Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20_GeotechnicalReportForReference_04132021MONTANA | WASHINGTON | IDAHO | NORTH DAKOTA | PENNSYLVANIA JOB NO. B20-068-002 October 2020 REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT CLIENT ENGINEER HomeBase Partners 20 North Tracy Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Craig Nadeau, PE Craig.nadeau@tdhengineering.com REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROJECT NAME PROJECT LOCATION 406.586.0277 tdhengineering.com 234 E. Babcock, Suite 3 Bozeman, MT 59715 NORTH CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT BOZEMAN, MONTANA North Central Development Table of Contents Bozeman, Montana i Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 3 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Geology and Physiography .............................................................................................. 5 3.2 Surface Conditions ........................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Preliminary Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 6 3.3.1 Soils ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.3.2 Ground Water ........................................................................................................... 8 4.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 13 4.1 Site Grading and Excavations........................................................................................ 13 4.2 Foundation Systems ...................................................................................................... 13 4.2.1 Block 4 .................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.2 Block 3 .................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.3 Mountain View ........................................................................................................ 15 4.2.4 Summary ................................................................................................................. 16 4.3 Slab-on-Grade Construction .......................................................................................... 16 4.4 Pavement Systems ........................................................................................................ 17 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 19 5.1 Site Grading and Excavations........................................................................................ 19 5.2 Conventional Shallow Foundations on Structural Fill .................................................... 20 5.3 Conventional Shallow Foundations Over EAP Improved Soils ..................................... 21 5.4 Foundation Walls............................................................................................................ 22 5.5 Exterior Concrete Flatwork ............................................................................................ 23 5.6 Interior Concrete Floor Slabs ......................................................................................... 23 5.7 Pavements ..................................................................................................................... 24 5.8 Continuing Services ....................................................................................................... 26 6.0 SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDIES ............................. 28 6.1 Field Explorations ........................................................................................................... 28 6.2 Laboratory Testing ......................................................................................................... 28 7.0 LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 30 North Central Development Executive Summary Bozeman, Montana Page ii APPENDIX  Boring Location Map (Figure 1)  Logs of Exploratory Borings (Figures 2 through 15)  Laboratory Test Data (Figures 16 through 54)  LTTPBind Online PG Asphalt Binder Analysis Summary  Construction Standard 02801-06C  Soil Classification and Sampling Terminology for Engineering Purposes  Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes North Central Development Executive Summary Bozeman, Montana Page 1 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT BOZEMAN, MONTANA 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The geotechnical investigation for the proposed North Central development encountered primarily fine-grained sandy lean clay overlying dense native clayey gravel with sand. A single boring encountered surficial fill material, presumably associated with the original site grading and construction of the existing Medical Arts facility. The overall North Central development is divided into three separate areas, each proposed to encompass all or part of a city block. The first section, referred to as “Block 4”, is located on the west side of North Willson Avenue between Beall and Villard Streets and currently consists of asphalt paved parking lot utilized by the Medical Arts building. The second section, referred to as “Block 3”, is located between North Willson and North Tracy Avenues and between Beall and Villard Streets. Block 3 is currently the site of the existing Medical Arts building which is planned to be demolished in the future and prior to construction of this project. The final portion of the project referred to as “Mountain View,” is located to the south of Block 3 between Beall and Lamme Streets and between North Willson and North Tracy Avenues. This area currently contains the old Mountain View Care Center facility, which is no longer in operation. The existing buildings in this section will be demolished except for the westernmost structure. The seismic site class for the area is D, and the risk of seismically-induced liquefaction or soil settlement is considered low and does not warrant additional evaluation. The primary geotechnical concerns regarding this project are the presence of soft compressible surficial fine-grained soils, existing basements which will be demolished and backfilled, the potential for unknown fill material, and potentially shallow ground water conditions. In general, the soft, fine-grained soils are not suitable to support loads typical of multi-story construction without experiencing excessive settlement and adverse foundation performance. Differential settlements would be exacerbated by the need to demolish and backfill existing basements beneath portions of the existing construction with readily available structural gravel. These materials can act very differently than native soils when loaded, which leads to differential settlement. Furthermore, the project area is highly developed, which increases the potential for encountering fill materials, which often contain construction debris and may not be suitable for use beneath the new construction. Fill was encountered in one boring performed during our investigation and is anticipated to be present at other locations, which could not be investigated due to access restrictions. Based on our understanding of the project and the concerns discussed above, it is our opinion that all new building foundations and slab systems will require subsurface improvements comprised of either: • The complete removal of the fine-grained surficial soils down to native gravels and replacement with properly compacted structural fill. North Central Development Executive Summary Bozeman, Montana Page 2 • The use of a specialized subsurface improvement system using Engineered Aggregate Piers (EAP) to improve to soft clay soils in place and facilitate standard foundation construction over these materials. • Other deep foundation methods used to bridge structural loads to competent bearing material. All of these methods are suitable to achieve design bearing pressures of at least 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf) and should limit potential foundation and slab settlements to less than ¾- inch; however, other deep foundation methods are not commonly utilized in the Bozeman area and typically are not cost-effective thus we have not considered them as part of this report. We have also included recommendations for exterior concrete flatwork and asphalt pavement system for your consideration, which consider the presence of the soft, fine-grained soils. In most cases, it is not practical or cost-effective to completely remove or improve these soft soils beneath exterior site development features. Also, these features are generally able to tolerate a higher level of potential movement without experiencing detrimental impact to their function on the site. However, if the project is unable or unwilling to accept any risk of potential vertical movements or distress to such exterior features, the use of similar improvement methods, as discussed above, should be incorporated throughout the project site. North Central Development Introduction Bozeman, Montana Page 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose and Scope This report presents our assessment of the proposed North Central Development planned for downtown Bozeman, Montana. This assessment has been prepared based on geotechnical investigations conducted in May 2019 and September 2020 across the limits of the planned development. The purpose of this assessment is to provide geotechnical recommendations for the support of the proposed structures and design of the overall project. A preliminary geotechnical investigation comprised of four borings with completed ground water monitoring wells was performed in May 2019 within the limits of this development. Samples were obtained from these borings and tested in our Great Falls laboratory to verify field classifications. Results of our preliminary investigation were considered and used in this analysis and report. 2.2 Project Description The overall North Central Development is divided into three separate areas and each is proposed to encompass all or part of a city block. The first section, referred to as “Block 4”, is located on the west side of North Willson Avenue between Beall and Villard Streets. The area currently consists of an asphalt paved parking lot utilized by visitors to the adjacent Medical Arts building. We understand that this site is anticipated for a future structure being approximately 30,000 square feet is plan. This structure is anticipated to be six-stories above grade with the northern three quarters incorporating a below-grade basement extending approximately 10 feet below finished exterior grade. The lower 2.5 stories will be concrete parking structure with four stories of wood framing above. The second section of the project is referred to as “Block 3” and is located between North Willson and North Tracy Avenues and also between Beall and Villard Streets. This area is the current location of the Medical Arts facility and associated asphalt parking lots. The future development will include the demolition and removal of the existing infrastructure. It will be replaced with five separate structures ranging in size from approximately 6,000 to 15,000 square feet in plan and as summarized below. • Building 3-5 and 3-4 are both to be six-stories above grade with a basement for parking. They will utilize two post-tensioned decks at the lower levels with five floors of wood-framing above. • Building 3-3 is also to be a six-story structure but will not include any below-grade space. It will utilize a single post-tensioned deck at the lower level with five floors of wood-framing above. North Central Development Introduction Bozeman, Montana Page 4 • Buildings 3-2 and 3-1 are both to be five-stories above grade with no below-grade space. They will utilize a single post-tensioned deck at the lower level with four floors of wood-framing above. The final section of the project referred to as “Mountain View”, is located to the south of Block 3. It comprises the eastern three-quarters of the block between Beall and Lamme Streets and North Willson and Tracy Avenues. This is the current location of the now-closed Mountain View Care Center facility. Like the Medical Arts building, the existing Rocky Mountain Care Center is to be demolished. Two new structures are planned to be built on this portion of the project and will range in size from approximately 10,000 and 20,000 square feet in plan, respectively. Both are to include five-stories above grade with no below-grade basement planned. They will be completely constructed of post-tensioned concrete or steel. The overall development area is also anticipated to consist of portions of asphalt pavement, primarily for access roads between structures in Block 3. Typical landscaping and exterior concrete flatwork are also expected. Below grade storm water retention and infiltration are also common on these projects and are anticipated. North Central Development Site Conditions Bozeman, Montana Page 5 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Geology and Physiography The downtown Bozeman area is geologically characterized as gravel (Qgr, QTgr) and upper Tertiary sediment or sedimentary rock (Tsu). The gravel formations are comprised of variable deposits that range from pebble to boulder size and include sand, silt, and clay. The deposits are dominantly alluvial terrace, abandoned channel and flood plain, remnant alluvial fan, and local glacial outwash. Upper Tertiary sediments also frequent the area but are generally less common. These sediments and sedimentary rock formations consist of conglomerate, tuffaceous sandstone and siltstone, marlstone, and sediment or ash beds. Figure 1 Geologic Map of Montana, Edition 1.0 (2007) Montana Bureau of Mines & Geology Based on the subsurface conditions encountered, the site falls under seismic Site Class D. The structural engineer should utilize the site classification above to determine the appropriate seismic design data for use on this project in accordance with current applicable building codes. The likelihood of seismically-induced soil liquefaction or settlement for this project is low and does not warrant additional evaluation. 