HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Commission Meeting 5.18.2020 Resolution 5174 Amendment of Street Reconstruction Funding PolicyPage 1 of 5
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Shawn Kohtz, City Engineer
Mitch Reister, Public Works Director
Anna Rosenberry, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 5174 - ESTABLISHING GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE FUNDING OF STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INCLUDING ESTABLISHING A FIXED PERCENTAGE OF FUNDING FOR STREET
RECONSTRUCTION AND A MAXIMUM LINEAL FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT TO BE PAID FOR BY THE CREATION OF A SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BASED ON STREET
CLASSIFICATION.
MEETING DATE: May 18, 2020
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 5174. This Resolution amends existing Resolution 4507 (underline/strikeout indicated in resolution text)
STRATEGIC PLAN: Section 4 of the City’s Strategic Plan calls for a Well Planned City
stating, “4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for
existing and new infrastructure.”
BACKGROUND: Resolution 4507 established policy for the funding of local street
reconstruction projects and was adopted in 2014. The Resolution is attached for reference.
Resolution 4507 requires a portion of the cost of local street reconstruction projects to be allocated
to adjacent property owners through a special improvement district (SID) and the remainder to be
allocated to the City Street and Curb Reconstruction Fund per Table 1. The amendment contained
in Resolution No. 5174 is to include a not-to-exceed special improvement district assessment, with
an annual inflation factor similar to the one used in our impact fee program. Costs above the not-
to-exceed assessment will be covered by the Street Reconstruction Fund.
120
Page 2 of 5
Table 1. Local Street Reconstruction Cost Share
Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) Funding Split (SID/Reconstruction Fund)
Less than 800 75%/25%
800-1500 50%/50%
1501-4500 15%/85%
More than 4500 100%
This amendment is being proposed in response to the large number of Special Improvement
Districts that have been protested and not created, leading to the street reconstruction project being
abandoned and the streets not improved. If 50 percent of adjacent property owners protest the
improvement district, the street reconstruction project is cancelled, and City staff begin work on
the next project on the list. Table 2 provides a history of projects; since the program was
established, five districts have been successfully created and street reconstructions completed and
six districts have failed.
Table 2. History of Local Street Reconstruction Projects Since Adoption of Resolution 4507
Special improvement districts that have passed the protest and allowed the street reconstruction
project to advance to construction are indicated in green in Table 2. All of the successful projects
Project Location Calendar Year SID Passed Project Cost Ave. Cost / Property SID Funding
E. Story Street 2015 Yes 610,000.00$ 9,531.25$ 50%
N. Wallace Avenue 2016 Yes 2,141,000.00$ 3,751.21$ 15%
N. Grand Avenue 2016 No 1,310,230.00$ 15,849.56$ 75%
W. Olive Street 2017 No 1,910,210.00$ 4,035.65$ 15%
E. Olive Street 2017 Yes 933,000.00$ 3,673.51$ 15%
S. Grand Avenue 2018 No 2,330,212.00$ 18,592.12$ 75%
S. Tracy Avenue 2018 Yes 1,600,000.00$ 3,157.70$ 15%
N. 17th Avenue 2019 No 1,012,000.00$ 13,924.71$ 50%
N. Tracy Avenue 2019 Yes 511,000.00$ 9,441.17$ 50%
W. Koch Street 2020 No 1,470,000.00$ 16,857.00$ 75%
S. 5th Avenue 2020 No 2,329,000.00$ 19,408.33$ 75%
W Harrison Street 2021 1,436,474.00$ 75%
S. 6th Avenue 2022 2,328,908.00$ 75%
S. 3rd Avenue 2023 2,052,724.00$ 75%
S. 4th Avenue 2024 1,801,763.00$ 75%
E. Davis Street 2025 701,090.00$ 75%
*The remainder of the list are previously failed streets
121
Page 3 of 5
that were constructed had a 50% cost share or less to the property owners with assessments ranging
from $3,200 to $9,500, financed over 20 years. All projects with a 75% cost split to the property
owners have failed to pass an SID protest with costs ranging from $15,900 to $19,400 per average
property. Property owners have voiced substantial frustration to City staff with the higher cost
split percentages (50% and higher), and all remaining projects on the local street reconstruction
project list are estimated to have a 75% cost split to the property owners. The highest SID cost
allocated to property owners that has passed the protest is $138 per foot of lot frontage.
