HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-02-19 City Commission Packet Materials - C5. Water Fund CIP for FY21-25
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Adopt the Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal
Years 2021-2025.
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Consent
MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for
Fiscal Years 2021 - 2025.
BACKGROUND: Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a 5 Year Capital
Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th. The Public Works
Department, City Manager, and other city staff met during September - October to develop the
attached Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the capital needs of the equipment and capital
needs of the Water Fund. The Water Fund CIP tracks the capital equipment replacements and
construction projects for Water Operations (distribution system) and the Water Treatment Plant.
Similar to recent years past, we are bringing the various parts of the plan forward as items on the
Consent agenda. We will be prepared to address questions, if they arise, at the public meeting.
Public Works Master Plan in Progress
The Public Works Department is currently having a master plan drafted that will address the
Department’s space needs. This will include space for workers based on the staffing plan and
40
projected growth, equipment storage based on the CIP and other master plans, and shop space.
The completion of this plan will most likely change all Public Works’ funds CIPs next year.
Stiff Building Remodel FY20 Project Changes
The FY20 Approved Budget contains a total of $656,116 for the Stiff Building Remodel, funded
from the General, Community Development, and Building Inspection Funds. This estimate was
made from initial information developed more than 5 years ago, prior to Phase 1 of the project
(basement conference room, etc.). After we completed the final programming on this next phase,
the project has expanded to include other departments within the building with a focus on
centralizing customer service, accommodating future staffing needs, and improved safety. The
project is in final design stages and will be bid in mid-November. Our most recent estimates
show the project could total between $1.2- $1.5 Million. These increased costs have not been
added to the CIP or reflected in the FY20 amounts shown. Once bids are received, we will likely
recommend making adjustments to the FY20 Budget by delaying or canceling current projects,
using budget or vacancy savings, and/or possibly budget amendments.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. If the Commission does not
wish to adopt this schedule tonight, it can be scheduled for approval on a later agenda.
41
FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the
Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for
FY21.
Report compiled on: November 14, 2019
Attached: Water Fund CIP
42
WATER FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current YearFY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25UnscheduledProjected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP 1,008,079$ 152,198$ 1,035,375$ 905,388$ 2,517,734$ 4,172,448$ ‐$ Plus: Water Revenues Dedicated to CIP 2,972,017$ 3,061,177$ 3,153,012$ 3,247,603$ 3,345,031$ 3,445,382$ ‐$ Plus: Loan or Financingfor Hyalite Dam Improvements W79 4,000,000$ Plus: Loan or Financing for Automation Upgrades W71 6,710,000$ Plus: Loan or Financing for Lyman Tank Construction 10,000,000$ Less: FY19 Carryover Capital (1,285,397)$ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs (2,542,500)$ (2,178,000)$ (3,283,000)$ (15,635,257)$ (8,400,316)$ (1,683,606)$ (355,000)$ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP 152,198$ 1,035,375$ 905,388$ 2,517,734$ 4,172,448$ 5,934,224$ (355,000)$ Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current YearFY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25Estimated Annual Water Revenues 9,906,722$ 9,906,722$ 10,203,924$ 10,510,041$ 10,825,343$ 11,150,103$ Estimated Annual Increase 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%Total Estimated Revenues 9,906,722$ 10,203,924$ 10,510,041$ 10,825,343$ 11,150,103$ 11,484,606$ Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 26.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP 2,972,017$ 3,061,177$ 3,153,012$ 3,247,603$ 3,345,031$ 3,445,382$ ProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(2,178,000)$(3,283,000)$(15,635,257)$(8,400,316)$(1,683,606)$(355,000)FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULEDWATER FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 43
WATER FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 UnscheduledW03 ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 ‐ W04‐21WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐22WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐23WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐24WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ W04‐25WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ W47 REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 27,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W49 REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP ‐ 27,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W56 WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 ‐ W57 WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 ‐ W69 WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT ‐ 100,000 ‐ 100,000 ‐ 200,000 W71 PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADES ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,710,000 ‐ ‐ W72 PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES ‐ 1,750,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W79 HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ 4,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W87LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN DESIGN 750,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W88 LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 10,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W90 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON ANALYZER ‐ ‐ 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W93 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ 60,000 ‐ ‐ W97REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK ‐ ‐ ‐ 53,000 ‐ ‐ W98REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 53,000 ‐ W99HYALITE GUARDRAIL EXTENSION 70,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W100REPLACE #3605 GMC CANYON ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 45,000 ‐ W101WTP TANK OUTLET MONITOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ W102REPLACE BACKHOE 1772 ‐ ‐ 142,054 ‐ ‐ ‐ W103REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3157 ‐ ‐ 132,203 ‐ ‐ W104REPLACE BACKHOE 3293 ‐ ‐ ‐ 146,316 ‐ ‐ W105REPLACE BACKHOE 3419 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 150,706 ‐ W106SCADA MASTER PLAN ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WC02 METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 ‐ WWW1WHEELED EXCAVATOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 155,000 GF346FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,900 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,178,000 3,283,000 15,635,257 8,400,316 1,683,606 355,000 44
WATER FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This enterprise fund revenue source are rate fees charged to water users. We estimate water rates dedicated to capital will need to increase by at least 3% bringing the portion of Water Utility revenues that support capital to 31% in order to fund this capital plan. A full rate‐study and analysis is currently underway. $7,990,070 $8,398,899 $9,646,160 $9,281,821 $10,157,888 $9,396,171 $9,376,188 $‐ $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 5 yr avgFY15‐ FY19Water Fund Revenue45
CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Numerous items have been adjusted or added based on current condition assessments and projections; including Water Pipe Replacements projects of $1,200,000 annually. Four projects require borrowing in the 5‐year horizon totaling over $20 million (W71, W79, and W88.). The largest project planned is Lyman Tank and Transmission Main scheduled for design in FY21 (W87) and construction in FY23 (W88). This project is to construct a new 5MG storage tank at Lyman. This would decommission the existing Lyman storage tank, Condition Assessment‐based repairs of the existing Lyman transmission main, new supply main tie in to new storage tank, new transmission main tie in from new storage tank to existing transmission main, new chlorination/fluoridation feed facility. Decommission Pear Street Booster Station if Hydraulic Grade Line of tank raised to meet Sourdough Tank. The Lyman water supply is a critical element of the city's overall water supply portfolio accounting for roughly 20% of annual supply volume to the city currently. The Water Treatment plant and Water Operations has replacement vehicles and equipment throughout the plan to the plan. Some larger equipment added this year are scheduled in FY23‐FY25 including replacing three back hoes (W102, W104 & W105) and a dump truck (W103). 46
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 25,000 THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202125,000 W03 (FY21)ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202225,000 W03 (FY22) ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202325,000 W03 (FY23)47
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202425,000 W03 (FY24)ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202525,000 W03 (FY25)48
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2021 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE THE ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING ‐ FUNDS WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2022 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION (N 17TH FROM ‐ DURSTON TO THE END). THE REMAINING FUNDS WILL BE ‐ USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ASSESSMENTS ‐ AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20211,200,000 W04‐21 (FY21)WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20221,200,000 W04‐22 (FY22)49
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2023 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20241,200,000 W04‐24 (FY24)WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20231,200,000 W04‐23 (FY23)50
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES‐ * PROJECT NAME IS INCORRECT ‐ CIP ITEM IS AS 27,000 FOLLOWS: ‐ REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT IS TO REPLACE A 1998 CHEVY WITH ‐ 70,779 MILES. AS OUR CREW GROWS THIS TYPE OF ‐ VEHICLE IS USED DAILY IN SUPPORT OF THE DEPT'S ‐ MISSION. THIS TRUCK RESPONDS TO ALL TYPES OF ‐ CALLS FROM LOCATING TO WITNESSING BORES TO A ‐ SUPPORT VEHICLE FOR EXCAVATION JOBS. USING AN ‐ OLDER VEHICLE BECOMES MORE UNRELIABLE, BUT IF WE ‐ HAD TO, WE COULD HOLD OFF A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE OLDER VEHICLE WHICH IS BECOMING ‐ UNRELIABLE & COSTLY TO MAINTAIN. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED RELIABILITY & SAFETY FOR STAFF. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ AS THE TRUCK AGES THERE WILL BE UNFORESEEN COSTS ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20251,200,000 W04‐25 (FY25)REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP202127,000 W47 51
