Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMPDES SWPPP Admin 8.18_F2/23/2019 1 BMP BREAKDOWN – TREATMENT BMPS HAVING DONE ALL –YET STILL HAVE DIRTY WATER! WATER TREATMENT •WHY WOULD A PROJECT NEED WATER TREATMENT? •DEFINING ATS & PTS •WHEN IS IT APPLICABLE? WHY TREATMENT IS OFTEN NEEDED WHY ACTIVE TREATMENT IS OFTEN NECESSARY: DESCRIPTION SETTLING TIME GRAVEL 1 SEC. 9.8 SEC. COARSE SAND 48 SEC. FINE SAND 67 SEC. 125 SEC. 47.6 MIN. SILT 107 MIN. 7.2 HRS. 20.1 HRS. CLAY 180 HRS. 754 DAYS COLLOIDAL PARTICLES 207 YEARS Sometimes soil particles will settle out quickly enough to achieve satisfactory discharge quality. Frequently, however, they won’t. WHY FINE CLAYS AND COLLOIDAL PARTICLES DON’T SETTLE NATURALLY: These small particles remain suspended in stormwater because of their repellent charges and small mass. e- e- e-e- e- e- e-e- e- e- e-e- THE PROCESSES OF COAGULATION AND FLOCCULATION:Once suspended particles are flocculated into larger particles, they can usually be removed from the liquid by settling, filtering, or centrifuging. Add Coagulant Flocculation Neutralizes electrostatic charge P+ P+ e-e- e-e-P+ P+P+ P+ e-e- e-e-P+ P+ P+ P+ e-e- e-e-P+ P+ P+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 2/23/2019 2 FLOCCULATION WATER TREATMENT •THE PROCESSES •COAGULATION •FLOCCULATION •CLARIFICATION •APPLICATION •DOSAGE •PH •TYPES OF WATER TREATMENT •BATCH TREATMENT CHITOSAN ENHANCED SAND FILTRATION (CESF) •ELECTRO- COAGULATION Passive Treatment -PTS Batch Treatment :Floc’dpollutant settling via gravity Active Treatment -ATS Flow-through Treatment:Floc’dpollutant filtered ADVANCED STORMWATER TREATMENT METHODS –ATS AND PTS Water is treated as a “batch” to appropriate levels and then discharged all at once •Effective •Takes large footprint •Takes time BATCH TREATMENT LARGE BATCH SYSTEM Flow-Through Treatment 1.Water is pumped from a collection point2.The pollutant is floc’dby chemical or current3.The water passes through filtration media 4.Water is discharged or re-circulated DISCHARGE Filtration Unit Recirculation Line Stormwater Main Pond 7 8 9 10 11 12 2/23/2019 3 ATS Technologies– •Electrocoagulation •Cartridge Filtration •Chitosan Enhanced Sand Filtration (CESF) FLOW THROUGH ATS TECHNOLOGIES •SUBTRACTIVE, NON-POLYMER STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM •USES ELECTRIC CHARGE TO INDUCE COAGULATION •HIGHLY EFFECTIVE FOR BASIC AND ENHANCED STORM WATER TREATMENT •FLOWRATES FROM 100-500+ GPM ELECTROCOAGULATION ELECTROCOAGULATION TWO APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICAL TREATMENT PASSIVE DOSING LIQUID INJECTION CARTRIDGE FILTRATION Can be done with or without chemistry but struggles without. •Media can be very target specific•Good in low flow situations •Small footprint •Filter blinding•Media and flocculant matching•Media replacement 13 14 15 16 17 18 2/23/2019 4 Chitosan Enhanced Sand Filtration (CESF) •CESF technology is able to treat water at high flow rates while reducing the turbidity levels by 99% or greater. •CESF technology has been applied to large infrastructure projects, box store construction, road construction and remediation sites. •Versatile and Adaptable to Different Soil Types •Extremely Low Turbidities at High Flow Rates•Controlled Dosing •Sand Filters Can Crash •Footprint•Treatability Conflicts CESF KEYS TO USE •DOSING –PASSIVE DOSING NOT ALLOWED UNLESS TO SANITARY, LIQUID RESTRICTED AT PRESCRIBED RATE •ONSITE CERTIFIED TECHNICIANS •REPORTING •QAPP (QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN) •OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS –DISCHARGE LIMITS, RESIDUAL CHEMISTRY, ETC. 