HomeMy WebLinkAbout5-13-2020 Public Comment - D. Jessen - Non consent for warrantless contact tracingFrom:Chris Mehl
To:Agenda
Subject:FW: Non consent for any and all warrantless "contact tracing" and other harm
Date:Wednesday, May 13, 2020 5:39:39 PM
Chris Mehl
Mayor, City of Bozemancmehl@bozeman.net406.581.4992________________________________________From: Dan Jessen [myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com]Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 5:29 PMTo: Chris MehlSubject: Non consent for any and all warrantless "contact tracing" and other harm
Re: Non consent for any and all warrantless "contact tracing" and other harm
Dear Mr. Mehl,
The discussions about “contact tracing” surveillance, and other measures associated with the lockdown, haveunparalleled importance since what is at stake is whether Americans will retain unalienable Constitutional rights –or if those rights will be exchanged for “privileges”.
Various unprecedented “pandemic measures” are being discussed and or implemented by federal, state andmunicipal governments. On May 1, the TRACE Act (HR 6666) was introduced, proposing $100 BILLION in 2020to create a “contact tracing” mega-industry – a ubiquitous, unconstitutional surveillance network – to continuouslysurveil without warrant, to enforce “social distancing” through citizen-policing, to enforce testing and possiblymedicating against consent, and apparently to grant the “authority” to remove people from their dwellings (thoughas written, this last point is as of yet unclear in intent). See: bit.ly/bill6666
Combined with “lockdowns”, which are increasingly seen by Americans as clearly unfitting measures, this newlegislative action is egregious and, for federal officials, you need to immediately stop this bill. For all officials: stopall anti-Constitution legislation, and align your actions to preserve all Constitutional rights and the rule of law in thiscountry.
Will you uphold the US Constitution and support Chief Justice John Marshall’s decree that any laws in opposition tothe Constitution are repugnant, and are null and void, as per the US Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madisondecided on February 24, 1803?
Second, is my understanding correct, that the US Constitution is still active and valid; and that I have the ability toseek legal and lawful remedy for that which causes me harm?
I will expect a response in writing (email) with your answer within 10 days. If I do not hear back from you, or youfail to respond, it will be clear to me that you do NOT deserve my vote in the next election; and that myunderstanding, as stated here, is correct.
There are many fundamental questions emerging about the CV-19 pandemic situation. Much is coming to lightabout how mortality models were wrong; doctors saying they were asked to inaccurately state CV-19 as cause ofdeath; studies reveal gross inaccuracies with PCR testing; whether mask-wearing helps or harms; and apparentagendas for advancing pharmaceutical/telecom interests, biometrics and the removal of basic freedoms. Manymillions of Americans are becoming aware, and this isn’t a passing thing. See: bit.ly/2AoLEFn
AN UNDERSTANDING, PERTAINING TO MY RIGHTS
A. I have unalienable rights recognized in the original US Constitution that cannot be superseded by any agenda, nor
be removed from me.
B. My unalienable rights are being harmed by agendas implemented by oath-sworn elected officials, corporateexecutives and/or non-elected officials (collectively “Agents Of Harm”). These include, without limitation:i. My free rights to speak, travel, do commerce, work, assemble, and be free of surveillance without warrant.ii. A threat of medical procedures, testing or experimentation without my consent.iii. Threats of punitive detention, violence and or harm for non-compliance.
C. My unalienable rights are NOT conditional – i.e. subject to proving I am not contagious, nor submitting tosurveillance, nor anything that would cause me harm – properly called “extortion”.
NOTICE OF NON CONSENT
Let it be known throughout all jurisdictions and dimensions that:
A. I do not consent to being harmed by any imposition of quarantine, or restriction on my Constitutional right toassemble, work, travel, speak or do commerce.
B. I do not consent to being told to live in fear, nor made to wear a mask, nor being mandated an allowableproximity to others, nor being made subject to “contract tracing” surveillance.
C. I do not consent to any offer of forced medical experimentation or testing; nor forced medical procedure (i.e.vaccine, or substance delivered by air, water, or other means without my knowledge and consent); nor exposure toradiation from deployments of 4G/5G/wireless infrastructure; nor being tracked by any technology or biometricdevice on or adjacent to my body.
D. I accept your oath of office as your sworn statement which compels you to uphold the Constitutional against allenemies, foreign and domestic; to protect my rights; and to exhibit a duty of care to respond appropriately wheninformed of harm taking place.
E. I reserve all my rights, nunc pro tunc, to pursue legal and lawful remedy for all harm and threats of harm, whichmay constitute criminal assault and or tort, caused or contributed by Agents Of Harm. I reserve the right to seeklegal and lawful remedy unless and until the stated harmful actions cease and desist.
I sincerely hope that you perceive the gravity of the present situation, and that you choose to be on the right side ofthis matter – the side in which Constitutional rights are defended and we have a chance at life, liberty and the pursuitof happiness.
Thank you for reading this notice, sent to you in good faith, and without ill-intent.
“The law helps the vigilant, before those who sleep on their rights.”
“He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates thisduty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”-Thomas Paine
Sincerely,Dan Jessendjvoice1@aol.com4225 Cascade Street Bozeman, MT 59718 Constituent