Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-18-22 CDB Agenda and Packet MaterialsA.Call to Order - 6:00 pm B.Disclosures C.Changes to the Agenda D.Approval of Minutes D.1 Approval of Minutes from 5/16 and 6/06 (Happel) E.Public Comments This is the time to comment on any matter falling within the scope of the Community Development Board. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public comment relating to that item but you may only speak once. Please note, the Community Development Board cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All persons addressing the Community Development Board shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the audience shall be respectful of others. Please state your name and place of residence in an audible tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA CD AGENDA Monday, July 18, 2022 This meeting will be held both in-person and also using Webex, an online videoconferencing system. You can join this meeting: Via Webex: Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit. Click Join Now to enter the meeting. Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream, channel 190, or attend in-person United States Toll +1-650-479-3208 Access code: 2559 417 0774 If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda please send an email to agenda@bozeman.net prior to 12:00pm on the day of the meeting. Public comments will be accepted in-person during the appropriate agenda items. You may also comment by visiting the Commission's comment page. You can also comment by joining the Webex meeting. If you do join the Webex meeting, we ask you please be patient in helping us work through this hybrid meeting. As always, the meeting will be streamed through the Commission's video page and available in the City on cable channel 190. 1 minutes. General public comments to the Board can be found in their Laserfiche repository folder. F.Action Items F.1 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation of 1.0875 acres and amendment of the City Zoning Map for the establishment of a zoning designation of R-3 (Residential Medium Density).(Rogers) F.2 1001 Thomas Drive Annexation Requesting Annexation of 15.115 Acres and Zone Map Amendment of the City Zoning Map for the Establishment of a Zoning Designation of REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use) Application 22067(Saunders) F.3 6730 Davis Lane Annexation Requesting Annexation of 10.071 Acres and Amendment of the City Zoning Map for the Establishment of a Zoning Designation of REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed-Use District) Application 22020(Saunders) F.4 Recommendation of approval for a site plan for construction of a multi-household condominium development including 8 buildings, with three (3) mixed use buildings, one (1) commercial building, and four (4) three-unit buildings. Required parking, stormwater management, landscaping, and other improvements are included.(Hyde) G.FYI/Discussions G.1 Calendar Year 2021 Land Use Inventory (Saunders) G.2 Upcoming Items Expected for August 1, 2022 Community Development Board Meeting.(Saunders) H.Adjournment For more information please contact Anna Bentley, abentley@bozeman.net General information about the Community Development Board is available in our Laserfiche repository. This board generally meets the first and third Monday of the month from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm. Citizen Advisory Board meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and require assistance, please contact our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray at 406-582-3232 (TDD 406-582- 2301). In order for the City Commission to receive all relevant public comment in time for this City Commission meeting, please submit via the Commission Comment Page or by emailing agenda@bozeman.net no later than 12:00 PM on the day of the meeting. Public comment may be made in person at the meeting as well. 2 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Jon Fuller - Community Development Technician III Claire Morrison - Planner I Anna Bentley - Interim Director SUBJECT:Approval of Minutes from 5/16 and 6/06 MEETING DATE:July 18, 2022 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Minutes RECOMMENDATION:I move to approve the combined minutes as submitted. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.2 Community Engagement: Broaden and deepen engagement of the community in city government, innovating methods for inviting input from the community and stakeholders. BACKGROUND:None UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As determined by board. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: CD Board Meeting Minutes 05-16-22.pdf CD Board Meeting Minutes 06-06-22.pdf Report compiled on: July 14, 2022 3 Community Development Meeting Minutes, 05-16-2022 Page 1 of 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA MINUTES 05-16-2022 Present: Gerald Pape, Allison Bryan, Brady Ernst, Nicole Olmstead, Henry Happel, John Backes, Stephen Egnatz, Jennifer Madgic Absent: None A) 00:03:21 Call to Order - 6:00 pm Meeting started on time. B) 00:04:18 Disclosures There were no disclosures. C) 00:04:27 Changes to the Agenda One change to the agenda instated by Anna Bentley, Action Item F1 transferred to the next Community Development board meeting on June 6th. 00:04:49 Motion C) Continuance Motion: "I move to continue the hearing for application 21-442 to Monday, June 6th, 2022." (Pape) Gerald Pape: Motion Jennifer Madgic: 2nd Present: Gerald Pape, Allison Bryan, Brady Ernst, Henry Happel, John Backes, Padden Guy Murphy, Stephen Egnatz, Jennifer Madgic Absent: Nicole Olmstead D) 00:06:35 Approval of Minutes D.1 00:08:18 Approve the Meeting Minutes from May 2, 2022 CD Board Meeting Minutes 050222.pdf 00:06:57 Motion the meeting minutes as submitted. 4 Community Development Meeting Minutes, 05-16-2022 Page 2 of 6 Stephen Egnatz: Motion Jennifer Madgic: 2nd 00:07:14 Vote on the Motion to approve the meeting minutes as submitted.. The Motion carried 7 - 0 Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: None Present: Gerald Pape, Allison Bryan, Brady Ernst, Henry Happel, John Backes, Padden Guy Murphy, Stephen Egnatz, Jennifer Madgic Absent: Nicole Olmstead E) 00:08:26 Public Comments 00:08:47 No Public Commentors F) 00:10:29 Action Items F.1 00:10:46 Annexation and initial zoning application 21443 requesting annexation of 8.56 acres and amendment to the City Zoning Map for the establishment of a zoning designation of B-2M (Community Business-Mixed District). 6590 Davis Lane Annexation Request.pdf 00:04:57 Motion I move to continue the hearing for application 21443 to Monday, June 6, 2022. Gerald Pape: Motion Jennifer Madgic: 2nd 00:05:37 Vote on the Motion to postpone I move to continue the hearing for application 21443 to Monday, June 6, 2022.. The Motion carried 7 - 0 Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic 5 Community Development Meeting Minutes, 05-16-2022 Page 3 of 6 Disapprove: None Present: Gerald Pape, Allison Bryan, Brady Ernst, Henry Happel, John Backes, Padden Guy Murphy, Stephen Egnatz, Jennifer Madgic Absent: Nicole Olmstead F.2 00:10:43 Ordinance 2108, Well Use Requirement Update the City of Bozeman (City) regulations for review of subdivisions to conform to the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, recently updated by the State Legislature, Application 22137. 22137 CDB Staff Report Final.pdf Ordinance 2108_Irrigation Water Supply for Review.pdf 01:12:27 Motion Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22137 and move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2108. Nicole Olmstead: Motion Brady Ernst: 2nd 01:20:49 Vote on the Motion to free form Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22137 and move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2108.. The Motion carried 7 - 1 Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: Nicole Olmstead 00:11:09 Tom Rogers introduced Brian Heaston who presented on Ordinance 2108. F.3 01:22:56 Ordinance 2111, Departures for Housing Creation, Consider and Recommend to City Commission a New Section 38.320.070 to Authorize Additional Administrative Flexibility In Administration of Specified Residential Standards and Create Definitions for Infill and Missing Middle Housing, Application 22133. 22133 CDB Staff Report - Departures.pdf Ordinance 2111 Departures (DRAFT).pdf 22133 Departures amendments - e-news.pdf 02:30:36 Motion Community Development Board Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby 6 Community Development Meeting Minutes, 05-16-2022 Page 4 of 6 adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22133 and move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2111. Allison Bryan: Motion John Backes: 2nd 02:31:20 Motion Mark Egge Comment Amendment to motion. His suggestion is ADUs may be permitted on any lot in a district where ADUs are allowed use that meets the lot size and setback requirements for the principal structure except for lots under 3000 square feet in area or lots containing attached town homes without the requirement for 1000 square feet of additional area. His suggestion includes the inclusion of "and" Jennifer Madgic: Motion Gerald Pape: 2nd 02:33:35 Vote on the Motion to amend Mark Egge Comment Amendment to motion. His suggestion is ADUs may be permitted on any lot in a district where ADUs are allowed use that meets the lot size and setback requirements for the principal structure except for lots under 3000 square feet in area or lots containing attached town homes without the requirement for 1000 square feet of additional area. His suggestion includes the inclusion of "and". The Motion carried 8 - 0 Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Nicole Olmstead Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: None 02:35:13 Motion Criteria 3 Nicole Olmstead: Motion Henry Happel: 2nd 02:41:45 Vote on the Motion to amend Criteria 3. The Motion failed 1 - 7 Approve: Nicole Olmstead Disapprove: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst 7 Community Development Meeting Minutes, 05-16-2022 Page 5 of 6 Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic 02:44:44 Motion Deletion of Criteria 3 Henry Happel: Motion Jennifer Madgic: 2nd 02:51:03 Vote on the Motion to amend Deletion of Criteria 3. The Motion carried 7 - 1 Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Nicole Olmstead Henry Happel John Backes Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: Stephen Egnatz 02:55:04 Vote on the Motion to free form Community Development Board Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22133 and move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2111.. The Motion carried 7 - 1 Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Nicole Olmstead Henry Happel Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: John Backes G) 02:55:55 FYI/Discussions G.1 Upcoming Items for June 6, 2022 Community Development Board meeting. G.2 02:57:07 Community development report ComDev Report March 2022.pdf H) 02:57:55 Adjournment 8 Community Development Meeting Minutes, 05-16-2022 Page 6 of 6 Meeting Adjourned For more information please contact Anna Bentley, abentley@bozeman.net General information about the Community Development Board is available in our Laserfiche repository. 9 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, [DATE] Page 1 of 7 THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA MINUTES Monday, June 6, 2022 A) 00:02:50 Call to Order - 6:00 pm Present: Allison Bryan, Brady Ernst, Nicole Olmstead, Henry Happel, John Backes, Stephen Egnatz, Jennifer Madgic Absent: Gerald Pape, Padden Guy Murphy B) 00:03:32 Disclosures None. C) 00:03:38 Changes to the Agenda 00:03:47 One change to the agenda suggested by Anna Bentley, Action Item H.3 continued to the Community Development Board meeting on June 27th. The suggestion was supported and the item is continued to Monday, June 6th. D) Approval of Minutes E) 00:10:24 Consent Items E.1 Recommendation of approval for a site plan for construction of a multi-household condominium development including 13 buildings with five 3-unit buildings and eight 4- unit buildings. Required parking, stormwater management, landscaping, etc. are all included. 21479 Autumn Grove Condominium Community Dev Board SR.pdf 000 Site Plan Cover Letter.pdf 003 Form A1 Development Review.pdf 007 Autumn Grove Arch Narrative Departure Request Letter 11-21-21.pdf 015 Plat J-494.pdf 016 Site Plan Project Narrative.pdf 002 C0.1 CMP & Phasing.pdf 003 C1.0 Site Plan.pdf 10 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, [DATE] Page 2 of 7 001 C0.0 Cover.pdf 010 A00.1 - CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS.pdf 011 A00.2 - MATERIALS BOARD.pdf 009 A00.0 - COVER.pdf 103 L101 - Overall Landscape Plan - Autumn Grove Condominiums_21-12-06.pdf 107 L201 - Landscape Details - Autumn Grove Condominiums_21-12-06.pdf 108 Site Lighting.pdf 109 Photometrics.pdf 018 A01.6 BLDG 1 - TYPE 3-C - ELEVATIONS.pdf 025 A02.6 BLDG 2 - TYPE 4-A - ELEVATIONS.pdf 032 A03.6 BLDG 3 - TYPE 3-A - ELEVATIONS.pdf 039 A04.6 BLDG 4 - TYPE 4-B - ELEVATIONS.pdf 046 A05.6 BLDG 5 - TYPE 4-C - ELEVATIONS.pdf 053 A06.6 BLDG 6 - TYPE 4-C - ELEVATIONS.pdf 060 A07.6 BLDG 7 - TYPE 4-C - ELEVATIONS.pdf 067 A08.6 BLDG 8 - TYPE 4-A - ELEVATIONS.pdf 074 A09.6 BLDG 9 - TYPE 3-A - ELEVATIONS.pdf 081 A10.6 BLDG 10 - TYPE 4-B - ELEVATIONS.pdf 088 A11.6 BLDG 11 - TYPE 3-B - ELEVATIONS.pdf 095 A12.6 BLDG 12 - TYPE 3-D - ELEVATIONS.pdf 102 A13.6 BLDG 13 - TYPE 4-D - ELEVATIONS.pdf 00:05:12 Staff Presentation: Planner Lynn Hyde provided a brief overview on the reason for the project's classification as a consent item and responded to public comments. 00:05:12 Board member Pape joined the meeting. Present: Gerald Pape, Allison Bryan, Brady Ernst, Nicole Olmstead, Henry Happel, John Backes, Stephen Egnatz, Jennifer Madgic Absent: Padden Guy Murphy 00:17:21 Public Comment: Joel Rudy, 1811 Springview Court, offered public comment and expressed concerns regarding the application. Mindy Grove, 3017 Tschache Lane, offered public comment and expressed concerns regarding the application. 00:23:00 Board member Egnatz requested that consent item E1 be moved to the action agenda for further consideration. G) Special Presentations F) 01:20:20 Public Comments H) Action Items 11 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, [DATE] Page 3 of 7 00:23:14 Recommendation of approval for a site plan for construction of a multi- household condominium development including 13 buildings with five 3-unit buildings and eight 4-unit buildings. Required parking, stormwater management, landscaping, etc are all included. 00:29:05 Board Questions: The board posed questions to staff. 00:32:14 Staff Presentation: Planner Lynn Hyde presented additional information. 00:41:44 Board Questions: The board posed additional questions to staff regarding application 21479. 00:54:31 Applicant Presentation: Eric of Madison Engineering presented on behalf of the developer and emphasized parking and parkland. 00:56:49 Board Questions: The board posed questions to the representatives. Dean Burges, a representative of the developer, provided a brief secondary applicant presentation and answered questions posed by the board related to architecture. 01:09:27 Motion Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for site plan application 21479 for the Autumn Grove Condominium and move to recommend approval of the site plan, subject to recommended conditions and all applicable code provisions. Stephen Egnatz: Motion Gerald Pape: 2nd 01:19:25 Vote on the Motion to approve Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for site plan application 21479 for the Autumn Grove Condominium and move to recommend approval of the site plan, subject to recommended conditions and all applicable code provisions. The Motion carried 8 – 0. Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Nicole Olmstead Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: None H.1 01:25:29 Recommendation of approval for a site plan for new construction of a 65-unit combination single-detached household and rowhouse rental residential development on 4-acres consisting of two blocks within the Blackwood Groves 12 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, [DATE] Page 4 of 7 Subdivision, Phase 1 located at the southeast corner of S. 19th Ave. and Cambridge Drive. 01:26:14 Staff presentation: Planner Susana Montana presented application 21421. 002_A0-30 Architectural Site Plan.pdf V2.pdf 001_CS Cover Sheet.pdf V2.pdf 001_Project Narrative.pdf V2.pdf 21421 Blackwood Groves cottages site plan CDB cover sheet.docx Attachment 2 for 21421 Cottages_Master Parkland Tracking Table.pdf Overall Landscape Plan.pdf 021_A1.00 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 1.pdf 022_A1.01 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 1.pdf 023_A1.02 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 1.pdf 024_A2.00 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 2.pdf 025_A2.01 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 2.pdf 026_A2.02 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 2.pdf 027_A2.03 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 2.pdf 028_A2.04 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 2.pdf 029_A3.00 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 3.pdf 030_A3.01 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 3.pdf 031_A3.02 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 3.pdf 032_A3.03 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 3.pdf 033_A3.04 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 3.pdf 034_A3.05 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 3.pdf 035_A4.00 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4.pdf 036_A4.01 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4 Alt.pdf 037_A4.02 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4.pdf 038_A4.03 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4 Alt.pdf 039_A4.04 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4.pdf 040_A4.05 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4.pdf 041_A4.06 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4 Alt.pdf 042_A4.07 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4 Alt.pdf 043_A4.08 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4.pdf 044_A4.09 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4.pdf 045_A4.10 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 4 Alt.pdf 046_A5.00 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 5.pdf 047_A5.01 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 5.pdf 048_A5.02 Floor Plans and Elevations_Type 5.pdf 21421 Blackwood Groves cottages SP CDB staff rpt.pdf 02:15:41 Motion Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 21421 for the Blackwood Groves Cottages and move to recommend approval of the site plan, subject to recommended conditions and all applicable code provisions. Brady Ernst: Motion Allison Bryan: 2nd 13 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, [DATE] Page 5 of 7 02:23:01 Vote on the Motion to approve Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 21421 for the Blackwood Groves Cottages and move to recommend approval of the site plan, subject to recommended conditions and all applicable code provisions. The Motion carried 8 – 0. Approve: Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Nicole Olmstead Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: None 01:39:34 Board questions: The board posed questions to staff. 01:50:26 Applicant Presentation: Grant Sipe and Rob Pertzborn presented on behalf of the developer. 01:58:46 Board Questions: The board posed questions to the representatives. 02:14:24 Staff Response: Planner Susana Montana provided a response to the representatives' presentation. H.2 02:24:06 Annexation and initial zoning application 21443 requesting annexation of 8.56 acres and amendment to the City Zoning Map for the establishment of a zoning designation of B-2M (Community Business-Mixed District). 21443 Davis Lane Prop Annx-ZMA ZC SR.pdf 02:50:04 Motion Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 21433 and move to recommend approval of the 6590 Davis Lane Annexation Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Jennifer Madgic: Motion John Backes: 2nd 02:57:14 Vote on the Motion to approve Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 21433 and move to recommend approval of the 6590 Davis Lane Annexation Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. The Motion carried 8 – 0. Approve: 14 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, [DATE] Page 6 of 7 Gerald Pape Allison Bryan Brady Ernst Nicole Olmstead Henry Happel John Backes Stephen Egnatz Jennifer Madgic Disapprove: None 02:24:35 Staff Presentation: Planner Tom Rogers presented on the proposed annexation and initial zoning. 02:30:52 Board Questions: The board posed questions to staff. 02:39:07 Applicant Presentation: Matt Four presented on behalf of the applicant and provided additional context for the site. 02:43:39 Board Questions: The board posed questions to the representative. I) 02:58:03 FYI/Discussions I.1 02:58:28 Upcoming Items for June 27, 2022 Community Development Board meeting. I.2 02:59:41 Advisory Board Rules and Procedures. CDB June 6 FYI item_Rules and Procedures_cover sheet.pdf Interim Director of Community Development Anna Bentley informed the board of items to be presented at the June 27th meeting and highlighted rules and procedures that apply to all advisory boards with an emphasis on attendance. Board members discussed attendance and meeting format. J) 03:07:36 Adjournment For more information please contact Anna Bentley, abentley@bozeman.net General information about the Community Development Board is available in our Laserfiche repository. 