Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBozeman-Gateway-PUD_Ph-4-Apts_TIS_20210308_App-E-03 Capacity & Level-of-Service (LOS) Analyses IN THIS SECTION: 2023 Estimated Total Traffic Appendix E E-3 Bozeman Gateway PUD, Phase 4 Apartments 01/18/21 2023 - Estimated Total Traffic 23:57:53 Weekday, AM Peak Hour TEAPAC[Ver 9.50.02] - Capacity Analysis Summary (HCM 2016) Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Huffine Lane & Fowler Avenue V/C 0.558 (Critical V/C 0.758)Control Delay 24.6 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North Cmax= Gmax= 48.5" Gmax= 57.3" 120" Gavg= 40.5" Gavg= 53.4" Cavg= Y+Rc= 7.3" Y+Rc= 6.9" 108" Gmax= 48.5" Gmax= 57.3" Gavg= 40.5" Gavg= 53.4" Y+Rc= 7.3" Y+Rc= 6.9" Lane Width/ g/C Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Max Avg SatFlo Capcty Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 24.1 C+ R+ T 24/2 0.404 0.375 3546 1329 288 0.217 23.0 C+ 222 ft 40.5"53.4" 40.5"53.4" L 12/1 0.404 0.375 1220 470 111 0.236 26.8 C+ 96 ft NB Approach 34.4 C R 12/1 1576 591 21 0.036 21.4 C+ 15 ft T 12/1 0.404 0.375 1881 705 125 0.177 22.7 C+ 95 ft L 12/1 0.404 0.375 1093 414 317 0.765 40.0 D+ 301 ft WB Approach 21.1 C+ R+ T 24/2 0.477 0.494 3522 1739 844 0.485 20.2 C+ 543 ft L 14/1 0.477 0.494 294 125 35 0.280 44.9 D+ 48 ft EB Approach 23.9 C+ R 12/1 1562 771 365 0.473 20.2 C+ 238 ft T 24/2 0.477 0.494 3540 1748 1304 0.746 24.9 C+ 453 ft L 14/1 0.477 0.494 689 297 39 0.131 26.3 C+ 35 ft Bozeman Gateway PUD, Phase 4 Apartments 03/05/21 2023 - Estimated Total Traffic 20:20:45 Weekday, PM Peak Hour TEAPAC[Ver 9.50.02] - Capacity Analysis Summary (HCM 2016) Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Huffine Lane & Fowler Avenue V/C 0.665 (Critical V/C 0.889)Control Delay 41.3 Level of Service D+ Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North Cmax= Gmax= 63.4" Gmax= 72.4" 150" Gavg= 63.4" Gavg= 71.3" Cavg= Y+Rc= 7.3" Y+Rc= 6.9" 149" Gmax= 63.4" Gmax= 72.4" Gavg= 63.4" Gavg= 71.3" Y+Rc= 7.3" Y+Rc= 6.9" Lane Width/ g/C Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Max Avg SatFlo Capcty Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 30.6 C R+ T 24/2 0.423 0.426 3532 1504 151 0.100 25.7 C+ 148 ft 63.4"71.3" 63.4"71.3" L 12/1 0.423 0.426 1074 416 125 0.300 36.6 D+ 147 ft NB Approach 63.7 E+ R 12/1 1597 680 49 0.072 25.3 C+ 47 ft T 12/1 0.423 0.426 1892 806 240 0.298 28.2 C 219 ft L 12/1 0.423 0.426 1243 545 540 0.990 83.0 F 820 ft WB Approach 39.6 D+ R+ T 24/2 0.483 0.478 3597 1722 1330 0.772 38.8 D+ 1361 ft L 14/1 0.483 0.478 363 128 52 0.406 62.2 E+ 95 ft EB Approach 32.8 C R 12/1 1602 767 325 0.424 27.1 C+ 288 ft T 24/2 0.483 0.478 3557 1703 1182 0.694 32.6 C 559 ft L 14/1 0.483 0.478 430 122 56 0.458 70.5 E 109 ft HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Fowler & Technology Blvd Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Technology Boulevard West Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Fowler Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.75 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L TR L T TR L T TR Volume (veh/h)19 4 4 4 0 105 0 5 268 6 0 111 473 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 Proportion Time Blocked 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.56 6.56 6.96 7.50 6.50 6.92 4.16 4.14 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.53 4.03 3.33 3.50 4.00 3.31 2.23 2.22 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)25 11 5 140 7 148 Capacity, c (veh/h)119 227 177 830 939 1190 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.05 0.03 0.17 0.01 0.12 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.8 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)43.1 21.6 26.0 10.2 8.9 8.5 Level of Service (LOS)E C D B A A Approach Delay (s/veh)36.8 10.8 0.2 1.6 Approach LOS E B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 8:29:04 PMFowler-Ave+Technology-Blvd-W_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Fowler & Technology Blvd Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Technology Boulevard West Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Fowler Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L TR L T TR L T TR Volume (veh/h)29 6 6 5 0 333 0 6 398 12 0 232 286 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked 0.600 0.000 0.000 0.600 0.000 0.236 0.600 0.600 Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.56 6.56 6.96 7.50 6.50 6.92 4.16 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.53 4.03 3.33 3.50 4.00 3.31 2.23 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)32 13 6 370 7 258 Capacity, c (veh/h)155 171 267 830 646 655 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.08 0.02 0.45 0.01 0.39 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.7 0.3 0.1 2.3 0.0 1.9 Control Delay (s/veh)34.1 27.8 18.8 12.8 10.6 14.0 Level of Service (LOS)D D C B B B Approach Delay (s/veh)32.3 12.9 0.2 6.3 Approach LOS D B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 8:40:05 PMFowler-Ave+Technology-Blvd-W_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & Harmon Stream Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.74 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)1 480 277 38 26 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 5 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 6.45 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 3.55 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 38 Capacity, c (veh/h)1144 259 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.15 