Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-15-20 City Commission Packet Materials - A5. Ord 2063 Entrance Facing the StreetMemorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Martin Matsen, AICP, Director of Community Development Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Tom Rogers, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT:Ordinance 2063, Provisional Adoption Amending Section 38.360.210 of the Bozeman Municipal Code to Clarify that a Residential Front Door Must Face the Street and Providing an Effective Date MEETING DATE:December 15, 2020 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Ordinance RECOMMENDATION:Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20147 and move to provisionally adopt Ordinance 2063. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: The City processes hundreds of applications each year. As the code is applied to those applications issues may appear where applicants and designers understand the code differently than City Staff. The Staff monitors for those “frequent flier” issues that consume considerable staff resources to resolve. These indicate issues to understand where the code is not adequately clear. Section 38.360.210.A states the purpose of this code provision is to, “to enhance the character of the street, maintain "eyes on the street" for safety to pedestrians and to create a more welcoming and interesting streetscape, and to de-emphasize garages and drive aisles as major visual elements along the street.” More specifically to require a, “clear and obvious pedestrian access between the sidewalk and a building entry that faces the street is required for new dwellings (the driveway may be used to help meet this requirement).” 281 A small number of applications show entrances and doors facing a side yard. The City defines how a structure addresses the dimensional attributes of the property to ensure minimizing impacts on adjacent properties, providing for sufficient room for residential activity, on site circulation, provision of utilities, and other minimum standards. These standards ensure a functional lot that promotes community desires and private use. The proposed amendment clarifies the standard previously adopted and enforced through the building permit review process. In addition to the proposed code amendments, parking and garage standards for single, two, three, and four-household structures will be relocated. The City has seen more out of state design and development firms working in our community and in an effort to streamline processing of building permits and reduce staff time responding to query’s relating to design standards for these structures, we will comingle parking and garage standards with the entrance standards. Specifically, move section 38.350.070 to section 38.360.220. Subsequent sections are renumbered. There are no changes to the standard. Currently there is a reference in 38.360.210.D to look for these standards above. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:1. Provisional adoption of the ordinance with modifications to the recommended ordinance, 2. Denial of the ordinance based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 3. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS: No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Amendment. Attachments: Commission Staff Report for Application 20147 for Ord 2063 Entryway Face Street.docx Ordinance 2063, Provisional Entryway facing street CC V2.docx Public comment Riggs comment 11-23-202.pdf Public comment UDC Platform - Front Doors - 11.23.20 Comment - RJP e.pdf 282 Report compiled on: December 7, 2020 283 Page 1 of 12 20147 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment, Ordinance 2063 Public Hearings:Zoning Commission meeting is on November 23, 2020. City Commission meeting is on December 15, 2020. Project Description:Clarify the intent of a portion of Ordinance No. 1978 stating that building entries must face the street for new single, two, three, and four-household dwellings. No changes to dimensional standards are included with this amendment. Revise affected sections to implement the revisions. Project Location:Revision to the text is applicable City-wide Recommendation: Meets standards for approval. Recommended Zoning Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20147 and move to recommend approval of Ordinance 2063. Recommended City Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 20147 and move to provisionally adopt Ordinance 2063. Report:November 17, 2020 Staff Contact:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Agenda Item Type:Action -Legislative EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is based on the application materials submitted and public comment received to date. Unresolved Issues None. Project Summary A lack of sufficient clarity has been identified relating to intent and specific code language requiring that all new single, two, three, and four household dwellings must be configured that the entryway door must be visible and face the street or other authorized frontage. It is 284 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 2 of 12 important for the City’s regulations to be clear and effective, especially for residential development that fosters the integrated neighborhoods that encourage safe and inviting homes. The amendments improve existing language and clarity for residential entries. There is no change to the physical dimensions or other standards. This amendment is a clarification and does not change how standards were previously applied or are applied at this time. In addition to building entrances there are other standards that that relate to single, two, three, and four-household construction. Every attempt to comingle related standards are made to ensure all requirements are clearly conveyed to our customers. However, improvements can be made. Feedback from our customers identified a possible improvement to the organization of these standards. Based on these comments parking and garage standards will be moved from section 38.350.070 to 38.360.220. There are no changes to the standard, only there location. Currently there is a reference in 38.360.210.D to look for these standards above. Strategic Plan 4.1 Informed Conversation on Growth Continue developing an in-depth understanding of how Bozeman is growing and changing and proactively address change in a balanced and coordinated manner. 