15 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, [DATE] Page 7 of 7 16 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Anna Bentley, Interim Director of Community Development SUBJECT:130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation of 1.0875 acres and amendment of the City Zoning Map for the establishment of a zoning designation of R-3 (Residential Medium Density). MEETING DATE:July 18, 2022 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22043 and move to recommend approval of the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.1 Informed Conversation on Growth: Continue developing an in-depth understanding of how Bozeman is growing and changing and proactively address change in a balanced and coordinated manner. BACKGROUND:The applicants and property owners, Little Spanish Preschool, seek to annex 1.0875 acre parcel into the City limits and establish initial zoning of R-3, Residential Medium Density. The property is currently zoned SRR, Semi- Rural Residential, in Zoning District 1 (County Zoning) and hosts a single- household structure. Nearby municipal zoning includes R-2, Residential Mo0derate Density, R-3, Residential Medium Density, and PLI, Public Lands and Institutions. The Future land Use designation is Urban Neighborhood. The R-3 zoning district is an implementing zoning district for the category, The adjacent Flanders Mill Road rights-of-way will be annexed with this application. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:There are no identified conflicts on this application at this time. ALTERNATIVES:1. Approve the application and associated resolution and ordinance; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended zoning; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non- compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific 17 direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS:No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Annexation or Zone Map Amendment. Future development will incur costs and generate review according to standard City practices. Attachments: 22043 Flanders Mill ZMA CDB SR.pdf Report compiled on: July 1, 2022 18 Page 1 of 31 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Public Hearings: Community Development Board (map amendment only) July 18, 2022 City Commission (Annexation and map amendment) July 26, 2022 Project Description: Annexation of 1.0875 acres and amendment of the City Zoning Map for the establishment of a zoning designation of R-3 (Residential Medium Density). Project Location: 130 Flanders Mill Road and more accurately described as Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey 2360 located in the Southwest ¼ of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Meets standards for approval with terms and contingencies. Recommended Zoning Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22043 and move to recommend approval of the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Recommended City Commission Annexation Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22043 and move to approve Resolution 5425, the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation. Recommended City Commission Zoning Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, recommendation of the Zoning Commission, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 22043 and move to provisionally adopt Ordinance 2119, the 130 Flanders Mill Road Zone Map Amendment. Report: July 1, 2022 Staff Contact: Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Alicia Paz-Solis, Engineer I Agenda Item Type: Action – Legislative EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is based on the application materials submitted and public comment received to date. This report addresses both the zoning amendment for Community Development Board 19 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 2 of 31 acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission as well as the annexation and the zoning amendment for the City Commission. Application materials available at https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?startid=260436&cr=1 Unresolved Issues There are no identified conflicts on this application at this time. Project Summary The applicants and property owners, Little Spanish Preschool, seek to annex 1.0875 acre parcel into the City limits and establish initial zoning of R-3, Residential Medium Density. The property is currently zoned SRR, Semi-Rural Residential, in Zoning District 1 (County Zoning) and hosts a single-household structure. Nearby municipal zoning includes R-2, Residential Mo0derate Density, R-3, Residential Medium Density, and PLI, Public Lands and Institutions. The Future land Use designation is Urban Neighborhood. The R-3 zoning district is an implementing zoning district for the category, The adjacent Flanders Mill Road rights-of-way will be annexed with this application. The following public adopted planning documents support urban development for the subject area if development is proposed on the site:  Bozeman Community Plan 2020  Gallatin County growth policy  Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Plan – County neighborhood plan  Transportation Master Plan 2017 – City transportation plan  Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Master Plan 2007 – Gallatin County Transportation Plan  Water Facility Plan 2017 – City’s plan for water system operations and expansion  Wastewater Facility Plan 2015 – City’s plan for wastewater system operations and expansion Community Development Board (Zoning Commission) Summary The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on July 18, 2022. In an effort to expedite the review of this application a truncated review schedule was established. A summary of the CDB will be provided at the City Commission meeting. All public meeting videos can be viewed at the following link: https://www.bozeman.net/departments/city-commission/commission-meeting-video 20 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 3 of 31 Alternatives 1. Approve the application and associated resolution and ordinance; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended zoning; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 21 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 4 of 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 2 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 Community Development Board (Zoning Commission) Summary ................................... 2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED TERMS OF ANNEXATION ............................................ 8 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT... 11 SECTION 4 – ADVISORY COMMENTS ............................................................................ 11 SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ...................................... 12 Annexation ........................................................................................................................ 12 Zone Map Amendment ..................................................................................................... 12 SECTION 6 - ANNEXATION STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ................................ 12 SECTION 7 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ........... 18 Spot Zoning Criteria ......................................................................................................... 27 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ......................................................... 29 APPENDIX A - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT .................................................... 29 APPENDIX B - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING ................... 29 APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF ............................ 31 FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 31 ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... 31 22 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 5 of 31 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES Project Vicinity Map (2021 air photo) 23 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 6 of 31 Project Vicinity Map Showing the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 Future Land Use Map – Subject property is designated as Urban Neighborhood Urban Neighborhood Public Institutions Parks & Open Lands 24 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 7 of 31 Project Vicinity Map Showing Near Vicinity Municipal Zoning R-3 PL R-2 R-4 R-1 25 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 8 of 31 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED TERMS OF ANNEXATION The following terms of annexation are recommended to enable the application to comply with the City’s Annexation Policy and the requirements of state law for the provision of services. Recommended terms of annexation: 1. The documents and exhibits to formally annex the subject property must be identified as the “130 Flanders Mill Annexation”. 2. An Annexation Map, titled “130 Flanders Mill Annexation Map” with a legal description of the property and any adjoining un-annexed rights-of-way and/or street access easements must be submitted by the applicant for use with the Annexation Agreement. The map must be supplied as a PDF for filing with the Annexation Agreement at the County Clerk & Recorder, and a digital copy for the City Engineer’s Office. This map must be acceptable to the Director of Public Works and City Engineer’s Office, and must be submitted with the signed Annexation Agreement. 3. The applicant must execute all contingencies and terms of said Annexation Agreement with the City of Bozeman within 60 days of the distribution of the annexation agreement from the City to the applicant or annexation approval shall be null and void. 4. The land owners and their successors must pay all fire, street, water and sewer impact fees at the time of connection; and for future development, as required by Chapter 2, Bozeman Municipal Code, or as amended at the time of application for any permit listed therein. 5. The Annexation Agreement must include notice that the applicant must connect to municipal services and will be responsible for installing any facilities required to provide full municipal services to the property in accordance with city policy at the time of connection. 6. The applicant must properly abandon the existing on-site septic tank and leach field prior to connection to the City sanitary sewer system. The applicant must report the abandonment to the City Water and Sewer Superintendent (Nick Pericich) for inspection, and the applicant must report the abandonment to the Gallatin City County Health Department. In addition to abandonment of the septic tank and leach field, the applicant must demonstrate that the sanitary sewer service to the septic tank has been completely disconnected from the old septic system prior to connection to the City sanitary sewer system. 7. The applicant must completely disconnect the on-site well from the house prior to connection to the City water system to protect the City’s system from cross contamination. The applicant must contact the City Water and Sewer Superintendent to inspect the disconnect prior to connection of water service from the house to the City water system. 8. The applicant must contact the City Engineering Department to obtain an analysis of cash- in-lieu of water rights for the proposed annexation. The determined amount must be paid prior to annexation. 26 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 9 of 31 9. Notice Term Header. The Annexation Agreement must include the following notices: Notice Term "a" Storm Water Master Plan. The Annexation Agreement must include notice that, prior to development, the applicant will be responsible for preparing a storm water master plan in conjunction with future development. The storm water master plan shall address maintenance and operations until and unless the City affirmatively assumes responsibility for maintenance and operations of stormwater facilities within the area of the annexation. Notice Term "b" Extent of Service. The Annexation Agreement must include notice the City will, upon annexation, make available to the Property existing City services only to the extent currently available, or as provided in the Agreement. Notice Term "c" Water Rights. The Annexation Agreement must include notice that, prior to future final development approval, the applicant will be responsible for transfer of water rights or a payment in lieu as required by the Bozeman Municipal Code Notice Term "d" Verification of Municipal Service. The Annexation Agreement must include notice that there is no right, either granted or implied, for Landowner to further develop any of the Property until it is verified by the City that the necessary municipal services are available to the property. Notice Term "e" Municipal Service Installation. The Annexation Agreement must include notice that, prior to development, the applicant will be responsible for installing any facilities required to provide full municipal services to the properties in accordance with the City of Bozeman's infrastructure master plans and all City policies that may be in effect at the time of development. Notice Term "f" Utility Easements. The Annexation Agreement must include notice that utility easements may be required to be provided by the landowner at the time of development to ensure necessary municipal services are available to the property. Notice Term "assessments. The agreement must include notice that charges and assessments may be required after completion of annexation to ensure necessary municipal services are available to the property. Notice Term "h" Impact Fees. The Annexation Agreement must include notice that the City will assess system development and impact fees in accordance with Montana law and Chapter 2, Article 6, Division 9, Bozeman Municipal Code. Notice Term "I" Impact Fees. All procedural terms necessary to establish the Annexation Agreement in conformance with state law and municipal practice will be included with the final Annexation Agreement. 10. ROW Term 1. {Flanders Mill Road is classified as a local street in the Bozeman Transportation Master Plan (TMP), which has a minimum right-of-way ROW width of 60 feet. The applicant must provide their respective Flanders Mill road ROW from the centerline of the existing ROW as a public street and utility easement where Flanders Mill Road is adjacent to the property. A 30 foot public street and utility easement must be provided prior to the adoption of Resolution of Annexation. The applicant can contact the City's Engineering Department to receive a copy of the standard easement language. 27 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 10 of 31 11. Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) 38.410.060.B.2. A ten (10) foot utility easement must be provided along the lot frontage prior to annexation. The executed easement must be delivered to the City Engineering Department. The easement must be executed on the City’s standard easement form. A copy of the standard easement form can be obtained from the City Engineering Department. 12. City of Bozeman Resolution 5076, Policy 1 - If not already filed for the subject site, the applicant will need to provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SIDs) for the following: (a) Street improvements to Durston Road between N Cottonwood Rd and N Ferguson Ave including paving curb/gutter, sidewalk, lighting and storm drainage; (b) Street improvements to Ferguson Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, lighting and storm drainage; (c) Flanders Mill Rd, between W Oak St and Durston Rd; (d) Intersection improvements at Durston Road and North Ferguson Avenue including lighting, signalization, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage; (e) Intersection improvements at Durston Road and Flanders Mill Road including lighting, signalization. Paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage; (f) Intersection improvements at West Oak Street and Flanders Mill Road including lighting, signalization, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage; (g) Intersection improvements at Ferguson Avenue and West Oak Street including lighting, signalization, paving, cub/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage. The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to Site Plan approval. Alternate Financing Term. The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of the improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the SID waiver in conjunction with the Annexation Agreement The applicant may obtain a copy of the template SID waiver from the City Engineering Department. The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the applicant agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the SID waiver filed with the County Clerk and Recorder prior to annexation 13. Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) 38.410.130. The applicant must contact Griffin Nielsen with the City Engineering Department to obtain an analysis of cash-in-lieu of water rights for the proposed annexation. The determined amount must be paid prior to annexation. 28 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 11 of 31 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the proposed amendment. These contingencies only apply in the event that the related annexation request has previously been approved. Recommended Contingencies of Approval: 1. The Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment must not be approved until the Annexation Agreement is signed by the applicant and formally approved by the City Commission. If the Annexation Agreement is not approved, the Zone Map Amendment application is null and void. 2. All documents and exhibits necessary to establish an initial municipal zoning designation must be identified as the “130 Flanders Mill Road Zone Map Amendment”. The map exhibit must be revised to state R-3 zoning designation. 3. The applicant must submit a zone amendment map, titled “130 Flanders Mill Road Zone Map Amendment”, as PDF and a digital copy of the area to be zoned, acceptable to the Director of Public Works, which will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of Bozeman Zoning Map. The map must contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject properties, zoning district, and total acreage of the property. 4. The Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant provides an editable metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor. SECTION 4 – ADVISORY COMMENTS 1. Future Impact Fees - Please note that future building permit applications will require payment of the required transportation, water, sewer and fire impact fees according to the City of Bozeman adopted impact fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance. If you desire an estimate of the required impact fees according to current rates please contact the Department of Community Development and/or visit www.bozeman.net. 2. Upon future development of the parcel, the transfer of water rights or the payment of cash- in-lieu (CIL) of water rights must be provided per Bozeman Municipal Code 38.410.130. 29 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 12 of 31 SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Annexation The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the annexation. The DRC did not make a formal recommendation and did not express concerns with annexation of the property. The City Commission will hold a public meeting on the annexation on July 26, 2022. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. in the Commission Room at City Hall, 121 N. Rouse Ave, Bozeman, Montana, the City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the proposed Annexation and Zone Map Amendment application. Members of the public will also be able to participate remotely via WebEx. Instructions for joining the WebEx meeting will be included on the meeting agenda which is published on the City’s website at least 48 hours prior to the meeting Zone Map Amendment Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, the Staff finds the application meets criteria for approval as submitted. The 130 Flanders Mill Road Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) is in conjunction with an annexation request. Staff’s recommendation and staff responses are predicated on approval of the annexation, application 22043. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the amendment. The DRC identified did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints that would impede the approval of the Zone Map Amendment application. The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on this ZMA on July 18, 2022 and will forward a recommendation to the City Commission on the Zone Map amendment. The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the zone map amendment on July 26, 2022. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. in the Commission Room at City Hall, 121 N. Rouse Ave, Bozeman, Montana, the City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the proposed Annexation and Zone Map Amendment application. Members of the public will also be able to participate remotely via WebEx. Instructions for joining the WebEx meeting will be included on the meeting agenda which is published on the City’s website at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. SECTION 6 - ANNEXATION STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for approval of the requested annexation, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: Commission Resolution No. 5076 Criteria 30 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 13 of 31 Commission Resolution No. 5076 Goals Goal 1: The City of Bozeman encourages annexations of land contiguous to the City. Criterion Met. The property in question is contiguous to the City limits. Goal 2: The City encourages all areas that are totally surrounded by the City to annex. Criterion met. The subject property is totally surrounded by City limits. Goal 3: The City encourages all properties currently contracting with the City for City services such as water, sanitary sewer, and/or fire protection to annex. Neutral. The subject property is not currently contracting for services. Goal 4: The City of Bozeman requires annexation of all land proposed for development lying within the existing and planned service area of the municipal water and sewer systems as depicted in their respective facility plans, any land proposed for development that proposes to utilize municipal water or sewer systems. Criterion Met. The subject property lies within the planned service area of the municipal water and sewer services. The existing residential structure and any proposed future developments will be required to utilize municipal water or sewer systems. Goal 5: The City encourages annexations within the urban area identified on the future land use map in the current Bozeman Growth Policy. Criterion Met. As shown in Section 1, the subject property is primarily planned as ‘Urban Neighborhood’ and is within the urban area of the growth policy. See the discussion under Criterion A of Section 6 of the report for more information on the growth policy. Goal 6: The City of Bozeman encourages annexations to make the City boundaries more regular rather than creating irregular extensions which leave unannexed gaps between annexed areas or islands of annexed or unannexed land. Criterion Met. The proposed annexation will fill an existing island of un-annexed property within City limits. Goal 7: The City of Bozeman encourages annexations which will enhance the existing traffic circulation system or provide for circulation systems that do not exist at the present time. Criterion Met. The subject property will provide the necessary right of way and utility easements for Flanders Mill Road. No addition internal street network is required to serve the property at this time. 31 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 14 of 31 Goal 8: The City prefers annexation of parcels of land larger than five (5) acres in size, but will allow annexation of smaller parcels if factors such as topographic limitations, sanitary disposal needs, fire access, maintenance of public facilities, etc., justify a smaller annexation. Neutral. The subject property is 1.0875 acres. Goal 9: The City seeks to obtain water rights adequate for future development of the property with annexation. Criterion Met. After annexation, the subject property will be bound to the provisions of 38.410.130 which require evaluation of water adequacy and provision of water if needed at time of development. The municipal code section requires water rights or an equivalent to be provided. Exact timing and amounts will be evaluated during development review. There are several methods to address the requirements of 38.410.130. The annexation agreement will provide notice of this requirement, see Terms of Annexation 5. The landowner will consent to this requirement by signature on the annexation agreement. Goal 10: The City of Bozeman encourages annexations for City provision of clean treated water and sanitary sewer. Criterion Met. The subject property is located within the City’s planned water and sewer service area. See Goal 4 above. There is an existing 18 inch sanitary sewer pipe in Flanders Mill Road. Water supply is installed in Sunstone Street to the north. Any future development will be required to connect to the City systems. Per Term of Annexation 5, the Annexation Agreement required to finalize the requested annexation will require the applicant to design extensions of services to meet the City’s adopted infrastructure standards. These include provisions for minimum water pressure and volumes, adequate sewer flows by volume, gravity flow of sewers, and other standards necessary to protect public health and safety and ensure functional utilities. Resolution No. 5076 Policies Policy 1: Annexations must include dedication of all easements for rights-of-way for collector and arterial streets, adjacent local streets, public water, sanitary sewer, or storm or sewer mains, and Class I public trails not within the right of way for arterial or collector streets. Annexations must also include waivers of right to protest the creation of special or improvement districts necessary to provide the essential services for future development of the City. Criterion Met. As discussed in Section 5 Goal 7, right of way is being included for Flanders Mill Road to the west. The Recommended Terms of Annexation include requirements for these right of way provisions. See Terms of Annexation 12. 32 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 15 of 31 Any additional easements and rights of way will be provided within the property with future development of the property as required by municipal standards. Exact locations will be determined by further technical analysis and site design. Policy 2: Issues pertaining to master planning and zoning must be addressed prior to or in conjunction with the application for annexation. Criterion Met. The subject property is planned for Urban Neighborhood. No additional changes to the growth policy is required. The application includes a request for initial zoning of R-3. See the zone map amendment section of this report for analysis of the zone map amendment criteria. Policy 3: The application for annexation must be in conformance with the current Bozeman Growth Policy. If a Growth Policy Amendment is necessary to accommodate anticipated uses, the amendment process must be initiated by the property owner and completed prior to any action for approval of the application for annexation. This policy is met. The property is designated “Urban Neighborhood” on the future land use map. As noted in Policy 3 above, the required growth policy amendment is complete and no further adjustments are needed. See discussion under zone map amendment Criterion A. Policy 4: Initial zoning classification of the property to be annexed will be determined by the City Commission, in compliance with the Bozeman Growth Policy and upon a recommendation of the City Zoning Commission, simultaneously with review of the annexation petition. The Community Development Board (CDB) acting in their capacity as the City Zoning Commission will be reviewing the requested zoning district designation on July 18, 2022. The CDB’s recommendation will be passed along to the City Commission for review and consideration along with the annexation request on July 26, 2022. Policy 5: The applicant must indicate their preferred zoning classification as part of the annexation petition. Criterion Met. The applicant has requested R-2, the Residential Moderate Density District. See Section 7 of this report for analysis of the requested zoning. Policy 6: Fees for annexation processing will be established by the City Commission. Criterion Met. The appropriate application processing and review fees accompanied the application. Policy 7: It is the policy of the City that annexations will not be approved where unpaved county roads will be the most commonly used route to gain access to the 33 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 16 of 31 property unless the landowner proposes a method to provide for construction of the road to the City’s street standards. Criterion Met. The subject property is accessed by Davis Lane which is a minor arterial and paved to the edge of the subject property. Policy 8: Prior to annexation of property, the City will require the property owner to acquire adequate and usable water rights, or an appropriate fee in lieu thereof, in accordance with Section 38.410.130 of the municipal code, as amended. Criterion Met. The property owner shall provide usable water rights, or cash in-lieu of water rights thereof, in an amount to be determined by the Director of Public Works, as outlined by Section 38.410.130 of the municipal code. The calculated amount will be determined by the Director of Public Works and based on the zoning designation approved by the City Commission. Term of Annexation No. 9 requires notice of this requirement to be part of the annexation agreement. Satisfaction of this requirement will occur with future development. Policy 9: Infrastructure and emergency services for an area proposed for annexation will be reviewed for the health, safety and welfare of the public and conformance with the City’s adopted facility plans. If the City determines adequate services cannot be provided to ensure public health, safety and welfare, the City may require the property owner to provide a written plan for accommodation of these services, or the City may reject the petition for annexation. Additionally, the parcel to be annexed may only be provided sanitary sewer service via the applicable drainage basin defined in the City Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan. Criterion Met. City infrastructure and emergency services are available to the subject property. There is an existing 18 inch sanitary sewer pipe in Flanders Mill Road. Water supply is installed with a 8 inch pipe in adjacent Sunstone Street. The property is located adjacent to existing urban development that is currently served by Bozeman Fire. Policy 10: The City may require annexation of any contiguous property for which city services are requested or for which city services are currently being provided. In addition, any person, firm, or corporation receiving water or sewer service outside of the City limits is required as a condition of initiating or continuing such service, to consent to annexation of the property serviced by the City. The City Manager may enter into an agreement with a property owner for connection to the City’s sanitary sewer or water system in an emergency conditioned upon the submittal by the property owner of a petition for annexation and filing of a notice of consent to annexation with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office. The contract for connection to city sewer and/or water must require the property owner to annex or consent to disconnection of the services. Connection for purposes of obtaining City sewer services in an emergency requires, when feasible as determined by the City, the connection to City water services. 34 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 17 of 31 Criterion Met. The property is not currently provided City services. No emergency connection is requested. City services will be required to be provided concurrent with future development. Terms of Annexation 5 address connection to services. Policy 11: The annexation application shall be accompanied by mapping to meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works. Where an area to be annexed can be entirely described by reference to a certificate of survey or subdivision plat on file with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder the mapping may be waived by the Director of Public Works. Criterion Met. Mapping to meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works must be provided with the Annexation Agreement. Mapping requirements are addressed in Recommended Term of Annexation 2. The map must include adjacent right of way. Policy 12: The City will assess system development/impact fees in accordance with Montana law and Chapter 2, Article 6, Division 9, Bozeman Municipal Code. Neutral. The annexation does not require immediate payment of fees for additional development. The annexation agreement will provide notice of obligations to pay impact fees at times of triggers as required in ordinance. Policy 13: Public notice requirements: Notice for annexation of property must be coordinated with the required notice for the zone map amendment required with all annexation. The zone map amendment notice must contain the materials required by 38.220.410, BMC. Notices of the public hearing have been mailed, published in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle twice, and posted on the site as set forth under this policy. See Appendix A for more details. Policy 14: Annexation agreements must be executed and returned to the City within 60 days of distribution of the annexation agreement by the City, unless another time is specifically identified by the City Commission. Criterion Met. An annexation agreement has been prepared and will be provided to the landowner. This policy will be implemented only if the Commission acts to grant approval. If the application is denied then no annexation agreement will be necessary. Policy 15: When possible, the use of Part 46 annexations is preferred. Criterion Met. This annexation is being processed under Part 46 provisions. Policy 16: Where a road improvement district has been created, the annexation does not repeal the creation of the district. The City will not assume operations of the district until the entirety of the district has been annexed. Any funds held in trust for the district will be used to benefit the district after transfer to the City. Inclusion within a 35 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 18 of 31 district does not lessen the obligation to participate in general city programs that address the same subject. Neutral. No road improvement district is associated with this application. Policy 17: The City will notify the Gallatin County Planning Department and Fire District providing service to the area of applications for annexation. Criterion Met. The necessary agencies were notified and provided copies of the annexation. Policy 18: The City will require connection to and use of all City services upon development of annexed properties. The City may establish a fixed time frame for connection to municipal utilities. Upon development, unless otherwise approved by the City, septic systems must be properly abandoned and the development connected to the City sanitary sewer system. Upon development, unless otherwise approved by the City, water wells on the subject property may be used for irrigation, but any potable uses must be supplied from the City water distribution system and any wells disconnected from structures. The property owner must contact the City Water and Sewer Superintendent to verify disconnects of wells and septic systems. Criterion Met. There is an existing residential structure on the property utilizing on-site well and septic system. The applicant will be required to disconnect the septic system upon annexation and cease the use of the well for domestic water and connect to City water and sewer service. A term of annexation requires connection to municipal water and sewer implements this policy. In conjunction with future connection the septic system must be properly abandoned and the well disconnected from the domestic supply. Terms of Annexation 6-7 address these issues. SECTION 7 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission must consider the following criteria (letters A-K). As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has discretion to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the Applicant. See the application materials for the Applicant’s response to the criteria A zone map amendment must be in accordance with the growth policy (criteria A) and be designed to secure safety from fire and other dangers (criteria B), promote public health, public safety, and general welfare (criteria C), and facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements (criteria D). Therefore, to approve a zone map amendment the Commission must find Criteria A-D are met. 36 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 19 of 31 In addition, the Commission must also consider criteria E-K, and may find the zone map amendment to be positive, neutral, or negative with regards to these criteria. To approve the zone map amendment, the Commission must find the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E-K. In determining whether the criteria are met, Staff considers the entire body of regulations for land development. Standards which prevent or mitigated negative impacts are incorporated throughout the entire municipal code but are principally in Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A. Be in accordance with a growth policy. Yes. The BCP 2020, Chapter 5, p. 73, in the section titled Review Criteria for Zoning Amendments and Their Application, discusses how the various criteria in 76-2-304 MCA are applied locally. Application of the criteria varies depending on whether an amendment is for the zoning map or for the text of Chapter 38, BMC. The first criterion for a zoning amendment is accordance with a growth policy. Future Land Use Map The proposed amendment is a change to the zoning map. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze compliance with the future land use map. Chapter 3 of the BCP 2020 addresses the future land use map. The introduction to that chapter discusses the importance of the chapter. Following are some excerpts. “Future land use is the community’s fundamental building block. It is an illustration of the City’s desired outcome to accommodate the complex and diverse needs of its residents.” “The land use map sets generalized expectations for what goes where in the community. Each category has its own descriptions. Understanding the future land use map is not possible without understanding the category descriptions.” The area of this application has been within in the anticipated growth area of the City. As shown on the maps in Section 1, on the excerpt of the current future land use map, the property is designated as Urban Neighborhood through the recent modification of the FULM to correctly designate the FLU of the property. The Urban Neighborhood designation description reads: “This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home- based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving 37 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 20 of 31 commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. Applying a zoning district to specific parcels sets the required and allowed density. Higher density residential areas are encouraged to be, but are not required or restricted to, proximity to commercial mixed use areas to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities without requiring the use of a car.” The correlation between the future land use map of the growth policy and the zoning districts is presented in Table 4 of the Bozeman Community Plan 2020. As shown in the following Correlation with Zoning Table, the R-3 district is an implementing district of the Urban Neighborhood category. Goals and Policies A zoning amendment is also evaluated against the goals and policies of the BCP 2020. Most of the goals and policies are not applicable to this application. Relevant goals and objectives have been identified by staff. Conflict with the text of the growth policy has not been identified. The Short Term Action list on page 63 of the BCP 2020 describes 14 items to implement the growth policy. The first two relate to direct changes to the zoning map in support of listed goals and objectives. These include increasing the intensity of zoning districts in already developed areas. Beginning on page 71 of the BCP 2020 in the section titled Zoning Amendment Review, the document discusses how the City implements zoning for new areas, amendments to areas, and revisions to existing text. This section includes a discussion of when the City may initiate a zoning change to a more intensive district to increase development opportunities. This section demonstrates that the City, as a matter of policy, is supportive of more intensive zoning districts and development, even within already developed areas. It is inconsistent with this approach to zone at annexation for lower intensities than what infrastructure and planning documents will support. This policy approach does not specify any individual district but does lean towards the more intensive portion of the zoning district spectrum. 