HomeMy WebLinkAbout20116 Staff Report Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 1 of 15
Application No. 20116 Type Site Plan for change of use to allow Group Living quarters
Project Name Blueprint Group Living
Summary A Site Plan application for conversion of two dwelling units on a single lot in an R-3 zone to a
group living facility for occupancy for a total of 13 teen youths and 1 adult on-site manager.
The
Zoning R-3 Growth
Policy
Community Commercial Mixed Use Parcel Size 10,500 square feet (sf)
Overlay District(s) None.
Street Address 214 and 216 N. 15th Avenue, Bozeman, MT
Legal Description Lot 11 of the Cleveland Addition Major Subdivision
Owner Human Resource Development Council (HRDC); 32 S. Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715
Attention: Ms. Heather Grenier; hgrenier@thehdrc.org
Applicant Same
Representative Ms. Susan Riggs; GroundPrint, 1262 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718;
sriggs@groundprint.com
Staff Planner Susana Montana Engineer Anna Russell
Noticing Public Comment Period Site Posted Adjacent Owners
Mailed
Newspaper Legal Ad
5/22/20 to 6/6/20 05/22/20 05/22/20 NA
Advisory Boards Board Date Recommendation
Development Review
Committee (DRC)
05/20/2020 The application is adequate, conforms to standards,
and is sufficient for approval with conditions and
code provisions.
Recommendation The application is adequate, conforms to standards, and is sufficient for approval with conditions and
code provisions as noted below.
Decision Authority Director Martin Matsen Date June 26, 2020
Full application and file of record: Community Development Department, 20 E. Olive St., Bozeman, MT 59715
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 2 of 15
FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPEAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE
A) PURSUANT to Chapter 38, Article 2, Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC), and other applicable sections of Ch.38, BMC, public
notice was given, opportunity to submit comment was provided to affected parties, and a review of the Site Plan described in
this report was conducted. The Applicant proposed to the City a Site Plan (SP) to permit the conversion of two dwelling units
to a group living facility on a lot in the R-3 Residential Medium Density District. The purpose of the Site Plan review was to
consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety, welfare, and the other purposes of Ch. 38, BMC; to evaluate the
proposal against the criteria of Sec. 38.230.100 BMC and the standards of Ch. 38, BMC; and to determine whether the
application should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied.
B) All parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed Site Plan and offer comment were provided the opportunity to
do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory body established by Ch. 38, Art. 210, BMC, and considering
all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment period defined by Ch. 38, BMC, the Director
has found that the proposed Site Plan complies with the requirements of the BMC. The Applicant has demonstrated, based on
actual vehicle ownership at a similar project elsewhere in the City, that only 28 percent of the teen residents are likely to own
and use a vehicle and, therefore, seeks a reduction in the on-site parking requirement from 14 spaces to 6 spaces. Based on
that similar vehicle use pattern, 4 off-street parking spaces would be needed for the student residents plus one space for the
resident manager. Therefore, being fully advised of all matters having come before him regarding this application, the Director
makes the following decision.
C) The Site Plan meets the criteria of Ch. 38, BMC, and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listed in this report and
the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the BMC. The reduced parking from 14 off-street
spaces to 6 spaces is hereby granted. The evidence contained in the submittal materials, advisory body review, public
testimony, and this report, justifies the conditions imposed on this development to ensure that the Site Plan complies with all
applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Ch. 38, BMC. On this 26th day of June, 2020, Martin Matsen, Director of
Community Development, approved with conditions this Site Plan for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman as authorized by
Sec. 38.200.010, BMC.
D) This Director of Community Development’s project decision may be appealed by filing a documented appeal with and paying
an appeal fee to the Clerk of the Commission for the City of Bozeman within 10 working days after the date of the final decision
as evidenced by the Director’s signature, following the procedures of Sec. 38.250.030, BMC.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The Applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions
of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman
Municipal Code or State law.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 3 of 15
CODE PROVISIONS
1. BMC 38.420.030. Cash dedication in-lieu of land dedication. The Applicant must submit a cash-in-lieu of parkland
request addressing the criteria of Resolution 4784 for review by the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board (RPAB)
Subdivision Review Committee in the amount of $1,779.84.
Figure 1: Current Zoning Map
Site is zoned R-3, Residential Median Density District
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 4 of 15
Figure 2: Location map
214-216 N. 15th Avenue; south of W. Beall Street
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 5 of 15
Figure 3: Vicinity Map
Figure 4: 214 N. 15th Avenue view of the Site
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 6 of 15
Figure 5: 216 N. 15th Avenue (rear structure), south and west elevation
Figure 6: Aerial view of the Site.
214
216
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 7 of 15
Figure 7: Proposed site plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 8 of 15
Analysis and Findings
Analysis and resulting recommendations based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards,
plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record
of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review.