3.2 Surface Conditions The existing area for this development is heavily developed, with existing parking lots and structures covering the planned development areas. Block 4, located west of North Willson Avenue between Beall and Villard Streets, is currently utilized as an asphalt parking lot for the adjacent Medical Arts complex located in Block 3. The parking lot is slightly elevated above the North Central Development Site Conditions Bozeman, Montana Page 6 elevation of North Willson Avenue, and the east side is supported by a small (approximately two-foot-high) retaining wall with irrigated sod and concrete sidewalks in the boulevards. Block 3 currently consists of an approximately 50,000-square-foot building housing the Bozeman Medical Arts Center. The structure is mainly single-story with a three-story section on the north end. All or part of this structure is known to include a full-depth basement. Existing asphalt parking lots are located on the northwest and northeast sides of the existing building, with the southwest, south, and southeast sides comprised of irrigated sod and landscaping. Several concrete sidewalks and similar features surround the existing facility. The Mountain View block is heavily developed like Block 3 and currently consists of an approximate 23,000-square-foot structure previously housing the Mountain View Care Center. The structure is predominantly two to three stories and constructed of brick and concrete. Based on exterior observations, the structure may include some below-grade space (partial height basement). The structure is predominantly surrounded by irrigated sod, landscaping, exterior concrete flatwork, and limited asphalt paving on the north side. 3.3 Preliminary Subsurface Conditions 3.3.1 Soils Based on the drilling performed, the subsurface soil conditions consist of fine-grained surficial soils comprised of primarily sandy lean clay soils with occasional sandy silt and clayey sand containing very high fines. These fine-grained soils overlie native clayey gravel or clayey sand. Fill material generally consistent with the native soils and containing construction debris were observed in a single boring (B-10). The borings indicate the surficial clay and fill (when present) extend to depths of approximately 4 to 12 feet below existing site grades. The underlying gravel and sand extend to depths of at least 31.8 feet, and all borings were terminated in this material. Given the amount of existing infrastructure and development within the proposed project limits, we do anticipate additional areas of fill not identified by these investigations to be encountered at various locations. While fill was only encountered in a single boring during our investigations, it is typical of most site development projects and should be anticipated. The fill material observed appears to be comprised of reworked native soils containing construction debris and may be suitable for reuse during construction; however, depending on the type and amount of construction debris or the presence of other deleterious materials (organics, contamination, etc.), the materials may not be suitable for reuse and would warrant removal from the site. Due to our inability to investigate close to existing structures, the fill may not be identifiable until the start of construction and should be evaluated at that time to determine if the material warrants removal or is suitable for reuse on the project. North Central Development Site Conditions Bozeman, Montana Page 7 The following is a summary of the subsurface conditions based on the subsurface investigations and laboratory testing performed in May 2019 and September 2020. Conditions across the site may vary from those shown on the attached borings logs and within the discussion below. FILL MATERIAL Soil fill material was encountered in a single boring (B-10) located on the south end of the parking lot in the northeast corner of Block 3. This boring was located at the high side of the parking lot near the existing structure. The asphalt section is underlain by fill materials visually classified as lean clay with sand and clayey sand with gravel extending to a depth of approximately 6.6 feet below grade. This fill zone is highly heterogeneous and contained visible construction debris, including brick, concrete, and wood fragments in the auger spoils. The existing asphalt surfacing and underlying base course gravels are also considered fill material as they are not native to the site and were imported; however, they are of higher quality and better controlled than most fill. Pavement sections were present at 6 of the 14 borings performed for this project. The asphalt ranged in thickness from 2.5 to 6.0 inches of pavement. The underlying base course gravel extended to depths varying from 0.8 to 3.0 feet below existing site grade at pavement borings. SURFICIAL FINE-GRAINED SOILS The fine-grained surficial soils consist primarily of sandy lean clay; however, transitional zones of clayey sand were encountered in three of the borings (B-9, B-12, and B-14) and sandy silt was encountered in one boring (B-11). The fine-grained soils are generally soft to firm as indicated by penetration resistance values, which ranged from 2 to 20 blows per foot (bpf) but averaged only 6 bpf. Based on five consolidation tests and two unconfined compression tests performed on samples of these materials, they are considered slightly to highly compressible and relatively weak. The results of these tests are summarized below: Table 1 – Summary of Unconfined & Consolidation Testing Boring No. Sample Depth (ft) Unconfined Compressive Strength (psf) Undrained Shear Strength (psf) Sample Compression Under 4,000 psf loading B-5 5.0 – 7.0 2,773 1,386 0.8% B-7 5.0 – 6.0 ----- ----- 2.4% B-9 5.0 – 6.0 1,865 933 3.5% B-12 5.0 – 7.0 ----- ----- 3.4% B-14 5.0 – 7.0 ----- ----- 1.8% North Central Development Site Conditions Bozeman, Montana Page 8 Nine samples of these materials were tested and contained between 0 and 25 percent gravel, between 13 and 51 percent sand, and between 42 and 81 percent fines (clay and silt). Ten additional samples exhibited liquid limits ranging from 32 to 49 percent and plasticity indices ranging from 12 to 19 percent. The natural moisture contents varied from 7 to 31 percent and averaged 21 percent. A composite sample of the material was tested in our laboratory to evaluate its compactive properties in accordance with ASTM D698 and its strength when utilized as a pavement subgrade using a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test in accordance with ASTM D1883. The results of these tests are shown below. Table 2 – Summary of Proctor and CBR Testing Maximum Density (pcf) Optimum Moisture Content (%) California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 115.6 12.8 3.7% @ 90% Compaction NATIVE SAND AND GRAVEL The surficial clays are were underlain in all 14 borings by native gravel with sand or clayey sand with gravel. The native gravels are medium dense to very dense as indicated by penetration resistance values, which ranged from 14 to greater than 100 bpf and averaged 65 bpf. Eleven samples of this material were tested and contained between 21 and 57 percent gravel, between 29 and 62 percent sand, and between 13 and 28 percent fines (clay and silt). These gradations are not anticipated to be completely representative of the actual in situ soil properties due to the inherent difficulties with sampling these soils using drilling methods, which limit the size of rocks collected and cause mechanical breaking of the rocks into smaller sizes. In situ materials are likely to be significantly gravellier than is represented by these tests. The natural moisture contents varied from 3 to 28 percent and averaged 13 percent based on the sample depth, clay content, and proximity to the ground water table. 3.3.2 Ground Water Ground water was encountered within all fourteen borings performed for this project. The water depth and date of measurement for each boring are summarized in Table 3 on the next page. North Central Development Site Conditions Bozeman, Montana Page 9 Table 3 – Summary of Initial Ground Water Depths Boring No. Surface Elevation (ft)* Ground Water Depth (ft) Date of Measurement Ground Water Elevation (ft)* B-1 4798.0 11.8 5-22-2019 4786.2 B-2 4796.5 11.1 5-22-2019 4785.4 B-3 4799.9 12.5 5-21-2019 4787.4 B-4 4802.1 13.0 5-21-2019 4789.1 B-5 4799.9 14.1 9-15-2020 4785.8 B-6 4798.4 13.1 9-15-2020 4785.3 B-7 4801.2 14.2 9-15-2020 4787.0 B-8 4802.0 14.5 9-15-2020 4787.5 B-9 4797.5 13.3 9-16-2020 4784.2 B-10 4801.5 22.5 9-16-2020 4779.0 B-11 4805.9 14.0 9-16-2020 4791.9 B-12 4801.4 13.5 9-16-2020 4787.9 B-13 4801.5 13.3 9-17-2020 4788.2 B-14 4803.4 13.8 9-17-2020 4789.6 * The elevations reported above were collected using a handheld GPS unit. The accuracy of such units are generally ± 3 feet vertically. The elevations reported are based on the Geoid12A (Conus) datum. It is the responsibility of others to verify these elevations and make any necessary conversion to the project datum prior to use in any design or construction applications. Four monitoring wells were installed in May 2019 (Borings B-1 through B-4) and since their initial installation, 28 additional ground water measurements have been performed and are summarized in Table 4 below. Ground water readings in late 2019 are somewhat erratic, with significant changes from week to week. The readings collected to date in 2020 appear more consistent and are likely more representative of the actual ground water behavior. All four wells are exhibiting a seasonal rise in the ground water table of approximately one foot. Overall global ground water depths can change between seasons and from year to year. The actual seasonal variations can change from year to year as well and may exceed fluctuations observed in the wells since their installation. North Central Development Site Conditions Bozeman, Montana Page 10 Table 4 – Ground Water Monitoring Data Date Depth of Water Measured (Feet) B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 6-3-2019 10.3 7.6 11.5 13.2 6-10-2019 11.0 11.0 11.6 13.3 6-17-2019 11.5 11.3 12.2 13.4 6-24-2019 12.1 11.7 12.3 11.7 7-1-2019 11.1 9.8 9.8 11.1 7-9-2019 11.8 11.9 13.0 11.5 7-15-2019 11.3 11.4 12.1 10.8 7-29-2019 12.2 12.4 12.8 10.0 8-6-2019 11.3 12.0 13.5 13.8 8-12-2019 12.0 11.7 13.1 13.8 8-19-2019 11.9 11.8 12.3 13.6 8-26-2019 12.1 11.8 12.8 14.0 4-7-2020 11.8 11.7 13.0 13.4 4-14-2020 11.8 11.6 13.1 13.5 4-22-2020 11.5 11.4 13.0 13.4 4-28-2020 11.6 11.6 13.0 13.5 5-5-2020 11.5 11.2 12.9 13.6 5-14-2020 11.5 11.3 12.6 13.4 5-19-2020 11.4 11.2 12.6 13.3 5-26-2020 11.4 11.1 12.3 13.3 6-3-2020 11.5 11.2 12.4 13.5 6-9-2020 11.3 11.0 12.2 13.0 6-16-2020 11.3 11.0 12.2 13.1 6-23-2020 11.2 10.8 12.0 13.0 7-7-2020 11.2 10.9 12.0 13.0 7-14-2020 11.4 11.0 12.2 13.2 7-22-2020 11.6 11.3 12.4 13.4 7-28-2020 11.7 11.4 12.6 13.5 7. 0 8. 0 9. 0 10 . 0 11 . 0 12 . 0 13 . 0 14 . 0 15 . 0 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 9 6 / 4 / 2 0 1 9 6 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 9 7 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 9 8 / 3 / 2 0 1 9 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 9 9/12/2019 D e p t h ( F t ) Da t e ( M o n t h , D a y , Y e a r ) FI G U R E 2 - 2 0 1 9 G r o u n d W a t e r M o n i t o r i n g D a t a B1 B2 B3 B4 7. 0 8. 0 9. 0 10 . 0 11 . 0 12 . 0 13 . 0 14 . 0 3/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 0 4 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 0 5 / 9 / 2 0 2 0 5 / 2 9 / 2 0 2 0 6 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 0 7 / 8 / 2 0 2 0 7/28/2020 8/17/2020 D e p t h ( F t ) Da t e ( M o n t h , D a y , Y e a r ) FI G U R E 3 - 2 0 2 0 G r o u n d W a t e r M o n i t o r i n g D a t a B1 B2 B3 B4 North Central Development Engineering Analysis Bozeman, Montana Page 13 4.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS 4.1 Site Grading and Excavations Based on our field work and experience in downtown Bozeman, fine-grained surficial soils containing varying concentrations of sand are anticipated in the upper 4 to 12 feet of the site. The surficial clay will be underlain by native clayey gravels with sand or clayey sand with gravel extending to depths of greater than 30 feet. Due to the highly developed condition of the area currently, we also anticipate surficial fill materials associated with pavement systems, general site grading, and foundation backfill to be encountered. Such fill was encountered in several borings and ranged in thickness from 0.5 to 6.6 feet. Most of these borings were limited to the surficial pavement section and did not extend below 2.5 feet; however, one boring (B-10) encountered site grading fill containing brick, concrete, wood, and other construction debris below the pavement section and extending to a depth of 6.6 feet. Boring B-10 was located near an existing building and likely in the building foundation backfill, indicating similar quality backfill could be encountered throughout the site. The suitability of any fill materials to be reused will need to be further evaluated during construction based on the type and amount of debris it contains as well as potential for contamination and other factors. Based on the ground water data collected, ground water should be below the depth of most foundation and utility excavations for this project; however, ground water levels have historically been located about 10 to 13 feet below existing site grades and may be encountered in deep excavations associated with the demolition of existing basement, installation of new basements, or deep utilities beneath basement systems. Seasonal fluctuation in the ground water should also be expected. Due to the relatively high ground water elevations, the use of storm water infiltration below basement elevations will be problematic. This should be considered when preparing the storm water and foundation designs for this project. 