The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About29_Response to CommentsREF #REVIEWED BY TYPE VIEW ENTER YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HERE DISCUSSION CYCLE STATUS 11 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 3/23/22 11:52 AM Markup 9_Engineering Report.pdf ENG- Water Demand Calculations The applicant must finish the water design calculations and clearly demonstrate adequate water can be provided to the development. BMC 38.220.060 open See attached for the fire flow WaterCAD model Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 2:28 PM The applicant has not demonstrated that the required flows can be provided at the interior hydrants. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM THE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN UPDATED AND ARE INCLUDED WITHIN THE ENGINEERING REPORT. SEE THE INCLUDED FIRE FLOW CURVE AS WAS PROVIDED BY CITY ENGINEERING. 1 Unresolved 14 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 3/23/22 11:52 AM Markup 9_Engineering Report.pdf ENG- Sewer Calculations The applicant must analyze the sewer mains through the site and downstream to the Norton Ranch Lift Station and demonstrate adequate capacity is available in the proposed and existing sewer mains. Per DSSP V.B.2, the analysis must include demand from all the area outside of the study area that would be naturally served through the study area (i.e. potential upstream development). open See attached for the updated sewer calculations.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 3:59 PM The sewer demand calculations must be revised per the calculation comments prior to the Engineering Division reviewing if the applicant has adequately demonstrated sufficient capacity is provided. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM THE APPLICABLE SEWER MAINS THROUGHOUT THE SITE AND DOWNSTREAM HAVE BEEN VERIFIED THAT ADEQUATE CAPACITY EXISTS. PLEASE SEE THE UPDATED ENGINEERING REPORT FOR THAT NARRATIVE AND THE NEWLY INCLUDED FIGURE IN THE APPENDIX E. 1 Unresolved 16 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 3/23/22 4:47 PM Markup 12_Engineering Report Appendix C.pdf ENG- Reliance Pipe 2 Please verify that this pipe is 15-inch. The infrastructure viewer shows this as a 12-inch pipe. open See attached sheet C5.3 from Norton East Ranch Phase 3C as-builts.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/8/22 2:42 PM Please provide a copy of the as-built. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM THE PIPE HAS BEEN VERIFIED TO BE A 15 INCH THROUGH AS-BUILT RESEARCH. 1 Unresolved 19 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/1/22 4:37 PM Markup 6_CoB Waiver Request Preliminary Plat.pdf ENG- Waivers from BMC 38.220.060 Information The applicant must provide the required information for any sections not waived during the pre- application review. open See attached for the agreement from NWE showing the joint trench committee and it's partners.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 4:10 PM The applicant must provide the required information for BMC 220.060.A.12. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM NOTED, SEE BELOW. 1 Unresolved 22 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/1/22 4:37 PM Markup 27_ConcurrentConstruction Form.pdf ENG- Concurrent Construction Per BMC 38.270.030, the development is not eligible for concurrent construction. open Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM NOTED 1 Info Only 23 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/1/22 4:37 PM Markup 6_CoB Waiver Request Preliminary Plat.pdf ENG- 38.220.060.A.12 Non-Municipal Facilities This information was not waived during pre-application review. The applicant must provide the required information. open See attached for the agreement from NWE showing the joint trench committee and it's partners.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 4:08 PM Per BMC 220.060.A.12, the applicant must send a copy of the plat to all relevant utility companies and provide written statements from each that the subdivision can be provided with service. The applicant has reached out to NWE but must also reach out to and receive responses from the other non-municipal utility companies. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM NOTED, WE HAVE COORDINATED WITH NWE ON THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AND THEY COORDINATE THROUGH THEIR JOINT TRENCH COMMITTEE TO OTHER PARTIES. 1 Unresolved 33 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/5/22 12:52 PM Library Comment DSSP Plans and Specifications Review Policy A. -Plans, specifications, and submittals for the following public infrastructure improvements must be submitted to the City Engineering Department (engsubmittals@bozeman.net) for infrastructure review: streets, water, wastewater, storm, and lighting. 