HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-02-19 City Commission Packet Materials - A2. Wastewater Fund CIP for FY21-25
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Adopt the Wastewater Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for
Fiscal Years 2021-2025.
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
MEETING DATE: December 2, 2019
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Wastewater Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
for Fiscal Years 2021-2025.
BACKGROUND: Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a 5 Year Capital
Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th. The Public Works, City
Manager, and other city staff met in October and November to develop the attached Capital Plan
for the equipment and capital needs of the Wastewater Fund. The Wastewater Fund CIP tracks
the capital equipment replacements and construction projects for Wastewater Operations
(collection system) and the Water Reclamation Facility (WRF).
Public Works Master Plan in Progress
The Public Works Department is currently having a master plan drafted that will address the
Department’s space needs. This will include space for workers based on the staffing plan and
projected growth, equipment storage based on the CIP and other master plans, and shop space.
The completion of this plan will most likely change all Public Works’ funds CIPs next year.
136
Stiff Building Remodel FY20 Project Changes
The FY20 Approved Budget contains a total of $656,116 for the Stiff Building Remodel, funded
from the General, Community Development, and Building Inspection Funds. This estimate was
made from initial information developed more than 5 years ago, prior to Phase 1 of the project
(basement conference room, etc.). After we completed the final programming on this next phase,
the project has expanded to include other departments within the building with a focus on
centralizing customer service, accommodating future staffing needs, and improved safety. The
project is in final design stages and will be bid in mid-November. Our most recent estimates
show the project could total between $1.2- $1.5 Million. These increased costs have not been
added to the CIP or reflected in the FY20 amounts shown. Once bids are received, we will likely
recommend making adjustments to the FY20 Budget by delaying or canceling current projects,
using budget or vacancy savings, and/or possibly budget amendments.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. If the Commission does not
wish to adopt this schedule tonight, it can be scheduled for approval on a later agenda.
137
FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the
Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for
FY21.
Report compiled on: November 14, 2019
Attached: Wastewater Fund CIP
138
WASTEWATER FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current YearFY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25UnscheduledProjected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP 4,191,113$ 1,963,599$ 2,183,357$ 3,384,759$ 3,987,285$ 5,283,036$ ‐$ Plus: Wastewater Revenues Dedicated to CIP 2,480,349$ 2,554,759$ 2,631,402$ 2,710,344$ 2,791,654$ 2,875,404$ ‐$ Plus: SID Riverside Annexation (Estimated) 4,000,000$ Less: FY19 Carryover Capital (3,080,363)$ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs (1,627,500)$ (2,335,000)$ (5,430,000)$ (2,107,818)$ (1,495,903)$ (3,175,594)$ (155,000)$ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP 1,963,599$ 2,183,357$ 3,384,759$ 3,987,285$ 5,283,036$ 4,982,846$ Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current YearFY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25Estimated Annual Wastewater Revenues 9,921,394$ 9,921,394$ 10,219,036$ 10,525,607$ 10,841,375$ 11,166,616$ Estimated Annual Increase 0.0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%Total Estimated Revenues 9,921,394$ 10,219,036$ 10,525,607$ 10,841,375$ 11,166,616$ 11,501,615$ Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP 2,480,349$ 2,554,759$ 2,631,402$ 2,710,344$ 2,791,654$ 2,875,404$ ProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(2,335,000)$(5,430,000)$(2,107,818)$(1,495,903)$(3,175,594)$(155,000)FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULEDWASTEWATER FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 139
WASTEWATER FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 UnscheduledWW07 ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 ‐ WW08 WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 ‐ WW69 SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 ‐ WW70 WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 ‐ WW71WRF FACILITY PLAN UPDATE 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW76 THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN 500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW83UFAT GRAVITY THICKENER DR ‐ ‐ 400,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW92 DEWATER PUMPS REPLACEMENT ‐ 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW96E GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION 70,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW97DIGESTER #4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,300,000 ‐ WW100REPLACE BACKHOE 2683 ‐ ‐ 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW101REPLACE SEWER JETTER ‐ ‐ 327,818 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW102SEWER BYPASS PUMP ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ WW103REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3415 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 140,254 ‐ WW104REPLACE SEWER TV VAN ‐ ‐ ‐ 290,903 ‐ ‐ WW105REPLACE VACTOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 527,115 ‐ WW106FIBER CONDUIT: DAVIS>WRF 69,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WW107FIBER CONDUIT: I‐90 XING 36,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WWIF47WW COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 125,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WWIF49WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ UNKNOWNWWIF50 JOINT MSU/DEQ PILOT 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WWW1WHEELED EXCAVATOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 155,000 W106SCADA PLAN UPDATE ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ RSSIDRIVERSIDE ANNEXATION INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ 4,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GF346FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,225 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,335,000 5,430,000 2,107,818 1,495,903 3,175,594 155,000 140
WASTEWATER FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This enterprise fund revenue source are rate fees charged to users. We estimate wastewater rates dedicated to capital will need to increase by at least 3% bringing the portion of Wastewater Utility revenues that support capital of 25% in order to fund this capital plan. A full rate‐study and analysis is currently underway. $7,990,070 $8,398,899 $9,646,160 $8,566,893 $8,876,017 $9,921,394 $9,081,873 $‐ $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 5 yr avgFY15‐19Wastewater Fund Revenue141
CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY The plan has several recurring items, such as WW08 Wastewater Pipe Replacements, WW69 Small works projects, and WW70 WRF Facility Engine Optimization; have been scheduled based on current needs for approximately $1 million a year. Wastewater Operations has replacement vehicles and equipment throughout the plan to the plan. Some larger equipment added this year are scheduled in FY23‐FY25 including replacing a back hoe (WW100), a Sewer Jetter (WW101), Replacing a sewer van (WW104) and replacing Vactor (WW105). At the Water Reclamation Facility in FY21 WW71 WRF Facility Plan Update will compare past predictions of the loadings on the City’s WRF with current loadings to aid in new projections for future planning. WW83 UFAT Gravity Thickener DR is a replacement of a deteriorated gravity thickener, which is crucial part of the solids treatment process that operate continuously. New to the plan in the fifth year (FY25) is WW97 Digester #4 which would construct a new digester would add redundancy to the facility. 142
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS ‐ ATTRIBUTABLE TO AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. ANNUAL ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS ‐ WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ PROJECTS WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN2021WW07 (FY21)25,000$ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN202225,000$ WW07 (FY22)143
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL WATEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY OTHER YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE ‐ REPLACEMENT PROJECTS MINIMIZE SERVICE ‐ INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ANNUAL WASTEWATER ‐ PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS WOULD BE DELAYED ‐ IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PGORAM PROJECTS ‐ WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN202425,000$ WW07 (FY24)ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN202325,000$ WW07 (FY23)144
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 25,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ‐ MINIMIZE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS OR MAIN BREAKS. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PGORAM PROJECTS ‐ WOULD BE DELAYED IF NOT DONE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES SURVEY WORK NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF ‐ NECESSARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 IN 2021 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN, BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2021. ‐ WORK WOULD COINCIDE WITH THE ANNUAL STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULED FOR FY21. THE ‐ REMAINING BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER ‐ REPLACEMENTS ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING ‐ REPAIRS. THE CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ‐ ANALYZED NIGHTLY TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM ‐ THE WASTEWATER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ ANNUAL WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN202525,000$ WW07 (FY25)WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 20211,000,000$ WW08 (FY21)145
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 IN 2022 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN, BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2022. ‐ WORK WOULD COINCIDE WITH THE ANNUAL STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED FOR FY22. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER ‐ REPLACEMENTS ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING ‐ REPAIRS. THE CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ‐ ANALYZED NIGHTLY TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM ‐ THE WASTEWATER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 20221,000,000$ WW08 (FY22)146