4.2 High Quality Urban Approach Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approached to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. Zoning Commission The Zoning commission held a public hearing on the proposed text amendment on November 23, 2020. Two written and one oral public comments were made on the proposed Ordinance. Comments opposed the clarification to the existing standard stating that the standard would increase costs, reduce housing types, and stifle creativity. Responding to public comment and Zoning Commission discussion Staff added a departure option to the standard to address some of the issues raised. Data does not support the reduction in certain housing types by this development standard. See finding A under Section 2 of this report for additional analysis. In conclusion, the Zoning Commission voted 1:3 to recommend approval as submitted. As full video recording of the proceedings can be reviewed at the link below. https://media.avcaptureall.com/session.html?sessionid=371be454-ef54-4595-bf43- c27367d0499d&prefilter=654,3835 285 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 3 of 12 City Commission Alternatives 1. Provisional adoption of the ordinance with modifications to the recommended ordinance; 2. Denial of the ordinance based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 3. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff to supply additional information or to address specific items. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 Unresolved Issues............................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary................................................................................................................. 1 Strategic Plan...................................................................................................................... 2 Zoning Commission............................................................................................................ 2 City Commission Alternatives............................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ........................................ 4 SECTION 2 - TEXT AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS....................... 4 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS......................................................... 10 APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND.............. 11 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT.................................................... 11 APPENDIX C - APPLICANT INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF .................... 12 FISCAL EFFECTS................................................................................................................. 12 ATTACHMENTS................................................................................................................... 12 286 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 4 of 12 SECTION 1 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Having considered the criteria established for a zone text amendment, the Staff recommends approval as submitted. The Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this amendment on November 23, 2020, at 6 p.m. and voted 1:3 to forward a recommendation to the Commission on the Zone Text amendment. The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the Zone Text Amendment on December 15, 2020, at 6 p.m. SECTION 2 - TEXT AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission must consider the following criteria (letters A-K). As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. A zone text amendment must be in accordance with the growth policy (criteria A) and be designed to secure safety from fire and other dangers (criteria B), promote public health, public safety, and general welfare (criteria C), and facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements (criteria D). Therefore, to approve a zone text amendment the Commission must find Criteria A-D are met. In addition, the Commission must also consider criteria E-K, and may find the zone text amendment to be positive, neutral, or negative with regards to these criteria. To approve the zone text amendment, the Commission must find the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E-K. In determining whether the criteria are met, Staff considers the entire body of regulations for land development. Standards which prevent or mitigated negative impacts are incorporated throughout the entire municipal code but are principally in Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A. Be in accordance with a growth policy. Yes. The Bozeman Community Plan 2020, Chapter 5, p. 73, in the section titled Review Criteria For Zoning Amendments And Their Application, discusses how the various criteria in 76-2-304 MCA are applied locally. Application varies depending on whether an amendment is for the zoning text or for the text of Chapter 38, BMC. 287 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 5 of 12 “In a text amendment, policy statements weigh heavily as the standards