The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-01-21 Planning Board Agenda & Packet MaterialsA.Call Meeting to Order B.Disclosures C.Changes to the Agenda D.Approval of Minutes D.1 Approval of meeting minutes from October 18th, 2021.(Happel) E.Public Comment Please state your name and address in an audible tone of voice for the record.This is the time for THE PLANNING BOARD OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA PB AGENDA Monday, November 1, 2021 WebEx Meeting Information Via Webex: https://cityofbozeman.webex.com/cityofbozeman/onstage/g.php? MTID=efc9d7cfcf602c0a2b5579e9061aa49c9 Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit. Click Join Now to enter the meeting Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream or channel 190 • Call-in toll number (US/Canada ): 1-650-479-3208 • Access code: 2554 365 6376 Public Comment: If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda, please send an email to agenda@bozeman.net prior to 4:00pm on Monday, November 1st, 2021. You may also comment by visiting the City's public comment page. You can also comment by joining the Webex meeting. If you do join the Webex meeting, we ask you please be patient in helping us work through this online meeting. If you are not able to join the Webex meeting and would like to provide oral comment you may send a request to agenda@bozeman.net with your phone number, the item(s) you wish to comment on, and someone will call you during the meeting to provide an opportunity to comment. You may also send the above information via text to 406-224-3967. As always, the meeting will be streamed through the City's video page (click the Streaming Live in the drop down menu), and available in the City on cable channel 190. 1 individuals to comment on matters falling within the purview of the Committee.There will also be an opportunity in conjunction with each action item for comments pertaining to that item.Please limit your comments to three minutes. F.Action Items F.1 Mountains Walking GPA, 21318(Hyde) G.FYI/Discussion G.1 One Valley Community Foundation Seat at the Table civil discourse initiative sponsorship request.(None) H.Adjournment For more information please contact Tom Rogers at trogers@bozeman.net This board generally meets the 2nd and 4th Monday of each month from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM Committee meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and require assistance, please contact our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray at 582-3232 (TDD 582-2301). 2 Memorandum REPORT TO:Planning Board FROM:Taylor Chambers - Community Development Technician II SUBJECT:Approval of meeting minutes from October 18th, 2021. MEETING DATE:November 1, 2021 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Minutes RECOMMENDATION:I move to approve the meeting minutes from October 18th, 2021. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.2 Community Engagement: Broaden and deepen engagement of the community in city government, innovating methods for inviting input from the community and stakeholders. BACKGROUND:None UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:1. Approve meeting minutes with corrections. 2. Do not approve meeting minutes. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: 10-18-21 Planning Board Meeting Minutes DRAFT.pdf Report compiled on: October 28, 2021 3 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, 10-18-21 Page 1 of 4 THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA MINUTES Monday, October 18, 2021 00:00:07 WebEx Meeting Information A) 00:03:26 Call Meeting to Order Present: Henry Happel, Cathy Costakis, Gerald Pape, Matthew Hausauer, Jennifer Madgic, Nicole Olmstead Absent: Richard Rudnicki, George Thompson B) Disclosures C) 00:04:10 Changes to the Agenda D) 00:04:15 Approval of Minutes D.1 Approval of Minutes from October 4th, 2021 10-04-21 Planning Board Meeting Minutes DRAFT.pdf 00:04:28 Motion D) Approval of Minutes Gerald Pape: Motion Cathy Costakis: 2nd 00:04:37 Vote on the Motion to approve D) Approval of Minutes. The Motion carried 6 - 0 Approve: Henry Happel Cathy Costakis Gerald Pape Matthew Hausauer Jennifer Madgic Nicole Olmstead 4 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, 10-18-21 Page 2 of 4 Disapprove: None E) 00:04:48 Public Comment Sean Casto (1461 Boyland rd) commented in opposition of the Canyon Gate project that will be coming before the Planning Board in the coming weeks. Daniel Gaugler (158 Boyland rd.) commented in opposition of the Canyon Gate Annexation application that will be before the Planning Board in the coming weeks. F) 00:14:22 Action Items F.1 00:14:26 Subdivision Review Procedures And Associated Development Standards Update Text Amendment, Ordinance 2089, Application 21338 21338 PB staff Report.pdf Ord. 2089 Revised Text for Subdivision Process - Public Hearing draft 10-1-2020.pdf 00:14:39 Staff Presentation City Planner Chris Saunders presented Ordinance 2089 - Subdivision Process Text Amendment to the Board and recommended that the amendment met the criteria for approval. 00:33:29 Board Questions Board members directed questions to staff. 01:04:32 Public Comment Opportunity. No public Comment Opportunities. 01:09:42 Board Discussion Chairman Happel commented that he would like to make a revision to the proposed motion language presented to the Board. Board member Olmstead commented that the goal for the revised ordinance were still unclear and requested additional information be made available to the public. 01:14:36 Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 21338 and move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2089. Matthew Hausauer: Motion Cathy Costakis: 2nd Board member Hausauer spoke to his motion. 5 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, 10-18-21 Page 3 of 4 Board member Costakis spoke to her second. 01:17:48 Friendly Amendment: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt except as provided below the findings presented in the staff report for application 21338. I dissent from the finding that the proposed amendments are wholly in accordance with the growth policy in as much as they terminate the City's inclusionary housing ordinance. I find that this termination is inconsistent with the City's adopted growth policy in particular goal N-1.1 which states an objective of the policy is to "promote housing diversity" I nonetheless move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2089. Henry Happel: Motion Gerald Pape: 2nd Board member Costakis commented that she was in agreement with Chairman Happel's amendment. 01:19:56 Vote on the Motion to amend Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt except as provided below the findings presented in the staff report for application 21338. I dissent from the finding that the proposed amendments are wholly in accordance with the growth policy in as much as they terminate the City's inclusionary housing ordinance. I find that this termination is inconsistent with the City's adopted growth policy in particular goal N-1.1 which states an objective of the policy is to "promote housing diversity" I nonetheless move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2089. The Motion carried 6 - 0 Approve: Henry Happel Cathy Costakis Gerald Pape Matthew Hausauer Jennifer Madgic Nicole Olmstead Disapprove: None 01:21:00 Vote on the Motion to approve as amended: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 21338 and move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2089. The Motion carried 6 - 0 Approve: Henry Happel Cathy Costakis Gerald Pape Matthew Hausauer Jennifer Madgic Nicole Olmstead Disapprove: 6 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes, 10-18-21 Page 4 of 4 None F.2 01:21:11 Continued Discussion of the Clarion Report on the Bozeman Code Audit to Create and Preserve Housing and Development of Recommendations. 01:21:36 Board Discussion Chairman Happel gave a brief introduction to the Clarion report and opened the floor for Board discussion of the recommendations previously presented to the Board by the Clarion team. Board members took turns providing their thoughts and comments on the Clarion recommendations. Chairman Happel proposed that the Board should submit a recording of the meeting video to the Clarion team in lieu of a written recommendation. 02:07:22 Motion The Planning Board requests that the Community Development forward the portion of the video of the meeting that deals with the second agenda item which is discussion of the Clarion report to Clarion as the best indication provided concerning the Board's comments on the housing affordability assessment. Henry Happel: Motion Jennifer Madgic: 2nd 02:08:31 Vote on the Motion to approve The Planning Board requests that the Community Development forward the portion of the video of the meeting that deals with the second agenda item which is discussion of the Clarion report to Clarion as the best indication provided concerning the Board's comments on the housing affordability assessment. The Motion carried 6 - 0 Approve: Henry Happel Cathy Costakis Gerald Pape Matthew Hausauer Jennifer Madgic Nicole Olmstead Disapprove: None G) 02:09:18 FYI/Discussion Chairman Happel informed the Board that he will not be present for the November 15th Board meeting. H) 02:10:37 Adjournment For more information please contact Tom Rogers at trogers@bozeman.net. This board generally meets the 2nd and 4th Monday of each month from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM. 7 Memorandum REPORT TO:Planning Board FROM:Marty Matsen, mmatsen@bozeman.net Lynn Hyde, lhyde@bozeman.net SUBJECT:Mountains Walking GPA, 21318 MEETING DATE:November 1, 2021 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby move to adopt the findings presented in the staff report and recommend approval to the City Commission of the growth policy amendment application 21318 with contingencies and subject to all applicable code provisions. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:Gustav Dose (landowner), 414 N. Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT, 59715, and Allied Engineering Services, Inc. (applicant), 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT, request to amend the Bozeman Community Plan (Growth Policy) future land use designation from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use on approximately 0.244 acres developed with a single household structure. The site is addressed as 414 N Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715. Discussion and criteria for deciding on this growth policy application are limited to those in this report. Other elements of the future development will be addressed separately in the future. There have been numerous public comments received regarding this project both in favor and against. Written comments are available at the below link. Many commenters have merged comments on this growth policy amendment with the zone map amendment application Mountains Walking 21319 which follows this growth policy amendment, thus the public comments have been combined into one folder to ensure all commenters are entered into the record. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx? id=256275&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN UNRESOLVED ISSUES:There are no identified conflicts between the City and Applicant regarding 8 the zoning at this time. ALTERNATIVES:1. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non- compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 2. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS:There are no fiscal effects identified at this time. Attachments: 21318 Mountains Walking GPA_SR_PlanningBoard.pdf 21318 Mountains Walking GPA Resolution of Intent.pdf GPA Development Review Application (Form A1) 2021_07_29.pdf GPACoverLetter_08032021.pdf GPANarrativeAndFigures_08032021.pdf GPAFutureLandUseMap_08032021.pdf GPAExhibitOfProperty_08032021.pdf Report compiled on: October 26, 2021 9 Page 1 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). Public Hearing Dates: Planning Board November 01, 2021. Meeting to be held electronically. Details available on the Planning Board agenda. City Commission November 23, 2021. Meeting may be held electronically or in the City Commission room, City Hall, 121 North Rouse. Details available on the City Commission agenda. Project Description: A growth policy amendment to revise the future land use map from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use for approximately .244 acres. Project Location: The property is addressed as 414 N Plum Avenue and legally described as Lots 18, 19 & 20 of Northern Pacific Addition, Section 07, Township 02 South, Range 06 East, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT. Recommendation: Meets standards for approval Planning Board Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby move to adopt the findings presented in the staff report and recommend approval to the City Commission of the growth policy amendment application 21318 with contingencies and subject to all applicable code provisions. City Commission Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, Planning Board recommendation, and all the information presented, I hereby move to adopt the findings presented in the staff report and to approve the growth policy amendment with contingencies and subject to all applicable code provisions. Report: October 27, 2021 Staff Contact: Lynn Hyde, Development Review Planner Agenda Item Type: Action – Legislative 10 Page 2 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues There are no identified conflicts between the City and Applicant regarding the zoning at this time. Project Summary Gustav Dose (landowner), 414 N. Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT, 59715, and Allied Engineering Services, Inc. (applicant), 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT, request to amend the Bozeman Community Plan (Growth Policy) future land use designation from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use on approximately 0.244 acres developed with a single household structure. The site is addressed as 414 N Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715. Discussion and criteria for deciding on this growth policy application are limited to those in this report. Other elements of the future development will be addressed separately in the future. There have been numerous public comments received regarding this project both in favor and against. Written comments are available at the below link. Many commenters have merged comments on this growth policy amendment with the zone map amendment application Mountains Walking 21319 which follows this growth policy amendment, thus the public comments have been combined into one folder to ensure all commenters are entered into the record. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=256275&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN Planning Board Planning Board will hold their public hearing on November 01, 2021. Upon completion of the public hearing a link to the hearing will be inserted. Alternatives 1. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 2. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 11 Page 3 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 2 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................. 2 Project Summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Planning Board .................................................................................................................. 2 Alternatives ........................................................................................................................ 2 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES........................................................................................................ 4 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL ........................................ 7 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS ............................................... 7 SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS .................................................................... 7 APPENDIX A - PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY ......................................... 17 APPENDIX B - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ......................... 21 APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ........................................................... 22 APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF .................................... 23 12 Page 4 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES Map 1: Aerial view of existing area 13 Page 5 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). Map 2: View of existing area Future Land Use Map designations, Bozeman Community Plan 14 Page 6 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). Map 3: Proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map, Bozeman Community Plan, changing the subject property from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed-Use 15 Page 7 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL 1. The Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant provides an editable metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor. 2. All required materials shall be provided to the Department of Community Development within 60 days of a favorable action of the City Commission or any approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS Having considered the criteria established for a growth policy map amendment, the Staff recommends approval with contingencies for the application as submitted. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the amendment on September 19, 2021 and did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints that would impede the approval of the application at this time. The Planning Board will hold a public hearing on November 01, 2021 to make a recommendation to the City Commission for the growth policy map amendment. Once they have made a recommendation it will be included here. The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the growth policy map amendment on November 23, 2021. The hearing begins at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be held electronically via WebEx. Instructions for joining the meeting will be included on the meeting agenda. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Amendments may be initiated three ways: 1) City Commission; independently or at the suggestion of the Planning Board or the City Staff; 2) One or more landowner of property that are the subject of the amendment to the future land use map; and 3) Interested members of the public may suggest modifications to the text. For this application it is number 2, a landowner of property is initiating the amendment. In considering applications for approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission must consider the following 16 Page 8 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). criteria(1-4). In making these findings, they may identify that there are some negative elements within the specific criteria however the final balance must be found to be a positive outcome for approval. As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. Chapter 5, Page 67, Bozeman Community Plan Amendment Criteria. 1. The proposed amendment must cure a deficiency in the growth policy, or improve the growth policy, to better respond to the needs of the general community; Yes. This criterion contains two alternate parts. A favorable finding for either part supports a positive finding. Staff first reviewed the proposed for its ability to cure a deficiency. It does not appear the proposed amendment is intended to cure a deficiency in the growth policy. The second part is to better respond to the needs of the general community. The applicant is proposing this land use change as a response to the needs of the community by providing additional commercial space and housing opportunities. Currently the property has an Urban Neighborhood Land Use which includes multiple zoning designations supporting a variety of densities in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities and does not support commercial. The property is more specifically zoned R-2, Residential Moderate Density District which does not allow more than two household structures on a lot (could also contain an ADU if sufficient lot size exists). The applicant is proposing Community Commercial Mixed Use through this growth policy amendment and if approved, a subsequent Zone Map Amendment requesting B-2M, community business district – mixed. This new land use designation (and subsequent zone map amendment) would allow an expansion of commercial uses and additional housing types. See municipal code Division 38.310 for the authorized uses in residential districts (Section 030) and for the authorized uses in the commercial districts (Section 040). The following goals, objectives, and actions from the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan have been found in support of this growth policy amendment. Theme 2: A CITY OF UNIQUE NEIGHBORHOODS Goal N-1.1: Support well-planned, walkable neighborhoods. 