Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWaterDesignReport-NWX Apartments NORTHWEST CROSSING NWX APARTMENTS WATER MAIN EXTENSION WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN REPORT June 23, 2022 PREPARED BY: MMI #: 5305.008 1 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 2 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1) .............................................................................................. 2 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM, INCLUDING (DEQ 1.1.2): ................................................. 3 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) ................................................................................................................ 3 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4) ................................................................................................................... 3 6 WATER USE DATA, INCLUDING (1.1.5): ........................................................................................... 3 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6) .......................................................................................................... 4 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7) ............................................................................................. 5 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) ................................................................................ 5 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9) ......................................................................................... 5 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10) ............................................................................................................ 5 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11) .................................................................................................................... 5 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12) ................................................................................................................ 5 14 FINANCING (1.1.13) ......................................................................................................................... 5 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14) ...................................................................................................... 5 EXHIBITS Exhibit A Vicinity Map Exhibit B Utility Plan (C1.3) Exhibit C Northwest Crossing Subdivision Final Plat- Sheet 4 APPENDICES Appendix A WaterCAD Results Appendix B NRCS Soil Report Prepared by: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, Montana 59771 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 NWX Apartments- Water Main Extension 2 Water Distribution Design Report 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides a basis for design for a water main extension through Lot 13 of Northwest Crossing Subdivision in order to serve the proposed NWX Apartments site. The water distribution system serving the Northwest Crossing development will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); The City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Fire Service Line Standard. The design report is to verify that there is adequate volume and pressure to supply domestic and fire service for Phase 1 of the Northwest Crossing development. The following design report follows the section numbering of Circular DEQ-1-Standards for Water Works, 2018 Edition, Section 1.1, Engineer’s Report. 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1) a. The proposed Northwest Crossing Subdivision encompasses a total of 160.5 acres and is generally located at the northwest corner of West Oak Street and Cottonwood Road. The property is within the boundaries of the City of Bozeman, Montana and was annexed and zoned REMU (130.994 acres) and B2-M (29.513 acres) in January of 2019. See the vicinity map on Exhibit A for location details. Phase 1 infrastructure was constructed in 2021. The NWX Apartments development is proposed to be constructed on Lots 1, 13 and 14. The following is the legal description for the property. Tract 5 of Certificate of Survey No. 2552, located in the NE1/4 of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, Gallatin County, Montana. Note: The Northwest Crossing Subdivision final Plat is in the process of being filed. b. The proposed water main infrastructure will be served by the City of Bozeman. The subdivision will also be served by an extension of the City of Bozeman’s sanitary sewer collection system. c. Project Developer NWX Apartments, LLC 1735 South 19th Ave, Suite B Bozeman, MT 59718 System Owner City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 3 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM, INCLUDING (DEQ 1.1.2): The proposed water main is an extension of the City of Bozeman water infrastructure. The proposed extension connects to existing 8-inch ductile iron stubs off of Rosa Way to the west and Twin Lakes Avenue to the east. The extension includes about 1170 linear feet of 8-inch pipe looped through the parking lot, domestic services, fire services and one new fire hydrant. This extension is needed to serve the NWX Apartments buildings 1 though 8. All other buildings will be served from existing mains that were installed as part of the Phase 1 infrastructure. 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) No alternate plans were considered. 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4) The proposed Northwest Crossing subdivision is currently a vacant development with all public infrastructure installed and ready for site development to begin. The land generally slopes from south to north with existing grades of less than 4% and mostly Amsterdam silt loam, Hyalite- Beaverton complex and Turner loam soil deposits (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey). Seasonal high ground water ranges from 1 foot to three feet below existing grade and generally flows to the north, northwest. 