4.2 Foundation Systems Based on the subsurface conditions observed during the site investigations performed for this area, the use of conventional shallow foundations is considered suitable for the proposed development areas, but varying types and degrees of subsurface improvement will be needed to ensure the long-term performance of the structures. The surficial clay soils are considered soft and highly compressible, making them unsuitable for the support of the anticipated multi- story construction. Potential impacts of the clay soil can be mitigated using one of two methods. • Complete removal of the clay zone down to the native gravels and replacement with properly compacted structural fill. • Installation of Engineered Aggregate Piers (EAPs) to improve subgrade conditions and mitigate settlement of the clay zone. North Central Development Engineering Analysis Bozeman, Montana Page 14 • Other deep foundation methods used to bridge structural loads to competent bearing material. The best-suited approach will vary from structure to structure within the development and will be controlled by the depth of the fine-grained soils, the design footing elevation (or depth), the depth of existing foundations being removed (where applicable), and other factors. In our experience, the use of complete removal and replacement methods are best suited to structures where the overall clay thickness remaining beneath the foundations are less than three feet or those where a significant portion of the new building footprint will already be removed and backfilled as part of the existing structure demolition. In these cases, the cost of excavation and imported structural fill is generally feasible for the project. Where clay thicknesses exceed three feet beneath footings and where significant demolition of existing foundation is not necessary, the use of EAP improvements may be a more economical alternative. EAP systems consist of a series of drilled shafts extending to the native gravels in which densely compacted stone (or structural fill) columns are installed. This process acts to reinforce the clay soils through significant lateral stress increases, which reduce their compressibility and increase their strength, thus allowing for the use of conventional shallow foundation systems. EAP methods are proprietary and will require the involvement of a separate licensed EAP design-build contractor. Below we have looked at each section of the project separately and discussed the suitability of each subgrade improvement method. 4.2.1 Block 4 Four borings were drilled within the limits of the Block 4 portion of the project and include B- 1, B-5, B-7, and B-8. Each of these borings encountered surficial sandy lean clay extending to depths of approximately 6.0 to 8.2 feet. Thus, the northern three-quarters of the structure which is planned to utilize a full-depth basement extending approximately ten feet below grade, are expected to bear upon native gravels and should not warrant any additional subsurface improvements. Footings for the southern portion of this structure are expected to lie approximately two to four feet above the gravel surface. Due to the limited area for this section of the structure, we would recommend using conventional remove and replace methods for this area. It may be possible to reuse portions of the native gravel excavated from the adjacent basement to reduce the volume of imported structural fill required. 4.2.2 Block 3 Six borings were drilled within the limits of the Block 3 portion of the project and include B-2, B-3, B-4, B-6, B-9, and B-10. These borings exhibited greater variability in the depth of the fine-grained surficial soils, and fill was encountered in one boring. For this portion of the North Central Development Engineering Analysis Bozeman, Montana Page 15 project, the depth requiring soil improvement appears to range from 4.0 to 12.0 feet below existing site grades. This portion of the site will also include the demolition and removal of the existing structure, which is known to have a basement beneath at least part or all the existing building’s footprint. At this time, specific locations for existing basements are not known, and these will have a significant impact on the best foundation support system to each of the planned structures. The removal of the existing building is anticipated to impact all the proposed buildings except 3-4, which appears to lie primarily with the existing parking lot. However, any buildings which do not overlie existing basements will likely not be disturbed significantly below the planned footing elevation. Buildings 3-4 and 3-5 are planned to utilize basements which will bear approximately ten feet below existing site grade. Thus, most of these structures will bear within or very near the native gravel surface and would be best suited to the use of simple remove and replace methods. Structural fill thickness ranging from zero to four feet could be required depending on the final grading and finished floor elevation for these structures. Buildings 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3 are all planned to be conventional slab-on-grade structures with no below-grade space and will lie over portions of the existing building foundation, which is to be demolished. Based on our estimates, it appears that at least half of the overall footprint for each of these structures will overlie the existing structure. We are not clear on how much of the existing structure includes a full depth basement; however, assuming the entire structure currently has a basement a significant area of each new structure could require demolition and backfill with structural fill. Given the magnitude of the structural fill anticipated beneath these structures as part of the demolition process, we believe extending the excavations throughout the remainder of the building footprints may be the most economical, pending additional information regarding the location and elevation of existing basements within the existing structure. We are available to assist in determining the most appropriate foundation for each structure. However, the added cost of the excavation imported structural fill, and complexities of excavating to the required depths close to existing roadways need to be considered. These structures would also benefit from the inclusion of full-depth basements as an alternative. 4.2.3 Mountain View Four borings were drilled within the limits of the Mountain View portion of the project and include B-11 through B-14. Each of these borings encountered fine-grained surficial soils extending to depths of approximately 6.5 to 8.1 feet below existing site grades. This portion of the site will also include the demolition and removal of the existing structure, which has a partial basement beneath the east half of the structure. Both planned structures are to utilize slab-on-grade construction with no below-grade spaces. Thus, assuming a finished floor elevation for the structures which are close to that of the existing building and conventional frost depth foundations (four-foot below finished ground surface), structural fill North Central Development Engineering Analysis Bozeman, Montana Page 16 thicknesses of up to four feet could be required using conventional remove and replace methods. The need for over-excavation and backfill anticipated for the demolition of the existing basement is expected to be isolated to the eastern structure within the Mountain View portion of the project only. This is the larger of the planned structures and the existing basement appears to encompass a significant portion of the new building footprint. For this reason, the extension of the over-excavation and replacement beneath the east Mountain View structure is anticipated to be the best option for this building. Demolition of the existing foundation on the west side of this phase is not anticipated to be significantly deeper than the foundation of the planned construction. Thus, given the depth of the native gravel, the use of EAP improvements may be better suited to this particular building. 4.2.4 Summary Overall, given the intended configuration of the planned structures, the need for demolition and filling of existing basement excavations, and the subsurface conditions encountered, we believe that the use of conventional over-excavation to native gravels and replacement with compacted structural fill is best suited for most of the structures on this project. Those structures which are not currently planned to incorporate a basement would generally benefit from its inclusion by significantly reducing or eliminating the need for structural fill within their footprints. Based on our assessment, we believe some limited structures could be more economically constructed use EAP improvements. EAP systems are not warranted beneath any structures planned to utilize a basement. Beneath others, the EAPs would either be utilized solely beneath those portions which do not require removal of the existing foundations or could be utilized beneath the entire building footprint after the existing foundations have been removed and backfilled. The latter option is anticipated to add additional cost to the project; however, the use of a partial EAP system has the potential for greater differential movements resulting from variations in the performance of the various support methods. 4.3 Slab-on-Grade Construction The native fine-grained soils encountered in the borings are generally soft and compressible but not expected to exhibit significant expansive concerns. While slab systems supported over these materials would be susceptible to settlement, none of the slabs for these structures are expected to be heavily loaded. Exterior flatwork associated with site infrastructure are typically relatively inexpensive to repair or replace if excessive movements occur; thus, conventional slab-on-grade construction consisting of a thin cushion course overlying native clay soils is common for these exterior North Central Development Engineering Analysis Bozeman, Montana Page 17 features. However, if critical exterior flatwork is planned for which vertical movements would be detrimental to its function a higher level of care should be considered. Interior slab systems for structures are much more costly and intrusive to repair or replace later due to excessive settlements. Thus, these elements warrant a higher level of care. The highest level of performance will be obtained through the same methods discussed in Section 3.2 above for foundation systems, and such methods are suitable if the Owner is unable to accept any risk of slab settlements. However, based on the conditions encountered, we believe that lightly loaded interior slabs (max live load of 100 psf) could utilize lesser improvements and still achieve a suitable level of performance. Such interior, lightly loaded slab systems can be supported on at least 18 inches of properly compacted structural fill separated from the underlying native soils using a woven geotextile. This geotextile will maintain separation of the clay soils from the structural fill and add reinforcement to help aid in the proper compaction of the overlying structural fill. Interior slabs supported as described are not anticipated to realize settlements exceeding ¾-inch. When basement foundations are considered, native gravels may be encountered within the specified 18-inch depth beneath slab systems. Construction can exclude the geotextile when the structural fill beneath slabs extends to native gravels. 