The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-13-2020 Public Comment - M. Alverson - State of MT Landlord Regulatory RestrictionsTO: FROM: DATE RE: FACTS: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 435 Ryman• Missoula MT 59802 (406) 552-6020 • Fax: (406) 327-2105 attorney@ci.missoula.mt.us Legal Opinion 2019-004 Mayor John Engen, City Council, Dale Bickell, Eran Pehan, Ellen Buchanan, Chris Behan, Mike Haynes, Denise Alexander, Mary Mccrea, Ginny Merriam, Leigh Griffing, Steve Johnson, Marty Rehbein, Kirsten Hands, Department MRA, Department City Attorney Jim Nugent, City Attorney February 26, 2019 Montana local governments prohibited from exercising any power applying to or affecting licensing of landlords or regulating landlord activities with regard to tenants beyond what Montana's Residential Landlord Tenant Act provides for. Recently there have been inquiries about the Missoula City Council's ability to attempt to adopt ordinances pertaining to landlords with respect to residential rental relationships. ISSUE: Does a Montana local government have power to regulate landlord licensing or relationship activities between landlords and tenants? CONCLUSION: No. Montana state local government law prohibits Montana local governments from exercising any power that attempts to license landlords or regulate landlord activities with regard to tenants beyond what is provided in The Montana's Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. LEGAL DISCUSSION: Montana state law sets forth "The Montana Residential Landlord and Tenant Act of 1977" in sections 70-24-101 through 70-24-442 MCA. This law is approximately sixteen ( 16) pages long as codified in the Montana Code Annotated. Montana state law in title 70, chapter 25 MCA entitled "RESIDENTIAL TENANTS SECURITY DEPOSITS" sets forth in sections 70-25-101 through 70-25-205 MCA state laws pertaining to residential tenant's security deposits. Montana Code Annotated title 7 is entitled "LOCAL GOVERNMENT". Chapter 1 sets forth general provisions of Montana state law pertaining to Montana local governments. Part 1 of chapter 1 is entitled "NATURE OF SELF-GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS" Section 7-1-111 MCA is entitled "POWERS DENIED". Subsection 7-1-111(13) MCA enacted in 2001 pe1iains to residential landlords and states: "POWERS DENIED. A local government unit with self-government powers IS PROHIBITED FROM EXERCISING THE FOLLOWING: ... . (13) ANY POWER THAT APPLIES TO OR AFFECTS LANDLORDS, as defined in 70-24-103, WHEN THAT POWER IS INTENDED TO LICENSE LANDLORDS OR TO REGULATE THEIR ACTIVITIES WITH RESPECT TO TENANTS BEYOND WHAT IS PROVIDED IN Title 70, chapters 24 and 25. This subsection is not intended to restrict a local government's ability to require landlords to comply with ordinances or provisions that are applicable to all other businesses or residences within the local government's jurisdiction." ( emphasis added) The general composition of title 70, chapters 24 and 25 MCA that are cross referenced to within this subsection are identified in the first paragraph of this legal opinion. The section 70-24-103 MCA definition of "landlords" that is cross referenced to is set forth in subsection 70-24-103(7) MCA and states:. CONCLUSION: "(7) 'Landlord" means (a) the owner, lessor, or sublessor of the dwelling unit or the building of which it is a part; or (b) a manager of the premises who fails to disclose the managerial position". No. Montana state local government law prohibits Montana local governments from exercising any power that attempts to license landlords or regulate landlord activities with regard to tenants beyond what is provided in The Montana's Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Isl Jim Nugent Jim Nugent, City Attorney JN:jb -2- Actual Legislative Intent of MONTANA RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT OF 1977 The act was passed in 1977 to make sure that tenants have protections against unscrupulous landlords and that landlords have a clear process for dealing with problem tenants.Apr 11, 2004 From the committee minutes and history of the law. 7-1-111 (13) any power that applies to or affects landlords, as defined in 70-24-103, when that power is intended to license landlords or to regulate their activities with regard to tenants beyond what is provided in Title 70, chapters 24 and 25. This subsection is not intended to restrict a local government's ability to require landlords to comply with ordinances or provisions that are applicable to all other businesses or residences within the local