6 WATER USE DATA, INCLUDING (1.1.5): The water distribution system serving the proposed project will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); the City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. The following section addresses the design capacity and flow requirements discussed in Section 8 of DEQ – 1. The water main extension in Lot 13 of Phase 1 will serve 8 proposed multi-family residential buildings. Buildings 1,2,7 and 8 are three-story 32-plex designed with a six-inch diameter fire service line and four-inch diameter domestic water service. Buildings 3-6 are two story 3-plex designed with a four-inch fire service and 2-inch domestic service. One fire hydrant is proposed along the southern loop for air relief at the high point. For this analysis, the Northwest Crossing Subdivision Phase 1 water model was updated with water demand data reflecting the proposed NWX Apartments building location and density. The remainder of Phase 1 (parcels A and B) is not yet developed, nor are there plans for specific site development, so the estimated water demands match the original subdivision design and water usage data published in 2017 Water Facility Plan Update prepared for the City of Bozeman by AE2S. For the parcels zoned REMU, the 2017 Water Facility Plan lists an average day demand of 684 gallons per acre per day. While this value may be appropriate for master planning, it does not reflect the uses envisioned for this specific project as it appears significantly low based on a gallon per capita or dwelling unit basis. In order to review the validity of the 684 gallons per acre per day, we reviewed City of Bozeman plans and documents and found the latest data for detailed per capita water use in a technical memorandum that was completed as part of the City of Bozeman 2014 Water Conservation Plan. The average per capita per day use for residential 4 units was extrapolated from this information to be 87 gallons per capita per day. The NWX Apartments demands for this report are based on an estimated 2.17 people per dwelling unit and an average demand of 87 gallons per capita per day. Table 1 – Parcel Demand Other NWX Phase 1 Development Parcels Area (acres)Zoning Average Day Demand (gal/ acre/day) Average Daily Flow (gpm) Maximum Day (Gal/acre/day) Max Day Flow (gpm) A (Lots 6-12)9.03 B2-M 1285 8.06 2372 14.87 B (Lots 2-5)4.83 B2-M 1285 4.31 2372 7.96 TOTAL 13.86 -2570 12.37 4744 22.83 NWX Apartments Area (acres) Type A Buildings (3-Plex) Type B & C Buildings (32-plex)Total Units Average Daily Demand (gpm) Max Day Demand (gpm) Lot 1 2.62 0 2 64 8.39 19.30 Lot 13 5.26 4 4 140 18.35 42.22 Lot 14 7.78 4 2 76 9.96 22.92 Clubhouse - - - - 0.22 0.51 TOTAL 15.66 8 8 280 36.93 84.94 Clubhouse Demand- Estimated 24 employees/ guests with an average usage of 13 gpd per person (DEQ Circular 4) Fire Flow The total water demand for the system includes the Maximum Daily Demand and the maximum required fire flow of 1,500gpm which based on the predicted building of Type V-A Construction. Table B105.1(2) of Appendix B of the International Fire Code requires 5,500gpm fire flow for a building without sprinklers and allows a reduction for buildings with fire sprinklers. The reduced flow is 25% of the listed flow which is 1,375gpm. The minimum flow is 1,000gpm or 1,500gpm dependent on if the fire sprinkler system is designed to meet NFPA 13 or NFPA 13R requirements. For this report, it is conservatively assumed that 1,500gpm will be required. The Maximum Daily Demand is calculated by multiplying the Average Daily Demand by a peaking factor of 2.3. 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6) Modeling Procedure Water modeling using the proposed water main location was input into WaterCAD V8i software to assess expected performance of the new distribution network. Water supply from the existing City water system has been modeled by a reservoir and pump along West Oak to mimic distribution system output. Use of fire hydrant flow data and a reservoir/pump supply is a commonly used method to build a stand-alone model without reproducing the complete distribution system. The City of Bozeman Engineering Department provided current data from their hydraulic modeling software for hydrant #2947 (Oak St/ Abigail Ln) and #2010 (Oak St/ Cottonwood Rd). The total water demand for the system includes the maximum daily demand and the required fire flow of 1,500gpm as determined by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) criteria. The maximum daily demand is calculated by multiplying the average daily demand by a peaking 5 factor of 2.3. The minimum pressure used for pipe main sizing was 35-psi during normal uses and no less than 20-psi residual pressure during fire hydrant full flow condition at any supply node. A “C” of 130 is used for the Hazen Williams pipe roughness factor. Modeling Results The model’s results indicate that 8-inch distribution main looped through the parking lot within Lot 13 will supply the needed maximum daily flow with fire flow while maintaining the required 20-psi residual pressure at all points within the modeled area. Pressure during max day ranges from 84 to 103 psi. The available fire flow is 3,500gpm for the development. (See the WaterCAD model flow results located in the appendix at the end of this report for additional information). 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7) Water is supplied from City of Bozeman 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) Not applicable 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9) The area is served by the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10) Not applicable 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11) Not applicable 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12) The development is bounded by Baxter Lane to the north, Cottonwood Road to the east, Laurel Parkway to the west and West Oak Street to the south. The wastewater at the site will be conveyed to the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility. 14 FINANCING (1.1.13) Not applicable 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14) No future extension was considered with this design. All future connections were accounted for with the design of the Phase 1 subdivision infrastructure. N:\5659\006_NWX_Phase1Design\04 Design\Reports\Water and Sewer\Water Report- NWX Update.doc Exhibit A Vicinity Map 11THSAVE19THNAVE27THNAVE15THNAVEINTERSTATE 90 191HUFFINELN W LINCOLN ST W GARFIELD ST W COLLEGE W BABCOCK ST MAIN STW COTTONWOODRD235 BAXTER LN F R O N T A G E R D OAK STW 27THAVENDURSTON RDDAVISLNPROJECT LOCATION HARPER-RDPUCKETTSPRINGHILLRDV A L L E Y R D C E N T E R E NAVEFERGUSONengineerssurveyorsplannersscientists 2880 Technology Boulevard West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 VICINITY MAP SCALE:1" = 3000' Exhibit B Utility Plan (C1.3) MAIL6" FIRE4" DOMESTIC 6" FIRE 4" DOMESTIC 6" FIRE 4" DOMESTIC 6" FIRE4" DOMESTIC FIREDOMEST I C FIREDOMESTIC 6" FIRE4" DOMESTIC 6" FIRE 4" DOMES T I C 6" FIRE4" DOMESTIC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD DDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDDDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD DDDDSD SD SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDDDDDDDDSDSD SDDSDD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDS89°30'03"W 2649.87'S S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S8S8S 8S 8S8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S8S 12S 12S 12S 12S 12S 12S 12S 12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S 12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S12S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W W W W W W W W W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W 8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W WS WSWSWS8WWS WS 8W8W8W8WWSDYHDYHSSSSSSSSTPTPTPTPWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEWEWEWEWEWEWEWEWEWEWEWESESESESESESESESESESESESESESESDESDESDEWEWEWEWEWEWEWCOESDESDESDESDESDESDESDESDESDESDESDESDESDESD8S8W 