HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-12-21 Agenda and Packet MaterialsA.Call meeting to order - 7:30 AM
Via Webex:
https://cityofbozeman.webex.com/cityofbozeman/onstage/g.php?
MTID=ebba7afbbadb49dd083ee050d9ff646e0
Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit.
Click Join Now to enter the meeting
Via Phone:
This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream or channel 190
• Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-479-3208
• Access code: 182 677 6300
B.Disclosures
C.Changes to the Agenda
D.Public Service Announcements
E.Approval of Minutes
E.1 Approval of July Minutes (Veselik)
F.Public Comment
Please state your name and address in an audible tone of voice for the record. This is the time for
individuals to comment on matters falling within the purview of the Committee. There will also be
an opportunity in conjunction with each action item for comments pertaining to that item. Please
limit your comments to three minutes.
G.Action Items
G.1 Resolution 2021-05: A resolution of the Parking Commission of the City of Bozeman,
Montana, About Parking Requirements in the Unified Development Code(Veselik)
H.FYI/Discussion
H.1 Capacity Subcommittee of the Bozeman Parking Commission Report (Veselik)
H.2 Parking Manager Report(Veselik)
I.Adjournment
THE PARKING COMMISSION OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
PC AGENDA
Thursday, August 12, 2021
1
For more information please contact Mike Veselik, mveselik@bozeman.net.
This board generally meets the second Thursday of the month from 07:30 am to 10:00 am.
Committee meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and require
assistance, please contact our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray at 582-3232 (TDD 582-2301).
2
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Parking Commission
FROM:Veselik
SUBJECT:Approval of July Minutes
MEETING DATE:August 12, 2021
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:Approve
STRATEGIC PLAN:7.3 Best Practices, Creativity & Foresight: Utilize best practices, innovative
approaches, and constantly anticipate new directions and changes relevant
to the governance of the City. Be also adaptable and flexible with an
outward focus on the customer and an external understanding of the issues
as others may see them.
BACKGROUND:Minutes from the July 2021 meeting of the Bozeman Parking Commission.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:No Unresolved
ALTERNATIVES:None
FISCAL EFFECTS:None
Report compiled on: August 5, 2021
3
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Parking Commission
FROM:Mike Veselik, Interim Parking Manager
SUBJECT:Resolution 2021-05: A resolution of the Parking Commission of the City of
Bozeman, Montana, About Parking Requirements in the Unified
Development Code
MEETING DATE:August 12, 2021
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:Approve
STRATEGIC PLAN:4.4 Vibrant Downtown, Districts & Centers: Promote a healthy, vibrant
Downtown, Midtown, and other commercial districts and neighborhood
centers – including higher densities and intensification of use in these key
areas.
BACKGROUND:The Policy Subcommittee is bringing a recommendation to reduce parking
minimums by use in the Unified Development Code.
Included in the packet materials are email communications related to the
Policy Subcommittee's work in developing the recommendation.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None
ALTERNATIVES:None suggested
FISCAL EFFECTS:No Fiscal Effect
Attachments:
Resolution 2021-05 Parking Requirements in Unified
Development Code.docx
Bozeman, MT Parking Minimums in UDC.pdf
UDC Parking Minimums Packet Materials.pdf
June 14 Email FW Public Records Rule for the Parking
Subcommittees.pdf
Clerk email to Policy Subcommittee RE_ Parking Minimums
Resolution 1.pdf
Clerk email to Policy Subcommittee RE_ Parking Minimums
Resolution 2.pdf
Krueger Response to Clerk Email 1.pdf
Krueger Response to Clerk Email 2.pdf
4
Egge Response to Clerk Email.pdf
Neubauer Response to Clerk Email.pdf
Report compiled on: August 5, 2021
5
Resolution 2021-05 Parking Requirements in the Unified Development Code Page 1 of 3
BOZEMAN PARKING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 2021-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PARKING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA,
ABOUT PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE.
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has granted the Parking Commission authority to manage
parking in the downtown area and any other parking permit areas (MCA7-14-4634); and,
WHEREAS, the Bozeman Parking Commission authorized the creation of subcommittees
in Resolution 2021-03 and the Policy Subcommittee has identified parking minimum reductions
as top priority for their work: and,
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Strategic Plan identifies a Well Planned City (Goal 4) as a
key priority for the City and also identifies a vibrant downtown, districts and centers (4.4) and a
high quality urban approach (4.2) as sub goals: and,
WHEREAS, the 2016 Downtown Parking Strategic Management Plan Strategy 7 is for the
Parking Commission and Parking Services to evaluate code-based parking minimums; and,
WHEREAS, the 2019 Downtown Bozeman Strategic Plan’s Goal 3, The Heart of a Thriving
City, calls for simplified parking requirements for the downtown core; and,
WHEREAS, the Parking Commission has the ability to submit comments to the Zoning and
Planning Board as well as the Department of Community Development during the October 2021
Unified Development Code rewrite: and,
WHEREAS, parking space can range from $3,000 for surface lot spaces to more than
$60,000 for underground structure parking and are a main driver of costs for new development;
and,
WHEREAS, unnecessary parking requirements drives up the cost of both residential and
commercial construction which burdens residents and business owners; and,
WHEREAS, reducing parking minimums is an identified strategy for the City of Bozeman
to meet the goals laid out in the 2020 Climate Action Plan: and,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Bozeman Parking Commission recommends
the Bozeman City Commission and Planning and Zoning Commissions adopt the below parking
6
Resolution 2021-05 Parking Requirements in the Unified Development Code Page 2 of 3
requirements in the Unified Development Code for residential, commercial, and mixed use
developments:
1. A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned space
2. A maximum of three surface parking spaces per 1000 SF of conditioned space
3. Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking space (e.g. 1400 SF = 1
parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parking spaces), to the nearest square foot and with halves
rounded up
4. For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial and residential uses shall be
calculated separately, with a reduction of up to 50% of the lesser of the two requirements
allowed
5. Affordable housing developments, developments within one half mile of high frequency
transit stops, and redevelopments of less than 5000 SF are exempted from required
minimums
6. No additional credits or reductionsare given or allowed except for a residential allowance
of one parking space per 24 linear feet of parkable curb frontage (or alternative parking
arrangement approved by the City)
7. Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments, are available through a
Planned Unit Development, subject to City Commission review and approval
Further, the Bozeman Parking Commission recommends the Planning and Community
Development Department and the City Commission use the below definitions for conditioned
space, affordable housing, and High Frequency Transit”
1. Conditioned space: insulated, heated or cooled space, to include livable and leasable
space, exclusive of garages, storage areas, and other spaces not intended for habitation
or commercial use
2. Affordable housing: as defined in Bozeman Municipal Code Sec. 38.700.020.
3. High frequency transit: transit service meeting currently defined standards of “transit
availability” and having headways of 20 minutes or less (acknowledging that Bozeman
currently does not currently have any service that would meet this standard)
Passed and adopted by the Parking Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a session
held on the 12th day of August 2021.
______________________________________
Jim Ness, Chair
Bozeman Parking Commission
7
Resolution 2021-05 Parking Requirements in the Unified Development Code Page 3 of 3
ATTEST:
___________________________
Mike Veselik, Interim Parking Manager
City of Bozeman
8
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
1/11
A.
1.
a.
(1)
Sec. 38.540.050. - Number of parking spaces required.
The following minimum number of off-street, paved parking spaces for motor vehicles and bicycles must be
provided and maintained by ownership, easement and/or lease for and during the life of the respective uses
hereinafter set forth. When calculation of the required parking results in a fraction of a parking space being
required, the fractional space is not required to be provided.
Residential uses.
Minimum requirements. The number of spaces shown in Table 38.540.050-1 must be provided subject to
the adjustments allowed in this subsection 1. Parking stalls required pursuant to the Americans with
Disabilities Act or other similar federal or state law may be provided from the minimum number of
required parking stalls. All site plans submitted for permit purposes must identify parking space
allocations. Fees may be charged by the landowner for the use of required parking spaces.
One parking space for each 24 uninterrupted linear feet of available street frontage usable for on-
street parking directly adjacent to a lot may be deducted from the total parking spaces required for a
development. The number of on-street spaces calculated may not exceed the number of dwellings on
the lot. The width of drive accesses, designated non-parking areas, vision triangles, and similar
circumstances may not be considered to be available for the purpose of on-street parking space.
Table 38.540.050-1
Dwelling Types Parking Spaces Required per Dwelling
Accessory dwelling unit 1
Lodginghouse 0.75 spaces per person of approved capacity
E ciency unit 1.25 (1.0 in R-5)
One-bedroom 1.5 (1.25 in R-5)
Two-bedroom 2 (1.75 in R-5)
Three-bedroom 3 (2.5 in R-5)
Dwellings with more than three bedrooms 4 (3 in R-5)
Group homes and community residential facilities 0.75 spaces per person of approved capacity
Bed and breakfast 1 space/rental unit
Manufactured home 2
All types of dwellings within the B-3 district 1
1
9
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
2/11
b.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Group living /cooperative
household/fraternity/sorority
1 space per resident
Transitional and emergency housing 0.25 spaces per person of approved capacity
A facility may request to provide fewer parking spaces if the applicant provides evidence that some or all
residents are prohibited from operating motor vehicles. Under no condition may less than two parking
spaces be provided. If the use of the facility is altered to serve a different population who may operate motor
vehicles, then the additional required parking must be provided before the change in use may occur.
Additional services and facilities to serve non-residents must provide parking in accordance with this Table
38.540.050-3.
Adjustments to minimum requirements.
Affordable housing. When calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as
defined in section 38.700.020 of this chapter, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable
housing for a minimum period of 20 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term
monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, required parking spaces
must be calculated based on number of bedrooms outlined in Table 38.540.050-1, but may not
exceed two spaces per unit.
Residential uses in mixed-use projects. In order to utilize this section, the long term availability of the
non-residential parking spaces upon which the use of this section was based must be ensured to the
residents of the project. For the purpose of this section a building is considered mixed-use if the non-
residential portion of the building is at least one-quarter of the gross square feet not used for
parking. Residences in mixed-use buildings may count on-street parking per subsection 1.a.(1) of this
section even if the area is subject to occupancy time limits. The use of this section does not preclude
the use of other sections of this chapter which may have the effect of reducing the required amount
of parking. When calculating the amount of required parking for residential uses within a mixed-use
project the amount of parking may be reduced subject to Table 38.540.050-2.
Table 38.540.050-2
Reduction
Allowed
Ratio of Required Non-residential to Required Residential Parking
Spaces
50%Greater than 1:1 but less than 3:1
100%Equal to or greater than 3:1
A car-sharing agreement meeting the criteria established by the community development director
may be used to meet the required number of parking spaces. To use this option the development
1
1, 2
1
2
10
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
3/11
(4)
2.
a.
b.
must have more than five dwelling units. Each vehicle provided through a car sharing agreement
counts as required parking at a ratio of one dedicated car-share space to five standard spaces, up to a
maximum of 50 percent of the total required residential parking.
Transit availability. A residential development subject to site plan review may take a ten percent
reduction in required parking spaces where the development is within 800 feet of a developed and
serviced transit stop. For the purpose of this subsection a transit stop is eligible when it has a shelter
installed which meets the standards of and is approved by the transit provider, and service is
provided on not less than an hourly schedule a minimum of five days per week.
Non-residential uses.
Minimum requirements. The number of spaces shown in Table 38.540.050-3 must be provided subject to
the adjustments allowed by this division 38.540. Spaces are not required to be provided free to the user.
The required number of disabled parking stalls required by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) may be provided from the minimum number of required parking stalls.
Accessible spaces count towards satisfying minimum parking requirements. All site plans submitted for
permit purposes must identify parking space allocations. When a use is not included in Table 38.540.050-
2, the review authority will determine the appropriate classification for the purpose of required parking.
Maximum parking. Provision of parking spaces in excess of 125 percent of the minimum number of
spaces required for the net floor area in this subsection 2 is not permitted.
Table 38.540.050-3
Use Type O -Street or O -Road Parking Spaces Required
Automobile sales 1 space per 200 square feet of indoor oor area; plus 1 space per 20 outdoor
vehicle display spaces
Automobile service
and/or repair station
2 spaces per service stall, but no less than 4 spaces
Automobile washing
establishment
Automatic
drive-through
3 spaces or 1 for each employee on maximum shift; plus stacking space
Self-service 2 spaces per stall not including washing or drying spaces
Bank, nancial
institutions
1 space per 300 square feet of oor area
Bowling alley 2 spaces per lane; plus 2 spaces per billiard table; plus
11
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
4/11
Church 1 space per six persons of maximum occupancy load (as identi ed in the
International Building Code) for main assembly hall, public assembly areas and
classrooms
Community or
recreation center
1 space per 200 square feet of oor area
Community
residential facility
with more than 9
residents or age
restricted housing
1 space per unit
Health and exercise
establishment
1 space per 200 square feet of oor area; plus 3 spaces per court
Day care centers 1 space per sta member plus 1 space per 15 children permitted
Furniture stores over
20,000 square feet
3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of oor area
Golf courses 1 space per 200 square feet of main building oor area; plus 1 space for every 2
practice tees in driving range; plus 4 spaces per each green in the playing area
Hospitals 1 space per bed.
Medical and dental
o ces
4 spaces for each full-time equivalent doctor or dentist; plus 1 space for each full-
time equivalent employee
Manufacturing and
industrial uses
1 space per 1,000 square feet of oor area, plus 1 space per 2 employees on
maximum working shift
Motels, Hotels 1.1 spaces per each guest room; plus 1 space per employee on maximum shift;
plus spaces for accessory uses as follows:
Restaurants, bars,
dining rooms
1 space per 60 square feet of indoor public serving area; plus 1 space per 120
square feet of outdoor (patio) area
Commercial area 1 space per each 400 square feet of oor area
12
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
5/11
Public assembly
areas
1 space for each 5 seats based upon design capacity, except that total o -street
parking for public assembly may be reduced by 1 space for every 4 guest rooms
Nursing homes, rest
homes or similar uses
4 spaces; plus 1 space for each 3 beds; plus 1 space for each employee on
maximum shift
O ces (except
medical and dental)
1 space per 250 square feet of oor area
Outdoor sales (plant
nurseries, building
materials, equipment
rental and similar)
1 space per 500 square feet of sales and/or display area. The size of the sales
and/or display area will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Restaurants, cafes,
bars and similar uses
1 space per 50 square feet of indoor public serving area; plus 1 space per 100
square feet of outdoor (patio) area
Retail store and
service
establishments
1 space per 300 square feet of oor area
Sales sites; model
homes
1 space per 250 square feet of model oor areas; plus 1 space per employee
Schools
Elementary and/or
junior high
1.5 spaces for each classroom, library, lecture hall and cafeteria; plus 1 space for
each 3 xed seats in the area of public assembly, or 1 space for each 25 square
feet of area available for public assembly if xed seats are not provided
Senior high 1.5 spaces for each classroom or lecture hall; plus 1 space per each 5 students;
plus 1 space for each nonteaching employee; plus 1 space per each 3 xed seats in
the area of public assembly, or 1 space per 25 square feet of area available for
public assembly if xed seats are not provided
Business or similar
school
1 space for each 1.5 students
Theater, auditorium
or similar
1 space per 4 seats based upon place of assembly design capacity
13
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
6/11
c.
(1)
(2)
Warehousing, storage
or handling of bulk
goods
1 space per 1,000 square feet of oor area devoted to storage of goods; plus
appropriate spaces to support accessory o ce or retail sales facilities at 1 space
per 350 square feet of oor area
Adjustments to minimum requirements. To implement the city's adopted growth policy, adjustment of
parking requirements within certain areas of the city is desired. Use of this section may not be considered
as joint use of parking or off-site parking regulated by sections 38.540.060 and 38.540.070, nor does the
use of this section preclude the use of other sections of this chapter which may have the effect of
reducing the required amount of on-site parking. More than one adjustment may apply. Multiple
adjustments are added together to modify the minimum required parking from Table 38.540.050-3 in a
single operation. Multiple adjustments are not applied sequentially.
Neighborhood commercial. Within the B-1 and R-O zoning districts implementing a small scale
Community Commercial Mixed Use growth policy designation or the B-3 zoning district, the parking
requirements for non-residential uses may be reduced.
Table 38.540.050-4
Use Allowable Reduction
Retail 40 percent
Restaurant 50 percent
O ce 20 percent
All others 30 percent
Community commercial and residential emphasis mixed use. Within zoning districts lying within a
commercial node, as defined in section 38.700.040 of this chapter, and the REMU district the parking
requirements for non-residential uses may be reduced.
Table 38.540.050-5
Use Allowable Reduction
Retail 20 percent
Restaurant 30 percent
O ce 10 percent
14
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
7/11
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
a.
b.
3.
a.
b.
