Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-05-22 Public Comment - D. Egnatz - Protest on Canyon Gate Covenant approvalFrom:Diane Sheehan Egnatz To:Agenda Subject:Protest on Canyon Gate Covenant approval Date:Saturday, March 5, 2022 10:16:44 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mr. Mihelich, Mayor Andrus, City Commissioners, and Mr. Sullivan, I am writing to protest the language which was approved in the Consent Item F.4 Final Adoption of the Canyon Gate Annexation Agreement. The wording does not conform to what the Commissioners approved when voting on January 11, 2022. It was clarified several times during the Jan 11th meeting that the maximum height would be limited to 50ft throughout the development, not 50ft or 4 stories, whichever is greater. While it might seem like a minor change, this “update” allows for a much different development than the city commission approved. The vote on Jan. 11th was legally binding and the subsequent documentation needs to reflect that vote. I respectfully request that the city commission correct this immediately. Thank you, Diane Sheehan Egnatz 1268 Boylan Rd Bozeman, MT 59715 Please see below for evidence in support of this protest: The applicant’s proposed Annexation Agreement submitted Dec. 21, 2021 proposed a height limit of “50 feet or 4 stories, which is greater” within the R-5 zoning district. In considering the proposal at the Jan. 11, 2022 meeting, Commissioner Madgic made an amendment to limit the maximum height at 50 ft throughout the entire project. Initially she stated 50 ft or 4 stories (2h10min) but this is later clarified by both her and Mayor Andrus to be a limited height of 50 ft throughout the entire project (see 2h10min-2h13min). This was clarified yet again by Mayor Andrus at 2h17min where she again states the entire project to be limited to 50 ft. The amendment then passed at 2h18min. There is no question that 50 feet is the maximum height intended by this amendment, and that it is to limit the height within the R5, B2M, REMU and R3 districts on the parcel. I have included the link to the Jan.11,2022 meeting here for your review: https://bozeman.granicus.com/player/clip/221?meta_id=25382 -- Diane Sheehan Egnatz 339-206-4459