HomeMy WebLinkAbout5-13-2020 Public Comment - F. Moncrief - warrantless surveillanceFrom:Cyndy Andrus
To:Agenda
Subject:Fwd: Notice and terms regarding warrantless surveillance and other violations
Date:Wednesday, May 13, 2020 4:07:25 PM
Cynthia Andrus|Deputy Mayor
City of BozemanP:406.582.2383|E:candrus@bozeman.net|W: www.bozeman.net
Begin forwarded message:
From: Fern Moncrief <myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com>Date: May 13, 2020 at 3:18:55 PM MDTTo: Cyndy Andrus <CAndrus@BOZEMAN.NET>Subject: Notice and terms regarding warrantless surveillance and otherviolationsReply-To: Fern Moncrief <fern.thehumanxperience@gmail.com>
Re: Notice and terms regarding warrantless surveillance and other violations
Dear Ms. Andrus,
The discussions about “contact tracing” surveillance, and other measuresassociated with the lockdown, have unparalleled importance since what is at stake
is whether Americans will retain unalienable Constitutional rights – or if thoserights will be exchanged for “privileges”.
Various unprecedented “pandemic measures” are being discussed and or
implemented by federal, state and municipal governments. On May 1, the TRACEAct (HR 6666) was introduced, proposing $100 BILLION in 2020 to create a
“contact tracing” mega-industry – a ubiquitous, unconstitutional surveillancenetwork – to continuously surveil without warrant, to enforce “social distancing”
through citizen-policing, to enforce testing and possibly medicating againstconsent, and apparently to grant the “authority” to remove people from their
dwellings (though as written, this last point is as of yet unclear in intent). See:bit.ly/bill6666
Combined with “lockdowns”, which are increasingly seen by Americans as
clearly unfitting measures, this new legislative action is egregious and, for federalofficials, you need to immediately stop this bill. For all officials: stop all anti-
Constitution legislation, and align your actions to preserve all Constitutionalrights and the rule of law in this country.
Will you uphold the US Constitution and support Chief Justice John Marshall’s
decree that any laws in opposition to the Constitution are repugnant, and are null
and void, as per the US Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison decided onFebruary 24, 1803?
Second, is my understanding correct, that the US Constitution is still active and
valid; and that I have the ability to seek legal and lawful remedy for that whichcauses me harm?
I will expect a response in writing (email) with your answer within 10 days. If I
do not hear back from you, or you fail to respond, it will be clear to me that youdo NOT deserve my vote in the next election; and that my understanding, as
stated here, is correct.
There are many fundamental questions emerging about the CV-19 pandemicsituation. Much is coming to light about how mortality models were wrong;
doctors saying they were asked to inaccurately state CV-19 as cause of death;studies reveal gross inaccuracies with PCR testing; whether mask-wearing helps
or harms; and apparent agendas for advancing pharmaceutical/telecom interests,biometrics and the removal of basic freedoms. Many millions of Americans are
becoming aware, and this isn’t a passing thing. See: bit.ly/2AoLEFn
AN UNDERSTANDING, PERTAINING TO MY RIGHTS
A. I have unalienable rights recognized in the original US Constitution that cannotbe superseded by any agenda, nor be removed from me.
B. My unalienable rights are being harmed by agendas implemented by oath-
sworn elected officials, corporate executives and/or non-elected officials(collectively “Agents Of Harm”). These include, without limitation:
i. My free rights to speak, travel, do commerce, work, assemble, and be free ofsurveillance without warrant.
ii. A threat of medical procedures, testing or experimentation without my consent.iii. Threats of punitive detention, violence and or harm for non-compliance.
C. My unalienable rights are NOT conditional – i.e. subject to proving I am not
contagious, nor submitting to surveillance, nor anything that would cause meharm – properly called “extortion”.
NOTICE OF NON CONSENT
Let it be known throughout all jurisdictions and dimensions that:
A. I do not consent to being harmed by any imposition of quarantine, or
restriction on my Constitutional right to assemble, work, travel, speak or docommerce.
B. I do not consent to being told to live in fear, nor made to wear a mask, nor
being mandated an allowable proximity to others, nor being made subject to“contract tracing” surveillance.
C. I do not consent to any offer of forced medical experimentation or testing; nor
forced medical procedure (i.e. vaccine, or substance delivered by air, water, orother means without my knowledge and consent); nor exposure to radiation from
deployments of 4G/5G/wireless infrastructure; nor being tracked by anytechnology or biometric device on or adjacent to my body.
D. I accept your oath of office as your sworn statement which compels you to
uphold the Constitutional against all enemies, foreign and domestic; to protect myrights; and to exhibit a duty of care to respond appropriately when informed of
harm taking place.
E. I reserve all my rights, nunc pro tunc, to pursue legal and lawful remedy for allharm and threats of harm, which may constitute criminal assault and or tort,
caused or contributed by Agents Of Harm. I reserve the right to seek legal andlawful remedy unless and until the stated harmful actions cease and desist.
I sincerely hope that you perceive the gravity of the present situation, and that you
choose to be on the right side of this matter – the side in which Constitutionalrights are defended and we have a chance at life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness.
Thank you for reading this notice, sent to you in good faith, and without ill-intent.
“The law helps the vigilant, before those who sleep on their rights.”
“He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy fromoppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach
to himself.”-Thomas Paine
Sincerely,
Fern Moncrieffern.thehumanxperience@gmail.com
200 Launfal Lane
Bozeman,
MT59718
Constituent