(1)
(2)
All others 10 percent
Transit availability. Required parking may be reduced by ten percent in circumstances where the
development is within 800 feet of a developed and serviced transit stop. For the purpose of this
subsection a transit stop is eligible when it has publicly available cover from weather approved by the
transit provider to be equivalent to a transit shelter, and service is provided on not less than an
hourly schedule a minimum of five days per week.
Structured parking. An additional 15 percent reduction may be taken when the site is within 800 feet
of a parking structure of at least 200 spaces, which is available to the general public, and for which a
fee for parking is charged.
The first 3,000 gross square feet of a non-residential building within the B-3 district or adjacent to
designated storefront block frontage per section 38.500.010 is not included in the calculation of
required parking.
Property owners' have the option of requesting the reduction of up to ten percent of the required
parking spaces for non-residential uses if:
In addition to the minimum otherwise required by this chapter, two covered bicycle parking
spaces are provided for each automobile space not provided; and
For each ten or fraction of ten automobile parking stalls reduced, a non-residential shower,
changing area, and five clothing lockers are provided on-site.
Exceptions to these parking requirements. Because some situations (i.e., existing lots which have no
landscaping, irregular lots, lots with topographic difficulties, etc.) would benefit from an alternative to the
required maximum parking areas; because the community's appearance could benefit from additional
landscaping, streetscaping and sculptural elements; and because parking exceptions and/or landscaping
would encourage development within existing city boundaries; the following alternatives may be permitted.
These alternatives may be proposed by the developer for review by the ADR staff. Such proposals may be
approved based on a determination that such alternatives meet the following requirements and will not
create a congested on-street parking situation in the vicinity of the proposal:
Landscaping in lieu of parking. Except in the B-3 district, property owners' have the option of requesting
the deletion of up to five required spaces or ten percent of the required parking spaces, whichever is less,
if 350 square feet of landscaping, trees or streetscaping is installed on the property for each space so
deleted. This does not decrease the amount of landscaping that would have been required with full
parking, but is in addition to such landscaping. This option must be approved by the ADR staff. These
improvements must be placed in the public right-of-way or setbacks directly facing the right-of-way.
Cash-in-lieu modifications to parking requirements in B-3 district. Where all or part of the required
parking spaces cannot be provided for a proposed use in the B-3 District, either through ownership or
lease of the necessary land, the petitioner may satisfy the parking requirements by providing an
equivalent cash-in-lieu payment according to the following provisions:
No building permit must be issued, nor must any use of property be initiated, unless a satisfactory
cash-in-lieu payment is received by the department of administrative services;
The parking commission must review and consider all requests for cash-in-lieu payments and furnish
15
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
8/11
(3)
(4)
(a)
4.
a.
b.
c.
d.
5.
a.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
a written and dated certificate, signed by the parking commission chair, authorizing cash-in-lieu
payments. A copy of this certificate must be presented to the chief building official and community
development director before a building permit is issued or the use instituted;
For each required parking space not provided, payment must be made to the city administrative
services department as specified by standard payment requirements established by the parking
commission;
All real property assessed by special improvement district (SID) No. 565, or other similarly adopted
improvement districts designed to provide additional parking spaces within the B-3 district, will not be
required to provide additional parking spaces beyond those required at the time of the SID adoption,
provided the use of the real property and improvements remains unchanged from the initial
assessments of SID No. 565, or other similarly adopted improvement districts;
In the event that a new use or an expansion is initiated on any portion of real property or
improvements are made subsequent to the assessments for SID No. 565 or other similarly
adopted improvement districts, then parking space requirements must be satisfied prior to
initiation of those new or expanded uses.
Bicycle parking required. All site development, exclusive of those qualifying for sketch plan review per
division 38.230 of this chapter, must provide bicycle parking facilities to accommodate bicycle-riding
residents and/or employees and customers of the proposed development. The number of bicycle parking
spaces must be at least ten percent of the number of automobile parking stalls required by Tables
38.540.050-1 and 38.540.050-3 before the use of any special exception or modification, but must in no case
be less than two.
Required bicycle parking must be provided in a safe, accessible and convenient location. Directional
signage must be installed when bicycle parking facilities are not readily visible from the street, sidewalk,
or main building entrance. Installation of bicycle parking must allow for adequate clearance for bicycles
and their riders.
Bicycle parking may be provided in a common area to serve multiple buildings. The common area must
be within 100 feet of each served building.
Covered bicycle parking is encouraged.
Bicycle parking is permitted in required front or rear setbacks. Covered parking may be integrated with
required weather protection features. Alternate designs will be considered by the review authority
provided the alternate design meets or exceeds the intent of this standard
Bicycle parking standards. The intent of this sub section is to ensure required bicycle racks are designed so
bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience and will be reasonably safeguarded
from accidental damage.
Bicycle racks must hold bicycles securely, and meet the following criteria:
Support the frame of the bicycle and not just one wheel.
Allow the frame and one wheel to be locked to the rack when both wheels are left on the bike.
Allow the frame and both wheels to be locked to the rack if the front wheel is removed.
Allow the use of either a cable or U-shaped lock.
Be permanently anchored to an all season surface such as pavement, patio stones, or other similar
surface, and be located such that it will not become buried by snow removal operations.
Be usable by bikes with no kickstand.
16
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
9/11
(7)
(8)
b.
c.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
6.
a.
b.
Be usable by bikes with water bottle cages.
Be usable by a wide variety of sizes and types of bicycle.
Preferred bike rack styles are inverted U, coat hanger, or post and loop racks. Other styles which meet
the standards above are acceptable, including enclosed bicycle lockers. Comb and wave style racks do not
meet the required standard.
Bicycle parking location:
Bicycle parking must be located within 50 feet on an entrance to the building the bicycle parking is
required to serve.
Covered bicycle parking is recommended wherever possible.
Bicycle parking may be provided within a building, but the location must be easily accessible.
Up to 50 percent or 12 spaces, whichever is less, of required bicycle parking may be located in a
required setback(s). Parking area may not interfere with any functional aspect of the site including
stormwater facilities, pedestrian circulation, landscaping requirements, etc.
Bicycle parking may be located in required front setbacks, but may not occupy more than one-quarter
of the total area of a required front setback on an individual street frontage. Departures will be
considered (per section 38.250.060) for covered bicycle parking or exceptional design.
Screening with landscaping or other means of bicycle parking is not required.
Bicycle parking is not permitted within a public street ROW unless prior written authorization is
granted by the city engineer for a perpetual encroachment easement.
Bicycle racks and the area required for parking and maneuvering must meet the following standards:
Bicycle parking spaces must be at least six feet long and two feet wide, and in;
Covered situations the overhead clearance must be at least seven feet.
An aisle for bicycle maneuvering must be provided and maintained beside or between each row
of bicycle parking. This aisle must be at least five feet wide.
Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle.
Areas set aside for bicycle parking must be clearly marked and reserved for bicycle parking only.
B-2M district.
Minimum requirements. The number of spaces shown in Table 38.540.050-6 shall be provided subject to
the adjustments and exceptions allowed in this subsection.
Maximum parking. Provision of parking spaces in excess of the minimum number of spaces required in
Table 38.540.050-3 is not permitted.
Table 38.540.050-6
Use Minimum Parking Spaces
Required
Minimum Bicycle Parking Spaces
Required
Residential 1 per unit 1 per unit
Commercial 2 per 1,000 square feet of gross
oor area
1 per 1,000 square feet of gross
oor area
17
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
10/11
c.
d.
e.
A.
1.
2.
Restaurant 5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
oor area
2.5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
oor area
Hotels, Motels 0.8 per guest room 2 per 5,000 square feet of gross
oor area
Arts and/or Entertainment Center 5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
oor area
2.5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
oor area
Manufacturing 2 per 1,000 square feet of gross
oor area
2 per 5,000 square feet of gross
oor area
Adjustments to minimum requirements. No reductions in required parking spaces may be taken for any
development within the B-2M zoning district, except pursuant to 38.540.060, Joint use of parking facilities.
Requirements within the Midtown Urban Renewal District in the B-2M zoning district. The minimum
parking requirements of this section do not apply within the Midtown Urban Renewal District the
boundary of which is described in the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan adopted pursuant to Ordinance 1925
and incorporated herein. All other requirements of this section, including bicycle parking, maximum
parking and standards when parking is provided, are applicable.
Off-site parking. Any off-site parking used to meet the requirements of this chapter for development in
the B-2M zoning district must comply with 38.540.060, except that off-site parking for multiple household
dwellings may not be located more than 1,000 feet from any commonly used entrance of the principle
use served.
(Ord. No. 1997 , § 4, 3-19-2018; Ord. No. 2014 , §§ 13, 14, 6-3-2019; Ord. No. 2029 , § 10, 12-18-2019; Order No. 2020-02 , § 1,
11-17-2020)
Sec. 38.540.060. - Joint use of parking facilities.
Up to 80 percent of the non-residential parking spaces required by this division 38.540 may be provided through shared
parking, subject to the requirements in subsections A and B of this section.
Shared parking may be requested if parking can be provided to serve two or more individual land uses
without conflict or encroachment. The review authority may make a determination for shared parking
arrangements based on a traffic survey or traffic impact study for the site based on the following:
At a minimum, a traffic survey or traffic impact study must examine for all potential uses: trip generation,
hours of operation, quantity of required parking spaces, quantity of spaces that will be filled during peak
hour periods, and any unusual events that may occur during the year that will exceed the average
parking requirement. The study must indicate that adequate parking exists to meet the demand of
potential uses served as well as meet technical requirements as specified by the review authority.
The parties sharing parking spaces must enter into a long-term joint use agreement revocable with
review authority approval, running with the term of the designated uses.
18
8/5/2021 Bozeman, MT Code of Ordinances
11/11
B.
1.
2.
3.
A.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Conditions required for joint use.
The building or use for which application is being made to utilize the off-street parking facilities provided
by another building or use must be located within 1,000 feet of such parking facilities as measured by the
route of travel from the nearest parking space to the commonly used entrance of the principal use
served;
The applicant must show that there is no substantial overlap in the operating hours of the two buildings
or uses for which joint use of off-street parking facilities is proposed; and
A properly drawn legal instrument, executed by the parties concerned for joint use of off-street parking
facilities, duly approved as to form and manner of execution by the city attorney, must be filed with the
city clerk and recorded with the county clerk and recorder.
Sec. 38.540.070. - O -site parking.
Any off-site parking used to meet the requirements of this chapter must be reviewed by the community
development director for compliance with this chapter and will be subject to the following conditions:
Off-site parking must be developed and maintained in compliance with all requirements and standards of
this chapter;
Reasonable continuous pedestrian and vehicle access from off-site parking facilities to the use being served
must be provided;
Off-site parking for one-household and two-household dwellings is not permitted;
Off-site parking for multiple household dwellings may not be located more than 300 feet from any commonly
used entrance of the principal use served;
Off-site parking for non-residential uses may not be located more than 1,000 feet from the entrance of the
principal use. The distance is measured on a pedestrian route of travel such as a sidewalk or city standard
trail from the nearest parking space to the entrance of the principal use served; and
Any use which depends upon off-site parking to meet the requirements of this chapter must maintain
ownership or provide evidence of a long-term lease agreement, revocable with review authority approval,
running with the term of the designated use, for parking utilization of the off-site location.
(Ord. No. 1994 , § 8, 3-31-2018)
19
1
UDC Parking Minimums Discussion and
Reference Material
5 August 2021
Table of Contents
Memorandum: Recommendations ......................................................................................... 3
Parking Comparisons – 106 E Babcock .................................................................................... 5
Parking Comparisons – Mixed Use .......................................................................................... 9
Parking Comparisons – Residential ........................................................................................ 11
SID 565 Background .............................................................................................................. 12
Parking Recommendations in Currently Adopted Plans .......................................................... 13
2016 Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan ..................................................................... 13
2020 Bozeman Community Plan ..................................................................................................... 13
2020 Bozeman Climate Plan ........................................................................................................... 13
2020 Bozeman Community Housing Action Plan ............................................................................. 14
Bozeman City Commission Strategic Plan ........................................................................................ 15
2019 Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan ................................................................................ 15
Parking Minimums and Maximums in Peer Cities .................................................................. 17
Parking Minimums ......................................................................................................................... 17
Great Falls, MT ................................................................................................................................................... 17
Aspen, CO .......................................................................................................................................................... 17
Whitefish, MT .................................................................................................................................................... 17
Kalispell, MT ...................................................................................................................................................... 18
Open Option Parking - Citywide ...................................................................................................... 19
Minneapolis ....................................................................................................................................................... 19
Sacramento, Berkeley, San Francisco ................................................................................................................ 19
South Bend, IN ................................................................................................................................................... 19
Edmonton, Canada ............................................................................................................................................ 19
Buffalo, NY ......................................................................................................................................................... 19
Open Option Parking - Central Business District .............................................................................. 19
Parking Maximums ......................................................................................................................... 21
Portland, OR ...................................................................................................................................................... 21
Hartford, CT ....................................................................................................................................................... 21
Helena, MT ........................................................................................................................................................ 21
Seattle ................................................................................................................................................................ 21
San Diego, CA ..................................................................................................................................................... 21
20
2
London ............................................................................................................................................................... 21
Zurich ................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Others ................................................................................................................................................................ 22
Existing Bozeman Unified Development Code Parking Requirements ..................................... 23
21
3
Memorandum: Recommendations
5 August 2021
Re: Recommendations from the Policy Subcommittee to the Parking Commission
Relevant Plans: Bozeman City Commission Strategic Plan, 2016 Downtown Strategic Parking
Management Plan, 2020 Bozeman Community Plan, 2020 Bozeman Climate Plan, 2020
Bozeman Community Housing Action Plan; and, 2019 Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan
Any future reductions in parking must be accompanied both by improvements to our
transportation system (making it easier to access destinations by other modes), changes in land
use (leading to more people living near their daily destinations and greater opportunities to
share parking between complimentary uses), and changes in incentives to level the playing field
between driving and other modes.
It is acknowledged that demand for parking will result in the creation of new parking, with or
without code-based minimums.
Mixed-use developments can more easily share parking than single-use developments. Land
use planning and the availability of other modes both play an important role in successfully
reducing parking without causing hardships or harming economic vitality.
Changes in standards should move in the direction of simplification. Current code language
provides numerous exemptions, relaxations, and waivers (credits for bike racks, street frontage,
first 3000 SF free, etc.)—the result of which is frequently complicated calculations to arrive at
actual required parking that is considerably lower than current code tables would suggest at
face value (see the Parking Comparisons, below).
Having reviewed the currently adopted City of Bozeman plans, current practices among peer
cities and policy leaders, and evaluated the impacts proposed changes with respect to recent
and pending City of Bozeman projects, the Policy Subcommittee recommends simplification
and a general reduction of UDC parking requirements as follows:
• A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned space
• A maximum of three surface parking spaces per 1000 SF of conditioned space
• Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking space (e.g. 1400 SF = 1
parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parking spaces), to the nearest square foot and with halves
rounded up
• For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial and residential uses shall be
calculated separately and a reduction allowed of 50% of the lesser of the two
22
4
• Affordable housing developments, developments within one half mile of high frequency
transit stops, and redevelopments of less than 5000 SF are exempted from required
minimums
• No additional credits or reductions are given or allowed except for a residential
allowance of one parking space per 24 linear feet of parkable curb frontage (or
alternative parking arrangement approved by the City)
• Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments, are available through a
Planned Unit Development, subject to City Commission review and approval.
Definitions:
• Conditioned space: insulated, heated or cooled space, to include livable and leasable
space, exclusive of garages, storage areas, and other spaces not intended for habitation
or commercial use
• Affordable housing: as defined in Sec. 38.700.020.
• High frequency transit: transit service meeting currently defined standards of “transit
availability” and having headways of 20 minutes or less (acknowledging that Bozeman
currently does not currently have any service that would meet this standard)
Regarding downtown, all members of the Policy Subcommittee recommend removing
minimums for the downtown core. For the B-3 district outside of the downtown core, discussed
options ranged from a simplified and reduced standard to open option parking throughout the
district. It is acknowledged that adopting “open option” parking for the entire B-3 district
provides a simple and direct solution to resolving the complicated legacy of SID 565.