1 Info Only 34 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/5/22 1:05 PM Library Comment Only the general layout of the public infrastructure improvements was reviewed as part of the Preliminary Plat review. Detailed review of the improvements design will be performed within the Engineering Department's infrastructure review process. 1 Info Only 40 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/5/22 2:33 PM Markup 21_ PreApplication Comment Response.pdf ENG- Municipal Infrastructure Mains to the Western Boundary Per BMC 38.410.070.A.3, Municipal infrastructure mains must be constructed to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions. An exception to this standard may be granted upon written request of the applicant if the applicant demonstrates during the development review process that more efficient design can be accomplished without jeopardizing the public's health, safety and welfare, the intent of this chapter, or the intent of the city's growth policy. open The water main has been extended to the western property boundary, see sheet C3.1 of the updated construction drawings.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 3:48 PM The water line must extended to the western boundary. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM NOTED, THROUGH FURTHER DISCUSSIONS WITH LYNN, THE WATER WILL BE EXTENDED PAST THE TRAIL/SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL DORADO FOR FUTURE USE, HOWEVER, THERE IS NO LONGER A NEED FOR SEWER ALONG THAT STRETCH OF EL DORADO, SO NO SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED WEST. AS WELL, THE ROW WILL BE PROVIDED BUT NOT CONSTRUCTED AS THE PARK ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE MORE IMPORTANT. 1 Unresolved 41 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/5/22 2:33 PM Markup 21_ PreApplication Comment Response.pdf ENG- Departures, Deviations, and Modifications Per BMC 38.220.040.B.2, the applicant must provide a written statement describing any intended departure, deviation, modification, non-compliance or alternative compliance to any standard applicable to a subdivision review; providing a BMC citation to the authority authorizing the non- compliance; and providing the applicable criteria of review. open The water main has been extended to the western property boundary, see sheet C3.1 of the updated construction drawings.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 3:49 PM The water line must extended to the western boundary or a deviation must be requested. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM NOTED, HOWEVER IT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED THAT A DEVIATION IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT, PER DISCUSSIONS WITH LYNN. 1 Unresolved 42 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/5/22 2:33 PM Markup 21_ PreApplication Comment Response.pdf ENG- BMC 38.400.010.A.1 Variance A variance from the requirements of BMC 38.400.010.A.1 is considered a subdivision variance and as such must be requested and reviewed per the requirements in BMC 38.250.080. open Fallon will be constructed to the boundary line, see sheet C5.0 of the updated construction drawings.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 3:51 PM The variance must be requested if Fallon Street is not constructed to the western boundary. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM NOTED, HOWEVER IT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED THAT A VARIANCE IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT, PER DISCUSSIONS WITH LYNN. 1 Unresolved 55 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/7/22 3:07 PM Markup 20_UF Phase 1_Traffic Memo.pdf ENG- Traffic Information The information provided by the applicant is not adequate. The applicant must provide all the information required in BMC 38.220.060.A.11.f through j. open See attached for the preliminary traffic study that was completed for the entire 100ac subdivision build out.Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/12/22 12:12 PM The applicant has not provided the required information. The applicant must review the referenced code section and provide all of the required information for the proposed subdivision. Provision of this information has not been waived; therefore, it must be provided. The proposed subdivision is a stand alone subdivision; therefore, the report must be for this subdivision alone. When addressing subsection j, please note that if the choice between 38.270.030.B.1.b.1 and 38.270.030.B.1.b.2 is not designated at this stage, then the requirements of 38.270.030.B.1.b.1 will be required prior to final plat. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM THE TRAFFIC MEMO HAS BEEN FURTHER UPDATED TO REFLECT THE CURRENT CONDITIONS, PROJECTED PEAK HOUR TRIPS (WHICH FALLS UNDER THE TYPICAL TIS REQUIRED THRESHOLD) AND ALSO NOTES THAT THIS PHASE 1 IS PART OF A MUCH BIGGER TIS THAT ENCOMPASSES PHASE 2 OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND THAT DRAFT TIS IS INCLUDED FOR YOUR REVIEW. 