Although dispite difficulties , the current policy has resulted in five successful projects. City staff have designed and provided construction management services for local street reconstruction projects resulting in savings relative to using consultant design services; however, as Table 2 indicates, our upcoming street reconstruction projects do not have funding splits that we believe
will successfully pass SID protests without some revision to our current policies.
For example, City staff recently completed preliminary design of two local street reconstruction
projects (W. Koch Street and S. 5th Avenue). Upon completion of preliminary design, staff held
public meetings with the property owners adjacent to these streets. Staff described the
improvements, costs, and policy outlined in Resolution 4507 to the property owners. Both projects
were based on a 75% cost split ($16,800-$19,400 financed over 20 years) to the property owners.
The property owners were polled to gauge their interest in these projects. Upon taking a vote, both
street reconstruction projects had an overwhelming fail vote. Subsequently, both projects were
cancelled and placed on the bottom of the local street reconstruction projects list.
The estimated cost of the survey work, preliminary engineering, public notification, public
meeting, and initial property owner vote to make a decision on an SID is: o $20,000 - $30,000 Topographic Survey
o $50,000 preliminary design and mailers
Given the time associated with these design elements, two project votes can be presented to property owners in one year. After two unsuccessful SID protests within one fiscal year, there is
not enough time to attempt a third vote, complete final design work, and meet the construction timeframe to complete a local street reconstruction project in that fiscal year. Additionally, each
time that an SID vote fails, the survey and preliminary design work associated with these projects remains viable for up to two years. After two years, a new survey must be obtained and preliminary design work amended to accommodate new survey information.
Lastly, the local streets that remain to be reconstructed, listed in Table 2, are in poor condition and require a relatively large maintenance investment in Streets Division time and materials to keep these streets passable until they can be reconstructed.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS BY STAFF Suggested Alternative
122
Page 4 of 5
We recommend setting a not-to-exceed assessment of $138 per foot of lot frontage (lineal footage), with that amount increasing each year by the same Construction Cost inflation factor
that is used in our Impact Fee program. The remaining cost of a street reconstruction project
covered by the City Street and Curb Reconstruction Fund. This represents the highest cost that
has successfully passed a local street SID protest to date. The current level of annual funding can be maintained with this policy by skipping a year as
necessary between projects to allow the fund to accumulate enough cash to complete the next project. This policy amendment acknowledges the commitment of prior property owners that have approved an SID and places future SID assessments in line with existing SID assessments.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: Leave the policy as-is or amend the policy.
ALTERNATIVES: If the policy continues without amendment, we anticipate that all local
street SIDs will be protested out for remaining listed projects due to the 75% cost allocation to
the adjacent property owners. Other options to consider could include:
• A predetermined flat-fee, equal assessment method or a predetermined cost/foot
of frontage. This method would not have any relation to the size of property owned. But, this would allow staff to meet with the neighborhood property owners and take an initial SID protest vote without completing a topographic
survey, preliminary design work, and cost estimate. As a rough estimate, a local street costs $360/foot to reconstruct. If a flat fee of $9,000/property or $130/foot of frontage were applied, this would be significantly less than the full cost of the project and therefore, encourage property owners to approve the associated
SID. The percentage cost split would always be different but the fixed assessment amount would remain the same. This could provide additional clarity to property
owners, because they would know their actual assessment with certainty well in advance of the project.