government's jurisdiction. IN TITLE 70 THERE IS NO MENTION THAT LANDLORDS ARE SPECILIZED OR SOLELY RESPONSIBILE FOR LOCAL RENTAL RATES WITH THE LOCAL OGVENMENT EXCLUSIONS HOWEVER BOTH CITIES AND CITIZENS HAVE TO ASK THE LANDLORDS/PROPERTY MANAGERS FOR A SEAT AT THE TABLE AND CAN LEGALLY COLLUDE TO CHANGE AND MANIPULATE MARKET RATES CAN CHARGE DIFFERENT RATES FORDIFFERENT TIMES OF SEASONS AND CAN EXCLUSIVELY CONTROL RENTALS LIKE A STATE ORDAINED MONOPOLY Who can ask for an Attorney General's opinion as to the legislative intent - which I have found from Legislative records of MONTANA RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT OF 1977 So if that is the intent then the powers denied local government in 7-1-111 as they perrtain to rental rates does not need to exist and should be struck REMEMBER-A COURT CANNOT BE MOVED BY THE WEATHER OF THE DAY BUT BY THE CLIMATE OF THE ERA The law was passed in 77 43 years ago when economies and population were so much different. As it stand now this law 7-1-111 pertaining to Landlords givens them a state ordained monopoly and is truly hurting everyone but them. If you want the State to take this over then by all means DO NOTHING and remember they will take the taxes too - First rule of government Government Feeds itself FIRST! No Local government share or even a shot of the 6% of their own Rental Vehicle Tax So here is who can ask for an Attorney Generals's Opinion: The EXACT WORDING TO REQUEST A G's Opinion: MCA 2- 15 (7) to give an opinion in writing, without fee, to the legislature or either house of the legislature, to any state officer, board, or commission, to any county attorney, to the city attorney of any city or town, or to the board of county commissioners of any county of the state when required upon any question of law relating to their respective offices. The attorney general shall give the opinion within 3 months following the date that it is requested unless the attorney general certifies in writing to the requesting party that the question is of sufficient complexity to require additional time. If an opinion issued by the attorney general conflicts with an opinion issued by a city attorney, county attorney, or an attorney employed or retained by any state officer, board, commission, or department, the attorney general's opinion is controlling unless overruled by a state district court or the supreme court. And from the A G's website: Standing: The requestor must have standing for an opinion-that is, the request must be submitted and signed by one of the following: an elected state official; the leadership of the Montana House or Senate; a department head, chairperson of or chief counsel for a state office, board, or commission; a city attorney, town attorney, or county attorney; or the chairperson of or attorney for a board of county commissioners, 2-15-501 (7) of the Montana Code Annotated. The request must involve a question oflaw relating to the requestor's office, MCA 2-15-501(7). Because it does not say "current" member it, does not mean I cannot request it and be successful. But I do believe that as the Commission of Bozeman YOU SHOULD to SHOW YOU CARE about HOW PEOPLE RE SUFFERING The Question is simple in MCA 7-1-111 as it pertains to landlords since the ileigislative inent was not to regulate rents and its unintended consequence is that now you have a state ordained monopoly shouldn't it be struck from 7-1-111 so the governments closest to the people suffering be allowed to regulate accordingly, after in Bozeman municpal codes thewords, "Quality of Life of our Residents," appears 146 times. Your residents are hurting you can help now you ak or I will but it's coming. FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Average High Low JUL 0.283 0.458 0.536 0.246 0.597 0.808 JUL 9.22% 12.24% 5.12% AUG 0.824 0.846 0.947 1.007 1.113 1.287 AUG 20.59% 21 .61% 19.55% Rental Car Tax Cumulative End-of-Mo nth Collections $ million SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR 0.831 1.612 2.532 2.534 2.9 18 3.180 3.178 0.848 1.812 2.835 2.843 3.274 3.548 3.550 0.957 1.848 2.812 2.816 3.069 3.549 3.553 1.008 1.995 3.116 3.124 3.696 3.881 3.882 1.125 2. 190 3.661 3.688 4.341 4.576 4.576 1.313 2.439 3.958 Five Year Average Collection Pattern (FY2015 - FY2019) Percent of FYE Revenue Collected b End of Month SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR 20.73% 41 .11 % 65.02% 65.23% 75.19% 81 .44% 81.46% 21 .86% 42.61% 66.67% 66.86% 77 .00% 83.44% 83.49% 19.76% 38.47% 64 .20% 64 .29% 70.05% 80.39% 80.39% APR MAY JUN 3.682 3.859 3.86'3 4.009 4.249 ~.253 3.855 4.374 4.37o 4.470 4.798 < 815 5.479 5.675 5.687 APR MAY JUN 93.44% 99.79% 99.98% 96.26% 99.94% 100.06°/, 88.01% 99.70% 99.91 % HJ2 Forecast Allocated to Months Using Average Collection Pattern Percentage, FY2020 Actual Collections and Strai ht Line Extra o lation from Year-to-Date Collections HJ2 Forecast ~-.1scc-. ---\ -\-{-~er ----ZOM -----0.