8W 8W 8W 8S 8S 8S 8S8S8S8S8S 8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8S8S8S8S8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8WWSFIREWS WSFIREFIREWS WSSDSDDDDSDSDSDSD SD SDDDDSDSDDD DSD SD SD SD SD SDD DDDSDDDDDDSDSDDSDDDSD PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPEEEEEEEEE EE EEEEEEEEEEEEEE E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE E E E E EEEEEEEGGGG G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGG G GGG G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGSDSDSDSDBLDG 3BLDG 4BLDG 1BLDG 2BLDG 5BLDG 6BLDG 7BLDG 8BLDG 9BLDG 10BLDG 11BLDG 12BLDG 13BLDG 14BLDG 15BLDG 16BLDG 17BLDG 18M408020400SCALE IN FEETUTILITY PLANC1.3.TWIN LAKES AVENUEHARVEST PARKWAYROSA WAYWELLSPRING DRIVEW. OAK STREETMEE OWNER:DATE:SHEET TITLE:OWNER:DATE:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY: NWX APARTMENTS- AN ICON COMMUNITY BOZEMAN, MONTANABLACKRIDGE COMPANIES1735 SOUTH 19TH AVESUITE BBOZEMAN, MT 59718OFFICE: 406.582.8100FAX: 406.582.8108244 North College Avenue #130Fort Collins, Colorado 80524P 970.409.3414www.norris-design.com10/29/2021EXISTING SEWERSERVICE STUB (TYP.)EXISTING STORM DRAIN (TYP.)EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.)EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.)SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONSHEETS C2.1 &C2.2WATER MAIN EXTENSIONSEE SHEETS C3.1 - C3.3NOTES BY SYMBOL:4" SDR 35 SEWER SERVICE6" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE6" DUCTILE IRON FIRE SERVICE4" DUCTILE IRON WATER SERVICE2" COPPER WATER SERVICE6"4"6"4"2"2"4"2"4"4"4"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"4"4"4"4"4"4"4"4"4"4"6"2"2"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"4"4"4"4"6"6"6"UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM- SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE SHEETS111111.EXISTING SEWER SERVICE STUBS INSTALLED WITH THE SUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE AREINSTALLED TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN STANDARD LOCATION OF 8 FEET BEYOND THE PROPERTYLINE.2.EXISTING 4-INCH WATER SERVICE STUBS AND 6-INCH FIRE SERVICE STUBS INSTALLED WITH THESUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE ARE INSTALLED TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND TERMINATE WITH AGATE VALVE.3.EXISTING 2-INCH WATER SERVICE STUBS INSTALLED WITH THE SUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE AREINSTALLED TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN STANDARD LOCATION OF 8FT BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE.4.PROPOSED 4-INCH AND 6-INCH WATER SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED WATERMAIN EXTENSION WITHIN LOT 13 SHALL HAVE NEW GATE VALVE INSTALLED ON THE SERVICE AT THEMAIN.5.PROPOSED 2-INCH WATER SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED WATER MAINEXTENSION SHALL HAVE A NEW CURB STOP INSTALLED AS NOTED ON THE PLAN. CURB STOPSSHALL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WHEN POSSIBLE. DO NOT INSTALL CURBSTOPS IN PARKING AREAS.UTILITY NOTES:EXISTING WATER AND FIRESERVICE STUBS (TYP.)UTILITYEASEMENT(TYP.)PHASE 1 BOUNDARYPHASE 2 BOUNDARYUNDERGROUND GAS, ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONSUUUUUUUUUEXISTING GROUNDWATERDRAIN CLEANOUT (TYP.)EXISTING GROUNDWATERDRAIN PIPE (TYP.)6.40'17.08'6.23'15.08'1TYPE A BUILDINGRISER ROOM DIMENSIONSSCALE: 1" = 5'2TYPE B AND C BUILDINGSRISER ROOM DIMENSIONSSCALE: 1" = 5'BUILDING # 3,4,5,6,17,18BUILDING # 1,2,7,8,10,12,13,14,15,16EXTERIOR DOOREXTERIOR DOOR4721.714721.71EXISTING SEWER SERVICE STUB INVERT ELEVATION4721.454721.654728.874728.364729.424733.364733.114730.364724.804722.224720.544723.814728.80TRANSFORMERNEW 2" CURB STOPXXXX6"X1REVISION #1- ADDRESS CITY COMMENTSMASTER SITE PLAN10/29/21: MSP 0106/02/22: MSP 01PROPOSED NWXAPARTMENTSWATER MAINEXTENSIONINSTALLED WITH NORTHWESTCROSSING SUBDIVISIONPHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS Exhibit C Northwest Crossing Subdivision Final Plat Sheet 4 LOT 13 7.10 acs. S89°30'03"W 1310.89'S89°30'03"W 1042.64' LOT 3 1.21 acs.N0°59'41"E 1144.41'LOT 10 1.09 acs. LOT 12 1.40 acs. LOT 9 0.81 acs.S31°06'03"W68.85'L67L41L43L44 L42L45L46L47C37 S78°41'34"W 227.20' S78°41'34" W 259.71'L31L30L29 L28S74°07'45"W 106.89'C3S89°27'38"W 164.86' N78°41'34"E 447.36'C39C35C38C34LOT 5 1.25 acs. LOT 8 0.57 acs.C44C45 L60 L61 C47 C48C54 C53 L65C49C50C57C51 C56LOT 14 5.26 acs. LOT 6 2.46 acs. LOT 7 1.48 acs. LOT 1 2.62 acs. N89°27'46"E 2675.75'S0°59'41"W 2627.49'LOT 11 0.78 acs. LOT 2 0.75 acs. LOT 4 1.62 acs. S16°02'20"E 15.42' S50°28'23"E 400.00' S50°28'23"E 316.57' S74°53'10"E 339.78'86.47'177.25'66.00'145.73'265.14'219.94'4.41' 1069.14'31.90'1361.76' 60.00'213.96'222.53'39.78'80.41' 19.91' S78°41'34"W 104.53' S88°31'14"W 513.51'N11°23'09"W369.97'S16°28'13"E467.48'N0°30'35"W440.63'S0°02'56"W515.88'N89°27'46"E 264.86' N90°00'00"W 256.26'202.53'148.06'N0°00'00"E228.57'N0°00'00"E179.96'N90°00'00"E 160.03' N88°31'14"E 110.22' N90°00'00"W 160.07'239.13'S89°27'46"W 188.44' N71°21' 0 8 " E 155.10' N18°58'23"W 77.06'S16°28'13"E461.51'N0°59'08"E104.41'S89°57'07"E 149.49' S89°57'07"E 264.93'S0°02'56"W284.14'N88°59'57"W 93.53' N90°00'00"W 180.20'S0°00'00"E134.38'N15°26'36"W164.99'N90°00'00"W 226.13' N89°27'46"E 206.76'S0°32'15"E133.91'N16°28'08"W322.99'N24°37'33"E 44.59'N0°32'14"W115.05'N0°30'35"W441.03'S33°39'13"W 19.81' 21.00' 20.00' 1.89'231.11'S89°27'45"W 188.95' N89°27'46"E 661.96' N78°41'34"E 547.89'N11°23'09"W419.57'S0°02'56"WPARK 2 5.28 acs. RESTRICTED LOT 2 8.78 acs. RESTRICTED LOT 4 8.73 acs. RESTRICTED LOT 1 11.67 acs. RESTRICTED LOT 3 12.29 acs.S0°32'14"E690.00'N89°27'45"E 823.76'N89°27'45"E 554.50'N0°00'00"E281.28'N11°23'09"W154.38'S16°12'27"E66.15'C59S0°32'14"E531.43'C61C60C62118.01'N67°07' 2 5 " E 1 7 1 . 5 3'71.02'3.10' 505.77'60.00' 35.50'C58N0°00'00"E 412.50'385.02'548.03'561.90' PARK 1 4.33 acs. RESTRICTED LOT 5 2.51 acs. N90°00'00"E 66.09' L=147.28, R=770.00 Δ=10°57'33" N79°02'27"E 38.62' 10.57'N0°00'00"E408.75'N9°01'50"W 30.02' PARK 3 6.93 acs. 263.62'N0°29'58"W175.74'S89°30'02"W 92.85' N47°02'36"W 9.84'N0°30'04"W199.93'N4°52'57"E 11.55'S37°15'06"E 34.15' S55°49'35"W 32.31'N0°29'58"W117.44'N11°20'10"W341.72'N27°55 '30 "W101.08 'N28°26 '25 "W126.71 ' N13°19'15"W 36.38' N35°34'05"W 38.93' N7°34'27"W 37.97'N11°20'10"W151.00'401.78'142.63'N89°44'34"E 215.70'S1°16'44"E83.10'N24°37'33"E 12.42' PARCEL LINE DATA SEGMENT L41 L42 L43 L44 L45 L46 L47 L60 L61 L65 L67 LENGTH 46.14 59.77 13.60 32.22 45.01 34.07 85.16 219.94 64.68 35.00 52.76 DIRECTION S22° 03' 59"W S4° 02' 53"E S9° 06' 05"E S4° 47' 23"W S3° 20' 12"E S3° 39' 52"E S9° 01' 50"E S0° 59' 08"W S78° 41' 34"W S14° 26' 58"E S41° 43' 00"W PARCEL CURVE DATA SEGMENT C34 C35 C37 C38 C39 C44 C45 C47 C48 C49 C50 C51 C53 C54 C56 C57 C58 C59 C60 C61 C62 LENGTH 96.11 52.96 34.87 162.62 46.85 142.71 90.93 21.52 23.62 42.63 179.64 92.16 38.15 22.94 97.79 70.30 164.94 41.71 495.61 607.68 197.66 RADIUS 517.00 517.00 185.50 1030.00 1030.00 388.91 380.00 114.50 685.00 685.00 685.00 380.00 380.00 380.00 583.00 583.00 830.00 