HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix F Water & Mechanical Details 02-22-20211
Ryan Krueger
From:Tim Staub <tstaub@chengineers.com>
Sent:Monday, February 22, 2021 3:46 PM
To:Ryan Krueger
Subject:FW: water - mechanical
From: Chris Doyle <cdoyle@cdsiengineering.com>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 3:44 PM
To: Tim Staub <tstaub@chengineers.com>; Ben Kennedy <BenK@architects-sma.com>
Cc: Charley Franklin <CharleyF@architects-sma.com>; Curt Smit <csmit@cdsiengineering.com>
Subject: RE: water - mechanical
Tim,
Our estimation of the max water flow usage of this building will be approximately 260gpm which will be used to size a
4 Inch Water meter to the building.
The 2 existing 6” sewer services will work for the building if they are at a ¼” per foot(2%) slope.
IF the 2 existing 6 “ sewer services are at 1/8” per foot slope (1%) then an additional 4” service will be required for the
building.
Thanks,
Christopher Doyle
Cell# (406) 270-9986
From: Tim Staub [mailto:tstaub@chengineers.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 1:49 PM
To: Chris Doyle <cdoyle@cdsiengineering.com>; Ben Kennedy <BenK@architects-sma.com>
Cc: Charley Franklin <CharleyF@architects-sma.com>; Curt Smit <csmit@cdsiengineering.com>
Subject: RE: water - mechanical
Hi Chris,
Thanks so much for this. Please see attached sheet C3.0. It was my understanding that we were planning to use both of
the existing 6” diameter sewer services off of Village Crossing Way for the residential portion of the building. Then, cut
a new 4” service in off of Village Downtown blvd. for the garage level items like the dog wash and janitors closet.
Would it be possible for you to provide an official water usage calc to satisfy the city’s comment below?
The applicant must provide water usage and confirm proposed water usage is within allowed capacity
designated to the parcel upon further development.
2
As far as the part about “confirm proposed water usage is within allowed capacity designated to the parcel” don’t
worry about that.
Thanks,
Tim
From: Chris Doyle <cdoyle@cdsiengineering.com>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 1:22 PM
To: Tim Staub <tstaub@chengineers.com>; Ben Kennedy <BenK@architects-sma.com>
Cc: Charley Franklin <CharleyF@architects-sma.com>; Curt Smit <csmit@cdsiengineering.com>
Subject: RE: water - mechanical
Hello Tim,
The Building water service and meter will need to be a 4”.
The sewer size leaving the building has been calculated out to be an 8”.
The Fire sprinkler service will likely be a 6” service.
Let me know if you need any other information.
From: Tim Staub [mailto:tstaub@chengineers.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 8:09 AM
To: Ben Kennedy <BenK@architects-sma.com>; Chris Doyle <cdoyle@cdsiengineering.com>
Cc: Charley Franklin <CharleyF@architects-sma.com>
Subject: RE: water - mechanical
Hi Chris,
Just a slight correction. I do not need a sewer calc. That is done.
Thanks,
Tim
From: Ben Kennedy <BenK@architects-sma.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2021 6:41 PM
To: Chris Doyle <cdoyle@cdsiengineering.com>
Cc: Charley Franklin <CharleyF@architects-sma.com>; Tim Staub <tstaub@chengineers.com>
Subject: FW: water - mechanical
Chris,
I know you’re not super familiar with the Lot 5 project. Tanner has done some photometric plans and elevations for
it. We’re submitting a final Site Plan modification for the project on Monday (the 22nd). Unfortunately the team
missed one of the City of Bozeman comments and it was just brought to our attention on Friday. It’s in regards to the
size of the fire service and domestic water service lines. In addition our civil engineer – Tim Staub at C&H, also copied
on this email – is looking for a sewer calculation as well. I’m not sure if either of these items are long tedious tasks or
something that can be done in 30 minutes? Either way, we’re looking for your insight if you have time. If you don’t
have time on Monday, hopefully it’s something you could make time for in the coming weeks with the intent that when
we get the comment back from the city again we could provide them with a answer quickly.
Attached are the CAD plans of the building. Tanner has a revit model as well.
-92 apartment units (mix of 1 bd, 2bd, and 3 bd)
3
-two bathrooms at the lobby
-janitor room in the garage
-dog wash in the garage
Happy to catch up on Monday if you have time.
Thanks,
BK
Benjamin Kennedy NCARB
ARCHITECT
SMA ARCHITECTS
Helena | Bozeman
P 406-442-4933 Ext. 321
architects-sma.com
COVID-19 UPDATE: SMA staff are working in office or remotely at personal discretion and according to the Governor’s
current directives. All visitors are required to make an appointment before coming into the office.
Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | YouTube
From: Tim Staub <tstaub@chengineers.com>
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 4:39 PM
To: Ben Kennedy <BenK@architects-sma.com>
Subject: water - mechanical
A couple things
1) We need the mechanical to determine the size of the fire service and domestic water service.
2) Also would be nice if they could dial in a calc to help with this last minute comment below. For now I can just
add 5% to my sewer calc, but in the coming weeks it would be good if the mechanical could provide some flow
numbers to help us satisfy this comment.
The applicant must provide water usage and confirm proposed water usage is within allowed capacity
designated to the parcel upon further development.
The existing design report that the city has on file for this subdivision does not seem to match the subdivision as it
exists. I think there were changes after the fact so verifying the allowed capacity is going to be a little difficult.
Tim Staub, P.E.
Project Engineer
www.chengineers.com
4
"This message and/or attachment contains confidential information. Distribution of this
information must be only to those of C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc employees or
individuals contractually approved to receive this information. If you are not the
addressee and/or are not authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use,
copy, disclose,forward, print or take any action based on this message or any information
herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately
by reply e-mail and delete this message."