--lov ---2C\---C\~-) O<-\ -,~· ---------- -- FY20i5 FY2016 FY2017 FY20i8 FY20 19 FY2020 Average High Low JUL 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.458 0.364 JUL 14.83% 26.35% 0.00% JUL Medical Marijuana Sales Tax Cumulative End-of-Month Collections $ million AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.391 0.400 0.405 0.798 0.840 0.859 1.296 0.542 0.565 0.850 0.873 0.916 1.181 1.266 1.290 1.624 0.392 0.438 0.846 0.955 Average Colleciton Pattern Assuming Proportional Revenue Collection Percent of FYE Revenue Collected b End of Month AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 17.56% 18.32% 40.26% 41.25% 42.83% "64 .17% 68.28% 69.67% 94 .68% 31 .19% 32.53% 48.97% 50.24% 52.76% 68.02% 72.88% 74 .28% 96.18% 0.00% 0.00% 29.03% 29.66% 30.04% 59.20% 62.35% 63.73% 93.52% Fi sca l Note Forecast Allocated to Months Using Average Collection Pattern Percentage, FY2020 Actual Collections and Strai ht Line Extra olation from Year-to-Date Collections AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN FYE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.332 1.347 1.347 1.671 1.701 1.737 MAY JUN FYE 97 .39% 98.83% 100.00% 98.88% 100.00% 100.00% 96.23% 97.92% 100.00% MAY JUN FYE Fiscal Note Forecai .. 0.386 0.458 0.477 1.049 1.075 1. 11 6 1.671 1.779 1.815 2.466 2.537 2.574 2.605 Actual Collections 0.364 0.392 0.438 0.846 0.955 % of Fiscal Nole 13.96% 15.03% 16.83% 32.47% 36.68% Extrapolation FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Average High Low HJ2 Forecast JUL 1.795 2.266 2.274 1.784 2.244 3.441 JUL 9.25% 10.53% 7.58% JUL 2.441 Actual Collections 3.441 % of HJ2 13. 04% Extrapolation JUL FY2015 1.795 FY2016 2.266 FY2017 2.274 FY2018 1.784 FY2019 2.244 FY2020 3.441 30 --l<- FY2015 25 --FY2016 --FY2017 20 - - FY2018 VI ~ C 15 E "' 10 5 0 Accommodations Sales Tax Cumulative End-of-Month Collections $ million AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 4.614 4.731 8.890 12.640 12.956 14.368 15.932 16.049 17.321 4.774 4.965 10.009 14.707 14.929 16.126 18.008 18.099 19.193 5.196 5.412 10.238 14.639 14.894 16.467 18.040 18.268 19.485 5.663 5.831 10.678 15.647 16.009 17.462 19.467 19.536 20.753 5.957 6.230 11 .212 16.492 16.753 18.809 20.805 21.036 23.589 6.711 6.905 13.154 18.308 Five Year Average Collection Pattern (FY2015 - FY2019) Percent of FYE Revenue Collected b End of Month AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 23.40% 24.26% 45.56% 66.19% 67.45% 74.32% 82.38% 83.03% 89.60% 24.07% 24.79% 46.83% 68.36% 69.40% 75.32% 83.71% 84.1 3% 91.49% FY2014 FY2015 · FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Average High Low HJ2 Forecast Actual Collections % of HJ2 Extrapolation FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 6 JUL 0.328 0.283 0.458 0.536 0.246 0.597 JUL 8.91% 12.24% 5.12% Rental Car Tax Cumulative End-of-Month Collections $ million AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 0.678 0.680 1.769 2.119 2.219 2.474 2.859 2.865 3.151 0.824 0.831 1.612 2.532 2.534 2.918 3.180 3.178 3.682 0.846 0.848 1.812 2.835 2.843 3.274 3.548 3.550 4.009 0.947 0.957 1.848 2.812 2.816 3.069 3.549 3.553 3.855 1.007 1.008 1.995 3.116 3.124 3.696 3.881 3.882 4.470 1.113 1.125 2.190 3.661 3.688 4.341 4.576 4.576 5.479 Five Year Average Collection Pattern (FY2014 - FY2018) Percent of FYE Revenue Collected b End of Month AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 20.69% 20.80% 43.47% 64.52% 65.10% 74.22% 81.84% 81 .90% 92.19% 21 .61% 21 .86% 50.86% 66.67% 66.86% 77.00% 83.44% 83.49% 95.20% 19.47% 19.54% 41.47% 60.92% 63.78% 70.05% 80.65% 80.68% 88.01% HJ2 Forecast Allocated to Months Using Average Collection Pattern Percentage, FY2019 Actual Collections and Strai ht Line Extra elation from Year-to-Date Collections JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 0.434 1.009 1.014 2.120 3.147 3.176 3.620 3.992 3.995 4.497 0.597 1.113 1.125 2.190 3.661 3.688 4.341 4.576 4.576 5.479 12.2% 22.8% 23.1% 44.9% 75.0% 75.6% 89.0% 93.8% 93.8% 112.3% Monthly Collections JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 0.328 0.349 0.002 1.090 0.350 0.099 0.255 0.385 0.006 0.286 0.283 0.542 0.007 0.781 0.920 0.002 0.383 0.262 -0.002 0.504 0.458 0.388 0.001 0.964 1.023 0.008 0.431 0.274 0.002 