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 27,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT REPLACES A 2002 CHEVY PICKUP WITH ‐ 85,816 MILES. THIS TRUCK IS USED FOR LEAK ‐ DETECTION, LOCATING, AND FIRE HYDRANT FLUSHING, ‐ WHICH ARE 3 CRITICAL PROGRAMS FOR OUR DEPARTMENT. ‐ THIS TRUCK WILL BE REPLACED WITH A MORE FUEL ‐ EFFICIENT VEHICLE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE OLDER PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WHICH IS ‐ BECOMING UNRELIABLE AND COSTLY TO MAINTAIN. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASE RELIABILITY AND SAFETY FOR STAFF. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ AS THE TRUCK AGES THERE WILL BE UNFORESEEN COSTS ‐ TO MAINTAIN THIS VEHICLE. ‐ WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME & NOT DEFER ‐ OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND, ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO BE ‐ POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ‐ PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202140,000 W56 (FY21)REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 202227,000 W49 52
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME & NOT DEFER ‐ OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND, ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURE ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED AND BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202240,000 W56 (FY22)53
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND WILL ‐ PREVENT DEFERRMENT OF OTHER PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS ‐ FUND, MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A ‐ YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO BE ‐ POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ‐ PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202340,000 W56 (FY23)54
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND NOT ‐ DEFER OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT ‐ FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202440,000 W56 (FY24)55
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND NOT ‐ DEFER OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT ‐ FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202540,000 W56 (FY25)56
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM ‐ WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE OPERATOR ‐ IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING THE PROCESS. ‐ IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE RAW WATER INTAKES TO ‐ THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. IT WILL ALLOW ‐ STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPOSED ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE PROCESS AT ‐ A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION OF ‐ THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS ‐ WILL BE STREAMLINED AND WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE ‐ FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COST INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202130,000 W57 (FY21) 57
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES & COME UP WITH ‐ IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM WILL ‐ ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE OPERATOR'S ‐ IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING THE PROCESS. ‐ IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE RAW WATER INTAKES TO ‐ THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. IT WILL ALLOW ‐ STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPOSED ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE PROCESS ‐ AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION ‐ OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS ‐ WILL BE STREAMLINED AND WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE ‐ FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS ‐ STARTED WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT ‐ IS PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202230,000 W57 (FY22)58
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM ‐ WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEMS IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE ‐ SURE THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS WILL BE ‐ STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202330,000 W57 (FY23) 59
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ‐ ITEM WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEM IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE ‐ THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE ‐ OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES ‐ THE PROCESS WILL BE STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY ‐ IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT KNOWING ‐ IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202430,000 W57 (FY24) 60
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ‐ ITEM WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEM IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE ‐ THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE ‐ OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES ‐ THE PROCESS WILL BE STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY ‐ IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT KNOWING ‐ IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202530,000 W57 (FY25) 61