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.5 Control Delay (s/veh)8.1 21.3 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.0 21.3 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 1/19/2021 9:16:30 PMW-Garfield-St+Harmon-Stream-Blvd_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & Harmon Stream Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.87 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)3 294 411 91 77 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 1 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 6.40 6.21 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 3.50 3.31 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)3 94 Capacity, c (veh/h)1006 332 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.28 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 1.1 Control Delay (s/veh)8.6 20.1 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 20.1 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 8:45:11 PMW-Garfield-St+Harmon-Stream-Blvd_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Harmon Strm & Technology Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Technology Boulevard West Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.79 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)16 4 10 0 3 3 29 24 0 3 25 39 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)4 3 0 0 3 3 5 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.14 6.53 6.20 7.10 6.53 6.23 4.15 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.54 4.03 3.30 3.50 4.03 3.33 2.25 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)38 8 37 4 Capacity, c (veh/h)823 824 1498 1576 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.6 9.4 7.5 7.3 Level of Service (LOS)A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.6 9.4 4.2 0.3 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 8:50:04 PMHarmon-Stream-Blvd+Technology-Blvd-W_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Harmon Strm & Technology Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Technology Boulevard West Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.81 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)43 6 23 0 9 8 57 31 0 3 55 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)1 3 1 0 3 3 1 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.11 6.53 6.21 7.10 6.53 6.23 4.11 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.51 4.03 3.31 3.50 4.03 3.33 2.21 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)89 21 70 4 Capacity, c (veh/h)690 716 1455 1565 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.03 0.05 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)11.0 10.2 7.6 7.3 Level of Service (LOS)B B A A Approach Delay (s/veh)11.0 10.2 5.1 0.2 Approach LOS B B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 8:53:10 PMHarmon-Stream-Blvd+Technology-Blvd-W_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Harmon Strm & Rosauers Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Rosauers Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.78 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)38 0 6 2 1 1 4 40 2 1 67 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.12 6.50 6.20 7.10 6.50 6.20 4.10 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.52 4.00 3.30 3.50 4.00 3.30 2.20 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)56 5 5 1 Capacity, c (veh/h)786 788 1434 1564 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.9 9.6 7.5 7.3 Level of Service (LOS)A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.9 9.6 0.7 0.1 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:04:22 PMHarmon-Stream-Blvd+Rosauers-Access_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Harmon Strm & Rosauers Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Rosauers Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.86 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)55 0 20 5 1 1 5 82 1 10 93 97 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.10 6.50 6.20 7.10 6.50 6.20 4.10 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 4.00 3.30 3.50 4.00 3.30 2.20 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)87 8 6 12 Capacity, c (veh/h)694 647 1355 1510 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)10.9 10.6 7.7 7.4 Level of Service (LOS)B B A A Approach Delay (s/veh)10.9 10.6 0.5 0.4 Approach LOS B B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:07:05 PMHarmon-Stream-Blvd+Rosauers-Access_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Harmon & Jewelry Studio Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Jewelry Studio Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)45 26 61 18 67 79 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.20 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)84 79 Capacity, c (veh/h)725 1514 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh)10.6 7.5 Level of Service (LOS)B A Approach Delay (s/veh)10.6 3.7 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:12:17 PMHarmon-Stream-Blvd+Jewelry-Studio_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Harmon & Jewelry Studio Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Jewelry Studio Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.87 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)45 27 113 25 54 155 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.20 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)83 62 Capacity, c (veh/h)639 1433 