Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-09-21 DRB Agenda & PacketA.Call meeting to order B.Disclosures C.Changes to the Agenda D.Approval of Minutes D.1 Approval of meeting minutes for April 28th, 2021 (Krueger) E.Public Comment Please state your name and address in an audible tone of voice for the record. This is the time for THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA DRB AGENDA Wednesday, June 9, 2021 WebEx Meeting Information Via Webex: https://cityofbozeman.webex.com/cityofbozeman/onstage/g.php? MTID=e991bb5ef98b77adbdb6c92ac3d132aac Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit. Click Join Now to enter the meeting Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream or channel 190 • Call-in toll number (US/Canada ): 1-650-479-3208 • Access code: 182 828 9381 Public Comment: If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda, please send an email to agenda@bozeman.net prior to 4:00pm on Wednesday, June 9th, 2021. You may also comment by visiting the City's public comment page. You can also comment by joining the Webex meeting. If you do join the Webex meeting, we ask you please be patient in helping us work through this online meeting. If you are not able to join the Webex meeting and would like to provide oral comment you may send a request to agenda@bozeman.net with your phone number, the item(s) you wish to comment on, and someone will call you during the meeting to provide an opportunity to comment. You may also send the above information via text to 406-224-3967. As always, the meeting will be streamed through the City's video page (click the Streaming Live in the drop down menu), and available in the City on cable channel 190. 1 individuals to comment on matters falling within the purview of the Committee. There will also be an opportunity in conjunction with each action item for comments pertaining to that item. Please limit your comments to three minutes. F.Action Items F.1 Bridger Meadows Preliminary Planned Unit Development, application 20350.(Rosenberg) F.2 21-047, Flanders Mill Apartments Phase II & III; A Site Plan application for the construction of 122 residential units consisting of seven 12-unit buildings, three 6-unit buildings, and five 4-unit buildings.(Miller) F.3 One11 2.0 Site Plan and Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) with Demolitions (DEM), Application 20456(Danielle Garber) G.FYI/Discussions H.Adjournment For more information please contact Brian Krueger bkrueger@bozeman.net This board generally meets the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of the month from 5:30 to 7:30 Committee meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and require assistance, please contact our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray at 582-3232 (TDD 582-2301). 2 Memorandum REPORT TO:Design Review Board FROM:Taylor Chambers SUBJECT:Approval of meeting minutes for April 28th, 2021 MEETING DATE:June 9, 2021 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Minutes RECOMMENDATION:Suggested Motion: I move to approve the April 28th, 2021 meeting minutes. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.2 Community Engagement: Broaden and deepen engagement of the community in city government, innovating methods for inviting input from the community and stakeholders. BACKGROUND:None UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:1. Approve the meeting minutes with corrections 2. Do not approve the meeting minutes. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: 04-28-21 DRB Minutes DRAFT.pdf Report compiled on: May 19, 2021 3 Bozeman Design Review Board Meeting Minutes, 04-28-21 Page 1 of 3 THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA MINUTES Wednesday. April 28th, 2021 Due to connectivity issues, audio was not recorded during the staff presentation. The PowerPoint is included in the minutes. WebEx Meeting Information Present: Mark Hufstetler, Allison Bryan, Troy Scherer, M Ethan Barlow, Erin Eisner, Paul East, Brady Ernst Absent: None A) 00:07:44 Call meeting to order B) 00:09:36 Disclosures C) 00:09:37 Changes to the Agenda D) 00:09:49 Approval of Minutes D.1 00:09:51 Approval of Minutes for 04-14-21 04-14-21 DRB Minutes DRAFT.pdf 00:10:16 Motion Suggested Motion: I move to approve the minutes from April 14, 2021 Troy Scherer: Motion M Ethan Barlow: 2nd 00:10:16 Vote on the Motion to approve Suggested Motion: I move to approve the minutes from April 14, 2021. The Motion carried 6 - 0 Approve: Mark Hufstetler 4 Bozeman Design Review Board Meeting Minutes, 04-28-21 Page 2 of 3 Allison Bryan Troy Scherer M Ethan Barlow Erin Eisner Brady Ernst Disapprove: None E) 00:10:22 Public Comment F) Action Items F.1 00:13:35 20-406, Courtyard Hotel by Marriot - Boot Hill Court; A Site Plan and Special Use Permit Application to Allow for the for the Construction of a 71,250 Square Foot Hotel with 117 Guest Rooms, 142 Parking Spaces, On-Premise Consumption of Alcohol and Associated Site Improvements in the M-1 Zone. 20406 Courtyard Hotel by Marriot SR.pdf 20-406 Courtyard Marriott Planner Presentation 00:14:10 Staff Presentation Due to connectivity issues, audio was not recorded during the staff presentation. The PowerPoint is included in the minutes. City Planner Jacob Miller presented on behalf of City Staff, and provided a brief overview of the proposed Site Plan application. 00:21:18 Board Questions Design Review Board members directed questions toward the applicant and staff. 00:47:31 Public Comment Opportunity. 00:50:31 Board discussion on action item. 00:47:02 Motion “Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20406 and move to recommend approval of the site plan application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions.” M Ethan Barlow: Motion Troy Scherer: 2nd 01:01:21 Vote on the Motion to approve “Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff 5 Bozeman Design Review Board Meeting Minutes, 04-28-21 Page 3 of 3 report for application 20406 and move to recommend approval of the site plan application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions.” The Motion carried 7 - 0 Approve: Mark Hufstetler Allison Bryan Troy Scherer M Ethan Barlow Erin Eisner Paul East Brady Ernst Disapprove: None G) FYI/Discussions H) 01:01:23 Adjournment For more information please contact Brian Krueger bkrueger@bozeman.net. This board generally meets the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of the month from 5:30 to 7:30 6 Memorandum REPORT TO:Design Review Board FROM:Sarah Rosenberg, Associate Planner Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Martin Matsen, Director of Community Development SUBJECT:Bridger Meadows Preliminary Planned Unit Development, application 20350. MEETING DATE:June 9, 2021 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Quasi-Judicial RECOMMENDATION:“Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20350 and move to recommend approval of the Bridger Meadows Planned Unit Development application with relaxations numbers 1-6, subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions.” STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:The property owner and applicant submitted an application for the construction of 16 residential dwelling units on 16 lots. The development also includes a 7.15 acre wildlife refuge and wetland preservation site, and 1.72 acres of open space. The site is presently vacant and surrounded by residential subdivisions to the north and east, a commercial development to the south and Glen Rotary Park to the west. The site is accessed from Birdie Drive to the east and emergency vehicle access from Commercial Drive to the south. There is an access easement through the Links Condominium Development to the east. The property is zoned R-1. For full analysis and background, see attached staff report. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:1. Recommend Approval of the application with the recommended conditions and report findings; 2. Recommend Approval of the application with modifications to the recommended conditions and modifications to the report findings; 3. Recommend Denial the application based on the Design Review Board’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the 7 staff report; or 4. Open and continue the review on the application with the concurrence of the applicant, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS:NA Attachments: 20350 DRB Staff Report.docx Report compiled on: June 2, 2021 8 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 1 of 18 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Preliminary Plan Date:Design Review Board, June 9, 2021 at 5:30 pm. Project Description: A Preliminary PUD to create a major subdivision that includes 16 single family household lots on 11.87 acres. The development also includes a 7.15 acre wildlife refuge and wetland preservation site and 1.72 acres of open space. The property is zoned R-1. Six relaxations are requested with this application. This project includes a Preliminary Plat and comments on that application are affiliated with application number 20351. Project Location:S31, T01S, R05E, C.O.S. 885 TRACT NW4SE4, 12 acres, Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with conditions and code provisions Motion: “Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20350 and move to recommend approval of the Bridger Meadows Planned Unit Development application with relaxations numbers 1-6, subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions.” Report Date: June 3, 2021 Staff Contact:Sarah Rosenberg, AICP, Associate Planner Executive Summary The property owner and applicant submitted an application for the construction of 16 residential dwelling units on 16 lots. The development also includes a 7.15 acre wildlife refuge and wetland preservation site, and 1.72 acres of open space. The site is presently vacant and surrounded by residential subdivisions to the north and east, a commercial development to the south and Glen Rotary Park to the west. The site is accessed from Birdie Drive to the east and emergency vehicle access from Commercial Drive to the south. There is an access easement through the Links Condominium Development to the east. The property is zoned R-1. Six relaxations to the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) zoning regulations are proposed with the application: 1. 38.400.010.A.8. A relaxation from the requirement for a second means of public access to the site. 2. 38.400.010.A.9. A relaxation to allow for a cul-de-sac. 3. 38.400.020.A.2. A relaxation from the 60’ width right of way requirement, instead providing a 50’ width. 4. 38.400.080. A relaxation from the requirement to provide a sidewalk along both sides of the street with only one side of the street having a sidewalk. 5. 38.410.040.B. A relaxation from the block length requirements. 6. 38.410.100.A.2. A relaxation from the requirements to reduce the watercourse setback for lots 4 through 14, which is 50 feet. 9 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 2 of 18 The criteria for granting a PUD are found in BMC 38.430.090. A PUD is a discretionary approval and the review authority must find that the overall development is superior to that offered by the basic existing zoning standards as required in BMC 38.20.030.A.4. The intent of a PUD is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in development proposals within the City. The applicants can request relaxations from the code in exchange for a higher quality of design. The obligation to show a superior outcome is the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant asserts that the overall outcome of the proposal is superior to what would be obtained from the application. The Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the application. Based on its evaluation of the application against the criteria, the Development Review Committee (DRC) found the application adequate for continued review. The application is complete for design review purposes. The Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to review the application on Wednesday, June 9, 2021. The Design Review Board is the design review advisory body to the City Commission on this application. The DRB is required to make a recommendation to the City Commission on this application. The City Commission is scheduled to review the application on July 20, 2021. This project is affiliated with a preliminary plat application (20351). Unresolved Issues None. Alternatives 1. Recommend Approval of the application with the recommended conditions and report findings; 2. Recommend Approval of the application with modifications to the recommended conditions and modifications to the report findings; 3. Recommend Denial the application based on the Design Review Board’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the review on the application with the concurrence of the applicant, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 10 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 3 of 18 Table of Contents Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................1 Unresolved Issues.............................................................................................................................2 Alternatives......................................................................................................................................2 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES.........................................................................................................................4 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION / DEVIATIONS / VARIANCES......................................................7 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ...................................................................7 SECTION 4 – REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS...........................................................................................7 SECTION 5 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS.........................................................................................9 APPENDIX A –PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY...............................................................16 APPENDIX B – OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF..........................................................17 APPENDIX C –PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT........................................................................17 ATTACHMENTS.....................................................................................................................................18 11 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 4 of 18 SECTION 1 -MAP SERIES Zoning Classification 12 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 5 of 18 Overall Site Plan 13 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 6 of 18 Illustrative Plan 14 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 7 of 18 Section 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION / DEVIATIONS / VARIANCES 1. 38.400.010.A.8. A relaxation from the requirement for a second means of public access to the site. 2. 38.400.010.A.9. A relaxation to allow for a cul-de-sac. 3. 38.400.020.A.2. A relaxation from the 60’ width right of way requirement, instead providing a 50’ width. 4. 38.400.080. A relaxation from the requirement to provide a sidewalk along both sides of the street with only one side of the street having a sidewalk. 5. 38.410.040.B. A relaxation from the block length requirements to allow for a longer block length. 6. 38.410.100.A.2. A relaxation from the requirements to reduce the watercourse setback for lots 4 through 14, which is 50 feet. The relaxations may be granted with a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The criteria for granting PUD relaxations are included in BMC 38.430.030.A.4.c.Staff has reviewed the criteria and finds that the relaxations meet justification for approval. Section 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. The final planned unit development plan must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to the approval of any subsequent site plan. 3. The requested relaxations to the following sections are granted as proposed in the application materials and must be reflected in the final planned unit development plan, design guidelines, and associated property owners’ association documents as approved: a) 38.400.010.A.8. A relaxation from the requirement for a second means of public access to the site. b) 38.400.010.A.9. A relaxation to allow for a cul-de-sac. c) 38.400.020.A.2. A relaxation from the 60’ width right of way requirement, instead providing a 50’ width. d) 38.400.080. A relaxation from the requirement to provide a sidewalk along both sides of the street with only one side of the street having a sidewalk. e) 38.410.040.B. A relaxation from the block length requirements to allow for a longer block length. f)38.410.100.A.2. A relaxation from the requirements to reduce the watercourse setback for lots 4 through 14, which is 50 feet. 4. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 5. The final planned unit development plan must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to the approval of any subsequent site plan. 15 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 8 of 18 6. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final PUD Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how they have responded to each of these comments. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 7. Trail totems shall be installed at the entrances of the trail. Final design of the trail totem must be approved by the Parks Department. 8. Ten foot front setback utility easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans either through individual recordable documents or thorough the subdivision exemption review process prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 9. The PUD Final Plan shall be completed and before the approval of the final plat. 10. A notice prepared by the City shall be filed concurrently with the final plat so that it will appear on title reports. It shall read substantially as follows: Lots within the Bridger Meadows Subdivision Phase are subject to specific design standards, unique building setbacks from property lines, and restrictions on use. These standards may be found in [insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to the Bridger Meadows Subdivision and are in place of the general development standards of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Bridger Meadows approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Bridger Meadows Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process. Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. 11. The City of Bozeman has relied upon the overall design standards proposed as part of the planned unit development application in covenants and PUD Design Manual. 12. With final PUD covenants and design manual, provide one page exhibit of each lot identified by legal description that includes setback requirements, watercourse setback zones (if applicable), building area, and landscape/watercourse setback planting requirements. 13. No accessory structures, patios, or recreational equipment (i.e. swingset, trampoline, etc.) can be located within the watercourse setback. This language should be included in the Design Manual and Covenants. 14. Public access easements must be provided for as shown on the preliminary planned unit development plans for all publicly accessible open space areas prior to final planned unit development plan approval. 15. No property may be removed from the PUD or covenants without written approval of the City of Bozeman. 16. The City of Bozeman has relied upon the overall design and design standards required as part of the planned unit development application. The design and design standards may not be altered without consent of the City. 16 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 9 of 18 Section 4 – Required Code Provisions 1. 