4.4 Pavement Systems A pavement section is a layered system designed to distribute concentrated traffic loads to the subgrade. Performance of the pavement structure is directly related to the physical properties of the subgrade soils and the magnitude and frequency of traffic loadings. Pavement design procedures are based on strength properties of the subgrade and pavement materials, along with the design traffic conditions. Based on the preliminary site plan, new asphalt pavements anticipated with this project are limited to access roads between the building within Block 3. No specific information regarding the vehicle use of the pavements has been provided but based on the limited width and our understanding of the intended use of these structures, we have assumed that the vehicle traffic will be primarily passenger type vehicles and that no significant truck traffic will be using these areas. We do anticipate some impact to the existing city streets associated with demolition and new construction activities. However, we have assumed that all replacement areas will match the existing roadway section or the minimum standards require by the City of Bozeman Street Cut Permit and we have not provided recommendations for those repairs at this time. The anticipated subgrade material within Block 3 is soft clay soils and possible fill soils consisting of clayey sand with gravel. These materials are classified as A-6 soils in accordance with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) classification. AASHTO considers this soil type to be a relatively poor subgrade due to the limited drainage properties, reduced strength when wetted, and frost susceptibility. Typical California Bearing Ratio (CBR) values for this type of soil range from 3 to 5 percent when the material can be properly compacted. Laboratory testing was performed on a bulk sample of the native materials to evaluate the CBR. The initial proctor test indicates that the optimum North Central Development Engineering Analysis Bozeman, Montana Page 18 moisture content for compaction of the clay material is approximately 13 percent; however, the average moisture content with clay within the project limits was 21 percent. This indicates that the clay is likely to be well above optimum, which will prevent high levels of subgrade compaction from being achieved, which will, in turn, result in a slower CBR value. Using the Proctor curve as a guide, at a moisture content of approximately 21 percent, the maximum compaction that should be achievable is around 87 percent. The CBR test report shown in the appendix, with a value of 3.7 percent, is based on a minimum compaction requirement of 90 percent. However, point one of the tests was at a relative compaction level of 87.2 percent and resulted in a CBR of only 2.5 percent at 0.2-inch penetration. These points most closely match the anticipated conditions during construction; thus, our pavement section has been prepared using a CBR value of 2.5 percent. Given the soft clay soils expected for pavement subgrades, the inclusion of a geotextile between the prepared subgrade and the pavement section gravels is recommended. Various products are available, and some will provide only separation, while others provide reinforcement to help reduce the overall gravel section required. We have included two sections for your consideration using both alternatives. North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 19 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Site Grading and Excavations 1. All topsoil and organic material, asphalt, concrete and related construction debris associated with the demolition of the existing structures should be removed from the proposed building and pavement areas and any areas to receive site grading fill. 2. All fill and backfill should be non-expansive, free of organics, and debris and should be approved by the project geotechnical engineer. The on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil and existing uncontrolled fill materials, are suitable for use as backfill and general site grading fill on this project. All materials should be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness for fine-grained soils and not exceeding 12 inches for granular soils. All materials compacted using hand compaction methods or small walk-behind units should utilize a maximum lift thickness of 6 inches to ensure adequate compaction throughout the lift. All fill and backfill shall be moisture conditioned to near the optimum moisture content and compacted to the following percentages of the maximum dry density determined by a standard proctor test, which is outlined by ASTM D698 or equivalent (e.g. ASTM D4253- D4254). a) Structural Fill Below Foundations (Section 5.2 ONLY) ............... 98% b) Structural Fill Below Slab-on-Grade Construction ...................... 98% c) Exterior Foundation Wall Backfill ................................................. 95% d) Below Paved Areas ..................................................................... 95% e) General Landscaping or Nonstructural Areas ............................. 92% f) Utility Trench Backfill .................................................................... 95% For your consideration, native fine-grained soils are anticipated to be at moistures contents well above the optimum for compaction and significant moisture conditioning of these materials may be required prior to use. This often requires abundant space where the soils can be worked and can be difficult during times of the year when precipitation occurs frequently. Thus, the use of imported materials for backfill may be more cost-effective at times. Furthermore, verification of compaction requires laboratory proctor tests to be performed on a representative sample of the soil prior to construction. These tests can require up to one week to complete (depending on laboratory backlog), and this should be considered when coordinating the construction schedule to ensure that delays in construction or additional testing expense is not required due to laboratory processing times or rush processing fees. 3. Imported structural fill should be non-expansive, free of organics and debris, and conform to the material requirements outlined in Section 02234 of the Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS). All gradations outlined in this standard are acceptable for use on this project; however, conventional proctor methods (outlined in ASTM D698) shall not be North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 20 used for any materials containing less than 70 percent passing the ¾-inch sieve. Conventional proctor methods are not suitable for these types of materials, and the field compaction value must be determined using a relative density test outlined in ASTM D4253- 4254. 4. Develop and maintain site grades, which will rapidly drain surface and roof runoff away from foundation and subgrade soils, both during and after construction. The final site grading shall conform to the grading plan prepared by others to satisfy the minimum requirements of the applicable building codes. 5. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to provide safe working conditions in connection with underground excavations. Temporary construction excavations greater than four feet in depth, which workers will enter, will be governed by OSHA guidelines given in 29 CFR, Part 1926. The soil conditions on site can change due to changes in soil moisture or disturbances to the site prior to construction. Thus, the Contractor is responsible to provide an OSHA knowledgeable individual during all excavation activities to regularly assess the soil conditions and ensure that all necessary safety precautions are implemented and followed. 5.2 Conventional Shallow Foundations on Structural Fill The design and construction criteria below should be observed for a shallow foundation system bearing on properly compacted structural fill extending to native gravels. With this option, the complete removal of the native clay to the gravel surface shall be performed and compacted structural fill installed back to the design footing elevation. Based on the intended configuration of the proposed structures, anticipated demolition and filling of old foundations, and the subsurface conditions encountered, we believe this approach is best suited for most of the proposed structures on this project as discussed in Section 4.2 above. 6. Both interior and exterior footings should bear on properly compacted structural fill extending to approved native gravels. All structural fill shall be placed and compacted in accordance with item 2 above and conform to the material requirements of Item 3. The limits of removal and replacement with compacted structural fill shall extend at least one foot beyond the outer face of the footings in all directions. Footings supported as described should be designed with a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 5,000 psf, and a one-third increase in the bearing pressure is acceptable for consideration of transient load cases. Such construction is expected to realize total settlements of less than ¾-inch with differential settlements of approximately one-half this amount. 7. Footings shall be sized to satisfy the minimum requirements of the applicable building codes while not exceeding the maximum allowable bearing pressure provided in Item 6 above. North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 21 8. Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be placed at least 48 inches below finished exterior grade for frost protection. 9. Lateral loads are resisted by sliding friction between the footing base and the supporting soil and by lateral pressure against the footings opposing movement. For design purposes, a friction coefficient of 0.45 and a lateral resistance pressure of 150 psf per foot of depth are appropriate for foundations bearing on properly compacted structural fill (Item 3) and backfilled with processed and compacted on-site soils. 10. A representative of TD&H Engineering should be retained to observe construction excavations, verify that all excavations have reached suitable native gravels, and verify the placement and compaction of the structural fill in accordance with these recommendations. 11. Ground water may be encountered in some excavations required for the complete removal of the fine-grained soils depending on the time of year and the magnitude of seasonal ground water fluctuations. The Contractor should be prepared to dewater excavations as needed to facilitate the removal of the fine-grained soils and the proper installation and compaction of the subsequent structural fill. 5.3 Conventional Shallow Foundations Over EAP Improved Soils EAP systems may be preferred on limited structures located outside of basement areas of existing structures to be demolished. When used, the EAP design must be performed by a licensed design/build contractor. We would recommend consulting either GeoTech Foundation Company (GTFC – West), First Mark Construction, Keller North America, or Montana Helical Pier for the design and installation of such services. The recommendations below are intended to be preliminary guidelines based on our experience with this system. These recommendations shall not be utilized for final design of the foundation system without being verified by a licensed EAP designer. 12. Both interior and exterior footings should bear on EAP improved soils and be designed using the maximum allowable bearing pressure to be issued by the EAP designer. For preliminary planning purposes, we understand that an allowable soil bearing pressure of approximately 4,000 to 6,000 psf is typical for these systems. EAP elements are anticipated to be 24 to 30 inches in diameter with lengths extending down into the native gravel stratum. However, alternative EAP sizes may be specified by the designer of record based on their analysis. Any compacted gravel specified by the EAP designer as a capping substrate shall be compacted and installed per the EAP designer requirements. 13. Footings shall be sized to satisfy the minimum requirements of the applicable building codes while not exceeding the maximum allowable bearing pressures provided by the EAP designer. North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 22 14. Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be placed at least 48 inches below finished exterior grade for frost protection unless otherwise specified by the EAP designer. 15. Lateral loads are resisted by sliding friction between the footing base and the supporting soil and by lateral pressure against the footings opposing movement. For design purposes, a preliminary friction coefficient of 0.5 is typical of EAP improved soils; however, this value shall be verified by the EAP designer during the final design process. A lateral resistance pressure of 150 psf per foot of depth is appropriate for exterior backfill consisting of processed and compacted on site soils. 16. The EAP designer/installer typically provides their own internal quality control system; however, the International Building Code (IBC) considers EAPs to be a form of deep foundation which require full-time inspection. We recommend that a representative of TD&H Engineering be retained to provide third-party construction observation on a full-time basis during the installation of EAP elements to verify compliance with the design documents. 17. Dewatering systems may be required, as specified by the EAP designer based on the method of construction and element depth planned for the EAP system. 5.4 Foundation Walls 18. Backfill should be selected, placed, and compacted per Item 2 above. Care should be taken not to over-compact the backfill since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the walls. Only hand-operated compaction equipment should be used within 5 feet of foundation walls. 19. Basement walls, when utilized, which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 75 pcf for backfill consisting of processed and moisture conditioned fine-grained soils. If native gravels or structural fill are to be utilized as foundation backfill, a reduced equivalent fluid unit weight of 60 pcf is appropriate. For consideration of seismic forces, a seismic equivalent fluid unit weight of 100 pcf or 80 pcf is appropriate for the increased lateral forces associated with earthquake motions for backfill consisting of processed and moisture conditioned fine-grained soils or native gravels and structural fill, respectively. 20. Exterior footing drains are only required for structures which incorporate a below-grade space (basement, crawlspace, etc.) or any structure in which the interior floor elevation is set lower than the finished exterior grade. North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 23 When required, drains should consist of a minimum 3-inch diameter, geotextile-wrapped, flexible, slotted pipe (ADS) or perforated, SDR 35, 4-inch diameter, PVC drain tile in poorly- graded gravel with geotextile placed at or below exterior footing grade. Drains shall be covered by at least 12 inches of free-draining, open-graded, granular material. The open- graded granular material should be enveloped in a geotextile to prevent the migration of fines. Use of a single piece of geotextile with a full-width lap at the top is preferred; however, two separate pieces of fabric may be used provided a minimum overlap distance of 12 inches is maintained at all joints. Drains should be sloped to the site storm water system. A typical perimeter foundation drain is shown on Construction Standard No. 02801-06C. 21. Due to potential ground water fluctuations, it is recommended that all basement foundation walls be water-proofed in accordance with the applicable sections of the International Building Code (IBC). 