Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKNC Public Comment Packet 20-01-30Growth Policy Comments (City) Planning Board Tuesday, January 21, 2020 1 Request #1, Option #1: Request that the properties outlined in orange above remain designated as the Industrial Plan Category as they are described in the current Growth Policy Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Justification: A recent request to reclassify the area outlined in green in the above figure as Commercial Emphasis Mixed Use, submitted on January 6, 2020 and approved by motion by the Planning Board on January 14, 2020, could effectively create significant “non-conforming” situations for the properties outlined in orange. Moreover, the inclusion of the NEHMU Zoning District in the Zoning Correlation Table for Commercial Emphasis Mixed Use Plan Category areas would not permit uses that already exist on these sites (i.e. Manufacturing, Heavy). INTRODUCTION Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the Northeast Neighborhood with you all. This district of Bozeman is a diverse  and  textured  urban  area  where  the  story  of Bozeman’s past, present, and future intersect. It is the location of some of Bozeman’s most historic structures and sites, and is home to a community of passionate residents  intent  on  seeing  the  neighborhood  fulfill  its creative  potential.  The  forces  of  expansion  and development  are  currently being  felt  throughout Bozeman,  and  the  Northeast  Neighborhood  is  no exception.  Property  values  are  climbing  steeply  while opportunities for residents to both live and work in the city are shrinking, as change is coming to the Northeast Neighborhood. Managed properly and responsibly, this change can enhance and enrich the lives of Northeast residents, artists, and business owners. To  better  align  the  Growth  Policy  classification  in Bozeman’s  Northeast  Neighborhood,  we  recommend replacing the ‘Industrial’ future land use designation with the ‘Community Commercial Mixed Use’ designation. We have  included  two  future  land  use  maps  for consideration, (see Figures 1.1A & 1.2B). Figures 1.1A/ 1.2B: PROPOSED MAP ADDITION