Plan Review, Section 38.230.100, BMC
In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the Director of Community Development shall consider the
following:
1. Conformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy
38.100.040 B
Meets Code?
Growth Policy Land Use Community Commercial Mixed-use Yes
Zoning R-3 Yes
Comments: The proposed group living use is allowed as a Principal Use in the R-3 District pursuant to the Bozeman
Municipal Code (BMC) Section 38.310.030.A. Staff finds that the proposed affordable housing project serving teens
attending Bozeman High School positively addresses goals of the City’s growth policy because it positively
addresses Objective 1.1 of the City’s Community Plan/Growth Policy which seeks to provide a broad range of
housing types near transit. Objective 1-3 and 3-3 seek to provide a range of housing costs and Goal H-3 seeks an
increase in the supply of affordable housing for Bozeman residents. The proposed Group Living facility provides a
needed type of housing which is affordable to teen residents seeking to complete their high school education. .
2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current
violations 38.200.160
Meets Code?
Current Violations None Yes
Comments: There are no current violations on the subject property. There are two vacant single-household
dwellings on the property.
3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations
38.100.080
Meets Code?
Conflicts None Yes
Comments: The proposed use of the site is consistent with the allowed residential uses of the R-3 District
and the two residential structures would not change in appearance. A non-profit organization owns the
property and will manage the program, providing services to the residents and providing an on-site resident
manager. No specific conflicts have been identified. Staff of the Building Division of the Community
Development Department and the Fire Department will review the requirements of the International Building
Code and Fire Code for compliance at the time of building permit application submittal for the change of
occupancy and any interior improvements.
4. Conformance with Plan Review for applicable permit types as specified in
article 2 Section 38.230
Meets Code?
Site Plan Yes
Comments: Existing architectural design, building mass, building materials and character of both
buildings is not proposed to change and, therefore, would remain compatible with homes in the
immediate vicinity and neighborhood.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 9 of 15
5. Conformance with zoning provisions of Article 3, Section 38.320.100 Meets Code?
Permitted uses 38.310 Group Living facility Yes
Form and intensity standards 38.320 Yes
Zoning
R-3 Setbacks
(feet)
Structures Parking /
Loading
Yes
Front ~20 ft. -
Rear ~25 ft. 6 spaces
Side ~10 ft. on north side
~20 ft. on south side
-
Alley
access
NA -
Comments: The existing buildings’ setbacks meet all R-3 zone district standards.
Relationship to adjacent properties standards 38.520.030 (light and air access and
privacy) and angled setback plane 38.360.030
NA
Applicable zone specific or overlay standards 38.330-340 None
Building Height Requirements 38.320.010-.060
Lot coverage Existing: 56% lot
coverage allowed in
2001 when the
second unit was built
in the rear yard.
40% allowed Exceeds
limit by
16%
Height Existing: unknown.
214 house built in
1965; 216 house built
in 2001.
32-ft. allowed Unknown Unknown
Comments. Height: 214 is 1-story; 216 is 2-story; both of unknown specific height. No change is proposed.
Lot coverage: Existing development exceeds the 40% maximum but no change would occur by the proposal.
Any additional parking would not be paved. Lot coverage is comprised of the buildings, patio, driveway and
parking areas.
General land use standards and requirements 38.350 Yes
Comments: All encroachments are in conformance to standards. Yes
Applicable supplemental use criteria 38.360.135 Yes
Supplemental uses/type NA NA
Comments: The Applicant would provide a full-time, on-site, resident manager for the program, residing
in the 214 house. There is a sheltered transit stop across the street.
Wireless facilities 38.370 NA
Affordable Housing 38.380.010 NA
Affordable housing plan NA
Comments: The Applicant would establish and manage a rent structure compatible with the needs of the
formerly homeless high school students residing therein and affordable to those high school graduate
residents transitioning to independent living. The rear (#216) house would accommodate the graduating
high school students who would transition to community housing within 6 to 9 months after finding secure
employment. All 13 teen youth residents would be formerly homeless individuals and their
accommodations would be free-of-charge while in school. For graduates transitioning to independent
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 10 of 15
living, if charged rent, accommodations would be priced affordable to their low-income status and so they
can save for community housing.
6a(1). Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4:
Transportation facilities and access 38.400
Meets Code?
Street vision Yes Yes
Secondary access None
Traffic Impact Study /
LOS
NA Transportation grid
adequate to serve site
Yes Yes
Comments: A traffic study was not required by the Engineering Division. Vehicular access to the property
is from N. 15th Avenue exclusively. No alley access exists at this site. The drive access is from North 15th
Avenue and complies with street vision triangle standards.