23
Current Parking Requirements (B-3 Zoning)
106 East Babcock Street
USE
GROSS
AREA
(SF)
NET
AREA (SF)(0.85
Multiplier) FACTOR REQUIRED SPACES
Main Floor
(Existing + New)
(less 3,000 B-3
Reduction)
13,461
(less 3,000
B-3
Reduction)
11,442 1 per 250 SF 45.8
Basement
(Existing + New)
15,179 12,902 1 per 250 SF 51.6
Second Floor
Addition
8,023 6,820 1 per 250 SF 27.3
Third Floor Addition 7,176 6,100 1 per 250 SF 24.4
SUBTOTAL 43,839 37,264 149.1
APPLICABLE PARKING REDUCTIONS
B-3 Office Use Designation 20%
Transit Availability—Covered Bus Stop 10%
Structured Parking within 800 feet 15%
Covered Bike Parking and Showers Provided 10%
TOTAL APPLICABLE PARKING REDUCTIONS 55% -82.01
PARKING REQUIRED AFTER REDUCTIONS 67.09
SID 565 -19.5
REQUIRED SPACES 47.6
PROPOSED SPACES ON-SITE 51
24
106 East Babcock Street
Current Parking Requirements (B-2M Zoning)
Parking Demand Calculations Parking Required
Office (46,839 gfa)93 spaces (2 x 1,000 sf)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 93 spaces
Policy Subcommittee Notes
• In the B-3 and B-2M zones 1 space per residential unit is required
• Bike parking for B-3 example is 14 spaces, 9 spaces in B-2M example
25
106 East Babcock Street
Proposed Parking Requirements (B-3 Zoning)
Parking Demand Calculations Parking Required
Office (46,839 gfa)47 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 47 spaces
26
106 East Babcock Street
Proposed Parking Requirements (Mixed-Use)
Parking Demand Calculations Parking Required
Office (31,640 conditioned area)31 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf)
Residential (15,199 conditioned area)15 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf - less half of lower required)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 38 spaces (Includes reduction for Mixed-Use)
Policy Subcommittee Notes
• In this example, the project created 80% of the parking required under B-3 and 40% of that in
B-2M. Max parking would be 138 spaces
• If example project built under current code with allowable reductions for mixed use 43 spaces
would have been required, with an additional reduction of 19 spaces available under SID 965.
Total parking required would therefore have been 24 spaces. (Calculations not included)
• Bike parking required would be 4 spaces - Recommend two bike parking spaces required per
required vehicle parking before reductions
27
Current Parking Requirements (REMU Zoning)
Parking Demand Calculations Parking Required
Office (41,830 gfa)142 spaces (1 x 250 sf)
Restaurant (8,265 gfa)140 spaces (1 x 50 sf)
Arts & Entertainment Center (6,850 gfa)25 spaces (1 space x 4 seats)
Retail (4,150 gfa)11 spaces (1 x 300 sf)
1-bedroom unit (10 units)15 spaces (1.5 per unit)
2-bedroom unit (5 units)10 spaces (2 per unit)
3-bedroom unit (6 units)18 spaces (3 per unit)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 216 spaces (w/ reductions, no residential required)
Mixed Use
28
Proposed Parking Requirements (REMU Zoning)
Parking Demand Calculations Parking Required
Office (41,830 gfa)42 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf)
Restaurant (8,265 gfa)8 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf)
Arts & Entertainment Center (6,850 gfa)7 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf)
Retail (4,150 gfa)4 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf)
Residential Units - Same Mix as Above Ex.
(35,537 gfa)
36 spaces (1 x 1,000 sf - less half of lower re-
quired)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 79 spaces (Includes reduction for Mixed-Use)
Policy Subcommittee Notes
• In this example, the project created ~37% of the parking required under current code require-
ments. Max parking would be 291 spaces
Mixed Use
29
Current Parking Requirements (REMU Zoning)
Parking Demand Calculations Parking Required
1-bedroom unit (10 units)15 spaces (1.5 per unit)
2-bedroom unit (5 units)10 spaces (2 per unit)
3-bedroom unit (6 units)18 spaces (3 per unit)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 43 spaces
Policy Subcommittee Notes
• Reductions for adjacent on-street of one parking space per 24 linear feet of parkable curb
frontage (or alternative parking arrangement approved by the City)
Residential Project
30
Proposed Parking Requirements (Residential Zoning)
Parking Demand Calculations Parking Required
1-bedroom unit (10 units x 900 sf)9 spaces (1 per 1,000 sf)
2-bedroom unit (5 units x 1,000 sf)5 spaces (1 per 1,000 sf)
3-bedroom unit (6 units x 1,100 sf)6 spaces (1 per 1,000 sf)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 20 spaces
Policy Subcommittee Notes
• In this example, the project created ~47% of the parking required under current code require-
ments. Max parking would be 60 spaces
• Allowable reductions remain for adjacent on-street parking remains as described above
Residential Project
31
Parking Commission Policy Subcommittee Meeting
June 16, 2021
• Special Improvement District (SID) 565 (Ghost Space): A SID is a method of assessing prop-
erties within a designated area to pay for utilities or improvements including parking. SID No.
565 was originally established in 1978 as a funding mechanism to create new surface parking
lots downtown. Since the creation of those surface lots, the assessment for SID 565 nor pay-
ment of assessments has been made since 1999.
• The Strategic Parking Plan (Strategy 8) called for an investigation of the SID 565 parking spaces.
• Reductions against parking requirements. Needed Parking Spaces (1979) - Available Spaces
(1979) = Total Assigned Spaces.
• Parking is not required beyond those spaces required at the time of the SID adoption, provid-
ed the use of the real property and improvements remains unchanged from the initial assess-
ments of SID No. 565.
• Unclear if the SID may be expired or “sunset.”
Next Steps (Strategy 8 - Strategic Parking Management Plan)
• Initiate a legal review of 38.25.040.A.3.b.(4), BMC to garner an objective ruling as to the con-
tinued applicability of SID No. 565 for current and/or future parking operations or decision-
making related to current parking assets.
• Make appropriate revisions to this section of the code. This could include clarifying revisions
or removal of this provision from the code.
SID 565 Infographic
32
13
Parking Recommendations in Currently Adopted Plans
2016 Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan
STRATEGY 7: Re-evaluate code-based parking minimum requirements (38.25.040 A.2. a & b,
BMC).
Implementation Timeline: Near-Term (by June 2017)
Current code outlines a range of minimum parking requirements for specific land uses. The
consultant’s initial review indicates that the requirements are very high when compared to
other cities, and not calibrated to multi-modal goals. For example, the current minimum
requirement for restaurants is 16.6 stalls per 1,000 SF of interior space, while office starts with
a minimum of 4 stalls per 1,000 SF and retail 3.3 stalls per 1,000 SF. Though provisions in the
code allow for reductions in minimum requirements, the starting point may be too high,
particularly in relation to goals for compact urban form, multi-modalism, and development
costs. Minimums that are not "right-sized" force developers to over-build, and drive down cash-
in-lieu fees. The Bozeman parking code should be re-evaluated to right size-minimums and
simplify implementation.
Bozeman’s current parking code outlines a range of minimum parking requirements for specific
land uses. RWC’s initial review indicates that the minimum requirements are (a) very high when
contrasted with other comparable cities and (b) not calibrated at all to desired multi-modal
goals.
2020 Bozeman Community Plan
Goal DCD-3: Ensure multimodal connectivity within the City.
DCD-3.6 Evaluate parking requirements and methods of providing parking as part of the overall
transportation system for and between districts.
Goal M-1: Ensure multimodal accessibility.
M-1.12 Eliminate parking minimum requirements in commercial districts and affordable
housing areas and reduce parking minimums elsewhere, acknowledging that demand for
parking will still result in new supply being built.
2020 Bozeman Climate Plan
Action 3.G.2. Revise Development Code to Enhance Compact and Sustainable Development
33
14
2020 Bozeman Community Housing Action Plan
On-Going Strategies: Flexible Development Standards
Modified land use regulations in exchange for community housing. May include reductions in
parking, setbacks, open space, height limits, road widths, etc. Quality, compatibility, safety and
neighborhood impacts are concerns.
34
15
Bozeman City Commission Strategic Plan
4.2 High Quality Urban Approach
b) Complete Unified Development Code, Phase 2 - Once the updated Unified Development
Code (UDC) for growth and infrastructure is adopted by City Commission, begin Phase 2 of UDC
to address parking standards and affordable housing and sign code.
c) Parking Management by District - Develop a comprehensive, integrated approach to parking
management for the downtown, midtown, university, and other districts. Consider a range of
solutions including both on-street parking and parking garages.
2019 Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan
Eliminate parking requirements in the “Core Area” and simplify standards for the rest of the B3
zone by eliminating all parking reductions in favor of a flat standard and making shared parking
and off-site parking easier. Institute the following requirements:
• 0.6 spaces per hotel room (including accessory uses up to 20% of the building area)
• 1 space per 1,000 gross square feet for all commercial uses to create a simple “blended
rate.”
35
16
36
17
Parking Minimums and Maximums in Peer Cities
Parking Minimums
Great Falls, MT
Great Falls, retail stores are required to have one space per 240 square feet or for retail larger
than 5,000 square feet, it’s 20 spaces plus one per 300 square foot in excess of 5,000. Source
Aspen, CO
Source
Whitefish, MT
Residential:
• One-family dwelling: 2 spaces per dwelling unit
• Two-family dwelling: 2 spaces per dwelling unit
• Multi-family dwelling: 1.25 spaces per studio/efficiency unit; 1.5 spaces per one-
bedroom unit; 2 spaces per dwelling unit, plus 1 guest space for each 3 units per
two-bedroom or larger units
37
18
Retail or personal service stores: 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area
Kalispell, MT
Residential Single Family Residence, Accessory Single Family, and Duplex: 2
spaces per unit.
Multi-Family: 1 space per efficiency unit and 1.5 spaces per units
with 1 or more bedrooms.
Retail 1 per 300 square feet gross floor area.
Source
38
19
Open Option Parking - Citywide
Minneapolis
2018: The usual ratio of one parking space for every one unit was cut in half for larger
apartment projects and was eliminated entirely for projects with 50 or fewer units located near
high-frequency transit. … Apartment developers proposed projects with fewer parking spaces.
That lowered the cost of construction. So, such projects began offering rents below the
market's established levels. New studio apartments, which typically went for $1,200 per month,
were being offered for less than $1,000 per month. Source
May, 2021: Minneapolis City Council unanimously eliminates parking requirements. Council
President Lisa Bender said that the change aligns with the city's climate and greenhouse gas
emission goals outlined in the Minneapolis 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Source
Sacramento, Berkeley, San Francisco
In January 2021, the Sacramento City Council voted to approve citywide zoning reforms in its
General Plan, including abolishing parking minimums. Sacramento also pledged to begin studies
on parking maximums.
In January 2021, City of Berkeley officials voted to eliminate off-street parking requirements for
new developments. The city also implemented parking maximums in transit-rich areas.
In 2018, San Francisco passed an ordinance that eliminated parking minimums citywide, for all
uses. Parking is no longer required for any new developments anywhere in San Francisco. Most
use types are also prohibited from providing more than 0.5–1.5 spaces, depending on the
zoning of the district. Source
South Bend, IN
[In January 2021] the City of South Bend became the latest US city to make parking optional for
all new homes and business developments. Source
Edmonton, Canada
In 2020, “Eliminating parking minimums paves the way for more diverse, affordable housing
choices, and walkable main street shopping areas and local amenities, such as neighbourhood
coffee shops,” the city release stated. Source
Buffalo, NY
Open Option Parking - Central Business District
• Missoula
• Fargo
• Billings
39
20
• Bismarck, ND
• Eugene, OR
• Ashland, OR
• Ketchum, ID
• Sandpoint, ID (Success Stories)
• Boise, ID
• Fort Collins, CO
• Yakima, WA
• North 7th Ave / Midtown - Bozeman (Article)
40
21
Parking Maximums
Portland, OR
Portland enacted a parking maximum ordinance by creating multiple formulas for different use
categories. For example, a general office category is allowed one parking space per 294 square
feet of office space, maximum. Source
Hartford, CT
Hartford manages parking lot sizes by setting out parking maximums though a table of uses
classifications.
Helena, MT
Establishes maximum parking ratios as a percent above the minimum parking ratio (e.g. no
more than 110% of the minimum for parking lots of more than 51 spaces). Source
Seattle
Seattle allows a maximum of one parking space per 1,000 square feet of office space
downtown, and is considering extending this limit to areas outside of downtown as well. Source
San Diego, CA
Eliminated parking requirements in March 2019 and created maximum of one parking space
per unit for new apartments and condos downtown. Parking spaces must also be unbundled
(that is, parking spaces are leased separately from housing units). Source
London
In 2004, London reversed its parking requirements, eliminating the previous minimums and
putting new maximums on parking supply for all developments in the metropolitan area.
Source
Zurich
Zurich's parking policy evolved from 'conventional' parking minimums in the 1960s to parking
maximums in 1989. An 'historic compromise' was reached in 1996, and the final policy was put
to a public vote in 2010. Source
41
22
Others
Source
42
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 23 of 32
Existing Bozeman Unified Development Code Parking Requirements
As of July, 2021
Sec. 38.540.010. General provisions.
A. Parking is one part of the overall multimodal transportation system. Individual choice of travel mode and
development characteristics influence the need for parking. The purpose of this division 38.540 in requiring
parking spaces is to ensure provision of off-street motor vehicle parking, bicycle parking, and other
transportation access facilities in rough proportion to the generalized parking and transportation demands of
different land uses which locate at a site. Some sites, such as those that are located in close proximity to
transit, have good access to pedestrian facilities or have off-set peak uses may require less on-site parking.
The purpose of these standards is to provide functional parking areas adequate to the needs of users, create
shaded areas within parking lots, reduce glare and heat build-up, reduce stormwater surges, provide visual
relief within paved parking areas, emphasize circulation patterns, avoid the negative impacts associated with
spillover parking into adjacent neighborhoods (while at the same time avoiding the negative environmental
and urban design impacts that can result from excessive parking lots and other vehicular use areas) and
enhance the visual environment. The provisions of this division are also intended to help protect the public
health, safety, and general welfare by: helping avoid and mitigate traffic congestion; encouraging multimodal
transportation options and enhanced pedestrian safety; providing methods to reduce the amount of
impervious surfaces in parking areas and adequate drainage structures in order to reduce the environmental
impacts of stormwater runoff; encouraging paving or alternate means of surfacing of parking areas in order
to address dust abatement and improve air quality; and providing flexible methods of responding to the
transportation and access demands of various land uses in different areas of the city. In achieving these
purposes this division interacts with the requirements of division 38.550 of this chapter. The design of off-
street parking is the responsibility of the developer and must consider traffic circulation, intended
landscaping, pedestrian access and circulation, and other purposes of this chapter.
43
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 24 of 32
Sec. 38.540.050. Number of parking spaces required.
A. The following minimum number of off-street, paved parking spaces for motor vehicles and bicycles must be
provided and maintained by ownership, easement and/or lease for and during the life of the respective uses
hereinafter set forth. When calculation of the required parking results in a fraction of a parking space being
required, the fractional space is not required to be provided.
1. Residential uses.
a. Minimum requirements. The number of spaces shown in Table 38.540.050-1 must be provided
subject to the adjustments allowed in this subsection 1. Parking stalls required pursuant to the
Americans with Disabilities Act or other similar federal or state law may be provided from the
minimum number of required parking stalls. All site plans submitted for permit purposes must
identify parking space allocations. Fees may be charged by the landowner for the use of required
parking spaces.
(1) One parking space for each 24 uninterrupted linear feet of available street frontage usable
for on-street parking directly adjacent to a lot may be deducted from the total parking
spaces required for a development. The number of on-street spaces calculated may not
exceed the number of dwellings on the lot. The width of drive accesses, designated non-
parking areas, vision triangles, and similar circumstances may not be considered to be
available for the purpose of on-street parking space.
Table 38.540.050-1
Dwelling Types Parking Spaces Required per Dwelling
Accessory dwelling unit 1
Lodginghouse 0.75 spaces per person of approved capacity
Efficiency unit 1.25 (1.0 in R-5)
One-bedroom 1.5 (1.25 in R-5)
Two-bedroom 2 (1.75 in R-5)
Three-bedroom 3 (2.5 in R-5)
Dwellings with more than three bedrooms 4 (3 in R-5)
Group homes and community residential facilities 0.75 spaces per person of approved capacity1
Bed and breakfast 1 space/rental unit
Manufactured home 2
All types of dwellings within the B-3 district 1
Group living /cooperative
household/fraternity/sorority
1 space per resident1
Transitional and emergency housing 0.25 spaces per person of approved capacity1, 2
1 A facility may request to provide fewer parking spaces if the applicant provides evidence that some or
all residents are prohibited from operating motor vehicles. Under no condition may less than two
parking spaces be provided. If the use of the facility is altered to serve a different population who may
operate motor vehicles, then the additional required parking must be provided before the change in
use may occur.
2 Additional services and facilities to serve non-residents must provide parking in accordance with this
Table 38.540.050-3.
b. Adjustments to minimum requirements.
44
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 25 of 32
(1) Affordable housing. When calculating the amount of required parking for affordable
housing, as defined in section 38.700.020 of this chapter, if the project is guaranteed for
use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 20 years and the use as affordable
housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as
affordable housing, required parking spaces must be calculated based on number of
bedrooms outlined in Table 38.540.050-1, but may not exceed two spaces per unit.