150.00 7929.59 7929.59 970.00 DELTA 010°39'04" 005°52'07" 010°46'12" 009°02'45" 002°36'21" 021°01'30" 013°42'35" 010°46'12" 001°58'33" 003°33'55" 015°01'33" 013°53'45" 005°45'10" 003°27'31" 009°36'39" 006°54'31" 011°23'09" 015°55'58" 003°34'52" 004°23'27" 011°40'32" ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2022 PLOTTED DATE: Jun/01/2022 PLOTTED BY: jon c. wilkinson DRAWING NAME: N:\5659\005 NWX Phase 1 Major Sub\ACAD\Survey\FPLAT\5659005_NWX-PH1_FPLAT PLOT.dwg 1/4 SEC.SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE PROJ. #:SHEET OF PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA COUNTY, MONTANADATE: SCALE: CLIENT: FIELD WORK: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 Fax: 406.922.6702 54NWX, LLC GALLATIN 5659.005 1:100 6/1/2022 MEE CJF MMI 5E 2S 04NE TRACT 5 OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 2552, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. FINAL PLAT NORTHWEST CROSSING SUBDIVISION - PHASE 1 HARVEST PARKWAY (71')COTTONWOOD ROAD (120')WEST OAK STREET (125') BAXTER LANE 100')TWIN LAKES AVENUE (66')ROSA WAY (60')EXISTING PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. 2646562 EXISTING PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. 2646562 60.0' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. 2649280 ZONING CITY OF BOZEMAN - B-2 & REMU PURPOSE TO CREATE 14 B2M / REMU LOTS, 15 RESTRICTED LOTS, AND CREATE PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES. 50.0' PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT 20.0' GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT DOC. 2329665 20.0' GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT DOC. 232966550.0' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. 2649280 10.0' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. 2649281 10.0' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. 2649281 10.0' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. 2649281 BAXTER DITCH DELINEATED WETLAND BOUNDARY ZONE 1 WATERCOURSE SETBACK ZONE 2 WATERCOURSE SETBACK NOTE: 1.LOT DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW. (SEE NOTE 1) (SEE NOTE 1)(SEE NOTE 1) (SEE NOTE 1) (SEE NOTE 1) BLO C K 3 BLO C K 2 BLO C K 1 BLO C K 4 BAXTER DITCH 70.0' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' P.U.E. TYP WELLS P R I N G D R I V E DAYSPRING AVENUEZONE 1 WATERCOURSE SETBACK ZONE 2 WATERCOURSE SETBACK 30.0' PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT 50.0' PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT 60.0' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' GROUNDWATER DRAIN EASEMENT 10' GROUNDWATER DRAIN EASEMENT 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP 10' GROUNDWATER DRAIN EASEMENT TEMPORARY10' GROUNDWATER DRAIN EASEMENT WILL CEASE TO EXIST WHEN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THIS AREA IS COMPLETED STORMWATER EASEMENT DOC.________________ STORMWATER EASEMENT DOC.________________ ELEVATION DATUM = NAVD 88 RECOMMENDED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION RESET SECTION CORNER. SEE C.C.R. DOC.# 2412303 SIGN EASEMENT SIGN EASEMENT SIGN EASEMENT SIGN EASEMENT SIGN EASEMENT SIGN EASEMENT RESET 14 SECTION CORNER. SEE C.C.R. DOC.# 153209 OWNER NWX, LLC 1735 SOUTH 19TH AVE. BOZEMAN, MT 59718 BASIS OF BEARING Bobcat Coordinate System, NAD83(2011) per the "Rocky Mountain Tribal Coordinate Reference System" Handbook and User Guide, Published September 30th, 2014 and subsequent revisions, established by observations with survey-grade GNSS receivers. WELL EASEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' P.U.E. TYP 10' GROUNDWATER DRAIN EASEMENT 10' GROUNDWATER DRAIN EASEMENT ALL LOTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING UTILITY EASEMENTS (EXCEPT THE RESTRICTED LOTS): - 10' ALONG PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY - 10' ALONG SIDE LOT LINES - 10' ALONG REAR LOT LINES PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS (P.U.E.) 60.0' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. _________________ 60.0' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. _________________ 60.0' PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. _________________ 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP 1' - NO ACCESS STRIP LOTS - 28.40 ACRES PARK - 16.54 ACRES RESTRICTED LOTS - 95.95 ACRES RIGHT-OF-WAY - 5.33 ACRES TOTAL - 146.22 ACRES AREA SUMMARY LEGEND Found 2" diameter AC per C.C.R. Book 4, Page 276. Document No. 2412303 Monument destroyed from new road construction. Reset 2 1/2" diameter A.C. "MMI 16411LS" Set a rebar 5/8" diam., with an orange plastic cap, "MMI 16411LS". Found 2" diam. AC "9518 ES" per C.C.R. Book 2 Page 1427. Document # 336115 Found 5 8" diam. rebar per C.C.R. Book 2, Page 251. Document No. 153209. Monument destroyed from new road construction. Reset 2 1/2" diameter A.C. "MMI 16411LS" Found 2 diameter MDT A.C. per C.C.R. Book 3, Page 922. Document No. 2294184 (R1) Certificate of Survey No. 2552 Calculated point - Not Set Appendix A WaterCAD Results Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model ReportNetwork SchematicPhase 1 Page 1 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg P-33(1)P-35(1) P-196 P-166(1) P-192(2) P-191(1) P-190 P-219 P-137 P-135P-134 P-133P-132 P-126 P-123 P-121P-120 P-118 P-97 P-94 P-32 P-11 P-8 P-8 P-7P-5P-4P-3 P-481 P-48 7 P-486 P-192(1)(1) P-468 P-482P-165(2) P-35(2)(2)P-35(2)(1) P-216 P-476 P-4 75 P-192(1)(2)(2)P-192(1)(2)(1)P-472P-165(1) P-220 P-467 P-480 P-479 P-166(2) P-203 P-202 P-191(2)(2)P-191(2)(1) P-131(2) P-131(1) P-34(2)P-34(1)P-33(2) Bldg 7 Bldg 1 Bldg 5 Bldg 18 Bldg 17 J-420 J-31 J-419 J-418 J-417 J-199 Bldg 10 Bldg 13 Bldg 4Bldg 3 J-198 Bldg 9 Bldg 2 J-17 Bldg 8 Bldg 12 J-424 J-151 J-150 J-148 J-147 J-146J-144 J-142 J-141J-140 J-138 J-136 J-135 J-134 J-133 J-131 J-128 J-126 J-124 J-120 J-99 J-98 J-97 J-96 J-95 J-93 J-92 J-91 J-90 J-89 J-86 J-80 J-74 J-73 J-72 J-70 J-37J-36J-35 J-34 J-33 J-29 J-28 J-9 J-10 J-8J-8 J-7J-6J-5J-4J-3 Bldg 6 Bldg 14 Bldg 15 Bldg 16 J-47 J-197 PMP-1 R-1 H-35 H-18 H-17 H-16 H-15 H-14 H-13 H-12 H-11 H-6 H-5 H-2 H-1 H-4 H-6 H-3 H-2H-1 H-5 Color Coding Legend Pipe: Diameter (in) <= 1.0 <= 6.0 <= 8.0 <= 10.0 <= 16.0 <= 36.0 Other EXTENT OF NWX APARTMENTS WATER MAIN EXTENSION W. OAK STREETROSA WAYHARVES T P A R K W A Y Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) ZoneElevation (ft) LabelID 4,738.5357.68<None>4,738.53R-1104 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge ) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Pump Status Pump Definition Elevation (ft) Label 226.2057.684,964.734,738.53On Pump Definition - Oak 4,738.53PMP-1 Page 2 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 984,964.720.004,738.45J-3 974,964.710.004,739.69J-4 964,964.700.004,741.77J-5 964,964.690.004,742.18J-6 954,964.690.004,745.07J-7 954,964.690.004,745.07J-8 944,964.690.004,746.55J-8 984,964.720.004,738.53J-10 984,964.720.004,737.97J-9 1044,964.690.004,724.17J-28 1004,964.690.004,734.20J-29 1034,964.690.004,726.00J-33 1044,964.690.004,724.14J-34 1044,964.690.004,724.79J-35 