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 IN 2023 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN, BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2023. ‐ WORK WOULD COINCIDE WITH THE ANNUAL STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED FOR FY23. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER ‐ REPLACEMENTS ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING ‐ REPAIRS. THE CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ‐ ANALYZED NIGHTLY TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM ‐ THE WASTEWATER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 20231,000,000$ WW08 (FY23)147
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN,BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2024.PRIORITY ‐ WILL BE PLACED ON SEWER REPLACEMENT IN THE SECTION ‐ OF STREET TO BE REPLACED THIS FISCAL YEAR IN THE ‐ STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER REPLACEMENT ‐ ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING REPAIRS. THE ‐ CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ANALZYED NIGHTLY ‐ TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM THE WASTEWATER ‐ OPERATIONS DIVISION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 20241,000,000$ WW08 (FY24)148
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD COMPLETE DESIGN,BID & BEGIN ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2024.PRIORITY ‐ WILL BE PLACED ON SEWER REPLACEMENT IN THE SECTION ‐ OF STREET TO BE REPLACED THIS FISCAL YEAR IN THE ‐ STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM. THE REMAINING ‐ BALANCE WILL BE USED TO CONTINUE SEWER REPLACEMENT ‐ ON SEGMENTS IDENTIFIED AS NEEDING REPAIRS. THE ‐ CONDITION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM IS ANALZYED NIGHTLY ‐ TO ACCOUNT FOR DAILY UPDATES FROM THE WASTEWATER ‐ OPERATIONS DIVISION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY ‐ WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES. ‐ WASTEWATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐CONSTRUCTION 20251,000,000$ WW08 (FY25)149
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE ‐ REMEDIED QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF ‐ FACILITY EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST ‐ GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES RUN 24/7 AND HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS ‐ BUT WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO ‐ BACKUP SYSTEM AND REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE ‐ IMMEDIATELY. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT ‐ FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS A ‐ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2021120,000$ WW69 (FY21)150
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACLITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILITY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES RUN 24/7 & HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS BUT ‐ WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO BACKUP ‐ SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. NOT ‐ ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED ‐ & BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2022120,000$ WW69 (FY22)151
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILTY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES ARE 24/7 & HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS BUT ‐ WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO BACKUP ‐ SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. NOT ‐ ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED ‐ & BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2023120,000$ WW69 (FY23) 152
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILITY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES ARE 24/7 AND HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS ‐ BUT WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO ‐ BACKUP SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE ‐ IMMEDIATELY. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED OR BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2024120,000$ WW69 (FY24)153
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY R & R 120,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT IS AN ONGOING ‐ JOB AT THE BOZEMAN WRF. THESE FUNDS WOULD BE USED ‐ TO REPAIR OR REPLACE EQUIPMENT THAT FAILS ‐ UNEXPECTEDLY IN AN EMERGENY SITUATION. AN ‐ UNFORESEEN MECHANICAL FAILURE NEEDS TO BE REMEDIED ‐ QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF FACILITY ‐ EFFLUENT DISCHARGED INTO THE EAST GALLATIN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ MOST PROCESSES ARE 24/7 AND HAVE BACKUP SYSTEMS ‐ BUT WHEN THE FIRST SYSTEM FAILS THERE IS NO ‐ BACKUP SYSTEM & REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE ‐ IMMEDIATELY. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED OR BUDGETED AS A CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SMALL WORKS PROJECTS 2025120,000$ WW69 (FY25)154