(2) Residential uses in mixed-use projects. In order to utilize this section, the long term
availability of the non-residential parking spaces upon which the use of this section was
based must be ensured to the residents of the project. For the purpose of this section a
building is considered mixed-use if the non-residential portion of the building is at least
one-quarter of the gross square feet not used for parking. Residences in mixed-use
buildings may count on-street parking per subsection 1.a.(1) of this section even if the area
is subject to occupancy time limits. The use of this section does not preclude the use of
other sections of this chapter which may have the effect of reducing the required amount
of parking. When calculating the amount of required parking for residential uses within a
mixed-use project the amount of parking may be reduced subject to Table 38.540.050-2.
Table 38.540.050-2
Reduction
Allowed
Ratio of Required Non-residential to Required Residential Parking
Spaces
50% Greater than 1:1 but less than 3:1
100% Equal to or greater than 3:1
(3) A car-sharing agreement meeting the criteria established by the community development
director may be used to meet the required number of parking spaces. To use this option
the development must have more than five dwelling units. Each vehicle provided through a
car sharing agreement counts as required parking at a ratio of one dedicated car-share
space to five standard spaces, up to a maximum of 50 percent of the total required
residential parking.
(4) Transit availability. A residential development subject to site plan review may take a ten
percent reduction in required parking spaces where the development is within 800 feet of
a developed and serviced transit stop. For the purpose of this subsection a transit stop is
eligible when it has a shelter installed which meets the standards of and is approved by the
transit provider, and service is provided on not less than an hourly schedule a minimum of
five days per week.
2. Non-residential uses.
a. Minimum requirements. The number of spaces shown in Table 38.540.050-3 must be provided
subject to the adjustments allowed by this division 38.540. Spaces are not required to be
provided free to the user. The required number of disabled parking stalls required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) may be provided from the
minimum number of required parking stalls. Accessible spaces count towards satisfying minimum
parking requirements. All site plans submitted for permit purposes must identify parking space
allocations. When a use is not included in Table 38.540.050-2, the review authority will
determine the appropriate classification for the purpose of required parking.
b. Maximum parking. Provision of parking spaces in excess of 125 percent of the minimum number
of spaces required for the net floor area in this subsection 2 is not permitted.
Table 38.540.050-3
45
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 26 of 32
Use Type Off-Street or Off-Road Parking Spaces Required
Automobile sales 1 space per 200 square feet of indoor floor area; plus 1 space per 20 outdoor vehicle
display spaces
Automobile service
and/or repair station
2 spaces per service stall, but no less than 4 spaces
Automobile washing
establishment
Automatic
drive-through
3 spaces or 1 for each employee on maximum shift; plus stacking space
Self-service 2 spaces per stall not including washing or drying spaces
Bank, financial
institutions
1 space per 300 square feet of floor area
Bowling alley 2 spaces per lane; plus 2 spaces per billiard table; plus
Church 1 space per six persons of maximum occupancy load (as identified in the International
Building Code) for main assembly hall, public assembly areas and classrooms
Community or
recreation center
1 space per 200 square feet of floor area
Community residential
facility with more than
9 residents or age
restricted housing
1 space per unit
Health and exercise
establishment
1 space per 200 square feet of floor area; plus 3 spaces per court
Day care centers 1 space per staff member plus 1 space per 15 children permitted
Furniture stores over
20,000 square feet
3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area
Golf courses 1 space per 200 square feet of main building floor area; plus 1 space for every 2
practice tees in driving range; plus 4 spaces per each green in the playing area
Hospitals 1 space per bed.
Medical and dental
offices
4 spaces for each full-time equivalent doctor or dentist; plus 1 space for each full-time
equivalent employee
Manufacturing and
industrial uses
1 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area, plus 1 space per 2 employees on maximum
working shift
Motels, Hotels 1.1 spaces per each guest room; plus 1 space per employee on maximum shift; plus
spaces for accessory uses as follows:
Restaurants, bars,
dining rooms
1 space per 60 square feet of indoor public serving area; plus 1 space per 120 square
feet of outdoor (patio) area
Commercial area 1 space per each 400 square feet of floor area
Public assembly
areas
1 space for each 5 seats based upon design capacity, except that total off-street
parking for public assembly may be reduced by 1 space for every 4 guest rooms
Nursing homes, rest
homes or similar uses
4 spaces; plus 1 space for each 3 beds; plus 1 space for each employee on maximum
shift
Offices (except
medical and dental)
1 space per 250 square feet of floor area
Outdoor sales (plant
nurseries, building
materials, equipment
rental and similar)
1 space per 500 square feet of sales and/or display area. The size of the sales and/or
display area will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
46
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 27 of 32
Restaurants, cafes,
bars and similar uses
1 space per 50 square feet of indoor public serving area; plus 1 space per 100 square
feet of outdoor (patio) area
Retail store and
service establishments
1 space per 300 square feet of floor area
Sales sites; model
homes
1 space per 250 square feet of model floor areas; plus 1 space per employee
Schools
Elementary and/or
junior high
1.5 spaces for each classroom, library, lecture hall and cafeteria; plus 1 space for each
3 fixed seats in the area of public assembly, or 1 space for each 25 square feet of area
available for public assembly if fixed seats are not provided
Senior high 1.5 spaces for each classroom or lecture hall; plus 1 space per each 5 students; plus 1
space for each nonteaching employee; plus 1 space per each 3 fixed seats in the area
of public assembly, or 1 space per 25 square feet of area available for public assembly
if fixed seats are not provided
Business or similar
school
1 space for each 1.5 students
Theater, auditorium or
similar
1 space per 4 seats based upon place of assembly design capacity
Warehousing, storage
or handling of bulk
goods
1 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area devoted to storage of goods; plus
appropriate spaces to support accessory office or retail sales facilities at 1 space per
350 square feet of floor area
c. Adjustments to minimum requirements. To implement the city's adopted growth policy,
adjustment of parking requirements within certain areas of the city is desired. Use of this section
may not be considered as joint use of parking or off-site parking regulated by sections 38.540.060
and 38.540.070, nor does the use of this section preclude the use of other sections of this
chapter which may have the effect of reducing the required amount of on-site parking. More
than one adjustment may apply. Multiple adjustments are added together to modify the
minimum required parking from Table 38.540.050-3 in a single operation. Multiple adjustments
are not applied sequentially.
(1) Neighborhood commercial. Within the B-1 and R-O zoning districts implementing a small
scale Community Commercial Mixed Use growth policy designation or the B-3 zoning
district, the parking requirements for non-residential uses may be reduced.
Table 38.540.050-4
Use Allowable Reduction
Retail 40 percent
Restaurant 50 percent
Office 20 percent
All others 30 percent
(2) Community commercial and residential emphasis mixed use. Within zoning districts lying
within a commercial node, as defined in section 38.700.040 of this chapter, and the REMU
district the parking requirements for non-residential uses may be reduced.
Table 38.540.050-5
Use Allowable Reduction
Retail 20 percent
47
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 28 of 32
Restaurant 30 percent
Office 10 percent
All others 10 percent
(3) Transit availability. Required parking may be reduced by ten percent in circumstances
where the development is within 800 feet of a developed and serviced transit stop. For the
purpose of this subsection a transit stop is eligible when it has publicly available cover from
weather approved by the transit provider to be equivalent to a transit shelter, and service
is provided on not less than an hourly schedule a minimum of five days per week.
(4) Structured parking. An additional 15 percent reduction may be taken when the site is
within 800 feet of a parking structure of at least 200 spaces, which is available to the
general public, and for which a fee for parking is charged.
(5) The first 3,000 gross square feet of a non-residential building within the B-3 district or
adjacent to designated storefront block frontage per section 38.500.010 is not included in
the calculation of required parking.
(6) Property owners' have the option of requesting the reduction of up to ten percent of the
required parking spaces for non-residential uses if:
a. In addition to the minimum otherwise required by this chapter, two covered
bicycle parking spaces are provided for each automobile space not provided;
and
b. For each ten or fraction of ten automobile parking stalls reduced, a non-
residential shower, changing area, and five clothing lockers are provided on-
site.
3. Exceptions to these parking requirements. Because some situations (i.e., existing lots which have no
landscaping, irregular lots, lots with topographic difficulties, etc.) would benefit from an alternative to
the required maximum parking areas; because the community's appearance could benefit from
additional landscaping, streetscaping and sculptural elements; and because parking exceptions and/or
landscaping would encourage development within existing city boundaries; the following alternatives
may be permitted. These alternatives may be proposed by the developer for review by the ADR staff.
Such proposals may be approved based on a determination that such alternatives meet the following
requirements and will not create a congested on-street parking situation in the vicinity of the proposal:
a. Landscaping in lieu of parking. Except in the B-3 district, property owners' have the option of
requesting the deletion of up to five required spaces or ten percent of the required parking
spaces, whichever is less, if 350 square feet of landscaping, trees or streetscaping is installed on
the property for each space so deleted. This does not decrease the amount of landscaping that
would have been required with full parking, but is in addition to such landscaping. This option
must be approved by the ADR staff. These improvements must be placed in the public right-of-
way or setbacks directly facing the right-of-way.
b. Cash-in-lieu modifications to parking requirements in B-3 district. Where all or part of the
required parking spaces cannot be provided for a proposed use in the B-3 District, either through
ownership or lease of the necessary land, the petitioner may satisfy the parking requirements by
providing an equivalent cash-in-lieu payment according to the following provisions:
(1) No building permit must be issued, nor must any use of property be initiated, unless a
satisfactory cash-in-lieu payment is received by the department of administrative services;
48
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 29 of 32
(2) The parking commission must review and consider all requests for cash-in-lieu payments
and furnish a written and dated certificate, signed by the parking commission chair,
authorizing cash-in-lieu payments. A copy of this certificate must be presented to the chief
building official and community development director before a building permit is issued or
the use instituted;
(3) For each required parking space not provided, payment must be made to the city
administrative services department as specified by standard payment requirements
established by the parking commission;
(4) All real property assessed by special improvement district (SID) No. 565, or other similarly
adopted improvement districts designed to provide additional parking spaces within the B-
3 district, will not be required to provide additional parking spaces beyond those required
at the time of the SID adoption, provided the use of the real property and improvements
remains unchanged from the initial assessments of SID No. 565, or other similarly adopted
improvement districts;
(a) In the event that a new use or an expansion is initiated on any portion of real
property or improvements are made subsequent to the assessments for SID No.
565 or other similarly adopted improvement districts, then parking space
requirements must be satisfied prior to initiation of those new or expanded
uses.
4. Bicycle parking required. All site development, exclusive of those qualifying for sketch plan review per
division 38.230 of this chapter, must provide bicycle parking facilities to accommodate bicycle-riding
residents and/or employees and customers of the proposed development. The number of bicycle
parking spaces must be at least ten percent of the number of automobile parking stalls required by
Tables 38.540.050-1 and 38.540.050-3 before the use of any special exception or modification, but
must in no case be less than two.
a. Required bicycle parking must be provided in a safe, accessible and convenient location.
Directional signage must be installed when bicycle parking facilities are not readily visible from
the street, sidewalk, or main building entrance. Installation of bicycle parking must allow for
adequate clearance for bicycles and their riders.
b. Bicycle parking may be provided in a common area to serve multiple buildings. The common area
must be within 100 feet of each served building.
c. Covered bicycle parking is encouraged.
d. Bicycle parking is permitted in required front or rear setbacks. Covered parking may be
integrated with required weather protection features. Alternate designs will be considered by the
review authority provided the alternate design meets or exceeds the intent of this standard
5. Bicycle parking standards. The intent of this sub section is to ensure required bicycle racks are designed
so bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience and will be reasonably
safeguarded from accidental damage.
a. Bicycle racks must hold bicycles securely, and meet the following criteria:
(1) Support the frame of the bicycle and not just one wheel.
(2) Allow the frame and one wheel to be locked to the rack when both wheels are left on the
bike.
(3) Allow the frame and both wheels to be locked to the rack if the front wheel is removed.
(4) Allow the use of either a cable or U-shaped lock.
49
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 30 of 32
(5) Be permanently anchored to an all season surface such as pavement, patio stones, or other
similar surface, and be located such that it will not become buried by snow removal
operations.
(6) Be usable by bikes with no kickstand.
(7) Be usable by bikes with water bottle cages.
(8) Be usable by a wide variety of sizes and types of bicycle.
b. Preferred bike rack styles are inverted U, coat hanger, or post and loop racks. Other styles which
meet the standards above are acceptable, including enclosed bicycle lockers. Comb and wave
style racks do not meet the required standard.
c. Bicycle parking location:
(1) Bicycle parking must be located within 50 feet on an entrance to the building the bicycle
parking is required to serve.
(2) Covered bicycle parking is recommended wherever possible.
(3) Bicycle parking may be provided within a building, but the location must be easily
accessible.
(4) Up to 50 percent or 12 spaces, whichever is less, of required bicycle parking may be located
in a required setback(s). Parking area may not interfere with any functional aspect of the
site including stormwater facilities, pedestrian circulation, landscaping requirements, etc.
(5) Bicycle parking may be located in required front setbacks, but may not occupy more than
one-quarter of the total area of a required front setback on an individual street frontage.
Departures will be considered (per section 38.250.060) for covered bicycle parking or
exceptional design.
(6) Screening with landscaping or other means of bicycle parking is not required.
(7) Bicycle parking is not permitted within a public street ROW unless prior written
authorization is granted by the city engineer for a perpetual encroachment easement.
(8) Bicycle racks and the area required for parking and maneuvering must meet the following
standards:
(a) Bicycle parking spaces must be at least six feet long and two feet wide, and in;
(b) Covered situations the overhead clearance must be at least seven feet.
(c) An aisle for bicycle maneuvering must be provided and maintained beside or
between each row of bicycle parking. This aisle must be at least five feet wide.
(d) Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another
bicycle.
(e) Areas set aside for bicycle parking must be clearly marked and reserved for
bicycle parking only.
6. B-2M district.
a. Minimum requirements. The number of spaces shown in Table 38.540.050-6 shall be provided
subject to the adjustments and exceptions allowed in this subsection.
b. Maximum parking. Provision of parking spaces in excess of the minimum number of spaces
required in Table 38.540.050-3 is not permitted.
50
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 31 of 32
Table 38.540.050-6
Use Minimum Parking Spaces Required Minimum Bicycle Parking Spaces
Required
Residential 1 per unit 1 per unit
Commercial 2 per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area
1 per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area
Restaurant 5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area
2.5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area
Hotels, Motels 0.8 per guest room 2 per 5,000 square feet of gross
floor area
Arts and/or Entertainment Center 5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area
2.5 per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area
Manufacturing 2 per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area
2 per 5,000 square feet of gross
floor area
c. Adjustments to minimum requirements. No reductions in required parking spaces may be taken
for any development within the B-2M zoning district, except pursuant to 38.540.060, Joint use of
parking facilities.
d. Requirements within the Midtown Urban Renewal District in the B-2M zoning district. The
minimum parking requirements of this section do not apply within the Midtown Urban Renewal
District the boundary of which is described in the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan adopted
pursuant to Ordinance 1925 and incorporated herein. All other requirements of this section,
including bicycle parking, maximum parking and standards when parking is provided, are
applicable.
e. Off-site parking. Any off-site parking used to meet the requirements of this chapter for
development in the B-2M zoning district must comply with 38.540.060, except that off-site
parking for multiple household dwellings may not be located more than 1,000 feet from any
commonly used entrance of the principle use served.
(Ord. No. 1997 , § 4, 3-19-2018; Ord. No. 2014 , §§ 13, 14, 6-3-2019; Ord. No. 2029 , § 10, 12-18-2019; Order No.
2020-02 , § 1, 11-17-2020)
Sec. 38.540.060. Joint use of parking facilities.
Up to 80 percent of the non-residential parking spaces required by this division 38.540 may be provided
through shared parking, subject to the requirements in subsections A and B of this section.
A. Shared parking may be requested if parking can be provided to serve two or more individual land uses
without conflict or encroachment. The review authority may make a determination for shared parking
arrangements based on a traffic survey or traffic impact study for the site based on the following:
1. At a minimum, a traffic survey or traffic impact study must examine for all potential uses: trip
generation, hours of operation, quantity of required parking spaces, quantity of spaces that will
be filled during peak hour periods, and any unusual events that may occur during the year that
will exceed the average parking requirement. The study must indicate that adequate parking
exists to meet the demand of potential uses served as well as meet technical requirements as
specified by the review authority.
51
Created: 2021-05-28 22:01:07 [EST]
(Supp. No. 10)
Page 32 of 32
2. The parties sharing parking spaces must enter into a long-term joint use agreement revocable
with review authority approval, running with the term of the designated uses.
