Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAa Wetlands Memo Home 2 Hotel Site Wetland Delineation - August 2019 Bozeman, Montana Prepared for: Cape-France Enterprises 1184 North 15th Street, Suite 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 Prepared by: 2880 Technology Boulevard West Bozeman, MT 59718 August 2019 Project No. 2605.028.00 Home 2 Hotel Site Wetland Delineation i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Soil .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.3 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 2 3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 2 3.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Soil .............................................................................................................................. 2 3.3 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 2 3.3.1 Topography .......................................................................................................... 2 3.3.2 National Wetland Inventory ................................................................................... 3 3.3.3 Floodplains ........................................................................................................... 3 4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 3 5 References ......................................................................................................................... 4 Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B USACE Wetland Determination Forms Appendix C Site Photographs Home 2 Hotel Site Wetland Delineation ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A wetland delineation was performed by Morrison-Maierle, Inc. (Morrison-Maierle) for Cape- France Enterprises (Client) on the Home 2 Hotel Site. The project area consists of 5.53 acres of undeveloped property located to the south of the intersection of East Baxter Lane and Boot Hill Court in Gallatin County, Montana (Appendix A, Figure 1). The subject property was evaluated for its content of potential jurisdictional wetlands and waterbodies, based on criteria set forth in the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) (Environmental Laboratory 2010). Prior to the site visit, Morrison-Maierle reviewed existing project area literature including historical aerial photography, topographic maps, and hydrology data. A subsequent field evaluation was performed to identify hydric soils, hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. Vegetation communities were evaluated and documented to delineate wetland and upland boundaries. Based on the wetland delineation presented in this report and the data collected, it is Morrison- Maierle’s professional judgement that waters of the U.S. were present within the project area. The Home 2 Hotel Site contains 0.11 acres of emergent wetland. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are the final authority over the jurisdictional status of both wetlands and waters of the U.S. per Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The findings discussed in this report are solely the opinion of Morrison-Maierle and have not been verified by the aforementioned regulatory government agencies. Home 2 Hotel Site Wetland Delineation Page 1 1 Introduction At the request of the Client, Morrison-Maierle completed a wetland delineation on the Home 2 Hotel Site. The project area consists of 5.53 acres of undeveloped property located to the south of the intersection of East Baxter Lane and Boot Hill Court in Gallatin County, Montana (Appendix A, Figure 1). This technical report summarizes the findings of the wetland delineation. 2 Methods This wetland delineation utilized the methodology presented in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and subsequent modifications outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) (Environmental Laboratory 2010). The methodology includes sampling procedures for vegetation, hydrology, and soil parameters. Upland data points (UDP) and wetland data points (WDP) were established as needed during the field visit. Sample data points were labeled with an UDP or WDP, followed by the number associated with the data point, (e.g. noted here in bold (UDP-1-19) to correspond to the sample points for that location. The number 19 indicates that this sample point was observed in 2019. Data for vegetation, hydrology, and soils were recorded in the field and entered on Wetland Determination Data Forms. Corresponding photographs were taken at each data point. Sample points and wetland boundaries (if present) were recorded using a Trimble® GeoXH™ Global Positioning System (GPS) unit and post-processed to sub-meter accuracy. Locations were then converted to shapefiles uploaded into ArcMap 10.6.1 for display on figures included in Appendix A. 2.1 Vegetation Vegetation at upland and wetland data points was classified based on its wetland indicator status derived from the Montana 2016 State Wetland Plant List (Lichvar et al. 2016). Using the current plant list, vegetation cover qualifies as hydrophytic when over 50% of the dominant plant species have an indicator status of obligate (OBL), facultative wet (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC). FAC plants, such as Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), are equally likely to occur in wetlands and non- wetlands. Vegetation cover was considered as upland where over 50% of the dominant plant species were classified as upland (UPL), and/or facultative upland (FACU). Plants observed within each data plot were identified using Montana Manual of Vascular Plants (Lesica 2012) along with other reference books. Vegetation nomenclature follows Lichvar et al. (2016) and Lesica (2012). 2.2 Soil Wetlands must meet the qualifications of at least one hydric soil indicator, or meet the definition of a hydric soil (a soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (NRCS 2019a)). Soils at each data point were evaluated and described notating the depth, matrix color, mottle abundance and contrast (if present), texture, etc. (Environmental Laboratory, 1987 and 2010). Home 2 Hotel Site Wetland Delineation Page 2 Moist matrix color and moist mottle color of the soils were determined utilizing the Munsell Soil Color Chart (Kollmorgan Instruments Corporation, 2009). 2.3 Hydrology Primary and secondary hydrologic indicators were assessed at each wetland and upland data point; one primary indicator or two secondary indicators are required to qualify the area as containing wetland hydrology. Examples of primary hydrology indicators are saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface, surface water, and water table within 12 inches of the ground surface. Examples of secondary hydrology indicators are FAC-neutral test and geomorphic position on the landscape. 