0.459 0.536 0.411 0.011 0.891 0.964 0.004 0.252 0.481 0.003 0.302 0.246 0.760 0.001 0.988 1.121 0.008 0.572 0.185 0.002 0.588 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Average High Low Fiscal Note Forecas Actual Collections JUL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.458 JUL 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% JUL 0.000 0.458 Medical Marijuana Sales Tax Cumulative End-of-Month Collections $ million AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.391 0.400 0.405 0.798 0.840 0.859 1.296 0.542 0.565 0.286 0.308 0.351 0.616 0.701 0.725 1.059 Average Colleciton Pattern Assuming Proportional Revenue Collection Percent of FYE Revenue Collected b End of Month AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 0.00% 0.00% 29.03% 29.66% 30.04% 59.20% 62.35% 63.73% 96.18% 0.00% 0.00% 29.03% 29.66% 30.04% 59.20% 62.35% 63.73% 96.18% 0.00% 0.00% 29.03% 29.66% 30.04% 59.20% 62.35% 63.73% 96.18% Fiscal Note Forecast Allocated to Months Using Average Collection Pattern Percentage, FY2019 Actual Collections and Strai ht Line Extra olation from Year-to-Date Collections AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 0.000 0.000 0.177 0.181 0.183 0.361 0.381 0.389 0.587 0.542 0.565 0.286 0.308 0.351 0.616 0.701 0.725 ' 1.059 MAY JUN FYE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.332 1.347 1.347 1.106 1.136 1.172 MAY JUN FYE 98.88% 100.00% 100.00% 98.88% 100.00% 100.00% 98.88% 100.00% 100.00% MAY JUN FYE 0.604 0.610 0.610 1.106 1.136 1.172 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY201 8 FY2019 Average High Low HJ2 Forecast JUL 1.140 1.795 2.266 2.274 1.784 2.244 JUL 8.92% 10.53% 6.49% JUL 2.195 Accommodations Sales Tax Cumulative End-of-Month Collections $ million AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 4.066 4.173 7.666 10.940 11.717 13.319 14.383 14.473 15.509 4.614 4.731 8.890 12.640 12.956 14.368 15.932 16.049 17.321 4.774 4.965 10.009 14.707 14.929 16.126 18.008 18.099 19.193 5.196 5.412 10.238 14.639 14.894 16.467 18.040 18.268 19.485 5.663 5.831 10.678 15.647 16.009 17.462 19.467 19.536 20.753 5.957 6.230 11 .212 16.492 16.753 18.809 20.805 21.036 23.589 Five Year Average Collection Pattern (FY2014 - FY2018) Percent of FYE Revenue Collected b End of Month AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 23.43% 24.20% 45.75% 66.08% 67.94% 74.91% 82.71% 83.28% 88.91% 24.07% 24.79% 46.83% 68.36% 69.40% 75.81% 83.71% 84.13% 89.72% 22.19% 23.08% 43.64% 62.27% 66.70% 74.22% 81.87% 82.39% 88.21% HJ2 Forecast Allocated to Months Using Average Collection Pattern Percentage, FY2019 Actual Collections and Strai ht Line Extra elation from Year-to-Date Collections AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 5.763 5.953 11 .255 16.254 16.71 3 18.428 20.346 20.487 21.870 MAY JUN FYE 17.379 17.514 17.568 19.209 19.360 19.306 21.276 21.446 21 .513 21.842 21.898 21.861 23.276 23.557 23.527 25.656 25.811 25.783 MAY JUN FYE 99.24% 100.00% 100.00% 99.91% 100.28% 100.00% 98.90% 99.69% 100.00% MAY JUN FYE 24.411 24.599 24.599 Actual Collections 2.244 5.957 6.230 11.212 16.492 16.753 18.809 20.805 21.036 23.589 25.656 25.811 25.783 % of HJ2 Extrapolation FY2014 Ideas for temporary housing relief Dec. 9, 2019: From Michelle Alverson 406-577-4395 TO: Mayor Andrus Commissioner Terry Cuningham Dear All, I have spoken, although not in front of you, simply because of my health issues, but through letters and calls and various columns. Housing matters to everyone at the moment. You have a great many families suffering in Bozeman due to the rental market. I took the time to look this up in the Bozeman Municipal Code "Quality of Life of Residents," is mentioned 146 times in our city codes. This idea of hold on we are trying to do our best when it comes to housing is not upholding the Quality of Life many Bozeman Residents have come to love. Throwing constant symposiums and the Citizens Housing r Board as wells as the Community Housing Needs Assessment done by 2 people one from Jackson Hole and the other from Lake Tahoe - WHY? I read that whole thing 3 times. I can see the infuence of their areas in the report. I have three suggestions that can actually bring some relief NOW versus in 5 years - which is what many of the housing assessment report depends on and they also make the assumptions that everything will stay as it is . lam not referring to low income renters, but rather a combo of income based sliding scale up to 33% of total family income and a rent cap using Ocotber 2019 rates (they have no summer rentals included and no student rates included that's