• Another option would be to eliminate the local cost split and cover the full project cost from the Street Reconstruction Fund. This would require an increase in the City-Wide Street Maintenance Assessment. Other local streets receive regular
maintenance using less costly street treatments such as chip seal or mill-and-overlay methods that are entirely covered by the Street Maintenance Fund. The difference between the Streets listed in Table 2 and other local street maintenance
is that the streets in Table 2 have deteriorated to the point that less costly
treatments are not viable due to the level of deterioration.
FISCAL EFFECTS: If the Resolution is adopted, the change to the policy will alter the cost
split between the Street Reconstruction Fund and property owners. Staff estimates that roughly
38% of the cost of future street reconstruction projects would be borne by property owners with
the remaining 62% covered by the City Street Reconstruction Fund.
123
Page 5 of 5
Attachments: Resolution No. 5174
Resolution 4507
Street and Curb Reconstruction Fund Capital Improvements Plan
124
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5174
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,
MONTANA, ESTABLISHING GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE FUNDING OF
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INCLUDING ESTABLISHING A FIXED
PERCENTAGE OF FUNDING FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND A MAXIMUM
LINEAL FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT TO BE PAID FOR BY THE CREATION OF A
SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BASED ON STREET CLASSIFICATION.
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to addressing the community's expressed needs
and desires for services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to meeting those desires and demands for services
in a fiscally responsible manner; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to meeting those desires and demands for services
in a manner which recognizes the fiscal and legal interests of all of the system users now and in
the future and not a limited subset of users; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has developed and adopted a long range transportation facility
plan which examined current and future needs and provides a lawful, logical, balanced,
operationally sound, and cost effective basis upon which to maintain and develop the City' s
transportation system; and
WHEREAS, There is a need to allocate funding for the reconstruction of streets in the City; and
WHEREAS, There is a need to establish a maximum per-lineal-foot charge for reconstruction cost
that may be assessed to an individual property and paid for through the creation of Special
Improvement Districts, and
125
WHEREAS, The City Commission wishes to allocate the costs of street reconstruction
equitably among all of the users of the network;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of
Bozeman, Montana, that
Section 1
GOALS
The following goals are hereby established for the consideration of the financing of street
reconstruction projects in the City of Bozeman:
It shall be a goal of the City of Bozeman to invest street reconstruction funds efficiently
and equitably by:
A. Providing an equitable basis for street reconstruction funding by defining the city's
transportation network functional classifications;
B. Establishing Street funding categories and allotments for the purpose of determining
both the local share and the community share of street reconstruction project costs. Insofar as
possible, these categories will be congruent with the city' s transportation network functional
classifications;
C. Average Daily Traffic volumes used for the street reconstruction program in no way
reduces the expected and planned capacities described in the long range transportation plan.
D. Establishing a maximum amount assessed (on a per-lineal-footage basis) to an
individual property and paid for through the creation of Special Improvement Districts. If a street
reconstruction project should be assessed based on an assessment methodology that is not lineal
footage, a maximum shall be established by the Commission in the Intention to Create the Special
Improvement District.
SECTION 2
POLICIES
The following policies are hereby established for street reconstruction project financing
in the City of Bozeman.
126
1. The following street funding categories and allocations are hereby established for
the city's transportation network:
Street Classification Average Daily Traffic
(vehicles per day)
Split (SID or Other
Source/Street Reconstruction
Fund)
Local Up to 800 75% SID or Other
Source/25% Street
Reconstruction
Minor Collector 800-1500 50% SID or Other
Source/50% Street
Reconstruction
Major Collector 1500-4500 15% SID or Other
Source/85% Street
Reconstruction
Arterial Over 4500 100% Street Reconstruction
2. The local share of a street reconstruction project shall be paid for using funds
other than the City' s Street Reconstruction Fund, the City's Urban Fund Allocation or any
other general obligation fund. The City' s preferred method of generating the local share
funds is a Special Improvement District (SID) or other, if applicable, a Payback District.
3. When recent traffic counts for a street eligible for reconstruction. are unavailable,
the City Engineering Division will perform counts to establish the Average Daily Traffic.
