HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-07-21 Public Comment - S. Ani - Canyon GateFrom:Ross Knapper
To:Salim Ani
Cc:Agenda
Subject:RE: Canyon Gate Development Project No: 21337
Date:Thursday, October 7, 2021 8:39:41 AM
Dear Salim,
Thank you for contacting the City of Bozeman and for submitting public comment for this project.
Your comments have been added to the project record.
Best,
Ross Knapper | Development Review Coordinator, Community DevelopmentCity of Bozeman | 20 East Olive St. | P.O. Box 1230 | Bozeman, MT 59771406.582.2968 | (C) 406.451.6803 | rknapper@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
The Department of Community Development is revising its operations until further notice to address COVID-19. We
appreciate your patience and are working hard to maintain the stability of our operations. There may be delays in
responding to inquiries. We continue to receive and review development applications. Some application types may
see delays in their review times due to the suspension of public meetings.
From: Salim Ani <salimani93@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 3:03 AM
To: Ross Knapper <rknapper@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Agenda <agenda@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Canyon Gate Development Project No: 21337
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mr. Knapper,I am writing to you as a concerned Bozeman resident to express my opposition to theproposed zoning of the Canyon Gate development (Project No 21337). While it is understoodthat the land located on the corner of Story Mill Road and Bridger Drive would eventually bedeveloped, the current proposal is not in the best interests of any of the nearby residents andsurrounding communities nor does it align with the current character of the area.
I urge the City to maintain the original intent and natural beauty of the established community,zoning to align with the current development patterns for the area which would be R-1, R-2,and R-3. Small scale mixed use should be limited to B-2 (not B-2M) along Story Mill so it iscompatible with existing adjacent developments. This would maintain the character of thesurrounding areas and the intent in which people have created their homes and chosen to livein the area specifically for. The reasons for my opposition are numerous and include, but arenot limited to, the wildland-urban interface, habitat corridor, and traffic & safety concerns ofthe residents.
Wildland-urban interface & habitat corridorUsing the recent wildfire in the Bridger Mountains just up the canyon from the proposeddevelopment, the wildland-urban interface should be considered. Today, the communities ofLegends I & II, Creekwood, Headlands, and others have abundant wildlife that use the quietand safe communities as a corridor to nearby wildlands and open spaces. High densitydevelopment will put the wildland-urban interface at risk, further pushing habitat out of theirhomes and the surrounding areas.
Traffic & safetyThe proposed roadways and traffic flows are in direct conflict with the safety of so manyyoung children and active residents in the neighborhood. The proposed plan appears to ignorethe original roadway plan of the subdivision, re-routing roads directly to Story Mill, whichwill result in tremendous traffic and safety impacts, especially if you consider the ever-increasing traffic to and from Bridger Bowl. There has been a distinct increase in motor trafficand train delays in just the last few years. This proposal begs the question of properinfrastructure for the health and safety of its residents and community members.
In conclusion, I hope that you will consider my concerns and know that mine arerepresentative of an overwhelming majority of the immediate subdivision as well as thesurrounding communities. I ask that we limit the zoning to R-1, R-2, R-3, and maintain thelandscapes and zoning that have been established. Salim Ani Full time Creekwood resident