17 Page 9 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). N-1.1.LU-2: Promote housing diversity including missing middle housing. Discussion: The change in land use and subsequent zoning change would allow alternative housing types that are not necessarily affordable by definition, but are more affordable due to the size and scale of the units. Additional housing, including a variety of types has been and continues to be a need and priority for the city of Bozeman. Goal N-2: Pursue simultaneous emergence of commercial nodes and residential development through diverse mechanisms in appropriate locations. N-2.3. Investigate and encourage development of commerce concurrent with, or soon after, residential development. Actions, staff, and budgetary resources relating to neighborhood commercial development should be given a high priority. Discussion: As discussed in this goal, concurrent commercial with residential opportunities is a goal found within the Community Plan. The applicant’s proposal to change the land use to Community Commercial Mixed Use directly supports a mix of housing and employment opportunities or destinations for residents to walk to. However it should be noted that there is existing commercial opportunities in this neighborhood, and some neighbors have commented they do not wish to see the proposed land use extended into the existing residential land use. Goal N-3: Promote a diverse supply of quality housing units. N-3.8: Promote the development of “Missing Middle housing (side by side or stacked duplex, triplex, live-work, cottage housing, group living, rowhouses/townhouses, etc.) as one of the most critical components of affordable housing. Discussion: The applicant has stated one of the motivators behind these request is to provide employee housing which is increasing difficult to find in Bozeman. The current zoning district of R-2 does not allow more than a two household unit on a lot. While there is no certainty the applicant will move forward with the development, even if the land use designation is approved, the change in land use would allow additional space in the city for these “Missing Middle” types of housing. THEME 3: A CITY BOLSTERED BY DOWNTOWN AND COMPLEMENTARY DISTRICT Goal DCD-2: Encourage growth throughout the City, while enhancing the pattern of community development oriented on centers of employment and activity. Support an increase in development intensity within developed areas. 18 Page 10 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). Discussion: The proposed change in land use would support an increase in development intensity within an already developed area, also referred to as infill. This goal focuses on development oriented on centers of employment and activity. This neighborhood has historically been a mix of residential and commercial activity, including multiple breweries recently opening up. The change in land use to Community Commercial Mixed Use would create the opportunity for an infill development of increased intensity within an already developed commercial node. The below diagram found within the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan identifies the implementing zoning districts of the current and proposed land use designation. Both allow for several different zoning districts that authorize a wide range of possible future development. There are no zoning districts which are limited to only one type of development. The expansiveness and intensity allowed varies between districts. The change to Community Commercial Mixed Use facilitates the potential for a variety of commercial services on the site as well as more traditional multi-household structures. Neither designation requires development to occur on any particular schedule or sequence. Public comments have been received expressing concerns about possible impacts to adjacent property owners if the requested amendment is approved. A growth policy is a balance of many different views of what is good and appropriate for the community as a whole and smaller areas within it. The potential negative impacts are discussed further in Criteria 4.d. Without question, development of adjacent vacant property impacts already developed property. Those impacts may be negative, positive, or a mix of both negative and positive. Individuals may have divergent opinions on whether any development is an asset or injury depending on how they individually weight issues of concern. To give weight to all 19 Page 11 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). the various priorities of the community requires that not every issue be maximized to the detriment of others. As shown in the citation above and throughout the Bozeman Community Plan the City has many areas of interest and concern that must be considered. Advancing those goals as a whole may impact some citizens more than others. To enable consideration of possibly conflicting interests the City has established the growth policy amendment process and criteria. The process enables affected parties to express their support or concern, seek information, and be heard before any decision is made. This process enables consideration necessary to meet the required fair and proper balance, protect rights, and affirm community values. Staff finds that the amendment improves the growth policy and better responds to the needs of the general community by providing the greater possibility of needed services in proximity to new and existing residential development. In addition, the applicant states, “Changing the future land use designation for the lot to Community Commercial Mixed Use will better meet the needs of the general community by allowing for expansions of the current Mountains Walking Brewery. Expansion of the brewery will provide an easily accessible gathering place for the community to come together, enjoy craft beer, and make good conversation. The expansion will also provide employee housing on the upper floor which is an excellent way to meet the needs of employees who struggle to find affordable housing in Bozeman. In addition, the new future land use designation promotes redevelopment by converting the existing residential property into a multi-use lot. Multi-use properties help promote diverse uses of land in very close proximity to one another which ultimately reduces traffic congestion on the roads and the air pollution associated with motor travel. Redevelopment, as opposed to new development, saves time, money, and resources by connecting to existing utilities. In this case, adequate water, drainage, transportation, and sanitary facilities will be provided via existing utilities located in Plum Avenue. 2. The proposed amendment does not create inconsistencies within the growth policy, either between the goals and the maps or between different goals and objectives. Staff reviewed the growth policy goals and objective and future land use map. The proposed amendment to change .244 acres from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use does not create any identified inconsistencies within the growth policy goals or between goals and maps. See discussion for Criterion 1. 20 Page 12 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). The Growth Plan states the ‘Future land use is the community’s fundamental building block. It is an illustration of the City’s desired outcome to accommodate the complex and diverse needs of its residents.’ The change and subsequent rezoning would allow for commercial and or mixed-use development applications to be pursued and reviewed by the City of Bozeman. Given this relatively small site in an already developed neighborhood, the potential infill opportunity would be relatively small in scale to the city, albeit may be large to existing neighbors. However, the existing commercial node makes it a logical location to expand commercial and provide employing housing opportunities. The character of the district has historically been and continues to be a mix of diverse uses. The existing uses to the north of the property are industrial with higher intensity uses on them and the railroad location adjacent to the neighboring properties to the north. The uses to the south and west are less dense residential on smaller lots with a more historic grid pattern of development. Thus, the subject property lies between residential (less intense land use development), and the more intense industrial use to the north. As a result, the proposed zoning designation would result in a land use suitable for the adjacent neighborhoods. The land use designation of the Community Commercial Mixed Use parcels to the north were previously designated as Industrial. During the 2020 Community Plan update, the City Commission received a public comment (01-06-20 Public Comment – B. Caldwell ThinkTank Design Group Growth Policy Change Proposal) that recommended replacing the previous Industrial land use designation with Community Commercial Mixed Use. The Commission acted on this public comment, which is how the land use designation evolved to what it is today to the north, and what the applicant is requesting for the subject parcel. All future development must demonstrate compliance with all regulatory standards addressing transportation, parks, building design, and all other standards. The standards have been crafted and adopted to implement the goals and objectives of the growth policy. Therefore, compliance with the standards will ensure this criterion is met. 3. The proposed amendment must be consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy. 21 Page 13 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). The overall intent of the growth policy is to proactively and creatively address issues of development and change while protecting public health, safety and welfare. If approved, the proposed amendment to the future land use map will allow the entirety of the subject property to be considered for future applications with commercial or multi-household units. The applicant has indicated they hope to expand their existing brewery to the north and add employee housing, however that is not being reviewed at this time, nor is that development guaranteed even with the approval of this land use designation request. Regardless, the change will allow more space for neighborhood design that incorporates nodes of commercial development directed at the local neighborhood, with less day-to-day reliance upon the larger commercial hubs around Bozeman that are more distant. The growth policy discusses that at a minimum, zoning districts should follow property boundaries. The greater the physical separation, the less likely there may be a conflict. The growth policy goes on to state that a local street, typically 60 feet wide, when combined with the standards for site development is generally adequate separation. There is a pre-existing condition today that has two zoning districts separated by only a property boundary. This subject parcel is bordered to the west by a public street, to the east by an alley, and to the north by a property with the desire land use designation (therefore not applicable). The rights of way present assist in the separation, however to the south it is adjacent to a property with a lower intensity designation, thus relying on the zone edge transitions found within the Bozeman Municipal Code which require additional setbacks and or building setbacks as the height increases (see Criterion 4.d for a full discussion on zone edge transition). The Commission has adopted these standards acknowledging that although it is preferable to have a street at the zoning district boundary, conditions do exist where two different land uses and zoning districts are adjacent to one another, therefore relying on code provisions to mitigate potentially conflicting building forms. Future development would be required to meet this zone edge transition. 4. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the community as a whole or significant portion thereof by: a) Significantly altering land use patterns and principles in a manner contrary to those established by this Plan, No, the proposed amendment does not significantly alter land use patterns in a manner contrary to those established by this plan. This amendment is for .244 acres, thus a relatively small amount of land that would be extending an already existing use. 22 Page 14 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). The change in land use would allow a more intense development of the .244 acres. Because this property is bordered to a property to the south with a less intense land use and zoning district, it does create uses and bulk and dimensional standards that may be incompatible. The adjacency condition already exists on site with the current M-1 (light manufacturing) district to the north adjacent to R-2 (moderate density residential) district on the subject property, however the proposal would push the boundary further to the south. In addition, currently this adjacency condition happens between two parcels owned by the same property owner, thus controlling the development on either site. With the proposed change, the boundary is pushed further south and is between two different property owners (not controlling the development on both sites). It is essentially an existing condition that is being pushed slighting to the south and thus affecting different properties and owners. b) Requiring unmitigated improvements to streets, water, sewer, or other public facilities or services, thereby impacting development of other lands, No negative impacts to other lands or the community are anticipated as a result of the proposed growth policy amendment. The site is provided vehicular access from Plum Ave and via an alley. The project location is within the planned service area for municipal utilities. The applicant adds, “Adequate water will be provided by the City’s existing municipal system. Figure 6-7 in the Water Facility Plan details the existing water distribution system and shows that the area surrounding the proposed development has an acceptable level of head loss, indicating there is adequate capacity to provide water for the development. Adequate fire flow will provided by Hydrant #45. According to Table 5.7 in the Water Facility Plan, a zone designation of B-2 (concurrent ZMA proposing zoning change to B-2M) needs 3,000 gpm of flow for 3 hours to fulfill fire protection requirements. According to Figure 6-8 of the Water Facility Plan, the available fire flow for the proposed development area is 4,000 – 5,000 gpm, which confirms that suitable fire flow for fire protection is met. Adequate sewer will also be provided by the City’s existing municipal system. According to City’s design criteria, sewer pipes that have a depth of flow to pipe diameter (d/D) ratio exceeding 0.75 are considered potentially deficient. Figure 4-8 of the Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan Update (2015) shows that the sewer pipes servicing the proposed development and surrounding area all have a depth of flow to pipe diameter (d/D) ratio less than 0.75, indicating that there is adequate wastewater capacity for proper sewage disposal. Transportation access will remain primarily unchanged. Access is anticipated to be provided via principal arterial Rouse Ave and collector streets Peach 23 Page 15 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). St and Broadway Ave, but can also be accessed by other local streets such as Plum Ave or on foot/bike. The proposed future land use is not anticipated to have a significant change or additional burden to public facilities. The anticipated site improvements are consistent with other uses in the area.” The site has a Walk Score of 60, a Transit score of 21, and Bike Score of 67. Average walk score for the city as a whole is 48 out of 100. These values are provided by Walk Score, a private organization which presents information on real estate and transportation through walkscore.com. The algorithm which produces these numbers is proprietary. A score is not an indication of safety or continuity of services or routes. Scores are influenced by proximity of housing, transit, and services and expected ability, as determined by the algorithm, to meet basic needs without using a car. Sites located on the edge of the community have lower scores than those in the center of the community as the area is still under development and therefore diversity of uses is less than in fully established areas. There are no adopted A wide range of possible intensity of development can occur depending on the implementing zoning district applied, and all zoning districts have a significant variety of development possibilities. Therefore, exact needs for future infrastructure cannot be predicted at this time. Future development requires municipal review for any additional impacts and will be evaluated at that time. Therefore, there is no evidence that unmitigated improvements will be required as a result of this amendment. c) Adversely impact existing uses because of inadequately mitigated impacts on facilities or services, or No adverse impacts have been identified at this time. Additional review will occur during site development and mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts will be addressed at that time, as required by municipal code (also see Criterion 4.b discussion above on existing infrastructure). This approach enables mitigation to be proportionate to the proposed development as required by law. The development review committee has reviewed the proposed land use designation and did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints that would impede the approval of the application at this time. d) Negatively affecting the health and safety of the residents. 24 Page 16 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). The historical character of the neighborhood has been a mix of residential, industrial, and commercial that has been built up for over 100 years. As discussed in Criterion 1 above the growth policy contemplates a mix of uses in the city and commercial services within a walkable range of residential neighborhoods. This industrial, commercial and residential mix exists today in this neighborhood, however this change does move the commercial uses and land use boundary slightly further to the south. Public comment has mentioned negative effects of the existing user and concern of potential expansion issues. These concerns include, but are not limited to, noise pollution, existing and added traffic, parking, storage of materials, deliveries, and future development bulk and dimension adjacent to residential users. While it may be a slight increase in the commercial area, the impact to the adjacent neighbors is of concern and must be noted and considered during the review and discussion. The Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) has adopted standards that aim to reduce negative offsite impacts of developments. While many provisions other than what is discussed below will apply to future development, a few have been pulled out for discussion purposes. The zone edge transitions previously mentioned in Criterion 3 above aim to reduce the impacts of adjacent zoning districts of differing intensities and allowable form and intensity standards. As mentioned, if the land use designation is recommended, the applicant is requesting a B-2M zoning district. The allowable height for B-2M is 60 feet or 5 stories, whichever is less. The allowable height for R-2 is 40 feet for a pitched roof and 30 feet for a flat roof. The zone edge transitions require developments in B-2M to be setback 10’ and have the building angle away equal to or greater than 45 degrees from the residential property at a height of 38’. These provisions were implemented as the Commission is aware there are locations in town where these zoning designations are adjacent to one another. In addition, as this project is located within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District, all future development will be required to follow the Bozeman Guidelines for Historic Preservation & the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District guidelines. Other applicable provisions include the requirement that outdoor storage areas, service areas and mechanical equipment are required to be screened with structural and landscaping elements. Future expansion will require additional parking commiserate to the size and scale of the any future expansion including any proposed housing units. These rates have been adopted by the city to meet the needs of commercial and multi-household users. 25 Page 17 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). It is understood that the change in land use from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use will provide the owner or any future owner of the property the ability to develop at an increased intensity than the existing land use designation and neighbors to the south, however the Commission has adopted codes and standards that aim to ensure future development throughout the city is done thoughtfully and in harmony with the existing neighborhoods and character of the city. 26 Page 18 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). APPENDIX A - PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The property is currently zoned R-2 (Residential Moderate Density District). The applicant has concurrently applied for a Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) requesting B-2M (Community Business District – Mixed). The ZMA application was be reviewed by the Zoning Commission at a public hearing on October 25, 2021. The Zoning Commission public hearing is viewable here. https://bozeman.granicus.com/player/clip/170?view_id=1&redirect=true The GPA and ZMA applications are anticipated to be reviewed by the City Commission at a public hearing on November 23, 2021 The property has historically been used for residential and is developed with a single household unit. Adopted Growth Policy Designations: The following designations are applicable to this application. Existing – Urban Neighborhood. This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. Applying a zoning district to specific parcel sets the required and allowed density. Higher density residential areas are encouraged to be, but are not required or restricted to, proximity to commercial mixed use areas to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities without requiring the use of a car. Proposed – Community Commercial Mixed Use. The Community Commercial Mixed Use category promotes commercial areas necessary for economic health and vibrancy. This includes professional and personal services, retail, education, health services, offices, public administration, and tourism establishments. Density is expected to be higher than it is currently in most commercial areas in Bozeman and should include multi-story buildings. Residences on upper floors, in appropriate circumstances, are encouraged. The urban character expected in this designation includes urban streetscapes, plazas, outdoor seating, public art, and hardscaped open space and park amenities. High density residential areas are expected in close proximity. 