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PREPARE & EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END‐USERS. WORK‐AROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH HEAVY ‐ BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE ‐ STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & QUANTIFIABLE ‐ BENEFITS THAT IMPROVE PROJECT QUALITY, PROCESSES, ‐ OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. DEPENDING ‐ ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES COULD RESULT IN ‐ FOLLOW‐UP R & R. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NO INSPECTION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES & THEREBY OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY ‐ OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE WHOLE ASSET IF ‐ NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN ‐ CAN IDENTIFY ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ‐ ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED THEREBY ‐ SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY IN REPLACING ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING ORDER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2022100,000 W69 (FY22) 62
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PREPARE & EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END‐USERS. WORK‐AROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH HEAVY ‐ BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE ‐ STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & QUANTIFIABLE ‐ BENEFITS THAT IMPROVE PROJECT QUALITY, PROCESSES, ‐ OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. DEPENDING ‐ ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES COULD RESULT IN ‐ FOLLOW‐UP R & R. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NO INSPECTION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES & THEREBY OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY ‐ OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE WHOLE ASSET IF ‐ NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN ‐ CAN IDENTIFY ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ‐ ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED THEREBY ‐ SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY IN REPLACING ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING ORDER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2024100,000 W69 (FY24)63
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PREPARE & EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END‐USERS. WORK‐AROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH HEAVY ‐ BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE ‐ STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & QUANTIFIABLE ‐ BENEFITS THAT IMPROVE PROJECT QUALITY, PROCESSES, ‐ OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. DEPENDING ‐ ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES COULD RESULT IN ‐ FOLLOW‐UP R & R. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NO INSPECTION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES & THEREBY OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY ‐ OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE WHOLE ASSET IF ‐ NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN ‐ CAN IDENTIFY ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ‐ ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED THEREBY ‐ SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY IN REPLACING ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING ORDER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT UNSCHEDULED200,000 W69 (UNSCHEDULED)64
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION 6,710,000 UPGRADES ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADE PRESSURE INSTRUMENTATION, AUTOMATE VALVE ‐ ACTUATION, AND PROVIDE A LAN CONNECTION & SCADA ‐ PROGRAMMING FOR REALTIME MONITORING & REMOTE ‐ CONTROL OF PRV SETTINGS. WITHOUT THIS PROJECT, ‐ SYSTEM OPERATORS ARE WITHOUT VITAL DATA ON SYSTEM ‐ OPERATING CONDITIONS. LIMITED REAL TIME DATA ‐ ALLOWS OPERATORS TO ANTICIPATE, DIAGNOSE, OR ‐ CORRECT ABNORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS. ‐ STANDARDIZED PRESSURE CONTROL OFFERS IMPROVED ‐ PROTECTIONS FROM SURGE CONDITIONS WHICH ARE A ‐ LIKELY CAUSE OF PIPE FAILURE. IT WILL ALSO ‐ IMPROVE SERVICE LEVELS TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS ‐ WHERE PRESSURE TRANSIENTS CAUSE LEAKS IN SPRINKLER ‐ SYSTEMS OR WITHIN CUSTOMER PREMISES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE IMPROVED ‐ ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING CONFINED ‐ SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE AND IMPROVE ‐ SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT SYSTEM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES. ‐ PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADES20246,710,000 W71 65
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES 1,750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADE HATCH/ENTRY, VALVING, PIPING, PRESSURE ‐ SETTINGS, SUMP PUMPS AND PROVIDE POWER, WHICH WILL ‐ PROVIDE OPERATORS WITH A SAFE WORK ENVIRONMENT, ‐ AND SETS PRVS AT OPERATING PRESSURES AT PRESSURE ‐ ZONE INTERFACES CONSISTENT WITH THE WFPU ‐ RECOMMENDATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, IT WILL PROVIDE ‐ NECESSARY UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT, PIPING AND ‐ VALVING IN PRV VAULTS TO REDUCE LIKELIHOOD OF ‐ FAILURES. STANDARDIZED PRESSURE CONTROLS OFFERS ‐ IMPROVED PROTECTIONS FROM SURGE CONDITIONS, WHICH ‐ ARE LIKELY CAUSES OF PIPE FAILURE. IT IMPROVES ‐ SERVICE LEVELS TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS WHERE ‐ PRESSURE TRANSIENTS CAUSE LEAKS IN SPRINKLER ‐ SYSTEMS OR WITHIN CUSTOMERS' PREMISES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE IMPROVED ‐ ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING CONFINED ‐ SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE AND IMPROVE ‐ SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT SYSTEM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES. ‐ PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES 20221,750,000 W72 66