4, Street Reconstruction projects to be undertaken will be prioritized using
combination of the City' s Street Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and traffic volumes,
5. Both the project to be undertaken and the financing allotments to be used will be
reviewed and approved by the City Commission at the time of the adoption of the Street
Capital Improvement Plan.
6. The City Commission has the discretion to establish the funding allotments to be
used in street reconstruction projects in the best interest of the community.
7. There is a maximum amount of $138 per-lineal-foot assessed to an individual property
and paid for through the creation of a Special Improvement District. This amount shall be
increased by an annual inflation amount based on the value of the Construction Cost Index
published in the first December edition of the current year.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman,
Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 18th day of May, 2020.
127
___________________________________
CHRIS MEHL
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
TANYA ANDREASON
Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
GREG SULLIVAN
City Attorney
128
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4507
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,
MONTANA, ESTABLISHING GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE FUNDING OF
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INCLUDING ESTABLISHING A FIXED
PERCENTAGE OF FUNDING FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION TO BE PAID FOR
BY THE CREATION OF A SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BASED ON
STREET CLASSIFICATION.
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to addressing the community's
expressed needs and desires for services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to meeting those desires and demands
for services in a fiscally responsible manner; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to meeting,those desires and demands
for services in a manner which recognizes the fiscal and legal interests of all of the system users
now and in the future and not a limited subset of users; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has developed and adopted a long range
transportation facility plan which examined current and future needs and provides a lawful,
logical, balanced, operationally sound, and cost effective basis upon which to maintain and
develop the City's transportation system; and
WHEREAS, There is a need to allocate funding for the reconstruction of streets in the
City; and
WHEREAS, The City Commission wishes to allocate the costs of street reconstruction
equitably among all of the users of the network;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of
Bozeman, Montana to wit
Pagel of 3
129
Resolution 4507, Funding ofStreet Reconstruction Projects
SECTION I
GOALS
The following goals are hereby established for the consideration of the financing of street
reconstruction projects in the City of Bozeman:
1.It shall be a goal of the City of Bozeman to invest street reconstruction funds efficiently
and equitably by:
A. Providing an equitable basis for street reconstruction funding by defining the city's
transportation network functional classifications;
B. Establishing Street funding categories and allotments for the purpose of determining
both the local share and the community share of street reconstruction project costs. Insofar as
possible, these categories will be congruent with the city's transportation network functional
classifications;
C. Average Daily Traffic volumes used for the street reconstruction program in no way
reduces the expected and planned capacities described in the long range transportation plan.
SECTION 2
POLICIES
The following policies are hereby established for street reconstruction project financing
in the City of Bozeman.
I.The following street funding categories and allocations are hereby established for
the city's transportation network:
Street huiding Classification Average Daily Trafl]c I'Midhig Split(SID or Other
vehicles
RecoiiStITICti011 fttild)
per day)
Local Up to 800 75%/25%
Minor collectol. 800 - 1500 50%150%
Major Collector 1500 - 4500 15%/ 85%
Arterial Over-4500 100%
Page 2 of 3
130
Resolution 4507, Funding of Street Reconstruction Projects
2. The local share of a street reconstruction project shall be paid for using funds
other than the City's Street Reconstruction Fund, the City's Urban Fund Allocation or any
other general obligation fund. The City's preferred method of generating the local share
funds is a Special Improvement District (SID) or other, if applicable, a Payback District.
3.When recent traffic counts for a street eligible for reconstruction.are unavailable,
the City Engineering Division will perform counts to establish the Average Daily Traffic.
4,Street Reconstruction projects to be undertaken will be prioritized using
combination of the City's Street Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and traffic volumes,
5.Both the project to be undertaken and the financing allotments to be used will be
reviewed and approved by the City Commission at the time of the adoption of the Street
Capital Improvement Plan.
6.The City Commission has the discretion to establish the funding allotments to be
used in street reconstruction projects in the best interest of the community.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana,
at a regular session thereof held on the 3rd day of February, 2014.