being created or revised implement the growth policy’s aspirations and intent. The City must balance many issues in approving urban development.” The basic planning precepts, page 20, includes “The health and well-being of the public is an essential focus and influences and is influenced in turn by urban design and land development.” Clarity of meaning and application helps ensure consistent application of existing standards as new applications are submitted. This supports balance and harmonious coexistence for existing and new development. Promoting a well-planned, walkable community, Goal N-1, that fosters Bozeman’s sense of place, Goal N-4, is grounded on human interaction and connection as well as the physical built environment. Doors and windows are the points of connection between the private areas of homes and the public areas of streets, sidewalks, and open spaces. Connection to the public realm of the street or drive isle is paramount to ensure we have neighborhood cohesion and “eye’s on the street.” Being “walkable” was one of the top ten attributes Bozeman residents identified as what they want Bozeman to be in 2040 (page A-3). They also identified walkability as part of unique neighborhoods as part of the review of Themes (page A-6). Being walkable is part of the essential nature Neighborhood as defined in the growth policy (page F-2). A related definition is “Pedestrian Oriented. Development designed with an emphasis on pedestrian safety, convenience and accessibility that is equal to or greater than the emphasis given to automotive access and convenience.” Housing types other than single detached household continue to surge with in the City limits. Housing types include apartments, multi-household, townhouse and row hothouses. Data culled from the Building Division shows detached single household residential (SHR) to Townhomes is at about 7:1 (14%) between Jan 1, 2018 and Nov 10, 2020 with 165 townhouse type structures over this period. Additionally, townhome/rowhouse construction is dispersed throughout the community. These structures have been constructed on 21 different street names. This proposed amendment improves clarity of meaning and consistency of application. No conflicts with the growth policy text or future land use map have been identified. B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. Yes. Previously adopted standards in Chapter 38, BMC address this criteria. Those standards are not being changed. Construction of new and renovated structures requires review and approval of applicable building codes. 288 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 6 of 12 C.Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare. Yes. Front entrances serve multiple purposes. Front entrances facing the street or other authorized frontage provide a clear connection to the street and convey the location of the door for emergency responders, guests, service providers, and provide clear access for those with less mobility. Front entrances facing the street continues Bozeman’s long tradition of placing entries to the public space as described in Chapter 3 of the Bozeman Guidelines for Historic Preservation and the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (adopted as a part of the Community Plan). All of these purposes advance public well-being. Street facing entrances in conjunction with covered entries decreases the probability of slippery surfaces at the building entrance, in colder months, because of solar access to the entry area. No changes to dimensions of required setbacks in individual districts are changed with this amendment. All established setbacks have been found to meet this criteria. D.Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. Yes. The City conducts extensive planning for municipal transportation, water, sewer, parks, and other facilities and services provided by the City. The adopted plans allow the City to consider existing conditions and identify enhancements needed to provide additional service needed by new development. The City implements these plans through its capital improvements program that identifies individual projects, project construction scheduling, and financing of construction. Schools are provided by School District 7 and allowed uses are not affected by this amendment. E.Reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Yes. As noted in criterion C, street facing entrances improves solar access and creates a more direct access to the building. Front setbacks are greater than side setbacks allowing more light to reach the entrance than a side yard or building entrance. No changes to dimensions of required setbacks in individual districts are changed with this amendment. All established setbacks have been found to meet this criteria. F.The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems. Neutral. The proposed amendment does not modify development standards for circulation, parking, traffic control, or other standards related to this criteria. G.Promotion of compatible urban growth. Yes. Establishment of pedestrian hierarchy is an important component of connectivity, urban scale, safety, and a neighborhood. Delineating entrances is a critical piece of establishing where and how people relate and access housing and all other commercial and industrial structures. The interface between streets and buildings is a key element in defining site 289 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 7 of 12 character, coordinating utility locations, and other elements of compatibility. The proposed amendment brings improved clarity and consistency to several related standards affecting street, block, and neighborhood character and function. H.Character of the district. Yes. Section 76-2-302, MCA says “…legislative