The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8.0 - CIL Water Right Correspondence with Brian Heaston 2020.10.061 R Hudock From:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET>Sent:Tuesday, October 6, 2020 1:33 PMTo:R HudockSubject:RE: Fallon Apartments - CILWR However Kevin wants to handle it is fine with me.Will need written confirmation from him for use of credits as described.Please provide this email thread and Kevin’s written request to debit from his available credits when the site plan is filed. Thanks, Brian From:R Hudock <rhudock@chengineers.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 6, 2020 11:44 AM To:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR Hello Brian, For the Fallon Apartments Site Plan, we understand that 34 CILWR credits are needed.The owner, Kevin Spencer, would like to apply 22 of the CILWR credits he owns.Therefore, CIL payment would be needed on the remaining 12 CILWR credits. Can you please confirm whether this would be acceptable?We will need to provide documentation of this as part of this site plan application. Thanks a ton! Ryan From:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent:Friday, September 25, 2020 4:17 PM To:R Hudock <rhudock@chengineers.com> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR Gotcha.Platted lots purposed for future multi-family development pay 1 MF unit per lot at the time of platting.The remainder are paid with site plan since that is when the unit density is known.Two lots give you 2 MF units already paid for a remaining balance of 34 MF units. Kevin Spencer has a sizeable quantity of CILWR credits available for his use.If written confirmation from him is provided we’ll debit the volume of 34 MF units (34*0.124 AF = 4.22 AF) from his available credit balance. Hope that helps clear things up. Brian 2 From:R Hudock <rhudock@chengineers.com> Sent:Friday, September 25, 2020 3:35 PM To:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR Thanks Brian, Sorry I’m just getting up to speed on this project, as Luke is no longer with C&H.He took another job in Seattle a couple weeks ago.If I’m understanding this correctly, an MF unit applies to only a single unit within a MF building.There are 36 total units with this development. Was CIL Water Rights for any MF units previously paid for on this specific property (Lots 2 & 3 of Block 13, Norton Ranch Subd., Ph. 4)?It sounds like 2 had been previously paid for so therefore payment on the remaining 34 units is needed.Does that sound right? Thanks, Ryan From:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent:Friday, September 25, 2020 3:22 PMTo:R Hudock <rhudock@chengineers.com> Subject:FW: Fallon Apartments -CILWR Ryan –Luke had inquired about this a couple weeks ago.Please see below thread and touch base with him.I’m assuming Kevin will want to utilize his CILWR credits to cover this development. Brian From:L Stein <lstein@chengineers.com> Sent:Friday, September 11, 2020 10:36 AM To:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc:Ryan Clark <rclark@chengineers.com> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR This helps tremendously. Thanks Brian, have a great weekend! Luke Stein, E.I. Project Manager www.chengineers.com From:Brian Heaston [mailto:bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET] Sent:Friday, September 11, 2020 10:31 AM To:L Stein <lstein@chengineers.com> Cc:Ryan Clark <rclark@chengineers.com> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR A MF unit is a single unit within a MF building.MF buildings can be as small as a duplex, or large apartment buildings with severals 10s of units.0.124 AF/yr demand is based on analysis of MF customers in the city.MF unit demand is not the same as single family unit demand.That’s clearly shown on the calculation sheet. 3 For multi family lots in a subdivision, 1 MF unit is required to file the plat.The rest are paid at site plan when the density of the development is known.There should plat note to this effect on Ph 4 final plat. Hope that helps. From:L Stein <lstein@chengineers.com> Sent:Friday, September 11, 2020 9:51 AM To:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc:Ryan Clark <rclark@chengineers.com> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR Hey Brian. An alternative number is (406) 404-7520. We have been having some issues with the busy tone but this number will bypass it. Anyways, what I wanted to discuss was how the multi-family units are calculated for water rights. From the spreadsheets you sent over, it appears that 1 MF unit is the same as 1 single family unit. Lots 1-3 of Block 13 had 3 MF units of water rights paid with the final plat of Phase 4. With this site plan (Lots 2 & 3 of Block 13), there are two multi- family buildings, each with 18 dwelling units. It appears the City is requesting that Norton Homes now pay the additional 34 MF units of water rights because only 2 units were paid for. It was mine and Doug Lee’s understanding that the 1 MF unit covered the MF building. If you could clarify how the MF unit is calculated, I can send that information over to Doug and Kevin to get their sign off. Thanks Brian! Luke Stein, E.I. Project Manager www.chengineers.com From:Brian Heaston [mailto:bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET] Sent:Friday, September 11, 2020 9:02 AM To:L Stein <lstein@chengineers.com> Cc:Ryan Clark <rclark@chengineers.com> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR Luke –re: your VM, I tried calling a couple times but am getting the ‘busy tone’.You’ll have to phone me to talk, or ask your question here and I’ll reply in email. From:Brian Heaston Sent:Thursday, September 10, 2020 10:48 AM To:'L Stein' <lstein@chengineers.com> Cc:Ryan Clark <rclark@chengineers.com> Subject:RE: Fallon Apartments -CILWR One MF unit for each lot was paid with the Ph 4 subdivision.Concept level CILWR attached here. Kevin Spencer has a significant holding of CILWR credits available for his use.The CILWR required for Fallon Street Apts can access these credits upon written confirmation from Kevin or one of his authorized representatives.With the site plan filing, please indicate in the materials which route will be taken (payment of cash, or use of existing credits). Let me know if you have any questions, Brian 4 From:L Stein <lstein@chengineers.com> Sent:Thursday, September 3, 2020 9:28 AM To:Brian Heaston <bheaston@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc:Ryan Clark <rclark@chengineers.com> Subject:Fallon Apartments -CILWR Good morning Brian, I hope all has been well! Can you confirm if water rights were provided for Lots 2 &3, Block 13, Norton Ranch Subdivision, Phase 4 (plat attached) The proposal includes two new apartment buildings, each 18-units (36 total for the project). I’ve attached a draft layout of the site for your reference. If water rights were previously provided –do they cover this proposed use? Thanks, Luke Stein, E.I. Project Manager www.chengineers.com City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record 5 retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law.