Ga-e
4,1 JEF7FY6- Kit A USS
ti May
ATTEST
Cit Clerk
APPROVED AS TO/PFRM:
G TVAN
C, ttomey
Page 3 of 3
131
STREET & CURB RECONSTRUCTION FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial SummaryCurrent YearFY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25UnscheduledProjected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP2,146,605$ 1,762,338$ 1,723,436$ 2,042,724$ 2,153,671$ 2,348,728$ Plus: Street Maintenance Assessments Dedicated 709,733$ 723,928$ 738,406$ 753,174$ 768,238$ 783,603$ Plus: SID for N Tracy ‐ SCR16 ‐ 50%506,000$ Plus: SID for S 5th (Olive to Hayes) ‐75%2,108,490$ Plus: SID for W Harrison (Tracy to 6th) ‐ 75%1,077,356$ Plus: SID for S 6th (Babcock to Cleveland) ‐ 75%1,746,681$ Plus: SID for S 3rd (Olive to Cleveland) ‐75%1,539,543 Plus: SID for S 4th (College to Babcock) ‐75%1,351,322 Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs(1,600,000)$ (2,871,320)$ (1,496,474)$ (2,388,908)$ (2,112,724)$ (1,861,763)$ (10,104,000)$ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP1,762,338$ 1,723,436$ 2,042,724$ 2,153,671$ 2,348,728$ 2,621,890$ Assumptions Made for Revenue EstimatesCurrent YearFY20FY21FY22FY23 FY24 FY25Total Estimated Annual Street Assessment Revenue709,733$ 709,733$ 723,928$ 738,406$ 753,174$ 768,238$ Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Attributed to Annexations0.0%2%2%2%2%2%Total Estimated Revenues709,733$ 723,928$ 738,406$ 753,174$ 768,238$ 783,603$ Current Revenues Dedicated to Street & Curb CIP %100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Reconstruction & Curbs0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP709,733$ 723,928$ 738,406$ 753,174$ 768,238$ 783,603$ ProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(2,871,320)$(1,496,474)$(2,388,908)$(2,112,724)$(1,861,763)$(10,104,000)FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULEDSTREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 208132
STREET & CURB RECONSTRUCTION FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project NameFY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 UnscheduledSCR01 ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 ‐ SCR13 S 6TH (BABCOCK TO CLEVELAND)‐DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION‐ ‐ 2,328,908 ‐ ‐ ‐ SCR14 S 5TH (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 2,811,320 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SCR15 W HARRISON (TRACY TO 6TH)‐DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ‐ 1,436,474 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SCR23UNSCHEDULED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10,104,000 SCR24S 3RD (OLIVE TO CLEVELAND) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION‐ ‐ ‐ 2,052,724 ‐ ‐ SCR25S 4TH (COLLEGE TO BABCOCK) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION‐ ‐ ‐ 1,801,763 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,871,320 1,496,474 2,388,908 2,112,724 1,861,763 10,104,000 209133
STREET & CURB RECONSTRUCTION FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This plan outlines the use of Street Maintenance District dollars that are dedicated to the reconstruction of streets and curbs. The policy for required matches with Special Improvement Districts (SID’s) is outlined in Commission Resolution No. 4507. Each project is dependent upon the creation of a Special Improvement District to pay for a share of the project costs. If preliminary information indicates that property owners along the street are likely to have sufficient protests to prevent creation of the SID, we recommend moving to the next project on the list. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The roads are proposed each year and depending on the preliminary information staff will move forward or move on to the next project on the list. 210134
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 60,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER ‐ TO GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS:‐ COST OF MATERIALS‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 2021SCR01 (FY21) 211135
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER ‐ TO GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS:‐ COST OF MATERIALS‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 202260,000 SCR01 (FY22)212136
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER ‐ TO GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN ‐ CURBS CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECT ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS:‐ COST OF MATERIALS‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 202360,000 SCR01 (FY23)213137
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER TO‐ GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ COST OF MATERIALS ‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 202460,000 SCR01 (FY24)214138
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER TO‐ GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ COST OF MATERIALS ‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 202560,000 SCR01 (FY25)215139
