Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-08-27.19230, 19231 Bozeman East Mixed-Use MSP, SP Ph 1 & II_RPAB Sub Rev Memo-DRAFT MEMORANDUM – DRAFT* TO: Community Development FROM: Addi Jadin, Park Planning and Development Manager Mitch Overton, Parks and Recreation Director DATE: August 27, 2020 SUBJECT: 19230 and 19231 Bozeman East Mixed-Use Development Master Site Plan and Phase 1 & II SP/CUP *Draft to be updated with recommended comments or conditions suggested by the Subdivision Review Committee Summary of Parkland Proposal The parkland proposal is summarized in application document “2.5_Boz East Mixed-Use Development Review Narrative” on pages 4-6. The proposal includes 1. Waiver of Required Park Dedication for 0.82 acres and public access easement in Phase 1 2. Improvements in Lieu of Parkland (IILP) in Phase 1 3. Cash-in-lieu of Parkland (CILP) in Phase 2 Prior review by Parks Division staff indicated that Cash-in-lieu of Parkland would likely be supported in this infill area. Review Comments and Discussion Items: 1. Net residential density as defined in Sec. 38.700.130.-N omits additional lands from the net area calculation including conservation easements and common open spaces. Please reduce net lot area and parkland calculations accordingly. Staff estimates that 3.25 acres is required as a combination of land and cash-in-lieu. 2. Per 38.420.020.1.a. and 1.d.(3) the equivalent of 8 du/acre is required as land and 4 du/acre is provided as CILP. The waiver request is to reduce the proportion of land and increase the cash- or improvements-in-lieu. 3. Improvements-in-lieu comments: • Per 38.420.070.A.1 Improvements in Lieu provided in the parkland tracking table on “Exhibit X-4” may include the cost of construction Class II or III recreational trails. Related facilities as mentioned in 38.400.110.C may also be counted toward improvements in lieu such as appropriate street crossings with curb ramps, crosswalk, signage; trail signage; • Staff is researching whether other improvements-in-lieu on lands not owned by the City may be applied to the parkland requirements. • Standard park improvement costs (irrigation, street trees, linear park trees @ 1 per 50’, sod, etc) and costs associated with other standards (wetland setback plantings) may not be counted twice.