why that month is the best) with a sunset in the code and also a vacancy fee be cause when units are vacant that directly effects water. sewer. and other city services. Oakland for example - WHOSE RENTS ARE LESS THEN OURS - charges S6.00 per sq ft for an empty unit in an unblighted area and$ I 0. per sq ft in a blighted area. Your budgets are based on X amount of services, vvhen those services are not being used it can create budget issues for you. Three Things to do now that would HELP FAMILIES NOW: 1 If you instituted a rent sliding scale income based rents, from 150% of Federal Poverty Level which would be $25,385.00 for a family of2 to 46,000.00 (low wrung of median income for family of 2) for two years, add the sunset language into the code. Use HRDC or someone like that to oversee it they have the ability. Make it a special RFP- Ideally with no additional staff costs built in. 2.Freeze Rents at October's 2019 rates (see enclosed) for a period of 24 months, again add the suunset language into the code. 3.Add a Vacancy Fee identical to Oakland's $6.00 per sq ft for non blighted areas, and $10. per sq ft for blighted areas. This you can sunset but if it becomes obvious that this works you can always extend the sunset date. 'While property management companies may scream, remember they charge potential renters up to $65. non refundable just to app ly. and if landowners complain let's remember who actually pays those property taxes IT IS THE RENTERS' No landlord makes rent where all expenses are not included, insurance and property ta.\es. __ ... ___ ... ___ .... __ .._ _________________________ . ___ --------- These three things allow time to pass and wages to catch up a bit, people to settle a bit more, hopefully do away with the 3 and 6 month leases that do nothing but artificially increase the rental pnces. I saw in Ask Bozeman on Facebook just this week a gal signed a six month lease and one month in the management company started raising her rent by 35 . a month to "gear up" to vvhere they wanted it. That is pure greed. I truly hope you will consider these options and notjust continue the cycle of running out and not caring because you are hurting the "Quality of Life of the very Residents,'' you are supposed to be govemmg These actions will make a huge difference in 24 months time. While other policies failed like rent control, all of these come with sunset dates and can equalize things for a pocket of renters that measure 53% in total. Please see the www.rentjungle.com tables on exactly how much rents have gone up. We truly need to slow the market. MY RESPONSE LETTER SENT TO COMMISSIONER CUNINGHAM AND TO MAYOR ANDRUS As a former State Representative, and a former City Commissioner in ::i Mun lana town, I took a great deal of time to ensure what J purposed would be legal and not out of bounds. I doub le checked all of the landlord tenant statutes there is nothing in there that would preclude a temporary rent hold while wages, policy and additional housing come online and catch up. I did take the time to go through federal law specifically as it applies to bacl actors in a free market. which we have now. Since we can get a special program authorization and va ri ation from HUD it seems like something we should take advantage of. Consumer laws on the fed eral level would supercede and through that you could actually slow the market. AGATN NOT FOREVER as r purposed sunset language, if we take the time to do it now we have a healthier market in 3 years instead of more and more desperate families paying higher and higher rent, child care, etc a11d the very real possibility of outer lying communities staiiing to charge an "out of area" surc harge to a renter who works in Bozeman but lives in out lying towns .. Belgrade, Clyde Park, Livingston, Three Forks, Manhattan, Logan because their city services and budgets are not prepared thi s is the offset to that budget pressure. Specific to Montana, ram not sure if you realize this but the Rights enumerated in the beginning of'tlur 1972 Constitution are very clear about Quality of life and the expectations of that See A1iicle 3 and 4. Of course if you the entire commission to beholden ONLY to landl ords anti 11 0 1 really to renters then the most obvious thing to do would be to use the HUGE pots of Affordabl e Housing money available in the Bozeman Fiscal office to make the the landlords whole and to help l;m1ili es get keep their budgets in line at 33% of their income and I do know there is quite a lot o t· rhose funds because I know someone who works in that office. I can understand