The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-06-20 City Commission Packet Materials - A1. Res. 5104, Adoption of CIP for FY21-25Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 5104 -The adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 5104 -The adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2021-2025. BACKGROUND: Planning for capital improvements is a matter of prudent financial management, as well as sound development practice. At times of rapid growth, as we are experiencing, the need for expanded public facilities and services is at its peak. A carefully developed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for these expansions aids in communicating our intent to citizens and the development community. Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a multi-year Capital Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th . During the months of October, November, and December numerous staff meetings have taken place to develop this recommended plan. The program is designed and planned by fund. Within those funds, the method for paying for the project is determined. In the case of more-expensive projects, or where resources are scarce, borrowing may be required and bonds and other funding mechanisms may be used. The CIP is 183 adopted each year, but nothing is actually approved for spending until it is included in an approved budget. In addition, certain funding is not final until approved by voters on an election ballot. All the funds were presented to the Commission via consent and action as stated in the table below: UNRESOLVED ISSUES: The possible creation of a Park Maintenance District and the General Fund implications. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. If the Commission does not wish to adopt the resolution tonight, it can be scheduled for approval on a later agenda but must be done before March 15th. Fund Agenda Commission Meeting Fire Impact fee Consent 11/4/2019 Arterial and collector Action 11/18/2019 Street Impact Fee Action 11/18/2019 Street maintenance Consent 11/18/2019 Vehicle Maintenance Fund Consent 11/18/2019 Building Inspection Consent 11/18/2019 Community Development Consent 11/18/2019 Street & Curb Consent 11/18/2019 Solid Waste Consent 11/18/2019 Stormwater Consent 11/18/2019 Wastewater Action 12/2/2019 Wastewater Impact Fee Action 12/2/2019 Water Impact Fee Action 12/2/2019 Library Depreciation Action 12/2/2019 Water Consent 12/2/2019 Fire & Capital Equipment Consent 12/2/2019 Public Works admin fund Consent 12/2/2019 Parking Consent 12/2/2019 Parks and Trails Action 12/9/2019 General Fund Action 12/9/2019 Forestry Consent 12/9/2019 184 FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for FY21. Projects and equipment purchases can only be made after being included in an Approved Budget. Report compiled on: December 18, 2019 Attached: Resolution 5104 Capital Improvement Plan FY21-FY25 185 RESOLUTION NO. 5104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021 TO 2025. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Charter Article 5.06 requires the City Manager too submit a multi-year capital program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, that the Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2021 to 2025, as attached hereto and by this reference made a part here to of, is hereby adopted. 186 PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 6th day of January, 2020. ___________________________________ CHRIS MEHL Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ MIKE MAAS Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 187 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s P l a n F I S C A L Y E A R S 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 5 P r e s e n t e d A n d A d o p t City of Bozeman, Montana Adopted Capital Improvements Program For Fiscal Years 2021‐2025 Presented And Adopted during Public Meetings held November 2019 – January 2020 2019 City Commission Cynthia Andrus, Mayor Chris Mehl, Deputy Mayor Terry Cunningham, Commissioner Jeff Krauss, Commissioner I‐Ho Pomeroy, Commissioner City Staff Andrea Surratt, City Manager Anna Rosenberry, Assistant City Manager Kristin Donald, Finance Director Robin Crough, City Clerk 2020 City Commission Chris Mehl, Mayor Cynthia Andrus, Deputy Mayor Terry Cunningham, Commissioner I‐Ho Pomeroy, Commissioner Michael Wallner, Commissioner City Staff Denis Taylor, Interim City Manager Anna Rosenberry, Assistant City Manager Kristin Donald, Finance Director Robin Crough, City Clerk 189 CIP MESSAGE Dear City Commission and Residents of Bozeman: We are proud to present to you the City of Bozeman, 2021 ‐ 2025 Capital Improvement Program. This five‐year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a commitment to improving and maintaining the City of Bozeman’s facilities, parks and roads to aid in the vision of Bozeman being the most livable place. The CIP performed in compliance with State and municipal code, State Law requires the City to maintain a Capital Improvement Plan for our Development Impact Fee programs. Under Montana Code Annotated (MCA), this Capital Improvement Plan provides the schedules and cost projections required under MCA §7‐6‐1602(2) (k) (i‐iv). In Article 5.06 of the adopted City Charter, the City Manager is responsible for preparing and submitting a multi‐year capital program to the City Commission no later than December 15 for the ensuing fiscal year. This five‐year plan includes long‐range plans for our current facilities while keeping in mind level of service standards. In a community with relatively high cost of living, the ability of citizens to afford the needed utility rate, fee, and assessment levels is of concern. At the same time, the City strives to keep existing facilities properly maintained — and not pass deferred maintenance costs and problems on to future generations. The staff have taken a lot of time and care in preparing this document. Plan Challenges The City’s General Fund portion of the CIP contains, by far, the greatest number of capital items and pays for a broad range of departmental needs. The General Fund portion of the plan is made up of numerous departments and contains their projects and equipment purchases. These items are funded through the General fund revenue, which is made up of property taxes, entitlement share, charges for services, and fines and fees. Certain items in the General Fund are planned to be funded by a bonds approved on an election ballot, as well. For two years now, the most significant issue in developing the General Fund’s capital improvement plan has been the creation of a Parks and Trails Maintenance District. The City’s Strategic Plan directs us: 4.3 a Develop a Comprehensive Parks Maintenance Facilities Funding Program that would provide funding for Parks, including their capital needs. This is significant because it would remove millions of dollars of Parks capital improvement costs from the General Fund, and move them to a separate fund with a dedicated annual assessment for a funding source. Last year, the Commission adopted a General Fund CIP that planned for creation of the Parks & Trails Maintenance District in FY21. Because of 190 district creation, we removed the Parks division projects from the General Fund CIP starting in FY21 – but left all of the General Fund money remaining in the plan to allow us to increase General Fund capital projects in future years. This year’s plan follows the concept adopted last year, where the City creates a District beginning in FY21 and the General Fund capital amount is not reduced. We removed the Parks capital items from the General Fund CIP, and created a separate Park & Trails District CIP. Strategic Plan The Strategic Plan helps inform the planning and decision process for the CIP. Below highlight some of the items included in the plan:  The General fund allocates for Fiber Optic Conduit this aids in our efforts for 2.2 a Identify Commercial/ Industrial Infrastructure Needs.  3.1 c Implement the Fire Station Location Plan with scheduled Fire Station 2 relocation for FY23.  3.4 Active Recreation is included throughout the General fund plan and the Parks & Trails District Fund with many projects that encourage and promote active recreation such as the proposed aquatics/recreation center, GF056. We have several park amenities proposed with splashpads and pickleball courts in the plan as well.  We have proposed the creation of a Parks and Trails Maintenance District that works towards 4.3 a Develop a Comprehensive Parks Maintenance Facilities Funding Program that would provide funding for Parks’ capital needs.  The Wastewater fund and Wastewater Impact fund have many projects that achieve 4.3 b Increase Capacity of Sewer Pipes to Accommodate Development Projects.  All the road projects funded by the Street Impact Fee fund and Arterial & Collector fund will include bike lanes and aid in our efforts towards 4.5 a Enhance Non‐motorized Transportation. In addition, every year the Street Maintenance fund has allocation of $25,000 annually has been increased to $50,000 for bike path improvements. In closing, we respectfully submit the 2021 ‐2025 Capital Improvement Plan to the residents of the City of Bozeman. Once adopted, the Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for FY21. The City will continue to invest in capital infrastructure in order to keep Bozeman as a vibrant and active city. Respectfully, Kristin Donald, Finance Director 191 TABLE OF CONTENTS CIP Summary .......................................................................................... Background ...................................................................................... 1 CIP Process ....................................................................................... 2 CIP Funding ...................................................................................... 6 2021‐2025 CIP Project Summary ..................................................... 8 Fund Summaries Arterial & Collector District ........................................................... 12 Building Inspection ....................................................................... 32 Community Development ............................................................. 37 Fire Equipment & Capital .............................................................. 43 Fire Impact Fee ............................................................................. 57 Forestry Tree Maintenance District .............................................. 62 General ......................................................................................... 68 Library Depreciation ................................................................... 124 Parking ........................................................................................ 130 Parks & Trails Maintenance District ………………………………………..137 Public Works Admin Internal Service ………………………………………165 Solid Waste ................................................................................. 173 Stormwater ................................................................................. 183 Street & Curb Reconstruction ..................................................... 207 Street Impact Fee ........................................................................ 221 Street Maintenance .................................................................... 254 Vehilce Maintenance ………………………………………………………………306 Wastewater ................................................................................. 311 Wastewater Impact Fee .............................................................. 340 Water .......................................................................................... 351 Water Impact Fee ……………………………………………………………………389 192 CIP Summary 193 CIP SUMMARY One of the primary responsibilities of local government is to properly preserve, maintain, and improve a community’s stock of buildings, streets, parks, water and sewer lines, and equipment. Planning for these capital improvements is a matter of prudent financial management, as well as sound development practice. At times of rapid growth, as we are experiencing once again, the need for expanded public facilities and services is at its peak. A carefully developed CIP plans for these expansions and communicates our intent to citizens and the development community. In times of economic contraction, like the past‐prolonged recession, capital improvements were often put off (deferred) as a way of trimming budgets. While this can be appropriate in cases, an annual analysis and focus on necessary capital improvements helps to ensure those capital deferrals, and their impact on the community, are fully vetted. Background To provide service to its citizens, a city government needs funding for costs such as salaries, supplies, and other operating items. Most public services also entail costs for furniture, automobiles, other equipment and vehicles, land, and construction of buildings or other public facilities. These costs are separated into two large categories: (1) operating expenditures, and (2) capital outlays. Operating expenditures include personnel costs, day‐to‐day maintenance and operation of City assets, and the acquisition of goods that are consumed or used up as a service is provided. These types of expenses cost less on a unit basis than most capital outlays, and they recur at roughly the same level from year to year. Capital outlays occur on a periodic basis. Within the broad category of capital outlay expenditures, there are two subgroups: (a) capital equipment and (b) capital improvements. The City budgets capital equipment annually through the CIP process. The City budgets capital improvements annually through dedicated revenue. Capital improvement expenses also generate operating costs that must be recognized and accommodated. The CIP includes any planned expenditure of $25,000 or greater, that results in the acquisition of an asset with a useful life of 3 years or more. There is a couple of “exceptions” or “extensions” of this definition that we have found helpful and necessary in past years:  General Planning Documents (master plans, community surveys, etc.) are NOT included in our CIP;  Specific plans that involve pre‐engineering or preliminary design of facilities are often (but not always) included in the CIP. 1 194  Software purchases that could potentially be “software as a service”. Cloud based services are beginning to replace our purchase of outright software and hardware. In the CIP, we have treated the software projects as a capital outlay purchase; although a “service” type, solution may actually be chosen during the bidding/proposal process. State law and City charter require the City to prepare the CIP. State Law requires the City to maintain a Capital Improvement Plan for our Development Impact Fee programs. Under Montana Code Annotated (MCA), this Capital Improvement Plan provides the schedules and cost projections required under MCA §7‐6‐1602(2)(k)(i‐iv). In Article 5.06 of the adopted City Charter, the City Manager is responsible for preparing and submitting a multi‐year capital program to the City Commission no later than December 15 for the ensuing fiscal year. The plan must be revised and extended each year with regard to projects not yet completed. This plan is required to include: 1. A clear general summary of contents; 2. Identification of the long‐term goals of the community; 3. A list of all capital improvements and other capital expenditures which are proposed to be undertaken during the fiscal years next ensuing, with appropriate supporting information as to the necessity for each; 4. Cost estimates and recommended time schedules for each improvement or other capital expenditure; 5. Method of financing upon which each capital expenditure is to be reliant; 6. The estimated annual cost of operating and maintaining the facilities to be constructed or acquired; 7. A commentary on how the plan addresses the sustainability of the community or region of which it is a part; and 8. Methods to measure outcomes and performance of the capital plan related to the long‐term goals of the community. CIP Process Each year, we begin the process of updating our Capital Improvements Plan in September. Finance works in coordination with City departments and the City manager’s Office to recommend projects that can be undertaken within the funds available. The process is completed when the Commission adopts a final budget with capital items approved, usually in the following June, see the following calendar: 2 195 There are many considerations when developing the plan from basic operational needs to growth. The following descriptions are the areas considered when developing the CIP: •Departments make new CIP requests September: •Departments make note of any changes to existing CIP projects. •City Manager and staff meet to review new and existing projects; modify any timing, cost or revenue estimates. •Impact Fee Advisory Committee receives and reviews proposed Impact Fee CIP schedules and forwards comments to City Commission. October/November: •City Manager presents Draft CIP to City Commission prior to December 15th. •City Commission holds public hearings, takes public comment and adopts CIP November/December: Plan for ensuing fiscal year. •Adopted CIP is integrated into City Manager’s Recommended Budget for ensuing fiscal year. •Commission, via adopting a final budget, appropriates dollars for CIP projects for the fiscal year. January ‐ June: 3 196 City Vision and Strategic Goals The City recently adopted goals to develop a five‐year Strategic Plan and revised its vision. The Plan has been the subject of numerous citizen engagement efforts and public meeting discussions. The Strategic Plan initiatives to date have been included and planned for in this CIP. Below are the vision and vision statements adopted by the Commission May 15, 2017: Vision Bozeman remains a safe, inclusive community, fostering civic engagement and creativity, with a thriving diversified economy, a strong environmental ethic, and a high quality of life as our community grows and changes. Strategic Vision Statements: 1) An Engaged Community. We foster a culture of engagement and civic leadership based on innovation and best practices involving community members of all backgrounds and perspectives. 2) An Innovative Economy. We grow a diversified and innovative economy leveraging our natural amenities, skilled and creative people, and educational resources to generate economic opportunities. 3) A Safe, Welcoming Community. We embrace a safe, healthy, welcoming and inclusive community. 4) A Well‐Planned City. We maintain our community's quality of life as it grows and changes, honoring our sense of place and the 'Bozeman feel' as we plan for a livable, affordable, more connected city. 5) A Creative, Learning Culture. We expand learning, education, arts, expression and creativity for all ages. 6) A Sustainable Environment. We cultivate a strong environmental ethic, protecting our clean air, water, open spaces and climate, and promote environmentally sustainable businesses and lifestyles. 7) A High Performance Organization. We operate as an ethical, high performance organization anticipating future needs, utilizing best practices, and striving for continuous improvement. 4 197 Level of Service (LOS) Standards Most of the City’s long‐range plans establish level of service standards. These standards are critical to planning for the needs of future city residents. In some cases, such as water quality or wastewater discharge, these standards are often established or guided by outside regulating bodies. The CIP does not frequently reference specific LOS, but the underlying facility and staffing plans will contain detailed discussions of levels of service, and how the City should address increasing or decreasing levels of service through infrastructure and staffing recommendations. Policies for the Physical Development of our Community The City’s Unified Development Code (UDC) is a combination of both Subdivision and Zoning regulations for development within the City. The Code is subject to amendment by the Commission, after public notices and hearings are held. The UDC applies to both private and city‐owned projects. The City is currently underway with “The Bozeman Code Update,” a public process to update the City’s Unified Development Code (UDC). The UDC covers a diverse range of topics, including, zoning, design standards, subdivisions, wetland, and permit review procedures. The key feature of the update is to translate the community's expectations for development as expressed in the Community Plan into a concise and useable set of regulations. Our Current Facilities and their Condition: The City has a number of long‐range (20‐year) facility plans:  Water Treatment & Distribution Facilities  Wastewater Collection & Treatment Facilities  Stormwater Collection & Treatment Facilities  Fire Station, Equipment & Staffing  Police Station & Staffing  Parks, Recreation, Trails & Open Space  Transportation System Plan 5 198 These studies examine the condition and placement of existing facilities, area growth projections and pattern, regulatory changes, and possible funding mechanisms. The plans analyze various alternatives and make recommendations for implementation. Our Community’s Ability to Pay for Planned Improvements In a community with relatively high cost of living, the ability of citizens to afford the needed utility rate, fee, and assessment levels is of concern. At the same time, the City strives to keep existing facilities properly maintained — and not pass deferred maintenance costs and problems on to future generations. The City has adopted a Utility Rate Studies for Water and Wastewater services. These studies give us an indication of how and when utility rates must be increased to pay for the needed water and wastewater system improvements. For General Fund (Administration, Recreation, Library, Police, and Fire) facilities and Street construction, the City does not have the ability to easily increase tax levels for funding. The City’s voters must approve any tax levy increase, and state law establishes maximum debt levels. In November 2007, the City of Bozeman voters approved a four mill perpetual levy to establish a Fire Equipment and Capital Replacement fund. This fund was added to the CIP plan, and the funds are for replacements of fire engines, ladder trucks, and other capital improvements to fire stations. In the summer of 2015, the city successfully created a citywide Arterial & Collector Street Special District, under the special district laws of the state. The District is meant to fund street maintenance and (re)construction on Arterial & Collector streets that is NOT eligible to be funded by impact fees. The CIP includes a 5‐year plan for capital projects for this new district. CIP Funding The program is designed and planned by fund. Within those funds, the method for funding the project is determined. Some funds have fees or taxes that are specific to capital improvement or maintenance. Some larger projects financing is required and bonds and other funding mechanisms need to be used. The next chart shows the funding for each area in the plan with exception any debt issuance, which can vary year to year depending on the projects and priority for the plan year. The Capital Improvement Program is then adopted but is not considered funded until the Budget is adopted in June. In addition, certain funding is not final until a passing on election ballot. 6 199 General Fund ‐ Taxes and Charges for services Special Revenue Funds •Arterial and Collector District – Assessment, Local Share for projects and Gas Tax •Building Inspection Fund ‐ Charges for services •Community Development Fund ‐ Property tax and charges for services •Fire Equipment and Capital Fund ‐ Dedicated tax 4 Mills •Fire Impact Fee ‐ Impact Fee revenue •Forestry‐ Tree Maintenance District ‐ Tree Assessment •Library Depreciation Fund ‐ Remaining budget from prior year •Parks & Trails District‐ Assessment •Street Impact Fee ‐ Impact Fees •Street and Curb Reconstruction – Assessment and SID •Street Maintenance District ‐ Assessment Governmental Funds Enterprise Funds •Parking Charges for services and enforcement •Solid Waste Fund ‐ Charges for Services •Storm Water Fund ‐ Charges for Services •Wastewater Fund ‐ Charge for Services •Wastewater Impact Fee ‐ Impact fees •Water Fund ‐ Charges for services •Water Impact Fee ‐ Impact fees Internal Service Funds •Public Work Admin Fund – Internal Charges to other funds Proprietary Funds 7 200 2021‐2025 CIP FINANCIAL SUMMARY This five‐year plan has $174 million in scheduled projects and $86 million unscheduled. FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 TOTAL SCHEDULED PROJECTS Unscheduled Arterial and Collector District 1,450,000 2,335,000 3,920,000 1,000,000 1,376,000 10,081,000 2,650,000 Building Inspection Fund ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 357,500 Community Development 335,000 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 635,000 180,000 Fire Equipment & Capital Replacement 166,973 608,718 1,047,680 169,339 509,687 2,502,397 1,421,300 Fire Impact Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,200,000 Forestry 90,000 ‐ 145,000 65,000 75,000 375,000 ‐ General Fund 1,083,580 1,054,530 909,345 5,510,100 21,137,400 29,694,955 1,913,000 Library Depreciation 72,000 72,000 72,000 ‐ ‐ 216,000 ‐ Parks & Trails 570,000 756,000 858,000 938,000 2,249,600 5,371,600 5,325,000 Parking 315,000 250,000 300,000 410,000 300 1,275,300 ‐ Solid Waste Collection & Recycling 368,000 420,000 900,000 320,000 303,075 2,311,075 ‐ Storm Water Utility 900,000 705,000 730,000 750,000 770,000 3,855,000 605,000 Street & Curb Reconstructions 2,871,320 1,496,474 2,388,908 2,112,724 1,861,763 10,731,189 10,104,000 Street Impact Fee 6,030,000 3,400,000 9,420,000 3,700,000 3,526,000 26,076,000 27,600,000 Street Maintenance District 2,392,000 2,802,789 1,922,000 1,936,000 2,395,975 11,448,764 300,000 Wastewater Fund 2,335,000 5,430,000 2,107,818 1,495,903 3,175,594 14,544,315 155,000 Wastewater Impact Fee 525,000 300,000 4,100,000 2,500,000 ‐ 7,425,000 20,245,000 Water Fund 2,542,500 2,178,000 3,283,000 15,635,257 8,400,316 32,039,073 355,000 Water Impact Fee 6,295,729 865,000 7,850,000 400,000 150,000 15,560,729 10,000,000 Internal Service Fund ‐ Vehicle Maint ‐ ‐ 45,000 ‐ 4,350 49,350 ‐ Internal Service Fund ‐ Public Works 165,000 ‐ ‐ 65,000 ‐ 230,000 ‐ Total $ 28,507,102 $ 22,973,511 $ 39,998,751 $ 37,007,323 $ 45,935,060 $ 174,421,747 $ 86,410,800 Scheduled Projects 8 201 2021 ‐ 2025 CIP FINANCIAL SUMMARY Arterial and Collector District 6% Building Inspection Fund 0% Community Development 0% Fire Equipment & Capital Replacement 1% Fire Impact Fee Forestry 0% 0% General Fund 17% Library Depreciation 0% Parks & Trails 3% Parking 1% Solid Waste Collection & Recycling 1% Storm Water Utility 2% Street & Curb Reconstructions 6% Street Impact Fee 15% Street Maintenance District 7% Wastewater Fund 8% Wastewater Impact Fee 4% Water Fund 18% Water Impact Fee 9% TOTAL SCHEDULED PROJECTS 9 202 UNSCHEDULED The unscheduled items are in need within the five years or just after. Several large and high dollar projects remain unscheduled due to funding, timing and other unresolved issues. Arterial and Collector District 3% Fire Impact Fee 7% General Fund 2% Parking 0% Street & Curb Reconstructions 13% Street Impact Fee Street Maintenance District 35% 0% Wastewater Fund 0% Wastewater Impact Fee 26% Water Fund 0% Water Impact Fee 13% UNSCHEDULED 10 203 Fund Summaries 11 204 Arterial & Collector District 12 205 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR DISTRICT FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 158,798 $ (118,377) $ 807,071 $ 903,015 $ (829,681) $ 416,224 Plus: Assessment Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,410,808 $ 1,400,131 $ 1,442,134 $ 1,485,398 $ 1,529,960 $ 1,575,859 $ ‐ Plus: Payback Revenue $ 522,557 $ 300,667 $ 300,667 Plus: New Gas Tax dollars $ 655,000 $ 674,650 $ 688,143 $ 701,906 $ 715,944 $ 730,263 Plus: Contribution from High School SIF105, SIF13, SIF113 $ 1,587,157 Plus: Gas tax for FY19 projects $ 837,801 Less: FY19 Carry Forward $ (2,894,498) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (2,396,000) $ (1,450,000) $ (2,335,000) $ (3,920,000) $ (1,000,000) $ (1,376,000) $ (2,650,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ (118,377) $ 807,071 $ 903,015 $ (829,681) $ 416,224 $ 1,346,346 Beginning Balance of Payback Improvements: $ (2,544,666)$ (2,544,666)$ (2,243,999)$ (1,943,332)$ (1,943,332)$ (1,943,332)$ (1,943,332) SIF080 ‐ Gallatin County SID $667 300,$667 300,$667 300, SIF080‐ Flanders Payback $891 221, SIF113 ‐Griffin (7th to Rouse) Payback District $ (666,667) SIF114‐ Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) Construction PayabackDistrict $ (1,250,000) SIF117 ‐ Storymill (Griffen to Bridger) Payback District $ (83,333) SIF138‐ Cottonwood Road (Oak to Baxter) Payback District $ (333,333) Ending Balance of Payback Improvements: $ (2,544,666)$ (2,243,999)$ (1,943,332)$ (1,943,332)$ (1,943,332)$ (1,943,332)$ (1,943,332) Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Assessment Revenues* $ 1,333,458 $ 1,333,458 $ 1,400,131 $ 1,442,134 $ 1,485,398 $ 1,529,960 Estimated Growth Annual Increase 0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Estimated Rate Annual Increase 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,333,458 $ 1,400,131 $ 1,442,134 $ 1,485,398 $ 1,529,960 $ 1,575,859 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,333,458 $ 1,400,131 $ 1,442,134 $ 1,485,398 $ 1,529,960 $ 1,575,859 Projected Projected CURRENT $(1,450,000) $(2,335,000) $(3,920,000) $(1,000,000) $(1,376,000) $(2,650,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR PROJECTS 13 206 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR DISTRICT FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled SIF086 BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF110 MANLEY & GRIFFIN 400,000 SIF113 GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 500,000 1,500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF114 FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 1,750,000 750,000 ‐ ‐ SIF116 BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 300,000 ‐ ‐ SIF117 STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF118 BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) ‐ 750,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF138 COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 1,670,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF145 ‐ 85,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF 147 OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 500,000 ‐ SIF149 BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 SIF152 N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 SIF153 DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 350,000 SIF154 CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300,000 SIF156 HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 SIF158 College (8th to 19th) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 876,000 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 1,450,000 2,335,000 3,920,000 1,000,000 1,376,000 2,650,000 14 207 Project Street Impact Fee Funding Arterial & Collector Funding Total Project Funding *BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) CONSTRUCTION 2,000,000 500,000 2,500,000 *MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 1,600,000 400,000 2,000,000 *GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 3,500,000 2,000,000 5,500,000 *FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) 5,000,000 2,500,000 7,500,000 *BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 300,000 1,500,000 *STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) 250,000 250,000 500,000 *BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 *COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER 1,670,000 1,670,000 3,340,000 *OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (FY23 for SIF and FY25 for A&C) 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 *BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH 1,800,000 500,000 2,300,000 *N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL 4,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 *DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1,400,000 350,000 1,750,000 *CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION 1,200,000 300,000 1,500,000 *HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 500,000 2,500,000 *COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION 876,000 876,000 1,752,000 15 208 ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR DISTRICT FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND Due to the role Street Impact Fees play in the expansion of our Arterial & Collector streets, the A&CD capital plan is tied to projects on the Street Impact Fee CIP. Most projects receive funding from both sources. The District will be providing the “local share” of some projects in advance of development. The city intends to create a payback district to recover the “local share” once an adjacent project is developed. This payback will be deposited to the Arterial & Collector Fund. We have recorded the amount of “local share” payback improvements are funded each year on the Financial Summary. We anticipate that some of these payback amounts will come back to the Arterial & Collector Fund as projects develop; but for purposes of this plan, we have not relied on receiving any of that money to fund projects. Similar to the Street Impact Fee schedule, this CIP is also impacted by the development waiver policy for certain projects that are within the first 3 years of the Capital Improvements Plan and have all the necessary right‐of‐way and funding plans. The first year of assessment was FY2016 and it has increased in 2017 and 2018. The District’s revenues projections are based on the amounts that were discussed when created the district with a reduction with the increase in gas tax revenue in FY19 and no change in FY20. We are projecting a rate increase of 2% to keep up with inflation. Below are the revenue trends of the assessment and with the gas tax: 565,000 1,095,000 1,826,572 1,333,458 ‐‐221,891 708,000 565,000 1,095,000 2,048,463 2,041,458 ‐ 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 Revenue History Assessment Gas Tax Total 16 209 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Larger projects that will expand capacity to our road network are SIF 113 Griffin (7th to Rouse), which has been coordinated with MDT’s project in the area. SIF114 Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) scheduled for FY23 and FY24 that will increase capacity and extends an important north‐south corridor. SIF157 and SIF158 Is a project for College between 8th and 19th has been moved later in the plan due to funding and other projects. A new project was added to FY 2025 to upgrade the intersection of Oak and 19th (SIF147), which would add an additional lane to the eastbound leg of the intersection. Significant delays are observed on the eastbound leg of this intersection, and this project would improve intersection operations at this location. Funding is scheduled in FY23 in the Street Impact Fee fund so currently the plan has been adopted out of balance. All the road projects funded by the Arterial & Collector District fund will include bike lanes and aid in our efforts towards the Strategic Plan 4.5 a Enhance Non‐motorized Transportation. 17 210 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ 500,000 CONSTRUCTION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION AT BAXTER AND COTTONWOOD. ‐ THIS INTERSECTION IS CURRENTLY 1‐WAY STOP ‐ CONTROLLED. REPLACING IT WITH A SIGNAL OR ‐ ROUNDABOUT WILL GREATLY INCREASE ITS CAPACITY. ‐ EAST‐WEST CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS ‐ LOCATION. NORTH‐SOUTH CONNECTIVITY IS STILL ‐ LACKING. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) ‐ AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE COTTONWOOD CORRIDOR ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AND BAXTER CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ IDENTIFIED IN THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE. ‐ INCLUDES INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL, ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR OTHER ADEQUATE TRAFFIC CONTROL ‐ DEVICE WHEN WARRANTS ARE MET. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 $ 500,000 SIF086 18 211 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # MANLEY & GRIFFIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 400,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION CONTROL AT MANLEY & ‐ GRIFFIN. THIS INTERSECTION IS CURRENTLY 1‐WAY ‐ STOP CONTROLLED. REPLACING IT WITH A SIGNAL WILL ‐ GREATLY INCREASE ITS CAPACITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS ‐ WHICH IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. A PAYBACK DISTRICT ‐ OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER ‐ STAKEHOLDERS. THIS PROJECT WAS MOVED TO COINCIDE ‐ WITH THE GRIFFIN CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTION & MDT'S ‐ GRIFFIN & 7TH PROJECT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LOS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ MANLEY & GRIFFIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2021 SIF110 $ 400,000 19 212 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT W GRIFFIN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS FROM N. ‐ 7TH TO ROUSE TO AN URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. ‐ DESIGNED IMPROVEMENTS WILL IMPROVE LOS AT THE KEY ‐ INTERSECTIONS AND WILL INCREASE CAPACITY IN THE ‐ CORRIDOR AS A WHOLE. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS ‐ AT THIS LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY WHICH IS BEING ‐ EXPANDED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ‐ (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AT GRIFFIN AND 7TH AND GRIFFIN AND ‐ ROUSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (DO NOTHING). ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF OUR ‐ STREET NETWORK AND IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND ‐ PEDESTRIANS. FACILITATES DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY ‐ OCCURRING IN THIS PART OF THE CITY AND NETWORK ‐ PERFORMANCE OVERALL. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1 2021 $ 500,000 SIF113 (FY21) 20 213 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2 1,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT W GRIFFIN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS FROM N. ‐ 7TH TO ROUSE TO AN URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. ‐ DESIGNED IMPROVEMENTS WILL IMPROVE LOS AT THE KEY ‐ INTERSECTIONS AND WILL INCREASE CAPACITY IN THE ‐ CORRIDOR AS A WHOLE. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS ‐ AT THIS LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY WHICH IS BEING ‐ EXPANDED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ‐ (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AT GRIFFIN AND 7TH AND GRIFFIN AND ‐ ROUSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (DO NOTHING). ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF OUR ‐ STREET NETWORK AND IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND ‐ PEDESTRIANS. FACILITATES DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY ‐ OCCURRING IN THIS PART OF THE CITY AND NETWORK ‐ PERFORMANCE OVERALL. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2 2022 $ 1,500,000 SIF113 (FY22) 21 214 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE THE SECTION OF FOWLER FROM HUFFINE TO OAK ‐ THIS PROJECT ALLOWS FOR EXTENSION OF FOWLER AVENUE ‐ WHICH WILL DIRECTLY INCREASE CAPACITY, AND IT ‐ EXTENDS AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH CORRIDOR ON THE ‐ WEST SIDE OF THE CITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH ‐ IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED ‐ TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF ‐ THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ‐ ON FOWLER AT HUFFINE, BABCOCK, DURSTON AND OAK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMPLETES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ON ‐ OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 $ 1,750,000 SIF114 (FY23) 22 215 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE THE SECTION OF FOWLER FROM HUFFINE TO OAK ‐ THIS PROJECT ALLOWS FOR EXTENSION OF FOWLER AVENUE ‐ WHICH WILL DIRECTLY INCREASE CAPACITY, AND IT ‐ EXTENDS AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH CORRIDOR ON THE ‐ WEST SIDE OF THE CITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH ‐ IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED ‐ TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF ‐ THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ‐ ON FOWLER AT HUFFINE, BABCOCK, DURSTON AND OAK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMPLETES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ON ‐ OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2024 $ 750,000 SIF114 (FY24) 23 216 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION 300,000 IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION CONTROL AT BRIDGER AND ‐ STORY MILL. ADDING ADDITIONAL PHASES AND ‐ IMPROVING GEOMETRY WILL INCREASE CAPACITY FOR ‐ DEFICIENT MOVEMENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA ‐ MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT ‐ LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS ‐ INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN ‐ THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON ‐ THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN ‐ PLACE. CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE STORY MILL, GRIFFIN TO ‐ BRIDGER DRIVE ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LOS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2021 $ 300,000 SIF116 24 217 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) ‐ CONSTRUCTION* 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE STORY MILL FROM GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER. THIS ‐ PROJECT DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ‐ ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND ‐ SIDEWALKS. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS TO STORY MILL AND BRIDGER DRIVE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ON ‐ OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ SIF117 STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2021 $ 250,000 25 218 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 15TH TO 19TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ALLOWS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE TO THE CORRIDOR ‐ AT A TIME MORE FAVORABLE TO THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 2022 $ 750,000 SIF118 26 219 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ CONSTRUCTION* 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF A 5 LANE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, PAYBACK DISTRICT, TOPS, INCREMENTAL ‐ CONSTRUCTION BY ADJACENT DEVELOPERS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY AND IMPROVE ‐ THE CONNECTIVITY OF THE CITY STREET NETWORK. IT ‐ WILL IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND PEDESTRIANS ‐ AND IMPROVE ACCESS TO THE SPORTS PARK. IT WILL ‐ FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY OCCURRING IN ‐ THIS PART OF THE CITY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ UPDATED COSTS BASED ON LATEST CONSTRUCTION COST 670,000 DATA. COSTS ASSUME A MINIMUM 1/3 PARTICIPATION BY ‐ DEVELOPER WEST OF COTTONWOOD ROAD. ‐ KAGY/SOURDOUGH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 85,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CITY SHARE OF MDT PROJECT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ MDT RECENTLY ADDED THIS INTERSECTION UPGRADE TO ‐ ITS CAPITAL PLAN AS A SAFETY UPGRADE. $85,000 IS ‐ THE CITY'S SHARE OF THAT UPGRADE. ‐ SIF138 KAGY/SOURDOUGH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2022 $ 85,000 SIF145 COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 $ 1,670,000 27 220 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ DESIGN 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EASTBOUND LANE RECONFIGURATION & SIGNAL UPGRADE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES, GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EASTBOUND LANE RECONFIGURATION & SIGNAL UPGRADE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES. GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2024 2025 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 SIF147 (FY24) SIF147 (FY25) 28 221 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH CONSTRUCTION 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 11TH TO 15TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ‐ ADDING LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES, AND SIDEWALKS. ‐ A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO ‐ LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING, & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEMS. ‐ BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH CONSTRUCTION UNSCHEDULED $ 500,000 SIF149 29 222 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT N 27TH TO A CITY COLLECTOR STREET ‐ STANDARD BETWEEN BAXTER AND CATTAIL. ‐ DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 350,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT THE INTERSECTION OF DURSTON & 27TH. ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR SIGNAL. ‐ CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT THE INTERSECITON OF DURSTON & 27TH ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR SIGNAL. ‐ HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADES TO THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHLAND AND KAGY, ‐ MOST LIKELY A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION, TO ADDRESS ‐ LEVEL OF SERVICE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION UNSCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS SIF156 $ 500,000 N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL UNSCHEDULED SIF152 DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION UNSCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS SIF153 $ 350,000 CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION UNSCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS SIF154 $ 300,000 30 223 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION 876,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REDESIGN COLLEGE, FROM 19TH TO 8TH, TO AN URBAN ‐ MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN ‐ A FAILING CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; ‐ HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME ‐ DETERIORATED TO A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO ‐ MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL PROVIDE THE DESIGN FOR A CITY STANDARD STREET ‐ SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, ‐ PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE WHICH WILL IMPROVE ‐ PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ‐ ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE AND MS4 PERMIT ‐ COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT COMPLETION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT FAILING CONFIGURATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ENHANCES SAFETY AND DRAINAGE, PRESERVES PAVEMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐ CONSTRUCTION 2025 $ 876,000 SIF158 31 224 Building Inspection 32 225 BUILDING INSPECTION FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 235,302 $ 30,472 $ 42,679 $ 55,252 $ 68,202 $ 81,541 Plus: Building Inspection Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 11,851 $ 12,207 $ 12,573 $ 12,950 $ 13,339 $ 13,739 $ ‐ Less: FY 19 Carryyforward CIP Project Costs $ (216,681) $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (357,500) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 30,472 $ 42,679 $ 55,252 $ 68,202 $ 81,541 $ 95,279 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Building Inspection Revenues $ 1,975,200 $ 1,975,200 $ 2,034,456 $ 2,095,490 $ 2,158,354 $ 2,223,105 Estimated Growth in Revenues 0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,975,200 $ 2,034,456 $ 2,095,490 $ 2,158,354 $ 2,223,105 $ 2,289,798 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 11,851 $ 12,207 $ 12,573 $ 12,950 $ 13,339 $ 13,739 Projected Projected CURRENT $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $(357,500) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 33 226 BUILDING INSPECTION FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled BI03 BUILDING INSPECTION STAFF VEHICLES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 357,500 Fiscal Year totals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 357,500 34 227 BUILDING INSPECTION FEE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The Building Inspection Fund is a special revenue fund and is supported entirely by the revenue from building fees and permits. Revenues and expenditures are statutorily restricted to amounts that support the division. This fund is dependent on construction in the City and therefore is monitored based on economic conditions. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The replacement of Building Inspection vehicles are unscheduled. $1,539,622.00 $1,843,206.44 $1,784,665.00 $1,782,769.00 $1,783,700.00 $1,746,792.49 $1,350,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,450,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,550,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $1,650,000.00 $1,700,000.00 $1,750,000.00 $1,800,000.00 $1,850,000.00 $1,900,000.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget 2019 Average FY15‐FY19 Buildng Inspection Revenue 35 228 Project Name: Year DESCRIPTION: Amount Total Project # BUILDING INSPECTION STAFF VEHICLES 357,500 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM IS FOR THE SCHEDULED REPLACEMENT OF ‐ BUILDING INSPECTION VEHICLES BASED ON AGE AND USE ‐ THE VEHICLE. VEHICLES WILL BE REPLACED ACCORDING ‐ TO THE CITY'S VEHICLE REPLACEMENT POLICY; ‐ GENERALLY, 150,000 MILES/20 YEARS BEFORE ‐ REPLACEMENT OF NON‐EMERGENCY VEHICLES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ USE VEHICLES LONGER ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ AGING VEHICLES GENERALLY REQUIRE MORE ‐ MAINTENANCE SO NEW VEHICLES SHOULD HAVE ‐ MAINTENANCE SAVINGS. ‐ BUILDING INSPECTION STAFF VEHICLES UNSCHEDULED 357,500 BI03 36 229 Community Development 37 230 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 234,769 $ 408,673 $ 177,244 $ 997 $ 108,752 $ 218,663 Plus: Long Range Planning Restricted Cash $ 165,142 Plus: Conservation Overlay Restricted Cash $ 154,565 Plus: Entryway Corridor Restricted Cash $ 50,816 Plus: Technology Restricted Cash $ 38,060 Plus: Planning Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 101,540 $ 103,571 $ 123,753 $ 107,755 $ 109,910 $ 112,109 Plus: General Fund/Other Contribution Less: FY19 Carry forward $ (301,218) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (35,000) $ (335,000) $ (300,000) $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (180,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 408,673 $ 177,244 $ 997 $ 108,752 $ 218,663 $ 330,771 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Community Development Revenues $ 1,450,574 $ 1,450,574 $ 1,479,585 $ 1,509,177 $ 1,539,361 $ 1,570,148 (Excludes interfund transfers) Estimated Growth in Revenues ‐ 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,450,574 $ 1,479,585 $ 1,509,177 $ 1,539,361 $ 1,570,148 $ 1,601,551 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 8.2% 7.0% 7.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% ‐1.2% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 7.0% 7.0% 8.2% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 101,540 $ 103,571 $ 123,753 $ 107,755 $ 109,910 $ 112,109 Projected Projected CURRENT $(335,000) $(300,000) $‐ $‐ $‐ $(180,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 38 231 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled CC01 CODE COMPLIANCE VEHCILE 35,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CD07 PROJECT TRACKING SOFTWARE UPDATE 300,000 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF277 ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 180,000 Fiscal Year totals 335,000 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 180,000 39 232 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The Community Development Fund is a special revenue fund that accounts for revenues and expenditures related to community planning and zoning operations. The Community Development Fund now has four fees that are restricted for use on long‐range and other planning document updates, and technology (Long‐Range, Conservation Overlay, Entryway Corridor, and Technology.) CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Scheduled in FY21 and FY22 isCD007 Project Tracking Software Update that was originally scheduled in just in FY22, but has been split to fund it earlier to begin implementing sooner. This software would act as the planning module for and interact with the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. There is one addition this year and that is a vehicle for the new Code Compliance Manager for FY21. Fees Restricted for Planning/Long Range Updates Average FY19 FY18 FY17 FY16 FY15 Plus: Long Range Planning Restricted Cash 165,142 103,945 245,729 245,729 179,309 51,000 Plus: Conservation Overlay Restricted Cash 154,565 106,646 228,096 228,096 198,286 11,700 Plus: Entryway Corridor Restricted Cash 50,816 61,712 61,712 61,712 61,712 7,231 Plus: Technology Restricted Cash 36,261 44,835 37,642 44,835 17,733 N/A 406,784 317,138 573,178 580,371 457,040 69,931 40 233 Project Name: Year DESCRIPTION: Amount Total Project # CODE COMPLIANCE VEHCILE 35,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CURRENTLY USING POLICE VEHICLES AND ONE IS TO BE ‐ RETURNED. THE DIVISION NEEDS ITS OWN VEHICLES ‐ SINCE A MAJOR FUNCTION OF THE DIVISION IS OUT ‐ DOING ENFORCEMENT ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ BORROW A VEHICLE FROM VARIOUS DIVISIONS EACH ‐ DAY OR FIND ANOTHER VEHICLE ON A MORE PERMANENT ‐ BASIS. ‐ ADD OPERATING: BASIC MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CENTRAL PROJECT TRACKING SOFTWARE UPDATE 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ 5% OF ALL APP. FEES ARE TO SUPPORT SOFTWARE UPGRDE ‐ CURRENT SOFTWARE WILL BE INCOMPATIBLE W/ GIS ‐ FUNCTION AND NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY SUPERION ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE (WILL BE INCOMPATIBLE) ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ GIS COMPATIBILITY AND BETTER DATA TRACKING ‐ ADDT'L OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ CENTRAL PROJECT TRACKING SOFTWARE UPDATE 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ 5% OF ALL APP. FEES ARE TO SUPPORT SOFTWARE UPGRDE ‐ CURRENT SOFTWARE WILL BE INCOMPATIBLE W/ GIS ‐ FUNCTION AND NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY SUPERION ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE (WILL BE INCOMPATIBLE) ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ GIS COMPATIBILITY AND BETTER DATA TRACKING ‐ ADDT'L OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ CC01 CD07 (FY21) 300,000 CODE COMPLIANCE VEHCILE 2021 CENTRAL PROJECT TRACKING SOFTWARE UPDATE 2021 35,000 CENTRAL PROJECT TRACKING SOFTWARE UPDATE 2022 300,000 CD07 (FY22) 41 234 ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE 180,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ POSSIBLE EXAMINATION OF CURRENT ERP SYSTEM FOR ‐ CURRENT VENDOR UPGRADE OR NEW SYSTEM ‐ ALTERNATIVE: ‐ KEEP SAME SYSTEM UNTIL UNSUPPORTED ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ USUALLY ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ FUNDING SPLIT: GF 35% PWADMIN 50% AND CD 15% ‐ ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE UNSCHEDULED $ 180,000 GF277 42 235 Fire Equipment & Capital 43 236 FIRE EQUIPMENT & CAPITAL FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 911,038 $ 64,730 $ 166,973 $ 608,718 $ 1,047,680 $ 169,339 Plus: Dedicated Tax Revenues 4 Mills $ 501,692 $ 516,743 $ 532,245 $ 548,212 $ 564,659 $ 581,599 $ ‐ Plus: Grant (Possible for FE17) $ 67,500 Less: FY19 carry forward $ (320,000) Less: Amount dedicated to BPSC $ (600,000) $ (50,000) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (428,000) $ (364,500) $ (90,500) $ (176,750) $ (1,443,000) $ (241,250) $ (1,421,300) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 64,730 $ 166,973 $ 608,718 $ 1,047,680 $ 169,339 $ 509,687 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Tax Revenues $ 501,692 $ 501,692 $ 516,743 $ 532,245 $ 548,212 $ 564,659 Estimated Annual Increase 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Total Estimated Revenues $ 501,692 $ 516,743 $ 532,245 $ 548,212 $ 564,659 $ 581,599 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 501,692 $ 516,743 $ 532,245 $ 548,212 $ 564,659 $ 581,599 Projected Projected $(364,500) $(90,500) $(176,750) $(1,443,000) $(241,250) $(1,421,300) FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED FIRE EQUIPMENT & CAPITAL REPLACEMENTS 44 237 FIRE EQUIPMENT & CAPITAL FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled FE10 SELF‐CONTAINED BREATHING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 507,000 FE12 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 39,500 40,500 41,750 43,000 44,250 242,300 FE15 CARDIAC MONITOR REPLACEMENT 175,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FE16 EXTRACTION TOOLS 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FE17 WETLANDS APPARATUS ‐ ‐ 135,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ FE18 LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ 197,000 ‐ FE20 FIRE ENGINE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,400,000 ‐ ‐ FE23 MOBILE/PORTABLE RADIOS 672,000 Fiscal Year totals 364,500 90,500 176,750 1,443,000 241,250 1,421,300 45 238 FIRE EQUIPMENT & CAPITAL FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The revenue projection in this special revenue fund is based on the value of a mill for property tax purposes. The 5‐year average change is 4.2%; the highest rate during that period was for the 2018 appraisal year. We are using a conservative 3% estimate in this CIP. This is somewhat lower than the 5‐ year average. $86,564 $89,325 $101,195 $104,321 125,423 $101,365.60 $‐ $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Average Change FY16‐FY20 Value of 1 mill, City of Bozeman 46 239 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The plan has the annual purchasing of personal protective equipment (FE12) that is purchased on a rotating cycle so that Firefighters primary gear is 0‐5 years old and their back up gear is the 6‐10 years old. FY21 includes FE15 Cardiac Monitor Replacement, which replaces the five the Department currently has and is in conjunction with the local hospital to ensure interoperability. FY23 adds a Wetland Apparatus, FE17, which will be paid for partially through grant funding. FY24 has the replacement of two fire engines both Fire Engine 1 and Fire Engine 2 will be over 12 years old and expected life span is around 10 years for the average fire engine. 