1044,964.690.004,724.71J-36 1034,964.690.004,727.48J-37 1014,964.690.004,732.28J-70 994,964.690.004,735.55J-72 1004,964.690.004,732.70J-73 1014,964.690.004,731.63J-74 1044,964.690.004,724.73J-80 1024,964.690.004,728.12J-86 1014,964.690.004,731.34J-89 1014,964.690.004,732.23J-90 1004,964.690.004,732.98J-91 984,964.690.004,739.30J-92 974,964.690.004,739.34J-93 964,964.690.004,743.78J-95 994,964.690.004,736.41J-96 1014,964.690.004,731.82J-97 1004,964.690.004,732.49J-98 1014,964.690.004,731.57J-99 1034,964.690.004,725.86J-120 1024,964.690.004,728.54J-124 1014,964.690.004,731.19J-126 1024,964.690.004,728.02J-128 1004,964.690.004,734.24J-131 994,964.690.004,736.76J-133 1034,964.690.004,726.77J-134 1024,964.690.004,727.91J-135 1014,964.690.004,731.42J-136 1034,964.690.004,727.05J-138 994,964.690.004,735.24J-140 924,964.698.064,751.00J-141 1024,964.690.004,729.47J-142 Page 3 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 1044,964.690.004,724.75J-144 1034,964.690.004,726.45J-146 954,964.694.314,746.00J-147 1014,964.690.004,731.57J-148 1014,964.690.004,731.51J-150 1014,964.690.004,730.46J-151 1074,964.690.004,718.49J-17 1074,964.690.004,717.15J-31 1064,964.690.004,720.35J-47 1034,964.690.004,725.96J-197 1044,964.690.004,725.38J-198 1014,964.690.004,730.78J-199 Page 4 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label 0.2457.68130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-4J-3209P-3 0.2457.68130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-5J-4421P-4 0.1331.95130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-6J-5569P-5 0.0615.83130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-8J-725P-7 0.0615.83130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-8J-8103P-8 0.37-57.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-325P-9 0.37-57.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10J-961P-10 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-9H-130P-8 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-10H-240P-11 0.3757.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0PMP- 1R-127P-11 0.3757.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10PMP-124P-12 0.03-4.23130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-34128P-32 0.046.15130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-74J-73104P-85 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-72H-516P-94 0.02-2.37130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-8063P-96 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-80H-617P-97 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-86J-3738P-111 0.023.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-90J-8951P-115 0.022.99130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-91J-9059P-116 0.03-5.07130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-93J-92150P-118 0.0615.83130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-95J-6274P-120 0.0615.83130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-7J-95245P-121 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-86H-1119P-123 Page 5 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label 0.03-5.07130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-92J-9697P-125 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-96H-129P-126 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-36H-1316P-127 0.05-7.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-98J-89103P-132 0.05-7.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-98118P-133 0.03-4.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-99J-7451P-134 0.03-4.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-97J-99189P-135 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-14J-9912P-136 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-90H-1512P-137 0.02-3.14130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-124J-33163P-171 0.07-11.56130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-70J-12656P-175 0.07-11.56130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-128J-70263P-177 0.16-25.73130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-5J-128373P-178 0.046.15130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-131157P-182 0.1016.12130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-133J-6277P-83(1) 0.0711.06130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-72J-13362P-83(2) 0.035.07130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-93J-133294P-190 0.0711.06130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-134J-7228P-181 (1) 0.046.15130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-131J-13479P-181 (2) 0.0710.24130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-135J-74164P-95(1) 0.011.84130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-80J-135337P-95(2) 0.000.02130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-136J-126302P-191 (1) 0.03-4.90130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-134J-138144P-192 (2) Page 6 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label 0.022.99130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-140J-91196P-124 (1) 0.03-5.07130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-96J-140111P-124 (2) 0.098.06130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-141J-140117P-196 0.05-8.54130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-142J-37155P-35(1) 0.03-4.23130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-144J-3560P-33(1) 0.03-4.23130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-36J-144130P-33(2) 0.03-4.23130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-146J-36111P-34(1) 0.05-8.54130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-146103P-34(2) 0.054.31130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-147J-146132P-199 0.03-4.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-148J-97110P-131 (1) 0.03-4.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-89J-14899P-131 (2) 0.000.02130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-150J-136113P-191 (2)(1) 0.00-0.20130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-74J-150162P-191 (2)(2) 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-16J-15014P-201 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-18J-3339P-202 0.02-3.14130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-151J-124221P-174 (1) 0.07-11.55130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-126J-15184P-174 (2) 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-17J-15111P-203 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-3364P-19 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-3160P-34 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-4736P-51 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-1J-1713P-216 0.023.13130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-197J-3376P-165 (1) Page 7 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label 0.023.13130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-120J-197180P-165 (2) 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-197H-213P-217 0.012.35130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-198J-12072P-166 (1) 0.01-1.85130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-198187P-166 (2) 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-198H-314P-218 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-31H-48P-219 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-47H-513P-220 0.05-8.54130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-199J-142103P-35(2) (1) 0.05-8.54130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-28J-19938P-35(2) (2) 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-199H-614P-221 Page 8 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) ZoneElevation (ft) LabelID 4,738.53115.58<None>4,738.53R-1104 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge ) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Pump Status Pump Definition Elevation (ft) Label 226.11115.584,964.634,738.52On Pump Definition - Oak 4,738.53PMP-1 Page 9 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 984,964.590.004,738.45J-3 974,964.570.004,739.69J-4 964,964.520.004,741.77J-5 964,964.500.004,742.18J-6 984,964.620.004,738.53J-10 984,964.600.004,737.97J-9 1024,964.480.004,728.02J-128 1034,964.480.004,726.77J-134 1034,964.480.004,727.05J-138 1014,964.480.144,731.77J-417 1014,964.480.144,732.00J-418 1014,964.480.144,732.00J-419 1024,964.480.144,727.69J-420 844,964.479.664,770.00Bldg 1 864,964.479.664,766.00Bldg 7 1034,964.480.144,727.33J-424 854,964.479.664,768.00Bldg 8 844,964.479.664,770.00Bldg 2 914,964.470.904,754.00Bldg 3 904,964.470.904,756.00Bldg 4 914,964.470.904,754.00Bldg 5 914,964.470.904,755.00Bldg 6 Page 10 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label 0.47115.57130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-4J-3209P-3 0.47115.57130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-5J-4421P-4 0.2254.28130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-6J-5569P-5 0.74-115.57130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-325P-9 0.74-115.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10J-961P-10 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-9H-130P-8 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-10H-240P-11 0.74115.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0PMP- 1R-127P-11 0.74115.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10PMP-124P-12 0.39-61.29130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-5J-128373P-178 0.1523.41130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-131157P-182 0.3554.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-133J-6277P-83(1) 0.08-13.06130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-134J-138144P-192 (2) 0.022.64130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-417J-138215P-466 0.011.60130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-418J-417145P-467 0.011.46130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-419J-418129P-468 0.1929.87130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-420J-128144P-192 (1)(1) 0.06-9.23130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-420J-419214P-469 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-418H-3525P-471 0.259.66130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 1J-41969P-472 0.259.66130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 7J-42073P-473 0.069.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-424J-420159 P-192 (1)(2) (1) Page 11 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label 0.000.14130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-138J-424122 P-192 (1)(2) (2) 0.259.66130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 8J-42466P-474 0.259.66130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 2J-13870P-475 0.090.90135.0Copper2.0Bldg 3J-41946P-477 0.090.90135.0Copper2.0Bldg 4J-41747P-478 0.090.90135.0Copper2.0Bldg 5J-42076P-487 0.090.90135.0Copper2.0Bldg 6J-13868P-488 Page 12 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Fire Flow Fire Flow Report - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity of Maximu m Pipe (ft/s) Pipe w/ Maximu m Velocity Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (System) Pressure (Calculate d Zone Lower Limit) (psi) Pressur e (Calcul ated Residua l) (psi) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Fire Flow (Available ) (gpm) Fire Flow (Needed ) (gpm) Fire Flow Iterat ions Label 39.72P-94Bldg 22331203,500.001,500.002H-5 36.09P-97Bldg 122031203,180.741,500.006H-6 30.30P-123J-1472320202,670.301,500.004H-11 38.95P-126J-1412022203,432.491,500.006H-12 32.36P-127J-1472026202,852.131,500.006H-13 39.72P-136Bldg 102128203,500.001,500.002H-14 39.60P-137J-1412020203,489.541,500.004H-15 39.72P-201Bldg 102122203,500.001,500.003H-16 38.37P-203Bldg 132028203,381.561,500.005H-17 36.72P-202Bldg 162120203,236.431,500.004H-18 36.74P-217Bldg 162025203,237.901,500.006H-2 35.42P-218Bldg 162029203,121.481,500.006H-3 36.38P-219Bldg 122028203,205.751,500.006H-4 30.65P-220J-1472120202,701.301,500.004H-5 28.25P-221J-1992220202,489.361,500.003H-6 38.22P-471Bldg 12023203,368.541,500.006H-35 Page 13 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) ZoneElevation (ft) LabelID 4,738.53329.27<None>4,738.53R-1104 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge ) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Pump Status Pump Definition Elevation (ft) Label 225.45329.274,963.914,738.47On Pump Definition - Oak 4,738.53PMP-1 Page 14 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 974,963.660.004,738.45J-3 974,963.490.004,739.69J-4 964,963.160.004,741.77J-5 964,963.000.004,742.18J-6 974,963.860.004,738.53J-10 984,963.710.004,737.97J-9 984,962.970.004,728.02J-128 994,962.940.004,726.77J-134 984,962.930.004,727.05J-138 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,731.77J-417 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,732.00J-418 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,732.00J-419 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,727.69J-420 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,770.00Bldg 1 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,766.00Bldg 7 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,727.33J-424 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,768.00Bldg 8 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,770.00Bldg 2 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,754.00Bldg 3 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,756.00Bldg 4 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,754.00Bldg 5 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)4,755.00Bldg 6 Page 15 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label 1.35329.27130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-4J-3209P-3 1.35329.27130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-5J-4421P-4 0.76185.94130.0Ductile Iron10.0J-6J-5569P-5 2.10-329.27130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-325P-9 2.10-329.27130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10J-961P-10 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-9H-130P-8 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-10H-240P-11 2.10329.27130.0Ductile Iron8.0PMP- 1R-127P-11 2.10329.27130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10PMP-124P-12 0.91-143.33130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-5J-128373P-178 0.2030.80130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-131157P-182 0.5992.