why you want the vacancy fee because a city budget is always based on usage. Again I read the housing assessment 3 times, PEOPLE ARE SICK OFT/\ LI( T/\ LK TALK they want and rightly expect you the Commission to act in the best interests of City residents. J double checked "Quality of Life of Bozeman Residents," is mentioned 146 times. In the Municipal Code of Bozeman. Taking 24 months so that the policy of the Commission can catch up and the wages can catch up aas well as more housing to come online and if need be utilizing the affordable hou ~ing funds that are just sitting there then so be it, but you cannot expect people to be patient !'or 3(1 to 60 months while more housing comes on line. I can't move, I have the world's 80th worst case ofCrohn's Disease r ha,c to be able tu get to a hospital with medical professionals who know me within no more then ten minutes 1\ h husband and I have lived in a motel for 2 years, paid over $3,000. in application fees only to be told :-iOrncone else got it, or 30 other reasons. My grandmother instilled something special in me that what I go through other:-; do 10 and I should work to fix the road behind me and with every poicy I haw ,,orked ,, irh that gna l in mind . The reason I cannot move is my health and my husband's health and _job. My grandmother was the postmaster at Gallatin Gate,, ay for o,cr :~ >Cc1r, Ill\ farnih settled there when it was Salesville and my great grandparents James 0 \ ersrreet S: \ ell ( h cr, trcet built the first hotel which is now a private residence. My great great grandfather \\ a~ 3 dra t't tc,1111 d11\ ,'r when they drug the Sequoia logs up and down to West Yello,, stone to bui ld th-:t r.:•:1,~ 1,,,,: -\ ::.er th.i t he became the personal driver for Dr. Caroline McGill. To be frank I find your tone of dismissiveness offensi,e 3nd basic all :, :..':,'.t i:·.~ me C1ii :l, e head like a 3 year old or like I am ignorant and it is not appreciated. If you li ke I :im ~c :ta ,r: \\C c:i n use the initiative process, 1 am very well aware of how to do that I do my researc h So if your answe1· to me truly is do nothing and just wait for 3 to 5 years I would like you to state that in plain language. If you read my letter you would know I read the Housing assessment 3 times. Also you have got to do away with 3 and 6 moth leases they artificially inflate the rents. If read the chaiis I sent you would have noticed it went all the back to 2011 to current. Honestly the ENTIRE commission cannot sit on their hands and expect people to rise to the market -- families are strapped. The Commission's job IS THE WORK OF THE PEOPLE and right now you have hung every single renter out to dry for the last 24 months no,,· we are supposed to wait even longer - This makes Bozeman ripe of an initiative not from me but from anyone because action is what people are looking for whether it be positive or negative ACTION NO MORE TALK. Thanks in advance for taking time to read this, but please do not patronize me. T do my research based on similar rental markets to Bozeman I pride my self on that. It is my hope you will actually do something because inaction is not the answer and you cannot expect people to be okay with doing absolutely nothing. Frankly I am angry because we have done NOTHING in 2 years what does that really say about how much the Commission cares about Bozeman Residents Quality of Life, to me it says you will never care about me because I am not rich enough. Take Good Care, Michelle Al~rson 406-577-4395 From Rent Jungle .com Rates from 2011 through October 2019 https://"vw,v.rentjungle.com/average-rent-in-bozeman-mt-rent-trends/ Bozeman Rent Trends The average apartment rent over t he prior 6 months in Bozeman has increased by SGS (s.s0 ,;, One bedroom units have increased by S10 (1.Hc) and two bedroom apartments have increased by S126 (11q,) 2 000 - c,oo 1 000 500 0 All Beds 1 Beds -2 Beds Month All Beds 1 Beds 2 Beds 1/2012 521 464 584 1/2013 996 555 763 1/2014 1,292 625 892 1/2015 1,113 660 740 1/2016 1,228 877 1,031 1/2017 1,201 830 1,070 1/2018 1,160 702 1,141 1/2019 1,173 875 1,149 10/2011 632 485 614 10/2012 538 475 532 10/2013 935 0 913 10/2014 1,203 669 854 10/2015 1,305 755 1,101 10/2016 1,021 683 1,031 10/2017 1,197 738 1,071 10/2018 1,137 954 1,080 10/2019 1,294 998 1,323 11/2011 606 593 570 11/2012 481 475 450 11/2013 1,213 650 995 11/2014 1,238 640 747 11/2015 1,209 769 1,072 11/2016 1,024 656 997 11/2017 1,150 722 1,107 Month All Beds 1 Beds 2 Beds 11/2018 1,168 925 1,192 11/2019 1,238 885 1,275 12/2011 590 520 574 12/2012 1,109 475 700 12/2013 1,402 640 