27 Page 19 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). Developments in this land use area should be located on one or two quadrants of intersections of the arterial and/or collector streets and integrated with transit and non-automotive routes. Due to past development patterns, there are also areas along major streets where this category is organized as a corridor rather than a center. Although a broad range of uses may be appropriate in both types of locations, the size and scale is to be smaller within the local service areas. Building and site designs made to support easy reuse of the building and site over time is important. Mixed use areas should be developed in an integrated, pedestrian friendly manner and should not be overly dominated by any single use. Higher intensity uses are encouraged in the core of the area or adjacent to significant streets and intersections. Building height or other methods of transition may be required for compatibility with adjacent development. Smaller neighborhood scale areas are intended to provide local service to an area of approximately one half-mile radius as well as passerby. These smaller centers support and help give identity to neighborhoods by providing a visible and distinct focal point as well as employment and services. Densities of nearby homes needed to support this scale are an average of 14 to 22 dwellings per net acre. 28 Page 20 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). Zoning Correlation With Land Use Categories 29 Page 21 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). APPENDIX B - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Project Description Gustav Dose (landowner), 414 N. Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT, 59715, and Allied Engineering Services, Inc. (applicant), 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT, submitted a growth policy amendment requesting to amend the Bozeman Community Plan (Growth Policy) future land use designation from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use on approximately 0.244 acres developed with a single household structure. The site is addressed as 414 N Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715. The GPA application elaborates on the project as follows: “The subject property is located at 414 North Plum Avenue. The site is located south and directly adjacent to the existing Mountains Walking Brewery site. The project site is anticipated to be used for expansion of brewery operations and for use as employee housing. The lot of interest is currently zoned as R-2 (submitting ZMA proposing change to B-2M) and has an existing single-family residence on the property. The community plan future land use for the lot is currently designated as Urban Neighborhood. As part of this submittal we are proposing a map change to amend the future land use to Community Commercial Mixed Use. The proposed future land use will match the adjacent areas to the north and east along with the associated and adjacent brewery site. The future improvements anticipate construction of a new building on the lot to expand the brewery space and create employee housing on the second floor of the new building. Additional parking is anticipated to be provided on the subject property for overflow brewery parking. Applications are being made for the Zone Map Amendment and Growth Policy Amendment to be reviewed concurrently.” While the applicant has indicated the future anticipated development of the site including associated improvements, that is not being reviewed today. Any subsequent development submittals will be provided with future applications that will be submitted to the City of Bozeman for review if the growth policy amendment is approved. Approval of the requested growth policy amendment is not dependent on and does not guarantee completion of the project as described above. 30 Page 22 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was sent via US first class mail to the owners of the subject property and all owners of property located within 200 feet of the perimeter of the site. The project site was posted with a copy of the notice in one location: along N Plum Ave. The notice was published in the Legal Ads section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on October 10, 24 and November 14, 2021. The Planning Board public hearing was scheduled for November 01, 2021. Written public comments have been received regarding this project. Written comments are available at the below link. The comments given orally to the Planning Board are available through the web link in the Executive Summary. Many commenters have merged comments on this growth policy amendment with the zone map amendment application Mountains Walking 21319 which follows this growth policy amendment, thus the public comments have been combined into one folder to ensure all commenters are entered into the record. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=256275&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN Major themes of the public comment have been: 1. Concern regarding the character of the neighborhood and adjacency of further commercial development adjacent to existing residential properties that does not blend with the existing residential. In particular this incompatibility concern is regarding future development of the subject parcel and the added commercial activities that would come with that. 2. Concern regarding increase in commercial activity including, but not limited to, noise, patron and industrial traffic, material nuisances, deliveries, etc. 3. Concern of reduced market value of adjacent residential properties. 4. Support of change as it adds potential employment opportunities at a living wage. 5. Support of change as it add potential for employee housing. 6. Support of change as it adds walkable destinations for residents (also noted it supports community events and artists). 31 Page 23 of 23 21318, Staff Report for the Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Gustav Dose, 414 N Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant: Allied Engineering Services, Inc. 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Representative: Allied Engineering Services, Inc. 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Report By: Lynn Hyde, Development Review Planner FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this growth policy amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715 and electronically via link below. Application materials https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=239935&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN 32 Version April 2020 RESOLUTION 5343 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, STATING THE INTENT OF THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE BOZEMAN COMMUNITY PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has had a comprehensive plan (growth policy) since 1958, and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman adopted its most current growth policy known as the Bozeman Community Plan (BCP) through Resolution 5133 on November 17, 2020, and WHEREAS, the Bozeman Community Plan, Section 5, establishes criteria for the amending of the document, and WHEREAS, an application has been received to amend the Future Land Use Map of the growth policy, and WHEREAS, in accordance with 76-1-602, MCA, the City Commission must adopt a resolution of intent and conduct a public hearing prior to taking any action to adopt or revise a growth policy, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, to wit: Section 1 In accordance with the requirements of Section 76-1-604 MCA, the intent to consider the application for amendment and possible corresponding revisions to the growth policy is hereby stated. Section 2 That a public hearing be set and advertised for the purpose of receiving public testimony on application 21318, Mountains Walking growth policy amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan. Expected dates are with the Planning Board hearing on 33 Version April 2020 November 01, 2021 and the City Commission hearing on November 23, 2021. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the ____ day of ________, 20____. ___________________________________ CYNTHIA L. ANDRUS Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 34 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Project Type(s): Street Address: >ĞŐĂůĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ͗ ĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶŽĨWƌŽũĞĐƚ͗ ƵƌƌĞŶƚŽŶŝŶŐ͗ Gross Lot Area: ůŽĐŬ&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ;ƐͿ͗ EƵŵďĞƌŽĨƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͗ dǇƉĞĂŶĚEƵŵďĞƌŽĨǁĞůůŝŶŐƐ͗ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ^ŝǌĞ;ƐͿ͗ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;ƐͿ͗ EƵŵďĞƌŽĨWĂƌŬŝŶŐ^ƉĂĐĞƐ͗ īŽƌĚĂďůĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ;zͬEͿ͗ ĂƐŚͲŝŶͲůŝĞƵWĂƌŬůĂŶĚ;zͬEͿ͗ ĞƉĂƌƚƵƌĞͬĞǀŝĂƟŽŶZĞƋƵĞƐƚ;zͬEͿ͗ A1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT IMAGE Community Development ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚZĞǀŝĞǁƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ Page 1ŽĨ3 ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶĂƚĞ͗:ƵŶĞϮϬϮϬ SPECIAL DISTRICTS KǀĞƌůĂǇŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͗EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ EŽŶĞ hƌďĂŶZĞŶĞǁĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͗ ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ EŽƌƚŚϳƚŚǀĞŶƵĞ EŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚ EŽƌƚŚWĂƌŬ EŽŶĞ VICINITY MAP Mountains Walking Growth Policy Amendment Growth Policy Amendment 414 N Plum Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715 Northern Pacific ADD, S07, T02 S, R06E, Block 50, Lot 18-20, Plat C-23 Mountains Walking Brewery to be changed from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use. R-2 (submitting ZMA concurrently to propose zoning change to B-2M) 0.244 acres N/A 1 existing Existing Single-family Residence (1) 1196 square feet total, 768 square feet of living area (from Cadastral) 1 story N/A N/A N/A N/A Proposed growth policy (map) amendment for the lot just south of the current 35 36 APPLICATION FEE Varies by project type CONTACT US ůĨƌĞĚD͘^ƟīWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ϮϬĂƐƚKůŝǀĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŽǌĞŵĂŶ͕Ddϱϵϳϭϱ ƉŚŽŶĞϰϬϲͲϱϴϮͲϮϮϲϬ ĨĂǆϰϬϲͲϱϴϮͲϮϮϲϯ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐΛďŽǌĞŵĂŶ͘ŶĞƚ ǁǁǁ͘ďŽǌĞŵĂŶ͘ŶĞƚͬƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚZĞǀŝĞǁƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ Page 3ŽĨ3 ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶĂƚĞ͗:ƵŶĞϮϬϮϬ REQUIRED FORMS Varies by project type s>KWDEdZs/tWW>/d/KE ŚĞĐŬĂůůƚŚĂƚĂƉƉůǇ &KZD 1. ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƟǀĞ/ŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚĂƟŽŶƉƉĞĂů / 2. ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƟǀĞWƌŽũĞĐƚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶƉƉĞĂů W 3. ŶŶĞǆĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ/ŶŝƟĂůŽŶŝŶŐ EEy 4. ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůͬEŽŶƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůK K 5. ŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ^ŝŐŶWůĂŶ ^W 6. ŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵZĞǀŝĞǁ Z 7. ŽŶĚŝƟŽŶĂůhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚ hW 8. ǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶƚŽƉƉƌŽǀĞĚWůĂŶ yd 9. 'ƌŽǁƚŚWŽůŝĐǇŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ 'W 10. /ŶĨŽƌŵĂůZĞǀŝĞǁ /E& 11. DĂƐƚĞƌ^ŝƚĞWůĂŶ D^W 12. DŽĚŝĮĐĂƟŽŶͬWůĂŶŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ DK 13. EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚͬZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůK EK 14. WƌĞͲĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶŽŶƐƵůƚĂƟŽŶ EŽŶĞ 15. WhŽŶĐĞƉƚWůĂŶ Wh FORM 16. WhWƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌǇWůĂŶ WhW 17. Wh&ŝŶĂůWůĂŶ Wh&W 18. ZĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƟŽŶ Z 19. ^ŝƚĞWůĂŶ ^W 20. ^ƉĞĐŝĂůhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚ ^hW 21. ^ƉĞĐŝĂůdĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚ ^dhW 22. ^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶǆĞŵƉƟŽŶ ^ 23. ^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶWƌĞͲƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ W 24. ^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶWƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌǇWůĂŶ WW 25. ^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ&ŝŶĂůWůĂƚ &W 26. tĞƚůĂŶĚZĞǀŝĞǁ tZ 27. ŽŶĞDĂƉŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ D 28. ŽŶĞdĞǆƚŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ d 29. ŽŶŝŶŐͬ^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶsĂƌŝĂŶĐĞ ͬ^sZ 30. ŽŶŝŶŐĞǀŝĂƟŽŶͬĞƉĂƌƚƵƌĞ EŽŶĞ 31. KƚŚĞƌ͗ APPLICATION TYPE 37 Civil Ɣ Geotechnical Ɣ Water Resources Ɣ Land Surveying Ɣ Construction Services Corporate Office 32 Discovery Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718 Ph: (406) 582-0221 www.alliedengineering.com DUNS: 00-769-3724 CAGE: IGHU7 August 3, 2021 Bill Pratt Community Development Technician I 20 East Olive Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 406-582-2260 RE: Growth Policy Map Amendment Initial Application Submittal Dear COB Planning Department: Please find enclosed the application package for a proposed Growth Policy Map Amendment. The subject property is defined as Lots 18, 19, and 20, Block 50 of the Northern Pacific Addition Plat C-23. The property is located along the east side of Plum Avenue directly south of and adjacent to the existing Mountains Walking Brewery. The future land use of the lot is currently designated as Urban Neighborhood. The proposed growth policy amendment is to amend the subject property future land use designation to Community Commercial Mixed Use. This growth policy amendment is being submitted for review concurrently with a zone map amendment. The growth policy amendment is the first step to allow for expansion of operations associated with Mountains Walking Brewery. The anticipated improvements on the subject property will include a new structure with brewing operations on the main/ground level and living units on an upper level(s). The living units are anticipated to be allocated for employees of the brewery. Parking is anticipated on-site for the proposed improvements and for overflow parking for the existing brewery site. The attached application package includes the completed and signed development review application (Form A1), the completed and signed property adjoiners certificate (Form N1) including a list of adjoining property owners, a project narrative, and a PDF exhibit of the property to be modified. Sincerely, Allied Engineering Services, Inc. X Rory Romey Civil Engineer X Jessi Ellingsen Civil Engineer Digitally signed by Rory Romey Date: 2021.08.03 09:50:19 -06'00' 38 Growth Policy Map Amendment Initial Application Submittal 20-144 August 3, 2021 Bozeman Office: 32 Discovery Drive. Bozeman, Montana 59718. භ Ph: (406) 582-0221 භ Fax: (406) 582-5770 Page 2 enc: -Application Package for Growth Policy Map Amendment P:\2020\20-144 Mountain Walking - Zone Map Amendment\04 Permitting & Entitlements\Growth Policy Application\Word Doc & Fillable PDF Versions\Cover Letter.docx 39 Growth Policy Amendment Project Narrative Project Background Information The subject property is located at 414 North Plum Avenue. The site is located south and directly adjacent to the existing Mountains Walking Brewery site. The project site is anticipated to be used for expansion of brewery operations and for use as employee housing. The lot of interest is currently zoned as R-2 (submitting ZMA proposing change to B-2M) and has an existing single-family residence on the property. The community plan future land use for the lot is currently designated as Urban Neighborhood. As part of this submittal we are proposing a map change to amend the future land use to Community Commercial Mixed Use. The proposed future land use will match the adjacent areas to the north and east along with the associated and adjacent brewery site. The future improvements anticipate construction of a new building on the lot to expand the brewery space and create employee housing on the second floor of the new building. Additional parking is anticipated to be provided on the subject property for overflow brewery parking. Applications are being made for the Zone Map Amendment and Growth Policy Amendment to be reviewed concurrently. a) Does the proposed amendment cure a deficiency in the growth policy or result in an improved growth policy which better responds to the needs of the general community? How? Yes, the proposed amendment results in an improved growth policy which better responds to the needs of the general community. Changing the future land use designation for the lot to Community Commercial Mixed Use will better meet the needs of the general community by allowing for expansion of the current Mountains Walking Brewery. Expansion of the brewery will provide an easily accessible gathering place for the community to come together, enjoy craft beer, and make good conversation. The expansion will also provide employee housing on the upper floor which is an excellent way to meet the needs of employees who struggle to find affordable housing in Bozeman. In addition, the new future land use designation promotes redevelopment by converting the existing residential property into a multi-use lot. Multi-use properties help promote diverse uses of land in very close proximity to one another which ultimately reduces traffic congestion on the roads and the air pollution associated with motor travel. Redevelopment, as opposed to new development, saves time, money, and resources by connecting to existing utilities. In this case, adequate water, drainage, transportation, and sanitary facilities will be provided via existing utilities located in Plum Avenue. b) Does the proposed amendment create inconsistencies within the growth policy, either between the goals and the map or between goals? Why not? No, the proposed amendment does not create inconsistencies within the growth policy either between the goals and the map or between goals. The proposed future land use of 40 the site matches future land use of adjacent properties to the north and east. The change does not result in a pocket of inconsistent land use, rather blends well with the current plan. The City of Bozeman has announced its planning goals for how the city should expand in the future. These goals consist of seven overall themes that include being: 1. A resilient city. 2. A city of unique neighborhoods. 3. A city bolstered by downtown and complementary districts. 4. A city influenced by our natural environment, parks, and open lands. 5. A city that prioritizes accessibility and mobility choices. 6. A city powered by its creative, innovative, and entrepreneurial economy. 