Street dedication NA Yes
Drive access locations and widths Yes
Number of drive accesses 1 street Yes
Street easements NA
Special Improvement Districts No Yes
Comments: The single drive access is 25 feet in width and is not proposed to change. Drive access
requirements are met. No secondary access is required.
Parking requirements of 38.540
Required parking nonresidential NA Yes
Required parking residential – 1 space per resident occupant 14
Reductions nonresidential NA
Reductions residential per 38.540.050.1 (few auto ownership) and
38.540.050.A.1.b (affordable housing reduction)
NA
Provided parking off street (on-site) 6
On street parking (in front of Site) 1
Comments: The Applicant has provided the Director with a parking study which is based on actual vehicle
ownership and use by teen residents at a similar group living facility in the City. The parking demand at
that facility, based on 6 years of operating experience, reveals that only 28 percent of residents owned or
used a vehicle and parked it at the residence. The proposed Site has on-site parking for 6 spaces, which
the Director deems sufficient to accommodate the parking demand of this project.
6a(2). Conformance with the community design provisions of Article 4:
Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress, Sec. 38.400
Meets Code?
Design of the pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems to assure that pedestrians
and vehicles can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties
and activities within the neighborhood area
Yes
Vehicle accesses to site 1 Yes
Pedestrian access location(s) Yes
Site vision triangles Yes
Fire lanes, curbs, signage and striping NA
Non-automotive transportation and circulation systems, design features to enhance
convenience and safety across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to
paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lighting
Yes
Crosswalks NA
Curb ramps Yes
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 11 of 15
Pedestrian lighting Yes
Comments: There is an existing driveway curb cut with compliant street vision triangles on both sides. There
is a concrete walkway from the ROW sidewalk to the front door of house #214. There is a sheltered transit
stop across the street and a crosswalk is located 190-linear ft. to the north at W. Beall Street.
Adequate connection and integration of the pedestrian and vehicular transportation
systems to the systems in adjacent development and the general community
Yes
Access easements NA NA
Dedication of right-of-way or easements necessary for pedestrian, shared use
pathway and similar transportation facilities
NA
Comments: Not required for this application.
6a(3) Loading and Unloading areas Meets Code?
Loading and unloading area requirements 38.540.080 NA
Loading and unloading NA NA
First Berth (min. 70 feet
length, 12 feet in width and
14 feet in height)
NA NA
Additional Berths (min. 45
feet length)
NA NA
Comments: No off-street loading berths are required or needed for this use.
6b Community design and element provisions, Sec. 38.410 Meets Code?
Lot and block standards 38.410.040 NA
Rights-of-way for pedestrians alternative block delineation NA
Comments: This property is fully developed with a circa-1965 house in front (#214) and a circa-2001 house
in the rear (#216).No new structures are proposed, only a change in residential use.
Provisions for utilities including efficient public services and utilities 38.410.050-060 Yes
Municipal infrastructure requirements Yes
Easements (City and public utility rights-of-way etc.) NA
Water, sewer, and stormwater Yes
Other utilities (electric, natural gas, communications) Yes
CIL of water NA
Comments: Cash-in-lieu (CIL) for water was not required by the Engineering Division.
Site Surface Drainage and stormwater control 38.410.080 Yes
Location, design and capacity Yes
Landscaping per 38.410.080.H NA
Comments: Site is landscaped with grass and shrubs typical of a residential lot. No new stormwater
infrastructure landscaping is required.
Grading 38.410.080 NA
Maximum 1:4 slope requirements met NA
Comments: No grading is proposed.
6c. Park and recreation requirements, Sec. 38.420 Meets Code?
Enhancement of natural environment NA
Wildlife habitat or feeding area preservation NA
Maintenance of public park or public open space access NA
Park/Recreational area design NA
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 12 of 15
Parkland Cash-in-lieu for maximum known density not to exceed
27 persons/acre (ac.).
Yes, with
cash-in-lieu
contribution 0.24 ac. X 27 persons/ac. X 575 sf/person=3,726 sf
Less 2,613 sf credit for 2 existing homes= 1,113 sf
amount of parkland required X $1.60/sf=$1,779.84 cash-
in-lieu contribution.
Cash donation in-lieu(CIL) $1,779,84 Yes
Improvements in-lieu NA NA
Comments: No new parkland is proposed. Applicant proposes CIL of parkland to satisfy park
requirements. CIL of parkland is required per BMC 38.420.030.
7a-c. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5,
Compatibility, Design and Arrangement
Meets Code?
Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and the
adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to architectural
design, building mass, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character,
orientation of buildings on the site and visual integration
Yes
Block Frontage Standards 38.510 Yes,
Landscape
Frontage
Building Design 38.530 Yes
Location and design of service areas and mechanical equipment 38.520.070 Yes
Comments: Trash tote enclosure meets standards and is covered. A delineated pathway to the ROW
sidewalk is provided. Shared vehicular access is provided via a 25-ft.wide driveway.