47 240 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SELF‐CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS 507,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SCBA ARE WORN BY THE FIREFIGHTERS FOR RESPIRATORY PROTECTION WHEN IN IMMEDIATELY DANGEROUS TO LIFE AND HEALTH (IDLH) ENVIRONMENTS AS REQUIRED BY OSHA THE ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF A SCBA IS 10‐12 YEARS THE DEPARTMENT LAST PURCHASED SCBAS IN 2017. SCBAS REQUIRE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE BY A LICENSED THIRD PARTY. THIS PURCHASE WOULD BE FOR NEW SCBA INCLUDING FRAMES, BOTTLES, FACEPIECE, AND REGULATORS. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 39,500 DESCRIPTION: ‐ TODAY EACH MEMBER OF THE BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ‐ IS ISSUED TWO SETS OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE ‐ EQUIPMENT (PPE), A PRIMARY AND A BACKUP SET. ‐ THE NFPA AND MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES RECOMMEND ‐ THAT PPE USED BY FIREFIGHTERS, OFTEN REFERRED TO ‐ AS TURNOUT GEAR, BE REPLACED EVERY 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ HE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROTECTIVE FIBERS THAT ARE USE ‐ TO MAKE THE GEAR. PRESENTLY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ‐ PURCHASES GEAR ON A ROTATING CYCLE SO THAT A ‐ FIREFIGHTER S PRIMARY GEAR IS 0‐5 YEARS OLD AND ‐ THEIR BACK‐UP GEAR IS 6‐10 YEARS OLD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO PURCHASE OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOVES PURCHASE FROM GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO CAPITAL ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ WILL BE REPLACED IN 10 YEARS ‐ PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 2021 $ 39,500 FE12 (FY21) SELF‐CONTAINED BREATHING UNSCHEDULED $ 507,000 FE10 48 241 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 40,500 DESCRIPTION: ‐ TODAY EACH MEMBER OF THE BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ‐ IS ISSUED TWO SETS OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE ‐ EQUIPMENT (PPE), A PRIMARY AND A BACKUP SET. THE ‐ NFPA AND MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES RECOMMEND THAT ‐ PPE USED BY FIREFIGHTERS, OFTEN REFERRED TO AS ‐ TURNOUT GEAR, BE REPLACED EVERY 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROTECTIVE FIBERS THAT ARE ‐ USED TO MAKE THE GEAR. PRESENTLY THE FIRE ‐ DEPARTMENT PURCHASES GEAR ON A ROTATING CYCLE SO ‐ THAT A FIREFIGHTER S PRIMARY GEAR IS 0‐5 YEARS OLD ‐ AND THEIR BACK‐UP GEAR IS 6‐10 YEARS OLD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO PURCHASE OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOVES PURCHASE FROM GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO CAPITAL ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ WILL BE REPLACED IN 10 YEARS ‐ PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 2022 $ 40,500 FE12 FY22) 49 242 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 41,750 DESCRIPTION: ‐ TODAY EACH MEMBER OF THE BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ‐ IS ISSUED TWO SETS OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE ‐ EQUIPMENT (PPE), A PRIMARY AND A BACKUP SET. THE ‐ NFPA AND MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES RECOMMEND THAT ‐ PPE USED BY FIREFIGHTERS, OFTEN REFERRED TO AS ‐ TURNOUT GEAR, BE REPLACED EVERY 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROTECTIVE FIBERS THAT ARE ‐ USED TO MAKE THE GEAR. PRESENTLY THE FIRE ‐ DEPARTMENT PURCHASES GEAR ON A ROTATING CYCLE SO ‐ THAT A FIREFIGHTER S PRIMARY GEAR IS 0‐5 YEARS OLD ‐ AND THEIR BACK‐UP GEAR IS 6‐10 YEARS OLD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO PURCHASE OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOVES PURCHASE FROM GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO CAPITAL ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ WILL BE REPLACED IN 10 YEARS ‐ PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 2023 $ 41,750 FE12 (FY23) 50 243 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DESCRIPTION: 43,000 TODAY EACH MEMBER OF THE BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ‐ IS ISSUED TWO SETS OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE ‐ EQUIPMENT (PPE), A PRIMARY AND A BACKUP SET. ‐ THE NFPA AND MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES RECOMMEND ‐ THAT PPE USED BY FIREFIGHTERS, OFTEN REFERRED TO ‐ AS TURNOUT GEAR, BE REPLACED EVERY 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROTECTIVE FIBERS THAT ARE ‐ USED TO MAKE THE GEAR. PRESENTLY THE FIRE ‐ DEPARTMENT PURCHASES GEAR ON A ROTATING CYCLE SO ‐ THAT A FIREFIGHTERS PRIMARY GEAR IS 0‐5 YEARS OLD ‐ AND THEIR BACK‐UP GEAR IS 6‐10 YEARS OLD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE OTHER FUNDING SOURCES SUCH AS GENERAL FUND ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL REMAIN UP TO DATE AND EFFECTIVE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ DESCRIPTION: 43,000 TODAY EACH MEMBER OF THE BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ‐ IS ISSUED TWO SETS OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE ‐ EQUIPMENT (PPE), A PRIMARY AND A BACKUP SET. ‐ THE NFPA AND MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES RECOMMEND ‐ THAT PPE USED BY FIREFIGHTERS, OFTEN REFERRED TO ‐ AS TURNOUT GEAR, BE REPLACED EVERY 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROTECTIVE FIBERS THAT ARE ‐ USED TO MAKE THE GEAR. PRESENTLY THE FIRE ‐ DEPARTMENT PURCHASES GEAR ON A ROTATING CYCLE SO ‐ THAT A FIREFIGHTERS PRIMARY GEAR IS 0‐5 YEARS OLD ‐ AND THEIR BACK‐UP GEAR IS 6‐10 YEARS OLD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE OTHER FUNDING SOURCES SUCH AS GENERAL FUND ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL REMAIN UP TO DATE AND EFFECTIVE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 2025 $ 43,000 FE12 (FY25) PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 2024 $ 43,000 FE12 (FY24) 51 244 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DESCRIPTION: FY26‐FY30 242,300 TODAY EACH MEMBER OF THE BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ‐ IS ISSUED TWO SETS OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE ‐ EQUIPMENT (PPE), A PRIMARY AND A BACKUP SET. ‐ THE NFPA AND MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES RECOMMEND ‐ THAT PPE USED BY FIREFIGHTERS, OFTEN REFERRED TO ‐ AS TURNOUT GEAR, BE REPLACED EVERY 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROTECTIVE FIBERS THAT ARE ‐ USED TO MAKE THE GEAR. PRESENTLY THE FIRE ‐ DEPARTMENT PURCHASES GEAR ON A ROTATING CYCLE SO ‐ THAT A FIREFIGHTERS PRIMARY GEAR IS 0‐5 YEARS OLD ‐ AND THEIR BACK‐UP GEAR IS 6‐10 YEARS OLD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE OTHER FUNDING SOURCES SUCH AS GENERAL FUND ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL REMAIN UP TO DATE AND EFFECTIVE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ REPLACEMENT OF THE 5 CARDIAC MONTIORS CURRENTLY 175,000 IN USE BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. REPLACEMENT NEEDS ‐ TO OCCUR IN CONJUNCTION WITH UPDATES AT LOCAL ‐ HOSPITAL TO ENSURE INTEROPERABILITY. DEPARTMENT ‐ WILL RECEIVE SOME TRADE IN CREDIT FOR OLDER ‐ MONITORS. NEW MONTIORS SHOULD HAVE A 10 YEAR ‐ LIFE SPAN. ‐ PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Unscheduled $ 242,300 FE12 (Unscheduled) CARDIAC MONITOR REPLACEMENT 2021 $ 175,000 FE15 52 245 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # EXTRICATION TOOLS 130,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THESE ARE THE TOOLS THAT ARE USED TO ACCESS AND ‐ REMOVE PATIENTS FROM AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS ‐ WHEN THEY HAVE BECOME PINNED OR TRAPPED IN A ‐ VEHICLE. HAVING UP TO DATE EXTRICATION EQUIPMENT ‐ IS IMPORTANT AS AUTO MANUFACTURERS CONTINUE TO ‐ COME OUT WITH NEW METALS AND MATERIALS THAT ‐ OLDER EQUIPMENT CANNOT CUT. BY REPLACING ALL 3 ‐ OF THE UNITS AT THE SAME TIME WE STANDARDIZED ‐ OUR FLEET OF TOOLS, MAKING USE, TRAINING, AND ‐ MAINTENANCE CONSISTENT ACROSS THE BOARD. THE ‐ ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THIS EQUIPMENT IS 10YEARS ‐ ALTERNTAIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND PLAN ‐ REPLACEMENT OUT OF GENERAL FUND BUDGET. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOVES PURCHASE FROM GENERAL FUND TO CAPITAL FUND. ‐ ENSURES THAT EXTRICATION EQUIPMENT IS CONSISTENT ‐ ACROSS THE DEPARTMENT AND UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS ‐ RELATED TO AUTOMOBILE CONSTRUCTION. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE. ‐ INCREASE: 20,000 REVISED ESTIMATE WITH QUOTE FROM VENDOR ‐ EXTRICATION TOOLS 2021 $ 150,000 FE16 53 246 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WILDLAND APPARATUS 135,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE CITY OF BOZEMAN CONTINUES TO HAVE SEVERAL ‐ AREAS OF UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN ITS CORPORATE ‐ BOUNDARIES. AREAS SUCH AS STORY MILL, THE ‐ GALLATIN REGIONAL PARK, MSU AGRICULTURAL FIELDS, ‐ PETE S HILL, AND OTHERS STILL POSE A RISK OF ‐ WILDLAND FIRE PROBLEMS. HAVING A WILDLAND ‐ APPARATUS ALLOWS FOR THE BFD TO RESPOND TO THESE ‐ TYPES OF EVENTS IN A VEHICLE THAT IS EQUIPPED AND ‐ DESIGNED FOR THESE TYPES OF RESPONSES, WHICH OFTEN ‐ REQUIRE THAT WE TRAVEL OFF ROAD TO ADDRESS THE ‐ FIRE PROBLEM. THE CITY S CURRENT WILDLAND ‐ APPARATUS IS 30 YEARS OLD. WHILE THE VEHICLE MAY ‐ NOT HAVE SIGNIFICANT MILEAGE OTHER ASSESSMENTS ‐ SUCH AS STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE VEHICLE WILL ‐ NEED TO BE DONE BASED ON THE USE OF THE VEHICLE AS ‐ WELL AS AN ASSESSMENT OF THE FIRE PUMP ON THE UNIT ‐ ALTERNTAITVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING APPARATUS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DEPARTMENT WITH RELIABLE, UP TO DATE, ‐ WILDLAND APPARATUS TO ADDRESS IDENTIFIED RISK ‐ IN THE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ NEW LIGHT DUTY RESPONSE VEHICLE FOR QUICK RESPONSE 50,000 VEHICLE (QRV). VEHICLE WOULD BE USED FOR LOW ‐ PRIORITY CALL RESPONSE AND ADDITIONAL STAFFING FOR ‐ CALLS THAT REQUIRED MORE FIREFIGHTERS. NEED FOR ‐ THIS REQUEST WOULD DEPEND ON APPROVAL OF POSITIONS ‐ IN CITY STAFFING PLAN. ‐ LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES TO SUPPORT OR $ 50,000 FE18 (FY22) WILDLAND APPARATUS 2023 $ 135,000 FE17 54 247 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACEMENT OF ENGINE 1 700,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ENGINE 1 WILL BE 13 YEARS OLD AT THIS POINT ‐ THE EXPECTED LIFESPAN OF A FIRE ENGINE IS 10 YEARS ‐ FURTHER EVALUATION OF MILEAGE ENGINE HOURS, AND ‐ SERVICE AND REPAIR RECORDS WILL OCCUR AT THIS TIME ‐ TO SUPPORT OR POSTPONE THIS PURCHASE ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ AT THE TIME OR PURCHASE DELAYING WILL BE ‐ CONSIDERED. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ NEWER EQUIPMENT IS MORE COST EFFECTIVE TO MAINTAIN ‐ AND IS MORE RELIABLE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MAINTENANCE COST WOULD BE REDUCED. ‐ REPLACEMENT OF ENGINE 2 700,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ENGINE 2 WILL BE 12 YEARS OLD AT THE POINT. THE ‐ EXPECTED LIFESPAN OF A FIRE ENGINE IS 10 YEARS. ‐ FURTHER EVALUATION OF MILEAGE ENGINE HOURS, AND ‐ SERVICE AND REPAIR RECORDS WILL OCCUR AT THIS TIME ‐ TO SUPPORT OR POSTPONE THIS PURCHASE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ AT THE TIME OR PURCHASE DELAYING WILL BE ‐ CONSIDERED. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ NEWER EQUIPMENT IS MORE COST EFFECTIVE TO MAINTAIN ‐ AND IS MORE RELIABLE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MAINTENANCE COST WOULD BE REDUCED. ‐ FIRE ENGINE REPLACEMENT 2024 $ 700,000 FE20 FIRE ENGINE REPLACEMENT 2024 $ 700,000 FE21 55 248 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # MOBILE / PORTABLE RADIOS 672,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE DEPARTMENT LAST PURCHASED RADIOS IN 2017 WHEN IT TRANSITIONED OVER TO AN 800 MHZ RADIO SYSTEM. THE ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THESE RADIOS IS 10‐12 YEARS AND IS DEPENDENT ON SOFTWARE UPGRADES AND THEIR TIMING. THIS WOULD UPDATE ALL OF THE DEPARTMENTS PORTABLE RADIOS AND MOBILES RADIOS. PORTABLES ARE RADIOS THAT ARE CARRIED ON YOUR PERSON, WHERE AS MOBILES ARE MOUNTED IN RESPONSE VEHICLES. $ 672,000 FE23 MOBILE / PORTABLE RADIOS UNSCHEDULED 56 249 Fire Impact Fee 57 250 FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 2,708,198 $ 3,124,332 $ 3,552,950 $ 3,994,427 $ 4,449,147 $ 4,917,510 $ ‐ Plus: Impact Fee Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 416,134 $ 428,618 $ 441,477 $ 454,721 $ 468,362 $ 482,413 $ ‐ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (5,200,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 3,124,332 $ 3,552,950 $ 3,994,427 $ 4,449,147 $ 4,917,510 $ 5,399,923 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Fire Impact Fee Revenues $ 416,134 $ 416,134 $ 428,618 $ 441,477 $ 454,721 $ 468,362 Estimated Annual Increase 0.0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Total Estimated Revenues $ 416,134 $ 428,618 $ 441,477 $ 454,721 $ 468,362 $ 482,413 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Fire Capacity Expansion CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 416,134 $ 428,618 $ 441,477 $ 454,721 $ 468,362 $ 482,413 Projected Projected $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $(5,200,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED FIRE IMPACT FEE PROJECTS 58 251 FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled FIF06 FIRE STATION 4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,500,000 FIF07 RESPONSE APPARATUS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 700,000 Fiscal Year totals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,200,000 Current Year CIP Requests 59 252 FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND Our Fire Master Plan, which just recently has been adopted, proposed relocation of Station 1 and Station 2 to handle capacity expansion rather than build station 4. The City completed the latest impact fee study in early 2019. Below is the last five years of impact fee revenue and the average: CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Fire Station 4 and engines are unscheduled $298,000 $430,000 $348,000 $328,043 $599,365 $646,969 $470,475 $‐ $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 5‐Year Average Fire Impact Fee Revenues 60 253 Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION / EXPANSION / RELOCATION 4,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE FIRE MASTER PLAN IS COMPLETED AND ADOPTED 4/2017. ‐ THE MASTER PLAN INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF ‐ THE CITY ALONG WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEW FIRE ‐ FIRE STATIONS. FIRE STATION 1 IS BEING RELOCATED ‐ WITH THE BPSC AND THE RELOCATION OF FIRE STATION 2 ‐ IS PLANNED IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR FY23. THESE TWO ‐ RELOCATIONS CAN DELAY THE 4TH FIRE STAITION UP TO ‐ TO TEN YEARS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE ‐ ADD OPERATING ‐ THE ADDITIONAL FIRE STATION WOULD HAVE ANNUAL ‐ OPERATINF COSTS THAT INCLUDES PERSONNEL OF ‐ $1,200,000. ‐ FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE APPARATUS 700,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ FIRE STATION 4 WILL NEED RESPONSE APPARATUS ‐ THIS COULD INCLUDE RANGING FROM SUVS TO FIRE ‐ ENGINES TO LADDER TRUCKS TO HANDLE THE CITY'S ‐ EMERGENCY RESPONSE LOAD ‐ Fire Station 4 Unscheduled $ 4,500,000 FIF06 Response Apparatus Unscheduled $ 700,000 FIF07 61 254 Forestry 62 255 FORESTRY FUND (TREE MAINTENANCE) FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 342,000 $ 186,806 $ 242,708 $ 154,729 $ 147,889 $ 132,213 $ ‐ Plus: Tree Mtc Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 54,806 $ 55,902 $ 57,020 $ 58,161 $ 59,324 $ 60,510 $ ‐ Less: Carry Forward FY19 $ (120,000) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (90,000) $ ‐ $ (145,000) $ (65,000) $ (75,000) $ ‐ $ ‐ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 186,806 $ 242,708 $ 154,729 $ 147,889 $ 132,213 $ 192,724 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Tree Mtc Revenues $ 782,945 $ 782,945 $ 798,604 $ 814,576 $ 830,867 $ 847,485 Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Attributed to Annexations 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Total Estimated Revenues $ 782,945 $ 798,604 $ 814,576 $ 830,867 $ 847,485 $ 864,435 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 6.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 54,806 $ 55,902 $ 57,020 $ 58,161 $ 59,324 $ 60,510 Projected Projected CURRENT $‐ $(145,000) $(65,000) $(75,000) $‐ $‐ FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED TREE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 63 256 FORESTRY FUND (TREE MAINTENANCE) PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled FOR13 Aerial Lift/ Bucket Truck ‐ 145,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FOR16 ToolCat Utility Machine ‐ ‐ 65,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ FOR17 Forestry Brush Chipper ‐ ‐ ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ Fiscal Year totals ‐ 145,000 65,000 75,000 ‐ ‐ 64 257 FORESTRY FUND (TREE MAINTENANCE) DETAIL BACKGROUND The special revenue fund accounts for special assessment revenues levied, received, and expended for tree maintenance provided to specific property owners. This fund benefits from increases in the Tree Maintenance Assessment, which is 100% dedicated to funding the Forestry operation. In FY2018, we raised the assessment for the third larger installment of a three‐year rate plan to aid working towards the Urban Forestry Management Plan. FY2019 we raised the assessment by 5% to grow the capital reserve to aid in replacements of equipment. Without a significant increase in annexed property, we will need to increase the Tree Maintenance Assessment 1.5% each year for the next 5 years to fund this capital plan. We have estimated an annual increase of 2% that will be attributed to annexation. Over time, there will be more of an increase towards capital as we increase the reserve. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The capital plan includes three items, FOR13‐ Aerial Lift Truck FY22 and FOR16‐ ToolCat Utility Machine has been added for $65,000 in FY23, which will aid in winter snow removal and project throughout the year. FOR17‐ Forestry Brush Chipper has been added to FY24 for $75,000 and will replace the current 2005 equipment. 65 258 Year Project Name: DESCRIPTION: Amount Total Project # AERIAL LIFT / BUCKET TRUCK 145,000 DESRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE 2001 #3069 C7500 HI‐RANGER BUCKET TRUCK. ‐ THIS FORESTRY EQUIPMENT IS NEARING ITS 20 YEAR ‐ ANNIVERSARY. 11,000 MILES/4,000 HOURS. THIS TRUCK ‐ HAS BEEN THE MAIN WORKHORSE FOR THE DIVISION AND ‐ IS SHOWING ITS WEAR. REPLACEMENT WOULD GIVE US A ‐ MODERN TRUCK WITH A HIGHER WORKING HEIGHT AND NEW ‐ SAFETY ITEMS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING VEHICLE. AS DIRECTED ‐ BY THE COMMISSION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF THIS EQUIPMENT PROVIDES THE ‐ DIVISION WITH A MORE RELIABLE BUCKET TRUCK. ‐ IMPROVES OPERATOR SAFETY, LOWERS EXHAUST EMISSION ‐ AND GIVES US THE OVERALL WORKING HEIGHT WE NEED ‐ FOR THE CITY'S LARGEST TREES. SELL BY PUBLIC ‐ AUCTION THE EXISTING BUCKET TRUCK. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ FOR13 2022 Aerial Lift / Bucket Truck 145,000 66 259 Year Project Name: DESCRIPTION: Amount Total Project # TOOLCAT UTILITY MACHINE 65,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SMALL 4X4 UTILITY VEHICLE FOR FORESTRY OPERATIONS. ‐ CABBED VEHICLE OFFERS INCREASED SAFETY AND ‐ PRODUCTION FOR SNOW REMOVAL OPERATIONS. MULTIPLE ‐ ATTACHMENT OPTIONS ALLOW FOR YEAR‐ROUND ‐ VERSATILITY, INCLUDING AUGER AND BRUSH CUTTER. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE USING EXISTING ATV'S; PURCHASE NEW ATV'S ‐ AT LOWER COST THAN TOOLCAT ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SAFETY FOR CREW MEMBERS DURING SNOW REMOVAL. ‐ INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER. ‐ ADD OPERATING COST: ‐ FUEL AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ‐ FORESTRY BRUSH CHIPPER 75,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ NEW BRUSH CHIPPER FOR FORESTRY CHIPPER TRUCKS. ‐ TO REPLACE 2005 CHIPPER. NEW MODEL OFFERS GREATER ‐ CHIPPING CAPACITY, REDUCED EMISSIONS AND IMPROVED ‐ SAFETY FEATURES. WINCH LINE REDUCES WORKER FATIGUE ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE USING EXISTING EQUIPMENT; PURCHASE ‐ SMALLER NEW CHIPPER AT LOWER COST ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED PRODUCTION DURING PRUNING/REMOVAL ‐ OPERATIONS. IMPROVED WORKER CONDITIONS THROUGH ‐ SAFETY FEATURES AND WINCH LINE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COST: ‐ FUEL AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE; INITIAL WORKER ‐ ORIENTATION/TRAINING. ‐ 2024 FOR16 FOR17 65,000 75,000 ToolCat Utility Machine FORESTRY BRUSH CHIPPER 2023 67 260 General Fund 68 261 GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Balance Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 58,539 $ 227,944 $ 307,382 $ 343,415 Plus: General Fund Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,453,087 $ 1,068,069 $ 1,078,750 $ 1,089,538 $ 1,100,433 $ 1,111,437 $ ‐ Plus: GF286 ‐ Veterans Cemetery Project ‐ Reserve Used $ 40,000 $ 45,000 Plus: Bond Issue: FY23 GF306 Fire Station 2 $ 4,500,000 Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue FY24: GF056 Indoor/Outdoor Aquatics Facility $ 18,540,000 Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue: GF137 Swim Center/ GF238 Bogert $ 1,533,000 Less: Bogert Repair $ (409,507) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (1,083,580) $ (1,054,530) $ (909,345) $ (5,510,100) $ (21,137,400) $ (869,200) $ (1,913,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ 58,539 $ 227,944 $ 307,382 $ 343,415 $ 585,652 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual General Fund Revenues ** $ 33,271,206 $ 33,046,699 $ 33,377,166 $ 33,710,938 $ 34,048,047 $ 34,388,527 Estimated Growth in General Fund Revenues 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Total Estimated General Fund Revenues $ 33,271,206 $ 33,377,166 $ 33,710,938 $ 34,048,047 $ 34,388,527 $ 34,732,413 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP %* 4.4% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP* 4.4% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP** $ 1,453,087 $ 1,068,069 $ 1,078,750 $ 1,089,538 $ 1,100,433 $ 1,111,437 * Increasing percentage to reflect past adopted budgets **2020 had an additional mills for bogert that won't be there in in future ye Projected Projected CURRENT $(1,054,530) $(909,345) $(5,510,100) $(21,137,400) $(869,200) $(1,913,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED GENERAL FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 69 262 GENERAL FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled GF083 CEMETERY BACKHOE ‐ ‐ 110,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF116 CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ 52,000 ‐ ‐ GF252 CEMETERY COLUMBARIUMS ‐ 55,000 ‐ ‐ 60,000.00 ‐ GF268 SW MT VETERAN'S CEMETERY 45,000 ‐ ‐ 360,000 ‐ ‐ 45,000 55,000 110,000 412,000 60,000 ‐ GF337 HIGH DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM ‐ 25,000 ‐ ‐ 25,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF275 FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 ‐ 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 ‐ GF001 ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT‐ STIFF 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF157 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 125,000 ‐ GF272 SITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF303 CITY HALL EXPANSION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 150,000 GF323 STIFF BUILDING MAIN PARKING LOT ‐ 37,145 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF324 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 25,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF325 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 33,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF328 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ 35,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF329 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ 35,000 ‐ ‐ GF342 NEW VEHICLE‐ TOOLKAT ‐ 65,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF343 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ‐ ‐ 35,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF344 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ‐ ‐ ‐ 35,000 ‐ ‐ GF345 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 35,000 ‐ GF346 FACILTIY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 40,575 ‐ 213,000 102,145 35,000 35,000 125,000 150,000 CEMETERY Department Subtotal CITY ATTORNEY Department Subtotal ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Department Subtotal FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Department Subtotal 70 263 Project # Project Name FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled GF277 ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 420,000 GF308 FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF347 ANALYTICSNOW 28,030 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 28,030 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 420,000 GF305 FIRE STATION 2 RELOCATION ‐ ‐ 4,500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF062 PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) RE 65,000 75,000 80,000 65,000 68,000 ‐ GF080 CITY‐WIDE SWITCHES&ROUTRS 50,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 60,000 ‐ GF233 IT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ‐ 26,000 26,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF265 SERVER REPLACEMENT GF 48,000 ‐ ‐ 85,000 72,000 ‐ GF289 SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES 35,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF312 ISCI FLASH UPGRADE CHALL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF313 POLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE ‐ ‐ 40,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 198,000 156,000 201,000 205,000 200,000 ‐ GF052 UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLCMNT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 400,000 GF053 PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 183,000 183,000 126,000 126,000 192,000 640,000 GF292 MOBILE DATA EQUIP 30,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 GF293 NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES ‐ 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF294 PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL 61,000 ‐ ‐ 63,000 ‐ 128,000 GF316 POLICE BODY CAMERA SYSTEM ‐ ‐ ‐ 70,000 ‐ Department Subtotal 274,000 243,000 156,000 294,000 227,000 1,343,000 FINANCE Department Subtotal FIRE Department Subtotal INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Department Subtotal POLICE 71 264 Project # Project Name FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled GF056 AQUATICS/RECREATION CENTER 110,000 18,540,000 ‐ ‐ GF137 SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 ‐ ‐ GF140 LINDLEY PARKING LOT RESURFACING ‐ ‐ ‐ 78,400 ‐ ‐ GF205 PROST PLAN UPDATE 57,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF209 LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE ‐ ‐ 333,100 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF238 BOGERT POOL RENOVATION ‐ ‐ 533,000 ‐ ‐ GF300 SMCC GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT ‐ 126,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF301 STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT 62,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF302 PASSENGER VAN 37,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF333 SMCC GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM 120,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF334 SMCC MEETING ROOM RENOVATION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 57,200 ‐ GF336 SMCC oFFICE HVAC SYSTEM ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 160,000 ‐ GF348 REC SOFTWARE 37,200 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 276,500 163,200 443,100 20,151,400 217,200 ‐ GF245 ENERGY PROJECTS‐CH ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,054,530 909,345 5,510,100 21,137,400 869,200 1,913,000 RECREATION Department Subtotal Sustainability Department Subtotal General Fund Totals 72 265 DEPARTMENT FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled CEMETERY 45,000 55,000 110,000 412,000 60,000 ‐ CITY ATTORNEY ‐ ‐ 25,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 213,000 102,145 35,000 35,000 125,000 150,000 FINANCE 28,030 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 420,000 FIRE ‐ ‐ 4,500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 198,000 156,000 201,000 205,000 200,000 ‐ POLICE 274,000 243,000 156,000 294,000 227,000 1,343,000 RECREATION 276,500 163,200 443,100 20,151,400 217,200 ‐ SUSTAINABILITY ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTAL 1,054,530 909,345 5,510,100 21,137,400 869,200 1,913,000 Current Year CIP General Fund General Fund Overall Summary 73 266 GENERAL FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The General fund is funded through General fund revenues, which are primarily taxes. In order to continue to make the necessary improvements and equipment purchases, we need to make increased funding available for capital projects in the General Fund. We have made a 3‐pronged recommendation that will make more money available for projects. 1. Increased borrowing: The planned voter‐approved bonds, as discussed above. 2. The Park Maintenance District, if created, is funded by a separate assessment without decreasing the General Fund revenue dedicated to capital. 3. Annual General Fund Revenues available for Capital Improvements have been increased to 3% in FY20, and to 3.5% in FY21. In order to accomplish this and actually fund the capital projects listed, we will need to prioritize capital projects ahead of the growth of the other portions of the General Fund budget going forward. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Timing of voter‐based initiatives are highlighted in orange in the attached Financial Summary:  Aquatics Facility & Projects – GF056 and GF137 have been on the plan and would require a voter approved levy and bond issuance in FY22.  Fire Station #2 Relocation – GF305 was also recommended in the Fire Master Plan. Similar to Station #1, it is likely we would be selling the existing site to reduce the costs of the new station. The value of the current site is not known, but could be determined at a future date. We have also not included any amounts from the Fire Equipment and Capital Replacement Fund for this project, which we could consider. This project is planned for FY23. We have many projects that work towards our strategic plan in the General Fund plan;  The plan requests $20,000 in FY21 and then $40,000 a year for fiber optic conduit and vaults, GF275, this is an investment into broadband infrastructure taking a step towards 2.2 a Identify Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure needs.  3.1 c implement the Fire Station Location Plan‐ Fire Station 2 relocation is in this plan for FY23. 74 267  FY23.4 Active Recreation‐ There are many projects in the plan that encourage and promote active recreation such as the proposed aquatics/recreation center, GF056. The plan contains many items that aid in operations from vehicles and equipment, to information technology hardware. There are building maintenance items with a service elevator in the Stiff Professional Building and the expansion of areas in City Hall. 75 268 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # CEMETERY BACKHOE 110,000 THIS PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WOULD REPLACE CURRENT ‐ BACKHOE (2001 MODEL WITH 3295 HOURS) THIS PIECE OF ‐ EQUIPMENT IS USED FOR BURIALS 2 TO 3 TIMES PER ‐ WEEK‐ THIS IS THE MAIN AND MOST IMPORTANT PIECE OF ‐ EQUIPMENT UTILIZED IN THE CEMTERY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO UTILIZE EXISTING BACHOE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREADED RELIABILITY AND STAFF SAFETY ‐ OPERATING COSTS: DECREASE WITH NEW MACHINERY ‐ CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT 52,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ VEHICLE REPLACMENT OF 2001 1 TON DODGE 53,000 MI ‐ VEHICLE USED FOR BURIALS, HAULING MATERIAL AND ‐ WINTER TIME SNOW PLOWING ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP USING AND REPAIRING THE OLDER EQUIPMENT ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL ‐ CEMETERY COLUMBARIUM 55,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ADDING AN ADDITIONAL EIGHTY NICHE EACH COLUMBARIUM ‐ THE COLUMBARIUM WOULD BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE SAME ‐ AREA AS THE EXISTING COLUMBARIUMS. CURRENTLY, THE ‐ SECOND COLUMBARIUM IS FULL. THIRD COLUMBARIUM ‐ IS IN OPERATION AND POPULAR ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT ADD ANY COLUMBARIUMS TO THE CEMETERY AND ‐ CEASE OR PUT ON HOLD THE PROGRAM ONCE THE ‐ THIRD COLUMBARIUM IS FULL. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CONTINUATION ON A LONG STANDING CEMETERY SERVICE, ‐ ALONG WITH EASE AND MINIMAL MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL IF ANY ‐ CEMETERY CEMETERY COLUMBARIUMS 2022 $ 55,000 GF252 (FY21) CEMETERY CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT 2024 $ 52,000 GF116 CEMETERY CEMETERY BACKHOE 2023 $ 110,000 GF083 76 269 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # CEMETERY COLUMBARIUM 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ADDING AN ADDITIONAL EIGHTY NICHE EACH COLUMBARIUM ‐ THE COLUMBARIUM WOULD BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE SAME ‐ AREA AS THE EXISTING COLUMBARIUMS. CURRENTLY, THE ‐ SECOND COLUMBARIUM IS FULL. THIRD COLUMBARIUM ‐ IS IN OPERATION AND POPULAR ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT ADD ANY COLUMBARIUMS TO THE CEMETERY AND ‐ CEASE OR PUT ON HOLD THE PROGRAM ONCE THE ‐ THIRD COLUMBARIUM IS FULL. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CONTINUATION ON A LONG STANDING CEMETERY SERVICE, ‐ ALONG WITH EASE AND MINIMAL MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL IF ANY ‐ SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY ‐ DESCRIPTION: PHASE 3 COLUMBARIUM. 45,000 FIRST PHASE OF THE SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S ‐ CEMETERY WHICH INCLUDES DESIGN, EARTH WORK, ‐ SIDEWALKS AND RETAINING WALLS TO FORM THE ‐ 'BACKBONE' FOR THE VETERAN GROUP TO START ‐ FUNDRAISING. PHASE TWO POTENTIALLY COULD BE THE ‐ 5500 SQUARE FOOT STAMPED CONCRETE PLAZA AND PHASE ‐ THREE COULD BE THE INSTALLATION OF THE FIRST ‐ COLUMBARIUM. PHASES 2 AND 3 POTENTIALLY BE FUNDED ‐ WITH A 50% MATCH FROM THE VETERAN'S GROUP FOR THE ‐ CONCRETE AND THE FIRST COLUMBARIUM. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ REDUCE THE CITY'S CAPITAL INPUT AND RELY ON THE ‐ VARIOUS VETERAN GROUPS FOR THE FUNDING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ A TRUE VETERAN'S CEMETERY WILL HELP THE VETERAN'S ‐ REALIZE THEIR BENEFITS UPON THEIR DEATH. CURRENTLY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS:MINIMAL ‐ FUTURE PHASING MIGHT BE REQUIRED, DEPENDING ON THE ‐ FUNDRAISING CAPABILITIES OF THE VARIOUS VETERAN ‐ GROUP IN SOUTHWEST MONTANA. ‐ CEMETERY SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY 2021 $ 45,000 GF268 (FY21) CEMETERY CEMETERY COLUMBARIUMS 2025 $ 60,000 GF252 (FY25) 77 270 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY‐ CONT'D ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONTINUING ITEM/ASSETS ADDED TO VETERAN'S CEMETERY ‐ COMMITTAL SHELTER 360,000 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NO SHELTER FROM THE WEATHER ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT FOR MEMORIAL SERVICES ‐ OPERATIONAL COSTS: MINIMAL CUSTODIAL WORK ‐ CEMETERY SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY 2024 $ 360,000 GF268 (FY24) 78 271 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # HIGH DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM 22,085 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE REQUESTS REPLACEMENT OF ‐ THE CURRENT LOW‐DENSITY SHELVING AND STORAGE AREA ‐ WITHIN THE CITY ATTORNEYS SUITE WITH A HIGH ‐ DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM. THE CURRENT METHOD OF ‐ STORING ARCHIVED CRIMINAL FILES IS NOT EFFICIENT, ‐ SAFE NOR IS IT AN OPTIMAL USE OF SPACE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE HAS CIVIL ‐ FILES STORED IN A STORAGE AREA ADJACENT TO THE ‐ ADMINISTRATIONS SUITE IN CITY HALL. ‐ THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 2ND FLOOR OF CITY HALL ‐ WILL MOST LIKELY NEVER BE USED FOR OFFICE SPACE. ‐ THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A NEED FOR HIGH DENSITY FILE ‐ STORAGE IN CITY HALL WHETHER IT BE FROM THE CIVIL ‐ FUNCTION OF THE CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE OR OTHER ‐ DEPARTMENTS WITHIN CITY HALL. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WE INTEND TO PURCHASE A HEAVY DUTY SCANNER ($900) ‐ AND HIRE A TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE TO SCAN A PORTION ‐ OF THE EXISTING CRIMINAL FILES INTO THE JUSTWARE ‐ FILE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. THERE ARE CURRENTLY ‐ OVER 15,000 FILES, WHICH WOULD NEED SCANNING. IF A ‐ TEMP COULD SCAN SIX FILES AN HOUR, IT WOULD TAKE ‐ 2500 HOURS TO COMPLETE THIS TASK. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE HIGH DENSITY STORAGE SYSTEM WILL MAXIMIZE ‐ STORAGE IN AN 11 BY 23 WINDOWLESS ROOM. ‐ THE NEW STORAGE SYSTEM WILL ALLOW STAFF TO FILE ‐ AND LOCATE FILES MORE QUICKLY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ $20,800 TEMP STAFF AND SUPPLIES WILL BE ONE TIM ‐ INCREASE IN COST ESTIMATE 2,915.00 HIGH DENSITY STORAGE 2023 $ 25,000 GF337 CITY ATTORNEY 79 272 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE ‐ INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDRED: ‐ DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐ AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT ‐ POLICY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION ‐ FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE ‐ INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDRED: ‐ DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐ AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT ‐ POLICY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION ‐ INCREASE 20,000 FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE ‐ INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT ‐ ALTRNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐ AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT ‐ POLICY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION ‐ DECREASE (10,000) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 2023 $ 40,000 GF275 (FY23) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 2022 $ 40,000 GF275 (FY22) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 2022 $ 20,000 GF275 (FY21) Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE ‐ INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT. ‐ ADVANTGAES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐ AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT ‐ POLICY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. INCREASE 15,000 FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE ‐ INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT. ‐ ADVANTGAES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐ AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT ‐ POLICY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. ‐ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 2025 $ 40,000 GF275 (FY25) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 2024 $ 40,000 GF275 (FY24) 81 274 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT ‐ STIFF 125,000 DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF ORIGINAL (1972) ‐ ELEVATOR DUE TO FAILING MAIN HYDRAULIC VALVE. ‐ MOVING ALL PUBLIC TRAFFIC TO THE SECOND FLOOR ‐ WITH UPCOMING REMODEL WILL INCREASE USE AND ‐ DEMAND. THE ELEVATOR IS INSPECTED ANNUALLY ‐ AND IS STILL SAFE ALTHOUGH UNRELIABLE WITH ‐ MULTIPLE OUTAGES OVER THE PAST YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NONE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: IMPROVED STABILITY ‐ FOR CRITICAL BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ WILL NOT INCREASE OVER CURRENT OPERATING BUDGET. ‐ REPLACEMENT COST ADJUSTED (FROM $74,400) TO ‐ INCLUDE CAR MODERNIZATION AND CODE UPDATES ‐ FOR ELECTRICAL AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS. ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT ‐ STIFF 2021 $ 125,000 GF001 82 275 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR 74,700 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF ORIGINAL (1980) ELEVATOR DUE TO ‐ END OF ACCEPTABLE LIFESPAN. MANY IMPROVEMENTS ‐ HAVE BEEN MADE IN ELEVATOR TECHNOLOGY RESULTING ‐ IN IMPROVED SERVICE AND ENERGY SAVINGS. WHILE THE ‐ ELEVATOR IS INSPECTED ANNUALLY AND IS SAFE, IT IS ‐ USED HEAVILY BY MEMBERS OF THE SENIOR CENTER WITH ‐ COMPROMISED MOBILITY CHOICES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN AND ADJUST THE ‐ ELVATOR OPERATING SYSTEMS AS NEEDED. WAIT TO ‐ REPLACE THE ELEVATOR UNTIL IT PHYSICALLY BREAKS ‐ DOWN OR CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE OPERATION ‐ AND HOLD OFF ON THE REPLACEMENT UNTIL THE ‐ ROUTINE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS EXCEED ‐ ACCEPTABLE LIMITS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVED OPERATIONS AND REDUCED MAINTENANCE FOR ‐ THE ELEVATOR MOST NEEDED BY A SPECIAL POPULATION. ‐ SMALL REDUCTION IN ANNUAL ENERGY COSTS ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS WILL NOT ‐ INCREASE OVER CURRENT OPERATING BUDGET. 50,300 REPLACEMENT COST ADJUSTED (FROM $74,700) TO ‐ TO INCLUDE CAR MODERNIZATION AND CODE UPDATES ‐ FOR ELECTRICAL AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS. ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR 2025 $ 125,000 GF157 83 276 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ OVER THE LAST THREE FISCAL YEARS THIS PROJECT HAS ‐ HAS CHANGED OUT 33 OLD STYLE KEYLESS ENTRY LOCKS ‐ WITH THE NEW WIRELESS UNIT. IN ORDER COMPLETE ‐ THIS PROJECT AND UPDATE THE ENTIRE CITY TO ‐ WIRELESS IT WILL REQUIRE THE REPLACEMENT OF ‐ THE LAST 13 UNITS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO OPERATE IN SAME MANNER ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOVING TO A WIRELESS SYSTEM MEANS ALL UPDATES CAN ‐ BE PERFORMED USING THE CITY WIDE NETWORK. ‐ THE ADVANTAGES TO THIS SYSTEM IS BETTER ‐ UTILIZATION OF STAFF HOURS BY REDUCING THE ‐ REQUIRED MAN HOURS WHEN PERFORMING MANUAL ‐ UPDATES ON‐BOARDING AND OFF‐BOARDING STAFF. ‐ BASED ON THE ACCESS LEVEL REQUESTED FOR A STAFF ‐ MEMBER, IT COULD MEAN ACCESSING 50 INDIVIDUAL ‐ LOCKS FOR A SINGLE ACCESS CHANGE REQUEST. ‐ CITY HALL EXPANSION REMODEL OF STORAGE AREAS INTO 150,000 OFFICES. ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ WITH THE ADDITIONAL PLANNED FTE AS THE CITY GROWS ‐ CITY HALL'S CURRENT STORAGE AREAS CAN BE REMODELED ‐ INTO OFFICE SPACES. THE SPACE COULD POTENTIALLY ‐ PROVIDE 2‐3 OFFICES SPACES DOWNSTAIRS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ANY ADDITIONAL FTE IN ANY OF THE DEPARTMENT IN ‐ CITY HALL DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE SPACE. THIS ‐ WOULD PROVIDE SPACE THAT IS PERMENANT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING. ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT CITY HALL EXPANSION REMODEL OF STORAGE AREAS INTO OFFICES UNSCHEDULED $ 150,000 GF303 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD 2021 $ 30,000 GF272 84 277 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING MAIN PARKING LOT 37,145 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CURRENT FRONT PARKINIG LOT HAS EXCEEDED IT'S LIFE ‐ CYCLE AND REQUIRES RESURFACING. POT HOLES AND ‐ CRACKS ARE INCREASING YEARLY THAT REQUIRE REPAIR. ‐ MILL EXISTING ASPHALT AND DISPOSE OFF SITE, ‐ INSTALL 2 INCH ASPHALT. PAINT LINE STRIPS AND ‐ ACCESSIBLE SPACES WITH LATEX TRAFFIC PAINT. ‐ DESCRIPTION: PER THE CURRENT STAFFING PLAN THE 25,000 THE FACILITIES DEPARTMENT IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE ‐ BY ONE IN A PROJECT COORDINATOR. NEW ‐ VEHICLE WILL BE NEEDED TO SUPPORT OPERATIONAL ‐ SUPPORT OF CITY OPERATIONS. REQUIREMENTS ‐ WILL BE A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE OR ALL WHEEL DRIVE OR ‐ CAPABILITIES FOR DRIVING IN TYPE OF WEATHER ‐ CONDITIONS. ‐ CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES: NONE ‐ OPERATING COST: FUEL AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE ‐ COSTS $1000 ‐ CHANGES: DECREASE AMOUNT BY $10,000 FROM $35,000 ‐ TO $25,000 TO REFLECT THIS POSITIONS REQUIREMENTS. ‐ DESCRIPTION: PER THE CURRENT STAFFING PLAN THE 33,000 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE ‐ BY ONE SERVICE WORKER. NEW VEHICLE WILL BE ‐ NEEDED TO SUPPORT OPERATIONAL SUPPORT OF ‐ CITY OPERATIONS. REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR ‐ WHEEL DRIVE FULL SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT ‐ DEPARTMENT DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS TO INCLUDE ‐ HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING TRAILERS, AND CAN ‐ PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS. ‐ TRUCK BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE INCLUDED ‐ IN THIS PURCHASE. BASE VEHICLE PRICE IS $31,000 ‐ SHELL & LINER $4,000 ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED; NONE ‐ ADDED OPERATING COSTS: FUELS AND GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COST $1000 ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 2021 $ 33,000 GF325 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 2021 $ 25,000 GF324 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING MAIN PARKING LOT 2022 $ 37,145 GF323 85 278 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSET # 2756 IS 23YRS OLD ‐ AND IS REACHING THE END OF IT'S LIFECYCLE AND ‐ SHOULD BE REPLACED. BODY CONTINUES TO GET ‐ ADDITIONAL RUST EACH YEAR. REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ‐ A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FULL SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO ‐ SUPPORT DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS SUCH AS HAULING ‐ MATERIALS, PULLING TRAILERS, AND CAN PERFORM IN ‐ ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS. BED SHELL AND LINER WILL ‐ BE INCLUDED ON THIS PURCHASE. BASE VEHICLE PRICE ‐ IS $31,000. SHELL & LINER $4,000 35,000 DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSET # 2971 IS 23YRS OLD ‐ AND IS REACHING THE END OF IT'S LIFECYCLE AND ‐ SHOULD BE REPLACED. ‐ CURRENT VEHICLE IS TOO SMALL TO SAFELY TOW ‐ REQUIRED DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT. ‐ REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FULL ‐ SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT DEPARTMENT ‐ OPERATIONS SUCH AS HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING ‐ TRAILERS, AND CAN PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER ‐ CONDITIONS. BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE INCLUDED ‐ ON THIS PURCHASE. ‐ BASE VEHICLE PRICE IS $31,000 ‐ SHELL & LINER $4,000 35,000 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2024 $ 35,000 GF329 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2023 $ 35,000 GF328 86 279 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DESCRIPTION: 65,000 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ‐ TO MAINTAIN THE ORGANIZATIONS FACILITIES AND ‐ THE GROUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR FACILITIES. THE ‐ DEPARTMENT HAS LIMITED EQUIPMENT TO HELP ‐ SUPPORT THESE RESPONSIBILITIES, AS THE CITY GROWS ‐ AND THE FACILITIES DEPARTMENT TAKES ON MORE ‐ RESPONSIBILITIES WITH OUR ASSETS IT WILL REQUIRE ‐ ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT TO PERFORM OUR JOB ‐ REQUIREMENTS. THIS PIECE OF EQUIPMENT HAS THE ‐ ABILITY TO PROVIDE A MOBIL OPERATIONS FOR OUR ‐ SPRING POWER WASHING OPERATIONS, WINTER SNOW ‐ REMOVAL OPERATIONS AND GENERAL DUTY TRANSPORTING ‐ OF EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS. EQUIPMENT OF THIS TYPE ‐ HAS NUMEROUS ATTACHMENTS THAT CAN BE USED FOR ‐ DIFFERENT OPERATIONS, SAME EQUIPMENT USED BY THE ‐ STREETS AND PARKS DEPARTMENTS. ONCE THE NEW ‐ PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING COMES ON LINE THIS TYPE OF ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL BE VITAL TO HELPING SUPPORT THIS ‐ FACILITY. ‐ CONSIDERED ALTERNATIVES: CONTINUE TO OPERATE USING ‐ PHYSICAL LABOR AND CONTRACTORS IN PLACE OF HAVING ‐ THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT FOR THE JOB, THIS COULD LEAD ‐ TO POSSIBLE STAFF INJURIES AND INCREASE COST TO ‐ THE CITY ‐ ADVANTAGES; ‐ BRING THE CITY'S FACILITIES DEPARTMENT IN ALIGNMEN ‐ WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION AND ‐ WORK MORE EFFICIENTLY. ‐ COST; MAINTENANCE $1000 PER YEAR, LIGHT PACKAGE ‐ $1700 ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT NEW VEHICLE ‐ TOOLKAT 2022 $ 65,000 GF342 87 280 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DESCRIPTION: PER THE CURRENT STAFFING PLAN THE 35,000 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE ‐ BY ONE SERVICE WORKER. NEW VEHICLE WILL BE ‐ NEEDED TO SUPPORT OPERATIONAL SUPPORT OF ‐ CITY OPERATIONS. REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR ‐ WHEEL DRIVE FULL SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT ‐ DEPARTMENT DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS TO INCLUDE ‐ HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING TRAILERS, AND CAN ‐ PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS. ‐ TRUCK BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE INCLUDED ‐ IN THIS PURCHASE. BASE VEHICLE PRICE IS $31,000 ‐ SHELL & LINER $4,000 ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED; NONE ‐ ADDED OPERATING COSTS: FUELS AND GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COST $1000 ‐ DESCRIPTION: PER THE CURRENT STAFFING PLAN THE 35,000 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE ‐ BY ONE SERVICE WORKER. NEW VEHICLE WILL BE ‐ NEEDED TO SUPPORT OPERATIONAL SUPPORT OF ‐ CITY OPERATIONS. REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR ‐ WHEEL DRIVE FULL SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT ‐ DEPARTMENT DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS TO INCLUDE ‐ HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING TRAILERS, AND CAN ‐ PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS. ‐ TRUCK BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE INCLUDED ‐ IN THIS PURCHASE. BASE VEHICLE PRICE IS $31,000 ‐ SHELL & LINER $4,000 ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED; NONE ‐ ADDED OPERATING COSTS: FUELS AND GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COST $1000 ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 2024 $ 35,000 GF344 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 2023 $ 35,000 GF343 88 281 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSET # 3079 IS 23YRS OLD 35,000 AND IS REACHING THE END OF IT'S LIFECYCLE AND ‐ SHOULD BE REPLACED. ‐ CURRENT VEHICLE IS TOO SMALL TO SAFELY TOW ‐ REQUIRED DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT. ‐ REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FULL ‐ SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT DEPARTMENT ‐ OPERATIONS SUCH AS HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING ‐ TRAILERS, AND CAN PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER ‐ CONDITIONS. BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE INCLUDED ‐ ON THIS PURCHASE. ‐ BASE VEHICLE PRICE IS $31,000 ‐ SHELL & LINER $4,000 ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 40,575 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE 600,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ POSSIBLE EXAMINATION OF CURRENT ERP SYSTEM FOR ‐ CURRENT VENDOR UPGRADE OR NEW SYSTEM ‐ ALTERNATIVE: ‐ KEEP SAME SYSTEM UNTIL UNSUPPORTED ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ USUALLY ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ FINANCE ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE UNSCHEDULED $ 600,000 GF277 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 $ 40,575 GF346 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2025 $ 35,000 GF345 89 282 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL‐ CASHIER WINDOW 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ TO BETTER USE THE SPACE IN FINANCE AND TO INCREASE ‐ SAFETY AND SECURITY. THE FRONT DESK WILL MOVE TO ‐ BE A WINDOW OPERATION KEEPING A BARRIER BETWEEN ‐ CUSTOMERS AND CASH. IN ADDITION, USE SPACE NOT ‐ UTILIZED AND ADD AN ADDITIONAL CUBE ROW. ‐ ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED: ‐ FIND OTHER LOCATIONS FOR STAFF TO SIT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ BETTER USE OF SPACE AND ACCOMADATE STAFFING ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE UPDATED COST ESTIMATE ALSO INCLUDE EXTRA WORKSPACE 15,000 ANALYTICSNOW‐ ERP SYSTEM REPORTING SOFTWARE 28,030 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WEB‐BASED REPORTING AUTHORING TOOL USED TO BUILD ‐ SOPHISTICATED, MULTI‐PAGE, MULTI‐QUERY REPORTS ‐ USING DATA FROM OUR ERP SYSTEM. CURRENT REPORTING TOOL IS NO LONGER SUPPORTED AND CERTAIN ACCOUNTING AND PAYROLL PROCESSES RELY HEAVILY ON THE UNSUPPORTED TOOL. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: USE A LESS EXPENSIVE TOOL NOT CONNECTED TO THE ERP SYSTEM BUT THIS WILL NEED MAJOR STAFF TIME TO ‐ SETUP. