.0 0.471 12.5 LOS B 2.6 65.5 0.71 0.73 1.00 29.0 2 T1 455 3.0 495 3.0 0.471 11.9 LOS B 2.6 65.5 0.69 0.72 0.98 30.4 12 R2 49 3.0 53 3.0 0.074 5.7 LOS A 0.3 7.2 0.56 0.47 0.56 33.1 Approach 648 3.0 704 3.0 0.471 11.6 LOS B 2.6 65.5 0.69 0.70 0.95 30.3 All Vehicles 2971 3.0 3229 3.0 0.678 13.7 LOS B 5.1 131.1 0.72 0.77 1.08 29.4 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, January 23, 2023 4:31:15 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 759 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Willson & Kagy PM - N/S RT lanes (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ] veh/h % veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: S 3rd Ave 3 L2 76 3.0 83 3.0 0.162 9.2 LOS A 0.5 13.7 0.64 0.64 0.64 29.3 8 T1 255 3.0 277 3.0 0.487 14.5 LOS B 2.3 59.1 0.73 0.81 1.05 29.7 18 R2 227 3.0 247 3.0 0.351 9.6 LOS A 1.5 37.9 0.64 0.61 0.74 31.4 Approach 558 3.0 607 3.0 0.487 11.8 LOS B 2.3 59.1 0.68 0.71 0.87 30.3 East: Kagy Blvd 1 L2 323 3.0 351 3.0 0.552 13.3 LOS B 3.8 97.2 0.73 0.76 1.11 28.1 6 T1 460 3.0 500 3.0 0.552 12.6 LOS B 3.8 97.9 0.71 0.74 1.09 30.3 16 R2 114 3.0 124 3.0 0.159 6.3 LOS A 0.6 16.6 0.56 0.45 0.56 32.9 Approach 897 3.0 975 3.0 0.552 12.0 LOS B 3.8 97.9 0.70 0.71 1.03 29.7 North: S Willson Ave 7 L2 138 3.0 150 3.0 0.288 11.1 LOS B 1.1 27.0 0.67 0.68 0.73 28.6 4 T1 326 3.0 354 3.0 0.612 18.4 LOS C 3.6 91.1 0.78 0.92 1.30 28.3 14 R2 161 3.0 175 3.0 0.217 6.8 LOS A 0.8 20.6 0.55 0.46 0.55 32.6 Approach 625 3.0 679 3.0 0.612 13.8 LOS B 3.6 91.1 0.70 0.75 0.98 29.3 West: Kagy Blvd 5 L2 206 3.0 224 3.0 0.675 21.7 LOS C 4.7 119.2 0.82 1.00 1.50 25.9 2 T1 531 3.0 577 3.0 0.675 20.5 LOS C 4.8 121.8 0.82 0.99 1.50 27.3 12 R2 85 3.0 92 3.0 0.148 7.5 LOS A 0.6 14.5 0.62 0.56 0.62 32.3 Approach 822 3.0 893 3.0 0.675 19.5 LOS C 4.8 121.8 0.80 0.95 1.41 27.3 All Vehicles 2902 3.0 3154 3.0 0.675 14.5 LOS B 4.8 121.8 0.72 0.79 1.10 29.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: SANDERSON STEWART | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, January 23, 2023 4:32:11 PM Project: P:\15060_01_Kagy_Blvd_S_19th_to_Willson_PM\DESIGN\TRAFFIC\Capacity Calcs\Future Results\2035\2035-Kagy Roundabouts.sip9 760 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Taylor Chambers, Deputy City Clerk Mike Maas, City Clerk Jeff Mihelich, City Manager SUBJECT:Appointment of the Gallatin County Designee to the Community Development Advisory Board MEETING DATE:February 28, 2023 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:I move to appoint the Gallatin County designee to the Community Development Board for a term ending January 31, 2025. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.2 Community Engagement: Broaden and deepen engagement of the community in city government, innovating methods for inviting input from the community and stakeholders. BACKGROUND:Per MCA 76-1-223,"When a city council has enacted an ordinance creating a city planning board or when a vacancy occurs in the county's membership on the city planning board, the board of county commissioners of the county in which the city is located shall within 45 days designate a representative of the county to the mayor of the city for appointment to the city planning board. This representative may be a member of the board of county commissioners or an officeholder or employee of the county. The mayor may not reject or refuse to appoint to the city planning board a representative designated by a board of county commissioners as provided in this section, but if the county fails to designate a representative, then the mayor may appoint as a representative of the county a person of the mayor's own choosing and at the mayor's sole discretion." Per Resolution 5330, "The Community Development Board will assume all duties required by law for a city planning board and city zoning commission" with "One member to be appointed by the Mayor upon the designation by Gallatin County Commission." As a Mayoral appointment, the County's designee is a City officer, subject to all requirements and policies of the City, including but not limited to the High Performing Boards Resolution 5323 and the City's Code of Ethics. On January 31, 2023 the current County Designee's term expired; on February 14, 2023, the Gallatin County Commission designated Ben Lloyd for 761 appointment to this position. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As determined by the Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: Ben Lloyd designation letter.pdf Report compiled on: February 2, 2023 762 763