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)11.5 7.6 Level of Service (LOS)B A Approach Delay (s/veh)11.5 2.2 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:15:09 PMHarmon-Stream-Blvd+Jewelry-Studio_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Huffine & Harmon Stream Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman / MDT Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Huffine Lane (US 191) Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.96 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)0 49 1089 71 0 88 725 11 3 1 83 1 1 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 24 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 4 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec)4.14 4.16 7.50 6.50 6.94 8.30 7.30 7.78 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.23 3.50 4.00 3.32 3.50 4.00 3.54 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)51 92 91 22 Capacity, c (veh/h)843 562 457 344 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.16 0.20 0.06 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.6 0.7 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh)9.5 12.6 14.8 16.2 Level of Service (LOS)A B B C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.4 1.4 14.8 16.2 Approach LOS B C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 1/19/2021 11:45:20 PMHuffine-Ln+Harmon-Stream-Blvd_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Huffine & Harmon Stream Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman / MDT Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Huffine Lane (US 191) Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Harmon Stream Boulevard Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.94 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)0 58 1104 79 0 131 1155 15 1 1 138 9 1 115 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 5 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 4 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 4.12 7.50 6.50 6.92 8.30 7.30 7.40 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 2.21 3.50 4.00 3.31 3.50 4.00 3.35 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)62 139 149 133 Capacity, c (veh/h)562 549 372 225 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.25 0.40 0.59 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 1.0 1.9 3.4 Control Delay (s/veh)12.2 13.8 21.0 41.8 Level of Service (LOS)B B C E Approach Delay (s/veh)0.6 1.4 21.0 41.8 Approach LOS C E Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:21:53 PMHuffine-Ln+Harmon-Stream-Blvd_PM_2023-Total.xtw Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apartments TIS 01/20/21 2023 - Estimated Total Traffic 00:20:48 Weekday, AM Peak Hour TEAPAC[Ver 9.50.02] - Capacity Analysis Summary (HCM 2016) Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Huffine Ln & W College St V/C 0.487 (Critical V/C 0.383)Control Delay 20.8 Level of Service C+ Sq 51 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** North Cmax= Gmax= 32.3" Gmax= 29.7" Gmax= 38.0" 120" Gavg= 10.0" Gavg= 22.9" Gavg= 30.9" Cavg= Y+Rc= 3.0" Y+Rc= 7.7" Y+Rc= 7.1" 82" Gmax= 34.5" Gmax= 29.7" Gmax= 38.0" Gavg= 2.0" Gavg= 30.8" Gavg= 30.9" Y+Rc= 3.0" Y+Rc= 7.7" Y+Rc= 7.1" Lane Width/ g/C Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Max Avg SatFlo Capcty Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 20.5 C+ R 14/1 1528 429 5 0.012 21.2 C+ 3 ft 10.0" 22.9"30.9" 2.0" 30.8"30.9" T 12/1 0.248 0.279 1763 495 10 0.020 21.2 *C+ 6 ft L 12/1 0.288 0.025 1810 526 18 0.034 19.9 B 10 ft NB Approach 32.5 C R+ T 12/1 0.248 0.376 1599 605 32 0.053 16.1 B 18 ft L 24/2 0.269 0.121 3497 427 242 0.567 34.6 *C 101 ft WB Approach 20.1 C+ R+ T 24/2 0.316 0.377 3586 1359 611 0.450 19.1 B 339 ft L 14/1 0.316 0.377 544 196 59 0.300 29.7 C 46 ft EB Approach 18.4 B R 12/1 0.025 0.377 1582 793 303 0.382 12.7 B+ 135 ft T 24/2 0.316 0.377 3505 1328 788 0.593 20.4 *C+ 220 ft L 14/1 0.316 0.377 823 295 19 0.064 23.4 C+ 13 ft Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apartments TIS 03/05/21 2023 - Estimated Total Traffic 21:27:27 Weekday, PM Peak Hour TEAPAC[Ver 9.50.02] - Capacity Analysis Summary (HCM 2016) Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Huffine Ln & W College St V/C 0.534 (Critical V/C 0.479)Control Delay 27.8 Level of Service C Sq 61 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** North m Cmax= Gmax= 41.8" Gmax= 37.5" Gmax= 50.9" 150" Gavg= 15.9" Gavg= 29.7" Gavg= 46.6" Cavg= Y+Rc= 3.0" Y+Rc= 7.7" Y+Rc= 7.1" 110" Gmax= 6.0" Gmax= 73.3" Gmax= 52.7" Gavg= 5.7" Gavg= 39.9" Gavg= 46.6" Y+Rc= 3.0" Y+Rc= 7.7" Y+Rc= 7.1" Lane Width/ g/C Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Max Avg SatFlo Capcty Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 28.7 C R 14/1 1630 440 51 0.116 30.3 *C 47 ft 15.9"29.7"46.6" 5.7" 39.9"46.6" T 12/1 0.250 0.270 1857 501 59 0.118 30.3 C 54 ft L 12/1 0.040 0.052 1810 518 93 0.180 26.8 *C+ 78 ft NB Approach 43.2 D+ R+ T 12/1 0.489 0.363 1685 611 89 0.146 23.7 C+ 73 ft L 24/2 0.279 0.145 3469 501 397 0.792 47.6 *D 208 ft WB Approach 26.0 C+ R+ T 24/2 0.339 0.424 3623 1535 882 0.575 24.6 C+ 620 ft L 14/1 0.339 0.424 525 184 87 0.472 40.1 D+ 98 ft EB Approach 22.8 C+ R 12/1 0.020 0.424 1591 904 228 0.252 12.0 B+ 121 ft T 24/2 0.351 0.424 3529 1495 900 0.602 24.8 *C+ 320 ft L 14/1 0.351 0.424 658 222 59 0.266 35.3 D+ 60 ft HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection College & 29th Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West College Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.89 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph .4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration L T R TR R R Volume (veh/h)7 363 89 265 6 76 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 1 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 6.2 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 6.21 6.20 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.3 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 3.31 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)8 85 1 Capacity, c (veh/h)1266 637 742 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.13 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.5 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)7.9 11.5 9.9 Level of Service (LOS)A B A Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 11.5 9.9 Approach LOS B A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:34:07 PMW-College-St+S-29th-Ave_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection College & 29th Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West College Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph .4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration L T R TR R R Volume (veh/h)11 323 112 476 4 112 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)5 1 0 Proportion Time Blocked 0.000 0.000 0.000 Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 6.2 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.15 6.21 6.20 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.3 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.25 3.31 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)12 118 2 Capacity, c (veh/h)1040 695 570 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.17 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.6 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)8.5 11.2 11.3 Level of Service (LOS)A B B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 11.2 11.3 Approach LOS B B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:39:31 PMW-College-St+S-29th-Ave_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection S 29th Ave & City Brew Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street City Brew / Qdoba Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.88 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)46 14 11 30 55 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 8 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.28 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.37 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)68 13 Capacity, c (veh/h)869 1498 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.3 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.5 7.4 Level of Service (LOS)A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.5 2.0 Approach LOS A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:41:43 PMS-29th-Ave+City-Brew-Access_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection S 29th Ave & City Brew Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street City Brew / Qdoba Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.87 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)77 26 27 36 45 67 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.20 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)118 31 Capacity, c (veh/h)823 1470 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.02 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.5 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)10.1 7.5 Level of Service (LOS)B A Approach Delay (s/veh)10.1 3.3 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:44:00 PMS-29th-Ave+City-Brew-Access_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection S 29th Ave & Kohl's Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Kohl's Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.84 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)2 3 10 39 66 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.20 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)6 12 Capacity, c (veh/h)919 1525 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 7.4 Level of Service (LOS)A A Approach Delay (s/veh)8.9 1.6 Approach LOS A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:47:06 PMS-29th-Ave+Kohls-Access_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection S 29th Ave & Kohl's Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Kohl's Access Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)8 10 12 55 60 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)7 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.47 6.20 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.56 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)21 14 Capacity, c (veh/h)894 1526 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 7.4 Level of Service (LOS)A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.1 1.4 Approach LOS A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:49:38 PMS-29th-Ave+Kohls-Access_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection S 29th & Technology Blvd Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Technology Boulevard West Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.77 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)15 1 6 2 2 6 10 28 2 15 46 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 0 2 0 50 0 1 11 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.13 6.50 6.22 7.10 7.00 6.20 4.11 4.21 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.53 4.00 3.32 3.50 4.45 3.30 2.21 2.