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL MAINTENANCE $3,300 ‐ THIS IS SOMETHING WILL BE SPLIT FUNDING WISE ‐ AMONG ALL FUNDS THAT USE THE SYSTEM INCLUDING ‐ ENTERPRISE FUNDS ‐ FINANCE ANALYTICSNOW‐ ERP SYSTEM REPORTING SOFTWARE 2021 $ 28,030 GF347 FINANCE FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL‐ CASHIER WINDOW 2022 $ 75,000 GF308 90 283 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIRE STATION 2‐ RELOCATION 4,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ FIRE STATION 2, LOCATED AT 410 S. 19TH AVE, IS A ‐ 1‐STORY BUILDING THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1974 TO ‐ SERVE AS THE WEST END FIRE STATION FOR THE CITY OF ‐ CITY OF BOZEMAN. DUE TO GROWTH OF THE CITY, THIS ‐ STATION NOW PRIMARILY SERVES WHAT IS THE SOUTH ‐ SIDE AND CENTRAL PARTS OF THE CITY. THE STATION ‐ SERVES AS THE PRIMARY RESPONSE STATION FOR ALL ‐ AREAS WEST OF N. 7TH AVE TO THE CITY LIMITS THAT ‐ ARE SOUTH OF DURSTON AVE. THIS STATION IS THE ‐ PRIMARY RESPONSE STATION FOR ALL OF MSU CAMPUS AND ‐ BOZEMAN HIGH SCHOOL AND IS THE SECONDARY ‐ RESPONSE TO AREAS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE. GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS HAVE BEEN THE MAJORITY ‐ OF WORK COMPLETED ON THIS STATION SINCE IT S ‐ OPENING. IN SEPTEMBER 2017 THE FIRE MASTER PLAN ‐ UPDATE WAS PRESENTED WITH THE RECOMMENDATION ‐ TO RELOCATE FIRE STATION 2 SOMEWHERE ON MSU ‐ CAMPUS TO IMPROVE RESPONSE CAPABILITIES. THIS ‐ WOULD REQUIRE A PARTNERSHIP WITH MSU BUT COULD ‐ HAVE MULTIPLE BENEFITS FROM AN EMERGENCY PLANNING ‐ STANDPOINT. IF A PLAN WERE TO BE DEVELOPED FOR ‐ RELOCATING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TRAINING FACILITY ‐ TO THE SAME SITE, AN ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION ‐ FROM THE RECENT FIRE MASTER PLAN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ AS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMISSION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ADDRESSES HEALTH AND SAFETY, SPACE, AND LONG TERM ‐ NEEDS OF FIRE STATION 2 FOR THE NEXT 25‐30 YEARS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ GENERAL OPERATING COST ‐ PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 65,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 2021 $ 65,000 FIRE FIRE STATION 2 ‐ RELOCATION 2023 $ 4,500,000 GF305 91 284 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF ‐ PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED ‐ JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL ‐ REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS ‐ OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR ‐ ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS ‐ ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS ‐ (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE ‐ MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND ‐ REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR ‐ NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE ‐ IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY ‐ SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 75,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF ‐ PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED ‐ JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL ‐ REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS ‐ OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR ‐ ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS ‐ ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS ‐ (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE ‐ MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND ‐ REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR ‐ NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE ‐ IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY ‐ SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ GF062 (FY21) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 2022 $ 75,000 GF062 (FY22) 92 285 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF ‐ PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED ‐ JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL ‐ REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS ‐ OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR ‐ ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS ‐ ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS ‐ (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE ‐ MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND ‐ REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR ‐ NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE ‐ IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY ‐ SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NEED TO UP THIS BY 20K 20,000 PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 65,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF ‐ PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED ‐ JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL ‐ REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS ‐ OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR ‐ ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS ‐ ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS ‐ (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE ‐ MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND ‐ REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR ‐ NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC. ‐ ALTERNATIVES OF CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE ‐ IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY ‐ SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS. ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 2024 $ 65,000 GF062 (FY24) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 2023 $ 80,000 GF062 (FY23) 93 286 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 68,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF ‐ PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED ‐ JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL ‐ REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS ‐ OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR ‐ ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS ‐ ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT REPLACE COMPUTER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE ‐ IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY ‐ SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP 45,000 REPLACEMENT ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES ‐ AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL, ‐ PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J, ‐ LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK, ‐ CEMETERY. ‐ THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐ NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ‐ PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM ‐ "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES ‐ RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND ‐ VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06). ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐ OR MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS ‐ THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS ‐ WELL AS DATA. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UP THIS BY 5K 5,000 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS 2021 $ 50,000 GF080 (FY21) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT 2025 $ 68,000 GF062 (FY25) 94 287 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP 55,000 REPLACEMENT ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES ‐ AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL, ‐ PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J, ‐ LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK, ‐ CEMETERY. SMALLER SITES WILL BE CONSOLIDATED IN ‐ ONE YEAR. FY 15 ‐ PROF‐BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINT. ‐ THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐ NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ‐ PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM ‐ "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES ‐ RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND ‐ VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06). ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐ OR MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS ‐ THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS ‐ WELL AS DATA. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS 2022 $ 55,000 GF080 (FY22) 95 288 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP 50,000 REPLACEMENT ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES ‐ AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL, ‐ PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J, ‐ LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK, ‐ CEMETERY. SMALLER SITES WILL BE CONSOLIDATED IN ‐ ONE YEAR. FY 15 ‐ PROF‐BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINT. ‐ THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐ NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ‐ PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM ‐ "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES ‐ RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND ‐ VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06). ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐ OR MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS ‐ THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS ‐ WELL AS DATA. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ADD 5K 5,000 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS 2023 $ 55,000 GF080 (FY23) 96 289 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP 55,000 REPLACEMENT ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES ‐ AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL, ‐ PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J, ‐ LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK, ‐ CEMETERY. ‐ THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐ NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ‐ PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM ‐ "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES ‐ RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND ‐ VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06). ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐ OR MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS ‐ THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS ‐ WELL AS DATA. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP 55,000 REPLACEMENT ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES ‐ AND ROUTERS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THIS ‐ EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOGY ‐ NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ‐ PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM ‐ "UPTIME" AND WORKLOAD MEASURES ‐ RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND ‐ VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE". ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐ OR MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS ‐ THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES ‐ AS WELL AS DATA. ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS 2025 $ 55,000 GF080 (FY25) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS 2024 $ 55,000 GF080 (FY24) 97 290 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # VEHICLE REPLACEMENTDESCRIPTION:REPLACEMENT OF IT V 26,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF IT VEHICLES. IF OUR CURRENT ‐ VEHICLE IS STILL RUNNING WELL AND MAINTENANCE ‐ COSTS ARE NOT HIGH, WE WOULD KEEP THEM BEYOND ‐ WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. THE TRUCK WE WOULD REPLACE ‐ WOULD BE THE 1995 DODGE TRUCK WITH 68K ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUY NEW OR DO NOTHING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDE FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORTATION WITH REDUCED ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL ‐ VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 23,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF IT VEHICLES. IF OUR CURRENT ‐ VEHICLE IS STILL RUNNING WELL AND MAINTENANCE ‐ COSTS ARE NOT HIGH, WE WOULD KEEP THEM BEYOND ‐ WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. 2005 CHEVY COLORADO WITH ‐ 38K 1999 DODGE TRUCK WITH 107K 1999 JEEP ‐ CHEROKEE WITH 74K 1995 DODGE TRUCK WITH 67K ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUY NEW OR DO NOTHING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDE FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORTATION WITH REDUCED ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL ‐ PER JOHN VANDELINDER NEED TO UP THIS TO 26K 3,000 GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENT 48,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICAL SERVERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ VIRTUALIZE IF POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF BUYING PHYSICAL ‐ SEVERS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ KEEP OUR SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER WARRANTY ‐ AND IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR REQUIRED ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVER REPLACEMENT GF 2021 $ 48,000 GF265 (FY21) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2023 $ 26,000 GF233 (FY23) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2022 $ 26,000 GF233 (FY22) 98 291 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENT 85,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICAL SERVERS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ VIRTUALIZE IF POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF BUYING PHYSICAL ‐ SERVERS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ KEEP OUR SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER WARRANTY ‐ AND IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR REQUIRED ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENT 72,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICAL SERVERS ‐ ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED: ‐ VIRTUALIZE IF POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF BUYING PHYSICAL ‐ SERVERS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ KEEP OUR SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER WARRANTY ‐ AND IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR REQUIRED ‐ PERFORMANCE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES 10,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADING OUR VM FARM AND SQL CLUSTER TO THE ‐ NEWEST VERSIONS FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE ‐ COMPATIBILITY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STAY ON OUR CURRENT VERSIONS UNTIL FORCED TO ‐ UPGRADE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ WILL KEEP THE CITY CURRENT WITH SUPPORTED VERSIONS ‐ OF THE OPERATING SYSTEMS AND WILL ALLOW US TO ‐ SUPPORT SOFTWARE THAT REQUIRES THE NEWER ‐ VERSIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ WANT TO MOVE 25K FROM FY23 TO FY21 25,000 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES 2021 $ 35,000 GF289 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVER REPLACEMENT GF 2025 $ 72,000 GF265 (FY25) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVER REPLACEMENT GF 2024 $ 85,000 GF265 (FY24) 99 292 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # POLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE AND BACKUP 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WE ARE CURRENTLY GENERATING AROUND 1 TERABYTE ‐ OF DATA PER MONTH WITH THE IN CAR VIDEO SYSTEMS ‐ AND WILL BE OUT OF SPACE FOR STORAGE IN THE NEXT ‐ 12‐18 MONTHS. IT IS CRITICAL INFORMATION THAT ‐ GROWS RAPIDLY. WE ARE TRYING TO GET AHEAD OF THE ‐ GROWTH BY PURCHASING A 5 YEAR SOLUTION OUT OF THE ‐ GATE THAT CAN BE EXPANDED AS NEEDED INTO THE ‐ FUTURE FOR GROWTH AND THE POSSIBILITY OF BODY ‐ CAMERAS. THE FY 22 AMOUNT RELATES TO THE ‐ INCREASED STORAGE NEEDED RELATED TO BODY ‐ CAMERA FILES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ WILL ALLOW US TO CONTINUE TO SAFELY STORE, ACCESS ‐ AND BACKUP CRUCIAL EVIDENTIARY DATA WITHOUT ‐ CONCERN OF RUNNING OUT OF STORAGE SPACE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE AND BACKUP 2023 $ 40,000 GF313 100 293 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS: 400,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE DEPARTMENT UTILIZES A VARIETY OF UNMARKED ‐ VEHICLES FOR DETECTIVES, SUPPORT SERVICES, ‐ ADMINISTRATION, SPECIALTY ASSIGNMENTS AND ‐ SPECIALTY UNITS. INDIVIDUALLY, MOST VEHICLES ARE ‐ BELOW THE CIP THRESHOLD, BUT THE VALUE OF EACH ‐ VEHICLE VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY. AS OF FY21, THE ‐ MAJORITY OF THESE VEHICLES WILL BE PURCHASED ‐ OUT OF THE DEPARTMENT'S GENERAL FUND WHEN ‐ NEEDED. ‐ ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE UTILIZING THE EXISTING VEHICLES, SOME OF ‐ WHICH BECOME UNSAFE AND UNUSABLE EVEN FOR ROUTINE ‐ DRIVING, ESPECIALLY OUT OF THE CITY LIMITS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS ON THESE VEHICLES ARE RELATIVELY ‐ LOW, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THEY ARE TYPICALLY ‐ ASSIGNED TO ONE STAFF MEMBER AND ARE NOT ‐ ROUTINELY DRIVEN AS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES. ‐ OUR STANDARDIZED FLEET OF SIMILAR VEHICLES (CHEV ‐ IMPALAS AND MALIBUS) HAVE KEPT COSTS LOW, WITH ‐ IN HOUSE STAFF CONDUCTING MANY OF THE ROUTINE ‐ REPAIRS. ‐ POLICE UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLCMNT UNSCHEDULED $ 400,000 GF052 101 294 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # THREE REPLACEMENT PATROL VEHICLES 171,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO ‐ BE REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE ‐ NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, ‐ MOBILE (INSTALLED) RADIO, VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM, ETC ‐ COMPONENTS MOUNTED INSIDE THE CAR CAN SOMETIMES BE ‐ TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD CAR TO THE NEW CAR, ‐ DEPENDING ON THE CONDITION. ‐ PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM, ‐ BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000 ‐ CALLS EACH YEAR. THEY ARE GENERALLY SHARED BY ‐ 2‐3 OFFICERS, MEANING THEY ARE OFTEN RUN FOR A ‐ COUPLE SHIFTS EACH DAY, AVERAGING OVER 20,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT ARE REACHING ‐ THE POINT WHERE THEY SHOULD NO LONGER BE USED ‐ AS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES. ‐ INCREASED BUDGET REQUEST: ‐ INCREASE IS BASED ON FY19 VEHICLE COSTS OF $61,000 ‐ PER VEHICLE, WITH COSTS LIKELY TO INCREASE. 12,000 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY DECLINE AS NEWER CARS ‐ REPLACE OLDER ONES. ONES. MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE ‐ STABILIZED DUE TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE AND ‐ A STANDARDIZED FLEET (FORD SUVS), EVEN THOUGH CALL ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2021 $ 183,000 GF053 (FY21) 102 295 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # THREE REPLACEMENT PATROL VEHICLES 180,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO ‐ BE REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE ‐ NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, ‐ MOBILE (INSTALLED) RADIO, VIDEO CAMERAS SYSTEM, ET ‐ COMPONENTS MOUNTED INSIDE THE CAR CAN SOMETIMES BE ‐ TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD CAR TO THE NEW CAR, ‐ DEPENDING ON THE CONDITION. ‐ PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM, ‐ BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000 ‐ CALLS EACH YEAR. THEY ARE GENERALLY SHARED BY ‐ 2‐3 OFFICERS, MEANING THEY ARE OFTEN RUN FOR A ‐ COUPLE SHIFTS EACH DAY, AVERAGING OVER 20,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT ARE REACHING ‐ THE POINT WHERE THEY SHOULD NO LONGER BE USED ‐ AS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES. ‐ INCREASED BUDGET REQUEST: ‐ INCREASE IS BASED ON FY19 VEHICLE COSTS OF $61,000 3,000 PER VEHICLE, WITH COSTS LIKELY TO INCREASE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY DECLINE AS NEWER CARS ‐ REPLACE OLDER ONES. MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE ‐ STABILIZED DUE TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE AND ‐ A STANDARDIZED FLEET (FORD SUVS), EVEN THOUGH CALL ‐ FOR SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS ‐ HAVE BEEN HIRED. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2022 $ 183,000 GF053 (FY22) 103 296 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TWO REPLACEMENT PATROL VEHICLES 122,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO BE ‐ BE REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE ‐ NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, ‐ MOBILE (INSTALLED) RADIO, VIDEO CAMERAS SYSTEM, ET ‐ COMPONENTS MOUNTED INSIDE THE CAR CAN SOMETIMES BE ‐ TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD CAR TO THE NEW CAR, ‐ DEPENDING ON THE CONDITION. ‐ PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM, ‐ BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000 ‐ CALLS EACH YEAR. THEY ARE GENERALLY SHARED BY ‐ 2‐3 OFFICERS, MEANING THEY ARE OFTEN RUN FOR A ‐ COUPLE SHIFTS EACH DAY, AVERAGING OVER 20,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT ARE REACHING ‐ THE POINT WHERE THEY SHOULD NO LONGER BE USED ‐ AS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES. ‐ INCREASED BUDGET REQUEST: 4,000 INCREASE IS BASED ON FY19 VEHICLE COSTS OF $61,000 ‐ PER VEHICLE, WITH COSTS LIKELY TO INCREASE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY DECLINE AS NEWER CARS ‐ REPLACE OLDER ONES. MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE ‐ STABILIZED DUE TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE AND ‐ A STANDARDIZED FLEET (FORD SUVS), EVEN THOUGH CALL ‐ FOR SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS ‐ HAVE BEEN HIRED. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2023 $ 126,000 GF053 (FY23) 104 297 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TWO REPLACEMENT PATROL VEHICLE: 124,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO ‐ BE REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE ‐ NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, ‐ MOBILE (INSTALLED) RADIO, VIDEO CAMERA, SYSTEM, ET ‐ COMPONENTS MOUNTED INSIDE THE CAR CAN SOMETIMES BE ‐ TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD CAR TO THE NEW CAR, ‐ DEPENDING ON THE CONDITION. ‐ PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM, ‐ BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000 ‐ CALLS EACH YEAR. THEY ARE GENERALLY SHARED BY ‐ 2‐3 OFFICERS, MEANING THEY ARE OFTEN RUN FOR ‐ COUPLE SHIFTS EACH DAY, AVERAGING OVER 20,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT ARE REACHING ‐ THE POINT WHERE THEY SHOULD NO LONGER BE USED ‐ AS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES. ‐ INCREASED BUDGET REQUEST: ‐ INCREASE IS BASED ON FY19 VEHICLE COST OF $61,000 2,000 PER VEHICLE, WITH COSTS LIKELY TO INCREASE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY DECLINE AS NEWER CARS ‐ REPLACE OLDER ONES. MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE ‐ STABILIZED DUE TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE AND ‐ A STANDARDIZED FLEET (FORD SUVS), EVEN THOUGH CALL ‐ FOR SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS ‐ HAVE BEEN HIRED. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2024 $ 126,000 GF053 (FY24) 105 298 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # THREE REPLACEMENT PATROL VEHICLES 192,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO ‐ BE REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE ‐ NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, ‐ MOBILE (INSTALLED) RADIO, VIDEO CAMERAS SYSTEM, ET ‐ COMPONENTS MOUNTED INSIDE THE CAR CAN SOMETIMES BE ‐ TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD CAR TO THE NEW CAR, ‐ DEPENDING ON THE CONDITION. ‐ PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM, ‐ BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000 ‐ CALLS EACH YEAR. THEY ARE GENERALLY SHARED BY ‐ 2‐3 OFFICERS, MEANING THEY ARE OFTEN RUN FOR ‐ COUPLE SHIFTS EACH DAY, AVERAGING OVER 20,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT ARE REACHING ‐ THE POINT WHERE THEY SHOULD NO LONGER BE USED ‐ AS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY DECLINE AS NEWER CARS ‐ REPLACE OLDER ONES. MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE ‐ STABILIZED DUE TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE AND ‐ A STANDARDIZED FLEET (FORD SUVS), EVEN THOUGH CALL ‐ FOR SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS ‐ HAVE BEEN HIRED. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2025 $ 192,000 GF053 (FY25) 106 299 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TEN REPLACEMENT PATROL VEHICLES: 640,000 OUR PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO ‐ BE REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE ‐ NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, ‐ MOBILE (INSTALLED) RADIO, VIDEO CAMERA, SYSTEM, ET ‐ COMPONENTS MOUNTED INSIDE THE CAR CAN SOMETIMES BE ‐ TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD CAR TO THE NEW CAR, ‐ DEPENDING ON THE CONDITION. ‐ PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM, ‐ BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000 ‐ CALLS EACH YEAR. THEY ARE GENERALLY SHARED BY ‐ 2‐3 OFFICERS, MEANING THEY ARE OFTEN RUN FOR ‐ COUPLE SHIFTS EACH DAY, AVERAGING OVER 20,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT ARE REACHING ‐ THE POINT WHERE THEY SHOULD NO LONGER BE USED ‐ AS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES. ‐ AT THIS POINT, THERE ARE 10 MARKED PATROL VEHICLES ‐ UNSCHEDULED FOR REPLACEMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY DECLINE AS NEWER CARS ‐ REPLACE OLDER ONES. MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE ‐ STABILIZED DUE TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE AND ‐ A STANDARDIZED FLEET (FORD SUVS), EVEN THOUGH CALL ‐ FOR SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS HAVE BEEN HIRED. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT UNSCHEDULED $ 640,000 GF053 (UNSCHEDULED) 107 300 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIVE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS FOR PATROL VEHICLES 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MOBILE DATA TERMINAL ("MDT") IS A CRITICAL ‐ COMPONENT IN ALL PATROL VEHICLES. THE MDT ‐ IS THE MOBILE COMPUTER MOUNTED IN THE VEHICLE ‐ THAT OFFICERS UTILIZE TO SEE INFORMATION ABOUT ‐ CURRENT CALLS FOR SERVICE, LOOK UP AND RETRIEVE ‐ CRITICAL DATA, ENTER CALL RELATED DATA, AND PRINT ‐ FORMS, INCLUDING CITATIONS. ‐ THIS ITEM IS CULLED OUT FROM ‐ PATROL VEHICLE REQUESTS BECAUSE WE HAVE ‐ FOUND THAT A MOBILE DATA TERMINAL NEEDS ‐ REPLACEMENT ABOUT EVERY 5 YEARS, AND MANY OF OUR ‐ VEHICLES ARE BEING USED FOR 6,7, OR 8 YEARS. ‐ IN ADDITION, WE ANTICIPATE MIGRATING TO A MORE ‐ PORTABLE, SMALLER, REMOVABLE MDT WHICH WILL ‐ INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO ‐ REMOVE THEM FROM THE PATROL VEHICLE AND ‐ UTILIZE IT MORE FREQUENTLY AND IN A WIDER VARIETY ‐ OF WAYS. THIS DIRECTION MAY ALSO LEAD TO LESS ‐ DESKTOP COMPUTERS BEING PURCHASED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ALTERNATIVE IS TO CONTINUE TO USE THE EXISTING ‐ MDTS, ALTHOUGH THEY OFTEN BECOME NEARLY ‐ UNUSABLE DUE TO POOR CONNECTIVITY AND MUCH ‐ SLOWER SPEEDS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS ARE GENERALLY LOW DURING THE FIVE ‐ YEAR ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THE MDT. OPERATING COSTS ARE BUILT INTO THE BUDGET, WITH MAINTENANCE ‐ PERFORMED BY STAFF OR FREQUENTLY UNDER WARRANTY. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP 2021 $ 30,000 GF292 (FY21) 108 301 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIVE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS FOR PATROL VEHICLES 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MOBILE DATA TERMINAL ("MDT") IS A CRITICAL ‐ COMPONENT IN ALL PATROL VEHICLES. THE MDT ‐ IS THE MOBILE COMPUTER MOUNTED IN THE VEHICLE ‐ THAT OFFICERS UTILIZE TO SEE INFORMATION ABOUT ‐ CURRENT CALLS FOR SERVICE, LOOK UP AND RETRIEVE ‐ CRITICAL DATA, ENTER CALL RELATED DATA, AND PRINT FORMS, INCLUDING CITATIONS. THIS ITEM IS CULLED OUT FROM PATROL VEHICLE REQUESTS BECAUSE WE HAVE FOUND THAT A MOBILE DATA TERMINAL NEEDS REPLACEMENT ABOUT EVERY 5 YEARS, AND MANY OF OUR VEHICLES ARE BEING USED FOR 6,7, OR 8 YEARS. IN ADDITION, WE ANTICIPATE MIGRATING TO A MORE PORTABLE, SMALLER, REMOVABLE MDT WHICH WILL INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO REMOVE THEM FROM THE PATROL VEHICLE AND UTILIZE IT MORE FREQUENTLY AND IN A WIDER VARIETY OF WAYS. THIS DIRECTION MAY ALSO LEAD TO LESS ‐ DESKTOP COMPUTERS BEING PURCHASED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ALTERNATIVE IS TO CONTINUE TO USE THE EXISTING ‐ MDTS, ALTHOUGH THEY OFTEN BECOME NEARLY ‐ UNUSABLE DUE TO POOR CONNECTIVITY AND MUCH ‐ SLOWER SPEEDS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS ARE GENERALLY LOW DURING THE FIVE ‐ YEAR ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THE MDT. OPERATING ‐ COSTS ARE BUILT INTO THE BUDGET, WITH MAINTENANCE ‐ PERFORMED BY STAFF OR FREQUENTLY UNDER WARRANTY. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP 2022 $ 30,000 GF292 (FY22) 109 302 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIVE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS FOR PATROL VEHICLES 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MOBILE DATA TERMINAL ("MDT") IS A CRITICAL ‐ COMPONENT IN ALL PATROL VEHICLES. THE MDT ‐ IS THE MOBILE COMPUTER MOUNTED IN THE VEHICLE ‐ THAT OFFICERS UTILIZE TO SEE INFORMATION ABOUT ‐ CURRENT CALLS FOR SERVICE, LOOK UP AND RETRIEVE ‐ CRITICAL DATA, ENTER CALL RELATED DATA, AND PRINT ‐ FORMS, INCLUDING CITATIONS. ‐ THIS ITEM IS CULLED OUT FROM ‐ PATROL VEHICLE REQUESTS BECAUSE WE ‐ ARE FINDING THAT A MOBILE DATA TERMINAL NEEDS ‐ REPLACEMENT ABOUT EVERY 5 YEARS, AND MANY OF OUR ‐ VEHICLES ARE BEING USED FOR 6, 7, OR 8 YEARS. ‐ IN ADDITION, WE ANTICIPATE MIGRATING TO A MORE ‐ PORTABLE, SMALLER, REMOVABLE MDT WHICH WILL ‐ INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO ‐ REMOVE THEM FROM THE PATROL VEHICLE AND ‐ UTILIZE IT MORE FREQUENTLY AND IN A WIDER VARIETY ‐ OF WAYS. THIS DIRECTION MAY ALSO LEAD TO LESS ‐ DESKTOP COMPUTERS BEING PURCHASED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ALTERNATIVE IS TO CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING, ‐ MDTS, ALTHOUGH THEY OFTEN BECOME NEARLY ‐ UNUSABLE DUE TO POOR CONNECTIVITY AND MUCH ‐ SLOWER SPEEDS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS ARE GENERALLY LOW DURING THE FIVE ‐ YEAR ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THE MDT. OPERATING ‐ COSTS ARE BUILT INTO THE BUDGET, WITH MAINTENANCE ‐ PERFORMED BY STAFF OR FREQUENTLY UNDER WARRANTY. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP 2023 $ 30,000 GF292 (FY23) 110 303 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIVE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS FOR PATROL VEHICLES: 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MOBILE DATA TERMINAL ("MDT") IS A CRITICAL ‐ COMPONENT IN ALL PATROL VEHICLES. THE MDT ‐ IS THE MOBILE COMPUTER MOUNTED IN THE VEHICLE ‐ THAT OFFICERS UTILIZE TO SEE INFORMATION ABOUT ‐ CURRENT CALLS FOR SERVICE, LOOK UP AND RETRIEVE ‐ CRITICAL DATA, ENTER CALL RELATED DATA, AND PRINT ‐ FORMS, INCLUDING CITATIONS. ‐ THIS ITEM IS CULLED OUT FROM ‐ PATROL VEHICLE REQUESTS BECAUSE WE HAVE ‐ FOUND THAT A MOBILE DATA TERMINAL NEEDS ‐ REPLACEMENT ABOUT EVERY 5 YEARS, AND MANY OF OUR ‐ VEHICLES ARE BEING USED FOR 6,7, OR 8 YEARS. ‐ IN ADDITION, WE ANTICIPATE MIGRATING TO A MORE ‐ PORTABLE, SMALLER, REMOVABLE MDT WHICH WILL ‐ INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO ‐ REMOVE THEM FROM THE PATROL VEHICLE AND ‐ UTILIZE IT MORE FREQUENTLY AND IN A WIDER VARIETY ‐ OF WAYS. THIS DIRECTION MAY ALSO LEAD TO LESS ‐ DESKTOP COMPUTERS BEING PURCHASED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ALTERNATIVE IS TO CONTINUE TO USE THE EXISTING ‐ MDTS, ALTHOUGH THEY OFTEN BECOME NEARLY ‐ UNUSABLE DUE TO POOR CONNECTIVITY AND MUCH ‐ SLOWER SPEEDS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS ARE GENERALLY LOW DURING THE FIVE ‐ YEAR ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THE MDT. OPERATING ‐ COSTS ARE BUILT INTO THE BUDGET, WITH MAINTENANCE ‐ PERFORMED BY STAFF OR FREQUENTLY UNDER WARRANTY. ‐ INCREASED BUDGET REQUEST: 5,000 REQUEST IS DUE TO ANTICIPATED HIGHER PRICES ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP 2024 $ 35,000 GF292 (FY24) 111 304 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIVE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS FOR PATROL VEHICLES 35,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MOBILE DATA TERMINAL ("MDT") IS A CRITICAL ‐ COMPONENT IN ALL PATROL VEHICLES. THE MDT ‐ IS THE MOBILE COMPUTER MOUNTED IN THE VEHICLE ‐ THAT OFFICERS UTILIZE TO SEE INFORMATION ABOUT ‐ CURRENT CALLS FOR SERVICE, LOOK UP AND RETRIEVE ‐ CRITICAL DATA, ENTER CALL RELATED DATA, AND PRINT ‐ FORMS, INCLUDING CITATIONS. ‐ THESE ITEMS ARE CULLED OUT FROM THE ‐ PATROL VEHICLE REQUESTS BECAUSE WE HAVE ‐ FOUND THAT A MOBILE DATA TERMINAL NEEDS ‐ REPLACEMENT ABOUT EVERY 5 YEARS, AND MANY OF OUR ‐ VEHICLES ARE BEING USED FOR 6,7, OR 8 YEARS. ‐ IN ADDITION, WE ANTICIPATE MIGRATING TO A MORE ‐ PORTABLE, SMALLER, REMOVABLE MDT WHICH WILL ‐ INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO ‐ REMOVE THEM FROM THE PATROL VEHICLE AND: ‐ UTILIZE IT MORE FREQUENTLY AND IN A WIDER VARIETY ‐ OF WAYS. THIS DIRECTION MAY ALSO LEAD TO LESS ‐ DESKTOP COMPUTERS BEING PURCHASED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ALTERNATIVE IS TO CONTINUE TO USE THE EXISTING ‐ MDTS, ALTHOUGH THEY OFTEN BECOME NEARLY ‐ UNUSABLE DUE TO POOR CONNECTIVITY AND MUCH ‐ SLOWER SPEEDS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS ARE GENERALLY LOW DURING THE FIVE ‐ YEAR ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THE MDT. OPERATING ‐ COSTS ARE BUILT INTO THE BUDGET, WITH MAINTENANCE ‐ PERFORMED BY STAFF OR FREQUENTLY UNDER WARRANTY. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP 2025 $ 35,000 GF292 (FY25) 112 305 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # 25 MOBILE DATA TERMINALS FOR PATROL VEHICLES: 175,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MOBILE DATA TERMINAL ("MDT") IS A CRITICALTHE ‐ COMPONENT IN ALL PATROL VEHICLES. THE MDT ‐ IS THE MOBILE COMPUTER MOUNTED IN THE VEHICLE ‐ THAT OFFICERS UTILIZE TO SEE INFORMATION ABOUT ‐ CURRENT CALLS FOR SERVICE, LOOK UP AND RETRIEVE ‐ CRITICAL DATA, ENTER CALL RELATED DATA, AND PRINT ‐ FORMS, INCLUDING CITATIONS. ‐ THIS ITEM IS CULLED OUT FROM ‐ PATROL VEHICLE REQUESTS BECAUSE WE HAVE ‐ FOUND THAT A MOBILE DATA TERMINAL NEEDS ‐ REPLACEMENT ABOUT EVERY 5 YEARS, AND MANY OF OUR ‐ VEHICLES ARE BEING USED FOR 6,7, OR 8 YEARS. ‐ IN ADDITION, WE ANTICIPATE MIGRATING TO A MORE ‐ PORTABLE, SMALLER, REMOVABLE MDT WHICH WILL ‐ INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO ‐ REMOVE THEM FROM THE PATROL VEHICLE AND ‐ UTILIZE IT MORE FREQUENTLY AND IN A WIDER VARIETY ‐ OF WAYS. THIS DIRECTION MAY ALSO LEAD TO LESS ‐ DESKTOP COMPUTERS BEING PURCHASED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ALTERNATIVE IS TO CONTINUE TO USE THE EXISTING ‐ MDTS, ALTHOUGH THEY OFTEN BECOME NEARLY ‐ UNUSABLE DUE TO POOR CONNECTIVITY AND MUCH ‐ SLOWER SPEEDS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS ARE GENERALLY LOW DURING THE FIVE ‐ YEAR ANTICIPATED LIFE SPAN OF THE MDT. OPERATING ‐ COSTS ARE BUILT INTO THE BUDGET, WITH MAINTENANCE ‐ PERFORMED BY STAFF OR FREQUENTLY UNDER WARRANTY. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP UNSCHEDULED $ 175,000 GF292 (UNSCHEDULE D) 113 306 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLE: TRANSPORT VEHICLE 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS REQUEST WAS INITIALLY FOR 2 NEW VEHICLES FOR 2 NEW SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS. HOWEVER, WE ANTICIPATE MIGRATING TOWARD A PROGRAM WHEREBY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS UTILIZE OLDER, MARKED PATROL VEHICLES FOR INCREASED VISIBILITY AND, THEREBY, SAFETY FOR THE SCHOOLS. INSTEAD, WITH THE COMPLETION OF THE BOZEMAN PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER AROUND THIS TIME, WE ANTICIPATE THE NEED FOR A DEDICATED VEHICLE TO TRANSPORT SUBJECTS IN CUSTODY FROM THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL COURT TO THE GALLATIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER. IN ADDITION, THIS VEHICLE COULD BE USED FOR OTHER TRANSPORTING PURPOSES. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: THE ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE TO UTILIZE A FULLY EQUIPPED PATROL VEHICLE, INCREASING THE MILEAGE ‐ AND USE OF A MUCH HIGHER PRICED, EMERGENCY ‐ RESPONSE CAPABLE VEHICLE. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: COSTS ON A DEDICATED VEHICLE ‐ WOULD LIKELY BE LESS THAN USING A PATROL VEHICLE. ‐ POLICE NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES 2022 $ 30,000 GF293 (FY22) 114 307 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ONE ADDITIONAL PATROL VEHICLE 59,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ A REVIEW OF MILEAGE AND ESTIMATED STAFFING ‐ INCREASES IN PATROL BY 2‐3 OFFICERS OVER THE NEXT ‐ FEW YEARS HAS LED TO THE IDENTIFIED NEED FOR ‐ AN ADDITIONAL PATROL VEHICLE IN FY21. THIS WOULD ‐ BRING THE TOTAL PATROL RESPONSE VEHICLES TO 23 ‐ (1 UNMARKED / 2 K9 VEHICLE, 20 FULLY MARKED). ‐ PRICE INCLUDES ALL OF THE ‐ NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, ‐ MOBILE (INSTALLED) RADIO, VIDEO CAMERA, SYSTEM, ET ‐ PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM, ‐ BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000 ‐ CALLS EACH YEAR. THEY ARE GENERALLY SHARED BY. ‐ 2‐3 OFFICERS, MEANING THEY ARE OFTEN RUN FOR A ‐ COUPLE SHIFTS EACH DAY, AVERAGING OVER 20,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ INCREASED BUDGET REQUEST: 2,000 INCREASE IS BASED ON FY19 VEHICLE COST OF $61,000 ‐ PER VEHICLE, WITH COSTS LIKELY TO INCREASE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE PATROL RESPONSE WITH EXISTING PATROL CARS ‐ ADDITIONAL PATROL VEHICLE: 62,000 WE ANTICIPATE THE NEED FOR AN ‐ ADDITIONAL PATROL VEHICLE DUE TO INCREASED ‐ STAFFING AND DEMANDS FOR SERVICE. THIS VEHICLE ‐ WOULD BE A PRIMARY REPONSE VEHICLE UTILIZED BY THE ‐ THE PATROL DIVISION. THESE VEHICLES ARE SHARED ‐ BY TWO OR THREE PATROL OFFICERS AND GENERALLY ‐ USED ON MULTIPLE SHIFTS IN ALL TYPES OF WEATHER ‐ CONDITIONS. THESE VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH ‐ LIGHTBARS, A RADIO SYSTEM, A TRANSPORT SEAT AND ‐ DIVIDER, A SIREN, A VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM, AND ‐ MANY OTHER ITEMS NECESSARY FOR PATROL RESPONSE. ‐ POLICE PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL 2024 $ 62,000 GF294 POLICE PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL 2021 $ 61,000 GF294 115 308 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BODY CAMERA SYSTEM: 70,000 WITH THE SCRUTINY OF POLICE OFFICERS AND THEIR ‐ ACTIONS INCREASING EVERY YEAR, WE ANTICIPATE THE NEED TO IMPLEMENT A DEPARTMENT‐WIDE BODY CAMERA SYSTEM AT SOME POINT. THIS SYSTEM WOULD INCLUDE ENOUGH CAMERAS TO OUTFIT EACH PATROL OFFICER, ALONG WITH THE NECESSARY HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO MAKE THE SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO DELAY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A SYSTEM. DESIGN & CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS 110,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DESIGN PORTION FOR CONSTRUCTION IN FY22. ‐ INDOOR/OUTDOOR AQUATICS CENTER. THIS ITEM WAS ‐ IDENTIFIED AS A TOP TEN CAPITAL FACILITY ‐ RECOMMENDATION IN THE PROST PLAN, ADOPTED ‐ OCTOBER 2007. THE DESIGN PHASE IN FY18 INCLUDES ‐ THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE FAMILY AQUATICS ‐ CENTER. THIS PROJECT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY ‐ THE VOTERS. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT AN ELECTION WOULD ‐ BE OFFERED IN THE FALL OF 2021. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT BUILD A COMMUNITY AQUATICS CENTER. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF AN AQUATICS CENTER: SAFE AND ‐ HEALTHY PLACE FOR FAMILIES TO PLAY, CONNECTED ‐ FAMILIES, STRONG VITAL INVOLVED COMMUNITY, AND ‐ INCREASED COMMUNITY PROGRAMS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS TO ‐ INCLUDE ADDITIONAL AQUATIC STAFF. ‐ COST UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIME. ‐ RECREATION DESIGN & CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS 2023 $ 110,000 GF056 (FY23) POLICE POLICE BODY CAMERA SYSTEM 2024 $ 70,000 GF316 116 309 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DESIGN & CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS 16,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ BOND ISSUANCE AND CONSTRUCTION ‐ INDOOR/OUTDOOR AQUATICS CENTER. THIS ITEM WAS ‐ IDENTIFIED AS A TOP TEN CAPITAL FACILITY ‐ RECOMMENDATION IN THE PROST PLAN, ADOPTED OCTOBER 2007. THE DESIGN PHASE IN FY18 INCLUDES THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE FAMILY AQUATICS CENTER. THIS PROJECT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE VOTERS. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT AN ELECTION WOULD BE OFFERED IN THE FALL OF 2021. ALTERNTAIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT BUILD A COMMUNITY AQUATICS CENTER. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF AN AQUATICS CENTER: SAFE AND ‐ HEALTHY PLACE FOR FAMILIES TO PLAY, CONNECTED ‐ FAMILIES, STRONG VITAL INVOLVED COMMUNITY, AND ‐ INCREASED COMMUNITY PROGRAMS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS TO ‐ ADDITIONAL AQUATIC STAFF. ‐ COST UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIME. ‐ FUNDING SOURCES: ‐ BOND AND GENERAL FUND ‐ INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION 2,040,000 RECREATION CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS 2024 $ 18,540,000 GF056 (FY24) 117 310 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS 949,300 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE SWIM CENTER REQUIRES NUMEROUS REPAIR AND ‐ EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTS WHICH WOULD BE ADDED ‐ TO THE BOND INITIATIVE FOR THE INDOOR/OUTDOOR ‐ AQUATICS CENTER. THESE ITEMS INCLUDE: GUTTER ‐ REPLACEMENT;DECK TILE REPLACEMENT; ‐ REPLACEMENT OF CEILING TILES; ‐ HVAC UNIT REPLACEMENT; ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THESE PROJECTS WILL HELP TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE ‐ ABLE TO MAINTAIN A SAFE AND FUNCTIONAL FACILITY. ‐ THE POOL IS EXTREMELY WELL UTILIZED AND REPAIRS ‐ AND REPLACEMENTS ARE NECESSARY OVER TIME IN ‐ ORDER TO CONTINUE TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NO ADDITIONAL ANNUAL OPERATING AND ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION 38,000 INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION 12,700 LINDLEY CENTER PARKING LOT RESURFACING 75,388 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CURB AND OVERLAY, INCLUDE ADA PARKING STALLS, AND ‐ LIGHTS. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: KEEP LOT GRAVEL ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: COMPLY WITH CITY CODE, ‐ MORE ORGANIZED PARKING, SAFER, ACCESSIBILITY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: STRIPPING & PERIODIC OVERLAYS ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: 4% INCREASE FOR INFLATION 3,012 RECREATION LINDLEY CENTER PARKING LOT RESURFACING 2024 $ 78,400 GF140 RECREATION SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY 2024 $ 1,000,000 GF137 118 311 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PROST PLAN UPDATE $114,000 57,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ HALF THE EXPENSE IS PAID FOR BY RECREATION. ‐ UPDATE THE 2007 PARKS RECREATION OPEN SPACE ‐ TRAIL (PROST) PLAN. THE CURRENT PLAN IS NOW 13 ‐ YEARS OLD. SINCE ADOPTION, THE CITY HAS GROWN IN ‐ SIZE, NEW PARK PROPERTIES HAVE COME INTO THE ‐ SYSTEM, AND LOCAL DEMOGRAPHICS HAVE CHANGED. ‐ THIS PROJECT ANTICIPATES HIRING AN OUTSIDE PARTY ‐ TO UPDATE THE PLAN THAT WILL TAKE INTO ‐ CONSIDERATION THE UPDATED COMMUNITY PLAN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ DO NOT UPDATE THE PLAN ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE UPDATE WOULD RECORD AND REFERENCE NEW ‐ AND ACCURATE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN ‐ DEVELOPING OVER THE LAST 13 YEARS. ‐ ANALYSIS AND 2012 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY. ‐ DESCRIPTION: 320,300 THIS PROJECT IS THE COMBINATION OF REQUESTS FOR ‐ UPGRADE OF THE RESTROOMS, WINDOW ‐ REPLACEMENT, SIDING REPLACEMENT ‐ REPLACEMENT, KITCHEN UPGRADE, ‐ EAST ROOF INSULATION, FLOOR SUPPORT, ‐ ROOF SUPPORT. THIS IS A HEAVILY USED COMMUNITY ‐ BUILDING. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: COMPLETE THE ‐ PROJECT IN PHASES. ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ 1. BRINGS RESTROOMS UP TO CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS ‐ 2. BRINGS RESTROOMS UP TO CURRENT CITY OF BOZEMAN ‐ BUILDING CODES 3. IMPROVES SANITATION IN THE ‐ RESTROOMS AND KITCHEN FACILITIES 4. REHABS AND ‐ SECURES THE BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR YEARS TO COME. ‐ 5. REDUCED ENERGY CONSUMPTION FROM IMPROVED ‐ WINDOWS AND INSULATION. 6. ADDRESSES DEFICIENCIES ‐ THAT WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE 2014 STRUCTURAL ‐ ANALYSIS AND 2012 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: 4% INCREASE FOR INFLATION 12,800 RECREATION LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE 2023 $ 333,100 GF209 RECREATION PROST PLAN UPDATES 2021 $ 57,000 GF205 119 312 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BOGERT POOL RENOVATION 483,000 BOGERT POOL IS BEGINNING TO SHOW ITS WEAR FASTER ‐ EVERY YEAR. THIS PROJECT WOULD REPLACE THE COPING ‐ AROUND THE POOL THAT IS CRACKED IN SEVERAL AREAS ‐ AND THE POOL GUTTERS THAT ARE CRACKING, CRUMBLING, AND/OR LIFTING FROM THE POOL EDGE. ALL OF THE LEAKS THAT COULD BE PATCHED WITHOUT DIGGING UP THE BOTTOM OF THE POOL HAVE BEEN PATCHED. THERE IS MINIMAL LEAKING IN THE RETURN PIPES TO THE POOL ‐ BUT WE RECOMMEND REPAIRING THE LEAKS IN THE ‐ RETURNING PIPING THAT WERE IDENTIFIED IN MAY OF ‐ 2015, BEFORE THE POOL IS BLASTED WITH SAND OR HIGH ‐ PRESSURE WATER, PREPPED, AND RESURFACED. THE ‐ RETAINING WALL IS GOING TO BE REPLACED WITH A ‐ WROUGHT IRON FENCE TO ALLOW MORE VISIBILITY TO ‐ THE FACILITY AT NIGHT AND PROVIDE MORE STRUCTURE, ‐ AS THE CURRENT WALL IS WEAKENING. THE SECTIONS OF ‐ THE DECKING IN FRONT OF THE LOCKER ROOMS HAVE ‐ SUNKEN OVER THE YEARS AND WILL ALSO BE REPLACED. ‐ THE BOGERT POOL RENOVATION OR REPLACEMENT WITH AN ‐ ALTERNATE WATER FEATURE WOULD BE ADDED TO THE BOND ‐ INITIATIVE FOR THE INDOOR/OUTDOOR AQUATIC CENTER. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CURRENT GUTTERS ARE DISINTEGRATING BETWEEN THE ‐ GUTTER AND THE LEDGE OF THE POOL WHERE THERE ‐ GUTTER SITS. SEVERAL GUTTER TILES NEED TO BE ‐ RE‐ADHERED TO THE POOL LEDGE EVERY SPRING AND ‐ OFTEN DURING THE POOL SEASON. IF A TILE IS STILL ‐ ATTACHED BUT LOOSE, IT CAN EASILY BE PULLED FROM ‐ THE WALL. SEVERAL OF THE GUTTER TILES HAVE BEEN ‐ REPLACED THROUGH THE YEARS. IN MANY PLACES, ‐ A SPACE WAS NOT LEFT BETWEEN THE TILES. THIS ‐ DOESN T ALLOW THE WATER TO FLOW INTO THE GUTTER ‐ SYSTEM FOR OPTIMAL WATER CIRCULATION. THE SURFACE ‐ OF THE POOL IS CURRENTLY BEING PATCHED WITH ‐ HYDRAULIC CEMENT IN AREAS WHERE THE PLASTER IS ‐ COMING UP. A NEW SURFACE WOULD WORK TO PROTECT THE ‐ STRUCTURE OF THE POOL. ‐ INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION 50,000 RECREATION BOGERT POOL RENOVATION 2024 $ 533,000 GF238 120 313 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT 110,000 DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING GYM FLOOR ‐ WITH A WOOD FLOOR THAT IS MORE DURABLE, LOWER ‐ MAINTENANCE, AND CONDUCIVE TO MULTIPLE USES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NONE. WOOD FLOOR IS THE ‐ BEST OPTION FOR FUNCTIONALITY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DURABILITY, INCREASED PROGRAM OPTIONS, INCREASED ‐ PROGRAM REVENUE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ‐ CHANGE FROM LAST CIP: UPDATED BID INCREASED 16,000 STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT. DESCRIPTION: 60,000 THE EXTERIOR PAINT AT THE STORY MANSION HAS ‐ STARTED TO FADE AND PEEL. IT WAS LAST PAINTED IN ‐ 2007 AND HAS AN EXPECTED SERVICE LIFE OF 10 YEARS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:NONE. ADVANTAGES OF ‐ APPROVAL:DUE TO THE CURRENT PEELING AND FADING OF ‐ THE PAINT, WE RISK COMPROMISING THE SIDING WHICH ‐ COULD NEED REPLACEMENT DUE TO DAMAGE AND WOULD BE ‐ A SIGNIFICANTLY MORE EXPENSIVE PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: REPAINTING EVERY 8‐10 ‐ YEARS. CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: 4% INCREASE FOR INFLATION 2,500 PASSENGER VAN 35,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PURCHASE OF A 15 PASSENGER VAN FOR PARKS ‐ AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAMS AS WELL AS ‐ OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS USE AS NEEDED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NONE ‐ OUR CURRENT PASSENGER VAN CAN ACCOMMODATE 13 ‐ CHILDREN AND 2 STAFF WHEN USED FOR PROGRAMS. THE ‐ MAJORITY OF OUR PROGRAMS HAVE A MAX CAPACITY OF 20 ‐ OR MORE, WHICH MEANS MULTIPLE TRIPS AND ADDITIONAL ‐ STAFF SUPPORT IS REQUIRED WHEN TRANSPORTING ‐ PARTICIPANTS, OR A LOWER MAX NUMBER PUT ON THE ‐ PROGRAM. ANOTHER VAN WOULD BETTER MEET CURRENT ‐ NEEDS. ADD OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: UPDATED BID INCREASED 2,000 RECREATION PASSENGER VAN 2021 $ 37,000 GF302 RECREATION STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT. 2021 $ 62,500 GF301 RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT 2022 $ 126,000 GF300 121 314 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM 50,000 DESCRIPTION: INSTALLING AN HVAC SYSTEM IN THE SMCC ‐ GYM TO PROVIDE THE CLIMATE CONTROL NECESSARY FOR ‐ PROTECTING THE WOOD FLOOR AND OCCUPANT COMFORT AND ‐ SAFETY. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NONE, PROJECT IS ‐ REQUIRED IF A NEW FLOOR IS INSTALLED IN THE GYM ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: LONGEVITY OF THE WOOD ‐ FLOOR, OCCUPANT COMFORT AND SAFETY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: SYSTEM INCLUDES COOLING AND 70,000 DESIGN FEES. ‐ STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOM 55,000 DESCRIPTION: RENOVATION OF ONE OF THE TWO ‐ MULTIPURPOSE ROOMS AT SMCC. INCLUDES WALL ‐ FINISHES, ACOUSTICAL CEILING FINISHES, DOORS, ‐ ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING UPGRADES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: COMPLETE IN PHASES ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: IMPROVED FUNCTION, ‐ INCREASED RENTAL REVENUE, EFFICIENT LIGHTING AND ‐ SAVINGS, INCREASED RENTAL REVENUE, ADDITIONAL CITY ‐ MEETING ROOM ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: 4% INCREASE FOR INFLATION 2,200 HVAC SYSTEM FOR STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER OFFICE 40,100 DESCRIPTION: INSTALLING AN HVAC SYSTEM IN THE ‐ OFFICE WING AND MULTIPURPOSE ROOMS AT SMCC ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NOT INSTALLING THE SYSTEM ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: CLIMATE CONTROL IN ROOMS ‐ THAT WE RUN PROGRAMS IN AND IN CITY OFFICES ‐ FOR OCCUPANT COMFORT AND EFFICIENCY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: INCLUDED THE TWO ‐ MULTIPURPOSE ROOMS AND COOLING 119,900 RECREATION HVAC SYSTEM FOR STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER OFFICE 2025 $ 160,000 GF336 RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOM RENOVATION 2025 $ 57,200 GF334 RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM 2021 $ 120,000 GF333 122 315 Department Name Year Description Amount Total Project # RECREATION SOFTWARE 37,200 DESCRIPTION: NEW RECREATION SOFTWARE ‐ SYSTEM THAT WILL BETTER MANAGE OUR PROGRAM ‐ REGISTRATIONS, FACILITY AND PARK RESERVATIONS ‐ DAILY POOL ADMISSIONS AND PASSES, AND PROVIDE DATA ‐ THIS SYSTEM WILL REPLACE SPORTSMANS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NOT REPLACING SPORTSMANS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: MORE INTUITIVE SYSTEM, ‐ IMPROVED DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING, IMPROVED ‐ EFFICIENCY, IMPROVED CUSTOMER SERVICE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ‐ ENERGY PROJECTS FOR CITY HALL 75,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CITY HALL IS A LEED‐SILVER CERTIFIED BUILDING AND ‐ IS CURRENTLY UNDER PERFORMING. A RECENT ENERGY ‐ STAR REVIEW FOUND THAT CITY HALL SCORED A 30 ON ‐ A SCALE OF 1‐100, INDICATING THAT THE ENERGY ‐ PERFORMANCE OF THE BUILDING HAS DECLINED AS ‐ EQUIPMENT HAS AGED OR BEEN REPLACED, AND SPACE ‐ MODIFIED. MANY ISSUES WERE ADDRESSED IN 2008 WITH ‐ A REMODEL, BUT CERTAIN PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE ‐ HEATING HOT WATER SYSTEM BALANCE WERE NOT ‐ ADDRESSED DUE TO BUDGET CONSTRAINTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVED HVAC SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND REDUCED ‐ UTILITY COSTS (ESTIMATED TO BE AT LEAST $2,4000 ‐ ANNUALLY). ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE, RATHER A REDUCTION ‐ SUSTAINABILITY ENERGY PROJECTS CITY HALL 2022 $ 75,000 GF245 RECREATION RECREATION SOFTWARE 2022 $ 37,200 GF348 123 316 Library Depreciation 124 317 LIBRARY DEPRECIATION FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 405,810 $ 105,866 $ 74,506 $ 43,959 $ 14,241 $ 57,369 Plus: Estimated Annual Unspent Appropriations $ 42,057 $ 40,640 $ 41,453 $ 42,282 $ 43,128 $ 43,990 $ ‐ Less: Carryover FY19 Capital Projects $ (62,000) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs** $ (280,000) $ (72,000) $ (72,000) $ (72,000) $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 105,866 $ 74,506 $ 43,959 $ 14,241 $ 57,369 $ 101,359 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Library Budget $ 2,213,510 $ 2,257,780 $ 2,302,936 $ 2,348,995 $ 2,395,974 $ 2,443,894 Estimated Amount of Budget left Unused 1.9% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% Estimated Annual Unspent Appropriations $ 42,057 $ 40,640 $ 41,453 $ 42,282 $ 43,128 $ 43,990 Current Budget Amount Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 42,057 $ 40,640 $ 41,453 $ 42,282 $ 43,128 $ 43,990 Appropriation FY2 280,000 LIB26 Conveyor (150,000) LIb27 Re configure (50,000) LIB12 Parking lot (65,000) LIB22 Carpet (15,000) ‐ Projected Projected ** Originally LIB22 for carpet $230,000 and Lib27 for $50,000. Proposed change $150,000 for LIB26 (was in FY21 for $75,000 and pricing came back 150k and is needed this year), LIB 27 for $50,000 and remaining of 280k appropriations going towards the parking lot CURRENT $(72,000) $(72,000) $(72,000) $‐ $‐ $‐ FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED LIBRARY DEPRECIATION FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 125 318 LIBRARY DEPRECIATION FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled LIB22 NEW CARPET PUBLIC AREA 15,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ LIB27 RECONFIGURE CUSTOMER COUNTER 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ LIB26 MATERIALS CONVEYOR SYSTEM 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ LIB12 PARKING LOT REPAIRS NOT ROLLED FY17 65,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fiscal Year totals 215,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ** Originally LIB22 for carpet $230,000 and Lib27 for $50,000. Proposed change $150,000 for LIB26 (was in FY21 for $75,000 and pricing came back 150k and is needed this year), LIB 27 for $50,000 and remaining of 280k appropriations going towards the parking lot repairs. FY20 Appropriation 280,000 NEW CARPET PUBLIC AREA (15,000) RECONFIGURE CUSTOMER COUNTER (50,000) MATERIALS CONVEYOR SYSTEM (150,000) PARKING LOT REPAIRS NOT ROLLED FY17 (65,000) ‐ 126 319 LIBRARY DEPRECIATION FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND Any unspent budget authority within the Library’s departmental budget in the General Fund is transferred to this fund at year‐end. The amount transferred each year fluctuates greatly; especially when personnel positions remain vacant for extended periods of time. Our estimate for the coming years of the plan are that approximately 1.9% of the annual budget will remain unspent – to be transferred to this fund. ‐ 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Estimate ‐ Average Remaining Library Budget 127 320 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The plan has made some changes that impact the projects planned in FY20. Moving up LIB26 Materials Conveyor from FY21 to FY20 would aid greatly in the efforts of creating staff efficiency. In addition, the carpet budgeted for in FY20 would make more sense to spread out over time and replace as needed rather than all at once and having to shut down the Library for a period of time. The project for repairing the parking lot has been delayed the last couple of years and money was added but prior year amounts were not rolled and in order to complete the work in FY20 there needs to be $65,000 added. These changes to FY20 would keep the fund within is approved appropriation for FY20 and the Carpet repairs are put back into the plan spread out over three years. 