38 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 21 of 31 The Applicant simply states that, “Yes, we are requesting R-3 zoning and R-3 zoning currently exist on two sides of the property.” No further analysis of how the proposed R-3 zoning in conformance with the growth policy was provided. Therefore, staff submits additional analysis for consideration and includes specific goals and policy’s the amendment furthers. Goal DCD-1: Support urban development within the City. The proposed zoning is occurring in conjunction with an annexation. Any future development will be required to occur at urban densities and will be within the City. If the City Commission declines the annexation then the requested R-3 zoning will not occur. DCD-1.11 Pursue annexations consistent with the future land use map and adopted facility plans for development at urban intensity. The proposed zoning is consistent with the future land use map and is within the current facilities plans. Municipal infrastructure is installed in the adjacent roadway and has capacity accommodate additional development. Goal RC-3: Collaborate with Gallatin County regarding annexation and development patterns adjacent to the City to provide certainty for landowners and taxpayers. RC-3.3 Prioritize annexations that enable the incremental expansion of the City and its utilities. The zone map amendment is proposed in association with an annexation. The area to be annexed, for all intent and purpose, wholly surrounded by the City boundary and eliminates one of a number of isolated inholding with the City service area and street network. RC-3.4 Encourage annexation of land adjacent to the City prior to development and encourage annexation of wholly surrounded areas. The property, for all intent and purpose, is wholly surrounded by the City. The property is seeking annexation and municipal zoning for the purpose of maintaining and possibly expanding the use and intensity of the site. The application is in accordance with the growth policy. B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. Yes. The existing building, constructed in circa 1905, is of unknown quality, fire, and safety measures. Any renovations, expansions, or removal and replacement must meet the development standards of the City and, in some cases, might require retrofitting to ensure the building is safe for occupants and neighboring properties. The 2017 Fire and EMS Master Plan shows this property within the acceptable response reach of the Fire Department. Fire protection water supply will be provided by the City of Bozeman water system. The property is not within any delineated floodplain. Upon annexation the subject property will be provided with City emergency services including police, fire and 39 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 22 of 31 ambulance. The initial zoning of R-3 is not likely to adversely impact safety from fire and other dangers. The property will be required to conform to all City of Bozeman public safety, building and land use requirements. The City provides emergency services to adjacent properties and there will be no difficulty extending service to this parcel. C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare. Yes. The proposed zoning designation will promote general welfare by implementing the future land use map in the Bozeman Community Plan. Public health and safety will be positively affected as the proposed annexation will allow the existing structure to connect to the City sewer system, thereby removing a septic system and lessening resulting groundwater discharge. As noted in criterion B, further development and redevelopment must be in accordance with modern building, access, stormwater, pedestrian circulation, ingress and egress to the site, and full connection to the greater transportation network for users ensuring the promotion of public health, safety and general welfare. Public health and safety will be positively affected by requiring new and redevelopment to connect to municipal sanitary sewer and water systems, which will prevent groundwater pollution and depletion by wells and septic systems. D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. Yes. The BCP 2020, page 74, says regarding evaluation of Criteria B-D for zoning amendments: “For a map amendment, all three of the above elements are addressed primarily by the City’s long range facility Plans, the City’s capital improvements program, and development standards adopted by the City. The standards set minimum sizing and flow requirements, require dedication of parks, provision of right of way for people and vehicles, keep development out of floodplains, and other items to address public safety, etc. It is often difficult to assess these issues in detail on a specific site. For example, at the time of annexation, the final intensity of development is unknown and it may be many years before development occurs and the impacts are experienced. The availability of other planning and development review tools must be considered when deciding the degree of assurance needed to apply an initial zoning at annexation.” The City conducts extensive planning for municipal transportation, water, sewer, parks, and other facilities and services provided by the City. The adopted plans allow the City to consider existing conditions and identify enhancements needed to provide additional service needed by new development. The City implements these plans through its capital improvements program 40 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 23 of 31 that identifies individual projects, project construction scheduling, and financing of construction. Private development must demonstrate compliance with standards. The application site is located within the City’s land use, transportation, parks, and utility planning areas and those plans show this property as developing within the City when development is proposed. Adequacy of all these public requirements is evaluated during the subdivision and site development process. As stated in 38.300.020.C, the designation of a zoning district does not guarantee approval of new development until the City verifies the availability of needed infrastructure. All zoning districts in Bozeman enable a wide range of uses and intensities. At time of future subdivision or site plan review the need for individual services can be more precisely determined. No subdivision or site plan is approved without demonstration of adequate capacity. 38.300.020.C, “Placement of any given zoning district on an area depicted on the zoning map indicates a judgment on the part of the city that the range of uses allowed within that district are generally acceptable in that location. It is not a guarantee of approval for any given use prior to the completion of the appropriate review procedure and compliance with all of the applicable requirements and development standards of this chapter and other applicable policies, laws and ordinances. It is also not a guarantee of immediate infrastructure availability or a commitment on the part of the city to bear the cost of extending services.” The development of public infrastructure improvements to serve the property will be required to conform to the City of Bozeman’s adopted standards which require properties to construct public infrastructure and/or pay impact fees, assessments, and taxes to support transportation, water, sewer, school, parks, and other public requirements. City water and sewer lines are located adjacent to the property in the Flanders Mill Road and Sunstone right-of-way and the terms of annexation require the applicant to connect to municipal services and install any facilities required to provide full municipal services to the property. The property is accessed from Flanders Mill Road. Park dedication is not required at this time. However, if additional residential units are constructed on the site parkland dedication, improvements or cash-in-lieu, or a combination thereof may be required. Any future development of the property will be evaluated for additional required improvements during the plan review process. E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Yes. The R-3 zoning designation has requirements for setbacks, height, and lot coverage, which provide for the reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Any future development of the property will be required to conform to City standards for setbacks, height, lot coverage, and buffering. In addition to the zoning standards, adopted building codes contain more detailed requirements for air circulation, window placement, and building separation that further ensure the intent of this criterion is satisfied. 41 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 24 of 31 F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems. Yes. The proposed R-3 zoning designation will allow more intensity of use than the existing County zoning permits. No additional right of way or road improvements are required with initial annexation. Any future development will increase motorized and non-=-motorized traffic on the City’s transportation system, any additional tax revenue will, in part, offset increased impacts. Any additional development may trigger additional impact fee that will also offset some of the impacts created. One benefit is future development will require the construction of the missing sidewalk adjacent to the property. The City has the authority to require the landowner to install the sidewalk it is not a requirement of initial annexation. Terms of annexation requires full public right of way along Flanders Mill Road to ensure the transportation system can be built, On page 74-75 of the BCP 2020 in the discussion of application of the zoning criteria it says: “Development creates or funds many of the City’s local streets, intersection upgrades, and trails. Therefore, although a text or map amendment may allow more intense development than before, compliance with the adopted Plans and standards will provide adequate capacity to offset that increase.” As the zoning designation itself does not change traffic flow or transportation demand, and the compliance of future development with adopted standards will offset impacts from development. G. Promotion of compatible urban growth. Yes. The applicant responded to this criterion by stating that, “Yes, it brings new families to the area.” Individuals may have widely varying opinions about what constitutes compatibility. Compatible development and Compatible land use are defined in Article 38.7 BMC to establish a common reference for consideration of this criterion and application of development standards. They are defined as: “Compatible development. The use of land and the construction and use of structures which is in harmony with adjoining development, existing neighborhoods, and the goals and objectives of the city's adopted growth policy. Elements of compatible development include, but are not limited to, variety of architectural design; rhythm of architectural elements; scale; intensity; materials; building siting; lot and building size; hours of operation; and integration with existing community systems including water and sewer services, natural elements in the area, motorized and non-motorized transportation, and open spaces and parks. Compatible development does not require uniformity or monotony of architectural or site design, density or use. Compatible land use. A land use which may by virtue of the characteristics of its discernible outward effects exist in harmony with an adjoining land use of differing character. Effects 42 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 25 of 31 often measured to determine compatibility include, but are not limited to, noise, odor, light and the presence of physical hazards such as combustible or explosive materials.” As noted in the definition of Compatible development, there are many elements that contributed to compatibility. The final sentence of the definition deserves emphasis “Compatible development does not require uniformity or monotony of architectural or site design, density or use.” Compatible development can be different than what is already in place. The City has adopted a variety of standards to implement compatibility. The proposed R-3 district is a predominantly residential district. The allowed uses for residential districts are set in section 38.310.030. The proposed zoning is the same as adjacent properties to the east and north. An area of R-2 is to the south and institutional uses to the west, Gallatin High School. Existing development is well below permitted intensity. The proposed amendment is associated with an annexation creating continuity between the existing and surrounding uses. Staff concludes R-3 zone is compatible and is urban growth as called for in the growth policy. See also discussion for Criteria A & H. H. Character of the district. Yes. The proposed R-3 zoning promotes the character of the district as the intent of the Residential Moderate Density district is to “… provide for one- and two-household residential development at urban densities within the city in areas that present few or no development constraints.” Surrounding properties are low-density single-household residential. Adjacent properties in the City are zoned R-1. The property directly across South 3rd is zoned Residential Suburban (R-S) in the County and the property to the north which assorted with the Museum of the Rockies is zoned Public Lands and Institutions. The proposed R-3 zoning designation is consistent with the character of the neighborhood as well as existing development on the property. Section 76-2-302, MCA says “…legislative body may divide the municipality into districts of the number, shape, and area as are considered best suited to carry out the purposes [promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community] of this part.” Emphasis added. This proposal amends the zoning map and not the text. Therefore, no element of this amendment modifies the standards of any zoning district. The character of the districts as created by those standards remains intact. As noted above, the City Commission has latitude in considering the geographical extents of a zoning district. It is not expected that zoning freeze the character of an area in perpetuity. Rather, it provides a structured method to consider changes to the character. The City has defined compatible development as: “The use of land and the construction and use of structures which is in harmony with adjoining development, existing neighborhoods, and the goals and objectives of the city's adopted growth policy. Elements of compatible development include, but are not limited 43 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 26 of 31 to, variety of architectural design; rhythm of architectural elements; scale; intensity; materials; building siting; lot and building size; hours of operation; and integration with existing community systems including water and sewer services, natural elements in the area, motorized and non-motorized transportation, and open spaces and parks. Compatible development does not require uniformity or monotony of architectural or site design, density or use.” The City has adopted many standards to identify and avoid or mitigate demonstrable negative impacts of development. These will support the ability of future development in this new area of the R-3 district to be compatible with adjacent development and uphold the character of the area. I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses. Yes. The property is located in an area of single-household residential development which is suitable for uses allowed in the R-3 zoning district. The existing use of the property is residential. Future development, if constructed, would likely increase the number of houses on the site. Building heights, building setbacks, drive accesses, parking, open space requirements, and parkland will limit the maximum density the site can support. The proposed R-3 zoning designation is suitable for the current use of the property. The applicant argues that, “… we are requesting R-3 and R-3 boarders property.” J. Conserving the value of buildings. Yes. There is an existing single-household residential structure in an area of compatible residential land uses. The proposed R-3 zoning designation will allow for similar land use patterns and will thus conserve the value of buildings in the area. Any future development on the property will be subject to standards in the R-3 zoning district which will ensure the conservation of adjacent building values including but not limited to standards set forth in the Unified Development Code for fire safety, setbacks, buffers and building heights, which will help alleviate any potential negative impacts to the values of adjacent buildings as a result of future development on the subject property. Therefore, this criterion is met. K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area. Yes. As discussed in Criteria A above, this property has been planned for residential uses. The proposed R-3 zoning designation will encourage the most appropriate use of land as the property is surrounded by lower density residential development, which is consistent with the R-3 designation. Furthermore, the proposed R-3 zoning designation is consistent with the Bozeman Community Plan’s future land use map designation of “Urban Neighborhood.” 44 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 27 of 31 Spot Zoning Criteria Rezoning may, in certain factual circumstances, constitute impermissible “spot zoning.” The issue of whether a rezoning constitutes spot zoning was discussed by the Montana Supreme Court in Plains Grains LP v. Board of County Comm’rs of Cascade County and Little v. Bd. Of County Comm’rs, in which the Court determined that the presence of the following three conditions generally will indicate that a given situation constitutes spot zoning, regardless of variations in factual scenarios. 1. Is the proposed use significantly different from the prevailing land uses in the area? No. The R-3 zoning designation is primarily residential, as with the R-3 and R-2 districts, near service facilities with the city. The existing use is residential, the same as adjacent uses with supporting educational and spiritual uses adjacent as well. The stated purpose of the R-3 district is to provide for a variety of housing types, including single household dwellings, two to four household dwellings, and townhouses to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of non-residential uses which is similar to neighboring properties. Therefore, staff finds that this criterion is not met. 2. Is the area requested for the rezone rather small in terms of the number of separate landowners benefited from the proposed change? Yes and no. While the property is small and represents only one entity the community benefits. The application is submitted by one landowner in conjunction with annexation of the single 1.087 acre property. Although the City supports multiparty annexation applications, landowner annexation of single properties are the most frequent annexations. In this case, this property is last remaining un-annexed property in the immediate vicinity. The community benefits by eliminating one more inholding that is not paying city taxes but benefiting by its transportation system and services. As described in Criterion A above, the amendment advances the overall policies of the BCP 2020, the City’s adopted growth policy, and the growth policy and neighborhood plans for Gallatin County. As the application advances the growth policies there are benefits to the larger community from the amendment. Although there is generalized benefit to the community, the number of direct beneficiaries is small. 3. Would the change be in the nature of “special legislation” designed to benefit only one or a few landowners at the expense of the surrounding landowners or the general public? No. While the applicant/landowner will directly benefit from the proposed zone map amendment, the proposed amendment is not at the expense of surrounding landowners or the 45 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 28 of 31 general public. As discussed above in the various review criteria above, no substantial negative impacts are identified due to this amendment. As discussed in Criterion A, the application is consistent both the City’s and the County’s growth policy. The growth policy is the overall land use policy for the community. Consistency with the growth policy demonstrates benefit to the general public. As discussed under Criterion D, the City’s development standards will require the applicant to provide the needed infrastructure to support any proposed development prior to construction of homes. Concurrency and adequacy of infrastructure remove most potential injury to others. As discussed in the various review criteria above, no substantial negative impacts or hazards are identified due to this amendment which cannot be resolved or mitigated through other City standards, policies or regulations. Although the zoning map is changing, the associated Terms of Annexation, and the development standards referenced throughout the analysis of the zone map amendment will limit impacts of new development and avoid expense to the general public or surrounding landowners. When looking at the City as a whole, Bozeman is in need of additional housing to meet increased demand for a variety of housing options. The City Commission has adopted legal documents by which land uses and development patterns are determined within city limits. The Unified Development Code (UDC), along with the growth policy (BDC 2020) provide the guiding framework that governs what growth looks like in our community. These documents go through numerous iterations as the knowledge and understanding of development principles evolve, and as the needs of our community change. The UDC establishes technical requirements that dictate the layout of subdivisions, the placement and height of buildings, the width of driveways, allowable land uses, and a plethora of other development requirements that shape the fabric of the community, and protect the safety of its members. The growth policy is a visionary document that contains the long term goals of the City for the next 20 years. These goals were crafted based on current growth and development trends, contemporary planning theory, and through a robust public engagement process that spanned the course of several years. The layered dynamic of the two policy documents creates the ability for our community to begin with large scale ideas about community growth and needs and distill them down into a technical guide for how that growth and development can physically occur. The goals and themes of the growth policy informs the technical content of the UDC which contains provisions whose main focus is protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. This dynamic ensures that locations and standards of zoning districts are a benefit to the community as a whole and do not benefit only one landowner. As noted in Section 6, Criterion A, the proposed application is in accordance with the growth policy 46 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 29 of 31 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION. The City will accept written protests from property owners against the proposal described in this report until the close of the public hearing before the City Commission. Pursuant to 76-2-305, MCA, a protest may only be submitted by the owner(s) of real property within the area affected by the proposal or by owner(s) of real property that lie within 150 feet of an area affected by the proposal. The protest must be in writing and must be signed by all owners of the real property. In addition, a sufficient protest must: (i) contain a description of the action protested sufficient to identify the action against which the protest is lodged; and (ii) contain a statement of the protestor's qualifications (including listing all owners of the property and the physical address), to protest the action against which the protest is lodged, including ownership of property affected by the action. Signers are encouraged to print their names after their signatures. A person may in writing withdraw a previously filed protest at any time prior to final action by the City Commission. Protests must be delivered to the Bozeman City Clerk, 121 North Rouse Avenue, PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. APPENDIX A - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was published in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on July 3 and 10, 2022. The site was posted on site and notices mailed by the applicant as required by 38.220 and the required confirmation provided to the Planning Office. Notice was or will be provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to any public hearing. As of the writing of this report on July 1, 2022, no written comments have been received on this application. APPENDIX B - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as “Urban Neighborhood” in the Bozeman Community Plan 2020. 1. URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD. This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an 47 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 30 of 31 area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. Applying a zoning district to specific parcels sets the required and allowed density. Higher density residential areas are encouraged to be, but are not required or restricted to, proximity to commercial mixed use areas to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities without requiring the use of a car. Proposed Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The applicant has requested zoning of R-3, “Residential Moderate Density” in association with the annexation of the property. According to Sec. 38.300.100(C) of the Unified Development Code, “The intent of the R-3 residential medium density district is to provide for the development of one- to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city. This purpose is accomplished by: (1) providing for minimum lot sizes in developed areas consistent with the established development patterns while providing greater flexibility for clustering lots and mixing housing types in newly developed areas and (2) providing for a variety of housing types, including single household dwellings, two to four household dwellings, and townhouses to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of non- residential uses. Use of this zone is appropriate for areas with good access to parks, community services and/or transit. The Zoning Correlation Table on Page 58 of the Bozeman Community Plan, 2020 correlates zoning districts with the Growth Policy’s land use categories, demonstrating that the proposed zoning designation of R-3 48 22043 Staff Report for the 130 Flanders Mill Road Annexation & ZMA Page 31 of 31 correlates with the Growth Policy’s future land use designation of “Urban Neighborhood”. Authorized uses in Residential districts are detailed in section 38.310.030. APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Vivian Helvik, 130 Flanders Mill Road, Bozeman, MT 59771 Applicant: Torok & Company, 19 North 10th Ave., Suite 6, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representative: Torok & Company, 19 North 10th Ave., Suite 6, Bozeman, MT 59715 Report By: Tom Rogers, Senior Planner, Community Development Department FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Annexation or Zone Map Amendment. Future development will incur costs and generate review according to standard City practices. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?startid=260436&cr=1 49 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Anna Bentley, Interim Director Community Development SUBJECT:1001 Thomas Drive Annexation Requesting Annexation of 15.115 Acres and Zone Map Amendment of the City Zoning Map for the Establishment of a Zoning Designation of REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use) Application 22067 MEETING DATE:July 18, 2022 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:I move to continue review of this application to August 1, 2022. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:The notice was mailed and published in the paper for this application. The applicant did not post the site with the notice sign as required in a timely way. The continuation will allow the applicant to correct this error. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:None FISCAL EFFECTS:None Report compiled on: July 7, 2022 50 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Anna Bentley, Interim Director Community Development SUBJECT: 6730 Davis Lane Annexation Requesting Annexation of 10.071 Acres and Amendment of the City Zoning Map for the Establishment of a Zoning Designation of REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed-Use District) Application 22020 MEETING DATE:July 18, 2022 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:I move to continue review of application 22020 to August 1, 2022. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:The mailed and newspaper notices were distributed as required. The applicant did not post the site with the required notice sign in a timely manner. The continuation will enable the applicant to correct this error. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:None. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Report compiled on: July 7, 2022 51 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Lynn Hyde, Development Review Planner Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Anna Bentley, Community Development Interim Director SUBJECT:Recommendation of approval for a site plan for construction of a multi- household condominium development including 8 buildings, with three (3) mixed use buildings, one (1) commercial building, and four (4) three-unit buildings. Required parking, stormwater management, landscaping, and other improvements are included. MEETING DATE:July 18, 2022 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Quasi-Judicial RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the Community Development Interim Director to conditionally- approve the site plan. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:This application is a proposed mixed-use development with 8 buildings total. Three (3) of the buildings are mixed use with both residential and commercial uses proposed, one (1) building is commercial only, and there are four (4) three-unit rowhouse buildings. The site is bordered by two public right of ways, West Babcock St to the north, South Ferguson Ave to the east, and a private condominium development to the west and south, Cottonwood Condominiums. The property is zoned RO and is approximately 8.64 acres. The Applicant has requested one departure for transparency requirements in the block frontage standards. Refer to the Staff Report for additional discussion. Due to the large volume of files, not all elevations or graphics are provided as attachments, instead please navigate to view all submitted documents. See link below. To view all submitted documents, navigate here, https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx? id=136921&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN&cr=1, then navigate to Planning Project 21235. To view all public comments received thus far, navigate here, https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx? 52 id=262361&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN UNRESOLVED ISSUES:There are no unresolved issues at this time. As is standard, there will be conditions of approval prior to final site plan approval. ALTERNATIVES:As identified by the Board. FISCAL EFFECTS:Fiscal impacts are undetermined at this time, but will include increased property tax revenues from new development, along with increased costs to deliver municipal services to the property. Impact fees will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits for individual developments along with City sewer and water connection fees. Attachments: 21235_SixRangeCondominiums_SR_ComDevBoard.pdf Development Review Application.pdf 001 Cover Sheet.pdf 027 Site Plan.pdf 030 Material Pallete.pdf 030.1 Overall Elevations.pdf 053 Landscape Plan.pdf 093 Elevations Triplex.pdf 066 Overall Elevations - Building A.pdf 074 Overall Elevations.pdf 082 Overall Elevations.pdf 086 Exterior Elevations - Building D.pdf 031 Graphics - Bldg A.pdf 036 Graphics Bldg B.pdf 038 Graphics Bldg B.pdf 040 Graphics Bldg B.pdf 043 Graphics Bldg C.pdf 047 Graphics Bldg D.pdf 051 Graphics Tri-Plex.pdf Report compiled on: July 7, 2022 53 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 1 of 20 Application No. 21235 Type Site Plan Project Name Six Range Condominiums Summary Proposal to develop an undeveloped parcel with 8 buildings, including 3 mixed use buildings, 1 commercial building, and 4 3-unit rowhouse buildings,183 residential units. The Applicant requested a Departure from a Block Frontage transparency standard for one of the mixed-use buildings (Building A), for the façade facing West Babcock. Zoning R-0, Residential Office Ditit Growth Policy Urban Neighborhood Parcel Size 8.64 acres Overlay District(s) None Street Address 4720 West Babcock Street, Bozeman, MT 59718 Legal Description Lot A1 of Minor Subdivision 338, S10, T02 S, R05 E, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT Owner Paine Group, Matt Paine, PO Box 418, Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant MRGR Office, 125 N. Wallace, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representative Justin Harmon, 125 N. Wallace, Bozeman, MT 59715 Staff Planner Lynn Hyde Engineer Alicia Paz-Solis Noticing Public Comment Period Site Posted Adjacent Owners Newspaper Legal Ad 07/02/2022 – 08/01/2022 07/02/2022 07/15/2022 N/A Advisory Boards Board Date Recommendation Development Review Committee 06/22/2022 The application is adequate, conforms to standards, and is sufficient for approval with conditions and code provisions Community Development Review Board 07/18/2022 TBD Recommendation The application is adequate, conforms to standards, and is sufficient for approval with conditions and code provisions as noted below. Decision Authority Director of Community Development Date Full application and file of record: Community Development Department, 20 E. Olive St., Bozeman, MT 59715 54 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 2 of 20 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. Additional conditions of approval and code corrections are required and will be included with the final report provided to the Director of Community Development 1. The Applicant is advised that unmet code provisions or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) or State law. 2. Prior to Final Site Plan Approval, please provide documentation of HRDC approval of the transit shelter proposed. This approval is required in order for the proposal to be eligible for the 10% residential parking reduction requested per BMC 38.540.050.A.1.b.(4) – Residential and BMC 38.540.050.A.2.c.(3) – Commercial. 3. The Applicant must pay the Cash-in-lieu of Water Rights (CILW) prior to site plan approval. The CILWR is estimated to be $182,649.10. 4. Approval of the final engineering design, including location and grade, for the sewer main extensions must be obtained from the Engineering Department and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, when applicable, prior to issuance of any building permit for the development. 5. A thirty (30) foot public utility easement must be provided during the infrastructure review. An additional ten (10) feet of width is required for each additional main that occupies the easement. 6. The applicant must provide an estimate of the peak-hour sanitary sewer demand certified by a professional engineer for the project. Approval of the sewer report can be done during infrastructure review. 7. Infrastructure review will be required for the 36” stormwater/irrigation main to be reviewed and ensure it is built to meet or exceed City standards. 8. The Applicant must pay the Cash-in-lieu of Parkland (CIlP) prior to site plan approval. The CILP is estimated to be $280,427.04. CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. No tree shall be planted closer than three feet to the back of the curb or edging equivalent. BMC 38.550.050.C.2.d. 2. The required public street light(s) must be included in a Special Improvement Lighting District (SILD), in accordance with the City of Bozeman Lighting and Electrical Specifications, prior to occupancy per BMC 38.400.070. 3. A car share agreement must be provided to the city to be reviewed and approved prior to Final Site Plan Approval. 55 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 3 of 20 Figure 1: Current Zoning Map 56 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 4 of 20 Figure 2: Future Land Use Map 57 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 5 of 20 Figure 3: Proposed site plan 58 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 6 of 20 Figures 4: Building Elevations Triplexes 59 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 7 of 20 Building A 60 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 8 of 20 Building B 61 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 9 of 20 Building C 62 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 10 of 20 Building D 63 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 11 of 20 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Plan Review, Section 38.230.100, BMC In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the Director of Community Development shall consider the following: 1. Conformance with Article 1 - Consistency with the City’s adopted Growth Policy 38.100.040.D Meets Code? Growth Policy Land Use Urban Neighborhood Yes Zoning R-O, Residential Office District Yes Comments: Growth Policy: Urban Neighborhood: This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. Applying a zoning district to specific parcels sets the required and allowed density. Higher density residential areas are encouraged to be, but are not required or restricted to, proximity to commercial mixed use areas to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities without requiring the use of a car. The parcel, and adjacent neighborhood are zoned R-O. When adopting zoning standards, the City Commission evaluates a set of required criteria that includes considering: Promotion of compatible urban growth and the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses. • Promotion of compatible urban growth: The Growth Policy states that “This definition explicitly rejects uniformity as being necessary for compatibility. Compatibility is considered within and between districts. The determination of compatibility takes place at several levels, including 1) what uses are allowed within each district, 2) creation of standards for new development to lessen impacts to adjacent land/persons, 3) creation of building and site design standards, and 4) application of future land use areas through the community plan and development of the zoning map. (Growth Policy, P75)” Thus while this proposed development may not mirror the adjacent existing developments, it is meeting the standards that have been adopted including an allowed use, building and site design standards, and the proposed land use intent. • Character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses: Another guideline that is used to determine the appropriate zoning district for an area is the character of the district. When considering the appropriate zoning district, the Commission considers “both the actual and possible built environment. . . . Most of Bozeman has zoning that allows more development than the current owners utilize. This reflects many personal preferences and economic decisions. . . Nothing in the zoning amendment or site review criteria requires the Commission restrict one owner because an adjacent owners chooses to not use all zoning potential. (Growth Policy, P76-77)”. Thus, while the development does propose greater densities and heights, and larger building form, than its neighbors, that is not prohibited, nor grounds for denial of the project. The proposal is meeting the 64 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 12 of 20 City’s form and intensity standards, along with other requirements that have been codified with the intent of supporting the land use and zoning districts. Zoning District: Residential Office District (R-O): The intent of the R-O residential-office district is to provide for and encourage the development of multi-household and apartment development and compatible professional offices and businesses that would blend well with adjacent land uses. These purposes are accomplished by: 1. Providing for a mixture of housing types, including single and multi-household dwellings to serve the varying needs of the community’s residents. Use of this zone is appropriate for areas characterized by office or multi-household development; and/or areas along arterial corridors or transitional areas between residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. The RO district intent and purpose specifically calls out creation of multi-household and apartment development, and in tandem, Table 38.310.030.A shows both apartments and rowhouses as a Principal use category. The proposal is consistent with the intent and principal uses allowed. Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC): Section 38.300.010 says in part – “There is a presumption that the uses set forth for each district will be compatible with each other when the standards of this chapter are met and any applicable conditions of approval have been satisfied. The presumption of compatibility may be overcome by a showing of specific evidence through the development review process that proves a development to be non-compliant with applicable standards.” The proposal is meeting the standards of Section 38, and thus far, no specific evidence has been provided indicating that the proposal is non-compliant with the neighborhood. Article 5 – Project Design’s purpose is to implement the Bozeman’s growth policy. In addition Article 5 has adopted standards to ensure new commercial and multi-household development is of high quality and beneficially contributes to Bozeman’s character, ensures new developments within existing neighborhoods are compatible with, and enhance the character of Bozeman’s neighborhoods, enhances the livability of Bozeman’s residential development, maintains and enhance property values within Bozeman, all while providing clear objectives for those embarking on the planning and design of development projects in Bozeman. The project has been reviewed for conformance to Article 5 and found sufficient. Connectivity The Growth Policy and BMC both discuss the importance of connectivity between new and existing neighborhoods. The proposed site has four roads and one trail that would typically require connection (West Babcock St to the north, South Ferguson Ave to the east, Mill Creek Drive to the south, Slough Creek Drive to the west and a shared use path to the south. The proposal gains access from South Ferguson Ave and West Babcock however it was determined by the City reviewers that requiring connections to Mill Creek Drive, Slough Creek Drive and the public trail was not possible. In order to make the connectivity happen, there has to be substantial evidence that a public right of way (ROW) exists to connect to the two drives within Cottonwood Condominiums and the trail. While the most recent plat does show a public easement for the ROW and trail, there is also a note on the face of the plat for the public easement’s ‘to be abandoned’. With the lack of substantial evidence to show if the easement exists or was abandoned, the City could not require the connections, and the landowners of adjacent properties do not desire the connections. 2. Conformance with Article 1 - All other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations (38.100.080) 65 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 13 of 20 Condominium ownership Yes, with subsequent submittal Comments: The applicant has indicated they intend to condominiumize the units. Condominium developments must comply with all provisions of the Unit Ownership Act, MCA 70-23-101 and must comply with BMC 38.360.100. The Applicant must submit a Condominium Review application to the Community Development Department to create condominiums for the development. 3. Conformance with Article 2, including the cessation of any current violations (38.200.160) Meets Code? Current Violations NA Comments: There are no current violations associated with the property or the application. 4. Conformance with Article 2 - Submittal material (38.220) requirements and plan review for applicable permit types (38.230) Meets Code? Site Plan Yes, with conditions Submittal requirements 38.220.100 Yes, with conditions Phasing of development 38.230.020.B No. of phases: 0 NA Comments: The project does not propose phasing. Any additional use permit (Conditional Use Permit) 38.230.120 or (Special use Permit) 38.230.120 NA Comments: No additional permits are required for the proposal. 