5.5 Exterior Concrete Flatwork 22. For normally loaded, exterior concrete flatwork, the fine-grained (clay and silt) soils and limited fill encountered may pose some risk to the performance of these features due to the compressibility and frost susceptibility of these materials. Conventional construction consisting of approximately four to six inches of free-draining, crushed gravel placed beneath the concrete and compacted to the requirements of Item 2 above is considered suitable provided the Owner is aware of and willing to accept the risks associated with this construction method. The magnitude of displacement will vary depending on the depth of the fine-grained soils at the location as well as drainage conditions, irrigation locations, slab loading conditions, and other factors. Slab movements could result in the need for more frequent repair or replacement of the exterior concrete if they become too great. 23. If the Owner desires to reduce the risk of movements beneath exterior slab systems and improve anticipated performance, a variety of measures are possible, and these can be discussed with the design team. Mitigative efforts can range from the use of a greater base course thickness to the complete removal and replacement of the problematic soil. The various options need to be considered by the Owner based on the performance to cost relationship so they can select the most appropriate system for their project. 5.6 Interior Concrete Floor Slabs The recommendations outlined below are the minimum improvements recommended beneath interior slab systems when EAP improvements are considered in lieu of the complete removal and replacement method discussed in Section 5.2. These minimum improvements are intended to achieve a suitable level of slab performance and are not intended to eliminate the risk of slab settlement. North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 24 24. For conventional lightly loaded, interior slab-on-grade construction used in conjunction with EAP improvements beneath foundation systems, slabs should be underlain by a minimum of 18 inches of properly compacted structural fill (Items 2 and 3), which is separated from the underlying native soils by a woven Mirafi RS 580i geotextile. The native fine-grained soils are anticipated to be at elevated moistures which are not conducive to compaction; thus, subgrade preparation should be limited to removing excess soil debris to provide a smooth surface on which the geotextile can be installed. Any washed rock or similar material desired beneath the slabs for plumbing installation would be in addition to the specified structural fill thickness. If native gravels are encountered within the minimum depth of the structural fill (i.e. basement slabs), the geotextile may be omitted, and the structural fill thickness reduced to that required to reach the native gravels. 25. Concrete floor slabs should be designed using a modulus of vertical subgrade reaction no greater than 125 pci when designed and constructed as recommended in Item 24 above. 26. Geotechnically, an underslab vapor barrier is recommended beneath all basement slabs on this project due to the potential for ground water fluctuations and proximity to elevated soil moistures. A vapor barrier is normally used to limit the migration of soil gas and moisture into occupied spaces through floor slabs. The need for a vapor barrier in other applications beyond full-depth basements should be determined by the architect and/or structural engineer based on interior improvements and/or moisture and gas control requirements. 5.7 Pavements 27. The following pavement section or an approved equivalent section should be selected in accordance with the discussions in the Engineering Analysis. North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 25 Table 5 – Recommended Asphalt Sections Pavement Component Component Thickness Option 1 - Separation Option 2 - Reinforcing Asphaltic Concrete Pavement 3” 3” Crushed Base Course 6” 6” Crushed Subbase Course 21” 12” Geotextile Type Separation (Item 31) Reinforcing (Item 32) Total 30” 21” ** The pavement sections summarized above have not considered vehicle loads associated with construction activities and are not intended to be utilized by the Contractor during construction for access to concrete trucks, cranes, or other heavy equipment. Additional assessment of improvements to support such traffic would be needed and is beyond the scope of this report. 28. Final pavement thicknesses exceeding 3 inches shall be constructed in two uniform lifts. 29. Crushed base courses shall conform to the material properties outlined in Section 02235 of the Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS). All gradations outlined in this specification are acceptable for this application based on the local availability and contractor preference. Crushed subbase courses shall conform to material properties outlined in Section 02234 of the MPWSS. All gradations outlined in this specification are acceptable for this application based on local availability and contractor preference. 30. Where the existing grades will be raised more than the thickness of the pavement section, all fill should be placed, compacted, and meet the general requirements given in Item 2 above. This may require moisture conditioning if native soils are used for general site grading fill. 31. The first option shown in Table 5 above utilizes a standard separation geotextile between the fine-grained subgrade and the gravels associated with the pavement section. This material is not intended to add strength to the section to reduce gravel thicknesses and is only utilized to keep the two materials separate and help ensure the long-term drainage properties of the gravels. The use of a Mirafi 180N is recommended for this application, and the gravel thickness shown in Option 1 above. North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 26 32. The subbase thickness shown in Table 5 above for Option 2 reflects the increased stability and reinforcement provided by a high modulus reinforcing geotextile. With this option, the use of a Mirafi RS580i is appropriate for the subgrade conditions and the gravel section thicknesses outlined above. 33. Prior to geotextile installation for either option, the subgrade must be cleared of all loose soil and statically rolled to provide a smooth, relatively level surface. Alternative geotextiles or geogrids other than those called out in Items 31 and 32 above must be evaluated individually and may result in increased subbase thickness to achieve a similar level of performance. 34. Ideally, the asphaltic cement should be a Performance Graded (PG) binder having the following minimum high and low-temperature values based on the desired pavement reliability. Reliability Min. High Temp Rating Min. Low Temp Rating Ideal Oil Grade 50% 33.8 -30.6 PG 52-34 98% 37.5 -39.4 PG 52-40 However, based on our experience, neither of these materials are available through local suppliers, and significant additional expense would be realized using these products. Thus, we recommend the use of a PG 58-28 oil for any asphalt pavement included in this project. Of the locally available products, this material will provide the highest level of performance in our climatic conditions. 5.8 Continuing Services Three additional elements of geotechnical engineering service are important to the successful completion of this project. 35. Consultation between the geotechnical engineer and the design professionals during the design phases is highly recommended. This is important to ensure that the intentions of our recommendations are incorporated into the design and that any changes in the design concept consider the geotechnical limitations dictated by the on-site subsurface soil and ground water conditions. 36. Observation, monitoring, and testing during construction is required to document the successful completion of all earthwork and foundation phases. A geotechnical engineer from our firm should be retained to observe the excavation, earthwork, and foundation phases of the work to determine that subsurface conditions are compatible with those used in the analysis and design. If construction services are performed by someone other than our firm, the entities performing these services must be directed to contact us immediately upon North Central Development Recommendations Bozeman, Montana Page 27 changes in subsurface conditions so we may re-evaluate our recommendations in a timely manner. 37. During site grading, placement of all fill and backfill should be observed and tested to confirm that the specified density has been achieved. We recommend that the Owner maintain control of the construction quality control by retaining the services of an experienced construction materials testing laboratory. We are available to provide construction inspection services as well as materials testing of compacted soils and the placement of Portland cement concrete and asphalt. In the absence of project-specific testing frequencies, TD&H recommends the following minimum testing frequencies be used: Compaction Testing Beneath Column Footings 1 Test per Footing per Lift Beneath Wall Footings 1 Test per 50 LF of Wall per Lift Beneath Slabs 1 Test per 1,500 SF per Lift Foundation Backfill 1 Test per 100 LF of Wall per Lift Parking Lot & Access Roads 1 Test per 2,500 SF per Lift LF = Lineal Feet SF = Square Feet North Central Development Summary of Field & Laboratory Studies Bozeman, Montana Page 28 6.0 SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDIES 6.1 Field Explorations The field exploration included two separate geotechnical investigations. A preliminary site investigation was conducted on May 21 and 22, 2019. A total of four borings were drilled and completed as monitoring wells during this preliminary study. The boring depths ranged from 28.5 to 31.2 feet at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1 to observe subsurface soil and ground water conditions. Subsequently, on September 15 through 17, 2020, a final site investigation consisting of ten additional borings was performed. Borings for this investigation were drilled to depths of 28.5 to 31.8 feet. The borings for both investigations were advanced through the subsurface soils using a truck-mounted Mobile B-61 drill rig equipped with 8-inch hollowstem augers. All borings were logged by Mr. Craig Nadeau, PE of TD&H Engineering. The location and elevation of the borings were recorded using a Trimble handheld GPS unit. The locations shown on Figure 1 are accurate to within approximately 18 inches of the actual field location; however, elevations can vary by approximately three feet (plus/minus) with GPS methods. The elevations reported for the borings are based on the Geoid12A (Conus) datum. These elevations require confirmation by other means and adjustment to the appropriate project datum prior to utilizing the reported values in any design or construction applications. Samples of the subsurface materials were taken using 1⅜-inch I.D. split spoon samplers. The samplers were driven 18 inches, when possible, into the various strata using a 140-pound drop hammer falling 30 inches onto the drill rods. For each sample, the number of blows required to advance the sampler each successive six-inch increment was recorded, and the total number of blows required to advance the sampler the final 12 inches is termed the penetration resistance (“N-value”). This test is known as the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) described by ASTM D1586. Penetration resistance values indicate the relative density of granular soils and the relative consistency of fine-grained soils. Logs of each soil boring, which include soil descriptions, sample depths, and penetration resistance values, are presented on the Figures 2 through 15. Measurements to determine the presence and depth of ground water were made in the borings by lowering an electronic water sounder through the open boring or auger shortly after the completion of drilling. The depths or elevations of the water levels measured if encountered, and the date of measurement are shown on the boring logs. Subsequent ground water monitoring data is summarized in the report. 