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)29 13 13 19 Capacity, c (veh/h)808 859 1531 1509 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.6 9.3 7.4 7.4 Level of Service (LOS)A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.6 9.3 1.9 1.7 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:55:41 PMS-29th-Ave+Technology-Blvd-W_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection S 29th & Technology Blvd Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street Technology Boulevard West Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.87 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)18 1 8 3 1 6 7 43 2 4 51 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)7.12 6.50 6.21 7.10 6.50 6.20 4.13 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.52 4.00 3.31 3.50 4.00 3.30 2.23 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)31 11 8 5 Capacity, c (veh/h)840 906 1503 1562 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.4 9.0 7.4 7.3 Level of Service (LOS)A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.4 9.0 1.0 0.4 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 9:57:30 PMS-29th-Ave+Technology-Blvd-W_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & 29th Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.76 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)26 488 303 44 30 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)1 1 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.11 6.41 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.21 3.51 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)34 51 Capacity, c (veh/h)1110 251 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.20 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh)8.3 23.0 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.8 23.0 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 1/20/2021 3:16:28 AMW-Garfield-St+S-29th-Ave_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & 29th Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street South 29th Avenue Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.88 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)5 366 474 31 39 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 1 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.41 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.51 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)6 84 Capacity, c (veh/h)992 355 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.24 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.9 Control Delay (s/veh)8.6 18.3 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 18.3 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 10:04:49 PMW-Garfield-St+S-29th-Ave_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & W Site Access Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street West Site Access Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.76 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)2 504 309 3 7 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)3 17 Capacity, c (veh/h)1143 338 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh)8.2 16.2 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 16.2 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 1/20/2021 4:17:08 AMW-Garfield-St+W-Site-Access_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & W Site Access Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street West Site Access Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.88 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)5 366 498 8 5 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)6 10 Capacity, c (veh/h)993 341 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)8.6 15.9 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 15.9 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 10:09:22 PMW-Garfield-St+W-Site-Access_PM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & E Site Access Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street East Site Access Time Analyzed Weekday, AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.76 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)1 510 310 2 4 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 8 Capacity, c (veh/h)1143 302 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)8.2 17.2 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.0 17.2 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 10:10:52 PMW-Garfield-St+E-Site-Access_AM_2023-Total.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Intersection Garfield & E Site Access Agency/Co.E5 Engineering, PLLC Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/17/2020 East/West Street West Garfield Street Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street East Site Access Time Analyzed Weekday, PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.88 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Bozeman Gateway PUD, Ph. 4 Apts | Total Traffic Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LR Volume (veh/h)2 369 505 4 2 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)2 3 Capacity, c (veh/h)990 319 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)8.6 16.4 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 16.4 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2021 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 7.9 Generated: 3/5/2021 10:15:06 PMW-Garfield-St+E-Site-Access_PM_2023-Total.xtw