HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-18-21 Public Comment - M. Eckhardt - re_ Application 20350, 20351 Bridger Meadows, agenda June 21, 2021From:Michele Eckhardt
To:Agenda
Subject:Comment re: Application 20350, 20351 Bridger Meadows, agenda June 21, 2021
Date:Friday, June 18, 2021 9:59:45 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing for public comment my opposition to Application 20350, proposal for development per the points listed
below. Bozeman has crossed a line unfortunately with its urban sprawl and relaxing of existing codes for further
development. In Bozeman, Gallatin Valley and Montana in general, water is an extremely important and sensitive
resource. Please do consider rejecting this application and preserving those we still have. The area under
consideration would also greatly impact adjacent preserved land/ trails which should also be considered.
1. Of utmost importance, I am opposed to the reduction in watercourse setback for lots 4-14 38.410.100.A.2
* The ponds on the property are an important habitat for migratory waterfowl
* The construction of buildings so close will discourage wildlife from inhabiting the ponds
* Clearly the area is not suited for building due to the height of the water table and the abundance of ponds
2. I am opposed to the relaxation of code 38.400.010.A.8 Requirement for a second means of public access to site.
* This poses a fire hazard to the adjacent owners
* The number of units in both the existing development and the new proposed development require multiple access
points for emergency vehicles
* A singular access point will create an unsafe traffic environment on Birdie Drive at an area that is already
congested due to daytime business parking on that street.
3. . I am opposed to the relaxation of code 38.410.040.B Allowance for a longer block length
* This poses a fire hazard to the adjacent owners
* The number of units in both the existing development and the new proposed development require a shorter block
length
Thank you,
Michele Eckhardt
Bozeman, MT
Sent from my iPhone