38.410.100. With the final PUD, a watercourse planting plan must be prepared that identifies the maintenance of the watercourse setback landscaping. The landscaping identified in the watercourse planting plan must be installed or financially guaranteed prior to final plat approval. Section 5 – Staff Analysis and Findings Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Applicable Plan Review Criteria, Section 38.230.100, BMC. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not in any way create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy Yes. The property has a future land use designation of Urban Neighborhood. The change in intensity is anticipated by the growth policy in areas of the city with adequate infrastructure. The proposed use of residential units is in conformance to and consistent with the City’s adopted growth policy, the Bozeman Community Plan, including the following goals and objectives: Goal N-1.4: Promote the development of accessory dwelling units. The Bridger Meadows development allows for accessory dwelling units as outlined in the R-1 zone district allowable uses and the Design Covenants. Goal N-1.10: Increase connectivity between parks and neighborhoods through continued trail and sidewalk development. Prioritize closing gaps within the network. The Bridger Meadows development provides additional pathways that connect to the City’s existing trail network. A pedestrian network borders the northeast that connects to the Glen Lake Rotary Park and the Story Mill Community Park. Goal EPO-2: Work to ensure that development is responsive to natural features. Sensitive lands exist on the site which are to be preserved into a 7.15 wildlife refuge area. This area is located to the west of the developable lots. This wildlife refuge is adjacent to the Glen Lakes Rotary park area which creates a larger ecosystem that promotes habitation for wildlife and additional preservation of natural features. 2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations There are no known violations on the property. The project proposes several alternative standards for development within the PUD. If the remaining PUD and subdivision processes are completed, 17 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 10 of 18 and the City Commission approves the requested relaxations, then the project will be in conformance. If the Commission does not approve the relaxations then the project will not be in conformance and should not be approved. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations The proposed uses of the site are consistent with regulations. If approved, additional steps will be required including but not limited to final payment for cash in lieu of water rights, approval of the final planned unit development, dedication of the utility easements, construction of infrastructure, and building permits. The Building Division of the Department of Community Development will review the requirements of the International Building Code for compliance at the time of building permit application. Condition of approval 1 requires full compliance with all applicable code requirements. 4. Conformance with special review criteria for applicable permit type as specified in article 2 The PUD criteria are reviewed below. The project meets the requirements and criteria as presented. 5. Conformance with the zoning provisions of article 3, including permitted uses, form and intensity standards and requirements, applicable supplemental use criteria, and wireless facilities and/or affordable housing provisions if applicable The uses are permitted in the R-1 district. Form and intensity standards are met with the proposal. No relaxations from the R-1 form and intensity standards are requested with this application. Future building permits will be reviewed to determine compliance with 38.350.070: Parking and garage for single to four household residential uses and 38.360.220: Single, two, three, and four household dwellings. 6. Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4, including transportation facilities and access, community design and element provisions, and park and recreational requirements Access to the site is via a proposed extension of the drive off Birdie Drive through the Links Condominium development to the east via a public access easement. A secondary emergency access to the site comes from the south off Commercial Drive. This access is gated at the property line that is in accordance to Fire Department requirements. This second access is not feasible as a public entrance due to physical constraints on the alignment and the connection to Commercial Drive. Relaxation number 1 requests there only be one public access in which the Development Review Committee (DRC) is in support of since there are no other possible location for public access due to the presence of critical lands and adjacency to parks and other development. . A cul-de-sac is proposed at the end of the drive through the development with relaxation number 2. Typically, cul-de-sacs are prohibited unless they are deemed necessary due to topography, the presence of critical lands, lack of other options for legal access, or other similar site constraints. Since there are site constraints and critical lands within the development, a cul-de-sac is requested 18 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 11 of 18 to provide access to the interior home sites. The DRC has analyzed this proposal and found that the use of the cul-de-sac is deemed necessary. A relaxation for a narrower right of way width of 50 feet rather than the standards 60 feet is requested to eliminate impacts to the existing wetlands. The street itself meets all City standards for all local street including curb-to-curb width, slopes, and horizontal alignment. The DRC is in support of this relaxation. Pedestrian access is provided from the street directly through and into the project. Rather than a sidewalk on both sides of the street as relaxation number 4 requests, the East Gallatin trail along the north side of the road provides pedestrian circulation to and around the development. A spur trail through open space 1 and 2 adjacent to lot 1 and in between lots 7 and 8 provide a midblock pedestrian connection for viewing of the wildlife refuge. This also helps alleviate the long block length that the applicant is requesting with relaxation number 5. The DRC is in support of both of these relaxations since there is adequate pedestrian infrastructure to connect the development to adjacent lands. All open space and trails through the development include a public pedestrian easement so that community members can access views of the wildlife refuge. Water and sewer is provided to each lot through mains within the city owned rights of way. The applicant will be constructing water mains to support the site. Site surface drainage generally meets standards at this level in the design for the streets and development. Cash in lieu of water rights is proposed and will be paid with the final site plan for site development. Parkland is required for the site and the applicant is requesting a cash-in-lieu of dedicated parkland since the development is nearby the Glen Lake Rotary Park and Story Mill Community Park. The City has not accepted the 7.15 acres of the wildlife refuge as parkland due to environmental and natural resource constraints. This will be maintained by the Property Owners Association. 7. Conformance with the project design provisions of article 5, including compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development; design and arrangement of the elements of the plan; landscaping; open space; lighting, signage; Not applicable as any residence of 5 or lesser units does not have to adhere to Article 5. 8. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives set forth in articles 4—6, including the enhancement of the natural environment, watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats; and if the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area The applicant is requesting a relaxation of the requirement to extend the watercourse setback to the edge of any delineated 100-year floodplain and connected wetlands. The applicant proposes to place fill within the 100-year floodplain fringe (i.e., outside the FEMA-defined 100-year floodway) on the south/west side of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the proposed development. In addition, it is proposed to excavate and remove existing soil from the 100-year floodplain fringe west of Lot 6. 19 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 12 of 18 The fill material being removed is an historic artificial fill from an old road or railroad bed, so this area is being mitigated to resemble the previous, historic elevations prior to fill placement. The Applicant proposes to place fill within the wetlands in Lot 4 and in Lots 10, 11 and 12. A 404 permit application is required with the final plat application. The wetlands delineation report can be found under Appendix D of this application. In order to mitigate for the proposed wetland buffer width reductions, there are measures proposed in the Building Design Guidelines to reduce runoff into the sensitive lands (i.e. rain barrels and infiltration facilities) and native grasses will be planting within and along the buffer. The configuration of the development is also intended to create a buffer between the public circulation areas and wildlife refuge areas. Condition of approval number 12 and 13 address the restrictions set on the lots so that no structures can be built within the watercourse setback and the appropriate watercourse plantings are provided. In total, there will be .09 acres of impacts on the wetlands and .41 acres of impacts to the floodplain area. 9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of article 4 and article 6 Wetlands and the East Gallatin River are located adjacent to the site. Code provision number 1 requires a watercourse planting plan with the final PUD. The project proposes to re-plant existing wetland vegetation mats from impacts wetlands into this area. 10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties No public comment has been received to date. 11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title, whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming Not applicable. The site will be divided according to the companion subdivision (20351). 12. Phasing of development Not applicable. The project is proposed to be constructed in one phase. Planned Unit Development Review Criteria, Section 38.430.090.E, BMC. The application presents the applicant’s response to these criteria. In addition to the criteria for all site plan and conditional use reviews, the following criteria will be used in evaluating all planned unit development applications. 20 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 13 of 18 a) All development. All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against, and comply with, the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory "all development" group. (1) Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways, sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Yes. The proposed Bridger Meadows development will be connected to and be served by City utilities. The proposed development is near the proposed public safety center (fire station) and response time is expected to be under 2 minutes. Additionally, the developer looks to enhance and exceed city requirements with respect to creation and dedication of 7.15 acres to wildlife refuge. The streets will be designed and constructed to meet city standards with some relaxations for right of way width and pedestrian facilities, as noted Relaxation request section of this application. Appropriate easements for street construction, utilities, emergency access, and trails are provided. See list of relaxations for additional information on trails, walks, and utility ways, as well as flood hazard areas, streets and for sidewalk along both sides of street. (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Yes. The developer looks to enhance and exceed city requirements by preserving approximately 7.15 acres as a wildlife refuge with woodland and wetland habitat. In addition, the developer plans to incorporate requirements for natural, sustainable, and local vegetation in the development design guidelines. The Design Guidelines will include a list of recommended plant species for all trees, perennials and shrubs that are either Native to the region or adapted to our climate and growing zone. Drought tolerant plants will be recommended for most locations on-site with the exception of wet areas where it will make sense to have plants thattolerate wet roots. Plants will be selected for diversity of size, canopy, color and seasonal interest for both the purposes of providing habitat and visual interest. (3) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes. The applicant has incorporated comments obtained from the City representatives through various meetings held throughout the process. The modifications suggested and discussed with city representatives including placement of the lots, roads, sidewalks, wildlife refuge, and wetlands are incorporated. The project will provide emergency access with Knox pad lock through an easement at Commercial Drive as recommend by the fire department and is addressing floodplain and watercourse setbacks. As noted in this and the original documents, the applicant has worked with adjacent property owners and the City to resolve access and easement issues on this central infill project. In addition, the applicant will establish a maintenance agreement between the HOA and adjacent Owners along the easement to Commercial Drive to maintain the emergency access year- round – both within and outside the property boundary. The site layout accommodates UDC issues 21 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 14 of 18 where applicable and request relaxations where necessary to protect the wetlands and wildlife habitats, provide safe and convenient access and improve the property with respect to the City Community Plan. Relaxations are requested to accommodate existing site conditions imposed on the site by previous development of surrounding properties and provide additional improvements above and beyond the City UDC to create a superior environment, exceed the requirements of the code standards, and create an excellent living environment within the Bozeman community. (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Yes. Design Regulations and Guidelines encourage sustainable design practices. (5) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Yes. The applicant has made adjustments and modifications with respect to lots, roads and trails to better accommodate privacy, efficiency and limit impacts to the overall site including the wetlands. The revisions have taken into account the staff comments and adjustments made accordingly to improve the overall design. The arrangement of the lots and roads are consistent with recommendations and discussions with city representatives and advisors to the project. (6) Park land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by section 38.420.020? Yes. The applicant looks to dedication dedicate over 7.15 (60.2%) of the site to a protected wildlife refuge as well as provide open space and recreational space. This dedicated area exceeds the city requirement per section 38.420.020 and table 38.420.020.A. The required dedication is .03 acres based on the maximum required dedication per acre of 10 Dwellings for R-1 (10 dwellings x .03 acres). The applicant is providing 7.15 acres of wildlife refuge habitat and .52 acres of open space which far exceeds the requirements for even 16 dwellings (16 dwellings x .03) at .48 acres. In addition, the developer will provide a play area and gathering area accessible by trails at the southeast end of the wildlife refuge. The dedication of this property to open space demonstrates Bridger Meadows efforts to create a superior environment, exceed the requirements of the code standards, and create an excellent living environment within the Bozeman community. (7) Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points. Yes. This PUD proposes to use (a) Additional Open Space to earn its 20 performance points based on the open space provided. Between the wildlife refuge, public and non-public open space, and wayfinding signage, a total of 69.71 points are achieved. 22 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 15 of 18 (8) Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? Yes. The development will correct the isolation imposed on this property by decisions made over the years that resulted in very limited access and easement connections to adjacent properties. The applicant has made exemplary efforts to incorporate comments obtained from the City representatives through various meetings. The modifications suggested and discussed with city representatives including placement of the lots, roads, sidewalks, wildlife refuge, and wetlands have been incorporated. The project will provide emergency access swing gate with Knox padlock and will address flood plain and water course setbacks as stated elsewhere in this application. As noted in this and the original documents, the applicant has looked to work with adjacent property owners and the City to resolve access and easement issues. The site layout looks to accommodate UDC issues where applicable and request relaxations where necessary to protect and enhance the wetlands and wildlife habitats, provide safe and convenient access and improve the property with respect to the City Community Plan. Relaxations are requested to accommodate existing site conditions imposed on the lot by previous development of surrounding properties and to provide additional improvements above and beyond the City UDC. b) Residential. Planned unit developments in residential areas (R-S, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, RMH and R-O zoning districts) may include a variety of housing types designed to enhance the natural environmental, conserve energy, recognize, and to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods, with provisions for a mix of limited commercial development. For purposes of this section, "limited commercial development" means uses listed in the B-1 neighborhood service district (article 10 of this chapter), within the parameters set forth below. All uses within the PUD must be sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood. The permitted number of residential dwelling units shall be determined by the provision of and proximity to public services and subject to the following limitations: (1) On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project (calculated for residential portion of the site only) consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the city growth policy? Yes. The development proposes single family detached houses which is an allowed use in the R-1 zone district. It is consistent with the development surrounding the subject property. (2) Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g., private yards, patios and balconies, etc.) for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light, sun, ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Yes. Every lot and/or home has access to private outdoor space. There are common open space lots that will provide pedestrian amenities. 23 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 16 of 18 (3) Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? Yes. As discussed previously, there is ample open space in and around the development and larger neighborhood parks nearby. (4) If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? Not applicable. (5) Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities? Yes. Bridger Meadows is designed and intended to achieve a vibrant infill project while creating a distinct identity and connecting to natural areas and open space. (6) Residential density bonus. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus (30 percent maximum) above the residential density of the zoning district within which the project is located and which is set forth in article 8 of this chapter, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards (such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development? The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus shall be determined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation shall be provided within the project. Those dwellings subject to chapter 10, article 8, shall be excluded in the base density upon which the density bonus is calculated. Not applicable. (7) Limited commercial. If limited commercial development, as defined above, is proposed within the project, is less than 20 percent of the gross area of the PUD designated to be used for offices or neighborhood service activities not ordinarily allowed in the particular residential zoning district? No limited commercial is proposed. (8) Does the overall PUD recognize and, to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? Yes. Bridger Meadows will have its own, unique character reinforced through architecture, site design and circulation. Visual and physical connections to adjacent neighborhoods and shared open space transitions will promote its individuality as well as allow it to blend in with the pattern of the larger neighborhood. Appendix A –Project Site Zoning and Growth Policy Zoning Designation and Land Uses: 24 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 17 of 18 Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan designates the subject property to develop as “Urban Neighborhood.” This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. Applying a zoning district to specific parcels sets the required and allowed density. Higher density residential areas are encouraged to be, but are not required or restricted to, proximity to commercial mixed use areas to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities without requiring the use of a car. Appendix B – Owner Information and Reviewing Staff Owner/Applicant/Representative: Bridger Center LLC, 3701 Tracker Trail, Suite 1B #20, Bozeman, MT, 59718 Report By:Sarah Rosenberg, AICP, Associate Planner Appendix C –Planned Unit Development Intent Sec. 38.430.010. Intent. A. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development (PUD) concept, to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and general welfare, it shall be the intent of this chapter to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: 1. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with the city's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies; 2. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the city area; 3. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities; 4. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks; 5. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage, water quality and reduction of flood damage; 6. To encourage patterns of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation, thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; 7. To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation; 8. To reduce energy consumption and demand; 25 20350 Design Review Board Staff Report for the Bridger Meadows PUD Page 18 of 18 9. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography; 10. To improve the design, quality and character of new development; 11. To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas; 12. To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of incompatible developments; 13. To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer, the neighborhood and the community as a whole; 14. To promote the efficient use of land resources, full use of urban services, mixed uses, transportation options, and detailed and human-scale design; and 15. To meet the purposes established in section 38.01.040. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed digitally at https://www.bozeman.net/government/planning/using-the-planning-map, select the “Project Documents Folder” link and navigate to application #20350, as well as digitally at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Application materials – Available through the Laserfiche archive linked agenda materials and the full file is linked below. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=228054&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN This project can be viewed on the Community Development Viewer interactive map directly with this link: https://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=planning&FILE_NUMBER=20-350 26 Memorandum REPORT TO:Design Review Board FROM:Jacob Miller SUBJECT:21-047, Flanders Mill Apartments Phase II & III; A Site Plan application for the construction of 122 residential units consisting of seven 12-unit buildings, three 6-unit buildings, and five 4-unit buildings. MEETING DATE:June 9, 2021 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:“Having reviewed and considered the application materials, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 21047 and move to recommend approval of the site plan application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions.” STRATEGIC PLAN:4.5 Housing and Transportation Choices: Vigorously encourage, through a wide variety of actions, the development of sustainable and lasting housing options for underserved individuals and families and improve mobility options that accommodate all travel modes. BACKGROUND:The subject property is zoned R-4, residential high-density district, and is located on Windrow Drive. The property is approximately 9 acres and is located in northwest Bozeman in the Flanders Mill subdivision. The applicant is proposing to construct 15 apartment buildings with open space and associated site improvements. Phases II & III will provide 254 parking spaces with the majority of them being on-site and 26 on-street stalls on Windrow Drive. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:Recommend design changes. FISCAL EFFECTS:None determined. Attachments: 21047 Flanders Mill Ph II & II DRB SR.pdf 4-Plex(2-1)_SP2.3ExteriorElevations_01-21-21.pdf 4-Plex(2-2)_SP2.3ExteriorElevations_01-21-21.pdf 6-Plex_SP2.3ExteriorElevations_01-27-2.pdf 12-Plex_SP2.3ExteriorElevations_01-21-21.pdf L101OverallLandscapePlan_12-18-20.pdf C1.1CivilDimensionPlan_02-18-21.pdf 27 Report compiled on: May 19, 2021 28 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 1 of 16 Application No. 21047 Type Site Plan Project Name Flanders Mill Apartments Phase II & III Summary Site Plan application for the construction of 122 residential units consisting of seven 12-unit buildings, three 6-unit buildings, and five 4-unit buildings Zoning R-4 Growth Policy Residential Parcel Size 9.14 acres Overlay District(s) NA Street Address 1555 Windrow Drive, Bozeman , MT 59178 Legal Description Lot 1, Block 25, Flanders Mill Subdivision Phase 7, Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, of P.M.M. City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, Plat J-652 Owner Seven Ox Seven, LLC Applicant Same as owner Representative Chris Budeski, Madison Engineering, 895 Technology Blvd. Suite 203, Bozeman, MT, 59718 Staff Planner Jacob Miller Engineer Lance Lehigh Noticing Public Comment Period Site Posted Adjacent Owners Mailed Newspaper Legal Ad NA NA NA N/A Advisory Boards Board Date Recommendation DRC, DRB DRC – 3/24/21 DRB – 5/26/21 None – Adequacy Determination Recommendation Approval with conditions Decision Authority Director of Community Development Date Full application and file of record: Community Development Department, 20 E. Olive St., Bozeman, MT 59715 29 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 2 of 16 FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPEAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE A) The applicant proposed to the City a Site Plan (SP) to permit the construction of fifteen apartment buildings. The purposes of the Site Plan review were to consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety, welfare, and the other purposes of Ch. 38, BMC; to evaluate the proposal against the criteria of Sec. 38.230.100 BMC, and the standards of Ch. 38, BMC; and to determine whether the application should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. B) It appeared to the Director that all parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed Site Plan and offer comment were provided the opportunity to do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory bodies established by Ch. 38, Art. 210, BMC, and considering all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment period defined by Ch. 38, BMC, the Director has found that the proposed Site Plan would comply with the requirements of the BMC if certain conditions were imposed. Therefore, being fully advised of all matters having come before them regarding this application, the Director makes the following decision. C) The Site Plan has been found to meet the criteria of Ch. 38, BMC, and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listed in this report and the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the Title. The evidence contained in the submittal materials, advisory body review, public testimony, and this report, justifies the conditions imposed on this development to ensure that the Site Plan complies with all applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Ch. 38, BMC. On this ______ day of ________________, 2021, Martin Matsen, Director of Community Development, approved with conditions this Site Plan for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman as authorized by Sec. 38.200.010, BMC. The approval of this Site Plan shall be effective for twelve (12) months from the date of Plan approval, which is the ______ day of __________________, 2022. At the end of this period the Director may, at the request of the developer, extend the approval in accordance with Ch. 38 Art.230, BMC. D) This Director of Community Development’s project decision may be appealed by filing a documented appeal with and paying an appeal fee to the Clerk of the Commission for the City of Bozeman within 10 working days after the date of the final decision as evidenced by the Director’s signature, following the procedures of Sec. 38.250.030, BMC. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. Additional conditions of approval and code corrections are required and will be included with the final report provided to the Director of Community Development Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 30 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 3 of 16 31 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 4 of 16 Figure 1: Zoning and Vicinity Map Figure 2: Growth Policy Map 32 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 5 of 16 Figure 3: Current Land Use 33 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 6 of 16 Figure 4: Site Plan 34 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 7 of 16 35 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 8 of 16 Figures 5-7: Elevations 36 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 9 of 16 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Plan Review, Section 38.230.100, BMC In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the Director of Community Development shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy 38.100.040 B Meets Code? Growth Policy Land Use Residential Yes Zoning R-4 Yes Comments: The uses are allowed within the zoning district. The property is within the City’s municipal service area. Staff finds that the project does contribute to the goals of the growth policy including the following goals and objectives: - Goal N-1.1: Promote housing diversity, including missing middle housing. This project advances this objective by providing a high volume of apartment units with a variety of floor plans. - Goal N-1.10: Increase connectivity between parks and neighborhoods through continued trail and sidewalk development. Prioritize closing gaps within the network. This project advances this objective by providing a trail easement and pedestrian pathway connecting Windrow Dr. and Flanders Mill Rd. 2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations 38.200.160 Meets Code? Current Violations None Yes Comments: There are no current violations on the subject property 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations 38.100.080 Meets Code? Conflicts None NA Condominium ownership NA NA Comments: No specific conflicts identified. The Building Division of the Department of Community Development will review the requirements of the International Building Code for compliance at the time of building permit application. All residential units are proposed as rentals. 4. Conformance with Plan Review for applicable permit types as specified in article 2 Section 38.230 Meets Code? Site Plan Yes Comments: The site plan criteria are met with this project. The proposal is compatible and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods. Architectural design, building mass, 37 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 10 of 16 building materials and character are compatible to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood. 5. Conformance with zoning provisions of article 3 38.320.100 Meets Code? Permitted uses 38.310 Apartments/Apartment buildings Yes Form and intensity standards 38.320 Yes Zoning R-4 Setbacks (feet) Structures Parking / Loading Yes Front 15’ NA Rear 20’ NA Side 5’ NA Alley NA NA Comments: The proposed dwellings are a principle use in R-4 zoning. The proposed setbacks meet the minimum requirement. Relationship to adjacent properties standards 38.520.030 (light and air access and privacy) and angled setback plane 38.360.030 NA Applicable zone specific or overlay standards 38.330-340 NA Building Height Requirements 38.320.010-.060 Yes Lot coverage 21% Allowed 50% Height 4-plex 2-1: 28’ 7 3/8” 4-plex 2-2: 27’ 7 3/8” 6-plex: 37’ 4 9/32” 12-plex: 36’ 6 3/4” Allowed 6:12: 42’ 6:12: 42’ 6:12: 42’ 6:12: 42’ Yes Comments: All residential buildings have a roof pitch of 6:12 and are below the maximum height requirement of 42’. The development will be well below the allowed 50% lot coverage in R-4. General land use standards and requirements 38.350 Yes Comments: All encroachments are in conformance to standards. Yes Applicable supplemental use criteria 38.360 NA Supplemental uses/type None Yes Comments: The proposed development meets general land use standards. Wireless facilities 38.370 NA Affordable Housing 38.380.010 NA NA Affordable housing plan NA Comments: NA rental apartments 6a(1). Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4: Transportation facilities and access 38.400 Meets Code? Street vision Yes Yes Secondary access Yes Traffic Impact Study / LOS No* Transportation grid adequate to serve site Yes Yes Comments: *A traffic study was conducted in 2013 for the subdivision and was determined by engineering to be adequate for this project. Street dedication No Yes Drive access locations and widths Yes 38 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 11 of 16 Number of drive accesses 2 accesses Yes Street easements Yes* Special Improvement Districts (SID) No Yes Comments: No SID’s exist for this parcel. There are two accesses to the property from Windrow Drive and Harvest Parkway and a public access easement has been recorded for the internal roadways. Parking requirements of 38.540 Required parking nonresidential NA Yes Required parking residential 254 Reductions nonresidential NA Reductions residential NA Provided parking off street 239 On street parking 21 Comments: Parking is provided with a combination of on-site and street parking. The difference between the required and proposed parking was provided with phase I. 6a(2). Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4: Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress 38.400 Meets Code? Design of the pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems to assure that pedestrians and vehicles can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area Yes Vehicle accesses to site 2 Yes Pedestrian access location(s) Yes Site vision triangles Yes Fire lanes, curbs, signage and striping Yes Non-automotive transportation and circulation systems, design features to enhance convenience and safety across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lighting Yes Crosswalks Yes Curb ramps Yes Pedestrian lighting Yes Comments: The two vehicular accesses to the site are from Windrow Drive and Harvest Parkway with recorded public access easements for the internal roadways. A dedicated east-west pedestrian pathway and associated right-of-way easement has been recorded that satisfies provision 38.410.040.D. which requires easements to be recorded to “provide circulation or access to parks, open space, schools, playgrounds, shopping centers, transportation, and other community facilities.” Adequate connection and integration of the pedestrian and vehicular transportation systems to the systems in adjacent development and the general community Yes Access easements Yes Yes Dedication of right-of-way or easements necessary for pedestrian, shared use pathway and similar transportation facilities Yes Comments: A dedicated east-west pedestrian pathway and associated right-of-way easement has been recorded that satisfies provision 38.410.040.D. which requires easements to be recorded to “provide circulation or access to parks, open space, schools, playgrounds, shopping centers, transportation, and other community facilities.” 6a(3) Loading and Unloading areas Meets Code? 39 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 12 of 16 Loading and unloading area requirements 38.540.080 NA Loading and unloading NA NA First Berth (min. 70 feet length, 12 feet in width and 14 feet in height) NA NA Additional Berths (min. 45 feet length) NA NA Comments: NA. No off-street loading berths are required for this use. 6b Community design and element provisions 38.410 Meets Code? Lot and block standards 38.410.040 Yes Rights of way for pedestrians alternative block delineation Yes* Comments: A 30’ pedestrian easement has been recorded to connect Windrow Drive to the open space adjacent to Flanders Mill road. Provisions for utilities including efficient public services and utilities 38.410.050-060 Yes Municipal infrastructure requirements Yes Easements (City and public utility rights-of-way etc.) Yes Water, sewer, and stormwater Yes Other utilities (electric, natural gas, communications) Yes CIL of water Yes Comments: The applicant is currently waiting to receive permits for the construction of a footbridge through Open Space ‘U’ which will connect the 30’ pedestrian access easement from Windrow Drive to Flanders Mill Road. See Condition of Approval #2. CILWR has been paid. Site Surface Drainage and stormwater control 38.410.080 Yes Location, design and capacity Yes Landscaping per 38.410.080.H Yes Comments: A stormwater report was provided and approved by Engineering Grading 38.410.080 Yes Maximum 1:4 slope requirements met Yes Comments: Reviewed and approved by Engineering Division 6c. Park and recreation requirements 38.420 Meets Code? Enhancement of natural environment NA Wildlife habitat or feeding area preservation NA Maintenance of public park or public open space access Yes Park/Recreational area design Yes Parkland Cash-in-lieu for maximum known density not to exceed 12 units/acre (ac.). Yes 6.14 ac. X 4 units/ac. X ___ ac.= ___ Cash donation in-lieu(CIL) Yes Yes Improvements in-lieu Yes Yes Comments: Parkland dedication of 12.0862 acres was provided with the Flanders Mill Subdivision 40 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 13 of 16 7a-c. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Compatibility, Design and Arrangement Meets Code? Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to architectural design, building mass, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the site and visual integration Yes Block Frontage Standards 38.510 Yes Building Design 38.530 Yes Location and design of service areas and mechanical equipment 38.520.070 Yes Comments: This property meets the Landscaped and Special Residential block frontage standards. The building designs are compatible with the immediate environment and surrounding neighborhoods. Design and arrangement of the elements of the plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community, neighborhood, and other approved development and produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive development Yes Relationship to adjacent properties 38.520.030 NA Non-motorized circulation and design 38.520.040 Yes Vehicular circulation and parking 38.520.050 Yes Comments: This projects provides adequate pedestrian and vehicular circulation. They exceeded open space requirements by utilizing a combination of balcony spaces, shared open spaces with appropriate amenities, and a clubhouse with a gym and other amenities. A comprehensive landscaping plan was provided that meets code. Design and arrangement of elements of the plan (e.g., buildings circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography, natural water bodies and water courses, existing vegetation, and to contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration Yes Site Planning and Design Elements 38.520 Yes Comments: A watercourse exists on the west side of the property that was rerouted when the subdivision was platted. A variance was granted that allows building encroachment into the 50’ setback due to the substantial mitigation efforts that were implemented during subdivision. A pedestrian pathway with a bridge to cross the watercourse will be constructed with Phase I of this project. The pathway connects to the sidewalk on Flanders Mill road as well. 7d. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Landscaping including the enhancement of buildings, appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian area and the preservation of replacement of natural vegetation Meets Code? Submittal requirements for landscape plans 38.220.100 Yes Mandatory landscaping 38.550.050 Yes Yard Yes Additional screening NA Parking lot screening Yes Interior parking lot landscape Yes Off-street loading spaces screening NA Street frontage Yes Street median island NA Acceptable landscape materials Yes 41 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 14 of 16 7g. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Signage 38.560 Meets Code? Allowed (sq. ft)/building NA Yes Proposed (sq. ft) NA Comments: No signage is proposed. 8a-c. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives in articles 4- 6 Meets Code? Enhancement of natural environment: Integrated stormwater, LID, removal of inappropriate fill Yes Protection of landscape areas Yes Irrigation: plan, water source, system type Yes, well, (sprinkler irrigation) Trees for residential adjacency NA City rights-of-way and parks Yes Tree plantings for boulevard ROW, drought- resistant seed Yes Public ROW boulevard strips Yes Irrigation and maintenance provisions for ROW Yes State ROW landscaping NA Additional NA NA Fencing and walls NA NA Comments: The project proposes boulevard trees and adheres to forestry and UDC requirements. Site planning and design required 38.520 Yes Pedestrian area landscaping, including pathways and internal circulation 38.520.040 Yes Internal roadway landscaping 38.520.050 NA Open space landscaping 38.520.060 Yes Service area and mechanical equipment landscaping and screening 38.520.070 Yes Comments: Project meets requirements. Open space is provided through balconies, shared open space and a clubhouse. Sidewalks, crosswalks and pedestrian access are all provided and include adequate landscaping. 7e. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Open Space Meets Code? Open Space Section 38.520.060 Yes Total required 11,500 sf Yes Total provided 19,309 sf Yes Comments: Balconies, shared open spaces, and a clubhouse are provided. The clubhouse will be constructed during Phase I. 7f. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Lighting 38.570 Meets Code? Building-mounted lighting (cutoff and temperature) Yes Site lighting (supports, cutoff and temperature) NA Minimum light trespass at property line Yes Comments: The proposed building mounted lighting and site lighting meets standards. 42 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 15 of 16 Grading Yes On-site retention/detention Yes Comments: Project meets requirements. Drainage design Yes Stormwater maintenance plan 38.410.030.A Yes Stormwater feature: ADS underground stormwater system Yes Comments: The underground stormwater system provided has been reviewed by engineering and determined to be adequate to handle the stormwater runoff from the project. Watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats Yes If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area Yes Comments: The project has provided additional access to the open space with the watercourse through an alternative pedestrian right-of-way block delineation and public access easement 9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of articles 4-6 Meets Code? Watercourse setback 38.410.100 Yes Watercourse setback planting plan NA Floodplain regulations 38.600 NA Wetland regulations 38.610 NA Comments: The watercourse setback was reconfigured through the subdivision and is located on it’s own lot maintained by the POA. No plantings are required with this project. 10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties 38.220 Meets Code? Public Comment NA Yes Comments: A public notice will be conducted following adequacy. 11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title, whether the lots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming OR Are the subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. 38.410.060 Meets Code? Subdivision exemption NA NA Required Easements NA NA Reciprocal access and shared parking easement NA NA Mutual access easement and agreement NA NA Comments: Not applicable the project is proposed on one lot and will be all rental units. 12. Phasing of development 38.230.020.B including buildings and infrastructure Meets Code? Phasing Yes # of phases 3 Yes 43 Staff Report Flanders Mill Apartments Ph. II & III Site Plan Application 21047 May 19, 2021 Page 16 of 16 Comments: There are three phases proposed. The 30’ pedestrian easement and associated trail will be constructed with Phase I. 44 MTL-1WD-17WD-2WD-11WTE-3WD-1MTL-1MTL-1WD-18WTE-1WD-8MTL-1CIP-1WD-1WD-13MTL-1CIP-1WF-1WTE-2WTE-4WTE-1WTE-3MTL-3MTL-1MTL-1WD-2WD-1WD-2WD-1WD-2WD-1WD-1WD-11WD-11WD-11WTE-3WD-13MTL-1EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL LEGENDACCENT STEEL -DK CHARCOAL GRAYMTL-3CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, WHITEWD-2CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL, SURFACE FASTENEDMTL-1CORTEN STEELMTL-5VERTICAL CHANNEL REAL WOOD SHIP LAP SIDING, STAINED AND SEALEDWD-1CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, WHITEWD-11EXPOSED CONCRETECIP-1CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, SANDSTONE BEIGEWD-18CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, SANDSTONE BEIGEWD-17Any unauthorized reproduction or use of this information without the expressed written consent of Bechtle Architects is a violation of U.S. copyright laws. Copyright © 2020 Bechtle ArchitectsJOB:4515 Valley Commons Drive #201 Bozeman, MT 59718406.585.4161 ph 406.585.6919 faxNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBECHTLEARCHITECTS1/20/2020 2:59:30 PMFLANDERS MILL4-HOUSEHOLD 2-1BOZEMAN, MT1958SP2.3EXTERIORELEVATIONSSITE PLANSUBMITTALJAN. 21, 2020REVISION SCHEDULENo. Description DateSCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"1EAST COLOR -SPSCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"2NORTH COLOR -SPEXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULESYMBOL MATERIAL MANUFACTURER TYPE, COLOR COMMENTSCIP-1 CONCRETE CAST IN PLACEEXPOSED CONICAL FORM TIE REVEALSMTL-1 CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL BRIDGER STEEL 7/8 RIB 24 GA EXPOSED FASTENER, VERTICALORIENTATIONMTL-3 PAINTED STEEL FABRICATION CHARCOAL GREY C-CHANNEL OR OTHER STEELFABRICATIONMTL-5 METAL SIGNAGE CORTEN STEEL PLASMA CUT LETTERINGPCT-1 PRECAST CONCRETE TREADWD-1 1X6 VERTICAL SHIP LAP CEDAR SIDING RANCHWOOD COLOR:MATCH ARCHTECTS SAMPLE 1" REVEAL BETWEEN BOARDSWD-2 CEMENTIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING HARDI SMOOTH FINISH COLOR:WHITEWD-3 TREX DECKING TREX COLOR:WD-11 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5"EXPOSUREHARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: WHITEWD-13 ACCENT TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXXWD-15 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5"EXPOSUREHARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: RICHESPRESSOWD-17 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5"EXPOSUREHARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: SANDSTONEBEIGEWD-18 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5"EXPOSUREHARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: SANDSTONEBEIGEWTE-1 2X4 PAINTED TRIM EXTERIOR MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4WTE-2 PAINTED TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4WTE-3 PAINTED TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4DUE TO THE REPETITION OF UNITS WITHIN THE PROJECT, MULTIPLE COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE USED TO CREATE VARIETY AMONST THE UNITS. THE SANDSTONE BEIGE COMPONENT ON THIS UNIT WILL BE ALTERED TO CREATE THE VARIETY UTILIZING COLORS SUCH AS SAGE GREEN, RICH ESPRESSO, AND WHITEJAN. 27, 20211/27/202145 WTE-3WD-2WD-1WD-1MTL-1MTL-1WD-2WD-1WD-2MTL-1WD-13WTE-1WD-11WD-11WD-11WTE-3WD-1WD-1WD-1WD-13MTL-1WD-12WD-2WTE-3WD-1WD-1MTL-1WD-13CIP-1WD-11WD-10WTE-4WTE-1MTL-3EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL LEGENDACCENT STEEL -DK CHARCOAL GRAYMTL-3CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, SAGE GREENWD-12CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, WHITEWD-2CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL, SURFACE FASTENEDMTL-1CORTEN STEELMTL-5VERTICAL CHANNEL REAL WOOD SHIP LAP SIDING, STAINED AND SEALEDWD-1CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, WHITEWD-11CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, SAGE GREENWD-10EXPOSED CONCRETECIP-1Any unauthorized reproduction or use of this information without the expressed written consent of Bechtle Architects is a violation of U.S. copyright laws. Copyright © 2020 Bechtle ArchitectsJOB:4515 Valley Commons Drive #201 Bozeman, MT 59718406.585.4161 ph 406.585.6919 faxNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBECHTLEARCHITECTS1/20/2020 3:00:48 PMFLANDERS MILL4-HOUSEHOLD 2-2BOZEMAN, MT1958SP2.3EXTERIORELEVATIONSSITE PLANSUBMITTALJAN. 21, 2020REVISION SCHEDULENo. Description DateEXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE - SPSYMBOL MATERIAL MANUFACTURER TYPE, COLOR COMMENTSCIP-1 CONCRETE CAST IN PLACEEXPOSED CONICAL FORM TIEREVEALSMTL-1 CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL BRIDGER STEEL 7/8" RIB 24 GA. EXPOSED FASTENER, VERTICALORIENTATIONMTL-3 PAINTED STEEL FABRICATION CHARCOAL GREY C-CHANNEL OR OTHER STEELFABRICATIONMTL-5 METAL SIGNAGE CORTEN STEEL PLASMA CUT LETTERINGPCT-1 PRECAST CONCRETE TREADWD-1 1X6 VERTICAL T&G CEDAR SIDING RANCHWOOD COLOR: MATCH ARCHITECTS SAMPLE 1" REVEAL BETWEEN BOARDSWD-2 CEMENTIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING HARDI SMOOTH SURFACE FINISH, COLOR: WHITEWD-3 TREX DECKING TREX COLOR:WD-10 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: SAGE GREENWD-11 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: WHITEWD-12 CEMENTIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: SAGE GREENWF-1 STEPPED FASCIA 1X10 WITH 1X4 MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXXWTE-1 2X4 WINDOW TRIM EXTERIOR MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4WTE-3 PAINTED TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: WHITE SW-XXXX 4/4SCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"1NORTH COLOR -SPSCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"2EAST COLOR -SPDUE TO THE REPETITION OF UNITS WITHIN THE PROJECT, MULTIPLE COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE USED TO CREATE VARIETY AMONST THE UNITS. THE SAGE GREEN COMPONENT ON THIS UNIT WILL BE ALTERED TO CREATE THE VARIETY UTILIZING COLORS SUCH AS RICH ESPRESSO, SANDSTONE BEIGE, AND WHITEJAN. 27, 20211/27/202146 WD-5 WTE-1 WD-1 WD-12 WD-1 WD-5 WD-1WD-1 MTL-1 MTL-1 WD-10 WD-1 WD-1 MTL-1 WD-13 WTE-1 WTE-1 WTE-2 MTL-1 WD-5 WTE-1WD-1 WD-1WTE-3 WD-2 WD-7 WF-1 MTL-1 CIP-1 WD-11 WTE-4 EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL LEGEND ACCENT STEEL -DK CHARCOAL GRAY MTL-3 CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, SAGE GREEN WD-12 CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, WHITE WD-2 CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL, SURFACE FASTENED MTL-1 CORTEN STEEL MTL-5 VERTICAL CHANNEL REAL WOOD SHIP LAP SIDING, STAINED AND SEALED WD-1 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, WHITE WD-11 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, SAGE GREEN WD-10 EXPOSED CONCRETE CIP-1 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, WOODSTOCK BROWN WD-5 Any unauthorized reproduction or use of this information without the expressed written consent of Bechtle Architects is a violation of U.S. copyright laws. Copyright © 2020 Bechtle ArchitectsJOB:4515 Valley Commons Drive #201 Bozeman, MT 59718406.585.4161 ph 406.585.6919 faxN O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N BECHTLEARCHITECTS1/20/2020 3:21:12 PMFLANDERS MILL6-HOUSEHOLDBOZEMAN, MT1958 SP2.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL JAN. 27, 2020 REVISION SCHEDULE No. Description Date SCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTH COLOR -SP SCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"2 EAST COLOR -SP EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE - SP SYMBOL MATERIAL MANUFACTURER TYPE, COLOR COMMENTS CIP-1 CONCRETE CAST IN PLACE EXPOSED CONICAL FORM TIE REVEALS MTL-1 CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL BRIDGER STEEL 7/8 RIB 24 GA EXPOSED FASTENER, VERTICAL ORIENTATION MTL-3 PAINTED STEEL FABRICATION CHARCOAL GREY C-CHANNEL OR OTHER STEEL FABRICATION MTL-5 METAL SIGNAGE CORTEN STEEL PLASMA CUT LETTERING PCT-1 PRECAST CONCRETE TREAD WD-1 1X6 VERTICAL SHIP LAP CEDAR SIDING RANCHWOOD COLOR: MATCH ARCHITECTS SAMPLE 1" REVEAL BETWEEN BOARDS WD-2 CEMENTIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: WHITE WD-3 TREX DECKING TREX COLOR: WD-5 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: WOODSTOCK BROWN WD-10 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: SAGE GREEN WD-11 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: WHITE WD-12 CEMENTIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING HARDI SMOOTH FINISH, COLOR: SAGE GREEN WD-13 ACCENT TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4 WF-1 STEPPED FASCIA 1X10 WITH 1X4 MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX WTE-1 2X4 PAINTED TRIM EXTERIOR MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4 WTE-3 PAINTED TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4 DUE TO THE REPETITION OF UNITS WITHIN THE PROJECT, MULTIPLE COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE USED TO CREATE VARIETY AMONST THE UNITS. THE SAGE GREEN COMPONENT ON THIS UNIT WILL BE ALTERED TO CREATE THE VARIETY UTILIZING COLORS SUCH AS RICH ESPRESSO, SANDSTONE BEIGE, AND WHITE JAN. 27, 2021 1/27/202147 WD-13 WD-2 WD-5WTE-3 WD-1 WD-5 WD-15 WD-1WTE-1 WD-1 MTL-1 WTE-1 WTE-1 MTL-3 MTL-5 WF-1 MTL-1 WD-1WD-1 WD-15 WTE-1 WD-1 WD-2 WD-1 WD-2 WD-13 MTL-1 MTL-1 WD-13 WD-14 WTE-1 WTE-3 WTE-1 MTL-1 WF-1 EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL LEGEND ACCENT STEEL -DK CHARCOAL GRAY MTL-3 CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, ESPRESSO WD-15 CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, WHITE WD-2 CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL, SURFACE FASTENED MTL-1 CORTEN STEEL MTL-5 VERTICAL CHANNEL REAL WOOD SHIP LAP SIDING, STAINED AND SEALED WD-1 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, WHITE WD-11 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, ESPRESSO WD-14 EXPOSED CONCRETE CIP-1 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING, WOODSTOCK BROWN WD-5 Any unauthorized reproduction or use of this information without the expressed written consent of Bechtle Architects is a violation of U.S. copyright laws. Copyright © 2020 Bechtle ArchitectsJOB:4515 Valley Commons Drive #201 Bozeman, MT 59718406.585.4161 ph 406.585.6919 faxN O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N BECHTLEARCHITECTS1/20/2020 3:15:31 PMFLANDERS MILL12-HOUSEHOLDBOZEMAN, MT1958 SP2.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL JAN. 21, 2020 REVISION SCHEDULE No. Description Date SCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTH COLOR -SP SCALE:3/16" = 1'-0"2 EAST COLOR -SP EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE - SP SYMBOL MATERIAL MANUFACTU RER TYPE, COLOR COMMENTS CIP-1 CONCRETE CAST IN PLACE EXPOSED CONICAL FORM TIE REVEALS MTL-1 CORRUGATED BONDERIZED METAL BRIDGER STEEL 7/8" RIB 24 GA. EXPOSED FASTENER, VERTICAL ORIENTATION MTL-3 PAINTED STEEL FABRICATION CHARCOAL GREY C-CHANNEL OR OTHER STEEL FABRICATION MTL-5 METAL SIGNAGE CORTEN STEEL PLASMA CUT LETTERING PCT-1 PRECAST CONCRETE TREAD WD-1 1X6 VERTICAL SHIP LAP CEDAR SIDING RANCHWOOD COLOR: MATCH ARCHITECTS SAMPLE 1" REVEAL BETWEEN BOARDS WD-2 CEMENTIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING HARDI SMOOTH SURFACE FINISH, COLOR: WHITE WD-5 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH SURFACE FINISH, COLOR: WOODSTOCK BROWN WD-8 TREX COMPOSITE DECKING TREX COLOR: WD-11 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH SURFACE FINISH, COLOR: WHITE WD-14 HORIZONTAL CEMENTIOUS LAP SIDING 5" EXPOSURE HARDI SMOOTH SURFACE FINISH, COLOR: RICH ESPRESSO WD-15 CEMENTIOUS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING HARDI SMOOTH SURFACE FINISH, COLOR: RICH ESPRESSO WF-1 STEPPED FASCIA 1X10 WITH 1X4 MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: WHITE WTE-1 2X4 WINDOW TRIM EXTERIOR MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4 WTE-2 PAINTED TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: SW-XXXX 4/4 WTE-3 PAINTED TRIM MIRATEC PAINT COLOR: WHITE SW-XXXX 4/4 DUE TO THE REPETITION OF UNITS WITHIN THE PROJECT, MULTIPLE COLOR SCHEMES WILL BE USED TO CREATE VARIETY AMONST THE UNITS. THE RICH ESPRESSO COMPONENT ON THIS UNIT WILL BE ALTERED TO CREATE THE VARIETY UTILIZING COLORS SUCH AS SAGE GREEN, SANDSTONE BEIGE, AND WHITE JAN. 27, 2021 1/27/202148 UPUPUPUPUPM. BEDROOMDININGLIVINGLIVINGDININGM. BEDROOMBEDROOMENTRYKITCHENKITCHENENTRYLAUNDRY/ UTILITYLAUNDRY/ UTILITYBEDROOMWATER RME100M. BEDROOMDININGLIVINGLIVINGDININGM. BEDROOMBEDROOMENTRYKITCHENKITCHENENTRYLAUNDRY/ UTILITYLAUNDRY/ UTILITYBEDROOMWATER RME100UPUP4740474047404740474047354735 473547354 7 4 0 47 4 0 4740473547354735 4735 M. BEDROOMDININGLIVINGLIVINGDININGM. BEDROOMBEDROOMENTRYKITCHENKITCHENENTRYLAUNDRY/ UTILITYLAUNDRY/ UTILITYBEDROOMWATER RME100GENERAL NOTES1.ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL HAVE PERMANENT UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION INSTALLED TO ENSURE A HEALTHY LANDSCAPE.2.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO BE SEEDED OR PLANTED ANDMAINTAINED.3.ALL EDGING SHALL BE METAL (PRO EDGE-STEEL/ALUMINUM)4.ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE LINED WITH PROFESSIONAL GRADE TYPAR WEEDFABRIC, AND COVERED WITH 3-4" OF 1 12" WASHED ROCK MATERIAL5.ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED WITH WOOD STAKES (MIN OF 2 PER TREE) ANYTREE OR SHRUB PLANTED THAT IS NOT IN A SHRUB BED SHALL HAVE A 3' DIA. 4" DEPTH ORGANIC MULCH RING AT THE BASE.6.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION,EXCAVATION, OR PLANTING.7.NO TREE SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF ANY FIRE HYDRANT, SEWER ORWATER LINE.8.ALL STREET TREES SHALL BE APPROVED BY CITY FORESTER AND PLANTEDSLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN GRADE AND WITH THE TREE COLLAR EXPOSED. THE HOLEEXCAVATED SHALL BE TWICE THE SIZE OF THE POT OR ROOTBALL OF THE TREE.9.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION.10.ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE LOCALLY GROWN SOD11.ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE SHALL BE RE-GRADED ROCK HOUNDEDAND SEEDED TO MATCH DISTURBED AREA EXISTING LANDSCAPE12.NO PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER ANDLANDSCAPE DESIGNER13.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL PLANT QUANTITIES. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCYBETWEEN PLANT TABLE AND PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL DICTATE QUANTITY.14.ALL GROUND MOUNTED MECHANICAL NOT SHOWN ON PLAN SHALL BE HARDSCREENED WITH FENCE OR SIDING MATERIAL15.OWNERSHIP INTENDS TO HAUL SNOW OFF SITE WHEN NECESSARY.BOZEMAN U.D.O. REQUIREMENTSPARKING LOT LANDSCAPINGTOTAL PARKING STALLS: 227 LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED: 4540 SF;5283 SF SHOWN25 PARKING LOT TREES REQUIRED, 32 SHOWNBOULEVARD TREES:1 LARGE CANOPY TREE PROVIDED FOR EACH 50' OF STREET FRONTAGERESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY:1 LARGE CANOPY TREE PROVIDED FOR EACH 50' OF ADJACENCY75% OF TREES AND SHRUBS ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES~ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE SHOWN TO ENHANCE THE VISUAL APPEAL OF THEPROJECTOWNERHOMELAND DEVELOPMENT235 GREENHILLS RANCH ROADBOZEMAN, MT 59718406-595-5587LEGALLOT 1 BLOCK 25 FLANDERS MILL SUBDIVISION, PHASE 7, LOCATED IN SECTION3, T.2.S., R.5.E. P.M.M. CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, STATE OFMONTANA IRRIGATION GENERAL NOTES1.THIS IRRIGATION PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND FINAL DESIGN SHALLBE VERIFIED BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BEDESIGN/BUILD BY A PROFESSIONAL IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR PER THEREQUIREMENTS BELOW.2.A BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE PROFESSIONALLY INSTALLED AS PER THECITY OF BOZEMAN REQUIREMENTS3.A PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE/REGULATOR MAY BE NEEDED DEPENDING ON THE PSI AT POINT OF CONNECTION4.IRRIGATION POC WILL BE CONNECTED TO CITY SERVICE5.IRRIGATION DESIGN ASSUMES 25-28GPM FROM WATER SOURCE6.CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS INSTALLEDPROPERLY TO MINIMIZE/ELIMINATE WATER WASTE DUE TO OVER SPRAY ONTOWALKS AND PARKING LOTS.7.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A RAINBIRD (OR SIMILAR) RAINSENSOR THAT WILL AUTOMATICALLY TURN OFF THE SYSTEM DURING RAINEVENTS8.POWER SOURCE TO BE PROVIDED FOR IRRIGATION CONTROLLER ANDCOORDINATED WITH ELECTRICAL.9.ALL TURF AREAS ARE TO BE SPRAY OR ROTOR IRRIGATED. MPR NOZZLES ORSIMILAR SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LAWN AREAS WHERE FEASIBLE TO MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED WITH HEAD TOHEAD COVERAGE FOR ALL ROTOR AND SPRAY ZONES.10.ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIP IRRIGATION. HIGH EFFICIENCYIRRIGATION DRIP ZONES SHALL HAVE 5 GALLON EMITTERS TO TREES, 2GALLON EMITTERS TO ALL SHRUBS, AND 1 GALLON EMITTERS TO ALLPERENNIALS AND GRASSES. ANY TREES OR SHRUBS OUTSIDE BEDS ORLAWN AREAS (IN NATIVE GRASS) ARE TO RECEIVE DRIP IRRIGATION.11.ON THE NORTH SIDES OF STRUCTURES OR HEAVY CLAY SOILS, CARE SHALLBE TAKEN TO MINIMIZE OVER WATERING DEPENDING ON SOIL CONDITIONS AND THE SIZE OF EMITTER MAY BE REDUCEDIRRIGATION CALCULATIONS~THIS ESTIMATE ASSUMES THE SPRINKLER CONTROLLER IS PROGRAMMEDCORRECTLY AND ASSUMES A 3 TIME A WEEK IRRIGATION SCHEDULE~TOTAL ESTIMATED 73,478 GALLONS OF WATER PER MONTH (30,616 SF. TURFAREA) USED FOR ALL SPRAY/LAWN ZONES.~TOTAL ESTIMATED 8,560 GALLONS OF WATER PER MONTH USED IN THE DRIPZONES FOR THE TREES/SHRUBS PERENNIALS AND GRASSES.TOTAL ESTIMATED WATER USAGE PER MONTH FOR LANDSCAPE:82,038 GALLONSNProject For: Flanders Mill Apartments-PH 2 1555 Windrow Drive Bozeman, MTOverallLandscapePlanL101SCALE: 1"=30'-0"Date Issue3084 Thorpe RoadBelgrade, Montana 59714Ph 406.924.8038chad@redbarnmontana.comSHEET L102PHASE 1PHASE II12/18/20City SubmittalPHASE 1SHEET L104SHEET L105SHEET L103WINDROW DRIVESHEET L102SHEET L104SHEET L103SHEET L105PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE49 50 Memorandum REPORT TO:Design Review Board FROM:Danielle Garber SUBJECT:One11 2.0 Site Plan and Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) with Demolitions (DEM), Application 20456 MEETING DATE:June 9, 2021 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20456 and move to recommend approval of the site plan application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:An addition to the constructed One 11 building for 67 new residential units with a shared lobby, bike and ski storage room, structured parking that will connect to One 11 1.0, and shared common open space in the courtyard on level 2. Additional surface parking is also proposed in the adjacent lot to the southwest with access, landscaping, striping and other improvements. To facilitate this additional surface parking lot, the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building at 206 N. Grand Ave., the existing concrete, asphalt parking area, and some vegetation. The subject property is within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) and located on two parcels two blocks north of Main Street southwest of the corner of North Willson Avenue and East Beall Street and northeast of the corner of West Lame Street and North Grand Avenue. The subject property is not within a historic district. All street frontages are designated Mixed Block Frontage. The applicant has specified Mixed-Storefront along N. Willson, and a portion of W. Beall, with the remainder of the W. Beall frontage specified Mixed- Landscaped where ground level residential units are present. The applicant has requested a departure from the minimum 10-foot required setback for Mixed-landscaped frontages utilizing the departure criteria for Special Residential transition elements detailed in this report. An additional departure is proposed to the Mixed-Landscaped frontage along West Lamme Street where only 6-feet of landscape buffer is proposed to screen the parking lot from Lamme, instead of 10-feet. Staff supports both departures, 51 UNRESOLVED ISSUES:Design revisions in response to staff comments and Code Provisions were received April 14, 2021 and an adequacy letter was issued on May 19, 2021 with further corrections. Remaining code corrections from Planning and Engineering staff are detailed in this report. ALTERNATIVES:None FISCAL EFFECTS:NA Attachments: 20456 DRB Staff Report.pdf ArchitecturalSitePlan Level 1 FloorPlan Level 2 FloorPlan Level 3 - 5 FloorPlan Level 6 FloorPlan Roof Plan BuildingElevations Building Elevations PerspectiveViews DemolitionExhibit Existing Conditions Civil Site Plan Landscape Plan Report compiled on: June 3, 2021 52 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 1 of 22 Application No. 20456 Type Site Plan, Certificate of Appropriateness, Demolition Project Name One 11 2.0 Summary An addition to the constructed One 11 building for 67 new units with a shared lobby, bike/ski storage, structured parking that will connect to One 11 1.0, and share a common open space courtyard on level 2. Additional surface parking is also proposed in the adjacent lot to the southwest with access, landscaping, striping and other improvements. The project site is zoned B-3, Downtown District. Zoning B-3 Growth Policy Traditional Core Parcel Size Lot A, Block B, Tracy’s 3rd = 0.42 Acres (18,296 SF) Lots 8-10, Block B, Tracy’s 3rd = 0.27 Acres (11,296 SF) Overlay District(s) Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Street Address 110 W. Beall Street and 206 N. Grand Avenue Legal Description Tracy’s 3rd Add, S07, T02 S, R06 E, Block B, Lot A, PLAT J-198 and Tracy’s 3rd Add, S07, T02 S, R06 E, Block B, Lot 8 – 10 City Of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana Owner WL-HB 111 Lofts Owner II, LLC, 20 N. Tracy Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant HomeBase Partners, 20 N. Tracy Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representative SMA Architects, 109 E Oak Street, Suite 2E, Bozeman, MT 59715 Staff Planner Danielle Garber Engineer Karl Johnson Noticing Public Comment Period Site Posted Adjacent Owners Mailed Newspaper Legal Ad NA NA NA NA Advisory Boards Board Date Recommendation DRC May 19, 2021 None, Adequacy Determination DRB June 6, 2021 TBD Recommendation Application is sufficient for approval with conditions and code provisions. Decision Authority Director of Community Development Date TBD Full application: https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=233808&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN Motion: “Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20456 and move to recommend approval of the site plan application subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions.” Unresolved Issues: Design revisions in response to staff comments and Code Provisions were received April 14, 2021 and an adequacy letter was issued on May 19, 2021 with further corrections. Remaining code corrections from Planning and Engineering staff are detailed below. 53 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 2 of 22 PROJECT SUMMARY The subject property is within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) and located on two parcels two blocks north of Main Street southwest of the corner of North Willson Avenue and East Beall Street and northeast of the corner of West Lame Street and North Grand Avenue. The subject property is not within a historic district. An addition to the constructed One 11 building for 67 new units with a shared lobby, bike and ski storage room, structured parking that will connect to One 11 1.0, and shared common open space in the courtyard on level 2. Additional surface parking is also proposed in the adjacent lot to the southwest with access, landscaping, striping and other improvements. To facilitate this additional surface parking lot, the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building at 206 N. Grand Ave., the existing concrete, asphalt parking area, and some vegetation. Demolition is detailed on page 16 of this report. Exterior materials for the proposed building addition are to match the materials of the constructed One 11 building and include brick veneer, prefinished corrugated metal siding, and CMU. All street frontages are designated Mixed Block Frontage. The applicant has specified Mixed-Storefront along N. Willson, and a portion of W. Beall, with the remainder of the W. Beall frontage specified Mixed-Landscaped where ground level residential units are present. The applicant has requested a departure from the minimum 10-foot required setback for Mixed-landscaped frontages utilizing the departure criteria for Special Residential transition elements detailed below on page 7. An additional departure is proposed to the Mixed-Landscaped frontage along West Lamme Street where only 6-feet of landscape buffer is proposed to screen the parking lot from Lamme, instead of 10-feet. Staff supports both departures, however code provision 5 details landscaping criteria that still needs to be met for the departure along Lamme. This project is within the North Central Master Site Plan currently in review with Community Development. Condition of approval 3 requires the master site plan be approved prior to final site plan approval for this project. With the addition of the surface parking lot propos al on Lamme and Grand, this project is not proposed to utilize any of the structured parking to be constructed with any phase of the master site plan, however the project will be integrated into the streetscape design and property owners association for North Central. Administrative Design Review (ADR) has reviewed the design of the proposed residential building and found the plans do comply with the standards and intent of NCOD Design Guidelines. The following report reviews how the proposal complies with Plan Review Criteria, the Growth Policy, Zoning Standards, Engineering Standards, the NCOD Design Guidelines and the Certificate of appropriateness criteria (COA) with the current conditions of approval and code provisions. The DRB is required to review all of the Plan Review Criteria. Pursuant to section 38.340.020, the Design Review Board (DRB) authority; development applications located within the overlay district for a project of this size and intensity. The DRB is required to make a recommendation to the Director on this application. The Design Review Board meeting will occur at online via Webex at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday June 9, 2021. Public comment will commence upon adequacy of the application and the Director of Community Development will make the final decision on this application after the public comment period is closed. EXISTING CONDITIONS The parcel for the One11 2.0 addition, 110 W. Beall Street, is currently a parking lot with 47 spaces that was constructed in 1988. The parcel for the surface parking lot, 206 N. Grand, currently contains a parking lot, drive access and a one and a half story commercial structure constructed in 1974 according to the 1984 survey. The structure is not contributing, and non-eligible for historic status due to “change in original design and materials.” Several mature trees exist on the property. The demolition plan shows all existing trees to be removed; however, there is a discrepancy between the landscaping plan and the architectural demolition plan. Code provision 6 requires clarification if the mature trees in the boulevard right of way along West Lamme are to be preserved or demolished. Staff recommends preservation of the mature trees where possible. The criteria for demolition or movement of a historic structure within the NCOD is at the end of this staff report. 54 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 3 of 22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. Additional conditions of approval and code corrections are required and will be included with the final report provided to the Director of Community Development Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. The amended plat aggregating the two underlying lots must be approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval. 3. The master site plan must be approved prior to final site plan approval. 4. The non-conforming projecting sign present on the One 11 1.0 building will need to be removed prior to occupancy. 5. Approval of the cash-in-lieu of parkland request and payment is required prior to final site plan approval. 6. The applicant must provide documentation that the cash-in-lieu of water rights amount has been approved and pay the approved amount prior to site plan approval. 7. Infrastructure plans must be submitted to the Engineering Department for review prior to construction. 8. Those which may be identified by the DRB as recommended conditions. CODE PROVISIONS 1. Section 38.510.030.D, residential buildings at least 15% of the entire façade facing the street. Revise the transparency calculations provided on the elevation sheets to reflect the 15% standard for residential buildings for the Mixed-Landscaped portion of the façade. This is not reflected on the elevation sheets. 2. Section 38.510.030.D, staff agrees with the applicant on the parking location requirement due to BMC 38.510.020 which establishes a hierarchy for multiple frontage situations and allows a primary frontage to be chosen based on this hierarchy. The standard does not permit the applicant to count the frontage percentage as 21% using all frontages. Revise the application removing this statement. 3. Section 38.510.030.D, a departure has been requested from the 10-foot required landscaping buffer to screen parking lots. Staff supports this departure for the reasons stated in the application provided the mature width and height of plantings meet the landscaping section BMC 38.550.050. See comment #5 below. 4. Section 38.530.070, untreated blank walls visible from a public street, pedestrian-oriented space, common usable open space, or pedestrian pathway are prohibited. Show blank wall treatments described in the narrative on the existing and proposed building on the elevations and in a detail. Blank walls are present on the west and south elevations. 5. Section 38.550.050.C, the parking lot screening required in this section must be continues and not less than 4-feet in width, and 6-feet in height where not in a vision triangle. The shrubs proposed both have a max height of 1.5-2 feet and do not meet the requirements of this section. 6. Section 38.550.050.E, the landscaping plan shows the boulevard trees being removed in the boulevard planting strip along Lamme, but the demo plan does not. Clarify if these trees are to be retained or removed. At least one street tree is required on this frontage. 55 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 4 of 22 7. Section 38.410.060, front setback utility easements must be ten feet wide, and must always be provided unless written confirmation is submitted to the community development department from all utility companies providing service indicating that front setback easements are not needed. 8. DSSP V.D, permanent structures or significant landscaping may not encroach on utility easements or be within 10 feet of utility mains and services. 9. DSSP V.6.g, the applicant is proposing to connect to the existing fire and water service from the existing One 11 building. The applicant must provide pipe location and meter sizes from the main to the new addition to the building and calculations that show the existing fire and water service lines have capacity to support the additional use. 10. DSSP V.6.h, water and sewer services for the existing structure proposed to be demolished must be abandoned at the main. 11. Section 38.220.080, Traffic Impact Study (TIS): a. The TIS must analyze the existing condition and future impacts on the North Wilson Avenue corridor. Including the intersection of Wilson and Peach. b. The TIS must show trip distribution on to adjacent and nearby local streets and analyze the local intersections to determine if additional traffic control devices will be necessary. c. The TIS must be updated to address the addition of the proposed surface lot. d. The TIS is written for the whole North Central Master Site Plan. Further clarification requested with the site plan response letter will be provided prior to the master site plan revision. 12. The applicant is encouraged to make the following corrections to the proposed traffic circle. a. Taper the curb instead of the proposed abrupt 90-degree vertical angle. b. Raise the center of the circle to 6” above asphalt. c. Install chevron directional signs or round-a-bout signage on all four legs of the traffic circle. d. Mark the curb with yellow epoxy paint. Advisory Comments 1. The applicant may be required to televise the sewer main pipe to verify the condition prior to connection. 