7. A city engaged in regional coordination. The proposed expansion of Mountains Walking Brewery and the proposed growth policy amendment do not go against any of the seven themes and/or the goals to achieve those themes. Conversely, the proposed development actually supports many of the themes. Two of the main goals for the City of Bozeman include promoting diversity in land use/housing and reducing urban sprawl. Both goals aim to use land in the most efficient way possible, which ultimately helps preserve open space and reduces the need for individual motorized travel. The proposed expansion would help the City of Bozeman meet these goals by redeveloping the lot into a mixed-use building that includes both brewery operations and employee housing. Redevelopment, as opposed to new development on the outskirts of town, saves time, money, and resources while simultaneously reducing urban sprawl. The reduction in urban sprawl in turn helps preserve the natural environment that Bozeman is known and loved for. Regarding the goal of prioritizing accessibility and mobility choices, the proposed development is easily accessed via several different transportation methods. Its proximity to residential neighborhoods makes it easily accessible by walking or biking while arterial and collector streets such as Rouse Ave, Peach St, and Broadway Ave make it easily accessible by car. The streamline bus service also has a major hub in downtown which is just a short walk away. Additionally, the on-site employee housing reduces/eliminates commuting for employees. The proposed development aims to be resilient and resourceful by connecting to existing utilities. Lastly, the expansion of Mountains Walking caters to Bozeman’s tourism industry which is a major economic driver here. c) Is the proposed amendment consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy? How? Yes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy. Proximity to adjacent areas matching the proposed future land use help to blend the site into surrounding uses. The project site is located along the future land use boundary, maintaining the overall concept of the area. The proposed development aims to better serve the community by providing a social gathering place, jobs, and employee housing. Bringing people together will help improve the mental health and happiness among community members, while providing employment and housing helps employees feel 41 safe, secure, and stable. Changing the future land use designation to Community Commercial Mixed Use allows for greater land use/housing diversity and encourages the most efficient use of space. Creating diverse land uses within close proximity to one another reduces the need for people to travel far from home for work, groceries, and recreation. Additionally, the proposed development is very close to dense residential neighborhoods which will encourage patrons to walk or bike. The decrease in travel lessens air pollution, which is known to have significant adverse effects on public health and welfare. Furthermore, the proposed amendment will allow for the redevelopment of the lot, which is encouraged by the City of Bozeman to help limit urban sprawl and preserve open space. The work/live nature of the proposed development increases Bozeman’s resilience by providing solutions to both housing and employment issues. It also promotes resilience by harmonizing with existing activity through expanding a business that is already well established and thoroughly enjoyed by the community. The expansion would be easily accessible and provide several options for mobility. As mentioned before, the proposed expansion is in very close proximity to residential neighborhoods which makes it easily accessible on foot or bike. Arterial and collector streets such as Rouse Ave, Peach St, and Broadway Ave provide easy access to the site via automobile. Additionally, a major streamline bus service hub and the Gallagator Trail are only a short walk away towards downtown. Lastly, the proposed development will help support Bozeman’s economy by attracting locals and tourists. Overall, the proposed amendment aligns very nicely with the intent of the growth policy. d) Does the proposed amendment adversely affect the community as a whole or significant portion by: i) Significantly altering acceptable existing and future land use patterns, as defined in the text and maps of the plan? How does it not? No, the proposed amendment does not significantly alter acceptable existing and future land use patterns. The proposed amendment seeks to change the future land use designation for the lot from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use. This is a relatively minor change to the future land use patterns because the area adjacent to the site (the area where the current brewery is) is already designated as Community Commercial Mixed Use. Changing the future land use designation to Community Commercial Mixed Use will keep land use designations consistent for both the existing brewery and the proposed expansion. The site is located along the current boundary of future land use. Under the proposed change, the overall boundary is shifted in a relatively minor way. The overall pattern for the area will be maintained, if anything squaring up the future land use boundary as shown with the attached exhibits. 42 ii) Requiring unmitigated larger and more expensive improvements to streets, water, sewer, or other public facilities or services and which, therefore, may impact development of other lands? How does it not? No, the proposed amendment does not require unmitigated larger and more expensive improvements to streets, water, sewer, or other public facilities and services. Adequate water will be provided by the City’s existing municipal system. Figure 6-7 in the Water Facility Plan details the existing water distribution system and shows that the area surrounding the proposed development has an acceptable level of head loss, indicating there is adequate capacity to provide water for the development. Adequate fire flow will also be provided by Hydrant #45. According to Table 5.7 in the Water Facility Plan, a zone designation of B-2 (concurrent ZMA proposing zoning change to B-2M) needs 3,000 gpm of flow for 3 hours to fulfill fire protection requirements. According to Figure 6-8 of the Water Facility Plan, the available fire flow for the proposed development area is 4,000-5,000 gpm, which confirms that suitable fire flow for fire protection is met. Adequate sewer will also be provided by the City’s existing municipal system. According to the City’s design criteria, sewer pipes that have a depth of flow to pipe diameter (d/D) ratio exceeding 0.75 are considered potentially deficient. Figure 4-8 of the Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan Update (2015) shows that the sewer pipes servicing the proposed development and surrounding area all have a depth of flow to pipe diameter (d/D) ratio less than 0.75, indicating that there is adequate wastewater capacity for proper sewage disposal. Transportation access will remain primarily unchanged. Access is anticipated to be provided via principal arterial Rouse Ave and collector streets Peach St and Broadway Ave, but can also be accessed by other local streets such as Plum Ave or on foot/bike. The proposed future land use is not anticipated to have a significant change or additional burden to public facilities. The anticipated site improvements are consistent with other uses in the area. iii) Adversely impacting existing uses because of unmitigated greater than anticipated impacts on facilities and services? How does it not? No, the proposed amendment will not adversely impact existing uses because of unmitigated greater than anticipated impacts on facilities and services. Figure 6-7 in the Water Facility Plan shows that the area surrounding the proposed development has an acceptable level of headloss, which indicates there is adequate capacity to provide water for the proposed development without negatively affecting existing uses. Table 5.7 in the Water Facility Plan shows that the proposed development (proposed B-2M zoning) requires 3,000 gpm of flow for 3 hours to suffice fire protection requirements. Figure 6-8 of the Water Facility Plan shows that the available fire flow for the proposed development area is 4,000-5,000 gpm, confirming that there is adequate fire flow available with 1,000 gpm to spare. The City’s design criteria specify that sewer pipes that have a depth of flow to pipe diameter ratio (d/D) exceeding 0.75 are considered potentially deficient. Figure 4-8 of the Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan 43 Update (2015) shows that the sewer pipes servicing the proposed development and surrounding area all have a depth of flow to pipe diameter (d/D) ratio less than 0.75, indicating that there is adequate wastewater capacity for proper sewage disposal. Some of the sewer pipes servicing the proposed development have an even lower depth of flow to pipe diameter ratio of 0.5 which indicates there is some extra capacity available. To summarize, the facilities and services for existing uses will not be adversely impacted by the brewery expansion. iv) Negatively affecting the livability of the area of the health and safety of residents? How does it not? No, the proposed amendment does not negatively affect the livability of the area or the health and safety of residents. The proposed development aims to improve the livability of the area by providing a social gathering place, on-site employee housing, and creating jobs. There will still be adequate water, sewer, and street capacity for the area. Sewage and garbage will be properly disposed of to ensure there are no health hazards resulting from the proposed development. Additional parking will be provided for the brewery so that street parking is not overwhelmed. Emergency access will be maintained via Rouse Ave, Peach St, Broadway Ave, and other local streets. Lastly, the proposed development will not overload fire flow capacity. In conclusion, the proposed expansion of Mountains Walking will not negatively affect the livability of the area or the health and safety of residents. The proposed/anticipated improvements for the site will promote and provide employee housing for the associated Mountains Walking Brewery. The proposed use allows for safe and cost-effective housing, an overall benefit for employees. 44 Supporting Figures for Project Narrative 45 4,3370.1 Miles This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Feet 5050 Legend 253 Location 505 05/24/2021 Created By: Created For: Date: Title Street Names Community Plan Future Land Use Urban Neighborhood Traditional Core Residential Mixed Use Regional Commercial and Services Community Commercial Mixed Use Maker Space Mixed Use Industrial Public Institutions Parks and Open Lands No City Services City Limits 46 47 GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFG!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!! G!!G!! G!! G!!