Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmail from Shawn Kohtz on NWX gravity Sewer 070820From:Shawn Kohtz To:Matt E. Ekstrom; "Bryan Klein" Cc:Lance Lehigh; Griffin Nielsen; Bob Murray; Lee Hageman Subject:RE: Norton Sewer Outfall Date:Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:29:35 AM Attachments:image003.pngimage004.pngimage005.pngimage006.pngimage008.pngimage009.pngimage010.png ***This message originated from an External Source.*** Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. At a quick glance, that is what I was thinking. I haven’t checked for conflicts or the sewer capacity of the altered slope, but that seems to be a good starting point. From: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:25 AM To: Shawn Kohtz <SKohtz@BOZEMAN.NET>; 'Bryan Klein' <bklein@blackridgeco.com> Cc: Lance Lehigh <llehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>; Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET>; Bob Murray <BMurray@BOZEMAN.NET>; Lee Hageman <lhageman@m-m.net> Subject: RE: Norton Sewer Outfall Shawn / Bob, We marked up the attached plan sheets with the changes needed. Please let us know if this makes sense. We could get together with Sanderson and discuss if necessary. Regards, Matt From: Lee Hageman <lhageman@m-m.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 2:03 PM To: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Subject: Proposed Modifications - Norton Sewer Near Baxter Lane Matt, I have attached a copy of the proposed modifications to deepen the Norton Sewer from Manhole 1 to Manhole 4. The stationing, lengths, and inverts are approximate based on my hand calculations, but are representative of what we are trying to accomplish. Thanks, Lee Hageman, PE Land Development Engineer, Morrison-Maierle 406.922.6734 2880 Technology Blvd W, Bozeman, MT 59718 Matt E. Ekstrom, PESenior Land Development Engineer, Morrison-Maierle 406.922.6784 direct | 406.431.5819 mobile From: Shawn Kohtz <SKohtz@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 5:33 PM To: 'Bryan Klein' <bklein@blackridgeco.com>; Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Cc: Lance Lehigh <llehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>; Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET>; Bob Murray <BMurray@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: RE: Norton Sewer Outfall ***This message originated from an External Source.*** Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Bob, I had a discussion with Bryan. Please have Sanderson Stewart prepare a design cost to deepen the sewer (Matt, please confirm the manhole terminus point (MH4?)). Please also have Sanderson Stewart obtain a change order price from the contractor for the deepened sewer section. Send Sanderson Stewart’s design cost to this group. Once the City receives payment for the design change, please advise Sanderson to proceed with the work. I’ll send Bryan an example agreement from another project as a starting point to draft an agreement for the construction change order. Once Bryan’s legal team returns a draft agreement, we will have the City’s legal team review. Thanks, City of Bozeman MT Shawn Kohtz, PE City Engineer 406.582.2280skohtz@bozeman.net From: Bryan Klein <bklein@blackridgeco.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 4:20 PM To: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net>; Shawn Kohtz <SKohtz@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc: Lance Lehigh <llehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>; Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET>; Bob Murray <BMurray@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: RE: Norton Sewer Outfall Hello Shawn, Just following-up regarding this topic. I’d like to move this forward and would like to get an estimate of cost from Sanderson and the contractor. Can you jump on a quick call still today? Also, do you have a similar agreement that you can share with me as a starting point for this agreement? I’ll be traveling starting tomorrow until the 20th of July. Bryan Klein Principal Office 406.582.8100 Cell 406.581.3812 Email bklein@blackridgeco.com Web blackridgeco.com From: Bryan Klein Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 2:39 PM To: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net>; Shawn Kohtz <SKohtz@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc: llehigh@BOZEMAN.NET; Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET>; Bob Murray (BMurray@BOZEMAN.NET) <BMurray@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: RE: Norton Sewer Outfall Shawn, Thanks for considering the design options outlined below. Your suggestion in #1 sounds like a good plan but I would like to have an idea of the costs associated with the redesign and construction change order. Understanding that time is of the essence, I’d like to schedule a call or meeting with COB, Sanderson Stewart and the contractor tomorrow to discuss these pending work changes. Are you available and who are the contacts at SS and the contractor (I’m not sure if they are aware of this potential change)? Thank you, Bryan Klein Principal Office 406.582.8100 Cell 406.581.3812 Email bklein@blackridgeco.com Web blackridgeco.com From: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:10 AM To: Bryan Klein <bklein@blackridgeco.com> Subject: FW: Norton Sewer Outfall Call when you get a chance. Thanks, Matt Matt E. Ekstrom, PE Senior Land Development Engineer, Morrison-Maierle 406.922.6784 direct | 406.431.5819 mobile From: Matt E. Ekstrom Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 1:52 PM To: Bryan Klein <bklein@blackridgeco.com> Subject: FW: Norton Sewer Outfall We will take a look at the options Shawn presents below and get back to him. Thanks, Matt Matt E. Ekstrom, PE Senior Land Development Engineer, Morrison-Maierle 406.922.6784 direct | 406.431.5819 mobile From: Shawn Kohtz <SKohtz@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 10:41 AM To: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Cc: Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET>; Lance Lehigh <llehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>; Bob Murray <BMurray@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: RE: Norton Sewer Outfall ***This message originated from an External Source.*** Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Matt, Griffin is on vacation this week. Responding to your questions: 1. Generally we don’t oversize the sewer as suggested in Item 1 in your email below for all the reasons laid out in the Ten States Standards (Section 33), but I have another suggestion as an alternative: see the attached plans. There is a significant drop at the connection point of the Norton sewer project at Baxter Lane to make a connection to the existing system. It looks like over 3.5 feet of additional depth could be gained at manhole MH1A. There is another significant drop in the sewer design at the creek crossing in Baxter Meadows before reaching the intersection of Equestrian Lane and Arabian Avenue at Manhole MH3 (about 2’). There are two more drops near the intersection of Arabian Ave and Kimberwicke St (MH 6 and MH 10) depending on how far you want to chase the sewer downstream. I’ve not checked for conflicts for a deeper sewer at these locations, but at first glance the plans seems to indicate it is possible to deepen the sewer through these areas. Let us know how far you want to go downstream, and we will talk with Sanderson Stewart about the cost to redesign this portion of the Norton sewer. If NWX will cover the cost of redesign and the change order construction cost to deepen the sewer, we will have Sanderson Stewart start working on the design change. The clock is ticking on the Norton project. Manhole 10 is planned to be set in October, and Manhole 1A is planned to be set in mid November per the contractor’s current schedule. There is time to process a design change and change order, but it would need to happen fast. If NWX wants to pursue this, I suggest that NWX prepare a draft agreement that we can have City Legal review and while that is happening provide a payment to the City for the design change services for Sanderson Stewart’s work to get the ball rolling. Bob Murray and I will process the design change with Sanderson Stewart once we have payment for the design cost. NWX will need to let us know how far downstream you want to pursue deepened sewer to instruct Sanderson Stewart how far to redesign. Once the design change is complete, the City will ask the contractor for a change order price for the deepened sewer and forward that on to NWX. NWX would need to pay the change order cost to the City before we authorize the change order. Any other thoughts from this group? 2. It seems the logical point to chase the deepened sewer would be to Manhole 3. Thoughts? 3. Again, generally we don’t do this and DEQ doesn’t allow it for the reasons outlined in the Ten States Standards. However, the option outlined it Item 1 seems to allow for over 5’ additional depth at MH1A compared to the current design. 4. We have more time to answer this question depending on the NWX development timing. The City is in the process of updating the Community Plan and Future Land Use Map as well as the Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan. If that updated planning indicates the need for an increased line size due to increased density assumptions upstream, it may be justified to use a larger size but likely not as large as 27”. 5. Same commentary as the items outlined above. Thanks, City of Bozeman MT Shawn Kohtz, PE City Engineer 406.582.2280skohtz@bozeman.net From: Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 12:01 PM To: Shawn Kohtz <SKohtz@BOZEMAN.NET>; Bob Murray <BMurray@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: FW: Norton Sewer Outfall Bob, do we have an electronic set for Norton that I can kick over to Matt or could you send me the contact with Sanderson and Stewart who can provide the plans? I’m getting questions from Morrison-Maierle on the Norton Project and wanted to run my response by you guys before I send them over. I don’t know of anywhere in the City where we have an upstream sewer larger than downstream. 1) In regards to the Norton Davis sewer (first attachment) – could we go to a 33” pipe laid at min. slope (0.052%) instead of the proposed 27” at 0.15%? NWX would pay for the oversizing of the sewer main and any extra cost of the deeper install. – Upsizing may be consider provided the velocity and capacity requirements are met, however, - It may be consider but the M&M is response for the design work and we can’t approve changes which will delay the Norton project. 2) On the Norton Davis sewer. Could we start making the sewer deeper with the proposed MH in Questrian Lane? Could you get me the plan sheet showing this section of main? – We’ll get you the plans and let you run the numbers 3) Could we go to a 33” pipe at min. slope (0.052%) in Baxter Lane from the tie in of the Norton Davis sewer back to the corner of Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane (NE corner of the NWX project)? 