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS ‐ STARTED WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT ‐ IS PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUIDES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202160,000$ WW70 (FY21)155
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202260,000$ WW70 (FY22)156
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202360,000$ WW70 (FY23) 157
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 INCREASE SERVICE COSTS ‐ WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202460,000$ WW70 (FY24)158
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS WILL ALLOW ENGINEERING TO BE COMPLETED ON ‐ NEEDED PROJECTS AND TO STUDY PLANT OPTIMIZATION ‐ OPTIONS BEFORE SPENDING MONEY ON EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED OR THE PROPER TYPE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, THIS WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE ‐ CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THE PROPOSED PLANT ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE EFFLUENT ‐ QUALITY AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ORDER REPLACEMENT OR UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT THAT ‐ MAY NOT BE SIZED CORRECTLY OR MADE OF THE PROPER ‐ MATERIALS. PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS ‐ WITHOUT KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ WRF FACILITY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE MASTER PLAN UPDATE WILL COMPARE PAST ‐ PREDICTIONS OF THE LOADINGS ON THE CITY'S WRF ‐ WITH CURRENT LOADINGS. NEW PROJECTIONS WILL BE ‐ MADE USING THESE DATA TRENDS TO DETERMINE THE BEST ‐ COURSE OF ACTION & SEQUENCING OF PROJECTS TO MEET ‐ THE NEEDS OF THE FACILITY TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE ‐ GROWTH. ‐ WRF FACILITY PLAN UPDATE 2021300,000$ WW71 WRF FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202560,000$ WW70 (FY24)159
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PURCHASE A THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN & THE ‐ ENGINEERING TO PROPERLY INSTALL IT. THE TWO ‐ INSTALLED PRETREATMENT SCREENS ARE RUNNING 24/7 SO ‐ THERE IS NO REDUNDANCY TO THE SYSTEM. ADDING A ‐ THIRD SCREEN WILL INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF ‐ PRETREATMENT TO HANDLE INCREASED FLOWS FROM GROWTH ‐ WITHOUT BYPASSING THE SCREENS. THIS SCREEN WILL ‐ PREVENT THE CLOGGING OF PIPES & PUMPS & WILL ‐ PRESERVE THE EFFLUENT QUALITY OF THE FACILITY, & ‐ ALL EQUIPMENT DOWNSTREAM OF THE SCREENS WILL BE ‐ BETTER PROTECTED. PIPES & PUMPS THAT ARE NOT ‐ PLUGGED RUN MORE EFFICIENTLY & REQUIRE LESS ENERGY ‐ TO RUN. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING & RUN THE RISK OF HAVING TO BYPASS THE ‐ EXISTING SCREENS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT HANDLE THE ‐ LOAD COMING INTO THE PLANT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROTECTING DOWNSTREAM INFRASTRUCTURE BY NOT ‐ HAVING TO BYPASS THE SCREENS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ADDITIONAL COST OF ELECTRICITY FOR THE MOTORS ON ‐ THE SCREEN. ‐ UFAT GRAVITY THICKENER DR 400,000 DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF DETERIORATED GRAVITY THICKENER ‐ MECHANISM. THIS THICKENING EQUIPMENT IS A CRUCIAL ‐ PART OF THE SOLIDS TREATMENT PROCESS AN MUST ‐ OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ NONE, THIS IS A NECESSARY SPECIALIZED PROCESS. ‐ ADDITIONAL COST: ‐ NONE ‐ THIRD PRETREATMENT SCREEN 2021500,000$ WW76 UFAT GRAVITY THICKENER DR 2023400,000$ WW83 160
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #DESCRIPTION: 150,000 THIS PROJECT WOULD PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF ‐ THREE CRITICAL PUMPS THAT ARE NEARING THE END OF ‐ THEIR RELIABLE LIFE. THERE ARE TWO ‐ 20HP PUMPS ‐ AS WELL AS ONE‐ 5 HP. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ THESE PUMPS HAVE NO REDUNDANCY. DUE TO THEIR AGE ‐ REPLACEMENT PARTS CAN NOT BE LOCATED. ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ ASSURANCE OF RELIABLE OPERATION OF PUMPS WHEN ‐ NECESSARY MAINTENENCE IS PERFORMED. ‐ OPERATING COST: ‐ INSTALLATION OF THESE NEW PUMPS SHOULD LOWER ‐ THE COST OF OPERATION BECAUSE OF HIGHER EFFICIENCY ‐ E GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION RESTORATION LOMR 70,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO COMPLETE ‐ A LETTER OF MAP REVISION APPLICATION TO FEMA FOR ‐ THE EAST GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION. ‐ DIGESTER #4 1,300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF 4TH ANAEROBIC DIGESTER ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. THIS HAS BEEN OUR CURRENT STRATEGY. ‐ HOWEVER, WITHOUT THIS ADDITIONAL REDUNDANCY WE ‐ RUN THE RISK OF HAVING A SOLIDS HANDLING DILEMA IF ‐ DIGESTOR #3 IS EVER OUT OF SERVICE. THERE IS NO ‐ BYPASS OR WORK AROUND ON THIS CRITICAL PROCESS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST: ‐ THIS IS A NEW PROJECT CREATED IN FY20 ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: UNKNOWN ‐ DIGERSTER #4 20251,300,000$ WW97 EAST GALLATIN RIVER AVULSION RESTORATION 202170,000$ WW96 DEWATER PUMPS REPLACEMENT 2022150,000$ WW92 161
