HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-20-20 City Commission Packet Materials - WS1. Bozeman Community Plan 2020 Supplemental Materials 2 Revised Staff Memo w Recommended Revisions to PB Draft
TO: BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION
FROM: TOM ROGERS, SENIOR PLANNER
CHRIS SAUNDERS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
RE: UPDATED RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO PLANNING BOARD DRAFT OF THE BOZEMAN COMMUNITY PLAN 2020
DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2020
The draft presented to the City Commission from the Planning Board was completed on August 10, 2020. Since then, Staff has continued to review the document and outside influences have continued. Therefore, Staff will continue to monitor for potential changes to the draft needed to
respond to these issues. The following have been identified to date. Additional items will be noted and included as part of the packet for each Commission meeting as the review of the growth policy continues. Recommended revisions:
1. Revise the signature page to reflect the current positions on the City Commission.
2. Revise the list on page 9 to replace the reference to the Gallatin Triangle Planning Study with the recently completed Triangle Community Plan and revise Appendix B accordingly for the description of the Triangle Community Plan. Reflect this change throughout the document
3. Update Table 2 data to account for more recent information available since initial plan development.
4. Revise the list on page 9 to update the title for the housing action plan and the date most recently amended by the City Commission.
5. Revise context map on page 38 to include the Triangle Community Plan boundary. The TCP
was adopted after the preparation of the map.
6. Revise future land use map for Sacajawea Audobon property by E. Main interchange. Property was purchased after map preparation and is not intended for development as shown on the future land use map at this time. Landowner has verbally supported this change.
7. Revise future land use map boundaries to smooth edges, align with street centerlines where
appropriate, and perform general cleanup of the boundaries. No changes will occur with this work that change the designation on a parcel.
8. Page 48, remove implementing zoning dot for NEHMU zoning district from Industrial future land use category to reflect the Planning Board’s designation of that area as Community Commercial Mixed Use.
9. Page 53, add US Census and ACS to source data list for Housing Stock Diversity metric.
10. Page 54, add “Measures private sector performance” to the notes for Percent of Application Materials Containing All Information Needed metric
11. Page 54, Staff suggests dropping the indicator on implementing the Triangle Community
Plan. Unlike the other indicators it does not lend itself to a numeric measure or target, does not have a repeatable data source, and most of the Triangle Community Plan area is outside of the City’s control. Objective RC-1.5 remains to ensure that the need for the effort is not forgotten. At this time, the Parks Department is working with others to support Gallatin County’s efforts in the development of a trails plan for the Triangle area.
12. Update Appendix A for public outreach conducted during the public review process.
13. Correct all typographic, spelling, grammar, or layout errors. Additional items after initial October 20th packet submittal
14. Page 25, add Integrated Water Resources Plan to list of “Other Relevant Plans”.
15. Change FLUM at the Southeast Corner of Highland Boulevard and Kagy Boulevard from Public Institutions to Urban Neighborhood.
16. Page 43, Revise 2nd paragraph of the FLUM description as follows:
The future land use map is not limited to conditions or needs expected within a certain number of years. It depicts what, at whatever time the land changes use, what the City sees as the best long term use. It may take many plan update cycles before the depicted conditions on the future land use map occur. The Planning Area boundary and development
opportunities are coordinated with the City’s water and sewer plans. These plans are periodically updated. The Planning Area boundary and capacity should be reviewed to accommodate changes in these plans. Due to limitations of scale and ability to predict the nuances of land development, the water bodies and streams are not depicted nor are the locations of future parks.