HomeMy WebLinkAboutFLUM GP_Comments 1-8-20Comment
ID Comment
1601 Having a residential designation next to I-90 doesn't seem to be in the best interest of the public.
2001
Please notice the income level of residents living in this zone. Historically, low income
populations are at higher risk for poor health outcomes; many times because of the built
environment and land use planning. Zoning of industrial for the mid section of land between the
two lower income neighborhoods puts the resident population at higher risk for poor health
outcomes.
In the plan, Public health and safety means a condition of optimal well-being, free from danger
or injury, for a community at large, as well as for an individual or small group of persons." To be
consistent with this definition, care must be taken in zoning industrial near residential, and
2401
Why are parks, open space, fairgrounds, municipal buildings all show as green or public lands
and institutions?
2402 Is this rally parks and open space? The Court House is farther to the east.
2403
Why are these roads omitted from the adjacent designation when all other roads adopt the
adjacent land use?
2404
Prime location for a small community commercial node of Community Commercial Mixed Use,
providing live-work and community-scale retail opportunities for the surrounding
neighborhoods, multi-modal corridor, and regional park.
2405 Residential Mixed Use - good opportunity to align increased density with the Oak corridor.
2406 Residential Mixed Use - Aligning Increased Density with Oak Corridor
2407 Residential Mixed Use
2408
Residential Mixed Use to better align with current uses and Fowler Multi-Modal Transportation
Corridor
2409 Would Residential Mixed Use be more appropriate given the surroundings?
2410 Residential Mixed Use
2801
With the evolving nature of retail and commerce are the boundaries of Regional Commercial
correct? Should they be changed, reduced, expanded, or...?
2802
The Bozeman Health sub-area plan suggests this is residential. Also, the expansion of open space
and parks in the area suggests this designation is not correct.
2803 Should this commercial center be relocated. Perhaps across the road?
2804
The City Commission has changed the use of this area from commercial to residential. The future
land should reflect that change of mind.
2805 This area won't be developed it does have city services.
2806
This is a perfect place for REMU, aligning increased density with this future multi-modal
transportation corridor.
2807
At the risk of starting a land war with the county, could we designate a portion (or most) of the
current fairgrounds as Residential Mixed Use? Having our fairgrounds in the middle of our dense
urban environment doesn't make a lot of sense. Could we retain the portions that get frequent
2808 Residential Mixed Use transition zone?
2809 Residential Mixed Use Transition Zone
2810 Residential Mixed Use
3201 Support change to Regional Commercial.
3601 This is our property. How was this designation determined?
4001 Need to add Gallatin High
4002
Consider Residential Mixed Use on north side of College, to allow for future services and
commercial/residential development to serve neighborhoods and campus?
4003
Residential mixed use would make sense here-- transitioning commercial nodes on 19th and
Babcock with 27th corridor. Rose Park provides nice central greenspace.
4402 With development of Cannery and Public Safety Center, make Rouse into
4801
Open Space, Parks, and conservation areas should be separated from Public Institution uses.
Need differentiation when developing park and open space plans for CIP and data collection
purposes. Need to see connections from an ecological, habitat, and preservation standpoint.