B. Conditions required for joint use.
1. The building or use for which application is being made to utilize the off-street parking facilities
provided by another building or use must be located within 1,000 feet of such parking facilities as
measured by the route of travel from the nearest parking space to the commonly used entrance
of the principal use served;
2. The applicant must show that there is no substantial overlap in the operating hours of the two
buildings or uses for which joint use of off-street parking facilities is proposed; and
3. A properly drawn legal instrument, executed by the parties concerned for joint use of off-street
parking facilities, duly approved as to form and manner of execution by the city attorney, must
be filed with the city clerk and recorded with the county clerk and recorder.
52
From:Michael Veselik
To:Jim Ness; Mark Egge; Paul Neubauer; kelly pohl; Ryan Krueger; Deejay Newell
Cc:Brit Fontenot; Cyndy Andrus; Mike Maas; Greg Sullivan
Subject:FW: Public Records Rule for the Parking Subcommittees
Date:Monday, June 14, 2021 4:54:55 PM
Hello Parking Commission Members,
As we have discussed the public records questions regarding your subcommittee work, I asked the
city clerk and city attorney’s office to provide some more guidance and clarification to our
obligations to maintain public record. Please see their guidance below. You are welcome to contact
me with any further questions.
Mike
Mike Veselik
C: 406.946.2869
From: Greg Sullivan <gsullivan@BOZEMAN.NET>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:54 PM
To: Michael Veselik <mveselik@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Anna Saverud <ASaverud@BOZEMAN.NET>; Jennifer Giuttari <jgiuttari@BOZEMAN.NET>; Kelley
Rischke <KRischke@BOZEMAN.NET>; Mike Maas <MMaas@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: RE: Public Records Rule for the Parking Subcommittees
Hi Mike:
Throughout the years we have continually advised board members to refrain from meeting outside
of noticed public meetings to discuss matters of significant interest to the public. Obviously, a
conversation here and there between board members is fine – our concern is the broader picture of
public engagement, transparency, and fairness.
In February of 2020 I sent an email related to work of less than a quorum of a board. In that email I
was answering a question related to establishing a subcommittee. You’ll see I included a line
“Informal meetings of less than quorum of the full board to discuss formal board business should be
discouraged.” The email is pasted below. The same concept applies: when a subcommittee has been
appointed by the greater board their collaborative work should be done in public.
I can provide a legal opinion on where this stems from but that will take time and unless I’m asked
by the City Manager I’m not inclined to do so. The bottom line is the City will have a difficult time
establishing the line between when less than a quorum can meet for coffee to informally discuss
policy issues, interact on a project over google docs, or meet in a round robin type of setting to
discuss an issue. Given the liberal construction of Montana open meeting statutes in favor of
transparency, I reiterate my perspective: board members acting with n a formal subcommittee
should do the work of that subcommittee in the publicly noticed meeting.
53
Obviously, independent research by a board member on their own is not what I’m addressing.
Another important point: when board members use personal email for board business (or google
docs) those emails and documents (including drafts) are subject to the right to know. Just a good
reminder.
g
Here’s the email:
“We have always taken the position based on case law that creation of a subcommittee (regardless
of whether the subcommittee constitutes a quorum of the full board) to do formal board work
requires:
· A formal decision of the board to create the committee (this can be memorialized through
the minutes);
· Noticing of the meetings of the subcommittee (on the board at city hall and every other
location the greater board notices meetings);
· The meetings must be run as a public meeting; as such:
o An agenda must be published;
o Minutes must be taken; and
o An opportunity for public comment must be provided.
We have always indicated a meeting at someone’s house or a bar etc. is not permitted.
Informal meetings of less than a quorum of the full board to discuss formal board business should be
discouraged.
Hand written minutes are ok unless there’s a specific rule in the bylaws that indicates minutes must
be recorded. That being said, I suggest recording meetings of a subcommittee if the greater board
does so. This can be done with a hand recorder and saving the recording pursuant to the records
retention schedule.
Hope this helps.
g”
From: Mike Maas <MMaas@BOZEMAN.NET>
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 8:30 AM
To: Michael Veselik <mveselik@BOZEMAN.NET>; Greg Sullivan <gsullivan@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: RE: Public Records Rule for the Parking Subcommittees
Good morning,
54
My recommendation is to not have mutual communication via Google doc outside of a public
meeting. Concurrent electronic communications create a problem for not allowing public
participation or right to know. If they would like to provide documents for review and discussion,
those documents, or at least their citation and how to find them, should be provided within the
agenda. Discussion on the topic should be confined to the publicly noticed and publicly open
meeting.
Our policy with subcommittees is to treat them the same as the body-whole and therefore any
requirements of the Parking Commission would also follow with their subcommittee. If
Commissioner Egge would like to create a discussion on a particular issue, make that discussion and
the ability to comment open to the public for them to participate in the Google Doc, that creates a
records management issue. We must assure that we maintain version control of that document and
that it is preserved according to records schedules.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Maas, MPA| City Clerk
City of Bozeman | 121 N. Rouse Ave. | Bozeman, MT 59715
D: 406.582.2321 | C: 406.599.0804
Pronouns: he/him/his
www.bozeman.net
From: Michael Veselik <mveselik@BOZEMAN.NET>
Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 11:52 AM
To: Greg Sullivan <gsullivan@BOZEMAN.NET>; Mike Maas <MMaas@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Public Records Rule for the Parking Subcommittees
Greg and Mike,
Today, we had our first meeting of the Policy Subcommittee of the Parking Commission. We had a
good, productive meeting and with Mike’s help, honored our obligation to allow the public to
participate and have the right to know.
At the meeting, Commissioner Egge raised a question about whether the subcommittee could
collaborate on policy topics between meetings. He was interested in sharing papers/documents with
one another and using a google doc to comment back and forth. I advised that I did not see an
immediate red flag, but that I would touch base with you both to ensure we are protecting the
public’s right to know. I suggested that they would need to include any work product or materials
that they worked on in the agenda packets for meetings so the public could see the work they were
doing. Do you both have any further guidance?
Best,
55
Mike
Mike Veselik | City of Bozeman Economic Development | he/him/his
C: 406.946.2869 |mveselik@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
56
From:Mike Maas
To:Mark Egge; ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com; prneubauer@gmail.com
Cc:jim.ness@ourbank.com; Jeff Mihelich; Michael Veselik; Brit Fontenot; Greg Sullivan; Jesse DiTommaso
Subject:RE: Parking Minimums Resolution
Date:Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:14:00 PM
Attachments:FW Public Records Rule for the Parking Subcommittees .msg
Good afternoon,
It has come to my attention that members of the Parking Policy Subcommittee have engaged in
synchronous and/or concurrent email discussions related to documents shared in furtherance of the
work forming the below recommendations on parking minimums. As per the June 14 email (see
attached), we are obligated to preserve the public’s Right to Know and Right to Participate as
outlined in the Montana State Constitution. In an effort to preserve those rights, the Clerk’s Office
will need to have all of the referenced documents and the email discussions related to them to
provide in the packet materials to the full Parking Commission before the Resolution can be
discussed. The deadline for submission of the packet materials for next week’s meeting is Friday at
noon.
Thank you,
Mike Maas, MPA| City Clerk
City of Bozeman | 121 N. Rouse Ave. | Bozeman, MT 59715
D: 406.582.2321 | C: 406.599.0804
Pronouns: he/him/his
www.bozeman.net
From: Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 11:32 PM
To: Michael Veselik <mveselik@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com>; Paul Neubauer <prneubauer@gmail.com>; Brit
Fontenot <bfontenot@BOZEMAN.NET>; Greg Sullivan <gsullivan@BOZEMAN.NET>; Mike Maas
<MMaas@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Re: Parking Minimums Resolution
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mike,
Here is the language from our meeting this morning:
Having reviewed the currently adopted City of Bozeman plans, current
practices among peer cities and policy leaders, and evaluated the impacts
proposed changes with respect to recent and pending City of Bozeman
57
projects, the Policy Subcommittee recommends simplification and ageneral reduction of our parking requirements as follows:
A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned space
A maximum of three surface parking spaces per 1000 SF of
conditioned space Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking space
(e.g. 1400 SF = 1 parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parking spaces), to
the nearest square foot and with halves rounded up
For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial andresidential uses shall be calculated separately, with a reduction of up
to 50% of the lesser of the two requirements allowed
Affordable housing developments, developments within one half mile
of high frequency transit stops, and redevelopments of less than 5000SF are exempted from required minimums
No additional credits or reductions are given or allowed except for a
residential allowance of one parking space per 24 linear feet of
parkable curb frontage (or alternative parking arrangement approvedby the City)
Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments, are
available through a Planned Unit Development, subject to City
Commission review and approvalDefinitions:
Conditioned space: insulated, heated or cooled space, to include livable
and leasable space, exclusive of garages, storage areas, and other spaces
not intended for habitation or commercial useAffordable housing: as defined in Sec. 38.700.020.
High frequency transit: transit service meeting currently defined standards
of “transit availability” and having headways of 20 minutes or less
(acknowledging that Bozeman currently does not currently have anyservice that would meet this standard)
Relevant plans: the Bozeman City Commission Strategic Plan, the 2016
Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan, the 2020 BozemanCommunity Plan, the 2020 Bozeman Climate Plan, the 2020 Bozeman
Community Housing Action Plan; and, 2019 Downtown Bozeman
Improvement Plan,
Mark On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 3:46 PM Michael Veselik <mveselik@bozeman.net> wrote:
Mark, Ryan, and Paul,
Thanks for a good meeting this morning! It was a productive step in the right direction.
Mark, can you send along the language you all would like included in the therefore part ofthe resolution? I will add it in and get a draft out to you all in addition.
58
Also, during the meeting today, it was mentioned several times that emails were exchangedand documents discussed among board members outside of the meeting. Under Montana
Right To Know Laws, this is not allowed. Upon creation of the subcommittees, the quorumswere established at two members. Therefore, any time you email to discuss policy, it is a
violation of public records laws. Information can be shared such as an article, butsubstantive policy discussions must occur only in a public setting. The City Attorney’s
office and the Clerk’s office were clear about our requirement to fulfill our obligationsunder the public’s right to know. They are cc’d here if you have any questions or take issue
with their interpretation of open meetings laws in the State of Montana.
If the subcommittee cannot meet those obligations, we will discontinue subcommitteemeetings and return all conversations to the full Parking Commission. As always, you are
welcome to call me with any questions you have.
Mike
Mike Veselik | City of Bozeman Economic Development | he/him/his
C: 406.946.2869 |mveselik@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution
(Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana
Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available
for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails
that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be
protected from disclosure under law.
--Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
59
From:Mike Maas
To:Mark Egge; Michael Veselik
Cc:Ryan Krueger; Paul Neubauer; Brit Fontenot; Greg Sullivan; Jeff Mihelich; jim.ness@ourbank.com; Jesse
DiTommaso
Subject:RE: Parking Minimums Resolution
Date:Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:25:00 PM
Mark,
In your attachment of emails between you and Paul there are substantive discussions related to a
policy. In the emails provided by Ryan, you and he scheduled a time to meet to have a substantive
policy discussion. As the subcommittee is only three members, communications between any two of
you constitutes a quorum of the subcommittee. This would not be the case if you were to get
together with the a member of the Parking Commission not assigned to the subcommittee. In the
email thread from June 14, my comments to Mike Veselik include that “[o]ur policy with
subcommittees is to treat them the same as the body-whole and therefore any requirements of the
Parking Commission would also follow with their subcommittee.” Adhering to noticing of a quorum
is one of these requirements, as it constitutes a public meeting.
Thank you,
Mike Maas, MPA| City Clerk
City of Bozeman | 121 N. Rouse Ave. | Bozeman, MT 59715
D: 406.582.2321 | C: 406.599.0804
Pronouns: he/him/his
www.bozeman.net
From: Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:52 PM
To: Michael Veselik <mveselik@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com>; Paul Neubauer <prneubauer@gmail.com>; Brit
Fontenot <bfontenot@BOZEMAN.NET>; Greg Sullivan <gsullivan@BOZEMAN.NET>; Mike Maas
<MMaas@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Re: Parking Minimums Resolution
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mike,
I'm not sure that I entirely follow this request. To be clear, there has been
no communication amongst the subcommittee except at our publicly
noticed meetings.
Greg Sullivan's 6/14 email "re: Public Records Rule for the Parking
60
Subcommittees" states that, "obviously, a conversation here and therebetween board members is fine – our concern is the broader picture of
public engagement, transparency, and fairness." I've interpreted this to
mean that a conversation here and there between board members is fine.
Are you saying that I cannot communicate with Paul or Ryan individuallyexcept in a publicly noticed policy subcommittee meeting?
If it's helpful, I've attached PDFs of the two one-on-one emails referenced
during yesterday's meeting.
Mark On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 11:31 PM Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com> wrote:
Mike,
Here is the language from our meeting this morning:
Having reviewed the currently adopted City of Bozeman plans, current
practices among peer cities and policy leaders, and evaluated the
impacts proposed changes with respect to recent and pending City of
Bozeman projects, the Policy Subcommittee recommends simplificationand a general reduction of our parking requirements as follows:
A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned space
A maximum of three surface parking spaces per 1000 SF of
conditioned space Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking
space (e.g. 1400 SF = 1 parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parking
spaces), to the nearest square foot and with halves rounded up
For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial andresidential uses shall be calculated separately, with a reduction of
up to 50% of the lesser of the two requirements allowed
Affordable housing developments, developments within one half
mile of high frequency transit stops, and redevelopments of lessthan 5000 SF are exempted from required minimums
No additional credits or reductions are given or allowed except for a
residential allowance of one parking space per 24 linear feet of
parkable curb frontage (or alternative parking arrangementapproved by the City)
Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments, are
available through a Planned Unit Development, subject to City
Commission review and approvalDefinitions:
Conditioned space: insulated, heated or cooled space, to include livable
and leasable space, exclusive of garages, storage areas, and other
spaces not intended for habitation or commercial useAffordable housing: as defined in Sec. 38.700.020.
High frequency transit: transit service meeting currently defined
61
standards of “transit availability” and having headways of 20 minutes or
less (acknowledging that Bozeman currently does not currently have anyservice that would meet this standard)
Relevant plans: the Bozeman City Commission Strategic Plan, the 2016
Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan, the 2020 BozemanCommunity Plan, the 2020 Bozeman Climate Plan, the 2020 Bozeman
Community Housing Action Plan; and, 2019 Downtown Bozeman
Improvement Plan,
Mark On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 3:46 PM Michael Veselik <mveselik@bozeman.net> wrote:
Mark, Ryan, and Paul,
Thanks for a good meeting this morning! It was a productive step in the right direction.Mark, can you send along the language you all would like included in the therefore part
of the resolution? I will add it in and get a draft out to you all in addition.
Also, during the meeting today, it was mentioned several times that emails wereexchanged and documents discussed among board members outside of the meeting.
Under Montana Right To Know Laws, this is not allowed. Upon creation of thesubcommittees, the quorums were established at two members. Therefore, any time you
email to discuss policy, it is a violation of public records laws. Information can be sharedsuch as an article, but substantive policy discussions must occur only in a public setting.
The City Attorney’s office and the Clerk’s office were clear about our requirement tofulfill our obligations under the public’s right to know. They are cc’d here if you have any
questions or take issue with their interpretation of open meetings laws in the State ofMontana.
If the subcommittee cannot meet those obligations, we will discontinue subcommittee
meetings and return all conversations to the full Parking Commission. As always, you arewelcome to call me with any questions you have.
Mike
Mike Veselik | City of Bozeman Economic Development | he/him/his
C: 406.946.2869 |mveselik@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution
(Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana
Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available
for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails
that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be
protected from disclosure under law.
62
--
Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
--Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
63
From:Ryan Krueger
To:Mike Maas
Subject:Fwd: parking #s
Date:Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:18:32 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Email 1 of 2
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com>Date: Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: parking #sTo: Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
Hi Mark,
Got the invite. Just a heads up, I only have about 30 min to chat today but we can make themost of that short window. Thanks, talk to you soon.
- Ryan
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:43 AM Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com> wrote:
Ryan, that sounds good. Just sent an invite. Thanks! -m
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:53 AM Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com> wrote:Apologies, I had a meeting get scheduled at 1 pm. How does 12 pm MT work?
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 7:42 AM Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com> wrote:Let's do Friday, how's 1 pm MT?
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:50 PM Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com> wrote:Ryan, thanks! I'm free Thursday after 1 pm MT and Friday after 10
am MT. -Mark
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 5:33 PM Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Mark,
I’m in Oregon on vacation but could do a quick talk on Thursday or Friday. Sendme a few times that work for you and I’ll see what works for me.
Thanks,Ryan
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com> wrote:Hey, Ryan.