body may divide the municipality into districts of the number, shape, and area as are considered best suited to carry out the purposes [promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community] of this part.” Emphasis added. This proposal amends the text, not the zoning map. The intent and purpose of residential zoning districts, section 38.300.100, is to establish areas within the city that are primarily residential in character and to set forth certain minimum standards for development within those areas. The purpose in having more than one residential district is to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types and arrangements within the community while providing a basic level of predictability. The City is authorized to adopt standards establishing character of a district. A variety of visual cues define character of a building. These character traits can be both descriptive and prescriptive. Bozeman’s development code focuses on the physical attributes to ensure our residential areas promote and maintain the particular neighborhood character of the area. Planning policies impact upon the way a place is used and what it feels like to be there, along with a range of other social, cultural, ecological, physical and economic factors that shape human settlements. Residential character has consistently been a profound point of discussion in the community. Entryways to buildings are an essential element of building character. The City has been evolving its zoning standards to a more form based code which focuses more on the design of the building and less on the use. Objective DCD-4.3 encourages this to continue. As shown in Article 38.5, the primary design portion of the zoning standards, the location and configuration of entryways is an essential part of form based code. Cohesive neighborhood character enriches the experience of the neighborhood, and it is important that development does not erode residential character wherever it is identified. Delineating the location of an entrance maintains one of the primary prescriptive standards used to support Bozeman’s character. Illustration: 290 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 8 of 12 291 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 9 of 12 The great majority of Bozeman homes have doors oriented to the street or other authorized frontage. This amendment maintains that pattern established in areas with large or small, new or old, single or grouped homes. Some homes scattered throughout the community do not have doors oriented to the street or other authorized frontage. This amendment does not require any change to those homes. Bozeman has a long history of designing and constructing homes with street facing entries. This attribute is one of the primary influences of Bozeman’s sense of place and neighborhood 292 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 10 of 12 character. The Extreme History Project provides a photo history of Bozeman’s architectural vernacular and shows the evolution of architectural styles over time. Regardless of the current desired architectural style, certain elements connect our community and define Bozeman, including street facing entrances. I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses. Neutral. No changes to allowed uses in zoning districts happen with this amendment. No changes to dimensions of required setbacks in individual districts are changed with this amendment. All established setbacks have been found to meet this criteria. J. Conserving the value of buildings. Neutral. Although this language refinement clarifies existing residential building standards, the change will only apply to applications occurring after adoption, should adoption occur. K.Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area. Neutral. The proposed amendment does not alter allowed uses in zoning districts or the zoning map. Consistency of regulations does make it easier to plan for and execute development throughout the City. PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION. The City will accept written protests from property owners against the proposal described in this report until the close of the public hearing before the City Commission. Pursuant to 76-2-305, MCA, a protest may only be submitted by the owner(s) of real property within the area affected by the proposal or by owner(s) of real property that lie within 150 feet of an area affected by the proposal. The protest must be in writing and must be signed by all owners of the real property. In addition, a sufficient protest must: (i) contain a description of the action protested sufficient to identify the action against which the protest is lodged; and (ii) contain a statement of the protestor's qualifications (including listing all owners of the property and the physical address), to protest the action against which the protest is lodged, including ownership of property affected by the action. Signers are encouraged to print their names after their signatures. A person may in writing withdraw a previously filed protest at any time prior to final action by the City Commission. Protests 293 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 11 of 12 must be delivered to the Bozeman City Clerk, 121 North Rouse Ave., PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The City processes hundreds of applications each year. As the code is applied to those applications issues may appear where applicants and designers understand the code differently than City Staff. The Staff monitors for those “frequent flier” issues that consume considerable staff resources to resolve. These indicate issues to understand where the code is not adequately clear. Section 38.360.210.A states the purpose of this code