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #S 6TH (BABCOCK TO CLEVELAND)‐DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2,328,908 DESCRIPTION:‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH 6TH AVENUE FROM BABCOCK TO‐ CLEVELAND, INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS & ‐ GUTTERS. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING ‐ CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, ‐ EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO ‐ A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND ‐ KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE‐ A CITY STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES SOUTH 6TH TO FUNCTION AS A LOCAL‐ STREET, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A 75% CONTRIBUTION ‐ FROM PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT ‐ DISTRICT ASSESSMENT.‐ S 6TH (BABCOCK TO CLEVELAND)‐DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 20232,328,908 SCR13 216140
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #S 5TH (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 2,811,320 DESCRIPTION:‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH 5TH AVE FROM OLIVE TO ‐ HAYES, INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND ‐ GUTTERS. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING ‐ CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, ‐ EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO ‐ A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND ‐ KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE‐ A CITY STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES SOUTH 5TH TO FUNCTION AS A MINOR‐ COLLECTOR, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A 50% CONTRIBUTION ‐ FROM PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL DISTRICT ‐ ASSESSMENT.‐ S 5TH (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 20212,811,320 SCR14 217141
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #W HARRISON (TRACY TO 6TH)‐DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 1,436,474 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF WEST HARRISON FROM TRACY TO 6TH, ‐ INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND GUTTERS. THE ‐ STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING CONDITION AND ‐ CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE ‐ STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO THE POINT WHERE ‐ IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO ‐ PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A CITY ‐ STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER ‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES WEST HARRISON TO FUNCTION AS A ‐ LOCAL STREET, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A 75% ‐ CONTRIBUTION FROM PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT. ‐ UNSCHEDULED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ‐ 10,104,000 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION: ‐ DAVIS (CHURCH TO PLUM) ‐ $702,000 ‐ N GRAND (MENDENHALL TO PEACH) ‐ $1,311,000 ‐ W OLIVE (8TH TO TRACY) ‐ $1,911,000 ‐ S GRAND (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ $2,331,000 ‐ W LINCOLN (GRAND TO WILLSON) ‐ $247,000 ‐ S BLACK (COLLEGE TO CUL‐DE‐SAC) ‐ $753,000 ‐ N 17TH (DURSTON TO END) ‐ $1,114,000 ‐ W KOCH (8TH TO TRACY) ‐ 1,735,000 ‐ UNSCHEDULED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS UNSCHEDULED10,104,000 SCR23W HARRISON (TRACY TO 6TH)‐DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 20221,436,474 SCR15 218142
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #S 3RD (OLIVE TO CLEVELAND) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2,052,724 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF S 3RD AVE FROM OLIVE TO ‐ CLEVELAND, INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND ‐ GUTTERS. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING ‐ CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, ‐ EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO ‐ A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND ‐ KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE ‐ A CITY STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER ‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. ‐ S 3RD (OLIVE TO CLEVELAND) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 20242,052,724 SCR24 219143
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #S 4TH (COLLEGE TO BABCOCK) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION1,801,763 DESCRIPTION:‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF S 4TH FROM COLLEGE TO BABCOCK, ‐ INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND GUTTERS. ‐ THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING CONDITION AND ‐ CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE ‐ STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO A POINT WHERE ‐ IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO ‐ PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A CITY ‐ STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES SOUTH 5TH TO FUNCTION AS A LOCAL‐ STREET WHICH REQUIRES A 75% CONTRIBUTION FROM ‐ PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL DISTRICT ‐ ASSESSMENT.‐ S 4TH (COLLEGE TO BABCOCK) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 20251,801,763 SCR25 220144