If you have some time, could we touch base at some point in the
64
next few days to talk through some numbers for parkingprojects? I attempted to "prove out" the idea of a lot coverage
maximums with a few practical examples and basically found
that the idea is untenable. That said, reasonable maximums
might accomplish the same purpose. I'd love to be able to run afew examples by you. I'd be happy to meet up for coffee/beer
(with laptops) tomorrow or Wednesday, or via zoom Thursday or
Friday.
Thanks!
Mark
-- Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
-- Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
--
Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
65
From:Ryan Krueger
To:Mike Maas
Subject:Fwd: parking bullet points
Date:Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:19:37 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Email 2 of 2
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>Date: Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:25 PM
Subject: parking bullet pointsTo: Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com>
A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned space A maximum of three parking spaces per 1000 SF of conditioned space
Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking space
(e.g. 1400 SF = 1 parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parking spaces),
rounded to the nearest square foot. Perfect halves will be roundeddown.
For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial and
residential uses shall be calculated separately and total required
parking reduced by 50% of the lesser of the two.
"Affordable" housing developments, developments within 1/2 mile of
high frequency transit, and redevelopments of less than 5000 SF are
exempted from required minimums
Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments, areavailable through a Planned Unit Development, subject to City
Commission review and approval.
-- Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
66
From:Mark Egge
To:Mike Maas
Cc:Michael Veselik; Ryan Krueger; Paul Neubauer; Brit Fontenot; Greg Sullivan; Jeff Mihelich;
jim.ness@ourbank.com; Jesse DiTommaso
Subject:Re: Parking Minimums Resolution
Date:Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:43:43 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mike,
Got it. I'll be sure that any future substantive policy discussions with other
members of the Policy Subcommittee (including one on one discussions)
are limited to only publicly noticed meetings. Thanks for the guidance andhelping my adherence.
Mark
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:25 PM Mike Maas <MMaas@bozeman.net> wrote:
Mark,
In your attachment of emails between you and Paul there are substantive discussions related to a
policy. In the emails provided by Ryan, you and he scheduled a time to meet to have a substantive
policy discussion. As the subcommittee is only three members, communications between any two
of you constitutes a quorum of the subcommittee. This would not be the case if you were to get
together with the a member of the Parking Commission not assigned to the subcommittee. In the
email thread from June 14, my comments to Mike Veselik include that “[o]ur policy with
subcommittees is to treat them the same as the body-whole and therefore any requirements of
the Parking Commission would also follow with their subcommittee.” Adhering to noticing of a
quorum is one of these requirements, as it constitutes a public meeting.
Thank you,
Mike Maas, MPA| City Clerk
City of Bozeman | 121 N. Rouse Ave. | Bozeman, MT 59715
D: 406.582.2321 | C: 406.599.0804
Pronouns: he/him/his
67
www.bozeman.net
From: Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:52 PM
To: Michael Veselik <mveselik@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com>; Paul Neubauer <prneubauer@gmail.com>; Brit
Fontenot <bfontenot@BOZEMAN.NET>; Greg Sullivan <gsullivan@BOZEMAN.NET>; Mike Maas
<MMaas@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Re: Parking Minimums Resolution
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mike,
I'm not sure that I entirely follow this request. To be clear, there has
been no communication amongst the subcommittee except at our
publicly noticed meetings.
Greg Sullivan's 6/14 email "re: Public Records Rule for the Parking
Subcommittees" states that, "obviously, a conversation here and there
between board members is fine – our concern is the broader picture of public engagement, transparency, and fairness." I've interpreted this to
mean that a conversation here and there between board members is
fine. Are you saying that I cannot communicate with Paul or Ryan
individually except in a publicly noticed policy subcommittee meeting?
If it's helpful, I've attached PDFs of the two one-on-one emails
referenced during yesterday's meeting.
Mark
68
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 11:31 PM Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com> wrote:
Mike,
Here is the language from our meeting this morning:
Having reviewed the currently adopted City of Bozeman plans, current
practices among peer cities and policy leaders, and evaluated theimpacts proposed changes with respect to recent and pending City ofBozeman projects, the Policy Subcommittee recommends simplification
and a general reduction of our parking requirements as follows:
A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned
space A maximum of three surface parking spaces per 1000 SF of
conditioned space
Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking
space (e.g. 1400 SF = 1 parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parkingspaces), to the nearest square foot and with halves rounded up
For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial and
residential uses shall be calculated separately, with a reduction of
up to 50% of the lesser of the two requirements allowedAffordable housing developments, developments within one half
mile of high frequency transit stops, and redevelopments of less
than 5000 SF are exempted from required minimums
No additional credits or reductions are given or allowed except fora residential allowance of one parking space per 24 linear feet of
parkable curb frontage (or alternative parking arrangement
approved by the City)
Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments,are available through a Planned Unit Development, subject to City
Commission review and approval
Definitions:
Conditioned space: insulated, heated or cooled space, to include livableand leasable space, exclusive of garages, storage areas, and other
spaces not intended for habitation or commercial use
Affordable housing: as defined in Sec. 38.700.020.
High frequency transit: transit service meeting currently definedstandards of “transit availability” and having headways of 20 minutes
or less (acknowledging that Bozeman currently does not currently have
any service that would meet this standard)
69
Relevant plans: the Bozeman City Commission Strategic Plan, the 2016
Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan, the 2020 Bozeman
Community Plan, the 2020 Bozeman Climate Plan, the 2020 BozemanCommunity Housing Action Plan; and, 2019 Downtown Bozeman
Improvement Plan,
Mark
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 3:46 PM Michael Veselik <mveselik@bozeman.net> wrote:
Mark, Ryan, and Paul,
Thanks for a good meeting this morning! It was a productive step in the right direction.
Mark, can you send along the language you all would like included in the therefore partof the resolution? I will add it in and get a draft out to you all in addition.
Also, during the meeting today, it was mentioned several times that emails were
exchanged and documents discussed among board members outside of the meeting.Under Montana Right To Know Laws, this is not allowed. Upon creation of the
subcommittees, the quorums were established at two members. Therefore, any time youemail to discuss policy, it is a violation of public records laws. Information can be
shared such as an article, but substantive policy discussions must occur only in apublic setting. The City Attorney’s office and the Clerk’s office were clear about our
requirement to fulfill our obligations under the public’s right to know. They are cc’dhere if you have any questions or take issue with their interpretation of open meetings
laws in the State of Montana.
If the subcommittee cannot meet those obligations, we will discontinue subcommitteemeetings and return all conversations to the full Parking Commission. As always, you
are welcome to call me with any questions you have.
Mike
Mike Veselik | City of Bozeman Economic Development | he/him/his
70
C: 406.946.2869 |mveselik@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution
(Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6,
Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may
be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention
policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual
privacy may be protected from disclosure under law.
--
Mark Egge
(406) 548-4488
he / him / his
--
Mark Egge
(406) 548-4488
he / him / his
City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art.
II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code
Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for
public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that
contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be
protected from disclosure under law.
--
Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
71
8/4/21, 12:22 PMMark Egge Mail - parking bullet points
Page 1 of 1https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=fef3c5c023&view=pt&search=…ad-a%3Ar-821905666108904822&simpl=msg-a%3Ar5581469616040637512
Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
parking bullet points
1 message
Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:25 PM
To: Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com>
A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned space
A maximum of three parking spaces per 1000 SF of conditioned space
Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking space (e.g.
1400 SF = 1 parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parking spaces), rounded to the
nearest square foot. Perfect halves will be rounded down.
For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial and residential
uses shall be calculated separately and total required parking reduced by 50%
of the lesser of the two.
"Affordable" housing developments, developments within 1/2 mile of high
frequency transit, and redevelopments of less than 5000 SF are exempted
from required minimums
Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments, are available
through a Planned Unit Development, subject to City Commission review and
approval.
--
Mark Egge
(406) 548-4488
he / him / his
72
8/4/21, 12:22 PMMark Egge Mail - parking reg discussion
Page 1 of 3https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=fef3c5c023&view=pt&search=…sg-f%3A1707038230381659439&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-9199960522745198256
Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
parking reg discussion
3 messages
Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:11 PM
To: Paul Neubauer <prneubauer@gmail.com>
Paul,
For our discussion tomorrow morning, this is a bulleted list of what I'm suggesting we advance to the
Parking Commission as a resolution for city commission:
• A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned space
• A maximum of three parking spaces per 1000 SF of conditioned space
• Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking space (e.g. 1400 SF = 1 parking
space; 1600 SF = 2 parking spaces), rounded to the nearest square foot (halves rounded up)
• For mixed use developments, requirements for commercial and residential uses shall be calculated
separately and total required parking reduced by 50% of the lesser of the two
• "Affordable" housing developments, developments within 1/2 mile of high frequency transit, and
redevelopments of less than 5000 SF are exempted from required minimums
• Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments, are available through a Planned Unit
Development, subject to City Commission review and approval.
--
Mark Egge
(406) 548-4488
he / him / his
Paul Neubauer <prneubauer@gmail.com>Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:41 PM
To: Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
Thanks for the heads up, and the nice package to consider.
My questions would be / are:
Do those first two bullet points refer to both residential and commercial? The SF seems high for commercial.
I also don't like the maximums. Developers aren't gonna build any more than they think they need, or the
circumstances require.
And your mixed use bullet...that's new, right? At one point we talked about using the greater of the two. What your
proposing is generating the minimum requirement for each use, reducing the smaller by 50%, and then adding them
BOTH together for a total minimum requirement...is that right?
If I have that right, I think I can get on board with that...assuming that this goes under the paradigm of ZERO additional
credits / reductions. This seems to me to be another potential way of nipping 565 in the bud...
The bigger hurdle for me would be the first two points I raised...
73
8/4/21, 12:22 PMMark Egge Mail - parking reg discussion
Page 2 of 3https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=fef3c5c023&view=pt&search=…sg-f%3A1707038230381659439&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-9199960522745198256
As always...I'll look forward to hearing more details.
PN
[Quoted text hidden]
Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:57 PM
To: Paul Neubauer <prneubauer@gmail.com>
Paul—
A couple quick comments in advance of our discussion in the morning (in somewhat random order):
And your mixed use bullet...that's new, right? At one point we talked about using the greater of the
two. What your proposing is generating the minimum requirement for each use, reducing the smaller
by 50%, and then adding them BOTH together for a total minimum requirement...is that right?
This is changed from some of our prior discussions, but consistent from our two previous meetings. We
had previously discussed a 1:1 reduction awhile back, but we dialed things back to a 50% reduction of
the lesser of the two uses (then adding both together).
Do those first two bullet points refer to both residential and commercial? The SF seems high for
commercial.
Yes—that's my suggestion. We had previously discussed an "open option" approach for commercial
districts, and then different standards for mixed use districts. Given the experience of Buffalo et al.
who have eliminated parking requirements entirely only to see commercial developers continue to build
similar quantities of parking, I didn't see the point in separating out commercial districts.
I also don't like the maximums. Developers aren't gonna build any more than they think they need, or
the circumstances require.
If we simplify our minimums, we should probably simplify the maximums as well (e.g current
maximums for golf courses specify no more than 1 space per 250 square feet of main building floor
area; plus 1 space for every 2.5 practice tees in driving range; plus 5 spaces per each green in the
playing area).
For retail developments, our existing maximums are 3.33 spaces per 1000 in B-2M districts and 4.16
spaces per 1000 in other commercial districts. These maximums do have a binding effect: when I
discussed the subject with Marty, he mentioned several developments which were limited by our
maximums (e.g. Walgreens was interested in coming to town, but ultimately decided not to because of
our parking maximums; Costco is doing a PUD in order to circumvent our maximums).
The suggested 3 per 1000 SF maximum is based on spending a good portion of last weekend mapping
out lot coverages of existing sites (Walmart, Kmart, Target, etc.). For example, I calculated the ratios
for the Cannery District (which I consider to be a "best case" scenario in terms of developments with
lots of parking) and Walmart (which I consider to be a "worst case" scenario in terms of parking). The
Cannery District provides roughly 2 spaces per 1000 SF. Walmart provides 4 spaces per 1000 SF. 3.0
seems like a reasonable middle-ground—that is, not holding every development to the same high
standards as the Cannery, but also not permitting (by right) the low standards of Walmart.
It happens that the B-2M parking maximums are 3.33 per 1000 SF, so 3 per 1000 is only a 10%
reduction. And, what I'm proposing is actually more liberal: by only limiting surface parking (but
placing no limit on structured, underground, or tuck-under parking), we place no limit on how many
74
8/4/21, 12:22 PMMark Egge Mail - parking reg discussion
Page 3 of 3https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=fef3c5c023&view=pt&search=…sg-f%3A1707038230381659439&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-9199960522745198256
parking spaces Costco or others could build; only a limit on how much sprawl they may create in the
process.
Finally, the PUD option is always open—and I consider a fair bargain. If a development wants to do an
exemplary job in other regards in exchange for building a gazillion parking spaces, so be it.
Okay, I've written too much. Looking forward to discussing tomorrow!
Mark
[Quoted text hidden]
75
From:Paul Neubauer
To:Mark Egge
Cc:Mike Maas; Michael Veselik; Ryan Krueger; Brit Fontenot; Greg Sullivan; Jeff Mihelich; jim.ness@ourbank.com;
Jesse DiTommaso
Subject:Re: Parking Minimums Resolution
Date:Wednesday, August 4, 2021 5:47:40 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
The only interaction I had with either Mark or Ryan was the email that Mark has forwarded toyou already.
Sorry for our oversight.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:42 PM Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com> wrote:
Mike,
Got it. I'll be sure that any future substantive policy discussions with
other members of the Policy Subcommittee (including one on one
discussions) are limited to only publicly noticed meetings. Thanks for theguidance and helping my adherence.
Mark
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:25 PM Mike Maas <MMaas@bozeman.net> wrote:
Mark,
In your attachment of emails between you and Paul there are substantive discussions related to
a policy. In the emails provided by Ryan, you and he scheduled a time to meet to have a
substantive policy discussion. As the subcommittee is only three members, communications
between any two of you constitutes a quorum of the subcommittee. This would not be the case
if you were to get together with the a member of the Parking Commission not assigned to the
subcommittee. In the email thread from June 14, my comments to Mike Veselik include that
“[o]ur policy with subcommittees is to treat them the same as the body-whole and therefore
any requirements of the Parking Commission would also follow with their subcommittee.”
Adhering to noticing of a quorum is one of these requirements, as it constitutes a public
meeting.
Thank you,
Mike Maas, MPA| City Clerk
76
City of Bozeman | 121 N. Rouse Ave. | Bozeman, MT 59715
D: 406.582.2321 | C: 406.599.0804
Pronouns: he/him/his
www.bozeman.net
From: Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:52 PM
To: Michael Veselik <mveselik@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Ryan Krueger <ryan.c.krueger@gmail.com>; Paul Neubauer <prneubauer@gmail.com>; Brit
Fontenot <bfontenot@BOZEMAN.NET>; Greg Sullivan <gsullivan@BOZEMAN.NET>; Mike Maas
<MMaas@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Re: Parking Minimums Resolution
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mike,
I'm not sure that I entirely follow this request. To be clear, there hasbeen no communication amongst the subcommittee except at ourpublicly noticed meetings.
Greg Sullivan's 6/14 email "re: Public Records Rule for the ParkingSubcommittees" states that, "obviously, a conversation here and there
between board members is fine – our concern is the broader picture of
public engagement, transparency, and fairness." I've interpreted this
to mean that a conversation here and there between board members isfine. Are you saying that I cannot communicate with Paul or Ryan
individually except in a publicly noticed policy subcommittee meeting?
77
If it's helpful, I've attached PDFs of the two one-on-one emails
referenced during yesterday's meeting.
Mark
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 11:31 PM Mark Egge <mark@eateggs.com> wrote:
Mike,
Here is the language from our meeting this morning:
Having reviewed the currently adopted City of Bozeman plans,current practices among peer cities and policy leaders, and evaluated
the impacts proposed changes with respect to recent and pending
City of Bozeman projects, the Policy Subcommittee recommends
simplification and a general reduction of our parking requirements asfollows:
A minimum of one parking space per 1000 SF of conditioned
space
A maximum of three surface parking spaces per 1000 SF ofconditioned space
Required parking shall be rounded to the nearest whole parking
space (e.g. 1400 SF = 1 parking space; 1600 SF = 2 parking
spaces), to the nearest square foot and with halves rounded upFor mixed use developments, requirements for commercial and
residential uses shall be calculated separately, with a reduction
of up to 50% of the lesser of the two requirements allowed
Affordable housing developments, developments within one halfmile of high frequency transit stops, and redevelopments of less
than 5000 SF are exempted from required minimums
No additional credits or reductions are given or allowed except
for a residential allowance of one parking space per 24 linearfeet of parkable curb frontage (or alternative parking
arrangement approved by the City)
Exceptions to these requirements, for qualifying developments,
are available through a Planned Unit Development, subject toCity Commission review and approval
Definitions:
Conditioned space: insulated, heated or cooled space, to include
78
livable and leasable space, exclusive of garages, storage areas, andother spaces not intended for habitation or commercial use
Affordable housing: as defined in Sec. 38.700.020.