³Ú UT UT UT³Ú #I #I #I #I#I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I #I FOWLER LNRED W I N G D R CED A R S T BLACKWOOD RD BOH A R T L NWATTS LNARNICA DRJOHNSON RD RAINBOW RD ABAGAIL RANCH RD PARK VIEW PL RED TAIL RANCH RDDRIFTWOOD DR HORSETAIL RDVALLEY DRELLIS ST21ST AVEWILDFLOWER WAYFLANDERS MILL RDTHOMAS DR18TH AVE20TH AVE16TH AVE15TH AVEHALEY RD HEATHER LN23RD AVESACCO DRKAGY BLVD HOLLY DRWILDA LNWINTE R G R E E N L N ASH DR LUCI L L E L N HYALITE VIEW DR BENNETT DRDAVIS LNE V E R G R E E N D R WHEAT DR HA G G E R T Y L NSTORY MILL RDFALLON ST MCGEE DRHOFER LNRIDGE TRLWILLOW WAYLILY DR BURKE ST 10TH AVEBIRDIE DRBLUEBIRD LN 28TH AVE30TH AVE26TH AVEMAYA WAYHARPER PUCKETT RDPARK PL VALLEY RIDGE RDGOLDENSTEIN LN INTE R S T A T E 9 0 H W Y ROSE ST BUTTONWOOD AVELEA AVEAU G U S T A D R ARROWLEAF HILLS DRMIDFIELD ST SHADOW CIRRI A T A R D NASH RANCH RD TERRENCE LOOP RD PALETTE CTK N A A B D REASTWOOD DRJACK LEG LNYERGER DRPAINTED H IL LS RD OLD FARM RD HUNTERS WAYGREEK WAYHAYRAKE LN JE A N A L E I C T LEXINGTON DR COVER ST SUNDANCE DRBOYD RDPROFESSIONAL DRFEN WAYVALLE Y C E N T E R R D INDUSTRIAL DRCHERRY DRSPRUCE DRBOGART DRANNIE ST DELL PLARABIAN AVETETON AVETRIUMPH ST LANCE DRCOTTONWOOD RDCLASSICAL WAY COOK CT BENEPE ST KAGY RD URSA STSOLAR WAYPA R C T ST ANDREWS DR PATTERSON RD SIMMENTAL WAYTAYABESHOCKUP RDALEXANDER ST PERRY ST BRYANT ST PARKWAY AVEL STGRAF ST DAISY DR LINDVIG DRRAWHIDE RDG GEBHARDT TRL M Y E R S L NCANDY LNFRANKLIN HILLS DRFOWLER AVEFARRIER LNANNETTE PARK DRDAWS DR PONDERA AVETRIPLE TREE RDTAI LNVIRGINIA DRERIK DRGALE CTROSA WAYHITCHING POST RD11TH AVEHUFFINE LN CARSON PL24TH AVEGO L F W A Y CATALYST ST RYAN DR CATKIN LN SANDERS AVEPEACE PIPE DRFERGUSON AVEFARM VIEW LN POST DR MONIDA ST 9TH AVEVIRGINIA WAYSTUBBS LNALDER COURT LNCATTAIL ST LLOYD STJAMES AVEJESSIE WAYMAX AVE13TH AVE19TH AVE BRAJENKA LNWHISPER LNS O U T H V I EW R I D G E LN ACCOLA DR TROOP E R T R L TSCHACHE LNWINTER PARK ST MASON ST QUINN DAVID L N ALPINE WAY POTOSI ST DISCOVERY DRHILLCREST DRHIDDEN VALLEY RDCHOUTEAU AVEBLACKBIRD DR25TH AVEDENNISON LN G O L D A V E BUR AVESPRING MEADOWS DRDULOHERY LN CATRON ST STOCKMAN WAYGIBSON DR 6TH AVESHO E F E L T T R LSUMMER VIEW LNDAVIS ST CAYUSE SPUR TRL ENTERPRISE BLVDBABCOCK ST COMMERCE WAYHUFFMAN LN CUTTING ST BRIDGER CANYO N R D MAUS LNS T AR R IDG E R D LIM E S TO N E R DSTAFFANSON RDCOBBLE CREEK RDWILDROSE LN BO O T H I L L C T CANARY LNHIGHLAND BLVDFIELD ST BOYLAN RD BEALL ST LOLO WAY MCI L H A T T A N R D RESORT DRICE POND RDTRACY AVEMAIN ST GARDNER PARK DRFRO N T S T WILLSON AVEWALLACE AVESUNLIGHT AVEOLIVER ST HILL ST27TH AVEVILLARD ST SADDLE CREEK RD4TH AVEGRIFFIN DR 17TH AVESHADOW DROLIVE ST STUCKY RD 5TH AVETWIN LAKES AVEROCKY CREE K R D BIG GULCH DRKOCH ST 29TH AVECOLLEGE ST 12 T H A V E 7TH AVEREE V E S R D STORY ST BOND ST GRANT ST ARNOLD ST DURSTON RD HILLSIDE LN FRON T A G E R D TAMARACK ST SOURDOUGH RDMENDENHALL STROUSE AVECHURCH AVESHERIDAN AVE3RD AVEMANLEY RDDICKERSON STCASPIAN AVEBRIDGER DRNASH RDBIGELOW RDREDWOOD DRGARFIELD STBOZEMAN AVE22ND AVE OAK ST BAXTER LN FAIRWAY DRDAVIS LN11TH AVETRIPLE TREE RD JOHNSON RD SHADOW DR15TH AVECATRON ST KAGY BLVD19TH AVEFERGUSON AVE7TH AVECOTTONWOOD RDGRAF ST INTERSTATE 9 0 H W Y BAXTER LN IN T E R S T A T E 9 0 H W Y FRO N T S T 6TH AVEDAVIS LNFRON T A G E R D 3RD AVE7TH AVE7TH AVETRIPLE TREE RD29TH AVEBOYLAN RDMANLEY RD19TH AVEOAK ST NASH RD HITCHING POST RDCOTTONWOOD RDSTUCKY RD GOLDENSTEIN LN OAK ST 7TH AVE9TH AVEHUFFINE LN A B A G A I L R A N C H R D KAGY BLVD15TH AVE5TH AVEL STJOHNSON RD 19TH AVE3RD AVE3RD AVECOTTONWOOD RD4TH AVEL ST 3RD AVEOAK STOAK ST 19TH AVE4TH AVEMCGEE DR3RD AVEMAIN ST GRAF ST FOWLER LNGRAF ST19TH AVE5TH AVESO U R D O U G H R D BRIDGER DR KAGY BLVD 19TH AVEGRAF ST PATTERSON RD COTTONWOOD RDSOURDOUGH RD19TH AVE27TH AVE19TH AVEMANLEY RDHAGGERTY LN 5TH AVEBIG GULCH DR27TH AVEMAIN ST VALLEY DR6TH AVEBIG GULC H D R FLANDERS MILL RDSTORY MILL RDINTERSTATE 90 HWYJACK LEG LNLIMESTONE RDCOTTONWOOD RDFOWLER LNL STINTERSTATE 9 0 H W Y 3RD AVE3RD AVE22ND AVEOAK ST NASH RD23RD AVE6TH AVEMAIN STBIG GULCH DRDAVIS LN19TH AVEBAXTER LN ROUSE AVEPATTERSON RD OAK ST TAYABESHOCKUP RDBAXTER LN BOYLAN RDSIMMENTAL WAY3RD AVEDAVIS LNTRIPLE TREE RD NASH RD TRACY AVEMC G E E D R11TH AVECOTTONWOOD RDGRAF S T CHURCH AVESOURDOUGH RDTR O O P E R T R L STORY ST GRAF ST NASH RDFOWLER LNPATTERSON RD ELLIS ST FOWLER LNPAINTED HILLS RD19TH AVE19TH AVEMAIN ST FALLON ST 7TH AVEMAIN ST NASH RDL ST20TH AVEFOWLER LNANNIE ST SOURDOUGH RDTROO P E R T R L 3RD AVE5 7 8 2 1 34 6 922 21 20 18 16 1210 11 14 56 67 57 70 40 59 31 62 71 68 58 47 6941 65 2642 73 51 341917 1513 60 39 75 32 52 25 43 37 36 3854 74 55 66 53 45 48 2364 35 46 44 72 28 63 2724 50 61 30 29 49 33 Water Distribution System G!!Test Hydrant GFFlow Hydrant Fire Flow Test LocationsWithin the South Pressure Zone ¯0 2,0005001,0001,500 Feet³Ú Pear St Pump Station ³Ú Knoll Pump Station UT Clearwell UT Hilltop Tank UT Lyman Tank UT Sourdough Tank #I Existing PRVPressure Zones GALLATIN KNOLL NORTHEAST NORTHWEST SOUTH WEST Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. 48 Water Facility Plan Update Chapter 5 – Design Parameters and Evaluation Criteria July 2017 P05097-2013-001 Page 80 5.5.3 City of Bozeman Fire Flow Availability The evaluation completed for the Water Facility Plan Update determined available fire flows (to assess the distribution system under current and future water demand conditions) by using zoning districts that represent different types of development. Therefore, the fire flow requirements set forth in this Water Facility Plan Update are intended only for general planning purposes, and may not be reflective of actual fire flow requirements required by the size and construction type of a specific development, and will not identify specific non-conforming developments. These guidelines are intended to comply with requirements in the City’s Design Standards and Specifications calling for fire flow demands to be calculated as determined by ISO criteria. Available fire flow is the flow rate of water supply available at the hydrants for firefighting measured at a residual pressure of 20 psi. The residual pressure of 20 psi represents the minimum pressure required to provide normal water pressure to a second story faucet while a nearby fire event is in progress. Table 5.7 presents the recommended fire flow guidelines along with the required fire flow volumes used in the analysis. Figure 5-2 shows fire flow guidelines for existing and future land use. Zoning District Category Flow (gpm) Duration (hrs) No. of Fires Total Demand (gal) Residential Use R-4 Residential High Density 3,000 3 1 540,000 R-3 Residential Medium Density 3,000 3 1 540,000 R-2 Residential, Single-family Medium Density 1,500 2 1 180,000 R-1 Residential, Single-family Low Density 1,500 2 1 120,000 PU Public Lands and Institutions 3,000 3 1 540,000 Commercial Use B-1 Neighborhood Business 3,000 3 1 540,000 B-2 Community Business 3,000 3 1 540,000 B-3 Central Business 4,000 4 1 960,000 Industrial Use M-1 Light Manufacturing 4,000 4 1 960,000 M-2 Manufacturing and Industrial 5,000 4 1 1,200,000 Table 5.7: Fire Flow Availability Guidelines 49 50 Figure 4-8 – Existing System Results – Maximum d/D 4-21 51 4,3370.1 Miles This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Feet 5050 Legend 253 Location 505 05/24/2021 Created By: Created For: Date: Title Street Names Community Plan Future Land Use Urban Neighborhood Traditional Core Residential Mixed Use Regional Commercial and Services Community Commercial Mixed Use Maker Space Mixed Use Industrial Public Institutions Parks and Open Lands No City Services City Limits 52 PLUM AVENUE ALLE Y LOTS 18, 19 & 20EXISTING LAND USEDESIGNATION:URBAN NEIGHBORHOODPOINT OFBEGINNINGPROPOSED LAND USEDESIGNATION:COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXEDUSELEGENDSHEET1 OF 1GROWTH POLICY AMENDMENTBEING LOTS 18, 19, AND 20, BLOCK 50 OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC ADDITION PLAT C-23,LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 7,TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN MONTANA,CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANACivil EngineeringGeotechnical EngineeringLand Surveying32 DISCOVERY DRIVEBOZEMAN, MT 59718PHONE (406) 582-0221FAX (406) 582-5770www.alliedeng ineer ing.comBASIS OF BEARING, COORDINATESLEGAL DESCRIPTION53 Memorandum REPORT TO:Planning Board FROM:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager SUBJECT:One Valley Community Foundation Seat at the Table civil discourse initiative sponsorship request. MEETING DATE:November 1, 2021 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:As determined by the Board. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.2 Community Engagement: Broaden and deepen engagement of the community in city government, innovating methods for inviting input from the community and stakeholders. BACKGROUND:One Valley presented the Gallatin County Housing Report on Monday, October 4, 2021. Subsequently One Valley submitted a request for sponsorship of a second “A Seat at the Table” civil discourse initiative about housing as described in the attached letter from Ms. Andreasen. One Valley and its partners continue to fundraise for this initiative, and are making requests of the Gallatin County Planning Board, local municipalities, and have attached a request to the City of Bozeman Planning Board. Investment in this initiative will go towards the production of and presentation of outcome data that can inform land use and other decision making. Please clink on the following link for the SATT Fact Sheet prepared for the effort. SATT Fact Sheet UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:1. Take no action. 2. Move to consider the request at a future meeting to make a formal recommendation to the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:If recommended by the Planning Board and approved by the City 54 Commission City funds may be allocated to support the initiative. Attachments: 10.5.21 City of Bozeman Planning Board Sponsorship Request.pdf Report compiled on: October 21, 2021 55 October 5, 2021 To the City of Bozeman Planning Board, Please consider an investment of $5,000 in the A Seat at the Table 2021 – transformational conversations about housing throughout Gallatin County. A Seat at the Table is a proven civic engagement event that inspires neighbors to come together and engage in local decision-making in their community. At our inaugural event in 2018, 74% of participants said that housing is the most pressing need in our county. We have intentionally designed A Seat at the Table 2021 to focus conversations that generate solutions to housing affordability and attainability for those who live, work, and do business in Gallatin County. Local leaders and funders are challenged by allocating scarce resources and crafting policies to address the housing needs of our community members. The results of A Seat at the Table will give local governments and other leaders diverse, broad, and rich public input about housing needs and ideas for local solutions. This initiative will produce data about the participant, their input about the inevitable tradeoffs that come with policy decisions, and stories that shed light on how the issues they experience could be resolved. A Seat at the Table directly responds to the principles and suggested actions described in the recently adopted City of Bozeman Community Plan. Should the City of Bozeman continue to advance that plan, community input is the essential starting point for that work and resulting action. An investment of $5,000 in the A Seat at the Table initiative supports your own investment of time, financial resources, and human capital in land use decision making as it relates to housing. Thank you for considering financial support of this inclusive civil discourse initiative. Sincerely, Bridget Wilkinson Executive Director Bridget@onevalley.org // 406-587-6262 ex. 5 www.AtTheTableGV.org 56