Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-16-19 City Commission Packet Materials - C9. TO 9 of the PSMTO with AE2S for Engineering Services for Sourdough Reservoir Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Brian Heaston, Senior Engineer Mitch Reister, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to execute Task Order No. 9 of the Professional Services Master Task Order Agreement with the firm of AE2S, Inc. providing professional engineering services for the Bozeman Sourdough & Lyman Reservoir Inspection and Evaluation project. MEETING DATE: December 16, 2019 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Consent RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute Task Order No. 9 of the Professional Services Master Task Order Agreement with the firm of AE2S, Inc. providing professional engineering services for the Bozeman Sourdough & Lyman Reservoir Inspection and Evaluation project. BACKGROUND: AE2S, Inc. provides professional engineering services on as on call basis for the Bozeman Water Treatment Plant facility (WTP) under a Master Task Order Agreement entered into on April 24, 2017. Task Order No. 9 attached provides professional engineering services for the Bozeman Sourdough & Lyman Reservoir Inspection and Evaluation project. Under this task order agreement, AE2S will hire and manage wet inspection services to collect data necessary to produce a report documenting inspection findings and conclusions along with recommendations and cost estimates for tank rehabilitation activities. Sourdough Tank was completed and brought into service in 1957. It is a partially buried 4 million gallon concrete potable water storage tank fed by the Sourdough Water Treatment Plant. Exterior concrete rehabilitation was completed in the mid 2000’s. Interior concrete rehabilitation has not occurred over the life of tank and is likely needed it has been in continuous service for 62 years. Prior wet inspections of the tank interior have found evidence of concrete deterioration. A more intensive wet inspection will occur under Task Order No. 9 to accurately identify location and extent of concrete deteriorations as well as condition assessment of other interior tank elements such as the tank inlet/outlet and overflow pipes. Inspection findings will inform recommendations and associated cost estimates for interior tank rehabilitation activities. Lyman Tank was originally completed and brought into service in the late 1880’s and is fed by Lyman Spring. Its original configuration was expanded over time to its current 5.3 million 154 gallon capacity. Much of the original concrete work, now approximately 130 years old, remains integral to the tank. A major rehabilitation consisting of concrete spot repairs, plastic liner installation, and construction of a roof was completed in 2004. The liner has not performed adequately since its installation and leaks at a rate upwards of 100 gallons per minute. Findings and conclusions of the wet inspection will inform recommendations and associated cost estimates for rehabilitation activities to stem liner leakage or perhaps even call for full capital replacement of the Lyman Tank given its age and condition. FISCAL EFFECTS: The approved FY20 Water Fund CIP contains project W84, funded at $600,000, for Sourdough Tank Inspection & Improvements. Task Order No. 9 contains a negotiated fee not to exceed $46,872 which includes scope to inspect both Sourdough and Lyman tanks. After debiting Task Order No. 9 from the W84 funding allocation, an unobligated project fund balance of $553,128 remains for design and construction of Sourdough Tank rehabilitation improvements. Lyman Tank inspection is included as both a matter of convenience and necessity given the age of Lyman Tank and the specialized skills and equipment necessary to perform wet inspection of potable water storage facilities. Inspection findings and conclusions for Lyman Tank will provide information necessary to inform if full capital replacement, currently scheduled in FY21 Water Fund CIP as project W88 at $10mln, can be delayed by a less expensive rehabilitation project or should be undertaken as currently planned in the CIP. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the Commission ATTACHMENTS: Task Order No. 9 Hyperlinked: Professional Services Master Task Order Agreement Report compiled on December 5, 2019 155 156 157 158 159