56 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 5 of 22 Figure 1: Current Zoning & Vicinity Map 57 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 6 of 22 Figure 2: Existing Conditions 58 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 7 of 22 Figure 3-4: Proposed site plan architecture and civil 59 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 8 of 22 Figure 5: Landscaping Plan 60 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 9 of 22 61 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 10 of 22 Figure 6-7: First and Second Floor Plans 62 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 11 of 22 63 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 12 of 22 64 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 13 of 22 Figures 8-12: Elevations and Renderings 65 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 14 of 22 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Plan Review, Section 38.230.100, BMC In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the Director of Community Development shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy 38.100.040 B Meets Code? Growth Policy Land Use Traditional Core Yes Zoning B-3, Downtown Business District Yes Comments: The uses are allowed within the zoning district. The property is within the City’s municipal service area. The project is an infill redevelopment at urban density. Staff finds that the project does contribute to the goals of the growth policy including the following:  The traditional core of Bozeman is Downtown. This area exemplifies high quality urban design including an active streetscape supported by a mix of uses on multiple floors, a high level of walkability, and a rich architectural and local character. Additionally, essential government services and flexible spaces for events and festivals support opportunities for civic and social engagement. The intensity of development in this district is high with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) well over 1. As Bozeman grows, continued evolution is necessary for long-term resilience. Challenges do exist, particularly around keeping local identity intact, balancing growth sensitively, and welcoming more transportation modes and residents. Underdevelopment and a lack of flexibility can threaten the viability of the land use designation. Future development should be intense while providing areas of transition to adjacent neighborhoods and preserving the character of the Main Street Historic District through context-sensitive development. This project meets the definition of the Traditional Core by providing residential development intensity in the B-3 district to help support a vibrant downtown in an underutilized transition area between commercial and residential areas. Infill is prioritized in the 2020 Community Plan to prevent sprawl and increase resource efficiency.  Goal DCD-2: Encourage growth throughout the City, while enhancing the pattern of community development oriented on centers of employment and activity. Support an increase in development intensity within developed areas. This project meets the stated development intensity desired for the traditional core and is oriented around the downtown commercial center  Goal M-1.1: Prioritize mixed-use land use patterns. Encourage and enable the development of housing, jobs, and services in close proximity to one another. As stated above this project proposes to provide housing in close proximity to jobs and services within the existing mixed-use land patterns of the City’s core. 2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations 38.200.160 Meets Code? Current Violations 38.560.060 – Signs permitted upon the issuance of a sign permit. No Comments: A sign on the existing One 11 building does not conform to BMC 38.560.060. A projecting sign not meeting size requirements for the B-3 District and must be removed prior to occupancy as required by condition of approval 4. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations 38.100.080 Meets Code? 66 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 15 of 22 Conflicts None Yes Condominium ownership NA NA Comments: The proposed uses of the site are consistent with the allowed uses of the B-3 district. No specific conflicts identified. Additional steps will be required including but not limited to completion of conditions of approval and code provisions, final payment for cash in lieu of water rights and cash in lieu of parkland, recordation of the amended plat aggregating all lots in Block B of Tracy’s Third Addition, review of infrastructure, approval of the master site plan, and approval of building permits. The Building Division of the Department of Community Development will review the requirements of the International Building Code for compliance at the time of building permit application. 4. Conformance with Plan Review for applicable permit types as specified in article 2 Section 38.230 Meets Code? Site Plan & Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) Yes Comments: The site plan and COA criteria are met with this project. The proposal is compatible and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods. Architectural design, building mass, building materials and character are compatible to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood. Further analysis on this is in Section 13, NCOD Design Guidelines. 5. Conformance with zoning provisions of article 3 38.320.100 Meets Code? Permitted uses 38.310 Apartment Building Yes Form and intensity standards 38.320 Yes Zoning B-3 Setbacks (feet) Structures Parking / Loading Yes Front Block Frontage: Mixed- Storefront & Mixed- Landscaped Block Frontages Block Frontage: Mixed- Storefront & Mixed- Landscaped Block Frontages Rear 0 0 Side 0 0 Alley NA NA Comments: The proposed setbacks meet all B-3 zone district standards. The application responds to two different block frontage designations requested by the applicant. Mixed-Storefront along N. Willson Ave. and 70-feet of W. Beall St., and Mixed-Landscaped along 164-feet of W. Beall, N. Grand, and a portion of W. Lamme. Entrances for three ground level residential units are proposed along the 164-feet of the Beall St. façade. A departure is requested from the Mixed-Landscaped block frontage building placement requirement of a minimum 10-foot setback along W. Beall. As an alternative to the 10-foot front building setback, the applicant has proposed transition elements between the public right of way and the private residential units according to the raised deck or porch option in the special residential standards in Section 38.510.030.J. According to this standard, the raised porch provided must be at least 60 square feet in area, at least 1-foot above grade, and be at least 6-feet deep. A low fence, rail, or hedge, two feet to four feet high, may be integrated between the sidewalk or internal pathway and deck or porch. The applicant is proposing three raised porches, two are 60 SF, and one is 70 SF. The porches are proposed to be raised 3-feet from the sidewalk and stoop railings to match the upper level balcony railings are to be provided. Staff supports this departure. Relationship to adjacent properties standards 38.520.030 (light and air access and privacy) and angled setback plane 38.360.030 NA Applicable zone specific or overlay standards 38.330-340 Yes Building Height Requirements 38.320.010-.060 Yes 67 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 16 of 22 Lot coverage 94% Allowed 100% Height 70’ Allowed 70’ Yes Comments: The proposed building meets B-3 height standards, with allowable encroachments. The lot coverage metric of 94% is just for Lot A, Block B. After lot aggregation, the lot coverage number will be less due to the addition of the surface parking area. The Zone edge transitions, based off Section 38.320.060, and relationship to adjacent properties standards in Section 38.320.030 do not apply since the subject property is surround by B-3 zoning and shares no rear or side lot lines. Overlay District Standards (NCOD) 38.340 Yes Comments: See Section 13 below for NCOD analysis General land use standards and requirements 38.350 Yes Comments: Project meets all applicable standards of 38.350 including permitted height encroachments, which allows parapet walls extending no more than 4-feet above the limiting height of the building. Applicable supplemental use criteria 38.360 NA Supplemental uses/type None NA Comments: No supplemental uses are applicable to this project. Wireless facilities 38.370 NA Affordable Housing 38.380.010 NA NA Affordable housing plan NA Comments: NA 6a(1). Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4: Transportation facilities and access 38.400 Meets Code? Street vision Yes Yes Secondary access Yes Traffic Impact Study / LOS Yes Transportation grid adequate to serve site TBD TBD Comments: A TIS cannot be fully evaluated by the Engineering Division until code provision #11 is satisfied. Three new drive accesses are proposed off North Grand Ave, one for the parking garage exit, and two for the new surface parking lot. A deviation has been requested from Engineering for drive access spacing and is supported by the City Engineer. This design adds a traffic-calming circle at the Lamme and N. Grand intersection. This review was based on traffic volumes, turning movements, traffic controls, site design, sign distances, and location and alignment of other access points. Street dedication NA Yes Drive access locations and widths Yes Number of drive accesses 3 Yes Street easements NA Special Improvement Districts No Yes Comments: See above comments regarding transportation and drive accesses. Parking requirements of 38.540 Required parking nonresidential 2 Yes Required parking residential 105 Reductions nonresidential – B-3 20% Office Reductions – parking structure NA Reductions – transit availability 10% Provided parking off street 93 On street parking 16 68 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 17 of 22 Comments: Shared circulation and parking between the existing structured parking at One 11 and this project is proposed. A total of 122 units are proposed with this addition, requiring 122 parking spaces. The transit availability reduction of 10% may be applied requiring 109 residential spaces. A car share program has been established with the One 11 project, reducing the requirement by 4 spaces to 105. Commercial uses in the One 11 project bring the total to 107 spaces with two spaces required for office uses. 93 spaces are to be provided within proposed structured and surface lots, 16 on-street spaces are proposed along W. Beall and W. Lamme for a total of 109 spaces. Bicycle parking is proposed in wall mounted bike racks within the building both in the storage room and within the parking garage. 40 bicycle parking spaces are to be provided, 13 are required. The bike and ski storage room can be accessed from the parking garage and W. Beall street directly. 6a(2). Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4: Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress 38.400 Meets Code? Design of the pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems to assure that pedestrians and vehicles can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area Yes Vehicle accesses to site 3 new, 4 overall. Yes Pedestrian access location(s) Yes Site vision triangles Yes Fire lanes, curbs, signage and striping Yes Non-automotive transportation and circulation systems, design features to enhance convenience and safety across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lighting Yes Crosswalks NA Curb ramps Yes Pedestrian lighting Yes Comments: The building will connect to the public pedestrian system along its street frontages. The main entry for the proposed building from the sidewalk is located at the corner of W. Beall St and N. Willson. Two additional common entrances from the sidewalk are proposed off each frontage. Three residential unit entrances from the sidewalk are proposed from W. Beall. With the addition of the surface parking lot, an additional common entrance is to be provided on the west side of the building that will access the parking garage, stairs, and elevators. The proposed streetscape along the primary frontages on N. Willson and W. Beall are proposed to be redesigned to include custom raised planters around boulevard trees and permeable pavers. The City’s Engineering and Forestry Divisions have reviewed these plans for compliance with adopted standards. Adequate connection and integration of the pedestrian and vehicular transportation systems to the systems in adjacent development and the general community Yes Access easements NA NA Dedication of right-of-way or easements necessary for pedestrian, shared use pathway and similar transportation facilities NA Comments: Not required for this application. 6a(3) Loading and Unloading areas Meets Code? Loading and unloading area requirements 38.540.080 NA Loading and unloading NA NA First Berth (min. 70 feet length, 12 feet in width and 14 feet in height) NA NA Additional Berths (min. 45 feet length) NA NA 69 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 18 of 22 Comments: NA, no off-street loading berths are required. 6b Community design and element provisions 38.410 Meets Code? Lot and block standards 38.410.040 Yes Rights of way for pedestrians alternative block delineation NA Comments: NA Provisions for utilities including efficient public services and utilities 38.410.050-060 Yes Municipal infrastructure requirements Yes Easements (City and public utility rights-of-way etc.) Yes Water, sewer, and stormwater Yes Other utilities (electric, natural gas, communications) Yes CIL of water Yes Comments: Payment for CIL of water is required prior to final plan approval. Site Surface Drainage and stormwater control 38.410.080 Yes Location, design and capacity Yes Landscaping per 38.410.080.H NA Comments: Reviewed by the Engineering Department. All stormwater facilities are to be underground infiltration chambers. Two catchment areas are proposed, one for the building, and one for the surface parking lot. Grading 38.410.080 Yes Maximum 1:4 slope requirements met NA Comments: Grading reviewed by the Engineering Department. 6c. Park and recreation requirements 38.420 Meets Code? Enhancement of natural environment NA Wildlife habitat or feeding area preservation NA Maintenance of public park or public open space access NA Park/Recreational area design NA Parkland Cash-in-lieu for maximum known density not to exceed 12 units/acre (ac.). Yes 12 units/ac. X 0.42 ac. X 0.03 park/ac. = 0.15 ac. required Cash donation in-lieu(CIL) 0.15 ac. = 6,534 SF x $1.72/sf = $11,238.48 Yes Improvements in-lieu NA NA Comments: CIL parkland has been satisfied for the existing One 11 building. The new units are required to provide CIL in the B-3 district. The RPAB is scheduled to give final acceptance of the amount on Thursday, June 10th, 2021. The CILP amount must be paid prior to final site plan approval. 7a-c. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Compatibility, Design and Arrangement Meets Code? Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to architectural design, building mass, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the site and visual integration Yes Block Frontage Standards 38.510 Yes Comments: The application is meeting block frontage standards for three street frontages along N. Willson (Mixed-Storefront), W. Beall (both Mixed-Storefront and Mixed-Landscaped), and N. Grand 70 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 19 of 22 (Mixed-Landscaped) with departures and code provisions. Drawings showing the correct amount of transparency required for Mixed-Landscaped along the west portion of W. Beall is a code correction. Structured parking facility development standards 38.510.030.M Yes Comments: The structured parking is completely wrapped with active residential uses meeting the minimum 13-foot depth required. Other requirements of this section are being met including, street level openings, architectural details, and parking entrances. Site Planning and Design Elements 38.520 Yes Design and arrangement of the elements of the plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community, neighborhood, and other approved development and produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive development Yes Relationship to adjacent properties 38.520.030 NA Non-motorized circulation and design 38.520.040 Yes Vehicular circulation and parking 38.520.050 NA Comments: The only non-motorized circulation is the adjacent sidewalk, and small internal sidewalk from the surface lot into the building. Both are meeting connectivity standards to adjacent properties and the public right of way. An entrance is provided on each frontage. Design and arrangement of elements of the plan (e.g., buildings circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography, natural water bodies and water courses, existing vegetation, and to contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration NA Comments: NA, urban design and conditions. Building Design 38.530 Yes Comments: The proposed structure meets the standards of Building Design. The mass and scale is appropriate for the zone district, there is appropriate façade articulation, and effective use of varying materials. Further analysis on building design is in section 13 under NCOD Design Guidelines. 7d. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Landscaping including the enhancement of buildings, appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian area and the preservation of replacement of natural vegetation Meets Code? Submittal requirements for landscape plans 38.220.100 Yes Mandatory landscaping 38.550.050 Yes Yard Yes Additional screening Yes Parking lot screening No Interior parking lot landscape Yes Off-street loading spaces screening NA Street frontage Yes Street median island NA Acceptable landscape materials Yes Protection of landscape areas Yes Irrigation: plan, water source, system type Yes Trees for residential adjacency NA City rights-of-way and parks Yes Tree plantings for boulevard ROW, drought-resistant seed Yes Public ROW boulevard strips Yes Irrigation and maintenance provisions for ROW Yes 71 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 20 of 22 7g. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Signage 38.560 Meets Code? Allowed (sq. ft)/building NA NA Proposed (sq. ft) NA Comments: No signage is proposed at this time. Example signage is shown on the drawings. The applicant should be advised that any signage above an awning is considered roof signage and is prohibited. A sign permit is required prior to the construction of any new signage. 8a-c. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives in articles 4- 6 Meets Code? Enhancement of natural environment: Integrated stormwater, LID, removal of inappropriate fill NA Grading Yes On-site retention/detention Yes Comments: Reviewed by Engineering Department. Drainage design Yes Stormwater maintenance plan 38.410.030.A Yes Stormwater feature: landscaping amenity, native species, curvilinear, 75% live vegetation NA State ROW landscaping NA Additional NA NA Fencing and walls Yes Yes Comments: Landscaping complies with standards, except parking lot screening along N. Grand and W. Lamme. Code provision 5 provides a required correction to address surface parking lot screening. Site planning and design required 38.520 Yes Pedestrian area landscaping, including pathways and internal circulation 38.520.040 Yes Internal roadway landscaping 38.520.050 NA Open space landscaping 38.520.060 Yes Service area and mechanical equipment landscaping and screening 38.520.070 Yes Open space Yes Comments: Project meets requirements. A NWE transformer is accessed off North Grand at the northwest corner of the site. The applicant is working with NWE and private utility providers to design utility locations and relocate overhead power underground. Mechanical equipment screening where present along N. Grand and W. Beall is proposed to be screened with vegetation. Electrical meters at the northwest corner of the building are proposed to be screened architecturally. See open space summary below. 7e. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Open Space Meets Code? Open Space Section 38.520.060 Yes Total required 7,800 SF Yes Total provided 8,416 SF Yes Comments: Open space is provided in the 2nd level common courtyard (1,779 SF), with private balconies (2,833 SF), and in shared facilities (Fitness 525 SF, Ski/Bike Storage 889 SF, Lounge 2,390 SF). 7f. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Lighting 38.570 Meets Code? Building-mounted lighting (cutoff and temperature) Yes Site lighting (supports, cutoff and temperature) NA Minimum light trespass at property line Yes Comments: The proposed building and site lighting meets standards. 72 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 21 of 22 Comments: No above ground stormwater facilities proposed. Watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats NA If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area NA Comments: NA 9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of articles 4-6 Meets Code? Watercourse setback 38.410.100 NA Watercourse setback planting plan NA Floodplain regulations 38.600 NA Wetland regulations 38.610 NA Comments: NA 10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties 38.220 Meets Code? Public Comment NA Comments: Public notice has not been conducted, as it is not required prior to DRB. Once code provisions have bene satisfied and adequacy is determined, public notice will commence. 11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title, whether the lots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming OR Are the subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. 38.410.060 Meets Code? Subdivision exemption Required for lot aggregation Yes Required Easements NA NA Reciprocal access and shared parking easement NA NA Mutual access easement and agreement NA NA Comments: A separate subdivision exemption application is required. The amended plat must be reviewed, approved, and recorded prior to final sit plan approval. 12. Phasing of development 38.230.020.B including buildings and infrastructure Meets Code? Phasing No # of phases 1 Yes Comments: One phase is proposed. 13. Standards for certificate of appropriateness and Conformance with the NCOD Guidelines 38.340.050 Meets Code? Certificate of appropriateness standards Yes Secretary of the Interiors Standards for new construction Yes Architectural appearance Yes Proportion of doors and windows Yes Relationship of building masses and spaces Yes Roof shape Yes 73 Staff Report One 11 2.0 Site Plan Review Application 20456 June 2, 2021 Page 22 of 22 Scale Yes Directional expression, with regard to the dominant horizontal or vertical expression of surrounding structures Yes Architectural details Yes Concealment of non-period appurtenances, such as mechanical equipment Yes Materials and color schemes Yes Comments: The proposed project is located within the NCOD. This means that the project must adhere to a higher level of design, focus on the relationship of the surrounding area, and maintain a level of integrity and character that makes up the NCOD. Introduction Yes Chapter 2: Guidelines for all properties Yes Chapter 4b: Guidelines for commercial areas outside of Main Street Historic District Yes Comments: Applicable standards from Chapter 2 are met including solid-to-void rations of windows to wall on upper floors, lighting to reduce glare, and landscaping buffers to shield visible parking. The proposed structure meets subchapter 4b guidelines for mass and scale, building quality and design, material variety, building roof form, site design, enclosed parking, and street patterns related to properties zoned B-3. The proposed streetscape and lighting will add variety to the district, with permeable pavers, and raised planters for street trees to soften the pedestrian experience and distinguish the built environment from the downtown core. The property is surrounded by B-3 zoning and a variety of adjacent uses including apartment buildings, mixed-use buildings, duplex/triplex residential, single household residential and administrative and office uses. The built context includes the newly constructed One11 building immediately adjacent to this proposed addition, 301 N. Willson (non-eligible, constructed after 2000) is located to the north, 203 W. Lamme to the west (non-contributing new construction), and 122 W. Lamme (individually listed Brandenburg House) to the south. 17 W. Lamme is located to the east, a 4- story 1940’s brick addition to the original Bozeman Deaconess Hospital that is currently used for public housing and is not proposed to be altered by the North Central master site plan. Appendices Yes Comments: The proposed project is reviewed under the classification of new infill and construction in the NCOD, but outside of a historic district. The above sections and chapters of the Bozeman Guidelines for Historic Presentation and the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District apply to this project. The project complies with the guidelines and standards. 15. NCOD Demolition 38.340.100 Review of Demolition of a non-historic structure or site Meets Code? Historic Structure per 38.700.090 No Yes Comments: The existing office building at 206 N. Grand Ave. is non-eligible for historic status and constructed in the 1970’s where it seems to have replaced a single-household structure shown on the 1890 Sanborn maps. The building is eligible for demolition according to the criteria listed below. Criteria Yes 1. The applicable criteria are the COA criteria of section 38.340.050, see above. 2. The subsequent development must include construction of new building(s) unless the immediately prior character of the area did not include buildings. Comments: No demolition of the existing structures until the site plan and building permit for the subsequent development is approved. The subsequent development conforms to the criteria for a COA and plan review criteria. The subsequent development will leave the site with a new parking area and will not result in a vacant site. 74 WAP WAP WAP WAP WAP WVWV S DYHWV WVWV WVWV D UP UP UP (E) ONE 11 -1.0 ONE 11 -2.0 ROPERTY LINENE (ADA) MAIN ENTRY RESIDENTIAL GARAGE ENTRY WATER RISER ACCESS TO SERVE BOTH PHASES OF ONE 11 W. BEALL ST.N. WILLSON AVE.VISION TRIANGLE VISION TRIANGLE FRONTAGE SETBACK LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACY'S THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E 16,222 SF 0.42 ACRES N. GRAND AVE.SPR-A3 2 SPR-A3 3 SPR-A3 4 ONE WAY ENTRY ONLY ONE WAY EXIT ONLY 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 10 10 4 4 5 6 7 7 7 7 88 8 8 99 9 9 11 11 11 7 13 14 14 15 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 19 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 24 24 24 24 333333 3 30 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 32 33 12 35 36 35 35 3737 3838 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 39 39 39 39 39 30 30 30 30 14 40 40 1 31 ON STREET PARKING -1 ON STREET PARKING -2 ON STREET PARKING -3 ON STREET PARKING -4 ON STREET PARKING -5 ON STREET PARKING -6 ON STREET PARKING -7 ON STREET PARKING -8 7 7 1 FRONTAGE DESIGNATION N. WILLSON AVE. = STOREFRONT FRONTAGE In compliance with Sec. 38.510.030.B - See Site Constraint Diagram for building placement - See Exterior Elevation sheets for Facade Transparency calculations W. BEALL ST. = MIXED FRONTAGE In compliance with Sec. 38.510.030.D and 38.510.030.J for special design provisions associated with ground level residential uses adjacent to sidewalk - See Site Constraint Diagram for building placement - See Architectural Site Plan for special design provisions at residential unit at ground floor (In compliance with Sec. 38.510.030.J.1) - See Exterior Elevation sheets for Facade Transparency calculations N. GRAND AVE. = MIXED FRONTAGE In compliance with Sec. 38.510.030.D CASH-IN-LIEU PARKLAND DEDICATION 8 8 99 17 7 PROPERTY SETBACK 9'-0"RES. STOOP = 70 SQ.FT. RAISED 2' FROM SIDEWALK 21 17 8 9 PROPERTY SETBACK RES. STOOP = 60 SQ.FT. RAISED 1'6" FROM SIDEWALK6'-6"9 8 PROPERTY SETBACK RES. STOOP = 60 SQ.FT. RAISED 1' FROM SIDEWALK 6'-6"17 BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\nicoles\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_nicolesYZYN3.rvt 4/14/2021 12:15:36 PMSPR-A3 2032 04/14/2021 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Author Checker ONE 11 2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW RC 1/16" = 1'-0"SPR-A3 1 SPR - SRCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN KEYNOTES - ARCH SITE PLAN 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK - SEE CIVIL 2 PERMEABLE PAVER SIDEWALK; HERRINGBONE PATTERN, VICTORIAN COLOR - SEE CIVIL 3 BRICK FORM PLANTERS - SEE LANDSCAPE 4 (E) PAVED ROAD 5 TRANSFORMER LOCATION - SEE ELEC. - SEE MANUFACTURER FOR INSTALL AND TRANSFORMER SLAB INFORMATION 6 GAS METER LOCATION - SEE PLUMBING 7 (N) TREE & PLANTING - SEE LANDSCAPE 8 (N) CONC. STAIR - SEE CIVIL 9 (N) CONC. LANDING - SEE CIVIL 10 (N) DETECTABLE WALKING SURFACE - SEE CIVIL 11 BUILDING STRUCTURE ABOVE 12 UTILITY EASEMENT - SEE CIVIL 13 ON STREET PARKING 14 TRENCH DRAIN - SEE CIVIL 15 BIKE RACK - SEE LANDSCAPE 16 18" 180 DEGREE TRAFFIC MIRRORS SURFACE MOUNTED @ GARAGE DOOR JAMB - SEE SPEC. 17 STOOP RAILINGS TO MATCH UNIT BALCONY RAILINGS - TO PROVIDE TRANSITION AND RELIEF FROM STREETSCAPE - REF. 6/A0.11 18 (N) LANDSCAPING - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS 19 TRASH ROOM ACCESS - SEE CIVIL 21 PRIVACY SCREEN TO MATCH STEEL PLANTERS, MINIMUM 50% OPACITY 22 CANOPY ABOVE 23 HEATED APRON IN FRONT OF TRASH ENTRANCE, ELEC. MAT HEATING BELOW CONCRETE 24 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT - SEE ELEC. PLANS 25 ELECTRICAL METERS - SEE ELEC. PLANS 26 (N) HANDRAIL @ RESIDENTIAL ENTRY - SEE SITE DETAILS 5/A0.11 27 (N) CONC. RAMP - SEE CIVIL 28 (N) CONC. COLUMN - SEE STRUCT. 29 ELECTRICAL FIXTURE - SEE ELEC. PLANS 30 VISION TRIANGLE 31 PROPERTY LINE 32 RESIDENTIAL GARAGE EXIT 33 METER ACCESS 35 RESIDENTIAL UNIT ENTRY 36 NORTH RESIDENTIAL EGRESS ENTRY/EXIT 37 (N) LIGHT - SEE CIVIL/ELEC. PLANS 38 DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS - SEE CIVIL & PLUMBING PLANS FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION 39 SITE BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL DETAILS 40 (N) SURFACE LOT - SEE CIVIL N NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1 04/14/2021 RC - 01 1/4" = 1'-0"SPR-A3 2 SPR - RESIDENTIAL ENTRY 3 1/4" = 1'-0"SPR-A3 3 SPR - RESIDENTIAL ENTRY 2 1/4" = 1'-0"SPR-A3 4 SPR - RESIDENTIAL ENTRY 1 NNN 75 UP UP B B C C E E F F 11 11 10 10 9 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 A A 8 8 D D 4.3 4.3 6.3 6.3 7.7 7.7 9.5 9.5 10.1 10.1 4.1 4.1 10.9 10.9 1.1 1.1 8205 SF GARAGE ENTRY STOOP ENTRY STOOP Building Area Legend 1B / 1B + D 2B / 2B CIRCULATION GARAGE RESIDENTIAL LOUNGE SKI SHOP / STORAGE UTILITY 936 SF 1B / 1B + D 1113 SF 2B / 2B 1120 SF 2B / 2B 58'-8 1/2"9'-4"47'-6"48'-3 1/2" ELEVATOR 4802.5' 4802.5' 4803.5' 4803.0' 4804.0' UTILITY EASEMENT 9 '-0 "20'- 0"8'-0"6'-6 1/2"LANDING EXTERIOR RAMP WALL BIKE STORAGE 245 SF CIRCULATION 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 16 17 890 SF SKI SHOP / STORAGE 2408 SF RESIDENTIAL LOUNGE 6'X6' TRANSFORMER TRASH 188 SF MAINTENANCE 540 SF IT/COMM 124 SF ELEC. UTILITY 227 SF 4804.0' @ GARAGE ENTRANCE DEMO EXISTING WALL AT NEW OPENING EXISTING PARKING SPACES REMOVED 340 SF CIRCULATION4'-4"BIKE RACKS BIKE RACKSACCENT WALL MAIL BOXES MAIL PARCEL ROOM 4802.0' 4803.0' ENTRY 4803.0' 253'-0" 5'-2"7'-1 3/4"29'-10 1/4"17'-0"9'-9 1/2"13'-2 1/2"11'-8"46'-8"11'-4"27'-8"14'-4"2'-8"7'-8"3'-0"7'-8"2'-8"12'-8"2'-4"8'-10"1'-0"10'-8"64'-9"6'-10"57'-11"69'-8"35'-9"183'-4" 183'-4"64'-4"36'-2"100'-6"10'-6"35'-0"6'-6"48'-6"NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACE DEPTH24'-1"ADA PARKING SPACE POSSIBLE COFFEE SHOP LEASABLE SPACE PROPERTY BOUNDARY 270'-1 7/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY196'-3 7/8"SPR-A4 2 ADDRESSING MATRIX B B 9 98 8 9.5 9.5 A7.01 3 SKI/BIKE SHOP/STORAGE C106 C106BC106A20 LOCKERSTYP.1'-0"13 LOCKERS6 LOCKERS5 LOCKERS 16 - WALL MOUNT BIKE RACKS 17 - WALL MOUNT BIKE RACKS 4 - WALL MOUNT BIKE RACKS7 11 11 11 12 12 12 2'-6"12"45"45"13 14 BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\nicoles\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_nicolesYZYN3.rvt 4/14/2021 12:15:45 PMSPR-A4 2032 04/14/2021 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN Author Checker ONE 11 2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW RC 1/16" = 1'-0"SPR-A4 1 SPR - LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN N NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1 04/14/2021 RC - 01 1/4" = 1'-0"SPR-A4 2 ENLARGED SKI/BIKE SHOP KEYNOTES - ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS & INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 WALL TO PROJECT APPROX. 1" TO CAPTURE WALLCOVERING 2 WOOD TRIM PIECE TO CEILING - PAINTED PT6.4 3 HM FRAME AND DOOR TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH WALL 4 EQUIPMENT TO BE PROVIDED BY TENANT 5 RESIDENT MAIL BOXES, 67 BOXES TO BE PROVIDED - ACTUAL CONFIGURATION AND MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE DETERMINED VIA SUBMITTAL 6 USB/POWER OUTLET - COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL 7 180"X84" VINYL WALL GRAPHIC TO BE INSTALLED AT WALL, ACTUAL DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED VIA SUBMITTAL 8 NOT USED 9 EXTRUDED ALUMINUM TILE EDGE 10 PROVIDE UNDERCOUNTER SINK PLUMBING COVER FOR PROTECTION 11 METAL SKI LOCKER, SEE SPEC 12 WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACK, MOUNT PER MFR. RECOMMENDATIONS IN SPECIFIED LOCATIONS & WALL TYPES - DERO BIKE HOOK SOLO, INSTALLED 16" O.C., ALT. #2 - DERO ULTRA SPACE SAVER SINGLE, INSTALLED 16" O.C. 13 FLOOR MOUNT BIKE STATION, MOUNT PER MFR. RECOMMENDATIONS IN SPECIFIED LOCATION - DERO "FIXIT", INSTALLED 12" OFF WALL AND 45" O.C. 14 WORK BENCH FOR SKIES/SNOWBOARDS/BIKES/ETC. - PREFIN. TABLE - SEE MANUFACTURE SPECS/SHOP DRAWINGS FOR INSTALL RECOMMENDATIONS N.T.S.SPR-A4 3 BIKE FIT-IT STATION N.T.S.SPR-A4 4 SKI LOCKER ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS N.T.S.SPR-A4 5 WALL MOUNT BIKE RACK 1 76 UP B B C C E E F F 11 11 10 10 9 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 A A 8 8 D D 4.3 4.3 6.3 6.3 7.7 7.7 9.5 9.5 10.1 10.1 4.1 4.1 10.9 10.9 1.1 1.1 STAIRS Building Area Legend STUDIO JR 1 BED 1B / 1B + D 2B / 2B + D 3B / 2B 3B / 2B + D BALCONY CIRCULATION COURTYARD FITNESS TRASH UTILITY DEMO EXISTING WALLS 256'-0" 36'-5"24'-9 1/2"9'-9"24'-5"18'-1 1/2"35'-0"18'-0"18'-1"34'-11"36'-6"47'-6"19'-3"66'-9"78'-9" 2'-0"69'-8"7'-1" 30'-4"6'-1"35'-3" 177'-3" 42'-0"42'-0"39'-1"8'-9 1/4"45'-4 3/4" 147'-2 3/4"30'-0 1/4"66'-4"42'-0 1/4"18'-0 3/4"6'-3"UNIT B-2 1 BED / 1 BATH + DEN 202 UNIT B-2 1 BED / 1 BATH + DEN 203 UNIT D-1 3 BED / 2 BATH + DEN 204 UNIT B-3 1 BED / 1 BATH + DEN 205 UNIT B-4 1 BED / 1 BATH + DEN 206 UNIT A-6 1 BED / 1 BATH 207 UNIT C-0 2 BED / 2 BATH + DEN 208 UNIT A-2 1 BED / 1 BATH 209 UNIT A-3 1 BED / 1 BATH 210 UNIT C-4 2 BED / 2 BATH + DEN 211 UNIT D-2 3 BED / 2 BATH 212 UNIT A-1 STUDIO 213 6066 SF COURTYARD 528 SF FITNESS 82 SF TRASH PROPERTY BOUNDARY 270'-1 7/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY196'-3 7/8"ADDRESSING MATRIX BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\nicoles\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_nicolesYZYN3.rvt 4/14/2021 12:15:57 PMSPR-A5 2032 04/14/2021 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN Author Checker ONE 11 2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW RC 1/16" = 1'-0"SPR-A5 1 SPR - LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN N NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 77 UP B B C C E E F F 11 11 10 10 9 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 A A 8 8 D D 4.3 4.3 6.3 6.3 7.7 7.7 9.5 9.5 10.1 10.1 4.1 4.1 10.9 10.9 1.1 1.1 Building Area Legend STUDIO JR 1 BED 1B / 1B 1B / 1B + D 2B / 2B + D 3B / 2B BALCONY CIRCULATIONL. CL. CL. STAIRS STAIRS 1613 SF 2B / 2B + D ? ? 926 SF CIRCULATION 890 SF 1B / 1B + D 728 SF JR 1 BED 1351 SF 2B / 2B + D 732 SF JR 1 BED 1292 SF 2B / 2B + D 1408 SF 3B / 2B 720 SF 1B / 1B 68 SF BALCONY 68 SF BALCONY 732 SF JR 1 BED 1195 SF CIRCULATION 626 SF STUDIO 917 SF 1B / 1B + D 256'-0" 36'-5 1/2"24'-8 1/2"9'-4"24'-11"18'-1"35'-0"18'-0"18'-0"35'-0"36'-6" 78'-9" 177'-3" 42'-0"42'-0"39'-1"8'-9 1/4"7'-2"38'-2 3/4"66'-4"PROPERTY BOUNDARY 270'-0 5/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY55'-8 1/2"PROPERTY BOUNDARY 83'-11 5/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY141'-1 1/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY 186'-1"PROPERTY BOUNDARY196'-9 5/8"18'-10"47'-6"76 SF BALCONY 68 SF BALCONY 64 SF BALCONY 75 SF BALCONY 806 SF 1B / 1B + D 804 SF 1B / 1B + D ADDRESSING MATRIX BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\JordanC\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_jordancL2SGC.rvt 1/27/2021 5:07:33 PMSPR-A6 2032 01/28/2021 LEVEL 3-5 FLOOR PLAN Author Checker ONE 11 -2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW 1/16" = 1'-0"SPR-A6 1 SPR - LEVEL 3-5 FLOOR PLAN N NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 78 B B C C E E F F 11 11 10 10 9 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 A A 8 8 D D 4.3 4.3 6.3 6.3 7.7 7.7 9.5 9.5 10.1 10.1 4.1 4.1 10.9 10.9 1.1 1.1 STAIRS STAIRS ELEVATOR Building Area Legend STUDIO JR 1 BED 1B / 1B 1B / 1B + D 2B / 2B + D 3B / 2B 3B / 2B + D Area BALCONY CIRCULATION UTILITY 155 SF BALCONY 74 SF BALCONY 71 SF BALCONY 644 SF 1B / 1B 783 SF 1B / 1B + D 787 SF 1B / 1B + D 1351 SF 2B / 2B + D 1294 SF 2B / 2B + D 889 SF 1B / 1B + D 1613 SF 3B / 2B + D 832 SF 1B / 1B + D 2077 SF CIRCULATION 49 SF UTILITY 725 SF JR 1 BED 1291 SF 3B / 2B 74 SF BALCONY 66 SF BALCONY 81 SF BALCONY 725 SF JR 1 BED 76 SF BALCONY 47'-6"540 SF STUDIO 734 SF JR 1 BED 19'-6"1'-6"118 SF BALCONY 644 SF 1B / 1B PROPERTY BOUNDARY 270'-0 5/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY55'-8 1/2"PROPERTY BOUNDARY 83'-11 5/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY141'-1 1/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY 186'-1"PROPERTY BOUNDARY196'-9 5/8"ADDRESSING MATRIX BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\JordanC\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_jordancL2SGC.rvt 1/27/2021 4:45:29 PMSPR-A7 2032 01/28/2021 LEVEL 6 FLOOR PLAN Author Checker ONE 11 -2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW 1/16" = 1'-0"SPR-A7 1 SPR - LEVEL 6 FLOOR PLAN N NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 79 B B C C E E F F 11 11 10 10 9 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 A A 8 8 D D 4.3 4.3 6.3 6.3 7.7 7.7 9.5 9.5 10.1 10.1 4.1 4.1 10.9 10.9 1.1 1.1 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"3 1 1 1 1 5 5 5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0" 46'-3 1/2"4'-2"4'-0"4'-2"12'-4"1/4" / 12" 42'-4"12'-4"50'-4"4'-2"4'-0"4'-2"EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13 EW-13PROPERTY BOUNDARY55'-8 1/2"PROPERTY BOUNDARY 270'-0 5/8" PROPERTY BOUNDARY 83'-11 3/4"PROPERTY BOUNDARY141'-1 1/8"PROPERTY BOUNDARY 186'-1"PROPERTY BOUNDARY196'-9 5/8"12'-4"2 SPR-A8 2 SPR-A8 2 SPR-A8 66 6 2 2 2 EXISTING ONE 11 BUILDING 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 1'-0"1'-0 5/8"10 1/2"3'-4"RC-1 NAILER AS REQ. @ PERIM. OF PARAPET CONT. -HEIGHT VARIES -FIELD VERIFY SEAM WELD @ MEMBRANE PER MFR. TERM BAR & FASTENERS PER MEMB. MFR. CANT BLOCK BEYOND SCUPPER OPENING. MAINTAIN 10"X10" MIN.FRAMED OPENING. CONT. MEMBRANE UP AND OVER PARAPET WALL -FASTEN PER MFR. SLOPED, TREATED 2X'S AS REQ. ROOF MEMB. O/ ADHESIVE PER MFR. WATER CUTOFF SEALANT PER ROOF MEMB. MFR. FASTENERS PER FACIA MFR. PREFIN. MLT. SNAP-ON FASCIA SYSTEM PER ROOF MEMEB. MFR. EXTEND MEMB. DOWN FACE OF CAP W/ SEALANT TAPE PER MFR. WRAP EXPOSED EDGE OF 2X W/PERFIN. BRAKE MTL. MEMBRANE LINE BEYOND SCUPPER TREATED 2X FRAMING SPACED ACCORDING MECH'L UNIT MFGR. REQUIREMENTS FASTEN MECH'L UNIT TO TREATED BLOCKING -SEE CURB DTL. FLASHING & COUNTERFLASHING - SEE CURB DTL. 2X6 FRAMING ENGINEERED WOOD JOIST - SEE STRUCT. 