Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-28-22 Public Comment - A. Zale - Public Comment on Site Plan 22047_ Sundance Springs Neighborhood Services Lot # 2 DevelopmentFrom:Zale, Alexander To:Lynn Hyde Cc:Agenda Subject:Public Comment on Site Plan 22047: Sundance Springs Neighborhood Services Lot # 2 Development Date:Friday, October 28, 2022 6:31:49 PM Attachments:Zale Public Comment Project 22047.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Ms. Hyde, Attached please find my letter concerning the above named site plan application. Please forward it to the Bozeman City Commission, the Bozeman Community Development Board, the Bozeman Community Development Directors, and the Bozeman City Planning Department. Many thanks! Sincerely, Alexander V. Zale 366 Peace Pipe DriveBozeman, MT 59715 cell 406-580-9864 zale@montana.edu Alexander V. Zale 366 Peace Pipe Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 28 October 2022 To: Bozeman City Commission Bozeman Community Development Board Bozeman Community Development Directors Bozeman City Planning Department From: Alexander V. Zale 366 Peace Pipe Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Public Comment on Site Plan 22047: Sundance Springs Neighborhood Services Lot # 2 Development Dear City Commissioners, Members of the Community Development Board, Community Development Directors, and Planning Department Staff, I look forward to seeing the vacant lot here in Sundance Springs developed commercially as originally intended. It is a great location and development of it will serve our community well. However, it needs to be developed as originally prescribed by the City Commission and in accordance with our covenants, which we residents expect. The proposed development does not fit the intent of the subdivision's Planned Unit Development (PUD) and it disregards the applicable requirements. I have the impression that the current proposal is being rushed through under pressure from the developer by overworked city staff unaware of the applicable history and requirements associated with this property. I am confident that if staff were aware of the relevant City Commission orders, PUD, and our covenants that they would not have allowed the application to progress to this point. My letter is submitted to inform you of these issues and the inappropriateness of approving this proposal in its current form. I therefore urge you to act at this time to deny approval given these numerous problems and issues. For example, the proposal lacks sidewalks along South Third Avenue, which are required by the PUD, and therefore limits walkability. Sidewalks should have been constructed there decades ago (“Upon the third anniversary of the plat acceptance for Sundance Springs Subdivision Phase 1B, any lot owner who has not constructed a sidewalk across their lot(s) frontage(s) shall without further notice construct sidewalks for their lot(s) regardless of whether other improvements have been made on the lot(s),” but pedestrians now walk along the shoulder there regularly, putting their safety at risk. That risk will only get greater when the site is developed. Both the site covenants and the PUD designate this site’s zoning as B-1 Neighborhood Services District according to the 1992-era zoning. However, the site plan is incompatible with both. The city must adhere to the orders of the 1990s era City Commission. In this case, the Commission ordered that the city be a party to the site covenants. Therefore, I expect the city to follow the requirements of the covenants, and to enforce the covenants per the authority of BMC 38.100.100. The proposed development violates a number of our covenants: Requirements for traditional gable, hip, and shed roofs (the proposed development has flat roofs). Siding requirements (which preclude buildings with glass walls as proposed). Maximum building size limits of 5000 square feet. Parking requirements outlined in Chapter 18.50 of the 1992-era zoning. 25-foot front and 20-foot rear setbacks. Foundations that are constructed “high” to avoid problems with high ground water (which I can attest to personally given the flooding of my crawl space before I installed a sump pump). Outdoor lighting design restrictions outlined in the covenants (all of our outdoor lighting is directed downwards to preserve the beauty of the night sky). Requirements to design of buildings that avoid the appearance of commercial development (per the covenants) and maintain residential character (per B-1 Neighborhood Services District). Also at issue is the 2,000 square foot outdoor patio (which would conflict with our right to the undisturbed peaceful use of our property written into the covenants if it were used by restaurant or brewpub patrons). Moreover, the 1992-era B-1 Neighborhood Services District set the expectation that all business uses be confined within buildings. Finally, the proposed development departs from the city’s Block Frontage Standards, which are designed to ensure that developments meet basic requirements for maintaining aesthetics of street frontages. The buildings do not front the street, parking is in front of the buildings, more than 50% of the street frontage is occupied by parking, and parking fronts a street corner; all of these violate the standards. Clearly, a large number of issues prevent this proposal from moving forward in its current form. However, all of them can be readily addressed. I urge you to deny approval of the proposal and request that the developer submit a revision that conforms to the requirements. The City of Bozeman is a party to the Sundance Springs covenants as ordered by the City Commission. It must therefore abide by and enforce the covenants on the site. Sincerely, Alexander V. Zale