5. Conformance with Article 3 - Zoning Provisions (38.300) Meets Code? Permitted uses 38.310 Townhomes / Apartments / Commercial Yes Form and intensity standards 38.320 Zoning: Setbacks (feet) Structures Parking / Loading Yes Front 15’ NA Rear 20’ NA Side 5’ NA Alley NA NA Comments: The buildings are meeting the required form and intensity standards for R-0 zoning district. For the front setbacks, refer to the Block Frontage standards of Section 7a below. The amount of units allowed is determined based on the size of the lot. For apartment buildings in the RO zoning district, the first unit needs 5,000sf of lot area, and subsequent units need 1,200sf of lot area. The rowhouse buildings need 3,000sf per unit. The Parcel is 8.638 acres (376,271sf) and the total lot area needed for the proposed 183 residential units is 252,600sf, thus meeting the minimum lot size per unit required (or density allowed). • Three apartment buildings (57 units each): [56 X 1,200sf=67,200 + 5,000sf 72,200sf/building *3]: 216,600sf • 4 – three unit buildings (3,000/unit): 36,000sf • Total lot needed for residential is (216,600 + 36,000): 252,600sf. Lot coverage NA in RO zone Allowed: No minimum NA 66 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 14 of 20 Building height 31’ – 44’ proposed Allowed: < 3:12 – 50’ > 3:12 – 60’ Yes Comments: There is no maximum lot coverage. The building heights as proposed are: 43’,6” (building A); 42’,4”; (building B); 42’,4” (building C); 26’,4” (building D); 31’ (triplexes), falling within the allowable height limits. Applicable zone specific or overlay standards 38.330-40 NA Comments: There are no zone specific or overlay standards for this site and zone. General land use standards and requirements 38.350 Yes Comments: The proposal is meeting the standards and requirements. Applicable supplemental use criteria 38.360 Yes Supplemental uses/type 38.360.100 - Condominiums 38.360.250 – Townhouse and rowhouse dwellings Yes Comments: The application is required to meet the additional supplemental criteria for condominiums and townhouse/rowhouse dwellings. This includes providing private fenced open space areas in front of each townhome which is proposed. Each townhouse/rowhouse unit has adequately sized garages for parking and backing maneuverability. The design of the townhouse/rowhouses provides articulation at a cadence consistent with the width of the buildings. This articulation is provided by reversing one of the buildings entrances and varying the design of the windows on the center unit. Wireless facilities 38.370 NA Affordable Housing 38.380.010 NA Affordable housing plan NA Comments: Affordable housing is neither required nor proposed. 6a. Conformance with Article 4 - Community Design Provisions: Transportation Facilities and Access (38.400) Meets Code? Streets 38.400.010 Yes Street and road dedication 38.400.020 NA Access easements NA Level of Service 38.400.060 Transportation grid adequate to serve site Yes Comments: Adjacent streets exist to serve the site, no additional dedication is needed. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was required. An additional discussion and analysis without traffic mitigation measures by future development in the area (i.e., Ferguson Farms) was provided. Sidewalks 38.400.080 Yes Comments: Sidewalks for both West Babcock St and South Ferguson will be provided by this development. Drive access 38.400.090 Access to site: 4 Yes Fire lanes, curbs, signage and striping Yes Comments: The proposal has four (4) drive accesses to public right of ways (ROW). There are three (3) accesses to West Babcock Street and one (1) access to South Ferguson Ave. Additional accesses were originally proposed to Mill Creek Drive and South Hanley Ave, however as discussed in Section 1, those connections were not possible. Street vision triangle 38.400.100 Yes Transportation pathways 38.400.110 Yes Pedestrian access easements for shared use pathways and similar transportation facilities NA Public transportation 38.400.120 Yes 67 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 15 of 20 Comments: A covered bus transit stop is proposed to be located within 800 feet of the property site. 6b. Conformance with Article 4 – Community Design Provisions: Community Design and Elements (38.410) Meets Code? Neighborhood centers 38.410.020 NA Comments: The proposed project is less than ten net acres in size, thus does not require a neighborhood center. Lot and block standards 38.410.030-040 NA Midblock crossing: rights of way for pedestrians alternative block delineation Yes Comments: Crosswalks were added at the crossing of West Babcock Street and Kimball Ave. If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area NA Provisions for utilities including efficient public services and utilities 38.410.050-060 Yes Easements (City and public utility rights-of-way etc.) NA Water, sewer, and stormwater Yes Other utilities (electric, natural gas, communications) Yes CIL of water rights (CILWR) Yes, with condition Comments: A thirty (30) foot public utility easement will need to be provided with infrastructure submittal. The Cash-in-lieu of water rights will be paid prior to final Site Plan approval. Municipal infrastructure requirements 38.410.070 Yes Comments: Municipal water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer systems proposed with this project have been reviewed by engineering and have received approval. Water & sewer reports must be finalized and certified by a Professional Engineering with infrastructure submittal. Prior to occupancy, public street lights must be included in a Special Improvement Lighting District (SILD) Grading & drainage 38.410.080 Yes Location, design and capacity of stormwater facilities Yes Stormwater maintenance plan Yes Landscaping: native species, curvilinear, 75% live vegetation 38.410.080.H Yes Comments: All such services and the landscape plan are meeting BMC standards. Location, design and capacity of stormwater facilities was reviewed by engineering. The stormwater maintenance pan includes permeable pavers west of the property. The proposed 36-inch stormwater/irrigation pipe (S. Ferguson Ave) will need to go through City’s infrastructure review process. Watercourse setback 38.410.100 NA Watercourse setback planting plan 38.410.100.2.f NA Comments: There are no watercourses present thus no setbacks or plantings required. 6c. Conformance with Article 4 – Community Design Provisions: Park and Recreation Requirements (38.420) Meets Code? Parkland requirements 38.420.020.A 3.11 acres @ $2.07/sf = $244,268.36 Yes Cash donation in lieu (CIL) 38.420.030 Yes, with condition & code provision Improvements in-lieu NA 68 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 16 of 20 Comments: The applicant has requested to pay cash in lieu (CIL) of parkland dedication for the 3.11 acres of parkland required. Staff concurs with the justification provided by the applicant. Additionally, it is not feasible to get 100% street frontage for a park as is required by the municipal code. Any park at the corner of Babcock and Ferguson would be adjacent to a busy, wide street, which is a high traffic area and not desirable to place a park along. There is ~1 acre of open space in the center of the site for the residents use. Thus the applicant is required to pay the CIL prior to final Site Plan Approval. Park Frontage 38.420.060 NA Park development 38.420.080 NA Recreation pathways 38.420.110 NA Park/Recreational area design NA Comments: There are no public parks adjacent to the Site. There is a shared use trail to the south however it is in private ownership and neither the applicant nor the City have the ability to require connection without the property owner granting permission. The most recent plat references a 30’ public trail easement, however it also includes a comment ‘to be abandoned’. While there was no found record of the actual abandonment, there was also lack of substantial evidence that made it certain if there was the ability to provide a public connection or not, thus the City cannot require it and the connections are not proposed to be provided at this time. As such, a cash-in-lieu of required parkland contribution is appropriate. 7a. Conformance with Article 5 – Project Design: Block Frontage Standards (38.510) Meets Code? Block frontage classification W. Babcock – Mixed/landscape S. Ferguson Ave – Mixed/landscape Special Residential along sidewalks and internal pathways. Yes, with the Director granting of the departure request Departure criteria Yes, North Façade of Building A, transparency Yes, with departure approval Comments: The proposal has multiple block frontages it is required to meet. To the north and east, West Babcock and South Ferguson Ave respectively have mixed block frontage designations which the applicant has chosen to apply the landscape block frontage to. Internally on the site, the buildings orient towards internal sidewalks that require special residential block frontage where residential is on the ground floor facing the sidewalk. The proposal is meeting the block frontage standards with one departure request which is discussed below. Departure Request: Building A’s northern façade is facing West Babcock St thus requiring the mixed/landscape block frontage. The applicant has requested a departure citing that “new windows would either be placed in closets or the exit stair which already has a fully glazed wall. More windows would also reduce the performance of this façade.” Departures are allowed per 38.510.030.C.3. which lists criteria that the proposed alternative design treatment of façade area between ground level windows provides visual interest to the pedestrian and mitigates impacts of any blank wall areas. Staff supports the departure based on the trellis treatment with clematis proposed as the growing vine. The building is setback from the street 16’ and has landscaped provided between the building and the street softening the impact that the lack of transparency will have for pedestrians 69 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 17 of 20 7b. Conformance with Article 5 – Project Design: Site Planning and Design Elements (38.520) Meets Code? Design and arrangement of the elements of the plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community, neighborhood, and other approved development and produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive development Yes Relationship to adjacent properties 38.520.030 Yes Non-motorized circulation and design systems to enhance convenience and safety across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to paving patterns, pathway design, landscaping and lighting 38.520.040 Yes Comments: The proposed site has four roads and one trail that would typically require connection (West Babcock St to the north, South Ferguson Ave to the east, and within an adjacent neighborhood, Cottonwood Condominiums, Mill Creek Drive to the south, Slough Creek Drive to the west and a shared use path to the south. The proposal gains access from South Ferguson Ave and West Babcock however it was determined by the City that requiring connections to Mill Creek Drive, Slough Creek Drive and the public trail was not possible. In order to make the connectivity happen, there has to be substantial evidence that a public right of way exists to connect to the two drives within Cottonwood Condominiums and the trail. While the most recent plat does show a public easement for the right of way and trail, there is also a note ‘to be abandoned’. With the lack of substantial evidence to show if the easement exists or was abandoned, the City could not require the connections, and the landowners of adjacent properties do not desire the connections. Design of vehicular circulation systems to assure that vehicles can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the general community 38.520.050 Yes Internal roadway design 38.520.050.D Yes Comments: The internal drives meet the municipal code standards. On-site open space 38.520.060 Yes Total required Residential: 24,650 square feet Yes Total provided Residential: 81,347 square feet Yes Comments: The proposal is meeting the required residential open space through a combination of private front yards (townhouse/rowhouse), common open space (both outdoor and indoor), private balconies, and shared rooftop balconies. See the open space table below. (Note, GL standards for ground level) 70 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 18 of 20 7d. Conformance with Article 5 – Parking (38.540) Meets Code? Parking requirements 38.540.050 Yes Yes, with condition of approval. Parking requirements residential 38.540.050.A.1 381 Reductions residential 38.540.050.A.1.b Yes Parking requirements nonresidential 38.540.050.A.2 32 Reductions nonresidential 38.540.050.A.2.c Yes Provided off-street 350 Provided on-street 0 Bicycle parking 38.540.050.A.4 82 Comments: Location and design of service areas and mechanical equipment 38.520.070 Yes Comments: The trash enclosures are located for convenient access and are appropriately screened from adjacent public common areas, residential areas, as well as upper story residential uses with the trash enclosures covered on top as well. 7c. Conformance with Article 5 – Project Design: Building Design (38.530) Meets Code? Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development 38.530.030 Yes Building massing and articulation 38.530.040 Yes Building details, materials, and blank wall treatments 38.530.050-070 Yes Comments: Façade articulation is provided through use of windows, entrances, balconies, and vertical modulations. Per 38.530.040.E., the longer buildings (Buildings A, B, & C) are required to provide at least one massing break as the buildings are greater than 150’ in width which has been provided through the use of vertical building modulation. Per 38.530.070.B., a blank wall, which is defined as over ten feet in height, with a horizontal length greater than 15 feet, and does not include a transparent window or door, is present on the northern façade of Building A. The proposal has a vertical landscaped trellis to treat the blank wall which is permitted by 38.530.070.C. The rowhouses also have additional design standards discussed in section 5 above under supplemental criteria. 71 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 19 of 20 The residential component of this site requires 380.5 parking stalls and the commercial component requires 31.6 parking spaces. There are 339 parking spaces provided to serve the residential and commercial components of the proposal. When a residential or commercial development is within 800 feet of a developed and serviced transit stop that has a shelter installed, and the transit route runs on not less than an hourly schedule a minimum of five days per week, the proposal may request a 10% parking reduction. The applicant has requested this reduction, and is providing a covered shelter on an approved stop within 800’ of the development. In addition, the applicant is requesting an allowed reduction of 50% for restaurant use and 20% for office use. There is also a reduction request for car share spaces as well as for providing covered bicycle parking. The reductions requested are meeting the criteria required to be approved. A car share agreement must be provided to the city to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to Final Site Plan Approval. Loading and uploading area requirements 38.540.080 NA First berth – minimum 70 feet length, 12 feet in width, 14 feet in height NA Additional berth – minimum 45 feet length NA Comments: No loading berths are provided nor required for the proposal. 7e. Conformance with Article 5 – Landscaping (38.550) Meets Code? Mandatory landscaping requirements 38.550.050 Yes, with code requirements Drought tolerant species 75% required Yes Parking lot landscaping Yes Additional screening Yes Street frontage Yes Street median island NA Acceptable landscape materials Yes Protection of landscape areas Yes Irrigation: plan, water source, system type Yes Residential adjacency Yes Comments: The project has been reviewed and found to be in conformance with the landscaping requirements, including, but not limited to, minimum drought tolerant species proposed, parking lot landscaping, street frontage landscaping, and acceptable landscape materials proposed. The parking located on the southern boundary of the property is adjacent to another residential development, thus requiring screening that is not less than 4 feet in width, and maintained at a height of four to six feet. The applicant has provided this screening and proposed landscaping, that once it reaches maturity, will meet the 4’ width and 4’-6’ height requirements. Landscaping of public lands 38.550.070 NA Comments: No landscaping of public lands is required. 7f. Conformance with Article 5 – Signs (38.560) Meets Code? Allowed SF/building 38.560.060 NA Proposed SF/building NA Comments: No signs are proposed or approved with this Site Plan application. Any future signs will be required to go through the permitting process with the City and receive an approved sign permit. 7g. Conformance with Article 5 – Lighting (38.560) Meets Code? Site lighting (supports, cutoff, footcandles, temperature) 38.570.040 Yes 72 Community Development Board Staff Report Six Range Condominiums Site Plan Application 21235 July 14, 2022 Page 20 of 20 Building-mounted lighting (supports, cutoff, footcandles, temperature) 38.570.040.B Yes Comments: All light fixtures meet code. 8. Conformance with Article 6 – Natural Resource Protection Meets Code? Floodplain regulations 38.600 NA Wetland regulations 38.610 NA Comments: There are no FEMA regulated floodplains nor known wetlands on site. 9. Relevant Comment from Affected Parties (38.220) Meets Code? Public Comment Yes Comments: The public notice period is set from July 2, 2022 through August 01, 2022. At the date this report was written, 12 public comments had been received. 10. Division of Land Pertaining to Subdivisions (38.240-Part 4) Meets Code? Subdivision exemptions NA Required easements Yes Comments: All required easements must be provided and approved prior to the Final Site Plan approval. 73 74 75 Statement For Elevator-Served Buildings1. Since this multi-family residential building is elevator-served, all dwelling units are covered by FHA and shall comply with FHA DM 1998 Covered Dwelling Unit requirements. State and Local Accessibility Codes often provide additional accessibility requirements beyond the requirements of the Federal standard of FHA. State and Local Accessibility Codes often require that a portion of the dwelling units provided on a site be designed and constructed as Type 'A' Dwelling Units per ANSI 2009 Section 1003. It is important to note that jurisdiction, including interpretation and enforcement, of the Type 'A' Unit elements rests with the local governing authority and not with FHA.2. Compliance to the local accessibility code requirements for the Type 'A' Units is to be reviewed by the local building department prior to issuance of a building permit, and again at near completion of construction for occupancy. Upon inspection for building occupancy, the local building inspector may provide additional requirements, interpretations, and exceptions for compliance to the local building/accessibility code.Parkland Dedication Tracking TableNumber of Residential Units:192Net Lot Area: 8.638 acres / 376,271 SF Maximum Dedication Requirement: 12 units per acreCalculated Units for Dedication:103.66 units = 12 units/acre x 8.638 acresRequired Park Land Dedication:2.709 acresRequested Method to Meet Dedications: Fee in LieuStatement For Walk-Up Buildings (Non-Elevator Served Buildings)1. Since these multi-family residential buildings are not served by elevators, only the ground floor dwelling units are covered by FHA and shall comply with FHA DM 1998 Covered Dwelling Unit requirements. State and Local Accessibility Codes often provide additional accessibility requirements beyond the requirements of the Federal standard of FHA. State and Local Accessibility Codes often require that a portion of the dwelling units provided on a site be designed and constructed as Type 'A' Dwelling Units per ANSI 2009 Section 1003. It is important to note that jurisdiction, including interpretation and enforcement, of the Type 'A' Unit elements rests with the local governing authority and not with FHA.2. Compliance to the local accessibility code requirements for the Type 'A' Units is t be reviewed by the local building department prior to issuance of a building permit, and again at near completion of construction for occupancy. Upon inspection for building occupancy, the local building inspector may provide additional requirements, interpretations, and exceptions for compliance to the local building/accessibility code.Project Accessiblity ComplianceThe drawings for this project have been reviewed for accessibility compliance to the fair housing act (FHA). The tenant covered dwelling units in this project have been reviewed for compliance to the international building code 2018 edition. the ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 version of the accessible and usable buildings and facilities manual was used in conjunction with the international building code 2018 edition in reviewing the dwelling units and the common use areas of this project for accessibility compliance. The public areas of this project including: leasing center, leasing center parking areas, pedestrian walkways from the public right of way to the leasing center, public walks and driveway crossings, and any areas within that could be used by the “public”were reviewed for accessibility compliance to the 2010 ADA standards for accessibile design (2010 ADA) 2010 edition.Project Compliance:Public areas: 2010 ADA stdTenant common use areas: IBC 2018 & ANSI A117.1-2009Tenant covered dwelling units: IBC 2018/ANSI A117.1-2009Parking Calculation TableResidential Calculation count req/unit req. parking One-Bedroom Units:631.5 94.5Two-Bedroom Units:1012202Three-Bedroom Units:163 48Tri-Plex Units123 36 192380.5 residential subtotalCommercial Calculation SFreq/Xsf req. parking In-Door Seating Area800 1/50sf=16 x 50% reduction = 8Patio3001/100sf =3 x 50% reduction = 1.5Office31501/250sf =12.6 x 20% reduction = 10 19.5 commercial subtotal 400 combined subtotal-40 (10% bus reduction)-10 (2 Car Share Spaces)-2 (additional covered bike parking)Total Required Parking Stalls 348 12 Triplex garage spaces1 Covered Accessible spaces1 Covered Van Accessible spaces182 Covered Standard spaces Covered Parking Subtotal196 6 Accessible spaces 1 Van Accessible spaces 1 E.V. Van Accessible space 2 E.V. Spaces 2 Car Share Spaces46 Compact spaces (less than 25%) 158 Standard spaces Non-Covered Parking Subtotal 154Total On-site Parking Stalls 350348 Total Parking Spaces Required350 Total Parking Spaces ProvidedCovered Bike Parking Building A20 SpacesBuilding B38 SpacesBuilding C16 Spaces74 SpacesUncovered Bike Parking Building D8 SpacesBike Parking Total82 SpacesParcel & Site Coverage InformationZoning District: R-O Community Plan Designation: Urban NeighborhoodParcel Size: 8.638 acres / 376,271 SFNet Parcel Size: 7.632 acres / 332,456 SFNet Residential Density = 25.16 units/acre192 units/7.63 acres)Proposed Building Footprints: 62,665 SFpercentage of site: 16.65%Driveway circulation and parking areas: 114,636 SFpercentage of site: 30.47%Open space and landscape areas: 198,970 SF percentage of site: 52.88%Public street right-of-way: -0-SFpercentage of site: 0%Total Proposed Building Area:Building A - 50,701 GSFBuilding B -86,623 GSFBuilding C -65,146 GSFApartment Bldgs Subtotal202,470 GSF(4x) Triplex -22,892 GSFBldg. D -7,253 GSFSite Total GSF 232,615 GSFOpen Space TableResidential Calculation count req/unitreq. area One-Bedroom Units:63100/unit 6,300Two-Bedroom Units:101150/unit15,150Three-Bedroom Units:16150/unit 2,400Tri-PlexUnits:1210% Net SF/unit 2,02519225,875 SF totalOpen Space Area Provided100% can be shared GL outdoor space62,056100% can be private GL outdoor space 2,86850% can be balconies (max 12,000sf) 8,70850% can be common indoor rec area 2,008100% can be shared roof decks 5,707 81,347 SF providedWater Rights Information• There are no water rights for the property. • A Fee-in-Lieu agreement is proposed to meet city requirements.