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE BACKHOE 2683 125,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2000 JOHN DEERE BACKHOE WITH 3071 HOURS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ LEASE OR RENT ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ REPLACE SEWER JETTER 3031 327,818 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2003 SEWER JETTER WITH 52679 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ SEWER BYPASS PUMP 50,000 DESCRIPTION ‐ 6" BYPASS PUMP TO BACKUP EXISTING PUMP AND TO ‐ ALLOW INCREASED PUMPING OF DAVIS LN LIFT STATION ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE ‐ REPLACE SEWER JETTER 2023327,818$ WW101 SEWER BYPASS PUMP 202350,000$ WW102 REPLACE BACKHOE 2683 2023125,000$ WW100 162
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3415 140,254 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 DUMP TRUCK WITH 30311 MILES ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE REPLACE SEWER TV VAN 3406 290,903 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2008 TV VAN WITH 31244 MILES ‐ THIS UNIT HAS BEEN REFURBISHED ONCE ALREADY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ NONE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE REPLACE VACTOR 527,115 DESCRIPTION ‐ REPLACE 2015 VACTOR ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP NONE ‐ DAVIS LIFT STATION TO WRF FIBER CONDUIT 69,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EXTEND FIBER CONDUIT FROM THE DAVIS LIFT STATION ‐ TO THE WRF. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ REPLACE SEWER TV VAN 2024290,903$ WW104 REPLACE VACTOR 2025527,115$ WW105 FIBER CONDUIT: DAVIS > WRF 202169,000$ WW106 REPLACE DUMP TRUCK 3415 2025140,254$ WW103 163
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #FIBER CONDUIT I‐90 CROSSING 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EXTEND FIBER CONDUIT ACROSS I‐90 ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ WASTEWATER COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 125,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ GIVEN RAPID GROWTH AND THE DESIRE FOR INCREASED ‐ INFILL DENSITIES UPDATE THE WASTEWATER COLLECTION ‐ FACILITIES PLAN. THE HYDRAULIC MODEL UPDATE IN ‐ FY20 WILL BE A PREREQUISITE EFFORT FOR THIS UPDATE ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED ‐ IN THE PREVIOUS PLAN. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT UPGRADES UNKNOWNDESCRIPTION: ‐ DUE TO GROWTH ON OUR SYSTEM, WE WILL NEED TO ‐ EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF THE WRF. ‐ THE MONTANA DEQ DISCHARGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ‐ ARE BECOMING SIGNIFICANTLY MORE STRINGENT. THIS ‐ UPGRADE WILL INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES FOR MORE ‐ STRINGENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ‐ FUNDING: $10M WWIF 630 AND $50M WW620 ‐ JOINT MSU/DEQ WETLAND PILOT STUDY AT WRF 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ GRANT MATCH TO PERFORM DESIGN WORK FOR A PILOT ‐ OF A MODERN TREATMENT WETLAND TECHNOLOGY TO ‐ BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE WRF BY MSU. THIS MAY RESULT ‐ IN FUTURE CAPITAL SAVINGS WHEN WE UPGRADE THE ‐ WRF. ‐ JOINT MSU/DEQ WETLAND PILOT STUDY AT WRF 202130,000$ WWIF50 FIBER CONDUIT: I‐90 XING 202136,000$ WW107 WASTEWATER COLLECTION PLAN UPDATE 2021125,000$ WWIF47 WRF CAPACITY & NUTRIENT UPGRADES NSCHEDULEUNKNOWNWWIF49 164
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WHEELED EXCAVATOR 155,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EXCAVATOR WILL ALLOW US TO DIG DOWN TO 20FT ‐ CURRENTLY WE ARE LIMITED TO 12FT /SPLIT WITH WWOPS ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ‐ RENT OR LEASE ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP ‐ NONE ‐ SCADA MASTER PLAN 75,000 EVALUATE OPTIONS AND DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS ‐ FOR AREA‐WIDE NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION FOR PLANNED ‐ REMOTE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE. DEVELOP SCADA DESIGN, ‐ EQUIPMENT, AND SCADA TAGGING AND PROGRAMMING ‐ STANDARDS. FORMULATE DATA ACCESSIBILITY AND SCADA ‐ INTEGRATION WITH OTHER CITY APPLICATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION OF LIMITED SCADA WITHIN ‐ DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND PLANT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ UNKNOWN ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ MOVED FROM FY18. ‐ RIVERSIDE ANNEXATION INFRASTRUCTURE 4,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ RIVERSIDE IS LOOKING TO ANNEX AND CONNET TO ‐ CITY WASTEWATER. THE NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE TO ‐ CONNECT WILL BE FUNDED THROUGH AN SID ‐ WHEELED EXCAVATORNSCHEDULE155,000$ WWW1SCADA MASTER PLAN 202275,000$ W106RIVERSIDE ANNEXATION INFRASTRUCTURE20224,000,000$ RSSID165
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 3,225 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CITY‐OWNED FACILITIES ‐ THIS PROJECTS BUILDS ON PREVIOUS EFFORTS WHILE ‐ ESTABLISHING A RECURRING FIVE YEAR CYCLE BASED ON‐ INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE (STRATEGIC PLAN 7.3). ‐ FUNDING WILL BE ALLOCATED ACROSS MULTIPLE DIVISION‐ BASED ON BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES: ‐ CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE NEEDS ‐ ADVANTAGES: ‐ A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF ALL BUILDING ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE ‐ PROACTIVE APPROACH TO PRIORITIZING NEEDED REPAIRS ‐ RESULTING IN BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND REDUCED ‐ LIFECYCLE COSTS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: NONE. ‐ FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY 20253,225$ GF346 166