128 321 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # NEW CARPET IN PUBLIC AREAS 72,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DUE TO THE LIBRARY SCHEDULE THIS PROJECT WILL ‐ BE DONE OVER TIME TO AVOID A MAJOR SHUT DOWN OF ‐ THE LIBRARY. THIS WILL REPLACE THE WORN CARPET ‐ ON BOTH FLOORS AND PUBLIC AREAS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE WITH WORN CARPET OR SHUT DOWN FOR A ‐ PERIOD OF TIME AND REPLACE ALL AT ONCE. ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ NONE ‐ NEW CARPET IN PUBLIC AREAS 72,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DUE TO THE LIBRARY SCHEDULE THIS PROJECT WILL ‐ BE DONE OVER TIME TO AVOID A MAJOR SHUT DOWN OF ‐ THE LIBRARY. THIS WILL REPLACE THE WORN CARPET ‐ ON BOTH FLOORS AND PUBLIC AREAS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE WITH WORN CARPET OR SHUT DOWN FOR A ‐ PERIOD OF TIME AND REPLACE ALL AT ONCE. ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ NONE ‐ NEW CARPET IN PUBLIC AREAS 72,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DUE TO THE LIBRARY SCHEDULE THIS PROJECT WILL ‐ BE DONE OVER TIME TO AVOID A MAJOR SHUT DOWN OF ‐ THE LIBRARY. THIS WILL REPLACE THE WORN CARPET ‐ ON BOTH FLOORS AND PUBLIC AREAS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE WITH WORN CARPET OR SHUT DOWN FOR A ‐ PERIOD OF TIME AND REPLACE ALL AT ONCE. ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ NONE ‐ NEW CARPET PUBLIC AREA 2023 72,000 LIB22 (FY23) NEW CARPET PUBLIC AREA 2021 72,000 LIB22 (FY21) NEW CARPET PUBLIC AREA 2022 72,000 LIB22 (FY22) 129 322 Parking 130 323 PARKING FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 573,373 $ 743,113 $ 749,591 $ 633,535 $ 470,996 $ 202,149 Plus: Parking Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 63,800 $ 66,990 $ 70,340 $ 73,857 $ 77,550 $ 81,427 Cash In Lieu of Parking Plus: Parking Revenues Dedicated to Capital $ 70,940 $ 74,487 $ 53,604 $ 53,604 $ 53,604 $ 53,604 Plus: Downtown TIF Interest Contribution $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Plus: TIF Contribution for parking lot redesign and improv. $ 280,000 $ 170,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Less: Carryforward FY19 $ (45,000) Less: Scheduled CIP Costs (adjusted) $ (210,000) $ (315,000) $ (250,000) $ (300,000) $ (410,000) $ (300) $ ‐ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 743,113 $ 749,591 $ 633,535 $ 470,996 $ 202,149 $ 346,881 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Parking Fund Revenues $ 1,063,340 $ 1,063,340 $ 1,116,507 $ 1,172,332 $ 1,230,949 $ 1,292,496 Estimated Growth in Revenues 0% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,063,340 $ 1,116,507 $ 1,172,332 $ 1,230,949 $ 1,292,496 $ 1,357,121 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to Capital $ 63,800 $ 66,990 $ 70,340 $ 73,857 $ 77,550 $ 81,427 Projected Projected CURRENT $(315,000) $(250,000) $(300,000) $(410,000) $(300) $‐ FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED PARKING FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 131 324 PARKING FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled P001 WILLSON LOT REDESIGN ‐ ‐ 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ P012 ARMORY LOT REDESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS ‐ 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ P017 ROUSE PARKING LOT RE‐DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS 280,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ P024 BLACK LOT IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ 410,000 ‐ ‐ P025 REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 35,000 GF346 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300 ‐ FISCAL YEAR TOTALS 315,000 250,000 300,000 410,000 300 ‐ 132 325 PARKING FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND Parking Revenues are unpredictable; a large portion of the funds (roughly 50%) comes from parking enforcement (ticket/fine) revenues. Parking operations do not generate adequate revenues to fund capital replacement or expansion projects. The Parking Fund must rely heavily on the Downtown Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District to support its capital plan. The Downtown TIF is planning to contribute $1,000,000 to Parking Capital between FY19‐ FY21. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The Parking plan has the continuing the rotation of parking lot re‐design and resurfacing. $584,593.00 $647,708.63 $788,713.00 $958,379.00 $958,504.00 $787,579.53 $‐ $200,000.00 $400,000.00 $600,000.00 $800,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,200,000.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Average FY15‐ FY19 Parking Fund Revenues 133 326 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WILLSON LOT REDESIGN 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE PARKING LOT LAYOUT, SET‐BACKS, ‐ LANDSCAPING, SIGNAGE, LIGHTING, REQUIRED STORM ‐ WATER TREATMENT INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS AND ‐ PARKING KIOSK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP LOT AS IS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVED FUNCTIONING OF PARKING LOT ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL ‐ ARMORY LOT REDESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS SCHEDULED AFTER THE COMPLETION OF ‐ THE ETHA HOTEL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. LAYOUT, SET‐ ‐ BACKS, LANDSCAPING, SIGNAGE, LIGHTING, SIDEWALKS, ‐ AND STORM WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES ARE BEING ‐ PLANNED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP THE LOT AS IS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ BETTER FUNCTIONING AND SAFER PARKING LOT LAYOUT. ‐ WILL REDUCE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF UNTREATED ‐ STORMWATER RUNOFF. INCREASED REVENUE AND ‐ PARKING ASSET COORDINATION THROUGH THE ‐ IMPLEMENTATION OF PAY KIOSKS. ‐ ADD OPERTING COSTS: ‐ NEW ASPHALT WILL REQUIRE LESS MAINTENANCE, BUT ‐ PLANTINGS AND LANDSCAPING WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ WILLSON LOT REDESIGN 2023 300,000 P001 ARMORY LOT REDESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS 2022 250,000 P012 134 327 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ROUSE PARKING LOT RE‐DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS 280,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ROUSE LOT IMPROVEMENTS LAYOUT, SET‐BACKS, ‐ LANDSCAPING, SIGNAGE, LIGHTING, SIDEWALKS, AND ‐ STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS ARE SEPARATE FROM ANY CREEK ‐ RESTORATION PROJECT AND WILL ONLY INVOLVE THE ‐ SURFACE LOT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN CURRENT CONFIGURATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ BETTER FUNCTIONING AND SAFER PARKING LOT LAYOUT. ‐ INCREASED REVENUE AND PARKING ASSET ‐ COORDINATION THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ‐ PAY KIOSKS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NEW ASPHALT WILL REQUIRE LESS MAINTENANCE, BUT ‐ PLANTINGS AND LANDSCAPING WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ BLACK LOT IMPROVEMENTS 410,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE PARKING LOT LAYOUT, SET‐BACKS, ‐ LANDSCAPING, SIGNAGE, LIGHTING, REQUIRED STORM ‐ WATER TREATMENT INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS AND ‐ PARKING KIOSK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP LOT AS IS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVED FUNCTIONING OF PARKING LOT ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL ‐ 410,000 P024 BLACK LOT IMPROVEMENTS 2024 ROUSE PARKING LOT RE‐DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS 2021 280,000 P017 135 328 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 35,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE VEHICLE WITH AN ALL WHEEL DRIVE HYBRID ‐ TO AID IN EFFICIENCY FOR PARKING OFFICERS TO GET ‐ AROUND TOWN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LEASE THE VEHICLE OR BUY THE TWO‐WHEEL DRIVE FOR ‐ MINIMAL SAVINGS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MAINTENANCE ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 300 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 2021 35,000 P025 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 300 GF346 136 329 Parks & Trails Maintenance District 137 330 PARKS & TRAILS DISTRICT FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Balance Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 19,834 $ 114,964 $ 339,049 $ 641,583 Plus: P&T District Fund Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ 589,834 $ 851,130 $ 1,082,085 $ 1,240,534 $ 1,736,747 $ ‐ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ ‐ $ (570,000) $ (756,000) $ (858,000) $ (938,000) $ (2,249,600) $ (5,325,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ 19,834 $ 114,964 $ 339,049 $ 641,583 $ 128,730 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Assessment Fund Revenues $ ‐ $ 3,932,225 $ 3,932,225 $ 4,600,703 $ 5,152,788 $ 5,513,483 Estimated Growth 2% 2% 2% 2% Estimated rate increase 15% 10% 5% 3% Total Estimated P&T District Fund Revenues $ ‐ $ 3,932,225 $ 4,600,703 $ 5,152,788 $ 5,513,483 $ 5,789,157 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 0.0% 15.0% 15.0% 18.5% 21.0% 22.5% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% 2.5% 1.5% 7.5% Total % Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 15.0% 18.5% 21.0% 22.5% 30.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ 589,834 $ 851,130 $ 1,082,085 $ 1,240,534 $ 1,736,747 Projected Projected CURRENT $(570,000) $(756,000) $(858,000) $(938,000) $(2,249,600) $(5,325,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED PARKS & TRAILS DISTRICT FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 138 331 PARKS & TRAILS DISTRICT PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled GF031 PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANT ‐ ‐ 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF034 LARGE DECK MOWER ‐ 60,000 ‐ 60,000 ‐ ‐ GF084 PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES ‐ 36,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF092 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ‐ 110,000 100,000 130,000 ‐ ‐ GF108 PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS ‐ ‐ 88,000 120,000 ‐ ‐ GF115 PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 60,000 85,000 32,000 58,000 32,000 ‐ GF191 SOFTBALL LIGHTING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 GF205 PROST PLAN UPDATE 57,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF250 SPLASH PADS ‐ 360,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF260 SPORTS PARK INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ ‐ ‐ 370,000 ‐ ‐ GF270 SNOW PLOW VEHICLE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 75,000 GF290 IRRIGATION SYSTEM ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 GF291 PICKLEBALL COURTS 95,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF339 ADDITIONAL PARKING SMC 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF340 ADDITIONAL BRIDGE SMA ‐ 105,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF346 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 18,600 ‐ PTD01 LARGE DECK MOWER ‐ ‐ 60,000 ‐ 70,000 ‐ PTD02 PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES ‐ ‐ 80,000 ‐ 275,000 ‐ PTD03 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ 340,000 500,000 PTD04 PARK VEHICLES 58,000 ‐ 98,000 68,000 64,000 150,000 PTD05 TOOLCAT MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE ‐ ‐ ‐ 80,000 ‐ 80,000 PTD06 PARK SHELTER REPLACEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ 52,000 150,000 320,000 PTD07 MAINTENANCE BUILDING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 PTD08 BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300,000 500,000 PTD09 DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 500,000 Department Subtotal 570,000 756,000 858,000 938,000 2,249,600 5,325,000 139 332 PARKS & TRAILS DISTRICT DETAIL BACKGROUND The special revenue fund accounts for special assessment revenues levied, received, and expended for Parks & Trails. If the District is approved by the voters the assessments will begin in FY21 and will ramp up to the silver level of service over five years and will address over $6.9 million of deferred maintenance. The plan follows the schedule that was approve by the commission. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The capital plan includes items that are originally part of the Parks plan when included with the General fund, their numbered using GF. If the District is not created the projects numbered starting with GF will need to be funded in the General Fund plan again and going forward. The projects numbered starting with PTD are in direct relation to the District being created, taking on HOA parks, addressing deferred maintenance and working towards the silver level of service. Many of the deferred maintenance items are bridges and playgrounds that are addressed in FY23‐ FY25 of the plan. There are many items that aid in strategic plan efforts for 3.4 Active Recreation, with the addition of splashpads and pickleball courts. 140 333 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANTS DESCRIPTION: THE GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTES FUNDS TOWARDS IMPROVING PARK INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF PARK MASTER PLANS. THIS GRANT PROGRAM IS A MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM IN WHICH THE CITY RECEIVES A MINIMUM 1 TO 1 MATCH FROM THE RECIPIENT. THE COMMISSION HAS ESTABLISHED A FORMAL GRANT POLICY BY RESOLUTION. BY SWITCHING TO EVERY OTHER YEAR, AND ALSO INCREASING THE ALLOCATION, BIGGER PROJECTS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED, THOUGH THESE PROJECTS WILL TAKE MORE TIME TO COMPLETE. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: HANDLE PARK EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT REQUESTS ON AN ADHOC BASIS, AS VARIOUS DONORS OR SERVICE GROUPS BRING THEM FORWARD. ALLOCATE MORE OR FEWER DOLLARS TO THE PROGRAM. ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: THIS MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM PROVIDES CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE PARK SYSTEM BY UTILIZING THE TALENTS OF OUR COMMUNITY MEMBERS THROUGH MATCHING FUNDS, DONATIONS, LABOR IN LIEU OF AND NUMEROUS SPECIALIZED SERVICES. ALL OF THE ABOVE CAN BE USED AS A MATCH IN THIS PROGRAM. ADD OPERATING COSTS: NEW INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES BRING ON INCREASED MAINTENANCE AND LABOR COSTS. THE NATURE OF EACH PROJECT FUNDED WILL DETERMINE THE CONTINUE Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # LARGE DECK MOWER 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ADDITION TO SUPPLEMENT FLEET ‐ OF A LARGE‐DECK SPORTS TURF MOWER, ANTICIPATED TO ‐ BE NEEDED FOR ADDITIONAL PARKLAND USED FOR ‐ ATHLETICS, SUCH AS: ENTERPRISE PARK (FORMERLY ‐ LERNER PARK), OAK SPRINGS PARK, ADAM BRONKEN ‐ BOZEMAN SPORTS COMPLEX. THE CITY CURRENTLY ‐ MOWS OVER 162 ACRES OF IRRIGATED TURFGRASS WEEKLY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO REPAIR AS BREAK DOWNS OCCUR, REPLACE ‐ MOWERS AS THEY BREAKDOWN, EXPLORE A LEASE PROGRAM. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROPER MOWING OF SPORTS FIELDS AND FORMAL PARKS ‐ ARE IMPERATIVE TO SAFETY. REGULAR REPLACEMENT WILL ‐ REDUCE MAINTENANCE COSTS AND DECREASE THE ‐ NUMBER OF BREAKDOWNS WE HAVE BEEN ‐ EXPERIENCING. WELL MOWED PARKS ARE AN IMPORTANT ‐ REFLECTION ON OUR CITY AND HOW IT IS PERCEIVED BY ‐ VISITORS AND CITIZENS. NEW MOWERS WILL BE MORE ‐ RELIABLE, SAFER, PRODUCTIVE, AND WILL REDUCE TH ‐ WORKLOAD ON THE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ‐ PERSONNEL. WELL MAINTAINED SPORTS FIELDS HAVE ‐ PROVEN TO BE A VITAL COMPONENT TO THE ECONOMIC ‐ GROWTH OF OUR COMMUNITY, BY ATTRACTING REGIONAL ‐ AND STATE TOURNAMENTS TO BOZEMAN. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ IMPROVE SCHEDULING OF MOWING AND INCREASE CREW ‐ EFFICIENCY BECAUSE OF RELIABLE EQUIPMENT. ‐ LARGE DECK MOWER 2022 60,000 GF034 (FY22) 142 335 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # LARGE DECK MOWER 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ LARGE‐DECK FORMAL TURF MOWER, ANTICIPATED TO ‐ REPLACE THE OLDEST MOWER IN OUR FLEET. BY FY23‐ ‐ STORY MILL COMMUNITY PARK AND THE SPORTS COMPLEX ‐ WILL BE OPERATIONAL. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO REPAIR AS BREAK DOWNS OCCUR, ‐ REPLACE MOWERS AS THEY BREAKDOWN, EXPLORE A LEASE ‐ PROGRAM. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROPER MOWING OF SPORTS FIELDS AND FORMAL PARKS ‐ ARE IMPERATIVE TO SAFETY. REGULAR REPLACEMENT WILL ‐ REDUCE MAINTENANCE COSTS AND DECREASE THE ‐ NUMBER OF BREAKDOWNS WE HAVE BEEN ‐ EXPERIENCING. WELL MOWED PARKS ARE AN IMPORTANT ‐ REFLECTION ON OUR CITY AND HOW IT IS PERCEIVED BY ‐ VISITORS AND CITIZENS. NEW MOWERS WILL BE MORE ‐ RELIABLE, SAFER, PRODUCTIVE, AND WILL REDUCE THE ‐ WORKLOAD ON THE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ‐ PERSONNEL. WELL MAINTAINED SPORTS FIELDS HAVE ‐ PROVEN TO BE A VITAL COMPONENT TO THE ECONOMIC ‐ GROWTH OF OUR COMMUNITY, BY ATTRACTING REGIONAL ‐ AND STATE TOURNAMENTS TO BOZEMAN. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ IMPROVE SCHEDULING OF MOWING AND INCREASE CREW ‐ EFFICIENCY BECAUSE OF RELIABLE EQUIPMENT. ‐ LARGE DECK MOWER 2024 60,000 GF034 (FY24) 143 336 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARKS RESTROOM UPGRADES 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS THE GENERAL REPLACEMENT AND ‐ UPGRADING OF THE CITY PARK S PUBLIC RESTROOM ‐ FACILITIES. OTHER RESTROOMS THAT NEED TO BE ‐ REPLACED‐ AND/OR BUILT IS: ‐ ROSE PARK $34,000 (FY21) ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH PORT‐POTTIES ‐ THE ROSE PARK PROJECTS WILL PROVIDE RESTROOM ‐ FACILITIES IN AREAS WHERE CURRENTLY NONE EXIST. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EASE AND EFFICIENCY OF MAINTAINING NEW RESTROOMS; ‐ INCREASED CLEANLINESS OF PUBLIC FACILITIES. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING AND REPAIR COSTS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ‐ LOWER THAN THE EXISTING FACILITIES. ‐ REDUCED BUDGET BY 46000 DUE TO IMPLEMENTING A ‐ VAULT, SELF CONTAINED UNIT IN THE PARK. UNIT ‐ WOULD BE SIMILIAR TO THE RESTROOM AT TUCKERMAN ‐ PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES 2022 36,000 GF084 144 337 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE FOLLOWING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL ‐ EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND ‐ CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP ‐ TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND ‐ LIABILITY CONCERNS. ‐ CHRISTIE PARK (FY20) ‐ IN GENERAL, SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PLAYGROUNDS ‐ ADDRESS: PLAYGROUND SITE ELEMENTS, SIGHT LINES, ‐ EQUIPMENT FEATURES AND MATERIALS, SURFACING ‐ MATERIALS, HARDWARE, PAINTS AND FINISHES, AND ANY ‐ THER HAZARDS THAT MIGHT BE PRESENT. PLAYGROUND ‐ REPAIRS REQUIRE SAME‐DAY RESPONSE GIVEN THEIR ‐ CRITICAL SAFETY IMPLICATION. CURRENTLY, THE PARKS ‐ DIVISION INSPECTS AND MAINTAINS 22PLAYGROUNDS ‐ CITY‐WIDE AND ASSISTS WITH ANOTHER 23 HOA‐ ‐ MAINTAINED PLAYGROUNDS WITH MONTHLY ‐ INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ‐ ALTERNTAIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE ‐ GO ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL ‐ INCREASE IN PRICE 10,000 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 2022 110,000 GF092 (FY22) 145 338 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT JARRETT PARK 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE FOLLOWING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL ‐ EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND ‐ CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP ‐ TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND ‐ IN GENERAL, SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PLAYGROUNDS ‐ ADDRESS: PLAYGROUND SITE ELEMENTS, SIGHT LINES, ‐ EQUIPMENT FEATURES AND MATERIALS, SURFACING ‐ MATERIALS, HARDWARE, PAINTS AND FINISHES, AND ‐ ANY OTHER HAZARDS THAT MIGHT BE PRESENT. ‐ PLAYGROUND REPAIRS REQUIRE SAME‐DAY RESPONSE ‐ IVEN THEIR CRITICAL SAFETY IMPLICATION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE ‐ GO. ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT LINDLEY PARK 130,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE FOLLOWING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL ‐ EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND ‐ CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP ‐ TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND ‐ LIABILITY CONCERNS. ‐ LINDLEY PARK AND KIRK PARK PLAYGROUNDS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE ‐ GO. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL. ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 2024 130,000 GF092 (FY24) PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 2023 100,000 GF092 (FY23) 146 339 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS 88,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SIDEWALKS IDENTIFIED FOR REPLACEMENT DUE TO ‐ DETERIORATING CEMENT, MISSING SECTIONS AND ‐ HEAVING FROM WEATHER AND TREE ROOTS. NEW ‐ SIDEWALKS MUST MEET OR EXCEED CITY CODE. ‐ REPLACING THE OLD SIDEWALK WILL RESULT IN A SAFER ‐ SIDEWALK YEAR ROUND AND ENABLE THE SIDEWALK ‐ PLOWS TO BETTER MEET THE SNOW REMOVAL ‐ MUNICIPAL CODE. COSTS OF APPROXIMATELY $11.75 ‐ SQUARE FOOT FOR RIP AND REPLACE. ‐ PROJECT 1: $120,000 ‐ SOUTHSIDE PARK ‐ REPLACE 730 ‐ OF SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH 5TH AVENUE AND ALONG WEST ‐ ALDERSON STREET WITH NEW 6' (SIX FOOT) WIDE ‐ CONCRETE SIDEWALK, AND THE RELATED RETAINING WALL. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN EXISTING SIDEWALKS AND PATCH AND REPAIR ‐ AS NEEDED. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND ‐ EFFICIENCY OF OPERATION (PLOWING) ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NO ESTIMATE AT THIS TIME ‐ PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS 2023 88,000 GF108 (FY23) 147 340 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SIDEWALKS IDENTIFIED FOR REPLACEMENT DUE TO ‐ DETERIORATING CEMENT, MISSING SECTIONS AND ‐ HEAVING FROM WEATHER AND TREE ROOTS. NEW ‐ SIDEWALKS MUST MEET OR EXCEED CITY CODE. ‐ REPLACING THE OLD SIDEWALK WILL RESULT IN A SAFER ‐ SIDEWALK YEAR ROUND AND ENABLE THE SIDEWALK ‐ PLOWS TO BETTER MEET THE SNOW REMOVAL ‐ MUNICIPAL CODE. COSTS OF APPROXIMATELY $11.75 ‐ SQUARE FOOT FOR RIP AND REPLACE. ‐ PROJECT 2: $88,000 ‐ COOPER PARK ‐ REPLACE THE ‐ SIDEWALK AROUND THE ENTIRE BLOCK APPROXIMATELY ‐ 1875' TOTAL. THIS SIDEWALK SERVES AS A MAIN ROUTE ‐ TO AND FROM THE UNIVERSITY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN EXISTING SIDEWALKS AND PATCH AND REPAIR ‐ AS NEEDED. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND ‐ EFFICIENCY OF OPERATION (PLOWING) ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NO ESTIMATE AT THIS TIME ‐ PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS 2024 120,000 GF108 (FY24) 148 341 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ADDITION OF TWO (2) HALF TON PICKUP TRUCKS TO THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION. CURRENTLY, THE PARKS DIVISION HAS ‐ NUMEROUS VEHICLES EXCEEDING 150,000 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO OPERATE AND REPAIR EXISTING FLEET ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL AS NEW VEHICLE ‐ ARE LESS COSTLY TO REPAIR ‐ PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 85,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWER ‐ TRANSPORTING, FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION REPAIR, ‐ INSPECTIONS, SNOW PLOWING AND GENERAL ‐ REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 600+ ACRES ‐ ALL VEHICLES ARE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED ‐ DOWN‐TIME FOR EQUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME ‐ PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY IS COMPROMISED. FY22 IS ‐ EARMARKED FOR A 3/4 TON (MOWER HAULING AND WINTER ‐ PLOWING)AND A 1/2 TON FOR THE NEW FACILITIES ‐ FTE WORKING IN PARKS FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ UTILIZE OLD VEHICLES UNTIL THEY ARE "DEAD' ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES FOR PARK ‐ EMPLOYEES, BOTH FULL‐TIME AND SHORT TERM WORKERS ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THESE ARE REPLACEMENTS; RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY ‐ PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 2022 85,000 GF115 (FY22) PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 2021 60,000 GF115 (FY21) 149 342 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 32,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 600+ACRES THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. ALL VEHICLES ‐ ARE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED DOWN‐TIME FOR ‐ EQUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY ‐ IS COMPROMISED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE UTILIZING CURRENT VEHICLES ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES FOR PARK ‐ STAFF. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THESE ARE REPLACEMENTS; RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY ‐ DECLINE AS NEWER CARS REPLACE OLDER ONES. ‐ PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS ADDITIONAL 1 TON 58,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 600 ACRES THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. ALL VEHICLES ‐ RE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED DOWN‐TIME FOR ‐ EQUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY ‐ IS COMPROMISED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP OLD VEHICLES UNTIL THEY DIE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES FOR PARK ‐ USE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THESE ARE REPLACEMENTS; RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY ‐ DECLINE AS NEWER CARS REPLACE OLDER ONES. ‐ PER VEHICLE ‐ PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 2024 58,000 GF115 (FY24) PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 2023 32,000 GF115 (FY23) 150 343 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # VEHICLE REPLACEMENT‐ 1/2 TON PICK‐UP TRUCK 32,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF A 1/2 PICK‐UP TRUCK USED FOR ‐ VARIOUS PARK OPERATIONS. A NUMBER OF PARK ‐ TRUCKS HAVE EXCEEDED 160,000 MILES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO OPERATE AND REPAIR AS NEEDED ON ‐ OUR EXISTING VEHICLES ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASED COST DUE TO REPAIR AND OVERALL ‐ IMPROVED FUNCTION, LESS DOWN TIME ‐ SOFTBALL COMPLEX LIGHTING 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE THE CURRENT FIELD LIGHTS AT THE ‐ SOFTBALL COMPLEX WITH APPROPRIATE FIELD ‐ LIGHTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE THE OLD LIGHTS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EFFICIENT LED LIGHTING THAT IS DARK SKY COMPLIANT ‐ AND DOES NOT PRODUCE LIGHT POLLUTION. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ LESS THAN WITH THE CURRENT SYSTEM ‐ SOFTBALL LIGHTING UNSCHEDULED 1,200,000 GF191 PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 2025 32,000 GF115 (FY25) 151 344 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PROST PLAN UPDATE $114,000 57,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ HALF THE EXPENSE IS PAID FOR BY RECREATION. ‐ UPDATE THE 2007 PARKS RECREATION OPEN SPACE ‐ TRAIL (PROST) PLAN. THE CURRENT PLAN IS NOW 13 ‐ YEARS OLD. SINCE ADOPTION, THE CITY HAS GROWN IN ‐ SIZE, NEW PARK PROPERTIES HAVE COME INTO THE ‐ SYSTEM, AND LOCAL DEMOGRAPHICS HAVE CHANGED. ‐ THIS PROJECT ANTICIPATES HIRING AN OUTSIDE PARTY ‐ TO UPDATE THE PLAN THAT WILL TAKE INTO ‐ CONSIDERATION THE UPDATED COMMUNITY PLAN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ DO NOT UPDATE THE PLAN ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE UPDATE WOULD RECORD AND REFERENCE NEW ‐ AND ACCURATE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN ‐ DEVELOPING OVER THE LAST 13 YEARS. ‐ ANALYSIS AND 2012 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY. ‐ SPLASH PADS 330,000 360,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE INSTALLATION OF A SPLASH PAD AT SMCP ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT INSTALL SPLASH PADS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CAN HELP REDUCE CHILDREN S FEAR OF WATER. ADDS ‐ COMMUNITY WATER FEATURES THAT HAVE NO ‐ ADMITTANCE FEE ALLOWING PEOPLE OF ALL SOCIO ‐ ECONOMIC STATUS TO ENJOY A PUBLIC AQUATICS ‐ AMENITY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ SOME ADDITIONAL WATER COSTS AND MAINTENANCE ‐ WILL BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE IS ‐ ESTIMATED AT 0.2 FTE ‐ UPDATED COST ESTIMATE 30,000 PROST PLAN UPDATES 2021 57,000 GF205 SPLASH PAD‐ STORYMILL 2022 GF250 152 345 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SPORTS COMPLEX ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF 'PROJECT RELATED' 370,000 COTTONWOOD ROAD AREA WATER & WASTEWATER IMPRMTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AS OWNER OF THE SPORTS PARK PROPERTY, THE CITY IS ‐ REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT A NUMBER OF STREET, WATER, ‐ AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS. IN APPROVAL OF THE ‐ SPORTS PARK PURCHASE, $1,778,000 WAS APPROVED ‐ IN TOP BOND FUNDING FOR THESE INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS: BAXTER LANE, COTTONWOOD ROAD, ‐ DURSTON/COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION, FLANDERS MILL ‐ ROAD (INCLUDING DITCH), AND OAK STREET. WE ‐ ESTIMATE THAT THE BOND FUNDING WILL NOT BE ‐ SUFFICIENT TO COVER THE COTTONWOOD ROAD (OR OAK ‐ STREET) IMPROVEMENTS. WE ANTICIPATE NEEDING TO ‐ BUILD THE PROJECT‐RELATED PORTIONS OF THE ‐ COTTONWOOD ROAD STREET‐RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ‐ WITH ARTERIAL &AMP; COLLECTOR DISTRICT DOLLARS. ‐ THE RELATED WATER AND SEWER‐LINE IMPROVEMENTS ‐ WILL NEED TO COME FROM THE GENERAL FUND. OUR ‐ ORIGINAL COST ESTIMATES FROM THE SPRING OF 2014 ‐ HAVE BEEN INCREASED BY 15% TO ESTIMATE ‐ CONSTRUCTION INFLATION COSTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DELAY THE IMPROVEMENTS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADJACENT STREET, WATER, ‐ AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, IN CONCERT WITH OUR ‐ DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. BETTER ACCESS AND ‐ AMENITIES FOR THE SPORTS PARK. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE CITY'S STREET MAINTENANCE FUNDS WILL MAINTAIN ‐ THE STREET SURFACE, ONCE CONSTRUCTED. THE ‐ UTILITIES WILL MAINTAIN THE PIPES ONCE INSTALLED. ‐ SPORTS COMPLEX 2024 370,000 GF260 153 346 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TOOLCAT 75,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ MULTI‐PURPOSE MACHINE USED FOR TRAIL WORK, SNOW ‐ REMOVAL FROM SIDEWALKS AND VARIOUS PARK‐ ‐ RELATED TASKS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUED USE OF THE OLDER TOOLCATS AND REPAIR AS NEEDED. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL COMPARED WITH UTILIZING AND REPAIRING ‐ OLDER EQUIPMENT. ‐ IRRIGATION SYSTEM UPGRADES 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE OLD AND OUTDATED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ‐ THROUGHOUT THE CITY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO IRRIGATE WITH THE OLD SYSTEMS AND ‐ REPAIR THEM AS NEEDED. ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EFFICIENT AND UPDATED SYSTEMS THAT MONITOR ET ‐ RATES, SHUT DOWN WHEN RAINING AND ARE IN LINE ‐ WITH THE CITY'S WATER CONSERVATION EFFORTS. ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REDUCED DRAMATICALLY WITH NEW SYSTEMS THAT ‐ TAKE ADVANTAGE OF TODAY'S TECHNOLOGY TO ‐ REDUCE WATER USAGE AND LABOR ‐ PICKLEBALL COURTS 95,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALL PICKLEBALL COURTS IN ONE OF OUR CITY PARKS ‐ ONE POTENTIAL SITE WOULD BE BOGERT PARK TENNIS ‐ COURTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT INSTALL PICKLEBALL COURTS AND CONTINUE ‐ TO UTILIZE SOUTHSIDE TENNIS COURTS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SEPARATE THE INCREASING NUMBER OF PICKLEBALL ‐ PLAYERS FROM THE TENNIS PLAYERS. DEDICATED SPACE ‐ FOR A FAST GROWING SPORT ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RESURFACING OR RE‐PAINTING IN FUTURE YEARS. ‐ IRRIGATION SYSTEM UNSCHEDULED 1,000,000 GF290 PICKLEBALL COURTS 2021 95,000 GF291 SNOWPLOW UNSCHEDULED 75,000 GF270 154 347 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ADDITIONAL PARKING LOT AT STORYMILL PARK 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITIONAL ‐ PARKING LOT AHEAD OF THE SPLASH PAD INSTALLATION ‐ CURRENTLY, THE EXISTING PARKING LOT IS FULL DURING ‐ MOST SUMMER DAYS, THIS IS WITHOUT BOZEMAN'S FIRST ‐ SPLASH PAD OR PARK RESERVATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ UTILIZE THE EXISTING PARKING LOT AND RECOGNIZE ‐ THAT PARKING WILL BE ON A FIRST COME ‐FIRST SERVE ‐ OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL LOT CLEAN UP AND POTENTIALLY PLOWING. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ RESURFACING OR RE‐PAINTING IN FUTURE YEARS. ‐ ADDITIONAL BRIDGE @ STORYMILL 105,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALLATION OF AN ENGINEERED BRIDGE AT SMCP ‐ THIS BRIDGE WILL CONNECT THE TRIANGLE PARCEL ‐ (DOG PARK AREA) WITH THE NORTHERN PARCEL ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO OPERATE WITHOUT THE ADDITIONAL BRIDGE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EFFICIENCY IN TRANSPORTATION, INCREASED SAFETY IN ‐ TRAVEL. ‐ COST OF OPERATION: ‐ MINIMAL BRIDGE MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADDITIONAL PARKING SMC 2021 300,000 GF339 ADDITIONAL BRIDGE SMC 2022 105,000 GF340 155 348 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 18,600 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ LARGE DECK MOWER 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ LARGE‐DECK FORMAL TURF MOWER, ANTICIPATED TO ‐ ADJUST TO TAKING OVER HOA PARKS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO CONTRACT SERVICES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS ‐ LARGE DECK MOWER 70,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ LARGE‐DECK FORMAL TURF MOWER, ANTICIPATED TO ‐ ADJUST TO TAKING OVER HOA PARKS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO CONTRACT SERVICES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS ‐ LARGE DECK MOWER 2023 60,000 PTD01 (FY23) LARGE DECK MOWER 2025 70,000 PTD01 (FY25) FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 18,600 GF346 156 349 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARKS RESTROOM UPGRADES 80,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS THE GENERAL REPLACEMENT AND ‐ UPGRADING OF THE CITY PARK S PUBLIC RESTROOM ‐ FACILITIES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PORT‐POTTIES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING AND REPAIR COSTS ARE EXPECTED ‐ PARKS RESTROOM UPGRADES 275,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS THE GENERAL REPLACEMENT AND ‐ UPGRADING OF THE CITY PARK S PUBLIC RESTROOM ‐ FACILITIES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PORT‐POTTIES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING AND REPAIR COSTS ARE EXPECTED ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL ‐ EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND ‐ CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP ‐ TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND ‐ LIABILITY CONCERNS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE ‐ GO. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL. ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 2023 250,000 PTD03 (FY23) PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES 2023 80,000 PTD02 (FY23) PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES 2025 275,000 PTD02 (FY25) 157 350 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 340,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL ‐ EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND ‐ CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP ‐ TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND ‐ LIABILITY CONCERNS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE ‐ GO. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL. ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL ‐ EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND ‐ CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP ‐ TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND ‐ LIABILITY CONCERNS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE ‐ GO. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL. ‐ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT UNSCHEDULED 500,000 PTD03 (UNSCHEDULED) PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 2025 340,000 PTD03 (FY25) 158 351 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK VEHICLES 58,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 500 ACRES THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. ALL VEHICLES ‐ ARE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED DOWN‐TIME FOR ‐ EQUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY ‐ IS COMPROMISED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK VEHICLES 98,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 500 ACRES THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. NEW STAFF WILL BE ‐ COMING ONLINE WITH THE DISTRICT RAMP UP PLAN TO ‐ SILVER LEVEL OF SERVICES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK VEHICLES 2023 98,000 PTD04 (FY23) PARK VEHICLES 2021 58,000 PTD04 (FY21) 159 352 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK VEHICLES 68,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 500 ACRES THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. NEW STAFF WILL BE ‐ COMING ONLINE WITH THE DISTRICT RAMP UP PLAN TO ‐ SILVER LEVEL OF SERVICES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK VEHICLES 64,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 500 ACRES THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. NEW STAFF WILL BE ‐ COMING ONLINE WITH THE DISTRICT RAMP UP PLAN TO ‐ SILVER LEVEL OF SERVICES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK VEHICLES 2024 68,000 PTD04 (FY24) PARK VEHICLES 2025 64,000 PTD04 (FY25) 160 353 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK VEHICLES 150,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND WILL CONTINUE TO GROW THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. NEW STAFF WILL BE ‐ COMING ONLINE WITH THE DISTRICT RAMP UP PLAN TO ‐ SILVER LEVEL OF SERVICE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ TOOLCAT MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE 80,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND WILL CONTINUE TO GROW THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. NEW STAFF WILL BE ‐ COMING ONLINE WITH THE DISTRICT RAMP UP PLAN TO ‐ SILVER LEVEL OF SERVICE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ TOOLCAT MULTI PURPOSE 2024 80,000 PTD05 (FY24) PARK VEHICLES UNSCHEDULED 150,000 PTD04 (UNSCHEDULED) 161 354 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TOOLCAT MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE 80,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING, ‐ FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW ‐ PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY ‐ PARKLAND WILL CONTINUE TO GROW THAT THE ‐ PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. NEW STAFF WILL BE ‐ COMING ONLINE WITH THE DISTRICT RAMP UP PLAN TO ‐ SILVER LEVEL OF SERVICE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK SHELTER REPLACEMENT 52,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACING AGING STRUCTURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ REMOVE STRUCTURE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PARK AMENITY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK SHELTER REPLACEMENT 150,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACING AGING STRUCTURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ REMOVE STRUCTURE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PARK AMENITY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK SHELTER REPLACEMENT 2024 52,000 PTD06 (FY24) PARK SHELTER REPLACEMENT 2025 150,000 PTD06 (FY25) TOOLCAT MULTI PURPOSE UNSCHEDULED 80,000 PTD05 (UNSCHEDULED) 162 355 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PARK SHELTER REPLACEMENT 320,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACING AGING STRUCTURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ REMOVE STRUCTURE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PARK AMENITY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ BUILDING OT HOUSE GROWING EQUIPMENT FOR ADDITIONAL ‐ PARKS, STAFF AND LEVEL OF SERVICES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LEASE A SPACE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACING AGING STRUCTURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ REMOVE STRUCTURE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PARK OR TRAIL AMENITY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACING AGING STRUCTURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ REMOVE STRUCTURE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PARK OR TRAIL AMENITY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS 2025 300,000 PTD08 (FY25) BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS UNSCHEDULED 500,000 PTD08 (UNSCHEDULED) PARK SHELTER REPLACEMENT UNSCHEDULED 320,000 PTD06 (UNSCHEDULED) MAINTENANCE BUILDING UNSCHEDULED 1,000,000 PTD07 (UNSCHEDULED) 163 356 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PLACEHOLDER FOR HOW WE IMPLEMENT THE DISTRICT ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PLACEHOLDER FOR HOW WE IMPLEMENT THE DISTRICT ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE UNSCHEDULED 500,000 PTD09 (UNSCHEDULED) DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 2025 1,000,000 PTD09 (FY25) 164 357 Public Works Admin 165 358 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION INTERNAL SERVICE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ 16,516 $ 869 $ 869 $ 869 $ 1,908 $ ‐ Plus: $ 91,516 $ 149,353 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 66,040 $ ‐ $ ‐ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (75,000) $ (165,000) $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (65,000) $ ‐ $ (850,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 16,516 $ 869 $ 869 $ 869 $ 1,908 $ 1,908 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Public Works allocation $ 3,050,518 $ 3,050,518 $ 3,111,528 $ 3,173,759 $ 3,237,234 $ 3,301,979 Estimated Annual Increase 0.0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Total Estimated Revenues $ 3,050,518 $ 3,111,528 $ 3,173,759 $ 3,237,234 $ 3,301,979 $ 3,368,018 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Water Capacity Expansion CIP 0.0% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 3.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 91,516 $ 149,353 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 66,040 $ ‐ Note: The Public Works Administration Fund is an internal service fund that operates entirely from cost recovery paid by City Departments, specifically Public Works Departments. Capital items are funded as needed, without the accumulation of any reserve. Projected Projected CURRENT $(165,000) $‐ $‐ $(65,000) $‐ FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 PUBLIC WORKS INTERNAL SERVICE PROJECTS 166 359 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION INTERNAL SERVICE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project #Project Name FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025Unscheduled GIS04 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 65,000 ‐ ‐ 65,000 GIS16 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM INVESTMENTS 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF277 ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 600,000 PWAD01 PW Cost Acct & Fleet SW ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 Fiscal Year totals 190,000 ‐ ‐ 65,000 ‐ 850,000 167 360 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION INTERNAL SERVICE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND Public Works Administration internal service fund was created in FY19 to allocate the Public Works Administration, GIS, and Engineering to the enterprise funds based on the use of these functions. The charges to the other funds provides the funding for the three divisions. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The plan contains requests for GIS. This includes aerial photography and performance management and civic engagement system investment, which all work towards the Strategic Plan 4.1 c GIS Land Use & Infrastructure Development Tracking, 7.4 a Develop Data Analysis Tools, and 7.4c Analyze and Collect Data from Performance Measures. 168 361 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 65,000 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IS USED ON A DAILY BASIS TO ‐ SUPPORT A WIDE VARIETY OF CITY OPERATIONS, ‐ INCLUDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO HISTORICAL ARCHIVES. ‐ CURRENT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY ENABLES TIMELY ‐ DECISIONS BASED ON ACCURATE INFORMATION AND ‐ CONTINUES TO EXPERIENCE UNPRECEDENTED DEMAND. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LOWER RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGERY ALONG WITH ‐ EXTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS MAY RESULT IN A LESS ‐ DESIRABLE OUTCOME. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT BENEFITS BOTH THE ORGANIZATION AND ‐ THE COMMUNITY BY PROVIDING A CLEAR AND ACCURATE ‐ REPRESENTATION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS IN ADDITION ‐ TO SERVING AS AN IMPORTANT HISTORICAL RECORD ‐ DURING TIMES OF HIGH GROWTH. MEASURESMENTS AND ‐ LAND USE DETERMINATIONS CAN BE MADE WITHOUT ‐ REQUIRING EXTENSIVE TIME IN THE FIELD. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THERE ARE NO RECURRING COSTS OR ANNUAL OPERATING ‐ EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT. ‐ AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 2021 65,000 GIS04 (FY21) 169 362 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 65,000 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IS USED ON A DAILY BASIS TO ‐ SUPPORT A WIDE VARIETY OF CITY OPERATIONS, ‐ INCLUDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO HISTORICAL ARCHIVES. ‐ CURRENT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY ENABLES TIMELY ‐ DECISIONS BASED ON ACCURATE INFORMATION AND ‐ CONTINUES TO EXPERIENCE UNPRECEDENTED DEMAND. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LOWER RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGERY ALONG WITH ‐ EXTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS MAY RESULT IN A LESS ‐ DESIRABLE OUTCOME. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT BENEFITS BOTH THE ORGANIZATION AND ‐ THE COMMUNITY BY PROVIDING A CLEAR AND ACCURATE ‐ REPRESENTATION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS IN ADDITION ‐ TO SERVING AS AN IMPORTANT HISTORICAL RECORD ‐ DURING TIMES OF HIGH GROWTH. MEASUREMENTS AND ‐ LAND USE DETERMINTATIONS CAN BE MADE WITHOUT ‐ REQUIRING EXTENSIVE TIME IN THE FIELD. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THERE ARE NO RECURRING COSTS OR ANNUAL OPERATING ‐ EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT. ‐ AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 2024 65,000 GIS04 (FY24) 170 363 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 100,000 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT ARE ‐ LISTED AS HIGH PRIORITIES WITHIN THE STRATEGIC ‐ PLAN (7.4 & 1.1, RESPECTIVELY). THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL LEVERAGE EXISTING INVESTMENTS IN CITYWORKS, ‐ GIS AND OTHER ENTEPRISE SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE THE ‐ WAY WE MEASURE AND REPORT PROGRESS. A MODERN ‐ SOFTWARE PLATFORM ALONG WITH IMPLEMENTATION ‐ SERVICES ARE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A CITYWIDE ‐ APPROACH. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CUSTOM SOLUTIONS DEVELOPED USING BASIC ‐ TECHNOLOGY WILL LIMIT THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ‐ MEET STAFF AND CITIZEN EXPECTATIONS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE USE OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS WILL HELP ‐ IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES FOR INCREASED EFFICENCY ‐ THROUGHOUT THE ORGANZIATION WHILE PROVIDING A ‐ INCREASE: $25,000 WAS ADDED FOR IMPLEMENTATION ‐ SERVICES. 25,000 ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE 600,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ POSSIBLE EXAMINATION OF CURRENT ERP SYSTEM FOR ‐ CURRENT VENDOR UPGRADE OR NEW SYSTEM ‐ ALTERNATIVE: ‐ KEEP SAME SYSTEM UNTIL UNSUPPORTED ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ USUALLY ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ FUNDING SPLIT: GF 35% PWADMIN 50% AND CD 15% ‐ PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM INVESTMENTS 2021 125,000 GIS16 ERP REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE UNSCHEDULED GF277 $ 600,000 171 364 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PUBLIC WORKS INTEGRATED COST‐ACCOUNTING & FLEET 250,000 MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS SOFTWARE WOULD INTEGRATE WITH OUR CURRENT ‐ WITH THE CITY'S ERP SYSTEM TO PROVIDE PUBLIC WORKS ‐ MORE TOOLS TO BECOME MORE EFFICIENT AND ‐ EFFECTIVE IN SERVING THE COMMUNITY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE KEEP STATUS QUO ‐ ADD OPERATING: ‐ ANNUAL SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE CHARGES ‐ PWAD01 PUBLIC WORKS INTEGRATED COST‐ACCOUNTING & FLEET UNSCHEDULED $ 250,000 172 365 Solid Waste 173 366 SOLID WASTE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 740,456 $ 145,308 $ 427,154 $ 682,994 $ 485,868 $ 896,857 $ ‐ Plus: Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 624,852 $ 649,846 $ 675,840 $ 702,874 $ 730,989 $ 760,228 $ ‐ Less: FY19 Carryover Capital $ (330,000) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (890,000) $ (368,000) $ (420,000) $ (900,000) $ (320,000) $ (303,075) $ ‐ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 145,308 $ 427,154 $ 682,994 $ 485,868 $ 896,857 $ 1,354,010 $ ‐ Assumptions are made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Revenues $ 4,165,681 $ 4,165,681 $ 4,332,308 $ 4,505,601 $ 4,685,825 $ 4,873,258 Estimated Annual Increase in Revenues 0.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Total Estimated Revenues $ 4,165,681 $ 4,332,308 $ 4,505,601 $ 4,685,825 $ 4,873,258 $ 5,068,188 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 13.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 624,852 $ 649,846 $ 675,840 $ 702,874 $ 730,989 $ 760,228 Projected Projected CURRENT $(368,000) $(420,000) $(900,000) $(320,000) $(303,075) $‐ FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED SOLID WASTE PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 174 367 SOLID WASTE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled SW45 TOTE DELIVERY TRUCK 38,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SW48 TROMMEL SCREEN ‐ 200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SW50 SIDE LOAD TRUCK ‐ ‐ 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SW51 SIDE LOAD TRUCK‐ RECYCLING ‐ ‐ 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SW52 SIDE LOAD TRUCK‐ REPLACEMENT 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SW54 PICKUP TRUCK 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SW56 FRONT LOAD TRUCK ‐ ‐ 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SW57 ROLL‐OFF TRUCK ‐ 220,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SW58 ROLL‐OFF TRUCK ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ ‐ SW59 RATE STUDY ‐ ‐ ‐ 70,000 ‐ ‐ SW60 SIDE LOAD TRUCK‐ GARBAGE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300,000 ‐ GF346 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,075 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 368,000 420,000 900,000 320,000 303,075 ‐ 175 368 SOLID WASTE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The City’s Solid Waste Fund is an enterprise fund that accounts for the garbage and recycling services. Revenues are comprised of solid waste and recycling fees. Solid Waste Fund revenues have averaged growth of 9.2% per year over the past 5 years. The capital plan estimates future revenues at 5% for the next 5 years. $2,956,655.00 $3,238,853.00 $3,613,721.00 $3,926,123.00 $4,228,101.00 $3,592,690.60 $‐ $500,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $3,500,000.00 $4,000,000.00 $4,500,000.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Average FY15‐ FY19 Solid Waste Revenue History 176 369 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY This Capital Plan is for the equipment and capital needs of the Solid Waste Fund. The plan has very few changes from last year, one adjust was made based on our most recent rate study SW56 Front Load Truck two years to FY23 from FY21. This vehicle is a commercial vehicle and the rate study pointed out the need for commercial services to fund itself. As we implement the two years of recommended commercial rate increase we should be able to better fund this equipment with commercial revenue rather than residential. In addition, the fifth year is adding a side load garbage truck which is a replacement truck following the 6‐year rotation. 177 370 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TOTE DELIVERY TRUCK 38,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS TRUCK IS A REPLACEMENT FOR AN EXISTING TOTE ‐ DELIVERY TRUCK. THIS TRUCK IS CRITICAL IN THE ‐ EXECUTION OF CONTAINER MANAGEMENT. TOTES NEED TO ‐ BE DELIVERED TO NEW CUSTOMERS, EXCHANGE OF TOTES ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND REMOVAL OF TOTES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LEASING A TRUCK ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE SOLID WASTE DIVISON CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER, ‐ EXCHANGE AND REMOVE CUSTOMER TOTE REQUESTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS $1,000/YEAR ‐ TROMMEL SCREEN 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ A SCREEN THAT CAN SEPARATE OUT GARBAGE FROM ‐ FINISHED COMPOST AND SEPARATE THE SIZE OF COMPOST. ‐ THIS IS THE FINAL STAGE OF THE COMPOSTING PROCESS ‐ THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY UNABLE TO ACCOMPLISH USING ‐ EXISTING EQUIPMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ RENTAL OF THIS EQUIPMENT IS NOT AVAIABLE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE SOLID WASTE DIVISON CAN MARKET THE FINISHED ‐ COMPOST PRODUCT ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: N/A ‐ TOTE DELIVERY TRUCK 2021 38,000 SW45 TROMMEL SCREEN 2022 SW48 200,000 178 371 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SIDE LOAD TRUCK 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS SIDE LOAD TRUCK IS CRITICAL TO COMPLETE ‐ ESIDENTIAL GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICE. AS PER THE ‐ APPROVED 6 YEAR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE, GARBAGE ‐ TRUCK, ASSET # 3839, WILL BE PLACED AS BACKUP ‐ TRUCK FOR THE DIVISION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LEASING A SIDE LOAD TRUCK ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ RELIABLE EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE ROUTES COMPLETED IN ‐ AN EFFICIENT MANNER. MAINTENANCE COSTS OF NEW ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOWER. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS $30,000 ‐ SIDE LOAD TRUCK ‐ RECYCLING 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS SIDE LOAD TRUCK IS CRITICAL TO COMPLETE ‐ RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL RECYCLING COLLECTION ‐ SERVICE. AS PER THE APPROVED 6 YEAR REPLACEMENT ‐ SCHEDULE, RECYCLING TRUCK, ASSET #3838, WILL BE ‐ PLACED AS A BACKUP TRUCK FOR THE DIVISION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LEASING A SIDE LOAD TRUCK ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ RELIABLE EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE ROUTES COMPLETED IN ‐ AN EFFICIENT MANNER. MAINTENANCE COSTS OF NEW ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOWER. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS $30,000 ‐ SIDE LOAD TRUCK 2023 300,000 SW50 SIDE LOAD TRUCK‐ RECYCLING 2023 SW51 300,000 179 372 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SIDE LOAD TRUCK REPLACEMENT 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS SIDE LOAD TRUCK IS CRITICAL TO COMPLETE ‐ RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICE. AS PER THE ‐ APPROVED 6 YEAR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE, GARBAGE ‐ TRUCK, ASSET #3746, WILL BE PLACED AS A BACKUP ‐ TRUCK FOR THE DIVISION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LEASE A SIDE LOAD TRUCK ‐ ADVANTAGES TO APPROVAL: ‐ RELIABLE EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE ROUTES COMPLETED IN ‐ N EFFICIENT MANNER. MAINTENANCE COSTS OF NEWER ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOWER. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS $30,000 ‐ PROJECT: PICKUP TRUCK. 30,000 DESCRIPTION: PICKUP TRUCK TO PERFORM VARIOUS ‐ SOLID WASTE FUNCTIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: LEASING PICKUP. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ALLOW STAFF TO PERFORM JOB ‐ FUNCTIONS. ‐ OPERATING COST:$2,000.00 ANNUALLY. ‐ PROJECT:ADD FRONT LOAD TRUCK (ADDITIONAL ROUTE) 300,000 DESCRIPTION: FRONT LOAD GARBAGE TRUCK USED IN ‐ THE COLLECTION OF COMMERCIAL TRASH ‐ ALTERATIVE CONSIDERED: LEASING OF FRONT LOAD TRUCK ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL ‐ TO THE OPERATION OF THE SOLID WASTE DIVISION ‐ CUSTOMERS DEPEND ON REFUSE REMOVAL ON THEIR ‐ COLLECTION DAY RELIABLE EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE ROUTES ‐ COMPLETED IN AN EFFICIENT MANNER. MAINTENANCE ‐ COST OF NEW EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOWER. ‐ OPERATING COST:$10,000 ANNUALLY ‐ SIDE LOAD TRUCK‐ REPLACEMENT 2021 300,000 SW52 SW54 PICKUP TRUCK 2021 30,000 300,000 SW56 FRONT LOAD TRUCK 2021 180 373 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PROJECT: NEW ROLL ‐ OFF HOOK TRUCK 220,000 DESCRIPTION: ROLL ‐ OFF TRUCK IN CONJUNCTION ‐ WITH ROLL OFF CONTAINERS ARE USED TO HAUL LARGE ‐ QUANTITIES OF REFUSE FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES, OR ‐ HOME REMODELS/CLEANOUTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: LEASING TRUCK ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ALLOW THE SWD TO KEEP UP ‐ WITH THE DEMAND FOR ROLL OFFS AND TO BE ABLE TO ‐ SERVICE OUR CUSTOMERS IN A TIMLEY MANOR. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: $6000.00 ANNUALLY ‐ PROJECT: ROLL OFF HOOK TRUCK. 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ROLL OFF TRUCK IN CONJUNCTION WITH ‐ ROLL OFF CONTAINERS ARE USED TO HAUL LARGE ‐ QUANTITIES OF REFUSE FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES, OR ‐ HOME REMODELS/CLEANOUTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: LEASING TRUCK. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ALLOW THE SWD TO KEEP UP ‐ WITH THE DEMAND FOR ROLL OFFS, AND TO BE ABLE TOO ‐ SERVICE OUR CUSTOMERS IN A TIMLEY MANOR. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: $6000.00 ANNUALLY. ‐ PROJECT: RATE STUDY. 70,000 DESCRIPTION:SOLID WASTE RATE STUDY INCLUDING AN ‐ ANALYSIS OF REVENUE REQUIREMENTS, FUNDING ‐ DEPRECIATION, AND COST RECOVERY BY CUSTOMER CLASS ‐ ALTERATIVES CONSIDERED:CONTINUE WITH CURRENT RATES ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: CUSTOMERS WILL BE ‐ APPROPRIATELY CHARGED FOR THEIR GARBAGE AND ‐ RECYCLING SERVICES. FULL COST ACCOUNTING, RATES ‐ BASED ON COST OF SERVICES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: N/A ‐ ROLL‐OFF TRUCK SW57 SW59 RATE STUDY 2022 2024 2024 70,000 250,000 220,000 ROLL‐OFF TRUCK SW58 181 374 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SIDE LOAD TRUCK 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS SIDE LOAD TRUCK IS CRITICAL TO COMPLETE ‐ RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICE. AS PER THE APPROVED 6 YEAR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE, GARBAGE TRUCK ASSET #4250 WILL BE PLACED AS BACKUP TRUCK FOR THE DIVISION. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: LEASING A SIDE LOAD TRUCK ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ RELIABLE EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE ROUTES COMPLETED IN ‐ AN EFFICIENT MANNER, MAINTENANCE COST OF NEW ‐ EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOWER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST $30,000 ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 3,075 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ SIDE LOAD TRUCK‐ GARBAGE 2025 300,000 SW60 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 3,075 GF346 182 375 Stormwater 183 376 STORM WATER FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 435,538 $ 133,526 $ 1,928 $ 30,403 $ 70,551 $ 129,207 Plus: Storm Water Utility Fees Dedicated to Capital $ 665,283 $ 768,402 $ 733,475 $ 770,148 $ 808,656 $ 849,089 Less: FY19 Carryover Capital $ (317,295) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (650,000) $ (900,000) $ (705,000) $ (730,000) $ (750,000) $ (770,000) $ (605,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 133,526 $ 1,928 $ 30,403 $ 70,551 $ 129,207 $ 208,296 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Storm Water Utility Revenue $ 1,478,407 $ 1,478,407 $ 1,552,327 $ 1,629,944 $ 1,711,441 $ 1,797,013 Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Attributed to Growth 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Rate Increase 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,478,407 $ 1,552,327 $ 1,629,944 $ 1,711,441 $ 1,797,013 $ 1,886,864 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 45.0% 45.0% 49.5% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital 0.0% 4.5% ‐4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 45.0% 49.5% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 665,283 $ 768,402 $ 733,475 $ 770,148 $ 808,656 $ 849,089 Projected Projected $(650,000) $(900,000) $(705,000) $(730,000) $(750,000) $(770,000) $(605,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED STORM WATER PROJECTS 184 377 STORM WATER FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled STDM03 DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE PH2 350,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM04 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG ‐ 325,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM05 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REH ‐ 45,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM06 N 9TH DITCH REHAB ‐ ‐ 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM07 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG ‐ ‐ 560,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM08 UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI ‐ ‐ 45,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM09 MIDDLE CREEK DITCH REHAB ‐ ‐ ‐ 175,000 ‐ ‐ STDM10 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG ‐ ‐ ‐ 530,000 475,000 ‐ STDM11 UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI ‐ ‐ ‐ 45,000 45,000 ‐ STOP02 STORMWATER RATE STUDY 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STOP03 STORMWATER VEHICLE ‐ 35,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STOP04 PIPE INSPECTION VAN ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ STOP05 STREET SWEEPER 200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STOP06 STORMWATER VEHICLE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 35,000 STOP07 STORMWATER SVC VEHICLE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 STOP08 VACUUM & JETTING TRUCK ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 520,000 STOS01 SEDIMENT DISP FAC RD RPR ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STRH01 DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH3 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STRH02 DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH4 ‐ 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fiscal Year totals 900,000 705,000 730,000 750,000 770,000 605,000 185 378 STORM WATER FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The City’s Storm Water Fund is an enterprise fund that is funded primarily through Stormwater utility charges. These monthly charges are based on the impervious area of a lot. Fiscal year 2017 revenues represent the first fiscal year where our rate‐model is fully implement for all 12 months. The changes in revenues over the past 5 years have been driven by our implementation of the full rate model. We are basing our FY21‐25 revenue estimates on annual customer growth of 3% per year and estimating a 2% rate increase to keep up with inflation. Actual revenues should grow depending on the mix of impervious areas/existing infrastructure use as property is annexed and developed and the slight increase of rates if approved. $453,483 $943,621 $1,293,941 $1,324,463 $1,349,678 $1,073,037 $‐ $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 2015 2016 First year full rate 2017 2018 2019 Average FY15‐ FY19 StormWater Revenue 186 379 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY This year the Stormwater Division has added equipment replacements and has adjusted amounts to projects. The plan has mainly had a $650,000 annual capital expense and the program is finding there needs to be more. The rate increase in FY20 aids in funding this adjustment along with an inflation rate increase. There are some large projects on the horizon with STDM03 Downtown Trunk Line Rehabilitation (Phase 2) is the rehabilitation of approximately 1,500 feet of 100‐year‐old brick storm sewer pipe and STRH02 Downtown Mechanical Stormwater Treatment (Phase 4) that is the installation of two stormwater treatment units designed to collect over 27‐tons of pollutants annually. We have a Stormwater rate study planned in FY21 (STOP03), which is a completion of a cost of service and utility rate study to help align operational, regulatory, and capital needs with future rate adjustments. A large equipment is scheduled in FY21 as well STOP05 Street Sweeper (#01) that is a replacement of a mechanical street sweeper leased in 2015, which has reached the end of its operational life. 187 380 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 350,000 DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE REHABILITATION (PHASE 2) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REHABILITATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET OF 100‐ ‐ YEAR OLD BRICK STORM SEWER PIPE BENEATH THE ALLEY ‐ LOCATED BETWEEN E MAIN ST AND E MENDENHALL STREET. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S STORM SEWER NETWORK. DELAY WILL INCREASE ‐ CHANGES OF COLLAPSE, ROAD FAILURE, FLOODING, AND ‐ TOTAL REPLACEMENT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS PREVENTATIVE AND TARGETS ‐ VULNERABLE INFRASTRUCTURE PRONE TO FAILURE. ‐ COMPLETION WILL MITIGATE THE RISKS AND EXTEND THE ‐ ASSET'S LIFE CYCLE 50‐75 YEARS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ A REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, INCLUDING FLUSHING, ‐ VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE PH2 2021 350,000 STDM03 188 381 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 325,000 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REHABILITATION OF 2,000 FEET OF 100‐YEAR OLD ‐ VITRIFIED CLAY STORM SEWER, WHICH HAS EXCEEDED ITS ‐ LIFE CYCLE, DOES NOT MEET CAPACITY STANDARDS, AND ‐ INCLUDES MANY STRUCTURAL FAILURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S STORM SEWER NETWORK. DELAY WILL INCREASE ‐ CHANCES OF COLLAPSE, ROAD FAILURE, AND FLOODING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS PREVENTATIVE AND TARGETS PIPES ‐ PRONE TO FAILURE AND SURCHARING. REHABILITATION ‐ WILL REDUCE RISKS BY ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL AND ‐ CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ A REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, INCLUDING FLUSHING, ‐ VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG 2022 325,000 STDM04 189 382 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 45,000 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REHABILITATION & DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ANNUAL PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF UNPLANNED PIPE, ‐ DRAINAGE, AND TREATMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE OF INTERNAL CREWS AND EQUIPMENT TO COMPLETE ‐ WORK. STAFF DETERMINED THE WORKLOAD REQUIRED WOULD ‐ REDUCE CAPACITY APPLIED TOWARD CRITICAL SERVICES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOW STAFF TO BE RESPONSIVE TO ‐ ESSENTIAL NEEDS, INCREASING CUSTOMER SERVICE, ‐ IMPROVING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY, AND REDUCING CITY ‐ LIABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE THE MAINTENANCE ‐ OF REHABILITATED, REPAIRED, OR NEW INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ CONCURRENTLY WITH EXISTING PUBLIC ASSETS. ‐ ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REH 2022 45,000 STDM05 190 383 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 125,000 NORTH 9TH AVENUE DITCH REHABILITATION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REHABILITATION OF 900 FEET OF CONVEYANCE DITCH ‐ LOCATED NEAR N 9TH AVE FROM W VILLARD ST TO W ‐ PEACH ST, WHICH HAS SEDIMENT BUILDUP, OVERGROWN ‐ VEGETATION, AND BANK EROSION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S STORM SEWER NETWORK. DELAY WILL RESULT IN ‐ AN INCREASED CHANCE OF ADJACENT PROPERTY FLOODING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE TARGETED DITCH IS INCREASINGLY PRONE TO ‐ BACKUPS AND FLOODING. REHABILITATION WILL REDUCE ‐ RISKS BY ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL AND CAPACITY ‐ DEFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ A REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, INCLUDING INSPECTION AND ‐ CLEARING. ‐ N 9TH DITCH REHAB 2023 125,000 STDM06 191 384 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 560,000 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (FY23) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REHABILITATION OF 3,000 FEET OF 100‐YEAR OLD ‐ VITRIFIED CLAY STORM SEWER, WHICH HAS EXCEEDED ITS ‐ LIFE CYCLE, DOES NOT MEET CAPACITY STANDARDS, AND ‐ INCLUDES MANY STRUCTURAL FAILURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S STORM SEWER NETWORK. DELAY WILL INCREASE ‐ CHANCES OF COLLAPSE, ROAD FAILURE, AND FLOODING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS PREVENTATIVE AND TARGETS PIPES ‐ PRONE TO FAILURE AND SURCHARGING. REHABILITATION ‐ WILL REDUCE RISKS BY ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL AND ‐ CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ A REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, INCLUDING FLUSHING, ‐ VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG 2023 560,000 STDM07 192 385 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 45,000 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REHABILITATION & DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ANNUAL PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS UNPLANNED PIPE, ‐ DRAINAGE, AND TREATMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE OF INTERNAL CREWS AND EQUIPMENT TO COMPLETE ‐ WORK. STAFF DETERMINED THE WORKLOAD REQUIRED ‐ WOULD REDUCE CAPACITY APPLIED TOWARDS CRITICAL ‐ SERVICES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOW STAFF TO BE RESPONSIVE TO ‐ ESSENTIAL NEEDS, INCREASING CUSTOMER SERVICE, ‐ IMPROVING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY, AND REDUCING CITY ‐ LIABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE THE MAINTENANCE ‐ OF REHABILITATED, REPAIRED, OR NEW INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ CONCURRENTLY WITH EXISTING PUBLIC ASSETS. ‐ UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI 2023 45,000 STDM08 193 386 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 175,000 MIDDLE CREEK DITCH REHABILITATION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REHABILITATION OF 1,500 FEET OF CONVEYANCE DITCH ‐ LOCATED NEAR N 15TH AVE FROM W MAIN ST TO W BEALL ‐ ST, WHICH HAS SEDIMENT BUILDUP, OVERGROWN ‐ VEGETATION, AND BANK EROSION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S STORM SEWER NETWORK. DELAY WILL RESULT IN ‐ AN INCREASED CHANCE OF ADJACENT PROPERTY FLOODING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE TARGETED DITCH IS INCREASINGLY PRONE TO ‐ BACKUPS AND FLOODING. REHABILITATION WILL REDUCE ‐ RISKS BY ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL AND CAPACITY ‐ DEFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ A REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, INCLUDING INSPECTION AND ‐ CLEARING. ‐ MIDDLE CREEK DITCH REHAB 2024 175,000 STDM09 194 387 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 530,000 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (FY24) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REHABILITATION OF 3,000 FEET OF 100‐YEAR OLD ‐ VITRIFIED CLAY STORM SEWER, WHICH HAS EXCEEDED ITS ‐ LIFE CYCLE, DOES NOT MEET CAPACITY STANDARDS, AND ‐ INCLUDES MANY STRUCTURAL FAILURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S STORM SEWER NETWORK. DELAY WILL INCREASE ‐ CHANCES OF COLLAPSE, ROAD FAILURE, AND FLOODING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS PREVENTATIVE AND TARGETS PIPES ‐ PRONE TO FAILURE AND SURCHARGING. REHABILITATION ‐ WILL REDUCE RISKS BY ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL AND ‐ CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ A REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, INCLUDING FLUSHING, ‐ VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG 2024 530,000 STDM10 (FY24) 195 388 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 475,000 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (FY25) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REHABILITATION OF 2,400 FEET OF 100‐YEAR OLD ‐ VITRIFIED CLAY STORM SEWER, WHICH HAS EXCEEDED ITS ‐ LIFE CYCLE, DOES NOT MEET CAPACITY STANDARDS, AND ‐ INCLUDES MANY STRUCTURAL FAILURES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S STORM SEWER NETWORK. DELAY WILL INCREASE ‐ CHANCES OF COLLAPSE, ROAD FAILURE, AND FLOODING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS PREVENTATIVE AND TARGETS PIPES ‐ PRONE TO FAILURE AND SURCHARGING. REHABILITATION ‐ WILL REDUCE RISKS BY ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL AND ‐ CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ A REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, INCLUDING FLUSHING, ‐ VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG 2025 475,000 STDM10 (FY25) 196 389 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 45,000 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ANNUAL PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS UNPLANNED PIPE, ‐ DRAINAGE, AND TREATMENT PROJECTS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE OF INTERNAL CREWS AND EQUIPMENT TO COMPLETE ‐ WORK. STAFF DETERMINED THE WORKLOAD REQUIRED WOULD ‐ REDUCE CAPACITY APPLIED TOWARDS CRITICAL SERVICES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOW STAFF TO BE RESPONSIVE TO ‐ ESSENTIAL NEEDS, INCREASING CUSTOMER SERVICE, ‐ IMPROVING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY, AND REDUCING CITY ‐ LIABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE THE MAINTENANCE ‐ OF REHABILITATED, REPAIRED, OR NEW INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ CONCURRENTLY WITH EXISTING PUBLIC ASSETS. ‐ UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI 2024 45,000 STDM11 (FY24) 197 390 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 45,000 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ANNUAL PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS UNPLANNED PIPE, ‐ DRAINAGE, AND TREATMENT PROJECTS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE OF INTERNAL CREWS AND EQUIPMENT TO COMPLETE ‐ WORK. STAFF DETERMINED THE WORKLOAD REQUIRED WOULD ‐ REDUCE CAPACITY APPLIED TOWARDS CRITICAL SERVICES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOW STAFF TO BE RESPONSIVE TO ‐ ESSENTIAL NEEDS, INCREASING CUSTOMER SERVICE, ‐ IMPROVING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY, AND REDUCING CITY ‐ LIABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE THE MAINTENANCE ‐ OF REHABILITATED, REPAIRED, OR NEW INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ CONCURRENTLY WITH EXISTING PUBLIC ASSETS. ‐ UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI 2025 45,000 STDM11 (FY25) 198 391 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # UTILITY OPERATION PROJECT 50,000 STORMWATER UTILITY COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ HIRING A QUALIFIED CONSULTANT TO COMPLETE A COST ‐ OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY. STUDIES ARE A BEST ‐ PRACTICE FOR UTILITY MANAGEMENT AND WILL GUIDE ‐ FUTURE RATE ADJUSTMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ MAINTAIN EXISTING RATE STRUCTURE AND DETERMINE ‐ ADJUSTMENTS ANNUALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL RESULT IN RECOMMENDATIONS TO ‐ ENSURE THE CITY'S SERVICE CHARGES MATCH THE ACTUAL ‐ COST OF UTILITY OPERATION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ NONE ‐ STORMWATER RATE STUDY 2021 50,000 STOP02 199 392 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OPERATION SUPPORT PROJECT 35,000 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLE (#01) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF STAFF'S 2000 DODGE DAKOTA. THE ‐ TRUCK HAS BEEN IN OPERATION FOR 22 YEARS AND SERVED NUMEROUS DIVISIONS. SIGNIFICANT MAINTENANCE AND SAFETY ISSUES EXIST. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION HAS FOUR ADMINISTRATIVE ‐ EMPLOYEES THAT SHARE TWO DEDICATED VEHICLES. NOT ‐ REPLACING WOULD RESULT IN IMPACTS TO DAILY ‐ OPERATIONS OF THE DIVISION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR A RELIABLE AND SAFE VEHICLE FOR STAFF ‐ TO COMPLETE DAILY ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS POLLUTION ‐ MITIGATION, EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT, FLOOD RESPONSE, ‐ AND FIELD INSPECTIONS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION WILL FUND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. STORMWATER VEHICLE 2022 35,000 STOP03 200 393 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OPERATION SUPPORT PROJECT 250,000 PIPE INSPECTION VAN (#01) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF THE PIPE INSPECTION VAN PURCHASED ‐ IN 2001 AND REFURBISHED IN 2015. THE VEHICLE'S ‐ CHASSIS IS HEAVILY WORN AND THE ONBOARD COMPUTER ‐ SYSTEM IS AGED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE THE EXISTING VEHICLE, WHICH COULD ‐ RESULT IN DOWNTIME AND INCREASINGLY COSTLY ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE VEHICLE FACILITATES THE CITY'S PIPE INSPECTION ‐ PROGRAM, WHICH INDENTIFIES MAINTENANCE NEEDS, ‐ LOCATES STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES, AND DETECTS ‐ ILLEGAL CONNECTIONS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION WILL FUND OPERATION AND ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. PIPE INSPECTION VAN 2025 250,000 STOP04 201 394 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # UTILITY OPERATION PROJECT 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF A MECHANICAL STREET SWEEPER LEASED ‐ IN 2015. THE SWEEPER HAS BEEN IN OPERATION FOR ‐ SIX YEARS, HAS 3,320 HOURS, AND 24,000 MILES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE THE EXISTING STREET SWEEPER, RESULTING IN ‐ INCREASED DOWNTIME AND MAINTENANCE. INDUSTRY ‐ GUIDANCE RECOMMENDS REPLACING MUNICIPAL SWEEPERS ‐ EVERY FIVE YEARS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ STREET SWEEPING PROTECTS AIR QUALITY, IMPROVES ‐ WATERWAYS AND DEQ PERMIT STANDING, AND REDUCES ‐ SLIP HAZARDS. ‐ STREET SWEEPER (#01) ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION WILL FUND OPERATION AND ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. THE SWEEPER SUPPLEMENTS THE ‐ CLEANING PROGRAM LED BY THE STREETS DIVISION. STREET SWEEPER 2021 200,000 STOP05 202 395 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OPERATION SUPPORT PROJECT 35,000 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLE (#02) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF STAFF'S 2019 DODGE RAM. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION HAS FOUR ADMINISTRATIVE ‐ EMPLOYEES THAT SHARE TWO DEDICATED VEHICLES. NOT ‐ REPLACING WOULD RESULT IN IMPACTS TO DAILY ‐ OPERATIONS OF THE DIVISION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR A RELIABLE AND SAFE VEHICLE FOR STAFF ‐ TO COMPLETE DAILY ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS POLLUTION ‐ MITIGATION, EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT, FLOOD RESPONSE, ‐ AND FIELD INSPECTIONS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION WILL FUND OPERATION AND ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ OPERATION SUPPORT PROJECT 50,000 SERVICE VEHICLE (#01) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF STAFF'S 2017 FORD F350 SERVICE ‐ VEHICLE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION HAS THREE OPERATIONS EMPLOYEES THAT SHARE ONE DEDICATED SERVICE VEHICLE. NOT REPLACING WOULD RESULT IN NEGATIVE ‐ IMPACTS TO DAILY OPERATIONS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR A RELIABLE AND SAFE VEHICLE FOR STAFF ‐ TO COMPLETE DAILY ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION, REPAIR, AND ‐ REPLACEMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION WILL FUND OPERATION AND ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ STORMWATER VEHICLE UNSCHEDULED 35,000 STOP06 STORMWATER SVC VEHICLE UNSCHEDULED 50,000 STOP07 203 396 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OPERATION SUPPORT PROJECT 520,000 VACUUM AND JETTING TRUCK (#01) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF THE VACUUM AND JETTING TRUCK ‐ LEASED IN 2015. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE THE EXISTING VEHICLE, WHICH COULD RESULT IN DOWNTIME AND INCREASINGLY COSTLY MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE VEHICLE FACILITATES INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ MAINTENANCE, POLLUTION EVENT CLEANUP, AND VACUUM ‐ EXCAVATION FOR PIPE REPAIRS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ THE STORMWATER DIVISION WILL FUND OPERATION AND ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ OPERATION SUPPORT PROJECT 50,000 SEDIMENT DISPOSAL FACILITY ASPHALT REPAIR ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE OF THE ASPHALT SURFACE ‐ LOCATED AT THE SEDIMENT DISPOSAL FACILITY USED FOR ‐ STORMWATER WASTE DISPOSAL GENERATED FROM ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROLONG ASPHALT MAINTENANCE RISKING DEGRADATION OF ‐ DRIVING SURFACES AND INCREASED DEFERRED EXPENSE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL ENSURE THE FACILITY REMAINS ‐ OPERATIONAL AND SAFE. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ NONE ‐ SEDIMENT DISP FAC RD RPR 2022 50,000 STOS01 VACUUM & JETTING TRUCK UNSCHEDULED 520,000 STOP08 204 397 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # RIVER HEALTH PROJECT 300,000 DOWNTOWN MECHANICAL STORMWATER TREATMENT (PHASE 3) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALLATION OF TWO STORMWATER TREATMENT UNITS ‐ NEAR THE INTERSECTIONS OF N ROUSE AVE AND E PEACH ‐ ST AND N ROUSE AVE AND E TAMARACK ST. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STAFF HAS NOT IDENTIFIED AN ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT ‐ APPROACH WITH COMPARABLE MAINTENANCE EASE, ‐ CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT, OR POLLUTANT REMOVAL ‐ EFFICIENCY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE UNITS WILL COLLECT OVER 20‐TONS OF POLLUTANTS ‐ ANNUALLY FROM 138‐ACRES. THEY WILL IMPROVE PUBLIC ‐ SAFETY, BOZEMAN CREEK'S HABITAT, AND DEQ PERMIT ‐ STANDING. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STAFF WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE SEMI‐ANNUALLY ‐ USING EXISTING VACUUMING EQUIPMENT AND DRYING ‐ BEDS. DEBRIS WILL EVENTUALLY BE DISPOSED AT THE ‐ LANDFILL. ‐ THE UNITS WILL TREAT STORMWATER GENERAGED FROM ‐ DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH3 2021 300,000 STRH01 205 398 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # RIVER HEALTH PROJECT 250,000 DOWNTOWN MECHANICAL STORMWATER TREATMENT (PHASE 4) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALLATION OF TWO STORMWATER TREATMENT UNITS ‐ NEAR THE INTERSECTIONS OF S BLACK AVE AND ‐ E CLEVELAND ST AND S BOZEMAN AVE AND E CLEVELAND ‐ ST. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STAFF HAS NOT IDENTIFIED AN ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT ‐ APPROACH WITH COMPARABLE MAINTENANCE EASE, ‐ CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT, OR POLLUTANT REMOVAL ‐ EFFICIENCY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE UNITS WILL COLLECT OVER 27‐TONS OF POLLUTANTS ‐ ANNUALLY FROM 193‐ACRES. THEY WILL IMPROVE PUBLIC ‐ SAFETY, BOZEMAN CREEK'S HABITAT, AND DEQ PERMIT ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST IN THE FUTURE: ‐ STAFF WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE SEMI‐ANNUALLY ‐ USING EXISTING VACUUMING EQUIPMENT AND DRYING ‐ BEDS. DEBRIS WILL EVENTUALLY BE DISPOSED AT THE ‐ BEFORE HAULING TO THE LANDFILL FOR FINAL DISPOSAL. ‐ STANDING. ‐ DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH4 2022 250,000 STRH02 206 399 Street & Curb Reconstruction 207 400 STREET & CURB RECONSTRUCTION FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 2,146,605 $ 1,762,338 $ 1,723,436 $ 2,042,724 $ 2,153,671 $ 2,348,728 Plus: Street Maintenance Assessments Dedicated $ 709,733 $ 723,928 $ 738,406 $ 753,174 $ 768,238 $ 783,603 Plus: SID for N Tracy ‐ SCR16 ‐ 50% $ 506,000 Plus: SID for S 5th (Olive to Hayes) ‐75% $ 2,108,490 Plus: SID for W Harrison (Tracy to 6th) ‐ 75% $ 1,077,356 Plus: SID for S 6th (Babcock to Cleveland) ‐ 75% $ 1,746,681 Plus: SID for S 3rd (Olive to Cleveland) ‐75% 1,539,543 Plus: SID for S 4th (College to Babcock) ‐75% 1,351,322 Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (1,600,000) $ (2,871,320) $ (1,496,474) $ (2,388,908) $ (2,112,724) $ (1,861,763) $ (10,104,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 1,762,338 $ 1,723,436 $ 2,042,724 $ 2,153,671 $ 2,348,728 $ 2,621,890 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Total Estimated Annual Street Assessment Revenue $ 709,733 $ 709,733 $ 723,928 $ 738,406 $ 753,174 $ 768,238 Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Attributed to Annexations 0.0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Total Estimated Revenues $ 709,733 $ 723,928 $ 738,406 $ 753,174 $ 768,238 $ 783,603 Current Revenues Dedicated to Street & Curb CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Reconstruction & Curbs 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 709,733 $ 723,928 $ 738,406 $ 753,174 $ 768,238 $ 783,603 Projected Projected CURRENT $(2,871,320) $(1,496,474) $(2,388,908) $(2,112,724) $(1,861,763) $(10,104,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 208 401 STREET & CURB RECONSTRUCTION FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled SCR01 ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 ‐ SCR13 S 6TH (BABCOCK TO CLEVELAND)‐DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 2,328,908 ‐ ‐ ‐ SCR14 S 5TH (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 2,811,320 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SCR15 W HARRISON (TRACY TO 6TH)‐DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ‐ 1,436,474 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SCR23 UNSCHEDULED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10,104,000 SCR24 S 3RD (OLIVE TO CLEVELAND) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,052,724 ‐ ‐ SCR25 S 4TH (COLLEGE TO BABCOCK) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,801,763 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,871,320 1,496,474 2,388,908 2,112,724 1,861,763 10,104,000 209 402 STREET & CURB RECONSTRUCTION FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This plan outlines the use of Street Maintenance District dollars that are dedicated to the reconstruction of streets and curbs. The policy for required matches with Special Improvement Districts (SID’s) is outlined in Commission Resolution No. 4507. Each project is dependent upon the creation of a Special Improvement District to pay for a share of the project costs. If preliminary information indicates that property owners along the street are likely to have sufficient protests to prevent creation of the SID, we recommend moving to the next project on the list. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The roads are proposed each year and depending on the preliminary information staff will move forward or move on to the next project on the list. 210 403 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER ‐ TO GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS ‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF MATERIALS ‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 2021 SCR01 (FY21) 211 404 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER ‐ TO GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS ‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF MATERIALS ‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 2022 60,000 SCR01 (FY22) 212 405 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER ‐ TO GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN ‐ CURBS CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECT ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF MATERIALS ‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 2023 60,000 SCR01 (FY23) 213 406 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER TO ‐ GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS ‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF MATERIALS ‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 2024 60,000 SCR01 (FY24) 214 407 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WHEN A PEDESTRIAN RAMP IS INSTALLED, MANY TIMES ‐ THE ADJACENT CURBS NEED TO BE REPLACED IN ORDER TO ‐ GET DRAINAGE TO NOT STOP AT THE NEW RAMP. ‐ SMALLER CURB REPAIRS CAN BE NECESSARY RATHER THAN ‐ REPLACING A WHOLE BLOCK. THESE REPAIRS RESULT IN ‐ IMPROVED STORMWATER CONTROL, AND FACILITATES ‐ BETTER STREET SWEEPING. ADDITIONALLY, BROKEN CURBS ‐ CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO VEHICLE TIRES. THESE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE COMBINED WITH ADA RAMP ‐ REPLACEMENT WORK AND INLET REPLACEMENT WORK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE CURRENT OPERATIONS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW COMPLETION OF SMALLER PROJECTS ‐ INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR AN ENTIRE BLOCK TO BE ‐ REPAIRED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ COST OF MATERIALS ‐ ANNUAL CURB REPLACEMENT & CONCRETE REPAIR PROGRAM 2025 60,000 SCR01 (FY25) 215 408 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # S 6TH (BABCOCK TO CLEVELAND)‐DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2,328,908 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH 6TH AVENUE FROM BABCOCK TO ‐ CLEVELAND, INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS & ‐ GUTTERS. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING ‐ CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, ‐ EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO ‐ A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND ‐ KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE ‐ A CITY STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER ‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES SOUTH 6TH TO FUNCTION AS A LOCAL ‐ STREET, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A 75% CONTRIBUTION ‐ FROM PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT ‐ DISTRICT ASSESSMENT. ‐ S 6TH (BABCOCK TO CLEVELAND)‐DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2023 2,328,908 SCR13 216 409 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # S 5TH (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 2,811,320 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH 5TH AVE FROM OLIVE TO ‐ HAYES, INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND ‐ GUTTERS. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING ‐ CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, ‐ EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO ‐ A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND ‐ KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE ‐ A CITY STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER ‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES SOUTH 5TH TO FUNCTION AS A MINOR ‐ COLLECTOR, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A 50% CONTRIBUTION ‐ FROM PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL DISTRICT ‐ ASSESSMENT. ‐ S 5TH (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 2021 2,811,320 SCR14 217 410 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # W HARRISON (TRACY TO 6TH)‐DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 1,436,474 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF WEST HARRISON FROM TRACY TO 6TH, ‐ INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND GUTTERS. THE ‐ STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING CONDITION AND ‐ CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE ‐ STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO THE POINT WHERE ‐ IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO ‐ PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A CITY ‐ STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER ‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES WEST HARRISON TO FUNCTION AS A ‐ LOCAL STREET, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A 75% ‐ CONTRIBUTION FROM PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT. ‐ UNSCHEDULED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ‐ 10,104,000 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION: ‐ DAVIS (CHURCH TO PLUM) ‐ $702,000 ‐ N GRAND (MENDENHALL TO PEACH) ‐ $1,311,000 ‐ W OLIVE (8TH TO TRACY) ‐ $1,911,000 ‐ S GRAND (OLIVE TO HAYES) ‐ $2,331,000 ‐ W LINCOLN (GRAND TO WILLSON) ‐ $247,000 ‐ S BLACK (COLLEGE TO CUL‐DE‐SAC) ‐ $753,000 ‐ N 17TH (DURSTON TO END) ‐ $1,114,000 ‐ W KOCH (8TH TO TRACY) ‐ 1,735,000 ‐ UNSCHEDULED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS UNSCHEDULED 10,104,000 SCR23 W HARRISON (TRACY TO 6TH)‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 2022 1,436,474 SCR15 218 411 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # S 3RD (OLIVE TO CLEVELAND) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2,052,724 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF S 3RD AVE FROM OLIVE TO ‐ CLEVELAND, INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND ‐ GUTTERS. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING ‐ CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, ‐ EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO ‐ A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND ‐ KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE ‐ A CITY STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER ‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. ‐ S 3RD (OLIVE TO CLEVELAND) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2024 2,052,724 SCR24 219 412 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # S 4TH (COLLEGE TO BABCOCK) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 1,801,763 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF S 4TH FROM COLLEGE TO BABCOCK, ‐ INCLUDING REPAIRS TO FAILED CURBS AND GUTTERS. ‐ THE STREET IS ALREADY IN A FAILING CONDITION AND ‐ CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE ‐ STREET WILL BECOME DETERIORATED TO A POINT WHERE ‐ IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO ‐ PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A CITY ‐ STANDARD STREET SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE ‐ WHICH WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ‐ ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE ‐ POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE ‐ AND MS4 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT ‐ COMPLETION. THIS PROJECT WILL TRIGGER WATER, SEWER ‐ AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION AREA. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, ‐ PROJECT ESTIMATES SOUTH 5TH TO FUNCTION AS A LOCAL ‐ STREET WHICH REQUIRES A 75% CONTRIBUTION FROM ‐ PROPERTY OWNERS VIA A SPECIAL DISTRICT ‐ ASSESSMENT. ‐ S 4TH (COLLEGE TO BABCOCK) ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2025 1,801,763 SCR25 220 413 Street Impact Fee 221 414 STREET IMPACT FEE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 8,860,180 $ 79,976 $ (968,325) $ 812,642 $ (3,219,153) $ (1,315,419) Plus: Impact Fee Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 4,790,095 $ 4,981,699 $ 5,180,967 $ 5,388,205 $ 5,603,734 $ 5,827,883 $ ‐ Plus: Urban Funds: Less: Carryover FY19 Capital Projects $ (6,005,104) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (7,565,195) $ (6,030,000) $ (3,400,000) $ (9,420,000) $ (3,700,000) $ (3,526,000) $ (27,600,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 79,976 $ (968,325) $ 812,642 $ (3,219,153) $ (1,315,419) $ 986,464 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Street Impact Fee Revenues $ 4,790,095 $ 4,790,095 $ 4,981,699 $ 5,180,967 $ 5,388,205 $ 5,603,734 Estimated Annual Increase ** 0.0% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Total Estimated Revenues $ 4,790,095 $ 4,981,699 $ 5,180,967 $ 5,388,205 $ 5,603,734 $ 5,827,883 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Street Capacity Expansion CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 4,790,095 $ 4,981,699 $ 5,180,967 $ 5,388,205 $ 5,603,734 $ 5,827,883 Projected Projected CURRENT $(6,030,000) $(3,400,000) $(9,420,000) $(3,700,000) $(3,526,000) $(27,600,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS 222 415 STREET IMPACT FEE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY *Share funding with Arterial & Collector District Fund Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled SIF001 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 ‐ SIF009 KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 1,000,000 ‐ SIF086 *BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF110 *MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 1,600,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF112 HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 130,000 ‐ ‐ 850,000 ‐ SIF113 *GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 2,500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF114 *FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ ‐ 3,750,000 1,250,000 ‐ ‐ SIF116 *BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF117 *STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF118 *BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 200,000 550,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF138 *COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ ‐ 1,670,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF143 BAXTER & COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION ‐ RIGHT OF WAY ‐ ‐ 550,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF144 HAGGERTY/MAIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 SIF146 KAGY/11TH INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF147 *OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ 750,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF149 *BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300,000 1,500,000 SIF150 15TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 SIF151 HIGHLAND ‐ MAIN TO KAGY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,000,000 SIF152 *N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,000,000 SIF153 *DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,400,000 SIF154 *CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 SIF155 KAGY:WILLSON TO HIGHLAND ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8,000,000 SIF156 *HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 SIF157 COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐DESIGN ‐ ‐ 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF158 *COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 876,000 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 6,030,000 3,400,000 9,420,000 3,700,000 3,526,000 27,350,000 223 416 Project Street Impact Fee Funding Arterial & Collector Funding Total Project Funding *BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) CONSTRUCTION 2,000,000 500,000 2,500,000 *MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 1,600,000 400,000 2,000,000 *GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 3,500,000 2,000,000 5,500,000 *FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) 5,000,000 2,500,000 7,500,000 *BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 300,000 1,500,000 *STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) 250,000 250,000 500,000 *BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 *COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER 1,670,000 1,670,000 3,340,000 *OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (FY23 for SIF and FY25 for A&C) 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 *BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH 1,800,000 500,000 2,300,000 *N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL 4,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 *DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1,400,000 350,000 1,750,000 *CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION 1,200,000 300,000 1,500,000 *HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 500,000 2,500,000 *COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION 876,000 876,000 1,752,000 224 417 STREET IMPACT FEE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND Street Impact Fees go towards capacity expanding road improvements. The Arterial & Collector District will be providing significant amounts of “local share” in advance of the local projects, so that critical portions of the street network can be connected (See the Arterial & Collector CIP). For non‐ intersection improvements, the Arterial & Collector District will be “paid back”, in the future, if/when the local project moves forward, or upon annexation via a Payback District arrangement. The Commission’s recent changes that allow waivers for certain projects that are within the first 3 years of the Capital Improvements Plan and have all the necessary right‐of‐way and funding plans, has added pressure to include projects within the first three years, with the exception of SIF147, its funding from Arterial and & Collector District fund is in FY25, so no waivers concerning this project will be granted. Sometimes the budgeting of these project fully in one year leads to a large negative balance. Given the fact that lead‐times (design/right of way) and construction timeframes on these projects usually span 24 months, we feel comfortable developing a CIP that could be in a negative position by approximately “one‐year’s‐worth” of revenues at any given point before year five. With the completion of the impact fee study we made our revenue forecast more positive than last year before the adoption of the new fess. With the average revenue being $4.4 million and we have used a growth rate of 4%. 2,934,549.0 4,016,986.0 4,080,090.0 3,978,274.0 5,523,019.0 4,513,015.0 4,422,276.8 ‐ 1,000,000.0 2,000,000.0 3,000,000.0 4,000,000.0 5,000,000.0 6,000,000.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 FY15‐FY19 Average Street Impact Fees 225 418 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY We have made some changes from last year’s plan, SIF001 Right of Way Acquisition amounts have been increased from $250,000 a year to a range of $300,000 to $500,000 due to upcoming projects that need a large amounts of right‐of‐way to be completed. SIF009 Kagy (Wilson to 19th ) was slated last year for FY24 but Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is requiring $1 million in FY21 for continued design costs, with the remaining amounts of $2 million and $1 million scheduled for FY24 and FY25 for construction. Per the Commission’s request we added SIF112 Highland to Main Intersection Reimbursement, we are able to fund $130,000 in FY21 and remaining amount of $850,000 in FY25. SIF157 and SIF158 Is a project for College between 8th and 19th has been moved later in the plan due to funding and other projects. Other larger projects that will expand capacity to our road network are SIF 113 Griffin (7th to Rouse), which has been coordinated with MDT’s project in the area. SIF114 Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) scheduled for FY23 and FY24 that will increase capacity and extends an important north‐south corridor. Multiple projects were added to the unscheduled portion of the CIP to identify streets priorities in the 5‐10 year timeframe. All the road projects funded by the Street Impact Fee fund will include bike lanes and aid in our efforts towards the Strategic Plan 4.5 a Enhance Non‐motorized Transportation. 226 419 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS THE ‐ EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND CAPACITY ‐ WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL RIGHT‐OF‐ ‐ WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ELEMENTS OF THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN DOING SO, ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS OFTEN A ‐ PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRITICAL ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. OTHER ‐ STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS COULD POTENTIALLY BE ‐ AFFECTED BY R/W ACQUISITION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE ‐ MARKET. AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC ‐ CONDEMNATION PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO ‐ WAIT FOR VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ STREET IMPACT FEES CAN NOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING ‐ AND MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO ‐ BE A VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST FOR THE STREET ‐ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT. ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 50,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2021 $ 300,000 SIF001 (FY21) 227 420 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS THAT ‐ THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ELEMENT ‐ OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN DOING SO, ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS OFTEN A ‐ PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRITICAL ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ALL OF THE OTHER STREET ‐ IMPACT FEE PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE ‐ MARKET. AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC ‐ CONDEMNATION PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING ‐ TO WAIT FOR VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ STREET IMPACT FEES CAN NOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING ‐ AND MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO ‐ BE A VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 100,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2022 $ 350,000 SIF001 (FY22) 228 421 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS THAT ‐ THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ELEMENT ‐ OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN DOING SO, ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS OFTEN A ‐ PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRITICAL ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ALL OF THE OTHER ‐ STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE ‐ MARKET. AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC ‐ CONDEMNATION PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO ‐ WAIT FOR VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ STREET IMPACT FEES CANNOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING & ‐ MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO BE A ‐ VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 150,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2023 $ 400,000 SIF001 (FY23) 229 422 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS ‐ THAT THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN ‐ DOING SO, CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION ‐ MASTER PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS ‐ OFTEN A PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ‐ CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. ‐ ALL OF THE OTHER STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS COULD ‐ POTENTIALLY BE AFFECTED BY R/W ACQUISITION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET ‐ AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC CONDEMNATION ‐ PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO WAIT FOR ‐ VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS: STREET ‐ IMPACT FEES CANNOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING & ‐ MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO BE A ‐ VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 200,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2024 $ 450,000 SIF001 (FY24) 230 423 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS ‐ THAT THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN ‐ DOING SO, CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION ‐ MASTER PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS ‐ OFTEN A PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ‐ CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. ‐ ALL OF THE OTHER STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS COULD ‐ POTENTIALLY BE AFFECTED BY R/W ACQUISITION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET ‐ AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC CONDEMNATION ‐ PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO WAIT FOR ‐ VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS: STREET ‐ IMPACT FEES CANNOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING & ‐ MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO BE A ‐ VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2025 $ 500,000 SIF001 (FY25) 231 424 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONSTRUCTING KAGY BLVD ‐ FROM THE INTERSECTION OF 19TH TO WILLSON AVE TO A ‐ 4 LANE URBAN ARTERIAL STANDARD. THIS PROJECT ‐ DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES & SIDEWALKS & ‐ MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTIONS. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ KAGY SERVES AS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF BOZEMAN'S ‐ PERIMETER STREET SYSTEM CONNECTION HIGHLAND BLVD, ‐ WILLSON AVE, AND S 19TH. IT ALSO SERVES AS THE ‐ PRIMARY ACCESS TO MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY & THE ‐ UNIVERSITY'S MAJOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES. THE LEVEL ‐ OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) & CONFORMANCE WITH ‐ THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED ‐ WITH THIS PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT KAGY & 19TH, KAGY & ‐ 11TH, AND KAGY & WILLSON. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, URBAN FUNDS, INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION BY ‐ ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS:INCREMENTAL ‐ INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ $1 MILLION IS MOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN ‐ FY24 TO FY21 TO ADVANCE DESIGN BY MDT IN ADVANCE ‐ OF THE PROJECT. MDT HAS ALREADY INVESTED. ‐ KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2021 $ 1,000,000 SIF009 (FY21) 232 425 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # KAGY(WILLSON TO 19TH)DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONSTRUCTING KAGY BLVD ‐ FROM THE INTERSECTION OF S 19TH AVE TO WILLSON AVE ‐ TO A 4 LANE URBAN ARTERIAL STANDARD. THIS PROJECT ‐ DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS & ‐ MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTIONS. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ KAGY SERVES AS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF BOZEMAN'S ‐ PERIMETER STREET SYSTEM CONNECTING HIGHLAND BLVD, ‐ WILLSON AVE, AND S 19TH. IT ALSO SERVES AS THE ‐ PRIMARY ACCESS TO MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE ‐ UNIVERSITY'S MAJOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES. THE LEVEL ‐ OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED WITH THIS PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED ‐ PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT KAGY ‐ & 19TH, KAGY & 7TH, KAGY & 11TH, AND KAGY & ‐ WILLSON. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, URBAN FUNDS, INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION BY ‐ ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS:INCREMENTAL ‐ INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LST CIP: ‐ NONE ‐ KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2024 $ 2,000,000 SIF009 (FY24) 233 426 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # KAGY(WILLSON TO 19TH)DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONSTRUCTING KAGY BLVD ‐ FROM THE INTERSECTION OF S 19TH AVE TO WILLSON AVE ‐ TO A 4 LANE URBAN ARTERIAL STANDARD. THIS PROJECT ‐ DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS & ‐ MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTIONS. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ KAGY SERVES AS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF BOZEMAN'S ‐ PERIMETER STREET SYSTEM CONNECTING HIGHLAND BLVD, ‐ WILLSON AVE, AND S 19TH. IT ALSO SERVES AS THE ‐ PRIMARY ACCESS TO MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE ‐ UNIVERSITY'S MAJOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES. THE LEVEL ‐ OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED WITH THIS PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED ‐ PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT KAGY ‐ & 19TH, KAGY & 7TH, KAGY & 11TH, AND KAGY & ‐ WILLSON. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, URBAN FUNDS, INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION BY ‐ ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS:INCREMENTAL ‐ INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LST CIP: ‐ NONE ‐ KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2025 $ 1,000,000 SIF009 (FY25) 234 427 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ 2,000,000 CONSTRUCTION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION AT BAXTER AND COTTONWOOD. ‐ THIS INTERSECTION IS CURRENTLY 1‐WAY STOP ‐ CONTROLLED. REPLACING IT WITH A SIGNAL OR ‐ ROUNDABOUT WILL GREATLY INCREASE ITS CAPACITY. ‐ EAST‐WEST CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS ‐ LOCATION. NORTH‐SOUTH CONNECTIVITY IS STILL ‐ LACKING. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) ‐ AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE COTTONWOOD CORRIDOR ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AND BAXTER CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ IDENTIFIED IN THE 2007 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE. ‐ INCLUDES INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL, ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR OTHER ADEQUATE TRAFFIC CONTROL ‐ DEVICE WHEN WARRANTS ARE MET. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ $ 2,000,000 SIF086 BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 235 428 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 1,600,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION CONTROL AT MANLEY & ‐ GRIFFIN. THIS INTERSECTION IS CURRENTLY 1‐WAY ‐ STOP CONTROLLED REPLACING IT WITH A SIGNAL WILL ‐ GREATLY INCREASE ITS CAPACITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS ‐ WHICH IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. A PAYBACK DISTRICT ‐ OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER ‐ STAKEHOLDERS. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN MOVED TO ‐ COINCIDE WITH THE GRIFFIN CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTION & ‐ MDT'S GRIFFIN & 7TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LOS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ ‐ MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION 2021 $ 1,600,000 IMPROVEMENTS) 236 429 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 130,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PER CITY COMMISSION DIRECTION, DEVELOPER TO BE ‐ REIMBURSED IN 2 FISCAL YEARS. $130K IN FY21 & ‐ $850K IN FY25. ‐ HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 850,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CITY COMMISSION DIRECTION, DEVELOPER TO BE REIMBURSED IN 2 FISCAL YEARS. $130K IN FY21 & ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NONE ‐ INCLUDED PER COMMISSION DIRECTION. ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ADDED PER COMMISSION DIRECTION. HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 2021 $ 130,000 SIF112 (FY21) HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 2025 $ 850,000 SIF112 (FY25) 237 430 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT W GRIFFIN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS FROM N. ‐ 7TH TO ROUSE TO AN URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. ‐ DESIGNED IMPROVEMENTS WILL IMPROVE LOS AT THE KEY ‐ INTERSECTIONS AND WILL INCREASE CAPACITY IN THE ‐ CORRIDOR AS A WHOLE. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS ‐ AT THIS LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY WHICH IS BEING ‐ EXPANDED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ‐ (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AT GRIFFIN AND 7TH AND GRIFFIN AND ‐ ROUSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (DO NOTHING). ‐ ALTERNATIVE FINANCING COULD BE PROVIDED BY ‐ CREATING AN SID OR PAYBACK DISTRICT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF OUR ‐ STREET NETWORK AND IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND ‐ PEDESTRIANS. FACILITATES DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY ‐ OCCURRING IN THIS PART OF THE CITY AND NETWORK ‐ PERFORMANCE OVERALL. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ‐ GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2021 $ 1,000,000 SIF113 (FY21) 238 431 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2 2,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT W GRIFFIN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS FROM N. ‐ 7TH TO ROUSE TO AN URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. ‐ DESIGNED IMPROVEMENTS WILL IMPROVE LOS AT THE KEY ‐ INTERSECTIONS AND WILL INCREASE CAPACITY IN THE ‐ CORRIDOR AS A WHOLE. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS ‐ AT THIS LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY WHICH IS BEING ‐ EXPANDED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ‐ (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AT GRIFFIN AND 7TH AND GRIFFIN AND ‐ ROUSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (DO NOTHING). ‐ ALTERNATIVE FINANCING COULD BE PROVIDED BY ‐ CREATING AN SID OR PAYBACK DISTRICT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF OUR ‐ STREET NETWORK AND IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND ‐ PEDESTRIANS. FACILITATES DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY ‐ OCCURRING IN THIS PART OF THE CITY AND NETWORK ‐ PERFORMANCE OVERALL. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ‐ $ 2,500,000 SIF113 (FY22) GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2022 239 432 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 3,750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE THE SECTION OF FOWLER FROM HUFFINE TO ‐ OAK. THIS PROJECT ALLOWS FOR EXTENSION OF FOWLER, ‐ WHICH WILL DIRECTLY INCREASE CAPACITY, AND IT ‐ EXTENDS AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH CORRIDOR ON THE ‐ WEST SIDE OF THE CITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH ‐ IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED ‐ TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS ‐ OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS ‐ PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ON FOWLER AT HUFFINE, ‐ BABCOCK, DURSTON, AND OAK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMPLETES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ON ‐ OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 $ 3,750,000 SIF114 (FY23) 240 433 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE THE SECTION OF FOWLER FROM HUFFINE TO ‐ OAK. THIS PROJECT ALLOWS FOR EXTENSION OF FOWLER, ‐ WHICH WILL DIRECTLY INCREASE CAPACITY, AND IT ‐ EXTENDS AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH CORRIDOR ON THE ‐ WEST SIDE OF THE CITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH ‐ IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED ‐ TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS ‐ OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS ‐ PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ON FOWLER AT HUFFINE, ‐ BABCOCK, DURSTON, AND OAK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMPLETES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ON ‐ OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2024 $ 1,250,000 SIF114 (FY24) 241 434 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION 1,200,000 IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION CONTROL AT BRIDGER AND ‐ STORY MILL. ADDING ADDITIONAL PHASES AND IMPROVING ‐ GEOMETRY WILL INCREASE CAPACITY FOR DEFICIENT ‐ MOVEMENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ‐ WHICH IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. OTHER AFFECTED ‐ PROJECTS INCLUDE STORY MILL, GRIFFIN‐BRIDGER DR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LOS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2021 $ 1,200,000 SIF116 242 435 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE STORY MILL FROM GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER. THIS ‐ PROJECT DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ‐ ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND ‐ SIDEWALKS. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS TO STORY MILL AND BRIDGER DRIVE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ‐ ON OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2021 $ 250,000 SIF117 243 436 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) DESIGN 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 15TH TO 19TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ALLOWS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE TO THE CORRIDOR ‐ AT A TIME MORE FAVORABLE TO THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 2021 $ 200,000 SIF118 (FY21) 244 437 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) CONSTRUCTION 550,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 15TH TO 19TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ALLOWS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE TO THE CORRIDOR ‐ AT A TIME MORE FAVORABLE TO THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 2022 $ 550,000 SIF118 (FY22) 245 438 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,670,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF A 5 LANE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, PAYBACK DISTRICT, TOPS, INCREMENTAL ‐ CONSTRUCTION BY ADJACENT DEVELOPERS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY AND IMPROVE ‐ THE CONNECTIVITY OF THE CITY STREET NETWORK. IT ‐ WILL IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND PEDESTRIANS ‐ AND IMPROVE ACCESS TO THE SPORTS PARK. IT WILL ‐ FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY OCCURRING IN THIS ‐ PART OF THE CITY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BAXTER & COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION ‐ RIGHT OF WAY 550,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PURCHASE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY NECESSARY FOR THE ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF THE BAXTER & COTTONWOOD ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT CONSTRUCT INTERSECTION UNTIL ROW OBTAINED ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW AN INTERSECTION TO BUILT ‐ ADD OPERATIONAL COSTS: ‐ N/A ‐ COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 $ 1,670,000 SIF138 BAXTER & COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION ‐ RIGHT OF WAY 2023 $ 550,000 SIF143 246 439 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # HAGGERTY/MAIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ MDT HAS NOT ALLOWED AN UPGRADE TO THIS ‐ INTERSECTION IN THE PAST DUE TO THE PROXIMITY TO ‐ THE FREEWAY OFF RAMP. HOWEVER, THIS IS A CRITICAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT CITY STAFF WILL REQUEST MDT RECONSIDER ‐ ALLOWING A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION UPGRADE AT THIS ‐ LOCATION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ KAGY/11TH INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ MSU CLOSED GRANT STREET, REROUTING TRAFFIC TO KAGY ‐ RESULTING IN SIGNIFICANT DELAYS AT 11TH AND KAGY. ‐ THIS WOULD BE AN INTERIM UPGRADE UNTIL THE KAGY ‐ ROAD PROJECT IS COMPLETED IN FY24. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT UNTIL KAGY IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETED IN FY24 ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ IMPROVEMENTS ADDED TO THE CIP DUE TO THE CLOSURE ‐ OF GRANT STREET. GRANT CLOSURE IS REQUIRED FOR THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ROMNEY GYM AFTER IT'S ‐ UNEXPECTED COLLAPSE THIS PAST WINTER. ‐ KAGY/11TH INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS 2021 $ 100,000 SIF146 HAGGERTY/MAIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED $ 2,000,000 SIF144 247 440 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EASTBOUND LANE RECONFIGURATION & SIGNAL UPGRADE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES. GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH DESIGN 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 11TH TO 15TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2023 $ 750,000 SIF147 BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH 2025 $ 300,000 SIF149 (FY25) 248 441 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH CONSTRUCTION 1,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 11TH TO 15TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ 15TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS (DESIGN & 250,000 CONSTRUCTION) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ SUPPLEMENT NEW DEVELOPMENT FUNDING FOR ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ 15TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS (DESIGN & 500,000 CONSTRUCTION) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ SUPPLEMENT NEW DEVELOPMENT FUNDING FOR ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH UNSCHEDULED $ 1,500,000 SIF149 (UNSCHEDULED) 15TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED $ 500,000 SIF150 15TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS FY21 $ 250,000 SIF150 249 442 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # HIGHLAND ‐ MAIN TO KAGY 7,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADE HIGHLAND FROM MAINT TO KAGY. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO ‐ PROCEED UNTIL THESE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ‐ ADDITIONAL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES & ‐ SIDEWALKS. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS ‐ LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY THAT IS AFFECTED. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF ‐ THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT N 27TH TO A CITY COLLECTOR STREET ‐ STANDARD BETWEEN BAXTER AND CATTAIL. ‐ DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1,400,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT THE INTERSECTION OF DURSTON & 27TH. ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR SIGNAL. ‐ CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT THE INTERSECITON OF DURSTON & 27TH ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR SIGNAL. ‐ DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED $ 1,400,000 SIF153 CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED $ 1,200,000 SIF154 HIGHLAND ‐ MAIN TO KAGY UNSCHEDULED $ 7,000,000 SIF151 N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL UNSCHEDULED SIF152 250 443 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # KAGY:WILLSON TO HIGHLAND 8,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE KAGY FROM WILLSON TO HIGHLAND, INCLUDING ‐ THE INTERSECTION AT HIGHLAND & KAGY. THIS PROJECT ‐ INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES & SIDEWALKS AND BY ‐ IMPROVING INTERSECTION LOS. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS ‐ WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO ‐ PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF ‐ THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF ‐ SERVICE STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT ‐ COMPLETION. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE ‐ CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADES TO THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHLAND AND KAGY, ‐ MOST LIKELY A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION, TO ADDRESS ‐ LEVEL OF SERVICE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED $ 2,000,000 SIF156 KAGY:WILLSON TO HIGHLAND UNSCHEDULED $ 8,000,000 SIF155 251 444 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐DESIGN 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REDESIGN COLLEGE, FROM 19TH TO 8TH, TO AN URBAN ‐ MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN ‐ A FAILING CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; ‐ HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME ‐ DETERIORATED TO A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO ‐ MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL PROVIDE THE DESIGN FOR A CITY STANDARD STREET ‐ SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, ‐ PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE WHICH WILL IMPROVE ‐ PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ‐ ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE AND MS4 PERMIT ‐ COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT COMPLETION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT FAILING CONFIGURATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ENHANCES SAFETY AND DRAINAGE, PRESERVES PAVEMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐DESIGN 2023 $ 300,000 SIF157 252 445 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION 876,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REDESIGN COLLEGE, FROM 19TH TO 8TH, TO AN URBAN ‐ MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN ‐ A FAILING CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; ‐ HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME ‐ DETERIORATED TO A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO ‐ MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL PROVIDE THE DESIGN FOR A CITY STANDARD STREET ‐ SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, ‐ PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE WHICH WILL IMPROVE ‐ PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ‐ ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE AND MS4 PERMIT ‐ COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT COMPLETION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT FAILING CONFIGURATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ENHANCES SAFETY AND DRAINAGE, PRESERVES PAVEMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐ CONSTRUCTION 2025 $ 876,000 SIF158 253 446 Street Maintenance 254 447 STREET MAINTENANCE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 416,698 $ 1,233,490 $ 1,502,885 $ 1,286,397 $ 1,988,425 $ 2,714,933 Plus: Street Mtc Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,922,936 $ 1,961,395 $ 1,886,301 $ 1,924,027 $ 1,962,508 $ 2,001,758 $ ‐ Plus: Gas Tax $ 693,936 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Less: Carryover FY19 Capital Projects $ (530,000) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (1,270,080) $ (2,392,000) $ (2,802,789) $ (1,922,000) $ (1,936,000) $ (2,395,975) $ (300,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 1,233,490 $ 1,502,885 $ 1,286,397 $ 1,988,425 $ 2,714,933 $ 3,020,716 Assumptions are made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Undesignated Annual Street Mtc Revenues $ 5,494,103 $ 5,494,103 $ 5,603,985 $ 5,716,065 $ 5,830,386 $ 5,946,994 Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Attributed to Annexations 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Annual Increase in Pavement Maintenance 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total Estimated Revenues $ 5,494,103 $ 5,603,985 $ 5,716,065 $ 5,830,386 $ 5,946,994 $ 6,065,934 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 33.0% 33.0% 33.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 0.0% ‐2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 35.0% 35.0% 33.0% 33.0% 33.0% 33.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,922,936 $ 1,961,395 $ 1,886,301 $ 1,924,027 $ 1,962,508 $ 2,001,758 Projected Projected CURRENT $(2,392,000) $(2,802,789) $(1,922,000) $(1,936,000) $(2,395,975) $(300,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 255 448 STREET MAINTENANCE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled STR20 Annual Bike Path Improvement 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 ‐ STR22 Grader Lease 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 ‐ STR30 Annual Median & Boulevard 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 ‐ STR34 Sweepers 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 ‐ STR40 Dump Truck Plow Sander 200,000 ‐ 210,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ STR49 Sanders 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 ‐ ‐ STR58 Tandem Axle Dump Truck ‐ 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ STR71 Maintenance & Rehabilitation (Mill & Overlay) 550,000 913,329 1,035,000 495,000 980,000 ‐ STR75 Annual Pedestrian Ramp Repair 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 ‐ STR83 N 27TH Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Oak to Baxter) 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR84 Plug In Electric Work Truck ‐ 60,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR90 Streets Chip Seal 850,000 767,460 205,000 784,000 420,000 ‐ STR92 Oak St Median Landscaping & irrigation (Davis to Ferguson) 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 ‐ ‐ STR93 Snow Blower ‐ ‐ ‐ 110,000 ‐ ‐ STR94 Mastic Patch Machine ‐ ‐ ‐ 70,000 ‐ ‐ STR98 REPLACE #3223‐LIGHT DUTY 35,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR99 REPLACE #3250‐LIGHT DUTY 45,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR100 REPLACE #1438‐LIGHT DUTY ‐ 45,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR101 REPLACE #3484‐LIGHT DUTY ‐ 40,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR102 Tandem Axle Dump Truck with Plows & Sanders ‐ 260,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR103 Hawk Signal at New BHS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 110,000 ‐ STR104 Bridger Creek Stabilization ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 STR105 Pavement Condition Assessment 200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STR106 Asphalt Roller ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ STR107 Pavement Marking Striper ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 37,000 ‐ STR109 Toolcat Utility Vehicle ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 65,000 ‐ STR110 Portable Emulsion Tank ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 38,000 ‐ STR111 Paint Truck ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 STR112 Spray Patch Truck ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ GF346 Facility Condition Inventory ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 975 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,392,000 2,802,789 1,922,000 1,936,000 2,395,975 300,000 256 449 STREET MAINTENANCE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The Streets Maintenance fund is special revenue fund that relies on assessments for revenue generation for street maintenance and reconstruction. The last couple of years the Street Maintenance fund budgets increased amounts of pavement maintenance capital projects, and the addition of Streets workers, which make up the large portion of the increased expenditures. Over the past five fiscal years, the assessment has been increased to help fund the road maintenance. For the plan going forward we have estimated a small increase of 2% a year: $5,603,985 $5,716,065 $5,830,386 $5,946,994 $6,065,934 $5,300,000 $5,400,000 $5,500,000 $5,600,000 $5,700,000 $5,800,000 $5,900,000 $6,000,000 $6,100,000 $6,200,000 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Total Estimated Revenues 257 450 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Significant increases in Pavement Maintenance projects over the next 5 years are scheduled including mill and overlay as well as chip seal projects just under $1,000,000 annually and maintenance and rehabilitation projects for the next 2 years is just under $1,000,000. Routine replacement of equipment such as graders, sweepers, trucks, plows, etc. in the normal course of street maintenance are included. Several replacement vehicles and equipment were added to the fifth year of the plan. Added to FY21 is the Pavement Condition Assessment, which was last don in 2013. This update of the assessment will allow us to prioritize reconstruction projects so our maintenance funds can be used on streets that can still benefit from maintenance. In addition, every year the Street Maintenance fund has allocation of $25,000 annually has been increased to $50,000 for bike path improvements (STR20) and some additional project are planned n FY20 increase the amount that aids in our efforts towards the Strategic Plan 4.5 a Enhance Non‐motorized Transportation. 258 451 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENTS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM WOULD PROVIDE FOR BIKE‐RELATED ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RACK ‐ SIGNS, STRIPING, CURB CUTS, & SEPARATED PATHWAYS. ‐ THE 2017 TRANSPORTATION PLAN RECOMMENDS BIKE ‐ FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND THE BOZEMAN AREA BICYCLE ‐ ADVISORY BOARD WILL PROVIDE THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. ‐ ADDVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SAFETY WILL LIKELY BE IMPROVED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENTS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM WOULD PROVIDE FOR BIKE‐RELATED ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING , BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ‐ RACKS, SIGNS, STRIPING, CURB‐CUTS, AND SEPARATED ‐ PATHWAYS. THE 2017 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ RECOMMENDS BIKE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE BOZEMAN AREA ‐ BICYCLE ADVISORY BOARD (BABAB) WILL PROVIDE THE ‐ CITY WITH THEIR PRIORITY LIST. THE MONEY CAN BE ‐ COMBINED WITH STREET RESURFACING PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SAFETY WILL LIKELY BE IMPROVED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ Annual Bike Path Improvement 2021 50,000 STR20 (FY21) Annual Bike Path Improvement 2022 50,000 STR20 (FY22) 259 452 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENTS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM WOULD PROVIDE FOR BIKE‐RELATED ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ‐ RACKS, SIGNS, STRIPING, CURB‐CUTS, AND SEPARATED ‐ PATHWAYS. THE 2017 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ INCLUDED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ‐ BICYCLE FACILITYS. THE BOZEMAN AREA BICYCLE ‐ ADVISORY BOARD (BABAB) WILL PROVIDE THE CITY WITH ‐ THEIR PRIORITY LIST. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SAFETY WILL LIKELY BE IMPROVED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NO ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS. ‐ ANNUAL BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENTS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR BIKE‐RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RACKS, SIGNS, ‐ STRIPING, CURB CUTS & SEPARATED PATHWAYS. THE 2017 ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDS BICYCLE ‐ FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND THE BOZEMAN AREA BICYCLE ‐ ADVISORY BOARD (BABAB) PROVIDES THE CITY WITH A ‐ PRIORITY LIST. THIS MONEY CAN BE COMBINED WITH ‐ STREET RESURFACING PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SAFETY WILL LIKELY BE IMPROVED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ Annual Bike Path Improvement 2024 STR20 (FY24) 50,000 Annual Bike Path Improvement 2023 50,000 STR20 (FY23) 260 453 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENTS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR BIKE‐RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RACKS, SIGNS, ‐ STRIPING, CURB CUTS & SEPARATED PATHWAYS. THE 2017 ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDS BICYCLE ‐ FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND THE BOZEMAN AREA BICYCLE ‐ ADVISORY BOARD (BABAB) PROVIDES THE CITY WITH A ‐ PRIORITY LIST. THIS MONEY CAN BE COMBINED WITH ‐ STREET RESURFACING PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SAFETY WILL LIKELY BE IMPROVED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ GRADER LEASE 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF 2003 ‐ GRADING THE RESIDENTIAL STREETS IS CRITICAL TO ‐ SAFE TRAVEL OF OUR CITIZENS. PULLING THE SNOW OUT ‐ FROM THE CURB SO IT CAN BE BLOWN INTO TRUCKS AND ‐ HAULED AWAY IS IMPORTANT TO PARKING IN THE ‐ DOWNTOWN AND OTHER BUSINESS AREAS. THESE GRADERS ‐ WILL BE ALL‐WHEEL DRIVE, WHICH INCREASES OUR ‐ PRODUCTIVITY. NEWER EQUIPMENT HAS FEWER BREAKDOWNS ‐ AND BETTER FUEL ECONOMY WHICH MEANS LESS TIME IN ‐ THE SHOP AND FUELING DURING A SHIFT. THE OLD ‐ GRADER WOULD BE TRADED IN OR AUCTIONED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY 5 YEARS TO PURCHASE. CUT BACK ON ‐ OUR USE OF GRADERS IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. ‐ CONTINUE TO USE WHAT WE HAVE AND REPLACE WHEN WE ‐ HAVE COMPLETE FAILURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH MORE RELIABLE AND FUEL EFFICIENT EQUIPMENT. ‐ Grader Lease STR22 (FY21) 2021 60,000 Annual Bike Path Improvement 2025 50,000 STR20 (FY25) 261 454 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GRADER LEASE 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AT A MINIMUM,A 20YR ‐ REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OUR GRADERS. CURRENTLY ‐ GRADING THE RESIDENTIAL STREETS IS CRITICAL ‐ TO SAFE TRAVEL OF OUR CITIZENS. PULLING THE SNOW ‐ OUT FROM THE CURB SO IT CAN BE BLOWN INTO TRUCKS ‐ AND HAULED AWAY IS IMPORTANT TO PARKING IN THE ‐ DOWNTOWN AND OTHER BUSINESS AREAS. THESE GRADERS ‐ WILL BE ALL‐WHEEL DRIVE, WHICH INCREASES OUR ‐ PRODUCTIVITY. NEWER EQUIPMENT HAS FEWER BREAKDOWNS ‐ AND BETTER FUEL ECONOMY WHICH MEANS LESS TIME IN ‐ THE SHOP AND FUELING DURING A SHIFT. THE OLD ‐ GRADER WOULD BE TRADED IN OR AUCTIONED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY 5 YEARS TO PURCHASE. CUT BACK ON ‐ OUR USE OF GRADERS IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. ‐ CONTINUE TO USE WHAT WE HAVE AND REPLACE WHEN WE ‐ HAVE COMPLETE FAILURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH MORE RELIABLE AND FUEL EFFICIENT EQUIPMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASE IN MAINTENANCE COSTS DUE TO NEWER ‐ EQUIPMENT. ‐ Grader Lease 2022 60,000 STR22 (FY22) 262 455 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GRADER LEASE 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AT A MINIMUM A 20YR ‐ REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OUR GRADERS. THIS IS THE ‐ REPLACEMENT OF THE 2014 GRADER. GRADING THE ‐ RESIDENTIAL STREETS IS CRITICAL TO SAFE TRAVEL ‐ OF OUR CITIZENS. PULLING THE SNOW OUT FROM THE ‐ CURB SO IT CAN BE BLOWN INTO TRUCKS AND HAULED ‐ AWAY IS IMPORTANT TO PARKING IN THE DOWNTOWN AND ‐ OTHER BUSINESS AREAS. THESE GRADERS WILL BE ‐ ALL‐WHEEL DRIVE, WHICH INCREASES OUR PRODUCTIVITY. ‐ NEWER EQUIPMENT HAS FEWER BREAKDOWNS AND BETTER ‐ FUEL ECONOMY WHICH MEANS LESS TIME IN THE SHOP AND ‐ FUELING DURING A SHIFT. THE OLD GRADER WOULD BE ‐ TRADED IN OR AUCTIONED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY 5 YEARS TO PURCHASE. CUT BACK ON ‐ OUR USE OF GRADERS IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. ‐ CONTINUE TO USE WHAT WE HAVE AND REPLACE WHEN WE ‐ HAVE COMPLETE FAILURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH MORE RELIABLE AND FUEL EFFICIENT EQUIPMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASE IN COSTS DUE TO NEWER EQUIPMENT. ‐ Grader Lease 2023 60,000 STR22 (FY23) 263 456 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GRADER LEASE 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AT A MINIMUM A 20 ‐ YEAR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OUR GRADERS. GRADING ‐ THE RESIDENTIAL STREETS IS CRITICAL TO SAFE TRAVEL ‐ OF OUR CITIZENS. PULLING THE SNOW OUT FROM THE ‐ CURB SO IT CAN BE BLOWN INTO TRUCKS AND HAULED ‐ AWAY IS IMPORTANT TO PARKING IN THE DOWNTOWN AND ‐ OTHER BUSINESS AREAS. THESE GRADERS WILL BE ALL‐ ‐ WHEEL DRIVE, WHICH INCREASES OUR PRODUCTIVITY. ‐ NEWER EQUIPMENT HAS FEWER BREAKDOWNS AND BETTER ‐ FUEL ECONOMY WHICH MEANS LESS TIME IN THE SHOP & ‐ FUELING DURING A SHIFT. THE OLD GRADER WOULD BE ‐ TRADED IN OR AUCTIONED. ‐ GRADER LEASE 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ GRADING THE RESIDENTIAL STREETS IS CRITICAL TO ‐ SAFE TRAVEL OF OUR CITIZENS. PULLING THE SNOW OUT ‐ FROM THE CURB SO IT CAN BE BLOWN INTO TRUCKS AND ‐ HAULED AWAY IS IMPORTANT TO PARKING IN THE ‐ DOWNTOWN AND OTHER BUSINESS AREAS. THESE GRADERS ‐ WILL BE ALL‐WHEEL DRIVE, WHICH INCREASES OUR ‐ PRODUCTIVITY. NEWER EQUIPMENT HAS FEWER BREAKDOWNS ‐ AND BETTER FUEL ECONOMY WHICH MEANS LESS TIME IN ‐ IN THE SHOP AND FUELING DURING A SHIFT. THE OLD ‐ GRADER WOULD BE TRADED IN OR AUCTIONED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 300K EVERY 5 YEARS TO PURCHASE. CUT BACK ON ‐ OUR USE OF GRADERS IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. ‐ CONTINUE TO USE WHAT WE HAVE AND REPLACE WHEN WE ‐ HAVE COMPLETE FAILURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH MORE RELIABLE AND FUEL EFFICIENT EQUIPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASE IN COSTS DUE TO NEWER EQUIPMENT. ‐ Grader Lease 2025 60,000 STR22 (FY25) Grader Lease 2024 60,000 STR22 (FY24) 264 457 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL MEDIAN & BOULEVARD MAINTENANCE 65,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE ‐ OF BOZEMAN'S MEDIANS. THIS INCLUDES SPRINKLER ‐ INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE, LANDSCAPING, MOWING, ‐ AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE OF BOZEMAN'S MEDIANS ‐ AND BOULEVARDS. ANNUAL INCREASES ARE DUE TO ‐ EXPECTED GROWTH. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES TO APPROVAL: ‐ MAKING OUR CURRENTLY UNMAINTAINED MEDIANS INTO ‐ WEED FREE LOW MAINTENANCE SHOW PIECES. WE ARE ‐ PARTNERING WITH THE WATER CONSERVATION ‐ DIVISION TO INSTALL LOW WATER, EASILY MAINTAINED ‐ MEDIANS. ALSO CONTRACT OUT THE MAINTENANCE ON ‐ OUR ESTABLISHED MEDIANS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE. LOWER WATER USE MEANS LOWER UTILITY COSTS. ‐ ANNUAL MEDIAN & BOULEVARD MAINTENANCE 70,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE ‐ OF BOZEMAN'S MEDIANS & BOULEVARDS. WORK INCLUDES ‐ SPRINKLER INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE, LANDSCAPING, ‐ MOWING & GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ANNUAL INCREASES ARE ‐ DUE TO EXPECTED GROWTH. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAKING OUR CURRENTLY UNMAINTAINED MEDIANS INTO ‐ WEED FREE LOW MAINTENANCE SHOW PIECES. WE ARE ‐ PARTNERING WITH THE WATER CONSERVATION DIVISION TO ‐ DESIGN & INSTALL LOW WATER, EASILY MAINTAINED ‐ MEDIANS. ‐ NONE. LOWER WATER USE MEANS LOWER UTILITY COSTS. ‐ Annual Median & Boulevard 2021 65,000 STR30 (FY21) Annual Median & Boulevard 2022 70,000 STR30 (FY22) 265 458 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL MEDIAN & BOULEVARD MAINTENANCE 75,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE ‐ OF BOZEMAN'S MEDIANS & BOULEVARDS. WORK INCLUDES ‐ SPRINKLER INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE, LANDSCAPING, ‐ MOWING, AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ANNUAL INCREASES ‐ ARE DUE TO EXPECTED GROWTH. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAKING OUR CURRENTLY UNMAINTAINED MEDIANS INTO ‐ WEED FREE LOW MAINTENANCE SHOW PIECES. WE ARE ‐ PARTNERING WITH THE WATER CONSERVATION DIVISION TO ‐ DESIGN AND INSTALL LOW WATER, EASILY MAINTAINED ‐ MEDIANS. ALSO CONTRACT OUT THE MAINTENANCE ON OUR ‐ ESTABLISHED MEDIANS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE. LOWER WATER USE MEANS LOWER UTILITY COSTS. ‐ ANNUAL MEDIAN & BOULEVARD MAINTENANCE 80,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE ‐ OF BOZEMAN'S MEDIANS & BOULEVARDS. WORK INCLUDES ‐ SPRINKLER INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE, LANDSCAPING, ‐ MOWING, AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ANNUAL INCREASES ‐ ARE DUE TO EXPECTED GROWTH. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAKING OUR CURRENTLY UNMAINTAINED MEDIANS INTO ‐ WEED FREE, LOW MAINTENANCE SHOW PIECES. WE ARE ‐ PARTNERING INTERNALLY WITH WATER CONSERVATION ‐ TO DESIGN AND INSTALL LOW WATER, EASILY MAINTAINED ‐ MEDIANS. ALSO CONTRACT OUT THE MAINTENANCE OF OUR ‐ ESTABLISHED MEDIANS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ Annual Median & Boulevard 2023 75,000 STR30 (FY23) Annual Median & Boulevard 2024 80,000 STR30 (FY24) 266 459 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL MEDIAN & BOULEVARD MAINTENANCE 85,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE ‐ OF BOZEMAN'S MEDIANS & BOULEVARDS. WORK INCLUDES ‐ SPRINKLER INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE, LANDSCAPING, ‐ MOWING, AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ANNUAL INCREASES ‐ ARE DUE TO EXPECTED GROWTH. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MAKING OUR CURRENTLY UNMAINTAINED MEDIANS INTO ‐ WEED FREE, LOW MAINTENANCE SHOW PIECES. WE ARE ‐ PARTNERING INTERNALLY WITH WATER CONSERVATION ‐ TO DESIGN AND INSTALL LOW WATER, EASILY MAINTAINED ‐ MEDIANS. ALSO CONTRACT OUT THE MAINTENANCE OF OUR ‐ ESTABLISHED MEDIANS. ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE. LOWER WATER USE MEANS LOWER UTILITY COSTS. ‐ Annual Median & Boulevard 2025 85,000 STR30 (FY25) 267 460 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SWEEPERS 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS FOR LEASING OR PURCHASING SWEEPERS THROUGH ‐ THE MACI EQUIPMENT PURCHASE PROGRAM. THESE ARE ‐ MECHANICAL SWEEPERS THAT IF NECESSARY CAN BE ‐ OPERATED WITHOUT USING WATER. INDUSTRY STANDARDS ‐ SHOW IT IS BEST TO REPLACE MUNICIPAL SWEEPERS AT 5 ‐ YEARS. WE ARE ABLE TO GET ABOUT 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ OUR EXCELLENT MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. THE CITY'S ‐ MS4 STORMWATER PERMITTING REQUIRES SWEEPING UP ‐ SAND AND DIRT BEFORE IT CAN ENTER WATERWAYS. ‐ HEAVY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REQUIRES ADDITIONAL ‐ SWEEPING IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS. SWEEPERS ARE VERY ‐ HIGH MAINTENANCE AS THEY AGE. ‐ WITH THE MACI PROGRAM, THEY PAY FOR 87% AND WE ‐ PAY 13% FOR A SWEEPER. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY YEAR UNTIL ALL SWEEPERS ARE ‐ REPLACED. CUT BACK ON OUR SWEEPING THERE ARE NO ‐ LOCAL CONTRACTORS AT THIS TIME. CONTINUE TO USE ‐ WHAT WE HAVE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH IMPROVED OPERATIONS. BETTER AIR QUALITY. ‐ IMPROVED STORM WATER DISCHARGE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ Sweepers 2021 100,000 STR34 (FY21) 268 461 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SWEEPERS 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS FOR LEASING OR PURCHASING SWEEPERS THROUGH ‐ THE MACI EQUIPMENT PURCHASE PROGRAM. THESE ARE ‐ MECHANICAL SWEEPERS THAT IF NECESSARY CAN BE ‐ OPERATED WITHOUT USING WATER. INDUSTRY STANDARDS ‐ SHOW IT IS BEST TO REPLACE MUNICIPAL SWEEPERS AT 5 ‐ YEARS. WE ARE ABLE TO GET ABOUT 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ OUR EXCELLENT MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. THE CITY'S MS4 ‐ STORMWATER PERMITTING REQUIRES SWEEPING UP SAND ‐ AND DIRT BEFORE IT CAN ENTER WATERWAYS. HEAVY ‐ DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REQUIRES ADDITIONAL ‐ SWEEPING IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS. SWEEPERS ARE VERY ‐ HIGH MAINTENANCE AS THEY AGE. WITH THE MACI ‐ PROGRAM, THEY PAY FOR 87% AND WE PAY 13% FOR A ‐ SWEEPER. IF WE ARE CHOSEN, WE WOULD USE OUR LEASE ‐ PAYMENT TO FUND OUR SHARE OF THE COST WHICH WOULD ‐ BE $34,000. ‐ ALTERNAIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY YEAR UNTIL ALL SWEEPERS ARE ‐ REPLACED. CUT BACK ON OUR SWEEPING. THERE ARE NO ‐ LOCAL CONTRACTORS AT THIS TIME. CONTINUE TO USE ‐ WHAT WE HAVE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH IMPROVED OPERATIONS. BETTER AIR QUALITY. ‐ IMPROVED STORM WATER DISCHARGE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COTS: ‐ NONE ‐ Sweepers 2022 100,000 STR34 (FY22) 269 462 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SWEEPERS 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS FOR LEASING OR PURCHASING SWEEPERS THROUGH ‐ THE MACI EQUIPMENT PURCHASE PROGRAM. THESE ARE ‐ MECHANICAL SWEEPERS THAT IF NECESSARY CAN BE ‐ OPERATED WITHOUT USING WATER. INDUSTRY STANDARDS ‐ SHOW IT IS BEST TO REPLACE MUNICIPAL SWEEPERS AT ‐ 5 YEARS. WE ARE ABLE TO GET ABOUT 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ OUR EXCELLENT MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. THE CITY'S MS4 ‐ STORMWATER PERMITTING REQUIRES SWEEPING UP SAND ‐ AND DIRT BEFORE IT CAN ENTER WATERWAYS. HEAVY ‐ DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REQUIRES ADDITIONAL SWEEPING ‐ IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS. SWEEPERS ARE VERY HIGH ‐ MAINTENANCE AS THEY AGE. WITH THE MACI PROGRAM, ‐ THEY PAY FOR 87% AND WE PAY 13% FOR A SWEEPER. IF ‐ WE ARE CHOSEN, WE WOULD USE OUR LEASE PAYMENT TO ‐ FUND OUR SHARE OF THE COST WHICH WOULD BE ~$34,000 ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY YEAR UNTIL ALL SWEEPERS ARE ‐ REPLACED. CUT BACK ON OUR SWEEPING. THERE ARE NO ‐ LOCAL CONTRACTORS AT THIS TIME. CONTINUE TO USE ‐ WHAT WE HAVE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH IMPROVED OPERATIONS. BETTER AIR QUALITY. ‐ IMPROVED STORM WATER DISCHARGE. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ Sweepers 2023 100,000 STR34 (FY23) 270 463 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SWEEPERS 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS FOR THE LEASING OR PURCHASING OF SWEEPERS ‐ THROUGH THE MACI (MONTANA AIR & CONGESTION ‐ INITIATIVE) EQUIPMENT PURCHASE PROGRAM. THESE ARE ‐ MECHANICAL SWEEPERS THAT IF NECESSARY CAN BE ‐ OPERATED WITHOUT USING WATER. INDUSTRY STANDARDS ‐ SHOW IT IS BEST TO REPLACE MUNICIPAL SWEEPERS AT ‐ 5 YEARS. WE ARE ABLE TO GET ABOUT 10 YEARS DUE TO ‐ OUR EXCELLENT MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. THE CITY'S MS4 ‐ STORMWATER PERMITTING REQUIRES SWEEPING UP SAND & ‐ DIRT BEFORE IT CAN ENTER WATERWAYS. CLEAN STREETS/ ‐ BIKE LANES ARE A QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUE. WE ARE ‐ REQUIRED TO MEET THE GOAL OF SWEEPING ALL LOCAL ‐ STREETS TWICE PER YEAR, MONTHLY SWEEPING OF ALL ‐ ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADWAYS & WEEKLY SWEEPING ‐ OF MAIN STREET, MOST BIKE LANES WEEKLY DURING THE ‐ SUMMER. HEAVY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REQUIRES ‐ ADDITIONAL SWEEPING IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS. ‐ SWEEPERS ARE VERY HIGH MAINTENANCE AS THEY AGE. ‐ LEASE TERMS FOR SWEEPERS ARE A MAXIMUM OF 5 YEARS ‐ DUE TO LIFE EXPECTANCY. WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE ‐ 3RD YEAR OF ONE LEASE. WE SUBMIT EVERY YEAR TO THE ‐ MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S MACI ‐ EQUIPMENT PURCHASE PROGRAM WHICH PAYS 87% AND WE ‐ PAY 13% FOR A SWEEPER. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY YEAR UNTIL ALL SWEEPERS ARE ‐ REPLACED. CUT BACK ON OUR SWEEPING BUT THERE ARE ‐ NO LOCAL CONTRACTORS AT THIS TIME. CONTINUE TO ‐ USE WHAT WE HAVE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH IMPROVED OPERATIONS. BETTER AIR QUALITY. ‐ IMPROVED STORM WATER DISCHARGE. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ Sweepers 2024 100,000 STR34 (FY24) 271 464 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SWEEPERS 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ LEASE TWO STREET SWEEPERS. NORMAL LIFE SPAN ‐ IS 5 YEARS AND LEASES ARE 6 PAYMENTS OVER 6 YRS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES ARE $250,000 PURCHASE. OPERATING ‐ COSTS VARY BY USE BUT ARE HIGH DUE TO THE HARSH ‐ ENVIRONMENT OF STREET SWEEPING. ONGOING CIP ‐ EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ BUDGET 250K EVERY YEAR UNTIL ALL SWEEPERS ARE ‐ REPLACED. CUT BACK ON OUR SWEEPING BUT THERE ARE ‐ NO LOCAL CONTRACTORS AT THIS TIME. CONTINUE TO ‐ USE WHAT WE HAVE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MUCH IMPROVED OPERATIONS. BETTER AIR QUALITY. ‐ IMPROVED STORM WATER DISCHARGE. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DUMP TRUCK WITH PLOW & SANDER ‐ 2 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE 1990 DUMP TRUCK WILL BE 28 YEARS OLD WITH 82K ‐ IN TOWN MILES AND OVER 10,000 HOURS. PARTS HAVE ‐ BEEN DISCONTINUED. WE HAVE HAD TO PATCH THE ‐ LEAKING GAS TANK BECAUSE A REPLACEMENT IS NOT ‐ AVAILABLE. WHEN THE OTHER RUSTED SPOTS START ‐ LEAKING WE WILL BE FORCED TO PARK THE TRUCK. THE ‐ MOTOR IS SO TIRED THAT WE ARE REMOVING THE PLOW ‐ THIS WINTER BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE THE POWER TO ‐ PLOW AND SAND UPHILL. WE AVERAGE ABOUT $1,200 PER ‐ YEAR IN REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE. THE RUNNING AND ‐ FLOOR BOARDS ARE RUSTED THROUGH BUT WE ARE ABLE TO ‐ COVER THEM WITH OLD MUD FLAPS TO MAKE IT DRIVABLE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH THE OLD MODEL. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EFFICIENCY, LESS EMISSIONS, SAFETY, FUEL SAVINGS ‐ AND MORE RELIABLE EQUIPMENT. ‐ Dump Truck Plow Sander 2021 200,000 STR40 (FY21) Sweepers 2025 100,000 STR34 (FY25) 272 465 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DUMP TRUCK WITH PLOW & SANDER ‐ 2 210,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE 1993 UNDERPOWERED GASOLINE ENGINE DUMP ‐ TRUCK THAT AVERAGES ABOUT 3 MPG WHEN USED FOR ‐ PLOWING OPERATIONS. THE NEW TRUCK COULD BE FUELED ‐ WITH ALTERNATIVE FUELS SUCH AS BIODIESEL. ‐ REMOVING THIS FROM OUR FLEET WILL HELP US REACH ‐ OUR GOAL OF REDUCING MUNICIPAL GREENHOUSE EMISSION ‐ 15% BELOW 2000 LEVELS BY 2020. THIS TRUCK WILL ‐ ALSO BE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH 1993 MODEL. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ EFFICIENCY, LESS EMISSIONS, SAFETY, FUEL SAVINGS ‐ AND MORE RELIABLE EQUIPMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ SANDERS 27,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SANDERS ARE USED IN A VERY CORROSIVE AND ABRASIVE ‐ ENVIRONMENT. WE REBUILD THE CONVEYOR & HYDRAULIC ‐ SYSTEM IN THE FIRST 4 YEARS. IF WE DON'T HAVE A ‐ CATASTROPHIC FAILURE IN THE NEXT 2‐3 YEARS, THE V ‐ AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS START TO FAIL IN THE ‐ 7TH YEAR. IF WE CAN'T PUT DOWN SAND OR DEICER ‐ DURING THE WINTER, WE FAIL TO SERVICE OUR ‐ CITIZENS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MORE RELIABLE SANDERS. LESS FAILURES IN THE MIDDLE ‐ OF A STORM. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASE IN MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ Sanders 2021 27,000 STR49 (FY21) Dump Truck Plow Sander 2023 210,000 STR40 (FY23) 273 466 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SANDERS 27,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SANDERS ARE USED IN A VERY CORROSIVE AND ABRASIVE ‐ ENVIRONMENT. WE REBUILD THE CONVEYOR AND ‐ HYDRAULIC SYSTEM IN THE FIRST 4 YEARS. IF WE DON'T ‐ HAVE A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE IN THE NEXT 2‐3 YEARS, ‐ THE V BOX AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS START TO FAIL ‐ IN THE 7TH YEAR. BY REPLACING THE SANDER EVERY 8 ‐ YEARS. IF WE CAN'T PUT DOWN SAND OR DEICER DURING ‐ THE WINTER, WE FAIL TO SERVICE OUR CITIZENS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MORE RELIABLE SANDERS. LESS FAILURES IN THE MIDDLE ‐ OF A STORM. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASE IN MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ SANDERS 27,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SANDERS ARE USED IN A VERY CORROSIVE AND ABRASIVE ‐ ENVIRONMENT. WE REBUILD THE CONVEYOR AND ‐ HYDRAULIC SYSTEM IN THE FIRST 4 YEARS. IF WE DON'T ‐ HAVE A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE IN THE NEXT 2‐3 YEARS, ‐ THE V BOX AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS START TO FAIL ‐ IN THE 7TH YEAR. IF WE CAN'T PUT DOWN SAND OR ‐ DEICER DURING THE WINTER, WE FAIL TO SERVICE OUR ‐ CITIZENS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MORE RELIABLE SANDERS. LESS FAILURES IN THE MIDDLE ‐ OF A STORM. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASE IN MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ Sanders 2023 27,000 STR49 (FY23) Sanders 2022 27,000 STR49 (FY22) 274 467 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SANDERS 27,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SANDERS ARE USED IN A VERY CORROSIVE AND ABRASIVE ‐ ENVIRONMENT. WE REBUILD THE CONVEYOR & HYDRAULIC ‐ SYSTEM IN THE FIRST 4 YEARS. IF WE DON'T HAVE A ‐ CATASTROPHIC FAILURE IN THE NEXT 2‐3 YEARS, THE V ‐ BOX & STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS START TO FAIL IN THE ‐ 7TH YEAR. BY REPLACING THE SANDER EVERY 8 YEARS ‐ (WE NOW HAVE 8 SANDERS), WE CAN AVOID HAVING A ‐ SEASON ENDING FAILURE. SANDERS ARE ABOUT 6 MONTHS ‐ OUT WHEN ORDERING SO WE WOULD NEVER GET A NEW ONE ‐ IN THE SAME SEASON THAT WE NEEDED A REPLACEMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MORE RELIABLE SANDERS. LESS FAILURES IN THE MIDDLE ‐ OF A STORM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DECREASE IN MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ Sanders 2024 27,000 STR49 (FY24) 275 468 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK WITH PLOW & SANDER 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO REPLACE A 1994 TANDEM AXLE ‐ TRUCK WITH 128,000 MILES AND OVER 11,000 HOURS. ‐ IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE GET THE ARTERIALS AND ‐ COLLECTORS PLOWED AND SANDED BEFORE 8 AM. WHEN A ‐ TANDEM AXLE 10 YARD TRUCK IS DOWN FOR ANY PERIOD ‐ OF TIME, THE BACKUP IS A 1990 GAS ENGINE SINGLE ‐ AXLE 4 YARD TRUCK WHICH TAKES TWICE AS LONG TO ‐ FINISH A ROUTE IF IT STAYS IN OPERATION FOR THE ‐ ENTIRE SHIFT. NOT ACCEPTABLE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. ‐ WITH THE WIDENING OF MULTIPLE COLLECTORS AND ‐ ARTERIALS, THE CONTINUED NEED FOR A LARGER ‐ CAPACITY TRUCK TO FINISH PLOW AND SANDING ROUTINES ‐ IS CRITICAL TO MAINTAINING OUR SERVICE TO THE ‐ TRAVELING PUBLIC. DURING PAVING OPERATIONS, BEING ‐ ABLE TO HAUL TWICE AS MUCH ASPHALT CUTS DOWN ON ‐ THE NUMBER OF TRIPS TO THE ASPHALT PLANT. THIS ‐ MAKES THE PAVING CREW MORE EFFICIENT AND USES ‐ LESS FUEL. THE 1994 TRUCK WOULD BE USED AS A ‐ BACKUP IN THE WINTER AND STILL BE USED FOR PAVING ‐ INSTEAD OF A SINGLE‐AXLE TRUCK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH NO TANDEM BACK UP IN THE WINTER. RUN ‐ SINGLE AXLE 4 YARD DUMP TRUCKS WITH ASPHALT ‐ OPERATIONS. ‐ BICYCLE ADVISORY BOARD (BABAB) WILL PROVIDE THE ‐ CITY WITH THEIR PRIORITY LIST. THE MONEY CAN BE ‐ COMBINED WITH STREET RESURFACING PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ Tandem Axle Dump Truck 2022 250,000 STR58 276 469 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION 550,000 (MILL & OVERLAY) ‐ FY21 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ MILL AND OVERLAYS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO MILL AND ‐ OVERLAY 1.9 MILES IN FY21. THIS INCLUDES ‐ SIMMENTAL WAY FROM BAXTER NORTH, AND DURSTON FROM ‐ HANSON TO 19TH. THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE LANE ‐ STRIPING ENHANCEMENTS WITH SOME PROJECTS, AND THEY ‐ WILL BE COORDINATED WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY ‐ OF BOZEMAN. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & 913,329 REHABILITATION (MILL & OVERLAY) ‐ FY22 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ MILL AND OVERLAYS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO MILL ‐ AND OVERLAY 2.5 MILES IN FY22. THIS INCLUDES N ‐ CHURCH FROM LAMME TO PEACH, S 3RD FROM KAGY TO ‐ GRAF, W GRAF FROM S 3RD TO S 3RD, AND S 3RD FROM ‐ GRAF TO GOLDENSTEIN. THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE ‐ LANE STRIPING ENHANCEMENTS WITH SOME PROJECTS, AND ‐ THEY WILL BE COORDINATED WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY ‐ OF BOZEMAN. ‐ Maintenance & Rehabilitation (Mill & Overlay) 2021 550,000 STR71 (FY21) Maintenance & Rehabilitation (Mill & Overlay) 2022 913,329 STR71 (FY22) 277 470 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & 1,035,000 REHABILITATION (MILL & OVERLAY) ‐ FY23 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ MILL AND OVERLAYS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO MILL AND ‐ OVERLAY 5.5 MILES IN FY23. THIS INCLUDES: WESTGLEN ‐ SUBDIVISION, MICHAELS GROVE FROM BABCOCK TO ‐ DURSTON, HUNTERS WAY FROM BABCOCK TO DURSTON, ‐ GREENWAY SUBDIVISION, N 25TH FROM BABCOCK TO ‐ DURSTON, N 24TH FROM BABCOCK TO BEALL, N 11TH FROM ‐ DICKERSON TO KOCH, S 13TH FROM DICKERSON TO KOCH, ‐ AND S 12TH FROM DICKERSON TO KOCH. THERE IS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY ‐ OF BOZEMAN. ‐ STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION 495,000 MILL & OVERLAY ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ MILL AND OVERLAYS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO MILL & ‐ OVERLAY 2.4 MILES IN FY24. THIS INCLUDES CHURCH ‐ FROM KAGY TO MAIN (EXCLUDING THE RECONSTRUCTED ‐ SEGMENT FROM OLIVE TO BABCOCK), N 9TH FROM MAIN TO ‐ DURSTON, AND N 10TH FROM MAIN TO DURSTON. THERE IS ‐ POTENTIAL FOR BIKE LANE STRIPING ENHANCEMENTS ‐ WITH SOME PROJECTS, AND THEY WILL BE COORDINATED ‐ WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ Maintenance & Rehabilitation (Mill & Overlay) 2023 1,035,000 STR71 (FY23) Maintenance & Rehabilitation (Mill & Overlay) 2024 495,000 STR71 (FY24) 278 471 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION 980,000 MILL & OVERLAY ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ MILL AND OVERLAYS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO MILL & ‐ OVERLAY 2.05 MILES IN FY25. THIS INCLUDES DURSTON ‐ FROM 19TH TO MERIWETHER, N CHURCH FROM PEACH TO ‐ LAMME, AND S 3RD FROM GRAF TO WAGONWHEEL. THERE ‐ IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE LANE STRIPING ENHANCEMENTS ‐ WITH SOME PROJECTS AND THEY WILL BE COORDINATED ‐ WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ANNUAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ANNUAL PROGRAM PROVIDES FUNDING TO CONTINUE ‐ UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO ADA COMPLIANCE. A ‐ CURB/PEDESTRIAN RAMP PROVIDES AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ‐ THAT PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CAN USE TO SAFELY ‐ TRANSITION FROM A ROADWAY TO A CURBED SIDEWALK & ‐ VICE VERSA. WITHOUT ACCESS TO PROPERLY DEVELOPED ‐ RAMPS ONTO SIDEWALKS, PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ‐ ARE FORCED TO RISK THEIR PERSONAL SAFETY BY ‐ TRAVELING IN THE STREET. UPGRADING COB ‐ PEDESTRIAN RAMPS WILL ALLOW THE CITY TO BE IN ‐ COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE II OF THE ADA AND SECTION ‐ 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE, AND NOT ‐ MEET CURRENT ADA REGULATORY STANDARDS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UPGRADING THE CURB RAMPS WILL INCREASE SAFETY FOR ‐ COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND VISITORS WITH DISABILITIES. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ Annual Pedestrian Ramp Repair 2021 100,000 STR75 (FY21) Maintenance & Rehabilitation (Mill & Overlay) 2025 980,000 STR71 (FY25) 279 472 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ANNUAL PROGRAM PROVIDES FUNDING TO CONTINUE ‐ UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO ADA COMPLIANCE. A ‐ CURB/PEDESTRIAN RAMP PROVIDES AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ‐ THAT PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CAN USE TO SAFELY ‐ TRANSITION FROM A ROADWAY TO A CURBED SIDEWALK AND ‐ VICE VERSA. WITHOUT ACCESS TO PROPERLY DEVELOPED ‐ RAMPS ONTO SIDEWALKS, PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ARE ‐ FORCED TO RISK THEIR PERSONAL SAFETY BY TRAVELING ‐ IN THE STREET. UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS WILL ‐ ALLOW THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE II ‐ OF THE ADA AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ‐ ACT OF 1973. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND NOT ‐ MEET CURRENT ADA REGULATORY STANDARDS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UPGRADING THE CURB RAMPS WILL INCREASE SAFETY FOR ‐ COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND VISITORS WITH DISABILITIES. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NO ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS. ‐ Annual Pedestrian Ramp Repair 2022 100,000 STR75 (FY22) 280 473 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ANNUAL PROGRAM PROVIDES FUNDING TO CONTINUE ‐ UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO ADA COMPLIANCE. ‐ A CURB/PEDESTRIAN RAMP PROVIDES AN ACCESSIBLE ‐ ROUTE THAT PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CAN USE TO ‐ SAFELY TRANSITION FROM A ROADWAY TO A CURBED ‐ SIDEWALK AND VICE VERSA. WITHOUT ACCESS TO ‐ PROPERLY DEVELOPED RAMPS ONTO SIDEWALKS, PEOPLE ‐ WITH DISABILITIES ARE FORCED TO RISK THEIR ‐ PERSONAL SAFETY BY TRAVELING IN THE STREET. ‐ UPGRADING COB PEDESTRAIN RAMPS WILL ALLOW THE CITY ‐ TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE II OF THE ADA AND ‐ SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE, AND NOT ‐ MEET CURRENT ADA REGULATORY STANDARDS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UPGRADING THE CURB RAMPS WILL INCREASE SAFETY FOR ‐ COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND VISITORS WITH DISABILITIES. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NO ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS. ‐ Annual Pedestrian Ramp Repair 2023 100,000 STR75 (FY23) 281 474 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ANNUAL PROGRAM PROVIDES FUNDING TO CONTINUE ‐ UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO ADA COMPLIANCE. A ‐ CURB/PEDESTRIAN RAMP PROVIDES AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ‐ THAT PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CAN USE TO SAFELY ‐ TRANSITION FROM A ROADWAY TO A CURBED SIDEWALK & ‐ VICE VERSA. WITHOUT ACCESS TO PROPERLY DEVELOPED ‐ RAMPS ONTO SIDEWALK, PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ARE ‐ FORCED TO RISK THEIR PERSONAL SAFETY BY TRAVELING ‐ IN THE STREET. UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS WILL ‐ ALLOW THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE II ‐ OF THE ADA AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ‐ ACT OF 1973. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE & NOT MEET ‐ CURRENT ADA REGULATORY STANDARDS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UPGRADING THE CURB RAMPS WILL INCREASE SAFETY FOR ‐ COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND VISITORS WITH DISABILITIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ Annual Pedestrian Ramp Repair 2024 100,000 STR75 (FY24) 282 475 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ANNUAL PROGRAM PROVIDES FUNDING TO CONTINUE ‐ UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO ADA COMPLIANCE. A ‐ CURB/PEDESTRIAN RAMP PROVIDES AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ‐ THAT PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CAN USE TO SAFELY ‐ TRANSITION FROM A ROADWAY TO A CURBED SIDEWALK & ‐ VICE VERSA. WITHOUT ACCESS TO PROPERLY DEVELOPED ‐ RAMPS ONTO SIDEWALK, PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ARE ‐ FORCED TO RISK THEIR PERSONAL SAFETY BY TRAVELING ‐ IN THE STREET. UPGRADING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS WILL ‐ ALLOW THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE II ‐ OF THE ADA AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ‐ ACT OF 1973. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE & NOT MEET ‐ CURRENT ADA REGULATORY STANDARDS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UPGRADING THE CURB RAMPS WILL INCREASE SAFETY FOR ‐ COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND VISITORS WITH DISABILITIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ Annual Pedestrian Ramp Repair 2025 100,000 STR75 (FY25) 283 476 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # N 27TH MEDIAN LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION FROM OAK 50,000 TO BAXTER ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ‐ WHICH UTILIZE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE ‐ OVERALL WATER USE ASSOCIATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE. ‐ THE LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ‐ THESE MEDIANS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR HARSH ROADWAY ‐ CONDITIONS & WILL REDUCE WATER USE & CHEMICAL WEED ‐ MITIGATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE. THESE ‐ LANDSCAPES ARE SUITED TO WITHSTAND DROUGHT EVENTS, ‐ REDUCING SOCIO‐ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM THE LOSS OF ‐ OUTDOOR LANDSCAPES. ‐ THIS PROJECT PARTNERS THE CITY'S WATER ‐ CONSERVATION DIVISION & STREET DEPARTMENT. W ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ 1) NO ACTION. MEDIANS REMAIN UNLANDSCAPED AND ‐ UNSIGHTLY, MOWING & SPRAYING WEEDS CONTINUES. ‐ 2) TRADITIONAL TURFGRASS IS INSTALLED & UNLIKE ‐ NATIVE OR LOW WATER USE SHRUBS & PERENNIALS, ‐ REQUIRES FREQUENT MOWING, FERTILIZER, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION AND, ON AVERAGE, 80% MORE WATER ‐ THAN LOW WATER USE SHRUBS & PERENNIALS. ‐ 3)CONCRETE, PAVING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS LANDSCAPING PROJECT INCLUDES: AESTHETIC ‐ BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY, A DEMONSTRATION OF ‐ DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPING, REDUCED OUTDOOR ‐ WATER USE COMPARED TO TURFGRASS MEDIANS, REDUCED ‐ CHEMICAL WEED MITIGATION, REDUCED SOCIO‐ECONOMIC ‐ IMPACTS FROM A DROUGHT EVENT, AND DEMONSTRATES THE ‐ CITY'S COMMITMENT TO WATER STEWARDSHIP. ‐ WATER STEWARDSHIP. ‐ N 27TH Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Oak to Baxter) 2021 50,000 STR83 284 477 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PLUG IN ELECTRIC WORK TRUCK. 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO ADD TO OUR FLEET AN ELECTRIC ‐ WORK PICKUP. IT WOULD BE A ½‐TON FOUR‐WHEEL DRIVE. ‐ PRODUCTION IS EXPECTED TO START IN 2018 WITH ‐ PREFERENCE GIVEN TO FLEETS. WITH AN ESTIMATED ‐ RANGE OF 80 MILES BETWEEN CHARGES, IT WOULD BE ‐ IDEAL IN OUR OPERATIONS. COST PER DAY TO CHARGE ‐ WOULD BE ABOUT $4.00. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH GAS POWERED TRUCKS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ LOWER OPERATING COSTS. LESS EMISSIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ LESS THAN GASOLINE. 240 VOLT CHARGING STATION ‐ WOULD BE NEEDED AT THE SHOPS. ‐ Plug In Electric Work Truck 2022 60,000 STR84 285 478 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE 850,000 & REHABILITATION (CHIP SEAL) ‐ FY21 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ CHIP SEALS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO CHIP ‐ SEAL 17.9 MILES IN FY21. THIS INCLUDES CITY ‐ MAINTAINED PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: ‐ BAXTER MEADOWS, FOXTAIL STREET, CATTAIL CREEK, ‐ CATTAIL LAKE, BAXTER LANE, BAXTER SQUARE, LAUREL ‐ GLEN, DIAMOND ESTATES, OAK SPRINGS, AND THOMAS ‐ DRIVE. THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE LANE STRIPING ‐ ENHANCEMENTS WITH SOME PROJECTS, AND THEY WILL BE ‐ COORDINATED WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY REPLACEMENT ‐ PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PAVEMENTS. ‐ Streets Chip Seal 2021 850,000 STR90 (FY21) 286 479 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & 767,460 REHABILITATION (CHIP SEAL) ‐ FY22 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ CHIP SEALS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO CHIP ‐ SEAL 15.6 MILES IN FY22. THIS INCLUDES CITY ‐ MAINTAINED PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: ‐ BRIDGER CREEK, LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK, ‐ TRADITIONS, FLANDERS CREEK, VALLEY WEST, NORTON ‐ EAST RANCH, J & D FAMILY, AND RESORT DR FROM ‐ HUFFINE TO BABCOCK, RAVALLI FROM FALLON TO ‐ FERGUSON, N COTTONWOOD FROM DURSTON TO OAK, FALLON ‐ FROM COTTONWOOD WEST TO CITY LIMITS, & WEST ‐ BABCOCK FROM COTTONWOOD WEST TO CITY LIMITS. THERE ‐ IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE LANE STRIPING ENHANCEMENTS ‐ WITH SOME PROJECTS, AND THEY WILL BE COORDINATED ‐ WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL ‐ PAVEMENT. ‐ Streets Chip Seal 2022 767,460 STR90 (FY22) 287 480 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE 205,000 & REHABILITATION (CHIP SEAL) ‐ FY23 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ CHIP SEALS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO CHIP ‐ SEAL 4.1 MILES IN FY23. THIS INCLUDES CITY ‐ MAINTAINED PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: ‐ LOYAL GARDEN SUBDIVISION & SOUTHBRIDGE ‐ SUBDIVISION. THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE LANE ‐ STRIPING ENHANCEMENTS WITH SOME PROJECTS, & THEY ‐ WILL BE COORDINATED WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY ‐ OF BOZEMAN ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL ‐ PAVEMENTS. ‐ REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ Streets Chip Seal 2023 205,000 STR90 (FY23) 288 481 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION 784,000 CHIP SEAL ‐ FY24 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ CHIP SEALS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO CHIP ‐ SEAL 11.2 MILES IN FY24. THIS INCLUDES CITY ‐ MAINTAINED PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: ‐ WEST WINDS, CROSSING 2, DURSTON MEADOWS, ROSE ‐ PARK, BRENTWOOD, STONERIDGE, AND ANNIE, AND OAK ‐ FROM 7TH TO ROUSE. THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE ‐ LANE STRIPING ENHANCEMENTS WITH SOME PROJECTS AND ‐ THEY WILL BE COORDINATED WITH ANY NECESSARY ‐ UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL ‐ PAVEMENT. ‐ Streets Chip Seal 2024 784,000 STR90 (FY24) 289 482 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION 420,000 CHIP SEAL ‐ FY25 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ CHIP SEALS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT TO OUR ‐ PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM. WE PLAN TO CHIP ‐ SEAL 6.75 MILES IN FY25. THIS INCLUDES CITY ‐ MAINTAINED PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: ‐ WESTRIDGE, THOMPSON ADDITION TO BOZEMAN NO 3, ‐ WESTFIELD, WESTFIELD SOUTH, WOODRIDGE, AND ALDER ‐ CREEK. THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR BIKE LANE STRIPING ‐ ENHANCEMENTS WITH SOME PROJECTS AND THEY WILL BE ‐ COORDINATED WITH ANY NECESSARY UTILITY ‐ REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASES THE LIFESPAN OF STREET WITHIN THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL ‐ PAVEMENT. ‐ Streets Chip Seal 2025 420,000 STR90 (FY25) 290 483 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OAK ST MEDIAN LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION FROM DAVIS 60,000 TO FERGUSON ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ‐ WHICH UTILIZE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE ‐ OVERALL WATER USE AND MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ‐ THESE MEDIANS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR HARSH ROADWAY ‐ CONDITIONS AND WILL REDUCE WATER USE, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION & MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ‐ LANDSCAPE. THESE LANDSCAPES ARE SUITED TO ‐ WITHSTAND DROUGHT EVENTS, REDUCING SOCIO‐ECONOMIC ‐ IMPACTS FROM THE LOSS OF OUTDOOR LANDSCAPES. ‐ THIS PROJECT PARTNERS THE CITY'S WATER ‐ CONSERVATION DIVISION AND STREET DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ 1)NO ACTION. MEDIANS REMAIN UNLANDSCAPED AND ‐ UNSIGHTLY, MOWING AND SPRAYING WEEDS CONTINUES. ‐ 2)TRADITIONAL TURFGRASS IS INSTALLED AND UNLIKE ‐ NATIVE OR LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS, ‐ REQUIRES FREQUENT MOWING, FERTILIZER, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION AND, ON AVERAGE, 80% MORE WATER ‐ THAN LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS. ‐ 3)CONCRETE, PAVING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS LANDSCAPING PROJECT INCLUDES:AESTHETIC ‐ BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY, A DEMONSTRATION OF ‐ DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPING, REDUCED OUTDOOR ‐ WATER USE COMPARED TO TURFGRASS MEDIANS, REDUCED ‐ MAINTENANCE, REDUCED CHEMICAL WEED MITIGATION, ‐ REDUCED SOCIO‐ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM A DROUGHT ‐ EVENT, AND DEMONSTRATES THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO ‐ WATER STEWARDSHIP. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS WOULD BE ADDED TO THE ‐ Oak St Median Landscaping & irrigation (Davis to Ferguson) 2021 60,000 STR92 (FY21) 291 484 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OAK ST MEDIAN LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION FROM DAVIS 60,000 TO FERGUSON ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ‐ WHICH UTILIZES BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE ‐ OVERALL WATER USE AND MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ‐ THESE MEDIANS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR HARSH ROADWAY ‐ CONDITIONS AND WILL REDUCE WATER USE, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION AND MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE LANDSCAPE. THESE LANDSCAPES ARE SUITED TO ‐ WITHSTAND DROUGHT EVENTS, REDUCING SOCIO‐ECONOMIC ‐ IMPACTS FROM THE LOSS OF OUTDOOR LANDSCAPES. ‐ THIS PROJECT PARTNERS THE CITY'S WATER ‐ CONSERVATION DIVISION AND STREET DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ 1)NO ACTION. MEDIANS REMAIN UNLANDSCAPED & ‐ UNSIGHTLY, MOWING & SPRAYING WEEDS CONTINUES. ‐ 2)TRADITIONAL TURFGRASS IS INSTALLED AND UNLIKE ‐ NATIVE OR LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS, ‐ REQUIRES FREQUENT MOWING, FERTILIZER, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION AND, ON AVERAGE, 80% MORE WATER ‐ THAN LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS. ‐ 3)CONCRETE, PAVING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS LANDSCAPING PROJECT INCLUDES: AESTHETIC ‐ BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY, A DEMONSTRATION OF ‐ DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPING, REDUCED OUTDOOR ‐ WATER USE COMPARED TO TURFGRASS MEDIANS, REDUCED ‐ MAINTENANCE, REDUCED CHEMICAL WEED MITIGATION, ‐ REDUCED SOCIO‐ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM A DROUGHT ‐ EVENT, AND DEMONSTRATES THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO ‐ WATER STEWARDSHIP. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS WILL BE ADDED TO THE ‐ Oak St Median Landscaping & irrigation (Davis to Ferguson) 2022 60,000 STR92 (FY22) 292 485 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OAK ST MEDIAN LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION FROM DAVIS 60,000 TO FERGUSON ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ‐ WHICH UTILIZE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE ‐ OVERALL WATER USE AND MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ‐ THESE MEDIANS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR HARSH ROADWAY ‐ CONDITIONS AND WILL REDUCE WATER USE, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION AND MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE LANDSCAPE. THESE LANDSCAPES ARE SUITED TO ‐ WITHSTAND DROUGHT EVENTS, REDUCING SOCIO‐ECONOMIC ‐ IMPACTS FROM THE LOSS OF OUTDOOR LANDSCAPES. ‐ THIS PROJECT PARTNERS THE CITY'S WATER ‐ CONSERVATION DIVISION & STREET DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ 1)NO ACTION. MEDIANS REMAIN UNLANDSCAPED AND ‐ UNSIGHTLY, MOWING & SPRAYING WEEDS CONTINUES. ‐ 2)TRADITIONAL TURFGRASS IS INSTALLED AND UNLIKE ‐ NATIVE OR LOW WATER SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS, ‐ REQUIRES FREQUENT MOWING, FERTILIZER, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION AND, ON AVERAGE, 80% MORE WATER ‐ THAN LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS. ‐ 3)CONCRETE, PAVING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS LANDSCAPING PROJECT INCLUDES:AESTHETIC ‐ BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY, A DEMONSTRATION OF ‐ DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPING, REDUCED OUTDOOR ‐ WATER USE COMPARED TO TURFGRASS MEDIANS, REDUCED ‐ MAINTENANCE, REDUCED CHEMICAL WEED MITIGATION, ‐ REDUCED SOCIO‐ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM A DROUGHT ‐ EVENT, AND DEMONSTRATES THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO ‐ WATER STEWARDSHIP. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE ‐ Oak St Median Landscaping & irrigation (Davis to Ferguson) 2023 60,000 STR92 (FY23) 293 486 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # OAK ST MEDIAN LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION FROM DAVIS 60,000 TO FERGUSON ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ‐ WHICH UTILIZE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE ‐ OVERALL WATER USE & MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ‐ THESE MEDIANS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR HARSH ROADWAY ‐ CONDITIONS AND WILL REDUCE WATER USE, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION & MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ‐ LANDSCAPE. THESE LANDSCAPES ARE SUITED TO WITH‐ ‐ STAND DROUGHT EVENTS, REDUCING SOCIO‐ECONOMIC ‐ IMPACTS FROM THE LOSS OF OUTDOOR LANDSCAPES. ‐ THIS PROJECT PARTNERS THE CITY'S WATER ‐ CONSERVATION DIVISION & STREET DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ 1)NO ACTION. MEDIANS REMAIN UNLANDSCAPED AND ‐ UNSIGHTLY, MOWING & SPRAYING WEEDS CONTINUES. ‐ 2)TRADITIONAL TURFGRASS IS INSTALLED AND UNLIKE ‐ NATIVE OR LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS, ‐ REQUIRES FREQUENT MOWING, FERTILIZER, CHEMICAL ‐ WEED MITIGATION AND, ON AVERAGE, 80% MORE WATER ‐ THAN LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS. ‐ 3)CONCRETE, PAVING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS LANDSCAPING PROJECT INCLUDES:AESTHETIC ‐ BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY, A DEMONSTRATION OF ‐ DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPING, REDUCED OUTDOOR ‐ WATER USE COMPARED TO TURFGRASS MEDIANS, REDUCED ‐ MAINTENANCE, REDUCED CHEMICAL WEED MITIGATION, ‐ REDUCED SOCIO‐ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM A DROUGHT ‐ EVENT, AND DEMONSTRATES THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO ‐ WATER STEWARDSHIP. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDED IN THE MEDIAN ‐ Oak St Median Landscaping & irrigation (Davis to Ferguson) 2024 60,000 STR92 (FY24) 294 487 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SNOW BLOWER 110,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACED LOADER MOUNTED SNOW BLOWER. OUR CURRENT ‐ SNOW BLOWER WILL BE 6 YEARS OLD AND IN NEED OF ‐ REPLACEMENT. DEPENDING ON THE WINTER, THESE ‐ MACHINES ARE VERY HIGH MAINTENANCE & IF A PARKING ‐ BLOCK TRIES TO GO THROUGH, THE MACHINE WILL BE ‐ DOWN FOR THE SEASON AND POSSIBLY FOREVER. IF OUR ‐ CURRENT BLOWER IS STILL OPERATIONAL, WE WOULD USE ‐ IT FOR A BACKUP. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ GO BACK TO USING A LOADER BUCKET. WITH A BLOWER ‐ WE CAN DO 30 BLOCKS A NIGHT VS 9 BLOCKS A NIGHT ‐ USING A LOADER BUCKET. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PARKING TO THE CURB IN THE DOWNTOWN. SCHOOL BUS ‐ DROP OFF AREAS ARE CLEANED SO THE KIDS DON'T SLIP ‐ UNDER THE BUS. CITY PARKING LOTS ARE CLEARED ‐ SOONER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NORMAL ONGOING MAINTENANCE. ‐ Snow Blower 2024 110,000 STR93 295 488 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # MASTIC PATCH MACHINE 70,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PURCHASE HOT APPLIED MASTIC MACHINE. THIS WOULD BE ‐ AN ADDITION TO OUR PATCHING OPERATIONS THAT WOULD ‐ GIVE US AN ASPHALT REPAIR THAT WOULDN'T REQUIRE ‐ COMPACTION AND CAN BE OPEN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY TO ‐ TRAFFIC. IT IS AN EXCELLENT LONG LASTING REPAIR TO ‐ PAVEMENT SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS THAT OTHERWISE ‐ WOULD NEED TO BE MILLED UP AND PATCHED. THE ‐ PRODUCT APPLIED IS SIMILAR TO WHAT IS PUT ON FLAT ‐ ROOFS BUT INCLUDE AGGREGATE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ EXPAND OUR LIST OF PAVEMENT REPAIRS REQUIRING ‐ MILL AND PATCH. ALLOW STREETS TO REACH FAILURE AT ‐ AN EARLIER RATE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REPAIR STREETS THAT MAY ONLY HAVE ONE BAD SPOT BUT ‐ WOULD NEED A FULL CLOSURE AND TEAR UP TO REPAIR ‐ USING NORMAL METHODS. SEAL GUTTER PANS TO KEEP ‐ MOISTURE OUT OF THE SUB BASE. SEAL VALLEY GUTTERS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MASTIC PRODUCT. EXPECT TO BUDGET IN OUR OPERATIONS ‐ ABOUT $20,000. ‐ Mastic Patch Machine 2024 70,000 STR94 296 489 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE #3223‐2004 CHEVY 35,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO REPLACE A 15 YEAR OLD TRUCK ‐ IN THE SIGN AND SIGNAL FLEET. IT IS A DAILY WORK ‐ TRUCK FOR THE CREW AND HAS OVER 168,000 MILES ON ‐ IT. EMISSION, SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND FUEL ‐ ECONOMY IMPROVEMENTS MADE OVER THE LAST 15 YEARS ‐ HELP JUSTIFY REPLACING THIS TRUCK. FLEET HISTORY ‐ SHOWS THAT AFTER 150,000 MILES OF IN TOWN DRIVING ‐ WE CAN LOOK FORWARD TO A TRANSMISSION OR ENGINE ‐ FAILURE THAT COST TO REPAIR WOULD EXCEED THE ‐ VALUE OF THE TRUCK. REPLACING THIS TRUCK BEFORE A ‐ MAJOR FAILURE MAKES SENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP DRIVING IT UNTIL IT DIES. ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ ECO FRIENDLINESS, SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND FUEL ‐ ECONOMY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE. WILL BE LESS TO MAINTAIN THAN THE CURRENT ‐ TRUCK. ‐ REPLACE #3223‐LIGHT DUTY 2021 35,000 STR98 297 490 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE #3250‐2004 FORD ONE TON 45,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO REPLACE A 15‐YEAR OLD, ONE ‐ TON TRUCK IN THE STREET FLEET. IT IS A DAILY WORK ‐ TRUCK FOR THE CREW AND IT IS LUCKY TO HAVE OVER ‐ 100,000 MILES ON IT. DUE TO POOR ENGINE DESIGN, IT ‐ IS IN THE SHOP OFTEN FOR TURBO REPLACEMENTS & ‐ BICYCLE ADVISORY BOARD (BABAB) WILL PROVIDE THE ‐ CITY WITH THEIR PRIORITY LIST. THE MONEY CAN BE ‐ COMBINED WITH STREET RESURFACING PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ SAFETY WILL LIKELY BE IMPROVED. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENTS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM WOULD PROVIDE FOR BIKE‐RELATED ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ‐ REPLACE #3250‐LIGHT DUTY 2021 45,000 STR99 298 491 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE #1438 ‐ 1992 FORD ONE TON 2WD 45,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO REPLACE A 30+ YEAR OLD TRUCK ‐ IN THE SIGN AND SIGNAL FLEET. IT IS THE BARRICADE ‐ TRUCK USED FOR STREET AND EVENT CLOSURES AND HAS ‐ ABOUT 100,000 MILES ON IT. EMISSION, SAFETY, ‐ RELIABILITY & FUEL ECONOMY IMPROVEMENTS MADE OVER ‐ THE LAST 30 YEARS HELP JUSTIFY REPLACING THIS ‐ TRUCK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP DRIVING IT UNTIL IT DIES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ECO FRIENDLINESS, SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND FUEL ‐ ECONOMY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ REPLACE #3484 ‐ 2009 CHEVY 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO REPLACE A TRUCK IN THE STREET ‐ FLEET. IT IS A DAILY WORK TRUCK FOR THE CREW & ‐ HAS OVER 113,000 MILES ON IT. EMISSION, SAFETY, ‐ RELIABILITY, AND FUEL ECONOMY IMPROVEMENTS MADE ‐ HELP JUSTIFY REPLACING THIS TRUCK. FLEET HISTORY ‐ SHOWS THAT AFTER 150,000 MILES OF IN TOWN ‐ DRIVING, WE CAN LOOK FORWARD TO A TRANSMISSION ‐ OR ENGINE FAILURE THAT COST TO REPAIR WOULD ‐ EXCEED THE VALUE OF THE TRUCK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP DRIVING UNTIL IT DIES. ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ ECO‐FRIENDLINESS, SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND FUEL ‐ ECONOMY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ REPLACE #1438‐LIGHT DUTY 2022 45,000 STR100 REPLACE #3484‐LIGHT DUTY 2022 STR101 40,000 299 492 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK WITH PLOW & SANDER 260,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO ADD A TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK ‐ TO OUR FLEET. AS WE ADD PLOW ROUTES AND EXISTING ‐ ROUTES GET LONGER AND WIDER, A TANDEM AXLE TRUCK ‐ GIVES US A 10 YARD CAPACITY VERSUS A 4 YARD ON A ‐ SINGLE AXLE. DURING PAVING OPERATIONS, A TANDEM ‐ AXLE CAN HAUL MORE ASPHALT WHICH SAVES TRIPS TO ‐ THE PLANT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CUT BACK ON OUR LEVEL OF SERVICE. ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ CONTINUE TO GET ARTERIALS AND COLLECTORS PLOWED ‐ EARLY IN THE MORNING. THIS TRUCK WOULD BE USED ON ‐ THE 3AM SHIFT ON A NEW ROUTE. THE ADDED SIGNALS & ‐ ROUNDABOUTS WOULD GET THE SAND THEY NEED TO KEEP ‐ THE VEHICLES MOVING. MORE EFFICIENT ASPHALT ‐ HAWK SIGNAL AT NEW BOZEMAN HIGH SCHOOL 110,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ INSTALLATION OF A HAWK PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL AT THE ‐ NEW HIGH SCHOOL TO INCREASE SAFETY AND IMPROVE ‐ TRAFFIC CAPACITY OF THE STREET. WHEN THE SPORTS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS & POWER FOR SIGNAL. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ PARK AND NEW HIGH SCHOOL ARE COMPLETE, THIS HAWK ‐ SIGNAL WILL BE REQUIRED. ‐ Hawk Signal at New BHS 2025 110,000 STR103 Tandem Axle Dump Truck with Plows & Sanders 2022 STR102 260,000 300 493 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BRIDGER CREEK STABILIZATION AT BOYLAN ROAD IN 50,000 LEGENDS II AT BRIDGER CREEK SUBDIVISION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ STABILIZE BRIDGER CREEK AT BOYLAN ROAD IN LEGENDS ‐ II SUBDIVISION. THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO AN AVULSION ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING AND RISK DAMAGE TO THE ROAD. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ AT BRIDGER CREEK, WHICH REROUTED STREAM FLOWS NEAR ‐ BOYLAN ROAD. ‐ PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPDATE PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT FROM 2013. WE ‐ DON'T HAVE STAFF CAPACITY TO PERFORM THIS ‐ ASSESSMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE USING PREVIOUS PAVEMENT CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENT ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ AN UPDATED ASSESSMENT WILL ALLOW US TO PRIORITIZE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SO OUR MAINTENANCE FUNDS ‐ CAN BE USED ON STREETS THAT CAN STILL BENEFIT FROM ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ Pavement Condition Assessment 2021 200,000 STR105 Bridger Creek Stabilization UNSCHEDULED 50,000 STR104 301 494 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ASPHALT ROLLER 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WOULD BE AN ADDITION TO OUR ASPHALT FLEET. ‐ CURRENTLY WE HAVE A 4 TON ROLLER THAT TAKES MANY ‐ PASSES TO GET COMPACTION. WITH A LARGER ROLLER WE ‐ WOULD GET A BETTER FINISHED PRODUCT IN LESS TIME. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH MANY PASSES BEFORE THE ASPHALT COOLS ‐ DOWN. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ A BETTER FINISHED PRODUCT IN LESS TIME WHICH WILL ‐ LEAD TO A LONGER STREET LIFE. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NORMAL REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE. ‐ PAVEMENT MARKING STRIPER 37,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM IS USED TO PAINT CURBS, CROSSWALKS AND ‐ ANY PAVEMENT MARKINGS. THIS MACHINE CAN CARRY ‐ TWO COLORS AND REFLECTIVE BEADS. WE CURRENTLY HAVE ‐ A MACHINE SET UP FOR YELLOW AND ONE FOR WHITE. ‐ BEADS ARE SPREAD ONTO THE WET PAINT MANUALLY. ‐ WITH THIS MACHINE WE CAN SWITCH COLORS IN THE ‐ FIELD AND NOT NEED AN ADDITIONAL WORKER TO ‐ SPRINKLE BEADS. IF NEEDED THIS COULD PAINT LANE ‐ LINES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP USING THE SINGLE COLOR MACHINES AND AN ‐ ADDITIONAL WORKER TO SPRINKLE BEADS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CARRY TWO COLORS AND PUT THE BEADS DOWN WITH THE ‐ PAINT. ABILITY TO PAINT LONG LINES IF NEEDED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NORMAL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS. ‐ Asphalt Roller 2025 100,000 STR106 Pavement Marking Striper 2025 37,000 STR107 302 495 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TOOLCAT UTILITY VEHICLE 65,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL BE AN ADDITION TO OUR FLEET FOR SIDEWALK ‐ PLOWING AND STREET MAINTENANCE. ROUND ABOUTS ‐ TAKE ABOUT 4 HOURS TO CLEAR AND WITH ADDITIONAL ‐ SIDEWALKS ON ARTERIALS AND COLLECTORS WE NEED ‐ ANOTHER PIECE OF EQUIPMENT. CURRENTLY WE WAIT ‐ UNTIL OTHER EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE OFTEN IT IS THE ‐ NEXT DAY UNTIL SIDEWALKS ARE CLEARED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED; ‐ LOWER OUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ON SIDEWALKS AND ‐ CROSSINGS. CONTRACT OUT EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE ‐ NO STAFF TO FOLLOW UP ON THE CONTRACTORS ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ FOLLOWING OUR ORDINANCE OF SIDEWALKS BEING CLEARED ‐ WITHIN THE FIRST 24 HOURS IS IMPORTANT TO THE ‐ PUBLIC THAT USE OUR SIDEWALKS FOR TRANSPORTATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ GETTING THE SIDEWALKS CLEARED IN A TIMELY MANNER ‐ AND USING SMALLER MORE FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLES FOR ‐ SHORT TRIPS FOR OPERATIONS. ‐ PORTABLE EMULSION TANK 38,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CURRENTLY WE ORDER 260 GALLON TOTES OF EMULSION ‐ OIL WITH THE HOPE IT IS FRESH AND HAS BEEN STIRRED ‐ BEFORE IT WAS SHIPPED. THE TOTES THEN SIT WAITING ‐ THE TANK UPON DELIVERY, HEAT IT AND CIRCULATE IT ‐ TO KEEP IT IN SUSPENSION. WE WILL ALWAYS HAVE OIL ‐ WITH THIS TANK WE WILL BE ABLE TO TRANSFER IT TO ‐ READY TO USE. ‐ FOR USE. THEY THEN NEED TO BE STIRRED AND HEATED ‐ BEFORE THEY ARE PUT IN THE PATCH TRUCK. ‐ Toolcat Utility Vehicle 2025 65,000 STR109 Portable Emulsion Tanl 2025 38,000 STR110 303 496 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PAINT TRUCK 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PAINT TRUCK FOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS ‐ CURRENTLY WE DEPEND ON THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ‐ TRANSPORTATION TO PAINT OUR STREETS. WE HAVE TO BE ‐ FIT INTO THEIR SCHEDULE AND IF IT OCCURS LATER IN ‐ THE SUMMER WHEN NIGHT TEMPS DON'T SUPPORT QUICK ‐ DRYING OF THE PAINT, IT HAS TO BE DONE IN THE ‐ DAYTIME AND WE HAVE TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED; ‐ CONTINUE TO DEPEND ON MDT OR CONTRACT OUT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ WE CAN PAINT ON OUR SCHEDULE AND PAINT MORE THAN ‐ ONCE A YEAR IF NEEDED. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE TRUCK WILL HAVE TO BE IN HEATED STORAGE AND ‐ NORMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ SPRAY PATCH TRUCK REPLACING SPRAY PATCH TRAILER 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO REPLACE OUR 10 YEAR OLD ‐ TRAILER MOUNTED SPRAY PATCH UNIT WITH A TRUCK ‐ MOUNTED UNIT. ONLY ONE OPERATOR IS NEEDED FOR A ‐ TRUCK MOUNTED PATCHER VS. TWO FOR A TRAILER ‐ MOUNTED PATCHER. THE TRAILER MOUNTED UNIT WILL ‐ HAVE OVER 3000 HOURS ON IT AT TIME OF REPLACEMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ USE THE TRAILER MOUNTER UNIT UNTIL IT DIES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ONLY NEED ONE OPERATOR. SAFER IN TRAFFIC. LESS ‐ NEED FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL. KEEP OUR STREETS IN ‐ BETTER CONDITION AND NOT LET THEM FALL IN ‐ DISREPAIR. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NORMAL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS. LESS THAN OLD UNIT ‐ Paint Truck UNSCHEDULED 250,000 STR111 Spray Patch Truck 2025 250,000 STR112 304 497 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 975 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 975 GF346 305 498 Vehicle Maintenance 306 499 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 87 $ 87 Plus: Internal Allocation/Billing Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 45,087 $ ‐ $ 4,312 $ ‐ Less: Scheduled CIP Costs $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (45,000) $ ‐ $ (4,350) $ ‐ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 87 $ 87 $ 49 Assumptions are made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Vehicle Mtc Billings $ 1,354,000 $ 1,367,540 $ 1,381,215 $ 1,395,028 $ 1,408,978 $ 1,423,068 Estimated Annual increase 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,354,000 $ 1,381,215 $ 1,395,028 $ 1,408,978 $ 1,423,068 $ 1,437,298 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 0.0% 0.3% Plus: Increase (Decrease) Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 0.0% 0.3% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 45,087 $ ‐ $ 4,312 Note: The Vehicle Maintenance Fund is an internal service fund that operates entirely from cost recovery paid by City Departments. Capital items are funded as needed, without the accumulation of any reserve for capital. Projected Projected CURRENT $‐ $‐ $(45,000) $‐ $(4,350) $‐ FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 307 500 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled VM04 FORKLIFT REPLACE ‐ ‐ 45,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ GF346 FACILTIY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,350 ‐ Department Subtotal ‐ ‐ 45,000 ‐ 4,350 ‐ 308 501 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The Vehicle Maintenance Fund supports the capital purchases and operations of our Vehicle Maintenance Shop. The division operates in our new facility on North Rouse and has a small number of building and equipment needs. Because it is an Internal Service Fund, paid for through cost‐recovery from other divisions, capital reserve balances aren’t being accumulated. When capital is needed, the annual cost‐recovery allocations increase to cover the costs. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY A replacement of a forklift is scheduled for FY23. 309 502 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE FORKLIFT 45,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS IS A REQUEST TO REPLACE OUR 1997 FORKLIFT AT ‐ VEHICLE MAINTENANCE. IT IS USED DAILY TO UNLOAD ‐ PARTS, MOVE WASTE OIL CONTAINERS AND REMOVE ‐ CYLINDERS FROM THE TOP OF GARBAGE TRUCKS. IT IS 25 ‐ YEARS OLD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ KEEP USING IT IF IT STARTS AND RUNS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ A SAFER AND MORE RELIABLE PIECE OF EQUIPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NORMAL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS. LESS THAN THE ‐ CURRENT FORKLIFT. ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 4,350 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 4,350 GF346 FORKLIFT REPLACE 2023 45,000 VM04 310 503 Wastewater 311 504 WASTEWATER FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 4,191,113 $ 1,963,599 $ 2,183,357 $ 3,384,759 $ 3,987,285 $ 5,283,036 $ ‐ Plus: Wastewater Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 2,480,349 $ 2,554,759 $ 2,631,402 $ 2,710,344 $ 2,791,654 $ 2,875,404 $ ‐ Plus: SID Riverside Annexation (Estimated) $ 4,000,000 Less: FY19 Carryover Capital $ (3,080,363) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (1,627,500) $ (2,335,000) $ (5,430,000) $ (2,107,818) $ (1,495,903) $ (3,175,594) $ (155,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 1,963,599 $ 2,183,357 $ 3,384,759 $ 3,987,285 $ 5,283,036 $ 4,982,846 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Wastewater Revenues $ 9,921,394 $ 9,921,394 $ 10,219,036 $ 10,525,607 $ 10,841,375 $ 11,166,616 Estimated Annual Increase 0.0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Total Estimated Revenues $ 9,921,394 $ 10,219,036 $ 10,525,607 $ 10,841,375 $ 11,166,616 $ 11,501,615 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 2,480,349 $ 2,554,759 $ 2,631,402 $ 2,710,344 $ 2,791,654 $ 2,875,404 Projected Projected CURRENT $(2,335,000) $(5,430,000) $(2,107,818) $(1,495,903) $(3,175,594) $(155,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED WASTEWATER FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 312 505 WASTEWATER FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled WW07 ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐ DESIGN 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 ‐ WW08 WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 ‐ WW69 SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 ‐ WW70 WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 ‐ WW71 WRF FACILITY PLAN UPDATE 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW76 THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN 500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW83 UFAT GRAVITY THICKENER DR ‐ ‐ 400,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW92 DEWATER PUMPS REPLACEMENT ‐ 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW96 E GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION 70,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW97 DIGESTER #4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,300,000 ‐ WW100 REPLACE BACKHOE 2683 ‐ ‐ 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW101 REPLACE SEWER JETTER ‐ ‐ 327,818 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW102 SEWER BYPASS PUMP ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW103 REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3415 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 140,254 ‐ WW104 REPLACE SEWER TV VAN ‐ ‐ ‐ 290,903 ‐ ‐ WW105 REPLACE VACTOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 527,115 ‐ WW106 FIBER CONDUIT: DAVIS>WRF 69,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW107 FIBER CONDUIT: I‐90 XING 36,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WWIF47 WW COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WWIF49 WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ UNKNOWN WWIF50 JOINT MSU/DEQ PILOT 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WWW1 WHEELED EXCAVATOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 155,000 W106 SCADA PLAN UPDATE ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ RSSID RIVERSIDE ANNEXATION INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ 4,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF346 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,225 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,335,000 5,430,000 2,107,818 1,495,903 3,175,594 155,000 313 506 WASTEWATER FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This enterprise fund revenue source are rate fees charged to users. We estimate wastewater rates dedicated to capital will need to increase by at least 3% bringing the portion of Wastewater Utility revenues that support capital of 25% in order to fund this capital plan. A full rate‐study and analysis is currently underway. $7,990,070 $8,398,899 $9,646,160 $8,566,893 $8,876,017 $9,921,394 $9,081,873 $‐ $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 5 yr avg FY15‐19 Wastewater Fund Revenue 314 507 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The plan has several recurring items, such as WW08 Wastewater Pipe Replacements, WW69 Small works projects, and WW70 WRF Facility Engine Optimization; have been scheduled based on current needs for approximately $1 million a year. Wastewater Operations has replacement vehicles and equipment throughout the plan to the plan. Some larger equipment added this year are scheduled in FY23‐FY25 including replacing a back hoe (WW100), a Sewer Jetter (WW101), Replacing a sewer van (WW104) and replacing Vactor (WW105). At the Water Reclamation Facility in FY21 WW71 WRF Facility Plan Update will compare past predictions of the loadings on the City’s WRF with current loadings to aid in new projections for future planning. WW83 UFAT Gravity Thickener DR is a replacement of a deteriorated gravity thickener, which is crucial part of the solids treatment process that operate continuously. New to the plan in the fifth year (FY25) is WW97 Digester #4 which would construct a new digester would add redundancy to the facility. 315 508 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS ‐ ATTRIBUTABLE TO AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. ANNUAL ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS ‐ WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ PROJECTS WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 2021 WW07 (FY21) $ 25,000 ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 2022 $ 25,000 WW07 (FY22) 316 509 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL WATEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY OTHER YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE ‐ REPLACEMENT PROJECTS MINIMIZE SERVICE ‐ INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ANNUAL WASTEWATER ‐ PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS WOULD BE DELAYED ‐ IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PGORAM PROJECTS ‐ WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 2024 $ 25,000 WW07 (FY24) ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 2023 $ 25,000 WW07 (FY23) 317 510 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PGORAM PROJECTS ‐ WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 IN 2021 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN, BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2021. ‐ WORK WOULD COINCIDE WITH THE ANNUAL STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULED FOR FY21. THE ‐ REMAINING BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER ‐ REPLACEMENTS ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING ‐ REPAIRS. THE CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ‐ ANALYZED NIGHTLY TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM ‐ THE WASTEWATER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 2025 $ 25,000 WW07 (FY25) WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 2021 $ 1,000,000 WW08 (FY21) 318 511 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 IN 2022 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN, BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2022. ‐ WORK WOULD COINCIDE WITH THE ANNUAL STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED FOR FY22. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER ‐ REPLACEMENTS ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING ‐ REPAIRS. THE CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ‐ ANALYZED NIGHTLY TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM ‐ THE WASTEWATER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 2022 $ 1,000,000 WW08 (FY22) 319 512 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 IN 2023 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN, BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2023. ‐ WORK WOULD COINCIDE WITH THE ANNUAL STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED FOR FY23. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER ‐ REPLACEMENTS ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING ‐ REPAIRS. THE CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ‐ ANALYZED NIGHTLY TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM ‐ THE WASTEWATER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 2023 $ 1,000,000 WW08 (FY23) 320 513 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN,BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2024.PRIORITY ‐ WILL BE PLACED ON SEWER REPLACEMENT IN THE SECTION ‐ OF STREET TO BE REPLACED THIS FISCAL YEAR IN THE ‐ STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER REPLACEMENT ‐ ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING REPAIRS. THE ‐ CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ANALZYED NIGHTLY ‐ TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM THE WASTEWATER ‐ OPERATIONS DIVISION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 2024 $ 1,000,000 WW08 (FY24) 321 514 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN,BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2024.PRIORITY ‐ WILL BE PLACED ON SEWER REPLACEMENT IN THE SECTION ‐ OF STREET TO BE REPLACED THIS FISCAL YEAR IN THE ‐ STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER REPLACEMENT ‐ ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING REPAIRS. THE ‐ CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ANALZYED NIGHTLY ‐ TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM THE WASTEWATER ‐ OPERATIONS DIVISION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 2025 $ 1,000,000 WW08 (FY25) 322 515 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE ‐ REMEDIED QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF ‐ FACILITY EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST ‐ GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES RUN 24/7 AND HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS ‐ BUT WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO ‐ BACKUP SYSTEM AND REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE ‐ IMMEDIATELY. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT ‐ FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS A ‐ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2021 $ 120,000 WW69 (FY21) 323 516 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACLITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILITY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES RUN 24/7 & HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS BUT ‐ WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO BACKUP ‐ SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. NOT ‐ ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED ‐ & BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2022 $ 120,000 WW69 (FY22) 324 517 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILTY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES ARE 24/7 & HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS BUT ‐ WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO BACKUP ‐ SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. NOT ‐ ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED ‐ & BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2023 $ 120,000 WW69 (FY23) 325 518 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILITY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES ARE 24/7 AND HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS ‐ BUT WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO ‐ BACKUP SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE ‐ IMMEDIATELY. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED OR BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2024 $ 120,000 WW69 (FY24) 326 519 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILITY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES ARE 24/7 AND HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS ‐ BUT WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO ‐ BACKUP SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE ‐ IMMEDIATELY. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED OR BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2025 $ 120,000 WW69 (FY25) 327 520 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS ‐ STARTED WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT ‐ IS PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUIDES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2021 $ 60,000 WW70 (FY21) 328 521 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2022 $ 60,000 WW70 (FY22) 329 522 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2023 $ 60,000 WW70 (FY23) 330 523 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2024 $ 60,000 WW70 (FY24) 331 524 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ WRF FACILITY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MASTER PLAN UPDATE WILL COMPARE PAST ‐ PREDICTIONS OF THE LOADINGS ON THE CITY'S WRF ‐ WITH CURRENT LOADINGS. NEW PROJECTIONS WILL BE ‐ MADE USING THESE DATA TRENDS TO DETERMINE THE BEST ‐ COURSE OF ACTION & SEQUENCING OF PROJECTS TO MEET ‐ THE NEEDS OF THE FACILITY TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE ‐ GROWTH. ‐ WRF FACILITY PLAN UPDATE 2021 $ 300,000 WW71 WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2025 $ 60,000 WW70 (FY24) 332 525 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PURCHASE A THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN & THE ‐ ENGINEERING TO PROPERLY INSTALL IT. THE TWO ‐ INSTALLED PRETREATMENT SCREENS ARE RUNNING 24/7 SO ‐ THERE IS NO REDUNDANCY TO THE SYSTEM. ADDING A ‐ THIRD SCREEN WILL INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF ‐ PRETREATMENT TO HANDLE INCREASED FLOWS FROM GROWTH ‐ WITHOUT BYPASSING THE SCREENS. THIS SCREEN WILL ‐ PREVENT THE CLOGGING OF PIPES & PUMPS & WILL ‐ PRESERVE THE EFFLUENT QUALITY OF THE FACILITY, & ‐ ALL EQUIPMENT DOWNSTREAM OF THE SCREENS WILL BE ‐ BETTER PROTECTED. PIPES & PUMPS THAT ARE NOT ‐ PLUGGED RUN MORE EFFICIENTLY & REQUIRE LESS ENERGY ‐ TO RUN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING & RUN THE RISK OF HAVING TO BYPASS THE ‐ EXISTING SCREENS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT HANDLE THE ‐ LOAD COMING INTO THE PLANT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROTECTING DOWNSTREAM INFRASTRUCTURE BY NOT ‐ HAVING TO BYPASS THE SCREENS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ADDITIONAL COST OF ELECTRICITY FOR THE MOTORS ON ‐ THE SCREEN. ‐ UFAT GRAVITY THICKENER DR 400,000 DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF DETERIORATED GRAVITY THICKENER ‐ MECHANISM. THIS THICKENING EQUIPMENT IS A CRUCIAL ‐ PART OF THE SOLIDS TREATMENT PROCESS AN MUST ‐ OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE, THIS IS A NECESSARY SPECIALIZED PROCESS. ‐ ADDITIONAL COST: ‐ NONE ‐ THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN 2021 $ 500,000 WW76 UFAT GRAVITY THICKENER DR 2023 $ 400,000 WW83 333 526 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DESCRIPTION: 150,000 THIS PROJECT WOULD PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF ‐ THREE CRITICAL PUMPS THAT ARE NEARING THE END OF ‐ THEIR RELIABLE LIFE. THERE ARE TWO ‐ 20HP PUMPS ‐ AS WELL AS ONE‐ 5 HP. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ THESE PUMPS HAVE NO REDUNDANCY. DUE TO THEIR AGE ‐ REPLACEMENT PARTS CAN NOT BE LOCATED. ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ ASSURANCE OF RELIABLE OPERATION OF PUMPS WHEN ‐ NECESSARY MAINTENENCE IS PERFORMED. ‐ OPERATING COST: ‐ INSTALLATION OF THESE NEW PUMPS SHOULD LOWER ‐ THE COST OF OPERATION BECAUSE OF HIGHER EFFICIENCY ‐ E GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION RESTORATION LOMR 70,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO COMPLETE ‐ A LETTER OF MAP REVISION APPLICATION TO FEMA FOR ‐ THE EAST GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION. ‐ DIGESTER #4 1,300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF 4TH ANAEROBIC DIGESTER ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. THIS HAS BEEN OUR CURRENT STRATEGY. ‐ HOWEVER, WITHOUT THIS ADDITIONAL REDUNDANCY WE ‐ RUN THE RISK OF HAVING A SOLIDS HANDLING DILEMA IF ‐ DIGESTOR #3 IS EVER OUT OF SERVICE. THERE IS NO ‐ BYPASS OR WORK AROUND ON THIS CRITICAL PROCESS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST: ‐ THIS IS A NEW PROJECT CREATED IN FY20 ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: UNKNOWN ‐ DIGERSTER #4 2025 $ 1,300,000 WW97 EAST GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION RESTORATION 2021 $ 70,000 WW96 DEWATER PUMPS REPLACEMENT 2022 $ 150,000 WW92 334 527 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE BACKHOE 2683 125,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2000 JOHN DEERE BACKHOE WITH 3071 HOURS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ LEASE OR RENT ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ REPLACE SEWER JETTER 3031 327,818 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2003 SEWER JETTER WITH 52679 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ SEWER BYPASS PUMP 50,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ 6" BYPASS PUMP TO BACKUP EXISTING PUMP AND TO ‐ ALLOW INCREASED PUMPING OF DAVIS LN LIFT STATION ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE ‐ REPLACE SEWER JETTER 2023 $ 327,818 WW101 SEWER BYPASS PUMP 2023 $ 50,000 WW102 REPLACE BACKHOE 2683 2023 $ 125,000 WW100 335 528 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3415 140,254 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 DUMP TRUCK WITH 30311 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE REPLACE SEWER TV VAN 3406 290,903 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 TV VAN WITH 31244 MILES ‐ THIS UNIT HAS BEEN REFURBISHED ONCE ALREADY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ NONE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE REPLACE VACTOR 527,115 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2015 VACTOR ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE ‐ DAVIS LIFT STATION TO WRF FIBER CONDUIT 69,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EXTEND FIBER CONDUIT FROM THE DAVIS LIFT STATION ‐ TO THE WRF. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ REPLACE SEWER TV VAN 2024 $ 290,903 WW104 REPLACE VACTOR 2025 $ 527,115 WW105 FIBER CONDUIT: DAVIS > WRF 2021 $ 69,000 WW106 REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3415 2025 $ 140,254 WW103 336 529 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FIBER CONDUIT I‐90 CROSSING 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EXTEND FIBER CONDUIT ACROSS I‐90 ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ WASTEWATER COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 125,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ GIVEN RAPID GROWTH AND THE DESIRE FOR INCREASED ‐ INFILL DENSITIES UPDATE THE WASTEWATER COLLECTION ‐ FACILITIES PLAN. THE HYDRAULIC MODEL UPDATE IN ‐ FY20 WILL BE A PREREQUISITE EFFORT FOR THIS UPDATE ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED ‐ IN THE PREVIOUS PLAN. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT UPGRADES UNKNOWN DESCRIPTION: ‐ DUE TO GROWTH ON OUR SYSTEM, WE WILL NEED TO ‐ EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF THE WRF. ‐ THE MONTANA DEQ DISCHARGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ‐ ARE BECOMING SIGNIFICANTLY MORE STRINGENT. THIS ‐ UPGRADE WILL INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES FOR MORE ‐ STRINGENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ‐ FUNDING: $10M WWIF 630 AND $50M WW620 ‐ JOINT MSU/DEQ WETLAND PILOT STUDY AT WRF 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ GRANT MATCH TO PERFORM DESIGN WORK FOR A PILOT ‐ OF A MODERN TREATMENT WETLAND TECHNOLOGY TO ‐ BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE WRF BY MSU. THIS MAY RESULT ‐ IN FUTURE CAPITAL SAVINGS WHEN WE UPGRADE THE ‐ WRF. ‐ JOINT MSU/DEQ WETLAND PILOT STUDY AT WRF 2021 $ 30,000 WWIF50 FIBER CONDUIT: I‐90 XING 2021 $ 36,000 WW107 WASTEWATER COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 2021 $ 125,000 WWIF47 WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT UPGRADES NSCHEDULE UNKNOWN WWIF49 337 530 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WHEELED EXCAVATOR 155,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EXCAVATOR WILL ALLOW US TO DIG DOWN TO 20FT ‐ CURRENTLY WE ARE LIMITED TO 12FT /SPLIT WITH WWOPS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ SCADA MASTER PLAN 75,000 EVALUATE OPTIONS AND DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS ‐ FOR AREA‐WIDE NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION FOR PLANNED ‐ REMOTE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE. DEVELOP SCADA DESIGN, ‐ EQUIPMENT, AND SCADA TAGGING AND PROGRAMMING ‐ STANDARDS. FORMULATE DATA ACCESSIBILITY AND SCADA ‐ INTEGRATION WITH OTHER CITY APPLICATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION OF LIMITED SCADA WITHIN ‐ DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND PLANT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ MOVED FROM FY18. ‐ RIVERSIDE ANNEXATION INFRASTRUCTURE 4,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RIVERSIDE IS LOOKING TO ANNEX AND CONNET TO ‐ CITY WASTEWATER. THE NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE TO ‐ CONNECT WILL BE FUNDED THROUGH AN SID ‐ WHEELED EXCAVATOR NSCHEDULE $ 155,000 WWW1 SCADA MASTER PLAN 2022 $ 75,000 W106 RIVERSIDE ANNEXATION INFRASTRUCTURE 2022 $ 4,000,000 RSSID 338 531 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 3,225 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 $ 3,225 GF346 339 532 Wastewater Impact Fee 340 533 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 3,590,778 $ 2,389,548 $ 2,812,077 $ 2,809,273 $ 3,091,771 $ 688,406 $ ‐ Plus: Impact Fee Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,109,180 $ 1,142,455 $ 1,176,729 $ 1,212,031 $ 1,248,392 $ 1,285,844 $ ‐ Plus: Financing WWIF38 $ 5,200,000 Plus: Financing WWIF20 $ 2,800,000 Plus: Financing WWIF21 $ 1,250,000 Plus: Funding from FY19 Carry forward financing $ 7,985,000 Less: Carryover FY19 Capital Projects $ (8,623,947) Less: Debt payments (WWIF11, 24,38,20,22) $ (97,463) $ (194,926) $ (879,533) $ (879,533) $ (1,151,757) $ (1,151,757) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (6,774,000) $ (525,000) $ (300,000) $ (4,100,000) $ (2,500,000) $ ‐ $ (20,245,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 2,389,548 $ 2,812,077 $ 2,809,273 $ 3,091,771 $ 688,406 $ 822,493 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Wastewater Impact Fee Revenues $ 1,109,180 $ 1,109,180 $ 1,142,455 $ 1,176,729 $ 1,212,031 $ 1,248,392 Estimated Annual Increase 0.0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,109,180 $ 1,142,455 $ 1,176,729 $ 1,212,031 $ 1,248,392 $ 1,285,844 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Wastewater Capacity Expansion CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,109,180 $ 1,142,455 $ 1,176,729 $ 1,212,031 $ 1,248,392 $ 1,285,844 Projected Projected CURRENT $(525,000) $(300,000) $(4,100,000) $(2,500,000) $‐ $(20,245,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE PROJECTS 341 534 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled WWIF20 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD INTERCEPTOR ‐ ‐ 2,800,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WWIF22 DAVIS‐FOWLER INTERCEPTOR ‐ ‐ 1,250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WWIF35 BABCOCK SANITARY SEWER UPGRADE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 245,000 WWIF44 WRF INTERCEPTOR ‐ ‐ 50,000 500,000 ‐ WWIF45 BIOTRAIN #1 RETRO FIT ‐ 300,000 ‐ 2,000,000 ‐ ‐ WWIF46 DOWNTOWN SEWER MAIN UPGRADES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,000,000 WWIF47 WASTEWATER COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WWIF48 HIDDEN VALLEY LIFT STATION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,000,000 WWIF49 WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT UPGRADES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10,000,000 WWIF51 COTTONWOOD SUB SEWER OVERSIZING 400,000 Fiscal Year totals 525,000 300,000 4,100,000 2,500,000 ‐ 20,245,000 342 535 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This enterprise fund revenue source is impact fees. Revenue estimates for Water Impact Fees have been updated with the 5‐year average collection amount, detailed on the following page. Revenues have grown on average by 4.62% per year, over the past 5 years. For the CIP, we have used the 5‐ year Average collection, plus 3% growth each year from FY21 to FY25. $1,052,000.00 $1,232,889.00 $1,121,780.00 $1,810,489.00 $1,109,180.00 $1,265,267.60 $‐ $200,000.00 $400,000.00 $600,000.00 $800,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $1,800,000.00 $2,000,000.