Design and arrangement of the elements of the plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open
space and landscaping, etc.) so that activities are integrated with the organizational
scheme of the community, neighborhood, and other approved development and produce
an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive development
Yes
Relationship to adjacent properties 38.520.030 Yes
Non-motorized circulation and design 38.520.043 Yes
Vehicular circulation and parking 38.520.050 Yes
Comments: All of these elements exist with the two dwellings and would not change with the Group Living
use.
Design and arrangement of elements of the plan (e.g., buildings circulation, open
space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography, natural
water bodies and water courses, existing vegetation, and to contribute to the overall
aesthetic quality of the site configuration
Yes
Site Planning and Design Elements 38.520 Yes
Comments: All of these elements exist and are not proposed to change.
7d. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Landscaping
including the enhancement of buildings, appearance of vehicular use, open
space and pedestrian area and the preservation or replacement of natural
vegetation
Meets Code?
Submittal requirements for landscape plans 38.220.100 Yes
Mandatory landscaping 38.550.050 Yes
Setback Yes
Additional screening NA
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 13 of 15
7g. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Signage
38.560
Meets Code?
Allowed (sq. ft)/building NA NA
Proposed (sq. ft) None
Comments: The only signage proposed at this time is the building address. No signage is approved with
this site plan application; a separate sign permit would be required prior to the installation of any other
signage.
Parking lot screening NA
Interior parking lot landscape NA
Off-street loading spaces screening NA
Street frontage Yes
Street median island NA
Acceptable landscape materials Yes
Protection of landscape areas Yes
Irrigation: plan, water source, system
type
Yes
Trees for residential adjacency NA
Performance points NA NA
City rights-of-way and parks Yes
Tree plantings for boulevard ROW, drought-resistant seed Yes
Public ROW boulevard strips NA
Irrigation and maintenance provisions for ROW NA
State ROW landscaping NA
Additional NA NA
Fencing and walls Yes NA
Comments: Street frontage landscaping complies with requirements.
Site planning and design required 38.520 Yes
Pedestrian area landscaping, including pathways and internal circulation 38.520.040 Yes
Internal roadway landscaping 38.520.050 NA
Open space landscaping 38.520.060 NA
Service area and mechanical equipment landscaping and screening 38.520.070 NA
Comments: Project meets requirements because the Site is landscaped with grass, shrubs and trees typical
of single-household dwellings in this neighborhood.
7e. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Open Space Meets Code?
Open Space Section 38.520.060 Yes
Total required 38 sf per 14 residents=518 sf --
Total provided 1,784 sf Yes
Comments: Open space is provided in the rear yard and the north side of both buildings.
7f. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Lighting 38.570 Meets Code?
Building-mounted lighting (cutoff and temperature) Yes
Site lighting (supports, cutoff and temperature) NA
Minimum light trespass at property line None
Comments: The residential entry building mounted lighting meets standards. No site lighting is proposed.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 14 of 15
8a-c. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives in Articles 4-
6 Meets Code?
Enhancement of natural environment: NA
Grading NA
On-site retention/detention Yes
Comments: Project meets requirements.
Drainage design Yes
Stormwater maintenance plan 38.410.030.A Yes
Stormwater feature: landscaping amenity, native species, curvilinear, 75% live
vegetation
NA
Comments:
Watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats NA
If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open
space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public
access to and use of that area
NA
Comments: NA
9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of Articles 4-6 Meets Code?
Watercourse setback 38.410.100 NA
Watercourse setback planting plan NA
Floodplain regulations 38.600 NA
Wetland regulations 38.610 NA
Comments: There are no flood designations or watercourses on this Site.
10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties,
Sec. 38.220
Meets Code?
Public Comment None Yes
Comments: The City received 59 email messages of support for this project, citing the need for affordable
housing for the vulnerable population of homeless teen students.
11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for
circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title, whether the
lots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the
approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to
become nonconforming OR Are the subject of reciprocal and perpetual
easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of
individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to
become nonconforming. 38.410.060
Meets Code?
Subdivision exemption NA NA
Required Easements NA NA
Reciprocal access and
shared parking easement
NA NA
Mutual access easement
and agreement
NA NA
Comments: Not applicable as the project is proposed on one lot.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9
Staff Report
Blueprint Group Living Facility Site Plan Review
Application 20116
June 26, 2020
Page 15 of 15
12. Phasing of development, Sec. 38.230.020.B including buildings and
infrastructure
Meets Code?
Phasing No # of phases Yes
Comments: No phasing is proposed for this project.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9B51C15-1CF4-4228-BE4A-BAF2025C7DF9