Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9g 3of3__Baxter Lane ROW Delineation Addendum to the Northwest Crossing Subdivision Wetland Delineation 072120APPENDIX B: Wetland Data Forms Project Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 6/22/2020 Applicant/Owner: Kline State: Montana Sampling Point: WDP 1 Investigator(s): B. Wainright, C. Pearcy Section/Range: Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): uDitch concave/ditch Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat: 45.70008 Long: -111.1064 Soil Map Unit Name: 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes NA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil x Hydrology x significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Yes x No Yes X Yes x No No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B) 4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes x No Depth (inches)0 Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches)Yes x (includes cappillary fringe)No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. NWX Roadside Ditch Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: Section 4/ Range 5 East WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Roadside ditch HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 1 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 2( A ) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 50 x 1 =50 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 50 x 3 =150 5 FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:100 (A) (B)200 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is >50% 3 X Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 50 YES OBL in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 25 0 Y E S F A C h e i g h t 3 4 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) This is an area where it stopped being 100% cattails and transitioned in to meadow foxtail. I believe this is an idication of getting drier but it was still a wetland in this location Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Typha latifolia Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Alopecurus pratensis SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana WDP 1 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-8 100 muck 8-?gravel 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5)x 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) x Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): rock 8 Yes X No 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) Muck saturated and hard to tell Color (moist) Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Project Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 6/22/2020 Applicant/Owner: Kline State: Montana Sampling Point: UDP 1 Investigator(s): B. Wainright, C. Pearcy Section/Range: Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): uDitch concave/ditch Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat: 45.70011 Long: -111.10643 Soil Map Unit Name: 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes NA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil x Hydrology x significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Yes No X Yes Yes No X No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B) 4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)Yes (includes cappillary fringe)No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. NWX Roadside Ditch Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: Section 4/ Range 5 East WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Roadside, road shoulder HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 1 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 0( A ) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 0% (A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =0 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 20 x 3 =60 5 FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 70 x 5 =350 7 Column Totals:90 (A) (B)410 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =5 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 70 YES UPL in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 10 NO FAC height 31 0 N O F A C 41 0 N O # N / ASapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Bromus inermis Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of: Multiply by: equisetum arvense Cirsium arvense Thinopyrum intermedium SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana UDP 1 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-8 100 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes No X 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) gravelly hardpack from roa Color (moist) Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Project Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 6/22/2020 Applicant/Owner: Kline State: Montana Sampling Point: WDP 2 Investigator(s): B. Wainright, C. Pearcy Section/Range: Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): uDitch concave/ditch Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat: 45.70012 Long: -111.104668 Soil Map Unit Name: 53B Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes NA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil x Hydrology x significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Yes x No Yes X Yes x No No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B) 4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches)6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches)6 Yes x (includes cappillary fringe)No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. NWX Roadside Ditch Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: Section 4/ Range 5 East WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Roadside ditch HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 1( A ) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =0 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 100 x 3 =300 5 FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:100 (A) (B)300 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =3 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is >50% 3 X Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 100 YES FAC height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Took point on the boundary of where ditch became dry. Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Alopecurus pratensis SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana WDP 2 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-1 100 2-6 100 clay loam 6-12 50 clay loam 6-12 50 clay 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) x Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): rock Yes X No 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. 10YR 2/1 10YR2/1 Remarks Color (moist) Road mix Road mix clay inclusions Color (moist) 10YR4/2 Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Project Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 6/22/2020 Applicant/Owner: Kline State: Montana Sampling Point: UDP 2 Investigator(s): B. Wainright, C. Pearcy Section/Range: Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): uDitch concave/ditch Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat: 45.70011 Long: -111.104002 Soil Map Unit Name: 53B Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes NA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil x Hydrology x significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Yes No X Yes Yes No X No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B) 4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)Yes (includes cappillary fringe)No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. NWX Roadside Ditch Gallatin Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: Section 4/ Range 5 East WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland?Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Roadside ditch, likely previously excavated HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 0( A ) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 0% (A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =0 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 20 x 3 =60 5 FACU species 10 x 4 =40 6 UPL species 40 x 5 =200 7 Column Totals:70 (A) (B)300 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =4 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 40 YES UPL in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 21 0 N O F A C U h e i g h t 31 0 N O F A C 43 0 Y E S # N / ASapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 10 NO FAC than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') Sapling Stratum (30') Bromus inermis Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Galium aparine Cirsium arvense Thinopyrum intermedium Lepidium latifolium SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana UDP 2 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-8 100 clay loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes No X 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) 10YR 3/2 gravel below Color (moist) Redox Fetures Hydric Soil Present? Matrix APPENDIX C: Photo Log Baxter Road ROW Ditch Delineation June 2020 Photo 1: Ditch wetland/upland boundary Photo 2: Wetland Pit W-1-20 Baxter Road ROW Ditch Delineation June 2020 Photo 3: Wetland Pit W-1-20, at the divide between cattails and meadow foxtail Photo 4: Upland Pit, side of ditch adjacent to Baxter Ditch Baxter Road ROW Ditch Delineation June 2020 Photo 5: Upland Pit, eastern portion of ditch.