6.2 Laboratory Testing Samples obtained during the field exploration were returned to our materials laboratory, where they were observed and visually classified in general accordance with ASTM D2487, which is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Representative samples were selected for North Central Development Summary of Field & Laboratory Studies Bozeman, Montana Page 29 testing to determine the engineering and physical properties of the soils in general accordance with ASTM or other approved procedures. Tests Conducted: To determine: Natural Moisture Content Representative moisture content of soil at the time of sampling. Grain-Size Distribution Particle size distribution of soil constituents describing the percentages of clay/silt, sand and gravel. Atterberg Limits A method of describing the effect of varying water content on the consistency and behavior of fine-grained soils. Consolidation Measurements of the percent compression experienced under various loading conditions. For use in settlement analysis and foundation design. Unconfined Compression Undrained shear strength properties of cohesive soils determined in the laboratory by axial compression. Moisture-Density Relationship A relationship describing the effect of varying moisture content and the resulting dry unit weight at a given compactive effort. Provides the optimum moisture content and the maximum dry unit weight. Also called a Proctor Curve. California Bearing Ratio The measure of a subgrade’s or granular base’s ability to resist deformation due to penetration during a saturated condition. Used to assist in pavement thickness designs. The overall laboratory testing program between both investigations consisted of 117 moisture- visual analyses, 20 sieve (grain-size distribution) analyses, and 10 Atterberg Limits analyses. The results of the water content analyses are presented on the preliminary boring logs, Figures 2 through 15. The grain-size distribution curves and Atterberg limits are presented on Figures 16 through 45. In addition, five consolidation tests, two unconfined compression tests, one proctor (moisture-density) test, and one California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test were performed. The consolidation and unconfined compression results are presented on Figures 46 through 52. The CBR and moisture density relationship are shown on Figures 53 and 54. North Central Development Limitations Bozeman, Montana Page 30 7.0 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The findings, analyses, and recommendations contained in this report reflect our professional opinion regarding potential impacts the subsurface conditions may have on the proposed project and are based on site conditions encountered. Our analysis assumes that the results of the exploratory borings are representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site, that is, that the subsurface conditions everywhere are not significantly different from those disclosed by the subsurface study. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered and cannot be fully determined by a limited number of soil borings and laboratory analyses. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that some additional expenditures be made to obtain a properly constructed project. Therefore, some contingency fund is recommended to accommodate such potential extra costs. The recommendations contained within this report are based on the subsurface conditions observed in the borings and are subject to change pending observation of the actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction. TD&H cannot assume responsibility or liability for the recommendations provided if we are not provided the opportunity to perform limited construction inspection and confirm the engineering assumptions made during our analysis. A representative of TD&H should be retained to observe all construction activities associated with subgrade preparation, foundations, and other geotechnical aspects of the project to ensure the conditions encountered are consistent with our assumptions. Unforeseen conditions or undisclosed changes to the project parameters or site conditions may warrant modification to the project recommendations. Long delays between the geotechnical investigation and the start of construction increase the potential for changes to the site and subsurface conditions, which could impact the applicability of the recommendations provided. If site conditions have changed because of natural causes or construction operations at or adjacent to the site, TD&H should be retained to review the contents of this report to determine the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations provide considering the time-lapse or changed conditions. Misinterpretation of the geotechnical information by other design team members is possible and can result in costly issues during construction and with the final product. Our geotechnical engineers are available upon request to review those portions of the plans and specifications which pertain to earthwork and foundations to determine if they are consistent with our recommendations and to suggest necessary modifications as warranted. This service was not included in the original scope of the project and will require additional fees for the time required for specification and plan document review and comment. In addition, TD&H should be involved throughout the construction process to observe construction, particularly the placement and compaction of all fill, preparation of all foundations, and all other geotechnical aspects. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who prepared your geotechnical report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. North Central Development Limitations Bozeman, Montana Page 31 This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Owner and architect and/or engineer in the design of the subject facility. It should be made available to prospective contractors and/or the Contractor for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions such as those interpreted from the boring logs and presented in discussions of subsurface conditions included in this report. Prepared by: Reviewed by: Craig Nadeau PE Kyle Scarr PE Geotechnical Manager Regional Office Manager TD&H ENGINEERING TD&H ENGINEERING 1 B O R I N G L O C A T I O N M A P B O Z E M A N , M O N T A N A N O R T H C E N T R A L G E O T E C H CJS 9/29/20B20-068 FIGURE ?? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? B-5ELEV.= 4799.9 B-6ELEV.= 4798.4 B-7ELEV.= 4801.2 B-8ELEV.= 4802 B-4ELEV.= 4802.1 B-1ELEV.= 4798 B-9ELEV.= 4797.5 B-10ELEV.= 4801.5 B-2ELEV.= 4796.5 B-3ELEV.= 4799.9 B-11ELEV.= 4805.9 B-12ELEV.= 4801.4 B-13ELEV.= 4801.5 B-14ELEV.= 4803.4 ³ 0 40 8020 Feet 1 8 0 0 R I V E R D R . N O . • G R E A T F A L L S , M O N T A N A 5 9 4 0 1 J :\2 0 2 0 \B 2 0 -0 6 8 N o r t h C e n t r a l G e o t e c h \C A D D \C I V I L \B 2 0 -0 6 8 B O R I N G S .m x d B20-068 BORINGS.MXD DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:QUALITY CHECK:DATE DRAWN:JOB NO.:FIELDBOOK: R E V D A T E R E V I S I O N 4 0 6 .7 6 1 .3 0 1 0 • t d h e n g i n e e r i n g .c o m ?BORING LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION Service Layer Credits: U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Services Agency Aerial Photography Field Office.National Geographic, Esri, Garmin, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp. 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Sandy Lean CLAY, appears soft, brown, moist Sandy Lean CLAY, very soft, brown, moist Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, medium dense to very dense, brownish gray, slightly moist to wet 0.5 8.2 1-1-1 7-13-9 12-50/ 5" 50/5" 50/5" 50/5" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-1SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 22, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 2 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,798.0 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring - Piezometer Installed 28.5 14-23- 45 50/6" 68 50/6" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-1SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 22, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 2 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,798.0 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Sandy Lean CLAY, appears soft, dark brown, moist Sandy Lean CLAY, soft, dark brown to brown, moist, some sand, roots to about 6.0 feet qu = 1.0 - 1.5 tsf Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, medium dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.5 7.9 2-1-2 2-2-3 6-8-6 6-41-17 50/3" 58 50/3" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-2SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 21-22, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 3 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,796.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring - Piezometer Installed 30.5 9-26-50 22-50/ 2" 50/5" 76 50/2" 50/5" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-2SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 21-22, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 3 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,796.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Sandy Lean CLAY, appears soft, dark brown, moist Sandy Lean CLAY, very soft to firm, dark brown to brown, moist qu = 1.0 - 1.5 tsf Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, medium dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.5 9.5 1-1-1 3-3-3 1-1-6 10-11- 13 12-17- 20 LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-3SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 21, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 4 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,799.9 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring - Piezometer Installed Clayey SAND, medium dense, brown, wet 30.8 31.2 10-15-9 37-42- 47 24-10- 13 89 LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-3SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 21, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 4 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,799.9 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Sandy Lean CLAY, appears soft, dark brown, moist Sandy Lean CLAY, soft to firm, dark brown to brown, moist Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.5 7.0 2-3-4 2-2-1 17-17- 27 17-47- 18 50/5" 65 50/5" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-4SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 21, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 5 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,802.1 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 - Clayey SAND lense from 20.0 to 21.0 feet Bottom of Boring - Piezometer Installed 30.5 6-7-43 16-28- 35 50/5" 63 50/5" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-4SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. May 21, 2019 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 5 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Lawn SURFACE ELEVATION:4,802.1 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 Asphalt Pavement Poorly-Graded GRAVEL with Sand (Base Course), relatively dense, brown, slightly moist Sandy Lean CLAY, very soft, brown to dark brown, moist qu = 1.0 tsf - See Figures 46 and 48 for Unconfined Compression and Consolidation Test Results Clayeye GRAVEL with Sand, medium dense to very dense, brown, slightly moist to wet 0.3 2.0 7.9 2-1-1 PUSH 3-6-14 23-21- 22 40-12- 13 T LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-5SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 6 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,799.9 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 - 6" of heaved sand in augers prior to sampling Bottom of Boring 31.3 50/2.5" 50/4" 11-24- 50/3" 50/2.5" 50/4" 74/9" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-5SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 6 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,799.9 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Sandy Lean CLAY, appears soft to firm, dark brown, moist Sandy Lean CLAY, appears firm to stiff, dark brown moist, scattered gravels - See Figures 53 and 54 for Proctor and CBR Test Results Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, grayish brown, slightly moist to wet, up to 4" cobbles observed 0.5 4.0 4-6-10 BULK 13-18- 21 17-27- 20 13-26- 23 13-13- 24 G LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-6SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 7 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,798.4 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring 31.4 13-16- 23 22-50/ 5" 14-32- 50/4" 50/5" 82/10" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-6SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 7 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,798.4 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 Asphalt Pavement Poorly-Graded GRAVEL with Sand, relatively dense, brown, moist Sandy Lean CLAY, soft, brown, moist qu = 1.5 tsf - See Figure 49 for Consolidation Test Result Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.3 2.0 6.0 4-2-2 PUSH 15-20- 47 42-50/ 2" BULK 13-21- 14 T G 67 50/2" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-7SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 8 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.2 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring 31.5 19-22- 36 22-50/ 5" 36-45- 47 58 50/5" 92 LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-7SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 8 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.2 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 Asphalt Pavement Poorly-Graded GRAVEL with Sand, relatively dense, brown, moist Lean CLAY with Sand, soft to firm, light brown, moist Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.2 2.0 6.5 3-3-2 3-3-3 20-30- 36 25-50/ 3" 15-30- 31 66 50/3" 61 LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-8SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 9 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,802.0 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring 31.0 27-38- 50/4" 10-14- 18 36-50/ 5" 88/10" 50/5" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-8SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 15, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 9 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,802.0 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 Asphalt Pavement Poorly-Graded GRAVEL with Sand, relatively dense, brown, moist Sandy Lean CLAY, firm to stiff, grayish brown, moist - See Figures 47 and 50 for Unconfined Compression and Consolidation Test Results Clayey SAND with Gravel, loose, brown, slightly moist Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, grayish brown, moist to wet 0.5 2.5 6.0 9.0 2-4-5 PUSH 3-4-4 16-29- 25 20-13- 16 T 54 LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-9SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 10 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,797.