The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEmailCorrespondance5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…1/10 Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments 22 messages Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:45 AM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>, "jim@jrothgeb.com" <jim@jrothgeb.com> Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> April 19th, 2021 Aspekt Architecture ATTN: Scott Freimuth 1103 N. Pinecrest Dr. Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR Dear Scott, The Development Review Committee has completed review on your Concept Review application for Glen Lake Subdivision CONR (#21104). Please find attached the DRC review memo which lists required code corrections and advisory comments. Engineering is still finalizing their comments and will be sent in a subsequent email. We hope that these comments and suggestions assist you with this potential future project. Please note that comments are preliminary and based on information provided in your application. A concept plan submittal does not include all required information for formal review and comments are therefore generalized. I am here to support you throughout the development review process. If at any time you have questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me. Diane Tolhurst | Development Review Coordinator, Community Development City of Bozeman | 20 East Olive St. | P.O. Box 1230 | Bozeman, MT 59771 P: 406.582.2938 | C: 406.451.6248 | E: dtolhurst@bozeman.net | W: www.bozeman.net 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…2/10 City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constuon (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retenon policies. Emails that contain confidenal informaon such as informaon related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR Letter.pdf 549K Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:54 AM To: Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net> Cc: "jim@jrothgeb.com" <jim@jrothgeb.com>, Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thank you Diane, When can we expect engineering comments back? Nakeisha, regarding your comment # 4 - zero lot line condition: I thought any mixed- use building was classified ad a commercial building? Can you please provide a code reference for the definition of a commercial building for clarification? Happy to discuss over the phone if it's easier. Scott [Quoted text hidden] Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net>Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:26 AM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>, Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net> Cc: "jim@jrothgeb.com" <jim@jrothgeb.com> Hey Sco, I’ve revised comment #4 accordingly. I just reviewed this was staff and my applicaon of this code secon was incorrect. The zero lot line condion can be used for non-residenal. My apologies! Let me know if you have any other quesons, Nakeisha Lyon | Associate Planner | Community Development City of Bozeman | 20 East Olive St. | P.O. Box 1230 | Bozeman, MT 59771 P: 406.582.2963 | E: nlyon@bozeman.net | W: www.bozeman.net/planning The Department of Community Development is revising its operaons unl further noce to address COVID-19. We appreciate your paence and are working hard to keep as much stability of operaons as possible. There may be delays in responding to 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…3/10 inquiries. We connue to receive and review development applicaons digitally (See COVID-19 Development Review Procedures.) Some applicaon types may see delays in review due to suspension of public meengs. From: Sco Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 10:54 AM To: Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc: jim@jrothgeb.com; Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: Re: 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaon. Do not click links or open aachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR Letter.pdf 911K Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:58 AM To: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thank you Nakeisha, With this in mind, is it fair to say that the parking is allowed (your comment 13.a) along the lot 3 and 4 boundary given that we can claim the same 0' setback? [Quoted text hidden] Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net>Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:05 PM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Yes! Just disregard that as well J [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:20 PM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Cc: "jim@jrothgeb.com" <jim@jrothgeb.com>, Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Sco, I am ancipang Engineering comments to be ready by Wednesday. Again, my apologies for the tardiness of these comments. I will send them to you as soon as they are available. Thank you! Diane Tolhurst | Development Review Coordinator, Community Development 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…4/10 City of Bozeman | 20 East Olive St. | P.O. Box 1230 | Bozeman, MT 59771 P: 406.582.2938 | C: 406.451.6248 | E: dtolhurst@bozeman.net | W: www.bozeman.net From: Sco Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 10:54 AM To: Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc: jim@jrothgeb.com; Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: Re: 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaon. Do not click links or open aachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you Diane, [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:35 PM To: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thanks Nakeisha, One more question: regarding your comment number 2 - residential vs non-residential area. Should this calculation be per building or aggregate per the development? Thanks, Scott [Quoted text hidden] Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net>Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 9:55 AM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Hi Sco, I would say per building based on the definion for accessory. Thank you, [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…5/10 Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:46 AM To: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thanks Nakeisha, I was actually thinking it would be the opposite, as the definition specifically states the accessory use can be a subordinate building? Accessory building or use. A subordinate building, or portion of the principal building, located on the same lot as the principal building, or a subordinate use of land, either of which is customarily incidental to the principal building or to the principal use of land. Individual public utility installations above ground are considered accessory buildings. Is the fact that the lots are not aggregated a factor here? Ideally we would like to add as much residential square footage as possible across the development to account for the surplus non-residential footage. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Scott [Quoted text hidden] Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net>Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:54 AM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> I was referring to the footnote in the permitted uses table regarding the accessory residential which states “for the purpose of this section, accessory means less than 50 percent of the gross floor area of the building, and not located on the ground floor.” [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:05 AM To: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Oh I see, so this supersedes the definition of accessory use in article 7? Is there any way to get relief from this? Thanks, Scott [Quoted text hidden] Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net>Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Yes. Let me ask the big bosses and get back to you. [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:22 AM To: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thank you [Quoted text hidden] 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…6/10 Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net>Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:35 PM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> The great planning powers have denoted that there is no departure of this standard and the calculaons must be per building based on the footnote. [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:03 PM To: Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>, "freimuth.scott" <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Hi Diane, Thanks for the update on Monday and your team working so responsively with Sco. Any updates from our friends at Engineering? We’re raring to go on the site plan but need the green light. Thanks, Jim (cell: 818.636.4823) [Quoted text hidden] Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:15 PM To: Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>, "freimuth.scott" <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Jim, I have been promised by Engineering that these will be available tomorrow. I will be following up with Lance tomorrow and will get back with you. Again, my sincerest apologies for the delay. [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:13 PM To: Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>, "freimuth.scott" <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thanks much. Sco will be pacing outside of “Labor and Delivery” for the good news. Jim [Quoted text hidden] Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:48 AM 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…7/10 To: Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>, "freimuth.scott" <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> April 23rd, 2021 Aspekt Architecture ATTN: Sco Freimuth 1103 N. Pinecrest Dr. Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR Dear Sco, Engineering has finalized their review for Glen Lake Subdivision CONR (#21104). Please see the memo aached in this email for required code correcons and advisory comments. Thank you again for your paence, please let us know if you need anything else. [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] April 19th, 2021 Aspekt Architecture ATTN: Scott Freimuth 1103 N. Pinecrest Dr. Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR Dear Scott, 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…8/10 The Development Review Committee has completed review on your Concept Review application for Glen Lake Subdivision CONR (#21104). Please find attached the DRC review memo which lists required code corrections and advisory comments. Engineering is still finalizing their comments and will be sent in a subsequent email. We hope that these comments and suggestions assist you with this potential future project. Please note that comments are preliminary and based on information provided in your application. A concept plan submittal does not include all required information for formal review and comments are therefore generalized. I am here to support you throughout the development review process. If at any time you have questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me. Diane Tolhurst | Development Review Coordinator, Community Development City of Bozeman | 20 East Olive St. | P.O. Box 1230 | Bozeman, MT 59771 P: 406.582.2938 | C: 406.451.6248 | E: dtolhurst@bozeman.net | W: www.bozeman.net City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constuon (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retenon policies. Emails that contain confidenal informaon such as informaon related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constuon (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retenon policies. Emails that contain confidenal informaon such as informaon related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constuon (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retenon policies. Emails that contain confidenal informaon such as informaon related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. [Quoted text hidden] 21104 Glen Lake Eng Comments CONR 4-23-2021 Final.pdf 192K Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:26 PM To: Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net> Cc: Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>, Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thanks Diane, Because engineering did not comment on parking along the street (per the answer to applicant question #1 in the planning comments), is it safe to assume that parking is allowed? Also, is it possible to get these comments (planning and engineering) in word doc form for ease of responding in our site plan application? Thanks, 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A1697484312…9/10 Scott [Quoted text hidden] Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 2:33 PM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>, Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Sco, Engineering is going to discuss your queson about parking in their standing Engineering meeng on Tuesday aernoon. It’s a policy level decision and there is concern about allowing dedicated parking spots on a collector street (Manly). I will get back in touch with you aer they have that discussion. I have aached the Word documents from both reviews (Planning and Engineering). Let us know if there is anything else. Thank you! [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] 2 attachments 21104 Glen Lake Eng Comments CONR 4-23-2021 Final.docx 81K 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR Letter DRAFT.docx 266K Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net>Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:25 PM To: Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>, Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Sco, I was able to get an answer to your queson below: Yes, on street parking is allowed on both the local and collector secons in this area. However, the parking calculaons are applicable only to the residenal units. Parking is only allowed in the designated spaces adjacent to the subject property – meaning as long as there are no street signs up saying no parking or fire hydrants restricng the parking spots you should be able to use it as parking. Nakeisha can help verify parking spots/calculaons if needed or if you have addional parking related quesons. Let us know if you had addional quesons or if anything was le unanswered. Thank you! [Quoted text hidden] 5/27/2021 Gmail - 21104 Glen Lake Subdivision CONR - Staff Comments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=6b9101fe34&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697484312783655215&simpl=msg-f%3A169748431…10/10 [Quoted text hidden] Scott Freimuth <freimuth.scott@gmail.com>Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 4:35 PM To: Diane Tolhurst <dtolhurst@bozeman.net> Cc: Jim <Jim@jrothgeb.com>, Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@bozeman.net> Thanks Diane, I think this clears it up but I will let you or Nakeisha know if we have any further questions. Scott [Quoted text hidden]