HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-24-21 Public Comment - T. Niemann - Canyon GateFrom:Ross Knapper
To:Agenda
Subject:FW: #21-337 - Proposed Development - Bridger Drive/Story Mill
Date:Friday, September 24, 2021 8:45:22 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Knapper
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 8:45 AM
To: 'Thomas Niemann' <wolverine7986@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: #21-337 - Proposed Development - Bridger Drive/Story Mill
Dear Thomas,
Thank you for contacting the City of Bozeman and for submitting your public comment for this project. Your
comments have been added to the project record.
Best,
Ross Knapper | Development Review Coordinator, Community Development City of Bozeman | 20 East Olive St. |
P.O. Box 1230 | Bozeman, MT 59771
406.582.2968 | (C) 406.451.6803 | rknapper@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
The Department of Community Development is revising its operations until further notice to address COVID-19.
We appreciate your patience and are working hard to maintain the stability of our operations. There may be delays
in responding to inquiries. We continue to receive and review development applications. Some application types
may see delays in their review times due to the suspension of public meetings.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Niemann <wolverine7986@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 5:36 PM
To: Ross Knapper <rknapper@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: #21-337 - Proposed Development - Bridger Drive/Story Mill
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mr. Knapper,
I am writing to share my thoughts on the proposed Canyon Gate project.
Bozeman is a special place. Too many overcrowded developments in the city and surrounding area are changing
that characterization. Bozeman has a unique small town feel which is rapidly being destroyed by high density
developments and poor community planning. The proposed mixed residential and commercial high density plans
proposed for the Bridger Drive/Story Mill property is a glaring example.
On a very pragmatic level, one only has to look at the neighborhoods which would be directly impacted by this
proposed development. The natural and social environment of this community would be irreparably harmed by the
introduction of business establishments and high density residential units. Traffic congestion increases alone are
beyond the current road infrastructure; particularly if one considers the added impacts when there are three new
inches of snow at the Bowl. Without enforced eminent domain actions on private lands, it is difficult to envision
how to increase Bridger Drive into a four, if not five lanes (center turning lane), to accommodate the proposed
development. Without expansion of the road, the proposed development will overload the current road's capacity.
There is also the problem of introducing so much additional paved space to the area. The stormwater drain systemin Legends I (One) (not connected to the City’s storm water drain system) was designed based on the area forproposed high density development remaining a green space. The capacity of the current Legend I cannot handlethe increase. So the City will either need to mandate a similar system/requirement for the proposed development orprovide the funding required to expand the Legends I system. The City approved the Legends I system in the 2005-6 timeframe. It is not realistic to expect the Legends I residents to accommodate an unprecedented change to thispreviously approved system design.
Additionally, regarding the proposed annexation of 2103 Bridger Dr to the City for R-2 zoning. These are somepoints to consider with regard to an action item voted on by the city commission (9/23). I do not know the outcomeof the vote. Regardless, this property abuts Legends Alley around Richau. The routing of City utilities to thisproperty will be by tapping off the easement utilities in this private alley. The utility easement is most probably onthe north side of the alley. (Water, sewer, elect, gas and CATV). Again, this is a private alley, and to encroachacross it (possibly multiple times) to provide City services to the adjoining County properties has not been approvedby the neighborhood HOA Board nor have the alley residents been notified of this possibility.Has the Commission ascertained whether or not the annexed property owner intends to construct access to theproperty through the Legends Alley? By all accounts, the neighborhood has every right to deny access to theseabutting County properties. It is important to understand why the adjoining landowners have not been advised ofsuch a request. So the question remains, how will City utilities will be brought into this property?
I am not opposed to development. I am opposed to development which makes unnecessary and destructive changesto existing neighborhoods and communities where residents made purchase decisions based on nature and quality ofthe community. This is not good planning. This is not keeping good faith with the people it is your job to serve.
Very respectfully,
Thomas Niemann2579 Weeping Rock LaneBozeman, MT