1 Unresolved 61 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 4/13/22 3:07 PM Markup 9_Engineering Report.pdf ENG- Sewer Capacity in Norton Ranch Lift Station The applicant must demonstrate that the sewer demands of the site fit within the sewer demand allocated for this site in the most recent version of the Norton Ranch Lift Station Analysis. open See attached for the updated sewer calculations Reviewer Response: CODY FLAMMOND - 7/14/22 4:00 PM The sewer demand calculations must be revised per the calculation comments prior to the Engineering Division reviewing if the applicant has adequately demonstrated sufficient capacity is provided. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Nicole Olmstead - 5/18/22 6:13 PM NOTED, WE ARE CURRENTLY WORKING WITH HDR/NORTON/STRATTON TO UPDATE THE APPLICABLE REPORT, FLOW NUMBERS AND NECESSARY UPGRADES FOR THE LIFT STATION TO HANDLE THE INCREASED AMOUNT OF FLOW FROM ALL THE APPROPRIATE PROJECTS. 1 Unresolved 79 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 7/8/22 5:02 PM Markup 9.5_ Overall Sewer Main Analysis-NRLS.pdf ENG-Sewer Calculation Area The applicant must use the entire area in the sewer calculations and not discount right-of-way area from the calculations. The applicant must update the calculations. open See attached for the updated sewer calculations 3 Unresolved 80 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 7/12/22 2:42 PM Markup 3_PRELIMINARY PLAT.pdf ENG- Right-of-Way Width Local streets must have 60 feet of right-of-way. The applicant must provide the full right-of-way width for El Dorado Avenue. open See the included prelimiary plat for the updated 60' right-of-way for Eldorado Avenue.3 Unresolved 81 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 7/14/22 4:17 PM Markup 27_C5.5-STRIPING AND SIGNAGE PLAN.pdf ENG- Alley Path Crossings The applicant must provide striping for the pedestrian crossings in the alleys. The applicant should consider providing pedestrian lighting at these locations, as well. open 3 Info Only 82 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 7/14/22 4:33 PM Markup 6_C1.0-OVERALL SITE PLAN.pdf ENG- Radius on Alley Approach The applicant should consider a whether a radius approach at this alley approach is warranted to accommodate solid waste truck traffic turning right onto Eldorado Avenue. open 3 Info Only 83 Engineering CODY FLAMMOND 7/14/22 4:48 PM Markup 31_L101 LANDSCAPE AND PARK PLAN.pdf ENG- Trees in Street Vision Triangles The applicant is encouraged to consider the street vision triangles during the placement of trees adjacent to intersections and alley accesses. open 3 Info Only 65 Fire Department Scott Mueller 4/1/22 12:32 PM Comment As proposed Fire has no concerns at this time. 1 Info Only1 64 Forestry Division Alex Nordquest 4/13/22 9:09 AM Comment No Forestry Division concerns at this time. 1 Info Only1 66 Northwestern Energy Thomas Stewart 3/10/22 2:29 PM Comment See changemark comments. 1 Info Only1 67 Northwestern Energy Matt Tilstra 3/11/22 12:07 PM Comment See changemark comments. 1 Info Only1 4 Northwestern Energy Matt Tilstra 3/11/22 12:06 PM Markup 3_PRELIMINARY PLAT.pdf NWE - BL1 LT 5 Easement NWE requires 10-foot PUE on all property lines adjacent to road R.O.W. open 1 Info Only 70 Parks Department Matthew Lee 6/27/22 12:13 PM Comment Update parkland tracking table on document 31_L101 to show net lot area, net density, required parkland, provided parkland, and the remaining parkland to be provided as CILP. Parkland Tracking Table has been updated to reflect current parkland dedication 3 Unresolved 71 Parks Department Matthew Lee 6/27/22 12:16 PM Comment BMC 38.220.060.A.14.d. - Clarify if remaining parkland will be provided as CILP or IILP. Provide a justification responding to review factors in Resolution 4784 for providing the remaining parkland as CILP/IILP. See new document with response to Resolution 4784 criteria 3 Unresolved 72 Parks Department Matthew Lee 6/27/22 1:05 PM Comment BMC 38.220.060.A.14.b and 38.220.060.A.14.a.(6) - Provide irrigation information including but not limited to main lines, lateral lines, heads, valves, GPM/PSI requirements, and well information. Minimize the amount of irrigation lines that cross perpendicularly to the PUE. This is to minimize amount of irrigation line that would need to be cut if works occurs in the PUE. Irrigation information is found on sheet IR-1 3 Unresolved 74 Parks Department Matthew Lee 6/27/22 1:29 PM Comment 38.220.060.A.14.a.(13) and (14) - Include these two descriptions. See Park Comment Response Letter.3 Unresolved 75 Parks Department Matthew Lee 6/27/22 1:36 PM Comment Demonstrate that well used as water source will have enough capacity to irrigate all parks using it as a source while also fitting within the city's current water conservation irrigation schedule. See irrigation information on sheet IR-1 3 Unresolved