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS 4,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ARMORING OF THE CONTROL TOWER (TO ENABLE SOME ‐ YEAR‐OVER‐YEAR STORAGE CAPACITY) AND CONTROL ‐ UPGRADES TO IMPROVE WINTER OPERATION. CURRENT ‐ VULNERABILITY OF BOZEMAN TO DROUGHT IS VERY HIGH, ‐ DUE TO THE LACK OF SOURCES THAT ARE ROBUST IN ‐ DROUGHT (LARGE RAW WATER RESERVOIRS WITH YEAR‐OVER ‐ ‐YEAR STORAGE CAPACITY, LARGE RIVERS, OR ‐ GROUNDWATER). HYALITE RESERVOIR IS CAPABLE OF ‐ PROVIDING YEAR‐OVER‐YEAR STORAGE, BUT IS NOT ‐ OPERATED IN THAT MANNER DUE TO CONCERNS OF ICE ‐ DAMAGE TO THE CONTROL TOWER. THIS INCREASES THE ‐ RISK OF AN EXTREMELY DRY YEAR RESULTING IN ‐ THE INABILITY TO FILL THE HYALITE RESERVOIR WITH ‐ ENOUGH WATER FOR THE CITY AND IRRIGATION USES. ‐ THIS PROJECT COULD POTENTIALLY REMOVE THE 20% ‐ SURCHARGE THE CITY PAYS FOR HYALITE RELEASES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO DEAL WITH CURRENT HYALITE DAM ‐ OPERATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ DROUGHT MITIGATION, IMPROVED WATER USE AND COST ‐ EFFICIENCIES. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS 20234,000,000 W79 67
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN 750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ DESIGN WITH CONSTRUCTION IN FY23 ‐ CONSTRUCT A NEW 5MG STORAGE TANK AT LYMAN, ‐ DECOMMISSIONING EXISTING LYMAN STORAGE TANK, ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT‐BASED REPAIRS OF THE EXISTING ‐ LYMAN TANK & TRANSMISSION MAIN DESIGN ‐ LYMAN TRANSMISSION MAIN, NEW SUPPLY MAIN TIE IN TO ‐ NEW STORAGE TANK, NEW TRANSMISSION MAIN TIE IN ‐ FROM NEW STORAGE TANK TO EXISTING TRANSMISSION ‐ MAIN, NEW CHLORINATION/FLUORIDATION FEED FACILITY. ‐ DESIGN ONLY NO ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS. ‐ LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN DESIGN 2021750,000 W87 68
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION 10,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT A NEW 5MG STORAGE TANK AT LYMAN, ‐ DECOMMISSIONING EXISTING LYMAN STORAGE TANK, ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT‐BASED REPAIRS OF THE EXISTING ‐ LYMAN TRANSMISSION MAIN, NEW SUPPLY MAIN TIE IN TO ‐ NEW STORAGE TANK, NEW TRANSMISSION MAIN TIE IN ‐ FROM NEW STORAGE TANK TO EXISTING TRANSMISSION ‐ MAIN, NEW CHLORINATION/FLUORIDATION FEED FACILITY. ‐ DECOMMISSION PEAR STREET BOOSTER STATION IF ‐ HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE OF TANK RAISED TO MEET ‐ SOURDOUGH TANK. THE LYMAN WATER SUPPLY IS A ‐ CRITICAL ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S OVERALL WATER ‐ SUPPLY PORTFOLIO ACCOUNTING FOR ROUGHLY 20% OF ‐ ANNUAL SUPPLY VOLUME TO THE CITY CURRENTLY. THE ‐ SOURCE PROVIDES SUPPLY REDUNDANCY & RESILIENCY AS ‐ IT IS GEOGRAPHICALLY REMOVED FROM THE SOURDOUGH/ ‐ HYALITE SOURCE & PROVIDES AN INDEPENDENT ‐ CONNECTION TO THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. THE ‐ EFFECTIVE AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY IS INCREASED ‐ SINCE THE NEW STORAGE SYSTEM WILL NOT LEAK & WILL ‐ EXPAND THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS ABLE TO BE SUPPLIED ‐ BY LYMAN WATER. LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURE OF LYMAN ‐ SUPPLY SYSTEM WILL BE DRAMATICALLY REDUCED BY ‐ REPLACED STORAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION OF EXISTING LYMAN SYSTEM. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REPLACES LYMAN STORAGE TANK WHICH IS AT THE END OF ‐ ITS USEFUL LIFE. INCREASES EFFECTIVE AVAILABLE ‐ SUPPLY AS EXISTING TANK LEAKS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANTICIPATED OPERATING COST REDUCTION RELATED TO ‐ PEAR STREET BOOSTER DECOMMISSIONING. ‐ LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION 202310,000,000 W88 69
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #TOC ANALYZER 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WE DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE A TOC ANALYZER IN THE LAB. ‐ IT WILL INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ANALYZING SAMPLES ‐ ON SITE INSTEAD OF SENDING TO A LAB AND WAITING ‐ FOR RESULTS. TURN AROUND TIME WILL BE REDUCED ‐ SUBSTANTIALLY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE OUTSIDE LABS AND WAIT LONG PERIODS ‐ FOR RESULTS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REDUCED LAB COSTS AND WAIT TIME. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF MAINTENANCE/SNOW PLOW VEHICLE. ‐ TRUCK GETS HEAVY USE AND IS CRITICAL TO OPERATIONS ‐ AND MAINTENANCE OF BOTH THE SOURDOUGH PLANT & ‐ LYMAN CREEK. IT IS A 2008 WITH HIGH MILEAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ RISK OF VEHICLE BREAKDOWN AND INCREASED ‐ REPAIR COSTS AS VEHICLE HAS HIGH MILEAGE & IS ‐ USED DAILY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REDUCED MAINTENANCE COSTS AND DOWN TIME. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT 202460,000 W93 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON ANALYZER 202330,000 W90 70
