HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-01-21 Public Comment - L. Yurga & B. Bell - Canyon GateFrom:Ross Knapper
To:L Yurga
Cc:Agenda
Subject:RE: Question on Canyon Gate 21337 application summary form - there are 2 forms - please clarify
Date:Wednesday, November 3, 2021 4:03:27 PM
Hello Lori,
Thank you for your inquiry. I have sent a message to the applicant to have them review their mailing
lists and to be sure the mailing is sent to all property owners as required, including the applicable
open space lots. You may want to ensure that your HOA is properly registered with the state and has
a current mailing address listed. The mailing is not required to be mailed to the individual members
of the HOA, only a notice to the association itself as the property owner of the open space.
The A1 application with the growth plan amendment box checked was an error on the applicants
part. No portion of the application as submitted requires a growth policy amendment and the A1
form has been corrected and the applicant will be mailing a revised notice to applicable owners this
week. The zoning districts proposed by the applicant are consistent with the future land use
designations of Community Commercial Mixed Use and Residential Mixed Use. Below is a link to the
Community Plan; page 52 starts with general descriptions of the future land use categories and page
58 illustrates the existing zoning districts and how they correlate to the future land use categories.
Residential mixed use includes R-3, R-4, R-5 and REMU districts. Commercial Community Mixed Use
includes REMU and B-2M.
https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=229109&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN
I am not able to comment on the REMU portion you reference, other than an applicant may request
any applicable zoning district with the ZMA application. There has been no growth policy
amendment issued and therefore no documents to view. If you would like to research other REMU
areas in the city, as well as areas of the city with a B2-M and R-1 transition zone, you can use the
Community Development Viewer to view current and recently approved projects along with zoning
district overlays across the City. The Black Olive (16432) is one of the more recent that I can think of.
https://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=planning
Best,
Ross Knapper | Development Review Coordinator, Community DevelopmentCity of Bozeman | 20 East Olive St. | P.O. Box 1230 | Bozeman, MT 59771406.582.2968 | (C) 406.451.6803 | rknapper@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
The Department of Community Development is revising its operations until further notice to address COVID-19. We
appreciate your patience and are working hard to maintain the stability of our operations. There may be delays in
responding to inquiries. We continue to receive and review development applications. Some application types may
see delays in their review times due to the suspension of public meetings.
From: L Yurga <yellowstone.my@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 2:50 PM
To: Ross Knapper <rknapper@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Question on Canyon Gate 21337 application summary form - there are 2 forms - please
clarify
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello Ross, We hope you can help us with a question about the project 21337. We are studying the related 21337 documents and community plan and future land use plan,UDC, zoning criteria and others in preparation to send our comments on the project. We live in Legends II, adjoining contiguous property owners with our HOA open space, sowill be directly impacted by the project (we asked Jacob Miller about notification and he saidthe HOA would have been notified as one entity, but we don't see it listed on the adjoiningcontiguous list - could you clarify please). We notice that the documents show 2 Application Summaries:One shows the Community Commercial Mixed Use, and Residential Mixed Use with zoningto be determined and a box checked for growth plan amendment. This is the one that went outwith the notice. The other shows Urban Neighborhood, Community Commercial Mixed Use and ResidentialMixed Use and zoning requested as B2M REMU R5 and R3, and does not have the growthplan amendment box checked. If this is the correct form, should it have gone out with thepublic notice, not the other one? When we review the 2020 future land use map it does not show any Urban Neighborhood forthe area, just Commercial Community Mixed Use and Residential Mixed Use, so would thisbe a growth plan amendment? On a map in the application narrative we can see that REMU was designated for a 0.77 acrearea outlined as Urban Neighborhood with an entrance suggested from Bridger Canyon Roadbut the REMU designation suggests it should be used on 5 acres or more. Is there somethingspecific in mind here? Was a growth plan amendment already issued - is there anydocumentation we could review for that? Could you provide an example in Bozeman ofREMU on this type of acreage that exists now, the category is very broad and it would help usto understand the project. Also was there any B2M project built or planned this close to R1 inBozeman, we would review that also to understand this project.
Thanks for any help you can provide to clarify our review, we appreciate the decision makingprocess!
Lori Yurga and Bruce Bell
1782 Medicine Wheel Lane