995 12/2014 1,142 686 800 12/2015 1,234 720 1,075 12/2016 1,197 824 1,070 12/2017 1,176 739 1,187 12/2018 1,232 1,083 1,249 2/2012 585 488 585 2/2013 564 542 615 2/2014 1,021 575 854 2/2015 1,268 695 774 2/2016 1,213 898 1,132 2/2017 1,220 950 1,098 2/2018 1,208 729 1,161 2/2019 1,125 823 1,014 3/2012 586 490 570 3/2013 631 0 639 3/2014 956 541 782 3/2015 1,262 709 839 3/2016 1,250 833 1,209 3/2017 1,175 903 1,069 3/2018 1,149 732 1,113 3/2019 1,341 945 1,158 4/2012 543 488 585 4/2013 642 521 698 4/2014 864 539 761 4/2015 1,091 707 876 4/2016 1,041 739 978 4/2017 1,141 830 1,100 4/2018 1,123 741 1,070 4/2019 1,438 922 1,500 5/2012 470 479 548 5/2013 735 697 722 5/2014 841 597 795 5/2015 1,039 717 860 5/2016 1,178 839 1,145 .. Month All Beds 1 Beds 2 Beds 5/2017 1,118 788 1,121 5/2018 1,205 794 1,156 6/2012 660 700 591 6/2013 871 778 659 6/2014 1,034 583 778 6/2015 1,145 679 886 6/2016 1,178 838 1,132 6/2017 1,114 816 1,110 6/2018 1,203 885 1,172 7/2012 687 700 602 7/2013 875 560 617 7/2014 1,131 660 892 7/2015 1,191 744 956 7/2016 1,236 902 1,125 7/2017 1,162 787 1,139 7/2018 1,252 851 1,161 8/2012 849 0 634 8/2013 1,167 0 783 8/2014 1,248 676 897 8/2015 1,187 728 1,002 8/2016 1,246 909 1,182 8/2017 1,1 92 758 1,143 8/2018 1,247 881 1,198 9/2011 605 0 585 9/2012 495 495 536 9/2013 1,089 0 954 9/2014 1,193 656 844 9/2015 1,310 700 1,100 9/2016 1,105 708 1,062 9/2017 1,214 798 1,109 9/2018 1,235 921 1,143 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 30 25 20 "C ' 15 ~ E ff'> 10 5 0 30 25 20 "C ' 15 § E ff'> 10 5 0 9.12% JUL 1.140 1.795 2.266 2.274 1.784 2.244 FY2014 -><- FY2015 --+--- FY2016 ...._ FY2017 - FY2018 FY2019 JUL AUG --+--- HJ2 Forecast 24.22% AUG 2.926 2.819 2.507 2.922 3.878 3.713 SEP Extrapolation from YTD - - Actual Collections JUL AUG SEP 25.33% SEP 0.107 0.117 0.191 0.217 0.169 0.273 OCT OCT 45.58% 67.04% 68.10% 76.46% 84.58% Monthly Collections OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB 3.493 3.274 0.777 1.601 1.065 4.159 3.750 0.316 1.412 1.563 5.044 4.698 0.223 1.196 1.883 4.826 4.400 0.255 1.573 1.574 4.847 4.968 0.363 1.452 2.005 4.982 5.280 0.261 2.056 1.996 Cumulative Accommodations Sales Tax Receipts NOV NOV Through End of Month DEC JAN FEB Accommodations Sales Tax Collections v. Forecast DEC JAN FEB Page4 MAR MAR 85.51% 95.90% MAR APR 0.090 1.036 0.117 1.273 0.091 1.094 0.228 1.216 0.069 1.218 0.231 2.554 104.30% MAY 1.870 1.888 2.083 2.357 2.522 2.066 104.93% JUN 0.135 0.151 0.170 0.057 0.281 0.155 ----ttlo-----u;,l 104.81% 24.599 FYE 0.054 -0.054 0.067 -0.037 -0.029 -0.028 APR MAY JUN FYE APR MAY JUN FYE % of Fiscal Note 74 .95% 88.73% 92.56% 46.77% 50.38% 57.53% 100.94% 114.79% 118.75% 173.49% 181 .20% 186.03% 191.93% Extrapolation FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 <IJ C ~ .E ,. <IJ C ~ .E ,. 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 -0.1 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 JUL 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.458 - FY2014 FY2015 - FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 AUG 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.084 SEP OCT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.391 0.023 -0.279 Monthly Collections NOV DEC JAN 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.009 0.005 0.393 0.022 0.044 0.265 Medical Marijuana Sales Tax Through End of Month / .--~ "'~~ / .g------- JUL -· ,/ !.r--~ ;/ . ~ l:l at It ~! AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB FEB 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.042 0.085 Medical Marijuana Sales Tax Collections v. Forecast JUL AUG -+- Fiscal Note Forecast Extrapolation from YTD ----Actual Collections SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB Page 37 fl MAR MAR MAR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.019 0.024 ~ APR APR APR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.437 0.334 Pi MAY MAY MAY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036 0.047 {q JUN JUN 1.172 JUN FYE 0.000 -0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.029 0.036 ~ FYE FYE 0.597 0.516 0.012 1.065 1.471 0.028 0.652 0.235 0.000 0.904 Rental Car Tax Through End of Month FY2014 IJ FY2015 5 .....,..__ FY2016 -+-FY2017 4 --+-FY2018 FY2019 (/) C 3 .~ E .,. 2 MAY JUN FYE 3.517 3.517 3.479 3.859 3.866 3.868 4.249 4.253 4.252 4.374 4.378 4.380 4.798 4.815 4.812 5.675 5.687 5.692 MAY JUN FYE 100.03% 100.18% 100.00% 101 .08% 101 .09% 100.00% 99.71% 99.95% 100.00% MAY JUN FYE 4.880 4.887 4.878 5.675 5.687 5.692 116.3% 116.6% 116.7% 5.692 MAY JUN FYE 0.366 0.000 -0.038 0.177 0.007 0.002 0.241 0.003 -0.001 0.519 0.004 0.002 0.328 0.017 -0.003 0.196 0.011 0.005 Iii 0 +------------ ------------- ------------- - - ------ -~ (/) C ~ .E ,. 