1. ROOF DRAINS AND OVERFLOW DRAINS, WHEN NOT DIMENSIONED, ARE TO BE CENTERED OR EQUALLY SPACED WITHIN THE ROOF AREA AS SHOWN. DIMENSIONS INDICATED FOR ROOF DRAINS AND OVERFLOW DRAINS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE ADJUSTED +/-1'-0" AS REQUIRED. 2. CENTER OF ROOF DRAINS TO BE LOCATED 2'-0" MINIMUM FROM ADJACENT ROOF EDGE, PARAPET OR WALLS AS SHOWN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. IN ADDITION TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY LOCATIONS, TYPES, SIZES AND QUANTITIES OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ROOF PENETRATIONS/ITEMS. 4. TAPERED INSULATION SHALL BEGIN AT 0" THICKNESS AT TOP EDGE OF ROOF DRAIN SUMPS AND SLOPE UP AND AWAY AT 1/4" PER FOOT AS SHOWN TO ACCOMPLISH POSITIVE DRAINAGE AT ALL LOCATIONS. 5. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH ALL CURBS REQUIRED FOR HVAC EQUIPMENT, SEE MECHANICAL. 6. ALL FLASHING, ROOFING TIE-INS AND ROOFING ACCESSORIES NECESSARY FOR ROOFING PENETRATIONS, CURBS AND MOUNTING ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ROOFING MANUFACTURER. SHEET NOTES -ROOF PLAN BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\JordanC\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_jordancL2SGC.rvt 1/27/2021 4:45:35 PMSPR-A8 2032 01/28/2021 ROOF PLAN Author Checker ONE 11 -2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW N NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1/16" = 1'-0"SPR-A8 1 SPR - ROOF PLAN 1 1/2" = 1'-0"SPR-A8 2 SPR - TYP DETAIL MECHANICAL SCREEN KEYNOTES - ROOF PLAN 1 PRIMARY & SECONDARY OVERFLOW ROOF DRAINS - SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS AND ARCH. DETAILS 2 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT - SEE MECH. DRAWINGS 3 36" X 96" ROOF HATCH 4 24" X 24" MFR. STANDARD WALKWAY PADS 5 NO PENETRATIONS IN HATCHED AREA SHOWN. FIREWALL FLUSH TO TOP OF STRUCTURE 6 MECHANICAL SCREEN - SEE DETAIL 7 UNIT BALCONY BELOW 8 UNIT JULIET BALCONY BELOW 9 EXTERIOR COURTYARD BELOW, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 80 LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 115'-0" B B C C E E LEVEL 3 125'-8" LEVEL 4 136'-4" LEVEL 5 147'-0" LEVEL 6 157'-8" T.O. ROOF 168'-4" F F A AD ABABC R9.A L L K L K N R9.A H L L K L K K G H L L K L K K G H L L K L K K G GKKLKLLH 100B A A A A C 107B 3 2 993 333 3 44 4 4'-0"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"15'-0"CANOPY HEIGHT8'-11 1/2"HORIZONTAL CEDAR SIDING PREFINISHED CORRUGATED METAL SIDING MODULAR BRICK VENEER 8" CMU -GROUND FACE ARCHITECTURAL FINISH SEALED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MATERIAL LEGEND A B C D LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 115'-0" LEVEL 3 125'-8" LEVEL 4 136'-4" LEVEL 5 147'-0" LEVEL 6 157'-8" T.O. ROOF 168'-4" 11 10 9 7 6 5 4 3 2 184.36.37.79.510.1 4.110.9 1.1 A BB C BABA C BBAB C B C C C D K K L H K K L H K K L H K K L H K K L R9.A K L K L K L K L G H G H G H G H G H K L LK K L K L LK L G GL L G GL L G H H H H H L L L L L K M MK K M K M K M R9 R9 R9 R9 R9.A K M G M MGMK K M G M MGMK K M G M K L LK K L LK K L G G G G G E E E E E K L LK K L K L K L KK K K KK K K R9.A K L K L K L K L K L K K M M G GKK K K M G GMKK K K M G GHF R0.AS-2B DD FR0LFHGGR0FG B 106A CCB 100A A 1 3 4 8 9 11 106A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3333 3 333 44444 8 999 1111 415'-0"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"4'-0"CANOPY HEIGHT8'-11 1/2"BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\JordanC\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_jordancL2SGC.rvt 1/27/2021 4:46:23 PMSPR-A9 2032 01/28/2021 BUILDING ELEVATIONS Author Checker ONE 11 -2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW 3/32" = 1'-0"SPR-A9 1 SPR-EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"SPR-A9 2 SPR-NORTH ELEVATION KEYNOTES - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 STEEL BALCONY - GUARDRAIL, WIRE MESH METAL INFILL 2 ALUMINUM GLASS OVERHEAD DOOR WITH MOTORIZED OPENER 3 PREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING 4 STEEL CANOPY - PAINT TO MATCH WINDOWS - SEE DETAILS 5 TRANSFORMER LOCATION - SEE ELEC. 6 LOUVER - PAINT TO MATCH METAL BEYOND - SEE MECH. 7 GAS METER - SEE PLUMBING 8 BUILDING SIGNAGE - COORD. W/ SIGNAGE MANF. 9 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING - SEE DETAILS 10 UTILITY GATE - SEE SITE DETAIL 11 BLACKENED STEEL PLANTERS - SEE LANDSCAPE NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 81 LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 115'-0" B B C C E E LEVEL 3 125'-8" LEVEL 4 136'-4" LEVEL 5 147'-0" LEVEL 6 157'-8" T.O. ROOF 168'-4" F F A A D A B A A DC D107A H K L L K K G G G G G GG G G GK K K KK K K KL L L LL L L LK K K KH H H H 10 7 5 6 44 3 3399 3 EXISTING ONE 11 BUILDING4'-0"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"15'-0"LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 115'-0" LEVEL 3 125'-8" LEVEL 4 136'-4" LEVEL 5 147'-0" LEVEL 6 157'-8" T.O. ROOF 168'-4" 11 11 10 10 9 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 8 84.3 6.3 7.7 9.5 10.14.1 10.91.1 A B A B A B A B B A A D MK MK MK MK MKM202A R9 R9 R9 R9.AR9.A R9 R9 R9 R9 R9 R9 R9 R9 R9.A H H H H HL L L L LK K K K KK K K K KH H H H H R0.B K K K KE E E E E J J J J JK K K K KJ J J J J M M M M M 109A108A 9 1 3 4 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3333333399 3 3 3 4NEW GARAGE OPENING EXISTING ONE 11 BUILDING MECH C110 EW-1 EW-1 FA-2 L4'-0"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"10'-8"15'-0"HORIZONTAL CEDAR SIDING PREFINISHED CORRUGATED METAL SIDING MODULAR BRICK VENEER 8" CMU -GROUND FACE ARCHITECTURAL FINISH SEALED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MATERIAL LEGEND A B C D BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\JordanC\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_jordancL2SGC.rvt 1/27/2021 4:47:15 PMSPR-A10 2032 01/28/2021 BUILDING ELEVATIONS Author Checker ONE 11 -2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW 3/32" = 1'-0"SPR-A10 1 SPR-WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"SPR-A10 2 SPR-SOUTH ELEVATION NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION KEYNOTES - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 STEEL BALCONY - GUARDRAIL, WIRE MESH METAL INFILL 2 ALUMINUM GLASS OVERHEAD DOOR WITH MOTORIZED OPENER 3 PREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING 4 STEEL CANOPY - PAINT TO MATCH WINDOWS - SEE DETAILS 5 TRANSFORMER LOCATION - SEE ELEC. 6 LOUVER - PAINT TO MATCH METAL BEYOND - SEE MECH. 7 GAS METER - SEE PLUMBING 8 BUILDING SIGNAGE - COORD. W/ SIGNAGE MANF. 9 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING - SEE DETAILS 10 UTILITY GATE - SEE SITE DETAIL 11 BLACKENED STEEL PLANTERS - SEE LANDSCAPE 82 BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\JordanC\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_jordancL2SGC.rvt 1/27/2021 4:48:54 PMSPR-A11 2032 01/28/2021 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS Author Checker ONE 11 -2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW SPR-A11 1 SPR-NE EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE SPR-A11 2 SPR-NW EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE SPR-A11 3 SPR-SE EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE SPR-A11 4 SPR-SW EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 83 CP 3 C WVDS GVSS DYHWV WVWV WVGS GS D WV 1 2 2 3 (E) ONE 11 -1.0 W. BEALL ST.N. WILLSON AVE.N. GRAND AVE.G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG G G G G G G G G G G G G G UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE G G UGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGC UGC UGCUGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGC UGCUGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC SS SS SS SS SS WWWWW W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW SS SS WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W SS SS SSSSSS SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGC UGE UGE REMOVE (E) PARKING LOT ASPHALT G G G G G G G G G REMOVE (E) VEGETATION REMOVE (E) SITE SIGN REMOVE (E) SITE SIGN REMOVE (E) SITE SIGN REMOVE (E) SITE SIGN REMOVE (E) VEGETATIONREMOVE (E) VEGETATION REMOVE (E) PARKING LOT ASPHALTREMOVE (E) PARKING LOT ASPHALT REMOVE (E) VEGETATION REMOVE (E) VEGETATION REMOVE (E) VEGETATION REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING REMOVE (E) VEGETATION WWWWWWW SS SS OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE UGC OHEOHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE UGCUGCUGC OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE G REMOVE (E) CONCRETE REMOVE (E) CONCRETE REMOVE (E) CONCRETE REMOVE (E) VEGETATION REMOVE (E) POSTREMOVE (E) POST REMOVE (E) POST REMOVE (E) POST REMOVE (E) POSTS REMOVE (E) POST OHE OHE OHE UGE UGE UGE (E) SIDEWALK -TO REMAIN, REPAIR AS NEEDED REMOVE (E) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, DISCONNECT AT PROPERTY LINE REMOVE (E) GAS SERVICE, DISCONNECT AT PROPERTY LINE REMOVE (E) WATER SERVICE, DISCONNECT AT PROPERTY LINE REMOVE (E) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SERVICE REMOVE (E) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SERVICE REMOVE (E) OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SERVICE REMOVE (E) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE SD SD SD W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSD SD W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE REMOVE (E) SIDEWALK OHE OHE W. LAMME ST. (E) SIDEWALK -TO REMAIN, REPAIR AS NEEDED REMOVE (E) SIDEWALK REMOVE (E) SITE SIGN GGG G 1. Contractor to verify all existing utility locations prior to all demolition activity. 2. Contractor to cut tree roots at property line as noted per plan, do not disturb adjacent properties. 3. Do not disturb site features noted as to remain. 4. Franchise Utilities. Contact utility service provider for service disconnection prior to demolition of any franchise utilities. Remove overhead power and communication lines back to main line in alley. Remove gas service to the property line. Mark end of gas line. 5. Water Service Demolition. Contact water department prior to demolition to verify that water can be shut off at curb stop. Remove water service to existing curb stop, and cap at curbstop. Leave curb stop in place. 6. Sewer Service Demolition. Remove sewer service to property line and cap at property line. Mark end of service with a 2x4 post painted green. 7. Site Demolition. Remove all building foundations, asphalt, concrete, and other surfacing materials and aggregate base courses as shown on the plans. Restore to original grade and cap with topsoil for revegetation. Seed with dryland grass seed. Do not damage or remove surfaces outside of property line. Protect existing sidewalk to remain, replace if damaged. SHEET NOTES -DEMOLITION EXHIBIT BIM FILE PATH: SHEET NO.: TITLE: copyright 2018 SMA, P.C. REVISIONS: KEYMAP: HELENA 920 Front Street | Suite 101 Helena | MT | 59601 P| 406/442.4933 www.architects-sma.com ARCHITECT SEAL: PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: PREPARED FOR: LOGO: CONSULTANT: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: TEAM: PHASE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER:Plot Date:BOZEMAN 109 East Oak Street | Suite 2E Bozeman | MT | 59715 P| 406/219.2216 www.architects-sma.com C:\Users\brookep\Documents\2032 - One11-2-R20_brookep5QMGZ.rvt 4/14/2021 12:44:50 PMSPR-A12 2032 04/14/2021 DEMOLITION EXHIBIT Author Checker ONE 11 2.0 2032 LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS NORTH THIRD ADDITION, PLAT C-18-E | BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 SITE PLAN REVIEW RC NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1/16" = 1'-0"SPR-A12 1 DEMOLITION EXHIBIT N 84 LOTS 8-10, BLOCK B, OFTRACYS 3RD ADDITIONPLAT C-18-E 0.27 ac (11,296 sf)ONE 11 (EXISTING)LOT A, BLOCK B, OF TRACYS THIRD ADDITIONPLAT C-18-E 0.42 ac (18,296 sf)NORTH GRAND AVE WEST BEALL STREETNORTH WILLSON AVEWEST LAMME STREETLOT B, BLOCK B, OFTRACYS 3RD ADDITIONPLAT C-18-E0.53 ac (22,937 sf)PROFESSIONALENGINEERS &SURVEYORSONE 11 2.0 OF NORTH CENTRAL MASTER SITE PLAN STAHLYENGINEERING& ASSOCIATESHOMEBASE PARTNERS BOZEMAN, MONTANAC1.0ONE 11 2.0EX. COND.PLANNEW PROPERTYINCLUDED IN PROJECT85 TRASH RMC104PARCEL DROPC105RESIDENTIALLOUNGEC100STORAGEC103BATHROOMC102SKI/BIKESHOP/STORAGEC106ELEC RMC108STAIRSS-1STAIRSS-2GARAGEC109ELECTRICALROOMC111.1CORRIDORC110FA-1RESIDENTIALHALLWAYC112MECH.C111TRASH RMC104PARCEL DROPC105RESIDENTIALLOUNGEC100STORAGEC103BATHROOMC102SKI/BIKESHOP/STORAGEC106ELEC RMC108STAIRSS-1STAIRSS-2GARAGEC109ELECTRICALROOMC111.1CORRIDORC110FA-1RESIDENTIALHALLWAYC112MECH.C111ONE 11 2.0 BUILDINGONE 11 (EXISTING)NORTH GRAND AVE WEST BEALL STREETNORTH WILLSON AVE BLOCK B, LOT 1(PROPOSED AGGREGATION)53,034 sf (1.217 ac)PROFESSIONALENGINEERS &SURVEYORSONE 11 2.0 OF NORTH CENTRAL MASTER SITE PLAN STAHLYENGINEERING& ASSOCIATESHOMEBASE PARTNERS BOZEMAN, MONTANAC1.1ONE 11 2.0CIVILSITE PLANNOTENEW SURFACE PARKINGLOT INCLUDED IN PROJECTREVISED STORMWATEROVERFLOW DESIGNNEW AWNINGSTORM DRAIN86 1WEST LAMME STREETWEST BEALL STREET - ROW 58'NORTH WILLSON AVENUE - ROW 60' NORTH GRAND AVENUE - ROW 52'270'-1"68'-3"32196'-4"4566EXISTING ONE 11 BUILDINGONE 11 2.0 BUILDINGBLOCK B, LOT A-1 OF TRACY'S THIRD ADDITION(PROPOSED AGGREGATION)41,233 SFS89ͮ05'20"E 28.00'N00ͮ55'20"E 43.12'S89ͮ05'20"E 158.00'S89ͮ01'50"E 270.08'S89ͮ04'59"W 84.01'N00ͮ57'18"E 31.00'S00ͮ57'18"W 68.29'N00ͮ54'29"E 56.20'7917933321033111281314141715151411184'-2"33101077PARKING LOTLANDSCAPING-170 SFPARKING LOTLANDSCAPING-813 SFPARKING LOTLANDSCAPING-385 SFPARKING LOTLANDSCAPING-198 SF161616SHEET INDEXL000OVERALL SITE PLANL001LANDSCAPE SITE PLANL002LANDSCAPE SITE PLANL003LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - LEVEL 2L500LANDSCAPE DETAILSL501LANDSCAPE DETAILSL502LANDSCAPE DETAILSL600IRRIGATION SITE PLANL601IRRIGATION SITE PLANL602IRRIGATION SITE PLAN - LEVEL 2L700IRRIGATION DETAILS1.SETBACK LANDSCAPING:NONE REQUIRED. NO SIDE OR REAR SETBACKS ARE REQUIRED IN THE B-3 ZONE. THE FRONT SETBACK IS ON A MIXED BLOCK FRONTAGE AND IS APPLYING A STOREFRONT FRONTAGESTANDARD.2.DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES REQUIRED:75% OR GREATER OF THE PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES AS DEFINED IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MONTANA NURSERY AND LANDSCAPEASSOCIATION'S DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR THE MONTANA LANDSCAPE OR THE COB LIST OF DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES.3.PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING:32 TOTAL PARKING SPOTS WITH 0 DISABLED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOTSTREES:·REQUIRED: 1 LARGE CANOPY TREE FOR EVERY 9 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (3 TREES); ALL PARKING SPACES MUST BE WITHIN 70 FEET OF THE TRUNK OF A TREE.·PROVIDED: 3 LARGE CANOPY TREES AND ALL PARKING SPACES ARE WITHIN 70 FEET OF THE TRUNK OF A TREELANDSCAPE AREA:·REQUIRED: ANY PARKING LOT PROVIDING 15 OR MORE PARKING SPACES SHALL HAVE: A MINIMUM OF 20 SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING LOT PER EACH OFFSTREET PARKING SPACE IN THE LOT (640 SF REQUIRED) PROVIDED: 1,566 SF OF LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING LOT PROVIDED.4.SCREENING OF OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES:THIS PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE AN OFF STREET LOADING SPACE THAT REQUIRES SCREENING .5.STREET FRONTAGE LANDSCAPING:·REQUIRED: ONE LARGE CANOPY TREE FOR EVERY 50' OF STREET FRONTAGE .a.W. BEALL STREET - 270.08 LINEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE MINUS 58.42' SITE VISION TRIANGLE - 211.66', (4 LARGE CANOPY TREES REQUIRED) - 6 LARGE CANOPY TREES PROVIDEDb.N. WILLSON AVENUE 68.29' LINEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE MINUS 65.17' SITE VISION TRIANGLE AND DRIVEWAY= 3.12', (1 TREES REQUIRED) - 1 PROVIDEDc.N. GRAND AVENUE 196.33' LINEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE MINUS 133.5' SITE VISION TRIANGLE AND DRIVEWAY= 62.83', (1 TREES REQUIRED) - 1 PROVIDED.PROVIDED TREE NOTLOCATED IN THE R.O.W. BECAUSE THE SIDEWALK FILLS THE R.O.W.d.W. LAMME STREET - 84.22 LINEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE MINUS 19.5' SITE VISION TRIANGLE - 64.72', (1 LARGE CANOPY TREES REQUIRED) - 3 (EXISTING) LARGE CANOPY TREESPROVIDED.·PROVIDED: 11 LARGE CANOPY TREES (8 NEW + 3 EXISTING)4.STREET MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPING:THERE ARE NO STREET MEDIANS IN THE PROJECT5.ACCEPTABLE LANDSCAPE MATERIALS:THE PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT MEET THE STANDARDS OF SEC38.550.030 G. SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE FOR SPECIES AND SIZES OF PLANT MATERIAL.6.UTILITY METER SCREENING:THE UTILITY METERS ON THIS PROJECT ARE LOCATED INSIDE OR ARE A PART OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND HAVE BEEN SCREENED.LANDSCAPE CODE SUMMARY - One 11 2.0(B3 WITH NO RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY)1VISION TRIANGLEKEYNOTES2EXISTING SIDEWALK AT ONE 11 LOFTS3TRASH LOADING AREA4ON STREET PARKING, SEE CIVIL5UTILITY ACCESS6UTILITY EASEMENT, SEE CIVIL7SNOW STORAGE, TYP.8CONCRETE SCORE JOINT, TYP.9CONCRETE PAVERS, SEE CIVIL FOR DETAIL101112131415LIMIT OF EXISTING ONE 11 LOFTS BUILDINGPROPERTY LINEEXISTING TREE TO BE REMAINSTEEL PLANTER, SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET L502AT-GRADE LANDSCAPE BEDRAISED STREETSCAPE PLANTER, SEE DETAIL 10, L50016PARKING LOT SCREENINGPROJECT DATAONE 11 2.0PROJECT OWNERHOMEBASE PARTNERS20 N. Tracy AvenueBozeman, MT 59715(406) 404 - 1788ENGINEERSTAHLY ENGINEERS851 Bridger Dr. Suite 1Bozeman, MT 59715(406) 522 - 8594ARCHITECTSMA ARCHITECTS109 E. Oak Street Suite 2EBozeman, MT 59715(406) 219 - 2216LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTDESIGN 5, LLCTroy Scherer37 East Main Street, Suite 10Bozeman, MT 59715(406) 587 - 4873TREESSYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMESIZETYPESPACINGQUANTITYCOMMON NAMEPLANT SCHEDULE - LEVEL 1ACER X 'WARRENRED''PACIFIC SUNSET MAPLE2.5" CALB & BPER PLAN5PERENNIALS & GRASSES*** DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIESMATUREHEIGHT20' - 25'MATURESPREAD20' - 25'ACHILLEA 'CORONATION GOLD'***CORONATION GOLD YARROW1 GALPOTPER PLAN171.5' - 2'1.5' - 2'AJUGA REPTANSBRONZE BEAUTY BUGLEWEED 1 GALPOTPER PLAN246"- 8"1' - 1.5'AQUILEGIA CHRYSANTHA***YELLOW COLUMBINE1 GALPOTPER PLAN82' - 3'1.5' - 2'DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA***TUFTED HAIR GRASS1 GALPOTPER PLAN133' - 4'2' - 3'FESTUCA GLAUCA 'BOULDER BLUE'***BOULDER BLUE FESCUE 1 GALPOTPER PLAN233' - 4'2' - 3'LIATRIS SPICATA 'KOBOLD'***DWARF GAYFEATHER1 GALPOTPER PLAN501.5' - 2'1' - 1.5'RATIBIDA COLUMNIFERAPRAIRIE CONEFLOWERSALVIA NEMOROSA 'CARADONNA'***CARADONNA MEADOW SAGESEDUM SPIRIUM 'DRAGON'S BLOOD'***DRAGON'S BLOOD SEDUM1 GALPOTPER PLAN221' - 2'1.5' 1 GALPOTPER PLAN121.5' - 2'1' - 1.5'1 GALPOTPER PLAN136"2'TILIA MONGOLICA HARVEST GOLDHARVEST GOLD LINDEN2.5" CALB & BPER PLAN620' - 25'20' - 25'MINI-NUGGET BARK MULCH422 SFCONCRETE PAVERS - BELGARD AQUA-ROC 4.5"x9"x3.125" PERMEABLEPAVER, COLOR TO BE VICTORIAN, HERRINGBONE PATTERN1,225 SF1 GALPOTPER PLAN73' -5'2' - 4'PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA***RUSSIAN SAGECALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER'KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS***1 GALPOTPER PLAN603' - 5'2'LYSIMACHIA NUMMULARIACREEPING JENNY 'AUREA'1 GALPOTPER PLAN61'1'FESCUE SOD628 SFSHRUBSJUNIPEROUS CHINENSIS 'MONDAP'***MONDAP JUNIPER5 GALPOTPER PLAN321.5' - 2'1.5' - 2'RIBES ALPINUM***ALPINE CURRANT5 GALPOTPER PLAN211.5' - 2'1.5' - 2'MEDICINE MOUNTAIN ROCK MULCH - AVAILABLE FROM SCENIC CITYLANDSCAPING, 2239 AMSTERDAM ROAD, BELGRADE, MT 59714, 406-388 -77712,748 SFOverallSite PlanL 0002010040N1L0001" = 20'-0"Overall Site Plandesign5la.com406.587.4873dateissuedrawn by:checked by:filename:z:\one11 2.0\autocad\01_sheets\l000_one11-2.0_d5_landscape.dwg One 11 Lofts 2.0 Bozeman, Montana KHM/HU TMS 01/26/21COB SP104/14/21RC 0115'10'187