Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
019 Wetlands Gallatin Park Lot 12
POWER ENGINEERS, INC. 5 WEST MENDENHALL BOZEMAN, MT 59715 USA PHONE 406-600-2286 BOI 199-1903 172963 (2021-08-16) BS August 16, 2021 Jeremy May, P.E. Headwaters Engineering, Inc. 190 Northstar Lane Bozeman, MT 59718 Subject: Gallatin Park Lot 12– Wetland/Waters Investigation Jeremy: At the request of Headwaters Engineering, Inc., a Professional Wetland Scientist with POWER Engineers, Inc. (POWER) examined an approximately 2-acre site (Property) on August 13, 2021, for the presence and extent of wetlands and waterways. The Property includes Lot 12, Block 2 of the Gallatin Park Subdivision located in the southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 5 East along Gallatin Park Drive off Manley Road in Bozeman, Montana (Figure 1). The Property is currently undeveloped land bordered by commercial development to the south, Frontage Road to the west, and designated open space to the north and east (Figure 2). Prior to the site visit, available data were reviewed pertaining to the potential presence of wetlands and/or waterways within the Property. The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey Geographic database identified one mapped soil series within the Property (Figure 3) and include Turner loam. Although indicated as moderately wet, this soil series is not classified as hydric by NRCS. Review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory database identified one palustrine, emergent, persistent, temporarily flooded wetland (PEM1A) mapped along the western boundary of the Property (Figure 4). This area was determined to be upland during the field investigation as no wetland criteria for hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, or wetland hydrology were identified in the area that corresponded with the NWI-mapped wetland. There were no waterways mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey National Hydrography Dataset within the Property. During the site visit, the Routine Level 2 Determination Method as outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual and subsequent methodologies outlined in the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) were followed. An area is defined as wetland according to the USACE based on the presence of positive indicators for hydrophytic (wetland) vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology. One sample point (SP1) was established along the eastern boundary of the Property in an area dominated by hydrophytic vegetation (reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinacea). Although this sample point qualified as hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology were not present. Aside from this narrow strip of hydrophytic vegetation located along the eastern boundary, the remainder of the site is dominated by plant species typically found in upland areas and includes smooth brome (Bromus inermis), common Timothy (Phleum pratense), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratenis). Representative photographs Jeremy May, P.E. Headwaters Engineering, Inc. August 16, 2021 BOI 199-1903 172963 (2021-08-16) BS PAGE 2 OF 2 of the Property and sampling point, and the completed USACE wetland determination data sheet have been provided with this letter. Based on our on-site and off-site evaluation of the approximate 2-acre Property, POWER has concluded there are no wetlands or waters of the U.S. present within the site. If you have any questions regarding the information being provided, please contact me at (406) 600-2286. Sincerely, Brian Sandefur Professional Wetland Scientist View west looking across Lot 12. View south looking along eastern boundary of Lot 12. View south of SP1. 2S 5E 1S 6E 2S 6E 1S 5E GALLATIN Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed MONTANAGallatin County Project Location 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Gallatin Park Lot 12 Figure 1:Topographic/Vicinity Map Legend Gallatin Park Lot 12 PLSS Township PLSS Section Ü Project Location MONTANAGallatin County Project Location 0 150 30075 Feet Gallatin Park Lot 12 Figure 2:2019 NAIP Aerial Imagery Map Legend Gallatin Park Lot 12 Ü 450C 457A 537A509B 556A MONTANAGallatin County Project Location 0 150 30075 Feet Gallatin Park Lot 12 Figure 3:NRCS Soils Map Legend Gallatin Park Lot 12 Series 450C - Blackdog-Quagle silt loams, 4-8% slopes 457A - Turner loam, moderately wet, 0-2% slopes 509B - Enbar loam, 0-4% slopes 537A - Lamoose silt loam, 0-2% slopes 556A - Threeriv-Bonebasin loams, 0-2% slopes Ü !. SP1 PABFx PEM1A PEM1A PEM1A PEM1C R4SBC R4SBC R4SBC 0 150 30075 Feet Gallatin Park Lot 12 Figure 4:NWI/NHD Map Legend Gallatin Park Lot 12 !.Sample PointNHDFlowlineFCode Intermittent Stream/River NWI Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Pond Riverine Ü State: Lat: Long: Datum: Yes X No ,Soil Yes No ,Soil Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No ) 1. 2. 3. 4. ) 1. 2. 3.x 1 = 4.x 2 = 5.x 3 = x 4 = )x 5 = 1.(A) 2. 3. 4. 5.X 6.X 7.X 8. 9. 10. 11. ) 1. 2. No 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Remarks: A positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed (Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation). 30 ft. None Observed Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: X 100 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes Are Vegetation ,or Hydrology ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Project/Site: City/County: Bozeman, Gallatin Co. Applicant/Owner: Investigator(s): Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): MT Sampling Date: 08/12/2021 Sampling Point: Gallatin Park Lot 12 Brian Sandefur, PWS Soil Map Unit Name: WGS84 Sec. 36, T1S, R5E = Total Cover 65 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: Remarks: The NWPL 2018 wetland ratings were used. XHydric Soil Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? SP1 Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?X No Non-WetlandTurner loam, moderately wet, 0-2% slopes NWI classification: Section, Township, Range: Subregion (LRR): LRR E SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) (If no, explain in Remarks.) 45.707705 This point was determined not to be within a wetland due to the lack of hydric soils and wetland hydrology. Tree Stratum (Plot size: VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Indicator Status 1 (B) None Observed = Total Cover FAC species FACNo 15 ft. Total % Cover of: Dominance Test worksheet:Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? (A/B) (A)1 Multiply by: None Observed 30 ft. 0 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25 10 75 100.00% 65 130 0OBL species FACW species 40 0 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? X No NoAre Vegetation No -111.044650 Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-1 X No No Valley bottom X = Total Cover Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - Version 2.0US Army Corps of Engineers 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 No FACU10Dactylis glomerata 10Poa pratensis FACNo 2.45 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 0 Cirsium arvense FACU species UPL species No Phalaris arundinacea Yes 5 ft. = Total Cover Column Totals: Prevalence Index = B/A = 100 Phleum pratense 5 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum (B)FACW FAC WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Prevalence Index worksheet: 245 A positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed (>50% of dominant species indexed as OBL, FACW, or FAC). A positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed (Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0). %% 2/1 100 3/2 100 — 6/2 100 — Yes No X Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: SP1Sampling Point: — 10YR 6-12 SOIL — 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) High Water Table (A2) X Depth (inches): Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Iron Deposits (B5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) X Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Type: Depth(inches): Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2 4A, and 4B) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) Surface Water (A1) HYDROLOGY Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) X Depth (inches): Remarks: X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Field Observations: (includes capillary fringe) Drainage Patterns (B10) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2 cm Muck (A10) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Redox Depressions (F8) Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Hydric Soil Present? US Army Corps of Engineers No positive indication of hydric soils was observed. Saturation Present? Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? No positive indication of wetland hydrology was observed. Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Salt Crust (B11) Remarks: 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. None Type1 Texture Remarks 10YR Depth (inches) None None Redox Features Silty Clay Silty Clay Loam — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - Version 2.0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Depleted Matrix (F3) 10YR Silty Clay Color (moist) 0-6 — Color (moist) Loc 2 — —12-18 Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)