6 5 4 3 2 JUL AUG -+- HJ2 Forecast Extrapolation from YTD Actual Collections SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN Rental Car Tax Collections v. Forecast FEB MAR APR MAY JUN FYE 0+----- --------------------------- ----- - ------ ---~ JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN FYE Page 44 22.19% 23.08% 43.49% 63.97% 64.98% 72.95% 80.69% 81 .59% 88.21% HJ2 Forecast Allocated to Months Using Average Collection Pattern Percentage, FY2020 Actual Collections and Strai ht Line Extra olation from Year-to-Date Collections AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 6.172 6.400 12.020 17.460 17.794 19.606 21.730 21 .904 23.636 6.711 6.905 13.154 18.308 25.44% 26.17% 49.86% 69.40% 18.658 20.557 22.785 22.967 24.783 Monthly Collections AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 2.819 0.117 4.159 3.750 0.316 1.412 1.563 0.117 1.273 2.507 0.191 5.044 4.698 0.223 1.196 1.883 0.091 1.094 2.922 0.217 4.826 4.400 0.255 1.573 1.574 0.228 1.216 3.878 0.169 4.847 4.968 0.363 1.452 2.005 0.069 1.218 3.713 0.273 4.982 5.280 0.261 2.056 1.996 0.231 2.554 3.271 0.193 6.249 5.154 Cumulative Accommodations Sales Tax Receipts Through End of Month " ., MAY JUN FYE 19.209 19.360 19.306 21.276 21 .446 21 .513 21 .842 21.898 21.861 23.276 23.557 23.527 25.656 25.811 25.783 MAY JUN FYE 99.35% 100.07% 100.00% 99.91% 100.28% 100.00% 98.90% 99.69% 100.00% MAY JUN FYE 26.207 26.399 26.380 27.479 27.680 27.660 MAY JUN FYE 1.888 0.151 -0.054 2.083 0.170 0.067 2.357 0.057 -0.037 2.522 0.281 -0.029 2.066 0.155 -0.028 " ., JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN FYE 30 25 20 VI C 15 .~ E "' 10 5 0 --HJ2 Forecast Extrapolation from YTD - Actual Collections JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV Accommodations Sales Tax Collections v. Forecast DEC JAN FEB Page 4 MAR APR MAY JUN FYE FY2019 FY2020 "C ' .Q E "' 1: 1 : : i J 1 21 1 j 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 3 2 5 I JUL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.458 0.364 FY2018 -a-- FY2019 ,. -· FY2020 JL1L ~UG AUG 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.084 0.028 SEP ) - --~--~-- .. JUL AUG SEP 0.992 1.486 1.58 1 SEP OCT 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.391 0.023 0.286 0.047 0.407 .. ~ ; Monthly Collections NOV DEC JAN 0 000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.009 0.005 0.393 0.022 0.044 0.265 0.110 Medical Marijuana Sales Tax Through End of Month FEB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.042 0.085 -· - -r'f----- l~ . ,,. . -:r~·· - - ':"' OCT NOV seal Nole Forecast xtrapolation from YTD ctual Collections ___ ! DEC JAN FEB Medical Marijuana Sales Tax Collections v. Forecast MAR 1.61 4 2.193 2.255 2.289 2.316 MAR APR MAY JUN FYE 0 000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.019 0.437 0.036 0.015 0.000 0.024 0.334 0.047 0.029 0.036 -- -t.~--· •-rt---- --1. // APR MAY JUN FYE -- - ,--··---r- ---~ - ,- - ~ -,-- - - -------.---- - - ,----, OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN FYE Actual Collections %of HJ2 Extrapolation JUL 0.496 0.808 15.0% FY2015 FY2016 FY201 7 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 U) J? C E "' 6 5 4 7 JUL 0.283 0.458 0.536 0.246 0.597 0.808 FY2015 __,._. FY2016 -+-FY2017 -+-FY2018 -,..- FY2019 --FY2020 ---" JUL ;\UG 1.1 09 1.287 23.9% AUG 0.542 0.388 0.411 0.760 0.516 0.479 SEP 11 -+- HJ2 Forecast 6 5 t , ...... ~ """ "°' ! ~'-- Actual Collections U) C 4 1 --------- ~ E (/) 3 2 i ;J - o L----.- JuL AUG SEP 1.116 1.313 24 .4% SEP 0.007 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.012 0.026 OCT OCT 2.214 2.439 45.3% OCT 0.781 0.964 0.891 0.988 1.065 1. 125 NOV 3.501 3.958 73.5% 3.513 4.049 3.713 4.280 Monthl Collections NOV DEC JAN 0.920 0.002 0.383 1.023 0.008 0.431 0.964 0.004 0.252 1.121 0.008 0.572 1.471 0.028 0.652 1.519 Rental Car Tax Through End of Month DEC JAN Rental Car Tax Collections v. Forecast FEB ,,.-..l / ,._ ___ ...... - NOV DEC JAN FEB Page 45 4.385 4.635 FEB 0.262 0.274 0.481 0.185 0.235 MAR MAR 4.387 5. 032 tl.637 5.319 MAR APR -0.002 0.504 0.002 0.459 0.003 0.302 0.002 0.588 0.000 0.904 5.374 5.680 MAY 0177 0.241 0.519 0.328 0.196 JUN 5.384 5.691 JUN 0.007 0.003 0.004 0.017 0.011 _. ... -- --- ----~----- .., _,. .. ,.,. APR MAY JUN -~-~---- - APR MAY JUN ;: ·. E - . - .. ... ·: - . - .... : · - .• - :, - - - :- -== .! F'•' E 1(~ ~ : ', 1 :·J: ::: i C C :,: ~: FYE 5 3C: 5.E,2 F :: C,~12 -C : :; · (('2 -G C' 0 c::