• The Cash-in-lieu Water Rights (CILWR) contribution must be paid to the City of Bozeman in full prior to final plan approval.Project InformationProject Name: Six Range Condominiums Project Address:4270 W Babcock St., Bozeman, MTLegal Description:MINOR SUB 338, S10, T02 S, R05 E, Lot A1Owner Paine GroupP.O. Box 418 Matt PaineBozeman, MT 59715Architect: MFGR Designs125 N. Wallace Ave.Sten Witmer, AIABozeman, MT 59715Civil Engineer Stahly Engineering851 Bridger Dr. Suite #1Kurt Thomson, PEBozeman, MT 59715Structural Engineer DCI Engineering; 1060 Fowler Ave. Suite 202Jeremy L. Ryan, PEBozeman, MT 59718Mechanical/Plumbing Engineer CDS Engineering; 7540 Churchill RoadCurt Smit, PEManhattan, MT 59741Electrical Engineer CDS Engineering 7540 Churchill RoadScottt Elders, PEManhattan, MT 59741Location/Vicinity MapSCALE:DRAWN:PROJECT NO:PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771DATE:12" = 1'-0"3/8/2022 2:07:50 PMA0.0020001Cover SheetSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTPROGESS -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION76 A3.01A3.01A3.01W Babcock St.Slough Creek Dr.S H anley A ve.Palisade Dr.Mill Creek Dr.S Ferguson Ave.20' - 0"Multi Family ResidentialMulti Family ResidentialExisting 9' Asphalt TrailPlayspace46' - 11"39'39'26'24'6'46'50' - 0"50' - 0"Park to the NorthTrash EnclosureTrash EnclosureTrash EnclosureRight-In, Right-OutFull Access ApproachFull Access ApproachFull Access ApproachSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSUnderground Power EasementExisting drainage feature running parallel to Ferguson.See Civil Drawings for more information.ELEC.Open Space48,150 sfOpen Space 7,550 sfOpen Space22,600 sfTrail FrontageOpen Space3,325 sfWATER SERVICE7'TTTTTTTIrrigation WellWell ControlsElec.Elec.24' - 0"Trash EnclosureTrash EnclosureTrash Enclosure60' - 0"24' - 0"LANDSCAPED24' - 6"A1.223Pedestrian Corridor10'-0" EasementA1.224Proposed Mailbox LocationCOVERED BIKE PKG. -20 SPACESCOVERED BIKE PKG. -10 SPACESCOVERED BIKE PKG. -28 SPACESBIKE PKG. -16 SPACESBIKE PKG. -8 SPACESLANDSCAPED230' - 0"L A N D S C A P E D252' - 1 0 "APPROX. STREAMLINE BUS STOP LOCATION-TYP. SHELTER -PROVIDED BY HRDC TO BE CONSTRUCTEDA1.211A1.224Sim.A1.224Sim.A1.224Sim.A1.224Sim.A1.224Sim.A1.21532' - 1"15' - 0"16' - 0"SSSS16' - 1"16' - 1"FENCED OPEN SPACE -320 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -315 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -352 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -320 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -315 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -352 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -320 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -315 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -352 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -320 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -315 SFFENCED OPEN SPACE -352 SF13' - 0"FHFHFHFHFHFHFHFHFH7'7' - 0"7'7' - 0"Setback15' - 0"Setback15' - 0"E.V. PARKING SPACECAR SHARE PARKING SPACE14A3.0123All Weather AccessGravelRollover CurbParking96' - 8"85' - 6"Landscaped109' - 8"Parking60' - 0"LANDSCAPED283' - 6"PARKING24' - 0"LANDSCAPED287' - 9"42' - 3"PARKING82' - 7"110' - 0"MIXED103' - 7"LANDSCAPED17' - 5"Parking60' - 0"Landscaped313' - 6"7'7'7'7'6'7'FHOpen SpaceBuilding FootprintSnow StorageSidewalk SetbackBuilding SetbackProperty LineSite Plan LegendCrosswalkUtility Setback-Bike Rack -86 SpotsParking:Total:350 Total Parking Spaces-See parking table on A0.01-TransformerT-Junction BoxJ-Dry Well-Charging StationCHCovered ParkingSCALE:DRAWN:PROJECT NO:PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771DATE:1" = 40'-0"5/16/2022 5:07:27 PMA1.0120001Overall Site PlanSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTBuilding Permit1" = 40'-0"1Site Plann77 SCALE:DRAWN:PROJECT NO:PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771DATE:3/8/2022 3:12:33 PMA1.2720001Material PalleteSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTPROGESS -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPainted Metal PanelPainted Metal RailingFiber Cement Shake SidingPainted Metal Balcony FasciaWood SoffitSteel PlanterPainted Metal CopingT&G Wood SoffitBrick CladdingPainted Steel BeamAluminum Storefront WindowBrick VeneerBlack Brick w/ Slate Gray MortarWood CladdingBalcony Soffit1x4 Cedar Slat T&GFiber Cementicious PanelJames Hardie-Hardie Shingle Siding -Straight Edge Panel -Color: Light Mist-Panel Size: 15.25" x 48"Exterior Window, Typ.Storefront, Typ.Full Lite Door, Typ.Metal PanelBlack Anodized AluminumPainted Cementitious PanelJames Hardie-Painted with Sherwin Williams Real RedGlulam Column w/ Steel BaseBalcony FasciaPlanter BoxesHot Rolled Steel, WaxedCast In Place Architectural ConcreteBoard Formed ConcretePainted Metal PanelAluminum Storefront WindowCast-in Place Architectural ConcretePainted Cementitious Panel78 2Transparency Calculation:33024 Total SF6852 Glazing SF20.75% GlazingMin Height = 2'-6"Max Height = 41'-6"Brick VeneerBlack Brick w/ Slate Gray MortarWood CladdingBalcony Soffit1x4 Cedar Slat T&GCementicious PanelJames Hardie-Hardie Shingle Siding -Straight Edge Panel -Color: Light Mist-Panel Size: 15.25" x 48"Exterior Window, Typ.Storefront, Typ.Full Lite Door, Typ.Black Anodized AluminumPainted Cementitious PanelJames Hardie-Painted with Sherwin Williams Real RedGlulam Column w/ Steel BaseBalcony FasciaPlanter BoxesHot Rolled Steel, WaxedCast In Place Architectural ConcreteBoard Formed ConcreteSCALE:DRAWN:PROJECT NO:PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771DATE:As indicated3/9/2022 11:40:59 AMA3.0120001Overall ElevationsSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTPROGESS -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1" = 40'-0"3East Elevation - Overall Site1" = 40'-0"1North Elevation - Overall Site1" = 40'-0"2South Elevation - Overall Site1" = 40'-0"4West Elevation - Overall Site279 TREESCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZEDROUGHT TOLERANTQTYMATURE HEIGHTMATURE WIDTH ACE LUS Acer platanoides 'Emerald Lustre' / Emerald Lustre Norway Maple 2" Cal. Yes 12 40 - 65' ht. 25 -40' w. ACE GRN Acer tataricum 'GarAnn' TM / Hot Wings Tatarian Maple 2" Cal. Yes 9 15 - 25' ht. 15 - 25' w. AES OHI Aesculus glabra / Ohio Buckeye 2" Cal. Yes 4 25 - 40' ht. 15 - 25' w. AME GRA Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' / Autumn Brilliance Apple Serviceberry 2" Cal. No 4 15 - 25' ht. 15 - 25' w. CRA TOB Crataegus x mordenensis 'Toba' / Toba Hawthorn 2" Cal. Yes 11 15 - 25' ht. 15 - 25' w. GLE SKY Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skyline' / Skyline Honey Locust 2" Cal. Yes 39 25 - 65' ht. 25 - 40' w. MAL TH2 Malus x adstringens 'Thunderchild' / Thunderchild Crabapple 2" Cal. Yes 4 15 - 25' ht. 15 - 25' w. PIN SYL Pinus sylvestris / Scotch Pine 8` Ht. Yes 9 40 - 65' ht. 25 - 40' w. POP DFL Populus tremuloides `KMN01` / Dancing Flame Quaking Aspen 2" Cal. No 113 25 - 40' ht. 10 - 15' w. SYR IVO Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk' / Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 2" Cal. Yes 10 15 - 25' ht. 10 - 15' w. TIL GSP Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' / Greenspire Littleleaf Linden 2" Cal. Yes 24 40 - 65' ht. 15 - 25' w. ULM PXN Ulmus x `Morton' / Accolade Elm 2" Cal. Yes 15 40 - 65' ht. 15 - 25' w.SHRUBSCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZEDROUGHT TOLERANTQTYMATURE HEIGHTMATURE WIDTH FOR MEA Forsythia x 'Meadowlark' / Meadowlark Forsythia 2 gal. Yes 53 6 - 10' ht. 3 - 6' w. JUN ME2 Juniperus scopulorum 'Medora' / Medora Juniper 2 gal. Yes 56 10 - 15' ht. 1 - 6' w. LIG VUL Ligustrum vulgare 'Cheyenne' / Cheyenne Privet 2 gal. Yes 43 6 - 10' ht. 3 - 6' w. PHY OPU Physocarpus opulifolius 'Dart's Gold' / Dart's Gold Ninebark 2 gal. Yes 7 3 - 6' ht. 3 - 6' w. PIN WH2 Pinus mugo 'White Bud' / White Bud Mugo Pine 2 gal. Yes 287 3 - 6' ht. 3 - 6' w. PRU PAW Prunus besseyi 'P011S' TM / Pawnee Buttes Sand Cherry 2 gal. Yes 19 6 - 18" ht. 3 - 6' w. RHU GRO Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low' / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 2 gal. Yes 172 18 - 36" ht. 3 - 6' w. RIB ALP Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 2 gal. Yes 130 18 - 36" ht. 3 - 6' w. SPI LIT Spiraea x bumalda 'Little Princess' / Little Princess Spirea 2 gal. Yes 48 6" - 36" ht. 1 - 6' w. SYR MIS Syringa patula 'Miss Kim' / Miss Kim Korean Lilac 2 gal. No 32 3 - 6' ht. 6 - 10' w.GRASSESCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZEDROUGHT TOLERANTQTYMATURE HEIGHTMATURE WIDTH CAL KAR Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' / Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 1 gal. Yes 311 6" - 6' ht. 1 -3' w. SPO HET Sporobolus heterolepis / Prairie Dropseed 1 gal. Yes 152 18 - 36" ht. 1 - 3' w.PERENNIALSCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZEDROUGHT TOLERANTQTYMATURE HEIGHTMATURE WIDTH ECH MAG Echinacea purpurea 'Magnus' / Magnus Purple Coneflower 1 gal. Yes 68 18 - 36" ht. 1 - 3' w. HOS SIE Hosta sieboldiana 'Elegans' / Elegans Plantain Lily 1 gal. No 75 18 - 36" ht. 1 - 6' w. LEU SCP Leucanthemum x superbum 'Snowcap' / Snowcap Shasta Daisy 1 gal. No 277 18 - 36" ht. < 1' w. NEP WAL Nepeta x faassenii 'Walkers Low' / Walkers Low Catmint 1 gal. Yes 54 6 - 18" ht. 1 - 3' w. PER ATR Perovskia atriplicifolia / Russian Sage 1 gal. No 85 18 - 36" ht. 1 - 3' w. SAL MA2 Salvia nemorosa 'May Night' / May Night Sage 1 gal. Yes 176 6" - 36" ht. 1 - 3' w. VER ROY Veronica spicata 'Royal Candles' / Royal Candles Spike Speedwell 1 gal. Yes 133 6 - 18" ht. 1 - 3' w.Rock Mulch Bed Areas Wildflower/Native Grass Blend Kentucky Bluegrass Sod Non-Irrigated Native Grass (Seed Planted)32,751 SF27,305 SF70,294 SF20,127 SFLANDSCAPE AREASW Babcock St.S Ferguson Ave.20' - 0"Existing 9' Asphalt TrailPlayspace47'39'7'5' - 0"50'50'Trash EnclosureTrash EnclosureTrash EnclosureRight-In, Right-OutFull Access ApproachFull Access ApproachFull Access ApproachSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOpen Space48,150 sfOpen Space 8,250 sfOpen Space22,600 sfTrail FrontageOpen Space2,325 sfMonument Sign -see 2/A3B1.1TTTTTTTIrrigation WellWell ControlsElec.24' - 0"Trash EnclosureTrash Enclosure60' - 0"24' - 0"96' - 8"85' - 10"109' - 4"60' - 0"LANDSCAPED283' - 6"PARKING24' - 0"LANDSCAPED287' - 9"PARKING124' - 9"LANDSCAPED110' - 3"MIXED103' - 4"LANDSCAPED17' - 5"LANDSCAPED24' - 6"PARKING67' - 0"LANDSCAPED306' - 6"FHFHFHFHFHFHFHFHFH35354343All Weather AccessGravelRollover CurbLight PoleCommercial Area13850 sfLANDSCAPE CALCULATIONSNo Open Area RequiredDrought Resistance CalcResistant Plants = 1803Non-resistant Plants = 582Total Plants = 238575.6% Drought ResistantSCALE:DRAWN:PROJECT NO:PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771DATE:1" = 40'-0"5/16/2022 4:33:39 PML1.0120001Landscape PlanSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTBuilding PermitnPARKING LOT LANDSCAPING-MANDATORY350 Total parking spotsRequired: 1 Large canopy tree, one large non canopy tree and 1 small tree, or 3 small ornamental trees for every 9 parking spaces provided (12 small trees, 43 large trees)Provided: 54 large canopy tree and all parking spaces are within 70' from the trunk of a large tree.Required: Any parking lot providing 15 or more parking spaces shall have a minimum of 20 square feet of landscape area within the parking lot. (350 x 20sf = 7,000 square feet)Provided: 9,746 sqft of parking lot landscaping.STREET FRONTAGE LANDSCAPINGOne large canopy for each 50' of total street frontage rounded to the nearest whole number. Required: Babcock 945' / 50 = 18.9 treesProvided: 19 large canopy spaced appropriately with vision triangles.Required: Ferguson 398' / 50 = 7.96 treesProvided: 8 large canopy trees spaced appropriately with vision triangles.Required: Neighbohrs to the South 950' / 50' = 19 trees of residential adjacency.Provided: 21 large canopy trees.SHEET INDEXL1.0 Overall Landscape PlanL2.0 Landscape Planting Plan WestL2.1 Landscape Planting Plan EastL2.2 Roof Deck LandscapeL3.0 Landscape Site DetailsL3.1 Landscape Site DetailsL3.2 Dumpster EnclosureL4.0 Irrigation Plan OverallPLANT SCHEDULE1" = 40'-0"1Overall Landscape Plan80 MAIN FLOOR100' -0"UPPER T.O. PLATE119' -7"MAIN T.O. PLATE109' -1 1/8"ABCDSECOND FLOOR110' -5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"1' - 4 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"2" / 12"D.1DDD.1D.1DD.2D.201EE.1F01AAA.1FE.1EAAA.101E.12" / 12"7" 12"12" 12"12" 12"7" 12"7" 12"12" 12"(T)(E)(T)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)FACADE TRANSPARENCYFACADE SF = 1,709FENESTRATION SF = 38022% TOTAL TRANSPARENCY2MAIN FLOOR100' -0"UPPER T.O. PLATE119' -7"MAIN T.O. PLATE109' -1 1/8"ABCDSECOND FLOOR110' -5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"1' - 4 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"02010909010209010212" 12"7" 12"12" 12"7" 12"12" 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"7" 12"(F) WHEN TAGGED ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS, INDICATES FROSTED GLAZING(T) WHEN TAGGED ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS, INDICATES TEMPERED SAFETY GLAZING REQUIRED(E) WHEN TAGGED ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS, INDICATES EGRESS OPERABILITY(WCOD) WHEN TAGGED ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS, INDICATES 4" WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICESAFETY GLAZINGPROVIDE TEMPERED GLAZING IN ALL IN ALL AREAS SUBJECT TO HUMANIMPACT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE 2018 IRC. FALL PROTECTIONALL WINDOWS INSTALLED WITH A SILL HT. BELOW 24" AND 6' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICE (WCOD)THAT DOES NOT OPEN MORE THAT4" INCHES.EGRESS AREASEGRESS OPENINGS IN SLEEPING AREAS REQUIRED TO MEET THE IRC 2018 SECTION R310. WHERE EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS ARE PROVIDED THEY SHALL HAVE NOT MORE THAN 44" SILL HEIGHT, MEASURED FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO BOTTOM EDGE OF CLEAR OPENING.MINIMUM OPENING AREA -5.7 SF. (R310.1.1)MINIMUM OPENING HEIGHT -24" CLEAR (R310.1.2)MINIMUM OPENING WIDTH -20" CLEAR (R310.1.3)WINDOW NOTESSCALE:DRAWN:PROJECT NO:PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771DATE:1/4" = 1'-0"3/11/2022 1:17:09 PMAT3.112001ElevationsSix Range TriplexPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Re-Submittal 2021.01.071/4" = 1'-0"1NORTH ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"2SOUTH ELEVATION81 A1-1A1-2A1-4A1-5A1-6A1-7A1-8A1-9A1-10A1-11A1-12A1-13A1-14A1-15A1-16A1-3AS2 ROOF143' -6"AS2 4133' -6"AS2 3123' -6"AS2 2113' -6"AS2 1102' -6"AS1 Roof135' -6"AS1 3125' -0"AS1 2115' -0"AS1 1105' -0"AS2 099' -6"AS2 1.5103' -6"Mech. ScreeningCementitious ShakeMetal RailingMetal PanelStorefrontMetal Guardrail w/ Vertical Ballutrades. Spacing to be less than 4" o.c. Finish per Specifications.Cementitious Shake. Manufacturer and color per specifications.Vertical Wood Composite Siding. Manufacturer and color per specificaitons7/8" Corrugated Steel -24 GaStore Front Assembly. Manufacturer per SpecificaitonsStorefront Door Head With CloserMetal Panel Siding. Manufacturer and color per specifications.Standard Brick -1/2" Joint. Manufacturer and color per SpecificaitonsAS ELEV PIT101' -0"A1-1A1-2A1-4A1-5A1-6A1-7A1-8A1-9A1-10A1-11A1-12A1-13A1-14A1-15A1-16A1-3AS2 ROOF143' -6"AS2 4133' -6"AS2 3123' -6"AS2 2113' -6"AS2 1102' -6"AS1 Roof135' -6"AS1 3125' -0"AS1 2115' -0"AS1 1105' -0"AS2 099' -6"AS2 1.5103' -6"AS ELEV PIT101' -0"5' - 0"3' - 3"2' - 11 3/4"SCALE:DRAWN:PROJECT NO:PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771DATE:1" = 10'-0"3/9/2022 12:54:58 PMAA3.0120001Overall Elevations -BuildingASix Range CondominiumsBuilding X -XXXX Set -XX/XX/XXXXPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MT1" = 10'-0"2West Elevation1" = 10'-0"1East Elevation82 Cementitious Shake Metal Panel Storefront GluLam Column w/ Steel Base Mech. Screening Metal Railing Transparency Calculation: 2450 Total SF 582 Glazing SF 23.75% Glazing Min Height = 0'-0" Max Height = 42'-4" Mech. Screening Wood Cladding Metal Railing Storefront Metal Panel Brick Veneer Concrete Screening Wall GluLam Column w/ Steel Base Metal Panel Storefront SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE: As indicated 4/27/2022 3:48:13 PM AB4.01 20001 Overall ElevationsSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTPROGRESS SET -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1" = 20'-0"1 Overall North Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"2 Overall South Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"3 Overall East Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"4 Overall West Elevation 83 Mech. Screening Metal Railing Cementitious Panel GluLam Column w/ Steel Base Brick VeneerConcrete Screening WallMetal Panel Wood Cladding Storefront Storefront Street Frontage Transparency Calculation: 2158 Total SF 479 Glazing SF 22.19% Glazing Min Height = 2'-6" Max Height = 29'-0" Cementitious Shake. Manufacturer and color per specifications. SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 4/27/2022 3:29:47 PM AC4.11 20001 Overall ElevationsSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Re-Submittal 2021.12.081/16" = 1'-0"1 CS2 East Overall 1/16" = 1'-0"2 CS2 West Overall 1/16" = 1'-0"3 CS1 North Overall 1/16" = 1'-0"4 CS2 South Overall 84 Level 1 0' -0" Level 2 14' -0" D ROOF 24' -0"14' - 0"10' - 0"26' - 3 1/2"34' - 3 1/2"Level 1 0' -0" Level 2 14' -0" D ROOF 24' -0" Level 1 0' -0" Level 2 14' -0" D ROOF 24' -0"10' - 0"14' - 0"19' - 6"26' - 3 1/2"34' - 3 1/2"Level 1 0' -0" Level 2 14' -0" D ROOF 24' -0" SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12/8/2021 7:11:34 PM AD3.01 Project Number Exterior Elevations -Building D Six Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Re-Submittal 2021.12.081/8" = 1'-0"2 North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"4 East Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"1 South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"3 West Elevation 85 SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE:1/7/2022 11:02:23 AM A9.01 20001 Graphics -BLDG ASix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Resubmittal 2021.01.0786 SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE:1/7/2022 11:02:29 AM A9.06 20001 Graphics -BLDG BSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Resubmittal 2021.01.0787 SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE:1/7/2022 11:02:31 AM A9.08 20001 Graphics -BLDG BSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Resubmittal 2021.01.0788 SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE:1/7/2022 11:02:34 AM A9.10 20001 Graphics -BLDG BSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Resubmittal 2021.01.0789 SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE:1/7/2022 11:02:38 AM A9.13 20001 Graphics -BLDG CSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Resubmittal 2021.01.0790 SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE:1/7/2022 11:02:43 AM A9.17 20001 Graphics -BLDG DSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Resubmittal 2021.01.0791 SCALE: DRAWN: PROJECT NO: PO box 1001 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE:1/7/2022 11:02:48 AM A9.21 20001 Graphics -Tri-PlexSix Range CondominiumsPaine Group4270 W Babcock Street, Bozeman MTDRC Site Plan Resubmittal 2021.01.0792 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Anna Bentley, Community Development Director SUBJECT:Calendar Year 2021 Land Use Inventory MEETING DATE:July 18, 2022 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Plan/Report/Study RECOMMENDATION:Receive information. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.1 Informed Conversation on Growth: Continue developing an in-depth understanding of how Bozeman is growing and changing and proactively address change in a balanced and coordinated manner. BACKGROUND:The City prepares an annual land use inventory. The annual updates include newly annexed areas, zone map amendments, and changes in land use based on building permits, subdivisions, and other development activity. The annual report covers one calendar year. The inventory is part of the City's land management approach to provide reasonably current and relevant data on community land resources and availability. The report provides data for the past 10 years. The inventory describes each land use and identifies how much of each zoning district and the city as a whole are used for that activity. The document is provided to the public through the City's Community Development Department website. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:None FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: CY2021 Land Use Report.pdf Report compiled on: July 13, 2022 93 2021 Land Use Inventory Report 94 Summary The City of Bozeman Department of Community Development (DPCD) prepares an annual report of land use within the City. The report cross tabulates how the area within each parcel and within each zoning district is used. Use is measured in acres. Any established use on the site means the area of the entire parcel shows as occupied. All use and area values are rounded to the nearest tenth of an acre. Shown in the following tables is the updated land use inventory for the City of Bozeman from December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2021. A small map is included at the end of the report. The current land use information for individual parcels is available through the interactive geographic information system hosted on the City’s website, www.bozeman.net. The land use classifications and zoning definitions are described below. Zoning districts are established by the City Commission through the adoption of ordinances. The description of land use classifications is prepared by the Department of Community Development. A revised set of classifications was prepared in 2010 and appear in all data tables. The changes were generally minor but refined several classifications and added several to allow the same classifications to be used either inside or outside the city. In 2016, two new zoning districts were created and added to the 2016 data table. Some large zoning map amendments transferred land to the new districts. The descriptor shown in parentheses in the list of land use classifications is the value contained in the geographic information system tables used to track the inventory. The descriptors are used in the table row labels due to space constraints. The detailed description of uses allowed in the zoning districts and related development standards are available through the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. Please contact the Department of Community Development if you have questions on this information. 95 Use Type Description (MIXED) Mixed Use More than one principal use occurring on one lot. (RB) Restaurant/Bar A restaurant, coffee shop, cafeteria, grill, short order café, luncheonette, sandwich stand, drugstore, soda fountain, serving food; or an establishment where alcoholic beverages are served on premises. (CR) Commercial Retail sales, services, Banks Uses involving the sale of goods or services carried out for profit. (HM) Hotel/Motel A building or group of buildings, in which lodging is provided and offered to transient guests for compensation (not to include a boarding house, lodging house or rooming house)> (CA) Commercial Auto sales, rental, parts, storage, gas, service Establishments primarily engaged in automotive related sale/services, fuels, repair, sales, washing, rental and leasing. (AP) Administrative Professional An establishment in which overall management functions occur and/or in which a recognized profession is maintained for the conduct of that profession. (LM) Light Manufacturing Fabrication of and/or assembly of goods from previously prepared materials, to include storage, and mini-warehousing. (HI) Heavy Industrial Those industries whose processing of products results in the emission of any atmospheric pollution, light flashes, glare, odor, noise or vibration which may be heard and/or felt off the premises and those industries which constitute a fire or explosion hazard. 96 Use Type Description (GOLF) Golf Course A tract of land laid out for playing golf with at least nine holes; and improved with tees, greens, fairways and hazards; and which may include a clubhouse and/or shelter. (POS) Park or Open Space Parks, trails, recreational areas and other places that are capable of being used by the public for recreation, relaxation and social purposes. May include private land serving a property owners association for similar purposes (AG) Agricultural Land, usually 20 acres or greater, without dwellings (AGR) Agricultural Land, usually 20 acres or greater, with one or more dwellings (CE) Conservation Easement A property legally restricted from development for the purpose of preserving open space or habitat. May or may not have a dwelling or other uses on the property. (CHURCH) Church A building where persons regularly assemble for religious worship and which, together with its accessory buildings and uses, is maintained and controlled by a religious body organized to sustain public worship. (PFP) Public Facility A building, structure, facility or complex, used by or providing services to the general public and constructed by either the federal, state, county or municipal government agency. Also includes utilities serving the general public such as electrical service. (SEF) School/Educational Facility Any building or part thereof which is constructed or used for public or private education or instruction; when not conducted as a commercial enterprise for the profit of individual owners or stockholders. 97 Use Type Description (SFR) Single- Household Residential A building used for residential occupancy by one household, including multiple residences that share a common wall, as long as only one dwelling unit lies upon a single lot; townhomes. Also may include an accessory dwelling unit. (DTR) Duplex/Triplex Residential A building, or a portion thereof, used for occupancy by two or three households living independently of each other, with the units completely separated by a common wall, floor and/or ceiling and reside on one lot; including apartments and condos. (MFR) Multi-Household Residential A building, or portion thereof, used for occupancy by four or more households living independently of each other, with the units completely separated by a common wall, floor and/or ceiling; apartments, condos. (MHMP) Mobile Home, Mobile Park, Manufactured Housing A factory assembled structure(s), exceeding eight feet in width, originally equipped with the necessary service connections and originally made so as to be readily movable as a unit(s) on its own running gear and designed to be used as a dwelling unit(s) without a permanent foundation, whether or not the running gear has been removed. (RP) Residential with Pasture Residential property, usually single-household, with 1 or more acres but not more than 20 acres, that has open pasture used for grazing animals. (RR) Rural Residential Detached single-household residential property located outside of the City limits that does not have pasture. (ROW) Rights-of-Way A public way established or dedicated for public purposes by duly recorded plat, deed, grant, easement, governmental authority or by operation of law; roads; railroads. (UDV) Undeveloped Land that is not ready to be occupied by buildings (needs to be subdivided; needs infrastructure) 98 Use Type Description (VACANT) Vacant Land that is currently developed and ready to be occupied by buildings but is unoccupied; no buildings or buildings requiring significant improvement in order to be used. Zoning Districts by Acronym and Full Title R-S - Residential suburban district R-1 - Residential single household, low density district R-2 - Residential two household, medium density district R-3 - Residential medium density district R-4 - Residential high density district R-5 – Residential mixed-use high density district (first appears on the zoning map in 2016) R-O - Residential office district RMH -Residential manufactured home community district REMU- Residential emphasis mixed use district (first appears on the zoning map in 2010) HMU - Historic mixed use district PLI - Public lands and institutions B-1 - Neighborhood business district B-2 - Community business district B-2M – Community business district – mixed (first appears on the zoning map in 2016) B-3 - Central business district M-1 - Light manufacturing district M-2 - Manufacturing and industrial district B-P - Business park district UMU - Urban Mixed Use (first appears on the zoning map in 2008) 99 2021 Land use Inventory Report including data up through Dec 31, 2021, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts B-1 B-2 B-2M B-3 BP M-1 M-2 NEHMU PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU Grand Total % by Land Use AP 8.0 39.9 9.7 15.7 40.5 11.2 4.8 50.7 5.8 1.3 7.9 15.6 3.2 33.9 248.1 1.8% CA 12.0 54.8 9.4 2.8 1.2 40.3 4.7 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.1 5.2 0.1 1.5 1.6 134.6 1.0% CHURCH 0.4 3.9 4.2 3.7 6.7 11.1 24.0 17.5 21.4 1.5 94.4 0.7% CR 7.1 188.5 19.6 16.9 16.0 82.8 49.8 3.4 16.1 3.9 1.2 32.7 5.0 59.6 502.5 3.7% DTR 0.1 0.6 2.7 1.4 0.5 0.3 1.7 39.6 126.4 109.2 24.9 35.1 2.1 344.7 2.6% GOLF 108.6 48.6 5.0 15.8 178.0 1.3% HM 2.7 55.2 8.5 1.9 6.2 1.9 0.8 1.5 0.1 0.2 1.8 80.6 0.6% LM 13.2 3.6 1.8 267.9 53.5 8.2 1.4 7.5 2.5 0.4 0.9 0.4 361.2 2.7% MFR 10.9 75.0 2.7 6.4 1.5 5.2 39.7 46.0 55.2 230.4 168.2 12.9 26.0 78.2 12.0 770.3 5.7% MHMP 14.0 10.1 3.1 2.0 12.3 9.8 34.2 0.1 1.8 87.3 0.6% MIXED 26.9 38.6 7.2 17.4 1.2 57.4 16.2 4.9 20.9 11.2 6.7 22.0 62.3 46.3 2.8 0.2 342.1 2.5% PFP 1.1 7.8 9.6 3.9 9.8 10.4 0.2 451.9 0.1 3.0 7.8 0.4 7.2 513.1 3.8% POS 1.9 46.1 1.5 0.2 19.3 14.8 37.5 227.0 326.6 190.8 260.7 91.4 13.1 12.2 2.0 99.0 173.4 1,517.6 11.3% RB 2.5 28.3 10.1 3.1 0.2 1.9 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.9 48.4 0.4% ROW 58.0 142.1 14.5 8.1 80.7 71.5 170. 2 29.2 515.8 421.8 191.4 263.2 268.7 5.3 1.1 55.4 72.0 125. 3 2.6 2,496.9 18.6% RR 61.0 2.3 2.0 65.3 0.5% SEF 1.2 41.1 6.7 62.0 251.9 21.5 4.5 223.0 232.1 2.8 36.5 27.0 910.4 6.8% SFR 5.3 10.6 5.3 5.3 12.4 13.2 9.9 3.5 812.6 327.7 550.4 139.1 2.4 1.1 4.2 17.7 127. 7 2,048.4 15.2% UDV 15.3 20.3 7.8 160. 4 64.9 21.2 83.4 44.3 362.6 276.7 6.0 44.7 456. 1 2.2 1,565.7 11.7% VACANT 3.1 183.5 91.9 0.5 17.1 94.3 38.6 1.3 48.8 123.2 149.6 96.3 52.5 63.0 64.2 5.0 35.9 28.2 31.6 1,128.8 8.4% Grand Total 156. 1 959.6 194. 7 101. 7 243. 6 850. 8 465. 5 58.5 1,766. 2 1,967. 4 1,117. 9 2,249. 2 1,372. 7 105. 6 104.5 226. 6 936. 5 526. 9 34.2 13,438. 4 100.0% % by Zoning District 1.2% 7.1% 1.4% 0.8% 1.8% 6.3% 3.5% 0.4% 13.1% 14.6% 8.3% 16.7% 10.2% 0.8% 0.8% 1.7% 7.0% 3.9% 0.3% 100.0% 100 2020 Land use Inventory Report including data up through Dec 31, 2020, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classifications Zoning Districts B-1 B-2 B-2M B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU Grand Total % by Land Use AP 3.7 81.3 11.8 17.0 49.9 12.9 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.9 5.6 59.0 244.8 1.8% CA 7.8 47.4 10.7 3.1 1.2 50.1 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.0 3.0 0.7 126.1 0.9% CHURCH 4.9 0.5 4.1 6.7 11.0 32.0 11.8 21.4 0.5 1.5 94.4 0.7% CR 8.9 296.9 22.4 18.3 21.5 87.8 8.6 3.4 9.2 1.6 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.9 18.9 1.0 500.3 3.7% DTR 0.3 0.3 2.8 1.8 0.5 0.1 0.0 40.0 111.4 119.9 24.2 35.5 1.8 338.6 2.5% GOLF 5.0 173.0 178.0 1.3% HM 2.7 62.1 8.5 1.9 4.0 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.2 80.6 0.6% LM 3.3 3.6 3.7 5.3 290. 5 33.2 8.8 0.7 0.9 7.5 357.6 2.7% MFR 1.7 33.9 2.4 6.5 1.5 0.0 36.9 38.0 262.6 197. 9 8.0 26.0 146. 1 2.3 763.9 5.7% MHMP 1.3 10.1 2.1 12.2 34.2 22.6 4.8 87.3 0.7% MIXED 19.0 93.8 14.3 19.0 1.2 61.2 9.6 4.6 0.3 1.9 8.5 22.7 0.0 8.9 19.6 284.6 2.1% PFP 0.4 9.7 9.6 33.9 0.8 0.2 451.2 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 513.2 3.8% POS 0.5 41.3 0.2 0.2 17.5 28.2 5.0 504.6 285.0 51.1 298.7 112. 9 14.4 3.8 15.4 111. 8 1490.7 11.1% RB 1.7 29.1 10.9 3.1 0.2 3.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 48.4 0.4% ROW 13.6 216.6 44.2 48.8 30.1 225. 7 356. 6 10.9 137.3 375.5 199. 8 467.1 139. 7 9.0 10.2 4.3 67.2 84.6 6.5 2447.7 18.3% RR 0.5 29.1 1.8 36.3 67.7 0.5% SEF 0.8 6.7 42.5 754.5 30.3 4.5 36.8 3.9 25.8 1.2 0.5 907.5 6.8% SFR 2.5 6.3 4.6 6.4 12.4 4.6 9.1 5.9 817.5 319.5 559.3 137.4 5.3 7.6 109.1 2007.4 15.0% UDV 0.4 226.2 29.4 0.0 32.4 46.1 149.0 224.8 182.1 59.1 155.3 110.9 6.0 128.7 33.5 17.8 387.9 1789.7 13.4% VACANT 9.3 199.9 19.7 0.9 27.1 95.6 1.3 1.6 2.3 40.4 18.5 124.3 109.5 87.0 206.8 81.5 16.0 31.6 1073.6 8.0% Grand Total 72.6 1345.8 185.9 151.2 240.1 962.2 572.8 39.9 2090.1 1852.8 816.2 2077.7 884.9 116.2 386.1 123.1 488.3 957.8 38.1 13402.0 100.0% % by Zoning District 0.5% 10.0% 1.4% 1.1% 1.8% 7.2% 4.3% 0.3% 15.6% 13.8% 6.1% 15.5% 6.6% 0.9% 2.9% 0.9% 3.6% 7.1% 0.3% 100.0% 101 2019 Land use Inventory Report including data up through July 31, 2020, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classifications Zoning Districts B-1 B-2 B-2M B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-S R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 REMU R- MH R-O UMU Grand Total % by Land Use AP 3.7 81.3 12.1 15.4 49.9 12.9 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.3 5.6 58.6 243.4 1.8% CA 7.8 45.4 10.7 3.1 1.2 50.2 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.0 3.0 0.7 124.3 0.9% CHURCH 18.5 0.5 4.1 1.5 6.7 11.0 30.0 11.8 21.4 0.5 106.1 0.8% CR 8.9 292.5 31.9 18.3 21.5 87.8 8.6 3.4 9.2 1.0 1.6 0.5 2.2 0.3 0.9 18.9 507.6 3.8% DTR 0.3 2.8 1.8 0.5 0.1 1.8 39.6 108.9 116.3 24.0 35.5 331.7 2.5% GOLF 173.0 5.0 178.0 1.3% HM 2.7 62.1 8.5 1.9 4.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 80.5 0.6% LM 3.3 3.6 4.6 5.3 290.5 33.8 8.8 7.5 0.7 0.9 358.9 2.7% MFR 1.7 21.2 2.4 6.5 1.5 0.0 2.3 37.7 38.0 266.2 195.8 45.7 26.0 134.3 779.4 5.8% MHMP 1.3 10.1 4.8 2.1 12.2 34.2 22.6 87.3 0.7% MIXED 19.0 95.5 14.3 18.2 1.2 61.2 9.6 4.6 2.1 19.6 0.3 1.9 8.5 13.4 0.0 8.9 278.2 2.1% PFP 0.4 10.8 9.6 33.8 0.8 0.2 451.2 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.4 514.2 3.8% POS 0.5 31.6 0.2 0.2 17.5 11.6 5.0 499.7 111.8 275.9 47.5 295.1 114.8 14.4 3.8 15.4 1445.0 10.8% RB 1.7 29.1 10.6 3.1 0.2 3.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 48.1 0.4% ROW 13.6 215.8 44.2 48.8 30.1 222.8 355.2 10.9 143.5 84.6 376.0 198.4 452.5 139.8 9.0 10.2 4.3 66.9 6.5 2433.0 18.2% RR 0.5 36.3 29.1 1.8 67.7 0.5% SEF 0.8 6.7 42.5 751.1 0.5 30.3 4.5 29.6 3.9 25.8 1.2 897.0 6.7% SFR 2.5 6.3 4.6 6.4 12.4 4.6 9.1 7.2 108.8 815.0 318.9 548.0 136.5 5.5 7.6 1993.4 14.9% UDV 0.4 234.4 30.2 0.0 32.4 62.1 149.0 230.1 373.7 190.3 67.8 179.3 111.0 6.0 248.2 33.5 38.3 1986.7 14.8% VACANT 9.3 203.7 10.2 1.3 27.1 95.4 1.3 1.6 2.1 16.3 41.7 18.1 129.1 122.0 49.1 86.5 72.8 31.6 919.4 6.9% Grand Total 72.6 1343.2 186.8 151.2 240.1 958.4 571.9 39.9 2,096.7 943.5 1,851.7 816.2 2,070.3 886.9 116.2 385.2 123.1 487.6 38.1 13,379.7 100.0% % by Zoning District 0.5% 10.0% 1.4% 1.1% 1.8% 7.2% 4.3% 0.3% 15.7% 7.1% 13.8% 6.1% 15.5% 6.6% 0.9% 2.9% 0.9% 3.6% 0.3% 100.0% 102 2018 Land use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2018, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classifications Zoning Districts B-1 B-2 B-2M B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU Grand Total % by Land Use AP 3.7 81.3 11.4 14.9 49.9 12.9 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.3 5.3 58.0 241.4 1.8% CA 7.8 45.9 11.3 2.9 1.2 0.2 50.2 1.5 0.4 0.0 3.2 0.7 125.3 1.0% CHURCH 18.5 0.5 3.9 6.7 11.3 30.0 11.8 21.4 0.5 1.5 106.2 0.8% CR 9.6 279.6 31.6 18.8 21.5 3.4 88.7 8.6 14.8 1.6 0.5 5.7 0.3 11.3 18.9 1.0 516.0 3.9% DTR 0.3 2.8 2.3 0.1 0.5 39.1 103.3 116.7 23.8 0.2 35.5 0.6 325.2 2.5% GOLF 5.0 173.0 178.0 1.4% HM 2.7 82.2 8.5 1.9 0.8 4.0 0.3 0.2 100.7 0.8% LM 3.6 3.6 4.6 5.3 8.8 290.5 33.8 0.3 0.7 2.9 7.5 361.6 2.8% MFR 1.7 18.6 2.4 6.9 1.5 0.0 37.6 37.7 251.3 179.7 40.7 26.0 112.8 2.3 719.2 5.5% MHMP 1.3 1.1 10.1 2.1 12.7 34.2 22.6 4.8 88.9 0.7% MIXED 18.3 88.9 13.3 17.2 1.2 4.6 61.2 9.6 2.1 0.3 1.9 8.5 13.4 0.0 8.9 19.6 268.9 2.1% PFP 0.4 10.8 9.6 0.2 33.8 0.8 451.6 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 514.6 3.9% POS 0.5 29.3 0.2 0.2 17.5 10.4 5.0 499.5 274.8 47.4 288.4 112.2 14.4 3.8 14.6 117.0 1435.3 11.0% RB 1.7 28.8 12.1 3.1 0.2 0.1 1.7 0.0 47.8 0.4% ROW 14.1 207.9 44.0 48.5 32.3 10.9 213.5 355.4 138.1 373.6 199.1 449.4 136.0 8.7 8.8 4.3 65.3 84.6 6.5 2401.1 18.3% RR 0.5 29.6 0.4 1.8 50.6 82.8 0.6% SEF 0.8 6.7 42.5 751.1 30.3 4.7 29.7 3.9 25.8 1.2 0.5 897.3 6.8% SFR 2.5 7.8 4.4 7.0 9.1 12.4 4.6 7.2 806.0 321.4 529.8 138.1 5.5 8.2 109.5 1973.5 15.1% UDV 0.4 194.7 91.6 137.7 148.8 230.1 200.0 68.0 187.9 129.5 6.0 33.5 111.9 373.7 1913.7 14.6% VACANT 13.7 205.0 9.2 0.7 7.8 1.6 30.8 1.3 2.4 44.2 22.5 144.3 126.7 42.9 86.5 19.1 11.7 31.6 802.1 6.1% Grand Total 77.5 1294.7 156.5 150.4 282.2 39.9 958.5 571.9 2097.5 1851.2 818.4 2056.2 888.8 115.4 135.6 123.1 485.6 957.7 38.1 13099.5 100.0% % by Zoning District 0.6% 9.9% 1.2% 1.1% 2.2% 0.3% 7.3% 4.4% 16.0% 14.1% 6.2% 15.7% 6.8% 0.9% 1.0% 0.9% 3.7% 7.3% 0.3% 100.0% 103 2017 Land use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2017, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District B-1 B-2 B-2M B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU Grand Total % by Land Use AP 3.7 78.4 9.0 15.3 50.0 9.5 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.3 5.3 55.3 230.6 1.8% CA 7.8 59.3 11.5 3.1 1.2 0.2 48.3 1.5 0.4 0.0 0.8 3.3 1.4 138.8 1.1% CHURCH 18.5 0.5 3.9 6.7 11.2 30.0 11.8 21.4 0.5 1.5 106.1 0.8% CR 9.6 255.0 30.3 18.8 27.3 3.4 88.7 8.6 9.2 2.1 0.5 5.7 0.3 11.3 22.0 1.0 493.9 3.8% DTR 0.3 2.8 2.3 0.1 0.5 39.5 99.1 112.6 23.1 0.2 35.4 0.6 316.4 2.4% GOLF 5.0 173.0 178.0 1.4% HM 2.7 83.3 8.5 1.7 0.8 3.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 101.3 0.8% LM 3.6 3.6 4.6 5.3 8.8 293.6 33.8 0.3 0.7 2.9 7.5 364.7 2.8% MFR 1.7 18.1 2.4 5.9 1.5 0.0 35.0 32.3 236.8 171.8 40.7 26.0 90.2 2.3 664.8 5.1% MHMP 1.3 1.1 10.1 2.1 12.7 34.2 22.6 4.8 88.9 0.7% MIXED 18.3 89.3 10.0 17.2 1.2 4.6 55.9 9.6 2.1 0.3 1.9 8.5 13.4 0.0 11.3 19.6 263.1 2.0% PFP 0.4 10.8 9.6 0.2 28.8 0.8 411.8 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 469.8 3.6% POS 0.5 33.3 0.3 0.2 10.9 10.7 5.0 523.0 268.4 59.3 276.2 111.7 14.4 3.8 10.4 116.9 1445.1 11.2% RB 1.7 29.9 11.8 3.1 0.2 0.1 1.7 0.0 48.6 0.4% ROW 14.1 207.9 41.4 48.5 33.5 10.9 206.9 355.5 137.5 372.9 195.8 429.0 128.4 7.5 8.8 4.3 63.6 84.9 6.5 2357.9 18.2% RR 0.5 29.1 1.8 33.9 65.3 0.5% SEF 0.8 6.7 42.5 5.0 714.6 30.5 4.7 29.5 3.9 25.8 1.2 0.5 865.7 6.7% SFR 2.5 24.6 4.0 7.5 9.1 12.5 4.6 7.2 787.4 327.7 505.4 142.6 5.5 16.0 109.6 1966.2 15.2% UDV 0.4 195.7 90.4 72.6 148.8 233.4 210.3 76.5 242.3 162.1 6.0 33.5 97.7 373.7 1943.4 15.0% VACANT 13.7 197.1 3.8 0.8 8.5 1.6 36.1 1.3 6.1 47.5 20.9 177.2 114.4 38.7 82.3 35.7 29.9 31.6 847.0 6.5% Grand Total 77.5 1296.3 141.1 150.4 282.2 39.9 884.6 572.0 2045.4 1837.3 830.8 2068.0 897.1 109.9 131.4 123.1 470.7 959.7 38.1 12955.6 100.0% % by Zoning District 0.6%10.0%1.1%1.2%2.2%0.3%6.8%4.4%15.8%14.2%6.4%16.0%6.9%0.8%1.0%1.0%3.6%7.4%0.3%100.0%Land Use ClassificationsZoning Districts 104 2016 Land use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2016, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District 105 2015 Land use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2015, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land use Classifications Zoning Districts B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU Grand Total % by Land Use AP 3.7 48.2 14.5 79.8 16.0 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.4 4.3 34.3 204.8 1.6% CA 3.1 53.3 2.8 12.4 0.2 46.2 1.5 0.0 0.4 1.9 0.7 122.6 1.0% CHURCH 19.0 3.9 0.0 6.7 11.2 31.0 10.9 21.4 0.5 1.5 106.1 0.8% CR 9.6 276.4 18.8 25.1 3.4 84.1 7.8 7.9 2.1 0.5 6.6 16.5 0.0 20.7 1.0 480.6 3.7% DTR 0.3 2.8 2.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 39.2 99.1 95.1 23.3 33.2 0.6 296.3 2.3% GOLF 5.0 0.0 173.0 178.0 1.4% HM 2.7 91.7 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 97.4 0.8% LM 10.9 1.2 5.3 9.0 289.7 33.8 0.7 0.7 4.0 7.5 362.7 2.8% MFR 0.0 18.5 5.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 35.0 32.3 257.4 166.0 10.5 81.7 2.3 611.2 4.7% MHMP 2.3 10.1 0.0 12.7 34.2 22.6 4.8 86.8 0.7% MIXED 18.3 97.4 15.8 1.2 4.6 55.9 9.6 2.0 0.3 1.9 8.5 13.4 0.0 11.3 19.6 259.7 2.0% PFP 2.2 10.5 9.6 0.2 19.9 0.8 396.5 0.0 6.6 4.0 0.0 450.4 3.5% POS 0.7 50.0 0.3 17.0 30.0 14.6 464.6 262.3 51.0 256.1 118.9 3.8 30.9 116.9 1417.1 11.0% RB 1.7 40.8 1.5 0.2 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 0.4% ROW 14.2 235.9 45.1 47.1 10.9 206.5 345.4 133.5 361.6 193.7 400.4 130.5 2.6 4.3 62.5 84.9 6.5 2285.7 17.7% SEF 0.0 0.8 6.7 42.5 5.0 712.4 30.2 4.7 31.6 3.3 25.8 1.2 0.5 864.6 6.7% SFR 2.8 28.8 7.4 0.0 9.0 12.9 4.6 7.2 747.0 320.3 428.6 142.0 19.4 105.4 1835.2 14.2% UDV 4.8 192.3 90.5 63.1 148.8 200.8 273.5 85.9 246.1 144.0 108.5 33.5 97.7 405.5 2094.9 16.2% VACANT 15.4 216.5 0.6 12.1 1.6 50.6 2.2 84.0 78.0 28.4 343.1 144.2 6.3 47.0 36.2 31.6 1097.7 8.5% Grand Total 77.3 1387.8 138.7 344.3 39.9 892.3 571.5 2008.9 1841.4 829.9 2118.7 926.7 127.9 123.1 471.7 959.7 38.1 12898.0 100.0% % by Zoning District 0.6% 10.8% 1.1% 2.7% 0.3% 6.9% 4.4% 15.6% 14.3% 6.4% 16.4% 7.2% 1.0% 1.0% 3.7% 7.4% 0.3% 100.0% 106 2014 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2014, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District 107 2013 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2013, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District 108 2012 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2012, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District 109 2011 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2011, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District 110 111 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Anna Bentley, Community Development Interim Director SUBJECT:Upcoming Items Expected for August 1, 2022 Community Development Board Meeting. MEETING DATE:July 18, 2022 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:No action required. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:The following project review items are presently scheduled for the August 1, 2022 Community Development Board meeting. 1. Review of text amendment 22133 to replace Division 38.380, Affordable Housing, and associated edits to other portions of the municipal code. 2. Gran Cielo Phase 2 Zone Map Amendment, NW of S. 27th and Cielo Way, Application 22117 3. Heritage Christian School Annexation Zone Map Amendment, 4310 Durston Road, Application 22170 4. Block 104 Zone Map Amendment, SE of Wallace and Tamarack, Application 22100 5. S. 8th Zone Map Amendment, 116 S. 8th Ave, Application 22077 6. 6730 Davis Lane Annexation Zone Map Amendment, 22020 7. University Crossing Site Plan, Concept Review (consent), SW of Kagy and S. 19th Ave, Application 21327 UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:None. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Report compiled on: July 13, 2022 112