High frequency transit: transit service meeting currently defined
standards of “transit availability” and having headways of 20 minutesor less (acknowledging that Bozeman currently does not currently
have any service that would meet this standard)
Relevant plans: the Bozeman City Commission Strategic Plan, the
2016 Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan, the 2020
Bozeman Community Plan, the 2020 Bozeman Climate Plan, the 2020
Bozeman Community Housing Action Plan; and, 2019 DowntownBozeman Improvement Plan,
Mark
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 3:46 PM Michael Veselik <mveselik@bozeman.net> wrote:
Mark, Ryan, and Paul,
Thanks for a good meeting this morning! It was a productive step in the rightdirection. Mark, can you send along the language you all would like included in thetherefore part of the resolution? I will add it in and get a draft out to you all inaddition.
Also, during the meeting today, it was mentioned several times that emails wereexchanged and documents discussed among board members outside of the meeting.Under Montana Right To Know Laws, this is not allowed. Upon creation of thesubcommittees, the quorums were established at two members. Therefore, any timeyou email to discuss policy, it is a violation of public records laws. Information canbe shared such as an article, but substantive policy discussions must occur only in apublic setting. The City Attorney’s office and the Clerk’s office were clear about ourrequirement to fulfill our obligations under the public’s right to know. They are cc’dhere if you have any questions or take issue with their interpretation of open meetingslaws in the State of Montana.
If the subcommittee cannot meet those obligations, we will discontinue subcommitteemeetings and return all conversations to the full Parking Commission. As always, youare welcome to call me with any questions you have.
79
Mike
Mike Veselik | City of Bozeman Economic Development | he/him/his
C: 406.946.2869 |mveselik@bozeman.net | www.bozeman.net
City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s
Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2,
Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the
contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s
record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information
related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law.
--
Mark Egge
(406) 548-4488
he / him / his
--
Mark Egge
(406) 548-4488
he / him / his
City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution
(Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana
Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available
for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails
that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be
protected from disclosure under law.
80
-- Mark Egge(406) 548-4488he / him / his
81
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Parking Commission
FROM:Vesel
SUBJECT:Capacity Subcommittee of the Bozeman Parking Commission Report
MEETING DATE:August 12, 2021
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Policy Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:Discussion
STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and
maintenance for existing and new infrastructure.
BACKGROUND:The Capacity Subcommittee will lead a discussion of their recent work
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:No
ALTERNATIVES:None
FISCAL EFFECTS:None
Report compiled on: August 5, 2021
82
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Parking Commission
FROM:Veselik
SUBJECT:Parking Manager Report
MEETING DATE:August 12, 2021
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Policy Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:Discussion
STRATEGIC PLAN:7.3 Best Practices, Creativity & Foresight: Utilize best practices, innovative
approaches, and constantly anticipate new directions and changes relevant
to the governance of the City. Be also adaptable and flexible with an
outward focus on the customer and an external understanding of the issues
as others may see them.
BACKGROUND:The Parking Manager will provide an update to the Parking Commission.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:No Unresolved Issues
ALTERNATIVES:No Alterna
FISCAL EFFECTS:No Fiscal Effects
Attachments:
August 2021 Parking Expenditure.xlsx
August 2021 Parking Manager Report.docx
Monthly Passport Revenue Report.xlsx
Rolling Garage Occupancy Data August 2021.xlsx
Report compiled on: August 5, 2021
83
THROUGH PERIOD 1
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
%
EARNED
YTD
%
EXPECTE
D YTD
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
GARAGE PERMITS 400,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 50,000.00$ $9,693.71 19%8%
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ $2,586.00 43%8%
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 28,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 6,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ $0.00 0%8%
MISC REVENUE 1,500.00$ $145.66 10%8%
TOTAL 993,500.00$ 12,425.37$ 1%8%
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
% SPENT
YTD
%
EXPECTE
D YTD
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 193,113.00$ 8,269.90$ 4%8%
ADMIN - OPERATING 258,605.00$ 1,938.36$ 1%8%
ADMIN - CAPITAL 40,000.00$ -$ 0%8%
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 254,792.00$ 21,456.03$ 8%8%
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 60,038.00$ 787.21$ 1%8%
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 75,000.00$ -$ 0%8%
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 87.98$ 0%8%
GARAGE - OPERATING 302,502.00$ 23,263.78$ 8%8%
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ -$ 0%8%
TOTAL 1,234,164.00$55,803.26$ 5%8%
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 08/05/2021
84
THROUGH PERIOD 12
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ $48,559.04
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ $481,017.51
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ $59,102.15
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ $5,786.00
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ $36,322.50
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ $4,282.50
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ $14,505.00
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ $46,204.19
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ $2,225.00
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ $264,312.70
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ $4,780.13
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ $18,901.42
TOTAL 971,840.00$ 985,998.14$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 107,631.42$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 177,657.46$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,631.25$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 235,162.76$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 39,580.54$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 85,291.95$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 188,812.16$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 13,425.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 865,589.66$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 06/30/2021
85
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
97%100%
137%100%
78%100%
96%100%
107%100%
214%100%
97%100%
154%100%
111%100%
66%100%
96%100%
808%100%
101%100%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
77%100%
91%100%
5%100%
91%100%
66%100%
30%100%
33%100%
90%100%
0%100%
70%100%
86
THROUGH PERIOD 12
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ $48,559.04
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ $481,017.51
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ $54,247.26
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ $5,786.00
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ $36,322.50
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ $4,282.50
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ $14,505.00
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ $31,819.66
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ $2,225.00
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ $264,312.70
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ $4,780.13
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ $18,901.42
TOTAL 971,840.00$ 966,758.72$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 99,370.96$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 177,432.54$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,631.25$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 213,640.74$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 27,226.45$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 85,291.95$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 158,517.26$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ (83,664.38)$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 695,843.89$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 06/07/2021
87
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
97%100%Basic Act 32 322.50-00
137%100%Basic Act 32 322.50-10
72%100%Basic Act 32 322.50-20
96%100%Basic Act 32 322.50-30
107%100%Basic Act 32 322.55-00
214%100%Basic Act 32 322.60-00
97%100%Basic Act 32 322.65-00
106%100%Basic Act 34 341.76-10 and 341.77-10
111%100%Basic Act 34 341.78-00
66%100%Basic Act 35
96%100%Basic Act 36
808%100%Basic Act 38
99%100%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
71%100%
91%100%
5%100%
82%100%
46%100%
0%100%
33%100%
76%100%
0%100%
57%100%
88
THROUGH PERIOD 9
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ $45,864.04
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ $440,885.12
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ $48,336.78
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ $5,282.00
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ $35,112.50
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ $4,087.50
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ $14,235.00
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ $23,969.69
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ $2,075.00
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ $206,624.20
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ $4,780.13
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ $18,845.42
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 850,097.38$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 91,604.57$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 175,689.38$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,631.25$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 192,446.60$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 25,289.59$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 85,291.95$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 148,952.35$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 13,425.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 750,727.81$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 03/03/2021
89
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
92%75%
126%75%
64%75%
88%75%
103%75%
204%75%
95%75%
80%75%
26%75%
52%75%
96%75%
805%75%
87%75%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
65%75%
90%75%
5%75%
74%75%
42%75%
0%75%
33%75%
71%75%
0%75%
61%75%
90
THROUGH PERIOD 9
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 28,654.79$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 267,189.86$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 38,112.27$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 4,538.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 31,757.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 3,862.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 13,275.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 25,711.69$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 1,400.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 149,789.30$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 4,081.91$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 18,282.92$
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 586,655.74$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 76,071.47$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 82,241.51$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,631.25$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 156,388.14$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 20,409.21$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 85,291.95$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 107,286.23$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 13,425.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 559,141.88$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 03/03/2021
91
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
57%75%
76%75%
50%75%
76%75%
93%75%
193%75%
89%75%
86%75%
18%75%
37%75%
82%75%
781%75%
60%75%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
54%75%
42%75%
5%75%
60%75%
34%75%
0%75%
33%75%
51%75%
0%75%
46%75%
92
THROUGH PERIOD 8
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 28,654.79$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 267,189.86$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 38,112.27$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 4,538.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 31,757.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 3,862.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 13,275.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 15,997.70$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 1,400.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 149,789.30$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 4,081.91$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 18,282.92$
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 576,941.75$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 76,071.47$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 82,241.51$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,631.25$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 156,388.14$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 20,409.21$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 85,291.95$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 107,286.23$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 13,425.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 559,141.88$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 03/03/2021
93
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
57%67%
76%67%
50%67%
76%67%
93%67%
193%67%
89%67%
53%67%
18%67%
37%67%
82%67%
781%67%
59%67%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
54%67%
42%67%
5%67%
60%67%
34%67%
0%67%
33%67%
51%67%
0%67%
46%67%
94
THROUGH PERIOD 7
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 28,654.79$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 267,189.86$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 33,216.82$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 4,174.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 31,757.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 3,862.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 13,275.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 17,806.30$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 1,400.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 149,849.30$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 4,081.91$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 14,744.92$
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 570,012.90$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 68,273.62$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 61,636.83$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,432.43$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 140,273.23$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 19,903.13$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 85,291.95$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 90,416.66$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 13,425.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 497,049.97$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 02/03/2021
95
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
57%58%
76%58%
44%58%
70%58%
93%58%
193%58%
89%58%
59%58%
18%58%
37%58%
82%58%
630%58%
58%58%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
49%58%
32%58%
4%58%
54%58%
33%58%
0%58%
33%58%
43%58%
0%58%
40%58%
96
THROUGH PERIOD 5
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 1,832.79$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 66,651.86$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 24,718.66$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 3,473.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 30,022.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 3,667.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 12,285.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 13,195.10$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 630.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 97,350.80$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 12,776.62$
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 266,603.83$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 52,689.47$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 54,611.15$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,432.43$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 107,891.31$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 9,719.80$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 84,916.95$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 50,786.73$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 10,740.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 389,184.96$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 12/2/2020
97
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
4%42%
19%42%
33%42%
58%42%
88%42%
183%42%
82%42%
44%42%
8%42%
24%42%
0%42%
546%42%
27%42%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
38%42%
28%42%
4%42%
42%42%
16%42%
0%42%
33%42%
24%42%
0%42%
32%42%
98
THROUGH PERIOD 4
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 1,460.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 57,404.86$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 21,052.16$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 2,903.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 29,407.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 3,667.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 12,285.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 13,274.60$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 630.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 97,350.80$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 11,965.00$
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 251,400.42$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 45,189.46$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 53,741.18$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,432.43$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 88,703.64$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 8,658.22$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 50,046.78$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 16,397.12$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 36,904.01$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 10,740.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 311,812.84$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 11/2/2020
99
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
3%33%
16%33%
28%33%
48%33%
86%33%
183%33%
82%33%
44%33%
8%33%
24%33%
0%33%
511%33%
26%33%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
32%33%
28%33%
4%33%
34%33%
15%33%
0%33%
33%33%
18%33%
0%33%
25%33%
100
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 925.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 42,127.86$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 14,109.83$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 2,012.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 26,037.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 3,127.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 10,935.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 8,926.60$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 480.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 72,378.30$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 9,465.00$
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 190,524.59$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL - NOT INCLUDING SEPT PAYROLL 139,994.00$ 22,718.05$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 29,419.54$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ 1,432.43$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL - NO SEPT PAYROLL 259,274.00$ 42,975.14$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 6,145.40$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 26,800.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL - NO SEPT PAYROLL 50,114.00$ 8,324.94$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 24,219.27$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 10,740.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 172,774.77$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 9/23/20
101
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
2%25%
12%25%
19%25%
34%25%
77%25%
156%25%
73%25%
30%25%
6%25%
18%25%
0%25%
404%25%
19%25%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
16%25%
15%25%
4%25%
17%25%
10%25%
0%25%
17%25%
12%25%
0%25%
14%25%
102
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 590.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 18,857.86$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 9,934.83$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 1,049.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 12,747.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 1,447.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 4,545.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 5,737.60$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 330.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 45,270.30$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 6,965.00$
TOTAL 977,840.00$ 107,474.59$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 22,718.05$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 28,158.92$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ -$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 42,975.14$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 5,108.63$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ 26,800.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 8,324.94$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 19,444.15$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 10,740.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 164,269.83$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 9/2/20
103
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
1%17%
5%17%
13%17%
17%17%
37%17%
72%17%
30%17%
19%17%
4%17%
11%17%
0%17%
298%17%
11%17%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
16%17%
14%17%
0%17%
17%17%
9%17%
0%17%
17%17%
9%17%
0%17%
13%17%
104
REVENUE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 50,000.00$ 280.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 350,000.00$ 9,734.00$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 5,277.00$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 6,000.00$ 1,049.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 34,000.00$ 612.50$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 7.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 15,000.00$ 165.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 30,000.00$ 3,355.00$
BOOT FEES 8,000.00$ 330.00$
CITATION REVENUE 400,000.00$ 22,032.90$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 4,465.00$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 170,000.00$
TOTAL 1,147,840.00$ 47,307.90$
EXPENDITURE FY21 BUDGET FY21 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 139,994.00$ 11,382.00$
ADMIN - OPERATING 194,973.00$ 9,887.89$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 35,000.00$ -$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 259,274.00$ 21,358.07$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 59,612.00$ 1,987.37$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 280,000.00$ -$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 50,114.00$ 4,162.48$
GARAGE - OPERATING 209,497.00$ 11,673.93$
GARAGE - CAPITAL -$ 10,740.00$