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 - Zone of medium dense clayey sand from approximately 25 to 26 feet Bottom of Boring 30.8 7-15-26 9-17-37 32-50/ 4" 54 50/4" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-9SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 10 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,797.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 Asphalt Pavement Poorly-Graded GRAVEL with Sand, relatively dense, brown, moist FILL: Lean CLAY with Sand, firm, dark brown, moist, some gravel, brick and wood fragments - See Figures 53 and 54 for Proctor and CBR Test Results FILL: Clayey SAND with Gravel, dense, gray and brown, slightly moist, suspected concrete debris Lean CLAY with Sand, firm, brown, moist - Pushed rock with tip of spoon qu = 1.0 - 2.0 tsf Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.3 1.5 3.3 6.6 12.0 3-24-33 BULK 12-50/ 6" 2-2-3 2-2-3 18-14- 16 G 57 50/6" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-10SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 11 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 - Stiff clay seam from 27 to 28 feet Bottom of Boring 31.5 20-20- 30 32-50/ 4" 13-26- 34 50/4" 60 LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-10SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 11 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Lean CLAY with Sand, appears firm, brown, slightly moist, scattered gravels Sandy SILT, firm to stiff, brown, slightly moist, scattered gravels Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, medium dense to very dense, brown, slightly moist to wet 0.5 7.0 3-4-5 4-3-3 6-6-8 10-12- 16 19-50/ 1"50/1" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-11SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 12 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Boulevard Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,805.9 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring 31.8 26-33- 50 27-50/ 6" 25-42- 50/4" 83 50/6" 92/10" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-11SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 12 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Boulevard Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,805.9 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 Asphalt Pavement Poorly-Graded GRAVEL with Sand, relatively dense, brown, slightly moist Lean CLAY with Sand, soft to firm, dark gray, moist - See Figure 51 for Consolidation Test Result Clayey SAND, relatively loose, brown, moist Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.3 0.5 6.5 8.0 2-1-2 PUSH 2-3-13 10-14- 16 21-23- 19 T LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-12SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 13 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.4 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring 31.1 50/6" 43-42- 54 27-36- 50/1" 50/6" 96 86/7" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-12SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 16, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 13 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Asphalt Parking Lot SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.4 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Lean CLAY with Sand, appears firm, brown, slightly moist Sandy Lean CLAY, firm, brown, slightly moist Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, medium dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.5 8.1 4-3-2 4-4-3 4-13-11 15-15- 10 20-20- 23 BULK LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-13SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 17, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 14 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 Bottom of Boring 31.5 50/6" 6-32- 50/5" 35-47- 25 G 50/6" 82/11" 72 LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-13SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 17, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 14 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,801.5 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 TOPSOIL: Lean CLAY with Sand, appears firm, brown, slightly moist Sandy Lean CLAY, firm, brown, slightly moist - Scattered gravels from 3.0 to 4.5 feet - See Figure 52 for Consolidation Test Result Clayey SAND, medium dense, grayish brown, slightly moist, some gravel Clayey GRAVEL with Sand, dense to very dense, brown, moist to wet 0.5 7.0 9.0 2-11-9 PUSH 7-4-6 21-14- 24 14-25- 20 T LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-14SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 17, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 15 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,803.4 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 1 of 2 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 - Seam of sandy lean clay from approximately 19.5 to 20.5 feet Bottom of Boring 31.2 4-17-26 16-31- 50/4" 10-24- 50/2" 81/10" 74/8" LEGEND LOG OF SOIL BORING B-14SPT blows per foot Atterberg Limits Field Moisture content North Central Development Bozeman, MontanaGroundwater Level Grab/composite sample 1-3/8-inch I.D. split spoon Logged by:Craig Nadeau, PE 2-1/2-inch I.D. split spoon Drilled by:O'Keefe Drilling Truck-mounted Mobile B-61 with 8-inch HSA2-1/2-inch I.D. ring sampler GNP = Granular and Nonplastic 3-inch I.D. thin-walled sampler Note: The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual or transitional. September 17, 2020 B20-068-001 No sample recovery Figure No. 15 Sheet GR A P H I C LO G SOIL DESCRIPTION SURFACE:Irrigated Sod SURFACE ELEVATION:4,803.4 feet DE P T H ( F T ) GR O U N D WA T E R SP T B L O W CO U N T S SA M P L E DE P T H ( F T ) PENETRATION RESISTANCE/MOISTURE CONTENT 0 10 20 30 40 50 = BLOWS PER FOOT = MOISTURE CONTENT 2 of 2 Tested By: KR Checked By: 7-10-2019 16 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 96.8 92.3 84.5 79.9 67.7 51.3 35.7 25.9 21.4 19.0 17.6 13.8 16.9188 13.0762 3.1588 1.8695 0.5906 0.0950 SC Report No. A-19585-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-1 Sample Number: A-19585 COMP Depth: 13.0 - 28.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 7.7 24.6 16.4 25.4 12.1 13.8 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 7-10-2019 17 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Sandy Lean CLAY 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 99.2 97.8 93.9 88.4 83.3 78.2 73.9 70.3 67.8 58.4 2.5701 1.1188 0.0846 Report No. A-19589-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-2 Sample Number: A-19589 Depth: 2.5 - 4.0 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 6.1 5.5 10.2 19.8 58.4 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: JS Checked By: 7-12-2019 18 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 96.4 89.7 80.1 76.3 65.6 55.1 45.9 37.4 31.6 28.1 26.1 20.6 19.2488 15.9171 3.1236 1.2292 0.2150 SC Report No. A-19592-206 Composite Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-2 Sample Number: A-19592 COMP Depth: 10.0 - 30.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 10.3 24.1 10.5 17.7 16.8 20.6 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 7-10-2019 19 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 98.7 96.1 92.0 85.8 81.9 79.7 76.3 69.5 63.9 45.6 3.5408 1.7531 0.1316 0.0900 SC Report No. A-19598-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-3 Sample Number: A-19598 Depth: 5.0 - 6.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 8.0 6.2 6.1 34.1 45.6 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 7-10-2019 20 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 97.2 91.9 82.9 79.2 67.0 55.5 45.8 37.4 31.7 27.9 25.9 20.2 17.5669 14.1455 2.9500 1.2177 0.2152 SC Report No. A-19601-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-3 Sample Number: A-19601 COMP Depth: 15.0 - 30.8 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 8.1 24.9 11.5 18.1 17.2 20.2 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 7-10-2019 21 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 97.8 97.0 95.6 94.1 92.6 88.9 81.6 73.5 67.6 46.9 0.4889 0.3043 0.1178 0.0837 SC Report No. A-19605-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-3 Sample Number: A-19605 Depth: 30.8 - 31.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.5 5.2 42.0 46.9 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: KR Checked By: 7-10-2019 22 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 93.4 86.4 79.7 75.6 66.1 55.8 45.9 37.1 32.1 29.0 27.2 22.0 22.0867 17.8452 2.8886 1.1895 0.1996 Report No. A-19608-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-4 Sample Number: A-19608 COMP Depth: 7.5 - 30.4 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 13.6 20.3 10.3 18.7 15.1 22.0 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: TF Checked By: 9-29-2020 23 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 97.5 93.5 88.5 83.8 71.1 56.7 40.0 28.1 23.6 21.2 19.9 16.4 14.2148 10.2085 2.4271 1.4008 0.4894 SC Report No. A-21719COMP-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-5 Sample Number: A-21719 Comp Depth: 10.0 - 20.2 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 6.5 22.4 14.4 28.6 11.7 16.4 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: NJJ Checked By: 9-29-2020 24 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 98.8 96.3 89.2 84.2 75.3 68.2 63.8 59.4 55.5 52.8 51.1 45.9 23 41 18 13.2404 9.9949 0.4662 0.1320 SC A-7-6(5) Report No. A-21725COMP-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-6 / B-10 Sample Number: A-21725 Comp Depth: 2.0 - 5.0 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 3.7 21.0 7.1 8.8 13.5 45.9 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 9-29-2020 25 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Sandy Lean CLAY #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 99.9 99.7 98.1 93.8 88.3 83.8 65.9 0.1953 0.1573 CL Report No. A-21733-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-7 Sample Number: A-21733 Depth: 2.5 - 4.0 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.8 32.2 65.9 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC/NJ Checked By: 10-6-2020 26 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey GRAVEL with Sand 3" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 97.8 89.5 82.2 68.0 59.5 43.2 33.0 26.8 22.1 19.3 17.6 16.5 13.7 25.9004 21.0487 9.7172 6.5814 1.3400 0.1085 GC Report No. A-21737-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-7 Sample Number: A-21737 Depth: 10.0 - 11.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 17.8 39.0 10.2 10.9 8.4 13.7 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 9-29-2020 27 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Lean CLAY with Sand 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 97.7 95.9 94.4 93.6 93.1 92.5 91.5 90.1 88.8 80.5 0.1766 0.1049 CL Report No. A-21743-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-8 Sample Number: A-21743 Depth: 5.0 - 6.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.8 1.1 12.0 80.5 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 9-29-2020 28 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Sandy Lean CLAY 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 98.4 98.4 98.0 97.0 95.9 94.3 90.9 86.0 81.6 64.4 0.2298 0.1720 CL Report No. A-21750-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-9 Sample Number: A-21750 Depth: 2.5 - 4.0 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.7 29.9 64.4 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: NJJ Checked By: 9-30-2020 29 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 99.2 94.4 89.9 76.6 61.1 48.3 38.2 30.1 24.6 21.7 14.7 9.5805 7.2717 1.8619 0.9554 0.2484 0.0784 SC Report No. A-21751-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-9 Sample Number: A-21751 Depth: 6.0 - 7.0 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.8 22.6 15.5 22.9 23.5 14.7 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: TF Checked By: 9-29-2020 30 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 96.6 91.1 86.0 83.0 78.4 73.5 68.6 61.4 52.6 45.0 37.2 22.0 17.8141 11.5965 0.3878 0.2155 0.1209 SC Report No. A-21756COMP-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-9 Sample Number: A-21756 Comp Depth: 25.0 - 30.8 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 8.9 12.7 4.9 12.1 39.4 22.0 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 9-29-2020 31 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Sandy SILT 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 99.8 98.4 94.9 90.4 84.9 79.4 75.2 60.2 0.4050 0.2528 ML Report No. A-21769-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-11 Sample Number: A-21769 Depth: 5.0 - 6.