3 Results A wetland delineation of the project area was performed by Morrison-Maierle environmental scientists on July 30, 2019. The vegetation, hydrology, and soil characteristics at each of five data points were documented in the field and recorded on Wetland Determination Data Forms for the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Supplement, 2010). 3.1 Vegetation Vegetation communities were evaluated and documented to delineate wetland and upland boundaries. The upland herbaceous areas within the project were dominated by intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium, NI), Canada thistle (Circium arvense, FAC), stickywilly (Galium aparine, FACU), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola, FACU), and hoary alyssum (Berteroa incana, NI). The palustrine emergent wetland within the project area was dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), Canada thistle, fringed willow herb (Epilobium ciliatum, FACW), and common spikerush (Eleocharis palustris, OBL). The location of all data points are identified on Figure 5 of Appendix A. 3.2 Soil Mapped soil types within the project area were obtained from the Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2019b). Two mapped soil types were identified in the project area: Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes (509B) and Saypo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (506A) (Appendix A, Figure 3). Soils were analyzed in the field for texture and color using the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell 2009). Soils within upland areas exhibited a 10YR 2/1 (black) loam or loamy clay matrix. Soil within the wetland areas exhibited a 10YR 3/1 (very dark grey) clay with 30 to 40 percent 10YR 6/2 (light brownish gray) and two percent redoximorphic features of 7.5YR 3/4 (dark brown) down to 12 inches. Below 12 inches consisted of a restrictive layer of gravel and rocks. The soil within the wetland area meets the characteristics of redox dark surface hydric soils (F6). 3.3 Hydrology 3.3.1 Topography The project area lies within the Bozeman, Montana (2017), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute Topographic Map. The project area is shown to be fairly flat with an elevation of approximately 4,725 feet above sea level (Appendix A, Figure 2). Older topographic maps show Home 2 Hotel Site Wetland Delineation Page 3 a railroad that traverses the northeast corner of the property. During the site evaluation, the slope of the project area was indicative of a drainage feature through the north portion of the property near where the railroad was shown on older topographic maps. The EPA National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) was referenced to identify waterbodies within and near the project area (EPA 2019). The nearest surface water features to the project area are unnamed tributaries located approximately 800 feet to the east and one approximately 900 feet to the west. 3.3.2 National Wetland Inventory The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service maintains the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), which serves as a publicly available resource that provides detailed information on the abundance, characteristics, and distribution of U.S. wetlands. According to the NWI database no features are located within the project area (USFWS 2019). However, one emergent wetland feature is located on the adjacent property to the east. Appendix A, Figure 4 depicts the NWI features in the project vicinity. The site evaluation included an investigation of the area to the west of the NWI features shown in the database. This area exhibited characteristics of a palustrine emergent wetland and is connected to the NWI feature to the east via a culvert under the road. 3.3.3 Floodplains The project area is located on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 30031C0808D, effective September 2, 2011 with a Letter of Map Revision on October 30, 2015. The project area lies entirely outside of the 100-year floodplain (FEMA 2019). 4 Conclusions Based on the results of the wetland delineation performed according to USACE guidelines, it is Morrison-Maierle’s professional judgement that portions of the project area meets the technical criteria to be classified as waters of the U.S. The project area contains two emergent wetlands, totaling 0.11 acres (Appendix A, Figure 5). Home 2 Hotel Site Wetland Delineation Page 4 5 References Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. Environmental Laboratory. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. (Version 2.0) U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory. Vicksburg, MS. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). National Hydrography Dataset Plus. 2019. https://www.epa.gov/waterdata/nhdplus-national-hydrography-dataset-plus Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). 2019. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home Kollmorgan Instruments Corporation. 2009. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division, New Windsor, NY. Lesica, P. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. Brit Press. Fort Worth, Texas. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2019a. Hydric Soils Definition. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/use/hydric/?cid=nrcs142p2_053961 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2019b. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2019. National Wetland Inventory Wetlands Mapper. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html U.S. Geological Survey. 2017. Bozeman, Montana, 7.5-minute Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. APPENDIX A: FIGURES Home 2 Hotel Wetland Delineation VICINITY MAPDRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 8/6/2019 GALLATIN COUNTY MT COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\2605\028 - Home 2\GIS\Fig 1_Topo Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. 2605.028 1 2880 Technology Blvd. WBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702 Legend Subject Property  Subject Property Gallatin County, MontanaSection 01, Township 02 South, Range 05 EastMinor Sub 407C, Lot 2A 0 1,200 2,400600Feet ± 0 21Miles Home 2 Hotel Wetland Delineation AERIAL MAPDRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 8/6/2019 GALLATIN COUNTY MT COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\2605\028 - Home 2\GIS\Fig 2_Aerial Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. 