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-133J-6277P-83(1) 0.15-23.19130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-134J-138144P-192 (2) (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-417J-138215P-466 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-418J-417145P-467 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-419J-418129P-468 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-420J-128144P-192 (1)(1) (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-420J-419214P-469 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-418H-3525P-471 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 1J-41969P-472 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 7J-42073P-473 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-424J-420159 P-192 (1)(2) (1) Page 16 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Northwest Crossing Apartments Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Haze n- Willia ms C MaterialDiame ter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled ) (ft) Label (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-138J-424122 P-192 (1)(2) (2) (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 8J-42466P-474 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron4.0Bldg 2J-13870P-475 (N/A)(N/A)135.0Copper2.0Bldg 3J-41946P-477 (N/A)(N/A)135.0Copper2.0Bldg 4J-41747P-478 (N/A)(N/A)135.0Copper2.0Bldg 5J-42076P-487 (N/A)(N/A)135.0Copper2.0Bldg 6J-13868P-488 Page 17 of 1727 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 7/6/2022 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterNWX-Apartments_WaterCAD.wtg Appendix B NRCS Soils Report United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallatin County Area, Montana Northwest Crossing Subdivision Natural Resources Conservation Service February 10, 2020 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Gallatin County Area, Montana.......................................................................13 53B—Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................13 448A—Hyalite-Beaverton complex, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes....................................................................................................14 451C—Quagle-Brodyk silt loams, 4 to 8 percent slopes.............................16 453B—Amsterdam-Quagle silt loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................18 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes.......................20 509B—Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes...................................................22 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................23 537A—Lamoose silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes........................................24 References............................................................................................................27 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 5059700505980050599005060000506010050602005060300506040050605005060600506070050608005060900506100050597005059800505990050600005060100506020050603005060400506050050606005060700506080050609005061000491100 491200 491300 491400 491500 491600 491700 491800 491900 492000 491100 491200 491300 491400 491500 491600 491700 491800 491900 492000 45° 42' 10'' N 111° 6' 55'' W45° 42' 10'' N111° 6' 6'' W45° 41' 25'' N 111° 6' 55'' W45° 41' 25'' N 111° 6' 6'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 300 600 1200 1800 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Meters Map Scale: 1:6,740 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 23, Sep 16, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 10, 2012—Nov 12, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 53B Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 34.1 18.0% 448A Hyalite-Beaverton complex, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes 32.2 17.0% 451C Quagle-Brodyk silt loams, 4 to 8 percent slopes 3.7 1.9% 453B Amsterdam-Quagle silt loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes 6.4 3.4% 457A Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes 39.9 21.0% 509B Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 2.9 1.5% 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 51.3 27.0% 537A Lamoose silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 19.3 10.2% Totals for Area of Interest 189.8 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas Custom Soil Resource Report 11 are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Gallatin County Area, Montana 53B—Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56ws Elevation: 4,400 to 5,550 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Amsterdam and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Amsterdam Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loess Typical profile A - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam Bw - 8 to 15 inches: silt loam Bk - 15 to 42 inches: silt loam 2C - 42 to 60 inches: very fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 35 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT), Upland Grassland (R044BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Minor Components Quagle Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Limy (Ly) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS357MT) Hydric soil rating: No Blackdog Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No Bowery Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No Meagher Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No 448A—Hyalite-Beaverton complex, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56sq Elevation: 4,450 to 5,300 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Hyalite and similar soils: 70 percent Beaverton and similar soils: 20 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Custom Soil Resource Report 14 Description of Hyalite Setting Landform: Stream terraces, alluvial fans Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: loam Bt1 - 5 to 9 inches: clay loam Bt2 - 9 to 17 inches: silty clay loam 2Bt3 - 17 to 26 inches: very cobbly sandy clay loam 3C - 26 to 60 inches: very cobbly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT), Upland Grassland (R044BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Beaverton Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: cobbly loam Bt - 5 to 21 inches: very gravelly clay loam Bk - 21 to 25 inches: very cobbly coarse sandy loam 2Bk - 25 to 60 inches: extremely cobbly loamy coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding: None Custom Soil Resource Report 15 Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT), Upland Grassland (R044BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Beaverton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT) Hydric