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.4 8.0 30.2 60.2 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 9-29-2020 32 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND with Gravel 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 96.5 92.9 83.9 80.0 71.7 62.6 54.6 45.3 35.8 28.3 24.0 16.0 16.5997 13.3962 1.4910 0.5844 0.1936 SC Report No. A-21774COMP-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-11 Sample Number: A-21774 Comp Depth: 25.0 - 31.8 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 7.1 21.2 9.1 17.3 29.3 16.0 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: WJC Checked By: 9-29-2020 33 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey SAND 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 98.2 96.3 92.4 84.7 76.0 67.0 60.1 55.0 51.7 42.0 3.4723 2.0608 0.2485 0.1356 SC Report No. A-21778-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-12 Sample Number: A-21778 Depth: 7.0 - 8.0 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 0.0 7.6 7.7 17.7 25.0 42.0 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: TF Checked By: 9-24-20 34 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey GRAVEL with Sand 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 90.7 80.4 71.1 63.1 49.9 36.9 28.5 23.5 20.5 18.7 17.5 14.2 24.8488 21.6951 8.4070 4.7957 1.0188 0.0903 GC Report No. A-21779COMP-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-12 Sample Number: A-21779 COMP Depth: 10.0 - 20.5 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 19.6 30.5 13.0 13.4 9.3 14.2 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: NJJ/TF Checked By: 10-8-2020 35 (no specification provided) PL= LL= PI= D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= USCS= AASHTO= * Clayey GRAVEL with Sand 3" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #80 #100 #200 100.0 95.0 87.0 80.3 73.4 69.8 63.6 55.2 47.9 41.8 37.4 34.6 32.9 27.4 29.0685 23.3821 3.2413 1.0882 0.1062 GC Report No. A-21790-206 Homebase Partners North Central Development Bozeman, Montana B20-068-001 Material Description Atterberg Limits Coefficients Classification Remarks Location: B-13 Sample Number: A-21790 Depth: 15.0 - 20.0 ft Date: Client: Project: Project No: Figure SIEVE PERCENT SPEC. *PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) PE R C E N T F I N E R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 110 100 % +3" Coarse % Gravel Fine Coarse Medium % Sand Fine Silt % Fines Clay 0.0 19.7 16.7 8.4 13.4 14.4 27.4 6 i n . 3 i n . 2 i n . 1½ i n . 1 i n . ¾ i n . ½ i n . 3/ 8 i n . #4 #1 0 #2 0 #3 0 #4 0 #6 0 #1 0 0 #1 4 0 #2 0 0 Particle Size Distribution Report Tested By: MS Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 32.8 33.2 33.6 34 34.4 34.8 35.2 35.6 36 36.4 36.8 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-1 Sample Number: A-19582 Depth: 3.0 - 4.5 ft Figure Sandy Lean CLAY 35 21 14 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 36 Report No. A-19582-207 Date: 7-10-2019 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: MS Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 34.4 34.8 35.2 35.6 36 36.4 36.8 37.2 37.6 38 38.4 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-2 Sample Number: A-19590 Depth: 5.0 - 6.5 ft Figure Sandy Lean CLAY 36 23 13 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 37 Report No. A-19590-207 Date: 7-10-2019 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: MS Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 35.6 36 36.4 36.8 37.2 37.6 38 38.4 38.8 39.2 39.6 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-3 Sample Number: A-19599 Depth: 7.5 - 9.0 ft Figure Sandy Lean CLAY 38 21 17 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 38 Report No. A-19599-207 Date: 7-10-2019 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: BC Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 35 35.4 35.8 36.2 36.6 37 37.4 37.8 38.2 38.6 39 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-4 Sample Number: A-19607 Depth: 5.0 - 6.5 ft Figure Sandy Lean CLAY 37 18 19 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 39 Report No. A-19607-207 Date: 7-11-2019 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: WJC Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 34.8 35.2 35.6 36 36.4 36.8 37.2 37.6 38 38.4 38.8 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-5 Sample Number: A-21715 Depth: 2.5 - 4.0 ft Figure Sandy Lean CLAY 37 22 15 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 40 Report No. A-21715-207 Date: 9-29-2020 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: NJJ Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 39.2 39.6 40 40.4 40.8 41.2 41.6 42 42.4 42.8 43.2 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-6 / B-10 Sample Number: A-21725 Comp Depth: 2.0 - 5.0 ft Figure Clayey SAND with Gravel 41 23 18 59.4 45.9 SC B20-068- Homebase Partners 41 Report No. A-21725COMP-207 Date: 9-30-2020 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: NJJ Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 31.1 31.3 31.5 31.7 31.9 32.1 32.3 32.5 32.7 32.9 33.1 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-8 Sample Number: A-21742 Depth: 2.5 - 4.0 ft Figure Lean CLAY with Sand 32 20 12 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 42 Report No. A-21742-207 Date: 9-24-20 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: NJJ Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 35.3 35.5 35.7 35.9 36.1 36.3 36.5 36.7 36.9 37.1 37.3 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-10 Sample Number: A-21762 Depth: 7.5 - 9.0 ft Figure Sandy Lean CLAY 36 21 15 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 43 Report No. A-21762-207 Date: 9-23-20 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: NJJ Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 46.7 47.2 47.7 48.2 48.7 49.2 49.7 50.2 50.7 51.2 51.7 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-11 Sample Number: A-21768 Depth: 2.5 - 4.0 ft Figure Sandy SILT 49 30 19 ML B20-068- Homebase Partners 44 Report No. A-21768-207 Date: 9-29-2020 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: WJC Checked By: LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 CL-ML C L o r O L C H o r O H ML or OL MH or OH Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils 47 WA T E R C O N T E N T 39.6 40 40.4 40.8 41.2 41.6 42 42.4 42.8 43.2 43.6 NUMBER OF BLOWS 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 25 30 40 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-13 Sample Number: A-21785 Depth: 5.0 - 6.5 ft Figure Sandy Lean CLAY 42 25 17 CL B20-068- Homebase Partners 45 Report No. A-21785-207 Date: 9-29-2020 North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Tested By: CRN Checked By: UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST Project No.: B20-068-001 Date Sampled: 9-15-2020 Remarks: Report No. A-21716-215 Date: 9-29-2020 Figure 46 Client: Homebase Partners Project: North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Location: B-5 Sample Number: A-21716 Depth: 5.0 - 7.0 ft Description: Sandy Lean CLAY LL = PI = PL = Assumed GS= 2.7 Type: Shelby Tube Sample No. Unconfined strength, psf Undrained shear strength, psf Failure strain, % Strain rate, in./min. Water content, % Wet density, pcf Dry density, pcf Saturation, % Void ratio Specimen diameter, in. Specimen height, in. Height/diameter ratio 1 2773 1386 0.9 0.019 18.9 117.1 98.4 71.7 0.7126 2.82 5.61 1.99 Co m p r e s s i v e S t r e s s , p s f 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Axial Strain, % 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1 Tested By: CRN Checked By: UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST Project No.: B20-068-001 Date Sampled: 9-16-2020 Remarks: Report No. A-21751-215 Date: 9-29-2020 Figure 47 Client: Homebase Partners Project: North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Location: B-9 Sample Number: A-21751 Depth: 5.0 - 6.0 ft Description: Sandy Lean CLAY LL = PI = PL = Assumed GS= 2.7 Type: Shelby Tube Sample No. Unconfined strength, psf Undrained shear strength, psf Failure strain, % Strain rate, in./min. Water content, % Wet density, pcf Dry density, pcf Saturation, % Void ratio Specimen diameter, in. Specimen height, in. Height/diameter ratio 1 1865 933 1.1 0.020 23.0 113.1 91.9 74.6 0.8335 2.80 5.61 2.00 Co m p r e s s i v e S t r e s s , p s f 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Axial Strain, % 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1 Sat. Moist Project No. B20-068-002 HomeBase Partners Remarks: Project: North Central Geotech Investigation Report No. A-21716-219 Bozeman, Montana Location: B-5 Sample Depth (ft): 5.0 - 7.0 48 Technician : CRN Reviewed By: Client: Figure CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT AASHTO ----- USCS CL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sandy Lean CLAY Natural Dry Density (pcf) LL PI Swell (%) eo Sp. Gr. Overburden (psf) Pc (psf) Cc 0.031 0.006 Cs Swell Pressure (psf) ----- ----- 0.708 77.8 20.4 98.4 ----- ----- 2.7 710 ~ 2,000 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 100 1000 10000 Pe r c e n t S t r a i n Applied Pressure - psf Sat. Moist Project No. B20-068-002 HomeBase Partners Remarks: Project: North Central Geotech Investigation Report No. A-21734-219 Bozeman, Montana Location: B-7 Sample Depth (ft): 5.0 - 6.0 49 ----- 0.789 74.5 21.8 93.9 ----- ----- 2.7 620 ~ 2,000 0.1 0.008 Cs Swell Pressure (psf) ----- Overburden (psf) Pc (psf) Cc CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT AASHTO ----- USCS CL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sandy Lean CLAY Natural Dry Density (pcf) LL PI Swell (%) eo Sp. Gr. Technician : CRN Reviewed By: Client: Figure 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 100 1000 10000 Pe r c e n t S t r a i n Applied Pressure - psf Sat. Moist Project No. B20-068-002 HomeBase Partners Remarks: Project: North Central Geotech Investigation Report No. A-21751-219 Bozeman, Montana Location: B-9 Sample Depth (ft): 5.0 - 6.0 50 ----- 0.892 69.5 23.0 88.8 ----- ----- 2.7 600 ~ 2,000 0.107 0.008 Cs Swell Pressure (psf) ----- Overburden (psf) Pc (psf) Cc CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT AASHTO ----- USCS CL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sandy Lean CLAY Natural Dry Density (pcf) LL PI Swell (%) eo Sp. Gr. Technician : CRN Reviewed By: Client: Figure 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 100 1000 10000 Pe r c e n t S t r a i n Applied Pressure - psf Sat. Moist Project No. B20-068-002 HomeBase Partners Remarks: Project: North Central Geotech Investigation Report No. A-21777-219 Bozeman, Montana Location: B-12 Sample Depth (ft): 5.0 - 7.0 51 ----- 1.017 82.5 31.1 83.3 ----- ----- 2.7 650 ~ 2,000 0.207 0.015 Cs Swell Pressure (psf) ----- Overburden (psf) Pc (psf) Cc CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT AASHTO ----- USCS SC MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clayey SAND Natural Dry Density (pcf) LL PI Swell (%) eo Sp. Gr. Technician : CRN Reviewed By: Client: Figure 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 100 1000 10000 Pe r c e n t S t r a i n Applied Pressure - psf Sat. Moist Project No. B20-068-002 HomeBase Partners Remarks: Project: North Central Geotech Investigation Report No. A-21795-219 Bozeman, Montana Location: B-14 Sample Depth (ft): 5.0 - 7.0 52 ----- 0.640 74.4 17.6 102.5 ----- ----- 2.7 720 ~ 2,000 0.05 0.007 Cs Swell Pressure (psf) ----- Overburden (psf) Pc (psf) Cc CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT AASHTO ----- USCS CL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sandy Lean CLAY Natural Dry Density (pcf) LL PI Swell (%) eo Sp. Gr. Technician : CRN Reviewed By: Client: Figure 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 100 1000 10000 Pe r c e n t S t r a i n Applied Pressure - psf Tested By: MS Checked By: Moisture-Density Test Report Dr y d e n s i t y , p c f 95 100 105 110 115 120 Water content, % - Rock Corrected - Uncorrected 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 12.8%, 115.6 pcf 15.2%, 109.4 pcf ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.70 Test specification: ASTM D4718-15 Oversize Corr. Applied to Each Test Point ASTM D 698-12 Method B Standard 2.0 - 5.0 ft SC A-7-6(5) 2.7 41 18 15.8 45.9 Clayey SAND with Gravel B20-068- Homebase Partners Report No. A-21725COMP-204 Date: 9-30-2020 53 Elev/ Classification Nat. Sp.G. LL PI % > % < Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. 3/8 in. No.200 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Project No. Client: Remarks: Project: Location: B-6 / B-10 Sample Number: A-21725 Comp Figure 109.4 pcf Maximum dry density = 115.6 pcf 15.2 % Optimum moisture = 12.8 % North Central Development Bozeman, Montana BEARING RATIO TEST REPORT ASTM D 1883-07 Project No: B20-068-001 Project: North Central Development Bozeman, Montana Location: B-6 / B-10 Sample Number: A-21725 Comp Depth: 2.0 - 5.0 ft Date: 9-29-2020 Clayey SAND with Gravel Test Description/Remarks: ASTM D698 with 6-inch mold 96-hour soak prior to testing Report No. A-21725COMP-210 Date: 10-8-2020 Figure 54 115.6 12.8 41 18 SC Material Description USCS Max. Dens. (pcf) Optimum Moisture (%) LL PI Molded Density (pcf) Percent of Max. Dens. Moisture (%) Soaked Density (pcf) Percent of Max. Dens. Moisture (%) CBR (%) 0.10 in. 0.20 in. Linearity Correction (in.) Surcharge (lbs.) Max. Swell (%) 1 100.8 87.2 11.4 100.5 87 21.3 3.1 2.5 0.000 10 0.3 2 110.6 95.7 12.6 109.9 95.1 16.6 9.0 7.9 0.000 10 0.6 3 116.8 101 11.6 116.0 100.4 15.1 14.6 15.3 0.001 10 0.7 Pe n e t r a t i o n R e s i s t a n c e ( p s i ) 0 70 140 210 280 350 Penetration Depth (in.) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Sw e l l ( % ) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Elapsed Time (hrs) 0 24 48 72 96 CB R ( % ) 0 5 10 15 20 Molded Density (pcf) 95 100 105 110 115 120 10 blows 25 blows 56 blows CBR at 90% Max. Density = 3.7% for 0.20 in. Penetration QUALITY CHECK: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CAD NO. JOB NO. DATE: 02801-06C Engineering tdhengineering.com CONSTRUCTION STANDARD NO. 02801-06C PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAIN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION RLT CRN MMJ 5/21/15 FIGURE