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Average FY15‐19 Wastewater Impact Fee Revenues 343 536 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The next major project for the plan is WWIF 20 the North Frontage Road interceptor scheduled in FY23, which will replace the road’s interceptor between Springhill RD and Bridger Dr. Portions of the current interceptor are at or very near capacity. This project will directly increase collection capacity in the southeast and east part of town. The same year we start work on WWIF44 the Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) Interceptor with construction done in FY24 and will expand capacity upgrading from a thirty‐inch outfall to a 48‐inch main. Scheduled in FY24 is WWIF45 Biotrain #1 Retro Fit that will increase nutrient (total nitrogen and total phosphorous) removal treatment capacity of the WRF. The retrofit will modify the reactor basin into a 5‐stage bardenpho reactor similar to existing Biotrains 2 & 3. The retrofit helps the WRF maintain its current nutrient effluent performance as the city continues to grow. In other words, as our wastewater load increases with growth, we need additional bioreactor capacity to maintain current nutrient effluent performance. A significant amount of borrowing has been incurred for Projects WWIF24, WWIF11, WWIF20, WWIF22 and WWIF38. Due to the uncertainty of the revenue stream, the Wastewater Utility will need to borrow via revenue bonds and be reimbursed by the Water Impact Fee Fund. There may be rate‐ requirements to support this borrowing, which were included in the most recent Wastewater Rate Study. The estimated borrowing it outlined in the table below: The projects highlighted above aid in our efforts towards the Strategic Plan 4.3 b Increase Capacity of Sewer Pipes to Accommodate Development Projects. Debt‐ Description FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Davis Lane Lift Station Debt Service (WWIF24) 194,926 389,851 389,851 389,851 389,851 Front Street Interceptor Debt Service (WWIF11) ‐ 140,161 140,161 140,161 140,161 Norton East Rach Outfall Diversion (WWIF38) ‐ 349,521 349,521 349,521 349,521 N. Frontage Street Interceptor Debt Service ‐ ‐ ‐ 188,204 188,204 Davis‐Fowler Interceptor (WWIF22) ‐ ‐ ‐ 84,020 84,020 Total Estimated Debt Service Payment $ 194,926 $ 879,533 $ 879,533 $ 1,151,757 $ 1,151,757 Estimated Debt Schedule 344 537 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # N FRONTAGE RD INTERCEPTOR 5,290,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL REPLACE OR PARALLEL 11,500' OF ‐ THE NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD INTERCEPTOR BETWEEN ‐ SPRINGHILL RD AND BRIDGER DR. PORTIONS OF THE ‐ INTERCEPTOR ARE AT OR VERY NEAR CAPACITY AND UNLES ‐ IMPROVEMENTS ARE MADE IT WILL BE AT OR OVER ‐ CAPACITY WHEN THE TRIBUTARY OBLIGATED AREAS ARE ‐ DEVELOPED. THIS PROJECT WILL DIRECTLY INCREASE ‐ COLLECTION CAPACITY IN THE SOUTHEAST AND EAST PART ‐ OF TOWN WITHIN THE COMMUNITY PLAN BOUNDARY AS ‐ WELL AS THE EAST PART OF TOWN WILL BE TRIBUTARY TO ‐ THIS NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD INTERCEPTOR. THERE ARE ‐ POTENTIALLY A GREAT NUMBER OF PRIVATE ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WHICH WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ‐ PROCEED DUE TO THE LACK OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION ‐ CAPACITY. THIS PROJECT WILL CONFORM TO THE CITY'S ‐ WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LIMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF CONSTRUCTED TO THE LINE SIZES MASTER PLANNED ‐ IN THE CITY S WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN, ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE PROVIDED FOR FUTURE GROWTH ‐ TRIBUTARY TO THIS MAIN. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ IMPACT FEES CAN NOT FUND OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE ‐ COSTS. THE CITY S WASTEWATER UTILITY WILL PAY FOR ‐ HESE COSTS, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE A SMALL ‐ INCREMENT OF THE CITY S SYSTEM AS A WHOLE. ‐ DECREASE: (2,490,000) CHANGING THIS PROJECT TO BE DONE IN PHASES AS IT ‐ IS PROPOSED IN THE MASTER PLAN ‐ NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD INTERCEPTOR 2023 2,800,000 WWIF20 345 538 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # DAVIS‐FOWLER INTERCEPTOR ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL REPLACE OR PARALLEL 2700' OF THE ‐ DAVIS‐FOWLER INTERCEPTOR BETWEEN DURSTON AND ‐ OAK. THE INTERCEPTOR BETWEEN DURSTON RD AND W ‐ OAK WILL EVENTUALLY EXCEED CAPACITY AS THE BAXTER ‐ CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN DEVELOPS. IN ORDER TO CONVEY ‐ THE ULTIMATE BUILD‐OUT FLOW, THE INTERCEPTOR WILL ‐ NEED TO BE INCREASED FROM AN 18‐INCH DIAMETER TO ‐ A 24‐INCH DIAMETER PIPE. ‐ ALTERNAITVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LIMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF CONSTRUCTED TO THE LINE SIZES MASTER PLANNED ‐ IN THE CITY S WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN, ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ANTICIPATING THE ‐ LONG‐TERM FUTURE GROWTH IN THIS AREA. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ WASTEWATER FUND WILL TAKE ON MAINTENANCE OF ‐ THE SYSTEM. ‐ DAVIS‐FOWLER INTERCEPTOR ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 1,250,000 WWIF22 (FY23) 346 539 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # BABCOCK SANITARY SEWER UPGRADE 245,000 DESCRIPTION: ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FY20 ‐ TO ACCOMMODATE FLOWS FROM PHASE 2 OF THE ICON ‐ APARTMENTS PROJECT, FERGUSON FARM, AND LUPINE ‐ VILLAGE AS WELL AS FUTURE IN‐FILL DEVELOPMENT, THE ‐ EXISTING 10‐INCH SANITARY SEWER MAIN IN W. ‐ BABCOCK MUST BE UPGRADED TO A 15‐INCH SANITARY ‐ SEWER MAIN FROM MANHOLE L0408 AT THE ‐ INTERSECTION OF RESORT DRIVE AND BABCOCK TO L0412 ‐ AT THE INTERSECTION OF BABCOCK AND COTTONWOOD. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ALLOWS INFILL DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED AS THIS ‐ SANITARY SEWER MAIN WILL BE AT CAPACITY AFTER ‐ DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE I OF ICON APARTMENTS ‐ AND VARIOUS SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS AT FERGUSON ‐ FARMS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL AS THIS WILL BE A CAPACITY UPGRADE OF AN ‐ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN. ‐ BABCOCK SANITARY SEWER UPGRADE UNSCHEDULED 245,000 WWIF35 347 540 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF INTERCEPTOR 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE OR PARALLEL 1200 FEET OF SEWER FROM I‐90 ‐ TO THE WRF. UPGRADE 30" OUTFALL TO 48" MAIN. ‐ WRF INTERCEPTOR 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE OR PARALLEL 1200 FEET OF SEWER FROM I‐90 ‐ TO THE WRF. UPGRADE 30" OUTFALL TO 48" MAIN. ‐ DESCRIPTION: 300,000 THIS IS A RETROFIT TO OUR OLDEST TRAIN BIOTRAIN #1 ‐ ADVANTAGE: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL CAPACITY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE ‐ OPERATION COST: ‐ NONE ‐ DESCRIPTION: 2,000,000 THIS IS A RETROFIT TO OUR OLDEST TRAIN BIOTRAIN #1 ‐ ADVANTAGE: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL CAPACITY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE ‐ OPERATION COST: ‐ NONE ‐ DOWNTOWN SEWER MAIN UPGRADES 3,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AND USE INTENSIFICATION IS ‐ PLACING DEMANDS ON SEWERS THAT ARE UNDERSIZED AND ‐ GREATER THAN 100 YEARS OLD. UPGRADES ARE NEEDED TO ‐ ACCOMMODATE INCREASED DENSITY DOWNTOWN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ WRF INTERCEPTOR 2023 50,000 WWIF44 (FY23) BIOTRAIN #1 RETROFIT 2022 300,000 WWIF45 (FY22) WRF INTERCEPTOR 2024 500,000 WWIF44 (FY24) DOWNTOWN SEWER MAIN UPGRADES UNSCHEDULED 3,000,000 WWIF46 BIOTRAIN #1 RETROFIT 2024 2,000,000 WWIF45 (FY24) 348 541 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WASTEWATER COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 125,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ GIVEN RAPID GROWTH AND THE DESIRE FOR INCREASED ‐ INFILL DENSITIES UPDATE THE WASTEWATER COLLECTION ‐ FACILITIES PLAN. THE HYDRAULIC MODEL UPDATE IN ‐ FY20 WILL BE A PREREQUISITE EFFORT FOR THIS UPDATE ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED ‐ IN THE PREVIOUS PLAN. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ HIDDEN VALLEY LIFT STATION 7,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DESIGN & CONSTRUCT HIDDEN VALLEY LIFT STATION & ‐ FORCE MAIN. THIS PROJECT WILL CONFORM TO THE ‐ CITY'S WASTEWATER COLLECTION FACILITIES PLAN. THE ‐ DAVIS LIFT STATION MUST BE UPGRADED TO ‐ ACCOMMODATE FLOWS FROM THE HIDDEN VALLEY LIFT ‐ STATION WHEN THE HIDDEN VALLEY LIFT STATION IS ‐ CONSTRUCTED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LIMIT DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTHWESTERN EDGE OF THE ‐ CITY DUE TO NO SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ OPERATING COSTS WILL BE PAID FROM THE CITY'S SEWER ‐ ENTERPRISE FUND. ‐ WASTEWATER COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 2021 125,000 WWIF47 HIDDEN VALLEY LIFT STATION UNSCHEDULED 7,000,000 WWIF48 349 542 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT UPGRADES 10,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DUE TO GROWTH ON OUR SYSTEM, WE WILL NEED TO ‐ EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF THE WRF. ‐ THE MONTANA DEQ DISCHARGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ‐ ARE BECOMING SIGNIFICANTLY MORE STRINGENT. THIS ‐ UPGRADE WILL INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES FOR MORE ‐ STRINGENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ‐ FUNDING: $10M WWIF 630 AND $50M WW620 ‐ COTTONWOOD SUBDIVISION SEWER OVERSIZING 400,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SEWER LINE NEEDS GREATER CAPACITY AND ‐ THIS PROJECT IS THE SUBDIVISION SEWER ‐ OVERSIZING FOR CAPACITY ‐ WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT UPGRADES UNSCHEDULED 10,000,000 WWIF49 COTTONWOOD SUBDIVISION SEWER OVERSIZING 2021 400,000 WWIF51 350 543 Water 351 544 WATER FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 1,008,079 $ 152,198 $ 1,035,375 $ 905,388 $ 2,517,734 $ 4,172,448 $ ‐ Plus: Water Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 2,972,017 $ 3,061,177 $ 3,153,012 $ 3,247,603 $ 3,345,031 $ 3,445,382 $ ‐ Plus: Loan or Financingfor Hyalite Dam Improvements W79 $ 4,000,000 Plus: Loan or Financing for Automation Upgrades W71 $ 6,710,000 Plus: Loan or Financing for Lyman Tank Construction $ 10,000,000 Less: FY19 Carryover Capital $ (1,285,397) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (2,542,500) $ (2,178,000) $ (3,283,000) $ (15,635,257) $ (8,400,316) $ (1,683,606) $ (355,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 152,198 $ 1,035,375 $ 905,388 $ 2,517,734 $ 4,172,448 $ 5,934,224 $ (355,000) Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Water Revenues $ 9,906,722 $ 9,906,722 $ 10,203,924 $ 10,510,041 $ 10,825,343 $ 11,150,103 Estimated Annual Increase 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Total Estimated Revenues $ 9,906,722 $ 10,203,924 $ 10,510,041 $ 10,825,343 $ 11,150,103 $ 11,484,606 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 26.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 2,972,017 $ 3,061,177 $ 3,153,012 $ 3,247,603 $ 3,345,031 $ 3,445,382 Projected Projected CURRENT $(2,178,000) $(3,283,000) $(15,635,257) $(8,400,316) $(1,683,606) $(355,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED WATER FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 352 545 WATER FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled W03 ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 ‐ W04‐21 WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐22 WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐23 WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐24 WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ W04‐25 WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ W47 REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 27,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W49 REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP ‐ 27,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W56 WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 ‐ W57 WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 ‐ W69 WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT ‐ 100,000 ‐ 100,000 ‐ 200,000 W71 PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADES ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,710,000 ‐ ‐ W72 PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES ‐ 1,750,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W79 HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ 4,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W87 LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN DESIGN 750,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W88 LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 10,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W90 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON ANALYZER ‐ ‐ 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W93 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ 60,000 ‐ ‐ W97 REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK ‐ ‐ ‐ 53,000 ‐ ‐ W98 REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 53,000 ‐ W99 HYALITE GUARDRAIL EXTENSION 70,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W100 REPLACE #3605 GMC CANYON ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 45,000 ‐ W101 WTP TANK OUTLET MONITOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ W102 REPLACE BACKHOE 1772 ‐ ‐ 142,054 ‐ ‐ ‐ W103 REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3157 ‐ ‐ 132,203 ‐ ‐ W104 REPLACE BACKHOE 3293 ‐ ‐ ‐ 146,316 ‐ ‐ W105 REPLACE BACKHOE 3419 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 150,706 ‐ W106 SCADA MASTER PLAN ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WC02 METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 ‐ WWW1 WHEELED EXCAVATOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 155,000 GF346 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,900 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,178,000 3,283,000 15,635,257 8,400,316 1,683,606 355,000 353 546 WATER FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This enterprise fund revenue source are rate fees charged to water users. We estimate water rates dedicated to capital will need to increase by at least 3% bringing the portion of Water Utility revenues that support capital to 31% in order to fund this capital plan. A full rate‐study and analysis is currently underway. $7,990,070 $8,398,899 $9,646,160 $9,281,821 $10,157,888 $9,396,171 $9,376,188 $‐ $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 5 yr avg FY15‐ FY19 Water Fund Revenue 354 547 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Numerous items have been adjusted or added based on current condition assessments and projections; including Water Pipe Replacements projects of $1,200,000 annually. Four projects require borrowing in the 5‐year horizon totaling over $20 million (W71, W79, and W88.). The largest project planned is Lyman Tank and Transmission Main scheduled for design in FY21 (W87) and construction in FY23 (W88). This project is to construct a new 5MG storage tank at Lyman. This would decommission the existing Lyman storage tank, Condition Assessment‐based repairs of the existing Lyman transmission main, new supply main tie in to new storage tank, new transmission main tie in from new storage tank to existing transmission main, new chlorination/fluoridation feed facility. Decommission Pear Street Booster Station if Hydraulic Grade Line of tank raised to meet Sourdough Tank. The Lyman water supply is a critical element of the city's overall water supply portfolio accounting for roughly 20% of annual supply volume to the city currently. The Water Treatment plant and Water Operations has replacement vehicles and equipment throughout the plan to the plan. Some larger equipment added this year are scheduled in FY23‐FY25 including replacing three back hoes (W102, W104 & W105) and a dump truck (W103). 355 548 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 25,000 THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 2021 25,000 W03 (FY21) ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 2022 25,000 W03 (FY22) ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 2023 25,000 W03 (FY23) 356 549 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 2024 25,000 W03 (FY24) ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 2025 25,000 W03 (FY25) 357 550 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2021 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE THE ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING ‐ FUNDS WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2022 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION (N 17TH FROM ‐ DURSTON TO THE END). THE REMAINING FUNDS WILL BE ‐ USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ASSESSMENTS ‐ AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2021 1,200,000 W04‐21 (FY21) WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2022 1,200,000 W04‐22 (FY22) 358 551 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2023 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2024 1,200,000 W04‐24 (FY24) WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2023 1,200,000 W04‐23 (FY23) 359 552 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES ‐ * PROJECT NAME IS INCORRECT ‐ CIP ITEM IS AS 27,000 FOLLOWS: ‐ REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS TO REPLACE A 1998 CHEVY WITH ‐ 70,779 MILES. AS OUR CREW GROWS THIS TYPE OF ‐ VEHICLE IS USED DAILY IN SUPPORT OF THE DEPT'S ‐ MISSION. THIS TRUCK RESPONDS TO ALL TYPES OF ‐ CALLS FROM LOCATING TO WITNESSING BORES TO A ‐ SUPPORT VEHICLE FOR EXCAVATION JOBS. USING AN ‐ OLDER VEHICLE BECOMES MORE UNRELIABLE, BUT IF WE ‐ HAD TO, WE COULD HOLD OFF A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE OLDER VEHICLE WHICH IS BECOMING ‐ UNRELIABLE & COSTLY TO MAINTAIN. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED RELIABILITY & SAFETY FOR STAFF. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ AS THE TRUCK AGES THERE WILL BE UNFORESEEN COSTS ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2025 1,200,000 W04‐25 (FY25) REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 2021 27,000 W47 360 553 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 27,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT REPLACES A 2002 CHEVY PICKUP WITH ‐ 85,816 MILES. THIS TRUCK IS USED FOR LEAK ‐ DETECTION, LOCATING, AND FIRE HYDRANT FLUSHING, ‐ WHICH ARE 3 CRITICAL PROGRAMS FOR OUR DEPARTMENT. ‐ THIS TRUCK WILL BE REPLACED WITH A MORE FUEL ‐ EFFICIENT VEHICLE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE OLDER PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WHICH IS ‐ BECOMING UNRELIABLE AND COSTLY TO MAINTAIN. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASE RELIABILITY AND SAFETY FOR STAFF. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ AS THE TRUCK AGES THERE WILL BE UNFORESEEN COSTS ‐ TO MAINTAIN THIS VEHICLE. ‐ WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME & NOT DEFER ‐ OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND, ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO BE ‐ POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ‐ PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 2021 40,000 W56 (FY21) REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 2022 27,000 W49 361 554 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME & NOT DEFER ‐ OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND, ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURE ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED AND BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 2022 40,000 W56 (FY22) 362 555 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND WILL ‐ PREVENT DEFERRMENT OF OTHER PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS ‐ FUND, MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A ‐ YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO BE ‐ POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ‐ PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 2023 40,000 W56 (FY23) 363 556 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND NOT ‐ DEFER OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT ‐ FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 2024 40,000 W56 (FY24) 364 557 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND NOT ‐ DEFER OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT ‐ FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 2025 40,000 W56 (FY25) 365 558 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM ‐ WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE OPERATOR ‐ IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING THE PROCESS. ‐ IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE RAW WATER INTAKES TO ‐ THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. IT WILL ALLOW ‐ STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPOSED ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE PROCESS AT ‐ A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION OF ‐ THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS ‐ WILL BE STREAMLINED AND WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE ‐ FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COST INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2021 30,000 W57 (FY21) 366 559 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES & COME UP WITH ‐ IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM WILL ‐ ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE OPERATOR'S ‐ IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING THE PROCESS. ‐ IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE RAW WATER INTAKES TO ‐ THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. IT WILL ALLOW ‐ STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPOSED ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE PROCESS ‐ AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION ‐ OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS ‐ WILL BE STREAMLINED AND WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE ‐ FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS ‐ STARTED WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT ‐ IS PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2022 30,000 W57 (FY22) 367 560 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM ‐ WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEMS IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE ‐ SURE THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS WILL BE ‐ STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2023 30,000 W57 (FY23) 368 561 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ‐ ITEM WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEM IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE ‐ THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE ‐ OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES ‐ THE PROCESS WILL BE STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY ‐ IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT KNOWING ‐ IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2024 30,000 W57 (FY24) 369 562 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ‐ ITEM WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEM IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE ‐ THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE ‐ OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES ‐ THE PROCESS WILL BE STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY ‐ IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT KNOWING ‐ IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 2025 30,000 W57 (FY25) 370 563 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PREPARE & EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END‐USERS. WORK‐AROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH HEAVY ‐ BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE ‐ STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & QUANTIFIABLE ‐ BENEFITS THAT IMPROVE PROJECT QUALITY, PROCESSES, ‐ OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. DEPENDING ‐ ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES COULD RESULT IN ‐ FOLLOW‐UP R & R. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NO INSPECTION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES & THEREBY OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY ‐ OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE WHOLE ASSET IF ‐ NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN ‐ CAN IDENTIFY ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ‐ ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED THEREBY ‐ SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY IN REPLACING ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING ORDER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2022 100,000 W69 (FY22) 371 564 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PREPARE & EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END‐USERS. WORK‐AROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH HEAVY ‐ BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE ‐ STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & QUANTIFIABLE ‐ BENEFITS THAT IMPROVE PROJECT QUALITY, PROCESSES, ‐ OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. DEPENDING ‐ ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES COULD RESULT IN ‐ FOLLOW‐UP R & R. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NO INSPECTION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES & THEREBY OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY ‐ OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE WHOLE ASSET IF ‐ NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN ‐ CAN IDENTIFY ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ‐ ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED THEREBY ‐ SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY IN REPLACING ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING ORDER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2024 100,000 W69 (FY24) 372 565 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PREPARE & EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END‐USERS. WORK‐AROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH HEAVY ‐ BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE ‐ STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & QUANTIFIABLE ‐ BENEFITS THAT IMPROVE PROJECT QUALITY, PROCESSES, ‐ OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. DEPENDING ‐ ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES COULD RESULT IN ‐ FOLLOW‐UP R & R. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NO INSPECTION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES & THEREBY OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY ‐ OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE WHOLE ASSET IF ‐ NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN ‐ CAN IDENTIFY ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ‐ ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED THEREBY ‐ SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY IN REPLACING ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING ORDER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT UNSCHEDULED 200,000 W69 (UNSCHEDULED) 373 566 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION 6,710,000 UPGRADES ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADE PRESSURE INSTRUMENTATION, AUTOMATE VALVE ‐ ACTUATION, AND PROVIDE A LAN CONNECTION & SCADA ‐ PROGRAMMING FOR REALTIME MONITORING & REMOTE ‐ CONTROL OF PRV SETTINGS. WITHOUT THIS PROJECT, ‐ SYSTEM OPERATORS ARE WITHOUT VITAL DATA ON SYSTEM ‐ OPERATING CONDITIONS. LIMITED REAL TIME DATA ‐ ALLOWS OPERATORS TO ANTICIPATE, DIAGNOSE, OR ‐ CORRECT ABNORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS. ‐ STANDARDIZED PRESSURE CONTROL OFFERS IMPROVED ‐ PROTECTIONS FROM SURGE CONDITIONS WHICH ARE A ‐ LIKELY CAUSE OF PIPE FAILURE. IT WILL ALSO ‐ IMPROVE SERVICE LEVELS TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS ‐ WHERE PRESSURE TRANSIENTS CAUSE LEAKS IN SPRINKLER ‐ SYSTEMS OR WITHIN CUSTOMER PREMISES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE IMPROVED ‐ ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING CONFINED ‐ SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE AND IMPROVE ‐ SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT SYSTEM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES. ‐ PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADES 2024 6,710,000 W71 374 567 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES 1,750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADE HATCH/ENTRY, VALVING, PIPING, PRESSURE ‐ SETTINGS, SUMP PUMPS AND PROVIDE POWER, WHICH WILL ‐ PROVIDE OPERATORS WITH A SAFE WORK ENVIRONMENT, ‐ AND SETS PRVS AT OPERATING PRESSURES AT PRESSURE ‐ ZONE INTERFACES CONSISTENT WITH THE WFPU ‐ RECOMMENDATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, IT WILL PROVIDE ‐ NECESSARY UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT, PIPING AND ‐ VALVING IN PRV VAULTS TO REDUCE LIKELIHOOD OF ‐ FAILURES. STANDARDIZED PRESSURE CONTROLS OFFERS ‐ IMPROVED PROTECTIONS FROM SURGE CONDITIONS, WHICH ‐ ARE LIKELY CAUSES OF PIPE FAILURE. IT IMPROVES ‐ SERVICE LEVELS TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS WHERE ‐ PRESSURE TRANSIENTS CAUSE LEAKS IN SPRINKLER ‐ SYSTEMS OR WITHIN CUSTOMERS' PREMISES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE IMPROVED ‐ ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING CONFINED ‐ SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE AND IMPROVE ‐ SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT SYSTEM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES. ‐ PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES 2022 1,750,000 W72 375 568 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS 4,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ARMORING OF THE CONTROL TOWER (TO ENABLE SOME ‐ YEAR‐OVER‐YEAR STORAGE CAPACITY) AND CONTROL ‐ UPGRADES TO IMPROVE WINTER OPERATION. CURRENT ‐ VULNERABILITY OF BOZEMAN TO DROUGHT IS VERY HIGH, ‐ DUE TO THE LACK OF SOURCES THAT ARE ROBUST IN ‐ DROUGHT (LARGE RAW WATER RESERVOIRS WITH YEAR‐OVER ‐ ‐YEAR STORAGE CAPACITY, LARGE RIVERS, OR ‐ GROUNDWATER). HYALITE RESERVOIR IS CAPABLE OF ‐ PROVIDING YEAR‐OVER‐YEAR STORAGE, BUT IS NOT ‐ OPERATED IN THAT MANNER DUE TO CONCERNS OF ICE ‐ DAMAGE TO THE CONTROL TOWER. THIS INCREASES THE ‐ RISK OF AN EXTREMELY DRY YEAR RESULTING IN ‐ THE INABILITY TO FILL THE HYALITE RESERVOIR WITH ‐ ENOUGH WATER FOR THE CITY AND IRRIGATION USES. ‐ THIS PROJECT COULD POTENTIALLY REMOVE THE 20% ‐ SURCHARGE THE CITY PAYS FOR HYALITE RELEASES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO DEAL WITH CURRENT HYALITE DAM ‐ OPERATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DROUGHT MITIGATION, IMPROVED WATER USE AND COST ‐ EFFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS 2023 4,000,000 W79 376 569 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN 750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DESIGN WITH CONSTRUCTION IN FY23 ‐ CONSTRUCT A NEW 5MG STORAGE TANK AT LYMAN, ‐ DECOMMISSIONING EXISTING LYMAN STORAGE TANK, ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT‐BASED REPAIRS OF THE EXISTING ‐ LYMAN TANK & TRANSMISSION MAIN DESIGN ‐ LYMAN TRANSMISSION MAIN, NEW SUPPLY MAIN TIE IN TO ‐ NEW STORAGE TANK, NEW TRANSMISSION MAIN TIE IN ‐ FROM NEW STORAGE TANK TO EXISTING TRANSMISSION ‐ MAIN, NEW CHLORINATION/FLUORIDATION FEED FACILITY. ‐ DESIGN ONLY NO ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS. ‐ LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN DESIGN 2021 750,000 W87 377 570 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION 10,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT A NEW 5MG STORAGE TANK AT LYMAN, ‐ DECOMMISSIONING EXISTING LYMAN STORAGE TANK, ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT‐BASED REPAIRS OF THE EXISTING ‐ LYMAN TRANSMISSION MAIN, NEW SUPPLY MAIN TIE IN TO ‐ NEW STORAGE TANK, NEW TRANSMISSION MAIN TIE IN ‐ FROM NEW STORAGE TANK TO EXISTING TRANSMISSION ‐ MAIN, NEW CHLORINATION/FLUORIDATION FEED FACILITY. ‐ DECOMMISSION PEAR STREET BOOSTER STATION IF ‐ HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE OF TANK RAISED TO MEET ‐ SOURDOUGH TANK. THE LYMAN WATER SUPPLY IS A ‐ CRITICAL ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S OVERALL WATER ‐ SUPPLY PORTFOLIO ACCOUNTING FOR ROUGHLY 20% OF ‐ ANNUAL SUPPLY VOLUME TO THE CITY CURRENTLY. THE ‐ SOURCE PROVIDES SUPPLY REDUNDANCY & RESILIENCY AS ‐ IT IS GEOGRAPHICALLY REMOVED FROM THE SOURDOUGH/ ‐ HYALITE SOURCE & PROVIDES AN INDEPENDENT ‐ CONNECTION TO THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. THE ‐ EFFECTIVE AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY IS INCREASED ‐ SINCE THE NEW STORAGE SYSTEM WILL NOT LEAK & WILL ‐ EXPAND THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS ABLE TO BE SUPPLIED ‐ BY LYMAN WATER. LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURE OF LYMAN ‐ SUPPLY SYSTEM WILL BE DRAMATICALLY REDUCED BY ‐ REPLACED STORAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION OF EXISTING LYMAN SYSTEM. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REPLACES LYMAN STORAGE TANK WHICH IS AT THE END OF ‐ ITS USEFUL LIFE. INCREASES EFFECTIVE AVAILABLE ‐ SUPPLY AS EXISTING TANK LEAKS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANTICIPATED OPERATING COST REDUCTION RELATED TO ‐ PEAR STREET BOOSTER DECOMMISSIONING. ‐ LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION 2023 10,000,000 W88 378 571 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # TOC ANALYZER 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WE DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE A TOC ANALYZER IN THE LAB. ‐ IT WILL INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ANALYZING SAMPLES ‐ ON SITE INSTEAD OF SENDING TO A LAB AND WAITING ‐ FOR RESULTS. TURN AROUND TIME WILL BE REDUCED ‐ SUBSTANTIALLY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE OUTSIDE LABS AND WAIT LONG PERIODS ‐ FOR RESULTS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REDUCED LAB COSTS AND WAIT TIME. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF MAINTENANCE/SNOW PLOW VEHICLE. ‐ TRUCK GETS HEAVY USE AND IS CRITICAL TO OPERATIONS ‐ AND MAINTENANCE OF BOTH THE SOURDOUGH PLANT & ‐ LYMAN CREEK. IT IS A 2008 WITH HIGH MILEAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ RISK OF VEHICLE BREAKDOWN AND INCREASED ‐ REPAIR COSTS AS VEHICLE HAS HIGH MILEAGE & IS ‐ USED DAILY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REDUCED MAINTENANCE COSTS AND DOWN TIME. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT 2024 60,000 W93 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON ANALYZER 2023 30,000 W90 379 572 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK 3361 53,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF 2006 1 TON SERVICE TRUCK WITH ‐ 55328 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NONE ‐ REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK 3402 53,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 1 TON TRUCK WITH 57593 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ LEASE OR RENT ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ HYALITE GUARDRAIL 70,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THESE ARE MATCHING FUNDS TO THE FOREST SERVICE TO ‐ INSTALL GUARDRAIL ON HYALITE ROAD NEAR THE CITY'S ‐ WATER INTAKE. THERE WERE MULTIPLE CAR ACCIDENTS ‐ IN THIS VICINITY IN 2019 POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ‐ CITY WATER SUPPLY AT THE RAW WATER INTAKE. NEW ‐ GUARDRAIL WILL HELP PREVENT VEHICLE ACCIDENTS INTO ‐ THE CREEK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ REPLACEMENT 1 TON TRUCK 2025 53,000 W98 HYALITE GUARDRAIL EXTENSION REPLACEMENT 1 TON TRUCK 2024 53,000 W97 2021 70,000 W99 380 573 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE #3605 GMC CANYON 45,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS VEHICLE REPLACES #3605 THAT HAS BEEN USED ‐ ROUTINELY FOR SAMPLING UNTIL 2018. ‐ IT CURRENTLY HAS OVER 50,000 MILES ON IT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE DRIVING #3605 AND RISK BREAK DOWNS & ‐ INCREASED MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ ADVANTAGES TO APPROVAL: ‐ NEW VEHICLE WILL BE MORE RELIABLE & RESULT IN ‐ LOWER MAINTENANCE & REPAIR COSTS ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ WTP TANK OUTLET MONITORING 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE NEED TO MONITOR WATER QUALITY LEAVING THE WTP ‐ TANK IS GOING TO BECOME NECESSARY AS THE CITY ADDS REDUNDANT LINES TO TOWN. IN ORDER TO MEET CT REQUIREMENTS, CHLORINE, PH, AND FLOW WILL HAVE TO BE MONITORED AT THE OUTLET OF THE TANK. PUTTING A DOGHOUSE STRUCTURE WITH HEATING, POWER, AND VENTILATION TO HOUSE THE ANALYZER EQUIPMENT ON THE OUTLET PIPE OF THE WTP TANK WITH TAPS INTO THE PIP WILL ACCOMPLISH THIS. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT BEING ABLE TO USE THE WTP TANK FOR CT VALUE ‐ CALCULATION AND RISK BEING OUT OF COMPLIANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ BEING ABLE TO BETTER TRACK WATER QUALITY AND ADD ‐ CONNECTIONS BEFORE THE SOURDOUGH TANK AND AT ‐ THE END OF FUTURE PIPES TO TOWN. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL FOR CALIBRATION STANDARDS AND EQUIPMENT ‐ REPLACE #3605 GMC CANYON 2024 45,000 W100 WTP TANK OUTLET MONITOR 2025 100,000 W101 381 574 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE BACKHOE 1772 142,054 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE 1996 BACKHOE WITH 5007 HOURS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED NONE ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3157 132,203 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCK WITH DOUBLE AXLE ‐ EXISTING 2004 DUMP TRUCK WITH 34821 MILES ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED NONE ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE REPLACE BACKHOE 146,316 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2006 CATERPILLAR BACKHOE WITH 2856 HR ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED RENT OR LEASE ADDITIONAL OPERATION COSTS NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE REPLACE BACKHOE 1772 2023 142,054 W102 REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3157 2023 132,203 W103 REPLACE BACKHOE 3293 2024 146,316 W104 382 575 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # REPLACE BACKHOE 3419 150,706 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 BACKHOE WITH 3077 HOURS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED NONE ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE SCADA MASTER PLAN 75,000 EVALUATE OPTIONS AND DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS ‐ FOR AREA‐WIDE NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION FOR PLANNED ‐ REMOTE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE. DEVELOP SCADA DESIGN, ‐ EQUIPMENT, AND SCADA TAGGING AND PROGRAMMING ‐ STANDARDS. FORMULATE DATA ACCESSIBILITY AND SCADA ‐ INTEGRATION WITH OTHER CITY APPLICATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION OF LIMITED SCADA WITHIN ‐ DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND PLANT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ MOVED FROM FY18. ‐ 2022 75,000 W106 REPLACE BACKHOE 3419 2025 150,706 W105 SCADA MASTER PLAN 383 576 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY FOR ‐ CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH REAL TIME ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 2021 36,000 WC02 (FY21) 384 577 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY FOR ‐ CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST PRACTICE ‐ STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH REAL TIME ‐ INFORAMTION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 2022 36,000 WC02 (FY22) 385 578 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MGMT ALERTS ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL FOR BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION AND WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS AND INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 2023 36,000 WC02 (FY23) METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 2024 36,000 WC02 (FY24) 386 579 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MGMT ALERTS ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL FOR BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION AND WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS AND INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURE ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED AND BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WHEELED EXCAVATOR UNSCHEDULED 155,000 WWW1 METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 2025 36,000 WC02 (FY25) 387 580 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 3,900 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON ‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION ‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 2025 3,900 GF346 388 581 Water Impact Fee 389 582 WATER IMPACT FEE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Unscheduled Projected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP $ 5,121,337 $ 2,388,425 $ 2,868,137 $ 2,644,074 $ 2,916,926 $ 3,501,273 $ ‐ Plus: Impact Fee Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,888,070 $ 1,944,712 $ 2,003,053 $ 2,063,145 $ 2,125,039 $ 2,188,791 $ ‐ Plus: Loan for Well Field WIF32 $ 6,500,000 Plus: Loan for Sourdough Transmission Main, PH 2 WIF40 $ 4,320,000 Less: Carryover FY19 Capital Projects $ (2,645,254) Less: Debt payments (WIF03 WIF 32, and WIF40) $ (600,000) $ (877,116) $ (1,390,293) $ (1,390,693) $ (1,390,693) Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs $ (6,295,729) $ (865,000) $ (7,850,000) $ (400,000) $ (150,000) ‐ $ (10,000,000) Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP $ 2,388,425 $ 2,868,137 $ 2,644,074 $ 2,916,926 $ 3,501,273 $ 4,299,370 Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current Year FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Estimated Annual Water Impact Fee Revenues $ 1,888,070 $ 1,888,070 $ 1,944,712 $ 2,003,053 $ 2,063,145 $ 2,125,039 Estimated Annual Increase 0.0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Total Estimated Revenues $ 1,888,070 $ 1,944,712 $ 2,003,053 $ 2,063,145 $ 2,125,039 $ 2,188,791 Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Water Capacity Expansion CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP $ 1,888,070 $ 1,944,712 $ 2,003,053 $ 2,063,145 $ 2,125,039 $ 2,188,791 Projected Projected CURRENT $(865,000) $(7,850,000) $(400,000) $(150,000) ‐ $(10,000,000) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULED WATER IMPACT FEE PROJECTS 390 583 WATER IMPACT FEE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Unscheduled WIF28 5126 WEST SOURDOUGH RESERVOIR 1 ‐ SITING 350,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WIF32 GROUNDWATER WELL FIELD AND TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION 500,000 7,500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WIF37 SOURDOUGH CANYON NATURAL STORAGE ‐ PLANNING & DESIGN 25,000 ‐ ‐ 150,000 ‐ ‐ WIF51 SOURDOUGH CANYON NATURAL STORAGE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10,000,000 WIF52 WATER MAIN COTTONWOOD ROAD BETWEEN OAK TO BAXTER ‐ ‐ 400,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WIF53 NELSON MEADOWS WATER MAIN OVERSIZING 340,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fiscal Year totals 865,000 7,850,000 400,000 150,000 ‐ 10,000,000 391 584 WATER IMPACT FEE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This enterprise fund revenue source is impact fees. Revenue estimates for Water Impact Fees have been updated with the 5‐year average collection amount, detailed on the following page. Revenues have grown on average by 6 % per year, over the past 5 years. For the CIP, we have used the 5‐year Average collection, plus 3% growth each year from FY21 to FY25. $1,663,000.00 $2,262,000.00 $1,885,123.00 $2,757,565.00 $2,042,324.00 2,122,002.40 $‐ $500,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $3,000,000.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Average FY15‐ 19 Water Impact Fee Revenues 392 585 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY WIF32 Groundwater Well Field and Transmission Construction ‐ Water right permitting and mitigation plan; purchase of mitigation water rights; construction of aquifer recharge or other mitigation infrastructure; acquisition of land for well field site; construction of wells, power, power backup, instrumentation and controls, SCADA, control building and site improvements; and transmission main construction to tie ground water supply into the existing system. Beginning in FY21 with design and construction in the following year (FY22) for an estimated total of $8 million. This is critical for meeting long‐range water supply needs and enhancing overall water supply resiliency and redundancy. It enhances connectivity by providing a redundant water supply source in the event of Sourdough WTP outage. A significant amount of borrowing has been incurred for Projects WIF03, and WIF 40 and more will be incurred with WIF32. Over $10 million will need to be borrowed to complete these three projects. Because of the uncertainty of the revenue stream, the Water Utility will need to borrow via revenue bonds and be reimbursed by the Water Impact Fee Fund. There may be rate‐requirements to support this borrowing which were included as part of our more recent Water rate study. The estimated borrowing is outlined in the table below: The project highlighted above aids in our efforts towards the Strategic Plan 6.1 a Watershed Management. Debt‐ Description Project # FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Loan Debt Service ‐ WTP 5.3MG Water Storage Reservoir (WIF03) WIF14 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Debt Service for Borrowing ‐ Transmission Main (WIF40) WIF45 277,116 277,116 277,116 277,116 Debt Service for Borrowing ‐ Well Field (WIF 32) WIF43 513,177 513,577 513,577 600,000 877,116 1,390,293 1,390,693 1,390,693 Estimated Debt Schedule 393 586 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # 5126 WEST SOURDOUGH RESERVOIR 1 ‐ SITING 350,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SITING STUDY AND LAND ACQUISITION FOR 5MG GROUND ‐ STORAGE RESERVOIR TO SERVE 5126 PRESSURE ZONE ‐ FROM WEST TRANSMISSION MAIN. THE WEST ‐ SOURDOUGH RESERVOIR WILL BE THE NEXT NECESSARY ‐ RESERVOIR FOR THE CITY TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE ‐ ADEQUATE POTABLE WATER AND FIRE FLOW. PROPER ‐ SITING OF THIS RESERVOIR WILL PROVIDE REDUNDANT ‐ SUPPLY TO SOURDOUGH AND HILLTOP RESERVOIRS. IT ‐ WILL INCREASE WATER STORAGE CAPACITY BY 5MG, AND ‐ WILL PROVIDE GREATER EFFICIENCY IN PROVIDING ‐ POTABLE WATER AND FIRE FLOWS TO THE CITY'S WESTERN ‐ AREAS. BETTER ABILITY TO TAKE SOURDOUGH OR HILLTOP ‐ RESERVOIRS OFFLINE AND STILL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT ‐ STORAGE. OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ‐ GROUNDWATER PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND ‐ CONSTRUCTION WEST TRANSMISSION MAIN STUDY, ‐ DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION; RESERVOIR DESIGN, ‐ CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT UNTIL THE NEED FOR THE RESERVOIR IS MORE ‐ IMMINENT ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROCUREMENT OF LAND WHILE IT IS AVAILABLE, AND ‐ LESS EXPENSIVE ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN AND WOULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE WATER ‐ FUND. ‐ 5126 WEST SOURDOUGH RESERVOIR 1 ‐ SITING 2022 350,000 WIF28 394 587 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GROUNDWATER WELL FIELD AND TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTI 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WATER RIGHT PERMITTING AND MITIGATION PLAN; ‐ PURCHASE OF MITIGATION WATER RIGHTS; CONSTRUCTION ‐ OF AQUIFER RECHARGE OR OTHER MITIGATION ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE; ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR WELL FIELD ‐ SITE; CONSTRUCTION OF WELLS, POWER, POWER BACKUP, ‐ INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS, SCADA, CONTROL ‐ BUILDING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS; AND TRANSMISSION ‐ MAIN CONSTRUCTION TO TIE GW SUPPLY INTO THE ‐ EXISTING SYSTEM. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL FOR ‐ MEETING LONG‐RANGE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS AND ‐ ENHANCING OVERALL WATER SUPPLY RESILIENCY AND ‐ REDUNDANCY. IT ENHANCES CONNECTIVITY BY PROVIDING ‐ A REDUNDANT WATER SUPPLY SOURCE IN THE EVENT OF ‐ SOURDOUGH WTP OUTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE ‐ IMPROVED ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING ‐ CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE ‐ AND IMPROVE SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT ‐ SYSTEM. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES ‐ GROUNDWATER WELL FIELD AND TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION 2021 500,000 WIF32 395 588 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # GROUNDWATER WELL FIELD AND TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTI 7,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WATER RIGHT PERMITTING AND MITIGATION PLAN; ‐ PURCHASE OF MITIGATION WATER RIGHTS; CONSTRUCTION ‐ OF AQUIFER RECHARGE OR OTHER MITIGATION ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE; ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR WELL FIELD ‐ SITE; CONSTRUCTION OF WELLS, POWER, POWER BACKUP, ‐ INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS, SCADA, CONTROL ‐ BUILDING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS; AND TRANSMISSION ‐ MAIN CONSTRUCTION TO TIE GW SUPPLY INTO THE ‐ EXISTING SYSTEM. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL FOR ‐ MEETING LONG‐RANGE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS AND ‐ ENHANCING OVERALL WATER SUPPLY RESILIENCY AND ‐ REDUNDANCY. IT ENHANCES CONNECTIVITY BY PROVIDING ‐ A REDUNDANT WATER SUPPLY SOURCE IN THE EVENT OF ‐ SOURDOUGH WTP OUTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE ‐ IMPROVED ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING ‐ CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE ‐ AND IMPROVE SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT ‐ SYSTEM. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES ‐ GROUNDWATER WELL FIELD AND TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION 2022 7,500,000 WIF32 396 589 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SOURDOUGH STORAGE PLAN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ MAYOR ANDRUS PROVIDED A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO MSU ‐ TO STUDY NATURAL WATER STORAGE IN THE SOURDOUGH ‐ DRAINAGE. THIS WOULD BE A GRANT MATCH TO SUPPORT ‐ MSU RESEARCH AND SUBSEQUENT WATER SUPPLY NEEDS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ ADDITIONAL COMPONENT OF THE PLAN & ADDITIONAL ‐ FUNDING ‐ SOURDOUGH CANYON NATURAL STORAGE ‐ PLANNING & DESIGN 150,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ALTERNATIVES PLANNING AND DESIGN FOR SOURDOUGH ‐ NATURAL STORAGE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT. THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL INCREASE RESILIENCY OF SOURDOUGH WATERSHED TO ‐ DROUGHT IMPACTS AND PROVIDES AUGMENTED WATER ‐ SUPPLY, PROTECTS EXISTING MUNICIPAL WATER RIGHTS, ‐ AND IT AUGMENTS WATER SUPPLY CAPACITY OF ‐ SOURDOUGH WATERSHED. THIS IMPACTS THE CITY'S LONG‐ ‐ TERM WATER RIGHTS AND HELPS CLOSE THE APPROACHING ‐ WATER SUPPLY GAP. THIS PROJECT COULD HAVE ‐ POTENTIAL FEMA INVOLVEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE FINAL SIZING OF ‐ WEST TRANSMISSION MAIN. IT WILL ALSO INFORM LONG‐ ‐ TERM GROUNDWATER NEEDS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ POSTPONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPLEMENTS IWRP, AUGMENTS SOURDOUGH WATER ‐ SUPPLY CAPACITY, AND INCREASES RESILIENCY OF ‐ SOURDOUGH WATER SUPPLY BY PROVIDING 'STORAGE' ‐ TO REDUCE THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF DROUGHT IMPACTS ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ SOURDOUGH CANYON NATURAL STORAGE ‐ PLANNING & DESIGN 2021 WIF37 (FY21) 25,000 SOURDOUGH CANYON NATURAL STORAGE ‐ PLANNING & DESIGN 2024 150,000 WIF37 (FY24) 397 590 Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project # SOURDOUGH CANYON NATURAL STORAGE 10,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ALTERNATIVES PLANNING & DESIGN FOR SOURDOUGH ‐ STORAGE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT. THIS PROJECT WILL ‐ INCREASE RESILIENCY OF SOURDOUGH WATERSHED TO ‐ DROUGHT IMPACTS & PROVIDES AUGMENTED WATER SUPPLY, ‐ PROTECTS EXISTING MUNICIPAL WATER RIGHTS, AND IT ‐ AUGMENTS WATER SUPPLY CAPACITY OF SOURDOUGH ‐ WATERSHED. THIS IMPACTS THE CITY'S LONG‐TERM WATER ‐ RIGHTS & HELPS CLOSE THE APPROACHING WATER SUPPLY ‐ GAP. THIS PROJECT COULD HAVE POTENTIAL FEMA ‐ INVOLVEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ POSTPONE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ WATER MAIN COTTONWOOD ROAD BETWEEN OAK TO BAXTER 400,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ 16‐INCH WATER MAIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN COTTONWOOD ‐ ROAD BETWEEN OAK AND BAXTER TO MATCH OUR STREET ‐ PROJECT IN FY 23. THAT WATER MAIN IS SHOWN IN ‐ THE WATER MASTER PLAN, AND WE NEED TO MAKE SURE IT ‐ IS CONSTRUCTED WHEN THE ROAD PROJECT IS ‐ CONSTRUCTED. ‐ NELSON MEADOWS WATER MAIN OVERSIZING 340,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DEVELOPER REQUIRED TO INSTALL 16" WATER MAIN PER ‐ THE CITY'S WATER FACILITY PLAN. THIS IS AN ‐ OVERSIZING COST FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SIZE. ‐ EXACT COST TO BE VERIFIED. ‐ NELSON MEADOWS WATER MAIN OVERSIZING 2021 340,000 WIF53 SOURDOUGH CANYON NATURAL STORAGE UNSCHEDULED 10,000,000 WIF51 WATER MAIN COTTONWOOD ROAD BETWEEN OAK TO BAXTER 2023 400,000 WIF52 398 591 COSTS. SOME PROJECTS HAVE VERY LOW ONGOING COSTS OTHERS HAVE RELATIVELY HIGHER COSTS. ‐ PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANT 2023 150,000 GF031 141 334 80 273 e d d u r i n g P u b l i c M e e t i n g s h e l d N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 9 – J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 188