TOTAL 1,228,464.00$ 71,191.74$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 8/5/20
105
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
1%8%
3%8%
7%8%
17%8%
2%8%
0%8%
1%8%
11%8%
4%8%
6%8%
0%8%
191%8%
0%8%
4%8%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
8%8%
5%8%
0%8%
8%8%
3%8%
0%8%
8%8%
6%8%
0%8%
6%8%
106
REVENUE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 35,000.00$ 57,476.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 310,000.00$ 458,411.18$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 49,253.57$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 3,000.00$ 10,608.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 20,000.00$ 39,380.00$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 6,072.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 10,500.00$ 16,735.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 42,000.00$ 42,729.49$
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ 2,070.00$
CITATION REVENUE 300,000.00$ 347,244.57$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 24,033.94$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 35,050.84$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 250,000.00$
TOTAL 1,057,340.00$ 1,089,065.09$
EXPENDITURE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 112,779.00$ 103,430.69$
ADMIN - OPERATING 199,171.00$ 177,781.92$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 15,000.00$ 70,986.29$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 267,460.00$ 255,653.09$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 47,823.00$ 42,064.97$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 65,000.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 46,525.00$ 47,807.57$
GARAGE - OPERATING 178,911.00$ 217,775.42$
GARAGE - CAPITAL 150,000.00$ 13,425.00$
TOTAL 1,082,669.00$ 928,924.95$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 7/13/2020
107
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
164%100%
148%100%
65%100%
354%100%
197%100%
304%100%
159%100%
102%100%
104%100%
116%100%
481%100%
1498%100%
0%100%
103%100%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
92%100%
89%100%
473%100%
96%100%
88%100%
0%100%
103%100%
122%100%
0%100%
86%100%
108
REVENUE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 35,000.00$ 56,996.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 310,000.00$ 459,360.75$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 45,972.40$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 3,000.00$ 10,489.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 20,000.00$ 38,510.00$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 6,072.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 10,500.00$ 16,555.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 42,000.00$ 41,203.69$
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ 1,920.00$
CITATION REVENUE 300,000.00$ 327,352.77$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 18,729.38$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 32,760.84$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 250,000.00$
TOTAL 1,057,340.00$ 1,055,922.33$
EXPENDITURE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 112,779.00$ 92,081.83$
ADMIN - OPERATING 199,171.00$ 152,808.70$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 15,000.00$ 70,986.29$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 267,460.00$ 234,702.00$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 47,823.00$ 40,546.15$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 65,000.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 46,525.00$ 43,819.21$
GARAGE - OPERATING 178,911.00$ 200,415.88$
GARAGE - CAPITAL 150,000.00$ 13,425.00$
TOTAL 1,082,669.00$ 848,785.06$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 6/2/2020
109
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
163%92%
148%92%
61%92%
350%92%
193%92%
304%92%
158%92%
98%92%
96%92%
109%92%
375%92%
1400%92%
0%92%
100%92%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
82%92%
77%92%
473%92%
88%92%
85%92%
0%92%
94%92%
112%92%
0%92%
78%92%
110
REVENUE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 35,000.00$ 56,816.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 310,000.00$ 444,558.75$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 44,630.14$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 3,000.00$ 10,489.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 20,000.00$ 38,350.00$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 6,072.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 10,500.00$ 16,540.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 42,000.00$ 37,961.69$
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ 1,920.00$
CITATION REVENUE 300,000.00$ 315,393.07$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 18,729.38$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 32,537.84$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 250,000.00$
TOTAL 1,057,340.00$ 1,023,998.37$
EXPENDITURE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 112,779.00$ 81,369.60$
ADMIN - OPERATING 199,171.00$ 145,080.76$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 15,000.00$ 61,566.29$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 267,460.00$ 213,969.02$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 47,823.00$ 33,904.18$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 65,000.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 46,525.00$ 39,835.71$
GARAGE - OPERATING 178,911.00$ 186,864.28$
GARAGE - CAPITAL 150,000.00$
TOTAL 1,082,669.00$ 762,589.84$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 5/6/2020
111
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
162%83%
143%83%
59%83%
350%83%
192%83%
304%83%
158%83%
90%83%
96%83%
105%83%
375%83%
1391%83%
0%83%
97%83%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
72%83%
73%83%
410%83%
80%83%
71%83%
0%83%
86%83%
104%83%
0%83%
70%83%
112
REVENUE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 35,000.00$ 56,696.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 310,000.00$ 430,198.75$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 44,930.14$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 3,000.00$ 10,714.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 20,000.00$ 28,350.00$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 6,072.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 10,500.00$ 16,540.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 42,000.00$ 35,260.59$
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ 1,920.00$
CITATION REVENUE 300,000.00$ 296,877.87$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 13,648.01$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 29,967.84$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 250,000.00$
TOTAL 1,057,340.00$ 971,175.70$
EXPENDITURE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 112,779.00$ 73,185.57$
ADMIN - OPERATING 199,171.00$ 126,323.02$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 15,000.00$ 61,566.29$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 267,460.00$ 193,471.55$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 47,823.00$ 31,876.18$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 65,000.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 46,525.00$ 35,852.21$
GARAGE - OPERATING 178,911.00$ 133,749.99$
GARAGE - CAPITAL 150,000.00$
TOTAL 1,082,669.00$ 656,024.81$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 4/6/2020
113
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
162%75%
139%75%
60%75%
357%75%
142%75%
304%75%
158%75%
84%75%
96%75%
99%75%
273%75%
1281%75%
0%75%
92%75%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
65%75%
63%75%
410%75%
72%75%
67%75%
0%75%
77%75%
75%75%
0%75%
61%75%
114
REVENUE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 35,000.00$ 55,776.00$
GARAGE PERMITS 310,000.00$ 423,573.29$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 42,161.14$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 3,000.00$ 9,970.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 20,000.00$ 37,695.00$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 6,012.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 10,500.00$ 16,330.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 42,000.00$ 43,902.69$
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ 1,770.00$
CITATION REVENUE 300,000.00$ 460,705.77$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 9,018.55$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 24,897.84$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 250,000.00$
TOTAL 1,057,340.00$ 1,131,812.78$
EXPENDITURE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 112,779.00$ 64,994.05$
ADMIN - OPERATING 199,171.00$ 103,176.87$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 15,000.00$ 61,566.29$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 267,460.00$ 172,227.24$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 47,823.00$ 30,239.16$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 65,000.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 46,525.00$ 31,868.82$
GARAGE - OPERATING 178,911.00$ 98,139.74$
GARAGE - CAPITAL 150,000.00$
TOTAL 1,082,669.00$ 562,212.17$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 3/2/2020
115
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
159%67%
137%67%
56%67%
332%67%
188%67%
301%67%
156%67%
105%67%
89%67%
154%67%
180%67%
1064%67%
0%67%
107%67%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
58%67%
52%67%
410%67%
64%67%
63%67%
0%67%
68%67%
55%67%
0%67%
52%67%
116
REVENUE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 35,000.00$ 53,371.75$
GARAGE PERMITS 310,000.00$ 405,527.74$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 36,993.52$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 3,000.00$ 7,311.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 20,000.00$ 36,225.00$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 5,982.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 10,500.00$ 15,880.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 42,000.00$ 28,457.29$
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ 1,620.00$
CITATION REVENUE 300,000.00$ 244,299.20$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 9,018.55$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 20,347.84$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 250,000.00$
TOTAL 1,057,340.00$ 865,034.39$
EXPENDITURE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 112,779.00$ 56,749.56$
ADMIN - OPERATING 199,171.00$ 86,082.19$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 15,000.00$ 61,566.29$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 267,460.00$ 150,846.31$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 47,823.00$ 28,285.27$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 65,000.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 46,525.00$ 27,884.47$
GARAGE - OPERATING 178,911.00$ 87,051.32$
GARAGE - CAPITAL 150,000.00$
TOTAL 1,082,669.00$ 498,465.41$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 2/3/2020
117
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
152%58%
131%58%
49%58%
244%58%
181%58%
299%58%
151%58%
68%58%
81%58%
81%58%
180%58%
870%58%
0%58%
82%58%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
50%58%
43%58%
410%58%
56%58%
59%58%
0%58%
60%58%
49%58%
0%58%
46%58%
118
THROUGH PERIOD 6
REVENUE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
PARKING LOT PERMITS 35,000.00$ 49,502.23$
GARAGE PERMITS 310,000.00$ 294,825.30$
GARAGE - TRANSIENT REVENUE 75,500.00$ 33,866.44$
GARAGE VALIDATION COUPONS 3,000.00$ 7,311.00$
RESIDENTIAL NGHBD. PERMITS 20,000.00$ 34,725.00$
EMPLOYEE NGBHD. PERMITS 2,000.00$ 5,772.50$
VISITOR NGBHD. PERMITS 10,500.00$ 15,580.00$
ADMIN/LATE FEES 42,000.00$ 23,284.49$
BOOT FEES 2,000.00$ 1,470.00$
CITATION REVENUE 300,000.00$ 213,118.00$
INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00$ 7,146.48$
MISC REVENUE 2,340.00$ 20,243.34$
TRANSFERS / FROM OTHER FUNDS 250,000.00$
TOTAL 1,057,340.00$ 706,844.78$
EXPENDITURE FY20 BUDGET FY20 ACTUAL
ADMIN - PERSONNEL 112,779.00$ 48,490.88$
ADMIN - OPERATING 199,171.00$ 85,639.48$
ADMIN - CAPITAL 15,000.00$ 61,566.29$
ENFORCEMENT - PERSONNEL 267,460.00$ 129,913.95$
ENFORCEMENT - OPERATING 47,823.00$ 25,523.89$
ENFORCEMENT - CAPITAL 65,000.00$
GARAGE - PERSONNEL 46,525.00$ 23,900.98$
GARAGE - OPERATING 178,911.00$ 75,664.56$
GARAGE - CAPITAL 150,000.00$
TOTAL 1,082,669.00$ 450,700.03$
PARKING SERVICE FUND - OPERATING
AS OF 1/14/2020
119
% EARNED
YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
141%50%
95%50%
45%50%
244%50%
174%50%
289%50%
148%50%
55%50%
74%50%
71%50%
143%50%
865%50%
0%50%
67%50%
% SPENT YTD
% EXPECTED
YTD
43%50%
43%50%
410%50%
49%50%
53%50%
0%50%
51%50%
42%50%
0%50%
42%50%
120
1
Bozeman Parking Commission, 8/5/2021
BOZEMAN PARKING COMMISSION
Parking Program Manager’s Report
Date: Thursday, August 5, 2021
To: Bozeman Parking Commission
From: Mike Veselik, Interim Parking Manager
An update of major developments, in July, includes:
Passport App:The ParkingDepartment netted $2021 in parking revenue with 935total transactions. Additionally,
we are tracking our transaction numbers over time that are attached here as well.
Occupancy Data:We resolved an outstanding issue with how our parking counts were calculated. Staff hopes to
make the map available to the public by the end of August. To verify the accuracy of the map, parking staff have
engaged the services of Walker Consultants, pending City Commission approval, to conduct a manual parking
occupancy study. Upon completion of the study, staff will make recommendations to the Parking Commission and
City Commission on how to proceed.
Parking Software RFP:Finalists were invited to Bozeman for interviews. The selection committee determined the
top finalist and has entered into contract negotiations. The focus of these negotiations are on the scope of work
and charges for services.
Electric Vehicles:Parking Services Staff worked with the Sustainability Manager and their consultants to
determine the location for future electric vehicle charging stations in the garage. The consultants are planning a
report for City staff to plan for future electric vehicle charging stations.
Camping on City Streets:Parking staff has worked closely with the Police Department and the City Manager’s
office to chart a policy regarding people living in campers on city streets. The policy is shaped by a court case out
of Boise, ID negating local camping ordinances if cities do not have a safe place for individuals to go.
121
$-
$500.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
$2,000.00
$2,500.00
Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21
Net Revenue
122
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21
# of Sessions
123
Month # of Sessions Total Revenue Net Revenue Average Transaction Amount
Jan-21 140 292.00$ 243.00$ 2.09$
Feb-21 224 507.40$ 429.00$ 2.27$
Mar-21 458 1,210.30$ 1,050.00$ 2.64$
Apr-21 440 1,185.00$ 1,031.00$ 2.69$
May-21 420 1,060.00$ 913.00$ 2.52$
Jun-21 656 1,726.60$ 1,497.00$ 2.63$
Jul-21 935 2,348.25$ 2,021.00$ 2.51$
Aug-21
Sep-21
Oct-21
Nov-21
Dec-21
Totals 3273 8,329.55$ 7,184.00$
Monthly Average 468 1,189.94$ 1,026.29$ 2.48$
124
Bridger Park Garage - Average Peak Occupancy (April 2019 to July 2021)
Designated Peak # of Main Garage Vehicles %Main Garage
Weekday - Noon 191 57%
Weekday-Noon - Non-Hotel Permits (UDC & Monthly) 79 19%
Weekday- Noon- Hotel (UDC Leases)17 5%
Weekday Noon - Transient 115 34%
Weekend - Evening 98 29%
Main Garage Total Spaces 335 100%
125
Weekday Noon Peak Occupancy - Bridger Downtown Garage (April 2019 to July 2021)
Total # of
Vehicles
% of Main
Garage
Capacity
Total # of
Transient
Vehicles
Total
Number
of Permit
Vehicles Date Time Designated Peak
Day of
Week
UDC
Hotel
Permits
(Paid
Annual)
Permits
(Paid
Monthly)
UDC Hotel
% of Peak
Occupancy
219 65%132 87 4/4/2019 12:42 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 15 50 22 7%
189 56%137 52 4/9/2019 12:56 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 8 30 14 4%
335 100%278 57 6/7/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 6 36 15 2%
245 73%176 69 6/21/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 6 49 14 2%
301 90%224 77 7/19/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 39 20 18 13%
270 81%180 93 7/18/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 25 51 17 9%
257 77%161 96 8/1/2019 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 30 48 18 12%
235 70%137 98 8/6/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 31 50 17 13%
281 84%204 77 9/20/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 15 43 19 5%
268 80%186 82 9/27/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 21 48 13 8%
223 67%200 23 10/2/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 8 12 3 4%
231 69%135 96 10/4/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 28 50 18 12%
217 65%106 111 11/12/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 38 52 21 18%
309 92%225 84 11/21/2019 5:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 23 51 10 7%
267 80%167 100 12/19/2019 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 27 55 18 10%
247 74%146 101 12/18/2019 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 32 51 18 13%
206 61%115 91 1/7/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 30 46 15 15%
216 64%105 11 1/9/2020 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 38 55 18 18%
200 60%115 85 2/25/2020 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 29 42 24 15%
209 62%110 90 2/28/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 23 47 20 11%
180 54%87 93 3/10/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 18 58 17 10%
182 54%81 101 3/12/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 18 56 27 10%
52 16%12 40 4/29/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 4 28 8 8%
59 18%15 44 4/30/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 6 31 7 10%
102 30%49 53 5/14/2020 11:00 AM Weekday - Noon Thursday 11 30 12 11%
101 30%30 71 5/27/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 18 37 16 18%
174 52%90 84 6/16/2020 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 21 37 26 12%
146 44%65 81 6/17/2020 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 20 38 23 14%
132 39%52 80 7/22/2020 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 16 49 15 12%
120 36%45 75 7/23/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 9 44 22 8%
150 45%70 80 8/5/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 7 49 24 5%
142 42%61 81 8/11/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 11 47 23 8%
244 73%9/9/2020 2:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 0%
306 91%9/25/2020 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 0%
133 40%10/14/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 0%
140 42%10/21/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 0%
135 40%11/11/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 0%
102 30%11/19/2020 2:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 0%
142 42%12/9/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 0%
138 41%12/16/2020 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 0%
128 38%1/5/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday 0%
126 38%45 81 1/28/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 9 52 20 7%
133 40%53 75 2/10/2021 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 7 52 16 5%
141 42%52 89 2/25/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 6 63 52 4%
151 45%67 84 3/4/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 3 64 17 2%
152 45%61 91 3/31/2021 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday 6 66 19 4%
145 43%4/9/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday
265 79%4/28/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Wednesday
179 53%5/11/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday
183 55%5/20/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday
190 57%6/7/2021 12:00 PM Weekday - Noon Monday
209 62%6/29/2021 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Tuesday
265 79%155 110 7/15/2021 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Thursday 10 72 28 4%
257 77%164 93 7/16/2021 1:00 PM Weekday - Noon Friday 9 66 18 4%
191 57%115 79 17 47 19 7%
126
Weekend Evening Peak Occupancy - Bridger Garage (April 2019 to July 2021)
Total # of
Vehicles
% of Main
Garage
Capacity
Total # of
Transient
Vehicles
Total
Number of
Permit
Vehicles Date Time Designated Peak
Day of
Week
UDC
Hotel
Permits
(Paid
Annual)
Permits
(Paid
Monthly)
UDC Hotel
% of Peak
Occupancy
90 27%84 6 7/27/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 3 3 0 3%
82 24%66 16 1/18/2020 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 11 3 2 13%
143 43%103 40 1/31/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 9 23 8 6%
92 27%81 11 8/10/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 4 6 1 4%
93 28%84 9 8/23/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 1 4 4 1%
119 36%109 10 4/6/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 6 2 2 5%
149 44%134 15 7/26/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 6 7 2 4%
155 46%148 7 4/5/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 3 2 2 2%
196 59%178 18 6/8/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 5 6 7 3%
247 74%228 19 6/14/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 3 14 2 1%
238 71%226 12 9/13/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 5 6 1 2%
133 40%118 15 9/7/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 4 9 2 3%
177 53%141 36 10/1/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 14 12 10 8%
87 26%72 15 10/12/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 6 8 1 7%
141 42%127 14 11/22/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 3 6 5 2%
98 29%88 10 11/23/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 3 5 2 3%
182 54%170 12 12/6/2019 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 2 5 5 1%
177 53%156 21 12/7/2019 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 1 11 9 1%
90 27%82 8 2/15/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 2 4 2 2%
131 39%121 10 2/21/2020 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 5 4 1 4%
27 8%23 4 3/13/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 2 2 0 7%
10 3%0 10 3/14/2020 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 3 6 1 30%
3 1%2 1 4/24/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0 1 0 0%
8 2%5 3 4/25/2020 7:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 0 2 1 0%
25 7%13 12 5/29/2020 6:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 1 3 8 4%
4 1%2 2 5/23/2020 6:00 PM Saturday-Evening Saturday 0 2 0 0%
38 11%17 21 6/19/2020 7:00 PM Saturday-Evening Saturday 5 7 9 13%
53 16%39 14 6/27/2020 6:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 3 6 5 6%
28 8%23 5 7/18/2020 7:00 PM Saturday-Evening Saturday 0 1 4 0%
30 9%23 7 7/31/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0 2 5 0%
50 15%38 12 8/21/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0 6 6 0%
57 17%50 7 8/22/2020 8:00 PM Saturday-Evening Saturday 0 3 4 0%
107 32%9/18/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0%
126 38%9/25/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0%
53 16%10/17/2020 8:00 PM Saturday - Evening Saturday 0%
66 20%10/23/2020 8:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0%
52 16%11/12/2020 8:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0%
27 8%11/27/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0%
70 21%12/11/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0%
35 10%12/18/2020 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 0%
48 14%1/23/2021 7:00 PM Saturday-Evening Saturday 20 42%
79 24%1/29/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 17 22%
102 30%73 29 2/19/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 12 10 7 12%
127 38%96 31 2/26/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 8 16 7 6%
135 40%124 11 3/5/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 4 5 2 3%
132 39%116 16 3/26/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 5 4 7 4%
109 33%109 4/9/2021 8:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday
144 43%4/30/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday
135 40%5/7/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday
130 39%5/21/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday
120 36%6/25/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday
107 32%6/11/2021 8:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday
112 33%89 23 7/16/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 8 11 4 7%
100 30%81 19 7/30/2021 7:00 PM Friday - Evening Friday 8 7 4 8%
98 29%88 14 5 6 4 5%
127