2605.028 2 2880 Technology Blvd. WBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702  0 200 400100Feet ± Legend Subject Property Home 2 Hotel Wetland Delineation NRCS SOILS MAPDRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 8/6/2019 GALLATIN COUNTY MT COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\2605\028 - Home 2\GIS\Fig 3_Soils Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. 2605.028 3 2880 Technology Blvd. WBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702  509B 50B 506A 0 200 400100Feet ±Legend NRCS Soil Unit Subject Property Home 2 Hotel Wetland Delineation NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAPDRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 8/6/2019 GALLATIN COUNTY MT COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\2605\028 - Home 2\GIS\Fig 4_NWI Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. 2605.028 4 2880 Technology Blvd. WBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702  0 200 400100Feet ±Legend Subject Property Freshwater Emergent Wetland Home 2 Hotel Wetland Delineation WETLAND DELINEATION MAPDRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 8/6/2019 GALLATIN COUNTY MT COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\2605\028 - Home 2\GIS\Fig 5_WD Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. 2605.028 5 2880 Technology Blvd. WBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702  !( !( !( !( !( WET 1(0.03 acres) WET 2(0.08 acres)UDP-2-19 WDP-2-19 UDP-1-19 WDP-1-19UDP-3-19 0 100 20050Feet ±Legend Subject Property Wetland (0.11 acres) !(Upland Data Point !(Wetland Data Point APPENDIX B: USACE WETLAND DETERMINATION FORMS Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:7/30/2019 Applicant/Owner: Cape-France Enterprises State:Montana Sampling Point:UDP-1-19 Investigator(s):B. Carr, C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): upland plain flat Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mtn Valleys Lat: 45.699663°Long:-111.059217° Soil Map Unit Name:Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No X Yes No X Yes Yes No X No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Yes (includes cappillary fringe)No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology, this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Home 2 Hotel Site Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: S01, T02 S, R05 E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland? Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP-1-19 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 0 (A) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 0%(A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =0 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 5 x 3 =15 5 FACU species 10 x 4 =40 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:15 (A) (B)55 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =4 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 80 YES NI in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 5 NO FACU height 3 5 NO FAC 4 5 NO FACU Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 5 NO NI than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Galium aparine Cirsium arvense Lactuca serriola Berteroa incana Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Sapling Stratum (30') Thinopyrum intermedium Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana UDP-1-19 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-18 100 loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Color (moist) Redox Fetures 10YR 2/1 Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:7/30/2019 Applicant/Owner: Cape-France Enterprises State:Montana Sampling Point:UDP-2-19 Investigator(s):B. Carr, C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): upland plain flat Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mtn Valleys Lat: 45.699970°Long:-111.059589° Soil Map Unit Name:Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X NoSUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes X NoYes No X Yes Yes No X No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Water Table Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present?Saturation Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Yes (includes cappillary fringe)No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Home 2 Hotel Site Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: S01, T02 S, R05 E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Based on the absence of hydric soils and wetland hydrology, this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP-2-19 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 2 (A)2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:34 Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 67%(A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 30 x 1 =303FACW species 50 x 2 =1004FAC species 0 x 3 =05FACU species 20 x 4 =80 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:100 (A) (B)210 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 20 YES FACU Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 20 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 50 YES FACW in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 30 YES OBL height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 80 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Phalaris arundinacea Rosa woodsii Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Eleocharis palustris SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana UDP-2-19 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-18 100 loamy clay 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes No X 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) 10YR 2/1 Color (moist) Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:7/30/2019 Applicant/Owner: Cape-France Enterprises State:Montana Sampling Point:UDP-3-19 Investigator(s):B. Carr, C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): upland plain flat Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mtn Valleys Lat: 45.699503°Long:-111.061718° Soil Map Unit Name:Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X NoSUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No XYes No X Yes Yes No X No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Water Table Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present?Saturation Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Yes (includes cappillary fringe)No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Home 