HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttach 2 - Metric edits 6-5-20201
Attachment 2 – Consolidated Board Edits –Metrics
Comment Source Staff Response
A City of Neighborhoods - Housing stock
diversity: How are we measuring diversity?
RR Measure may depend on purpose
and housing type. Intent has been
to finalize methods and details
after City Commission has accepted
the metric.
Discuss Metrics discussion –
no action at this time
Consider adding “Pedestrian-oriented
street intersections per square mile” to the
notes section of Intersection Density as a
way to explain this metric (you can also
keep what is already there about trails).
CC Prior Board discussion directed the
shorter listing in the plan with
more expansion descriptions as the
items are developed and measured.
Discuss Metrics discussion –
no action at this time
Under Commute Mode Share…what are we
measuring here? What do we want to
increase? Walking, biking, transit commute
trips? SOV commute trips?
CC Prior discussion directed the
shorter listing in the plan with
more expansion descriptions as the
items are developed and measured.
Previous discussion was on
documenting non-Single Occupant
Vehicle trips.
Discuss Metrics discussion –
no action at this time
A City Bolstered by Downtown and
Complementary Districts - Development vs
Redevelopment: Target is to increase
redevelopment but I'm not sure that is the
right measure. If redevelopment equates to
removing smaller more affordable housing
and replacing with larger less affordable
housing then this target makes other issues
RR Discuss Metrics discussion –
no action at this time
2
worse and is a failure. How are we
reinsuring that redevelopment is equating
to increased density or affordability?
A City Bolstered by Downtown and
Complementary Districts - Greenhouse Gas
Emissions: Target is to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, how do we expect to
measure that?
RR This measurement is by the
Sustainability Division as part of
the Climate Action Plan
No
action
at this
time
A City Bolstered by Downtown and
Complementary Districts - Vehicle Miles
Traveled: Target is to reduce VMT which is
an unattainable and unrealistic goal. We
can't continue to grow outward and reduce
how far we travel.
RR Discuss Metrics discussion –
no action at this time
Page 52:
A City that Prioritizes Accessibility and
Mobility Choices - Transit Accessibility:
Target is to increase % of jobs within a
distance of a route. This is outside our
control, Streamline’s survey response
could be that residents want less routes
and increased frequency and with that
change we have instantly failed.
RR Discuss Metrics discussion –
no action at this time
Under Acres Wholly Surrounded but
Unannexed…why did we use the term
“reduce” as opposed to “decrease” like all
the others?
CC Edit
made
3
Page independent
Metrics. I'd like to see the metrics more
tightly integrated into the document, e.g.
integrated into each vision theme section,
after the "importance" section and before
the goals / objectives / actions (rather than
cordoned off to an appendix-like section at
the back of the plan). If it's not possible to
include current scores with the current
draft then the metrics are too numerous
and too complicated and we need to reduce
and simplify. I'm happy to volunteer some
of my time with Strategic Services to
identify data sources, computation
methodologies, and baseline scores for the
draft metrics.
ME Metrics were the subject of several
months of discussion. Current
arrangement is the direction of the
Board. Some metrics apply to more
than one goal or objective. Could be
rearranged to put metrics
associated with each Theme in
each Theme rather than
consolidated.
The Board is making a
recommendation, the City
Commission sets the final metrics
and text. It is premature to fully
develop the metrics until the
Commission has endorsed them.
Board must consider whether the
delay to assemble baseline values
and targets and have them
accepted is worth delaying the rest
of the plan. Board can reduce the
number of proposed metrics.
Discuss