provision is to, “to enhance the character of the street, maintain "eyes on the street" for safety to pedestrians and to create a more welcoming and interesting streetscape, and to de-emphasize garages and drive aisles as major visual elements along the street.” More specifically to require a, “clear and obvious pedestrian access between the sidewalk and a building entry that faces the street is required for new dwellings (the driveway may be used to help meet this requirement).” A small number of applications show entrances and doors facing a side yard. The City defines how a structure addresses the dimensional attributes of the property to ensure minimizing impacts on adjacent properties, providing for sufficient room for residential activity, on site circulation, provision of utilities, and other minimum standards. These standards ensure a functional lot that promotes community desires and private use. The proposed amendment clarifies the standard previously adopted and enforced through the building permit review process. In addition to the proposed code amendments, parking and garage standards for single, two, three, and four-household structures will be relocated. The City has seen more out of state design and development firms working in our community and in an effort to streamline processing of building permits and reduce staff time responding to query’s relating to design standards for these structures, we will comingle parking and garage standards with the entrance standards. Specifically, move section 38.350.070 to section 38.360.220. Subsequent sections are renumbered. There are no changes to the standard. Currently there is a reference in 38.360.210.D to look for these standards above. APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice for text amendments must meet the standards of 38.220.410 & 420. Notice was published in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle as required and contained all required elements. Notice was provided at least 15 days before the Zoning Commission public hearing, and not 294 Staff Report for the Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment Page 12 of 12 more than 45 days prior to the City Commission public hearing. Hearing dates are on the first page of this report. APPENDIX C - APPLICANT INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Applicant:City of Bozeman, PO Box 1230, Bozeman MT 59771 Representative:Department of Community Development, City of Bozeman, PO Box 1230, Bozeman MT 59771 Report By:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Ordinance 2063 295 Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. 2063 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA AMENDING SECTION 38.360.210 OF THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THAT A RESIDENTIAL FRONT DOORS MUST FACE THE STREET AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman (the “City”) has adopted land development and use standards to protect public health, safety and welfare and otherwise execute the purposes of Section 76-2-304, MCA; and WHEREAS,the City has adopted land development regulations since at least 1934 and has amended them from time to time to respond to changes in state law, legal decisions, and changing community needs; and WHEREAS,the current language in section 38.360.210 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) could be read to require only the pedestrian access to face the street; and WHEREAS,the purposes stated in section 38.360.210.A., particularly the purposes of maintaining “eyes on the street” for safety to pedestrians and to create a more welcoming and interesting streetscape and to de-emphasize garages and driveways as major visual elements along the street, support amending the UDC to require that the front door, rather than just the pedestrian access, face the street; and WHEREAS,it is in the interests of the City and public welfare to provide users of the UDC with more certainty in interpreting requirements in the UDC; 296 Ordinance 2063, Clarifying that residential entryways must face the street, amending section 38.360.210 BMC Page 2 of 5 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA: Section 1 That section 38.360.210 – Single, two, three, and four-household dwellings be amended as follows: Sec. 38.360.210 –Single, two, three, and four-household dwellings. A. Purpose. 1. To enhance the character of the street. 2. To maintain "eyes on the street" for safety to pedestrians and to create a more welcoming and interesting streetscape. 3. To de-emphasize garages and drive aisles ways as major visual elements along the street. 4. To provide usable setback space for residents. 5. Top provide clear and safe pedestrian pathways connecting the street sidewalks to the dwelling entrances. B. Entries Front Door. 1.All dwellings that front onto a street, greenway corridor, or alternative lot frontage must have a front door that faces the street, greenway corridor, or alternative lot frontage. A front door that is located on an angle from 0 to 45 degrees offset from the parallel right of way line is deemed to be facing the street, greenway corridor, or alternative lot frontage. 2.A Cclear and obvious level and hard surfaced pedestrian access pathway between the sidewalk and a building entry front door that faces the street is required for new all dwellings (the concrete or asphalt driveway may be used to help meet this requirement). 