1. SITE CONSIDERATIONS •SOIL TYPE •POTENTIAL POLLUTANT(S) •ALLOWABLE FOOTPRINT FOR EQUIPMENT AND WATER STORAGE •PROJECT START DATE 2. PRECIPITATION & SYSTEM SIZING •DRAINAGE (HISTORICAL RAIN VOLUME, FLOW RATE, ETC.) •TOTAL VS. INTENSITY •MINIMUM STORAGE VOLUME •2 YEAR –6 HOUR EVENT <+PRETREATMENT> 3. DISCHARGE RECEIVING WATER 303(D) & SENSITIVE HABITAT STORM SEWER VS. SURFACE DISCHARGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 2/23/2019 5 4. CHEMISTRY •TREATABILITY •“APPROVED” CHEMISTRY •USE DESIGNATION -DOSING •RESIDUAL CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER FILTRATION PH = NONVISIBLE POLLUTANT MEASURING PH PH & AQUATIC LIFE HIGH PH NEUTRALIZATION USING CO2 25 26 27 28 29 30 2/23/2019 6 NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS COST INFLUENCES ON TREATMENT •SITE CONDITIONS •PROJECT SIZE•SOIL TYPE •FACTORS INFLUENCING COSTS •PHASING OF PROJECT •RECEIVING WATERS FOR DISCHARGE •OTHER POLLUTANTS (I.E. PH, ARSENIC, PETROLEUM PRODUCTS)•TREATABILITY OF STORMWATER OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN-FIELD SERVICE: CONTRACTORS SELF PERFORM VS. SERVICE COMPANIES POTENTIAL CHEMISTRY CONFLICTS –EX. WHEEL WASH FILTRATION MEDIA CONFLICTS –EX. PAM AND SAND SELECTING BMPS BMPS SAVE MONEY •FULLY IMPLEMENTING BMPS AT ALL LEVELS (DESIGN, OPERATIONS, PHYSICAL) IS THE EASIEST WAY TO MINIMIZE COSTS. •ALL PARTIES (FROM DESIGN THROUGH CONSTRUCTION) MUST UNDERSTAND THE VARIABLES, AND WHAT ACTIONS THEY CAN TAKE TO MINIMIZE COSTS; HOWEVER, •ALL PARTIES MUST ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT ACTUAL COSTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY SOME VARIABLES OUTSIDE OF THEIR CONTROL: •ACTUAL RAINFALL •OFF-SITE ACTIVITIES BY OTHERS •UNANTICIPATED SOIL CHARACTERISTICS/CONTAMINANTS •ONGOING CHANGES IN REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 31 32 33 34 35 36 2/23/2019 7 BMP SELECTIONENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS #1 -PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND WATER QUALITY •BMPS SHOULD OUTLAST LONGEST SCHEDULE AND THE WORST STORM •CONSIDER PROJECT DURATION •WASTES GENERATED MUST BE CONSIDERED •BIODEGRADABLE VS. SOLID WASTE •MEDIA DISPOSAL AND REPLACEMENT •SLUDGE –CONTAMINATION AND LAND APPLICATION BMP SELECTION ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS •SAVE TIME AND MONEY AND REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF PENALTIES •MINIMIZE INTERRUPTION IN OPERATIONS AND DECREASE COSTS OF REPAIRING DAMAGE CAUSED BY EROSION •PROPER INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE CAN HELP CONTROL COSTS OF REPLACING BMPS •LOOK AT BOTH LONG AND SHORT TERM COST BMP SELECTION OTHER CONSIDERATIONS •INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE MUST BE FACTORED IN AS WELL AS COST OF MATERIALS •SOILS, CLIMATE, TOPOGRAPHY AND DURATION OF USE MUST BE EXAMINED PRIOR TO GROUND BREAKING (BMP PLANNING). •IT MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE TO USE A CERTAIN BMP ONCE ALL VARIABLES ARE FACTORED IN. PRIORITIZING ESC FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES Adapted from KY ESC Field Manual PRODUCT PERFORMANCE IS AFFECTED BY: •SLOPE STEEPNESS AND LENGTH •SOIL TYPE •TIME OF SEEDING •DIRECTIONAL EXPOSURE •WEATHER CONDITIONS •QUALITY OF INSTALLATION BMP SELECTION REMINDERS •PLAN AHEAD! •DESIGN PROJECT AND BMPS SPECIFIC TO THE SITE CONDITIONS •MINIMIZE EROSION POTENTIAL FROM DAY 1. •TIMING•COMPLETE PROJECTS IN PHASES •DON’T EXPOSE SOIL IN RAINY SEASON IF POSSIBLE •TAKE TIME FOR PROPER INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE OF BMPS 37 38 39 40 41 42 2/23/2019 8 BREAK 43