soil rating: No Meadowcreek Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS359MT) Hydric soil rating: No 451C—Quagle-Brodyk silt loams, 4 to 8 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56sy Elevation: 4,350 to 5,150 feet Mean annual precipitation: 14 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Quagle and similar soils: 70 percent Brodyk and similar soils: 20 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Custom Soil Resource Report 16 Description of Quagle Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty calcareous loess Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam Bw - 6 to 9 inches: silt loam Bk - 9 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 4 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 35 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Limy (Ly) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS357MT), Upland Grassland (R044BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Brodyk Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty calcareous loess Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam Bk1 - 6 to 30 inches: silt loam Bk2 - 30 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 4 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Custom Soil Resource Report 17 Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 30 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Limy (Ly) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS357MT), Limy Grassland (R044BP804MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Amsterdam Percent of map unit: 8 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No Anceney Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty-Droughty (SiDr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS690MT) Hydric soil rating: No 453B—Amsterdam-Quagle silt loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56t5 Elevation: 4,400 to 5,450 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Amsterdam and similar soils: 60 percent Quagle and similar soils: 30 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Custom Soil Resource Report 18 Description of Amsterdam Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loess Typical profile A - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam Bw - 8 to 15 inches: silt loam Bk - 15 to 42 inches: silt loam 2C - 42 to 60 inches: very fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 35 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT), Upland Grassland (R044BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Quagle Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty calcareous loess Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam Bw - 6 to 9 inches: silt loam Bk - 9 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Custom Soil Resource Report 19 Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 35 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Limy (Ly) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS357MT), Upland Grassland (R044BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Beanlake Percent of map unit: 6 percent Landform: Stream terraces, alluvial fans Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Limy (Ly) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS357MT) Hydric soil rating: No Meagher Percent of map unit: 4 percent Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56tb Elevation: 4,300 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Turner and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Custom Soil Resource Report 20 Description of Turner Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bt - 6 to 12 inches: clay loam Bk - 12 to 26 inches: clay loam 2C - 26 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT), Upland Grassland (R044BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Turner Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No Beaverton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces, alluvial fans Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT) Hydric soil rating: No Meadowcreek Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Custom Soil Resource Report 21 Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS359MT) Hydric soil rating: No 509B—Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vp Elevation: 4,400 to 6,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Enbar and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Enbar Setting Landform: Flood plains Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 22 inches: loam Cg - 22 to 49 inches: sandy loam 2C - 49 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 10 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: C Custom Soil Resource Report 22 Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS359MT), Bottomland (R044BP801MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Nythar Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Flood plains Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Wet Meadow (WM) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS365MT) Hydric soil rating: Yes Straw Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vt Elevation: 4,200 to 5,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Meadowcreek and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Meadowcreek Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 11 inches: loam Bg - 11 to 25 inches: silt loam 2C - 25 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Custom Soil Resource Report 23 Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS359MT), Subirrigated Grassland (R044BP815MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Blossberg Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Wet Meadow (WM) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS365MT) Hydric soil rating: Yes Beaverton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces, alluvial fans Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT) Hydric soil rating: No 537A—Lamoose silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56wp Elevation: 4,000 to 5,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Lamoose and similar soils: 85 percent Custom Soil Resource Report 24 Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Lamoose Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 9 inches: silt loam Bg - 9 to 27 inches: silt loam 2C - 27 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 3.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Ecological site: Wet Meadow (WM) 9-14" p.z. (R044XS349MT), Subirrigated Grassland (R044BP815MT) Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Bonebasin Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Wet Meadow (WM) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS365MT) Hydric soil rating: Yes Meadowcreek Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 9-14" p.z. (R044XS343MT) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 25 Custom Soil Resource Report 26 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 27 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 28