1. It is approximately 1212’ from the tie into the Norton Davis line and the corner of Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane. If we have to say with the 27” at 0.15% (this is what the existing in in Baxter Lane is at) vs 33” pipe laid at min. slope (0.052%) – we would lose ~ 1’ in potential elevation we could use to get further to the west in Baxter Lane. The 33” pipe laid at min. slope (0.052%) will pass the Q=4210 gpm needed for this line. – Oversizing won’t be allowed. Jumping up pipe sizes maybe acceptable provided (as you mention above) that capacity and velocity requirements are met at min slope and pipe sizing only increases going downstream. 4) Could we oversize the proposed main in Baxter Lane (west of the intersection of Baxter Lane and Cottonwood Road) to a 27” line laid at min. slope (0.067%) to gain more vertical elevation? This would be larger than the Sewer Master Plan 15” main. In short no. We can’t oversize without justification and the only way to do this is with the Master Plan update. Redirecting flow in the master plan to justify the upgrade will rip through the downstream system likely causing the Norton sewer to be under sized. 5) This proposal would have a 33” pipe running into a 27” pipe – we would need a deviation from MDEQ to do this. If we had the COB support we think we could convince MDEQ to grant the deviation. – We can’t support the deviation. Thoughts? City of Bozeman MT Griffin Nielsen, PE| Engineering Department 406.582.2280 gnielsen@bozeman.net From: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 2:30 PM To: Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET> Cc: Bryan Klein <bklein@blackridgeco.com> Subject: RE: Norton Sewer Outfall Griffin, We are digging into the Baxter Lane gravity sewer option for NWX. I have a host of questions in regards to what the COB would allow for any proposed new line running from the Norton Davis 27” back to the NWX property. The second attached drawing shows the questions we have: 1) In regards to the Norton Davis sewer (first attachment) – could we go to a 33” pipe laid at min. slope (0.052%) instead of the proposed 27” at 0.15%? NWX would pay for the oversizing of the sewer main and any extra cost of the deeper install.2) On the Norton Davis sewer. Could we start making the sewer deeper with the proposed MH in Questrian Lane? Could you get me the plan sheet showing thissection of main? 3) Could we go to a 33” pipe at min. slope (0.052%) in Baxter Lane from the tie in of the Norton Davis sewer back to the corner of Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane (NE corner of the NWX project)? 1. It is approximately 1212’ from the tie into the Norton Davis line and the corner of Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane. If wehave to say with the 27” at 0.15% (this is what the existing in in Baxter Lane is at) vs 33” pipe laid at min. slope (0.052%) –we would lose ~ 1’ in potential elevation we could use to get further to the west in Baxter Lane. The 33” pipe laid at min.slope (0.052%) will pass the Q=4210 gpm needed for this line. 4) Could we oversize the proposed main in Baxter Lane (west of the intersection of Baxter Lane and Cottonwood Road) to a 27” line laid at min. slope (0.067%) to gainmore vertical elevation? This would be larger than the Sewer Master Plan 15” main. 5) This proposal would have a 33” pipe running into a 27” pipe – we would need a deviation from MDEQ to do this. If we had the COB support we think we could convince MDEQ to grant the deviation. Thanks and let me know if you have questions or would want to get together to discuss this information. Regards,Matt Matt E. Ekstrom, PE Senior Land Development Engineer, Morrison-Maierle 406.922.6784 direct | 406.431.5819 mobile From: Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 11:05 AM To: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Subject: FW: Norton Sewer Outfall ***This message originated from an External Source.*** Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Matt, I grabbed Bob and pulled the design report for Norton Davis. Here is a link to a file share for the doc, let me know if you can access it: https://bzncloud.bozeman.net/s/yCgWFK5mN4X5zGn Looks like the 27” line needs a min of 0.15% to convey the demand so there may still be some wiggle room on that section. Let me know what you come up with and we can start pulling the teams together. Thanks, City of Bozeman MT Griffin Nielsen, PE| Engineering Department 406.582.2280 gnielsen@bozeman.net From: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:21 PM To: Griffin Nielsen <GNielsen@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: Norton Sewer Outfall Griffin, We are still working on analyzing the sewer option of re-laying the 27” sewer in Baxter to allow NWX to gravity sewer vs the private lift station option. Anyway, I looking at SS plans (attached) – would it be possible to install the 459 LF of 27” sewer shown on the attached drawing at minimum grade (S=0.067%) vs what they areshowing? This would almost pick up another 1.0’ of depth that would translate back to the manhole at the corner of Cottonwood and Baxter. They may have a reason for running it atthis slope? Thanks, Matt Matt E. Ekstrom, PE Senior Land Development Engineer, Morrison-Maierle 406.922.6784 direct | 406.431.5819 mobile From: mhodges@m-m.net <mhodges@m-m.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:27 PM To: Matt E. Ekstrom <mekstrom@m-m.net> Subject: Message from CAD_Color City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’sConstitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and thecontents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as informationrelated to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’sConstitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and thecontents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as informationrelated to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law.