2 Hotel Site Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: S01, T02 S, R05 E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology, this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP-3-19 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 1 (A)2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:34 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 50%(A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =03FACW species 0 x 2 =04FAC species 45 x 3 =1355FACU species 10 x 4 =40 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:55 (A) (B)175 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =3 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 45 YES FAC in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 20 YES NI height 3 10 NO NI 4 5 NO FACU Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 5 NO FACU than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 85 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Cirsium arvense Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Thinopyrum intermedium Berteroa incana Lactuca serriola Galium aparine SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana UDP-3-19 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-18 100 loamy clay 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes No X 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) 10YR 2/1 Color (moist) Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:7/30/2019 Applicant/Owner: Cape-France Enterprises State:Montana Sampling Point:WDP-1-19 Investigator(s):B. Carr, C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage depression concave Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mtn Valleys Lat: 45.699783°Long:-111.059050° Soil Map Unit Name:Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X NoSUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes X NoYes X No Yes X Yes X No No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, X High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) X Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)X Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)X Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Water Table Present?Yes X No Depth (inches 8 Wetland Hydrology Present?Saturation Present?Yes X No Depth (inches 0 Yes X (includes cappillary fringe)No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Home 2 Hotel Site Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: S01, T02 S, R05 E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology, this location meets the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP-1-19 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 1 (A)2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:34 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100%(A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 5 x 1 =53FACW species 90 x 2 =1804FAC species 5 x 3 =155FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:100 (A) (B)200 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is >50% 3 X Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 80 YES FACW in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 10 NO FACW height 3 5 NO FAC 4 5 NO OBL Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Phalaris arundinacea Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Epilobium ciliatum Cirsium arvense Eleocharis palustris SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana WDP-1-19 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-12 68 2 C M clay 30 12-18 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)X Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes X No 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were observed at this location. 10YR 6/2 gravel Remarks Color (moist) 10YR 3/1 7.5YR 3/4 Color (moist) Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:7/30/2019 Applicant/Owner: Cape-France Enterprises State:Montana Sampling Point:WDP-2-19 Investigator(s):B. Carr, C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage depression concave Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mtn Valleys Lat: 45.699913°Long:-111.059673° Soil Map Unit Name:Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X NoSUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes X NoYes X No Yes X Yes X No No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) X Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)X Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)X Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Water Table Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present?Saturation Present?Yes X No Depth (inches 4 Yes X (includes cappillary fringe)No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Home 2 Hotel Site Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: S01, T02 S, R05 E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology, this location meets the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP-2-19 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 1 (A)2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:34 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100%(A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 10 x 1 =103FACW species 90 x 2 =1804FAC species 0 x 3 =05FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:100 (A) (B)190 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is >50% 3 X Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 90 YES FACW in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 5 NO OBL height 3 5 NO OBL 4 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Phalaris arundinacea Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Carex nebrascensis Eleocharis palustris SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana WDP-2-19 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-6 100 clay 6-12 58 2 C M clay 40 clay12-18 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)X Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes X No 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were observed at this location. 10YR 3/1 10YR 6/2 Remarks Color (moist) 10YR 3/1 7.5YR 3/4 Color (moist) gravel Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix APPENDIX C: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS N:\2605\028 -Home 2\04 Design\Reports\Wetland delineation\Field Photos Home 2 Hotel SiteWetland DelineationGallatin County, Montana Photo Date: June 30, 2019 Photo 1: View of the upland herbaceous community on the property, facing east. Photo 2: View of the flagged emergent wetland boundary in the northeast corneroftheproperty, facing west.