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK 3361 53,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF 2006 1 TON SERVICE TRUCK WITH ‐ 55328 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NONE ‐ REPLACE 1 TON TRUCK 3402 53,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 1 TON TRUCK WITH 57593 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ LEASE OR RENT ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ HYALITE GUARDRAIL 70,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THESE ARE MATCHING FUNDS TO THE FOREST SERVICE TO ‐ INSTALL GUARDRAIL ON HYALITE ROAD NEAR THE CITY'S ‐ WATER INTAKE. THERE WERE MULTIPLE CAR ACCIDENTS ‐ IN THIS VICINITY IN 2019 POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ‐ CITY WATER SUPPLY AT THE RAW WATER INTAKE. NEW ‐ GUARDRAIL WILL HELP PREVENT VEHICLE ACCIDENTS INTO ‐ THE CREEK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ REPLACEMENT 1 TON TRUCK 202553,000 W98 HYALITE GUARDRAIL EXTENSIONREPLACEMENT 1 TON TRUCK 202453,000 W97 202170,000 W99 71
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE #3605 GMC CANYON 45,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS VEHICLE REPLACES #3605 THAT HAS BEEN USED ‐ ROUTINELY FOR SAMPLING UNTIL 2018. ‐ IT CURRENTLY HAS OVER 50,000 MILES ON IT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE DRIVING #3605 AND RISK BREAK DOWNS & ‐ INCREASED MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ ADVANTAGES TO APPROVAL: ‐ NEW VEHICLE WILL BE MORE RELIABLE & RESULT IN ‐ LOWER MAINTENANCE & REPAIR COSTS ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ WTP TANK OUTLET MONITORING 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE NEED TO MONITOR WATER QUALITY LEAVING THE WTP ‐ TANK IS GOING TO BECOME NECESSARY AS THE CITY ADDSREDUNDANT LINES TO TOWN. IN ORDER TO MEET CT REQUIREMENTS, CHLORINE, PH, AND FLOW WILL HAVE TO BE MONITORED AT THE OUTLET OF THE TANK. PUTTING A DOGHOUSE STRUCTURE WITH HEATING, POWER, AND VENTILATION TO HOUSE THE ANALYZER EQUIPMENT ON THE OUTLET PIPE OF THE WTP TANK WITH TAPS INTO THE PIP WILL ACCOMPLISH THIS. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT BEING ABLE TO USE THE WTP TANK FOR CT VALUE ‐ CALCULATION AND RISK BEING OUT OF COMPLIANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ BEING ABLE TO BETTER TRACK WATER QUALITY AND ADD ‐ CONNECTIONS BEFORE THE SOURDOUGH TANK AND AT ‐ THE END OF FUTURE PIPES TO TOWN. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL FOR CALIBRATION STANDARDS AND EQUIPMENT ‐ REPLACE #3605 GMC CANYON 202445,000 W100 WTP TANK OUTLET MONITOR 2025100,000 W10172
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE BACKHOE 1772 142,054 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE 1996 BACKHOE WITH 5007 HOURS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED NONE ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3157 132,203 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACE SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCK WITH DOUBLE AXLE ‐ EXISTING 2004 DUMP TRUCK WITH 34821 MILES ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED NONE ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE REPLACE BACKHOE 146,316 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2006 CATERPILLAR BACKHOE WITH 2856 HR ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED RENT OR LEASE ADDITIONAL OPERATION COSTS NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE REPLACE BACKHOE 1772 2023142,054 W102REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3157 2023132,203 W103REPLACE BACKHOE 3293 2024146,316 W10473
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE BACKHOE 3419 150,706 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 BACKHOE WITH 3077 HOURS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED NONE ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE SCADA MASTER PLAN 75,000 EVALUATE OPTIONS AND DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS ‐ FOR AREA‐WIDE NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION FOR PLANNED ‐ REMOTE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE. DEVELOP SCADA DESIGN, ‐ EQUIPMENT, AND SCADA TAGGING AND PROGRAMMING ‐ STANDARDS. FORMULATE DATA ACCESSIBILITY AND SCADA ‐ INTEGRATION WITH OTHER CITY APPLICATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION OF LIMITED SCADA WITHIN ‐ DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND PLANT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ MOVED FROM FY18. ‐ 202275,000 W106REPLACE BACKHOE 3419 2025150,706 W105SCADA MASTER PLAN74
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY FOR ‐ CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH REAL TIME ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202136,000 WC02 (FY21)75
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY FOR ‐ CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST PRACTICE ‐ STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH REAL TIME ‐ INFORAMTION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202236,000 WC02 (FY22)76
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MGMT ALERTS ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL FOR BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION AND WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS AND INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202336,000 WC02 (FY23)METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202436,000 WC02 (FY24)77
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MGMT ALERTS ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL FOR BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION AND WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS AND INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURE ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED AND BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WHEELED EXCAVATOR UNSCHEDULED155,000 WWW1METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202536,000 WC02 (FY25)78
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 3,900 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 20253,900 GF346 79