3.All new dwellings must provide a covered pedestrian entry to the front door with minimum weather protection of three feet by three feet. 4. Departure criteria associated with front door location standard.Departures will be considered for doors that are greater than 45 degrees offset from the parallel right of way line provided the design meets all of the following criteria: a. The alternative front door placement meets the intent of Section 38.360.210 BMC; and b. The front building façade includes ground floor transparency; and c. The front building entry includes a covered porch or stoop that is a minimum of 36 square feet in area. 297 Ordinance 2063, Clarifying that residential entryways must face the street, amending section 38.360.210 BMC Page 3 of 5 C.Residential garages. 1.Where lots abut an alley, it may be necessary to take access from alley to meet another standard in the municipal code. 2.See section 38.350.070 38.360.220 for garage location and design standards. D.Driveway access standards.See section 38.400.090. E.Minimum useable open space for alley-loaded lots.All new alley-loaded dwelling units must provide a contiguous open space within the side or rear yard with a minimum dimension of 15 feet on all sides. The open space(s) must be equivalent to ten percent (minimum) of the lot size (excluding area within an adjacent alley or right-of-way). For example, a 6,000 square foot lot would require a contiguous open space of at least 600 square feet, or 20 feet by 30 feet in area. Drive aisles do not count in the calculations for usable open space. Additions must not create or increase any nonconformity with this standard. Section 2 Repealer. All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3 Savings Provision. This ordinance does not affect the rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred or proceedings that were begun before the effective date of this ordinance. All other provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code not amended by this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4 Severability. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so 298 Ordinance 2063, Clarifying that residential entryways must face the street, amending section 38.360.210 BMC Page 4 of 5 decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Bozeman Municipal Code as a whole. Section 5 Codification. This Ordinance shall be codified as indicated in Sections 1. Section 6 Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after final adoption. 299 Ordinance 2063, Clarifying that residential entryways must face the street, amending section 38.360.210 BMC Page 5 of 5 PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, on first reading at a regular session held on the ___ day of ________, 20__. ____________________________________ CYNTHIA L. ANDRUS Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk FINALLY PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana on second reading at a regular session thereof held on the ___ of ____________________, 20__. The effective date of this ordinance is ______________, 20__. _________________________________ CYNTHIA L. ANDRUS Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 300 1 Tom Rogers From:Susan Riggs <sriggs@groundprint.com> Sent:Monday, November 23, 2020 12:31 PM To:Agenda; Tom Rogers; Chris Saunders Subject:Public comment regarding UDC code edits - Front Doors I am writing to provide public comment for the code edit 20147 Front Door Must Face the Street Text Amendment, Ordinance 2063: · I do not support this amendment. · Our city is moving too much toward a "one-size fits all" monolithic approach to design. · Urban environments are not experienced from one specific building elevation. · The City's new growth policy defines "Missing Middle Housing" as: "...housing constructed in buildings which are of a size and design compatible in scale and form with detached individual homes. Example housing types include duplex, triplex, live-work, cottage housing, group living, row houses, townhouses, horizontally layered apartments, flats, and other similar configurations." A great example of missing middle housing is a building that looks like a single house but contains multiple units. Typically, only one front door is emphasized while the other unit front doors are intentionally deemphasized. The language, as proposed, appears to apply to all dwellings in a structure and would not support this type of creative solution to providing more housing. Thank you for the opportunity to participate. Susan Riggs, AICP www.groundprint.com 406.579.5844 301 23 November 2020 Bozeman City Commission Bozeman Zoning Commission City of Bozeman Department of Community Development Via Email RE: UDC Community Platform SUBJECT: Entryway Facing the Street Greetings - I am writing this letter to ask that, as part of the current UDC Community Platform process to improve the UDC, and in an attempt to clarify the intent of the standard that mandates residential entries must face the street that you please do not require that a FRONT DOOR must face a street. The current code passages for entries are suitable and allow for a variety of design responses: B. Entries. 1. Clear and obvious pedestrian access between the sidewalk and a building entry that faces the street is required for new dwellings (the driveway may be used to help meet this requirement). 2. All new dwellings must provide a covered pedestrian entry with minimum weather protection of three feet by three feet. It is perfectly common that an actual front door that does not face the street can still present a fronting condition and otherwise celebrate an entryway. There are many good programmatic and aesthetic reasons why entry doors sometimes do not face the street. Besides, variety makes for a more interesting cityscape. Please see attached examples illustrating several historic and contemporary compositions. Thank you for your careful considerations, Robert J. Pertzborn, AIA 433 North Black Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 rpertzborn@intrinsikarchitecture.com 406-580-0422 Attachments 302 303 304 305 306 307 308